Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Plans (2)
+AY /0-1 4:t 2 ii L/ g/3 Z 1 3 0o /° 1 9 M 7 i, (I (f)vey6ye c/o 5/ 0.0 0 rot IYI, new °ea- kil " (1 _ ra4 0,1 oet . 30 51 f.1"- ?_.:1 / C...) *0.4 /02y g Pi Aeli'4 C,-/- Lout/49c pg.67 wo 7, 4r1f OA 97ztv o ut tsfio ----' iv \ our 2 8 2019 v i 3111! ThG DiViSRDN ., . tv0 --- 71 / -\\N \ JP I Approved plans 000 s a t 1=1 06,-( - _j. _ 0 \ ,1/(14llf _i_ shabe on job site ,,,,,,. t-Iti 1\‘‘ ----*-- -" -- (-- VALIDITY OF PERMIT it; THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT t)\'' 1,1- / l'YiZ ‘71 / \* BASED ON CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND OTHER ii;#1,7\ \\\ HOV/L / q‘i DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT ili ..t THE CODE OFFICIAL FROM CITY TIG' b _ cilt; r' REQUIRING THE CORRECTION 4 i OF ERRORS. ORSC 105.4 ) i I REVIEWED F R E COM . CACE . --- T r-.4. i Approved: t , OTC: LI 1 1--- zE eNcll Permit#; kii. Address: (0.--im frg low in .- suite#: By: laik _ Date: 1 t Al n 73 1- • • — 0Q 06 * 1 ' The CLIABILlTy l ree-514, C2. ea :4-• 1449 /W el 1 ity of Tigard and its '. < 0 .:E. PDX Pit-e 6,7,4 rene...e._ 3-0 --332-6-07 4 employees shall not be g...o a o G Ho vIlt iheid i),..- .)e 64- irtfa f/f_ responsible for discrepancies which may appear hereim Orey#4 1,1-1/ ne.... .97,3tir r 1 t 0� f ,r !'t',..i i . ...... d"- __., „ . ,. i r-- 1 4 t r 1 i GENERAL NOTES y SCOPE n o n) SINGLE LEVEL EXTERIOR DECKS ATTACHED TO g THE EXTERIOR WALL OF A ONE-OR TWO-FAMILY v G " o DWELLING. 3 m r- c 11 APPLICABLE BUILDING CODE A., 2017 OREGON RESIDENTIAL SPECIALTY CODE fl 8, (ORSC). <.1, I G 6 20 LIMITATIONS OF USE E G. TPG USE OF AND ANY MODIFICATIONS TO THESE V: AND APPROVAL BY THE BUIILD NGTDEPART ENT l',' �� HAVING JURISDICTION. '�' �' (aIP i A. ULTIMATE WIND SPEED:105-135MPH ���- !� B. WIND EXPOSURE CATEGORY: B,C,OR D C. SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY:C,D,,OR D2 0 1 D. GROUND SNOW LOAD:<40 PSF I- DECKS SUPPORTING LARGE CONCENTRATED Q W iLOADS SUCH AS HOT TUBS ARE BEYOND THE w 0 . SCOPE OF THIS DOCUMENT. 0 W a > U i I j APPLICANT SHALL USE THE CODE PRESCRIBED z (!�Ii�il i I TABLES CONTAINED HEREIN AND RECORD g i��y!ii,��i i iI��I THEIR PROJECT SPECIFIC DESIGN PARAMETERS a � �� ( XO)ON SHEET S12 PRIOR TO PERMIT -J r , 'l'III I I,� I 1. APPLICATION.FOUNDATION0 ' IsH FOOTINGS SHALL BEAR ON NATIVE,INORGANIC, UNDISTURBED SOIL BELOW EXISTING GRADE. W CONCRETE STRENGTH SHALL BE 3,000 PSI INMODERATE WEATHERING REGIONS AND 3,500PSI IN SEVERE WEATHERING REGIONS(SEE DETAIL 1/S11)[R301.2 AND R402.2]. WOOD FRAMING ALL WOOD SHALL BE APPROVED NATURALLY DURABLE OR PRESSURE-PRESERVATIVE- TREATED(R317.1). ALL WOOD IN CONTACT WITHTHE GROUND,OR EMBEDDED IN CONCRETE EFFECTIVE SHALL BE APPROVED PRESSURE- MARCH,2018 PRESERVATIVE-TREATED WOOD SUITABLE FOR � REVISIONS LEGEND: GROUND CONTACT USE(R317.1.2). ALL CUTS " ©=PROJECT SPECIFIC SHALL BE FIELD TREATED WITH COPPER NO. DATE DECK COMPONENT NAPHTHENATE(2%COPPER)[R402.1.2]. I DESIGN PARAMETER TO �� � FASTENERS,ANCHORS,AND CONNECTORS tin BE PROVIDED BY FASTNERS SHALL BE HOT-DIPPED GALVANIZED, APPLICANT ON SHEET S12 STAINLESS STEEL,OR APPROVED FOR USE 1 (R)XX.X]=2017 ORSC WITH PRESERVATIVE-TREATED LUMBER. SECTION REFERENCE COATING TYPES FOR FRAMING ANCHORS SHALL General Notes APPROVED=ACCEPTABLE BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MFR'S TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL RECOMMENDATIONS(SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH 1 General Notes [R202] SUBMITTAL)[R317.3]. S01 NTS S01 c 5 a _> Is = 0 �, m Vc 2 V 3 21 � 2 m A 1111 8 a I EXTERIOR WALL NOTE:THE FLOOR JOISTS SHALL BE RUNNING PERPENDICULAR TO THE BAND JOIST AS SHOWN. GUARD OPENINGS WHEN JOISTS ARE SHALL NOT ALLOW © GUARD(DETAIL 11S05) RUNNING PARALLEL,A THE PASSAGE OF A DESIGN AND DETAILING 4"DIAMETER OF THE LATERAL LOAD SPHERE[R312.1.3] V CONNECTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH ` " ' , " " " " ` " " " ` " " ` ` " Q W ACCEPTED ENGINEERING cc 0 PRACTICE SHALL BE ' 0 DECKING(DETAIL 4/S05) 0 SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. 7 • • • • • • . ._ > . u) _ _ ,:, 2 H o NOTE:BAND JOIST .-=1o SHALL BE A MINIMUM 2x ©LEDGER(DETAIL 3/SO4) JI m N NOMINAL SOLID-SAWN J/ U OR A 1x9-1/2 ACTUAL ©BEAM(DETAIL 2/SO4) D JOIST Q LAMINATED VENEER CC W LUMBER(LVL)[R507.2.2] ©LATERAL LOAD CONNECTION MEMBER. OTHERWISE, (DETAIL 1/SO4) re A DESIGN AND / ` O. DETAILING OF THE ©JOIST SPAN,LJ LEDGER CONNECTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH ©JOIST CANTILEVER(LJ/4 MAX) ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICE SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. EFFECTIVE FINISH GRADE(FOUNDATION D POST MARCH,2018 CLEARANCES FROM SLOPES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH REVISIONS ' I — t SECTION R403.1.9) .447 NO. DATE I — I — l I — II ❑E FOOTING(DETAIL 4/SO4) I t t Elevation I — 1 Side Elevation S02 NTS SO2 cn 0 w \ , Z O al I v,, 1\1 I I I I I I 1 1/ i I , co CD ., fq in_ ii, O. „„/„.,:;„:„:„„,./m.,„ 40 , 1.‘ `a to `e� . ,g1 'U \ lta1,7,4,4,Air iik,, I R6,12:PIR24 IT I k 'Ir 111, .7,........1'.-a::. 4,';w,,,,A,r-n,..c;k44',,,g04, A . 1 i (_ :,;„:„.m ..,,,` ai.....f .-,;,, ,.,; ,1,4,‘fv,64.,,,, ,.' NI .1:. so iii mr— I aismisimmosismom si sF j r iiiiiiiii////iiii& 4 ' :/ Ai aiiism Mir I 1111111111MIIIIIIIIMIIMMIIIRM111) i v. i 40 . ..„.„.±...... ,..„.... Ali.. e4.: ;:7"—.7:6 I::: ..;.._77.1';: : .A ,i 1 4 eti I I— I , il‘i i Y 410, . 4 . , .,,, 1.1.1 , DP , OST HEIGHT 0 J+ ,:21411111•111111112r / ii„ , ...... A fiiiiiiiii 1 ' - 0 _,t_ Z x gm n READY-BUILD PLAN PROGRAM '�/^� (11 m v+ co O 2 n Budd,cocks odds,. N PRESCRIPTIVE DECK C9oaty.9unntu4a lar Oregon CA) 0 D Z �m CD m 2017 ORSC 503-378-4133(main) bcd.info@oregon.gov ��`"" CORROSION-RESISTANT 'II FLASHING INSTALLED IN ::: Q DECK JOIST PER o c ?Co SHINGLE-FASHION FOR " � 44 DETAIL 1/S07,HT-NI/IS-TPA:: 22 y� o 0 0 WATER TIGHTNESS � ` ° M ii li ‘,..,,,,-,-,:::,,,..\\A,...,69 ..._ WHERE DECK MEETS . ,: ,� /��' EXTERIOR WALL ,, , i ,. APPROVED JOIST TO a �_ .t> ti - BEAM CONNECTOR m A [R703.4] [R507.7] m g a �� HOLD-DOWN DEVICE '� �w WITH MIN 750 LB. "� t BEAM PLIES SHALL BE * II CAPACITY AT 4 ' FASTENED WITH(2) LOCATIONS,EVENLY ROWS OF 10D NAILS DISTRIBUTED ALONG MIN AT 16"O.C.ALONG DECK AND ONE WITHIN 24" EACH EDGE[R507.6] OF EACH END OF THEIlk LEDGER. DEVICE SHALL ©DECK BEAM PER ,,,,,,,,„,iiiii BE INSTALLED IN �,� � DETAIL 1/S09 �» _,„ ..,.,..,. ,„ ,, ' ACCORDANCE WITH ��a `' X4,4 1 �� ' MANUFACTURER'S APPROVED BEAM TO -�'=" RECOMMENDATIONS ,* "� ; POST CONNECTOR W '? [R507.2.4].SEE DETAIL `� [R507.7.11 SEE DETAIL 0 2/S06 FOR ALTERNATE 3/S06 FOR ALTERNATE C9 �� CONNECTION CONNECTION 0 T TO ©DECK JOIST PER QD DECK POST PER z 0 " DETAIL 2/S07 DETAIL 2/S09 z O 11, 1 Lateral load connection 2 Joist to beam and beam to post connection o Q. SO4 NTS SO4 NTS �/ 5 re N QD DECK POST PER o V ©LATERAL LOAD / w � a ,At DETAIL 2/S09 w CONNECTION PER DETAILW � 11SO4 OR 2/S06 FOOT NG CONONEC OR ce FLASHING BETWEEN DECK INSTALLED IN • a. AND EXTERIOR WALL PER ACCORDANCE WITH ��tt:;..,.;.',,,,::::',;,.:,,, �' DETAIL 1/SO4 MFR'S INSTRUCTIONS 0 DECK LEDGER FINISH [R507.8.1] -�- © ' L • FASTENING PER DETAILS GRADE 1/S08 AND 2/S08, © © � STAGGERED AS SHOWN EFFECTIVE MARCH,2018 UJ ' o w APPROVED JOIST HANGER �� �, C� REVISIONS 'v? x x WITH DEPTH NOT LESS - - NO. DATE ix M THAN 60%OF JOIST.DEPTH I• a T �Op [R507.7ANDR507.5. ] zua cc x LEDGER " " \~w w FASTENER g z Z QF DECK LEDGER(2x8 °Y J SPACING PER MINIMUM)PER DETAIL "'U NOTE:_SEE DETAIL DETAIL1/S08 `�'_�' 1/S12 EQUAL TO OR ©�O 4/S06 FOR 'n co GREATER THAN THE DECK L ALTERNATE POST Details JOIST DEPTH Ir �E FOOTING SIZE TO FOOTING PER 1/S10 CONNECTIONS 3 Ledger connection 4 Post to footing connection SO4 NTS SO4 NTS SO4 • --" 2X6 OR 5/4 BOARD RAIL o le 6'-0"MAX POST SPACING • CAP ATTACHED TOo ° o r EACH POST WITH(3)16D a o o, �r NAILS OR#10X3"WOOD 6 a ", g2' .- :Til::. :_:t:-"::"7-_—:--::: —:': - CREWS c D o :0 111 ! 1 S - • •~ 2X2 BALUSTERS m "' t I ATTACHED AT TOP AND m e a z N t I BOTTOM WITH(2)8D 2 c�i NAILS OR(1)#8x2-1/2" M -� MIN WOOD SCREW FASTEN RIM JOIST TO —.—.—.— :1ill • 'II END OF EACH JOIST /'' •WITH(3)10D NAILS OR .,n// .#10x3"WOOD SCREWS • --4- ® c-� • �� I © • + , [R507.5.1] • I : I —� ® / • �' 4X4 GUARD POSTS 2 111 • • U 2"MIN— —�SEE DETAIL 2/S05 Q OPENINGS SHALLft CI JOIST SIZE NOT ALLOW THE GUARD POST O 2X8 =3 1!4" 2X4 TOP AND BOTTOM • ATTACHMENT PER 0 12X10=5" PASSAGE OFA 4" ATTACHED TO EACH POST • • DETAILS 1/S05&3/S05 a. 0 w U DIAMETER SPHERE WITH(2)8D NAILS OR(2) • z iiio' CD 2X12=5" [R312.1.3] #8X3"WOOD SCREWS • DECKING PER g I O 1 Deck guard 2 Deck guard DETAIL 4/S05 co Cl. S05 NTS S05 NTS m OC o N } o RIM JOIST t W UNDERSIDE OF DECKING e M DECKING PER DETAIL E/ 11S07 a 1 0/— HOLD-DOWN DEVICES FROM GUARD POSTS TO Qih FASTEN DECKING TO EACH JOIST WITH(2)8D ALIGNED DECK JOIST THREADED NAILS OR(2) WITH MIN 1800 LB. �, #8 SCREWS[R507.4] (a�- ►' CAPACITY EACH, iliti INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH EFFECTIVE MFR'S INSTRUCTIONS. Cil// ---- MARCH,2018 1 8 ...� "e., 1!. THE THROUGH BOLTS i"II II AND WASHERS SHALL REVISIONS BE CENTERED ON THE NO. DATE GUARD POSTS AND i 1/8"PARALLEL GAP , I I SPACED AS SHOWN IN RECOMMENDED DETAIL 1/S05. BETWEEN DECKING DECK JOIST MEMBERS FOR ® DRAINAGE AND TO REDUCE WARPING GUARD POST Details // 3 Guard post to joist connection 4 Decking connection S05 NTS S05 NTS SOC GUARD POST c ,,,_ ' FLOOR SHEATHING NAILING i 9 co o * AT 6"0.C.TO JOIST WITH g 0 co o �` �: HOLD-DOWN DEVICES �' HOLD-DOWN . 0, y ` '��� FROM GUARD POSTS TO � m = v 6 ".� , ,„® ALIGNED BLOCKING AND o \ � * FROM ALIGNED BLOCKING m j TO ADJACENT JOIST WITH • a ���, , MIN 1800 LB.CAPACITY �� �� 2.8 IIIIftft �\, EACH,INSTALLED IN \\,...7.01‘...‘ ,;,.. • ACCORDANCE WITH MFR'S INSTRUCTIONS.THE THROUGH BOLTS WASHERS SHALL BA r �. *1 CENTERED ON THE GUARD t'' ///4 POSTS AND SPACED ASSHOWN IN DETAIL 1/S05. FR M - HOLD-DOWNS OR SIMILAR V ATTACH ALIGNED 0 2017 ORSC TENSION DEVICES Q III BLOCKING TO JOISTS WITH FIGURE R507.2.3(1) CONNECTING ALIGNED DECK Q rir (2)10d THREADED NAILS ' JOIST TO FLOOR JOIST VIEW FACING OR WOOD SCREWS EACH �' '"""" ' 00 LU OPPOSITE SIDE 4010, END NOTE:HOLD-DOWN TENSION DEVICES PER THIS DETAIL SHALL HAVE n- > 0 OF BLOCKING GUARD POST 1,500 LB.MINIMUM CAPACITY,BE INSTALLED IN NOT LESS THAN TWO Z LOCATIONS,AND BE WITHIN 24 INCHES OF EACH END OF DECK. a p a Guard sost to blockin. connection 2 Alternate deck attachment for lateral loads 0 a ti CI S06 NTS S06 NTS m Et N } U aQ \ 2-1/2”MIN W a6X6 MINIMUM POST SIZE al T- 1111 Zw(7) 4:11PNN,.......L. J a o a"'• EFFECTIVE (2) 1/2"DIAMETER u_0 w Nor 1:',,- c MARCH,2018 THROUGH-BOLTS WITH • ' WASHERS REVISIONS NO. DATE '., • FROM 2017 ORSC FIGURE R507.8.1 � ` NOTE:POSTS SHALL BE RESTRAINED TO PREVENT LATERAL DISPLACEMENT AT THE BOTTOM OF SUPPORT. SUCH RESTRAINT SHALL NOTCH IN POST FOR BEAM BE PROVIDED BY MANUFACTURED CONNECTORS INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS OR A MINIMUM POST EMBEDMENT OF 12 INCHES IN SURROUNDING SOILS OR Details FROM 2017 ORSC FIGURE R507.7.1 CONCRETE. NOTE:ALL BOLTS SHALL HAVE WASHERS UNDER THE HEAD AND NUT. 3 Alternate beam to post connection 4 Alternate post to footing connections S06 NTS S06 NTS S06 c FROM 2017 ORSC TABLE R507.4 m c o JOIST SPACING a 6 ? , MAXIMUM ON-CENTER JOIST SPACING(in.) V s c2 N DECKING TYPE AND - r a NOMINAL SIZE Perpendicular to joist Diagonal to joists m m M M� 5/4-inch-thick wood 16 12 Alt 2-inch-thick wood 24 16 Plastic compositeb Per decking manufacturer Per decking manufacturer a.Maximum angle of 45 degrees from perpendicular for wood deck boards. b.Plastic composite deck materials shall comply with the requirements of ASTM D7032 and Section R507.3. U 1 Maximum Joist Spacing Table(from 2017 ORSC Table R507.4) Q W S07 NTS re Ci 0 z > a) —CL. ° o m CV JOIST SPANS, Lj (ft.-in.) } V 0 SPACING OF DECK JOISTS WITH NO CANTILEVERb SPACING OF DECK JOISTS WITH CANTILEVER w CO SPECIESa SIZE (in.) (in.) o' LU Ce 12 16 24 12 16 24 iz. 2x6 9-6 8-8 7-2 6-3 6-3 6-3 Douglas Fir- ( 2x 129 11-1 9-1 9-5 9-5 9-1 Larch, Hem-Fir, Spruce-Pine-Fir 2x10 15-8 13-7 11-1 13-7 13-7 11-1 EFFECTIVE 1 2x12 18-0 15-9 12-10 18-0 15-9 12-10 MARCH,2018 2x6 8-10 8-0 7-0 5-7 5-75-7 REVISIONS NO. DATE Redwood, 2x8 11-8 10-7 8-8 8-6 8-6 8-6 Western Cedars, Ponderosa Pine, 2x10 14-11 13-0 10-7 12-3 12-3 10-7 Red Pine 2x12 17-5 15-1 12-4 16-5 15-1 12-4 a.No.2 grade. Tables b.Cantilevered spans not exceeding the nominal depth of the joist are considered"with no cantilever"for this table. 2 Maximum Joist Spans Table From(from 2017 ORSC Table R507.5) S07 NTS S07 — LEDGER CONNECTION TO BAND JOISTS a o . (7 as cf., 2 JOIST SPAN(ft.),LIC v V CONNECTION DETAILS °6 m v <6 <8 < 10 < 12 < 14 < 16 <18 ON-CENTER SPACING OF FASTENERS(in.) 1/2-inch diameter lag screw with 1/2- 30 23 18 15 13 11 10 inch maximum sheathingb,c 1/2-inch diameter through bolt with 1/2- 36 36 34 29 24 21 19 inch maximum sheathing 1/2-inch diameter through bolt with 1- 36 36 29 24 21 18 16 inch maximum sheathings V a.Ledgers shall be flashed with approved corrosion-resistant flashing applied shingle-fashion in a manner to prevent entry of water into the wall cavity or W penetration of water to the building structural framing components in accordance with Section R703.4. ¢ Q 0 b.The tip of the lag screw shall fully extend beyond the inside face of the band joist. 0 c.Sheathing shall be wood structural panel or solid sawn lumber. d.Sheathing shall be permitted to be wood structural panel,gypsum board,fiberboard,lumber,or foam sheathing.Up to 1/2-inch thickness of stacked a ; O , BEAM SPANS', LB(ft.-in.) o m =8 �_ m DECK JOIST SPAN,LJ,(ft.) <', F `2 o SPECIESb SIZE = g f. v 6 <6 <8 < 10 < 12 <14 <16 <18 C° ® a Q a 3x6 or 2-2x6 5-5 4-8 4-2 3-10 3-6 3-1 2-9 3x8 or 2-2x8 6-10 5-11 5-4 4-10 4-6 4-1 3-8 3x10 or 2-2x10 8-4 7-3 6-6 5-11 5-6 5-1 4-8 3x12 or 2-2x6 9-8 8-5 7-6 6-10 6-4 5-11 5-7 4x6 6-5 5-6 4-11 4-6 4-2 3-11 3-8 Douglas Fir-Larch, Hem- () Fir,Spruce-Pine-Fir, 4x8 8-5 7-3 6-6 5-11 5-6 5-2 4-10 Q W Redwood,Western ct Q . Cedars,Ponderosa Pine, 00 Red Pine (- 4x10 9-11 8-7) 7-8 7-0 6-6 6-1 5-8 4x12 11-5 9-11 8-10 8-1 7-6 7-0 6-7 z > U) 3-2x6 7-4 6-8 6-0 5-6 5-1 4-9 4-6 0- o a 3-2x8 9-8 8-6 7-7 6-11 6-5 6-0 5-8 5 wLi.e o m N 3-2x10 12-0 10-5 9-4 8-6 7-10 7-4 6-11 r C) < (1) 3-2x12 13-11 12-1 10-9 9-10 9-1 8-6 8-1 W a.- Beams supporting deck joists from one side only(with optional joist cantilever). Ce b.No.2 grade. Q.. c.Beam depth shall be greater than or equal to depth of joists with a flush beam condition. 1 Maximum Beam Spans Table(from 2017 ORSC Table R507.6) S09 NTS POST HEIGHT EFFECTIVE SPECIESb DECK POST SIZE HEIGHT'(ft) MARCH,2018 — REVISIONS Douglas Fir-Larch, Hem-Fir, 4x4 8 NO. DATE Spruce-Pine-Fir,Redwood, Western Cedars,Ponderosa i 420 Pine, Red Pine 6x6 14 a. Measured to the underside of the beam. Tables b. No.2 grade. 2 Maximum Post Height Table (from 2017 ORSC Table R507.8) S09 NTS S09 O G C p FOOTING DIMENSION$a o 0 0 ROUND FOOTING SQUARE FOOTING WIDTH MINIMUM FOOTING v Q o BEAM SPAN(ft),LB JOIST SPAN(ft.),L., DIAMETER(in.) (in.) THICKNESSb(in.) i v i) mi c.ME < 10 ) "' 18 16 8 mil o2 <6 < 14 21 19 8 --1 < 18 24 21 10 < 10 20 18 8 <8 < 14 24 22 10 < 18 27 24 11 < 10 23 20 9 ¢ W 510 0 <_ 14 27 24 11 C0 O < 12 < 10 25 22 10 a ; 0 z _ <_ 14 < 10 27 24 11 g I•. 0 0 0. a.Assumes 1,500 psf soil bearing capacity per Section R401.4.1. 5 N b. In accordance with Section R403.1.4,footings shall be placed not less than 12 inches below the finished grade on undisturbed ground surface and shall m V extend below the frost line depth specified in Table R301.2(1).Coordinate footing thickness with post base manufacturer installation instructions. a < v# AI Minimum Footing Sizes Table(Ref 2017 ORSC Section R403) W Ce S10 NTS CL EFFECTIVE MARCH,2018 REVISIONS NO. DATE Tables S10 2017 ORSC TABLE R301.2(1) 42 c CLIMATIC AND GEOGRAPHIC DESIGN CRITERIA9,h a COUNTY GROUND SNOW ULTIMATE DESIGN SEISMIC DESIGN SUBJECT TO DAMAGE 9 E 0 o • LOAD'=36 psf WIND SPEED CATEGORY Weatheringd Frost line depth(inches) Decay 60 a 0, 2 Baker 3,200 Note b Note c Severe 24 Slight D v© i Benton 400 Note b Note c Moderate 12 Moderate o "Icn° o Clackamas 500 Note b Note c Moderate 12 Moderate �' ° r? • Clatsop 400 Note b Note c Moderate 12 Moderate �° Columbia 400 Note b Note c Moderate 12 Moderate a Coos 400 Note b Note c Moderate 12 Moderate Crook 4,100 Note b Note c Severe 18 Slight Curry 400 Note b Note c Moderate 12 Moderate Deschutes 4,000 Note b Note c Severe 18 Slight Douglas 1,500 Note b Note c Moderate 18 Moderate Gilliam 3,000 Note b Note c Severe 24 Moderate S.45.5°N Note b Note c N.45.5°N Note b Note c Grant 4,100 Note b Note c Severe 24 Slight Harney 4,100 Note b Note c Severe 24 Moderate Hood River Note e Note b Note c Severe 24 Moderate U Jackson 2,000 Note b Note c Moderate 18f Slight Jefferson 4,100 Note b Note c Severe 18 Moderate § W 0 0 Josephine 4,100 Note b Note c Moderate 18f Moderate 0 Klamath 4,000 Note b Note c Severe 24 Moderate o Lu Lake 4,200 Note b Note c Severe 24 Slightct Lane 500 Note b Note c Moderate 12 Moderate Z > Lincoln 400 Note b Note c Moderate 12 Moderate Q > ct 0 Linn 700 Note b Note c Moderate 12 Moderate11 —7 Malheur 3,400 Note b Note c Severe 24 Slight /AL Marion 500 Note b Note c Moderate 12 Moderate 0 Morrow 3,000 Note b Note c Severe 24 Slight 5 iceN S.45.5°N Note b Note c m N.45.5°N Note b Note c >!- 0 Multnomah 500 Note b Note c Moderate 18 Moderate < CO Polk 400 Note b Note c Moderate 12 Moderate CC LU Sherman 2,000 Note b Note c Severe 24 Slight LU S.45.5°N Note b Note c N.45.5°N Note b Note c /1 Tillamook 400 Note b Note c Moderate 12 Moderate C . Umatilla 3,000 Note b Note c Severe 24 Slight S.45.5°N Note b Note c N.45.5°N Note b Note c Union 3,000 Note b Note c Severe 24 Slight Wallowa 3,000 Note b Note c Severe 24 Slight Wasco 2,000 Note b Note c Severe 24 Slight S.45.5°N Note b Note c N.45.5°N Note b Note c EFFECTIVE Washington 400 Note b Note c Moderate 12 Moderate MARCH,2018 Wheeler 4,100 Note b Note c Severe 24 Slight Yamhill 400 Note b Note c Moderate 12 _ Moderate REVISIONS NO. DATE a.For locations with elevation higher than the listed values or for a possible reduction in minimum design roof snow load from 25 psf to 20 psf,refer to the Snow Load Analysis for Oregon(including the ground snow load maps)published by the Structural Engineers Association of Oregon in 2007,in conjunction with the 2010 Oregon Snow Load Map update and Interim Guidelines for Snow Load Determination for the State of Oregon,published in 2011. b.Refer to Figure R301.2(4)for mapped Ultimate Design Wind Speeds.Wind exposure category shall be determined on a site-specific basis in accordance with Section R301.2.1.4. c.Refer to Figure R301.2(2)for mapped Seismic Design Categories. d.A severe classification is where weather conditions result in significant snowfall combined with extended periods during which there is little or not natural thawing causing de-icing salts to be used extensively. e.For elevations below 500 feet,the ground snow load is 50 psf.Above 500 feet,see Note a. Tables f.The frost line depth below 2,500 feet in Jackson and Josephine Counties is 12 inches. g.See Section R301.2 and R322 for establishment of flood hazard design criteria. ah.See Section R327 for establishment of wildfire hazard design criteria. Climatic and Geographic Criteria By County MIFNTS S11 O , AO DECKING 1R507.41: • o• .£o • o size: 02x Mve-quarter 6 a material: ❑preservative-treated I�`plastic composite ❑naturally durable (e.g. cedar) z orientation: 5/perpendicular to joists ❑diagonal to joists 1 ©JOISTS IR507.51: m s size: 02x6 Tlex8 02x10 1:12x12 spacing: 18'12 in. 016 in. 024 in. span, Lj: g ft. - - in. cantilever: Z. ft. - in. (LJ/4 MAX) rim joist: 02x6 Z2x8 02x10 02x12 ❑not applicable ©BEAMS IR507.61: U plies: 01 02 03 la size: 02x6 02x8 02x10 02x12 04x6 04x8 214x10 04x12 ❑ x_ Ix Ci o span, LB: 6 ft. - - in. o cantilever: Z ft. - .. in. (LB/4 MAX) EL ; En z Ex El POSTS IR507.81: a H p size: 04x4 tlf4x6 06x6 ❑_x_ height: C ft. - b in. 0 INX N Qp LI. • V E]FOOTINGSLR507.8.11: w cn size: j in. Osquare around u LU thickness: ZD in. cc a F❑LEDGER IR507.21: size:.02x8 02x10 1:12x12 fastener: 01/2"through-bolt 01/2" lag screw Ecode-compliant alternate(attach report) 5 fastener spacing: lb in. on-center 6 © LATERAL LOAD CONNECTION 111507.2.41: EFFECTIVE (4) 750 pound hold-down tension devices (detail 1/SO4) MARCH,2018 R(4) 0(2) 1,500 pound hold-down tension devices (detail 2/S06) REVISIONS ❑code-compliant alternate(attach report) NO. DATE Q GUARDRAIL POST ATTACHMENT 1R301.51: ❑details 1-3/S05 & 1/S06 code-compliant alternate (attach detail). V0 4/,,,,,,v ,-,2; 1 NOTE:THE PERMIT APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE THE PROJECT SPECIFIC DESIGN BY CHECKING THE APPLICABLE Prnfor Specific I BOXES AND ENTERING THE APPROPRIATE INFORMATION ABOVE PRIOR TO PERMIT APPLICATION. nformation 0 Project Specific Information NTS S12