Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
UFR2019-00005
APPROVED UFR2O19 - 00005 SUMMERBROOK NOTICE OF TYPE I DECISION URBAN FORESTRY REVIEW UFR2019-00005 P • MODIFICATION OF URBAN FORESTRY PLAN FOR SUMMERBROOK TIGARD 120 DAYS = October 1, 2019 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: Summerbrook CASE NO.: Urban Forestry Review(UFR) UFR2019-00005 PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to modify the Urban Forestry Plan approved under the Summerbrook Subdivision (Case No. SUB2017-00009). Specifically, the applicant proposes to remove two (2) trees on Lot 13 and one (1) tree on Lot 15 that were originally proposed for preservation, in order to accommodate larger building footprints for new homes. The applicant also proposes to modify the location of tree protection fencing,and to plant two (2) new Oregon White Oaks. APPLICANT: David Weekley Homes Attn: Michele Schiedler 1905 NW 169th Place, Suite 102 Beaverton, OR 97006 OWNERS: David Weekley Homes 1905 NW 169th Place, Suite 102 Beaverton, OR 97006 Willow Creek Land,LLC P.O. Box 1060 Woodburn,OR 97071 LOCATIONS: 11994 and 12074 SW Summerbrook Lane WCTM 1S134BD,Tax Lots 13000 and 13200 BASE ZONE: R-4.5: Low Density Residential Zone APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code (CDC) Chapter 18.420.060.F SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section N. UFR2019-00005 Summerbrook—Urban Forestry Plan Modification 1 SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site Information: The subject properties are Lots 13 and 15 of the Summerbrook Subdivision (Case No. SUB2017-0009), which was approved by the City of Tigard Hearings Officer in June 2018. This approval was for 15-lot subdivision, located on the east side of SW 1215` Avenue, north of SW North Dakota Street, and south of SW Springwood Drive. The properties are zoned R-4.5 (Low-Density Residential), as are adjacent properties. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS 18.420.060.F.Urban forestry plan modification. Except as exempted in Paragraph 18.420.060.F.1, an application to modify the urban forestry plan component of a land use approval is processed through a Type I procedure, as provided in Section 18.710.050, using the approval criteria in Paragraph 18.420.060.F.2. The applicant proposes to modify the Urban Forestry Plan approved under the Summerbrook Subdivision (Case No. SUB2017-00009). Specifically, the applicant proposes to remove two (2) trees on Lot 13 and one(1)tree on Lot 15 that were originally proposed for preservation,in order to accommodate larger building footprints for new homes. The removal of these trees is not exempt from the Type I Urban Forestry Plan Modification. Therefore, this application is subject to the approval criteria outlined below.Additionally,the applicant proposes to modify the location of tree protection fencing,and to plant two (2) new Oregon White Oaks. 2. Approval criteria. The approval authority will approve or approve with conditions the modification to the urban forestry plan component of a land use approval when all of the following are met: a. The project arborist or landscape architect has provided a report and statement certifying that the previously approved urban forestry plan did not account for the circumstances that led to the proposed modification; The project arborist has provided a revised report and statement certifying that the previously approved Urban Forestry Plan did not account for the circumstances that led to the proposed modification. During land use review, the applicant provided estimated building footprints for the proposed new homes on Lots 13 and 15. The applicant has now completed final building plans for the proposed new homes, and the building footprints are larger than the ones proposed during land use review. Accordingly, the applicant proposes to remove two (2) trees on Lot 13 and one (1) tree on Lot 15 that were originally proposed for preservation, in order to accommodate the larger building footprints. Additionally, the applicant proposes to modify the location of tree protection fencing, and to plant two (2) new Oregon White Oaks. This criterion is met. b. The project arborist or landscape architect has provided a report and statement certifying that there is no practicable alternative to the proposed modification; and The project arborist has provided a revised report and statement certifying that there is no practicable alternative to the proposed modification. This criterion is met. c. The project arborist or landscape architect demonstrates compliance with Subsection 18.420.060.B through a modified urban forestry plan. (Ord. 18-28 §1) The project arborist submitted a revised Urban Forestry Plan and supplemental report that demonstrate UFR2019-00005 Summerbrook—Urban Forestry Plan Modification 2 compliance with CDC 18.420.060.B,including tree preservation, protection, and canopy standards. This criterion is met. CONCLUSION: As demonstrated in the analysis above, the proposed modification to the Urban Forestry Plan Component of the approved Summerbrook Subdivision meets all applicable approval criteria. SECTION V. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was provided to: X The applicant and owner Final Decision: A Modification to the Urban Forestry Plan Component of a Land Use Approval is a Type I Procedure. As such, this decision is final for purposes of appeal on the date it is mailed or otherwise provided to the applicant, whichever occurs first. This decision is not appealable locally, and is the final decision of the City. THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JUNE 3, 2019, AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JUNE 4, 2019. Questions: If you have any questions,please contact Lina Smith at (503) 718-2438 or LinaCSa,tigard-or.gov. June 3, 2019 APPROVED BY: Lina Smith,Assistant Planner Community Development Director's Designee UFR2019-00005 Summerbrook—Urban Forestry Plan Modification 3 RECEIVED I I Q I I I I LEGEND C I I ENGLEWGG� Ili I I I I 8 EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE RETAINED/PROTECTED EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE TO BE RETAINED/PROTECTED Z Y 00 MAY 3 0 2019 I I I I I I EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED X O N0 � Lor oT 1 ,r 1. - TREE PROTECTION FENCING • •_I G M CITY OF TIGARD A • — _ Lor 4s ARBORIST SUPERWSIONti ` ' W LN, 6 _Li =1 . _av-skolo_ = =azietf6-d_ - - /////////////„ - REQUIRED FOR WORK BENE47N m 0 F. m PLANNING/ENGINEERING TRACT B 0 ���'i`% c� PROTECTED °�p�NESm ? O ' 0 ao 0 15' JO' 6' WQ 6,437 SF 1/%% I ROOT- PROTECTION ZONE J Q 6 610 SF_ n� �X( �� rl�rl' / 1 7,836 SF O F•, SCALE: 1"= 30' \"-—__ 1, OO) 1 J _ . �� � co 11"x17"©1"= 60' "— e l�I/ 1 12 u� H f- A 10d. 7,892 SF 1 1 _ .® /, I 1 TREE PROTECTION NOTES: IT F I ARD — — — R 1. TREE PROTECTION ZONE. THE TREEOPROEEZONE A SHALLU .BE I SD— n OD ESTABLISHED AT THE DRIPLINE OF PROTECTED TREES AS A MINIMUM. IF V � `i' r INFRASTRUCTURE MUST BE INSTALLED CLOSER TO PROTECTED TREES, /� {� D ~�ss—s5 •I © PROJECT ETPZ MAYBE O BST ESTABLISHEDINTHAT THE TREES WILLWTHIN THE DRIPLINE RNAT IF UNDULY Approved by r 1- nning I —I+� Q i I DAMAGED. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING WITH nate: 1'1 _,.,,__ THE PROJECT ARBORIST PRIOR TO WORKING BENEATH PROTECTED TREE `moiDRIPLINES. Z' 8 W„ r� Q 7,638 SF • 2. PROTECTION FENCING. ALL TREES TO BE RETAINED SHALL BE PROTECTED 0! lltials: : ___ - _ r� BY 5-FOOT TALL METAL FENCING UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE l� _. ”- -�' I 11 Q 13 , LOT u CITY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE. PROTECTION FENCING SHALL BE SECURED 1- 8,037 SF I 7,500 SF TO STEEL POSTS PLACED NO FURTHER THAN 8-FEET APART AND SHALL Q 6 BE INSTALLED AT THE EDGE OF THE TPZ. > J 7732 SF QI I I • , \O• 3. SPECIAL PROTECTION. IN ADDITION TO TREE PROTECTION FENCING, SILT Q TREE PROTECTION FENCING NOTE: I I I Li_____ \ FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED OUTSIDE OF THE TREE PROTECTION Ce > Z 1 . 1I l�cj FENCING AS SPECIAL PROTECTION FOR PORT ORFORD CEDARS WHICH AREWCONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH LJI QLJ — — 7\1 — — HIGHLY SUSCEPTIBLE TO ROOT DISEASE. DO NOT TRENCH SILT FENCING COOC Q PROJECT ARBORIST PRIOR TO ADJUSTING I — — — — I 1 — — — — 7\P IN PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS; INSTEAD ROLL THE BASE OF W L THE SILT FENCE IN A STRAW WATTLE AND STAKE IT TAUGHT TO THE N W a TREE PROTECTION FENCING FOR I• I— GEPX \<v GROUND. LL N CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS I I ># I PINE 122 . 4. PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE. THE PROJECT ARBORIST SHALL BE ON a LL I I I I [rooJJ] \/ SITE TO DISCUSS METHODS OF TREE REMOVAL AND TREE PROTECTION W Q I 5 PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. W 7,961 SF Q(`\� 5. PRUNING. THE PROJECT ERE PRUNING IS NECESSARY ONCE PLANNED FORST CAN HELP REMOVALY IF AND HAVE BEEN W Q 10 v 14 i" REMOVED AND THE SITE IS STAKED AND PREPARED FOR CONSTRUCTION. • 8,037 SF f 7,500 SF PRUNING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A QUALIFIED TREE SERVICE. // 9 6. TREE PROTECTION ZONE MAINTENANCE. THE PROTECTION FENCING SHALL I•. / I I 5I - 7,466 SF V LOT 42 — — — NOT BE MOVED, REMOVED, OR ENTERED BY EQUIPMENT EXCEPT UNDER I I I DIRECTION OF THE PROJECT ARBORIST. I 1 I\ 1� _J 4444 - - J 7. STORAGE OF MATERIAL OR EQUIPMENT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT ll I — — .7J1 ,..GLA• — — — f — — — — STORE MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT WITHIN THE TPZ. PIM I I I' 10 I 4 [70]GUM 8. EXCAVATION. EXCAVATION BENEATH PROTECTED TREE DRIPLINES SHALL �'..• F -' — IBE AVOIDED IF ALTERNATIVES ARE AVAILABLE. IF EXCAVATION IS P I • .1 I I r I I•. I 7.447 SF ,' -19 UNAVOIDABLE, THE PROJECT ARBORIST SHALL EVALUATE THE PROPOSED a ► 41 1 LOT 41 EXCAVATION TO DETERMINE METHODS TO MINIMIZE IMPACTS TO TREES. g� 1 _ I 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 w [70826] ALL CONSTRUCTION BENEATH THE DRIPLINE OF PROTECTED TREES SHALL z w I•'. 7..298 SF w � p o BE UNDER THE ON-SITE TECHNICAL SUPERVISION OF THE PROJECT CA I I 7,666 SF 7,298 SF 7,227 SF PINE 12 I ARBORIST. 6 7 8 9 ; 15 ac •..1 7,767 SF 7,253 SF 7,251 SF 7,248 SF w 7,538 SF I (4,MAPLE 4..„04AFLLE10* — — _ 9. WHERE SURFACING IS PROPOSED WITHIN THE RPZ, COORDINATE WITH THE u' 1 PROJECT ARBORIST TO PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ADJUSTMENTS I 1 (10665] I > I . TO PROTECTION FENCING AND TO MONITOR CONSTRUCTION. AVOID .• I �r r'1 L—- I — __J I L—— /0.4' '�' J L— ,.- EXISTING EXCAVAn GRADE(FIGURE MODIFIEDON AND USE A ). TH S PROFILE INCLUDEILE TO S A LAYER OUP FROM F THE �- [1°666] ►IPERMEABLE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC ON THE GROUND SURFACE AND CRUSHED w Ilk,, ` SPRUCE 1 I ASPHALT, CONCRETE, OR OTHER MATERIALS.IF EXCAVATION IN • Z 461 1 Q�`NA ROCK TO RAISE THE GRADE AS NEEDED. SURFACING MAY INCLUDE w .yII) OPEAN / NECESSARY, WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED UNDER ARBORIST SUPERVISION. zi®i . _ , i P 706, I•• I ¢ • I I Q Q R1. .4 i 106 i a ��`.'�� PINE r6' 10. LANDSCAPING. FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION AND WHERE LANDSCAPING IS ~ °668 ► 4 ,►4 4 / ti1� DESIRED, APPLY APPROXIMATELY 3-INCHES OF MULCH BENEATH THE N � © ss-55—SS-55_cc—c• 1 A.` 1 DOUGLAS SS—SS—Ss © Ss—SS--0 \�♦4 05] DRIPUNE OF PROTECTED TREES, BUT NOT DIRECTLY AGAINST TREE — — — — PINE 24' i TRUNKS. SHRUBS AND GROUND COVERS MAY BE PLANTED WITHIN TREE 7102477 Cr " SD—so—SD—SO= SW PENN STREET ,r � . SD-50 —�'FEii��II �'. ID 5D— D—se QQ 1 PROTECTION AREAS. IF IRRIGATION IS USED, USE DRIP IRRIGATION0 N EUROPEAN 10689J ��;;'' I - INSTALLED AT NATIVE GRADE(NO TRENCHING) ONLY BENEATH THE •,• I I � [ 1 11 ►�SPRUCE 1� \ DRIPLINES OF PROTECTED TREES. o a r E IC688 L. • . Au57R/AH 4 .+ „ 17. TREE PROTECTION INSPECTION. THE PROJECT ARBORIST SHALL INSPECT MN WS?,,'. PINE 7A �• , ''a4 •• L JGf I to NORWAY % P� "i r J9 AND VERIFY THE LOCATION OF PROTECTION MEASURES PRIOR TO ,\ ''1 APCE 16r PINE 14' c. CONSTRUCTION, MONITOR TREE PROTECTION MEASURES REGULARLY, AND \ Ywr,m. L ►j PROVIDE BIWEEKLY WRITTEN REPORTS TO THE CITY DURING PERIODS OF \ �^^g 5��u�L_gy n n'. r—�. ---1 I - ---� I r[1ow6raiirF I ---� I r '\ w ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION. i d C, o.L,„,2v L':' I il 'I I 15 I I 14" I 12-7.512 SF I I ♦ Z I 12. RNAL REPORT. AFTER THE PROJECT HAS BEEN COMPLETED, THE `11, i I. I •;i 14 13 4 ►'A w PROJECT ARBORIST SHALL PROVIDE A FINAL REPORT THAT DESCRIBES Am 4 I . 1 7,568 SF 7,512 SF 7,512 SF 7,500 SF ( 795 , 108JE> THE MEASURES NEEDED TO MAINTAIN AND PROTECT THE REMAINING }1��57L�1 g 3 / • ° 'AND a •.I 9 1 1 2 POR ,. I 8 SF 'R 16'~ e- • I 1 7,500 SF 7,500 SF 7,500 SF CED zo' rn ►•�; • 11 '. �1�/ 4 c�RF I SEE NOTE 3 I I [10911] 4,[1,7960] I I M 1 l711 [717707 I Locusr IF ,AR . 1• I L J 1 A zo' *' L 702 70 L,0 „i__- ---- RED ALDER-- _ _ --_• � L_ t. , [-�wItET J,�i:T ]''I ♦ (Ili] 0797] / ARBORIST STATEMENT: 1., DOUG S 24' I ' I4. 'A• r'T ORORD "►'7741..., E ,G'E L— — — ——[117o9J 1 ';v • — — �� a (u'sa)— °uA�03R1 • I, MORGAN HOLEN, ATTEST THAT THIS TREE • .r PORT ORFOR 04 - PRESERVATION AND REMOVAL PLAN MEETS THE \ PORI ORFORD CEDAR 18" \` [77702] CEDAR 22• 10 ta' /So KLOTZO REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION 10, PART 1,OF THE CITY OF I. I I ! [117°a] O r1 O TIGARD URBAN FORESTRY MANUAL. (PORT ORFORD CEDAR 8" CEDAR l8" • •I [71707] I p106 037 FORD CEDAR 18" I A -/,.y/'r I PORT ORFORD CEDAR 10" I [1'0�1�7TN)FR � r` I ••1(y„� f [I1706J PART O7TFLIPD CEDAR 6" RPS \•Uj1�" • I PORT ORFORD CEDAR 10" P�� . 1 SHEET 11705 P [ 1 MORGAN HOLEN n / PORT ORFORD CEDAR 6" ISA BOARD CERTIFIED MASTER ARBORIST PN-6145B 8 1 ISA TREE RISK ASSESSMENT QUALIFIED QF DATE:February 2,2018 11 Modified:April 7,2019 REP:1500-125 121st Am Glurrll Vwglplan 1500-115_OBfrpr,CDyout 8 IEEE PRESERYA7lQ4 AND REMOVAL SITE PLAN,Plot Dote:2/1/2018 2:J6 PM,by. Rod Rowan7 , �/ I 141 IeI I pp�� w>3 V E® EWO 1 ENGLOD ��� I I I I Z I 1 1 I I I I pycV V' C°7 MAY 0 2019 Lor ,OT 1 .T 1. O > N M Steele ED Wa1%.. . W =��r0✓ - Wm01' O CITY OF TIGARD o ACT B 0�'r/%'c� \\ W a PLANNING/ENGINEER G o �' 00' / sslosF —i WO O�ay o+ I /47 7/%.--— — ��/ ' �� I 39 7 w J II/f1 6,437 SF f( I %\'l 7,836 SF = 0 Q SCALE: 1'= 30' \ \�\�—�--_— J 1 J 0 11'X17'0 1" = 60' I •-'_7=-=-_-.7.-.._ `re ria / 12 N ,e 1- I ��� I / 7,892 SF r ///� ,�/ I 4or 44 CI Ti Of TIGARD► I Io ss_ ss'—�=-- jam/ Approved by PI nning - Hate: I I !40 •1 1>FI fol/ /37/ 7,638 SF W I In1tI It1 11 / .1_ -RI 1 13 7,500 SF LOT 4J LEGEND CO 8,637 SF \41 1 411 •/36 1 7,732 SF 11 I / v �Q� COSMO orCJDuous ntEE 70 9E RETAINEP/PRO1tcIt) 8 #50 1 I /35 / ExlsnNc CONIFEROUS TREE TO 6E RETAINED/PROTECTED Q Q I 14 1 \ i, — — ROOT PROTECTION ZONE V d I 5 I Y 134\I ,A LU 7 961 SF jl—i >g • 5.00'SIDEWALK "7 / \ W 1 Q / 1 Q\ Y'- EASEMENT \� / \ re ` 0 8,037 SF !42• L-) / \\ 14 �\ l \ PROPOSED TREE-HEDGE MAPLE OR RAYWOOD ASH I"' i � 'I BJP- 5 EASEMESIDEWALK--I ., •� 7,500 SF 4.v-\\--\1"- I\ 1 '... •I // \\ // I i 4,-- 7,466 SF LOT42 \\ // ' / \I I #43• 511 I — — — — --— MINIMUM 1.5'CALIPER — ALL PLANTED TREES 1 I I/ I { \ / v I /` - - - - - - - - - - _ L.N711 oe As,�- - - � f - - - - � / \ m I [7083 / \ \ . •'I /i6// #49•I �rlg r I/,441• III I ; -18"wfET GUM i 11 • PROPOSED TREE- OREGON WHITE OAK 1 ' I I 1 2 I 1 \ F-- L 10 1 Lora \ 7,298 SF I \ 7,447 SF \ / N /:- I \ 7,666 SF I I 7,298 SF I 7.227 SF / /45 w I \ N\ .' p o a�7 i 6 I 1 • 1- •132 i 15 s / - 7,767 SF 7,253 SF 8 9 //1-1--- w\ /• 7,538 SF non Lu cr / '1- i 7,251 SF 7,248 SF - - r N,, MAPLE 10- • I I I I /46• > •#31 1 r. \ r8 / I I I \ • i .>'., — \\I 0\ • I / /, 7#29 / #;o 0 W �' I I.a -+' /12a I .O O ik/ NOTES: '1 cs -1 e�-.' /19 1 X20 ��� _ -- 1. z ,. - .>. /21 .) _'•.'O#22-. ,:.Q#23 y (j. #24 . ,.. ' 025 r26 ���:.� r27' \ PRIOR TO STREET TREE PLANTING, LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE TO A 1_, • Q • • • - .. • „N,,,, ./.: `. - �/ �• LOr�O DEPTH OF 36-INCHES AND BACKFILL WITH AMENDED TOPSOIL. TOPSOIL AMENDMENTS 1 I I>.• \\ I/�\ //' 51 �\ /�\ /�\ //n\ // \\ \ / / '� \ / / , \ SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 1 -© �' i'�"- ���� �'�� suss—"- I 56—SS��S'S_'SS-55 ,© 55— ' \ 2. IRRIGATION TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. `\I 1 w—so—So—so= SW PENN STREET SD SD SD—_ SU—Sp_50 o S0-5p— A 3. NEW TREES THAT ARE PLANTED TO MEET THE EFFECTIVE CANOPY REQUIREMENTS 0 8 X. / / \1 \ g g // \\// \\// \\// \\ I �// �� �\ \\ / /^\ \ N . SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPLICABLE STANDARDS IN THE TIGARD URBAN FORESTRY ,! .�... I 1. / g -° I - 1 A -.;*:,:lit::* MANUAL. THEY SHALL BE PLANTED IN ACCORDANCE WTH THE AMERICAN NATIONAL N. �oww OSTANDARDS INSTITUTE ANSI STANDARDS FOR TREE PLANTING(A300, PART 6)ANDM mm,n g I IP i2 ,k- i. t3 N, K 16 n. _.,: •l.: .. la-T-. . ;, •PO t ••':,o:;..;�;.; (ANSI) \ \ , ( ,-� ,F ;'' '- s i46 ► ADDITIONAL STANDARDS ADOPTED BY THE OREGON LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS BOARD. _rimm f --'�--' - \ -- i __i x\ u• j/ • ._.`__ IF Jy NURSERY STOCK SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF ^ a W a M'O-' • YJ -_ -, -_ i _ / / .�\ NURSERYMEN FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1)FOR GRADE NO.1 OR BETTER. DOUBLEarc^tD•'STAKE TREES IF NEEDED FOR STABILITY DURING THE ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD. \e "'6/ .S \ �' �01• I - II 112,;x` LU4. ROOT BARRIERS SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE MANUFACTURER'S I. \\ 15 I 14 I 13 I I \�. y w ISPECIFICATIONS WHEN A STREET TREE IS PLANTED WITHIN 5'OF ANY HARD SURFACE, �� ' / 7,568 SF 7,512 SF 7,512 SF 12-7,512 SF 11-7,298 SF i _^/ QPAVING, OR UTILITY BOX. ���I 7,50o sF2I3 4 5 \ #13.2-- a7,500 SF 7,500 SF 7,500 SF 7,778 SF 'F-yseI I I I ,AI / y � rn• / EMCOCK -- • \ p 4-\ ; /. i • 11 (117a I I /- , \\ I 1 /est \�N ARBORIST STATEMENT: • L1I :• \ / DoucLPs- _ -- i�.. / -- _- _ \ 5 / I, MORGAN NOLEN, ATTEST THAT THIS TREE CANOPY • F/R 3 / ��� !�`��/ / _ SITE PLAN MEETS THE F 11CAR ENTS N SECTION 10, IW•T a �� / PART 2, OF THE CIN OF TIGARD URBAN FORESTRY \ / DAR[11709] \ i u -- ---.. LOT 25 MANUAL. \ / PORT ORFORD CEDAR I8- N` (11702] , PORT ORFORD O I'• 1 ,•%I -- IPORT ORFORD CEDAR 8CEDAR 18' 2- D ((11703)) ^\ -WIM,., [11707] AORT ORFORD CEDAR 18' I Ivo �Uj1^-• r I PORT ORFORD CEDAR,0- I RP P [1/708] SHEET / PORT ORFORD CEDAR 10' n P\vo ISADMAOTEBOARDCERTIFIED MASTER ARBORIST PN-61458 • @@yy ISA TREE RISK 2ASSESSMENT QUALIFIED 1 0 I I I Sial Modified:Apriil 7,2019 OF F7LE•P::\500-125 121st Ate ChurcW\dwg\plan X500-125_/Otrs8 Layout 10 TREE CANOPY SITE PLAN,Plot Date 2/2/2018 11:32 AM,by. Rod Rowan / 11 APPLICANT MATERIALS RECEIVED case#: LiFe2or q-ods` City ofTigard MAY 3 0 2019 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ITY OF TIGARD, TIGARD Master Land UstA2 i .ti LAND USE APPLICATION TYPE ❑ Accessory Dwelling Unit 0 Modification: L Type I ❑ Type II ❑ Adjustment ❑ Planned Development: ❑ Annexation L) Consolidated Plan 0 Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment O Concept Plan 0 Conditional Use L) Detailed Plan ❑ Downtown Design Review: 0 Sensitive Lands Review: Li Track 1 O Track 2 O Track 3 U Type 10_ Type II O Type III 0 Home Occupation—Type II 0 Site Development Review: O Type I L) Type II ❑ Land Partition 0 Subdivision O Lot Line Adjustment/Lot Consolidation 0 Temporary Use Permit O Marijuana Facility Permit ® Urban Forestry Plan: ❑ Miscellaneous: Lx) Modification Li Discretionary Review O Type II O Type III 0 Zoning Map Amendment PROJECT INFORMATION Project name: Summerbrook Subdivison Brief description of project: 15 Lot subdivision w/ Mixed 1 and 2 Story new Single Family Homes. SITE INFORMATION Location (address if available): 10900 SW 121St Ave Tax map and tax lot number(s): Site size: 3.57 Acres Zone: R-4.5 Low Density Res. District APPLICANT INFORMATION Name: David Weekley Homes Mailing address: 1905 NW 169th PI. Suite 102 City/State: Beaverton Zip: 97006 Phone: 503-213-4415 Email: mschiedler@dwhomes.com Applicant's representative: Michele Schiedler Phone: 503-213-4415 Email: mschiedler@dwhomes.com City ofTigard • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard,Oregon 97223 • www.tigard-or.gov • 503-718-2421 • Page 1 oft PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION 0 Same as applicant (Attach list for additional owners) Name: Mailing address: City/State: Zip: Phone: Email: I certify that I am the property owner or I am eligible to initiate this application,as provided in the Tigard Community Development Code. To the best of my knowledge,all the information provided within this application package is complete and accurate. Applicant's signature* Print name Date Property owner's signature* Print name Date Property owner's signature* Print name Date *The owner must sign this application or submit a separate written authorization when the owner and applicant are different people. / ' �-- STAFF USE ONLY / Case No.: (�t:f �l`7"CO� 1pp1'cation fee: " Received by: /�.r� Date: 6— D 9 Related Case s Re /�' o Det .ned complete b y: Date: 6/she).L' .s// / � ) P Y City ofTigard • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard,Oregon 97223 • wwwtigard-or.gov • 503-718-2421 • Page 2 oft PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION 0 Same as applicant (Attach list for additional owners) IOU) C TLQ-a- PrAJD Name: Mailing address: A ci 6 44 ‘ City/State: bitbu,cak) ai 70/ ( Phone: °1-1 I -CC2) Email: frift C-67-902-5 Cc1-71'1 I certify that I am the property owner or I am eligible to initiate this application,as provided in the Tigard Community Development Code. To the best of my knowledge,all the information provided within this application package is comlete and accurate. osoA ‘It'3 • c • to ' lot A---------- ---pplicanes—sign:iture* Print name Date ((10Y0 ( 0-A.. Property owner's signature* Print name Date Property owner's signature* Print name Date *The owner must sign this application or submit a separate written authorization when the owner and applicant are different people. STA1:1? 1),SE ()NI.) Case No.: Application fee Related Case(s): Determined complete Date: .01 City ofTigard • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard,Oregon 97273 • ugard-ocgov • 503-718-2421 • Paige 2 of2 SUMMERBROOK RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 2018-b2 'oOL LOCATED IN THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 34, T.1 S., R.1 W., W.M. TABLE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON CURVECURVE ARC DIST CHORD BEARING CHORD DIST RADIUS DELTA MARCH 1, 2019 CI 21.96' N45'16'16"W 19.78' 14.00' 89'53'05' NARRATIVE C2 1574' S23'31'06"W 15.29' 19.00' 47 27 47 THE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY 15 TO SJBOIMOE TRACT 2.DOCUMENT NO.2018-076011 AS APPROVED C3 589' SI'50'05E 589' 104.00' 3'14'34" ENGLEWOOD IIBr THE an of TIGARD IN CASE N0.5U82017-00009. C4 10.57 56'22'09"E 10.57' 104.00' 5'49'3J" I LOT 45 THE BASIS OF BEARINGS AND BOUNDARY CETERMMATON ARE PER SN 33170.WASHINGTON COUNTY LOT 1623 LOT 124 LOT 125 THESURVEY RECORDS. C5 21.53' 54'44'52'E 21.50' 136.00' 9'04'07" (N00'IB'09'w 0.16')� N 89'43'51".E 200.96' INITIAL POINT CO 1725' N4'44'521V 17.23' 109.00' 9'04'07" �{6,T8'®C 71.88' 11 H) 82.80• _' ((N28'3Oi5-E 0./9') (H)� 91.95' A 109.01' CO RESET MONUMENT REGISTERED C7 1187 66'15'34'1V 1382' 131.00' 6'02'43' S X. FOUND N R12 PROFESSIONAL C8 6.91' Ml'43'30"W 6.91' 131.00' 3'01'24' TRACT a SEE DETAIL 6.610 SF SHEET 2 1,3 11 LOT 44 LAND SURVEYOR CO 14.95' N18'03'22'4 14.71' 24.00' 35'41'07' R SEE DETAIL 8 r. LOT 7 ^ ,P .. .111: SHEET 2 z 7,882 SF .`Q �•j C10 507 1471'36'597E 4.99' 8.00' J6'20'25" ,n K\5).LOREGON I •'• • N 89'47'12"E 91.95' N 89'47'12'E 109.47 JANUARY 15,1987 J CII 47.80' 585'17'23'W 45.37' 4300' 63'4/'12' ...4-TE JON T.FEIGION 66.95' 7.00 87.47 2252 C12 65.70' S45'23'56-E 59.20' 42.00' 89'37'43' 03• SEE DETAIL w TO SHEET 2 L-11C.0'� • Win EXPIRES 12-31-19 C13 23,46' N45'23'561W 21.14' 15.00' 89'37'43" IN T c.›.!N LOT 8 LOT 43 •Niyi«<N, 7,638 SF CT4 22.02' Mot'43'44'E 19.82' 14.00' 90'06'55" 3 m LOT 8 ,,,,is 80 MONUMENT REFERENCE TABLE ]732 SF C •"r.,3 • •' ,I; 1p FD.5/8'IR,NO CAP,DOWN 0.1',SET IN 94,TIED 5-15-17.NOW MISSING.RESET AS SHOWN PER R12 C15 42.41' N44'47 12"E 38.18' 27.00' 90'00'00" m Lm21.53' - Le17.25' N8924'S5'E 0.09'] [1]ED.5/8'IR,NO CAP,FLUSH,SET IN R7 N K • L-13.92' „„,[148924.55-E ©FD.5/8'IR N/TH SPC MARKED'OTAK,INC.'.FLUSH.SET IN R7 016 34.56' N45'12'481W 31.11' 22.00' 90'00'00' Lm10.57' • U 4j t FD.5/8'IR WITH YPC MARKED'OTAK,INC.'.DOWN 0.2'.SET IN R7 p N 89'4712'E J N 885 22''E 8.04' e4 CI? 2572' N61'55'141F 2475' 27.00' 54'34'09' 00 • Q Q ®FD.5/8"IR 1NO YPC MARKED'OTAK,INC. DOWN 0.5'.SET IN R7 89.78' • W16�1 85.22' ` O ®FD.5/8'IR,NO CAP,FLUSH,IN FENCE UNE,SET IN R10 - Z •`1- ' SET REFERENCE Z ®FD.5/8"IR WITH YPC MARKED'BURTON ENGINEERING,DOWN 0.2'.SET IN R10 C16 11.00' N47'18'441W 10.92' 27.00' 23'20'10" L=5.89' 1 I L..6.91' 589'4712"W 3,00' N ®®F0.BRASS TACK AND WASHER MARKED'REM,INC.',SET IN R8 I < TO.3/4'IP CENTERliNE MONUMENT IN SMALL MONUMENT BOX SET IN RI ' 1 LOT 5 IV,,.• LOT 9 /8"RL NO CAP,DOWN 0.4'•SET IN R6 0 a TRACT i ].961 SF 0 'g^ 7,466 SF R o (9 LOT 42 w ®FD.5 1� m $ m N 11 FD.5/8'IR,NO CAP.FLUSH,SET IN R6 DOC.N0.2018-076011 I. t ' I-8.00'PUE CO 15.5/8"M WITH YPC MARKED'BURTON ENGINEERING",DOWN 0.5',SET IN R10 9 �WI • .__...._....___ FO.5/8"IR,NO CAP,IN CONCRETE FOOTING.POSSIBLY SET IN R7 5.00' 8.00'PUE- I (H) 3 W 3 ©FD.5/8"IR,BENT.NO CAP.DED SPIN HOLE,SET IN R3 N 89'47'12" E 247.25 N 89'4712'E 89.95' "' -. ( N 89'4712"E Oc'In Z ©FD.1/2"IP,UP 0.1'.TOP BROKEN OFF IN SEARCH,DOWN 0.3',OU,NOT FOUND ON 5-15-17 W I •• � 86.70' ° 8200' °- 82.00' " 91.50' I•5 W I 85.61' 0 w 5.00'6069 I « 1 N o M LOT 41 0. LEGEND • ; N )Y FOUND 5/8'X 30'IRON ROD WITH YPC MARKED'EMERIO DESIGN'SET IN R12 ; 8 n LOT 10 416 p 5 SET 5/8"X 30'IRON ROD W//PC INSCRIBED'EMERIO DESIGN'IN MONUMENT BOX IV GI '•1 7.227 SF I`.' 7.447 SF • FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED IN MONUMENT REFERENCE TABLE -30' LOT I $ LOT 2 g LOT 3 , 88 w J..... / CO ,'3 7,666 SF ^' 7,298 7.298 5.f I m. 0 SET 5 8 k 30"ICON ROD WIM YPC MARKED O DESIGN' 4 N ■ SET 1-1/8'COPPER OSK MARKED'EMERIO DESIGN' _t 9 m g m L'15.74' E L..14.95' ❑() IR IRON ROD O : 0 I 27' IP IRON PIPE 10 Tz8.00'PUE YPC YELLOW PLASTIC CAP M • 1'216.96' x8.00 PUE • __✓ J i M W ORIGIN UNKNOWN 3 M `---72.55' 82.00 82.000------ 75.35'-- 37.66'••31.68'•• L-47.90'• LOT 40 SF SQUARE FEET N N • • • • • SN SURVEY NUMBER.WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEY RECORDS •N 89'4712'E 381.24' ' 3 27 Cil (H) HEIS MONUMENT POSITION m '+ R2 REFERENCE NUMBER Lm5.07 n MONUMENT REFERENCE NUMBER N 89'1712'E 408.61' <A m I j+) • - - - `�JJ /-- DOC.N0. DOCUMENT NUMBER 'a' IS.W. SUMMERBRCOK LANE 4?�' 5W WCOR WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED RECORDS 0, 27' t.---11_,-------.------- : SWE PUBLIC SIDEWALK EASEMENT r N 89'47'12'E 389.53' \ --'ZI. EVAE PUBLIC EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS EASEMENT 0 • I G u WL PAE PUBUC ACCESS EASEMENT O ,--]}13$'_-_..1)_7-_83.0.0'.___ ____83.04.--.._--__6,100'___°__.-_20.38..__ t ?I SSE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT TO BENEFIT THE CITY OF TTGARD I Z'. • 14 1-800'PUE CI 1 27-1 <I STE STORM SEWER EASEMENT TO BENEFIT THE CITY O TIGARD I L-23.46' PUE PUBLIC UTUTY EASEMENT • I Lm22.02' ; I �' ROAD RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION - I 3 • 3 500'PUE-I„;0 011 LOT 39 SW PUBLIC SIDEWALK EASEMENT '.5.00'ROW `•�+ •°,$ n OBC MONUMENT DESTROYED BY CONSTRUCTION,REPLACED AS SMOwN �. S LOT 14 •w'R, LOT 13 LOT 12 a LOT it m•, 18.00' • LOT 15 7.512$F 7,512 SF ],512 SF ],698 5.f ri 3 N 655111.782 I �' 7,568 SF $ g•' g x g m in 8 ,_ ISE]810450.7]8TRACT A(97) 589'4712'W 5.00' I z z z z I z �^ / N88Z4'15'W 1348.286' 23.00' i 84.00' 83.00' 83.00' 83.00' 85.87 I 27.00' / REFERENCESRI AT OF TY ROAD NO.2005 .._.i---- ___111 .. -._ ®t(H)®i. 0200.87' 1- 95.00 Q 130.00' 25.00' ©DBC RS 61.T OF.583PANORAMA N0.2' RIO I I S 89'47'12• W 450.87' 1 (51456'56'E 0.261 I W(H) R{SN 14,603 5R 47'12'W .09' i I INOB'49'20'E 2.51'1® Z i LOT 26 RB ON Tl.{i8 N 855078.54 OREGON NORM ZONE W RB PIAT OF'ENCLEW000 N' epr1�`' y�, DOC. NO. 94-032201 ^iy'•' E]611798.548 NAD 93/9125' T 25'1 R7 PLAT OF'PENN LAWN ESTATES N0.2" .'....i LOT 21 Ia R96 PART710N •• PARCEL 1 ' I �� I PANORAMA N0. 2 R10 SN 26,271 6445 NO.1995-o1v • PARTITION PLAT I SW FALLBROOK PLACE, STE. tOC . • _......-.._,.._...___. R11 USBT 0010 4.PACES 9-13 Na 1995-019 _ I R12 SN 33470 BEA'JERTO5 OREGON 97008 • I DI DOCUMENT N0.2018-076011,MOOR TEL: (503) 746-8812 50'• 0 25' 50' 100' N FAX: (503) 639-9592 . •. - •�MIMI `�� t www.emer:cdesigr.ccm . .•. .. JOB NO.0500-3/6 SCALE: 1"=50' SHEET 1 OF 2 SUMMERBROOK RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 211)41-0291x>( LOCATED IN THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 34, T.1S., R.1W., W.M. CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON MARCH 1, 2019 DECLARATION SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE CITY OF TIGARD APPROVALS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT WILLOW CREEK LANG,LLC,AN OREGON LIMITED I.JON T.FEIGION,CERTIFY THAT 1 HARE CORRECTLY SURVEYED AND MARKED WITH PROPER MONUMENTS.THE LAND vd. UMIUTY COMPANY.IS THE OWNER OF THE LAND BEING MWIN ORE PARIILARLY DESCRIBED THE REPRESENTED ON THE ANNEXED MAP OF-SUMMERBROOK'.SITUATED IN THE N.W.1/4 OF SECTION 34 TOWNSHIP I APPROVED THIS 3 DAY OF 1 20)�_ ACCOMPANYING SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE.AND HAS CAUSED THE SAME TO BE SUBDIVIDED IN SOUTH,RANCE 1 WEST,WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN.CITY OF BOARD,WASHINGTON COUNTY.OREGON,BEING MORE CITY OF TIGARD ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF ORS CHAPTER 92,ALL LOTS AND TRACTS BEING THE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS DIMENSIONS SHOWN.AND DOES HEREBY GRANT ALL EASEMENTS.AS SHOWN OR NOTED,AND DOES WOW MIAOW PIASIG.CN/NR1TD'194fleo RESIGN' HEREBY DEDICATE 1HE RIGHT CF WAY TO THE PUBLIC. SET BY - _ BEGINNING AT THE INITIAL',DINT WAIERE I RRNB A 5/8'IRON RDST'AT THE SOJTHEAST CORNER CF LOT 2. ENGNE� WILLOW CREEP,LAND,LLC.,AN OREGON UNITED LIABILITY COMPANY "ENCRIBED II'(RECORDED IN WASHINGTON COUNTY PLAT RECORDS),ALSO BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER or TRACT 2. R �Y DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NO.2018-076011,WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED RECORDS: THENCE ALONG THE EAST UNE OF Z la yNA,^Vann- SAID TRACT 2,SOUTH 00'35'05'EAST.482.54 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 2,ALSO BEING THE NORTH APPROVED THIS /Ye DAY OF /lr y1 i Y ,20�_ BY: K _- ER_______ LINE OF THE PIAT OF'PANORAMA N0.2';THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH UNE Of SAID TRACT 2.souTH 89'47'12"WEST, 9REH7 KERR.MANAGER 450.87 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF S.W.121ST AVENUE(30.0 FEET FROM CENTERLINE),THENCE ALONG ` 'r." SAID EAST RIGHT OF MAY LINE.NORTH 0019'43'WEST,233.50 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT I OF SAID BY -tet�,s =�.�.;�`rG DOCUMENT NO.2018-0760m THEME ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT I.NORTH 89'4712'EAST,247.25 FEET - L TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT I;THENCE ALONG THE EAST LME OF SAID TRACT I,NORTH 00'12'48' DIY Of TIGARD ACKNOWLEDGEMENT WEST.248.84 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID'ENGLEWOW II';THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE.NORTH 89'43'51' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR t EAST.200.96 FEET TO THE INITIAL POINT. STATE OF OREGON ) )SS CONTAINING 155.382 SQUARE FEET(3.57 ACRES),MORE OR LESS. WASHINGTON COUNTY APPROVALS COUNTY OF WASHINGTON ) APPROVED TIES DAT OF M Al .20 LEL THIS INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME ON tW 0' M' Nµ' 20�4 BY TBRENF KERR.MANAGER OF WILLOW CREEK LAND,LLC.,AN OREGON LIMITED LIMILITY COMPANY 0.6 l REGISTERED " BY ern /.�"� -- nL. _ �7^��''_T T ..�[{ PROFESSIONAL WASHINGTON COUNTY s +EYOR yBTARY SIGz--RE —Ty _ LAND SURVEYOR _ ALL TAKES.FEES,ASSESSMENTS OR OTHER CHARGES AS PROVIDED BY 7tWMu -1 !t -1-.41,8, ,1 • ORS 92.025 HAVE BEEN PAID AS OF THIS L� DAY OF 1''1 FPI .20-l3 NOTARY PMBUC-OREGO DIRECTOR OF ASSESSMENT AND TAXAT N OREGON L1 (WASHINGTON COUNTY ASSESSOR) , COMMISSION NO H*2"1• -OANOARY 15.1987 JON T. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MA4WrC1 Off_.209.2. 2252q� BY J DEPUTY _ EXPIRES 12-31-19 d' PLAT NOTES __ _ STATE OF OREGON ) r • 1)THIS PLAT IS SUBJECT TO ME CONDITIONS IMPOSED BY THE CITY OF T ENCLEWWD I N 89'43'51' ET200.96' � ) SS TIGARD IN PLANNING CASE FILE NO.SVB2017-000009. I .< LOT 123 _ LOT 124 22.00 7.44' LOT 125 1 COUNTY OF WASHINGTON ) 2)TRACT A IS SUBJECT TO A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT AND A PUBLIC _� 9'.9S. 18.43' T ACCESS EASEMENT OVER ITS ENTIRETY.TRACT A IS SUBJECT TO A STORM I �� 1 8.00'POE 1 SERER AND SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT OWER ITS ENTIRETY FOR THE BENEFIT I 1 I(' 1 I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION PIAT WAS OF THE Cltt Of TIGARD. I `N 1'1"-t-1500'SSE 1 RECEIVED FOR RECORD ON THIS DAT OF HA-)._ P; 22.00 3)TRACT B IS SUBJECT TO A STORM SEWER,SURFACE WATER.DRAINAGE ) 'PAE k PUE ,,.I. AND DETENTION EASEMENT TO BENEFIT GTT OF TIGARD OVER ITS ENPRETY. TRACT B I Il 20 (q ,AT 42 O'CLOCK A M.,AND RECORDED IN THE 4)A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE CITY OF TIGARD PER 6,610 SF 1.... 1 COUNTY CLERK RECORDS. DOCUMENT NO.89-052437 IS ENTIRELY CONTAINED IN THE 8'WIDE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT LOCATED ALONG THE WEST LINE OF LOT 15. — ) --16.50'STE- LOT 7 BY A R�----- 7.862 SF pEPUTY-COl11ITY CLERK t.,°4 COMBINATION EASEMENTS 1 1 I iI CONSENT AFFIDAVIT IEZ El SSE. TE E2 EVAE,SPUE.RAE I I '- <� �� f A SUBDIVISION CONSENT AFFIDAVIT FROM'AEEKLEY HOMES.LLC,A TRUST DEED !) 1 ( APPRO./ED TAG i,,-..) OAY OF try! 20-N-`- BENEFICIARY HAS BEEN RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO..ZQL9=+5't-E4+oZ_ q 1 WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED RECORDS. C1 •/ 'r ' I q .` L.442.41 ` i /�\ /�q n I 1 IV WADI TON CC RD OF-'COMMISSIONERS EASEMENT LEGEND r4.74' E2I_ - ' I 'S SNE PUBLIC SIDEWALK EASEMENT T�L _ _ -.�._._ _._.-e-55,;- I ATTEST THIS '' DAY OF 1Mpy .20_ EVAE PUBLIC ACCESSNEY EMENT ACCESS EASEMENT 4 El I Et ,O S�J PSE PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT O OC" TRI 86.95' u 1 '( BY SSE SANITARY ERE EASEMENT BENEFIT THE CITY B TIGARD SME Ir 18.50 STE STORM SEWER EASEMENT TO BENEFIT 111E CITY OF'BOARD 6 20.00 22.00'E2 27.00' "'_ .._.__-_. POE PUBUC UTTUTY EASEMENT , 17.00 SME IN' N- m I DIRECTOR OOCC ASSESSMENT AND TAXATION P060 RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION -1-�` I_.,A00'SW -m EX-OFF/CO COUNTY CLERK EEl 2 SSE,SPUR.RAE c Et 6.1 �' 74 89'4712'E (j'J, 5%E„ 5.00'1 Z in aVa 1I 28.11' / S 89'7/2"W r- r J B 24.71' � V w D_ ON LOT 8 E E T N 53'46'15' \ �y F-IW O Ct I- 7.676 SIF 1� y{ 15.58' \ wW W L,3458' W CI VI,'ti U RA • ® GO a 125.72' g J t?f�C N IA`j 8.00 PUE LOT 6 .g F- 7.732 SF 6445 SW FALLBROOK PLACE, STE. 100 25 0 10' 20' 40' 1 3 / III MI - '4'03 ( N 5 BEAD RT(503)746-8812 N, OREGON 008 • • . Ill L 1.(_ 800'POE, I _ FAX: (503)639-9592 SCALE: 1-=20' EASEMENT DETAIL www.emeriodesiRn.corR SCALE 1'w20 708 N0.0500-316 SHEET 2 OF 2 MAY302019 971.409.9354 Morgan Bolen CITY OF TIIIPGRECEIVEDA .. 3 Monroe Parkway,Suite P 220 PLANNING/ENGINEERIN��ke Oswego,Oregon 97035 61 --- Aff OCIATEf- Consulting Arborists and Urban Forest Management morgan.holen@comcast.net DATE: April 7, 2019 TO: Jason Plush (David Weekley Homes) FROM: Morgan Holen, Consulting Arborist RE: Summerbrook Subdivision—Urban Forestry Plan Modification MHA17043 Morgan Holen &Associates (MHA)was contracted by David Weekley Homes to modify the previously approved Urban Forestry Plan for the Summerbrook Subdivision.Specifically, the modification proposes to: remove three trees that were originally proposed for preservation on Lots 1 and 3, in order to accommodate larger building footprints for new homes; adjust the location of tree protection fencing adjacent to the remaining trees at lots 1 and 3; and, plant two new Oregon white oaks (Quercus garryana), one each on lots 6 and 11,to continue to satisfy the minimum 40%canopy cover requirements for the overall development site. In addition, in reviewing the recorded plat I recognized minor changes in the square footage of each lot/tract and adjusted the Effective Tree Canopy Cover Summary accordingly.This resulted in slight changes to the per lot/tract canopy cover percentages, although the minimum effective tree canopy cover requirements continue to be satisfied. Lots were also renumbered,so the new numbers are noted. This memorandum addresses the criteria regarding modifications to the Urban Forestry Plan component of an approved Land Use Permit contained in Section 18.420.060 of the City's Community Development Code.The complete revised Urban Forestry Plan is enclosed. Section 18.420.060.F.2 provides the approval criteria for modifications to the Urban Forestry Plan components of an approved land use permit. Each of the pertinent criteria are addressed below. a. The project arborist or landscape architect has provided a report and statement certifying that the previously approved urban forestry plan did not account for the circumstances that lead to the proposed modification; The previously approved Urban Forestry Plan did not account for the circumstances that led to the proposed modifications because a smaller building footprint was assumed on both lots 1 and 3.The critical root zones of trees#11176 and#11702 are well within the allowable building envelopes at lots 1 and 3, respectively, and protection is not feasible since the proposed homes will encompass the entire buildable areas.Tree#11703, also on lot 3, must be removed because it is not suitable for preservation once exposed by the removal of adjacent tree#11702. The proposed location of tree protection fencing is adjusted at lots 1 and 3 to continue to protect the remaining trees.Two new Oregon white oaks are proposed to be planted on lots 6 and 11. The enclosed modified Urban Forestry Plan provides complete documentation of the proposed modifications. b. The project arborist or landscape architect has provided a report and statement certifying that there is no practicable alternative to the proposed modification;and There is no practicable alternative to the proposed modifications because the developer is allowed to utilize the entire allowable building envelop and by doing so, adequate protection cannot be provided for the trees proposed for removal. Summerbrook Subdivision—Urban Forestry Plan Modification April 7, 2019 Page 2 of 2 c. The project arborist or landscape architect demonstrates compliance with Section 18.420.060.6 through a modified urban forestry plan. This memo and the enclosed modified Urban Forestry Plan, including the supplemental arborist report and Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan and Tree Canopy Site Plan drawings, demonstrate compliance with Section 18.420.060.6. The proposed modifications are not exempt from the Type 1 process because the condition and preservation ratings of the three trees now proposed for removal have not changed and effective canopy cover decreased from the original approval.A$764 application fee will be required to process the Urban Forestry Plan modification. The client may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations contained herein, or seek additional advice. Neither this author nor Morgan Nolen &Associates have assumed any responsibility for liability associated with the trees on or adjacent to this site. Please contact us if you have questions or need any additional information or further assistance. Thank you, Morgan� Nolen &Associates, LLC n 74 Morgan E. Nolen, Member ISA Board Certified Master Arborist, PN-6145B ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified Forest Biologist Enclosures: MHA17043 Summerbrook Subdivision—Urban Forestry Plan 2-2-18 Mod.4-7-19 971.409.9354 Morgan Holen 3 Monroe Parkway,Suite P 220 Lake Oswego,Oregon 97035 --(r AJJOCIATEl Consulting Arborists and Urban Forest Management morgan.holen@comcast.net C R lV E. ,L MAY 3 0 2019 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING/ENGINEERING Urban Forestry Plan Supplemental Report February 2, 2018 Modified: April 7, 2019 Summerbrook 15-Lot Subdivision 10900 SW 121St Avenue Tigard, Oregon iD MAY 3 0 2019 971.409.9354 Morgan llolen CITY OF TIGARD 3 Monroe Parkway,Suite P 220 �JNIaI�NbG/FFNGINEERING Lake Oswego,Oregon 97035 c LI'0CIAT - Consulting Arb n s an ran orest Management morgan.holen@comcast.net Table of Contents— Purpose 1 General Description 1 Effective Tree Canopy Cover 1 Specifications 3 A.Tree Protection Specifications 3 B. Soil Characteristics and Specifications for Improvement 4 C. Tree Planting Specifications 4 Signature of Approval 4 Enclosures— Attachment A: Existing Tree Inventory Data Attachment B: Effective Tree Canopy Cover Summary Attachment C: Planted Tree Inventory Attachment D:Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan Attachment E:Tree Canopy Site Plan Not Applicable— Existing Stand Inventory Data Planted Stand Inventory Stand Planting Specifications Tree Canopy Fee Calculation RECEIVED MAY 30 2019 971.409.9354 Morgan Holen CITY OF TIGARD 3 Monroe Parkway,Suite P 220 PLANNING/ENGINEERING Lake Oswego,Oregon 97035 f- Aff OCIATET Consulting Arborists and Urban Forest Management morgan.holen@comcast.net Urban Forestry Plan - Supplemental Report Summerbrook 15-Lot Subdivision, Tigard, OR February 2, 2018 Modified: April 7, 2019 MHA17043 Purpose This Urban Forestry Plan for the Summerbrook 15-lot subdivision project is provided pursuant to the City of Tigard Urban Forestry Manual. This report describes the existing trees located on the subject site, provides arborist recommendations for tree removal, retention and protection, and describes the effective tree canopy cover needed to meet City requirements.This report is based on observations made by International Society of Arboriculture Board Certified Master Arborist (PN-6145B) and Qualified Tree Risk Assessor Morgan Holen during site visits conducted on August 9, 2017 and January 9, 2018, and subsequent coordination with Emerio Design.This report was modified on March 20,2019 to remove three trees that were originally proposed for preservation in order to accommodate larger building footprints for new homes.Accordingly,the location of tree protection fencing has been modified and two new Oregon White Oaks are proposed to be planted.Also,following land use approval, lots were renumbered and lot sizes changed slightly with the final plat;these changes are accounted for in this modified report. Changes are identified in bold underlined type. General Description The site is located at 10900 SW 121'Avenue in Tigard, Oregon. The site is zoned R-4.5 and does not contain any flood plain, drainage hazard areas, or significant natural resources.An existing church building and paved parking lot are separate from the subdivision site.The subdivision site is primarily an undeveloped open field,with one existing house that will be demolished for site development.The project proposes a 15-lot single family residential subdivision with new streets and a water quality tract. In all,46 trees of 18 different species are included in the inventory.A complete description of individual trees is included in the enclosed existing tree inventory data (attachment A).The existing trees are scattered across the site, but predominately located near the existing home and along property boundaries.Two of the inventoried trees are located off-site; other off-site trees directly adjacent to the site are not included in the inventory data, but are shown for protection on drawings. Off-site trees with canopies overhanging the project site are planned for protection during site development. Of the 44 inventoried trees located on-site, 38 are planned for removal for the purposes of site development and six are planned for preservation in the rear of proposed lots 1, 2, 3,and 10 (modified lot numbers 15, 14, 13 and 5, respectively).Tree protection fencing should be installed at the dripline of protected trees at a minimum, and the contractor should coordinate with the project arborist prior to adjusting tree protection fencing where minor encroachments may be needed for construction. Work that is necessary beneath protected tree driplines should be monitored and documented by the project arborist. Effective Tree Canopy Cover A summary of the effective tree canopy cover by lot/tract and across the overall development site is included as attachment B.Attachment C,the planted tree inventory, describes 50 individual trees proposed for planting. Urban Forest Plan-Supplemental Report Summerbrook 15-Lot Subdivision,Tigard,OR February 2,2018 I Modified:April 7,2019 Page 2 of 5 The six existing trees to be retained all received condition and preservation ratings greater than 1 and provide double canopy cover credit,which equates to 7,665 square feet. The required number of street trees is based on the lineal street frontage divided by 40.The total frontage is 1,860-lineal feet.Therefore,47 street trees are required, as is proposed.The proposed street trees are hedge maples (Acer campestre) or raywood ashes (Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood'),which provide 707 square feet of canopy credit each.The proposed street trees provide the closest and best spacing possible, and comply with the street tree planting standards in Section 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual and with the soil volume standards in Section 12. One additional tree is proposed to be planted in the rear of Tract B,the water quality tract, in order to satisfy the effective tree canopy cover requirements.The proposed tree is an Oregon white oak (Quercus garryana), which provides 1,963 square feet of canopy cover.This native species tree receives 1.25 times canopy cover credit,for a total of 2,454 square feet. With the proposed modification,canopy credit is no longer provided for three existing trees now proposed for removal to accommodate larger building footprints:tree 11176 on lot 1 (modified lot number 15)and trees 11702 and 11703 on lot 3 (modified lot number 13). In order to maintain a minimum 40%effective tree canopy cover for the overall development site,two additional Oregon white oaks are now proposed to be planted in the yards of lots 6 and 11 (modified lots numbers 1 and 6, respectively).These trees provide 4,908 square feet of canopy credit at 1.25 times 1,963 square feet each. The table below provides a summary of the effective tree canopy cover by lot and demonstrates that the 15% minimum effective tree canopy cover per lot requirement is satisfied. Lot Modified Lot Size Effective Tree Effective Canopy Number Lot Number (ftZ) Canopy Area (ft2) Cover(%) 1 15 7,568 4,157 54.9% 2 14 7,512 2,646 35.2% 3 13 7,512 3,299 43.9% 4 12 7,512 2,121 28.2% 5 11 7,703 4,242 55.1% 6 1 7,666 5,989 78.1% 7 2 7,298 1,414 19.4% 8 3 7,298 1,414 19.4% 9 4 7,227 3,535 48.9% 10 5 7,961 3,927 49.3% 11 6 7,732 3,868 50.0% 12 7 7,836 1,414 18.0% 13 8 7,638 2,121 27.8% 14 9 7,466 1,414 18.9% 15 10 7,447 4,242 57.0% Tract B Tract B 6,610 2,454 37.1% Total 119,986 48,256 40.2% Urban Forest Plan—Supplemental Report Summerbrook 15-Lot Subdivision,Tigard,OR February 2,2018 I Modified:April 7,2019 Page 3 of 5 The overall development site is 119,986 square feet and has 48,256 square feet of effective tree canopy cover, or 40.2%.The minimum required effective tree canopy for the overall development site is 40%; therefore,the effective tree canopy cover requirement for the overall development site is also met. The Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan and Tree Canopy Site Plan are enclosed as attachments D and E as required by Section 10 of the Urban Forestry Manual,which illustrate how the Urban Forestry Plan requirements are met. Specifications A. Tree Protection Specifications 1. Tree Protection Zone.The Tree Protection Zone (TPZ)shall be established at the dripline of protected trees as a minimum. If infrastructure must be installed closer to protected trees, the TPZ may be established within the dripline area if the project arborist determines that the trees will not be unduly damaged. The contractor is responsible for coordinating with the project arborist prior to working beneath protected tree driplines. 2. Protection Fencing.All trees to be retained shall be protected by 5-foot tall metal fencing unless otherwise approved by the city manager or designee. Protection fencing shall be secured to steel posts placed no further than 8-feet apart and shall be installed at the edge of the TPZ. 3. Special Protection. In addition to tree protection fencing,silt fencing shall be installed outside of the tree protection fencing as special protection for Port-Orford-cedars which are highly susceptible to root disease. Do not trench silt fencing in per manufacturer's specifications; instead, roll the base of the silt fence in a straw wattle and stake it taught to the ground. 4. Preconstruction Conference.The project arborist shall be on site to discuss methods of tree removal and tree protection prior to any construction. 5. Pruning.The project arborist can help identify if and where pruning is necessary once trees planned for removal have been removed and the site is staked and prepared for construction. Pruning shall be performed by a Qualified Tree Service. 6. Tree Protection Zone Maintenance.The protection fencing shall not be moved, removed, or entered by equipment except under direction of the project arborist. 7. Storage of Material or Equipment.The contractor shall not store materials or equipment within the TPZ. 8. Excavation. Excavation beneath protected tree driplines shall be avoided if alternatives are available. If excavation is unavoidable,the project arborist shall evaluate the proposed excavation to determine methods to minimize impacts to trees.All construction beneath the dripline of protected trees shall be under the on-site technical supervision of the project arborist. 9. Surfacing.Where surfacing is proposed within the TPZ, coordinate with the project arborist to provide recommendations for adjustments to protection fencing and to monitor construction.Avoid excavation and use a modified profile to build up from existing grade. This profile includes a layer of permeable geotextile fabric on the ground surface and clean crushed rock to raise the grade as needed. Surfacing may include asphalt, concrete, or other materials. If excavation is necessary,work shall be performed under arborist supervision. Urban Forest Plan—Supplemental Report Summerbrook 15-Lot Subdivision,Tigard,OR February 2,2018 I Modified:April 7,2019 Page 4 of 5 10. Landscaping. Following construction and where landscaping is desired, apply approximately 3-inches of mulch beneath the dripline of protected trees, but not directly against tree trunks. Shrubs and ground covers may be planted within tree protection areas. If irrigation is used, use drip irrigation installed at native grade (no trenching) only beneath the driplines of protected trees. 11. Tree Protection Inspection.The project arborist shall inspect and verify the location of protection measures prior to construction, monitor tree protection measures regularly, and provide biweekly written reports to the City during periods of active construction. 12. Final Report.After the project has been completed,the project arborist shall provide a final report that describes the measures needed to maintain and protect the remaining trees. B. Soil Characteristics and Specifications for Improvement Native soils at the project site are-48%deep and moderately well drained Quatama loam, ^'40%deep and somewhat poorly drained Aloha silt loam, and—12% relatively shallow and poorly drained Huberly silt loam. Prior to the installation of new trees,the landscape contractor should excavate to a depth of 36-inches and backfill with amended topsoil.Topsoil amendments should be determined by the landscape contractor. If soil compaction occurs during construction,the project arborist should provide additional recommendations as needed. C. Tree Planting Specifications New trees that are planted to meet the effective canopy requirements shall conform to the applicable standards in the Tigard Urban Forestry Manual.They shall be planted in accordance with the American National Standards Institute (ANSI)standards for tree planting(A300, Part 6) and additional standards adopted by the Oregon Landscape Contractors Board. Nursery stock shall meet the requirements of the American Association of Nurserymen for nursery stock(ANSI Z60.1)for Grade No.1 or better. Double stake trees if needed for stability. Root barriers shall be installed according to manufacturer's specifications when a street tree is planted within 5-feet of any hard surface paving or utility box. Irrigation to be design/build by the landscape contractor. Signature of Approval We hereby attest that,to the best of our knowledge: ✓ The attached Tree Preservation and Removal site plan meets all of the requirements in Section 10, Part 1 of the Urban Forestry Manual; ✓ The attached Tree Canopy site plan meets all of the requirements in Section 10, Part 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual; and ✓ This Supplemental Report meets all of the requirements in Section 10, Part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual. The client may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations contained herein, or seek additional advice. Neither this author nor Morgan Holen &Associates, LLC, have assumed any responsibility for liability associated with the trees on or adjacent to this site. Urban Forest Plan—Supplemental Report Summerbrook 15-Lot Subdivision,Tigard,OR February 2,2018 I Modified:April 7,2019 Page 5of5 Thank you for choosing Morgan Holen&Associates, LLC,to provide consulting arborist services for the Summerbrook 15-lot subdivision project in Tigard. Please contact us if you have questions or need any additional information. Thank you, Morgan Holen &Associates, LLC: f Morga E. Holen, Member ISA Board Certified Master Arborist, PN-6145B ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified Forest Biologist Enclosures: Attachment A: Existing Tree Inventory Data Attachment B: Effective Tree Canopy Cover Summary Attachment C: Planted Tree Inventory Attachment D:Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan Attachment E:Tree Canopy Site Plan Attachment A:Existing Tree Inventory Data Morgan Nolen MHA17043 SW 121st Ave Subdivision-Tree Data 8-9-17 Rev.4-7-19.xlsx :.. A!lOCiFrI G,I.. Page l of 2 No. Lot Common Name Species Name OaH' C-Rad' Canopy3 015x HT' Conde Pres' Comments Treatment 701 sweet cherry 'Prunusavium 6x4 101. 0 ' N 2 2'invasive species,poor structure 'remove 702 sweet cherry Prunus avium 12 12. 0 N 2 2 invasive species,large surface root remove 703 red oak Quercus rubra 7,9 14 0 N 2 2 codominant stems with seam remove 704 red oak Quercus rubra 10 16 0 N 2 2 remove 705 scots pine Pinus sylvestris 24 28 0 N 2 2 moderate structure,codominant leaders remove 706 scots pine Pinus sylvestris 16 16 0 N 2 2 one-sided crown to north remove 707 Japanese maple Acer polmatum 10 12 0 N 2 2 ornamental protect , moderate crown structure,previous leader failure,new leader,codominant stem removed 708 sweetgum Liquidambarstyraciflua 18 18 0 N 2 2 in past,one-sided crown to south protect codominant stems,crown decline,western gall 10033 lodgepole pine Pinus contorta 12 13 0 N 1 1 rust infection remove 10246 European white birch Betula pendula 18 18 0 N 1 1 invasive species,top dieback remove 10247 European white birch Betula pendula 16 16 0 N 2 1 invasive species remove 10665 Douglas-fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 28 20 0 N 2 2 codominant leaders,moderate structure remove poor structure,codominant leaders,few dead 10666 spruce Picea spp. 1611 12 0 N 2 2 branches remove moderate crown structure,over-extended 10667 Douglas-fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 281 20 0 N 3 2 lateral branches,one-sided crown remove 10668 Douglas-fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 231 20 O N 3 2 asymmetrical crown remove 10669 spruce Picea spp. 7,14' 12 0 N 2 2 poor structure,multiple leaders,included bark remove reduced vigor,codominant stems,forked 10670 eastern red cedar Juniperus virginiana 6,9 10 0 N 1 1 leaders,included bark remove 10671 Douglas-fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 26 25 0 N 3 3 remove 10672 sweet cherry Prunus avium 5x10', 20,.. 0 N 2 1 invasive species,poor structure,decline remove 1...... invasive species,codominant leaders,some 10686 Norway maple Acer platanoides 16........... 22 0 N 2 2 included bark remove 10687 white fir Abies concolor 14......... 12 O N 2 2 asymmetrical crown remove 10688 Austrian pine Pinus nigra 22 16 0 N 3 2 remove 10689 spruce Picea spp. 14 14, 0 N 2 2 expansive surface roots remove codominant leaders with tight"V"shaped 10731 10 Douglas-fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 22. 20 1,257 O N 3 2 attachment retain some crown asymmetry,moderate crown 10794 Douglas-fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 40........ 24 0 N 2 2 structure,pitch flow on west face remove 10795 Port-Orford-cedar Chamaecyparis lawsoniana 20 12 0 N 3 2 dense group remove 10796 Port-Orford-cedar Chamaecyparis lawsoniana 18........... 12 0 N 3 2 dense group remove 10797 Port-Orford-cedar Chamaecyparis lawsoniana 20 121.. 0 N 3 2 dense group remove 10798 Port-Orford-cedar Chamaecyparis lawsoniana 22 14 0 N 3 2 dense group,codominant leaders remove 10799 Port-Orford-cedar Chamaecyparis lawsoniana 2211 12 O N 3 2 some crown asymmetry,forked leaders remove , crown dieback,forked leaders,sequoia pitch 10826 lodgepole pine Pinus contorta 12 121 0 N 1 1 moth remove Morgan Molen&Associates.LLC Consulting Arborists and Urban Forest Management 3 Monroe Parkway,Suite P220,Lake Oswego,OR 97035 morgan.holen@comcast.net 1971.409.9354 lit Attachment A:Existing Tree Inventory Data Morgan Nolen MHA17O43 SW 121st Ave Subdivision-Tree Data 8-9-17 Rev.4-7-19.xlsx —8----Q/JOCIAT[,lA, Page 2 of 2 No. Lot Common Name Species Name DBH' C-Rad' Canopy' 0/54 HT' Cond` Pres' Comments Treatment 10836 grand fir Abies grandis 16 9, ' 0 N1 1 dead branches,dieback,adelgid infestation remove crown dieback,multiple leaders,sequoia pitch 10837 lodgepole pine Pinus contorta 14 12 0 N 1 1 moth remove 10911 black locust Robinia pseudoacacia 101 16 0 N 2 1 invasive species remove 11086 1 western hemlock Tsuga heterophylla 161 18 1,018 0 N 3 2 retain 11176 1 Douglas-fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 301 24, 0 0 N 3 2 curb asphalt at base to north remove 11702 3 Port-Orford-cedar Chamaecyparis lawsoniana 181 14 0 S N 3 2 dense group remove 11703 3 Port-Orford-cedar Chamaecyparis lawsoniana 18 14 0 S N 2 2 dense group remove dense group,poor structure,lean,decay, 11704 Port-Orford-cedar Chamaecyparis lawsoniana 6 6 S N 1 1 increased risk remove 11705 Port-Orford-cedar Chamaecyparis lawsoniana 6 6 S N 1 1 dense group,poor structure remove 11706 3 Port-Orford-cedar Chamaecyparis lawsoniana 10 10, 314 S N3 2 dense group retain 11707 3 Port-Orford-cedar Chamaecyparis lawsoniana 10 10 314 S N 3 2 dense group retain 11708 3 Port-Orford-cedar Chamaecyparis lawsoniana 8 10 314 S N 2 2 dense group retain 11709 2 Port-Orford-cedar Chamaecyparis lawsoniana 18 14 616 S N 3 2 dense group retain multiple stems,visual assessment limited by 11710 red alder Alnusrubro 20,,. 24 0 N 2 1 blackberries remove 11711 red alder Alnus rubra 2x20', 24 0 N 2 1 visual assessment limited by laurel hedge remove 4/7/2019 Modification:Changes to the previously approved Urban Forestry Plan are identified in red type. 'DBH is tree diameter measured at 45-feet above the ground level in inches;trees with multiple trunks are measured separately and individual trunk measurements are separated by a comma,except multiple trunks of the same size are indicated as quantity x size. 2C-Rad is the average crown radius measured in feet. 'Canopy is the average tree canopy area(ft)for on-site trees to be retained with Condition and Preservation ratings g2,calculated as:Canopy=(C-Rad)'x n. `0/S identifies the trees as either Open Grown or Stand Grown. 'HT identifies whether or not the tree is a Heritage Tree(either!for yes or(L4 for no). `Coed is the numerical condition rating(0-31 for on-site trees as defined in the Tigard Urban Forestry Manual: RATING VIGOR CANOPY DENSITY DEADWOOD FAILURE HISTORY PESTS DECAY 0 dead to severe decline <30% major scaffold branches >1 scaffold Infested major conks and cavities 1 declining 3060% twig and branch dieback scaffold branches Infested one to a few conks;small cavities 2 average 60-90% small twigs small branches Minor present only at pruning wounds 3 good to excellent 90-100% little or none none None absent to present only at pruning wounds 'Pres is the numerical suitability for preservation rating(0-3)for on-site trees as defined in the Tigard Urban Forestry Manual: RATING CONSIDERATIONS 0 The tree is a"hazard tree as defined in chapter 18.120 of the Tigard Development Code and"hazard tree abatement"as defined in Chapter 18.120 in the Tigard Development Code cannot be completed in a manner that results in tree retention consistent with tree care Industry standards. 1 The tree is dead,in severe decline,or declining but may still be retained if desirable for wildlife or other benefits because it is not considered a"hazard tree"or"hazard tree abatement"could be performed. Thetree has average health and/or structural stability that could be alleviated with treatment;the tree will be less resilient to development impacts and will require more frequent management and monitoring 2 after development than a tree rated as a"3". 3 The tree has good to excellent health and structural stability;the tree will be more resilient to development impacts,and will require less frequent management and monitoring after development than a tree rated as a"2". Morgan Molen&Associates.LLC Consulting Arborists and Urban Forest Management 3 Monroe Parkway,Suite P22O,Lake Oswego,OR 97035 morgan.holen@comcast.net(971,409.9354 Attachment B:Effective Tree Canopy Cover Summary Morgan HoleneMHA17043 SW 121st Ave Subdivision-Tree Data 8-9-17 Rev.4-7-19.xlsx Af/OC.IAT / Page 1 of 1 2x Canopy Area(sq.ft.) 2x Canopy Area(sq.ft.) 1.25 x Mature Mature Canopy 1.25x Mature Effective% Modified of Preserved Trees of Preserved Stands Canopy Area Area(sq.ft.)of Canopy Area Tree Canopy Canopy Original Lot No. Lot Area (w/condition and (w/condition and (sq.ft.)of Native Non-Native (sq.ft.)of Area(sq.ft.) (Canopy Area Lot No. per Final Plat (sq.ft.) preservation rating>2) preservation rating>2) Planted Trees Planted Trees Planted Stands per Lot /Lot Area) Lot 1 15 7,568 0 0 2,121 0 4,157 Lott 14 7,512 1,232 1 0 0 1,414 0 2,646 35.2,,, Lot 3 13 7,512 0 0 1,414 0 3,299 43.9% Lot4 12 7,512 0 0 0 2,121 0 2,121 28.2% Lot 5 11 7,703 0 0 0 4,242 0 4,242 55.1% Lot 6 1 7,666 0 0 2,454 3,535 0 5,989 78.1% Lot 7 2 7,298 0 0 0 1,414 0 1,414 19.4% Lot 8 3 7,298 0 0 0 1,414 0 1,414 19.4% Lot 9 4 7,227 0 0 0 3,535 0 3,535 48.9% Lot 10 5 7,961 2,513 0 0 1,414 0 3,927 49.3% Lot 11 6 7,732 0 0 - 1 1,414 0 3,868 1 50.0% Lot 12 7 7,836 0 0 0 1,414 0 1,414 18.0% Lot 13 8 7,638 0 0 0 2,121 0 2,121 27.8% Lot 14 9 7,466 0 0 0 1,414 0 1,414 18.9% Lot 15 10 7,447 0 0 0 4,242 0 4,242 57.0% Tract B Tract B 6,610 0 0 2,454 0 0 2,454 37.1% Total Development Site 119,986 7,665 0 7,361 33,229 i 0 48,256 1 40.2% 4/7/2019 Modification:Numbers in red type are a reduction/decrease and numbers in blue type are additions/increases from the previously approved Urban Forestry Plan. Notes:Effective tree canopy cover is required to be calculated on a lot/tract by lot/tract basis only in the R-1,R-2,R-3.5,R-4.5 and R-7 districts. The standard percentage of effective tree canopy cover for each lot or tract in the R-1,R-2,R-3.5,R-4.5 and R-7 districts shall be at least 15 percent. The standard percentage of effective tree canopy cover for the overall development site shall be at least: i.40%for 12-1,R-2,R-3.5,R-4.5 and R-7 districts,except for schools(18.130.050(1)); R.33%for R-12,R-25,R-40,C-N,C-C,C-G,C-P,MUE,MUE-1,MUE-2,MUC,MUR and I-P districts,except for schools(18.130.050(1));and iii.25%for MU-CBD,MUC-1,I-L and I-H districts,and for schools(18.130.050(1))in all districts. Morgan tlolen&Associates,LLC Consulting Arborists and Urban Forest Management 3 Monroe Parkway,Suite P220,Lake Oswego,OR 97035 morgan.holen@comcast.net 1971.409.9354 Attachment C:Planted Tree Inventory Morgan Holen y MHA17043 SW 121st Ave Subdivision-Tree Data 8-9-17 Rev.4-7-19.xlsx Af/OGIAICI L Page 1of4 Mature Mature Available Structured Caliper Canopy Spread Canopy Area Soil Volume Soil Volume Lot Tree No. Common Name/Species Name (in.) (ft.) (sq.ft.) (cu.ft.) (cu.ft.) Location No. hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 1 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 1 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 2 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpo 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 1 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 3 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 1 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 4 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpo 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 2 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 5 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 2 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 6 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 3 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 7 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 3 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 8 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 4 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 9 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 4 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 10 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 5 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 11 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 5 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 12 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 5 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 13 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpo 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 5 Morgan Molen&Associates,LLC Consulting Arborists and Urban Forest Management 3 Monroe Parkway,Suite P220,Lake Oswego,OR 97035 morgan.holen c@comcast.net 1971.409.9354 Attachment C:Planted Tree Inventory MHA17043 SW 121st Ave Subdivision-Tree Data 8-9-17 Rev.4-7-19.xlsx MorgaOCLAT./ Page2of4 Mature Mature Available Structured Caliper Canopy Spread Canopy Area Soil Volume Soil Volume Lot Tree No. Common Name/Species Name (in.) (ft.) (sq.ft.) (cu.ft.) (cu.ft.) Location No. hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 14 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 5 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 15 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 5 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 16 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 6 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 17 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 6 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 18 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 6 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 19 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 6 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 20 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 6 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 21 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 7 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 22 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 7 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 23 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 8 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 24 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 8 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 25 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 9 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 26 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 9 Morgan Molen&Associates.LLC Consulting Arborists and Urban Forest Management 3 Monroe Parkway,Suite P220,Lake Oswego,OR 97035 morgan.holen@comcast.net 1971.409.9354 Attachment C:Planted Tree Inventory Morgan I IQlen l� MHA17043 SW 121st Ave Subdivision-Tree Data 8-9-17 Rev.4-7-19.xlsx AJf OCIATCj Page 3 of 4 Mature Mature Available Structured Caliper Canopy Spread Canopy Area Soil Volume Soil Volume Lot Tree No. Common Name/Species Name (in.) (ft.) (sq.ft.) (cu.ft.) (cu.ft.) Location No. hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 27 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 15 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 28 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 15 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 29 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 15 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 30 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 15 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 31 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 15 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 32 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 15 hedge maple/Acer Campestre OR 33 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 14 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 34 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 14 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 35 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 13 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 36 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 13 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 37 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 13 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 38 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 12 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 39 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 12 Morgan flolen&associates,LLC Consulting Arborists and Urban Forest Management 3 Monroe Parkway,Suite P220,Lake Oswego,OR 97035 morgan.holen@comcast.net 1971.409.9354 Attachment C:Planted Tree Inventory Morgan Nolen MHA17043 SW 121st Ave Subdivision-Tree Data 8-9-17 Rev.4-7-19.xlsx __.F__A,/JOCIATU„. Page4of4 Mature Mature Available Structured Caliper Canopy Spread Canopy Area Soil Volume Soil Volume Lot Tree No. Common Name/Species Name (in.) (ft.) (sq.ft.) (cu.ft.) (cu.ft.) Location No. hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 40 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 11 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 41 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' _ 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 11 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 42 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 10 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 43 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 10 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 44 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 9 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 45 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 9 hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 46 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 9 47 Oregon white oak/Quercus garryana 1.5 50 1,963 500+ n/a rear of lot Tract B hedge maple/Acer campestre OR 48 raywood ash/Fraxinus oxycarpa 'Raywood' 1.5 30 707 500+ n/a street 4 49 Oregon white oak/Quercus garryana 1.5 50 1,963 500+ n/a rear of lot 6 50 Oregon white oak/Quercus garryana 1.5 50 1,963 500+ n/a rear of lot 11 Note:Forty-seven(47)street trees are required based on a total of 1,860 lineal feet of street frontage.One additional tree is proposed to satisfy canopy cover requirements for Tract B.4/7/2019 Modification:Two additional trees identified in blue type are proposed to be planted. Morgan tiolen&Associates,LLC Consulting Arborists and Urban Forest Management 3 Monroe Parkway,Suite P220,Lake Oswego,OR 97035 morgan.holen@comcast.net l 971.409.9354 Attachment D: Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan RECEIVED t; '"Y' OF TIGARD MAY 3 0 2019 approved by PI nning CITY OF TIGARD Date: (_C 3 j/ PLANNING/ENGINEERING Initials: I I I I. I I 44444 LEGEND 6�«.. ,Qm Z II O11AE "I}I I I ��m..E EET.� ..,m oy„ao I I X I I ��...�x o I I _ OQ.E.uu,M..E. .� �>��w TRAM 8 It T)SE,,,......-..."-‘r 'AV i,�� - ... oe.raeero,mr j O F%pV," `/ 5 ' F F niirar su ,s'.;..1‘..1,1-,i,".....1491"P12 7J62 3 TREE PROTECTION NOTES: olaEm.r lE �. � eE,E.ME. PROTEL.T.S. !� OE MP T aN:EPRE,NME TIP TREES INT NOT BE UM.. r EpnI` ._ ONIALECT THE a T PRIOR Io e...R TEAM PRMa,�P. Ne�1d Z I I p.c. O F I13�. TNT u +¢i a NOc R F N 11 ".70.1131.'"'17.1010711:1151 ) NI nc moc E x In. a .P uo 11,0.17 s )Slp s w.®�.o.uemsv M.� ¢J PROTECT.FENE.col C4> I MEC.Sit.IC PST..PPS.OF.T.PRO.. TREE PROTECTION FENCING NOTE: j __ '+____. P.P.PROTECTION FOR wT.OIWORT NOI"0ni"'°'AMC ai O CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE MTM - L_—_J J�! 1p1y'�"<a A STRAP WT.MO nWE IT i W g y PROJECT ARBORIST PRIOR TO AD.NSTNG r ry—� �y' aIll TREE PROTECTION FENCING FOR I Wla i CC CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS I I 7r 'r J+ 1 PRECORSTR.11.CO...TIE PRPOST WORM S.P.EC OM STE TO DIT.00...;,,,SOF MI RENO.TEO En PROM. iii w Q IN F-a 0 7.ms RJ]s ----- PECON P.oe .Ream. •RunT ana r: _ 1 PP▪P.SNAP RC M.O.PE A P.M TREE SEW. �.� a,T eM.M.M 1, 3 7Ti PROTECTEDi r_ IESCTO TREES OF I I�I g I I g I 9 IS I [/ ..::w PEPOsO Ez aeR bre ears �▪Nim M'lluemR�. Me aTwne TREES SM. E I • 7.767s T2STS ).151s 72MsTEC.CAL SUPERMON.PIE M.. ) \� SYS NNnrs) MT.OR.IMRE . ROCT TO RA.1.OR.AS NM.SURFENTO Y.INPUTE 1 .6 1.-.............4.4 •LITO PROW.KNOW MO TO NOP.C.S1.1001 ANTO __J I LRQ Npqy.. J ®�iiff, J k ASP.T. 1. siRvmsw. 9 1,4__________rww -m N.r E P.N.NC.Mt i l / .r;,:, '1 TRIPE.OF PROTECTED TIPS OUT NOT 101.1.P.M.TREE - , fir b SW PENN STREET r - —b I m,111.asPPP eouM'M B : TREE PROTECT.IT...PIE RRO.7 PASCOST SM.INSPECT TIC SOCA.I1 Pi .TIMM PF.10 ,,,,M j\all '' ORIMINISS 0,PRO..TR. �' PTARIE.APO MN E .R.PIP.P0 P,E L. i --1 f,� • __7I "` . pct. :,= P110.1•IPPOITST..MSC,A MAL REPO.1.t COMES 7 , 4 I .. TC 11 s Pr.ro a.ETaN NO PROTECT Ice ROW. 'No s I 5 gl AI zPI j PC 111.3 I �j Y IF� ).soo sF ),soO sF T. CREPT L. r/ __ _ �'�: J L�` 1 L ARBORIST STATEMENT: 1 any • L , 4� _— ___-_ r i 6.« _ .._.t w.wx PUP•E'"S`w.wiMr wm e jilte�, iii..,a "=" �:�',,,: OIMCIITs scm,a I.Of DIE an Or r zl ����7I Pp" II ,a ,NRIM 8 PP TREE PSC m Zi 3..3.3.-32,3,33,-u..nl.vw-3.333-3n mr.Rm....... ,......w....,wTae.snim:.Csrr..a Attachment E: Tree Canopy Site Plan RECEIVED CITY OF TIGARD MAY 30 2019 A p p ro v e d by /Plqnning CITY OF TIGARD Date: PLANNING/ENGINEERING Initials: li i Li 1 1 1 I ENanvo°i I 1 1 1 1 lidi I H 1 1 1 AC I 1/1 1 A g r. .7-- .te. lt, ;alsoso.se.ozasau.e 4 -- En0-2, P.I_OPIIW 6 WO,•"`"E."''''''''''';'1/ , 112107 01•611 1' ‘"22-'5,1til.P're r'''' ,//;°,0°217 •BIZ SE I 1 r. ,7,a 1 iiria ''''',* 1 •,',- - ,- : ,, 7-.3 13,-. 1,, LEGEND C-13 S.017 g ,„,* I , SS 1Ep "flI t I , 8 casraly oecoxyus ma Fa et. ct Z -I H 1111111..2,111'Ir t'2- ,.e' MOT moramo mne <p_ 0 IlEiIll 1 Mill 11Pr.sar somas It 0301 4 ''Is' r\ 11 Eta 501•2114 •P) MO SF 1 / , ,--, / I 0 I Pfau.Y. 2.00C h20U on anowo A. , 1,I.• 1 i j ,---,, • __ 2,2 11 __ ,' s -- i, 0 :40 P.L1950 ma ogoxre kmor au g 1 11.11.'•" 7.253 g"I'' I 2 BBB XY 6 I MI SF 9 I, • •,; 1 7.2411P O, =SF :=7 =- = " I ▪ !, "1-'-2r 41..',I'S,'R 1NOWTE0S 10 OMB BEE 0.0004 UMW.WW1.511...MAME 10 A rd 11g -c mow cr 302100209 MO Mall.WM WPM 1012,01.1002.00•42040101.5 WALL Of OfTERIANEE BY Mr 1.01050.10E 00110041101 ' ' tel'- I 2.‘ A ,22' \ ..,Z. ....j.-L,..--Z:-a-...Z- ii+--- ..-24•-stiEll os--Solr' / 2 laRICATION 10 BE Of502,21•11.0 BB 1NE 1,010BEAFF 011111/10C100 0 5 ▪ e--1,-- [- i '''"--- hil4 . -, ---„- • , ' 1-- ---- - • • - 1 1,_ ---- - 3 MEW IIIEES 11.2 ERE RAN=M Eff,BIE fiBECIVE CNC,BE01011.1.25 512.41.COME01111 10 ME WIXOM SOMIAN5 N PIE TICARO.11.11•01112511. YMCA TEE•90.0.Elf 121.0E0 0 ABCC01010E 111M 0.1102.10111 WON. 522 ^1B",../14,' * '• * 2 P M•0000401•00100B • 4*- 101 A'.. , , , wassICIP 1 - 5.4022.105 Min.(22.22111 sru40•00s MO 11111f PLANING(UM PAR,61 ONO EL017010.1 51,10.5.OBE=022 Inif MOON 2.02BOSEAPE 0101111ECTOES 0.110 R.1,!i:11 1 1 „ •,• r • __ . ....__. ..._ . ...... , - Er• ,, '. 201.05E.SID.WU.BEV IBIE Pfasinnidis OF 111f wasrm Aso..,::, VATI,TATILITA.Mara."4"="'.,LAZT.'m"' 1 I g • MOT 00/101125 0.0 BE MINIM ACLOREING TO 110 100lSEC1400ES SPECSICATICNS WEN•91RECT MI IS PLANT0111101.01 5 Of BM IWO SWAM. 1 Et'2 !?gE 2 •22•F ‘, 1,' '' PkeNG.Oil MI,P''' 2 2 • 2r. 1 PI ' 75110 g I 1,51 s• I 3 TAP sF . /SOO SF I 1157.g II . - • , , I ARBORIST STATEMENT I. 1 :m_I9 ilk ____L __ v .. ________1,,,,tr, _______x, • --- - / - _--,F.....c." _ ., Analno EMI 2 Or'110 012/210 MAIO LOMB lORISIRT 11•01YEL MI 0.".......... , ''''.9' tao ityirte,1 44, I' I 1 norr.0 lorY i 1 044°C(P° 61 1 I A 84 MUM=lin IMIER.0.6/111-.61 84 lan Mk/6660.1011.PLI.E. 7'1 Or 7 11