Loading...
City Council Packet - 08/20/2019 114 $ ". City of Tigard TIGARD Tigard Workshop Meeting—Agenda TIGARD CITY COUNCIL Revised August 19, 2019 to re-order agenda items MEETING DATE AND TIME: August 20,2019 - 6:30 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard -Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 PUBLIC NOTICE: Times noted are estimated. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting.Please call 503-718-2419 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (IUD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments;and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers,it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (1'DD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). VIEW LIVE VIDEO STREAMING ONLINE: http://www.tigard-or.Rov/city hall/council meeting.oho Workshop meetings are cablecast on Tualatin Valley Community TV as follows: Replay Schedule for Tigard City Council Workshop Meetings-Channel 28 'Every Sunday at 12 a.m. 'Every Monday at 1 p.m. •Every Wednesday at 2 p.m. 'Every Thursday at 12 p.m. 'Every Friday at 10:30 a.m. SEE ATTACHED AGENDA City of Tigard rECARD Tigard Workshop Meeting—Agenda m TIGARD CITY COUNCIL Revised August 19, 2019 to re-order agenda items MEETING DATE AND TIME: August 20,2019 - 6:30 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard-Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 6:30 PM 1. WORKSHOP MEETING A. Call to Order-City Council B. Roll Call C. Pledge of Allegiance D. Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 2. JOINT MEETING WITH THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION ON URBAN FORESTRY ISSUES 6:30 p.m. estimated time 3. RECEIVE BRIEFING ON ODOT HWY 217 IMPROVEMENTS 7:30 p.m. estimated time 4. BRIEFING ON THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT SELF-EVALUATION AND TRANSITION PLAN 7:45 p.m. estimated time 5. RECEIVE QUARTERLY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN UPDATE 8:15 p.m. estimated time 6. LAND USE TRAINING 8:45 p.m. estimated time 7. NON AGENDA HEMS 8. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive Session is called to order, the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute.All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 9. ADJOURNMENT 9:30 p.m. estimated time City of Tigard i Tigard Workshop Meeting—Agenda TIGARD TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE AND TIME: August 20,2019 - 6:30 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard-Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 PUBLIC NOTICE: Times noted are estimated. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 503-718-2419 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (1'DD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments;and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers,it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-639-4171, ext. 2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (EDD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). VIEW LIVE VIDEO STREAMING ONLINE: htto://www.tigard-or.gov/citv hall/council meeting.oho Workshop meetings are cablecast on Tualatin Valley Community TV as follows: Replay Schedule for Tigard City Council Workshop Meetings-Channel 28 •Every Sunday at 12 a.m. •Every Monday at 1 p.m. 'Every Wednesday at 2 p.m. •Every Thursday at 12 p.m. •Every Friday at 10:30 a.m. SEE ATTACHED AGENDA 11111 ''' Citi of Tigard Tigard Workshop Meeting—Agenda TIGARD TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE AND TIME: August 20,2019 - 6:30 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard-Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 6:30 PM 1. WORKSHOP MEETING A. Call to Order-City Council B. Roll Call C. Pledge of Allegiance D. Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 2. JOINT MEETING WITH THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION ON URBAN FORESTRY ISSUES 6:30 p.m. estimated time 3. BRIEFING ON THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT SELF-EVALUATION AND TRANSITION PLAN 7:30 p.m. estimated time 4. RECEIVE QUARTERLY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN UPDATE 8:00 p.m. estimated time 5. RECEIVE BRIEFING ON ODOT HWY 217 IMPROVEMENTS 8:30 p.m. estimated time 6. LAND USE TRAINING 8:45 p.m. estimated time 7. NON AGENDA I[EMS 8. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive Session is called to order, the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute.All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 9. ADJOURNMENT 9:30 p.m. estimated time AIS-3924 2. Workshop Meeting Meeting Date: 08/20/2019 Length (in minutes): 60 Minutes Agenda Title: Joint Meeting with the Tigard Planning Commission on Urban Forestry issues Prepared For: Tom McGuire, Community Development Submitted By: Tom McGuire, Community Development Item Type: Joint Meeting-Board or Other Juris. Meeting Type: Council Workshop Mtg. Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE The City Council and Tigard Planning Commission will meet to discuss urban forestry and tree preservation issues. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST No action. Briefing and discussion only. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY At their respective hearings (December 17, 2018 and March 19, 2019) to consider updates to the Administrative rules for the Urban Forestry Manual, both the Tigard Planning Commission and the City Council were given a brief evaluation of the Urban Forestry Program, seven years after its adoption. Both the Council and the Planning Commission raised questions and concerns during their briefings and expressed a desire to take more time to explore problem areas in the Urban Forestry Program. This meeting will allow the Council and Planning Commission to have an opportunity to discuss policy issues related to urban forestry and provide direction to staff regarding information gaps, policy direction, and further research necessary to make any identified improvements to the Urban Forestry Program. OTHER ALTERNATIVES COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS Urban Forestry Master Plan (2009) DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION March 19, 2019 Attachments Tree Issues Memo City of Tigard TIGARD Memorandum To: Tigard Planning Commission and Tigard City Council From: Tom McGuire,Assistant Community Development Director Re: Urban Forestry and Tree Protection Discussion Session Date: July 31, 2019 At the March 19, 2019 City Council Workshop Meeting, Planning staff presented proposed updates to the Administrative rules for the Urban Forestry Manual (UFM). The Tigard Planning Commission (Commission) held a hearing on December 17, 2018 to consider the same set of UFM amendments. Also at those meetings, the Commission and the City Council were given a brief update/evaluation of the Urban Forestry Program, seven years after its adoption. Both the Council and the Commission raised questions and concerns during their briefings and expressed a desire to take more time to explore problem areas identified in the Urban Forestry Program. Planning staff will lead a discussion on forestry and tree protection issues at the August 18 joint meeting of the Council and the Commission. Principle among the issues identified at previous meetings are two tree protection related issues detailed below. The Council and Commission may want to open the joint session with a general discussion and identification of issues beyond the two described below, followed by a focused policy discussion. • Protection for identified Significant Tree Groves (STGs). The City implemented a voluntary incentive program for the protection of STGs with the adoption of the Urban Forestry Program. To date, no development applicant has taken advantage of the incentives provided by the program, and where development has taken place in or near an STG the trees have been removed. The incentive program does not seem to provide enough incentive to be considered worth taking advantage of by developers. The Council and Commission may consider exploring additional options for incentives or potentially,consider a regulatory approach that provides better protection for STGs. • Protection for substantial individual trees. The development community and Tigard citizens seem to be responding favorably to the canopy coverage based forestry program that was implemented in 2013. There are few complaints about the process and it seems to be working in that development is resulting in tree planting that meets our standards. However, the canopy cover focus leaves mature individual trees at risk and we are seeing some substantial specimens being removed and replaced with new trees. The Council and Commission may want to discuss the merits of providing protection for individual trees of some defined significance. We have recently adopted regulations in the Tigard Triangle that are different than the urban forestry program's canopy requirements. The Triangle regulations are focused on protections for specific individual oak trees that were identified through an inventory of Triangle properties. Oaks were identified through a public process as an iconic species within the Triangle. AIS-3941 3. Workshop Meeting Meeting Date: 08/20/2019 Length (in minutes): 15 Minutes Agenda Title: Receive Briefing on ODOT Hwy 217 Improvements Prepared For: Lori Faha, Public Works Submitted By: Lori Faha, Public Works Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: Council Workshop Mtg. Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Briefing from Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) on plans for Highway 217 improvements including replacement of Hall Boulevard crossing over Hwy 217. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST No action is requested; the purpose of this item is to brief council and provide an opportunity for council to ask questions and provide comments to ODOT staff. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY ODOT handouts about the Highway 217 Auxiliary Lanes project are attached. ODOT staff will also bring a PowerPoint presentation. The project is designed to improve safety and help prevent bottlenecks on a 4-mile stretch of highway in Tigard and Beaverton. The project includes replacing the Hall Boulevard crossing over the highway. ODOT is proposing a 6 to 7 month closure of Hall Boulevard during construction,with Greenburg Road as the primary detour route. ODOT also has considered options that would provide for a shorter closure period, or maintain Hall Blvd partially open over a longer period of time, but these options have technical and significant cost implications. The project is also expected to include sound walls along sections of the highway between Hall Blvd and Greenburg Road to reduce noise for neighbors. Construction of the project is planned to start in summer 2021,with completion in 2023. ODOT and city staff are also working on coordinating schedules as much as possible between the Highway 217 project and the city's North Dakota Street Bridge replacement project, as those projects are anticipated to have overlapping construction schedules. OTHER ALTERNATIVES None COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS NA DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION None. Attachments ODOT OR217 factsheet ODOT Hall Overcrossing Factsheet Schedule Public engagement throughout project OR Improving safety and QY AUXILIARY ANES travel reliability 2017 2018 2019 a 2020 2021 Aeialk OninignionMEEMMEMOOKAOninin Spring 2019 Design: Open house: Open house: Design: Open house: Construction The OR 217 Auxiliary Lanes Project will improve "°' Begins Design progress Design progress Final Pre-construction Ends 2023 safety and help prevent bottlenecks on a four-mile ``" o (May 2018) (May 21,2019) stretch of OR 217 between Beaverton-Hillsdale Highway and OR 99W.Adding new auxiliary lanes, or on-ramp to off ramp connections,reduces 1IL._ „� , -4Construction preview Sound waif,- merging slow-downs and gives drivers more time to , . c=s Construction is expected to begin in 2021 and Our recent noise study found that new sound make lane changes.The project will also add a new .tea frontage road,replace a major bridge structure and -".'7,-,:.-" continue through 2023.Likely impacts include: walls could help reduce highway noise for project „arm. - , " neighbors.Those residents who would benefit from a add strategic bicycle and pedestrian improvements. Lane and interchange ramp closures on OR 217 ,-,y.- � liYec -16 sound wall will have a say in whether new sound walls • Construction noise are built.Information about the decision process for What does this mean for drivers? ..• `-s • Lane closures on some local roads sound walls will be shared in late spring 2019. Drivers making local trips can avoid merging into ON 1 � highway traffic and instead use the new auxiliary • ODOT is committed to keeping you informed.We Funding lanes to reach their destinations.This also reduces will share progress and respond to questions with These safety improvements are primarily funded via bottlenecks for drivers already on the highway.See the tools including: the 2017 Keep Oregon Moving legislation. map inside for more details about which interchanges Email newsletters will be connected by the new auxiliary lanes. • • j• • Direct outreach to nearby neighborhoods iIt. Project neer) prr cs,er,A„eso and businesses e • * '4 _ OR 217 between Beaverton and Tigard has 10 d g ' ' t „N` t . a ' °".` • • Updates to wwotlinecheck.com for lane closures ` 4 1 'i "1 ,” interchanges in just over seven miles and some of .� ,-,-7.7t4` . - ` r t the shortest merging spacing in the region.The • Construction hotline Maj ( I interchange spacing,combined with 120,000 vehicles - . ' .z .. • Website updates at www.hwy217.orq .._./4, 11. u i a day,leads to high crash rates and travel delays. #,) The interchanges at Allen Boulevard and Denney2 Road are some of the worst bottleneck locations. ' This project will help minimize bottlenecks and help _.--- -_. .. Stay Informed everyone on OR 217 get where they need to go. ODOT will continue to share information,gather feedback and answer questions. Project benefits Please stay involved to learn about design progress,public meetings and future construction impacts. VIS''' the project website at www.hwy217.orq • The addition of new auxiliary lanes help • New pedestrian and bicycle improvements prevent bottlenecks that cause congestion enhance local neighborhoods and expand SIGN U€'to receive email alerts on the project website and crashes,which create delays for travelers routes for pedestrians and people on bikes. CONTAC ODOT directly:Lili Boicourt,ODOT Community Affairs and freight. Phone:503-731-8247 Email:Lili.D.Boicourt@odot.state.or.us • A new frontage road for southbound drivers connecting Allen Boulevard and Denney /Habla espanol?Podemos proveer la information en esta publication en Road will make local trips safer and easier. espanol.Para recibir la information en espanol por favor Ilame(503)731-4128. For Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA)or Civil Rights Title VI accommodations and/or translation/interpretation services,(503)731-4128, 7rep ,tment regon ore9o^,p„gym,,,, Learn more by visiting the project website at www.hwy217.orq TTY(800)735-2900 or Oregon Relay Service 7-1-1. of Transportation „,.,,,,p,,,,,,, _map_ Project What are auxiliarylanes T Beaverton Hillsdale Highway �— �o ''N_HILLSDALEHwr and how will they improve A Pedestrian and bicycle improvements travel on OR 217? This project also includes R�AV E R TQ� Auxiliary lanes separate the slower vehicles �' ® targeted improvements to entering or exiting the highway from higher ,# local bicycle and pedestrian speed vehicles continuing to drive along the Nis , routes,in partnership with City highway.They allow for more stable flow of ALLEN BLVD Allen Blvd \ RAMPS 'ImpFanno of Beaverton and Washington traffic at interchanges.ODOT expects the To BE Q Creek County,including: project to reduce the number of crashes in the I :movED Trail + ® Extend Fanno Creek Trail area by separating the weaving and merging Travelers will-� 0 along the east side of lane from the rest of the highway. use this new frontage ,,d\ DENNEYRD OR 217 up to Allen Denney Rd road to travel from ', 0 Boulevard.This connection Example illustration of an auxiliary lane Allen Boulevard to Q Denney Road 0 ,$ completes the OR 217 MULTIPLE ' �4, parallel bike path 4, network from OR 99W to INTERCHANGE �'' AUXILIARY LANE a( Fanno H Allen Boulevard. Hall Blvd(north structure) Creek O' Trail Widen sidewalk on Mao not to scale north side of Denney Road 0 from Fanno Creek Trail to ••. `�:. V SW 105th Avenue. P „-t elements ( ' 0 Build sidewalks and bike Major elements of the OR 217 Auxiliary O ' �"' "" Scholls Ferry Rd Lanes Project inlude: lanes on Hall Boulevard 0 1 from Cascade Avenue ••-0 ' Add southbound auxiliary laneCc to Scholls Ferry Road. NOT TO SCALE:For illustrative purposes only. from Beaverton-Hillsdale Highway , Construction will depend 1 toOR99W. W a on funding availability. Details about new auxiliary i 2 Add northbound auxiliary lanes from i co lanes on OR 217 Green urg Rd J OR 99W to Scholls Ferry Road. a 2 J Southbound travelers: 0 Replace the Allen Boulevard • A fully-connected auxiliary lane from southbound on-ramp and the Denney 't. O Beaverton-Hillsdale Highway to OR 99W will f + tel Road southbound off-ramp with 5 PFAFFl allow drivers to cross multiple interchanges uth Sttocto a frontage road to allow drivers to F S without merging into OR 217 traffic. \vdlso more safely travel south from Allen ```Q0 • A new frontage road between Allen Boulevard Na�B �� Boulevard to Denney Road. ' — and Denney Road allows drivers to bypass 0 Replace the Hall Boulevard overpass Cird OR 217 entirely. 99 W between OR 99W and Waffle Street, including new sidewalks and bike lanes. Northbound travelers: k_.-- dr • A new auxiliary lane will connect OR 99W to Potential sound walls to reduce noise TI G A R D .. Greenburg Road. NOT TO SCALE: For illustrative 2' for project neighbors. • A second auxiliary lane will continue purposes only. 0 Widen three ramps:the Denney Road LEGEND _ past OR 99W all the way to Scholls Ferry southbound on-ramp,the Scholls Road,allowing drivers to cross multiple LEGEND Southbound auxiliary lane MI New frontage road Ferry northbound off-ramp and the interchanges without merging into Southbound auxiliary lane in New frontage road Northbound auxiliary lane MR Pedestrian and bike improvements OR 99W northbound off-ramp. Potential sound wall El Ramp widening OR 217 traffic. Northbound auxiliary lane 1 Summer 2019 R _ ..,. rt s 0 SW Hall Boulevard Overcrossing AUXIhIA ` x . LANES, , Construction Options Opt . 5 O Option 2 TAA5ta qe:i Nti Full Closure Construction` „i;t,,+,1; ,, ° ° ° (Temp Bike/Ped Bridge) Et , '///."///. IMM MR RECOMMENDATIOI" Replacing the Hall Boulevard Overpass between OR 99W and Pfaffle St. is a key element of the OR 217 Auxilliary Lane project.The full closure construction method is recommended based on the moderate level of local area traffic impacts, improved quality of construction, improved safety,and lower costs. Keeping Bike/Ped access reduces impacts to transit users. Improved Quality + Schedule Savings Alternative Routes Building the bridge without staging for traffic increases the Manage traffic impacts through use of parallel routes,targeted outreach and quality and shortens the construction duration. local agency coordination. ■■■■ Option 1 rfi 90 days : Project map 10 BEAVERTON-HILLSDALE HWY rststrian and t le imp t1Qt1ts B E A V®E R T O N This project also includes targeted improvements to local bicycle and pedestrian ALLEN BLVD routes,in partnership with City RAMPS AL BLVD of Beaverton and Washington \ TO BE Fdn EMOVEf � Creek County,including: ® l —Trail Extend Fanno Creek Trail Travelers will --• Y 0 along the east side of use this new frontage DENNEY Rti OR 217 up to Allen road to travel from Allen Boulevard to Boulevard.This connection Denney Road 4 completes the OR 217 rr" parallel bike path DENNEY RL, network from OR 99W to Fanno ,) Allen Boulevard. *—Creek 5 Trail Widen sidewalk on `.?op not to sco!_ }' north side of Denney Road from Fanno Creek Trail to SW 105th Avenue. Major elements of the OR 217 Auxiliary Build sidewalks and bike Lanes Project include: 0 lanes on Hall Boulevard from Cascade Avenue Add southbound auxiliary lane to Scholls Ferry Road. from Beaverton-Hillsdale Highway Construction will depend to OR 99W. on funding availability. 2 Add northbound auxiliary lanes from C: OR 99W to Scholls Ferry Road. 2 -i Replace the Allen Boulevard 5 southbound on-ramp and the Denney Road southbound off-ramp with 5 r'n�ft-1`` a frontage road to allow drivers to <. ,_ more safely travel south from Allen Boulevard to Denney Road. N--0 Replace the Hall Boulevard overpass 99 between OR 99W and Pfaffle Streeti , including new sidewalks and bike lanes. 5 Potential sound walls to reduce noise T I G A R D al for project neighbors. V 1� 0 Widen three ramps:the Denney Road LEGEND southbound on-ramp,the Scholls Southbound auxiliary lane New frontage road Ferry northbound off ramp and the Northbound auxiliary lane Pedestrian and bike improvements Potential sound wall ® Ramp widening '� Oregon ment Learn more by visiting the project website at www.hwy217.orci of Transportation 8 U a W NN-NN c„ Bridge C • AUXAh LANES & Sound Walls _,... ., ]7rranspoatio regon Project Update to Tigard City Council (� www.hwy217.org N E�EES A OOWL LLC Company s August 20, 2019 Project Update Overview • Project Overview • SW Hall Boulevard Overcrossing Options • Sound Walls 8/20/2019 OR \` JJ/r Oregon OBEC 2 AUXILIARYL N J L Department Rib of Transportation A oowi LLC Company Project Overview RTC) Htl E c 7p °1BFAVEk, . DALEHWY Beaverton-Hillsdale Highway A /1N BEAV,fRTON cip OD Y ,ALLEN BLVL / • Fanno 0 Creek Allen Blvd ;,, Trail © 1 ` DENNEY RD 1 0 ��y . Denney Rd 0 w 1 Fanno� Creek : .Q Trail Hall Blvd(north structure) 1 Scholls Ferry Rd y " 1 L. n ? I JS �� Green urg Rd 1 1I N. ctotel \ S--0 ouchsctu \ R mil , kA g`J0°415%„,, ls 1” I" 99W TIGARD L 1OT TO SCALE, oRIti- liSpgx,... w qsi2oi2o�9 AUXILIARY LANES � ��� � 3 of Transportation A DOW.LLC Company Project Overview (cont. ) _.,,„_, ,.,_. ,. . ,,,., Schedule 2017 2018 2019 �cer� 2020 2021 (>IIIIIIIIIg 0 111111111111111111111111111111 0 0 ''':0 Design: Open house: Open house: Design: Open house: Construction Begins Design progress Design progress Final Pre-construction Ends 2023 (May 2018) (May 21,2019) Public engagement throughout project 8/20/2019 OR Tpg:.. ren OBEC C.' 4 AUXILIARY 1NetntTransportation A DO WL LLC Company SW Hall Boulevard Overcrossing Existing . . Structure its R3' x A f ...... iki,,,,,,i i „*... 3%. •.:..0:....,f..r.. , .a`4'.14,,0 r, s .!4'}.. � J 1111111111111111r'"'!' „ at ..:""; ': mow„ w,„ ;:.,.. a .G 1 +sd� - .,':tea. � � ��� a... .,°' .,G : '''a� "'�� �,.. .4,'-'-,',"'f, �� dr J I fix, f ". 1 d' y y, r•:' 1•. .sem""... ...ry mm...w..�. S ¢w."N^` ..... .... ... . �I• C a • I 8/20/2019 ORf:''., OBEC 5 AUXILIARY LANES ]7tm17:ecga:;.;'7;,,,,:tation ` A DOWL LLC Company SW Hall Boulevard Overcrossing New Overpass Structure Proposed Hall Boulevard overpass configuration .,..... , 4.— .r) 1 1 . .. NNI i 4 ft t t t t 7' 12' 14' 12' 7' Sidewalk Travel lane Median Travel lane Sidewalk 5' 5' Shoulder/ Shoulder/ bike lane bike lane 8/20/2019 OR'21.7 .„. ON 6 AUXILIARY LAN ES IMF:Z.. imb A DOWL LIC Company SW Hall Boulevard Overcrossing Construction Options 11 ate Option 1 • \4 Staged Construction lit 0 Option 2 'Ili aeldf Vehicle Detours, ' ° ° Temp Bike/Ped Bridge iVAFAIT'TMIMI . ' . Option 3 VI Full Closure with Accelerated Bridge v-' via Construction (ABC) OR\y'�t regon k 8/20/2019 AUXILIARY LANE ]]fl :: ation N\ A°OWL LLC Company OOption 2 ;,,,n1; Vehicle Detours, Recommended Option Temp Bike/Ped Bridge Considerations Option 1 : Option 2: Option 3: Staged Vehicle Detour, ABC Construction Temp Ped Br. Cost Estimate $8.7M $7.1M $10.1M Construction Duration 9-11 months 6-7 months 4-5 months Hall/Pfaffle Intersection 4-5 months 6-7 months 4-5 months Closed Full Closures of OR 217 10 nignts 7 nights 10 nights 8/20/2019 OR217 ll�regon �C 8 AUXILIARY LANES J Department of Transportation A DOM.UC Company el) Option 2 Ve eDetours, SW Hall Boulevard Overcrossing ° Temp Bike/Ped Bridge Vehicle Detour Open to Bikes and Pedestrians Signed Detour Route Manage traffic impacts through use of parallel routes,targeted outreach and local agency coordination. 1 nr!►cT cT r OAK ST m •' ¢ � Signed Detour Route m ® Road Closed ® ® Proposed Closure i LAO Local Access Only .*""-LE ST ( ) Temporary pedestrian and bicycle bridge during constrution O Intersection identified for tirn O signal modification 0 0 99W OR '21 \ Oregon ON ( r 8/20/2019 AUXILIARY LANES, �� °apartment ` 9 of Transportation a Howl LLC comp,Ay Option 2 ° Vehicle Detours, SW Hall Boulevard Overcrossing Temp Bike/Ped Bridge � rrrs Vehicle Detour Signed Route Mitigation No Scale • Adjustments to Traffic Signals _ along Greenburg Road to Washington g Square avoid significant delays along - LOCUST ST signed detour route I OAK ST — e • No Adjustments to Traffic I SPRUCE ST Signals along OR 99W to avoid encouraging neighborhood diversion << '' PFAFFLE ST iv GRfENe% 4b \� Lgr *Al NC 8/20/2019 08 OR / Oregon Mt 10 AUXILIARY LANES 1 L Department ` of Transportation A nowt LLC Company Sound Walls • 4.,.. • #1 : AlongNB OR 217 near Hall -' '�` t , ' 144.,- c : Boulevard Bridge (south structure) ,J,, f • #2: Along SB OR 99W to NB OR , ' 217 on-ramp • #3: AlongSB OR 217 between pf J "Greenburg Road and Hall t' - . -'' , °�F' ' =, °° . ° s`^ >�5' . %.., , i , S� Chestnut:t Boulevardr� 10� - / ti L_nn in,t .��•reAr s 5� • #4: Along NB OR 217 near Hall r � _ L J � ° ,ta ill, = M' d-. 4�4r d : '.� "; I,t, .."LiY- ..'. c Boulevard Bridge (north structure) - �, 1•} , z• ., : - • . ,� '' #1 • Sound Walls will only be ,: Questions? Stay Informed ODOT will continue to share information, gather feedback and answer questions. Please stay involved to learn about design progress, public meetings and future construction impacts. VISIT the project website at www.hwy217.orq SIGN UP to receive email alerts on the project website CONTAC ODOT directly: Lili Boicourt, ODOT Community Affairs Phone: 503-731-8247 Email: Lili.D.Boicourtqiodot.state.or.us 8/20/2019 ORIII . Tr-pmen, OHEC RIW 12 AUXILIARY LANES of Transportation A DOWL LLC Company 1 i t Public engagement throughout projectoR —2 .,,, e �' , SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET 7�, AUXILIARY- FOR 1aat)ltq;t.fex -3 - co=i 2017 2018 2019 P�� 2020 2021 OF MEETING} Spring 2019 Design: Open house: Open house: Design: Oper. house: Constructior, a The OR 217 Auxiliary Lanes Project will improve ' :;§"';'-A; 7-: Begins Design progress Design prc*g; -ss Final Pre-construction Ends 2023 ,; .�. r. 4 = - . (Cv1ay 2018) E safety and help prevent bottlenecks on a four-mile _ Utz • �bNb, •• �v-7�,,- ' «�Qy 2�,,x!77� _ x stretch of OR 217 between Beaverton-Hillsdale Be rton dale ,- ?: - _�.<. .� F a., ..• Highway and OR 99W. Adding new auxiliary lanes, x ' ,Jif, .„ca r ` r .:• 71;;':;,-- or on-ramp to off-ramp connections, reduces „ t,�, ' . . l' trtic ;ion preview ourid merging slow-downs and gives drivers more time to , .f- '-;a= �'" - :-4 Construction is expected to begin in 2021 and Our recent noise study found that new sound make lane changes.The project will also add a new - - ..q 1 frontage road, replace a major bridge structure and b,;_ ,, , ' continue through 2023. Likely impacts include: walls could help reduce highway noise for project ,� add strategic bicycle and pedestrian improvements. ,....lt= What are auxiliary lanes Beaverton-Hillsdale Highway BEAVERTON HILLSDALE HWY 01:7) rt- 3 .�, and how will they improve APedestrian and N bicycle improvementc travel on OR 217? B EA�E (�TO rt This project also includes Auxiliary lanes separate the slower vehicles fil) ff ® targeted improvements to entering or exiting the highway from higher local bicycle and pedestrian speed vehicles continuing to drive along the A.I t EN BLVD routes,in partnership with City hi hwa .The allow for more stable flow of ALLEN B► �!! g y y Allen Blvd \ Fanno of Beaverton and Washington traffic at interchanges. ODOT expects the • "a Creek County,including: project to reduce the number of crashes in the •—e Trail ® Extend Fanno Creek Trail area by separating the weaving and merging Travelers will ♦ along the east side of lane from the rest of the highway. use this new frontage OR 217 up to Allen Denney Rd road to travel from Boulevard.This connection Example illustration of an auxiliary lane \I Allen Boulevard to t a Denney Road ° :' ;. completes the OR 217 MULTIPLE c ice, parallel bike path , network from OR 99W to INTERCHANGE DENNEY RD AUXILIARY LANE I( ri Allen Boulevard. Fanno Hall Blvd (north structure) Creek ( ^4,-,,o r f-t to s co'2 [C Trail Widen sidewalk on - north side of Denney Road from Fanno Creek Trail to SW 105th Avenue. Ale Major elements of the OR 217 Auxiliary Build sidewalks and bike r c. Scholls Ferry Rd Lanes Project include: lanes on Hall Boulevard from Cascade Avenue Add southbound auxiliary lane to Scholls Ferry Road. NOT TO SCALE:For illustrative purposes only. I it yr I from Beaverton-Hillsdale Highway - Construction will depend 1 to OR 99W. on funding availability. Details about new auxiliary i • 2 Add northbound auxiliary lanes from lanes on OR 217 Greenburg Rd NAL ler OR 99W to Scholls Ferry Road. 2 Southbound travelers: Replace the Allen Boulevard 5 • A fully-connected auxiliary lane from southbound on-ramp and the Denney Beaverton-Hillsdale Highway to OR 99W will Road southbound off-ramp with 5 allow drivers to cross multiple interchanges St�Ucturel a frontage road to allow drivers to without merging into OR 217 traffic. d5outh more safely travel south from Allen 5 • A new frontage road between Allen Boulevard Na\N°NI ♦ ♦\ Boulevard to Denney Road. fit— a and Denney Road allows drivers to bypass I Replace the Hall Boulevard overpass 99W OR 217 entirely. 9 W I between OR 99W and Pfaffle Street, including new sidewalks and bike lanes. Northbound travelers: CED • A new auxiliary lane will connect OR 99W to I NOT TO SCALE: 5 Potential sound walls to reduce noise ,, • Greenburg Road. .,„ For illustrative for project neighbors. • A second auxiliary lane will continue purposes only. 0 Widen three ramps:the Denney Road LEGEND past OR 99W all the way to Scholls Ferry southbound on-ramp,the Scholls Road, allowing drivers to cross multiple LEGEND Southbound auxiliary lane New frontage road Ferry northbound off-ramp and the interchanges without merging into Southbound auxiliary lane New frontage road Northbound auxiliary lane Pedestrian and bike improvements OR 99W northbound off-ramp. Potential sound wall Ramp widening OR 217 traffic. Northbound auxiliary lane Summer 2019 :� � ..,,,..,-,*,,,y, :::;;;;:;??!: SW Hall Boulevard Overcrossing f p� � Construction Options w x 0 Option 2 j1 PA Full Closure Construction ° ° (Temp Bike/Ped Bridge) — ItECOPAIVIEND A 11 t, €;' Replacing the Hall Boulevard Overpass between OR 99W and Pfaffle St. is a key element of the OR 217 Auxilliary Lane project.The full closure construction method is recommended based on the moderate level of local area traffic impacts, improved quality of construction,improved safety,and lower costs. Keeping Bike/Ped access reduces impacts to transit users. Improved Quality + Schedule Savings Alternative Routes Building the bridge without staging for traffic increases the Manage traffic impacts through use of quality and shortens the construction duration, parallel routes,targeted outreach and local agency coordination. ■ ■a Option 1 ��� �'�"�' Staged: 9-11 months of construction schedule savings ■ ai®; Option 2 with full closure vs. 'is■ , Full Closure:6-7 months staged construction Option 2:Reduces the mama Option3 number of OR 217 closures ; Full Closure with ; during bridge construction. ABC: 4-5 months 217 Work Cost Savings Zone OPTION 2:Full ; Safety closure costs –20%less , 1110 o Improved than staged construction,and 30% o worker less than ABC approach.Up to $1.6M ,, safety by reducing in project savings with a full closure. 9.4.9 contractor exposure 41— Signed Detour Route to live traffic while Know before you go! „.1 Road Closed constructing the Traffic signal timing will be : Proposed Closure modified to avoid significant new bridge. delays on the detour routes. 7 2, Access Only eroref > Temporarypedestrian and Travel times on local roads bicycle bridge during constrution nDmay increase by 5 minutes ^, Intersection identified for Oregon or more during peak hours. epartment 7 ii- of Transportation 111111111i{ rt signal modification www.tripcheck.com i'' BF;',VERTON }1ltI.SDALL 110Pr' , Pedestrian and 1 , ti 11 ' bicycle improvements B E A V E R T O N This project also includes ® targeted improvements to local bicycle and pedestrian ALLEN BLVD f routes,in partnership with City ALLEN BLVD of Beaverton and Washington Fanno g Creek County,including: • Trail 217 �' f Extend Fanno Creek Trail Travelers will -• * along the east side of use this new frontage ''-:'. DENNEY RD, . OR 217 up to Allen road to travel fromBoulevard.This connection Allen Boulevard to /� Denney Road V Gt• completes the OR 217 1 . parallel bike path ' / w� �`'�1-4 network from OR 99W to . Fanno 1'` Allen Boulevard. --Creek 5 �a` Trail �j Vr, Widen sidewalk on i lap not to scale ‘ c„," north side of Denney Road from Fanno Creek Trail to SW 105th Avenue. i ' Build sidewalks and bike Major elements of the OR 217 Auxiliary Lanes Project include: �� ;', lanes on Hall Boulevard TM C7 from Cascade Avenue Add southbound auxiliary lane ' e to Scholls Ferry Road. from Beaverton Hillsdale Highway • t CoConstruction will depend to OR 99W. 1 )..1 on funding availability. 2 Add northbound auxiliary lanes from `, 0 on OR 99W to Scholls Ferry Road. 4 2 1 Replace the Allen Boulevard ---f- t southbound on-ramp and the Denney .", e, Road southbound off-ramp with ''' # a frontage road to allow drivers to more safely travel south from Allen Boulevard to Denney Road '4N, � � Replace the Hall Boulevard overpass 99W between OR 99W and Pfaffle Street, including new sidewalks and bike lanes. 5 Potential sound walls to reduce noise i .�j� 2 I for project neighbors. 0 Widen three ramps:the Denney Road LEGEND southbound on-ramp,the Scholls Southbound auxiliary lane New frontage road Ferry northbound offramp and the Northbound auxiliary lane Pedestrian and bike improvements Potential sound wall ®Ramp widening ra°r7men Learn more b visitin the ro ect website at www.hw 217.or y9 p Yr Transportation AIS-3909 Workshop Meeting Meeting Date: 08/20/2019 Length (in minutes): 30 Minutes Agenda Title: Briefing on the Americans with Disabilities Act Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Prepared For: Nadine Robinson, Central Services Submitted By: Nadine Robinson, Central Services Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: Council Workshop Mtg. Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Staff will provide council with a briefing on the draft Americans with Disabilities Act Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST No action is needed during this workshop meeting. The briefing is intended to allow council to ask questions and provide input on the draft ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan and the steps identified to move the plan forward. Feedback from council and the public will be incorporated into the plan. Once that is completed, staff will bring the plan back to city council with a request that the plan be adopted. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY Over the last year, staff have worked with MIG, Inc. to update the city's Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan. This plan, required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), is the first comprehensive evaluation undertaken since the original 1993 plan. The plan demonstrates the City of Tigard's commitment to providing equal access to all its public programs, services, facilities, and activities for citizens with disabilities The project steps have included: •Evaluating services, policies, and practices and identifying the modifications needed to remediate barriers; •Identifying physical obstacles that limit the accessibility of facilities; •Describing the methods to be used to make the facilities accessible; •Providing a matrix or schedule for making modifications to improve access; •Identifying the public officials responsible for implementation of the plan; and •Involving people with disabilities in the preparation of the plan. The process used in the preparation of the ADA self-evaluation included a staff programmatic accessibility questionnaire to determine current levels of service and the extent to which policies and programs could be creating barriers to accessibility for persons with disabilities. Staff provided information on the nature of programs, forms, and methods used to advertise program's services and activities. The transition plan is the result of a detailed audit by the consultant of the City of Tigard's facilities, parks, trails, and city right-of-way. The transition plan outlines the steps the city needs to take to meet the obligations of Title II of the ADA. It also provides a framework for the systematic removal of barriers based on established program priorities. Additionally, the consultant and staff have worked with a citizen focus group to: •Receive input about the barriers the members have experienced when accessing city programs or facilities; •Give the group an opportunity to provide input into the criteria for removal of barriers; and •Encourage members to provide feedback about the plan and recommend modifications. Staff intend to review all barriers during the first three years of the plan's implementation and address those barriers that can be resolved through programmatic modifications and maintenance tasks. Additionally, an ADA barrier removal tracking tool will be developed to track progress on the removal of barriers and to report out to the community on the city's progress. The final ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan will be posted on the city website. City staff will prepare an annual report summarizing the actions taken in the previous year and adjustments made to the plan. The report will be presented to city council and posted on the city website. Substantive updates to the plan document will be posted annually on the city website. OTHER ALTERNATIVES None at this time. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS This project supports City Council Goal 5: Enhance walkability and pedestrian connectivity. Strategy 5.1 Develop an implementation strategy related to the ADA Transition Plan to identify the priorities for curb ramps and public sidewalks that must be repaired or replaced to meet current ADA guidelines. The plan also supports the city's vision to be a community where people of all ages and abilities enjoy healthy and interconnected lives. DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION September 18, 2018 - Staff provided City Council with an update on the progress of the ADA self-evaluation and transition plan project. Attachments ADA draft self evaluation and transition plan ADA transition plan appendices 082019 ADA presentation 11 • N T I GARD Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Public Review Draft June 2019 This page intentionally left blank. Executive Summary In an effort to make the City of Tigard's services, programs, building facilities, parks,trails, and public right-of-way accessible to all, the City has updated its American with Disabilities Act (ADA) Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan.The Plan demonstrates the City of Tigard's commitment to providing equal access to all its public programs, services, facilities, and activities for citizens with disabilities. It is focused on the City's entire inventory of programs and facilities provided to the public.The project steps included: • Evaluating services, policies, and practices; • Identifying modifications needed to services, policies, and practices; • Identifying physical obstacles that limit the accessibility of facilities for individuals with disabilities; • Describing the methods to be used to make the facilities accessible; • Providing a schedule for making modifications to improve access; • Identifying the public officials responsible for implementation of the Transition Plan; and • Involving people with disabilities in the preparation of the Plan. This plan is consistent with the City of Tigard's Strategic Plan vision to become "The most walkable community in the Pacific Northwest,where people of all ages and abilities enjoy healthy and interconnected lives." Project Scope and Plan Development Process The process developed for the preparation of the ADA self-evaluation included an internal programmatic accessibility questionnaire of City staff to determine current levels of service and the extent to which policies and programs could be creating barriers to accessibility for persons with disabilities. Staff provided information on the nature of programs, forms, and methods used to advertise each program's services and activities. A public involvement process assisted in the development of this updated Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan. At the beginning of the project an ADA Focus Group was formed.The Focus Group was introduced to the project and provided input into the barriers they had experienced in City programs and/or facilities, and were given the opportunity to ask questions about the scope of the project. At the next meeting the Focus Group gave input into the criteria for removal of barriers. Additionally, City staff from all departments provided input into the barriers they were working to resolve, those barriers needing attention and ways the city could continue to make progress in removing access barriers. i The Transition Plan is the result of a detailed audit of the City of Tigard's facilities, parks, trails, and city right-of-way.The Transition Plan outlines the necessary steps to meet the obligations of title II of the ADA and will provide a framework for the systematic removal of barriers based on established program priorities. Summary of Findings The results of the self-evaluation showed several areas the City can begin making services, programs and activities more accessible for people with disabilities. Along with providing training for staff on the requirements of the ADA, the City is committed to providing reasonable accommodations to programs and services.The City will continue its ongoing efforts to remove barriers in its facilities, parks, trails and right-of-way. Implementation Plan The City of Tigard has many programmatic and project elements underway that support this plan and the goal of providing accessible programs and connections. A summary of work underway or completed in Fiscal Year 2018/19 follows. Rights of Way(ROW), Parks and Trails • Street system overlays implemented as part of the annual pavement management program include upgrading and replacement of curb ramps that do not meet current Proposed Accessibility Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way (PROWAG). In summer 2018, 40 curb ramps were replaced or upgraded. In summer 2019 it is planned that 16 curb ramps will be replaced. • Public facilities infrastructure permits for development projects that include construction or improvements to City ROW require that applicable facilities meet current ADA/PROWAG requirements. • City capital improvement projects for streets, sidewalks and parks facilities are designed and constructed to applicable ADA standards. In Fiscal Year 2018/19, projects in planning, design or construction with ADA elements included: Hunziker Core/Wall Street,Tech Center Drive, SW 121st Avenue Sidewalks/Bike Lanes, Commercial Street Sidewalk, Durham/Boones Ferry Adaptive Signalization,Tigard Street Heritage Trail and Plaza, Fanno Creek Trail (multiple segments), SW 124th/Ann Culvert Replacement and sidewalk, Main Street Green Street Phase 2,Tiedeman Crossing/Fanno Creek Trail, and Roy Rogers Road. ii City Buildings In 2016 the City completed a condition assessment of its properties that included a high-level evaluation of ADA barriers, which was followed in 2018 by a comprehensive facilities assessment of its properties to determine the presence of ADA barriers. Barrier removal activities since the 2016 evaluations include: • Replacement of the motors in the ADA entry Library doors and adjustment of the closure timing; • Pressure measurement and adjustment of all interior and exterior doors in City facilities; • Grab bars added in women's restrooms; • Addition of ADA accessible public counters in City Hall; and • Installation of ADA compliant counter in Red Rock Creek Conference Room. City Programs • Captioning added to City Council meeting video via U-Tube; • New assistive listening devices purchased; and • Training was provided to Library staff on service animals in City buildings. Next Steps It is the City's intent to review all barriers during the first three years of Plan implementation and address those barriers that can be resolved through programmatic modifications and maintenance tasks. Additionally, an ADA barrier removal tracking tool will be developed to track progress on the removal of barriers and to report out to the community on the City's progress. Reporting and Plan Adjustments The final ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan will be posted on the City website. City of Tigard staff will prepare an annual report summarizing the actions taken in the previous year and adjustments made to the plan.The report will be presented to City Council and posted on the City website. Substantive updates to the plan document will be posted annually on the City website. iii This page intentionally left blank. iv Acknowledgements Many individuals were involved with the development of the City of Tigard's ADA Self- Evaluation and Transition Plan. City Leadership Jason Snider, Mayor Tom Anderson, Councilor John Goodhouse, Councilor Heidi Lueb, Councilor Liz Newton, Councilor Marty Wine, City Manager Former Mayor John Cook Former Councilor Marc Woodard Project Leadership Lori Faha, P.E., City Engineer Nadine Robinson, Central Services Director City Staff Representatives from all departments participated by responding to the ADA programmatic accessibility questionnaire and participating in internal meetings. ADA Focus Group Bob Cerbone Lisa Detweiler Natasha Lynch Vicki March Tristan Roberts Michael Stevens Consultant Team MIG, Inc. 815 SW 2nd Avenue, Suite 200 Portland, OR 97204 V This page intentionally left blank. vi Plan Organization Section 1–Introduction provides an overview of the planning process and the legislative mandate governing the process. Section 2–Self-Evaluation details the evaluation of City policies, services, programs, and activities and is based on responses to a program accessibility questionnaire, which was completed by staff, and a review of City documents and policies. Section 3–Transition Plan describes the evaluation of architectural barriers and is the result of a detailed evaluation of City facilities—such as buildings, parking lots, parks,trails, and public right-of-way—where programs, activities, and services are available to the public. Section 4–ADA Coordinator, Notice Policy, and Grievance Procedure includes the City's notice under the ADA and its ADA Grievance Procedure. Section 5–Definitions and Acronyms defines the commonly used terms and acronyms in this Plan and the ADA. Section 6–Resources contains a directory of disability organizations, guidelines, and resources for addressing the recommendations included in this Plan. vii This page intentionally left blank. viii Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Legislative Mandate 1 1.2 Accessible Programs and Facilities 2 1.3 Discrimination and Accessibility 3 1.4 ADA Self-Evaluation Process 4 1.5 ADA Transition Plan Process 4 1.6 Public Outreach for the Plan 5 2 Self-Evaluation 7 2.1 Programmatic Modifications 7 2.2 Program Accessibility: Required Actions and Implementation Strategies 7 2.3 Services, Policies,and Practices Summary of Recommendations 23 3 Transition Plan 25 3.1 Schedule for Facility Improvements 25 3.2 Accessibility Standards 25 3.3 Facility Evaluations 26 3.4 Public Right-of-Way 35 3.5 Barrier Removal Considerations for Plan Implementation 67 4 ADA Coordinator, Notice Policy, and Grievance Procedure 73 4.1 ADA Coordinator Roles and Responsibilities 73 4.2 Notice Under the Americans with Disabilities Act 73 4.3 ADA Grievance Procedure 74 5 Definitions and Acronyms 77 6 Resources 85 Appendices Appendix A: Public Outreach Appendix B:ADA Facility Barrier Summary Report ix This page intentionally left blank. x City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 1 Introduction The Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA)Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan will support the City of Tigard in fulfilling the requirements set forth in title II of the ADA.The ADA states that a public entity must reasonably modify its policies, practices, and procedures to avoid discrimination against people with disabilities.This Plan will assist the City in identifying policy, program, and physical barriers to accessibility, and will guide the City in developing barrier removal solutions. 1.1 Legislative Mandate The ADA is a comprehensive civil rights law for people with disabilities passed by Congress on July 26, 1990. It provides protection against discrimination in both employment and the provision of goods and services.The purpose of the ADA is to provide a "clear and comprehensive national mandate for the elimination of discrimination against individuals with disabilities." Congress emphasized that the ADA seeks to dispel stereotypes and assumptions about disabilities and to assure equality of opportunity, full participation, independent living, and economic self-sufficiency for people with disabilities. Title II of the ADA covers programs, activities, and services of public entities. Under the requirements of the ADA, No qualified individual with a disability shall, on the basis of disability, be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of the services, programs, or activities of a public entity, or be subjected to discrimination by any public entity.' Under the requirements of the ADA, the City of Tigard may not specifically, either directly or through contractual arrangements • deny persons with disabilities the opportunity to participate as members of advisory boards and commissions; • deny persons with disabilities the opportunity to participate in services, programs, or activities that are offered to others or compel people to participate in separate or different activities based on disability; • make selections in determining the location of facilities that have the effect of excluding or discriminating against persons with disabilities; or • deny access to people with disabilities who require the assistance of a service animal in any area of the City's facilities where the public is normally allowed. 1 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart B§35.130 General prohibitions against discrimination 1 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 Further, title II of the ADA provides that public entities must identify and evaluate all programs, activities, and services and review all policies, practices, and procedures that govern administration of the entity's programs, activities, and services.2 This Plan and certain documents incorporated by reference establishes the City of Tigard's ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan. 1.2 Accessible Programs and Facilities The City, as a public entity, is subject to the ADA's title II Requirements for State and Local Government Programs and Services and is responsible for the provision of accessible programs and facilities that are available without discrimination toward people with disabilities. A fundamental tenet of title II of the ADA is "the principle that individuals with disabilities must be provided an equally effective opportunity to participate in or benefit from a public entity's aids, benefits, and services."3 A public entity's services, programs, or activities, when viewed in their entirety, must be readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities.This principle is referred to as program accessibility.Though it applies to all existing facilities of a public entity, a public entity is not necessarily required to make each of its existing facilities accessible. As a public entity, the City is required to ensure program accessibility for the programs it provides to the public. 1.2.1 Maintaining Accessible Facilities In addition to providing programmatic access, the City is obligated to maintain all accessible facilities in working order. Exceptions are provided for temporary disruptions.The ADA contains the following language regarding the maintenance of accessible features. Public entities must maintain in working order equipment and features of facilities that are required to provide ready access to individuals with disabilities. Isolated or temporary interruptions in access due to maintenance and repair of accessible features are not prohibited. Where a public entity must provide an accessible route, the route must remain accessible and not blocked by obstacles such as furniture,filing cabinets, or potted plants.An isolated instance of placement of an object on an accessible route, however, would not be a violation, if the object is promptly removed. Similarly, accessible doors must be unlocked when the public entity is open for business. Mechanical failures in equipment such as elevators or automatic doors will occur from time to time. The obligation to ensure that facilities are readily accessible to and usable z DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart A§35.105 Self-evaluation 3 ADA Title II Technical Assistance Manual 11-3.3000 2 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 by individuals with disabilities would be violated, if repairs are not made promptly or if improper or inadequate maintenance causes repeated and persistent failures.' 1.3 Discrimination and Accessibility Absence of discrimination requires that both physical and program accessibility are provided. Physical accessibility requires that a facility be barrier-free. Barriers include any obstacles that prevent or restrict the entrance to or use of a facility. Program accessibility requires that individuals with disabilities are provided an equally effective opportunity to participate in or benefit from a public entity's programs and services. It includes physical accessibility, but also entails all the policies, practices, and procedures that permit people with disabilities to participate in programs and to access important information. Programs offered by the City to the public must be accessible. Accessibility includes advertisement, orientation, eligibility, participation, testing or evaluation, physical access, provision of auxiliary aids and services, transportation, policies, and communication. Program accessibility may be achieved by either structural or non-structural methods. The City of Tigard may achieve program accessibility by several methods: • structural methods such as altering an existing facility; • acquisition or redesign of equipment; • assignment of aids to beneficiaries; and/or • provision of services at alternate sites. When choosing a method of providing program access, the City is required to prioritize the method that results in the most integrated setting appropriate to encourage interaction among all users, including individuals with disabilities. 4 ADA Title II Technical Assistance Manual 11-3.10000 3 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 1.4 ADA Self-Evaluation Process Programs, activities, and services offered by the City to the public must be accessible to people with and without disabilities. Accessibility applies to all aspects of programs or services provided by the City.The ADA Self-Evaluation for programmatic access identifies and makes recommendations to correct policies and practices that are inconsistent with title II regulations and result in limitations to access for people with disabilities. As part of the Self-Evaluation process, the City: • identifies City programs, activities, and services; • reviews the policies, practices, and procedures that govern the administration of the City's programs, activities, and services; • provides opportunity for public comment; • makes the report available to the public; and • corrects programs, activities, and services that are not consistent with the regulations. In 2018, the City evaluated its policies, programs, and procedures to determine current levels of service and the extent to which its policies and programs created barriers to accessibility for people with disabilities. Recommended actions for City programs, activities, and services can be found in Section 2 of this Plan. 1.5 ADA Transition Plan Process The ADA Transition Plan is a document that outlines a strategy for the City to progress toward compliance with the ADA Standards.The Transition Plan identifies barriers for people with disabilities and a schedule to remove those barriers over time. The City's Transition Plan must include: • a list of barriers in City facilities that limit the accessibility of programs, activities, or services to individuals with disabilities, • a detailed outline of feasible methods to remove these barriers and make the facilities accessible, • a schedule for taking the necessary steps to remove barriers to accessibility, • the opportunity for the public to provide comment on the Plan, and • the name of the individual responsible for the Plan's implementation. The City completed a physical audit of City-owned building, parking, park,trail, and public right- of-way facilities in 2018 to locate barriers to access and to identify recommendations and alterations to meet state and federal accessibility standards.The City's Transition Plan can be found in Section 3 of this Plan. 4 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 1.6 Public Outreach for the Plan A public entity is required to accept comments from the public on its ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan and is encouraged to consult with individuals with disabilities and organizations that represent them to assist in the self-evaluation process. Many individuals with disabilities have unique perspectives on a public entity's programs, activities, and services. For this planning process, the City formed a focus group representing various disability interest areas. Focus group meetings were held on April 18, 2018, November 29, 2018, and July 10, 2019 to introduce the project, receive questions and comments related to the Plan, and to provide feedback on the development of the draft ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan.The meeting summaries from these meetings are included as Appendix A: Public Outreach. In addition to the focus group,the Public Review Draft of the Plan was shared with the Committee for Community Engagement to generate ideas for sharing the document and receiving public feedback.The Plan was posted on the City's website and hard copies were made available at the Tigard Library, Senior Center, and select City offices for public comment. After completion of the public comment period, final edits will be made to the document and the Plan will be presented to the City Council for adoption and/or acceptance. 5 City of Tigard ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Pian—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 This page intentionally left blank. 6 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 2 Self-Evaluation Programs, activities, and services offered by the City of Tigard to the public must be accessible to people with and without disabilities. Accessibility applies to all aspects of a program or service, including advertisement, orientation, eligibility, participation, testing or evaluation, physical access, provision of auxiliary aids, transportation, policies, and communication. City policies and practices were reviewed to ensure that they do not adversely affect the full participation of individuals with disabilities. This process included a review of the City's current policies, services, programs, and activities based on staff responses to an online program accessibility questionnaire, and a review of the policies and practices that govern the administration of City programs, activities, and services based on information from the City's website. The recommendations contained in this section will serve as a basis for the implementation of specific strategies that will improve access to City programs, as required by law. 2.1 Programmatic Modifications The ADA Title II Coordinator, or designee, will follow-up with each department to review the recommendations contained in the self-evaluation. In those situations where a policy, program, or procedure creates a barrier to accessibility that is unique to a department or a certain program, the ADA Coordinator, or designee, will coordinate with the program manager to address the removal of the barrier in the most reasonable and accommodating manner in accordance with applicable law. 2.2 Program Accessibility: Required Actions and Implementation Strategies The findings from the program accessibility questionnaire are organized into categories based on the requirements of title II of the ADA: • Accessible and Adaptive Equipment • Public Meetings • Contracting, Licensing, or Other • Special Events and Private Events on Arrangements Public Properties • Customer Service • Telephones and Communication • Emergency Procedures Devices • Facilities • Television and Audiovisual • Notice Requirements Information • Printed Information • Tours and Trips • Program Eligibility Requirements • Training and Staffing and Admission • Transportation Services • Program Participation • Website 7 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 The online programmatic accessibility questionnaire was available from April and May 2018. A total of 33 staff members completed the questionnaire, representing all City departments. The following overview includes brief descriptions of questionnaire categories, required actions for each topic area, and recommendations for implementation. More information about the categories can be found in the "ADA Best Practices Toolkit for State and Local Governments."5 Legislative citations and links to the toolkit are provided in footnotes throughout this section. 2.2.1 Accessible and Adaptive Equipment Adaptive aids are devices, controls, appliances, or items that make it possible for persons with disabilities to improve their ability to function independently and participate in programs, services, and activities offered by the City.6 For example, a pen, note pad, and clipboard provided to a person with a hearing or speech impairment to write notes on or electronic equipment such as an accessible computer station are considered adaptive equipment. Required Actions 1. It is required to provide and maintain, in working order, accessible equipment for people with disabilities when equipment is provided to the public.' Implementation Strategies • Collaborate with community organizations that serve people with disabilities to develop and maintain a resource list of assistive technology and accessible equipment. • Review equipment provided by the City for use by the public, such as computers, copy machines, telephones, or other technologies, to identify potential barriers to accessibility and corresponding solutions. • Establish and maintain a toolkit of adaptive aids and resources for staff who interact with the public. Include information about both onsite and contracted services. • Include accessibility as a criterion for purchasing equipment such as furniture, site furnishings, and office systems. Whenever possible, evaluate furniture and building material purchases for compatibility with a wide range of disabilities and sensitivities. 5 For the full toolkit,visit https://www.ada.gov/pcatoolkit/toolkitmain.htm. "The Tool Kit should be considered a helpful supplement to—not a replacement for—the regulations and technical assistance materials that provide more extensive discussions of ADA requirements. It also does not replace the professional advice or guidance that an architect or attorney knowledgeable in ADA requirements can provide." 6 See https://www.ada.gov/pcatoolkit/chapltoolkit.htm. DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart B§ 35.133 Maintenance of accessible features 8 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 2.2.2 Contracting, Licensing, or Other Arrangements Many public agencies rely on the use of contractors, licensees, consultants, and other entities for the delivery of services.These entities are considered an extension of the City's services and are required to adhere to the same ADA regulations as the City. Required Actions 1. It is required that contractors, licensees, consultants, and other entities providing or delivering services for the City adhere to the same ADA regulations as the City.' Implementation Strategies • Ensure contractors, licensees, and other entities providing services to the public are aware of their obligation to make City programs and activities accessible. • Monitor public programs and activities provided by contractors, licensees, and other entities to ensure continued accessibility. • Provide a checklist and information to inform contractors, licensees, and other entities who provide services to the public of their responsibility for accessibility under the ADA. 2.2.3 Customer Service In-person interaction with the public is one of the primary functions of most City departments. To meet ADA standards for in-person interactions, staff should be aware of the formal and informal procedures for accommodating people with disabilities, including appropriate responses to requests for program modifications and guidelines for accommodating service animals. Required Actions 1. It is required to continue the policy of not charging an additional fee to the person requesting a program modification or alternative format due to their disability.' 2. It is required to allow service animals in City facilities.'" 3. It is required to continue to make appropriate modifications to regular practices to accommodate the needs of individuals with disabilities when providing customer service." s DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart B §35.130 General prohibitions against discrimination 9 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart B §35.130 General prohibitions against discrimination io Only dogs are recognized as service animals under title II of the ADA. In limited cases, miniature horses that are individually trained to perform tasks for people with disabilities may qualify to provide services. Emotional support,therapy, comfort, or companion animals are not considered service animals under the ADA. See DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart B§ 35.136 Service animals. 11 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart B §35.130 General prohibitions against discrimination 9 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 Implementation Strategies • Develop a process for determining reasonable modifications as they are requested.The process should address the following considerations: o Ensure the public has easy access to information about how to make a request for modifications and who to contact. o Ensure all staff can direct a person making a request to the appropriate staff member. o Ensure requests can be accepted from someone on behalf of the person with a disability and are not be required to be in writing. o Ensure staff is trained to appropriately respond to requests, including an understanding of when requests should be fulfilled immediately and when more information and planning is required to provide a modification. o Ensure staff retains documentation of requests and how they are fulfilled. • Publicize the City's ADA grievance procedure to ensure that individuals with a disability can formally communicate with the City if they are not satisfied with the results of the request process. • Track the outcomes of all accessibility requests to look for global issues that can be addressed, to evaluate the success of program modifications, and to identify problems that can be solved proactively to improve customer service. • Develop a formal process for changing standard operating procedures when needed to fulfill a modification request. • Develop guidelines to ensure the inclusion of service animals at City facilities. Appropriate exclusions are limited but might include when a service animal is out of control and the handler does not take effective action to control it, if a particular service animal is not housebroken, or if admitting service animals would fundamentally alter the nature of a service or program. • Assess the composition and needs of the population of people with disabilities in the city. This can be accomplished by developing relationships with community members with disabilities and organizations that serve people with disabilities. • Conduct outreach to people with disabilities to improve communication, increase participation, and incorporate them in the process of developing guidance on planning, programs, and possible modifications. 10 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 2.2.4 Emergency Procedures The City's emergency planning and procedures are required to include plans for people with disabilities.12 Issues that have the greatest impact on people with disabilities include: • Notification; • Evacuation; • Emergency transportation; • Access to medications, refrigeration, and back-up power; • Access to their mobility devices or service animals while in transit; and • Access to information. Required Actions 1. It is required to include strategies for people with disabilities in various types of emergency situations when developing guidelines and a plan for emergency evacuations.13 2. It is required to train staff to safely evacuate people with disabilities in various types of emergency situations when developing guidelines and a plan for emergency evacuations.14 Implementation Strategies • Incorporate the following elements into emergency planning: o Address what to do when an alarm is triggered; o Establish meeting places for assistance and evacuation chairs; o Provide direction on what to do if assistance is not available; and o Establish floor captains. • Continue to test the City's emergency evacuation procedures with periodic drills, both announced and unannounced. Enlist people with different disabilities to role-play during emergency simulations. • Review existing procedures dealing with emergencies to ensure that people with disabilities can be alerted and that they can alert emergency service providers. • Work with disability organizations to explore the use of technologies such as audible exit signs for orientation and direction or vibrating paging systems. • Provide training for public safety personnel and other key staff to enable them to communicate in basic ASL if there is an emergency condition. For example, this training 12 See https://www.ada.gov/pcatoolkit/chap7emergencymgmt.htm. 13 42 U.S.C. § 12132;see generally, DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart B§ 35.130, Subpart D§35.149. 14 42 U.S.C. § 12132;see generally, DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart B§ 35.130, Subpart D § 35.149. 11 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 would be provided to police and building inspectors involved in post-disaster emergencies. • Ensure that emergency teams are aware of people with disabilities in their communities who may require special assistance in an emergency. • Provide ASL interpreters at emergency facilities on an as-needed basis.To accomplish this, form a pool of interpreters as a resource from which to draw upon. • Review suggestions for evacuation plans and procedures on the U.S. Access Board website at http://www.ada.gov/emergencyprepguide.htm and the Emergency. • Review suggestions for evacuation plans and procedures provided by the federal government, such as the "Procedures for Employees with Disabilities in Office Occupancies" document published by FEMA and the U.S. Fire Administration. 2.2.5 Facilities City facilities should be accessible to people with different types of disabilities.The identification of structural barriers in buildings, parks, and the public rights-of-way is a required element of an ADA transition plan. Required Actions 1. It is required to ensure that interested people can obtain information regarding the existence and location of accessible facilities and elements within facilities.' Implementation Strategies • Provide information about the accessibility of City-owned and operated facilities on City publications, including City websites. Relevant information includes the locations of accessible entrances, accessible bathrooms, accessible parking, and accessible routes from transit and parking to program locations. • Provide information about the accessibility of non-City facilities hosting City programs and services. • Provide information about the accessibility of City-owned facilities that are leased to other entities. • Record and monitor requests relating to facility access.The ADA Coordinator can analyze accessibility requests periodically to look for global issues that can be addressed and problems than can be solved proactively. 15 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart E§35.163 Information and signage 12 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 2.2.6 Notice Requirements Title II regulations require the City to inform the public of the rights and protections provided by the ADA for access to public programs, services, and activities. It is the obligation of the head of the public entity to determine the most effective way of providing notice to the public about their rights and the public entity's responsibilities under the ADA. Publishing and publicizing the ADA notice is not a one-time requirement. State and local governments should provide the information on an ongoing basis, whenever necessary.16 Required Actions 1. It is required to maintain the position of ADA Coordinator.17 2. It is required to continue publishing a notice regarding the City's commitment to providing accessible services.'$ 3. It is required to continue to ensure effective communication and that interested persons can obtain information as to the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities.19 Implementation Strategies • Establish a consistent advance-notice requirement for people requesting modifications for all departments, programs, and services. • Republish and rebroadcast radio, newspaper, television, or mailings of the notice periodically, as applicable. • Increase outreach to people with disabilities and the organizations that serve them to provide information about possible modifications and the accessibility of services, programs, and activities. • Ensure staff is aware of the public locations of the nondiscrimination statement and the procedure for filing a disability discrimination complaint. 2.2.7 Printed Information To meet the ADA's communication standards, City departments must be able to provide information, when requested, in alternative formats such as using easy-to-understand language, braille, large-print format, audiotape or CD, computer media, or other formats as requested.20 16 See https://www.ada.gov/pcatoolkit/chap2toolkit.htm. 17 See https://www.ada.gov/pcatoolkit/chap2toolkit.htm; DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart A§35.107 Designation of responsible employee and adoption of grievance procedures. 18 DOJ, Title II Regulations Subpart A§35.106 Notice 19 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart E §35.163 Information and signage 20 See https://www.ada.gov/pcatoolkit/chap3toolkit.htm. 13 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 Required Actions 1. It is required to provide accessible alternative formats to printed information upon request.21 2. It is required to address all requests for other alternative formats for lengthy documents on an individual basis.22 3. It is required that any additional costs for alternative forms of communication are not assigned to the person with a disability requesting the alternative format.23 4. It is required to provide assistance upon request in filling out forms or when alternative formats are unavailable or infeasible.24 5. It is required to provide printed information in simple language for persons with cognitive disabilities upon request.25 Implementation Strategies • Provide training to staff on producing printed information in alternative formats for people with various disabilities to ensure that requests are handled in a uniform and consistent manner. When a requested format is not possible due to the nature of a specific document, City staff should seek alternative ways to communicate the information contained in the document. • Develop and implement standard templates for producing accessible City materials that are consistent with City branding and style. • Review information on developing accessible printed materials provided in the Resources section of this Plan. • Include images of people with disabilities when images of people are included in City printed materials. • Continue including the following notice on materials printed by the City that are made available to the public: This publication can be made available in alternative formats, such as large print, braille, or electronic format. Requests can be made by calling Nadine Robinson,ADA Coordinator, at(503) 718-2481, or by using the 711 Telecommunications Relay Service, or email Nadine@tgard-or.gov. Whenever possible, please allow five working days for your request to be processed. 21 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart E § 35.160 General 22 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart E §35.160 General 23 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart B§ 35.130 General prohibitions against discrimination 24 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart B§ 35.130 General prohibitions against discrimination 25 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart E §35.160 General 14 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 2.2.8 Program Eligibility Requirements and Admission The public must be able to access all programs, service, and activities, regardless of disability. Admission criteria, ability to complete forms, and participation in interviews must be available to all members of the public by providing reasonable modifications. Required Actions 1. It is required to include individuals with disabilities in regular programs without requiring the use of different or separate aids, benefits, or services, even if they are as effective as those provided to other individuals.26 2. It is required to include individuals with disabilities in regular programs to the maximum extent possible.27 3. It is required that when interviews are required for program participation, they are held in an accessible location and that alternative formats or auxiliary aids are provided upon request.28 Implementation Strategies • Include a nondiscrimination statement on application or registration forms. • Include a notice of alternative formats for application or registration forms. 2.2.9 Program Participation The public must be able to access all programs, service, and activities regardless of disability, unless a modification would result in a fundamental alteration to the nature of a service, program, or activity or impose undue financial and administrative burdens.29 Required Actions 1. It is required to include individuals with disabilities in regular programs without requiring the use of different or separate aids, benefits, or services, even if they are as effective as those provided to other individuals.3o 2. It is required to include individuals with disabilities in regular programs to the maximum extent feasible.31 26 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart B §35.130 General prohibitions against discrimination 27 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart B§ 35.130 General prohibitions against discrimination 28 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart B§35.130 General prohibitions against discrimination;Subpart E § 35.160 General 29 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart E §35.164 Duties 3°DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart B §35.130 General prohibitions against discrimination 31 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart B§ 35.130 General prohibitions against discrimination 15 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 3. It is required to provide reasonable modifications to program participants with disabilities to include them in regular programs to the maximum extent possible.32 4. It is required to modify standard policies, practices, or procedures to avoid discrimination unless the modification would fundamentally alter the nature of the program, result in an undue financial or administrative burden, or create a hazardous situation for the participant or others.33 5. It is required that when the City determines it is necessary to exclude or limit the participation of people with disabilities to ensure the safe operation of programs or services, it continues to base those determinations on real risks, not on speculation, stereotypes, or generalizations.34 Implementation Strategies • Increase outreach to persons with disabilities and the organizations that serve them to ensure program accessibility.The City should also inform the public of the possible modifications that can be provided to make programs, services, and activities accessible. 2.2.10 Public Meetings Public meetings are a regularly occurring activity for public agencies.The main objective of any public meeting is to impart and solicit information on public issues of importance to the local government. Where these meetings are held are an important consideration in meeting the requirements of the ADA. Required Actions 1. It is required to hold public meetings in accessible facilities to accommodate the participation of people with various disabilities.35 2. It is required to provide agendas and other meeting materials in alternative formats upon request.36 3. It is required to provide flexibility in the time limit on speaking for individuals with communication difficulties.37 32 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart B §35.130 General prohibitions against discrimination 33 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart B§ 35.130 General prohibitions against discrimination;see section 3 Undue Burden 34 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart B §35.130 General prohibitions against discrimination 35 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart E§ 35.160 General 36 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart E §35.160 General 37 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart E §35.160 General 16 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 4. It is required to have assistive listening devices available for public meetings where the sound at the meeting is amplified.38 Implementation Strategies • Establish a consistent advance-notice requirement for requests for modifications at public meetings. • Display a notice on meeting agendas indicating the availability of accessibility modifications and other elements of meeting participation. • Prepare a list of accessible meeting spaces to facilitate the scheduling of meetings or the relocation of meetings upon request. • Maintain a list of on-call American Sign Language interpreters who may be brought to meetings to assist individuals with hearing impairments. • Develop a checklist and provide instruction to staff on ensuring the accessibility of meetings. Guidelines should include examples of the types of modification requests that may be made by people with different types of disabilities, including assistive listening systems, sign language interpreters, readers, descriptive services, and other assistive technologies like real-time captioning. Other considerations include the layout of the room and the locations of the sign-in and refreshments tables, bathrooms, and other elements to ensure these features are accessible. • Move disability-related agenda items to the beginning of agendas when possible. Some people with disabilities are unable to stay late at meetings because they use para- transit, have fixed schedules, and/or need to use personal care attendants. • Assign a member of staff as a greeter at public meetings and events. Identify this person as a resource for people who may require assistance. 2.2.11 Special Events and Private Events on Public Properties All events on public property should be accessible to people with disabilities. When a public agency rents its properties to a third party for special events, the responsibility for maintaining an accessible environment is temporarily deferred to the tenant. Required Actions 1. It is required to maintain in operable working condition those features of a facility that are required to be readily accessible and usable by persons with disabilities39 to ensure the accessibility of events held on public property. 38 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart E §35.160 General; 2010 Standards 219.2 Required Systems 39 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart B§ 35.133 Maintenance of accessible features 17 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 Implementation Strategies • Inform private organizations that sponsor events at City facilities about applicable ADA requirements. • Provide a checklist and information during the application process to inform organizers of their responsibility for accessibility under the ADA. 2.2.12 Telephones and Communication Devices Even with technological advances such as cell phones, texting, and instant messaging, provision of alternative communication technologies such as teletypewriters (TTY), telecommunication display devices (TDDs), or telecommunication relay services (TRS) remain a requirement for communicating with the public.40 Required Actions 1. It is required that when the City communicates by telephone, it can communicate as effectively with a person with a hearing or speech impairment.41 2. It is required that staff is proficient in the use of alternative communication technologies or able to direct the public to knowledgeable staff.42 3. It is required that publications that list phone numbers include alternative contact information for people with hearing and/or speech impairments.43 Implementation Strategies • Explore options for Video Remote Interpreting Services (VRI) for communicating with people with hearing and/or speech impairments. There are many situations where a live interpreter is required, but VRI is a convenient, flexible, lower-cost alternative. 2.2.13 Television and Audiovisual Information Televised and audiovisual information is a means for disseminating public information through presentations produced by City departments. All televised and audiovisual information including PowerPoint presentations must be accessible to persons with disabilities. As more communication is being done remotely through the internet, it will be increasingly important that all communication tools maintain accessibility as technology changes.44 40 See https://www.ada.gov/pcatoolkit/chap3toolkit.htm. 41 DOJ, Title II Regulations Subpart E § 35.161 Telecommunications 42 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart E § 35.161 Telecommunications 43 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart E § 35.161 Telecommunications; § 35.163 Information and signage 44 See https://www.ada.gov/pcatoolkit/chap3toolkit.htm. 18 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 Required Actions 1. It is required to provide alternative formats of televised and audiovisual presentations produced by the City upon request.4s Implementation Strategies • Review City presentations, videos, and recordings of meetings to identify potential barriers to accessibility and corresponding solutions.46 • Encourage presenters to read the slides and describe the graphic content when presenting PowerPoint or other visual presentations. • Include images of people with disabilities when images of people are included in City audiovisual materials. 2.2.14 Tours and Trips Many public agencies provide or facilitate tours and trips as part of their service.These tours and trips are subject to title II regulations. The City is responsible for ensuring that the tour can be experienced by people with disabilities, by making accommodations or modifications. Required Actions 1. It is required to modify tours and trips upon requested to enable people with mobility, visual, speech, hearing, and cognitive disabilities to participate.47 Implementation Strategies • Incorporate opportunities to request accessibility modifications in registration materials for tours or trips. • Provide information to participants in advance of a tour or trip regarding the destination, transportation, and other characteristics of the event so that informed requests for modifications can be made. • Evaluate the destination of the tour or trip and the means of transportation to determine accessibility and any modifications that may be required. If a tour route or a portion of a route is inaccessible and modifications are requested, reroute the tour or provide program modifications that will allow the tour to be experienced (for example: photographs, videos with closed captioning). 45 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart E § 35.160 General 46 Closed captioning is not required for all televised or audiovisual presentations, but it is a common way of making them accessible to people who are unable to hear the audio portion, and in some instances, it might be the only accessible format. 47 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart B§35.130 General prohibitions against discrimination 19 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 2.2.15 Training and Staffing As a part of the City's on-going staff development and training, the incorporation of disabilities awareness, standards, and resources is encouraged for all staff interfacing with the public or who maintain the facilities used by the public. Required Actions 1. It is required that City staff is knowledgeable about providing accessible services, programs, and activities for the public and that accessible facilities are maintained in working order.48 Implementation Strategies • Provide all City staff with ongoing awareness and sensitivity training. • Develop a comprehensive disability access training program. Educate City staff about their responsibilities under the ADA.The City's ADA Coordinator or department supervisors should be responsible for ensuring that staff members receive training. Staff members who have contact with the public should receive additional training about the process of providing modifications and assistive devices to make their programs, activities, and services accessible. Ensure that training also includes information about responding to a variety of disabilities and the availability of program-specific adaptations, assistive devices, and modifications. • Develop standard guidelines for training materials.These guidelines should include standard language that appropriately describes the City's policy on inclusion and nondiscrimination. Staff members should receive training in using the guidelines effectively. • Offer training to staff members have contact with the public and wish to learn basic ASL communication skills.Training should emphasize basic communication and should not be viewed as a substitute for utilizing qualified ASL interpreters when requested. • Train maintenance staff regarding accessibility compliance and building codes to maintain facilities in an accessible condition. • Incorporate assistance for people with disabilities into training for building evacuation procedures. 48 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart E§ 35.160 General;Subpart B§ 35.130 General prohibitions against discrimination 20 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 2.2.16 Transportation Services Many public agencies provide public transportation services. The public accommodation standards for these services are set forth by the Federal Transit Administration.49 Required Actions 1. It is required to make reasonable modifications in policies, practices, or procedures for transportation programs when the modifications are necessary to avoid discrimination on the basis of disability or to provide program accessibility to services.50 Implementation Strategies • Periodically review transportation programs to proactively ensure accessibility. Develop strategies for modifications as appropriate. 2.2.17 Website As people turn to the Internet as their primary source of information regarding services, programs, activities, and facilities, the City's website at http://www.tigard-or.gov/takes on increased importance as a communications tool. Providing public access to City publications online is an effective means of reaching persons with disabilities.51 New accessibility standards for electronic and information technology covered by Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1998 have set forth the technical and functional performance criteria necessary for such technology to be accessible.52 Required Actions 1. It is required to take appropriate steps to ensure that the City's online communication with people with disabilities is as effective as other communications with the public.53 Implementation Strategies • Continue to publish the Policy of Nondiscrimination, including on the Basis of Disability, on the City's website. 49 DOT,Title 49,Subtitle A, Part 38-Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Specifications for Transportation Vehicles. See specifications for transportation vehicles at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi- bin/retrieveECFR?gp=&SID=2efb7bdb786c2e63145ea6e1cf788693&mc=true&r=PART&n=pt49.1.38. s°DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart B §35.130 General prohibitions against discrimination; DOT,Title 49, Subtitle A, §38.1 Purpose 51 See https://www.ada.gov/websites2.htm; https://www.ada.gov/pcatoolkit/chap5toolkit.htm. 52 Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act requires that federal agencies'electronic and information technology is accessible to people with disabilities. Many state and local public agencies adopt these standards as best practices.Title 29,Chapter 16, §794d Electronic and information technology. 53 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart E §35.160 General 21 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 • Conduct web accessibility analyses to periodically measure the accessibility of the City's websites. Consider adopting standards that meet or exceed Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act guidelines for the accessibility of electronic information. Outreach to people with disabilities can help identify website barriers and ensure the website includes adequate information about the City's commitment to providing accessible services. • Acquire the technological resources or staffing expertise to create accessible documents for posting on the City website. • Assign one department the authority to provide standards and oversight for outside vendors who create webpages and for departments who post their own documents. This can support consistent and accessible web pages. • Provide information on the City website about the accessibility of City facilities. 22 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 2.3 Services, Policies, and Practices Summary of Recommendations The review and evaluation of services, policies, and practices was completed in 2018.54 The comprehensive review of each service, policy, and practice offered by the City, as required by the ADA, as well as recommendations for implementing specific improvements, is included as part of this document as Appendix B: ADA Self-Evaluation Summary. The content of the full report is compiled in a Program Inventory Excel workbook that is intended to be the City's ongoing record of the remediation of barriers to providing accessible programs, services, and activities.This section provides a general overview of the recommendations and is organized into three general categories: Access Recommendations: includes recommendations that will ensure people with disabilities have access to City programs, events, and facilities. Communication Recommendations: includes recommendations that will ensure that City communication of all types is accessible to people with disabilities. Policy Recommendations: includes recommendations for changes in policy language and/or inclusiveness of policies. 2.3.1 Access Recommendations • Provide information about the accessibility of facilities where City programs, activities, and services are provided. • Provide information about requesting modifications, alternative formats of materials, auxiliary aids, and accessible services. • Ensure that fee structures for records, recordings, etc. do not discriminate against people with disabilities. • Ensure that people with disabilities have access to public records and are aware that assistance is available upon request. • Ensure that City events, programs, and services are accessible to people with disabilities.This includes events, programs, and services offered directly by the City, and offerings on behalf of the City by non-City organizations. • Provide programmatic modifications upon request. This includes assistance with forms, access to public information, relocation of services to accessible locations, and other alternatives as needed. • Ensure that City events with amplified sound, including movies and concerts at parks, are accessible for people with disabilities. sa This included a review of the City's standards and specifications,available under separate cover from the City's ADA Coordinator. 23 City of Tigard 1 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 2.3.2 Communications Recommendations • Ensure that online services,forms, questionnaires, and documents are accessible for people with disabilities or that alternatives are provided upon request. • Ensure that materials are available in alternative formats upon request. Provide personal assistance where alternatives are not available. • Conduct accessibility checks for the City website and all documents, presentations, and videos posted to the City website and ensure the City's website is accessible in multiple browsers. • Ensure that documents are formatted in a way that is accessible for screen readers. • Provide fillable PDF forms wherever possible. • Ensure that information contained in complex documents, maps, tables, charts, and calendars is available in alternative formats upon request. • Ensure that videos, including live and archived recordings of meetings, are accessible for people with disabilities. In some cases, transcripts or captions might be necessary. • Provide email and TTY contact information where other contact information is provided. Ensure that multiple forms of contact information are provided for requesting a modification. 2.3.3 Policy Recommendations • Ensure information about programs and registration are available in alternative formats upon request. • Ensure that policy of not accepting payment or reservations by phone for certain programs and services does not discriminate against people with disabilities. • Ensure that parking and traffic control plans retain and provide accessible parking spaces and circulation. • Ensure that staff training incorporates information about interacting with and assisting people with disabilities. • Use person-first language when referring to people with disabilities. • Ensure that policies regarding animals, including livestock, do not inhibit ownership of service animals. 24 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 3 Transition Plan Title II of the ADA requires that public entities having responsibility for or authority over facilities, streets, roads, sidewalks, and/or other areas meant for public use to develop a Transition Plan to ensure their facilities meet the standards for program accessibility. Program accessibility means that a program, activity, or service provided to the public is accessible when viewed in its entirety. Simply put, a Transition Plan assists in turning inaccessible facilities into environments that are accessible to and useable by individuals with disabilities. The process of developing an ADA Transition Plan includes the identification of access barriers within the built environment.The Transition Plan for the removal of structural barriers to program access must contain the following information: • Identification of the barriers to program access; • Identification of the specific barrier removal action(s); • Identification of a schedule for barrier removal; and • Identification of responsibility for ensuring barrier removal. This Transition Plan is organized into two parts: 1) buildings, parks, trails, and parking lots (Section 3.3), and 2) the public right-of-way (Section 3.4), which includes curb ramps, sidewalks and associated hazards, and pedestrian signals under the City's maintenance responsibility. 3.1 Schedule for Facility Improvements Title II regulations state that if a transition plan will take more than one year to fully implement, it must contain interim steps to provide program accessibility.This plan proposes a preliminary 15-year strategy for removing barriers at City buildings, parks, trails, and parking lots, and within the public right-of-way.The City reserves the right to modify barrier removal priorities to allow flexibility in accommodating community requests, petitions for reasonable modifications from people with disabilities, changes in City programs, and funding opportunities and constraints. The City plans to focus on refining its programs, priorities, and schedule over the next three years and will make updates to the priority tables contained in this report on an annual basis. The barrier removal strategy incorporates flexibility in the process and allows the City to respond to new opportunities as they arise.The City's ADA Coordinator will be responsible for ensuring barrier removal. For the most current status of the remediation of barriers, contact the ADA Coordinator. 3.2 Accessibility Standards At the time of the evaluations, the ADA 2010 Standards, 2014 Oregon Structural Specialty Code (OSSC) Chapter 11 Accessibility, 2015 Architectural Barriers Act(ABA) Standards for Outdoor Developed Areas, 2011 Proposed Accessibility Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way(PROWAG), 2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (MUTCD), and the 1991 ADA Standards for Accessible Design (ADAAG) were used to 25 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 identify barriers at City facilities. The barrier evaluations conducted provide an assessment of current conditions as viewed by current code and provide a baseline for future barrier removal. 3.3 Facility Evaluations The barrier assessments for buildings, parks, trails, and public parking facilities included all public interior and exterior elements of a site.The assessment identified physical barriers in each facility that limit accessibility and compared each facility to the 2010 ADA, 2014 OSSC, and the 2015 ABA. Summaries of the identified barriers are included with this document as Appendix C: ADA Barrier Analysis Summary Report.The evaluations were undertaken by a consultant team equipped with measuring devices, City facility data, and evaluation checklists. Diagrams and GIS maps of each site were annotated during the evaluation process and were included in the ADA Facility Assessment Report, available from the City.55 The elements included in the evaluations are as follows: • Built-in Elements • Outdoor Constructed • Play Equipment Areas • Doors/Gates Features • Program Specific** • Drinking Fountains • Parking Areas • Restrooms • Elevators • Paths of Travel* • Rooms • Hazards • Signs • Picnic Areas • Telephones • Other Features * Paths of travel encompass corridors/aisles, curb ramps, ramps, stairways, trails, and walks. **Program specific barriers include features that are typically unique to certain facilities, such as bathing facilities,eating areas,judicial facilities, kitchens, and libraries. 3.3.1 Barrier Categorization The removal of accessibility barriers is guided by a categorization process referenced in the ADA regulations. The principle is to ensure that basic access is provided, access to activities is provided, amenities are accessible, and alternatives to architectural modifications are allowed when appropriate.The categorization process includes the following programmatic categories: • Category 1 identifies barriers that affect accessibility at the entrance to a facility, or a pedestrian route to the portion of a facility where program activities take place (for example: parking, walks, ramps, stairs, doors). ss The ADA Facility Assessment Reports are available under separate cover by contacting the City's ADA Coordinator.The ADA Facility Assessment Reports are a snapshot in time of the facility at the time of evaluation.The reports do not reflect the dates or history of construction or alterations of City facilities. In some cases,the items contained in the reports are not required to be remediated because those items were compliant at the time of construction or alteration, or other options are available to the City to provide similar accessible programs,activities, and services.The reports do not necessarily reflect actions that the City must undertake, but rather constitute a list of elements that were not consistent with accessibility standards current at the time of the evaluation. 26 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 • Category 2 identifies barriers that affect accessibility of program use areas (for example: trails, transaction counters, conference rooms, public offices, restrooms). • Category 3 identifies barriers that affect access to amenities serving program areas (for example: drinking fountains, telephones, site furnishings, vending machines). • Category 4 identifies areas or features that may not be required to be modified for accessibility (for example: a pathway that does not connect to an accessible feature, an area where no public programs or activities occur, or the program or activity provided at this location is available in an accessible location). This categorization was applied to each identified barrier at City buildings, parks, trails, and public parking lots. Some barriers will require further evaluation by City staff for programmatic solutions.These barriers were assigned two category values (for example: 2 or 4), indicating the barrier will need to be assigned one of the values but not both. 3.3.2 Priorities for Barrier Removal at City Facilities To develop a phasing schedule for the removal of barriers at the City's facilities, prioritization criteria were developed with input from the ADA focus group and prioritization meetings conducted with City staff.All facilities in which the City provides programs, activities,and services were reviewed based on the following criteria: • Level of Use by the Public: Facilities that receive a high level of public use receive a higher priority. • Program Uniqueness:Some programs are unique to a building, facility, or population and cannot occur at another location. • Identified Accessibility Needs: Efforts should focus on City facilities where there have been accessibility complaints. • Geographic Distribution: By selecting a range of facilities that are distributed throughout the City, the City can ensure maximum access for all residents. • Public Gathering and Meeting Spaces: Facilities that are used by the community and City for public meetings, special events, and gatherings. • Community Rights and Responsibilities: Facilities where services are provided to exercise citizen rights—participation in City Council and Commission meetings, access to elected officials, facilities where taxes are paid, permits and licenses are obtained, etc. 3.3.3 Phasing Schedule for City Facility Improvements This Plan proposes a 15-year strategy for removing barriers at City facilities that limit program accessibility. Barriers identified at City facilities will be removed systematically based on 27 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 established program priorities. It is the intent of the City to address and remove barriers to accessibility at its facilities based on the need for programmatic access. The City reserves the right to modify barrier removal priorities to allow flexibility in accommodating community requests, petitions for reasonable modifications from people with disabilities, changes in City programs, and funding opportunities and constraints. It is the goal of this Plan to provide access to the programs, activities, and services provided by the City. ADA regulations state that if a transition plan will take more than one year to fully implement, it must contain interim steps to provide program accessibility. Interim measures will be explored and implemented to provide better access for the public pending the implementation of major physical barrier removal projects. Interim measures in this Plan may include: • relocating a program to an accessible facility, • the installation of directional signs, • the installation of a power door or lift, • adjustments to operating mechanisms, • temporary modifications that increase access, or • other actions that enable better access. The City will accomplish barrier removals in its buildings and sites either through policy and procedure modifications to remove programmatic barriers, or maintenance and construction projects to remove structural barriers. The information contained in the ADA facility assessment reports has been incorporated into barrier analysis Excel workbook with companion facility GIS data, which is intended to be the living Transition Plan and the City's ongoing record of the remediation of barriers.The tracking tool will be updated over time as the City removes barriers or finds programmatic solutions to barriers.The record is maintained by the City's ADA Coordinator. For the current status of the remediation of barriers, contact the City's ADA Coordinator. The barrier removal schedule is summarized in tables on the following pages. It is the City's intent to review all barriers during the first three years of Plan implementation and address those barriers that can be resolved through programmatic modifications and maintenance tasks.The City will then revise the schedule for removal of the remaining barriers. It is also assumed that as facility barriers are evaluated in greater detail as part of future projects and complaints, a percentage of the barriers will fall within the safe harbor provisions, explained later in this section.The City will then revise and update the inventory of barriers and, when applicable, revise the schedule for the removal of remaining barriers. The following tables are organized by type of facility and represent an initial 15-year plan for barrier removal.The initial schedules were developed based on staff discussions and priorities including each facility's level of use by the public, and types and critical nature of services provided. 28 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 Table 3-1:Transition Plan Phasing Schedule for City Buildings56 Facility Years 1-3 Years 1-5 Years 1-10 Years 1-15+ Civic Center: City Hall • • • Civic Center: Permit Center • • • Civic Center: Police • • • Civic Center: Exterior • • • Dirksen Nature Park Educational • • Building Fanno Creek House • • Library • • • Public Works Building • • • Senior Center • • • Table 3-2:Transition Plan Phasing Schedule for City Parks57 Facility Years 1-3 Years 1-5 Years 1-10 Years 1-15+ Ash Avenue Dog Park • • Bonita Park • • Bull Mountain Park • • Commercial Park • • Community Garden • • Cook Park • • Dirksen Nature Park • • East Butte Heritage Park • • Elizabeth Price Park • • Englewood Park • • Fanno Creek Park • • Jack Park • • Jim Griffith Memorial Skate Park • • Liberty Park • • Main Street Park • • Northview Park • • Potso Dog Park • • ss The most current information on the status of all barrier identification and mitigation is contained in the City's ADA Barrier Analysis Tool maintained by the City's ADA Title II Coordinator. 'Windmill Park is a corner location with no facilities to evaluate under the scope of the ADA is not included in the transition plan phasing schedule. 29 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 Table 3-2:Transition Plan Phasing Schedule for City Parks' Facility Years 1-3 Years 1-5 Years 1-10 Years 1-15+ Senn Park • • Summerlake Park • • Woodard Park • • Table 3-3:Transition Plan Phasing Schedule for City Trails Facility Years 1-5 Years 6-10 Years 11-15 Years 1-15+ Englewood East/N Dakota to • • Tigard Trail Fanno Creek Trail (Library) • • Fanno Creek Trail • • Pathfinder-Genesis Trail • • Table 3-4:Transition Plan Phasing Schedule for City Parking Lots Facility Years 1-5 Years 6-10 Years 11-15 Years 1-15+ SW Main at SW Burnham • • • SW Main at SW Tigard • • • 30 i i ii . i ,I I -._ ,1 `1 I IIIII I T I GARD D irksen Nature Park Educational Building Tigard ADA Self-Evaluation &Transition Plan • Evaluated Buildings and Parking Lots i swwain t StPublic Lot(SW Main at SW Tigard)__- i -0 i Public Lot(SW Main at SW Burnham) • ® j ff ?I Ferguson Building i Public Works Building • Civic Center-Police Station 1 Civic Center-Permit Center Civic Center-City Hall— • •Fanno Creek House Senior Center, Context .Library Street f Railroad Water Feature _._ �._.... I �..._,. Park I i City Limits i i lune 2019 ---I r I i0 ^ —Miles • I 0.25 0.5 This page intentionally left blank. A rw .1111 Senn Park I i Englewood ..L:�___ Park Englewood East/ �N.Dakota to Tigard Trail r '1'I GAR D fr I Q i R n_ I Summerlake I Park ® I Dirksen Tigard ADA Self-Evaluation &Transition Plan Nature g Park Commercial Park Evaluated Parks and Trails Windmill Park Northview - Liberty Park I Park 1 --- Jack Woodard Park i 9 I i Park i Ash Ave.Dog Park ' " +., 1 I Jim Griffith Memorial Skate Park I L.r- -- '- I. i Main St Park --i Potso Dog Park I i f r i Community Garden J_'� Fanno Trail i i L_ Fanno Creek Trail Pathfinder-Genesis Trail Creek Park i _.1 Park I i Bull Mountain Park yp Unmarked Trail r i >. I, j I " aw l g i i I Il•C,1IL Elizabeth Price Park East Butte Bonita Park I I Fa-'' Heritage i i i j I1 Park ! --- - r r--' I I I 10 - - - - , r i ,r-"" f r---; • , 1 Context i 1 -L. i i i I , -•-•-- , I i i Street I -.1 r' i `, I 1 Railroad i i,:•` i', i41101 `i ) Water Feature . . Park l Cook P nark .,..,,,e' A.7 /j i City Limits / r, I'fJune 2019 g f }� ©`, / — � (130 Miles 0 0.25 0.5 This page intentionally left blank. City of Tigard i ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 3.4 Public Right-of-Way The ADA addresses accessible public right-of-way where sidewalks are provided by the City.The ADA does not mandate the installation of sidewalks but does require curb ramps at intersections where existing pedestrian walkways are provided.58 Under title II of the ADA, the City is not necessarily required to construct curb ramps at every point where a sidewalk intersects a curb. Traffic safety considerations may make construction of ramps unsafe at some locations. Alternative routes to buildings that make use of existing curb ramps may be acceptable under the concept of program accessibility where individuals with disabilities need only travel a marginally longer route. In addition, the undue financial or administrative burden limitation recognized by title II of the ADA may limit the number of curb ramps that the City is required to provide (see Section 3.5.4 and 3.5.5). In 2002, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which has jurisdiction over Oregon, held for the first time that sidewalks constitute a service, program, or activity of a public entity.59 Sidewalks are, therefore, subject to the ADA's program accessibility regulations. Before this decision, the law was unclear about whether transition plans for public entities should address barrier removal from sidewalks. When originally written, the ADA specifically addressed curb ramps;this court decision added sidewalks. 3.4.1 Public Right-of-Way Evaluations Right-of-way facilities under Tigard's responsibility were evaluated in 2018 using criteria from the 1991 ADAAG, 2010 ADA, 2011 PROWAG, and 2009 MUTCD accessibility standards.The evaluations included curb ramps, pedestrian access routes, and pedestrian signals. The pedestrian access route data includes crosswalks, railroad crossings, sidewalks, and hazards found along walkways and is referenced more generally as sidewalks in the remainder of this document.This section describes each type of facility evaluated and summarizes the barrier findings as follows: • A matrix showing geospatial proximity priorities by category; • Descriptions of the barrier categorizations; and • Maps showing the locations of identified barriers. 58 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart D§35.151(i) 59 Barden v. City of Sacramento, 292 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir. 2002) 35 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 3.4.2 Public Right-of-Way Prioritization The draft schedule for removing barriers in the City's public right-of-way was developed using guidelines identified in title II of the ADA. If a public entity has responsibility or authority over streets, roads, or walkways, its transition plan shall include a schedule for providing curb ramps or other sloped areas where pedestrian walks cross curbs, giving priority to walkways serving entities covered by the Act, including State and local government offices and facilities, transportation, places of public accommodation, and employers,followed by walkways serving other areas.60 Based on these guidelines, the prioritization criteria include the following: • Locations of citizen complaint/request (ADA Title II Program Access); • Locations serving government offices and public facilities; • Locations serving transportation; • Locations serving high use pedestrian corridors; • Locations serving commercial districts and employers; and • Locations serving other areas. Matrices on the following pages, starting with Table 3-5, illustrate the prioritization criteria for curb ramp, sidewalks, and pedestrian signal barrier removal projects in the City's public right- of-way. Each facility evaluated was assigned a rank based on its barrier priority and category. The priority is based on the information described above and the barrier category is based on the condition of the facility. The descriptions for each category are provided after each matrix. The highest ranked facilities are shaded in purple, medium ranked in blue, and lower ranked in gold. The facilities with no assigned rank have no access deficiencies identified and are shaded in green. The columns in the matrix indicate the assigned priority and are in order of importance from left to right, with the left column having the highest importance. The rows indicate the category of condition assigned to each facility during the evaluation process, with the top row having the highest importance. Note that categories are hierarchical: higher-level categories (that is, one and two) may include lower-level category conditions (that is, three and four), but lower-level categories cannot include higher-level category conditions. 6° DOJ, Title II Regulations Subpart D §35.150(d)(2)Transition plan 36 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 3.4.3 Phasing Schedule for Public Right-of-Way Improvements The City proposes a 15-year strategy for the removal of barriers in the public right-of-way. Opportunities for funding the removal of access barriers in the public right-of-way include: • Projects for new construction; • Projects for roadway alterations; • Maintenance and repair projects and programs; • Dedication of a fund for ADA barrier removal; • Requirement for private developers to remove access barriers when development affects facilities within the right-of-way; and • Actively seeking out and applying for grant funding specific to removal of access barriers when available. The City currently has a pavement management program that schedules roadway rehabilitation and maintenance on an annual basis.The City plans to review public right-of-way barriers during the implementation of this Plan and address those barriers that can be resolved as part of the ongoing pavement maintenance and rehabilitation program. As part of the review, the City will revise the Transition Plan schedule for the removal of barriers.The Transition Plan schedule will also be updated as projects for new construction and roadway alterations arise. 3.4.4 Roadway Alterations and Maintenance:Triggers for Barrier Removals The DOJ, in coordination with the U.S. Department of Transportation, specifies that public entities are required to provide curb ramps or upgrade curb ramps whenever roadways are altered. An alteration is a change that affects or could affect the usability of all or part of a building or facility.61 Alterations of streets, roads, or highways include activities such as reconstruction, rehabilitation, resurfacing, widening, and projects of similar scale and effect.62 Maintenance activities on streets, roads, or highways, such as filling potholes, are not alterations and do not trigger barrier removal.fi3 The following lists distinguishes between roadway alterations and maintenance activities. 61 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart D §35.151(b)(1)Alterations 62 2010 ADA Standards, 106.5 63 July 8, 2013 DOJ/Department of Transportation Joint Technical Assistance on the Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act Requirements to Provide Curb Ramps when Streets, Roads,or Highways are Altered through Resurfacing. 37 City of Tigard 1 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 Alteration • Addition of new layer of asphalt • New construction • Cape seals • Open-graded surface course • In-place asphalt recycling • Rehabilitation and reconstruction • Microsurfacing and thin-lift overlay • Resurfacing of a crosswalk • Mill and fill / mill and overlay Maintenance • Chip seals • Pavement patching • Crack filling and sealing • Painting or striping • Diamond grinding • Scrub sealing • Dowel bar retrofit • Slurry seals • Fog seals • Spot high-friction treatments • Joint crack seals • Surface sealing • Joint repairs The City intends to replace or upgrade all non-compliant curb ramps under its maintenance responsibility during roadway alteration projects. 38 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 Table 3-5: Curb Ramp Geospatial Proximity Priority Matrix A B C D E F Location of Location Serving Location Serving Location Serving Priorities Priority Citizen Complaint Government Location Serving High-Use Commercial Location Serving or Request(ADA (Category) Description Title II Program Offices&Public Transportation Pedestrian Districts, Other Areas Facilities Corridor Employers Access) See 1 Category 1 Al B1 Cl D1 El Fl Description High Priority-- - See 2 Category 2 A2 B2 C2 D2 E2 F2 Description See 3 Category 3 A3 B3 C3 D3 E3 F3 Description Medium Priority - - I See 4 Category 4 A4 B4 C4 D4 E4 F4 Description Low Priority - I No 5 deficiencies AS B5 C5 D5 E5 F5 identified *The priorities listed under columns B, C, E, and F are specified under title II 28 CFR Section 35.150 (d). 39 City of Tigard ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 3.4.5 Curb Ramp Barrier Descriptions Category 1: Category 3: • The curb ramp is built-up in the travel lane. • Parallel curb ramp with constrained turning space on two or more • The curb ramp is significantly damaged or deteriorated and is unsafe. sides is less than four-by-five feet. • There is a sidewalk with no curb ramp access or there is an • Turning space is less than four-by-four feet. • A four-by-four-foot clear space at the bottom of the ramp outside obstruction to accessing the curb ramp. of the travel lane is not provided. • The curb ramp has no detectable warning. • Running slope of ramp exceeds 8.33 percent or five percent for a • The curb ramp has no receiving ramp. blended transition. Category 2: • Cross slope of ramp exceeds two percent. • The facility is located along an arterial roadway and is a high use • Counter slope of the curb ramp is greater than five percent. • Grade break is not perpendicular to ramp. pedestrian corridor: • The curb ramp has a lip or vertical discontinuity greater than a half- • Curb ramp has turning space that does not meet any existing inch. standards. • The facility is located along a collector roadway and: o The curb ramp does not have a firm,stable, and slip resistance o Curb ramp has turning space that does not meet any existing surface and/or has openings greater than a half-inch or parallel standards. with the direction of travel. o The curb ramp does not have a firm,stable,and slip resistance o Width of ramp is less than 36 inches. surface and/or has openings greater than a half-inch or parallel o The curb ramp is not located within marked crossings(when with the direction of travel. present). o Width of ramp is less than 36 inches. o A three-by-four-foot clear space at the bottom of the ramp o The curb ramp is not located within marked crossings(when outside of the travel lane is not provided. present). o End of walk midblock o A three-by-four-foot clear space at the bottom of the ramp outside of the travel lane is not provided. o End of walk ramp with non-conforming curb ramp design o End of walk midblock o Sidewalk transition to roadway midblock with non-conforming o End of walk ramp with non-conforming curb ramp design features. o Sidewalk transition to roadway midblock with non-conforming features 40 City of Tigard 1 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 Category 4: Category 5: • Slope of ramp flared sides(if applicable)exceeds 10 percent. • No deficiencies identified. • Diagonal curb ramp design without existing physical constraints. • The curb ramp has a lip or vertical discontinuity less than a half-inch. • The detectable warning surface does not meet ADAAG or PROWAG standards. • End of walk due to road terminating • Trailhead with non-conforming features • Curb ramp with no adjacent pedestrian walkway • The facility is located along a neighborhood or local roadway and: o Curb ramp has turning space that does not meet any existing standards. o The curb ramp does not have a firm,stable,and slip resistance surface and/or has openings greater than a half-inch or parallel with the direction of travel. o Width of ramp is less than 36 inches. o The curb ramp is not located within marked crossings(when present). o A three-by-four-foot clear space at the bottom of the ramp outside of the travel lane is not provided. o End of walk midblock o End of walk ramp with non-conforming curb ramp design o Sidewalk transition to roadway midblock with non-conforming features. 41 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 Table 3-6:Curb Ramp Barrier Summary Category Priority Instances Percent of Total Schedule Year High Priority 1 B1 32 1.1% 1-15 1 Cl 277 9.4% 1-15 1 D1 239 8.1% 1-15 1 El 4 0.1% 1-15 2 B2 6 0.2% 1-15 2 C2 63 2.1% 1-15 Subtotal 621 21.1% - Medium Priority 1 Fl 248 8.4% 1-15 2 D2 28 1.0% 1-15 2 E2 3 0.1% 1-15 2 F2 6 0.2% 1-15 3 B3 44 1.5% 1-15 3 C3 469 15.9% 1-15 3 D3 487 16.5% 1-15 3 E3 9 0.3% 1-15 Subtotal 1,294 44.0% - 42 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 Category Priority Instances Percent of Total Schedule Year Low Priority 3 F3 455 15.5% 1-15 4 B4 35 1.2% 1-15 4 C4 156 5.3% 1-15 4 D4 89 3.0% 1-15 4 E4 13 0.4% 1-15 4 F4 249 8.5% 1-15 Subtotal 997 33.9% - No Deficiencies T 5 B5 2 0.1% - 5 C5 9 0.3% - 5 D5 4 0.1% - 5 F5 16 0.5% - Subtotal 31 1.1% - Total for All Projects 2,943 100.0% - 43 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 This page intentionally left blank. 44 rr P f r., - , i I . ., . ! , . . i 11111 i i ii,„ . ,...„ _..._, i - •• • t i • r - ... •• s .• •. : • TIGARD •• ; J i • • •Po.•1•; .• • •w• % •• •.► - m • •• • • • •E•••..• Tigard ADA Self-Evaluation &Transition Plan • Curb Ramp Barrier Removal .r • ; . . • •••••••• • : •• •• ,•i Projects: High and Medium Priority �j • �• •� p=1•• ••• • • • wialnut1• `, • • • ••• f __• • } .../ 1 ♦ I • •.• • i • _ / �• Barrier Removal Rank i i_. p ! • .• • • • • •. •• • •, High Priority I i ,.J ,--,—..7. • • • • •. • • • • • • ti I i L._.'2,•• • • • .. ; • • • • • ••• r Medium Priority j C—� • • • • • • . ..... • `. • ••.s 1 • ti I. •• • •• • �• • i r =-I lLs---��---•--•--�e I • .• '.SY Gaai l :a .•• • ••aav a,Sj. e r� _r-.i I •••:•i.:_M . • • • • •• • • • •., ,ii •••• •• • Bo and IIP c I .1- I r- / • • • .•. • • • Context J i • •• •• •• (7 M•.i _ L J .• • . • Street — — —t i ri .•s�. 1•• • • _ ••Of •• •• • Railroad '761 . • 7 t i� • ._• :. • • =• j tit • a • . Water Feature i - • • • • . a •.} • • Park Los .••. • •• • ••♦ • /' J i City Limits iu • I • I June 2019 e NM Miles 0 0.25 0.5 This page intentionally left blank. r. II 1 I r, I i -- TIGARD n f= --- - t. Tigard ADA Self-Evaluation &Transition Plan 9 Curb Ramp Barrier Removal • Projects: Low Priority and .7 SW Walnut St __- No Deficiencies Identified 1 _ • + •. j Barrier Removal Rank • r i t• L •• I L_J L _:- / n. .« • ow Priority ,......„,. . . : . . .... . . . .., . a ,,"I ..* • .. . • . •,.. • .• / ...• t No Deficiencies Identified ,• • / SW Gaarde St ••• i I ELS-—fl.__.---_--- SW McDonald St `�' `. g I , I - :m''. SW Banda Rd F ter. L.I ! I l I l I 9BW f — — ..i Jam.. r ; ;—'f/, — _ Context •• , I 14.1--' I a t Street l. I---- -------t r �, .....,..- SW Durham Rd • - '° ♦ . .� I l ! Railroad 4 • • fig 1 li -___..,_.1...._. ,7 Water Feature +r.- • tili .' i Park r 1., .. �,,- `rz-J City Limits r m III June 2019 3`r F' e Miles , " 0 0.25 0.5 This page intentionally left blank. City of Tigard 1 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 Table 3-7: Sidewalk Geospatial Proximity Priority Matrix A B C D E F Location of Citizen Location Serving Location Serving Location Serving Location Serving Priorities Priority Complaint or Government Transportation/High- High-Use Commercial Location Serving Request(ADA (Category) Description Offices&Public Use Pedestrian Pedestrian Districts, Other Areas Title II Program Facilities Corridor Corridor Employers Access) See 1 Category 1 Al 81 Cl D1 El Fl Description High Priority--- - I See 2 Category 2 A2 B2 C2 D2 E2 F2 Description See 3 Category 3 A3 B3 C3 D3 E3 F3 Description Medium Priority . --I See 4 Category 4 A4 B4 C4 D4 E4 F4 Description Low Priority No 5 deficiencies A5 B5 C5 D5 E5 F5 identified *The priorities listed under columns B, C, E, and F are specified under title II 28 CFR Section 35.150 (d). 49 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 3.4.6 Sidewalk Barrier Descriptions Category 1: Category 3: • Sidewalk condition is poor with cracking,spalding, heaving, or other • Cross slope of crosswalk is between 2.1 percent and three percent. condition. • Sidewalk condition is average with minor defects and wear. • The sidewalk width is less than 48 inches due to fixed and/or movable • The sidewalk has vertical changes of level that exceed a half-inch but are obstacles. less than one inch. • Running slope of crosswalk is greater than five percent. • Detectable warning surface placement at rail crossing is greater than six feet and less than 15 feet. • Cross slope of crosswalk is greater than four percent. • The sidewalk cross slope exceeds 2.4 percent but is less than four • A detectable warning surface is not provided at railroad crossing. percent. • Railroad flangeway gap is greater than three inches. • The sidewalk has overhanging or protruding objects along its route. Category 2: • The sidewalk has horizontal openings greater than a half-inch wide and/or openings parallel to the path of travel. • The facility is located along an arterial roadway and: • The facility is located along a collector roadway and: o The sidewalk cross slope exceeds four percent. o The sidewalk cross slope exceeds four percent. o Cross slope of crosswalk is between 3.1 percent and four percent. o Cross slope of crosswalk is between 3.1 percent and four o Detectable warning surface placement at rail crossing is greater percent than 15 feet. o Detectable warning surface placement at rail crossing is greater o The sidewalk width is less than five feet without a passing space. than 15 feet. o Running slope of sidewalk exceeds grade of road and is greater o The sidewalk width is less than five feet without a passing space. than five percent. o Running slope of sidewalk exceeds grade of road and is greater o The sidewalk cross slope at driveway entries exceeds two percent. than five percent. o The sidewalk has vertical changes of level that exceed a one inch. o The sidewalk cross slope at driveway entries exceeds two percent. o The sidewalk has vertical changes of level that exceed a one- inch. 50 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 Category 4: Category 5: • The sidewalk has vertical changes of level that exceed a quarter-inch • No deficiencies identified. or up to a half-inch with a bevel. • The sidewalk surface is not firm and slip resistant. • The sidewalk cross slope exceeds two percent but is less than 2.4 percent. • The facility is located along a neighborhood or local roadway and: o The sidewalk cross slope exceeds four percent. o Cross slope of crosswalk is between 3.1 percent and four percent o Detectable warning surface placement at rail crossing is greater than 15 feet. o The sidewalk width is less than five feet without a passing space. o Running slope of sidewalk exceeds grade of road and is greater than five percent. o The sidewalk cross slope at driveway entries exceeds two percent. o The sidewalk has vertical changes of level that exceed a one inch. 51 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 Table 3-8:Sidewalk Barrier Summary Category Priority Instances Percent of Total Schedule Year High Priority 1 B1 35 0.1% 1-15 1 Cl 763 2.7% 1-15 1 D1 575 2.0% 1-15 1 El 8 0.0% 1-15 2 B2 10 0.0% 1-15 2 C2 207 0.7% 1-15 Subtotal 1,598 5.6% - Medium Priority 1 Fl 1,073 3.8% 1-15 2 D2 93 0.3% 1-15 2 E2 1 0.0% 1-15 2 F2 10 0.0% 1-15 3 B3 309 1.1% 1-15 3 C3 4,198 14.7% 1-15 3 D3 3,622 12.7% 1-15 3 E3 66 0.2% 1-15 Subtotal 9,372 32.8% - 52 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 Category Priority Instances Percent of Total Schedule Year Low Priority 3 F3 5,318 18.6% 1-15 4 B4 223 0.8% 1-15 4 C4 2,966 10.4% 1-15 4 D4 2,729 9.6% 1-15 4 E4 48 0.2% 1-15 4 F4 5,511 19.3% 1-15 Subtotal 16,789 58.8% - No Deficiencies 5 B5 37 0.1% - 5 C5 330 1.2% - 5 D5 183 0.6% - 5 E5 11 0.0% - 5 F5 221 0.8% - Subtotal 782 2.7% - Total for All Projects 28,541 100.0% - 53 City of Tigard l ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 This page intentionally left blank. 54 1 Pyr 1)/C1\ 2 i_; i j i . • — —..— • ' i r-- 1 1 LTARD , • •• • i I • • �.t . ., • • ~• �•• •• % .....d. m • • i • .= 1 •• Tigard ADA Self Evaluation &Transition Plan • too II ee• • Se ent• EDI• it Sidewalk Barrier Removal Projects: • •� • "I° %I( , • ••• ♦ High Priority • • • t • 1 • • ` • • II. it Walnut S4 •• \ • j• i i 1 • u•• r • • •. • ••• •• i Barrier Removal Rank • # i Il r -. r] i • • • • • • • •; • High Priority I i L.J L4;.__ • • • I ,___, • .•,.., • •w l • • '1 • • • • r $ : •i.• p I • • - ry • --`a.3.••s• �. , • iv McDonald St �• •• t I 1 i� _df"-. • • • I. —$ .y ilg.%n to Rd••,M.•.• • t ._.__.____- y- 1 1 j -_�• •01,,,;,--,ii 4 i t -' , S i • ;--,t • I i Context 1_._._.. i J i I % •• .N •• • i Street i' r !` • • •i t — — —t i r�••' i • ti • •�•. �_• • Railroad M• • • • i _AeJ ---"--'-- iNti•� 5 d Durham Rd •• • •# Water Feature ! • •• A • _• • Park I •. I sf ,,..--71 — — , L_, • • ••••r„ -„•d `.3i City Limits I !� I,. i© IO lune 2019 e MN Miles 0 0.25 0.5 This page intentionally left blank. 11 . • i_.-ice • t,: .- -- • .r.•. -,�. . • r T I G A R D ' -�— .�� tt .`i�. • .. tt . . r•na •• iII. tt •0,•''` • -• 1..., . Tigard ADA Self-Evaluation&Transition Plan ♦ f r -.A, • "'•+•�" % ® • r Sidewalk Barrier Removal Projects: • • ' ••• • i l ‘,4 mo+t. Medium Priority ' A • Walnut. • •j7 I • • • 1,, _ fiellitilr •j J• a. 'r' • • ; -.�� ••« .. Barrier Removal Rank • • !r 1i; • j � • ► ♦ • J Medium Priorit sob is i ; L_ h_--c� • t • • • f .• • / f% es„ y • _ _ . . I • �r• at tir 1 j�• I, iI 1_- • • • •• •• ��yynn�,�,,1111uu t i ,--i • 1 • • • i • i -_ ( I�,- I__—`• ! •• •II. • • •. _ •� IA Context €.- - , ♦ • i 60w •.•. 2 2 Street - - —t I i%', / �r *4•1# • 1 • .• I Railroad •♦ • :; • ' i ' . . �- ! Water Feature • t 1 c::. .i Ztr - • Park sr i._, t• • • ••••. f .' `:7 i City Limits i;, • ; r� i i© 0 June 2019 e0. _. Miles 0 0.25 0.5 This page intentionally left blank. L•.., is l''• i ,, I / • �- 1 . • • T I GARD z R • • ' : 14 ff4 Tigard ADA Self-Evaluation&Transition Plan • •• •• • •• •• • •; • '• •• • ,_ : %.A ,, "'�' Sidewalk Barrier Removal Projects: • • ,. • Low Priority and No Deficiencies • • •• •• • • • • r,,... • �T• .11 • • • •• • • iWalnut St • • • •} .• : •--: I r' 1 • • ,sier "cr . r • M • • • • i Barrier Removal Rank •• L__Jr L4� • V J �,. , • •�• • No Deficiencies Identified �— i • � . + • /6 • •IR ••a Low Priority 8 fill" I •-. - • SWGaarde Sl • SW Mc�an�Id St ,��:~ i I l..:;.• i i • • ••• • 111 • • j _ .•,.I�• • • • I i• I i �a- • Q• • ••SW:on�and— t • I i 41 ri O ; _• _•• r .? ! I---., , •• • t i Context •'.! 1 i i i •• . a• . ,• • • i • •• y. • r s i I , a. i Street • • t . • • 1 i!, •• ••• • • • ... _ :• '. • • • per „ i Railroad I:----:__ • • • f� i .,• • Si Durham • • • • 3• • • -. Water Feature • • i • • • •• •• •• •i Park vj ` • :) i City Limits i ii 1 ' at / I ' 00 lune 2019 , / 0 0 0.25 0.5Miles This page intentionally left blank. City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 Table 3-9: Pedestrian Signal Geospatial Proximity Priority Matrix A B C D E F Location of Citizen Location Serving Location Serving Location Serving Location Serving Priorities Priority Complaint or Government Transportation/High High Use Commercial Location Serving (Category) Description Request(ADA Offices&Public Use Pedestrian Pedestrian Districts, Other Areas Title II Program Facilities Corridor Corridor Employers Access) See 1 Category 1 Al B1 Cl Dl El Fl Description High Priority-- I See 2 Category 2 A2 B2 C2 D2 E2 F2 Description See 3 Category 3 A3 B3 C3 D3 E3 F3 Description Medium Priority . - I Pedestrian 4 Signal No A4 B4 C4 D4 E4 F4 Deficiencies *The priorities listed under columns B, C, E, and F are specified under title II 28 CFR Section 35.150 (d). 61 City of Tigard J ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 3.4.7 Pedestrian Signal Barrier Descriptions Category 1: Category 3: • Accessible pedestrian signal64 is not provided. • Pushbutton is located more than 10 feet from curb, shoulder,or • Pedestrian crossing time is insufficient. pavement. • Pushbutton is farther than five feet from the crosswalk line Category 2: farthest from the intersection (when applicable). • The facility is located along an arterial or collector roadway and: • Pushbutton height is not within 42 to 48 inches above the o Level clear space at push button not provided. o Reach to push button from clear space is obstructed. ground. o Operating force of pushbutton exceeds five pounds of force. • Pushbutton and arrow are not parallel with the direction of o The pushbutton does not have a sign adjacent to or integral with travel. the pushbutton. • Distance between two pushbuttons on the same corner is less o Pushbutton sign does not clearly indicate which crosswalk signal is than 10 feet. actuated. • The facility is located along a neighborhood or local roadway o Pushbutton pilot light(if applicable)does not activate. and: o A locator tone is not provided. o Level clear space at push button not provided. o A tactile arrow is not provided or does not provide vibrotactile walk o Reach to push button from clear space is obstructed. indications. o Pushbutton locator tone activates at incorrect time. o Operating force of pushbutton exceeds five pounds of force. o Pushbutton locator tone duration and intensity needs adjustment. o The pushbutton does not have a sign adjacent to or integral o Audible features of accessible pedestrian signal needs adjustment. with the pushbutton. o Speech walk or wait message of accessible pedestrian signal needs o Pushbutton sign does not clearly indicate which crosswalk adjustment. signal is actuated. o Extended pushbutton feature needs adjustment. o Pushbutton pilot light(if applicable) does not activate. o A locator tone is not provided. o A tactile arrow is not provided or does not provide vibrotactile walk indications. 64 As defined by the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices,which required audible and vibrotactile features. 62 City of Tigard ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 Category 3(continued): Category 4: o Pushbutton locator tone activates at incorrect time. • No deficiency identified o Pushbutton locator tone duration and intensity needs adjustment. o Audible features of accessible pedestrian signal needs adjustment. o Speech walk or wait message of accessible pedestrian signal needs adjustment. o Extended pushbutton feature needs adjustment. 63 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 Table 3-10: Pedestrian Signal Barrier Summary Category 1 Category Priority Instances Percent of Total Schedule Year High Priority 1 B1 4 2.6% 1-5 1 Cl 124 81.6% 1-15 1 D1 24 15.8% 1-15 Subtotal 152 100.0% - Total for All Projects 152 100.0% - Table 3-11 describes the subset of information collected for each of the pedestrian signals.The category 2 attributes are identified in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices as a standard and the category 3 attributes are identified as guidance. Table 3-11: Pedestrian Signal Barrier Summary Category 2 and Category 3 Category Priority Instances Percent of Total Schedule Year Category 2 2 B2 3 2.0% 1-15 2 C2 104 68.4% 1-15 2 D2 21 13.8% 1-15 Subtotal 128 84.2% - Category 3 3 B3 1 0.7% 1-15 3 C3 20 13.2% 1-15 3 D3 3 2.0% 1-15 Subtotal 24 15.8% - Total for All Projects 152 100.0% - 64 I' 1 1 r: i 1 1111 i _ _ - r T I GARD •' 11 �'- - - -'i • O f E • — Tigard ADA Self-Evaluation&Transition Plan Pedestrian Signal Barrier • • - w Removal Projects /j SWWWalnut St r--1 • r ' • Ir ._i ,. j Barrier Removal Rank i ;LJ '�=t-=-=L, ` • i • High Priority I , 1 I \,y 1 I 1 r -•-1 i1_S--fl----------� SWGaardaSt 1 i'• I SW McDonald St I I _ , i 1--,.]SW I 1, Li Ir.• I 1 I -lI i I ��'=�� r SW Bonita Rd • • ! 1110 I. — — — ; r i J---.1 f r--- — Context i I 1 I 4- i a I — — i i i! Street I j 1 , , r1 . 1 — — -1 ��.'v i' Railroad /t� • i 1 • SW Durham Rd_�_—_._.. •__ .• • Water Feature ii i-- — r „): I \.,/ Park L._ ,r"". ] I City Limits i / �,�„•,.r' f , ® 0 June 2019 0NNE Miles • '� 0 0.25 0.5 This page intentionally left blank. City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 3.5 Barrier Removal Considerations for Plan Implementation Title II of the ADA requires a public entity to "operate each service, program or activity so that the service, program or activity, when viewed in its entirety, is readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities."65 This requirement does not: • necessarily require a public entity to make each of its existing facilities accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities; • require a public entity to take any action that would threaten or destroy the historic significance of an historic property; or • require a public entity to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a service, program, or activity or impose undue financial and administrative burdens. The responsibility for ensuring barrier removal will reside with the City's ADA Coordinator.This process will be accomplished with two strategies: policy and procedure modifications to remove programmatic barriers, and maintenance and construction projects to remove structural barriers.Two conditions that determine when barriers must be removed: to provide access to programs, activities, and services, and when a facility is altered. 3.5.1 Program Accessibility A state or local government's programs, when viewed in their entirety, must be readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities. People with disabilities cannot be excluded due to the inaccessibility of a public entity's facilities.This standard, known as program accessibility, applies to facilities of a public entity that existed on January 26, 1992. Public entities do not necessarily have to make each of their existing facilities accessible, and structural changes to existing facilities may not be required where other methods are effective in achieving program access. As mandated by title II of the ADA, this Transition Plan presents a schedule for removing facility barriers to accessing the City's programs, activities, and services. 3.5.2 Facility Alterations Although structural changes may not be mandated for program accessibility, the City is required to remove physical barriers when it alters a facility. Alterations are defined in the ADA standards as a change in a building or facility that affects or could affect its usability. Many types of projects are considered alterations, including remodeling, renovation, rehabilitation, reconstruction, restoration, resurfacing of circulation paths or vehicular ways, and changes or rearrangement of structural parts, elements, or walls. Normal maintenance, reroofing, painting or wallpapering, or changes to mechanical and electrical systems are not considered alterations unless they affect a facility's usability. For example, a project limited to an HVAC system that 65 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart D§35.150 Existing facilities 67 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 includes the addition of thermostats would affect a facility's usability because it involves elements such as operable parts that are covered by the standards. The standards ensure that the opportunities for accessibility presented by an alteration are taken. How and to what extent the standards apply is determined by the scope of a project and the elements and spaces altered. Only those elements or spaces altered are required to comply, but alterations made to areas containing a primary function, that is, a major activity for which a facility is intended, also require an accessible path of travel. Path of travel elements are restrooms, doors, telephones, drinking fountains, the route itself, and several other items. The City is not required to remove barriers identified within a City-owned facility as part of the Transition Plan: • where programmatic modifications can be made to provide an equivalent experience, • where there are nearby and available equivalent accessible features, • where there are no public programs or activities provided at that portion of the site, or • when safe harbor66 conditions are met. It is also possible that an alteration is technically infeasible, in which case compliance is not required.Technical infeasibility refers to "something that has little likelihood of being accomplished because existing structural conditions would require removing or altering a load- bearing member that is an essential part of the structural frame; or because other existing physical or site constraints prohibit modification or addition of elements, spaces, or features that are in full and strict compliance with the minimum requirements."67 Where technical infeasibility is encountered, compliance is still required to the maximum extent technically feasible.68 For example, if providing accessibility for people with one type of disability is not feasible, accessibility must still be provided for people with other types of disabilities to the maximum extent feasible. 66 The concept of safe harbor is explained later in this chapter under'Safe Harbor Provisions' 67 2010 ADA Standards, 106.5 68 2010 ADA Standards, 202.3 68 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 3.5.3 Public Right-of-Way Alterations and New Construction In an alteration or new construction project in the public right-of-way, the City must incorporate ADA accessibility standards to the maximum extent feasible.69 As part of the Plan's implementation, the City Engineering Division should document all design exceptions. The ADA title II toolkit incorporates the following guidance about sidewalks and curb ramps:70 • When pre-ADA streets or sidewalks are altered, space limitations may restrict the ability to install accessible curb ramps. In these cases, the installed curb ramps must comply with the ADA to the maximum extent feasible, but there are still requirements to meet. • In rare instances when it is technically infeasible to install a fully compliant curb ramp during alterations to pre-ADA roadways and walkways because of physical or site constraints, state and local governments must still provide accessibility to the maximum extent feasible. Before reaching a conclusion about technical infeasibility, public entities should consider the extent to which physical or site constraints can be addressed by alternative curb ramp designs. The burden of proving technical infeasibility lies with the state or local government that constructed it. • When highways, streets, and roads are built or altered post-ADA, they must have curb ramps at certain locations: wherever there are curbs or other barriers to entry from a pedestrian walkway or sidewalk, wherever there are curbs or other barriers to entry at any designated pedestrian crosswalks that are located mid-block, wherever sidewalks or walkways intersect with highways, streets, or roads and pedestrians may legally cross the vehicular way, and at public transportation stops. • For pre-ADA highways, streets, roads, and sidewalks that have not been altered, public entities may choose to construct curb ramps at every point where a pedestrian walkway intersects a curb, but they are not necessarily required to do so. Alternative routes to buildings may be acceptable where people with disabilities must travel only a marginally longer route than the general public. 69 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart D §35.151(b) Existing facilities 70 See https://www.ada.gov/pcatoolkit/chap6toolkit.htm. 69 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 3.5.4 Safe Harbor Provisions The 2010 Standards introduced the concept of safe harbor, a new exception that allows facilities built prior to March 15, 2012 that were in compliance with the 1991 ADA Standards to remain as-is until a public entity plans an alteration to the structural feature. For example, the 1991 Standards allowed 54 inches maximum for a side reach range, while the 2010 Standards lowered the side reach range to 48 inches maximum. Existing items, built prior to March 15, 2012, that are positioned at the 54-inch height would fall under the safe harbor provision until the time of planned alterations.71 This safe harbor is not a blanket exemption for facilities. If a public entity undertakes an alteration to a primary function area, only the required elements of a path of travel to that area that already comply with the 1991 Standards are subject to the safe harbor. If a public entity undertakes an alteration to a primary function area and the required elements of a path of travel to the altered area do not comply with the 1991 Standards, then the public entity must bring those elements into compliance with the 2010 Standards.72 This exception applies to elements that might otherwise have to be modified under: • the program access requirement for public entities, • the readily achievable barrier removal requirements for places of public accommodation, or • the path of travel requirement for any alteration that affects the usability of a primary function area in any covered facility. If a public entity constructed or altered required elements of a path of travel in accordance with the specifications in either the 1991 Standards or the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards before March 15, 2012, the public entity is not required to retrofit such elements to reflect incremental changes in the 2010 Standards solely because of an alteration to a primary function area served by that path of travel.73 The 2010 Standards also identity structural elements that do not fall under the safe harbor provision.74 The following elements are not eligible for element-by-element safe harbor 71 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart D§35.150(b)(2)(i)Safe harbor 72 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart D§ 35.151(b)(4)(ii)(C) Path of travel--safe harbor 73 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart D§ 35.150(b)(2)(ii)Safe Harbor 74 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart D§ 35.150(b)(2)(ii)Safe Harbor 70 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 because technical or scoping specifications for them were not addressed in the 1991 ADA but were added as supplemental requirements prior to 2010: • Residential facilities dwelling units, sections 233 and 809. • Amusement rides, sections 234 and 1002; 206.2.9; 216.12. • Recreational boating facilities, sections 235 and 1003; 206.2.10. • Exercise machines and equipment, sections 236 and 1004; 206.2.13. • Fishing piers and platforms, sections 237 and 1005; 206.2.14. • Golf facilities, sections 238 and 1006; 206.2.15. • Miniature golf facilities, sections 239 and 1007; 206.2.16. • Play areas, sections 240 and 1008; 206.2.17. • Saunas and steam rooms, sections 241 and 612. • Swimming pools, wading pools, and spas, sections 242 and 1009 • Shooting facilities with firing positions, sections 243 and 1010. • Miscellaneous: o Team or player seating (section 221.2.1.4), o Accessible route to bowling lanes (section. 206.2.11), and o Accessible route in court sports facilities (section 206.2.12). Pedestrian signals are not included in the 1991 or 2010 ADA Standards, but are addressed in the 2011 PROWAG and the previous draft documents from 2005 and 2002. Unlike the safe harbor concept contained within the 2010 ADA Standards, the proposed guidelines do not require modifications to existing pedestrian signals until the signal controller and software are altered, or the signal head is replaced.75. 3.5.5 Undue Burden The City is not required to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of its services, programs, or activities; would create a hazardous condition resulting in a direct threat to a program participant or others; or would represent an undue financial and administrative burden. A determination of undue financial or administrative burden can only be made under specified circumstances and procedures and carries with it the obligation of taking other actions that would ensure, to the maximum extent possible, that individuals with disabilities receive the benefits and services of the program or activity.The decision that compliance would result in such alteration or burdens must be made by the head of a public entity or his or her designee after considering all resources available for use in the funding and operation of the service, program, or activity, and must be accompanied 75 United States Access Board, Proposed Accessibility Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way, 2011—R209.2 Alterations 71 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 by a written statement of the reasons for reaching that conclusion. If an action would result in such an alteration or such burdens, a public entity shall take any other action that would not result in such an alteration or such burdens but would nevertheless ensure that individuals with disabilities receive the benefits or services provided by the public entity.76 76 DOJ,Title II Regulations Subpart D §35.150(a)(3) General 72 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 4 ADA Coordinator, Notice Policy, and Grievance Procedure 4.1 ADA Coordinator Roles and Responsibilities The ADA Coordinator is responsible for organizing and communicating the City's efforts to comply with and fulfill its responsibilities under title II of the ADA, as well as all other applicable state and federal laws. The ADA Coordinator's responsibilities also include investigating complaints that the City has engaged in any action prohibited by title II. At the time of the preparation of this Plan, the City's designated ADA Coordinator is Nadine Robinson. The City will continue to provide the name, office address, and telephone number of its ADA Coordinator to interested persons. 4.2 Notice Under the Americans with Disabilities Act In accordance with the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of Tigard, Oregon, will not discriminate against qualified individuals with disabilities on the basis of disability in its services, programs, or activities. Employment:The City of Tigard does not discriminate on the basis of disability in its hiring or employment practices and complies with all regulations promulgated by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Effective Communication:The City will generally, upon request, provide appropriate aids and services leading to effective communication for qualified persons with disabilities so they can participate equally in City programs, services, and activities, including qualified sign language interpreters, documents in Braille, and other ways of making information and communications accessible to people who have speech, hearing, or vision impairments. Modifications to Policies and Procedures:The City will make all reasonable modifications to policies and programs to ensure that people with disabilities have an equal opportunity to enjoy all City programs, services, and activities. For example, individuals with service animals are welcomed in City offices, even where pets are generally prohibited. Anyone who requires an auxiliary aid or service for effective communication, or a modification of policies or procedures to participate in a City program, service, or activity, should contact the person or department who scheduled the event as soon as possible but no later than 48 hours before the scheduled event. In the event the person is unavailable, please contact Nadine Robinson, ADA Coordinator, at 503-718-2481 or Nadine@tigard-or.gov. The ADA does not require the City to take any action that would fundamentally alter the nature of its programs or services, or impose an undue financial or administrative burden. 73 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 Complaints that a City program, service, or activity is not accessible to persons with disabilities should be directed to: Nadine Robinson, ADA Coordinator 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223 503-718-2481 Voice 1503-684-2772 TTY Email — Nadine@tigard-or.gov The City will not place a surcharge on a particular individual with a disability or any group of individuals with disabilities to cover the cost of providing auxiliary aids/services or reasonable modifications of policy, such as retrieving items from locations that are open to the public but are not accessible to persons who use wheelchairs. 4.3 ADA Grievance Procedure The City of Tigard has adopted a grievance procedure providing for prompt and equitable resolution of complaints alleging any action prohibited by the U.S. Department of Justice regulations implementing Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Complaints should be addressed to: Nadine Robinson, ADA Coordinator, City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon, 97223, (Phone 503-718-2481 or TTY 503-684-2772) who has been designated to coordinate ADA compliance efforts. 2. A complaint regarding access or discrimination should be filed in writing or verbally. It must contain the name and address of the person filing it, and briefly describe the alleged violation of the regulations. 3. A complaint should be filed within thirty days after the complainant becomes aware of the alleged violation. 4. An investigation, as may be appropriate, shall follow a filing of a complaint. The ADA Coordinator or designee shall conduct the investigation.This procedure anticipates informal but thorough investigations, affording all interested persons and their representative, if any, an opportunity to submit evidence relevant to the complaint. 5. The ADA Coordinator shall issue a written determination as to the validity of the complaint and a description of the resolution, if any, within 30 calendar days. 6. If the complaint cannot be resolved to the satisfaction of the complainant by the ADA Coordinator, it shall be forwarded to the Hearings Officer. The City will retain the services of a Hearings Officer. The Hearings Officer shall establish ground rules or procedures for hearing complaints, requests, or suggestions from disabled persons regarding access to and participation in public facilities, services, activities, and functions in the City. The Hearings Officer shall hear complaints in sessions open to the public, after adequate notice, in an unbiased, objective manner, and issue a written decision within 30 calendar days of notification. 74 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 7. If the complaint can't be resolved to the satisfaction of the Complainant by the Hearings Officer, it shall be forwarded to the City Council.The Council at a public meeting shall hear the complaint. A determination shall be made within 30 calendar days from the date of the hearing.The decision of the City Council is final. 8. The ADA Coordinator shall maintain the files and records of the City of Tigard relating to the complaints filed. 9. The right of a person to a prompt and equitable resolution of the complaint filed, hereunder, shall not be impaired by the person's pursuit of other remedies, such as the filing of an ADA complaint with the responsible federal department or agency. Use of this grievance procedure is not a prerequisite to the pursuit of other remedies. 10. These rules shall be construed to protect the substantive rights of interested persons to meet the appropriate due process standards, and to assure that the City of Tigard complies with the ADA and implementing regulations. 11.Timelines referred to above concerning the scheduling of hearings may be extended if, after reasonable effort and justification, the hearing cannot be conducted within the 30- calendar day limitation period. 12. All decisions shall be sent by regular mail to the complainant within 30 calendar days of the date of the hearing and shall be retained in the program file. Phone notification shall also be made in cases involving visually impaired individuals. 13. The ADA Coordinator may modify this grievance and appeal process in order to assure equal access to programs, services and activities for people with disabilities. 14. Nothing in this grievance process is meant to be used for any personnel, EEO, or labor agreement grievance procedure for the City of Tigard. Contact the City Human Resources Department for further information regarding Title I grievances. 75 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 This page intentionally left blank. 76 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 5 Definitions and Acronyms The following is a summary of many definitions found in the ADA. Please refer to the ADA for the full text of definitions and explanations." 5.1 List of Definitions Accessible. A site, building, facility or portion thereof is deemed accessible when it is approachable and usable by persons with disabilities in compliance with technical standards adopted by the relevant Administrative Authority. Administrative Authority. A governmental agency that adopts or enforces regulations and guidelines for the design, construction, or alteration of buildings and facilities. ADA Coordinator.The individual responsible for coordinating the efforts of the government entity to comply with title II and investigating any complaints that the entity has violated title II. Also known as Disability Access Manager or Accessibility Manager. Alteration in the Public Right-of-Way. A change to an existing facility that affects or could affect pedestrian access, circulation, or use. Alterations include, but are not limited to, resurfacing, rehabilitation, reconstruction, historic restoration, or changes or rearrangement of structural parts or elements of a facility. Alternative Text. Refers to the text equivalent for an image appearing in an online document. It is read by screen readers in place of the image so that the content and function of the image is accessible to people with visual or certain cognitive disabilities. Auxiliary Aids and Services. Refers to ways to communicate with people who have communication disabilities such as blindness, vision loss, deafness, hearing loss, a combination of vision and hearing loss or speech or language disorders. The key to deciding what aid or service is needed to communicate effectively with people with disabilities and their companions is to consider the nature, length, complexity and context of the communication as well as the person's normal method(s) of communication. Auxiliary aids and services include the use of interpreters, notetakers, readers, assistive listening systems, captioning and TTYs or the provision of alternate formats such as braille, ASCII text, large print, recorded audio and electronic formats like CDs and DVDs. Blended Transition.A raised pedestrian street crossings, depressed corners, or similar connections between the pedestrian access route at the level of the sidewalk and the level of the pedestrian street crossing that have a grade of five percent or less. "28 C.F.R. §35.104 Definitions. 77 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 Clear Ground Space.The minimum unobstructed ground space required to accommodate a single, stationary wheelchair and occupant. Clear ground space provides a location for a wheelchair user to approach and make use of an element. Complaint. A complaint is a claimed violation of the ADA. Cross Slope.The grade that is perpendicular to the direction of pedestrian travel. On a sidewalk, cross slope is measured perpendicular to the curb line or edge of the street or highway. Curb Line.A line at the face of the curb that marks the transition between the curb and the gutter, street, or highway. Curb Ramp. A ramp that cuts through or is built up to the curb. Curb ramps can be perpendicular or parallel, or a combination of parallel and perpendicular ramps. Disability.The term disability means, with respect to an individual: 1. A physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more of the major life activities of such individual; 2. A record of such impairment; or 3. Being regarded as having a disability or such impairment. Discrimination on the Basis of Disability. Discrimination on the basis of disability means to: • Limit, segregate, or classify a citizen in a way that may adversely affect opportunities or status because of the person's disability; • Limit, segregate, or classify a participant in a program or activity offered to the public in a way that may adversely affect opportunities or status because of the participant's disability; • Participate in a contract that could subject a qualified citizen with a disability to discrimination; • Use any standards, criteria, or methods of administration that have the effect of discriminating on the basis of disability; • Deny equal benefits because of a disability; • Fail to make reasonable modifications to known physical or mental limitations of an otherwise qualified individual with a disability unless it can be shown that the modification would impose an undue burden on the City's operations; • Use selection criteria that exclude otherwise qualified people with disabilities from participating in the programs or activities offered to the public; and • Fail to use tests, including eligibility tests, in a manner that ensures that the test results 78 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 accurately reflect the qualified applicant's skills or aptitude to participate in a program or activity. Effective Communication. Communication with people who have vision, hearing and/or speech disabilities that is equally effective as communication with people without disabilities. Element. An architectural or mechanical component of a building, facility, space, site, or public right-of-way. Facility. All or any portion of buildings, structures, improvements, elements, and pedestrian or vehicular routes located in the public right-of-way. Fundamental Alteration. A modification that is so significant that it alters the essential nature of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations offered. If a public entity can demonstrate that the modification would fundamentally alter the nature of its service, program, or activity, it is not required to make the modification. If a public accommodation (private entity) can demonstrate that a modification would fundamentally alter the nature of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations it provides, it is not required to make the modification. Grade.The degree of inclination of a surface. See Slope. In public right-of-way, grade is the slope parallel to the direction of pedestrian travel. Grade Break.The line where two surface planes with different grades meet. Having a Record of Impairment. An individual is disabled if he or she has a history of having an impairment that substantially limits the performance of a major life activity; or has been diagnosed, correctly or incorrectly, as having such impairment. International Symbol of Accessibility(ISA).The ISA is recognized worldwide as a symbol identifying accessible elements and spaces. Standards issued under the ADA and ABA Standards reference and reproduce the ISA to ensure consistency in the designation of accessible elements and spaces. Uniform iconography promotes legibility, especially for people with low vision or cognitive disabilities. Guidance on use of the ISA under the ADA is available at https://www.access-board.Rov/attachments/article/1898/ISA- guidance.pdf. Maintenance. Routine or periodic repair of all pedestrian facilities to restore them to the standards to which they were originally designed and built. Maintenance does not change the original purpose, intent, or design of public sidewalks, shared-use paths, curb ramps, crosswalks, pedestrian islands, or other public walkways. Operable Part. A component of an element used to insert or withdraw objects, or to activate, deactivate, or adjust the element.The technical requirements for operable parts apply to 79 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 operable parts on accessible pedestrian signals and pedestrian pushbuttons and parking meters and parking pay stations that serve accessible parking spaces. Other Power-Driven Mobility Device (OPDMD). Any mobility device powered by batteries, fuel, or other engines that is used by individuals with mobility disabilities for locomotion and designed to operate in areas without defined pedestrian routes. Path of Travel.A path of travel is a continuous, unobstructed way of pedestrian passage by means of which a newly constructed or altered area may be approached, entered and exited and which connects an area with an exterior approach (including sidewalks, streets and parking areas), an entrance to the facility and other parts of a facility. An accessible path of travel may consist of walks and sidewalks, curb ramps and other interior or exterior pedestrian ramps; clear floor paths through lobbies, corridors, rooms and other improved areas; parking access aisles; elevators and lifts; or a combination of these elements. Within the context of alterations, path of travel also includes restrooms, telephones, and drinking fountains serving the altered area. Pedestrian Access Route. A continuous and unobstructed path of travel provided for pedestrians with disabilities within or coinciding with a pedestrian circulation path in the public right-of-way. Pedestrian Circulation Path. A prepared exterior or interior surface provided for pedestrian travel in the public right-of-way Physical or Mental Impairments. Physical or mental impairments may include, but are not limited to, vision, speech and hearing impairments; emotional disturbance and mental illness; seizure disorders; mental retardation; orthopedic and neuromotor disabilities; learning disabilities; diabetes; heart disease; nervous conditions; cancer; asthma; Hepatitis B; HIV infection (HIV condition); and drug addiction, if the addict has successfully completed or is participating in a rehabilitation program and no longer uses illegal drugs. The following conditions are not physical or mental impairments: transvestitism; illegal drug use; homosexuality or bisexuality; compulsive gambling; kleptomania; pyromania; pedophilia; exhibitionism; voyeurism; pregnancy; height; weight; eye color; hair color; left-handedness; poverty; lack of education; a prison record; and poor judgment or quick temper, if not symptoms of a mental or physiological disorder. Practicable. Capable of being put into practice or being accomplished within the context of the facility and within the limits of the applicable ABA Conditions for Exception, 1019. Feasible. Primary Function.A major activity for which a facility is intended. Areas that contain a primary function include, but are not limited to, the dining area of a cafeteria, the meeting rooms in a conference center, as well as offices and other work areas in which the activities of the public entity using a facility are carried out. 80 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 Program Accessibility. A public entity's services, programs, or activities, when viewed in their entirety, must be readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities. Public Entity. Any state or local government; any department, agency, special-purpose district, or other instrumentality of a state or local government. Public Right-of-Way. Public land or property, usually in interconnected corridors, that is acquired for or dedicated to transportation purposes. Qualified Historic Facility. A facility that is listed in or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, or designated as historic under an appropriate state or local law. Qualified Individual with a Disability. A qualified individual with a disability means an individual with a disability who, with or without reasonable modification to rules, policies, or practices; the removal of architectural, communication, or transportation barriers; or the provision of auxiliary aids and services, meets the essential eligibility requirements for the receipt of services or the participation in programs or activities provided by the City. Reasonable Modification. A public entity must modify its policies, practice or procedures to avoid discrimination unless the modification would fundamentally alter the nature of its service, program or activity. Regarded as Having a Disability. An individual is disabled if she or he is treated or perceived as having an impairment that substantially limits major life activities, although no such impairment exists. Running Slope. The grade that is parallel to the direction of pedestrian travel. Scoping. Requirements that specify what features are required to be accessible and, where multiple features of the same type are provided, how many of the features are required to be accessible. Service Animal. Service animals are dogs (and in certain circumstances, miniature horses) that are individually trained to perform tasks for people with disabilities. Examples of such work or tasks include guiding people who are blind, alerting people who are deaf, pulling a wheelchair, alerting and protecting a person who is having a seizure, reminding a person with mental illness to take prescribed medications, calming a person with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) during an anxiety attack, or performing other duties. Service animals are working animals, not pets. The work or task a dog has been trained to provide must be directly related to the person's disability. Dogs whose sole function is to provide comfort or emotional support do not qualify as service animals under the ADA. Guidance on the use of the term service animal in the 2010 Standards is published online at https://www.ada.gov/service animals 2010.htm. Title II regulations now include assessment factors to assist public entities in determining whether miniature horses can be accommodated as service animals in their facilities: 81 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 1. whether the miniature horse is housebroken; 2. whether the miniature horse is under the owner's control; 3. whether the facility can accommodate the miniature horse's type, size and weight; 4. whether the miniature horse's presence will not compromise legitimate safety requirements necessary for safe operation of the facility. Slope. Ground surface that forms a natural or artificial incline. Slope is typically conveyed as either a percentage or a ratio that represent the change in elevation between two points of an incline divided by the horizontal distance between the two points. • Cross Slope.The slope that is perpendicular to the direction of travel. • Running Slope.The slope that is parallel to the direction of travel Substantial Limitations of Major Life Activities. An individual is disabled if she or he has a physical or mental impairment that (a) renders her or him unable to perform a major life activity, or (b) substantially limits the condition, manner or duration under which she or he can perform a particular major life activity in comparison to other people. Major life activities are functions such as caring for oneself, performing manual tasks, walking, seeing, hearing, speaking, breathing, learning and working. In determining whether physical or mental impairment substantially limits the condition, manner or duration under which an individual can perform a particular major life activity in comparison to other people, the following factors shall be considered: • The nature and severity of the impairment; • The duration or expected duration of the impairment; and • The permanent or long-term impact(or expected impact) of or resulting from the impairment. Technical Standards. Specify the design criteria for accessible features, including the specific numbers, conditions, and measurements that are required. Technically Infeasible. With respect to an alteration of a building or a facility, something that has little likelihood of being accomplished because existing structural conditions would require removing or altering a load-bearing member that is an essential part of the structural frame; or because other existing physical or site constraints prohibit modification or addition of elements, spaces or features that are in full and strict compliance with the minimum requirements. Telecommunications Display Device (TDD). A telecommunications display device for the deaf (TDD) is an electronic device for text communication via a telephone line, used when one or more of the parties has hearing or speech difficulties. Other names for TDD include M. Telecommunications Relay Service (TRS)or 711.The free, nationwide telecommunications relay service, reached by calling 711, uses communications assistants who serve as 82 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 intermediaries between people who have hearing or speech disabilities who use a text telephone (TTY) or text messaging and people who use standard voice telephones. The communications assistant tells the telephone user what the other party is typing and types to tell the other party what the telephone user is saying.TRS also provides speech-to-speech transliteration for callers who have speech disabilities. Text Telephone (TTY).Teletypewriters or text telephones have a keyboard and a visual display for exchanging written messages over the telephone.The ADA established a free, nationwide relay network to handle voice-to-TTY and TTY-to-voice calls, which is reached by calling 711. TTY is a more general term for teletypes but is often referred to as TDD. Vertical Surface Discontinuities. Vertical differences in level between two adjacent surfaces. Video Relay Service (VRS). Video relay service (VRS) is a free, subscriber-based service for people who use sign language and have videophones, smart phones, or computers with video communication capabilities. For outgoing calls, the subscriber contacts the VRS interpreter, who places the call and serves as an intermediary between the subscriber and a person who uses a standard voice telephone.The interpreter tells the telephone user what the subscriber is signing and signs to the subscriber what the telephone user is saying. Wheeled Mobility Device.A manually operated or power-driven device designed primarily for use by an individual with a mobility disability for the main purpose of indoor or of both indoor and outdoor locomotion. Also referred to as a manual wheelchair, a power wheelchair, or an electric scooter. 83 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 5.2 List of Acronyms ABA—Architectural Barriers Act ADA—Americans with Disabilities Act ADAAG —ADA Accessibility Guidelines ASL—American Sign Language CFR—Code of Federal Regulations DOJ— U.S. Department of Justice ISA— International Symbol of Accessibility MUTCD—Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices OPDMD—Other Power-Driven Mobility Device PROWAG — Proposed Accessibility Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way TDD—Telecommunications Display Device TRS—Telephone Relay Service or 711 TTY—Text Telephone VRI —Video Remote Interpreting Services VRS—Video Relay Service 84 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 6 Resources 6.1 Oregon and National Organizations Supporting People with Disabilities Access Recreation Access Recreation is a Portland, Oregon ad hoc committee that developed guidelines for minimum information that should be provided about hiking trails and outdoor facilities to benefit hikers with disabilities, and which can be applied to websites, printed materials, and at trail sites. The committee is made up of representatives from federal, state, and local park agencies and organizations that support people with disabilities. http://accessrecreation.org/horne/Access Recreation Horne.html Adaptive Sports Northwest Adaptive Sports Northwest provides adaptive sports and recreation opportunities to those in Oregon and southwest Washington, and seeks to tap the potential of possibility in each participant. The organization has partnerships with the United States Paralympic Committee, Wheelchair&Ambulatory Sports USA, and Disabled Sports USA. http://www.adaptivesportsnw.org/ Aging and Disability Resource Connection of Oregon (ADRC) ADRC is a statewide resource providing information about local public and privately paid services to address aging or disability needs. The organization's trained professional staff can help with immediate needs or planning for the future. https://adrcoforegon.org The Arc The Arc (formerly Association for Retarded Citizens of the United States) is the country's largest voluntary organization committed to the welfare of all children and adults with mental retardation and their families. http://www.thearc.org American Association of People with Disabilities The American Association of People with Disabilities is the largest nonprofit, nonpartisan, cross- disability organization in the United States. http://www.aapd.com/ American Foundation for the Blind(AFB) AFB is committed to improving accessibility in all aspects of life—from cell phones to ATMs, on web sites, and in workplaces. Services include assistance in making products and services accessible to people with visual impairments. AFB offers expert consulting services and accessible media production. AFB provides objective product evaluations of adaptive 85 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 technologies through its assistive technology product database. http://www.afb.org/ Autism Society of Oregon This affiliate of the Autism Society, the nation's leading grassroots autism organization, exists to improve the lives of all affected by autism by increasing public awareness about the day-to-day issues faced by people on the spectrum, advocating for appropriate services for individuals across the lifespan, and providing the latest information regarding treatment, education, research, and advocacy. http://autismsocietyoregon.org/ Center on Technology and Disability Funded by the U.S. Department of Education's Office of Special Education Programs, the Center on Technology and Disability provides a wide range of resources on assistive technology, from introductory fact sheets and training materials to in-depth discussion of best practices and emerging research. http://www.ctdinstitute.org/ Disability Resources, Inc. (DRI) DRI is a national nonprofit organization that provides information about resources for independent living. DRI maintains an on-line directory of assistive technology resources. http://www.disabilityresources.org/ Disability Rights Oregon (DRO) DRO promotes and defends the rights of individuals with disabilities. DRO is a non-profit law office that provides advocacy and legal services to people with disabilities who have an issue related to their disability and that falls within their goals and priorities. Each year DRO sets its goals and priorities, with help from the disability community, to guide the work they do and to further their mission and vision. https://droregon.org/ Institute for Human Centered Design The Institute (formerly known as Adaptive Environments) is a non-profit organization committed to advancing the role of design in expanding opportunity and enhancing experience for people of all ages and abilities.The organization provides education and consultation to public and private entities about strategies, precedents and best practices that go beyond legal requirements for human centered design for places, things, communication and policy that integrate solutions with the reality of human diversity. http://humancentereddesign.org/ National Association of the Deaf(NAD) NAD is a national consumer organization representing people who are deaf and hard of hearing. NAD provides information about standards for American Sign Language Interpreters 86 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 and the Captioned Media Program on its website. http://www.nad.org/ National Council on Disability(NCD) NCD is an independent federal agency charged with advising the President, Congress, and other federal agencies regarding policies, programs, practices, and procedures that affect people with disabilities. https://ncd.gov/ National Federation of the Blind(NFB) NFB is a national organization advocating on behalf of persons who are blind or have low vision. NFB provides on-line resources for technology for the blind, including a technology resource list, a computer resource list, screen access technology, sources of large print software for computers, and sources of closed-circuit TV (CCTV). http://www.nfb.org/ National Organization on Disability National Organization on Disability promotes the full and equal participation and contribution of America's 54 million men, women and children with disabilities in all aspects of life. NOD maintains an on-line directory of information and links including transportation-related resources. http://www.nod.org/ Northwest ADA Center, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research The ADA National Network Centers are a national platform of ADA professionals and experts charged with assisting businesses, state and local governments, and people with disabilities as they manage the process of changing our culture to be user friendly to disability and the effect the variety of health conditions can have on society. The Northwest ADA Center is a part of the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine at the University of Washington, and collaborates with the Center for Technology and Disability Studies, a program within the Center for Human Development and Disability and the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine. http://nwadacenter.org/ Oregon Disabilities Commission (ODC) Initially formed in 1983 and re-formed in 2005, ODC is a governor-appointed commission housed in the Department of Human Services. The commission is composed of 15 members broadly representative of major public and private agencies that are experienced in or have demonstrated particular interest in the needs of individuals with disabilities. http://www.oregon.gov/DHS/SENIORS-DISABILITIES/ADVISORY/ODC/Pages/index.aspx 87 City of Tigard l ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 Oregon Technology Access Program (OTAP) OTAP provides training, information, technical assistance, and resources regarding the uses of technology for children with disabilities. Services are available to anyone concerned with the needs of Oregon's children with disabilities from birth to age 21. The program is sponsored by the Oregon Department of Education. http://www.otap-oregon.org Paralyzed Veterans of America (PVA) PVA is a national advocacy organization representing veterans. PVA's Sports and Recreation Program promotes a range of activities for people with disabilities, with special emphasis on activities that enhance lifetime health and fitness. PVA's website provides information on useful sports publications and a list of contacts. http://www.pva.org State Independent Living Council(SILC) SILC is a federally mandated, governor-appointed body, designed to ensure that people with disabilities have a major role in designing Oregon's Independent Living program services. The Independent Living Services Program is a nonresidential, consumer-directed model of peer support, information and referral, skills training, and advocacy for people with disabilities. http://www.oregon.gov/DHS/SENIORS-DISABILITIES/SILC/pages/index.aspx TVW Inc. TVW helps people with disabilities prepare for, find, attain, and maintain employment to become more self-sufficient and independent. The organization operates a work-place readiness training program that includes vocational training, communication skills in the workplace, interviewing, attire, appropriate language, and more. Career development services include discovery, vocational assessments,job development, and job coaching. http://www.tv-workshop.com/ United Cerebral Palsy Association (UCP) UCP's mission is to advance the independence, productivity and full citizenship of people with cerebral palsy and other disabilities, through a commitment to the principles of independence, inclusion, and self-determination. http.//www.ucp.org United Spinal Association United Spinal Association is a membership organization serving individuals with spinal cord injuries or disease. Formerly known as the Eastern Paralyzed Veterans Association, the organization expanded its mission to serve people with spinal cord injuries or disease regardless of their age, gender or veteran status. Information on accessibility training and consulting services and recreational opportunities for people with spinal cord injuries or disease is 88 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 available on their website. http://www.unitedspinal.org World Institute on Disability WID is an international public policy center dedicated to carrying out research on disability issues. WID maintains an online information and resource directory on technology, research, universal design, and ADA. http://www.wid.org/resources/ 6.2 Guidance Documents and Organizations—General A Planning Guide for Making Temporary Events Accessible to People with Disabilities ADA National Network. 2015. https://adata.org/publication/temporary-events-guide AbleData (assistive technology) http://www.abledata.com/abledata.cfm Accessible Public Event Checklist San Francisco, City and County. 2018. http://sfgov.org/mod/accessible-public-event-checklist ASSISTIVETECH.NET-- The National Public Website on Assistive Technology http://www.assistivetech.net/ Disabled Sports USA Challenge Magazine. http://www.disabledsportsusa.org/about/news/challenge-magazine/ Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Telecommunications Access for People with Disabilities. 2017. http://transition.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/section255.pdf Telecommunications Relay Service—TRS. 2017. https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications-relay-service-trs National Center on Accessibility Indiana University, Bloomington. http://www.ncaonline.org/resources/ North Carolina State University: The Center for Universal Design https://proiects.ncsu.edu/ncsu/design/cud/ Pacific ADA Center http://www.adapacific.org/ Planning Accessible Meetings and Events American Bar Association Commission on Disability Rights. 2015. https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/mental physical disability/Ac cessible Meetings Toolkit.authcheckdam.pdf 89 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 Program Access:Beyond Bricks and Mortar National Center on Accessibility. Skulski, Jennifer and Gary Robb. Indiana University, Bloomington. 2006. http://www.ncaonline.org/resources/articles/program-access.shtml TTY and TTY Relay Services National Association of the Deaf(NAD). https://www.nad.org/resources/technology/telephone-and-relay-services/tty-and-tty-relay- services/ What to Know Before You Go: The Big Questions to Ask Before Arriving at Your Accessible Recreation Destination National Center on Physical Activity and Disability. https://www.nchpad.org/277/1750/Wharto-Know-Before-You-Go^^The-BicQuestions-to- Ask-Before^'Arriving-arYour—Accessible—Recreation^'Destination 6.3 Guidance Documents and Articles—Web Design National Center for Accessible Media (NCAM) NCAM is a research and development facility dedicated to addressing barriers to media and emerging technologies for people with disabilities in their homes, schools, workplaces, and communities. NCAM is part of the Media Access Group at Boston public broadcaster WGBH, which includes two production units, The Caption Center and Descriptive Video Service° (DVS°).Tools and guidelines for creating accessible media can be downloaded from the NCAM website at http://ncam.wgbh.org/invent build/web multimedia/tools-guidelines. Utah State University, Center for Persons with Disabilities, WebAIM WebAIM (Web Accessibility in Mind) has provided comprehensive web accessibility solutions since 1999. WebAIM is a non-profit organization based at the Center for Persons with Disabilities at Utah State University. Documents and training materials, including the following publications, can also be downloaded from WebAIM website (http://www.webaim.org/). • Color Contrast Checker. https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/ • Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool (WAVE). http://wave.webaim.org/ • Section 508 Checklist. https://webaim.org/standards/508/checklist • Web Accessibility for Designers. https://webaim.org/resources/designers/ Web Accessibility Initiative(WAI) WAI develops guidelines widely regarded as the international standard for Web accessibility, support materials to help understand and implement Web accessibility, and resources, through international collaboration. The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) was developed with a goal of providing a single shared standard for web content accessibility that meets the needs of individuals, organizations, and governments internationally. Documents and training 90 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 materials, including the following publications, can also be downloaded from the WAI website (https://www.w3.org/WAI/ ). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG)2.0 Caldwell, Ben, Michael Cooper, Loretta Guarino Reed, and Gregg Vanderheiden (eds.) 2008. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/ 6.4 Guidance Documents and Articles—Signage APH Tactile Graphic Image Library American Printing House for the Blind, Inc. (APH). http://www.aph.org/tgil/ Effective Color Contrast: Designing for People with Partial Sight and Color Deficiencies Arditi, Aries. 2005 http://1i129-107.members.linode.com/accessibility/design/accessible-print- design/effective-color-contrast/ G18: Ensuring that a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1 exists between text(and images of text) and background behind the text Techniques for WCAG 2.0. W3C Working Group Note. Cooper, Michael, Andrew Kirkpatrick, and Joshue 0 Connor (eds). October 2016. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/G18.html Signage and the 2010 ADA Standards v2.1 Luminant Design LLC. 2011. http://www.luminantdesign.com/ada.html Requirements in the 2010 Standards for Accessible Design Society for Experiential Graphic Design (SEGD). Signage 2012. https://segd.org/sites/default/files/SEGD 2012 ADA White Paper Update.pdf Harpers Ferry Center Accessibility Committee U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service Harpers Ferry Center serves as the Interpretive Design Center for the National Park Service. It works to ensure that the highest level of accessibility that is reasonable is incorporated into all aspects of interpretive media, planning, design, and construction. This includes ensuring that all new interpretive media are accessible to and usable by all people with disabilities. It also means all existing practices and procedures are evaluated to determine the degree to which they are currently accessible to all visitors, and modifications are made to assure conformance with applicable laws and regulations. The Center's website includes resources, guidelines, updates, photographs of best practices, and more. • Wayside Exhibits: A Guide to Developing Outdoor Interpretive Exhibits. 2009. https://www.nps.gov/hfc/pdf/waysides/wayside-guide-first-edition.pdf • Programmatic Accessibility Guidelines for National Park Service Interpretive Media, v2.3. 2017. https://www.nps.gov/hfc/accessibility/guidelines/ 91 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 6.5 Guidance Documents and Articles—Creating Accessible Documents A Guide to Making Documents Accessible to People Who Are Blind or Visually Impaired Sutton, Jennifer. 2002. http://www.sabeusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/A-Guide-to- Making-Documents-Accessible-to-People-Who-are-Blind-or-Visually-Impaired.pdf Best Practices and Guidelines for Large Print Documents used by the Low Vision Community American Council of the Blind (ACB). 2011. http://acb.org/large-print-guidelines Braille Transcription Resource List National Federation of the Blind. https://nfb.org/braille-transcription-resource-list Create and verify PDF accessibility(Acrobat Pro) Adobe. https://helpx.adobe.com/acrobat/using/create-verify-pdf-accessibility.html Creating Accessible PDFs with Adobe Acrobat Professional U. S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Section 508 Support Office. 2016. https://www.section508.va.gov/support/tutorials/pdf/index.asp GSA Government-wide Section 508 Accessibility Program Guidance on creating and testing accessible documents includes: • Create Accessible Electronic Documents https://www.section508.gov/content/build/create-accessible-documents • Section 508 Basic Authoring and Testing Guides, MS Word 2010 and MS 2013. 2015. https://www.section508.gov/content/build/create-accessible-documents • Basic Authoring and Testing Checklists, MS Word 2010 and MS 2013. 2015. https://www.section508.gov/content/build/create-accessible-documents • Baseline Tests for Accessible Electronic Documents—MS Word 2010 and MS 2013. 2015. https://www.section508.gov/content/build/create-accessible-documents Guidelines and Standards for Tactile Graphics (Web Version). Braille Authority of North America and the Canadian Braille Authority. 2012. http://www.brailleauthority.org/tg/web-manual/tgmanual.html Smithsonian Guidelines for Accessible Publication Design Smithsonian Institution. 2001. https://www.si.edu/Content/Accessibility/Publication- Guidelines.pdf SSA Guide: Producing Accessible Word and PDF Documents, Version 2.1 Social Security Administration, Accessibility Resource Center (SSA-ARC). 2010. https://www.ssa.gov/accessibility/files/The Social Security Administration Accessible Docum ent Authoring Guide 2.1.2.pdf 92 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 6.6 Guidance Documents—Historic Properties Common Questions about Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA) DOJ. Civil Rights Division. https://www.ada.gov/pubs/t2cia.txt Technical Preservation Brief 32:Making Historic Properties Accessible U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. Jester, Thomas C and Sharon C. Park. 1993. https://www.nps.gov/tps/how-to-preserve/briefs/32-accessibility.htm 6.7 Guidance Documents and Organizations—Emergency Preparedness Planning for People with Disabilities Emergency Management Institute (EMI) http://training.fema.gov/EMI/ Fact Sheet:Access and Functional Needs Support FEMA, US Department of Homeland Security, FEMA. 2018. https://www.fema.gov/media- Iibrary-data/1529082373683-6d3fdc61cee23005b6624ebbace52324/Access Function.pdf Interagency Coordinating Council on Emergency Preparedness and Individuals with Disabilities (ICC) http://www.disabilitypreparedness.gov/ Fire Prevention 52: Fire Safety for People with Disabilities National Park Service. https://www.nps.gov/articles/p52-fire-safety-for-people-with- disabilities.htm. Emergency Evacuation Planning Guide for People with Disabilities National Fire Protection Association. 2016. https://www.nfpa.org/-/media/Files/Public- Education/By-topic/Disabilities/EvacuationGuidePDF.ashx?la=en 6.8 Federal Laws and Standards 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design 2010. www.ada.gov/regs2010/2010ADAStandards/2010ADAstandards.htm Accessibility of State and Local Government Websites to People with Disabilities 2003. https://www.ada.gov/websites2 prnt.pdf ADA and ABA Accessibility Guidelines(ADAAG), (36 CFR Parts 1190 and 1191) Final Rule published in the Federal Register,July 23, 2004; as amended through May 7, 2014. https://www.access-board.gov/attachments/article/412/ada-aba.pdf ADA Best Practices Tool Kit for State and Local Governments 2008. https://www.ada.gov/pcatoolkit/abouttoolkit.htm 93 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 ADA Guide for Small Towns. 2000. http://www.ada.gov/smtown.htm ADA Information for Law Enforcement. 2008. http://www.ada.gov/policeinfo.htm ADA Requirements:Effective Communication 2014. https://www.ada.gov/effective-comm.pdf ADA Requirements:Service Animals 2010. https://www.ada.gov/service animals 2010.pdf ADA Requirements: Wheelchairs, Mobility Aids, and Other Power-Driven Mobility Devices 2014. https://www.ada.gov/opdmd.pdf An ADA Guide for Local Governments: Making Community Emergency Preparedness and Response Programs Accessible to People with Disabilities 2008. https://www.ada.gov/emergencyprepguide.htm Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA)Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities; Architectural Barriers Act(ABA)Accessibility Guidelines, Correction Final Rule published in the Federal Register, November 12, 2013. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2013/11/12/2013-26780/americans-with- disabilities-act-ada-accessibility-guidelines-for-buildings-and-facilities Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA) Title II Regulations: Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in State and Local Government Services 2010. https://www.ada.gov/regs2010/titlell 2010/titlell 2010 regulations.pdf Architectural Barriers Act(ABA) Pub. L. 90-480 (42 U.S.C. §§4151 et seq.). 1968. https://www.access-board.gov/the- board/laws/architectural-barriers-act-aba Architectural Barriers Act Accessibility Guidelines;Outdoor Developed Areas (AGODA) (36 CFR Part 1191) Final Rule published in the Federal Register, September 26, 2013. https://www.access- board.gov/attachments/article/1500/outdoor-rule.pdf Architectural Barriers Act Standards 2015. https://www.access-board.gov/attachments/article/1029/ABAstandards.pdf Commonly Asked Questions About the ADA and Law Enforcement. 2006. http://www.ada.gov/q&a law.htm 94 City of Tigard ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan–Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 Communicating with People Who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing:ADA Guide for Law Enforcement Officers. 2006. http://www.ada.gov/lawenfcomm.htm Frequently Asked Questions about Service Animals and the ADA 2015. https://www.ada.gov/regs2010/service animal ga.html Guidance on Use of the International Symbol of Accessibility Under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Architectural Barriers Act 2017. https://www.access-board.gov/attachments/article/1898/ISA-guidance.pdf Model Policy for Law Enforcement on Communicating with People Who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing. 2006. http://www.ada.gov/lawenfmodpolicy.htm Questions and Answers: The ADA and Hiring Police Officers. 1997. http://www.ada.gov/copsg7a.htm The ADA and City Governments: Common Problems. 2000. http://www.ada.gov/comprob.htm U.S. Access Board—Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board The full texts of federal laws and regulations that provide the guidelines for the design of accessible facilities and programs are available from the U.S. Access Board. Single copies of publications are available free and can be downloaded or ordered by completing a form available on the Access Board's website (http://www.access-board.gov/). In addition to regular print, publications are available in: large-print format, disk, audiocassette, and braille. U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Disability Rights Section The U.S. Department of Justice provides many free ADA materials including the Americans with Disability Act (ADA) text. Printed materials may be ordered by calling the ADA Information Line [(800) 514-0301 (Voice) or (800) 514-0383 (TTY)J. Publications are available in standard print as well as large-print format, audiotape, braille, and computer disk for people with disabilities. Documents, including the following publications, can also be downloaded from the DOJ website (http://www.ada.gov/). 6.9 State and Local Laws, Standards, and Ordinances Oregon Department of Human Services, Aging and People with Disabilities The mission of the Oregon Department of Human Services, Aging and People with Disabilities is to make it possible for seniors and people with disabilities to become independent, healthy and safe with opportunities for community living, employment, family support and services that promote independence, choice and dignity. http://www.oregon.gov/DHS/spwpd/Pages/index.aspx 95 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 State of Oregon The State of Oregon adopted design guidelines for accessible facilities, which can be found in the Oregon Structural Specialty Code Chapter 11 (OSSC). OSSC contains general building design and construction requirements relating to fire and life safety, structural safety, and access compliance. OSSC provides minimum standards to safeguard life or limb, health, property, and public welfare by regulating and controlling the design, construction, quality of materials, use and occupancy, location and maintenance of all buildings and structures and certain equipment.The Oregon Building Code Division follows the 2012 International Building Code (IBC) with amendments and provisions specific to the State of Oregon. Because building codes are updated every few years,the City should regularly review changes and update policies and procedures related to accessibility to ensure compliance with current code. • Chapter 11-Accessibility, Oregon Structural Specialty Code http://ecodes.biz/ecodes support/free resources/Oregon/14 Structural/PDFs/Chapter %2011%20-%20Access i b i l ity.p df Washington County Disability,Aging, and Veteran Services (DANS) This division of the Department of Health and Human Services provides programs and services to maintain and enhance the quality of life for Washington County seniors, veterans, and people with disabilities. DAVS offers support for family caregivers, assists with Medicare, connects individuals with limited income and resources to key benefits, and provides short- term intervention to help isolated seniors navigate and access services, among other programs. https://www.co.washington.or.us/hhs/days/ 96 City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 Appendix A: Public Outreach City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 This page intentionally left blank. CZ agenda ADA Self-Evaluation and Transtion Plan Focus Group - Meeting #1 Date 4/18/2018 Time 6:30 PM - 8:30 PM Participants ADA Focus Group 6:30 pm — 6:35 pm Introductions 6:35 pm - 6:50 pm Project Overview • Goals, Process, and Schedule • Role of the Focus Group 6:50 pm - 7:20 pm Strengths and Opportunities • What's working well? • Where are the greatest opportunities? 7:20 pm - 7:50 pm Challenges and Issues • What are the biggest challenges? • What are the biggest needs? 7:50 pm — 8:20 pm Planning Priorities • Prioritization Criteria Development • Federal Priorities for the right-of-way • ADA Barrier Removal Priorities Tigard 8:20 pm — 8:30 pm Next Steps For questions about accessibility or to request accommodations please contact Nadine Robinson at NadinePtigard-or.gov or 503-718-2481 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TTY). One week advance notice of the need for accommodations is requested. 4/18-6:30 pm to 8:30 pm:Focus Group Meeting#1 Attendees:Bob Cerbone, Lisa Detweiler, Natasha Lynch,Vicki March,Tristan Roberts, and Michael Stevens (not in attendance: Eileen Kovac and Patricia Rice),City staff Lori Faha and Nadine Robinson, and consultants Tim Gilbert, Heather Buczek, and Ed SanFilippo The first Focus Group of the ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan was held on April 18th from 6:30 pm to 8:30 pm at the Tigard Public Library. At this meeting,the focus group was oriented to the scope of work of the plan and the schedule. This was followed by a discussion of strengths,opportunities, issues, and challenges faces by individuals with disabilities in the community, and a discussion of planning priorities for the project. General Comments • The Tigard-Tualatin school district is fully inclusive(one of the few districts in the whole state) and this draws people to the community from all over the country. • Inclusive parks and playgrounds are important,especially for kids to interact with their peers on play equipment.The city has been responsive to requests accessibility modifications in the past. • Contacting the Access Board came up regarding general questions.The Access Board contact list can be found here:https://www.access-board.gov/contact-us Issues • Paths in parks,especially new paths, need to be accessible for individuals that use mobility devices, especially manual wheelchairs. Engineered wood fiber, dirt,and sand paths are consistently inaccessible. • A more streamlined process is needed regarding City engineering requirements for home improvement projects that have an impact on the right-of-way that requires ADA upgrades. • Better policies and planning are needed for special events,to ensure accessibility.Accessible parking on gravel is not an appropriate alternative solution during large events. • Hearing impairments create barriers at public meetings when adequate modifications are not provided.ASL interpreters are not appropriate when assistive listening devices are needed. Additionally,there have been instances of staff giving the impression that modification requests for hearing accommodations are unwelcome or inconvenient and this discourages civic participation. • Some streets without sidewalks have traffic that moves too fast for small children or people with disabilities.Sidewalks are the preferred solution,but alternatives such as painted lines along the roadway or other traffic barriers are alternate approaches when a sidewalk is infeasible. • Doors at park bathrooms are often heavy and have no automatic entry. Even when generally accessible, bathrooms can still have barriers. For example, bathrooms at parks do not have changing tables/benches for adults and large children,and single-sex bathrooms create challenges when an opposite-sex child or spouse has a disability. Family and/or single-user restrooms can help alleviate some of these challenges. • Garbage cans and basketball hoops on sidewalks are barriers for pedestrians using mobility devices. • More outreach is needed from the police about life safety identification for people with disabilities and information about fee waivers for alarm permits. Action Steps • City staff will provide names and addresses of newly developed parks in Tigard for Focus Group review and comment. • City staff will contact garbage collection companies regarding placement of garbage cans in the sidewalk. agenda ADA Self-Evaluation and Transtion Plan Focus Group - Meeting #2 Date 11/29/2018 Time 6:00 PM - 8:00 PM Participants ADA Focus Group 6:00 pm - 6:15 pm Project Status Report 6:15 pm - 6:30 pm Self-Evaluation Report 6:30 pm - 7:15 pm Summary of Facility Analysis Results • Buildings • Parks & Trails • Right-of-Way 7:15 pm - 7:50 pm Transition Plan Phasing • Priorities 7:50 pm - 8:00 pm Next Steps For questions about accessibility or to request accommodations please contact Nadine Robinson at NadinePtigard-or.gov or 503-718-2481 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TTY). One week advance notice of the need for accommodations is requested. 11/29/18-6:00 pm to 8:00 pm:Focus Group Meeting#2 Attendees: Natasha Lynch,Vicki March,Tristan Roberts (not in attendance: Eileen Kovac, Patricia Rice, Bob Cerbone, Lisa Detweiler, and Michael Stevens),City staff Lori Faha and Nadine Robinson, and consultants Tim Gilbert, Heather Buczek, and Ed SanFilippo The second Focus Group of the ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan was held on November 29th from 6:00 pm to 8:00 pm at Tigard City Hall. At this meeting,the focus group reviewed the self-evaluation summary report and the barrier analysis summary report. Participants also discussed priorities for phasing the transition plan. General Comments • Although the ADA legislation currently requires public entities to utilize text telephones (TTY)for people who are deaf or have hearing loss, new technologies are rapidly displacing this service in the general public. • Clarification was provided on the distinction between a reasonable accommodation and a reasonable modification. Issues • Gaps in the sidewalk network create safety concerns. For example,there is no sidewalk between the Tigard Library and City Hall,forcing pedestrians into the street. However, Hall Boulevard is owned by ODOT and the City has no jurisdiction to complete upgrades. • The automatic doors at the Tigard Library have a slow response time from the point when the push-button is deployed to the point when the door opens. • There are no accessible paths around the soccer fields at Cook Park. This limits opportunities for people with mobility devices to access the site as spectators. Priorities • East Butte Heritage Park is a high-use corridor for kids walking home from school. • Cook Park is a priority because everyone eventually uses it for something. • Geographic distribution is important to ensure accessibility of parks'close to home.' • Program diversity is important to ensure different types of activities are accessible. Examples provided included dog parks and community gardens. • Socioeconomic priorities should be considered to provide access for all abilities, but also to ensure better integration of people regardless of ability. Action Steps • City staff will address issues relating to the slow response time for the Library's automatic doors. • City staff will ensure focus group members are aware of opportunities for public testimony related to self-evaluation and transition plan project. 1 This page intentionally left blank. City of Tigard l ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 Appendix B: ADA Facility Barrier Summary Report City of Tigard I ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan—Public Review Draft 6.24.2019 This page intentionally left blank. City of Tigard I ADA Facility Barrier Summary Report 1.0 ADA BARRIERS IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT 1 1.1 Accessibility Standards 1 1.2 Facility Assessments—Parks,Trails,Buildings,and Public Parking 1 2.0 PARKS, TRAILS, AND BUILDINGS BARRIER SUMMARY 3 2.1 Parks 3 2.2 Trails 13 2.3 Buildings 17 2.4 Public Parking Facilities 23 2.5 Parks,Trails,Buildings,and Public Parking Barrier Removal Summary 27 November 21, 2018—pg. i City of Tigard I ADA Facility Barrier Summary Report List of Tables and Maps Tables • Table 1. ADA Accessibility Barrier Types at City Parks • Table 2. ADA Accessibility Barrier Types at City Trails • Table 3. ADA Accessibility Barrier Types at City Buildings • Table 4.Total Percentage of Park Barriers by Category • Table 5. Total Percentage of Trail Barriers by Category • Table 6. Total Percentage of Building Barriers by Category • Table 7. Total Percentage of Public Parking Barriers by Category Maps • Evaluated Parks • Evaluated Trails • Evaluated Buildings • Evaluated Public Parking Facilities November 21, 2018—pg. ii City of Tigard I ADA Facility Barrier Summary Report 1.0 ADA Barriers in the Built Environment The process of developing an American with Disabilities Act (ADA)Transition Plan includes the identification of access barriers within the built environment. The City of Tigard evaluated its parks, trails, buildings, and public parking facilities in 2018. 1.1 Accessibility Standards At the time of the evaluations, the ADA 2010 Standards, 2014 Oregon Structural Specialty Code (OSSC) Chapter 11 Accessibility, and 2015 Architectural Barriers Act (ABA) Standards for Outdoor Developed Areas were used to identify barriers at City facilities. Building codes and standards are revised every few years.The barrier evaluations conducted provide an assessment of current conditions as viewed by current code and provide a baseline for future barrier removal. 1.2 Facility Assessments — Parks, Trails, Buildings, and Public Parking The barrier assessments for parks, trails, buildings, and public parking facilities included all public interior and exterior elements of a site.The assessment identified physical barriers in each facility that limit accessibility and compared each facility to the 2010 ADA, 2014 OSSC, and the 2015 ABA. Evaluations were undertaken using a consultant team equipped with measuring devices, City facility data, and evaluation checklists. Diagrams and GIS maps of each site were annotated during the evaluation process and were included with the ADA Facility Assessment Report, available from the City. The elements included in the park evaluations are as follows: • Bathing Facilities • Fishing Piers and Platforms • Picnic Areas • Built-in Elements • Game and Sports Areas • Play Equipment Areas • Corridors/Aisles • Hazards • Ramps • Curb Ramps • Judicial Facilities • Rooms • Doors/Gates • Kitchens • Signs • Drinking Fountains • Library • Restrooms • Eating Areas • Other Features • Stairways • Elevators • Outdoor Constructed • Telephones • Exercise Machines and Features • View Areas Equipment • Parking Areas • Walks November 21, 2018—pg. 1 City of Tigard 1 ADA Facility Barrier Summary Report The identification of a feature that does not comply with the current access codes and standards does not necessarily mean that the feature must be modified. There are a variety of factors that must be considered to determine the final disposition of non-compliant features. Considerations include whether the feature complied with standards at the time of its construction, and for pre-ADA facilities, if similar programs, services, or activities are provided at other facilities. November 21, 2018—pg. 2 City of Tigard I ADA Facility Barrier Summary Report 2.0 Parks, Trails, and Buildings Barrier Summary The ADA evaluation included 21 parks, three trails, seven buildings, and two public parking facilities. This section describes each site with a summary of barriers to accessibility. 2.1 Parks The evaluation of parks included the following locations: • Ash Ave Dog Park • Jack Park • Bonita Park • Jim Griffith Memorial Skate Park • Bull Mountain Park • Liberty Park • Commercial Park • Main Street Park • Community Garden • Northview Park • Cook Park • Potso Dog Park • Dirksen Nature Park • Senn Park • East Butte Heritage Park • Summerlake Park • Elizabeth Price Park • Windmill Park • Englewood Park • Woodard Park • Fanno Creek Park Ash Ave Dog Park Park amenities include a shelter, benches, bicycle rack, drinking fountains, and exploration features for dogs. • Barriers identified include the following features: doors/gates, drinking fountains, hazards, outdoor constructed features, and other features. Bonita Park Park amenities include a play structure, basketball court, picnic shelter, grass play area, restroom, and drinking fountains. • Barriers identified include the following features: drinking fountains, game/sport areas, hazards, outdoor constructed features, parking, picnic areas, play equipment areas, stairways, walks, and other features. November 21, 2018—pg. 3 City of Tigard I ADA Facility Barrier Summary Report Bull Mountain Park Park amenities include trails, a picnic shelter, a nature play structure, and interpretive elements. • Barriers identified include the following features: drinking fountains, outdoor constructed features, picnic areas, walks, and other features. Commercial Park Park amenities include a bench, play structure, and trail. • Barriers identified include the following features: outdoor constructed features, play equipment areas, walks, and other features. Community Garden Amenities include garden plots, water spigots, and a tool/storage shed. • Barriers identified include the following features: built-in elements, doors/gates, rooms, and other features. Cook Park Park amenities include ball fields, soccer fields, picnic tables and shelters, BBQ grills, restrooms, drinking fountains, horseshoe pits, play structures, basketball and sand volleyball courts, a boat ramp and dock, fishing area, butterfly garden, trails, and natural areas. • Barriers identified include the following features: curb ramps, doors/gates, drinking fountains, eating areas, fishing piers and platforms, game/sport areas, hazards, outdoor constructed features, parking, picnic areas, play equipment areas, ramps, restrooms, walks, and other site features. Dirksen Nature Park Park amenities include ball fields, a natural area, trails, and outdoor fitness equipment. • Barriers identified include the following features: exercise machines/equipment, game/sport areas, view areas, walks, and other features. November 21, 2018—pg. 4 City of Tigard I ADA Facility Barrier Summary Report East Butte Heritage Park Park amenities include a picnic shelter and tables, benches, play structure, restroom, and walking paths. • Barriers identified include the following features: curb ramps, doors/gates, outdoor constructed features, picnic areas, play equipment areas, restrooms, stairways, walks, and other features. Elizabeth Price Park Park amenities include picnic tables, benches, a play structure, and an interpretive trail. • Barriers identified include the following features: doors/gates, drinking fountains, outdoor constructed features, picnic areas, play equipment areas, walks, and other features. Englewood Park Park amenities include play structures, basketball court, and trails. • Barriers identified include the following features: curb ramps, outdoor constructed features, picnic areas, play equipment areas, walks, and other features. Fanno Creek Park Park amenities include boardwalks, trails, and bridges that traverse Fanno Creek. • Barriers identified include the following features: outdoor constructed features, picnic areas, walks, and other features. Jack Park Park amenities include a playground,tot lot, walking paths, picnic tables, river rock climber, ball field, basketball court, drinking fountain, and a community garden. • Barriers identified include the following features: built-in elements, doors/gates, drinking fountains, game/sport areas, parking, picnic areas, play equipment areas, rooms, restrooms, walks, and other features. Jim Griffith Memorial Skate Park Amenities include two large flow bowls, a mini bowl, concrete dinosaur, rotating volcano top, and street features. • Barriers identified include the following features: doors/gates, drinking fountains, game/sport areas, parking, restrooms, walks, and other features. November 21, 2018—pg. 5 City of Tigard I ADA Facility Barrier Summary Report Liberty Park Park amenities include benches. • Barriers identified include the following features: outdoor constructed features and other features. Main Street Park Park amenities include benches. • Barriers identified include the following features: outdoor constructed features and walks. Northview Park Park amenities include a play structure and a picnic shelter. • Barriers identified include the following features: outdoor constructed features, picnic areas, play equipment areas, walks, and other features. Potso Dog Park Park amenities include separated areas for small and larger dogs, shaded picnic tables, and benches. • Barriers identified include the following features: doors/gates, outdoor constructed features, parking, picnic areas, walks, and other features. Senn Park Park amenities include a play structure and benches. • Barriers identified include the following features: outdoor constructed features, play equipment areas, and other features. Summerlake Park Park amenities include a dog park with shaded shelter, picnic shelter, ball fields,trails, BBQ grills, drinking fountains, horseshoe pits, play structures, tennis courts, basketball courts, picnic tables, benches, restrooms, and a rhododendron garden. • Barriers identified include the following features: doors/gates, drinking fountains, game/sport areas, outdoor constructed features, parking, picnic areas, play equipment areas, restrooms, walks, and other features. Windmill Park This park does not currently have amenities. No barriers were identified. November 21, 2018—pg. 6 City of Tigard 1 ADA Facility Barrier Summary Report Woodard Park Park amenities include play structures, a covered shelter, drinking fountain, and trails. • Barriers identified include the following features: drinking fountains, outdoor constructed features, parking, picnic areas, play equipment areas, walks, and other features. November 21, 2018—pg. 7 City of Tigard I ADA Facility Barrier Summary Report This page intentionally left blank. November 21, 2018—pg. 8 i 1 i j 1 ,, i i- i • ,'•.-i i i Senn Park iin ., Y- �• ' Englew � - i i Park" i i .i i i I.,-1 ,, Ill- �1 I TIGARD Summerlake GO i Park Dirksen i Tigard ADA Self-Evaluation&Transition Plan Nature i Park i Evaluated Parks Commercial Park Windmill Park i - Liberty Park i ,Northview ! i i(. Park i Context s' i ,--i Jack Woodard Park -Ash Ave.Dog Park i 0 i ii Park / i Parks ---_ -T---1:7:,-;_-.1-4:-...,---,- 1 i i Main St.Park i _ Potso Dog Park 1 = � �' i City Limits Community Garden . i i i Fanno •��� i 1 Li`}1-z-:_ i i i ',.._•_i Creek Park Jim Griffith j \-' Memorial i ! - Bull Mountain Park Skate Park j • ! 99W) i — i ,`' -u-_.r. —i Bonita Park i j i i (1-7!--' i i t East Butte '� i ! i !;- `1'•_,-, Elizabeth Price Park Heritage l ! i i i !:__ Park i i r i i i i jil i i 'L1i i,.:, i i i I i % i -1 >' --.-.-, I k''.' / I , / 1 i i ji ! Cook Park [, _ i 1pJ 8.22.2018 e iiIIIME_ Miles 0 0.25 0.5 This page intentionally left blank. City of Tigard I ADA Facility Barrier Summary Report Table 1.ADA Accessibility Barrier Types at City Parks U, U VI * Cit f° * a) 4.0 ( tA O > ao GJ in l= v v COLk.o r3 11- - a O LE E E 0 40 c -0 an O a o w vi i C in U w v i O i Location Name °o c cis u CD o o s 0 ci x a a a a C7 a oc CZ O Ash Ave Dog Park • • • • • Bonita Park • • • • • • • • Bull Mountain Park • ICIIM- • • Commercial Park • • • • Community Garden • • • Cook Park • • • • • • • • • • Dirksen Nature Park • • • • East Butte Heritage Park • • • • • • • Elizabeth Price Park • • • • • • • Englewood Park • • • • • Fanno Creek Park • • • • Jack Park • • • • • • • • • Jim Griffith Memorial Skate Park • • • • • • • Liberty Park • • Main Street Park • _- • Northview Park • • • • • Potso Dog Park • • • • -MEIN!_ • Senn Park • • • Summerlake Park • • • • • • • • • November 21, 2018—pg. 11 City of Tigard I ADA Facility Barrier Summary Report 0 0 * C f° CO * v v co '1F L 4+ U = u Q V) C in cu cu Q 0 c rte+ o i EO. p 0. E 06 W — p. N i.e' a) 0 to vi `� W as •3 {n E o W O -2 C V W CU i OL L O O CD N 4'' •tJ f0 (p 0 0 Location Name p° p I a a a E w a cc cc O Windmill Park Woodard Park • • • • • • • *Paths of travel encompass curb ramps, ramps, stairways, walks, etc. **Program specific barriers include features that are typically unique to certain facilities, such as exercise machines and equipment, fishing piers and platforms, outdoor constructed features, and view areas. November 21, 2018—pg. 12 City of Tigard I ADA Facility Barrier Summary Report 2.2 Trails The evaluation of trails included the following locations: • Englewood East/N Dakota to Tigard Trail • Fanno Creek Trail (Library) • Pathfinder-Genesis Trail Englewood East/Al Dakota to Tigard Trail This approximately half-mile trail connects the southeast corner of Englewood Park with the northeast corner of Dirksen Nature Park. • Barriers identified include the following features: walks and other features. Fanno Creek Trail(Library) This approximately 1000-foot portion of the Fanno Creek Trail runs directly behind the library. • Barriers identified include the following features: picnic areas, view areas, walks, and other features. Pathfinder-Genesis Trail This approximately half-mile trail runs northeast from SW 115th Avenue along the creek and across SW Walnut Street into Woodard Park. • Barriers identified include the following features: stairways, walks, and other features. Table 2. ADA Accessibility Barrier Types at City Trails Paths of Picnic/Eating View Location Name Travel* Areas Areas Other Englewood East/N Dakota to Tigard Trail • • Fanno Creek Trail (Library) • • • • Pathfinder-Genesis Trail • • *Paths of travel encompass curb ramps, ramps, stairways, walks, etc. November 21, 2018—pg. 13 City of Tigard I ADA Facility Barrier Summary Report This page intentionally left blank. November 21, 2018—pg. 14 / I - Englewood East/ • 1111 N.Dakota to Tigard Trail !-i 0 NI . ® I - - _ TIGARD CRS Tigard ADA Self-Evaluation &Transition Plan i'l Evaluated Trails Context Trails I City Limits (99Wi (217i 2Pathfinder-Genesis Trail —Fanno Creek Trail Unmarked Trail '' 8.22.201P ssw ':Miles e 0 0.25 0.5 This page intentionally left blank. City of Tigard I ADA Facility Barrier Summary Report 2.3 Buildings The evaluations included the following buildings: • Civic Center: City Hall, Permit Center, • Ferguson Building Police, and Exterior • Library • Dirksen Nature Park Educational Building • Public Works Building • Fanno Creek House • Senior Center Civic Center:City Hall, Permit Center, Police, and Exterior This facility is a complex of three buildings containing most of the City's departments and services, including the municipal court, police, billing, the permit center, council chambers, and human resources. It is located at 13125 SW Hall Boulevard. • Barriers identified include the following features: bathing facilities, built-in elements, curb ramps, doors/gates, drinking fountains, hazards,judicial facility features, other features, outdoor constructed features, parking, restrooms, rooms, signs, telephones, and walks. Dirksen Nature Park Educational Building This facility at the edge of Dirksen Nature Park offers a meeting room and a classroom suitable for groups up to 25 people. It is located at 11130 SW Tigard Street. • Barriers identified include the following features: corridors/aisles, doors/gates, hazards, kitchens, parking, picnic areas, ramps, restrooms, rooms, stairways, and walks. Fanno Creek House This facility in Fanno Creek Park is situated on a 1.6-acre property and can be reserved for public and private events. It is located at 13335 SW Hall Boulevard. • Barriers identified include the following features: doors/gates, hazards, kitchen, parking, ramps, restrooms, rooms, stairways, walks, and other features. Ferguson Building This facility is currently leased by Ferguson Plumbing. It located at 9110 SW Burnham Street. • Barriers identified include the following features: built-in elements, doors/gates, drinking fountains, hazards, parking, restrooms, rooms, signs, stairways, and walks. November 21, 2018—pg. 17 City of Tigard I ADA Facility Barrier Summary Report Library This facility includes book drops, a Children's Room, public computers, a reading room, three quiet study rooms, and a separate Young Adult area. It is located at 13500 SW Hall Boulevard. • Barriers identified include the following features: built-in elements, corridors/aisles, curb ramps, doors/gates, drinking fountains, eating areas, elevators, hazards, library features, parking, ramps, restrooms, rooms, signs, stairways, walks, and other features. Public Works Building This facility contains the divisions of the Public Works department. It is located at 8777 SW Burnham Street. • Barriers identified include the following features: curb ramps, doors/gates, drinking fountains, hazards, kitchens, parking, restrooms, walks, and other features. Senior Center This facility offers events, a dining room, spaces for activities and classes, and a gift store, and serves as the local hub for a meals on wheels program. It is located at 8815 SW Omara. • Barriers identified include the following features: curb ramps, doors/gates, drinking fountains, eating areas, elevators, hazards, parking, ramps, restrooms, rooms, signs, stairways, walks, and other features. November 21, 2018—pg. 18 IJ r-j *1 _ !PI - TIGARD Dirksen Nature Park Educational Building • Tigard ADA Self-Evaluation&Transition Plan Evaluated Buildings Context SW Walnut St I ® I • Building Ferguson Building ' ' City Limits •Public Works Building Civic Center-Police Station 99WJ • Civic Center-Permit Center Civic Center-City Hall— • •" Fanno Creek House Senior Center• • •Library — I _ I I R.13.201R iXi I I j 1 I This page intentionally left blank. City of Tigard I ADA Facility Barrier Summary Report Table 3.ADA Accessibility Barrier Types at City Buildings N a) * C U * 3 U CO L * 1.11 C .n a) C N V C 2 3 C > a) a)cu o o coL RI as U f- N `n 0 qo i H L H E o W la) C i to L - (O L 0 = O CU LO u, L p C > coN Location Name c L u o o 0 a °o ago CU_ Ci w = O U. 0.. 00cc tx in O Civic Center:City Hall • • • • • Civic Center: Exterior --__ • • • Civic Center: Permit Center • • _—_ • • • • Civic Center: Police • • • __— • • • • • Dirksen Nature Park Educational Building • • • • • • • Fanno Creek House • • • • • • • • Ferguson Building • • • • • • • • Library • • • • • • • • • • • Public Works Building • • • • • • • • Senior Center • • • • • • • • • • *Paths of travel encompass corridors/aisles, curb ramps, ramps, stairways, walks, etc. **Program specific barriers include features that are typically unique to certain facilities, such as bathing facilities, eating areas, judicial facilities, kitchens, libraries, picnic areas, and telephones. November 21, 2018—pg. 21 City of Tigard l ADA Facility Barrier Summary Report This page intentionally left blank. November 21, 2018—pg. 22 City of Tigard I ADA Facility Barrier Summary Report 2.4 Public Parking Facilities The evaluations included the following public parking facilities: • SW Main at SW Burnham • SW Main at SW Tigard SW Main at SW Burnham This parking facility has approximately 20 spaces, with one accessible parking space. • Barriers identified include the following features: parking. SW Main at SW Tigard This parking facility has approximately 14 spaces, with one accessible parking space. • Barriers identified include the following features: parking. November 21, 2018—pg. 23 City of Tigard 1 ADA Facility Barrier Summary Report This page intentionally left blank. November 21, 2018—pg. 24 r � SW Main at SW Tigard 11111111,11/,,, TIGARD Tigard ADA Self-Evaluation&Transition Plan Evaluated Public Parking Facilities Context Parking Lot a\nS SW Main at SW Burnham G 8.13.2018 sr e mmENE— Feet 0 50 100 This page intentionally left blank. City of Tigard I ADA Facility Barrier Summary Report 2.5 Parks, Trails, Buildings, and Public Parking Barrier Removal Summary Accessibility barriers are prioritized in a process referenced in the ADA title II regulations. The principle is to ensure that basic access is provided, access to activities is provided, amenities are accessible, and alternatives to architectural modifications are allowed when appropriate. Translating these categories into action plans must be accomplished using a programmatic approach.The site priorities are divided into four categories: • Category 1: barrier removal items that provide accessibility at the main entrance of a facility or improve a path of travel to the portion of the facility where program activities take place (e.g., parking, walks, ramps, stairs, doors, etc.). • Category 2: barrier removal items that improve or enhance access to program use areas (e.g., transaction counters, conference rooms, public offices, restrooms, etc.). • Category 3: barrier removal items that improve access to amenities serving program areas (e.g., drinking fountains, telephones, site furnishings, vending machines). • Category 4: areas or features not required to be modified for accessibility(no public programs located in this area, or duplicate features). A draft categorization was applied to each identified barrier at Tigard parks, trails, buildings, and public parking. Some barriers will require further evaluation by City staff for programmatic solutions. These barriers have been assigned two category values (i.e. "2 or 4"), indicating the barrier will need to be assigned one of the values but not both.The categories by site are summarized in the tables on the pages that follow. The percentages of each category in the tables are a proportion of the total number of barriers at each individual site. November 21, 2018—pg. 27 City of Tigard I ADA Facility Barrier Summary Report Table 4.Total Percentage of Park Barriers by Category Category Location Name 1 2 3 4 2 or 4 Ash Ave Dog Park 27% 13% 20% 0% 40% Bonita Park 6% 59% 24% 0% 12% Bull Mountain Park 0% 69% 3% 0% 29% Commercial Park 0% 85% 0% 0% 15% Community Garden 22% 78% 0% 0% 0% Cook Park 33% 48% 3% 0% 15% Dirksen Nature Park 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% East Butte Heritage Park 3% 82% 0% 0% 15% Elizabeth Price Park 26% 52% 9% 0% 13% Englewood Park 13% 79% 0% 0% 8% Fanno Creek Park 0% 91% 0% 0% 9% Jack Park 2% 92% 3% 0% 3% Jim Griffith Memorial Skate Park 26% 68% 5% 0% 0% Liberty Park 0% 50% 0% 0% 50% Main Street Park 0% 50% 0% 0% 50% Northview Park 0% 67% 0% 0% 33% Potso Dog Park 11% 70% 0% 0% 20% Senn Park 0% 83% 0% 0% 17% Summerlake Park 3% 79% 2% 0% 17% Windmill Park 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% Woodard Park 9% 66% 4% 0% 21% November 21, 2018—pg. 28 City of Tigard I ADA Facility Barrier Summary Report Table 5.Total Percentage of Trail Barriers by Category Category Location Name 1 2 3 4 2 or 4 Englewood East/N Dakota to Tigard Trail 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% Fanno Creek Trail (Library) 0% 93% 0% 0% 7% Pathfinder-Genesis Trail 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% Table 6. Total Percentage of Building Barriers by Category Category Location Name 1 2 3 4 2 or 4 Civic Center: City Hall 11% 89% 0% 0% 0% Civic Center: Exterior 68% 26% 0% 0% 6% Civic Center: Permit Center 4% 91% 4% 0% 0% Civic Center: Police 8% 90% 2% 0% 0% Dirksen Nature Park Educational Building 44% 52% 0% 0% 4% Fanno Creek House 35% 65% 0% 0% 0% Ferguson Building 20% 77% 3% 0% 0% Library 17% 78% 3% 0% 2% Public Works Building 31% 66% 3% 0% 0% Senior Center 21% 66% 1% 0% 12% Table 7. Total Percentage of Public Parking Barriers by Category Category Location Name 1 2 3 4 2 or 4 Public Lot(SW Main at SW Burnham) 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% Public Lot(SW Main at SW Tigard) 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% November 21, 2018—pg. 29 City of Tigard I ADA Facility Barrier Summary Report This page intentionally left blank. November 21, 2018—pg. 30 1 .., . ,IIIIIIII w . „.<w., ,ri . . � . �,_ i Y tea ; ,,..._ , , W .t • ,;,rd Respect and Care I Do the Rig, • * 6 Americans with Disabilities Act Self-evaluation and Transition Plan City of Tigard What is the ADA? • A civil rights statute that protects Americans with disabilities from discrimination. • Signed into law in 1990 and updated in 2010. • Title II of the ADA requires public entities to complete a self-evaluation and develop a transition plan to ensure programs and facilities meet accessibility standards. City of Tigard Plan Background • Tigard developed a transition plan in 1993. • Parts of the self-evaluation and transition plan were updated in 1999/2000. • This is the first comprehensive evaluation of city programs, services, activities and city facilities for accessibility compliance since the 1993 plan. City of Tigard Self-Evaluation The self-evaluation process included: • Evaluating services, policies, and practices and identifying the modifications that need to be made to ensure programmatic accessibility. • Identifying physical obstacles that limit the accessibility of facilities for individuals with disabilities. • Involving people with disabilities in identifying, reviewing and providing input into the plan. City of Tigard Transition Plan The data collected in the evaluation of city facilities is reflected in the city's transition plan. It includes: • a list of barriers that limit the accessibility of city programs, activities, or services to individuals with disabilities, • a detailed outline of feasible methods to remove the barriers and make the facilities accessible, • a schedule for removing the barriers, and • the name of the individual responsible for the plan's implementation. City of Tigard Elements of Programs, Services and Activities Evaluated " { . .. ` " °` . i ," fx • Accessible & adaptable ..• i, 4 - . •ta t ..•Nf • 'el 1 k. . , .* equipment, . , jl ; `: • Public meetings, y ,,,.;.. . ' ' ,.. . ...t. : , • Program participation, .:It Y. - l .* i ,d,,, a • Special events, . _ • Notice requirements, - - -4 _ , • Printed information, - • Communications, Fanno Creek House . Customer service, and • Staff training. City of Tigard Building Elements Evaluated • Built-in elements a • Doors/gates • Drinking fountains Diboll .MA T`�AR° • Washrooms • Elevators prom=Building • Signage C -hike Statrea, Caibr ��...,.a„N.--.._ Can.•.... SOfike Ce,■,. = . , City of Tigard • . Park & Trail Elements Evaluated , • Picnic areas , . Senn Park i a • Outdoor constructed 'ItkA TIGARD features • Play equipment areas _.--- ,, ;r., -I • Restrooms Win St Park famoralt,Gard= 7_,-,, ) Fame • Drinking fountains _ B.Mourflaw Parl, Skate Para Evaluated Parks • Parking areas C ty c t Tigard ADA Se'Evaluation&Pans,t on Plan • Signage - -, - . EN Parka ,- --- _ City BoUndaq • Paths of travel — .---, paved trails and_= 0 ..... sidewalks City of Tigard Priorities for Barrier Removal for Parks, Trails, Buildings and Public Parking Areas • Level of use by the public • Program uniqueness • Identified accessibility needs • Geographic distribution • Public gathering and meeting spaces and • Facilities where services are provided to exercise citizen rights or responsibilities. City of Tigard City-owned Rights-of-Way Elements Evaluated • Curb ramp: t: a ` r. • condition •,° • ~� • counter and/or cross slope -^' PO i • detectable warning ° ' '` ° °• s""°"• `gx , r y. i ISS .• *O • _...._ -JNA �^ 1. p • receiving ramp , 4.�, •3,,.�- °M^• 44. • rl 16i r ..1., • •• A.• ` • • Pedestrian access routes: VIP .. . _ • • • • :.• k jai"�r•' ..�• '' • �s s • sidewalks Cf + a _ 3V4 • ,,• t. if • crosswalks - " , • railroad crossings ,,i ,, • hazards :F 1 •. itnnonn • Pedestrian signalsCountry /', ,,,.,r.:, Rights-of-Way progress map City of Tigard Priorities for Rights-of-Way Barrier Removal Table 3-5:Curb Ramp Geospatial Proximity Priority Matrix A B C D E F Location of Location Serving Location Serving Location Serving Citizen Complaint Priorities Priority Government Location Serving High-Use Commercial Location Serving or Request(ADA (Category) Description Offices&Public Transportation Pedestrian Districts, Other Areas Title II Program Facilities Corridor Employers Access) See 1 Category 1 Al Bl Cl Dl i El Fl Description High Priority-- — See I 2 Category 2 A2 B2 C2 D2 E2 F2 Description l See 3 Category 3 A3 B3 C3 D3 E3 c3 Description Medium Priority , I See 4 Category 4 A4 B4 C4 D4 E4 P4 Description Low Priority - No 5 deficiencies A5 B5 C5 D5 E5 F5 identified *The priorities listed under columns B,C, E,and F are specified under title II 28 CFR Section 35.150(d). City of Tigard Moving the Plan Forward By November 2019 • Incorporate plan feedback from Tigard City Council and the public. • Bring the final plan to the Mayor and Council for adoption. Next 1 - 3 years: • Review all barriers and address those barriers that can be resolved through programmatic modifications and maintenance tasks. • Develop an ADA barrier removal tracking tool to track progress on the removal of barriers. • Develop a training plan to keep staff up-to-date on the ADA . • Create an internal ADA committee and define responsibilities. • Develop a process for annual review of the plan by the public. City of Tigard 15-year Plan • Community will be provided an opportunity to comment on the plan and make suggestions for barrier removal. • The internal ADA committee will provide an annual report to Tigard City Council. • The annual report will be posted on the city's website. • Staff training will provided and the training plan updated. • Budget requests will identify barrier work that, with funding approval, will be completed the next fiscal year. AIS-3927 S. Workshop Meeting Meeting Date: 08/20/2019 Length (in minutes): 30 Minutes Agenda Title: Receive Quarterly Capital Improvement Plan Update Prepared For: Lori Faha, Public Works Submitted By: Lori Faha, Public Works Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: Council Workshop Mtg. Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Briefing and update on the status of Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) projects underway. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST No action is requested; the purpose of this item is to brief council. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) establishes Tigard's budget and timeline for improvements to city owned and operated public infrastructure over a 6-year period. A CIP project improves or adds value to the city's infrastructure, typically costs $50,000 or more, and has a useful life or extends the useful life of infrastructure for 5 years or more. Public facility systems addressed by the CIP include streets, parks, sanitary sewers, stormwater and domestic water in addition to public buildings and facilities. In most cases, CIP projects are implemented with oversight from the city's Engineering Division. City Engineer Lori Faha will provide a summary report to council,including the status of active projects during this briefing. The attached file will be shown as a PowerPoint presentation at the meeting. Copies of individual project status reports for active CIP projects will be delivered to council in the August 15, 2019 City Council Newsletter packet. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Not applicable. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS The Fiscal Year 2018-19 CIP was adopted on June 26, 2018. The Fiscal Year 2019-20 CIP was adopted on June 11, 2019. DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION The last council CIP briefing was on March 19, 2019. Attachments CIP Update Aug 2019 CITY OF TIGARD Respect and Care I Do the Right Thing I Get it Done 111 e , TIGARD CapitalImprovement Project Update l FY 2018-19 — Fiscal Year End Report Tigard City Council Meeting I August 20, 2019 CITY OF TIGARD Summary of FY19 CIP By the Numbers... 0' 34 CIP Projects Completed in FY19 21 Grants/Outside Funding Sources / 23+ OP Projects Underway in FY19 Include Bike/Pedestrian Improvements (; I I' 1 O 1 " 'I' I ( j .\ R I) Project Status O On Target 0 Minor Issues 0 Major Issues 1 Parks :� , ,, � a Streets j- - } W 1---s 1..: f 04 ► WaterIraqi :,::gill r ► Sanitary Sewer ""' ;A 0. 1 Stormwater �4w• �e i x i�" S r 94 p ► Facilities sr f ,,: to + '„ "cr " F e CITY OF TIGARD Status of Parks Projects PROJECT NOTES BUDGET SCHEDULE Fanno Creek Remeander Co plete Dirksen Nature Park Successful Camas Festival—April 27 • Oak Savannah Restoration ! Cattle grazing completed • • • Nature Play Area Complete • • Interpretive Shelter and Complete • Restroom Tigard Street Heritage Trail Construction contract awarded CITY OF TIGARD Status of Parks Projects PROJECT NOTES BUDGET SCHEDULE Fanno Creek Trail—RFFA Grant Design underway, scope adjustments keeping 1111 project on budget Fanno Creek Trail/Tiedeman Complete • Resurfacing courts, replacing park signs, Parks Major Maintenance Potso paving, Jack Park trail evaluation, Cook : • • Park creek erosion evaluation irri ation system upgrades— rojects comp e Parks Master Plan Hiring consultant • Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Received Metro grant, consultant work • Study Bonita—Tualatin River 1 starting CITY O F T I G .\ R I) Status of Streets Projects PROJECT NOTES BUDGET SCHEDULE Pavement Management FY19 Program Complete as Planned Program Multiple projects—sidewalk/path gap filling, Pedestrian and Cyclist crosswalk improvements, bike/ped Connections Program counts,"Your Speed Is" signs, pilot safety_ projects, grant matching funds—5 prg completed Upper Boones Ferry/ Durham New signal controllers & coordinated timing • Adaptive Signals implemented, adaptive software and High School crosswalk change next, ODOT delays Commercial Street Sidewalk Construction starting, reduced scope due to • (Main to Lincoln) high costs, will require Q1 budget adjustment Hunziker Industrial Core/Wall St Complete • • Wall St/Tech Center Drive IGA approved for RFFA grant, design • • Connection underway CITY OF TIGARD Status of Streets Projects PROJECT NOTES BUDGET SCHEDULE Roy Rogers Road County lead, construction underway • • North Dakota Street Bridge Selected for ODOT grant, scoping for IGA and Replacement design RFP, additional budget added in FY20 72nd Avenue/Tigard Triangle Gathered public input on priorities, draft • Study preferred option development underway 121st Ave (Whistlers Lane— County lead through MSTIP program, design • 0 Tippitt)sidewalks, bike lanes underway, Open House September Tiedeman Ave Complete Street Future traffic study completed, focus initially • II on sidewalk improvements at Tigard St Trail Fees negotiation with consultant team Main Street Phase 2 underway, costs higher than expected • Traffic Safety Action Plan New project, funded by ODOT, reviewing crash trends for ways to improve safety • • CITY OF TIGARD Status of Water Projects PROJECT NOTES BUDGET SCHEDULE Red Rock Creek Waterline Work is being phased to coordinate with • . Relocation 1 other projects, design and construction underway Canterbury Pump Station Consultant analysis complete, pump station • • rehab work next Underway, system model developed, Water Master Plan coordinating with Lake Oswego, identifying • future needs and options Fonner St/121st Ave Valve & Design underway, in coordination with 121st • • Piping Improvements Ave project Water Rate & SDC Study Not started, will follow master plan • CITY OF TIGARD Status of Sanitary Sewer Projects PROJECT NOTES BUDGET SCHEDULE East Fork Derry Dell Creek Design & permitting underway for stream II • restoration & sanitary sewer protection Fanno Creek Sanitary Siphon Final design complete, construction delayed 40 Repair to spring/summer 2020 due to permitting and easement acquisition issues Sanitary Sewer Major Repairing/lining sewers — 1 project & • ! Maintenance multiple spot "link" repairs complete CITY OF TIGARD Status of Stormwater Projects PROJECT NOTES BUDGET SCHEDULE Fanno Creek Slope Stabilization I • —Arthur Court Construction underway 124th Avenue/Ann Court Culvert Construction underway Replacement Stormwater Rate/Funding Study Work started • Kruger Creek Predesign Complete • • Bridgeport Stormline Replace Complete • • Frewing Stormline Replace Design underway • • Water Quality Facility Rehab Condition assessments for facilities • • Program underway, developing priorities, public works staff completed several rehab projects Stormwater Major Maintenance Multiple pipe and stream system repairs—7 • • projects completed CITY OF TIG ARD Status of Other Projects PROJECT NOTES BUDGET SCHEDULE Americans with Disabilities Act Public Review of Draft Plan underway Transition Plan • Public Works Facility and Yard Chartering underway for new facility site(s) • • (planning) and determining how to fund ( ; [ I ' O ! "1' I ( :A R lD New CIP Projects Starting in FY20 • Fanno Creek Trail at Scholls Ferry Road • Cach Reservoir • Aquifer Storage & Recovery Wells Rehabilitation • Dirksen Path and Boardwalk • Transportation System Plan Update • Universal Plaza • Tigard Triangle Stormwater Implementation Plan • Water System SDC's, Rates Study • Frewing Street Sidewalk (CDBG grant) CITY OF TIGARD Pavement Management Program Durham Road ,:44...„, ,,,. . ,. ,..r. ..,... ss: : , .. -,..,. f ',. • .. .4 ' ; , , `.. , . +4•:i '• '*--.. . - - f 71 i"`' �,` , x - , .Y+IWk . ...,... ..e. a .• ..x.: x :.. w ... CIIY OF 'l 1 G A R 1) Pavement Management Program Durham Road , ‘4,,,,,,---- 4... ....,.. _. . ,,, . ., ,,,,,,.....,,.7,6,,--4Ls.4,,,,, - ,,. ' '' ' . .. 44,011111 . ' "` ,. ,,� - �^ $CCI, "r 3 ,. u, -.--z i-. a » .. r� r y r' • � � r � C l '1' 1 0L. '1' 1 G ARD Fanno Creek Bank Stabilization T ' ;_ END OF(N)TRAIL/ a CONSTRUCTION LIMIT r gp., , ,.,4 ' .y . %" (I I) IRAIL _ 1( 550 FT LEtIGTH AT CL \_.,',,,t ' ' "" L � 6600 SQ. FT ENDrI) r x N OF t TRAIL' . p . . - .410,,-, , +'t car. '. ' () CONSTRUCT' 'I LIMIT •S xi43 ,- .4 d eek * ' t' 41 :, ECTRAREA. r,, •ROJ r x- "0 ANNO C EEK SLOPE *► ' . ABILIZATION AT SW z 'e. . �;;T„, .tie'; 4 RTHUR CT . �, _ 41 n A "`_ ,„$:' `.' _•. .,i.4•�..__ ��J CITY OF '1' 1 G A R D Fanno Creek Bank Stabilization .. .. , „it..„, ... . ,... ,....„, .. ... ,... • •i ,qy i. «1 {r I I. - , -1-�` 7 n+4 V‘„,,..,,,AP,' Ni,-, a f -.**-,i''`. *�a,`a ,� amu!"' '�$ ' „4,...,,.. ,, ,„. t,„... ,74, '4-1,,,,,,,,,V. x. #fiP A, ate ! + .. „t_,.y. y 4�i,ti� 3, I '”' ',e 4 >Y• y r - _ AIS-3914 6. Workshop Meeting Meeting Date: 08/20/2019 Length (in minutes): 45 Minutes Agenda Title: Land Use Training Prepared For: Shelby Rihala, City Management Submitted By: Kelly Burgoyne, Central Services Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: Council Workshop Mtg. Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Receive land use legal issues presentation from city attorney. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST None, for discussion only. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY Oregon's land use system can be substantively and procedurally complex. This presentation is designed to be a refresher of some of the procedural legal issues that may arise in the course of a contested land use case and Council's options for responding. OTHER ALTERNATIVES COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION None. 5 6 g W _ 0 m 41 rad? tao Land Legal City Attorney Shelby Rihala School buses ! iii,..,...w 1 ` ,M , G - , iiii,....,„ rr , y , or it „,f;i. 0 .I. , lifo t kitir' '''' 1 , , r mos �.,. , ifti 06 . /:-. •.',, 6;‘9. / Agic 1-k- n 1 e,4\ ..0... ennyS t°SW Kenny S t' 7.1......4,4, 1- 4/ x-, •-• , c> en 8 .., 42 ) --- trii I , 164, & 4,9 ()\-\et( ‘).'44 - •a 9:: '('1.:\.:::.):".44V3:2:2:111 N w ::15 ::::::: '6-6->''.> "'IN• ifil_10‘ I afss .,•:',/ / \`(1.` - ' 7 -7, • \ .N. i 1°) , 1 ...... i 18 41 C -4 (71 ($) 1 fc3 rj''; *S W Fernbrook St $'37,,, 0, /6c,., 4 18 551 lfQ , A, vos / -IP v 16:411 0 0) en. rh ./11. 1 ''T. / ',,,'' ' 6',1 ,,,. . \ a) ' > crs, '"' -0 —4, iZt / 0 CD 18 55 8 61^ .0 18521 — 1851R - 1H4 35 \ /4) // .5) , 1 18621 0 1 86 30 '61?5, 1)(1? 0 -1._„ 1543 , 0 Lu 18 65 1 1866 0 9 185 55 18455 71' Taking Public Testimony • Public hearing • Continue hearing (written evidence) • Any party may request; at least 7 days • Rebuttal (written response) • Any party may request if new evidence submitted; at least 7 days • Final written argument • Unless waived by applicant, City must allow at least 7 days J,\11 F r,_ ( NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ears C. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMISSION P u b I i c IJotice i Date of Notice:February 8,2019 On March 4.2019 at 700 p.m.,the City of Lake Oswego modify these time limits,however,depending on the Development Review Commission will hold a public circumstances In order to be considered and become heanng in the Council Chambers at City Hall,380"A" part of the record,written comments or testenony must Avenue,Lake Oswego,Oregon to consider the following be submitted to the Development Review Commission development application at the beano,or must be received Iso noon on the date • Code requirements File No.: LU 18-0063 of the beans at the foiiowng address Applicant:Lake Oswego School District Punning&Building Services Dept Location of property 6333 Lakeview Boulevard City of Lake Oswego Tat Map/Lot 21E18CC03200 P 0 Bos 369 • Challenges to improper notice380"A"Avenue Nxwe of Application and Use or Uses which court be Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Authorized:The applicant is requesting approval of Development Review and Conditional Use Permits,a How To Obtain further Information: The applicable • Prejudiced subetantiaI right to full Mmor Variance to fence height,and removal of a tree approval criteria and all evidence relied on by the for a transportation depot use(school district bus applicant are available for review at the above address yard/maintenance facility)that includes exterior The City Staff Report will be available ten days prior to and fair hearing modifications to an existing building and a parting;cit expansion the date of the herIng at the above address and online at www lakeosweeo rte,(type LU 1B-0063 in the search Applicable Approval Criteria: Please see attached in box at the top of the screen).Copies of all of these • How to cure? Conduct of the Nearing:The Chair will open the public documentsoassigned may beo thisobtaippd at tort.The Cityr staff • fie and describe the hearing person Planner ae 503-67S-3732, 03-67 d Icon and emirs heaving procedure,and staff Associate phone SD3-6753732. intik will present its report.The Chair will then open the efranstedlgilakeoswe,to.city hearing for public testimony Testimony begins with the applicant,followed by persons in favor of the NOTE:failure to rase an issue in a hearme,In person application,persons opposed to the application, or by letter•accompanied by statements or evidence persons who are neutral on the application,and sufficient to afford the Development Review concludes with rebuttal by the applicant.Before closing Commission an opportunity to respond to the issue the hearing,the Chair will ask whether any person who precludes appeal to the City Council and the Oregon testified desires a continuance to submit new evidence Land Use Board of Appeals(LURA)based on that issue. or testimony If no continuance is requested,the Chair will ask whether any party desires the record to be left open for at least seven days for submittal of additional . evidence.Unless a continuance is granted or the record is left open,the Chair will close public testimony and -" - ` return the matter to the table for deliberation and decision. How To Testify- All interested persons are encouraged <> 7- to appear and testify either orally or in writing As a - - . . general rule,the applicant will have 20 minutes to testify,groups(such as neighborhood associations)will each have 10 minutes,individuals will each have S ' minutes,and the applicant will be given 5 minutes for VIC INIIY MAP rebuttal.The Development Review Commission may Testimony : What Matters ? • Approval criteria ! . . . .. . „,,, 4. iC • Professional vs. lay opinion • Interpreting Code provisions • ` _ �,� ' ” ,. ; I ,, - TM+nry s� , ,ts • �� .....�'°"'" �" err °' � �� A: s a ,gy � - w ,a �, , The Decision • Does staff recommendation reflect Commission's perspective? • If not, make tentative decision and adopt at subsequent meeting • Decision is only as good as the findings • Don't be conclusory • Resolve conflicts between material facts or laws • Address all applicable legal standards • Explain conclusion