The URL can be used to link to this page

MLP2013-00002 MLP2O13 - 00002 GRANT ELITE CARE PARTITION IIINotice of a Type II Decision Land Partitions T I G A R D Case ID: MLP2013-00002 (Grant Elite Care Partition) The Decision Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the requested land use action, subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the Final Decision and the proposal is described below. Tigard Community Development Contact Information Date of Notice: Wednesday,June 19,2013 120 days = Friday,September 27, 2013 Staff Contact: Cheryl Caines 503-718-2437 cherylc@tigard-or.gov Appeal Information All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision may appeal the decision.Appeal forms are available on the city's website or by person at the Permits Center. If you would like to appeal this land use decision, we need to receive your completed appeal form by 4 p.m. on Wednesday,July 03, 2013. Please include the Case ID Number: MLP2013-00002. Please hand-deliver your completed appeal form (which will be time-stamped) and pay the associated appeal fees at the Permits Center, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223. If you have any questions regarding this decision please address them to the appropriate staff person noted on this form: Cheryl Caines and note the Case ID Number:MLP2013-00002. This decision is final on Wednesday, June 19, 2013, and will go into effect on Thursday, July 04, 2013, unless an appeal is filed. A copy of the Final Decision is available upon request from the staff contact person noted above. Information About the Decision Applicant: Northwest Ventures Group, Inc. Owner: Elite Care Grant,LLC Derrick Aragon P.O. Box 12564 2401 NE MLK Jr. Blvd. Portland, OR 97212 Portland, OR 97212 Description of the Proposal: The applicant is requesting a Minor Land Partition to divide one (1) existing 2.62 acre site into two (2) parcels (proposed lots are 30,138 and 76,960 square feet in size). There is an existing care facility located on Parcel 1 and an accessory structure located on Parcel 2 that will remain. Parcel 2 is made up of land within the 100-year floodplain. The applicant is requesting the partition to separate the 100-year floodplain area (Parcel 2) from the care facility in order to meet financing requirements. No development is proposed with the partition. Address/Legal 12353 SW Grant Avenue Description: Washington County Tax Map2S102BA,Tax Lot 2000 Zoning: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District City of Tigard,Community Development Division•13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 pg. 1 I/CURPLN/Forms/QJ Staff Report/Notice of Type II Decision Templ_08 28 12 Appeal Procedure Detail'°'' \--T The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. The deadline for filing an appeal is 4 p.m. on Wednesday,July 03,2013 Site Map ie o 0 100 . / = _c T--, N a" 40.44.4.0 3 %`J - > SITE..`a S s�Q J MYa I I > l na cr. as t j g W • I® \94 �, 9 � l 8g�n "/ , ....w VICINITY YAP 10 c / /7/ iII, / JEGEND a. / 0 61514 OM MI• per+. �,, > >/,_'�; 1 g ,ik:/ 4 0' a111•M 1.00 104 / N,////' ,,,„ .� �`h yJIAIWZAP7.7 - 01(1•0 PM WI ) a::f , I'S,,,44, &a,' 10 �' /y ca:Y ILO VP 8000 RAS FL / +•� ,, 1010 FSNX 1,1s6.I / monis ro N:W MN \\\ 1RMRCSC.E \\� //./.! 'I _ — ---T.— ZTec ENGINEERS, INC. PROPOSED PARTMDN PLAT " ' '� 3J3]SE 101 AVE F''ORFLWO OR 9JZ02 FOR: ELITE CARE FACILITY `.. R1oNE:(OT)2358790 12353 S W.GRANT ST., TIGARD 1 FAY,(503)2.33_7Bg9 WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON ..m m..-.. zie m.. �m+i roc.ww City of Tigard,Community Development Division•13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 pg.2 I/CURPLN/Forms/QJ Staff Report/Notice of Type II Decision Templ_08 2812 NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2013-00002 11115 GRANT ELITE CARE PARTITION T I G A R D 120 DAYS = 9/27/2013 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: GRANT ELITE CARE PARTITION CASE NO.: Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP2013-00002 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting a Minor Land Partition to divide one (1) existing 2.62 acre site into two (2) parcels (proposed lots are 30,138 and 76,960 square feet in size). There is an existing care facility located on the site that will remain on Parcel 1 and an existing accessory structure and garden area located on Parcel 2 that will also be retained. Parcel 2 is made up of land within the 100-year floodplain. The applicant is requesting the partition to separate the floodplain area from the care facility in order to meet financing requirements. No development is proposed with the partition. APPLICANT: Northwest Ventures Group, Inc. OWNER: Elite Care Grant,LLC Derrick Aragon P.O. Box 12564 2401 NE MLK Jr. Blvd. Portland,OR 97212 Portland, OR 97212 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential. ZONE: R-4.5 Low Density Residential. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. LOCATION: 12353 SW Grant Avenue;Washington County Tax Map2S102BA,Tax Lot 2000. PROPOSED PARCEL 1: 30,138 Square Feet PROPOSED PARCEL 2: 76,960 Square Feet APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters, 18.390, 18.420, 18.510,and 18.790. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section V. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2013-00002/GRANT ELITE CARE PARTITION PAGE 1 OF 9 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THETINALTUVity . The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the PLANNING DIVISION,ATTN: CHERYL CAINES 503-718- 2437. 1. Prior to final plat, the applicant shall submit to the City of Tigard a canopy fee ($9,632.00) or plant trees per the approved Tree Canopy Site Plan and Supplemental Report to satisfy the 15% effective canopy requirement for Parcel 1. 2. If planting is chosen to satisfy the minimum effective canopy requirements on Parcel 1, then the applicant shall provide a tree establishment bond as outlined in the Urban Forestry Manual,Section 11,Part 2. 3. Prior to final plat the applicant shall submit to the City of Tigard the current Inventory Data Collection fee ($430.00) for urban forestry plan implementation. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to PUBLIC WORKS,MIKE WHITE (503)718-2464. 4. A Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover coordination with Clean Water Services and inspection of plantings/public improvements to satisfy CWS Design and Construction Standards. An application form and six (6) sets of detailed plans showing the requirements of CWS Service Provider Letter (SPL#13-000513) shall be submitted to the Public Works Depaituient. 5. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the CWS required improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Public Works Department will delay processing of project documents. 6. The applicant shall assure for Clean Water Services required work within the sensitive area and vegetated corridor on forms supplied by the City of Tigard. 7. The applicant's finallat shall contain State Plane Coordinates on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network (GC 22) as recorded in Washington County survey records. These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: • GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. 8. The applicant's final plat shall show all encumbrances including but not limited to an existing public sanitary sewer easement, existing public bikeway and pedestrian way easement, and required storm sewer, surface water, drainage and detention easement to City of Tigard (per CWS SPL#13-000513). 9. The applicant shall rename Parcel 2 to Tract 1 to satisfy conditions of approval of CWS SPL#13-0000513. 10. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements: A. Submit for City review four (4) paper copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon,and necessary data or narrative. B. Attach a check in the amount of the current final plat review fee ($962.00 prior to July 1,2013). C. The final plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05),Washington County,and by the City of Tigard. D. Submit final plat to Washington County for review. NOTE: Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat until they receive notice from the Public Works Department indicating that the NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2013-00002/GRANT ELI I E,CARE PARTITION PAGE 2 OF 9 • • City has reviewed the final plat and submitted comments to the applicant's surveyor. F. After the City and County have reviewed the final plat, submit one paper copy of the final plat for City Engineer signature (for partitions), or City Engineer and Community Development Director signatures (for subdivisions). THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED: WITHIN- EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS- OF-,THE EFFECTWE DATE OF THIS DECISION NOTED UNDER THE PROCESS AND APPEAL SECTION OFTHIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site and Vicinity Information The 2.62 acre site is located on the west side of SW Grant Street, south of the intersection with Tigard Street. The site is zoned R-4.5 (Low Density Residential) with I-P (Industrial Park) zoning to the north and R-12 (Medium Density Residential) to the east across Grant Street. There is an assisted living facility and barn/greenhouse on the site that will stay after the partition. A portion of the site includes Fanno Creek,associated wetlands,and the 100-year floodplain. Property History: A search of City records shows a Conditional Use Permit (CUP2000-00003) to construct two (2), 15-bedroom elderly care homes with common parking and courtyards. A Sensitive Lands Review (SLR2000-00011) was approved at the same time to install a storm pipe within the 100-year floodplain. No other land use approvals were found affecting this parcel. Proposal Description The applicant is requesting a Minor Land Partition to divide one existing 2.62 acre site into two parcels. The proposed lots are 30,138 and 76,960 square feet in size. There is an existing care facility located on the site that will remain on Parcel 1 and an existing accessory structure and garden area located on Parcel 2 that will also be retained. Parcel 2 is made up of land within the 100-year floodplain. The applicant is requesting the partition to separate the floodplain area from the care facility in order to meet financing requirements. No development or construction is proposed with the partition. However, Clean Water Service standards require plantings and enhancement of the sensitive areas and vegetated corridor and that Parcel 2 be set aside as a tract for the purposes of maintaining storm sewer,surface water,drainage,and detention functions. SECTION IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS The Tigard Community Development Code requires that property owners within 500 feet of the subject site be notified of the proposal, and be given an opportunity for written comments and/or oral testimony prior to a decision being made. No comments were received in response to the notice. SECTION V. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Land Partitions (18.420): Approval Criteria (18.420.050) The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations; FINDING: The proposed partition complies or can be made to comply with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations as demonstrated by the analysis contained within this administrative decision and through the imposition of conditions of development approval. All necessary conditions must be satisfied prior to final plat. Therefore,this criterion is met. There are adequate public facilities available to serve the proposal; FINDING: The proposal is to partition the development site in order to separate the floodplain from the portion with the assisted living facility. Public facilities currently serving the development are adequate and no further service/capacity is necessary. This criterion is met. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2013-00002/GRANT ELI I'h CARE PARTITION PAGE 3 OF 9 L � All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards;and FINDING: As the streets and utilities already exist,no public improvements are required with this decision. This criterion is met. All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements below: The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district. FINDING: The average minimum lot width required for the R-4.5 zoning district is 50 feet. Parcel 1 has an average minimum lot width of 136 feet. To meet the conditions of the Clean Water Services Service Provider Letter, Parcel 2 will have a storm sewer, surface water, drainage, and detention easement over its entirety and be renamed as Tract 1. The tract will not contain a building envelope. This criterion is met. The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot,the accessway may not be included in the lot area. FINDING: The minimum lot area requirement in the R-4.5 zoning district is 7,500 square feet for detached single-family units. The applicant states the two proposed parcels are 30,138 and 76,960 square feet respectively. No flag lots are being created.This criterion has been met. Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a legally recorded minimum 15-foot wide access easement. FINDING: Parcel 1 has over 143 feet of frontage and Parcel 2 has over 364 feet of frontage on SW Grant Street. This criterion is met. Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. FINDING: The only setbacks impacted by the proposal are the north side yard setback on Parcel 1 and the south side yard setback for Parcel 2. Side yard setbacks in the R-4.5 zone are five (5) feet. Based on the site plan provided, the existing assisted living facility will be 30 feet from the proposed side property line; and the greenhouse/barn will be eight (8) feet from the proposed side property line. This criterion is met. When the partitioned lot is a flag lot,the developer may determine the location of the front yard,provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. FINDING: There are no flag lots proposed with this application. This criterion does not apply. A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.745.040. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. FINDING: There are no accessways proposed with this partition. This criterion is does not apply. The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire-fighting capabilities. FINDING: There are no accessways proposed with this partition. This criterion does not apply. Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot, a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. FINDING: A common drive is not proposed with this application. This criterion does not apply. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2013-00002/GRANT ELITE CARE PARTITION PAGE 4 OF 9 Any access way shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.705,Access,Egress and Circulation. FINDING: The existing access was approved and constructed with the previous approval (CUP2000- 00003). The applicant is not proposing to modify the existing or construct a new access. This criterion is met. Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one-hundred year floodplain, the city shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. FINDING: A portion of the site is within the 100-year floodplain. A public easement for a pedestrian/bike path was recorded for the previous approval (CUP2000-00003). This criterion is met. An application for a variance to the standards prescribed in this chapter shall be made in accordance with Chapter 18.370,Variances and Adjustments. The applications for the partition and variance(s)/adjustment(s) will be processed concurrently. FINDING: The applicant has not requested a variance or adjustment with this proposal. This criterion does not apply. Residential Zoning Districts (18.510): Table 18.510.030.1 outlines uses permitted in residential zoning districts. FINDING: The existing use is an assisted living facility which was permitted through a conditional use permit(CUP2000-00003),and Group Living is a permitted use in the zone. No further development or new use is proposed with this application. This standard is met. Development standards in residential zoning districts are contained in Table 18.510.2 below: TABLE 18.510.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES Minimum Lot Size -Detached unit 7,500 sq.ft. 30,138 sq.ft. 76,960 sq.ft. -Duplexes -Attached unit Average Minimum Lot Width -Detached unit lots 50 ft. 136 ft. N/A -Duplex lots 90 ft. -Attached unit lots Maximum Lot Coverage - N/A N/A Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 20 ft. N/A N/A -Side facing street on corner&through lots 15 ft. N/A N/A -Side yard 5 ft. 30 ft. 8 ft. -Rear yard 15 ft. N/A N/A -Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district -- N/A N/A -Distance between property line and front ofgarage 20 ft. N/A N/A Maximum Height 30 ft. N/A N/A Minimum Landscape Requirement - N/A N/A FINDING: As shown in the table above, the proposed parcels satisfy the applicable development standards of the R-4.5 zone. The partition only impacts side lot lines, and the existing structures exceed the five (5) foot minimum side yard setback. To meet the conditions of the Clean Water Services Service Provider Letter, Parcel 2 will have a storm sewer, surface water, drainage, and detention easement over its entirety and be renamed as Tract 1. The tract will not contain a building envelope; therefore, the minimum lot width standard does not apply. The development standards are satisfied. NOTICE OF DECISION MILP2013-00002/GRANT ELI I1.CARE PARTITION PAGE 5 OF 9 Urban Forestry Plan(18.790): Urban Forestry Plan Requirements (18.790.030) A. Urban forestry plan requirements.An urban forestry plan shall: 1. Be coordinated and approved by a landscape architect (the project landscape architect) or a person that is both a certified arborist and tree risk assessor (the project arborist), except for minor land partitions that can demonstrate compliance with effective tree canopy cover and soil volume requirements by planting street trees in open soil volumes only; Street trees were planted with the Grant Street Elite Care development. The applicant cannot demonstrate compliance with the tree canopy and soil volume requirements with existing or new street trees, so an Urban Forestry Plan prepared/approved by both a certified arborist and a risk assessor has been provided. 2. Meet the tree preservation and removal site plan standards in the Urban Forestry Manual(UFM); The existing development site is being partitioned into two parcels. No additional development or tree removal is proposed at this time. The tree preservation and removal standards do not apply. 3. Meet the tree canopy site plan standards in the Urban Forestry Manual; and A Tree Canopy Site Plan was provided that identifies the canopy of existing and newly planted open grown trees on Parcel 1 and an existing stand of trees (Stand #1) on Parcel 2. According to the supplemental report, no tree growth limiting soils were found on the site; so no limiting soils are identified on the plan. The applicant's Urban Forestry Plan outlines two ways to meet the minimum effective canopy requirements (pay fee-in-lieu and planting trees). The applicant will be conditioned to implement one of the proposed methods. Both the certified arborist and certified tree risk assessor have signed the Urban Forestry site plan and attested that the plan meets the tree canopy site plan standards. 4. Meet the supplemental report standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. A supplemental report was prepared by the project arborist, Todd Prager. The report includes the required inventory data for the existing open grown trees and the existing stand of trees (UFM Section 10, Part 3, and Subsection D & E). Protection measures were not addressed as no development is proposed with this application. Soil characteristics for Parcel 1 are noted as well drained, amended top soils that were installed with the previous development. Parcel 2 has native soils that support the existing stand of primarily native trees. The arborist states that the trees appear to be healthy and that no soil amendments are needed for the site. The report includes a table that demonstrates the effective tree canopy in accordance with UFM Section 10, Part 3, and Subsection M). Because the site is zoned R-4.5, the required effective tree canopy is 40% for the entire site. Partitions in this zone also require a minimum 15% effective canopy for each lot. According to the supplemental report the effective canopy is as outlined below: Parcel 1 Parcel 2 Total Site Existing canopy 4% 190% 138% With Planted Trees 15% No change 140% The required canopy for the entire site is met; however, the minimum for Parcel 1 is not met. Parcel 1 has five existing trees. Tree #1 cannot be included due to condition. There are four small street trees (Bloodgood Japanese Maple) that are considered newly planted trees because they are less than 6-inch caliper. The project arborist has proposed the planting of four additional trees or a canopy fee-in-lieu to satisfy the minimum 15% effective canopy. The applicant has stated in the narrative the canopy fee will be paid in lieu of plantings. However, in follow-up conversations, the applicant has indicated that trees may be planted instead. Both proposed methods satisfy the minimum 15% canopy requirement; therefore the applicant is being conditioned to implement one of the proposed methods to meet the requirement. B. Tree canopy fee. If the supplemental report demonstrates that the applicable standard percent effective tree canopy cover will not be provided through any combination of tree planting or preservation for the overall development site (excluding streets) or that the 15% effective tree canopy cover will not be provided through any combination of tree planting or preservation for any individual lot or tract in the R-1, R-2, R- 3.5, R-4.5 and R-7 districts (when the overall development site meets or exceeds the standard percent NOTICE OF DECISION \ILP2013-00002/GRANT ELITE CARE PARTITION PAGE 6 OF 9 effective tree canopy cover), then the applicant shall provide the city a tree canopy fee according to the methodology outlined in the tree canopy fee calculation requirements in the Urban Forestry Manual. The supplemental report demonstrates that the 15% effective tree canopy cover will not be provided for Parcel 1. The applicant may choose to submit a tree canopy fee in lieu of planting. The canopy fee is based upon the following information using the requirements in the Urban Forestry Manual: Total Site 30,138 sq. ft. 15% Canopy 4,521 sq. ft. Existing Canopy 1,256 sq. ft. Difference 3,265 sq. ft. Fee per Sq. Ft. $2.95 Total Canopy Fee $9,632 FINDING: Based upon the facts above, the Urban Forestry Plan requirements have not been met but can be as conditioned. Urban Forestry Plan Implementation (18.790.060) C. Tree Establishment. The establishment of all trees shown to be planted in the tree canopy site plan (per 18.790.030 A.3) and supplemental report (per 18.790.030.A.4) of the previously approved urban forestry plan shall be guaranteed and required according to the tree establishment requirements in Section 11,part 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual. FINDING: The applicant originally proposed to pay the tree canopy fee in lieu of plantings; however in subsequent conversations, the applicant indicated that planting is still an option. The applicant's proposal does not address tree establishment. Therefore, the applicant is conditioned to provide a tree establishment bond that meets the requirements of the Urban Forestry Manual Section 11, Part 2. D. Urban forest inventory. Spatial and species specific data shall be collected according to the urban forestry inventory requirements in the Urban Forestry Manual for each open grown tree and area of stand grown trees in the tree canopy site plan (per Section 18.790.030.A.3) and supplemental report (per Section 18.790.030.A.4) of a previously approved urban forestry plan. Section 11, Part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual states that prior to any ground disturbance work, the applicant shall provide a fee to cover the city's cost of collecting and processing the inventory data for the entire urban forestry plan. There are five existing trees on or adjacent to Parcel 1 and an existing stand on Parcel 2. The total tree inventory fee is $430.00 ($137 + $28(4) + $181). FINDING: Standards to implement the Urban Forestry Plan have not been satisfied but can be as conditioned. Impact Study (18.390) Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:" Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large,public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property,the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2013-00002/GRANT ELITE CARE PARTITION PAGE 7 OF 9 FINDING: The applicant has submitted an impact study as required. Because no development is proposed with the application,there will be no effect on public facilities and services. ADDITIONAL CITY CONCERNS WITH FINAL PLAT: Survey Requirements: The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates [NAD 83 (91)] on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network (GC 22). These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: • GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. In addition, the applicant's as-built drawings shall be tied to the GPS network. The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins,water valves, hydrants and other water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91). SECTION VI. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS Tigard Public Works Department (Assistant Public Works Director, Brian Rager) was sent copies of the proposal and has no objection. SECTION VII. AGENCY COMMENTS Clean Water Services (CWS) has reviewed the proposal. Development within sensitive areas and vegetated corridors (including partitioning of land) must meet the requirements of CWS Design and Construction Standards (R&O 07-20). The applicant obtained a CWS Service Provider Letter (SPL#13-000513) for impact to the sensitive area and vegetated corridor, and a copy of the CWS SPL was submitted with the application. The applicant must comply with the conditions of the SPL. In addition, CWS submitted a comment letter (June 12, 2013) outlining the requirements to obtain a Storm Water Connection Permit Authorization. This authorization is required prior to any site work or partition plat recording. A copy of both CWS letters can be found in the land use file (MLP2013-00002). The City of Tigard and CWS have an intergovernmental agreement stating that the City will ensure implementation of CWS Design and Construction Standards; therefore this minor land partition approval is conditioned to satisfy CWS requirements. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (TVF&R) has reviewed the proposal and has no objection to the proposed partition. Qwest Communications states that this location falls out of the Qwest service area. SECTION VIII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JUNE 19,2013 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JULY 4,2013 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2013-00002/GRANT ELI IL CARE PARTITION PAGE 8 OF 9 Areal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON JULY 3,2013. Questions: If you have any questions,please call the City of Tigard Planning Division,Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at(503) 639-4171. June 19,2013 PREPA D BY: Cheryl Caines DATE Associate Planner ` v /'�=--. � `' '' �` l June 19,2013 APPROVED BY: Tom McGuire DA lE Assistant Community Development Director NOTICE OF DECISIONILP2013-00002/GRANT ELITE CARE PARTITION PAGE 9 OF 9 10P I 8 Q NW O SNm�.E ''''':"•-•°' ICO 10� 60.0 6A `d6� cin 6O11t4Kfi}.. \ �, I 57 4�U„c v^^A.//''�2NK 2"0`m 's SITE yam._ Aro ,:ii'' VVV��'II' �. , 1rC4MSX 17Asx a .4 / / /, 10.OgO , V" 16u \„6.A 1� qA Nye '.`"),'`„ I� / �� B1fAW 161Nx Q d ROb OIw1Nx 5 6�4.OA / �' 2l' ''I �° 6Y3W - 1 II� g , 16(6)FFP�+ te1N1® roT6N PARCEL 2 811Y2N) �1 dn. 161 .1 ,, 4P, �� '� I69 74 SO Fl 6Yt)HAw (S)1 O O$$ I� F(F 4 AIMO C(11()'A�N ,Q N 90'500•w fiv ON A ICO 1J - • 4� 0. .� es' a(9)CA fid+ '''1,02.1, �eA ¢p y. A./ '�� " VICINITY MAP ,3, 2 ._ ' --- ,. KAG-'_CCC...SA A- SA SA 3�P'`C''X'27:-.r.:0 .r sA Gro ) 0) W / 71NN .. J" CP 1C0 sA rYiT d X, NIFMNO '� '''''O4 'PAA,., 151 5ysei+aw j�� Q/� O�ri 554 N Boumk<�! , NC). / q s I,.' 10.01 O �� r'S 56A '. / \��3 / „j' swv060E Q 0 /�� LEGEND: i•. s. ; M00' (tb•ASN ,. -• ,/''''''7. %/ —SA— LASING 6EWER Y N.„ N5tt9C "{:.•, tig- ! `)•- :'�,j' 12b / 3/j/ —ST— EASING MIN J BARN A S T ,7 C % / —W— EASNG NAIR 'A•K`~`:_ N 6T171C ECExFAA1]R` m E ,�,,.. a4gNX / MING FENCE ;. ].56' \' �J/�\ ;. - +Z' / EASING MCNEIL SOMA T.L.2103 ` 6�]7]6•E t 5 AYE w_" ! `b •.' # �// O{ EINTNG ME XrBRAxi ;'®.' 1310 J ,fib. 1,-BNgMpAOR1' '�'Hi� p EASING CATO1 BASN -264.64 5 sAmbA E �� \' pROPO5E0 v, :' y ® EASIING scow MANIQE /'g 61Y by \1. 112._L 62 ....4 S7BdN1 E SW=F:7„,,,,:. QT m MIK SAMARA MANHOLE F 166 S l[ " • 91E MM.AS NOTED IS, IqT .s4-dxS,2t" � 7.IY 0 EASING MT POLE Ina-Fi J q w EASING POMR MI W- `lv:v�M11 i lit •' T A6,1 N II.2IGS w • MEW Ml(R VkAf A. -0 p ni? Nor ,� ,�1 et 26x //Alr e31• BLOC.z •i' ♦ 2, c \ `1 - EASING srAEE7 SIGN Ima1-0 �' ss,an9'[ 1N�-`//� \ REI \ ' \11� 1107 S0.Fr. \; o,� N 36.20'16• xn r.0 - :!`'141444S4,10,/kti'''' ..,, ‘14 ''''''''4 4. MJ REA. (11'Ni„' ., N„,,,E 4,.. 1.06=5.`, ♦ i�G. 1zn r.t.Ieol 1/ T.L.1900 ➢� �� '/.�',�/ 100 M.FLOOD PLAIN EL 155.1 / i A a y., 500 YR.ROOD PLAIN EL.156.1 44,4044,444 ELEVATIONS TO NGW 1929 / m / T.L.1800 C'\\!<' / aA/ '4 ..;;Vt./✓/'// J GRAPHIC SCALE s ' / a / 0 18 b 0 / Ocr. FRIT�1 .7b 1�4 3, NN N Nmm OM =MRS ENGINEERS INC. PROPOSED PARTITION PLAT "e Y6' sew "2542ARE P JN v2252JPUT OWLL3737 S.E. 8TH AVE., PORTLAND, OR. 97202 FOR: ELITE CARE FACILITY ,, 691® 1J0 ' PHONE: (503) 235-8795 12353 S.W. GRANT ST., TIGARD ' FAX: (503) 233-7889 WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON PLOT DATE-4-29-13 Z0EC CAD FILE:\V22842_5RE PUTA+A REQUEST FOR COMMENTS . City of Tigard T I G A R D REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: May 30,2013 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Cheryl Caines,Associate Planner Phone: (503) 718-2437 Fax: (503) 718-2748 E-mail: Cherylc(c�tigard-or.gov MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2013-00002 - GRANT ELITE CARE PARTITION - REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a Minor Land Partition to divide one (1) existing 2.62 acre site into two (2) parcels (proposed lots are 30,138 and 76,960 square feet in size). There is an existing care facility located on the site that will remain on Parcel 1 and an existing accessory structure and garden area located on Parcel 2 that will also be retained. Parcel 2 is made up of land within the 100-year floodplain. The applicant is requesting the partition to separate the floodplain area from the care facility in order to meet financing requirements. No development is proposed with the partition. LOCATION: 12353 SW Grant Avenue; Washington County Tax Map2S102BA,Tax Lot 2000. ZONE: R-4.5: The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single- family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, and 18.790. The Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Proposal Description are attached for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Friday, June 14, 2013. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions,contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter or email. Written comments provided below: Name&Number of Person Commenting: CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR CO. ANTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FILE NOS.: M L-?01 O 13 - O OO O a FILE NAME: ( v- v'4 Ca..-c, M l4 CITY OFFICES _C.D.ADMINISTRATION/Kenny Asher,CD Director _DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/ !Arborist _C.D.ADMINISTRATION/Tom McGuire,Asst.CD Director j[BUILDING DIVISION/Mark VanDomelen,Building Official _HEARINGS OFFICER(+2 sets) _CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder POLICE DEPARTMENT/Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer _PLANNING COMMISSION(+12 sets) _DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/Planning-Engineering Techs. X PUBLIC WORKS/Brian Rager,Assistant PW Director CITY ATORNEY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/Development Eng. X PUBLIC WORKS/Karleen,.rAichele,Engineer Tech 1 X FILE/REFERENCE(+2 sets) S IAL _ TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.*_X TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE* _ TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT*X CLEAN WATER SERVICES* Planning Manager North Division Administrative Office Development Services Department 15707 SW Walker Road John Wolff,Deputy Fire Marshall 1850 SW 170"'Avenue David Schweitzer/SVVM Program Beaverton,OR 97006 11945 SW 70th Ave Beaverton,OR 97006 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway Tigard OR 97223-9196 Hillsboro,OR 97123 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON* _ CITY OF TUALATIN* ZC OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDUFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS — Planning Manager Planning Manager Elizabeth Ruther,Habitat Biologist Melinda Wood(WLUN Form Required) _ Steven Sparks,Dev.Svcs.Manager 18880 SW Martinazzi Avenue North Willamette Watershed District 775 Summer Street NE,Suite 100 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 18330 NW Sauvie Island Road Salem,OR 97301-1279 Beaverton,OR 97076 Portland,OR 97231 _ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING* _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE — CITY OF DURHAM 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 17160 SW Upper Boones Fry.Rd. _ Joanna Mensher,Data Resource Center(ZCA-Adopted) &US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97224 _ Paulette Copperstone,(ZCA-RFC only) _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. Kathryn Harris(Maps&CWS Letter Only) _ 0.Gerald Uba,Ph.D.,(CPNocazoN) Mara Ulloa(Comp.Plan Amendments&Measure 37) Routing CENWP-OP-G —CITY OF KING CITY* 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 PO Box 2946 City Manager Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946 15300 SW 116th Avenue King City,OR 97224 WASHINGTON COUNTY _ OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(Powedlnes in Area) _OR.DEPT OF AVIATION(Monopole Towers) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Tom Highland,Planning 155 N.First Avenue _ CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO* Routing TTRC–Attn: Renae Ferrera 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 Naomi Vogel-Beattie(General App: Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Brent Curtis(CPA) _ OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT,REGION 1 * _Assessment&Taxation(ZCA)MS 9 _CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) _Development Review Coordinator _Darla Mateja,Cartography RCA)MS 14 Planning Bureau Director Regional Administrator _Carl Torland, Right-of-Way Section(vacations) 1900 SW 4h'Avenue,Suite 4100 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 _OR.PARKS&REC.DEPT. _WA.CO.CONSOL.COMM.AGNCY _ODOT,REGION 1-DISTRICT 2A* _ODOT,RAIL DIVISION STATE HISTORIC Dave Austin(wcccA)P911"ptunop.k T.w.n) Chad Gordon,Assistant District Manager (Notify M ODOT R/R-Hwy.Crossing is Only Access to Land) PRESERVATION OFFICE PO Box 6375 6000 SW Raab Road Dave Lanning,Sr.Crossing Safety Spedalist (Notify it Property Has HD Overlay) Beaverton,OR 97007-0375 Portland,OR 97221 555-13th Street,NE,Suite 3 725 Sumner St.NE,Suite C Salem,OR 97301-4179 Salem,OR 97301 U'II11T PROVIDERS`AND SPE TA MERCIES' —PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington NorthemlSanta Fe R/R Predecessor) Bruce Carswell,President&General Manager 200 Hawthorne Avenue SE,Suite C320 Salem,OR 97301-5294 —SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _COMCAST CABLE CORP. _TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer COMMISSION(MACC) Gerald Backhaus(sae Kap for Are.Content) (It Project is Within%Mile of a Transit Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Fred Christ(Annexations Only) 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 15201 NW Greenbrier Parkway,C-1 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 XPORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC k NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY 1 VERIZON X. CENTURYLINK Mike Hieb Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. John Cousineau,OSP Network Lynn Smith 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue 4155 SW Cedar Hills Blvd. Right-of-Way Manager,OR&SW1/ Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97005 8021 SW Capitol Hill Road Portland,OR 97219 _TIGARD/TUALATINSCHTOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 _COMCAST CABLE CORP. _COMCAST CABLE COMMUNIC. Teri Brady,Administrative Offices Jennifer Garland,Demographics Alex Silantiev (see map lot Area c.e.a) Brian Every(App.E.orHAM or 99W) 6960 SW Sandburg Street 16550 SW Merlo Road 9605 SW Nimbus Avenue,Bldg.12 10831 SW Cascade Avenue Tigard,OR 97223-8039 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Beaverton,OR 97008 Tigard,OR 97223-4203 * INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WIf i INTERGOYERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500'OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOA ANT/ALL CITY PROJECTS(Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). I:1CURPLN\Masters\Request For Comments Notification List.doc (UPDATED Feb 25 2013) (If you update this roster,also update I:1(UNPIN\Masten\Request for Comments Notification Labels.doc)(This document is password protected.Please see Chris or Doreen if you need updates. Thank you.) Cheryl Caines From: Smith, Lynn <Lynn.Smith@CenturyLink.com> Sent: Tuesday,June 04, 2013 2:48 PM To: Cheryl Caines Subject: GRANT ELITE CARE PARTITION Good day, In response to your request for comment on the following project GRANT ELITE CARE PARTITION MLP 2013-00002 This location falls outside of the Qwest/Centurylink serving area,therefore we have no objection to this proposal. Thank you for the opportunity to review and respond. Have a great day Lynn kynn M Smith Crintury-kink'Right of Way Managszr Orggon and SW Washington 80218W Capitol 11111 R,d Portland,Or 97219 503-242-6376 Off ie¢ 1 Cheryl Caines From: Brian Rager Sent: Tuesday,June 04, 2013 2:47 PM To: Cheryl Caines Subject: MLP 2013-00002, Grant Street Elite Care Hey Cheryl, I took a quick look at this one and see no issues with it that would concern PW. Thanks, Brian Rager Assistant Public Works Director City of Tigard I Public Works Department 503-718-3471 brianr@tigard-or.gov DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained bytheCityofTiqardinoomp|ianoewithiheO^egnnAdminiatrativeRu|es ^CityGenero| RenondaRetenhonSchedu|e.^ 1 ` CityII f��'' �r�| ��" " ��m�' �� T��'� COMMENTS TIGARD "^^��~'^^�� " FOR ~�~^�,^^,^^�^` ^ " � -~ ��- �~, ~ mm�~� ^ � .- �� '� =---"t„,„fi DATE: Hay 30.2013 TO: John Wolff Deputy Fire MmsholiTuo\u1iu Valley Fire & Rescue r,,,,\~ �t - � /`' '�- FROM: ChvoFTigard Planning Division - ,e; , , .r ,,_^� ST\FT CONT \CT: Cheryl Cuims.A*n iate Planner Phone: (503)718-2437 Fax: (50])7|8-274V 6-mail: Chundc{�(igmd-ocm0\' MlN(}R LAND PARTITION (MLP)2013-00002 -GRANT ELITE PARTITION- REQUEST: ��7�K1��l��_ ��~� �^ ` � �� CARE ` ' �"~� � � �� RE(}LJBST: The applicant is requesting a |-|inc« Land Partition to divide one (1) ex|et|ng 2.62 acre site into two (2) parcels (proposed lots are 30,138 and 76,960 square feet in size). There is an existing care facility located on the site that will remain on Parcel 1 and an existing accessory structure and garden area located on Parcel 2 that will also be retained. Parcel 2 is made up of land within the 100_yourOoodp|uin. '[be applicant is requesting the partition to separate the floodplain area from the care facility in order to meet financing requirements. No development is proposed vj.{h the partition. LOCATION: 12353 S\X" Grant Avenue; Washington County Tax K4ap2S1O2K\,Tax Lot 2000. ZON E: R-4.5: Tile R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a mininlum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single- family units are permitted in8|,-funoi|yuodaucopernnitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses arc also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, and 18.790. The Site Plan, Vicinity various departments and agencies and -from other infom-ntion available to our staff;a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE N EED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Friday. June 14, 2013. You may use the space provided belov:or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions,contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. 1PL2/\8E CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: - X I' have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact __ _ __________________ _ _ _ — -- o[our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter or email, Written comments provided below: As there are no proposed structures TVFR has no objections to this application. CleanWater Services MEMORANDUM JUN Date: June 12, 2013 To: Cheryl Caines, Associate P1 er, City of Tigard From: Jackie Sue Humphreys, lean Water Services (the District) Subject: Grant Elite Care Partition, MLP 2013-00002, 2S102BA02000 Please include the following comments when writing your conditions of approval: PRIOR TO ANY WORK ON THE SITE AND PARTITION PLAT RECORDING A Clean Water Services (the District) Storm Water Connection Permit Authorization must be obtained prior to plat approval and recordation. Application for the District's Permit Authorization must be in accordance with the requirements of the Design and Construction Standards,Resolution and Order No. 07-20, (or current R&O in effect at time of Engineering plan submittal), and is to include: a. Detailed plans prepared in accordance with Chapter 2, Section 2.04.2.b-l. b. Detailed grading and erosion control plan. An Erosion Control Permit will be required. Area of Disturbance must be clearly identified on submitted construction plans. No /')17-4",, c. Detailed plans showing each lot within the development having direct access by gravity to public storm and sanitary sewer. N !� d. Show all existing and proposed easements on plans. Any required storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water quality related easements must be granted to the City. ��, , _� G ,, , e. Site contains a"Sensitive Area." Applicant shall comply with the conditions as set forth in the Service Provider Letter No. 13-00Q513, dated April 16, 2013. ;.e 94 l? 5 k-! g. Detailed plans showing the sensitive area and corridor delineated, along with restoration and enhancement of the corridor. _. r h. Any proposed offsite construction activities will require an update or amendment to the current Service Provider Letter for this project. a,,x f CONCLUSION This Land Use Review does not constitute the District's approval of storm or sanitary sewer compliance to the NPDES permit held by the District. The District,prior to issuance of any connection permits, must approve final construction plans and drainage calculations. MAILING / NOTIFICATION RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING TIGARD I, Cheryl Caines, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Associate Planner for the City of Tigard,Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: )Ch xk Appropuao Box(s)Below} 0 NOTICE OF TYPE II PROPOSAL CASE ID: MLP2013-00002 ELITE CARE PARTITION ❑ AMENDED NOTICE A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit "A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit "B", and by reference made a part hereof, on May 30,2013 and deposited in the United States Mail on May 30,2013,postage prepaid. (Person that Prepared Notice) STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington) ss. City of'Tigard ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the_ day of tv110A) ,2013. OFFICIAL SEAL ) /� 1 ik' /1 TIMOTHY PATRICK LEHRBACH t 1 � �/' NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON � OTARY PUBLIC OF OREGO COMMISSION DECEMBER 153 (� My Expires:1 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 13,2016(,) Commission Ex EXHIBIT A 'PI Notice of a Type II Proposal C Land Partitions T`G A>z D Case ID: MLP2013-00002 Tigard Community Development Contact Information Date of Notice: Thursday, May 30, 2013 120 days = Friday, September 27, 2013 To: Interested Persons Staff Contact: Cheryl Caines 503-718-2437 cherylc@tigard-or.gov If you would like to comment on this proposal, we need to receive your written comments by 5 p.m. on Friday, June 14, 2013 . Please mail or deliver your comments to 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223. Include the Case ID Number: MLP2013-00002. Please address your comments to the appropriate staff person: Cheryl Caines. Information About the Proposal Description of the Proposal: The applicant is requesting a Minor Land Partition to divide one (1) existing 2.62 acre site into two (2) parcels (proposed lots are 30,138 and 76,960 square feet in size). There is an existing care facility located on the site that will remain on Parcel 1 and an existing accessory structure and garden area located on Parcel 2 that will also be retained. Parcel 2 is made up of land within the 100-year floodplain. The applicant is requesting the partition to separate the floodplain area from the care facility in order to meet financing requirements. No further development is proposed for the site. Applicant: Northwest Ventures Group, Inc. Derrick Aragon 2401 NE MLK Jr. Blvd. Portland, OR 97212 Owner 1: Elite Care Grant,LLC P.O. Box 12564 Portland, OR 97212 Owner 2: None Proposal Address: 12353 SW Grant Avenue Legal Washington County Tax Map2S102BA,Tax Lot 2000 Description: Zoning: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District Approval Criteria: Community Development Code 18.420.050 City of Tigard,Community Development Division•13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 What You Should Know About This Type II Proposal The proposed development requires a land use review. The goal of this notice is to invite interested parties to participate early in the decision-making process by submitting comments in writing during the open comment period. Type II decisions are made by the Community Development Director after consideration of relevant evidence and public comments received during the open comment period. The decision will be mailed to the applicant and to owners of property located within 500 feet of the proposal site and anyone who submitted written comments or is otherwise entitled to a decision notice. The decision maker may: • Approve the proposal. • Approve the proposal with conditions. • Deny the proposal. All evidence considered in the decision will be contained in the public record and available for public review. If you would like to review this material, please schedule an appointment with Lora Garland, Records Management Specialist, 503-718-2483. If you wish to receive copies of the materials, city records will prepare them for you at a reasonable cost. Appeal Information Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Comments directed at the relevant approval criteria (Tigard Development Code) are what constitute relevant evidence. Details regarding the appeal process and requirements are contained within Tigard Development Code Chapter 18.390. There is a fee charged for appeals. Attachments Included in this Notice Zoning and Site Map Notice to Mortgagee, Lienholder,Vendor, or Seller The Tigard Development Code requires that if you receive this notice it shall be promptly forwarded to the purchaser. City of Tigard,Community Development Division•13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 Site Map RT ° , 0 SITEmqv 4.. , c °. •` �iOYM era R\- 5" �`� ° M . op PA 8"t"' ild "'Qt. o ` 0R' Il �� sgfp6� m o"" .Mo 1 ,M A. MM qn+ ° 11 `� f; Oma +�f ..b• / 411 ".. VICINITY MAP lir° a AV"' M, - r "`• !"Q Re /C., / °-- LEGEND' 5 ..4*. *.I. w ``er1_±ate_- r / / ,>// MIK r� /Vl d sem., L e -ate i / 4/� • '....4;01'. "t, // • -ys 5, /r t x.,, • /1 .t�,. p sq M '. A;':4 'N144. *:.‘,.. .:n 0.N* s4 ,%/0,/ ..., ,:..-4/71,-./,/ R. ItO At.ROOD PAP tl t55 tv 5005R( 01 RNA EL 156.r COMM 10 MCO TMH — ? ,x\ Bx crmC SCALE --c .1 i� =-7-117-= ZTec ENGINEERS, INC. PROPOSED PARTITION PLAT � `' .;.2?SI 8T0 AVE,PORTLAND.OP.97202 ,� FOR: ELITE CARE FACILITY PHONE:(503)235-8795 12353 S.W.GRANT ST..TIGARD RPP ma)23.3-7899 WASHINGTON COLA TY.OREGON 1 PIM OMR 4-21/-el >s ru.u,rNa:_ wee Comments: Proposed two lot partition (A1LP2013-00002). Zoning Map -..w Zoning Map x 750.5.p...rtetSgre 1-,13R-12 PS,, , •f 4:t:,' rtitiok - R-4 // \ µ Comments: Zoning of site and surrounding area. City of Tigard,Community Development Division•13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 - EXHIBIT B 1114 ., City of Tigard Request for 500' Property Owner Mailing Labels PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION IS VXLID FOR 3 MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF YOUR REQUEST Contact staff member: Chris Wiley, Phone: 503-718-2714 or christinew©tigard-or.gov PLEASE INDICATE ALL MAP&TAX LOT NUMBERS (i.e. 1 S134AB,Tax Lot 00100)THAT ARE INCLUDED IN YOUR PROJECT OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW: (If more than one(1)tax lot or if the parcel has no address,you must separately identify each tax lot associated with the project.) JZ 3 c ft 4u ONLY 1 SET OF LABELS WILL BE PROVIDED AT THIS TIME FOR HOLDING YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING. After submitting your land use application to the City,and the project planner has reviewed your application for completeness,you will be notified by means of an incompleteness letter to obtain your 2 final sets of labels. IF YOU HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED BY PLANNING TO OBTAIN YOUR LABELS, PLEASE INDICATE BELOW THAT YOU NEED 2 SETS OF LABELS. 171 Completeness Letter Received Indicating 2 Sets of Envelopes w/Affixed Address Labels Required The 2 final sets of labels need to be placed on envelopes (no self-adhesive envelopes please)with first class letter-rate postage on the envelopes in the form of postage stamps (no metered envelopes and no return address) and resubmitted to the City for the purpose of providing notice to property owners of the proposed land use application and the decision. The 2 sets of envelopes must be kept separate. The person listed below will be called to pick up and pay for the labels when they are ready. NAME OF CONTACT PERSON: ,Qc'f , G �� tx� o ,� PHONE: (C(-)._ )-7` - 6c-t ( NAME OF COMPANY: /0'4' Gln inJ c c{- Oe n 1 5 (-1 C7 rt.. 1 FAX: ( )- EMAIL: This request can be sent by e-mail,US mail,or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a 2-day minimum for processing requests. Upon completion of your request, the contact person listed will be called to pick up their request that will be placed in "Will Call"by the company name (or by the contact person's last name if no company) at the Planning/Engineering Counter in the Permit Center. The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up,as exact cost cannot be pre-determined. PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PROVIDED BY THE CITY VS. RE-TYPED MAILING LABELS [VILL BE ACCEPTED. Cost Description: $11 to generate the mailing list,plus $2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels (20 addresses per sheet). Then,multiply the cost to print one set of labels by the number of sets requested. - EXAMPLE - - COST FOR THIS REQUEST- sheets of labels x$2/sheet=$8.00 x 2 sets= $16.00 3 sheet(s)of labels x$2/sheet=$ x sets= 1 sheets of labels x$2/sheet for interested parties x 2 sets= $ 4.00 A sheet(s)of labels x$2/sheet for interested parties=S it ds sets= GENERATE LIST = $11.00 GENERATE LIST = $11.00 TOTAL = $31.00 TOTAL =5 3 C:\Users\CherylC\Appllata\Local\Microsoft\Windows\'Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\IIRJNYIKY\500'Property Owner Mailing Labels Request.doc (Updated: 07 May 13) y ___I ..._ \\\..cc r _ • ..p x - . c . -,,—I:: _ 1---- ! Area Notified (500 Ft) • W 1 Ale �� ►'�� Q • �1grr;Ch Aragon 1 �,�•�� _ L. . Jii1`Ventures Group _. KATHE INE T - • 1 v •- - —- I Tax Lot 2S1 Q7oA02000 Oma' , ` FN7ER Si- , 12353 SM Grant Ave x Alp 401rat t ., '"4444,?t c 1.*s.i. 40/ --'-'1-/---\ L V 1:11:'"t/CPA„„„,,, ;;:ft:; Subject Site rk \Z•t"---1 4i pi , • • ,. . "0,1 �3.' . 4 ' /(//77.,/ (c:3 months L•om the dale pnn?en 0,i�j�� i th.s reap_ "40, ir /, ---, 1,44, 4,s,,, _,..♦ mo / •4.,-&„„ ' , '.1an i'nr•.ter•Ai Way.•t >, 4 .4„41>� N .. ; 4',. �/ G�� 40 CSP\ mair,.,,�::I,t env*:w / I�/� f L.al. :1i✓4R\:”.0,14J IV..5C4••c-5 'R' I.a✓--1 /�� J. •.la E•.•:.T;1u.cR:Y.7R=-RET3 N. 7 'aa"R:,7 5 -O-. YQ ' , MC \ 1' M E3AR 4 1. --` N I' 1(^ T of SOA•"ri'•1 Itr.,:I I . ' i '.Fp a .RDt1eE14_3^wC -' ✓0\'aJ"- T s, �'F� � 111 / . ?14C s.. / O 1 COF.I F.-0U�'Tv DEVELOPMENT DEPARTfdEt' \J/ ♦ sT O I �/' W I / fO M* .s —� City of TIttprd i-� O• _ Creek e(tD S 13125 s;^a ale'.B:M 'IL� //��(r/ ir 1 d '�, j)�aA �1 P troa•d OR a By /' 4i<'7 �\\� /\ CS, sb ,•Ic / /�� _ +'\ Pork of 503539417'V Tit 00111 // es„Dgartl-or o 2S102BA00303 2S102BA02000 ANDREWS MANAGEMENT LTD ELITE CARE GRANT LLC TIGARD INDUSTRIAL LLC PO BOX 12564 5845 JEAN RD PORTLAND OR 97212 LAKE OSWEGO OR 97035 2S102BA02800 2S102BA01190 ARNDT,LOUISE S ELKINS,ALVIN S TR 9801 SW JOHNSON ST ELKINS,ERNEST TR TIGARD OR 97223 30490 SW ROGUE LN#3112 WILSONVILLE OR 97070 2S102BB00833 2S102BA00501 BEISER,ROBERT&CHRISTINE ELLIOTT,JAMES R&SHERRY D 10050 SW JOHNSON ST PO BOX 570 TIGARD OR 97223 EAGLE CREEK OR 97022 2S102BB01800 2S102BA02102 BEMIS,THERESA ENGH, KENNETH A/SHELLEY L 12535 SW GRANT AVE 9955 SW JOHNSON STREET TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2810213B01400 2S1026601202 BOGDEN,ROBERT W AND FORD,ROBIN UKELLY J BARBARA J 10010 SW JOHNSON ST 9940 SW JOHNSON STREET TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S102BA02100 2S102BA01000 BORSCH, LUCILLE HUGHES AND GREEN VALLEY DEVELOPMENT LLC JOSEPH ANTHONY BY GARY HELMER 9935 SW JOHNSON ST 10585 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S102BA02600 2S102BA01100 BROWN,WILLIAM C& HADLEY,JOHN W& KIMBERLY J HADLEY,BARBARA A PO BOX 1001 12220 SW GRANT AVE TUALATIN OR 97062 TIGARD OR 97223 2S102BB01000 2S102BA04700 COCHRANE,CHRISTINE M&BRUCE W HAWKINS,SARAH C 10085 SW JOHNSON ST PEARCE,MATTHEW S TIGARD OR 97223 9865 SW JOHNSON ST TIGARD OR 97223 2S102BA02900 2S1022801801 CORDUAN,PETER M HAYES, NATHANIEL D&LISA J THIBEAU,VALERIE L 8135 SW HEMLOCK ST 3531 SW DOLPH CT TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97219 2S102BB01302 2S102BA00900 EISENHAUER,WILLIAM D&DAWN P HOLSCHER, MICHAEL E&LAREE 10000 SW JOHNSON ST PO BOX 230397 TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97281 2S102BA02103 2S102BB01301 HOTCHKISS,SEAN P&KRISTENA D MURRAY,JAMES A&MOLLY 9965 SW JOHNSON ST 9982 SW JOHNSON ST TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S102BA00500 251028801802. JACKSON, PAUL R&SIMONE D NEGREANU,DUMITRU&LILI 10250 TIGARD ST 7765 SW 0 BRIEN ST TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 2S102131301201 2S102BA01502 JANSEN,STEVEN J NEIFFER,KIM P 10030 SW JOHNSON ST 12330 SW GRANT AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S102BA02101 2S102BA01500 JONES,MATTHEW 01& NORTHWEST INVESTMENT HOLDINGS LL PENCE-JONES,ANNA R PO BOX 1152 9945 SW JOHNSON ST GIG HARBOR WA 98335 TIGARD OR 97223 2S102BA02700 2S102BA01503 KUNIS,ANTHONY WALTER&ELAINE NORTHWEST INVESTMENT HOLDINGS LL FRANCES KUNIS LIVING TRUST PO BOX 1152 21614 NW PIHL RD GIG HARBOR WA 98335 BANKS OR 97106 28102BB01200 1S135CB00800 LEARY,DAVID L AND OREGON DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION KATHLEEN J RIGHT OF WAY SECTION 10020 SW JOHNSON 355 CAPITOL STREET NE,RM 420 TIGARD OR 97223 SALEM OR 97301 2S102BA030002S102BA04800 LUONG,LAC PERRY,LORINDA 9777 SW JOHNSON ST 12385 SW GRANT ST TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 2S102BA00390 2S102BA01601 MCCALL PROPERTIES LLC PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC BY NED MCCALL COMPANY 5480 NW FRONT AVE 121 SW SALMON ST PORTLAND OR 97210 PORTLAND OR 97204 2S102BA01400 2S102BA01600 MCHUGH,PHIL PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CANYON RD INVESTORS LLC COMPANY WOODARD PARK ASSOCIATES LLC 121 SW SALMON ST 6823 SW CANYON RD PORTLAND OR 97204 PORTLAND OR 97225 2S102BA00600 2S102BA00901 MULL,GREGORY S AND REA,KEN TRUST MULL,GEORGE E BY REA,KEN TRUSTEE 19350 SW POMONA DR PO BOX 230365 BEAVERTON OR 97007 TIGARD OR 97281 2S102BA02300 2S102BA02500 REED,ADAM STROUM,EVAN P REED, CARL 12380 SW GRANT AVE 6045 SW OLD SCHOLLS FERRY RD TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 2S102AB01801 2S102BA00301 RISBERG SURVIVORS TRUST TIGARD INDUSTRIAL LLC BY KATHRYNE J RISBERG TR 5845 JEAN RD 4210 IMPERIAL DR LAKE OSWEGO OR 97035 WEST LINN OR 97068 2S102BA00800 2S102BA00302 SEE-ZER PROPERTIES TIGARD INDUSTRIAL LLC PO BOX 965 5845 JEAN RD NEWBERG OR 97132 LAKE OSWEGO OR 97035 2S102BB01300 2S102BA00304 SHEARER, EMMETT J/EL.1SE C TIGARD INDUSTRIAL LLC 9980 SW JOHNSON 5845 JEAN,RD TIGARD OR 97223 LAKE OSWEGO OR 97035 2S102BB01500 2S102BA00300 SIMELE, PAUL E TIGARD INDUSTRIAL LLC NUGYEN, HANH T 5845 JEAN RD 12583 SW 116TH AVE LAKE OSWEGO OR 97035 TIGARD OR 97223 2510213800900 2S102BA00400 SMITH, CHARLES R&DEBRA D TIGARD STREET LLC 10065 SW JOHNSON ST 830 CABANA LN TIGARD OR 97223 LAKE OSWEGO OR 97034 2S102BB01600 2S102BA01701 ST ANTHONY CATHOLIC CHURCH TIGAR TIGARD,CITY OF 9905 SW MCKENZIE ST 13125 SW HALL TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S102BB01700 2S102BA01501 ST ANTHONY CATHOLIC CHURCH TIGAR TIGARD,CITY OF 9905 SW MCKENZIE ST 13125 SW HALL TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S102BD00100 2S102AB01802 ST ANTHONY CATHOLIC CHURCH TIGAR TIGARD,CITY OF 9905 SW MCKENZIE ST 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S102BA02200 2S102BA01401 STROUM,DONALD M& TIGARD,CITY OF ANDREA J 13125 SW HALL BLVD 9975 SW JOHNSON ST TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S102AB06000 TRI-MET METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTAT DISTRICT OF OREGON 710 NE HOLLADAY AT PORTLAND OR 97232 2S102BA04900 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO 1700 FARNHAM ST, 10TH FL SOUTH OMAHA NE 68102 2S102BA01900 WAGNER,EDWARD AND MARIE G TRUSTEES 9885 SW JOHNSON ST TIGARD OR 97223 2S102AB01800 WRAN LLC 9460 SW TIGARD ST TIGARD OR 97223 Easy Peeler Labels MONMEM! i Band along I � ; DAvERve5161® Use Avery®Template 5161® F Paper .+......•1 expose Pop-up E,;yeTM ALEXANDER CRAGHEAD JULIE RUSSELL,CPO 4B CHAIR 12205 SW HALL BOULEVARD 12662 SW TERRAVIEW DRIVE TIGARD OR 97223-6210 TIGARD OR 97224 GENE MILDREN BRAD SPRING MILDREN DESIGN GROUP 7555 SW SPRUCE STREET 7650 SW BEVELAND ST, STE 120 TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 NATHAN AND ANN MURDOCK CHARLIE AND LARIE STAIZER 7415 SW SPRUCE STREET 14781 SW JULIET TERRACE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 PATTY NEWTH ROSS SUNDBERG 12180 SW MERESTONE COURT 16382 SW 104TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 TODD HARDING&BLAKE HERING JR. WILLIAM S. FARGHER NORRIS BEGGS&SIMPSON EQUITY BUILDERS REALTY 121 SW MORRISON,SUITE 200 10300 SW 92ND AVENUE PORTLAND OR 97204 HAPPY VALLEY OR 97086 SHANNEN WILLIAMS RAPPOLD MARKETING/BUSINESS DEV MGR DAVID WALSH PERLO CONSTRUCTION 10236 SW STUART COURT 7190 SW SANDBURG ST TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 SUE RORMAN BRIAN WEGENER 11250 SW 82ND AVE 9830 SW KIMBERLY DRIVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 LISA HAMILTON,CPO 4B VICE CHAIR CAROL RENAUD—WACO CPO NEWSLETTER COORDINATOR 13565 SW BEEF BEND ROAD OR STATE UNIV EXTENSION SVC-CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT FACULTY TIGARD OR 97224 155 NORTH 1sT AVENUE SUITE 200 MS48 HILLSBORO OR 97124 No persons currently want be notified about SOUTH or CENTRAL developme ONL • /iley/My Documents/John Floyd/Lennar Annex IP and App Mailing Labels Created for this project:4/22/13 Etiquettes faciles a peler A ; Repliez a la hachure afin de www.avery.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®5161® Sens de chargement i reveler le rebord Pap-upmc 1-800-GO-AVERY Easy Peel®Labels Bend along ltim,a C\AVERY65161® Use Avery®Template 5161® Feed Paper '—•�"'�� expose Pop-up EageTM DON&DOROTHY ERDT The following labels list i rest persons who requested notice 13760 SW 121sT AVENUE re:ANY development ANY RE in Tigard. See Memo for File re: TIGARD OR 97223 Interested Parties Update Au st 2012. BARRY ALBERTSON VANESSA FOSTER 15445 SW 150TH AVE 13085 SW HOWARD DR TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 SUSAN BEILKE MONA KNAPP 11755 SW 114TH PLACE 9600 SW FREWING STREET TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 ELLEN BEILSTEIN BEVERLY FROUDE 14630 SW 139TH AVE 12200 SW BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 HEIDI BRENNEMAN NAOMI GALLUCCI 11680 SW TIGARD DRIVE 11285 SW 78TH AVENUE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 GRETCHEN BUEHNER CPO 4B MAILING ADDRESS 13249 SW 136TH PLACE 16200 SW PACIFIC HWY,STE H, BOX 242 TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 REX CAFFALL KEVIN HOGAN 13205 SW VILLAGE GLENN 143357 SW 133R°AVENUE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 LORA GARLAND,CITY RECORDS HAROLD AND RUTH HOWLAND CITY OF TIGARD 13145 SW BENISH 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 PATRICIA KEERINS NOTE:t Don't mail e Citypf Tigard label 12195 SW 121sT AVE if there is already a la "for City of Tigard TIGARD OR 97223 printed from the GI S,I bel 'st. /iley/My Documents/John Floyd/Lem r Ann IP and App Mailing Labels Crto .or this project:4/22/13 Etiquettes faciles a peter I Repliez a la hachure afin de vvww.averycom •r.P ___ 1. —.4._.a warena.r�}F.e r.a Cn..r w�.. iL. ....we«.r.eS �o..Gi�..l.,��4.�...J n.. ...Mf . ww.. s.. ...__., APPLICANT MATERIALS 11,z.: PRE-APP.1 BY: .q CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIV'''$u , . .. c LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION City of Tigard Pernit Center 13125 SW Hall Bled, Tigard OR 97223 t013. Phone. 503.639.4171 Fax: 503.598.1960g�� ppb ,- ; PLANCM .-s '..xt:\E„t ti3 File# Nl Uma U 13 - 0000 a Other Case# Date 5-6 - /3 By I Gc^66-'1' I Receipt 11 1 d 5 ,� y�f. P Fee Date Complete TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR ❑Adjustment/Variance (I or II) r . Minor Land Partition(II) ❑Zone Change (III) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment(IV) Planned Development(III) ❑Zone Change Annexation(IV) ❑ Conditional Use (IIT) ❑Sensitive Lands Review (I,II or III) ❑ Zone Ordinance Amendment(IV) ❑ Historic Overlay(II or III) ❑Site Development Review(II) ❑Home Occupation(II) ❑ Subdivision(II or III) LOCATION WHERE PROPOSED ACTIVITY WILL OCCUR(Address if available) 1.1-33-3 i4t&, 776oz 4/131a-203 TAX MAPS&TAX LOT NOS. 774 tort as 1OZ 1rOZ03 , -nt4.e rzragg-IO2,51 TOTAL SITE SIZE ZONING CLASSIFICATION 2..102- Acges g -`t•5 '""\uCANT F Nara-rues Qom, (oz. MAILING ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP ZLf0 t 1z btu: ZD UUP( P* .* ( & - q 2c2 PHONE NO. FAX NO. 5o3-ava-LAR f, 563-2 -N34- PRIMARY CONTACT PERSON PHONE NO. PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER(Attach list if more than one) 1Ec.,c.r t C,Eek. Qtr U-., MAILING ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP i(3' n stc) LOUPE AO*, sre 331, •77 ,1 o, Cat. 4 a-a,3 PHONE NO. FAX NO. 5o3- Gos-3 516 , 1/4.03 -66-3-5-761— "-When (a53-5"-When the owner and the applicant are different people,the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written , authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written author:aeon with this application. PROPOSAL SUMMARY(Please be specific) APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT ALL OF THE REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS AS DESCRIBED IN THE "BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS"INFORMATION SHEET. is\curpin\masters\land use applications\land use permit app.doc THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • If the application is granted,the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. ® All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true;and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application,map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application,including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s). SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. 67/6V/3 per's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date V/424e6k64-1-P Peer , trOUlu 1 5-XP/.1 Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date .......N, r4 77''N 1,1 r:n R -Ley Lt,"1 i L.:,,,,...., ,..� Elite Care minor lot partition MAY 2013 t �qt Narrative e s 12353 SW Grant Ave P1"� '`v'' 9'` e �A'.aa.cP k 1 The proposed lot partition is creating two new lots under the same ownership. There are no proposed new buildings. The two parcels will remain being used in the as it is being used currently.No proposed additional development is being proposed nor do we have any plans adding additional structures. The propose of this lot partition is only because of financing requirements that the bank has asked us to partition the existing building at the 500 year flood plan. Existing site: Currently there is an existing building that is used as a residential care facility and that was new construction on 2005. There was a conditional use peunits approved in 2005 and has been in business since 2005. There is also a historic barn on site. Proposed: The proposed lot partition will split this lot into two new lots at the west boarder of the parking area. This is to have the new proposed parcel 1 existing building our of the 500 year flood plan. The proposed parcel 2 will have the historic barn and remain the same. The code section addressed in the application: • 18.330.050.B.15 — Group Living Conditional Requirements • 18.390.040.2.3 —Impact Study o Done • 18.420.050—Approval Criteria • 18.510— Setbacks in Table 18.510.2 for R-4.5 zone (5 foot setback from the existing buildings to the new property line) and accessory structures in 18.510.060 (barn must be at least 5 feet from the proposed property line). • 18.745.030 General Provisions and 040 Street Trees. • 18.790.030—Urban Forestry Plan We have also provided: • Service provider letter • Vicinity map • Proposed lot split from engineer that did engineering in the original development on 2005 Property -; Summary I permit Summary I Right if Way Permits I rnmmnnity I Rusinpccp� I I if-pH,I irpnaps I J-Ia7arris. I Platc I J;pnrhmgrkc I Frpinrpr I ,RD +. i L Property Owner Info Tax ID Number: 2s_142.Bpg.200g Tax Account Number: R462591 Site Address: 12353 SW GRANT ST Site City: Tigard Site ZIP: 97223 Owner Address: Owner City: PORTLAND Owner State: OR Owner ZIP: 97212 Acres: 2.62 Sq Ft: 114,127.2 Bldg SF: 12,636 Bldg Value: $3,209,640 Land Value: $640,000 Total Value: $3,849,640 Taxable Ass'd Value: $2,286,210 Sale Price: $0 Sale Date: Year Built: 0 District Info Municipality City Tigard Tigard Urban Sery Bndry: Yes Tigard Neighborhoods Name Link to Website Area 3 Area 3 Ne,9kborhond News Tigard Park District: Yes Water Service Water Service Tigard Water Service Area Phone Service Area Provider - - — __ ___ , _ _ ------, ' I .,* 16"0 '---= ' /- ----"-* \ I. 10'P •,.\c' %,,-0,-./--", 12";--NK-1:(2)—(1.96S)---,NBIK21 ::::: .20s:0c,,, ..-.1' / SP 7_0' CO .---------9,9-SQL_ 'I /------- (1 0 r___„., _0 0 / ' 101° 1 n 0 , "•--..„ 0 , 0 0 16"0 // \, '1'1' SA .- Sif, 6"AP ' -- - ( ' 0 26"UNK 0 ,J.-'/ ,:.r. --(..) - . -,,, .-,-, ••• / "---- 'I'C\ Aillillik. k / 1'&16"M 101.11" , „ \ - \ I 2"(2)ASH / / 1411 1610"AHio, ,,,4, Aro 40,4? . .....„,„ ,„ ,.:.. , "UNK(Th \...., sa E,-_,.. 12"M .. rHAW / 8(3)M c3z) o° 14 UNK 00010,1146 OAK 8"(6)HAW ' PARCEL 2 82 ..,, 6"M 1-L SA; 11 '' - • lofr''54 / IF ".," ., „.16"11NK 1I4A (5)14"M / k...-A1 C,,.. / / •0 '' 4.„4k 060 .:1 , 76,960 SO.FT. L, \ 8(7)HAW / 16"M 0 • 11,, 4"A-1,•;-: 4 ,,,P co2"0 • 06(2)0 ;- „.. 8"(14)HAN1 -2 2- N 901)0'00'W F-3' 110 /2).T6N,..,..?, :.‘,. ..., ,.. , ,G20/- .,„ ,,,, ,', 0 cy 8"A A.0 / / - VICINITY MAP . , . ,, - , , _ , WASH- 4114-- • '' X' • SA SA ..'''`44 '' /" . , KA SA SA SA 0 / 15'0 4'404- ', i,, ( ,-•'' ' s''' - ---- '0 —, - 1" 7-40y. .4p7 st, ---t , , ca2-) 0 ,„_ 12"IINK/ --- ..--1 - -s '\ ,,,/:°: , ,,,.-- GRAVY'\-,,,, ,/(S,*, ,,,,,'1510, / ' hr / 40,,, 0,7 0 12"M Oc) 706"C/, 7/ '', ,/ 0 'Ps., „ , •46',P,6 „,- .,,. • ,/, 6 48 30 E 36"A ---6' 9- „•./ 10,00 0 30.00' ,L) ,' • ' LEGEND: - - lo-co ,, , /(y, / / moo' ,,,,, ,,,,,,,', (.2)8"AsH t,, t:.,,,,,,,,,,;,•„-., —SI,— EXISTING SEWER - ,,,,,• ,c#61 ,K 11,' (2),8•A ,'•,, . /' '' / el'• --..‘„ HISTORIC 1 s .;''' ,'''N ;),1)'- ..,,,,• - , 120 r7,,,„ .,,' C' 1' *1 ''' / —ST— EXISTING STORM —V),— EXISTING WATER , ,.\ •,..,^, S 80130.00*E 5%00"S' _--//,, S / c.-•.-• / • EHSTING FENCE 874249 E GENERATOR: ...•-,,,i .--1. ...„,,I-----i-- , ------.77-----..:,7--------'''..-., - ....... , ,, ,,,Y,, ' ,, 7.56' . ' / EXISTING CONCRETE ODE WALK CB / ' ' ' - - -'.-.. _...-...-.,...,,- _ "g EXISMNG FIRE HYDRANT T.L. 2103 ---1,/ •/0,' ' /' , ' / 4,4/ 44111, Sa37143.-.2.2 36 E ' "" --, so,,, .A, ,, ..0,,, "4, \v./ --- ---C3 S 6911132911 E--'1:1••••-•:------:•-•;11--T-''1 WETLAND 1/SE''' - -, '56•Y //CB , ,./ . 4, . 0 EXISTING CATCH BASIN •,.-45•••-;- (15) EXISTING STORM MANHOLE , ---,„ S 5401'00"4 4001-r4; ,‘" . ,,,4...... PPRAIOITPN -''''' ----:"*./1 `-',.7/o.9-, //'• p EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE ( S 78.0411.ESHALLOW c/ .I" 0 SITE T.B.M.A,S NOTED / , S 312551"E _ 7.77' * EXISTING UGHT POLE 6,, .. 30FT. 157-3:11-/:-42-2,)-_;, ..1,.,••1111S•IFF.o . 18"F9 ,4'),.. ,'"/ 1 oa, EXISTING POWER POLE . „ ..Ec" 32-29',35',111(F 7/,/), / '., • . ,, 9 ‘1"; N 1421'00'W e EXISTING WATER VALVE r"•-•'''' 8.31' „C • 47A' 51:S o4r •‘..). 4 ,-77--....',"':.,'F,-,' :,`F] SLIDING /66//I''11:.1.111'ST:2/'''' - „,/411; -•-- EXISTING STREET SIGN ,9404.. „;,, , 11.. s .— , / ., .,-.---:: 4111; ' GA.51,Et.31'179'25E, LOS 2 ' 1N4.4 ' ...‘ HEIGHT=30' 1 64k, 4,107 SO FT. /1,FT/sis ,---,... ,,,,, , ,,0,,,,.. .„ ss I,. ••• qv/ , ,' N 3620 46-1111W"-,, 151 1 4, . AREA o -•'-'11.C. S. '4'/-X /"711,-"P", '// 15.99' ..... pikoli '5),•• . 5 'Si BLDG 1 HEIGHT=30' ,,' rfr,.- 4, *' 41p/y •//.: 11128737 26'52" s''zio.:,0.1411 4 4098 SQ FT. T.L. 1900 /P/' • t*. /.11/ ./ ,,../:'••41141fri.1,14. ••*;7/// ET.L. 1601 100 YR. FLOOD PLAIN EL. 155.1 , 500 YR. FLOOD PLAIN EL 156.1 . ; 1;6 / / //// ELEVATIONS TO NGVD 1929 , / •' / .*, 0-• . 01' , • 4., '''" `'`F•.,, # // 7 :> // ‘9. •:-.--.. ti_ T.L. 1800 `c. -..... -.... 1 / GRAPHIC SCALE . //' 0 15 30 60 1 INCH- SO FEET (' gym REVISION BY APPROVED DATE DRANN BY CHECKED JHH DATE SUBTITLE PROPOSED PARTITION PLAT V22842-2 JM -... ZTec ENGINEERS INC. TITLE "S.NV22842_PRE PLAT SCA12. 1"--30" FOR: ELITE CARE FACILITY SHEER CliECKED 3737 S.E. 8ONETH AVE., PORTLAND,235-8795OR. 97202 PH 12353 S.W. GRANT ST., TIGARD 1 FAX: (503) 233-7889 WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON PLOT DATE: 4-29-13 ZTEC CAD FILE: \V22842_PRE PLAT,dwg CleanWater\ Services Our roaunitincnt is clear. CWS File Number 13-000513 Service Provider Letter 13-000513 This form and the attached conditions will serve as your Service Provider Letter in accordance with Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (R&O 07-20). Jurisdiction: Tigard Review Type: No Impact Site Address 12353 SW Grant ST SPL Issue Date: April 16,2013 /Location: Tigard, OR 97223 SPL Expiration Date: April 16,2015 Applicant Information: Owner Information: Name Name Company NW VENTURES Company NW VENTURES 2401 NE MLK JR BLVD 2401 NE MLK JR BLVD Address Address PORTLAND OR PORTLAND OR Phone/Fax (503)740-6971 Phone/Fax (503)740-6971 E-mail: derrick.nwventures@yahoo.com E-mail: derrick.nwventures@yahoo.com Tax lot ID Development Activity 2S102BA02000 Partition Pre-Development Site Conditions: Post Development Site Conditions: Sensitive Area Present: n On-Site n Off-Site Sensitive Area Present: n On-Site n Off-Site Vegetated Corridor Width: 50 Vegetated Corridor Width: 50 Vegetated Corridor Condition: Marginal Enhancement of Remaining Vegetated Corridor Required: El Square Footage to be enhanced: 6,000 Encroachments into Pre-Development Vegetated Corridor: Type and location of Encroachment: Square Footage: None 0 Mitigation Requirements: Type/Location Sq. Ft./Ratio/Cost No Mitigation Required 0 0 Conditions Attached X❑ Development Figures Attached(1) ❑Planting Plan Attached ❑Geotech Report Required This Service Provider Letter does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered on your property. Page 1 of 4 13-000513 CWS File Number In order to comply with Clean Water Services water quality protection requirements the project must comply with the following conditions: 1. No structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, uncontained areas of hazardous materials as defined by Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, pet wastes, dumping of materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted within the sensitive area or Vegetated Corridor which may negatively impact water quality, except those allowed in R&O 07-20, Chapter 3. 2. Prior to any site clearing, grading or construction the Vegetated Corridor and water quality sensitive areas shall be surveyed, staked, and temporarily fenced per approved plan. During construction the Vegetated Corridor shall remain fenced and undisturbed except as allowed by R&O 07-20, Section 3.06.1 and per approved plans. 3. If there is any activity within the sensitive area, the applicant shall gain authorization for the project from the Oregon Department of State Lands(DSL)and US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The applicant shall provide Clean Water Services or its designee(appropriate city) with copies of all DSL and USACE project authorization permits. 4. An approved Oregon Department of Forestry Notification is required for one or more trees harvested for sale, trade, or barter, on any non-federal lands within the State of Oregon. 5. Appropriate Best Management Practices(BMP's)for Erosion Control, in accordance with Clean Water Services' Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual, shall be used prior to, during, and following earth disturbing activities. 6. Prior to construction, a Stormwater Connection Permit from Clean Water Services or its designee is required pursuant to Ordinance 27, Section 4.B. 7. Activities located within the 100-year floodplain shall comply with R&O 07-20, Section 5.10. 8. Removal of native,woody vegetation shall be limited to the greatest extent practicable. 9. Should final development plans differ significantly from those submitted for review by Clean Water Services,the applicant shall provide updated drawings, and if necessary, obtain a revised Service Provider Letter. SPECIAL CONDITIONS 10. The Vegetated Corridor width for sensitive areas within the project site shall be a minimum of 50 feet wide, as measured horizontally from the delineated boundary of the sensitive area. 11. For Vegetated Corridors up to 50 feet wide, the applicant shall enhance approximately 6,000 sf of Vegetated Corridor to meet or exceed good corridor condition as defined in R&O 07-20, Section 3.14.2,Table 3-3. 12. Prior to any site clearing, grading or construction, the applicant shall provide Clean Water Services with a Vegetated Corridor enhancement/restoration plan. Enhancement/restoration of the Vegetated Corridor shall be provided in accordance with R&O 07-20, Appendix A. 13. Prior to installation of plant materials, all invasive vegetation within the Vegetated Corridor shall be removed per methods described in Clean Water Services' Integrated Pest Management Guide, 2009. During removal of invasive vegetation care shall be taken to minimize impacts to existing native tree and shrub species. 14. Clean Water Services or the City shall be notified 72 hours prior to the start and completion of enhancement/restoration activities. Enhancement/restoration activities shall comply with the guidelines provided in Landscape Requirements(R&0 07-20, Appendix A). 15. Maintenance and monitoring requirements shall comply with R&O 07-20, Section 2.11.2. If at any time during the warranty period the landscaping falls below the 80%survival level,the owner shall reinstall all deficient planting at the next appropriate planting opportunity and the two year maintenance period shall begin again from the date of replanting. Page 2 of 4 • C1eanWater `'Services Our corn mfln,enl to clear. CWS F/e Number 13-000513 fi �•• // a Loh' T1�� // toe - � �� $E,�`�I r Co+o¢ / lJ trio. 1 / .o•ar.un is �� fl„)O �� .40:' , C S(-L 13-000AS 9 1 A� fit. I) Approved = i �` �� °"� 1, f/.,l��/ I! (��, s�e n Water ServIGBS r.I Foe.t-..1�fte/,).r,(@�,IrA1l.�v1E.� , 41. .,� �, Byre Date it 14li 3 w ra,- //• . : .a,wa,. /� F r(Aut,N i' I of 1 . i .,1 ,,, ,, , • ,i1,-,:i it % k I�I } • / / I.E4EdP 4s. +t� 'r • ate' + I '# ,r�+,' j ' —: /s'w,' \ );i sAeeec. �e .xr+1'/" ,• 0541•arlit MI TdT1tL 1IELoErfgr'Ep ,� / '// y/ C ,oe� — aa, l sa sf : ,., . ... --f / j� ,// .E,a„a� 4 / � . 4/P 3..... P. 1 )-*., / N, % �b , 1. ' i'' j'''w 4-PetaXI MASE. I,f6a/ �. .•L: IN kip R•_ \ / '74”-' J / 4 g.,47- = (o.oao SF `/ 0, . A j � OF £+Hfwce.. y; % / v, ^ fa MEET 0IST721cT DEaIS,T+, STI9NDN4RAS it1 4cii 1 . 1/ �p3 0o S5 �� ON S. y/ ;��r, ..•a (Aj nr14E fLANn) SHku. 6E etANTEIN. ,.�ppp R / 100 1R.FL000 I'LNN LL 155.1 14 4. �/ /° 500 M.EL000 PLAN El.156.1 y`=y;+ �!►”' "V. � s ELEVAINNS TO KW 19M ia \ CIAO" ..b \\��\ TI.IOW )/ OM/ . rt ZTec ENGINEERS, INC. "'" SITE LAYOUT n ,w..a 3737 5.E 8TH AVE.,PORTLAND,OR.87202 wv FOR: ELITE CARE FACILITY PHONE:(503)235-8795 12353 S.W. GRANT ST., TIGARD C1 FAX (503)233 7889 WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON .l[4 our,1-1.-,1 ZRC VD MC.\V11077e'1p Page 4 of 4 13-000513 CWS File Number 16. Performance assurances for the Vegetated Corridor shall comply with RB,O 07-20, Section 2.06.2. 17. For any developments which create multiple parcels or lots intended for separate ownership, Clean Water Services may require that the sensitive area and Vegetated Corridor be contained in a separate tract and subject to a""STORM SEWER, SURFACE WATER, DRAINAGE AND DETENTION EASEMENT OVER ITS ENTIRETY""to be granted to Clean Water Services. This Service Provider Letter is not valid unless CWS-approved site plan is attached. Please call (503) 681-3653 with any questions. A, Amber Wierck Environmental Plan Review Attachments(1) Page 3 of 4 Impact Study "Fanno Creek lot partition" Project Address: 12353 SW Grant Avenue, Tigard, OR 97223 Purpose The purpose of this impact study is to review existing public facilities and address any proposed modifications that will help mitigate the proportionate project impacts that will likely occur as a result of development. This lot partition will not to create any additional construction or development. This lot partition is being completed specifically as a result of the property owner financing. The two lots will remain under the same ownership and will function and stay the same. The existing assisted living facility and historical barn is all existing and will stay existing with no additional construction or impact to any private or public facilities on either of the two new lots. Transportation System There will be no impact to the transportation system due to no additional construction being proposed. Drainage Systems There will be no impact or proposed drainage system due to no additional construction being proposed. Sanitary Sewer Systems There will be no impact or proposed sanitary system due to no additional construction being proposed. Water Systems There will be no impact or proposed water system due to no additional construction being proposed. Noise Impacts There will be no additional noise impact to the area due to no additional construction being proposed. Parks System There will be no impact to surrounding parks due to no additional construction being proposed. Conditional Use Introduction Elite Care at Fanno Creek has a conditional use permit that was approved in 2005-2006. The existing site was constructed between 2006 and 2008, and has been in continuous operation since 2008. We are not proposing a new conditional use permit for any additional buildings. The proposed lot partition meets all requirements for the original conditional use. The only item that will change is that the eastside set back will be different, but the existing building still meets the new set back requirements. Open space, off-street parking, height, access, all other setbacks, and density will not change. Conditional Use Chapter 18.330 CONDITIONAL USE Sections: 18.330.010 Purpose 18.330.020 Approval Process 18.330.030 Approval Standards and Conditions of Approval 18.330.040 Additional Submission Requirements 18.330.050 Additional Development Standards for Conditional Use Types 18.330.010 Purpose Purpose.The purpose of this chapter is to provide standards and procedures under which a conditional use may be permitted,enlarged or altered if the site is appropriate and if other appropriate conditions of approval can be met.There are certain uses which due to the nature of the impacts on surrounding land uses and public facilities require a case-by-case review and analysis. 18.330.020 Approval Process A. Initial applications.A request for approval for a new conditional use shall be processed as a Type IIIHO procedure,as regulated by Chapter 18.390.050, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.330.030.A and subject to other requirements in this chapter. B. Major modification of approved or existing conditional use. 1.An applicant may request approval of modification to an approved plan by: a. Providing the Director with five copies of the proposed modified conditional use site plan;and b.A narrative addressing the proposed changes as listed in subsection B.2 below. Response:Please see project narrative 2.The Director shall determine that a major modification(s) has resulted if one or more of the changes listed below have been proposed: a. A change in land use; Response:No change to the existing land use is proposed. b. A 10% increase in dwelling unit density; Response: No change to dwelling density is being proposed. c.A change in the type and/or location of access ways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected; Response: No changes proposed d.An increase in the floor area proposed for non-residential use by more than 10%where previously specified; Response: No changes proposed e.A reduction of more than 10%of the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space; Response: There is a reduction in open space on a lot area standpoint. The usable open space is not being reduced more than 10%. The open space used by residents will not change due to both new lots will be under the same ownership and will not change in its function. f.A reduction of specified setback requirements by more than 20%;Conditional Use 18.330-2 Code Update: 10/09 Response: There is a reduction in side setback to the east property line. No reduction in all other setbacks. The new eastern set back meets code requirements g.An elimination of project amenities by more than 10%where previously specified provided such as: (1) Recreational facilities; (2)Screening;or (3) Landscaping provisions;and Response:no proposed changes h.A 10%increase in the approved density; Response:no proposed changes 3. Upon the Director determining that the proposed modification to the conditional use plan is a major modification,the applicant shall submit a new application in accordance with Section 18.390.050. C. Minor modification of approved or existing conditional use. 1.Any modification which is not within the description of a major modification as provided in Subsection B above shall be considered a minor modification. 2.An applicant may request approval of a minor modification by means of a Type I procedure,as regulated by Section 18.390.030, using approval criteria in Subsection C.3 below. 3.A minor modification shall be approved, approved with conditions, or denied following the Director's review based on the findings that: a.The proposed development is in compliance with all applicable requirements of this title;and b.The modification is not a major modification as defined in Subsection A above. Response: The proposed lot partition should have no effect on the conditional use permit other than one side set back which meets the set back requirement of code requirements. D. Phased development approval.As part of the approval process,the Hearings Officer shall approve a time schedule for developing a site in phases over a period of time of one year, but in no case shall the total time period for all phases be greater than three years without reapplying for conditional use review.The criteria for approving a phased conditional use review proposal is that all of the following are satisfied: 1.The public facilities shall be constructed in conjunction with or prior to each phase. 2.The development and occupancy of any phase shall not be dependent on the use of temporary public facilities. A temporary public facility is any facility not constructed to the applicable City or district standard. 3.The phased development shall not result in requiring the City or other property owners to construct public facilities that were required as part of the approved development proposal. E.Approval period. Conditional use approval by the Hearings Officer shall be effective for a period of 1-1/2 years from the date of approval.The conditional use approval by the Hearings Officer shall lapse if: 1.Substantial construction of the approved plan has not begun within a 1-1/2 year period;orConditional Use 18.330-3 Code Update: 10/09 2. Construction on the site is a departure from the approved plan. (Ord. 09-13) Response:No phases are being proposed 18.330.050 Additional Development Standards for Conditional Use Types A. Concurrent variance application(s).A conditional use permit shall not grant variances to the regulations otherwise prescribed by this title.A variance application(s) may be filed in conjunction with the conditional use application and both applications may be heard at the same hearing. B.Additional development standards.The additional dimensional requirements and approval standards for conditional use are as follows: b. Distance shall be measured in a straight line,without regard to intervening structures, objects or roads, from the closest point of the structure or portion of structure containing the use,to the closest portion of the residential zone or property line upon which a use specified in paragraph (a)above is listed; 15. Group Living: a. Minimum lot size shall be 5,000 square feet; Response:New proposed lot will be larger than 5,000 square feet c. Minimum setbacks shall be those in the applicable zone; Response:New proposed lot will meet applicable zoning setbacks d. Height limitation shall be that in the applicable zone; Response: New proposed lot will meet height limits e. Compliance with all state requirements shall be required;and Response:New proposed lot will meet all state requirements f. Off-street parking shall be in accordance with Chapter 18.765. Response: The new proposed lot will meet all off-street parking requirements as outlined in Chapter 18.765 Group living of 1.0/room and 1.0/2.5 beds. Currently, the existing project has 17 parking spaces and a bed count of 30. Introduction The proposed lot split meets all development standards of this code section. The only change to the existing site is the new proposed lot line. This only affects the side setbacks for the east property line of the existing building. The existing building on the property currently meets the zoning set back requirement. Chapter 18.510 RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Sections: 18.510.010 Purpose 18.510.020 List of Zoning Districts 18.510.030 Uses 18.510.040 Minimum and Maximum Densities 18.510.050 Development Standards 18.510.060 Accessory Structures 18.510.010 Purpose A.Preserve neighborhood livability. One of the major purposes of the regulations governing development in residential zoning districts is to protect the livability of existing and future residential neighborhoods,by encouraging primarily residential development with compatible nonresidential development— schools, churches,parks and recreation facilities, day care centers,neighborhood commercial uses and other services—at appropriate locations and at an appropriate scale. B. Encourage construction of affordable housing.Another purpose of these regulations is to create the environment in which construction of a full range of owner-occupied and rental housing at affordable prices is encouraged. This can be accomplished by providing residential zoning districts of varying densities and developing flexible design and development standards to encourage innovation and reduce housing costs. 18.510.020 List of Zoning Districts D.R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single- family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. R-4 Low-Density Residential District Minimum Lot Size 7,500 sq.ft. Average Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. Minimum Setbacks Front yard 20 ft Side facing street on corner&through lots 15 ft. Side yard 5 ft. Rear yard 15 ft --t Distance between property line and front of garage 20 ft. Maximum Height 30 ft. Response: Both Proposed Parcels meet the approval criteria and the zoning requirements. The new proposed lot to the west with existing building(parcel 1) Minimum Lot Size 30,138 sq ft Average Minimum Lot Width 150 ft Minimum Setbacks Front yard 36 ft Side facing street on corner& through lots 15 ft. Side yard 10 ft. Rear yard 15 ft Distance between property line and front of 60 ft. garage Maximum Height 30 ft. Parcel 2: Parcel two will not have any buildings on site. Therefore there are no challenges to the lot requirements. 18.510.040 Minimum and Maximum Densities A.Purpose.The purpose of this section is to establish minimum and maximum densities in each residential zoning district. To ensure the quality and density of development envisioned,the maximum density establishes the ceiling for development in each zoning district based on minimum lot size. To ensure that property develops at or near the density envisioned for the zone,the minimum density for each zoning district has been established at 80%of maximum density. B. Calculating minimum and maximum densities. The calculation of minimum and maximum densities is governed by the formulas in Chapter 18.715,Density Computations. C.Adjustments. Applicants may request an adjustment when,because of the size of the site or other constraint, it is not possible to accommodate the proportional minimum density as required by Section 18.715.020.0 and still comply with all of the development standards in the underlying zoning district,as contained in Table 18.510.2 below. Such an adjustment may be granted by means of a Type].procedure, as governed by Chapter 18.390,using approval criteria in Section 18.370.020.C.2. Response: There is no change to density with this application, and the project currently meets all density minimums. 18.510.050 Development Standards A. Compliance required.All development must comply with: 1. All of the applicable development standards contained in the underlying zoning district, except where the applicant has obtained variances or adjustments in accordance with Chapters 18.370; 2.All other applicable standards and requirements contained in this title. B. Development standards. Development standards in residential zoning districts are contained in Table 18.510.2. Response:The proposed lot split meets all development standards for the R-4 zoning. Introduction:The proposed development meets this code section requirement. The proposed --� development will not be adding any trees or buffering plants. Elite Care has a full time employee that is responsible for grooming and keeping all plants healthy. Chapter 18.745 LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING Sections: 18.745.010 Purpose 18.745.020 Applicability 18.745.030 General Provisions 18.745.040 Street Trees 18.745.010 Purpose A. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish standards for landscaping, buffering, and Screening of land use within Tigard in order to enhance the aesthetic environmental quality of the City: 1. By protecting existing street trees and requiring the planting of street trees in new developments; 2. By using plant materials as a unifying element; 3. By using planting materials to define spaces and articulate the uses of specific areas; and 4. By using trees and other landscaping materials to mitigate the effects of the sun, wind, noise and lack of privacy by the provision of buffering and screening. 18.745.020 Applicability A. Applicability. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, remodeling of existing structures where the landscaping is nonconforming (Section18.760.040.C), and to a change of use which results in the need for increased on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. B. When site development review does not apply. Where the provisions of Chapter 18.360, its Development Review, do not apply, the Director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny a plan submitted under the provisions of this chapter by means of a Type I procedure, as governed bySection 18.390.030, using the applicable standards in this chapter. C. Site plan requirements. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. 18.745.030 General Provisions A. Obligation to maintain. Unless otherwise provided by the lease agreement,the owner, tenant and his agent, if any, shall be jointly and severally responsible for the maintenance of all landscaping and screening which shall be maintained in good condition so as to present a healthy, neat and orderly appearance, shall be replaced or repaired as necessary, and shall be kept free from refuse and debris. B. Pruning required. All plant growth in landscaped areas of developments shall be controlled by pruning, trimming or otherwise so that: Landscaping and Screening 18.745-2 Code Update: 03/10 1. It will not interfere with the maintenance or repair of any public utility; 2. It will not restrict pedestrian or vehicular access; and 3. It will not constitute a traffic hazard because of reduced visibility. C. Installation requirements. The installation of all landscaping shall be as follows: 1. All landscaping shall be installed according to accepted planting procedures; 2. The plant materials shall be of high grade, and shall meet the size and grading standards of the American Standards for Nurberg Stock(ANSI Z60, 1-1986, and any future revisions); and 3. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the provisions of this title. D. Certificate of occupancy. Certificates of occupancy shall not be issued unless the landscaping requirements have been met or other arrangements have been made and approved by the City such as the posting of a bond. E. Protection of existing vegetation. Existing vegetation on a site shall be protected as much as possible: 1. The developer shall provide methods for the protection of existing vegetation to remain during the construction process; and 2. The plants to be saved shall be noted on the landscape plans (e.g., areas not to be disturbed can be fenced, as in snow fencing which can be placed around individual trees). F. Care of landscaping along public rights-of-way. Appropriate methods for the care and maintenance of street trees and landscaping materials shall be provided by the owner of the property abutting the rights-of-way unless otherwise required for emergency conditions and the safety of the general public. G. Conditions of approval of existing vegetation. The review procedures and standards for required landscaping and screening shall be specified in the conditions of approval during development review and in no instance shall be less than that required for conventional development. g. On-premises utilities (e.g., water and gas meters) shall not be installed within existing treewell areas; h. Street trees shall not be planted closer than 20 feet to light standards; i. New light standards shall not be positioned closer than 20 feet to existing street trees except when public safety dictates, then they may be positioned no closer than 10 feet; j. Where there are overhead power lines, the street tree species selected shall be of a type which, at full maturity, will not interfere with the lines; k. Trees shall not be planted within two feet from the face of the curb; and 1. Trees shall not be planted within two feet of any pelinanent hard surface paving or walkway: (1) Space between the tree and the hard surface may be covered by a nonpeunanent hard surface such as grates, bricks on sand, paver blocks and cobblestones; and (2) Sidewalk cuts in concrete for tree planting shall be at least four by four feet to allow for air and water into the root area.Landscaping and Screening 18.745-4 Code Update: 03/10 D. Pruning requirements. Trees, as they grow, shall be pruned to provide at least eight feet of clearance above sidewalks and 13 feet above local street, 15 feet above collector street, and 18 feet above arterial street roadway surfaces. E. Cut and fill around existing trees. Existing trees may be used as street trees if no cutting or filling takes place within the drip-line of the tree unless an adjustment is approved by the Director by means of a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030, using approval criteria in Section 18.370.020.C.4.a. F. Replacement of street trees. Existing street trees removed by development projects or other construction shall be replaced by the developer with those types of trees approved by the Director. The replacement trees shall be of a size and species similar to the trees that are being removed unless lesser sized alternatives are approved by the Director. G. Granting of adjustments. Adjustments to the street tree requirements may be granted by the Director by means of a Type I procedure, as regulated in Section 18.390.030, using approval criteria in Section 18.370.020.C.6.b. H. Location of trees near signalized intersections. The Director may allow trees closer to specified intersections which are signalized, provided the provisions of Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance, are satisfied. (Ord. 09-13) ..� Response:Parcel 1 has existing street trees that meet the requirements of this code section. Parcel 2 does not have street trees. We are not proposing street trees because there is no development being proposed. Urban Forestry Plan for: Grant Elite Care 28 MLP2013-00002 c �F Submitted by the team of: Information for Todd Prager&Associates: Afge Todd Prager ISA Certified Arborist WE-6723A y 4 601 Atwater Road 0 Lake Oswego, Oregon 97034 www.toddprager.com Tocki Prager & Associates L:LC Phone I 971.295.4835 Email I todd@toddprager.com Information for Morgan Holen&Associates: Morgan Holen ISA Certified Arborist PN-6145A ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified Holen I (Olen 3 Monroe Parkway, Suite P 220 —C�— AJJOCIAT ,/ Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035 Phone I 971.409.9354 Email ( morgan.holen c[comcast.net May 20,2013 Urban Forestry Plan—Supplemental Report Project Summary This Urban Forestry Plan is for a Minor Land Partition in an 4.5 zoning district at 12353 SW Grant Ave in Tigard,Oregon.The existing development is being partitioned into two lots,and no additional development is planned at this time.Lot 1 consists of a developed residential care facility and lot 2 is a natural area with a barn and greenhouse.No trees are proposed for removal at this time. Lot 1 is 30,138 sq.ft.and has 4%effective tree canopy.The minimum required effective tree canopy for lot 1 is 15%,so an additional 3,265 sq.ft.of new tree canopy or a tree canopy fee in lieu of$9,632 is required to meet City of Tigard standards for lot 1.Both options are presented in this report. Lot 2 is 76,960 sq.ft.and has 190%effective tree canopy.The minimum required effective tree canopy for lot 2 is 15%,so no tree canopy fee in lieu is required for lot 2. The overall development site is 107,098 sq.ft and has 138%effective tree canopy(140%if additional new planting option is selected).The minimum required effective tree canopy for the overall development site is 40%,so no tree canopy fee in lieu is required for the overall development site. Attached is the Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan and Tree Canopy Site Plan as required by Section 10 of the Urban Forestry Manual.The plans are combined since no development is proposed at this time. Specifications Tree Protection Fencing Specifications:Not applicable because no development is planned at this time. Tree Preservation Specifications:Not applicable because no development is planned at this time. Stand Preservation Specifications:Not applicable because no development is planned at this time. Soil Characteristics and Specifications for Improvement: The soils for eligible trees in lot 1 consist of well drained,amended top soils that were installed with the previous development.No soil amendments are necessary at this time. The soils for lot 2 consist of native soils that support an existing stand of primarily native trees.The trees appear to be healthy and sustainable,and no soil amendments are necessary at this time. Urban Forestry Plan—Supplemental Report Tree Planting Specifications:If new trees are planted to meet the effective canopy requirements,they shall conform to the City of Tigard design standards and the American Nursery Standards ANS 1260.1.They shall be planted in accordance with standards adopted by the Oregon Landscape Contractors Board(OLCB)and meet the requirements of the American Association of Nurserymen(AAN)for nursery stock(ANSI Z60.2)for Grade No.1 or better.Double stake all trees. Stand Planting Specifications:Not applicable because no trees are proposed for planting at this time. Existing Tree Inventory s Tree# Genus sp./ DBH Canopy Open or ' Heritage Cond. Pres. Preserve? Comments ' Common (ft2) Stand Grown Tree? Rating Rating 1 Prunus sp. 8 in. 113 Open N 1 1 Y Not eligible for canopy Edible plum I credit due to condition.i 2 Prunus.p. 12 in. 314 Open , N 2 2 Y Edible cherry Existing Stand Inventory Stand# Genus sp./ Avg.DBH 1 Avg.Cond. Overall Stand Total Canopy Comments Common of Dominant Rating 1 Pres.Rating Canopy Preserved Genus sp./ Avg.DBH 2 Avg.Cond. (ft2) (ft2) Common of 2d Rating 2 Genus sp./ Avg.DBH 3 Avg.Cond. Common of 3.1 Rating 3 1 Acermarraph.illum 14 in. 2 2 72,710 72,710 ' Viable stand,recently Btgleaff_maPle restored with prior Quercusgarryana11 in. 2 development. Oregon white oak Fraxznus/cattalo 1 11 in. 2 Oregon ash �,.�„ Urban Forestry Plan—Supplemental Report Planted Tree Inventory Tree# Genus _ ,..... . P_.... sp./ (Decid.)__ �, , Caliper or Mature Mature Available Comments Common • Height Canopy Spread 1 Canopy ; Soil Volume ,,,,... (EverEeen) (ft) Area(ft2) (ft3) 1 ,Acerpalmatum 2 in. 20 314 , 1000+ -Recentlyplanted street tree 'Bloodgood' 1 = in good condition Bloodgood Japansese -mature canopy data from MapleUniversity<of Florida:' http//c dtti ita nfl cdu!t�i009 ' 2 'Acerpalmatum 2 in. 20 314 1000+ 'Bloodgood Bloodgood Japans ese Maple ' 3 Acerpalmatum 2 in. 20 314 1000+ 'Bloodgood' , �� € Bloodgood Japansese ' Ma le (. ...... 4 Acerpalmatum ! 2 in. 20 314 , 855 'Bloodgood' Bloodgood Japansese Ma le .. ..._. 5 •= Fraxinur()rims ''1.5 in.mut. 25 ' 491 1000+ Op planting lanting if tree Flowering Ash f canopy fee in lieu option is S not selected 6 Cercidiphy//um japonicum 1.5 in.min. 40 1256 1000+ " Katsura 7 Ceradiphyllum japonicum 1.5 m.min. 40 , 1256 1000+ Katsura 8 Acerpalmatum 1.5 in.mm. 20 314 519 'Bloodgood' Bloodgood Japansese Maple ..___._.. • Urban Forestry Plan-Supplemental Report Planted Stand Inventory Not applicable because no stands of trees are proposed for planting at this time. Effective Tree Canopy Cover Summary *Lot or Lot or Tract 2x Canopy 2x Canopy 1.25x Mature Mature 1.25x Mature ' Total Canopy Effective Tract# Area(ft2) Area(ft2)of € Area(ft2)of Canopy Canopy Canopy Area(ft2)per `: Canopy (exclude Preserved Preserved Area(ft2)of Area(ft2)of Area(ft2)of lot or tract (Canopy Area . streets) Trees Stands Native Non-Native Planted - (w/cond.and (w/cond.and Planted Planted Stands Lot or Tract pres.>_2) pres.>_2) Trees Trees Area) 1-w/o trees . 30,138 0 " 0 0 1;256 0 1,256 4°'o 5to8 1-w/trees 5 30,138 0 0 0 4,573 0 4,573 15% to 8 ^—...., 2 76,960 628 145 420 0 0 i 0 146,048 190°'o Total-w/o 107,098 628 145,420 0 1,256 0 147,307 138% o trees 5 to 8 Total-w/X , 107,098 628 1 145,420 0 4,573 -To 149,993 140°%; trees 5to8,' *Note:effective tree canopy cover is required to be calculated on a lot/tract by lot/tract basis only in the R-1,R-2,R-3.5,R-4.5 and R-7 districts. The standard percentage of effective tree canopy cover for each lot or tract in the R-1,R-2,R-3.5,R-4.5 and R-7 districts shall be at least 15 percent. The standard percentage of effective tree canopy cover for the overall development site shall be at least: i. 40%for R-1,R-2,R-3.5,R-4.5 and R-7districts,except for schools(18.130.050(J)); ii. 33%for R-12,R-25,R-40,C-N,C-C,C-G,C-P,MUE,MUE-1,MUE-2,MUC,MUR and I-P districts,except for schools (18.130.050(J));and iii. 25%for MU-CBD,MUC-1,I-L and I-H districts,and for schools(18.130.050(J))in all districts. Urban Forestry Plan—Supplemental Report Tree Canopy Fee Calculation (if applicable) Is the percentage of effective tree canopy cover less than the applicable standard percentage for the overall development?Effective tree canopy cover for overall development site is met. Is the percentage of effective tree canopy cover less than 15% for any individual lot or tract in the R-1,R-2,R-3.5,R-4.5 and R-7 districts? If trees 5, 6, 7, and 8 are not planted,the effective tree canopy cover for lot 1 would be less than 15%. The required tree canopy fee would be$9,632 as shown in the calculations below. 1. Find the required ft2 of tree canopy for the deficient lot or tract: (lot or tract area) x 15%. 4,521 sq. ft. 2. Find the ft'of tree canopy the lot or tract is short: (required ft2 of tree canopy from 1 above) - (proposed ft2 of tree canopy). 3,265 sq. ft. 3. Find the $value of tree canopy: (PNW-ISA wholesale median cost for a 3" deciduous tree in the Willamette Valley) ± 59. $2.95 4. Find the required tree canopy fee: (amount of ft2 of tree canopy from 2 above) x (the $ value of tree canopy from 3 above). --� $9,632 Signature of Approval I hereby attest that, to the best of my knowledge: 1. The attached Tree Preservation and Removal site plan meets all of the requirements in Section 10,Part 1 of the Urban Forestry Manual; 2. The attached Tree Canopy site plan meets all of the requirements in Section 10,Part 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual;and 3. The Supplemental Report meets all of the requirements in Section 10, Part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual. f 4.62„. 03/ Todd Prager Morga . n — a \ a 0 0 6,,, - / SITE ' ip / 441PIIIV Y " ,,,,0 ip a:,hrA �I s O �4 '/�F, VICINITY MAP r VI Q K �g 4‘ "" 0 . �. .:, IQ. ' / Q' �r 0 LEGEND: r a ra / r,-am �r'''11‘414;4,r:= nye .- , % / ,/ ..........3, / rree w i, u r /� j Mro DERE 34161.� Q. h • SEr,<.,raM / �r -o- EASTIE EKE Ea • New new rree,rte eeM7 aa.,,rcos !*4444111(414 BEE I n �. 1zn r.,.im rree ue � 1,men ��4t/ 10E re.FLOOD PLAIN¢.1551, 5W M-R�RAIN EL 1561 N EIEVATONS r0 NM 1929 i'L6 /rra 1; d �iy ' in M �mm rras e e T �, d4,,' S e New 2/ ;r .,.. r.�MO .. ne,P e.s x,: an,r ry a.. w.a:,,,a'.„a NEW \\\ /// . Two > E EA.T.z`An D 0 13 30 63 � . � ' vR ZTec ENGINEERS, INC. ". PROPOSED PARTITION PLATpz.z Pwe Pur �a FOR: ELITE CARE FACILITY — '—ao 3737 5.E.8TH AVE.,PORTLAND,OR.97202 = " PHONE(503)235-8795 12353 S.W. GRANT ST., TIGARD FAX (503)233-7889 WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON ,a.....:,:m _2023 xaT PEE•-23-13 A . ) 10"p Y / 16 0 / / 16"A 10"P 10'R 6Q .� Q 374 A6 ©l.d t6"0 h'`... :1,11, r / 'It,s.7. CAP (_ �K , SITE Sw Ci--, .K I .sem if twds /` d 1,i M ,,,i,„,.. � ' `1T�9 ,�Qr' / ,,,•4.„...,. q! 8'Uf,F '6,M JM i,"(2)ASH 10 ASH 5 / 410*44. 4s* �� 16'0 Q ' ,F, `. ., I► 6"4A / 16"UNKLi ,11 yK o .,1010"A S1B"HAW 10"0 $'l.;M P .� 2MZ ,M: �4 UNK 001111,4 B"(6)HAWOD `�' PARCEL 2 14"(ri)M o/ 70' .j\ \18"UNK '. AREA1 IC •, 16"UNK 16"M c• 6 I /Sq OF ., 9„- 16 1 /6960 SO FT (, d'M g � � � 8"(2wA,', .� 6L7 Q ` 4 ` .4„ ado \ `•-T"2 : ,.,,.b;210 8('.,1,A' t„1 r'roo p \N 90'00'00'W �� / �Q� \ t„�/•1 �o.4 0.65' °, `' 18"0 / !4� f _ (9)6"A RPE SANITARY AC. LDRJ 'y 0 0.,RA ' TARONK;VGALLT VICINITY MAP .BB 4�9 2 '` ( sq--------- --;SA-40 — SA 5A SA SA 4•1,* '• // 18.0 16"0�C,)- .,� /(/// CO r X 3; 16.0 � 30"0 ��/ WETLANI y5 � `F� 10A �7 �� / BOUNDAR ,�® 9�� ,. / ©12"M ilot, j i [�, - 5�// 30.00' 30 W"E QA �9 / T � I, �/ 0 LEGEND: S30DODO E Stand#1 /CS / 10"C0 20.00' —SA EXISTING SEMER , 58 HISTORIC y '•a� //J 3 / / —ST— DOSING STORM _______,„„s1^ BARN ;. r� / / -WY DOSING WATER S/ .30.00; 6.40' 0 " EXISTING FENCE 70' N 6742'756' Kr GENERATOR , SiS ,, rP r. CB♦ / EASING CONCRETE SIDEWALK 96 �'� S 782238 - 34 / EASING FIRE HYDRANT T.L. 2103 '6r',A y '''''-se-,:''' '• /' •Y/ 4�°�.s,0'.,. E - p ' °1 `�: 5 p EXISTING CATCH BASH rD ``'1 1: / ® EIDSING sropsi MANHOLE / • PARTITION LINE / S 54'01'00'E y 6.43' ir',AAL F 0 m EASING SANTARY MANHOLE 8 / Tfee#1 - 273553^ 2 /� 4 • SITE T.B.Y.AS NOTED / III PARCEL 1 -� � �*�° • S 312551'E ARI 157x' u 1.77' # EASING UGHT POLE � ,T7/ c,. 3o,t38 Tfee#2 i+f#; P LS, N1421'00W e EASING WATER VALVE or E!I3O ' \i 6 S 54311 E / 5`107 SO.FT. Ff', \ O/ N;0AR' ExistingSofTrees New , 4 Tree#8 1/ o • FF Tree#7 `�' \_r''y6. ® 35j / ® /SIS / A.C. / ..p, ''--- 014 BLDG.1 / ✓ ' / Existing Open Grown Trees HEIGHT=30' / `�* , N6j, � AREA= ,��/� �� N 8326'52"E J6)0 n nno S0.FT. h. / i 12.77 T.L. 1601 /: New ip / N. T.L. 1900 ,9j �� Tree#6 �6... 1614 f'Mpen-•il 100 YR. FLOOD PLAIN EL. 155.1 , IneligibleExistingOpen 4g• 1,9r, ,/ 500 1R. FLOOD PLAIN EL. 156.1 � Grown Trees New /7 ELEVATIONS TO NGVD 1929 ,L,, Tree#1 /// o dye eV<• 1 :` / %. III Newly Planted Trees �}, reel #5 / New '''944, I hereby attest that,to the best of my knowledge: i',, ti4P, Tree.#2./// 0 1.This Tree Preservation and Removal site plan meets all of the requirements in Section 10,Part 1 of the Urban Forestry Manual;and ;� � . 2.This Tree Canopy site plan meets all of the requirements in Section 10,Part 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual. \ T.L. 1800 i 4j 4. ,� /Tree#3 b' �G� 70 New //' / GRAPHIC SCALE Tree#4/ // 4 Todd Prager,Cert.Arborist ISA WE-6723A 0 15 30 60 / IJ�.PP -�y�.� I S / �'� , 7r t (IN YEW) '0,,,..... / B `U 1 RICH- 90 MT Morgan Nolen,Cert.Arborist ISA PN-6145A, . /7// '/ �' Tr-ee Risk Assessment Qualified SYY REVISION BY APPROVED DATE DRANK BY DATE 91787777E ME NO.: JHHV22842-2 LCHECKED xcR. JM .ZTec ENGINEERS, INCPROPOSED PARTITION PLAT EQi2282_PRE PLAT — CHECKED 3737 S.E. 8TH AVE., PORTLAND, OR. 97202 FOR: ELITE CARE FACILITY ' =30' PHONE: (503) 235-8795 12353 S.W. GRANT ST., TIGARD 1 FAX: (503) 233-7889 WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON `Marked up by Todd Prager on 5/20/2013 PLOT DATE: 4-29-13 ZTEC CAD FILE: \V22842_PRE PLAT.dwg --� Introduction: The provided site plan has the existing trees on the two proposed site. The requirements in the Urban Forestry manual state that you need to have 15% of each lot with canopy cover and the entire site 50% canopy cover. Parcel 1:Has almost no tree canopy cover. There are 4 street trees and 6 small trees in planter boxes. We will not meet the 15% canopy cover. The proposed lot will be 30,138 sq.ft. 15% of that is 4520 sq ft of canopy cover. We plan on paying the fee $2.95 per sq.ft. of needed canopy cover. Parcel 2: The parcel is covered by over 40 healthy mature trees that are native trees that we can calculate twice the canopy cover. This will meet the 15% and 50% of the entire site canopy cover requirements. Note: we plan on getting a calculation of the existing canopy calculation for the existing trees on parcel 1. We project a needed canopy cover of 3000 sqft. Which would be a fee of approximately 3000 X 2.95=$8850 City of Tigard Urban Forestry Manual Part 2. Urban Forestry Plan—Tree Canopy Site Plan Requirements: A. The plan shall be standard size D (24" x 36"), a reduced ledger size (11" x 17") and PDF foiniat, and include all items in part 2.B-O below. Alternate sheet sizes may be allowed if approved by the city manager or designee. B. Date of drawing or last revision. C. North arrow. D. Bar scale as follows (unless otherwise approved by the city manager or designee): 1. less than 1.0 acres: 1" = 10' 2. 1.0 - 5.0 acres: 1" =20' 3. 5.0—20.0 acres: 1" = 50' 4. Over 20.0 acres: 1" = 100'. E. Site address or assessor's parcel number. F. The location of proposed property lines. G. The location of proposed building footprints, utilities and irrigation, streets and other paved areas. H. The trunk locations, driplines and assigned numbers for trees to be preserved in parts 1.J and 1.K. Each tree on both the tree preservation and removal site plan and tree canopy site plan shall be assigned the same number on both plans. I. The dripline locations of stand grown trees proposed for preservation greater than or equal to 6 inch DBH that foini a contiguous tree canopy. The dripline may be delineated at the outer edge of the stand. Each stand shall be assigned a number. Each stand on both the tree preservation and removal site plan and tree canopy site plan shall be assigned the same number on both plans. J. The location of existing or potential areas of tree growth limiting soils due to compaction, drainage, fertility, pH, contamination or other factors. K. Methods for improving areas of tree growth limiting soils if tree planting is proposed in those locations. L. The location, species, caliper(in inches for deciduous) or height (in feet for evergreen), assigned numbers and depiction of the mature tree canopy (in feet as identified on any of the tree lists in the Urban Forestry Manual or by the city manager or designee) for all trees to be planted and maintained as open grown trees. The minimum size for all trees planted and maintained as open grown trees is 1 % inch caliper for deciduous or 6 feet in height for evergreen. Open grown trees shall be selected from any of the tree lists in the Urban Forestry Manual (except the nuisance tree list) unless otherwise approved by the city manager or designee. If an open grown tree approved for planting is not identified on any of the tree lists in the Urban Forestry Manual, then the project arborist or landscape architect shall determine the average mature tree canopy spread using available scientific literature for review and approval by the city manager or designee. The city manager or designee may consider trees less than 6 inch DBH as equivalent to newly planted trees if they meet all applicable species, size, condition and location requirements in this section. Overall, the selection of open grown trees shall result in a reasonable amount of diversity for the site. Open grown trees shall be located as follows: 1. Trees categorized as small stature on any of the tree lists in the Urban Forestry Manual or by the city manager or designee shall be spaced no closer than 15 feet on center from other newly planted or existing trees and 10 feet from the face of habitable buildings. The setback from the face of habitable buildings may be reduced if approved by the city manager or designee; 2. Trees categorized as medium stature on any of the tree lists in the Urban Forestry Manual or by the city manager or designee shall be spaced no closer than 20 feet on center from other newly planted or existing trees and 15 feet from the face of habitable buildings. The setback from the face of habitable buildings may be reduced if approved by the city manager or designee; 3. Trees categorized as large stature on any of the tree lists in the Urban Forestry Manual or by the city manager or designee shall be spaced no closer than 30 feet on center from other newly planted or existing trees and 20 feet from the face of habitable buildings. The setback from the face of habitable buildings may be reduced if approved by the city manager or designee; See Appendix 6 for Nuisance Tree List 4. Trees determined by the city manager or designee to have a mature spread of less than 20 feet shall be considered small stature, and shall be spaced no closer than 15 feet on center from other newly planted or existing trees and 10 feet from the face of habitable buildings. The setback from the face of habitable buildings may be reduced if approved by the city manager or designee; 5. Trees categorized as small stature on any of the tree lists in the Urban Forestry Manual or by the city manager or designee shall not be planted with the center of their trunks closer than 2 feet from any hard surface paving; 6. Trees categorized as medium stature on any of the tree lists in the Urban Forestry Manual or by the city manager or designee shall not be planted with the center of their trunks closer than 2 feet from any hard surface paving; 7. Trees categorized as large stature on any of the tree lists in the Urban Forestry Manual or by the city manager or designee shall not be planted with the center of their trunks closer than 3 feet from any hard surface paving; 8. Where there are overhead utility lines, the tree species selected shall be of a type which, at full maturity, will not interfere with the lines; and 9. Where there is existing mature tree canopy or other areas with significant shade, the species selected shall be an understory tree.according to available scientific literature. However, understory trees shall only be planted when the planting of non-understory trees is precluded due to site constraints. M. The location, species, size (in height or container size), assigned number and depiction of the mature tree canopy dripline as identified in the native tree list in the Urban Forestry Manual (delineated at the outer edge of the stand) for all trees to be planted and maintained as stand grown trees. The species of trees planted and maintained as stand grown trees shall be selected from the native tree list in the Urban Forestry Manual. The depiction of the mature tree canopy dripline shall be consistent with dimensions in the native tree list. The minimum size of stand grown trees shall be 2 feet in height (from the top of the root ball) or equivalent to a 1 gallon container size. The city manager or designee may consider trees less than 6 inch DBH as equivalent to newly planted trees if they meet all applicable species, size, condition and location requirements in this section. Overall, the selection of stand grown trees shall result in a reasonable amount of diversity for the site. Stand grown trees shall be located as follows: 1. No closer than an average of 10 feet on center from newly planted or existing trees; 2. No further than an average of 20 feet on center from newly planted or existing trees; 3. Trees categorized as small stature on the native tree list in the Urban Forestry Manual or by the city manager or designee shall be spaced no closer than 15 feet from the face of habitable buildings. The setback from the face of habitable buildings may be reduced if approved by the city manager or designee; 4. Trees categorized as medium stature on the native tree list in the Urban Forestry Manual or by the city manager or designee shall be spaced no closer than 20 feet from the face of habitable buildings. The setback from the face of habitable buildings may be reduced if approved by the city manager or designee; 5. Trees categorized as large stature on the native tree list in the Urban Forestry Manual or by the city manager or designee shall be spaced no closer than 30 feet from the face of habitable buildings. The setback from the face of habitable buildings may be reduced if approved by the city manager or designee; 6. Trees categorized as small stature on the native tree list in the Urban Forestry Manual or by the city manager or designee shall not be planted with the center of their trunks closer than 2 feet from any hard surface paving; 7. Trees categorized as medium stature on the native tree list in the Urban Forestry Manual or by the city manager or designee shall not be planted with the center of their trunks closer than 2 14 feet from any hard surface paving; 8. Trees categorized as large stature on the native tree list in the Urban Forestry Manual or by the city manager or designee shall not be planted with the center of their trunks closer than 3 feet from any hard surface paving; 9. Where there are overhead utility lines,the tree species selected shall be of a type which, at full maturity, will not interfere with the lines; and 10. Where there is existing mature tree canopy or other areas with significant shade, the species selected shall be an understory tree according to available scientific literature. However, understory trees shall only be planted when the planting of non-understory trees is precluded due to space constraints. N. Any supplemental specifications that the project arborist or landscape architect has determined are necessary for the viability of trees proposed for planting. O. A signature of approval and statement from the project arborist or landscape architect, attesting that the tree canopy site plan meets all of the requirements in Section 10, part 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual. S2LLON EIDNllEIdMOD N0I ,I,VDIrldcIV - �2Id CITY OF TIGARD • PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES TIGARD (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six (6) Months) PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: 2/28/13 STAFF AT PRE-APP.: C.Caines __ APPLICANT: Northwest Ventures Group, Inc. AGENT: Derrick Aragon Phone: 503-740-6917 Phone: PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: 12353 SW Grant Ave. TAX MAP(S)/LOT#(S): 2S102BA-02000 NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: Minor Land Partition (MLP) PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: 2-lot partition (second lot east of parking lot). The applicant has no plans to develop the new lot and will record access easements on both lots. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential ZONING MAP DESIGNATION:R-4.5 ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18. 510) MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 7.500 sq. ft. Average Min. lot width: 50 ft. Max.building height: 30 ft. Setbacks: Front 20 ft. Side 5 ft. Rear 15 ft. Corner 15 ft. from street. MAXIMUM SIFF, COVERAGE:_% Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area:_%. GARAGES: 20 ft. ® NARRATIVE (Refer to Code Chapter 18.390) The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. ® IMPACT STUDY (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050) As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE AN IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 9 Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. ® LANDSCAPING (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745, 18.765 and 18.705) STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. ® SENSITIVE LANDS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.775) The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS,WETLAND AREAS,ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT,OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. ® CLEANWATER SERVICES (CWS) BUFFER STANDARDS (Refer to CWS R&O 07-20/USA Regulations - Chapter 3) LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETA FED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION &ORDER 07 20 x ��' ��`. ...� '.e � ��,�- • Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25% I 10 to<50 acres 15 feet I >50 to <100 acres 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands<0.5 acre 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre <25% 50 feet • Rivers,streams,and springs with year-round flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining>100 acres • Natural lakes and ponds • Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25% I 10 to<50 acres 30 feet I >50 to <100 acres 50 feet • Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure in 25- • Rivers,streams,and springs with year-round flow foot increments from the starting point to • Streams with intermittent flow draining>100 acres the top of ravine(break in <25%slope), • Natural lakes and ponds add 35 feet past the top of ravines CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 9 1Starting point for measurement=edge of the defined channel(bankful flow) for streams/rivers,delineated wetland boundary,delineated spring boundary,and/or average high water for lakes or ponds,whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs,located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor,shall not serve as a starting point for measurement. 2Vegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. /The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet,if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor,except as provided for in the USA Design and Construction Standards. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREA IES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision,the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract,and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. CWS Service Provider Letter: PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the CWS R&O 07-20 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas,CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. /1 URBAN FORESTRY PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030) An Urban Forestry Plan is required with all Minor Land Partitions. Portions of the Urban Forestry code and Urban Forestry Manual have been provided since the language has not yet been codified. The entire code and manual can be found on the city website at http://www.tigard-or.gov/trees. ® ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.060) MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH,unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. CODE CNAPTERS 0 18.330(Conditional Use) 0 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) 0 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) II 18.340(Director's Interpretation) El 18.630(Washington Square Regional eg' Center) 0 18.765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) 0 18.350(Planned Development) El 18.640(Durham Quarry Design Standards) 1E1 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) II 18.360(Site Development Review) 0 18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation) 0 18.780(signs) II 18.370(Variances/Adjustments) 0 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) II 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) 0 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) 0 18.715(Density Computations) El 18.790(urban Forestry) El18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) 0 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) 0 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) lot 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) 0 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) 0 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) III 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) 0 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) lot 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) 1pt 18.420(Land Partitions) El 18.740(Historic Overlay) II 18.430(Subdivisions) 0 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) II 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) El 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) II 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) El 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) II 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) II 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 9 ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: Provide a narrative that states the proposal and facts to show how the criteria are met. Referring to the plan does not meet the criterion. Narratives that do not provide facts are considered incomplete and will prolong the review process. The existing facility was approved through a Conditional Use Permit (CUP2000-00003/SLR200-00011). In the narrative please address how the proposed partition does not impact the existing development or conditions of approval of the conditional use,including the pedestrian/bike pathway easement. Accessory structures are not permitted on separate lots,however if the second parcel were a tract then the structure would still be accessory and permitted. The urban forestry plan may be prepared by someone other than a certified arborist or landscape architect if the 40% canopy requirement can be satisfied through the street trees. Please provide three copies of all submittal items. PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. 0 Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. 0 Public hearing before the Planning Commission. II Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. The Planning counter cashier closes at 4:30 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 81/2" x 11". One, 81/2" x 11" map of a proposed project shall also be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Applications with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiting review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard Hearing's Officer . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RESERVATION (County Surveyor's Office: 503-648-8884) PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A SUBDIVISION LAND USE APPLICATION with the City of Tigard, applicants are required to complete and file a subdivision plat naming request with the Washington County Surveyor's Office in order to obtain approval/reservation for any subdivision name. Applications will not be accepted as complete until the City receives the faxed confirmation of approval from the County of the Subdivision Name Reservation. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 9 UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: Cheryl Caines PHONE: 503-718-2437 FAX: 503-684-7297 EMAIL: cherylc @tigard-or.gov TITLE 18 (CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE) IN IERNET ADDRESS: www.tigard-or.gov CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 9 RECEiVED FEB 2 12013 City of Tigard CITY OF TIGARD TIGARD Pre-Application Cort-- ! ` : - quest GENERAL INFORMATION /0� L ��S� (16-2‘4-44 —C /� res 7�� ` FOR STAFF USE ONLY Applicant: 7 (� L/ Case No.: 9gE2,0}3 -00O03 Address: Zyf9 7� 714/'L J 215./izt) Phone: ��3-746 _ /9- Receipt No.: 1 c1 035 S City: Pi)2K Zip: Application Accepted By: �/ /� Date: 21211 13 Contact Person: be cc ICI /1f7/Phone: SaJ776..9-- W DATE OF PRE.SPP.: 2-12Z/IS i � /� �a A---e C f LLL TIME OF PRE-APP.: O • DO rr Property Owner/Deed Holder(s): 7 vGtvt PRE-APP.HELD WITH: Rev.7/1/11 isAcurpin\masters\land use applications\Pre-App Request App.doc Address: Phone: City: Zip: 7 Property Address/Location(s): / Z J 5-3. W (7 roc vt..f Ave ' Sce Fd cl 7 z 2 REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS (Note: applications will not be accepted /without the required submittal elements) Tax Map&Tax Lot#(s): Pre-Application Conf.Request Form 6 COPIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: Zoning: Brief Description of the Proposal and any Site Size: 2 ° ? site-specific questions/issues that you would like to have staff research prior to the meeting. PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION Site Plan. The site plan must show the proposed lots and/or building layouts drawn All of the information identified on this form are required to be submitted by to scale. Also, show the location of the the applicant and received by the Planning Division a minimum of one(1)week subject property in relation to the nearest prior to officially scheduling a pre-application conference date/time to allow streets; and the locations of driveways on the staff ample time to prepare for the meeting. subject property and across the street. A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 weeks of the Vicinity Map. Planning Division's receipt of the request for either Tuesday or Thursday The Proposed Uses. mornings. Pre-application conferences are one (1) hour long and are typically held between the hours of 9:00-11:00 AM. Topographic Information. Include Contour Lines if Possible. PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDULED IN ❑ Filing Fee$627.00 PERSON AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER FROM 8:00-4:00/MONDAY-FRIDAY. IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND THE PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE GROUP. City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-718-2421 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 oft IIINCAi ITY OF TIGARD RECEIPT 114 - • 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard OR 97223 503.639.4171 TIGARD Receipt Number: 190358 - 02/21/2013 CASE NO. FEE DESCRIPTION REVENUE ACCOUNT NUMBER PAID PRE2013-00003 Pre-Application Conference-LRP 100-0000-43117 $81.00 PRE2013-00003 Pre-Application Conference 100-0000-43116 $546.00 Total: $627.00 PAYMENT METHOD CHECK# CC AUTH.CODE ACCT ID CASHIER ID RECEIPT DATE RECEIPT AMT Credit Card 09094C TLEHRBACH 02/21/2013 $627.00 Payor: Lydia Lundberg Total Payments: $627.00 Balance Due: $0.00 Page 1 of 1 R Er";""t 'ED FEB 2 1 2013 City of Tigard Permit Center CITY OF PGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., PLANNING=/='NG1 EERING Tigard, OR 97223 Planning Department Pre Application for Elite Care at Fanno Creek Lot Partition Elite Care at Fanno Creek at address 12353 SW Grant Ave, Tigard, OR 97223 is a 2.35 acre lot, Elite Care would like to partition into two lots. The new proposed lot will be split at the east part of the existing parking area. Elite Care has no plans to develop the new proposed lot or selling the new proposed lot. Elite Care will still remain the owner of both lots and during final plat will record access easements to both proposed lots. Thank you, • Derrick Aragon Northwest Ventures Group Inc. 503.740.6917 Frontl DSTS Subject: Elite Care at Fanno Creek Partition - Pre-Application Conference PRE2013-00003 Location: CR 1 Permit Center Start: Thu 2/28/2013 10:00 AM End: Thu 2/28/2013 11:00 AM Recurrence: Weekly Recurrence Pattern: every Tuesday and Thursday from 10:00 AM to 11:00 AM Meeting Status: Meeting organizer Organizer: -Pre-Apps_CD_Meetings Required Attendees: Cheryl Caines; Kenny Asher; Mike White; Steve Martin;Tom McGuire Resources: CR 1 Permit Center 1 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS I II III TIGARD City of Tigard MEMO TO FIT.F, To: MLP2013-00002 From: Agnes Lindor,Associate Planner Date: February 13, 2019 RE: Urban Forestry Modification- Satisfaction of Condition #1 The applicant submitted a letter from Andrew Craig of Springwater Arboriculture,LLC to replace Tree #5, originally proposed as Flowering Ash,with an Eastern Redbud. Both trees has a canopy cover of 491 square feet, therefore a type I modification is not required as the replacement in species does not result in a change in canopy coverage. I also performed a site visit today at 12:30pm and verified that Trees #5 through 8 have been planted and condition #1 of the approved partition (MLP2013-00002) has been signed off. 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov Springwater Arboriculture LLC CCB#158098 4547 5 E- Brae St Cvliltivaulu(--, OR 97222 (507) 671 4760 February 9,2019 This letter is to verify that 4 mitigation trees were planted at the Elite Care Facility,Fanno Creek, located at 12353 SW Grant St.,Tigard, OR 97223 on the morning of February 8, 2019. Trees Planted: 1 Bloodgood'Japanese Maple 1.5" 2 Katsura Tree 1.5" 1 Eastern Redbud 1.5" The Eastern Redbud was planted in place of the listed Flowering Ash. The Flowering Ash was not available so the Eastern Redbud was chosen instead. Easter Redbud has an identical Mature Canopy Area of 491 sq.ft. as the Flowering Ash. Submitted by, kJ\/CL! Andrew Craig ISA Certified Arborist PN5927 ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified andrew@springarborist.com TIGARD City of Tigard December 6, 2018 Elite Care Grant LLC PO Box 12564 Portland, OR 97212 Project: Grant Elite Care Partition Site: 12353 SW Grant Ave Land Use File: MLP2013-00002 Dear Property Owner: This letter is to inform you that the City cannot release the landscaping performance and establishment bond (Bond No. 105830256) in the amount of$11,588. The decision of the minor land partition required that either trees be planted per the approved urban forestry plan or a fee in lieu be paid for the required canopy.As of December 5, 2018,the trees have not been planted nor has the fee in lieu been paid. You may choose to plant the additional trees or pay the fee in lieu. If you choose to plant the additional trees, the bond will remain in place for one year from date of planting. If you choose to pay the fee in lieu, the bond can be released once the fee is paid. Please feel free to contact me at 503-718-2429 or via email at AgnesL@tigard-or.gov should you have any questions. Sincerely, 14111,6 Oetivw& Agnes Lindor Associate Planner Copy: Northwest Ventures;Derrick Aragon Travelers Insurance;Roselily Belo 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov TIGARD City of Tigard December 6,2018 Elite Care Grant LLC PO Box 12564 Portland, OR 97212 Project: Grant Elite Care Partition - City of Tigard L;,t: I.)S POSTAGE PITNE'"ROWES 11 • 111 I 13125 SW Hall Blvd. TIGARD Tigard, Oregon 97223Z IP 97223 $ 000Ar )000336894 DEC 06 2018 Northwest Ventures Group, Inc Derrick Aragon 2401 NE MLIK_Jr. Blvd • Portland, OR IXXE 7 1 De 2, DV:12/.14/1B ETR! T EElk - NOT DE LI VES,AB 1._E• AS AD-OR ES 2WMABLE FriFillikRD $3730 CrCf7 VIO B S722Z1,51,67 - 5 '133.25—3Z eCia—aire .;! ,§7?1; t14j. J.ALI. “.'0,WIM '1"'11"Pril'IMIT"1"14,T1".N'TI'',11"411'MVIT Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America Roselily D Belo TRAVELERS J 1501 Fourth Avenue, Suite 1000 SEATTLE,WA 98101 November 26,2018 Phone: (206)326-4267 Fax: (206)326-4292 Email: RBELO@travelers.com TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION TIGARD CITY HALL 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD, OR 97223 USA Attn: RE: Contract Status Inquiry Contract Bond 105830256 Principal/Contractor: ELITE CARE GRANT, LLC Orig.Contract Price: $11,588.00 Effective Date: August 22,2018 Travelers provided bonding on the below referenced project, and we are very interested in knowing how the contractor is performing. Project referencing is an important part of our underwriting process because it helps ensure the quality of our prequalification and allows us to respond to problems. Positive comments are as valuable as negative ones to help us be aware of a contractor's capabilities. According to our records the contractor indicated above has been engaged to perform the following contract(s): Project Name: GRANT ELITE CARE PARTITION Project ID: MLP 2013-00002 Project Description: Plant trees&vegetation in compliance with the City of Tigard Urban Foresty effective canopy&tree establishment requirements&Clean Water Services Begetated Corridor enhancement requirements. We would appreciate it if you would provide answers to the following questions pertaining to this contract. Has the contract been completed? ❑Yes_gNo If completed, please provide: Final Contract Price:$ Date of Acceptance: ; / If not complete, please provide: Probable date of completion: (A t/1'—+r6MlA Amount of payments to date: $ Please provide any additional comments(such as claims, liens, or unsatisfactory progress,etc.)you may have: 6ec, e,doe ok/(,/18 It is understood that the information contained herein is furnished for the confidential use of Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America and is merely an expression of opinion. Thank you for your cooperation. Completed by: e YreS (-1V� Title: PPSSUC.toJ-e P(-a.-%w2-),Date: (2-1(2 Please fax,email,or mail this form to the Travelers underwriter indicated above. S-7295(5/08) Cheryl Caines From: Cheryl Caines Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 12:00 PM To: 'Derrick Aragon' Cc: Mike White Subject: Grant Elite Care Plantings Hi Derrick, I'm going through my older files to see what I can close out. You said you would do the required plantings this fall. I wanted to check in to see if those had been done. Thanks Cheryl Caines Associate Planner City of Tigard (503)718-2437 cherylc(a�tigard-or.gov .. t • � r= TIGARD: City of Tigard October 3, 2013 MJP Holding,LLC Attn: Darrick Aragon 2401 NE Martin Luther I{.ing Jr Blvd Portland, OR 97212 Re: Permit No. MLP2013-00002 Dear Mr. Aragon: The City of Tigard has processed a refund for the deposit of fees on the above referenced permit for the following: Site Address: 12353 SW Grant Ave. Project Name: Elite Care at Fanno Creek Job No.: Refund: ® Check#211617 in the amount of$11,588.00. ❑ Credit card"return" receipt in the amount of ❑ Trust account"deposit" receipt in the amount of Notes: Applicant is replacing the customer deposit with a performance bond to secure that required landscaping and tree planting is complete. If you have any questions please contact me at 503.718.2430. Sincerely, Dianna Howse Building Division Services Supervisor Enc. 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov J City of Tigard TIGA Accela Refund Request This form is used for refund requests of land use, development engineering and building permit application fees. Receipts, documentation and the Request for Permit Action form (if applicable) must be attached to this request form. Refund requests are due to Accela System Administrator by each Wednesday at 5:00 PM. Please allow up to 3 weeks for processing of refunds. Accounts Payable will route refund checks to .Accela System Administrator for distribution to applicant. PAYABLE TO: MJP Holding,LLC DATE: 9/26/2013 Attn: Darrick Aragon 2401 NE Martin Luther hing Jr. REQUESTED BY: Dianna Howse Blvd Portland, OR 97212 Cheryl Caines TRANSACTION INFORMATION: Receipt : 192750 Case #: MLP2013-00002 Date: 8/20/2013 Address/Parcel: 12353 SW Grant Ave. Pay Method: Check Project Name: Elute Care at Fanno Creek Part. EXPLANATION: The applicant is replacing the customer deposit with a performance bond to secure required landscaping and tree plantings is completed. REFUND INFORivLATION: Fee Description From Receipt Revenue Account No. Refund Example: Building Permit Fee Example: 2300000-43104 $Amount Customer Deposit 100-0000-22000 511,388.00 TOTAL REFUND: $11,388.00 APPROVALS: SIGNATURES/DATE: If under S5,000 Professional Staff If under S12,500 Division Manager If under S25,500 Department Manager f(W If under 550,000 City Manager If over$50,000 Local Contract Review Board FOR TIDEMARK SYSTEM ADMINISTRATION USE ONS Case Refund Processed: Date: / 3/Z By: j I:ABuilding;ARefunds`,RefundRc.iuest.d,c x U9/OI/'-(ll r) 111 ■ Community Development TIGARDRequest for Permit Action TO: CITY OF TIGARD Building Division Services Coordinator 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 Phone: 503.718.2430 Fax: 503.598.1960 www.tigard-or.gov FROM: n Owner ® Applicant ❑ Contractor n City Staff (check one) REFUND OR Name: MJP Holding,LLC INVOICE TO: (Business or Individual) Mailing Address: 2401 NE Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. City/State/Zip: Portland, OR 97212 Phone No.: 503-740-6917 —Derrick Aragon PLEASE TAKE ACTION FOR THE ITEM(S) CHECKED (✓): ❑ CANCEL PERMIT APPLICATION. n REFUND PERMIT FEES (attach receipt,if available). ❑ INVOICE FOR FEES DUE (attach case fee schedule and explain below). n REMOVE CONTRACTOR FROM PERMIT (do not cancel permit). Permit#: MLP2013-00002 Site Address or Parcel#: 12353 SW Grant Ave. Project Name: Elite Care at Fanno Creek Partition Subdivision Name: Lot #: EXPLANATION: The applicant is replacing the customer deposit to secure for required landscaping and tree plantings with a Performance and Establishment bond (see attached). — ^ 11"4 b n rci GG-Ll Re co (L , Signature: 11..L D` ( c.Ci'�� Date: 8-27-13 Cheryl Caines Print Name: Refund Policy 1. The Director or Building Official may authorize the refund of: a) any fee which was erroneously paid or collected. b) not more than 80'm of the land use application fee when an application is withdrawn or canceled before any review effort has been expended. c) not more than 80'0 of the land use application fee for issued permits. d) not more than 80°o of the building plan review fee when an application is canceled before any plan review effort has been expended. e) not more than 80°�o of the building permit fee for issued permits prior to any inspection requests. 2. Refunds will be returned to the original Payer in the same method in which payment was received. Please allow 1-2 weeks for processing refunds. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Rte to Sys Admin: Date By Rte to dmin: Date /L1 3 43 By 11 Refund Processed: Date io/3z3 ByeM Invoice Processed: Date By Permit Canceled: Date /V r'9' By — Parcel Tag Added: Date By Receipt# Date Method Amount$ I:A Building\Forms\RegPermitAction.doc Rev 07/26/07 Bond No. 105830256 LANDSCAPING PERFORMANCE &ESTABLISHMENT BOND Grant Elite Care, LLC, as principal ("Principal") ,and Travelers Casualty&Surety Company of America ,a corporation authorized to conduct a general surety business in the State of Oregon, as surety("Surety"), are jointly and several bound to the City of Tigard, an Oregon municipal corporation as obligee ("City"),in the sum of $11,588.00 to assure compliance with the City of Tigard Urban Forestry effective canopy and tree establishment requirements and Clean Water Services Vegetated Corridor enhancement requirements. Principal is obligated to provide landscaping(minimum effective tree canopy and vegetated corridor plantings) and meet establishment periods as set out in the approved plans and conditions of approval of City of Tigard Casefile: Grant Elite Care Partition (MLP2013-00002). In the event Principal fails to complete required plantings or meet establishment requirements, Surety shall pay the fee-in-lieu on written demand by the City,up to the full amount of this bond. Surety's total obligation shall not exceed$11,588.00. On full and satisfactory completion of Principal's obligations under the partition approval, City shall release this bond. The City shall have 90 days from notice from Principal that the obligation has been completed to verify compliance with the partition approval and release the bond. The City shall have no obligation to release the bond if Principal has not fully complied with the partition approval. In the event of suit or action be filed by the Obligee hereunder to enforce said contract or to recover under the terms of this bond,in addition to all other rights and remedies, the City,in the event it shall prevail, shall be entitled to recover such sums as the Court may adjudge reasonable as and for attorney's fees. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have caused this bond to be executed this 22nd day of August ,2013 WiditteAd 144144, Principal By: AltiNee, Ce (Title) (A true copy of the Power of Attorney must be attached to the original of this bond). Travelers Ca,'c lty&Surety Company of America Surety Attorney in Fact Gary Morrison P.O.Box 128 Forest Grove, OR 97116 Address WARNING:THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY IS INVALID WITHOUT THE RED BORDER POWER OF ATTORNEY TRAVELERS' Farmington Casualty Company St.Paul Mercury Insurance Company Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company Travelers Casualty and Surety Company Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters,Inc. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America St.Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company St.Paul Guardian Insurance Company Attorney-In Fact No. 224075 Certificate No. 0 0 4 569 925 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:That St.Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company,St.Paul Guardian Insurance Company and St.Paul Mercury Insurance Company are corporations duly organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota,that Farmington Casualty Company,Travelers Casualty and Surety Company,and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America are corporations duly organized under the laws of the State of Connecticut,that United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Maryland,that Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Iowa,and that Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters,Inc.,is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Wisconsin (herein collectively called the"Companies"),and that the Companies do hereby make,constitute and appoint Amy Waltz,Douglas A.Nordholm,Thomas Christopher BeLusko,Judy Charles,Gary Morrison,Crystal Woods,David Harrison,and Molly Dober of the City of Forest Grove ,State of Oregon ,their true and lawful Attomey(s)-in-Fact, each in their separate capacity if more than one is named above,to sign,execute,seal and acknowledge any and all bonds,recognizances,conditional undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof on behalf of the Companies in their business of guaranteeing the fidelity of persons,guaranteeing the performance of contracts and executing or guaranteeing bonds and undertakings required or permitted in any actions or proceedings allowed by law. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Companies have caused this instrument to be signed and their corporate seals to be hereto affixed,this 4th day of October 2011 Farmington Casualty Company St.Paul Mercury Insurance Company Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company Travelers Casualty and Surety Company Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters,Inc. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America St.Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company St.Paul Guardian Insurance Company r,As•u,,z� ��111:1. J E\0.E 6� ��W_-INSO P SA` Jp�tY ANo _11 Y �ayoPP 4 ?**'"4.1.1\ .� Q: .•q �+'J ....4q.': 9 6G 4 py, '(� t x �s n - Z 116"vRA>F�A IW4'60RP°4: 9a fj Y 1982 • 4 v �; :ml .._ < - lie < ^" ° ®r 1851 `� ,z W w c°Nk .74 c r � �:, i,: oI 4. a �1 / ' SEAL,o1 �:, .+ CONN. n "- /8= a Li/ k A°. .� 1v_ �"� SVIfANGE` d1....la•(•J V.-'.... D >yb +Df 1 S.as Ats State of Connecticut By: _ City of Hartford ss. Georg Thompson,'enior ice President On this the 4th day of October 2011 before me personally appeared George W.Thompson, who acknowledged himself to be the Senior Vice President of Farmington Casualty Company, Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company,Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc., St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company, St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company,Travelers Casualty and Surety Company,Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company,and that he,as such,being authorized so to do, executed the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein contained by signing on behalf of the corporations by himself as a duly authorized officer. to./Er44_ In Witness Whereof,I hereunto set my hand and official seal. ' \MO). C2 ' My Commission expires the 30th day of June,2016. * °ORO * Marie C.Tetreault,Notary Public O 58440-6-11 Printed in U.S.A. WARNING:THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY IS INVALID WITHOUT THE RED BORDER WARNING:THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY IS INVALID WITHOUT THE RED BORDER This Power of Attorney is granted under and by t' •hority of the following resolutions adopted by the Boarc iirectors of Farmington Casualty Company,Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company, Fidelity and`,ranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc., St. Paul Fire and Is/Sprit Insurance Company, St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company, St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company,Travelers Casualty and Surety Company,Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company,which resolutions are now in full force and effect,reading as follows: a RESOLVED,that the Chairman,the President,any Vice Chairman,any Executive Vice President, any Senior Vice President, any Vice President, any Second Vice President,the Treasurer,any Assistant Treasurer,the Corporate Secretary or any Assistant Secretary may appoint Attorneys-in-Fact and Agents to act for and on behalf of the Company and may give such appointee such authority as his or her certificate of authority may prescribe to sign with the Company's name and seal with the Company's seal bonds,recognizances,contracts of indemnity,and other writings obligatory in the nature of a bond,recognizance,or conditional undertaking,and any of said officers or the Board of Directors at any time may remove any such appointee and revoke the power given him or her;and it is FURTHER RESOLVED,that the Chairman,the President,any Vice Chairman,any Executive Vice President,any Senior Vice President or any Vice President may delegate all or any part of the foregoing authority to one or more officers or employees of this Company,provided that each such delegation is in writing and a copy thereof is filed in the office of the Secretary;and it is FURTHER RESOLVED,that any bond,recognizance,contract of indemnity,or writing obligatory in the nature of a bond,recognizance,or conditional undertaking shall be valid and binding upon the Company when(a)signed by the President,any Vice Chairman,any Executive Vice President,any Senior Vice President or any Vice President,any Second Vice President,the Treasurer,any Assistant Treasurer,the Corporate Secretary or any Assistant Secretary and duly attested and sealed with the Company's seal by a Secretary or Assistant Secretary;or(b)duly executed(under seal,if required)by one or more Attorneys-in-Fact and Agents pursuant to the power prescribed in his or her certificate or their certificates of authority or by one or more Company officers pursuant to a written delegation of authority; and it is FURTHER RESOLVED,that the signature of each of the following officers:President,any Executive Vice President,any Senior Vice President,any Vice President, any Assistant Vice President,any Secretary, any Assistant Secretary,and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile to any Power of Attorney or to any certificate relating thereto appointing Resident Vice Presidents,Resident Assistant Secretaries or Attorneys-in-Fact for purposes only of executing and attesting bonds and undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof,and any such Power of Attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signature or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company and any such power so executed and certified by such facsimile signature and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding on the Company in the future with respect to any bond or understanding to which it is attached. I,Kevin E.Hughes,the undersigned,Assistant Secretary,of Farmington Casualty Company,Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company,Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters,Inc.,St.Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company,St.Paul Guardian Insurance Company,St.Paul Mercury Insurance Company,Travelers Casualty and Surety Company,Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America,and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the Power of Attorney executed by said Companies,which is in full force and effect and has not been revoked. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seals of said Companies this Ad day of 4c5 c5 3 ,20/3. Kevin E.Hughes,Assistant Sec tary py A54q!• aJ YORE +..,.1.NSUA'9 yWUPq00 Y ANO ,t0"44446. N� i W 18 Y 2t" b rowan lnts ft.;�; eitaPORA A 68S iaco < '98 0 1977b 1951 7g•`SEAL,n zi;S_RLja ! gZsy" tcFa •1 +N� .;;Ob 7 747 To verify the authenticity of this Power of Attorney,call 1-800-421-3880 or contact us at www.travelersbond.com.Please refer to the Attorney-In-Fact number,the above-named individuals and the details of the bond to which the power is attached. 1 WARNING:THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY IS INVALID WITHOUT THE RED BORDER CITY OF TIGARD RECEIPT 11111 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard OR 97223 503.639.4171 TIGARD Receipt Number: 192750 - 08/20/2013 CASE NO. FEE DESCRIPTION REVENUE ACCOUNT NUMBER PAID MLP2013-00002 Customer Deposit 100-0000-22000 $11,588.00 Total: $11,588.00 PAYMENT METHOD CHECK# CC AUTH.CODE ACCT ID CASHIER ID RECEIPT DATE RECEIPT AMT Check 1044 TLEHRBACH 08/20/2013 $11,588.00 Payor: MJP Holding LLC Total Payments: $11,588.00 Balance Due: $0.00 Page 1 of 1 CITY OF TIGARi. RECEIPT 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard OR 97223 503.639.4171 TIGARD Receipt Number: 193359 - 10/03/2013 1 CASE NO. FEE DESCRIPTION REVENUE ACCOUNT NUMBER PAID MLP2013-00002 Inventory Fee-Open Grown Tree-each 100-0000-43116 $112.00 add'I MLP2013-00002 Inventory Fee-Stand of Trees-1st 100-0000-43116 $181.00 MLP2013-00002 Inventory Fee-Open Grown Tree-1st 100-0000-43116 $137.00 Total: $430.00 PAYMENT METHOD CHECK# CC AUTH.CODE ACCT ID CASHIER ID RECEIPT DATE RECEIPT AMT Check 1121 TLEHRBACH 10/03/2013 $430.00 Payor: Northwest Ventures Group Inc. Total Payments: $430.00 Balance Due: $0.00 • Community Devel tent WILL CALL/PICK UP TIGARD Fill out this form completely and attach it securely to the document(s). Bring it to the WILL CALL /PICK UP area at the Permit Center Counter and file alphabetically by last name of individual or company name.e. TO: DeDe,,-;d Pc. COMPANY NAME: DOCUMENT NAME: FROM: C .. I C • DEPARTMENT: C D DATE TO WILL CALL: `O - g -13 FEES DUE: 3O.D� 1r �n�ePl}o✓h ATTACH FEE INFORMATION(ACCOUNTS,PERMITS,COPIES,ETC.) Document will be returned to the originator if not picked up within 5 business days of the"DATE TO WIL CALL". RECEIVED BY: MUST BE SIGNED BY THE PE' ON ISTED ABOVE RECEIVED DATE: 6 2 /_ - DATE RETURNED TO ORIGINATOR: - I:\Building\Forms\RteSlip-Ni11Ca11.doc MLPG?Ol,3" OOOOa.. Page 1 of 1 ..� i-► q • TIGARD City of Tigard May 30,2013 Derrick Aragon Northwest Ventures Group, Inc. 2401 NE MLK Jr. Blvd. Portland, OR 97212 RE: Completeness Grant Elite Care Partition, Case File No. MLP2013-00002 Dear Mr. Aragon: The City of Tigard received your original application submittal for a Minor Land Partition on May 6, 2013. The development site is located at 12353 SW Grant Street. Staff has completed a preliminary review of the submittal materials and has determined that your application was complete as of May 29, 2013 for the purpose of beginning the 120-day review period for a final decision. The formal comment and review process will take approximately three weeks. It should be noted that staff has not reviewed the application submittal for compliance with the relevant code criteria, and that additional items may arise during the application review which may require further clarification. Should you have any questions with regard to these items, please contact me at 503-718- 2437. Sincerely, CJA4-44' Cheryl Caines Associate Planner c: MLP2013-00002 Land Use File Elite Care Grant,LLC,property owner 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov LAND USE APPLIC.TION Proteect:_ a 13I ooa COMPLETENESS REVIEW CEI COMPLETE INCOMPLETE ST' ► 1 •RD INFORMATION: o Deed/Title/Proof of Ownership C •- . is ... • .. • .. is, ,i-8 . . . . - .--s g. ] a.ct Stud (18.390 `i SA Service Provider Letter C _:- •-'. -. • - 0. Enveloses with Postage(Verify Count) ❑ #Sets Of Application Materials/Plans-"Paper Copies" C Pre-Application Con erence to es ❑ #Sets Of Application Materials/Plans-"CD's" PROJECT STATISTICS: M -Btk+dniy Footprint ►,r %of Landscaping On Site B----- XI Lot Square Footage �frtdrng, - - PLANS DIMENSIONED: ® Building Footprint ❑---&ftdhng•Heig 1 ADDITIONAL PLANS: ®" Vicinity Map Q---- s44eetara ®' Existing Conditions Plan 2_ I [ Tree Inventory El.-Site-Phu [ .__--L-/ttmg-ptan TREE PLAN I MITIGATION PLAN: l.e.ba., 1=n•-eS•6 re-i-tnkior, ro. .c a-ti R. Cwt►,o P�/ n w•S e' "1 2 O'' C°`►^ePy '��.ni . me,t' d ska-e c f -4-�►--c t r . ADDITIONAL REPORTS: (list any special reports) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ RESPONSE TO APPLICABLE CODE SECTIONS: a 18.330(Conditional Use) ❑ 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) 11 18.340(Director's Interpretation) CI 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) ❑ 18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation) ❑ 18.780(Signs) ❑ 18.350(Planned Development) ❑ 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) ❑ 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) ❑ 18.360(Site Development Review) ❑ 18.715(Density Computations) Et 18.790(468-Removal) (,t,a Via;,.,► :f,f,r f-rt. ❑ 18.370(Variances/Adjustments) ❑ 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) -❑ 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) ❑ 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) ❑ 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) ❑ 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) Pre 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) ❑ 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) ❑ 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) ❑ 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) ❑ 18.740(Historic Overlay) ja 18.420(Land Partitions) ❑ 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) ❑ 18.430(Subdivisions) ❑ 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) ii 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) ❑ 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) ❑ 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) • ❑ 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) ❑ 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) ❑ 18.765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) ADDITIONAL ITEMS: • I:\curpin\masters\forms-revised\land use application completeness review.dot REVISED: 6-Jun-07 .......„ „...„ Cheryl Caines From: Mike McCarthy Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 8:58 AM To: Cheryl Caines Subject: Elite Care - Grant Ave MLP 2013-02 Attachments: Mike McCarthy P E .vcf I've taken a look at this and don't see any information I would need that is not already provided,so I would have no objection to considering this complete. Mike IvIcCarthy P.E. Oh City of Tigard Senior Project Engineer Streets and Transportation 13125 SW Hall Blvd TIGARD Tigard,OR 97223 (503)718-2462Direct (503)624-0752 Fax mikem gtigard-or.gov DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules -City General Records Retention Schedule " 1 INn TIGARD City of Tigard May 16, 2013 Derrick Aragon Northwest Ventures Group, Inc. 2401 NE MLK Jr. Blvd. Portland, OR 97212 RE: Completeness Grant Elite Care Partition, Case File No. MLP2013-00002 Dear Mr. Aragon: The City has received your application for a minor land partition (MLP2013-00002) to divide a 2.62 acre site into two parcels. The development site is located at 12353 SW Grant Avenue. Staff has completed a preliminary review of the submittal materials and has determined that the following additional information is necessary before the application can be deemed complete: 1. Clean Water Services Service Provider Letter. The letter provided is not complete. Please provide three copies of the approved plan (Page 4) that is attached to the letter. 2. Urban Forestry Plan. Requirements of section 18.790 (Urban Forestry Plan) of the Tigard Development Code apply to minor land partitions. The Urban Forestry Plan must: • Be coordinated and approved by a landscape architect (the project landscape architect) or a person that is both a certified arborist and tree risk assessor(the project arborist), except for minor land partitions that can demonstrate compliance with effective tree canopy cover and soil volume requirements by planting street trees in open soil volumes only; The street trees canopies do not satisfy the canopy requirements;therefore the Urban Forestry Plan must be coordinated and approved by a landscape architect or certified arborist/risk assessor. The plan provided is not approved by either. Please provide aplan that is approved by either a landscape architect or certified arborist/risk assessor. • Meet the tree preservation and removal site plan standards in the Urban Forestry Manual; The plan does not meet the preservation/removal standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. I have highlighted the sections of the Urban Forestry Manual that seem to apply to your partition. Please have the arborist or landscape architect provide that information and approve the plan as required. Some of the highlighted provisions relate to trees to be planted. If no new trees are to be planted, those related to planted trees do not appy. 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov • Meet the tree canopy site plan standards in the Urban Forestry Manual;and The plan does not meet the canopy plan standards in the Urban.Forestry Manual. • Meet the supplemental report standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. A supplemental report was not submitted. Please submit a report meeting the standards found in the Urban Forestry Manual. • Tree canopy fee. The applicant has proposed paying the tree canopy fee to satisfy the 15%effective tree canopy cover requirements for Parcel 1. Please provide calculations of the correct fee based on canopy information documented in the supplemental report. Should you have any questions with regard to these items, please contact me at 503-718- 2437. Sincerely, Cheryl Caines Associate Planner c: MLP2013-00002 Land Use File