Report (51) I
\---:a fv) c, 1,.. 4
TIGARD DEVELOPMENT 1. .0E SECTIONS APPLICABLE TO :.,dDIVSIONS l r
Residential Zoning Districts '�� L_L1 �l L' yi
Table 18.510.1 indicates that attached single family dwelling units, as proposed for this
development, are permittedin R-4.5 zoning districts as part of an approved planned
development. The applicant is seeking detailed planned development of this project in addition
to subdivision approval.
The R-4.5 zoning district has the following dimensional requirements:
Minimum Lot Size 7,500 square feet T 4,/
Average lot width 50 feet M,,,
front yard setback 20 feet `u<q,
side facing street on corner or through lot 15 feet
rear yard setback 15 feet , L
Side Yard setback(all lots) 5 feet _l
Distance between property line and garage 20 feet
Maximum height 30 feet
Maximum Lot coverage none
Minimum Landscaping none
The preliminary plat received on February 20, 2001 does not show that all lots will be above the
minimum lot size; however, planned development standards (18.350.070) allow for flexibility in
the minimum lot size, lot depth, building height, and lot width standards of the base zoning
district. Planned development standards regulate required setbacks in the following manner.
Structure setback provisions:
A. Front yard and rear yard setbacks for structures on the perimeter of the project
shall be the same as that required by the base zone unless otherwise provided by
Chapter 18.360;
B. The side yard setback provisions shall not apply except that all detached
structures shall meet the Uniform Building Code requirements for fire walls and
C. Front yard and rear yard setback requirements in the base zone setback shall not
apply to structures on the interior of the project except that:
(1) A minimum front yard setback of 20 feet is required for any garage structure
which opens facing a street.
(2) A minimum front yard setback of eight feet is required for any garage
opening for an attached single-family dwelling facing a private street as long
as the required off-street parking spaces are provided.
Proposed dwellings on Lots 39-49 appear to be located within the 15-foot required rear yard
setback on the perimeter of the project. The proposed dwelling on Lot 16 also appears to
encroach on the required rear-yard setback. In many cases the intrusion into the setback areas
is the proposed rear-yard porch. As described in Section 18.730.040(D), porches may be
allowed in setback areas if they meet certain requirements. The proposed porches on these
units appear to exceed these requirements. To address this issue, the following condition shall
apply:
CONDITION: The applicant shall provide revised plans for building locations on Lots 39-49 and
for Lot 16 which comply with setback requirements, as well as with other
applicable dimensional requirements, including garage setbacks. If the applicant
desires to locate porches within the required setback areas, the applicant shall
demonstrate that all proposed porches will comply with standards in Section
18.730.040(D).
The applicant's proposal complies with all other setback standards.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above and satisfaction of the above condition, the
residential zoning district dimensional standards are satisfied or can be met and
will be required to be met as part of the building permit review on individual lots.
OUAIL HOLLOW SOUTH SUBDIVISION PAGE 13 OF 29
SUB2000-00004/PDR2000 tTRE2000-00001