The URL can be used to link to this page

10145 SW WASHINGTON SQUARE 1014a SW Washington Squ. Rd. 1S1 358 100 Restaurant #4396h pt w ' S ,!' i . ie. i.,,,, ' * i ^v ;m s A • WHI I I Inf/.•IIUI COP /•I J r) G J YELLOW Pormlttee PINK Temporary Fila r' " NO APPLICATION FOR BUILDiIJG PERMIT GOLDENROOP blic'Work• UUILDING / j c. � CYC/ �.,(/��/. ✓i, /, / 2 WASHINGTON COUNTY ADDRESS Q ✓-. sr DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING LOCALITY BUILDING DIVISION r1EAREST ROSS ST Z.Z. giammommimmla �'� , U; )v� I TYPE I PROC S FOR APPLICANT TO FILL IN s ONSTY4/ B.1 N�11 HUI'_DIN(., y ,,WELLINtr UNIT`./A : ZONE Ar1I)q(5SWashington SquarC.Pzuiiress_. Di,-' .ONTNG APPROVEUBY /�� DATL�/3/'�b _�DEL�C TION on of NW '4,Secticl,, LSA ��rrr ) IC, I - I YPE OF SANITATION e'1,1 z4 /7 `>-�,f •wns:Tir 1 outh, nge I West, IILOc.SE TBACK FROM ss'' . Will ar)ette Mer]dian, Washington Cty 1 RO'T PROP LINE OF� �"� No Of Si_DGS 'Yr"of E IIIThnp Setback fllghw•v n Yar,I ' 7 ,n, AREA OF LOT 22,066 NOW ON I OT Q 'Irghw•v Wrdrh I F rom CL USE Of Yn, ./ E%ISTING BLDG N/A -_-- N IDG.SE TBACt: F ROIEI OWNER TGI Friday's TOEl 1214 -233'- `IDE PROP LINE OF '•' MO I VP,of I E■I•tins Setback I Hlghw•v • Yarn I t•, 4 ADDRESS 14665 Mjc "ay Road (IIQItWY1 Width F,o,' CI CII' Dallas, Tex4S 4/4 ARCHITECT Bloodworth TEL CORNER CUTOFI YES 1A or ENGINEERf!Laj'149p,)r ill$ NO 639-9430 E' }'� /000 S..W.kkVarna St.. Pcarlan.. /2:i V."14!,_ - `\ ADDRESS L 1 dQ0443'.//00411 1 CONTRACTOR Out to Biri TEL N/A /44497-JS-L-- [ 477 -72:. �O^ �� 1 P ADORESS NiA "Ley./S _sea Se-41 �ll `CITY NSA 23oaTrp 10,1cL-uvd 5116A15. / i A V DESCRIPTION OF WORK k ire �: 1 s�r ��+ NEW ADD Al 11 9 REPAIR DEMOLI' I �� ` -p-p- _. Iv \lk soS ZEFT 8002 STORIES 1 FAMIILIES 1 FI FOR AMOUN RECEIPT NO. DATE NO BEDROOMS 0 NC) OF BATHROOMS 4 ZONING COMPLIANCE -I' r, 3/ USF OF DESIGN RE VIEW • 1TRUCT09E Restaurant _ r---- .0 'SIGN DESIGN REVIEW `^ VALUATION S J21 O/ O�ft _ ~---_-- I� PMT. o �y ST TAx QQ FIRE MARSHAL f - ' FEE S�'WI: EE Sid d�L CQ FEf S L)S _. + ""�� I HE REF9Y ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS y` {1� .j 1 14) APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE ABOVE IS CON _ r RE CT AND AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL COUNTY OR i G�.�� 1:c/.7�//7� UDINANCES AND STATE .LAWS REGULATING BUILDING _0 Y(,),L GQNSTAV4 }� Y SIGNATURE OF k`� 4ti..i1 ` e^'x•`- . ____..r._i ___._.__ _, PERMrtTEE 1^ �� t ._-+-- --- ♦ 1 ' r, f NAI INS'I cc ION DATE 12 'I PLAN CHECK VALIDATION ®� O. `CASH PERMIT VALIDATION K MO CASH RECEIPT NO. .,.) 3 / DATE l/4 r RECEIPT NO 9 -3/ DATE i/ t<71,' G .i4) /1 \ ,INSPECT1ON CARD Washington County Dept.of Planning BUILDING DIVISION 648-8761 Address Permit No. Called By _ Owner ElFtg F--] Fdn Fdn Wall Fireplace [l Cover Nailing pi Final Other Inspector' s Remarks: ___''*'‘I--"'--st.-e-w0-L.''' --:':'ic." - Ad -.....4 _ ;,-: ,--,A0/'""..... . .1..e-tr...- ';:./ /Lei __L.__ , Date Building Inspector Washington County Dept. ,t Planning WILDING DIVISION INS Pt;C'110� LARDWashington Permit Nu. Address Owner Called By �� [ Cover iliNailing I-_-_1 Firal �Ftf""-1 Fdn Wall �_I Fireplac. g � J Other if _ _-- Inspector' s Remarks: — Building Inspector 7^? - Pate w...- BUILDING DIVISION INSPLL1 Itl` CARD Washington County Dept .of Planning 648-8761 Permit No. Address Owner Called By _ � (Final nFtp �, Fdn Wall Fireplace Cover Nailing LJ Otht"r Inspector ' s Remarks: v -------__--. Building Inspector __________ _—L.------------ -..-------------- : Date 1 F____ INSPECTION CARP. Washington County Dept.of Planning BUILDING DIVISION 648-b16i Permit No Address —r---- Owner Cal1od By ❑ Nailing n Final ❑ Fireplace Cover El Ftg n Fdn Wal . Other -------_--- Inspector's Remarks: -- Building Inspector — Date ..+,....._ w INSPECTION CARD Washington County Dept.of Planning BUILDING DIVISION -` 648-8761 Address Permit No. Called By ' Owner rJ Ftg Fdn Wall F-1 Fireplace n Cover Nailing [I]Final Other --- Inspector' s Inspector' s Remarks: Date Building Inspector INSPECTION CARD Washington County Dept.ot Planning AUILUING DIVISION 648-8761 Address Permit No. Called By Owner Ftg Li Fdn Wall ri Fireplace 0 Cover n Nailing [ ]Final Other — — Inspector's Remarks: I . • Date _ Building Inspector IN';PLl:1'1GA CARD Washington Count De t .o! Planning BUILDING DIVISION ng } P 648-8761 Permit No. . , , / address Called By (net _ Ftg [-1_ Fdn Wal pi Fireplace n Cover n Nailing [i Final Other • Inspector' s Remarks: Date _ Building Inspector INS.PLC1'ION CARD Washington County Dept.of Planning BUILDING DIVISION 648-8761 i Permit No. Address _ Called By Owner — ptg n Fdn Wall LI Fireplace ❑ Cover F-1 Nailing u Final Other Inspector's F:emarks: Date Building Inspector _--.-..ee....---- __.---.. - SPL41iON CARD Washington County Dept.of Planning BUILDING DIVISION 648-&761 Aldress Permit No. Called By Owner +.--"] ptg Fdn Wall Ii Fireplace in Cover ( 1 Nailing r1 Final • Other Inspector' s Remarks: ___ __ Date _- __ Building Inspector 11 11 INSPL:Ci ION CARD Washington County Dept .of Planning BUILDING DIVISION 648-8761 Address Permit No. Ca1l2d By Owner n Ftg Fdn Wall Fireplace F-1 Cover n Nailing ( ! Final Ocht Inspector'c Remarks: Date Building Inspector _ o INSPi;CliON CARD Washington County Dept.ot Planning BUILDINC DIVISION_ 648-8761 Address Permit No. Called By (Owner Ftg L J Fdn Wall [1 Fireplace r--] Cover 0 Nailing f]Finai Other Inspector' s Remarks: Date Building Inspector INSPECTION CARD Washington County Dept.of Planning BUILDING DIVISION 648-8761 Address Permit No. Called by _ Owner _ Ftg L J Fdr Wall U Fireplace n Cover [I] Nailing Final Inspector's Remarks: �'' Date Building Inspector ' .:,lf.p..r • INSPECTION CARD Washington County Dept.of Planning BUILDING DIVISION 648-8761 Address Pe -mit No. Called By Owner _ Ftg 1 J Fdn Wall fl Fireplace r I Cover 1. 1 Nailing [ ,1Final Other Inspector' s Remarks: Date _ Building Inepectoi • _INSPECTION CARD Washington County Dept.of Planning BUILDING DIVISION 648 8761 Address Pe mit No. _ Called By _ 'a.'ner - Ftg Fdn Wali I� Fira_pl.+ce n rover I Nailing n Final i)t h In c or ke• rks• C � r ' J 14,- ,��. - / .,�.� ,411-14",- Hite -14" -H.ite 1 i I p or INS PCC'1'ION CARD Washington County Dep' .of Planning BUILDING DIVISION 648 87(,I Address _ Pe mit No. Cal led By _ �1wne r Ftg Li Fdn Wail FirLplace 0 Cover E.1 Nailing [J Final Ot h. ► . _ .+'„ , , . ... s -"+ \ 411 Air_ In c or ke• rks• Irate - - -- 1 i p r or r1$PECT1Ui. CARD Washington County Dept.of Planning BUILDINC DIVISION 648-8761 Permit Ni. Address Owner ('.celled By Ftg , Fdn Wail F-1 Fireplace Ci Cover [] Nailing El Final Other Tnp'.ctot' .; };,,darks: Date __- Building Inspector • INSPECI'UJN CARD Washington County Dept.of Planning BUILDING DIVISION 648-8761 Permit No. Address .._ Owner Called By Ftg Fdn Wall � � -- --� Fireplace F-1 Cover Nailing n Final � Other Inspector' s Remarks: Date Building Inspector '4 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OFF-ICE OF FIRE MARSHAL INSPECTION NOTICE OWNER DATE / ' //` / b OCCUPANT -- . ;r./ I/l Rr-jf.• OCCUPANCY/'i .•• 'PAW r-Jv•� LOCATION _ . /add ' /az/if YOUR ATTENTION IS CALLED T• TN FOLLOMING ripe$AFETV OEFICIFNCIESI / CAI•_URE TO CORRECT THE ABOVL CONDITIONS NITNIN—��_OATS WILL MAKF YOU LISA/LE fo TpOE%[uTICN. {NOL ,r' FIMt RESULT FROM SUCH CONDITIONS YOU MAY Bt. LIABLE FOP DAMAGES TO 'ERS0 9 SI( P .)F[NF� Ely G1�A9FT11E4 Or ORS 470 ISO / /a y- M Pr" MAR�HAL .. / WASHINGTON COUNTY FIRE DISTF 41CT t 17100 S. W. BLI,ATON STREET /� s. .b ALOHA, OREGON 97005 644-8577 FORM ROO 40 - ___ Jr_ 11111111.11111,4111.104 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 1 C� OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL 1`,92 • INSPECTION NOTICE OWNER *- __DATE OCCUPANT OCCUPANCY,` 11;-..1241/ `a LOCATION ____ ---► - , YOUR ATTENTION IS CALLED +n 'HE FOLLOWING*IP •-RI r V pEFI_CU$MCIE1I 'T I lar • 7— r AiLuWE ro CORIaECT THE ABOVE IONDI TIONS WITHIN DAv7 WILL MVO LLIcAJ5) ROSECUTI,N .{HOU..:, I"NE RESULT FROM SU:H COMMT IONS YOU " • NE :IABLE POW DA5SS If Tp•l'ER�_ '^W7 EiMDJRI �U AROVIt♦IGN$ OF • ORS•+f .90 Film MARSHAL WASHINGTON COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT #1 17100 S W. CLAP•TON STREIET ALOHA, OREGON 97005 694.177 PRESENTED TO.- BOO 40 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU } 40 2 OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL 1 INSPECTION NOTICE `� ,-- DATE OWNER '1 1` _ _-- / ,' , 1 i' f /"k"1 LS _ r OCCUPANCY__ OCCUPANT —'~ Ada E-1 Y115L( -� . ' 1 . • .NCIFII' • TOY/4 VOL-LOWING f: FIH6 11 / J _ rOUP A.MENTION I• "fr 'i T i / DAYS W. L MAMA A'AF)t 4 IF. � NOl�CIJ�ON 5..�'.'i I N _- P OI4S J!. ►Nr,F !-P T YJ Uy0E*' ISIONS 0I. BY FAILUR[ TO F;fiRR'_CT TNf ♦•OVE CONCI TIONS W17NIN ISE/ULT FROM SUCH CONDITIONS YOU MAY OE L+A•l.0 FOR DAMAGES T �- - -�— r„- 7 ORI 470 +/O .-.�--+—..__.T� FIRE MARSHAL WASHINGTON COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT M1 17880 S. W. BLANTON STREET 649 8577 PRESENTED TO — ALOHA, OREGON 97005 FORM •00 A0 • FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU Oc'FICE OF FIRE MARSHAL INSPECTION NOTICE OWNER - • DATE ' . ..........----_—_-— �......__ OCCUPANT _ OCCUPANCY i' :2, `''- L Ar' c, LOCATION _ ------_—.� ._ , ----- I TOUR AT 11.60 MON tI CALLCD re.'.orrOL-DMING !`jit: s.ct Tv nc..it+ew6lE • I"lib"/ I IV _____ y____ ____ l _-- - ,,eofie*/: _ i `- • . _ -- - r Iµ,t ,,,p)- t /' :� I -- r f: ft L _ - FAILURE TO CORRECT THE ASOVE CONDITIONS PI THIN nA i S WI L MAME VOL) LIAHI 1 ' F HOSECUT'ON OUI 0,FIRE^ RESULT FROM IUCH CONDITIONS YOU MAY Et LIASILE EON OAMAOEI TO PERSONS OR ,N ,OF.R I r UNDtR` 'itl�is O� Y . 71 WASHINGTON COUNTY FIRE LISTRICT M1 FIRE MARSHAL A 17880 S. W. BLANTON STREET ALOHA, OREGON 97005 649.1577 PRE SENTEfl To_ r_1. a'_... FORM 900 41) FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU • OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL INSPECTION NOTICE OWNER -- DATE _ - OCCUPANT „ _-_ OCCUPANCY ., LOCATION YOUR ATTENTION IS CALLED 10 THE FOLLOWING FIRE SAFETY DEFICIENCIES: • FA:LURE TO CORRECT THE ABOVE COND'•T'OHS WITHIN DAY, WILL MAKE /OU LiAOL.0 "ROSECl/T!ON SHOULD FIRE RESULT FROM SACH CONDITIONS YOU MAY WE LIAWLE FOR DAMAGE! TO PERSONS OW ROW-illTY URO'VR RROYISIONI OF ORI 471 140 WASHINGTON COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT N1 FIRE MARSHAL 17960 S. W. BLANTON STREET • ALOHA, OREGON 9700S 649-9577 PRESENTED TO - FORM 900 41` nermd�atr�es Since 1926 1350 Northwest Raieigh Street • Portland, Oregon 97209 • Telephone 15031226-7611 April 18, 1979 Wier Casad^ Company 17636 Emerald Drive Milwaukie, Oregon 97222 Attention: P1r. Gene Allen Subject: T G I Friday's Restaurant Dear Gene: This letter is to advise you that all laminar.ed glass we have furnished and installed for the subject project is in accordance with State of Oregon Uniform Building ^ode. Should you require any additional intormation, please do not hesitate to contact me. . Yours very truly, —11k BEN INDULT ES Jour C. doss Cgntracr Sales JCR:db u APR 1 ; 1919 • WIER CASADY CO. GENE ALLEN 5• 1 'y;.r! •t .ii 1 t,ti,110 11•ei4iI.il_141161;;Y!''"iiP.:4.4.1Ai t��l,il1. 1 h(i.66.44;et'i01i1l1.liL4t ;4;41;10t1.latiZ(1.1b4;4liai6hi.� A r�i:1s. ,. - ' r r ; � l'.r%1i.l� l :(7,::bior` t� ,�iI1 I tt .1Ia .. P .H1 .tr3liirt _Lw ' I r Issutu nY i REGISTiI�f 1) Dote tree lett or7 '� . PI(CATIO�� JOHN IOYLC & COMPANY, INC. m�r,ufocturrd 1.11 : '< •�-I COtdClf,l! f.0. 112 114 DUANE STR(tT, 3/25/76 ) v —� NEW YORK, N.Y. 10007 . f A•211 t. •:I , r, 1 . t 212-96/.4770 • This is to certify that the materials described on the reverse side hereof have been llome- relcrdont treated (or erre inherently nonflammable). 1r,5 \VasllinPton Street FC)R_ __John Boyle & Co. Inc. ADDRESS- --7 — c. 1'ittsburgn SlATE __-}'cnnsylvania Cerlificalian is hot eiv made that: (Check "a" or "b") (a) the articles (lesll:r•cl en 011' rt-ierso •.itis of ihic Lei tif tali•time ben trcuted with ti flame-rclordanl �...�� uthe•mient approred rid tcrrittered by the Stow Fir N,urhal and thrlt 111.! apphcut. 1 r,f saitd themical was cicmt• ut rer,lornlonce with the lows of the Siai,: of Colifoinia and the .:u!es and Rcyulutions cf the Str•ta fire Marshal. Name of chrrrnicnl wed ,_._. ._ ____ ----------- __Chem. Reg. No.__ ____ ___— .11 Method of upphcr,tr,-.11 .. .... .... • (b) 1h•• c nccl^s rl,',eri!cd en Ow rcvrr•e sid'r hereof ore made from a flame resistant fob is or ma!eriol .• E rernterrd and approved by the Stoic Fire Marshal for such ..� Bimini Fianictest F-121-3 Trudtr name of flom,:•resistant fabric or mnterinl u'.rc; . Rei. No. The Flame Ret t caant Process Used WILL NOT Be Removed By V/fashinq '=IJnNNJI'lE E,/C0A1PA11y, INC. ;' JOHN BOY LE tr Co. INC. }' 4% Le C l.�i�" eti .I , •. /pp/v..A S,,na.r.. • • •4 ti /!'r4' ,419 c;,at r.t yc,rl,.:.rlct'c; U' ' ' ' • ' • ;r rtlrrlt ll.? i; ii'v tf.cr.tritr..cr.cr... r.:,c!'.(r.St!..tr.tr...tf.'.(j.r.1.-.r...r. ';• �w11► . ,. • !^ - ,►.� ., i:- err .iS. . .w�.. _ +. ", ....ir. `-,.'..' . 1` . r • 1,..r'`:'M .. .~« 'Arty.," • " ..t •�N',�I'I.'� u' e'.'.4. ;q,.L..,„ I , •;'f ��'•: M. ;� '`n`4f 0.1% rni.•,vu9,yat...'1„ I t • .tr i\1 ,I�:Q,I+,f(µ�Lyt1^."..., ,' ��+ `r r411k.t.1.4 1%444 r� i A � _4s I1( � '� 1f`.��'*1i1I h: :'�li' cifc,e.,1, 'I, ., . , ri IIP".-' Mfrr .i• '1•Jo ' >~ .t. lt~v r i-e.. - w •+ T�, , r I r yra `^ •N^ e,•''ry/ VAIR_(�..""-r. L:*.r;rorri rree V1f4"e ,...0%r'.., f•s+•-..erev,t;. ••'1: r�► r.�i1W. -~F*rrd�~.-'04 }PI+��/1...•".LSI....:SC.:.4✓NOSAddt",21". .1°."i.'v:/^':+.►NI"4'1+:1P' .1% it-y.,/fw�llv., - •::. • rGLASBORD. hi, 11.1, ,I,,nl!l,tlg 1 t • 1 i ^"'.w 1. . Gaston(' flat paneling is manufactured by a Contin t , t „tit ':`,� uous laminating process and is offered in standard t • t , buildinq'panel and special Cut sites Its length availahll Ply is limited only by handling and shipping cape- I �� bll'ties A recent manufacturing innovation pelmets the 1 paneling to be produced in extra-wide widths and is referred to as K mg Site Glasboul flat paneling's inanely ua' is for lining R walls and ceiling... Its ease of cleaning and U.S.CI A i -- igo C T�i. ► Jcceptance maker it highly suitable for use wherever 1^t�tr t sanitation is important Glasbord flat paneling is tough � s{N �r �� d a and resistant to impact It is ideal for installation (L �Y O--,L`�Xi where a hied durable cleanable. finish Is .felted I F{$ \g 9°4 The surface of the paneling Is specially embossed Gia a unique feature of Glasbord which provl!ies extra abra J,c""ate i,r;, sion resistance This embossing is a pebble like finish �' r"'� ,e with shallow depressions which hold the glass fibers e , 1 S. N un,form distance below the surface so there is no tall / M(��Ow�(lU .ler of their breaking out and causing contamination 1 w •"l' Go ,• ", Glasbord frp paneling is highly suitable as an inter, la I 1''r t.. or finish material for insulated building panel systems 'C t. s The panels can he full height in one piece without i �a� seams,whatever the.height from curb to ceiling Thee ° f• _ are no bol itontal seams`o fail and become unsanitary ` Because Glash(nd frp paneling Is highly resistant • I to nnnl5tule as well as to impact and ablavorl, It Is ideal • I lo, an•as that air constantly wet such as hh.kr./ end a — l_ _ ! 4`* A . bowel rolxns ! + 1 i ` • A TiJan'tawny Nifldnwd ,Glasbflat panel is also • 1 1 L. . available in beep The colo' will not Chip, flake, or lwear away. More than a surface coating, the pigment I Q'l impregnates the enter panel depth Custom colors lb are available in mill ,quantity 41 t i nu , -J, The panel is available fire retardant tot use where r `.a - II required by burbling codes Called F Ire X Glasbord, it / •9 ik •I --f s•,, _ has ph, characteristics simmer to the regular panel, •"! r, _ {dl .l „s Adis,: Hama spie.xl retro{of 15 11 L labeling �` . Al- ,� is available 0r• - - — 'i , i .l••• I ,.1 atl,or,1 hat ndnt.I w theldntl,Blift I „p reit low Ilp ee el, ' ® 1 np.renur,on r•foliar an11,n i.t,Or of a n ptS''.,Men Meir al • Ni. e V . 'reeler 2 Sara* .01,etant CC lalhord,(inns(avatar,n a bow/'inlay,lye f l •`.�Rysmipipiip Ierb eros oyeih•tan M,.eel Ann rapealwo removal.,thou' ,lama*. 3 f air loon k hen,1011114 u,+'initis anti easy with r,laeno,tl �� wells . 4 In plan)offl a IIal t,hoM a^Vrblehrn NMI'sot'(,IaN,prn IIA,panel on nnrh 1,5101 tf I aiiii1itinnal Wall.of nl.nnn rel 8.••••• 1\lay nota look m!i • Innen, 'i ^ (, I a,tory Inn,it fn//„I walls anti I elan*I,,r,l w,th(,I.11,Or,t • its'trona are flan,e/,Mani 'easy to It weft Glean / prof Nino seen maroon r ening n.nalt ere luWlemiefl Ir om RIllrfr hat'OW constr.'Ito,,*Oh Itowh,nh01 ,iai.il*Mel 111 � ' I•I B P'slat. elan IM tory rannatal wall',anal,*ha up lien to a,nnq(22'mall.wolf”no horn/oiler seats J Wee:herp,O01(ii*,ora i,"naiine Il,.wn el a•ter.O'1011,1 „ for•to iron*ranter .1 '.1 ' If 10 (i,aNiOrn (1a, panel hal this Ile.'fluty to IMO.. el frailly I ) ,�) v4110 10'16. odd shows 1I No won Waits oh I1, q ,/e(il.ihnrn nal panalm*',t',torah'tnym i p a lir holier bait no well,nrle,e 'er.. I fr Iiiri I i I 111114t•rhe nmetl,."1 hone M"eMl"Ann*Il rill,nlanfled to tulle.I 1 / hal monk oratinfml IIy thN to any onion Inalert,Al.tulle. .e ,rel lila taviator's November 21 . 1978 'moi ' part Mr. Ray Wold Washington County Bldg. Dept . :11:11 150 North First Ave. Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 RE : Gradebeam/Slab Keyways Dear Mr. Wold: We have been requested to notify you that under the field conditions and circumstances of the construction of our restaurant within your jurisdiction that we and our struct1ral engineers have no objections to the use of a keyway between the gradebeam and slab areas providing the keyway is penetrated by the dowel rods . If we can be of any further assistance, please feel n �\\��/' V�v, free to call upon us . / V C) J Respect ul1y"\ J fYlo. M loin R. Fain ViLe President/Architecture MF/ae CC : J .C. Schrage Gene Allen Bill Dixon Ill'1:1 TGI Friday's Inc. 14665 M..iway Roaj. P.O.Bor.400320 Da11;s.Texas 75240 (210233-230C • irliiiil WASHINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMFwr OF PLANNING h ly/8 RECEI' ItD vemher 17 , 1978 Washington Co. Administration Bldg. r Building Department TIM .•-: ' nir0 150 North First Ave. Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 r Dear Mr. Wold: I have been requested by Gene Allen, our general con- tractor' s superiatendent of construction, to inform , you that we have no aversion to the substitution of Iiii ' 1" exterior gypsum �..►11b'iard for the 5/8" as noted in our construction docume�its providing Washington County has no objections . The reason given us by our general contractor was the unavailability of the specified material within the general market area. If we can be of any further assistance, please feel r free to contact us. Respectf Mel✓i . .a n M(DNIA/j Vice President/Architecture 1110 > :0,., MRF/sk ' Wier Casady/.1 .c' . Schrage , Gene Allen IC...) p ' .,y Ili , , . 6 MI Friday's Inc. 14663 Itizway Road. P 0.Boz 400320 Da11az.Tezas 75240 (21.1)233-2900 1 A. FROM (� c- Let '�:cn LAAIL s k, .in 14 o n G'o. i,� l[.,<.nt lac>�.+. TO WIER CASADY COMPANY R t4. �q.y La. .tol GENERAL CONTRACTORS • LIC #180840 5410 Venice Blvd..Los Angeles,Calif 90019 • 7131933.7311 SUBJECT /CTiehy '4 (-via- `i �' fob, .5'Ada 6-c_ DATE //- / 7$ �C�rwrLL ` "}? ce46? i- v your �, lc s , GL L o ✓e Ti b. ('/ / /--C O 7 o 4" R".„4/ ?rc�ca 4.0a �•e q G 7 So ge. w •d, red.', I — C Or y /�, ' 6c4,. ..,> ,.,r 67 c7c. /.rt P r-o< <fs co % �aran pos 71s Y 6eti4.ws 9 410.1 10 VG; r / s® �t! /c//w� 1 r7u fCc>a✓ /6r•- /Q.s e•r Q iw /O - 7d PLEASE REP Y TO +10P SIGNED .421,4„.„4„ ATE SIGNED N0 WHITE ANL PINK .)P;ES INTACT. PINK C0Pr TO BE RETURNED WITH REPLY. F ores,Products Dwislon Lamm or1.icts Dept ..44 Koppers Company. Inc.P.O. 64 • Magnolia. Ark. 71153 T,;: 501-4, 2r nr,n, J " - PPERS WIER CASADY CO. Architectural and GENE ALLEN Construction Materials DATE At11 1 1918 i; Act Kt��l C.V RECEIVED 1r)-1R j1�N � ._ AUG 1 t 1,378 7 MIRcAA0v00. • 0-117=11111 5-2 s SHANNON i WILSON, INC. Geotechnical Consultants 2255 S W Canyon Road•Portland, Oregon 97201•Telephone (503)223-6147 October 18, 1978 TGI Fridays, Inc. 14665 Midway Road Dallas, Texas 95240 Attn: Mr. Scott Martin FILL CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS, OREGON Gentlemen: The fill construction at your restaurant site near the Washington Square Shopping Center (I-205 and Greenburg Road) was completed at the end of last month. We visited the site on a periodic basis to observe the progress of the work (both excavation and backfill) , take photographs, and measure in-place densities of the fill. Work was slowed by wet weather and site visits were made on the following dates: Cornforth: Excavation phase - August 24, 25, 26, 28 Fill construction - Avg. 31, Sept. 5, 18, Oct. 2 Technicians: Fill construction phase - Aug. 30, 31, Sept. 1, 2, 7, 15, 20, 26 Field notes on site visits by D.H. Cornforth through August 28, have been previously sent to you in our letter dated September 6. Field notes covering the period August 30 to October 2, 1978, are enclosed with this letter. One set of photographs of the fill are also included with dates on the back side of the photographs. Field Density Results The results of field density tests are given on the attached Table I. The table shows the approximate location and eleva- tion of each test. The in-place dry density values are the actual densities measured by the sand cone procedure (ASTM William L Shannon.P E $l&ntat 0 Wilson.1•E DMI A.SSue .►.D.•Walter L Wrlphl.P E •Raymond P Millar P E •SIMIRUItr D.Schwan,C .•M MIM•Altradeh.P L•DewM N.DMRMN,P.E. David E Hilt•.P E •Rohn 0 Abbott.P E •Robert J Densest,CIA •Ps ,E,Nam,.►.E.•Opals YM11Mp PA. Baena••Spokane•Portland•Ow PlM eler••Palatines•DE leer 0-1175-2 TGI Fridays, • October 18, 1978 Page 2 D 15s.:,) and include rocks of up to 1 ).5 inch or 2-inch size . The atar.dard laborator" compaction test (ASTM D 698) , witt, on which the field density results are compared, is performed soil finer than 3/4 inch. The oversize rocks kof veare scereensdis out prior to the tests, and the percent tabulated on Table I. The reason for excluding the coa':ser rock fragments is that large rocks create large void spaces with the edge of the compaction mold which are unrepresentative of the compacted soil. Inclusion of the large rocks could thus give a ' false' comparison with in-place tests. To estimate the maximum dry density of each sample taken in the field, a 'one-point' compaction test was performed in the laboratory at the natural moisture content using :ne standard compaction procedure. The natural moisture content is sufficiently close to or$ imam that the apprmatetmaximum dry density can be estimated from the 'one point' sketching ir the probable compaction curve. On the above basis, the results (Table I) shows that some very high field densities were achieved by the vibratory roller. This is also borne out by the very firmsurrfacest uoftothe6fill ll observed during our site visits. Only 1 below the specified 97%oollecompad.ction waand re we net unpderstand when that (i) is the area was subsequently old well was excavated and backfilled and (ii) cement rejects were used to reduce the surface moisture content. Obviously we would have preferred if the contractor had informed us of these developments prior to proceeding with his construction. However, it is our general opinion that the siteigradig orkd k has been performed within the intent of the sp_ we recommend acceptance of the work. Very truly yours, SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Derek H. Corn rth, P.E. Vice President DHC/k1r encl. Table I, Field notes I C Clo1) Or > •a L (I) u ..1 O rn .--1 Ul ON co r-♦ CIN O a) .-1 N CO q0 rn .1 N U 11 Cr) rn rn N N r-1 .-1 .-1 .-1 .-1 (n rn Cr [i' In rn 1 In a) In 1.4 LP 4. N G., 11 = .-1 ro d' a 1 rn 0 D C a) ° + + + + + + + + + •- + F + u m 0 o C O o 0 0 o C cl C " :O (N 0 0 0 .-1 Ip • 0 O O O O O O O i.) Q O CP T O O O ▪ p, --, .-1 .-1 r1 ri r-1 .•1 .- r•d .-1 .-1 � .-1 I-1 O1 O WU O O O 0 O vl O O O O O Ir' U1 Li-) 11.1 LI) la O, u -1 .11 .-1 r-1 N N N rt1 q C • .-1 O O r-1 .•1 •1 .-1 .-1 _-4 .--1 r-1 0 0 0 Cl) 1. a) .--1 .-1 .-1 r-1 .-i .-1 .-•1 r•1 .•1 r-1 r1 r1 .-1 r-1 .-1 . Q 0 u >,. 0 Ca a) a) r•1 N N Cr CO UD -4 N Ul rn N r r1 .}' O O u u * in 0 Li.) in d aD In ID .O N CO rn 4D m N (.0 N N. ..1 r•1 .-1 r-1 .-1 r-1 .-1 :--4 .-4 .-4 .-1 r-1 .•1 .-1 r--1 '-1 0 (.1') z W a) Q .-(C) u-1 .y' (a 0 CO CO m rn .1 0 d' '- NCP d' 1-4 a) 9C4 to U O rn %1) .-4 Cn 'Cl ID N O t0 N Cf. N cr. •--1 N W I Q C • N .-1 N N r-4 r 4 N N N .4 .-1 0 0 0 .-1 .-1 H C a) ri .-1 - .-1 -1 .1 r.1 .1 .-1 .-4 .-1 .1 r 4 r- .-1 .--1 CLI 1-1 0 H • W X 1-7 ON CD a) rn rn CP co a) a) on CT CP CP CN OT O O O as .•1 .-•1 .-1 r1 H a W W N $.4u 1-1 F1 11 N U gr, >4 N (3) a) (.1) a) a) a) (1) CD IG.1 1.4H 1.4 u 4.1 IC/ N C) a) Ll [ O U G 0 0 0 0 0 G 0 a) 0 G) U U U U U U U U • Z O C W 0OU 0 'D Z U ) Z U) U) U) Z Z O Z M 4-1 0 0, •.1 144 V-1 11.1 111 144 W W W •-4 O O U 0 1311 w n O O O O O O O O u w •r+ •.+ 40 o A v 3 W X W W 3 3 W U C � 1. O 'D W 'D 4.1 C - - - - 0 3 '" *k1 CO 1.4 • .•1 .. 0 ).1 1) O in ul O O O O a - rn 21 0 •r1 rn C: N rn N N N rn (l N rn A .-1 A u u • A • • U) '1 • U) u • U) Z U) Z Z Z U) U) - • N, .0 X GO• ,n C) • in In In O O O O O rn Z rn (I) U) N U U) N ,n rn N In M rn l0 CI) .•-1 r-1 r.1 Ul In 0 0 VD IO IO u rn rn rn .-1 .•1 N N N N r♦ •4 N N N N N A CO CO CO rn rn m CP m o rn rn rn' rn c\n m rn n kD 1"-- aD a) O .-1 N rn e}' In q0 0 0 .1 N on d' I .-1 .-1 .1 .-4 .-1 .-1 -1 a' H z r 66 0. ;k. 1v 0-1175-2 FIELD NOTES Wednesday, August 30, 1978 Fie]d technician visited site to check foundation of excavation prior to backfilling. Contractor was excavating loose materials along west side to achieve a minimum of 7 feet clearance between footing line and bottom edge of excavation slope. The Contractor attempted to proof-roil the north wall with a loaded 10 cubic yard truck. Due to the wet conditions, the truck became stuck and proof-rolling was discontinued until the following day. The Contractor is to place a very thin gravel layer over the surface prior to the next proof- rolling. This will provide satisfactory wheel traction for the truck. Thursday, August 31, 1978 Field technician visited the site, and observed the excavation of soft materials from the north and northeast areas of the • site down to elevation 87 feet approximate. The dark layer indicating top of original ground is at approximately elevation 90 feet. The major portion of the building area has been excavated about 2 feet below the topsoil line. Over-excavati•.:r has been necess•lry in many places to remove drain tile and to insure that inorganic soil has been reached. The Contractor proof-rolled the entire building area except in the south portion the building. Elsewhere, contractor is placing a thin layer of granular fill and compacting it with a Bomarq BW 21OD self propelled vibratory compactor. -1- 0-1.175-2 D.H. Cornforth also visited the site. The fielu technician has redorted that the 7 feet offset from the centerline along the west side has been achieved. The south 20-foot wide strip of the building area still has loose foundation soils which have to be removed and cleaned out. It is our understanding that this will be accomplished soon. The quality of the fill material appears to be very satisfactory thus far. The technician believes that the northeast corner foundation area is somewhat softer than the rest of the building area. The base of the excavation is higher in the r.,rtheast corner and the te,.,nician will ask the contractor to dig a shallow pit to insure that we have reached natural ground. The field technician revisited the site in the afternoon. The Contractor had already removed the remaining materials from the south portion of the building area. The first field density tests on the lower fill layers were taken today. Friday, September 1, 1978 Field technician visited the site and observed the placiny of granular fill in shallow lifts, each lift being compacted by the Bomarq BW 210D compactor. Field density tests were performed, one in thc southwest corner and one in the scut.heast corner. The technician was told that the Contras h ,u er.,ountered an old well on the east side of the building area in the late afternoon of the previous day. Apparently the Contractor was cimpacting the lower fill layers when a wet condition was .noticed. The Contractor then excavated the area with a backhoe and discovered that an old brick-lined well, approximately 15 feet deep was at this part of the site. The well was excavated by the backhoe and contained brick, numerous tin -2- 0-1175-2 cans, bottles, and a roll of wire fence. It is our understanding that the well was backfilled with granular fill and compacted in thin lifts using the back of the backhoe bucket. Note: Shannon f, Wilson, Inc. representatives did not observe the well and were not present during its excavation and backfill. It is our understanding that Mr. Allen has identified the location of the well and has submitted this information to you. Saturday, September 2, 1978 Field technician visited the site to observe placement of granular fill. Two field density tests were performed. TuesdaY, September 5, 1978 D.H. Cornforth visited the site. Heavy rain over the weekend has stopped fill placement. The fill already in place appears to be compact but relat'Lvely impervious, with water ponding locally. The fill is approximately 8 feet below ground level on the west side and approximately 4 feet thick. No work in progress today. Thursday, September 7, 1978 Field technician visited the site in the afternoon. It is our understanding that the Contractor placed 6 to 8 inches of clean rock 1:: 1 ] over the site at the beginning of the day to improve the working surface after the heavy rainfall of the previous days. This layer of cleaner rock fill was placed at approximate elevations 91 to 92 feet. The Contractor ' s operation was again shut down in the afternoon due to heavy r, -i showers. Two field density tests were performed. -3- 0-1175-2 A four-inch layer of softer material was noted in the north- east corner of the building area. The Contractor wag informed of this and stated that the materials would be removed when the work was resumed. Friday, c, ntember 15, 1978 Field techni_:.Ldn visited site to observe backfilling operations. Two field density tests were performed. Monday, September 18, 1978 D.H. Cornforth visited site and took photographs. No work is taking place due to wet weather. The till is within about 1 foot of final grade at the northwest corner and slopes down to about 3 feet below final grade at the southeast corner. Gene Allen said that they had imported some cement rejects from Oregon Portland Cement to dry out the fill surface. lie told me that the amount of rejects placed in the fill was approximately 5 to 6 tons and that it was toothed in the fill, windrowed, and then bladed down and rolled in. The layer containing the cement rf'jects was approximately 6 inches thick. lie also indicated there were approximately 3 lifts of very cle rockfill plae' at various heights within the backfill. In appearance the fill looks to be very firm with a few local spots where the rolled surface has a clayey surface appearance. There was also very small quantities of weak lava present in the fill. Mr. Allen said that it had only been brought in with the final loads and the quantity appeared to be insufficient to have any significant effect on the performance of the fill. -4- 0-1175-2 Wednesday, September 20, 1978 Field technician visited the site and took two field density measurements. The percentage of coarser rock in the fill was higher than previously. Tuesday, September 26, 1978 Field techniciln visited the site and took three field density measurements. :'he percentage of rock larger than 3/4 inch was again higher than in the earlier tests. Monday, October 21 1978 D.H. Cornforth visited the site and took photographs. The fill is now up to grade and wor:cmen are setting out the footing locations. Discussed the well discovered at the southwest corner of the site with Gene Allen. He estimates the top of the well to be elevation 83, approximately 12 feet below the base of the nearest footing. He also estimates that the well was at least one foot outside the .A-16 (?) footing and this information has been transmitted to the Owner. The well was approximately 3 feet in diameter and he estimates that approxi- mately 35 cubic yards of rock fill was placed within the wall. He also commented that a considerable amount of farm manure was excavated from the southwest corner of the site. The thickness of the manure tappered off towards the east and north. Despite the weight of the overlying fill, the manure was still very soft and compressible. This manure was first discovered during the test pit excavations earlier in the year. -5- f `d .y� INS P. F.H. CONTR. ARCHIT. Whalll!•1CTOf. COU ITS tUILuiNo JtPAr�T�AE11T AC.FIIZ NO0 STRUCTURAL PLAIN CHECK T.1 . 1 FRIDAYS RESTAURANT i.11'1H ,\,ldresc Progress - Washington Square _.__ . rcnitectMr.lvin R ran AdUres', 14665 Midway Road, Dallas Tex. 75240 NHrIA i t In. Plan Chock No. 6007 occupancy B3 .:onst. VNSorinrtvr Yes 'ro,erty Line Set i s: Front •tear Side Sloe Washington Eoun y istrict x 1 .1istriCt 'ons irnW 1 Arod Uv Code: t�dslc 1 iro Zone 5 4,500 x 1/3 6,000 sq. ft. Increase for :;nrinkiars 6,000 ' 3x = 18,-MT Sq. ft. increase for Side Yards TOTALS F;ul ►dirn� ;Ise B 3 Assembly Restaurant !iui IJinN •area: Wiseman? 1st Floor9,1202nd Floor Sru Floor Area Separations Hit itatirr.y •'peninr,, Nom. Rdtinys_ .icc.uoancy Separations RR •tjtir : ,.%prinirn,, RR Rdtinl;sl� Attic :)raft Stops 1 vertical :matt; range vent ;orriior .;oust. L K, `s qu 1 red: !SasemtentI t loor 2n0 Floor- ;rJ F1for Total ifrl 3-3'0"x6'8' Ln.•loses: air Fuel gas c.ix�llny .ystun '1eatln; S; sill F ire rlesistive -1ss* i l les '';Jink.ier system plans to to submitted to the Building Divi icr before ensu=n. Bryce GOraOn 1iJtr+ 2/ 14/78 -. a;r ,. ,7.. V+-iab��ingtoru County Fire Ditstriet No. 1 it�_` � 17880 S.W. Blanton Stree: W �f: rf 4 Aloha, Oregon 97005 ' ' Bu•ea.i of Fire Prevention 6.ty-85.'7 Pans Examination Report No._ 9$9 =ire Stet on Progress County Plan No. LG, -- Run Distance Building T.G.L_Friday's Restaurant __ __ Occuoancy B-3, Assembly Fire zone 3 _ Aadress Washington Square Ccnstruction Type_ V-N _ "Arcf,itectr Des {'ner_ i l I—Fain Address 14665 Midway Rd. . Dallas. Tex_ 75240 Owrtnr Winmar Co. , In;:. Address 900 Fourth Ave. #'40, Seattle Wa. 98164 :+ones-._I— Main Area_2.114 SQ.f 'Basement Area none Attic Height_.i.f.b:/Stops none Fre Wal ls-SQl2L—.Fire E•capes none Exits 4 Nota w.dth 15 fly_. Stairs._1_./Enclosed.. Q___f)tter Vertical Shafts_/Enclosed yes Sprinklers yes* Area Covered entire bilis. Alarm. no S.F. _11SL_Ext.E.L.5..,/Class_ - /No. - - Com:us' on Dotect or._n./Type _ —_ /Area Covered_- Finor wood*lqudrry tile Ce•trng ttn/wood/gyy.bd/act. _Roof como.shiagle/ruilt-up Str. Mombers_ d . __Wall Cover (Ext.)_ wood/brick /(Int_)uvD,bd/i d/ceC.tile Heating System_.__fS2rS�. _. Fuul_, electriLlitY Cooing Sy:,tem__ integrgl._ — Th; pans for thr above described project were referred to tnis offic^ 1/24/7b and reviewed,__ 1/20/.7t_ for conformity with State and District fire safety laws and regulations. Li3tud as follows -.re ap!),Icable requirements for which we have found no prov!sione in our examination of the drawings, q"neral no;e. an+: or r.pecifications 1 . Exit doors numbered 2, 3 and 13 must be fitted with panic hardware. Door no. 1 leading from the dining area to the vestibule rrust be fitted with panic hardware if fitted with a lock or latch. All other doors shown on the drawings must be upenable from the 'Inside " for immediate exit without the use of a key, special knowledge or effort. (ref: Sec. 3303 and 3316 :..L.t.. ) -. According to our calculations the sidewalk dining area #1O1A will accommodate a maximum occupant load of 26 rather than the 32 as shown on the seating plan. The i upper din��in area, #105, ding to our calculations, will accommodate a nlaxi- =uwm-oe �l""` load of 46 athe than the 66 as shown on the seating plan. The / Ounalo E. M voy � CONTINUED IFire Marsh // r -<•" i , I 4 By.—_ __.�._—.:* _ •e* r _4- Plans Examiner/Cons ucti n Inspe•cto CC: Winmar Co. Wasl . Co. Bldg. Dept. (2) Iliv"sc�o00iv„ Inrpector Butts FIRE PREVENTION DOES NOT CO. ` -- r , PAY! F.--- Plans Examination Report No. 989 T.G.I .Frida_v's Restaurant Page 2 lower di'..ng area, 0102, will ac :ommodate a maximum occupant load of 26. Accordingly, the seatin5 arrangement must be adjusted to reflect this capacity in each instance The total permissible occupant load for the building (including the bar area which we have rated at 33 occupants) is 221 occupants. The building must be pcsted at that capacity with the placard, which will be furnished by this office, located adjacent to door- way 01 , i.e. the doorway leeding from the dining area to the vestibule. (ref: Sec. 3301 S.B.C. ) 3. All curtains, drapes and similar decorative accouterments ( if provided) must be composed of noncombustible materials or must be rendered "flame- proof" with certification of such flameproofing submitted to this office. (ref: Sec. 26.102 U.F.C. ) 4. In all walls and partitions, fire stopping consisting of 2" (nominal ) lumber is required at all floor and ceiling lines and otherwise at maximum vertical and horizontal intervals of 10 feet. Penetrations made in this prescribed fire stopping to accommodate wiring, plumbing, duct work and similar utility runs must be packed, following the installation of said utility runs, in a manner which will maintain the integrity of the fire stopping and effectively cut off all concealed draft openings in the building's combustible void spaces which can act as chimneys and flues. (ref: Sec. 2517 S.B.C. ) 5. Tne V'tchen hood exhaust ducts must be constructed of no. 16 gauge galvanized steel rather than black iron as indicated. (ref: Sec. 1107 S.M.C. ) 6. The kitchen hood must be constructed of not less than 22 gauge galvanized sheet steel , stainless steel of not less than 030 inches in thickness n- of copper weighing rot less than 24 ounces pei foot. The inside edge of the hood must overhang or extend a horizontal dis..ance of not less than 1 foot all sides beyond the edge of the cookin; irface, and the vertical distance between the lip of the hood and the cooking surface must he not more than 4 feet. (ref: Sec. 1109 S.M.C. ) 7. The kitchen hood, crooking surfaces and exhaust duct must be provided with an approved automatic fire extinguishing system which is effectively intertied with the fuel supply system to the cooking equipment. That is, operation of the kitchen fire extinguishing system must automatically shut off all fuel to the cooking equipment. (ref: Sec. 1 .216 U.F.C. ) 8. Complete plans for the installation of the automatic sprinkler system proposed fur the building must be submitted to and approved by this office prior to its installation. (ref: Sec. 302 S.M.C. ) CONTINUEC Plans Lxaminatior No. 989 T.G. I.Friday's Res'.aurant Page 3 9. Regarding Section 15500 of the specifications, the fire department connection for the automatic sprinkler system must be fitted with National Standard Threads. (ref: Sec. 13.308 D.F.L.) 10. The location of the fire department connection for the automatic sprinkler system as shown on the drawings is riot readily accessible to mobile fire apparatus. It is recommended that the fire department connection be located in the planting area si,;acent: to the column on the southwest exposure of the building. (re: Sec. 13.209 D.F.C. ) 11 . A fir fighting water supply consisting of standard fire hydrants having a mini- n.i aggregate flow of 1 ,000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 p.s.i . and located within 500 feet of all portions of the building is required. (ref: Sec. 13.208 D.F.C. ) 12. Inspection and approval of constr:*ction by this office is required: a) Prior to cover of interior framing following the installation of the utility runs and fire stopping prescribed in requirement #4 above. b) Prior to occupancy of the building; prior to opening the restaurant for occupancy by the general public. (ref: Sec. 304 S.B.C. ) 13. One set of approved plans bearing the stamps of the Washington County Building Department and this office must be maintained on the project site throughout construction and must be available to building and fire inspectors for reference during construction inspections. (ref: Sec. 302 S.B.C. ) 14. Upon completion of construction and prior to occupancy of the building a final inspection and "Certificate of Occupancy" from the Washington County Building Department is required. (ref: Sec. 306 S.B.C. ) Y e SPECIAL NOTICE: DEVIATIONS FPOM THE SUBMITTED AND HEREBY CONDITIONALLY APPROVED PLANS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION, EXCLUSIVE OF THOSE NECESSARY TO COMPLY WITH FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS AS LISTED HEREIN, ARE PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF THE WASHINGTON COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMEN1 AND THIS OFFICE. PLEASE NOTE THAT WE HAVE PROVIDED A REFERENCE FOLLOWING EACH REQUIREMENT. THIS REFERENCE NOTE INDICATES THE APPLICABLE CODE AND SECTION THEREOF IN WHICH THE REQUIREMENT IS CONTAINED. S.B.C. , S.M.C. AND D.F.C. REFER TO STATE BUILDING, STATE MECHANICAL AND DISTRICT FIRE CODES RESPECTIVELY. PLEASE CONTACT THIS OFFICE IF THERE IS ANY REQUIREMENT WHICH YOU QUESTION OR DO NOT UNDERSTAND. //P Plans Examination Report No. 989 T.G. I.Friday's Restaurant Page 4 *Notes to District Inspector: Regarding the project description, the specifications call for the installation of a "dry pipe" automatic sprinkler system to cc•ver the entire building. Elevations of the floors vary. However. a' l floors whether wood or quarry tile are supported by a concrete slab subst. ate. Wood floors are to be mounted on sleepers on the con- crete slab. T . 2 — INSP. F .`l cr'..TR. . ARCHIT WA.illt'GT01. COU..TY tRitLJi•iy JcPArii��kt�" CTCH1T _ ._ NOII STRUCTURAL °LA�t CHECK 1 .i;. I F RICAYS RESTAURANT one Address_ Pro ress - Washington Square Road, Dallas Tex. 75240 e vin Ain ~ ,\cures: 14665 Midway _ Arc,l i tett Yep 6007 Uccupancv B3 „onit. VN Sorinrier �'er�^.it k1. Plan Chock No. --- , Property Line Set !io, ^s: Fronr Rear Siue�_ $13e Washington Coun y istrict x I Fire District 4a.irluii Aroa i3v (.oJe: fire Zone 5 4,500 x 1/3 = 6,000 sq. ft. _� isiC t, increase for .,nrinKlcrs b�,/71T z - ._ Incree!se for Side YarJsN TOTAL:, Relldinn .,se B 3 Assembly Restr.urant 30I J i n.i :wee: 9,120 , 3rd Floor i!e semen t1st It moornJ Floor nrss SeVerar i .ns t;i. Itat 1 rn:s___-_ 3ccuoency j.fparaticros 4Rt.ttin.;s )penir , HR k,itinc; ___ yerricJI `nett; range vent orridor .;oast. Attic :Wet Stoos 1 -_ ---- L:xits ;t,.qulred: r iocr :'n,i r dor 3r1 rluor 4asement 3-3'0 ' 6'�,' ---- .rCIOSeJ �— air gas c:coiIny +stun . - -- 11Mtin7 ^_Fuel Speciai Fire itesistiva Assn.,DI ies �; n; i-ian before 1 Sprinkler system plans to be Submitted to the Buil `,_ _ _ _____ — insulation. Bryce f,o-rdon' _uat,, 2/14/78 't ant Cxrm i ner _.____-.__.___ .'1 ik 1 Q`'\NGTONicIlltp C,Ly .* 4R,J 4 9Fp/S t IV). November 21 , 1978 Mr. Gene Allen Wier Casady Company 1763b Emerald Street Milwaukie, Oregon 97222 Dear Mr. Allen: Pe: i.G.I .f ridays Restaurant Washington SquarF Confirming, our conversation of 7riday, November 17, 1978, the plans for the kitchen grease hood and duct system were referred to this office by the Washington, County Building Department on November 16, 1978, and have been examined. Listed as follows are applicable requirements: 1 . The exhaust ducts must be constructed of galvanized steel . The plans do not stipulate materials and the original contract documents called for black iron. 2. Those portions of the hood not constructed of stainless steel (i .L. where material is not specified on the drawings) must also be con- s.tructed of galvanized sheet steel , 24 ounce copper or .030 inch stainI , %to, 1 3. The hood, duct and the cooking surfaces below the hood must be prcvided with an approved automatic fire extinguishing system which ,s intertied with the fuel supply system to the cooking equipment to the effect that operation of the extinguishing system 011 automatically shut off all fuel to the cookinn equipment. i • • I T------— •, Mr. Gene Allen November 21 , 1978 Page 2 Subject to the foregoing conditions, the plans for the kitchen grease hood and duct system are hereby approved. The plan have been filed with the contract documents of record at the Washington County Building Department. Very truly yours, (..,... WASHINGTON COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 ,p o• „,),,,,... ! ? Wilburn Dodge Fire Prevention Bureau WD/b cc: W. M. McAfee Engineering Co. Washington County Building Department (2) I • i WASHINGTON COUNT taitkv ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 150 N. FIRST AVENUE I 41 HILLSBORO.OREGON 971:3 Pt ANNINta DE9AaTMENT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ,ARNY K FRAz1r-'' AirEN °".`�", 15031 648 8761 MILLER M DURIS,Chi ^�^ BILL BLOOM VIRGINIA DAGG 1978 RICHARD C HEISLER May 1 1 , RAY MILLER PFSTAURANT DESIGN RFV I E,J: 78-8-0 PROJECT: T.G. I . Friday's - Washington S uare APPLICANT: SCOTT MARTIN T.G. I . FRIDAY'S INC. 303 Park Central 7616 LIJ Freeway Dallas, Texas 75251 PROPEPTY DESCRIPTION: ISI 35RA Tax Lot 1800 FINDINGS: 1 . Consideration of the requirements of Section 10013.6, "Eating and Drinking Establishments : 1003-6.1 Intent and Purpose (a.rdressed in following findings) . 10034.2a. Standards for ApnlicatiaFee lgraid pursuantp to 2401-13. (5750.00 January #35323). b. Pre-Application conference held January 5 1978. c. Application, written statement and drawings rerrived on January 18, 1978. 1003- 6.3 Procedures for Public Notice and Administrative Action. a. This retort %as prepared on the 110th day following appli:ation due to negotiations on the site des,41 with the applicant. b. Findings pursuant to this section follow. c. Notice was prepared and mailed on February 22. 1978. 2. The site plin subrit!ed by the apr' icant includes land- scaping i"mediaf�VEdsniansl'f�rcthuthe parkingbuilding lotthat andwil con- form to the ..pp theatre which are adjacent. 78-8-n T.G. I . Friday's May 11 , 1978 Pone 2 3. A mini-park is proposed between the restaurant and the theatre. The park includes a semicircular bench that will add a human scale amenity to the southern portion of this phase of Washington Square's development and the users of the theatre and restaurant. The sit down area ties in with the theme of outdoor seating at the restaurant. 4. Final development plans for the area exclusive of the lease parcel occupied by the restaurant will he submitted as soon as the restaurant gains approval for construction. The plan should he submitted and revie.red prior to construction of the restaurant . 5. The impact of the restaurant on the surrounding area will be minimal. Its construction will mean the addition of another increment of an already approved regional shopping center. b. Restaurant parking will be accomodated by the previously approved parking lot 'For this phase of Washington Snoare development. J.E.Q. has issued ar indirect source permit for this phase. 7. One free-standing pole siq't is proposed. It is to be made of fabric to characterize a banner appearance. It will be approximately 60 square teet in size and will meet the requirements of Chapter 1950, Sign Regulations. In addition, 8" high wood letters to be mounted on the roof fascia, and 6' graphics to he printed on the west side of the restaurant are proposed. All identify the premises as "T. .. 1 , Friday's". RFCOMMFN;)tTlCIh• Rased on the above findings, the staff recommends approval of the application subject to the following conditions: Prior to building permits, the applicant shall submit a landscaping plan for the area included in their lease. IL2. Washington Square shall submit a landscaping Plan for the areas west of the theatre, between the theatre and krestaurant, and south of the restaurant. T')e plan shall be submitted prior to building permits for the restaurant f� and shall conforr to tht_ concept as indicated or ,he N?iMay 5, 1')78 submitted sketch. 3. Landscaping and other site improvements 0,e11 t.e. completed within 120 days following occupanc,' of thebuilding. ,0a 1 78-8-D T.G.I . Friday's May II , 1978 Page 3 Planning Director's Action: Anproval wits staff conditions Approval Denial 1, signature Date `/////'' REVIEW PROCEDURE FOR RESTAURANTS: The action of the Planning Director may he appeal d to the hearings body if notice of review is received within ID days following the date of notice of action of the Planning Director. This notice of review must include the following: 1. A reference to the app' icatlon sought to he reviewed. 2. A statement of the interest of the petitioner to determine his party status. 3. The specific grounds relied upon in the request for review. 4. The date of the decision of the initial action S. Fee of $50.00 plus $3.00 for each single spaced typed transcript page. X01'1 qv .'-' 4111i,...,Is sWASHINGTON COUNTY OAwl ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 150 N FIRST AVENUE '!/1.1.1 H I L LSBORO,OREGON 97123 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS PLANNING DEPARTMENT MILLERM DURIS O..rman May 12, 1978 LARMY K t•RAVER A;P Orracto' I iiO]I 646 6761 BILL 3LOOM VIRGINIA DA' G RICHARD C, HEISLEP RAY MILLER Scott Martin T.G. I. Friday's Inc. 303 Park Central 7616 LBJ Freeway Dallas, Texas 75251 Subject: 78-18-U T.G. I. Friday's - Washington Square Legal : 1S1 350A, Tax Lot 1800 Dear Mr. Mart ;n: On May 11, 1978, the Planning Director approved your proposal for a restaurant on the property described above pursuant to Ordinance 196, "Eating and Drinking Establishments", and Chapter 120 of the Washington County Community Development Ordinance related to Zoning. 1. Prior to building permits, the applicant shall submit a landscaping plan fo- the area included in their lease. 2. Washington Square shall submit a landscaping plan for the areas west of the theatre, between the theatre and restaurant, and south of the restaurant. The plan shall he submitted prior to building permits for the restaurant and shall con- form to the concept as indicated on the May 5, 1978 submitted sketch. 3. Landscaping and other site improvements shall be completed within 120 Jays following occupancy of the building. ;Airing the review period, one response was received from the notified property owners within 250 feet of the property. i tott Martin + T.G. I . Friday's Inc. May 12, 1978 Page 2 If you desire, this action or the conditions of approval may be appealed as indicated on the last page of the staff report. Sincerely, - ';44.41i11.-- ///eyiLak'•y Associate Planner JSL/sel cc: Mery Blum, General Manager Washington Square, Inc. PO Box 23635 Tigard, OR 97223 Dick Estick 7000 SW Vans Portland, OP. 97223 Ray Weld, Chief Acting Building Inspector ii l . r -) iIi IJ ii' 1; W. L( lJ }kit 0i*IIMee 6 WIER CASADY Ci. it "' . L__-: _ 1 ,. T8� � CONFORMANCE CERTAFCCIA1P4r ;�.�f.. T 'Y � • !•Rd�' ' 1JREf-z HEREBY CERTIFIES • fE UNDF'�.SIGNEI� I19�� -- are marked that the products identified below and on–-- I NS i et UTE OF TIMBER CONSTRUCTION e marStanked t with the Collective Mark of the AMERICAN rI and that such manufacture has been at our plant d and were formStructural +l`+jeconformance nated TWnhe',anti provisions of Ie S vanin Structural G +� PS 56 73, which plant has a Quality control system approved ` moss.-Arketisas_------- p the n ned manufacU.rer further certifies that the work his been Inspection Bureau of the AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF TIMBER CONSTRUCTION and inspected periodically by such Hun'au. The unJl rs done in accordance with the applicably jut'specifications TGT Friday's I•tscfiurant JGS '.,,V'n. Pro Tess i-` .7.c fSrrtl'"-----_—___._—i` ''�_ MI f.11 S Oflnf N NO X44 5 3 -_—_---- —_ —Koppers Com},a n----c irk1 ami na ted Grou p ,�'..nl+f 5 n11fr- b �317K– f]►relity__Assur:±nce___ • Nagper ia.l ,_Arknn t; -- Director ---- —"•011... 4 j�17/1-/f that the said Company at its said plant Is licensed by the AM RICAN HERE£ Y' CI arthepectitf envisions of said Sta.idurd, that the adequacyInsaof t Bureau of AME INSTITUTE OF TIh111FRrIGUNSTNUCT10Ntousf'the AITC Collitive.Mark el respect y control s which inellicomply with daplant ic.+t 1in the judgment of the under control system eflrr,t at sold pl'utt is peruxtically inspected and verified by provisions of vie AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF TIMBER CONSTRUCTION,and that, ( g signed, said company plant Cunlannance with the Standard in is capable of complying with applicable manufacturing and testing res ctStandard of a n in respectcificof products product tie sole ctresponsibility of tt.e manufacturer, AITC's respect •e any specific or partthat thy p traduce a p,oduct meeting tl++'said guaran •e hereunder being that scut col pans/ is qualified to t and that its plait is perimfically .te..w'ted and verified by the AITC Inspection Direr-el pkprOlA �� r 1 ••44 ., AITC �ertiticate No `' 1 0.0 Ili, 4 AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF TIMBER CONSTRUCTION 'ir'" :'—.' ,;A 9r,11In ,.wr SnfNY Inn"11....1' _.... •i '',t , '.