Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
ZC10-82
., ,. 1 n . ,. ., .. r. .r . .. ,�,V.A-,. 1. 1 ...r , 4, , . ...rtl . 4 ,.. .. .ry.. ..5 .J )L,.11„ S•! V1}...,I[-.,4,, i:1E.C,.. ). ,1„•.f t a'3',:f,5 ,.f4r{.1 r, .!.. r1 .[�.1d1: ♦I ,(�I4+ .i. 1�Y,Yir ).Y�x f h ,... �!«t{1 i��a'�°�lltl rF+_�, LF rye. �,,,tltY,,r.., ... tr,'{Y kY X22 L1!'�t�Fi S� 1.yn{ ki 7 Y u,, ,IY r +,>g� �-," rya, 41,,,:,,,,4„,,,,,,,,,,,,tiNl�ryt,1�`� 1t' S11 �t M r r n-,•ra.,�,n«n:,,.... »..:,.,,,, .n....:�:+;. .t ,:;:, .4 •�. . •Yr','i1 aY':t,'r. 1 fpl e',,?1h,fS'i+C' 14 Y�x{4 rp•t' �Hfi',1+. �'1 /� w tt''1 kt Y1 Y4 fgty,?1 I .. ro ZC "�O":0� a )p74 5 .,,,,,..?,,,,,a.,-4,,• 9+117 to it S,E11d'S1p �Y 1,.. : 1 f,A1 1)irr,,W r 171 K4l.Y1 1 1ra,a , L �'I,' S ) tt ........,..... «_...,..,»�,w,e...•�......n.,,. .....,—w.-.,.—.. ........................k.i..,.,««»?M.,.,.....-:::r,: t' ' Wlt4tt�i}� } itn,ii f1� i,..i s�,a lit t'. ay.i+ , r41.A,a X`2.5 ' 5 i L rlyAfi i;,ta k,„ r ",r t'4 ftit ta1 1�}5'tiJcr rz t i t! ,r•,0,0.-.1..,',0i ft 5 11 1 i yE l4 ' �,hitri'ilhl F'!tfyY IQ1Fk 1 t'e,(•1, ,,, Ts (1,• ,.t,%„fro, i Ef i yi'?yj•trti; � lair f`Ntj• �x �1k'Rt ` ��i a1�l�ry _(1; 'i 1+,"i,)',it i,,,, ,tr,ctkr:'t, i c ,. :t,It 3„1) Yr! p,1 401E 9�I 1'`'',,,,,41.,,,,,,,,,,1 /A 11 Y'4' :411', tt 11 1",,g;;;:,•;41',••;,,,','.',:: fe.,t,2, 4.1.';,',1k,tI.,*,';',i":'4i''.'.r j' 1 os A; 1d r ,kris 1,', i + fit; ', Ir 1- L ,rr, iiy afirfl , t pall 3),u"� 1„r '44% k's ',.5';''!,'.44,','.4.0tt,, t .,-1,',..,''''1',..,'.�i: ( 7` r,51�, 11 T? ,Y tdiru s ,t 3° ..1 ,1,,1 .4•1:',04...,7,1 :il i++hn�l ..' til. ,rl 1�K?+ r 11 r 5 1 y 7, ,.�, W it b;G 4 y, 0,"N: ( S,u. .111 1,;1r 1 } t r1 .•.l,t4t,, Yr 1 p,� ' 4?r xv, f,+t,011'',4' rf. y}rN�?F I, r i<5rre,r”, ' ,i xY i u`�I '3I f Ili,1?11 `1 .. 5 > ) 4 11r 4s w Ik f, +qdi 1t• ptL y. r5f li P9 ?pd ,t pi 1,". •r s i. .,0i.,,..-,ii fir 1 Y 51E° Is ''''i.:4,• .�,".::1.a a.,p..w 4*.r',.?4,1,,,..,,F.�..,'.4.+,..)3.t,er,,r r5.,...4,...r y,s,.,[...)a.-t,.k,.,r4V.. a..., ,X.:.:.,r,,..tl..s•i47,e1•.A.,.Y�F,;.r�),..r...,t,f.,.,1,..qn.«,„W,il,t1)1.a..,:.„..s.r.,n,.,li. AE ,, IM sr.a.....,,r,-: ,+ ,,.rd k,�.�.,.1,.r..✓,,...4[..3..,,,,.,.:,n1,w.,y.-.1,.,.,,.,1r.3-1•.r...l,s')J .. %;,'',:,��7. ,1,5x4,1., ,.nr6..a,,5-.w..,. ti-Yl'P.. .. :if:oi1I,�r,;r ,J Ix+>t 1�-'IF.1 ..'4..,.11 r�,:r"sy.,.�.aI,.,r M1�1 5 r1? ,F L• .tEi.„ µ ! �.1 :v... ... .x... .,; . 0,,,,...•, xt Y'�\;r•I,Y I ♦ .$S tr rr �'., + ' ,C'x ! :el;.. ....r +S L•„ r:h:. L. n. '� 1�t k 1 :J +' ,>L „ 1i 5.r�. :� M � 1�EH ., Lkz 'rryitsyt.rt I# ' a. 1 tri i17 Lt+ (".",,'''.'v'43',', l 7�i ,L 1 IL fl tib l !Y Y�I FI tk+14 tri if T Y}II i{ F 1Nlri f t i) .1'.;, r5r}i. CITY OF TIGARD ;fir; � ,, j+ ;,f} RESOLUTION NO. 82- `�'I , N5 ax ,,J'r ' A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL INITIATING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISION �``r+l' Y0. q'ff IS v AND A ZONE CHANGEFOR THE ;GREENWAY TOWN CENTER , 'iae`'r WHEREAS, the proposed Comprehensive Plan Revision to Commercial-Retail and i �; •`I')1:' Zone Change to C-3 (General Commercial) would more appropriately indicate the I '�' land uses for the Greenway Town Center, and, ''t ; t • 4of the Tigard Municipal h �,,'; ly,;4rSection theOCompDehens�.ve P1g (TMC) the CityCouncil mayinitiatey4' -,'y''' Codp WHEREAS, byauthority of an Revision and' `!�'`'"°. L� 1 Y ��' Zone Change L�» 151;~,fir NOW, THEREFORE, Ul k,l {��;�� Be it resoled by the City Council of the City of Tigard, a municipal. corporatrion ''``A' on that: ',./.'", 10',, „ of they State of Oreg ` r,, ,,,or f the asp a« Section 1: The.Council pursuant to Section18.8 b roDCeed) os { ar� arch � ,,o �, Municipal Code (TMC) L....reby initiatesp g ,ti Myu,,;`+ comprehensive plan revision to Commercial-Aetail and Zone' Change to C-3 (General `,`�',,, Commercial) for the Greenway 'Town Center. ;r {'' :.7 Council directs the Neighborhood planning organization ', lr<a;, section : , + '�''r (NPO #� and the Planning Commission to review the Comprehensive ,„, L Ilt Y 11 t 4 r`, Revision and Zone Change, and submit their recommendation to the City Council ;^t , Plan �'� ''+ pursuant to Section 18.84.070 (b) and 18.84.100 ''`. , x,,,,,,k,,':-, 1982 b� the Council of the City of Tigatdt a,+ ,t . pASSEI c This / day of .s/....g....6___0_,...._, r Y �+ YL! ,1, L ,til ry I,' q,l 1� Cit yL�` ,`+`,',, 1L I�,y��•y r 1i.L�♦r y o ga.l.L.L. yy d LVMIA i a/\.C,LI 4.r L', dk t�+r x F , ''',4,�t4t ATTEST: l , ,,,,!e,;„? , 4'fi , , r + 1s • t r” - A/P }geCotde1 Cityof Tile d p �:s , Y t N r i pt1 e+t�kic.r 11'•?,y ; L,�r, fir; y+1X' i,' S, r•:'` {{c 10, 1 w�w a' f i+ t •(1,.‘1':''i,Y• � PESOLOTION NO. 42''. ; X t'i1'i},+I9,: i. +I11.V♦.Y-.:a.',.,. .,.�.N V.,,........• • .,. » • r r,1,•,,...,:..:!, ..7 r ..•:X- , . 5,...♦.r.!- a,•4.t.;�I '^A°,^.:,.. Y M.w_...w ' i.i r...C.,",„r..�S1A.i.Pi�%, $YL1...,..'R.,f.•Yr rYrAW f,.;,l 4 1,1 "�!{ 4a-�"....,tr I}}1S'.�1r.♦t 1.L �1';.,!i'," 4�qH�. Y'1' �•+,v0;,, �r_s!!Y v1° .bt.Y'rXY/p.�.,�e.•;A.�.-Sj.+.r 1,.f'�,.-i.�." , 1�!., 1iF ,.n .r. Y1 S.-- .!;.. 1 r Y: L "K„r:, Hdv,i ,rr,,„, x„w�. . 'mVX �A (rr„r,x.L . rlyrat,ar st., fXa u l r ,% v Akr � :v .1u.�'"toa {{, ,La1t ��YV Afi . rSFt = 1+Xaa 'y , 9a:. 11r, o iriw� • ,{,»;, x ,,�,Y e? ;a•,:.5 r,:l,:..; ...M..,, '3F ,..0,,,,.,.,0,1,,,,,,',. ,,,I,,,,,4;,,,,,.'Str, ,G i, I -d:..: v4,':'.n ,i." t t ,,.R'., „,,„..„,,•,...•,„ r.:. -4ir 4;'< y t' .7 r.._ t� _.:Y� E a as 4JL"t,k�i't��t t�f T:.} dtiw' x ., :',$,;(4N4:'''', , I rt+ rx,t tr+k q5 m }0 giEtitayycl( w jF�tr"1ri) ij {'yrZr ”Ir r,trk+E+';'`4'j;,xr:. .I�..... .,..., .,...;A:. .....,, c.'.... 7µ1M, ',,,}� l Ikr Yr.'.0 f;r j'SYer''i4 • N + . ........ °k �,aha Y!f7. �f'k..!1 ,,.:i, +t•I;,•, A tl� w`' L . + + +A n.7 2 P'trj w i n'�{'L,;ri .eT{. .pry 1 t,t.,� t.� }Y 4 •. r; FJd!n,,.42 ' 4sY:E,C:;s rxr,+itz z�',rM1ti r,,.,A I ,. , '11 fvi t'':-, .,6'r, 4,+!<.(,,.»1, � "I'lt 4 R�xb�r .t�� 2 �� lb;r �,' Sunnyside Estates NPO 6 ZC 12 ;�, I , 14 q+,k fie: I„�” 100th Ave. Randall l Ca ,, 15 2 0 S W �� .4.{...r* 4E1 ^�' .x...r.ti.... t + i� � 1tjlr' }t r;, Fj'j.,!„, q d, r { r;' t}4q Ott` ItrEa t. f1 fL+,ryf:; +1 $ nr i?a}:17 - rjt�l it, r t Yfri 7,Yti 1yYrrr,}+ F}t,. hq "r, p.. rl r 1,v,..ort,,, : rq FR l�J Ni. 4i1 t A: �,„ y,rA r++kf 4°" t''s^a , 1rti R++rlty' wn -.4.,',,,,..,,,,,.„!,17,7:_ r{, i)Atlliai } 7' tr{, yxi i:,y �' irk ,.,; rlq kx 4L:'.. tUq 7 }A Yt'Y,� � r•r I t9"tI I���, rly;, P 1.: ]It 0,"E, Y?' 9 1 tii}r P9 q 1` r�.,1 t�Y4 a. 4 t}r: ,� ly} i. t a Yt rr' }a '.,:1'.11:1',''..,,t` irr; �w ` ,',..,....V.9;',.?: 1,..,,;!..,.w. p}t tIr, rt ,'u,,,,; i a', iYI ' 1, 1 j 'ti. y , �:{^'I l',•'!"'4'..',,,..;'';',., ,'ii w a`«r' f, illy {ihl+._w}. Y9 iL t trl Y�.',; r�f r t.',44;04'.,-.'",, tin I. t ,t, . R,rlp tib t: j'bs , 1(;4 7'SJur�w, rf fir, }r 71 J IIS, rq d" w'. 4G.t+' j i;`,,I 7e 17µi", 9W 11 t, � q 7 r ' ft•'tr t x E rr1 P Y a,4,..'"-",,,:,•,.$',,-.1,;'4044,1'.';',:,' „ P„ ,. ':. ' r.. .- ad h,: Y -.,, y R ,IY .. r.. ,. w .. , .�;r.- ,, ,r ,,r t`, . 1 .rr,: ,4 S.; .l �'� A r 'Jt,L-.t .,r+ , , 1 r, I.:YF _, ... ,f :,. x ,� 3.. w.. �. k 1. � „rw v. r 1.1 �'• 7.t iY } r. ,,..a , w r r 1 ., .,. Y ..,.1 f 4t ( u. I. ..N }. , . , . ,. i T ,-w .. ,.. I ,:.,,:Iwt „ �" '.'x,. rd, ;C;. L".P x.• 'Y, r>. Et a.,,M Ir �.,.. r,.. ., �.4 II t , a ,..,,..Y,.�, ... .., y. ( �+, ., a r;r, t L v r ,+»•.'�...'�.� ',��,iY ..(L.,,.. +.... ri,.. 4 r; ,�. . ., r,. ,. ,fl,. ,e ti�"+1.-'4•:, r k �dl'.,.r ,i,-. ,,,.Y r ,r, _R, Ml t r +P'. r!) 4�:r Y,..i,.,. ...+"�' ,iK,� ^i.t"1r� •t lu, x. _ _ . a... _.:_.. - -Y__-r. _.._..✓' i. .s r:. c. ff _r ..... _. --._. _� �-. ._ a -'i ^• - _ --- _ �.v�. r.h _T� ter_ •- __. _. -a. .. _. . � _Y+. ....'-a .. -. � s~.:_f _.:� _...+d d -..r..�. � "� _ - . . . .-:... �. ...-. � _ . r .. f. _. -. .. �..4. .i _. �-. v .. «< i33_' fib:--'F �1� �' -�. .. u t tr_ a �._.._..3. .a�.J �. ,t .+.....- ... .:._.�- ..vim. �.. x. _ -._- . . _..- �:..-5. - -._�Y -.- v ..- _ ...a _ _ . -' . .-. .._. _ r .. . :_. _�... :..._. ._. .�:+•.A. -.,.. - :.:. -_ ... -ate- ..X. :S t, AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION = STATE;OF OREGON, COLliVTY OF WASHIINGTON_ ss_ i 2 Safin W.: rSarL . being first duly sworn;.depose and say that I ani the publisher of the. ; T-gard_ednisiiMass.Times;a newspaper of:general circulation, as defined j r, Ti 'era by ORS I93 Uma and 1931020;published at r in the aforesaid county and. -z state; that the legal notice,. a printed copy of'which is hereto: annexed, was x published in the entire issue of said.newspaper for one successive and ',t consecutive weeks in the following iss _ November 4-, 1982 _:".._, , g .., , (Signature - Subscriber andsworn to=before me i v 15 day of a November X8_2_ t 7.F... .. :,T, ' . fy/ __ ,--,„ 7 A x - - -.,-, ..,.;,T.:". .:. - .-- 'otary Public of Oregon �- commission expires Feb.- 24 19.J.:3_§. . s =:::::%:- s% . --r-=- T s= ., , .. .:t.c. r.: „ '4..1'2,', r . . �, 1 , :I It, s. a /•d, r , ,.a r- , f .' '' .:-..11 V. \lr.t•' ,.f lYel. 1 �. 1,. 4 .! # aJ1 Yf .« r:.•r, of ;, .d° .t� ,,,, '.; ..C` ' { t' >r�,Y bY" by. y drS jr{1• f Z, d P ,t,0,1'.'t` ,k 1�r 4 �f''',. 1 r u1e M1j�,fii 'LLE s''0 �� ), r +t N '''1,':ICF''''''t e01}. } ynG x "p a`�, al i,� C4tP , l{' 1+11r y � }ri 11 Yl: 4 J Jot ,4M ,c;, tk a: 1,4 ill .1,,„ r, Ik,n, r,' 4 d r, 'aKtk Aa`. rY"1 I i�.. LL'..+.�]BFpF+�v^ i'4Gnhp{idW,rf rNYHMv i +,w ., , 1}, ,a f ,r: ,�' "`" ,:"''�°" »d r'r i �p q, y i y '� tr,1 11Z,4'}it. c,.1 p 'I# ���, � 1 ' t„,,,,,,,"� f I yyly,yC Hk A ,F�{'G ��1(' y;ahs[ I �� "� ,YrfY'• �' ,ry fipi �b .s" I ft t1� 4 M{�APt7�/'ied (� he TIg � ,. Ti" 1f r 1 l eo "�+� �C 61�nM1ISitE^ 1 '`.1Z,.. .1 9,%n`''.,(1�.'oci-'of J ' 0 E�T^54,•0 (�;��9 f M1.0 ,�i:,.b ) 9 W. � :4'. 4 1a p tM .bt � u ,14.,4 w I t Un w Y a a, , { I 40 'rte(y' r ."n1'Fb n •t � F i h.'`'. f� M¢ e r• �j�`1� C qty ,', ati ;:� • ,,vii, Plan aiag and, vv..c p. ',, f7 , i N '1 4; rr ,1� �EVfR#t1q r/ 11b!AErV/x` .A/rlr./t'�l,.�Jyv`4Wl�AYU.I "RdA �F v sr;r.E . ,.,, „,,,,.,,, „,,,e;„4,,,‘,.„ ?.' '� F ��yq ', 1 '.�, I , !': + ^I�I.. Ne��i �NPO.:.� ± ,,,,. ,.,* F,'44 , e ti ? r> c u a rK uti i arily t t e#l nr�tcommission's Y, ,�,�Ir"', matter to-tn bn��reviewed by'`'Council pu ziant'to` igard unici al 42de Sector ,' tir�r 18.84.250,46(1).0` is matt t wit)be heard pd ant, eaSection 18 8e 290(b)ane.' 4'.h.'',k e lew wilt tie confineda t e recur tdi ,o 'the,,pryyece)eydin � } a y, jencef' { argu etas art' „ pare nt t a' tett 111 be 0110w b‘" oh'00 84 290 ',Such arguments ' ., '+y� rz sub fitted toted Ctt Acca dei ndt`lei t in lie, ,' priorrta': i>icl ,� ; can tder`a ion. rl ,, n cil cp lac idn ud ll 'Sr r.1 staff and;parties o ;polis ues. r, r n +"11�� � a� tf t rN ii,}i J' 17 Ca w1 4 A��1`LsJ IT M!r'8' J� S� .�1� 1� aid 1� J ,, m; ' sotto Dune n of the'H Gari "OS r�lc` r' Lien 1n f S 1, ;'f a„, a ueal bar gyp . a tD } ' ' ' lands permit requeststo excavate and till within the 100 yearflnadplain at to05 ilr kn, 7y�y��7`t/�/pith /�1� {��y�y �yyy� )ry�t�y CO, {;�y �S f� Y`� (� yA`{' yyq�yy � 4 ■■dy'hilt if��ll}, S L�aY flue (wash,'^*p. oTa Ma S1 13AJ �w1 �1 �� !'�I a matte to l �i,Y�a; �reviewed r t,by, c ounctl ,Y,ou�uarit to Tigard' Hunts al e�Ude' Section !w �;d :g r5n(b` l y; r �matter t to beunn;r(I pursuant t0$e i b 4 , tel# ll at6� 1� 1idi. 5, t rc iew l,be confined,tO t e'1i eeord of the{4 u,,din Y. No;n, evt cnc r�r1, ar rr jj//��yyn��{(,l�cnt t b Ise,alloy ed ■y�■we er jayrtjiie!.s,ati nv�ite o sj /f fm7�it �r pe{yny,, ,; �M 'i"_ 1 T �l� �,�T T'.�'�/y M'Ij#!1�1�)T�jf� �`�,R���Ir1.1T1Y..:'�IlrittV-�1� F'�r,l a sg.tguttfc,only pursuant t! Section t 84 260(b) , U ' ,,, ps is sb011 ,ho alturnted to the Cit�r':Recorder not lees than ffltye it)''da , r O r In uracil:, .0„,,,,,•,, a,a ; �enstd+�ru torteDuring''� un it.co fide ati n noun l , '40i'M1 staff and parties an li s ,r ,f;�'� ,,,,,.:1,� &' ndd arLies PX bf9,1 'REVISION CPR 4 4 JB BIS`}1C+P NPO ` r,' ',, A review.b Cityr Gout c l> run` to 'Ek,,,,I.,,,,, i, �p►lrig. nxl r le ' ' v l`;.o `a regU t bBishop or it"�r ik stn ' , , t�}f,r 'tan ry ton fr�orn CoXrrir ei slat profe lonat;ta 4 e"ne t Com ncr aI'`on 'd ofa ti ` Map� t C C," d # �t �,1301 900� dComprehensivet c�+ t from , 1 ' t i Co mercial IPrufe t),,iior Commercial to General,Commercial`pori e,, rf`n;s t a i' CCS ' ,°ei ' w(��Properly I los ted on the x t, de t ucli c+: l''''',1.''.''' d,r; Highway a pproxi xately 1000 acct sou,tyh°of`Garrett Street” �' „�e, ' itte co a enta re,encoura erl,plc c'sub iit,to ttb' It ' c c t If theabove. direr in: vans tit lie r in d e.4, sl,PP 4� +�fi 6 V A 1.wat"�"','PublishNovember 4,`19'84' n.; ,d i ��",r V :; ... }fc., a,.<an i5lu+Krn,i.dlx>ti..da,rodni..M4,«ra.".x+,dt,74i+,+n.,”.vaew;warn"+wewa,..ecaak4i.�n.,1.wt rir»s,MtroM1.mkrt�rmm�d„�rv\r»r;r:,*rnmaw+kfixrrnmFe+rA, ..;1.A�1ML-w'„V..d.+ie;lrm•x”—+.aNxn<r��AnaM,,.ro„r....,. ,, ,It,�,Citi p. it Nat 41;1� , (!'..''''1,?''i , .V ': pi ff tai'' .it Jf yu' f?t�r ,;i 4. i;lt .r pk ki ".1'11!,,, h 'rel Yr fry } a 1 r i'¢'6.' t , t �lkl 11�i r , }I tl b,41i 14�',.iE '0,,,4....q:-,,,,,,.,.,: 1'..„! ,,. F y. ,. '.:•.41.. St. a S ' r •,..:., , r.r.,! '.w..,,'; r 1 ,a ,.ry t ',•Y"1 r,re r ,.yH , a ... n,,mow e w b : ..:::. ..,.av,+a al,.+,«, v q�+, a. � , f..ro 'da . 11. �"-"r'I ry^c^, a^rr' k q i or , Ntl as �,1.';.,. a ,.avtq ,..„F ,,� 1 N al+f. p ,,, ,p.. E' J• ,r r,'Y, 1 t , rr',',;', . t( 1,, r,,,, pY E4:Y 1 � '''f ..o >..,. ..1 . k x. ra: .. ...1/ , ::.. . « .............. v....:, x A K.,..d a d9.. tit�,i t tv� f,..�r.c, :r,4y, d r., , 1:t d:: Itis`-a.�,!,' .Fk e. '41;;14,71','' ff� :,. ., � ,t, ..a. w. Y , yy ,..: .. . .....�, .... ,.,... +..:. ,.r l r ,,,. L:,... t,.1,,' r � Yri k",..r • 'P. ,,4,!,,;,,,,,,,,,,,, !'.1 -� 1Y. V'1 N ±p ,`;i'''' ...l., V �i,. , 4..y ^'..!.. ...:,. •.I.It._.Y,,`,. .� .. . x :.y.:Y � ,...,Y < :.. ..i .. i:.�„ ,fb .�:1. +1 � a 1, Ir ... .., .,•ry . .... 5.!. . .• 1�� , x...,,::.,., el., ,;..,:3 r. +.«,.� �.,,.._.. k... A .r�., ,.r.-i...t!„t. :a,9#,.. ::I.:,, .:,,. ...k , + x,,d, e1, ,.t..a , ,liYa,r '. �iE:- r ae tnR8. .ia,f9a,.r,.�-W .,. �l w ':r.� a�..k'�, , ax': dn: ' -1 ., « xt,..r,.e., � r�.,. .f •... , a a}t,i. 'd' w c E 4._ .,_ d'' :,i••••.1.,`�Ex ,,,,,,y,,,,:, , . a.,yF .. v����” n J .. . . t -, r .,�... ,• 1. 1- 1. Ac j •., ✓�. ...... .,,. . t. . .-..:... .«S. . a... Yt., . ,. I. 1. nr: � a+ . .. ,1 V. .t' Z r .1• t "s ':-r,• .,r r .a<. .},- .S. >.r., ,,, .r,.t.,,. ,z,.... a.. ,r r..,.n,, f: ;,,r;1 rrr v,.,.t,;t ..i,. '14&:',.;,;',.,, ,�.. ,>.. ... .tLvof':� k .c, -� � ..•,��-1.� .�}.!:1.a,.t<+rr.•:,r�,.•.rv,, M t'; r ,fiS'1 'yyy: '"t'.'-',0.,, Y: yl+ 1 ; ,..1 i) j t6 N 5igi k :,gyp; 14:,f 4,�t ? iyJ' k+ . fit"„S x Ld,. '.4"44i d is 0;',A 2_,- ) ; 0 /)”" ''''''''''',: r`�G int $o;, , ,q4,,,i).;.•0 5 .....-y , ,...,/2 .: ,I;viL AFFADAVIT OF MAILING 1 x Eu t ! r x'; rt r0.Ns 7 ,L QQ i tf; STATE OF OREGON ) } ,. tit�,y , art County of `Washing ton )s s !>•� rr, City of Tigard ) fo fnt477r,5}I t ,1 , 1c 'y,r � d�� I Go] tteabeing first duly sworn, on oath des ose and sayc � � „1. y �x1"..•:1',11 ✓:. It That I am an Office Aide for ,;.:,',,i,,',',, ,, the �Ci ty of Tigard, Or:gon 4g.,,,,, That I served notice of hearing: of the "`' 'liA �,•t'+. Tigard Planning Commission !`r' Ihx,1 , ryrMarked xhibit A) upon each o •rhe fol owing , '°`�"' of r�hich, the attached is copy � ..'..1,!„; f::P'•, ., daY of " : , 1982 by mailing achy. ,<+ , named persons on the ,wM' y 1 4,y4x 't of them at the address shown on the attached list (Marked Exhibit B), said ;>ti &' N; notice a hereto ata; , P . - ` },;';. h, ,, re aid. „ ched es osited2 i� the Ung ted hates Mail on t' " e 198 , postage prepaid.r"' u' the - ` day o �. rei Vi AtyjiG 1�. x1�7{t Til;": kit: r +rrp, + 1/a,}t lr L e,... .... ,t' its ' ,i t,j : `'i 1:1".':‘,..",'1 '; , l+ q,, 1 f ,,,y,�1 at t !'ts b ribed and sworn to before me on the 4 _. day a: o+�typ,}Yt h: .470fa tF'i , r° c r; 41f+,y'1" 41;4y.(2ek,:ia,..i.: ,„' J n Yt OPn fi, i f t " fr µ 0.P' nst'n,}. tr ( I /yW..'..W r" >f'16 r i;3. ,Y I, 3 w. it I ...):. 1- ' 1,, I+, u, r '?1',.'',.:1'.',4•'!,q NOTARY PUBLIC OF a ,. R etry.y : : ;q',. ,a,fxk; •4 y�"'t to '" ut,'• ,ii: • t _ I�. a I, 5r �7 Cor�nissionpire::« ,,,it at,, ,r, y 1, nt ,,t,:,,,, FYI; ti4+ 11>3" �1 iJ,tr r,mA a: 1' i t�: iylq,, l I t, X1 1 - N ,Y ','.','''',141'',1. i 11';i4;.:1':.;:::411,',1,':';';tx ' tr°� t m.,ap„ r., .�f 1p , ; , Y • • ••• ••• • : J„n,7��. i rn. ,,, , �, 7.',•-•,',:•,'..:.. ,.+: ..,.,. , .,,,,,,,,4",:.,f,•' Irvr �.�1 rs s *��; > .,":,. ," .a+'':.t.'�.,Vtvt �v L t k et, „•••,2,;,•,':,::•' , ,A 3�.. r J” 'r.f' .. a „ . ,....,fu - .N. w , .�. r J. ( r , ."n 1. 1 t i t' x^ ,I r •A -K,.o r ,, .,. , ,� , .;.'4, ! 1 ..a S .t t. rr 1.1 u ‘4',',‘,) K . M1,. ;u�n. . ',,r;.,,,'",!".14.4:. 1� ,� .eb`. .i. b.�•, ,1 ,..> i, ,: ru tr d,n r r: v ,..-,, l .1 - nl,.a ti �.. „:".,'.,,,,,p, t ,,. �.,, t7 ;?;,;',44. ,. y Y n. ” �:, .,t ��)_ �. :F.....r. � ""' ,. cr, ;'� li�.t. s' .L.;-� „ � ., u, +.k,. ,r. ,. tt ",, ..,ar: +.Y .1 n.la t , ,4 . R :..,h r ., .It . . w ., 1 ..,n ,� - , k ;et; ,-,Iw ". h �, .. x . dY, •5 ,A I , a ..� i:�,u•r .t Q• 4�,. . ".t.,.,,i,':,,,'1,1.. t +.. ., u....;......,, t,V. .. : 1, ,l �- f. ,� ,n.. ,, i..:. .. 1, N ..,.. �� �.,.r'.t•,w tt • F.a, f.r, Ili r. aM1, '� r. ..,x 9,.,..r Y rtf M,�::'. ,,',.11- ••,1, ls.• . � ....�. ,'";,,,'i'•,,- Ya , ,n..,�.a.•-,I1 :+.'•.. tl:.,,.•/ . .. �:� r,:}�, F, C� :�',� 4 '� . ! if t ',`o , .,le ,,r..� ,i I`.. rtV,V.,,,,......,., ;:::,..;;...,,,,Azgllit,...".,:l.(,....;tt..,......,::;.N,0,,,-,4,;10,A;,,r,,,,,,,, -,0:,,:',,•—•-•••••..o',,,",.,, •,•• •'••,.• , • • • " ' ' .',......,'"'',' '''"'''''',..''''''''''"'''''''•?'''''1'''''&',1'''-',..,!,:!!.',4"'4-;,'..',,,,ii.,'!•9,',4.,:i'..41:=',,1:4..:!;,-...;:t-iA,,,4•?:,,•.:1%.,,:,,,,P,4'4::',14A:',,i,V.:,:i••z1,\:,t.y,:,i:;.,,i,..,,AT,;,.,,3,:ii ,',.,,,,,,,. .,p..,,4,,,,„,,.,,.14,,..,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„„.__,,,,,,,,,s,,,r ,,„,i.,,,.„ „, , _ _, ,...,..,?1,,,. .•.,....a.,”,.,,,a,..4,,,', 1e.,....f.)..160!.,,,...',6.J.,.0..'..-!?,44;.. ''.1',4..,;.,,K., f',.f.f,,','',4•470„, . Iv•-"A ie!,...,,.,"i'lr:;44-;,,-':; :,'•?;l:t ''7,?,C,!Ii4"4-::;'i.•,;, ,tcki; -,;1;ig,,,',",.'g''',*-10 , '.',Ii"•"0 00,-e,i'l, ,I .,,.,4,;•-: .—. ......0 5 (It ' ).''' !e< • i ,‘..V.'' P , ,,t),•. ''';',I.:',P,-:'1,, ' ' . ,. ,,,.4.•.• NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ;,,,,:,,,i,,,I, ....',7.4.o. , t2 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT TEL TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AT ITS MEETING ON MONDAY, NOVEMBER 15 , 1982 AT ' 7 :30 PM, IN THE LECTURE ROOM OF FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, 10865 SWWalnut, • . . Tigard, Oregon, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: , ,,,o;•,!,' APPLICANT': Robert Randall Co. OWNER: Same a 9500 S.W. Barbut Blvd. S-300 Portland, Oregon 97219 FILE NO ZC 12-82 and S 4-82 Sunnyside Estates NPO 0 6 AN APPEAL by the Robert Randall Company of the Planning commissions decision of denial. for a zone change ... from R-7 to R-5 and a 25 lot subdiVisiOn. LOCATION: 15280 S ,W„ 100th Ave, (Wash. co, Tax Map At'4,4' 281 IICA lot 900) s.. s....sso s 4,.. '14,,i,t;4,:',., NO new evidence or arguments will bo allowed, However, patties are invited to submit written arguments only pursuant to Section s .,.,t4 *,;,'.q.f.‘'Y'7,,," 18, 84 , 290 (b) , Such arguments 8ha11 be submitted to the City s. ,,,,,,, Recorder not less than five (5) days prior. to Council cOnsider ation, (See Map on gaVdit60 8ide) 4, .. 0 . ..,WILL ...._. ..... , .,...., ...... .. , .. .., ... . .,. THt PUELIO HtARINO ON THIS' MATTER I . Et OoNDUCTto IN AOOORDANct WITH ' ' - - ' - • - ' ''''''''. RULtg OF PROCEDURES OV THt CITY COUNCILa TESTIMONY MAY Et 80EMITTEb IN WkITINO 10 Et tNTtlIED INTO THE AtOOtb, .0 . 1,4 , . VOR VOTHtiINVO t, RMATION, PttA8t OONTAOT THt CITY RtOORDER Og PLANNINO DIRtOTOR . . , , .. is. , AT: 639-417/ CITY O'V TIOARD - 12755 8,W, A8H, - TIOAgt4 OritOON 5722 tornet. of Ash & Eutotiam , s... ,., 41 ,.",,' ' -',,, -,., ,cJ4; ,-, - i1 ,:;.;4 , ' .. -,70'". ,.",',..-'f,t.' . , -6,.,'. k ..4 ,, , I Ii4:0 * 4 '1%` ," * 4.„,,,,,,:,:4!;. 1:,'1_,.,.,.lit,'f,::,.."-;.,:„;.'j,,, II n .� is 6 .1 ,.. ,...,, y _ ... ,.. .. f:,t 1 i t c .. S.. r .,;t '..:e,. .r ,•.'<. ",:.. .M ..,•J., .. .. /R. r W.-... .. t.. r� i, r .. .i U., .. ,- .-, 1'}."�•a ....r.. ev 1,. t , _a. 5 Y(. 71. N I.. !. � :-i Iti. . , a,,. ?.nA.. P�. ,. .. .. 3 �... ..... r ,{. v x .{.t ,+,. ..•...:, ,...� 2 ..>'„Y r. .+.., +.. 1.).. Y. rr d. 7 , ,1` �. f M 1i.v >,: b r ? .1 Y 1 .c..7..: w ..,.,, ti.,..1: M avt. , , Yi� f s l� -Pv ...,-, , .1 � ,;',','V,..),,,''',10'.4"-c'''''''''''''' , }, v t !!� a P. t .ali , .-,� v,r a:,•.,:,.. r. a,+.71,:..M1 e.M..,.r.1t�..ri l t rr,,..,....{r, ,..t.... u4 ra.-... 4.-... ....a l.., , sf ai. M..v Y:o ,..;;.'Y.r.. .,,s, .J..•„''.A,A,'yL.....l.S�.., .n.r ,!ft.s ;�.f. F arvL .rN,A. ..t r;. a ... Y 'viF"yG 7C tt,� njCnpy 8{, J,711 `4..%''V 'I Cr,",tor,!, .�?:,.:•,'4,r,,`' , t�f {; r�'"a �.�s r,4` rr ,,y a _....__.... 11 i( Irk 4ws3VCt r Y 1,F { "a �y�, (( 1 {�J'ul Sv far-ti f.Ul 'i���'.� . RV;EU:. 1.ouuu f).14i �� 1i,h1flnd III". - Clit> . ,r r„ �` �. ' t: `"` 15020 .W 1,0O tll k, ',�� ',1:, .r . l'!� Tigard, � l 1:vard �)1'(! 7oll 9722 {a r Iv l.ig ird, Oregon 97223 til i ,ft,,..)w , 1,A,ykT s rw P ;k,{ Th Robert Randall Company 1512 I i 1.00 xo;,—,1 ,? ,,,4,,' `l ',1;; JONES liTG1,1N t�1 ;ia�'1 9500 S.W. t�arbur Blvd. s-3o0 � J 10020 S.W. i gh land Dr h '" 9$85 S.W. Sattler y 'r, „��' �aorLl.antl, Oregon 9721 f4s,.. 7, K Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Orego... 97. ., J tla,11, tee," '''''11' �� l., C'irf, rj „' " x517 16200 �', Waker Associates Inc. ALLEN AUSTIN ;0,,, '��4�, 11080 S.W. A11en Blvd. ' ! ,i.� 9955 S.W. Sattler Rd. 10040 S.W. Highland Dr. I r 0%,; Beaverton, Or. 97005 tr, Portland, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 c,;'; Y• f l( Vis' � , t, 2S1 11CC 15200 16300 ,Tia,,,, a,� Phillip A. Pasteris NPO �� 6 WiVf 8935 S.W. Pinebrook St LEVY CARTERS ,g �ti�,�, ' 10075 S.W. Highland Dr. 1:0060 S.W. Highland Dr. � rekl 4' w Tigard, Oregon 97223 '�� Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 :,''44:,t';'''''' Irw 1"A,4 Baa., 251 11CA 400 1100 ! , 16400L.r rJ 15300Y,t' kk , i;al OT.00MAN, Patricia IRELAND ANO r+ '. 15195 S.W. 98th Ave. 10065 S.W. Highland Dry 10080 S.W• Hi.ghland Dr. ;;'" {,, g OregonTagard, Oregofl 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 0' `r, 111,4,;;', <,4, Tigard, 97223 • x,,17: "'i srL; {r�v `,slur t{,'g : ..1.,!.'0. go 4.1 r ;. a{'' ''r 15400 2S1 11CB 170?_' "� k41�a' 500 bao goo ,�t`;` MITTELSTEDT EISEN ULWELLING '�° , tJt ir, flit , Tia,,` 9880 S.W. Sattler 10055 S.W. Highland Dry 5165 S.W. 100th ;titit 1 ',t�• Ti and Ore on 972'l3 Tigard, ORegon 97223 F' ,� r, Tigard, Oregon 9 7223 g. "'' raf 1t05S rFti, i,rti',�:,t 15500 171 ,',44`; 800 �n]ry�Yp9��(`7 HENDRICKS ' Y U1Gil\l'1H1V is ". EEICHERT , 9900 S.W. Sattler 10045 S.W. Highland De, 10125 S.W. Hoodview Dr. y i,," Ti. ard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Ore. 97223 k}t, n�y Tigard, Oregon 97223 g g R ,tii� 2 ,� f kr�*'. 15600 1712 '';. +�r`iar 1000 MCCLELt,AN NG BISHOI. Or CARVER "'' k ',, OF PRESIDING r �.t CHURCH Or JESUS CHS.IST Taos 10035 S.W, HIGHLAND Dr, 10155 S.W. `HoodvieW f� ,' 4r°,' 50E North Temple Re `Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97 �'' ,1,�, U'te 84101 FY"ir sa1�t. Lake City ;�� 71 4� 251 11BD 1502157000 . , ` , rf�n,, li: YY, r'. VIAL William r'Y VIAL S.W. 98th . e. ,g d Dr. 10185 S.W. Hoodv� W bre ,v, 14: `.,11,r 10025 S.W ll�. h1�n 1�, 'Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97.223 Tigard, Ore. . 97223 �,`� SIG a; v' y7. r! r, ak' VY r',�,;'.';! 1504 15800 �, . 17. 4 NT GO' nt Ik '7k`K''' MC QUIRE ..ELO TMC T ,� CAtSTC,NSEN Hi bland Dx. UNT DEV r, v S St. C g 0 S W. Wal ut f , r+1,t i 9975 S.W. att�ler 10015 S 1.la7rd �(� 9 , :1,0i Tigard, Oregon 97223 Ti gard, Oregon 97223 ;, ,`'l'w 1505 15900 1715 R 1 tti ''�' ' dOSE j11SON 000PSR SC SHL w,v; ,;; 100C 5 S.W. kt .g� 1s.titl Or. 15285 S.W. 100th ' r 98G5 S.W. 81 Tigard , i � ����f7t�rC�, O1°t:ti�lf�i1` ��722W� �,� d{v, rl�, x'41 'l';ti ; ird boon 9725 I.1y« t.d; 0Cegrt 97228 t +;ef „et -0"' �r,:,.,,d;A. r v,,,r....,, ''nr1�,,:1e3r ',,. 1,,..:J; ty,u,r-..k,,. 4 0,4nJ....:•w,,. Yn _S"I..ir n,J...�,,.,Y.a,e,Y ,, .:.,..;yrf ths-..pj•9{M1rR.�»M .»�w,r!w��a },7«f.,.M'1'.». J,1,,..+' "4"07.} 1 ! �,,.,.:.:,..1,-,,,,1.141,, a_..iP i-+ntWii, ,v...3¢i'af Ir..,?a...F,.1 ,a `;I i C...1.: Y 1, q, 4., i. +fi.=�Ia Idr • r11 � f:":"r„y•t r.a .. r, r1 .r:.fir!, A� ,,5�r w,a.a. 'id�Rr 7taw d„u.d., CC°”'r' « {„ ,.r,14IQt, ri•r t"'f,i{a�f!{:�.{,•',, ''g';',''' �hrrr{M,.r (1 A '.,. vi ,. {. ?d,;,.,, .,.n..r „. G.:,� •..:.:. .r.:, :ry.,.. ;-. a.. :.a v'..Vl:. w: n, t ,.l,Y,,w r: .; r. M.. l':',.;‘ 1 lVyr,1 , ,e ul '1;',;-')..1'i 1r1tNr , { r - +rrAi Pry e V • ta: 0.1 p pial t f111 rpt. r�r. v l,' '';':::::,,,! f1 fh,kaa . All �Gnt l jdrh ,,t (l k '441111 HI ��;Y 1.Y 4 , 11�,� a 11,,,';;i.4 },�,S Is;,,,,', it CI '. 1 4 F T1' .1 '4 ''' '6' ,, tt;x November 30 19 82 ;Vit; xWASHINGTON COUNTY;OREGON w, lill:{ Yt,i r,,.; r Ura `.,,, rr r e w,r,�.: yytdx7 Ye,-* Mr John T. Gibbon, Secretary Counsel: 1,1 °1'; The Robert t Randall Co. 4, Y; r Kristin Square 9500 a.W Barbur Blvd. Suite 300 `: !� Ylr Portland, Oregon 97219 �1, RE: Appeal of S 4-82 and ZC 12-82,2, Sunnyside estates ec,t},3,{. Dear Mr Gibbon, ,:, ,'''::',1-f:',tl t, '', This letter shall serve as a reminder that your appeal of the, Planning Commission's decision on the above named ;, Planning t,,,: pp .. eard by the Tigard City council ori !,,,,A' , application wi"ll be h at i.,:,,,:0-'.tx r`� y+' November 15 , 1982. Also, please be advised that Sec -ion ,� }Ir"``"'',trk l8, 84.250 of the Tigard Munic .pal Code states that the '` Council reviews shall; be limited (see copy attached) , , 4,2f i(c l , � ' testimony. may besu'brntted 4', therefore, no further wrtte� October 5 19.82 Metter I , rrlHt page three o yourlj t�ir In addition, on '1Yrr`•i'kyou requested that representatives of groups interested ,, pp t,rl�,}�, and with expertise in the issues Lai.�ed bythe appeal be �, Yl, ,�.. Y presentations at the hearing. Again ,. rr, permitted to make oral g Municipalyour request must bi due to the Ti and Code, q t ;: e'x, denied f1, A}k' denx i) 'd ,IY " Y . .. further as$ Stance i,+, Y���"�� If you have any questions or net; i I ', p t l rr0' pr� please call 639. 41:71. ,,, 1r4r i;.s H +�xtr �,i IGFwI t 7� +r� S3�ncerely, pl 3!r'rq`' (la. r 1, ,e,xw ,a4 1,;;:,'".3.4',,4i • fC r1r William AMonahan 1:('' ,4,►, , yti Planning Development meet a •` '4,..0..,,,- . ill,,,,,,:, 1d6j., , A+�� to i ��, r I,,w' �P" �t:, WAM s dmj alp,/, P ani , Y r enc l til `x a` • '',..,'4,,i,-r;'!", '.1''! r" 1 ii y� ;, tt rr;N Y a 12755 8W,AsH PA bOX 23397 TIOAR�D,OI180ON 0' 228 PH 539,4171 . . ..T.::,!;;;,,,,,,I at .1:1;,',1,ik' ! Y R ,., ,. ,,.... ,,,,.,,,., .r..; '.a: rh,,. {�• S ;!,,14,, fie, ,..4,i,,,',4,11.;;,; 'F�;','.1 't.+' .. .' '.„'',1.' ..,.. .�. .,.,:. :,.. .., S '14', .... ...; Y I ,y ;,'..4„,-44,,,,: i�tl, 11 I`t.,{+" . ,. ..,, ,:.. ......�., r- +.. .,v«-*t"Ri"N� , ,+,nN.e r r, E, M4W.. ''a .Ar Y i,� .,i`� r,'.):4,' r.�l 0 .. ,ih,r rl.• w ., :...",',1' „.: �'- !',.a .x.. i... ,, „ ,”"f"'x ,,,, r !'t9,,"�"n` r! x':. .. .!!'.,';,,i4,,. r ,, a' 4wt , i 1 �.is ,., �.... •. .., .a,,..,x .. .P.. 7`S �..w ,, •. .,s w� e1 .�.,�y..y� ,r. ,1 .. � x ,,.,, �„-.a _ {.a. �,. .,� a, ir.> ,t.y..i.. ., „..,.ryr+�v�, ..,w,.va". r .1 Y 11 ° .,r..•..y. ,,. �} �,•:,...1.4,•�' { �� 14, ;1 t.. ,'G.,M r r,�.. ,w Sl,l .,Y 1 , ,•W v...., .,t ,,PA,,, ,..,.,.,4 y ri w..,1,. 1 '.:5, Y ,' .., .a.., ly f-. ,l.,p s c .,.5 & d w v.w l: .,w . F �a�w 'i'• r 9. ... 1•'�;,' +.tl�.a C, (( ."t 1• w s 4, x 4, ,•,'� ,$+ t{. 3.y ��{ .IK��:is it M'w r. � l. 7 ,�,. ��+ ii'.1. i's �,: r wt:��"i E .+`1��,.;t,i} r 4- ,1,$.04,4r,;,,,,-.,,,,,.,:...r.. ,t.,1.tNu,i,•..a„.r„.,.J.`I.r,t , rr..,.,''+ 8..1. , .f. ..,,1..1 ,.i.Y,...A" • \1,7 ...., d,Y.b,„• .If. .,l. rt s., ,.},,....U..,..Y..,f Yi. ta4.�;1 ,{r,. ..,,r}�...r,..,,fi.tr.f,...+:r3..,,.l..1) .Y 1. i•, }' { a r a ,a, . .>.....t,.l1 ,,...Yd ,.t.f. .NF .0^ „ ..I!l; ! ^ N IAVe \h .,:§12,•'b �� '4ily' V.A. + t' f4''Ni r',art, 1 r r ki t +Ir S +'11t' G11 a NNNUUUiii I 144 b; i� t �t q;� h . ... ty o'Oert } ':&•,,,,"41,!,• .4 R�i yd} a ;1`,1,‘;',,, i ” i. ,\ta.! 5 t . 1 rR t' t` t l i'�Ya trt ry tdr '4Ch ,., t1, 4.�,'+i.I �t; -i`, 4 company fat tia• f '',{".!;4. • - . Portland,Oregon 97219® (503)245.1131 �i>; r 4, t t �n t+4� '{; Kristlri Square• 9500 S.W.SWBarbur Blvclf ® Supe 300 3 tr tir^;4 r�� Telex #360557 ,, f},, f ',,.,1,,',.1',6, IYN l�, i +,, ,, c;19..., �r�R4a$' Y OP ' j�L7lbi.>. ��,/ rJ �a /S., IW .1,,:, ,,,,,,,i.,,t;:,,1:*',,,,''',i,:t:'1 li�t'f i, 1. f!'l0 1,,,,,,,......„(. .October 12, 1982 I `,„.,`. .141)Stib , g i. �1 r1 1'' ,4 Y,, Liz Newton, Assistant Planner Ids. I'e "tali City of Tigard S11 F,r : 12755 S.W. Ash - P.O. Boa 23397 t ' ' 'Tigard, Oregon 97223 ` sir , l 4ftr f 1 Dear Liz: [ V , F x+i 11 J 'ii sa, appeal fee dor the. Sunnyside .Estates �'. � � Enclosed is our check for the d matter. Please notify us As soon a8 possible when the minutes and , i,, I1tr � hY the transcript are available so we may make further presentatiol,is °`� p Y}I>uii,y 1 t},r+ 1, based on this information. r'a 1p '7affa ifs y'A ,r;. Thank you for your assistance' on this matter. , i'y+ ,1 incerely ours fir' iw� ' ra �,aft il 4�5 ,,v,g...!. v. h -. Ik 4.. ;. ,,,,,,,,,-,„44;-;e f '� >}i John T. Gibbon i,,,,,,,....-,t,';',.( li} +I d Secretary/Counsel t �,I t.1%!••,,.,,, y ,i,t, I+ by�.+4"1t-a ;rt"...4,',.'I!': e R " 'x yL.1 �j,4K:4'.4::., I ,i JTd/to j ,I ..',!!''''111=',,,', 0 0';'' ,..., '4,.. ). ) . 1' 'j'. .!,01'0',4.. ct Wl,14, , .+ � 16i r r1 !rrf,� . 1 , �I J„lw,It, ,,1� r II / M rt 1 ',' i P,f17;, {I. 'e, 41vp i u a ly y fir. y)� Yt Y 4. i i,) Y �� , { N k }#4 i,,i 1;” E as►{ I...,1 • + `I. +r + Il'� L r{r.hlf,n W f.'�fY "+4'J " e^4 ^I x.,,,, „Ii;,.. , u r.:;.•-,,,,,,.. -,,,i,,,,,,,, w, ?w„+, ,, p,}4w,,,,,,, rt,i.}. 4 „ y+y.,,t�yy.y,n"�vttA ^14,a p 4, ,i rl f h, , 1 y,4,!.,.N.• +a'i:.1 4.t , ...,:. .. ... r.:. ,.1_i,, S"'rl ,""S, `.'} : 7.. ,. n�. ,I , 'Q .�...,„ „i.M , aal• �I.. d' {, , : . ... .. r.:.. ,,.;.,0:1,:i.' ,-: :rr :....;,-„,n.,,4,,,,',,,,„. . ,.t , d �, n� t+. � .., ,. !" < � 5 i � .1 a ,• N, ,n , 1 , I.✓.., . H.,, �^ , „ . 1 .h '.'''''.',.''..*/, ;.., e i:V ,-. � A. { r;,{, � Ik Iii, t, ':),;';',.',''.,,:,t1." �:) !{N �{. ♦ .�. 4 rw.�. ri. ,f 1. , � �, 11,,Nf`: a.,''''''4;;;1,,, � _..,, . ,t.t ,....1.';, r.,, :.. !7� .�' .r5� •M' ..�, „4 ., a qd „i,,..., , f:<I .:b.. . :,;t.,,.„ • . •..,, ,• J.,•. FI'.. , ,,, i .. .h., �. Y i ,¢ ,�i.1. k.. � �I 4�"; !, a "'r,:�r�. .r� ' ! Y., , ry.(, .{-... P..j.Y,,r.N !.-a (.a l,,i 1,. . ,$ � + --...1+4Y. „I� 1 � f i.,•.•..�1,l,. s ;b \ ! d� ti'.f... ,...� r.1.. a..o, � ::G.\, .4. 1.. �i.r.,., ,....,4‘....- ,.u. f...r.�.,,,.-n��, .... f..,, .f .�,. ..::, ,1�..j,,''.11.,t.:''.`%':', .. .a;R^¢n`^ , "�w° ^I;l:.... , .•t ,1 `d r { w.t % ,4,, ,, ,, ,„,,,,4,,,,,,,,, ,1/4,T. ,,,,, -,% ,r. c :..r »r M ,.. 4 .. ..... .w. ...rt 5 tr�.:: ti� t, ✓ .r 1..a'. ''''''W* .i «a t.. E ....r ,... a, r4�. t is +. r t k d � .d, t.. 7 rt- '�...L d t 1 c r .:, � r. F ! J.r„ , :V X.r, .u,,-.t rz v.vt,r ,+:F:. ..:..... ....�.,I. .., ...:-.,,.. . 1 r.. -.. rrr4 11 r. I. Y rr Y1 7 t% 1 r:l r tr. ,... , r ,.: .,...r .t y ,.i s.�e r.a,rr �( 7, r '�R tyr �1(r{ `', 'k -y % Aw'.1 ,�1%1fr :�ri. 1C.1 H " Ii i1+1 'tl Mrl' �,1 S.'1 ''''P'4lP ,Ifino ,, the q'r the obert• h air, r ,.— , , : ., 4,,, company r Kristin Square 9500 S.W, Barbur Blvd. Suite 300 WJi,y , b Portland,Oregon 97219 a (503) 245-1131 •ki, rTelex #36055"/ tJr,„ L 741• ,i I' t '':';',i t1 IE l .. „ , „, „i„.,,, Di„. October 5, 1982 „,,‘ , OCA' 1982r, " r , rt . .. r To the Mayor and Members of the City Council �� l"lh" C/O William Monahan L/� IC Q11 rkf`�4. Director, Department of Development 'er`' CITY OF TIGARD ',i ,, AP,,t:, P, 0. Box 23397 !' ''''` Tigard, OR 97223 �3 !fit v,, 7,( ,A``- ,r 'Ni! if 4,4 i;'.., NOTICE OP APPEAL, 8-4-82 1.,'1, ZC - 12-82 - Sunnyside Estates r. ,`15280 SW 100th - 281 11CA Lot 900 t (M ,, de '^ '' Dear Mayor and CouncaIpersons; ,' t M , rr11 ,, ,.i.'1'4'” This letter will serve to notify you that the Robert Randall Company, the ! t' t"Y applicantreferenced action, hereby appeals the September 7, },, r,,,v."4. 1982decision tof thePlanningCommission. The applicant pp cant requests the City :�• C•• ,,d C .. M i i gCommission i i ...•• .. lication ,to Planning Commission with the R-5 •r, pouncxl review the decision of the )?lann�Yco�dionion• and remand the , ;‘th 1that the • •zoning t,Y;+ amiedltonnosmorerthanate 60%for of the site provided that the subdivision o71 be (a�1 its lots of less than 7,500 square feet •1 '1,, "' or a maximum of 21 single family lots, r% 1{l� t rr' 'r 14' The applicant notes as of the date of f September application, neither the minutes ht ,,,.1.:';„ ; ,�a�%a + nor the transcript of the heatinp y 7, 198 is available,,.and it fiV therefore t it', requests the opportunity oto submit further written testimonyupon 4:`„ �(Asrt the availability and review ofY those materials, The applicant's assertions r'o' regarding the Planning Comm: ssa.on t s hearing and its deliberations are based .,'_, 4 t3,„ > xpy �Y+4�,, On its own notes of that meeting, ''''4%,,,,, 1..,14 the issue is of course whether or not the applicant has submit- 1r' a►1 The crux of .. _�. ted evidence r permit g - %' ce suff,rcient to the zone change from R 7 to R to occur d ;iM`%1 PlanningsConuna Commission earl felt that willdemonstrate_ , y ,.' E that While the Pp ,�( establish,. ;,, y while the applicant has net k ed that at the densityof 25 lots t originally y the zone Change 11 all'” proposedga1 ty ,; was appropriate) .a. conditioned utilization of the R-5 zoning Would be ap . , ,::, propriate for the site '. 1 rt ', 10 aY ,,d iL r Y 1 ij,,,,,,,, c W.,,r,syC....3,,,...1.,„,,...t=.”ar n t.,.,Patk.t::.:.a:t'. �hre.„.Nd.,d..r.,.�a! 8 ,ra� �.t%..,,;..t,,...-r¢e.•ry:l.a,«...:,..,,r4t..t.,.„yt..r,1w.hr ay.....er.:.-r•t,?.,.r�t.r,.,.......,:,..:•,.,r..:. «+.1., r...:r�.«rr.:.tr ua ,rww..;p,,-...,r«',., >,..„",Mt':..."et d�Av6ir: ,i;,( r1fi.4,t.,n,r ou�xr..e.,y."„r.,.. �u�N.,i?t�.d.:A }',�rut�rt�,,.� •4�t' r',,,,.i,,,, d l,rr'.tJ.t..(Y.r,,,t`'y..'t",%�+,k r,r,aMt.of„4rr N!..:i;;•q,.+!4f1 i.Nti'�ilG 4,1 t71%. ]'..L•r'�,:A W � '1 "t t« t' r, .,1.,''...,.! r''''"‘ 1 11 \``,,L2 '''''',:.'' 1 ‘V•Iiit To the Mayor and Members of the City Council October 5, 1982 ,.,,. „.. Al '1 I. . Page 2 .1" Fik' •'1'1.1 While the Planning Commission Chairman indicated the applicants plan re- .'et quired more justification, he also indicated that the site did require a careful consideration of the transitional of nature of its location. Such ,..‘,..,.,, a transitional character can be achieved through a mixture of R-5 and R-7 lots allowed by the conditioned approval. ,,,,,,,,.; '4:,•,,, ,.....),.... The applicant's burden of proof in this situation is clearly to demonstrate such an approval's conformity to the comprehensive plan for the areathat WP. of NPO #6. ,,,,.•..,.: ,,T.,........ . v The staff report on this application emphasizes that the application vio ....,. .: lates Policy #2 of the plan requiring 4 units per acre or 7,500 square ..!,"...1 foot lots. NPO #6's policy number two also suggests that 12 persons per acre is an appropriate density for the area. When it was written the plan assumed that a household population of 3 per living unit was normal. Cur- .--,....,:. ....0 - ri....4. rent statistics demonstrate a typical household size is nearer to 2.3 per- ,H.,,... sons. A condition permitting only 21 homes on the property would result in an average density of only 12.42 persons per ac-e. % 1 '44k The application conditioned in such a manner should be carefully judged against the currently approved R-7 plan, which allows 19 units in the area, ..„, i...,/ ,',..:)... including eight duplex units. Its impact is minimal in terms of an in- .,,,..0 creased numbers of units and it furthers several of NPO #6's other goals. . ...,„ NPO Policy #6 which emphasized the construction of single .1. -:.,.../% f.k. ....,,,-,0,.... family homes. - NPO Policy #7 which recognizes the need for buffers between various densities, it this case Summerfield's 4,500 square i 1 ,. v •, I" ' foot lots and the larger lots of the other neighborhoods in the area, a fact recognized by several planning,comm •04,,'i+1, ,'.',11 1 'n 11* While several commissioners suggested a split zoning for the site the 4.. ap- plicant believes that a mixture of R-5 and R-7 densities across the site is more appropriate because it permits the greater utilization of the areas south facing slope(in accordance with NPO Policy #8,) An approval conditioned in such a manner is appropriate in relation to the ..'......4,' applicable LC0C Coals: N.,.,..,- I s M Goal #1, in that it is responsive to the NPO's input concerning the Single family character of the areai 4' coal #2 in that it Te8p0h8O8 both to the NPO, the staff and ) con ' the planning commission's cern regarding the ever utiliza- tion of private drives, q.' P. . '•' A conditioned approval Would permit a design for the subdi- F,„, ,No vision which tal(es account of, in an efficient manner, the existence the private open space adjoining the site, en- hancifig coals 6 and 8. • '1'4 '' 1 ''''''. '''t''i `',A'''''' t'' ', '1' i....' '' I'," , .,'''',", ;, '''/ "1-7,77,--,„-.1,7-7,--,i-r77-770:74..,,,,,; ,,,,,,,,,,.,c;.. „4141,,,4,1„:,.„e„,,,i 1::,1 ,,.,.4,:',,,..,,,,,c„i''.,.,,1,.ifils,:t4,1,4,,,' t .. . ..,. , u a J ,.. �, 1.:.. �. !..4,50., ..� A.....J a,.... e.. f. .. „,..r. a r9.. n, ,,r »:4 'k5 .. . F.. / L m r. , .. .. .' �...>, .. .,... 1,.. a... .. , t a.r ..,,.. f ,,, .,. v...,.--. .dr -..., ., r9,..J a:{;l- x,a..lL.. ,'f. � w i r'. �r .. ..A?. � arr,tl . .r.. ..Y x :, .,. tr ..... ea. . r. r n., r.r;. r s. ?A ) .f r '-'t tl ti,.t�� e. J.. ,.� , ..:',,A.,.-'.,M. �. h .:-.0 , .s : �➢. O ,� .+v, . .u.... .,. .L . v r AV.' 1 }i ,....i ..�. 1, t: ., S a �t�� tl 'iy r .i. �1 trR., i,,.t,.l a,...,.. ,: .t .,„*,,ti,‘,:!,:,15,..1 ,xt..1, t r n ,c.r . r 1.. R t,m•. ,•4,a , r .. ,^�, r,.. n �G. , ,S r r. •,.,•. ,.,. .,.r ...r..,s � Sir •� „S ' -, ! P r, •t ^r :a;, •,k x'..,,,,,,,,„,,,e 2,a ,1, of fo f dor ,, rw 2 t• tS .1,.$‘',S1.1 dfi t ,ter,¢,, $a tlf',, ny"• r{Z 3, a 0.7!'l‘ ,' t.rJ,Ott'. rai p�l t,, iv ify 'SSA ',44 Sri, 'toil """e + N (7y Ny d" .tit {r!�xA the Mayor and Men?hers of the CityCouncil. :it,{� "i , ,,, To y , ,,,; ' October 5, 1982 r" At i V4, Page e 3 Y �,f r"!`'Y - A conditioned a roval of this re uest would -ermit a re 'bF`% x;+„', p ,;,4‘ { design of the subdivision to moreefficientlysolve a �':i- ,',1f serious drainage problem previously identified on the `°r' !, site Goal 7 is therefore addressed, • r`,4`; • ,'i,tr, - By g governmental restrictions on the de- ••,S rem. , 'ng'n further overnme ';f,, velopm:o of the lots, avoiding the duplexes conditional ;C' ,.i use process, it enhances quick; economical development of s i 4 1! the property, addressing Goal 9 concerns. ;rj en 1a''' - 0 is furthered y providingew i .4'"JL` W ]owerGoal 1priced, homesites for the oref preferred�housingaal- �', ��t,tt' ,_ ,, ternative the single familyresidence. ' �� Goal 11 is enhanced because a re-designed subdivision would ' r `,< '1 s g ,%,,.+tKt �„ / at% produce+a more efficient sewer system utilizing a closer USA ;1 ).,, i ssolving drainageproblem •tiy.. connection as well as the discussed ar y,',,,., above rErtr, i,,'�'.. The Planning Commission's record clearly reet '' ��' improvements s ro o sed bythe applicant, improvement of e 100th, ; x Ct y p proposed pp p twe ' Sattler, was adequate in relation to Goal 12 '- the t1 Kablepand in the judgement of the Commissioners. +,, '$•iii, Y i Y Transportation on Goal ,r .14 f�+s� - Goal 13 is served by allowing a higher single family density '%` ';','',;'''';‘:',,t s :,,, on a south facing slope where greater potential for the use of try. A ,fAt' solar energy exists. ;: r""�;; Goal 14 is furthered bythe gof vacant land within a , i �,;i - infilling ,tr build uparea at a density which is reasonable in its transi- 01 et is•'tr= tional character between a higher density PUD and lower density 1; A'4�,r' single family homes and underdeveloped properties in the area. tt”: 3' tti 1 1 t a.s apparent from the comments put forward presented �. Commission in , is deliberations on the matter that noopposition „,. ,!, under cut the applicants basic proposal. The question ,,, '`� at thehearing to r'' ,7 was sought oTheaa tlicantmbelieves®anaap..:roval�condaitioned�onnawm3xture 'r. l h f, ty Y,,,' of no more than 6o% R-5 sized lots or 21psinle family homes resolves `',` gfamily ,it",4,;,, the transitional issue. A choice between 21 single homes or 19 CNC "'�,�'r'' homes including8 duplex units it submits should be resolved in favor .,. p - in keeping with the character. of the !f? �{�� singlep � ���+ t"c a neo hbo.4 ho od I ,- %' . Nt of the familyhomes as more lC h,pr tt� , ae Lw `lhe applicant `respectfully requests the repz"esentatives of groups w a � � ,yfJ,. seriously interested and with expertiseby this to', �fY c'' it the ,issues raised, ”: ,,w; a' "cal the Metro Home Builders and 1000 Friends of Oregon bepermitted, i' ppg 7e,, 'to, .,t ;alt, ,,y- 2, i '`; hvi .,1',,,',,,,,,,,, Jart i r' k. n.,, ' Hp.r Y ij Nw w r t r ,a" , t n ,. tv rt:; 1)wj tit, ,4,�s z: 1, , r .t tr...,.:,�•;.",:r,,.,.,...:..,'..,..„,.,.,.,.., F..;,,- . .::,; :.,:.-,..:-..,,.� ' :: ,..:n:.- ,,.,.-:'.i.,»..l.,..;_x..,.-,�.'d��' ! ._.:'r ,...:. .`-; ,r ,•,,,., .':,.,'......, ;,t q.,''r�,, ':':.,,•'.:!,1..... :..,..: M1 u �i?r,N t,. . , "* Y , a 8^ �, �t % `. Y"�µix lt',1. a y .+ilr1Y,+' " ,, ,,, r,„ '.1,'+r..•r i� . , '” ,.•4,4a".k' e,a,1l' ".+ �". nY,,iA , ip,'xV,fa 'a. {rw, i..;iyiN4fj ,'",''''''',:.\471',1"77i: ',r1 nrt 7R„ l! ,.4 j,,. NyI7 . [eYlt,hi ,wnF" r" Iykn7;rdri'+5OF kW 1 ,"b ".dr ,. -r!r F1.: L-.: e i L 71 .1 }.NS .i D' n �.:1... 1�. '•i T/?w ..,. ,,. _tr ,is ,,1. v +1 n '.c, . t, . ., . , , ,.ata.v .t, .• . ;v� 5.., ,, .r : , , " 4 ... 1.r Y ,.. t,..x VV,, .� r ..,. , ;',,1,2,:,',1', ,,.5.1 ,.v, .,S r.i' \ � .J^ pe_..a u. 7 .s. . , . .:.r.., t,4 .�..l n } •�; .. s:...s. h ..Y,1 e.-:.,.,... +, .',,,?.1,:',4. . Fa 1 ..� Vr ,1 1 1 4 in n. 4 ,� f. 1f���,....a .. l' 1 �,!rm...r si.: l�.l5,.r,. i .X , 5 n,.. s ,,i„ �. .'!¢.. ..\ ,.t h.,. ..,�r ...}n.. .'r• .•.t„:,,s n rth ti.,7„Y.; ...,..I.;,.. i...,.'%�rf,(1rri! 1 y. s �w 5. ,i f}.i�Y1,,t.t Qi,a`; � vY •4k Sf,.7 Y,;t5j' ��yy :k?41,',,,:',';;,. 7G Y r•; iy i.�?r • I„ga.S IN 4A1,s; dY. f d lett+fY` ..7. �_ ,, ,r, a, ,, ,�-}� To the Mayor and Members of the City Council i`' t ,t r ,�,. '' October 5, 1982 sl r fes: :11,,,o�: Page 4 ,e .),JA,;, t yyr�„ Nr `a. wr\; � to make oral presentations to you at the time of your deliberations on `5 j rdr } I1 y'2 „„ the matter along with the representatives of the applicant. We recognize ,r# .,k,;,,,,,,,, the the same opportunity should be afforded members of public tr 1 I Ulic with opinions ,R': ” .. on this matter. x3,'a Respe tful ly submitted:, ;N �' Si+� E.,: \ ,..._________,$),4 ,..,,,,4.,:q o.., 1. \l !!,i.),),',:',.',':: MI 1 :� , �t'y`s' J- n T. Gibbon , r,,r`,L ,W Secretary/Counsel ' ;� „rkiJt'" JTG/cl 4; M G"5' t 4., li'} 'i. 5 ; irt i q, y-.. a �r a.� , ,,,,r; 4V r }1, t 4a ar: Y 1't: 51 vt„' xr` r 1 �3 , , ” n a' t.. SC' 'Ve k�\',t» Yttt r4..'''tit. „rya r w 1 1}5;i �W: :),':';::.'....t'' A/,)' 'JI .r."°„'''''',"';'" Nuts;'"1. f�N�. k‘,..1'",',...., rt°: t,, "1\at ,„a yt ',‘4,,^',;';',',",Sr S! •,r r�r, ,raynl'r t"y,' a J'.v , ',::::i'',,, 1',:.-7.,' "p y' b 5 1 'r 7,,,..';',',I.19 4, 14 t,,,, oM',�YK 1' I',.` wilio 4 r a 4. 014 ( F ,i, r ".rK„,I,..,”,�I N.`....r,,r..... '�,e•,..I,1.<,...,.Ia;o.r#..-.e" .,..,+.Y.,",i�,,51d."+_Ji..s..�1 .-.,..:,.* ,...6.u�.�a9,.t•.rti7 ., "w!J , r,:tyrt>t.*:.•";,r.,4fLL..r,a .a""";,r r,,Ir+"7,;;;;;., .w�s...:�.,,u r y5 ''':i'*, ;:t.r+,.-:,: r 3 ��f I .rF_e."�# tleyi VP'y' "'p tI+�S'Lb!" l:;-.t.,� 't''''44'14:',''.• .dM1«r' w.,i",�.w A:'1:''',1.' :i,a'rr'4,..4'4'It,.."., Ir5 t.,''''''';..:'. .. ri • lI ife...4.‘"? q--I 7-71-- r" .‘ ,.- r" �,'� the ty • ��'robert ; ` '` r.',fit "` n ,lis,`, ',$1 . ' /// .,,., ... o ,`, ,$ s company Kristin Square 4 9500 S.W� $arbur Blvd. Suite 300 a Portland,Oregon 97219• (503) 245-1131 a ' . Telex#360557 • • _. if 7i i September 16, 1952 Mr. Frank Cirry, City Engineer City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 } Re• RC-800 Gul.fside Subdivision Dear prank. ; • As you know we are in the process of redesigning this subdivision in order to provide for a more logical provision of services and develop- mentpt £ � area. While w had hoped to have resolved this issue by timeunfortunate delays have however occured: As a result of this We therefore must request an extension of the bonds M for the completion of' the improvements in this subdivision. t We sincerely hope that With the assistance of the staff in regard to this matter we can efficiently of the area, and limit ,tie length� stions about the development resolve 1ve �ue of time for this extension Sincerely yours, ' ,,,,fL4 --7---()/„/1) , , ... , ,,,, ,,,,, ,,, ..k..,v,...,,,,,, ,,, John T« Gibbon � Secretary/Counsel °M1 {f f JTG/tt " • •:, • + f /. fit } h,v; n ,..,.,,. ,. .,.•. ,,.. ....... A ^ ^ , ,., r• , .•..tu.,.,,�......-.,m.,..•.,....r ,,. .,.:w ....s.«,. '•, It w� A <.r 1. h A .,. / AAibex--.«m..e..4_-rr......�..........r,.. r.n_... _.1....n..«....o-.... ...-.....++.....v......._»J.n........_...,_a+.e....nrt ..H..,. r n.at..,.,+......�.....................n..m1e-.,.,. r. ...,».a.«...r.. ..-r....-.«...hf.--.r..._.,..a. ,.....r. .............. na .n. .._.,:.... .. ....- ...ra- H... ; ! ?ri/S114 ,,,,.. { `. s STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 5.4 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 1982 •- 7.30 P.M.,"1, FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL - LECTURE ROOM 10865 S.W. Walnut Tigard, Oregon A. GENERAL FACTS CASE: ZC 12-82 Zone Change Sunnyside Estates NPO # S 4-82 Subdivision REQUEST: The applicant is reFamily residential pp requesting a changerom R-7 to subdivision Single and sappino approval of a 25 lotsubda:va.son on 3.89 °'. acres. ;, RECOMMENDATION: y the applicant; applicable Based on information submitted NPO goals and policies and staff's field investigation, staff recommends denial of ZC 12-82 and S 4-82. : APPLICANT: Robert Randall Co. OWNER: Same 9500 S.W. Barbur Blvd S-300 Portland, Oregon 97219 SITE LOCATION: 15280 S.W. 100th Avenue (Washington County Tax Map 2S1 11CA lot 900) r► LOT AREA: 3.89 acres ot support the tone change from R-7 to R-5. NPO COMMENT NPOe NPO feels 6 does nthe zone designation should remain as R-7: that ►"g ' rurtlzer, the NPO feels that the flag lots and increased density i do not sUit the character of the neighborhood. The NPO voted a Lo support the original subdivision plan for 15 lots approved ott February 20, 1980. f..,,. BACKGROUND: On June 25, 1979, the Tigard City Council approved a zone change ge from Washangton CountyRU 4 to Cityof Tigard R-7 with conditions Z0 12-79) On February 20, 1980. the Planning8 Dioctor approved a 15 lot subdivision at the R-7 density with conditions. (see attached 8W-5--79 staff report.) :' AREA CHARACTERISTICS: The est � �. g areah" been cdimarilyas single family residential. The Churcho� ittay Saints lies direetly to the south. The lots to the test and north are developed to the R-10dansity. The property to the east is vaoao.t, SITE CUARACTERISTtCS, g house and garage o the site which ` existing There �s an e� . i will remain as a part of the new Subdivision, The site slopes to the south and ,is grass covered. There are on the n a te�r treesriorthetttportion of the site. y Nrksof STAFF REPORT ITEM 5.4 ZC 12-82 & S 4-82 ;. Page 2 B. APPLICABLE PLANNING CRITERIA AND STAFF ANALYSIS 1. LCI)C GOALS AND GUIDELINES a. Citizen Involvement - The purpose of this goal is to provide the opportunity for citizens to be involved in all aspects of theg lannin. process. In the case of this application, all owners of record within 250 feet received notice of . .fie time P and date of the public hearing on this matter. In addition, a public notice was published in the Tigard Times on August 26, 1982. b. Land Use Planning - All applicable LCDC Statewide Goals and Guidelines, NPO # 6 Plan Policies and City of Tigard Municipal Code provisions were considered in review of this application. c. Housing - The purpose of this goal i$ to ensure affordable y housing types appcitizenslicant Y ofthestate wideThe subdivision1proposed then p the ant offers proposed byIp single family dwellings on small lots which may reduce housing costs. d. Public Facilities _ ,The purpose ose of this goal is to ensure that adequate. public facilities to the site are available Sewer �.s from an 8i' line south of the site at Highland Drive and S.W. 100th. There is a 6° water line in S.W.. 100th and an 8" water line in S.W. Sattler. There was no storm drain plan submitted with the preliminary plan. Vire hydrant locations were not indicated on the preliminary p plan. There was no response included in the application from the Tigard School District indicating available space in schools to serve future residents of the subdivision. 2. NPO # 6 POLICIHS y The maximum, , development. . Polic 2» overall densityof will be four dwelli Ir,square or 12 persons gross acre. This amountto�.aestandard n units p per of 7500 s uare land per dwelling unit allowing for '' and � feet of other open space. Some areas Will have a lower density owing to topography, existing development patterns, or the desire of individuals to own 'a larger lot. Policy S. Residential subdivisions will be developed with paved streets, curbs and gutters, street lights,..:and walkways, g according to city or �' county standards. All Utilities will be placed undergrou Policy 4. Development Will. coincide with the provision of public streets, ;h water anda sewerage facilities These facilities shall be (a) capable of adequately serving all intervening properties as well as the proposed development, and (b) designed to theet city or county standards. • Y , ',,.;1, . * I . ....-.« y.«... ,r,.«..,.«._.°.b. '..0 '` .-wy ,.Lwy,r - a Ai..r / „1I'r d STAFF REPORT ITEM 5.4 ZC 12-82 & S 4-82 _ Page 3 Policy 5. Planned unit development will be encouraged on tracts large enough to accommodate ten or more dwellings. Planned unit development will permit a degree of flexibility in design that will enable a higher , quality of development in accordance with zoning standards. Policy 6. The single family character of the area designated on the plan map as urban low-density residential is viewed as a positive asset to be retained. Projects proposed for this area must be judged according to affects upon this character. The density of the proposed subdivison exceeds the maximum recommended in the NPO # 6 Plan but retains the single family land use. Public facilities and • services are available to serve the site. The applicant has not requested the PD designation. 3. TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE PROVISIONS 17.16.100 Tentative approval. (a) Within sixty days of the date of sumission of the preliminary plat, the Planning Commission will review the ,plan reports of the agencies listed in Section 17.16.090 and may give tentative approval of the preliminary plat as submitted or may modify the plat or, if disapproved, shall expreOs the Planning Commission's disapproval and reasons therefor. (b) No tentative plan for a proposed subdivision and no tentative plan' for a major partition shall be approved unless: (1) Streets and roads ate laid out so as to conform to the plats of subdivisions or maps of majorpartition already approved for adjoiJ'iing property ertas to width, general direction and in allother res ecus` unless the City determnes it to be in the publio interest to modify the street or road pattern. ' held for private use are clearly indicated on 0; (2) Streets and road the tentative plan and all reservations or restrictions relating to such private roads and streets are set forth thereon. • (3) The tentative plan complies with the comprehensive plan and applicable zoning regulations of the City then in effect. (4) No tentative plat of a subdivision or map of a major partition shall be approved unless there will exiat adequate quantity and quality of water and an adequate sewage disposal System to support the proposed use of theland described in the proposed plat. 4, STAPP ANAL/81S After reviewing the proposed plat and making a field investigation staff cotiOUrs with NPO' # ti that the proposed R 5 density is incompatible with q . surrounding land uses 1 'urt �. " t1er, stya f feels that the lot configuration and acessee proposed in the original proposal (3 5'-'79) makes better us of the property `0 STAFF REPORT ITEM 5.4 ZC 12-82 & S 4-82 Page 4 5. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends denial of ZC 12-82 and S 4-82 based on findings as follows: 1. The proposal violates policy 2 Of the adopted NPO # 6 Plan. 2. The proposel is not compatible with existing surrounding land uses. '.41 AP' Eli a l eth A e Newton ,APPRO'V'ED BY s Monahan PR :�RED BY: B1 William A. Associate Planner Director of Planning and Development • • nr+1 n. IV • MINUTES NPO #6 ~~ JUNE 17, 1982 , • 1. ) The meeting was called to order at 7: 39 p.m. 'k2. ) Roll Call NPO #6 Members: Phil Pasteris (Chairman) , Don Quinn John Ar:rigoni, Jane Miller, William Frederick, Marge Davenport I Bob Bledsoe (NPO #3) Guests: r John Gibbon (NPO #6 member Randall Co. ) , Mike Man (NPO #6 Loretta Mike Sheppard ,, member) , l_,ore Allen, City Staff: Jeremy CoUrsolle 3. ) proval of Previous Minute IP -- Approved as written 4. ) Golf L:C-1=t-e';') JohnG '•, n representing the Randall Company presented three site designs. 'r * Plan A was presented to NPO #6 April 15, 1982, and showed 20 developed lots * Plan B was new and showed 25 developed lots. This was a variation of Plan A clustering flag lots. * Plan. C reconfigured Kab l e Street to a 1°T" and provided 25 developed lots. The NPO reviewed these designs and indicated the flag, lots and incrcter of the neighbor hoodeasThedsity aid not proved plat for' that area, fit the c NPO then reviewed th e ap It was noted that the approved provedplat was sig waS different than Plan A. The main diff significantly the orientation :. of the flag on lot 11. The following resolution was unanimously passed NPO #6 favors the original approved plot of 15 lots with the potential of three duplexes making a possible maximum of 18 dwellings . This will be presented at appropriate Planning • Commission hearing. 5. ) Review of Annexation P . cRe t ,�► JeremyCoursolle reviewedthereport>- . ... ;. and said that the Cx.t would now emphasize the annexation of some b�i t5 and piecesir of land vs an oAlso, • 1d lox" of "large e area's annexation. p yg theCity will hot approve extens a� on of USA lines beyond city - limits unless annexation applications have been filed. Continuer , 1 ti .unr •,.,_ i,,. , '.y.,, .. ,,,,:. . .......+.w-i. w.....,.r w...0.a..oer.+.,.... ..w k" � .._ y,�p rwM" 'N 1 114 , STAFF REPORT FINAL ACTION TIGARD PLANNING DEPARTMENT Tigard City Hall 12420 SW Main St., Tigard February 20, 1980 • DOCKET: SUBDIVISION, S 5-79 (Golf Side Estates, Ref. ZC 12-79) . APPLICANT: ROBERT RANDALL COMPANY OWNER: SAME 9500 SW Barbur Blvd. Portland, Oregon 97219 CONTACT: DON DRAKE, PROJECT' MANAGER, '1 9500 SW Barbur Blvd. Portland, Oregon 97219 ' APPLICATION r DATE: January 25, 1980 4 SITE L. g-fl /Pitd) ' # r • LOCATION: 15280 S 1001 , southeast corner of rattle an 100th (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 11CA, Tax Lot 900) REQUEST: To create a fifteen (15) lot subdivision on a, 2.89 acre parcel n 1 in an R-7 Zone, "Single Family Residential" y SITE j DESIGNATION: The site i� presently R-7designated R-7 "Single rP amity Residential on the Comprehensive Plan. " p send, zoned and. is • P Y i �' .. t, PREVIOUS ACTION: - by the applicant for a zone map amendment from .. , q WashingtontCounty RU-4 to City of Tigard R-7 on the subject '•,` site was approved by the Tigard City Council, June 25, 1979, with conditions. (ZC 12-79) - A requestby PP . " r . r f a subdivision . , plat o�,�a,�he�.�t��ec.t�sa.ter�vaslta,bled by the Pp ' prethninary s, 7 ' Tigard Planning Department in June 1979, until a seWer easement to SW 98th could be acquired through the adjoining lot to the, ease, Tads Lot 12100. (8 5-79) I. FIND Nd8 OF FACT: , 1. The a r'plicant .s regtiestingP � plat approval roval in accordance With . , . oh 17:06 of the Tigard acre ., into ,, � ., Code to subdivide a 3 89 Sec�i j a,gard �ui�3.ca;pal ,parcel into fifteen (15) lets With a min .mtini lot ,Size Of 7,500 equate , .feet, tour (4) dwelling unite per gross acre. • 4 a 4/M1,, ,. .*rrr .i-..,.rw ,.,,.�, ,r' .........»......rw..,«..«,.r� Y r v •�hq ^f fir' 91y • 1:;,y }. STAFF REPORT FINAL ACTION TIGARD PLANNING DEPARTMENT, February 20, 1980' Page 2 2. Applicable policies from NPO #6 Plan are as follows: Policy 3. Residential subdivisions will be developed with paved streets, curbs and gutters, street lights, and walkways, according to city or county standards. All utilities will be placed underground. Policy 4. Development will coincide with the provision of public streets, water and sewerage facilities. These facilities shall be (a) capable of adequately serving all intervening properties as well as the, proposed development, and (b) designed to meet city or county standards.' 3. Section 17.06.065 of the Tigard Municipal Code states the following S P criteria for approval of preliminary plats . "No preliminary plat for a proposed subdivision and no map or major partition shall be approved unless the Planning Director finds: (a) Streets and roads are laid out so as to conform to the plats of subdivisions or maps of major rpartitions ahea' dy approved for adjoining ing property as to width, generaldirection and in all respects, unless the city determines it to be in the publicineresttomodify h the street or road pattern. . . .. (b) Streets and roads held for private use are clearly indicated'. on the tentative plan and all reservations or restrictions relating to . � .. . streets : . the o rehen. .,. such pr,ivate and (c) The preliminary platcomplies withfthe comprehen ive plan, the applicable honing regulations, and the regulations within this title. (d) There will exist' adequate uate quantity and qualityof waterand an adequate sewagedisposal system to support the proposed use of the land described in the proposed plat. 4,- The site has one single family house located at the center of the proposed subdsionivi , with .access from. SW 100th. The site slopes downhill from the ' northwest to southeast corner, It is a vacant field Except for lines of trees on the south and west sides Of the house. The house i.e served by overhead electrid lines front Sattler Street. ti 5. Surrounding land uses 'include single ,family housing to the north and westt a baseball diamond and church to the' south, and a vacant field (',rax Lot 1100) to the east. Vii. A 10 lot sti1ditiis on IS tinder consideration for the adjacent lot to the east of dolt Side instates, (Talc Lot 1100, 'Ottotii property) . A preliminary OUbdivieion proposal for the adjacent lot was submitted by the applidantt ' showing the eX'(`ension, of kable Street as a through street from the east line of Golf Sid` E;.sates to the intersection of SW g . . : :,� ��.., , . 8•t1•i and Lake Side Dive to make a 4 way intersection there • P STAFF REPORT FINAL ACTION TIGARD PLANNING DEPARTMENT ''... , February 20, 1980 Page 3 7. The nearest available sewer to the site is located in SW Lake Side Drive. This line is presently under the control of the Tualatin Development ' corporation, until such time as it is accepted by the city for city operation and maintenance. A ten (101 foot sewer easement has been :.4 granted to the applicant by the owner of the adjacent lot to the east (Lot 1100) . The easement follows the south line of Lot 1100 to SW 98th Avenue 8. Water service is available to the site from Tigard Water District lines on SW 100th or SW Sattler, 9. Traffic movement to and from the site will be served by SW 100th, SW Kable, .. g and SW Sattler. NPO 46 Planedes��.. nates Sattler as a collector street (36' 44' Streets.pavement} and 100th and Kahle as local •reets. SW 100th and SW Sattler are county streets, presently in substandard condition, without adequate paving Width, right-of•-way, curbs, or gutters SW 100th does not presently extend south of SW Kahle Street. As part of its approval of the Summerfield Planned Development, the Tiand Planning lanning Commission approved a forty (40') foot pavement along T.att SW the north side of Summerfield No. 7. The Tigard. ; MunicipaSattler e17.28 040 requires a minimum fortyfour (44i) foot pavement for collectorS. t ` 10. A leant ro ores to dedicatefeet of w .. pp p p r ten (l0' right,, along SW Sattler StreF and 25 x 73.91 of right ofway along SW ±00th at the southwest corner Of the site, as required in the zone changefor this site. (ZL 12-79) 11. Sewer, water, and drainage plans, and lot-,line utility easements were not indicated on the r liminary plat. Off site draina ,. ce from the southeasttittle Bull Mountain collects 1 ,, in the southwest orner of the site, Via open drainage ditches oh 8W 100th. ' �. p- and 144 The ...,hare tretora dr„,inntotthe ssite is onnthe fwestsSide ofSW100th, about \(,,:'. nearer s m a 100 feet south of 8W I able Street. 7,3 A strhooi impact statement from, the Tigard School District Janna: 23 Y , w j r 1980 stated that i'tio negative impact le anticipated" from the proposed subdivision. 14. Lots 1 and 2 Oh the preliminary plat are only 6,920 square feet each not (10') d �.. a . �o. street) 4 cl.udin the Coda ect�.oh 1:3 k 20.Oa re wiresn 5W Sattler in .. , g 'xi and Zofing Code 50 foot scree ed�ca on Oft 7,500 square foot g lots in R.-7 Zonae. U •. c, '''%#.4. t rr STAFF REPORT FINAL ACTION , TIGARD PLANNING DEPARTMENT // February 20, 1980 Page 4 15. The street cross sections proposed on the preliminary plat do not comply [; `' with city standards. a ' E' • TL. CONCLUSIONARY FINDINGS: 1. The proposed ,preliminary plat conforms to NPO #6 Plan, in that the lotting pattern is for single family residential purposes. The gross residential density `of 3.86 units/acre conforms to the R-7 Zone requirements, but . Lot 3 to the south. of these lots` is ,': Lots 1 and 2 are substandard. . 1 ; '. - nearly double the 7,500 foot minimum size, '`so an adjustment to the south lot lines of Lots I and 2 could bring them into conformance with the , R-7 lot size requirement. 2. Both sewer and water service are available to the site to facilitate An adequate sewer 'easement from the site to SW 98th � Development Pp . has been obtained bythe applicant.icant. However, since Tualatin Corporation presentlycontrols the sewer on Lake Side Drive, the applicant mts obtain permission from the Tualatin Development Corporation to tie U #. into that sewer or wait until that sewer is accepted by the city for city J, operation and maintenance. , 1 3. Adequate right-of-way has been indicated for SW Sattler, SW 100th, and SW Kelpie Street on the preliminary plat. 4. The proposed extension of SW Kable Street through the site and the adjoining lot to the east (Lot 1100) would be desirable to provide better access for r better traffic property�' o ert owners Golf Side Estates and circulation for the surrounding area. The Tualatin Fire. District _ caner • circul, i � `�.. (Joe Grtielich) concurs in this judgement. g portione, due to i 5. Surface drainage is poor on the southwest of the sit° ''• the topography oPography of the site and d the runoff ff from uphill properties. j Drainage will heed special attention on this site. The The applidaht Should . 11 provide for improvement of drainage throughout the site and downstream F , thereof. 6. Applicant should revise the street cross section plans after consulting With the Public Worn Department and before subiilitting grading and ' improvement plaits for street improvements ado °t the Co rehensive Plan (1iPo) street standards 7� � shvtlld P P , The rdinance,cso that .the previously approved ' ave neat by y off: f rty (40 ) foOt Permitted � Width on Sattler Street at Stimmerfield 47 can be ermitted on the north i , ,.• side of Golf Side Estates, Without i flhecessary vat ande proeedings li r�� (,„ STAFF REPORT FINAL ACTION TIGARD PLANNING DEPARTMENT February 20, 1980 Page 5 III. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat subject to ,, following conditions: 1. That the lot size on Lots 'I and 2 be adjusted on the final plat to allow for a minimum of 7,500 square feet per lot. Pk 2. Public water service and sanitary service shall be installed to this site prior to the issuance of a tuilding Permit including the existing house on Lot 6. ° 3. Thatapplicant obtain P � uaDevelopment Corporation to tie into sewLakedeDrxveorwaatuntilthat sewer is accepted ted .. by the city for city operation and maintenance 4. applicant t corvey a one . (1') foot street :pluq reserve strip at the east end of SW Kable Street to the City of Tigard. 5. storm drainage plans for the site and downstream thereof shall be submitted and approved by the Public Works Director, and install storm drainage system to the site prior to issuance of a building Permit. ! "'' 8. Gradingplans and constructionplans on all publicright-of-way's shall be r submitted and approved by the Public Works Director prior to commencement of work. 7. Nochanges made y approvedplansspecifications unless formal app licat onwis�madetothe appropriate City department, and changes are approved by that department. Application for changes will be male in writing and shall include applicable drawings. 8. Fire hydrants be`placed as per Tigard Water District and Tualatin Fire District regulations. 9. All existing or proposed utilities shall be placed undergrou d, including ` g P p uti int. J : the e ist:t.ng house on Lot 6. Street lighting installations shall be approved by the Public Works Director. • ��'.... pPermits .. ,. , ..d have been sat p tions placed upon 10. No r C�ccu ano p�btstheaG�.tb�ofsTycar�.tntx�. all coridlisf�.ed and aMns ections this.a d.'ve�,. pme y y 9 verifying this have been carried out by the appropriate departs lent. • ..:, _,.,...>..,, ,..; ..r.-+•-........ w,.amu, ,�� `r A • • • STAFF REPORT FINAL ACTION . ' ) • TZGA.�t17 PLANNING, DEPARTMENT � , ' February 20, 1980 �( Page 6 , . " 11. That ten (10') feet of right-of-way along SW Sattler be dedicated to the countyalong g the frontage of the site with Washington County approval. . to improve SW Sattler to collector street standards prior to issuance of • building permits. 12. That twentyfive (25') feet of right-of-way along the southwest side of • the property on SW 100th be dedicated to the county (the area is approx- imately 74 feet in length) . Half street improvements are, to be made along SW 100th from the intersection with SW Sattler south to the intersection of SW Kable Street. Full street imP rovement:s are to be made along SW 100th from SW Kable Street intersection south to the end of the subject site property line. 13. That street improvements be constructed to the approval of the Public H. Works Director prior to the recording of the final plat or issuance of a Building Permit. • Action of the Planning Director is final unless notification of appeal to the Planning Commission is filed with 'the City Recorder within twenty (20) ,days of the Planning Director's Action. Prepared by Richard Ross, Approved by Aid" -sward, Intern Planner P1-d Director vmc ,•.i � Cit ,.. This acknowledgement must be signed and returned to the M yTigard, . . of. Planning Department. Failure to return this acknowledgement will result in this project with regards to issuance of Building engineeringa roval. Permits or tPP Signature Date a • • • 'IRNA „ r .i, ,r ,,:, ;. .,.r» Y„. v 1 • f giassw� r�es �a�w� , ' • 1 BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF TIGARD WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON u IN THE MATTER OF THE ) ZC No. 12-82 REZONE & PRELIMINARY ) S No 4-82 SUBDIVISION APPLICATION ) Address: 15280 S.W. 100th .. FOR SUNNYSIDE ESTATES ) Legal.:T 2S, R1W, Sec. 11 CA, Gulfside Estates '� S., The Robert Randall Co .. 9500 S.W. Barbur Boulevard; Suite 300 Portland, Oregon 97219 Applicant-Owner-Appellant ., '• APPELLANT'"S ARGUEMENT BASED UPON TRANSCRIPT OF PUBLIC HEARING ; Appeal from the decision of the Tigard Planning . Iss.., ) of September. 7, 1982 ',:ki:f>.'''' John T. Gibbon, Counsel for Appellant PP • The Robert Randall. Co. t�4� ' 9500 S.W. Barbur Boulevard, Suite 300 .. A\- �7 Portland, Oregon 97219 Y :.,4;.) A �, '�• (503) 245-1.131 1 .. • The appellant hereby requests the City Council ) uponon reg' eev of the record and the arguements beforit) remand the zone change and • subdivision applications to the Planning Commission with the following conditions: 1. R-5 zoning maybeapproved for the site provided no more than �' 60% of the lots May be less than 7,500 square feet. ,{ ,.. 2. approvedmfor themsteore heii 21 single family lots may be A of no The appellant bases its request on the following findings of . . . facts and statements in the transcript, (1) page ' Commissioner Owens at a e 21 states, ++1 think that Tim interested in Commissioner Edenls proposal of split density and I dontt know if We " Oeveniwant to discuss that tonight or canit. . but itis not a clear )' �ut ISSUe one way or the other: (2) p 20 whileyi(( yy this from ^ 11 1 persuaded Y, d Chairman Tepedino at page static;�, I m not that we r g ..om R-7 to R45.�r, docs state "(On) this Commission ' should change this fr we ,Should look .dor smooth transitory changes rather than, abrupt changes". r Commissioner 'Edin ata e 19 states; r"I � guess the qUeStl:on that x would like to ask and didn't get it said during the cross examination is has anybody looked at the possibility of perhaps ft-5 below kable f "rfl I . .. ' • and. R-7 above. Using Kable as the medium for helping draw this line between Summerfield on both sides and keeping the larger R-7 above it. . I'd be far more open to that." The applicant submits that these statements indicate a desire on the . part of the Planning Commission to create a compromise on the density issue, believessuggestedrepresent such a compromise. issue it the. conditions re�r , 1T ar• The Planning Commission's decision was based on the Staff's recommendation r, of denial based on the following findings ' 1 'The proposal violates policy 2 of the adopted NPO #6 plan." 2. "The proposal is not compatible with existing surrounding laud ', uses." The applicant believes it was error to rely on those findings for the , following reasons. policy having been adopted in 1975 and is Nobased oncurrenthousing statistics. , contradictory Policy2 states, "The maximum overall density of development will be four dwelling units or 12 persons per gross acre." Density requirements for the areas within the Urban Growth Boundary gper acre by LCDG ' • assince 1975. been established as 6 e. ` such Metro aMoreaimportantly, Tigard's current Draft Housing Elementes household size hadg ` leaf � from �:0 assumed in 1975' to 2.3 ... indicates � shrunkp galsuggested by a ratio of l conditioned as assumed,.,.currently. Therefore an approval persons per gross acre closer the applicant will result • to the 12 per acre suggested by the NPO policy than that allowed under the current R-7 plans • .fi (2) i Reliance on NPO #6's Policy 2 alone is not sufficient when Y + reviewing the application, it must in fact be balanced against compliance pditioned as suggested by the applicant � with other NPO policies, If cbn ' the proposal will comply with NPO policies 6, 7 . and 8, that will , ° :t �;h, emphasize single-family homes in the area, it will provide txansitional buffer between Summerfield's higher density areas and 1both the large lots : and the undeveloped tracts in the area, finally it Will reflect a concern •. for the natural topography's constraints and opportunit .+pes of the Site. Y t +. r t P r..., Compatibility a:ssue raised bythe staff and the NPO related • s proposal, . Tho �PP g � 5 25 lot. subdivision ro• Y Y . . to the a 1�.cant s original Cbm lete Rp condition suggested by the Applicant were imposed, compatibility If the Pp with the 3 diverse elements existing in the area can be accomplished: The three different densities with which this proposal must be compatible g. ares foot site i+ The 4)5Uc square flots adjoining the site in Summerfield , 2► The larger lots adjoining, a portion of the site r rll tA.' • ;Ads Mx 3. The numerous undeveloped tracts adjoining the site, which will eventually be developed at urban density . The applicant submits that by mixing the density across the site compatibility with this diversity of adjacent land uses can hest be achieved. zz I Testimony by opponents of the proposal centered on two issues: • 1, The value of the homes constructed in the area. g b 2. The concerns regarding roads and access to the' property. In regard to the first issue Commissioner Moen was, the applicant believes, right in his characterization of the value concern articulated • by the opponents as really a concern with density and compatibility (page 19) , the applicant believes that the conditioned approval will address these concerns. Moreover as Commissioner Speaker (page 16) and r z Commissioner OWens (page 18) indicated in their statements, value compatibility 0,000.00 homes proposed by the applicant pai,�.bil�.i.: between the mid 7 and the existing homes in the area obviously will exist. • (2) • The traffic and access issue raised by the opponent's is clearly the most valid of their concerns. On this issue the Planning Commission supported the applicant. Commissioner Moen at page 19 says, "And I thedon'it think we can refuse ,; loads are going to have to be squared away sooner orolate;icand shopefully in this case the to developan area because of a developer would be involved in doing some of that." Commissioner Speaker also discusses the issue at page 17 and concludes that the benefits which will come from the development include both improvement to 100th and Sattler as well as the beginning of the ' obvious link up needed for table between 98th and 100th. The applicant also notes that Sattler hasbeen planned as a minor collector in this area and that 100th will obviously over time become an important access route to new commercial facilities in West Tigard as well as the downtown area IV T. current 15 lot (19 Unit) 1 The application to change the 7 subdivision to a 21 lot i 5 and tta7 mixed subdivision is based on the + 1. following considerations and constraints.. lo nedesign of the current plat is necessary to utilize the sewer in Summerfield as suggested by the City staff, 2. In its revised proposal the applicant . .. all ' , p p has eliminated attached single family homes in conformance with the NPO s Polities, 3. The proposal has sought to maximize solar orientation for its lots. �. ',.• �.. n has) in response to the l��t�0 s s concerns� reduced p� the number�ofbhomes�using the flag lot driveways and rationalized • cdlr-.:,....,. ,. :. ......„ ,.. ,. ...:,.,...,,., .. . .. . .. ...+w.y,. ♦ .r».....•.•wi i. ,., ,.♦ .... �n,wyrfyr 5 , ^+ N 1 t 1,,yAl, f the locations of their entrance onto the adjoining streets. j wapprovali 5. . The appeal proposes a conditional which will produce G a neighborhood with all essential urban services that will still be compatible with areas near it which were developed F N, without those services. h The:,constraints affecting this application included accommodation .. of the existing improvements on the land, a street configuration f dictated by the City's needs and the limitations produced by size and shape of the parcel of land to be developed. 1 V J The applicant in its Notice of 'Appeal (pages 2-3) set forth the reasons that its proposal complies with the Statewide Goals it adopts by reference that statement into this agruement. 1 I. Attached as exhibit to this agreement is a letter from an organization with an interest in of this matter and outcome i ,, ; ' ' expertise in the issues raised, the1eMetro Home Builders which supports � ' the :appellants proposal: vl Por the reasons set forth above the appellant respecfully requests i; the City Council remand these matters to the Planning Commission withr1} ' , the conditions explained herein. f , i T ' i , . , , 1. ,, T s ' • • .11 HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN;PORTLAND 155$8 S.VII. RANGY I OAD3, SUITE 301 ' LAKE OSWFQO, OREGON 97034 50',.V684.1880 THE METRO HOUSING CENTER November 10 1982 City Council • City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Appeal of ?C12-82, $'4-82, Gulf Side Estates Dear Mayor and Council Members : The Home Builders Association of Metropolitan Portland supports the Robert Randall company's request on appeal for a remand to the Planning Commission to consider a , new plat meeting the conditions proposed by the Randall Co The blend of R-5 and R-7 lots suggested by the Randall Co, complies with the comprehensive plan low density designation -htime solving several p roblems that this site suffers frothThe proposed redesign es the character retention of the single the NPO plan polity encouraging the Single- family y aracter of the area. It provides for a ;gradual, '� - rather than an abrupt transition from the large lots on one side to the smaller R-4 lots on the other side of the subdivision. The new proposal will also result in a more efficient road and sewer system, Most importantly, the redesign will create the opportunity for the construction of housing more within the abilities of potential buyers to pay Dcs" . pite the three-year recession in the general economy, home prices have on the average • ,•'' held stable or decreased only slightly, Oir association 's economists anticipate that when the economy improves, home prices will once again climb steadily, It is important) therefore, to provide lower cost housing opport .nities to meet both short and long term needs • Smaller lots, in the R-5 range, will be mach More prevalent the• meet these needs, Theproposal for in f'u�,ure to p. Gulfside Estates presents an ideal opportunity to begin to meet that heed. S ncere y, n La Hand Staff Attorn y xL11, t l o • 1\ • NOTICE 0 7 PUBLIC HEARING r � .� ;L F r4i S I f t f t; rel' WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON Notice; is hereby given that the Tigard Planning Commission, at its meeting on Tuesday, September 7, 1982 at 7:30 P.M. ,in the. lecture room . S.W.f Fowler Junior High School, 10865 � Walnut Street, Tigard, Oregon, will � � ,1 • ,� consider the. following application: FILE NUMBER: ZC 12-82 and S 4-82 APPLICANT: The Robert Randall Co. OWNER: Same 9500-S.W. Barbur Suite 300 r`", ' Portland, Oregon 97219 REQUEST: A request by the Robert Randall Co. for a zone change from R-7 to R-5 Single Family Residential and for approval of a 25 lot subdivision on t 3.89 acres. • (Wash. Co. Tac Ma 25l.lICA tax lot 900 ,LA,II.t'1J.J.0Ni 15280 S.W. L001.11 Ave. j . ) e map on reverse side r' (Se � this matter will be Conducted in accordance i with the pnearing_ i The public ` on thi +.,.. `on. An sonshav�.n "Lriterest `- i s matter mayattend and Planning Commiss�. i , � per g ;,. • � �lof rocedu�.es of th ruleS � and be heard, or testabe submitted. i .mon may writing to be entered into the record of the initial hearing. • i �. t i t.. - must Should ya`u wish to p�. ,.. , i � City , to the Recorder a x�a�.� a w.�itten letter addressed of be received prior to the expiration of the fifteenth day after the decision the hearing. If notioe to appeal is not received within fifteen days, the action is Valid For further inforntatiori please contact the Plannding Depsrtment at 539-4171. TIGIUlb CITY HALL r 12155 S.W. Ash Avenue (Corner of Ash Avenue IIurihham Street) • 18755 SW ASH P.0,DCX 25897 TtGAHD,OI1E ON 97223 PH:589=4171 ..;,—:r., v,n • , t t: ,, Vis. SEE MAP 2S 1 Iii C'41 • .' !, \, ....t 0 20� • Cr b P420 k... ` pd , 't BEG � CR rto. 857` (4•D'WloEl TERP;i« CR No 857-0 -'._2,:. _,�-`i, � '*, IY 'Wl1* ,,- N 89 58'W 20C 3: { + y �u 146.55 i 3 3,3 ° . b 5 Q 5 CNgI,l� 1.. W 'h�'.,,,,J• R=Z + 50 RZU' E 800 700 400 3i ,:t: Oa0 63 Ac. in ,44 Ac, %?3 Ac, Z 389 AC, M « tz 1 to to r I > ,q « tri - m ti464 tin / 133.3 `• pM, w = 600 w ,/4 Ac, , AP ittitrri-iinTrraiiiinnila46.95 13'3 3` I. e,lde ° �' 500 z0 0 : -1 kb,, ID,,,4(eI .36AG �--. } .. .. .y 89°58' 200 50 ti « w 4r+ 9 ;.Ig N 89° a(s W }� 333.3 M/1� 5 x'a� in .370 Wl .1. i1 W € I I C0 U # , ee • Silted 2,3/ 4C \ a � :58C :°"! �\ [a - . }; rw. 1,1 ' ',c: , « :. t � } +7 ! 4 WWI ' n ,` E u \ Vi rte~,� ti^ ��++dd r • Mai ,� 0 4 • + k *4J(')°4,0 C • .. y,, p;.,.,.. K t �+ ., 3.3171.. . ,5.05 NAi,y -...it `nitfl7'� f 4,4)4m, 10 10 XGAINS {;, pC11 `r1r.',. ';; t r 000 », . x f1 a 1i. fr;e4e,... ' 11 i'c Z w'1 I"iJi yG} ,, „ �� i1 , . ,, t -t,"1 I ' ilib, ' sir1/4 rp1YoF TI1RD WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION • • , . 1 The final decision was filed. by: PLANNING COMMISSION n ZC 12- on September _7 , 1982 S 4 ' • Concerni g 82-. - --' ' • Case Number Date Robert Randall Company . . •. • 2 Name of Owner; The. Robert Randall Company. 3. Name of Applicant: R• ., ___ Address 9500 S.W. Barbur Blvd. S-- 300_. City Portland State Ore. 4. Location of Property: Address 15280 S .W. 100th Ave Legal Description 2S1 11CA lot .900 —r 5, Nature of Application: Zone Change from R-7 to R-5 Single Family Residential and for apProval of a_._25 lot subdivision • • F-1 Approval as requested 6. Action I Approval with conditions LK)i.j Denial i 7 Notice: *Notice was published in the newspaper & was mailed to: 11111 The applicant & Owners WARM Owners of record within the required distance 11-,i;-] The affected d Neighborhood Planning Organization Affected go rirnhehtal agencie$ 4If there are questions regarding the names of the persona or agencies who received notice, this inforthation is available at the Planning Department:-, 8. Fina. Decision. „. The adopted findings of .faoty decisions and statement of condition can be obtained fro' ... City of Tigard) City Hall, 12755 SW Prom tt� • 2�� Pla���.��dDiOr��o��g7223 Ash, Fx0� 80x 97t g. application for a varianceo the applicant In the case of a deClsion oh' an applxic , the City of Tigard) Planning �, ,•. �return it to iasued or engineering approval trust ��:�tnowl.edae this form and ermits w birecter before any building p giver!, Signature of Applicant or Applicant's Date • typ plibant�s A� e'nt •over • 1 •.. . ,, „ . . .. . .. . .. ,,, . . . . . .. ,T-.. ' ',' .... . .,, ... r . ,. , . , , , „ ,,,.yo. ,`_ .: ., . ,, ' .'r has not been f l.ed : ,... has been filed L x] . . ..... . 9. Appeal: An appeal r, ma a e , .. '' to the decision ' al. this decision in accordance ' y pp Note; Any party , _ .— appeal may with Section 7'8:84.250, which provides tha a'' writtent l' be filed within' fourteen days after notice 18 given and Ma Noti ee is gi Viten ori Se t. 21;, 1982 therefore the deadline •� UC:�obe�. 5 , l9 8? • appeal is , 4 ._� far 'riling of •an app. +, ' have anyoestions9: p f Tigird 10. • lease Ca11 the City o Questions: If you hq Planning. Department,, 639-4171 . e , . k d Ii Iy ci • a d i . r.'f::, t if' ', ay. t'....,, ,ylv.,. ' , . . , i'''.. . .,_ ' . • a ,. 2 ti ' , (-(3%Ici) ., \ ( (it,,, ' , i/e),,, , 1 „ ,fefrez---&-t-le-r---/ 3' ,/,./.2.--- ife.,... ' . ,:, :.N N , - . - - ,,,- ,.. . 1,. t7. 0 .. . 4. , i , .44 q . . : SSP 7 '� n2. eAICdt.d i. (Wittla z4 . 10025 S. W Highland Drive r C ne? Tigard► Oregon 97223 .^' 1NGLd • 2. .p6,-,t ' Lii ,,,,--)A,,,e , ziei, 4,00zile,e ' . 6.1_,/... , „ ';,. ,, , , ... 6t,. oy j er/l...6 - 4t 7--6,9, I ,)d •,-,1(' ' '''' ,-; , ,,„/, e,,,iti,, ,••"7/6/ ; t 44-.7e- , .. ‘,.. 0,,,L „„ti , , ,(7... c-6) .7,..si-4,4.4,1.}..” ,-,' di 10 ,,,„z. 7-7,-/„..,: s e :'',, . . , #\,,„_,..4„.,, ,_ _ • • 44,1,,, -‹;e2,,,-/-1 1 , /-9' - e--c ' - • 1,,, . . . . . ,/ 4,9 , -.._,e.,,,,..,‹ ,,,2-1--e) ; , ......, / ,,. r......., ePe.... ..." ,,,,, • .,/2.74-4-4e , , 249-74--e... (-44'4 a"11,-- , A,,,e,-..z e ,,,,.t i.:..‹.--/ , . ., . .G 1 , t { . 9, ,,,,L,„...,8„,,,„4„,„ i ",,,,,,ee . . 1, , ./..„ , h.-62-e, ci , , ite-4t.-4''A n e ,,,,(-)4_, ,„?,,,,„., , .. , „4-..,„ ,,,,,,-;,z-i, - e---„-4,;,,,,,4...'.'..e,,,,,- .r., , ,/, • .. •, d,,,,,.,-61.2.e.6.., , ,,,,, ,• , . , . 1, 4,....4,,,, e„,e0,,,2-. .- -,,,t9e() 2'9 • , e ,,e. ,I--e /-6, . „e.,,i- d,-(,,e)t---e2,4 e- -- xs i. l E , ..,,,,, / / a'et, 1.- e,,,e,ft-'—'4'4'A- ...,41'-' " 1 • . 1 .4 et ,,,z--c..4,- - .,eie,'61.-e- ' ,,,,,, -z a•pt..,,,‹ ee,, , ,, ' ,...4 .%,"....6,.,„4,,,,, 41_ ,,,,,e/644...,' ,,,..---ii,,,o-e.e.,„(..--e ..--'4.4.- - i ,, '('eli,-,/1.7e-0,..1.." ( / ' .' ,e 4,01./xtetc-,L126,e,,,e A, , j,.....-ei.,e z,A, , /0, . ,„,,,44,6,7 _.,„4.)-z-0.e.44.,er-e ,-- , ' , 4c . - r r� w C ' I ; --- 0 '2...'‘-' . . C -. --c),,,,,- I'D, . . ,.....) , AFFADAVIT OF MAILING i . t VM (, STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard I, Diane M. Jelderks, being first duly sworn, on oath despose • • and say: ' That I am a Secretary for the City of Tigard, Oregon , That I served notice of hearing of the''I',i.garrl Planning Commission of which the attached is a copy (Marked Exhibit A) upon each of the following nand persons On the c, day of' y • 1982, by nailing to each of then at the m dress shown the attached list (Marked Exhibit B) , sa .d notice as hereto attached, _. d-sposi -• in the United States Nail on the day of ,.. :i 1.1 A .A , 1982,. . ,� .....postage prepaid. 0 ., ,_.(ca4:///te_ / 11!/,‘, :///,‘ 1 Subscra�bed and sworn to before it�e on the /`'''_ 1"--'' day of. 4 (a • e , 19€ I. r •.. R4.' Kaki #i f I t'S Y '''ti t 1,*,:, # 4....... j`narr `�u7 fix. ` NOTARY i1µ' rid�+�C OF OREGON / q'1 iv M,fir�'"^' "'a c rtrti iSaiWS empires: 7 F+/ ' `1 i 1, 11 f : Y� 11 ' 4 1,16 • • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Tigard Planning Commission, at its meeting on Tuesday, Se tember 7, 1982 at 7:30 P.M.,in the lecture rood 4P of Fowler Junior H.ghSchool, 10865 S.W. Walnut Street, Tigard, Oregon, will consider the following application: FILE NUMBER: ZC 12-82 and S 4-82 APPLICANT: The Robert Randall Co. OWNER.! Same 9500 S.W. Barbur Suite 300 Portland, Oregon 97219 REQUEST: A request by the Robert Randall Co. for a zone change fromRR-7 to R-5 Pp �Single Family Residential and fora approval of a 25 lot subdivision on 3.89 acres. LOCATION: 15280 S.W. 100th Ave (Wash, Co. Tax Map 2S1 ,11CA tax lot 900) (See map on reverse side) The public hearing i . .. .. .. caring On this matter will be condnc tPd in accordance with the ales of procedures of the Planning Commission. Any personshaving interest in this matter may attend and be heard, or testimony may be submitted in writing to be entered into the record of the initial hearing: youpPetsy ,r must should wish to t� a�.� a written letter addressed to the� Cit.., Recorder '' receivedprior t� the e iration sof the fifteenth day after the decision Of : be � the hearing, If notice to appeal is not redeived within fifteen days, the action is valid. ror furtherinformawrnon please contact the Plannding Oe artment at 039-4171. TIOArib CITY 1Pt.t 2755 S.W. Ash Avenue (Corner of Ash Avenue Burnham Street) .nv. WA<rvr v 'I • Y x, r5 r l ll 1.OU ".'' BA1tLOW �,Lot 900 `f r, 15020 Sw. 100th 10000 s w i Mand a ,, Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 The Robert Randall Company 1512 16100 9500 S.W. Barbur Blvd. s-300 JONES BIGLIN Portland, Oregon 97219 9885 S.W. Sattler 10020 S.W. Highland Dr. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 1517 16200 .,, maker Associates Inc. , 11.080 S.W. Allen Blvd. ALLEN , AUSTIN Beaverton, 9955 S.W.S.W. Sattler Rd. 10040 S.W. HighlanDr. }• Or. 97005 Portland, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phillip A. Pastoris NPO # 6 2S1 11CC 15200 16300 8935 S.W. Pinebrook St. LEVY CHARTERS Tigard, Oregon 97223 10075 S.W. Highland Dr. 10060 S.W. Highland Dr. g g Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 251 11CA 400 1100 • 15300 16400 ' OTOOMAN, Patricia IRELAND ANO 15195 S.W. 98th Ave. 10080 S.W. Highland Dr. 10065 S.W. Highland Dr.. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 ' • 0 700 15400 281 11CB 1702 MOTTELSTEDT EISEN ULWELLING 9880 S.W. Sattler 10055 S.W. Highland Dr. 15165 S.W. 100th Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, ORegon 97223 800 00 1711 I+'EIGHERT BIERMAN HENDRICKS 10045 S.W. Highland Dr. v Dr. • 9900 S.W. Sattlerg 10125 S.W. Hoodv�.e Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Ore. 97223 100015600 1712 CORP. . F ISH ,�S100 Ci OF MCCLELLN ACARVER O URCHOF JESUS�CHRIST L 35 SW. HIGHLANDDr: 10155 S.W. HoodvieV 50E North Temple Re Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - , Salt Lake City Ut. 84101 :251 11BD 1502 15700 1713 , VIAL 4ADDY 15105 S.W. 98th 10025 S.W. Highland Dr. 10185 8.W,, Hoodviet Dr. Tigard, Oregon97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Ore.. 97223 1504 15800 1714 HUNT DEVELOPMENT CARSTENSEN ' MC QUIRE GO. 5975/� S.p . S r`l t.�i iHighland Dr. 11570 S.W. Walnut 7„11 1� t��,'�'Y S�� 100�J ►7 i W fi s Tiga ;d, Oregon 97223 Tigdrd, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Or. 97223 15051.�9Oo�" 1 715 ►TO881.11SON 000PE1t SCHUL ' 9845 S.G . Sa�Cler St. 10005 S.W. Highland 152858,W, 10O th Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregott 91223 T ga 'd, Ore ott 9`7223 c r,Ari u i,, .r, . )... ,t4 a 't:. , 1 i .. 4 .d 2S1 11GB 1716t x. HO SON 10040 S.[ Kable St. Tigard, Ore. 97223 1717 LOAR ) 10080 S.W. Kahle St 1' ` Tigard, Oregon 97223 J , u a e, �. v • a p a 1 • • • f • 1 it • r. i 't. • r d A,''',. r'31,:. j, SEE MAP 2S I HBD l . 92 • 2Cr Lt • �r TkR�;1. C,R' X10 657- .... ,,,,,,....,,,,,-0.,1..._-�._ ✓ C,.R r1 n57 137 W 4-JR ., T. o L. /•:. r , i ,l1t,_, 1..0. Y P. ! ... .. N N 2:.',',':e 313'71 $ $ i .r' 146.85 133 3 5 0 fi CH91il^� • �_ W Mil a " R:2• 508=20 ►�,+ woo 400 800 003( 900 to 44e. u, 1..�3 Ac, • 3 z 389 4 63 Ac. tti CO toin int2. tri o 11.1 +�+ N i7� ai N �r ,, K1 wtip / 133.3_ ' 0. 1• I do 85 M IICB ..°t 5Q0 z I , ri\ I D r,--..,,,. F, —1 0. rm • y 11 ., nt. iVsS°68,1 50 ri ?_pd `_ N.89 58 W 10 333,3 M/L ,�� 370 1 u, I.•. ▪? x z kr a, i�+nJ cy 4 1100 t 1 to, q eFi ., pr+t 1 :7 c,... 2,3/ 7C, 1 y 1.1 --Cet,h)ee-L'*" 4' din cn:PO o 'STR5ET 0 ti^+ + o C , .ryr .... ray , '� 1 ' a++ ,a ` VS 1 K,b J 064mob=- , 113. 1• `w TScaw}""" eti „ E,' tlHQ# Ca x� F � Y7 ttio Ed"' ,\ , I* Y ry' 1.S'. , W 11 41 :� ,.�r I CJ00 h• I I y.,C� :�My 1 �r�"d c: �. r4 i 1 1 • n' -.;,,e1,..'f ,s C''' `11 koF MI /!!,r'"" gyp/^�11�1�/� Y+� �Yr M 0 Si{ . cs - WASilNGTON COUNTY,OREGON r ... . , .. CASE No ,. GENERAL APPLICA'T'ION FOR 1, �. ' CITY OP TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397 RECEIPT No. `,,cr_ 0 .1.;e10 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503)639-4171 G � 1. I �'OR STAFF USE ONLY: :°. GENERAL INFORMATION ,Associated Cases: ; PROPERTY ADDRESS_ 15280 S.W.' 100th Avenue. Tigard, Oregon 97223 w: LEGAL DESCRIPTION T.2S, RIW, Section IICA T.L. -......_...,t INTERNAL PROCESSING: Accepted or Pre-App.: SITE SIZE 3.89 Acres - * The Robert Randall Company By. °1 PROPERTY OWNER/'DEED kIOT�DER PHONE 245--1 x.31 . ADDRESS 95 0 S.W. Barbur Blvd. Suite 300` ......_.-----•-=-- Pre-�. p. ZIP 97219 Portland, Oregon �..` CITYDate °& ` . APPLICANT'S' Same 1 , b ,.' ADDRESS PHONE � _..- Accepted, for nec;isiorr. CITY • ZIP By , 1 owner and the applicant differentpeople , .cant are the '�'/ M ` *Where the PP �a pp u p record or a leasee in Hear, ng D.: e ` ," lic� 7ant mi" poSsession withbwritten authorization from the owner or an � pit of the ownerauthorization. The written Heari g Reset To ri »4 ,' �*'x. �Y ,with written atzthorh�.s aPplicatiion. _ .;h actLhoxization must be submitted with t Decisionfiled & mailed 2. REQUIRED LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION IS ATTACHED 1:1)_,f‘ES,..1:1 NO_, ,,.,1.. r 44 ''THIS APPLICATION INVOLVES THE FALLOWING: APP. Accepted for Appeal: FEE FILED PAID -- Comprehensive Plan Amendment -- - By; ., from to quasi-judicial -_._..._.,..� a : legislativelegislativeDete of Hearing; x Zone Change from R-7 to R``5 --- quasi-judicial �~ DESCRIPTION: IPTION DESC 7.egislativE Comp;. Plan Uesignatiott: { , Planned Unit Development • . concept ipt plan detailed plan• _ NPO No. It Subdivision $I25 Major PartitionZoning Aistrct • Minot Partition Design Review --. .� -- Conditional Use Zoning Map No: Variance to Zoning Ordinance carter Section , ,; -� Qtoo. �`Tit],e 18) , Variance to SUbdivision Ord. L_ _ _ _4 .�:.� STAVE 1VoT�:S Sensiti�ie Land Perrin F l ooc p la in s Itainageways Steep S ope • W... - 0 t11e r • - $425 • M . L a:r, • }(i 7 ry rk ,. • CSN :t. L APPLICATION FORIvi : 1'1 'L 2 CASE No. CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397 , Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 .., SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED BY APPLICANT), rFOR STAFF USE ONLY r • Notice of Response A. . . .Sees nt .r . _esL .. 4 . DISTRICTS Yes S Tigard School District ---... SCHOOL DISTRICTg �' Tigard Water District 23J -� WATER DISTRICT ,,. � FIRE DISTRICTTuP Tigard Fire DepartmentIIIIIIII __ PARK DISTRICT • Tigard Park District , UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY - Sewer Available: YES III N0-1::r--- 1M ' `` OTHER •. 5. PUBLIC UTILITIES ELECTRICITY Portland General Electric ............. Northwest Natural Gas NATURAL GAS: _._ w . TELEPHONE, General Telephone OTHER 6, PUBLIC TRANSIT (TRI MET) _. NEAREST BUS ROUTE AND STOP Route _p4511t.p,aS.W.t 98th Avenue _ w 7. 0 © INTERESTED AGENCIES (SPECIFY) ..,,. ... .. ,.,.... ........, .,.. ,..... .wiywr++••r+sr'r."iww'+.Iwa�'r"'/ir.+rA '. 8. CHARAGTER OF THE AREA 1 . ,.. EXISTING LAND USE .PLAN DSIG AVON ZONA VERT,PYED3STAFF.. . . , . G',', Single Family Low Density Residential Washington � NORTH CountyRU-1} Residential R-�7/5 LoW ' Densly Residential i Church R--7/ SOUTH 5 R-7 Loi' Density R,e sidentxa Washington A EAST Vacant and Single 7 5 Ocsunt.. RU-4 Family Residential ' Single Family Lbw Density ttesiden.tia1 R-7 48ST �1 R'"7/• �.esi�lential Wash. Cty� Rtt��� , t a • i �, , GENERA APPLICATION FOR1� ...:. ,AGE 3 X >. CASE No CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397 g g _ Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 9. CHANGES IN THE CHARACTER OF THE AREA WHICH AFFECT THIS APPLICATION. Please Discuss: This property is surrounded on three (3) sides with land that was recently annexed to the City of Tigard. The existing zoning of that land is Washington County RU-4 arid the City of Tigard's plan designation is urban low density with a density range or R-7 to R-5. The character of the area to the north and northwest of the site is in large lots with older homes. Land to the east is vacant and developable. The Church of Latter Day Saints is adjacent to the south property line. Sumerfield No. 4 iS located to the southwest of the property and contains lots which are less than 5,000 square feet. The proposal is compatible with the comprehensive plan. Since the property surrounding the site has recently been annexed to the City of Tigard, the vacant parcels' can develop at the • amerde sit naffs P Pp with smaller lots in the same dens t s thisro osalAlso SummerFa.eld has .evelo ed _ 10. DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE Lot Area (acressquare Feet) The site contains 3.89 acres. _ , ,._ 11. EXISTING STRUCTURES ON THE SITE ' Square . Distance_From Property'Line Use ,_ Feet North South East West Single Family Residential 2145 235' 325' 165'. __ 51_ . NATURAL CONDITIONS 12. Percent S lope 5I__Average 13, Vegetation Types: Average Diameter Percent Of Each Yes No Size Of Trees Per Site Trees: nc ' Brush'' x Grass: xM x Hoyt `much of the site iq {n floodplain? a i t . Floodp�,aitls. p k l5+ Wr�ker Courses x What type? , 1? Rood 01tcrop Plrs r { . 1 18» Proposed development: Please briefly deseribe thee �.o osed develop nient.: x"he,proposed, ' development is a 25 lot -.. 5 00t). s L feet, minimum lot Size residential,,eti d .v s-idij.:. �. . .ry The onsite iMprbvementS .inclu. the ,extension of ,8 W� ,ttable:.Street..fro. 10ath Avetti g�W „ to the East property line, Lots Will adpebs 'rom, 5 4 4y k ble 8 { i , r N Awa. Clt, .;�° CASE No. G APPLICATION FOP._� �kGE 4 CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397 • Tigard, g (503)639-4171 Oregon 97223 -- The following is ,, is required.is notx � ' 20. Overall Site Dee 1.opn nc:. Res dential Commercial Industrial, Open Space Other Roads Z'otal. No. of acres h , or square . 3.3 Acres E0.5, Acre 3.8Acrds feet per usp( Percent of �.. sited 100/ 14/ 86/ 21. 'T p cif Rest dentialUse and Characteristics of Bedrooms/Unit Type of:Use # ofUnits EFF. 1 2 .3 4 Proposed Deti 'si.t , x Uni t iLkax1 r Sing Family Residential 25 6. n 22. Where applicable, please explain how the open space , common areas and recreational • facilities will be maintained: . Since this is a typical residential subdivision the ripen space is the yards of the ' individual lots and Will be maintained by the respective property owners. Q 23p If the project is to be compplease describe each. . phase of the Project.let�ed in phaSes, 10 Phasing Anticipated, { `j r � sta�� w�;l.l �.dent�.iry fat yo0 whethe'� ttii,s secti+bY� is to he couptotod r ' 1 v ., 1 r , . ... ,. *IiwM.r.1yw. .Y. uI•,♦ r a,«.AwT.y ... . •.,.,,. r - "i�rn • � -. a`♦ r e'. 0 1, •.- - 1 .+.,. +.•.+n ......� .....iM.o ............... w,.•�n,n.h :;P..-w+..r-»u.�rr ....,.... .. .n x... .........�..._,.......ia-,Y,.i.. —........,..nv. ... -...w..... ..i..., , r....tr ,.�.-..-.......« ...,�.... ._, � .r• a. «.. ,.., �u a.., , ,,,,.. t �a GENERAL APPLICATION FOnf�... - h ,SAG; 5 Y:, CASE No. CITY'.OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397 , Tigard, Oregon. 97223 -. (503)639-4171 H4 THE ,FOLLOWING PEOPLE, AS REQUESTED BY THIS APPLICANT; 'SHALL BE NOTIFIED OF EACH HEARING. (e g.; Attorney, Surveyor, Engineer) Sta,Ef ' ' Notice Notice Repor Decision of Review • Name The Robert Randall Company ''.•:,'- ' Str9500 S.W. Barbur Blvd Suite 300 eet Portland ' Cxt� State OregonZip 9721.9 - �� . Name Waker Associates, Inc. Street 11080 S.W. Allen. Blvd.,Suite 100 . '1 City Beaverton State Ore Zip 97005 . .. • Name Stree t . State Z` City , Name S tree t City State Zip . APPLICANT • �'' , , ertc ` P ;A // OWNER. . _..1 )44"1),"/ii. . . tiAY- otAltdreJ (......0-1 .. . ,, , , , ‘ ' , , , . • . % ____ , . .r, ,.' a i t 1 a 4 e. Y4 ). ..+,,,,, 60. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON • RESOLUTION NO. 82-_ IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF A FINAL ORDER UPON COUNCIL REVIEW OF ITEMS S-4-82 AND ZC 12-82, AS PETITIONED BY THE ROBERT RANDALL 60' COMPANY, APPLICANT. THIS MATTER came before the Council at its meeting of November 15, • 1982 , upon the filing of a Notice of Review under TMC Sections 18 .84.240 and 18 .84.260. The Council had before it the entire record of theproceedings before the Tigard Planning Commision, which denied the request with one dissenting vote, on September 5, 1982. The applicant, The Robert Randall Company, has sought review of that decision by filing a timely Notice of Review on October 5, 1982.. The applicable criteria to this decision are the following: State-wide Planning Goals 1 , 2 6; 7 , 9 10` 11, 12, 13 and 14 . ---NPO Plan Policies 2 through 6 , and the Plan Map. --TMC Section 17 . 06 .065. Based on the record in this case, the Council makes the following FINDINGS OF FACT; 1 . The subject site is located within the corporate limits �. of Tigard, Oregon at 15280 S. W. loath Avenue, and is alSo identified as Washington County Tax Map Parcel 2S1 11CA Tax Lot Y . 900 , comprising 3.89 acres, more or less. 2. The subject site is designatedurbanLow Density on the NPO 6 Comprehensive Plan, which is applicable to this case. The �.i i.._.. i Y _.. - residential , 0 site �.s zoned R-7 (single famil�'d to be rezoned u "a �sa.ngl. 7 , 500 sq. e famil .. minimum �.ot sa.ze) and is :propose �` residential y 5,000 sq. ft. minimum lot Size)' to' accommodate t Y i Y - proposed subdivision. 3 The surrounding area has been developed primarily as single family residential , although the Church of the tatter Day Saints lies directly to the south and the property to the east • is vacant. ` ., i i Y g, house i i garage i Y ich 4 There into on the site wh . ... is an existing hand could be integrated into the. new subdivision. The site is grass �g � are a dew tteeg on t1j covered and slopes to the south. There northern portion of the site. 5. The subject site is within the acknowledged Metropolitan Service District Urban Orowth Bowidar'y and is both too small RESOLUT/ON NO. 82 ... , Page . t-.i - ,r .✓t; 'I 4 A ;.1 , . M: rill 1N r ,....B • , a , ,. a r, -- ,Y.r•e > v.1'w it.r,'• Yk:! • I, sy> +h. .. :M'..I.•x 1.W...ai,. p�lt.\,•M ..,.... .(4a�v A'b4.', .JI' ., and surrounded by development to allow for farm or forest uses. 6 . There are no resources as listed in State-wide Planning Goal 5 on the subject site. 7. There is standing water on the site, causing drainage ' difficulties (Transcript, pp. 6 and 17) . Otherwise, there are no natural hazards on the site. 8 . The area has sufficient recreational facilities, according to the Tigard Parks Plan. 9 . The staff report, Section B(1) (d) notes that no storm drain plan was submitted with the application, that fire hydrants were not located and there was no response regarding the capacity of the schools. The Council determines that the applice.nt failed PPlanning to show compliance lance with State-wide Goal 11, notwith- standing the proposed attempts (Transcript at p. 15) co show that proposed drainage facilities were adequate. No drainage plan was submitted with the application and the verbal indication of compliance is insufficient. See also, Staff Report, February 20 , ' 1980 , Finding 12. 10 . The city has undertaken a revision of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and will bring the draft revised plan, including consolidation and revisions of the existing NPO 6 Comprehensive Plan before the Council in December, 1982 for its review. • The Council also makes the following CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: 1. The Council concludes that the main issue in this case conformityis happlication with Tigard i�g d Comprehensive planirithis case NPO 6Thea application could allow up to 25 units on the site, while the R-7 designation would allow as little as 15. The PD District is not applicable to this site • to increase density, aShe site is less than four acres is size. 2. The application does not conform to the Tigard Compre- hensive .., " Plan Maps of NPO 60 applicable to this site. In order to approve this application, therewould have to be a � . Comprehensive Plan revision. 3 The Council notes that Planningthe. Commission . i i cons�.dered, the possibility of revision of the SPO 6 Comprehensive Plan for this site when all compre ..hensive plans are reviewed by that body and the Council. The Council concludes that this process is a pp p s' , more appropriate riate mean of dealing with the issue of "split density" on the site rather than app sulications ch as this or small-tradt comprehensive plan revisions, because the policy issues of housing need and density are more appropriiately addressed at that level, McIntyre-Cooper. do. v ..Bdof. Cotim i rs ,of Washy n•tori noun , 55 or. ,app, 78 , 637P.2d 201 (1981) . RESOLUTION NO 82- page 2 ti jh.m,,.... : ...., a„;. :. ,.... .,, :... .: ..._.. .,.,„,, .,:; ..r�r '4i” vd.e.,a3a....ry,,. �...•Me1Y, '!Y 0 4. The Council need not reach the issues of compliance with other applicable State-wide Planning Goals , neighborhood compatibility, nor the adequacy of facilities and services, with the exception of drainage facilities. On this point, the staff report found, and the Council believes, that there was insufficient evidence to show compliance with State-wide stated. Finding of Fact No. 9. The PlanningGoal i s, as . in Council rejects the staff conclusion at p. 3, third paragraph, which is a conclusion not based on the evidence in the record. . 5. The applicant states that Policy2 of �ersons0 Pergross": limiting density to four dwelling units or 12 P. a residential acres, should be construed as to allow an increase in density in the area. The applicant does this by suggesting different demographics by way of household size, MSD and LCD C rules, and the Draft Tigard Housing Plan. • The Metropolitan Service District and LCDC housing rules are directed to the plan adoption and revision process, not to individual zone changesoiand subdivision requests. McIntyre-Cooper v. Bd. of Comm`rs. , supra; F `] v. City of Happy Valley, 55 Or. App. 905, 640 P.2d 656:(1982) . Nor is the city bound to accept more recent, but con- , g i i adopted tion v i ubuilderslAssocia its Metropolitan f 7.�.ctin , evidence of houSehold comprehensive plan. Hozrie com rehe Service District, 54 Or. A pp. 26 , 633 P.2d 1306 (1981) ; Valley & Siletz Railroad v. Laudahl , 56 Or. App. 487 , 642 P.2d 337 (1982)• Nor is the city obligated to Use itS Draft Plan over p planalreadyadopted. �--r -; reversed on its comprehensive 2d 144 1970 ,n v Ha ar , other Or.. App. 310, 317 318,5 P.2d ( ..r�..____. 23542, pP- Or. 693 (1975) ;, r,s v. Bd. of: County Comm'rs t . R grounds, . LUBA7 217, 221 (1980) ; Ti f f an v Malheur ..CAunt , 5 Or, De ers ' Y Y � city of Portland, 2 Or LUBA 397 LUBA 5 7 6 2 (19 8 2) ; Atwood v y . ..�.. (198:1) cityinterprets NPO 0 PlanPolicy 2 to emphasize the ,.. . The four dwelling units per grass residentialreference acres. The r ross acre i5 illustrative and Burp inter- to 12 persons p t�sa especiallyin viewofthe remainder of that policy. As inter- i , i preted, the council concludes that the applications do not meet i, this policy. 7. Because of the noncoiilplianee with the NPO 6 Plan, the applications also fail to meet State-wide Planning Goal 2 and TMC section i7.x:6 .100 (b) (3) ORDERS that, �. The � " � , therefore, the above-reference+ Council applications bei and the same hereby are, btN1k,D ry gLSOLDTION NO. 82- Page 8 .r Y nY /1 ' -..,�,.hw,.....'-..:.::a»»».,.��..�m.,a....—......:.:...::... .�....._.,,_.-.:....c...» :.:....:...�.._:_::,1'a.,, it.., :.. - :: ,h :.e:�:. ...._:�..«....,..!.�.....:w....., •_:,....;. ».-.Yw;:._....._K.:.;-...�, »..•. _.... :_.A:,d. .. r.' 4..h a�;? n 1ryrY:. • ,r..,.... 1 ,151Y l�. .y�. . , a.I. The Council FURTHER ORDERS that the Planning Director and the City Recorder send a copy of the Final Order as a Notice of Final Decision to the parties in this case, , PASSED: This day of ,Y 1982, by the Council of the City of Tigard. V 1 � Mayor y City of Tigard • ATTEST: City Recorder - City of Tigard • • Yr • • r , i� syu; 11.880LUTION No. 8 Page • • I��`�IV�Yi, ............ ........ ��,., r,.�,...,�,,J�, .. . ....` r`�.._..,�«._..n .. 4 w �u.wYr r..,aw..... • �- 7.,f r .. '��:�Y �., .u.. ' Y r ... •.. ..,.11 �b f"M_AYaMY RY9MVF X4Y u�p ...'. .��1._ �'il,� r ' ,' , . r titt hy, Uf'r � T 'is A , . , fogoilllipolif\,, i' • .. •:.4-14,- f',,ir A. '1'.:,,' ,, . , . ' ., . . CITY TI I'', ..,,., WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON l' . . . • , John T. Gibbon .` Secretary Counsel ... The Robert Mandell Co. Kristin square ° 9500 S.W. Barbur Blvd. Suite 300 Portland, Oregon 97219 Dear john, I . g the Cit: will hold yuu request 1 �• A.s we discussed an the phone this marnin ,. �' for an ext ension of the Public Improvement Bonds on the Gulfside S ion. '-. The tatter will be brought before City Council after the resolution of yo;xr appeal on the' Planning Commdssioris denial of Sunnyside Estates p improvementside Estates a fire on Novembe The public a bonds on Gulf l9 82. We will make e�eryattempt to resolve the extension issue by' that date. Sincerely, • , , ,. , . ' •/ it4tt-tvi a ., ' Elizabeth A. Newton Assaeiate Planner Nirh , w P.O.00X SS97 TIGAi b C?Ft pl�lr G��-417`1 . � w 275 S,VV;ASH �OiV�72�5 . • —•1' I� • , , i • • • 1. • • 2S1 11C13 171E HOPSON • 10040 S.W. Kable St Tigard', Ore• 97223 •1717 LOAR • 10080 S.W. Kable St. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Eufli • • 4 • • •r • • • • • • • � is • r • • ' r • • Yi i I - ; r i', 4 4 • , •y SEE MAP 25 I II B • cr, ` o, t` `',',4• �I L, ` ''°•,,, ,, 7.,71:Le.:,0. -....�..�.... �-��_ w_.� •CtRt•.i C R No 35 N ct GR ;� 857_,____________—.--_...-- wra l W ," ,• 4 S C1 '` / ., r:.at3 5a "� z�c s t/�r c '33 3 r I`r "i! r • ii ii i$tti' titV :r,' 146,95 5..5 CNti N5' !. .� R:20 r 90 n'20 • 'NW 700 400 E,, •;r 800 /_3 c ,ACU ° a4 ac 389 c a.. 44 rn ' c, • ' � � . W ri' r -' co t. 14. �„aw LTJ ' DWI r 600 w M« /4 c, - 1Q� t i3 a r1 r h�1 Ido�5 .4., 0 ``' 'trir�� s., +.JVD✓. 0 . bisa A. ,,.. 36 4c f"_, rt ) F d blid �� a ):.,0 ' p . A �.:/a,or .,...., :.-- p, PA 1 r I H Not -IIPII ,^ ✓ rw � t CV 5�.,, 100 rya.{, .,`.;1,,..;..r 4., 5�r ,"r 1, KM u-)-1-----------4-66—NS g 1 V '''',-,V 3 5 3 C/L 9 =,,,, z r -iJ t� Q_ i• ,� bas 1100 ` ,�,: 6461 �� E y 114 wu ,2,31 14 c. 1 d' Iri tt1 if d • pa► ""' '4'"' 4I J N. 2378 C:? x ,,,.. w,, , ,,,„.. I �� h i , ,... , .... .,,,,,„ ., .,, .....,:, .t, .,-s.-,•. c.,«, fit' r'4. t. �7 0 C Ora ' , 40 +"' W II�.�y 1 W' y 1335.it: Yi x c 104 y 47`R111''W' .—.,»w i�� �.,.,•..��..--.-,r:: " i 1+,,�riiY.-,,,,,,,,,,,t�i 4144-,1444.1-441 - iliti RC1 �+.H, 4 #;�1 }O � } i I ry } 0411.' 44 4:4: j ,.. 1 I�.,w1Mr ,...• r . p J ri, Lr4 +. ,tom �,y kff �'. k .r. Ixv r Ir{ , r w + .