Loading...
Report (16) 71/1 -r20 1`7- - 0014 3 `9- 15151 1 Sw ThQwes '- - 'i' T)aidjog R722y GEODES[GN FIELD REPORT Page 1 of 2 GDI Project: Polygon-129-03 Prepared By: Daniel Stai Project Name: River Terrace East Date: 1/16/19 Location: SW Scholls Ferry&Roy Rogers, Bvrtn. Report#: 274 Arrival: 1 130 Departure: 1230 ---- --------- ------- Weather: Cloudy, 40's Permit#: TBD Site Visit Requested By: Angela(Polygon) Met With (on site): ._....._....___-- Purpose: Observation of Lot 126 Retaining Wall Embedment Outstanding Issues: FR252B(7/10)-Vertical cut at base of retaining walls on lot 119 and-1226*PARTIALLY RESOLVED FR274* Lot 126 Retaining Wall Embedment I observed that contractor appeared to have backfilled against the toe of the retaining wall on the western edge of lot 126 that had previously been observed to have insufficient embedment. Backfill consisted of% inch minus and there appeared to be at least 6 inches of crushed rock covering the bottom layer of Lock+ Load blocks. I used a Yz inch diameter steel'T" probe to observe relative density of the crushed rock, which was dense based upon resistance to penetration. Soil had been placed adjacent to the wall on a slope on the north side of the retaining wall. I removed some of the soil to reveal gravel embedment to generally be at least 6 inches and dense. Conclusion Based on observations, it is our opinion that embedment for retaining wall on lot 126 has been prepared in general accordance with our geotechnical recommendations. Distribution: Attachments: Photo (1), Site Plan (1) Reviewed by: ` ' J/ / -` This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services We rely on the; +$3. n to comply with the plans and spedflcatlons throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Out work does not hid . .at •x,+ of direction• i.,the contractor's employees or agents.Our firm is not responsible for site safety.This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,,. r, and prelimi gay rec. t ,:,�.E report can only be considered final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as indicated by initials in the"Reviewed By'section. Signature: eV „-.-' e0 Alit 0- :'ir 9450 SW Commerce Circle,Suite 300 I Wilsonville,OR 97070 1503.968.8787 I www.geodesigninc.com �l. I 11-1 1I UE,TV 1I ru,m'0o I t1 I I Ila 'PUE,TOP. /, I I 66 'a+ //�—,.,IArrocc FACCAIT GEODESIGN,INC Polygon-128-03 01 /16/19 FR274 DMS152 REVISIONS — N� —1----1_ _� o —T DATE DESCRIPTION 1 -I} �` t .'' , 1 �� J 138 I 6.00' ] ——— ri I „/ PUE,TYP. ( PUE,TYP. 4 I g 1 151 ^ 1 '�- 139 140 141 142 N 1' '':'71 II 6.00' �� �\ 137 ;I' - PUE,TYP. h { 3.0D' 6.00' \``T �_ y i' 136 PUE,TVP. PUE,TYP. 1 11+ - ———12+00' (_;, " SW LUKE LA _ L LI—— i t 135 i R $gyp..a.:.: -��_ ] , . ,,,,7„,...,„,,,,,, 8 146 145 :[PU1: i134g. D `T 4Y a'iN a y •{, _ i 5 PAVEMENT SAWCUT,TYP. �5��1IROZO,44 Zi , 133 4. q .a°, 5 I 3 i �iii�iiii�voa�ivi� � ''' 64450PE �� 1 m arI 1 11+00 L26 _ — 12+00 - L_ _� u fa ,:{ :.TRACT 1-- I— I STREET —I % .f OREO s F — I TRACT J "IC iii�7c7 - - . 9 Id)4I?' - I 1 iiiiAWANiiiii .viiriiiiwi%.4,ii�w 149 i4' I .- 132 8 — -- ---- ---� Qyn 6.00 C SOH*ARI W K + ' 600 ^'T ° EXPIRES:JUNE 30,2016 1,� 131 y{ '.00' I i �„ TY°126 125 124 123 I V Pe 130 1600 I �, 148 River Terrace `.. I h PUE,TYP.1 {tJ '' w � East 129 8— j Construction Documents o+ i i.. 128 147 119 120 121 122 i ( I PUE TYP If PUE,TYP PUE OTYP. — ii)) 11-./f/v- _ r�r.,„,.. iii4 iiiiiii .1.4,7,--iiiiii ilii ' TRACT F SITE C. / \ -18+00 : 19+00 �J 20+00 8 6.00' 00 ?� o + L'1 1 — -1—.7—I 4 I PUE•TYP. PLAN _INE NORTH LEGEND HEET4.2 I ————PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY PROJECT NO.: 395-041 PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER TYPE: CONSTRUCTION t .........................................�. EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER REVIEWED BY: KCS/PRE —PROPOSED CENTERLINE N 1ST SUBMITTAL DATE 5/2/2016 Lot 126 Lock + Load EXISTING CENTERLINE 41, -PROPOSED PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT 6" granular Embedment PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING BOUNDARY LINE © PROPOSED HANDICAP RAMP (i) - I f PROPOSED A.C.PAVING I EXISTING A.C.PAVING 4 • 1 ( `:' •`•- I PROPOSED SIDEWALK SCALE 60 0 30 60 ' I//////I PROPOSED SIDEWALK BY OTHERS m immis I I EXISTING SIDEWALK 1 INCH=60 FEET