Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Greenworks ~ C190032
CITY OF TIGARD-CONTRACT SUMMARY FORM Contract Overview Contract/Amendment Number: C190032 Contract Start Date: 12/19/2018 Contract End Date: 9/30/2021 Contract Title: Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Contractor Name: Greenworks Contract Manager: Zachary Morris Department: Public Works Contract Costs Original Contract Amount: 148,224.00 Total All Previous Amendments: $44,177. Total of this Amendment: 0 Total Contract Amount: $192,401.00 Procurement Authority Contract Type: Personal Services Procurement Type: Formal RFP >$150K Solicitation Number: LCRB Date: Account String: Fund-Division-Account Work Order–Activity Type Amount FY FY FY FY FY Contracts & Purchasing Approval Purchasing Signature: ' Atm— Comments: Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT STUDY BONITA ROAD TO TUALATIN RIVER C190032 AMENDMENT #4 The Agreement between the City of Tigard,a municipal corporation of the State of Oregon,hereinafter called City, and GreenWorks,P.C.,hereinafter referred to as Contractor, entered into Agreement #C190032 on the 19th day of December 2018,is hereby amended as follows: 1. Effective Date and Duration This agreement shall become effective upon the date of execution and shall expire, unless otherwise terminated or extended, upon completion of the work or December z020, June 30,2024-, September 30,2021 whichever comes first. All work under this Agreement shall be completed prior to the expiration of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized undersigned officer and Contractor has executed this Amendment upon signature and date listed below. CITY OF TIGARD GREENWORKs,P.C. Signature Signature Steve Rymer Printed Name Printed Name 06/29/2021 Date Date City of Tigard CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER 13125 SW Hall Blvd. � Tigard, Oregon 97223 AMENDMENT SUMMARY Phone- (503) 639-4171 ' FIELD CHANGE ORDER FORM Fax- (503) 684-7297 www.tigard-or.gov Project Title: Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study: Project Manager: Zach Morris Bonita Rd to Tualatin River Contractor: GreenWorks, P.C. Original Contract#: C190032 Effective Dates: 01/01/2021 —06/30/2021 Chane Order/Amendment Amount: $44,177.00 Accounting String: 460-8000-56005-95057-130 Amendment Percentage Running Total: 29.8% AMENDMENT DETAILS NMM"W-- Increasing contract value associated with completion of originally scoped work along with added scope, and extending contract completion date to 6/30/21 to allow for completion of the work. CHANGE ORDER DETAILS UNIT QTY UNIT$ TOTAL$ Original Contract $148,224.00 Amendment 1 —change in date only 0.00 Amendment 2—change in date only 0.00 Amendment 3— scope increase and change in date $44,177.00 TOTAL $192,401.00 REASONING FOR CHANGE ORDER/AMENDMEN111 1 11T Implications of COVID-19 and an elongated project schedule, including assisting the City in the creation of a robust on-line virtual open house in lieu of a traditional in-person style oen house, did not leave adequate budget to complete the conceptual design and cost estimate tasks of the original contract. In addition, the level of analysis now deemed warranted in the vicinity of the arterial roadway crossings is substantial. In order to complete this project a contract amendment for additional scope and a schedule extension are needed. BUDGET IMPACT AND REQUIRED ACTIO There is a required budget increase. The contract amendment is contingent upon council passing the increase in the Q2 Supplemental or slowing down or reducing sco e of CIP 92057 Fanno Creek Trail Amenities project. REQUESTING PROJECT MANAGER APPROVING CITY STAFF Signature Signature 1/6/21 ate Date Contractor is hereby authorized by the City of Tigard to perform CONTRACTOR the additional work described below in accordance with the terms and conditions detailed in the original contract along with all applicable rules,regulations,and laws that may be in effect for the work. The unit pricing in the original contract shall apply to all Signature additional work. A copy of this form, once completed, is to be forwarded to the Purchasing Office to ensure all changes to the encumbrances are met. Remember— the cumulative total of Amendments cannot exceed theproject's FY budget. Date CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT FANNo CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT STUDY BONITA ROAD To TUALATIN RIVER C190032 AMENDMENT #3 The Agreement between the City of Tigard,a municipal corporation of the State of Oregon,hereinafter called City,and GreenWorks,P.C.,hereinafter referred to as Contractor,entered into on the 19th day of December 2418,is hereby amended as follows: 1. Consultant's Scope of Services The scope of services is amended to perform professional consulting services relevant to the Project as provided in Exhibit 1-A, which is attached hereto and by this reference made a part of this Amendment. 2. Effective Date and Duration This agreement shall become effective upon the date of execution and shall expire, unless otherwise terminated or extended,upon completion of the work or 1)ee tuber 1 t i a .,�I. _�'--'I whichever comes first. All work under this Agreement shall be completed prior to the expiration of this Agreement. 3. Consultant's Fee A. Basic Fee As compensation for the professional consulting senTices as described in Exhibit 1-A of dus Amendment,the Consultant will be paid based upon the Schedule of Rates in Exhibit 2-A of this Amendment. The Basic Fee shall be adjusted by Forty-Four Thousand One Hundred Seventy- Seven and No/100 Dollars{$44,177.00} for a total not to exceed amount of One Hundred Ninety- Two Thousand Four Hundred One No/100 Dollars ($192,401.00). IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized undersigned officer and Contractor has executed this Amendment upon signature and date listed below. CITY OF TIGARD GREENWORKS,P.C. r� /% 4W�y Signa e Signature tMIEL01 &A& Printed Name Printed Name {, SVZO Date Date EXHIBIT 1-A Task 1: Conceptual Design Tasks 1.1: Original Scope/Budget Increase: The original contract included completing a conceptual design and associated cost estimate. Implications of COVlD-19 and an elongated project schedule,including assisting the City in creation of a robust on-line virtual open house in lieu of a traditional in-person style open house,did not leave adequate budget to complete the conceptual design and cost estimate tasks,which were the final tasks of the original scoped work. This subtask is to create budget to complete the originally scoped tasks as follows: a: 10%Design of Preferred Trail Alignment. Prepare a Preferred Trail Alignment to a 10%level based on feedback from the Client,Stakeholders, and Community.The 10%package will include the location of die preferred trail in plan at a legible scale.We will include plan enlargements at the street crossings at Bonita and Durham Road. The plans will highlight areas of wetland and vegetated corridor impacts, boardwalks,and bridges and creek crossings. b. Cost Estimate of Preferred Trail Alignment: Prepare Cost Estimate based on the preferred trail alignment_ Task 1.2—Bonita Road SegKnent Stud : %'hile the original contract contemplated a conceptual design and associated cost estimate, the level of complexity along thejrail alignment in the north segment adjacent to die Bonita Villa apartments and the Portland Compressor property exceeded that originally anticipated This subtask is to further evaluate the trail alignment options in this portion of the study area in order to determine a preferred alignment in this area. a: Site Layout: Refine design base of the trail layout on either side of Fanno Creek along top of bank to inform additional structural,hydraulic,and parking lot implications listed below. b. Structural Anal=sis_Further evaluate structural needs for trail along the top of bank to a conceptual level for costing and feasibility. c. fA•draulic An 1 sis: Run Flec-Ras model for trail alignment along west and east side of Fanno Creek and provide mitigation volumes for impacts. d. Cosring: Prepare concept level cost estimate for refined trail alignment options on east and west side of creek. e.Parking Studies: Prepare a diagram and cost estimates for potential parking lot modifications to the Bonita Villa apartments and Portland Compressor property to accommodate parking impacts for a new trail. f. Comparison Analysis: Prepare.matrix comparing east and west side alignment options based on design criteria to assist with a preferred alignment Task 1.3—Durham Road Bride Study: NX10e the original contract contemplated a conceptual design and associated cost estimate,it did not contemplate the level of analysis that is now deemed to be warranted associated with a trail alignment going underneath the Durham Road bridge that crosses Fanno Creek. This subtask is to further evaluate the trail alignment in this portion of the study area in order to determine a preferred alignment in this area. a: Site La#out: Refine design base of the trail under the Durham Road bridge to inform additional structural and hydraulic implications listed below. b. Structural Analysis: Further evaluate structural needs for trail below the Durham Road bridge to a conceptual level for costing and feasibility. c. Hydraulic Analysis: Prepare Hec-Ras model for trail alignment below the Durham Road bridge and provide mitigation volumes for impacts. d. Flood FrequencK Evaluate USGS data to determine flood frequency at an elevation that provides 8' min.vertical clearance for the trail below the Durham Road bridge. e. C_ o� Prepare concept level cost estimate for refined trail alignment of trail segment below the Durham Road bridge. Task 1.4 Flood Elevation Mapping: HDR prepared flood inundation mapping included 1.1 yr,2 yr, 5 yr,and 10yr flood elevations. The mapping aided in locating the trail alignment options within the creek corridor to ensure the best possible route would have the least amount of flood frequently and impacts to the floodway. Task 2: Technical Report The original contract contemplated the consultant team helping to prepare various documentation that could support future grant applications,however,an actual report that clearly documents the study progression and final results was not scoped. This new task is to prepare a report clearly documenting the results of the study effort. Task 2.1—Draft Report:Prepare Draft Report for the Alignment Study,including narrative and formatted graphics describing the background,process, community and stakeholder engagement, analysis,alternatives, and preferred alignment. Task 2.2—Final Report: Based on feedback from the City, the team will update the report Task 3: Project Management and Coordination Task 3.1—Design Team Meetings: 2 virtual design team meetings during process outlined above. Task 3.3—Client Meetingg 2 virtual client meetings during process outlined above. Task 3.3—Project Management and Coordination: Additional time for coordinating project deliverables with team, answering emails, telephone calls,and monthly invoicing. 3 i 4 � S _ a x y P A 11,11 Ti N _ Q @@ q Pit' 2 � � i¢ 'c E City of Tigard CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER 13125 SW Hall Blvd. _ AMENDMENT SUMMARY Tigard,Oregon 97223 Phone- (503) 639-4171 • s FIELD CHANGE ORDER FORM Fax- (503) 684-7297 www.tigard-or.gov Project Title: Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study: Project Manager: Tegan Enloe Bonita Rd to Tualatin River Contractor: Greenworks Original Contract#: C190032 Effective Dates: 06/30/2020— 12/31/2020 Chane Order/Amendment Amount: i ccoun String Amendment Percentage]Running Total: % AMENDMENT DETAILS Extending contract to December 31, 2020 as contract was put on hold first 6 months of issuance L CHANGE ORDER DETAILS UNIT QTY UNIT$ TOTAL$ REASONING FOR CHANGE ORDER/AMENDMENT BUDGET IMPACT AND REQUIRED ACTIONS REQUESTING PROJECT MANAGER APPROVING TY STAFF ii Signature i nature 6/12/2020 Date Date Contractor is hereby authorized by the City of Tigard to perform CONTRACTOR the additional work described below in accordance with the terms and conditions detailed in the original contract along with all applicable rules,regulations,and laws that may be in effect for the work. The unit pricing in the original contract shall apply to all Signature additional work. A copy of this form, once completed, is to be forwarded to the Purchasing Office to ensure all changes to the encumbrances are met. Remember— the cumulative total of Amendments cannot exceed theproject's FY budget. Date CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT STUDY BONITA ROAD TO TUALATIN RIVER 0190032 AMENDMENT #2 The Agreement between the City of Tigard,a municipal corporation of the State of Oregon,hereinafter Galled City,and GreenWorks,P.C.,hereinafter referred to as Contractor,entered into on the 19th day of December, 2018,is hereby amended as follows: 1. Effective Date and Duration This agreement shall become effective upon the date of execution and shall expire,unless otherwise terminated or extended,upon completion of the work or 1 tide 40, zT[)�r�aril��1�-71.21011,whichever comes first. All work under this Agreement shall be completed prior to the expiration of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized undersigned officer and Contractor has executed this Amendment upon signature and date listed below. CITY OF TIGAR JD GREENWORKS,P.C. . Afr J$40, Signature Signature Martha Wine �. ���j G f �w�7 •k. Printed Name Printed Name 6/12/2020 y r+.+&, I I ozw- Date Date City of Tigard _ CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER/ 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard,Oregon 97223 AMENDMENT SUMMARY Phone-(503) 639-4171 FIELD CHANGE ORDER FORM Fax- (503) 684-7297 Lor.go Project Title: Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study: Project Manager: Tegan Enloe Bonita Rd to Tualatin River Contractor: Greenworks O ' inal Contract#: C190032 Effective Dates: 1/23/2019—06/30/2020 1 Chane Order/Amendment Amount: Accounting String: I Amendment Percentage Running Total: % AMENDMENT DETAILS Extending contract to June 30, 2020 as contract was put on hold first 6 months of issuance CHANGE ORDER DETAILS UNIT QTY UNIT$ TOTAL$ REASONING FOR CHANGE ORDER/AMENDMENT BUDGET IMPACT AND REQUIRED ACTIONS REQUESTING PROJECT MANAGER APPROVING CITY STAFF Signature Signature 6 20 Date Date Contractor is hereby authorized by the City of Tigard to perform CONTRACTOR the additional work described below in accordance with the terms and conditions detailed in the original contract along with all applicable rules,regulations,and laws that may be in effect for the Signature work. The unit pricing in the original contract shall apply to all additional work. A copy of this form, once completed, is to be forwarded to the Purchasing Office to ensure all changes to the encumbrances are met. Remember — the cumulative total of Amendments cannot exceed, the project's FY budget. Date �-J C— CITY-OF TIGARD,OREGON AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT STUDY BONITA ROAD TO TUALATIN RIFER C190032 AMENDMENT #1 17ac ;1;g reemcnt between the Citi*of Tigard,a municipal corporation of the State of Oregon,hereinafter called 0t , and Greviff?rks, 1 .C.,hereinafter referred to as Contractor.,entered into on the 19th day of December, 2018, is hereby amended as follows: 1. Effective Date and Duration This :igrccjuent shall become effective upon the date of execution and shall expire, unless otherwise wrminated of extended,upon cc�tnpletion of the work or Weeem ber �'' -3049 1 mic ;11. r,whichever comes first. :111 work under this Agreement shall be completed prior to the expiration of this .1gq.eemcnt. IN WITNESS NESS WHF REO1~, City has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly- authorized undersle,ned officer and Contractor.has executed this Amendment upon.signature and date listed below. CITY OF TIG RD GREENWORKS,P.C. Signature Signature Printed Name Printed Name Date Date CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT STUDY BONITA ROAD TO TUALATIN RIVER C190032 AMENDMENT #1 'I'he Agreement between the City of Tigard,a municipal corporation of the State of Oregon,hereinafter called Cit1�,and GreenWorks,P.C.,hereinafter referred to as Contractor,entered into on the 19th day of December, 2018, is hereby amended as follows: 1. Effective Date and Duration flus a€;rceinvnt. shall become effective upon the date of execution and shall expire, unless otherwiseterminated or extended,upora completion of the work or r'.,...,.,_'_„_4112049 1 whicherer comes first. _-11.1 work under this Agreement shall be completed prior to the expiration of this Agreement. 1N Wll-l\Tl`,SS WHEREOF, City has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized undersigned officer and Contractor.has executed this Amendment upon signature and date listed below. CITY OF r" GREENWORKS,P.C. '7 Si ,gnature Signature of Printed Nanic Printed Name Date Date. CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON-CONTRACT SUMMARY FORM (THisFORMMusTAccow NYEYERYCONTRACT) �C106-3� Contract Title: Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study: Bonita Rd to Tualatin River- Number:.-.., "'`(J(�J Contractor GreenWorks Contract Total: $148,225 Contiact Oven-lew The contract will complete an alignment study to determine the best solution and most feasible route to connect the Fanno Creek Trail between its existing terminus at Bonita Rd and the Tualatin RiN-ex. Initial Risk Level: ❑ Extreme ❑ High ❑ Moderate ❑ Low Risk Reduction Steps: Risk Comments: Risk Signature Contract.Manager- Tegan Enloe Ext: 2442 Department: PW-Engineering Type: ❑ Personal SN-c ® Professional Svc ❑ Architectural Agt ❑ Public Imp ❑ General Svc ❑ Engineering Svc ❑ Other: Start Date: 12/20/18_End Date 12/31/19 Quotes/Bids/Proposal FIRM Amoum/ScogE GreenWorks 1st Parametrix 2nd Alta.Planning&Design 3rd Shapiro Didway 4th Account Stang: Fund-Division-Account Work Order—Activity I=e Amount FY 18f 19 460-8000-56005 95057-130 $100,000 FY 19/20 460-8000-56005 9505?-130 $48,225 FY FY FY AWrovals - LCRB Date: Department Conunents: Department Signature. Purchasing Comments: Purchasing Signature: t Cid Manager Comments: ` Cit4 Manager Signature: After securing all required approvals, forward original copy to the Contracting and purchasing Office along with a completed Contract Checklist. Version Date: October 10, 2018 City ofTigard FINANCE AND INFORMATION SERVICES QUALIFICATION BASED REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (QBS) FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT STUDY BONITA RD TO TUALATIN RIVER Proposals Due: Thursday, November 8, 2018 - 2:00 pm local time Proposer must include one (1) original and one (1) electronic co1y on a portable USB drive Submit Proposals To: City of Tigard—Contracts &Purchasing Office Attn: Joe Barrett, Principal Management Analyst 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Project Manager: Tegan Enloe, Senior Project Engineer Phone: (503) 718-2442 Email: teganektigard-or.gov City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 1 (503) 639-4171 1 www.tigard-or.gov PUBLIC NOTICE QUALIFICATION BASED REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT STUDY BONITA RD TO TUALATIN The City of Tigard is seeking sealed proposals from firms qualified to provide professional services to assist with the Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study: Bonita Rd to Tualatin River. Proposals will be received until 2:00 pm local time, Thursday, November 8, 2018, at Tigard City Hall's Utility Billing Counter at 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, Oregon 97223. Proposals will be scored and ranked on a qualification basis and the City will enter into negotiations with the top ranking firm. No proposal will be considered unless fully completed in a manner provided in the RFP packet. Facsimile and electronic (email) proposals will not be accepted nor will any proposal be accepted after the stated due date and time. Any proposal received after the closing time will be returned to the submitting firm unopened after a contract has been awarded for the required services. RFP packets may be downloaded from www.tigard-or.gov or obtained in person at Tigard City Hall's Utility Billing Counter located at 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, Oregon 97223. Proposers are required to certify non-discrimination in employment practices and identify resident status as defined in ORS 279A.120. Pre-qualification of proposers is not required. All proposers are required to comply with the provisions of Oregon Revised Statutes and Local Contract Review Board (LCRB) Policy. The City may reject any proposal not in compliance with all prescribed public bidding procedures and requirements and may reject for good cause any or all proposals upon a finding of the City if it is in the public interest to do so. The City intends to award this project pending City Council authorization of funds and receipt of Metro grant funds. PUBLISHED: Daily Journal of Commerce DATE: Monday, October 15, 2018 QBS—Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita to Tualatin 2 1 Page Close—November 8, 2018—2:00 pm TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE TitlePage-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 Public Notice 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of Contents 3 SECTIONS Section 1 Introduction 4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Section 2 Proposer's Special Instructions--------------------------------------------------------------------------4 Section 3 Background---------------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ------- 7 Section 4 Scope and Schedule of Work____________________________________________________________________________9 Section 5 Proposal Content and Format-------------------------------------------------------------------------10 Section 6 Proposal Evaluation Procedures________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________________11 Section 7 Proposal Certifications-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------13 Section 8 Signature Page-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------14 ATTACHMENTS Attachment A Acknowledgement of Addenda-----------------------------------------------------------------------15 Attachment B Statement of Proposal-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------16 Attachment C City of Tigard Engineering Services Agreement---------------------------------------------17 QBS—Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita to Tualatin 3 1 Page Close—November 8, 2018—2:00 pm SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION The City of Tigard is seeking sealed proposals from firms qualified to provide professional services to assist with the Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study: Bonita Rd to Tualatin River. Proposals will be received until 2:00 pm local time, Thursday, November 8, 2018, at Tigard City Hall's Utility Billing Counter at 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, Oregon 97223. Proposals will be scored and ranked on a qualification basis and the City will enter into negotiations with the top ranking firm. No proposal will be considered unless fully completed in a manner provided in the RFP packet. Facsimile and electronic (email) proposals will not be accepted nor will any proposal be accepted after the stated due date and time. Any proposal received after the closing time will be returned to the submitting firm unopened after a contract has been awarded for the required services. Proposers are required to certify non-discrimination in employment practices and identify resident status as defined in ORS 279A.120. Pre-qualification of proposers is not required. All proposers are required to comply with the provisions of Oregon Revised Statutes and Local Contract Review Board (LCRB) Policy. The City may reject any proposal not in compliance with all prescribed public bidding procedures and requirements and may reject for good cause any or all proposals upon a finding of the City if it is in the public interest to do so. SECTION 2 PROPOSER'S SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS A. PROPOSED TIMELINES Monday, October 15,2018 Release of Project Packet Thursday, November 8,2018—2:00 pm Deadline for Submission of Proposals November 19-30,2018 Negotiations Tuesday,December 18,2018 Award of Contract by LCRB Monday,January 7, 2019 Commencement of Services NOTE: The City reserves the right to modify this schedule at the City's discretion B. GENERAL By submitting a proposal, the Proposer certifies that the Proposal has been arrived at independently and has been submitted without any collusion designed to limit competition. C. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL The Proposal and all amendments must be signed and submitted no later than 2:00 p.m., Thursday, November 8,2018, to the address below. Each proposal must be submitted in a sealed envelope and designated with proposal title. Proposer must include one (1) original and one (1) electronic copy on a portable USB (thumb) drive of their submittal. To assure that your proposal receives priority treatment,please mark as follows. OBS—Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study: Bonita Rd to Tualatin River City of Tigard—Utility Billing Counter Attn: Joe Barrett, Sr. Management Analyst 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 QBS—Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita to Tualatin 4 1 Page Close—November 8, 2018—2:00 pm Proposer shall put their name and address on the outside of the envelope. It is the Proposer's responsibility to ensure that proposals are received prior to the stated closing time. The City shall not be responsible for the proper identification and handling of any proposals submitted incorrectly. Late proposals, late modification, or late withdrawals shall not be considered accepted after the stated bid opening date and time and shall be returned unopened. Facsimile and electronic (email) proposals will not be accepted. D. PROTEST OF SCOPE OF WORK OR TERMS A Proposer who believes any details in the scope of work or terms detailed in the proposal packet and sample contract are unnecessarily restrictive or limit competition may submit a protest in writing, to the Purchasing Office. A protest may be submitted via facsimile. Any such protest shall include the reasons for the protest and shall detail any proposed changes to the scope of work or terms. The Purchasing Office shall respond to any protest and,if necessary, shall issue any appropriate revisions, substitutions, or clarification via addenda to all interested Proposers. To be considered, protests must be received at least five (5) days before the proposal closing date. The City shall not consider any protest against award due to the content of proposal scope of work or contract terms submitted after the established protest deadline. All protests should be directed to the attention of Joe Barrett, Sr. Management Analyst, and be marked as follows: RFP Specification/Term Protest City of Tigard—Contracts and Purchasing Office Attn: Joe Barrett, Sr. Management Analyst 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 If a protest is received in accordance with the section above,the proposal opening date may be extended if necessary to allow consideration of the protest and issuance of any necessary addenda to the proposal documents. E. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION AND SIGNING All requested forms and attachments(Signature Page,Acknowledgment Addenda,Statement of Proposal, etc.) must be submitted with the Proposal and in the required format. The submission and signing of a proposal shall indicate the intention of the firm to adhere to the provisions described in this RFP. F. COST OF PREPARING A PROPOSAL The RFP does not commit the City to paying any costs incurred by Proposer in the submission or presentation of a proposal or in making the necessary studies for the preparation thereof. G. INTERPRETATIONS AND ADDENDA All questions regarding this project proposal shall be directed to Joe Barrett, Sr.Management Analyst. If necessary, interpretations or clarifications in response to such questions will be made by issuance of an "Addendum" to all prospective Proposers within a reasonable time prior to proposal closing, but in no case less than 72 hours before the proposal closing. If an addendum is necessary after that time, the City, at its discretion, can extend the closing date. Any Addendum issued, as a result of any change in the RFP, must be acknowledged by submitting the "Acknowledgment of Addenda"with proposal. Only questions answered by formal written addenda will be binding. Oral and other interpretations or clarifications will be without legal effect. QBS—Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita to Tualatin 5 1 Page Close—November 8, 2018—2:00 pm H. BUSINESS LICENSE/FEDERAL TAX ID REQUIRED The City of Tigard Business License is required. Chapter 5.4 of the Tigard Municipal Code states any business doing business in the City of Tigard shall pay a City of Tigard Business License. Successful Contract will be required to present a copy of their City of Tigard Business License at the time of contract execution. Successful Contractor shall also complete a W-9 form for the City at the time of contract execution. I. CITY'S PROTECT MANAGER The City's Project Manager for this work will be Tegan Enloe, Senior Project Engineer, who can be reached by phone at (503) 718-2442 or by email at tegane9tigard-or.gov. J. PROPOSAL VALIDITY PERIOD Each proposal shall be irrevocable for a period of ninety (90) days from the Proposal Opening Date. K. FORM OF CONTRACT A copy of the City's standard engineering services agreement, which the City expects the successful firm or individual to execute,is included as "Attachment C". The contract will incorporate the terms and conditions from this RFP document and the successful proposer's response documents. Firms taking exception to any of the contract terms shall submit a protest or request for change in accordance with Section 2.D "Protest of Scope of Work or Terms" or their exceptions will be deemed immaterial and waived. L. TERM OF CONTRACT It is anticipated that the contract will commence on or around January 7, 2019. All work stemming from the contract will need to be completed no later than December 31,2019. M. TERMINATION The contract may be terminated by mutual consent of both parties or by the City at its discretion with a 30 days' written notice. If the agreement is so terminated, Contractor shall be paid in accordance with the terms of the agreement. N. NON-COLLUSION Proposer certifies that this proposal had been arrived at independently and has been submitted without collusion designed to limit independent bidding or competition. O. PUBLIC RECORD All bid material submitted by bidder shall become the property of the City and is public record unless otherwise specified. A bid that contains any information that is considered trade secret under ORS 192.501(2) should be segregated and clearly identified as such. This information will be kept confidential and shall not be disclosed except in accordance with the Oregon Public Records Law, ORS 192. The above restrictions may not include any subsequent cost or price information, which must be open to the public. QBS—Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita to Tualatin 6 1 Page Close—November 8, 2018—2:00 pm SECTION 3 BACKGROUND The City of Tigard is seeking a consultant team to assist with development of a preferred alignment of the Fanno Creek Trail between SW Bonita Road and existing trail terminus at the Tualatin River. The Fanno Creek Trail is the main north-south walking and cycling route in this part of the Metro area, and is the parallel walking and cycling route to Interstate 5 and OR217. It is a Regional Trail in Metro's Regional Transportation Plan Regional Pedestrian and Bicycle Networks. However, its effectiveness as a transportation facility is significantly reduced by the many gaps and substandard areas of the trail in Tigard. This project will select the alignment and complete preliminary design/cost estimates of the final missing link. This will position the City to seek finds for final design and construction to connect all portions of the existing Fanno Creek Regional Trail and provide a safe,comfortable,enjoyable,and reasonably direct travel experience for community members who see walking or cycling as a viable transportation option in this area. The figure below identifies a conceptual path for the alignment covered in this study. Vit'_ ., '�. a•"~ �• Aey . The preliminary alignment will need to account for a future final design to be designed and constructed in accordance with regional, state and national standards, be considerate of its surroundings, facilitate users' enjoyment of nature, and provide an excellent walking and cycling experience. The project will include elevated crossings of Fanno Creek, drainage ways, wetlands, natural areas, and salmonid habitat. The City plans to lead the public involvement efforts,with support from the consultant as necessary. QBS—Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita to Tualatin 7 1 Page Close—November 8, 2018—2:00 pm A. In order for the project to be considered successful,the final alignment must be/have: 1. Constructible; 2. Reasonable cost; 3. Minimal natural resource impacts while providing aesthetics; 4. Good user experience; 5. Able to be permitted; 6. Maximum use of existing public lands; 7. Available ROW for the route; 8. Best meets future funding source requirements; 9. Considers underserved communities; and 10. Alignment and cost estimate completed in time to apply for additional funding by June 2019 B. This project will to be complex. Potential challenges that will need to be considered/addressed include: 1. Coordination with ODOT Rail - possible alignment options could involve crossing the WES tracks, which would require an ODOT rail order. 2. Coordination with CWS — possible alignment options could involve a route at the Durham waste water treatment plant and potential bridge and/or boardwalk structures crossing the interceptor easement. 3. Project schedule and impacts to future grant funding 4. Impacts to wetlands,vegetated corridors, and creek resources 5. Flood zone impacts to possible alignments 6. Cost of difficult alignment construction,including possibility of multiple bridges and boardwalks 7. Adjacent property owner interests and impacts 8. Potential constructability and space constraints near Bonita, under Durham Road, at Durham waste water treatment plan, etc. C. Suggested key deliverables and timelines include: 1. Data Collection: This task focuses on collecting data necessary to understand the design implications of each draft alignment. It focuses primarily on survey work,which will help in identifying where structures may be needed and could impact final costs. • Collection of survey data to help with alignment designs. January 2019—February 2019. 2. Develop Preferred Alignment: This task works to develop draft alignments for consideration, evaluate and rank the alignments and establish a preferred project alignment. • Develop draft alignments for consideration. January 2019—March 2019 • Develop evaluation criteria used to rank draft alignments. Potential criteria may include cost, user experience, environmental impacts, and more.January 2019 —March 2019 • Identify a project-preferred alternative based on the evaluation criteria and public comments. March 2019—June 2019 3. Cost Estimates: This task creates 10-20% engineer's cost estimates to help understand the cost associated with draft and preferred alignments. QBS—Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita to Tualatin 8 1 Page Close—November 8, 2018—2:00 pm • Prepare draft cost estimates for the draft alignments. March 2019—June 2019 • Prepare a final cost estimate for the preferred alignment. This number will be used in the future to seek funding for final design and construction. June 2019 4. Final Documentation: Document key decisions and prepare for next steps. • Prepare technical memorandum that outlines alternatives, selection process, evaluation criteria, public involvement, and final alignment. July 2019—September 2019 • Prepare project scoping documents that can be used for next phase of design and construction. July 2019—September 2019 SECTION 4 SCOPE AND SCHEDULE OF WORK The project work scope is anticipated to include the following tasks: A. Project Management This task includes project start-up, regular check-ins with City project management team, monthly status reports, and consultant team management. B. Data Collection Collection of relevant data needed to complete the alignment analysis and cost estimating. This may include: survey data,wetland and environmental data,hydraulic data,geotechnical data, etc. C. Public Involvement Public involvement efforts will be led by the City. The consultant team will need to help prepare figures, graphics, and written material for use at public open houses, stakeholder meetings, and the City website. Consultant staff will also need to be present at public involvement activities to help answer questions and hear input first hand. D. Develop Final Alignment Develop draft alignment alternatives for the trail connection between SW Bonita Road and the Tualatin River. With the help of stakeholders,develop evaluation criteria to be used to rank/prioritize draft alternatives and establish a preferred alternative. Suggested evaluation criteria may include cost, user experience, environmental impacts, and more. E. Cost Estimates Develop 10 - 20% engineer's cost estimates for draft alignment alternatives and the preferred final alignment. The cost estimate for the preferred final alignment will be used seek funding for future final design and construction. To help establish unit costs, it is recommended this task include a review of recently bid trail projects in the area. F. Final Design Project Scoping Documents Assist City staff in in preparing project scoping documents for the final design. QBS—Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita to Tualatin 9 1 Page Close—November 8, 2018—2:00 pm SECTION 5 PROPOSAL CONTENT AND FORMAT G. FORMAT To provide a degree of consistency in review of the written proposals, firms are requested to prepare their proposals in the standard format specified below. Proposal to be limited to 15 pages (not including title page, transmittal letter, table of contents, or appendices),with each side counting as a page, 8 1/2x 11 paper size, 11-point minimum font. 1. Title Page Proposer should identify the RFP Title, name and title of contact person, address, telephone number, fax number, email address, and date of submission. 2. Transmittal Letter The transmittal letter should be not more than two (2) pages long and should include as a minimum the following: a. A brief statement of the Proposer's understanding of the project and services to be performed; b. A positive commitment to perform the services within the time period specified, starting and completing the project within the deadlines stated in this RFP; and the names of persons authorized to represent the Proposer, their title, address, and telephone number (if different from the individual who signs the transmittal letter). 3. Table of Contents The table of contents should include a clear and complete identification by section and page number of the materials submitted. 4. Project Understanding,Approach, and Interest Describe in narrative form, with tables, timelines, or other figures as desired, the Proposers understanding of the type of work and the proposed approach/process and technical plan for accomplishing the work listed herein. Explain why the proposed team is interested in this work. Provide information to fill out the scope/work tasks listed in section 4 of this RFP. 5. Consultant Team Organization and Qualifications Proposers are required to give sufficient information of their proposed team and experiences to permit the City to understand and verify the exact nature of the contributions made by the consultant. Provide information about the prime consultant firm and(if applicable) any proposed subconsultants. Provide a proposed project team organization chart and clearly delineate areas of work responsibility. List and provide brief bio's for key project staff who will be assigned to this project and the project percentage of work assigned to them to complete. 6. Consultant Team Experience with Similar Projects Provide the details of experience and past performance of the proposed team on comparable projects for other agencies. Include a table listing relevant projects with title, type of project, type(s) of relevant tasks completed, client, year project was completed, and which project team members work on each project. Provide detailed project description (up to 1 side of 1 page for each project) for up to 5 representative projects — descriptions should include project name, location, client contact information, project completion date, and description of relevant work completed. QBS—Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita to Tualatin 10 1 Page Close—November 8, 2018—2:00 pm The City reserves the right to investigate the references and past performance of any application respect to its successful performance of similar projects, compliance with specifications and contractual obligations and its completion of a project on schedule. 7. Project Management Describe the proposed consultant project manager's experience with relevant projects. Explain the project manager's approach to managing a team of professionals for a planning project with a variety of issues/components and multiple stakeholders. Describe the proposed approach to communications with the City project manager, staff, and advisory committee. Describe the proposed approach to schedule,budget, scope and change management. City staff are sensitive to making sure the proposed key identified staff continue to work on the project throughout its completion. Identify how the proposed consultant project manager will work to ensure this. B. ADDITIONAL SERVICES Provide a brief description of any other services that your firm could provide the City Such services would be contracted for on an "as needed" basis likely via an amendment to the contract so long a not drastically altering the scope of work. C. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Please provide any other information you feel would help the Selection Committee evaluate your firm for this project. D. DISPUTES Should any doubt or difference of opinion arise between the City and a Proposer as to the items to be furnished hereunder or the interpretation of the provisions of this RFP, the decision of the City shall be final and binding upon all parties. E. CITY PERSONNEL No Officer, agent, consultant or employee of the City shall be permitted any interest in the contract. SECTION 6 PROPOSAL EVALUATION PROCEDURES A. SELECTION AND EVALUATION PROCESS A Selection Committee assembled by the City will review the written proposals. Proposals will be evaluated to determine which ones best meet the needs of the City. After meeting the mandatory requirements, the proposals will be evaluated on their technical aspects. The Selection Committee will select the Proposer which best meets the City's needs based upon its evaluation of a Proposer proposal. Proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the following: 1. Completed proposal submitted on time Pass Fail 2. An original plus one electronic copy of the complete proposal Pass Fail 3. Transmittal letter Pass Fail 4. Project Understanding,Approach, and Interest 40 points 5. Consultant Team Organization and Qualifications 20 points 6. Consultant Team Experience with Similar Projects 20 points 7. Project Management 20 points TOTAL EVALUATION POINTS 100 POINTS QBS—Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita to Tualatin 11 1 Page Close—November 8, 2018—2:00 pm B. INVESTIGATION OF REFERENCES The City reserves the right to investigate references and the past performance of any Proposer with respect to its successful performance of similar projects, compliance with specifications and contractual obligations,its completion or delivery of a project on schedule,and its lawful payment of employees and workers. C. CLARIFICATION OF PROPOSALS The City reserves the right to obtain clarification of any point in regards to a proposal or to obtain additional information necessary to properly evaluate a particular proposal. Failure of a Proposer to respond to such a request for additional information or clarification could result in rejection of their proposal. D. NEGOTIATIONS WITH TOP RANKED FIRM Upon review of the proposals submitted,the City will enter into negotiations with the top ranked firm on a price for the work. If the City and the top ranked firm is unable after good faith negotiations to agree to a price,the City will move to the second ranked firm and enter into negotiations. The process shall repeat until either the City and a firm come to an agreed upon price or the City determines the project unfeasible at this time and elects to rescope and resolicit the work. E. PROTEST OF AWARD In accordance with Tigard Public Contracting Rule 30.135,any adversely affected Proposer has seven (7) calendar days from the date of the written notice of award to file a written protest. F. PROPOSAL REJECTION The City reserves the right to: 1. Reject any or all proposals not in compliance with all public procedures and requirements; 2. Reject any proposal not meeting the specifications set forth herein; 3. Waive any or all irregularities in proposals submitted; 4. In the event two or more proposals shall be for the same amount for the same work,the City shall follow the provisions of LCRB 30.095 and Section 137-095 of the Oregon Attorney General's Model Public Contract Manual; 5. Reject all proposals; 6. Award any or all parts of any proposal; and 7. Request references and other data to determine responsiveness. QBS—Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita to Tualatin 12 1 Page Close—November 8, 2018—2:00 pm SECTION 7 PROPOSAL CERTIFICATIONS Non-discrimination Clause The Contractor agrees not to discriminate against any client, employee or applicant for employment or for services, because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, handicap or age with regard to, but not limited to,the following:employment upgrading,demotion or transfer;recruitment or recruitment advertising;layoffs or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; selection for training; rendition of services. It is further understood that any contractor who is in violation of this clause shall be barred from receiving awards of any purchase order from the City,unless a satisfactory showing is made that discriminatory practices have terminated and that a recurrence of such acts is unlikely. Agreed by: Firm Name: Address: ***************************************** Resident Certificate Please Check One: ❑ Resident Vendor: Vendor has paid unemployment taxes and income taxes in this state during the last twelve calendar months immediately preceding the submission of this proposal. Or ❑ Non-resident Vendor: Vendor does not qualify under requirement stated above. (Please specify your state of residence: 1 Officer's signature: Type or print officer's name: QBS—Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita to Tualatin 13 1 Page Close—November 8, 2018—2:00 pm SECTION 8 SIGNATURE PAGE The undersigned proposes to perform all work as listed in the Specification section and that all articles supplied under any resultant contract will conform to the specifications herein, The undersigned agrees to be bound by all applicable laws and regulations, the accompanying specifications, and by City policies and regulations. The undersigned, by submitting a proposal, represents that: A) The Proposer has read and understands the specifications. B) Failure to comply with the specifications or any terms of the Request for Proposal may disqualify the Proposer as being non-responsive. The undersigned certifies that the proposal has been arrived at independently and has been submitted without any collusion designed to limit competition. The undersigned certifies that all addenda to the specifications has been received and duly considered with all addenda have been included in this proposal: Addenda: No. through No. inclusive. We therefore offer and make this proposal to furnish services herein in fulfillment of the attached requirements and specifications of the City. Name of firm: Address: Telephone Number: Fax Number: By: Date: (Signature of Authorized Official. If partnership, signature of one partner.) Typed Name/Title: If corporation, attest: (Corporate Officer) ❑ Corporation ❑ Partnership ❑ Individual Federal Tax Identification Number (TIN): QBS—Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita to Tualatin 14 Page Close—November 8, 2018—2:00 pm ATTACHMENT A CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ADDENDA Project Title: Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita Rd to Tualatin River Close: November 8, 2018-2:0012m I/WE HAVE RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING ADDENDA (If none received, write `None Received'): 1. 3. 2. 4. Date Signature of Proposer Title Corporate Name QBS—Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita to Tualatin 15 1 Page Close—November 8, 2018—2:00 pm ATTACHMENT B CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON STATEMENT OF PROPOSAL Name of Consultant: Mailing Address: Contact Person: Telephone: Fax: Email: accepts all the terms and conditions contained in the City of Tigard's Qualification Based Request for Proposal for the Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita Rd to Tualatin River project and the attached engineering services agreement template (Attachment C): Signature of authorized representative Date Type or print name of authorized representative Telephone Number Type or print name of person(s) authorized to negotiate contracts Telephone Number QBS—Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita to Tualatin 16 1 Page Close—November 8, 2018—2:00 pm C1966-SQ- ATTACHMENT C CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT STUDY BONITA ROAD TO TUALATIN RIVER THIS AGREEMENT,made and entered into this 19'day of December,2018,by and between the City of Tigard, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "City," and GreenWorks, P.C., whose authorized representative is Mike Faha,hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant." RECITALS WHEREAS, the City's Fiscal Year 2018-2019 budget provides for consulting services for the Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study for the Bonita Road to Tualatin River portion of the project;and WHEREAS, the accomplishment of the work and services described in this Agreement is necessary and essential to the public works improvement program of the City;and WHEREAS, the City desires to engage the Consultant to render professional services for the project described in this Agreement, and the Consultant is willing and qualified to perform such services; THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereby agree as follows: 1. Consultant's Scope of Services The Consultant shall perform professional consulting services relevant to the Project in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth herein,and as provided in Exhibit 1,which is attached hereto and by this reference made a part of this Agreement. 2. Effective Date and Duration This agreement shall become effective upon the date of execution and shall expire, unless otherwise terminated or extended,upon completion of the work or December 31,2019,whichever comes first. All work under this Agreement shall be completed prior to the expiration of this Agreement. 3. Consultant's Fee A. Basic Fee 1) As compensation for Basic Services as described in Exhibit 1 of this Agreement, and for services required in the fulfillment of Paragraph 1, the Consultant shall be paid on an hourly rate based upon the"Schedule of Rates" in Exhibit 1 of this agreement,which shall constitute full and complete payment for said services and all e::penditures which may be made and expenses incurred, except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement. The Basic Fee shall not exceed the amount of One Hundred Forty-Eight Thousand Two Hundred Twenty-Four and No/100 Dollars ($148,224.00) without prior written authorization. 2) The parties hereto do expressly agree that the Basic Fee is based upon the Scope of Services to be provided by the Consultant and is not necessarily related to the estimated construction cost of the Project. In the event that the actual construction cost differs from the estimated construction cost, the Consultant's compensation will not be adjusted unless the Scope of Services to be provided by the Consultant changes and is authorized and accepted by the City. B. Payment Schedule for Basic Fee Payments shall be made upon receipt of billings based on the work completed. Billings shall be submitted by the Consultant periodically,but not more frequently than monthly. Payment by the City shall release the City from any further obligation for payment to the Consultant for service or services performed or expenses incurred as of the date of the statement of sei7-ices. Payment shall be made only for work actually completed as of the date of invoice. Payment shall not be considered acceptance or approval of any work or waiver of any defects therein. C. Payment for Special Services Only when directed in writing by the City,the Consultant shall furnish or acquire for the City the professional and technical services based on the hourly rate schedule as described in Exhibit 1 of this contract for minor project additions and/or alterations. D. Certified Cost Records The Consultant shall furnish certified cost records for all billings pertaining to other than lump sutra fees to substantiate all charges. For such purposes, the books of account of the Consultant shall be subject to audit by the City. The Consultant shall complete work and cost records for all billings on such forms and in such manner as will be satisfactory to the City. E. Contract Identification The Consultant shall furnish to the City its employer identification number, as designated by the Internal Revenue Service, or social security number,as the City deems applicable. F. Pg=ent—General 1) Consultant shall pay to the Department of Revenue all sums withheld from employees pursuant to ORS 316.167. 2) Consultant shall pay employees at least time and a half pay for all overtime worked in excess of 40 hours in any one week except for individuals under the contract who are excluded under ORS 653.010 to 653.261 or under 29 USC sections 201 to 209 from receiving overtime. 3) Consultant shall promptly, as due, make payment to any person, co-partnership, association or corporation, furnishing medical, surgical and hospital care or other needed care and attention incident to sickness or injury to the employees of Consultant or all sums which Consultant agrees to pay for such services and all moneys and sums which Consultant collected or deducted from the wages of employees pursuant to any law, contract or agreement for the purpose of providing or paying for such service. 4) The City certifies that sufficient funds are available and authorized for expenditure to finance costs of this contract. 5) Consultant shall make payments promptly, as due, to all persons supplying services or materials for work covered under this contract. Consultant shall not permit any lien or claim to be filed or prosecuted against the City on any account of any service or materials furnished. 2019 PrSA—Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita to Tualatin 2 P g e 6) If Consultant fails, neglects or refuses to make prompt payment of any claim for labor, materials, or services furnished to Consultant, sub-consultant or subcontractor by any person as such claim becomes due,City may pay such claim and charge the amount of the payment against funds due or to become due to the Consultant. The payment of the claim in this manner shall not relieve Consultant or their surety from obligation with respect to any unpaid claims. 4. Ownership of Plans and Documents: Records A. The field notes, design notes, and original drawings of the construction plans, as instruments of service, are and shall remain, the property of the Consultant; however, the City shall be furnished, at no additional cost, one set of previously approved reproducible drawings, on 3 mil minimum thickness mylar as well as diskette in"DWG"or"DXF" format,of the original drawings of the work. The City shall have unlimited authority to use the materials received from the Consultant in any way the City deems necessary. B. The City shall make copies, for the use of and without cost to the Consultant, of all of its maps, records, laboratory tests, or other data pertinent to the work to be performed by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, and also make available any other maps, records, or other materials available to the City from any other public agency=or body. C. The Consultant shall furnish to the City,copies of all maps,records, field notes,and soil tests which were developed in the course of work for the City and for which compensation has been received by the Consultant at no additional expense to the City except as provided elsewhere in this Agreement. 5. Assignment/Delegation Neither party shall assign, sublet or transfer any interest in or duty under this Agreement without the written consent of the other and no assignment shall be of any force or effect whatsoever unless and until the other party has so consented. If City agrees to assignment of tasks to a subcontract,Consultant shall be fully responsible for the acts or omissions of any subcontractors and of all persons employed by them, and neither the approval by City of any subcontractor not anything contained herein shall be deemed to create any contractual relation between the subcontractor and City. 6. Consultant is Independent Contractor A. The City's project director, or designee, shall be responsible for determining whether Consultant's work product is satisfactory and consistent with this agreement,but Consultant is not subject to the direction and control of the City. Consultant shall be an independent contractor for all purposes and shall be entitled to no compensation other than the compensation provided for under Section 3 of this Agreement. B. Consultant is an independent contractor and not an employee of City. Consultant acknowledges Consultant's status as an independent contractor and acknowledges that Consultant is not an employee of the City for purposes of workers compensation law,public employee benefits law, or any other law. All persons retained by Consultant to provide services under this contract are employees of Consultant and not of City. Consultant acknowledges that it is not entitled to benefits of any kind to which a City employee is entitled and that it shall be solely responsible for workers compensation coverage for its employees and all other payments and taxes required by law. Furthermore,in the event that Consultant is found by a court of law or an administrative agency to be an employee of the City for any purpose, City shall be entitled to offset compensation due, or to demand repayment of any 2019 PrSA—Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita to Tualatin 3 1 Page i I amounts paid to Consultant under the terms of the agreement,to the full extent of any benefits or other remuneration Consultant receives (from City or third party) as a result of said finding and to the full extent of any payments that City is required to make (to Consultant or to a third party) as a result of said finding. C. The undersigned Consultant hereby represents that no employee of the City or any partnership or corporation in which a City employee has an interest, has or will receive any remuneration of any description from the Consultant, either directly or indirectly, in connection with the letting or performance of this Agreement, except as specifically declared in writing. D. If this payment is to be charged against Federal funds, Consultant certifies that he/she is not currently employed by the Federal Government and the amount charged does not exceed his/her normal charge for the type of service provided. E. Consultant and its employees,if any,are not active members of the Oregon Public Employees Retirement System and are not employed for a total of 600 hours or more in the calendar year by any public employer participating in the Retirement System. F. Consultant shall obtain, prior to the execution of any performance under this Agreement, a City of Tigard Business License. The Tigard Business License is based on a calendar year with a December 31st expiration date. New businesses operating in Tigard after June 30th of the current year will pay a pro-rated fee though the end of the calendar year. G. Consultant is not an officer, employee, or agent of the City as those terms are used in ORS 30.265. 7. Indemnity A. The City has relied upon the professional ability and training of the Consultant as a material inducement to enter into this Agreement. Consultant represents to the City that the work under this contract will be performed in accordance with the professional standards of skill and care ordinarily- exercised by members of the Consultant's profession under similar conditions and circumstances as well as the requirements of applicable federal, state and local laws, it being understood that acceptance of an Consultant's work by the City shall not operate as a waiver or release. Acceptance of documents by City does not relieve Consultant of any responsibility for design deficiencies, errors or omissions. B. Claims for other than Professional Liability. Consultant agrees and shall indemnify, defend, save and hold harmless the City of Tigard,its officers, employees, agents, and representatives from all claims, suits, or actions and all expenses incidental to the investigation and defense thereof, of whatsoever nature, including intentional acts resulting from or arising out of the activities of Consultant or its subcontractors, sub-consultants, agents or employees in performance of this contract at both trial and appeal level, whether or not a trial or appeal ever takes place including any hearing before federal or state administrative agencies.. If any aspect of this indemnity shall be found to be illegal or invalid for any reason whatsoever, such illegality or invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this indemnification. C. Claims for Professional Liability. Consultant agrees and shall indemnify, defend, save and hold harmless the City of Tigard, its officers, employees, agents, and representatives from all claims, suits,or actions and all expenses incidental to the investigation and defense thereof, arising out of the professional negligent acts, errors or omissions of Consultant or its subcontractors, sub- consultants, agents or employees in performance of professional services under this agreement. 2019 PrSA—Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita to Tualatin 4 1 Page Any work by Consultant that results in a design of a facility that is not readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities shall be considered a professionally negligent act, error or omission. D. As used in subsections B and C of this section, a claim for professional responsibility is a claim made against the City in which the City's alleged liability results directly or indirectly,in whole or in part,from the quality of the professional services provided by Consultant,regardless of the type of claim made against the City in performance of this contract. A claim for other than professional responsibility is a claim made against the City in which the City's alleged liability results from an act or omission by Consultant unrelated to the quality of professional services provided by Consultant in performance of this contract. 8. Insurance Consultant and its subcontractors shall maintain insurance acceptable to City in full force and effect throughout the term of this contract. Such insurance shall cover risks arising directly or indirectly out of Consultant's activities or work hereunder,including the operations of its subcontractors of any tier. Such insurance shall include provisions that such insurance is primary insurance with respect to the interests of City and that any other insurance maintained by City is excess and not contributory insurance with the insurance required hereunder. The policy or policies of insurance maintained by the Consultant and its subcontractors shall provide at least the following limits and coverages: A. Commercial General Liability Insurance Consultant shall obtain,at Consultant's expense,and keep in effect during the term of this contract, Comprehensive General Liability Insurance covering Bodily Injury and Propert;• Damage on an "occurrence" form (CG 2010 1185 or equivalent). This coverage shall include Contractual Liability insurance for the indemnity provided under this contract. The following insurance will be carried: Coverage . Limit General Aggregate $3,000,000 Products-Completed Operations Aggregate $2,000,000 Personal&Advertising Injury $1,000,000 Each Occurrence $2,000,000 Fire Damage (Any one fire) $50,000 B. Professional Liability Consultant shall obtain,at Consultant's expense,and keep in effect during the term of this contract, Professional Liability Insurance covering any damages caused by an error,omission or any negligent acts. Combined single limit per claim shall not be less than $2,000,000, or the equivalent. Annual aggregate limit shall not be less than$3,000,000 and filed on a"claims-made"form. C. Commercial Automobile Insurance Consultant shall also obtain, at Consultant's expense, and keep in effect during the term of the contract(Symbol l or Symbols 8 and 9 as applicable) Commercial Automobile Liability coverage on an "occurrence" form including coverage for all owned, hired, and non-owned vehicles. The Combined Single Limit per occurrence shall not be less than$2,000,000. If Contractor operates a personally-owned vehicle for business use under this contract,the Contractor shall obtain, at Contractor's expense, and keep in effect during the term of the contract, business 2019 PrSA—Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita to Tualatin 5 1 P a g automobile liability coverage for all owned vehicles on an"occurrence"form. The Combined Single Limit per occurrence shall not be less than$2,000,000. D. Workers' Compensation Insurance The Consultant,its subcontractors,if any,and all employers providing work,labor or materials under this Contract are subject employers under the Oregon Workers'Compensation Law and shall comply with ORS 656.017, which requires them to provide workers' compensation coverage that satisfies Oregon law for all their subject workers. Out-of-state employers must pro-.ide Oregon workers' compensation coverage for their workers who work at a single location within Oregon for more than 30 days in a calendar year. Consultants who perform work without the assistance or labor of any employee need not obtain such coverage. This shall include Employer's Liability Insurance with coverage limits of not less than$1,000,000 each accident. E. Additional Insured Provision All policies aforementioned, other than Workers' Compensation and Professional Liability, shall include the City its officers,employees,agents and representatives as additional insureds with respect to this contract. Coverage will be endorsed to provide a"per project" aggregate. F. Extended Reppordng Coverage If any of the aforementioned liability insurance is arranged on a "claims-made" basis, Extended Reporting coverage will be required at the completion of this contract to a duration of 24 months or the maximum time period the Consultant's insurer will provide such if less than 24 months. Consultant will be responsible for furnishing certification of Extended Reporting coverage as described or continuous "claims-made" liability coverage for 24 months following contract completion. Continuous "claims-made" coverage will be acceptable in lieu of Extended Reporting coverage, provided its retroactive date is on or before the effective date of this contract. Coverage will be endorsed to provide a"per project"aggregate. G. Insurance Carrier Rating Coverage provided by the Consultant must be underwritten by an insurance company deemed acceptable by the City. All policies of insurance must be written by companies having an A.M.Best rating of"A`'II" or better, or equivalent. The City reserves the right to reject all or any insurance carrier(s)with an unacceptable financial rating. H. Self-Insurance The City understands that some Contractors may self-insure for business risks and the City will consider whether such self-insurance is acceptable if it meets the minimum insurance requirements for the type of coverage required. If the Contractor is self-insured for commercial general liability or automobile liability insurance the Contractor must provide evidence of such self-insurance. The Contractor must provide a Certificate of Insurance showing evidence of the coverage amounts on a form acceptable to the City. The City reserves the right in its sole discretion to determine whether self-insurance is adequate. I. Certificates of Insurance As e-vidence of the insurance coverage required by the contract, the Consultant shall furnish a Certificate of Insurance to the City. No contract shall be effective until the required Certificates of Insurance have been received and approved by the City. The certificate will specify and document all provisions within this contract and include a copy of Additional Insured Endorsement. A renewal certificate will be sent to the address below prior to coverage expiration. 2019 PrSA—Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita to Tualatin 6 j Paur, J. Independent Contractor Status The service or services to be rendered under this contract are those of an independent contractor. Contractor is not an officer, employee or agent of the City as those terms are used in ORS 30.265. K. Primary Coverage Clarification The parties agree that Consultant's coverage shall be primary to the extent permitted by law. The parties further agree that other insurance maintained by the City is excess and not contributory insurance with the insurance required in this section. L. Cross-Liability Clause A cross-liability clause or separation of insureds clause vill be included in all general liability and commercial automobile policies required by this contract. A certificate in form satisfactory to the City certifying to the issuance of such insurance will be forwarded to: City of Tigard Atm: Contracts and Purchasing Office 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,Oregon 97223 At the discretion of the City, a copy of each insurance policy, certified as a true copy by an authorized representative of the issuing insurance company may be required to be forwarded to the above address. Such policies or certificates must be delivered prior to commencement of the work. The procuring of such required insurance shall not be construed to limit Consultant's liability Hereunder. Notwithstanding said insurance,Consultant shall be obligated for the total amount of any damage,injury, or loss caused by negligence or neglect connected with this contract. 9. Termination Without Cause At any time and without cause,City shall have the right in its sole discretion,to terminate this Agreement by giving notice to Consultant. If City terminates the contract pursuant to this paragraph, it shall pay Consultant for services rendered to the date of termination. 10. Termination With Cause A. City may terminate this Agreement effective upon delivery of written notice to Consultant,or at such later date as may be established by City,under any of the following conditions: 1) If City funding from federal, state, local, or other sources is not obtained and continued at levels sufficient to allow for the purchase of the indicated quantity of services. This Agreement may be modified to accommodate a reduction in funds. 2) If Federal or State regulations or guidelines are modified, changed, or interpreted in such a way that the sen-ices are no longer allowable or appropriate for purchase under this Agreement. 2019 PrSA —Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita to Tualatin 7 a g 3) If any license or certificate required by law or regulation to be held by Consultant,its subcontractors, agents, and employees to provide the services required by this Agreement is for any reason denied,revoked, or not renewed. 4) If Consultant becomes insolvent,if voluntary or involuntary petition in bankruptcy is filed by or against Consultant,if a receiver or trustee is appointed for Consultant,or if there is an assignment for the benefit of creditors of Consultant. Any such termination of this agreement under paragraph (A) shall be without prejudice to any obligations or liabilities of either party already accrued prior to such termination. B. City, by written notice of default (including breach of contract) to Consultant,may terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement: 1) If Consultant fails to provide services called for by this agreement within the time specified herein or any extension thereof,or 2) If Consultant fails to perform any of the other provisions of this Agreement, or so fails to pursue the work as to endanger performance of this agreement in accordance with its terms,and after receipt of written notice from City,fails to correct such failures within ten days or such other period as City may authorize. 3) If Consultant fails to eliminate a conflict as described in Section 14 of this agreement. The rights and remedies of City provided in the above clause related to defaults (including breach of contract)by Consultant shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Agreement. If City terminates this Agreement under paragraph (B),Consultant shall be entitled to receive as full payment for all services satisfactorily rendered and expenses incurred,an amount which bears the same ratio to the total fees specified in this Agreement as the services satisfactorily rendered by Consultant bear to the total services otherwise required to be performed for such total fee;provided, that there shall be deducted from such amount the amount of damages,if any, sustained by City due to breach of contract by Consultant. Damages for breach of contract shall be those allowed by Oregon law, reasonable and necessary attorney fees, and other costs of litigation at trial and upon appeal. 11. Non-Waiver The failure of City to insist upon or enforce strict performance by Consultant of any of the terms of this Agreement or to exercise any rights hereunder, should not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment to any extent of its rights to assert or rely upon such terms or rights on any future occasion. 12. Method and Place of Giving Notice, Submitting Bills and Making Payments All notices,bills and payments shall be made in writing and may be given by personal delivery,mail, or b� fax. Payments may be made by personal delivery,mail,or electronic transfer. The following addresses shall be used to transmit notices,bills,payments,and other information: 2019 PrSA—Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita to Tualatin 8 P g c CITY OF TIGARD GREENWORKS,P.C. Attn: Tegan Enloe,PE Attn:Mike Faha 'address, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Address: 24 NW 2"a Avenue, Suite 100 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Portland, Oregon 97209 Phone: (503) 718-2442 Phone: (503) 222-5612 Email: tcc.. gne a ti�a d_ L. v Email: mika i,�eenworks c. .oir, and when so addressed,shall be deemed given upon deposit in the United States mail,postage prepaid, or when so faxed, shall be deemed given upon successful fax. In all other instances, notices,bills and payments shall be deemed given at the time of actual delivery. Changes may be made in the names and addresses of the person to whom notices, bills and payments are to be given by giving written notice pursuant to this paragraph. 13. Merger This writing is intended both as a final expression of the Agreement between the parties with respect to the included terms and as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the Agreement. No modification of this Agreement shall be effective unless and until it is made in writing and signed b;� both parties. 14. Professional Services The City requires that services provided pursuant to this agreement shall be provided to the City by an Consultant,which does not represent clients on matters contrary to City interests. Further,Consultant shall not engage services of an Consultant and/or other professional who individually, or through members of his/her same firm,represents clients on matters contrary to City interests. Should the Consultant represent clients on matters contrary to City interests or engage the services of an Consultant and/or other professional who individually, or through members of his/her same firm, represents clients on matters contrary to City interests, Consultant shall consult with the appropriate City representative regarding the conflict. After such consultation, the Consultant shall have seven (7) days to eliminate the conflict to the satisfaction of the City. If such conflict is not eliminated within the specified time period,the agreement may be terminated pursuant to Section 10 (B -3) of this agreement. 15. Force Majeure Neither City not Consultant shall be considered in default because of any delays in completion and responsibilities hereunder due to causes beyond the control and without fault or negligence on the part of the parties so disenabled, including but not restricted to, an act of God or of a public enemy, civil unrest, volcano, earthquake, fire, flood, epidemic, quarantine restriction, area-wide strike, freight embargo, unusually severe weather or delay of subcontractor or supplies due to such cause;provided that the parties so disenabled shall within ten days from the beginning of such delay, notify the other party in writing of the cause of delay and its probable extent. Such notification shall not be the basis for a claim for additional compensation. Each party shall,however,make all reasonable efforts to remove or eliminate such a cause of delay or default and shall, upon cessation of the cause, diligently pursue performance of its obligation under the Agreement. 2019 PrSA—Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita to Tualatin 9 1 P a n e 16. Non-Discrimination. Consultant agrees to comply with all applicable requirements of federal and state civil rights and rehabilitation statues, rules, and regulations. Consultant also shall comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990,ORS 659A.142,and all regulations and administrative rules established pursuant to those laws. 17. Errors Consultant shall perform such additional work as may be necessary to correct errors in the work required under this Agreement v.ithout undue delays and without additional cost. 18. Extra (Changes)Work Only the City's Project Manager,may authorize extra (and/or change) work. Failure of Consultant to secure authorization for e-_tra work shall constitute a waiver of all right to adjustment in the contract price or contract time due to such unauthorized extra work and Consultant thereafter shall be entitled to no compensation whatsoever for the performance of such work. 19. Choice of Law,Venue The provisions of this Agreement are governed by Oregon law. Venue will be the State of Oregon Circuit Court in Washington County or the US District Court for Oregon,Portland. 20. Compliance With Atplicable Law Consultant shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws and ordinances applicable to the work under this Agreement,including those set forth in ORS 279A,279B,and 279C. 21. Conflict Between Terms It is further expressly agreed by and between the parties hereto that should there be any conflict between the terms of this instrument in the proposal of the contract, this instrument shall control and nothing herein shall be considered as an acceptance of the said terms of said pro poral conflicting herewith. 22. Access to Records City shall have access to such books, documents, papers and records of Consultant as are directly pertinent to this Agreement for the purpose of making audit, examination, excerpts and transcripts. 23. Audit Consultant shall maintain records to assure conformance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and to assure adequate performance and accurate expenditures within the contract period. Consultant agrees to permit City,the State of Oregon,the federal government, or their duly authorized representatives to audit all records pertaining to this Agreement to assure the accurate expenditure of funds. 24. Severability In the event any provision or portion of this Agreement is held to be unenforceable or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction,the validity of the remaining terms and provisions shall not be affected to the extent that it did not materially affect the intent of the parties when they entered into the agreement. 25. Industrial Accident Fund Payment Consultant shall pay any and all contributions or amount due the Industrial Accident Fund form that Consultant or subcontractors incur during the performance of this Agreement. 2019 PrSA—Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita to Tualatin 10 1 ? a or e 26. Representations and Warranties Consultant represents and warrants to the City that: A. Consultant has the power and authority to enter into and perform this Agreement. B. This Agreement, when executed and delivered, is a valid and binding obligation of Consultant, enforceable in accordance with its terms. C. Consultant (to the best of Consultant's knowledge, after due inquiry), for a period of no fewer than six calendar years (or since the firm's inception if less than that) preceding the effective date of this Agreement, faithfully has complied with: 1) All tax laws of this state, including but not limited to ORS 305.620 and ORS chapters 316, 317,and 318; 2) Any tax provisions imposed by a political subdivision of this state that applied to Consultant, to Consultant's property, operations, receipts, or income, or to Consultant's performance of or compensation for any work performed by Consultant; 3) Any tax provisions imposed by a political subdivision of this state that applied to Consultant, or to goods,services,or property,whether tangible or intangible,provided by Consultant;and 4) Any rules,regulations,charter provisions,or ordinances that implemented or enforced any of the foregoing tax laws or protisions. D. Any intellectual property rights or such delivered to the City under this Agreement, and Consultant's services rendered in the performance of Consultant's obligations under this Agreement, shall be provided to the City free and clear of any and all restrictions on or conditions of use,transfer,modification,or assignment,and shall be free and clear of any and all liens,claims, mortgages, security interests,liabilities, charges,and encumbrances of any kind. 27. Compliance with Tax Laws A. Consultant must, throughout the duration of this Agreement and any extensions, comply with all tax laws of this state and all applicable tax laws of any political subdivision of the State of Oregon. For the purposes of this Section,"tax laws"includes all the provisions described in subsection 25.C. 1) through 4) of this Agreement. B. Any violation of subsection A of this section shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement. Further, any violation of Consultant's warranty, in subsection 25.0 of this Agreement, that the Consultant has complied with the tax laws of the State of Oregon and the applicable tax laws of any political subdivision of this state also shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement. Any violation shall entitle the City to terminate this Agreement,to pursue and recover any and all damages that arise from the breach and the termination of this Agreement, and to pursue any or all of the remedies available under this Agreement,at law,or in equity,including but not limited to: 1) Termination of this Agreement,in whole or in part; 2) Exercise of the right,of setoff, and withholding of amounts otherwise due and owing to Consultant,in an amount equal to State's setoff right,without penalty;and 3) Initiation of an action or proceeding for damages, specific performance, declaratory or injunctive relief. The City shall be entitled to recover any and all damages suffered as the result of Consultant's breach of this Agreement, including but not limited to direct, indirect, 2019 PrSA—Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita to Tualatin 111 P a g Q incidental and consequential damages, costs of cure, and costs incurred in securing a replacement Consultant. These remedies are cumulative to the extent the remedies are not inconsistent,and the City may pursue any remedy or remedies singly, collectively, successively, or in any order whatsoever. 28. Complete Agreement This Agreement,including the exhibits,is intended both as a final expression of the Agreement between the Parties and as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms. In the event of an inconsistency between a provision in the main body of the Agreement and a provision in the Exhibits,the provision in the main body of the Agreement shall control. In the event of an inconsistency between Exhibit.1 and Exhibit 2,Exhibit 1 shall control. No waiver, consent, modification, or change of terms of this Agreement shall bind either party unless in writing and signed by both parties. Such waiver, consent, modification, or change if made, shall be effective only in specific instances and for the specific purpose given. There are no understandings, agreements, or representations, oral or written, not specified herein regarding this Agreement. Consultant,by the signature of its authorized representative,hereby acknowledges that he/she has read this Agreement,understands it and agrees to be bound by its terms and conditions. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City has caused this Agreement to be executed by its duly authorized undersigned officer and Consultant has executed this Agreement on the date hereinabove first written. Contract was awarded by Tigard's Local Contract Review Board at their December 18,2018 business meeting. CITY OF TIGA" GREENWORn,P.C. zo- —& yewo"^- .0 . - "It By: Marty Wine,City Manager By:Authorized Contractor Representative Date Date 2019 PrSA—Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita to Tualatin U g EXHIBIT 1 SCOPE OF SERVICES Task 1: Project Management The Project Management Phase includes time for project start up, design team meetings, client meetings, as well as general project coordination. Subtasks 1.1 Project Start up(QV Set up internal project files and subcontracts with subconsultant team. 1.2 Prepare Project Schedule (GWS A detailed project schedule will be prepared in MS Project that will have dates for tasks, milestones, and meetings.The schedule will be updated as needed throughout the duration of the project. 1.3 Client Meetings (GW-6.KPFF-C-2, KPFF-S-1,PHS-1, GTE-1,HDR-1� Regular Client meetings will occur with the Core Team and City's Project Manager, these meetings are shows in subsequent tasks to show where they would occur during the process. Consultant shall prepare agendas prior to the meeting and meeting notes after each meeting. 1.4 Design Team Meetings (GW KPFF-C-2,KPFF-S-2 PHS-2, GTE-2,HDR-2� Periodic check in meetings with the team to technical inventory and trail alignments. These meetings are shows in subsequent tasks to show where they would occur during the process. 1.5 Monthly Invoices and Progress Reports Administrative time to prepare and submit monthly invoices demonstrating time spent for each task as well as a brief outline describing the work conducted. Consultant will compile subconsultants invoices monthly and send one comprehensive invoice to the Client. 1.6 Project Coordination Time for phone calls, emails, and general project coordination with the Client and Design Team throughout the duration of the project. Note:Client Meetings and Design Team Meetings are also Listed below in Task 2-4 where they would occur. TASK 1 DELIVERABLES: Project Schedule,Meeting Agendas and Notes,Monthly Invoices and Progress Reports Task 2: Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis The Design Team will collect technical data and create a base map that will be used for the duration of the project.The technical data will include but will not be limited to:a wetland determination,ROW and property ownership analysis, property ownership, and floodplain inventory, available survey data, and other available and relevant GIS layers. Consultantwill use the technical data and prepare a Site Analysis / Issues diagram. The Design Team will prepare Design Criteria in a matrix form that will be used to easily-compare pros and cons of trail alignment alternatives in subsequent phases.The data will be compiled for review by the City and Stakeholders,then refined for Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and Public Advisory Committee (PAC) and Open House#1. Consultant will prepare high-quality,illustrative graphic exhibits for the public meetings that will be easy to understand and help gain excitement for the project 2019 PrSA—Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita to Tualatin 13 1 P a g e Subtasks 2.1 Kickoff Meeting: (Consultant, City and Subconsultants) The Design Team willmeet with the Client and conduct a site walk, discuss goals, schedule, and process for the project. 2.2 Technical Inventory and Analysis The Design Team will collect technical data required for this planning level study that will be used for the duration of the project. The technical data will include the following: a) Wetland Determination (PHS) Pacific Habitat Services will conduct a wetland determination which consists of GPS data collected sparsely along the boundaries to increase the accuracy of the work. The wetland determination boundaries, with the appropriate width of Clean Water Services' vegetated corridors, will be transferred to the base map that is used to plan the trail's alignment options. The increased accuracy gained by conducting a wetland determination will ensure the overall accuracy of the project's success. b) Transportation Analysis (GTE) Global Transportation Engineering is on the team to provide input on the traffic elements related to the areas where the trail faces the street ROW. c) Floodplain Analysis (HDR) HDR will use the existing Fanno Creek HEC-RAS model provided by Clean Water Services.The model will be updated by interpolating additional cross sections in the area of interest and adjustments will be made based on the recent bank restoration project in the vicinity of Bonita Road. Terrain updates will be limited to capturing general topography at the site and will not be detailed i.e. no Li.DAR or other 3D surface data will be converted and analyzed to update cross sections. Modeling will be performed using HEC-RAS 1D. The model will not be the FEMA effective model and will not be valid for no-rise documentation for the County and FEMA during later phases of the project. d) ROW and Property Ownership Study) Epic will conduct a ROW and Property Ownership study and provide guidance for trail alignments and acquisition based on state local requirements. It is assumed that there are up to 50 properties to be evaluated. e) Structural Analysis XPFF-S) KPFF Structural Engineers will assemble the Geotechnical findings from the two recent projects most adjacent to this project. (4 Segments of the Fanno Creek Greenway and the CWS Remeander project) as a baseline for the conditions along this segment of trail.These assumptions will be used to establish costs for foundation design for any bridges or boardwalks for costing purposes. 2.3 Aerial Drone Photogratihic Base Mapping(SS) Conduct drone flight and 2D Base map without surveyed ground control points — orthorectified to existing maps. Horizontal accuracy is 1-3 meters. Provide 4 oblique aerial photographs and video fly over of study area. 2.4 Prepare Base Map (TW) . Assemble technical data from above in addition to extracting available GIS data to overlay on top of the Aerial Drone photograph map to use as a working base map. 2.5 Prepare Preliminary-Design Criteria (GWl Consultant will prepare a matrix in a spreadsheet format that outlines the issues that will affect trail alignment decisions such as cost,environmental impacts,constructability,user experience, safety,etc. for the team to use to score trail alignments in subsequent tasks. Each criterion will have a narrative describing what constitutes a high score and low score. 2019 PrSA—Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita to Tualatin 14 1 Page 2.6 Existing Conditions and Analysis Diagrams (G�XX) With input from the Design Team, Consultant will prepare a diagram within the study area of opportunities and constraints that will be a basis for creating trail alignment alternatives in subsequent tasks. Given the length of the study area, the study area will have separated into three to four segments/sheets to illustrate the information at a legible scale. • Design Team Meeting#1: Review Findings and Design Criteria (GW,PHS,KPFF-C,KPFF- S, HDR, GTE) • Client Meeting#1: Review Analysis Findings and Design Criteria (GW,PHS,HDR, GTE) 2.7 Prepare Graphics for PAC,TAC.and Public Meetings (GW� Consultant will prepare graphic exhibits that include illustrative plans, photo boards of existing conditions to facilitate conversations with the stakeholders and public. • Client Meeting#2: Review Public Meeting Materials (GW) 2.8 PAC and TAC Meeting#1 (GW,PHS) Consultant and PHS will attend PAC and TAC Meeting #1 to review and discuss the inventory and analysis findings. Consultant will assume these meetings will be back to back on the same afternoon to maximize efficiency. 2.9 Public Meeting#1 (GW) Consultant shall attend Public meeting #1 to help present the project to the public. It is assumed Tigard will reserve the room and arrange notices and provide a means for assimilating public comments. 2.10 Assess Public Input (GW) Consultant willreview and assess the public feedback provided by Tigard. • Client Meeting#3: Review Public Input and Discuss Next Steps (GW) TASK 2 DELIVERABLES: Base Map in GIS and available City- Files, Aerial Photography, Existing Conditions Plan Graphic—Overall plan at 200 scale and 4 sheets of segments at 60 scale, Opportunities and Constrains Diagrams — 4 sheets at 60 scale and 2 enlargements of intersections at 20 scale, Design Criteria Matrix, Refined Public Meeting Graphics. Task 3:Alternatives Analysis Once feedback is collected from the Inventors• and Analysis phase, Consultant will prepare three (3) preliminary trail alignments and cost estimates. Consultant will have the technical design team members provide a technical evaluation of the trail alternatives related to their respected disciplines and help score the design criteria along with offer suggestions for improving aspects of the alternatives. After any refinements are made, the team will calculate wetland and buffer impacts, analyze floodplain impacts, and initiate conversations with ODOT Rail. The Design Team will use the Design Criteria to score and compare pros and cons of trail alignment alternatives. The alternatives will be reviewed by the City and Stakeholders, then refined for Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and Public Advisory Committee (PAC) and Open House #2. PAC and TAC Meeting#2 could be a walking workshop of each potential trail alignment. Consultant will meet with the City Project Manager to review stakeholder and public input and discuss next steps. Subtasks 3.1 Preliminary Trail Aliggments (GWS Prepare three (3) preliminary alternatives within the study area testing alignment options for the trail. The alignments will be separated into the three to four segments/sheets to illustrate the information 2019 PrSA—Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita to Tualatin 15 1 F a g at a legible scale.20 Scale Enlargements will be prepared to illustrate the street crossings at Bonita and Durham Road. 3.2 Draft Costs for Trail Alignments(GW, KPFF-C,KPFF-S) KPFF Civil will prepare planning level cost estimates for the three trail alignment alternatives which will include quantities unit prices for pay items included in the scope of work:Demolition,Earthwork, Grading,Paving,Bridges,Boardwalks,and RLitigation and Enhancement Plantings.The cost will also include design contingencies and soft costs for the City to better understand the entire cost of the project. • Design Team Meeting #2: Review Trail Alignments (GW, PHS, KPFF-C, KPFF-S, HDR, GTE) 3.3 Technical Evaluations of Trail Alternatives: The Design Team will evaluate score each trail alignment for the following design criteria: a) Wetland and Vegetated Corridor Evaluation (PHS) b) Transportation and ROW Input(GTE) c) Floodplain Evaluation (HDR): HDR will develop two proposed conditions models. One model will represent a trail concept with the trail mostly aligned with the roadway and no pedestrian bridges. The second model will represent a trail concept with the trail mostly aligned with the creek and up to three pedestrian bridges. Each of the two proposed conditions models will be run with up to three iterations each in coordination with GW to minimize water surface elevation impacts. HDR will develop a brief TM up to 3 pages long documenting the data sources, methodology, and results. d) ROW and Property Ownership Evaluation (ELS) e) Structural Evaluation (KPFF S) fl User Experience (GW) 3.4 ODOT Rail Coordination Meeting#1 (GW,KPFF-C). KPFF will provide advice on rail crossing criteria and reaching out to ODOT to begin preliminary conversations and get feedback to understand the feasibility, cost, and issues related to getting approval for the crossings. KPFF will initiate a meeting with ODOT Rail at this phase to let them know what is intended, and identify limitations, challenges, and opportunities for the trail alignment alternatives. • Client Meeting#4: Review Alternatives, Costs,and Technical Evaluations (GW) 3.5 Prepare Graphics for PAC.TAC. and Public Meetings (QZ Consultant will prepare graphic exhibits that include illustrative plans of the three trail alignments to best illustrate the design options and facilitate conversations with the stakeholders and the public.The trail alignments will be broken up into three to four segments/sheets to illustrate the alternatives at legible scales. 3.6 PAC and TAC Meeting#2 (GW,PHS). Consultant and PHS will attend PAC and TAC meetings to review and discuss the trail alignment alternatives. Consultant will assume these meetings will be back to back on the same afternoon to maximize efficiency. 3.7 Public Meeting#2 (GWS Consultant will attend Public meeting#2 to help present the trail alignment alternatives to the public. It is assumed Tigard will reserve the room and arrange notices and provide a means for assimilating public comments. 3.8 Assess Public Input GWS Consultant will:review and assess the public feedback provided by Tigard. 2019 PrSA—Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita to Tualatin 16 1 Page • Client Meeting#5: Review Public Input and Discuss Next Steps (GW) TASK 2 DELIZ'ERABLES: Three Trail Alignment Alternatives Illustrations: One overall plan at 200 scale and 4 sheets of trail segments at 60 scale,Technical Evaluations Memo of Alternatives,Design Criteria Matrix, Cost Estimates for each Trail Alignment,public meeting graphics. Task 4: Preferred Trail Alignment and Project Scoping After reviewing feedback from the Alternatives Analysis phase, consultant will prepare a Preferred Trail alignment to a 10% level, cost estimate, and refine the technical evaluation. Consultant will meet with the City's Project Manager to review the final alignment and then begin assisting with project scoping documents for fund raising efforts that would fund design and construction of the trail. Subtask 4.1 10% Design of Preferred Trail Alignment (G114 Prepare a Preferred Trail alignment to a 10%level based on feedback from the Client, Stakeholders, and Community. The 10% package will include the location of the preferred trail in plan at a legible scale. Consultant will include plan enlargements at the street crossings at Bonita and Durham Road. The plans will highlight areas of wetland and vegetated corridor impacts,boardwalks,and bridges and creek crossings. 4.2 Cost Estimate of Preferred Trail Alignment(GW,KPFF-C,KPFF-a KPFF will update the cost estimate based on the preferred trail alignment. 4.3 Refine Technical Evaluation of Preferred Trail Alignment Consultant will refine the train evaluation based on the preferred alignment. It is assumed that the scoring evaluations for the various alignments from task 3.3 provided by the design team will carry over and not require subconsultants input. • Client Meeting#6: Review 10%Design, Costs,and Technical Evaluations (GW, KPFF-C) 4.4 ODOT Rail Meeting#2 (GW_KPFF), KPFF will initiate a second meeting with ODOT Rail to present the preferred trail alignment and get feedback from ODOT rail for the next steps to gain approval in the design process. 4.5 Assist with Project Scoping Documents for Final Design (GW,KPFF-C, KPFF-S� The Design Team will assist the City prepare exhibits and narratives and help complete a project persecutes that can be submitted to ODOT as a grant application. Consultant will prepare graphic exhibits,KPFF will assist with completing the application. 4.6 Assist with Comprehensive Plan Amendment(GW) Prepare a narrative and compile illustrations to submit to the City of Tigard to help with Comprehensive Plan Amendment process that will allow for the trail alignment within a delineated wetland. TASK 4 DELD ERABLES: 10% Design Package for Preferred Trail Alignment: 1- Overall Site Plan at 200 scale, 4- Site Plans of Trail Segments (at 60 scale),Typical Trail Sections, Enlargements at Street Crossings (20 scale),Cut Sheets and Images for Bridge and Boardwalks,Project Narrative,Technical Evaluation of Trail Alignment,Cost Estimate,Project Scoping Documents. ASSUMPTIONS 1. Site topographic survey is not available, consultantwill utilize GIS information as well as aerial photography,and wetland determination GIS data to prepare working bases for this project.The next phase of design will require a formal topographic survey which is not part of this contract. 2019 PrSA—Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita to Tualatin 17 1 i a g 2. Geotechnical Engineering is not part of this scope of work.Consultantwill utilize existing geotechnical studies from adjacent Fanno Creek trail projects as a basis for structural assumptions.The next phase of design will require a formal Geotechnical Investigation at bridge and boardwalk locations which is not part of this contract. 3. The delineation of the Fanno Creek and wetlands within the project boundary will be attained through a combination of digitizing aerial photography and collecting GIS points in the field. The Vegetated Corridor will be offset from these planning level boundaries.The next phase of design,will require a formal wetland delineation which is not part of this contract. 4. Tree inventory and/or assessments or work performed by a consulting arborist is not included in this proposal. 5. The base cost of services assumes preliminary hydraulic modeling for three bridges. If modeling is required for additional pedestrian bridges,additional fees will be required. 2019 PrSA—Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita to Tualatin 18 1 a n e EXHIBIT 2 CONSULTANTS PROPOSAL 2019 PrSA—Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study Bonita to Tualatin 19 CITY OF TIGARD FAN NO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT STUDY Wi BONITA ROAD TO sx j TUALATIN RIVER Submitted 11-8-18 t GreenWorks KPFF Pacific Habitat Services HDR . Global Transportation Engineering , Epic Land Solutions Stratoscape ,, h� , , 9„ :,i ► C Oilf y�al! �g9i i � wl jw.p.,• asa?lII�G ._.+ U ^o ...a r`E 'a .Rs. 4 , ORKS Contact:Mike Faha,Principle In Charge 1 24 NW 2nd Ave.Suite 100,Portland,OR 97209 1 p.503-222-5612 1 f.503.222.2283 1 mikef@greenworkspc.com November 8, 2018 GREEn Attention: Joe Barrett, Principal Management Analyst City of Tigard - Contracts & Purchasing Office 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Proposal - Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study, Bonita Road to Tigard River Dear Mr. Barrett and Members of the Selection Committee, The GreenWorks team is excited to submit a proposal for the City of Tigard's Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study, Bonita Road to Tigard River.Trails are important public spaces that enhance the culture and community spirit of a city, provide people with transportation and exercise routes, as well as a place to connect with and experience nature. This project offers us the opportunity to provide the crucial final link in the Fanno Creek Trail and achieve multiple benefits across the Tigard community through data collection, developing a preferred alignment, estimating costs, and documenting key decisions and next steps.This project will be complex, involving coordination with ODOT rail, CWS, impacts for future grant funding, impacts to habitat, potential flood effects, challenging construction parameters, and complicated property -TAT r. interests. r GreenWorks is a Landscape Architectural and Environmental Planning firm with expertise in trail planning and design (including bridge projects for pedestrian, bicycles, and vehicles), project management, public involvement, riverfront design, and habitat enhancements. We are team players and work well with clients,the public, stakeholder groups, engineers, and other professionals.With our team of experts,we will bring a depth of knowledge, understanding and passion to this project that no other team has. Our designs for this project will be holistic, addressing transportation, Jw recreational, neighborhood, habitat, cultural and permitting requirements. We greatly appreciate the opportunity to demonstrate to the City of Tigard and other project stakeholders why the GreenWorks project team is the most qualified to assist with this project. We have assembled a multi-disciplinary team to support this project.As a team,we have a shared body of work that is highlighted in our qualifications.We bring unique expertise together to ensure that the specific needs of your project are met. Because of our current working relationships and history of working together, we can provide services while efficiently remaining within the budget and schedule of this project. Our team organization is as follows: GreenWorks: Prime, Landscape Architect KPFF: Civil, Survey, Structural, Cost Estimating, ODOT Rail Coordination Pacific Habitat Solutions: Natural Resources Global Transportation Engineering: Transportation Engineering HDR: Hydrology& Hydraulics Epic Land Solutions: Right of Way Stratoscape: Drone Technology Ben Johnson will serve as Project Manager and I, Mike Faha (license# LA242 OR), will serve as Principal in Charge and the Landscape Architect of Record on this project. As the two principals of the firm, Gill Williams and I are authorized to represent our firm in any negotiations and to sign contracts. Please contact me with any questions. All addenda are acknowledged and no redactions are requested. GreenWorks and our team of sub-consultants are collectively able to address and perform all work as outlined in the Scope of Work for the Fanno Creek Trail Alignment between January and September 2019, as stated in the RFP.This proposal is valid for 90 days. Sincerely, Mike Faha, PLA, FASLA, LEED AP 71 Principal Landscape Architect, GreenWorks, PC (503) 222-5612 mikef@greenworkspc.com © THIS PROPOSAL IS PRINTED ON 100%POST-CONSUMER CONTENT RECYCLED PAPER,MANUFACTURED IN THE U.S.A.USING WIND POWER.PLEASE RECYCLE. GreenWorks, PC • Landscape Architecture Environmental Design 24 NW 2nd Avenue, Suite 100 • Portland, Oregon 97209 • p. 503.222.5612 • f. 503.222.2283 greenworkspc.com PROJECT APPROACH & UNDERSTANDING - rte"' •`- �F' J _ TABLE OF CONTENTS �� to hit the ground running, executing independently checked by engineers UNDERSTANDING the project scope thoroughly and not directly involved with their 1. Project Approach and Understanding........................................................................1 efficiently to meet all goals and preparation. Regional trails are a vital piece of deliverables. A typical construction cost our local transportation systems For all of these reasons, our team is estimating procedure includes the 2. Consultant Team Organization and Team Qualifications........................................8 that have the power to enhance the excited to continue our work on the following steps: livability of our communities. Trails next phase of this project. not only provide active recreation Our approach to this trail alignment In-house design staff develop 3. Consultant Team Experience with Similar Projects ..............................................10 for walkers,joggers, and cyclists, but study will balance constructability quantity take-offs. An also serve as a safe byway for bike and costs,minimize environmental independent check of the commuters and essential pedestrian impacts,and facilitate a positive user quantities will be made and links. When complete,this project experience within the natural and differences resolved. 4. Project Management..................................................................................................14 will fill a crucial gap along the 15- urban settings. Check for recent projects mile Fanno Creek Greenway(FCG), that are similar in scope and facilitating safe and contiguous Balance Constructability and Costs size. Examine bid tabs for the Appendix........................................................................................................................... 16 active transportation options It will be important for this project current market rate of unit and recreational and educational to establish a reliable cost estimate. prices and adjust as needed so opportunities for the community of KPFF Civil will take the lead on that they apply specifically to Tigard and our entire region. costing the alternative trail alignments our project. The GreenWorks Team has planned and final trail alignment with and designed on-street and off-street assistance from all team disciplines. Minimize Environmental Impacts trails in a variety of natural, historic, Cost estimating includes generating The majority of design decisions and urban settings including the unit prices for pay items based related to trail alignment options recently completed Fanno Creek on available bid tabulations from will likely be related to minimizing Reameander Project in downtown previous projects of our own, as trail impacts on the existing natural Tigard for Clean Water Services—a well as using our team member's environment. During this study the quarter-mile segment and creek vast project experience to inform GreenWorks Team will develop crossing along the FCG in a sensitive unit prices for our estimates. KPFF alternative trail alignments that environment that is similar to this maintains a database of bid results compare impacts to wetlands and study. We are also currently working from their projects to ensure they vegetated corridors. The ultimate on the four segments of the regional have access to current prices in goal will be to plan and design a trail through an ODOT contract,two relation to projects whose scopes we feasible alignment option that will of those trail segments are on either fully understand. minimize wetland impacts with the end of this project:Tigard Library to future construction of the trail. To Milton Court segment and the 85th Cost data tables are used along ensure this goal can be achieved, Avenue to Ki-a-kuts Bridge segment. with discussions with industry it will be necessary to know where Each of these projects, along with contacts to ensure that estimates are wetlands are located. Existing our extensive trail and environmental accurate and up to date. Estimates mapping shows approximate wetland experience, give our team the ability are updated at each submittal and boundaries, but we believe that the Fanno Creek Alignment Project/City of Tigard 1 PROJECT APPROACH & UNDERSTANDING PROJECT APPROACH & UNDERSTANDING boundaries are not accurate enough for our planning purposes. In lieu of a wetland delineation,which can be J �c conducted in a later phase, Pacific Habitat Services will conduct a wetland determination.The differences f x g between the two is that wetland ` boundaries are flagged and surveyed v with a wetland delineation. A wetland determination still consists of field 4` �. :r•; work, but no wetland boundaries are flagged and the only survey consistsr -- of GPS data collected sparsely along ` { the boundaries to increase the accuracy of the work. The wetland determination boundaries, with the appropriate " `� t , width of Clean Water Services' vegetated corridors, will be , transferred to the base map that Floodplain Analysis Right of Ways and Street Crossings 9Y ^' is used to plan the trail's alignment From our past experience working Part of this study will assess trail options.The increased accuracy on multiple trail segments of the alignment options that could be within gained by conducting a wetland Fanno Creek Greenway, we realize the Right of Way including on or land use, topography, traffic control and out to ODOT to begin preliminary determination will ensure the overall much of the trail will likely occur within adjacent to roads and street crossings. signage, proposed crossing treatments, conversations and get feedback toti accuracy of the project's success. the 100-year floodplain. One of the The project limits currently identifies and recommendations. GTEng will follow understand the feasibility, cost, and a° project requirements and planning at least one segment within the Right the National Cooperative Highway issues related to getting approval for the Facilitate a Positive User Experience considerations will be flooding impacts of Way—Milton Court—and two street Research Program (NCHRP) Report crossings. o User experience is how a user on trails, as well as compliance with the crossings—one at Bonita Road and 562,the Manual on Uniform Traffic experiences and is impacted by local floodplain regulations and Federal another at Durham Road.The trail Control Devices (MUTCD), and the Geotechnical &Structural the trail and its surroundings. A Emergency Management Agency alignment after crossing SW Bonita Road City of Tigard Standards.While there Understanding positive user experience is one (FEMA) requirements. Our approach crossing could have a couple potential is currently no pedestrian crossing Our team has a thorough << where the biker or pedestrian feels is to use previous work to develop an alignment options which include the treatments at Durham Road, there understanding of the geotechnical issues - joy,wonder, and a sense of escape efficient and targeted hydraulic analysis following: are existing treatments at SW Bonita for this trail segment due to work on the in the landscape around them. Our to inform the alternatives analysis. Road that will be assessed to see if it is adjacent trail segments. KPFF Structural approach for designing trails for HDR will use existing HEC-RAS 1. Follow the top of bank of the adequate for a regional trail. Engineers are on the team in an advisor positive user experience is to balance models to compare proposed design creek heading towards Bonita capacity and will use all the findings from the practicalities of trail construction concepts to the existing condition. For Natural area along between the Design of the appropriate treatments the two recent projects (4 Segments INS with simple gestures that make the this planning level study, the work will commercial parking lot and top of for the alignment at street crossings and of the Fanno Creek Greenway and the trail feel like it was meant to be focus on the elements including trails, bank, in the Right of Ways will be based on the CWS Remeander project) as a baseline there without forcing a trail into the boardwalks and bridges that appear 2. Follow 76th Avenue on-street outcome of the analysis and will follow for the conditions along this segment of landscape. We incorporate long, to have the greatest effect on the south towards gentle woods and City of Tigard design standards. trail. These assumptions will be used to Community Support gentle curves and find special places floodway. then follow the creek, or establish costs for foundation design for It will be vital to engage and garner along the linear sites that allow users We will then hone in on the concepts, 3. Follow 74th Avenue south for Each of these options will have any bridges or boardwalks for costing support for this segment of the Fanno access to nature while minimally evaluating additional design elements approximately 300 feet to Bonita pros and cons from a constructability, purposes. If desired, we could bring on Creek Trail by involving the community impacting the surroundings. that support FEMA compliance and Natural Area where Ball Creek cost, environmental impact, and user a geotechnical engineer to do borings in the process. Building trust and Along with the trail alignment, a "no-rise" outcome.These design joins Fanno Creek. experience which will be evaluated in along the preferred alignment, but sharing project goals will result in other elements that improve user elements include grading features that the design criteria matrix. we believe that, given our experience positive outcomes for both the local experience include interpretive offset the hydraulic impacts of stream Global Transportation Engineering and potential impacts on the project neighborhood and broader community. signage, places to pull off the trail crossings and their associated fill (GTEng) is on the team to conduct a ODOT Rail Coordination schedule and budget, it is not necessary With our recent experience on the to rest and enjoy a view,welcoming volumes. Design ideas include floodplain pedestrian crossing analysis and design It is likely that a meeting or contact during this phase. ODOT Fanno Creek Trail project,we thresholds at trailheads, and excavation to increase flood storage for the street crossings and on-street with ODOT Rail will be necessary during Our team also has experience are a familiar face to the community and intentionally integrated art.All of culverts within approach fill areas, or segments to determine the appropriate the planning phase to let them know designing structures in the poor soils stakeholders.The GreenWorks team will these elements will elevate a basic boardwalk features. treatments for a pedestrian and bike what is intended, and identify limitations, underlying our recent Fanno Creek be there to help with presenting ideas trail to a memorable place that people These potential solutions can be crossings and on-street treatments.The challenges, and opportunities.The project.This will enable us to leverage and getting feedback during the process, want to return to. Positive user simulated in the existing model with pedestrian crossing analysis will include formal ODOT Rail Order process would existing information from numerous using visualization technology to prepare experience will result in more trail relatively little effort, and will allow the an evaluation of existing conditions, occur during preliminary and final design soil borings to develop estimated rich graphics (as seen above)that help users who support the goals of the design team and the City to present existing and future pedestrian and phases. John Schnaderbeck from KPFF foundations costs without a detailed lay-people understand and get excited City of Tigard in becoming a more stakeholders with viable alternatives and vehicle volumes, gap analysis, crash will be used specifically for ODOT geotechnical investigation. about complicated planning projects. walkable, bike-friendly community. realistic costs. analysis, illumination, sight distance, Rail coordination by providing advice on rail crossing criteria and reaching 2 GreenWorks Fanno Creek Alignment Project/City of Tigard 3 PROJECT APPROACH & UNDERSTANDING PROJECT APPROACH & UNDERSTANDING Task 1 Deliverables: Project Task 2 Subtasks SCOPE WORK Schedule, Meeting Agendas and 2.1 Technical Inventory and Notes, Monthly Invoices and Progress Analysis: Environmental, Hydraulic, TASK 1: PROJECT MANAGEMENT Reports Transportation, Structural, As outlined in the Project Geotechnical Management section of this proposal, Task 2: Existing Conditions we recognize successful project Inventory and Analysis 2.2 Aerial Drone Photographic Base 85th Ave to Ki-a-kuts Bridge a� delivery requires effective project Knowing the project site and Mapping 'A Length:+/_1,500 If 3 management that delivers the project conditions well,the GreenWorks - �- on time and on budget. GreenWorks Team will hit the ground running 2.3 Assemble Data and Prepare Base Alignment, Project Manager, Ben Johnson will to quickly collect technical data Map address the daily needs of the project and create a usable base map that including communication between will be used for the duration of 2.4 Prepare Preliminary Design the client and sub-consultant team. the project.The technical data will Criteria `r `` •� y. The Design Team including Civil and include but will not be limited to: Environmental consultant will attend a wetland determination, ROW 2.5 Prepare Existing Conditions and Street Crossing . ..� a site visit with City Staff and discuss and property ownership analysis, Analysis Diagrams - ` project goals and process. A detailed streets and intersection analysis, project schedule will be prepared in property ownership, and floodplain 2.6 Design Team Meeting#1: Review ?%yam ' Fanno Creek MS Project that will have dates for inventory, available survey data, and Findings and Design Criteria ' t - � tasks, milestones, and meetings. The GIS layers. We will use the technical ;; -� schedule will be updated as needed. data and prepare a Site Analysis/ 2.8 City Meeting#1: Review Analysis Regular Client meetings will occur Issues diagram. The Design Team Findings and Design Criteria . - with the Core Team and City's Project will prepare Design Criteria in a N. Manager,these meetings are shows matrix form that will be used to 2.9 Prepare Graphics for PAC,TAC, ��.• ; ' ._ in subsequent tasks to show where easily compare pros and cons of trail and Public Meetings they would occur during the process. alignment alternatives in subsequent ..,• Design Advisors in smaller roles will phases.The data will be compiled for 2.10 City Meeting#2. Review Public - Legend Street Crossing participate in some of the Design review by the City and Stakeholders, Meeting Materials Team Meetings. then refined for Technical Advisory --•--•• on Street Alignment Committee (TAC) and Public Advisory 2.11 PAC and TAC Meeting#1 --- off street Alignment `D• The following project management Committee (PAC) and Open House Existing Alignment Railroad a. subtasks will occur throughout the #1. GreenWorks will prepare high- 2.12 Public Meeting#1 Fanno Creek Tigard Library to duration of the project: quality, illustrative graphic exhibits Bonita Rd for the public meetings that will be 2.13 Assess Public Input Length:+/-3,000 If Task 1 Subtasks easy to understand and help gain , - - 1.1 Start-up Meeting with client(GW, excitement for the project. 2.14 City Meeting#3: Review Public KPFF, PHS) Input and Discuss Next Steps Task 2 Deliverables: Base Map in the team will calculate wetland and 3.2 Prepare Draft Costs for Trail GIS and available City Files,Aerial buffer impacts, analyze floodplain Alignments 1.2 Project Start up: Contracts and r Photography, Existing Conditions impacts, and initiate conversations File Organization Plan Graphic, Opportunities and with ODOT Rail. The Design Team 3.3 Design Team Meeting#2: Review Constrains Diagrams, Design Criteria will use the Design Criteria to Trail Alignments 1.3 Prepare and Refine Project Matrix, Refined Public Meeting score and compare pros and cons Schedule y Graphics of trail alignment alternatives.The 3.4 Prepare Technical Evaluations alternatives will be reviewed by the of Trail Alternatives: Costs, Impacts, 1.4 Client Meetings - 6 (Listed below `Z. TASK 3: ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS City and Stakeholders,then refined Floodplain, User Experience in following tasks) Once feedback is collected from for Technical Advisory Committee the Inventory and Analysis phase, (TAC) and Public Advisory Committee 3.5 Design Criteria Score 1.5 Design Team Meetings (Listed we will prepare two (2) preliminary (PAC) and Open House #2. PAC below in following tasks) trail alignments and cost estimates. and TAC Meeting#2 could be a 3.6 City Meeting#4: Review We will have the technical design walking workshop of each potential Alternatives, Costs, and Technical 1.6 Prepare Monthly Invoices and team members provide a technical trail alignment. We will meet with Evaluations Progress Reports evaluation of the trail alternatives the City Project Manager to review related to their respected disciplines stakeholder and public input and 3.7 Prepare Graphics for PAC,TAC, 1.7 Project Coordination with Client and help score the design criteria discuss next steps. and Public Meetings and Design Team along with offer suggestions for improving aspects of the alternatives. Task 3 Subtasks 3.8 PAC and TAC Meeting#2 After any refinements are made, 3.1 Prepare Preliminary Trail Alignments 4 GreenWorks Fanno Creek Alignment Project/City of Tigard 5 PROJECT APPROACH & UNDERSTANDING PROJECT APPROACH & UNDERSTANDING FANNO CREEK TRAIL SCHEDULE JAN-19 FEB-19 MAR-19 APR-19 MAY-19 JUN-19 JULY-19 9 3.9 Public Meeting#2 Task 4 Subtasks k 2:PROJECT MANAGEM Tas • 4.1 Prepare 10% Design of Preferred 3.10 City Meeting#5: Review Public Trail Alignment i� Project Meetings&Coordination Input and Discuss Next Steps 4.2Prepare Cost of Preferred Trail k 2:DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS • \. Task 2 Deliverables:Two Trail Alignment 2.1 2Kickoff Meeting and Site Visit Alignment Alternatives Illustrations, Technical Evaluations Memo of 4.3 Refine Technical Evaluation of .1 Technical Inventory and Analysis Alternatives, Design Criteria Matrix - Preferred Trail Alignment Aerial Drone Photographic Base Scored, Cost Estimates for each Trail 2.2 Mapping • Client Meeting Alignment, public meeting graphics. 4.4 City Meeting#6: Review 2.3 Assemble Data and Prepare Base Map ?' 10% Design, Costs, and Technical O PAC/TAC Meeting TASK 4: PREFERRED TRAIL Evaluations 2.4 Prepare Preliminary Design Criteria ALIGNMENT AND PROJECT Prepare Existing Conditions and s7E; Public Meetings SCOPING 4.5 Assist with Project Scoping 2.5 Analysis Diagrams ____1111____ After reviewing feedback from the Documents for Final Design 2.6 Design Team Meeting#1:Review H Duration Alternatives Analysis phase,we will Findings and Design Criteria prepare a Preferred Trail alignment 4.6 City Meeting#6: Interim Project 27 City Meeting#1:Review Analysis rte' Findings and Design Criteria to a 10% level, cost estimate, and Scoping Meeting(if necessary) 2.8 Prepare Graphics for PAC,TAC,and x t .- refine the technical evaluation. We Public Meetings j�,+u1 will meet with the City's Project Task 4 Deliverables: 10% Design2 9 City Meeting#2:Review Public Meeting _ Manager to review the final alignment Package for Preferred Trail Alignment: Materials and then begin assisting with project Site Plan,Typical Trail Sections, 2.1 PAC and TAC Meeting#1 scoping documents for fund raising Enlargements at Street Crossings, efforts that would fund design and Cut Sheets and Images for Bridge 2.11 Public Meeting#1 construction of the trail. and Boardwalks, Project Narrative, 2.12 Assess Public Input Technical Evaluation of Trail Alignment, Cost Estimate 213 City Meeting#3:Review Public Input and Discuss Next Steps Task 3:AL 3.1 Prepare Preliminary Trail Alignments is 1 v 3.2 Prepare Draft Costs for Trail Alignments 3.3 Design Team Meeting#2:Review Trail Alignments R 3.4 Technical Evaluations of Trail Alternatives t 3.5 Design Criteria Score 3.6 City Meeting#4: Review Alternatives 3.7 Prepare Graphics for PAC,TAC,and Public Meetings 3.8 PAC and TAC Meeting#2 3.9 Public Meeting#2 � J 3.10 City Meeting#5:Review Public Input and Discuss Next Steps {`�r • . Prepare 10%Design of Preferred Trail 4.1 Alignment 4.2 Prepare Cost of Preferred Trail Alignment y 4.3 Refine Technical Evaluation of Preferred Trail Alignment �- 4.4 City Meeting#6: Review 10%Designs 4.5 Assist with Project Scoping 4.6 City Meeting#6:Interim Project Scoping Meeting IT, 6 GreenWorks Fanno Creek Alignment Project/City of Tigard 7 TEAM ORGANIZATION & QUALIFICATIONS Key Staff Roles, . Value Projects - Public Stakeholders City of Tigard 'F Note: table ff ponly. ll oall staff arelocatedin theappendiNm -, Mike Faha, PLA, FASLA, LEED AP; Principal in Charge; 5%of Work Fanno Creek Remeander,Tigard,OR,CWS " KPFF GreenWorks Mike is a Professional Landscape Architect and founding Principal Mike served as Landscape Architecture Principal when CIVIL ISTRUCTURAL ICOST I ' PRIME Pacific Habitat of GreenWorks.With over 30 years of experience leading planning GreenWorks has hired by CWS on a multi-disciplinary ODOT RAIL COORDINATION Mike Faha • �, NATURAL RESOURCES and design projects, Mike has worked on numerous associated Fanno team led by HDR to restore a segment of Fanno Creek Principal-In-Charge Curt Vanderzanden John Van Staveren• Creek projects including Fanno Creek Trail (ODOT), Fanno Creek and improve the Fanno Creek Trail in downtown Tigard. Ben Johnson • Civil Prinrip al Environmental Project Manager Remeander(CWS), and Greenspace Planning/ Fanno Creek Greenway, Paul Dedyo • Shawn Eisner (Metro). Project Manager b Civil Project Manager , Environmental Ficld Work Manager R Matthew Crampton -, Stuart Finney fob captain �' __ Ben Johnson, PLA,CPSI; Project Manager; 30%of Work Fanno Creek Remeander,Tigard,OR,CWS '` r� ' c, structural Engineer ` Key Staff: Ben Johnson led previous master plan work on the Ash Avenue to Hall Ben collaborated closely with HDR on the Fanno Creek Kelly Stoecklein Boulevard section of this project, the CWS Fanno Remeander project, Remeander, serving as Landscape Architect and Trail John Schnaderbeck Project Support '` OR M/W/D/ESB: and the Fanno Creek Trail with City of Tigard/ODOT. He offers 19 Planner as GreenWorks provided trail design for a quarter ODOT Rail Coordination years of experience managing complicated trail and parks projects mile segment of the 15-mile regional trail that extends . � n,. around the Pacific Northwest and has a strong relationship with the from Tualatin to Portland through Tigard. In City of Tigard and our sub-consultants. Global s HDEpic Stratoscape TRANSPORTATION DRONETECHNOLOGYoh, HYDROLLand Solutions Paul Dedyo,PE,Civil Project Manager; 15%of Work Fanno Creek Trail,Tigard,OR,City of Tigard/ODOT ENGINEERING RIGHT OF WAY CasePaul Woerrley Overcamp Paul Ded o will lead the civil en ineerin desi n includin trail Paul is servin as Civil Pro ect Mana er in su ort for the Y g g g g g j g ppMonica Teresa Leal H&H LeadDave Nickerson • Drone Pilot +�► , alignment review that considers site grading and trail profile, design and permitting of 4 segments of the Fanno Creek s `yFyi4;j Traffic Engineer Cory Gieseke Right of Way lead stormwater management, utility conflicts, and available right of way. Trail in Tigard, OR. Trail design includes about 1.7 miles of Dana Beckwith H&H Modeler With 27 ears of experience, Paul has provided planning and design new trail to be designed and constructed in accordance 3 Y p p p g g g Traffic Engineer for many local and regional parks and trails, including the recent multi- with regional, state and national standards. use Red Electric Trail and Pedestrian Bridge, and as project manager GreenWorks, Prime Global Transportation Engineering, Tran Eng for our current work on the Fanno Creek Trail. GreenWorks has acted as a regional leader in sustainable design Global Transportation Engineering(GTEng) is a Portland John Van Stavern, Environmental Project Manager; 10%of Work Crescent Connection:Cedar Hills Boulevard-Denney and environmental planning since 1987. We bring together Oregon-based MBE-certified consulting firm specializing in John has 30 years of experience (25 of which he's worked in Tigard) Road, Beaverton,OR,City of Beaverton/ODOT teams of specialized sub-consultants to achieve our clients' transportation engineering and planning services. GTEng will and has managed hundreds of permitting and compliance projects, John is managing the environmental consulting services visions. Building on our experience with previous phases of this lend its 38 years of planning and designing trails and traffic wetland and riparian mitigation projects and endangered species for the Crescent Connection Trail in Beaverton. PHS project, and utilizing our expertise managing complex parks & infrastructure, and their experience working on previous assessments for ODOT and numerous local agencies. He is an expert conducted a wetland delineation and a natural resources trails projects, GreenWorks will be the primary POC, provide segments of Fanno Creek. in federal, state, and local environmental regulations,the Endangered assessment and has prepared an application for the Corps project management, support the City's public involvement Species Act, NEPA compliance,wetland mitigation,wildlife habitat of Engineers and the Department of State Lands. with graphics and innovative communications, and develop HDR Engineering, Hydrology & Hydraulics assessments and water quality assessments. alternatives and scoping documents. With 230 staff in Oregon, HDR's offices have 8 staff with Paul Woerrlein,Utility Relocation&Fish Passage;5%of Work Fanno Creek Enhancement,Ash to Main,Tigard,OR experience in hydraulic and hydrologic modeling and support y g g KPFF Engineering, Civil I Structural I Cost from 20 individuals in the PNW to assist if the need for specialty Paul has a wealth of skills in water resources engineering including HDR provided hydraulic analysis and design services KPFF has extensive experience in master planning and design services arise. Our experience includes a variety of hydrology hydraulic and hydrologic modeling using HEC-RAS (including 2D), the remeander of a previously straightened reach and for trails and parks throughout the region. With an in-depth and hydraulic modeling(e.g., HEC-RAS, SWMM, HEC-HMS, HEC-HMS and SWMM. He has completed floodplain analyses stabilization of several highly eroding banks to improve understanding of the Fanno Creek corridor, KPFF provided civil CivilStorm, etc) and FEMA regulatory support. for small creeks such as Fanno Creek and large rivers such as the channel function,floodplain connectivity, and aquatic and structural engineering services on a half-mile link of the Columbia River. Other hydraulic analyses include HEC-RAS modeling habitat. Paul led the hydraulic analysis for no-rise for two 15-mile trail, and the current design effort on four trail segments Epic Land Solutions, Right of Way of the headwaters of Bethany Creek and a dam breach analysis on the design iterations of the project. totaling 1.75 miles, including stormwater strategies, permit Western Tributary of Abbey Creek. design, and erosion and sediment control. KPFF helped develop Epic is an OR ESB-certified right of way and real property Fanno Creek Park master plan now being realized with the consulting services firm. Our team is advised by a former Monica Teresa Leal,Traffic Engineer;5%of Work Trolley Trail Final Design,Clackamas County,OR* the theander project. KPFF and GreenWorks have worked on over Washington County Right of Way Supervisor/ODOT Region Monica has 16 years of experience and has done extensive work on Monica prepared the PS&E for final bikeway design and reme1 Supervisor who has completed 3 projects with the City of public contracts that involve traffic analysis, pedestrian studies, and traffic engineering services for the new pedestrian and 20 projects over the past decade. y p g g Tigard. Epic will ensure compliance with local, state, and federal the design of pedestrian and bicycle facilities including Trolley Trail bike trail, a separated path with 16 roadway crossings, Pacific Habitat, Natural Resources right of way protocols due to our in-depth knowledge of ODOT Final Design and NW Lovejoy Street at 119th Avenue Crossing. a median running path, bike boulevard treatments, and and local agency guidelines. Epic has an excellent working bikeway markings on shared low-volume roadways. Pacific Habitat Services (PHS)will lead the environmental relationship with the City and a strong grasp of its procedures. permitting for the project.They have an excellent reputation Dave Nickerson, Right of Way Lead,5%of Work Reed's Crossing,City of Hillsboro,OR with state, federal, and local permitting projects.They are also Stratoscape, Drone Technology Dave has over 10 years of experience throughout the state of Oregon Epic provided acquisition services in support of the uniquely qualified as they are providing this same role for the Stratoscape in real estate. He has exhibited exemplary moral and ethical standards Cornelius Pass Road extension.This project will provide technology to Woodard Park -Bonita Road/85th Avenue trail section. PHS available on the project to use acapture high resolution base maps,ps, (Drone)photos, videos, through his membership in the Masters Circle Club of Portland. He has significant relief for the congestion and safety problems has worked in the Tigard area for the past 25 years and has worked with the City of Tigard on the SW Wall Street Improvements at the intersection of 209th and Tualatin Valley Highway. conducted many projects in the vicinity of the proposed trail data are useful for mamodels and Lir ma data for project areas.These images and and has also worked on the high-profile Reeds Crossing project for Additionally, it will accommodate future well-planned and section. dany purposes including comprehensive Washington County. higher-density mixed-use development. understanding of project area, providing visuals for community 8 GreenWorks Outreach, and exhibits for project reports/documentation. *Experience Prior to Current Firm Fanno Creek Alignment Project/City of Tigard 9 CONSULTANT TEAM PROJECT EXPERIENCE CONSULTANT TEAM PROJECT EXPERIENCE KO � n - U) = � CJnn � � � ZC) � Z � -P, -n 70 _n rD 3 rD O i J CD v o (D � v v C v 1. Fanno Creek Trail Projects � � ° Ert � � � � � � v � � � v QO � v Q � � � � � CD (D CD G CD < r < n Oq In (D — CD 0 7 r r rt 7 Oq CD 7 t C� O o < � C v N CD � 2 Q (D D h CD n m o o v o FANNO CREEK TRAIL:4SEGMENTS — o 0) n v' n � o rt o- v' CD v ((D Q v n n Q n (D Q 7 0 (D cf) CD O `�° 7 0 O (D v (D r7-r (D ((D N v v F' (D n (D (D _ Z � Bsm ave ro CD v Ln v — CO n � of � � r. � � CD r-r CD � � — � v N � v u, � � � H--k e,age (n C Ln CD r-r (D rt —• D Tigard,OR City of Tigard/ODOT Ongoing v Q (D o (D pIn v v 77 (D < n fD v '�Oq CD 77 — KPFF is leading a multidisciplinary team including GreenWorks, Pacific < Habitat Services, Global Transportation Engineering, and Epic Land n n n O n K n n O C? n O c o sr O n O D n ,. r W r 0 G 0 G G v G G Solutions in the design and permitting of 4 segments of the Fanno CD 0'< — (n (D h v rr r P d < O7 O O < v O O ` N Ae O O O O O CDO OCreek Trail in Tigard, OR through a Local Agency Liaison contract v -n O o o (D U) � 7 \ with ODOT.The alignment passes through natural areas and will r'' 0 -:1o M CD --1 ao �. O o0 7 n, = M cra on O — O QI v n n;to trigger wetland mitigation as well as vegetated corridor mitigation n v < Q B to RA v Q QQ Q through CWS.The evaluation of trail alignments included criteria Q v v _ 31°m ° ° such as cost, environmental impact, and user experience. Trail design CD •. � _ : . avenue includes about 1.7 miles of new shared-use path to be designed and " 0 CD a (D 0 N � _ -0 0 v � � v N O O O _6• n n Q v vCD v v v O n (�D CSD constructed in accordance with regional, state and national standards. o =3 � � E � <. � <. � <. E; (D � (D n m (D m (D m � � — � � � � R.°E wFTLAN° _ _ _ _ _ aRAR° i` Team: KPFF, GreenWorks, Pacific Habitat Services, HDR, Global -0 0 v v v o 0 0 0 0 v o 0 77 77 77 717 717 77 P°TFNTA1 Transportation Engineering, Epic Land Solutions SPORTS FIELDSuTURF ON- RAIL Rna rt r-r rt rt REST—T VEGETATED C°PPIDOR WCHE WALL ST - RAILFE5T5F°T Key Staff: Paul Dedyo, Curt Vanderzanden, Mike Faha, Ben Johnson, O O N N N O O N O N N N O N O O fr John Van Stavern, Shawn Eisner, Monica Leal, Dave Nickerson o o 01 � o o 0 o � o o 0 0 0 as (n7 on cra onTRAIL aq as an `TSP°T Reference: Mike McCarthy,Traffic Engineer, City of Tigard O ` � � r- � 0 („ �„ �„ - m v n o < v n < r Ln < wTLLRLLN H 503-718-2462, mikem@tigard-or.gov < = O v < v v v (D' c CD (D 77 � � c v v � c ( v o v oo z < < < � O < O < o -n a (� O D G ao of RAILREA° FANNO CREEK REMEANDER/ENHANCEMENTS � r (D m m m CD o Q N v °' N C < v CD -- ; v CD T, in v� vi v -< Q j v Q v = -< C<D � .� D CD v 7 rt rr 7 rt - O CD Q O CD rt Q O rt ` Q O OJ CD v N v CD p) (D n C 00 Z N O O Tigard,OR Clean Water Services Ongoing o CD (D v � v v (D 0' � c n < � HDR and GreenWorks were hired by Clean Water Services to v 0 7 =5 o �. restore a segment of Fanno Creek and improve the Fanno Creek — D Sys Trail in downtown Tigard.The team has been led by HDR whose o n cn n D = w v CD p (D CD CD r r (D v O P:Y v (D v v v v v v O n v n� responsibitlies, in addition to project management, include updating Q v —. —. _. n (D 0) _. Q - _ _ _. v the HEC-2 model to HEC-RAS; incorporating newly obtained survey �' rt ° g v o (D o v - - CD v v v v CD CD Ln !� . info; refinding the HEC-RAS model based on updated design; v < 7 7 7 o °� v v n N 7 N. providing no-rise certification using FEMA procedures; designing a CD - �' c� �' 7 � � 7 0 <p o p g g p g g cn 7 W CD Q rt rr Oq 07 OQ 0 < 7 v N new meandering channel and backwater area; designing fish passable Q0`0 N Q 0'Q CD 0) oo - culvert; replacing invasive vegetation with native plant communities; CD h and providing permit and construction support. GreenWorks' role n �• = cn. Q rt m n Q D < cn G cn G 6 — = n v m (D p v !D + rt U' > �. v (D n (D on the project is to provide trail design for a quarter mile segment of < v ao CD < o (D a < < < C m n' 7 < 7 (o o aq n LI). CD — v Q (D (D (D —• (D n Q v OQ, cn �. Ln C — N < <. Fanno Creek.The creek enhancements include restoring a previously ° s v oa rt rt _• v _�oq n n �,' h < N rt ;• = v CD v 7 (D (D W C W W• 7 v 7 v 7 v Z7 O rt CD v 7 O 7 C '< J) — =1 n straightened portion of the creek to a natural, meandering alignment Q o rt o N Q Q Q Q Q o N o' (D v g o 3 �, o that will improve hydrologic function of the creek and adjacent 7 M o n E:rp \ T, CD T CD v 7 rt — v 7 (D CD- Et.rt rt VCD 7 — CD — CD — Q v O W r-r v 017 < - ;G O r7-r (OD 7 floodplain.The Fanno Creek Trail improvements mimic the new o v o -a = Q = 0- ° O (D � p N �' 0 v 2 rt rt Oq v v 7 7i (7D v C <• (D CD (D CD N 7 — D_ L. CD nr (�D O _ Nr r — creek alignment to draw pedestrians and bikers further into the ark v O p- (D � �_ (D v - v - v M M (D CD v (D (o N o, �'• g p p 7 0 v v < O < (D 7 rt rt N _ v — — = v _ to experience the natural environment.The project also includesCD Q o o o o v v ° v CD �• v v Q replacing an old bridge that will be elevated to improve stream L^ Ln � (D (D - CD � - N o rt (D � ° 7 �- oUn 0- W n v 7 — O C7 n 7 v v OQ 7 (D O- r <n CD n rt v* r 6 Z 3 Z 3 Z �i D v U7 C v N Q n N O 3 A hydrology and maximize trail function for bikers using the Fanno v 7 (D rt rt rt rt �' 7 (D rt �' �. 7 (D rn < v Creek Trail. n = =' Ln < v v o v 5' '< _Q CD o a� < v m ° Q (D ° . f• rt Ln — — — OQ -0 3 �• O O n — v 7 O 7 _N CD v 7 CD n 7 CD cn CD v 20 W C7 C7 Z7 7 Ln O Oct -1, n Zr rt n O �.. 7 Oq O v' 7- (D (D (D CD O Q_ 7 -O Ot7 O Oq O p Team: HDR(prime), GreenWorks 0`o _J) � (D N U) � CO v n (D n (n - p Q -D 7 n 7 7 7 O O O rr (� v rr r r CD v rt v C C C N Et cttl' h <. (D < Q Z � O ) O cn � 7r n y N O 7 N �. 3 C O 7 rnr n ....... Key Staff: Paul Woerrlein, Ben Johnson, Mike Faha N v 0 (D (D �„ (D v ,� 7 . � 7 �' N 7 UQ --h SCJ T �. (D 3 rr Et (nn N < L' n '� �' p� r�-r 0, O O 0 < (D Q� (D 07 N N CD (D (D C = O C - — Reference: Matt Brennan, PE, Senior Water Resources Engineer, CD 7CD 7 (D n v (D N N V) Q N 7 n (D N N (D Clean Water Services, 503-681-3682, o o _ 3 D 0 7 rt v 7 O 7 7' Brennanm@cleanwaterservices.org — v (D (D °° v Q rt N n 7 rt 7r rt p M — 7 OQ O v 10 GreenWorks N ^F' Q CONSULTANT TEAM PROJECT EXPERIENCE CONSULTANT TEAM PROJECT EXPERIENCE 3. Graham Oaks Nature Park & _�— R° onqu n T i Trail it Wilsonville,OR I Metro 12010 GRDINARY GreenWorks provided project management, schematic design, HIGH WATER 4L � \ _ construction documents, and construction administration for this $1.4 million, 205 acre regional park.The Tonquin Trail winds its way through the site and provides regional access to the park,while ,vim — DAKOTA sr.R.o.w. _ — ;. \\ , ° secondary loop trails and forest hiking trails offeradditional scenic LENGTH OF TRAIL GE/STRPROX]°°" `�' •' routes.The integration of art and l environmental interpretation was LENGTH BRIDGE/STRUCTURE:APPROX 2]5' " � \' ' � g p LEGEND �;� 'EX ISTING DECIDUOUS an important design element to Graham Oaks.The project included (TREE.NP _ ,- `, v, e a gateway trail head with interpretive signage on the life and history PATH ON GRADE !. O BRIDGE/STRUCTURE I (EXISTING CONIFEROUS I GRAVEL \'\ <�Tj k q of the area as well as viewpoints, gathering laces bridges, and I c, p g g p g ..... EXTENDS EXTENTS OF FILL GRADING _ J� -�. /}+a, PARKING \\ �!/O boardwalks. ' RETAINING WALL r ri — + _ 7� — - Team:T m• � , GreenWorks (prime), KPFF —7 — B CpPIfOLHWV. _ Key Staff: Mike Faha, Curt Vanderzanden, Paul Dedyo BRIDGE ALTERNATIVE A-3 REOECEcrRicrRaa:sECMEnra 1 MeI' Reference: Rodney Wojtanik, RLA, Project Manager, Metro, 503-797- 1846, rod.wojtanik@oregonmetro.gov 2. Red Electric Trail 4. Gateway Green Portland,OR I ODOT& PBOT I Ongoing ` ;i11441.tv . !?- — r = Portland,OR I Portland Parks& Recreation Ongoing _ lip, a . KPFF is providing project management, structural and civil '' " Gateway Green is a 25-acre site located in East Portland at the engineering services for the final design of a new pedestrian =`� A ' confluence of two major freeways. GreenWorks is collaborating with bridge and trail in southwest Portland.Working with a number of partners and stakeholders to create a program and vision GreenWorks, who is providing design, environmental, right for Gateway Green.The park offers soft surface trails and paved of way, and construction engineering services for ODOT, the multi-use trails, and salvages existing on-site gravel for base rock to j project involves approximately 700 ft of new trail through build new gravel trails, and includes a diverse landscape scheme to steep terrain, heavy vegetation and an environmentally promote biodiversity and wildlife habitat and includes sustainable protected canyon. A new, 250 ft long curved pedestrian stormwater management—open vegetated swales and plantings to bridge forms a section of the winding trail alignment and slow and infiltrate stormwater. connects the on-grade sections of the alignment. Our team applied Crime Prevention Through EnvironmentalTeam: GreenWorks — Design principles to the design and location of the bridge, _ Key Staff: Ben Johnson, Kelly Stoecklein accommodating the need for clear sightlines onto the trail and bridge from an adjacent highway,without negatively ` Reference: Ross Swanson, Portland Parks& Recreation, 503-823- impacting the experience of the trail users. 3577, Ross.Swanson@portlandoregon.gov 3 When complete, the Red Electric Regional Trail will provide 5. Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge Pedestrian Bridge an important multi-modal link to other pedestrian and bicycle facilities in Southwest Portland.This off-street trail Ridgefield,WA I USF&W I Ongoing will connect residential areas with the Hillsdale Town Center - and other destinations in SW Portland, and provide a safe A team including GreenWorks and KPFF provided services on a pedestrian bridge in the Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge in alternative to bicycling and walking on SW Beaverton- Clark County,Washington.The structure provides the only pedestrian access over BNSF's three active tracks, allowing visitors Hillsdale Highway and SW Capitol Highway. to move safely from the park's entrance facilities into the Refuge's more natural wildlife viewing areas. KPFF provided civil i Team: KPFF (prime), GreenWorks engineering and GreenWorks supported the planning, design and the environmental requirements, as well as circulation design, - site planning and access design for the new bridge location and associated trails, trailheads, kiosks, and parking lots to meet ADA ^� Key Staff: Curt Vanderzanden, Paul Dedyo, Mike Faha, Ben requirements. Johnson Reference: Nicole Pierce, Capital Project Manager, Team: GreenWorks & KPFF City of Portland Department of Transportation, Key Staff: Mike Faha, Curt Vanderzanden 503-823-0396, nicole.peirce@portlandoregon.gov Reference: Mike Marxen, Chief of Visitor Services &Communications, 503-872-2700, mike_marxen@fws.gov 12 GreenWorks Fanno Creek Alignment Project/City of Tigard 13 PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROJECT MANAG EM ENT = Our Process Internal technical review for quality assurance and �� -cam. �- :y y �'� quality control " - GreenWorks is focused on quality and exceptional client Ben Johnson a. _ , ;�} ���r-� ;� � services. We believe this begins with strong leadership • Principal/senior review PROJECT MANAGERthat inspires confidence and promotes clear and consistent communication. GreenWorks implements the following Ben Johnson has worked as a Landscape Architect and „ r-:r "� R tf• management strategies to ensure work quality, exceed Team Structure Project Manager for over 19 years.With direct experience expectations, and ensure projects are completed on time and on Fanno Creek Remeander, Fanno Creek Trail (4 m - on budget. We recognize successful project delivery requires segments),and Fanno Creek Park Master Plan, Ben is effective project management strategy and team uniquely qualified to serve as our team's Project ManagerBLUFF OVERLOOKTRAILS& • Lead project manager will be the primary point of contact structure. We have assigned the role of Senior Project ANEMAHon the Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study project. W' throughout the course of the project Manager to Ben Johnson, a Senior Landscape Architect with working relationships with our entire design Ben has managed many complex parks and trails projects Newell Creek Canyon Day Use Area • Defined distinct project scope, phases, and tasks with team. Ben will handle the day-to-day coordination and has extensive project experience from conceptual identified milestones and deliverables and communication between the client and design design through construction. Ben will provide solutions that Metro GreenWorks(with KPFF) team and will be in charge of overseeing the design are sensitive to the environment, unique to the site, and • Clear goals set forth to the team with work sessions and and documentation to ensure the design is executed responsive to the City's needs, budget, and timeline. He Newell Creek Canyon is 233 acres of protected natural thoughtfully. Mike Faha will be Principal-in-Charge and will p Y g area in Oregon City and Clackamas County along Hwy 213. check-in meetings to keep work moving in a positive is adept at facilitating public meetings and presentations, trajectory provide leadership and guidance throughout the process. cost estimating, specification writing, construction detailing, Ben led the GreenWorks team hired by Metro to refine the This approach will ensure excellent design and project design, document, and permit a day use area and multi- planting and irrigation design, and producing graphic • Weekly internal project management meetings and regular management that will focus on the following: illustrations to conveydesign ideas. Ben brings creative and use trail system within the canyon. GreenWorks worked g g utilization analysis to ensure tasks are completed on time, Communication: Ben will facilitate proactive ro ressive public involvement approaches to the table with with Hart Crowser Geotechnical Engineers to assess the p g p pp requirements for improvements within the Geologic Hazard budget is tracked, and staff is available communication with team members and the City. a passion for meeting people where they are. Overlay Zone and Cascade Environmental for mitigating Ben is highly skilled at managing multi-disciplinary teams on impacts in the NROD and vegetated corridors of wetlands • Standardized plan review checklist(see a sample portion of Problem Solving: Unexpected issues arise as a part of projects similar in scope to the Fanno Creek Trail Alignment and streams.The team also includes KPFF Structural and the form below)specific to each project type with a 3-point every project.This makes problem solving a critical Civil and ms. hos as the Mt. Bike Advisor. review system that ensures stringent review from the part of the design process. Ben understands how to Study, including Gateway Green (PP&R), Canemah Bluff drafting, project management, and senior review/principal quickly define an issue, target multiple thoughtful Overlook and Trail (Metro), Spring Park Trail and Overlook, level design solutions, and find opportunities in the face of and Hogan Butte Trail. Ben is ideally suited to manage this IP OFF �m , PARKING challenges. project because he is an effective leader of interdisciplinary !RGENLYACCESS GREED I' teams and heossesses the necessary technical skills in KING STALLS(24) Settin Ex ectations: Mike Faha will rovide the p Y IMERBEAD �7 PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST g p p design, permitting and construction. He is experienced in YON OVERLOOK ,I � Name design team with clear expectations and priorities to working and communicating effectively with all of our sub- IYONTRAILHEAD g) 000000.0 carry out the City's mission for the project. NIC TABLE,TYP % ® ® consultants and is strongly positioned to lead our team to 4TNTYP % �� `'� ` '� In addition, Matt Crampton serve as Job Captain, assisting achieve excellent results. AYEL PATH % r_ •,. •�.i� 10 GN1„,�I� WORK COMPLETED BEDRCED GRASS - - � - '- r Task SR PM DR Action or Comments with all aspects of the project.As a Senior Landscape ' • • IING +F.I -���. .arEaxEn+„E\moi sca -� I—�.\\ 1 Codes,Guidelines and Client Coordination Ben s Project Experience 1 Comments from Client meetings have been addressed Architect with trail planning and construction experience, South Waterfront Greenway Park 2 Mee[in notesadded to ro'ec[no[ebook his substantial support will allow Ben to focus on the y 3 CommentsfromGWln-House meetings have been extensive project management tasks this project requires. Canemah Bluff Trails & Overlook Portland Parks& Recreation I KPFF addressed 4 In-House meetin 2_o11S added to ro'ect notebook Metro GreenWorks 5 Whebeenadress,commen[sfrommain[enancestaff Maintaining Key Staff have been addressed KPFF and Ben Johnson were on a team who provided bank 6 Maintenance staff recommendations and correspondence Canemah Bluff is a 300-acre natural area owned and stabilization and site utility design of the central district have been added to project notebook Like the City of Tigard, GreenWorks values and believes maintained by Metro within Oregon City.The project section of the Greenway. Key project elements include a Y AppropriLocal ate municipalcalcul have been met 8 Appropria[eworkshee[sandcalcula[ionshave been in the importance of maintaining key staff throughout the helped develop public access, which included improving shallow water habitat design, a vegetated retaining wall, and completed for corresponding jurisdiction and placed in the life of a project. ro ect notebook. p hiking &walking trails, which allowed visitors to gain access neighborhood river access while habitat restoration work 9 Designrequirements meet5tate,and Federal guidelines to the scenic overlook. During the Public Involvement proceeds. The project also includes extensive park facilities, Environmenalntswhere appropriate,includingADAand Project Manager Ben Johnson has an excellent working phase, Ben led GreenWorks in facilitating engagement with gradin native re-vegetation work, and support 0 Correspondence and research related to permitting and relationship with each of the key staff selected for this g, g pport for the design requirements are included in the project notebook the community to gain support from a highly active and acquisition of both State and Federal permits. project. He specifically chose team members who have 1 Project information worksheet has been completed first-hand experience with previous phases of work on interested neighborhood group. GreenWorks prepared p p designs that reflected both Metro's and the neighborhood's l; 44_ z Base5l,eets Fanno Creek Trail and have demonstrated a commitment goals for minimal impact while providing a safe lace for ;: -- 1 Correct ro'ecttitle to seeing this phase of the Fanno Creek Trail through to g p p g p 2 Correct sheet names users to enjoy the natural area. Graphic presentation — - 3 Pnofectsheetnssional mpbsaccurately shown ondrawing completion. With intentional, transparent, and consistent materials helped convey the design so both the client and 5 Name for Client,Developer,or Owner is correcty shown on communication, Ben will maintain relationships with each community could fully understand and appreciate what drawing E : .a° 6 General notes included where appropriate key staff person, ensuring that they understand their -.-. 7 Drawn,Approved,Checked Initials correct for each sheet responsibilites on the project. the end product would look like nestled into the natural Appropriatespecified submittallandsca e.The project was completed in 2016. 9 Revision delta/number a date 0 Correct scale notation and bar scale 1 Correct north arrow and orientation 14 GreenWorks SOUTH ER ONT GREENWAY PARK Fanno Creek Alignment Project/City of Tigard 15 � Sy i q a xm •.\ - a..�5•- pT ^^��.. .. '1 Iii � • , .y, t "z^'dS�}� i. I.Iz d.' �,�" y a-�:ai' .F �^.'S�. "?k --;�"`-..KM,;";wu d'4.'► �3�'� il►.s1;-. .q�, _ ,�ti. ��;,r �,,".p•. ��ld!' c� .w+' .r.':�r "` i1 t; " 'tiJ,az .b v �::,.� �. .,irev,i �TS'P'.we°'f�' {s- a7i#c`��"�&'i', .$s^?', -�E� !w' ' •i' IF f`sr► .: 'r+'' ',w, "�10a'°�\ .,a t1�r;` '�' G:d -f;, t ,«y�„ �� � ':y y ��.'� _ 4�'0,- �a ..4 sf.�� r �i►.. ..fw• LM .. _ } ���: '" .3F,3k''';?:�' a 1..t �i� { s./�:` •G f+��7�'�•y V�jfIr•�� .� ,, �` �...,�.r gra Y*� �,y�.: �`I��� ♦ V� 1. ¢ d^2Se... .__�.:' _.1,.,_ '!� `� '�', ,,. �_,r�.• •.a ��.�,� t, ^d��� w.l a' `r s ., '.�' .; •K� Y1 1t4 ..f y�Je_.,�tY=. r � ,�4a a as'`,?i _ sy'�® '. = � /!►�1tM�0`� b� r� 1 R �,:,x'+�� j���••g •'��� I MA -I®R" -- — .. ,y 1 s " ,e,ao, ^a- .X'-7a riy f- - RESUMES : . Additional Services & Information �- GENERAL SERVICES AVAILABLE In addition to the services outlined in this QBS Proposal, �r _ GreenWorks is able to provide GIS services, construction management and administration, construction drawings and specifications, wayfinding and interpretive design, regulatory permitting, and landscape monitoring. Our sub-consultant team is also available to provide additional _ services as needed. KPFF,for example, offers civil design, trail alignment, stormwater, utility coordination, project a �t management, and permitting. =' Trail Overlooks, Interpretive �ieq, , Signage, & Furnishings INTEGRATING TRAIL AMENITIES STUDY L t -4* GreenWorks has worked for local, state and federal agencies to ` '� :•�,;','...' s',•?.f } create interpretive elements, wayfinding signage, overlooks, and } - .. ' custom trail furnishings for trails and parks around the Pacific Northwest. In addition, our team has created over twenty a " t :P3t design guides and manuals for a variety of agencies, including Metro's Design Standards for Parks & Natural Areas.Through a collaborative process involving a cross-departmental committee of Metro staff, GreenWorks compiled a document including s' observations, an inventory of existing site furnishings, and input from staff. Over the course of four stakeholder meetings, ,.w. the committee refined the final list of furnishings Ylon the merits of existingMetro site furnishings, reviewed :u acommented :A r � � - an inventory of several other park systems' site furnishing `+ '= � •'` '."y ' ti ry standards, and refined GreenWorks initial recommendations into an actional set of design standards. C The City of Tigard has communicated that it plans to conduct a trail amenity study in a future phase of this work. Given our experience, it may benefit the City to integrate this study with the Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Trail Study project. GRIER 11111GRIER 11111 ' 4!�1 Mike Faha, PLA, FASLA, LEED AP Ben Johnson, PLA, ASLA, CPSI PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE v ASSOCIATE I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT EDUCATION Mike Faha is a professional landscape architect and a founding Principal of GreenWorks. EDUCATION Ben is a registered landscape architect and project manager for GreenWorks with 18 Bachelor of Science,Oregon State University Mike's primary professional interest is in creating livable,sustainable communities Bachelor of Landscape Architecture, University years of experience. Ben's responsibilities at GreenWorks consist of design and planning REGISTRATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS that balance economic, ecological, and social needs. Mike leads planning and design of Florida on a variety of project types with an emphasis on parks,trails,and landscape restoration. Professional Landscape Architect in Oregon project teams,which integrate urban ecology,green infrastructure,and urban design REGISTRATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS His expertise includes managing large scale projects including waterfront parks, public (LA242) on a variety of project types. Mike is adept at working with clients, regulators,and Professional Landscape Architect in Oregon plazas,community parks, regional trails and greenways,streetscapes,greenroofs, LEED Accredited Professional stakeholders in creating projects with broad support. (LA587),California(6182) sustainable higher education projects, and regulatory permitting. Fellow of the American Society of Landscape RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Certified Children's Playground Safety Inspector Architects(FASLA),Member and Past President, (2014) Ben has seen many public park, nature-based play area,and trail projects through the Oregon Chapter • Fanno Creek Remeander, Clean Water Services(Tigard,OR) CLARB(2016) various stages from planning through construction. He has been responsible not only for YEARS EXPERIENCE • Fanno Creek Trail:4 Segments, ODOT(Tigard,OR) YEARS EXPERIENCE preparing unique design concepts, but also taking the initial vision through construction. 35(GreenWorks since 1987) • Canemah Bluff Trails and Overlook, Metro(Oregon City,OR) 18(GreenWorks since 2011) This experience has given him the ability to understand means and methods of PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS AND COMMUNITY SERVICE . Columbia River Gorge Visitor Center Experience Assessment,OPRD AWARDS construction and apply opportunities and constraints early in the design process. Urban Greenspace Institute, Board Member Khunamokwst Park,Excellence in Planning, PARKS PLAY AREAS TRAILS AND OPEN SPACE • Eastbank Crescent Habitat Restoration, City of Portland BES(Portland, OR) Oregon Parks and Recreation Association,2015 p y ( ) Human Access,Board Member g Allen Creek Soccer Complex,Cit of Grants Pass Grants Pass,OR • Gateway Green, Friends of Gateway Green (Portland,OR) Organization Award for Outreach,Oregon AWARDS AND RECOGNITION g g AM Kennedy Park,THPRD(Beaverton,OR) APWA National,Individual • George Rogers Park and River Access Improvements, City of Lake Oswego(Lake Community Trees,2014 . Battle Ground Sports Complex,City of Battle Ground (Battle Ground,WA)* Sustainable Practices Award,2016 Oswego,OR) Westmoreland Nature-Based Play Area- Fellow of the American Society of Landscape • Graham Oaks Nature Park and Trails, Metro(Wilsonville,OR) Americans for the Arts Public Art Network,Year ' Canemah Bluff Trails and Overlook, Metro(Oregon City,OR) Architects(FASLA),Member and Past President, • Hogan Butte Nature Park Master Plan,City of Gresham (Gresham,OR) in Review National Recognition to the Best in • Cape Horn Overlook, Friends of the Columbia Gorge(Skamania County,WA)* Oregon Chapter • Hood River Waterfront Park, Port of Hood River(Hood River,OR) Public Art Projects Annually,2015 • Carolwood Park Playground Improvements,THPRD(Beaverton OR) PMLR Orange Line,ASLA Oregon,Award of Westmoreland Nature-Based Play Area-Honor . Columbia Tech Nature Play, PACTrust(Vanccouver,WA) Excellence,2015 • Metro Parks,Trails and Natural Areas System Plan, Metro(Metro Region,OR) Award,Oregon Chapter of American Society of PMLR Orange Line,ASLA Oregon,People's • Minto Island Bicycle and Pedestrian Bridge,City of Salem (Salem,OR) Landscape Architects,2014 • Couch Park Playground and Plaza Improvements, PP&R(Portland, OR) Choice Award,2015 • Mirror Park Bank Restoration, Bend Park and Recreation District(Bend, OR) Cape Horn Overlook*—Honor Award,Oregon • David Douglas Community Park Master Plan,VCPRD(Vancouver,WA) APWA Oregon Chapter,Mike Faha-Individual • Mt. Hood Community College Greenway,City of Troutdale(Gresham, OR) Chapter of American Society of Landscape • Engelman Park,City of Wilsonville(Wilsonville,OR) Sustainable Practices Award,2015 • Mt.Scott Creek Architects,2012 Restoration,Clackamas County Water Environment Services • Fanno Creek Park and Plaza Master Plan, City of Tigard (Tigard,OR)* PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS AND COMMUNITY SERVICE Cascade Avenue Streetscape Plan,APWA, (Milwaukie,OR) Board member,Parks Advisory Review Board for ' Fanno Creek Realignment, Clean Water Services(Tigard,OR) Project of the Year$5M-$25M Category,2015 . Newell Creek Canyon Design, Metro(Oregon City,OR) the City of Milwaukie(2015-present) • Fanno Creek Trail,ODOT(Tigard,OR) Cascade Avenue Streetscape Plan,ASLA Oregon . Noble Woods Nature Park&Trail System, Hillsboro Parks and Recreation (Hillsboro, Member,American Society of Landscape • Fisher Basin Community Park,VCPRD(Vancouver,WA)* Merit Award,2015 OR) Architects(2002-present) • Gateway Green Nature Play Areas, Friends of Gateway Green (Portland,OR) Westmoreland Park,Honor Award in Design, . North Canyon Nature Play Area and Trails,OPRD(Silver Falls State Park, OR) Friends of Portland Community Gardens,Board ASLA Oregon,2014 Hockinson Meadows Community Park,VCPRD(Vancouver,WA) • Pendleton Riverfront Enhancement Planning,City of Pendleton (Pendleton,OR) Member(2002-2005) Honor Award,Zidell Yards Green Infrastructure, • Hogan Butte Nature Park and Trails, City of Gresham (Gresham,OR) • River Island Restoration, Metro(Clackamas County, OR) Board Member,Bicycle Transportation Alliance, ASLA National,2014 Member(2003-2015) Hood Corridor Rail-to-Trail and Plaza, UWT* Zidell Yards Green Infrastructure,ASLA • Riverfront Connections/Lewis and Clark Festival Park,The City of The Dalles(The • Jordan Park Trail,THPRD Beaverton,OR * Dalles,OR) Oregon Nature Play Initiative—ONPLAY, ( ) Oregon,2013 Member(2013-Present) • Khunamokwst Park, PP&R(Portland, OR) CWS Low Impact Development Handbook, • Rock Creek Greenway, Hillsboro Parks and Recreation (Hillsboro,OR) • Leach Botanical Gardens Development Project, Portland Parks& Recreation The Julian Prize for Policy,APWA • Riverfront Plaza Enhancement, City of Pendleton (Pendleton, OR) (Portland, OR) Oregon Chapter,2010 • Rock Creek Greenway, Hillsboro Parks and Recreation (Hillsboro,OR) • Lower Fanno Creek Park and Greenway Development,city of Tigard (Tigard,OR)* Astoria Waterfront Vision Plan,Walter B.Jones Memorial and NOAA Awards for Excellence in ' Southwest Corridor,TriMet(Portland,OR) • Marshall Park Playground, PP&R(Portland,OR) Coastal and Ocean Management 2010 • Springwater Trail Spur, City of Gresham (Gresham, OR) • Metro's Nature Play Advocacy Kit, Metro(Portland,OR) • St. Louis Ponds Master Plan and Trail Design,Oregon Wildlife Heritage Foundation • Mill and Midland Parks Combined Master Plan, Portland Parks& Recreation (Woodburn,OR) (Portland, OR) • Willamette Greenway Trail Design Standards, PDC(Portland,OR) • Tigard Library, City of Tigard (Tigard,OR) *Projects completed prior to joining GreenWorks • Wade Creek Park Phase III Masterplan & Restoration,City of Estacada (Estacada, OR) �• ,. Matthew Crampton, PLA \ Kelly Stoecklein I it JOB CAPTAIN LANDSCAPE DESIGNER I PROJECT SUPPORT i t EDUCATION Matthew is a licensed landscape architect and environmental planner with over 9 years EDUCATION Kelly is a landscape designer at GreenWorks.She received her master's degree in MA,Landscape Architecture, University of of experience providing collaborative design, planning and management services to Masters of Landscape Architecture, University Landscape Architecture from the University of Oregon and a Bachelor of Arts in California at Berkeley. a wide range of public, institutional,and private clients. First and foremost, Matthew of Oregon Psychology from Lewis and Clark College. Her landscape design experience includes BS,Environmental Psychology,Wesleyan strives to ingrain the core values of sustainability,ecological responsibility and Advanced Certificate in Sustainability,University public and private projects of all types and scales in both Portland and Los Angeles where University community enhancement into his work. He brings an energy and passion for context of Vermont she has enjoyed site planning, planting design,and engaging with clients.While growing Postgraduate Studies,Architecture,Portland appropriate design and seeks projects that present opportunities to restore degraded Bachelor of Arts,Psychology,Lewis and Clark up in Vermont she worked in her father's nursery and now appreciates that her family State University landscapes and investigate complex design conditions. Matthew's love for the outdoors, College spent vacations visiting botanical gardens throughout New England. REGISTRATIONS science and improvised music provide for a wealth of inspiration and he celebrates YEARS EXPERIENCE RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Professional Landscape Architect in Oregon landscape architecture's ability to draw from culture and imagination. 1(GreenWorks since 2017) . Washington Park Master Plan, Portland Parks&Recreation, Portland,OR* (LA0819) PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS AND COMMUNITY SERVICE YEARS EXPERIENCE RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Report writer,Sustainable Cities Initiative, • Gateway Green, Portland Parks&Recreation, Portland,OR 10(GreenWorks since 2017) • The Salmonberry Trail Concept Plan,Oregon Parks and Rec/Oregon Department of Eugene,OR,Spring 2016 • Crown Park,Camas,WA Forestry(Tillamook County,OR)* g p g AWARDS • Forest Park Entry and Nature Center, Portland Parks& Recreation (Portland,OR)* Graduate Research Fellow(four terms), • Mt.Scott Creek Oak Bluff Reach,Clackamas County,Oregon City,OR Eisner Landscape Design Award 2008-UC University of Oregon,Eugene,OR,2015-2016 . NIKE Campus, NIKE, Beaverton, OR* Berkeley • Goldendale Observatory,Washington State Parks(Goldendale,WA)* Design-Build Volunteer,Center for the • Block 290,Guardian Real Estate Services, Portland,OR* Tommy Church Award 2006-UC Berkeley • Historic Columbia River Highway Trail, Oregon Parks and Rec(The Gorge, OR)* Advancement of Sustainable Living,Eugene,OR, COMMUNITY SEVICE • Hood River Waterfront Recreation Area, Port of Hood River(Hood River, OR)* 2015 • Eastern Oregon University, La Grande,OR* NWTA Volunteer • Independence Wayfinding, City of Independence(Independence,OR) Corporate Sustainability Committee Member, • St. Mary's Academy, Portland,OR* Friends ofTreets Burton Snowboards,Burlington,VT • Durham Education Center,Tigard,OR* • Independence Landing Waterfront Park,City of Independence(Independence, OR) AWARDS AWARD-WINNINGodBridge ReplaCTScement, • Independence Waterfront Park,City of Independence(Independence,OR) Oregon ASLA Honor Award,Fall 2016 Bellwood Bridge Replacement,ACEC Award- Project Of The Year And People's Choice • Whatcom Waterway Park, City of Bellingham (Bellingham,WA) Awards,2017 • Willamette Falls Legacy Project, Metro,Oregon City, Clackamas County and The State Willamette Falls Legacy Project, Excellence On of Oregon (Oregon City, OR)* The Waterfront Award,The Waterfront Center, . Adam's Street Improvements,City of Milwaukie(Milwaukie,OR)* 2016 • Sellwood Bridge Replacement, Multnomah County(Portland,OR)* Willamette Falls Legacy Project,OR APA Project Of Statewide Significance,2015 Willamette Falls Legacy Project,ASLA Oregon Merit Award,Analysis And Planning Category, 2014 UW Bothwell Discovery Hall,AIA Portland Merit Award,2014 UW Bothwell Discovery Hall,AIA Seattle Merit Award,2014 The Salmonberry Trail Concept Plan, Professional Achievement In Planning Award, American Planning Association-Oregon Chapter,2016 AREAS OF EXPERTISE Landscape Architecture Urban Planning and Design Trail Design Park&Open Space Planning *Completed prior to joining GreenWorks *Completed prior to joining GreenWorks lqjff lqjff - Curt will manage the civil engineering design efforts for this project including trail Paul Dedyo is an associate and project manager who specializes in efficient, approaches, stormwater management and utilities. He brings over 30 years of innovative and sustainable site planning and design. His 26 years of experience experience in civil engineering and project management with a significant record and collaborative, big picture focus enable him to facilitate creative design and of success in developing infrastructure projects throughout Oregon. He has permitting solutions throughout each phase of a project. Paul's extensive ` extensive transportation project experience and understands how to craft experience in stormwater drainage and utility design includes rainwater preliminary designs and construction documents and provide permitting support harvesting, low impact stormwater management and hydraulic/hydrologic to meet the City's needs and requirements.Curt has played a key role in most of modeling.With creativity, imagination and an environmental focus, he uniquely KPFF's pedestrian bridge, streetscape and trail projects, including the recent integrates civil and drainage design into the landscape. Paul has provided multi-use Red Electric Trail and Pedestrian Bridge as well as serving as the planning and design for many local and regional parks and trails and is currently Principal-in-charge for our current work on the Fanno Creek Trail. working with Curt Vanderzanden for our current work on the Fanno Creek trail. Curt Vanderzanden PE RELEVANT PROJECTS Paul Dedyo PE, LEED AP RELEVANT PROJECTS Principal I Civil Engineering Lead City of Tigard, Fanno Creek Trail,Tigard,OR [with GreenWorks] Associate Civil Engineering Project City of Tigard, Fanno Creek Trail,Tigard,OR Manager Portland Bureau of Transportation (PBOT), Red Electric Trail, Portland,OR[with City of Tigard, Fanno Creek Park and Public Use Area Master Plan,Tigard, OR AAS,Architectural Drafting Technology, educationeducation: GreenWorks] Tualatin Hills Park& Recreation District, Fanno Creek Greenway Trail and Portland Community College Metro, Graham Oaks Nature Park,Wilsonville, OR[with GreenWorks] BS,Civil Engineering, Boardwalks, Beaverton, OR USFWS, Ridgefield Pedestrian Bridge, Ridgefield,WA[with GreenWorks] Tufts University Tualatin Hills Park& Recreation District(THPRD), North Bethany Rock Creek Canyon, Beaverton, OR registrations: City of Portland, PBOT, N. Portland Greenway Conceptual Design, Portland, OR Professional Engineer registrations: Tualatin Hills Park& Recreation District,Jordan Woods Natural Area/Jackie OR,WA Wildwood Trail Pedestrian Bridge Over Burnside, Portland, OR Professional Engineer Husen Park,Washington County, OR Tualatin Hills Park& Recreation District(THPRD), North Bethany Rock Creek OR,WAMetro, Graham Oaks Nature Park,Wilsonville, OR [with GreenWorks] affiliations: Canyon, Beaverton, OR Metro,Washington Park Master Plan, Portland, OR American Public Works Association Portland Parks&Recreation affiliations: The Intertwine City of Portland, Bureau of Transportation, Red Electric Trail, Portland, OR Contracting availability: • Khunamokwst Park, Portland,OR [with GreenWorks] American Rainwater Catchment System Portland arks and Recreation,South Waterfront Greenway Park, Portland, OR 15% • Washington Park Rose Garden Access Improvement, Portland,OR p Y Association • PP&R,On-Call Services 2000-Present Cascadia Green Building Council Member Portland parks and Recreation, Forest Park Entrance& Nature Center, Portland,• Oaks Bottom Bluff Trail, Portland, OR OR • South Waterfront Greenway, Portland,OR City of Gresham, Gresham Center for the Arts Plaza,Gresham,OR • Spring Garden Park, Portland,OR • Errol Heights Park, Portland,OR • Gateway Park, Portland, OR • Westmoreland Park Nature-Based Play Area, Portland, OR Oregon Parks and Recreation Department • Milo McGuyver State Park, Estacada, OR • Brian Booth State Park Master Plan (Ona Beach),Waldport, OR • OPRD On-Call Services,Various,OR • Sandy Beach Boat Dock, Portland, OR • Silver Creek Falls Site Assessment, Marion County, OR 0 Cottonwood Canyon State Park, near Wasco,OR lqjff lqjff For more than 19 years,Stuart has worked on a wide range of projects,from Ie � basic structures to intricate,complex and eye-catching designs. Highly !' „ ; John Schnaderbeck is a Senior Project Manager focused on transportation responsive to client requests, he is invested in helping realize the aesthetic ' projects at KPFF.With over 23 years of construction management experience, vision and programming needs of the project.Stuart's vast experience in John has held roles at ODOT and the Federal Highway Administration,Western building engineering allows him to examine challenges from a unique Federal Lands Highway Division. John is skilled in major highway and bridge perspective. He has worked with a wide range of materials and produced an construction projects and programs as well as specialty projects that require in- array of successful systems for new and renovated structures.Stuart draws depth coordination and attention to detail.As a State Railroad Engineer for the upon this versatility and project diversity to produce new concepts that inform ODOT Rail and Public Transit Division for 7 years,John provided technical the design and has successfully filled the role of structural project manager and oversight for railroad engineering and construction projects. He managed I structural engineer on more than 30 parks and recreation projects throughout projects along the ODOT/WSDOT rail corridor,which often involved coordinating Oregon. / with Amtrak, BNSF, UPRR, local shortline railroads,and the Federal Railroad Administration.John has record of innovative,successful solutions to Stuart Finney, PE, SE City of Tigard, Fanno Creek Trail,Tigard,OR [with GreenWorks] John A. Schnaderbeck environmental and engineering challenges on projects involving railroad crossings or construction coordination. Associate Structural Engineer Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission, Cape Disappointment Civil Engineer and Railroad Coordinator State Park, Confluence Project, Ilwaco,WA [with GreenWorks] As ODOT Rail's Project Manager: education Metro,Graham Oaks Nature Park,Wilsonville,OR [with GreenWorks] education: MEng,Engineering Science,Oxford University, B.S.,Forest Engineering and Resource PE/NEPA for rail upgrades and crossover improvements at Willbridge Junction England City of Portland, Red Electric Trail, Portland, OR [with GreenWorks] Management,Southern Illinois University Portland OR * BEng,Engineering Science,Oxford University, City of Gresham,Springwater Spur Trail,Gresham,OR [with GreenWorks] 60%design for operational rail improvements, upgrades,and realignments at England North Portland and Peninsula Junctions of the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR)and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge, Pedestrian registrations: Burlington Northern Sante Fe(BNSF) lines, Portland, OR* Bridge, Ridgefield,WA [with GreenWorks] Professional Engineer registrations OR,WA PE/NEPA for Station tracks at Eugene Station for Overnighting Passenger Trains Structural Engineer:OR Portland Parks&Recreation (PP&R),Structural Engineering Services On-Call, (UPRR/CORP/Amtrak), Eugene OR * Professional Civil Engineer:OR 2011-Present, Portland,OR PP&R, Fields Park, Portland, OR affiliations: PE/NEPA Portland Union Station Seismic Upgrades,Track Improvements,and ODOT Transportation Leadership Institute 2015 Platform Upgrades, Portland OR * professional development PP&R, Circle Avenue Bridge Inspection & Evaluation, Portland,OR 1-84 Sandy River Bridge replacement,Troutdale OR ODOT Bridge Design Conference 2015- Attendee PP&R, Lovejoy Park Canopy Rehabilitation, Portland,OR 1-84 Bridge Replacement over 15-mile Creek,The Dalles, OR ODOT Bridge Design Conference 2014- TrlMet, Portland-Milwaukie Light Rail East Segment, Lafayette Pedestrian 1-84 Bridge replacement over the Mount Hood Hwy 35 Presenter Bridge Design, OR Grant work on the Coos Bay Rail Link system and tunnel Improvements,Coos Bay affiliations Metro, Mt.Talbert Nature Park,Clackamas,OR OR * American Institute of Steel Construction Tualatin Hills Park& Recreation District, North Bethany/Rock Creek Trail Oregon 82 Bridge over Grande Ronde River, Elgin OR American Society of Civil Engineers Improvements, Beaverton,OR Restoration of the Historic Baggage Depot and site into the new Greyhound Structural Engineers Association of Oregon City of Tigard,Jack Park,Tigard,OR Station,Salem OR Reed College,West Canyon Pedestrian Bridge, Reed College, Portland,OR City of Lake Oswego,Stafford Basin Trail Pedestrian Bridge& Boardwalks, Lake As Federal Highway Administration's Project Engineer/Project Manager: Oswego,OR Design and reconstruction of the 1933 alignment of Dunraven Pass(Canyon to Oregon Parks& Rec., Banks-Vernonia Trail Pedestrian Bridge Evaluation and Tower)Yellowstone National Park,WY Rehabilitation, Manning, OR Reconstruction of the East Entrance of East Gate to Sylvan Pass,Yellowstone Cape Disappointment State Park, Confluence Project, Ilwaco,WA National Park,WY* Tualatin Hills Park& Recreation District, Lowami Hart Woods, Beaverton,OR Going to the Sun Road rehabilitation,Glacier National Park, MT Elk River Road Forest access route repair, Port Orford,OR * (* projects prior to KPFF) John van Staveren PHS 43-1 Shawn Eisner IJ45", President, Professional Wetland Scientist Wetland Scientist Registrations/Certifications: Professional Wetland Scientist(#000506) Registrations/Certifications: ODOT Certified Biologist ODOT Certified Biologist Years of experience in field 13 Years' experience in field: 30 Education: B.S. Marine Biology and Limnology, 1987 Education Graduate Certificate in Environmental Geology, 2002 Portland State University San Francisco State University, magna cum laude B.S. Environmental Science/Earth Science, 1995 Professional Experience: University of Wisconsin As President, Mr. van Staveren directs Pacific Habitat Services' environmental and regulatory Professional Experience compliance activities throughout the Pacific Northwest. He has conducted over 1,000 wetland Mr. Eisner has over 17 years of experience providing natural resource consulting services and delineations, 30 Local Wetland Inventories and riparian inventories, designed and implemented preparing federal and state environmental permits. He regularly conducts wetland delineations dozens of freshwater and estuarine wetland mitigation plans. John regularly presents at public and habitat assessments, and designs and monitors mitigation projects. He has helped conduct hearings (often where there is opposition or controversy),provides expert witness testimony at several Local Wetland and Riparian Inventories. Shawn also has experience with Global court trials, and has presented numerous times to peer groups. Positioning Systems. His education has included special emphasis on wetland ecology and John served on three state-appointed Technical Advisory Committees concerning wetland policy geology. in the State of Oregon. He is principal author of the Urban Riparian Inventory and Assessment Representative Projects Guide prepared for the Oregon Department of State Lands and Freshwater Wetland Restoration • Fanno Creek Trail (Woodard Park—Bonita Road), City of Tigard a chapter in The Art and Science of Ecological Restoration in Cascadia. The Science and Practice of Ecological Restoration (Island Press, 2006). • East Fork Derry Dell Creek, City of Tigard • Commonwealth Lake and Schlottman Trails (THPRD) Representative Projects: • Garden Home Park Delineation of athletic field (THPRD) • Jack Park master Plan, City of Tigard • Graf Meadows Park Natural Resources and Permitting (THPRD) • Fanno Creek Trail (Woodard Park—Bonita Road), City of Tigard • Morrison Woods vegetated corridor mitigation and service provider letter(THPRD) • East Fork Derry Dell Creek, City of Tigard • Greenway Park North Bridge Replacement(THPRD) • SW Walnut Mitigation Monitoring, City of Tigard • Hazelia Field Park Wetland Permitting (City of Lake Oswego)Hedges Creek Bank • Hedges Creek Bank Stabilization(Tualatin Parks and Recreation) Stabilization (Tualatin Parks and Recreation) • Tualatin River Greenway Shared Access path (Tualatin Parks and Recreation) • Tualatin River Greenway Shared Access path (Tualatin Parks and Recreation) • SW 112th(Portland Timbers Training Ground) (THPRD) • SW 112th(Portland Timbers Training Ground) (THPRD) • Roger Tilbury Park(THPRD) • Roger Tilbury Park(THPRD) • Bronson Farm Wetland Mitigation Review(THPRD) • Bronson Farm Wetland Mitigation Review(THPRD) • Cedar Mill Park Improvements (THPRD) • Cedar Mill Park Improvements (THPRD) • Lily K Johnson Park Acquisition (THPRD) • Lily K Johnson Park Acquisition (THPRD) • Somerset West Park Wetland Determination and Permitting Memo (THPRD) • Somerset West Park Wetland Determination and Permitting Memo (THPRD) • Waterhouse Park Natural Resources and Permitting (THPRD) • Waterhouse Park Natural Resources and Permitting (THPRD) • Wetland Mitigation Banking Review of THPRD properties • Wetland Mitigation Banking Review of THPRD properties • Rock Creek and North Bethany Trail Natural Resources and Permitting (THPRD) • Rock Creek and North Bethany Trail Natural Resources and Permitting (THPRD) • Jordan Husen Parks Natural Resources and Permitting(THPRD) • Commonwealth Lake and Schlottman Trails (THPRD) FN FN Paul Woerrlein, PE Cory Gieseke, PE Hydraulic and Hydrologic Lead Hydraulic and Hydrologic Modeler Paul has a wealth of skills in water resources engineering including hydraulic and Cory is a Water Resources Engineer with expansive experience in water resources hydrologic modeling,stormwater master planning and conveyance and treatment design, engineering including hydraulic and hydrologic modeling,design,technical writing, and stream restoration design. He has been involved in many project that included permitting,construction management and field work. His design experience includes hydraulic analysis for no-rise,from small creeks to the Columbia River,developing both stormwater, levee and dike systems,culvert sizing, lake and stream restoration,as well one-and two-dimensional HEC-RAS models depending on the project needs. Paul has ( 1 as civil site design.Cory has also performed construction management,construction performed hydraulic analyses as well as led analysis efforts by others. rll(y it i./e �` oversight,and survey tasks for various watershed and railroad projects. He efficiently EDUCATION RELEVANT EXPERIENCE utilizes software programs such as HEC-RAS,SRH-21D, Microstaiton,Civil 3D, HEC-HMS, Bachelor of Science,Civil Arc GIS, EPA SWMM,and HydroCAD. Engineering,heloPortland Clean Water Services,Fanno Creek Ash to Clean Water Services,West Bul Mountain EDUCATION Main,Tigard,OR Hydraulics and Hydrology,Tigard,OR I RELEVANT EXPERIENCE State University The District hired HDR to provide hydrologic HDR prepared a master planning study Bachelor of Science,Civil Oregon Department of Transportation Red Lake Water District,Pine Lake,Gonvick,MN REGISTRATIONS hydraulic analysis and design services for the that expanded the District's hydrology and Engineering, University of (ODOT),1-205 Abernethy Bridge Widening HDR was selected by the RLWD to complete enhancement of Fanno Creek between Hwy hydraulic models to include the West Bull Minnesota Professional Engineer y y and Seismic Retrofit,West Linn,OR an NRCS PL566 planning project for the Oregon, US,#81083PE 99 and Hall Blvd.The project re-meandered a Mountain Area.The project involved HEC- REGISTRATIONS HDR was selected to provide preliminary Pine Lake Subwatershed.Tasks involve previously straightened reach and stabilized HMS hydrologic modeling,stream cross- designs for the addition of two lanes of developing alternatives and preparing an Washington, US,#51462 several highly eroding banks to improve section and culvert/bridge surveys,HEC-RAS Professional Engineer Oregon, nal# ginee E traffic for a 7 mile stretch of 1-205 along with affected environments report.Cory's tasks channel function,floodplain connectivity,and hydraulic modeling,project identification,and seismic-retrofits of the existing bridges.Cory's included preparing two dimensional HEC-RAS INDUSTRY TENURE aquatic habitat.The project also created new documentation.Paul developed the HEC-HMS 10 years wetlands,integrated backwater and tributaries INDUSTRY TENURE responsibilities included preforming FEMA models of the watershed for the six potential g model to produce hydrologic inputs for the No-rise analysis for multiple bridges over alternatives to develop pre-and post-project HDR TENURE to Fanno Creek,and replaced invasive hydraulic model. the Willamette and Tualatin Rivers,a scour floodplain maps.Cory also created a dam 10 years vegetation with native plant communities. Clean Water Services,Bethany Creek HDRTENURE analysis using SRH-2D,preliminary sizing and breach model using HEC-RAS 2D to assess Paul led the design effort,coordinated the Enhancement Pilot Project,North Bethany,OR 5 years placing stormwater facilities along the corridor infrastructure damage and loss of life potential. OFFICE LOCATION development of construction documents,and This pilot project focused on wetland to meet the required design criteria developing He utilized Civil 3D to design alternatives and Portland,Oregon led the hydraulic analysis to show no-rise as a OFFICE LOCATION g enhancement,reconnection of the floodplain, cost estimates,and drafting preliminary calculate quantities and cost estimates for the result of the project improvements. and minimizing erosion potential by maximizing Portland,Oregon plans.Cory utilized HEC-RAS,Microstation, alternatives. Oak Lodge Water Services(OLWS),Boardman stormwater flow attenuation within a natural Flowmaster,HEC-2,HydroCAD,and Arc GIS in Roseau River Watershed District(RRWD), Wetland Design,Boardman,OR wetland along the Bethany Creek corridor near the development of the plans,report and cost Roseau Lake Rehabilitation,Roseau,MN HDR assisted OLWS with improvement of NW Kaiser Road.The HDR team incorporated estimates. HDR was selected by RRWD to develop a wetland function and park and playground the use of natural features,planting of native Oak Lodge Water Services,Boardman flood damage reduction project near Roseau, design for the Boardman Wetland Complex species,and gentle grading to provide the flow Wetland Design,Boardman,OR MN.The project involves restoring a 6,000 (located between SE Boardman Avenue and attenuation.The team also quantified how Cory's tasks included analyzing the proposed acre drained lake basin to accomplish both SE Jennings Avenue).The team's efforts changes in land use and stormwater runoff boardwalk and beaver lodge design to ensure it Flood Damage Reduction goals as well as the included an alternatives analysis,public might affect the system.Paul developed design matched the existing hydraulic conditions.This Natural Resources goals of the MnDNR.Cory's outreach and regulatory support,hydraulic concepts,performed hydraulic modeling tasks involved using the proposed planting plan duties involved hydraulically modeling three model development,and final design. using HEC-RAS 2D to assess the concepts' and the proposed design surface to develop proposed alternatives in order to aid in planning Design elements included almost 2000 performance,finalized the design for the proposed cross sections for the project area phases through final design.Cory developed feet of boardwalk,pervious concrete trails, project,and provided construction support to create a HEC-RAS model that accurately both a Preliminary Engineer's Report and Final a pervious asphalt parking lot,an outdoor services. represented the proposed grading and Engineer's Report for the project.Cory utilized classroom,a nature play area,stream channel boardwalk alignment. HEC-RAS,HEC-HMS,Civil 3D and Arc GIS reconstruction,wetland enhancement,and Clean Water Services,Abbey Creek Regional in the evaluation of alternatives as well as in landscape design.Paul served as the deputy Stormwater Approach, North Bethany,OR Rapid Bridge Replacement Program(RBRP) Base Design Service,PA developing cost estimates. project manager and as the engineer of record, H DR worked closely with Clean Water Services g leading the design effort as well as the no-rise to design a sewer trunkline extension as This multi-year design-build project involved Red River Valley&Western Railroad hydraulic analysis. well as wetland enhancement features that upgrading over 500 bridges throughout the Company,On-Call,Wahpeon,ND would manage the additional stormwater state of Pennsylvania.Cory assisting in this HDR provided a conceptual floodplain map and City of Tigard,No Rise Project, Tigard, is runoff by leveraging natural resources and company wide effort by creating hydraulic cost estimate to the RRVW to help prioritize The City ra Tigard contracted HDR is assist existing topography.The design incorporated models using HEC-RAS for bridges that were repairs to the track and embankment along the with Hydraulic modeling and a associated large wood,soil lifts,and reconstruction of a utilized in bridge and roadway design.The James River between Montpelier and Lamoure, evaluation for improvements associated historic agricultural pond to produce a system model results were also used to assess what ND.The 2yr,5yr and 10yr floodplains of the with FCreek Park.These improvements that looks natural and provides significant form of riprap protection was required.Cory James River Valley were analyzed.Cory was included d construction of four bridges, stormwater management benefits.The work also produced hydraulic memorandums from responsible for creating and verifying a two removal of three bridges,and trail/boardwalk included a dam breach analysis to assess the the model results. dimensional HEC-RAS model of the river valley. modifications.Paul worked closely with a landscape architect to refine the design of risks associated with failure of the existing This effort included use of HEC-RAS,Arc-GIS, the bridge approaches to show no-rise for the agricultural pond,prompting the decision to Civil 3D and Microsoft Excel. planned improvements. rebuild the embankment.Paul was a key player in the development of alternatives and design, developed the construction documents,and served as project manager and engineer of record. Dana M. Beckwith, PE, PTOE GLOBAL G I_O BAl. Transportation Monica T Leal, PE Transportation Principal Senior Transportation Engineer Engineering Engineering Years of Experience: 22 Principal Transportation Engineer Education: MS, Transportation Engineering, Oregon State University, 1996 Years of Experience: 16 Years BS, Civil Engineering, Oregon State University, 1995 Education: MBEP, University of Washington, Foster School of Business, 2016; Professional Registration: Oregon Professional Civil Engineer No. 53044 MS, Civil Engineering, Portland State University, 2002; Idaho Professional Civil Engineer No. 12085 BS, Civil Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota,Colombia, 1997 Washington Professional Civil Engineer No. 39179 Registrations: Oregon Professional Civil Engineer No. 75113PE; `I,'`i Professional Traffic Operations Engineer® No. 2206 P� Areas of Expertise: Pedestrian facility design;Traffic signal design and operations; intelligentDana Beckwith, PE, PTOE is a principal of GTEng and has extensive experience transportation systems operations and design; roadway and pathway lighting design,analysis, " working on multi-jurisdictional projects, gaining concurrence on concept and final r feasibility studies and planning; planning and design;transportation safety studies;traffic operations designs of traffic engineering elements. He has experience with design standards used by local agencies analysis; roadway geometrics; roadway signing/striping;temporary traffic control design;traffic and DOT's. Dana enjoys the challenge of developing new concepts and working with local agencies to help management plans. them achieve their project goals. Dana understands the importance of multimodal design and is experienced in developing unique and enhanced pedestrian and bike crossing treatments. Background: Monica has extensive experience throughout Washington and Oregon in the design of pedestrian facilities, traffic signals, roadway signing and striping, interconnect design, roadway and pathway lighting,temporary traffic control Areas of Expertise: Traffic signal design and operations; intelligent transportation systems operations and during construction,traffic operations analysis,traffic signal operations,capacity analysis,traffic impact studies,safety design; roadway lighting design, analysis, feasibility studies and planning; parking analysis; pedestrian and studies,construction services,and traffic signal and temporary traffic control inspections. bikeway Operations, planning and design; regional trail design; roundabouts; safety studies; neighborhood traffic calming; traffic operations analysis; roadway geometrics; roadway signing and striping; traffic EXPERIENCE management plans; temporary traffic control; construction management; and rail crossing orders. Tolbert Street Overcrossing,Clackamas County,OR*. As project manager, Monica prepared the final PS&E for a new North Bethany Rock Creek Trail,Washington County, OR. Dana researched, analyzed, recommended, traffic signal,striping,signing,and the interconnect system.This project included work along the new Tolbert Street heavy and designed trail crossing treatments for the North Bethany Rock Creek Trail Master Plan that included rail overcrossing between 82nd Drive and Minutemen Way. Bike and pedestrian facilities were included as part of this lighting, pedestrian and bike signal on NW 185th Ave; rectangular rapid flashing beacons on NW West project. Monica worked closely with the project team, PGE,and Clackamas County to develop final design elements. Union Rd and NW Kaiser Rd; signing and striping treatments on NW Reindeer Dr and NW 149th Ct; OR99: Roosevelt Blvd-Garfield Street Bike and Pedestrian Improvements,City of Eugene,OR*. As a project engineer, crossing treatment location evaluation on NW Springville Rd adjacent to the PCC Rock Creek Campus, for the Tualatin Hills Parks and Recreation District. He worked with Washington County to secure approval for Monica prepared the final PS&E for pedestrian and bicycle facility improvements along Highway 99 between Roosevelt final crossing treatments. Standards for crossing treatments included NCHRP Report 562 Improving Boulevard and Garfield Street in Eugene, Oregon.A separated shared-use path from Roosevelt Boulevard to West 5th Pedestrian Safety at Unsignalized Crossings and the Washington County Approval Process for New Avenue and additional sidewalks from West 5th Avenue to Garfield Street were constructed to improve connectivity, Pedestrian Crossings at Mid-Block Locations and Uncontrolled Intersections. environmental sustainability, and pedestrian/bicycle access along Highway 99W.This project included traffic signal modifications at the OR99/Roosevelt Blvd intersection and a new traffic signal at the W 5th Avenue/W 7th Avenue Multnomah Boulevard Improvement Project, Portland, OR. As the traffic engineering project manager, intersection.A new LED lighting System was designed along oR99 between Roosevelt Blvd and just east of wstn Avenue. Dana managed the design of traffic signal modifications, signing and striping for a new cycle track facility, and temporary traffic control along Multnomah Boulevard between SW Barbur Boulevard and SW 31st During construction, Monica responded to construction inquiries and reviewed traffic signal and lighting material Avenue. The traffic signal modifications included loop replacement and traffic signal control cabinet Submittals' replacement. The temporary traffic control included the development of staged construction concepts and Trolley Trail Final Design,Clackamas County,OR*.As project engineer, Monica prepared the final PS&E for final bikeway plans, site-specific temporary traffic control plans and detours. Temporary traffic control was designed to design and traffic engineering services for the new pedestrian and bike trail,a separated path with 16 roadway crossings, accommodate pedestrians, bicycles, and motor vehicles. a median running path, bike boulevard treatments,and bikeway markings on shared low-volume roadways. This project Trolley Trail Final Design, Clackamas County, OR. As project manager, Dana was responsible for final included intersection treatments,signing and striping, path signing,and route guidance for the preferred alternatives. bikeway design and traffic engineering services for the new pedestrian and bike trail, a separated path with Monica participated in the coordination efforts with Clackamas County and ODOT to develop sound engineering solutions. 16 roadway crossings, a median running path, bike boulevard treatments, and bikeway markings on shared Cornelius Pedestrian Study—N Adair St/N 12th Ave and E Baseline St/N 12th Ave,City of Cornelius,OR.As a project low-volume roadways. Dana worked closely with the project team, ODOT, Clackamas County, and North engineer, Monica participated in the transportation analysis performed to evaluate the need for pedestrian crossing Clackamas Parks and Recreation to develop, compare, and select alternatives for roadway crossing treatments at the unsignalized intersections of N Adair Street/N 12th Avenue and E Baseline Street/N 12th Avenue.The treatments, signing, markings, and traffic signal control. He applied MUTCD, NCHRP, and AASHTO guidelines to facilitate discussions and comparison of alternatives. With the design team,he developed study also identified recommended treatment options for both intersections.The goal of the project was to improve CLO sound engineered solutions and created final design plans for the intersection treatments, signing and cu CL pedestrian facilities and increase safety within the study area. striping, path signing, and route guidance for the preferred alternatives. *Experience Prior to GTEng Epic Land Solutions, Inc. Phone:(971)347-8031 Portland Office covercamp@stratoscapecorp.com 10300 SW Greenburg Road,Suite 370 www.stratoscapecorp.com Portland,OR 97223 Phone:(503)213-3977 Fax:(503)244-0627 STRATOSCAPE www.epiciand.com CORP oe Dave Nickerson, Right of Way Lead CASEY OVERCAMP, PRESIDENT AND LICENSED PILOT Years of Experience: 15 Years with Firm: 3 Education: B.S. Business Management, University of Phoenix Casey Overcamp provides hands-on management of every sUAS/drone project and often performs as the Licensure: Real Estate Broker, OR, License#200501053; Real Estate Pilot in Command (PIC) himself to ensure the optimum quality. Casey brings a particular expertise to Broker,WA, License#119736; Notary Public, OR, Commission drone usage in infrastructure projects as he has 18 years experience in government funded projects. #937374; Notary Public,WA, Commission#177579 Safety and effective imagery capture for client purposes are Casey's highest priorities. His passion is to Associations: Member, International Right of Way Association (IRWA) utilize the new technology of drones to improve how projects are built and managed. Biography Dave Nickerson has worked as a licensed real estate broker in Oregon since 2004. He maintains broker licenses in REGISTRATIONS Airman Certificate: Remote Pilot License#1257246 both Oregon and Washington and has two years of Uniform Act experience. Dave has honed his client relation AND Designated SR/WA, International Right of Way Association skills through the years by performing value determinations for single- and multi-family properties as well as CERTIFICATIONS Real Estate Principal Broker(Oregon License#200608028) vacant land and lots. He works as an Assistant Project Manager for Epic, presenting offers from clients,responding to property owner/occupant concerns, performing complex negotiations and ensuring project work meets Bachelor of Science Business Accounting, Biola University,CA scheduled deadlines. Prior to Epic, Dave was a Broker in a local real estate firm and was a member of the Portland Metropolitan Association of Realtors° Masters Circle. To be considered for membership, one must exemplify SAMPLE WADE CREEK PHASE 3—ESTACADA, OR—GREENWORKS strict moral and ethical standards as well as top sales skills. EXPERIENCE In order to have an accurate and detailed understanding of an existing pond and park for a Notable Projects restoration project, Greenworks hired Stratoscape to provide aerial imagery. After conducting Reed's Crossing,City of Hillsboro,OR,Senior Acquisition Agent:Epic provided acquisition services in support of the a comprehensive flight of the area, Stratoscape prepared and delivered a 3D model,an Cornelius Pass Road extension.This project will provide significant relief for the congestion and safety problems at the orthomosaic and a orthofacade as well as file formats interoperable with CAD. intersection of 209th and TV Highway.Additionally,it will accommodate future well-planned and higher-density mixed-use development. SHERWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT—SHERWOOD,OR—CORNERSTONE MANAGEMENT GROUP 124th Street Extension,Washington County,OR,Senior Agent: Epic provided comprehensive right of way services Stratoscape is providing construction status documentation in the form of a bi-weekly aerial for a county road extension including relocations and full-and part-take acquisitions of residential and commercial construction status reports. The report includes links to an orbit video of the construction properties. One parcel included 15 different lots requiring paperwork for each lot. Many of the properties included site, a high-resolution ortho-mosaic of the site and 8 angled photos and is sent to nearly a multiple previously unperceived business tenants that required eligibility determination and relocation benefits as dozen project partners and key stakeholders. well as relocation services. Boones Ferry to Brown Road Connector Corridor Plan,City of Wilsonville,OR,Senior Right of Way Agent:As a part 8Th STREET BRIDGE REPLACEMENT—CITY OF PENDLETON,OR—OBEC ENGINEERS of its Transportation System Plan,the City of Wilsonville is constructing a roadway to link Boones Ferry Road to In order to connect a bridge replacement project to the community, OBEC hired Stratoscape Brown Road.The project aims to connect neighborhoods, reduce traffic congestion and improve pedestrian and bicycle routes.Several intersections will be built with sensitivity to pedestrian and bicyclist safety.The project will Corp to obtain aerial photos of the current bridge. Future bridge and road design elements cross Coffee Lake Creek and,thus, requires a crossing structure.The project team developed the preferred project were overlaid onto the aerial image and printed on large format prints to display at alternative that was approved by the City Council for adoption. Epic provided an in-depth analysis considering right community meetings and on project communications. The result was community buy-in and of way and relocation impacts and cost for four proposed alternatives. Epic's recommendation was a key support for the project even from landowners directly impacted by the project. component in the City's decision. Hersey Street Sidewalk:N Main St.to Oak St.,City of Ashland,OR,Senior Agent: Hersey Street extends from N. Main St. VINEYARD PLANNING- NEWBERG,OR-CODY WRIGHT VINEYARDS to N. Mountain Ave.The section from N. Main St.to Oak St. has only a few isolated sections of sidewalk,requiring As part of the planning process to establish a new vineyard,Stratoscape prepared a digital pedestrians to walk in the bike lanes or on unimproved areas behind the curb.There are limited accommodations for terrain model with multiple GIS layers. Topographical lines along with slope direction allowed handicap access in this section. In support of the City's efforts to provide convenient and continuous facilities, Epic is vineyard consultants to plan rows for optimum sun exposure and within slope parameters for providing right of way acquisition services for 15 properties.The Epic team is acquiring 14 temporary easements and five permanent easements. Property types include vacant land,single-family residential and condominiums. tractor max angles. The 3D modeling allowed planners that hadn't been to the site to visualize details of the site and make critical decisions for execution. a •s yo .-`� � '�C '9 B• e ` X74 Y 'u' .� v�_' �' � •�d�/jam � ��a� � �}_-_ • •bca �?' Fay .. i f '-ict L �� cZ �.!,.c srF r rte` `'NG F6��•+,,�_ yff� q 1 �� dip Learn . S � �� ���3.; o`°• + <<.�.=y � cwt C r r�•'.CICK .K �. .�J`• E[� r• _(.` r� .ter•.. ••-lbb�y ?- . 4 ' Learn More About GreenWorks www.GreenWorksPC.com GREER I '