Loading...
MLP2015-00005 EXPIRED M P2015 - 00005 DEOCA PARTITION NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 2015-00005 m DEOCA PARTITION 120 DAYS =January 8,2016 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: DEOCA PARTITION CASE NO.: Minor Land Partition (MLP) MLP2015-00005 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting a Minor Land Partition to divide a 0.38-acre site into two (2) parcels. The subject site is located on SyY,'74`''Avenue,between SW Taylors Ferry Road and Shy'Shady Lane.Proposed lots will each be 7,502 square feet in size. APPLICANT: George Deoca 9230 SW 7e Avenue Tigard,OR 97223 OWNER: George&Silka Deoca 9230 SW 7e Avenue Tigard,OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Densit<T Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also pertiitted conditionally. LOCATION: 9230 SW 74'''Avenue;WCTN11S125DB,Tax Lot 2800 PROPOSED PARCEL 1: 7,502 Square Feet. PROPOSED PARCEL 2: 7,502 Square Feet. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section V. NOTICE OF DECISION DILP2015-00005/DEOCA PARTITION PAGE 1 OF 22 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY SITE WORK: The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the PLANNING DIVISION, ATTN: LINA SMITH (503)718- 2438 or LinaCS(&,tigard-or.gyov. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 1. Prior to commencing any site work, the project arborist shall perform a site inspection for tree protection measures, document compliance/non-compliance with the Urban Forestry Plan, and send written verification with a signature of approval directly to the project planner within one week of the site inspection. 2. Prior to commencing any site work,the applicant shall submit to the city the current Inventory Data Collection fee ($291) for Urban Forestry Plan implementation(Urban Forestry Manual,Section 11,Part 3). 3. The project arborist shall perform semimonthly (twice monthly) site inspections for tree protection measures during periods of active site development and construction, document compliance/non-compliance with the Urban Forestry Plan, and send written verification with a signature of approval directly to the project planner within one week of the site inspection. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING, ATTN: GREG BERRY (503)718-2468 or greg(&tigard-or.gov.The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 4. Prior to commencing site improvements,a Public Facility Improvement(PFI) permit is required for this project to cover all infrastructure work and any other work in the public right-of-way. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards,which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.tigard-or.gov). 5. Prior to commencing site improvements, the Applicant shall submit the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee",and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 6. Prior to commencing site improvements, the Applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement construction phase. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application, and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. 7. Prior to commencing site improvements, the Applicant's City of Tigard Public Facility Improvement permit and construction drawings shall indicate that full width street improvements, including traffic control devices, mailbox clusters, concrete sidewalks, driveway aprons, curbs, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, street trees, streetlights, and underground utilities shall be installed within the interior subdivision streets. Requirements prior to commencing site improvements for specific streets are as follows: • SW 74`''Avenue,a local street,shall be shown to have: o Right-of-way dedication of 27 feet from centerline. NOTICE OF DECISION NILP2015-00005/DEOCA PARTITION PAGE 2 OF 22 .ON o Any required ditch maintenance o Driveway apron o Street trees and lights o Sewer and water line connection o Confirm need for an additional hydrant with Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue 8. Prior to commencing site improvements, the Applicant's construction drawings shall show that the pavement and rock section for the proposed private streets meet the City's public street standard for a local residential street. 9. Prior to commencing site improvements, the Applicant shall obtain a (CWS) Stormwater Connection Authorization. Plans shall be submitted to the City of Tigard for review. The city will forward plans to CWS after preliminary review. 10. Prior to commencing site improvements,the Applicant shall provide an erosion control plan that includes all on and off site work conforn7ing to the "CWS Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual" (current edition) as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit drawings. 11. Prior to commencing site improvements, the Applicant shall provide a final grading plan shall be submitted showing the existing and proposed contours. The plan shall detail the provisions for surface drainage of all lots, and show that they will be graded to insure that surface drainage is directed to the street or a public storm drainage system approved by the Engineering Department. 12. Prior to commencing site improvements, the design engineer shall indicate on the grading plan which lots will have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that will have natural slopes in excess of 2M'o. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections and/or permits will be necessary when the lots develop. 13. Prior to commencing site improvements, any extension of public water line, hydrants and water services shall be shown on the proposed Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit and shall be reviewed and approved by the City as a part of the Engineering Division plan review. NOTE: An estimated 12% of the water system cost will be assessed prior to approval of the City of Tigard's PFI permit. 14. Prior to commencing site improvements, the Applicant will be required to provide written approval from Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue for fire flow,hydrant placement and access. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO FINAL PLAT APPROVAL: The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING, ATTN: GREG BERRY (503)718-2468 or gregktigard-or.gov.The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 15. Prior to final plat approval, the Applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of $50. (STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, 503-718-2468) 16. Prior to final plat approval, the Applicant shall pay the fee in-lieu of placing overhead utilities underground. 17. Prior to final plat approval, the Applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates [NAD 83 (91)] on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network (GC 22). These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary (per ORS 92.050). Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: • GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. NOTICE OF DECISION \ILP2015-00005/DEOCA PARTITION PAGE 3 OF 22 • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. Final plat application submission requirements are as follows: A. Submit for City review four (4) paper copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon and the necessary data or narrative. • Final plat and data/narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.050),Washington County,and by the City of Tigard. • Final plat shall show the right-of-way dedication for all public streets. • Subdivision plats will include signature lines for City Engineer and Community Development Director. • Partition plats will include a signature line City Engineer. NOTE: Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat until they receive notice from the City of Tigard Engineering Department indicating that the City has reviewed the final plat and submitted comments to the Applicant's surveyor. B. Submit a check in the amount of the current final plat review fee (Contact Planner on Duty,at 503-718- 2421). THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the PLANNING DIVISION, ATTN: LINA SMITH (503)718- 2438 or LinaCS&tigard-or.gov. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 18. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide adequate screening along the proposed flag accessway's north side,in accordance with the standards set forth in TDC 18.745.050. 19. Prior to issuance of building permits,the applicant shall comply with Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue standards. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING, ATTN: GREG BERRY (503)718-2468 or greg�a,tigrard-or.gov.The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 20. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a paper copy of the recorded final plat. 21. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall submit and obtain approval of a construction access and parking plan for the home building phase. 22. Prior to issuance of building permits,the Applicant shall submit and obtain approval of a final sight distance analysis at the S\X'74''Avenue intersection. 23. Prior to issuance of building permits within the subdivision, the City Engineer shall deem the public improvements substantially complete. Substantial completion shall be when: 1) all utilities are installed and inspected for compliance,including franchise utilities and Tualatin Valley\X'ater District approved water connection,2) all local residential streets shall be fully paved, 3) all pedestrian pathways are substantially complete,4) any off-site utility improvements are substantially completed,and 5) all public street lights are installed and ready to be energized. (NOTE: the City, apart from this condition, and in accordance with the City's model home policy,may issue model home permits). 24. Prior to issuance of building permits,the applicant shall submit as-built drawings tied to the GPS network. The applicant's engineer shall provide the city with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins,water valves, hydrants and other water system features) in the development, and their respective X and NOTICE OF DECISION NILP2015-00005/DEOC1 P_-1RTITION PAGE 4 OF 22 .1%hk .,%%, Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91). As-built submittal shall include an Acrobat (***.pdf) file,one 11x17 paper copy and the electronic point file as state above and shown in the example below. Excel spreadsheet/point database file example: "Feature";"Type";"XCOORD';"YCOORD";"ZCOORD": "SSMH02";"MH";"7456892.234";"6298769.879";"192.45" ")XV03" "\X'V" "7456956.654" "6298723.587" "214.05 THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN(18) MONTHS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION,NOTED UNDER THE PROCESS AND APPEAL SECTION OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Property History City records indicate the subject site was originally approved as part of the Boulevard Heights subdivision in 1938, when the property was under the jurisdiction of Washington County.According to the Washington County Assessment & Taxation Report, the site was developed with a detached, sin le-family dwelling in 1946. In February 2015, the pproperty was appproved for a Lot Line Adjustment J-L A2015-00012 with the neighboring property,located at 9210 SNZ' 74`"Avenue (t�7CTM 1S125DB,Tax Lot 2700). As a result of this Lot Line Adjustment, the area of Tax Lot 2800 was increased by approximately 289 square feet, thereby creating sufficient space to install a minimum 15-foot-wide access for residential use (IDC Table 18.705.1). The property was also approved for a Type II Home Occupation for a personal fitness training business in March 2014. Site and Vicinity Information The 0.38-acre site is located on SW 74"Avenue,between SW Taylors Ferry Road and Sys'Shady Lane. The property is also located west of the city's border with the City of Portland, and south of the city's border with unincorporated Washington County. The site is zoned R-4.5 (Low-Density Residential), as are surrounding properties. The property is occupied by a detached, single-family dwelling with attached garage, paved driveway, and associated landscaping. Currently, the existing residence encroaches into the applicant'sproposed 15-foot-wide access easement, however, the applicant proposes to modify the building footprint to eliminate this encroachment. Proposal Description The applicant is requesting a Minor Land Partition to divide a 0.38-acre site into two (2) parcels. The subject site is located on SW 74"' Avenue, between Shy' Taylors Ferry Road and SV' Shady Lane. Proposed lots will each be 7,502 square feet in size. SECTION IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS The Tigard Community Development Code requires that property owners within 500 feet of the.subject site be notified of the proposal, and 6e given an opportunity for written comments and/or oral testimony por to a decision being made. Staff mailed Notices of a Type II Proposal regarding this Minor Land Partition to affected parties on October 1, 2015.No public comments were received. SECTION V. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS 18.420 Land Partitions: 18.420.050 Approval Criteria A.A request to partition land shall meet all of the following criteria: 1. The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations; The proposed partition complies or can be made to comply with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations, as demonstrated by the analysis contained within this administrative decision, and through the imposition of conditions of approval. All necessary conditions must be satisfied as part of the development and building process. Therefore,this criterion is met. NOTICE OF DECISION :\ILP2015-00005/DEOCA PARTITION PAGE 5 OF 22 \,.. 1-- 2. There are adequate public facilities available to serve the proposal; Public facilities are discussed in detail under Chapter 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards of this decision. The findings in that section demonstrate there are adequate public facilities available to serve the proposal. This criterion is met. 3.All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards; and As conditioned,all proposed improvements will meet city and applicable agency standards. This criterion is met. 4.All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements below: a. The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district. The average minimum lot width required for a detached unit in the R-4.5 zone is 50 feet. Both proposed lots meet the minimum width requirement because Parcel 1 has an average lot width of approximately 62 feet, and Parcel 2 has an average lot width of approximately 60 feet.This criterion is met. b.The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot,the accessway may not be included in the lot area calculation. The minimum lot size for a detached unit in the R-4.5 zone is 7,500 square feet. Parcel 1 is a frontage lot that includes a 15-foot-wide access easement, for the benefit of Parcel 2. Accordingly, Parcel 1 meets the minimum lot size because it is 7,502 square feet, exclusive of the access easement area (18.120.030.A.107.g). Parcel 2 meets the minimum lot size because it is 7,502 square feet.This criterion is met. c. Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a legally recorded minimum 15-foot wide access easement. Parcel 1 fronts S\X'74'''Avenue by approximately 62 feet. Parcel 2 is a flag lot that will connect to S`ti'74`"Avenue via a legally recorded 15-foot-wide access easement.This criterion is met. d. Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. This criterion is addressed under Chapter 18.510 Residential Zoning Districts of this decision.This criterion is met. e. When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. This criterion only applies to Parcel 2, which is a flag lot. The applicant proposes to construct a detached, single- family dwelling on Parcel 2,with the front yard facing the western property line. Structural plans were not submitted or required as part of this land use application. However, staff reviewed the applicant's site plan to determine Parcel 2 is large enough to accommodate a detached, single-family dwelling, and still meet front and side yard setback requirements. Prior to building permit submittal, compliance with the standards outlined above will be ensured through site plan review. This criterion is met. f. A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.745.050. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. NOTICE OF DECISION ',\ILP2015-00005/DEOCA PARTITION PAGE 6 OF 22 The applicant is proposing an approximately 122-foot-long accessway (flag pole) that will provide Parcel 2 with direct access to SW 74''' Avenue. The accessway is located within 10 feet of an abutting lot (9210 SW 74`'' Avenue; WCTM 1S125DB, Tax Lot 2700). Therefore, this decision includes a condition that requires the applicant to provide adequate screening along the flag pole's north side,in accordance with TDC 18.745.050.As conditioned,this criterion is met. g. The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire-fighting capabilities. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (TVF&R) was sent a copy of the applicant's proposal, and submitted written comments on October 22, 2015. TVF&R stated, "When buildings are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system, the requirements for fire apparatus access may be modified as approved by the fire code official." Structural plans were not submitted or required as part of this Minor Land Partition; however, a condition of approval has been added that requires the applicant to comply with TVF&R standards. As conditioned,this criterion is met. h. Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot, a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. The easement shall be recorded with the final plat.This criterion will be met. 5. Any accessway shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress, and Circulation. This criterion is addressed under Chapter 18.705 Access,Egress and Circulation of this decision.This criterion is met. 6. Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one-hundred-year floodplain, the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. The subject site is more than 3,100 feet from the nearest one-hundred-year floodplain. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. 7. An application for a variance to the standards prescribed in this chapter shall be made in accordance with Chapter 18.370, Variances and Adjustments. The applications for the partition and variance(s)/adjustment(s)will be processed concurrently. The applicant has not requested a variance or adjustment with this proposal. Therefore,this criterion does not apply. 18.510 Residential Zoning Districts: Table 18.510.1 outlines uses permitted in residential zoning districts. Parcel 1 is currently occupied by a detached, single-famil dwelling. The applicant proposes to build one detached, single-family dwelling on Parcel 2,which is permitted by right in the R-4.5 zone. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2015-00005/13EOCA PARTITION PAGE 7 OF 22 Development standards in residential zoning districts are contained in Table 18.510.2 below: TABLE 18.510.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES STANDARD R-4.5 Parcell Parcell Minimum Lot Size -Detached unit 7,500 sq.ft. 7,502 sq.ft. 7,502 sq.ft. -Duplexes 10,000 sq.ft. -Attached unit Average Minimum Lot Width -Detached unit lots 50 ft. 62 ft. 60 ft. -Duplex lots 90 ft. N/A N/A -Attached unit lots Maximum Lot Coverage - - - Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 20 ft. 35 ft. 20 ft. -Side facing street on corner&through lots 15 ft. N/A N/A -Side yard 5 ft. 20 ft./5 ft. 10 ft. -Rear yard 15 ft. 45 ft. 15 ft. -Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district - - - Distance between property line and front of garage 20 ft. 35 ft. 20 ft. Maximum Height 30 ft. 30 ft. Minimum Landscape Requirement - - - The minimum lot size for a detached unit in the R-4.5 zone is 7,500 square feet.Parcel 1 is a frontage lot that includes a 15-foot-wide access easement, for the benefit of Parcel 2. Accordingly,Parcel 1 meets the minimum lot size because it is 7,502 square feet, exclusive of the access easement area (18.120.030.A.107.g). In addition, Parcel 1 is currently occupied by a detached, single-family dwelling, and meets the development standards for the R-4.5 zone (as illustrated in the table above). Parcel 2 is a flag lot,and meets the minimum lot size because it is 7,502 square feet. In addition,Parcel 2 has sufficient space for future development of a detached,single-family dwelling that meets the minimum required setbacks for the R- 4.5 zone.These development standards are met. *Building elevations were not submitted or required as part of this Minor Land Partition. However, prior to issuance of building permits, Parcel 2 will be subject to standards set forth in TDC 18.730.020.0 Building Heights and Flag Lots. In addition, TVF&R determined that road widths were not adequate for fire apparatus access; therefore, the building is limited to a maximum height of 30 feet. A condition of approval has been added that requires the applicant to comply with TVF&R standards prior to issuance of permits. As conditioned, this criterion is met. 18.705 Access,Egress and Circulation: 18.705.020 Applicability of Provisions A. When provisions apply. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures,the remodeling of existing structures (see Section 18.360.050), and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. The proposal is a two lot partition,which is considered development;therefore these standards apply. 18.705.030 General Provisions A. Continuing obligation of property owner.The provisions and maintenance of access and egress stipulated in this title are continuing requirements for the use of any structure or parcel of real property in the city. The standards of this chapter will be a continuing obligation on the current and/or future owner(s) of these parcels. This standard is met. NOTICE OF DECISION itILP2015-00005/DEOCA PARTITION PAGE 8 OF 22 ", -,*N D. Public street access.All vehicular access and egress as required in 18.705.030.H and I shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the city for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. Parcel 1 is a frontage lot that has direct access to SW 74`'' Avenue. Parcel 2 will connect to SW 7e Avenue via a 15- foot-wide access easement (flag pole). Currently, the existing single-family dwelling on Parcel 1 encroaches into the proposed 15-foot-wide access easement; however, the applicant proposes to modify the building footprint to eliminate this encroachment.This standard is met. H.Access management 1. An access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the city and AASHTO (depending on jurisdiction of facility). Access to the site is provided via S\Z'74'h Avenue,a local street. The proposed driveway is spaced 230 feet from the nearest street, S\X'Taylors Ferry Road. Adequate stacking distance is provided. The proposed driveway is adjacent to the existing driveway and is at a slight crest of SW 74`h Avenue. Sight distance is adequate. 2. Driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be 150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from city engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. No driveways are proposed within the influence area of a collector or arterial street. This standard is met. 3. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The project site is not located along a collector or arterial street.This standard does not apply. 4.The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. The applicant is not proposing a local street. This standard does not apply. I. Minimum access requirements for residential use 1.Vehicular access and egress for single-family, duplex or attached single-family dwelling units on individual lots and multifamily residential uses shall not be less than as provided in Tables 18.705.1 and 18.705.2. TABLE 18.705.1 VEHICULAR ACCESS/EGRESS REQUIREMENTS: RESIDENTIAL USE (6 or fewer Min.Number of Min.Access Width Min. Pavement units)Number Dwelling Unit Lots Driveways Required Width 1 or 2 1 15' 10' NOTICE OF DECISION \ILP2015-00005/DEOCA PARTITION PAGE 9 OF 22 Parcel 1 is a frontage lot that has direct access/egress to SW 74`h Avenue. Parcel 2 is a flag lot that will have access/egress to SW 74h Avenue via a minimum 10-foot-wide paved driveway within a 15-foot-wide access easement (flag pole). Currently, the existing single-family dwelling on Parcel 1 encroaches into the proposed 15-foot-wide access easement; however, the applicant proposes to modi the building footprint to eliminate this encroachment. This criterion is met. 3. Private residential access drives shall be provided and maintained in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Fire Code. TVF&R submitted written comments on October 22,2015.TVF&R endorsed this proposal,predicated on criteria and conditions of approval related to Fire Apparatus Access. The complete letter can be viewed in this land use case file (MLP2015-00005). A condition of approval has been added that requires the applicant to comply with all IAT&R standards.As conditioned,this criterion is met. 4. Access drives in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus by one of the following: a. A circular, paved surface having a minimum turn radius measured from center point to outside edge of 35 feet; b. A hammerhead-configured,paved surface with each leg of the hammerhead having a minimum depth of 40 feet and a minimum width of 20 feet; c. The maximum cross slope of a required turnaround is five percent. The applicant is proposing an access drive that is less than 150 feet in length.This criterion does not apply. 18.715 Density Computations and Limitations: 18.715.020 Density Calculation A. Definition of net development area. Net development area, in acres, shall be determined by subtracting the following land area(s) from the total site acres: 1.All sensitive land areas: a. Land within the 100-year floodplain, b. Land or slopes exceeding 25%, c. Drainage ways, and d. Wetlands, e. Optional: Significant tree groves or habitat areas, as designated on the City of Tigard "Significant Tree Grove Map" or"Significant Habitat Areas Map"; 2.All land dedicated to the public for park purposes; 3. All land dedicated for public rights-of-way. When actual information is not available, the following formulas may be used: a. Single-family development: allocate 20%of gross acreage, b. Multifamily development: allocate 15% of gross acreage or deduct the actual private drive area; 4.All land proposed for private streets; and 5. A lot of at least the size required by the applicable base zoning district, if an existing dwelling is to remain on the site. The subject site is 0.38 acres or approximately 16,553 square feet. The applicant shall dedicate 2 feet of right-of-way to provide 27 feet from centerline on SW 74`h Avenue (a neighborhood route). The site fronts Sys' 74`h Avenue by approximately 62 feet, so the total right-of-way area is 124 square feet (2 feet of right-of-way multiplied by 62 feet). The net development area is 16,553 square feet minus 124 square feet, or approximately 16,429 square feet. B. Calculating maximum number of residential units.To calculate the maximum number of residential units per net acre, divide the number of square feet in the net acres by the minimum number of square feet required for each lot in the applicable zoning district. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP2015-00005/DEOC A PARTITION PAGE 10 OF 22 .-� 0IN The maximum number of residential units is two (2). This is calculated by taking the net development area (16,429 square feet, as determined above) and dividing it by the minimum lot size for the R-4.5 zone (7,500 square feet for a detached unit).This standard is met. C. Calculating minimum number of residential units. As required by Section 18.510.040, the minimum number of residential units per net acre shall be calculated by multiplying the maximum number of units determined in subsection B of this section by 80% (0.8). The minimum number of residential units is 80 percent of two (2) residential units,which equals approximately one (1) residential unit.This standard is met. 18.730 Exceptions to Development Standards: 18.730.020 Exceptions to Building Height Limitations C.Building heights and flag lots. 1. Limitations on the placement of residential structures on flag lots apply when any of the following exist: a.A flag lot was created prior to April 15,1985; b.A flag lot is created after April 15,1985 by an approved partition;or c. A flag lot is created by the approval of a subdivision and the flag lot is located on the periphery of the subdivision so that the lot adjoins other residentially-zoned land. Limitations on the placement of residential structures on flag lots apply to proposed Parcel 2,because it is a flag lot that will be created by an approved 1\1inor Land Partition.The follo`ving development standards apply. 2. The maximum height for an attached or detached single-family, duplex, or multiple-family residential structure on a flag lot or a lot having sole access from an accessway,private drive or easement is 1-1/2 stories or 25 feet, whichever is less, except that the maximum height may be 2-1/2 stories or 35 feet, whichever is less,provided: a. The proposed dwelling otherwise complies with the applicable dimensional and height requirements of the zoning district; b.A 10-foot side yard will be preserved; c. A residential structure on any abutting lot either is located 50 feet or more from the nearest point of the subject dwelling, or the residential structure exceeds 1-1/2 stories or 25 feet in height on any abutting lot;and d. Windows 15 feet or more above grade shall not face dwelling unit windows or patios on any abutting lot unless the proposal includes an agreement to plant trees capable of mitigating direct views,or that such trees exist and will be preserved. These standards only apply to Parcel 2, which is a flag lot (Parcel 1 is a frontage lot). Building elevations were not submitted or required as part of this 1`1inor Land Partition; however, prior to issuance of building permits, compliance with the above standards will be ensured through site plan review. In addition, TVF&R determined that road widths were not adequate for fire apparatus access; therefore, the building is limited to a maximum height of 30 feet. A condition of approval has been added that requires the applicant to comply with TVF&R standards prior to issuance of permits.As conditioned,these standards are met. 18.730.050 Miscellaneous Requirements and Exceptions E.Lot area for flag lots. 1. The lot area for a flag lot shall comply with the lot area requirements of the applicable zoning district. 2.The lot area shall be provided entirely within the building site area exclusive of any accessway (see figure following). NOTICE OF DECISION AiLP2015-00005/DEOC A PARTITION PAGE 11 OF 22 This criterion only applies to Parcel 2, which is a flag lot. Parcel 2 will connect to Sys 74`" Avenue via a legally recorded 15-foot-wide access easement located on Parcel 1. The minimum lot area requirement for a detached unit in the R-4.5 zone is 7,500 square feet. Parcel 2 meets the minimum lot size because it is 7,502 square feet. This criterion is met. F. Front yard determination. The owner or developer of a flag lot may determine the location of the front yard, provided no side yard setback area is less than 10 feet and provided the requirements of 18.730.010.C, Building Heights and Flag Lots, are satisfied. The applicant proposes to construct a detached, single-family dwelling on Parcel 2, with the front yard facing the western property line. Structural plans were not submitted or required as part of this land use application. However, staff reviewed the applicant's site plan to determine the proposed flag lot is large enough to accommodate a detached, single-family dwelling, and still meet front and side yard setback requirements. Prior to building permit submittal, compliance with the standards outlined above will be ensured through site plan review. This criterion is met. 18.745 Landscaping and Screening: 18.745.030 General Provisions A. Maintenance responsibility. Unless otherwise provided by the lease agreement, the owner, tenant and his or her agent, if any, shall be jointly and severally responsible for the ongoing maintenance of all landscaping and screening used to meet the requirements of this chapter according to applicable industry standards. B. Installation requirements. The installation of all landscaping and screening required by this chapter shall be as follows: 1. All landscaping and screening shall be installed according to applicable industry standards; 2. All plants shall be of high grade, and shall meet the size and grading standards of the American Standards for Nursery Stock(ANSI Z60,1-2004, and any future revisions);and 3. All landscaping and screening shall be installed in accordance with the provisions of this title. C. Certificate of occupancy. Certificates of occupancy shall not be issued unless the requirements of this chapter have been met or other arrangements have been made and approved by the city such as the posting of a bond. D. Protection of existing plants.Existing plants on a site shall be protected as follows: 1. The developer shall provide methods for the protection of existing plants to remain during the construction process; 2. The plants to remain shall be noted on the landscape plans (i.e., plants to remain can be shown as protected with fencing);and 3. The tree protection provisions outlined in Chapter 18.790 and the Urban Forestry Manual shall apply to the land use review types identified in Section 18.790.020.A. E. Ongoing tree-related rules and regulations. Any trees used to meet the requirements of this chapter shall be subject to all applicable tree-related rules and regulations in other chapters and titles of the Tigard Municipal Code and Tigard Development Code. The accepted planting procedures are the guidelines described in the Tigard Urban Forestry Manual. These guidelines follow those set forth by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) tree planting guidelines, as well as the standards set forth in the most recent edition of the American Institute of Architects'Architectural Graphic Standards. In the Architectural Graphic Standards, there are guidelines for selecting and planting trees based on the soil volume and size at maturity. additionally, there are directions for soil amendments and modifications. These standards are met, and will be further addressed in Chapter 18.790 Urban Forestry Plan of this decision. NOTICE OF DECISION :\ILP2015-00005/DEOCA PARTITION PAGE 12 OF 22 18.745.040 Street Trees A. Street trees shall be required as part of the approval process for Conditional Use (Type III), Downtown Design Review (Type II and III), Minor Land Partition (Type II), Planned Development (Type III), Site Development Review(Type II) and Subdivision (Type II and III)permits. B. The minimum number of required street trees shall be determined by dividing the linear amount of street frontage within or adjacent to the site (in feet) by 40 feet. When the result is a fraction, the minimum number of required street trees shall be determined by rounding to the nearest whole number. C. Street trees required by this section shall be planted according to the Street Tree Planting Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. D. Street trees required by this section shall be provided adequate soil volumes according to the Street Tree Soil Volume Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. E. Street trees required by this section shall be planted within the right-of-way whenever practicable according to the Street Tree Planting Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. Street trees may be planted no more than 6 feet from the right-of-way according to the Street Tree Planting Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual when planting within the right-of-way is not practicable. F. An existing tree may be used to meet the street tree standards provided that: 1. The largest percentage of the tree trunk immediately above the trunk flare or root buttresses is either within the subject site or within the right-of-way immediately adjacent to the subject site; 2. The tree would be permitted as a street tree according to the Street Tree Planting and Soil Volume Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual if it were newly planted;and 3. The tree is shown as preserved in the Tree Preservation and Removal site plan (per 18.790.030.A.2), Tree Canopy Cover site plan (per 18.790.030.A.3) and Supplemental Report (per 18.790.030.A.4) of a concurrent urban forestry plan and is eligible for credit towards the effective tree canopy cover of the site. G. In cases where it is not practicable to provide the minimum number of required street trees, the Director may allow the applicant to remit payment into the Urban Forestry Fund for tree planting and early establishment in an amount equivalent to the City's cost to plant and maintain a street tree for three (3) years (per the Street Tree Planting Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual) for each tree below the minimum required. The linear amount of street frontage adjacent to this site is approximately 62 feet;therefore,the site is required to have a minimum of two (2) street trees (62 feet divided by 40 feet, rounded to the nearest whole number). The applicant has provided a Tree Canopy Plan, and proposes to preserve two (2) existing street trees for this site: a 26-inch Engelmann Spruce, and a 16-inch Shore Pine. In addition, the project arborist submitted an Urban Forestry Plan Supplemental Report, which describes how the street trees will be maintained according to the Street Tree Planting Standards and Street Tree Soil Volume Standards that are outlined in the Urban Forestry Manual.These standards are met. 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements: 18.765.030 General Provisions A. Vehicle parking plan requirements. No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. A vehicle parking plan was not submitted or required as part of this Minor Land Partition. Prior to issuance of building permits, vehicle parking plan requirements will be ensured through site plan review. There is no indication from the proposed partition plans that this standard cannot be met. B. Location of vehicle parking.The location of off-street parking will be as follows: 1. Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. NOTICE OF DECISION \ILP2015-00005/DEOC A P_1RTITION PAGE 13 OF 22 1%_1 I--, Parking for each single family dwelling is proposed on the same lot as the dwelling. This standard is met. 18.765.070 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements H. Specific requirements. See Table 18.765.2. TDC Table 18.765.2 requires a minimum of one (1) parking space per dwelling unit. A vehicle parking plan was not submitted or required as part of this Minor Land Partition. Prior to issuance of building pernaits, the minimum off- street parking requirement will be ensured through site plan review.This standard will be met. 18.790 Urban Forestry Plan: 18.790.030 Urban Forestry Plan Requirements A. Urban forestry plan requirements.An urban forestry plan shall: 1. Be coordinated and approved by a landscape architect(the project landscape architect) or a person that is both a certified arborist and tree risk assessor (the project arborist), except for minor land partitions that can demonstrate compliance with effective tree canopy cover and soil volume requirements by planting street trees in open soil volumes only; An Urban Forestry Plan that was coordinated and approved by a certified arborist and tree risk assessor (the project arborist) has been submitted.This standard is met. 2. Meet the tree preservation and removal site plan standards in the Urban Forestry Manual(UFM); A tree preservation and removal site plan that meets the standards set forth in the Urban Forestry Manual has been submitted.This standard is met. 3. Meet the tree canopy site plan standards in the Urban Forestry Manual;and A tree canopy site plan that meets the standards set forth in the Urban Forestry Manual has been submitted. In addition, the project arborist has included a signature of approval and statement attesting that the tree canopy site plan meets all of the requirements in Section 10,Part 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual.This standard is met. 4. Meet the supplemental report standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. A supplemental report was prepared and submitted by the project arborist, Rob Crouch Community Tree, LLC. This report includes the required inventory data for existing open grown trees, as outlined in Section 10, fart 3, Subsection D of the Urban Forestry l\lanual. The site is zoned R-4.5; accordingly, the minimum required effective tree canopy for the entire site is 40percent, and 15 percent per lot (Section 10, Part 3, Subsections N and O of the Urban Forestry Manual). Through the supplemental report, the proct arborist demonstrates how the effective tree canopy for the entire site is 52%percent,as Nvell as 36%percent for Pjearcel 1,and 82%percent for Parcel 2.This standard is met. 18.790.060 Urban Forestry Plan Implementation C. Tree establishment. The establishment of all trees shown to be planted in the tree canopy site plan (per 18.790.030 A.3) and supplemental report (per 18.790.030.A.4) of the previously approved urban forestry plan shall be guaranteed and required according to the tree establishment requirements in Section 11,part 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual. The applicant is not proposing to plant any new trees on site; instead, the applicant proposes to preserve existing trees.Accordingly, tree establishment is not required, and this standard does not apply. D. Urban forest inventory. Spatial and species specific data shall be collected according to the urban forestry inventory requirements in the Urban Forestry Manual for each open grown tree and area of stand grown trees in the tree canopy site plan (per Section 18.790.030.A.3) and supplemental report (per Section 18.790.030.A.4) of a previously approved urban forestry plan. Section 11, Part 3, Subsection B of the Urban Forestry Manual states that prior to any, ground disturbance work, the applicant shall provide a fee to cover the city's cost of collecting and processing the inventory data for the entire Urban Forestry Plan.Therefore,a condition of approval is added to address this requirement. This standard will be met. NOTICE OF DECISION -,\ILP2015-00005/DEOC_1 PARTITION RAGE 14 OF 22 18.795 Visual Clearance Areas: 18.795.030 Visual Clearance Requirements A. At corners. Except within the CBD zoning district a visual clearance area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to the intersection of two streets, a street and a railroad, or a driveway providing access to a public or private street. B. Obstructions prohibited.A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge,planting, fence,wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an occasional utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area,provided all branches below eight feet are removed. Based on the applicant's site plan,it appears the proposed driveways meet visual clearance requirements. Construction of new homes and driveways on the proposed lots will be required to meet applicable visual clearance requirements. Prior to issuance of building permits,visual clearance will be ensured through site plan review. These standards will be met. 18.810 Street and Utility Improvements Standards: 18.810.030 Streets A. Improvements. 1.No development shall occur unless the development has frontage or approved access to a public street. Parcel 1 is a frontage lot that has direct access to S\vv' 74`h Avenue. Parcel 2 will connect to SW 74`' Avenue via a 15- foot-wide access easement(flag pole).All lots will have approved access to a public street.This standard is met. 3. No development shall occur unless the streets adjacent to the development meet the standards of this chapter, provided, however, that a development may be approved if the adjacent street does not meet the standards but half-street improvements meeting the standards of this title are constructed adjacent to the development. The street adjacent to this development is SNX7 74`'' Avenue, which is a public street that meets the standards of this chapter.This standard is met. 4.Any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall meet the standards of this chapter. The site is adjacent to SW 74`h Avenue,which is classified as a local street by the City of Tigard Transportation System Plan. The applicant shall dedicate 2 feet of right-of-way to provide 27 feet from centerline on SW 74 Avenue on the final plat.As conditioned,this standard is met. E. Minimum rights-of-way and street widths. Unless otherwise indicated on an approved street plan, or as needed to continue an existing improved street or within the downtown district, street right-of-way and roadway widths shall not be less than the minimum width described below. Where a range is indicated, the width shall be determined by the decision-making authority based upon anticipated average daily traffic (ADT) on the new street segment. (The city council may adopt by resolution, design standards for street construction and other public improvements. The design standards will provide guidance for determining improvement requirements within the specified ranges.)These are presented in Table 18.810.1. 1.The decision-making body shall make its decision about desired right-of-way width and pavement width of the various street types within the subdivision or development after consideration of the following: a. The type of road as set forth in the comprehensive plan transportation chapter — functional street classification. The site fronts SW 74'' Avenue, a local street. Currently, there appears to be 25 feet of right-of-way from centerline. Increasing the half right-of-way to 27 feet will be required.As conditioned,this standard is met. NOTICE OF DECISION 111LP2015-00005/DEOCA PARTITION PAGE 15 OF 22 1%", 1--- F. Future street plan and extension of streets. 1. A future street plan shall: a. Be filed by the applicant in conjunction with an application for a subdivision or partition. The plan shall show the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division and shall include other parcels within 530 feet surrounding and adjacent to the proposed land division. At the applicant's request, the city may prepare a future streets proposal. Costs of the city preparing a future streets proposal shall be reimbursed for the time involved. A street proposal may be modified when subsequent subdivision proposals are submitted. b. Identify existing or proposed bus routes, pullouts or other transit facilities, bicycle routes and pedestrian facilities on or within 530 feet of the site. 2. Where necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed, and a. These extended streets or street stubs to adjoining properties are not considered to be culs-de-sac since they are intended to continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is developed. b. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the city engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost. c. Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub street in excess of 150 feet in length. The proposed driveway is less than 150 feet in length so a turnout is not required. H. Street alignment and connections. 1. Full street connections with spacing of no more than 530 feet between connections is required except where prevented by barriers such as topography, railroads, freeways, pre-existing developments, lease provisions, easements, covenants or other restrictions existing prior to May 1, 1995 which preclude street connections. A full street connection may also be exempted due to a regulated water feature if regulations would not permit construction. 2. All local, neighborhood routes and collector streets which abut a development site shall be extended within the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other standards in this code. A street connection or extension is considered precluded when it is not possible to redesign or reconfigure the street pattern to provide required extensions. Land is considered topographically constrained if the slope is greater than 15% for a distance of 250 feet or more. In the case of environmental or topographical constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection. The area surrounding the site is fully developed leaving no opportunity for a street extension. L. Culs-de-sacs. A cul-de-sac shall be no more than 200 feet long, shall not provide access to greater than 20 dwelling units, and shall only be used when environmental or topographical constraints, existing development pattern, or strict adherence to other standards in this code preclude street extension and through circulation. No cul-de-sacs are proposed.This standard does not apply. N. Grades and curves. 1. Grades shall not exceed 10% on arterials, 12% on collector streets, or 12% on any other street (except that local or residential access streets may have segments with grades up to 15% for distances of no greater than 250 feet); and 2. Centerline radii of curves shall be as determined by the city engineer. There are no arterials or collector streets within the development. The grade of the proposed driveway does not exceed 1Y,'o and exceeds 12% for less than 250 feet. This standard is met. NOTICE OF DECISION AILP2015-00005/DEOC A PARTITION PAGE 16 OF 22 Q. Access to arterials and collectors. Where a development abuts or is traversed by an existing or proposed arterial or collector street,the development design shall provide adequate protection for residential properties and shall separate residential access and through traffic, or if separation is not feasible, the design shall minimize the traffic conflicts. There are no arterials or collector streets within the development.This standard does not apply. T. Private streets. 1. Design standards for private streets shall be established by the city engineer; and 2. The city shall require legal assurances for the continued maintenance of private streets, such as a recorded maintenance agreement. No private streets are proposed.These standards do not apply. 18.810.060 Lots A. Size and shape. Lot size, width, shape and orientation shall be appropriate for the location of the development and for the type of use contemplated, and: 1. No lot shall contain part of an existing or proposed public right-of-way within its dimensions. 2. The depth of all lots shall not exceed 2-1/2 times the average width, unless the parcel is less than 1-1/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. The proposed lots do not contain any part of an existing or proposed right-of-way. Both lots are 7,502 square feet in size,which is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size for the R-4.5 zone (7,500 square feet). Accordingly, the lot depth standard outlined in 18.810.060.A.2 does not apply. These standards are met. B. Lot frontage. Each lot shall abut upon a public or private street, other than an alley, for a width of at least 25 feet unless the lot is created through a minor land partition in which case 18.162.050.0 applies, or unless the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit,in which case the lot frontage shall be at least 15 feet. The applicant has applied for a Minor Land Partition, and proposes to build a detached, single family dwelling on the newly created parcel. Parcel 1 is a frontage lot that has direct access to SW 74`h Avenue.Parcel 2 will connect to SW 74`h Avenue via a 15-foot-wide access easement(flag pole).This standard is met. D. Lot side lines. The side lines of lots, as far as practicable, shall be at right angles to the street upon which the lots front. The side lines of proposed lots are at right angles to the street upon which the lots front (S\X' 74`h Avenue). This standard is met. 18.810.070 Sidewalks A. Sidewalks. All industrial streets and private streets shall have sidewalks meeting city standards along at least one side of the street.All other streets shall have sidewalks meeting city standards along both sides of the street. A development may be approved if an adjoining street has sidewalks on the side adjoining the development, even if no sidewalk exists on the other side of the street. No new streets are proposed. SW 7Th Avenue is currently improved with 24-foot paved width and a culvert. Curb and sidewalk are not proposed since there are no connecting adjacent facilities or means to dispose of runoff collected at a curb. 18.810.090 Sanitary Sewers A. Sewers required. Sanitary sewers shall be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction NOTICE OF DECISION I\ LP2015-00005/DEOCA PARTITION PAGE 17 OF 22 `,.r 1.., Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. C. Over-sizing. Proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the comprehensive plan. An existing sewer lateral from a main line in Sys' 74`" Avenue is serving the existing house. An additional lateral will be extended from the main line to serve the other lot. Further extension of the line is not required. 18.810.100 Storm Drainage A. General provisions. The director and city engineer shall issue a development permit only where adequate provisions for stormwater and floodwater runoff have been made, and: 1. The storm water drainage system shall be separate and independent of any sanitary sewerage system; 2. Where possible, inlets shall be provided so surface water is not carried across any intersection or allowed to flood any street; and 3. Surface water drainage patterns shall be shown on every development proposal plan. C. Accommodation of upstream drainage. A culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development, and the city engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility,based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). Ditches and culverts provide drainage in this area. The culvert along the SW 74`'' Avenue frontage directs runoff towards S`X'Taylors Ferry Road. D. Effect on downstream drainage. Where it is anticipated by the city engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the director and engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (C\X'S) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed IVIanagement Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The city will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities,unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek,the stormwater runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. A fee in-lieu of providing detention is allowable. 18.810.110 Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways A. Bikeway extension. 1. As a standard, bike lanes shall be required along all arterial and collector routes and where identified on the city's adopted bicycle plan in the transportation system plan (TSP). Bike lane requirements along collectors within the downtown urban renewal district shall be determined by the city engineer unless specified in Table 18.810.1. 2. Developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the city's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or rights-of-way, provided such dedication is directly related to and roughly proportional to the impact of the development. NOTICE OF DECISION -i\iLP2015-00005/DEOCA PARTITION PAGE 18 OF 22 3. Any new street improvement project shall include bicycle lanes as required in this document and on the adopted bicycle plan. No bikeways are proposed in this area. These standards do not apply. 18.810.120 Utilities A. Underground utilities. All utility lines including, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: 1. The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; 2. The city reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; 3. All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and 4. Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. C. Exception to undergrounding requirement. 1. The developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of undergrounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of undergrounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which undergrounding would result in the placement of additional poles,rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. 2. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. There are overhead utilities on the west side of SNX' 74`' Avenue. Payment of the fee in-lieu of undergrounding overhead utility lines along the site is allowable. The fee is ($35/foot) (139.07 feet) = $4,867.45. New lines will be required to be placed underground. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Traffic Study Findings: A traffic study is not required by 18.810.030.CC.1. Fire and Life Safety: The applicant shall provide approval from Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue for access and hydrant placement before issuance of the PFI permit. Public Water System: An existing Tualatin Valley Nater District line in SNX' 74`h Avenue will provide service. The service to the existing house will remain and an additional service from the mainline will be provided. NOTICE OF DECISION AILP2015-00005/DEOCA PARTITION PAGE 19 OF 22 Storm Water Quality: Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 07- 20) requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. The proposed development is not of sufficient size to require water quality treatment. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre of land. Since this site is less than one acre,the developer will not be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. A final grading plan shall be submitted showing the existing and proposed contours. The plan shall detail the provisions for surface drainage of all lots,and show that they will be graded to ensure that surface drainage is directed to the street or a public storm drainage system approved by the Engineering Department. The design engineer shall also indicate, on the grading plan,which lots will have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that will have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections and/or permits will be necessary when the lots develop. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard. An addressing fee in the amount of$50.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the city prior to final plat approval. For this project,the addressing fee Nvill be$50.00 (1 lot and/or tract multiplied by$50.00 per address). Survey Requirements: The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates [NAD 83 (91)] on two monuments with a tie to the city's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network (GC 22). These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: • GPS tie networked to the city's GPS survey. • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. In addition, the applicant's as-built drawings shall be tied to the GPS network. The applicant's engineer shall provide the city with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins,water valves, hydrants and other water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91). NOTICE OF DECISION \tLP2015-00005/DEOCA P_-1RTITION PAGE 20 OF 22 -,'IN •_% ROUGH PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS• The Transportation Development Tax (TDT) is a mitigation measure required for new development,and will be paid at the time of building permits. Based on Washington County implementation figures for 2015/2016,TDTs are expected to recapture approximately 28 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. Based on the type and size of proposed use upon completion of this development, the applicant will be required to pay approximately$8,113 in TDTs ($8,113 multiplied by one (1) detached, single-family dwelling). Based on the estimate that total TDTs cover 28 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide,a fee that would cover 100 percent of this project's traffic impact is $28,975 ($8,113 divided by 28 percent). The difference between the TDTs paid and the full impact is considered the unmitigated impact. Estimate of Unmitigated Impacts Full Impact $ 28,975 Less TDT Assessment $ —8,113 Less Right-of-Way Value (124 square feet at$11 per square foot) $ —1,364 Less Street Trees (2 trees at$550 per tree) $ —1,100 Estimated Value of Remaining Unmitigated Impacts $ 18,398 Using the above cost factors, it can be determined that the value of the remaining unmitigated impacts exceeds the costs of the conditions imposed,and therefore,the conditions are roughly proportional and justified. SECTION VI. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Public Works Department and Police Department were sent copies of the applicant's proposal,and had no objections. SECTION VII. AGENCY COMMENTS Clean Water Services (CWS) issued a Service Provider Letter and Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment(CNX'S file 15-001716) to determine that sensitive areas do not exist on site, or within 200 feet of the subject site. The agency also submitted written comments, received on October 15, 2015, requesting a condition of approval that requires the applicant to obtain Storm Water Connection Permit Authorization prior to any site work and partition plat recording. This request has been incorporated into the Conditions of Approval. The City of Tigard and CWS have an intergovernmental agreement stating that the city will ensure implementation of CWS Design and Construction Standards;therefore, this Minor Land Partition approval is conditioned to satisfy,CWS requirements. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (TVF&R) submitted written comments on October 22, 2015. TVF&R endorsed the proposal, predicated on criteria and conditions of approval regarding Fire Apparatus Access, and Building Access and Fire Service Features.The complete letter can be viewed in this land use case file (.NILP2015-00005).A condition of approval has been added that requires the applicant to comply with all TVF&R standards. Attachments: Attachment 1: Site Plans Attachment 2:Clean Water Services,Comment Letter dated October 12,2015 Attachment 3:Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue,Comment Letter dated October 22,2015 Attachment 4: City of Tigard Engineering Department,Memorandum dated November 5,2015 NOTICE OF DECISION '\ILP2015-00005/DEOCA PARTITION PAGE 21 OF 22 SECTION VIII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owners of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON NOVEMBER 19,2015 AND EFFECTIVE ON DECEMBER 8,2015 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G? of the Tigard Community Development Code, which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the City of Tigard Planning Division, 13125 S\X, Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal maybe submitted by any party durijS the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may e adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 4:00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 7,2015. Questions: If you have any questions, please contact Lina Smith, Assistant Planner at (503)718-2438 or LinaCStigard-or.gov. You may also mail inquiries to City of Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. November 19,2015 PREPARED BY: Lina Smith Assistant Planner NOTICE OF DECISION ',\ILP2015-00005/DEOC A PARTITION PAGE 22 OF 22 ATTACHMENT 1 PARTITION PLAT PAR4MN PLAT NO. A REPLAT OF A PORTION OF LOT 4, TRACT 1, -BOULEVARD HEIGHTS" JUXMBD AS DOWAM N'P N0. LOCATED IN THE SE X OF SECTION 25 TTS, R1W W.M. IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WA"GTON COUNTY,OREGON DATE: JIM 26,2015 SCALE r.20' CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING FILE NO. IRIDPrE No rem Fm Vm LIK ur g 30":1•-W i 4w TAX LAT 3100 TAX LOT 2700 TAX LAT 2400 Nil • iIOM P2p in. •Adie fff•.2LD/� {/�orS/f' ROLL Lmf PDL RI SL10 m mm Iq OfIPdR� IK 1109'sY2 i0PJY2Cy S2f• h"U4 TAX LAT 2100 N!!A Af C2NpI0IID-am 1mawfu•2I'orE leiAr NfiCE 1.TIr NMAL PONT ANO PIMRP"x91i11YAcmuf{ 1 130.7r Wo —— <ee9s7 erK l9on aA—r—i PAM —�Aaror1P PP 2003-049 �R g PARCEL 2 8 PARCEL 1 7,502 SF �343 3F 7.5029SF= Z PAt ACCESS Ndt. — PP 2w7AR=236 r Nnrt GF M7 UMICAIN N PALIL7a s ur 402.1Y 71.07 Nl�l,ptt03 � 9A9s a III Poi'eOucvAim xOEN1Y LAT{4,,�1 F f� N9070'007 2761r LRAt•PLAT 3/4'OW Pft i01RdEAAD ILDaNia sN 11092 FARM 2 TAX LOT 2002 TAX LAT 2900 NDA MR f{{[,oRaaQ law I f010FMMf"mm LEGEND • P•LPo rofurENr Aa la1®Norm A fn 5/r 9r 30'a9dt hoc w1N m"m P.M= ND'M. C"WAOM'~00-MIN,°MXX CITY OF TIGARD TAX LOT Mia�ta ANE a11011N FdF IIQOoiOE ONLY.Aa W/wc Ea"wx%m Mum PLAfhG GAP MhlfFll Lf 1 2�f. ON WAfM01q/CAf11y AfOipYll 9M y mum am UIIgN . ON PLGN:AWI mmm VALDE Approved by PI n n i n g a�7lr Qe"9°D°000 9! .�rw,Ef Sall IIOD J) P aaamLTEs i9f/Pft on as m Date: // / /S` u "••^NNM.%tN.. pmm" aN Ro"="m NMfm"MGM CM#M a m."h9mma �o M�sw�els FP scum Pjarnam PLAT MhMN initials: L-� . �. �(I 90-3151 u 1 9F moum FEET -- - L MRT f le WIEW5 071MA7 D�YA170ENLI�I p�Rp:T ie 2l�SAR-FlNALDWO 91447 t Cf 2 / PRELIMINARY 2—PARCEL PARTITION EXISTING FEATURES PLAN / PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT n ' LOCATED IN THE SE Y4 > OF SECTWN 25, TIS, R1W, W.M. IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON ?At " DATE MAY 19,2015 SCALE: 1•-20' CITY OF 71GARD PLANNING FILE NO. VICINITY MAP t 0 m � sib Joan RJ � SCALE:r-20 or ,d� 40 TAX LOT 2200 TAX LOT 3100 It ., �..a. E70811210 f10O! i UX LOT 2100 J,e,rt,'oob z7a1e \ ZM,* ',°�i``.^.��+,. •� �.j� N��.���� _ \ \; \\ � \ s3.� �\• \\`�e- \\ Ddb zz' PP 2003-049 ,i: r• •• FOOIPIIIIm T 70 ! \ 11 \ \\ \ y- ,' K+•AA tLm RMA,mmm C -- 1 \ PARCEL 2 PARCEL 1 7.502\SF \ ,e�\s' \` PAMA 1 I "' \\ O021N0 Ipl!!Xi NE'T INDIG WILL 7.502 Q \\\2411% t ESS \\ \ \ 1 / \-\ \ PP 2OD7-055 \ \ \ \ f26- ` ` \ LOT 2 1 1 �•0• \ \ 71.r \ \ TBM \ EL-280.11 TAX LOT 2900 PARCEL 2 \ TAX LOT 2902 N°'"'AO CITY OF TIGARD TAy1oTs r-e./..��d 1 o Approved by Planyning *RD4M07/Oi/15 CLENT' "awD*Cm NMI Date: ^�hm J `M3M Initials: DWG NUMBER: 14-224-TOPO.DWG DDA�a PLOT: 11-19-14 f -- PRELIMINARY 2—PARCEL PARTITION EXISTING FEATURES PLAN / PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Trees Proposed for 1LOCATED 1N THE SE •,.,y ^• OF 5EC110N ZS. TIS. RIW.W.M. Preservation: IN THE CITY OF TIWO, WASHINGTON GOuNrr,OREGON �r. •• ' 0,%T- MAY 19.2013 SCAM r.W #1:26"Engelmann Spruce r..�r•. dry OF TIGARo PLANNING FILE NO. #2: 16" Shore Pine ' ' #18: 27"Douglas Fir #19:23"Douglas Fir #20: 16"Douglas Fir ACINITY MAP #21: 33"Douglas Fir All other trees proposed for 111 removal a W 4C a d r•x iot raoo rAY lAl SIQI y .J. •.. ux ar 210) Ell=I l ' ` �-+' JF�: 'Sw• ,+p � �� �ur21roM^n a2ittM yC r2sr• _�,' _ PP 2003-040 , 10 I ,i h i�'' r, I, �..• 0" m N0M71r! Ir PARCEL 2 „ f , OOfnxC M0112[ rIL7NrAPMCEL 1 ,' 7.302 3F LL �'•. ,Its, ;r` +Ntll r ':a 7A0 C8Dg r •� PI,2007 .t ,` '_ V for �3 I 227.0 ♦ '.Y M1, \ I Lf i f7PLY0Y 2781 , •. � , \ 1 TIS t ' El•280.11 r•z 1a 21e7 ►AKa 2 t r•M urc 2m CITY OF TIGARD Approved b Planning qq Date: lam' ••�,•r,A Nam of �. P7A 2a�-+ew � .rMr drn way Initials: Z- S1. A.� > « rw .-227 too 1. IIew"07/01/t3 ONAC_.NW� `I!_th 'Y�O.OMO EIEET.1 PO�FpP2T7 Attachment 2 RECEIVED CleanWater Services OCT 15 2015 CITY OF TIGARD PIANNINGiENGINEERING MEMORANDUM Date: October 12,2015 To: Lina Smith,Assistant P Iity of Tigard From: Jackie Sue HumphreyServices(the District) Subject: Deoca 2-Parcel Partition, MLP2015-00005, 1S125DBO2800 Please include the following comments when writing your conditions of approval: PRIOR TO ANY WORK ON THE SITE AND PARTITION PLAT RECORDING A Clean Water Services(the District) Storm Water Connection Permit Authorization must be obtained prior to plat approval and recordation. Application for the District's Permit Authorization must be in accordance with the requirements of the Design and Construction Standards,Resolution and Order No. 07-20, (or current R&O in effect at time of Engineering plan submittal), and is to include: a. Detailed plans prepared in accordance with Chapter 2, Section 2.04.2.b-1. b. Detailed grading and erosion control plan. An Erosion Control Permit will be required. Area of Disturbance must be clearly identified on submitted construction plans. c. Detailed plans showing each lot within the development having direct access by gravity to public storm and sanitary sewer. d. Provisions for water quality in accordance with the requirements of the above named design standards. Water Quality is required for all new development and redevelopment areas per R&O 07-20, Section 4.05.5,Table 4-1. e. If use of an existing offsite or regional Water Quality Facility is proposed, it must be clearly identified on plans,showing its location,condition,capacity to treat this site and, any additional improvements and/or upgrades that may be needed to utilize that facility. 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway • Hillsboro,Oregon 97123 Phone: (503)681-3600 a Fax: (503)681-3603 9 cleanwaterservices.org %... '%-. f. If private lot LIDA systems proposed,must comply with the current CWS Design and Construction Standards. A private maintenance agreement, for the proposed private lot LIDA systems,needs to be provided to the City for review and acceptance. g. Show all existing and proposed easements on plans. Any required storm sewer, sanitary sewer,and water quality related easements must be granted to the City. h. Any proposed offsite construction activities will require an update or amendment to the current Service Provider Letter for this project. CONCLUSION This Land Use Review does not constitute the District's approval of storm or sanitary sewer compliance to the NPDES permit held by the District. The District,prior to issuance of any connection permits,must approve final construction plans and drainage calculations. Attachment 3 nvwww.tvfr.com oxe T ualai in Valley Fire & Rescue October 22, 2015 Lina Smith City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: City of Tigard Deoca Partition MLP 2015-00005 1S125DB 9230 SW 74th Ave Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed site plan surrounding the above named development project. Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue endorses this proposal predicated on the following criteria and conditions of approval: FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS: 1. FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD DISTANCE FROM BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES: Access roads shall be within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility. An approved turnaround is required if the remaining distance to an approved intersecting roadway, as measured along the fire apparatus access road, is greater than 150 feet. (OFC 503.1.1)) The distance of the proposed access does not require a turn around. 2. FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD EXCEPTION FOR AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER PROTECTION: When buildings are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system, the requirements for fire apparatus access may be modified as approved by the fire code official. (OFC 503.1.1) Note: If residential fire sprinklers are elected as an alternate means of protection and the system will be supported by a municipal water supply, please contact the local water purveyor for information surrounding water meter sizing. 3. ADDITIONAL ACCESS ROADS — COMM ERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL HEIGHT: Buildings exceeding 30 feet in height or Three stories in height shall have at least two separate means of fire apparatus access. (D104.1) Due to access width limitations buildings cannot exceed 30 feet in height. 4. FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD WIDTH AND VERTICAL CLEARANCE: Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed driving surface width of not less than 20 feet (26 feet adjacent to fire hydrants (OFC D103.1)) and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. The fire district will approve access roads of 12 feet for up to three dwelling units and accessory buildings. (OFC 503.2.1 & D103.1). The driving surface is shown to be only 10 feet, however the private street requirements will require at least a driving surface width of 12 feet. North Operating Center Command&Business Operations Center South Operating Center Training Center 20665 SW Blanton Street and Central Operating Center 8445 SW Elligsen Road 12400 SW Tonquin Road Aloha,Oregon 97078 11945 SW 70`h Avenue Wilsonville,Oregon 503-649-8577 Tigard,Oregon 97223-9196 g Sherwood,Oregon 503-649-8577 97070-9641 97140-9734 503-649-8577 503-259-1600 5. NO PARKING SIGNS: Where fire apparatus roadways are not of sufficient width to accommodate parked vehicles and 20 feet of unobstructed driving surface, "No Parking" signs shall be installed on one or both sides of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. Signs shall read "NO PARKING-FIRE LANE" and shall be installed with a clear space above grade level of 7 feet. Signs shall be 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and shall have red letters on a white reflective background. (OFC D103.6) 6. NO PARKING: Parking on emergency access roads shall be as follows(OFC D103.6.1-2): 1. 20-26 feet road width—no parking on either side of roadway 2. 26-32 feet road width—parking is allowed on one side 3. Greater than 32 feet road width—parking is not restricted 7. SURFACE AND LOAD CAPACITIES: Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all-weather surface that is easily distinguishable from the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not less than 12,500 pounds point load (wheel load) and 75,000 pounds live load (gross vehicle weight). Documentation from a registered engineer that the final construction is in accordance with approved plans or the requirements of the Fire Code may be requested. (OFC 503.2.3) 8. ACCESS DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved fire apparatus access roadways shall be installed and operational prior to any combustible construction or storage of combustible materials on the site. Temporary address signage shall also be provided during construction. (OFC 3309 and 3310.1) BUILDING ACCESS AND FIRE SERVICE FEATURES 9. PREMISE IDENTIFICATION: New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly visible from the street or road fronting the property. The numbers shall contrast with their background. Where required by the fire code official, address numbers shall be required in additional approved locations to facilitate emergency response. Numbers shall be a minimum of 4 inches high with a minimum stroke width of 0.5 inches. If you have questions or need further clarification, please feel free to contact me at(503)259-1504. Sincerely, > �loW John Wolff Deputy Fire Marshal II Cc: TVF&R File 2 Attachment 4 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: 11-5-2015 TO: Lina Smith, Associate Planner FROM: Greg Berry, Development Review Engineer RE: Deoca MLP 2015-00005 Access Management (Section 18.705.030.1-11) Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. Access to the site is provided SW 74,h Avenue, a local street. The proposed driveway is spaced 230 feet from the nearest street, SW Taylors Ferry Road. Adequate stacking distance is provided. The proposed driveway is adjacent to the existing driveway and is at a slight crest of SW 7411'Avenue. Sight distance is adequate. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. No driveways are proposed within the influence area of a collector or arterial street. This requirement is met. Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of ENGINEERING COMMENTS Deoca Partition PAGE 1 driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. No driveways along a collector or arterial street or a local street along a local street are proposed. This requirement is met. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a Neighborhood Route to have a 54-foot right-of-way width and 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. Currently,there appears to be 25 feet of right-of-way from centerline. Increasing the half right- of-way to 27 feet will be required. Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030.F states that a future street plan shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division. This section also states that where it is necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street. These street stubs to adjoining properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners which shall not be removed ,until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost. Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length. ENGINEERING COMMENTS Deoca Partition PAGE 2 '', ,.0N The proposed driveway is less than 150 feet in length so a turnout is not required. Street Alignment and Connections: Section 18.810.030.H.1 states that full street connections with spacing of no more than 530 feet between connections is required except where prevented by barriers such as topography, railroads, freeways, pre-existing developments, lease provisions, easements, covenants or other restrictions existing prior to May 1, 1995 which preclude street connections. A full street connection may also be exempted due to a regulated water feature if regulations would not permit construction. Section 18.810.030.H.2 states that all local, neighborhood routes and collector streets which abut a development site shall be extended within the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other standards in this code. A street connection or extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or reconfigure the street pattern to provide required extensions. Land is considered topographically constrained if the slope is greater than 15% for a distance of 250 feet or more. In the case of environmental or topographical constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection. The area surrounding the site is fully developed leaving no opportunity for a street extension. Cul-de-sacs: 18.810.030.L states that a cul-de-sac shall be no more than 200 feet long, shall not provide access to greater than 20 dwelling units, and shall only be used when environmental or topographical constraints, existing development pattern, or strict adherence to other standards in this code preclude street extension and through circulation: • All cul-de-sacs shall terminate with a turnaround. Use of turnaround configurations other than circular, shall be approved by the City Engineer; and • The length of the cul-de-sac shall be measured from the centerline intersection point of the two streets to the radius point of the bulb, and • If a cul-de-sac is more than 300 feet long, a lighted direct pathway to an adjacent street may be required to be provided and dedicated to the City. No cul-de-sacs are proposed. ENGINEERING COMMENTS Deoca Partition PAGE 3 1%_1 N%-- Grades and Curves: Section 18.810.030.N states that grades shall not exceed ten percent on arterials, 12% on collector streets, or 12% on any other street (except that local or residential access streets may have segments with grades up to 15% for distances of no greater than 250 feet). Centerline radii of curves shall be as determined by the City Engineer. There are no arterials or collector streets within the development. The grade of the proposed driveway does not exceed 15% and exceeds 12% for less than 250 feet. This requirement is met. Access to Arterials and Major Collectors: Section 18.810.030.Q states that where a development abuts or is traversed by an existing or proposed arterial or major collector street, the development design shall provide adequate protection for residential properties and shall separate residential access and through traffic, or if separation is not feasible, the design shall minimize the traffic conflicts. The design shall include any of the following: • A parallel access street along the arterial or major collector; • Lots of suitable depth abutting the arterial or major collector to provide adequate buffering with frontage along another street; • Screen planting at the rear or side property line to be contained in a non-access reservation along the arterial or major collector; or • Other treatment suitable to meet the objectives of this subsection; • If a lot has access to two streets with different classifications, primary access should be from the lower classification street. There are no arterials or collector streets within the development. Private Streets: Section 18.810.030.T states that design standards for private streets shall be established by the City Engineer. The City shall require legal assurances for the continued maintenance of private streets, such as a recorded maintenance agreement. Private streets serving more than six dwelling units are permitted only within planned developments, mobile home parks, and multi-family residential developments. No private streets are proposed. Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of- way line except: ENGINEERING COMMENTS Deoca Partition PAGE 4 • Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development or; • For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or railroads. • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. PLANNING Section 18.810.040.13.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. PLANNING Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. PLANNING Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(13) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. PLANNING Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. No new streets are proposed. Ste'74`}'Avenue is currently improved with 24-foot paved width and a culvert. Curb and sidewalk are not proposed since there are no connecting adjacent facilities or means to dispose of runoff collected at a curb. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as ENGINEERING COMMENTS Deoca Partition PAGE 5 adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. An existing sewer lateral from a main line in SW 74''Avenue is serving the existing house. An additional lateral will be extended from the main line to serve the other lot. Further extension of the line is not required. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). Ditches and culverts provide drainage in this area. The culvert along the SW 74`''Avenue frontage directs runoff towards S\X'Taylors Ferry Road. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.1) states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997,Clean Nater Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities,unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. ENGINEERING COMMENTS Deoca Partition PAGE 6 A fee in-lieu of providing detention is allowable Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. No bikeways are proposed in this area. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under- grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a ENGINEERING COMMENTS Deoca Partition PAGE 7 `W I.— short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. There are overhead utilities on the west side of SW 74"Avenue. Payment of the fee in-lieu of undergrounding overhead utility lines along the site is allowable. The fee is ($35/foot) (139.07 feet) _ $4,867.45. New lines will be required to be placed underground. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Traffic Study Findings: Fire and Life Safety: ( needs to added ) Public Water System: An existing TV\X D line in SW 74`"Avenue will provide service. The service to the existing house will remain and an additional service from the mainline will be provided. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 07-20) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. The proposed development is not of sufficient size to require water quality treatment. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, ENGINEERING COMMENTS Deoca Partition PAGE 8 grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. A final grading plan shall be submitted showing the existing and proposed contours. The plan shall detail the provisions for surface drainage of all lots, and show that they will be graded to insure that surface drainage is directed to the street or a public storm drainage system approved by the Engineering Division. The design engineer shall also indicate, on the grading plan,which lots will have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that will have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections and/or permits will be necessary when the lots develop. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard. An addressing fee in the amount of$50.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to plat approval. For this project, the addressing fee will be$50.00 (1 lot and/or tracts X$50/address = $50.00). Survey Requirements The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates [NAD 83 (91)] on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network (GC 22). These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: • GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. In addition, the applicant's as-built drawings shall be tied to the GPS network. The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins,water valves, hydrants and other water system features) in ENGINEERING COMMENTS Deoca Partition PAGE 9 %41.- N*.Wl the development,and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates,referenced to NAD 83 (91). Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY ONSITE IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING GRADING, EXCAVATION AND/OR FILL ACTIVITIES: Submit to the Engineering Department (Greg Berry, 503-718-2468 or greg@tigard- or.gov) for review and approval: 1. Prior to commencing site improvements,a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover all infrastructure work and any other work in the public right-of-way. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to CitNT of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.tigard-or.gov). 2. Prior to commencing site improvements, the Applicant shall submit the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation,limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 3. Prior to commencing site improvements, the Applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement construction phase. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application, and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. 4. Prior to commencing site improvements, the Applicant's City of Tigard Public Facility Improvement permit and construction drawings shall indicate that full width street improvements, including traffic control devices, mailbox clusters, concrete sidewalks, driveway aprons, curbs, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, street trees, streetlights, and underground utilities shall be installed within the interior subdivision streets. Requirements prior to commencing site improvements for specific streets are as follows: ENGINEERING COMMENTS Deoca Partition PAGE 10 I—N --N • SW 74`'' Avenue, a local street, shall be shown to have: - Right-of-way dedication of 27 feet from centerline. Any required ditch maintenance Driveway apron Street trees and lights - Sewer and water line connection Confirm need for an additional hydrant with TVF&R 5. Prior to commencing site improvements, the Applicant's construction drawings shall show that the pavement and rock section for the proposed private streets meet the City's public street standard for a local residential street. 6. Prior to commencing site improvements, the Applicant shall obtain a (C)X'S) Stormwater Connection Authorization. Plans shall be submitted to the City of Tigard for review. The city will forward plans to C`A'S after preliminary review. 7. Prior to commencing site improvements, the Applicant shall provide an erosion control plan that includes all on and off site work conforniing to the "C\X'S Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual" (current edition) as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit drawings. 8. Prior to commencing site improvements, the Applicant shall provide a final grading plan shall be submitted showing the existing and proposed contours. The plan shall detail the provisions for surface drainage of all lots, and show that they will be graded to insure that surface drainage is directed to the street or a public storm drainage system approved by the Engineering Department. 9. Prior to commencing site improvements, the design engineer shall indicate on the grading plan which lots will have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that will have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections and/or permits will be necessary when the lots develop. 10. Prior to commencing site improvements, any extension of public water line, hydrants and water services shall be shown on the proposed Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit and shall be reviewed and approved by the City as a part of the Engineering Division plan review. NOTE: An estimated 12% of the water system cost will be assessed prior to approval of the City of Tigard's PFI permit. 11. Prior to commencing site improvements, the Applicant will be required to provide written approval from Tualatin Valley Fire &Rescue for fire flow,hydrant placement and access. ENGINEERING COMMENTS Deoca Partition PAGE 11 *#W. \W.._ THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Greg Berry, 639-4171, ext. 2468) for review and approval: 12. Prior to final plat approval, the Applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$50. (STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, 503-718-2468 13. Prior to final plat approval, the Applicant shall pay the fee in-lieu of placing overhead utilities underground. 14. Prior to final plat approval, the Applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates [NAD 83 (91)] on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network (GC 22). These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary (per ORS 92.050). Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: • GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. Final plat application submission requirements are as follows: A. Submit for City review four (4) paper copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon and the necessary data or narrative. • Final plat and data/narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.050),Washington County,and by the City of Tigard. • Final plat shall show the right-of-way dedication for all public streets. • Subdivision plats will include signature lines for City Engineer and Community Development Director. • Partition plats will include a signature line City Engineer. NOTE: Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat until they receive notice from the City of Tigard Engineering Department indicating that the City has reviewed the final plat and submitted comments to the Applicant's surveyor. B. Submit a check in the amount of the current final plat review fee (Contact Planner on Duty,at 503-718-2421). THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Engineering Department (Greg Berry, 503-718- 2468) for review and approval: ENGINEERING COMMENTS Deoca Partition PAGE 12 N ..N 15. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a paper copy of the recorded final plat. 16. Prior to issuance of building permits,the Applicant shall submit and obtain approval of a construction access and parking plan for the home building phase. 17. Prior to issuance of building permits,the Applicant shall submit and obtain approval of a final sight distance analysis at the SW 74t'Avenue intersection. 18. Prior to issuance of building permits within the subdivision, the City Engineer shall deem the public improvements substantially complete. Substantial completion shall be when: 1) all utilities are installed and inspected for compliance,including franchise utilities and TVyy'D approved water connection,2) all local residential streets shall be fully paved, 3) all pedestrian pathways are substantially complete,4) any off-site utility improvements are substantially completed,and 5) all public street lights are installed and ready to be energized. (NOTE: the City,apart from this condition, and in accordance with the City's model home policy,may issue model home permits). 19. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall submit as-built drawings tied to the GPS network. The Applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins,water valves, hydrants and other water system features) in the development, and their respective k and Y State Plane Coordinates,referenced to NAD 83 (91).As-built submittal shall include an Acrobat (***.pdo file,one 11x17 paper copy and the electronic point file as state above and shown in the example below. Excel spreadsheet/point database file example: "Feature";"Type'; "XCOORD';"YCOORD';"ZCOORD": "SSN1H02"; "h1H"; "7456892.234"; "6298769.879"; "192.45" "yy'V03" "WV" "7456956.654" "6298723.587" "214.05 1:\1iNG\Development Engineering\_I..INDUSE-13ROIL(;TS\74th Aye\Deoca iIILP\Comments Deoca Partition 10-28-15.doc ENGINEERING COMMENTS Deoca Partition PAGE 13 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS N REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: October 1. 2015 TO: Per Attached FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Lina Smith,Assistant Planner Phone: (503) 718-2438 Fax: (503) 718-2748 Email: LinaCSktigard-or.gov MLP2015-00005 - DEOCA PARTITION - REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a Minor Land Partition to divide a 0.38-acre site into two (2) parcels. The subject site is located on SW 74th Avenue,between SW Taylors Ferry Road and SW Shady Lane. Proposed lots will each be 7,502 square feet in size. LOCATION: 9230 SW 74h Avenue;Washington County Tax Map 1S125DB,Tax Lot 2800. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapter 18.420 Attached are the Site Plan and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY, OCTOBER 15, 2015. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions,contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter or email. Written comments provided below: Name&Number of Person Commenting: OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMEN' N NOTIFICATION LIST i--)R LAND USE COMMUNITY DEVELOI-,�iENT APPLICATIONS FILE NOS: FILE NA-ME: MLP2015-00005 DEOCA PARTITION Mark the block to the left of the name of each person or organization that needs to be notified. CITY OFFICES CD Administration/Kenny Asher,CD Director CD Administration/Tom McGuire,Asst CD Director City Administration/Carol Krager,City Recorder Development Services/Planning-Engineering Techs. (except annexations) 1 Development Services/Development Eng.Greg Berry(Copy on all Notices of Decision) 1 Building Division/Mark VanDomelen,Building Official 1 Police Department/Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer(Copy on all Notices of Decision) 1 Public Works/Michelle Wright Public Works/Karleen_lichele,Engineer Tech 1 Hearings Officer(2 sets) Planning Commission (12 sets) City Attorney File/Reference(2 sets) LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS City of Beaverton,Planning Manager,POB 4755,Beaverton OR 97076* City of Beaverton,Steven Sparks,Dev Svcs I\Igr,POB 4755,Beaverton OR 97076* City of Durham City Manager,17160 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd,Durham OR 97224* City of King City City Manager, 15300 SW 116th Ave,King City OR 97224* City of Lake Oswego,Planning Director,PO Box 369,Lake Oswego OR 97034* City of Portland,Planning Bureau Director,1900 SW 4th Ave,Suite 4100,Portland OR 97201 City of Tualatin Planning Manager,18880 SW Martinazzi Ave,Tualatin OR 97062* Metro-Land Use and Planning,600 NE Grand Ave,Portland OR 97232-2736,Joanna Mensher,Data Resource Center ZCA lido ted)* :Metro-Land Use and Planning,600 NE Grand Ave,Portland OR 97232-2736,Paulette Copperstone,(ZCA-RFC Only)* Metro-Land Use and Planning,600 NE Grand Ave,Portland OR 97232-2736,Brian Harper,PhD,(CPA/DCA/ZON)* ODOT,Rail Division,Dave Lanning,Sr.Crossing Safe",Specialist,555 13th Street NE,Suite 3,Salem OR 97301-4179 (Notify if ODOT R/R-Hwy Crossing is only access to land).Email:Regionl_DEVREN'_Applications@ odot.state.or.us ODOT,Region 1 -Development Review Coordinator Carl Torland,Right-of-Way Section, 123 NW Flanders,Portland OR 97209-4037(Vacations)* Email:Regionl_DEVREV_Applications@odot.state.or.us ODOT Region 1 Development Review Program, 123 NW Flanders St,Portland OR 97209 Email:Regionl—DENREQ'_Apphcations@odot.state.or.us OR Dept of Energy,Bonneville Power Administration,Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Ferrera,POB 3621,Portland OR 97208-3621 owerlines in area) OR Dept of Aviation,Tom Highland,Planning,3040 25th Street,SE,Salem OR 97310(monopole towers) OR Dept of Environmental Quality(DEQ),Regional Administrator,2020 SW Fourth Ave,Suite 400,Portland OR 97201- 4987 OR Dept of Fish&Wildlife,Elizabeth Ruther,Habitat Biologist,North Willamette Watershed District, 18330 NW Sauvie Island Road,Portland OR 97231 OR Dept of Geo.&Mineral Ind.,800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 965,Portland OR 97232 R Dept of Land Conservation&Dev.,Dlara Ulloa,635 CapitolStreet NE,Suite 150,Salem OR 97301-2540 TComp Pan Amendments&Measure 37) -You have the option to send electronic copies. See DLCD website for online submittal procedures OR Division of State Lands,Melinda Wood(WLUN Form Required),775 Summer Street NE,Suite 100,Salem OR 97301- 1279 Documents should be emailed/do not send hard copies I/CURPLN/MASTERS/REQ FOR COMMENTS NOTIFICATION LIST(UPDATED 03/30/15) Page 1 of 2 'Y OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMME�� NOTIFICATION LIS T-TIOR LAND USE COMMUNITY DEVELO TENT APPLICATIONS OR Parks and Rec Dept State Historic Preservation Office,725 Sumner St NE,Suite C,Salem OR 97301 (Notify if property has HD overlay) OR Public Utilities Commission,PO Box 1088,Salem OR 97308-1088 US Army Corps of Engineers,Kathryn Harris,Routing CENWP-OP-G,POB 2946,Portland OR 97208-2946 (Maps and CWS letter only) Washington County Consolidated Communications Agency(WCCCA) "911",Dave Austin,POB 6375,Beaverton OR 97007-0375 (monopole towers) Washington County,Dept of Land Use&Trans,Naomi Vogel-Beattie, 1400 SYS Walnut St MS 51 Hillsboro OR 97123- 5625( eneral apps)* Washington County,Dept of Land Use&Trans,Brent Curtis,155 N First Ave,Suite 350,MS 13,Hillsboro OR 97124 CPA)* Washington County,Assessment&Taxation,155 N First Ave,Suite 350,MS 9,Hillsboro OR 97124(ZCA)" Washington County,Dept of Land Use&Trans,Doria Mateja,Cartography,155 N First Ave,Suite 350,MS 14,Hillsboro OR 97124 ZCA UTILITY PROVIDERS,SPECIAL DISTRICTS&AGENCIES Beaverton School District#48,Jennifer Garland,Demographics,16550 SX'Merlo Rd,Beaverton OR 97006-5152 Plans Only Century Link,Right-of-Way Department,Qwest Corporation dba Century Link QC,1208 NE 64th St,4th Floor,Seattle WA 98115 Century Link,Attn: John Pfeifer, 1600 7th Ave,4th Floor,Seattle,VIA 98191-0000(proposed and approved Annexation notices) Century Link,Karen Stewart,Local Government Affairs Director,310 SW Park Ave,Portland OR 97205 (proposed and approved Annexation notices) 1 Clean Water Services,Development Services Department,David Schweitzer/SWTNI Program,2550 SW Hillsboro Hwy, Hillsboro OR 97123° Plans Only Comcast Cable Corp.,Gerald Backhaus,14200 SV Brigadoon Court,Beaverton OR 97005 (See map for area contact) Metro Area Communications Commission(\1),CC),Fred Christ,15201 NW Greenbrier Parkway,C-1,Beaverton OR 97006-4886 (annexations only) Plans Only NNX'Natural Gas Company,Brian Kelley,Engineering Coord.,220 NW Second Ave,Portland OR 97209-3991 Nye'Natural Gas Company,Account Services,ATTN: Annexation Coordinator 220 NW Second Ave,Portland OR 97209- 3991 (.1nnexations only) Plans Only Portland General Electric,Lorraine Katz,2213 SW 153rd Drive,Beaverton OR 97006 Plans Only Portland General Electric,Tod L.Shattuck,2213 SW 153rd Drive,Beaverton OR 97006 Portland)X'estern R/R,Burlington Northern/Sante Fe R/R,Oregon Electric R/R,(Burlington,Northem/Sante Fe R/R predecessor),Bruce Carswell,President and GAI,200 Hawthorne Ave SE,Suite C320,Salem OR 97301-5294 Union Pacific Railroad,Director of Public Affairs,301 NE 2nd Ave,Portland OR 97232(currently the PA Dir is Brock Nelson,503-249-3079) Plans Only Tigard/Tualatin School District#23J,Teri Brady,Administrative Offices,6960 SW Sandburg St,Tigard OR 97223-8039 Plans Only Tigard Water District,POB 230281,Tigard OR 97281-0281 Tualatin Hills Parks and Rec District,Planning Nlgr,15707 SX'Walker Rd,Beaverton OR 97006* 1 Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue,John Wolff,DeputyFire Marshall, 11945 SW 70th Ave,Tigard OR 97223-9196* Tualatin Valley Water District,Administrative Office, 1850 SW 170th Ave,Beaverton OR 97006* Tri-�fet Transit Development,Ben Baldwin,Project Planner,1800 SW 1st Ave#300,Portland,OR 97201 (If project is within 1/4 mile of a transit route) Plans Only Verizon,John Cousineau,OSP Network,4155 SW Cedar Hills Blvd,Beaverton OR 97005 *Indicates automatic notification in compliance with intergovernmental agreement if within 500'of the subject property for any/all city projects(Project Planner is Responsible for Indicating Parties to Notify) 'I'his document is password protected. Please see Joe or Doreen if you need updates to it.'Thank you. I/CURPLN/MASTERS/REQ FOR COMMENTS NOTIFICATION LIST(UPDATED 03/30/15) Page 2 of 2 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: 11-5-2015 TO: Lina Smith, Associate Planner FROM: Greg Berry, Development Review Engineer RE: Deoca MLP 2015-00005 Access Management (Section 18.705.030.1-11) Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. Access to the site is provided SW 74th Avenue, a local street. The proposed driveway is spaced 230 feet from the nearest street, SW Taylors Fern,Road. Adequate stacking distance is provided. The proposed driveway is adjacent to the existing driveway and is at a slight crest of SW 74,11 avenue. Sight distance is adequate. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. No driveways are proposed within the influence area of a collector or arterial street. This requirement is met. Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of ENGINEERING COMMENTS Deoca Partition PAGE 1 N%.' � driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. No driveways along a collector or arterial street or a local street along a local street are proposed. This requirement is met. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a Neighborhood Route to have a 54-foot right-of-way width and 32-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. Currently,there appears to be 25 feet of right-of-way from centerline. Increasing the half right- of-way to 27 feet will be required. Future Street Plan and Extension of Streets: Section 18.810.030.F states that a future street plan shall be filed which shows the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division. This section also states that where it is necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed and a barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street. These street stubs to adjoining properties are not considered to be cul-de-sacs since they are intended to continue as through streets at such time as the adjoining property is developed. A barricade shall be constructed at the end of the street by the property owners which shall not be removed until authorized by the City Engineer, the cost of which shall be included in the street construction cost. Temporary hammerhead turnouts or temporary cul-de-sac bulbs shall be constructed for stub streets in excess of 150 feet in length. ENGINEERING COMMENTS Deoca Partition PAGE 2 ,.-N 1-� The proposed driveway is less than 150 feet in length so a turnout is not required. Street Alignment and Connections: Section 18.810.030.H.1 states that full street connections with spacing of no more than 530 feet between connections is required except where prevented by barriers such as topography, railroads, freeways, pre-existing developments, lease provisions, easements, covenants or other restrictions existing prior to May 1, 1995 which preclude street connections. A full street connection may also be exempted due to a regulated water feature if regulations would not permit construction. Section 18.810.030.H.2 states that all local, neighborhood routes and collector streets which abut a development site shall be extended within the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other standards in this code. A street connection or extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or reconfigure the street pattern to provide required extensions. Land is considered topographically constrained if the slope is greater than 15% for a distance of 250 feet or more. In the case of environmental or topographical constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection. The area surrounding the site is fully developed leaving no opportunity for a street extension. Cul-de-sacs: 18.810.030.L states that a cul-de-sac shall be no more than 200 feet long, shall not provide access to greater than 20 dwelling units, and shall only be used when environmental or topographical constraints, existing development pattern, or strict adherence to other standards in this code preclude street extension and through circulation: • All cul-de-sacs shall terminate with a turnaround. Use of turnaround configurations other than circular, shall be approved by the City Engineer; and • The length of the cul-de-sac shall be measured from the centerline intersection point of the two streets to the radius point of the bulb, and • If a cul-de-sac is more than 300 feet long, a lighted direct pathway to an adjacent street may be required to be provided and dedicated to the City. No cul-de-sacs are proposed. ENGINEERING COMMENTS Deoca Partition PAGE 3 Grades and Curves: Section 18.810.030.N states that grades shall not exceed ten percent on arterials, 12% on collector streets, or 12% on any other street (except that local or residential access streets may have segments with grades up to 15% for distances of no greater than 250 feet). Centerline radii of curves shall be as determined by the City Engineer. There are no arterials or collector streets within the development. The grade of the proposed driveway does not exceed 15%and exceeds 12% for less than 250 feet. This requirement is met. Access to Arterials and Major Collectors: Section 18.810.030.Q states that where a development abuts or is traversed by an existing or proposed arterial or major collector street, the development design shall provide adequate protection for residential properties and shall separate residential access and through traffic, or if separation is not feasible, the design shall minimize the traffic conflicts. The design shall include any of the following: • A parallel access street along the arterial or major collector; • Lots of suitable depth abutting the arterial or major collector to provide adequate buffering with frontage along another street; • Screen planting at the rear or side property line to be contained in a non-access reservation along the arterial or major collector; or • Other treatment suitable to meet the objectives of this subsection; • If a lot has access to two streets with different classifications, primary access should be from the lower classification street. There are no arterials or collector streets within the development. Private Streets: Section 18.810.030.T states that design standards for private streets shall be established by the City Engineer. The City shall require legal assurances for the continued maintenance of private streets, such as a recorded maintenance agreement. Private streets serving more than six dwelling units are permitted only within planned developments, mobile home parks, and multi-family residential developments. No private streets are proposed. Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of- way line except: ENGINEERING COMMENTS Deoca Partition PAGE 4 ,-`\ '� • Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development or; • For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or railroads. • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. PLANNING Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. PLANNING Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. PLANNING Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. PLANNING Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. No new streets are proposed. S\X'74`h Avenue is currently improved with 24-foot paved width and a culvert. Curb and sidewalk are not proposed since there are no connecting adjacent facilities or means to dispose of runoff collected at a curb. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as ENGINEERING COMMENTS Deoca Partition PAGE 5 \.. N*-i adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. An existing sewer lateral from a main line in SW 74`''avenue is serving the existing house. An additional lateral will be extended from the main line to serve the other lot. Further extension of the line is not required. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). Ditches and culverts provide drainage in this area. The culvert along the SW 74"'Avenue frontage directs runoff towards SW Tai=lors Ferry Road. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities,unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be pertnitted to discharge without detention. ENGINEERING COMMENTS Deoca Partition PAGE 6 .-� __N1 A fee in-lieu of prm iding detention is allowable Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. Minimum Width: Section 18.810.110.0 states that the minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. Minimum width for two-way bikeways separated from the road is eight feet. No bikeways are proposed in this area. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under- grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case- by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a ENGINEERING COMMENTS Deoca Partition PAGE 7 S%.01 \%-.- short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. There are overhead utilities on the west side of SW 74`''Avenue. Payment of the fee in-lieu of undergrounding overhead utility lines along the site is allowable. The fee is ($35/foot) (139.07 feet) = $4,867.45. New lines will be required to be placed underground. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Traffic Study Findings: Fire and Life Safety: ( needs to added ) Public Water System: An existing TVWD line in SXX'74`"Avenue will provide service. The service to the existing house will remain and an additional service from the mainline will be provided. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 07-20) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. The proposed development is not of sufficient size to require water quality=treatment. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, ENGINEERING COMMENTS Deoca Partition PAGE 8 grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre of land. Since this site is over five acres, the developer will be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the City prior to construction. This permit will be issued along with the site and/or building permit. A final grading plan shall be submitted showing the existing and proposed contours. The plan shall detail the provisions for surface drainage of all lots, and show that they will be graded to insure that surface drainage is directed to the street or a public storm drainage system approved by the Engineering Division. The design engineer shall also indicate, on the grading plan,which lots will have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that will have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections and/or permits will be necessary when the lots develop. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard. An addressing fee in the amount of$50.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to plat approval. For this project, the addressing fee will be $50.00 (1 lot and/or tracts X$50/address = $50.00). Survey Requirements The applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates [NAD 83 (91)] on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network (GC 22). These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: • GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. In addition,the applicant's as-built drawings shall be tied to the GPS network. The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins,water valves, hydrants and other water system features) in ENGINEERING COMMENTS Deoca Partition PAGE 9 the development,and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates,referenced to NAD 83 (91). Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY ONSITE IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING GRADING EXCAVATION AND/OR FILL ACTIVITIES: Submit to the Engineering Department (Greg Berry, 503-718-2468 or greg@tigard- or.gov) for review and approval: 1. Prior to commencing site improvements,a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover all infrastructure work and any other work in the public right-of-way. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.tigard-or.gov). 2. Prior to commencing site improvements, the Applicant shall submit the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation,limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 3. Prior to commencing site improvements, the Applicant shall provide a construction vehicle access and parking plan for approval by the City Engineer. The purpose of this plan is for parking and traffic control during the public improvement construction phase. All construction vehicle parking shall be provided on-site. No construction vehicles or equipment will be permitted to park on the adjoining residential public streets. Construction vehicles include the vehicles of any contractor or subcontractor involved in the construction of site improvements or buildings proposed by this application, and shall include the vehicles of all suppliers and employees associated with the project. 4. Prior to commencing site improvements, the Applicant's City of Tigard Public Facility Improvement permit and construction drawings shall indicate that full width street improvements, including traffic control devices, mailbox clusters, concrete sidewalks, driveway aprons, curbs, asphaltic concrete pavement, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, street trees, streetlights, and underground utilities shall be installed within the interior subdivision streets. Requirements prior to commencing site improvements for specific streets are as follows: ENGINEERING COMMENTS Deoca Partition PAGE 10 I-N ^ • SW 74'' Avenue, a local street, shall be shown to have: - Right-of-way dedication of 27 feet from centerline. Any required ditch maintenance Driveway apron Street trees and lights Sewer and water line connection Confirm need for an additional hydrant with TVF&R 5. Prior to commencing site improvements, the Applicant's construction drawings shall show that the pavement and rock section for the proposed private streets meet the City's public street standard for a local residential street. 6. Prior to commencing site improvements, the Applicant shall obtain a (CWS) Stormwater Connection Authorization. Plans shall be submitted to the City of Tigard for review. The city will forward plans to CWS after preliminary review. 7. Prior to commencing site improvements, the Applicant shall provide an erosion control plan that includes all on and off site work conforming to the "CWS Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Nlanual" (current edition) as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit drawings. 8. Prior to commencing site improvements, the Applicant shall provide a final grading plan shall be submitted showing the existing and proposed contours. The plan shall detail the provisions for surface drainage of all lots, and show that they will be graded to insure that surface drainage is directed to the street or a public storm drainage system approved by the Engineering Department. 9. Prior to commencing site improvements, the design engineer shall indicate on the grading plan which lots will have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that will have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections and/or permits will be necessary when the lots develop. 10. Prior to commencing site improvements, any extension of public water line, hydrants and water services shall be shown on the proposed Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit and shall be reviewed and approved by the City as a part of the Engineering Division plan review. NOTE: An estimated 12% of the water system cost will be assessed prior to approval of the City of Tigard's PFI permit. 11. Prior to commencing site improvements, the Applicant will be required to provide written approval from Tualatin Valley Fire &Rescue for fire flow, hydrant placement and access. ENGINEERING COMMENTS Deoca Partition PAGE 11 1%4-1 \%—.- THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Greg Berry, 639-4171, ext. 2468) for review and approval: 12. Prior to final plat approval, the Applicant shall pay an addressing fee in the amount of$50. (STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, 503-718-2468 13. Prior to final plat approval, the Applicant shall pay the fee in-lieu of placing overhead utilities underground. 14. Prior to final plat approval, the Applicant's final plat shall contain State Plane Coordinates [NAD 83 (91)] on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network (GC 22). These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary (per ORS 92.050). Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: • GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. Final plat application submission requirements are as follows: A. Submit for City review four (4) paper copies of the final plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon and the necessary data or narrative. • Final plat and data/narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.050),Washington County, and by the City of Tigard. • Final plat shall show the right-of-way dedication for all public streets. • Subdivision plats will include signature lines for City Engineer and Community Development Director. • Partition plats will include a signature line City Engineer. NOTE: Washington County will not begin their review of the final plat until they receive notice from the City of Tigard Engineering Department indicating that the City has reviewed the final plat and submitted comments to the Applicant's surveyor. B. Submit a check in the amount of the current final plat review fee (Contact Planner on Duty,at 503-718-2421). THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: Submit to the Engineering Department (Greg Berry, 503-718- 2468) for review and approval: ENGINEERING COMMENTS Deoca Partition PAGE 12 15. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a paper copy of the recorded final plat. 16. Prior to issuance of building permits,the Applicant shall submit and obtain approval of a construction access and parking plan for the home building phase. 17. Prior to issuance of building permits,the Applicant shall submit and obtain approval of a final sight distance analysis at the SW 74th Avenue intersection. 18. Prior to issuance of building permits within the subdivision, the City Engineer shall deem the public improvements substantially complete. Substantial completion shall be when: 1) all utilities are installed and inspected for compliance,including franchise utilities and T WD approved water connection,2) all local residential streets shall be fully paved, 3) all pedestrian pathways are substantially complete, 4) any off-site utility improvements are substantially completed, and 5) all public street lights are installed and ready, to be energized. (NOTE: the City,apart from this condition, and in accordance with the City's model home policy,may issue model home permits). 19. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall submit as-built drawings tied to the GPS network. The Applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes,catch basins,water valves, hydrants and other water system features) in the development,and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates,referenced to NAD 83 (91). As-built submittal shall include an Acrobat (***.pdt) file, one 11x17 paper copy and the electronic point file as state above and shown in the example below. Excel spreadsheet/point database file example: "Feature";"Type"; "XCOORD";"YCOORD"; "ZCOORD": "SSMH02"; "A1H''; "7456892.234"; "6298769.879'';"192.45" "yy'V03" "``AT" "7456956.654" "6298723.587" "214.05 I:\1 NG\Development Engineering\_LANDUSP,_PRO JLC1S\74th A e\Deoca\ILP\Comments Deoca Partition 10-28-15.doc ENGINEERING COMMENTS Deoca Partition PAGE 13 ® www.tvfr.com Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue October 22, 2015 Lina Smith City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: City of Tigard Deoca Partition MLP 2015-00005 1S125DB 9230 SW 74th Ave Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed site plan surrounding the above named development project. Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue endorses this proposal predicated on the following criteria and conditions of approval: FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS: 1. FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD DISTANCE FROM BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES: Access roads shall be within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility. An approved turnaround is required if the remaining distance to an approved intersecting roadway, as measured along the fire apparatus access road, is greater than 150 feet. (OFC 503.1.1)) The distance of the proposed access does not require a turn around. 2. FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD EXCEPTION FOR AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER PROTECTION: When buildings are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system, the requirements for fire apparatus access may be modified as approved by the fire code official. (OFC 503.1.1) Note: if residential fire sprinklers are elected as an alternate means of protection and the system will be supported by a municipal water supply, please contact the local water purveyor for information surrounding water meter sizing. 3. ADDITIONAL ACCESS ROADS — COMM ERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL HEIGHT: Buildings exceeding 30 feet in height or three stories in height shall have at least two separate means of fire apparatus access. (D104.1) Due to access width limitations buildings cannot exceed 30 feet in height. 4. FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD WIDTH AND VERTICAL CLEARANCE: Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed driving surface width of not less than 20 feet (26 feet adjacent to fire hydrants (OFC D103.1)) and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. The fire district will approve access roads of 12 feet for up to three dwelling units and accessory buildings. (OFC 503.2.1 & D103.1). The driving surface is shown to be only 10 feet, however the private street requirements will require at least a driving surface width of 12 feet. North Operating Center Command&Business Operations Center South Operating Center Training Center 20665 SW Blanton Street and Central Operating Center 8445 SW Elligsen Road 12400 SW Tonquin Road Aloha,Oregon 97078 11945 SW 70`h Avenue Wilsonville,Oregon Sherwood,Oregon 503-649-8577 Tigard,Oregon 97223-9196 97070-9641 97140-9734 503-649-8577 503-649-8577 503-259-1600 ..,► *SW 5. NO PARKING SIGNS: Where fire apparatus roadways are not of sufficient width to accommodate parked vehicles and 20 feet of unobstructed driving surface, "No Parking" signs shall be installed on one or both sides of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. Signs shall read "NO PARKING-FIRE LANE"and shall be installed with a clear space above grade level of 7 feet. Signs shall be 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and shall have red letters on a white reflective background. (OFC D103.6) 6. NO PARKING: Parking on emergency access roads shall be as follows(OFC D103.6.1-2): 1. 20-26 feet road width—no parking on either side of roadway 2. 26-32 feet road width—parking is allowed on one side 3. Greater than 32 feet road width—parking is not restricted 7. SURFACE AND LOAD CAPACITIES: Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all-weather surface that is easily distinguishable from the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not less than 12,500 pounds point load (wheel load) and 75,000 pounds live load (gross vehicle weight). Documentation from a registered engineer that the final construction is in accordance with approved plans or the requirements of the Fire Code may be requested. (OFC 503.2.3) 8. ACCESS DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved fire apparatus access roadways shall be installed and operational prior to any combustible construction or storage of combustible materials on the site. Temporary address signage shall also be provided during construction. (OFC 3309 and 3310.1) BUILDING ACCESS AND FIRE SERVICE FEATURES 9. PREMISE IDENTIFICATION: New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly visible from the street or road fronting the property. The numbers shall contrast with their background. Where required by the fire code official, address numbers shall be required in additional approved locations to facilitate emergency response. Numbers shall be a minimum of 4 inches high with a minimum stroke width of 0.5 inches. If you have questions or need further clarification, please feel free to contact me at(503)259-1504. Sincerely, wo John Wolff Deputy Fire Marshal II Cc:TVF&R File 2 � . RECEIVED CleanWater Services OCT 15 2015 CITY G`F+T GARD PLANNING'ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM Date: October 12, 2015 To: Lina Smith,Assistant P Iity of Tigard From: Jackie Sue HumphreyServices (the District) Subject: Deoca 2-Parcel Partition, MLP2015-00005, IS 125DBO2800 Please include the following comments when writing your conditions of approval: PRIOR TO ANY WORK ON THE SITE AND PARTITION PLAT RECORDING A Clean Water Services (the District) Storm Water Connection Permit Authorization must be obtained prior to plat approval and recordation. Application for the District's Permit Authorization must be in accordance with the requirements of the Design and Construction Standards, Resolution and Order No. 07-20, (or current R&O in effect at time of Engineering plan submittal), and is to include: a. Detailed plans prepared in accordance with Chapter 2, Section 2.04.2.b-1. b. Detailed grading and erosion control plan. An Erosion Control Permit will be required. Area of Disturbance must be clearly identified on submitted construction plans. c. Detailed plans showing each lot within the development having direct access by gravity to public storm and sanitary sewer. d. Provisions for water quality in accordance with the requirements of the above named design standards. Water Quality is required for all new development and redevelopment areas per R&O 07-20, Section 4.05.5, Table 4-1. e. If use of an existing offsite or regional Water Quality Facility is proposed, it must be clearly identified on plans, showing its location, condition, capacity to treat this site and, any additional improvements and/or upgrades that may be needed to utilize that facility. 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway • Hillsboro,Oregon 97123 Phone: (503)681-3600 9 Fax: (503)681-3603 • cleanwaterservices.org f. If private lot LIDA systems proposed, must comply with the current CWS Design and Construction Standards. A private maintenance agreement, for the proposed private lot LIDA systems, needs to be provided to the City for review and acceptance. g. Show all existing and proposed easements on plans. Any required storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water quality related easements must be granted to the City. h. Any proposed offsite construction activities will require an update or amendment to the current Service Provider Letter for this project. CONCLUSION This Land Use Review does not constitute the District's approval of storm or sanitary sewer compliance to the NPDES permit held by the District. The District,prior to issuance of any connection permits, must approve final construction plans and drainage calculations. CED'V OCT 15 2015 n CITY OF"i i1APD REQUEST FOR COMMEN 1 7"ING/ENG►NIERING DATE: October 1. 2015 TO: Per Attached FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Lina Smith,Assistant Planner Phone: (503) 718-2438 Fax: (503) 718-2748 Email: LinaCSktitigard-or.gov MLP2015-00005 - DEOCA PARTITION - REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a Minor Land Partition to divide a 0.38-acre site into two (2) parcels. The subject site is located on SW 74th Avenue,between SW Taylors Ferry Road and SW Shady Lane. Proposed lots will each be 7,502 square feet in size. LOCATION: 9230 SW 74"Avenue;Washington County Tax Map 1S125DB,Tax Lot 2800. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapter 18.420 Attached are the Site Plan and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY.• OCTOBER 15, 2015 You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter or email. Written comments provided below: 100-vw� �elly//.i( Name&Number of Person Commenting: RECEIVED " OCT 0 5 2015 REQUEST FOR COMME�ft j4,:,t .` j� ' G DATE: October 1. 2015 TO: Per Attached FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Lina Smith,Assistant Planner Phone: (503) 718-2438 Fax: (503) 718-2748 Email: LinaCSktitigard-or.gov MLP2015-00005 - DEOCA PARTITION - REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a Minor Land Partition to divide a 0.38-acre site into two (2) parcels. The subject site is located on SW 74th Avenue,between SW Taylors Ferry Road and SW Shady Lane. Proposed lots will each be 7,502 square feet in size. LOCATION: 9230 SW 74`h Avenue;Washington County Tax Map 1S125DB,Tax Lot 2800. ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapter 18.420 Attached are the Site Plan and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: OCTOBER 15, 2015 You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If fou are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter or email. Written comments provided below: Name&Number of Person Commenting: \M scrdo :) Hu Nollv:) i I ON / ,Dtqi'IIVLN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING TIGARD I,Lina Smith,being first duly sworn/affirm,on oath depose and say that I am an Assistant Planner for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below} ® NOTICE OFT ie II Decision FOR: Deoca Partition (MLP2015-00005) ❑ AMENDED NOTICE ® City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit "A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s),marked Exhibit "B",and deposited in the United States Mail on November 19,2015,postage prepaid. Lina Smith STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 93 day of OV f r �Q/� ,2015. CF�FICIAL STAMP �. &FTSY GALICIA NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO-925741 NOTARY PUB IC OF OREGON MY CC, MISSION EY.P RES MARCH 09,2018 / My Commission Expires• ) C7 EXHIBIT"A" Notice of a Type II Decision n Land Partitions Case ID: MLP2015-00005 (Deoca Partition) The Decision Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the requested land use action, subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the Final Decision. The proposal is described below. Tigard Community Development Contact Information Date of Notice: Thursday,November 19,2015 120 days = Friday,January 08,2016 Staff Contact: Lina Smith 503-718-2438 LinaCS@dgard-or.gov Appeal Information All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision may appeal the decision.Appeal forms are available on the city's website or in person at the Permits Center. If you would like to appeal this land use decision,we need to receive your completed appeal form by 4 p.m. on Monday, December 07, 2015. Please include the Case ID Number: MLP2015-00005. Please hand-deliver your completed appeal form (which will be time-stamped) and pay the associated appeal fees at the Permits Center, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please address them to the appropriate staff person noted on this form: Lina Smith and note the Case ID Number: AILP2015-00005. This decision is final on Thursday, November 19, 2015, unless an appeal is filed. The decision will go into effect on Tuesday, December 08, 2015, unless an appeal is filed. A copy of the Final Decision is available upon request from the staff contact person noted above. Information About the Decision Applicant: George Deoca Owner: George&Silka Deoca 9230 Syy'74th Avenue 9230 SNV 74th Avenue Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Description of the Proposal: The applicant is requesting a Minor Land Partition to divide a 0.38-acre site into two (2) parcels. The subject site is located on SW 74th Avenue,between Syy'Taylors Ferry Road and SW Shady Lane. Proposed lots will each be 7,502 square feet in size. Legal 9230 SSV 74th Avenue;WCTM 1S125DB,Tax Lot 2800 Description: Zoning: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District Citi-of Tigard,Community Development Division•13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 pg.1 1/CURPLN/Forms/QJ Staff Report/Notice of Type 11 Decision Templ_08 28 12 It... \� Appeal Procedure Details The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code, which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the City of Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. The deadline for filing an appeal is 4 p.m. on Monday,December 07,2015 Site Map PARTITION PLAT PAMM PUr NO. A N PIAT OF A POWOQk K LOT A,WALT t, AMCOR=AS DOS JIM ■sae an a Tmr .�irse "rxrON�bwNStr�ONpemi ws Aec x mr rxe r.To' ON OF TKNo ftop NO"A NQ t•e�NN okdr f .r.o*rm f W rrw maw„P. m+a em C W�� pyF� FN 'p°1i0^` ry n si eem'rr as qi1 Ne 'M`us 2,9. 1 reArxx rr _x'�^'pyan�ntir R 90P1-ON �� W=wen � � Aarx T r een v r.emee ^^” www xe/ ruse i i � east°r rws ren. NOifS ° er1»xsx tsar enaw.+yeuole Fvaec ia�as k`r rr 4w see���.ar.cr koM Om+ a rNeb xaenr rue ° MWrsa tress areer MtiwkFe�wy\Ya e. ��NPIR er.s,.mw»ewe.eNes ' 1wiM�� ars R w.4M City of Tigard,Community Development Division•13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 pg.2 I/CURPLN/Forms/CU Staff Report/Notice of Type 11 Decision Templ_08 28 12 EXHIBIT"B" ALBERTSON,BARRY 1S125DB11700 15445 SW 150TH_AVE _ANDERSEN,FRENESSIE L TIGARD,OR 97224 7205 SW TAYLOR'S FERRY RD PORTLAND OR 97223 1 S 125DB08100 1 S 125DB05300 1UGEE,JOSHUA L B.V-�RSPUL,BENJA-MIN&JE_-1N-CLAIRE 7155 SW SHADY IN 7225 SW SHADY CT TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 15125AC90009 1S125DB08400 B_1LDERSTON,VVILLLM M B BARRON LIVING TRUST 8960 SNK'73RD PL 7220 SW SH,DY CT PORTLAND OR 97223 PORTL AND OR 97223 BELCH,DAYLE D.&EVELYN O. BEILKE,SUSAN 11530 SW 72ND AVENUE 11755 S\X'114TH PLACE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 BEILSTEIN,ELLEN 1S125DB03001 14630 SW 139TH AVE BEKEY,RONALD TIGARD,OR 97224 9310 SW 74TH_AVE TIGARD OR 97223 1 S 125 AC01603 1 S 125CA 10200 BOEKELOO,ROSALINA E BONDAROXVICZ,\LARION&KAREN L 7075 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD 9242 SNX'75TH.AVE PORTLAND OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1 S 125DB01700 1 S 125AC90001 BOURQUIN,KAARINA C&- MICHAEL J BRANNON,CARL R&CELESTE 7140 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD 7255 SAX'CUSHTNLAN CT TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125AC07500 BRENNET\LkN,HEIDI BREI�L),N,1--INCE S 11680 SW TIGARD DRB'E BREI,L-�N,PAAIELA TRUST TIG_3RD,OR 97223 BY BREI\LIN,1--INCE S&PAMEL_-k K T 9005 SW PIC ASSO PL PORTIu-�ND OR 97223 1 S 125DB03401 1 S 125DB02901 BRICKLEY,BRI_IN DONALD&SANDRA BROV7N,LL-=Y L&TRACY J 7830 SW EL-T\MWOOD ST 9280 SW 74TH.AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIG_-1RD OR 97223 1S125C1A10400 BUEHNER,GRETCHEN BUCKLEY,-,\LARLI E 13249 SW 136TH PLACE 9284 SV'75TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97223 1 S 125DB08300 1 S 125DB04500 BURETA,JODIE A BURTON REVOCABLE TRUST URWYLER,CHARLES BY BURTON,STEVEN J&PATRICIA A TR 7230 SW SHADY CT 7180 Six'TAYLORS FERRY RD TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 CAFFALL,REX 1S125CA03900 13205 SW VILLAGE GLENN C_1LVI,RANDY LEE&KI:\IBERLY TIGARD,OR 97223 9385 SW 74TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97223 CAROL RENAUD-`U CO CPO NEWSLETTER COORD. 1S125CA07100 OSU E',,T.SVC-CITIZEN IN'\'OLVEMENT FACULTY CHAN,LAP TAIL&SIU LING 155 NORTH 1ST AVENUE SUITE 200 MS48 10420 SW BARBUR BLVD HILLSBORO,OR 97124 PORTLAND OR 97219 1 S 125AC01700 1 S 125CA08800 CHENG,MING H CHRISTY,JOSEPH T JR&CORRINE E LO,YALAN 9235 Six'74TH AVE 7095 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD 1S125DB07300 13125 SW HALL BLVD CONLEY,TRACY R TIGARD,OR 97223 7155 SW SHADY CT TIGARD OR 97223 CONNERY,STACY 1S125CA11800 12564 SNX'�&MN STREET CORNYN,JOYCE&JOHN TIGARD,OR 97223 9245 SNv'74TH ANTE PORTLAND OR 97223 CRAGHEAD,ALEXANDER 1S125DB02400 12205 SW HALL BOULEVARD CRAAIPTON,CHERYL R TIGARD,OR 97223-6210 7280 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD TIGARD OR 97223 1S125CA08700 DEFILIPPIS,VICTOR CR-1NDELL,MELANIE J 13892 SW BRAYDON CT 9225 SW 74TH ANTE TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97223 1 S 125BD 14600 1 S 125DB02800 DELAND,ALARA R DEOCA,GEORGE&SILKA 9018 SW 75TH PL 9230 SW 74TH AVE PORTLA,ND OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1 S 125CA 12100 1 S 125DB04800 DURAN,JOSEPH&RACHAEL DUSSCHEE,PAMELA J D 9335 SNX'74TH ANTE 7185 SW SHADY CT TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 "1 1S125CA12500 ENGVALL,ANN EDWARDS,ISAAC S 15461 SW 82 PL 7405 SW CEDARCREST ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 ERDT,DON&DOROTHY 1S125CA10900 13760 SW 121 ST AVENUE FLE-MING,AMY L&KENNETH C TIGARD,OR 97223 9203 SW 75TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 FOSTER,VANESS_1 FROUDE,BEVERLY 13085 SW HOWARD DR 12200 S\ 'BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 GALLUCCI,NAOMI 1S125DB05000 11285 SW 78TH AVENUE GINTHER,SCOTT T&SUSAN E C TIGARD,OR 97223 7205 SNV SHADY CT TIGARD OR 97223 1 S 125CA00200 1 S 125CA07000 GOECKS,TILER CHARLES&DONALD C GOLD,CHARLES B&SHERRI S 11232 S`X'35TH AVE 9024 S\X,'75TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97219 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125ACO2101 GOODHOUSE,JOHN GOLSAN,-fICFLAEL G&JENNIFER K 9345 S\X'\fOUNT_UN VIEW LANE 7395 SW TAILORS FERRY RD TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTI..-kND OR 97224 IS125CA10100 1S125DB12400 HAGER,SCOTT CHRISTOPHER&KATIE HAGGERTY,DANIEL A IV 9218 SW'75TH A�'E BUTLER,LINDSAY N PORTLAND OR 97223 7208 SW TAILORS FERRY RD TIGARD OR 97223 HAMILTON,LISA CPO 4B VICE CHAIR 1S125DB04700 13565 SW BEEF BEND ROAD ILAMILTON,RICHARD F&JUDY E TIGARD,OR 97224 7175 S\X/'SHADY CT TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DB06900 HERDING,TODD&HERING JR,BL-1KE. HANSON,ERIC L NORRIS BEGGS&SIMPSON IIANSON,JOANN 121 SW MORRISON,SUITE 200 7115 SW SHADY CT PORTLAND,OR 97204 TIGARD OR 97223 1 S 125DB 12500 1 S 125CA07600 HAWKINS,BEN W&TANYA M IL11-DEN,LEONARD&DARLENE 7210 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD 9115 SW'75TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DB07800 HOGAN,KEVIN HENDRICKSON,BARRY M AND 14357 S\\'133RD AVENUE KRISTINE E TIGARD,OR 97224 7100 SW SHADY COURT TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DB07100 HOWI.AND,H-AROLD AND RUTH HORVAT,TATJ ANA&NINO 13145 SW BENISH 7135 SW SHADY CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1 S 125DB01500 1 S 125CA00101 JENSEN,LYNN\L\RIE&RYAN KRISTI JESCHKE,\\WILLIAM D&C AROLYN 7100 SW T AYLORS FERRY RD 9145 SW 74TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1 S 125DB 11600 1 S 125CA12300 JOHNSON,KEVIN D& JOHNSON,MICHAEL\X'-ZYNE LORENZEN,BECK—Y A 7415 SW CEDARCREST ST 5858 W 118TH ANTE TIGARD OR 97223 VTSTMINSTER CO 80020 JULIE RUSSELL CHAIR CPO 4B CHAIR JULIE RUSSELL,CPO 4B CHAIR 16200 SW PACIFIC H\\'Y SUITE H BOX 242 12662 SW TERRAVIEW DRIVE TIG_1RD,OR 97224 TIG_1RD,OR 97224 1 S 125BD 14700 1 S 125CA08900 KAISER,CASEY&BRY ANNA KA\L-1\\AL,ABDUL JAMIL&\L-1HBOOBA 9004 SW 75TH PL 2247 SE 30TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97214 1S125CA07500 KEERINS,PATRICIA KAU,\LAR\'IN L 15677 SW OREGON ST.APT 209 9133 SW 75TH AVE TIG_\RD,OR 97140 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125CA12200 KI\L\IEL,D_\\'ID KH\"ILI\'ITZKY,ALEXANDER&N_\T ALY 1335 S\\'66TH SUITE 201 11750 S\\7 TIMBERLINE DR PORTLAND,OR 97225 BEA\'ERTON OR 97008 multiple: 1S125DB02900 to 1S125DB02902 KNAPP,\ION_-\ KING,DELORES A 9600 SW FREWING STREET 9250 SW 74TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1 S 125DB05100 1 S 125DB05400 KOEBER,GEORGE R KOEBER,\L\RY E&ROBERT A 9320 S\\7 74TH_\\'E 7255 SW SIL-1DY LN PORTLAND OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125AC07700 1S125DB11400 KOPETSKI,COLIN KRIEG,KEVIN D 9033 SW PICASSO PL 7109 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD PORTLAND OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125AC07600 1S125CA00301 KROCKER,LINDA K&MIKE LAFAVOR,KEN-IN C&JANELL S 9019 SW PICASSO PL 7410 S\vv'TAYLORS FERRY RD PORTLAND OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1 S 125DB03000 1 S 125DB02500 LEETS,KEISI-LA,D LINCOLN LOAN CO 3895 JAS-MINE DR PO BOX 14652 ALVIN TX 77511 PORTLAND OR 97293 LONG,JIM CHAIR,CPO 4M 1S125DB08500 10730 SW 72ND AVE LORANG,COBY L PORTLAND,OR 97223 �\LARKS,KORINNA C 7210 S\X'SHADY CT TIGARD OR 97223 15125CA 10700 1 S 125CA 10300 T\L-�RSH,CHARLOTTE V'&\IICHAEL B IMRTIN,JIM,fY L&SHERRIE L 9239 SNX'75TH AVE 9260 SNX'75TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1 S 125CA07200 1 S 125CA 11000 NLAZZEO,OLGA E MEADE-OLIVIER,CHRISTY A 9088 SW 75TH AVE OLIVIER,JOSEPH V'JR PORTLAND OR 97223 9181 SV'75TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97223 1 S 125CA11900 1 S 125CA04001 MEECHAN,PATRICK&KATHIE MENGIS,THERESA A 9255 SW 74TH AVE 7655 SW GARDEN HOME RD TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 MILDREN,GENE 1S125CA06800 MILDREN DESIGN GROUP MOFFENBEIER,BRLAN M 7650 SW BEVELAND ST,STE 120 7480 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1 S 125DB04600 1 S 125CA04000 MOSLEM,TYLER&KRISTA MULKERIN,MICHAEL&AMY LIVING T 7190 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD 7410 SAY'CEDARCREST ST TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 MURDOCK,NATLL-�N AND ANN NEAL BROWN.GRI 7415 SW SPRUCE STREET MEADOWS INC REALTORS TIGARD,OR 97223 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA STREET TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 125DB 11800 NEWTH,PATTY NEGRU,ILIE&FIRS 12180 SVG'MERESTONE COURT 7211 SW TAYLOR'S FERRY RD TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125CA09900 1S125CA03400 NOAH,RAY&LINDA ORRIS,JOHN K 9172 S%V'75TH AVE 9205 SW 74TH.AVE TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125C A06900 1S125AC06300 PERONT,_ALLEN B&.ANN P PRINGLE,-IICH SEL J&GWENDOLYN R 7440 SW T_ -YTORS FERRY RD 9024 SVG'PICASSO PL TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1 S 125DB02600 1 S 125DB 12300 RS-T\IUSSEN TRUST REDING,L.-kNNY D&BRENDA S BY RSTT\IUSSEN,MON 1 V TR 9415 SV'74TH_AVE 9130 SW 74TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1 S 125CA 12400 1 S 125DBO8200 ROBERTS,TODD R ROGERS,THO-T\LIS\I AND,\LARY ANN 7411 SSV'CEDARCREST ST 7185 S`X SHADY LANE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125C_110800 ROR L-kN,SUE ROGSON,T MIR P&ASHE_RR-� 11250 SW 82ND AVE 9221 SNV'75TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125CA07300 1S125AC01900 RUSSI,SARA&TRENT RUSTH,,\IILES D 9104 SSV'75TH AVE PO BOX 69407 PORTI- ND OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97239 1 S 125DB 04900 1 S 125AC90011 RY_1LL,TREVOR P&KARYN J SANDERS,LAEL LONI LIVING TRUST 7195 S%X,'SLLADY CT 7250 SV'CUSH,\LAN CT TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125DB04400 1S125C A10000 SARGENT,DAVID SCHEIDT,_ANDREW 7160 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD ST AL-kRIE,JAI-IE TIGARD OR 97223 9194 S\X'75TH_V TE TIGARD OR 97223 1 S 125AC90010 1 S 125DB03200 SCHMIERER,DARRIN`V SCHREIBER 1993 F_ -MILY BY-PASS TR 7270 S%X'CUSH\LAN CT LAROUCHE,PHILIP D&LIS_V M PORTLAND OR 97223 9342 SW 74TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 15125 AC90002 1S125DB11500 SCHUSTER,JEFFREY L SCHUSTER,I\L3RK WILSON 8980 SW 73RD PL 7119 SW T YLORS FERRY RD PORTLAND OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DB03300 1S125DB03400 SETTLE,TERRY&SALLIE A SHIELDS,FRANCES P 9380 S\X'74TH AVE 7305 SV'SH 3DY IN TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125CA10500 1S125CA10600 SILBER,LEAH SNIDER,KATHLEEN ANN KATZ,YEHUD_1 9255 SX'75TH AVE 9279 S\V 75TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97223 PORTI -kND OR 97223 1S125DB07500 SPRING,BRAD SPADAFORA,:\L-M--k KAY&GREG 7555 SW SPRUCE STREET 7180 SW SH_1DT CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 STALZER,CHARLIE AND LARIE 1S125CA12000 14781 S`X'JULIET TERRACE STEEVES,RICHARD H TIG_1RD,OR 97224 HAYASHI,SHARON:\I 7408 S`X'CEDARCREST ST TIGARD OR 97223 1 S 125DB07000 1 S 125DB05200 STINE,THOUS ROGER AND STOLL,LARRY A KARTHAS,CYNTHIA 7215 S\X'SHADY CT 7125 SX'SLL-DY CT TIG_-1RD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 SUNDBERG,ROSS 1S125DB07400 16382 S\X'104TH AVE SWEET,MINOO S TIGARD,OR 97224 7165 SW SHADY CT TIG_1RD OR 97223 15125AC06400 1S125CA07400 TAL-\'ISTE,-MIIHKEL J JR T 3N 1DA,TONY N&WENDY F 9000 SW PICASSO PL 9138 SW 75TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 PORTI--1ND OR 97223 1S125DB01600 THOMPSON,GLENN_ TEHRANI,KAZE-I&DUNE 13676 SXX'HALL BLVD UNIT 2 7120 S\x'TAYLORS FERRY RD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1 S 125DB02700 1 S 125DB07600 TOWNES,M LOUISE F A.--,\IILY TRUST �TENDSHUS,�\L-�RK D&SHARON NI 9210 SW 74TH AVE 7160 S\V SHADY CT TIG_1RD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 WALSH,DAVID WEGENER,BRL-�N 10236 SNX'STUART COURT 9830 SW ISI-IBERLY DRIVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIG_1RD,OR 97224 1 S 125DB07200 1 S 125DB07700 WEINBERG,MICI-L),EL W&I\L1RY E WILL,NIMS,CILkRK N&PEGGY J 7145 SW SMDY CT 7150 SW SFIADY CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIG ARD OR 97223 1 S 125DB07900 YACOB,JARRED Y&SHANN A Al 7090 SXX'SHADY CT TIG_-1RD OR 97223 A AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING I,Lina Smith,being first duly sworn/affirm,on oath depose and say that I am an Assistant Planner for the City of Tigard, Washington County,Oregon and that I served the following: ICheck Appropriate Box(s)Below) ® NOTICE OF Type II Proposal FOR Deoca Partition (MI,P2015-00005) ❑ AMENDED NOTICE ® City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit "A", and by reference made a part hereof,was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s),marked Exhibit "B",and deposited in the United States Mail on October 1,2015,postage prepaid. Lina Smith STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the—L5 day of OLM be-�r- 12015. OFFICIAL STAMP Com„ ncn a BETSY GALICIA NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.925741 NOTARY PUBLIC JF OREGON MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MARCH 09,2018 I � My Commission Expires: t�C ' f 0 EXHIBIT"A" Notice of a Type II Proposal Land Partitions Case ID: MLP2015-00005 Tigard Community Development Contact Information Date of Notice: Thursday,October 01,2015 120 days = Friday,January 08,2016 To: Interested Persons Staff Contact: Lina Smith 503-718-2438 LinaCS@dgard-or.gov If you would like to comment on this proposal, we need to receive your written comments by 5 p.m. on Thursday, October 15, 2015. Please mail or deliver your comments to 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223. Include the Case ID Number: MLP2015-00005. Please address your comments to the appropriate staff person: Lina Smith. Information About the Proposal Description of the Proposal: The applicant is requesting a Minor Land Partition to divide a 0.38-acre site into two (2) parcels. The subject site is located on SW 74h Avenue,between SW Taylors Ferry Road and SW Shady Lane. Proposed lots will each be 7,502 square feet in size. Applicant: George Deoca 9230 SW 74th Avenue Tigard,OR 97223 Owner: George &Silka Deoca 9230 SW 74th Avenue Tigard,OR 97223 Proposal Address: 9230 SW 74th Avenue Legal WCTM 1S125DB,Tax Lot 2800 Description: Zoning: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District Approval Criteria: Community Development Code Chapter 18.420 What You Should Know About This Type II Proposal The proposed development requires a land use review. The goal of this notice is to invite interested parties to participate early in the decision-making process by submitting comments in writing during the open comment period. City of Tigard,Community Development Division•13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 I/CURPLN/Forms/CU Staff Reports/Notice of Type 11 Proposal—Tempi-06-05-12 '*.►' '%� Type II decisions are made by the Community Development Director after consideration of relevant evidence and public comments received during the open comment period. The decision will be mailed to the applicant and to owners of property located within 500 feet of the proposal site and anyone who submitted written comments or is otherwise entitled to a decision notice. The decision maker may: • Approve the proposal. • Approve the proposal with conditions. • Deny the proposal. All evidence considered in the decision will be contained in the public record and available for public review. If you would like to review this material, please schedule an appointment with Lora Garland, Records Management Specialist, 503-718-2483. If you wish to receive copies of the materials, city records will prepare them for you at a reasonable cost. Appeal Information Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Comments directed at the relevant approval criteria (Tigard Development Code) are what constitute relevant evidence. Details regarding the appeal process and requirements are contained within Tigard Development Code Chapter 18.390. There is a fee charged for appeals. Attachments Included in this Notice Zoning and Site Map Notice to Mortgagee, Lienholder,Vendor, or Seller The Tigard Development Code requires that if you receive this notice it shall be promptly forwarded to the purchaser. City of Tigard,Community Development Division•13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 I/CURPLN/Forms/Oj Staff Reports/Notice of Type 11 Proposal_Templ_06-05-12 Site Ma � Ails B IMP ' | ■ § k ■ �q �) § � | `- ! ■ | (@ ! « ■| ^ f | ! �. 2 2� | � � ■ ( , | # � | | | � � /� � � j �`� % 3| a ■ �� | � � § | _ _ \ _!11.m ; §� | a � I ! � | City JTigard,Community Devel7 eDivis6n422SWa±mvd.,wg¢cl %m 9723 waw%n«$Staff Reports/Notice of Type Prp al-T empl-o6o 2 Zoning Ma •� tJ v m m O N a G o = g d LJ L , t U-) _ - Id ObSt Of { s !`0 g50P. 3A'7 HlOt QiP,f� ITT-- ICA W E Iv Id HiSL W '�82l3Fi 75TH AVE L LLIZi F f I rf 0.I~ � � �( � � � ' I •- �._� .�_ City of Tigard,Community Development Division•13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 I/CURPLN/Forms/QJ Staff Reports/Notice of Type 11 Proposal—Tempi-06-05-12 ALBERTSON,BARRY 1S125DB11700 EXHIBIT"B" 15445 SW 150TH AVE ANDERSEN,FRENESSIE L TIGARD,OR 97224 7205 SW TAYLOR'S FERRY RD PORTL--1ND OR 97223 1S125DB08100 1S125DB05300 AUGEE,JOSHUA L BAARSPUL,BENJAMIN&JEAN-CLAIRE 7155 SW SHADY LN 7225 SW SHADY CT TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125AC90009 1S125DB08400 BALDERSTON,WILLIAM B BARRON LIVING TRUST 8960 SW 73RD PL 7220 SW SHADY CT PORTLAND OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 BEACH,DAYLE D.&EVELiN O. BEILKE,SUSAN 11530 SW 72ND AVENUE 11755 SW 114TH PLACE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 BEILSTEIN,ELLEN 1S125DB03001 14630 SW 139TH AVE BEKEY,RONALD TIGARD,OR 97224 9310 SW 74TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 1 S 125AC01603 1 S 125CA 10200 BOEKELOO,ROSALINA E BOND 3ROWICZ,ALARION&KAREN L 7075 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD 9242 SW 75TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1 S 125DB01700 1 S 125AC90001 BOURQUIN,KAARINA C&MICHAEL J BRANNON,CARL R&CELESTE 7140 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD 7255 SW CUSHMAN CT TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125AC07500 BRENNEAIAN,HEIDI BREIMAN,LANCE S 11680 SW TIGARD DRIVE BREII\L-�N,PAMELA TRUST TIGARD,OR 97223 BY BREII\L-�N,LANCE S&PAMELA K T 9005 SW PICASSO PL PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125DB03401 1S125DB02901 BRICKLEY,BRIAN DONALD&SANDRA BROWN,HARRY L&TRACY J 7830 SW ELMWOOD ST 9280 SW 74TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125CA10400 BUEHNER,GRETCHEN BUCKLEY,MARIA E 13249 SW 136TH PLACE 9284 SW 75TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97223 1 S 125DB08300 1 S 125DB04500 BURETA,JODIE A BURTON REVOCABLE TRUST URWYLER,CHARLES BY BURTON,STEVEN J&PATRICIA A TR 7230 SW SHADY CT 7180 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 CAFFALL,REX 1S125CA03900 13205 SW\TILLAGE GLENN CALVI,RANDY LEE&KIMBERLY TIGARD,OR 97223 9385 SW 74TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97223 CAROL RENAUD-WACO CPO NEWSLETTER COORD. 1S125CA07100 OSU EXT.SVC-CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT FACULTY CHAN,LAP TAK&SIU LING 155 NORTH 1ST AVENUE SUITE 200 MS48 10420 SW BARBUR BLVD HILLSBORO,OR 97124 PORTLAND OR 97219 1 S 125AC01700 1 S 125CA08800 CHENG,MING H CHRISTY,JOSEPH T JR&CORRINE E LO,YALAN 9235 SW 74TH AVE 7095 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD 1S125DB07300 13125 SW HALL BLVD CONLEY,TRACY R TIGARD,OR 97223 7155 SW SHADY CT TIGARD OR 97223 CONNERY,STACY 1S125CA11800 12564 SW MAIN STREET CORNYN,JOYCE&JOILN TIGARD,OR 97223 9245 SW 74TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97223 CRAGHEAD,ALEXANDER 1S125DB02400 12205 SW HALL BOULEVARD CRAMPTON,CHERYL R TIGARD,OR 97223-6210 7280 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD TIGARD OR 97223 1S125CA08700 DEFILIPPIS,VICTOR CRANDELL,MELANIE J 13892 SW BRAYDON CT 9225 SW 74TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125BD14600 1S125DB02800 DELAND,ALARA R DEOCA,GEORGE&SILKA 9018 SW 75TH PL 9230 SW 74TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1 S 125CA 12100 1 S 125DB04800 DURAN,JOSEPH&RACHAEL DUSSCHEE,PAMELA J D 9335 SW 74TH AVE 7185 SW SHADY CT TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 .-*N 1S125CA12500 ENGVALL,ANN EDWARDS,ISAAC S 15461 SW 82 PL 7405 SW CEDARCREST ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 ERDT,DON&DOROTHY 1S125CA10900 13760 SW 121ST A17ENUE FLEMING,AMY L&KENNETH C TIGARD,OR 97223 9203 SW 75TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 FOSTER,VANESSA FROUDE,BEVERLY 13085 SW HOWARD DR 12200 SW BULL INIOUNTAIN ROAD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 GALLUCCI,NAONII 1S125DB05000 11285 SW 78TH AVENUE GINTHER,SCOTT T&SUSAN E C TIGARD,OR 97223 7205 SW SHADY CT TIGARD OR 97223 1 S 125CA00200 1 S 125CA07000 GOECKS,TYLER CHARLES&DONALD C GOLD,CHARLES B&SHERRI S 11232 SW 35TH AVE 9024 SW 75TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97219 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125ACO2101 GOODHOUSE,JOHN GOLSAN,MICHAEL G&JENNIFER K 9345 SW MOUNTAIN VIEW LANE 7395 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97224 1 S 125CA 10100 1 S 125DB 12400 HAGER,SCOTT CHRISTOPHER&KATIE HAGGERTY,DANIEL A I-\' 9218 SW 75TH AVE BUTLER,LINDSAY N PORTLAND OR 97223 7208 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD TIGARD OR 97223 HAMILTON,LISA CPO 4B VICE CHAIR 1S125DB04700 13565 SW BEEF BEND ROAD HAMILTON,RICHARD F&JUDY E TIGARD,OR 97224 7175 SW SHADY CT TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DB06900 HARDING,TODD&HERING JR,BLAKE. HANSON,ERIC L NORRIS BEGGS&SIMPSON HANSON,JOANN 121 SW MORRISON,SUITE 200 7115 SW SHADY CT PORTLAND,OR 97204 TIGARD OR 97223 1 S 125DB 12500 1 S 125CA07600 HAWKINS,BEN W&TANYA NI HAYDEN,LEONARD&DARLENE 7210 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD 9115 SW 75TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DB07800 HOGAN,KEVIN HENDRICKSON,BARRY 1\1 AND 14357 SW 133RD AVENUE KRISTINE E TIGARD,OR 97224 7100 SW SHADY COURT TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DB07100 HOWLAND,FL3ROLD AND RUTH HORV AT,TATJANA&NINO 13145 SW BENISH 7135 SW SHADY CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1 S 125DB01500 1 S 125CA00101 JENSEN,LYNN T\L-ME&RYAN KRISTI JESCHKE,WILLIAM D&CAROLYN 7100 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD 9145 SW 74TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DB11600 1S125CA12300 JOHNSON,KEVIN D& JOHNSON,MICHAEL WAYNE LORENZEN,BECKY A 7415 SW CEDARCREST ST 5858 W 118TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 WESTMINSTER CO 80020 JULIE RUSSELL CHAIR CPO 4B CHAIR JULIE RUSSELL,CPO 4B CHAIR 16200 SW PACIFIC HWY SUITE H BOX 242 12662 SW TERRAVIEW DRIVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 1 S 125BD 14700 1 S 125CA08900 KAISER,CASEY&BRYANNA KARL-kWAL,ABDUL JAMIL&T\LIHBOOBA 9004 SW 75TH PL 2247 SE 30TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97214 1S125CA07500 KEERINS,PATRICIA KAU,I -\TIN L 15677 SW OREGON ST.APT 209 9133 SW 75TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97140 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125CA12200 KIMMEL,DAVID KH\TILIVITZI,'Y,ALEXANDER&NATALY 1335 SW 66TH SUITE 201 11750 SW TIMBERLINE DR PORTLAND,OR 97225 BEAVERTON OR 97008 multiple: 1S125DB02900 to 1S125DB02902 KNAPP,MONA KING,DELORES A 9600 SW FREWING STREET 9250 SW 74TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1 S 125DB05100 1 S 125DB05400 KOEBER,GEORGE R KOEBER,MARY E&ROBERT A 9320 SW 74TH AVE 7255 SW SHADY LN PORTLAND OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125AC07700 1S125DB11400 KOPETSKI,COLIN KRIEG,KEVIN D 9033 SW PICASSO PL 7109 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD PORTLAND OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125AC07600 1S125CA00301 KROCKER,LINDA K&MIKE LAFAVOR,KEVIN C&JANELL S 9019 SW PICASSO PL 7410 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD PORTLAND OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1 S 125DB03000 1 S 125DB02500 LEETS,KEISHA D LINCOLN LOAN CO 3895 JAS\LINE DR PO BOX 14652 ALVIN TX 77511 PORTLAND OR 97293 LONG,JI\I CHAIR,CPO 4\1 1S125DB08500 10730 SW 72ND AVE LORANG,COBY L PORTLAND,OR 97223 MARKS,KORINNA C 7210 SW SHADY CT TIGARD OR 97223 1 S 125CA 10700 1 S 125CA 10300 T -1RSH,CHARLOTTE W&�IICHAEL B MARTIN,JIAMfY L&SHERRIE L 9239 SW 75TH AVE 9260 SW 75TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1 S 125CA07200 1 S 125CA 11000 \L-=EO,OLGA E \IEADE-OLIVIER,CHRISTY A 9088 SW 75TH AVE OLIVIER,JOSEPH W JR PORTLAND OR 97223 9181 SW 75TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97223 1 S 125CA 11900 1 S125CA04001 I\fEECH-kN,PATRICK&KATHIE MENGIS,THERESA A 9255 SW 74TH AVE 7655 SW GARDEN HOME RD TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1\11LDREN,GENE 1S125CA06800 \1ILDREN DESIGN GROUP \1OFFENBEIER,BRIAN\I 7650 SW BEYELAND ST,STE 120 7480 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1 S 125DB04600 1 S 125CA04000 \fOSLEY,TYLER&KRISTA \1ULKERIN,\IICHAEL&A\IY LIVING T 7190 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD 7410 SW CEDARCREST ST TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 MURDOCK,NATHAN AND ANN NEAL BROWN.GRI 7415 SW SPRUCE STREET MEADOWS INC REALTORS TIGARD,OR 97223 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA STREET TIGARD,OR 97223 1S125DB11800 NEWTH,PUTTY NEGRU,ILIE&FIRA 12180 SW MERESTONE COURT 7211 SW TAYLOR'S FERRY RD TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1 S 125CA09900 1 S 125CA03400 NOAH,RAY&LINDA ORRIS,JOHN K 9172 SW 75TH AVE 9205 SW 74TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125CA06900 1S125AC06300 PERONT,ALLEN B&ANN P PRINGLE,MICHAEL J&GWENDOLYN R 7440 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD 9024 SW PICASSO PL TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1 S 125DB02600 1 S 125DB 12300 RASMUSSEN TRUST REDING,LANNY D&BRENDA S BY RASMUSSEN,TMONA V TR 9415 SW 74TH AVE 9130 SW 74TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125CA12400 1S125DB08200 ROBERTS,TODD R ROGERS,THOT'\LAS TM AND-,\L-1RY ANN 7411 SW CEDARCREST ST 7185 SW SHADY LANE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125CA10800 ROR'\IAN,SUE ROGSON,TA_MIIR P&ASHEARA 11250 SW 82ND AVE 9221 SW 75TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125CA07300 1S125AC01900 RUSSI,SARA&TRENT RUSTH,MILES D 9104 SW 75TH AVE PO BOX 69407 PORTLAND OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97239 1S125DB04900 15125AC90011 RYALL,TREVOR P&KARYN J SANDERS,LAEL LONI LIVING TRUST 7195 SW SHADY CT 7250 SW CUSHMAN CT TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1 S 125DB04400 1 S 125CA 10000 SARGENT,DAVID SCHEIDT,ANDREW 7160 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD ST T1ARIE,JAIME TIGARD OR 97223 9194 SW 75TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 1S125AC90010 1S125DB03200 SCHMIERER,DARRIN W SCHREIBER 1993 FAMILY BY-PASS TR 7270 SW CUSH'MAN CT LAROUCHE,PHILIP D&LISA IM PORTLAND OR 97223 9342 SW 74TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 1S125AC90002 1S125131311500 SCHUSTER,JEFFREY L SCHUSTER,MARK WILSON 8980 SW 73RD PL 7119 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD PORTLAND OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1 S 125DB03300 1 S 125DB03400 SETTLE,TERRY&SALLIE A SHIELDS,FRANCES P 9380 SW 74TH A\'E 7305 SW SHADY LN TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125CA10500 1S125CA10600 SILBER,LEAH SNIDER,KATHLEEN ANN KATZ,YEHUDA 9255 SW 75TH AVE 9279 SW 75TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125131307500 SPRING,BRAD SPADAFORA,1\L-M-A KAY&GREG 7555 SW SPRUCE STREET 7180 SW SHADY CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 STALZER,CHARLIE AND LARIE 1S125CA12000 14781 SW JULIET TERRACE STEEVES,RICHARD H TIGARD,OR 97224 HAYASHI,SHARON Al 7408 SW CEDARCREST ST TIGARD OR 97223 1 S 125DB07000 1 S 125DB05200 STINE,TH02\L),S ROGER AND STOLL,LARRY A KARTHAS,CYNTHIA 7215 SW SHADY CT 7125 SW SHADY CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 SUNDBERG,ROSS 1S125DB07400 16382 SW 104TH AVE SWEET,AlINOO S TIGARD,OR 97224 7165 SW SHADY CT TIGARD OR 97223 1S125AC06400 1S125C 307400 TALVISTE,XIIHKEL J JR TANADA,TONY N&WENDY F 9000 SW PICASSO PL 9138 SW 75TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125DB01600 THOMPSON,GLENNA TEHRANI,KAZEI\I&DIANE 13676 SW HALL BLVD UNIT 2 7120 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1 S 125DB02700 1 S 125DB07600 TOWNES,1\1 LOUISE FAMILY TRUST VENDSHUS,MARK D&SHARON Af 9210 SW 74TH AVE 7160 SW SHADY CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 WALSH,DAVID WEGENER,BRIAN 10236 SW STUART COURT 9830 SW KIMBERLY DRIVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 1 S 125DB07200 1 S 125DB07700 WEINBERG,MICHAEL W&NLARY E WILLAIMS,CLARK N&PEGGY J 7145 SW SHADY CT 7150 SW SHADY CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DB07900 YACOB,JARRED Y&SHANNA N1 7090 SW SHADY CT TIGARD OR 97223 PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN Project: Deoca COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Case No.: MLP 15-05 Date: Aum 31. `15 GRADING ® Existing and proposed contours shown. ❑ Does proposed grading impact adjacent parcels? No ® Adjacent parcel grades shown. ❑ Geotech report submitted NA STREET ISSUES ® 1 Right-of-way clearly shown. ® Street name(s) shown. ❑ Exist/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown. NA ❑ Street profiles shown. NA ❑ Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo NA on adjacent parcel(s), etc. ❑ Traffic Impact Report NA N Street grades compliant? ® Street widths dimensioned and appropriate? ❑ Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width NA appropriate.? ❑ Other: SANITARY SEWER ISSUES D lir*s shovlm. Show for now lot ❑ Stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? NA WATER ISSUES ® Existing/proposed lines w/sizes noted? As Required by TVWD ® Existing/proposed fire hydrants shown? " ® Proposed meter location and size shown? ❑ Proposed fire protection system shown? NA Other: TVWD SPL provided STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES ® Existing/proposed lines shown? ❑ Prelim. sizing calcs for WQ/detention provided? NA ❑ Water quality/detention facility shown on plans? NA ❑ Facility area matches requirements from talcs? NA ❑ Facility shown outside wetland buffer? NA ❑ Storm stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? NA ftow drlv*"Y Cuhvm a" ❑ Otte Drayage Wong the strut grvic 011 xv--r qr d to provide url*ft tl<'/cW hCommunity Development\Land Use AppliicationslMLP-Minor Land Partitions12015\MLP2015-00005 Deoca Partition 9230 SW 74th Ave 1-S\7_Correspondence12015-8-31 Engineering Completeness Checklist.Docx The submittal is hereby deemed ❑ COMPLETE (Provide information noted above with PFI) ® INCOMPLETE (Resubmit) By: � � Date: Aum 31, `15 hCommunity Development\Land Use Applications\MLP-Minor Land Partitions\201 MMLP2015-00005 Deoca Partition 9230 SW 74th Ave LS\7_Correspondence\2015-8-31 Engineering Completeness CheckNst.Docx RECEIVED SEP 0 3 2015 City of Tigard CITY OF TIGARD � r COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FLANNINt„IENGINEERING Request for 500' Property Owner Notification Property owner information is valid for three(3)months from the date of your request. Contact staff member Joe Patton: 503-718-2714 or joep@tigud-or.gov. Dam R*quest PWOMO& Project name: ID Staff planner you are working with: L f n Ste?1 ( #of sheets cost each sea Pq"WWM Name of contact person: 14.1A r C.0 ('A ia1•eWed $ZOO $ Name of company: GaW'*tis - - >Flt.00 Phone: '5o3 - -2Y—/— VaZ J TOTAL: s Email: LAL+ID>U�j� �PFs Please indicate all map and tax lot numbers that are included #of envelopes cost each seft in your project(ie. 1S134AB00100)or the addresses for all PM"M M project parcels below.If more than one(1)tax lot or if the '6W.500fiw& parcel has no address,you must separately identify each ixWjMd pwtj r 145 X0.13 2 f 37.70 tax lot associated with the project. Gmerao Cut - - - $11.00 SUBI'C?W4 $48.70 per' 145 $0. 49 2 $142.10 TO'A11-- ;190.80 REQUEST only check onel: FIOne (1)set of labels for notification of neighborhood meeting. After submitting,your land use application to the city,die project planner will review your application for completeness and you will be notified by means of a completeness review letter.Please indicate what the completeness letter indicates you need: Land use case number: /1/ G���S'— 00 Type II TWO sets of envelopes F] Type III or Type IV one set of envelopes(a second set may be required if the decision is appealed) The contact person listed above will be notified of the amount to pay at the front counter in the Permit Center once the request is processed.A printed list of all property owners within 500 feet and interested parties will be provided at time of payment.Upon request,a PDF copy is available via email. City of Tigard • 13135 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard,Oregon 97323 • unvw.tigard-or.gov 503-718-2421 • Page 1 of I 1ACUR1'I.N\Mastcrs\5(NN Property(honer Notification Requestdoes Rcti•.20150514 11 FLORENCE LN W Area Notified (500 Ft) Deoca MLP2015-00005 1S125D802800 J — a GN9�E1111_� � 00 n nO ovU n If % TqY ® Subject Site TORS F Notification Area _ R LLJRy RD S•-25©802800 .. .. ._._. __ ._......`. _ .._ •� LU Q Property owner information is valid = for 3 months from the date printed on CE EST ST F- w this map. o > Q LV .. ... ..._ F- LU > LD = Q F n n El n SHADY LN Map Printed:08-Sep-15 CHESTNUT ST / Information on this map is for general local only end should be verKed with lin Development Services Division. V DATA IS DERIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES.THE CITY OF TIGARD MAKES NOT WARRANTY,REPRESENTATION,OR GUARANTEEASTO THE �ONTENT,ACCURACY,TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY OF THE Q DATA PROVIDED HEREIN.THE CITY OF TIGARD SHALL ASSUME NO �. LIS ABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS.OMISSIONS,OR INACCURACIES IN THE INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDLESS OF HOW CAUSED ELM WOOD S - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 'A Place to Call Home" BARBA A LN ee City of Tigard TIGARD Maes 1Tigard,OR 9722325 SW Hall 1d Ow. .,. o aso \ Too 503 639-4171 0-i 0. -a- www.tig.rd-or.gov ALBERTSON,BARRY 1S125DB11700 15445 S\`v'150TH.AVE .ANDERSEN,FRENESSIE L TIGARD,OR 97224 7205 SW TAI'LOR'S FERRY RD PORTLAND OR 97223 1 S 125DB08100 1 S 125DB05300 AUGEE,JOSHUA L BAARSPUL,BENJATMIN&JEAN-CLAIRE 7155 SW SHADY LN 7225 SW SH-DY CT TIG_1RD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 15125AC90009 1S125DB08400 BALDERSTON,WILLIAM B BARRON LIVING TRUST 8960 S\X'73RD PL 7220 S`\'SH\DY CT PORTLAND OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 BEACH,DAYLE D.&EVELYN O. BEILKE,SUSAN 11530 SW 72ND AVENUE 11755 S\'114TH PLACE TIG_\RD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 MILSTEIN,ELLEN 1S125DB03001 14630 S\'139TH AVE BEKEY,RONALD TIGARD,OR 97224 9310 SW 74TH_AVE TIGARD OR 97223 15125AC01603 1S125CA10200 BOEKELOO,ROSALIN_\E BONDAROk\'ICZ,\lARION&KAREN L 7075 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD 9242 SW 75TH_AVE PORTLAND OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1 S 125DB01700 1 S 125AC90001 BOURQUIN,KAARINA C&ZIICH.-�EL J BRANNON,CARL R&CELESTE 7140 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD 7255 SX'CUSH\L\N CT TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 15125AC07500 BRENNE\L\N,HEIDI BREI\L\N,LANCE S 11680 SW TIGARD DRIVE BREI\L-1N,PA\1ELA TRUST TIGARD,OR 97223 BY BREI\L\N,LANCE S&PAMELA,K T 9005 SW PICASSO PL PORTLAND OR 97223 1 S 125DB03401 1 S 125DB02901 BRICKLEY,BRL\N DONALD&SANDRA BROWN,FL\RRY L&TR_1CY J 7830 SW EL\IWOOD ST 9280 SW 74TH ANT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125CA10400 BUEHNER,GRETCHEN BUCKLEY,\L\RL\E 13249 S\\'136TH PLACE 9284 SW 75TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97223 1 S 125DB08300 1 S 125DB04500 BURET.,JODIE A BURTON REVOCABLE TRUST URWA-LER,CHARLES BY BURTON,STEVEN J&PATRICIA A TR 7230 SNX'SHADY CT 7180 SW TA i'LORS FERRY RD TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 C AFFALL,RE- 1 S125CA03900 13205 SWVILLAGE GLENN CALVI,RANDY LEE&KIMBERLY TIGARD,OR 97223 9385 SW'74TH.AVE PORTLAND OR 97223 CAROL RENAUD-W ACO CPO NEWSLETTER COORD. 1S125CA07100 OSU EXT.SVC-CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT FACULTY CH.AN,LAP TAK&SIU LING 155 NORTH 1ST AVENUE SUITE 200 MS48 10420 SW BARBUR BLVD HILLSBORO,OR 97124 PORTLAND OR 97219 15125_ C01700 1S125CA08800 CHENG,:MING H CHRISTY,JOSEPH T JR&CORRINE E LO,YALAN 9235 Ste'74TH AVE 7095 S%X'T_ YLORS FERRY RD TIGARD OR 97223 PORTL.),ND OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD 1S125DB07300 13125 SXV HALL BLVD CONLEY,TRACY R TIG_1RD,OR 97223 7155 SW SI LADY CT TIGARD OR 97223 CONNERY,ST ACY 1 S 125C A 11800 12564 SLS'�lAIN STREET CORN-VN,JOYCE&JOHN TIGARD,OR 97223 9245 SW 74TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97223 CRAGHE),D,ALEXANDER 1 S 125DB02400 12205 SW HALL BOULEVARD CRAMPTON,CHERYL R TIGARD,OR 97223-6210 7280 SW T AYLORS FERRY RD TIGARD OR 97223 1S125CA08700 DEFILIPPIS,VICTOR CRANDELL,TNIELANIE J 13892 SQA'BR-1YDON CT 9225 SW 74TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97223 1 S 125BD 14600 1 S 125DB02800 DEL AND,A -1R-1 R DEOC A,GEORGE&SILKA 9018 SW 75TH PL 9230 S\X'74TH:AVE PORTLAND OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125C A12100 1S125DB04800 DURAN,JOSEPH&RACH.AEL DUSSCHEE,PAMELA J D 9335 SW 74TH_AVE 7185 SW SH.-1DY CT TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125CA12500 ENGV_1LL,ANN EDW.-IRDS,ISAAC S 15461 SW 82 PL 7405 SW CEDARCREST ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 ERDT,DON&DOROTHY 1S125C_110900 13760 SW 121ST AVENUE FLEMING,AMY L&KENNETH C TIGARD,OR 97223 9203 SW 75TH_AVE TIGARD OR 97223 FOSTER,V_XNESSA FROUDE,BEVERLY 13085 SW HOWARD DR 12200 SW BULL MOUNT-1IN ROAD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIG_XRD,OR 97224 GALLUCCI,N 1OII 1S125DB05000 11285 S\X'78TH.AVENUE GINTHER,SCOTT T&SUSAN E C TIG_XRD,OR 97223 7205 SW SH_XDY CT TIGARD OR 97223 1S125CA00200 1S125C_X07000 GOECKS,TYLER CH_XRLES&DONALD C GOLD,CHARLES B&SHERRI S 11232 SW 35TH_AVE 9024 S\X'75TH_AVE PORTLAND OR 97219 PORTLAND OR 97223 15125 1CO2101 GOODHOUSE,JOHN GOLS_XN,-TICHAEL G&JENNIFER K 9345 S\X':MOUNT AIN VIEW LANE 7395 SAX'T )-`LORS FERRY RD TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97224 1 S 125C_X 10100 1 S 125DB 12400 H 1GER,SCOTT CHRISTOPHER&KATIE H_XGGERTY,D_1NIEL A IV 9218 S%X'75TH_AYE BUTLER,LINDSAY N PORTLAND OR 97223 7208 SW T_XYLORS FERRY RD TIG_XRD OR 97223 H1XAIILTON,LISA CPO 4B VICE CHAIR 1S125131304700 13565 SW BEEF BEND ROAD MARLTON,RICH.-1RD F&JUDY E TIGARD,OR 97224 7175 SW SHADY CT TIGARD OR 97223 1S125131306900 HrARDING,TODD&HERING JR,BLAKE. HANSON,ERIC L NORRIS BEGGS&SIIMPSON HANSON,JO ANN 121 SW-TORRISON,SUITE 200 7115 SW SH 1DY CT PORTLAND,OR 97204 TIG_XRD OR 97223 1S125DB12500 1S125C A07600 LLXWKINS,BEN W&TANYA iM HAYDEN,LEONARD&D_XRLENE 7210 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD 9115 SW 75TH.AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIG_XRD OR 97223 1S125DB07800 HOGAN,KEVIN HENDRICKSON,BARRY-i AND 14357 SW 133RD AVENUE KRISTINE E TIGARD,OR 97224 7100 SW SHADY COURT TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DB07100 HOWL_�ND,FL-�ROLD AND RUTH HORVAT,TTJ ANA&NINO 13145 SW BENISH 7135 SW SHADY CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DB01500 1S125CA00101 JENSEN,LYNN;\L-�RIE&RYAN KRISTI JESCHKE,WILLIA-M D&C AROLYN 7100 SW T YLORS FERRY RD 9145 SW 74TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DB11600 1S125C X12300 JOHNSON,KEVIN D& JOHNSON,JIICH 1EL WAYNE LORENZEN,BECK'A 7415 SW CED ARCREST ST 5858 W 118TH -AVE TIGARD OR 97223 W`ESTiINSTER CO 80020 JULIE RUSSELL CHAIR CPO 4B CHAIR JULIE RUSSELL,CPO 4B CHAIR 16200 SW PACIFIC IRY Y SUITE H BOX 242 12662 SNX'TERRAVIEW DRIVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 IS125BD14700 1S125C X08900 KAISER,CASEY&BRY ANNA K11�LkN AL,ABDUL J.MMIL&T\L.HBOOBA 9004 SW 75TH PL 2247 SE 30TH.AVE PORTLAND OR 97223 PORTI kND OR 97214 1S125CA07500 KEERINS,PATRICIA KAU,�L-�RVIN L 15677 SW OREGON ST._SPT 209 9133 SW 75TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97140 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125C A12200 KINITMEL,DAVID KH\-ILIVITZK-Y,ALEXANDER&NATALY 1335 SW 66TH SUITE 201 11750 SW TI'IBERLINE DR PORTLAND,OR 97225 BEAVERTON OR 97008 multiple: 1S125DB02900 to 1S125DB02902 KN SPP,-ION. KING,DELORES A 9600 SW FREWING STREET 9250 SV 74TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1 S 125DB05100 1 S125DB05400 KOEBER,GEORGE R KOEBER,,\LARY E&ROBERT A 9320 SNX'74TH_AVE 7255 SW SHADY LN PORTLAND OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125AC07700 1S125DB11400 KOPETSKI,COLIN KRIEG,KEVIN D 9033 SW PICASSO PL 7109 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD PORTLAND OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125AC07600 1S125CA00301 KROCKER,LINDA K&MIKE LAFAVOR,KEVIN C&JANELL S 9019 SW PICASSO PL 7410 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD PORTLAND OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1 S 125DB03000 1 S 125DB02500 LEETE,KEISHA D LINCOLN LOAN CO 3895 JASMINE DR PO BOX 14652 ALVIN TX 77511 PORTLAND OR 97293 LONG,JIM CHAIR,CPO 4M 1S125DB08500 10730 SW'72ND 1 N'E LORANG,COBY L PORTLAND,OR 97223 �LARKS,KORINNA C 7210 SW SHADY CT TIGARD OR 97223 1 S 125CA l 11700 1 S 125CA 10300 T\LkRSH,CHARLOTTE W&MICHAEL B �LARTIN,JI!\I?\fY L&SHERRIE L 9239 S\X,'75TH AVE 9260 S\X'75TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1 S 125CA07200 1 S 125CA 11000 AIAZZEO,OLGA E AIEADE-OLIVIER,CHRISTY A 9088 S\X'75TH AVE OLIVIER,JOSEPH W JR PORTLAND OR 97223 9181 S\X'75TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97223 1 S 125CA 11900 1 S 125CA04001 AlEECHAN,PATRICK&KATHIE MENGIS,THERESA A 9255 SW 74TH AVE 7655 SW GARDEN HOME RD TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 ARLDREN,GENE 1S125CA06800 MILDREN DESIGN GROUP MOFFENBEIER,BRL1N M 7650 S\X'BEVEL--1ND ST,STE 120 7480 S\X'TAYLORS FERRY RD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1 S 125DB04600 1 S 125CA04000 MOSLEY,TYLER&KRISTA \fULKERIN,MICH-1EL&AMY LIVING T 7190 SNw'TAYLORS FERRY RD 7410 SW CEDARCREST ST TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 MURDOCK,NATLLIN AND ANN NEAL BROWN.GRI 7415 SW SPRUCE STREET MEADOWS INC REALTORS TIGARD,OR 97223 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA STREET TIGARD,OR 97223 1S125DB11800 NEW'I'H,PATTY NEGRU,ILIE&FIRA 12180 SW MERESTONE COURT 7211 SW TAYLOR'S FERRY RD TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1 S125CA09900 1 S125CA03400 NOAH,RAY&LINDA ORRIS,JOHN H 9172 SW 75TH AVE 9205 SW 74TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125CA06900 15125AC06300 PERONT,ALLEN B&ANN P PRINGLE,:MICHAEL J&GWT-NDOLYN R 7440 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD 9024 SW PICASSO PL TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1 S 125DB02600 1 S 125DB 12300 RAS\MUSSEN TRUST REDING,I_-kNNY D&BRENDA S BY RAS_T\IUSSEN,TMONA N'TR 9415 SW 74TH AVE 9130 SNX'74TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1 S125CA 12400 1 S125DB08200 ROBERTS,TODD R ROGERS,THMLkS:AI AND TT\LkRY ANN 7411 SV'CEDARCREST ST 7185 SAX'SHADY LANE TIGARD OR 97223 TIG_1RD OR 97223 1S125CA10800 RORI\LkN,SUE ROGSON,TA-MIR P&ASHEARA 11250 SW 82ND AVE 9221 SW 75TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1 S 125CA07300 1 S 125A C01900 RUSSI,SARA&TRENT RUSTH,\MILES D 9104 SW 75TH A« PO BOX 69407 PORTLAND OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97239 1S125DB04900 1S125AC90011 RYALL,TREVOR P&KARYN J SANDERS,LEL LONI LIVING TRUST 7195 SVI SFLDY CT 7250 SW CUSMLN CT TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1 S 125DB04400 1 S 125CA 10000 SARGENT,DAVID SCHEIDT,ANDRE`' 7160 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD ST'L\UME,J TME TIGARD OR 97223 9194 S\vv'75TH AVE TIG_1RD OR 97223 1S125AC90010 1S125DB03200 SCHMIERER,DARRIN W SCHREIBER 1993 FAMILY BY-PASS TR 7270 SW CUSHl\LN CT LAROUCHE,PHILIP D&LISA M PORTLA,ND OR 97223 9342 SV'74TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 1S125AC90002 1S125DB11500 SCHUSTER,JEFFREY L SCHUSTER,\L-ARK NX71LSON 8980 SW 73RD PL 7119 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD PORTLAND OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1 S 125DB03300 1 S 125DB03400 SETTLE,TERRY&SALLIE A SHIELDS,FRANCES P 9380 SW 74TH AVE 7305 SW SH.-MY IN TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125CA10500 1S125CA10600 SILBER,LEAH SNIDER,KATHLEEN.ANN KATZ,YEHUDA 9255 SNX'75TH AVE 9279 S`X'75TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125DB07500 SPRING,BRAD SPAD_3FORA,ALTRI..-1 I L-�Y&GREG 7555 SW SPRUCE STREET 7180 SW SH-DY CT TIG_1RD,OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 ST.ILZER,CHARLIE AND LARIE 1S125C X12000 14781 SW JULIET TERRACE STEED"ES,RICHARD H TIG_1RD,OR 97224 FIAYASHI,SLIARON Al 7408 SW CEDARCREST ST TIGARD OR 97223 1 S 125DB07000 1 S 125DB05200 STINE,THOT'\L-kS ROGER AND STOLL,LARRY A KARTHAS,CYNTHLA 7215 S\X'SH.-kDY CT 7125 SXV SH-�DY CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 SUNDBERG,ROSS 1S125DB07400 16382 SW 104TH AVE SWEET,AIINOO S TIGARD,OR 97224 7165 SW SHADY CT TIG_1RD OR 97223 1 S 125AC06400 1 S 125CA07400 TALVISTE,MIHKEL J JR TANADA,TONT'N&WENDY F 9000 SW PIC_1SSO PL 9138 S\X'75TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S125DB01600 THOMPSON,GLENN. TEHRANI,KAZETAI&DUNE 13676 SW H.�LL BLVD UNIT 2 7120 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1 S125DB02700 1 S 125DB07600 TOWNES,J1 LOUISE FAMILY TRUST VENDSHUS,�L-1Rh D&SHARON M 9210 SW 74TH_AVE 7160 S`v'SH.-DY CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 ll�w N*... WALSH,DAVID WEGENER,BRLAN 10236 SW STUART COURT 9830 SW KIMBERLY DRIVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIG_1RD,OR 97224 1 S125DB07200 1 S125DB07700 WEINBERG,-MICHI-�EL W&AL-1RY E WILLAIIMS,CLARK N&PEGGY i 7145 SW SH-1DY CT 7150 SW SMDY CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S125DB07900 YACOB,JARRED Y&SFIANN A-i 7090 SV'SfJADY CT TIGARD OR 97223 Land Use Application COMPLETENESS REVIEW REQUEST TO: Greg Berry,Development Engineer RETURN TO: Lina Smith,Assistant Planner DATE SENT: August 18, 2015 REPLY REQUESTED BY: SEPTEMBER 9, 2015 PROJECT NAME: Deoca Partition CASE NUMBER: MLP2015-00005 PROJECT ADDRESS: 9230 SW 74`'Avenue PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting a Minor Land Partition to divide a 0.38- acre site into two (2) parcels. Proposed lots will each be 7,502 square feet in size. Complete? ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments below or❑ See Attached is\curpin\masters\completeness review request.docx City of Tigard 9rcs PO-, IN 4 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 5 D Lj 000087 IC NO 2015 CD/LS 0 MAILED FROM ZIP (,C)DE 97223 1S5DB02700 To ES, M LOUISE FAMILY TRUST 9'7Z,?-3X073 RBTVJM TO PNUL" TO pojtWo' RITMr To J TF: PXAALX To polprAab I City of Tigard 13125SW Hall Blvd. 2% Tigard Oregon 97223 " -� ' w�u . � 2"; i�f � .-Lj CD/LS 1S125CA12200 KHVILIVITZKY,ALEXANDER & NATALY 11750 SW TIMBERLINE DR ucn1712DWAXr nn n,7nno NIXIE 970 DE 1 0012 /11/15 RFTURN TO SENDER NOT DELTVERASLE AS ADDRESSED a UNABLE TO FORWARD 3C: 97223816799 *8329-03299- 19- 43 :'6_ .._ ��tg►!iit��j►��o�`t��il�b��9����'1�����1'�'��t�����1'�°°��� �4�a�a � - ��oes City of Tigard Po s;x 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 0000 87'2 ti(� N 0 V 1 9 201 IT MAILED �P,0i,,A ZEE CIUDE 37223 CD/1,S 1S125CA00200 GOECKS, TYLER C:`ARLES & DONALD C 11232 SW-35TH AVE NIXIE 970 N=P- I RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELIVERABic AS ADDRESSED UNABLE tO FORWARD _ 1 City Of Tigard �,�wfP%' 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd. ' Tigard, Oregon 97223 l'AHILE ) FROM fF . J JE 9, CD/LS CITY OF TIGARD ATTN: CD/LS 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD, OR 97223 4 . _ _.. .:-.. —.r . -.•- F �: 1 11f�I1 t1t��I�}I at 6 #i 1�1Sfl tFt1} Int 41 �r I1#�#t11 t I I ♦r .. .a.-�. - .. ... �....... -.. ♦._ ..r. i _ • _ � _.__.. ... - r. �Y...... ., r. z ./: -. .w.. til.4t /. City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 1 ' Tigard, Oregon 97223 r u. ,fir JJJ, IVWLL D FROM ZIP (-ODE 97223 CD/LS KHVILIVITZKY,ALEXANDER & NATALY 11750 SW TIMBERLINE DR BEAVERTON, OR 97008 NIXIE 970 FE 1 so10j891,1.5 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD s. g979*2238a16799 i :kO229�-054136=61- 4 1111111111111118/]1}1111 if 1111111111111pilijili}i$III] Itllijild City of Tigard � � ---- . 13125 SSV Mall Blvd. � 1d. Tigard, Oregon 9722 V 8 W S 3li Z4 0 J ! :.C 8 r, 'J C CD/LS i � TOWNES, M LOUISE FAMILY TRUST 9210 SW 74TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 NIXIE 970 DE Z eeia/98;/x..5 RETURN TO SENDER F NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD a y 7;yy BC: 97223816799 * 0229#-0{5 32�aa-b".-4 9rr2�+G .BJ7�745 �^re { �4I� 1 it4�1]4�I i }i Ilii y11111li►;1 Ii1 #�iE w3Y 7 B&i� City of Tigard po,% ' 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard Oregon 97223 `. I, MAILED FRO�vl ZIP CODE S;2s_.,' CD/LS CITY OF TIGARD ATTN: CD/LS 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD, OR 97223 .•+.+•. .+. .-... •.w.r..+ �t�il�l ! i}��f } Iflillfi7}f1 � t}till;E7}}I} �d}}{}ii!}} }�! APPLICANT MATERIALS RECEIVED City of Tigard AUG 17 2015 1, CITYOFTIGARD Land Use Permit Application Che fi ��ENGINEERING FOR: DEOCA PARTITION August 12, 2015 APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IN PARTIAL SUBMITTALS. ALL ITEMS MUST BE SUBMITTED AT ONE TIME. ➢ This form is required to complete your submittal. The applicant must check the box next to the item verifying that the information is present. Staff will check off the items at intake. ➢ Three (3) copies of all materials are required for the initial review process The balance of the copies will be requested once your submittal is deemed substantially complete. ➢ Each packet must be collated. ➢ Plans are required to be a minimum of 24"x 36"or 22"x 34". ➢ Plans must be FOLDED,rolled plans are not accepted. Applicant Staff Documents, Copies and Fees Required VCompleted Master "Land Use Permit"Application with property owner's signature or V name of agent and letter of authorization Title transfer instrument or grant deed ✓ Written summary of proposal ✓ Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and j/ approval criteria asspecified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) ✓ Service Provider Letter ✓ Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2(e) ✓ Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes Filin Fee see fee schedule) $3,946.00 Arborist Report Include Arborist's Signature of A proval Maps or Plans Plans must be at least 24"x 36" Ll ✓ Existing Conditions Ma ✓ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan ✓ Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan V i Vicinity Ma (Example.,Goo gle 11Ia s ➢ Once your application has been deemed substantially complete you will be notified by the Planning Division in the form of a completeness letter indicating that you will need to provide envelopes (please see Request for 500'Property Owner Notification form). C:\Users\LinaCS\Desktop\I)eocaSubmittalRequirementsChecklist.docx (updated:04/09/2015) RECEIVED City of Tigard AUG 17 2015 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CIN OF TIGARD = Master Land Use Application PLANNINGJENGlNEERING LAND USE APPLICATION TYPE ❑ Adjustment/Variance (II) XMinor Land Partition(II) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment(IV) ❑ Planned Development(III) ❑ Conditional Use (III) ❑ Sensitive Land Review(II or III) ❑ Development Code Amendment(IV) ❑ Site Development Review(II) D Downtown Design Review(II,III) ❑ Subdivision(II or III) ❑ Historic Overlay (II or III) ❑ Zone Change 011) ❑ Home Occupation(II) ❑ Zone Change Annexation(IV) NOTE:For required submittal elements,please refer to your pre-application conference notes. PROPOSAL SUMMARY (Brief description) 00SScc ( 14a DUB k 1!o AJ QZ 3 0 5W I nP PROPERTY INFORMATION (where proposed activity will occur) Location (address if available): 497-30 S -C4t' - -711A—A Tax maps and tax lot #s: SJa?Mj8ns1 2� Total site size: _CJ� 38 "Jer." Zoning classification: APPLICAN/T�INFORMATION Name: V eot-W [DW C� Case Mailing address: '92-3o G.- /� 7 2Z 3 Apphcation Fee: �— Related Case No.(s): s•Lu - �� �"� — City/state: �"/G,n�t.�i,�� Zip: `7 Phone number: 5-63 - 341 ^ y o?-3 Application accepted: Primary contact name: 1)60 O C q By. Date: Phone number: .application determined com plete- Email: Email: Ply S OLear t S 9 tVNC.t t -CSI" By:__J— Date: 1:\CURKNVMes mU nd Use ApPlimf•ns Rev 11/25/7014 City Of Tigard • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard,Oregon 97223 • www.tigard-or.gov • 503-718-2421 • Page 1 of 2 4 PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER INFORMATION (Attach list if more than one) Name: �r9 e 1- S �[L[� 13�o C of Mailing address: C.J City/state: 'T/ACj,-G>/ 04 '' Zip: Phone: 5.0 j `3 c{/ —VQ 2-7 Email: 9 CdU ea f �,C ef0l--' When the owner and the applicant are different people,the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner.The owners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. THE APPLICANTS) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • If the application is granted,the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan,attachments,and exhibits transmitted herewith,are true;and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued,based on this application,map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire cq6tents of the application,including the policies and criteria,and understands the requirements for apprrning oH, ging the application(s). pplicant's si a Print name Date Applicant/Agent/Representative's signature Print name Date Applicant/Agent/Representative's signature Print name Date SIGN TURES ofof the subject property required Owners a Print name Date Owners signature Print name Date Owner's signature Print name Date Owners signature Print name Date MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard,Oregon 97223 • wwwtigard-or.gov 503-718-2421 • Page 2 of 2 Chicago Title Company ® 10135 SE Sunnyslde Road, Suite 200 Clackamas, Oregon 97015 Phone: 503.786.3940 Fax: 503.653.7833 E-mail: trios@ctt.com METROSCAN PROPERTY PROFILE Washington(OR) OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Owner : Deoca George Parcel Number :R0231065 CoOwner :Silks Deoca Ref Parcel# : 1S125DB 02800 Site Address :9230 SW 74th Ave Tigard 97223 T:01S R:01W S:25 Q:SE QQ:NW Mail Address :9230 SW 74th Ave Tigard Or 97223 Bldg# 1 Of 1 Telephone SALES INFORMATION Transfer Date :04/26/2010 Document# :31180 Sale Price Deed Type : Bargain&Sale %Owned : 100 Vesting Type :Estate By Entire Prior Transfer Date :07/24/1992 Prior Document# :51105 Prior Sales Price :$75,000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION Map Page Grid :655 G1 Mkt Land :$191,760 Census Tract :306.00 Block: 1 Mkt Structure :$156,920 Neighborhood :GHMZ Mkt Total :$348,680 School District :Tigard %Improved :45 Subdivision/Plat:Boulevard Heights M50 Total :$252,360 Class Code : Single Family Res Levy Code :02381 Land Use : 1010 Res,lmproved 13-14 Taxes :$4,249.25 Legal :BOULEVARD HEIGHTS,BLOCK 1,LOT PT Millage Rate : 16.7390 :4,ACRES.38 PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS Bedrooms :4 Lot Acres : .38 Year Built : 1946 Bathrooms :3.00 Lot SgFt : 16,553 EffYearBlt : 1946 HeatMethod:Forced BsmFin SF : Floor Cover:Wood Pool BsmUnfnSF: Foundation :Concrete Fig Appliances :Yes Bldg SgFt :2,135 Roof Shape:Gable Dishwasher: 1 stFlrSF : 1,091 Roof Mad :Composition Hood Fan : UpperFISF : 1,044 InteriorMat :Drywall Deck : Fir,Wlrails Porch SgFt :80 Paving Mag:Concrete GarageType:Attached Attic SgFt Ext Finish :Wood Std Shtg Garage SF :484 Deck SgFt :32 Const Type:Wd Studlshtg This tide information has been furnished,without charge,in conformance with the guidelines approved by the State of OnQw Insurance Commissioner. The Insurance Division cautions intermediaries that this service is designed to benefit the ultimate Insureds. Indiscriminate use only benefiting Intermediaries will not be permitted. Said services may be discontinued. No liability is assumed for any errors in this report. Information is deemed reliable but not guaranteed er: DEOCA. GEORGE & Prop ID R231065 (Real Estate) (599501) DEOCA, SILKA Map Tax Lot: 1S125DB-02800 9230 SW 74TH AVE Legal : BOULEVARD HEIGHTS, BLOCK 1, LOT PT TIGARD, OR 97223 4, ACRES .38 Situs 9230 SW 74TH AVE, Year Built : 1946 Name(s) TIGARD, OR Living Area: 2135 Code Area 023.81 Sale Info 2014 Roll Values Deed Type : DBS RMV Land $ 203,660 (+) Instrument: 2010031180 RMV Improvements $ 188,870 (+) 2014 Tax Status + No Taxes Due ► RMV Total $ 392,530 (_) Current Levied Taxes : 4,319.90 Total Exemptions $ 0 Special Assessments 24.85 M5 Net Value $ 392,530 M50 Assd Value $ 259,930 (1) Alt Disp (AD) (4) Landllmpr (L) (5) Gen Appr (G) (6) Ownership (0) (7) History (H) (. ) More Enter Option from Above or <RET> to Exit: _ 2010-031180 WlY2a14M1TsH Ar 94M fto1 Now 01102010111e 9LM .M N9III M NICER•TMY•p1.M Aftw raeordhly return to:fftm,#A*m,Z*) liltON I III `i'c-rp-'°-"-------------------------------- rMr.�.w.w 92.10 3W 7401 Av! TrwwwN►drH�aw►e"�'wY'r�'• ............................ O�w. •4M1/w�r/wMYN1 TIQMd OR f7.. ..........................:. UMI M"w" tl ah.ewi",@WW a Ux NftIfty rat♦m• �.n...a.ww..o.. 1��,Addne4.ZIP► 9230 STV 74M Aw nQ.ro oR»m SPACE ABOVE RESERVED FOR RECORDER'S USE BARGAIN AND SALE DEED (Individual Grantor) George Decca.Grantor,conveys to George Decca and Sika Deoca,as tenants by the entirety,Grantee, the fo amm descrtied real property: situated in Washirgton County.State of Oregon,W** �9 inning at an iron pipe at the Southeast comer of Lot 4,Tract 1,BOULEVARD HEIGHTS,according to the recorded plat thereof,to the City of Tigard.County of Washington and State of Oregon,and running thence North following the East line of said Lot 4,a distance of 59.96 feet to on Iron pipe:thence Westerly parallel to the South line of Lot 4,aforesaid,278.5 feet,more or less,to a pont on the West line of said Lot 4;then Southerly on the West line of Lot 4,aforesaid,59.96 feet to an iron pipe at the Southwest comer of said Lot 4;thence Easterly 278.5 feet to the place of beginning. MWORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS I STRU9lNT,THE PERSON TRANSFERRING FEF TITLE SHOULD INOUM AOOUT THE MMOWS MOM,M ANY,UNDER ORS 199.3110,199.301 AID ISIJM TO 1911.3211 AND SECTKWU I TO 11,CHAPTM 4b1,OREGON LAWS 2007.THIS 816TTAMENT DOES NOT ALLOW RISE OF THE PROPERTY DF.SCMW IN THIS 91111TRUM!!R IN VKHATIM OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS.BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCMING THIS POTRtN!NT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COW" PLANNING DEPARTYINT TO VERIFY THAT THE UNIT OF LAID a[IHG TRANSFERRED IS A LAWFULLY ESTAILISIM LOT OR PARCEL,AS DEFINED IN ORB 92.019 OR 21LM0,TO VERIFY THE APPROVED USES OF THE LOT OR PARCEL.TO DETEWSHE ANY LISTS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARIINIG OR FOREST PRACTICES,AS DEFILED IN ORS 311./00,AID TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS,IF ANY,UNDER ORS/96.300,199.30/AND IMA011 TO 1911.3311 AND SECTIONS 9 TO 11,CHAPTER 424,OREGON LAWS 21107. The true and &dual consideration for this conveyance is $0.00. (Here,comply with the requirements of ORS 93.030.) Dated this 23rd of 2010. )L,I, /%-� Oeoca SMEAL URC OR NOTARY PNA(/C EGON STATE OF Oregon } V N1O } SS. °=" `a MY 111,tato County of Clackamas } This instrument was acknowledged before me on this 23rd day '010 by George Decca. Before me: Notary Pubic W Oregon My commission expires: May 18,2010 STEWANT TTME reooHds rite document NIS an accomanOdMon only. No liability is assumed or Na30apled ler the condition d we or for to vakft or 91led Of this document. i Title Data, Inc. CH POR10563 WN 2010031160.001 FideNtr NubnMl Tkk Company of Oregon NIM61661"assay 928511@S h' : ^� STATuf011Y*A1111ANTY"10 ` l IIMYWMer GGrr�[rW ........JA .e:.TAIRIS-sad»MAIL"J. ..,,.«.»«..»..............»............................... �_.. — ......._ »».........».... ...... ..»......... ......«../►ante,.,convoys andwarrants to....._.«...._.. .............................. »f$ORCL,CPOCA aq uiiii�dedividwl ».._.....»... .....»......«».............»..._. .»...�_» ...»» «..« »...»......»._ ....».»».»...»».....».................... /ronlee,the/oGouripl dcatMbtd rest property,l►K and deer of eneumbraneea except w apecifiealty Set forth N htretn,a(tuoted in the county of...... _,_••,State of Oregon.to mit: -^ --- -=J+ Degllu►ing at an Leon pipe at the Southeast earner at Lot 4, Twat 1, 900Laym milon4, ` JD according to the recorded plat thereof in Washington county, or*gon, nod canning thspcs au t1' North following the Boat lips of said Lot 4, a tLetaaos of 59.96 teat to an iron pipet i bO then" Masterly Parallel to the South lips of Lot 4, aforesaid, 274.5 feet, once or r1 lass, to a point on the Wast line of Maid Lot 41 thsaoe Southerly on the What line of 5 %J) Lot 4, aforesaid, 59.96 feet to an Iran pipe at the Saw"—at career of said Lot 41 . thenen Masterly 270.5 fest to the Plans of beginning. f' ay.. Subject to.ond.ttapttn/: 1992-1993 woes, a lien not yet doe or Payable. +•. THEE INMUAI4NT WILL NOT ALLOW USI:OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS LV9MuMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATItNIS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT TIIt " PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY �'F+ PLANNING DEPARTMENTTO VERlP'Y APPROVED USES. ,•yrxns THE TRUE AND ACTUAL CONSIDERATION FOR THIS CONVEYANCE IS _ -M_. _.....is:.oils 9a.ow1 WAINNSION f5u5t twawn9tn >nur txh »dr or `! »_._ _ _..19 M Hero ':3•..� Ie NtlwMw.Ne•..Mn. � .:...• w/..1.+.............:.». -���5;, .+u..•*..w...n �t1A1ELLYir J. .,4n;. i`r.. • sTATE OF ONSOON. ) STATS OF ORSoON.C 0"of.................................»....)I6 J ............ . ..,r how dwy MMA. Yw.../N tdsrt/l r,t�a[.9.ON 00W.r.tW W IAM RN•MrN of ��5....... ....ep.tlta.a1 am me nM 6 nr .� yr »..r I�N�,+�� �»:,»..r..•.W.............» ».. ». M���• .»» t[eM1M. �•s ..:.:::. :;OQ. I w I•ne.av hwm• `.+alai w Na.iN.:i r a»i.:a:u�i uwn +N!r u:o[re.tM..[a✓ ,w�fiwM'.•yarSiY�wr am.d Md. d.W oree'otNt ran IMI..N IaNnarw/u.[dt..t d r.4e M hr- l+ AIM of..+e a,(awNiM by wthMNr of la a.Md N tsnnr.:.IW ICA M :.>.. ,.yt•,•'•ti' ��,ice {'� awe ebwv dW MM tmt[wwM"M in vewwwy M"d IM. C _� (OFF4tjI •"�'"�r!" :4^ (OFDIGA6 ...».»._.»....».............»... SEAL) 1 s . fa�D/gsa NM.rr Poblk 14W onaea , :�._ wrrnM oyi,Mr JZ.^ Mr[MwniMlar..pit", MW OF OtIECON t _.: »......t .itrrisxCSS:Sw:.. yd emYcnR� 1l ►dN Gw ........Via._............._ .».» ».... .. I ;. N.st.war au Ex- �. it aBUZ-- ................................. \ i y AllRBYa................................ �L� .•'��r Z::. -- .........ii.5afd...08....91223...................»...............».. CtNiNAl. : M1r[,10Natt t�• Y1n[NNP M+tM.a•I[a M AtM..+•...a M M..M A.M. .00— aR..ahmta.........»._. DOC 3 93051105 ....... ...._............_._...........»._ Ract: 01841 108.00 ........................................................»....... ........ ». 07/34/1992 03153t561PM Pft10'S011 a...c..Nr,..u• ''_.- .. ,_•Its-;":•� • '+�:`''+•1'§g0�''• �7,•1�,}•JI�' Title Data, Inc. CR POR10563 WN 92051105.001 r ' 2600 • ''• \ .31 AC k � •• Uj/ ' �•• r, 2500 •'° J , t .21 AC ••� � ' \ zA54.28 . . o w jQ,e Mn w x. 40 v` 2400 \ > 4 .28 AC 2700 �\ Q .19 AC m 170' CD ' 50.0 m \ , 278.5 M/L m 2800 00 `D .38 AC 278.5 120' J 12 \ \ 2902 .21 AC .2 0 120' 2900�m \ 5 .71 AC N 0 2901 0 > ; 00 ^ .18 AC 8 L Map# : 1S125DB 02800 "This plat is for your aid in locating your land with reference to streets and other parcels. While this plat is believed to be correct,the company assumes no liability for any loss occurring by reason of reliance thereon," CHICAGO TITLE 10135 S.E.SUNNYSIDE ROAD SUITE 200 ® CLACKAMAS, OREGON 97016 1§1 25DB 101 23' P - ny."° Y-iu7 +1 tFtw 'lC[_F-• i, }�\r_.` ..etn.�,:e,at"Y�r. :..S1 l'. V m j i C+., .. 1a 1 b1R rw AIM ;✓,; ` +,x i,., ]7K " vwo irk ). *qJ + r.�l.._.- ,J i r •-1.� 41ii--� MwKO ', yK ', ?,' 931LEY.AAD ,;,, ,100 4, ♦ \ aiY 1000 �4%d »1r}1816}IY S' 2 � aW 2400 '-FEs c 400 Uj Q 7 ttr i ..4r11 •1•z•. �"' - .....Ati. i rr LY -_-._- � 'x��� �! 4� .... i D 400" AD �� •20 �i 4 w P -S + ?' o rK D "3: _._11 t - ��'-" �yi_. _ taa M ! At. - $" I "M 7k' 73w ?w x400 ; rq1' 4i ;e 23ot 123-8t- Of' 21 ''�ci ' f } K r 1.;. -� w( I Mao - t../ x000 II 000 7700 It le 426' _ - ♦3 y—.�r.—. ._.._i }^� .'wt1aKs t1oK0II k r,U ryry•v_; 7400 Y IW i� 1i—-t4s1�__ —_»,�w O .:*s* 00 _ -"Tw ttrr 0 4m wn- 24 0C w 26 3M 0 K. �,yUp�6dis u nK 6 1s - 7,N .4413_ - y 4400 �: 3iitc r..._ ww 4r+ .-&M-.�_,1tllb-_ 1• i w 3x00 $iii ff 4 A,lc j '...carot _ - i uoo I' `7'w - ... N 3u0 �' +„ 1 I"' 1Or � ]iK�,r�."{ f,� ; .1 b,DO r 4000 ii ej „� •�, �3r nig "' n M" eM 'b'°° ba ti 11t7 Rt y mr - -ix- 3101 ,/ 1 (♦7 7 i./- .SLY t� - utoo { lx000 q-_� LANE o e Sw SHADY I u f �+'yr�r' _�cR ar tb.,.,,i,..,...+FdM.,..,..}} f'..,,w•�,.,.,�;..,.�,.,... x'•71 -r---».: . �r" � t � , e •. "�' ON aim ypl►D b wa3'oK0 /7 �° zi CWj yg bx° �{ s3oo � ff0° �' A.baoo i. 34 i.r 00 41W K 00 MoMo3700 i NMD 23- 10700 tx !� tKr fJ r ; 3 ` M� t3 uoo .1 ei STREET; 2 z x °. ,,n_ 4 .,,,__. d wa,__ .S. +t 31K �'. bK x 371: NE 3 ,• .xi „ la .K }. n." i s SW LOLA ►��i ,� °. 1300 a t,.R na7oo ''Y r "i1° � »K Q'+''--ti:�,--+ ws� r';:»� T-w�-?TR yyj�r ,1* N F, r Y f.� 10000 ow r" ...1... ._.' y-w w °e 1- $ N :: 2a I nao ! s3oo i .mo 4i 3�wo aoo ` A& »30K ki Ix to4bob ; J. '""�•) nA i "� tV ti. O f� c fl� r'1 .7 r f VAL , lti '- •^1 lN10r T 211� soS >.., i 3404 2L ]1Kt rK r Map # : 1 S126DB 02800 "This plat is for your aid in locating your land with reference to streets and other parcels. While this plat is believed to be correct,the company assumes no liability for any loss occurring by reason of reliance thereon." CHICAGO TITLE 10135 S.E. SUNNYSIDE ROAD SUITE 200 oe CLACKAMAS,OREGON 97015 RECEIVED August 5 2015 SEP 0 3 2015 CITY 4F TIGARD MANNING/1-ENGINEERING Minor Partition PL 9230 SW 74th. Ave Tigard Or. 97223 Applicant: George Deoca `.•oe Table of Contents 18.390 Decision making/ Impact Study 18.420 Land Partitions 18.420.020 Administration 18.420.030 Approval Process 18.420.040 Application Submission Requirements 18.420.050 Approval Criteria 18.420.060 Final Plat Submission Requirements 18.420.070 City Acceptance of Dedicated Land 18.420.080 Recording Partition Plats 18.510. Res. Zoning Districts 18.510.020 List of Zoning Districts 18.510.030 Uses 18.510.040 Minimum and Maximum Densities 18.510.050 Development Standard 18.705. Access and Egress 18.705.020 Applicability of Provisions 18.705.030 General Provisions 18.715.020 Density Calculation 18.730.020 Exceptions to Building Height Limitations 18.730.030 Zero Lot Line Setback Standards 18.730.040 Additional Setback Requirements Chapter 18.745 landscape and screening ''N 18.745.010 Purpose 18.745.020 Applicability 18.745.030 General Provisions 18.745.040 Street Tree Standards 18.745.050 Buffering and Screening 18.745.060 Re-vegetation Chapter 18.765. Off street parking requirements 18.765.020 Applicability of Provisions 18.765.030 General Provisions 18.765.040 General Design Standards 18.765.050 Bicycle Parking Design Standards 18.765.060 Parking Structure Design Standards 18.765.070 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements 18.765.080 Off-Street Loading Requirements Chapter 18.790 tree removal 18.790.030 Urban Forestry Plan Requirements 18.790.040 Discretionary Urban Forestry Plan Review Option 18.790.050 Flexible Standards for Tree Planting and Preservation 18.790.060 Urban Forestry Plan Implementation Chapter 18.795. Visual clearance areas. 18.795.020 Applicability of Provisions 18.795.030 Visual Clearance Requirements 18.795.040 Computations 18.810.010 Purpose 18.810.020 General Provisions 18.810.030 Streets 18.810.040 Blocks 18.810.050 Easements 18.810.060 Lots 18.810.070 Sidewalks 18.810.080 Public Use Areas 18.810.090 Sanitary Sewers 18.810.100 Storm Drainage 18.810.110 Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways 18.810.120 Utilities 18.810.130 Cash or Bond Required 18.810.140 Monuments—Replacement Required 18.810.150 Installation Prerequisite 18.810.160 Installation Conformation 18.810.170 Plan Check 18.810.180 Notice to City 18.810.190 City Inspection of Improvements 18.810.200 Engineer's Written Certification Required Introduction: General Information. Applicant/Owner George & Silke Deoca 9320 SW 74th. Ave Tigard, Or. 97223 503-341-4023 Arborist: Rob Crouch Community Tree LLC Site Address; 9230 SW 74th. Ave. Tigard Or.97223 Zoning R-4.5 Project area approx. 16969 Sq.ft. Summary Proposal: Applicant request approval for a two parcel partition to be designed and newly constructed partition to be deeded to George and Silke Deoca. Site Description: Applicant proposes construction of one single family home on newly created parcel, Parcel 2 will be a flag lot of approx. 7502 Sq.ft. The existing front parcel has an existing dwelling to remain and will be approx.. 7502 Sq.ft. not counting the reciprocal easement of Sq.ft. for a total of 16969 Sq.ft. The property has 21 trees and will preserve the 4 rear trees on the East end and the front two on the West end. Subject site is in the R 4.5 zoning of 7500 Sq.ft./lot The site slopes slightly from East to West, An Easement for Utilities, Storm and sewer will run on the north side of site to facilities on 74th ave. 18.390.040 Type 11 Procedure A. Pre application conference. A pre application conference is required for Type II actions. Pre application conference requirements and procedures are set forth in 18.390.080.C. B. Application requirements. 1. Application forms. Type II applications shall be made on forms provided by the director as provided by 18.390.080.E.1. 2. Submittal information. The application shall: a. Include the information requested on the application form; b. Address the relevant criteria in sufficient detail for review and action; c. Be accompanied by the required fee; d. Include two sets of pre-stamped and pre-addressed envelopes for all property owners of record as specified in subsection C of this section. The records of the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation are the official records for determining ownership. The applicant shall demonstrate that the most current assessment records have been used to produce the notice list; e. Include an impact study. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet city standards and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the community development code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirements, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Comment: The following impact study will address the public facilities and services this project affects. Impact Study: Addition of 1 single family residence Transportation System: Type 2 Minor Land partition, two parcel partition with access from 74th Ave. Parcel 2 will have a reciprocal easement running approx. 123' along the North, running West to East, Existing drive to be to be brought up to current code. Proposal to build new home in the future on parcel 2, at which time an increase of 1-2 vehicle trips. Drainage System: Storm Water runoff from site drains from the East to West, Via natural over land flow. Proposed development will not change natural drainage pattern. Storm Water to be directed via new piping, gravity fed and directed to 74th Ave. New piping to meet local codes and meet the CWS specifications. Park System: This project is not donating any land to the City of Tigard for open space and parks. Sewer System: Sewer of new parcel 2 to connect to sewer lateral on 74th Ave. using a permanent reciprocal easement along the North side. Parcel 1 to remain on existing sewer connection. Water System : A new water meter to be installed for parcel 2, connecting to lateral on 74th Ave. using a permanent reciprocal easement along the North side. Noise: Proposed development of 1 single family residence should not generate any extraordinary noise that would impact the neighbors. Conclusions: By addressing the above, applicant has demonstrated the above systems meet the impact study requirements listed above. 18.420.020 Administration A. Applicant. The applicant of a partition proposal shall be the recorded owner of the property or an agent authorized in writing by the owner. B. Conformance with state statute. Any application for a land partition shall be in conformity with all state regulations set forth in ORS Chapter 92, Subdivision and Partitions. C. Prohibition on sale of lots. No lot or parcel to be created through the partitioning process shall be sold until approval and filing of the final partition plat. D. Future re-division. When partitioning tracts into large parcels, the director shall require that the parcels be of such size and shape to facilitate future re- partitioning of such parcels in accordance with the requirements of the zoning district and this title. Comment: Applicant of proposed partition is the recorded owner of the property. All state statutes will be observed as they pertain to the partition. Applicant will not sell any of proposed parcels created until the approval and filing of the final partition plat. The configuration of parcels are the size and shape to facilitate the partitioning of the parcels in accordance with the requirements of the zoning district and this title. The application meets this criterion. 18.420.030 Approval Process A. Decision-making process. The director shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an application partition, which shall be reviewed by means of a Type II procedure, as governed by Chapter 18.390, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.420.050. B. Time limit on approval. The partition approval by the director shall be effective for a period of 1-1/2 years from the date of approval. C. Lapsing of approval. The partition or approval by the director shall lapse if: 1. The partition has not been recorded or has been improperly recorded with Washington County without the satisfactory completion of all conditions attached to the approval; 2. The final recording is a departure from the approved plan. D. Extension. 1. The director shall, upon written request by the applicant and payment of the required fee,grant an extension of the approval period not to exceed one year provided that: a. No changes are made on the original plan as approved by the director; b. The applicant can show intent of recording the approved partition or lot line adjustment within the one-year extension period; and c. There have been no changes in the applicable comprehensive plan policies and ordinance provisions on which the approval was based. Comment: Applicant understands that approval of a type 2 minor partition is a decision making process that is approved by the criteria contained in 18.420.50, that there is a 1-1/2 year time limit on the decision, recorded within the limits set by this article recorded with Washington County, and all the satisfactory conditions have been completed or met, Applicant acknowledges that they may file an extension should they deem it necessary so long as they follow the above listed criteria. Applicant meets the criterion 18.420.040 Application Submission Requirements A. General submission requirements. All applications shall be made on forms provided by the director and shall include information required for a Type II application, as governed by Chapter 18.390. B. Specific submission requirements. All applications shall include the preliminary lot line map and necessary information in graphic and/or written form. The director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about these submission requirements. This application contains the submission requirements necessary to comply with type 2 application process as governed in this code section. Applicant meets criterion. 18.420.050 Approval Criteria A. A request to partition land shall meet all of the following criteria: 1. The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations; 2. There are adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposal; 3. All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards; and 4. All proposed lots conform to the specific requirements below: a. The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district. b. The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the access way may not be included in the lot area calculation. c. Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a legally recorded minimum 15-foot wide access easement. d. Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. e. When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. f. A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.745.050. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. g. The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire-fighting capabilities. h. Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot, a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. 5. Any accessway shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress, and Circulation. 6. Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one- hundred-year floodplain, the City shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land are-a-for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. 7. An application for a variance to the standards prescribed in this chapter shall be made in accordance with Chapter 18.370, Variances and Adjustments. The applications for the partition and variance(s)/adjustment(s) will be processed concurrently. Comments: Applicant has prepared application to comply with approval criteria outlined within this code section. 1. Proposed minor partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements. Both lots comply with applicable zoning R4.5 2. The building envelope area of parcel 1 meets the lot requirements of R4.5 3. Parcel 2 to have a 15 foot wide access 10 foot paved running along the north from 74th to parcel2. Easement in reciprocal 4. Setbacks for a flag lot will be observed on parcel 2. Placement of new home will maximize distance between front and rear home. 5. Fire Dept. Marshal Jeff Wolff has reviewed location, access and has given go ahead without any additional requirement or turnaround. Also see attached see letter from TVWD flow test. 6. The access way will comply with the standards set forth in chapter 18.705 Applicant meets this criteria. 18.420.060 Final Plat Submission Requirements A. Submittal. All final plats for partitions shall be accompanied by three copies of the partition plat prepared by a land surveyor or engineer licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. The final plat shall incorporate any conditions of approval imposed by the director as part of the preliminary plat approval. B. Standards. The partition plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05) and by Washington County, as described in detail by information provided by the director at the time of application. Comments: Applicant to comply with final plat submission requirements prepared by a land surveyor or engineer. Final plat to incorporate any conditions of approval imposed by the director as part of the preliminary plat approval. 18.420.070 City Acceptance of Dedicated Land A. Acceptance of dedications by City Engineer. The City Engineer shall accept the proposed right-of way dedication prior to recording a land partition. B. Acceptance of public easements by City Engineer. The City Engineer shall accept all public easements shown for dedication on partition plats. Applicant has prepared site drawings with right of way dedication permanent easement for Parcel 2 to have a 15 foot wide access 10 foot paved running along the north from 74th to parce12. Easement in reciprocal. Applicant has met this criteria. Land Partitions 18.420-4 AP Update: 2/14 18.420.080 Recording Partition Plats A. Recording requirements. Upon the director's approval of the proposed minor partition, the applicant shall record the final partition plat with Washington County and submit a copy of the recorded survey map to the City, to be incorporated into the record. B. Time limit. The applicant shall submit the copy of the recorded minor partition survey map to the City within 15 days of recording, and shall be completed prior to the issuance of any building permits on the re-configured lots. Comments: Applicant to comply with the final plat recording requirements prepared and submit a copy of recorded survey map to the City to be incorporated into the record. Applicant will meet this criteria 18.510 RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS 18.510.020 Property is on R4.5 zoning and both lots meet the minimum 7500 Sq.ft. Lot 1 is 7502 and lot 2 is also 7502Sq.ft. D. R-4.5: low-density residential district. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single- family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. Comment: Proposed partition is on R 4.5 zoning and both lots meet the 7500 Sq.ft. minimum. Lot- 1, 7502Sq.ft. and lot 2, 7502Sq.ft. This criterion is met. 18.510.030 Uses A. Types of uses. For the purposes of this chapter, there are four kinds of use: 1. A permitted (P) use is a use which is permitted outright, but subject to all of the applicable provisions of this title. If a use is not listed as a permitted use, it may be held to be a similar unlisted used under the provisions of Chapter 18.230. 2. A restricted (R) use is permitted outright providing it is in compliance with special requirements, exceptions or restrictions. 3. A conditional use (C) is a use the approval of which is discretionary with the Hearings Officer. The approval process and criteria are set forth in Chapters 18.310 and 18.320. If a use is not listed as a conditional use, it may be held to be a similar unlisted used under the provisions of Chapter 18.230. 4. A prohibited (N) use is one which is not permitted in a zoning district under any circumstances Applicant proposes a single family detached dwelling permitted on R4.5 Zoning. 18.510.040 Minimum and Maximum Densities A. Purpose. The purpose of this section is to establish minimum and maximum densities in each residential zoning district. To ensure the quality and density of development envisioned, the maximum density establishes the ceiling for development in each zoning district based on minimum lot size. To ensure that property develops at or near the density envisioned for the zone, the minimum density for each zoning district has been established at 80% of maximum density. B. Calculating minimum and maximum densities. The calculation of minimum and maximum densities is governed by the formulas in Chapter 18.715, Density Computations. C. Adjustments. Applicants may request an adjustment when, because of the size of the site or other constraint, it is not possible to accommodate the proportional minimum density as required by 18.715.020.0 and still comply with all of the development standards in the underlying zoning district, as contained in Table 18.510.2 below. Such an adjustment may be granted by means of a Type I procedure, as governed by Chapter 18.390, using approval criteria in 18.370.020.C.2. Comments: Minimum and maximum densities are calculated using formulas in 18.715. Applicant is not requesting any adjustments with this application. The density minimums and maximums will be kept. 18.510.050 Development Standards A. Compliance required. All development must comply with: 1. All of the applicable development standards contained in the underlying zoning district, except where the applicant has obtained variances or adjustments in accordance with Chapters 18.370; 2. All other applicable standards and requirements contained in this title. B. Development standards. Development standards in residential zoning districts are contained in Table 18.510.2 Comments: As per Table 18.510.2, both lots are greater than 7500Sq.ft. and meet the minimum width of 50 feet, and meet flag lot set backs of 20' front, 10' sides and 15' rear. Criterion is met. 18.705.020 Applicability of Provisions A. When provisions apply. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures (see Section 18.360.050), and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. B. Change or enlargement of use. Should the owner or occupant of a lot or building change or enlarge the use to which the lot or building is put, thereby increasing access and egress requirements, it is unlawful and is a violation of this title to begin or maintain such altered use until the provisions of this chapter have been met if required or until the appropriate approval authority has approved the change. C. When site design review is not required. Where the provisions of Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, do not apply, the director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an access plan submitted under the provisions of this chapter in conjunction with another permit or land use action. D. Conflict with subdivision requirements. The requirements and standards of this chapter shall not apply where they conflict with the subdivision rules and standards of this title. Comments: Applicant proposing to partition the lots, therefor this section applies. 18.705.030 General Provisions A. Continuing obligation of property owner. The provisions and maintenance of access and egress stipulated in this title are continuing requirements for the use of any structure or parcel of real property in the city. Comment: Each property owner will be responsible for the maintenance of access and egress to their parcel. B. Access plan requirements. No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. Comment: Applicant has submitted a site plan detailing access, and illustrates how access, egress and circulation requirements are met. C. Joint access. Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: 1. Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and 2. Copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the city. Comments: Site Plan shows reciprocal easement for 15' access. Deeds will be filed with the City and County. D. Public street access. All vehicular access and egress as required in 18.705.030.H and I shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the city for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. Comments: Connection to 74th Ave. by 15' Access Easement. E. Curb cuts. Curb cuts shall be in accordance with 18.810.030.N. There is no curb required per Engineer. F. Required walkway location. On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: 1. Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi- building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments. 2. Within all attached housing (except two-family dwellings) and multifamily developments, each residential dwelling shall be connected by walkway to the vehicular parking area, and common open space and recreation facilities. 3. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum six-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum three-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. 4. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, other pervious paving surfaces, etc. Any pervious paving surface must be designed and maintained to remain well-drained. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. Comment: Applicant is proposing a single family dwelling and therefor this section is not applicable. G. Inadequate or hazardous access. 1. Applications for building permits shall be referred to the commission for review when, in the opinion of the director, the access proposed: a. Would cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or b. Would provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles; or c. Would in any other way cause hazardous conditions to exist which would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare. 2. Direct individual access to arterial or collector streets from single-family dwellings and duplex lots shall be discouraged. Direct access to collector or arterial streets shall be considered only if there is no practical alternative way to access the site. If direct access is permitted by the city, the applicant will be required to mitigate for any safety or neighborhood traffic management (NTM) impacts deemed applicable by the city engineer. This may include, but will not be limited to, the construction of a vehicle turnaround on the site to eliminate the need for a vehicle to back out onto the roadway. 3. In no case shall the design of the service drive or drives require or facilitate the backward movement or other maneuvering of a vehicle within a street, other than an alley. Single-family and duplex dwellings are exempt from this requirement. Comments: Comments: The proposed access will not cause hazardous traffic conditions, or be inadequate for emergency vehicles, or present danger to the public. Proposed partition is not on a collector or arterial, but on a neighborhood route and thus this criteria is not applicable. H. Access management. 1. An access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the city and AASHTO (depending on jurisdiction of facility). 2. Driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be 150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from city engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. 3. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. 4. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. Comments: Applicant is proposing a two lot minor partition located on 74th Ave. no streets are proposed within the partition, and there are no driveways to be located on any collector or arterial street, therefor this section does not apply. Minimum access requirements for residential use. 1. Vehicular access and egress for single-family, duplex or attached single-family dwelling units on individual lots and multifamily residential uses shall not be less than as provided in Tables 18.705.1 and 18.705.2 Comments: Applicant is proposing one Single family dwelling, with a 15' access easement, 10' paved thus satisfying the requirements of Table 18.705.1 3. Private residential access drives shall be provided and maintained in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Fire Code. Comments: Proposal of a private residential access drive that will be maintained in accordance with the provisions of the fire uniform code. Driving surface minimum 10' paved and horizontal clearance of 20'. This criteria is met. 4. Access drives in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus by one of the following: a. A circular, paved surface having a minimum turn radius measured from center point to outside edge of 35 feet; b. A hammerhead-configured, paved surface with each leg of the hammerhead having a minimum depth of 40 feet and a minimum width of 20 feet; c. The maximum cross slope of a required turnaround is five percent. Comments: Fire Dept. Marshal Jeff Wolff has reviewed location, access and has given go ahead without any additional requirement or turnaround. Also see attached see letter from TVWD flow test. 5. Vehicle turnouts, (providing a minimum total driveway width of 24 feet for a distance of at least 30 feet), may be required so as to reduce the need for excessive vehicular backing motions in situations where two vehicles traveling in opposite directions meet on driveways in excess of 200 feet in length. 6. Where permitted, minimum width for driveway approaches to arterials or collector streets shall be no less than 20 feet so as to avoid traffic turning from the street having to wait for traffic exiting the site. Comments: Proposed lot with approx.. 123' access easement, therefor section 5 in not applicable, since 74th Ave. is a neighborhood route, not a collector or arterial, sub section 6 does not apply. 18.715.020 Density Calculation A. Definition of net development area. Net development area, in acres, shall be determined by subtracting the following land area(s) from the total site acres: 1. All sensitive land areas: a. Land within the 100-year floodplain, b. Land or slopes exceeding 25%, c. Drainage ways, and d. Wetlands, e. Optional: Significant tree groves or habitat areas, as designated on the City of Tigard "Significant Tree Grove Map" or "Significant Habitat Areas Map"; 2. All land dedicated to the public for park purposes; 3. All land dedicated for public rights-of-way. When actual information is not available, the following formulas may be used: a. Single-family development: allocate 20% of gross acreage, b. Multifamily development: allocate 15% of gross acreage or deduct the actual private drive area; 4. All land proposed for private streets; and 5. A lot of at least the size required by the applicable base zoning district, if an existing dwelling is to remain on the site. Comments: There are no sensitive land areas: Land within the 100-year floodplain, Land or slopes exceeding 25%, Drainage ways, and Wetlands, Parks. The net development area was determined by subtracting the land dedicated to public right of way and the access easement. Total area 16969' minus 120' for Public right of way leaves 16849 Sq.ft.net developable area. B. Calculating maximum number of residential units. To calculate the maximum number of residential units per net acre, divide the number of square feet in the net acres by the minimum number of square feet required for each lot in the applicable zoning district. Comments: Calculation of maximum number of residential units per net acre was calculated dividing the number of square feet in the net acre by the minimum number of square feet required for each lot in the applicable zoning district. Maximum number of res. Units is(16849/7500=2.24), which rounds to 2 parcels. C. Calculating minimum number of residential units. As required by Section 18.510.040, the minimum number of residential units per net acre shall be calculated by multiplying the maximum number of units determined in subsection B of this section by 80% (0.8). (Ord. 12-09 §1; Ord. 09-13) Comments: The minimum number residential units 2.24x .08=1.792 which rounds to 1 unit meeting the City's minimum density requirement. Criteria is met. 18.730.020 Exceptions to Building Height Limitations A. Projections not used for human habitation. Projections such as chimneys, spires, domes, elevator shaft housings, towers excluding TV dish receivers, aerials, flag poles, and other similar objects not used for human occupancy, are not subject to the building height limitations of this title. B. Building height exceptions. Any building located in a non-residential zone may be built to a maximum height of 75 feet; provided: 1. The total floor area of the building does not exceed 1-1/2 times the area of the site; 2. The yard dimensions in each case are equal to at least 1/2 of the building height of the primary structure; and 3. The structure is not abutting a residential zoning district. C. Building heights and flag lots. 1. Limitations on the placement of residential structures on flag lots apply when any of the following exist: a. A flag lot was created prior to April 15, 1985; b. A flag lot is created after April 15, 1985 by an approved partition; or c. A flag lot is created by the approval of a subdivision and the flag lot is located on the periphery of the subdivision so that the lot adjoins other residentially- zoned land. 2. The maximum height for an attached or detached single-family, duplex, or multiple-family residential structure on a flag lot or a lot having sole access from an accessway, private drive or easement is 1-1/2 stories or 25 feet, whichever is less, except that the maximum height may be 2-1/2 stories or 35 feet, whichever is less, provided: Exceptions to Development Standards 18.730-2 AP Update: 2/14 a. The proposed dwelling otherwise complies with the applicable dimensional and height requirements of the zoning district; b. A 10-foot side yard will be preserved; c. A residential structure on any abutting lot either is located 50 feet or more from the nearest point of the subject dwelling, or the residential structure exceeds 1-1/2 stories or 25 feet in height on any abutting lot; and d. Windows 15 feet or more above grade shall not face dwelling unit windows or patios on any abutting lot unless the proposal includes an agreement to plant trees capable of mitigating direct views, or that such trees exist and will be preserved. 3. Where an agreement is made to plant trees capable of mitigating direct views, the agreement shall be deemed a condition of approval under the provisions of 18.390.030.D. 4. The tree planting agreement shall be a condition of Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, for three or more attached units or a multiple-family residential structure, or, at the time of issuance of building permits, for single detached units, one duplex or two attached residential units. (Ord. 09-13) Comment: Proposal for a two parcel minor partition with parcel 2 being considered a flag lot, parcel 2 will fall under the directives of this section. Proposed dwelling to comply with all flag lot requirements, 10 foot side yard, 20 foot front and 15 foot rear set backs, the front of parcel 2 will be determined at the time of building design. The house to the North is approx. 65' from the property line, the house to the East is approx.35' from the rear property line and the house to the South is approx. 40' from the south property line. Parcel 2 will be limited to 2 % stories or 35'. There are large trees on the neighbors properties to the North and South, and our preserved trees on the East that privacy will be maintained for everyone. 18.730.030 Zero Lot Line Setback Standards A. Applicability and limitations. The provisions of this chapter apply to the R-4.5 and R-7 zoning districts and are limited to single-family detached dwelling units. The provisions of this chapter shall be applied in conjunction with: 1. An application for planned development approval under the provisions of Chapter 18.350, Planned Development; 2. An application for subdivision approval under the provisions of Chapter 18.430, Subdivisions; or 3. An application for partitioning approval under the provisions of Chapter 18.420, Partition. B. Approval criteria and conditions. 1. The approval authority shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an application for a zero lot line development based on findings that: a. There shall be a 10-foot separation between each residential dwelling structure or garage; b. No residential dwelling shall be placed on a lot line which is common to a lot line which is not a part of the overall development; c. No structure shall be placed on a lot line which is common to a public or private road right of-way or easement line; and d. A five-foot non-exclusive maintenance easement shall be delineated on the plan for each lot having a zero setback area: i. The easement shall be on the adjacent lot and shall describe the maintenance requirements for the zero lot line wall, or deed restrictions must be submitted with the Exceptions to Development Standards 18.730-3 AP Update: 2/14 Preliminary plat which addresses the maintenance requirements for the zero setback wall of the detached dwellings; and ii. The easement shall be recorded with Washington County and submitted to the city with the recorded final plat prior to the issuance of any building permits within the development. 2. The approval authority requires the following conditions to be satisfied: a. Deed restrictions shall be recorded with Washington County which ensure that: L The 10-foot separation between the residential structures shall remain in perpetuity; and ii. The 10-foot separation between the residential structures shall be maintained free from any obstructions other than: (A) The eaves of the structure, (B) A chimney which may encroach into the setback area by not more than two feet, (C) A swimming pool, (D) Normal landscaping, or (E) A garden wall or fence equipped with a gate for emergency access and maintenance purposes; b. Easements shall be granted where any portion of the structure or architectural feature projects over a property line; and c. The maximum lot coverage for zero lot line shall not exceed the maximum lot coverage for the base zone. C. Application submission requirements. All applications shall be made on forms provided by the director in accordance with Chapter 18.350, Planned Developments, Chapter 18.430, Subdivisions, or Chapter 18.420, Partitions, and shall be accompanied by: 1. Copies of the plat plan indicating building and easement location and dimensions, and necessary data or narrative which explains how the development conforms to the standards; 2. A list of names and addresses of all property owners of record immediately abutting the site; 3. All other requirements of Chapters 18.350, 18.430 and 18.420 shall apply. Comments: Applicant is not applying for a zero lot line set back, this section is not applicable. 18.730.040 Additional Setback Requirements A. Additional setback from roadways. The minimum yard requirement shall be increased in the event a yard abuts a street having a right-of-way width less than required by its functional classification on the city's transportation plan map and, in such case, the setback shall be not less than the setback required by the zone plus 1/2 of the projected road width as shown on the transportation map. Exceptions to Development Standards 18.730-4 AP Update: 2/14 B. Distance between multifamily residential structure and other structures on site. 1. To provide privacy, light, air, and access to the multiple and attached residential dwellings within a development, the following separations shall apply: a. Buildings with windowed walls facing buildings with windowed walls shall have a 25-foot separation; b. Buildings with windowed walls facing buildings with a blank wall shall have a 15-foot separation; c. Buildings with opposing blank walls shall have a 10-foot separation; d. Building separation shall also apply to buildings having projections such as balconies, bay windows and room projections; and e. Buildings with courtyards to maintain separation of opposing walls as listed in subparagraphs a through c of this paragraph 1 for walls in separate buildings. 2. Where buildings exceed a horizontal dimension of 60 feet or exceed 30 feet in height, the minimum wall separation shall be one foot for each 15 feet of building length over 50 feet and two feet for each 10 feet of building height over 30 feet. 3. Driveways, parking lots, and common or public walkways shall maintain the following separation for dwelling units within eight feet of the ground level: a. Driveways and parking lots shall be separated from windowed walls by at least eight feet; walkways running parallel to the face of the structures shall be separated by at least five feet; and b. Driveways and parking lots shall be separated from living room windows by at least 10 feet; walkways running parallel to the face of the structure shall be separated by at least seven feet. C. When no yard setback is required. In zoning districts where a side yard or a rear yard setback is not required, a structure which is not to be built on the property line shall be set back from the property line by a distance in accordance with the state building code requirements. (Ord. 02-33) Comments: This proposal does not require an additional set back because the yard does not abutt a street as required according to City's Transportation map. This criteria is not applicable. 18.745. Landscaping and Screening 18.745.020 Applicability A. Applicability. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development that requires a Type I conditional use minor modification, a Type I site development review minor modification, any Type II land use review or any Type III land use review unless otherwise specified in any of the sections below. B. When urban forestry plan requirements concurrently apply. When the provisions of Chapter 18.790, Urban Forestry Plan, concurrently apply, any trees required by this chapter shall be included in the urban forestry plan and subject to all of the requirements in Chapter 18.790. %N C. Site plan requirements. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. (Ord. 12-09 §1) Comments: This partition creates one lot for single family dwelling, per section 18.360.20, a full landscape plan is not required. Landscaping will be provided when the home is to be constructed, but the specific design will not be determined at this stage of the development. Criteria is met. 18.745.030 General Provisions A. Maintenance responsibility. Unless otherwise provided by the lease agreement, the owner, tenant and his or her agent, if any, shall be jointly and severally responsible for the ongoing maintenance of all landscaping and screening used to meet the requirements of this chapter according to applicable industry standards. Comments: Applicant to be responsible for maintenance of landscape and screening until property is sold, at that time new owner to maintain. B. Installation requirements. The installation of all landscaping and screening required by this chapter shall be as follows: 1. All landscaping and screening shall be installed according to applicable industry standards; Landscaping and Screening 18.745-2 AP Update: 2/14 2. All plants shall be of high grade, and shall meet the size and grading standards of the American Standards for Nursery Stock (ANSI Z60, 1-2004, and any future revisions); and 3. All landscaping and screening shall be installed in accordance with the provisions of this title. Comments: All plants shall be of high grade, and shall meet the size and grading standards of the American Standards for Nursery Stock and be installed in accordance with this title. C. Certificate of occupancy. Certificates of occupancy shall not be issued unless the requirements of this chapter have been met or other arrangements have been made and approved by the city such as the posting of a bond. Comment: Applicant acknowledges Certificate of occupancy will not be issued until the landscape and screening requirements have been met to comply with this section. D. Protection of existing plants. Existing plants on a site shall be protected as follows: 1. The developer shall provide methods for the protection of existing plants to remain during the construction process; 2. The plants to remain shall be noted on the landscape plans (i.e., plants to remain can be shown as protected with fencing); and 3. The tree protection provisions outlined in Chapter 18.790 and the Urban Forestry Manual shall apply to the land use review types identified in Section 18.790.020.A. Comments: Trees numbered 1,2,18,19,20 and 21 will be preserved, and protected with proper fencing. Removal of other trees will have no impact on preserved trees. See urban forest report. E. Ongoing tree-related rules and regulations. Any trees used to meet the requirements of this chapter shall be subject to all applicable tree-related rules and regulations in other chapters and titles of the Tigard Municipal Code and Tigard Development Code. (Ord. 12-09 §1) Applicant acknowledges this requirement, all landscape to conform to standards set in this chapter, Clear vision will be maintained through use of 18" or less shrubs where abutting to the street. This criteria is met. 18.745.040 Street Tree Standards A. Street trees shall be required as part of the approval process for conditional use (Type III), downtown design review (Type II and III), minor land partition (Type II), planned development (Type III), site development review (Type II) and subdivision (Type 11 and III) permits. Comments: There are currently 2 front trees to be preserved as street trees. Criteria is met. B. The minimum number of required street trees shall be determined by dividing the linear amount of street frontage within or adjacent to the site (in feet) by 40 feet. When the result is a fraction, the minimum number of required street trees shall be determined by rounding to the nearest whole number. C. Street trees required by this section shall be planted according to the street tree planting standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. D. Street trees required by this section shall be provided adequate soil volumes according to the street tree soil volume standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. E. Street trees required by this section shall be planted within the right-of-way whenever practicable according to the street tree planting standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. Street trees may be planted no more than six feet from the right-of-way according to the street tree planting standards in the Urban Forestry Manual when planting within the right-of-way is not practicable. F. An existing tree may be used to meet the street tree standards provided that: 1. The largest percentage of the tree trunk immediately above the trunk flare or root buttresses is either within the subject site or within the right-of-way immediately adjacent to the subject site; Landscaping and Screening 18.745-3 AP Update: 2/14 2. The tree would be permitted as a street tree according to the street tree planting and soil volume standards in the Urban Forestry Manual if it were newly planted; and 3. The tree is shown as preserved in the tree preservation and removal site plan (per 18.790.030.A.2), tree canopy cover site plan (per 18.790.030.A.3) and supplemental report (per 18.790.030.A.4) of a concurrent urban forestry plan and is eligible for credit towards the effective tree canopy cover of the site. G. In cases where it is not practicable to provide the minimum number of required street trees, the director may allow the applicant to remit payment into the urban forestry fund for tree planting and early establishment in an amount equivalent to the city's cost to plant and maintain a street tree for three years (per the street tree planting standards in the Urban Forestry Manual) for each tree below the minimum required. (Ord. 12-09 §1; Ord. 09-13) Comments: 2 existing street trees to be preserved and tree fencing for protection. 18.745.050 Buffering and Screening A. General provisions. 1. It is the intent that these requirements shall provide for privacy and protection and reduce or eliminate the adverse impacts of visual or noise pollution at a development site, without unduly interfering with the view from neighboring properties or jeopardizing the safety of pedestrians and vehicles. 2. Buffering and screening is required to reduce the impacts on adjacent uses which are of a different type in accordance with the matrices in this chapter (Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2). The owner of each proposed development is responsible for the installation and effective maintenance of buffering and screening. When different uses would be abutting one another except for separation by a right-of-way, buffering, but not screening, shall be required as specified in the matrix. 3. In lieu of these standards, a detailed buffer area landscaping and screening plan may be submitted for the director's approval as an alternative to the buffer area landscaping and screening standards, provided it affords the same degree of buffering and screening as required by this code. B. Buffering and screening requirements. 1. A buffer consists of an area within a required setback adjacent to a property line and having a depth equal to the amount specified in the buffering and screening matrix and containing a length equal to the length of the property line of the abutting use or uses. 2. A buffer area may only be occupied by utilities, screening, sidewalks and bikeways, and landscaping. No buildings, accessways or parking areas shall be allowed in a buffer area except where an accessway has been approved by the city. 3. A fence, hedge or wall, or any combination of such elements, which are located in any yard is subject to the conditions and requirements of paragraph B.8 and subsection D of this section. 4. The minimum improvements within a buffer area shall consist of combinations for landscaping and screening as specified in Table 18.745.1. In addition, improvements shall meet the following specifications: a. At least one row of trees shall be planted. Trees shall be chosen from any of the tree lists in the Urban Forestry Manual (except the nuisance tree list) unless otherwise approved by the director and have a minimum caliper of 1-1/2 inches for deciduous trees and a minimum height of six feet for evergreen trees at the time of planting. Spacing for trees shall be as follows: i. Small stature or columnar trees shall be spaced no less than 15 feet on center and no greater than 20 feet on center. ii. Medium stature trees shall be spaced no less than 20 feet on center and no greater than 30 feet on center. iii. Large stature trees shall be spaced no less than 30 feet on center and no greater than 40 feet on center. b. In addition, at least 10 five-gallon shrubs or 20 one-gallon shrubs shall be planted for each 1,000 square feet of required buffer area. c. The remaining area shall be planted in lawn or other living ground cover. 5. Where screening is required the following standards shall apply in addition to those required for buffering: a. A hedge of narrow or broad leaf evergreen shrubs shall be planted which will form a fourfoot continuous screen of the height specified in Table 18.745.2 within two years of planting; or b. An earthen berm planted with evergreen plant materials shall be provided which will form a continuous screen of the height specified in Table 18.745.2 within two years. The unplanted portion of the berm shall be planted in lawn or other living ground cover; or c. A fence or wall of the height specified in Table 18.745.2 shall be constructed to provide a continuous sight obscuring screen. 6. Buffering and screening provisions shall be superseded by the vision clearance requirements as set forth in Chapter 18.795. 7. When the use to be screened is downhill from the adjoining zone or use, the prescribed heights of required fences, walls, or landscape screening shall be measured from the actual grade of the adjoining property. In this case, fences and walls may exceed the permitted six-foot height at the discretion of the director as a condition of approval. When the grades are so steep so as to make the installation of walls, fences or landscaping to the required height impractical, a detailed landscape/screening plan shall be submitted for approval. 8. Fences and walls. a. Fences and walls shall be constructed of any materials commonly used in the construction of fences and walls such as wood, stone, rock or brick, or otherwise acceptable by the director; b. Such fence or wall construction shall be in compliance with other city regulations; Landscaping and Screening 18.745-5 AP Update: 2/14 c. Walls shall be a minimum of six inches thick; and d. Chain link fences with slats shall qualify for screening; however, chain link fences without slats shall require the planting of a continuous evergreen hedge to be considered screening. 9. Hedges. a. An evergreen hedge or other dense evergreen landscaping may satisfy a requirement for a sight-obscuring fence where required subject to the height requirement in subparagraphs C.2.a and C.2.b of this section; b. Such hedge or other dense landscaping shall be properly maintained and shall be replaced with another hedge, other dense evergreen landscaping, or a fence when it ceases to serve the purpose of obscuring view; and c. No hedge shall be grown or maintained at a height greater than that permitted by these regulations for a fence or wall in a vision clearance area as set forth in Chapter 18.795. Comments: All adjacent uses to this property are the same Zoning Classification, R 4.5. The buffer matrix states that no additional buffering or screening is required. There is already an existing fence around the property and this will be finished off to meet the screening standards of this chapter alongside the neighbor to the North. C. Setbacks for fences or walls. 1. No fence or wall shall be constructed which exceeds the standards in paragraph 2 of this subsection C except when the approval authority, as a condition of approval, allows that a fence or wall be constructed to a height greater than otherwise permitted to mitigate against potential adverse effects. 2. Fences or walls. a. May not exceed three feet in height in a required front yard along local streets or eight feet in all other locations and, in all other cases, shall meet vision clearance area requirements in Chapter 18.795; b. Are permitted up to six feet in height in front yards adjacent to any designated arterial or collector street. For any fence over three feet in height in the required front yard area, permission shall be subject to administrative review of the location of the fence or wall. 3. All fences or walls shall meet vision clearance area requirements in Chapter 18.795. 4. All fences or walls greater than six feet in height shall be subject to building permit approval. Comments: Applicant does not propose any fences over 8'. Criteria is met. D. Height restrictions. 1. The prescribed heights of required fences, walls or landscaping shall be measured from the actual adjoining level of finished grade, except that where parking, loading, storage or similar areas are located above finished grade, the height of fences, walls or landscaping required to screen such areas or space shall be measured from the level of such improvements. 2. An earthen berm and fence or wall combination shall not exceed the six-foot height limitation for screening. Comments: Applicant does not propose any fences or walls that would exceed the height restrictions in this chapter. Criteria is met. E. Screening: special provisions. Landscaping and Screening 18.745-6 AP Update: 2/14 1. Screening and landscaping of parking and loading areas: a. Screening of parking and loading areas is required. In no cases shall nonconforming screening of parking and loading areas (i.e., nonconforming situation) be permitted to become any less conforming. Nonconforming screening of parking and loading areas shall be brought into conformance with the provisions of this chapter as part of the approval process for conditional use (Type III), downtown design review (Type II and III), planned development (Type lll), and site development review (Type II) permits only. The specifications for this screening are as follows: i. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls and raised planters; ii. Landscape planters may be used to define or screen the appearance of off- street parking areas from the public right-of-way; iii. Materials to be installed should achieve a balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees; iv. All parking areas, including parking spaces and aisles, shall be required to achieve at least 30% tree canopy cover at maturity directly above the parking area in accordance with the parking lot tree canopy standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. 2. Screening of service facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area. 3. Screening of swimming pools. All swimming pools shall be enclosed as required by the state building code. 4. Screening of refuse containers. Except for one- and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be contained within the screened area. Comments: Applicant is not proposing any screening situation that would be required by the provisions of this code. This section is not applicable. F. Buffer matrix. 1. The buffer matrices contained in Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2 shall be used in calculating widths of buffering/screening and required improvements to be installed between proposed uses and abutting uses or zoning districts. 2. An application for a variance to the standards required in Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2, shall be processed as a Type 11 procedure, as regulated by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria in Section 18.370.010. (Ord. 12-09 §1; Ord. 09- 13; Ord. 02-33) Comments: All uses adjacent to this property are of the same zoning, R 4.5 and no additional buffering screening is required. Criteria is met. 18.745.060 Re-vegetation A. When re-vegetation is required. Where natural vegetation has been removed through grading in areas not affected by the landscaping and screening requirements and that are not to be occupied by structures, such areas are to be replanted as set forth in this section to prevent erosion after construction activities are completed. Comments: This application is not proposing grading within the right of way, However if any areas not occupied by a structure get affected by grading they will be re planted to prevent erosion. Criteria is met. B. Preparation for re-vegetation. Topsoil removed from the surface in preparation for grading and construction is to be stored on or near the sites and protected from erosion while grading operations are underway; and 1. Such storage shall be located consistent with an approved urban forestry plan per Chapter 18.790 or outside the tree canopy drip lines of trees intended to be preserved in cases when there is no approved urban forestry plan; and 2. After completion of such grading, the topsoil is to be restored to exposed cut and fill embankments or building pads to provide a suitable base for seeding and planting. Comments: This application is proposing very little grading and any top soil removed will be re-distributed, or stored on site with erosion measures , then re distributed after trenching and building. This criteria is met C. Methods of re-vegetation. Acceptable methods of re-vegetation include hydro- mulching or the planting of rye grass, barley, or other seed with equivalent germination rates, and: 1. Where lawn or turf grass is to be established, lawn grass seed or other appropriate landscape cover is to be sown at not less than four pounds to each 1,000 square feet of land area; 2. Other re-vegetation methods offering equivalent protection may be approved by the approval authority; 3. Plant materials are to be watered at intervals sufficient to ensure survival and growth; and 4. The use of native plant materials is encouraged to reduce irrigation and maintenance demands. (Ord. 12-09 §1) Comments: Applicant to perform any necessary re vegetation above by the standards set forth in this code section. 18.765.020 Applicability of Provisions A. New construction. At the time of the erection of a new structure within any zoning district, off-street vehicle parking will be provided in accordance with Section 18.765.070. Comments: This application is for 1 , 2 lot minor partition for a single family residence, With garage and hard paved surface to meet the standards of this section. Therefor the criteria is met. B. Expansion of existing use. At the time of an enlargement of a structure which increases the on-site vehicle parking requirements, off-street vehicle parking will be provided in accordance with Section 18.765.070 subject to the following: 1. On the date of adoption of this title, the number of vehicle parking and loading spaces required shall be based only on floor area or capacity of such enlargement; 2. If the minimum vehicle parking spaces required for the enlargement added to the existing on-site space exceed the maximum number of vehicle parking spaces allowed for the whole project per the maximum parking ratios established in Section 18.765.070, the applicant may reduce the additional number of spaces provided so that the total spaces on the site do not exceed the maximum spaces allowed. C. Change of use. When an existing structure is changed from one use to another use as listed in Section 18.765.070, the following provisions shall apply: 1. If the parking requirements for each use are the same, no additional vehicle parking shall be required; 2. Where a change results in an intensification of use in terms of the number of vehicle parking spaces required, additional vehicle parking spaces shall be provided in an amount equal to the difference between the number of spaces required for the existing use and the number of spaces required for the more intensive use; 3. Where the change results in a decrease in intensity of use, the applicant may eliminate excess vehicle parking spaces in an amount equal to the difference between the number of spaces required for the existing use and the number of spaces required for the less intensive use. D. When site design review is not required. Where the provisions of Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, do not apply, the director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny a plan submitted under the provisions of this chapter by means of a Type I review, as governed by Section 18.390.030. E. Building permit conditions. The provision and maintenance of off-street vehicle parking and loading spaces are the continuing obligation of the property owner: 1. No building or other permit shall be issued until plans are presented to the director to show that property is and will remain available for exclusive use as off- street vehicle parking and loading space; and 2. The subsequent use of property for which the building permit is issued shall be conditional upon the unqualified continuance and availability of the amount of vehicle parking and loading space required by this title. 3. Required vehicle parking shall: a. Be available for the parking of operable passenger vehicles of residents, patron and employees only; b. Not be used for storage of vehicles or materials or for the parking of trucks used in conduct of the business or use; and c. Not be rented, leased or assigned to any other person or organization. Comments: Application is for a 2 lot, minor partition, leaving existing single family residence, and for future build of a new single family residence on newly created tax lot. Both-homes to have garages and hard paved parking in front of garages. Criteria is met. 18.765.030 General Provisions A. Vehicle parking plan requirements. No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. B. Location of vehicle parking. The location of off-street parking will be as follows: 1. Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single- family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwelling(s). 2. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 500 feet from the property line that they are required to serve, measured along the most direct, publicly accessible pedestrian route from the property line with the following exceptions: a. Commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 500 feet from the primary site; not applicable b. The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: i. Disabled-accessible spaces, Comment: Not proposed/or applicable ii. Short-term spaces Comment: Not proposed/or applicable iii. Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces, Comment: Not proposed/or applicable iv. Long-term spaces. Comments: Not proposed/or applicable C. Joint parking. Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1. The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2. Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3. If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. Comment : Not proposed/or applicable D. Parking in mixed-use and multiple-tenant projects. In commercial mixed-use and multiple-tenant projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula: 1. Primary use, i.e., that with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development, at 100% of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use(s) in Section 18.765.060; 2. Secondary use, i.e., that with the second largest percentage of total floor area within the development, at 85% of the vehicle parking required for that use(s) in Section 18.765.060; 3. Tertiary use at 70% of the vehicle parking required for that use(s) in Section 18.765.060; 4. All other uses at 60% of the vehicle parking required for that use(s) in Section 18.765.060. Comment: Not proposed/or applicable E. Visitor parking in multifamily residential developments. Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spaces shall provide an additional 15% of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. Comment: Not proposed/or applicable F. Preferential long-term carpool/vanpool parking. Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least five percent of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for ca rpools/va n pools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in 18.765.040.N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Comment: Not proposed/or applicable G. Disabled-accessible parking. All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the state building code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. Comment: Not proposed/or applicable H. DEQ indirect source construction permit. All parking lots containing 250 spaces or parking structures containing two or more levels shall require review by the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) to: Comment: Not proposed/or applicable 1. Acquire an indirect source construction permit; Comment: Not proposed/or applicable 2. Investigate the feasibility of installing oil and grease separators. (Ord. 13-07 §1; Ord. 09-13; Ord. 02-13) Comment: Not proposed/or applicable 18.765.040 General Design Standards A. Maintenance of parking areas. All parking lots shall be kept clean and in good repair at all times. Breaks in paved surfaces shall be repaired promptly and broken or splintered wheel stops shall be replaced so that their function will not be impaired. Comment: Not proposed/or applicable B. Access drives. With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: Comments: The access drive for proposed parcel will meet the requirements and standards for a residential standard as described in this code section. Criteria is met 1. Access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; 2. The number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; 3. Access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; 4. Access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; 5. Access drives shall be improved with an asphalt, concrete, or pervious paving surface. Any pervious paving surface must be designed and maintained to remain well-drained; and 6. Excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. Comments: The access drive for dwelling unit will comply with all the standards required for single Family Detached residences as stated within this code section. The criterion is met. H. Parking space surfacing. 1. Except for single-family and duplex residences, and for temporary uses or fleet storage areas as authorized in paragraphs 3 and 4 of this subsection H, all areas used for the parking or storage or maneuvering of any vehicle, boat or trailer shall be improved with asphalt, concrete, or pervious paving surfaces. Any pervious paving surface must be designed and maintained to remain well drained. 2. Off-street parking spaces for single and two-family residences shall be improved with an asphalt, concrete, or pervious paving surface. Any pervious paving surface must be designed and maintained to remain well-drained. Comments: All off street parking will be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface to comply with the standards for single family residences. K. Drainage. Off-street parking and loading areas shall be drained in accordance with specifications approved by the city engineer to ensure that ponds do not occur except for single-family and duplex residences, off-street parking and loading facilities shall be drained to avoid flow of water across public sidewalks. Comments: All off street parking for proposed parcel will be well—drained. Since sidewalks are not being proposed or required, sheet flow will not occur over them. Parcel 2 and it's access way will drain via gravity fed new piping to code, along the North side of property, draining into existing buried storm drain at front on 74th Ave. There is approximately 16" of down slope going from North to South along 74th Ave. The top of the crown is approximately 20 feet to the North of Northwest corner of property. Parcel 1 will continue to be connected to this existing system. This criteria has been met. 18.750 Manufactured/Mobil home Comment: Not Applicable 18.755 Mixed solid waste and recyclables Comment: Not applicable 18.760 Nonconforming situations Comments: not applicable 18.765.050 Bicycle Parking Design Standards According to 18.765.2 Bicycle parking is not required with this application. 18.765.060 Parking Structure Design Standards 11%� 1*1%., Comment: Not applicable 18.765.070 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements A. Parking requirements for unlisted uses. 1. The director may rule that a use, not specifically listed in subsection H of this section, is a use similar to a listed use and that the same parking standards shall apply. If the applicant requests that the director's decision be rendered in writing, it shall constitute a director's interpretation, as governed by Chapter 18.340. 2. The director shall maintain a list of approved unlisted use parking requirements which shall have the same effect as an amendment to this chapter. B. Choice of parking requirements. When a building or use is planned or constructed in such a manner that a choice of parking requirements could be made, the use which requires the greater number of parking spaces shall govern. Comments: Applicant is proposing a two parcel partition for the development of one additional detached single family dwelling, zoning is the same R 4.5.The minimum number of off street parking units is 1 space per dwelling unit as per table 18.765.2. Residential developments do not have a maximum number of off street parking. 18.765.080 Off-Street Loading Requirements A. Off-street loading spaces. Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: This section is not applicable 18.790. Tree Removal 18.790.030 Urban Forestry Plan Requirements A. Urban forestry plan requirements. An urban forestry plan shall: 1. Be coordinated and approved by a landscape architect (the project landscape architect) or a person that is both a certified arborist and tree risk assessor (the project arborist), except for minor land partitions that can demonstrate compliance with effective tree canopy cover and soil volume requirements by planting street trees in open soil volumes only; 2. Meet the tree preservation and removal site plan standards in the Urban Forestry Manual; 3. Meet the tree canopy site plan standards in the Urban Forestry Manual; and 4. Meet the supplemental report standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. B. Tree canopy fee. If the supplemental report demonstrates that the applicable standard percent effective tree canopy cover will not be provided through any combination of tree planting or preservation for the overall development site (excluding streets) or that the 15% effective tree canopy cover will not be provided through any combination of tree planting or preservation for any individual lot or tract in the R-1, R-2, R-3.5, R-4.5 and R-7 districts (when the overall development site meets or exceeds the standard percent effective tree canopy cover), then the applicant shall provide the city a tree canopy fee according to the methodology outlined in the tree canopy fee calculation requirements in the Urban Forestry Manual. C. Tree canopy fee use. Tree canopy fees provided to the city shall be deposited into the urban forestry fund and used as approved by council through a resolution. (Ord. 12-09 §1) Comments: Applicant has prepared a urban forestry plan to comply with this code section. In addition to the tree plan is an arborist report by a certified arborist. 18.790.040 Discretionary Urban Forestry Plan Review Option A. General provisions. In lieu of providing payment of a tree canopy fee when less than the standard effective tree canopy cover will be provided, an applicant may apply for a discretionary urban forestry plan review. The discretionary urban forestry plan review cannot be used to modify an already approved urban forestry plan, any tree preservation or tree planting requirements established as part of another land use review approval, or any tree preservation or tree planting requirements required by another chapter in this title. B. Application procedures. Discretionary urban forestry plan reviews shall be processed through a Type III procedure using approval criteria contained in subsection C of this section. When a discretionary urban forestry plan review is submitted for concurrent Type III land use review with one of the land use review types listed in Section 18.790.020, the review body will be the one designated for the land C. Approval criteria. A discretionary urban forestry plan review application will be approved if the review body finds that the applicant has shown that all of the applicable approval criteria are met: 1. The applicant has demonstrated that the proposed plan will equally or better replace the environmental functions and values that would otherwise be provided through payment of a tree canopy fee in lieu of tree planting or preservation. Preference shall be given to projects that will receive certifications by third parties for various combinations of proposed alternatives such as: a. Techniques that minimize hydrological impacts beyond regulatory requirements such as those detailed in Clean Water Services Low Impact Development Approaches (LIDA) Handbook, including, but not limited to, porous pavement, green roofs, infiltration planters/rain gardens, flow through planters, LIDA swales, vegetated filter strips, vegetated swales, extended dry basins and constructed water quality wetlands; b. Techniques that minimize reliance on fossil fuels and production of greenhouse gases beyond regulatory requirements through the use of energy efficient building technologies and onsite energy production technologies; and c. Techniques that preserve and enhance wildlife habitat beyond regulatory requirements, including, but not limited to, the use of native plant species in landscape design, removal of invasive plant species and restoration of native habitat and preservation of habitat through the use of conservation easements or other protective instruments. D. Decision. The discretionary urban forestry plan review decision shall be incorporated into the land use review decision types in Section 18.790.020. The discretionary urban forestry plan approved in this section shall supersede and replace any conflicting requirements in this chapter; however, all of the non- conflicting requirements in this chapter shall continue to apply. (Ord. 12-09 §1) Comments: Applicants urban forest report will demonstrate above minimum canopy requirements, species, size, area, condition, through a certified arborist report. 18.790.050 Flexible Standards for Tree Planting and Preservation A. General provisions. To assist in the preservation and/or planting of trees and significant tree groves, the director may apply one or more of the following flexible standards as part of the land use review approval. To the extent that the standards in this section conflict with the standards in other sections of this title, the standards in this section shall apply except in cases where the director determines there would be an unreasonable risk to public health, safety, or welfare. Use of the flexible standards shall be requested by the project arborist or landscape architect as part of the land use review process. The flexible standards are only applicable to trees that are eligible for credit towards the effective tree canopy cover of the site. B. Approval criterion for use of flexible standards. The review body may consider modifications for lot dimension standards or site-related development standards as part of the urban forestry plan review process. These modifications are done as part of the urban forestry plan review process and are not required to go through the adjustment process. In order to approve these modifications, the review body must find that the modification request is the least required to preserve and/or plant trees, that the modification will result in the preservation of or an addition to tree canopy on the lot, and that the modification will not impede adequate emergency access to the site. C. Flexible standards to preserve or plant trees. The following flexible standards are available to applicants in order to preserve or plant trees on a development site. 1. Lot size averaging. To preserve existing trees in the development plan for any land partition under Chapter 18.420, lot size may be averaged to allow lots less than the minimum lot size required in the underlying zone as long as the average lot area is not less than that allowed by the underlying zone. No lot area shall be less than 80% of the minimum lot size allowed in the zone. 2. Adjustments to setbacks. The following setback reductions will be allowed for lots preserving existing trees using the criteria in subparagraph a, of this paragraph 2. a. Reductions allowed. i. Front yard. Up to a 25% reduction of the dimensional standard for a front yard setback required in the base zone. Setback of garages may not be reduced by this provision. ii. Other setbacks. Up to a 20% reduction of the dimensional standards for other setbacks required in the base zone. 3. Adjustments to sidewalks. Location of a public sidewalk may be flexible in order to preserve existing trees or to plant new large stature street trees. Sidewalk location and design must be approved by the development engineer. For preservation, this flexibility shall be the minimum required to achieve the desired effect. For planting, preference shall be given to retaining the planter strip and separation between the curb and sidewalk wherever practicable. If a preserved tree is to be utilized as a street tree, it must meet the criteria found in the landscaping and screening Section 18.745.040.F. 4. Adjustments to commercial/industrial/civic use parking. For each two percent of effective canopy cover provided by preserved or planted trees incorporated into a development plan for commercial, industrial or civic uses listed in Section 18.765.080, Minimum and Maximum OffStreet Parking Requirements, a one percent reduction in the amount of required parking may be granted. No more than a 20% reduction in the required amount of parking may be granted for any one development. Not applicable 5. Adjustments to commercial/industrial/civic use landscaping. For each two percent of effective canopy cover provided by preserved trees incorporated into a development plan, a one percent reduction in the minimum landscape requirement may be granted. No more than 20% of the minimum landscape requirement may be reduced for any one development. Comment: Not applicable D. Flexible standards and incentives for the preservation of significant tree groves. A significant tree grove map is maintained by the director. The following additional flexible standards and incentives are available when a development site contains at least 10,000 square feet of tree canopy that is part of a significant tree grove and is not also within sensitive lands identified in 18.775.010.G.1 through 3. If any of these flexible standards and incentives are requested, the project arborist or landscape architect shall clearly demonstrate in the urban forestry plan consistency with the following provisions: 1. Reduction of minimum density. The minimum density required by 18.510.040.6 may be reduced to preserve a significant tree grove. The amount of reduction in minimum density shall be. Applicant is not proposing preservation of a tree grove, Not applicable. 18.790 Tree Removal a. Reduction of minimum density is permitted provided that: a. At least 50% of the significant tree grove's canopy within the development site (and not also within the sensitive lands types in 18.775.010.G.1 through 3) is preserved; b. The project arborist or landscape architect certifies the preservation is such that the connectivity and viability of the remaining significant tree grove is maximized while balancing the significant tree grove preservation considerations in the Urban Forestry Manual; and c. The significant tree grove is protected through an instrument or action subject to approval by the director that demonstrates it will be permanently preserved such as: L A conservation easement; ii. An open space tract; iii. A deed restriction; or iv. Through dedication and acceptance by the city. 2. Residential density transfer. Up to 100% density transfer is permitted from the preserved portion of a significant tree grove within a development site to the buildable area of the development site. a. Density may be transferred provided that: L The standards in Table 18.790.1 are met with the preservation of the corresponding percent of the significant tree grove's canopy within the development site (and not also within the sensitive lands types in 18.775.010.G.1 through 3); ii. The project arborist or landscape architect certifies the preservation is such that the connectivity and viability of the remaining significant tree grove is maximized while balancing the significant tree grove preservation considerations in the Urban Forestry Manual; iii. Maximum density for the net site area including the significant tree grove is not exceeded; and iv. The significant tree grove is protected through an instrument or action subject to approval by the director that demonstrates it will be permanently preserved such as: (A) A conservation easement, (B) An open space tract, (C) A deed restriction, or (D) Through dedication and acceptance by the city. Urban Forestry Plan 18.790-6 AP Update: 2/14 b. The proposed development may include the following: L Zero lot line single-family detached housing for the portion of the development site that receives the density transfer. ii. The following variations from the base zone development standards are permitted: (A) Up to 25% reduction of average minimum lot width; (B) Up to 10-foot minimum front yard setback; _011N (C) Up to 33% reduction of side and rear yard setbacks; (D) Up to four-foot minimum garage setback; and (E) Up to 20% increase in maximum height as long as height adjustments comply with the International Building Code. iii. When the portion of the development site that receives the density transfer abuts a developed residential district with the same or lower density zoning, the average area of abutting perimeter lots shall at least be 75% or greater than the corresponding minimum lot area of the base residential zoning district. Comment: Applicant is not proposing preservation of a tree grove, not applicable. 18.795 Visual clearance areas. 18.795.020 Applicability of Provisions A. When provisions apply. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. B. When site development review is not required. Where the provisions of Chapter 18.330, Site Development Review, do not apply, the director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny a plan submitted under the provisions of this chapter through a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030, using the standards in this chapter as approval criteria. Comment: Proposal of a two parcel partition. All vision clearance provisions of this code-section will be met. Therefor this code section has been met. 18.795.030 Visual Clearance Requirements A. At corners. Except within the CBD zoning district a visual clearance area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to the intersection of two streets, a street and a railroad, or a driveway providing access to a public or private street. B. Obstructions prohibited. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an occasional utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. C. Additional topographical constraints. Where the crest of a hill or vertical curve conditions contribute to the obstruction of clear vision areas at a street or driveway intersection, hedges, plantings, fences, walls, wall structures and temporary or permanent obstructions shall be further reduced in height or eliminated to comply with the intent of the required clear vision area. Comment: Proposed access way to parcel 2 is not located at a corner and there are no additional topographical constraints that impair vision clearance triangle. The applicant will keep clear vision standards by keeping all plants and fences/ below 3 feet. The criteria is met. 18.795.040 Computations A. Arterial streets. On all designated arterial streets the visual clearance area shall not be less than 35 feet on each side of the intersection. Not applicable. B. Non-arterial streets. 1. Non-arterial streets 24 feet or more in width. At all intersections of two non- arterial streets, a non-arterial street and a driveway, and a non-arterial street or driveway and railroad where at least one of the streets or driveways is 24 feet or more in width, a visual clearance area shall be a triangle formed by the right-of- way or property lines along such lots and a straight line joining the right of-way or property line at points which are 30 feet distance from the intersection of the right-of way line and measured along such lines. See Figure 18.795.1: Figure 18.795.1 Illustrations of Visual Clearance Requirements 2. Non-arterial streets less than 24 feet in width. At all intersections of two non- arterial streets, a non-arterial street and a driveway, and a non-arterial street or driveway and railroad where both streets and/or driveways are less than 24 feet in width, a visual clearance area shall be a triangle whose base extends 30 feet along the street right-of-way line in both directions from the centerline of the access way at the front setback line of a single-family and two-family residence, and 30 feet back from the property line on all other types of uses. 18.810.020 General Provisions A. When standards apply. Unless otherwise provided, construction, reconstruction or repair of streets, sidewalks, curbs and other public improvements shall occur in accordance with the standards of this title. No development may occur and no land use application may be approved unless the public facilities related to development comply with the public facility requirements established in this section and adequate public facilities are available. Applicants may be required to dedicate land and build required public improvements only when the required exaction is directly related to and roughly proportional to the impact of the development. B. Standard specifications. The city engineer shall establish standard specifications consistent with the application of engineering principles. C. Chapter 7.40 applies. The provision of Chapter 7.40 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply to this chapter. D. Adjustments. Adjustments to the provisions in this chapter related to street improvements may be granted by means of a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria in 18.370.020.C.11. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810-2 AP Update: 2/14 E. Except as provided in 18.810.030.S, as used in this chapter, the term "streets" shall mean "public streets" unless an adjustment under subsection D of this section is allowed. (Ord. 12-13 §1; Ord. 99-22) Comment: Applicant has prepared a two parcel application in compliance with the requirements of this section. The applicant understands City Engineer requires a total of 27 feet from centerline on 74th Ave. A two foot dedication has been made on plot maps. This criterion is met. 18.810.030 Streets A. Improvements. 1. No development shall occur unless the development has frontage or approved access to a public street. 2. No development shall occur unless streets within the development meet the standards of this chapter. 3. No development shall occur unless the streets adjacent to the development meet the standards of this chapter, provided, however, that a development may be approved if the adjacent street does not meet the standards but half-street improvements meeting the standards of this title are constructed adjacent to the development. 4. Any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall meet the standards of this chapter. 5. If the city could and would otherwise require the applicant to provide street improvements, the city engineer may accept a future improvements guarantee in lieu of street improvements if one or more of the following conditions exist: a. A partial improvement is not feasible due to the inability to achieve proper design standards; b. A partial improvement may create a potential safety hazard to motorists or pedestrians; c. Due to the nature of existing development on adjacent properties it is unlikely that street improvements would be extended in the foreseeable future and the improvement associated with the project under review does not, by itself, provide a significant improvement to street safety or capacity; d. The improvement would be in conflict with an adopted capital improvement plan; e. The improvement is associated with an approved land partition on property zoned residential and the proposed land partition does not create any new streets; or f. Additional planning work is required to define the appropriate design standards for the street and the application is for a project which would contribute only a minor portion of the anticipated future traffic on the street. 6. The standards of this chapter include the standard specifications adopted by the city engineer pursuant to 18.810.020.6. 7. The approval authority may approve adjustments to the standards of this chapter if compliance with the standards would result in an adverse impact on natural features such as wetlands, bodies of water, significant habitat areas, steep slopes, or existing mature trees. The approval authority may also approve adjustments to the standards of this chapter if compliance with the standards would have a substantial adverse impact on existing development or would preclude development on the property where the development is proposed. In approving an adjustment to the standards, the approval authority shall balance the benefit of the adjustment with the impact on the public interest represented by the standards. In evaluating the impact on the public interest, the approval authority shall consider the criteria listed in paragraph E.1 of this section. An adjustment to the standards may not be granted if the adjustment would risk public safety. Comment: lot one has frontage and direct access from 74thAve. Parcel 2 to have an access easement. Criterion are met. B. Creation of rights-of-way for streets and related purposes. Rights-of-way shall be created through the approval of a final subdivision plat or major partition; however, the council may approve the creation of a street by acceptance of a deed, provided that such street is deemed essential by the council for the purpose of general traffic circulation. 1. The council may approve the creation of a street by deed of dedication without full compliance with the regulations applicable to subdivisions or major partitions if any one or more of the following conditions are found by the council to be present: a. Establishment of a street is initiated by the council and is found to be essential for the purpose of general traffic circulation, and partitioning or subdivision of land has an incidental effect rather than being the primary objective in establishing the road or street for public use; or b. The tract in which the road or street is to be dedicated is an isolated ownership of one acre or less and such dedication is recommended by the commission to the council based on a finding that the proposal is not an attempt to evade the provisions of this title governing the control of subdivisions or major partitions. c. The street is located within the downtown mixed use central business district and has been identified on Figures 5-14A through 5-141 of the City of Tigard 2035 Transportation System Plan as a required connectivity improvement. 2. With each application for approval of a road or street right-of-way not in full compliance with the regulations applicable to the standards, the proposed dedication shall be made a condition of subdivision and major partition approval. a. The applicant shall submit such additional information and justification as may be necessary to enable the commission in its review to determine whether or not a recommendation for approval by the council shall be made. b. The recommendation, if any, shall be based upon a finding that the proposal is not in conflict with the purpose of this title. c. The commission in submitting the proposal with a recommendation to the council may attach conditions which are necessary to preserve the standards of this title. 3. All deeds of dedication shall be in a form prescribed by the city and shall name "the public" as grantee. Comment: Applicant is requesting a two parcel partition with street dedication that complies with City Engineer recommendations. The criterion is met. C. Creation of access easements. The approval authority may approve an access easement established by deed without full compliance with this title provided such an easement is the only reasonable method by which a lot large enough to develop can be created. 1. Access easements shall be provided and maintained in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code, Section 10.207. 2. Access shall be in accordance with 18.705.030.1-1 and I. Comment: Applicant is proposing a joint reciprocal access easement, to be maintained in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code Sec. 10.207 and sections 18.705. 18.705.0301. The criteria is met. D. Street location, width and grade. Except as noted below, the location, width and grade of all streets shall conform to an approved street plan and shall be considered in their relation to existing and planned streets, to topographic conditions, to public convenience and safety, and in their appropriate relation to the proposed use of the land to be served by such streets: 1. Street grades shall be approved by the city engineer in accordance with subsection N of this section; and 2. Where the location of a street is not shown in an approved street plan, the arrangement of streets in a development shall either: a. Provide for the continuation or appropriate projection of existing streets in the surrounding areas, or b. Conform to a plan adopted by the commission, if it is impractical to conform to existing street patterns because of particular topographical or other existing conditions of the land. Such a plan shall be based on the type of land use to be served, the volume of traffic, the capacity of adjoining streets and the need for public convenience and safety. E. Minimum rights-of-way and street widths. Unless otherwise indicated on an approved street plan, or as needed to continue an existing improved street or within the downtown district, street right-ofway and roadway widths shall not be less than the minimum width described below. Where a range is indicated, the width shall be determined by the decision-making authority based upon anticipated average daily traffic (ADT) on the new street segment. (The city council may adopt by resolution, design standards for street construction and other public improvements. The design standards will provide guidance for determining improvement requirements within the specified ranges.) These are presented in Table 18.810.1. 1. The decision-making body shall make its decision about desired right-of-way width and pavement width of the various street types within the subdivision or development after consideration of the following: a. The type of road as set forth in the comprehensive plan transportation chapter - functional street classification. b. Anticipated traffic generation. c. On-street parking needs. d. Sidewalk and bikeway requirements. e. Requirements for placement of utilities. f. Street lighting. g. Drainage and slope impacts. h. Street tree location. i. Planting and landscape areas. j. Safety and comfort for motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians. k. Access needs for emergency vehicles. L.Cul-de-sacs m. Street names. n. Grades and curves o. Curb, curb cuts, ramps and driveway approach. Comments: Driveway and approach will be constructed in accordance with the standards specified in this chapter, and section 15.04.080, and City Engineer. The criterion is met. P. Adjacent to Railroad. There are no railroads. Not applicable Q. Access to arterials, no arterials. Not applicable R. Alleys. No Alleys. Not applicable S. Survey monuments. Applicant acknowledges that it is the responsibility of the developers registered land surveyor to provide monuments and certification to the City that all boundary and interior monuments will be reestablished and protected. The criterion is met. T. Private streets. Applicant is not proposing any streets. Not applicable U. Railroad crossing: There is no railroad. Not applicable. V. Street signs: There is no new street signs required. Criteria is met. W: Mailboxes X. Existing dwelling has an existing approved mailbox and stand capable to expand one additional box. Criteria is met. Y: Street lights. There are no street lights required. Criteria is met. Z. Street names and signs: These criterion are not applicable. AA. Street Cross sections. This is a two lot partition and will not cause traffic congestion. Therefor the criterion is not applicable. 18.810.040 Blocks A. Block design. The length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography Comment: Applicant does not propose to change the block design. This criterion is met. B. Sizes. 1. The perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 2,000 feet measured along the centerline of the streets except: a. Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands, significant habitat areas or bodies of water, or pre-existing development; or b. For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, collectors or railroads. c. For nonresidential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. 2. Bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is exempted by paragraph 1 of this subsection B. Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. (Ord. 06-20; Ord. 02-33) Comment. Applicant is not proposing to change the block design. This criteria is met. 18.810.050 Easements A. Easements. Easements for sewers, drainage, water mains, electric lines or other public utilities shall be either dedicated or provided for in the deed restrictions, and where a development is traversed by a watercourse or drainage way, there shall be provided a storm water easement or drainage right-of-way conforming substantially with the lines of the watercourse. B. Utility easements. A property owner proposing a development shall make arrangements with the city, the applicable district, and each utility franchise for the provision and dedication of utility easements necessary to provide full services to the development. The city's standard width for public main line utility easements shall be 15 feet unless otherwise specified by the utility company, applicable district, or city engineer. A reciprocal easement for utilities, storm, sewer, and access drive to run along the north property line from 74th Ave. approx.. 123' where proposed lot 2 would begin. 18.810.060 Lots A. Size and shape. Lot size, width, shape and orientation shall be appropriate for the location of the development and for the type of use contemplated, and: 1. No lot shall contain part of an existing or proposed public right-of-way within its dimensions. Comment. There is no public right of way. Not applicable 2. The depth of all lots shall not exceed 2-1/2 times the average width, unless the parcel is less than 1-1/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. Comment: Proposed lot is less than 1-1/2 times the minimum lot size for the Zoning district. Each lot to be approx. 7502 Sq.ft. Criterion is met. 3. Depth and width of properties zoned for commercial and industrial purposes shall be adequate to provide for the off-street parking and service facilities required by the type of use proposed. B. Lot frontage. Each lot shall abut upon a public or private street, other than an alley, for a width of at least 25 feet unless the lot is created through a minor land partition in which case 18.162.050.0 applies, or unless the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, in which case the lot frontage shall be at least 15 feet. Comment: Application for a minor land partition and each partition is abutting a public street or has a dedicated access way with reciprocal easement. Lot 1 to have approx. 62.4 feet frontage, and lot 2 will have 15' dedicated access to a 15' wide lot front. The criteria has been met. C. Through lots. Through lots shall be avoided except where they are essential to provide separation of residential development from major traffic arterials or to overcome specific disadvantages of topography and orientation, and: 1. A planting buffer at least 10 feet wide is required abutting the arterial rights-of- way; and 2. All through lots shall provide the required front yard setback on each street. Applicant is not proposing a through lot D. Lot side lines. The side lines of lots, as far as practicable, shall be at right angles to the street upon which the lots front. Comment: Sidelines to both parcels will be close to right angles from the street. The criteria is met. E. Large lots. In dividing tracts into large lots or parcels which at some future time are likely to be re- divided, the commission may require that the lots be of such size and shape, and be so divided into building sites, and contain such site restrictions as will provide for the extension and opening of streets at intervals which will permit a subsequent division of any tract into lots or parcels of smaller size. The land division shall be denied if the proposed large development lot does not provide for the future division of the lots and future extension of public facilities. Not applicable. 18.810.070 Sidewalks A. Sidewalks. All industrial streets and private streets shall have sidewalks meeting city standards along at least one side of the street. All other streets shall have sidewalks meeting city standards along both sides of the street. A development may be approved if an adjoining street has sidewalks on the side adjoining the development, even if no sidewalk exists on the other side of the street. Comment: Applicant is not proposing sidewalks due to the size of this partition. This criteria is not applicable by City Engineer recommendation. B. Requirement of developers. 1. As part of any development proposal, or change in use resulting in an additional 1,000 vehicle trips or more per day, an applicant shall be required to identify direct, safe (1.25 x the straight line distance) pedestrian routes within 1/2 mile of their site to all transit facilities and neighborhood activity centers (schools, parks, libraries, etc.). In addition, the developer may be required to participate in the removal of any gaps in the pedestrian system off-site if justified by the development. 2. If there is an existing sidewalk on the same side of the street as the development within 300 feet of a development site in either direction, the sidewalk shall be extended from the site to meet the existing sidewalk, subject to rough proportionality (even if the sidewalk does not serve a neighborhood activity center). C. Planter strip requirements. A planter strip separation of at least five feet between the curb and the sidewalk shall be required in the design of streets, except where the following conditions exist: there is inadequate right-of-way; the curbside sidewalks already exist on predominant portions of the street; it would conflict with the utilities; there are significant natural features (large trees, water features, significant habitat areas, etc.) that would be destroyed if the sidewalk were located as required; or where there are existing structures in close proximity to the street (15 feet or less) or where the standards in Table 18.810.1 specify otherwise. Additional consideration for exempting the planter strip requirement --N11 ''4N may be given on a case-by-case basis if a property abuts more than one street frontage. D. Maintenance. Maintenance of sidewalks, curbs, and planter strips is the continuing obligation of the adjacent property owner. E. Application for permit and inspection. If the construction of a sidewalk is not included in a performance bond of an approved subdivision or the performance bond has lapsed, then every person, firm or corporation desiring to construct sidewalks as provided by this chapter, shall, before entering upon the work or improvement, apply for a street opening permit to the Engineering Department to so build or construct: 1. An occupancy permit shall not be issued for a development until the provisions of this section are satisfied. 2. The city engineer may issue a permit and certificate allowing temporary noncompliance with the provisions of this section to the owner, builder or contractor when, in his or her opinion, the construction of the sidewalk is impractical for one or more of the following reasons: a. Sidewalk grades have not and cannot be established for the property in question within a reasonable length of time; b. Forthcoming installation of public utilities or street paving would be likely to cause severe damage to the new sidewalk; c. Street right-of-way is insufficient to accommodate a sidewalk on one or both sides of the street; or d. Topography or elevation of the sidewalk base area makes construction of a sidewalk impractical or economically infeasible. 3. The city engineer shall inspect the construction of sidewalks for compliance with the provision set forth in the standard specifications manual. F. Council initiation of construction. In the event one or more of the following situations are found by the council to exist, the council may adopt a resolution to initiate construction of a sidewalk in accordance with city ordinances: 1. A safety hazard exists for children walking to or from school and sidewalks are necessary to eliminate the hazard; 2. A safety hazard exists for pedestrians walking to or from a public building, commercial area, place of assembly or other general pedestrian traffic, and sidewalks are necessary to eliminate the hazard; 3. Fifty percent or more of the area in a given block has been improved by the construction of dwellings, multiple dwellings, commercial buildings or public buildings and/or parks; and 4. A criteria which allowed noncompliance under this section no longer exists and a sidewalk could be constructed in conformance with city standards. (Ord. 12-13 §1; Ord. 06-20; Ord. 02-33; Ord. 99-22) Comment: As per City of Tigard Engineer recommendation, there are no sidewalks in our street, and none will be required. Criteria has been met. 18.810.080 Public Use Areas A. Dedication requirements. 1. Where a proposed park, playground or other public use shown in a development plan adopted by the city is located in whole or in part in a subdivision, the commission may require the dedication or reservation of such area within the subdivision, provided that the reservation or dedication is roughly proportional to the impact of the subdivision on the park system. 2. Where considered desirable by the commission in accordance with adopted comprehensive plan policies, and where a development plan of the city does not indicate proposed public use areas, the commission may require the dedication or reservation of areas within the subdivision or sites of a character, extent and location suitable for the development of parks or other public use, provided that the reservation or dedication is roughly proportional to the impact of the subdivision on the park system. B. Acquisition by public agency. If the developer is required to reserve land area for a park, playground, or other public use, such land shall be acquired by the appropriate public agency within 18 months following plat approval, at a price agreed upon prior to approval of the plat, or such reservation shall be released to the subdivider. (Ord. 99-22) Comment: Applicant does not propose any dedication for a park. Not applicable. 18.810.090 Sanitary Sewers A. Sewers required. Sanitary sewers shall be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. B. Sewer plan approval. The city engineer shall approve all sanitary sewer plans and proposed systems prior to issuance of development permits involving sewer service. C. Over-sizing. Proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the comprehensive plan. D. Permits denied. Development permits may be restricted by the commission or hearings officer where a deficiency exists in the existing sewer system or portion thereof which cannot be rectified within the development and which if not rectified will result in a threat to public health or safety, surcharging of existing mains, or violations of state or federal standards pertaining to operation of the sewage treatment system. Comments: Applicant to meet City Engineer standards for sanitary sewer. The design of sewer will comply with the design and construction standards for Sanitary and Surface water Management and the adopted policies of the Comprehensive plan. City Engineer to review the plans to ensure compliance with these standards and the applicant will follow the appropriate procedure for obtaining necessary permits. This criterion is met. 18.810.100 Storm Drainage A. General provisions. The director and city engineer shall issue a development permit only where adequate provisions for stormwater and floodwater runoff have been made, and: 1. The storm water drainage system shall be separate and independent of any sanitary sewerage system; 2. Where possible, inlets shall be provided so surface water is not carried across any intersection or allowed to flood any street; and 3. Surface water drainage patterns shall be shown on every development proposal plan. B. Easements. Where a development is traversed by a watercourse, drainage way, channel or stream, there shall be provided a storm water easement or drainage right-of-way conforming substantially with the lines of such watercourse and such further width as will be adequate for conveyance and maintenance. C. Accommodation of upstream drainage. A culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development, and the city engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). D. Effect on downstream drainage. Where it is anticipated by the city engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the director and engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). Comments: Applicant to have a storm drainage system based on the provisions of design and construction standards for Sanitary and Surface water management, accommodating the upstream drainage if any and the downstream drainage and there effects on downstream drainage. City Engineer to review plans to ensure compliance with these standards and the applicant will follow the appropriate procedures for obtaining suitable permits. Existing home is connected to existing buried culvert, Parcel 2 and it's access way will drain via gravity fed new piping to code, along the North side of property, draining into existing buried storm drain at front on 74th Ave. Existing storm drain is buried from Taylors Ferry Rd. running South on 74th. Ave. to approximately 16' south of South West corner. There is approximately 16" of down slope going from Northwest corner to Southwest corner along 74th Ave. The top of the crown is approximately 20 feet to the North of Northwest corner of property. The criterion is met. 18.810.110 Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways A. Bikeway extension. 1. As a standard, bike lanes shall be required along all arterial and collector routes and where identified on the city's adopted bicycle plan in the transportation system plan (TSP). Bike lane requirements along collectors within the downtown urban renewal district shall be determined by the city engineer unless specified in Table 18.810.1. 2. Developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the city's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or rights-of-way, provided such dedication is directly related to and roughly proportional to the impact of the development. 3. Any new street improvement project shall include bicycle lanes as required in this document and on the adopted bicycle plan. B. Cost of construction. Development permits issued for planned unit developments, conditional use permits, subdivisions and other developments which will principally benefit from such bikeways shall be conditioned to include the cost or construction of bikeway improvements in an amount roughly proportional to the impact of the development. C. Minimum width. 1. The minimum width for bikeways within the roadway is five feet per bicycle travel lane. 2. The minimum width for multi-use paths separated from the road and classified as regional or community trails in the Greenway Trail System Master Plan is 10 feet. The width may be reduced to eight feet if there are environmental or other constraints. 3. The minimum width for off-street paths classified as neighborhood trails, according to the Greenway Trail System Master Plan, is three feet. 4. Design standards for bike and pedestrian-ways shall be determined by the city engineer. (Ord. 1213 §1; Ord. 11-04 §2; Ord. 09-09 §3; Ord. 02-33; Ord. 99-22) Comments: Applicant is not proposing any Bike paths or pedestrian pathway. Not applicable. 18.810.120 Utilities A. Underground utilities. All utility lines including, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: 1. The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; 2. The city reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; 3. All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and 4. Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. B. Information on development plans. The applicant for a development shall show on the development plan or in the explanatory information, easements for all underground utility facilities, and: 1. Plans showing the location of all underground facilities as described herein shall be submitted to the city engineer for review and approval; and 2. Care shall be taken in all cases to ensure that above ground equipment does not obstruct vision clearance areas for vehicular traffic. C. Exception to undergrounding requirement. 1. The developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of undergrounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of undergrounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which undergrounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. 2. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. 3. Properties within the CBD zoning district shall be exempt from the requirements for undergrounding of utility lines and from the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. 4. The exceptions in paragraphs 1 through 3 of this subsection C shall apply only to existing utility lines. All new utility lines shall be placed underground. D. Fee in-lieu of undergrounding. 1. The city engineer shall establish utility service areas in the city. All development which occurs within a utility service area shall pay a fee in-lieu of undergrounding for utilities if the development does not provide underground utilities, unless exempted by this code. 2. The city engineer shall establish the fee by utility service area which shall be determined based upon the estimated cost to underground utilities within each service area. The total estimated cost for undergrounding in a service area shall be allocated on a front-foot basis to each party within the service area. The fee due from any developer shall be calculated based on a front-foot basis. 3. A developer shall receive a credit against the fee for costs incurred in the undergrounding of existing overhead utilities. The city engineer shall determine N*." %-� the amount of the credit, after review of cost information submitted by the applicant with the request for credit. 4. The funds collected in each service area shall be used for undergrounding utilities within the city at large. The city engineer shall prepare and maintain a list of proposed undergrounding projects which may be funded with the fees collected by the city. The list shall indicate the estimated timing and cost of each project. The list shall be submitted to the city council for their review and approval annually. Comments: Applicant has designed partition to enable all utilities to be placed underground and will make necessary arrangements with the service utilities to supply the underground services, Applicant is showing utility easements on the development plans. Criteria is met. 18.810.130 Cash or Bond Required A. Guarantee. All improvements installed by the developer shall be guaranteed as to workmanship and material for a period of one year following acceptance by the city council. B. Cash deposit or bond. Such guarantee shall be secured by cash deposit or bond in the amount of the value of the improvements as set by the city engineer. C. Compliance requirements. The cash or bond shall comply with the terms and conditions of Section 18.430.090. Comments: The applicant will guarantee all improvements installed as to workmanship and material for one year following acceptance by the City. The cash deposit or bond in the amount of the value of the improvements as set by the City Engineer and comply with the terms and conditions of 18.430.090. 18.810.140 Monuments—Replacement Required Any monuments that are disturbed before all improvements are completed by the subdivider shall be replaced prior to final acceptance of the improvements. Comments: The applicant will replace any monuments that are disturbed before all improvements are completed prior to final acceptance of the improvements. 18.810.150 Installation Prerequisite A. Approval required. No public improvements, including sanitary sewers, storm sewers, streets, sidewalks, curbs, lighting or other requirements shall be undertaken except after the plans have been approved by the city, permit fee paid, and permit issued. B. Permit fee. The permit fee is required to defray the cost and expenses incurred by the city for construction and other services in connection with the improvement. The permit fee shall be set by council resolution. Comments: Applicant acknowledges that all plans need to be approved by the city and the permit fees paid and permit issued prior to commencing of the construction of the public improvements. Criterion is met. 18.810.160 Installation Conformation A. Conformance required. In addition to other requirements, improvements installed by the developer either as a requirement of these regulations or at his/her own option, shall conform to the requirements of this chapter and to improvement standards and specifications followed by the city. B. Adopted installation standards. The Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, Oregon Chapter A.P.W.A., and Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) shall be a part of the city's adopted installation standard(s); other standards may also be required upon recommendation of the city engineer. Comment: Applicant to conform to the requirements of this chapter and to the improvement standards and specifications followed by the City of Tigard. Criterion is met. 18.810.170 Plan Check A. Submittal requirements. Work shall not begin until construction plans and construction estimates have been submitted and checked for adequacy and approved by the city engineer in writing. The developer can obtain detailed information about submittal requirements from the city engineer. B. Compliance. All such plans shall be prepared in accordance with requirements of the city. `. �... Comment: Applicant will not begin work until construction plans and estimates have been submitted and checked for adequacy and approved by the city engineer in writing. The applicant will gain information about the submittal requirements from the city engineer and comply with the requirements of the city. The criterion is met. 18.810.180 Notice to City A. Commencement. Work shall not begin until the city has been notified in advance. B. Resumption. If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the city is notified. Comments: Applicant will not start work until the City has approved and been informed in advance. The criteria is met. 18.810.190 City Inspection of Improvements Improvements shall be constructed under the inspection and to the satisfaction of the city. The city may require changes in typical sections and details if unusual conditions arising during construction warrant such changes in the public interest. 18.810.200 Engineer's Written Certification Required The developer's engineer shall provide written certification of a form provided by the city that all improvements, workmanship and materials are in accord with current and standard engineering and construction practices, and are of high grade, prior to city acceptance of the subdivision's improvements or any portion thereof for operation and maintenance. Comment: The applicant's engineer shall provide written certification of a form provided by the city that all improvements, workmanship and materials are in accord with current and standard engineering and construction practices, and are of high grade, prior to city acceptance of the subdivision's improvements or any portion thereof for operation and maintenance. Conclusion: The applicant has demonstrated and satisfied the requirements of the Development Code for the City of Tigard and the two parcel partition application should be approved. Proposal for Minor Partition George Deoca 9230 SW 74 Ave Proposed Minor Partition for 1 residential, 7502Sq.ft. Meeting the requirements of R4.5 zoning. Access will be through a 15' reciprocal easement withl0' paved. 18390.00: Impact should be minimal for one additional tax lot. Existing utilities are on 74th. ave. Attached are letters from TVWD, and CWS and Fire hydrant flow test. Lot is fairly level and we do not anticipate having to move any dirt off site. Building site is approximately 6' above the street facilitating sewer and surface water. The new home would be paying into the Parks SDC. 18420.50 Proposed partition meets all Zoning, and regulation requirements. All utilities are on 74th. ave reducing impact. Letters from TVWD, and from CWS. Building envelope to maintain set backs for a flag lot leaving approx. 40X50' not including set backs. Proposed lot to be 7502 Sq.ft. not including access drive of 1845 Sq.ft. . Access will be through a 15' reciprocal easement withl0' paved. Screening will be maintained by means of a fence, wood or chain link with slats and clear vision will be maintained as per 18.795 Fire Department has reviewed our proposed lot and no additional requirement will be necessary. Reciprocal easement to be recorded. Access drive to be 15' wide and less than 150' avoiding any additional fire turn around. 18510: Neighborhood livability will be kept at R4.5 Zoning standard, lot to be 7502Sq.ft. not including access. All set backs for a flag lot will be kept. The Density will be maintained, Total land 16969— 120 foot for 2 foot dedication, - 1845 for Access drive leaves 15004 Sq.ft. leaving 7502 feet for each lot. 18745.00 We have two street trees now numbered 1 and 2 on forestry plan. 18745.050 Buffering and screening along North side of Access easement, fencing to be wood of chain link with slats, and planting meeting the requirements of 18745-B 4 a.1. Approximately 9 plants. Clear vision to be maintained as per 18795. 18765 Each home to have off street parking. Double car garages and room for more cars in front of garages. Clear vision to be maintained 18810 Access through a 15' reciprocal easement to 74th ave. Meeting Uniform fire code and according to 18705.H.1. proposed lot would not create any new street or connection thereof. 18810.60 Proposed lot not in public right of way, and is less than 1 and %2 times the minimum lot size of 7500Sq.ft., we propose 7502Sq.ft. Lot frontage for flag lot to be 15'. 18810.070 and No sidewalk required as per City Engineer. See Greg. 18810090, 18810100 Building site is approximately 6' above the street facilitating sewer and surface water. Sewer is 11'4" deep at manhole on Northside. All utilities underground through the access easement. PARTITION PLAT PARTITION PLAT NO. A REPLAT OF A PORTION OF LOT 4, TRACT 1, "BOULEVARD HEIGHTS' PXCORDED AS DOCUlTNT NO. LOCATED IN THE SE Y OF SECTION 25 TNS RTW, W,M. IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON 601.10Y, OREGON DATE' JUNE 26, 2016 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING FILE NO. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE DECLARATION APPROVALS 1,GALE L HOLT,HEADY COITFY THAT i NAGE CORRECTLY SURWYED AMC NNW ALL YETI BY TISK PRESENT&THAT GEORGE DEOCA AND SILNE DEOCA ARE YAIB®MITI PROPEII YOIUYONTAIOII T T LANG REPRESENTED ON ME TIE OYNORS W THE LAND OESCRIBD N TWE ACCOMPANYING SURWYOR73 A=W PARTITION YAP,RENO A PPUT OP A PART OF LOT 4,TRACT CERTIFICATE AND NAW CAUSED 1110 PARTITION PUT TO K PRPMED AND THE APPROVED NMB DAY Of 30� C 1,WOULEVAM NUNTF.LOCATD N THE SOOT-AV WARIER OF PR"17Y OPMD N ACCORDANCE WN OAS.OIMIEI RSL A0 SHOON ON Ts KCTON 7a TOMNWP T SWTN RANGE 1 MESE OI THE TBWJIETIE ANEp®YM AND O4AR ANO OUJIT NEW NON-EXOUSIVE EAWIEITS, TME IDG BM PARTICULARLY CDOKD ANTHE CITY nLLOM OTOI COUNTY,OREOOM.MORE ANY N W���Apq��A� DO MMM DOCATE T9 THE CITY W TIGARD OTY ENGINEER PUBLIC AS 8401101. BEGINNING AT NNE"INITIAL PONT AS 814004 ON MIS PUT,RONp THE ........................ Y�tg1 TOF T FES AMMILYMTRUSSTT W DECIANONTRACT�LAND 2014- Q74111 YTO MEWORK KOCA &- -DEOCA APPROVED TMiS-��DAY 0I 30_, WASHINGTON COUNTY OW WOOMIL KING A PONT ON EDIT UNE OF SAID LOT 4 VOCH 18 DISTANCE OF 59.46 rEi"TH PROM lnliE muT�N1M 01 SAIDT ALONG SAO REST DLiOT N ACKNOWLEDGMENT THINGS OONTPAPINI NORM 009790'EAST LOB PELT TO A PONT T IDNCE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON WASHINGTON COUNTY SURWYON SHIN InrU'EAST A DISTANCE W 10680 RST TO A POINT ON THE SS WT UNE W SAA)LONR Y.700ES FAMILY TRUST TRACT TIBNGL STATE OP OREGON SWTW 0097'70'REST ALONG SAA)EAST UME,A DISTANCE W 128 MY WON ALL MEN BY TN[IE PRDENTS MAT ON 20 SME ...w.....n.r...a.n.P TO A PONT ON THE NORM LINE W MAY gRTAIN TRACT OF LAND YE A NOTARY PUBLIC N NO MR SAID 00514 C�AU COIWWD TO MRK KNA AND SAM KOOA BY DOOJNWT NO APPEARED GAME KOCA AND 0I 0Ep0A,MNO KNO FIRST OILY WON 010 ALL TAXOL FDS.ASOMSK NT8 OR OTHER CNAROD AS PROVIDED wo-071180,WASHINGTON COUNTY D®KCM CS;Imal:WITH SAY MK T1s C AT 11sY Are POMIN M ON$NAMED E FOREGOING BY MILL OLKS NAW BEEN PAID ASW 2015 0 11'00'EAST ALONG SAID NORM LINE,A DISTANCE W 180.{8 FRET TO INSTRUMENT.AND MAT SAID INSTRUMENT WAS OKOUTM ON MPR INNALF WASIIN01011 COUNTY.OREGON ME NORMEAST OORNEI TIORM THENCE MW W 009Y70'REST,ALONG PRIMLY AND VOLNTARLY. THE EAST LIR W SAO OEOG TRACT A DISTANCE W 50.04 FaT TO T E SOHUIMILAST MARGIN TIOIEW,BEND MARKED BY A 3/4 NCH NGN PFG SOUTH�aNdRLI " tsHBY AACE OF 227LISS FRT TO TiK SOUrAINT CORNIER MElIW1 NO A DEPUTY HENCE NORTH 0097'70'EAST,ALONG TK REST UNE W SAID DEOCA NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON TRACT,A DISTANDS W KNOB FM TO ME INITIAL PONT. ..........w............ CORANINO 16,800 SOUAK ILST,VOR[OR UML COMMISSION NO, YY COMMISSION IDMI. STAT:OF OREGON L6 Cahn W WA94NOTON 1 DO MOODY CERTBY THAT THIS PARTITION PUT NARRATIVE WAS RECEIVED FOR PEOM ON ME DAY OF SOS 11R OWDPURPOSEIN W TSS SI1RW'r L TO YOII E NO A PARTITION 1 L'A8 AT O'CLOOL--N. A►PROWD N CITY W TEAM PWIIF40 FILE M0.tLA101hCOOL AND RECORDED IN THE COUNTY ODN KCOML RECORD ILIOC YONUYENA COLIC MOUND A8 SNOW P01 MNG PNNC RR1KY W Ts ^ LPROPORTY,REOOIA)D AS 8N 77610.WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEY TISK MONUMENTS ROK NOD FOR TOE BOUPIDARY OF TOS PARTITON PUT, BT AND PARCEL 00181018 MODE SET AS SNOON. DEPUTY COUNTY CILRN Ts SABB W KAMM 18 111E SWM UNL BLTImN KOORD 7/4'INION NPCB POND M CPLD FON ON THS RAY W'BOULLVAM HE011,AND A8 WELD ON 8N 32810.THE KAWIO FOR THIS UNE 15 TAMP PROM ME PUT W 1DIRLVAM IB E114W. R LAN E1 �Bp 3IL,17 ULT � RENEWS 07/01/17 CLIENT. George Dsoeo BuPYeyen BE me nm, Ina end C II0[.G1n:.rl^R�n00— A.BRP BBB Sandy,OR(7053 PN.n.,(007)648-7131 rem(f07)088-4770 Su Lori M n. I DWO NUW ED 14-�24-PAR-FINALOWO 8/28A: /15 SHE 2 PRELIMINARY 2—PARCEL PARTITION _, .. � �'-;-.,.:;;:; '': :',. 44�" •'! � EXISTING FEATURES PLAN PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT LOCATED IN THE SE Y. OF SECTION 25, TIS, R1W, W,M, IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON(COUNTY, OREGON �'I ,..� '.V•'.,• DATE: MAY 19, 2015 SCALE: 1' 70' CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING FILE NO. MTS VICINITY MAP h Y N46.4911 1067 a SCALE i 1' 2� 10, 2w TAX LOT 2500 TAX LOT 3100 ,.:�� [['�6'�',7,v' r;,�'�:,yX'r•'r ;W??IMt,• [lO5TN0 NWBE pp i� I Y 6-•,..'I;,r,�'}++�,'°di' S ag'i• V_ •' _ TAX LOT 2400 mom\iii•r,'; °u'Atl 0.0 1 \ F'F+u'":i'6-., +q.• Ny9v1•oo•w27e.1e' \ 1097' \O _ _. -''s se• __ 1 _ C.I— \ \ tet\6 \ PP 2003-048 ?T�, !,t �.., .Zea!:, CHW t Nr�Tory 1 fit{ \I 1 \ �\ i. 1 \ I _ 1 �. 2x• \CRFA79 90'MINIMUM 1a2 S d, OLIIAR FROM NORTH It \1 0� 7�OZ\SF \\ 1 �'\ j•�\ \ a t PARCEL t a Cw9iw0 HOUK r nEiAW 8,3J1�3 SF �\ ��• \\ 741% \\\ �0•,� rApCq+ �•�'�!`,;'.;;":f't:'. \ 7.502 SF" %CLUDIN@Q / \ *i ACCESS EESEMENT) \\ \ \\ 27 / \ \\ PP 2007-055 2.( I }w•,,.,,n \�\ \\ \ \ \\ \�?o� 1\ \\ LOT 2 '`•� 1i'ilO)�•DEDICATION\\ I 202.0' 71.1' •w/' i aX 1 x9z+'oo'E 277.17'Tem \ \ TAX LOT 2900 \ EL-280.11 PMCEL 2 TAX LOT 2902 0p ' 26 aF)'QJ CLALv —K FFD *z N,^e NOrth•lo ?AA�tnrS Rtrr.l Road r CLIENT: George De000 OWNER / DEAE—LOM i RD ssl L OFORW DEOCA UR tiurveym k Plannenr Inc. 9270 719 747H AIX. TIGARD,OR 07227 0—y ng,PI ann 1.9 rHOM(007)741-4027 and CIr11 En0ln.arin 00 ,0,1..079 11-44,07�70Y mann(707)466-717+ ALL L2NUL tela(90.7 XA770 2w7 svn.ar toan. a n RENEWS 07/01/15 OpHE&WO NUMBER: 14-224—TOPO.OWG S �OF T. 11-18-14 PARTITION PLAT PAW=ON PLAT NO. A REPLAT OF A PORTION OF LOT 4, TRACT 1, 'BOULEVARD HEIGHTS' liECORDED A3 DOCURUff NO. LOCATED IN THE BE Y4 OF SECTION 25, TIS, R1W, W.M. IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON DATE: JUNE 28,2015 SCALE: 1'- 20' CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING FILE N0. k'IRON PIK NO RECORD HED FOR K°T UME JO'W 674• •� SCALE:1•.20' 10, 20, , TAX LOT 2700 N TAX LOT 2500 TAX LOT 34005/r om ROD S/3''ACUP 06MARMID 3/5, ROD 5-3151' 6/8'180N ROD W/YPC NMtm POI IN 31610 NE FOR E STRECORD UNE N00'33'JOt 'ACSIN 325-J161` NO CAR.SV MOTH U NEW ISR CAST UNE W 72610 S00'.U'30`W 7.30' \ NfLD NONTN UN( TAX LOT 3100 AS CALLED ON LOB' 1 1 IYUO'[A.70' PP 2007-ON 1` 00071'00'9 le6.e6' W-Y30-C l.w 207 PJC UI M CA 161/6'N ROOT AND 60OI1f PARC4ET 13. 163.77 NO NOOK _ _ �Se0TYB6t N.06' _ _.=2006°'e�N60R1'�^Y NM PP 2003-040 Q '� PARCEL 2 it 4 gPARCEL, 1 �br! 7502 SF r C 7,502 SF(EXCLUDING �7a• PARCEL 1 N ACCESS EASEMENT) I PP 2007 L—• � 2'aaNT DP WAY o6puTNX+ PAR=2 2 Lar 202.11' 74,07' 3/allm Npl P64 1w FOR 5w Copm BASS W 21'00"W S &t'M9ALVARo NEfaTY Nw7ra6•w 27e.1e'A1ua•vw 7/4'IRON PIAL a�OTaA`slAw NaaTe 6N 11603 Ca"REPARCEL 2 TAX LOT 2902 TAX LOT 2900 NEW PORwT K44TRAM I .TRACT 1 BOULEVARD NICDIIn LEGEND • FOUND MONUMENT A5 NOT=HEREON O SET 6/e•eY 30`NON ROD STM YELLOW PLASTIC NOTES: CAP YAR11®•ACYP 445-3101•,ON XX TAX LOT NIRMOM ARE ON OWN FOR RE/OIWCE ONLY,As W/VPC IODATES DATES WTH YELLOW FLAAMC CAR y NUMIER 13 11 2508, ON WA9INNOTOH DWNTY.ASS OR'9 YAP OU 010"M DOW U WAN t07/01 1 CLIENT: George De666 OM INDICATES MADAM VALUE IR NOWES NON ROD IP N"101 WON PIK,MW DIAMETER qyySN KXCATLB IURKY NUMBOL WAIDOWTON COUNTY SURVEY RECORDS end�GM,°inglnnnsto6e NDICATES PMWTION PLAT NUMBER PMnN(303)909-3141 �/QT ion(6611°M-4730 sub of to OenP1W CameRENEWS /17 DWO NU M T 14 ,2Z45PAR-FINALOWO SHEET 1 Ofd 2 /28 F"7CEIVED CITY OF TIGARD Clean Water Services File Number PLANNINGJ, VGIN €RW� 15-001716 (jean Water Services Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment 1. Jurisdiction: W89MR08A GeuaW City of Tigard 2. Property Information (example 1S234A801400) 3. Owner Information Tax lot ID(s): Name: George Deoca Company: Address: 9230 SW 74th Ave Site Address: 9230 SW 74th Ave. City,State,Zip: Tigard Oregon 97223 City,State,Zip: Tigard Oregon 97223 Phone/Fax: 503-341-4023 Nearest Cross Street: TaylorsFerry E-Mail: gdeoca200l@yahoo.com 4. Development Activity(check afl that apply) 5. Applicant Information ❑ Addition to Single Family Residence(rooms,deck,garage) Name: George Deoca ❑ Lot Line Adjustment (R Minor Land Partition Company: ❑ Residential Condominium ❑ Commercial Condominium Address: 9230 SW 74th Ave ❑ Residential Subdivision ❑ Commercial Subdivision ❑ Single Lot Commercial ❑ Multi Lot Commercial City,State,Zip: Tigard Oregon 97223 Other Phone/Fax: 503-341-4023 E-Mail: gdeoca200l@yahoo.com 6. Will the project involve any off-site work? ❑Yes a No ❑Unknown Location and description of off-site work 7. Additional comments or information that may be needed to understand your project Thank you This application does NOT replace Grading and Erosion Control Permits,Connection Permits,Building Permits,Site Development Permits,DEQ 1200-C Permit or other permits as issued by the Department of Environmental Quality,Department of State Lands and/or Department of the Army COE. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,state,and federal law. By signing this form,the Owner or Owner's authorized agent or representative,acknowledges and agrees that employees of Clean Water Services have authority to enter the project site at all reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting project site conditions and gathering information related to the project site. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this document,and to the best of my knowledge and belief,this information is true,complete,and accurate. Print(Type Name George Deoca PrinVType Title Owner ONLINE SUBMITTAL Date 6/3/2015 FOR DISTRICT USE ONLY ❑ Sensitive areas potentially exist on site or within 200'of the site. THE APPLICANT MUST PERFORM A SITE ASSESSMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER. If Sensitive Areas exist on the site or within 200 feet on adjacent properties,a Natural Resources Assessment Report may also be required. I$JI Based on review of the submitted materials and best available information Sensitive areas do not appear to exist on site or within 200'of the site.This Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered.This document will serve as your Service Provider letter as required by Resolution and Order 07-20, Section 3.02.1. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,State,and federal law. ❑ Based on review of the submitted materials and best available information the above referenced project will not significantly impact the existing or potentially sensitive area(s)found near the site.This Sensitive Area Pre-Screening SiteAssessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect additional water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered.This document will serve as your Service Provider letter as required by Resolution and Order 07-20,Section 3.02.1. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,state and federal law. ❑This Service Provider Letter is not valid unless CWS approved site plan(s)are attached. ❑The proposed activity does not meet the definition of development or the lot was platted after 9/9/95 ORS 92.040(2). NO SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. Reviewed by _ '� Date 06/05/15 Fax�(5033)681-4439 Tualatin Valley Water District Delivering the Best Water _ Janme _ value May 26iZO15 GeorBeDeoca 9238SVV74mAvenue Tigard,[>R97J23 Subject: Statement of Service Availability Dear Mr. Qeuca~ Tualatin Valley Water District has adequate capacity to provide service to the proposed subdivision/partition at9Z3OSVV74'h Avenue,Tigard Oregon,Tax Lot 28OO(assessor 1oxnmap 1S125DB). The proposed use will make the necessary connections and/or extensions of water mains,as required,to serve the subject property and will be shown on plans submitted for approval prior twconnection tmthe system. Contact the Tualatin Valley Water District for requirements regarding submittal of plans for review and approval and for review fees orany questions you may have. Sincerely, 4 C��— KyanSmith Engineering Associate 503.848.3057 TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT Test#: 1156 FIRE HYDRANT FLOW TEST REPORT Hydrant 1a 1S1W25D17FH5C Location: 74TH AVE&CEDARCREST Date: 6/2/2015 Test made by: HERB&JAMES Witness: Time. 3:25 Proiect name: Discharge coefficient: .54816 Inside dia. of outlet= 4.5 inches Pitot reading = Pitot 2 35 psi 0 psi Observed flow rate = 1958.3 gpm Flow method: HOSE MONSTER Static pressure: 96 psi Residual pressure: 76 psi $)to L5 Flow at 20psi residual pressure (calculated): 14027 gpm Location map: To be attached to test report and to show which hydrants were used to monitor residual pressure and flow. Gage information: Static and residual pressure gage: 120997-2C Pitot gage: 9864E-1 Hydrant information: Hydrant 1D Year Make Notes Flow hydrant: 1 S1 W25D17FH50 2003 WATEROUS see map for location Read hydrant., 1SIW25DIFH50 2008 WATEROUS see map for location Remarks: The mapping,flow or pressure information contained herein reflects conditions on the date and time of the test. Tualatin Valley Water District makes no representation as to the system's ability to meet specific fire flow requirements. Future system capability may differ from the flows reported herein because of subsequent modifications to the district's system and/or because flow and pressure may vary by time of day and season. Test gage callibration information available upon request. 1 1 I -------------- n0.9 I m V V N I I CL ! d Nil 9 2� 9 6 �. j ,X ! I i i 3 1 j t� K I 4 3 b d N ' 1 { i. RECEi ,v ED AUG 17 2015 CITY OF TIGARD Urban ForeAtYN fyl'� n Supplemental report Aug.S, 2015 2-Lot Minor Partition 9230 SW 74th. Ave. Tigard Oregon 97223 Rob Crouch Community Tree, LLC. Certified Arborist cert.#PNw-366A. � r Table of Contents Purpose....................................................................................1 General Description................................................................1 Effectivetree canopy cover...................................................1 Specifications...........................................................................2 Signature of approval..............................................................2 Purpose: This report prepared for 9230 SW 74th. Ave. Tigard, Or. Applying for a 2- lot minor partition, in the R 4.5 zoning district. This report is pursuant to the City Of Tigard Urban Forest Manual. This report describes existing trees located on the site, providing arborist recommendation on tree preservation, protection and effective tree canopy cover, condition of tree and size, meeting the City requirements. Certified Arborist Rob Couch physically visited site and measured trees and noted conditions to facilitate this report. Description: Subject site is on the East side of 74th Ave. has one existing single family dwelling towards the front of the property, and proposal to minor partition for a future single family home to be built in the rear lot. A 15' access drive will go from 70 Ave. to proposed lot. There are 21 existing on site trees. There are two street front trees, numbered as 1, Spruce, and 2, Shore Pine on report having an effective canopy coverage of 2712 Sq. Ft. 36%, these will be preserved. The 19 remaining trees are located on the newly proposed lot. Trees numbered 18-21 Douglas Firs to be preserved, leaving approx. 6172 sq.ft. 82% effective canopy area. Tree protection as described in the urban Forest Manual will be installed and kept up until construction of new home is complete. No construction is proposed at this time for the two lot partition, however this report has been prepared to meet the city requirements for minor partitions. If lot 2 is to develop and have construction, a tree preservation plan in detail will be submitted to city. Effective Tree Canopy Cover: .-N Of the 21 existing on site trees, 6 are to be preserved to meet city requirements for Effective tree canopy cover. 2 existing street trees meet the street requirement of 1 per dwelling. No new street trees are required. A summary of the effective tree canopy cover by lot is included in this report. Newly proposed lot 2 to have 4 trees leaving 6172 Sq.ft. effective canopy cover. This is 82% effective canopy area. The minimum is 15 % therefor this criteria is met. Existing lot 1 to have two trees having an effective canopy of 2712 Sq.ft. 36%. The minimum is 15 % therefor this criteria is met. The overall development site has 16969 Sq. ft. and has an effective tree canopy cover of 8884 sq.ft. 52% City minimum is 40% therefor the City requirement has been met. Tree preservation and removal site plan are enclosed. See attachments meeting Urban Forest Manual requirements. There are no new trees proposed to be planted. Signature of Approval We hereby attest to the best of our Knowledge: The attached tree preservation and removal site plans meet all the requirements in section 10, partl and part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual The attached tree canopy site plan meets all the requirements in section 10, part 2 of the Urban Forestry manual. This Supplemental report meets all the requirements in section 10, part 3 of the urban forestry manual. Rob Crouch Community Tree, LLC. Certified Arborist, (cert. #PNW-366A). Signature Date z, r \ \' " au6 trees /�, eff ct ve �Opy area.The minitnt i n is 15 th 1 - rya a �y ;, n tcacre two trees having an effective canopy of Vl therefor this criteria is met. vratdevelopment site has 16969 t. and has ars effective tree cane { sq.ft. 52% City minimum is 40%therefor the City requirement titin and removal site plan are enclosed. See attachments rrt : rban crest Manual requirements, pg ,A are no new trees proposed to be planted, �r rY nature of Approval %'. � reby attest to the best of our Knowledge. , ttached tree preservation and removal site plans meet all the require IM, $: ec�rr 10, pard and part 3 of the urban Forestry Manual attached tree canopy site plan meets all the requirements in sectio,, Q, Ur p Forestry manual. a ernrtfi r �meet a t requirements in eCi,53, io 1If, �,. N �g,at y manticra. ( Y rrtttllty Tr < C�rtifred Arbcrs " I.INTRODUCTION Rob Crouch Community Tree, LLC. (RCCT) conducted an inventory of trees more than 6 inches in diameter and prepared the following arborist's report for Georg Deoca.The data was collected on May 21, 2015. II.PROJECT LOCATION The residential property is located 9230 SW 74th Ave.Tigard, OR 97223. �ECE�v�� III. METHODS AUG 17 2015 The inventory and report was prepared by certified arborist Rob Crouch of CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING/ENGINEERING RCCT.(International Society of Arboriculture certification #PNW-366A). Inventory Methods All trees having a diameter of 6 inches or greater at approx. 4.5 ft.height(DBH) were inventoried and numbered.The map located in the appendices show the trees and corresponding number. Information recorded for each of these trees included tree number, species, DBH, Average Canopy area in Sq.ft.height and condition. In the case of multi-trunk trees,all the DBH of the trunks were added together.All trees are open grown. None of the trees are Heritage trees.Tree conditions were rated#3 good, #2fair, or#1poor,as defined in the Urban Forest Manual. Table 1 Inventory inventory # name species D.B.H. Canopy Open Cond. Pres.R Pres. 1 Engleman Picea 26" 876 51' 3. 3. Y Spruce englemanii 2 Shore Pine Pinus 16" 480 37' 3. 3. Y contorta 3 Western Thuja 32" 564 68' 3. 3. N Red Cedar plicata 4 Douglas- Pseudotsuga 30" 805 97' 3. 3. N Fir menziesii 1-1\ -�-. 5 Douglas- Pseudotsuga 26" 996 120' 3. 3. N Fir menziesii 6 Douglas- Pseudotsuga 32" 1054 127' 3. 3. N Fir menziesii 7 Douglas- Pseudotsuga 28" 1139 139' 3. 3. N Fir menziesii 8 Douglas- Pseudotsuga 25" 992 121' 3. 3. N Fir menziesii 9 Douglas- Pseudotsuga 24" 971 117' 3. 3. N Fir menziesii 10 Douglas- Pseudotsuga 33" 1045 126' 3. 3. N Fir menziesii 11 Douglas- Pseudotsuga 23" 1062 128' 3. 3. N Fir menziesii 12 Douglas- Pseudotsuga 19" 1037 125' 3. 3. N Fir menziesii 13 Douglas- Pseudotsuga 12" 290 35' 2. 3. N Fir menziesii 14 Douglas- Pseudotsuga 14" 464 56' 2. 2. N Fir menziesii 15 Douglas- Pseudotsuga 19" 1004 121' 3. 3. N Fir menziesii 16 Douglas- Pseudotsuga 37" 1145 138' 3. 3. N Fir menziesii 17 Douglas- Pseudotsuga 39" 1177 142' 3. 3. N Fir menziesii 18 Douglas- Pseudotsuga 27" 1004 121' 3. 3. Y Fir menziesii 19 Douglas- Pseudotsuga 23" 431 52' 2. 2. Y Fir menziesii 20 Douglas- Pseudotsuga 16" 506 61' 2. 2. Y Fir menziesii 21 Douglas- Pseudotsuga 33' 1145 138' 3. 3. Y Fir menziesii Lot# Sq.Ft. 2X Canopy Effective Cano Lot 1 7502Sq.ft. 2712 Sq-ft- 36% Lot 2 7502Sq.ft. 6172Sq ft 82% Total 15004Sq.ft. 8884Sq ft 52% Develop. „r t PRELIMINARY 2—PARCEL PARTITION EXISTING FEATURES PLAN / PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Trees Proposed for I LOCATED 1N THE SE X ” •,• OF SECTION 2b. TTS, RIW. W.M. Preservation: n IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON DAT[: MAY 19,2011 SCALE- I*.2C #1: 26„ Engelmann Spruce CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING FILE NO. #2: 16” Shore Pine #18: 27" Douglas Fir WIT #19: 23" Douglas Fir #20: 16" Douglas Fir VICINITY MAP #21: 33"Douglas Fir k All other trees proposed for removal r L of TV w .4f TaILOT Nae w Lot 23W ...4•. - ,• '.AV Stl W lir l0/}WO a,y� 1 \ t •rx•• '+•!� 1 }y, TIMM01w'!11.11' PP 2003-042 _ .. 'Ta+' IIO�C 100 ,RIFT '+-`. ,I ', �7 1'•+, ,, -,.' '-• awn mew rata,! , ;• PARCEL 2 1 7.502-SF . ` rrt `t 110117m No= "Cum" 9 WALL SF t , � �` w *ARM, I i� �' ',� 7.302�6XaU0n�9, ACCESS EAtiEN01T) PP 2007 i \ c �• for 3 : 1 7112 Vn m,r \ \. rem I \ EL-2B0.1T lac I,ar 3M ►M1C6 4 ( \ Tal LOT 1101 CITY OF TIGARD Approved by Planning .CUM o„ry/Doom W. Date: Pwm OW4341-010 Initials: Z -S �^1' o.Ir w W rM.r jm)wael 1 AVIM 07/01/13 rIh22hT01>O.OwC jOi x: 11-19-13 PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six (6) Months) Afeeting Date: 5/5/15 Staff Present: CAC/ GB RESIDENTIAL APPLICANT: George Deoca AGENT: Phone: 503-341-4023 Phone: PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: 9230 SW 7e Ave. TAX MAPS)/LOT#(S): 1S125DB02800 NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: Minor Land Partition (MLP) PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: 2 lot partition COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential ZONING MAP DESIGNATION:R-4.5 ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18. 510) MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 7.500 sq. ft. Average Min. lot width: 50 ft. Max. building height: 30 ft. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: - %. Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area:_%. Setbacks: Front: 20 ft. Side: 5 ft. Rear: 15 ft. Street side: 15 ft. Garage: 20 ft. ❑ NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, INTERESTED PARTIES, AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. * NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 Residential Application/Planning Division Section ® NARRATIVE (Refer to Code Chapter 18.390) The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. ® IMPACT STUDY (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050) As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE AN IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address,at a minimum,the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type ofimpact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedicarion requirement, or provide e�ndence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. ® ACCESS (Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.765) Minimum number of accesses: 1 arcel Minimum access width: 15 ft. Minimum pavement width: 10 ft ❑ WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.705) Within all ATTACHED HOUSING (except two-family dwellings) and multi-family developments, each residential dwelling SHALL BE CONNECTED BY WALKWAY TO THE VEHICULAR PARKING AREA, COMMON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION FACILITIES. ® RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULATION (Refer to Code Chapter 18.715) —See example below. The NET RESIDENTIAL UNITS ALLOWED on a particular site may be calculated by dividing the net area of the developable land by the minimum number of square feet required per dwelling unit as specified by the applicable zoning designation. Net development area is calculated by subtracting the following land area(s) from the total site area: All sensitive lands areas including: ➢ Land within the 100-year floodplain; Slopes exceeding 25%; y Drainageways;and Wetlands for the R-1,R-2,R-3.5,R-4.5 and R-7 zoning districts. Public right-of-wad dedication: Single-family allocate 20%of gross acres for public facilities;or Multi-family allocate 15% of gross acres for public facilities;or If available,the actual public facility square footage can be used for deduction. All land proposed for private Streets SEE NOTES FOR ESTIMATED DENSITY CALCULATIONS. EXAMPLE OF RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULATIONS: EXAMPLE: USING A ONE ACRE SITE IN THE R-12 ZONE (3,050 MINIMUM LOT SIZE)WITH NO DEDUCTION FOR SENSITIVE LANDS Single-Family Multi-Family 43,560 sq. ft. of gross site area 43,560 sq. ft. of gross site area 8,712 sq. ft. (20%) for12ublic right-of-way 6,534 sq. ft. (150 o) for public right-of-way NET: 34,848 square feet NET: 37,026 square feet 3.050 (minimum lot areal - 3,050 (mill lot areal 11.4 Units Per Acre (maximum) = 12.1 Units Per Acre (maximum) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 Residential Application/Planning Division Section • The Development Code requires that the net site area exist for ule next whole dwelling unit. NO ROUNDING UP IS PERMITTED. • Minimum Project Density is 80% of the maximum allowed density. TO DETERMINE, MULTIPLY THE MAXIMUM BY .8. ® SPECIAL SETBACKS (Refer to Code Section 18.730) STREETS: feet from the centerline of ➢ FLAG LOT: A TEN (10)-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK applies to all primary structures. Y ZERO LOT LINE LOTS: A minimum of a ten (10)-foot separation shall be maintained between each dwelling unit or garage. Y MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL building separation standards apply within multiple-family residential developments. ACCESSORY STRUCTURES UP TO 528 SQUARE FEET in size may be permitted on lots less than 2.5 acres in size. Five (5)-foot minimum setback from side and rear lot lines. ACCESSORY STRUCTURE UP TO 1,000 SQUARE FEET on parcels of at least 2.5 acres in size. (See applicable zoning district for the primary structures' setback requirements.) ® FLAG LOT BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.730) MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 1'/2 STORIES or 25 feet,whichever is less in most zones;2'/a stories, or 35 feet in R-7,R-12,R-25 or R-40 zones provided that the standards of Section 18.730.010.C.2 are satisfied. ❑ BUFFERING AND SCREENING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.745) In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the CITY REQUIRES LANDSCAPED BUFFER AREAS along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFERS applicable to your proposal area is: Buffer Level along north boundary. Buffer Level along east boundary. Buffer Level along south boundary. Buffer Level along west boundary. SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: ® STREET TREES & PARKING LOT TREES (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745 and 18.765) STREET TREES SHALL BE REQUIRED AS PART OF THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR A CONDITIONAL USE ('TYPE III), DOWNTOWN DESIGN REVIEW (TYPE II & III), MINOR LAND PARTITION (TYPE 1I), PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (TYPE III), SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ('TYPE II), AND SUBDIVISION (TYPE II & III). The mini num number of required street trees shall be determined by dividing the linear amount of street frontage within or adjacent to the site (in feet) by 40 feet (if the number is a fraction, round to the nearest whole number). The trees shall be placed within the public right-of-way whenever possible but no more than six (6) feet from the right-of-way boundary. Street trees shall be planted according to Section 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual and adequate soil volumes shall be provided in accordance with Section 12 of the Urban Forestry Manual. Existing trees may be used to meet the street standards. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. PARKING LOT TREES ARE REQUIRED AS PART OF THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR A CONDITIONAL USE (TYPE III), DOWNTOWN DESIGN REVIEW (TYPE II & III), PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (TYPE III),AND SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (TYPE II). All parking areas,including parking spaces and aisles, shall be required to achieve at least 30% tree canopy cover at maturity directly above the CITY OF TIG ARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 Residential Application/Planning Division Section parking area in accordance with Section 13 of the Urban Forestry Manual. , ❑ RECYCLING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.755) Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Pride Disposal can be reached at(503) 625-6177. ® PARKING (Refer to Code Chapters 18.765 &18.705) ALL PARKING AREAS AND DRIVEWAYS MUST BE PAVED. Single-family............ Requires: One (1) off-street parking space per dwelling unit; and One (1) space per unit less than 500 square feet. Multiple-family.........Requires: 1.25 spaces per unit for 1 bedroom; 1.5 spaces per unit for 2 bedrooms;and 1.75 spaces per unit for 3 bedrooms. Multi-family dwelling units with more than ten (10) required spaces shall provide parking for the use of guests and shall consist of 15% of the total required parking. NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. Parking stalls shall be dimensioned as follows: i> Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet. 6 inches 118 feet, 6 inches. J> Compact parking space dimensions: ' 7 feet. 6 inches X 16 feet, 6 inches. ➢ Handicapped parking: All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces. The minunum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. ❑ BICYCLE RACKS (Refer to Code Section 18.765) BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. ❑ SENSITIVE LANDS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.775) The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas, and their boundaries is the responsibility of the applicant Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS SOME RESIDENTIAL RELATED DEVELOPMENT IS EXEMPT ❑ STEEP SLOPES (Refer to Code Section 18.775.070.C) When STEEP SLOPES exist,prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-_application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8 Residential Applicatinn,/Planning Division Section --r -1 r ® CLEANWATER SERVICES (CWS) Service Provider Letter PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the CWS R&O 07-20 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. ❑ SIGNS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.780) SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for SiPermits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may-re permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. ® URBAN FORESTRY PLAN (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.0 and the "Tree Canopy Requirements" Brochure) AN URBAN FORESTRY PLAN IS REQUIRED FOR THE FOLLNWING TYPES OF DEVELOPMENT: Conditional Use (Type III);Downtown Design Review(Type 11 and III);Minor Land Partition (Type II); Planned Development (Type III); Sensitive Lands Review (Type II and 111); Site Development Review (Type II); and Subdivision (Type II and 111). The plan needs to be prepared by an ISA certified arborist or landscaped architect. Percentage of mature canopy cover required: 40% for the overall development site and 15% for any lot or tract (&fer to 1-14pendix•2-6 in Urban Forestry Manual or a list of trees avid)Tnature cano�y cover areas) An urban forestry plan shall: - Be coordinated and approved by a landscape architect (the project landscape architect) or a person possessing dual certifications as a certified arborist and certified tree risk assessor (the project arborist); - Meet the tree preservation and removal site plan standards in Section 10, part 1 of the Urban Forestry Manual; - Meet the tree canopy site plan standards in Section 10,part 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual;and - Meet the supplemental report standards in Section 10,part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual. TREE CANOPY FEE. If the effective percentage of tree canopy cover cannot be met, the applicant shall provide the city a tree canopy fee according to the methodology outlined in Section 10, part 4 of the Urban Forestry Manual. 18.790.040-Discretionary Urban Forestry Plan Review Option In lieu of providing payment of a tree canopy fee when less than the standard effective tree canopy cover required by Section 10, part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual will be provided, an applicant may apply for a discretionary urban forestry plan review. The discretionary urban forestry plan review cannot be used to modify an already approved urban forestry plan, any tree preservation or tree planting requirements established as part of another land use review approval, or any tree preservation or tree planting requirements required by another chapter in this title. ® PRESERVATION OF EXISTING TREES (Refer to Code Section 18.790.050.C.) To assist in the preservation and/or planting of trees and significant tree groves, the director may apply one or more of the following flexible standards as part of the land use review approval. Use of the flexible standards shall be requested by the project arborist or landscape architect as part of the land use review process. The flexible standards are only applicable to trees that are eligible for credit towards the effective tree canopy cover of the site. Appropriate species of trees in good condition and suitable for preservation receive a 200 percent credit based on their existing canopy area. Refer to Section 11-Part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual for subnuttal requirements. ® CLEAR VISION AREA (Refer to Code Chapter 18.795) The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND CITY OF TIGARD Pre-.application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 Residential Applications Planning Division Section EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIG T at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of ` the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. The applicant shall show the clear vision areas on the site plan, and identify any obstructions in these areas. ® FUTURE STREET PLAN AND EXTENSION OF STREETS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.030.F.) A FUTURE STREET PLAN shall: ➢ Be filed by the applicant in conjunction with an application for a subdivision or partition. The plan shall show the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division and shall include boundaries of the proposed land division and shall include other parcels within 200 feet surrounding and adjacent to the proposed land division. ➢ Identify existing or proposed bus routes, pullouts or other transit facilities, bicycle routes and pedestrian facilities on or within 500 feet of the site. Where necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed. ® ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.060) MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/ TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. ® BLOCKS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.040) The perimeter of BLOCKS FORMED BY STREETS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2,000 FEET measured along the right-of-way center line except where street location is precluded by natural topography,wetlands or other bodies of water or,pre-existing development. When block lengths greater than 330 feet are permitted, pedestrian/bikeways shall be provided through the block. CODE CHAPTERS ❑ 18.330(Conditional use) ❑ 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) ❑ 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) ❑ 18.340(Director's Interpretation) ❑ 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) ® 18.765(off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) ❑ 18.350(Planned Development) ❑ 18.640(Durham Quarry Design Standards) ❑ 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) ❑ 18.360(Site Development Review) ® 18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation) ❑ 18.780(Signs) ❑ 18.370(variances/Adjustments) ❑ 18.710(Accessory Residential units) ❑ 18.785(Temporary use Permits) ❑ 18.380(zoning Map/rext Amendments) ® 18.715(Density Computations) ® 18.790(urban Forestry Plan) ❑ 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) ❑ 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) ® 18.795(visual Clearance Areas) ® 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) ❑ 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) ❑ 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) ❑ 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) ❑ 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) ® 18.810(Street&utility Improvement Standards) ® 18.420(Land Partitions) ❑ 18.740(Historic Overlay) ❑ 18.430(Subdivisions) ❑ 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) ® 18.510(Residential zoning Districts) ® 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) ❑ 18.520(Commercial zoning Districts) ❑ 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) ❑ 18.530(industrial zoning Districts) ❑ 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) CITY OF TIG_ARD Pre-.Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 Residential Application/Planning Division Secnnn ADDITIONAL CONCERNS Ox COMMENTS: Please note that these notes only highlight code standards related to the proposal but do not reflect all applicable code standards. Please review each code section marked in the list above on page 6 to determine all applicable standards Three copies of all materials are required for the original submittal The initial completeness review can be up to 30 days. Additional completeness reviews may be necessary. Once an application is deemed complete then the application review will begin. Estimated Density Calculations: Gross Square Footage 16,969 Estimated Lot Area—ex. Home 7.503 Estimated Access Easement 1,840 Sensitive Lands (in other areas) --- Net Developable Area 7,626 Minimum lot size 7,500 sq ft = 1 additional units maximum, 1 minimum Two street trees are required along the SW 74th Avenue frontage. An urban forestry plan and report are required per 18.790 unless the applicant can demonstrate compliance with effective tree canopy cover and soil volume requirements byphnting trees in open soil volumes Specific requirements for the canopy cover, soil volumes, and the urban forests 121an/report are found in Section 10 of the Urban Forestry Manual (http://wxv<v.tigard-or.gov/commuiiity/trees/docs/urban forestr3- manual) Flag lot side yard setback - 10 feet. Maximum height is 1-1/2 stories or 25 feet whichever is less, except maximum height may be 2-1/2 stories or 35 feet,whichever is less,provided: a) the proposed dwelling otherwise complies with applicable height and dimensional requirements of the zoning district: b) a 10-foot side yard setback will be preserved: Q a residential structure on any abutting lot either is located 50 feet or more from the nearest point of the subject dwelling or the residential structure exceeds 1-1/2 stories or 25 feet in height;and d) windows 15 feet or more above grade shall not face dwelling unit windows or patios on any abutting lot unless the proposal includes an agreement to plant trees capable of mitigating direct views, or that such trees exist and will be preserved. PROCEDURE E] Administrative Staff Review. Fj Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. II Public hearing before the Planning Commission. II Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Awlications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. The Planning counter closes at 5:00 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 81/2" x 11". One, 81/2" x 11" map of a proposed project shall also be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Applications with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 Residential Application/Planning Division Section The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard Hearing's Officer . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. SUBDIVISION PLAT NAME RESERVATION (County Surveyor's Office: 503-648-8884) PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A SUBDIVISION LAND USE APPLICATION with the City of Tigard, applicants are required to complete and file a subdivision plat naming request with the Washington County Surveyor's Office in order to obtain approval/reservation for any subdivision name. Applications Nvill not be accepted as complete until the City receives the faxed confirmation of approval from the County of the Subdivision Name Reservation. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first buildina vermit issued in the develo ment (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVEL PER AT THE TIME THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site Ethat should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: Cheryl Caines CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION - STAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: 503-718-2437 EMAIL: cherylc@tigard-or.gov CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 Residential Application/Planning Division Section PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES Is➢ DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING Q OWNIT118KOreW Community(Development Shaping.$MWCommwdty PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Map(s): IM2511 Tax taus): 2800 Usa TV08: 111145 The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project and are subject to change as the project develops and is better understood. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ® SW 74`h Av (classified as a Neighborhood Route) to a half-width of 27 feet wide from centerline From tax maps, it appears that there is currently 25 feet of width from centerline. ❑ SW to feet ❑ SW to feet ❑ SW to feet The applicant will need to demonstrate that adequate access will be provided to each lot in accordance with 18.705, which requires 10'paved within a 15' width. An adjustment would be necessary for the 13'width. The applicant will need to demonstrate that the subject property has access to a public street, likely by demonstrating rights and shared maintenance responsibilities to use the shared driveway. The applicant will need to provide findings addressing the street connectivity requirements of 18.810.030 and 110 and the exception criteria therein. CITY OF TIURD Pre4loplication Coderence Notes Page 1 of 5 oemlopnunt bolneednp Street improvements: (Subic,to rough proportionality' ) `.. ® SW 70 Av. to a half-width of 16 feet with curb sidewalk planter strip street trees and street lights in accordance with 18.810 standards A restrictive covenant may be required _18.730.040 Additional Setback Requirements: This section sets requirements for additional setback distance from roadways. The minimum yard requirement shall be increased in the event a yard abuts a street having a right-of-way width less than required by its functional classification on the city's transportation plan map and, in such case, the setback shall be not less than the setback required by the zone plus one-half of the projected road width as shown on the transportation map. This appears to not be applicable in this case. _Agreement for Future Street Improvements: In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to provide a future improvement guarantee. The City Engineer will determine the form of this guarantee. The following street improvements may be eligible for such a future improvement guarantee: (1.) This does not appear to be applicable in this case See 18.810.030A for criteria (2.) Overhead Utility Lines: ® Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, if approved by the City Engineer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is approved, it is equal to $ 35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. See 18.810.120 for criteria for fee-in-lieu. As the utilities are overhead on the other side of the street, the fee-in-lieu is applicable. The fee would be (59.96' +3.00) x 35 = $2,203.60 Sanitary Sewers: The applicant will need to connect these properties to the public sewer system in accordance with city standards, including paying appropriate connection fees. A sewer is available in SW 74th Av. Water Supply: The Tualatin Valley Water District provides public water service in this area. Coordinate with TVWD for information regarding adequate water supply for the proposed development. CITY OF TIURD Pre4oplication Conference Notes Page 2 of 5 geuelepmem Engineering Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District [Contact: John Wolff, 503-259-1504] provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. Provide a plan that shows how the storm drainage system for the site connects to the public system and how the development would meet the standards of Clean Water Services and other applicable standards. Appropriate Storm drainage plan and calculations shall be submitted with the application for it to be considered complete. Storm Water Quality: Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (Resolution and Order No. 07-20) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof. Please contact the Building Division for the current fee. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ® Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ❑ Payment of the fee in-lieu. Review and comply with provisions of Chapter 4 Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (Runoff Treatment and Control). Table 4-1 of Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards applies. Other Comments: Water quality and detention facility design and construction must be certified by a professional engineer as meeting Clean Water Services requirements. After completion of the construction of these facilities, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the city on city-furnished forms for long-term maintenance of the facilities. This agreement will be recorded and city staff will be periodically inspecting the facilities for compliance with the terms of the agreement. CITY OF TIGADD Pre4polication Conference Notes Page 3 of 5 Weteesent Fe9ineeMe! TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT�,J %W In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) which was replaced in 2008 by a Transportation Development Tax (TDT) that became effective 7/1/09. The TDT program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TDT incorporates the proposed use of the land and the size of the project. The TDT is calculated, due, and payable at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances payment of the TDT may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TDT exceeds the TDT rate for a single-family home. Pay TDT as required. PERMITS Public Facility Improvement (PFI) Permit: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a PFI permit from Development Engineering. A PFI permit application is available at the Planning/Engineering counter in the Permit Center at City Hall. For more extensive work such as street widening improvements, main utility line extensions or subdivision infrastructure, plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The PFI permit application shall include any on-site water quality and detention facilities that may be required as part of the land use approval. The Permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security. Where professional engineered plans are required, the Permittee must execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement, which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. The PFI permit fee structure is as follows: NOTE: If an PFI Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building DIVISIon. A PFl permit is required for this project. This permit must be obtained before any work begins on site. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Nates Page 4 of 5 Development Engineering Master Pel . (MST). This permit is issued for . single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. PREPARED BY: Greg Berry 5/5/14 DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER DATE Phone: 15031718-2468 E-mail: greg@tigard-or.gou Revised: March 2012 I:\ENG\Development Engineering\74th Ave\Preapp-9230 DeOca Partition 5-27-15.docx CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 5 Development Engineering TDT Estimate PRE2015-00030 4/23/2015 Deoca Partition, 9230 SW 74th Ave., 1S125DBO2800 TDT RATES EFFECTIVE 10/1/14 Former Use Use# ITE Code #Units Rate TDT Amount Description 1 210 1.00 $8,036 $8,036 1 SFR 2 $0 Total TDT Former Use $8,036 Proposed Use Use# ITE Code # Units Rate TDT Amount Description 1 210 2.00 $8,036 $16,072 2 SFR 2 3 Total TDTProposed Use $16,072 Less: Total TDT Former Use $8,036 TDT Increase(Decrease) $8,036 Recovery Rate for Proposed Use 29.9% Estimated Total Impact $26,876 Estimated Unmitigated Impact $18,840 PARKS Estimate PARKS RATES EFFECTIVE 7/1/14 Former Use Use# ITE Code #Units Rate Parks Amount Description 1 210 1.00 $6,451.34 $6,451.34 1 SFR 2 Total Parks Former Use $6,451.34 Proposed Use Use# ITE Code # Units Rate Parks Amount Description 1 210 2.00 $6,451.34 $12,902.68 2 SFR 2 3 TotalParks Proposed Use $12,902.68 Less: Total Parks Former Use $6,451.34 Parks Increase(Decrease) $6,451.34 P IK" a City of Tigard COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT i Pre-Application Conference Request PROJECT DESCRI ION REQUIRED SUBMITTAL Project name/title: �2 3C) ,�'� 7 �'� ELEMENTS Please write a brief description of proposed project: (Note: applications will not be accepted / �(� lG;/(, without the required submittal elements) P�re'c' ( ! hU ill) .� 3 . �� { �v/?.�l!? 7 �-s 6 COPIES OF EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: c?T r/G'4 /7 1 rt- /t /s•r e/4 e6�J ❑ Brief description of the proposal and any site-specific questions/issues that 2— 7e. g e .7 roo you would like to have staff research PROPERTY INFORMATION or to the meeting. �} Site Plan.The site plan must shoo-the Property- address/location(s): 5 -,&j223o J -71 .#4,e proposed lots and/or building layouts drawn to scale. Also,show the location of the subject property in relation to the nearest streets;and the Tax map and tax lot #(s l: e©67 locations of driveways on the subject roperty and across the street. Zoning: V tanity�\Iap. PROPERTY +OWNER/HOLDER INFORMATION e Proposed Uses. Name(s): C eor2e Defoe 4- Tdpographic Information. �{nclude Contour Lines if Possible. 2-f& �w 7ce Phone: � ®/Filin Fee. Address: ��3 ` 3�f '�G''� g City/state: Zip: APPLICANT INFORMATION FOR 81AFF USE ONLY Name: &t'e,s j( AC el 4 Case No.:PR.E2016- 00030 Address: 1L�� `�W 7K /���' Phone: 574:'s Related Case No.(s): City/state: Zip: Z�L Z✓� Application fee: `Qa Contact person: Ger, /� c✓c�r _ APPaccepted: Phone: -1 'Y `yG�3 Email: ` 4 2 , Byh Date: Pre-application Conference Information Date of pre-app: All of the information identified on this form is required and must be Time ofP PPre-a = 'k00 submitted to the Planning Division a minimum of ten(10) days prior to officially scheduling a pre-application conference. Pre-application Planner assigned to pre-app: _ conferences are one (1) hour long and are ty=pically-held between the lACURPU4\Masters\Land Use Applications Rev.01t0E/2015 hours of 9-11 a.m. on either Tuesday or Thursday mornings. Pre-application conferences must be scheduled in person at the Community Development counter from 8--4:30 p.m. Monday-Thursday. If more than four(4)people are expected to attend the pre-application conference in your group, please inform the city in advance so that alternate room arrangements can be made to accommodate the group. City of Tigard • 13125 SAY'Hall Blvd. • Tigard,Oregon 97223 • w-ww.tigard-or.gov • 503-718-2421 • Page 1 of 1 --I --. George Deoca 9230 SW 74th ave I would like to Minor Partition my property, Dividing my 16969 Sq.ft. lot into two Lots. The Front Lot would be 7503 Sq.ft. not including the 15' X 122.7' Driveway for the pole section of the Flag. The Rear Lot would be 7501 Sq.ft. The proposed Pole section of the Flag would be Approx. 122.7' X 15' Meeting the fire Dept. Standards The Front house will be slightly modified to accommodate all setbacks. Please see attached Proposed plots. Thank you George Deoca I RECORD OF SURVEY WA Nl COUNTY -•--so5WfaWw&WPROPERTY UNE ADJI.RIMENT CIM LOCATED IN THE SE 14 ADCWM I=RM N6Y H Y 19x7 OF SEW25, 71S. M W.M. IN THE CITY OF TIGARD. WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON DAM APML 2.2015 SLUM V-20' PARCEL 2 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING FILE NO. LLA2014-00012 TAX LOT EM AREA BEFORE IN LM�ADAMIMM. R AREA Arm AO,EISIIIEHT-7,000 i 51.R • TAX IDT]WO q/�` TAIt IDT Y550 QOM`_ 1N7 rNorn71T IqR NO CA��107M IROS IM no Lar unnn tow asr a ar, -M ua TM wY am a a�iio"aZi 1 yr=CAP RAM us 10 s ADAM= NWZI% W 27a1r M50 POR Nw II I- M.P9pS 5N 2000`5 PARCEL t N ARG so=IAT ssisAA0AIsil!"-10AM w g Allo ArilR ADAlslllolr.1sou s PANee I 5R 2W-055 Im s go a%"valir IIW3" Pea1 PM �n ca561 31r pyi7�on x K TAf!Im as 55uuvAl�d 16555 PALM s TAN IDT 56! LEGEND J • MM ras56I7 As WM 16m5w w�rrq �f 0 ars�w w MON M WN VW w risme 'see o�aP aP Wiwm•Aar 00-MM!,W 4p/M9 n 5a►-= WAN M"IM w1N MM MM aw OU MWAas OMW 5Nwa11 ON *pain MWAW vmn w NMI=5N*Na r N6aTa MM W%9 5AKM I 9N P6atn 5UNI5T NAllOC lsACfAYAS g51N1n 51*1RT NsooN55 NARRATIVE Mr In amw a 19 pip AAPPN5wrsln aAM61T 110.1 gWIR7 OO<aN61T K 5/r ON Naw o NSr s�i�nsa Mr a TaANo Pw**q -11 "a gats,r-sa �R1 As Ns m*a1 soff-M16D ra 1vw MMO�N.wAv�aN"N M- 1z m s�`m W.— MM, a >a sr a w usF6o Ar A1*c M au w a Tis rMw W7 sEoavNrr[p 1r 1Nsnw/ e Ad wsM r°PNoPOTe�vi I s M WM LNi a TNL 5W6�'6 Sgofp Ogoa � isa�a�O N�assa°iq�aZ 5x1110 01�M5D POR TNL Nw16 IN<R TNI*NFRDI 5511M llwggE51W R F15N1w15.(M. imy nq. enn ip I 11[�11L M N �y.SOT Wo"WAS!f q07 and 9 Englnwdnp AT OM►MNL AINI ww0ae a" Commqa qYP .0.BOH q55 5ond7,00 97055 �5 11w15RM An l5�* MILT rfec(Whome, I999-4750663 1 5u wt ie RENEWS 07/01/15 DWO PNIMBIRI 14-924-IWQDWO OA1E OF RAP 4-3-2015 7-77 i TAX LOT 2100 AREA BEFORE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT- ':8,219 ' AREA AFTER ADJUSTMENT - :1,930 PROPOSED LOT LINE TO BE HELD PARALLEL TO EXI5TING HOUSE AND 5' FROM CONCRETE FOUNDATION A5 5HOWN. EXT.HOUSE EXISTING LOT LINE I,. c X2.05———— z- '—L` IEASENT 3.29' 15'ACCE55 5' 5' F t EASEMENT v I I - 1._' `I9.:AC4`E95 .10:PAvg7.: 155.1' A'LANDSCAPE EA4 M IT MIgLAUA, O X ( 4.19' T.5.22' PARCEL I 9,343 SF PARCEL 2 1,503 5F(EXCLUDING 1,501 5F ACCESS EASEMENT) I :... c:.�,.`:�•, , :I 31.65' 3'1.65' ; 2�', -+---r 125' �/• EXISTING HOU5E LOCATION �� 21' 2'ROW DEDICATION 202.1' I ":I 5' 1. I C ( ( ., T 795JA i opr � p .. . . ,: - 741 i -R. }ti i ... 7 V wI , - -- "0Aft 'r h f yr • r t iyyr. '91 e M ' 9133 ` 91 ^�'tA 91.72 d" .\ it 9101ML 7200 > 205 9-210• 4 7160 9203 .+� a .. " A *0 e0$ �Ir' 9235 "v $225 `�.✓ 1 �r . ,. ii ♦Y;s���� :► &1111r wow 9221 �_�® Y {'> r . .. 445 9239 ' r 924 2 '7165 5 � . • o " .. 9260 z Ff t ^ lltff ys r 111 w k4 927,9 ,.}.. 415 74'1.1 � 74CT5 r' t : 7160 r., R ` t � 93�0�' 5 • � C, f 11 A R CP E 5 ? wry < f� .t " u 7210 7100. 7416 ! 74.08 t 91320 q a�410 • n 709As 0 i ! i ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS C City of Tigard June 11, 2018 George and Silka Deoca 9230 SW 741h Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Project: Deoca Partition Site: 9230 SW 74th Avenue;WCTM 1S125DB, Tax Lot 2800 Land Use File: MLP2015-00005 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Deoca, On February 23, 2017, you submitted a request to extend the above referenced land use approval,in accordance with Section 18.420.030.D of the Community Development Code of the City of Tigard. City staff responded on June 7,2017,and approved a one (1)year extension, which expired on June 8, 2018. Therefore, this land use approval has expired, and no further extensions will be granted. Please feel free to contact me at (503) 718-2438 or LinaCSLa)tigar�d-oror.gov should you have any questions. Sincerely, Lina Smith Assistant Planner Copy: MLP2015-00005 Land Use File Agnes Lindor,Associate Planner Jonny Gish, Senior Engineering Technician 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 0 www.tigard-or.gov z City of Tigard June 7,2017 George&Silka Deoca 9230 SW 74th Avenue Tigard,OR 97223 Re: Extension of Land Use Approval for Deoca Partition (Case No. MLP2015-00005) Dear Mr. and Mrs.Deoca, On February 23, 2017, you requested an extension of the approval period for the Deoca Partition (Case No. MLP2015-00005),and paid the associated$357 filing fee. The effective approval date for Case No. MLP2015-00005 was on December 8,2015 and is valid for an 18-month period through June 8,2017.The requested extension would be for one (1)year,or until June 8,2018. Pursuant to Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.420.030.D: The director shall, upon written request by the applicant and payment of the required fee, grant an extension of the approval period not to exceed one year provided that: a. No changes are made on the original plan as approved by the director; The applicant states that no changes are made on the original plan as approved under Case No. MLP2015-00005.This criterion is met. b. The applicant can show intent of recording the approved partition or lot line adjustment within the one-year extension period; and The applicant has given written intent to record the approved partition within the one-year extension period. This criterion is met. c. There have been no changes in the applicable comprehensive plan policies and ordinance provisions on which the approval was based. As noted in the original Type II decision, the approval was based upon the following Community Development Code Chapters: 18.390, 18.420, 18.510, 18.705, 18.715, 18.725, 18.730, 18.745, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. The applicant states there have been no changes in the applicable comprehensive plan policies and ordinance provisions on which the approval was based. Staff reviewed the period since the application 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 0 www.tigard-or.gov was submitted on August 17,2015,and found there were no substantive amendments to the applicable code sections during that period. Based on this review, staff concurs with the applicant and finds that no substantive, applicable changes have occurred to the Tigard Community Development Code on which the approval was based.This criterion is met. Conclusion: The applicant has submitted a written request for an extension of the approval period for the Deoca Partition (Case No. MLP2015-00005), and paid the associated $357 filing fee. The criteria for extensions have been met, as indicated in the findings above. Therefore, the applicant is granted an extension for Case No. MLP2015-00005 not to exceed one year, or until June 8,2018. If you have additional questions,please feel free to contact me at (503) 718-2438 or LinaCS a,tigard- or.gov. Thank you, Lina Smith Assistant Planner Copy: MLP2015-00005 Land Use File Albert Shields, City of Tigard Permit Coordinator FEES f ii 2011 To City of Tigard: Cl VY OF TiUkU Deoca Request for extension. 9230 SW 74th Ave Pi-AN ING/ NGINEERN( We would like to request an extension to our partition recording. No changes have been made to the original plan as approved by the director. We intend to record at the County within this extension period. There have been no changes to the applicable comprehensive plan policies and ordinance provisions on which the approval was based. Thank you. George Deoca 1 CITY OF TIGARD RECEIPT 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard OR 97223 503.639.4171 Project Name: Deoca Partition Site Address: 9230 SW 74TH AVE Receipt Number: 409045 - 02/23/2017 CASE NO. FEE DESCRIPTION REVENUE ACCOUNT NUMBER PAID MLP2015-00005 Approval Extension 100-0000-43116 $357.00 Total: $357.00 PAYMENT METHOD CHECK# CC AUTH.CODE ACCT ID CASHIER ID RECEIPT DATE RECEIPT AMT Check 2530 LSMITH 02/23/2017 $357.00 Payor: Solaris Solutions, LLC Total Payments: $357.00 Balance Due: $0.00 Page 1 of 1 "1 ."\ ■ City of Tigard September 24,2015 George Deoca 9230 SW 74th Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Completeness: Deoca Partition Case File No. MLP2015-00005 Dear Property Owner(s), The City has received your application for a Minor Land Partition to divide a 0.38-acre site, located at 9230 SW 74th Avenue,into two parcels. Staff has completed a preliminary review of the submittal materials, and determined that your application was complete as of September 10,2015, for the purpose of beginning the 120-day review period for final decision. The formal comment and review process typically takes between four to six weeks. It should be noted that staff has not reviewed the application submittal for compliance with the relevant code criteria, and that additional items may arise during the application review which may require further clarification. If you have any questions with regard to these items,please feel free to contact me at (503) 718-2438 or LinaCS(2tigard-or.gov. Sincerely, Lina Smith Assistant Planner CC: MLP2015-00005 Land Use File 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 0 www.tigard-or.gov ,--N City of Tigard September 1,2015 George Deoca 9230 SW 741h Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Completeness: Deoca Partition Case File No. MLP2015-00005 Dear Property Owner(s), The City has received your application for a Minor Land Partition to divide a 0.38-acre site, located at 9230 SW 74th Avenue, into two parcels. Staff has conducted a preliminary review of your submittal materials, and has determined that the following additional information is necessary before the application can be deemed complete: 1. Site Plan: The City of Tigard Engineering Division requests you revise your site plan to show: • Proposed sanitary sewer lines for Parcel 2. • Driveway culverts and ditch grading required to provide unobstructed storm drainage. For more information, review the attached Public Facility Plan Completeness Cbeck&t from the City of Tigard Engineering Division. If you have any questions with regard to these revisions, please contact Greg Berry, Project Engineer at (503) 718-2468 or g1eg9tigard-or.gov. 2. Copies of All Application Materials: Submit six (6) complete sets of all application materials (including full-sized,revised site plans). 3. Reduced-Sized Plans: Submit ten (10) sets of reduced-sized plans (on 8 '/z" x 11" or 11" x 17"paper). 4. Electronic Copies: Submit one (1) compact disc with electronic copies of all application materials 5. 500' Property Owner Notification Form: Complete the attached form and submit to 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 0 www.tigard-or.gov N%.W N%.. Joe Patton, Senior Administrative Specialist, at (503) 718-2714 or ioela,tixard oror.gov. If you have any questions with regard to these items, please feel free to contact me at (503) 718-2438 or LinaCS@tiga_ rid-or.gov. Sincerely, L Lina Smith Assistant Planner CC: MLP2015-00005 Land Use File LARGE PLANS FOR THIS FILE ARE IN THE RE-. CORDS ROOM