SDR9-77 A •
'� .� �. ,: ' ,� ,. .1.. .'� � •Ii..:,N. I+ ! 1 t t 1- i.. ..S•U.. �.1, F.4«�/.M3I1,�:+..mnid/.��,4<.�Mw,<r..:., •I
- .}. «:iAa. �,: ,„/J:r _w.: .,,,:tM«w4 ;�.:,lr�, «.� r la.v,. r.«x 41t w Gl� .+d a.xc.,, +ri,a..��a.,...+.,. ..i,{Hr”�•s:.•�:A�.l,.''s.w+.�„�..m.,...,•,:..�.�.u.,(i.�L.:.r,.,/.wlv..:..�.1 1/.k,-..ka; ...r.�,.. '
'r r I I ," 7 'tY •w4 w,
K/FO Esl/BUILtENG 1
$ite LDe'4Toio, me ge`V a tSDR 9 77)1
-
Greenburg ' toa `$had Lane , :
A 1 n � i
(� J 1 v Ix;,�•«-t.tw.=�rf,+A.,.,�.xr.+\f,�u;:..a,.dAt„_v+.+,...,..,rn.,.nMMd.,..ivl..-.Iti,.d�•.aNFI..hl
e t t,'.'off•/ w�wCwt
•
i I
r
Ir
1
•
•
•
'. '. //'''', . ' ' . ' 1 ' ' . , ,. ' . . ' . , ,. . .
r
. ti
f
' I
`i
,1
A
I' '
,
•
l
•
•
M•.
, r
r;
4.1
•, 1 . � , . ., ' A.. �. .. i r .: .:. .r •... .. ...al ...r.r..• :r mzwwr.. ..wv .•.. ... »u r.. .+ne i.�l,
.._t�Y. .tti- G .. .,:d k..wJ._. I..J_.r ..a,, AM4.4,4.,.. .... �«., .Y,..a,....,... MS._ ...,..a.„,ett.. «, .a 1,
.,,}...,-.. .
:• ,,.....
t" 1\1 T ri, f"" n r �, q j, !� �, �
d �' •.
tit\,.1 .r knJ? IaW� b:....YkL.r <aC:r ]-, • Y � �'.:^ :..f C�lh l>;.roW C1.'L'f R:',YI.t (SCIU .
i iwj yµ..tC 7 4 a,R`4e .A. U M h j
• ! is
m 1A!+T
CA �t .' {r y is,; A J i ,� v�. r". 1 W
tl' � r +�� tax "� DSI i ' ` � Y '� i �.1��' )f t � •` E. � ���.'�,�+� yt►
�,{ x' g��##,�yy�� • i� ���a j�+ yam+:< J „;f�...�;�(d..,. i n m.' $,1 r� a�k➢��it�1 y 9, yy
�. " �µt+rw�'d tF �.!, •,v ,ASI UVv C;c", �• ',P 1�+. '«� v.b.a,11'1.,'&�`t«d t t. 7 u 33)9 r `�}.'`i..i L�.�a Rq c .G"Ct�'.".:Ga W.
f4
q
r K °" wI `�"�` w
� 1't r� p
d�ryy ff �.� � >� � �r�$ �,�,� ���1�_4�r,.�,�'�� ����k..1.�!�� ������w� ,�.�,�,z� �� :��a�ir��v°
011 .''x 6{'
• a N' �, fli Ma 1�,y" p14 ��� ��t" �4 r�' .�.:�;�{yt�y t• y .q M, n py If I""a,.. M�7n-' r "� FNON R w W
>.r J "ALL o J,F1 '� w �, t 4:11\'''l '
�
,) ar t" 01'
A {x f' �{ N �y� �y )a
h J
- .!lM1 d.11��6B.IP,��Ewr k,w.,� rvP J,.�'��l{f r.�v� �..'„���4 ;.a
• ,r
n..,. , - ' a' .
N
:i. J-r`tG�w} •+., w
($
I ()II, i',+° .1 1 � tw ,. 1
' s
Approved , , l'�"G ',Gi`rC9 '� Vr'L�t `;G q � (,,ary�of I r �8�{.�; k
a
"�try rygy J� �y�;{ } T y� •�y� y��y�p
n )w APr4�FhO A1,, 1J,I` 1Ir 1'1,)1,;i1.)1'PlT�.t'rp y, ,�llG� 6��.�fir';pj�6� is g p
"C:1 la t e� �:' !9 "1.Ib w .,'` 7' �'� � �, ,Yq+ �1M� I d, d t1'� '; "���`�' ���rrGh',ir' z tO.
' - 1 n M1 t I .� I � tq , � t�.. � � '4�!Y
dj,1,7 �Id �.��'�,w.•.a1 +'C�Y' ,`,11 4,) 4 a �' , y +'«r i"'+I,t$
rf r1 i9{i +:.p ry
!(wr 1• i4.�t
• .1 " b`i7 1 P, :t,+i t iAA1•'l, I'��+1� At l
Y1.� 'Iw'P�, t114- I 'f Jf 1(t�. I 1/-111I a y d•I-,y¢��; ,r. �, �'i h�..!") ,,� l:y'.'i ^'• I+t
'r' 4.1 R� � xs 411 O. 1►�I,t��'w r' ! " .�,'I a ,. �� )1' �° ;�
,
• (o) 1A,4,t i,J (*,,,,or?!(",”.7 . " 1 !,I t- 1B Iti '�II
`
�y '
�Y'1tJ
W
o gq
, �"1'fat`I1"4""e t "I�i� M'rt"R,-1A1 l,i�("4 d� I,f"-" i A i " 1 4 f,.4'r�r�''
I I
,
. G", k�t1y'''e►I�Jtlt) t R, Icll��i'1 �). rn �;F fi; uYi'p.'rd k �. 'J 4 °,. �,Jr ' (
I¢��„SY �'t1,J .,w a I,r a ,r.'''
,
A
•, a
I ,t, "'X JA 1 �i” Ad't a',11 r"�' i Je•.�� "'�! ; I, i"
,) 14C,l1.1 n''I 1a"Vi 40 nal ,{i,I W M k p AA p, yv'
• C• 1"1p"• 1.4� 1,r I
'y A�°p C�i" i 4� bey" !';C1t t°+� s Iu i�'t • r t•° :, i P.
is
I. '°Wit Yli?1114 i"M#J1114" `fit jS ISI•
•
Y THE
1,ON ���a>A r 4°, „4"Ixr 'lir 1i 4b' "�` 'Vk till'', '� e,v� t -,d� � k t. t11't,'( ,J,i A(pC1!k1"1'"�Nt4 T
t, "F1 !'`1r7 d tt�lu �r yqn� 4tr� 1 � ( t'YY �ttittllw w I;nrW 1 -TIN) li;�
11!!((LL y� �'[[4 w4 y\�]� y 1p 1{��[{{{ 1�N
M�•�11J a. ��iTh�l(�J-.� �'J `N Y���:.T 11 Atil�JIll
�in�AM"14
,'hlef' 1•1/1,1,#a` A' I I-If ' 'NI'itOO' 'E•' '1 i ',1*.° 1) "�i'i. , ;'" ANO At7"T.1IU H,",
ii� �'i;r, � 't '1'1114:''fuf 3.t"1;1.,1I..1"At.,E 1ONi1'
•
• j
Ir.
''�,.. r.... ... ,., ....:�.�.., ....:.. ..... ... .:... ..�.. -, a, ., I .. I,o_rHr- •u n,rmr r ,r wb
� , ', , 4 u I• �—..w ...r w,,..w Irronn.,vw+wsn rAfny,J , ' q
,F ._.,... I . _ -1 .tea .. -. N..,,d✓. .14... ..A A,4. .t, LL.l a..,_ 1.Y. I.L..
r -.,.... '. ,.. ....w . .. .w ..Al.....4 R„a4,..:.1'FIbU:ITn, , '•.
L
MINUTES
TIGARri DESIGN REVIEW •
October 4, 1977 ,
limited to one foot above the top of the building, not
to exceed 20 :f:eet;
Cook amended the Tnnotion"1 and GoldbEtch seconded that the '
approval was 'for th ., 6 x 6 foot Swift Mart s1rgn with ,
aprovisiQn made Tor two tenants .
The motion was approved by 17cYimCU, voice
vote,
a Chairman McMonagle clarified the motion for LIie ,a
pJ.i�cant
• 5 .
Adjourmet
There being no, other lbbus"i,,neF,s, the ranee .'rin.g was adjourned at 6 :45
0
. i •
- i
I I
1 , ,
•I
•
I ,
• I � n
t ,:: «:;. -...,.. .., _ ..,,. ,._,L ;. ,,.,,.•..... ...,>z,,..,..;..,„a i> .,. ..a.,..,.:.;;a.. ,. .i r•.,.::;, i.._,sLi n .I..,..c,,.w.,.. ..w.,,,iz.,
MINUTES
TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW
October 4 1977 5: 30 P .m.
Tigard CityHal].
- • 12420 S.W .. Main Street - Tigard, Oregon
f
1. Call to Order:
`; The meeting was called to' order at 5 : 30 pm... bJ Chairman McMona,--
gee .
4 ..
2. Roll, Call•
Present: Cook, McMonagle, Olson , Cold'bach and Hammes
,e•a •• .I
Staff : E d'�iY a.4 d h� G. )
3, Communications:
None
pHearings:
SDR 9-77 (Burdick Forbes Building)
.
Review' of a freestanding sign
• A. Staff Presentation
•
Read by Edwards
Staff
G.
Salso stated that Vern Christenson NPO II, had
reviewed the sign and agreed with the staff x ecommen-
dation, ,y
•
D. Applicant ' s Presentation :
Arlie M
acvh-c r t- Luminite.. "1 Company ,
1`
o Presented the Proposed sign
o Stated the need for extra height and c1i a rced with
• n ' , the staff recommendation because of grade differences
op the site . ('
C. Board Discussion '
i• - 19999
1 {
o Board viewed Picturesdiscussed ecl
'. . various alternatives with siaf,� and applicant ,
Cook moved and God dbacb seconded for approval of the
sign with the condition that the sign h ; ,l �t her I
i, I C9
ff
•
N A. rl i.+._:u.:.t»I4.—.,.«..1.., r-.,•+4-.1.t4,
r i 1
1 a
}'TMGAIR ti9
Cl tl1 A16A jy6CITY OF TIGARD ,•,'5
4 i
P o�c ry.O.
� 23397
12420 S.111/. Main 1
Tigard,Oregon 97223 c,�. '1,9
' October1977 "F
7
Arlie in
rl Mav�h �er
Luminite Sign Company
g p y
P.O. Box 23636
Tigard, Ore. 97223 ,,;
Re : SDR` 9-77 ‘,
Dear Mr. Mawhirter:
. ry Please be, advised that the Tigard Design Revew Board at their meet-
ing of October 4, 1977 a d the the yg sign
pprove ,proposed freestanding
for the Burdick Forbes building at S.W. Greenburg Road and Shady,
° 1..1
Lane . This approval is subject to the following condition:
0 . That the sign height be. limited to no more than one foot
above building height, not to exceed 20 feet .
If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate *o won-
tact ire at this office
Sincerely,
•
Nancy tdwards
C
o,mmunity Design Planner
NE/jh
Enclosure j
•
Note: The following acknowledgment must be received by the City
of
Tigard within fourteen (14) days ,of your receipt o P this letter,
is te to
return this a
c nowls
gmint may result in action�o
n by the
City of Tigard.
.•
.. r
hereby � letter documenting the action• of the Tigard
ereby acknowledge t1a.
' �een lfoReview
theWdeBoard.
ca.sion here� "ceved and read tha;s letter, and I
a
� ag `�` documented and to abide by any terms and/
or ,conditions attached;
.4if (.1, __a:L.,2,/ ,
gnatureDate
i i .DJ a te
. Please be advisedthat conditions subject c_.
t to staff approval roval nast be
sati.sfied prior to issuance ofbuildig permts
^ I
,
i
1 n;
d
e
,., i
I• ' .l..f, .r4. _, „_ l..c..11'f-.lt/.» «rAaw t. .•,.l.,lF ,4a....l,Mw.l. m.,,V.aL,.4 w
...Ja-,+u.4.....Y.-i,.. 41 k:...Irrv.. .!{,. ..l.Lu.',.,L.0.x .,f-iv ...lµN,lol;/JV>4+4aYAn.l.+.{t%,iA+,eSWrvJl15.. 4L t.«n t..;•pyx
ItfF%w
v Lu'minite Sign Co.
Sales,Servvice and Rentals
P+O. BOX 23636
TIGARD,OREGON 97223
PHONE 639-4991
e •'
l.J
e tember 21, 1977
, ". . Planning Commission
. 1,;'" City of Tigard
RE: SDR 9-77 Burdick--Forbes Building i.
,
Swift Mart and Tenant Free-standing signs
ATTN: Nancy Edwards 1 ,'
Dear Ms,, Edwards
' • This is to notify you that we are appealing thedecision of
•
,e/ the D',,
, • Planning partment •restricting ng -the height of the sign
0' displaytoto seventeen feet.fe et.
i
The grade at building is Wt -5 ' below the road level and this
•b makes the sign too low to ifbe practical.° Also, the building
owners can. sign
;,� 2l'--2 5 r so' that °theobottomthe
� signwill be theu�sabl.e above the
road.
If this not agreeable,
• permit
isSwift Mart �.
, for a '
� p � with
to apply
wishes
p mit for a 6 x8 sign with the top of the sign at 28f ti
^ design, Please notify us as to review date if it is mere^ssa�y»
Sincerely,
rye
1,,;,,) ,,,,,t ..,„,.., ,,,,
. ....,- ,
, ,a,...,
%, ,,,,,,,, ifr/1 eyx,a_r ..,' ...,1t....-..$
(r
Arlie Mawhi;rter Luminite Sign Company
Representing Burdick' & Forbes 8 Swift Mart, Inc
'„ AM/chl
f
w
1 I :
n
I I
1 Z r •
:-•
I 1
I
I(1,
,
• .,.... '..:5 — .. I. v.1 .r ".. ✓n-.H.1;. ...) ,.. F.,.. ...I::: .. .. ,r. .... aA..... .4.....r. ,nl. ..A..F1 ...+da::r.l?..1."-.. .1+.. k.A.t'ik
Luminite Sign Co. -
Sales,Service and f?enlals
I
•
F.0,'BOX 23636
TIGARD,OREGON 97223
PHONE
639-4991
`
September 19 , 1977
Planning Commission
City
of Tigard
- RE: SDR 9-77 Burdick-Forbes Building
Swift
,.
Mart rt and Tenant Free-standing signs
ATTN: Nancy
Edwards
rd
s
Dear Ms. Edwards
1
. ., � your letter
In replay to 'of 9.--12-77 , we find that it is much \
more restrictiveexisting
than the city sign codes.
After consulting with Swift Mart, we submit the following
revised sign proposal:
The signs are at a total height of 21' (5 ' above building)
to top. This allows each tenant equal sign area of 6 'x8 '
double-faced. sign With. '8 ' clearance to ' rade. "
p .;
' Note enclosed sketch for Swift Mart sign is reduced from. 6 'x3 '
to 6 'x6 ' total area., eliminating the logo bird„ Tilley are 1
A fir. ^
conceding to this and the reduced height but are not happy
about it Y
, r
There is a possibility that the other tenant would concede to a
further reduction in height. This will be determined at a later
date when they sign their lease agreement.
Y
We hope this proposal will be satisfactory to you and early
1 approval_ of.the sign permit is issued to allow completion of
work prior tol the store opening.
.,A
,.n ° Thank you, 4,;
:
L
.r, Arlie Mawhirt er,
I ?
g c � �l
Manager ,y
AM�ch
cc:
•
swift Mart
v. IIS
•,rr i
11I,
J
• I
( I4 I ' , 1 `
'l
• I, r.
Y I
rh
L"k miAi < ,4Mb ,
30 .g• rAvenue
" 1YM v it
w fi
t 4.`w a �`" w r n.
s,q a k,
•4.W . a
C�, u
STI a •' ..�` 1pd+-+�• w9, that 04
° P � 1077
0*R a 7 r ,cbq e z y � )y
)
,
9i + n%a7 dsia mNiww of h i1st udi g ;41i6n / A hWMong Road and i
awh,,,a � 'r +,�t,+� u 40 r� v �! IfIb" oo" t�° ` e, ���'� cort:,.iti tiY,
. Y1 rw.a . af;Ki t;IF,a5 N.'. f 1,, r.-✓a, ,� .f. `"4»w t7 r.,':+k� :,y�i f,G,ra y, .,w M .. eu +;'h
.p
s'; pry o r i{xL�,� f ua��,p(� .rL{,y4Y d�.ul}+f�;� N4�,° �` 1 ry{ ry{ b n �J p `wM.}�r °l� a{, one ()��j� o�• 1' b v the«M�J#x•W� ��M"M"�' '..,0.v Ym�'''k��MY Srv��6�M1Y�^".w�-f��d;{!�r�, '1� M�r.' .q.M C��M 1W�i� f���K�wW R:M 4�A'�L�Wn 4 T++r�+9',••.`I W+ �A''.R �i�NNI"��Y�.�M' M!��Tv�i^x
1 that the
total
A. �'. W`� 1, Y not
.'�hl`f�l b�Y't` ��
building f ei ht that y th, to etuAr,�� �fpc. t qo K. 1,;, ra �o axypy .gykw
r t5a 1'M 1 tl f1,17 4�M^ + :q aN A h� i..5 4'+rM W�r'u I+, w�.Va�•�h R.*A:.Y.d .•:� 4"� •A G.+eA�,a,'}:.:� tor rP 1+.11',. iP'�'.+!*o.P 01';1101.* F
. : must..x�b included in 4s �i'« ,,,JAS '4.a�IMri 7i. te.J'� AY�dA'm'.W?!'�"i✓'6 , _ i
Ig
" use �Yy .h t �'�1 further
� «:.i,. dr p„i.,y q „'�Y .. f. , ..,�"9 r,'"v; t e. �a ,,.„I V,:C.Q•«�1re'r",11x '`AW Lo
'ria dw#�" t+1,1
°
YF`r vl a c w �,+r.w' '� _Su y � c ,
.
';',41(3,!:7. 0
a
�..JItWF4.W",1„,40
' ., b .r y 0 '.* wh ':rf '�'�.NA .fir,4,
P
4lak o w dP Yet„R#NQAe n+IM w4W't; ,: ,rh �Y� i o 4Me i M 'Il,i6 kMF NN iiuf0. " 'City
v
r a k x urt . n ( 4) daysayo of your r o i t of this lot- -
tor. Failure return to re u. this ++ owiodr, :m ;q YY t may u t z'.1; :-
• tion by the +crit, of T;. Y ' Y
hereby aekowe . q this letter documenting the action of the Tis4ard
Ya auiug Director. I have received 4Ad feta, this letter, and It ak'Axecl
to tF e pp e e soAhere documented aA d to
ab4/',r by ally teuo and/or eo -
t itioo'w,1
at'tY. w�; N
xdvUY+.+FYlarifaMlFaN4MMM�W.�aYw'Yi+YMWr!.1WYYMw+NMa4„v.+YM.•ulidcd.iaY4.YYM0111.144M4lM1Ih.+F:W4V/n}wW�huMW1iMM'.NMNIquYW..tlMM•.npNPYWwM:r.M.kWi'MY++Y'm
PlOase be El, tIltart ubje+at to 5"$r• ar 'flet
• outiOXiod prior to tO issuandeof building potm . * I
w .:1
ti
rFd�” l• y. r 1' . a ♦ .. .•,.."w...n...«Sa,.yar.yq�'a^'.1T4y
v
04 it 6 t I IG
11.
• .. „ ...,;, -.:,.Mme_.u..>. 1 w,...+a.. ,4,., ri'-
STAFF REPORT FINAL ACTION
TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW f
September 7, 1977 I'
Tigard
City Hall
� .
12420 S.W. Main Street - Tigard, Oregon
Docket : SDR 9-77 (Durdick-Forbes Building) '
Request Preliminary design review of a, freestanding sign
Location : Greenburg Road and 'Shady Lane
. Applicant :
cant Lumz
nite Sign Companyan
Y•
,
•
I Basic, Facts :
1. The site is zoned C-4 (Neighborhood Commercial) and desig-
'
nated "Commercial Retail" on Neighborhood Plan. IC .
1977 the request for a convenience market and
2 . On April i2, � .
office complex was approved by the Design Review board with
the following pertinent condition : (,
"A signing p returnedg
• ' �r Program be established and . to Design '
Review. " i .
3. Pertinent items from Neighlaorhood. Plan II are as follows : i ,
H
o "Concern was expressed by the NPO that commercial develop-
I. msnt is often a major identifying feature in a community,
offering impressions to resident and visitor alike of the
quality of life available. The Plan, therefore, urges
that shopping areas be pleasant environments to do bu.si-
ness within and not designed in a manner only to attract
attention. _ ,,
•
o Policy 18. As existing businesses are renovated and new
constructed the Design Review Board will en-
ones are con ` •
courage high design standards. Compa L,ibilit,y of land- '
scaping, architecture, and signing will be sought ,
• i ,
II . Staff Observations :
•
• The applicant is proposing to construct; 96 square foot y 7 x 8 ,
sign o C undetermined height . Thesign will consist of the com-
pany j ogo with the copy reading "Swift Mart 8 AM 12 PM. "
The sign is red and green, internally illuminated plexiglass.
DaneGreenburg The site is highly visible fromshady � , Road, and 1
a the exist ramp off 217 1
6.1
" � ? 1• ..,..,,t . .. ..,r .. ,.. «,,., i � .....mv.<.fiat;, `,.,,., .. ,y.. k. „„ , 'i ., _ ,e.-•,,..,.. S
I/Y
._.... �1 a lr. +..1..4+1...—rl .., :aaS4'...d...Wlk::.' -...a••l'... .Hn. .�1..,1r.aeF.,.{.X.fi�:n.4...71. ,.1«llY I.h4
.,w�m �u•. .» .+r...«. x.a ,... ..M........,.. .t,.+- «. .:r.nM.a,..,.�. a ...V.«,...1.+.. nt l.'1�:.`4d
STAFFREPORT - FINAL ACTION
" TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW
September 7, 1977
Page 2
The NP II designates tills area as a neighborhood shopping area
to serve the area residents.
'
'•, Therefore, t q comply withPolicy 18 the sign gn should be in scale
with the building and be compatible with the neighborhood shop -
,�•
ping concept .
p
III , Staff Recommendation :
'
Staff recommends approval with. the „following condition :
ing sign be no more than one foo above
1. That the freestanding
" the building height and that the total ;:quare feet not ex-
ceed 140 square feet. Adequate signing space for the two
other, tenants must be included in the square footage.
I
' r
ard Bolen
Planning Director
•
db
r. p
I ,
I ,
1
°"� �'r •'. ':9 1 rN�Ir ...._.� ...:�. ♦ te' .[ sua ..,., °A.r..,,irr..dv. _.�. -;tI.G.A i,A r 1
•
/1//e,A"y„
A ,.•. ,� HRADAMS ON TRU TI()NI SERVICES INC
•
TO,...sity of 6 14.1977
rr I'i
12420 S.W. Main St. PROJECT /
Burdick Forbes
. '` 4, T 1.q'ard, OR 3722:,
SUB JJECT
Property Easement - •
• ATTN: Nancy Edwards
.r
Tr
a s
miffedherewith:ewifh, These are: �
I;, s
❑ letter 0 ap :- noted ' ,
shop,drawing ;_"j' not app, oved
0 material list 0 submittal
0 pertinent infthrmation. resubmittal
u mittal
see below
I 0 for your record
•
0 action req'd
We received .:copies
g
Transmittin 1 {I.
_copies
;
i r
Please return copies by
REMARKS:
Enc .o,sec is the Property Easement allowing access to the
• rear of subject x erty Othercross easements are done
nd partially signed and w�.�loll� w.
I ,
J'OB
• I
Co
NSTR t. .TroN S ERVIC ES INC.
11844 S. W. PACIFIC
.p�
I ,1
HWY, TIGAkDi,OIREGON 97223 503/620,,,3744
• � ........ .. ............. . ... , .... R )f.a n •,.....r� .n ..n � _...,..� r,r ar .r..r.rr ., ir,. v
°
EASEMENT AGREEMENT
•
Dated: jt4 vl 10 , 1977
j
One Dollar ($1.00) other valuable�
In consideration of- and n
consider,, --011, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, •
DONALD A. FORBES, CAROLYN FORBES, DONALD C. BURDICKand LINDA A.
BURDICK, (hereinafter, referred to as Grantor) , conveys to CONRAD
E. ANDERSON, IRENE S. ANDERSON, PACIFIC NORTHWEST DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION, AN OREGON CORPORATION, G. V. MILLER, C. G. POTTER, •
J•. E. BOATWRIGHT and ROBERT M. SCHAEFFER, (hereinafter called
Grantee) , a perpetual nonexclusive easement for road and utility
purposes over, under, and across the property of Grantor described '
on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference incorporated'
herein.
h
•
This easement is granted subject to all prior easements,
encumbrances or conditions and restrictions of record. • •
A description of Grantee's property to which this easement
is appurtenant is described on Exhibit "B' attached hereto and by
this reference incorporated herein.
Grantees hereby agree to hold and save Grantors harmless
from any and all claims arisingfrom Grantee's use of said easement.
•
1 This agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the
• heirs, successors and assigns of the parties hereto, ,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this instrument
the day and year first Written above.
\ ' ; l /
.
.. �
lona ' '
Cara :yn o be
.ire Nr r�
Donald Bur•Lc}c Linda A. Burdick
STATE OF OREGON )
County of � �,� y 1,, ,�:; w,..; ; ss
, 1977
Personally appeared the above named Donald Forbes, '
Carolyn Forbes, Donald A. ,Burdick and Linda A. Burdick and acknow-
ledged the foregoing instrument to their voluntar „,,,ct and deed.
Before me: •
_;sito
r1
c w' is or oreg6,•n
Hy comm'ssio 2 ekp ire:
r kA
N
•
•
nrL.44444 +�wM.Y.w..,-.44.v.44 r+:VI'4.
EXHIBIT ,'A"
1. ,
i a
A non-exclusive easement for road and utility purposes over, under,
and across the following described portion of the northwest quarter
of Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, of the Willamette '
Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, more Particularly described as
r follows:
Beginning at the Southeast corner of that tract conveyed to Cary H.
Cotton and wife by Deed Book 361, Page 583, which point bears.South .,
88'° 10' West 643.8 feet and South 0° 20' East 466.5 feet, from the
4 Southeast corner of Lot 5, ASHBROOK FARM; thence South 88° 10' West
100 feet to the Southwest corner of said Cotton tract; thence North
r 0° 20' West on the West line of said Cotton tract 200 feet; thence
'South 88° 10' West on the South line of ani easement described in . •
Deed Book 433, Page 472, a distance of 100 feet to the West line of
that traci. conveyed
Lo Conrad E. Anderson and •wife, by Deed Book
• 254, Page 793; thence South 0° 20.' East along the West line of the
Anderson tract a distance of 4.00 feet to a point which is 34.00 r
feet south of the centerline of a connecting road known as South-
west Shady Lane, which point is also 16.00 feet north of the north-
east corner of that certain tract described in contract to Donald A.
Forbes, et al, recorded in Book 1067, Page 109, Deed Records, and
the true point of beginning of the parcel to be described; from said
true point of beginninn ruening West parallel to the centerline of
southwest° Shady Lane a distance of 15.00 feet; thence South 0° 20'
'• East, parallel to and: 15.00 feet distant westerly from the westerly,
S ntract, a distance of 127 feet,
Line of the aforementioned tothesoutwesterlylineof the Burdick tract; thence
r `
•
more or less,South 73° 17' 00'' East along the southwesterly line of the Burdick %
tract a distance of 15,50 feet, more or less, to the southeast corner
of the Burdick tract, which point is also on the westerly line of the
Anderson tract;. °thence North 0 20' West along the westerly line of
' the Anderson tract a distance of 131.25 feet to the true point of
beginning.
R
•
•
II
P ,
E)thib.it "A' - Easement
AgreOment
•
EXHIBIT 0B.
V PARCEL I.
A tract of land on the Northwest one-quarter of Section
35', Township 1 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian,
Washington County, Oregon, described as follows:
Beginning at the Southwest corner of the D. L. Graham Do-
nation Land Claim No. 52, Township 1 South, Range 1 West of
the Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon and running
thence East along the South line of said`,Donation Land Claim
1007.9 feet to an iron pipe; thence North 0° 28' East' 843.9 feet
to an iron Pipe on the East line of that tract of land
p p certain
conveyed to Andrew Wormsborg by deed recorded on Page 9 of
Volume 201 of Washington County, Oregon, Deed Records, which
point iP the true place of beginning of the herein described
tract. thence South 85° 58' West 396.67 feet to a 1 inch iron
shaft as reset at station 30+56.2 P.O.S.T. of Washington
County Road Plat No. 2043. (SW. Greenburg Road) .survey of
April 1967; thence along a curve to the right, with a radius
• of 686.2 feet and a long chord which bears North' 38" 16'45"
East 48.81 feet to a 3/4 inch iron pipe; thence along the
East right-of-way of said C.R. 2043 North 40v 15' East 225.82
' feet to a 3/4 inch iron pipe; thence South 74° 24' East 228.29
• feet to a 1-inch channel iron; thence South 00° 16' West •
121.39 feet to a 1-'inch ir.;.yri pipe, the true point of beginning.
•
PARCEL II.
Part of Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West of the ,
Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, described as �,
follows:
• Beginning at the Southeast corner of that tract conveyed
to Cary H. Cotton and wife by Deed Book 361, Page 583, which
point bears South 88" 10' West 643.8 feet and South 0° 201 dg
East 466.5 feet from the Southeast corner of 'Lot 5, Ashbrook
Farm; thence South 88° 10' West 100 feet to. the Southwest corner
of said Cotton tract; thence North Ou 20' West on the West line
of said Cotton tract 200 feet; thence South 88° 10' West on the
South line of an easement, described in Deed Book 433, Page 472,
a distance of 100 feet to the West line of that tract conveyed
to Conrad E. Anderson and Wife hY Deed Book 2' 54 Page 793;
thence South 0° 20' East on the West line of said Anderson tract
and on the West line of that tract conveyed to Conrad .Anderson
by Deed Book 258, Page 279 to the Southwest corner thereof; thence
Northeasterly on the Southeasterly line of said Wast mentioned I ,
Anderson tract to a point Which bears South 0° 20' East from
thence North 0'' 20' Westparallel With
beginning; `
Lhe place of be isaid Andersons to, the place of beginning.
the West line of said tract
EXCEPTING the following described property:
Seginning at the intersection of the West line of that
certain tract of land conveyed to Conrad E. Anderson, described
in Deed recorciec'i in Deed Book 254, Page 793, with the South line '
of that certain easement described in deed recorded in Deed Book
433, Page 472; thence south 0° 20' Bast on the West line of said a
Anderson tact 80.00 feet; thence North 88" 10' East 100.00 feet; ,
thence North 0°' 20' West 80.00 feet thence South 88" 10' West 1
on Lhe South line of said easement 100.00 feet to the'point of •
beg i.: mi ng.
Page 1 - Exhibit "B° Easemen+. Agreement
.
'4)
•'v
•
PARCEL III:
Part of Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willam-
ette Meridian, Washingtou County,,0regon, described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the West line of that
certain tract of land conveyed to Conrad E. Anderson, described b•
in Deed recorded in Deed Book 254, Page 793, with the South line
of that certain easement described in deed recorded in Deed Book
433, Page 472; thence South 00 20' Easton the West line of said
Anderson tract 80.00 feet; thence North 886 10' East 100.00 feet;,
thence North 00 20' West 80.00 feet; thence South 886 10° West - "
on the South line of said easement 10000 feet to the point of
beginning
•
•
•
•
I •
I 4;
9
Pr Pae 2 E�thSbxt t BY
Dasemerit Agreementent
v Y'M• .,++I..,ll. ,.P.� .3 ..w - ^.w •V.�' iF_...d..i.tY.: u.-0i'Ps:,•E
fpl jp o
tiiVED
lylAy 81917
CI PI'b 1 4iD
�,' o • 5eI, ��yy pp W� CONST !
' 'O Lit o Ti` and DATENla17 1'17 •
'
y
1. ;.
PROJECT S e W.Greenberg Rd.
SUBJECT Design Review
ATTN: Nancy Edwards
Transmitted he
e
wi'L-
These are,
❑ letter approved d
❑ Fpove as noted
shop drawing
pP
g nota �Dyed
❑ material list [J submittal
❑ pertinent information rr esubmitta].
0 see below for your x•eoo±d
Li action re 'd
u
�.
We received
c opie s
• Transmitting copies
Please return.n ,
copies b
Y
.
rri
• REMARKS:
•
• I ;
� I ,
JOB;;
FILM CONSTRuC TroN' ES y INC
•
C�C P i
11844 w
■awl•
.. �• .�yr./j��W Yen j�
� 503/620 ..4744
ql
•
,1 g !r CI. y, 4'71
kitiP F
CITYTIGARD. ,,W,.
INdMhDM TIN 7••,
v '
P. 0. Box 23657 I ,.
12420 S. W. Main
Tigard, Oregon 97223
April 22, 1977
Burdick/Forbes
H.R, Adams Construction Services, Inc. '
11844 S .W. Pacific Highway
Tigard, Oregon re on 9' 223
, Dear Sir:
. Please be advised that the Tigard Design Review Board at their regu-
lar meeting of April 12, 1977 approved your site development plan and
architectural design of a convenience' market and office building at
g
S.W. Greenburg Road and S .W. ShadyLane . This approval is subject to
the following conditions:
1. Cross easements for the joint driveway be recorded Prior to 1
issuance of the building permit
2. The existing trees be incorporated into the landscape plan
p
wherever possible f ,
3. Evergreen trees be added to the rear landscape area
4 . A maple tree be added to the landscape iS. aY .A
by the service "
drive
5. An
irrigation Plan and
revised .andsc
ape planbe submitted
prior to issuance of the building permit
6 . A signing program be established and returned to Design Re-
v1ew
7•1 Refuse container be screened on all sidess `
b ect to
� staff •
approval)
• If we can 'be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact
me at this office,
Sincerely
f
Nancy Vdwarci.s I ,
Assistant Planner 1
a
NE r11 n'
�
a ,
t , • . Y 1 G/ ' � . «...._...r.».«u.ws. !Sy 1 tlr 14
i,,A
rdick For u es b
.
April 22, 1977
, Page, 2
a. I
Note The following acknowledgement must be received by the City of
! Tigard within fourteen (14) days of your receipt of this let- f
' ." ter. Failure to return this acknowledgement ma3,,,..resu1t in ac--
.
tion by the City of Tigard.
a
m,, 1 hereby acknowledge this letter documenting the action of the Tigard
% . ° ', Design. Review 13oard. '�: have received and read this letter, and I
agree to the `decision here documented and to abide by any terms and/
' or conditions tached.
\-,,,. "c„ ,ei,„1 ,,i'"' ,/ i,''' ) P z'f ,
•
,,,t'''4'
2?
, --,,,P ,/.7 - ,
sig ature Da e
Please be advised that conditional subject to staff approval must be ..
satisfied prior to issuance of building permits,
•
, A I
1
P 1•
,
I �
•
•
� If
, s I , . ., , , ::
•
•
,'
•
may...... _ .::: a...>..
a
V ..mow.
•h �� 1'
I.
s
e.._.,_.
.,,"ter..•....•.,.._...,_,.r.,,,,.,.„,,,;.„er.,..,,,ec.,.
•
I I
I .
a
,
.
•.
•
•
• .I
w
.
•
I
^.' ....., y An r •1 N ....' ........4.,...., p P•a wrn..m+ yA ;l.� lu • ,
w
.''4 4 0
11
AP
Z' "a4)
.•�.� ) 15.E - -
r ,
Burdick/korbes
H.R. Adams Constructor Services11844 S.W. Pacifict Highwaya
• ; Oregon 9732
f rear Sir:
.ease be advised that the Tigard Design rtev .ew Board at their raga- •
:tar n eet:Leg of April 120 1977
architectural design of a convenience market and o4Pfioe building at
, S.W. Greenbur ,' Road and S.W. Shady Lane This aPProv a 1 is subject to
• the following conditions:
1. Cross easements for the joint driveway be recorded prior to
issuance of the building permit
•
2 The existing trees be incorporated into the landscape
• - wherever possible
4
3. Elvergreen trees be added to the rear landscape area
4. A maple tree be added to the lands ape island by the service
drive
1
• 5. Au irrigation plan and revised lu, asca e plan be submitted
prior to issuance of ,the buildingperm
t 4
6. A signing program be ,,eetablisbed and returned to -
view
7.1 Refuse
container
gcteened on all sides (subject to staff
approval),
f we can be of further assist0,21000 please do not hesitate to contact a
me at this office.
•
•
ince ,"
y.a
Nancy Bdward8
Assistant Planner
„ ,, ..,,,..., _. ...., .. ,.._ ,,,u,. ..«,.. ,..,i,l,1.. « ,.,. r ,..... ,.., .. Ya.w,w.. ,, ...,. ,., .,,._.Llai, .,.4'4 .,.W,. „•..., d:.:,
d •
•
BUrdiOk/FOrbeS
April 22, 1977 !.
Paw2
Note:, The following acknowledgement must be received the City of
Tigard, wI
igarithi fourteen (i 4) days of your receipt o this let-
. . Failure to return this acknowledgement x y result inate- k '
ton by the City of Tigard z
hereby acknowledge this letter documenting the action of the Tigard
Design Review Board. l have received and read this le
agree to the decision here documented and to abide by any terms and/
or conditions attached.
rnMt+,«M+�..w.aerriJA' . •'. , ..y '' wrwww.Wiw°wwi+N1
w.WSMT.MM11Mr•bMwMMc yyQ�{-.+rev -
Please be advised that conditional subject to staff approval must he
satisfied prior to iaauan6e of building Permits.
•
•
•
•
II
as
• Wo-
N•
. ( n •
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA 5 .4
TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
April 12, 1977 5 : 30 P.M.
Tigard City Hall
12420 S .W. Main Street
Tigard, Oregon
• DOCHET: SDR 9-77 (Burdick/Forbes)
. . r
REQUEST: For site plan and architectural review of a convenience
market and office complex
•
LOCATION: Greenburg Road and Shady Lane
APPLICANT: Construction _Services, Inc.
1 . BASIC FACTS :
ACTS .
•
_ a
1. The . t zoned C� - ►r
rie site is 4 (Neighborhood Commercial) and desig-
Neighborhood Planning II
natPd "Commerciald
., on Nei •hborhoo
Retail!'
2 . Neighborhood Planning II, Policy 18 states: "As existing
businesses are renovated and new ones are constructed the
Design Review Board will encourage high design standards.
Compatability of landscaping, architecture, and signing
will be sought . "
3. A. zone chan e for this site was approved in Ju` ' 97
g a Pp July e 1 6
with the following conditions :
a The Greenburg Road driveway be eliminated onthe site
plan.
b . Provision be made on thesite plan for continuing ac- .
cess to the adjacent southerly lots;
c, The Shady Lane driveway be shared by this development
and the
adjacent ent property with cross easements be re-
corded;
d A Deed Covenant be executed prohibiting vehicular ac--
TM cess onto Greenburg Road or Shady Lane at any other
location than provided in accordance with Condition No,
v,
e A one-half street improvement on Greenburg Road and;
Shady Lane be constructed to City code. The street it-
provement to include curb, storm sewer, and 5 ft » side � '
walk adjacent the property line;
l
STAFF REPORT T'
AGENDA 5 .4
e,
. TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ,
April 12, 1977 - 5: 30 P.M.
Page 2 {
That a zero lotsetback be
f. line permitted on the south
Property) as this A-2 property must be rezoned commer--
cial in order to conform to the comprehensive plan.
This will also, facilitate integration of future commer--
cial development . ,
•
' I I . FINDINGS:
1. The site slopes to the south and isred.ominantl covered,
P y'
several of small
with
varietiestrees >and one large willow
and maple.
2. No copy of any cross easement for use 0.1, the Shady Lane
driveway has been received, as per Planning Commission. Corr C` '
dition #3. This should, be accomplished prior to issuance .
of the building Permit .
3. The one-half street improvement on Greenburg Road is speci-
f ied as 22 ' 0" from center line. In order to comply with
',� h
county and city plans for. S .W. Greenburg, paving should ex- �' -.,'..
tend to 32 ' from center line as recommended by the Wa sh
• ington County public, Works Department
4. A 5 wideThis
:lt . u id., sidewalk is specified for the site. ,
width is adequate for Shady Lane; however, S .W. Greenburg
Road would require an 8 ft . sidewalk with a rolled curb in
at least one location. This sidewalk should be placed
adjacent to the curb if possible.
a 5. As per Planning Commission Condition #5, the required
'
street includes installation of a storm sewer.
Ihassfwershobld be continued to the south property line
on S.W. Greenburg. f
0 . The landscape plan proposes saving 'a walnut and apple tree "'
on the southwest corner. Since the southwest corner is out
of the construction area,' as many of the existing trees as
possible should be worked into the landscape plan .
7. The landscape area in the rear of the blinding specifies H,
shrubs and. ground�' cover= Evergreen or deciduous trees
should be added as a backdrop for the building.
I ,{
l ,
r.,
♦p
.
. �. .wN .p....NN»n..ara+eArrylk:rut uvt ' „ .
.
+v •
n. I
N 1 r
r
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA 5.4 A'
TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD .
April 12, /977 5: 30 P m.
Page,
3. A landscape p island is shown 'by the `service .drive. This is-
;
land 'should` include a tree planting in order to provide
• adequate impact for the site.
9. Plant material on the plan is predominantly deciduous . Ev-
ergreens should be added 'for yearround effect .
10. No method of irrigation has been specified.
No details for the
11. refuse container have been submitted. )" h
12 . No sign details have been submitted. A signing program for y
I the site .should be developed and returned to Design Review.
III . STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends approval with the following conditions:
1. Cross easements for the joint driveway be recorded prior to
issuance of thebuilding permit
• 2 . S .W. Greenburg be improved to city standards with h paving 82 ,
ft . from center line and an 8 ft . sidewalk adjacent to the
curb .
3,
The existing trees be incorporated into the landscape plan
wherever possible.
4. Evergreen trees be added to the rear landscape area.
5 A maple tree be added to the landscape island by the serv-
ice drives dn,
G . Irrigation plan and revised landscape plan be submitted
prior to the building permit
7 A signing Program be
established and returned to Design Re-
view.
8 , Refuse container be sax eenLd onall sides (subject tp staff
approval
• 'I
• � I
.r I , . ' , 1 p....,.......»,.r.,.,warca.«ns.unxx'sxtyI • ' I
l m,
. ...,.::. :..,..,,..,.,..;:,.+ .;.,H i, «,,is<. r.a,...,i.1.., 4.,..,:.::n.... „„1"': _......;:..i ..s,.,u.n:o ,.,:.r . ,,.0--.;w„ h.n...la.+;euM+., ..M.,:., ,Hd.,..,tt..:;..k. :;a.w,,...I..r .M,a,,, 1:' ;..,1, .c,.....::7, +,:«..•t..r.;,,r..,.r...4+.».
MINUTES
•
TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
April 12, 1977 5: 30 P M
Tigard City Hall
12420 S .W . Main Street - Tigard, ;Oregon
CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL. Present : Hammes, Olson, McMonagle, Cook
Excused Absence : Goldbach
Staff: Edwards and Daniels, .,..
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES : The minutes of February 8, 1977 and March
pp
22 1977 were approved as read.
4. COMMUNICATIONS : None
5 . DESIGN REVIEW:
5 .1 SDR 46-76 (Dickinsen) •
A request for 'architectural review of color samples for a
previously approved building
' A. Otto Van Walstyn, engineer, specified a wood cedar facia ,
with a dark stain and raked concrete and anodized trim.
(A color chart was submitted. )
• .q
Olson moved and Hammes seconded to approve the color
samples as specified.
The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote .
5 ,2 SDR 10-77 (Lamb Weston)
A request by Hoffman Engineering for site plan and architec-
tural rev.iew of a proposed 7, 500 sq. ft . addition to an ex-
'sting building at 6600 S „W. Hampton
• I . Site Review •
A:
ry
Staf�: Report :
Read by Daniels
B. Staff Recommendation :
Staff recommends approval with the following condi
tions :
1. A non-remonstrance agreement be filed with the
city recorder for the improvement of S .W. Hampton •
Street .
m
•
•
•
MINUTES r
;
. r
TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ,,
April 12, 1977 - 5: 30 P.M.
• • Page 2
2, S .W. 68th Avenue be improved and a street tree
program be initiated (matching the standards ap
proved for the Farmers Planned Development) ,
This improvement should be in. conjunction With
the development of the Farmers Planned Develop-
ment .
3.
A.
n irrigation i
r anon �lan be received.g
C. Applicant ' s
r � Presentation.w
Tom Whittaker, architect, presented pictures of the
site and explained
the Project . ,
D. Board Discussion:
o Discussion on S.W.' Hampton 'Streetrd a
S .W. 68th .
Cook moved and Olsonseconded econded for approval of
the
a site
plan 'With the staff recommendations .
The motion was approved byunanimous nimous voice vote.
{
II . Architectur< f. Rev
o Tom W'aittaker, architect descrdbed specifications,
as per architectural plan, with colors to match the
existing building.
Olson moved and Hammes seconded to' approve pp e the architec-
turalplan as submitted.
e mo
tion was approved
b� u
unanimous voice
vote.. ,
,� r
5, 3 SDi 8-77 (Canterbury Square)
t by Kolve and Kettlebergfor site
A request
Y plan and archi-
tectu.ralreview of a proposed 1, 700 sq, ft . addition at !
14363 S .W. Pacific Highway.
I . site Review:
' A, Staff Report :
o Road bar Daniels
• P
. n
....,.,.. -.:. ..:.:... ._» .,;.,.,. ,..,.»,.,,.. ,. ..„::,.... ..a,., i. u....K.,,.=•.,.:u.:,a+P.,........:..,-,.,. ..,.«,.,.. ..w.. r..,_ ,:u .lam . mr.�—Y,::i..,,--.a.u.. ..aaa,.-..r 4....+.,. ',r-.-,...u,...a'I.i.,,.a., 6ad...r„w....a,,:t uq .....,.sau.x '
•
MINUTES
TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
April 12, 1977 -- 5: 30 P.M. .
Page 3
o Staff presented a memo with regard to past
Plan-
nang Commission actions regarding Canterbury
Square:
•
B. Staff Recommendations:
Staff recommends approval with the following condi-
. tions
• A 1. That a lighting system be installed in the Pedes-
trian walkway .
edes-trianwalkway .
2. That a landscape plan and irrigation plan imple�
mentatin Finding #5 be submitted (subject to
C
g
staff approval)
3. That a landscape plan for Canterbury Square (in- (,
corporatng all Planning Commission conditions)
be submitted prior to occupancy of the new addi-
tion.
C. IA icant s Presentation .
ppb
o Jerry Kolve, applicant, presented the plan and
discussed the staff conditions .
• o Don Kettleburg, applicant, protested Staff Recom-
mendations #2 and 3.•
D, Commission Discussion :
1
o McMonagle suggested, that an island be placed on
the end of the parking row, rather than a long
center 'strip
Hammes moved and Cook seconded for approval with the "
following conditions :
•
.. That the planter be installed in the last two
parking stalls . .
2, That a lighting system be installed in the pedes.=
I Y '
tra.an ' walkway
3. That
aconcrete Walk be installed from the pay-
ing in front to the paved area inback
i •
• . I
.,,t., .... « ,.4..4...a>n k.,.t U,.,...r Na 4.wA`.fy. ..n l..,. .u.. G•. .- . .NJ ..t. ,
,.aw.,.Ma..Ja,-:+..,x..cc i.Y...-, n.M..a..'- ..t1V., w,,.u..,z..w.1•;;2.»..,i,i t»+,..7:1-.,. r 1
It
• MINUTES
TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
April 12, 1977 -- 5: 30 :P.M.
Page '
w ,
4. That the sidewalk area in front of the new store 'in--
corporate a landscape 'bed and possible street furni
r 9
ture (subject to staff review)
Cook moved and Olson seconded to amend the motion to
state: No building Permit be issued until staff re-
searches the conditional use permit landscaping require
ments and for the applicant to submit evidence that all
conditions of the Conditional Use Permit were satisfied.
Cook moved and Olson seconded '
for a second amendment: that
a detailed landscape plan for the entire site be submit-
ted, to the Design Review Board prior to issuance of oc- .
cupancy Permit.
o McMonagle asked that staff investigate past condi-
tional use before the next meeting.
Vote on motion with 2 amendments ; - -
The motion failed in a 1 to 3 voice vote, with Cook, Ol-
son,
and NlcMona Je dissenting.
Vote on motion with first amendment :
The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote,
lie Architectural Review:
o Tom 'Vadnais, architects stated that the building would
be brick, matching the existing building, with a shake
roof canopy
pl architecture
Olson moved and Cook seconded to approve the � "
as !presented
The motion! was approved by unanimous voice vote.
5.4 SDR 9-77 (Burdick/Forbes
A request by Construction Services, Inc. for site plan and
architectural review of a
'
convenience market and office corn
plexat Oreenburg goad and Shady
Lane.
• I Site Review' r
A. Staff Report :
• ,,y. .. ....><..,.a,,......,•.,.w. .so-,-,M.n.r.,.,. r w ,. ._ I ,
w a n
w ,
. .. .rxu .+...l_..»,. _a.. .Gi.. ,a„ �..w1,.._.il..w..S ..,..,_;.'...,.,.1.Iw ......M..•t.,Ld.uT:,,l, .,_,.u.:xc; '
MINUTES
TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
April 12, 1977 5: 30 P.M.
Page 5
o Read by Daniels
B. Staff Recommendation:
on:
Staff recommends, approval with the following condi-
p •
tions
1. Cross easements for the j0int driveway be re- ;'
• corded prior to issuance of the building Permit
.
' 2, S .W. Greenburgbe 'im .roved to Cit standards
'; � P Y
with Paving 32 ft . from center line and an 8 ft .
•
sidewalk adjacent to the curb '
3. The existing trees be incorpo,lrated into the land--
ti
scape plan wherever possible y”
4. Evergreen trees be added to the rear jandscape
area
5. A maple tree be added
o the landscape island by
the service drive
r ,
"t 6. Irrigation P
devis.e landscapeb
o
submittePrior tothe building permit
* ' 7. A signing programbe established and returnee. to
Design Review
S . Refuse container be screened on all sides (sub-
ject to staff approval)
C. Applicant 's Presentation:
Harley Adams , Construction Services, explained the
project and discussed the staff conditions.
De Commission Disussion :
, ohalf-streetDiscussion on improvement and systems A.
development charge
Cook moved and Hammes seconded d fadapproval With
tafi recommendations,�i :
0 McMonagle stated he would vote because he believed
Item #2 should be clarified. by the City Council
r � ^ � M •,,; y,,, ., r A.., ^_I , .,'`: ...,..,„«J.,p....,+.�.,. n,yw,�7R nxy A . . .. .. � ;L ,. ,.. ., ,.,n., '�
w lb'1rTrY �' ♦ y b .,.
I r
•
r , MINUTES
TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
•
April 12, 1977 - 5 : 30 P.M.
Page 6
The motion failed in a tie vote, with Olson and Mc-
Monagle
.,
dissenting.
. I
Olson and Cook moved for approval with staff recom-
• mendations
and that Staff Condition #2 be remanded
back to City Council .
i.• ..
The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote.
II . Architectural lReview...
o Harley Adams stated that minor changes would be made
ro-�be would
'• �o the 'aa.cl7itec�ture plus a bicycle rack p
vided Color samples were submitted •
Cook moved and Hammes seconded for approval as submitted.
The motion was approved by unanimous
voice vote .
5 . 5 SDR 11-77 (Snyder Roofing)
A request by McKenzie Engineering for site plan and archi-
tectural review of a proposed storage tank and an architec-
tural addition to a previously ` approved structure at 12560
S .W . Hall .
a ,
I . Site Review
A , Staff Report :
o head by Daniels ,
II
B . St,;ff Recommendation: r °
Staff recommends approval with the following condi-
,
tions:
corner,.
1. ' Shore pine be extended aroundlthe eastern
of the fence
• :
W
2 The planting bed be widened to a minimum of 8' ft . '
. I
'
r s Presentation
° C. Applicant 's
McKenzie Engineering, agreed d t,� staff
i
o conditions and. Dave Wel,cho r,specified a buff color for the
tank.
I 1
. . .. ..... 1 ._. .. r..i ,. .i ,,.. I.,.. r... •.. r...r.i \. ...,..r . ,...,, .i ,n. .r r.. H.rr v,., v r .. 1.
tx 1
t + • I
tl u
«... f., .b.,..f.r.�.I�.�..,+�,.mrvn niti,«rJ..t,n4 •..
•
.,.;.;
MI lV U 1c1�J IJ :
TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD "'
April 12, 1977 - 5 : 30 P.M. ,h
Page `'7
•
D. Board Discussion : I•
Hammes moved and Olson seconded for approval with •••#1n the staff conditions
II. ,Architectural Review:
• M1
o Dave Welch described the canopy and` submitted color
samples .
Hammes moved and Cook seconded to approve the ` canopy as
presented.
•
4
The motion was approved by unanimous voice vote. y: .
6. OTHER BUSINESS:
g other the meeting a d
• • ' •' . .in no •
There be business, m � was adjourned at 8: 30.
•
a ,
I I „
, I
J ,
•
•
•
C11.11( 0
• � I
•
•
.pates Arnc�Urat f
•
Name ' " ) Cash
Addi.ess/' hecle
Bldg.
I .�P,op�,o, � :J CUs,Lk. f ,
Plbg. - ❑ Pubctns, ❑ Bike Lk,
E Sew.S
�Ictl,
Cot)ies
' er
v;l. -
{ ^
Sewer _
�lir�g Fine&F, Cj
•
Assrtrt, E Zanin
- purer � g
: .
Permit
•
CITY O
•
VJHI'TCHEFL F'FlINTiNG 9:4T11Tio
F_r •
•
•
•
. I
a I
•
•
A11 I
�. 5 • ,' ,I
•
•
. Y
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW
M I
Site Plan Review
Architectural Review .�.�.. �.�.
Fee Received t ,,
APPLICATION Receipt # y _.
Date Received
Tia �---
ra ,� ls.nn,.rn, Cc�rnm.a_,s�icn
12420 SW Main St. , Tigard, Or, 97223 B
• 639-4171
fro
• -� Ti Ll . ` ..?� a -�e 1�ilea.
Pro ject Address ' ....
Tax Map No. `� 'c ' ' Tax Lot NonM c 'e.?_.
Owner/Developer _. � ... '- '".�..�` T' /AS,
' , Address ›u . , 4 ° c Tele h.one 747/
•
.[�'Owners I,/ d/
Telephone �p
..�.
•
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Pre oIsed Use #
•
' 1eitt.4 Aft4Ricat- goma 0Tst) ...., �'
Site Sizey Tot Sq. Ft. of Bulld,i_n rs ^y/(��'JhJ�
���. - M+..F.FhgR:r.nlr-..wM.:rrYr�w. i.
S . Ft. of Paving Sq. Ft. of Landscaping _____212.0
Anticipated Developtnerrb Date liVA,V-D
Ani icipa•bed Development Phases (:)t4e.....
,nM, Va:l.1 a-b i o 11 t..y��....� �� -� � °•- °''
M� ... DO NOT WRITt BELOW THIS LINE
Special Conn.diti..ons Dedications
sa
Eondi.n.g a
,I� � Ir•n.i,.. - \ 1 i..Y.wr.....+r4MiW..r.rJ.iww.wrL�kr._ ,,,
Other
FinalFinal �nspInspection by Date
:
:r.
' •
•
•
•
•
{
r
i 7
f,,
r �
/
•
•
}
1
I
r
A4 M
,ti
, , 1 , , .
J
.D' , 1 ,
', r9
•
n
•
•
, fss .
•
I1 I I
�nrA+rk++C41w;'
y ' 9 l
ga
,t,/
"
R
e
+ ,u; ( .�. M«,a 111.. a _n...,a.a.+.;.a,.,...i,-. 7b:•:.�.;.t:.Y.cG+...a, r '
•
•
OAYE INV,NO.OR REMARKS GROSS DISCOUNT NET
e 4"'.� - a
TOTAL - I
•
' r
THIS IS A STA`l'EMF'NT OF PAYMENT OR
A STATEMENT OF EARN
BEFORE CASHING
NGS AND TIONS
1 ,
•
THOMAS G V i'd, .1S
AIF CH-1( CTECT'
SKYLINE '
2041 S, W. SEBTH AVENUE
PORTLANID. ORE. 97221
4 F'HONEc 292.0713 t
•
•
- WNMxkJMr+.w+vYl++s Aka+M•WYwlruYlkMua,auKiMlr'bhR�k.. 1
\ , ,Ai:Wk,VIii
it
e•
u,
rR
A ',��arc� r � •
rrF
SERVICES INC. k
HARLEY R. ADAMS
11444 s.'N PACIFIC H',NY,
• TIGARh'h OREGON 51,7223
tix 5b3✓620.97.44
•
•
4
STAFF REPORT FINAL ACTION
TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW
September 7 , 1977
`kkimo Tigard City Hall
12420 S.W. Main Street - Tigard, Oregon
Docket : SDR 9-77 (Burdick-Forbes Building)
Request : Preliminary design review of a freestanding sign
Location : Greenburg Road and Shady Lane
Applicant : Luminite Sign Company
I . Basic Facts :
1. The site is zoned C-4 (Neighborhood Commercial ) and desig-
nated "Commercial Retail" on Neighborhood Plan II .
2 . On April 12, 1977 the request for a convenience market and
office complex was approved by the Design Review Board with
the following pertinent condition :
"A signing program be established and returned to Design
Review. "
" 3. Pertinent items from Neighborhood Plan II are as follows :
o "Concern was expressed by the NPO that commercial develop-
ment is often a major identifying feature in a community,
offering impressions to resident and visitor alike of the
quality of life available. The Plan , therefore, urges
that shopping areas be pleasant environments to do busi-
ness within and not designed in a manner only to attract
attention . . . "
o Policy 18. As existing businesses are renovated and new
ones are constructed, the Design Review Board will en-
courage high design standards. Compatibility of land-
scaping, architecture, and signing will be sought .
II . Staff Observations :
The applicant is proposing to construct 96 square foot , 7 ' x 8 ' ,
sign of undetermined height . The sign will consist of the com-
pany logo with the copy reading "Swift Mart 8 AM -12 PM. "
The sign is red and green , internally illuminated plexiglass .
The site is highly visible from Shady Lane , Greenburg Road, and
the exist ramp off 217 .
STAFF REPORT —FINAL ACTION
TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW
September 7, 1977
Page 2
The NP II designates this area as a neighborhood shopping area
to serve the area residents .
Therefore , to comply with. Policy 18 the sign should be in scale
with the building and be compatible with the neighborhood shop-
ping concept .
III . Staff Recommendation :
Staff recommends approval with the following condition :
1. That the freestanding sign be no more than one foot above
the building height and that the total square feet not ex-
ceed 140 square feet . Adequate signing space for the two
other tenants must be included in the square footage .
Z;0( ' ?77,
ichard Bolen
Planning Director
o