Loading...
MMD2017-00022 MMD2O17 - 00022 STARBUCKS NOTICE OF TYPE I DECISION MINOR MODIFICATION MMD2017-00022 11111 STARBUCKS TIGARD 120 DAYS = October 25, 2017 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: Starbucks CASE NO.: Minor Modification(MMD) MMD2017-00022 PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing a minor modification to an existing development at 11701 SW Pacific Highway, in order to accommodate a new fast-food eating and drinking establishment, Starbucks. Specifically, the applicant proposes to: install new signage (including an order point canopy with digital order screens, menu boards,and directional signs);replace sections of asphalt and pavement in order to comply with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards; add landscaping; and convert an existing enclosed patio to an outdoor seating area. Furthermore, the property will maintain an existing drive-in facility,but the applicant proposes to relocate the drive-in window in order to increase the length of the on-site vehicle stacking lane. APPLICANT: GPD Group Attn: Rafia Darwish 400 North 34th Street, Suite 2016 Seattle,WA 98103 OWNER: Pacific Crossroads Properties,Inc. By Wyse Investment Services Company Attn: Greg Close 801 SE Belmont Street Portland,OR 97214 LOCATION: 11701 SW Pacific Highway WCTM 1S136CD,Tax Lot 100 ZONING DESIGNATION: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. Except where nonconforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations,are permitted conditionally. MMD2017-00022 Starbucks 1 APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360.060.0 SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request, subject to a conditional of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. CONDITION OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS: The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING, ATTN: KHOI LE (503)718-2440 or khoi@tigard-or.gov. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 1. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall demonstrate compliance with water quality requirements, in accordance with Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site Information: The project is located at 11701 SW Pacific Highway; north of SW Pacific Highway, south of SW Pfaffle Street,west of SW 78t''Avenue, and east of Highway 217. The subject tenant space is 3,042-square-foot commercial building that was previously occupied by a fast-food eating and drinking establishment (Arby's) with a drive-in facility. The building is located on a 3.07-acre tax lot that includes one (1) additional commercial building, 159 parking spaces, and associated landscaping. The site is zoned General Commercial (C-G). SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS MINOR MODIFICATION OF SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW: Section 18.360.060.0 states that a Minor Modification shall be approved, approved with conditions or denied following the Director's review and as follows: 1. The proposed development is in compliance with all applicable requirements of this title; and FINDING: The applicant is proposing a minor modification to an existing development at 11701 SW Pacific Highway, in order to accommodate a new fast-food eating and drinking establishment, Starbucks. Specifically, the applicant proposes to: a. Install new signage, including an order point canopy with digital order screens, menu boards, MMD2017-00022 Starbucks 2 and directional signs. Elevations and detail drawings for the proposed signs were not submitted or required with this application.Accordingly,compliance with the applicable standards in'1DC Chapter 18.780 Signs will be confirmed during the sign permit submittal process. b. Replace sections of asphalt and pavement in order to comply with ADA standards. Staff reviewed the applicant's submitted site plan to confirm the proposed changes are in accordance with the applicable standards in 1DC Chapter 18.705 Access, Egress and Circulation and Chapter 18.765 Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements. c. Add landscaping adjacent to the north and west sides of the existing building. In April 2015, the City of Tigard Planning Division approved the subject site for modifications to on-site parking and landscaping in order to accommodate a new right turn lane on SW 78th Avenue. In this decision (Case No. MMD2015-00012), staff determined the site met the 15% minimum landscape requirement for the C-G zone (TDC Table 18.520.2). As the applicant proposes to install additional landscaping to the site, staff finds the total on-site landscaping will exceed this minimum requirement. d. Convert an existing enclosed patio to an outdoor seating area,which will result in a reduction to the footprint of the existing building by 467 square feet. Staff reviewed the applicant's site plan to confirm the proposal meets the dimensional requirements for the C-G zone, including minimum setback requirements. e. Maintain the existing drive-in facility, but relocate the drive-in window in order to increase the length of the on-site vehicle stacking lane. Staff reviewed the applicant's submitted site plan to confirm the proposed change complies with the minimum stacking lane requirement for drive- in restaurants (200 feet), as outlined in 'fDC Table 18.765.1. Additionally, the City of Tigard Engineering Division was sent a copy of the applicant's materials,and had no objections. Upon review of the applicant's plans and narrative, staff finds that all other applicable requirements are met.This criterion is met. 2. The modification is not a major modification. FINDING: The applicant submitted a trip generation assessment to illustrate how the proposed new tenant (Starbucks) will not create an increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site that exceeds 100 vehicles per day (1'DC 18.360.050.B.7). The subject space is a 3,042-square-foot commercial building that was previously occupied by a fast-food eating and drinking establishment (Arby's) with a drive-in facility. The assessment, prepared by Kittelson & Associates, concluded that the proposed Starbucks will result in fewer daily vehicle trips to and from the subject site, compared to the former Arby's. This conclusion is based on trip generation estimates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, and the fact the applicant proposes to decrease the subject building's footprint by 467 square feet. Accordingly, staff finds that the changes listed in 1'DC 18.360.050.B.1-11 are either satisfied or do not apply. Therefore, the proposed development is not a major modification. This criterion is met. CONCLUSION: The proposal is a Minor Modification of existing site development and is in compliance with the applicable requirements of this Title. MMD2017-00022 Starbucks 3 SECTION V. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X _Affected government agencies Final Decision: A Minor Modification is a Type I procedure. As such, the Director's decision is final on the date it is mailed or otherwise provided to the applicant,whichever occurs first. The Director's decision may not be appealed locally and is the final decision of the City. THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JUNE 27, 2017 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JUNE 28, 2017 Questions: If you have any questions,please contact Lina Smith at (503) 718-2438 or LinaCS@tigard-or.gov. L. • -- June 27,2017 APPROVED BY: Lina Smith Assistant Planner MMD2017-00022 Starbucks 4 l J O O N r T I GARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: June 20,2017 TO: Khoi Le, Principal Engineer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Lina Smith,Assistant Planner Phone: (503) 718-2438 Fax: (503) 718-2748 Email: LinaCS at tigard-or.gov MMD2017-00022 - STARB U CKS - REQUEST:Tenant improvement for new Starbucks in former Arby's location. Property will maintain existing drive-thru, but applicant will relocate drive-thru window to increase length of stacking lane. Other proposed modifications: replace asphalt and pavement for ADA improvements; convert enclosed patio to outdoor seating area; add landscaping; and construct new signage. LOCATION: 11701 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 1S136CD, Tax Lot 100. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District.APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapter 18.360. Attached are the Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY:JUNE 26, 2017. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter or email. Written comments provided below: Name&Number of Person Commenting: Lina Smith From: Khoi Le Sent: Tuesday,June 27, 2017 7:33 AM To: Lina Smith Subject: RE: Starbucks at former Arby's location Hi Lina, No comments except the one below. Prior to issuance of Building Permits,the Applicant shall demonstrate to meeting the water quality requirements in accordance with the CleanWater Service Design and Construction Standards. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Khoi From: Lina Smith Sent:Tuesday,June 20,2017 12:29 PM To: Khoi Le<khoi@tigard-or.gov> Subject: RE:Starbucks at former Arby's location Hi Khoi, attached is the Request for Comments form as a Word document, in case you need it. Thank you, Lina From: Lina Smith Sent:Tuesday,June 20, 2017 11:17 AM To: Khoi Le Subject: Starbucks at former Arby's location Hi Khoi, Does Engineering need to review this Type I Minor Modification for the Starbucks in the former Arby's location (11701 SW Pacific Hwy)? I believe Engineering has already reviewed the attached trip generation memo. Otherwise, their modifications to the site are very minor. Please let me know, thanks! Lina Lina Smith Assistant Planner City of Tigard Community Development 13125 SW Hall Blvd.Tigard,OR 97223 E-mail:LinaCS(a,tigard-or.gov DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules"City General Records Retention Schedule." 1 Agnes Kowacz From: Khoi Le Sent: Monday, May 1, 2017 6:49 AM To: Agnes Kowacz Subject: FW: FW: Tigard coffee shop - pre-app materials From: Kevin Chewuk [mailto:kmc@dksassociates.com] Sent: Friday,April 28, 2017 3:28 PM To: Kim McMillan<KIM@tigard-or.gov> Cc: Khoi Le<khoi@tigard-or.gov> Subject: Re: FW: Tigard coffee shop- pre-app materials Hi Kim, I've reviewed the Tigard Coffee Shop Trip Generation Assessment Memo and don't have any comments. The pass-by trip reduction is typical with these types of uses given that most of the trips are already on the system. In this case, the coffee shop will attract fewer people who aren't already driving by than the fast-food use. Let me know if you have any questions. Have a great weekend. Thanks, Kevin Kevin Chewuk, PTP Transportation Planner Ph: (503) 243-3500 I Email: kmc@dksassociates.com D KS 720 SW Washington St. Suite 500 Portland, Oregon 97205 vrww.dksassociates.com 19 CI This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged.Unless you are the addressee(or authorized to receive for the addressee),you may not use, copy,distribute or disclose to anyone this message or any information contained in or attached to this message.If you have received this message in error,please advise the sender and delete this message along with any attachments or links from your system. On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Kim McMillan<KIM@tigard-or.gov> wrote: Hi Kevin, Please review Diego's traffic memo. I don't usually see pass-by trips deducted from the trips calculations. Is this typical? He's hoping to avoid the Major Mod land use process. However, I just want the report to meet the standards. 1 The frontage improvements have already been completed by Walmart and Costco, so a Major Mod would just impact the planning side of things. Thank you, Kim From: Diego Arguea [mailto:darguea@kittelson.com] Sent: Monday, April 17, 2017 4:21 PM To: Monica Bilodeau<MonicaB@,tigard-or.gov> Cc: 'tconner@gpdgroup.com' <tconner a,gpdgroup.com>; Darwish, Rafia(rdarwish@gpdgroup.com) <rdarwish@gpdgroup.com>; Kim McMillan<KIM@tigard-or.gov> Subject: Tigard coffee shop -pre-app materials Good afternoon Monica, Please see attached draft trip generation assessment for your consideration/review regarding the proposed coffee-shop conversion of the existing fast food restaurant located at 78th/Hwy 99W in Tigard. I look forward to meeting you and discussing the project in person tomorrow. Thanks, Diego Diego Arguea,P.E. Senior Engineer Transportation Engineering/Planning 610 SW Alder St, Suite 700 Portland,Oregon 97205 503.228.5230 503.535.7462 (direct) 503.334.3183 (mobile) 2 Bir mss SISTA{NA III Y AT WORK GOLD CERTIFIED a. III LIAR DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e- mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules "City General Records Retention Schedule." 3 Agnes Kowacz From: Khoi Le Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 2:04 PM To: Agnes Kowacz Subject: PRE2017-00016 Starbucks Attachments: Khoi Le.vcf Agnes, Average Vehicle Trip for Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window (ITE 937) = 818.58 per 1000 square feet gross floor area Average Vehicle Trip for Fast Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window (ITE 934) = 496.12 per 1000 square feet gross floor area Difference = 127.54 At 3000 square feet, the difference is going to be 382.62 trips. Khoi Khoi Le City of Tigard Principal Engineer (503)718-2440 Work (503)412-9646 Mobile khoi@tigard-or.gov 13125 5W Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules "City General Records Retention Schedule." 1 V imi 'd tll r:,01 Pl J —'lI Me "1.11CF CRVED City of Tigard COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT `.UN 0 5 2.41 7 Minor ModificationType_JApplacation 'rRING PROPOSAL SUMMARY (Brief description) REQUIRED SUBMITTAL The proposal includes a conversion of the former Arby's space to a ELEMENTS Starbucks coffee shop with outdoor seating and drive-thru facilities. 2/Owner's Signature/Written Site work will be limited to new signage. drive-thru equipment. and limited Authorization pavement replacement for ADA compliance. The drive-thru window will be Title Transfer Instrument or Deed shifted east to lengthen the drive-thru stack. Site Plan(2 large plans drawn to scale and one reduced to 8.5"x11'/2") [/Applicant's Statement/Narrative Property address/location(s): 11701 SW Pacific Hwy. Tigard, (2 copies)Address criteria in: OR, 97223 TDC 18.360.050.B.1-1 Tax map and tax lot #(s): 1 S136CD00100 El Filing Fee D ((he pcLl mt?pi 1 e f e.thf/`�(j Site size: 3.07 ac. part of overall shopping center. Improvements will be limited to the proposed Starbucks. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Applicant*: Starbucksijt Case No.: Address: 2401 Utah Ave South, Suite 800, MS: SD-9 Related Case No.(s): City/state: Seattle, WA Zip: 98134-1435 Application Fee: Phone: 206-204-7450 Email: rdarwish@gpdgroup.com (Rafia Darwish of GPD Group for Starbucks) Application accepted: By: i\ Date: 5 I PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDERS) 1::] Same as Applicant Name: Wyse Investment,./ l,GcZJ ' v Application determined complete:f Address: 801 SE BelmorSt By: LS Date: City/state: Portland, OR Zip: 97214 I:\CURPLN\Masters\Land Use Applications Rev.11/24/2014 Contact name: Greg Close Phone number: (503)595-9685 When the owner and the applicant are different people,the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner.The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. APPLICANT'S STATEMENT The applicant's statement must include a summary of the proposed changes. Criteria in either -1'.364.050(I i or 8.330.020($)(L)must be addressed with a detailed response to each criterion. Failure to provide the information needed to process the application would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. In addition, the Director must find that the proposed change is in compliance with all applicable requirements of Title 18 of the Tigard Development Code.To complete this review, the Applicant's proposal must include a discussion indicating how the site expansion/change will continue to comply with the maximum setback,building height,parking,and landscaping standards. Other requirements of this title such as clear vision, solid waste storage,non-conforming situations,signs,and tree removal may also be applicable depending on the type and location of the proposed modifications. City of Tigard • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard,Oregon 97223 • www.tigard-or.gov • 503-718-2421 • Page 1 of 2 r . APPLICANTS To consider an application complete,you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTALELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements"box. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above ret guest does not violate anti deedestrictions that rnav_bc_attached to or imposed uppaihc subject property. • If the application is granted,the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan,attachments,and exhibits transmitted herewith,arc true;and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued,based on this application,may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application,including the policies and criteria,and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property required. Applicant's signature Print name Date ,, COSH .�• z Y- I Owner's signature Print name / Date Owner's signature Print name Date ADDITIONAL OWNER/DEED HOLDER INFORMATION Name: I I,'?G C46,54046 frciooti?C-3 Name: Address: 8/aSezedi''1/T#/OO Address: City/state: "#1 -rl1 O 9i - City/state: Zip: Signature: _ _Signature: MINOR MODIFICATION APPLICATION City of Tigard • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard,Oregon 97223 • wwwtigard-or.gov • 503-718-2421 • Page 2 of 2 X F,7 JUN 0 5 :_:`2.17 We certifypis instrument to be a true _l� r',�YrP.r_f�1/lecoTied zf 1ri'/cI- CIT"� O'�TIGARD Copy � � PLANNING/ENGINEERING Book_ f acje Fee9;(„+g. Records tiT a.2L�-. yz_Ccuniy, Oregon WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Mark Norby By if t.J;tn.:C,t_f-Q 611-,1,1 -<-e-* Stoel Rives LLP Suite 2300 (Space Reserved for Recorder's Use) 900 SW Fifth Avenue Portland, OR 97204 STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED TED L. MILLAR, AS TRUSTEE OF nit,TED L. MILLAR LIVING TRUST, Grantor, conveys and warrants to PACIFIC CROSSROADS PROPERTIES, INC., an Oregon Corporation, Grantee, the real property in Washington County, Oregon, described on attached Exhibit A, free of encumbrances except as specifically set forth herein. SUBJECT to the matters set forth on attached Exhibit B. The true consideration for this conveyance is $5,273,000. paid to an accommodator pursuant to an IRC Section 1031 exchange. THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. DATED this 17 day of April, 1 97. QA Ted L. Millar, as Trustee of the Ted L. Millar Laving Trust STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. County of Mul tinotnabt.l The foregoing was acknowledged before me on this 1? day of April , 1997 by Ted L. Millar, as Trustee of the Ted L. Millar Living Trust. SEAL Notary P hlic for the Stare of regon •[SEAL' , "+ My commission expires: Q 1 "n 1 Until a change is requested, all tax statements shall he sent to the following address: Pacific Crossroads Properties, Inc., c/o Wyse Investment Services Company, 806 SW Broadway. Suite 700, Portland, OR 97205. roQiIBI A Order Co: 164384 LYGAL DESCRZPTZCN PARCEL 1: A tract of land situated in the Southwest quarter of Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette meridian, City of Tigard. Washington County, Oregon. being described as follows: Beginning at the re-entrant corner on the West line of the George Richardson Donation Land Claim No. SS, in Section 36, Township 1 South. Range 1 West. Willamette Meridian: thence Northerly along the West line of said Richard Donation Land Claim No. 55 a distance of 392.78 feet to a point in the Southerly right of way line of County Road No. 975 (S.W. Pfaffle Street) ; thence South 89'48' East along said Southerly right of way line a distance of .463.88 feet to an iron pipe on the West line of the Florence Hammer tract as described in Book 117. Page 281, Washington County Deed Records, said point being the true point of beginning of the tract herein to be described; thence South 0'41' 11" East along the West line of said Hammer tract a distance of 280.81 feet (South 3°42' East, 281. 1E feet per Deed) c0 an iron pipe in the North '.ine of that tract of land described in Deed to Herter: V. Krause, recorded June 6, 1945 in Bock 244 , Page 515, Washington County Deed Records; thence continuing South 0°41' 11" East along the 'west line of said Hammer tract a distance of ^ 06 feet; thence North 99.18' 49" East 3 distance of 116.32 feet; thence South C'41'11" East a distance of 0.96 feet to an iron pipe marking the Northeast corner of said Krause tract; thence South 0°39' 21" East along the west line of that tract of land described in Deed to Charles F. Condon and wife by Deed recorded March 13, 1943 in Book 215. Page 637, Deed Records of Washington County, a distance of 119.78 feet (South. 119.45 feet per Deed) to a point in the Northerly right of way line of SW Pacific Highway 99-W: thence Horcneasterly along said Northerly right of way line the following courses and distances: 31.49 feet along the arc of a 11.389.16 foot radius curve to the Left through a central angle of 0.09' 30" (the chord of which bears North 57°38'33" East. 31.49 feeti ; thence South 32°26' 13" East a distance of 10.00 feet; thence 248 .69 feet along the arc of a 11. 399.16 foot radius curve to the left through a central angle of 1815'0C* (the chord of which hears Ncrtn 5056' 17' East. 218 .69 feet) : thence South 33'41113' East a distance of 10.00 feet; thence 28.95 feet along the arc of a 11, 409.16 foot radius curve to the left thrcugn a central angle of 0.11' 44" (the chord of which bears North 56812'55• East. 38.95 feet) to a point in the westerly right of way line of SW 78th Avenue as described in Fee :.o. 63 13459, Recorded April 22, 1983. Reccrds of Washington County: thence tracing said westerly right of way line the following courses and distances; Nortf, 34.02' 30" west a distance of 144.41 feet tc a point of curvature: thence 107.57 feet along the arc of a 180.00 foot radius curve to the right through a central angle of 34'14'10° the cnord of which bears north 16.55' 15• west. 105.98 feet to a point of tangent: thence North 0°:2'00' East a distance of 21 .62 feet to a point in the Southerly right of way line of SW Pfaffle Street (County Road No. a751 ; thence North 89°48' 00* Nest along said Scutnerly right of way line a distance of 287.76 feet cc the true point of beginning. ?ARCEy II: A tract of land situated in the Southwest quarter of Section 36, Township 1 South. Range 1 West, 'ail:ametco Meridian. City of Tigard. io the County of Washington and 'State of Oregon. Beginning at the re-entrant corner on the west line of the George Richardson Donation Land Claim No. 55, In Section 36, Township 1 South. range 1 West, will3mccte Meridian: tnence Northerly along the West line of said Richardson Donation Land Claim No. 55, a distance of 392.78 feet to a point in the Southerly r_ght of way line of County Road Exhibit A v rrn t ,ThF 1 Order No: 164384 LZGAL L£SCR:FTION No. 975 (SW Pfaftle Street, ; thence South 89'48' East along said Southerly right of way Line. a distance of 1463.88 feet to an iron pipe on the West line of the Florence Hammer Tract as described in Book 117, Page 281. Washington County Deed Records; thence South 0°41' 11' East along the West line of said Hammer Tract, a distance of 280.81 feet ;South. 0.42' East, 281.15 feet per Deed) to an iron pipe in the Norte line of that tract of land descr:ted ir. Deed to Herbert V. Krause. recorded June 6, 1945. in Book 244 . Page 515, 'Weeningcon County Deed Records; thence continuing South 0.41' 11• East along the West line of said Hammer Tract. a distance of 0.96 feet co the true point of beginning of the tract herein to be described; thence North 89°18'49° East. a distance of 116.32 feet; thence South 0°41' 11' East, a distance of 0.96 feet to an iron pipe marking the Northeast corner cf said Krause Tract: thence South 0'39'21" East along the West line of that tract of land described in Deed to Charles F. Condon and wife by Deed recorded March 13. 1943 in Book 215. Page 637, Deed Records of Washington County, a distance of 119.78 feet tSouch, 119.45 feet per Deed) to a point in the Northerly right of way line of SW Pacific Highway 99-w; thence Southwesterly tracing said Northerly right of way line, a distance of 225.23 feet along the arc of a 11.389.16 foot radius curve to the right through a central angle of 1'07'59° (the chard of which bears South 58°17' 17" west. 225.23 feet) to a point which is 70 feet distant Northwesterly from centerline station 46.08.3 of the relocated centerline of Pacific Highway west; thence leaving said Northerly right of way line and running North 2'56' 34° West along the West line of that tract of land that was conveyed to the State of Oregon in Eook 184. Page 541. Records of Washington County. a i.istance of 185.08 feet t+forth 1.42' West, 184 .5 feet per Deed) to an iron pipe at the iorrhwest corner of said State of Oregon Tract; thence South 89°39'55' East along the North Line of said State of Oregon Tract. a distance of 42.03 feet; thence leaving said North line and running Norte 58°12'32' East. a distance of 49.08 feet. to a point in the West line of said Hammer Tract; thence North 0°41' 11" West along said West line, a distance of 27 .30 feet to the true point of beginning. PARCEL A non-exclusive easement for ingress. egress, parking and utilities to the benefit of Parcels I and :I herein.. including the terms and provisions therein. as outlined in the Grant and Declaration of Easements. recorded October 20. 1985. in Fee No. 85043387, Records cf Washington County. PARC::. :V: A non-exclusive easement for ingress and egress over the new easement area and for utility purposes under the new easement area for the benefit of Parcels f and II herein as sec forth in Amendment to Agreement for Common Easement recorced August 23. 1994 as in Fee No. 34077512, Records of Washington County, Oregon, described as follows: A tract cf land in the Soutneast one-quarter cf the Southwest one-quarter of Section 36, Township Sout.n. Range 1 West cf the willamette Meridian, teing more particularly described as follows: 1~�St121�Lt A Page 2 of 3 Order No: 164384 /AGA:. OESCn222'Cu BEGINTING at a 5/8 inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap inscribed 'W. B. Wells' at the Suthwesc corner of that tract of land described as Parcel :i in Deed Document No. 90-3186 recorded at Washington County Deed Records: thence North 50.11' 30' East 201.00 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap inscribed 'W. S. Wells'; thence Soutn 13'20' 54' East 103.51 feet to a point. said point being the true point of beginning; thence North 59°25'48' East. 111.66 feet to a point, said point being South 2'134' 00• East 134 .83 feet from a 3/4 inch iron pipe: thence South 2614' 00' fast, 34 .39 test to a point; thence South 30°51'50" East. 14.00 feet to a point on the Northwesterly right of way boundary of S.W. Pacific Highway, said point narking the non-tangent beginning of an 11,389.16 foot radius curve to the right having a central angle of 0'11' 46', a chord bearing of South 59'14' 03' West. and a chord distance of 39.00 feet; thence along said curve to the right and along said right of way boundary, 39.00 feet to a point of non-tangency; thence North 30'40'04' West. 14.50 fet to a point: thence South 53°25'43• west, 65.86 feet to a point. said point being North 13'20' 54' west :5.08 feet from 5/8 inch iron rod with yellow plastic cap inscribed 'W. 8. :4ells. : thence North 13'20'54' West, 31.41 feet co the true posit of beginning. Eatubl.t.. A Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT B TITLE EXCEPTIONS 1 Regulations, including levies, liens. assessments. rights of way, and easements of Tualatin Valley water District . 2, The premises herein described are within and sub;ect to the statutory powers including the power of assessment of the Unified Sewerage Agency. 3' A dedication to the public of a perpetual right of way and easement for street, read and utility purposes, including the terms and provisions therein; Recorded: Cctober 15. 1984 Recorder's Fee No. : 84040597 4. Grant and Declaration of Easements for Access and Parking, including the terms and provisions thereof, Dated: October 29. 1985 Recorded: October 30, 1985 Recorder' s Fee No. : 85043387 �., Amendment to Agreement for Common Easement. including t!le terms and provisions thereof: Dated: August 19, 1994 Recorded: August 23, 1994 Recorder's Fee No. : 94077512 6 Unrecorded Lease, including the terms and provisions thereof, and such other exceptions as may appear necessary upon the recording thereof; Dated: April 23. 1984 Lesser: Ted L. Millar Living Trust Lessee: Plaid Pantries, Inc. , an Oregon corporation, d/b/a Plaid Pantry Store No. 149 Disclosed By: Subordination, Estoppel and Attornment Agreement Dated: September 21, 1995 Recorded: Cctober 30, 1995 Recorder' s Fee No. : 95078859 7. Unrecorded Lease, including the terms and provisions thereof, and such other exceptions as may appear necessary upon the recording thereof; Dated: September 4, 1984 and Amended October 11. 1989 and April 28, 1993 Lessor: Ted L. Millar Living Trust Lessee: Petco Animal Supplies. Inc. , successors :n interest to ,;.A. Machado S. Cc. . a California corporation Disclosed By: Subordination, Estoppel and Attcrnment Agreement Dated: September 22. 1995 Recorded: Dctocer 30, 199S Recorder' s Fee No. : 95079860 E. b 1 t B Page 1 of 4 8. Jnreccrded Lease, including the terms and provisions thereof, and such ocher exceptions as erev 3cpear necessary upon the recording thereof; Dated: September 10, 1984 Lessor: Ted L. Millar Living Trust Lessee: Baskin-Robbins USA Co. , formerly known as Baskin-Sctbrns, :nc. Disclosed By: Subordination, Estoppel and Attornment Agreement Dated: October 12. 1995 Recorded: October 30, 1995 Recorder' s Fee No. : 95078861 9' Unrecorded Lease. including the teres and provisions thereof, and such other exceptions as may appear necessary upon the recording thereof; Dated: October 5, 1984 Lessor: Ted L. Millar Living Trust Lessee: Tandy Corporation, a Delaware corporation Disclosed By: Subordination. Estoppel and Attornment Agreement Dated: October 5, 1995 Recorded: October 30, 1995 Recorder' s Fee No. : 95078862 10, unrecorded Lease, including the terms and provisions thereof, and such ocher exceptions as may appear necessary upon the recording thereof; Dated: November 1. 1984 Lessor: Ted L. Millar Living Trust Lessee: St. .;ohns Camera Center, :nc. , an Oregon corporation Disclosed By: Subordination, Estoppel and Attornment Agreement Dated: September 29, 1995 Recorded: October 30, 1995 Recorder's Fee No. : 95079863 11. Unrecorded Lease, :ee:uding the terms and provisions thereof. and such other exceptions as may appear necessary upon the recording thereof; Dated: February 11, 1985 Lesser: Ted L. Millar. as Trustee of the Ted L. Millar Living Trust Lessee: Fabricland. inc. , an Oregon corporation Disclosed By: Subordination. Estoppel and Attornment Agreement Dated: October 3, 1995 Recorded: October 30, 1995 Recorder's Fee No. : 95078864 22, Unrecorded Lease. including the terms and provisions thereof, and such ocher exceptions as may appear necessary upon the recording tncrecf; Dated: March 1985 Lessor: Ted L. Millar Living Trust Lessee' Prosser Piano, an Oregon corporation Disclosed By: Subordination, 1:stocpel and Attornment Aereement Dated: October 17, 1995 Recorded: October 30. 1995 Recorder' s Fee No. : 95078865 Exhibit f3 Page 2 of 4 13. Unrecorded Lease, including the terms and provisions thereof. and suor other exceptions as may appear necessary upon the recording thereof; Dated: Decencer 13. .988 Lessor: Ted L. Millar Living Trust Lessee: Mustafa Elcgoi, d/b/a Halal Meats Disclosed By: Subordination. Estoppel and Actornmenc Agreement Dated: October 23, 1995 Recorded: October 33, 1995 Recorder's Fee No. : 95078866 14, Unrecorded Lease, Including the tem and provisions thereof. and such other exceptions as may appear necessary upon the recording thereof ; Dated: February 13, 1989 Lessor: Ted L. Millar Living Trust Lessee: Graphic Information Systems, Inc. d/b/a LazerQiiCk Disclosed By: Subordination, Estoppel and Actornmenc Agreement Dated: September 27, 1995 Recorded: October 30. 1995 Recorder' s Fee No. : 95078867 15. Unrecorded Lease. including the terms and provisions thereof, and such other exceptions as may appear necessary upon the recording thereof, Dated: May 30, 1990 Lessor: Ted L. Millar Living Trust Lessee: Room For Dessert, Inc. Disclosed By: Subordination. SStcppe: and t.ttcrnmer.c Agreement Dated: September _8, 1995 Recorded: October 30, 1995 Recorder' s Fee No. : 95078868 16. Unrecorded Lease. ;eluding the terms and provisions thereof . and such ocher exceptions as may appear necessary upon the recording tnereci; Dated: September 11, 1990 Lessor: Ted L. Millar Living Trust Lessee: RTM Portland. Inc. Disclosed By: Subordination. Estoppel and Actornmenc Agreement Dated: September 28, 1995 Recorded: October 30. 1995 Recorder' s Fee No : 95078869 17. nrecorded Lease. including the terms and prov_:;icns thereof. and such other exceptions as may appear necessary upon the recording thereof; Dated: March 28. 1391 Lesser: Ted L. Mi.lar Living Trust Lessee: HRO, Inc. . d/b/a Ham Radio Outlet Disclosed By: Subordination. Estoppel and Actornmenc Agreement Dated: September 28. 1995 Recorded: October 30, 1995 Recorder' s Fee No. : 95078870 Exhibit B pate 2 of 4 • l5. Unrecorded Lease. including the terms and provisions thereof, and such ocher exceptions as may appear necessary upon the recording thereof; Dated; September 19, 1991 Lessor: Ted L. Millar Living Trust Lessee: Brent w. Hislop and Claudia His1cp d/b/a Superior Signs Disclosed By: Subordination. Estoppel and Attcrnment Agreenent Dated: October 24. 1995 Recorded: October 30, 1395 Recorder' Fee ::o. . 9507987/ Exhibit B Page 4 of 4 • SHEET NOTESI 1. NEW WAYFINDINGS GRAPHICS. 2. EXISTING PARKING STALLS. * -; CITY OF TIGARD 3. PROPOSED CLEARANCE BAR. Approved by Pla n ingg4. PROPOSED PRE-MENU BOARD. Date. (49/1 -1711- -- S 1 0'24'37"E 1 5. PROPOSED ORDER POINT CANOPY AND DIGITAL ORDER SCREEN. cC. 40.87' _� I�]IHS STMeUCKS COFFEE COMPANY Initials: 1-S . 6. PROPOSED 5-PANEL MENU BOARD. 7. PROPOSED P.C.C.CURB. STARBUCKS COFFEE © 522.13'35"E 8. PROPOSED FULL DEPTH ASPHALT REPLACEMENT. 2401 COMPAN AVENUE SOUTH • 23.75' 9. PROPOSED ADA PARKING STALL AND ASPHALT OVERLAY AS NECESSARY FOR ADA COMPLIANCE. SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98134 (206)318-1575 10. PROPOSED PAVEMENT 4"WIDE WHITE SOLID STRIPE. THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND SHALL REMAIN THE SOLE PROPERTY OF STARBUCKS CORPORATION, 11• PROPOSED LANDSCAPING. WHICH IS THE OWNER OF THE COPYRIGHT IN ',` THIS WORK.THEY SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED 12. EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE. (IN WHOLE OR IN PART),SHARED WITH THIRD THRU WINDOW. PARTIES OR USED IN ANY MANNER ON OTHER 13 PROPOSED RELOCATED DRIVE JECT WIOJECTS THOUT TOHE PRIOR SWRITTEIONS N CONSENTHIS T OF .,I� STARBUCKS CORPORATION.THESE DRAWINGS I DIRECTIONALSIGNAGE(THANK YOU/EXIT ONLY). AND -___---------------'___ DESIGN INTENT FORA 14 PROPOSED DR VE THRU Y. EXPRESS ,, d _=_ .. PROPOSED OUTDOOR SEATING AREA PROTOTYPICAL STARBUCKS STORE(WHICH IS �, 15. OU OO SUBJECT TO CHANGE AT ANYTIME)AND DO NOT © 'S-es', REFLECT ACTUAL SITE CONDITIONS.NEITHER ,A PARTY SHALL HAVE ANY OBLIGATION NOR ;I • / 9 16. PROPOSED BIKE RACK. LIABILITY TO THE OTHER(EXCEPT STATED " �C7�'':, c'S'C<\ ABOVE)UNTIL A WRITTEN AGREEMENT IS FULLY p V• EXECUTED BY BOTH PARTIES. 17. EXISTING TRANSFORMER. 'W ,� %". D�'';, q, I STARBUCKS TEMPLATE VERSION 0015.05.01 Q c� \y 18. PROPOSED REPLACEMENT OF P.C.C.CURBED WALK AS NECESSARY FOR ADA COMPLIANCE. �f 0 za.� —' /�'= F 19. PROPOSED DRIVE-THRU DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE. O O . 8.0' 8.0' 8 0 O 9 „.:„. 0 � ,, ,, „ in 0:::,. '11'9' 0 41 IVB in ci �N , IJ ���:, GPD Engineering and Architecture ,i 1 1 ” n ,d I I,'.;�I \ D I Professional bon i-,7 — ! I ..',- ,-. �' 2 - _ 520 SOUTH MAIN Corporation SUITE 2531 � I ,s ,s 1'•! I i'' LEGEND AKRON,OH 44311 I P:330.572.2100 F:330.572.2101 111 J ® KEYNOTE GPD PROJECT NO. 2016355.37 Oi; 'ti I EXISTING CURB �. 1�/ PROPOSED CURB 2/ Ii., • s Si.:. 1'03'00"0/ PR_ PROPERTY LINE L ` t ` • 14.13 EXISTING LIGHT POLE �S, 111Pz:, / „"I / n PROPOSED FULL DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT L — PROPOSED ASPHALT -___ _-- - PRP EDMILLAND OVERLAY - ,.:,;. --_I]i o 10111 .,- © I ® • // PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT — P/L �_– I--,` --- / :_.-- � R=1 1,409.16' I — t2 — - 4•-•114.... r. `/ PN 0/' _ ^ L=16.95' , .W+`•`y' PROPOSED LANDSCAPING A-00'05'06 ' CH=556'1 6'14"W, 16.95' 7--' / 00 } Q� ,,;- N33'41'13"W N- --...._0_7,i �'� 'y ='' 10.00' N °ZS = 77v 1 V ------i: /' /.' ice'G\F\C' g��'O = cii O ii :: w P 1\.„4„.."---• s. 0 20 � ❑ ,_ _ a p O ' �' \P'' 10 40 / /i. "•' P. 1=20' w Q LLI O Q 0 Qb /' // Horizontal Scale in Feet O O N.N. 0 "" =`. • ''�'- R=11,399.16' 0 LL ,--- Ct. /' �/ 7• f.�' L=248.70' STORE#: 3389 Qi'v ' ' ,,=� A=01"15'00" PROJECT#: 15375-032 CH=S56'56'17"W, 248.69' CASEWORK CONCEPT: „?�" ISSUE DATE: " / DESIGN MANAGER / ' ".,- ! QN/' /' `�1�� LEED®AP: /' V` PRODUCTION DESIGNER: /// / / \) /A`,P� CHECKED BY: / / C) 0` Revision Schedule �/ '' Q P"-\-0 y0' is:kRECvEr Rev Date By Description N32> 6'13''W .- \ da •0- 10-.60' '-.=- cam' `\IA° y �P�\P�\, JUN 0 5 Z O i y SHEET TITLE: / PROPOSED SITE PLAN ' ©(� CITY OF i l'A.r a PLANNING/ENClNEERINC' SCALE:AS SHOWN 1 l SHEET NUMBER: A-000 RECE1VPr Architects'Engineers'Planners GPD GROUP, JUN 0 5 www.gpdgroup.com Glans,Pyle,Schomer,Burns&Delaven,Inc. 20 1 I 1-800-955-4731 OITY LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL 'EANNINGIr N. INEERIN( Attention Community Development Date 05/31/17 Job No 2016355.37 To City of Tigard Re Starbucks 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 11701 SW Pacific Highway Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR WE ARE SENDING YOU M Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints M Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ Sepias ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 05.31.17 1 Minor Modification Application 1 05.31.17 2 Title Transfer Instrument/ Deed 3 05.31.17 3 Site Plan 1 05.31.17 4 Narrative 1 05.31.17 5 Kittleson Trip Generation Letter THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For compliance ❑ No Exception Noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution Exceptions Noted (do ❑ For your use ❑ not resubmit) ❑ Return corrected documents Revise & resubmit (see ❑ As requested ❑ Notes) ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US M For review and comment ❑ Rejected ❑ Not Required — Return ❑ without Action ❑ FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS: Please find the attached Minor Modification application for the proposed Starbucks project at 11701 SW Pacific Highway. With any questions, I can be reached at 206-204-7450 or by email at rdarwish@qpdgroup.com. Thank you, Rafia Darwish Copy to File Signed Rafia Darwish If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once. RE-, U: a 201/ Akron Office Ag 520 South Main Street tel 330.572.2100 '..r GPD G R�U P� C11 '; �} �G� � Suite 2531 fax 330.572.2101 'I.ANN1�``��.,,: •"Y'���ti- ' ' �`-'` Akron,OH 44311 www.gpdgroup.com Glaus,Pyle,Schomer,Burns&DeHaven,Inc. Community Development Department 30 May 2017 City of Tigard 2016355.37 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard,OR 97223 503-718-2421 Re: Proposed Starbucks—11701 SW Pacific Highway Minor Modification/Type I Narrative To Whom It May Concern: GPD Group is requesting review of a Minor Modification/Type I submittal on behalf of a proposed Starbucks project located at 11701 SW Pacific Highway. The site is situated at the northwest corner of SW Pacific Highway and 78th Avenue. The proposed Starbucks coffee shop will include a 2,575 SF building with an outdoor seating area and drive-thru services. The narrative below addresses each of the evaluation criteria included in TDC 18.360.050.B.1-11. 1. An increase in dwelling unit density, or lot coverage for residential development; Response:Commercial use,not applicable. 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units; Response:Commercial use,not applicable. 3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765; Response:The previous use of the building was an Arby's fast food restaurant,per discussions with Tigard Planning Department,the proposed Starbucks will be considered a fast food eating/drinking establishment,and therefore no additional on-site parking should be necessary. 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code; Response:The proposed commercial structure and construction type are A2 VB. 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20%; Response:There is no proposed change in building height. 6. A change in the type and location of access ways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected; Response:Based on the attached site plan, there is no proposed change in type and location of access ways and parking areas.Site work will be limited to like-for-like pavement and sidewalk replacement as necessary for ADA compliance;drive-thru equipment will be replaced and relocated for Starbucks'needs;and brand directional signage and pavement markings are proposed. 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day; Response:Per letter provided by Kittleson&Associates dated April 17,2017: "the proposed drive-through coffee-shop development is expected to generate fewer daily trips compared to the former drive-through fast-food restaurant use". A trip generation estimate was also provided. The letter is attached with the submittal for reference. 8. An increase in the floor area proposed for a nonresidential use by more than 10%excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet; Tigard, OR 2 of 2 30 May 2017 Response:There is no increase in floor area proposed. Due to the removal of the freezer/cooler used by Arby's,and the removal of the atrium area, there will be a net decrease in floor area. 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space which reduces the open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open space area by more than 10%; Response:Not applicable, no proposed change to common open space or usable open space. 10. A reduction of project amenities below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10%where specified in the site plan: a. Recreational facilities; Response:Not applicable,no proposed changes to recreational facilities,however,the proposal does include an outdoor seating area. b. Screening;and/or Response:Not applicable,no proposed changes to screening. c. Landscaping provisions. Response:Not applicable,landscaping is proposed at the rear of the building in the location of the existing freezer/cooler. There is no reduction in landscaping. 11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of site development review approval which are not the subject of paragraphs 1 through 10 of this subsection. Response: There are no proposed modifications to the conditions imposed at the time of site development review,relating to paragraphs 1-10 of the subsection. Current Owner: Wyse Investment/Pacific Crossroads Applicant on Behalf of Starbucks: Properties, Inc. Rafia Darwish, of Glaus, Pyle, Schomer, Burns& 810 SE Belmont DeHaven, Inc. Portland,OR 97214 dba.GPD Group 400 N. 34th Street,Suite 216 Proposed Lessee: Seattle,WA 98103 Starbucks Coffee Company 330-572-3532 2401 Utah Ave. South rdarwish@gpdgroup.com Seattle, WA 98134 Please contact me with any questions regarding this letter or the proposed Starbucks project at 206-204- 7450. Respectfully, ActAL/vt. ... Rafia Darwish, El, LEED AP BD+C Project Coordinator GPD Group RECEIVED KITTELSON 610 SW ALDER STREET,SUITE 700 & A J O IAT ..) PO 503 28.RTLAND5230,OR 97205 503.273.8169 JUN 05 2017 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING/ENGINEERING April 17, 2017 Project#: 21215 Kim McMillan City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Trip Generation Assessment-Drive-Through Coffee Shop Dear Kim, This letter documents the trip generation change associated with the proposed renovation of a fast food restaurant building with a drive-through, located on the northwest corner of the Highway 99W/SW 78th Avenue intersection in Tigard, Oregon. The existing fast food restaurant building is located within a shopping center development with full vehicle access from SW 78th Avenue and limited access (right-in/right-out) from Highway 99W. There are nine striped parking spaces along the building frontage, and a larger parking field is shared with the shopping center development. The applicant seeks to permit and renovate the existing fast food restaurant building as a drive-through coffee shop with indoor seating, which is expected to generate fewer system-wide daily trips than the fast-food restaurant land use. As a result, no trip vesting or off-site traffic analysis is anticipated to be required as a result of trip generation alone. Additional details of the proposed development and trip generation characteristics are provided herein. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The existing fast food restaurant building is approximately 3,042 gross square feet and will be maintained but renovated for the proposed coffee shop development. After renovations and the addition of an outdoor patio, the coffee shop gross building size will be approximately 2,575 square feet. The existing drive-through will also remain, and the development team is currently working to identify the most efficient use of the drive through while minimizing the impact to the parking field. TRIP GENERATION ASSESSMENT Trip generation estimates for the proposed development are based on trip rates from Trip Generation, 9th Edition (publishes by the Institute of Transportation Engineers). The trip generation is summarized in Table 1. As shown in Table 1, the proposed coffee shop is estimated to generate approximately 358 net new daily trips, 44 net new weekday AM peak hour trips, and 19 weekday PM peak hour trips. Compared to FILENAME:K:111 PORTLAND I PROJFILE121215- TIGARD STARBUCKSI REPORTI DRAFTI21215TRIPGEN APRIL 17.DOCX Trip Generation Assessment-Drive-Through Coffee Shop Project#:21215 April 17,2017 Page:2 an a fast food restaurant, the proposed coffee shop is estimated to generate 411 fewer daily trips, 26 fewer weekday AM trips, and 31 fewer weekday PM peak hour trips. Table 1 Trip Generation Estimate Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Trips Size Daily Land Use ITE (square feet) Trips Total In Out Total In Out 1111116111111111111111111 FYictinw Uc .' Fast-food Restaurant with Drive-Through 1,510 138 70 68 100 52 48 934 3,042 Less Pass-by Trips(49%) (740) (68) (35) (33) (50) (26) (24) Net Existing Trips 770 70 35 35 50 26 24 Coffee/Donut Shop with 2,108 259 132 127 110 55 55 Drive-Through Window 937 2,575 _................. Less Pass-by Trips(83%) (1,750) (215) (110) (105) (91) (46) (45) Net Proposed Trips 358 44 22 22 19 9 10 Net New Trips(Proposed—Existing) (411) (26) (13) (13) (31) (17) (14) Access Management No new accesses are proposed as the development will use the existing driveways along SW 78th Avenue and Highway 99W. Further, no new trips to the street system are proposed and thus, no access evaluation to address Section 18.705.030(H) of the Tigard Community Development Code is warranted at this time. SUMMARY Based on the trip generation estimate provided herein, the proposed drive-through coffee-shop development is expected to generate fewer daily trips compared to the former drive-through fast-food restaurant use and thus not expected to trigger additional off-site transportation analysis based on trip generation alone. Please call us at 503-228-5230 if you have any questions as you review this material. Sincerely, KITTELSON &ASSOCIATES, INC. Diego Arguea, PE Senior Engineer Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ' (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six (6) Months) TIGARD PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: 4/18/2017 at 10AM STAFF AT PRE-APP.: AK,KL NON-RESIDENTIAL APPLICANT: GPD Group AGENT: Rafia Darwish Phone: 330-572-3532 Phone: rdarwish@gpdgroup.com PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: 11701 SW Pacific Highway TAX MAPS)/LOT#(S): 1S136CD00100 NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: Site Development Review PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: Covert previous Arby's into a Starbucks. Work includes: new signage, expansion of outdoor seating area, drive-thru equipment, pavement replacement for ADA compliance,and shift drive-thru window. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: General Commercial ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: C-G ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Table 18.520.2) Minimum Lot width: 50 Feet Building Setback: 0 ft. (minimum) Side Setback: 0 ft. (minimum) Rear Setback: 0 ft. (minimum) Building Height: no minimum,45 ft. maximum Minimum Landscaping: 15% Maximum Coverage: 85% E NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, IN'I'ERES'I'ED PARTIES,AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. * NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. ® NARRATIVE (Refer to Code Chapter 18.390) The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section Z IMPACT STUDY (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050) As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system,the parks system,the water system,the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. ® ACCESS (Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.765) Minimum number of accesses:. 2 Minimum access width: 30 ft. Minimum pavement width: 24 ft curbs required. All driveways and parking areas,except for some fleet storage parking areas,must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: 200 ft. ® WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.705.030) WALKWAYS SHALL EX 1'END FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. ❑ SPECIAL SETBACKS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.730) ➢ STREETS: feet from the centerline of ➢ LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet,along the site's boundary. ➢ FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. ❑ SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS (Refer to Code Section 18.730.020.B.) BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS -Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: . A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; 1110 All actual building setbacks will be at least half(1/2) of the building's height; and P. The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. ❑ BUFFERING AND SCREENING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.745 &18.620) In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to your proposal area are: N/A feet along north boundary. _N/A feet along east boundary. NTA-- along south boundary. N/A feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION,SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section SCREENING: SPECIAL PROVISIONS- 18.745.050E Screening and landscaping of parking and loading areas is required per specifications in section 17.745.050E (1). In no cases shall nonconforming screening of parking and loading areas be permitted to become any less conforming. In addition, screening of service facilities and refuse areas also applies to all development with the exception of one and two family dwellings. ® LANDSCAPING (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.620) STREET TREES SHALL BE REQUIRED AS PART OF THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR A CONDITIONAL USE (TYPE III), DOWNTOWN DESIGN REVIEW (TYPE II & III), MINOR LAND PARTITION (TYPE II), PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (TYPE III), SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (TYPE II), AND SUBDIVISION (TYPE II & III). The minimum number of required street trees shall be determined by dividing the linear amount of street frontage within or adjacent to the site (in feet) by 40 feet (if the number is a fraction,round to the nearest whole number). The trees shall be placed within the public right-of-way whenever possible but no more than six (6) feet from the right-of-way boundary. Street trees shall be planted according to Section 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual and adequate soil volumes shall be provided in accordance with Section 12 of the Urban Forestry Manual. Existing trees may be used to meet the street standards. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. PARKING LOT TREES ARE REQUIRED AS PART OF THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR A CONDITIONAL USE (TYPE III), DOWNTOWN DESIGN REVIEW (TYPE II & III), PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (TYPE III),AND STYE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (TYPE II) All parking areas,including parking spaces and aisles, shall be required to achieve at least 30% tree canopy cover at maturity directly above the parking area in accordance with Section 13 of the Urban Forestry Manual. ® RECYCLING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.755) Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF STTL SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Pride Disposal can be reached at(503) 625-6177. ® PARKING (Refer to Code Section 18.765.040) REQUIRED parking for this type of use: 7 spaces/1,000 square feet= approximately 22 spaces (includes outdoor area) SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Multiple uses on site- submit site plan with all uses and all parking showing NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: s Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet,6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches. II. Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet,6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3)feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. HANDICAPPED PARKING: s All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions,is mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. s BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section n LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.765.080) Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. E BICYCLE RACKS (Refer to Code Section 18.765) BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. REQUIRED bicycle racks for this type of use: 4 SPACES n SENSITIVE LANDS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.775) The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS,WETLAND AREAS,ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT,OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. n STEEP SLOPES (Refer to Code Section 18.775.070.C) When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. E CLEAN WATER SERVICES (CWS) BUFFER STANDARDS (Refer to CWS R&O 07-20/USA Regulations-Chapter 3) LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETA'T'ED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION&ORDER 07-20 SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION SLOPE ADJACENT WIDTH OF VEGETATED TO SENSITIVE AREA4 CORRIDOR PER SIDES • Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25% I 10 to<50 acres 15 feet I >50 to <100 acres 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands<0.5 acre 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands>0.5 acre <25% 50 feet • Rivers,streams,and springs with year-round flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining>100 acres • Natural lakes and ponds • Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25% I 10 to <50 acres 30 feet I >50 to <100 acres 50 feet • Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure in 25- • Rivers,streams,and springs with year-round flow foot increments from the starting point to • Streams with intermittent flow draining>100 acres the top of ravine (break in <25%slope), • Natural lakes and ponds add 35 feet past the top of ravine° 4Starting point for measurement=edge of the defined channel(bankful flow)for streams/rivers,delineated wetland boundary,delineated spring boundary,and/or average high water for lakes or ponds,whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs,located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section corridor,shall not serve as a starting point for measurement. 5Vegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. 6The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet,if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor,except as provided for in the CUZS Design and Construction Standards. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREA'I ES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision,the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. CWS Service Provider Letter: PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the CWS R&O 07-20 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas,CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. ® SIGNS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.780) SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively,a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. Non-residential developments within the C-G zone shall meet the sign requirements for the commercial zones, 18.780.1300. ® URBAN FORESTRY PLAN (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.0 and the "Tree Canopy Requirements" Brochure) AN URBAN FORESTRY PLAN IS REQUIRED FOR THE FOLLOWING TYPES OF DEVELOPMENT: Conditional Use (Type III);Downtown Design Review(Type II and III);Minor Land Partition (Type II); Planned Development (Type III); Sensitive Lands Review (Type II and III); Site Development Review(Type II); and Subdivision (Type II and III). The plan needs to be prepared by an ISA certified arborist or landscaped architect. Percentage of mature canopy cover required: 33% (Refer to Appendix 2-6 in Urban Forestry Manual for a list of trees with mature canopy cover areas) An urban forestry plan shall: - Be coordinated and approved by a landscape architect (the project landscape architect) or a person possessing dual certifications as a certified arborist and certified tree risk assessor (the project arborist); - Meet the tree preservation and removal site plan standards in Section 10, part 1 of the Urban Forestry Manual; - Meet the tree canopy site plan standards in Section 10,part 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual;and - Meet the supplemental report standards in Section 10,part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual. TREE CANOPY FEE. If the effective percentage of tree canopy cover cannot be met, the applicant shall provide the city a tree canopy fee according to the methodology outlined in Section 10, part 4 of the Urban Forestry Manual. 18.790.040-Discretionary Urban Forestry Plan Review Option In lieu of providing payment of a tree canopy fee when less than the standard effective tree canopy cover required by Section 10, part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual will be provided, an applicant may apply for a discretionary urban forestry plan review. The discretionary urban forestry plan review cannot be used to modify an already approved urban forestry plan, any tree preservation or tree planting requirements established as part of another land use review approval, or any tree preservation or tree planting requirements required by another chapter in this title. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section Z PRESERVATION OF EXISTING TREES (Refer to Code Section 18.790.050.C.) To assist in the preservation and/or planting of trees and significant tree groves, the director may apply one or more of the following flexible standards as part of the land use review approval. Use of the flexible standards shall be requested by the project arborist or landscape architect as part of the land use review process. The flexible standards are only applicable to trees that are eligible for credit towards the effective tree canopy cover of the site. Appropriate species of trees in good condition and suitable for preservation receive a 200 percent credit based on their existing canopy area. Refer to Section 11-Part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual for submittal requirements. ® CLEAR VISION AREA (Refer to Code Chapter 18.795) The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. n ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.060) MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot-wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. CODE CHAPTERS n 18.330(Conditional Use) ❑ 18.610(Tigard Downtown Plan District) ® 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) n 18.340(Directors Interpretation) n 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) ❑ 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) n 18.350(Planned Development) n 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) ® 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) ® 18.360(Site Development Review) ❑ 18.640(Bridgeport Village Plan District) n 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) n 18.370(Variances/Adjustments) n 18.650(Durham Wastewater Facility) ® 18.765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) ❑ 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) ❑ 18.660(River Terrace Plan District) n 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) n 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) 18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation) ® 18.780(Signs) n 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) Ti 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) ❑ 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) ❑ 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) Ti 18.715(Density Computations) ® 18.790(Urban Forestry Plan) ❑ 18.420(Land Partitions) ❑ 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) ® 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) ❑ 18.430(Subdivisions) ® 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) n 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) ❑ 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) n 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) ® 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) ® 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) n 18.740(Historic Overlay) n 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) n 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: The project requires a full Site Development Review based on criteria in TDC 18.360.050.B A major modification is triggered when there is: (7) An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day Applicant Questions: Site Plan 1. Is location/orientation of outdoor seating restricted? Is an enclosure required for the outdoor seating CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section area? There are no standards for placement with the exception of meeting the site development criteria listed in 18.360.090. 2. Architectural requirements?No architectural or design requirements. 3. What are the processing timelines and approval process for land use? I Ock# -(s-ar 1/l.M D lq-12.wees 4. Is an engineering site plan, landscape plan required?A parking plan for overall site? Public meeting? All of these will be required. The only public meeting required is a neighborhood meeting. This application will not require a public hearing. Signage 1. Allowable wall sign calculation? 15% of the facade on which it is placed. 2. Requirements for a menu board sign?No specific requirements for menu signs. 3. Are directional signs permitted and how many and what size? Directional signs are allowed and are exempt from permit. Size and number is not specified,it must meet the following definition: "Directional sign" means a permanent sign which is designed and erected solely for the purpose of traffic or pedestrian direction and placed on the property to which the public is directed. Permitting 1. Can we submit building permit during land use review? No, land use approval shall be given prior to submittal of building permits. 2. What is required for the building permit submittal? Mark will address. a. Are plans routed to multiple departments? Building permits are generally routed to building, fire, engineering and planning. b. How much time is anticipated for plan review? Mark will address. 3. Can permit be submitted online or just walk-in? if walk in is required, is an appointment required? We do not accept them online,walk-in only.An appointed is not needed. PROCEDURE ZAdministrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 81/2" x 11". One,81/2" x 11" map of a proposed project shall be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Applications with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard Hearings Officer. A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section BUILDING PERMITS ` y PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEP'T'ED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE(unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). Prior to submittal of the application,you will need to schedule an appointment with the Permit Counter (503-718-2421). Please make the appointment as soon as possible, once you have all submittal elements. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. PREPARED BY: Agnes Kowacz CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION PHONE: 503-718-2429 EMAIL:Agnesk@tigard-or.gov TITLE 18 (CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE) INTERNET ADDRESS: www.tigard-or.gov CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section I www.tvfr.com Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue April 18, 2017 Rafia Darwish City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Starbucks PRE2017-00016 Tax Lot I.D: 1 S136CD00100 Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed site plan surrounding the above named development project. These notes are provided in regards to the pre-application meeting held on April 18, 2017. There may be more or less requirements needed based upon the final project design, however, Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue will endorse this proposal predicated on the following criteria and conditions of approval. FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS: 1. ACCESS DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved fire apparatus access roadways shall be installed and operational prior to any combustible construction or storage of combustible materials on the site. Temporary address signage shall also be provided during construction. (OFC 3309 and 3310.1) FIREFIGHTING WATER SUPPLIES: 2. COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS — REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The minimum fire flow and flow duration shall be determined in accordance with OFC Table B105.2. The required fire flow for a building shall not exceed the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi residual. (OFC B105.3) Note: OFC B106, Limiting Fire-Flow is also enforced, except for the following: • The maximum needed fire flow shall be 3,000 GPM, measured at 20 psi residual pressure. • Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue does not adopt Occupancy Hazards Modifiers in section B105.4-B105.4.1 3. FIRE FLOW WATER AVAILABILITY: Applicants shall provide documentation of a fire hydrant flow test or flow test modeling of water availability from the local water purveyor if the project includes a new structure or increase in the floor area of an existing structure. Tests shall be conducted from a fire hydrant within 400 feet for commercial projects, or 600 feet for residential development. Flow tests will be accepted if they were performed within 5 years as long as no adverse modifications have been made to the supply system. Water availability information may not be required to be submitted for every project. (OFC Appendix B) 4. WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved firefighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any combustible construction or storage of combustible materials on the site. (OFC 3312.1) Command&Business Operations Center South Operating Center Training Center and North Operating Center 8445 SW Elligsen Road 12400 SW Tonquin Road 11945 SW 70th Avenue Wilsonville,Oregon Sherwood,Oregon Tigard,Oregon 97223-9196 97070-9641 97140-9734 503-649-8577 503-259-1500 503-259-1600 FIRE HYDRANTS: 5. FIRE HYDRANTS—COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS: Where a portion of the building is more than 400 feet from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured in an approved route around the exterior of the building, on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided. (OFC 507.5.1) • This distance may be increased to 600 feet for buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system. • The number and distribution of fire hydrants required for commercial structure(s) is based on Table C105.1, following any fire-flow reductions allowed by section B105.3.1. Additional fire hydrants may be required due to spacing and/or section 507.5 of the Oregon Fire Code. 6.FIRE HYDRANT(S) PLACEMENT: (OFC C104) • Existing hydrants in the area may be used to meet the required number of hydrants as approved. Hydrants that are up to 600 feet away from the nearest point of a subject building that is protected with fire sprinklers may contribute to the required number of hydrants. (OFC 507.5.1) • Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by railroad tracks shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants unless approved by the Fire Marshal. • Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by divided highways or freeways shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. Heavily traveled collector streets may be considered when approved by the Fire Marshal. • Hydrants that are accessible only by a bridge shall be acceptable to contribute to the required number of hydrants only if approved by the Fire Marshal. 7. REFLECTIVE HYDRANT MARKERS: Fire hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of blue reflective markers. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the center line of the access roadway that the fire hydrant is located on. In the case that there is no center line, then assume a center line and place the reflectors accordingly. (OFC 507) 8. PHYSICAL PROTECTION: Where fire hydrants are subject to impact by a motor vehicle, guard posts, bollards or other approved means of protection shall be provided. (OFC 507.5.6 & OFC 312) 9. CLEAR SPACE AROUND FIRE HYDRANTS: A 3 foot clear space shall be provided around the circumference of fire hydrants. (OFC 507.5.5) 10. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION (FDC) LOCATIONS: FDCs shall be located within 100 feet of a fire hydrant(or as approved). Hydrants and FDC's shall be located on the same side of the fire apparatus access roadway or drive aisle, fully visible, and recognizable from the street or nearest point of the fire department vehicle access or as otherwise approved. (OFC 912.2.1 & NFPA 13) • Fire department connections (FDCs) shall normally be located remotely and outside of the fall-line of the building when required. FDCs may be mounted on the building they serve, when approved. • FDCs shall be plumbed on the system side of the check valve when sprinklers are served by underground lines also serving private fire hydrants. BUILDING ACCESS AND FIRE SERVICE FEATURES 11. KNOX BOX: A Knox Box for building access may be required for structures and gates. See Appendix B for further information and detail on required installations. Order via www.tvfr.com or contact TVF&R for assistance and instructions regarding installation and placement. (OFC 506.1) Commercial/Multi-Family 3.3.1—Page 2 12. FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT IDENTIFICATION: Rooms containing controls to fire suppression and detection equipment shall be identified as "Fire Control Room." Signage shall have letters with a minimum of 4 inches high with a minimum stroke width of 1/2 inch, and be plainly legible, and contrast with its background. (OFC 509.1) 13. PREMISES IDENTIFICATION: New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers; building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property, including monument signs. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Numbers shall be a minimum of 4 inches high with a minimum stroke width of 1/2 inch. (OFC 505.1) If you have questions or need further clarification, please feel free to contact me at 503-259-1504. Sincerely, 20/14.1, -2110V John Wolff Deputy Fire Marshal II Email John.Wolff@tvfr.com Cc: File http://www.tvfrcomiDocumentCenterNiew/1296 Commercial/Multi-Family 3.3.1—Page 3 TDT Estimate Starbucks 4/5/2017 11701 SW Pacific Highway AK TDT RATES EFFECTIVE 7/1/16 TSDC CITYWIDE &TSDT RT OVERLAY RATES EFFECTIVE 7/1/16 INSIDE RIVER TERRACE TSDC CITYWIDE EFFECTIVE 7/1/16 0 Yes Project is in River Terrace ? Q No Former Use Rate Type Use# ITE Code # Units Rate TDT Amount Description TDT 1 934 3 $27,001 $84,000 Restaurant TSDC-Imp 1 934 $5,488 $0 TSDC-Reim 1 934 $317 $0 TSDC-RT 1 210 $2,684 $0 Total TDT and TSDCs Former Uses $84,000 Proposed Use Use It ITE Code # Units Rate TDT Amount Description TDT 1 934 2.58 $27,001 $69,528 Coffee Shop TSDC-Imp 1 934 $5,488 $0 TSDC-Reim 1 934 $317 $0 TSDC-RT 1 210 $2,684 $0 TDT 2 934 0.54 $13,501 $7,236 Outdoor Patio TSDC-Imp 2 $0 TSDC-Reim 2 $0 TSDC-RT 2 $0 TDT 3 $0 TSDC-Imp 3 $0 TSDC-Reim 3 $0 TSDC-RT 3 $0 Total All TDTs &TSDCs Proposed Uses $76,764 Less: Total All TDTs &TSDCs Former Uses $84,000 --� Total All TDTs&TSDCs Net Increase ($7,236) rN.0 l �� Redevelopment discount, 20 year old building= .75 x$84,000=$63,000 Amount due $21,000 $0 TDT TSDC Imp+ Reim Target Recovery Rate 28.0% 30% Estimated Total Impact $0 $0 Estimated Unmitigated Impact $0 $0 All TDT&TDSC TSDC RT Overlay Target Recovery Rate #DIV/0! 30% Estimated Total Impact $0 $0 Estimated Unmitigated Impact $0 $0 TDT=County Transportation Development Tax TSDC Citywide=City of Tigard Transportation System Development Tax(TSDC-Imp&TSDC-Reim) TSDC RT=River Terrace Transportation System Development Tax Overlay Parks Estimate Starbucks 4/5/2017 11701 SW Pacific Highway AK ALL PARKS RATES EFFECTIVE 7/1/16 Q Yes I Project is in River Terrace ? @ No Note: All Neigh-Imp# Units entries= 0 if project is in River Terrace; All Neigh-RT# Units entries= 0 if project is elsewhere in the city. Former Use Rate Type Use # ITE Code # Units Rate Parks Amount Description Parks-Imp 1 934 7 $376 $2,632 Restaurant Parks-Reim 1 934 7 $68 $476 0 Neigh-Imp 1 934 7 $0 $0 0 Neigh-RT 1 210 7 $0 $0 0 2 $0 Total Parks Former Uses $3,108 Proposed Use Use # ITE Code # Units Rate Parks Amount Description Parks-Imp 1 934 6 $376 $2,256 Coffee Shop Parks-Reim 1 934 6 $68 $408 0 Neigh-Imp 1 934 6 $0 $0 0 Neigh-RT 1 210 $0 $0 0 Parks-Imp 2 934 1.00 $376 $376 Outdoor Patio Parks-Reim 2 934 1.00 $68 $68 0 Neigh-Imp 2 934 1.00 $0 $0 0 Neigh-RT 2 $0 $0 0 Total Parks Outside RT Proposed Uses $3,108 Less: Total Parks Outside RT Former Uses $3,108 Total All Parks Outside RT Net Increase $0 No pAkics D1A (- Total Parks RT Proposed Uses $0 Less: Total Parks RT Former Uses $0 Total All Parks RT Net Increase $0 Total Parks-Imp $0 Total Parks-Reim $0 Total Neigh-Imp $0 $0 Total Neigh-RT $0 For Non-Residential Calculations: Prior Use: Restaurant 450sf/EE; 3111/450=7EEs. Proposed Use: Coffee Shop=450sf/EE; 2575/450=EEs.536/450=1.19 Parks-Imp=Parks Improvement,Citywide including River Terrace Parks-Reim=Parks Reimbursement,Citywide including River Terrace Neigh-Imp=Neighborhood Parks Improvement Outside River Terrace Neigh-RT=Neighborhood Parks Improvement Inside River Terrace RECEIVED City of Tigard 1:111111COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APR 0 4 2017 Pre-Application Conference T I G A RD tiMmii i1; FNrlNFFRING PROJECT DESCRIPTION REQUIRED SUBMITTAL Project name/title: Proposed Starbucks ELEMENTS Please write a brief description of proposed project: (Note: applications will not be accepted The project will be a conversion of the former Arby's space to without the required submittal elements) a proposed Starbucks drive-thru with an outdoor seating area. 5 COPIES OF EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: Site work will be limited to new signage, drive-thru equipment, and possible pavement replacement near the north entry as ISI Brief description of the proposal and any site-specific questions/issues that needed for ADA compliance. The drive-thru window will be you would like to have staff research shitted east to lenggthen the drive-thru stack. prior to the meeting. PROPERTY INFO 1 MATION KI Site Plan.The site plan must show the Property address/location(s): 11701 SW Pacific Hwy, Tigard, OR 97223 proposed lots and/or building layouts drawn to scale. Also,show the location of the subject property in relation to the nearest streets;and the Tax map and tax lot #(s): 1 S136CD00100 locations of driveways on the subject property and across the street. Zoning: C-G XI Vicinity Map. PROPERTY OWNER/HOLDER INFORMATION ® The Proposed Uses. Name(s): Wyse Investment Rj Topographic Information. Include Contour Lines if Possible. Filing Fee. Included in separate Address: 801 SE Belmont Phone: envelope. City/state: Portland, OR Zip: 97214 APPLICANT INFORMATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Name: GPD Group (for Starbucks) Case No.: PiZE2011 — 0001 Address: 400 N. 34th Street, Suite 216 Phone: 330-572-3532 Related Case No.(s): City/state: Seattle, WA 98102 Zip: 98103 Application fee: 049 Contact person: Rafia Darwish Application accepted: Phone: 330-572-3532 Email: rdarwish@gpdgroup.com By: itYl° Date: I Z1 I 1 Pre-application Conference Information Date of pre-app: -i/ 1 Q / i 7 All of the information identified on this form is required and must be Time of pre-app: 1 U CI(n submitted to the Planning Division a minimum of ten (10) days prior to officially scheduling a pre-application conference. Pre-application Planner assigned to pre-app: conferences are one (1) hour long and are typically held between the I:\CURPLN\Masters\Land Use Applications Rev.01/06/2015 hours of 9-11 a.m. on either Tuesday or Thursday mornings. Pre-application conferences must be scheduled in person at the Community Development counter from 8-4:30 p.m. Monday—Thursday. If more than four(4)people are expected to attend the pre-application conference in your group, please inform the city in advance so that alternate room arrangements can be made to accommodate the group. City of Tigard • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard,Oregon 97223 • wwwtigard-or.gov • 503-718-2421 • Page 1 of 1 RECEIVEL Akron Office APR 0 4 2 01( 520 South Main Street tel 330.572.2100 10. Suite 2531 CITY OF TI( fax 330.572.2101 /. GPD GROUP. Akron,OH 4431NINGi ENG',www. pd rou .com 9 4 P Glaus,Pyle,Schomer,Burns&DeHaven,Inc. Community Development Department 03 April 2017 City of Tigard 2016355.37 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 503-718-2421 Re: Proposed Starbucks—11701 SW Pacific Highway Pre-Application Narrative To Whom It May Concern: GPD Group is requesting a pre-application conference on behalf of a proposed Starbucks project located at 11701 SW Pacific Highway. The site is situated at the northwest corner of SW Pacific Highway and 78th Avenue.The proposed Starbucks coffee shop will include a 2,575 SF building with an outdoor seating area and drive-thru services. At this time,we would like to request preliminary review and have attached site-related questions. -'_- _I_ STEV -- ;:1 Q 2l7N W14.1 t— > Q r.. 0 I— I LI) ® ki PFAFFLE ST PFAFFLE ST _,_m w I yr 4 W J • I-- < l rr. rn d ( r LOM Kinder-Care / Leat rung Cornet #1243 / BAYLOR ST if/ T I G A RD 0:S1 CLINTON ST .VL G(G� ./ \\1\1)1 1 Current Owner: Applicant on Behalf of Starbucks: Wyse Investment Rafia Darwish,of Glaus, Pyle, Schomer, Burns& 810 SE Belmont DeHaven, Inc. Portland, OR 97214 dba. GPD Group 400 N. 34th Street, Suite 216 Proposed Lessee: Seattle,WA 98103 Starbucks Coffee Company 330-572-3532 2401 Utah Ave.South rdarwish@gpdgroup.com Seattle,WA 98134 Tigard, OR 2 of 2 03 April 2017 The questions attached are meant for various city departments. It is understood that it may not be possible to receive definite answers on all questions at this time. Please contact me with any questions regarding this letter or the proposed Starbucks project at 330-572-3532. Respectfully, •pc‘...6Lt. AbtitA:Afvt„%_ Rafia Darwish, El Project Coordinator GPD Group Tigard, OR : Pre-application Conference Questions: RECEIVED Planning & Building Departments APR 0 4 2017 Layout/Site Plan Questions: CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING/ENGINEERING - General discussion of layout and site requirements. - Is location and orientation of outdoor seating restricted? Is an enclosure required at the proposed outdoor seating area? - Are there any architectural requirements that will be reviewed during the land use approval process? - Please provide further information on the land use approval process, timeline, routing, etc. o Is an engineered site plan or landscape plan required? o Is a parking calculation for the overall site required? o Is a public meeting required? Signage: - What is the allowable wall sign calculation? - Are there restrictions on the location and orientation of the menu board/drive-thru equipment? - Are directional signs permitted? If so, how many?What is the permitted size? Permitting: - Can a building permit submittal be made during land use review? - What is required for the building permit submittal? o Are plans routed to multiple departments? o How much time should be anticipated for plan review? - Can the building permit submittal be mailed in or submitted online? If a walk-in submittal is required, is an appointment necessary? tr\K1 K!TT E L S 0 N 610 SW ALDER STREET,SUITE 700 & A S S O G f A T E S ,OR 97205 PP� D503 228.52330 F 503.273.8169 April 17, 2017 Project#: 21215 Kim McMillan City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Trip Generation Assessment-Drive-Through Coffee Shop Dear Kim, This letter documents the trip generation change associated with the proposed renovation of a fast food restaurant building with a drive-through, located on the northwest corner of the Highway 99W/SW 78th Avenue intersection in Tigard, Oregon. The existing fast food restaurant building is located within a shopping center development with full vehicle access from SW 78th Avenue and limited access (right-in/right-out) from Highway 99W. There are nine striped parking spaces along the building frontage, and a larger parking field is shared with the shopping center development. The applicant seeks to permit and renovate the existing fast food restaurant building as a drive-through coffee shop with indoor seating, which is expected to generate fewer system-wide daily trips than the fast-food restaurant land use. As a result, no trip vesting or off-site traffic analysis is anticipated to be required as a result of trip generation alone. Additional details of the proposed development and trip generation characteristics are provided herein. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The existing fast food restaurant building is approximately 3,042 gross square feet and will be maintained but renovated for the proposed coffee shop development. After renovations and the addition of an outdoor patio, the coffee shop gross building size will be approximately 2,575 square feet. The existing drive-through will also remain, and the development team is currently working to identify the most efficient use of the drive through while minimizing the impact to the parking field. TRIP GENERATION ASSESSMENT Trip generation estimates for the proposed development are based on trip rates from Trip Generation, 9th Edition (publishes by the Institute of Transportation Engineers). The trip generation is summarized in Table 1. As shown in Table 1, the proposed coffee shop is estimated to generate approximately 358 net new daily trips, 44 net new weekday AM peak hour trips, and 19 weekday PM peak hour trips. Compared to FILENAME:K:I H PORTLAND I PROJFILEI21215- 77GARD STARBUCKSI REPORT1 DRAFT121215TRIPGEN APRIL 17.DOCX Trip Generation Assessment-Drive-Through Coffee Shop Project#:21215 April17,2017 Page:2 an a fast food restaurant, the proposed coffee shop is estimated to generate 411 fewer daily trips, 26 fewer weekday AM trips, and 31 fewer weekday PM peak hour trips. Table 1 Trip Generation Estimate Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Trips Size Daily Land Use ITE (square feet) Trips Total In Out Total In Out Existing Use 111110 Fast-food Restaurant with Drive Through 1,510 138 70 68 100 52 48 934 3,042 Less Pass-by Trips(49%) (740) (68) (35) (33) (50) (26) (24) Net Existing Trips 770 70 35 35 50 26 24 jillMglaIIIIIIIdllMillIllroposed Use Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive Through Window 2,108 259 132 127 110 55 55 _._...._._.... _................................................ 937 2,575 Less Pass-by Trips(83%) (1,750) (215) (110) (105) (91) (46) (45) Net Proposed Trips 358 44 22 22 19 9 10 Net New Trips(Proposed—Existing) (411) (26) (13) (13) (31) (17) (14) Access Management No new accesses are proposed as the development will use the existing driveways along SW 78th Avenue and Highway 99W. Further, no new trips to the street system are proposed and thus, no access evaluation to address Section 18.705.030(H) of the Tigard Community Development Code is warranted at this time. SUMMARY Based on the trip generation estimate provided herein, the proposed drive-through coffee-shop development is expected to generate fewer daily trips compared to the former drive-through fast-food restaurant use and thus not expected to trigger additional off-site transportation analysis based on trip generation alone. Please call us at 503-228-5230 if you have any questions as you review this material. Sincerely, KITTELSON &ASSOCIATES, INC. Diego Arguea, PE Senior Engineer Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon \i NOTES: } Q EXISTING STORM SEWER OIL-WATER SEPERATOR 1 THERE WAS NO OBSERVED EVIDENCE OF CURRENT RIM ELEV.=225.90 EARTH MOVING WORK, BUILDING CONSTRUCTION OR FLOW.-224.62 BUILDING ADDITIONS AT THE TIME OF THIS SURVEY. -{2a1•)-_ —-...:. ........ M SEWERCATCH BASIN EXISTING STOR 2 THERE WAS NO OBSERVED EVIDENCE OF THIS SITE FLOW. ICAL PPE-DIRECTION UNKNOWN)=224.94 BEING USED ASA SOLID WASTE DUMP,SUMP OR {VERT SANITARY LANDFILL AT THE TIME OF THIS SURVEY. Q3 EXISTING STORM SEWER CATCH BASIN 3. ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY ARE NOT RIM=229.23 -�.^.:.::.�. -' '• fz3o)�. :• i`'4::_',i.:r: ? -„•„ ,..,,.-,,. �,....1 _ ACTUAL ELEVATIONS.THE VERTICAL DATUMS BASED .:....::., IE OUT 12-EAST=226.97 ON AN ASSUMED ELEVATION OF 228.00 ON A 5ILEL E ::: STORM SEWER CATCH BASINSOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE AS SHOWN � LANESPIKE SET IN THE EXISTING PARKING LOT AT TH ::: ::SUBJ'EC:T::'PROP••ERTY.'::..:- ':::•••:•• :.'.:::::.'::.:::::•'::::.:-.•' ......,:..•. :....:. _:...'. 4 DUSTING G 9�.�•�� IE OUT 12 EAST=220 34 4 PROPERTY IS ZONED CG(GENERAL .: :::::. ::'..:::':'.:�::�Pt�•C.rCL:'�T :::.•.. ....................... .. �...:.:.::.:..':':•.••:•::::: � COMMERCI ) Q STORM SEWER CATCH THE SLI .. • _ ....•� . .. ....... .. RIM 223.90 ti f@ ..... LE :... '•-� :':::� ::::. .•.-s.�-�-•;�;•-�!. ���� 224.STORM .:::1•`.- ..... . ...:•:-:.: •-..... .. . i .. S� IEMOUT 12 EAST=2t 909 HO IE IN 12'WEST=219.26 �' tP ':'.: .:..... :...... .,fi :.':.: .... .. .... ...... IE IN 6 NORTHWEST=219.82 IE IN 12 SOUTH=220 56 ::::::.. . ........ ........•::._.1:.::.:.:-:. •::.'::::'::::.:: .� .-.:'' ��•�` CD EXISTING STORM SEWER OIL-WATER SEF'ERATOR ..... ... ........ . ..y.'..:::•: .:..::::.:•:� RIM ELEV.=226.35 �.:•: :.::.:..... :::.:':'..::::::.::.... ....:.. FLOW.=225.21 g 1• 'ti:. • • ... ........ .:.: x'.`..:• :••:: ::::•::�::::•::•.-•::-::•.:••• ::::•:•:: ..::•:...:::'.::.:`::.:' .;..;'::::'::::.::. ::•::.•.• :::: ”. = .. CP SPIKE ... ..... .... ,F..... ,.�. • r-..�.�� (ASSUMED) : CLEANOUT ! - :./..... .... .-tom. ::q.: -• +� '•L � � /. . ...,... ,( • � f1, -:'�•ice ,. •..: RECEIVED - „ :'�i I 4 01 rrill�, �� APR 0 .. , ,,.... . . .••• •. .,. ) .„ EXISTING BLDG. '::::: CITY OF TI > !� •: �. � 3,111 S.F.t I 1� ..::•..:::..•/::::::::::* ..•!'. c f' • J j R41 rk "CROSSWALK .. ... . .... .. ,, CLOSED" muuulli .� LEGEND ' . _ - � ;- :'�.:•.• ':!• '-t: '�' 1 �:.1" - F •t ' fr :::-.-:-:::.:::..':::•:...• ... ... •-.....:,....:-:.......::::.,:—..':-......:....• :. \ :,-- -....-..•••••••-•...-::::::::L:.. L:'. .• • TRASHS/ 1 • 'd1 xt •y� � : EXISTING FENCE • • EXISTING PROPERTY BOUNDARY :1: ENCLOSURE .�• :y':' • ••••• ' '. — r w EXISTING WATERLINE (\ . i — w. EXISTING POWERUNDERGROUN D :y ray EXISTING POWER (OVERHEAD) .... .I• y r.1 • ' �.--�i•j1. !9• © _ » EXISTING SANITARY SEWER �i ;-� :';: .Y: •�.' , � � .y _ .,. EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING GAS LINE 1-":7'7"7"...7"."."7 •,-, .•:•..•.,.'.....':, -110--::.:.:::-.•:-.:.:• GAS 9� O r TELECOMMUNICATIONS : ! EXISTING UNDERGROUND TEL C : • G 9 •?• •f,.::• •}t.••• Q (•L EXISTING EDGE OF ASPHALT EXISTING ASPHALT :1' J� /• Q'� I , %'I EXISTING CONCRETE I.•.•. .•1 EXISTING LANDSCAPING .:. EXISTING• oLLARD : •� .d ; EXISTING SIGN AS NOTED f:. Q EXISTING POWER POLE 0 EXISTING LIGHT POLE • • EXISTING STREET LIGHT t. .:``- ; '..'. \GC` �P a EXISTING WATER/GAS VALVE ft�• *:.' , ... `G•'q�,d 406:1 EXISTING GASMETER• •d� •:f!•LAC �P�\G�` FJU TNG WATER METER ••j''. �•• a • l''' \G� EXISTING TREE SCALk`. 1" = 20' DATE 12/ts/ts ' REGISTERED DRAWN: BHK ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SURVEYED: NF/RO REVISIONS 809 5E Pine Street L• •11 URVEYOR SHEET NO. CHECKED: BHK LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, • Roseburg, Oregon 97470 DATE DEscRIPrION: WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON e PHONE(541) 673-0166 DRAWING NAME FAX (541) 440-9392 O GON TOPOGRAPHY MAP �ENGINE�R1NGIiemailAieengineenng.com 010 RENT t 1a AP 3 3 FOR: GPD GROUP, 4600 E. WASHINGTON ST., SUITE 310, PHOENIX, AZ., 85034 "sins"� J 1 Zoe No.: FIELD SURVEYED: NOVEMBER 29, 2016 l I 2888-05 - EXPIRES: 6/3O/zo1 7 I , 4tte SHEET NOTES ..)r '. A i 1. NEW WAYFINDING GRAPHICS 2. NEW DRIVE THRU LANE(EXPANDED TO 12'-0") 3. NEW CLEARANCE BAR W / \\--_ 4. NEW DRIVE THRU DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE 5. NEW PRE-MENU BOARD ©2015 STgi BUCKS COFFEE COMPANY 6. NEW BOLLARD STARBUCKS COFFEE 7. NEW ORDER POINT CANOPY AND DIGITAL ORDER SCREEN Z COMPANY O o 8. NEW 5-PANEL MENU BOARD 9. EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE Q 2401 UTAH AVENUE SOUTH 4 SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98134 (206)318-1575 10.NEW RELOCATED DRIVE THRU WINDOW THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE L. 11.NEW DRIVE THRU DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE('THANK YOU/EXIT ONLY') U CONFIDENTIAL AND SHALL REMAIN THE SOLE PROPERTY OF STARBUCKS CORPORATION, 12.NEW OUTDOOR SEATING AREA PATIO(+-500 SF) = WHICH IS THE OWNER OF THE COPYRIGHT IN — THIS WORK.THEY SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED O 13.NEW BIKE RACK /�/ (IN WHOLE OR IN PART),SHARED WITH THIRD LL PARTIES OR USED IN ANY MANNER ON OTHER 14 ',1,'_-_-_111 -- 14.EXISTING PARKING PROJECTS OR EXTENSIONS TO THIS PROJECT I: WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF 4 3 15.EXISTING TRANSFORMER. I— STARBUCKS CORPORATION.THESE DRAWINGS (�, AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE INTENDED TO — EXPRESS DESIGN INTENT FOR A Z PROTOTYPICAL STARBUCKS STORE(WHICH IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE AT ANYTIME)AND DO NOT __.,1--.....-- REFLECT ACTUAL SITE CONDITIONS.NEITHER I j ; /7 �L- O PARTY SHALL HAVE ANY OBLIGATION NOR U___ si �] LIABILITY TO THE OTHER(EXCEPT STATED 1 cP.y U ABOVE) EXECUTEDNTIL A ITTEN IS FULLY BY BOTH PARTIES D - - A/ I STARBUCKS TEMPLATE VERSION 12016-05-27 ® O©© O © ., 1, Q ARCHITECT OF RECORD �yUI 'r i\ .` .- I U. THIS DRAWING ISA DESIGN DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENT.SITE MI - , SPECIFIC MODIFICATIONS MADE UNDER THE RESPONSIBLE `— I 0 CHARGE OF THE ARCHITECT I�� m \s, o Ii I ` __ W AND/OR BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO TO 13 :,,..11,,,.,..46,..it,, ❑ UBIDDINGSING ,PS EERMITTING,OR OCUMENT R 12'-0" O .I='M „ CONSTRUCTION. -- ii z ,--T1111/WO UJ I 1111 � o I iis 4, ) � �� � ';r.-,, APR o 4 2017 0 6 \ .\- ' z ��Q�� ---�����