Correspondence (7) NNST40 - ( c
Ne
Albert Shields
From: Albert Shields
Sent: Wednesday,April 11, 2018 5:49 PM
To: 'chingtai@comcast.net
Cc: Jonny Gish;#Building Permit Technicians
Subject: FW: MST2017-00253; LIDA Revision
Attachments: Albert Shields2.vcf
Hi, Diane. I thought it would make things as clear as possible if I forwarded to you this exchange I just had with our
Engineering Technician. As I understand it, using the soakage trench design is fine for now but it needs to be enlarged to
meet CleanWater Services specifications. The LIDA connections will have to be made as part of the subdivision. Please
have the soakage trench design revised to meet the CWS specs and let me know when you submit it. Meanwhile I will
classify this application as"Revision Needed" until it is complete.
Thank you for your cooperation. Please let me know if you still have questions.
Albert Shields
City of Tigard
Permit Coordinator
i' 33I 718-2426 rk
A.Ibert vtigard-or.gov
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, Oregon 97217
www.tigard-or.gov
From:Jonny Gish
Sent:Tuesday,April 10, 2018 3:13 PM
To:Albert Shields<albert@tigard-or.gov>
Subject: RE: MST2017-00253; LIDA Revision
She needs to revise the size to meet CWS'standard
Jonny
From:Albert Shields
Sent:Tuesday,April 10, 2018 2:13 PM
To:Jonny Gish<Jonny@tigard-or.gov>
Subject: RE: MST2017-00253; LIDA Revision
Jonny, does she still need to revise the "soakage trench" design sheet or can we release the MST? Thanks,Albert.
From:Jonny Gish
Sent:Tuesday,April 10, 2018 1:15 PM
To:Albert Shields<albert@tigard-or.gov>; Khoi Le<khoi@tigard-or.gov>
Subject: RE: MST2017-00253; LIDA Revision
1
•
Diane,
Since you are discharging directly to Fanno Creek you are not required to detain Stormwater, however you are required
to treat. Additionally, since you are discharging onto private property Mark,the Building Official and the head of the
Building Department, has jurisdiction over this matter. Khoi has jurisdiction over public infrastructure and public right-
of-way.
This is not preventing you from discharging with the "soakage trench",we are only informing you that when you come in
for Land-Use for the Subdivision all lots within the development will be required to hook up to the public Stormwater
system.
Let me know if you have further questions.
Jonny Gish
City of Tigard: Engineering
Senior Technician
503-718-2467
From:Albert Shields
Sent:Tuesday,April 10, 2018 10:18 AM
To: Khoi Le<khoi@tigard-or.gov>;Jonny Gish<Jonny@tigard-or.gov>
Subject: FW: MST2017-00253; LIDA Revision
Gentlemen, would you please sort this out as to what the applicant needs to do? It seems that the hookup described
below is not what she was told during a pre-app.
Thanks,Albert.
From: Chingtai Hsu<chingtai@comcast.net>
Sent: Monday,April 9,2018 10:05 PM
To:Albert Shields<albertCc@tigard-or.gov>
Subject: Re: MST2017-00253; LIDA Revision
Hi Al,
Good to hear from you.
During our pre-application, Khoi said we did not need storm hookup because of Fanno Creek nearby
so the proposed swale for dissipation looked good. May I know who Mark is and why his opinion is
different than Khoi's? Do I need to clarify with Khoi?
Thanks,
2
Diane.
On April 9, 2018 at 4:09 PM Albert Shields<albert@tigard-or.gov>wrote:
Dear Ms. Hsu and Vadim: Upon reviewing the modified LIDA plans that you submitted on
March 29, 2018, Engineering had the following comments:
"HSU SFR: MST2017-00253—The applicant will need to revise the LIDA to meet CWS
standard. Specifically, the LIDA is too small and will need to be at least 158 square feet(2640 X
.06). Additionally, Branden will be putting a parcel tag to ensure that when the full development
project(6 lot Subdivision) is complete, this house will be required to connect to public storm on
SW 76th, which will be built by the subdivision(Per Mark). Therefore, the LIDA will need to
have drainage outlets on the east and west side of the LIDA. The east side will be operable,
while the west side needs to be capped until they can connect to public storm. "
Please revise and re-submit plans for the LIDA accordingly and please let me know if you have
any questions.
Albert Shields
City of Tigard
Permit Coordinator
15C3; 71 -2426Work
Albert: tigard-or,gov
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, Oregon 97217
vwvw.tigard-or.gov
DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to
public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless
exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the
City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules "City General
Records Retention Schedule."
3
Workflow Task Status List Page 1 of 1
MST2017-00253-HSU
This record was locked by REQUIREMENT on 2018-04-05.
Condition:Severity:Required
Total conditions:1 (Required: 1)
Learn more about this requirement and how to resolve it
Menu New Supervisor Task Activation Help
g Workflow Tasks Task Status
[5-0,Application Submittal
Application Submittal Route
_ ? Revisions Revisions Route
(jy Building Review Building Review Approve
[,`a- ].Planning Review Planning Review Approve
Via,Engineering Review Engineering Review ,q� ryG Revision
[ -C3,Permit Coordinator Review Permit Coordinator Review Approve
}-r].Post Review Post Review Ready to
., Issue Permit Issue
fid"Issue Permit Inspections
f4}`_[j Inspections C of O
L5-C3 C of O
There currently are no ad hoc tasks defined.
https://ay.accela.com/portlets/workflow/workflowStatusList.do?module=Building 4/9/2018
Albert Shields
From: Albert Shields
Sent: Monday, April 9, 2018 4:09 PM
To: 'LVICustom@gmail.com'; 'chingtai@comcast.net'
Cc: Jonny Gish
Subject: MST2017-00253; LIDA Revision
Attachments: Albert Shields.vcf
Dear Ms. Hsu and Vadim: Upon reviewing the modified LIDA plans that you submitted on March 29, 2018, Engineering
had the following comments:
"HSU SFR: MST2017-00253—The applicant will need to revise the LIDA to meet CWS standard. Specifically,the LIDA is
too small and will need to be at least 158 square feet(2640 X .06). Additionally, Branden will be putting a parcel tag to
ensure that when the full development project(6 lot Subdivision) is complete,this house will be required to connect to
public storm on SW 76th, which will be built by the subdivision (Per Mark). Therefore,the LIDA will need to have
drainage outlets on the east and west side of the LIDA. The east side will be operable, while the west side needs to be
capped until they can connect to public storm. "
Please revise and re-submit plans for the LIDA accordingly and please let me know if you have any questions.
Albert Shields
City of Tigard.
Permit Coordinator
( 13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, Oregon 97217
www.tigard-or.gov
1
Albert Shields
From: Dianna Howse
Sent: Friday,April 6, 2018 8:47 AM
To: Jonny Gish
Cc: #Building Permit Technicians; Khoi Le; Mark VanDomelen; Gary Pagenstecher;Albert
Shields
Subject: RE: red folders
Jonny,
Branden and I talked about the parcel tag placed on MST2017-00253 for Hsu. This parcel tag affects only this lot,which
is not tied to the 6 lots in the subdivision that should be prevented from getting a C of 0 until the lot for MST2017-00253
has connected to public storm. When the MSTs are created for the 6 lots, a note in the case description should say
"HOLD C of 0 for completion of MST2017-00253 to connect to public storm". The challenge is for someone to
remember to do this on all of the MSTs that are created when they come in because the parcel tag on MST2017-00253
will not display as a warning when creating the new MSTs. I would suggest that this be done by engineering when
reviewing the intake routing form for the MSTs in this subdivision.
Thank you and please let me know if you have any questions.
Dianna L. Howse
Building Division Services Supervisor
City of Tigard I Community Development
13125 SW Hall Blvd I Tigard, OR 97223
503-718-2430 Direct 1503-718-2439 Permits
From:Jonny Gish
Sent: Friday,April 6, 2018 8:17 AM
To:Albert Shields<albert@tigard-or.gov>
Cc:#Building Permit Technicians<TigardBuildingPermits@tigard-or.gov>; Khoi Le<khoi@tigard-or.gov>; Mark
VanDomelen<markv@tigard-or.gov>; Gary Pagenstecher<Garyp@tigard-or.gov>
Subject: red folders
Albert
RPC EXTRA SOTRAGE: MST2017-00268—This project has Engineering Conditions still unmet(#9,#15,#25) including the
PFI which has not been issued (we are waiting on the return of Assurance, paying PFI Fees and agreement of the
Bike/Pedestrian easement). Planning also has Conditions unmet(Gary?). I talked to Dale(Colorado Construction)
yesterday about this project. He said he would be get information and trying to clear these conditions.
HSU SFR: MST2017-00253—The applicant will need to revise the LIDA to meet CWS standard. Specifically,the LIDA is
too small and will need to be at least 158 square feet(2640 X .06). Additionally, Brandon will be putting a parcel tag to
ensure that when the full development project(6 lot Subdivision) is complete,this house will be required to connect to
public storm on SW 76th,which will be built by the subdivision (Per Mark). Therefore,the LIDA will need to have
drainage outlets on the east and west side of the LIDA. The east side will be operable,while the west side needs to be
capped until they can connect to public storm. Please see me if clarification is needed.
Jonny Gish