Loading...
Permit (37) CITY OF TIGARD MASTER PERMIT 111111'--�', COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Permit#: MST2018 00072 TE t D 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard OR 97223 503.718.2439 Date Issued: 03/06/2018 Parcel: 2S112BC01203 Jurisdiction: Tigard Site address: 14575 SW 81ST AVE Subdivision: DURHAM ACRES Lot: 70 Project: FAST Project Description: 186 sq. ft. bedroom addition. BUILDING Floor Areas Required Setbacks Required Stories: 0 Bedrooms: 0 First: 0 sf Basement: 0 sf Left: 0 Parking Spaces: 0 Height: 0 Bathrooms: 0 Second: 186 sf Garage: 0 sf Front: 0 Smoke Dwelling Units: 0 Third: 0 sf Right 0 Detectors: Total: 186 sf Value: $21,176.10 Rear: 0 PLUMBING Sinks: 0 Water Closets: 0 Washing Mach: 0 Laundry Trays: 0 Rain Drain: 0 Urinals: 0 Lavatories: 0 Dishwashers: 0 Floor Drains: 0 Sewer Lines: 0 SF Rain 0 Storm Sewer 0 Tubs/Showers: 0 Garbage Disp: 0 Water Heaters: 0 Water Lines: 0 Drains: Bckflw Prevntr: 0 Catch Basins: 0 Footing Drain: 0 Ice Maker: 0 Hose Bib: 0 Backwater Value: 0 Drywell-Trench Drain: 0 Other Fixtures: 0 Other Fixture Units: MECHANICAL Fuel Types Air Conditioning: N Vent Fans: 0 Clothes Dryers: 0 Heat Pump: N Hoods: 0 Other Units: 0 Furn<100K: 0 Vents: 0 Woodstoves: 0 Gas Outlets: 0 Furn>=100K: 0 ELECTRICAL Residential Unit Service Feeder Temp Srvc/Feeders Branch Circuits 1000 sf or less: 0 0-200 amp: 0 0-200 amp: 0 W/Svc or Fdr: 0 Ea add'I 500 sf: 0 201-400 amp: 0 201-400 amp: 0 W/O Svc/Fdr: 0 Mfd Home/Feeder/Svc: 0 401-600 amp: 0 401-600 amp: 0 601-1000 amp: 0 601+amp-1000v: 0 1000+amp/volt: 0 ELECTRICAL-RESTRICTED ENERGY SF Residential Audio&Stereo: N HVAC: N Security Alarm: N Vaccuum System: N Garage Opener N All Other: N Other Description: Ecompasing: N BUILDING INFO Class of Work: Type of Use: Type of Constr: Occupancy G ALT p yrou p: Square Feet: SF VB R-3 186 Owner: Contractor: FAST,MARK J&MADAE F MARK&MADAE FAST Required Items and Reports(Conditions) 14575 SW 81ST AVE 14592 SW 81ST AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 PHONE: PHONE: 503-598-1166 FAX: Total Fees: $1,120.32 This permit is issued subject to the regulations contained in the Tigard Municipal Code, State of OR. Specialty Codes and all other applicable law, All work will be done in accordance with approved plans. This permit will expire if work is not started within 180 days of issuance, or if work is suspended for more the 180 days. ATTENTION: Oregon law requires you to follow the rules adopted by the Oregon Utility Notification Center. Those rules are set forth in OAR 952-001-0010 through OAR 952-001-0090. You may o• a c•.' •f the rules or direct questions to OUNC by calling 503.232.1987 or 1.800,3 .2344. Issued By:rP ` Permittee Signature: ( ��� 47 Call 503.639.4175 by 7:00 a.m.for the next available inspection date. This permit card shall be kept in a conspicuous place on the job site until completion of the project. Approved plans are required on the job site at the time of each inspection. Bu�i'lldin2 Permit Application -1 RI8 a� • Re idential 7 Eewt1 PermitNo.: ` R.�� 7CR11 r 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 i EB 2i /; 1? . ^ )Q 1) other Permit: Phone: 503.718.2439 Fax: 503.598.1960 Date/By: Ery ate ReadyBy: y,.Jurist H See Page 2 for T t GAi:t? IntLine: 503.639.4175 '1 1 + l II otified/Method: /. Me. f ��r► I /9"- Supplemental Information Internet: www tigazd or gov &,79/L g1-3 f, i 3 � co ❑New construction 0 Demolition Permit fees*are based on the value of the work performed. Indicate the value(rounded to the nearest dollar)of all ®Addition/alteration/replacement ❑Other: equipment,materials,labor,overhead,and the profit for the ; 4 e-, it _ atr work indicated on this application. Valuation: $ 2-(11'7 C, to® 1 and 2-family dwelling ❑Commercial/industrial ; Number of bedrooms: ❑Accessory building 0 Multi-family Number of bathrooms: ❑Master builder 0 Other: To number of floors 1 � k.4��� t'',.:- ,. ,14. -•-• ,,..0 � New dwelling area: i�� square feet Job site address:14575 SW 81st Avenue City/State/ZIP:Tigard,OR 97224 Garage/carport area: square feet � p Suite/bldg./apt.no.: I Projectname: S'r Covered porch area: square feet Cross street/directions to job site:Closest intersection is Bonita Road Deck area: square feet and 81"Avenue. Turn from Bonita onto 81"Avenue. House is the Other structure area: square feet third house on the right. ! i ' ; €' ` !- Subdivision: I Lot no.: Permit fees*are based on the value of the work performed. Indicate the value(rounded to the nearest dollar)of all Tax map/parcel no.: equipment,materials,labor,overhead,and the profit for the ‘,` >� x ;k`-'1i,`„"<)'4-11''':„_@`_p t 4 '�;: work indicated on this application. n •- • /,.t,�l n I v u y v\i G1s �•?kiA,i " )e) '2.17-0 Valuation: $ (% Existing building area: square feet Of 7,002- p f,or tt) V.S OVA('In) -ilv. �Ou a✓ New building area: square feet - ��� ' v Number of stories: < de A® �t,^ ,s $ �, mak . Name:Mark&Madae Fast Type of construction: Address:14592 SW 81st Avenue Occupancy groups: City/State/ZIP:Tigard,OR 97224 Existing: Phone:(503)598-1166 Fax ( ) New: g Business name: Structural plan review fee(or deposit): Contact name: i(;i a U-t„.„ r:,}-- FLS plan review fee(if applicable): Address: 1t4 SCI 2. SN &I ` /1.1,4---/! " Total fees due upon application: di City/State/ZIP: \i�(y ( Amount received Phone:(-y,.`"4)) `.> Ti--l ui.. I Fax::( ) ', e 3. e - t r z E-mail: I it\h�i ` > � (xL t, Commercial and residential prescriptive installation of r•te` ems: � �h � � � '','.* "` s b :(.1'4i* � ,e 3 roof-top mounted Photovoltaic Solar Panel System. Submit two(2)sets of roof plan with connection details Business name: 6)A/we(' and fire department access,along with the 2010 Oregon Address: Solar Installation Specialty Code checklist. Permit Fee(includes plan review $180.00 City/State/ZIP: and administrative fees): Phone:( ) I Fax:( ) State surcharge(12%of permit fee): $21.60 CCB lic.: Total fee due upon application: $201.60 (4-0This permit application expires if a permit is not obtained Authorized signature: within 180 days after it has been accepted as complete. Date: vV j *Fee methodology set by Tri-County Building Industry Print name: Hadag„ �� I �'�� Service Board. I:\Building\Permits\BUP-RESPermitApp.doc 02/24/2011 440-4613T(11/02/COM/WEB) . s._ Building Permit Application Checklist One- and Two-Family Dwelling FOR OFFICE USE ONLI City of Tigard Received IIINPermit No.: al 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 Associated ated Associatt ed Phone: 503.718.2439 Fax: 503.598.1960 '"' ` - I IGARD 24-Hour Inspection Line: 503.639.4175 ❑ Electrical ❑ Plumbing ❑ Mechanical Internet: www.tigard-or.gov 0 Other: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE REQUIRED FOR PLAN REVIEW les No N/A 1 Land use actions completed. See jurisdiction criteria for concurrent reviews. ❑ 0 0 2 Zoning. Flood plain,solar balance points,seismic soils designation,historic district,etc. 0 ❑ 0 3 Verification of approved plat/lot. 0 0 ❑ 4 Fire district approval required. Name of district: , 0 0 0 5 Septic system permit or authorization for remodel. Existing system capacity ❑ CI 6 Sewer permit. ❑ ❑ 0 7 Water district approval. El 0 ❑ 8 Soils'report. Must carry original applicable stamp and signature on file or with application. 0 ❑ 0 9 Erosion control 0 plan 0 permit required. Include drainage-way protection,silt fence design and location of catch- El 0 0 basin protection,etc. 10 3 Complete sets of legible plans. Must be drawn to scale,showing conformance to applicable local and state El ❑ 0 building codes. Lateral design details and connections must be incorporated into the plans or on a separate full-size sheet attached to the plans with cross references between plan location and details. Plan review cannot be completed if copyright violations exist. 11 Site/plot plan drawn to scale. The plan must show lot and building setback dimensions;property corner elevations(if 0 ❑ ❑ there is more than a 4-ft.elevation differential,plan must show contour lines at 2-ft.intervals);location of easements and driveway;footprint of structure(including decks);location of wells/septic systems;utility locations;direction indicator;lot area;building coverage area;percentage of coverage;impervious area;existing structures on site;and surface drainage. 12 Foundation plan. Show dimensions,anchor bolts,any hold-downs and reinforcing pads,connection details,vent size ❑ ❑ 0 and location. 13 Floor plans. Show all dimensions,room identification,window size,location of smoke detectors,water heater, El ❑ ❑ furnace,ventilation fans,plumbing fixtures,balconies and decks 30 inches above grade,etc. 14 Cross section(s)and details. Show all framing-member sizes and spacing such as floor beams,headers,joists,sub- El ❑ El floor,wall construction,roof construction. More than one cross section may be required to clearly portray construction. Show details of all wall and roof sheathing,roofing,roof slope,ceiling height,siding material,footings and foundation,stairs,fireplace construction,thermal insulation,etc. 15 Elevation views. Provide elevations for new construction;minimum of two elevations for additions and remodels. El 0 ❑ Exterior elevations must reflect the actual grade if the change in grade is greater than four foot at building envelope. Full-size sheet addendums showing foundation elevations with cross references are acceptable. 16 Wall bracing(prescriptive path)and/or lateral analysis plans. Must indicate details and locations;for non- ❑ ❑ ❑ prescriptive path analysis provide specifications and calculations to engineering standards. 17 Floor/roof framing. Provide plans for all floors/roof assemblies,indicating member sizing,spacing,and bearing El ❑ El locations. Show attic ventilation. 18 Basement and retaining walls. Provide cross sections and details showing placement of rebar. For engineered ❑ El El systems,see item 22,"Engineer's calculations." 19 Beam calculations. Provide two sets of calculations using current code design values for all beams and multiple joists 0 ❑ El over 10 feet long and/or any beam/joist carrying a non-uniform load. 20 Manufactured floor/roof truss design details. El El ❑ 21 Energy Code compliance. Identify the prescriptive path or provide calculations. A gas-piping schematic is required ❑ El ❑ for four or more appliances. 22 Engineer's calculations. When required or provided,(i.e.,shear wall,roof truss)shall be stamped by an engineer or 0 0 ❑ architect licensed in Ore on and shall be shown to be a I'licable to the .ro'ect under review. JURISDICTIONAL SPECIFICS 23 Three(3)site plans are required for Item 11 above. Site plans must be 8-1/2"x 11"or 11"x 17". ❑ ❑ ❑ 24 Two(2)sets each are required for Items 16, 19,20 and 22 above. ❑ El ❑ 25 Building plans shall not contain red lines or tape-ons. "Mirrored"building plans will not be accepted. ❑ ❑ ❑ 26 "Reversed"building plans must meet criteria outlined in the Permit&System Development Fees document. 0 ❑ ❑ 27 "Drawn to scale"indicates standard architect or engineer scale. ❑ ❑ ❑ 28 Site plan to include tree size,type and location per approved project street tree plan(if applicable),and City of Tigard ❑ El 0 Street Tree List. 29 Site plan to include trees and tree protection measures as required by conditions of approval. Tree locations,driplines, ❑ ❑ ❑ and protection measures must be drawn to scale and must include the project arborist's signature of approval. 30 A Clean Water Services'Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment form is required for all building additions, ❑ ❑ ❑ including decks,patio covers(over non-impervious surface)and accessory structures to existing residential dwellings on a lot of record approved prior to September 9, 1995. I:\Building\Permits\BUP-RESPermitApp.doc 02/24/2011 440-4613T(11/02/COM/WEB) Electrical Permit Application FOR OFFICE USE ONLV 1"1- City of Tigard Received Date/B : ( lir; 0 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 Phone: 503.718.2439 L, '( r Plan Review ' Related Permit#: 4 3 i Z U 1 8 Date/B : 2-Z• -1 ® �. Email: TigardBuildingPermits@Tigard-or.govReady Date/By: See Page 2 for T I G A R D Inspection Line: 503.639.4175 Internet:�r i I. age i,�RR + otified/Method: EMI Supplemental Information TE OF WO II � DIVISION .. PLAN REVIEW ❑New construction ❑Addition/alteratiTrep51acemen - ' Please check all that apply(submit 2 sets of plans w/tems checked): ElService or feeder 400 amps or more 0 Building over three stories. El Demolition ❑Other: where the available fault current ❑Marinas and boatyards. CATEGORY OF CONSTRUCTION,:, exceeds 10,000 amps at 150 volts or El Floating buildings. ❑ 1-and 2-family dwelling 0 Commercial/industrial ❑Accessory building less to ground,or exceeds 14,000 ❑Commercial-use agricultural amps for all other installations. buildings. ❑Multi-family 0 Master builder ❑Other: 0 Fire pump. 0 Installation of 150 KVA or <3JOB SITE INFORMATION;AND LOCATIONEmergency system. larger separately derived r � ❑❑Addition of new motor load of system. Job#: Job site address: L�f� fj c\111k lam�- .p,�(-ti 100HP or more. ❑"A","E","1-2",°`l-3", l y C i� 2,2-1 ❑Six or more residential units. occupancy. City/State/ZIP: `t 0 Health-care facilities. 0 Recreational vehicle parks. Suite/bldg./apt.#: J Project name: 1'aS 1--' 0 Hazardous locations. 0SuPpI voltage for more than 0 Service or feeder 600 amps or more. 600 volts nominal. Cross street/directions to job site: '2i°r11 ; ' - 't, 1 (k i S ,YC' 3 FEE SCHEDULE., Description I Qty. I Each I Total I * New residential single-or multi-family dwelling unit. Subdivision: Lot#: Includes attached garage. 1,000 sq.ft.or less 168.54 4 Tax map/parcel#: Ea.add'l 500 sq.ft.or portion 33.92 1 ': .-. :, .. DESCIUPTION OF RK Limited energy,residential ?CV i1 \67411),011--- (with above sq.ft.) 75.00 2 1 V m1-1- NY1) V COlit ik.4,1 (,l/rATI ✓1, `� J Limited energy,multi-family 75.00 2 residential(with above sq.ft.) Renewable Energy 0 See Page 2 iiizii,,, ttf PER a '• R ,, ❑ TENANT Services or feeders installation,alteration,and/or relocation Name: N1 Cu, V..., + 0.0, l9,,. ��- 200 amps or less 100.70 2 Address: S` ,� ' t/ 201 amps to 400 amps 133.56 2 �� 1 401 amps to 600 amps 200.34 2 City/State/ZIP: f} Curti ci 1 2,)yy. 601 amps to 1,000 amps 301.04 2 Phone:(cc-Q7 ) 5 ii-I I u Le Over 1,000 amps or volts 552.26 2 Email: .1.--;A-1, e 7AS T Gm'A`v1 c1 L L Temporary services or feeders installation,alteration,and/or � relocation Owner installation:This installation is being made on property that I own which is not 200 amps or less 59.36 1 intended for sale,le.s-,rent, or exchang -a7ccording to ORS 447,449,670,and 701. 201 amps to 400 amps 125.08 2 Owner signature: J / '1. Date:*2 l)-L` ) ( 401 amps to 599 amps 168.54 2 v.,-- Branch circuits-new,alteration,or extension,per panel❑ PANT sfw ' 0 CONTACT PERSON H A.Fee for branch circuits with Business name: above service or feeder fee, each branch circuit 7.42 2 Contact name: B.Fee for branch circuits without Address: service or feeder fee,first 56.18 2 branch circuit City/State/ZIP: Each add'l branch circuit 7.42 2 Miscellaneous(service or feeder not included) Phone:( ) Each manufactured or modular 67.84 2 dwelling,service and/or feeder Email: Reconnect only 67.84 2 ` CoI+JTRACTbI , '" Pump or irrigation circle 67.84 2 Business name: Sign or outline lighting 67.84 2 Signal circuit(s)or limited-energy Address: panel,alteration,or extension. ❑ See Page 2 2 City/State/ZIP: Each additional inspection over allowable in any of the above Additional inspection(1 hr min) 66.25/hr Phone:( ) Investigation(1 hr min) 90.00/hr Email: Industrial plant(1 hr min) 78.18/hr Inspections for which no fee is / q G"� CCB Lic.: Electrical Lic.: Suprv.Lic.: specifically listed('h hr min) 90.00/hr /�l'- ,y.. `'E .ECTR1CAL PERMIT FEES , Suprv.Electrician signature,required: Subtotal: Print name: Date: 0 Plan Review Required(25%of permit fee): -'---- State surcharge(12%of permit fee): 1),, Authorized signature: TOTAL PERMIT FEE: �Lt� This permit application expires if a permit is not obtained within 180 Print name: Date: days after it has been accepted as complete. * Number of inspections allowed per permit. I:\Building\Permits\ELC_PermitAppELR_ERE.doc Rev 10/26/2017 440-4615T(11/05/COM/WEB Electrical Permit Application—City of Tigard Page 2—Supplemental Information Limited Energy Permit Fees: Renewable Energy Permit Fees: RESJIWNTIAL WORK ONLY „ p FEE SDULE Fee for all residential systems combined: $75.00 Description Qtr. I Each I Totali * y Renewable electrical energy systems: Check Type of Work Involved: 5 kva or less 100.70 2 5.01 to 15 kva 133.56 2 ❑ Audio and Stereo Systems* 15.01 to 25 kva 200.34 2 Wind generation systems in excess of 25 kva: ❑ Burglar Alarm 25.01 to 50 kva 301.04 2 50.01 to 100 kva 552.26 2 ❑ Garage Door Opener* >100 kva(fee in accordance with OAR 918-309-0040) 552.26 2 ❑ Heating,Ventilation and Air Conditioning Solar generation systems in excess of 25 kva: System* Each additional kva over 25 7.42 3 ❑ Vacuum Systems* >100 kva—no additional charge 0.0 3 Each additional inspection over allowable in any of the above: ❑ Other Each additional inspection is 66.25/hr 1 charged at an hourly(1 hr min) Inspections for which no fee is 90.00/hr specifically listed('/z hr min) 'COMMERCIAL WCI ONLY: = ELECTRI AL PE i r :FEES, r Subtotal Enteron Page 1): Fee for each commercial system: $75.00 3' * Number of inspections allowed per permit. (SEE OAR 918-309-0000) Check Type of Work Involved: ❑ Audio and Stereo Systems ❑ Boiler Controls ❑ Clock Systems ❑ Data Telecommunication Installation ❑ Fire Alarm Installation ❑ HVAC ❑ Instrumentation ❑ Intercom and Paging Systems ❑ Landscape Irrigation Control* ❑ Medical ❑ Nurse Calls ❑ Outdoor Landscape Lighting* ❑ Protective Signaling ❑ Other: Total number of commercial systems: *No licenses are required. Licenses are required for all other installations I:\Building\Permits\ELC_PermitApp_ELR_ERE.doc Rev 10/26/2017 • Property Owner Statement Regarding Construction Responsibilities Oregon Law requires residential construction permit applicants who are not licensed with the Construction Contractors Board to sign the following statement before a building permit can be issued. (ORS 701.325 (2)) This statement is required for residential building, electrical, mechanical, and plumbing permits. Licensed architect and engineer applicants,exempt from licensing under ORS 701.010(7), need not submit this statement.This statement will be filed with the permit. Please check the appropriate box: I own, reside in, or will reside in the completed structure and my general contractor is: Name CCB# Expiration Date I will inform my general contractor that all subcontractors who work on the structure must be licensed with the Construction Contractors Board. or I will be performing work on property I own, a residence that I reside in, or a residence that I will reside in. If I hire subcontractors, I will hire only subcontractors licensed with the Construction Contractors Board. If I change my mind and hire a general contractor, I will select a contractor who is licensed with the CCB and will immediately give the name of the contractor to the office issuing this Building Permit. I have read and understand the Information Notice to Homeowners About Construction Responsibilities, and I hereby certify that the information on this homeowner statement is true and accurate. Print Name of Permit Applicant jalia-CLU ,3` Signature of Permit Applicant Date Permit#: /h 5 / 7'1 Address: 11/5 75" _1.1/tf Issued by: is Date: Wir _ �1' This Copy for Permit Offices City of Tigard IN IIII 'I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT T 1 c A x o Building Permit Review — Residential ,k, Building Permit #: el 57-Air_ 7 Site Address: II S C 3a gli. vt- Project Name: I--a, A-61 } ;c.'\ Lot #: (New dwelling=subdivision name;Addition or Alteration=last name of owner) Planning Review Proposal: Alkv, 44 1�� t-Jre,:4., +kJ- k I 1;" 1-, ,, ZOO' er SCO? r-Nr -o (,J(rtv)- E Verify site address/suite# exists and activ/e in permit system. River Terrace Neighborhood: i No ❑ Yes,See River Terrace Review Addendum Attached Sit Ian Elements: e(3)copies of site plan LJ'xisting structures on site ite plan must be on 8-1/2"x 11"or 11 x 17"paper Crid''ootprint of new structure(including decks)with finished g1awn to scale(standard architect or engineer scale) ,floor elevations rth arrow tility locations&easements(required for new and additions) ITA`, e address,project or subdivision name and lot numberI:Sidewalk/driveway approach A/Applicant information(name and phone number) 0i,ocation of wells/septic systems LA Lot dimensions and building setback dimensions Existing trees to be retained with drip line,and tree Lthsquare footage of buildings to be demolished A protection measures aot area,building coverage area,percentage of coverage and lin,street tree size,type and location impervious area(applicable if R-7,R-12,R-25&R-40) Il Street names !Property corner elevations(2 foot contour lines if more than >1,000 sf of impervious area created or replaced? ❑Yes o U./Clean differential) If yes,is a storm water quality facility shown? ❑YWs No Lam./Clean Water Services—Service Provider Letter(lot platted prior to 9/10/1995): /Required: El Yes,applicant was notified "No Received: ❑ Yes ❑ No le Public Facilities Improvement(PFI) Permit: equired: ❑ Yes,applicantotified l;d No Applied For: ❑ Yes ❑ No,stop intake and Use Case#: ii IV Zoning: R1•S EV Required Setbacks: Front 2,43 Rear (S Side c- Street Side ),JA- Garage 24% [ J ndscape Requirement: f/4 % Q/tot Coverage Maximum: IA. % lLl Building Height: Maximum Height 3 S Actual Height _C7=,.i ; j � Lid /Visual Clearance R �� Sensitive Lands: ❑ Yes " No Type lIa-) Urban Forestry Plan liA4Conditions "Met"prior to issuance of building permit9 _ 11 ! Notes: 34471,1 0 ,,,,„,1- v,(_j '1. fr; ,- lv 44 ala{111N. 1.6'1 14 -Sa7, Aj FFA ;� .mac- ISP,L1 d, (,k �,in.,I. ,,�Ay II j L L�„ 1L. y L r.,tv k! Iti GIN+' h.i,$ r,.i J !�✓,,,„;-,k,T ll1,, ivl- Ur7 1,`*'T,t ivphi- y } v.,.Qui +8 "r!� '-'i1A i/y J i Approved By Planning: Date: Z-2I--1,/ Revisions (after Building Submittal only) Reviewer Date Revision 1: ❑ Approved ❑ Not Approved Revision 2: ❑ Approved ❑ Not Approved Revision 3: ❑ Approved ❑ Not Approved I:\Building\Forms\BldgPemiitRvw_RES_061417.docx Building Permit Submittal Original Submittal Date: _2/ i/ r Site Plans: # 7 Building Plans: # Building Permit#: C ' nter building permit#above. Workflow Routing: C'�P anni g El Engineering ❑ Permit Coordinator ❑ Building Workflow Sign-off: I off for Planning(include notes from planning review) Route Application Documents: 11.0..? lgineering: (1) copy of permit application, (1) site plan, (1) building plan and ,� ori al plan review routing form. L�Building: original permit application,site plans,building plans,engineer and beam calculations and trust details,if applicable,etc. Notes: By Permit Technician: Date: 6„ !k Y Engineering Review Slope at building pad: t\i/Ps ❑ Conditions "Met"prior to issuance of building permit El Easements (encroachments)per engineering conditions of approval and plat Water Quality/Quantity Facility: Assess Water Quality Fee in-lieu: El Yes Z/No Assess Water Quantity Fee in-lieu: El Yes No LIDA Facility on lot: ❑ Yes Flf No Cr Final Plat Recorded: ❑ NOT Approved by Engineering: Date: Notes: El Approved by Engineering: tv1,1, ✓ Date: 2— Z 2– 18 Revisions (after Building Submittal only) Reviewer Date Revision 1: ❑ Approved ❑ Not Approved Revision 2: Cl Approved El Not Approved Revision 3: ❑ Approved ❑ Not Approved Permit Coordinator Review Conditions "Met"prior to issuance of building permit ❑ Approved,NOT Released: Date: Notes: Revisions (after Building Submittal only) Revision Notice 1: Date Sent to Applicant: Revision Notice 2: Date Sent to Applicant: Revision Notice 3: Date Sent to Applicant: (SDC Fees Entered: Wash Co Trans Dev Tax: El Yes X N/A Tigard Trans SDC: ❑ Yes N/A Parks SDC: Cl Yes N/A LIDA El Yes *N/A XC OK to Issue Permit Approved by Permit Coordinator: Xr4U Date: 2_.\/:21N I:\Building\Forms\BldgPermitRvw_RES_010118.docx Tom Hochstatter From: Mark VanDomelen Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 10:10 AM To: #Building Subject: FW: porches on new homes FYI.This would apply to porch covers also. From: Larson, Suzanne [mailto:sularson@co.linn.or.us] Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 9:53 AM To: Rebai Tamerhoulet; Caufield, Scott; Hank McDonald; Ted Zuk; Daryl Jones; 'Chris Ragland'; Whitehill, Terry; Vandagriff, Samantha; Aaron Yuma ; Alan Clair Co.; Bob Cunningham; Bob Gilmore; Bob Mitchell; Brett Cook; Brian Don; Brian Smith; Carrie Lopez; Chet Singleton; Chris Gracia; Chuck Woolsey ; Claude Kennedy; Dale Bohannan; Dan Carlson; Dave Flemings; BOWLSBY David; David Kloss; David Mortier; Diane Tuski; Djohnson@ci.LaCenter.wa.us; Don Sallee; Elizabeth Bunga; Eric Schmidt; Gary Biggs; Gary Bood ; Greg Seger; Jack Applegate ; Piercy,Janell; Jay Winchester; Jeff Kennedy; Jeremy Payne (paynej@ashland.or.us); Jim Beyerly; Jim Clark; Jim Muir; Jim Perry; jlayman@ci.washougal.wa.us; John Bernards; John Corliss; John Lindstrom; Joseph McClay; Ham, Karl; Ken Sandlin; Larry Ellenwood ; Laura Lee Snook; Leonard Brogden; Mark Burrows ; Mark Ennis; Mark Krenz; Mark VanDomelen; Mark VanVost; Melanie Adams (Melanie.Adams@hillsboro-oregon.gov); Michael Morter(michael.h.morter@oregon.gov); Mike Gieszler; Mike Remesnik; Mike Smith; Takara, Nate; Norman Nomie; Pat Debenedetti ; Randy Scheid ; Carlson, Richard; Rick Mead; Robert Johnston; Robert Rice (Robert@thebldgdept.com); ronald.p.dettrich@co.benton.or.us; Scott Linfesty, work; Scott McKie; Shawn Eaton; Sree Thirunagari; Steve Forster; Steve Krieg; MCGUIRE Steve W(PW); Steve Winstead; Ted Cuno; Terre Gift(tgift@ci.sandy.or.us); Todd Cunningham ; Troy Wheeler; Warren Jackson; Brad Roast Cc: Nancy Keogan Subject: RE: porches on new homes Thought you might be interested in this from BCD: This is a great question, and one that we have answered in the past. I've also included some additional related information from previous responses that may be helpful, below. Questions: 1. Is the patio cover in question exempt from plan review and inspection if it is: a. Integral to the roof structure of the dwelling (i.e. cant'd trusses) b. Not integral to the roof structure of the dwelling 2. Is exempt work included in the valuation? 3. Does construction "timing" affect work that is exempt from permit? Answers: 1. See (a) and (b) below: a. No. If the roof structure of the patio cover(s) in question is integral to the roof structure of the regulated dwelling, it is subject to plan review and inspection accordingly, to the extent that it affects the regulated elements of the structure. If the customer does not wish for any part of the exempt portion of construction be reviewed or inspected, they would need to demonstrate that it is not integral to any element of the regulated construction. b. Yes 2. No, a jurisdiction cannot collect fees for work that is exempt. The exemption from permit exempts associated valuation and fees. 1 3. No, there are not "timing" requirements specified under R105.2. The exemption can apply whether it is a new construction site, or an existing dwelling. I hope this information is helpful to you. Our Chief Building Official, Structural Chief and Program Engineer are copied above for consistent communication purposes. As always, please feel free to follow up if you have any additional questions. Thanks. Tony Tony Rocco Sr. Building Code Specialist Oregon Building Codes Division 503.373.7529 anthony.j.rocco(Zi oregon.gov www.oregon.gov/bcd "Working with Oregonians to ensure safe building construction while supporting a positive business climate." From: Rebai Tamerhoulet [mailto:RTamerhoulet@cityofsalem.net] Sent:Thursday, November 9, 2017 2:02 PM To: Caufield, Scott; Hank McDonald; Ted Zuk; Daryl Jones; 'Chris Ragland'; Whitehill,Terry; Vandagriff, Samantha; Aaron Yuma ; Alan Clair Co.; Bob Cunningham; Bob Gilmore; Bob Mitchell; Brett Cook; Brian Don; Brian Smith; Carrie Lopez; Chet Singleton; Chris Gracia; Chuck Woolsey ; Claude Kennedy; Dale Bohannan; Dan Carlson; Dave Flemings; BOWLSBY David; David Kloss; David Mortier; Diane Tuski; Djohnson@ci.LaCenter.wa.us; Don Sallee; Elizabeth Bunga; Eric Schmidt; Gary Biggs; Gary Bood ; Greg Seger ; Jack Applegate ; Piercy, Janell; Jay Winchester; Jeff Kennedy; Jeremy Payne (paynej@ashland.or.us); Jim Beyerly; Jim Clark; Jim Muir; Jim Perry; ilavman@ci.washougal.wa.us; John Bernards; John Corliss; John Lindstrom; Joseph McClay; Ham, Karl; Ken Sandlin; Larry Ellenwood ; Laura Lee Snook; Leonard Brogden; Mark Burrows ; Mark Ennis; Mark Krenz; Mark Van Domelen; Mark VanVost; Melanie Adams(Melanie.Adams@hillsboro- oregon.gov); Michael Molter(michael.h.morter@oregon.gov); Mike Gieszler; Mike Remesnik; Mike Smith; Takara, Nate; Norman Nomie; Pat Debenedetti ; Randy Scheid ; Carlson, Richard; Rick Mead; Robert Johnston; Robert Rice (Robert@thebldgdept.com); ronald.p.dettrich@co.benton.or.us; Scott Linfesty, work; Scott McKie; Shawn Eaton; Sree Thirunagari; Steve Forster; Steve Krieg; MCGUIRE Steve W (PW); Steve Winstead; Larson, Suzanne;Ted Cuno; Terre Gift (tgift@ci.sandy.or.us); Todd Cunningham ; Troy Wheeler; Warren Jackson; Brad Roast Cc: Nancy Keogan Subject: RE: porches on new homes Hello Salem follows the same process as Clackamas County. THanks From:Caufield,Scott[mailto:scottcau@co.clackamas.or.us] Sent:Thursday, November 09,2017 12:53 PM To: Hank McDonald<Hank McDonaldC@co.washington.or.us>;Ted Zuk<ZukT1@jacksoncounty.org>; Daryl Jones <DJones@Silverton.or.us>; 'Chris Ragland' <cragland@tualatin.gov>;Whitehill,Terry <Terry.Whitehill@portlandoregon.gov>;Vandagriff,Samantha<VandagriffS@milwaukieoregon.gov>; Aaron Yuma <Aaron.Yuma@ci.redmond.or.us>;Alan Clair Co.<aclair@claircompany.com>; Bob Cunningham <bcunningham@ci.camas.wa.us>; Bob Gilmore<bgilmore@ci.oswego.or.us>; Bob Mitchell 2 3. No, there are not "timing" requirements specified under R105.2. The exemption can apply whether it is a new construction site, or an existing dwelling. I hope this information is helpful to you. Our Chief Building Official, Structural Chief and Program Engineer are copied above for consistent communication purposes. As always, please feel free to follow up if you have any additional questions. Thanks. Tony Tony Rocco Sr. Building Code Specialist Oregon Building Codes Division 503.373.7529 anthony.i.rocco(cuoregon.gov www.oregon.gov/bcd "Working with Oregonians to ensure safe building construction while supporting a positive business climate." From: Rebai Tamerhoulet [mailto:RTamerhoulet@cityofsalem.net] Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 2:02 PM To: Caufield, Scott; Hank McDonald; Ted Zuk; Daryl Jones; 'Chris Ragland'; Whitehill,Terry; Vandagriff, Samantha; Aaron Yuma ; Alan Clair Co.; Bob Cunningham; Bob Gilmore; Bob Mitchell; Brett Cook; Brian Don; Brian Smith; Carrie Lopez; Chet Singleton; Chris Gracia; Chuck Woolsey ; Claude Kennedy; Dale Bohannan; Dan Carlson; Dave Flemings; BOWLSBY David; David Klass; David Mortier; Diane Tuski; Diohnson@ci.LaCenter.wa.us; Don Sallee; Elizabeth Bunga; Eric Schmidt; Gary Biggs; Gary Bood ; Greg Seger ; Jack Applegate ; Piercy, Janell; Jay Winchester; Jeff Kennedy; Jeremy Payne (pavnei@ashland.or.us); Jim Beyerly; Jim Clark; Jim Muir; Jim Perry;jlavman©ci.washougal.wa.us; John Bernards; John Corliss; John Lindstrom; Joseph McClay; Ham, Karl; Ken Sandlin; Larry Ellenwood ; Laura Lee Snook; Leonard Brogden; Mark Burrows ; Mark Ennis; Mark Krenz; Mark Van Domelen; Mark VanVost; Melanie Adams (Melanie.Adams@hillsboro- oregon.gov); Michael Morter(michael.h.morter@oregon.gov); Mike Gieszler; Mike Remesnik; Mike Smith; Takara, Nate; Norman Nomie; Pat Debenedetti ; Randy Scheid ; Carlson, Richard; Rick Mead; Robert Johnston; Robert Rice (Robert@thebldgdeot.com); ronald.p.dettrich©co.benton.or.us; Scott Linfesty, work; Scott McKie; Shawn Eaton; Sree Thirunagari; Steve Forster; Steve Krieg; MCGUIRE Steve W(PW); Steve Winstead; Larson, Suzanne; Ted Cuno; Terre Gift (tgift@ci.sandy.or.us);Todd Cunningham ; Troy Wheeler; Warren Jackson; Brad Roast Cc: Nancy Keogan Subject: RE: porches on new homes Hello Salem follows the same process as Clackamas County. THanks From:Caufield,Scott[mailto:scottcau@co.clackamas.or.us] Sent:Thursday, November 09, 2017 12:53 PM To: Hank McDonald<Hank McDonald@co.washington.or.us>;Ted Zuk<ZukTJ@iacksoncounty.org>; Daryl Jones <DJones@Silverton.or.us>; 'Chris Ragland'<cragland@tualatin.gov>;Whitehill,Terry <Terry.Whitehill@portlandoregon.gov>;Vandagriff,Samantha<VandagriffS@milwaukieoregon.gov>;Aaron Yuma <Aaron.Yuma@ci.redmond.or.us>;Alan Clair Co.<aclair@claircompanv.com>; Bob Cunningham <bcunningham@ci.camas.wa.us>; Bob Gilmore<bgilmore@ci.oswego.or.us>; Bob Mitchell 2 Tom Hochstatter From: Mark VanDomelen Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 10:10 AM To: #Building Subject: FW: porches on new homes FYI.This would apply to porch covers also. From: Larson, Suzanne [mailto:sularson@co.linn.or.us] Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 9:53 AM To: Rebai Tamerhoulet; Caufield, Scott; Hank McDonald;Ted Zuk; Daryl Jones; 'Chris Ragland'; Whitehill,Terry; Vandagriff, Samantha; Aaron Yuma ; Alan Clair Co.; Bob Cunningham; Bob Gilmore; Bob Mitchell; Brett Cook; Brian Don; Brian Smith; Carrie Lopez; Chet Singleton; Chris Gracia; Chuck Woolsey ; Claude Kennedy; Dale Bohannan; Dan Carlson; Dave Flemings; BOWLSBY David; David Kloss; David Mortier; Diane Tuski; Djohnson@ci.LaCenter.wa.us; Don Sallee; Elizabeth Bunga; Eric Schmidt; Gary Biggs; Gary Bood ; Greg Seger ; Jack Applegate ; Piercy,Janell; Jay Winchester; Jeff Kennedy; Jeremy Payne (paynej@ashland.or.us); Jim Beyerly; Jim Clark; Jim Muir; Jim Perry; jlayman@ci.washougal.wa.us; John Bernards; John Corliss; John Lindstrom; Joseph McClay; Ham, Karl; Ken Sandlin; Larry Ellenwood ; Laura Lee Snook; Leonard Brogden; Mark Burrows ; Mark Ennis; Mark Krenz; Mark VanDomelen; Mark VanVost; Melanie Adams (Melanie.Adams@hillsboro-oregon.gov); Michael Morter(michael.h.morter@oregon.gov); Mike Gieszler; Mike Remesnik; Mike Smith;Takara, Nate; Norman Nomie; Pat Debenedetti ; Randy Scheid ; Carlson, Richard; Rick Mead; Robert Johnston; Robert Rice (Robert@thebldgdept.com); ronald.p.dettrich@co.benton.or.us; Scott Linfesty, work; Scott McKie; Shawn Eaton; Sree Thirunagari; Steve Forster; Steve Krieg; MCGUIRE Steve W(PW); Steve Winstead; Ted Cuno; Terre Gift(tgift@ci.sandy.or.us); Todd Cunningham ; Troy Wheeler; Warren Jackson; Brad Roast Cc: Nancy Keogan Subject: RE: porches on new homes Thought you might be interested in this from BCD: This is a great question, and one that we have answered in the past. I've also included some additional related information from previous responses that may be helpful, below. Questions: 1. Is the patio cover in question exempt from plan review and inspection if it is: a. Integral to the roof structure of the dwelling (i.e. cant'd trusses) b. Not integral to the roof structure of the dwelling 2. Is exempt work included in the valuation? 3. Does construction "timing" affect work that is exempt from permit? Answers: 1. See (a) and (b) below: a. No. If the roof structure of the patio cover(s) in question is integral to the roof structure of the regulated dwelling, it is subject to plan review and inspection accordingly, to the extent that it affects the regulated elements of the structure. If the customer does not wish for any part of the exempt portion of construction be reviewed or inspected, they would need to demonstrate that it is not integral to any element of the regulated construction. b. Yes 2. No, a jurisdiction cannot collect fees for work that is exempt. The exemption from permit exempts associated valuation and fees. 1 <bmitchell@cityofseaside.us>; Brett Cook<brettc@cityofboardman.com>; Brian Don<bdon@cityoflagrande.org>; Brian Smith <buildingofficial@cityofyamhill.com>; Carrie Lopez<carrie.lopez@greshamoregon.gov>; Chet Singleton <chet.singleton@co.jefferson.or.us>; Chris Gracia<Chris.Gracia@deschutes.org>; Chuck Woolsey <cwoolsey@hermiston.or.us>; Claude Kennedy<CKennedy@cityofsalem.net>; Dale Bohannan <dalebohannan@cityofeaglepoint.org>; Dan Carlson<carlson@ci.wilsonville.or.us>; Dave Flemings <dflemings@claircompany.com>; BOWLSBY David<dbowlsby@springfield-or.gov>; David Kloss <japplegate@astoria.or.us>; David Mortier<thebldgdept@thebldgdept.com>; Diane Tuski<dtuski@ci.cornelius.or.us>; Djohnson@ci.LaCenter.wa.us; Don Sallee<Donsallee@ci.scappoose.or.us>; Elizabeth Bunga <ebunga@ci.oswego.or.us>; Eric Schmidt<eric.schmidt@greshamoregon.gov>; Gary Biggs<dundeemelody@comcast.net>; Gary Bood <gbood@bakercity.com>;Greg Seger<gseger@co.klamath.or.us>;Jack Applegate<jack@mortierengineering.com>; Piercy,Janell<Janell.Piercy@portlandoregon.gov>;Jay Winchester<Jay Winchester@co.washington.or.us>;Jeff Kennedy<kennedy.Jeff@ci.independence.or.us>;Jeremy Payne (paynej@ashland.or.us)<paynej@ashland.or.us>;Jim Beyerly<jbyerley@co.clatsop.or.us>;Jim Clark<Jclark@westlinnoregon.gov>;Jim Muir<Jim.Muir@clark.wa.gov>;Jim Perry<Jim.Perry@ci.ridgefield.wa.us>; jlayman@ci.washougal.wa.us;John Bernards<John.bernards@hillsboro- oregon.gov>;John Corliss<john.corliss@corvallisoregon.gov>;John Lindstrom<john.lindstrom@ci.pendleton.or.us>; Joseph McClay<jmcclay@ci.bend.or.us>; Harn, Karl<Karl.Harn@portlandoregon.gov>; Ken Sandlin <ksandlin@grantspassoregon.gov>; Larry Ellenwood<Ibellenw@co.douglas.or.us>; Laura Lee Snook <Isnook@brookings.or.us>; Leonard Brogden<lbrogde@co.tillamook.us>; Mark Burrows<mark bcs@yahoo.com>; Mark Ennis<marke@happyvalleyor.gov>; Mark Krenz<mark.krenz@greshamoregon.gov>; Mark Van Domelen <markv@tigard-or.gov>; Mark VanVost<mark.vanvoast@co.hood-river.or.us>; Melanie Adams (Melanie.Adams@hillsboro-oregon.gov)<Melanie.Adams@hillsboro-oregon.gov>; Michael Morter (michael.h.morter@oregon.gov)<michael.h.morter@oregon.gov>; Mike Gieszler<Mike.gieszler@hillsboro- oregon.gov>; Mike Remesnik<mremesnik@ci.sweet-home.or.us>; Mike Smith<msmith@coosbay.org>;Takara, Nate <Nate.Takara@portlandoregon.gov>; Norman Nomie<Norman.nomie@greshamoregon.gov>; Pat Debenedetti <patd@bds.bz>; Randy Scheid<Randy.Scheid@deschutes.org>; Rebai Tamerhoulet<RTamerhoulet@cityofsalem.net>; Carlson, Richard<richardcar@co.clackamas.or.us>; Rick Mead<rmead@@forestgrove-or.gov>; Robert Johnston <bobj@ci.st-helens.or.us>; Robert Rice(Robert@thebldgdept.com)<Robert@thebldgdept.com>; ronald.p.dettrich@co.benton.or.us;Scott Linfesty,work<Scott.Linfesty@oregon.gov>;Scott McKie <mckies@ci.sherwood.or.us>;Shawn Eaton<shawn@thebldgdept.com>; Sree Thirunagari <Sree.Thirunagari@cityofvancouver.us>;Steve Forster<Stephen.Forster@tvfr.com>; Steve Krieg <steve.krieg@ci.woodburn.or.us>; MCGUIRE Steve W(PW)<Steve.MCGUIRE@co.lane.or.us>;Steve Winstead <codeexpert@msn.com>;Suzanne Larson<sularson@co.linn.or.us>;Ted Cuno<ted.cuno@dallasor.gov>;Terre Gift (tgift@ci.sandy.or.us)<tgift@ci.sandy.or.us>;Todd Cunningham <todd.cunningham@co.columbia.or.us>;Troy Wheeler <TWheeler@co.marion.or.us>; Warren Jackson<wjackson@co.marion.or.us>; Brad Roast <broast@beavertonoregon.gov> Cc: Nancy Keogan<Nancy Keogan@co.washington.or.us> Subject: RE: porches on new homes Hi Hank, We include the square footage for all items that are included under roof and also all decks if they are part a new SFR construction project and we charge accordingly. So,while the porch might be exempt as a stand-alone project,the fact that it is part of a new dwelling makes it a part of the SFR and it should be regulated. Does that porch also serve as the required landing? Likely yes, and so that is reason enough to regulate it. If, however, the permit for the new dwelling were completed and finaled and the porch were built after-the-fact, I would not require the permit. So,to answer your questions, no to question#1,yes to question#2. All the best, Scott D. Caufield 3 Building Codes Administrator Clackamas County Building Codes Division 150 Beavercreek Road Oregon City,OR 97045 Phone-(503)742-4747 Fax—(503)742-4741 scottcau@clackamas.us My schedule is generally Monday through Friday 7:30 am until 4:30 pm. Permitting lobby hours of operation are Monday through Thursday 8:00 am until 4:00 pm and Friday 8:00 am until 3:00 pm. From: Hank McDonald [mailto:Hank McDonald@co.washington.or.us] Sent:Thursday, November 9, 2017 12:40 PM To:Ted Zuk<ZukTJ@jacksoncounty.org>; Daryl Jones<DJones@Silverton.or.us>; 'Chris Ragland' <cragland@tualatin.gov>;Whitehill,Terry<Terry.Whitehill@ portlandoregon.gov>;Vandagriff,Samantha <VandagriffS(Wmilwaukieoregon.gov>;Aaron Yuma<Aaron.Yuma@ci.redmond.or.us>;Alan Clair Co. <aclair@claircompany.com>; Bob Cunningham<bcunningham@ci.camas.wa.us>; Bob Gilmore <bgilmore@ci.oswego.or.us>; Bob Mitchell<bmitchell@cityofseaside.us>; Brett Cook<brettc@cityofboardman.com>; Brian Don<bdon@cityoflagrande.org>; Brian Smith<buildingofficial@cityofyamhill.com>; Carrie Lopez <carrie.lopez@greshamoregon.gov>; Chet Singleton<chet.singletonpco.iefferson.or.us>; Chris Gracia <Chris.Gracia@deschutes.org>; Chuck Woolsey<cwoolsey@hermiston.or.us>; Claude Kennedy <CKennedy@cityofsalem.net>; Dale Bohannan<dalebohannan@cityofeaglepoint.org>; Dan Carlson <Carlson@ci.wilsonville.or.us>; Dave Flemings<dflemings@claircompany.com>; BOWLSBY David <dbowlsby@springfield-or.gov>; David Kloss<japplegate@astoria.or.us>; David Mortier <thebldgdept@thebldgdept.com>; Diane Tuski<dtuski@ci.cornelius.or.us>; Djohnson@ci.LaCenter.wa.us; Don Sallee <Donsallee@ci.scappoose.or.us>; Elizabeth Bunga<ebunga@ci.oswego.or.us>; Eric Schmidt <eric.schmidt@greshamoregon.gov>;Gary Biggs<dundeemelody@comcast.net>; Gary Bood<gbood@bakercity.com>; Greg Seger<gseger@co.klamath.or.us>;Jack Applegate<jack@mortierengineering.com>; Piercy,Janell <Janell.Piercy@portlandoregon.gov>;Jay Winchester<Jay Winchester@co.washington.or.us>;Jeff Kennedy <kennedy.ieff@ci.independence.or.us>;Jeremy Payne (paynei@ashland.or.us)<paynei@ashland.or.us>;Jim Beyerly <jbyerley@co.clatsop.or.us>;Jim Clark<Jclark@westlinnoregon.gov>;Jim Muir<Jim.Muir@clark.wa.gov>;Jim Perry <Jim.Perry@ci.ridgefield.wa.us>; ilayman@ci.washougal.wa.us;John Bernards<John.bernards@hillsboro-oregon.gov>; John Corliss<john.corliss@corvallisoregon.gov>;John Lindstrom<john.lindstrom@ci.pendleton.or.us>;Joseph McClay <jmcclay@ci.bend.or.us>; Harn, Karl<Karl.Harn@portlandoregon.gov>; Ken Sandlin<ksandlin@grantspassoregon.gov>; Larry Ellenwood<Ibellenw@co.douglas.or.us>; Laura Lee Snook<Isnook@brookings.or.us>; Leonard Brogden <lbrogde@co.tillamook.us>; Mark Burrows<mark bcs@yahoo.com>; Mark Ennis<marke@happyvalleyor.gov>; Mark Krenz<mark.krenz@greshamoregon.gov>; Mark Van Domelen<markv@tigard-or.gov>; Mark VanVost <mark.vanvoast@co.hood-river.or.us>; Melanie Adams(Melanie.Adams@hillsboro-oregon.gov) <Melanie.Adams@hillsboro-oregon.gov>; Michael Morter(michael.h.morter@oregon.gov) <michael.h.morter@oregon.gov>; Mike Gieszler<Mike.gieszler@hillsboro-oregon.gov>; Mike Remesnik <mremesnik@ci.sweet-home.or.us>; Mike Smith<msmith@coosbay.org>;Takara, Nate <Nate.Takara@portlandoregon.gov>; Norman Nomie<Norman.nomie@greshamoregon.gov>; Pat Debenedetti <patd@bds.bz>; Randy Scheid<Randy.Scheid@deschutes.org>; Rebai Tamerhoulet<Rtamerhoulet@cityofsalem.net>; Carlson, Richard<richardcar@co.clackamas.or.us>; Rick Mead<rmead@forestgrove-or.gov>; Robert Johnston <bobi@ci.st-helens.or.us>; Robert Rice (Robert@thebldgdept.com)<Robert@thebldgdept.com>; ronald.p.dettrich@co.benton.or.us;Caufield,Scott<scottcau@co.clackamas.or.us>;Scott Linfesty,work <Scott.Linfesty@oregon.gov>;Scott McKie<mckies@ci.sherwood.or.us>; Shawn Eaton<shawn@thebldgdept.com>; Sree Thirunagari<Sree.Thirunagari@cityofvancouver.us>;Steve Forster<Stephen.Forster@tvfr.com>;Steve Krieg <steve.krieg@ci.woodburn.or.us>; MCGUIRE Steve W(PW)<Steve.MCGUIRE@co.lane.or.us>;Steve Winstead <codeexpert@msn.com>;Suzanne Larson<sularson@co.linn.or.us>;Ted Cuno<ted.cuno@dallasor.gov>;Terre Gift (tgift@ci.sandy.or.us)<tgift@ci.sandy.or.us>;Todd Cunningham <todd.cunningham@co.columbia.or.us>;Troy Wheeler <TWheeler@co.marion.or.us>;Warren Jackson<wjackson@co.marion.or.us>; Brad Roast 4 4 <broast@ beaverto noregon.gov> Cc: Nancy Keogan<Nancy Keogan@co.washington.or.us> Subject: porches on new homes Okay, here's an interesting question: Recently we issued a permit for a new home. The initial submittal included a covered front porch. The applicant made the decision to eliminate the front porch and submitted a revision to that effect. Now the applicant has decided to put the covered porch back on. The porch is 180 square feet, and the surface of the walking surface is less than 30 inches above grade. In the exempt work a covered porch less than 200 square feet is clearly listed. So, the question is 1) When determining the valuation for a new home do you remove or not consider the valuation of the covered porch when it is less than 200 square feet? 2) Does the fact that it is a new single family residence and the porch is being constructed as a part of a larger and thereby permitted structure change things? DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules "City General Records Retention Schedule." 5 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Tel: 503.718.2439 Location: Inspection Date: 14575 SW 81ST AVE, TIGARD, OR, 97224 March 8, 2018 at 1 :08:46 PM Record Type: Record ID: Residential - Master Permit MST2018-00072 Inspection Type: Inspector: 299 Final inspection David Young Result: FA I L Comments: Egress window at new bedroom does not meet minimum net clear opening height of 24". Window installed has 19.5" opening height. R310.2.1 Roof rafters installed over new addition not installed per ORSC prescriptive requirements. R802.2,3,3.1 Attic area open to exterior at new addition roof line. No access to floor joist for inspection. Provide structural engineers stamped letter of approval as built or with required fix prior to final inspection approval. Addition built prior without permits and inspection, this inspection for fire, life safety only. Electrical and smoke detectors tested. Cadet heater replaced. Exterior Walls insulated per homeowner, insulation present at cadet heater replacement. Violation Summary: Inspector Contractor City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Tel: 503.718.2439 Location: Inspection Date: 14575 SW 81ST AVE, TIGARD, OR, 97224 March 20, 2018 at 9:12:01 AM Record Type: Record ID: Residential - Master Permit MST2018-00072 Inspection Type: Inspector: 299 Final inspection David Young Result: PASS - NoCofO Comments: Engineering received with corrections. Corrections complete per stamped engineers fix. Smoke detectors installed. Final for bedroom addition ok. Violation Summary: Inspector Contractor