Loading...
City Council Packet - 03/06/2018 1111 City of Tigard Tigard Business Meeting—Agenda TIGARD TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE AND TIME: March 6, 2018 - 6:30 p.m. Business Meeting MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard -Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Citizen Communication items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager. Times noted are estimated;it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda items can be heard in any order after 7:30 p.m. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 503-718-2419, (voice) or 503-684-2772 (IUD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers,it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-718-2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). SEE ATTACHED AGENDA VIEW LIVE VIDEO STREAMING ONLINE: http://live.tigard-or.gov CABLE VIEWERS: The regular City Council meeting is shown live on Channel 28 at 7:30 p.m. The meeting will be rebroadcast at the following times on Channel 28: Thursday 6:00 p.m. Sunday 11:00 a.m. Friday 10:00 p.m. Monday 6:00 a.m. City of.Tigard E A�o Tigard Business Meeting—Agenda TTIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE AND TIME: March 6,2018 - 6:30 p.m. Business Meeting MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard-Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 6:30 PM 1. BUSINESS MEETING A. Call to Order B. Roll Call C. Pledge of Allegiance D. Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 2. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION (Two Minutes or Less, Please) A. Follow-up to Previous Citizen Communication B. Citizen Communication—Sign Up Sheet 3. CONSENT AGENDA: (Tigard City Council) These items are considered routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: A. APPROVE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: •December 5, 2017 •December 19,2017 •Consent Agenda-Items Removed for Separate Discussion:Any items requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion will be considered immediately after the Council/City Center Development Agency has voted on those items which do not need discussion. 4. APPOINTMENT OF TOWN CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION MEMBER 6:30 p.m. estimated time 5. JOINT MEETING WITH THE TOWN CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION 6:35 p.m. estimated time 6. CONSIDER SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE CODE AMENDMENTS 7:10 p.m. estimated time 7. NON AGENDA ITEMS 8. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive Session is called to order,the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute.All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 9. ADJOURNMENT 7:35 p.m. estimated time AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 B - CITIZEN COMMUNICATION DATE: March 6, 2018 (Limited to 2 minutes or less,please) The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda and items on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony becomes part of the public record. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. NAME,ADDRESS & PHONE TOPIC STAFF Please Print CONTACTED Name: Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: J Address 0/00,1:5).614 City • State Zip ' Phone No. Name: Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Address City State Zip Phone No. Name: Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Address City State Zip Phone No. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION 1:\ADM\CITY RECORDERS\000 City Recorder-Records Resources and Policies\CCSignup\2018\citizen communication 180306.doc AIS-3445 3. A. Business Meeting One Meeting Date: 03/06/2018 Length (in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: Approve City Council Meeting Minutes Submitted By: Kelly Burgoyne, Central Services Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Consent Agenda Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Approve City Council meeting minutes. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Approve minutes as submitted. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached council minutes are submitted for City Council approval: •December 5, 2017 •December 19, 2017 OTHER ALTERNATIVES N/A COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS N/A DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION N/A Attachments December 5,2017 Minutes December 19,2017 Minutes City of Tigard Tigard City Council/ICDA Meeting Minutes TIGARD December 5, 2017 E 1. BUSINESS MEETING A. At 6:30 p.m. Mayor Cook called the City Council and Town Center Development Agency meeting to order. B. Mayor Cook asked City Recorder Krager to call the roll. Present Absent Council President Snider ✓ Councilor Woodard ✓ Councilor Anderson ✓ Mayor Cook ✓ Councilor Goodhouse ✓ C. Mayor Cook asked everyone to stand and join him in the Pledge of Allegiance. D. Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items—City Manager Wine said Streets and Transportation Projects Engineer McCarthy will give an update on a CIP project at the end of the meeting. 2. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION A. Follow-up to Previous Citizen Communication—City Manager Wine reported that in response to neighbors' concerns about a development near 121St Avenue, Community Development staff have met with them. The neighbors requested that a walking path be built rather than a cut-through road to the cul-de-sacs. She said nothing has been submitted yet. There will be a subdivision but few detail are available. A neighborhood meeting will be called as part of the pre-application process. This is a Type II matter so it will not come before council. She will keep council members apprised. Mayor Cook said he drove past the areas neighbors indicated on maps provided by the neighbors noted that some of the testimony compared apples to oranges as one was a private lane and the other a public street. B. Citizen Communication—Sign-up Sheet. Michael Brewin, 10250 SW Morgen Court,Tigard, OR 97223, said it is imperative that the level and standard of service the city provides to the community is upheld. A Band-Aid approach will not keep the same standards that people have enjoyed for decades and have TIGARD CITY COUNCIL/TCDA MINUTES — December 5, 2017 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov Page 1 of 11 come to expect. He read the Tigard Times article regarding the city's budgetary concerns and discussed it with friends and although he is opposed to increased taxes,his property will not be worth the same if the city lets the quality of services decrease. The quality of life will be lowered. He said so the current level of code standards, services and staff, specifically in the police department,permit enforcement and inspections, streets and sidewalks, streetlights,public parks and trails and sewer systems can be maintained,he recommended a levy range of.30-.35 cents per$1000,ten-year,renewable,with a two percent annual increase. This could be combined with rising fees and proactively issuing more tickets in all zones and for items blocking streets and sidewalks. This would make it viable without reducing staff and having to change things in the code. He suggested this was a good way to sell it to the people of Tigard. Robert Van Vlack, 15585 SW 109th Avenue,Tigard, OR 97224,addressed the council's recent decision to approve the statement of unity resolution. He thanked Councilor Woodard for addressing his concerns about the resolution. He said he wholeheartedly agreed with him and there are many others in the community sharing the concerns. He said with the approval of the resolution the Tigard Times has affirmed Tigard as a sanctuary city. His close friends and neighbors want to know why they had no voice in this decision and now feel that the door is open for those violating immigration laws to come to a safe refuge. He said he personally was not concerned about decent hardworking people seeking a better life for their families,but rather,those in the shadow a sanctuary city creates to hide while doing their criminal acts. He said most states are keeping illegal immigration and crime statistics and costs to taxpayers buried to suit a political agenda. He said giving a voice to those who oppose federal immigration laws has created an atmosphere of fear for those who respect the rule of law. 3. CONSENT AGENDA: (Tigard City Council and Town Center Development Agency) — A. CONSIDER AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN AN IGA WITH TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY (TCDA) FOR THE PROVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES B. CONSIDER AUTHORIZING THE TCDA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO SIGN AN IGA WITH THE CITY OF TIGARD FOR THE PROVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES C. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION 17-46 TO FORM A HOUSING OPTIONS TASK FORCE Resolution No. 17-46—A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A HOUSING OPTIONS TASK FORCE TO ADVISE STAFF DEVELOPING POLICY AMENDMENTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ALLOW A WIDER VARIETY OF HOUSING TYPES IN TIGARD TIGARD CITY COUNCIL/TCDA MINUTES December 5, 2017 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov Page 2 of 11 Councilor Woodard requested that Consent Items A and B be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion. Councilor Goodhouse moved to approve Consent Agenda Item C. Council President Snider seconded the motion and the motion passed unanimously. Yes No Council President Snider ✓ Councilor Woodard ✓ Councilor Anderson ✓ Mayor Cook ✓ Councilor Goodhouse ✓ Councilor Woodard discussed his concerns with Consent Agenda Items A and B. He said he did not have a problem with reimbursement of soft costs but wanted a discussion on prioritization. Council President Snider asked if his concerns were about governance and oversight and Councilor Woodard asked what oversight, as used in the documents,means. He said as a citizen he is concerned about the taxes. He wants to make sure the $200 million invested in Tigard is tracking right. Councilor Woodard discussed his concerns with Consent Agenda Items A and B. He said there is an undetermined budget and felt the scope had changed. He commented on staffing resources and noted that the economic development manager left for another job. He mentioned a previous discussion back when Councilor Henderson was on the council regarding changing the composition of the development agency board to get some additional skill sets on it. He said he did not have a problem with reimbursement of administrative support or other soft costs but wanted a discussion on prioritization and how the City is doing the business of economic development. Council President Snider asked if his concerns were about governance, oversight and who is on the board? Councilor Woodard agreed those were his concerns and also the taxes and making sure the $200 million invested in Tigard is on the right track. Redevelopment Project Manager Farrelly said the IGAs cover housekeeping items and make explicit the relationship that already exists. The city and agency are two distinct entities under state law and the only IGA that exists now is about the city loaning money to the agency and the agency repaying that money. The city attorney thought it a good idea to be more explicit about each entity's responsibilities. The city hires staff and provides budgeting and city attorney services. The agency can reimburse for those costs. Other things were added such as loan repayment terms and insurance. It formalizes an existing relationship. The budget still gets adopted every year and decisions about loaning the agency money or reimbursing the city for staff time are made in Budget Committee process. City Attorney Rihala said Councilor Woodard's concerns are one step ahead of these IGAs. These establish the relationship of the two separate entities. The substantive questions he raised are down the road once this is clarified. Council President Snider asked if it would be fair to say this should have been done when the agency was established and City Attorney Rihala replied, "Absolutely. This is really for the legal protection of the agencies." TIGARD CITY COUNCIL/TCDA MINUTES — December 5, 2017 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov Page 3 of 11 City Manager Wine added that there is an existing IGA that is solely about the loan between the two agencies. She said there will be a broader conversation about the items such as staffing, work, and plans for the two urban renewal areas during the budget process. Mayor Cook pointed out that as TCDA Executive Director she cannot spend outside the budget created for the agency. Ms. Wine agreed and said as part of the TCDA budget process a program plan for the agency based on the increment that has been generated. She responded to Councilor Woodard's comments about staffing and said Mr. Farrelly had been hired when there was only one urban renewal agency and now that the Tigard Triangle area has been added there will likely be a staffing resource for the Triangle. She commented about the budget situation and said this agreement makes it possible for staff support to come from a source other than the general fund. Councilor Woodard said he never had an issue with the loans but asked why reimbursement is being sought now for staff,work space and supplies. He said he is concerned with city efficiency and would like a discussion on each of the provisions. Council President Snider asked if he would be prepared to act on the IGAs in one or two weeks. Councilor Woodard indicated that would give him enough time to compare agreements. Council President Snider made a motion to move both topics to the January 2 council meeting. Councilor Woodard seconded the motion. Mayor Cook conducted a vote and the motion passed unanimously. Yes No Council President Snider ✓ Councilor Woodard ✓ Councilor Anderson ✓ Mayor Cook ✓ Councilor Goodhouse ✓ 4. APPOINTMENT OF BUDGET COMMITTEE MEMBERS Finance and Information Services Director LaFrance gave the staff report. He said there are three voting positions on the Budget Committee. Mayor Cook and Council President Snider,as the Appointments Advisory Committee,interviewed 14 citizen candidates and recommend appointing Clifford Rone and Timothy Cadman to three-year terms and Liz Newton to a two-year term. Chris Bence was recommended as an alternate member. Council President Snider moved to approve Resolution No. 17-47 and Councilor Goodhouse seconded the motion. City Recorder Krager read the number and title of the resolution and Mayor Cook conducted a vote. The motion passed unanimously. Resolution No. 17-47—A RESOLUTION APPOINTING CLIFFORD RONE, TIMOTHY CADMAN AND LIZ NEWTON TO THE BUDGET COMMITTEE AND APPOINTING CHRIS BENCE AS AN ALTERNATE MEMBER TIGARD CITY COUNCIL/TCDA MINUTES — December 5, 2017 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov Page 4 of 11 Yes No Council President Snider, V Councilor Woodard ✓ Councilor Anderson ✓ Mayor Cook ✓ Councilor Goodhouse ✓ 5. APPOINTMENT OF AUDIT COMMITTEE MEMBERS Finance and Information Services Director LaFrance said on November 30,2017,Mayor Cook and Council President Snider interviewed candidates and selected Jeremy Nichols for a voting position and Ann McElligott as an alternate member. . Councilor Anderson moved for approval of Resolution No. 17-48 and Councilor Goodhouse seconded the motion. City Recorder Krager read the number and title of the resolution. Mayor Cook conducted a vote and the motion passed unanimously. Resolution No. 17-48—A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON APPOINTING JEREMY NICHOLS AS A VOTING MEMBER TO THE AUDIT COMMITTEE AND ANN McELLIGOTT AS AN A ALTERNATE ON THE AUDIT COMMITTEE Yes No Council President Snider ✓ Councilor Woodard ✓ Councilor Anderson ✓ Mayor Cook V Councilor Goodhouse ✓ 6. LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF PARKING AMENDMENT ORDINANCE,MASTER FEES AND CHARGES RESOLUTION AND ABANDONED VEHICLE ORDINANCE UPDATE A. Mayor Cook opened the public hearing. B. Mayor Cook announced the hearing procedures. C. Senior Transportation Planner Brown gave the staff report and PowerPoint presentation, joined by Community Service Officer Hellstrom. He said there has been an increase in parking demand in the downtown in the past year.The Atwell-off-Main housing added an influx of new residents. There are dog park user and TriMet Park and Ride lot spillover cars parking on Burnham. Mr. Brown described the administrative evolution of parking and said TIGARD CITY COUNCIL/TCDA MINUTES December 5, 2017 City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 I www.tigard-or.gov Page 5 of 11 downtown Tigard has maximized its on-street parking and is now looking at a permit system so downtown employees and residents will have available on-street parking. A three-phase plan was developed to optimize parking for customers, employees and residents. Phases 1 and 2 were completed and expanded 2-hour parking spaces on Ash Avenue,Burnham Street and Tigard Street. Phase 3 will make sure cars are not being stored on the street and that employees and residents have parking available in low-turnover areas. He said the code will be changed by taking out the specific sections by street and adding language that says parking will be"specified by signage." He showed a graph indicating where increased enforcement will occur. Ash Street parking was changed to 2-hour in anticipation of Atwell (residents are charged a$35 fee for parking in their lot). The future retail space in Atwell that will need turnover parking. From 10:00- 2:00 p.m. the 2-hour parking will be extended onto Burnham Street and on Tigard Street. Loading Zone approvals will be changed in the future and will need to come to Council for approval by resolution. Mr. Brown said the recommendation is to create 4-hour spot parking areas and allow purchase of all-day permits for downtown area employees. A fee of$35 is contemplated. Fees and fines will be kept at$50. He said the fine for parking in a disabled parking spot is recommended to be $160.00. Senior Planner Brown showed a slide of peer city parking permit comparison. He said Tigard's proposed$35 permit cost is lower than Milwaukie's and Oregon City's ranges from $20-$60 depending upon location.The cities all have a moving requirement where a car must be moved a certain distance away from the original spot in order to start the clock for another 2-hour period. Tigard's code requires a move of 300 feet away. He showed a slide of suggested areas for 4-hour parking. Staff has looked into the logistics of selling permits online and in the Permit Center, starting in 2018. Mr. Brown asked council for input on permit fees and fines. He noted that some minor errors were discovered in the ordinance material distributed last week and these amendments should be noted in a motion if council votes tonight. Public outreach included letters to 225 businesses downtown and an Open House,which two businesses attended.A presentation was made to the Tigard Downtown Alliance. Letters were sent to downtown businesses again on November 16. Four comments were received on the website and Council has copies of those comments. D. Public Testimony: Mayor Cook called upon those who signed up in favor to testify. Canine Arendes represented the Town Center Advisory Commission (TCAC) and shared three things: 1) Parking is not the reason people come downtown. They want to play, shop, or dine. Parking is an afterthought and parking free is a perk. 2) Tigard has an overall adequate supply but it doesn't feel that way because of distribution. 3) Retail districts that are successful and have good walking environments prioritize parking for visitors. She said the TCAC supports these code changes. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL/TCDA MINUTES — December 5, 2017 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov Page 6 of 11 Mike Brewin, 11225 SW Morgen Court,Tigard 97223,briefly addressed a concern that there was improper notification of the public hearing. He said it was on the agenda and website but most people do not go there. He said there should have been a news media notification with specifics in the last few weeks and mentioned the Cityscape newsletter which used to be mailed to everyone. He noted inconsistent start times and vague and incomplete descriptions of the agenda item. Mr. Brewin said changing wording in the code will directly harm property values of every Tigard residential property. He added that part of the proposal could harm public safety and property protections and advance notice should have been sent to all those affected. He spoke about proposed parking code amendments to 10.28.022 .C, 10.28.020, 7.06.010 and 7.06.020.C.1. In Section 7.06.020.C.1 he noted that the word"washing"was deleted and washing vehicles on public streets has always been illegal in Tigard. He said there was no overwhelming public support for this change. He said he lives on a hill so water and sludge flow down and this creates hazards for pedestrians and is unsightly. He noted it only costs $2 to wash a car, boat or motorhome at a self-serve car wash. He showed a photo of a man servicing a boat parked on the street on a blind curve which created a hazard to oncoming vehicles.Another photo showed a man washing his recreational vehicle and blocking the sidewalk with the hose. He quoted the code from the City of Sherwood which has the same standards as Tigard and asked Council not to lower their standards. He read from Bloomington, Indiana's City Code, Chapter 15 regarding a prohibition on washing/greasing/repairing cars on the street unless it is an emergency and said it is standard language in many locations. Mr. Brewin referred to storage of cars and suggested maintaining 24-hours as the benchmark for vehicle storage. He said this would give the Tigard Police Department more leeway to get vehicles off the street in a timely manner. He said increasing this limit by seven times is irresponsible and the consequence of this code change would be a steady proliferation of people breaking this law in Tigard. Longer storage invites property crimes, car camping, and selfish neighbors storing multiple vehicles which will lead to neighborhood conflicts. He suggested not changing the ten-day limit for motor homes because it creates a wording loophole that could allow parking on the street 365 days a year. Mayor Cook said Council has read the material Mr. Brewin submitted and asked if there was anything he wanted to say not already submitted. Mr. Brewin said he wanted those specific sections discussed and no changes made that will affect quality of life,public safety and longstanding community standards. He added,"If it ain't broke, don't break it." E Public Testimony: Mayor Cook called upon those who have signed up in opposition to testify. No one signed up to speak. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL/TCDA MINUTES — December 5, 2017 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 w-ww.tigard-or.gov Page 7 of 11 F Response to testimony by staff City Attorney Rihala referred to the notification question and said it met requirements. She said there is no requirement for number of days'notice for changes to the Municipal Code, unlike there is with land use ordinances. She said for it just had to be "reasonable notice" and the Attorney General's Office has stated that posting on an agenda is reasonable notice. Senior Planner Brown said in general, staff was simply making the ordinance match the officer practices. CSO Hellstrom said they are clarifying code language in the abandoned vehicle to match current enforcement practices and to make it clear and understandable to citizens. She added that there are only two CSOs and they've used the seven-day timeframe for years. Mayor Cook questioned whether it was better to change laws to match what the city can afford to do or leave the law in place so rule followers will follow it. Councilor Goodhouse asked about a situation in the neighborhood where a truck and travel trailer move around different neighborhoods. Officer Hellstrom said the abandoned vehicle ordinance can be used for the amount of time parked but the trailer itself cannot be on the street from 12:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m. so officers would use a combination of the two code sections. If people are actually staying in the camper,patrol officers would use the "no camping" ordinance. Senior Planner Brown said staff received a letter with concerns about wanting unrestricted parking in front of their business. Nearby 4-hour spots will satisfy their needs and still leave the three spots for customers. Councilor Snider asked about the comment on the evening parking in the lot behind Jeffery Allen. Mr. Brown said if it was made permit only it would be marked for Monday-Friday, daytime only. Councilor Woodard asked how many ADA parking stalls were in the downtown and Senior Planner Brown said there was one for each lot. Councilor Woodard said the downtown is pretty challenging for those in wheelchairs. Mr. Brown said it was not part of the current study but they did get a comment that the ADA stalls do not provide enough room on the passenger side. He said this comment will be given to engineering and staff will take a look at the spots,particularly when the north side of Main Street is designed. Council President Snider said it appeared that the fine for parking in the disabled parking spot is lower than in other jurisdictions. He asked why$460 was changed to $160. Senior Planner Brown said the state changed it and several jurisdictions have not updated their ordinances yet. The $160 amount is in line with the state. Council President Snider said it was inconsistent with our values. Council President Snider asked about removing the restriction about washing cars. Officer Hellstrom said she has never received a complaint about someone washing their car while parked on a street. Council President Snider suggested that was because people are following the law and having it in the code is actually working. Councilors Goodhouse and Anderson agreed with leaving the prohibition in the code. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL/TCDA MINUTES — December 5, 2017 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov Page 8 of 11 Councilor Woodard requested a list of what is being changed and why. Councilor Goodhouse said he is fine with the downtown parking sections but wanted further discussion on abandoned vehicle code chapter. City Manager Wine said staff needs guidance from council and staff will prepare a crosswalk to show what is proposed to change and why to give Council clarification. Councilor Goodhouse asked how people who come downtown regularly and park for the day will be tracked. Senior Planner Brown said police staff will know when people move. It is unlikely they will be ticketed. Officer Hellstrom said it would be difficult for police to track unless they GPS chalk the vehicle. Councilor Goodhouse said he was fine with the downtown parking portion but wished to table the remaining code changes. Councilor Woodard asked if anyone has contacted staff about loading zones. Council President Snider requested that a fine of$300 be put in place for parking in a disabled parking spot. City Manager Wine su.mmari7ed that Council wants to revisit the amount for a disabled parking space violation,reconsider adding washing vehicles back into the section where it was deleted, consider whether removal of a vehicle should be 24 or 72 hours or seven days and provide a listing of changes to the code and the reasons for them. G. Council Consideration: Councilor Goodhouse made a motion to continue to the hearing to January 2,2018 and Councilor Anderson seconded the motion. Mayor Cook conducted a vote and the motion passed unanimously. Yes No Council President Snider ✓ Councilor Woodard ✓ Councilor Anderson ✓ Mayor Cook ✓ Councilor Goodhouse ✓ 7. CONSIDER AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN AN AMENDED IGA FOR THE WALNUT STREET PROJECT Streets and Transportation Project Engineer McCarthy gave the staff report. He said the project construction is complete and this amendment to the IGA with Washington County documents some changes and also provides for plant establishment monitoring in the stormwater treatment swale. Storm water will be cleaned before entering the creek by plants and the city wants to hire a consultant with the expertise to ensure the right plants are used and that they do this job. The city will hire one consultant for five years and Washington County will reimburse the city. The IGA TIGARD CITY COUNCIL/TCDA MINUTES — December 5, 2017 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 I www.tigard-or.gov Page 9 of 11 covers things that were done differently such as replacing a water line that was discovered to be deteriorating, sewer trench work repaving on 112th Avenue and a new flashing light crosswalk on 116th Avenue. Council President Snider moved to authorize the Mayor to sign an amended IGA for the Walnut Street Project. Councilor Goodhouse seconded the motion. Mayor Cook conducted a vote and the motion passed unanimously. Yes No Council President Snider ✓ Councilor Woodard ✓ Councilor Anderson ✓ Mayor Cook ✓ Councilor Goodhouse ✓ 8. NON AGENDA ITEMS—Streets and Transportation Project Engineer McCarthy addressed some questions Council had about the Upper Boones Ferry Road and Durham Road Signal Project. He gave a memo to council and this has been added to the packet for this meeting. He said the original program was to get the Upper Boones Ferry and Durham Road to Highway 99W corridor traffic signals talking to each other. The first steps were completed such as updating computers controlling the traffic signals. Basic coordination was implemented (time-based,mostly green lights down the corridor as much as is possible) and the Summerfield Drive signal was tied together with the Highway 99W signal,which is the biggest improvement that can be made. In summer of 2016 he got news of the settlement ODOT made regarding the Americans with Disabilities Acts settlement and how it would be applied in public rights of way.This set best practices for the state, especially for projects managed by the state with federal funds, such as this one. It took the state and some mobility groups almost a year to figure out what the standards will be. He said they are reasonable in that if we are just updating the electrical system in the cabinet,we do not have to redo the curb. With that we believe we can go forward with a viable project. He said they are looking at tying together the signals from I-5, down Upper Boones Ferry to Durham and then to Tigard High School at 92nd Avenue. In response to a question from Council President Snider, Engineer McCarthy said it made more sense to leave Summerfield to 99W tied together and leave out 98th and 108th because traffic volume is quite a bit lower at those two intersections and does not have the changing peaks and heavy flow that the high school has at the end of a game or tournament. A project re- kick-off meeting was held a few weeks ago. He noted that the Washington County traffic signal staff has been very helpful. Councilor Goodhouse asked if Upper Boones Ferry/Durham Road coming from Tualatin will be considered. Mr. McCarthy said that is part of this but Durham Road is at capacity from that direction. A lot of the slow down for southbound traffic beyond Durham is due to downtown Tualatin. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL/TCDA MINUTES — December 5, 2017 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov Page 10 of 11 Council President Snider noted that the WES line significantly contributes to traffic problems in this area and asked if anything is tied in for the WES. He said the train track signal is tied to the Durham/ Upper Boones signal and this will allow it to be tied to the entire corridor's signals. Mayor Cook said part of this project funded by the City was the school zone flashing lights at Durham elementary and two places at the high school. He asked for feedback on whether this helps the flow on school days during non-peak times and Engineer McCarthy said they think it has. He added that they did turn on the 20 mph twice during the day for lunch periods due to the number of students walking across Durham from the high school. He said this project includes more changes for the crosswalk at Durham with a two red lights and walk/don't walk signs. This will bunch up the walkers a little more and help move traffic through more safely. In response to a question from City Manager Wine regarding the schedule,Mr. McCarthy stated it is still being worked on and the state consultant contract will need to be modified to include the ADA retrofit. At that time the schedule will be more certain. 9. EXECUTIVE SESSION There was none. 10. ADJOURNMENT At 8:44 p.m. Councilor Goodhouse moved for adjournment. Council President Snider seconded the motion and all voted in favor. Yes No Council President Snider ✓ Councilor Woodard ✓ Councilor Anderson ✓ Mayor Cook ✓ Councilor Goodhouse ✓ Carol A. Krager, City Recorder Attest: John L. Cook,Mayor Date TIGARD CITY COUNCIL/TCDA MINUTES — December 5, 2017 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov Page 11 of 11 1114 " City of Tigard Tigard Workshop Meeting Minutes TIGARD December 19, 2017 1. !G—J WORKSHOP MEETING A. At 6:31 p.m. Mayor Cook called the City Council Workshop meeting to order. B. City Recorder Krager called the roll. Present Absent Mayor Cook ✓ Councilor Goodhouse ✓ Council President Snider ✓ Councilor Woodard ✓ Councilor Anderson ✓ C. Mayor Cook asked those in attendance to stand with him for the Pledge of Allegiance. D. Call to Council and Staff for Non Agenda Items— None 2. JOINT MEETING WITH THE PARK AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD Staff present included Parks Manager Martin and Assistant Public Works Director Wright. PRAB members present were Chair Wayne Gross,Troy Mears,Dave Brown,Tristan Irvin and Scott Winkels. Chair Gross said the Council was given a list of topics of concern and noted that many issues are related to the budget. He said the PRAB is aware that Council is considering a local option levy and the Levy and Bond Task Force identified park maintenance as one item that could benefit from increased funding. The other issue is the recreation program which made tremendous strides over the past two years, serving over 23,000 people with only 2 FTE and a few part-time people on staff. He said the PRAB is very concerned about the future of this program because one of the two recreation employees is leaving the city and it is PRABs understanding that the position will not be filled. He said the PRAB did not see how the recreation program can be run with just one coordinator. Not filling the position will be a step backwards. He mentioned that a potential new source of funding is the Transient Lodging Tax which creates an opportunity for parks and recreation to create additional tourism for the city. PRAB Member Mears commented that he has been on the PRAB for over eight years and he has seen a lot happen. After failing once,we got a parks bond measure. Even though it was a bad economy we saw that people support parks. They voted for a park acquisition bond and we got 120 acres with$17 million. The city has a lot more to take care of,including parks that come with new developments. Many people moved to Tigard because it is a great city. We need to continue the momentum and take care of these citizens and make sure we are not mothballing parks. People TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — December 19, 2017 City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 I www.tigard-or.gov Page 1 of 11 voted for parks acquisition and we need to keep them looking beautiful and useable for our citizens. The city has been trying to get a recreation program going for probably twenty years and now has great momentum for recreation. We have spent a lot in the private sector trying to figure out how to do this. He said we've figured it out but still have a lot to learn and will not learn any of that if we stop moving forward. PRAB Member Winkels called Council's attention to the fact that the PRAB took a vote last week and is in support of the city seeking a levy. We have the unfortunate situation of the permanent tax rate being frozen in 1995. Tigard only had 20,000 people then and the service demands have expanded. There is a cap on revenue growth but not a cap on costs. He said he would like to see a robust mountain bike track/bike trail in the city but the challenge is whether this is a safe or responsible thing to do unless park maintenance demands are addressed. He encouraged council to move forward with the levy. PRAB Member Brown said he has served on the PRAB for six years and felt the biggest achievements were the parks base and the establishment of the recreation program. He said he is disappointed about losing the recreation position and not filling the spot. He would like to build on or at least maintain what the city has done such as the Family Fest and the Movies in the Park. PRAB Member Irvin added that when Councilor Woodard came to their meeting he had some good thoughts and one thing they noticed was that the PRAB goals and Council goals clearly tie in together. She said financial support is needed to keep things moving and the danger in stopping and starting is losing that momentum. She said parents of young kids will go elsewhere if programs are discontinued and stop looking for what is available right in their own backyard in Tigard. She said she hoped parks and recreation will have the financial support to work towards the walkable city goal. Maintenance is needed for parks to be safe and we need recreation programs. She said aides and assistants were used but they cannot run the program alone without a program coordinator. Council President Snider said council has endorsed not replacing life safety positions and a recreation assistant does not meet that burden. He said from a private sector angle he wanted to know what specific revenue loss was expected from not replacing or postponing refilling the position. He continued, "Is it more or less than the cost of the FTE,and further,what is the cost of the lost momentum?" He said it may be difficult to quantify but there are always costs to stopping and starting and he would like to know those costs in order to make an intelligent decision. Parks Manager Martin said he can't give loss numbers but guessed the revenue is not equal to the cost of the FTE. He said there will be fewer programs if there is only one person so there is revenue associated with that. City Manager Wine clarified that status of reviewing vacant positions. The City of Tigard has a workforce of 300 people and over the last year experienced turnover. There is not a total hiring freeze;openings are reviewed on a case by case basis to see if positions are critical. Currently there are 20 vacant positions. Long term elimination of those positions may not be viable. Councilor Anderson complimented the PRAB and said they had done a great job. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — December 19, 2017 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov Page 2 of 11 Councilor Woodard asked what other cities around us do when they tighten their belts. PRAB member Brown said Hillsboro has 100,000 people and there are 13 recreation programmers,partly because there are facilities they help operate. He suggested looking at the cost of individual programs. Tigard got a late start. Other cities made a commitment long ago and ours was just funded recently. Public Works Assistant Director Wright said one thing is that Tigard's instructors are contracted. Chair Gross said it is more typical to hire part-time instructors to run programs and most do not do contracts. Councilor Woodard asked how long could it take for a recreation program to begin paying for headcount revenues and Chair Gross said there is not a specific timeframe. He said most children's programs do not pay for themselves and adult programs help pay the costs. He said in general any recreation program is not self-sufficient unless you have a specialized facility. Councilor Woodard asked if the loss of this position would kill the program. Chair Gross said it is unrealistic in the long term to expect one person to run the program. Council President Snider noted that Hillsboro has a local option levy. PRAB member Brown offered an idea of using a part- time library employee to assist with recreation so we do not add to the headcount. This could be a temporary fix while funding is resolved. Public Works Assistant Director Wright said the revenue from shelter and park reservations is hard to estimate. Reservations have doubled and they have one and one-half FTEs handling reservations. She said she was not sure if that level could be maintained. Mayor Cook said he appreciated PRABs passion and time and effort and added, 'We all want the same end result but how we get there may not look the same to all of us." Council President Snider said it sounded like PRAB supports a local option levy passing and hoped to have their help in an active way to move this forward. Chair Gross said there was unanimous support and he thought Council could get some support from the PRAB to help tell the story to the citizens. 3. JOINT MEETING WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON HOUSING ISSUES Planning Commissioner President Fitzgerald said Washington County met with the Tigard Planning Commission on November 27, 2017 to give highlights on affordable housing. The Planning Commission found there are opportunities for Tigard to move forward with and have developed recommendations for Council. President Fitzgerald said since that time the Planning Commission has had a chance to read additional material including the Affordable Housing Report presented to Council on December 20, 2016 and the Angelo Planning Report from 2013. All recommendations dovetail and there are opportunities for Tigard to take and move forward on. She covered a few of the highlights they learned about. Developer incentive requirements could include making it simpler to put in Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) to increase density at a price point available to a wider variety of renters. Inclusionary zoning was recently adopted in Portland and she felt there were some lessons to be learned from that. The City can streamline the permitting process for affordable housing. Ms. Fitzgerald noted that she currently has a project with the City of Portland that is currently the largest TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MINUTES —December 19, 2017 City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 I www.tigard-or.gov Page 3 of 11 affordable housing project in the last 50 years. Portland worked on a modified permitting process which could have taken two months off the schedule. Direct subsidies include SDCs or fees in lieu where every housing or mixed use project could have a fee set aside that goes towards affordable housing gap financing or for the City to buy property for in a targeted area. She said there is a current opportunity because of SW Corridor work to get a memorandum with Metro and TriMet for any surplus land on those projects that does not go forward for transportation uses. The City would get the right of first refusal to purchase land or offer it to affordable housing developers. She said Tigard is not currently taking advantage of the multiple unit tax exemptions. The City is using the vertical housing tax exemption in the Tigard Triangle and downtown urban renewal areas. Planning Commissioner Middaugh said affordable housing is a very complex topic with many factors and statistics involved. He said the economy is still recovering from the recession and for some,affordable housing is a problem. Housing is affordable when a family spends less than 30 percent of their income on housing. Many families spend more than that. He said he would like to learn more about the pros and cons of inclusionary zoning. Planning Commission President Fitzgerald said there are things that can be done immediately such as renter protections (90-day instead of 30-day rent increase notice). She read from a summary which was distributed to Council by Assistant Community Development Director McGuire on December 20, 2016. It listed what is in place in Tigard,what is working and what is underperforming. • Streamlining development—underperforming • Biggest frustration is the complexity of financing. Gap financing is an area where a city can help. The financing for affordable housing often adds a year or two to the project. • Reduced parking—difficult topic for suburbs • Increased density—reduces need for cars. Tigard has an opportunity with the potential for mass transit coming for transit oriented development. Could have less parking and a way to make it more palatable is to work with TriMet and make sure the developer is providing transit passes. • It really depends on whether the community is vocal about parking or not. This varies. • Tigard's Planning Commission has experienced parking concerns with every multi-family project that comes in. The right fit has to be found by Tigard for its community. • The Accessory Dwelling Units are underperforming. Staff recently changed the ADU to 800 square feet in the Triangle and the code is probably where it needs to be but we could encourage ADUs additionally by waiving SDCs or not requiring that the owner live in it. • The City is doing well at tax exemptions. • The Affordable Housing Assistance fee has expired. Could it be reinstated? • Selling or donating land may not have a mechanism in place. Is there a way to figure out better boundaries so surplus land can be put in the pot for affordable housing? • Membership in housing groups—is there a more robust group that could help with the conversation on this issue with the community and neighbors? TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — December 19, 2017 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov Page 4 of 11 Councilor Anderson said this is a good list. He said inclusionary zoning will help with financing. He noted that the City of Bend charges one percent of a project's gross that goes into a kitty for affordable housing. Builders benefit because they can then build the houses. Planning Commission Chair Fitzgerald said the federal tax increment financing market is impacted negatively. She asked the council to let the Planning Commission know how they can help. She said there are builders ready to build ADUs but SDSs are $40,000 on a $20,000 building! Council expressed interest in inclusionary zoning, direct subsidies, fees in lieu of, and waiving a percentage of SDCs. Council President Snider asked for more information on renter protection. Councilor Anderson said affordable housing is a topic discussed by the Homeless Task Force but they have not really attacked it;perhaps a like-minded citizen group could look at options. Councilor Woodard said he would like more information about building workforce housing on park land. Council President Snider said he is interested in it going anywhere it would be useful and noted that there is a lot of undeveloped park land owned by the city. Mayor Cook added what is nice to see is that it is a regional issue more than trying to solve it ourselves. There are also private companies involved and hopefully that will continue. Planning Commissioner Middaugh mentioned he is also on the Bond and Levy Task Force and noted there are a lot of competing needs. PRAB also just reported some tonight. He felt the City should consider these competing needs and anything that will cost more should be considered carefully. 4. RECEIVE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE TASK FORCE FOR THE HOMELESS Senior Management Analyst Wyatt, ELGL Fellow Westendorf and Luke-Dorf Home Outreach Service Worker,Jeanne-Marie Ritter gave the presentation for this item,including a PowerPoint. Other Homeless Task Force members present were Carol Herron,Lexi Hallum, and Sue Stephens. Senior Management Analyst Wyatt said their report and a summary of recommendations was included in the agenda packet and all materials are on the homeless resources page of the City's website. He noted that Councilor Anderson was on the task force and Associate Planner Warren and Police Officer Wakem spoke to the group on how they see the community needs. Articles were published in the Cityscape and several citizens commented and dialoged as this issue is top of mind for many. Council wanted to identify key projects and actions the city of Tigard could take. There are other regional players but we wanted to identify what Tigard could do. The task force came up with recommendations most feasible for the city. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — December 19, 2017 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov Page 5 of 11 ELGL Fellow Westendorf discussed data on homelessness. He said this the first year it has increased in Tigard since in 2010. Overall Oregon saw an increase of 5.4 percent. Main driver is lack of affordable housing. Rents have gone up 27 percent and an average worker needs to make $24.00 per hour to live in an affordable house. He said the Point in Time homeless census is done in January each year and the latest figures were 369 unsheltered and 520 in shelters. He acknowledged that the data is most likely low as homeless individuals are fluid in location and the count is done by volunteers. Washington County had a ten-year plan to end homelessness which expired in 2017. Many strides were made but it will be extended. The County provides resources for severe weather shelters and implements a continuum of care. Metro is planning-based so their focus is more on affordable housing. Ms. Ritter listed the task force recommendations. 1. Expand and improve services to homeless individuals by working with non-profits The main priority is to assist with the Just Compassion day center down payment.Just Compassion will take care of half. ($60,000) This would allow the purchase of the property they currently lease. In-kind support includes producing shower cards,maintaining funding for the post office box, and consider providing public restrooms or portable restrooms in the downtown core and nearby neighborhoods. 2. Expand shelter and housing options for homeless and others facing housing barriers Partner with Luke Dorf for homeless outreach;allocate funding for four hours of police overtime dedicated to the homeless community and appointing a Homeless Services Coordinator. 3. Improve public understanding and the public's ability to assist in improving the situation Approve a guiding statement for the City's approach to homelessness,host an annual service event (including city councilors) focused on the homeless, create an internal tracking system for incidents,participate in the annual Point-in-Time count,issue a proclamation for Hunger and Homelessness Awareness Week, create a GIS map showing resources, and replicate Oregon City's outreach stories which tell the stories of police officers interacting with the homeless community. 4. Advocate this for regional, state and federal support. This cannot be solved at the city or county level. The Task Force would like to meet quarterly and once annually with council. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — December 19, 2017 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov Page 6 of 11 Council questions: Councilor Woodard asked for clarification with regard to the volunteer coordinator and asked if there had been any discussion on that person coming from one of these groups to volunteer. Ms. Herron responded that there has been a change of directors in Love, Inc. and a new executive director but was not sure she has had a chance to get on board. Their focus is more at-risk individuals living in vehicles or apartments and providing essentials or goods so they can save money for rent. Just Compassion is concerned with the homeless on the streets or living in their cars. Councilor Woodard said it is hard for the city to create a position due to competing priorities. He asked if Just Compassion might consider supplying a person. Ms. Stephens said they have resources and this was a possibility. Councilor Goodhouse said council created this as a task force body and asked if it is something that should be turned into an official board or committee. Ms. Ritter said the work of the task force was to find out how much more there is to do by seeing what other cities are doing and evaluating what is working. Mayor Cook stated a preference for extending the task force rather than creating a committee. Council President Snider asked Finance and Information Services Director LaFrance if he knew what the percentage of city marijuana taxes going towards the Marland Henderson grant would be and suggested dedicating the next four years of marijuana tax to the down payment. Mayor Cook advised talking to Councilor Henderson about this proposal first. Councilor Anderson said one process of this task force was to not reinvent the wheel. Beaverton used Just Compassion (Tigard) to develop their shelter system. The building has been identified and they are leasing it. It makes sense to buy it rather than throw money at a building that is not owned.. Councilor Woodard said police officers go out and communicate and assist at encampments in Tigard and asked if the four hours of overtime is in addition to that. Mr. Wyatt responded that this figure was a total for the year and addresses the growing workload of proactively visiting homeless camps, doing outreach,and potentially working with Luke Dorf. Councilor Goodhouse asked if it had to be a police officer or could it be an experienced volunteer like Eugene uses. Mr.Wyatt said they could look into that. Councilor Woodard asked about tracking homeless incidents and Mayor Cook noted that Chief McAlpine has devised a way for officers to code reports so statistics can show how much time is being spent already in their daily jobs. Mr. Wyatt said that was a good solution. Councilor Woodard noted that there are GIS maps of overlaps of non-profit and for-profit resources. Regarding the Just Compassion property,Ms. Herron said the down payment gives them the opportunity to secure other money. If they do not own the property or land they cannot seek grants;it is leverage. Council recommended that the task force continue to meet as they wish and complimented Mr. Wyatt and Mr. Westendorf for doing a great job facilitating. Mayor Cook thanked the task force for meeting and for their recommendations. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MINUTES —December 19, 2017 City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 I www.tigard-or.gov Page 7 of 11 5. DISCUSS SOCIAL SERVICE AND COMMUNITY GRANT PROCESS Finance and Information Services Director LaFrance, Confidential Executive Assistant Lutz and Assistant City Manager Zimmerman discussed the process for administering the social service and community event grants,including the Marland Henderson grant. Issues council has brought up to staff include applicant"gaming" of these two sections,lack of coordination, alignment with council goals and the potential use of the transient lodging tax (11_,T). There was also concern about how to wrap the new Marland Henderson grant into this. Mr. LaFrance said the proposed process is outlined in a memo in the agenda packet for this item and takes care of the council's concerns. Outlined in memo, takes care of concerns council brought forward. He said with budgetary concerns they would like to freeze the dollar amount to the current year's budget ($305,000) split approximately 70/30 with the ability to make adjustments. The TLT will be used for$50,000 of regional events. One of the largest changes staff is proposing is to have a single subcommittee to review the Henderson, social services and community event grants. This group will consist of a Council member, two citizens a Budget Committee members and when reviewing the Henderson grant, Councilor Henderson or his designee. They will be authorized to vary by five percent in each category the split based upon quality of applications and how well they align with council goals. The Council and Budget Committee have the final say in awarding these grants. Forms were revised to make it easier to identify which grant an entity is applying for and also a line asking them to say how their proposal aligns with council goals. Mayor Cook asked staff to correct the Marland Henderson grant form to use the word grant. He asked whether the goals should say council goals/strategic plan. Councilor Goodhouse said that made sense and Council President Snider suggested adding both. Councilor Woodard suggested adding a statement that if it does not relate to the goals or strategic plan it will not be disqualified but will not get bonus points. Finance and Information Services Director LaFrance said Council gave staff the authority to contact applicants to if it appears they have applied for the wrong one. Mayor Cook said as the budget gets developed it may be found that$305,000 is too large an amount. Mr. LaFrance said staff has been discussing that and they recommend asking the sub-committee to prioritize recommendations so if the Budget Committee wants to draw a new line,we will know which services/events drop off the list. In response to a concern from Council President Snider about doing interviews for all categories the same day,Mr. LaFrance said staff is contemplating not having interviews for community events. Assistant City Manager Zimmerman said Council President Snider's point is well taken and staff will work with the sub-committee to come up with a process that separates them. City Manager Wine said council received correspondence asking if there is any intent to prohibit folks from applying in multiple categories. Council President Snider said there is not an event he could think of that could overlap both categories but acknowledged that the same entity could apply for two very separate things. City Manager Wine said that was the example given in the TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MINUTES —December 19, 2017 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov Page 8 of 11 correspondence. Assistant City Manager Zimmerman said there could be overlap in social services and the Henderson grant. Staff will make sure that applicants apply for the grant that will be most fruitful for them. 6. DISCUSSION ON SIX-YEAR PLAN FOR THE TRANSIENT LODGING TAX Finance and Information Services Director LaFrance and Assistant City Manager Zimmerman led a discussion with Council on a six-year Transient Lodging Tax Plan. Mr. LaFrance said on August 8, 2017, Council adopted a TLT for hotel-type stays in Tigard,including AirBnb. He said the tax will generate roughly$625,000 annually. At least 70 percent must be spent on tourism and tourism related facilities. Up to 30 percent can be used on general governmental services. Staff's recommendation is funding a number of areas the city already does, some related to tourism and some falling more under the general government category. Staff is asking that Council direct the PRAB to undertake a process over the next year to review facilities such as tournament fields or BMX bike tracks that could be built with approximately$3 million generated by bonding this revenue source over a ten-year period. Mr. LaFrance said funding for the Tigard Downtown Affiance ($40,000 currently) could come out of the existing 30 percent. Other downtown events such as farmers markets draw people in but would not necessarily be considered as tourism so their funding could come from this source as well. There is also some city overhead for general services such as safety, transportation,parks, etc. allowed to be paid for out of the 30 percent by law. Existing support such as that for Tigard 4th of July, Festival of Balloons and Broadway Rose Theater ($50,000 currently) could come out of the 70 percent as well as the Tigard Chamber's existing visitor center ($4,000) and the debt service on the$3 million facility. Mr. LaFrance noted that one concern brought up in letters was escalating costs over time and he emphasized that this is a general plan and does not set budget. Mayor Cook said when the Budget Committee was trying to figure out one and a half years ago how to help the TDA hire a part-time person,it was up against opening the library on Thursdays,hiring police officers and Summerlake Park sprinkler repair. The$40,000 did not make the cut.At that time he recommended exploring a TLT and he thanked council for considering it. Looking ahead to FY 2023 the TLT will free up $250,000 in the general fund. He said if we bond a project now we can let the hoteliers and Oregon Restaurant and Lodging Association know that we are building something to bring heads in beds. Council President Snider suggested a robust zip line facility be considered along with the Babe Ruth level ball field and BMX track. Councilor Woodard commented in both categories someone will be needed to coordinate this. He said this could be combined with the recreation staff position and he was surprised not to see resources to fund a coordinator. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — December 19, 2017 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov Page 9 of 11 Councilor Goodhouse wants more activities and events that bring people downtown, such as a more robust farmers market. He said whatever money is bonded for should be a well thought out,long term use; something with lasting popularity. He mentioned Leavenworth,Washington where tourists are bussed in to see Christmas lights. Councilor Woodard added that PRAB is still interested in a downtown plaza space and has some money left from the parks bond. He noted that activation of downtown spaces requires servicing that space and that is typically done through recreation staff. He mentioned Council President Snider's zip line idea and said combining tree canopy rappelling activities, an obstacle course and a BMX track provides warrior-type competitions which attract a lot of people. Mayor Cook noted that restrooms in the downtown are listed as part of the homeless agenda discussed earlier but they would also make it easier on downtown businesses and help activate the space. He suggested that as PRAB is asked to come up with a project,maintenance needs to be considered. Some items will have a longer maintenance requirement than others. It doesn't help us in the long run if we do not account for that maintenance. Councilor Goodhouse suggested an indoor place such as a shell of a building appropriate for many uses. He agreed that tournaments will attract hotel and motel stays. Assistant City Manager Zimmerman said it may be awhile before a big project comes up but smaller projects may arise during the year. We need to look at things we can fund with the TLT that are already being done. As ideas bubble up they will be vetted from a holistic standpoint (maintenance standpoint or market analysis) in order to deliver something that will be a return for the TLT. Councilor Goodhouse suggested that if we are looking at something big,why not team up with the cities of Tualatin and Sherwood and find a strategic place. Council consensus was for staff to continue forward. A separate enterprise fund will be created making it transparent and easy to track. 7. NON AGENDA ITEMS—None. 8. EXECUTIVE SESSION —None. 9. ADJOURNMENT At 9:12 p.m. Council President Snider moved for adjournment. Councilor Anderson seconded the motion. Mayor Cook conducted a vote and all voted in favor. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — December 19, 2017 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 I www.tigard-or.gov Page 10 of 11 Yes No Mayor Cook V Councilor Goodhouse V Council President Snider V Councilor Woodard V Councilor Anderson V Carol A. Krager, City Recorder Attest: John L. Cook,Mayor Date TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MINUTES December 19, 2017 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 1 www.tigard-or.gov Page 11 of 11 AIS-3436 4. Business Meeting One Meeting Date: 03/06/2018 Length (in minutes): 5 Minutes Agenda Title: Appoint Town Center Advisory Commission Member Prepared For: Sean Farrelly, Community Development Submitted By: Joe Patton, Community Development Item Type: Resolution Meeting Type: Council Business Meeting - Main Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Shall Town Center Advisory Commission alternate member Kelsey Parpart be appointed as a voting resident member? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends approval of a resolution appointing Kelsey Parpart as a voting resident member of the Town Center Advisory Commission. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY Two voting resident members, Richard Shavey and Josh Kearney, resigned from the Town Center Advisory Commission in February 2018. Kelsey was interviewed on November 29, 2017 by the Mayor's Appointment Advisory Committee and subsequently appointed by Council as a non-voting alternate member on December 12, 2017. Kelsey has expressed her interest in being appointed as a voting resident member. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Council could decide to not approve the recommendation. This would leave two voting resident vacancies on the Town Center Advisory Commission. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS N/A DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION December 12, 2017 Council appointment of Kelsey Parpart as a non-voting alternate member of the Town Center Advisory Commission Attachments Resolution-Parpart Appointment CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 18 — A RESOLUTION APPOINTING KELSEY PARPART AS A VOTING MEMBER OF THE TOWN CEN 1'ER ADVISORY COMMISSION. WHEREAS, there currently exists two vacancies for voting members, up to two vacancies for non-voting alternate members and up to two non-voting ex officio members of the Town Center Advisory Commission; and WHEREAS,the Mayor's Appointment Advisory Committee interviewed Kelsey Parpart on November 29, 2017. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: Kelsey Parpart is appointed as a voting member to fill an unexpired term through December 31,2019. SECTION 2: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This day of 2018. Mayor-City of Tigard A 1"1 EST: City Recorder-City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 18-_ Page 1 AIS-3391 5. Business Meeting One Meeting Date: 03/06/2018 Length (in minutes): 40 Minutes Agenda Title: Joint Meeting with Town Center Advisory Commission Submitted By: Sean Farrelly, Community Development Item Type: Joint Meeting-Board or Other Juris. Meeting Type: Town Center Development Agency Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Town Center Development Agency Board/ Town Center Advisory Commission Joint Meeting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Meet with the Town Center Advisory Commission to discuss their 2017 Annual Report and their draft 2018 Goals. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The Town Center Advisory Commission (TCAC) makes recommendations to the Board of the Town Center Development Agency (TCDA) on urban renewal policy, budget and implementation measures. Since updating its bylaws in September 2017, the TCAC makes recommendations on urban renewal policy, budget and implementation measures for the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal area as well as to the City Center (Downtown) urban renewal area. The Agenda for the meeting will be: •Introductions • City Staff Opening Remarks •2017 Annual Report of the TCAC •2017 Recommendations for TCAC •Review 2018 TCAC Draft Goals •Discussion Two items will inform the joint meeting discussion. The first is the TCAC's 2017 Annual Report, describing the key activities of the commission (required by TCAC by-laws); it was previously provided in the November 30, 2017 Council Newsletter. Among the projects that the TCAC advised on that had significant milestones in 2017 is the Math Street at Fanno Creek Property Demolition, Cleanup, and selecting a potential developer for the site; design of Rotary Plaza; and voter approval of the City Center Urban Renewal Plan Substantial Amendment and the new Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan. The TCAC recommendations for TCDA consideration is "Attachment A" in the 2017 Annual Report. These are based on the focus of Walking and Parking in Downtown, to support the City's Strategic Plan and the City Center Urban Renewal Plan. The TCAC developed draft goals for 2018 at their January 10th meeting. The TCAC will review these draft goals with the TCDA Board before finalizing them at their March meeting. The goals are: "Develop a strong knowledge base of the Tigard Triangle to inform our recommendations for the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Implementation Project. •Participate in educational and planning activities that result from the SW Corridor Project to inform our recommendations to regional and local government entities •Identify and prioritize opportunities for development to improve walkability, equity, and connectivity across both urban renewal districts 'Explore ways that policy changes can encourage and support affordable housing and equitable business development. OTHER ALTERNATIVES N/A COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS Tigard City Council Goals 2017-19: Goal 3: Make Downtown Tigard a Place People Want To Be. Tigard Comprehensive Plan Special Planning Areas- Downtown: Goal 15.2 Facilitate the development of an urban village. Tigard Strategic Plan Goal 3: Engage the community through dynamic communication. DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION October 17, 2017 Town Center Development Agency Board/ Town Center Advisory Commission Joint Meeting Attachments TCAC 2017 Annual Report PowerPoint Urban Renewal Data 2017 Annual Report of the Town Center Advisory Commission to the Board of the Town Center Development Agency December 1, 2017 The Town Center Advisory Commission (TCAC),which formally changed its name from the City Center Advisory Commission (CCAC) in September 2017,adopted annual goals and objectives for calendar year 2017. The annual agenda for the TCAC was largely devoted to developing and implementing the goals.This report is organized around the adopted 2017 TCAC Goals and Objectives. Goal 1. Support URA Project Infrastructure&Development a. Monitor, review, and provide input on key projects b. Monitor and review Improvement Programs Implementation Key Projects o Attwell off Main implementation o Fanno Creek Remeander o Main @ Fanno&associated Brownfield work o Parking management (public parking facilities) o Public restrooms o Tigard Street Heritage Trail&plaza development o Urban Lofts/Nicoli(transit&housing) Outcomes: Staff provided the TCAC with regular updates on the progress of the Attwell off Main (Ash/Burnham)mixed use redevelopment project,which officially opened May 2017. The Main Street at Fanno Creek project reached major milestones,including the demolition and remediation of the site utili7ing EPA Brownfields grants. In addition to regular briefing by staff to the whole commission,two Commissioners served on the interview panel for the Request for Letters of Interest to develop the site.The panel interviewed the one respondent and nude a recommendation to the Board of the TCDA to start negotiating a development and disposition agreement (DDA). The TCAC looks forward to the completion of DDA negotiations once the environmental requirements have been met. The TCAC was briefed on new downtown parking regulations that are under consideration. The TCAC was briefed on the Tigard Street Heritage Trail design. The TCAC has stated a strong preference for public restrooms and a water feature to be included in the design of Rotary Plaza. The TCAC chair and vice chair wrote a letter of support for a Federal"Our Town"grant application to fund public art and historic installations that would add amenities for the trail. The Commission was briefed regularly on the Metro CET grant-funded Main Street Lofts project to study the Tigard Transit Center and neighboring properties for redevelopment.At the October meeting the TCAC reviewed the Financial Analysis and Implementation Strategies and endorsed a strategy to continue to pursue affordable housing as a part of the SW Corridor project. The TCAC supported and participated in the process that resulted in the May 2017 voter approval of a 1 Substantial Amendment to the City Center Urban Renewal plan.The amendment increases the size of the district by 37.7 acres,thereby increasing the District's capacity to reach the approved maximum indebtedness by$2.8 million.This will ensure more urban renewal projects are completed. Two commissioners and one alternate served on the committee that awards grants through the Urban Renewal Improvement Program. Goal 2. Monitor Mid/Long-term projects located downtown and/or likely to have impacts on downtown Implementation o Equitable Housing Grant o Civic Center Facilities Planning o Main St/Green St Phase II o Sidewalk Infill(area of interest: Hall Blvd) o SW Corridor o Plaza opportunities Outcomes: Commissioners receive regular briefings on the Equitable Housing Grant activities. Individual commissioners also attended the SW Corridor Equitable Housing:Learning&Sharing Session. City Center Facilities planning updates from the council liaison and the TCAC chair have been shared as liaison reports,while the TCAC Vice Chair serves on the Levy and Bond Advisory Task Force related to City Center Facilities Planning. Members of the TCAC participate in SW Corridor planning activities and the TCAC has a designated representative and alternate representing the commission on the SW Corridor Citizens Advisory Committee. TCAC has been briefed by engineering staff on the Capital Improvement Plan(Main Street/Green Street phase 2) and sidewalk infill gap analysis and potential future funding. Plaza opportunities within the Tigard Street Heritage Trail and the Main a@ Fanno redevelopment site have been considered by the TCAC. Goal 3. Communications &Engagement a. Liaisons b. Tigard Downtown Affiance c. Communication appropriate for all Tigard communities d. Communication with Council/CCDA Board e. Work with Economic Development staff Implementation a. Liaison Role&Scope o Attend meetings when downtown related agenda items listed o Identify liaisons for TT AC,SW Corridor CAC,and PRAB.Appoint main liaison and a second. 2 b. Invite TDA to provide regular briefings c. Advocate for a variety of outreach activities and formats to promote inclusive communications d. Chair/Vice Chair regularly attend Council/CCDA Board meetings [when downtown related agenda items listed] and majority of Commissioners will attend/participate in Joint Meetings with CCDA e. Engage existing Downtown business/property owners and potential developers/new businesses Outcomes: The TCAC continued to maintain and improve its communications with other boards and commissions. One or more commissioners routinely attended meetings and/or monitored the agendas of the Tigard City Council,Park and Recreation Advisory Board (DRAB),Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee(TTAC) and the TTAC Bicycle and Pedestrian Subcommittee. The TCAC named liaisons to these committees. The TCAC had two joint meetings with the Board of the TCDA in 2017.The chair of the TCAC regularly attended TCDA Board meetings,and Council/TCDA's liaison regularly attends TCAC meetings. The Tigard Downtown Alliance (TDA) Chair provided updates to the TCAC on current activities and to discuss ways to collaborate on downtown revitalization twice in 2017.Commissioners attended events planned by the IDA,including Downtown Dialogues and the field trip to Milwaukie.TCAC members also attended the 2017 Oregon Main Street Conference in McMinnville. TCAC members provided communication recommendations related to increasing access to public meetings that staff adopted. TCAC was briefed by independent commercial real estate experts on the current commercial market for retail and other commercial spaces in Downtown Tigard. Goal 4. Walking& Parking Focus • Develop policy and project recommendations to support the city's Strategic Plan& the City Center Urban Renewal Plan Implementation o Learn about Downtown walking and parking o Consider opportunities related to the Tigard Street Heritage Trail o Consider mobility and accessibility concerns Outcomes: The TCAC researched and discussed policy and project recommendations to support the city's Strategic Plan&the City Center Urban Renewal Plan. Final recommendations to the TCDA are included as an attachment to this report. The Town Center Advisory Commission looks forward to further progress in the year to come, particularly on working on its new charge to provide recommendations on implementing the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan. 3 On behalf of the Town Center Advisory Commission, Koh anne Arendes Kate Rogers 0 Chair Vice-Chair 4 Attachment A Recommendations for 2017 TCAC Annual Report Recommendations for Town Center Development Agency Consideration Background The Town Center Advisory Commission (TCAC)is charged with advising the Town Center Development Agency (TCDA) on policy and projects related to the City Center Urban Renewal Plan and the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan. Prior to September 5,2017, the commission was known as the City Center Advisory Commission (CCAC),and for the majority of 2017 the group's advisory capacity was limited to the City Center Urban Renewal area.The commission is charged with producing an annual report and recommendations for the TCDA's consideration. The commission adopted a goal to develop policy and project recommendations related to walking and parking to support the city's Strategic Plan and the City Center Urban Renewal Plan at the beginning of 2017. The intent was to gain general knowledge about walking and parking in downtown retail districts and information related to current walking and parking conditions in Downtown Tigard.The research conducted on walking and parking allowed the commission to develop a shared group understanding of the Downtown walking environment and potential for improvements. Findings Walkable downtowns provide a variety of destinations that attract users throughout the day and into the night.A number of possible responses to enhance walkability were identified in the research process and commissioners were encouraged to see that the city has already adopted many commonly recommended policies, such as initiating a Safe Routes to Schools program,changing regulations to increase street connectivity,adopting pedestrian-friendly design standards,and managing public parking. One important lesson from the commission's research is that destination,activities,and events bring people downtown. So although parking serves an important function,it is a supportive function-not a reason to come Downtown.Ultimately,Downtown Tigard will be a successful walking neighborhood when there are a wide variety of destinations that are comfortable and safe for people of all ages and abilities to reach by foot. 2017 Recommendations The Commission developed the following recommendations to ensure continued investments and support for the Main Street revitalization currently underway,with an emphasis on actions that support walking access into Downtown and encourage walking within the area. Recommendations are intended to be achievable in the short-term and support existing policy adopted in the city-wide Strategic Plan, the Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan and the City Center Urban Renewal Plan. • Prioritize lighting for trails that lead into Downtown and identified segments of the Fanno Creek Trail within Downtown • Ensure sufficient visitor parking is available through the implementation of Phase 2 and 3 of the Downtown public parking management plan,including management of employee parking • Proactively seek opportunities to acquire and consolidate land over the next two years for public spaces and to ensure a range of housing options is available to Tigard residents and families of all income levels • Continue funding of the urban renewal improvements grant program at a level of$50,000- $100,000 a year for each district --- City of Tigard Respect and Care I Do the Right Thing I Get it Done TCDA/TCAC Joint Meeting OMININIMMOMMEMINIMMINI 6 March 2018 •• " TIGARD TCDA City of Tigard Agenda • Introductions • City Staff Opening Remarks • 2017 Annual Report of the TCAC • 2017 Recommendations for TCAC • 2018 TCAC Draft Goals • Discussion TM X• City of Tigard ' . i' 2017 Annual Report of the TCAC City Center Urban Renewal Plan , - Goal 1. Support URA Project Infrastructure & -v. m �: _IFP Ask '' , `" ,e Development /1 �,' ,, "' _ Goal 2. Monitor Mid/Long-term projects located rao' downtown and/or likely to have impacts on downtown City Center ,,; `Urban Renewal iii.' •,\0 Past, Prsent,Tuture Goal 3. Communications & Engagement �". An interactive maP of Projects in „,.. Downtown Tigard funded or inspired by urban renewal. Goal 4. Walking & Parking Focus C(( • City of Tigard 22%X2•% _. ,,,-. .. �. w.,.,,w .e.. . .. X:X XXxY" X%%X X:. %XXX%XX 4"`{ . 2017 . .x.:-. + ~commendations for Town Center X%xXxXxxXx xx} y --X::X % x..x.:x::X•• .Gx %XXxxXx # ,,,,..•., xxx xxx:: '? %x74%%'2 `. %xXX+xG%%x%x Y • %%:xxx . Development Agency Yx x KxxX%X7xeXx % x.:% x X:'. %hXX%X% %%%YX,vvv .:.X%n .'SXXxxXX:,. .. .•••.•.;x ,..,X::`:::}:r.%::XXX::%X> •"X%XXXY.x XXXX%XXXX 1222-.•r.'f %%%..X%%XXX%:. KX %XS .4xkXXXX% XX}. , XX%XX%XXXXX%% • • Light public trails that E X K XX o Downtown and prioritize trail lighting f x::x::X::X::X:: � X g g Y xxxxxxxx xxxxXXxxxX i%'{X -'i''-' % X }%hXXXX ?G•F 2x.2 %2%..72..x..%..Y.::%::xxx::%::X:: %%} •% K XX xxxxxXxxxxxxxxxxxXXxx X <x�x xX �identified segments . X� nno Creek Trail withinthe city center xA siic? , • K .Cu' ?-x %Y }' ::kxx%X'%xxxxxxxxxxxxx%xxx%%x}4 KX txx X 74: Y% X \ %X XXx..%XX%X . . X%74 %xx.,,xh.G' { ?+. .72x% %XXXxxx X C X ..x::% 12:%xc -c: x X X Xx %xxx :• :n ewa I d: ,t r i ct � :Xxx: x72_ �x% x %x xXX %%x.:XxX::xXx.: x { x xYx:•x:.x'> % •�>ixxx%xXxxX%%xxxx%xxxxxxxxxXx% %%XXxxXx% h Xh .xxxx. x: % % %..%..X..x..x::x:•%::%::%..%:. x..:r %%%.%x%.:%.. % �. %.%%%::XXx: Y GX x x{2.X21. YXXXX%XXxxXx• .% CY X. X YX%XXX%XXX %.0{k x%Y %hX %XXX Y•%:x Y %..x::X:.x::x::74 .. .:: Y ..... :..x..74::%::x::742 X .4.1.,2-.12271::7222.22::X 'x.,k%xxxxxxxxx:x.%h:Y .0%Y' X%'. . %X xxxxxxxxcx 'X%}:%SKY:74X21%%X:x :\X'Lx% v'2% Xx%XxXXXX%xXX%XXx% .%X% X%% %%%::X%X:2%%x::%X%:: %h:7{%74::%x74::xXx::74%X.:x'X .X' %xY.xxx..<...::xxx::xx74:xx ..:L:.42'..%x::%XX'X% 'xxx :X xx.XXXXXXX%XxxxXxXXXXXX%%%XXX: xx%XXxxXxxxcXX 74xX%XX % XX .'xxx Y++�: xXXXXXY x X h C%74XXx% x Y ..%xXX" ;X ...X%%X XXXxxXXxxXxXxxxxxXXXXXXX% Y fXx X7 % . % „X X nX . .:xx77XxXxXxxxxxXXX74Xxxxr xkraa} %Xxx P e; e.••t Phase . 1.: g } xXxX%X%XxXxXxXxXxXxXxXx X xXX x xXx.. k :: one a e n t plan forth•• x72::xxx::xxx::xxx::xxx::xxx:: titxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx Yom' xx%xxxxxxxxxxx xx xxxxxxxX.xxxxxxxxxxx. Xxxxxxxx.: :x: • txx%%x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx%xxX %:xxx:X::x::x::X::%::74::X::%::%::xxx:: x:'. ::xxx•-%::%::x••xrxnx::x:%::X::74:' ::74::7L2:xxx::X::?':12x..:4:.X::x::%::} :;:J :•X:.%..x:::•exx2:%122X:.%:.x::X::x::x:::mx:: 44}: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx MEN r ze m p l o eer •+,:Y l ..X .' xt KHK �.� c; >< sei n E "XXX%XXX%XXXzxxXx :.X722 XXX::XXX::XXX= X. y . :::x:X::X::X::x::X::%::x::x::72::x::X::X::x::%::x::x:� x... .%..X �.x::x::%::X::x::x::X::x::X...,.. ..x::X::%::X::X::X.....x::X::X. 3 �r permitting % X'•X%72:7 22:4X^{ x7LxxxxxxcXXxxxxxXXX2•X XXxx%xxx% h...,: ":4%%xxXx%•-xxxx%xXX xxx%XxxxxcxcxxcXxxxxx::::x/xx%x72%xxxxxxxxxx^f:{... .ii ..27{7.42 xXX'Jxxx::XXx::7472%::%X%:•% XxXXX:' k:.2}: --.......... :.n'.%:. •7:%:.....xXX::xXx:Xxx::%X%:12x72%::%%x::Xxx::%Y.X::%%x::Y.%%::xxx:Xxx..:.:.r.. • .X "%�X%x%%%xxx%XXx%% x .,> x xxxx::%%%%%%xxxx X7Gx7CXX%%xx% ..{h.:: :} Y. ...%v%X%}}.%%%%%%%%Y%xXX%%% ?.'X::X::%::x::x::x::x::x : •' •. X%%x72%x::x:.%%72%:.%%"%k.t:w.:x..xXx::. :X% %X:{X%%xxxXXx-XY %4..`XX%XXXx xjj HE :+iCG�)�tlJ( �pL�ylM{ xxxx %knxx%X%%x %X%XXXXXX%%X%%%7�C7C� �%7C�] 7i7Gh�Gi �7[XR % % X:x::X::X......%::X::X::X::X::X::%..r...X::X:.%::%..72..X:%..x: ..::72::X::X::X::k:....Y::X::x::X:%122X::X::%::X::x:::'::X::x::h:.X::x::Y- •XY'•• ,x :. XXX:{%%XXXxx:XXxxXx%X%•CXX%%xXX%XxxxX xXx k%:....... X%%%%%%xxxxxx:GX7{x:XXx XX:774xXxXx%%7.XY.%XXXXX.X:rxX%%%XXX %X::::%:{::X:{X:74%X::%7272:2xxx::XXx::xxX::XXX::X74xcx%X:xXX22XXX2:XxxxX%%::xXx...IX:';.%%'%%XxxxX:xxxxxc%.... XXXxx:.X':x72..:XXXxccc xxxcx:%72X::' %74X%x%xxxx X%%%%xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxXxxx xxx%xxx%xxxxx%xxxxxi./ .,::4xxxxxxxxxxx x%xxxx%x%xxxxxxxxXXx%xxxx%%XXX ::X::%::%::%::X:X::%::x::%::%::%::x::X::x::%:2x2:x::%::%::%::%:X::%::%::x122 X::X::X:1 .. .. ... .. .. .. 4 %%%%X X%Xk'. 2122•:{x:12%%%':X%%:•%XX::%%%::%72X:X%.{::%%%::%X%..Y XX::%xX::X%X::X%%%:: x 2x22%.. J:xxxxx%%%%xxxxxxx%xxx xxxx~ :221.2 %xxxXxxXxx XXxXxxxx%X%%Xxx%xxxX%xxxx7G%XXx% %xxXx%%%%�%X7{7{%7:x:C x:....•..••%..X..x..X.:X::x:X::74::72::x::72::x::X:12%"" 72•'7:::X::ixxX::x::x..X..X:x1212%12:. X::%12.%122%x%212}:::%::X:': :::X:X:1274:: 'x::]{%XXX%%%XXX% %XXxxXx%%%x%xXx%%X X'::;X72%xxXx%?'XxxxX X%%XX x;,,e .:x%Xxx%%XXX%%X%%kX'!`:xX x122'.'..,F'%XXX% I:::::::::: 72%x72 %xxxx %%1212%%x12:%%X:%%%::X%%::%}%::%X%,,'..•XX%x::XXvXi}%�.x/:�%x(72 ':��%f{y%]�%L1�[ �XXt::7Xy1�XX.�yX1��:%yy%M ::X%%::%X%%::".XX::k%%::XX ':% %:X%%::x%%:::y%L}�%Lx::X%%::%`':x::XXX::x%%::Y X::XXX:X%%12:x. ':::5.%::xxx:: X1212%XX:' X} '%xiti%:%%X::'\%122"x% ;%122x%Xx XXX% x74xXxxxX x7:xxxxXxxxXXxxxi7�. :M1}Nf 7f}:TM» �[-':x MRXK7M1i X��R��X4iiR=jL .. .� � .� X x7FR `FEFF--y�c. XX7%�7,,�Lpq'GGt,�Y��C 121��L■■p■�}7p�� :II 7C1�C �y.C.hX• ••x}•'C%%%x% .......x..,•.......„.. %%..xxx::xXX12:xxx::XX.::%7.".+f::xxx:: x'L�XNcc :x X72 xc.c.xM� Ixx x Istur x72}. ,321.x%% .. .. xXXXXxXkx:{ v%xXXXXxxx:t%xxx x%%.{%%%%X X74::XXX:.x%Y.: xx::xxxx7474x::xxx::xxx..xxxxxxxx.%x.x %X74::xx..:Xxx::xxxcxx%::X 2:xxx%xx-xxxx::XXx::xxx:xxxxXXX::xxY.xxxxgxxxrxxx'XX%::xxx:xXX::xxx::X%X::%. ;XxScx x•• %%XxxxX%%% xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx XXxx7Gx XXx%xXX XXx XxX%x:t%X7C%7Cx7L%xxxx %Xxx xxxxXXXx Y:xXXXXXx Xxx%XxxxXxx Xxx k%XxxxX Xxx%74%x XX xxx Y.7Gx%7GxxxxxXXX%Xc XXXxxxxcxx.X7G%Y.xxx%Y.% Xx% ••Xxx:: ::,fix::Xxx::xxx:x::74::74.:x::x::x122%.:%:: :: 2:x:' .: X':x::X: '12%•2X.• :•x•• 'xxxx}:%xxxx x72::XXX:%%%X:xxx::x72:{::xXx::x Y.t .X:. ¢ xAVE :: x: f�. • .1:,.. .:x x ::� %XXxxXx%%% xxxxxx%%xxxx : XXx X%X% 'X•G% x72 XXX % XX%% X%XXXxX XX XX XX XX % is LXXX X 'X X .xXX%XX XXX% ::x::X::X::x:2x2 X::%::X..:...72::X::7.. :::12x2:•{::x::X::%12.x.'%..%12:x'2. •v.. ...... .. .. .. 2. .. 22x2 % X:: :'x:: 1212 X � ::x:'%:f%::% ' .C%.:.%%� 21'42. %lKxY.:<•%%XiiX .X72 x xxXx?. %� XxxxX%%XXX Xxx%xXX%XXX7@ X:-. xxXx Xxx:SX •%••%.h......:cc.. %.'X.A.c 222-..X.%.'x..X::x 22x::X::% 22 222 x::X::xxx::X::X::%:%122x::%....X..'.. 4 v'•%::x::X... 'rL:G-x%228:xxx:: :•X•' %% %x% X%% X%%::%% '4%%''� %%X%%112 X.0}'% :74 }:.xxxx%X%.CX XX%XX %% % xxx:X72%X%:i X7y4x X%X %XXX %XX%%%%%Y'4 K%% % Xx% xxx Y. ' Xx •• �'%%.%x%XTOr X %%%X%%%X} .0%XX%x>x%xXXXXXXX�% 12%X2-.. x x72%XY.X..Y ccxx h usi 7 t yy ..%..x..x..x x::x:::{ K::} ra x ....4Y}. 0 '. {:: .: /��7C :44 y�f7�C (/y 't yet(% XxxxX%%%X% x%122X'7x12 2 -<xXX ...:.....<r.,r,n% h :'x72%h%%%%X %, .....%%xY%X% .. ..%�.. .�:•..G.'�i!X •�.x. .�. ..©.7.cc �.}.�.",RX "T :lG:: •"""' %XxXY.%X%:XXXXxxXX.%%%X%X74xXXXccx%xxx%XXX x%x%XJ•' "X x%.272%%.2%X%:XXX•' ...x:... -n '±XX::XXX:XX%::X2,1WM 722:%:..... K:::...{..X%%:.xXX::X%x:2747476::XXX::%XxxxX%•• _ 74 k.:%X%%% %% .%XXX%%%XXX % ,..xX%X%XkXr %xXXXX%Xxx XX?: v. . � Gx %g X4 J` f XxXXXXXxxxX::XXX:XxxxX} ...C':%xXXXXXX%.., 'XX.XXXc}XXXXxxxXXX "x%%::XXx::XXxc ::x::x::X::X::x ..Q' {{:��y,JX•L . �r}r'X;j 7�'y76,��%7 . X x % ::c... x XX%%xXX%xxXXXx::xX%X''72xxxxcX%xxxx%xXX %%X%xh..n XY.X}:XXX%%%.XXX.• '"X xh0�4J:A C}LM 7�L M xcCl:i�lc� IS X x % % % xXx%%%%%%% -. 7. ...x::X::%::h..:C::%::X:.%::X::%:.X::X::X::x::%..%..v..%:.%::%::%::%::%::%:x122 x122% % Y 12x2.. X. -:"' xXx ::Xxx::xxx::xxx%Xxx:,cxx::xxx::74%XXx%x::74%%%xxxx%%% xxxx%%,.: �:222x%. %72::X%%:::{;{{L%f.:...:5 ..X%%..X%X::XXX::XXX::%%:{12:%XX:%%%::x •X:."12x2:%X.'.:',%:.22}12%%::%X%::%Y:{:'%%%::%%%::%% .. .. t. ...,, .. v .. :x xY.%Yv+•xxx:, x:LxxX:::xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx X.+'•" :,:...\XXX?:X•F.:Cxxxxx%%X%XxxxX%%%X XXXXXXXx-XXXX.xxxx%xx:xxx::X72 XXx: 72X• :=722:%2:X2:X:Y":::C::x::%:::C::X::X::72:.M..:. .. .. .. .. .. .. %xXx XX%XXX%X:.:"x72%%XXX%%XXX %XX%%x%%%x x' :{` :XXX%X:{xXX%X%X%%X%%h<X%76%X1.%X%%Xx Xx xXX%%X7Gxxx%%xxxx'xXx K XXXMv X%7CX"••••• ........... •••••••..... •%..72..X..%."x.:x..:...x..:G..X:Lx..xxccxx:.X:2xxxxx::X % -.':'.::4•:x::xxccx:c::X:%::X %.%%:L.'%XX':X%%.:%%X {X X%% x72 XxX:: %%::%%X::%x%122%X%::...v%.:xxx:.xxiC::Xxx 'x. :XXX:XXX:C74747-.cc xXXrix%XXXXXXXXXXX:GXXX:C%XXX,XX%xxx XxxxXXx% Y. "x%X %x74%xcx%XxY.X%:L%x.. .'.......r ......"""`:h. '{Xx::X:47422X%72::72 %2:X7672:•%XX::XXX::% ::xXX::xxx::%.:X::xx%::x74•..: •r'{ ., ..%XX%% `?%XX%'MIL%xXX%k: V.. .%..: 2222 a%x.'. ..%%X127 SXk. xYX%x=xxxxxxxxx..„ %x XXXxxxxxx!!xxxx .2%22X::74:2%2:% Y %:76::Y % % X.X yyy n, %% Xxx%XxxXXX% xxYxx% .x o n i C1 nV2 ► 7� '� � 3 .X �• x eac•� ° )i st r i ct in %X%X%X%%%%XX x .xXX%%X%%%%% ........•x72x72:X72 .. .. .. iC} .n .. : .. xxxx% ••• YXX%Y XX%%%%%%%XX%%%XXX%%, +'✓'•.'�••{:L'r::;X%%XXX r.%XX%%%%XXX %%XX%%xXX %:. •• +: ..x..xcx..x % X.:%::X77%::X::x::x:x::x::Y•" ...X..... •:x::x:::{: > 4.:7222X:: :X::x::X::X:: ::x::x:: •12%:2%::x:: ':72%x':%:" %•.. f.M..x. %%• X7477: v.. .. %x%X%x%Y%XxxxxxXxxxxxxxXxXXx XX %}' Y .,' :• A •"x '• %x72%X}%XXx%X%%Y.X%%XXX%%X%%XXX% xXx .•:i •:.:,::.....:, e n t a&� x x44,xhW : X g G X prove m e ri t program XXxyxxxXXXxxXXxxXXxxXXxXxX %::X::72XX...:X::xxXxxcxxXxY.::%::X::"22%x%12: hxX%XXX%%XXx:Gsx..X%XXX 7'xxx xXX%74%Xhxx XX:..XXxxxx747474xx xxXx Xx74:GXX%XXXX%:LXXX%-.c. K' 'Sx:.:124xxX:%%XXxxXx 2:X2::XXMXXxx .:.0:72x::XXX:' X X% .:XXX' X:: X :: X%': t •• .XXX%%X%X%Y r: .:� XXXXXX i x%72:xxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX%v J x::%::74::X:::6• • • {1 •• .y G %xxxx%X:%%xxx xxxxXx%%X%x72 }: { F• XXXXXXXXYv "# 1212 ' ' _ X:12%::%:.%::}:..Y.:%:.x::72..%::%::X::X::%:::.• .- :. % . .72x::%Xx::xXX::74%x::%xx..xXx.:XXx:x72%::xxx::xXx::x%X -%x:^::CX::xXx::x%12%%%2%%x::%%%2:%7272::x}:• •• XF XXX XXX%-%xXX%XxxXxXXxx%XxxxXXXx%XX x%X%Xxxx%xxXx::'.%xxxxxxxcX%Xx7:7CXx Xxxx%Xxx74xxXx7 x xxxxxF :::.::x::722:%::%:x::x::%::x::74::%:2%:2x2:x::72..x::X:272::x::x::X:X::x2:x::x::X::X::x...:....72 .• .' :%%%%XXX%x%Y Y:{'{ %.%<%72"X% x::x::x:•x•x x x x } y 2%22x:. 7xXxxxxx� 72x-xxxx•%h x ::xY.x.:. r x xrx xxx.:xx:t:: %..X..%..X::X::%::X::Y.:XX::%:'%2272::X:'Y 'x::xxxxxxx xxx::=xxxx76xcx •'%:-y-X%xXX Xxx:xxxx%xxxx%%xxxxxxxxxxcxxx72 xxxXxxx.%xx.%Y.vxxcxxxx:6}676Y.;Xxx%XX%x72%%%xxxxxxx x..:...n. r::X..xxx:X: . x:272::72:.x..%..x.:x:0xxxxx.:X::72:: XX:•. %::X74%:XXx::%X=XXXXXxx.:XXX=X%2:7474'X.2%7274:X%%::xXX .'Y ....XXX:.%XX:2x%3%%%2:21X%2 XXx2:XXx::%X, AX::XXX2:XXxxXXX22Xx%:Lec% MK %%%:'x72%::%%%::%%X:'%%%:: xxxx%%.%% Y:XX^:YLxXX.X Xxxxxxx%%%xx % x xx%% xx XxxxX% % % X 22..2% %%XxxxX%% % Xx%%XxxxX% xxx%XxxxX: n%XxxxX%%:GxXX%%XXx% % y.i+. ,.r..v.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..%%%%%%x%%%%%%%XX%xxx%% City of Tigard 2018 TCAC Draft Goals • Develop a strong knowledge base of the Tigard Triangle to inform our recommendations for the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Implementation Project. • Participate in educational and planning activities that result from the SW Corridor Project to inform our recommendations to regional and local government entities • Identify and prioritize opportunities for development to improve walkability, equity, and connectivity across both urban renewal districts • Explore ways that policy changes can encourage and support the building of affordable housing and equitable business development. City Center Urban Renewal Plan Tax Increment/ Indebtedness $22,000,000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $20,000,000 ::: :$2,853,979 : : Unrealized TIF • . . . . . . . . . . . . $18,000,000 $16,000,000 $5,000,000 2026 Borrowing $14,000,000 ._. $12,000,000 $18,636,313 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 2019 Borrowing $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,782,3344111 Pay as you go TIF $2,000,000 Indebtedness Used $3,363,687 $3,363,687 $0 2008-2017 2027(Projected) City Center Urban Renewal Plan Capital Expenditures FY2008-FY2017 ($6,663,339) $95,518 1% $110,133 2% $1,275,604 19% ■ Infrastructure/Public $1,977,895 Space 30% Property Improvement Property Acquisition ■Administration $3,204,189 48% Percent Change - Assessed Value of Taxable Property (2006-2016) 60% 55% 50% 45% 4y, 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% ■ City Center UR District ■ City of Tigard SUPPLEMENTAL ACK 2O FOR y (DATE OFEETING) r City ofTigard Resp cWWI , t and Cate i Do the litght Thou;i Get aDo TCDA/TCAC Joint Meeting prIlta , , Cm ofTigard Agenda • Introductions • City Staff Opening Remarks • 2017 Annual Report of the TCAC • 2017 Recommendations for TCAC • 2018 TCAC Draft Goals • Discussion 1 3/7/2018 City Center Urban Renewal Plan Tax Increment/ Indebtedness $22,000,000 $20,000,000 $2,853,979 Unrealized TIF $18,000,000 $16,000,000 $5,600,000 2026 Borrowing $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 2019 Borrowing $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 Pay as you go TIF $2,000,000 Indebtedness Used $0 2008-2017 2027(Projected) City Center Urban Renewal Plan Capital Expenditures FY2008-FY2017($6,663,339) 595,518 1% $110,133 2% 51,275 80.5 19% - - ■Infrastructure/Public $1,977,895 Space 30% U Property Improvement n Property Acquisition •Administration $3,204,189 48% 2 3/7/2018 Percent Change -Assessed Value of Taxable Property (2006-2016) 60% 55% 50% 45% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% •City Center UR District ■City of Tigard Cit nJ I i�ard 2017 Annual Report of the TCAC Urban Rene Plan Goal 1.Support URA Project Infrastructure& r.r;1 J► - .. Development • '.' t Goal 2. Monitor Mid/Long-term projects located * °a `.%;" downtown and/or likely to have impacts on downtown c,r,(enu 'Urban 9(enew.nl Goal 3.Communications&Engagement Goal 4.Walking&Parking Focus 3 3/7/2018 rte. City ofTigard 2017 Recommendations for Town Center Development Agenc • Light public trails that lead into Downtown and prioritize trail lighting for identified segments of the Fanno Creek Trail within the city center urban renewal district • Implement Phase 2 of the public parking management plan for the city center for employee parking in the next year&Phase 3 for permitting within the following 2 years • Proactively seek opportunities to acquire and consolidate land over the next 2 years for the development of public spaces and ensure a range of housing options, including affordable housing,are available for Tigard residents and families • Continue investments of$50,000-$100,000 for each district in improvement assistance such as the facade improvement program & strolling street grants Cites ofTigard 2018 TCAC Draft Goals • Develop a strong knowledge base of the Tigard Triangle to inform our recommendations for the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Implementation Project. • Continue to participate in educational and planning activities that result from the SW Corridor Project to inform our recommendations to regional and local government entities • Identify and prioritize opportunities for development to improve walkability,equity,and connectivity across both urban renewal districts • Explore ways that policy changes can encourage and support the building of affordable housing and equitable business development. 4 AIS-3392 6. Business Meeting One Meeting Date: 03/06/2018 Length (in minutes): 25 Minutes Agenda Title: System Development Charge Code Amendments Prepared For: Susan Shanks Submitted By: Susan Shanks, Community Development Item Type: Ordinance Meeting Type: Council Business Meeting - Main Public Hearing No Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE Shall the City Council approve amendments to Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 3.24 System Development Charge (SDC) Program to clarify and improve program administration. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends approval of the attached Ordinance that repeals and replaces TMC Chapter 3.24. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY In April and May of 2015, Council adopted amendments to TMC Chapter 3.24, Transportation and Park SDCs, and related SDC Methodology Reports through Ordinance 15-08 and 15-09. To assist with the implementation of these and other city SDCs, an SDC Administrative Procedures Guide was also adopted in 2015 through Resolution 15-15. In the course of administering the newly adopted SDCs and their implementing documents consistent with council policy direction, staff noted inconsistencies and procedural gaps among the various documents and in the city's administrative practices. To address these issues, management created an interdepartmental SDC workgroup in 2016 with representatives from Finance, Public Works, Community Development and the City Attorney's Office with the goal of refining and clarifying the existing adopted documents and related practices. The SDC workgroup recommended a discrete package of code amendments to address three time-sensitive development issues related to River Terrace development and citywide multifamily development. In June 2016, Council adopted these amendments through Ordinance 16-10. In August 2016, the SDC workgroup membership was revised to manage the ongoing work more efficiently and expertly, and Tiberius Solutions LLC, a public finance consultant with expertise in SDCs, was brought on board to assist staff. In August 2017, the SDC workgroup briefed Council on the work to date and solicited Council direction on a number of policy issues. The proposed amendments are a culmination of extensive research and discussion and incorporate Council's policy direction. As a reminder, the key policy changes proposed for adoption are as follows: •Allow SDC credits for pedestrian and bicycle projects that further the city's goals for walkability and connectivity, regardless of whether the improvements meet the strict statutory definition of a "qualified public improvement." •Allow SDC credits for park projects that are consistent with the city's master plan standards and identified needs for parks, regardless of whether the improvements meet the strict statutory definition of a "qualified public improvement." •Allow deferral of payment until occupancy of Park SDCs by multifamily development for the same reason that Transportation SDCs are currently allowed to be deferred by multifamily development. •Allow exemption from payment of SDCs for regulated affordable housing developments. The proposed code language would define regulated affordable housing as housing that is made affordable through public subsidies or statutory regulations that restrict or limit resident income levels or rents. Similar exemptions have been enacted in cities across Oregon including, but not limited to, Portland, Bend, Salem, Hood River, and Manzanita. It should be noted that the proposed amendments do not modify any adopted SDC Methodology or SDC amount. If adopted, staff will update the SDC Administrative Procedures Guide and revise the SDC Project Lists consistent with the new code provisions. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Council could direct staff to modify the proposed amendments. Council could also reject all or portions of the proposed amendments, which would mean that existing provisions of TMC Chapter 3.24 would continue to apply. COUNCIL OR TCDA GOALS, POLICIES, MASTER PLANS Tigard Municipal Code Chapter 3.24 Park System Master Plan Trail System Master Plan Transportation System Plan River Terrace Funding Strategy DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION 08/22/2017 — Staff briefed Council on proposed amendments to TMC Chapter 3.24. Council approved documents and code amendments related to the city's System Development Charge Program on: 06/17/2016 — Ordinance 16-10 05/19/2015 — Ordinance 15-09 04/28/2015 — Ordinance 15-08; Resolution 15-15 Fiscal Impact Cost: NA Budgeted (yes or no): NA Where Budgeted (department/program):NA Additional Fiscal Notes: A policy to exempt regulated affordable housing may, if utilized, result in the city forgoing an indeterminate amount of capital improvement fund revenue, in exchange for removing a financial barrier to develop affordable housing. Attachments SDC Code Amendments Ordinance CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 18- AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REPLACING TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 3.24 REGARDING SYS'1'EM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES TO CLARIFY PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION WHEREAS, in early 2015, Tigard City Council substantially amended Tigard Municipal Code Chapter 3.24 related to transportation and parks system development charges (SDCs) as well as adopted corresponding SDC methodology reports;and WHEREAS, since that time, staff from several departments with roles in the administration of the SDC program including Finance, Public Works, Community Development, and the City Attorney—have worked to identify administrative issues with the adopted documents and developed recommendations;and WHEREAS, in August 2016, Council directed staff to incorporate additional policy direction into the City's code, specifically related to allowing additional credits beyond what is required for qualified public improvements and allowing an exemption for city transportation and park SDCs where the project meets certain criteria as a regulated affordable housing development;and WHEREAS, the adopted transportation and park SDC methodology reports state that the city "may exempt specific classes of development from the requirement to pay SDCs"as a matter of policy;and WHEREAS,there is an identified need for affordable housing in the city and the proposed exemption removes a financial barrier to the development of more affordable housing;and WHEREAS, the proposed code provides for the efficient administration of the city's SDC program and advances the city's goals for walkability,connectivity,and livability. NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Chapter 3.24 of the Tigard Municipal Code is hereby repealed,in its entirety, and replaced to read as shown on the attached Exhibit A. SECTION 2: If any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application,and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are severable. This City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion thereof and intends that the invalid portions should be severed and the balance of the ordinance be enforced. SECTION 3: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the council, signature by the mayor,and posting by the city recorder. ORDINANCE No. 18- Page 1 PASSED: By vote of all council members present after being read by number and title only,this day of ,2018. Carol A. Krager,City Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this day of ,2018. John L.Cook,Mayor Approved as to form: City Attorney Date ORDINANCE No. 18- Page 2 Exhibit A TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE Chapter 3.24 SYSTEM connection to a capital improvement. The DEVELOPMENT SDCs created and imposed by this chapter are CHARGE PROGRAM separate from, and in addition to, any applicable tax, assessment, charge, fee in lieu Sections: of assessment, or fee otherwise provided by law or imposed as a condition of development. 3.24.010 Purpose The SDC Administrative Procedures Guide 3.24.020 System Development provides additional detail on implementation Charge of SDCs. 3.24.030 Definitions 3.24.040 Charge Imposed 3.24.030 Definitions 3.24.050 Methodology 3.24.060 Project List For purposes of this chapter, the following 3.24.070 Expenditures definitions apply: 3.24.080 Payment 3.24.090 Installment Payments "Administrator"means the person, or persons, 3.24.100 Exemptions appointed by the city to manage and implement 3.24.110 Credits the SDC program or portions thereof. 3.24.120 Notice 3.24.130 Accounting "Applicant"means the person who applies for 3.24.140 Appeals a land use decision or building permit. 3.24.150 Prohibited Connection 3.24.160 Penalty "Building official" means the person, or 3.24.170 Severability designee, certified by the state and designated as such to administer the state building codes 3.24.010 Purpose for the city. This chapter is intended to implement the "Building permit" means the permit issued by authority provided in ORS 223.297 through a building official, as required by the State of 223.314 by adopting and imposing system Oregon Structural Specialty Code Section development charges (SDCs) to pay for the 105.1 or the Oregon Residential Specialty installation, construction, extension, and Code Section 105.1. In addition, "building expansion of the city's water, sanitary sewer, permit" means a manufactured home stormwater, park, and transportation systems. installation permit issued by the building The purpose of SDCs is to impose a portion of official, relating to the placement of the cost of capital improvements for these manufactured homes in the city. systems upon those developments that create the need for or increase the demands on these "Capital improvements" mean facilities, real systems. (Ord. 15-08 §2) property,or assets used for the following: 3.24.020 System Development 1. Water: supply, treatment, or Charge distribution; An SDC is a reimbursement fee, an 2. Sanitary sewer: wastewater collection, improvement fee, or a combination thereof transmission,treatment,or disposal; imposed on a subject property at the time of increased usage of a capital improvement or 3-24-1 Code Update:3/18 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE 3. Stormwater: water quality or quantity past 18 months prior to the date of application management,drainage,or flood control; for a building permit,or land use decision if no building permit is required. Where the subject 4. Parks: active or passive parks, open property was used simultaneously for several space,or recreational trails;or different uses (mixed-use) then all of the specific use categories will be considered for 5. Transportation. purposes of this chapter. Where the previous use was composed of a primary use with one or "City"means the City of Tigard,Oregon. more ancillary uses that supported the primary use and were owned and operated in common, "Condition of development approval" means the primary use will be deemed to be the sole any requirement imposed on an applicant by previous use of the subject property for the city or county as part of a land use decision purposes of this chapter. or building permit approval. "Project list"means the list adopted by the city "County"means Washington County,Oregon. pursuant to Section 3.24.060. "Credit" means the amount by which an "Proposed use"means the use proposed by the applicant may be able to reduce an SDC as applicant for the subject property. Where the provided in this chapter. applicant proposes several different uses (mixed-use) then all of the specific use "Development"means a building or other land categories will be considered for purposes of construction, including a physical change in this chapter. Where the proposed use is the use of a structure or land, in a manner composed of a primary use with one or more which increases the demand on or creates the ancillary uses that support the primary need for new or enlarged capital proposed use and are owned and operated in improvements. common,the primary use will be deemed to be the sole proposed use of the subject property "Duplex" means two attached single-family for purposes of this chapter. residential dwelling units on a single lot. "Qualified public improvement" means any "Improvement fee" means the SDC for costs capital improvement that increases the capacity associated with capital improvements to be of the city's system and is: constructed. 1. Required as a condition of "Multifamily housing" means three or more development approval; attached residential dwelling units located on a single lot. 2. Identified as a need and included on the project list; and "Over-capacity"means that portion of a capital improvement that is built larger or with greater 3. Not located on or contiguous to the capacity than is necessary to serve the subject property; or development or to mitigate for system impacts attributable to the development. 4. Located contiguous to or in whole or in part on the subject property and, in the "Previous use" means the most intensive use opinion of the administrator,is required to conducted at the subject property within the be built larger or with greater capacity 3-24-2 Code Update:3/18 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE (over-capacity) than is necessary to serve "SDC Administrative Procedures Guide" the development of the subject property or means the administrative rules adopted by the to mitigate for system impacts attributable city for the implementation of this chapter. to the development of the subject property. There is a rebuttable presumption that "Single-family dwelling unit" means one improvements built to the city's minimum detached residential dwelling unit, or one-half standards are required to serve the of a duplex,or one row house. development and to mitigate for system impacts attributable to the development. 3.24.040 Charge Imposed "Regulated affordable housing" means A. SDCs may be established and revised by housing that is made affordable through public resolution of the city council. The resolution subsidies or statutory regulations that restrict must include the amount of the charge;the type or limit resident income levels or rents. To be of permit to which the charge applies; the considered regulated affordable housing,units methodology used to set the amount of the must: charge; and, if the charge applies to a geographic area smaller than the entire city,the 1. Have a local, state, or federal geographic area subject to the charge. compliance agreement or contract; B. Unless otherwise exempted by the 2. Be affordable to households at or provisions of this chapter or any other below 80% Median Family Income as applicable local or state law,an SDC is hereby defined annually by Housing and Urban imposed upon all development within the city Development (HUD) for the Portland- or outside the city boundaries pursuant to an Vancouver Metropolitan Statistical Area intergovernmental agreement. SDCs are (MSA); and imposed where development makes a connection to the city's systems or where 3. Remain regulated affordable housing development increases the demand on the units for a minimum of 20 years from the city's systems. date of occupancy. C. Any fee imposed or required to be paid, "Reimbursement fee"means the SDC for costs assessed, or collected as part of a local associated with capital improvements already improvement district or in lieu of a local constructed,or under construction when the fee improvement district assessment,or the cost of is established, for which the city determines complying with requirements or conditions that capacity exists. imposed by a building permit or land use decision, are separate from and in addition to "Residential dwelling unit" means a building SDCs and may not be used as a credit against or a portion of a building consisting of one or any SDC. more rooms that includes sleeping, cooking, and plumbing facilities and are arranged and 3.24.050 Methodology designed as permanent living quarters for one family or household. A. The city will adopt an SDC methodology by resolution of the city council for each SDC "Row house"means an attached single-family imposed. The methodology establishes the residential dwelling unit on a single lot. improvement fee or reimbursement fee and the method for calculating a development's 3-24-3 Code Update:3/18 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE proportional share of the city's capital 3.24.060 Project List improvement costs. A. The project list adopted by city council B. The methodology used to establish the must: reimbursement fee must be based on ratemaking principles employed to finance 1. List the capital improvement projects publicly-owned capital improvements; prior that may be funded with improvement contributions by existing system users; gifts or fees; and grants from federal or state government or private persons; the value of unused capacity 2. List the estimated cost, percentage of available to future system users; the cost of costs eligible for improvement fee funding, existing capital improvements; or other and timing of construction for each capital relevant factors identified by the city council. improvement project. Future system users will contribute an equitable share of the cost of existing capital B. The administrator may,at any time,amend improvements. the project list, including adding or removing projects or changing the estimated cost, C. The methodology used to establish the percentage of cost eligible for improvement fee improvement fee must be based on the funding, or timing of construction for each projected cost of capital improvements capital improvement project on the list. identified in the project list adopted pursuant to Amendments must be consistent with the city's Section 3.24.060 that are needed to increase the adopted goals, policies, and system master capacity of the system to which the fee is plans or as otherwise determined by the related and for which the need for increased administrator to be necessary for the public's system capacity will be required to serve the health,safety,and welfare. demands placed on the system by future system users. C. If an SDC will be increased by a proposed project list amendment to include a capacity- D. The methodology may also provide for increasing capital improvement, the city must periodic indexing of system development provide notice of the proposed amendment to charges for inflation,as long as the index is: the persons who have requested written notice under Section 3.24.120 at least 30 days prior to 1. A relevant measurement of the average the adoption of the proposed amendment. The change in prices or costs over an identified city will hold a public hearing if a written time period for materials, labor, real request for a hearing on the proposed property or a combination of the three; amendment is received at least 7 days prior to the date the proposed amendment is scheduled 2. Published by a recognized for adoption. organization or agency that produces the index or data source for reasons that are 3.24.070 Expenditures independent of the system development charge methodology;and A. Reimbursement Fees.Reimbursement fees may be spent only on capital improvements to 3. Incorporated as part of the established which the fees are related, including methodology or identified and adopted in a expenditures relating to repayment of separate ordinance,resolution or order. indebtedness. 3-24-4 Code Update:3/18 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE B. Improvement Fees. 1. Calculation. SDCs are calculated based on the fees in effect at the time of 1. Improvement fees may be spent only submittal of the complete building or on capacity-increasing capital plumbing permit application to which the improvements to which the fees are fees relate. If a building or plumbing related, including expenditures relating to permit is not required and a land use repayment of indebtedness. A capital decision is required, SDCs are calculated improvement increases capacity when it based on the fees in effect at the time of increases the level of performance or submittal of the complete land use service provided by an existing facility or application to which the fees relate. provides a new facility. The portion of the improvement funded by the improvement 2. Due and payable.Water SDCs are due fee must be related to the need for and payable upon purchase of a water increased capacity to provide service for meter.All other SDCs are due and payable future users. upon issuance of the building or plumbing permit to which the fees relate. If a 2. A capital improvement funded in building or plumbing permit is not required whole or in part by an improvement fee and a land use decision is required, all must be included on the project list other SDCs are due and payable upon adopted by the city pursuant to Section issuance of the land use decision to which 3.24.060. the fees relate. 3. Notwithstanding Subsections B.1 and B. The city may not issue a required building B.2 of this section, SDCs may be spent on permit or allow a connection to the city's the costs of complying with the provisions systems until all applicable SDCs have been of this chapter, including the costs of paid in full; deferral has been approved developing SDC methodologies and pursuant to Section 3.24.080.D;exemption has providing an annual accounting of SDC been granted pursuant to Section 3.24.100; or funds. installment payment arrangements have been made pursuant to Section 3.24.090. C. SDCs may not be spent on the following: C. If development commences or a 1. Costs associated with the construction connection is made to the city's water,sanitary of administrative office facilities that are sewer, or stormwater systems without the more than an incidental part of a capital required building permit or land use approval, improvement; or all applicable SDCs will be immediately due and payable. 2. Costs associated with the operation or routine maintenance of capital D. Notwithstanding Subsection A.2 of this improvements. section, the applicant may apply for a deferral of payment of transportation or park SDCs to 3.24.080 Payment occupancy.The administrator may only grant a deferral in cases where the amount due exceeds A. SDCs are calculated and are due and the amount of a transportation or park SDC on payable as follows: a single-family dwelling unit.The request must be made in writing to the administrator no later 3-24-5 Code Update:3/18 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE than the time of building permit application or, 3.24.100 Exemptions if no building permit is required, then upon land use application. Any deferred SDC must The following types of development are be paid in full prior to the issuance of an exempt from payment of SDCs: occupancy permit. The amount of transportation or park SDC due on deferred A. Structures and uses existing on or before obligation will be the amount in effect at the the effective date of the resolution that sets the time of issuance of the building permit. amount of an SDC, except for connections to the city's water or sanitary sewer systems made 3.24.090 Installment Payments after such date. A. When an SDC is due and payable, the B. Additions to single-family dwelling units applicant may apply for payment in 20 semi- that do not constitute the addition of a dwelling annual installments, secured by a lien on the unit, as defined by the building code adopted property upon which the development is to pursuant to TMC 14.04. occur or to which the utility connection is to be made, to include the SDC along with the C. Alterations, additions, replacements or following: changes in use that do not increase the development's use of a capital improvement. 1. Interest on the obligation at the rate stated in the city's master fees and charges. D. Regulated affordable housing, from city If no rate is set, then the interest on the transportation and park SDCs only. obligation will default to prime rate as published by the Wall Street Journal the 3.24.110 Credits day of application plus four percent; and A. Reimbursement fee credits.No credits may 2. Any and all costs,as determined by the be given for reimbursement fees. administrator, incurred by the city in establishing payment schedules and B. Improvement fee credits. The following administering the collections process. activities are eligible for improvement fee credits: B. An applicant requesting installment payments has the burden of demonstrating the 1. Change of use. Credits will be issued applicant's authority to assent to the imposition in an amount equal to the existing SDC of a lien on the property and that the property attributable to the previous use when a interest of the applicant is adequate to secure change of use occurs. The credit so payment of the lien. computed may not exceed the calculated SDC. The applicant is not entitled to a C. The administrator will record the lien with refund if an SDC for the proposed use is the county as a lien on the property for the less than the same SDC attributable to the amount of the SDC together with the costs in previous use. Previous use credits will be Subsections A.1 and A.2 of this section. The automatically calculated and applied by lien is enforceable in the manner provided in the administrator. ORS Chapter 223 and is superior to all other liens pursuant to ORS 223.230. 2. Property donation. Credits will be issued in an amount up to the county market value of real property donated to 3-24-6 Code Update:3/18 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE the city for a future park improvement that needs or agreements associated with the is on the project list. In lieu of county improvement. market value, the city may require a written appraisal as the basis for 2. Credit requests must be filed in writing determining value at the discretion of the with the administrator on forms provided administrator. Real property donations by the city no later than 60 days after become eligible for credits upon recording acceptance of the improvement by the city, of the signed deed with the county. with the exception of change of use credits as described in Subsection 3.24.110.B.1 3. Capital improvement construction. above. Credits will be issued for certain capital improvements as described in Subsection 3. When construction of a capital 3.24.110.E below. improvement gives rise to a credit amount greater than the improvement fee that C. General provisions for improvement fee would otherwise be levied against the credits. Improvement fee credits are subject to development, the excess credit may be the following: applied against improvement fees that accrue in subsequent phases of the 1. Credits must be used within 10 years development,if any. from the date the credit is issued. Credits expire after 10 years without the need for E. Eligible capital improvements. The any further action by the city. following types of capital improvements are eligible for improvement fee credits: 2. Credits may be transferable from one development to another. 1. Qualified public improvement.Credits for a qualified public improvement, other 3. Credits may only be used for than a park improvement,will be issued for obligations relating to the specific SDC for the actual cost of the improvement as which the credit was issued. approved by the administrator. Credits for a qualified public improvement will be D. Improvement fee credits for capital issued only for the cost of that portion of improvements. In addition to the provisions in the improvement that exceeds the city's Subsection 3.24.110.0 above, improvement minimum standard facility size or capacity fee credits for capital improvements are subject needed to serve the development. The to the following: applicant has the burden of demonstrating that a particular improvement is a qualified 1. Credits will only be issued for an public improvement. eligible bonded or completed capital improvement, or for a fee paid in lieu of 2. Park improvement. Credits for a park construction of an eligible capital improvement on the project list,regardless improvement, for the specific SDC to of whether the improvement is considered which the improvement relates. A a qualified public improvement, will be completed capital improvement becomes issued for up to the full cost of the eligible for credits upon final inspection improvement. Credits are limited to costs and conditional acceptance by the city, approved by the administrator based on regardless of any ongoing maintenance park size and features. 3-24-7 Code Update:3/18 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE 3. Bicycle and pedestrian improvement. least 60 days prior to the first hearing on the Credits for a bicycle or pedestrian proposal. The failure of a person on the list to improvement on the project list,regardless receive a notice that was mailed does not of whether the improvement is considered invalidate the city's subsequent action. a qualified public improvement, will be issued for up to the full cost of the B. The city may periodically remove persons improvement. Credits are limited to costs from the notification list.At least 30 days prior approved by the administrator based on to removing a person from the list, the city facility size and materials. must notify the person that a new written request for notification is required if the person F. Relationship between Transportation wishes to remain on the notification list. Development Tax and SDC credits. For any transportation capital improvement that is C. A change in the amount of a eligible for credits from both county reimbursement fee or improvement fee is not Transportation Development Tax (TDT) and an amendment of the SDC or SDC city transportation SDC, the amount of SDC methodology if the change in amount is based credit issued will be reduced by the amount of on a change in cost of materials, labor or real TDT credit issued. property as set forth on the project list adopted pursuant to Section 3.24.060 or the periodic G. Relationship between citywide and application of one or more specific cost indices overlay SDC credits. For any transportation published by a recognized organization or capital improvement that is eligible for credits agency and is incorporated as part of the from both a citywide and overlay SDC, the established methodology or identified and amount of overlay SDC credit issued will be adopted in a separate ordinance,resolution, or reduced by the amount of citywide SDC credit order. issued. 3.24.130 Accounting H. In addition to Subsection 3.24.110.E.1 above, credits will be issued in an amount of A. The city will utilize standard accounting up to half the cost of any non-qualified public practices to segregate all SDCs into separate improvement street elements of River Terrace capital improvement system funds, and keep Boulevard. Credits are limited to costs such funds separate from all other city funds. approved by the administrator based on the adopted River Terrace Boulevard cross B. The city will provide an annual accounting section. of all SDCs funds showing the total amount of all SDC revenues collected for each type of 3.24.120 Notice system and expended for each capital improvement or other costs allowed by this A. The city will maintain a list of persons who chapter. have made a written request for notification prior to adoption or amendment of any SDC or 3.24.140 Appeals SDC methodology. Written notice will be mailed to persons on the list at least 90 days A person may file an appeal in writing for the prior to the first hearing to establish or modify following actions or decisions: an SDC or SDC methodology. The methodology supporting the adoption or A. Appeal of an expenditure. Appeal of an amendment of an SDC must be available at SDC expenditure must be filed with the city 3-24-8 Code Update:3/18 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE within two years of the date of the alleged been incorporated herein. It is hereby declared improper expenditure. The city council will to be the city council's intent that this chapter determine whether the expenditure was in would have been adopted had such an accordance with this chapter and the provisions unconstitutional provision not been included of ORS 223.297 to 223.314. If the city council herein. • determines that there was an improper SDC expenditure, the city council will direct that a sum equal to the misspent amount be deposited to the account or fund from which it was spent within one year of council's decision. B. Appeal of an SDC methodology.Appeal of an SDC methodology adopted by the city council pursuant to Section 3.24.050 must be filed no later than 60 days after the date of adoption and must be contested according to the procedure set forth in ORS 34.010 to 34.100. C. Appeal of other decisions. Appeals of other decisions, including calculation of an SDC charge or credit,must be filed with the city within 30 days of the administrator's decision that is being contested. The city council decides all such appeals. 3.24.150 Prohibited Connection No person may connect to the water, sanitary sewer,or stormwater systems of the city unless the applicable SDC has been paid. 3.24.160 Penalty Violation of this chapter is a Class A infraction punishable by a fine not to exceed$500.00. 3.24.170 Severability The provisions of this chapter are severable, and it is the intention to confer the whole or any part of the powers herein provided for. If any clause, section, or provision of this chapter is declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason or cause, the remaining portion of this chapter will be in full force and effect and be valid as if such invalid portion thereof had not 3-24-9 Code Update:3/18 AGENDA ITEM No. 6 Date: March 6, 2018 TESTIMONY SIGN-UP SHEETS Please sign on the following page(s) if you wish to testify before City Council on: Public Hearing — Consideration of System Development Charge Code Amendments — TMC Chapter 3.24 This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony become part of the public record and is openly available to all members of the public. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. Due to Time Constraints City Council May Impose A Time Limit on Testimony AGENDA ITEM No. 6 Date: March 6, 2018 PLEASE PRINT This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony become part of the public record and is openly available to all members of the public. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. Proponent—(Speaking In Favor) Opponent—(Speaking Against) Neutral Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. &1 Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. b3\ k C� AN o ?o x c)3)--0'4 j03 4e1 4103.11 ‘T-)-%) Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. P ♦ COMMUNITY PARTNERS P.O. Box 23206 * Tigard, OR 97281-3206 * cpahinc.org FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING Tel: 503.293.4038 * Fax: 503.293.4039 * TTY/VCO: 800.735.2900 March 6, 2018 SUPPLE E TAL PACKET City of Tigard ,AOR 13125 SW Hall Blvd., OF MEETING) Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: Letter of support for system development charge (SDC) exemptions for affordable housing Dear Mayor John L. Cook Council President Jason Snider Councilor John Goodhouse Councilor Tom Anderson Councilor Marc Woodard I am writing on behalf of Community Partners for Affordable Housing (CPAH) in support of the ordinance to repeal and replace Tigard Municipal Code Chapter 3.24 Regarding System Development Charges. System Development Charges have an enormous impact on the supply of affordable housing, adding costs and one more hurdle to the herculean challenge of financing new affordable communities. These charges can total nearly one million dollars for a single project, increasing the funding gap that a non- profit housing developer may not be able to fill. Although policy choices frequently balance multiple and conflicting needs, and we do understand the need for revenue to pay for crucial city services, we are also here to say that this change can make an important positive impact on the overall availability of affordable housing. As a non-profit housing developer focusing on low income and workforce housing, we also understand that the impact of increasing the availability of affordable housing achieves multiple, important, and ultimately cost-saving, outcomes. Finally, it has been about a year since community development staff presented Tigard Affordable Housing Strategies at city council. There were many elements of that report, and SDC waivers for affordable housing was a key recommendation made by staff. I want to thank staff and electeds for their work in moving this agenda forward. Sometimes plans sit on the shelf and that is all that happens. We very much appreciate your willingness to take action. We are lucky to be an organization that serves the city of Tigard. Thank you. / C1/1((L1 .JIU71) 14 Rachael Duke Executive Director CPAH does not discriminate against any person on the basis of age,race,color,religion,sex,sexual orientation or gender ini identity,disability(physical, mental or developmental),familial or marital status,or national origin,in admission or access to,or treatment of,residents,employees or volunteers in any of its projects or programs. OUALUNRY Eo°A`HoRY City of Tigard, Oregon Affidavit of Posting TIGARD In the Matter of the Proposed Ordinance(s) STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, K-_L LC1 y(Q_/ , being first duly sworn, by oath, depose and say: I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of Ordinance Number(s) which were adopted at the City Council meeting of 3/(o/oZ(5/Q , on the (0/' day of fl et.-r .'-i , 20 I . 1. Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, Oregon 2. Tigard Public Library, 13500 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, Oregon 3. Tigard Permit Center, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon Signature of erson who 11Yerforthed Posting Subscribed and sworn before me thisaWday of Sidein ber,20 I O by Wed C at.)--Tie"-1 • -Q, OFFICIAL STAMP gla/te-r/41-1 (5&..CAROLANN KRAGER Notary Public—State of Orego NOTARY PUBLIC•OREGON ; -'` COMMISSION NO.978701 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 18,2022 I:\ADM\CITY RECORDERS\FORMS\AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING-ORDINANCE.DOC