Loading...
City Council Packet - 02/06/2018 III17 City of Tigard Tigard Business Meeting—Agenda TIGARD oh TIGARD CITY COUNCIL , LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD AND TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING DATE AND TIME: February 6, 2018 - 6:30 p.m. Business Meeting MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard -Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Citizen Communication items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager. Times noted are estimated;it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda items can be heard in any order after 7:30 p.m. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 503-718-2419, (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-718-2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). SEE AFIACHED AGENDA VIEW LIVE VIDEO STREAMING ONLINE: http://live.tigard-or.gov CABLE VIEWERS: The regular City Council meeting is shown live on Channel 28 at 7:30 p.m. The meeting will be rebroadcast at the following times on Channel 28: Thursday 6:00 p.m. Sunday 11:00 a.m. Friday 10:00 p.m. Monday 6:00 a.m. City of Tigard Tigard Business Meeting—Agenda T IGARD 4 z ..c..v...�gv�m.... -�-«mac... ,.;. r 1: •.,:. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD AND TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING DATE AND TIME: February 6,2018 -6:30 p.m. Business Meeting MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard-Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 6:30 PM 1. BUSINESS MEETING A. Call to Order B. Roll Call C. Pledge of Allegiance D. Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 2. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION (Two Minutes or Less,Please) A. Follow-up to Previous Citizen Communication B. Citizen Communication—Sign Up Sheet 3. CONSENT AGENDA: (Tigard City Council) These items are considered routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion.Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: •ConsentAkenda-Items Removed for Separate Discussion:Any items requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion will be considered immediately after the Council/City Center Development Agency has voted on those items which do not need discussion. 4. CONSIDER RESOLUTION REAPPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE COMMITTEE FOR COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 6:30 p.m. estimated time 5. LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD - CONSIDER CONTRACT AWARD FOR SW WALL STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 6:35 p.m. estimated time 6. LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD - CONSIDER PURCHASE AWARD FOR JOHN DEERE UTILITY TRACTOR/MOWER 6:40 p.m. estimated time 7. DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION OF LOCAL OPTION LEVY REFERRAL 6:45 p.m. estimated time CONVENE TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY- 8. TCDA BOARD CONSIDERATION OF A MINOR AMENDMENT TO THE CITY CENTER URBAN RENEWAL PLAN 7:30 p.m. estimated time RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL- 9. CONSIDER RESOLUTION FOR LOCAL ADMINISTRATION OF VERTICAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ZONE 7:40 p.m. estimated time 10. NON AGENDA ITEMS 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION:The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session to discuss real property transaction negotiations,under ORS 192.660(2) (e). All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. 7:50 p.m. estimated time 12. ADJOURNMENT 8:05 p.m. estimated time AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 B - CITIZEN COMMUNICATION DATE: February 6, 2018 (Limited to 2 minutes or less,please) The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda and items on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony becomes part of the public record. The names and addresses ofpersons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. NAME,ADDRESS & PHONE TOPIC STAFF Please Print CONTACTED Name:iVcr t`1 Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: 331 f S& / t eeig Address ( ` �� G.� �S � ✓`'�- City 117,442o State O R Zip 7? Phone No. .5-61g -g3 2 - 2377 Name: "K Atti t 0 r+ Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Address Ss U C . . .L City TL ► `� State © Zip cl?a 3 Phone No. Name: Vet_r V1 G y-D4�� Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Address 11/33 9 5J L(1 go ( � City TZ 5 a-ral State 012 Zip q -2 a a Phone No. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION I\ADM\CITY RECORDERS\000 City Recorder-Records Resources and Policies\CCSignup\2018\citizen communication 180102.doc AIS-3385 4. Business Meeting One Meeting Date: 02/06/2018 Length (in minutes): 5 Minutes Agenda Title: CONSIDER RESOLUTION REAPPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE COMMITTEE FOR COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Submitted By: Carol Krager, Central Services Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Council Resolution Business Meeting - Main Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Shall Council appoint two new citizen representative members to the Committee for Community Engagement to fill two vacancies that opened in December 2017 and January 2018? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST The Committee for Community Engagement (CCE) is charged with oversight, accountability and policy direction on program design for citywide community engagement activities. There are 15 positions on the Committee for Community Engagement (CCE). Two positions are open because one member resigned when she moved to another state in December 2017 and one resigned in January 2018 because of new work schedule conflicts. Mayor John Cook and committee liaison Councilor Marc Woodard interviewed Norma Trujillo and Bhushan Gupta for the two open seats on January 16, 2018 and recommended that each be appointed for four-year terms, starting at the committee's next scheduled meeting on February 21, 2018. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY There are 15 positions on the Committee for Community Engagement. Two vacancies were created when a member stepped down in December 2017 and a second member stepped down in January 2018. Norma Trujillo and Bhushan Gupta were interviewed on January 16, 2018, by Mayor John Cook and Councilor Marc Woodard, as the interviewing committee. They recommended that Norma Trujillo and Bhushan Gupta each be appointed for four-year terms, to expire at the end of February 2022. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Council could decide to not approve the recommendation. This would require reopening the recruitment, including to the applicants who had applied for the current vacancies. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS Strategic Plan, Goal 3: Engage the community through dynamic communications. City of Tigard Vision Task Force: "The City will maximize the effectiveness of the volunteer spirit to accomplish the greatest good for our community." DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION N/A Attachments Resolution CCE Appointments CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 18 - A RESOLUTION APPOINTING NORMA TRUJILLO AND BHUSHAN GUPTA TO THE COMMITTEE FOR COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT, EACH FOR A TERM OF FOUR YEARS, EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 7, 2018 THROUGH FEBRUARY 29,2022. WHEREAS, the bylaws of the Committee for Community Engagement as of May 2017 call for appointing up to 15 members on the Committee for Community Engagement;and WHEREAS, the committee already has 13 standing members, with two vacancies to be filled by eligible applicants who reside, own property, own a business or work within the City of Tigard's Urban Services Boundary;and WHEREAS,Norma Trujillo and Bhushan Gupta were interviewed by Mayor John Cook and committee liaison Councilor Marc Woodard on January 16, 2018, for two open positions on the Committee for Community Engagement NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: Norma Trujillo is appointed to the Committee for Community Engagement as a Member for a four-year term, effective February 7,2018 through February 29,2022. SECTION 2: Bhushan Gupta is appointed to the Committee for Community Engagement as a Member for a four-year term, effective February 7,2018 through February 29,2022. SECTION 3: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This day of 2018. Mayor-City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder-City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 18- Page 1 AIS-3348 5. Business Meeting One Meeting Date: 02/06/2018 Length (in minutes): 5 Minutes Agenda Title: Contract Award - SW Wall Street Improvement Project Prepared For: Joseph Barrett Submitted By: Kelly Burgoyne, Central Services Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Local Update, Discussion, Direct Contract Staff Review Board Public Hearing No Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE Shall the Local Contract Review Board award a contract for the SW Wall Street Improvement project to Columbia Pacific Construction? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends the Local Contract Review Board award a contract for the SW Wall Street Improvement project to Columbia Pacific Construction in the amount of$2,300,553 and authorize the City Manager to take the steps necessary to execute the contract. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY Project Background: Public Infrastructure Finance The city's SW Wall Street Improvement project is part of the larger Hunziker Infrastructure Project which includes an initial two phases of construction totaling about $8 million in new public access, transportation, sewer and water service. This investment will catalyze commercial and industrial development and increase employment in the Hunziker Industrial Core. Over the last four years, the city has been working to fund this project through state, federal and regional grants. Work began in 2014 with a Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) funded Public Infrastructure Finance Strategy. This resulted in the recruitment of the industrial development firm Trammell Crow and their interest in a 15 acre site off of Wall Street. Securing $1.5 million in matching funds from the State of Oregon's Capital Construction funds was the next critical step in this process allowing the city to move forward with preliminary design work. Following this, the city secured a commitment of more than $2M from the U.S. Department of Commerce Economic Development Agency and a $1.6M commitment from developer Trammell Crow to fund this phase of the project. This project uses public infrastructure to transform an underperforming industrial district to increase private sector investment, development, and employment. New public infrastructure for this project includes 2,000 linear feet of public road designed for industrial use with curb and gutter, sidewalks, bike lanes and stormwater planter areas for water quality treatment. Within the road alignment, an 8" sewer, 12" waterline, and stormwater lines will be constructed which will serve adjacent industrial sites. Project Need: Public Infrastructure to Catalyze Private Investment This project improves development potential and access within the 138 acres of the Hunziker Industrial Core - an area of mostly industrial property 3/4 mile from Hwy 217 and I-5 access. It supports infill development reducing development pressure on the regional urban growth boundary; ensuring large lot industrial sites in other cities can be put to their highest and best use. It transforms an underutilized industrial area with ready access to freight networks. New public infrastructure will act as a catalyst for private sector investment. Tigard's Hunziker Industrial Core should support 150 to 300 jobs for residents from around the region with average wages of$75K (2012 IMPLAN). Direct and indirect economic output from initial private sector investment on the first 40 acres of property unlocked through this project is estimated at $123M with another $37.2M in earnings accruing to employees from around the region (2012 IMPLAN). The area exemplifies the challenge land-constrained inner-ring suburban cities face when trying to support business growth. Surrounded on almost every side by development, Tigard can no longer meet regional benchmarks for employment by expanding boundaries. The regional workforce is expected to grow by 300,000 in the next 10 years. In order to fulfill its responsibility as a regional employer, supporting at least another 10,000 employees over the next 15 years, Tigard must more efficiently use existing industrial lands, smaller parcels and sites previously considered too expensive to develop. The 138 acre Hunziker Industrial Core originally developed as warehousing and distribution facilities to serve regional demand. New public infrastructure will act as a catalyst for this area's maturation into a mixed use employment center with a wider range of businesses supporting higher levels of employment. Procurement Process An Invitation to Bid was issued for the project in late November of 2017. The city ran the public notice for the project in four (4) different publications a total of ten (10) times over a 30 day period. This was done in an outreach effort to minority-owned, women-owned, and emerging small businesses in accordance with requirements of federal funds from the Economic Development Agency (EDA). Upon closing on January 2, 2018, the city received bids from nine (9) contractors: •Engineer's Estimate - $2,972,979 • Columbia Pacific Construction - $2,300,553 • Goodfellow Bros, Inc. - $2,604,645 •Elting Northwest, Inc. - $2,735,238 •Kerr Contractors Oregon - $2,743,855 •Pacific Excavation - $2,775,493 •M.L. Houck Construction - $2,788,422 • Clark and Sons Excavating - $2,805,892 •Emery & Sons Construction - $2,960,412 •Braun Construction - $3,137,773 Staff conducted a thorough review of the bids and has found that Columbia Pacific Construction has submitted the lowest responsible bid for the work. Staff has determined that there is nothing on file with Oregon's Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI), Oregon's Construction Contractor's Board (CCB), or the Federal System for Award Management (SAM). As such, staff is recommending the contract for the SW Wall Street Improvement project be awarded to Columbia Pacific Construction in an amount not to exceed $2,300,553. OTHER ALTERNATIVES The Local Contract Review Board may reject all bids and direct staff to resolicit the work. This would have possible negative consequences on the federal grant-imposed timelines for the project. COUNCIL OR TCDA GOALS, POLICIES, MASTER PLANS N/A DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION January 23, 2017 ROW Acquisition Memo January 10, 2017 Project Discussion (LID) September 27, 2016 Resolution of Necessity for Hunziker Infrastructure ROW May 11, 2016 ROW Executive Session Discussion The Local Contract Review Board authorized the award of the preliminary design contract to MSA at their January 12, 2016 meeting. The Local Contract Review Board discussed the preliminary design contract at their December 15, 2015 workshop. The City Council approved $200,000 in funding for Phase 1 of this contract at their October 13, 2015 meeting. Council received schematic details and budget estimates in a preliminary engineering report on the project on November 17, 2015. This contract is a piece of the Hunziker Industrial/Commercial Core project that began in early 2014 with a DLCD funded study of public infrastructure financing scenarios that could improve the economic performance of the Core. The Council has been briefed on parts of this project at the following meetings: February 18, 2014; September 9, 2014; December 9, 2014; and June 16, 2015 Fiscal Impact Cost: $2,300,553 Budgeted (yes or no): Yes Where Budgeted (department/program):Transportation CIP Fund Additional Fiscal Notes: This project is funded largely by three outside sources: •A grant from the Economic Development Administration (?EDA) federal grant ($2.083 million) •A developer reimbursement ($1.65 million), and •An earmark from the State of Oregon ($980,000 out of a total of$1.5 million - the remainder will be held for future phases of Wall Street). The FY 17-18 budget has a total of$2,814,000 available for construction costs which is enough to cover the costs of the proposed contract. Attachments No file(s) attached. Y„ .:............:.. .......... .... .,,,,..,. ..,.,,,..., .,.. ,............... ,._�...:_._...,�:.... _ '"` ,,._ .............. �.�.-`.. .,,.,,,,,,,..,E AIS-3416 6. Business Meeting One Meeting Date: 02/06/2018 Length (in minutes): 5 Minutes Agenda Title: Purchase Award -John Deere Utility Tractor/Mower Prepared For: Joseph Barrett Submitted By: Joseph Barrett, Finance and Information Services Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Local Contract Review Board Public Hearing No Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE Shall the Local Contract Review Board approve a purchase for a John Deere 5085E Utility Tractor/Mower for the Public Works Streets division? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends the Local Contract Review Board approve the purchase of a John Deere 5085E Utility Tractor/Mower for a total of$99,207 by way of a permissive cooperative purchase under State of Oregon contract #1443. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY A boom or flail mower, historically referred to as the "Tiger Mower", is used to mow long areas of rights-of-way (ROW) along city streets and pathways. The equipment is used to quickly mow areas that range from 5 to 15 feet wide and up to several hundred feet long. It is used to mow everything from grass and briars to bushes, branches, and saplings up to 3" caliper. Due to these capabilities, the equipment allows staff to safely mow and clear areas much faster and with less personnel than it would be to do it with other equipment or by hand. With the addition of the new "Green Team" in the Public Works department, it is expected that an even greater demand for this piece of equipment will develop. The Public Works Department has done a monumental job of nursing the current mower, around since the late 1980's, along for many years but last summer the main boom that supports the flail portion of the mower broke in half and is unrepairable. The boom had been reinforced several times before, fatigue from more than 30 years of use finally caught up with the equipment. The total cost of new John Deere 5085E utility tractor/mower is $99,207 and is budgeted in the Street Maintenance division. As with the majority of the vehicles and heavy rolling equipment, the proposed tractor/mower will be purchased through an existing State of Oregon contract with John Deere that is open to a permissive cooperative purchases. The purchase will be made through one of their authorized dealers, Pape Machinery, Inc. Such a purchase is authorized under Tigard Public Contracting Rule 10.085 and ORS 279A.215. This manner of purchase assures the city receives competitive pricing via bulk volume and saves the city the cost and time of preparing a formal solicitation that would likely lead to higher pricing. OTHER ALTERNATIVES COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION The funds for this tractor/mower purchase were approved by City Council at their January 23, 2018 meeting with passage of the Second Quarter Budget Supplemental. Fiscal Impact Cost: $99,207 Budgeted (yes or no): Yes Where budgeted?: Gas Tax Fund Additional Fiscal Notes: The funds for this tractor/mower purchase were approved by City Council at their January 23, 2018 meeting with passage of the Second Quarter Budget Supplemental. That action approved $110,000 in Contingency funds be used for the purchase of the equipment. Attachments No file(s) attached AIS-3383 7. Business Meeting One Meeting Date: 02/06/2018 Length (in minutes): 45 Minutes Agenda Title: Consideration of Local Option Levy Referral Prepared For: Marty Wine Submitted By: Kelly Burgoyne, Central Services Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Meeting Type: Council Staff Business Meeting - Main Public Hearing No Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE Council will receive alternative levy packages per the council direction from December 12th, 2017. Levy packages are for discussion and consideration of referral of a local option levy to voters. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff have provided draft levy packages, council is not restricted to these packages alone, and recommends that if a levy package were to move forward that it should: 1) Restore a significant percentage of the cuts proposed for the upcoming fiscal year 2018/2019. 2) Leverage funds to achieve a sustainable levy model that could be renewed with no tax increase for a period of ten years. 3) Consider the will of the Levy and Bond Task Force and the public when deliberating the type of programs to fund. 4) Levy at a rate of$1.00-1.18 per $1,000 assessed value; raising approximately $6 - 7 million in operating funds. Staff recommends that council decide on a levy package in order to allow staff to draft a ballot title for consideration on February 13th & 20th, 2018. Staff recommends if a levy is desired that council refer the levy on the May 2018 ballot. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY 1) Council created the Levy and Bond Task Force (LBTF) with a unanimous vote in 2017. The LBTF convened in the summer of 2017 and presented a unanimous recommendation to the council on December 12, 2017 to pursue a local option levy above $1.00/1.000. 2) Council directed staff to develop potential levy packages and each councilor has been brief individually on the aspects of the levy packages for consideration during open session. 3) City Management is currently preparing the budget for FYI8/19. That budget includes cuts that will be considered by the budget committee this spring. The budget process and calendar has been adapted to allow Council, City Management, and the Budget Committee to respond in a timely manner if a levy is passed in May 2018 and restoring programs becomes a possibility. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Council is not restricted to the provided levy packages or amounts. Council can also decide not to pursue a levy or to delay to future elections. COUNCIL OR TCDA GOALS, POLICIES, MASTER PLANS Levy packages can be crafted to pursue priorities of the council and public while increasing the financial health of the city. DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION December 12, 2017 Council received recommendations on levy size, scope and timing from the Levy and Bond Task Force. Fiscal Impact Cost: 0 Budgeted (yes or no): no Where Budgeted (department/program): General Fund Additional Fiscal Notes: If a levy is referred to voters and passed, the city will recognize increased general fund revenues relative to the size of the levy. Staff is recommending that if a levy is referred that it be between $1.00-1.18 per $1,000 of assessed value. A levy in this range would increase the general fund between $6 -7 million. Attachments Levy Packages Ir City of Tigard Memorandum To: City Council From: City Management Re: Potential Levy Packages Date: January 25th, 2018 Package A Package B Package C Package D • 87% restoration of • 87% restoration • 87% restoration of • 87% restoration of cuts "Steady Growth" cuts cuts • $1m Sidewalk and • Maintain • $850k Sidewalk and • $750k Sidewalk and SRTS o Police Patrols SRTS SRTS • $100k enhanced o School Resource • $100k enhanced • $100k enhanced Recreation Program Officers Recreation Program Parks Maintenance • $200k enhanced o Narcotics and • $300k enhanced • $250k Housing Parks Maintenance Investigations Parks Maintenance Development Program • $300k Housing • Maintain • $50k Seniors and • $50k Seniors and Development Program o Library Hours Children Library Children Library • $50k Seniors and o Library Reading Program Program Children Library Programs • $300k enhanced • $300k enhanced Program • Maintain Police Patrol Police Patrol • $300k enhanced o Recreation Police Patrol o Park Maintenance Restore: $2.29m Restore: $2.29m Restore: $2.29m Restore: $2.29m Enhance: $1.95m Enhance: 0 Enhance: $1.6m Enhance: $1.45m 7m: 9 years 7m: 12 years 7m: 9 years 7m: 10 years 6m: 7 years 6m: 11 years 6m: 7 years 6m: 8 years BALLOT TITLE: REQUIREMENTS SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET Caption (10 words) FOR Operating levy to maintain city services. (DATE OF MEETING) • Purpose is to identify the type of tax • Do not include city name or dollar amount Question (20 words) Shall Tigard adopt 5y'ear operating levy of$1 per S1,000 for maintaining police,parks, and library services, beginning 2019? This measure may cause property taxes to increase more than three percent. • Must include the name of the taxing district • Must include the purpose of the tax, such as operating or capital project • Must include the number of years that the tax will be imposed and the first fiscal year the tax will be imposed • Must include the second sentence directly after the question for new local option taxes,but does not count towards the 20-word limit Summary (175 words) This measure will hep pay for police,parks, and library services. The City Council placed this measure on the ballot to maintain services and programs for . Examples of services include: Police: - Maintain current staffing levels involved in community policing and crime prevention - Reduce emergency response times Parks: - Provide maintenance for playgrounds, sports fields, and trails Library: - Maintain current children and adult program schedules Without this additional revenue, the City Estimated revenues for each year of levy: $_in 2019-20 $ in 2020-21 ,$_in 2021-22 .$in 2022-23 $ in 2023-24 • Explain the purpose in plain language; do not advocate a yes or no answer • Must include the total amount of tax to be raised by the measure;if in the form of a rate,the summary must also give an estimate of the amount of tax to be raised in each year in which the tax will be imposed. This statement is not included in the 175-word limit. EXAMPLE: BALLOT TITLE LANGUAGE CAPTION Operating Levy for Police,Parks, Sidewalks and City Services QUESTION (If maintain:) Shall Tigard adopt five-year operating levy of$1.00 per $1,000 for maintaining police,parks, and library services,beginning 2019? (If enhance:) Shall Tigard adopt five-year operating levy of$1.18 per$1,000,increasing funding for police, parks, sidewalks,beginning 2019? This measure may cause property taxes to increase more than three percent. SUMMARY This measure would help pay for and enhance city services,including police,parks maintenance,library services, safe walking routes and sidewalk programs, and supporting housing options. The City Council placed this measure on the ballot to maintain and improve city services and programs, such as: Police: • Maintain current staffing for community policing and neighborhood patrol • Reduce police response times • Preserve and enhance traffic enforcement • Preserve school resource officer program and peer court Parks and Recreation: • Maintain upkeep of current parks, trails, playgrounds,ball fields, natural areas, and future developed park land • Expand recreation programs and activities Library: • Maintain and expand library hours, children's reading programs • Enhance multicultural resources • Enhance library collection (Add with "enhance"package:) Walking: Deliver a focused sidewalk improvement program linked to the Safe Routes to School priorities Housing: Increase housing options with a program and funds to incentivize affordable housing development Without this additional revenue, all general fund services including police,park maintenance,library, recreation would be decreased. Estimated revenues for each year of levy: --Council Woodard Local Option Levy, Opposition Statement- Council Business Meeting,6 Feb is "Now more than ever, governments and not-for-profit organizations are expected to demonstrate performance levels typically demanded of the private sector while demonstrating accountability and transparency. As a result,boards, councils, and management teams have to rethink how they operate and put a greater emphasis on continuous improvement, performance metrics, and community outcomes [Moss Adams: Performance Audit Services Overview,Jan 2018]." On 13 September 2016, I "found it problematic to support outreach or going out for a local option levy without having done a city performance audit to measure efficiency first." "I want a new look at city operations before going out for a levy[minutes]." On 18 October 2016, I'm"still of the mindset that the city needs to have a performance audit done before going out for public outreach [Local Contract Review Board and Business meeting]." I didn't vote for the public outreach and messaging to support DHM research services. I thought the consulting service resources of 12ok would best be served performing a public works audit, specifically scoped on improving measuring operational efficiency and oversight- prior to asking tax payers for more money. On 13 June 2017- Council approved the levy and bond Task Force By-Laws [five levy meetings were held from May through Oct 2017]. Thereafter the Task Force had begun deliberating over feasibility of a Civics facilities bond to see what support there was for civic facilities needs in the future. This began on Oct 2017,running through April 2018. On 12 December 2017— I was still not in favor of a local option levy until a city performance audit was complete. I asked the Task Force if they were aware a councilor "voted NO on 18 October 2016 for a local option levy..." I meant specifically the public outreach and messaging contract award to DHM research firm to determine community support for a levy. One-or-two of fifteen Task Force members raised half an arm. I stated, "We may have a Revenue's problem...but`I believe'we also have a spend problem." So what is the revenues gap we're asking tax payer's to make our city services and facilities short falls whole... absent updated city operations over sight efficiency tools —I wondered what are we basing the revenues gap-ask of tax payers on?It is well known in the business community— operational inefficiencies have a cost to companies and customers. In this case a cost to tax payers. I like other business owners need the other half of the equation"or inefficiency-costs equation"to determine a net revenue short fall, or revenues gap; then find cost savings through corrective actions [TVCTV, council business meeting]. I continue to believe a City Performance Audit is long overdue in two departments: Public Works and Community Development." I would also argue the following Audits are overdue: Library— 31 December 2006 (12 years ago); Policing Services — 2007(ii years ago); Engineering 2009 (9 years ago). When I first came to council in Jan 2011, Mayor Dirksen asked of staff"which departments had not had an audit recently and suggested the Public Works Department may be due." City Manager Prosser agreed as SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET FOR a 031/1 (DATE OF MEETING) Council Woodard Local Option Levy, Opposition Statement- Council Business Meeting,6 Feb 18 well as I did, "it would be the most appropriate department to look at next [Council Business Meeting, 18 January 2011]." There were never any city performance audits performed after this discussion. • "I'm not in favor"of a local option levy at this time or until oversight inefficiencies can be identified and corrected within the public works depart. Once corrective action occurs —will result in "cost savings to the tax payer and narrow or remove"some of the City Revenue gap ask of the tax payer. Another belief I stand by -A 1/2 of 1 percent revenues gap is a real thing based on the Annual City financial audits by Moss Adams. However, I believe the current gap would be significantly less or non-existent had the City heeded the advice of the 2011-2012 council suggestion by Mayor Dirksen to continue a City performance audit of public works — City manager Prosser,former councilor Henderson and I agreed in support of this action. • "I am in favor"of pushing the local option levy out to a vote in May 2019, or later after an appropriately scoped city performance audit has been complete within the public works department. This would serve as councils continuing commitment to tax payers -we wouldn't ask for anything more than we need. Until a continuing commitment to City Performance Audits is made through annual council goal setting, I believe tax payers will continue to pay more now and later regardless of whether a local option levy is approved by the voters. The cost-of-inefficient city services is not sustainable for those on fixed incomes. After serving on council, now the longest serving council member entering into my 8th year... I have not waivered on this call-to-action since 2011; and recognize the current 1.7% annual city growth rate is real. However I'd argue like many others: Annual growth and development should sufficiently resource city government growth size, head count, civic facilities and services priority needs. If we're going to ask tax payers to support a"Tigard first ever" City Operations Levy- we should be able to show them we've done everything possible to run a transparent, efficient, accountable and sustainable City Operation... that is principled in Best-In- Class "Business Excellence Practices."This builds public trust in City government. It has been difficult for me to oppose this ballot measure because I'd like to see more resources available for city recreation,parks maintenance, and library and law enforcement services. But I cannot in good conscious turn a blind eye to my conservative business principles. If Tigard continues the same status quo operations without oversight the culture won't change to competitive efficiency. And I believe within 5 years,will cause unsustainable and unaffordable city services and a continue need for city services to be bailed out by tax payers. AIS-3384 8. Business Meeting One Meeting Date: 02/06/2018 Length (in minutes): 10 Minutes Agenda Title: TCDA Board Consideration of a Minor Amendment to the City Center Urban Renewal Plan Submitted By: Sean Fancily, Community Development Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: City Center Resolution Development Agency Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE The Board of the TCDA is requested to consider a resolution for a Minor Amendment to the City Center Urban Renewal Plan, removing 1.6 acres of street right-of-way from the City Center Urban Renewal Area. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends approval of the minor amendment. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY A substantial amendment to the City Center Urban Renewal Plan was approved by voters in May 2017. The substantial amendment increased the size of the district to increase the district's financial capacity and bring the district closer to generating tax increment for its authorized $22 million in maximum indebtedness. In processing the necessary paperwork to update the urban renewal district's boundary with the Washington County Assessor's office, staff identified that the legal description of the expanded district inadvertently included 1.6 acres of right-of-way (Garden Place). This ROW was not shown on the map in the Report Accompanying the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Substantial Amendment, and was not intended to be included within the district. Since the area in question is street right-of-way, this action will have no impact on the financial capacity of the district. Removal of acreage from the district is considered a minor amendment under the City Center Urban Renewal Plan. Minor amendments can be approved by the Agency Board by resolution. The resolution will remove the 1.6 acres from the urban renewal area and adopt the corrected legal description. The Town Center Advisory Commission was briefed on the amendment at their January 10 meeting. OTHER ALTERNATIVES The Board could request staff for additional options for the minor amendment. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS City Center Urban Renewal Plan. DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION This is the first consideration of the topic. Attachments Resolution Exhibit A-Legal Description Exhibit B-Map CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY RESOLUTION NO. 18- A RESOLUTION REMOVING 1.6 ACRES OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM THE CITY CENTER URBAN RENEWAL AREA WHEREAS, a substantial amendment to the City Center Urban Renewal Plan to expand the size of the district was approved by voters in May, 2017; and WHEREAS,in the writing of the legal description of the expanded district, 1.6 acres of right-of-way was inadvertently included in the district,but was not shown on the map in the Report Accompanying the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Substantial Amendment,and was not intended to be included in the district;and WHEREAS, the City Center Urban Renewal Plan has provision to remove area from the district by a minor amendment to the Plan. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,by the Tigard Town Center Development Agency that: SECTION 1: The City Center Urban Renewal Plan is hereby amended to remove 1.6 acres of right-of-way. SECTION 2: The new legal description and map of the City Center Urban Renewal Area are shown in Exhibits A and B,respectively,and incorporated by reference. SECTION 3: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This day of , 2018. Chair—City of Tigard Town Center Development Agency ATTEST: Recorder—City of Tigard Town Center Development Agency TCDA Resolution No. 18- Page 1 EXHIBIT A CITY CENTER URBAN RENEWAL AREA LEGAL DESCRIPTION A tract of land in Section 35 Township 1 South, Range 1 West and Sections 1 and 2 Township 2 South, Range 1 West Willamette Meridian City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. Described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the southerly right-of-way of SW Greenburg Road with the southeast line of the John L. Hinklin DLC;thence N 07° 41' 55" W a distance of 100.77 feet to the north right-of-way of SW Greenburg Road; thence N 10° 32' 02"E a distance of 419.98 feet; thence S 88° 04' 51"E a distance of 168.91 feet; thence N 46° 34' 35"E a distance of 73.95 feet; thence S 85° 47' 11 E a distance of 190.07 feet; S 02° 45' 30" W a distance of 72.32 feet; thence N 75° 18' 06"E a distance of 36.45 feet; thence N 46° 48' 53" E a distance of 173.62 feet; thence N 64° 02" 12"E a distance of 177.40 feet to the westerly right-of-way of SW Hall Blvd.; thence N 36° 35' 04"E a distance of 83.84 feet to the easterly right-of-way of SW Hall Blvd.; thence N 64° 31' 19"E a distance of 148.06 feet; thence S 26° 03' 02"E a distance of 160.00 feet; thence N 64° 17' 30" E 148.04 feet to the southwesterly right-of-way of Highway 217; thence S 35° 21' 18"E, along said southwesterly right-of-way, a distance of 171.44 feet; thence S 42° 33' 04"E, along said southwesterly right-of-way, a distance of 99.48 feet; thence S 26° 55' 45"E, a distance of 225.54 feet to the northerly right of way of Highway 99 W; thence S 33° 05' 43"E, along said southwesterly right-of-way, a distance of 127.63 feet to the southerly right- of-way of Highway 99 W; thence S 18° 46' 14"E, along said southwesterly right-of-way, a distance of 123.73, more or less to the north line of Lot 1, Crow Park 217 and being point hereinafter referred to as "Point A"; thence S 18° 46' 14"E, along said southwesterly right-of- way, a distance of 33.80 feet; thence N 79° 41' 28" E, along said southwesterly right-of-way, a distance of 57.29 feet to an angle point on an offset spiral curve; thence S 33° 44' 44"E, along said southwesterly right-of-way, a distance of 221.73 feet (spiral curve chord); thence S 52° 02' 57" E, along said southwesterly right-of-way, a distance of 315.25 feet; thence S 41° 09' 43"E, along said southwesterly right-of-way, a distance of 302.54 feet; thence S 33° 34' 36"E, along said southwesterly right-of-way, a distance of 703.90 feet to the north line of the Wm. Graham D.L.C. and the southeast corner of Lot 2 Crow Park 217; thence N 81° 39' 34" W, along the south line of Crow Park 217, a distance of 963.07 feet to the northwest corner of said Wm. Graham D.L.C. and an angle point in said Lot 2; thence N 79° 02' 14"W, along said south line of Crow Park 217, a distance of 506.40 feet to the northeast corner of Lot 1 Knoll Acres; thence S 00° 42' 32"W, along the easterly line of Lots 1, 2, 3, &4 Knoll Acres, a distance of 407.90 feet to the northeast corner of Lot 5 Knoll Acres; thence S 30° 16' 07" W, along the easterly line of said Lot 5, a distance of 149.08 feet to the northerly right-of-way of SW Hunziker Street; thence S 48° 40' 12" W a distance of 85.64 feet to the intersection of the southerly right-of-way of SW Hunziker Street with the easterly right-of-way of SW Hall Blvd.; thence N89° 25' 34" E, along the southerly right-of-way of SW Hunziker Street, 27.85 feet to an angle point; thence S 59° 29' 34" E a distance of 261.39 feet to the west line of Deed Doc.No. 89-14950, Washington County Deed Records (as depicted on SN 25,383); thence S 30° 30' 24" W, along last said west line a distance of 216.56 feet; thence N 59° 28' 54" W a distance of 120.00 feet; thence N 30° 27' 59"E a distance of 100.00 feet; thence N 59° 29' 34" W a distance of 133.60 feet; thence N 89° 17' 28" W a distance of 24.63 feet to the center line of SW Hall Blvd; thence along the center line of SW Hall Blvd. the following nine (9) courses; thence S 00°42' 32" W a distance of 35.34 feet to a point of curve of a curve to the right; thence along said curve to the right with a radius of 163.70 feet, a central angle of 44° 01' 33" (a chord which bears S 22° 43' 19"W, 122.71 feet) and a length of 125.79 feet to a point of tangency; thence S 44° 44' 05" W a distance of 455.02 feet to a point of curve of a curve to the left; thence along said curve to the left with a radius of 179.05 feet, a central angle of 42° 08' 24" (a chord which bears S 23° 39' 53" W, 128.74 feet) and a length of 131.69 feet to a point of tangency; thence S 02° 35' 41" W a distance of 510.56 feet to a point of curve of a curve to the left; thence along said curve to the left with a radius of 190.99 feet, a central angle of 40° 59' 58" (a chord which bears S 17° 54' 18" E, 133.77 feet) and a length of 136.67 feet to a point of tangency; thence S 38° 24' 17" E a distance of 62.89 feet to a point of curve of a curve to the right; thence along said curve to the right with a radius of 190.99 feet, a central angle of 40° 07' 28" (a chord which bears S 18° 20' 33" W, 131.03 feet) and a length of 133.75 feet to a point of tangency; thence S 01° 43' 11" W a distance of 704.79 feet; thence N 88° 16' 45" W a distance of 35.01 feet to the northeast corner of Parcel 1 Partition Plat 1992-069 on the westerly right-of-way of SW Hall Blvd; thence along the northerly and westerly lines of said Partition Plat the following 7 courses; thence N 19° 59' 47" W a distance of 36.96 feet; thence N 77° 33' 03" W a distance of 39.55 feet; thence N 68° 35' 31" W a distance of 63.16 feet; thence S 89° 17' 05" W a distance of 56.25 feet; thence N 81° 13' 33"W a distance of 92.73 feet; thence S 36° 40' 28" W a distance of 116.84 feet; thence S 57° 58' 03" W a distance of 43.20 feet; thence N 77°47' 58" W a distance of 110.95 feet; thence S 02° 30' 20" W a distance of 422.27 feet to the northerly right-of-way of SW Omara Street; thence N 87° 45' 14" W, along the northerly right-of-way, a distance of 19.65 feet; thence S 03° 57' 44" W, along the westerly right-of-way of SW Omara Street a distance of 24.61 feet and a point on a non-tangent curve to the right; thence along said curve to the right with a radius of 145.90, a central angle of 67° 12' 06" (a chord which bears N 28° 27' 10" W, 161.48 feet) and a length of 171.12 feet to a point of tangency; thence N 05° 09'15"E a distance of 10.48 feet; thence N 87° 56' 13" W a distance of 189.71 feet to the west line of Chelsea Hill; thence N 05° 09' 16"E, along the easterly line of Chelsea Hill a distance of 219.78 feet to the northeast corner of Lot 10 Chelsea Hill; thence N 64° 24' 41" W, along the northerly line of said Lot 10, a distance of 74.22 feet to the northwest corner of said Lot 10; thence S 49° 33' 17" W, along the westerly line of said Lot 10, a distance of 89.36 feet to the south west corner of said Lot 10 and a point on a non-tangent curve to the left; thence along said curve to the left with a radius of 140.02, a central angle of 73° 14' 45" (a chord which bears N 77° 04' 28" W, 167.06 feet) and a length of 179.00 feet to the southeast corner of Lot 27 Chelsea Hill; thence N 60° 54' 15"W, along the easterly line of said Lot 27, a distance of 149.70 feet to the northeast corner; thence S 76° 32' 45" W, along the northerly line of Lots 27 and 28 Chelsea Hill, a distance of 90.00 feet to the northwest corner of said Lot 27 being on the northerly line of Chelsea Hill No. 2; thence N 41° 41' 53"W, a distance of 365.61 feet to the southeasterly line of Duck Creek Homes; thence along the southeasterly and the northeasterly line of Duck Creek Homes the following 5 courses; thence N 44° 27' 43" E a distance of 50.76 feet; thence N 25° 06' 01" W a distance of 73.15 feet; thence N 05° 03' 58"E a distance of 40.00 feet; thence N 66° 13' 57"E a distance of 18.50 feet; thence N 42° 08' 14" W a distance of 112.77 feet to the northwest corner of Duck Creek Homes; thence N 44° 27' 43"E a distance of 20.57 feet; thence N 45° 36' 55" W a distance of 359.09 feet to the northwesterly right-of-way of SW Ash Avenue;thence S 44° 27' 43" W, along said northwesterly right-of-way of SW Ash Avenue, a distance of 258.18 feet to the southwest line of Lot 9 Burnham Tract; thence N 42° 08' 14" W a distance of 380.48 feet to the most westerly corner of said Lot 9; thence N 50° 24' 52"E, along the northwest line of said Lot 9, a distance of 143.90 feet; thence N 42° 59' 15" W a distance of 821.63 feet, more or less, to the southeasterly right-of-way of SW Main Street,being a point on a non-tangent curve to the right; thence along said curve to the right with a radius of 1,870.00 feet, a central angle of 6° 35' 46" (a chord which bears N 55° 58' 35"E, 215.15 feet) and a length of 215.28 feet; thence N 59° 16' 28"E, along said southeasterly right-of-way, a distance of 202.32 feet to a point of non-tangent curve to the left; thence along said right-of-way and said curve to the left with a radius of 180.29 feet, a central angle of 19° 44' 52" (a chord which bears N 78° 43' 27" E, 61.83 feet) and a length of 62.14 feet; thence N 52° 43' 34" W a distance of 231.87 feet to the intersection point of the northwesterly right-of-way of HWY 99 W with the northerly right-of-way of SW Johnson Street; thence N 55° 27' 12" W, along said northerly right-of-way of SW Johnson Street, a distance of 219.79 feet to the northwest line of Lot 53, Amended Plat of North Tigardville Addition; thence N 42° 05' 45"E, along said northwest line of Lot 53, a distance of 645.17 feet to the westerly line of a Greenway Dedication as per Document No. 92014958, Washington County Deed Records; thence along said westerly line of Greenway Dedication the following four courses; thence S 32° 56' 44"E a distance of 40.58 feet; thence S 03° 52' 52"E a distance of 85.60 feet; thence S 0° 32' 56"E a distance of 59.64 feet; and thence S 07° 33' 33"E a distance of 151.19 feet to the northwesterly right-of-way of HWY 99 W; thence along said northwesterly right-of- way of HWY 99 W the following 5 courses; thence N 44° 08' 14" E a distance of 48.33 feet; thence N 07° 33' 33" W a distance of 27.78 feet; thence N 46° 23' 16"E a distance of 366.71 feet; thence N 49° 49' 08" E a distance of 29.37 feet; thence N 51° 23' 28" E a distance of 295.46 feet to the southerly right-of-way of SW Tigard Street; thence N 62° 37' 00" W, along the southerly right of way of SW Tigard Street, a distance of 20.82 feet; thence N 46° 55' 01"E, along the southerly right of way of SW Tigard Street, a distance of 11.00 feet to a point 20.00 feet south of the center line of SW Tigard Street; thence N 49° 55' 59" W, parallel with and 20.00 feet from the center line of SW Tigard Street(when measured at right angles), a distance of 99.33 feet; thence N 62° 33' 24" W, parallel with and 20.00 feet from the center line of SW Tigard Street (when measured at right angles), a distance of 820.72 feet to a point at the extension of the westerly right-of-way; thence N 36°24' 01"E a distance of 240.58 feet to the point of intersection of the northerly right-of-way of SW Commercial Street, 30.00 feet from the center line of SW Commercial Street (when measured at right angles), with the extension of the westerly right-of-way of SW 95th Ave; thence S 62° 32' 35"E,parallel with and 30.00 feet from the centerline of SW Commercial Street (when measured at right angles), a distance of 594.81 feet to the east right-of-way of SW Lincoln Avenue to a point on a curve to the left; thence along said curve to the left with a radius of 9.49 feet, a central angle of 100° 21' 02" (a chord which bears S 14° 53' 25"E, 14.57 feet) and a length of 16.61 feet to the northerly right-of-way of SW Commercial Street; thence S 61° 24' 10"E, along said northerly right-of-way, a distance of 187.19 feet; thence S 55° 11' 17"E, along said northerly right-of-way, a distance of 54.14 feet; thence S 51° 43' 30"E, along said northerly right-of-way, a distance of 153.60 feet to the southeast line of the John L. Hinklin DLC; thence N 46° 44' 38"E, along said Hinklin DLC line, a distance of 1204.91 feet to point of beginning. EXCEPTING THEREFROM, that tract of land being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the hereinabove described "Point A"; thence along said north line of Lot 1 Crow Park 217, S 64° 22' 46" W, a distance of 201.24 feet, more or less to the east right-of-way line of SW Garden Place and the True Point of Beginning of this exception area; thence along the easterly and southerly lines of said right-of-way, the following 17 courses, S 18° 46' 14" E, a distance of 339.42 feet to a point on a curve to the left; thence along said curve to the left with a radius of 641.49 feet, a central angle of 8° 34' 50" (a chord which bears S 23° 03' 39"E, 95.98 feet) and a length of 96.07 feet; thence S 27° 21' 04"E, 136.62 feet to a point on a curve to the left; thence along said curve to the left with a radius of 80.41 feet, a central angle of 33° 37' 42" (a chord which bears S 44° 09' 50" E, 46.52 feet) and a length of 47.19 feet to a point of compound curve to the left; thence along said curve to the left with a radius of 701.98 feet, a central angle of 10° 19' 57" (a chord which bears S 66° 08' 35"E, 126.42 feet) and a length of 126.59 feet to a point of compound curve to the left; thence along said curve to the left with a radius of 25.00 feet, a central angle of 50° 30' 14" (a chord which bears N 83° 26' 01"E, 21.33 feet) and a length of 22.04 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right; thence along said curve to the right with a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 276° 18' 03" (a chord which bears S 16° 19' 49"E, 66.72 feet) and a length of 241.12 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left; thence along said curve to the left with a radius of 25.00 feet, a central angle of 46° 05' 41" (a chord which bears N 48° 34' 00"W, 19.57 feet) and a length of 20.11 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right; thence along said curve to the right with a radius of 751.98 feet, a central angle of 10° 05' 07" (a chord which bears N 66° 34' 16"W, 132.19 feet) and a length of 132.36 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left; thence along said curve to the left with a radius of 100.00 feet, a central angle of 29° 44' 13" (a chord which bears N 76° 41' 46"W, 51.32 feet) and a length of 51.90 feet; thence S 88° 44' 12" W, 137.33 feet to a point on a curve to the left; thence along said curve to the left with a radius of 975.00 feet, a central angle of 4° 10' 53" (a chord which bears S 86° 38' 45"W, 71.14 feet) and a length of 71.16 feet; thence S 84° 33' 19"W, 202.40 feet to a point on a curve to the left; thence along said curve to the left with a radius of 70.00 feet, a central angle of 82° 23' 34" (a chord which bears S 43° 21' 24"W, 92.21 feet) and a length of 100.66 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right; thence along said curve to the right with a radius of 100.00 feet, a central angle of 72° 01' 50" (a chord which bears S 38° 10' 29" W, 117.60 feet) and a length of 125.72 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left; thence along said curve to the left with a radius of 32.00 feet, a central angle of 74° 27' 28" (a chord which bears S 36° 57' 30"W, 38.72 feet) and a length of 41.59 feet to a point of cusp; thence S 89° 43' 33"W, 2.00 feet to the east right-of-way line of S.W. Hall Boulevard; thence along said east right-of-way line on a curve to the left with a radius of 5,759.58 feet, a central angle of 1° 03' 14" (a chord which bears N 0° 48' 36"W, 105.95 feet) and a length of 105.95 feet to a point of cusp and the north right-of-way line of SW Garden Place; thence along said north right-of-way line on a curve to the left with a radius of 25.00 feet, a central angle of 53° 07' 42" (a chord which bears S 64° 49' 00" E, 22.36 feet) and a length of 23.18 feet to a point of compound curve to the left; thence along said curve to the left with a radius of 30.00 feet, a central angle of 86° 28' 16" (a chord which bears N 45° 23' 48"E, 41.10 feet) and a length of 45.28 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right; thence along said curve to the right with a radius of 120.00 feet, a central angle of 82° 23' 33" (a chord which bears N 43° 21' 27"E, 158.07 feet) and a length of 172.56 feet; thence along N 84° 33' 19" E, 373.15 feet,more or less to the southeast corner of Lot 6 Tigard Road Gardens; thence N 13° 37' 02" E, 556.65 feet,more or less to the True Point of Beginning. Total area equals 229.35 acres,more or less. EXHIBIT B IV. MAP AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF CITY CENTER URBAN RENEWAL AREA FIGURE 1. SHOWS THE URBAN RENEWAL AREA BOUNDARIES. EXHIBIT A. IS A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA. - _ . r ''' ' .0‘,. ..,•• ,0„, _, „. _. ... _ . - —.7 - •..-*\ ,,„.1....d110:::,,,,: rPOI T T A'1 - POINT OF-BEGINNING--* f ys 01 a a - ir ,/sNit,, . „,... , �� . . ,://4\ -,,,,.. - 4*,.-4> 0 c;„,c7.; ' Itc. 4, , ir-14 * • Cj �{ vi II.N ► . 4, ,of t '. •� ,71i-r., / !,, '' r. ,j;f: ,,,,,,,,.... -7%,.", ,<,80. :,\,,,,,,\_. - .,� 2293 ACES +/— t G ~moi 41, r;' � � .e /" ' ♦ ♦ sem1410, , .. 7 .. a - N. ;a; \� '. ''r,„-, ,,is F .1' # '$. `�,'�\, '`t f ! r, t $t 4r` G l a , Ad up lei 1'=660, FIGURE 1. AIS-3367 9. Business Meeting One Meeting Date: 02/06/2018 Length (in minutes): 10 Minutes Agenda Title: Consider a Resolution for Local Administration of Vertical Housing Development Zone Submitted By: Sean Family, Community Development Item Type: Resolution Meeting Type: Council Business Meeting - Main Public Hearing No Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE Shall Council approve a resolution establishing the local administration of the Vertical Housing Development Zone and amending the Master Fees and Charges schedule to institute associated fees? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends approval of the resolution establishing local control of the Vertical Housing Development Zone, as required by state legislation. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The State of Oregon enabled the Vertical Housing Development Zone (VHDZ) program that local jurisdictions can choose to adopt. The 10-year partial tax abatement can incentivize developers to add housing above first floor commercial uses in targeted areas. This results in a mix of commercial and residential activities that can be mutually supportive. In 2017, the State of Oregon enacted legislation to transfer the administration of the zone from the state's Housing and Community Services Department to each locality that has adopted the zone. The law also allows a locality to designate new (or expanded) zones, and adopt local criteria (in conformance with state statute.) Establishing new, or changing the zone's boundaries would require the concurrence of overlapping taxing jurisdictions (who can choose to opt out of a zone) and a new requirement to perform an anti-displacement analysis for existing residents. The reduction of a portion of property taxes for a defined period of time can improve the financial feasibility of a mixed-use project -- particularly in markets where lower rents might not support the cost of new construction. Qualified new development projects within a Vertical Housing Development Zone are eligible to receive a 10-year property tax abatement on the value of new construction for up to 20 percent per residential floor (for the first four floors above a commercial ground floor). Total property tax abatement of the new construction is limited to no more than 80 percent of the residential development. Land and the commercial development are fully taxed with one exception; an additional partial property tax exemption on the land may be given if some or all of the residential housing is designated as affordable housing (up to 80 percent of area median income). At the end of the 10 years, the properties revert to full assessment. Tigard adopted a Vertical Housing Development Zone for Downtown and much of the Tigard Triangle in 2014. Since Tigard's adoption, two mixed use projects have been certified under the program: Attwell off Main in Downtown, and the Adrienne in the Triangle. The proposed resolution would authorize designees of the City Manager to administer the VHDZ program. Staff from the Economic Development division will be responsible to complete the following tasks for each VHDZ application: • a pre-application conference to meet with the developer team •review of the initial application and review of criteria •performing calculations on the eligible development •issuing an eligibility certification •creating a project use agreement and certificate •coordination with the developer team and the county assessor's office •compliance monitoring •annual recertification The resolution proposes amending the Master Fees and Charges Schedule to add a fee to recover the costs of staff time- a pre-application conference and pre-certification fee ($800), an application and certification fee ($1,200), and an annual monitoring/recertification fee ($300). The state's application fee was $700. Staff recommends retaining the boundaries of the existing zone and not adding new criteria to receive the abatement. The program will be assessed over the next three years to consider if changes should be made. The state law enabling the Vertical Housing Development Zone runs until January 1, 2026. OTHER ALTERNATIVES The Vertical Housing Development Zone has already been established by Council resolution in 2014. This resolution transfers the administration of the zone from the state to the city. Council could propose changes or not approve the resolution. COUNCIL OR TCDA GOALS, POLICIES, MASTER PLANS The Vertical Housing Development Zone is consistent with the City Center Urban Renewal Plan, Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan, and Goals 9,10,and 15 of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION July 8, 2014: Council approval of resolution designating a Vertical Housing Development Zone. _a. Fiscal Impact Cost: N/A Budgeted (yes or no): yes Where Budgeted (department/program):N/A Additional Fiscal Notes: The Vertical Housing Development Zone was adopted by the city in 2014, so there are no new fiscal impacts. It should be noted the adopted Vertical Housing Development Zone is contained within adopted urban renewal districts, so the partial tax abatement program will not impact the general fund. The administration of the program will be accomplished by existing staff. The proposed fees will recover the costs of staff time to administer the program. Attachments Resolution Exhibit A VHDZ Map CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 18- A RESOLUTION TO ESTABLISH LOCAL ADMINISTRATION OF TIGARD'S VERTICAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ZONE AND AMENDING THE MASTER FEES AND CHARGES SCHEDULE TO INSTITU IL ASSOCIATED APPLICATION FEES WHEREAS, Resolution 14-38 established a Vertical Housing Development Zone (VHDZ) in Tigard, a state- enabled and locally enacted program to encourage the development of new residential mixed use projects in targeted areas;and WHEREAS,the state had previously administered the program by certifying that projects were in conformance with state statute;and WHEREAS, Oregon Senate Bill 310 (2017) has transferred the administration to local jurisdictions and authorizes the City to designate VHDZs, adopt local criteria for certification and administer its own program; and WHEREAS, the administration of the program will incur staff time to review applications,certify projects, and annually monitor projects. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: The City Manager is authorized to designate staff to administer the previously adopted Vertical Housing Development Zone. SECTION 2: The Master Fees and Charges Schedule is amended as shown in Exhibit A. SECTION 3: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This day of 2018. Mayor-City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder-City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 18- Page 1 EXHIBIT A Department Revenue Source Fee or Charge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT-MISCELLANEOUS DEVELOPMENT Vertical Housing Development Zone Pre-Application Conference/Pre-certification Letter $800 Application/ Project Certification $1,200 Annual Monitoring/Recertification $300 Effective Date 2/6/18 2/6/18 2/6/18 Attachment 2 City of Tigard S.q A Vertical Housing Development Zone offers qualified projects a ,!4 VerticalHousing 20 percent per floor tax exemption on new residential development for the first four residential floors, when that Developmentdevelopment is built above nonresidential space. m:4:':224''''''''ri:' 7 Zone SG�OLLS FERRY ' � w w 1144 a > �' a z i �'";u; peri- w 5r D� tJTH s W A N UT ST P���' . ,,,, ilio r M 'y2ikFR 3 ,, Tigard co GAARDE ST MCDONALD ST rt 1 0 ggW 0 BONITA RD O > w › > ›- _ CO a O. i—w -J 0 tY o>,�� r- Q z II in �.I �� I N DURHAM RD ~ TIGARD Sean Farrelly 5 Redevelopment Manager 503.718.2420 City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 Tigard's Vertical Housing Development Zone shown in green. www.tigard-or.gov An application to certify a project may be found at http://www.oregon.gov/ohcs/pages/hfs vertical housing program.aspx