Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
CPA2015-00005
CPA2015 - 00005 R- 12 PRESERVATION PLAN AMEND & ZONE CHANG E OregLyconDepartment of Land Conservation and Development q 635 Capitol Street N E,Srzite 150 Salem,Oregon 97.301-2540 st kk atsBr wn,G ��azz-T v� Phone:503-373-0050 Fax:50.3-375-5515 w w i v.oregon.go4T/LCD NOTICE OF ADOPTED CHANGE TO A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR LAND USE REGULATION Date: February 16, 2016 Jurisdiction: City of Tigard Local file no.: CPA2015-00005/ZON201 DLCD file no.: 007-15 The Department of Land Conservation and Development(DLCD) received the attached notice of adopted amendment to a comprehensive plan or land use regulation on 02/11/2016. A copy of the adopted amendment is available for review at the DLCD office in Salem and the local government office. Notice of the proposed amendment was submitted to DLCD 39 days prior to the first evidentiary hearing. Appeal Procedures Eligibility to appeal this amendment is governed by ORS 197.612, ORS 197.620, and ORS 197.830. Under ORS 197.830(9), a notice of intent to appeal a land use decision to LUBA must be filed no later than 21 days after the date the decision sought to be reviewed became final. If you have questions about the date the decision became final,please contact the jurisdiction that adopted the amendment. A notice of intent to appeal must be served upon the local government and others who received written notice of the final decision from the local government. The notice of intent to appeal must be served and filed in the form and manner prescribed by LUBA, (OAR chapter 661, division 10). If the amendment is not appealed,it will be deemed acknowledged as set forth in ORS 197.625(1)(a). Please call LUBA at 503-373-1265, if you have questions about appeal procedures. DLCD Contact If you have questions about this notice,please contact DLCD's Plan Amendment Specialist at 503- 934-0017 or plan.amendments&state.or.us DLCD FORM 2 NOTICE OF ADOPTED CHANGE FOR DLCO USE TO A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR File No.: 007-15 f241151 LAND USE REGULATION Received: 2/11/2016 Local governments are required to send notice of an adopted change to a comprehensive plan or land use regulation no more than 20 days after the adoption. (See OAR 660-018-0040)., The rules require that the notice include a completed copy of this form. This notice form is not for submittal of a completed periodic review task or a plan amendment reviewed in the manner of periodic review. Use Forrn 4 for an adopted urban growth boundary including over 50 acres by a city with a population greater than 2,500 within the UGB or an urban growth boundary amendment over 100 acres adopted by a metropolitan service district. Use Fo_rin �for an adopted urban reserve designation, or amendment to add over 50 acres,by a city with a population greater than 2,500 within the UGB. Use Form 6 with submittal of an adopted periodic review task. Jurisdiction: City of Tigard Local file no.: CPA2015-00005,ZON2015-00007 Date of adoption: 2/2/2016 Date sent: 2/11/2016 Was Notice of a Proposed Change (Form 1) submitted to DLCD? Yes: Date(use the date of last revision if a revised Form l was submitted): 11/5/2015 No Is the adopted change different from what was described in the Notice of Proposed Change? Yes No If yes, describe how the adoption differs from the proposal: Yes Local contact (name and title): Gary Pagenstecher, Associate Planner Phone: 503-718.-2434 E-mail: garyp@tigard-or.gov Street address: 13125 SW Hall Blvd. City: Tigard Zip: 97223- PLEASE COMPLETE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS THAT APPLY For a change to comprehensive plan text: Identify the sections of the plan that were added or amended and which statewide planning goals those sections implement,if any: For a chance to a comprehensive plan map: Identify the former and new map designations and the area affected: Change from M to CG 1.37 acres. A goal exception was required for this change. Change from to acres. A goal exception was required for this change. Change from to acres. A goal exception was required for this change. Change from to acres. A goal exception was required for this change. Location of affected property(T, R, Sec., TL and address): 13125 SW Pacific Hwy TAX MAP/ LOT#2S102CB00200 The subject property is entirely within an urban growth boundary The subject property is partially within an urban growth boundary !t p. v,vwwv.or cry �avJL," Pa- s�fo�€ >. ti 1- Form updated November 1,2013 If the comprehensive plan map change is a UGB amendment including less than 50 acres and/or by a city with a population less than 2,500 in the urban area, indicate the number of acres of the former rural plan designation,by type, included in the boundary. Exclusive Farm Use—Acres: Non-resource—Acres: Forest—Acres: Marginal Lands—Acres: Rural Residential—Acres: Natural Resource/Coastal/Open Space—Acres: Rural Commercial or Industrial—Acres: Other: —Acres: If the comprehensive plan map change is an urban reserve amendment including less than 50 acres, or establishment or amendment of an urban reserve by a city with a population less than 2,500 in the urban area, indicate the number of acres,by plan designation, included in the boundary. Exclusive Farm Use Acres: Non-resource—Acres: Forest—Acres: Marginal Lands—Acres: Rural Residential—Acres: Natural Resource/Coastal/Open Space—Acres: Rural Commercial or Industrial—Acres: Other: —Acres: For a change to the text of an ordinance or code: Identify the sections of the ordinance or code that were added or amended by title and number: For a change to a zoning map: Identify the former and new base zone designations and the area affected: Change from R-12 to C-G Acres: 1.37 Change from to Acres: Change from to Acres: Change from to Acres: Identify additions to or removal from an overlay zone designation and the area affected: Overlay zone designation: NA Acres added: Acres removed: Location of affected property(T, R, Sec., TL and address): 13125 SW Pacific Hwy TAX MAP/LOT#2S102CB00200 List affected state or federal agencies, local governments and special districts: DLCD, Metro Identify supplemental information that is included because it may be useful to inform DLCD or members of the public of the effect of the actual change that has been submitted with this Notice of Adopted Change, if any. If the submittal, including supplementary materials, exceeds 100 pages, include a summary of the amendment briefly describing its purpose and requirements. Planning Commission Recommendation to City Council (Exhibit B to Ordinance No. 16-05) http_/ www arccn, ayj4�as�for rs, ¢fix -2- Form updated November 1,2013 CI'1Y Ol`'1'1(j.1RD, (AU'GON TIG,ARI)CITY CUUNCII. ORDINANCE: NO. 16- .AN ORDINANCE AIX)PTING C0NIPRFl-11?NBIN'1? PLAN ANlJ:NDMFNI' CP.i 2015-00005 ANI) /()NJ," CHANGF WN 22015-00007 `1'0 ANIFND 'THI; TIGAIM CONIPIUMENSINT PLAN DI-SIGN.\'1'IONS ,AND /.ONING DISTRICTS NIAP. WHVRF,AS, Section 18.380.030 of the Citi- of'Tigard (:0tnMUn1*tV Development Code requires quasi-judicial amendments to be undertaken by means of a Type IN' procedure ,vhen a zone change application also involves a concurrent application for a comprehensive plan map amendment, as governed be Section 18.390.060;and \VHl,.R1,:.18, the city has proposed an amendment to the 'Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map to facilitate Preservation of R-12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that suPPorts residential use, and WHER],\S, on December 14, 2015, the 'Tigard Planning; Commission held a public hearing, which was noticed in accordance with city- standards, and recommended approval of the proposed CPA 2015-OODU5/ /.ON 2015-00007 by motion with a 6-1 rote in favor; and Wl11"RHAS, on )anuan- 12, 2016, the Tigard City Council held a public hearing, which was noticed ill accordance with city standards, to consider the Cornmission's recommendation on CTA 2015-00005/XON 2015-051007, hear public testimonv, and apple applicable decision-making criteria; and W1II?It I'AS, on Jarluan- 12, 2016, the 'Tigard Cite Council continued the hearing for CPA 2015- O0005/%ON 2015-00007 to Fcbruan- ?, 2016 to consider testimony from interested parties; and \VI IFRJ`.AS, on Fcbniary ?, 2016, the 'Tigard City Council approved (J'A2015-00005/%ON 2015-00007 Nvith amendments. WI-11"RE.AS, Council's decision to approve CP_A 2015-00005/XON 2015-00007 and adopt this ordinance was based on the findings and conclusions found in 1:1shibits "B" and "C" and the associated land use record which is incorporated herein by reference and is contained in land use file CI'.A 2015-!10()05//_,ON 2015-00007, NONY','THl?RI?1.ORl','I'H1? CITY 01�'TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SVIC TION 1: 'Tigard Cite Council amends the 'Tigard Comprehensive ]'lan Map to change tllc Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning Districts as shown in 1?shibit ".A" for the School Street Site. SFICI'ION ?: 'Tigard Cine Council adopts the findings and conclusions contained in 1?shibits "I3" and "C" in support of the Council's action and to be the legislative basis for this ordinance. ORDINANCE No. Page I The Cit,- Council finds that the immediate applicability of the ncxv zone to the subject pr(.)pertA- in I?shibit"X' provided in this Ordinance is necessart- to facilitate development of the propertA- in a timely manner. S1?(;"PION I: har the reasons set forth in lection 3, an emergency is declared ofx eist and this Ordinance takes effect upon adoption by the (;it,' COUncil and signature of the Mayor. P.ASSI D: Bvll'�le'Z�1 tl?�2 �?-- \-otc of alI Council members present after being read by number and title onl°, this -.4`9 day of e c t �m 2016. Carol hrager, Ciry Recorder APPR(WFID: By Tigard Citti Council this day r>f Y- r 16. �olttl 1 (,;c,7ctl;, 1Ii�\'ter .lpprot-ed as to form: ("itv .Attorney ORDINANCE No. 16- Page VICINITY MAP CPA 2015-00005 ZON 2015-00007 Medium Residential(R-12' Preservation SITE B R-12 ` Subject Site T*le �rs�fiary� Jr gB12rt-6t1.3'u� te.� . r R-4.S - Appm.SCMs t 2.000.1 P-W01 Map WW at 09:1 i AM-W-Nw 15 V'. �Tf�OIwaROPRCY 4tgiYi,E lAMCl4MClTe OI TAMtl rJ'i tGGVM�tViNtMe'�u�W19u�MM�CtCAt10M a F n£MT'A d'AGKl9 X�RItR'.T1/�1rvd11WAD69MiN lvw�til�W 17( �� IMC YNt✓L M MN.I4V tgl.w+lMeO.t. W C�"I prd Fant "",x, _ �ai2s swli�iand 0 250 t aSxB�iaY1 > Exhibit B t4 CITY COUNCIL DECISION FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON An ordinance approving a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment (CPA2015-00005) and Zone Map Amendment (ZON2015-00007) for the 1.37-acre Tigard Tualatin School District property located at 13125 SW Pacific Hwy, Site B, amending the comprehensive plan map from Medium Density Residential (M) to General Commercial (CG) and amending the zoning map from Medium Density Residential (R-12) to General Commercial (C-G). Council remanded to the Planning Commission the proposed rezoning for Site A. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 14, 2015 and City Council held hearings on January 12th and February 2nd, 2016 to receive testimony regarding this application. This decision has been based on the facts, findings and conclusions contained within this decision. SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NO.: Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) 2015-00005 Zone Change (ZON) 2015-00007 FILE TITLE: Consider Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Zoning Changes to Preserve Medium Density (R-12) Residential Land APPLICANT: City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: The City proposes changing the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning District Classifications of the subject parcel SITE B (1 parcel of 1.37 acres) from Medium Density Residential (R-12) to General Commercial (C-G). LOCATION: SITE B: 13125 SW Pacific Hwy TAX MAP/ LOT#2S102CB00200 COMP PLAN DESIGNATION/ ZONING DISTRICT: FROM: Medium Density Residential (R-12) TO: General Commercial (C-G) APPLICABLE Community Development Code Chapters 18.380.020 and 18.390.060.G; REVIEW Comprehensive Plan Goals 1 and 2; Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 10; and CRITERIA: Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Title 1. SECTION II CITY COUNCIL DECISION PLANNING COMMISSION RFsCOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL, CPA 2015-00005/%ON2015-00007 Medium Density Residenrial(R-12)Preservation PAGE 1 OF 14 ,,Through the public hearing process,the-Tigard City Council amended the proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Atnendrnents adoptingby,ordinance onlp the proposed Ccimprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Arhemrnents to Sits B.",,Council i'etiaanded the proposed .Site A Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map `Amendments to Planning Coffimission for review and recommendati6n to Council. SECTION III BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site Description Site A (3 parcels totaling 1.54 acres) is developed with single-family residences and was annexed in 2006 (ZCA2006-00003),which changed the county zone from Commercial Office (OC) to the City's Professional Commercial (C-P) zone, the zone most closely implementing the County's plan map designation. The current zone does not allow residential use, which the market has identified as its highest best use as evidenced by the pre-application conference applications cited above. The subject site is located across Spruce Street from Fred Meyers and within 1,000 feet of Pacific Hwy. Site B (1 parcel of 1.37 acres) is currently a vacant lot owned by the Tigard —Tualatin School District. The site abuts the south side of the Charles F. Tigard Elementary School. The subject property abuts SW Pacific Highway, a Principal Arterial that is designated in the Metro Urban Growth Functional Plan as a High Capacity Transit Corridor. The highway is also maintained and under jurisdictional ownership of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). The site is bordered to the east and west by commercial development. The property is the only parcel located along the highway between McKenzie Street and Canterbury Lane, an approximately 1.12 mile segment that is not currently designated for commercial use. The subject site is approximately .25 miles from the Metro Town Center adopted boundary. Project History The city initiated this Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment to facilitate preservation of R-12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use. Staff proposed the change in response to two development applications, both of which involve R-12 zoning. Two pre-application conferences were held in March and August of 2015 for proposals to rezone from C-P to R-12 or R-25 several contiguous parcels located on SW Spruce and 72nd Avenue (Site A). The owners and interested parties are supportive of the city's proposal to accomplish this. In April 2015 the city received an application for a Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment (CPA2015-0003/ZON2015-00004) for a parcel owned by the school district zoned R-12 with frontage on Pacific Hwy (Site B). The Applicant proposed to change the plan and zoning designation of the site to General Commercial (C-G). In addition to this request, the Applicant requested concurrent Site Development Review approval from the City to allow a 15,085 square foot (SF) specialty retail store with associated parking, circulation, landscaping and site improvements. Those applications were withdrawn, in favor of the city's action to rezone the subject parcels. The staff recommendation to approve the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments at both locations was presented to Planning Commission for consideration in December of 2015. Planning Commission Recommendation On December 14, 2015 the Tigard Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the proposal and PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CFF Y COUNCIL, CPA 2015-00005/ZON2015-00007 Medium Density Residential(R-12)Preservation I?AGV 2 OF 14 make a recommendation to Council. As discussed in greater detail in Section VIII of this report and in the minutes of the hearing, public testimony was received and considered by the Planning Commission as part of their deliberations. At the conclusion of their deliberations, the Planning Commission voted 6 to 1 in favor of a motion recommending City Council adopt the proposed amendments. City Council Decision City Council held hearings on January 12th and February 2nd, 2016 to receive testimony regarding this application. Council determined that the hearing should be processed quasi-judicially instead of legislatively, as originally presented. Staff had provided sufficient quasi-judicial notice and has supplemented the record with findings for quasi-judicial actions as required in 18.380.030. Through the public hearing process, City Council amended the proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments, adopting by ordinance only the proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments to Site B. Council directed that the proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments for Site A be remanded back to the Planning Commission for consideration separately from Site B. The Council's decision by Ordinance 16-05 is supported by the applicable criteria, findings and conclusions for quasi-judicial proceedings, as described in the report below. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE CRITERIA, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS This section contains all the applicable city, state and metro policies, provisions, and criteria that apply to the proposed comprehensive plan amendment and zone change for Site B. Each section is addressed demonstrating how each requirement is met. APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (TITLE 18) Chapter 18.380: 18.380.030 Quasi-Judicial Amendments and Procedures to this Title and Zoning Map Map and Text A. Quasi-judicial amendments. Quasi-judicial zoning map amendments Amendments shall be undertaken by means of a Type III-PC procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.050, using standards of approval contained in subsection D of this section. The approval authority shall be as follows: 3. The commission shall make a recommendation to the council on a zone change application which also involves a concurrent application for a comprehensive plan map amendment. 12.380.030.B. Standards for making quasi-judicial decisions. A recommendation or a decision to approve, approve with conditions or to deny an application for a quasi-judicial amendment shall be based on all of the following standards: 1. Demonstration of compliance with all applicable comprehensive plan policies and map designations; FINDING: The findings in this decision address all applicable comprehensive plan policies and map designations. This standard is met. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL CPA 2015-00005/ZON2015-00007 Medium Density Residential(R-12)Preservation PAGE 3 OE 14 2. Demonstration of compliance with all applicable standards of any provision of this code or other applicable implementing ordinance; and FINDING: The findings in this decision describe how the proposal complies with all applicable Tigard Development Code (Tide 18) standards. 3. Evidence of change in the neighborhood or community or a mistake or inconsistency in the comprehensive plan or zoning map as it relates to the property which is the subject of the development application. FINDING: Site B is in the ownership of the Tigard—Tualatin School District, who had intended to utilize the site for school facilities to serve the community. However, the school district has determined that the site is no longer necessary for its long term capital facilities planning and has elected to surplus the lot. Given this change in the school district's capital facilities planning and considering the fact that the subject site is the only parcel on SW Pacific Highway in the immediate vicinity that is not zoned General Commercial, a proposal to rezone Site B from R-12 to C-G represents a reasonable adjustment of the comprehensive plan and zoning map. The city supports the land owner's interest in a rezone to commercial property because of the deficit of commercially zoned property identified in the Housing Strategies report and because the site, located on a Major Arterial, is more suitable for commercial uses. As identified in the City's most recent BLI map, dated January 1, 2014, the project site has not been identified as buildable, likely due to its ownership by the school district and aggregation with adjoining school properties. Therefore, the conversion of the site's zoning district to C-G will not have a demonstrable effect on the planned residential capacity of the City. On balance, Council can find that the change in the status of the subject TTSD property to surplus represents a change in the neighborhood and that the proposed C-G zone will allow more suitable commercial development along a Major Arterial. This standard is met for Site B. Chapter 18.390: Chapter 18.390.060.G. Decision-making considerations.The Decision- recommendation by the Commission and the decision by the Council Making shall be based on consideration of the following factors: Procedures 1. The Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197; 2. Any federal or state statutes or regulations found applicable; 3. Any applicable Metro regulations; 4. Any applicable comprehensive plan policies; and 5. Any applicable provisions of the City's implementing ordinances. FINDING: Findings and conclusions are provided within this decision for the applicable listed factors on which the recommendation by the Commission and the decision by the Council shall be based. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings above and below, these provisions are met. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CPIY COUNCIL CPA 2015-00005/ZON2015-00007 Medium Density Residential(R-12)Preservation PAGE 4 Ole 14 APPLICABLE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES Chapter 1: Citizen Involvement Goal Ll Provide citizens, affected agencies, and other jurisdictions the opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning process. Policy 2 The City shall define and publicize an appropriate role for citizens in each phase of the land use planning process. Policy 5 The opportunities for citizen involvement provided by the City shall be appropriate to the scale of the planning effort and shall involve a broad cross-section of the community. FINDING: Citizens, affected agencies, and other jurisdictions were given the "opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning process." Several opportunities for participation are built into the Comprehensive Plan amendment process, including: • Public Hearing notification requirements pursuant to Chapter 18.390.060 of the Tigard Community Development Code and Measure 56. Public hearing notice of the Planning Commission and City Council public hearings was sent to the interested parties list (11- 5-15) and all property owners within 500 feet of the subject parcels (11-19-15). Measure 56 Notice was mailed to subject property owners. • A notice was published in the November 19, 2015 issue of The Tigard Times (in accordance with Tigard Development Code Chapter 18.390). The notice invited public input and included the phone number of a contact person to answer questions. The notice also included the address of the City's webpage where the Staff Report to the Planning Commission could be viewed. • Site B was posted with a notice board on November 23, 2015, and again on January 19, 2016 at Council's request. • Posting on the City's web site (11-24-15) CONCLUSION: Based on the findings above, Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 1.1 Policies 2 and 5 are met. Chapter 2: Land Use Planning Goal 2.1 Maintain an up-to-date Comprehensive Plan, implementing regulations and action plans as the legislative basis of Tigard's land use planning program. Policy 1 The City's land use program shall establish a clear policy direction, comply with state and regional requirements, and serve its citizens' own interests. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL CPA 2015-00005/XON2015-00007 Medium Density Residential(1-12)Preservation PAGE 5 OE 14 The goals and policies contained in the Tigard Comprehensive Plan provide the basis for the city's land use planning program. This policy is met. Policy 2 The City's land use regulations, related plans, and implementing actions shall be consistent with and implement its Comprehensive Plan. As described in this staff report, the amendment complies with all applicable statewide planning goals, regional regulations, comprehensive plan policies, and serves the interest of the citizens. This policy is met. Policy 3 The City shall coordinate the adoption, amendment, and implementation of its land use program with other potentially affected jurisdictions and agencies. Potentially affected jurisdictions and agencies were given an opportunity to comment. Any comments that were received are addressed in Section VI: Outside Agency Comments. This policy is met. Policy 5 The City shall promote intense urban level development in Metro designated Centers and Corridors, and employment and industrial areas." The Metro 2040 Growth Concept Map shows that Pacific Hwy, through Tigard, is designated as a "Corridor." The proposal to up-zone Site B from residential to commercial would increase development intensity consistent with the "intense urban level development" envisioned for Metro designated corridors. This policy is met. Policy 6 The City shall promote the development and maintenance of a range of land use types which are of sufficient economic value to fund needed services and advance the community's social and fiscal stability. In a February 22, 2011 Economic Opportunities Analysis (EOA) conducted by Cogan Owens Cogan, LLC and FCS Group the forecasted 20-year vacant land need for commercial, mixed use and industrial lands in the City over the 2011 to 2031 time period was prepared. As noted in Table 7, Page 9 of the EOA, it was determined that the City would need a minimum of 51-acres of vacant commercial land to satisfy its commercial land needs over that 20-year growth period. A moderate estimate of commercial land need of 68-acres was identified and a high forecasted need of 85-acres was projected. As noted in the January 1, 2014 BLI prepared by the City, the City's most recent vacant lands inventory identified an existing vacant commercial inventory of 46.55-acres. The proposed comprehensive plan and zoning map amendment will help fill this projected deficit of available commercial land by adding 1.37-acres of commercial land to the City's vacant commercial land inventory, thereby improving the City's available commercial development capacity. Furthermore, consistent with this plan policy, the proposed project will enable the transition of the site from school to private commercial use, thereby placing the property back on the public tax rolls and enabling the PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL CPA 2015-00005/ZON2015-00007 Medium Density Residential(R-12)Preservation PAGE 6 Oh 14 generation of property taxes from the newly created development. These projected public revenues will enable the funding of needed City services and advance the community's social and fiscal stability as desired. This Policy is met. Policy 7 The City's regulatory land use maps and development code shall implement the Comprehensive Plan by providing for needed urban land uses including: A. Residential; B. Commercial and office employment including business parks; C. Mixed use; D. Industrial; E. Overlay districts where natural resource protections or special planning and regulatory tools are warranted; and F. Public services According to Chapter 9, Economic Development of the City of Tigard comprehensive plan, approximately 85 percent of Tigard residents work outside of the City limits. Additionally, approximately 69 percent of the existing land in the City is zoned for residential use, while 31 percent is zoned for commercial, industrial, and mixed use development. The zone change will ensure that this balance of residential and employment uses in the City is maintained with a gain of 1.37 acres zoned C-G. This policy is met. Policy 15 In addition to other Comprehensive Plan goals and policies deemed applicable, amendments to Tigard's Comprehensive Plan/Zone Map shall be subject to the following specific criteria: A. Transportation and other public facilities and services shall be available, or committed to be made available, and of sufficient capacity to serve the land uses allowed by the proposed map designation; B. Development of land uses allowed by the new designation shall not negatively affect existing or planned transportation or other public facilities and services; The transportation impacts for Site B have been detailed in the Transportation Impact Analysis prepared by Kittelson & Associates, Inc., dated July 15th, 2015. As described in the report, the project site can be developed while maintaining acceptable levels of service and safety on the existing transportation system. No changes in street classifications are necessary. However, the report recommends limiting movements at the SW School Road intersection with SW Pacific Highway to right-in, right-out, and left-in. The northeastern driveway access to the site from SW Pacific Highway will also be restricted and will be limited to a right-in and right-out to ensure safe access from SW Pacific Highway. The TPR `Future Conditions Analysis' on page 9 of the report identifies the potential impacts that the existing zoning and proposed zone change could have on the surrounding transportation system using reasonable worst-case development conditions. A detailed review of how the proposed zone change PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL CPA 2015-00005/7.ON2015-00007 Medium Density Residential OZ-12)Preservation PAGE 7 OF 14 complies with the TPR begins on page 24 of the analysis. Proposed recommended mitigation measures are found on Page 25. Future development of the site will be required to implement these mitigation measures. Additional public services such as stormwater, water and sanitary sewer will connect to existing infrastructure and it is not anticipated that the proposed designation changes to G-C will result in additional demands on public services. This policy is met. C. The new land use designation shall fulfill a proven community need such as provision of needed commercial goods and services, employment, housing, public and community services, etc. in the particular location, versus other appropriately designated and developable properties; Site B's conversion to C-G from R-12 would fulfill a proven community need for employment and provision of goods in that location. The City's 2011 Economic Opportunities Analysis (EOA) forecast a 20-year vacant land need for commercial, mixed use and industrial lands in the City over the 2011 to 2031 time period was prepared. As noted in Table 7, Page 9 of the EOA, it was determined that the City would need a minimum of 51- acres of vacant commercial land to satisfy its commercial land needs over that 20-year growth period. A moderate estimate of commercial land need of 68- acres was identified and a high forecasted need of 85-acres was projected. As noted in the January 1, 2014 BLI prepared by the City, the City's most recent vacant lands inventory identified an existing vacant commercial inventory of 46.55-acres. The proposed comprehensive plan and zoning map amendment will help fill this projected deficit of available commercial land by adding 1.37-acres of commercial land to the City's vacant commercial land inventory, thereby improving the City's available commercial development capacity. Furthermore, consistent with this plan policy, the proposed project will enable the transaction of the site from school to private commercial use, thereby placing the property back on the public tax rolls and enabling the generation of property taxes from the newly created development. These projected public revenues will enable the funding of needed City services and advance the community's social and fiscal stability as desired. Lastly, the proposed comprehensive plan amendment will help create employment opportunities for residents of Tigard, which currently sees approximately 85 percent of its employees work in other communities, according to Chapter 9, Economic Development of the City of Tigard comprehensive plan. This Policy is met. D. Demonstration that there is an inadequate amount of developable, appropriately designated, land for the land uses that would be allowed by the new designation; PLANNING COMMISSION RUCOMMENDATION TO CI'T'Y COUNCIL CPA 2015-00005/XON2015-00007 Medium Density Residential(1 42)Preservation PAG1 8 OF 14 As noted above for Site B, there is a projected minimum deficit of vacant commercial land of approximately 4.45-acres. The proposed comprehensive plan and zoning map amendment will reduce this projected deficit by approximately 1.37-acres. E. Demonstration that land uses allowed in the proposed designation could be developed in compliance with all applicable regulations and the purposes of any overlay district would be fulfilled; F. Land uses permitted by the proposed designation would be compatible, or capable of being made compatible, with environmental conditions and surrounding land uses; and The proposed zones in Site B would allow uses compatible with adjacent uses; there is no reason to believe the property could not be developed in conformance with C-G standards. There is no overlay district on the subject properties. This policy is met. G. Demonstration that the amendment does not detract from the viability of the City's natural systems. The subject property has been previously developed and is predominantly flat land without any sensitive natural resources. The proposed rezone would not detract from the viability of the City's natural systems. This policy is met. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings above, Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 2.1 Policies 1, 2, 3, 6,7, 14, and 15 are met. Chapter 10: Housing Goal 10.1 Provide opportunities for a variety of housing types at a range of price levels to meet the diverse housing needs of current and future City residents. Policy 1 The City shall adopt and maintain land use policies, codes, and standards that provide opportunities to develop a variety of housing types that meet the needs, preferences and financial capabilities of Tigard's present and future residents. Currently, approximately 69% of land is zoned for residential land uses. As noted in the January 1, 2014 BLI conducted by the City, there are a total of 34.26 acres of land zoned R-12 that are vacant. Due to the property's ownership by the school district and school related development being present on the site, the property was not included in the BLI—as identified in the City's most recent BLI map, dated January 1, 2014.Additionally, the project site has not been identified as buildable, likely due to its ownership by the school district and aggregation with adjoining school properties. Therefore, the conversion of the site's zoning district to C- G will not have a demonstrable effect on the planned residential capacity of PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL CPA 2015-00005/ZON2015-00007 Medium Density Residential(R-12)Preservation PAGh:9 01,14 the City. This policy is met. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings above, Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 10.1 Policy 1 is met. APPLICABLE METRO REGULATIONS Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Title 1: Housing Capacity The Regional Framework Plan calls for a compact urban form and a "fair-share" approach to meeting regional housing needs. It is the purpose of Title 1 to accomplish these policies by requiring each city and county to maintain or increase its housing capacity. 3.07.120 Housing Capacity A. A city or county may reduce the minimum zoned capacity of the Central City or a Regional Center, Town Center, Corridor, Station Community or Main Street under subsection D or E. A city or county may reduce its minimum zoned capacity in other locations under subsections C, D or E. Site B is located on Pacific Hwy, designated a "Corridor" in the Regional Framework Plan. Therefore, the proposed rezone of Site B from R-12 to C-G, reducing the minimum zoned capacity of R-12 zoned land,is subject to subsection D or E. E. A city or county may reduce the minimum zoned capacity of a single lot or parcel so long as the reduction has a negligible effect on the city's or county's overall minimum zoned residential capacity. Due to the property's ownership by the school district and school related development being present on the site, the property was not included in the Buildable Lands Inventory (BLI)—as identified in the City's most recent BLI map, dated January 1, 2014. Therefore, the conversion of the site's zoning district to C-G will not have a demonstrable effect on the minimum zoned residential capacity of the City. This policy is met. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings above, Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Title 1 is met. THE STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS AND GUIDELINES ADOPTED UNDER OREGON REVISED STATUTES CHAPTER 197 The City's Comprehensive Plan incorporated the Statewide Planning Goals and was acknowledged by the state as being in compliance with state law; therefore, the Statewide Goals are addressed under the Comprehensive Plan Policies Sections. The following Statewide Planning Goals are applicable: Goal 1: Citizen Involvement; Goal 2: Land Use Planning;Goal 10: Housing. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING RULE COMPLIANCE OAR Section 660-12-0060 Plan and Land Use Regulation Amendments (1) If an amendment to a functional plan, an acknowledged comprehensive plan, or a land use regulation (including a zoning map) would significantly affect an existing or planned transportation facility, then the local government must put in place measures as provided in section PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL CPA 2015-00005/ZON2015-00007 Medium Density Residential(IZ-12)Preservation PAGE 10 Oh 14 (2) of this rule, unless the amendment is allowed under section (3), (9) or (10) of this rule.A plan or land use regulation amendment significantly affects a transportation facility if it would: (a) Change the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility (exclusive of correction of map errors in an adopted plan); The proposed C-G zone for Site B will not require or result in any changes to the functional classification of any transportation facility in the vicinity of the site. (b) Change standards implementing a functional classification system; or The proposed C-G zoning will not require or result in any changes to the standards that implement the functional classification system. (c) Result in any of the effects listed in paragraphs (A) through (C) of this subsection based on projected conditions measured at the end of the planning period identified in the adopted TSP. As part of evaluating projected conditions, the amount of traffic projected to be generated within the area of the amendment may be reduced if the amendment includes an enforceable, ongoing requirement that would demonstrably limit traffic generation, including, but not limited to, transportation demand management. This reduction may diminish or completely eliminate the significant effect of the amendment. (A) Types or levels of travel or access that are inconsistent with the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility; The proposed C-G zoning for Site B will result in future traffic volumes and access in a manner consistent with the functional classification of OR 99W in the study area. Although a component of the C-G zoning site trips are expected to travel behind the subject property along SW School Road and SW Grant Avenue, due to a proposed left turn egress restriction at the OR 99W/SW School Road intersection, the amount is minor and should not be any more significant than the buses that frequented this route when the subject site property was a bus storage facility for the Tigard-Tualatin School District. (B) Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility such that it would not meet the performance standards identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan; or The proposed C-G zoning for Site B will degrade the operational performance of the SW School Road/SW Garrett Street/OR 99W intersection with a v/c ratio of greater than 3.0 for the SW School Road approach under year 2035 weekday p.m. peak hour conditions (Appendix H, Kittelson July 15, 2015 TIA). This finding results in a "significant effect" determination, but is remedied by the site access control measures recommended in this report. (C) Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility that is otherwise projected to not meet the performance standards identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan. The OR 99W/SW Walnut Street intersection is projected to fail with a v/c ratio of 1.03 under year 2035 weekday p.m. peak hour conditions assuming development under the current R-12 zoning. However, because the v/c ratio remains the same at 1.03 under the proposed C-G zoning development scenario, the performance of this intersection is not degraded further. Therefore, a finding of"significant effect" is not triggered by this section of the TPR. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMLNDATION TO CI'IY COUNCIL, CPA 2015-00005/XON2015-00007 Medium Density Residential 01-12)Preservation PAGE 11 01e14 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The proposed C-G zoning for the subject site has the potential to create a significant affect at an aligned OR 99W/SW School Road/SW Garrett Street intersection. This significant affect can be remedied by the following mitigation measures, which are recommended to be applied to any future commercial development of the site through Site Development Review: • Maintain the current SW School Road alignment and access to OR 99W, but restrict turn movements to right-in/right-out/left-in only by constructing a raised concrete island and traffic separator in the center median lane of the highway. • Close the current site access to OR 99W across from SW Garrett Street, and construct a new site driveway near the northern property limits. The new driveway would be effectively restricted to right-in/right-out only movements due to the raised traffic separator that already exists in the median lane of the highway SECTION V. ADDITIONAL CITY STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard's Current Planning Division, Development Services Division (Engineering), and Public Works Department had an opportunity to review this proposal and had no objections. SECTION VI. OUTSIDE AGENCY COMMENTS The following agencies/jurisdictions had an opportunity to review this proposal and did not respond: Metro Land Use and Planning, Clean Water Services, Tigard Tualatin School District #23J, Washington County, Department of Land Use and Transportation, Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development. Oregon Department of Transportation, Region 1 reviewed this proposal and provided a comment letter dated December 2, 2015 from Marah Danielson, ODOT Development Review Planner. ODOT determined that for Site A (7303 SW Spruce St), vehicle trips to OR 99W intersections will likely be reduced and that the proposed zone change from C-P to R-12 does not significantly affect a state highway facility. ODOT determined that for Site B (13135 SW Pacific Highway), vehicle trips to OR 99W intersections at Walnut and Park under the proposed zone change from R-12 to C-G would not significantly affect a state highway facility. ODOT supports proposed mitigations to address the safety concern of introducing more vehicle turning conflicts at School Street onto OR 99W and recommends the following conditions on subsequent development of the site: 1. Restrict turn movements at the SW School Rd/OR 99W intersection to right-in/right-out/left-in only by constructing a raised concrete island (traffic separator) in the center of OR 99W to prevent vehicles from turning left onto the highway. 2. Close the existing site driveway to OR 99W across from SW Garret St and construction of a new site driveway near the northern property limits (the new driveway location would be restricted to right- in/right-out only movements due to the existing raised traffic separator on the highway). PLANNING COMMISSION RF_.COMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL CPA 2015-00005/ZON2015-00007 Medium Density Residential�Z-12)Preservation PAGE 12 OIC 14 Future applications for development on the property at 13135 SW Pacific Hwy will be required to implement these mitigation measures through Site Development Review. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CI'T'Y COUNCIL, CPA 2015-00005/GON2015-00007 Medium Density Residenrial(R-12)Preservation PAGE 13 OF 14 SECTION VII. INTERESTED PARTIES COMMENTS The Planning Commission received and considered both written and oral comments from residents and stakeholders as part of their deliberations on December 14,2015. Written comments were submitted by the following interested parties: • Jim Long, 10730 SW 72nd Avenue,Tigard, OR 97223, comments submitted at hearing Oral comments were submitted by the following individuals: • Kelly Houssaini,Miller Nash,LLP (Site B representative) • Mathew Zinzer,DOWEL (Site A representative) • Noreen Gibbons 10730 SW 72nd Ave,Portland, OR 97223 • Nancy Tracy, 7310 SW Pine Street,Tigard OR 97223 • Ann and Nathan Murdock, 7415 SW Spruce Street,Tigard OR 97223 Other verbal and written testimony was heard at Council hearings. Listed below are the main highlights from the oral and written comments received. The full text of all comments can be found in the project file and Planning Commission minutes of December 14, 2015 and Council minutes from the January 121h and February 2nd 2016 hearings. Testimony in favor, received from representatives of the school property, is appreciative of the city being pro-active in amending its comp plan and zoning map to better reflect locational characteristics of Site B. Testimony in opposition, received from neighbors, identify the following concerns with respect to future development under the proposed R-12 zone for Site A: Increased traffic and on-street parking, Loss of open space and potentially,blocked views Lot size not in keeping with neighborhood character Preference for retaining the existing C-P zone Objection with the legislative process and notice procedures The City Council was presented copies of all written comments and heard all oral testimony before a motion to approve the proposed amendments for Site B and to remand the Site A amendments to the Planning Commission. The Council found the proposal for Site B to meet all relevant approval criteria pertaining to the issues raised by the public. SECTION VIII. CONCLUSION As demonstrated by the findings above, the proposed amendments to Site B comply with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals, applicable regional, state and federal regulations, the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, and applicable provisions of the City's implementing ordinances. Therefore, through the public hearing process, the Tigard City Council determined to amend the proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments, adopting by ordinance only the proposed changes to Site B. Council remands the proposed Site A Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment to Planning Commission for review and recommendation to Council. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONTO CITY COUNCIL CPA 2015-00005/ZON2015-00007 Medium Density Residential(R-12)Preservation PAGE 14 OF 14 EXHIBIT C City of Tigard Memorandum To: Nlavor John 1,. Cook, Cit-, Councilors From: Tom MCGUIrc, assistant Cot-111111-111 , DCN-cloprncnt Dircctor Gan, Pagenstccher, associate Planncr Re: Quasi-Judicial bindings in Support of()rdinancc A and/«r B for Conprchcnsi_\-c Plan Amendment (CPA) 2015-00005/Zone Change (ZON) 2015-11(10(17 Date: Fcbruan- 2, 2016 Background 'I'lic cite has initiated a legislative Comhreheusive Plan and Zoning Map an-ierndmctut to facilitate pre°sen:tion of R-12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use in support of the City's I Iousing Goal. At its lanuan- 12"' hearing, Council continued the hearing to clarify procedural issues raised in public tcstimom. The Circ, .lttorne\- has determined that the R-12 Presern-atiotl application should be processed cluasi- judicioush• rather than legislative!\% Although staff alread\- took the extra step of providing quasi-judicial notice of the hearings, there must be additional findiltgs on the substantive standards providcd in tlic Tigard Dcvclopmcnt Code for rcviev�, of (luasi-judicial comprehensive plain amendments and zone changes. l'itidings for quasi-judicial zone cliangcs in TDC 18.380.03(),Ii applicablc to tltc proposal are 1-mvidcd 12.380.030.B. Standards for making quasi-judicial decisions. A recommendation or a decision to approve, approve with conditions or to deny an application for a quasi-judicial amendment shaA be based on all of the following standards: 1. Demonstration of compliance with all applicable comprehensive plan policies and map designations; The Plauuirng Commission Rccotumcndation to Council addresses all applicablc comprehensive plan policies and map designations. 'Phis standard is tact. 2. Demonstration of compliance with all applicable standards of any provision of this code or other applicable implementing ordinance; and The 1'lsutnilig Co emission Reconunendation to Council and this ;Memorandum describe lhov�� the proposal complies xvith all applicablc Tigard I)ct-clopmcnt Codc (I-itic 18) standards. 3. Evidence of change in the neighborhood or community or a mistake or inconsistency in the comprehensive plan or zoning map as it relates to the property which is the subject of the development application. Site A was anne\cd into the city in 2006 (1CA2006-110003) automatically- adopting the (:it- zone (Professional Commercial (C-P)) that «•as closest to the Washington Count), zone (Community Office (CO)) it replaced, consistent with the standards for annexations in 18.320.02O.C. The propertN, owners hoped to open a daycare on the site, a permitted use in the CT zone. Accordingl\,, the Girl- did not Conduct a separ.ttr specific analysis of the zoning of the propert1 at that time. Now, ncarh• 10 N-cars later, without success developing a day care facilin,, the mvners are considering a zone change to Medium Density Resicicntial anticipating market support for residential development. This pronil)ted the Cir\, to evaluate the appropriate plan and zone designations for rhe property. The city's initiative to prescn-e IZ-12 zoned is in alignunent«-itlh Site A omyncrs' interest in developing the propert- for residetltial use. In this case, implementation of cin- housing pofic\ is synergistic \yith market forces in support of ln-eserving the versatile R-12 zone to meet the housing n-pc l)refcrt�occs and financial capabilities of Tigard's present and future residents. In 2013 the Council adopted a Ilousing Strategic-,,, report prepared bv- .Angelo Planning Group and Johnson & Reid in support of the Periodic Rcx-ic«- update to Goal 10, housing. This report illustrated that approximately 69" of the cin's land is zoned for residential lancl uses and that there is about m-ice as much buildable land in areas zoned R-7 (72.1 net buildable acres) than in areas zoned R-1? (36.7 net buildable acres). Tlie report anal\,zed the cit-'s current and future housing needs, vyhich included the fo>llmving conclusions of relevance to the application: o "In general, there is a need for sonic less cspensiyc ownership units and rental units..' o "Single family attached units are projected to meet nearly 20"o of future housing need.' o "it is projected that in coming decades a greater share of housing vyell be attached types, including attached single family." 'Phis type of housing is possible in the R-12 zone, wliich alloys attaclicd and nnilti-faniil housing; on 3,051 .quare-foot lots. Although R-25 also alloys the full range of housing tapes, the medium-high density zotne is less compatible \yith the neighboring lo\y-density residential propert- to the north. .Although the 1 lousing Strategics report also identified a shortfall of commercial property-vyithin the cit-, the proposed swap betarcn Sites A and 13 vyould result in a minimal loss of commercial zoned propert, (17 acres). The increasing importance of ensuring availability of affordable housing is evidence of change in the community that supports the proposed zone change from C-G, to IZ-12 on Site A. This standard is ntct for Site A. Site B is in the ownership of the "Tigard — Tualatin School District, tyho had intended to utilize the site for school facilities to setl-e the comfnunit-. l lovveycr, the school district has determined that the site is uo longer necessary for its long; teen capital facilities planning and has elected to surplus the lot. Givcii this change in the school district's capital facilities planning and considering the fact that the subject site is the ()ill- parcel on SW Pacific Ilighway in the immediate yicinin� that is not zoned General Commercial, a proposal to rezone Site 13 from R-12 to C-G represents a reasonable adjustment of the comprehensive plan and zoning map. The cin- supports the land owner's interest in a rezone to commercial property bCcallse of the deficit of commercially zoned property identified in the 1 lousing Strategies report and because the site, located on a Major arterial, is more suitable for conitnercial uses. As idcntiticd in the City's most recent BBI mnap, dated January 1, 2014, the project site has not been identified as buildable, likely due to its oxviiership by the school district and aggregation with adjoining school properties. Thcreforc, the conversion of the site's zoning district to C-G Evill not have a demonstrable effect oil the planimel residential capacity of the Cin_-. I1o%vcvcr, the planned capacity' is shown to be in deficit. 'I'hcrefore, an increase in tale aivina/capacim of R-12 zoned land undcm-ritten by the proposed swap better meets the city's affordable housing policy. On balance, Council can find that the change in the status of the subject TFM) property to sul-171us represents a change iu the neighborhood and that the proposed C G zone will allow more suitable commercial do:vclopmcnt along a ;Major .Arterial. This standard is met for Site B. The proposed swap between Sites A and B would result in a minimal loss of commercial zoned property (.17 acres) and help ensure availability of land to support a full range of housing nvpes and afti>rdable housing options for Cin- residernts. This standard is met for Sitcs A and B. 120 DAYS = 3/1/2016 DATE OF FILING: 2/4/2016 ,t DATE MAILED: 2/11/2016 CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE CITY COUNCIL Case Number: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 2015-00005, ZON2015- 00007 Case Name: R-12 PRESERVATION PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE Applicant: City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Blvd,Tigard,OR 97223 Owner's Name/Address: Tigard Tualatin School District c/Miller Nash Graham&Dunn LLP Attention: Kelly Hossaini 111 SW 5th Ave,#3400 Portland,OR 97204 Address of Property: Tax Map/Lot Nos.: SITE B: 13125 SW Pacific Hwy TAX MAP/ LOT# 2S102CB00200 An ordinance approving a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment (CPA2015-00005) and Zone Map Amendment (ZON2015-00007) for the 1.37-acre Tigard Tualatin School District property located at 13125 SW Pacific Hwy, Site B, amending the comprehensive plan map from Medium Density Residential (M) to General Commercial (CG) and amending the zoning map from Medium Density Residential (R-12) to General Commercial (C-G). Council remanded to the Planning Commission the proposed rezoning for Site A. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 14, 2015 and City Council held hearings on January 12th and February 2nd, 2016 to receive testimony regarding this application. This decision has been based on the facts, findings and conclusions contained within this decision. Request: ➢ The City proposes changing the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning District Classifications IT of the subject parcel SITE B (1 parcel of 1.37 acres) from Medium Density Residential (R-12) to General Commercial (C-G). Existing Zones: R-12 to Proposed Zones: C-G Applicable Review Criteria: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380 and 18.390.060.G; Comprehensive Plan Goals 1, 2, 10; Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 10; and Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Title 1.0regon Administrative Rule 660, Division 9; the Oregon State Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) 660-012-0060. Action: ➢ Approval as Requested X Approval with Amendment Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to: Zx Owners of Record within the Required Distance Zx Affected Government Agencies 9 Interested Parties Zx The Applicants and Owners Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON FEBRUARY 2,2016 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON FEBRUARY 2 2016 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact,decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, Oregon. Appeal: A review of this decision may be obtained by filing a notice of intent to appeal with the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) according to their procedures within 21 days from DLCD Notice of Adoption (February 11,2016),by March 3,2016 Questions: If you have any questions,please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 718-2434. DLCD FORM 2 NOTICE OF ADOPTED CHANGE FOR DLCD USE TO A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR File No.: LAND USE REGULATION Received: Local governments are required to send notice of an adopted change to a comprehensive plan or land use regulation no more than 20 days after the adoption. (See OAR 660-018-0040). The rules require that the notice include a completed copy of this form. This notice form is not for submittal of a completed periodic review task or a plan amendment reviewed in the manner of periodic review.Use Form 4 for an adopted urban growth boundary including over 50 acres by a city with a population greater than 2,500 within the UGB or an urban growth boundary amendment over 100 acres adopted by a metropolitan service district. Use Form 5 for an adopted urban reserve designation,or amendment to add over 50 acres, by a city with a population greater than 2,500 within the UGB. Use Form 6 with submittal of an adopted periodic review task. Jurisdiction: City of Tigard Local file no.: CPA2015-00005,ZON2015-00007 Date of adoption: 2/2/2016 Date sent: 2/11/2016 Was Notice of a Proposed Change (Form 1) submitted to DLCD? Yes: Date (use the date of last revision if a revised Form 1 was submitted): 11/5/2015 No Is the adopted change different from what was described in the Notice of Proposed Change? Yes No If yes, describe how the adoption differs from the proposal: Yes Local contact (name and title): Gary Pagenstecher, Associate Planner Phone: 503-718-2434 E-mail: garyp@tigard-or.gov Street address: 13125 SW Hall Blvd. City: Tigard Zip: 97223- PLEASE COMPLETE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS THAT APPLY For a change to comprehensive plan text: Identify the sections of the plan that were added or amended and which statewide planning goals those sections implement, if any: For a change to a comprehensive plan map: Identify the former and new map designations and the area affected: Change from M to CG 1.37 acres. A goal exception was required for this change. Change from to acres. A goal exception was required for this change. Change from to acres. A goal exception was required for this change. Change from to acres. A goal exception was required for this change. Location of affected property(T, R, Sec., TL and address): 13125 SW Pacific Hwy TAX MAP/LOT#2S102CB00200 The subject property is entirely within an urban growth boundary The subject property is partially within an urban growth boundary http:j/www_oregon ov LCD Pa es/forms,aspx -1- Form updated November 1, 2013 If the comprehensive plan map change is a UGB amendment including less than 50 acres and/or by a city with a population less than 2,500 in the urban area, indicate the number of acres of the former rural plan designation, by type, included in the boundary. Exclusive Farm Use—Acres: Non-resource—Acres: Forest—Acres: Marginal Lands—Acres: Rural Residential—Acres: Natural Resource/Coastal/Open Space—Acres: Rural Commercial or Industrial—Acres: Other: —Acres: If the comprehensive plan map change is an urban reserve amendment including less than 50 acres, or establishment or amendment of an urban reserve by a city with a population less than 2,500 in the urban area, indicate the number of acres, by plan designation, included in the boundary. Exclusive Farm Use—Acres: Non-resource--Acres: Forest—Acres: Marginal Lands—Acres: Rural Residential—Acres: Natural Resource/Coastal/Open Space—Acres: Rural Commercial or Industrial—Acres: Other: —Acres: For a change to the text of an ordinance or code: Identify the sections of the ordinance or code that were added or amended by title and number: For a change to a zoning map: Identify the former and new base zone designations and the area affected: Change from R-12 to C-G Acres: 1.37 Change from to Acres: Change from to Acres: Change from to Acres: Identify additions to or removal from an overlay zone designation and the area affected: Overlay zone designation: NA Acres added: Acres removed: Location of affected property(T, R, Sec., TL and address): 13125 SW Pacific Hwy TAX MAP/ LOT# 2S102CB00200 List affected state or federal agencies, local governments and special districts: DLCD, Metro Identify supplemental information that is included because it may be useful to inform DLCD or members of the public of the effect of the actual change that has been submitted with this Notice of Adopted Change, if any. If the submittal, including supplementary materials, exceeds 100 pages, include a summary of the amendment briefly describing its purpose and requirements. Planning Commission Recommendation to City Council (Exhibit B to Ordinance No. 16-05) http lwww.oregon. ov LCDPages/forms asoxx -2- Form updated November 1, 2013 MEETING RECORDS ' City of Tigard Memorandum To: Mayor John L. Cook, City Councilors From: Tom McGuire, Assistant Community Development Director Gary Pagenstecher, Associate Planner Re: Quasi-Judicial Findings in Support of Ordinance A and/or B for Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) 2015-00005/Zone Change (ZON) 2015-00007 Date: February 2, 2016 Background The city has initiated a legislative Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment to facilitate preservation of R-12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use in support of the City's Housing Goal. At its January 12`x' hearing, Council continued the hearing to clarify procedural issues raised in public testimony. The City Attorney has determined that the R-12 Preservation application should be processed quasi- judiciously rather than legislatively. Although staff already took the extra step of providing quasi-judicial notice of the hearings, there must be additional findings on the substantive standards provided in the Tigard Development Code for review of quasi-judicial comprehensive plan amendments and zone changes. Findings for quasi-judicial zone changes in TDC 18.380.030.13 applicable to the proposal are provided below: 12.380.030.B. Standards for making quasi-judicial decisions. A recommendation or a decision to approve, approve with conditions or to deny an application for a quasi-judicial amendment shall be based on all of the following standards: 1. Demonstration of compliance with all applicable comprehensive plan policies and map designations; The Planning Commission Recommendation to Council addresses all applicable comprehensive plan policies and map designations. This standard is met. 2. Demonstration of compliance with all applicable standards of any provision of this code or other applicable implementing ordinance; and The Planning Commission Recommendation to Council and this Memorandum describe how the proposal complies with all applicable Tigard Development Code (Title 18) standards. 3. Evidence of change in the neighborhood or community or a mistake or inconsistency in the comprehensive plan or zoning map as it relates to the property which is the subject of the development application. Site A was annexed into the city in 2006 (ZCA2006-00003) automatically adopting the City zone (Professional Commercial (C-P)) that was closest to the Washington County zone (Community Office (CO)) it replaced, consistent with the standards for annexations in 18.320.020.C. The property owners hoped to open a daycare on the site, a permitted use in the C-P zone. Accordingly, the City did not conduct a separate specific analysis of the zoning of the property at that time. Now, nearly 10 years later, without success developing a day care facility, the owners are considering a zone change to Medium Density Residential anticipating market support for residential development. This prompted the City to evaluate the appropriate plan and zone designations for the property. The city's initiative to preserve R-12 zoned is in alignment with Site A owners'interest in developing the property for residential use. In this case, implementation of city housing policy is synergistic with market forces in support of preserving the versatile R-12 zone to meet the housing type preferences and financial capabilities of Tigard's present and future residents. In 2013 the Council adopted a Housing Strategies report prepared by Angelo Planning Group and Johnson & Reid in support of the Periodic Review update to Goal 10, Housing. This report illustrated that approximately 69% of the city's land is zoned for residential land uses and that there is about twice as much buildable land in areas zoned R-7 (72.1 net buildable acres) than in areas zoned R-12 (36.7 net buildable acres). The report analyzed the city's current and future housing needs, which included the following conclusions of relevance to the application: o "In general, there is a need for some less expensive ownership units and rental units." o "Single family attached units are projected to meet nearly 20% of future housing need." o "It is projected that in coming decades a greater share of housing will be attached types, including attached single family." This type of housing is possible in the R-12 zone, which allows attached and multi-family housing on 3,050 square-foot lots. Although R-25 also allows the full range of housing types, the medium-high density zone is less compatible with the neighboring low-density residential property to the north. Although the Housing Strategies report also identified a shortfall of commercial property within the city, the proposed swap between Sites A and B would result in a minimal loss of commercial zoned property (.17 acres). The increasing importance of ensuring availability of affordable housing is evidence of change in the community that supports the proposed zone change from C-G to R-12 on Site A. This standard is met for Site A. Site B is in the ownership of the Tigard —Tualatin School District, who had intended to utilize the site for school facilities to serve the community. However, the school district has determined that the site is no longer necessary for its long term capital facilities planning and has elected to surplus the lot. Given this change in the school district's capital facilities planning and considering the fact that the subject site is the only parcel on SW Pacific Highway in the immediate vicinity that is not zoned General Commercial, a proposal to rezone Site B from R-12 to C-G represents a reasonable adjustment of the comprehensive plan and zoning map. The city supports the land owner's interest in a rezone to commercial property because of the deficit of commercially zoned property identified in the Housing Strategies report and because the site, located on a Major arterial,is more suitable for commercial uses. As identified in the City's most recent BLI map, dated January 1, 2014, the project site has not been identified as buildable, likely due to its ownership by the school district and aggregation with adjoining school properties. "Therefore, the conversion of the site's zoning district to C-G, will not have a demonstrable effect on the planned residential capacity of the City. However, the planned capacity is shown to be in deficit. "Therefore, an increase in the adual capacity of R-12 zoned land underwritten by the proposed swap better meets the city's affordable housing policy. On balance, Council can find that the change in the status of the subject TTSD property to surplus represents a change in the neighborhood and that the proposed C-G zone will allow more suitable commercial development along a Major Arterial.This standard is met for Site B. The proposed swap between Sites A and B would result in a minimal loss of commercial zoned property (17 acres) and help ensure availability of land to support a full range of housing types and affordable housing options for City residents. This standard is met for Sites A and B. AGENDA ITEM No. 5 Date: February 2, 2016 PUBLIC HEARING (QUASI-JUDICIAL) TESTIMONY SIGN-UP SHEETS Please sign on the following page(s) if you wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on: CONSIDER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS AND ZONING CHANGES TO PRESERVE MEDIUM DENSITY (R-12) RESIDENTIAL LAND PROPOSAL: A request to facilitate preservation of R-12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use. The City proposes changing the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning District Classifications of the subject parcels in Site A from Professional Commercial (C-P) to Medium Density Residential (R-12);and changing the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning Map Classifications of the subject parcel in Site B from Medium Density Residential (R-12) to General Commercial(C-G). APPLICANT: City of Tigard 13125 SE Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 OWNER 1: Richard A. Franzke Trust OWNER 2: Ririe Living Trust By Richard A. Franzke,Trustee By David &Mary Louise Ririe, Trustees 14980 SW 133`d Avenue 14920 SW 133`d Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 LOCATION: Site A: 7303 SW Spruce St., 10705 SW 72nd Avenue, 10735 SW 72nd Avenue,Tax map/lot#'s 1S136ACO2200, 1S136ACO2400, 1S136ACO2500, and Site B: 13125 SW Pacific Highway,Tax map/lot# 2S102CB00200 APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380.020 and 18.390.060.G; Comprehensive Plan Goals 1, 2 10: Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 10; and Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Title 1. Due to time Constraints City Council May Impose a Time Limit on Testimony AGENDA ITEM No. 5 Date: Tebruaty 2, 2016 PLEASE PRINT P 't I-C This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony become part of the public record and is openly available to all members of the public. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. Proponent—(Speaking In Favor) Opponent—(Speaking against) Neutral Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. -PI Ni- UZ c 72Z', 7�-17.-846C1 I Name,Address&Phone No. Name,address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Pl n ny �� r` 7 3 S w T 7 9-a3 Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. bu,;(i Name,address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. YF-J 14 641 10 W Name,address&Phone No. Name,address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. ---�-tC-ems (�� �,•��-��, �- AGENDA ITEM No. 5 Date: February 2, 2016 PLEASE PRINT This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony become part of the public record and is openly available to all members of the public. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. Pro onent—(Speaking In Favor) Opponent—(Speaking Against) Neutral Name,Address&Phone No. Name,. dd ess& bo i N Name,Address&Phone No. �r . C° r�-, ' J'` S �7GS- 3 4,61 Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. ff Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. -7 X23 Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. .t��, -b t 16 Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. ''116 sw.�9�'bq rR Lr1r J � 7ZZ i w AGENDA ITEM No. 5 P46a Date: hebruaiy 2, 2016 PLEASE PRINT This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony become part of the public record and is openly available to all members of the public. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. Proponent—(Speaking In Favor) Opponent—(Speaking Against) Neutral Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Adds&Phone Name,Address&Phone No. C� �r�✓1�� CV0 �Ll0 ai {�KX 5 �zV Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Addre h ie o. Name,Address&Phone No. y�r,J r_ 5u 7`Z -7q115 Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Y . y y Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. r �r CC Hearing 2-2-2016 R-12 Comp Plan and Zone Change CPA15-05/ZON15-07 Introduction For the record GBP, rep city as applicant. Kelly Hossaini/Miller Nash for the TTSD; Read Stapleton DOWL Levi Levasa, Stafford Land Co., for Richard and Katherine Topping. Neighbors with Jim Long Chair CPO-4M Materials AIS Attachments: Ordinance (A-Leg) Exhibit A: Site A Exhibit B: Site B Exhibit C: Planning Commission Recommendation Ordinance (A-QJ) Exhibit A: Site A Exhibit B: Site B Exhibit C: Planning Commission Recommendation Exhibit D: QJ Findings Ordinance (B-QJ) Exhibit A: Site B Exhibit B: Planning Commission Recommendation Exhibit C: QJ Findings PC Minutes 12-14-15 Hearing CC Minutes 1-12-16 Long written testimony from 1-12-16 Additions: Background The city is initiating this Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment to facilitate preservation of R-12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use. Staff proposes the change in response to development applications for two sites involving R-12 zoning. Policy Pursuant to the City's housing goal to provide opportunities for a variety of housing types to meet the diverse housing needs of current and future City residents, preservation of R-12 zoned lands is warranted because it allows a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. The zone provides flexibility for both attached and detached ownership and multifamily rental type housing which supports affordable housing options in the city. Attached single-family residential or detached single-family residential on small lots are an important component of the city's strategy to provide for a range of housing types and for providing a more affordable housing type. This is not low-income housing but a level of affordability for first time home buyers, singles, retirees, and other groups that are having a difficult time finding affordable single-family residential options in Tigard's neighborhoods. The timing of the Site B application identified above is such that city staff would have likely recommended denial of the proposed R-12 to C-G zone change to avoid loss of R-12 zoned land. However, the city's proposal combines the zone change proposals at the two sites so that a finding of no net loss of R-12 can be made through the legislative process (net increase of 0.17 acres zoned R-12). And the locational characteristics of the subject parcels otherwise support the comp plan amendments and zone changes. Site A (Exhibit A): In two pre a1212 earlier this year, Owner, Toppings, showed interest in rezoning from C-P to R-12. The Toppings had earlier annexed the property and zoned it C-P to establish a specific use-child care in 2008. The Site fronts on a local and a neighborhood street and is adjacent to property zoned R-4.5 and low-density unincorporated Washington County to the north and C-G and R4.5 to the south. The adjacent lower class streets and low density residential use zone makes the property more suitable for medium residential use that forms a transition between commercial and low density residential uses. Site B (Exhibit B): Owner, TTSD, applied to rezone the site from R-12 to C-G. The Tigard- Tualatin School District has identified the subject property, as surplus and intends to sell it for the highest best use. An a1212lication for zone change and site development review on the subject property has been withdrawn in favor of the city's proposed zone change. The site fronts Pacific Hwy (classified as Primary Arterial) and is flanked by properties zoned C-G. Residential-zoned land adjacent to Pacific Hwy is rare in Tigard and is primarily associated with private and public school ownership and use, which is allowed conditionally in residential zone, and topographically constrained land between Canterbury Ln and Bull Mt. Road At the 12-14-15 PC hearing, the Commission voted 6-1 in favor: supporting the city's initiative to preserve R-12 zoning capacity and to further property owner and development interests for both sites A and B. Comments: Neighbors concerned with increased water runoff, increased traffic, inadequate parking and loss of open space associated with future development. (Section VII,pg 14 of the PC Recommendation). Other New Testimony on 2-2-16 Conclusion: The proposed changes comply with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals, applicable regional, state and federal regulations, the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, and applicable provisions of the City's implementing ordinances. Recommendation: Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that City Council approve the proposed amendments and adopt the amendments by ordinance. Alternatively, deny the proposed zone change on Site A and approve the proposed zone change on Site B in support of the TTSD's rezone proposal (Ordinance B). From: Marty Wine I have approved this item so the packet can be published, and I have some comments about the memo to the Council in response to their questions. I hope you'll be prepared to verbally address these issues if they arise on 2/2. First, I noted that Councilor Woodard asked for a better understanding of the density and form of what can be developed in R-12 zone. I think he will need an illustration of this or something that helps him distinguish between R-4.5, R-7 and R-12. I don't see that addressed in the memo. Slide of Site A Environs including White Oak Village. Hand out You should probably expect someone on the Council to ask what specific controls we now have in place to avoid future errors that occurred here regarding noticing and posting. Proofing protocol/ Double Staking Also, the section at the end titled "staff recommendation" seems limited in its choices. Can the Council do nothing (deny both?), and what are the implications of that option? There are two alternatives listed under this section. Do we recommend them both? (Also, if the purpose of this memo is to respond to questions and public testimony, maybe the best place to have a staff recommendation is in the AIS.) Ord A (AIS Recommendation) Ord B is to salvage% potential benefit Denial is back to square one. New applications to accomplish same end by both parties Appeal to LUBA with possible remand. Recommendations belonged in the AIS I'm also hoping to see the attorney's memo to the Council for executive session when it's ready.Thanks. Exec Session decision to proceed with L or QJ Marty RECEIVED (P•+r Ht�iv„a1 FEB ; �✓a cy L GGL2L � Ciflrttty of riga � iniStrBtOn 7,11 wl 6144 cil qij Ae- r ld VFFICE Dorothy S.Cofield, Attorney at Law Via Hand Delivery To: Mayor Cook and the Tigard City Council t Dorothy S. Cofield,Cofield Law Office Re: Agenda Item 5; Medium Density Residential(R-12) Preservation Zone Change Swap Dt: February 2, 2016 Written Testimony By Dorothy Cofield for Nancy Tracy and Jim Long Procedural Errors: The proposed zone change and comprehensive plan amendment for Site A and Site B is quasi-judicial. "A legislative proceeding is typically not instigated by an application;is not necessarily bound to result in a final or particular decision, and if it does,will adopt new or amended standards or requirements of general applicability to a larger number of properties or people." CLE Land Use,Volume 1, 14.65. CPA 2015-00005 &ZON 2015-00007 were instigated by applications;will result in an ordinance adopting the zone change and plan amendment and only applies to two sites,totally less than 3 acres. Planning Commission Recommendation, p. 1. This proceeding is quasi-judicial and must be processed pursuant to Tigard Development Code (TDC) 18.390.030(B)and 18.390.050 (Type III Procedures). Staff's reasoning that the"swap" is policy to support R-12 housing is not supported by substantial evidence in the record. See Attachment 1, p. 8,Zone Change from R-12 to R-7 and ZON 2015-00006. There is conflicting evidence in the record that the subject applications were both started as individual quasi-judicial applications. See Attachment 6 and Planning Commission Recommendation. The City cannot legally adopt the proposed ordinance as a legislative matter. This matter is quasi-judicial and must meet the zone change criteria at 18.380.030(8) (1-3). There is no evidence of a change in the neighborhood or community or a mistake or inconsistency in the comprehensive plan or zoning map as it relates to Site A. There is conflicting evidence in the record that the current C-P zoning acts as a buffer to the adjacent R 4.5 zoning and the C-G zoning. 1 Creekside 5, Suite .. 1 8705 •. 503.6-1/5-4320 • Even if the city council determines the subject applications are legislative,the city has not followed its code in processing them. TDC 18.390.060(B). The director may only receive such Type IV actions in April and October. These applications were received in September, 2015 and heard by the planning commission in December,2015. There is no identified evidence in the record that the planning director waived any time periods or that the April and October submission deadlines could be waived. The subject applications must be given the protections of a quasi-judicial proceeding as set out in ORS 197.763 and the Tigard Development Code. The published notice and the mailed notice both show the wrong standards and criteria. See Attachments 4 and 5. The mailed and newspaper notice were not given 20 days before the hearing as required under the quasi-judicial provisions at 18.390.060(D). The posted notice blew down several times as documented in the record. The commercial realtor sign gives the impression the Site B property is already zoned commercial. See Jim Long Photographs in Record. Conditions of Approval can be imposed on a quasi-judicial decision to protect the surrounding properties. TDC 18.380.030(C). The notice and process errors prejudiced my clients and the public's right to a full and fair opportunity to be heard. Converting this continued hearing into a quasi-judicial proceeding will further prejudice hearing rights because the notice does not reflect the quasi-judicial zone change standards. See Written Testimony of Jim Long, dated February 2, 2016. Even if the applications could be processed as legislative in nature,the description of the zone swap to preserve R-12 zoning does not reflect the substance of the proposal. The rezoning from CP to R-12 is not preserving R-12 zoning where none has existed: Nor does it explain why the City is the instigating the action rather than the two property owners. See Attachment 6. Read together with the commercial real estate sign on the Site B property, my clients and the citizens of Tigard have not had a full and fair opportunity to participate in the zone change. Substantive Errors There is conflicting evidence in the record that the City is deficient in commercial land.The fact tht the Attachment 2, p. 22 (Deficiency of 19-45 Acres of Commercial and Mixed Use 20-Year Supply). y just approved a 6-acre R-12 zone change to R-7 on Hall Street is further evidence the City has no need for"preserving R-12" land. See Attachment 1, p. 8. There is no evidence in the record that there is a need for additional R-12 land. See Attachment 7, p.4, 30. One of the alleged reasons for the zone change swap as supported by the Housing Strategies report is the need for some less expensive ownership and rental units. There is nothing in the record on whether Site A will have"less expensive ownership and rental units"which appears to be housing between $250,000 to $350,000. Nor is there any indication the attached housing on Site A will be rental units with rents between$1770-$3,530. Attachment 7 on p. 30 cites a need for mixed use land in the Highway 99 area. Site A as presently zoning CP, along with the adjacent retail use (Fred Meyer) and the neighboring R 4.5 is already a mixed use area. The R-12 is not a mixed use zone but a pure residential zone (except for the allowance of some civic uses). There is no support in Attachment 7 that the City is deficient in R-12 zoning and needs to add more, especially with the Hall St. 6 acre zone change from R-12 to R-7. The reason the staff has given for the "swap" is to have no net loss of R-12 land but Site B has never been counted in the housing inventory so that finding is not credible. See Staff Memorandum to City Council. 2 Rezoning Site A to R-12 will result in spot zoning which is contrary to Oregon's land use planning goals. The surrounding properties are R-4.5 and CG. The City's reasons for the zone change swap are not supported by the record in terms of a lack of public facilities. See Attachment 3 (streets are adequate for CP zoning). The City cannot demonstrate there was a mistake in zoning Site A since after the annexation the City has gone through periodic review and did not change Site A's zoning. Conclusion: We support the City Council adopting the alternative action proposed in the Staff Memorandum: "Deny the proposed zone change on Site A and approve the proposed zone change on Site B(Ordinance B) in support of the TTSD's rezone proposal." Although we support the alternative and the school district's wish to sell surplus property to support the schools,we question whether the City can legally adopt the Site B zone change in a legislative proceeding and with the notice errors we have identified. Submitted Attachments for the Record: 1. DLCD Plan Amendment Notice to Subscribers, November 9, 2015 2. City of Tigard 2011 Economic Opportunities Analysis, Cogan Owens Cogan LLC 3. Zone Change Annexation Staff Report,Topping Kemp Annexation ZCA 2006-00003 4. Affidavit of Publication for CPA 2015-00005 &ZON 2015-00007 5. Notice of Public Hearing, November 9, 2015 for CPA 2015-00005 &ZON 2015-00007 6. Topping Zone Change Pre-Application Conference Notes, March 10, 2015 (Site A)and September 10, 2015 7. Housing Strategies Report,Angelo Planning Group, February, 2013. 3 -Printed Agenda Page 2 of 3 City of 'Tigard CODA City Center Development Agency Board - Agenda TIGARD CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD AND CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE AND TIME: February 2,2016 -6:30 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard-Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 6:30 PTNI 1. CITY CENTER DEVELOPTNI NT AGENCY BOARD MEETING AND CITY COUNCIL A. Call to Order-City Center Development Agency and City Council B. Roll Call C. Pledge of Allegiance D. Call to Board and Staff for Non-Agenda Items CITY COUNCIL 2. EXECUTIVE SESSION:The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session to discuss exempt public records under ORS 192.660(2)(f.All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed.No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision.-6:35 p.m.estimated time CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 3. JOINT MEETING WITH THE CITY CENTER ADVISORY COW\IISSION -6:50 pan. estimated time 4. UPDATE ON THE MAIN STREET/FANNO CREEK SITE (SAXONY)REDEVELOPMENT STUDY-7:35 p.m. estimated time CITY COUNCIL 5. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDTNTENTS AND ZONING CHANGES TO PRESERVE MEDIUM DENSITY(R-12) RESIDENTIAL LAND— 7:55 p.m. estimated time Note: Council may decide to conduct the hearing as a quasi-judicial proceeding,including addressing the following additional standards: Tigard Development Code:12.380.030.B. 1.Demonstration of compliance with all applicable comprehensive plan policies and map designations; 2.Demonstration of compliance with all applicable standards of any provision of this code or other applicable implementing ordinance;and 3.Evidence of change in the neighborhood or community or a mistake or inconsistency in the comprehensive plan or zoning map as it relates to the property which is the subject of the development application. 6. CONTINUED DELIBERATION:APPROVING AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING TMC 3.75 PARKS TNLUNTENANCE FEE AND APPROVING A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE TNL-�STER FEES AND CHARGES SCHEDULE-8:25 p.m. estimated time 7. DISCUSSION ON THE PROPOSED FY 2017 CITY COUNCIL BUDGET-9:25 p.m. estimated time http://agendas.tigard-or.gov/print_agenda.cfm?seq=996&reloaded=true&id=0 2/2/2016 •Printed.Agenda Page 3 of 3 8. NON AGENDA ITEMS 9. ADJOURNMENT-9:40 p.m.estimated time http://agendas.tigard-or.gov/print_agenda.cfm?seq=996&reloaded=true&id=0 2/2/2016 -Print Agenda Item Summary Page 1 of 2 AIS-2538 5. CCDA Agenda Meeting Date: 02/02/2016 Length (in 30 Minutes minutes): Agenda Title: Medium Density Residential (R-12) Preservation Prepared For: Gary Pagenstecher, Submitted By: Carol Krager, Central Services Item Type: Ordinance Meeting Type: Council Business Meeting- Main Public Hearing- Legislative Public Yes Publication Hearing: Date: Information ISSUE Shall Council adopt an ordinance to amend the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning Districts Map to facilitate preservation of R-12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff, and the Planning Commission, by a vote of 6 to 1 in favor, recommend that City Council approve the proposed amendments. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The city has initiated this legislative Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment to facilitate preservation of R-12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use in support of the City's Housing Goal. The Planning Commission voted 6-1 in favor of the proposal. In response to public testimony at its January 12th hearing, Council continued the hearing and directed staff to respond to public testimony to clarify issues related to land use process and to neighborhood livability at Site A. Staff responses are in the attached Memo to Council. The City is initiating the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments to facilitate preservation of R-12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use. Staff proposes the change in response to separate development applications for two sites involving R-12 zoning. Two pre- application conferences were held in March and August of 2015 for proposals to rezone from C-P to R-12 (or R-25) several contiguous parcels located on SW Spruce and 72nd Avenue (Site A). The owners and interested parties are supportive of the City's legislative proposal to accomplish this. In April 2015 the City received an application for a Comp Plan and Zone Change (CPA2015- 00003/ZON2015-00004) for a parcel owned by the Tigard-Tualatin school district zoned R-12 with frontage on Pacific Hwy (Site B). The applicant proposed to change the plan and zoning designation of the site to General Commercial (C-G). In addition to this comprehensive plan and zoning map amendment request, the Applicant requested concurrent Site Development Review approval from the City to allow a 15,085 square foot specialty retail store with associated parking, circulation, landscaping and site improvements. These applications have been withdrawn in favor of the City's legislative action http://agendas.tigard-or.gov/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=253 8&rev_num=0&mode=External&... 2/2/2016 °Print Agenda Item Summary Page 2 of 2 to rezone the subject parcel, as proposed. Pursuant to the City's housing goal to provide opportunities for a variety of housing types to meet the diverse housing needs of current and future City residents, preservation of R-12 zoned lands is warranted because it allows a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. The zone provides flexibility for both attached and detached ownership and multifamily rental type housing which supports affordable housing options in the city. Attached single-family residential or detached single-family residential on small lots are an important component of the city's strategy to provide for a range of housing types and for providing a more affordable housing type. This is not low-income housing but a level of affordability for first time home buyers, singles,retirees, and other groups that are having a difficult time finding affordable single-family residential options in Tigard's neighborhoods. The timing of the applications identified above is such that the City staff would have likely recommended denial of the proposed R-12 to C-G zone change to avoid loss of R-12 zoned land. However, the City's proposal combines the two zone change proposals so that a finding of no net loss of R-12 can be made through the legislative process The locational characteristics of the subject parcels otherwise support the comp plan amendments and zone changes. The property zoned C-P (Site A) fronts on a local and a neighborhood street and is adjacent to property zoned R-4.5 and low-density unincorporated Washington County. The adjacent lower class streets and low density residential use zone makes the property more suitable for medium residential use that forms a transition from the C-G zone to the south and the R-12 zone to the north. Residential-zoned land adjacent to Pacific Hwy is rare in Tigard and is primarily associated with private and public school ownership and use, which is allowed conditionally in residential zones. The Tigard- Tualatin School District has identified the subject property (Site B) as surplus and intends to sell it for the highest best use. The proposed C-G zone is the dominant zone along Pacific Hwy (classified as Primary Arterial) and the existing zone of the adjacent parcels. This action would result in a net increase of 0.17 acres zoned R-12. OTHER ALTERNATIVES COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS NA DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION January 12, 2016 Attachments Ordinance Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C PC Minutes Memo to Council http://agendas.tigard-or.gov/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=253 8&rev_num=0&mode=External&... 2/2/2016 City of Tigard Memorandum To: Mayor John L. Cook, City Councilors From: Gary Pagenstecher, Associate Planner Re: Response to Public Testimony and Council Questions from the January 12, 2016 Council Hearing regarding Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) 2015- 00005/Zone Change (ZON) 2015-00007 Date: January 26, 2016 Background The city has initiated this legislative Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment to facilitate preservation of R-12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use in support of the City's Housing Goal. The Planning Commission voted 6-1 in favor of the proposal. In response to public testimony at its January 12`" hearing, Council continued the hearing and directed staff to respond to public testimony to clarify issues related to land use process and to neighborhood livability at Site A. Public Testimony The property owners and development representatives for Sites A and B testified in favor of the proposed zone changes at Sites A and B. Staff Response: While the City's proposal furthers owners' interests, the city's legislative proposal also implements Comprehensive Plan Goal 10.1 to "provide opportunities for a variety of housing types at a range of price levels to meet the diverse housing needs of current and future City residents." The public interest component of the proposal and the unique opportunity to swap zones in two different locations is the reason the city is processing this as a legislative matter. The City's activism in this matter opportunistically takes advantage of the tithing of development applications to pursue its housing policy through preservation of R-12 zoned land and ensuring it is applied in a location that supports residential use. Neighborhood residents in the vicinity of Site A testified in opposition to the proposed zone change at Site A. Seven neighbors testified that the zone should either remain Professional Commercial, or be changed to Low-Density Residential or to a zone that would preserve open space (Parks and Recreation). General concerns were raised about potential development impacts associated with future development of Site A under the R-12 zone, including loss of character and livability, increased traffic, height, density, and parking, and loss of open space. Neighbor testimony was not opposed to the proposed zone change at Site B. Staff Response: Future development of Site A would be subject to the use and development standards in the Tigard Development Code. It is important to note that both use and development intensity are greater under the existing C-P zone versus the proposed R-12 zone. A brief comparison between the C- P and R-12 zones indicates that a variety of institutional and commercial uses which are permitted outright in the existing C-P zone, are permitted conditionally in the R-12 zone. Some uses such as office and personal service are permitted outright in the C-P zone but are prohibited in the R-12 zone. In addition, several neighbors mentioned objections to the potential height of residential development in the R12. The development standards in the existing C-G zone actually allow more intense development including greater maximum height (C-P: 45' vs R-12: 35') and greater site coverage (C-P: 85% vs R-12: 80%). Jim Long, Chair of CPO-4M (serving East Tigard, Metzger and Durham) submitted written testimony on a number of specific issues,which are addressed here: Testimony asserts that the Type III quasi-judicial process is applicable, not Type IV, and is a detriment to citizen involvement,in this case. Staff Response: In general, legislative actions involve the adoption of law or policy applicable Citywide or to a broad geographical area of the City. Quasi-judicial actions involve the application of existing law or policy to a small area or a specific factual situation. There are different legal requirements for the processing of these two types of actions. In general, quasi-judicial actions require greater notice and procedural protections than do legislative actions. In the Tigard Development Code, Legislative is defined as a land use decision that applies to a large number of individuals or properties (18.120.030.105); Quasi-judicial is defined as an action that involves the application of adopted policy to a specific development application or amendments (18.120.030.143). The city decided to use the Type IV process in support of the city's housing policy because the proposed commercial-to-residential zone swap involved two separate sites and potential modification of important policy issues that would not be possible under a quasi-judicial action. Type III notice requirements that are not required under the Type IV process include notice to property owners within 500 feet of the subject property and posting of a notice on the subject property. The city, however, went beyond the minimum required under the Type IV procedure and instead followed the Type III notice procedures in this case to ensure broader citizen input on an import issue for which the city is an advocate. Testimony asserts a violation of due process, which denies interested parties full and fair opportunity for citizen involvement. Specifically, 1) the posted notices have the wrong date and time for the City Council hearing, had blown down and were not re-erected, 2) the mailed notice included an ineffective phone number, 3) notices were not received by five neighbors within 200 feet, and 4) documents cited in the notice were not available for timely review. Staff Response: 1) All notices included a City Council hearing date of "Tuesday, January 12, 2015," which should have read "2016;" While this error is regrettable, it is an obvious error given the time of year. Regardless,if a person were to be confused by the error they had multiple other sources to consult to confirm the date including by contacting staff directly. 2) Four different types of notices were sent out. The published and posted notices included the correct planner's phone number, but the mailed notice included a typo with one digit incorrect in the planner's phone number. Again, while the error is regrettable, the planners name was clearly spelled out so that they could have been contacted by calling the city and asking for him by name; 3) Notice is sent to property owners, which may partially explain this outcome if the referenced neighbors are not owners. Again, the Type IV procedure does require a notice to specific neighbors. The CD department provided the mailed notice to all property owners within 500 feet as a courtesy to allow them to be part of the process. All neighbors who signed up to testify are owners and are included in the mailed notification list; 4) Notices refer to documents available on file for review by the public. At the time of the request, the staff report and supporting documents had not yet been generated, but were available seven days prior to the Planning Commission hearing, as required. However, at that time Mr. Long met with both John Floyd and Gary Pagenstecher and the details of the proposal were explained to him. Additionally, CD staff have repeatedly offered to answer questions or provide any information that might be requested. Testimony identifies a commercial real estate sign at Site B that does not meet city code and is misleading. Staff Response: While this sign is notable in the context of the proceeding, it is not a material part of the subject land use process. The city is empowered to authorize temporary signs (18.780.100) which are identified as balloons, banners and lawn signs in the code. Commercial real estate signs such as the one identified, are neither prohibited nor authorized and are therefore not regulated in Tigard. Advertising a property currently zoned residential as a commercial property is misleading,which comes at some risk to the realtor. Testimony asserts that the application title "R-12 Preservation" is misleading, that both commercial zoned property and R-12 zoned property are in deficit, that the annexation report creating Site A's C-P zone may support leaving it zoned commercial. Response: The project description accompanying the title helps to clarify the city's intention. The intent of the proposal is to preserve opportunities for R12 zoning. The report does find that both commercial and R-12 zoned lands are in deficit, but the city has specific policies regarding preserving opportunities for housing affordability and diversity that the proposal is focused on. The original annexation application ZCA2006-00003 for Site A approved the zone that was closest to the Washington County zone it replaced, consistent with the standards for annexations in 18.320.020.C. There was no more consideration given to the chosen C-P zone than that. Council Questions Mayor Cook inquired about the notice date error raised in public testimony and requested the site be reposted. Staff Response: The notice date error is addressed above in the staff response to public testimony. Staff reposted both Sites A and B on January 19`h for the February 2, 2016 hearing. Councilor Snider inquired about the process issues raised in public testimony, including appeal of a legislative decision, and whether Site A had ever been considered by the city for use as a park. Staff Response: The process issues are addressed above in the staff response to public testimony. An appeal of a Council legislative decision is heard by the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA). The city's Parks and Facilities manager does not recall Site A ever being brought to the city's attention and specifically, that is was not considered during the Park Bond acquisition process. Councilor Woodard asked what zone applies to the residences along 74`h avenue at Spruce Street, what the parking issue is referred to in the public testimony, and whether other zones, e.g. R-7 were considered in addition to the proposed R-12 zone. Staff Response: The R-4.5 zone flanks SW 74`h Avenue south from Spruce Street until it turns and becomes SW Torchwood Street where the zone becomes R-12(PD) at White Oak Village. Neighbors contend that parking spill over from White Oak Village contributes to cars parking along 74`h. The city's proposal did not consider any zone other than R-12 zoning both because the property owner expressed interest in that zone as an alternative to the existing C-P zone and the city wanted the R-12 zone to avoid its loss on Pacific Hwy. Staff believes that a lower density residential zone would not provide a significant buffer between the commercially zoned property to the south and east and the low-density residential zone to the north, which is an express function of the C-P zone. The site is ideal for R12 zoning given its location near transit and abundant services and there are several similarly zoned R12 areas nearby. Councilor Henderson inquired about the commercial real estate sign identified in public testimony. Staff Response: The commercial real estate sign issue is addressed above in the staff response to public testimony. Staff Recommendation Support the city's housing goal to ensure housing choice and affordability by preserving the R12 zoning and approve the proposed zone changes on Sites A and B (Ordinance A). w Alternatively, deny the proposed zone change on Site A and approve the proposed zone change on Site B (Ordinance B) in support of the TTSD's rezone proposal. 'Printed Agenda Page 3 of 5 City of Tigard Tigard Business Meeting—Aorenda TIGARD CITY COUNCIL & LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE AND January 12, 2016 - 6:30 p.m. Study Session; 7:30 p.m. Business TIME: Meeting MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard - Town Hall - 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 6:30 PM STUDY SESSION • EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session to discuss real property transactions under ORS 192.660(2) (e). All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 6:30 p.m. estimated time COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS 6:45 p.m. estimated time RECEIVE UPDATE FROM METRO COUNCILOR DIRKSEN 7:00 p.m. estimated time 7:30 PM 1. BUSINESS MEETING A. Call to Order B. Roll Call C. Pledge of Allegiance D. Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 2. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION (Two Minutes or Less, Please) http://agendas.tigard-or.gov/print agenda.cfm?seq=986&reloaded=true&id=0 1/12/2016 'Printed Agenda Page 4 of 5 A. Follow-up to Previous Citizen Communication B. Tigard High School Student Envoy C. Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce D. Citizen Communication—Sign Up Sheet 3. CONSENT AGENDA: (Tigard City Council and Local Contract Review Board) These items are considered routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 7:35 p.m. estimated time A. RECEIVE AND FILE: 1. Council Calendar 2. Council Tentative Agenda for Future Meeting Topics B. APPROVE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: • November 24, 2015 • December 8, 2015 C. LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD: CONSIDER IGA WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY FOR ROY ROGERS ROAD IMPROVEMENTS D. CONSIDER AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN THE TIGARD/LAKE OSWEGO ENTERPRISE ZONE INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT • Consent Agenda-Items Removed-for Separate Discussion:Any items requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion will be considered immediately after the Council/City Center DevelopmentAgency has voted on those items which do not need discussion. 4. CONSIDER RESOLUTION APPOINTING CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION MEMBERS 7:40 p.m. estimated time 5. CONSIDER RESOLUTION APPOINTING A PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBER 7:45 p.m. estimated time 6. LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A PARK MAINTENANCE FEE 7:50 p.m. estimated time 7. http://agendas.tigard-or.gov/print—agenda.cfm?seq=986&reloaded=true&id=0 1/12/2016 Printed Agenda Page 5 of 5 LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS AND ZONING CHANGES TO PRESERVE MEDIUM DENSITY (R-12) RESIDENTIAL LAND 8:35 p.m. estimated time 8. CONSIDER AMENDMENT TO CITY MANAGER EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT 9:05 p.m. estimated time 9. LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD CONSIDERATION OF A CONTRACT AWARD TO MURRAY, SMITH AND ASSOCIATES FOR HUNZIKER PROJECT ENGINEERING 9:10 p.m. estimated time 10. DISCUSS PROPOSED FY 2017 CITY COUNCIL BUDGET 9:20 p.m.. estimated time 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive Session is called to order, the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute. All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 12. NON AGENDA ITEMS 13. ADJOURNMENT 9:30 p.m. estimated time http://agendas.tigard-or.gov/print_agenda.cfm?seq=986&reloaded=true&id=0 1/12/2016 Print Agenda Item Summary Page 1 of 2 AIS-2463 7. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 01/12/2016 Length (in 30 Minutes minutes): Agenda Title: Medium Density Residential (R-12) Preservation Submitted By: Gary Pagenstecher, Community Development Item Type: Ordinance Meeting Type: Council Business Meeting- Main Public Hearing- Legislative Public Yes Publication Hearing: Date: Information ISSUE Shall Council adopt an ordinance to amend the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning Districts Map to facilitate preservation of R-12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use? STAFF RECOMMENDATION /ACTION REQUEST Staff, and the Planning Commission,by a vote of 6 to 1 in favor, recommend that City Council approve the proposed amendments. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The City is initiating the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments to facilitate preservation of R-12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use. Staff proposes the change in response to separate development applications for two sites involving R-12 zoning. Two pre- application conferences were held in March and August of 2015 for proposals to rezone from C-P to R-12 (or R-25) several contiguous parcels located on SW Spruce and 72nd Avenue (Site A). The owners and interested parties are supportive of the City's legislative proposal to accomplish this. In April 2015 the City received an application for a Comp Plan and Zone Change (CPA2015- 00003/ZON2015-00004) for a parcel owned by the Tigard-Tualatin school district zoned R-12 with frontage on Pacific Hwy (Site B). The applicant proposed to change the plan and zoning designation of the site to General Commercial (C-G). In addition to this comprehensive plan and zoning map amendment request, the Applicant requested concurrent Site Development Review approval from the City to allow a 15,085 square foot specialty retail store with associated parking, circulation, landscaping and site improvements. These applications have been withdrawn in favor of the City's legislative action to rezone the subject parcel, as proposed. Pursuant to the City's housing goal to provide opportunities for a variety of housing types to meet the diverse housing needs of current and future City residents, preservation of R-12 zoned lands is warranted because it allows a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet.The zone provides flexibility for both attached and detached ownership and multifamily rental type housing http://agendas.tigard-or.gov/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=2463&rev_num=0&mode=External&... 1/8/2016 Print Agenda Item Summary Page 2 of 2 which supports affordable housing options in the city. Attached single-family residential or detached single-family residential on small lots are an important component of the city's strategy to provide for a range of housing types and for providing a more affordable housing type. This is not low-income housing but a level of affordability for first time home buyers, singles, retirees, and other groups that are having a difficult time finding affordable single-family residential options in Tigard's neighborhoods. The timing of the applications identified above is such that the City staff would have likely recommended denial of the proposed R-12 to C-G zone change to avoid loss of R-12 zoned land. However, the City's proposal combines the two zone change proposals so that a finding of no net loss of R-12 can be made through the legislative process The locational characteristics of the subject parcels otherwise support the comp plan amendments and zone changes. The property zoned C-P (Site A) fronts on a local and a neighborhood street and is adjacent to property zoned R-4.5 and low-density unincorporated Washington County. The adjacent lower class streets and low density residential use zone makes the property more suitable for medium residential use that forms a transition from the C-G zone to the south and the R-12 zone to the north. Residential-zoned land adjacent to Pacific Hwy is rare in Tigard and is primarily associated with private and public school ownership and use,which is allowed conditionally in residential zones. The Tigard- Tualatin School District has identified the subject property (Site B) as surplus and intends to sell it for the highest best use. The proposed C-G zone is the dominant zone along Pacific Hwy (classified as Primary Arterial) and the existing zone of the adjacent parcels. This action would result in a net increase of 0.17 acres zoned R-12. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Not approve the proposed amendments. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS NA DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION None Attachments Ordinance Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C PC Minutes http://agendas.tigard-or.gov/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=2463&rev_num=0&mode=External&... 1/8/2016 CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 16- AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 2015-00005 AND ZONE CHANGE ZON 2015-00007 TO AMEND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATIONS AND ZONING DISTRICTS MAP AT TWO SITES. WHEREAS, Section 18.380.020 of the City of Tigard Community Development Code requires legislative amendments to be undertaken by means of a Type IV procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.060;and WHEREAS, the city has proposed an amendment to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map to facilitate preservation of R-12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use;and WHEREAS, on December 14, 2015, the Tigard Planning Commission held a public hearing, which was noticed in accordance with city standards, and recommended approval of the proposed CPA 2015-00005/ ZON 2015-00007 by motion with a 6-1 vote in favor;and WHEREAS, on January 12, 2016, the Tigard City Council held a public hearing, which was noticed in accordance with city standards, to consider the Commission's recommendation on CPA 2015-00005/ZON2015-00007,hear public testimony,and apply applicable decision-making criteria;and WHEREAS,on January 12,2016,the Tigard City Council approved CPA 2015-00005/ZON 2015- 00007 pursuant to the public hearing and its deliberations;and WHEREAS, Council's decision to approve CPA 2015-00005/ZON 2015-00007 and adopt this ordinance was based on the findings and conclusions found in Exhibit "C" and the associated land use record which is incorporated herein by reference and is contained in land use file CPA 2015- 00005/ZON 2015-00007. NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Tigard City Council amends the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map to change the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning Districts as shown in Exhibit "A" and Exhibit`B." SECTION 2 Tigard City Council adopts the findings and conclusions contained in Exhibit "C" in support of the Council's action and to be the legislative basis for this ordinance. SECTION 3: The City Council finds that the immediate ap-pY ili :of the new zones to the subject properties provided in this Ordinance is necessary to protect the p lfare by preservin affordable housing options contained in the City's Comprehensive Plan while at the same timeTacilitating development. ORDINANCE No. 16- Page 1 SECTION 4: For the reasons set forth in Section 3, an emergency is declared to exist and this Ordinance takes effect upon adoption by the City Council and signature of the Mayor. By vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this day of 12016. Carol A.Krager,City Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this day of 52016, John L.Cook,Mayor Approved as to form: City Attorney ORDINANCE No. 16- Page 2 'rN1151 * VICINITY MAP CPA 2015-00005 ZON 2015-00007 Medium Residential (R-12) Preservation SITE A Subject Site C-P to R-12(1.54 acres) - . Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. i Approx.Scale 1:2,000-1 In=161 It aI� Map printed at 09:19 AM on 05-Nov-15 MDATA IS DERIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES.THE CITY OF TIGARD PPP MAKES NO WARRANTY,REPRESENTATION OR GUARANTEE AS TO THE E CONTENT,ACCURACY,TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF ANV OF THE DATA PROVIDED HEREIN,THE CITY OF TIGARD SHALL ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS,OMISSIONS,OR INACCURACIES IN THE INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDLESS OF HOW CAUSED. Gty of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd C Feet 2<C TGAMAPS Tigard,OR 97223 . 503 639-4171 1 p) www.tigardor.gov VICINITY MAP CPA 2015-00005 ZON 2015-00007 Medium Residential (R-12) Preservation SITE B Subject Site .. R-13 ro C-G(1.3?sena) az � I_ � r - 9 1 i. rC, ti o r c R-4.5 7 C- Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. 2 Approx.Scale 1:2.000-1 in=16/ft A Map printed at 09:11 AM on 05-Nov-15 DATA IS DERIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES.THE CITY OF TIGARD MAKES NO WARRANTY REPRESENTATION OR GUARANTEE AS TO THE !') CONTENT.ACCURACY TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY OF THE DATA PROVIDED HEREIN.THE CITY OF TIGARD SHALL ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS,OMISSIONS.OR INACCURACIES IN THE INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDLESS OF HOW CAUSED. IAN yY City of Tlgard� f13125 SW Hall Blvd FEEL n TiGARMAPS Tigard OR 97223 C Z�C � 503 639-0171 = www.tigardor.gov PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON 120 DAYS = N/A SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NO.: Comprehensive Plan Amendment(CPA) 2015-00005 Zone Change (ZON) 2015-00007 FILE TITLE: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R-12) PRESERVATION APPLICANT: City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard,OR 97223 REQUEST: The city is initiating this Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment to facilitate preservation of R-12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use. The City proposes changing the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning District Classifications of the subject parcels in SITE A (3 parcels totaling 1.54 acres) from Professional Commercial (C-P) to Medium Density Residential (R-12); and changing the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning Map Classifications of the subject parcel in SITE B (1 parcel of 1.37 acres) from Medium Density Residential (R-12) to General Commercial (C-G). LOCATION: SITE A: 7303 SW Spruce St., 10705 SW 72nd Ave., 10735 SW 72nd Ave;TAX MAP/ LOT#'s: 1S136ACO2200, 1S136ACO2400, 1S136ACO2500;and SITE B: 13125 SW Pacific Hwy TAX MAP/ LOT# 2S102CB00200 COMP PLAN DESIGNATION/ ZONING DISTRICT: FROM: Medium Density Residential(R-12) and Professional Commercial (C-P) TO: General Commercial (C-G) and Medium Density Residential (R-12) APPLICABLE Community Development Code Chapters 18.380.020 and 18.390.060.G; REVIEW Comprehensive Plan Goals 1, 2, 10; Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 10; and CRITERIA: Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Title 1. PLANNING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL (1T 2015-00005//.ON2015-00007 N-tedium Density Residential(R-12)Preservation PAGF 1 OF 15 SECTION II PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION SECTION III BACKGROUND INFORMATION Project History The city is initiating this Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map amendment to facilitate preservation of R- 12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use. Staff proposes the change in response to two development applications,both of which involve R-12 zoning. Two pre-application conferences were held in March and August of 2015 for proposals to rezone from C-P to R-12 or R-25 several contiguous parcels located on SW Spruce and 72nd Avenue (Site A). The owners and interested parties are supportive of the city's legislative proposal to accomplish this. In April 2015 the city received an application for a Comp Plan and Zone Change (CPA2015- 0003/ZON2015-00004) for a parcel owned by the school district zoned R-12 with frontage on Pacific Hwy (Site B). The Applicant proposed to change the plan and zoning designation of the site to General Commercial (C-G). In addition to this comprehensive plan and zoning map amendment request, the Applicant requested concurrent Site Development Review approval from the City to allow a 15,085 square foot (SF) specialty retail store with associated parking, circulation, landscaping and site improvements. These applications have been withdrawn,in favor of the city's legislative action to rezone the subject parcel, as proposed. Pursuant to the City's housing goal to provide opportunities for a variety of housing types to meet the diverse housing needs of current and future City residents, the affordable housing types allowed in the R-12 zone warrant the need to preserve R-12 zoned lands. The timing of the applications identified above is such that the city staff would have likely recommended denial of the proposed R-12 to C-G zone change to avoid loss of R-12 zoned land. However, the city's proposal combines the two zone change proposals so that a finding of no net loss of R-12 can be made through the legislative process. The locational characteristics of the subject parcels otherwise support the comp plan amendments and zone changes. The property zoned C-P (Site A) fronts on a local and a neighborhood street and is adjacent to property zoned R-4.5 and low-density unincorporated Washington County. The adjacent lower class streets and low density residential use zone makes the property more suitable for medium residential use that forms a transition from the C-G zone to the south and the R-12 zone to the north. Residential-zoned land adjacent to Pacific Hwy is rare in Tigard and is primarily associated with private and public school ownership and use, which is allowed conditionally in residential zones. The Tigard-Tualatin School District has identified the subject property (Site B) as surplus and intends to sell it for the highest best use. The proposed C-G zone is the dominant zone along Pacific Hwy (classified as Primary Arterial) and the existing zone of the adjacent parcels. This action would result in a net increase of 0.17 acres zoned R-12. PLANNING COMMISSION RI�;COM�11?NDi1"CION'1'o CITY COUNCl1, (TA 2015-00005/XoN2015-00007 Medium llcnsity Rcsidclidal(R-12)Preservation PAGV 201 15 Site Description Site A (3 parcels totaling 1.54 acres) is developed with single-family residences and was annexed in 2006 (ZCA2006-00003),which changed the county zone from Commercial Office (OC) to the City's Professional Commercial (C-P) zone, the zone most closely implementing the County's plan map designation. The current zone does not allow residential use, which the market has identified as its highest best use as evidenced by the pre-application conference applications cited above. The subject site is located across Spruce Street from Fred Meyers and within 1,000 feet of Pacific Hwy. Site B (1 parcel of 1.37 acres) is currently a vacant lot owned by the Tigard—Tualatin School District. The site abuts the south side of the Charles F. Tigard Elementary School. The subject property abuts SW Pacific Highway, a Principal Arterial that is designated in the Metro Urban Growth Functional Plan as a High Capacity Transit Corridor. The highway is also maintained and under jurisdictional ownership of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). The site is bordered to the east and west by commercial development. The property is the only parcel located along the highway between McKenzie Street and Canterbury Lane, an approximately 1.12 mile segment that is not currently designated for commercial use. The subject site is approximately .25 miles from the Metro Town Center adopted boundary. Proposal Description The city is initiating this Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment to facilitate preservation of R- 12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use.The City proposes changing the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning District Classifications of the subject parcels in SITE A (3 parcels totaling 1.54 acres) from Professional Commercial (C-P) to Medium Density Residential (R-12); and changing the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning Map Classifications of the subject parcel in SITE B (1 parcel of 1.37 acres) from Medium Density Residential (R-12) to General Commercial (C-G). Planning Commission Recommendation On December 14, 2015 the Tigard Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the proposal and make a recommendation to Council. As discussed in greater detail in Section VIII of this report and in the minutes of the hearing, public testimony was received and considered by the Planning Commission as part of their deliberations. At the conclusion of their deliberations, the Planning Commission voted 6 to 1 in favor of a motion recommending City Council adopt the proposed amendments. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE CRITERIA, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS This section contains all the applicable city, state and metro policies, provisions, and criteria that apply to the proposed comprehensive plan amendment and zone change. Each section is addressed demonstrating how each requirement is met. APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (TITLE 18) Chapter 18.380: Chapter 18.380.020 Legislative Amendments to the Title and Map Zoning Map A. Legislative amendments. Legislative zoning map and text and Text amendments shall be undertaken by means of a Type IV procedure, as Amendments governed by Section 18.309.060G PLANNING CITY COUNCIL (TA 2015-00005//.ON2015-00007 \tedium Dcnsity Residential(R-12)Preservation PAGF 3 OFI5 FINDING: The proposed legislative amendments are being reviewed under the Type IV legislative procedure as set forth in the chapter. This procedure requires public hearings before both the Planning Commission and City Council. Chapter 18.390: Chapter 18.390.020. Description of Decision-Making Procedures Decision- B.4. Type IV Procedure. Type IV procedures apply to legislative Making matters. Legislative matters involve the creation, revision, or large-scale Procedures implementation of public policy. Type IV matters are considered initially by the Planning Commission with final decisions made by the City Council. FINDING: This Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning Districts map involves implementation of city policies as applied generally throughout the City of Tigard. Therefore it will be reviewed under the Type IV procedure as detailed in Section 18.390.060.G. In accordance with this section, the amendment is initially being considered by the Planning Commission with City Council making the final decision. Chapter 18.390: Chapter 18.390.060.G. Decision-making considerations.The Decision- recommendation by the Commission and the decision by the Council Making shall be based on consideration of the following factors: Procedures 1. The Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197; 2. Any federal or state statutes or regulations found applicable; 3. Any applicable Metro regulations; 4. Any applicable comprehensive plan policies; and 5. Any applicable provisions of the City's implementing ordinances. FINDING: Findings and conclusions are provided within this report for the applicable listed factors on which the recommendation by the Commission and the decision by the Council shall be based. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings above and below, these provisions are met. APPLICABLE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES Chapter 1: Citizen Involvement Goal 1.1 Provide citizens, affected agencies, and other jurisdictions the opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning process. Policy 2 The City shall define and publicize an appropriate role for citizens in each phase of the land use planning process. Policy 5 The opportunities for citizen involvement provided by the City shall be appropriate to the scale of the planning effort and shall involve a broad cross-section of the community. FINDING: Citizens, affected agencies, and other jurisdictions weregiven the "opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning process." Several opportunities for PLANNING COMMISSION RI?(;O19ti91?NDA'1'ION'1'O C11Y COUNCIL (TA 2015-00005/ZON2015-00007:Medium Density Residoi ial(K-12)Preservation PAG I?4 OF 15 participation are built into the Comprehensive Plan amendment process, including: • Public Hearing notification requirements pursuant to Chapter 18.390.060 of the Tigard Community Development Code and Measure 56. Public hearing notice of the Planning Commission and City Council public hearings was sent to the interested parties list (11- 5-15) and all property owners within 500 feet of the subject parcels (11-19-15). Measure 56 Notice was mailed to subject property owners. • A notice was published in the November 19, 2015 issue of The Tigard Times (in accordance with Tigard Development Code Chapter 18.390). The notice invited public input and included the phone number of a contact person to answer questions. The notice also included the address of the City's webpage where the Staff Report to the Planning Commission could be viewed. • Both Sites A and B were posted with a notice board on November 23, 2015. • Posting on the City's web site (11-24-15) CONCLUSION: Based on the findings above, Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 1.1 Policies 2 and 5 are met. Chapter 2: Land Use Planning Goal 2.1 Maintain an up-to-date Comprehensive Plan, implementing regulations and action plans as the legislative basis of Tigard's land use planning program. Policy 1 The City's land use program shall establish a clear policy direction, comply with state and regional requirements, and serve its citizens' own interests. The goals and policies contained in the Tigard Comprehensive Plan provide the basis for the city's land use planning program.This policy is met. Policy 2 The City's land use regulations, related plans, and implementing actions shall be consistent with and implement its Comprehensive Plan. As described in this staff report, the amendment complies with all applicable statewide planning goals, regional regulations, comprehensive plan policies, and serves the interest of the citizens. This policy is met. Policy 3 The City shall coordinate the adoption, amendment, and implementation of its land use program with other potentially affected jurisdictions and agencies. Potentially affected jurisdictions and agencies were given an opportunity to comment. Any comments that were received are addressed in Section VI: Outside Agency Comments. This policy is met. PLANNING CONINIISSION RFCONINI !NDATION TO CITY COUNCIL. CPA 2015-00005/'/.ON2015-00007 Nediumn Dcnsity Residential(R-12)Preservation PAGE 5 OF 15 Policy 5 The City shall promote intense urban level development in Metro designated Centers and Corridors, and employment and industrial areas." The Metro 2040 Growth Concept Map shows that Pacific Hwy, through Tigard, is designated as a "Corridor." The proposal to up-zone Site B from residential to commercial would increase development intensity consistent with the "intense urban level development" envisioned for Metro designated corridors. This policy is met. Policy 6 The City shall promote the development and maintenance of a range of land use types which are of sufficient economic value to fund needed services and advance the community's social and fiscal stability. In a February 22, 2011 Economic Opportunities Analysis (EOA) conducted by Cogan Owens Cogan, LLC and FCS Group the forecasted 20-year vacant land need for commercial, mixed use and industrial lands in the City over the 2011 to 2031 time period was prepared. As noted in Table 7, Page 9 of the EOA, it was determined that the City would need a minimum of 51-acres of vacant commercial land to satisfy its commercial land needs over that 20-year growth period. 1\ moderate estimate of commercial land need of 68-acres was identified and a high forecasted need of 85-acres was projected. As noted in the January 1, 2014 BLI prepared by the City, the City's most recent vacant lands inventory identified an existing vacant commercial inventory of 46.55-acres. The proposed comprehensive plan and zoning map amendment will help fill this projected deficit of available commercial land by adding 1.37-acres of commercial land to the City's vacant commercial land inventory, thereby improving the City's available commercial development capacity. Furthermore, consistent with this plan policy, the proposed project will enable the transition of the site from school to private commercial use, thereby placing the property back on the public tax rolls and enabling the generation of property taxes from the newly created development. These projected public revenues will enable the funding of needed City services and advance the community's social and fiscal stability as desired. This Policy is met. Policy 7 The City's regulatory land use maps and development code shall implement the Comprehensive Plan by providing for needed urban land uses including: A. Residential; B. Commercial and office employment including business parks; C. Mixed use; D. Industrial; E. Overlay districts where natural resource protections or special planning and regulatory tools are warranted; and F. Public services According to Chapter 9, Economic Development of the City of Tigard comprehensive plan, approximately 85 percent of Tigard residents work PLANNING COMMISSION RI?CONIN1 41,M)A1'I)N TO CI'T'Y COUNCIL. CTA 2015-00005/'/.ON20I5-00007 Mcdium Dcnsity Residential(R-12)Preservation PAG I?6 01'15 outside of the City limits. Additionally, approximately 69 percent of the existing land in the City is zoned for residential use, while 31 percent is zoned for commercial, industrial, and mixed use development. The proposed zone change will ensure that this balance of residential and employment uses in the City is maintained with a loss of 1.57 acres of land zoned C-P, balanced with a gain of 1.37 acres of C-G (Site B), and 1.37 acres of land zoned R-12 is replaced with 1.57 acres of R-12 (Site A). This policy is met. Policy 15 In addition to other Comprehensive Plan goals and policies deemed applicable, amendments to Tigard's Comprehensive Plan/Zone Map shall be subject to the following specific criteria: A. Transportation and other public facilities and services shall be available, or committed to be made available, and of sufficient capacity to serve the land uses allowed by the proposed map designation; B. Development of land uses allowed by the new designation shall not negatively affect existing or planned transportation or other public facilities and services; ODOT's trip generation analysis for Site A (ODOT Comment letter, dated 12- 2-2015) showed a reduction of trips, from 220 PM trips under the current C-P zone to 43 PM trips under the proposed R-12 zone. Therefore, a determination of no significant adverse effect on the transportation system can be made for Site A. The transportation impacts for Site B have been detailed in the Transportation Impact Analysis prepared by Kittelson & Associates, Inc., dated July 15th, 2015. As described in the report, the project site can be developed while maintaining acceptable levels of service and safety on the existing transportation system. No changes in street classifications are necessary. However, the report recommends limiting movements at the SW School Road intersection with SW Pacific Highway to right-in, right-out, and left-in. The northeastern driveway access to the site from SW Pacific Highway will also be restricted and will be limited to a right-in and right-out to ensure safe access from SW Pacific Highway. The TPR `Future Conditions Analysis' on page 9 of the report identifies the potential impacts that the existing zoning and proposed zone change could have on the surrounding transportation system using reasonable worst-case development conditions. A detailed review of how the proposed zone change complies with the TPR begins on page 24 of the analysis. Proposed recommended mitigation measures are found on Page 25. Future development of the site will be required to implement these mitigation measures. In both Sites A and B, additional public services such as stormwater,water and sanitary sewer will connect to existing infrastructure and it is not anticipated that the proposed designation changes to R-12 for Site A and to G-C for Site B will result in additional demands on public services. This policy is met. PLANNING(:OIvUMISSION RI?COb1M1?NllA"l'ION'IY)CITY COUNCIL CPA 2015-00005/XON2015-00007 iAlcdium llcnsity Residential(R-12)Preservation PAGV 7 OIC 15 C. The new land use designation shall fulfill a proven community need such as provision of needed commercial goods and services, employment, housing, public and community services, etc. in the particular location, versus other appropriately designated and developable properties; Site A's conversion from C-P to R-12 would compensate for the loss of R-12 in Site B. R-12 zoned land permits attached single-family and multi-family housing types, which contribute to the city's variety of more affordable housing stock. Site A is located at 72nd Avenue and Spruce Street, a neighborhood and local street, respectively, and is between land zoned low density residential on the north and general commercial to the south. This site is more suitable to residential use over that of Site B,which fronts Pacific Hwy, an arterial. Site B's conversion to C-G from R-12 would fulfill a proven community need for employment and provision of goods in that location. The City's 2011 Economic Opportunities Analysis (E OA) forecast a 20-year vacant land need for commercial, mixed use and industrial lands in the City over the 2011 to 2031 time period was prepared. As noted in Table 7, Page 9 of the EOA, it was determined that the City would need a minimum of 51- acres of vacant commercial land to satisfy its commercial land needs over that 20-year growth period. A moderate estimate of commercial land need of 68- acres was identified and a high forecasted need of 85-acres was projected. As noted in the January 1, 2014 BLI prepared by the City, the City's most recent vacant lands inventory identified an existing vacant commercial inventory of 46.55-acres. The proposed comprehensive plan and zoning map amendment will help fill this projected deficit of available commercial land by adding 1.37-acres of commercial land to the City's vacant commercial land inventory, thereby improving the City's available commercial development capacity. Furthermore, consistent with this plan policy, the proposed project will enable the transaction of the site from school to private commercial use, thereby placing the property back on the public tax rolls and enabling the generation of property taxes from the newly created development. These projected public revenues will enable the funding of needed City services and advance the community's social and fiscal stability as desired. Lastly, the proposed comprehensive plan amendment will help create employment opportunities for residents of Tigard, which currently sees approximately 85 percent of its employees work in other communities, according to Chapter 9, Economic Development of the City of Tigard comprehensive plan. This Policy is met. D. Demonstration that there is an inadequate amount of developable, appropriately designated, land for the land uses that would be allowed by the new designation; PLANNING COMMISSION RI?COA-iMl?NDATIONTO CITY COUNCIL (TA 2015-00005/XON2015-00007 Medium llensih Residen ial(R-12)Preservation PAG 1?8 OF 15 Rezoning Site A maintains existing R-12 zone capacity. As noted above for Site B, there is a projected minimum deficit of vacant commercial land of approximately 4.45-acres. The proposed comprehensive plan and zoning map amendment will reduce this projected deficit by approximately 1.37-acres. E. Demonstration that land uses allowed in the proposed designation could be developed in compliance with all applicable regulations and the purposes of any overlay district would be fulfilled; F. Land uses permitted by the proposed designation would be compatible, or capable of being made compatible, with environmental conditions and surrounding land uses; and The proposed zones in Sites A and B would allow uses compatible with adjacent uses; there is no reason to believe the property could not be developed in conformance with R-12 and C-G standards. There is no overlay district on the subject properties. This policy is met. G. Demonstration that the amendment does not detract from the viability of the City's natural systems. The subject properties have been previously developed and are predominantly flat land without any sensitive natural resources. The proposed rezone would not detract from the viability of the City's natural systems. This policy is met. Policy 20 The City shall periodically review and if necessary update its Comprehensive Plan and regulatory maps and implementing measures to ensure they are current and responsive to community needs, provide reliable information, and conform to applicable state law, administrative rules, and regional requirements. The city is initiating this Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment to facilitate preservation of R-12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use. Staff proposes the change in response to disparate development community applications (Sites A and B), both involving R-12 zoning. The City's determination to update its Comprehensive Plan and Zoning map through this legislative process will ensure it is current and responsive to community needs and will conform to applicable state law, administrative rules, and regional requirements. This policy is met. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings above, Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 2.1 Policies 1,2, 3,6, 7, 14, 15 and 20 are met. Chapter 10: Housing Goal 10.1 Provide opportunities for a variety of housing types at a range of price levels to meet the diverse housing needs of current and future City residents. PLANNING COMMISSION CITY COUNCll. CPA 2015-00005//.ON2015-00007 1lcdium Density Residenfial(R-12)Preservation 11,1G1?9 OIC 15 Policy 1 The City shall adopt and maintain land use policies, codes, and standards that provide opportunities to develop a variety of housing types that meet the needs, preferences and financial capabilities of Tigard's present and future residents. Currently, approximately 69% of land is zoned for residential land uses. As noted in the January 1, 2014 BLI conducted by the City, there are a total of 34.26 acres of land zoned R-12 that are vacant. As identified in the City's most recent BLI map, dated January 1, 2014, the project site has not been identified as a buildable, likely due to its ownership by the school district and aggregation with adjoining school properties. Therefore, the conversion of the site's zoning district to C-G will not have a demonstrable effect on the planned residential capacity of the City. In 2013 the Council adopted a I lousing Strategies report prepared by Angelo Planning Group and Johnson & Reid in support of the Periodic Review update to Goal 10, Housing. This report illustrated that at that time the city had about twice as much buildable land in areas zoned R-7 (72.1 net buildable acres) than in areas zoned R-12 (36.7 net buildable acres). The report analyzed the city's current and future housing needs, which included the following conclusions of relevance to the application: "In general, there is a need for some less expensive ownership units and rental units." ➢ "Single family attached units are projected to meet nearly 20% of future housing need." ➢ "It is projected that in coming decades a greater share of housing will be attached types,including attached single family." This type of housing is possible in the R-12 zone, which allows attached and multi-family housing on 3,050 square-foot lots. \XVith this legislative action, the loss of R-12 zoning in Site B is replaced by the increase R-12 zoning in Site A, preserving a versatile residential zone to meet the preferences and financial capabilities of Tigard's present and future residents. This policy is met. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings above, Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 10.1 Policy 1 is met. APPLICABLE METRO REGULATIONS Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Title 1: Housing Capacity The Regional Framework Plan calls for a compact urban form and a "fair-share" approach to meeting regional housing needs. It is the purpose of Title 1 to accomplish these policies by requiring each city and county to maintain or increase its housing capacity. 3.07.120 Housing Capacity PLANNING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL (TA 2015-00005%/.oN2015-00007,Medium Density Residential(R-12)Preservation PAG I?10 OIC 15 r A. A city or county may reduce the minimum zoned capacity of the Central City or a Regional Center, Town Center, Corridor, Station Community or Main Street under subsection D or E. A city or county may reduce its minimum zoned capacity in other locations under subsections C, D or E. Site B is located on Pacific Hwy, designated a "Corridor" in the Regional Framework Plan. Therefore, the proposed rezone of Site B from R-12 to C-G, reducing the minimum zoned capacity of R-12 zoned land, is subject to subsection D or E. E. A city or county may reduce the minimum zoned capacity of a single lot or parcel so long as the reduction has a negligible effect on the city's or county's overall minimum zoned residential capacity. As identified in the City's most recent BLI map, dated January 1, 2014, the project site has not been identified as buildable, likely due to its ownership by the school district and aggregation with adjoining school properties. Therefore, the conversion of the site's zoning district to C-G will not have a demonstrable effect on the planned residential capacity of the City. The City's Housing Strategies Report indicates that "in general, there is a need for some less expensive ownership units and rental units." This type of housing is possible in the R-12 zone, which allows attached and multi-family housing on 3,050 square-foot lots. With this legislative action, the loss of R-12 in Site B is replaced by the increase in R-12 in Site A, resulting in a marginal net increase of R-12 zoned land and preserving a versatile residential zone to meet the preferences and financial capabilities of Tigard's present and future residents.This policy is met. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings above, Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Title 1 is met. THE STATENVIDE PLANNING GOALS AND GUIDELINES ADOPTED UNDER OREGON REVISED STATUTES CHAPTER 197 The City's Comprehensive Plan incorporated the Statewide Planning Goals and was acknowledged by the state as being in compliance with state law; therefore, the Statewide Goals are addressed under the Comprehensive Plan Policies Sections. The following Statewide Planning Goals are applicable: Goal 1: Citizen Involvement;Goal 2: Land Use Planning;Goal 10: Housing. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING RULE COMPLIANCE OAR Section 660-12-0060 Plan and Land Use Regulation Amendments (1) If an amendment to a functional plan, an acknowledged comprehensive plan, or a land use regulation (including a zoning map) would significantly affect an existing or planned transportation facility, then the local government must put in place measures as provided in section (2) of this rule, unless the amendment is allowed under section (3), (9) or (10) of this rule. A plan or land use regulation amendment significantly affects a transportation facility if it would: (a) Change the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility (exclusive of correction of map errors in an adopted plan); The proposed R-12 zone for Site A and C-G zone for Site B will not require or result in any changes to the functional classification of any transportation facility in the vicinity of the site. PLANNING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL (;PA 2015-00005/XON2015-00007 Medium Density Residential(R-12)Preservation PAGE 11 Ole 15 (b) Change standards implementing a functional classification system; or The proposed C-G zoning will not require or result in any changes to the standards that implement the functional classification system. (c) Result in any of the effects listed in paragraphs (A) through (C) of this subsection based on projected conditions measured at the end of the planning period identified in the adopted TSP. As part of evaluating projected conditions, the amount of traffic projected to be generated within the area of the amendment may be reduced if the amendment includes an enforceable, ongoing requirement that would demonstrably limit traffic generation, including, but not limited to, transportation demand management. This reduction may diminish or completely eliminate the significant effect of the amendment. (A) Types or levels of travel or access that are inconsistent with the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility; The proposed R-12 zone for Site A will result in future traffic volumes and access in a manner consistent with the functional classification of SW 72nd Avenue, a local street, and Spruce Street, a neighborhood route. ODOT's trip generation analysis for Site A (ODOT Comment letter, dated 12-2-2015) showed a reduction of trips, from 220 PM trips under the current C-P zone to 43 PM trips under the proposed R-12 zone. Therefore, with the reduction of trips under the new zone, the type and level of travel and access would be consistent with the existing functional classification of the transportation facilities. The proposed C-G zoning for Site B will result in future traffic volumes and access in a manner consistent with the functional classification of OR 99W in the study area. Although a component of the C-G zoning site trips are expected to travel behind the subject property along SW School Road and Six' Grant Avenue, due to a proposed left turn egress restriction at the OR 99W/SW School Road intersection, the amount is minor and should not be any more significant than the buses that frequented this route when the subject site property was a bus storage facility for the Tigard-Tualatin School District. (B) Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility such that it would not meet the performance standards identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan; or The proposed C-G zoning for Site B will degrade the operational performance of the SW School Road/SW Garrett Street/OR 99W intersection with a v/c ratio of greater than 3.0 for the SW School Road approach under year 2035 weekday p.m. peak hour conditions (Appendix H, Kittelson July 15, 2015 TIA). This finding results in a "significant affect" determination, but is remedied by the site access control measures recommended in this report. (C) Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility that is otherwise projected to not meet the performance standards identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan. The OR 99W/SW Walnut Street intersection is projected to fail with a v/c ratio of 1.03 under year 2035 weekday p.m. peak hour conditions assuming development under the current R-12 zoning. However, because the v/c ratio remains the same at 1.03 under the proposed C-G zoning development scenario, the performance of this intersection is not degraded further. Therefore, a finding of"significant affect" is not triggered by this section of the TPR. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PLANNING CONVOISSION RI?C0�1�11?NllA'1'U)N'1'O CITY COUNCIL CPA 2015-00005/XoN2015-00007 Medium Dcnsity Residential(R-12)Preservation PAG1?12 OF 15 The proposed C-G zoning for the subject site has the potential to create a significant affect at an aligned OR 99W/SW School Road/SW Garrett Street intersection. This significant affect can be remedied by the following mitigation measures, which are recommended to be applied to any future commercial development of the site through Site Development Review: • Maintain the current SW School Road alignment and access to OR 99W, but restrict turn movements to right-in/right-out/left-in only by constructing a raised concrete island and traffic separator in the center median lane of the highway. • Close the current site access to OR 99W across from SW Garrett Street, and construct a new site driveway near the northern property limits. The new driveway would be effectively restricted to right-in/right-out only movements due to the raised traffic separator that already exists in the median lane of the highway SECTION V. ADDITIONAL CITY STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard's Current Planning Division, Development Services Division (Engineering), and Public Works Department had an opportunity to review this proposal and had no objections. SECTION VI. OUTSIDE AGENCY COMMENTS The following agencies/jurisdictions had an opportunity to review this proposal and did not respond: Metro Land Use and Planning, Clean Water Services, Tigard Tualatin School District #23J, Washington County, Department of Land Use and Transportation, Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development. Oregon Department of Transportation, Region 1 reviewed this proposal and provided a comment letter dated December 2, 2015 from Marah Danielson, ODOT Development Review Planner. ODOT determined that for Site A (7303 SW Spruce St), vehicle trips to OR 99W intersections will likely be reduced and that the proposed zone change from C-P to R-12 does not significantly affect a state highway facility. ODOT determined that for Site B (13135 SW Pacific Highway), vehicle trips to OR 99W intersections at Walnut and Park under the proposed zone change from R-12 to C-G would not significantly affect a state highway facility. ODOT supports proposed mitigations to address the safety concern of introducing more vehicle turning conflicts at School Street onto OR 99W and recommends the following conditions on subsequent development of the site: 1. Restrict turn movements at the SW School Rd/OR 99W intersection to right-in/right-out/left-in only by constructing a raised concrete island (traffic separator) in the center of OR 99W to prevent vehicles from turning left onto the highway. 2. Close the existing site driveway to OR 99W across from SW Garret St and construction of a new site driveway near the northern property limits (the new driveway location would be restricted to right- in/right-out only movements due to the existing raised traffic separator on the highway). Future applications for development on the property at 13135 SW Pacific Hwy will be required to implement these mitigation measures through Site Development Review. PLANNING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL. (:PA 2015-00005/XoN2015-00007 Medium Density Residential(R-12)Preservation PAGI?13 OF 15 SECTION VII. INTERESTED PARTIES COMMENTS The Planning Commission received and considered both written and oral comments from residents and stakeholders as part of their deliberations on December 14, 2015. Written comments were submitted by the following interested parties: • Jim Long, 10730 SW 72nd Avenue, Tigard, OR 97223, comments submitted at hearing Oral comments were submitted by the following individuals: • Kelly Houssaini, Miller Nash,LLP (Site B representative) • Mathew Zinzer, DOWEL (Site A representative) • Noreen Gibbons 10730 SW 72,,d Ave, Portland, OR 97223 • Nancy Tracy, 7310 SW Pine Street, Tigard OR 97223 • Ann and Nathan Murdock, 7415 SW Spruce Street, Tigard OR 97223 Listed below are the main highlights from the oral and written comments received. The full text of all comments can be found in the project file and Planning Commission minutes of December 14, 2015. Testimony in favor, received from representatives of the school property, is appreciative of the city being pro-active in amending its comp plan and zoning map to better reflect locational characteristics of Site B. Testimony in opposition, received from neighbors, identify the following concerns with respect to future development under the proposed R-12 zone for Site A: Increased traffic and on-street parking, Loss of open space and potentially,blocked views Lot size not in keeping with neighborhood character Preference for retaining the existing C-P zone Objection with the legislative process and notice procedures The Planning Commission was presented copies of all written comments and heard all oral testimony before a motion to recommend approval of the proposed amendments. Overall, the Planning Commission found the project to meet all relevant approval criteria pertaining to the issues raised by the public. SECTION VIII. CONCLUSION As demonstrated by the findings above, the proposed changes comply with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals, applicable regional, state and federal regulations, the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, and applicable provisions of the City's implementing ordinances. Therefore, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt by ordinance the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change, as determined through the public hearing process. PLANNING COMMISSION RI�.CO�1R11%Nll;A'190N'lY)CITY COUNCIL, (TA 2015-00005/XON2015-00007 Medium Density Residential(R-12)Preservation PAGE 1401;15 December 7,2015 PREPARED BY: Gary Pagenstecher DATE Associate Planner W� December 7,2015 APPROVED BY: Kenny Asher DATE Community Development Director PLANNING COMMISSION C1TY COUNCIL. CPA 2015-00005/l.ON2015-00007 iAlcdium llcnsity Residential(R-12)Preservation PAG I?15 OF 15 willing to consider. But we're talking about detached single-family lots. We don't want to do attached here. We don't think the neighbors want to see attached here. So if the motion could provide for R-7 on the perimeter, R-12 in the interior islands that you've been referring to,with the proviso that there's got to be a way to meet minimum density—because you'll get a different letter from Metro if we don't meet minimum density - I think we could be comfortable with that. But it's got to be detached lots;we're not offering attached. John Floyd said staff would be willing to work with the applicant if the Planning Commission wants to give direction. He said he would recommend against specifying a specific number of lots —providing the applicant meets the minimum density. President Rogers closed the public hearing. CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING MOTION ON ZONING CHANGE Commissioner Muldoon made the following motion— "Motion is for ZON2015-00006 as proposed but with R-12 for the second island meeting minimum density -working with staff-with detached lots. Seconded by Commission Middaugh A vote was taken. In Favor: Commissioners Muldoon, Middaugh, and Feeney Opposed: Commissioners Lieuallen, Fitzgerald, and Schmidt Abstain—President Rogers Count is 3 for, 3 against, 1 abstention VOTE RESULTS IN A 3 -3 TIE When questioned, the commissioners said they needed to see more before deciding. At this point,it was decided to continue the hearing to get a revised plan which hopefully the commission would be in favor of. After looking at the calendar it was decided to continue to January 25. President Rogers gave a summary to the applicant of what's wanted: "The commission desires to see that R-12 zoning applied to that second island—and again, minimum density requirements applied to the entire development itself" Is that correct, Commissioners? All the commissioners agreed. HEARING IS CONTINUED TO JANUARY 25, 2016 FIVE MINUTE RECESS PUBLIC HEARING MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R-12) PRESERVATION Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) 2015-00005;_Zone Change (ZON) 2015-00007 December 14, 2015 Page 9 of 14 REQUEST: The city is initiating this Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment to facilitate preservation of R-12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use. The City proposes changing the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning District Classifications of the subject parcels in SITE A (3 parcels totaling 1.54 acres) from Professional Commercial (C-P) to Medium Density Residential (R-12); and changing the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning Map Classifications of the subject parcel in SITE B (1 parcel of 1.37 acres) from Medium Density Residential (R-12) to General Commercial (C-G). APPLICANT: City of Tigard LOCATION: SITE A: 7303 SW Spruce St., 10705 SW 72nd Ave., 10735 SW 72nd Ave;TAX MAP/ LOT #'s: 1S136ACO2200, 1S136ACO2400, 1S136ACO2500; and SITE B: 13125 SW Pacific Hwy TAX MAP/ LOT # 2S102CB00200 ZONES: FROM: Medium Density Residential (R-12) and Professional Commercial (C-P) TO: General Commercial (C-G) and Medium Density Residential (R-12) APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380.020 and 18.390.060.G; Comprehensive Plan Goals 1, 2, 10; Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 10; and Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Title 1. STAFF REPORT Associate Planner, Gary Pagenstecher went over the staff report (the staff report is available for viewing and downloading on-line one week before each hearing.) Pursuant to the City's housing goal to provide opportunities for a variety of housing types to meet the diverse housing needs of current and future City residents, the affordable housing types allowed in the R-12 zone warrant the need to preserve R-12 zoned lands. The timing of the applications identified above is such that the city staff would have likely recommended denial of the proposed R-12 to C-G zone change to avoid loss of R-12 zoned land. However, the city's proposal combines the two zone change proposals so that a finding of no net loss of R-12 can be made through the legislative process. The locational characteristics of the subject parcels otherwise support the comp plan amendments and zone changes. The property zoned C-P (Site A) fronts on a local and a neighborhood street and is adjacent to property zoned R-4.5 and low-density unincorporated Washington County. The adjacent lower class streets and low density residential use zone makes the property more suitable for medium residential use that forms a transition from the C-G zone to the south and the R-12 zone to the north. Residential-zoned land adjacent to Pacific Hwy is rare in Tigard and is primarily associated with private and public school ownership and use, which is allowed conditionally in residential zones. The Tigard-Tualatin School District has identified the subject property (Site B) as surplus and intends to sell it for the highest best use. The proposed C-G zone is the dominant zone along Pacific Hwy (classified as Primary Arterial) and the existing zone of the adjacent parcels. This action would result in a net increase of 0.17 acres zoned R-12. Tom McGuire,Assistant Community Development Director, came up and explained in a bit more detail as to why the city is recommending this swap of zoning. "We've had a pre-app and applicant interested in this school district property,wanting to change that zone to C-G and, according to their market research, that was the best use that they were proposing for that property. We've also had two pre-application conferences for the other property—the commercially zoned property - to change that to R-12; but no application has come in. Given the December 14, 2015 Page 10 of 14 other applications that we've had with R-12 zone changes,we wanted to make sure that we are consistent in the findings that we're making on these quasi-judicial cases. Looking at the two sites - we saw that they are just about the same size. The neighborhood commercial is slightly larger and so, given we had interest from both property owners - we had development interests —we looked at that and we thought that it made the most sense to actually step in as a city and legislatively swap those zones. We've got the R-12 residential in a better place for residential zoning off of Hwy 99W and we've got commercial development on Hwy 99W,which makes more sense. Again, as Gary explained, there are two places on 99W zoned residential—the rest of it is all commercial. And those are in areas where there are schools, or were school property - and it was placed there through the conditional use process. So that's just a little more background as to why this decision was made, and why this is before you. STAFF RECOMMENDATION In Section VIII CONCLUSION, Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the proposed amendments to the Tigard City Council as determined through the public hearing process. TESTIMONY IN FAVOR Kelley Hossaini with Miller Nash 111 SW 5th Ave., Suite 3400, Portland 97204— representing the Tigard Tualatin School District— said they are very pleased with staff being pro-active and taking this opportunity to put both of these pieces of property into zones that make more sense given where they are. The property on Hwy 99 has been owned by the School District since the 1940's —maybe even earlier. It was zoned residential to accommodate the district's use of the property. The property was declared as surplus in 2005 and put it on the market in 2006. There was some interest in the property from Commercial uses —no interest whatsoever from anyone wanting to do residential. The property was taken off the market due to the economic downturn. It was put back on the market a couple of years ago and a year ago to Leadership Circle interested in the property and actually wants to put a "Natural Grocer" there which I think would be great to have there and near the elementary school. If the zone change fails there will just be an incorrectly zoned piece of property that will sit there —not on the tax rolls, not providing jobs, taxes for the city—it would just sit there because we've never had any interest whatsoever in a residential use right there on 99. She thinks the zone change makes sense. As a reminder, this is a zone change only—there are no development applications before you. Any concern about the actual workings of what might go on the site— those would best be tackled when applications actually come in. Matthew Zinzer—720 SW Washington St., Suite 750, Portland 97205 works for Dowell, the planning and civil engineers for Leadership Circle, said they have been looking at this "Natural Grocer" and working well with the City of Tigard and ODOT to make sure the site is feasible and we are working diligently for that and we see no issues with the design continuing forward. TESTIMONY IN OPPOSITION Noreen Gibbons —10730 SW 72nd Ave., Portland 97223 — said her property is just across the street from Site A. She bought her property because it was commercially zoned across the street and she didn't believe there would ever be a bunch of houses located there. That was her impetus to buy the property in the first place. She received a letter (notice) in the mail and also saw the sign that was put up on the corner advertising this meeting. She wanted to make a point to say that she December 14, 2015 Page 11 of 14 believes that is very inadequate notification. A day or two after the sign was put up it was curled and now, because of the rain and wind, it's down on the ground. She believes community input is important and she is interested in quality of life. She is concerned about additional traffic and believes this would cause more cars, more congestion. The character of the neighborhood does not match R-12;it will change the character of the neighborhood—and not for the better. Two and three story houses there will cause her to lose her view of Parrot Mountain and it will impact her quality of life. Nancy Tracy—7310 SW Pine St., Tigard 97223 —has lived there for 53 years. Her focus is the value of open space. She believes kids need physical exercise and could be playing out in that area. She believes the city is calling this a done deal. Tigard should make this land available for kids and parents and for walking. She thinks this is being rushed. There should be a moratorium. She would like the city to stop looking at open space as waste land. Nathan Murdock—7415 SW Spruce St. Tigard 97223 —had also submitted a letter which was an exhibit in the staff report. He said most of what he and his wife have to say are on the back of that letter. He is concerned about traffic with safety as the main concern. Parking is a problem now —it would only get worse. He is not opposed to residential but make it residential for what's there and V4 acre lots should be a very minimum. Ann Murdock—7415 SW Pine St., Tigard 97223 —People are parking in front of her home now because of the property at the end of 740, where there are a lot of little homes — four feet apart— with families that have at least 2 cars apiece. It's a mess already; more houses would only add to that mess. She said she may not even be able to get into her driveway. She likes the idea of a park being there instead. Jim Long—10730 SW 72nd Ave., Tigard—spoke on behalf of at least four people so was allowed 15 minutes for testimony - he distributed written testimony. He said that he'd hit heavy traffic getting back and was sorry to have to submit a draft (Exhibit A). He noted that he is the elected chair of CPO-4M, the Citizens Participation Organization serving East Tigard —Metzger and Durham. He said the CPO had voted unanimously to endorse retaining the Commercial- Professional zoning for Site A (the property at the corner of 72nd Ave & SW Spruce Streets. He didn't like the file title — stating that it is a misnomer and really is misleading to citizens. It's not "Residential Preservation" —it's not commercial professional preservation —it's a swap. He hopes it's not a done deal. He stated that the staff report incorrectly states that the current zone does not allow residential use. He tried calling the number listed on the notice to get more information —it was supposed to be Gary Pagenstecher's number but it was somebody else and he said he never got a response back (Monday, December 7). He noted that Code 18.390.053 C2A— Goal 1 of the Comprehensive Plan states that citizens should be involved in every part of the process. He stated that he came in to the city on November 20 to ask to look at the documents and Gary said there weren't any. He doesn't believe that's transparency. Public notices didn't hold up to the weather. He had photos (shown on the written testimony) showing they had blown down on the ground — ineffective—unreadable. He believes this is a violation of due process 197.763. He said this hearing doesn't have the effect it should have. He doesn't like the zone swap being heard as a legislative process instead of a quasi-judicial process. He strongly believes this should be a quasi-judicial proceeding—it allows more citizen involvement and appeal that way. This seems to be highly irregular—it's like the fox watching the henhouse. He noted that he saw a "for sale" sign up on the property and wonders if this a done deal. He spoke about the land not being level — contrary to the staff report. He would like the city to leave this area as commercial. December 14, 2015 Page 12 of 14 Mr. Long stated that the staff report incorrectly states the site description of Site A stating that the current zone does not allow residential use. He said that is wrong because there are two houses on Site A now that have been lived in as residences for decades and that across 72t,d there are residences that are zoned Commercial. He noted several things that the CPO would like to see: All documents that prompted the city to (inaudible) applicant for Comprehensive Plan Amendment in 2015-00005 zone change; the date the application was deemed complete; the affidavit of record; the staff report related to ordinance documents for 2006 annexation of what is now Site A; the housing strategies report by Angelo Planning Group that's referred to; 2010 Cogan Owens Cogan Economic Opportunities Analysis of 2011; the commercial inventory of the city; the residential inventory of the city;population projections; jobs projections; language in the 2006 annexation ordinance that justified the importance of Site A to be commercial-professional. Because of so many outstanding questions, they ask for a continuance for an opportunity to provide more evidence or for the Planning Commission to deny this. They would like the Planning Commission to deny the city Planning's Department request and maintain the existing zoning for Site A. QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS So are you asking to leave Site A the way it is? Commercial? Yes, leave it commercial. It's been for sale for years —maybe they're asking too much. I don't know, but it doesn't seem like there's justification to change it to 3-story high attached houses or whatever it would be —but R-12 would allow something like that, from what I understand. REBUTTAL Gary Pagenstecher,Associate Planner, said his comments (Exhibit A) were distributed to the Planning Commissioners and he doesn't have a copy. He said he doesn't have a rebuttal except that he'd heard issues with process and substance and that there are definite ideas the neighborhood has for this property. "The city has a different idea which we've adequately set forth in the staff report and it's consistent with the current property owner's interest. If the Planning Commission decides to continue, I'm sure I'll have a very specific rebuttal at that point." PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED No further testimony or questions from the audience are allowed. DELIBERATION There was some deliberation over who is for this swap of zones and who is not. The School District is wanting the swap as testified about earlier. Gary pointed out that the city had made a point of including the owners of Site A in the proposal and that they'd agreed with it. The owner is interested in having a residential zone there—they're interested in that because they realize the market is there for residential use but they hadn't found (that market) since it'd been annexed for commercial use. So the city and the current property owners have a consistent goal here —rezoning to a residential use. December 14, 2015 Page 13 of 14 MOTION Commissioner Fitzgerald made the following motion: "I move the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of approval to the City Council of application CPA2015-00005 and Zone Change ZON2015-00007 and adoption of the findings that have been received." Commissioner Feeney seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed 6 — 1;with Commissioner Lieuallen opposing. MOTION PASSES - 6-1 President Rogers noted that the City Council makes the final decision and that this will go to City Council on January 12111. OTHER BUSINESS Tom McGuire reminded the commission that the next Planning Commission meeting will be held on January 11d1 and that it will be a training session. ADJOURNMENT President Rogers adjourned the meeting at 9:34 p.m. Doreen Laughlin, Planning Commission Secretary ATTEST: President Rogers December 14, 2015 Page 14 of 14 Ci1y of Tigard Tigard City Council/LCRB Meeting Agenda January 12, 2016 STUDY SESSION A. At 6:30 p.m. Mayor Cook read the citation for an Executive Session to be held under ORS 192.660 (2) (e) property negotiations. The Executive Session ended at 6:45 p.m. B. Council Liaison Reports were given. C. Metro Councilor Dirksen updated council on SW Corridor decision deadlines,Metro's convention center hotel and a new online feature called Regional Snapshot which gives interesting facts about the region. He brought several handouts have been added to the packet for this meeting. 1. BUSINESS MEETING A. At 7:32 p.m. Mayor Cook called the Tigard City Council and Local Contract Review Board to order. B. City Recorder Krager called the roll. Present Absent Mayor Cook ✓ Councilor Goodhouse ✓ Councilor Henderson ✓ Council President Snider ✓ Councilor Woodard ✓ C. Mayor Cook asked everyone to stand and join him in the Pledge of Allegiance. D. Mayor Cook asked council and staff for any non-agenda items. City Manager Wine had two items to bring forward under Non Agenda items at the end of the meeting. 2. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION A. Follow-up to Previous Citizen Communication—None. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —January 12, 2016 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 of 19 B. Tigard High School Student Envoy—Student Body President Shaina Azbari gave an update on recent and upcoming Tigard High School activities. Over$1,200 was raised by students for the Susan G. Komen Foundation. Team Dom is selling t-shirts and bracelets to raise money for a mother in the community battling cancer. The National Honor Society is doing a coin drive for the Janus Youth Program for homeless youth in the Portland area. The winter choir concert was held. Tigard High students collected gifts to brighten the holiday season for a few needy families. Students wrote holiday cards for patients at Doernbecher Children's Hospital at lunchtime. A Poetry Slam is planned for January 21 and the community is welcome. C. Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce—CEO Debi Mollahan reported that a multi-chamber speed networking event will be held on the first Thursday in February. The Bowl-o-Rama event is scheduled for March 5`h and she encouraged the city council to put together a team. The Shining Stars banquet will be on April 29 and the call for nominations will go out January 13. Nominating information is on the Chamber website. Opening day for the Tigard Farmers Market is April 24 and they are excited about adding some new children activities and a demo garden. The Holiday Tree Lighting event attracted the largest crowd ever. D. Citizen Communication—Summerfield Civic Association Liaison Robert Van Vlack, 15585 S`y/ 109`h Avenue,Tigard,97224,brought a request before the council. When Summerfield was constructed in the 1970s a brick wall was put up along Durham Road. In 2001 the association took over maintenance of the wall. Over the years it has deteriorated and repairs need to be made.The right of way along Durham Road at Summerfield is maintained by the city and he requested that staff remove some underbrush so they can access the wall to make the necessary repairs. He has discussed with Public Works Director Rager. He read a letter from the Summerfield Civic Association which has been added to the packet for this meeting. 3. CONSENT AGENDA: (Tigard City Council and Local Contract Review Board) — A. RECEIVE AND FILE: 1. Council Calendar 2. Council Tentative Agenda for Future Meeting Topics B. APPROVE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: November 24, 2015 December 8, 2015 Local Contract Review Board: TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —January 12, 2016 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 2 of 19 C. CONSIDER IGA WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY FOR ROY ROGERS ROAD IMPROVEMENTS D. CONSIDER AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN THE TIGARD/ LAKE OSWEGO ENTERPRISE ZONE INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT Councilor Woodard moved for approval of the Consent Agenda and Council President Snider seconded the motion. All voted in favor. Yes No Mayor Cook ✓ Councilor Goodhouse ✓ Councilor Henderson ✓ Council President Snider ✓ Councilor Woodard ✓ 4. CONSIDER RESOLUTION APPOINTING CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION MEMBERS Redevelopment Project Manager Farrelly gave the staff report and read brief biographies of the members being appointed. Councilor Henderson thanked them for their service noting that there is a lot of work to be done in the downtown. Councilor Woodard congratulated CCAC Member Schlatter for being a new business owner on Main Street. He said her new food operation will be great for the city. Councilor Henderson moved for approval of Resolution No. 16-01 and Council President Snider seconded the motion. City Recorder Krager read the number and title of the resolution. Resolution No. 16-01 —A RESOLUTION APPOINTING CARINE ARENDES, GINA SCHLATTER,MARK SKORUPA,AND DAVID WALSH AS VOTING MEMBERS OF THE CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION,AND SARA VILLANUEVA AS A NON-VOTING ALTERNATE MEMBER Mayor Cook conducted a vote and announced that Resolution 16-01 passed unanimously. Yes No Mayor Cook ✓ Councilor Goodhouse ✓ Councilor Henderson ✓ Council President Snider ✓ Councilor Woodard ✓ TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —January 12, 2016 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 3 of 19 CCAC Members Gina Schlatter and Carine Arendes were present and received a city pin from Mayor Cook. 5. CONSIDER A RESOLUTION APPOINTING A PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBER Assistant Community Development Director McGuire gave the staff report.This appointment will fill the unexpired term of Planning Commission President Rogers, expiring in 2018. Proposed member Yi-Kang Hu is also a member of the Tigard Transportation Advisory Commission and has agreed to sit on both commissions. Council President Snider moved to approve Resolution No. 16-02 and the motion was seconded by Councilor Goodhouse. City Recorder Krager read the number and title of the resolution. Resolution No. 16-02—A RESOLUTION APPOINTING YI-KANG HU AS A VOTING MEMBER OF THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION TO FILL FORMER COMMISSIONER ROGERS'UNEXPIRED TERM Mayor Cook conducted a vote. Resolution 16-02 passed unanimously. Yes No Mayor Cook ✓ Councilor Goodhouse ✓ Councilor Henderson ✓ Council President Snider ✓ Councilor Woodard ✓ New Planning Commission Member Yi-Kang Hu was present and received a City of Tigard pin from Mayor Cook. 6. LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING—CONSIDERATION OF A PARK MAINTENANCE FEE a. Open Public Hearing - Mayor Cook opened the public hearing and announced that this is a legislative public hearing in which any person shall be given the opportunity to comment. b. Staff Report: Finance and Information Services Director LaFrance gave the staff report. Consultant Todd Chase was also present. Mr. LaFrance said before council was an ordinance to establish a parks maintenance fee and a resolution to amend the master fees and charges schedule. Council discussed this in four Budget Committee meetings and two council workshops. It was also a topic at two Parks and Recreation Board (DRAB) meetings. He said the proposal is closely linked with the Tigard's Strategic Plan Goal 4 which is to fund the vision while also maintaining core services and this proposal for a park maintenance fee does exactly that. It will allow the city to fund and expand park services by 20 percent. Parks relate not only TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —January 12, 2016 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 4 of 19 to walkability through Tigard's trails,but they provide places where people can interconnect, take part in healthy pursuits such as sporting activities,gardening and connecting with neighbors and community members. In addition, this park maintenance fee proposal will allow the city to take something currently funded by the General Fund and give it another funding source. This frees up some of the General Fund and through Budget Committee actions this spring, the city will be able to reinvest up to $1.7 mullion towards core services. As discussed in Budget Committee this does not mean maintaining the same number of staff to provide services to a growing city, but it means growing those services to meet the demands. Mr. LaFrance highlighted citizen outreach that included Cityscape articles,a city park brochure distributed months ago and a webpage dedicated to this subject. A whiteboard video has been accessible to give people a brief summary of this proposal. Citizen input was solicited through the webpage and those unable to attend tonight's meeting were invited to respond in writing. Six responses were received and they were given to council and are part of the record for this hearing. Social media was used to promote this hearing. A PowerPoint was shown and is included in the packet for this meeting. Mr. LaFrance described issues including the budget cuts in 2010 and 2012,population growth increases, and workforce decreases. The city's expenses continue to grow by 4 percent while general fund revenue only rises 3.5 percent. In addition, over the last 15 years park land grew by 66 percent but staffing to maintain the parks has only grown 12 percent. Deferred maintenance gets more expensive the longer it is deferred. SDCs finance capital assets but are not used for maintenance. Seven different level scenarios were described. Council direction from the workshop meetings was to fund only#1 (current level of service) and #2 (deferred maintenance).The fee will be paid by residential and non-residential customers. The annual average cost for the deferred maintenance scenario will be used to level the fee amount. There will be annual inflation factors and council was very interested in a program for low income fee assistance. Council was asked what the fee should be per equivalent dwelling unit per month. They indicated in the workshop meetings that funding park capital projects and recreation might be placed on a property tax levy measure so people could have a vote. C. Council questions of staff Mayor Cook noted that the city had a $17 million park bond which leveraged to $23 million. A percentage went to build capital items in some parks but there was no maintenance aspect added. He said citizens are asking why city did not think of this before. Finance and Information Services Director LaFrance said a general obligation capital bond cannot be used on operations and maintenance. There were specific restrictions. The bond that passed was the second attempt. The first bond measure was broader in scope but community feedback was to focus on purchasing land while it was cheaper during the recession. He said city staff was aware of the fact that the city would need to come up with TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —January 12, 2016 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.dgard-or.gov I Page 5 of 19 ways to fund maintenance of the land but they were unaware that the financial situation would be what it is today. Local government has not experienced an economic recovery. Councilor Goodhouse asked if the un-programmed $400,000 would go into the recently created rainy day fund. Mr. LaFrance said it goes to help keep the fund balance above the minimum requirement expenditures. There is still a structural inequity due to revenues rising slower than expenses but it does buy some time and is sustainable for at least six years. d. Public Testimony Doug Vorwaller, 13267 Woodshire Lane,Tigard,OR 97223, is concerned about this approach. He appreciated the creativity in looking at options but is seeing a lot of other things being addressed other than park maintenance. If park maintenance is being changed from $2.2 million to $2.3 this will not even touch the improvements that need to be made. We probably need $34 million as an annual budget to address the real concern. The utility fee is a good option. He suggested doing the utility fee at 100 percent and then phasing out the city budget line item over five years. City staff could review it at that time. If Tigard is going to be the most walkable city we need to connect some of the trails and that is a new improvement. There are city properties to make some connections but many are wetlands so remediation must be done at additional cost. Scott Winkels, 8366 SW Char Court,Tigard, OR 97224 said he is in favor of the park maintenance fee. His family,including two daughters and a dog, has been active users of the parks system. He complimented Finance and Information Services Director LaFrance for the clear presentation. There are a number of issues with the parks. There are some acquisitions and trails that are in desperate need of assistance. He said he believes the funding method that council has chosen is creative and given Oregon's basket case of a public finance system,is probably one of the few reliable options available. He said he would hate to see the investments that this community approved continue to deteriorate. He said he has spent a great deal of time in these parks and has seen fire fuels buildup,maintenance and public safety issues in the Fields and Dirksen properties. There are extensive homeless camps. He said a well-maintained and usable park and trail system will address a number of these issues. The funding mechanism proposed will create a necessary safety valve to keep the parks budget from having to compete with other vital city services. Lonnie Martinez, 10540 SW Walnut Street,Tigard, OR 97223,addressed having a fee rather than a vote and said he did not want to be forced to pay for something. He said in a democratic world people get a chance to say what they feel is best for them. He said he recently purchased a home here and thinks Tigard is beautiful. He is not opposed to parks but is against being forced to pay for something without a democratic process. He addressed walkability and said he walks from his home to take public transportation but just crossing the street is an issue. When he walks in Tigard he fears a little more for this life than he did when living in Portland. Michel Didin, 12625 SW Snow Bush Court,Tigard, OR 97223 said he was troubled by the shell game aspect of funding the parks system by taking funds from one budget and shoving TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —January 12, 2016 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 6 of 19 it back into others. His other concern is that he opposes something being done in his absence without his vote. He proposed that this matter be put to a vote so all Tigard citizens can express their opinion. James Caster, 7996 SW Ashford Street,Tigard, OR 97224, said when he and his wife retired they bought a home in Tigard and liked the neighborhood very much. Since his wife passed away it has been harder for him to pay the mortgage. Part of the reason is that utility costs have increased greatly. Water bills have doubled. Gas, electric,garbage,insurance and property taxes have all gone up. Like many senior citizens he is on a fixed income and Social Security benefits did not increase. He said in high school civics he learned that the main purpose of government is to provide basic, necessary services for the public,paid for by the citizens. But in the decades that have passed it seems like government's prime directive is to take more and more taxpayer money with no limits in sight and no accountability. Over the past several years the state government spent over$200 million on planning for a bridge that was never built and they wasted $300 million on a health insurance website that never worked. Locally,Tigard wasted nearly$1 million on two ugly,useless sculptures at each end of Main Street. Parks are neither a utility nor a necessity; they are optional extras. They are a luxury and if they are classified as a utility,as seen in the presentation tonight, the costs will keep increasing year by year. He wants to keep his home and requested no additional taxes. He said, "Let's not make Tigard like Portland." Gary Nelson, 15671 SW Summerfield Lane,Tigard OR,97224, said he agreed with the mayor's comments on the acquisition of parkland without identifying how to pay for maintenance. He was on the Ashland Parks Commission as well as one in Billings,MT and also on the Regional Council of the National Parks and Recreation Association (NRPA) so he has a background in this area. In Ashland,whenever a new subdivision was built,initially they would give ten percent of the land to make a small park but found it to be inefficient. It was necessary to haul maintenance equipment to each little park. He sees that Tigard added 30 percent more parkland with virtually no identifiable way to maintain that park land. He said the cart is before the horse right now. He said that needs to be addressed. He asked if this money becomes available to the parks department will the parks manager have exclusive and total control over the funds. He asked if that manager will be able to identify where the money will be spent or would it become part of the political makeup of Tigard. Arthur Molinari, 13209 Woodshire Lane,Tigard,OR 97223,said he moved to Tigard in October but has lived in the area for a long time. He was surprised that his water bill was $100 more than he expected. He looked into it and found that compared to Tualatin Valley Water District (T'VWD),Tigard has 221-110 percent higher meter costs up front and 290- 950 percent higher monthly meter costs. He asked why this is so high. He said his fundamental issue is that the city is considering adding on a fixed cost as opposed to making it a tax which can be written off. He added that it does not encourage conservation. Mayor Cook replied that the water fee difference between the two water providers in Tigard is that in the last eight years the city entered into a partnership with Lake Oswego to construct a $254 million water plant. Tigard's water rates helped to cover that cost. It is TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES -January 12, 2016 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 7 of 19 projected that TVWDs rates will increase even more. Council President Snider added that Tigard's alternative was to keep buying water from Portland and that was even more expensive. Lee Coleman,7170 SW Lola Lane,Tigard, OR 97223, said a park utility fee made about as much sense as adding a fee for road maintenance on his electric bill every month. He said the city could come back at any time and request more fees without much public input. This should go to the ballot so people can vote on it. Claudia Ciobanu, 14180 SW 89`"Avenue,Tigard,OR 97223, said she is a huge proponent of parks and has no problem with the park fee. She said there may be people who were not aware of this public hearing and expressed concern about giving people an opportunity to give input. She suggested a flyer in the water bill. She supported city leadership going forward with this fee to protect the large investment in parks. She said the city's vision is wonderful but she is worried that the sights are being set too short. She noted that council has given staff direction to focus on levels #1 and #2 but the people of Tigard have spoken loudly about their need and desire to have recreation in Tigard. The $10 monthly fee would not cover this. Paying for levels 1-7 would be more like $16 a month and while this could be a significant hit to some people testifying tonight,she would be happy to pay it and help subsidize others in order to achieve the dream of having a recreation program. She was not sure if council could go as high as $16 but suggested seeking input from those who would be affected by this and then examine options in between $10 and $16 by adding 50 cents or one dollar more to start funding a true recreation program in Tigard. e. Council Questions and Discussion Mayor Cook stated that while everyone refers to this as a water bill it does not mean everything on it is a utility. Two-thirds of Tigard receive their water from the city so there is a water charge. There is also a street maintenance fee and a Clean Water Services sewer district fee that is collected for the county. Everyone in Tigard is billed for sewer and the street maintenance fee but one-third of Tigard residents do not receive water from Tigard. The bill is the only mechanism to reach everyone. Mr. LaFrance noted that Section 15.2 in the proposed ordinance says as new parks are acquired or significant developments are made, that information will come to council so they know how this may impact the parks maintenance fee. The idea is not to let the funding source fall behind like it has today. He responded to comments about the higher utility bill and said it is the total cost of city services. Tigard citizens benefit from the lowest property tax rate for any city over 10,000 population in Washington County. When information is provided on the total cost of comparable city services including taxes, from a dollar standpoint Tigard is in the lower half but from the affordability standpoint Tigard is in the middle. The city puts a little more on the utility bill because it gets less from taxes and it all evens out. f. Mayor Cook closed the public hearing. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —January 12, 2016 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 8 of 19 g. Council Deliberation: Councilor Henderson said he wanted sideboards on the fee so council does not end up doing something other than what they said they will do. He heard concerns about whether to mandate this or put it to a vote. Parks are a core value he understands the cost and while we need to invest in our community,it needs to be reasonable. Council President Snider said council consists of five elected officials and this does represent a democratic process. We make decisions and spend taxpayer money every week. He understands that people do not want to be forced to pay for things but Tigard has the lowest tax rate of any city in Washington County that is even close to its size. City expenses are increasing at rates higher than property tax funding mechanisms. He said it is frustrating to be an elected official in an organization where expenses go up faster than revenues can be increased. He does not love increasing costs for services but sometimes council has to make decisions and choices. He is a proponent of moving this off the utility bill and onto a property tax levy. The city has to provide services and cannot continue to manage as it has, with expenses rising by four percent and revenues only going up three and one-half percent. He said people need to be able to plan for increased costs and he supported a phase-in mechanism, even four or five years for the entire$2.7 amount, or placing it on the ballot. Councilor Goodhouse said he wants a phase-in period and a low-income program to help people who cannot afford the increase. He said in the future he would like to take some things off the utility bill and combine them on the property taxes so they can be written off. He said people in the community do not realize the city is bringing in half of the money Beaverton residents pay in taxes and has done a great job but it is not sustainable. He said when you let part of a community degrade it takes longer to bring it up to standard. Councilor Woodard said during the Budget Committee hearings his main concern was keeping the library open on Thursdays. But he is also concerned about the deferred maintenance and the $400,000 to maintain the fund balance. He said unless there is a designated spot for these funds it is hard to explain that to voters. He said he supports 37 percent with a phase-in. He was thinking$2.00 but that will not cover the $400,000. He said there has to be a public process to find out if citizens want to pay out the other 63 percent. He mentioned he would like to have a discussion at a future meeting on some ideas he has on creative and innovative ways to raise money. Mayor Cook said there is too much discussion on what park and what maintenance we are going to do. It is called a park utility fee but the question is what we need in our general fund to cover our general expenses. He said he was in favor of this coming from property taxes and would support a local option levy. He explained that a utility fee amount is the same for everyone. A $200,000 homeowner pays the same fee as a $2 million homeowner. But a property tax would increase with the value of the home and is a tax write-off. He said he was willing to support a 37 percent park maintenance fee but was not willing to ask for$10 because the unallocated money would build up to a large amount that is too large not to be considered by voters in a local option levy. If a levy passes the fee can be repealed. He added that he did not vote for opening the library on Thursdays because he did not want to TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —January 12, 2016 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 9 of 19 vote for something that is not funded. He said the Thursday opening is with a skeleton staff and the city is short$100,000 annually to pay for that. Councilor Snider said it was embarrassing that a city of Tigard's size did not have a seven- day a week library. He said council agreed to open the library and do something like this to fund it. Councilor Goodhouse said his concern was that this amount is a Band-Aid approach. If council will consider 37 percent,why not raise it slightly to 40 or 44? He said it was ridiculous to make this move that will leave the city in the same position in a year or so. Mayor Cook suggested $3.75 with a four-percent inflation factor. City Manager Wine said there are code sections that need to be revised and some scrivener's errors and council has asked for time to review the new documents. The hearing can be held over. Councilor Henderson said the document came from the pavement management program and as he compared the two he noticed some inconsistencies. It refers to capital improvements and a recreation program. Finance and Information Services Director LaFrance said this is the minimum recommendation and gets the city expanded park services, pays for the library, sets aside $400,000. What it does not get to is a continuance of Goal 4. There will not be additional reinvestment into the general fund. Council President Snider suggested the low income program follow the water concept for a 50 percent discount for 12 months. A person could apply once a year. Mayor Cook said the public hearing is closed and deliberation will scheduled for a future council meeting. 7. LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING—CONSIDER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS AND ZONING CHANGES TO PRESERVE MEDIUM DENSITY(R-12) RESIDENTIAL LAND a. Mayor Cook opened the public hearing and announced that it is a legislative public hearing in which any person shall be given the opportunity to comment. b. Staff Report: Associate Planner Pagenstecher gave the staff report. He said the city is initiating this Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendment to facilitate preservation of R- 12 zoned land and to make sure it is applied in a location that supports residential use. Staff supports the change in response to two development applications for two sites involving R- 12 zoning. The owners and representatives of owners are present tonight. In the pre- application meeting for Site A, the owner showed interest in rezoning from CP to R-12. The Toppings had earlier annexed the property and rezoned it to CP in order to establish a day care use in 2008 which they have not moved forward on. Site B is owned by the Tigard- TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —January 12, 2016 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 10 of 19 Tualatin School District and they applied for a rezone from R-12 to CG. It has been identified as surplus property by TTSD and they want to sell it to the highest bidder. The zone change and site development review on Site B has been withdrawn recently in favor of the city's proposed zone change. Staff was aware that both sites had development interest and saw an opportunity to organize a swap that will gain the city a slight net increase in R-12 zoning. This is important according to the city's Housing Goal, "to provide a variety of housing types to meet the diverse housing needs of current and future city residents." Preservation of R-12 zone lands is warranted because it allows a full range of housing types, with a minimum lot size of 33,350,provides flexibility for both attached and detached ownership and multi-family,rental-type housing which supports affordable housing options in the city. Attached single-family residential or detached single family housing on small lots are an important component of the city's strategy to provide for a range of housing types and a range of affordability. Associate Planner Pagenstecher said Site A is at Spruce and 72"d Avenue and fronts on a local residential street. It is bordered by R-4.5 and low-density housing, unincorporated Washington County to the north and CG and R 4.5 to the south. The adjacent lower class streets and lower density residential use make the property more suitable for medium residential use. It would form a transition between lower density and commercial zoned properties. Site A is located behind Fred Meyer. Site B fronts on Pacific Highway, classified as a primary arterial and is flanked by property zoned CG. Residential property adjacent to Pacific Highway is rare as it is primarily associated with private and public school ownership and use which is allowed conditionally in residential zones. Topographically constrained land between Canterbury Lane and Bull Mountain Road also has R-12 zoned land along Pacific Highway. This swap would result in a .17-acre net increase in R-12 zoned land. The Planning Commission voted 6-1 in favor, supporting the city's initiative to preserve R-12 capacity and to further owner and property developer interests in both Site A and B. The Metzger neighborhood is here also as they were present at the Planning Commission to alert council to their concerns: increased water runoff,increased traffic,inadequate parking, and loss of open space associated with future development. Mr. Pagenstecher concluded by saying these proposed amendments comply with applicable state planning goals, applicable regional planning regulations,Tigard Comprehensive Plan, and applicable provisions of the city's implementing ordinances. C. Council questions of staff: Councilor Woodard asked if there was a reason to choose a legislative hearing process rather than quasi-judicial.Associate Planner Pagenstecher said yes,given other deliberations in the city going on about the value of R-12 zoned land at the time the quasi-judicial proposal would be coming to the Planning Commission or Council; staff would most likely have not TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —January 12, 2016 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 11 of 19 supported it. This was because it would have created a loss of R-12 zoning. But if done legislatively with inclusion of this other property it could be supported because it would not create a net loss of R-12 zoning. There was also interest in getting the school property developed soon. Councilor Goodhouse asked why the city did not do a zoning swap with the Heritage Crossing property. Council President Snider said they did not offer a swap and the sum of the density would have been lower. Associate Planner Pagenstecher said swap opportunities are rare. d. Public Testimony Richard and Katie Topping 19765 Derby Street,West Linn, OR 97068 Katie Topping gave their history with the property. They bought it in 2008 and their goal was to develop a preschool. They wanted to make an amazing preschool but she needed to first get her Master's degree. They both continued to be teachers and wanted to sell the property but the recession hit. Finally,last year they received an offer from someone who wanted to build storage units. They decided that was not quite the right fit. Later, someone wanted to build a trampoline warehouse. They spoke to Stafford Development and felt that the housing situation was a good compromise. They wanted to do a zone change that was beneficial and also get some return on their savings. Richard Topping said he understood that there may be some resistance from people in the neighborhood. The current tenants strive to keep kids off the property but there are a lot of dogs and drug use going on the property and it is a constant battle to keep it maintained. He said developing it into nice houses would be a benefit to the community. Levi Levasa, Stafford Development Company, 485 South State Street,Lake Oswego, OR 97034,said they approached the Toppings last year after noticing the property was prime residential area yet is was zoned commercial. It is surrounded by residential and there is currently residential use on the property. They expressed support for the zone swap and hoped council find the Planning Commission's decision and staff report to be accurate. Monet Ragsdale, 1521 Oxbow Drive,Montrose, CO, spoke in support of the zone change, especially on the property owned by the school district. That property is surrounded by commercial property and commercial uses and the zone change would allow private development to come in,creating jobs and adding to the tax base. Will Ramusen,Miller Nash Graham Dunn, 111 SW Fifth Avenue,Portland, OR 97204, spoke on behalf of the Tigard-Tualatin School District, the owner of Site B. This application is a win-win-win. It will help the property owner. It helps the city's housing supply situation and it helps the school district fix a problem that they have had for a long,long time. The district has held this property since the 1940s at least. In 2005 it was officially designated as surplus property. It is zoned residential but on Pacific Highway so they have received little interest from buyers since listing it in 2006. Only a few inquiries were received, all interested in commercial. They have spoken with the city a few times about changing the zoning but the cost of a quasi-judicial rezone that reduces the inventory TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —January 12, 2016 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 12 of 19 of housing,in light of regional and state policies,led the district to say no. He said this is an appropriate and creative approach and appreciates staff's leadership and the city for thinking outside the box to solve multiple problems. He noted some comments have come from people liking the sites and wanting them to remain open space. He said he hoped the city does not develop a policy that maintains open space through miss-zoned properties. Noreen Gibbons, 10730 SW 72"d Avenue,Tigard, OR 97223, said she lives directly across from Site A. She referred to the previous speaker and said this would actually be win-win- lose for her neighborhood. She said when she purchased her property there were three houses across the street. When the Toppings bought the site and wanted to put in a preschool she was supportive of that use. That would have been fine with her and the quality of the neighborhood. But having 18-20 two-story houses built on the site will have negative effects on the character of the neighborhood. She said she had spoken to council before about traffic issues and there have been motorcycle officers in her driveway recently ticketing people for running the stop sign. She asked what the traffic'Arill be like when there are six driveways across the street. She asked why the zoning had to be R-12 and suggested it be lower density. Gay Wakeland signed up to speak but left the meeting earlier. Ivan Vanek, 7290 SW Pine Street,Tigard, OR 97223 said he bought his home in 1995 with the understanding that the adjacent property would be developed with low density. He said that putting in two-story houses will be an eyesore and he does not agree with the plan. Jim Long, 10730 SW 72"d Avenue,Tigard, OR, 97223, distributed copies of his testimony and this has been added to the record. He said he is the chair of CP04M, serving east Tigard,Metzger and Durham and will be speaking as chair and as a private citizen. He said the CP04M unanimously voted to endorse retaining the Commercial General zoning for Site A. After reading the pre-application materials he found huge errors. If the city goes forward or approves this application he will appeal and the city will lose. He referred to Councilor Woodard's question about holding a legislative hearing and commented that holding this as a legislative public hearing process and not a quasi-judicial one minimizes public input and is highly irregular. According to Tigard Community Development Code 18.390.050, zoning map and text amendments should be quasi-judicial proceedings. He said the city is trying to change the statutes for review for the citizens to the detriment of citizen involvement and Goal 1 land use law. He said, "To put it another way, maybe you are not neutral." Mr. Long said citizens have not been involved in every phase of the planning process. All public notices and signs had the wrong date and time for this hearing. The public notices were not sent to all of the neighbors. The public notice of November 9 states that all documents are available for inspection and copies are available at least seven days prior to the hearing. On November 30 he came to review the documents and talked with Planners Floyd and Pagenstecher who told him there were no documents to review. (Code CDC 18.390.050.C.2.a.) On December7 he tried the published number of 503-718-2432 and left two messages. No one responded. He had to drive to the city with his questions. The city TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —January 12, 2016 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 13 of 19 put up flimsy signs at both sites that were unreadable by the first week of December. He showed photographs of the signs. Planning Commission Vice President Fitzgerald commented that maybe some sturdier signs could be put up which was not done. The public notice was not published on the city's website from December 3-December 6. Some neighbors just heard about this zone change and did not have time to prepare comments. At Site B there is a for sale sign listing"commercial" but the property is not commercial. CDC 193.90 there has been no readable effective public notice at either Site A or Site B since one week before the Planning Commission meeting last month. In the four weeks since and even though the Planning Commission was notified with photos and a commissioner suggested public notice signs be changed. This is a violation of due process and now,January 12, 2016 there has been no public notice for over four weeks. This is a violation of due process 197.763 so this hearing has no effect. Because the other sign is four times larger and says commercial, the average citizen would probably think it was already zoned commercial. Mr. Long said the commercial sign at Site B is in violation of city code chapter 18.780.130.B, besides it is not zoned commercial. He said the file title "Residential Preservation"is a misnomer and is misleading to citizens. Preservation hides the nature of the application which is to change zoning.The file title should be understandable to citizens and residents. He asked why the city is doing this zone swap as the city does not have enough commercial property according to an Cogan Owens Cogan report. Do not take Site A out of commercial zoning. There is also a deficiency of R-12 residential zoning shown in the Angelo report. He said it was very important to note that there is no loss because school property was not included in that inventory of properties zoned residential. Yes, making Site B would place that property back on the tax rolls. He said he asked to see the 2006 staff report on annexation of the three properties (Site A) into the city but it was missing pages 3-11. The language in the 2006 annexation ordinance justified the importance of Site A to be commercial. A comprehensive plan amendment is not a periodic review but periodic review has occurred and the zoning has remained the same. He listed reasons why Site B should remain residential due to its location adjacent to Charles F. Tigard Elementary. Students could walk safely to school and residents and visitors could easily hop on public transit along Pacific Highway. The city staff report incorrectly states the description of Site A saying the current zone does not allow residential use. There are currently two houses and there were three prior that have been lived in for decades. He said the citizens do not support residential use there,particularly R-12, three- story buildings. Since there is a deficit of commercial property the city should not take Site A out of commercial zoning. He suggested rezoning the excess R-7 property the city has, per the Angelo housing study. He asked why the city does not simply convert Site B from residential to commercial. He said it appears that the city concocted this zone swap forgetting earlier findings and evidence. The city had reasons for keeping in commercial professional during annexation and periodic reviews. He asked that the city deny the request for a comprehensive plan amendment and zone change. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —January 12, 2016 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 14 of 19 (Heidi Rechteger and others gave their testimony time to Jim Long.) Leslie Gray, 10650 SW 75`h Avenue,Tigard, OR 97223, said they bought their home in 1999 and moved from Portland in search of space. Living on one acre in Metzger they love the livability of the area. She said having 19 houses spring up behind your house is a shock. She said she is not against affordable housing but it impacts livability in the neighborhood and the schools. She noted the impact higher density developments have had on Metzger Elementary. At almost 600 students they are at capacity at the moment. These 19 homes as well as the proposed homes on Spruce and on Ash Street in the wetlands will become a problem for families that want their children to go to local schools. If a teacher is over capacity, children may have to be bussed to another school. This will affect our families and the education of our students. Nathan Murdock. 7415 SW Spruce Street,Tigard, OR, said he lived in three different locations on the street for over 23 years. One reason he likes the street is that the houses have big lots. His property of one quarter- acre,gives an opportunity for kids to grow and be off of the streets. He has been involved in putting speed humps and stop signs put in. The new homes at the end of 74`h Avenue park on Spruce because there is not enough parking. It is the same problem at Tigard Woods. To build row houses or any other tight-fitting homes will only create more problems. He commented that ODOT said they have no problem and the development should not cause any problems but he has seen many traffic problems as the area becomes denser. When 99W backs up cars use Spruce,Pine and Oak Streets in their neighborhood. It would be nice to have a business on the property that is daytime only with cars that clear out at the end of the day or a guarantee that only 6-7 homes with quarter-acre lots would be built. Nancy Tracy, 7310 SW Pine Street,Tigard, OR 97223, said she supports the CPO's unanimous vote to maintain Site A as commercial,professional one-story zoning. She said she is very disturbed at what the city is doing. Changing a zone is not a frivolous thing. We are talking as if the zone has already been changed. She felt the city's action to effect a quick rezoning on Spruce Street and R-12 rezoning is just a little short of a hostile takeover. This 1.35 acre area annexed to Tigard in 2006 sits within the Metzger community but Metzger has been kept in the dark. There is so much traffic on Spruce Street that parents fear for their children's safety when boarding the school bus because there is so much commuter traffic. This land will never exist again to provide a park. South of Spruce Street Tigard has a lot of land that will be redeveloped for more intense housing. That will leave people without a space to call their own. A park would allow a lot of release. Children and adults need space to run,climb or jog. Once this area is buried under tons of concrete or asphalt,it will be gone forever. It is a miracle that it has survived to this point. It has more potential that just for putting a development on it. She said she hope more consideration will be give this because there is no lack of developable land. e. Council Questions and Discussion TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —January 12, 2016 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.6gard-or.gov I Page 15 of 19 Mayor Cook asked about the public notices that had the wrong date and time for this hearing. The hearing notice for this meeting listed the date as Tuesday,January 12,2015. He apologized for putting in the wrong year. Otherwise the notice was correct. Council President Snider asked about the other process issues. Associate Planner Pagenstecher responded that he cannot vouch for some of that but he knew that Mr. Long submitted a records request that was filled and all items asked for were delivered. He referred to testimony that holding a legislative public hearing rather than a quasi-judicial hearing abridged their rights in some way but the process is the same. They both get hearings at Planning Commission and Council. Mayor Cook asked about the records request missing pages and asked if all items were delivered. Associate Planner Pagenstecher said if it was missing he certainly could have asked. He had not heard previously from Mr. Long about that yet he made particular effort to reach Mr. Long and be available for any questions but he did not take advantage of that. Council President Snider asked about the 2432 telephone number. Mr. Pagenstecher read his copy of the public notice and said the telephone number is 2434 which is his number. The sturdiness of the public notice signs was questioned by Councilor Woodard. Associate Planner Pagenstecher said in this case the signs were a casualty of the weather. He said the material used and methods of posting have been in use at the city for ten years. He said to his knowledge this is the first time it has been cited as a problem. Councilor Goodhouse mentioned that the sign the city put up at the proposed Heritage Crossing site was also down and asked staff to look into that. Mayor Cook proposed that due to the time,items remaining on the agenda,and possible missed postings or records request pages, the public hearing be left open to a date certain,with the continuation re-noticed and weather-resistant signs at the site reposted with this information. He asked council to ask staff any questions that they want answered at the continued public hearing. Council President Snider suggested Assistant Community Development Director McGuire validate and address the process issues raised tonight. He said residents say they will appeal the legislative decision and he had questions for the city attorney on that. He asked staff if this property (Site A) has ever been considered for park property in any park master plan or rating process for park acquisition. Councilor Woodard asked if the new homes on 74`h Avenue are R-12 or a lower density. He asked for a plotting or other visual information on what the different residential zoning areas mean and if lower density had been considered. He expressed concern that he hears there is not enough parking in the neighborhood. He said he supported the zoning change on Site B but has questions on the use of the quasi-judicial process for two properties. Councilor Henderson advised that the commercial property sign be taken down at Site A until it is zoned correctly. Mayor Cook agreed but said the city does not have an officer that drives around and checks signage unless there is a complaint. Council President Snider asked if real estate signs are controlled by the code and Associate Planner Pagenstecher replied that they do not have to go through the sign permit process. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —January 12, 2016 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 16 of 19 Councilor Woodard verified that Metzger Elementary is the school in that neighborhood and that any development would impact the school. Mayor Cook said that is not the city's issue;it would be up to the school district to handle. City Manager Wine noted that council is looking at a potential business meeting combined with the CCDA meeting of February 2 and the next available meeting would be March 8. Mayor Cook asked staff what the noticing requirement is and Mr. Pagenstecher said a public hearing is continued to a date certain and no additional notice is required. Councilor Goodhouse said he and Councilor Woodard would be absent on March 8. Councilor Goodhouse mentioned he liked to keep the zoning the same as the surrounding neighborhood. Council President Snider pointed out that R-25,R-4.5, CG and CP surround Site A and asked which one he considered the neighborhood zone. Councilor Woodard moved to continue the public hearing to a date certain of February 2 and Council President Snider seconded the motion. Mayor Cook reiterated that the record would be kept open. He conducted a vote and the motion passed unanimously. Yes No Mayor Cook ✓ Councilor Goodhouse ✓ Councilor Henderson ✓ Council President Snider ✓ Councilor Woodard ✓ 8. CONSIDER AMENDMENT TO CITY MANAGER EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT Human Resources Director Bennett gave the staff report for this item. She said following their annual evaluation of the city manager, council recommended an employment contract amendment. Councilor Henderson moved for approval of Contract Amendment No. 6 to the city manager's employment contract. Councilor Goodhouse seconded the motion and Mayor Cook conducted a vote. The motion passed unanimously. Yes No Mayor Cook ✓ Councilor Goodhouse ✓ Councilor Henderson ✓ Council President Snider ✓ Councilor Woodard ✓ TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —January 12, 2016 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 17 of 19 9. LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD: CONSIDERATION OF A CONTRACT AWARD TO MURRAY, SMITH AND ASSOCIATES FOR HUNZIKER PROJECT Public Contracts Manager Barrett, City Engineer Faha,Economic Development Manager Purdy and Engineer Newbury were present for any questions on this item. Public Contracts Manager Barrett said this was discussed at the December 15 council workshop meeting and there is not much new information that was not covered then. More refined numbers were received for Phases 2 and 3 but those phases would receive further refinement and would come back for council consideration. This contract is for engineering services for Phase 1 of the Hunziker infrastructure project. Since the city was going to contract separately with Murray, Smith and Associates for the Red Rock Creek water line project staff proposes rolling that into this contract in order to alleviate administrative costs. LCRB Member Snider moved for approval of the contract with Murray, Smith and Associates for the Hunziker project and LCRB Member Goodhouse seconded the motion. Chair Cook conducted a vote and announced that the motion passed unanimously. Yes No LCRB Chair Cook ✓ LCRB Member Goodhouse ✓ LCRB Member Henderson ✓ LCRB Member Snider ✓ LCRB Member Woodard ✓ 10. DISCUSS PROPOSED FY 2017 CITY COUNCIL BUDGET Due to the time council agreed to discuss this at the next business meeting. Assistant City Manager Newton handed out to council a copy of their budget with recent changes circled including adding money for a reception and including$10,000 for TYAC support.A copy has been added to the packet for this meeting. 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION. None scheduled. 12. NON-AGENDA ITEM—City Manager Wine said there will be a council outreach event at the Summerfield Clubhouse on January 28,2016. She reminded council to wear their name badges. She noted that following the Community Attitude Survey staff also contracted with the vendor to put two focus groups together. Topics are what the barriers are for walking in Tigard and citizen willingness to pay for services and how they want to pay for them. Council may observe the focus groups Tuesday,January 19 at 5:30 and 7:30 p.m. in the Public Works Building. Council's Thursday packet will have all the details. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —January 12, 2016 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 18 of 19 h M 13. ADJOURNMENT At 10:31 p.m. Council President Snider moved for adjournment. Councilor Goodhouse seconded the motion. Mayor Cook conducted a vote and the motion passed unanimously. Yes No Mayor Cook ✓ Councilor Goodhouse ✓ Councilor Henderson ✓ Council President Snider ✓ Councilor Woodard ✓ Carol A. Krager, City Recorder Attest: John L. Cook, Mayor Date TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —January 12, 2016 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.dgard-or.gov I Page 19 of 19 r PLEASE SIGN IN HERE Tigard Planning Commission Agenda Item #_L) Page of 2.. Date of Hearing4- Case Number(s) \C(-YN 2,0 1 �MMS" '2—C) N; LO (S-- OODOD Case Name r\-S'-�y Q-e-'% 2_'A t CA 1'\ Location If you would like to speak on this item, please CLEARLY PRINTI your name, address, and zip code below: Proponent (FOR the propos 1): Opponent (AGAINST th, proposal): Name: e N -�-� t— Name: pe"N\ e n Address:-7'35 r N ddress: 7 3 S r I N4P— City, State, Zi . gra �� City, State, Zip: r 2+J"O , o Q 9-722-3 °�e Name: 111A1 1/_KMOIS�) Name:0 bre-P,1') V l 660 n,5 Address: l W S's` Addr ss: 10-7-3D 5W 7P � City, State, Zip: 1 \n� q-1 2� City, State, Zip: � a � OK 1 7aaj Name: Z;,L� Name: F}f h w Dk y r N Address: -12-o Svc t.J,st ., {� A��t `;k- `7�p ress: 5 City, State ZIP: � QR 9�Z-0 City, State, Zip: Name: Address: Address: �d DV 704,4 ve City, State, Zip: City, State, Zip: 7'(6X R �d z3 t Name: Name: Address: Address: 3 5n o i City, State, Zip: City, State, Zip: q7 9-2-3 i/` PLEASE SIGN IN HERE Tigard Manning Commission Agenda Item # Page -Z-_ of Date of Hearing -1 `¢- t s Case Number(s) C Pr-� '7 F~g 4�,; �r (�'- 00DO-1 Case Name Location �13®� °:� ®ryc(' � �� `)0` 5Lti Z -i 1 C) -A If you would like to speak on this item, please CLEARLY PRINT your name, address, and zip code below: Proponent (FOR the proposal): Opponent (AGAINST the proposal): Name: TAddressAts me: Am, - va fan a t'G ra t l L Address: r'W `jP-/Y-a U City, State, Zip: City, State, Zip: 'rj qU rC;A Name: Name: Address: Address:)p-730 ,�W City, State, Zip: City, State, Zip: Porti", QF. 437v?a3 Name: Name: Address: Address: City, State, Zip: City, State, Zip: Name: Name: Address: Address: City, State, Zip: City, State, Zip: Name: Nam-..- Address: ame:Address: Address: City, State, Zip: City, State, Zip: PC Hearing 12-14-2015 R-12 Comp Plan and Zone Change CPA15-05/ZON15-07 Introduction For the record, rep city as applicant. Materials Attachments: A: Site A B: Site B C: Kittelson TPR Analysis D: ODOT Comment Letter 12-1-2015 E. Murdock Comment Letter 12-7-2015 Background LownwTive The city is initiating this„Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment to facilitate preservation of R-12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use. Staff proposes the change in response to two development applications, both of which involve R-12 zoning. Pursuant to the City's housing goal to provide opportunities for a variety of housing types to meet the diverse housing needs of current and future City residents, the affordable housing types allowed in the R-12 zone warrant the need to preserve R-12 zoned lands. The timing of the applications identified above is such that the city staff would have likely recommended denial of the proposed R- 12 to C-G zone change to avoid loss of R-12 zoned land. However, the city's proposal combines the KX' two zone change proposals so that a finding of no net loss of R-12 can be made through the a�4 sj legislative process. TyP Site Description � RUz�I The locational characteristics of the subject parcel otherwise support the comp plan amendments and zone changes. The property zoned C-P (Sitet) fronts on a local and a neighborhood street and is adjacent to property zoned R-4.5 and low-density unincorporated Washington County. The adjacent lower class streets and low density residential use zone makes the property more suitable for medium residential use that forms a transition from the C-G zone to the south and the R-4.5 zone to the north. /n.P.Z6&P, V&1rV-.Wha , t&I-0 �1 � �r.'r, t yr An4m ys Residential-zoned land adjacc t to Pacific Hwy is rare in Tigard and i primarily associated with private and public school nership and use,which is allowed conditio ally in residential zones. The Tigard-Tualatin School District has identified the subject property (Site B) as surplus and intends to sell it for the highest best use. The proposed C-G zone is the dominant zone along Pacific Hwy (classified as Primary Arterial) and the existing zone of the adjacent parcels. Comments- ODO": in support of Kittelson TPR Analysis and proposed mitigation measures for future development to reduce turning conflicts from School Street and e�site.5. .s IV#4hAN Murdock : Neighbor at NE corner of Spruce and 75`h Aveencerned with increased water runoff, increased traffic, and inadequate parking associated with future development. Response in Section VII of the staff report. pg /y opo? ;,till Rrµclsis' e,,�pAalyw P_12- - L-� Conclusion: The proposed changes comply with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals, applicable regional, state and federal regulations, the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, and applicable provisions of the City's implementing ordinances. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the proposed amendme is to the Ti aid City Council as determined through the public hearing process. 44 A7 Z F 0-)qjjVd TAte- � +/ `-j S �I, lei � Avi Az, (4 G! a k S As �,�,q�WK 13f244, ,�7eb A10 C R DRAFT #1.1 TESTIMONY to Planning Commission My name is Jim Long. I am the elected chair of CPO-4M, the Citizens Participation Organization serving East Tigard — Metzger— and Durham. On Monday Dec. Th 2015, the membership CPO-4M voted unanimously to endorse retaining the Commercial-Professional zoning for Site A: the property at the corner of 72nd Avenue and SW Spruce Streets First of all, the City's File Title is a misnomer and is misleading to citizens. It is not "Residential Preservation." And it is not commercial-professional preservation. It's a swap. We are hoping that this zone swap is not a done deal. The word `Preservation' does not explain the nature of the application ORGANIZED according the Application Review Criteria facts and opinions APPLICABLE REVIEW_CRITERIA:_ Community Development Code Chapters 18.380/020 Community Development Code Chapters 19.390.000.G; Comprehensive Plan Goal 1 Comprehensive Plan Goal 2 Comprehensive Plan Goal 10 Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Title 1. City Comprehensive Plan Goal 1 Citizen Involvement(PROCESS 1. Goal 1 says citizens should be involved in every part of the process. 2. . [I tried the published telephone number on Dec. 7`h and it didn't work = no response. IT DIDN'T WORK,} 2. In the Public hearing Notice it states that documents and applications can be reviewed at City Hall for free. When I went to review documents as cited,John Floyd and Gary Pagenstecher said there were no documents. But they had talked about many apps. (18.390.050 C2A) 3. _____Public Notice_(see pics): _notification:_residents_( tenants/voters)_ vs. property owners_, $o, theCity put_u_p some flimsy_-"Public-No-tices" at_both_sites_buttheydidn't_last very_long On Dec. 2?This._pic_b_elow was taken of the Site A"Public Notice_"which was blown_down,_unreadab_le and-ineffe_ctive. This is a violation of due process 197.763. So, this hearing has no real effect. 1 City Comprehensive Plan Goal 2 Land Use Planning Cid Comvrehensive_Plan Goal_10_HOUSING State of Oregon Comprehensive Planning Goal 1 Citizen Involv_ement State of Oregon Comprehensive Planning Goal 2_Land_Use Planning State of Oregon ComprehensivePlanni_g Goal 10 HOUSING TESTIMONY STATEMENTS FACTS & BACKGROUND HISTORY Citizens are supposed to be involved in every phase of planning. The City' s Public Notice (mid November) say documents can be reviewed. Citizens of Metzger were involved at the county level in the 1970s and 1980s. The comprehensive plan has been in the works for over forty years and The Zoning Map for Site A has been the same Commercial-Professional zoning for forty years. Citizens went to a meeting in 2006 when the property owners and Westlake consultants wanted to build for educational purposes and needed this particular commercial property annexed into the City of Tigard. Some people were opposed to annexation into the city. The City annexed for the owner's purpose of a pre-school that we are still waiting to be built. 2006: So, these three properties were annexed into the City of Tigard for a preschool. Contrary to the staff report this property is not totally level. There is a drop-off of approximately 40 feet from east to west. Flooding occurs that prevents mowing this property and there are springs. According to the staff report: "The timing of the applications identified above is such that the city staff would have likely recommended denial of the proposed R-12 to C-G zone change to avoid loss of R-12 zoned land. " The Staff report does not say that sites if changed from current zoning there will be increased traffic rates at both sites This proposed CP Amendment is not a periodic review, but a periodic review has occurred in recent years and the zoning remained the same. 3 Site B abuts the Charles F. Tigard Elementary School and is a perfect location for residential houses, allowing students to walk to school and everybody to hop on one of the many buses along Pacific Highway 99. City staff report incorrectly states in the Site description of Site A: "the current zone does not allow residential use" What? This is wrong. There are two houses on Site A now that have been lived in as residences for decades. And across SW72nd Avenue there are residences that are zoned "Commercial". 2015: City being proactive: These applications have been withdrawn, in favor of the city's legislative action to rezone the subject parcel, as proposed. [NO, who decided this? Why wasn't it considered?] The affordable housing types allowed in the R-12 zone warrant the need to preserve R-12 zoned lands. The timing of the applications identified above is such that the city staff would have likely recommended denial of the proposed R- 12 to C-G zone change to avoid loss of R-12 zoned land. [WE didn't know about these, so where is the transparency] [GOOD] 1-lowever, the city's proposal co The city is initiating this Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment to facilitate preservation of R- 12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use. [We the citizens do not support residential use! R-12] We want to see the commercial inventory of the city. We want to see the residential inventory of the city, the population projections, and the jobs projections. We want to see the language in the 2006 annexation ordinance that justified the importance of Site A to be commercial-professional. Because there are many outstanding questions we ask for a continu 4 5 ance for an opportunity to provide more evidence. A continuance can be always done voluntarily because the record is incomplete. Would you do an extension? Procedural violations effect our substantial rights. Ideally it could be mixed use [Has there been coordination with Washington County?] re traffic?? Why is the city trying this zone swap as a legislative process instead of a quasi-judicial process. It seems to be highly irregular. 18.390 It does not allow much citizen involvement (like the fox watching the hen house). The city is trying to change the statutes of review for the citizens. Since there is a deficit of commercial properties, why take site A out of commercial? Why doesn't the city convert Site B as residential? The city has not projected the population need for R-12. Why not re3one the excess R-7 property. You should not be taking Site A out of commercial. Rezone R-7, there's twice as much as the city needs. [Angelo report The school district can make money The city can allow the school district to change to commercial. It appears the city has concocted this zone swap forgetting their findings and evidence. We want to get the 22006 reasoning on the record. A similar case to this is the "Strawberry Hill 4 Wheelers case vs. Benton County. [Citizens have not been involved in every step in the process.] 5 Public Records Request Form 12/14/15, 1:22 PM ]OBS MAPS I CONP City of Tl* gard, Oregon HomE CITY OF TIGARD Public Records Request Form Email Me Return to Q • For assistance with Police Records, please contact the Tigard Police Records staff at 503-639-6168. • For assistance with Municipal Court Records please contact the Court Clerk at 503-718-2484. Public Records Request Form Oregon Public Records Law grants each person the right to inspect the records of a public body (unless exempt frol will contact you within 5 business days of receiving this request. Required fields are marked by an asterisk (*) Contact Name: * Phone #: Have you already contacted someone within the City about this request? If so, please give their (if known). http://www.tigard-or.gov/recordsRequest/index.php Page 1 of 3 Public Records Request Form 12/14/15, 1:22 PM Fax #: Alternate Phone #: Email Address: Description of Records Requested (please be as specific as possible): Type the text Privacy&Terms z PLEASE NOTE: After you press the Submit Request button, you should see a confirmation page. If you do City Records at 503-718-2483 to confirm your request submission. Tube ------ FEEDBACKI http://www.tigard-or.gov/recordsRequest/index.php Page 2 of 3 a ■ On Dec. 2015,_this_vic was taken of_the public _notice at Site-B,_In_the background,_behind_the fence we see that perhaps__it's_a done deal 4 Sh I_ a 2 Spruce St. Sign - portlandbrewbus@gmail.com - Gmail Page 1 of 2 Open PO?t43nu Gmail COMPOSE n' 11 to 1 Inbox(18) !! Starred Important i- Chats Sent Mail Sh Drafts(46) All Mail Spam(25) Trash 1 OHSU+INVOIC.. Portland Nc Han: ..o Contac: Find someone 2.86 GB(19%)of 15 GS used Terms-Pnvacv Manaae last account activity',2 minutes ago https Wmail.google.com/mail/u/0/ 12/13/2015 Gary Pagenstecher From: Nathan Murdock <murdock7700@comcast.net> Sent: Monday, December 07, 2015 11:38 AM To: Gary Pagenstecher Subject: CPA 2015-00005, ZON 2015-00007 Med.Res. (R-12) Pres. Dec. 7th, 2015 Dear Gary Pagenstecher, We are writing in regards to the Public Hearing Notice we received for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change.After reading the notice we do have concerns(as Nathan has already talked to you) about the re designation of the land sited in Site A: 7303 SW Spruce Street, 10705 SW 72nd Ave, and 10735 SW 72nd Ave.This 3 parcel of land is 1.54 acres and the owner is wanting to rezone this 3 parcels as Medium Density Residential R-12 Preservation. It is our understanding this to mean that the owner can place 12 units per acre or 18 unites on the 1.54 acres of land. With an average family of 4 this can bring 48 to 72 additional residents. Whether the owner places 12 or 18 unites on this 1.54 acres of land the concerns we have are increase water runoff, increase traffic and inadequate parking in which is already a problem. If 12 or 18 units are placed on this 1.54 acres, we could also lose part of our front yard and part of our side yard, due to potential road improvements.We are in the process of revamping our front yard for a water fountain and/or flag pole. If sidewalks go in and we lose part of our yard, how do we prepare our front yard projects and water runoff problems?We have lived on this street for over 23 years,Ann has lived in the neighborhood her entire life (46 years) and water run off seems to cause more problems for the neighborhood every time some new construction happens. This neighborhood, Spruce and 72nd, is a quiet residential neighborhood. In the past few years this area has under gone many changes with Walmart, new houses on 781h and Spruce,Tigard Woods Condos, wetlands, and new detached condos on 74th.These changes have brought an increase in water runoff problems, increase of traffic and parking problems. We've had people parking in front of our house and across the street that are going to the new homes at the end of 74th and from Tigard Woods Condos on 76th Place. We've talked to those residents and they have told us that there isn't enough parking in those two locations. Now with more similar buildings going up, where are they to park?On the street or Fred Meyers parking lot? It also concerns us that delivery trucks trying to get into Fred Meyers will have problems due to more cars parking on the street so they can't make their turns.And of course, we have tried to get the City of Tigard to recognize these problems with no prevail, so people with mental issues, children, handicapped, seniors, children riding bikes and families have to walk in the streets that are not well lite and no sidewalks for the most part. And you want to approve more traffic of all kinds to go 72"d, Spruce St and on to 78th. Why? Increase in traffic on these streets has been a major problem. When the speed humps went in this detoured many cars from using this area as a short cut and also helped reduce the speed that cars were traveling at. But when the new developments were built, people moving in with the additional cars this has caused an increase in traffic and speed.The new speed humps are code but they do not slow the traffic down as much as the old ones did.The new developments that have gone in recently have not provided ample parking for those residents and as a consequence those residents are parking on Spruce and having to walk a block or two in distance to their homes.Adding in a potential of 12 to 18 units with 48 to 72 additional residents with on average 2 cars per residence plus teenage drivers within the family, that's an additional 24 to 36+ cars on the 1.54 acres. Are these residents going to park on the streets or in Fred Meyer's parking lot and walk home? As we have stated Ann has lived in the Metzger area for 46 years, crime has continued to rise as fast as people move in to this once small quiet neighborhood. 1 This small neighborhood is full of retired residents, middle class families and young families. We want this area to remain as such.Yes this area has issues but why complicate it and add to the issues, this only creates a larger problem. If we wanted to live in the likes of Portland we would have bought in Portland. To match the rest of the properties in the area perhaps divide the 1.54 acres into 3-6 parcels and build 3-6 single family homes. Or my idea would be to build a quiet hospice center that was in a home like setting still keeping it commercial. According to Homefacts.com our zip code of 97223 for 2010 has a 76.78% higher crime rate than the national average, 2012 has an 87.89% higher crime rate than national average, in 2014 has a 98.73% higher than the national average for crime.Which can be broken down into vehicle theft, larceny theft, property crime, and robbery.Violent crimes such as aggressive assaults are 24% higher than the national average. Even with a margin for error these statics show that crime in our area has increased with the only thing changing is the increase of resident housing like, in apartments, condos and townhouses. Why change the zoning until you know the total plan of what is to be built? Respectfully, Nathan and Ann Murdock 7415 SW Spruce Street Tigard Oregon 97223 503-810-0163 This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com 2 City of Tigard Planning Commission Agenda (Revised 12/8/ 15) MEETING DATE: December 14, 2015 - 7:00 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard—Town Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL 7:00 p.m. 3. COMMUNICATIONS 7:02 p.m. 4. CONSIDER MINUTES 7:04 p.m. 5. PUBLIC HEARING 7:05 p.m. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R-12) PRESERVATION Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) 2015-00005;Zone Change (ZON) 2015-00007 REQUEST: The city is initiating this Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment to facilitate preservation of R-12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use. The City proposes changing the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning District Classifications of the subject parcels in SITE A(3 parcels totaling 1.54 acres) from Professional Commercial (C-P) to Medium Density Residential (R-12);and changing the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning Map Classifications of the subject parcel in SITE B (1 parcel of 1.37 acres) from Medium Density Residential (R-12) to General Commercial (C-G). APPLICANT: City of Tigard LOCATION: SITE A: 7303 SW Spruce St., 10705 SW 72nd Ave., 10735 SW 72nd Ave;TAX MAP/ LOT#'s: 1S136ACO2200, 1S136ACO2400, 1S136ACO2500; and SITE B: 13125 SW Pacific H,�vry TAX MAP/ LOT# 2S102CB00200 ZONES:FROM: Medium Density Residential (R-12) and Professional Commercial (C-P) TO: General Commercial (C-G) and Medium Density Residential (R-12) APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380.020 and 18.390.060.G; Comprehensive Plan Goals 1, 2, 10; Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 10; and Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Title 1. 6. PUBLIC HEARING (CONTINUED FROM DECEMBER 7th) 8:05 p.m. HERITAGE CROSSING ZONE CHANGE AND SUBDIVISION (ALTERNATIVE PROPOSAL: ZON2015-00006/SUB2015-00015/ADj2015-00003 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a concurrent Zoning Map Amendment, Subdivision, and Special Adjustment to street standards to develop approximately 9.10 acres located at 15435 SW Hall Boulevard. The quasi-judicial zoning map amendment would change 6.05 acres of the project site from R-12 to R-7, with no change in zoning to the remaining 3.05 acres. Associated with the application is a concurrent request for subdivision of the site into 62 single-family lots, and a special adjustment to street standards to allow new local streets to match existing streets that adjoin the property. The applicant submitted a similar proposal earlier this year, which was indefinitely suspended by the City Council on October 20, 2015 (see file ZON2015-00002, SUB2015-00001, VAR2015-00001). APPLICANT:Venture Properties LOCATION: 15435 SW Hall Blvd ZONES: R-12 to R-7 APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.370.020.C.9, 18.380.030.C, and 18.430.040.A; and Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Title 16. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA— December 14, 2015 Cityof Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 1 503-639-4171 1 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 oft Agenda Item: 5 Hearing Date: December 14,2015 Time: 7:00 PM STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD 120 DAYS = N/A SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NO.: Comprehensive Plan Amendment(CPA) 2015-00005 Zone Change (ZON) 2015-00007 FILE TITLE: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R-12) PRESERVATION APPLICANT: City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: The city is initiating this Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment to facilitate presen ation of R-12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use. The City proposes changing the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning District Classifications of the subject parcels in SITE A (3 parcels totaling 1.54 acres) from Professional Commercial (C-P) to Medium Density Residential (R-12); and changing the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning Map Classifications of the subject parcel in SITE B (1 parcel of 1.37 acres) from Medium Density=Residential (R-12) to General Commercial (C-G). LOCATION: SITE A: 7303 SW Spruce St., 10705 SW 72nd Ave., 10735 SW 72nd Ave;TAX MAP/ LOT#'s: 1S136ACO2200, 1S136ACO2400, 1S136ACO2500;and SITE B: 13125 SW Pacific Hwy TAX MAP/ LOT# 2S102CB00200 COMP PLAN DESIGNATION/ ZONING DISTRICT: FROM: Medium Density Residential (R-12) and Professional Commercial (C-P) TO: General Commercial (C-G) and Medium Density Residential (R-12) APPLICABLE Community Development Code Chapters 18.380.020 and 18.390.060.G; REVIEW Comprehensive Plan Goals 1, 2, 10; Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 10; and CRITERIA: Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Title 1. STAFF COMMISSION CP:A 2015-00005//,ON2015-00007 Medium Density Residential(R-12) Preservation PAGF 1 01;15 SECTION II STAFF RECOMMENDATION � � � Y SECTION III BACKGROUND INFORMATION Project History The city is initiating this Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment to facilitate preservation of R- 12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use. Staff proposes the change in response to two development applications, both of which involve R-12 zoning. Two pre-application conferences were held in March and August of 2015 for proposals to rezone from C-P to R-12 or R-25 several contiguous parcels located on SW Spruce and 72nD Avenue (Site A). The owners and interested parties are supportive of the city's legislative proposal to accomplish this. In April 2015 the city received an application for a Comp Plan and Zone Change (CPA2015- 0003/ZON2015-00004) for a parcel owned by the school district zoned R-12 with frontage on Pacific Hwy (Site B). The Applicant proposed to change the plan and zoning designation of the site to General Commercial (C-G). In addition to this comprehensive plan and zoning map amendment request, the Applicant requested concurrent Site Development Review approval from the City to allow a 15,085 square foot (SF) specialty retail store with associated parking, circulation, landscaping and site improvements. These applications have been withdrawn, in favor of the city's legislative action to rezone the subject parcel, as proposed. Pursuant to the City's housing goal to provide opportunities for a variety of housing types to meet the diverse housing needs of current and future City residents, the affordable housing types allowed in the R-12 zone warrant the need to preserve R-12 zoned lands. The timing of the applications identified above is such that the city staff would have likely recommended denial of the proposed R-12 to C-G zone change to avoid loss of R-12 zoned land. However, the city's proposal combines the two zone change proposals so that a finding of no net loss of R-12 can be made through the legislative process. The locational characteristics of the subject parcels otherwise support the comp plan amendments and zone changes. The property zoned C-P (Site A) fronts on a local and a neighborhood street and is adjacent to property zoned R-4.5 and low-density unincorporated Washington County. The adjacent lower class streets and low density residential use zone makes the property more suitable for medium residential use that forms a transition from the C-G zone to the south and the R-12 zone to the north. Residential-zoned land adjacent to Pacific Hwy is rare in Tigard and is primarily associated with private and public school ownership and use, which is allowed conditionally in residential zones. The Tigard-Tualatin School District has identified the subject property (Site B) as surplus and intends to sell it for the highest best use. The proposed C-G zone is the dominant zone along Pacific Hwy (classified as Primary Arterial) and the existing zone of the adjacent parcels. This action would result in a net increase of 0.17 acres zoned R-12. SI'AF Rl?PORT To TIIF IT ANNING CONINUSSION CPA 2015-00005//.oN2015-00007 Medium Density Residential(R-12)Preservation 11.1GF 2 OF 15 Site Description Site A (3 parcels totaling 1.54 acres) is developed with single-family residences and was annexed in 2006 (ZCA2006-00003),which changed the county zone from Commercial Office (OC) to the City's Professional Commercial (C-P) zone, the zone most closely implementing the County's plan map designation. The current zone does not allow residential use, which the market has identified as its highest best use as evidenced by the pre-application conference applications cited above. The subject site is located across Spruce Street from Fred Meyers and within 1,000 feet of Pacific Hwy. Site B (1 parcel of 1.37 acres) is currently a vacant lot owned by the Tigard —Tualatin School District. The site abuts the south side of the Charles F. Tigard Elementary School. The subject property abuts SW Pacific Highway, a Principal Arterial that is designated in the Metro Urban Growth Functional Plan as a High Capacity Transit Corridor. The highway is also maintained and under jurisdictional ownership of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). The site is bordered to the east and west by commercial development. The property is the only parcel located along the highway between McKenzie Street and Canterbury Lane, an approximately 1.12 mile segment that is not currently designated for commercial use. The subject site is approximately .25 miles from the Metro Town Center adopted boundary. Proposal Description The city is initiating this Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment to facilitate preservation of R- 12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use. The City proposes changing the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning District Classifications of the subject parcels in SITE A (3 parcels totaling 1.54 acres) from Professional Commercial (C-P) to Medium Density Residential (R-12); and changing the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning Map Classifications of the subject parcel in SITE B (1 parcel of 1.37 acres) from Medium Density Residential (R-12) to General Commercial (C-G). SECTION IV. APPLICABLE CRITERIA, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS This section contains all the applicable city, state and metro policies, provisions, and criteria that apply to the proposed comprehensive plan amendment and zone change. Each section is addressed demonstrating how each requirement is met. APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (TITLE 18) Chapter 18.380: Chapter 18.380.020 Legislative Amendments to the Title and Map Zoning Map A. Legislative amendments. Legislative zoning map and text and Text amendments shall be undertaken by means of a Type IV procedure, as Amendments governed by Section 18.309.060G FINDING: The proposed legislative amendments are being reviewed under the Type IV legislative procedure as set forth in the chapter. This procedure requires public hearings before both the Planning Commission and City Council. ST.AI�1'Rl?P<)R"1'1Y)'1'I II?Y1,.1NN1NG CONINIISSION CP.1 2015-00005/ZoN2015-00007 Medium Dcnsity Residential(R-12) Preservation PAGE 3 01, 15 Chapter 18.390: Chapter 18.390.020. Description of Decision-Making Procedures Decision- B.4. Type IV Procedure. Type IV procedures apply to legislative Making matters. Legislative matters involve the creation, revision, or large-scale Procedures implementation of public policy. Type IV matters are considered initially by the Planning Commission with final decisions made by the City Council. FINDING: This Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning Districts map involves implementation of city policies as applied generally throughout the City of Tigard. Therefore it will be reviewed under the Type IV procedure as detailed in Section 18.390.060.G. In accordance with this section, the amendment is initially being considered by the Planning Commission with City Council making the final decision. Chapter 18.390: Chapter 18.390.060.G. Decision-making considerations. The Decision- recommendation by the Commission and the decision by the Council Making shall be based on consideration of the following factors: Procedures 1. The Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197; 2. Any federal or state statutes or regulations found applicable; 3. Any applicable Metro regulations; 4. Any applicable comprehensive plan policies; and 5. Any applicable provisions of the City's implementing ordinances. FINDING: Findings and conclusions are provided within this report for the applicable listed factors on which the recommendation by the Commission and the decision by the Council shall be based. CONCLUSION: Based on the fundings above and below, these provisions are met. APPLICABLE COMPREHENSIVE P1.=1N POLICIES Chapter 1: Citizen Involvement Goal 1.1 Provide citizens, affected agencies, and other jurisdictions the opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning process. Policy 2 The City shall define and publicize an appropriate role for citizens in each phase of the land use planning process. Policy 5 The opportunities for citizen involvement provided by the City shall be appropriate to the scale of the planning effort and shall involve a broad cross-section of the community. FINDING: Citizens, affected agencies, and other jurisdictions were given the "opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning process." Several opportunities for participation are built into the Comprehensive Plan amendment process, including: S"1':111KI?P<)R7'7'O"1'F11? PLANNING COMMISSION CTA 2015-00005//.ON2015-00007 Medium DensityResidential(R-12)Preservation P.AGF d OF 15 • Public Hearing notification requirements pursuant to Chapter 18.390.060 of the 'Tigard Community Development Code and Measure 56. Public hearing notice of the Planning Commission and City Council public hearings was sent to the interested parties list (11- 5-15) and all property owners within 500 feet of the subject parcels (11-19-15). Measure 56 Notice was mailed to subject property owners. • A notice was published in the November 19, 2015 issue of The Tigard Times (in accordance with Tigard Development Code Chapter 18.390). The notice invited public input and included the phone number of a contact person to answer questions. The notice also included the address of the City's webpage where the Staff Report to the Planning Commission could be viewed. • Both Sites A and B were posted with a notice board on November 23, 2015. • Posting on the City's web site (11-24-15) CONCLUSION: Based on the findings above, Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 1.1 Policies 2 and 5 are met. Chapter 2: Land Use Planning Goal 2.1 Maintain an up-to-date Comprehensive Plan, implementing regulations and action plans as the legislative basis of Tigard's land use planning program. Policy 1 The City's land use program shall establish a clear policy direction, comply with state and regional requirements, and serve its citizens' own interests. The goals and policies contained in the Tigard Comprehensive Plan provide the basis for the city's land use planning program. This policy is met. Policy 2 The City's land use regulations, related plans, and implementing actions shall be consistent with and implement its Comprehensive Plan. As described in this staff report, the amendment complies with all applicable statewide planning goals, regional regulations, comprehensive plan policies, and serves the interest of the citizens. This policy is met. Policy 3 The City shall coordinate the adoption, amendment, and implementation of its land use program with other potentially affected jurisdictions and agencies. Potentially affected jurisdictions and agencies were given an opportunity to comment. Any comments that were received are addressed in Section VI: Outside agency Comments. This policy is met. Policy 5 The City shall promote intense urban level development in Metro designated Centers and Corridors, and employment and industrial areas." STA 11 Rl?PORI'TO TI❑F:PLANNING COMMISSION CTA 2015-00005/%oN2015-00007 Medium Density Residential(R-12)Preservation PAGF 5 01, 15 The Metro 2040 Growth Concept Map shows that Pacific Hwy, through Tigard, is designated as a "Corridor." The proposal to up-zone Site B from residential to commercial would increase development intensity consistent with the "intense urban level development" envisioned for Metro designated corridors. This policy is met. Policy 6 The City shall promote the development and maintenance of a range of land use types which are of sufficient economic value to fund needed services and advance the community's social and fiscal stability. In a February 22, 2011 Economic Opportunities Analysis (EOA) conducted by Cogan Owens Cogan, LLC and FCS Group the forecasted 20-year vacant land need for commercial, mixed use and industrial lands in the City over the 2011 to 2031 time period was prepared. As noted in Table 7, Page 9 of the EOA, it was determined that the City would need a minimum of 51-acres of vacant commercial land to satisfy its commercial land needs over that 20-year growth period. A moderate estimate of commercial land need of 68-acres was identified and a high forecasted need of 85-acres was projected. As noted in the January 1, 2014 BLI prepared by the City, the City's most recent vacant lands inventory identified an existing vacant commercial inventory of 46.55-acres. The proposed comprehensive plan and zoning map amendment will help fill this projected deficit of available commercial land by adding 1.37-acres of commercial land to the City's vacant commercial land y improving the City's available commercial development inventory, thereb capacity. Furthermore, consistent with this plan policy, the proposed project will enable the transition of the site from school to private commercial use, thereby placing the property back on the public tax rolls and enabling the generation of property taxes from the newly created development. These projected public revenues will enable the funding of needed City services and advance the community's social and fiscal stability as desired. This Policy is met. Policy 7 The City's regulatory land use maps and development code shall implement the Comprehensive Plan by providing for needed urban land uses including: A. Residential; B. Commercial and office employment including business parks; C. Mixed use; D. Industrial; E. Overlay districts where natural resource protections or special planning and regulatory tools are warranted; and F. Public services According to Chapter 9, Economic Development of the City of Tigard comprehensive plan, approximately 85 percent of Tigard residents work outside of the City limits. Additionally, approximately 69 percent of the existing land in the City is zoned for residential use, while 31 percent is zoned for commercial, industrial, and mixed use development. The proposed zone STAFF RI?POR'1'"1'U'I'f II?Pl..ANNING C ,NINIISSION' CP,1 2015-00005%/.o)N2015-00007 Medium Demity Residential(R-12) Preservation PAGF 6 OF 15 change will ensure that this balance of residential and employment uses in the City is maintained with a loss of 1.57 acres of land zoned C-P, balanced with a gain of 1.37 acres of C-G (Site B), and 1.37 acres of land zoned R-12 is replaced with 1.57 acres of R-12 (Site A). This policy is met. Policy 15 In addition to other Comprehensive Plan goals and policies deemed applicable, amendments to Tigard's Comprehensive Plan/Zone Map shall be subject to the following specific criteria: A. Transportation and other public facilities and services shall be available, or committed to be made available, and of sufficient capacity to serve the land uses allowed by the proposed map designation; B. Development of land uses allowed by the new designation shall not negatively affect existing or planned transportation or other public facilities and services; ODOT's trip generation analysis for Site A (ODOT Comment letter, dated 12- 2-2015) showed a reduction of trips, from 220 PM trips under the current C-P zone to 43 PM trips under the proposed R-12 zone. Therefore, a determination of no significant adverse effect on the transportation system can be made for Site A. The transportation impacts for Site B have been detailed in the Transportation Impact Analysis prepared by Kittelson & Associates, Inc., dated July 15th, 2015. As described in the report, the project site can be developed while maintaining acceptable levels of service and safety on the existing transportation system. No changes in street classifications are necessary. However, the report recommends limiting movements at the SW School Road intersection with SW Pacific Highway to right-in, right-out, and left-in. The northeastern driveway access to the site from SW Pacific Highway will also be restricted and will be limited to a right-in and right-out to ensure safe access from SW Pacific Highway. The TPR `Future Conditions Analysis' on page 9 of the report identifies the potential impacts that the existing zoning and proposed zone change could have on the surrounding transportation system using reasonable worst-case development conditions. A detailed review of how the proposed zone change complies with the TPR begins on page 24 of the analysis. Proposed recommended mitigation measures are found on Page 25. Future development of the site will be required to implement these mitigation measures. In both Sites A and B, additional public services such as stormwater,water and sanitary sewer will connect to existing infrastructure and it is not anticipated that the proposed designation changes to R-12 for Site A and to G-C for Site B will result in additional demands on public services. This policy is met. C. The new land use designation shall fulfill a proven community need such as provision of needed commercial goods and services, employment, housing, public and community services, etc. in the S"1':U�1�Rl?YOR1'7'O'1'[ll?Pl,.ANNING COiA-INIISSR)N CTA 2015-00005/Xo)N2015-00007 Medium Densin'Residential(R-12) Preservation 11AG1?7()F15 particular location, versus other appropriately designated and developable properties; Site A's conversion from C-P to R-12 would compensate for the loss of R-12 in Site B. R-12 zoned land permits attached single-family and multi-family housing types, which contribute to the city's variety of more affordable housing stock. Site A is located at 72nd Avenue and Spruce Street, a neighborhood and local street, respectively, and is between land zoned low density residential on the north and general commercial to the south. This site is more suitable to residential use over that of Site B,which fronts Pacific Hwy, an arterial. Site B's conversion to C-G from R-12 would fulfill a proven community, need for employment and provision of goods in that location. The City's 2011 Economic Opportunities analysis (EOA) forecast a 20-year vacant land need for commercial, mixed use and industrial lands in the City over the 2011 to 2031 time period was prepared. As noted in Table 7, Page 9 of the EOA, it was determined that the City would need a minimum of 51- acres of vacant commercial land to satisfy its commercial land needs over that 20-year growth period. A moderate estimate of commercial land need of 68- acres was identified and a high forecasted need of 85-acres was projected. As noted in the January 1, 2014 BLI prepared by the City, the City's most recent vacant lands inventory identified an existing vacant commercial inventory of 46.55-acres. The proposed comprehensive plan and zoning map amendment will help fill this projected deficit of available commercial land by adding 1.37-acres of commercial land to the City's vacant commercial land inventory, thereby improving the City's available commercial development capacity. Furthermore, consistent with this plan policy, the proposed project will enable the transaction of the site from school to private commercial use, thereby placing the property back on the public tax rolls and enabling the generation of property taxes from the newly created development. These projected public revenues will enable the funding of needed City services and advance the community's social and fiscal stability as desired. Lastly, the proposed comprehensive plan amendment will help create employment opportunities for residents of Tigard, which currently sees approximately 85 percent of its employees work in other communities, according to Chapter 9, Economic Development of the City of Tigard comprehensive plan. This Policy is met. D. Demonstration that there is an inadequate amount of developable, appropriately designated, land for the land uses that would be allowed by the new designation; Rezoning Site A maintains existing R-12 zone capacity. S"1'.U�I�RI?POR"1"IY)"1'I I1?PI..ANN1NG COMMISSION CP.A 2015-00005%/.ON2015-00007 Medium Dewity Rcsidcntial(R-12)Preservation P.AGF 8 OF 15 As noted above for Site B, there is a projected minimum deficit of vacant commercial land of approximately 4.45-acres. The proposed comprehensive plan and zoning map amendment will reduce this projected deficit by approximately 1.37-acres. E. Demonstration that land uses allowed in the proposed designation could be developed in compliance with all applicable regulations and the purposes of any overlay district would be fulfilled; F. Land uses permitted by the proposed designation would be compatible, or capable of being made compatible, with environmental conditions and surrounding land uses; and The proposed zones in Sites A and B would allow uses compatible with adjacent uses; there is no reason to believe the property could not be developed in conformance with R-12 and C-G standards. There is no overlay district on the subject properties. "Phis policy is met. G. Demonstration that the amendment does not detract from the viability of the City's natural systems. The subject properties have been previously developed and are predominantly flat land without any sensitive natural resources. The proposed rezone would not detract from the viability of the City's natural systems. This policy is met. Policy 20 The City shall periodically review and if necessary update its Comprehensive Plan and regulatory maps and implementing measures to ensure they are current and responsive to community needs, provide reliable information, and conform to applicable state law, administrative rules, and regional requirements. The city is initiating this Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment to facilitate preservation of R-12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use. Staff proposes the change in response to disparate development community applications (Sites A and B), both involving R-12 zoning. The City's determination to update its Comprehensive Plan and Zoning map through this legislative process will ensure it is current and responsive to community needs and will conform to applicable state law, administrative rules, and regional requirements. This policy is met. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings above, Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 2.1 Policies 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 14, 15 and 20 are met. Chapter 10: Housing Goal 10.1 Provide opportunities for a variety of housing types at a range of price levels to meet the diverse housing needs of current and future City residents. Policy 1 The City shall adopt and maintain land use policies, codes, and standards that provide opportunities to develop a variety of housing STAF RI?PORI'TO TI IF ITANNING COMMISSION ( P.1 2015-00005//.oN2015-00007 Wdium Density Rcsideyitial(R-12) Preservation P.AGF 9 OF 15 types that meet the needs, preferences and financial capabilities of Tigard's present and future residents. Currently, approximately 69% of land is zoned for residential land uses. As noted in the January 1, 2014 BLI conducted by the City, there are a total of 34.26 acres of land zoned R-12 that are vacant. As identified in the City's most recent BLI map, dated January 1, 2014, the project site has not been identified as a buildable, likely due to its ownership by the school district and aggregation with adjoining school properties. Therefore, the conversion of the site's zoning district to C-G will not have a demonstrable effect on the planned residential capacity of the City. In 2013 the Council adopted a Housing Strategies report prepared by Angelo Planning Group and Johnson & Reid in support of the Periodic Review update to Goal 10, Housing. This report illustrated that at that time the city had about twice as much buildable land in areas zoned R-7 (72.1 net buildable acres) than in areas zoned R-12 (36.7 net buildable acres).The report analyzed the city's current and future housing needs, which included the following conclusions of relevance to the application: "In general, there is a need for some less expensive ownership units and rental units." "Single family attached units are projected to meet nearly 20% of future housing need." "It is projected that in coming decades a greater share of housing will be attached types,including attached single family." This type of housing is possible in the R-12 zone, which allows attached and multi-family housing on 3,050 square-foot lots. With this legislative action, the loss of R-12 zoning in Site B is replaced by the increase R-12 zoning in Site A, preserving a versatile residential zone to meet the preferences and financial capabilities of Tigard's present and future residents. This policy is met. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings above, Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 10.1 Policy 1 is met. APPLICABLE METRO REGULATIONS Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Title 1: Housing Capacity The Regional Framework Plan calls for a compact urban form and a "fair-share" approach to meeting regional housing needs. It is the purpose of Title 1 to accomplish these policies by requiring each city and county to maintain or increase its housing capacity. 3.07.120 Housing Capacity A. A city or county may reduce the minimum zoned capacity of the Central City or a Regional Center, Town Center, Corridor, Station Community or Main Street under subsection D or E. A city or county may reduce its minimum zoned capacity in other locations under subsections C, D or E. STAFF 1tFP()RT TO T1IF!PLANNING COMRIISSION (TA 2015-00005/XON2015-00007,N1edium Density Residential(R-12) Preservation P.AGI?10()F 15 Site B is located on Pacific Hwy, designated a "Corridor" in the Regional Framework Plan. Therefore, the proposed rezone of Site B from R-12 to C-G, reducing the minimum zoned capacity of R-12 zoned land, is subject to subsection D or E. E. A city or county may reduce the minimum zoned capacity of a single lot or parcel so long as the reduction has a negligible effect on the city's or county's overall minimum zoned residential capacity. As identified in the City's most recent BLI map, dated January 1, 2014, the project site has not been identified as buildable, likely due to its ownership by the school district and aggregation with adjoining school properties. Therefore, the conversion of the site's zoning district to C-G will not have a demonstrable effect on the planned residential capacity of the City. The City's Housing Strategies Report indicates that "in general, there is a need for some less expensive ownership units and rental units." This type of housing is possible in the R-12 zone, which allows attached and multi-family housing on 3,050 square-foot lots. With this legislative action, the loss of R-12 in Site B is replaced by the increase in R-12 in Site A, resulting in a marginal net increase of R-12 zoned land and preserving a versatile residential zone to meet the preferences and financial capabilities of Tigard's present and future residents. 'Phis policy is met. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings above, Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Title 1 is met. THE STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS AND GUIDELINES ADOPTED UNDER OREGON REVISED STATUTES CHAPTER 197 The City's Comprehensive Plan incorporated the Statewide Planning Goals and was acknowledged by the state as being in compliance with state law; therefore, the Statewide Goals are addressed under the Comprehensive Plan Policies Sections. The following Statewide Planning Goals are applicable: Goal 1: Citizen Involvement; Goal 2: Land Use Planning; Goal 10: Housing. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING RULE COMPLIANCE OAR Section 660-12-0060 Plan and Land Use Regulation Amendments (1) If an amendment to a functional plan, an acknowledged comprehensive plan, or a land use regulation (including a zoning map) would significantly affect an existing or planned transportation facility, then the local government must put in place measures as provided in section (2) of this rule, unless the amendment is allowed under section (3), (9) or (10) of this rule. A plan or land use regulation amendment significantly affects a transportation facility if it would: (a) Change the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility (exclusive of correction of map errors in an adopted plan); The proposed R-12 zone for Site A and C-G zone for Site B will not require or result in any changes to the functional classification of any transportation facility in the vicinity of the site. (b) Change standards implementing a functional classification system; or ST,AFT Rl?POR1'TO TIIF PI.,ANNING COMMISSION (P,A 2015-00005/Zo N2015-00007\-Tedium Dcnsity Residential(R-12)Preservation P,AGF 11 ()F15 The proposed C-G zoning will not require or result in any changes to the standards that implement the functional classification system. (c) Result in any of the effects listed in paragraphs (A) through (C) of this subsection based on projected conditions measured at the end of the planning period identified in the adopted TSP. As part of evaluating projected conditions, the amount of traffic projected to be generated within the area of the amendment may be reduced if the amendment includes an enforceable, ongoing requirement that would demonstrably limit traffic generation, including, but not limited to, transportation demand management. This reduction may diminish or completely eliminate the significant effect of the amendment. (A) Types or levels of travel or access that are inconsistent with the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility; The proposed R-12 zone for Site A will result in future traffic volumes and access in a manner consistent with the functional classification of SW 72'11-1 Avenue, a local street, and Spruce Street, a neighborhood route. ODOT's trip generation analysis for Site A (ODOT Comment letter, dated 12-2-2015) showed a reduction of trips, from 220 PM trips under the current C-P zone to 43 PM trips under the proposed R-12 zone. Therefore, with the reduction of trips under the new zone, the type and level of travel and access would be consistent with the existing functional classification of the transportation facilities. The proposed C-G zoning for Site B will result in future traffic volumes and access in a manner consistent with the functional classification of OR 99W in the study area. Although a component of the C-C, zoning site trips are expected to travel behind the subject property along SW School Road and SW Grant Avenue, due to a proposed left turn egress restriction at the OR 99W/SW School Road intersection, the amount is minor and should not be any, more significant than the buses that frequented this route when the subject site property was a bus storage facility for the Tigard-Tualatin School District. (B) Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility such that it would not meet the performance standards identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan; or The proposed C-G zoning for Site B will degrade the operational performance of the SW School Road/SW Garrett Street/OR 99W intersection with a v/c ratio of greater than 3.0 for the SW School Road approach under year 2035 weekday p.m. peak hour conditions (Appendix H, Kittelson July 15, 2015 TIA). This finding results in a "significant affect" determination, but is remedied by the site access control measures recommended in this report. (C) Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility that is otherwise projected to not meet the performance standards identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan. The OR 99W/SW Walnut Street intersection is projected to fail with a v/c ratio of 1.03 under year 2035 weekday p.m. peak hour conditions assuming development under the current R-12 zoning. Ilowever, because the v/c ratio remains the same at 1.03 under the proposed C-G zoning development scenario, the performance of this intersection is not degraded further. Therefore, a finding of"significant affect" is not triggered by this section of the TPR. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The proposed C-G zoning for the subject site has the potential to create a significant affect at an aligned OR 99W/SW School Road/SW Garrett Street intersection. This significant affect can be remedied by the STAFF RI,:PORTTOTIII� PL.ANNIN000NINIISSION CPA 2015-00005//.ON^_015-00007 iAlcdium DcnsitrResidential(R-12) Preservation P.AG,I?12 OIC 15 following mitigation measures, which are recommended to be applied to any future commercial development of the site through Site Development Review: • Maintain the current SW School Road alignment and access to OR 99W, but restrict turn movements to right-in/right-out/left-in only by constructing a raised concrete island and traffic separator in the center median lane of the highway. • Close the current site access to OR 99W across from SW Garrett Street, and construct a new site driveway near the northern property limits. The new driveway would be effectively restricted to right-in/right-out only movements due to the raised traffic separator that already exists in the median lane of the highway SECTION V. ADDITIONAL CITY STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard's Current Planning Division, Development Services Division (Engineering), and Public Works Department had an opportunity to review this proposal and had no objections. SECTION VI. OUTSIDE AGENCY COMMENTS The following agencies/jurisdictions had an opportunity to review this proposal and did not respond: Metro Land Use and Planning, Clean Water Services, Tigard Tualatin School District #23J, Washington County, Department of Land Use and Transportation, Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development. Oregon Department of Transportation, Region 1 reviewed this proposal and provided a comment letter dated December 2, 2015 from Marah Danielson, ODOT Development Review Planner. ODOT determined that for Site A (7303 SW Spruce St), vehicle trips to OR 99W intersections will likely be reduced and that the proposed zone change from C-P to R-12 does not significantly affect a state highway facility. ODOT determined that for Site B (13135 SW Pacific Highway), vehicle trips to OR 99W intersections at Walnut and Park under the proposed zone change from R-12 to C-G would not significantly affect a state highway facility. ODOT supports proposed mitigations to address the safety concern of introducing more vehicle turning conflicts at School Street onto OR 99W and recommends the following conditions on subsequent development of the site: 1. Restrict turn movements at the SW School Rd/OR 99W intersection to right-in/right-out/left-in only by constructing a raised concrete island (traffic separator) in the center of OR 99W to prevent vehicles from turning left onto the highway. 2. Close the existing site driveway to OR 99W across from SW Garret St and construction of a new site driveway near the northern property limits (the new driveway location would be restricted to right- in/right-out only movements due to the existing raised traffic separator on the highway). Future applications for development on the property at 13135 SW Pacific Hwy will be required to implement these mitigation measures through Site Development Review. STAFF IMTORI'TO TI IF IT ANNING COMMISSION CTA 201 5-00005/%ON2015-00007 Nledium Density Residential(R-12) Preservation R\GI�,13 OF 15 SECTION VII. INTERESTED PARTIES COMMENTS The city received one written comments from neighbors within 500 feet of the subject properties or persons on the interested parties list regarding the proposed amendment. Nathan and Ann Murdock, 7415 SW Spruce Street, commented that they are concerned about increased water runoff, increased traffic, and inadequate parking. RESPONSE: The proposed zone change will not result in any changes on the ground, directly. With future development the frontage of the property being developed may be affected, but your front or side yards would not, until you were to redevelop your own property. Property developed under the current commercial zoning (C-P) would also add additional traffic to the system. Traffic impacts are mitigated by improvements to the street network, as required by Tigard Development Code. The TDC also includes standards for stormwater runoff to mitigate the impacts of future development. Parking ratio requirements for new development are generally trending downward across the country as communities incorporate alternative transportation modes to the automobile. The subject property is within walking distance of transit on Pacific Hwy. Nevertheless, in a period of transition, parking is likely to remain an issue, as you have identified. Your ideas for alternative development with low-density or group housing would also require rezoning the property. However, the owners are currently proposing the R-12 Medium Density Residential zone, a zone that allows developers the flexibility to build both single-family detached, attached, and multi-family housing types. The city finds that the R-12 zoning anticipated by the owners/developers is consistent with the need for such housing in the face of limited supply. Therefore, the city is proposing this legislative rezone to ensure these housing types remain available. SECTION VIII. CONCLUSION The proposed changes comply with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals, applicable regional, state and federal regulations, the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, and applicable provisions of the City's implementing ordinances. Therefore, Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the proposed amendments to the Tigard City Council as determined through the public hearing process. December 7, 2015 PREPARED BY: Gary Pagenstecher DATE Associate Planner W��f December 7, 2015 APPROVED BY: Kemry Asher DATE Community Development Director STAFF RI?PORT PO TI Il?PLANNING CONINISSION CII A 2015-00005/'/.ON2015-00007 Mcdium Density Residential(R-12) Preservation PAGE 14 OF 15 Attachments: A: Site A B: Site B C: Kittelson TPR Analysis D: ODOT Comment Letter 12-1-2015 E. Murdock Comment Letter 12-7-2015 S1'.U�1'R1:POR'1'1'O77I1?PLANNING CONINIISSION C IIA 2015-00005/%oN2015-00007 Medium Den sihY Re,identia] (]t-12) Preservation PAGE 15 0F 15 VICINITY MAP y � � > CPA 2015-00005 PINE S T < ZON 2015-00007 g Z Medium Residential (R-12) �' - `N Preservation SITE A Subject Site C-P to R-12(1.54 acres) 1` L,' 1 R-4.5 a ►- � G Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. Approx.Scale 12,000-1 In=167 If Map printed at 09.19 AM on 05-Nov-15 I� DATA IS DERIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES.THE CITY OF TIGARD MAKES NO WARRANTY,REPRESENTATION OR GUARANTEE AS TO THE CONTENT,ACCURACY,TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY OF P't THE DATA PROVIDED HEREIN,THE CITY OF TIGARD SHALL ASSUME NO PR LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS,OMISSIONS OR INACCURACIES IN THE ^\ INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDLESS OF HOW CAUSED. City of Tigard Fit 13125 SW Hall Blvd a 25a TIGARD Tigard, 6 9- 417123 s (5)P www.tigardor.gov r"* r- L., VICINITY MAP �P CPA 2015-00005 C� ZON 2015-00007 Medium Residential (R-12) Preservation SITE B R-12 Tigard Subject Site Elementary ..i nT � 1 'C" ,y �1 r l .. I 4, C V R-4.5JI - r � ' Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. Approx.Scale 1.2,000-1 In=16/tt .A, Map printed at 09:11 AM on 05-Nov-15 / DATA IS DERIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES.THE CITY OF TIGaRD P MAKES NO WARRANTY,REPRESENTATION OR GUARANTEE AS TO THE CONTENT,ACCURACY.TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY OF THE DATA PROVIDED HEREIN,THE CITY OF TIGARD SHALL ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS,OMISSIONS.OR INACCURACIES IN THE Al INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDLESS OF HOW CAUSED. `J City of Tigard .-.. . Feet T,Ap 13125 SW Hall Blvd l� 250 . 's TIGAR MAPS Tigard,OR 97223 `N 503 639-4171 _���''� www.tigardor.gov Attachment C ITTELSON & ASS CIAT S , INC . TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING / PLAN N I N G I '. 610 SW Alder Street, Suite 700, Portland, OR 97205 503.228.5230 503.273.8169 July 15, 2015 Project#: 13755.05 Gary Pagenstecher City of Tigard, Community Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Transportation Impact Analysis for SW School Road/OR 99W Site Rezone—Tigard, OR Dear Mr. Pagenstecher: Leadership Circle, LLC, (the Applicant) is proposing a land use amendment that will change the zoning designation for a vacant 1.33-acre parcel located at 13125 SW Pacific Highway (OR 99W) in Tigard. Figure 1 shows a site vicinity map and the location of the subject property along OR 99W, across from SW Garrett Street, and along the north side of SW School Road. The site is currently zoned R-12 (Medium-density Residential District), which allows a variety of residential developments. The proposed zoning for the site is General Commercial (C-G) which is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses within a city-wide or regional trade area. The proposed zone change will also be consistent with the underlying comprehensive plan and zoning designations for all of the other properties along the OR 99W corridor. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING RULE The analysis contained in this report was prepared to address the requirements of Oregon's Transportation Planning Rule (TPR, OAR 660-012-0060, Reference 1). The TPR institutes criteria under which the transportation impacts of a post-acknowledgement plan amendment and zoning map amendment must be evaluated. The final section of this report contains a detailed review of how the proposed zone change complies with the TPR. SCOPE OF THE REPORT As stated above, this report evaluates the transportation-related impacts of the proposed site rezone and was prepared in accordance with the City of Tigard and Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) transportation standards. The scope of work for this study was developed through a scoping process with City and ODOT staff. The study intersections and overall study area for this project were selected based on a review of estimated site trip generation potential and distribution patterns, and local circulation patterns of the transportation system. It should be emphasized that the Applicant is also preparing a site development application to be processed concurrently with the site rezone. A separate traffic impact analysis, issued under separate cover, has been submitted to the City of Tigard and the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) to support the site development application. FILENAME.H:IPROJFILE113755-LEADERSHIPCIRCLE 5PECIALTYRETAIL1005-77GARDIREPORTIREZONE 77A 113755 REZONE REPORT 07152015.DOCX OR 99W/School Road Site Rezone July 2015 (NO SCALE) i i s k \ 99W s N � �y G' 90 N / SW PARK STREET N Is 9 E E n E 0 N h � 47 3 _a N b� O Yi 6 M O LL 26 O -I� h WASHINGTON COUNTY 8 � 47 219 217 p� 10 i^ 210 E m SITE m U g 99W r a m n s • -STUDY INTERSECTION SITE VICINITY MAP = TIGARD, OREGON ■ill KITTELSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING/PLANNING SW School Road/OR 99W Site Rezone—Tigard,OR Project#:13755.05 July 15,2015 Page:3 For this report, operational analyses were performed at the followillg=study intersections: ■ OR 99W/SW Park Street; ■ OR 99W/SW School Road (existing site access); ■ OR 99W/SW Garrett Street; ■ OR 99W/site driveway (proposed right-in/right-out site access); and, ■ OR 99W/SW Walnut Street. The following transportation issues were also addressed, as they relate to the proposed zone change: ■ Assessment of existing land-uses and transportation system conditions within the site vicinity; ■ Estimates of future traffic volumes for the weekday p.m. peak hour, consistent with the 2035 planning horizon for the City's Transportation System Plan; ■ Identification of planned transportation improvements in the study area; ■ Forecast year 2035 background traffic conditions during the weekday p.m. peak hour; ■ Average daily and weekday p.m. peak hour trip generation estimates for reasonable worst- case site development scenarios under the existing and the proposed zoning; +* • Forecast year 2035 total traffic conditions during the weekday p.m. peak hour, assuming reasonable worst-case developments occur on the site under the current R-12 and proposed C-G zoning; ■ Evaluation of traffic operations and safety solutions to mitigate potential "significant affect" on the existing and planned transportation system, under the proposed C-G zoning; and, ■ Key findings for compliance with the TPR; and, ■ Conclusions and recommendations. EXISTING CONDITIONS The existing conditions analysis identifies the site conditions, surrounding land uses, and current operational and geometric characteristics of the roadways within the study area. Baseline traffic conditions will be compared with future traffic conditions later in this report. Kittelson &Associates, Inc. (KAI) staff visited and inventoried the proposed rezone site and surrounding study area in December 2014. At that time, KAI collected information regarding site conditions, adjacent land uses, existing traffic operating conditions, and transportation facilities in the study area. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon SW School Road/OR 99W Site Rezone–Tigard,OR Project#:13755.05 July 15,2015 Page:4 Site Conditions The subject site is currently owned by the Tigard-Tualatin School District. Although it is vacant today, it served as a school bus storage facility for the school district from 2005 until 2013. Prior to 2005, the subject site was the location of the original elementary school, which is now located nearby to the northwest. A fully-directional site access is currently provided to OR 99W from SW School Road, which is a private road on the subject property that has private access easement leading to behind the subject property, where SW School Road then becomes a public local street. There is a second fully-directional site access driveway to OR 99W, immediately across from SW Garrett Street. This access has not been used in years and once served as one of the primary driveways to the former elementary school parking lot. Adjacent Land Uses The proposed rezone site is located within the City of Tigard limits, is currently vacant, and is zoned for R-12 medium-density residential. The site is bounded by SW Pacific Highway (OR 99W) to the southeast, by an existing specialty retail center to the southwest, by an established residential neighborhood, a Kids Campus daycare facility, and the Charles F. Tigard Elementary School to northwest, and by other established small retail land uses to the northeast. Transportation Facilities The primary street facility in the site vicinity is OR 99W, which is under the jurisdiction of ODOT. The other streets in the site vicinity include an arterial, two neighborhood routes, and local street/private access drive, all of which intersect OR 99W. Table 1 summarizes the existing transportation facilities in the site vicinity. Table 1: Existing Transportation Facilities F7___ Number Speed Limit aicycle On-Street Parking Roadway Functional classifilcation' ofLanes (-ph) Sidewalks Lanes Principal Arterial–City OR 99W Statewide Highway-ODOT 5 35 Yes Yes No SW Park Street Neighborhood Route 2 25 Yes Partial No SW School Road Local Street/Private Driven 23 NP No No No SW Garrett Street Neighborhood Route 2 25 Yes° No No SW Walnut Street Arterial 1 2-3 30 Yes No No Per City of Tigard Transportation System Plan and the Oregon Highway Plan(References 2 and 3). 2 School Road is a public local street from the rear site property line to SW Grant Avenue to the northwest. It is a private drive on the subject site property,including its connection with OR 99W. 3Although two-way travel is allowed on School Road,the pavement width is narrow,at 16-18 feet on the site property and approximately 16 feet on 711r the public portion of roadway. °Continuous sidewalks on the southern side of the street with partial sidewalk on the northern side of the street. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon SW School Road/OR 99W Site Rezone—Tigard,OR Project#:13755.05 July 15,2015 Page:5 Figure 2 displays the existing lane configurations and traffic control devices at the existing study intersections along OR 99W. Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Bicycle lane are currently provided in both directions on OR 99W. The other streets within the site vicinity do not include continuous bicycle facilities. Continuous sidewalks are present along all streets in the study area, with the exception of SW School Road. Along the site frontage of OR 99W, there is a pedestrian activated signal and crosswalk on the north leg of the OR 99W/SW Garrett Street intersection. This signal was installed back when the original elementary school was located on the subject site, but was maintained after the school moved to a new location on SW Walnut Street to the northwest. Current traffic counts indicate only 1 pedestrian used the ped signal crossing during the weekday p.m. peak hour from 4:00-5:00 p.m. and 9 pedestrians used the crossing during the following hour from 5:00-6:00 p.m. Transit Facilities Transit service is provided in the site vicinity by TriMet Bus routes 93, 94, and 45. Route 93 provides service along OR 99W Monday through Friday with 30 minute headways between Tigard and Sherwood. Additionally, Route 93 provides service and Saturdays and Sundays with 45-60 minute headways. Route 94 also provides service along OR 99W Monday through Friday with 30 minute headways between Tigard and central Portland. Route 45 provides service nearby along SW Walnut Street Monday through Friday with 30 minute headways between Tigard and central Portland. Additionally, Route 45 provides service and Saturdays and Sundays with 60-90 minute headways. There are bus stops (for Routes 93 and 94) located on the northeast corner of the OR 99W/SW Garrett Street intersection and the southwest corner of the OR 99W/School Road intersection. Existing Traffic Volumes and Peak Hour Operations In December 2014, manual turning-movement counts were obtained at all the existing study intersections along OR 99W. All counts were conducted on a typical mid-week day during the afternoon (4:00 to 6:00 p.m.) time period when commuter travel peaks along the OR 99W corridor. This time period is also consistent with the operational period assessed in the locally adopted TSP. For these reasons and as a requirement of the TPR, the weekday p.m. peak hour was selected as the critical analysis period for this study. Based on the traffic count data, the system peak hour was found to occur between 4:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. Figure 3 provides a summary of the existing traffic volumes at all existing study intersections during the weekday p.m. peak hour. Appendix "A" contains the traffic count worksheets used in this study. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon H.'Wrojfile113755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retai11005-TigardlDWGslFigsll3755.05_figs2.l.dwg Jul 15,2015-11.20am-pmamell Layout Tab.,02 O 1 M z ° D O � N - a O (/� v 4 Z n .� n z Ln z zD z D •�• _._ j M O m z D .. .. um zN z0 i D d ` Oa0� i y z � CO D i � DX Z �Z D� m z c7 m 0 -1 O p �• % D�-n O G) PrC ovy "N m<� Omz m zCl)U) 0 H.,Wrojfilel13755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retai11005-TigardlDWGsWigs113755.05 figs2.1.dwg M15,2015-11:20am-pmamell Layout Tab.-03 n m co K Igou n u n :Yj 0 vinz oviz 0 co M m--i Tr--i :mO 'C 0 5;G) mZ� M _<-m < Zm� nm� K o or o �v- mv-O o 0 r- 5-zt.O `. < AN CZnZCnZrn 1 o m F-< p N mm m ao� (7 0 r r 0 C Z D D Km N$'T Z Z �0r 2N > 00m0<(n � cW� cp n O� m5 rnu -( N mo �-Z+ < D 1 SND t ° 0 A n Z o m N � ~boa -.. m D i Qo r- o 1 5 Om < -um z� < DN �r Z 0 r Z Z � Z I CO a , �d o,m* �� �'se 's m m �5, o° a a° I� �S low 11 'Icnz 1 "* dd� 01 ? y D �p U) m`MZ G) \ i OX �' \ ��� i �W C) r �m0 Z� �����► ti2�sa� i m=� occz ZMU) N O v O SW School Road/OR 99W Site Rezone—Tigard,OR Project#:13755.05 July 15,2015 Page:8 Level of Service Standards All level of service (LOS) analyses described in this report were performed in accordance with the procedures stated in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM, Reference 4). A description of level of service and the criteria by which they are determined is presented in Appendix "B". Appendix "B" also indicates how level of service is measured and what is generally considered the acceptable range of level of service. Broadly speaking, LOS at signalized intersections reflects the average condition for all approaches to the intersection, whereas LOS at unsignalized intersections reflects conditions for the worst or "critical" approach/movement. All of the existing study intersections intersect OR 99W, where the jurisdictional standards of ODOT apply. ODOT uses a volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio metric to evaluate mobility conditions. Per the Oregon Highway Plan, the v/c ratio mobility target for OR 99W is 0.99 or less during the peak hours. This metric applies to mainline operations as well as intersecting street approaches and driveways. All intersection level-of-service evaluations used the peak 15-minute flow rate during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Using the peak 15-minute flow rate ensures that this analysis is based on a reasonable worst-case scenario. For this reason, the analysis reflects conditions that are only likely to occur for 15 minutes out of each average peak hour. The transportation system will likely operate under conditions better than those described in this report during all other time periods. Peak Hour Conditions ` Figure 3 also summarizes the existing traffic operations for all study intersections during the weekday p.m. peak hour. As shown, all of the study intersections currently operate at v/c ratios that are below the ODOT mobility standard of 0.99 or less during the weekday p.m. peak hour. Appendix "C"includes the level-of-service worksheets under existing traffic conditions. Traffic Safety The reported crash histories at all study intersections was reviewed to identify potential safety issues. ODOT provided crash records from the study intersections for the five-year period, from January 1, 2009, through December 31, 2013. Table 2 summarizes the crash data at the study intersections. Appendix "D"includes the crash data sheets. Table 2: Intersection Crash Summary(2009-20013) Crash Type Severity Total Crashes Rear Right Ped or Side Crashes per intersection End Angle Turning Bike Swipe Other PDO* Injury MEV' ii OR 99W/SW Park Street 6 1 3 3 7 10 0.18 OR 99W/SW School Road - - - 1 - - 1 1 0.02 OR 99W/SW Garrett Street 3 - 8 - 1 1 10 3 13 0.23 OR 99W/SW Walnut Street 6 1 14 1 3 2 17 10 27 0.43 'Million Entering Vehicles,as determined by multiplying PM peak hour entering volumes by a factor of 10 to estimate daily traffic. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon SW School Road/OR 99W Site Rezone—Tigard,OR Project#:13755.05 July 15,2015 Page:9 As shown in Table 2, reported crash rates were low and significantly below 1.0 crashes per million entering vehicles. This indicates there are no potential safety hazards. However, a closer inspection was made of the crash data where there were reoccurring crash type patterns. As shown in the previous table, 6 rear end crashes were reported at the OR 99W intersections with SW Park Street and SW Walnut Street. This crash pattern is common for signalized intersections in a heavily traveled corridor like OR 99W, where the effect of signal cycles create stop-and-go conditions for prevailing highway traffic. Therefore, no measures could be identified or recommended to help alieve the potential for this type of crash. The most prevalent crash pattern was at the OR 99W/SW Walnut Street intersection, which experienced 14 turning type crashes. Closer inspection of the data appear to indicate 8 these crashes involved the northeast-bound left-turning vehicles that turned in front of opposing through traffic. This left-turn movement currently operates with protected-permissive phasing (Flashing Left Arrow), which was modified from protected-only left-turn phasing back in 2010. However,the pattern of left-turning crashes was equally dispersed among the 5-year report history, so any pattern associated with the prior protected phasing and newer protected-permissive phasing could not be detected. It is also important to note that 8 turning-type crashes were reported for the OR 99W/SW Garrett Street intersection. Three of these crashes were related to a driver turning left onto OR 99W from SW Garrett Street and the remainder involved a right turn movement. As noted later in the Mitigation section of this study, a raised concrete island and traffic separator are recommended for the OR 99W/SW School Road intersection immediately south of SW Garrett Street. This measure will eliminate a key conflicting movement (left-out) from SW School Road, and thus, provide a more safe opportunity for drivers accessing OR 99W from SW Garrett Street. FUTURE CONDITIONS ANALYSIS The future conditions analysis identifies the potential impacts that the existing zoning and proposed zone change could have on the surrounding transportation system. The analysis was conducted according to the TPR (OAR 660-012-0060), which requires an assessment of reasonable worst-case development conditions for the subject under a future planning horizon that is consistent with the locally adopted transportation system plan. The City of Tigard TSP relies on a planning horizon year 2035. To analyze the effects of amending the site property rezone from R-12 to G-C, a long-term analysis was conducted for the planning horizon year 2035 as follows: ■ Planned and funded transportation improvements were identified in the study area; ■ Background traffic conditions for the year 2035 were analyzed at each of the study intersections during the weekday p.m. peak hour. Background growth in the site vicinity, was estimated based on City of Tigard TSP volume forecasts for years 2009 and 2035. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon SW School Road/OR 99W Site Rezone—Tigard,OR Project#:13755.05 July 15,2015 Page:10 ■ Reasonable worst case site development scenarios were developed under the current R-12 and proposed G-C zoning. ■ R-12 and G-C zone site generated trips were distributed to the study intersections based on the existing traffic patterns, knowledge of the local transportation network, and the location of major trip generators and destinations in the region. ■ Year 2035 traffic conditions were analyzed at each of the study intersections under the existing and proposed zoning development scenarios during the weekday p.m. peak hour. ■ Traffic operations and traffic safety solutions were identified to mitigate potential "significant affect" on the existing and planned transportation system, under the proposed C-G zoning. Year 2035 Background Traffic Conditions The year 2035 background traffic analysis identifies how the study area's transportation system will operate without any development on the subject site. This analysis serves as a baseline for comparison to other site development scenarios under the current and proposed zoning. Background Traffic Forecast Background year 2035 forecast volumes were derived from traffic growth projections from the City of Tigard TSP. The TSP documents a traffic forecast that accounts for anticipated growth in land uses city- wide as well as "financially constrained" roadway improvement projects that are expected to be built by the year 2035. Expected projects in the study area include a proposed extension of SW Walnut Street, from OR 99W to the existing stubbed ending of SW Ash Avenue to the east. Figure 4 illustrates the planned lane configurations and traffic control devices at the study intersections under year 2035 background traffic conditions. To fully develop the background traffic forecast, City of Tigard TSP volume forecasts for the years 2009 and 2035 were examined to determine a 21-year growth pattern. This growth was then added to the recent 2014 traffic counts at all study intersections to achieve a 2035 estimate. For a few turning movements, the calculated growth rate was negative, but the overall reduction was insignificant compared to the base traffic counts. Figure 5 displays the resulting forecast year 2035 background traffic volumes during the weekday p.m. peak hour. Operations Analysis Figure 5 also summarizes the 2035 background traffic operations for the study intersections under the weekday p.m. peak hour, assuming no development on the subject property. As shown, all intersections, except OR 99W/SW Walnut Street, are forecast to operate at levels which meet the ODOT mobility standard of v/c of 0.99 or less during the weekday p.m. peak hour.The OR 99W/SW Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon H.,Wrojfilel13755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retail1005-TigardlDWGsWigsl13755.05 figs2.l.dwg Jul 15,2015-11:201am-pmamell Layout Tab:04 F :TJ D m Cn 0m CD O o � (n C= m 40Z z Qo Cl) Z �~ o f CL z (A Z •�• iN zr n �� - - m t;1 D •. -DmD D N N Z Z 3 z0 a _ . 0 w a �d MS a 3 m mCD 0 5 2>4� W � m pa0 CD clm ANN � CO yC� m � M N W Ul W Z D � D O 37 00Z D0 m C)Z y� nm y —100 0 Oiz D m o O •�� ` 00:1) m<� Omz zcncn N 0 H:Iprojfile113755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retai11005-TigardlOWGslFigsll3755.05_figs2.l.dwg Jul 15,2015-11:20am-pmamell Layout Tab:05 < 0 o Q O n co VAQQ ) vCzO� rzC-) 7D m—-j T--1 :1) � 7Czmrnzm -1 Z � rr--cpm <_-m o + ZNC-) SNC-) O < m-4 m-1 r– G)— < 1 N K >37D Z37Z K DO mrq< D�m m o. OZ QmvanzaC)M ',��y yw�q m � nvr-mrr-� z i��0�ll zD Q (p D <Ov<mG) o ZU) C7 M——Mm Z (�D M m x m n r z n Z O Z m N �ti 20 9a D -� c)p v � 1 O Om m< rm m D U) �O r Z Z r z \ i �<pr0 > `t •d `\ o titer (j) �d M \ �R� �o 11 K,w 'sa oSCD Y Y N W Z Ln CSO C) O MZ m - y _ _ 0Dm s'z�" •%tip. - 1 1 DKC� o - P m O O D Z .-w�� r M;K0 m=� 000 O C Z Z 70 un c ro 0 SW School Road/OR 99W Site Rezone—Tigard,OR Project#:13755.05 July 15,2015 Page:13 Walnut Street intersection is forecast to operate with a V/C ratio of 1.02. Appendix "E" contains the:- year 2035 background traffic level-of-service worksheets. Year 2035 Total Traffic Conditions The total traffic conditions analysis forecasts how the study area's transportation system will operate in 2035 assuming reasonable worst-case development occurs on the site under the current R-12 and proposed C-G zoning. For the analysis, it is important to emphasize that primary access into and out of the site was assumed to occur at a new access point, or essentially a realignment of SW School Road, to intersect OR 99W directly across from SW Garrett Street. This was an improvement requested by City staff at a pre-application conference to test the concept of consolidating site driveways along OR 99W, eliminating a staggered configuration of intersecting streets on OR 99W, and creating a more efficient and safe four-legged intersection. This solution is illustrated in Figure 6, which shows the assumed lane configurations and traffic control devices at the study intersections under year 2035 total traffic conditions. Trip Generation The year 2035 site-generated traffic volumes were developed based on reasonable worst case estimates for site development under the existing R-12 zoning (16 apartments) and the proposed C-G zoning (two 3,000 SF fast food restaurants with drive-thru windows). Average daily as well as weekday p.m. peak hour trips were estimate from empirical observations at other similar developments, as summarized in the standard reference manual, Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE, Reference 5), as well as ITE's Trip Generation Handbook (Reference 6). Table 3 displays the reasonable worst case trip generation for both zoning scenarios as well as the net difference between the two scenarios. As shown, the proposed rezone has the potential to increase primary site generated trips by 1,268 average daily trips and 71 weekday p.m. peak hour trips. Table 3: 2035 Reasonable Worst Case Trip Generation Scenarios Weekday PM Peak Hour Trips ITE Zoning Land Use Code Size Average Daily Trips Total in Out Fast Food Restaurant w/Drive Thru Window 2.977 196 102 94 G-C(proposed) Pass By Trips(50%) 934 2 @(3,000 SF each) (1,488) (98) (49) (49) Primary Trips 1,489 98 53 45 R-12(existing) Apartments 220 16 units 221 27 17 10 Net Difference in Primary Trips(Proposed—Existing Zoning)) 1,268 71 34 37 Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon H:Iprojfile113755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retai11005-TigardlDWGslFigs113755.05figs2.i.dwg Jul 15,2015-11:20am-pmamell Layout Tab:06 33O 1 Z cn Meio ° cn D O ° N C T (n Z m C7 .� v z PO - z ���, z > z •� • W N y o z N ,, ° M O r - cu T n czi D � m 0 D(n 0 cz1 y - o m Z M (n N m mD m z Cl) w j o U) yNdd� a z O m 5 CD o OOd'- > �cn oa°� En CCD m a 0 N CCA) m ddd �r 0 IN z -- n Yro z n Y C D z O co D� z D� TI 0 n , r. i �i N f7 O -I O z 7 D O — MO n •�• /. p o m m<D Ong ZOO c ro o SW School Road/OR 99W Site Rezone—Tigard,OR Project#:13755.05 July 15,2015 Page:15 Site Trip Distrt utionfTrip Assignment - Site generated trips for the two zoning development scenarios were distributed to the studyH intersections based on the existing traffic patterns, knowledge of the local transportation network, and the location of major trip generators and destinations in the region. During the p.m. peak hour, this resulted in 55% of primary trips being routed to/from the southwest towards King City and Sherwood and 45% of the primary trips being routed from the northeast towards Beaverton and Portland. Figures 7 and 8 illustrate the trip distribution and total traffic assignments for the R-12 and G-C zoning scenarios, respectively. Also, for information purposes, a separate figure is provided in Appendix "F" to illustrate the separate pass-by and primary trip assignments for the C-G zoning development scenario. Total Traffic Conditions(Existing -12 Zoning) The weekday p.m. peak hour trip assignments from Figure 7 were added to the 2035 background traffic volumes from Figure 6 to estimate 2035 total traffic conditions for the existing R-12 zoning scenario. Figure 9 displays these volumes and also summarizes the operations at all study intersections. Under the 2035 R-12 zoning scenario, all of the study intersections, except OR 99W/SW Walnut Street forecast to operate within ODOT standards. The OR 99W/SW Walnut Street intersection is forecast to operate with a V/C ratio of 1.03.Appendix "G"includes the 2035 total traffic level-of-service worksheets under the existing R-12 zoning. Total Traffic Conditions(Proposed -G Zoning) The C-G zoning scenario total trip assignment from Figure 8 was added to the 2035 background traffic volumes in Figure 6 to estimate 2035 total traffic conditions for the proposed C-G zoning scenario. Figure 10 displays these volumes and also summarizes the operations at all study intersections. Under 2035 total traffic conditions with the proposed zoning the OR 99W/SW Walnut Street intersection is forecast to operate with a V/C ratio of 1.03. Additionally, the assumed realignment of SW School Road opposite SW Garrett Street on OR 99W resulted in a v/c ratio of greater than 3.0 for the SW School Road approach. In the case of the OR 99W/SW Walnut Street intersection, although the intersection is forecast to operate with a v/c ratio greater than ODOT's mobility standard of 0.99, the resulting v/c of 1.03 is no greater than what was determined for this intersection under the existing R-12 zoning scenario. TPR Section 660-012-0060(1) states that a plan or land use regulation amendment "significantly affects" a transportation facility if it would degrade the performance of a transportation facility that is otherwise projected to not meet the performance standards identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan. For guidance on what defines performance degradation, OHP Policy 1F.6 states that an amendment does not "significantly affect" a projected failing facility if the v/c ratio is not increased. Because the v/c ratio remains at 1.03 under both the current and proposed zoning development scenarios, the proposed C-G zoning will not "significantly affect" the OR 99W/SW Walnut Street intersection. ...............__....--....-------. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon H.Iprojfilel13755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retai11005-TigardlDWGslFigsl13755.05_figs2.l.dwg Jul 15,2015-11:20am-pmamell Layout Tab:07 a o r_ o � N I O 9 Z \ m i D m G1 N _._. N Z U) _ o M O �s cu ;a n z D rn DN Z- Z Z z n Z � � D w n m �(\NO MS o vlo o0 m 5 C7 SS 0 oa r 9y ~9 b N Y� O Z Z � v c 00 m c m �Z --1 Z D K , D mu ODO ~e x7`z DOM Ocz N 0 H.'Wroifile113755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retail1005-TigardlDWGsIFigs113755.05 rigs2.1.dwg Jut 15,2015-11:20am-pmamell Layout Tab:08 Igo O 1 -DI Z CL D m C ZNN O zD � m zN zZ z (7 i z :13 CO M `. My g ' C.) n m --1 v z 0--1 m M �5 � oao i q N -- O z z �S O D ' C m=� O f T. - Oz Y i <0 D -0Cl) i V — M Cl) :Dxz � MMK OOCz z37- c_ 0 H:Iprojfilell3755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retai11005-TigardlDWGslFigsI13755.05_figs2.I.dwg Jul 15,2015-11:20am-pmamell Layout Tab:09 n v C =i 5-.ZmcnZm =i D D >(q mfcn D Z i r c—m <—m > C" < Zm-nm-4 K o Or 0U)o— mv5O r 5� < D O � >:X)> �x r- K Q mr1< -i m o mn�mp zc)m -zi �sP,'.. Z 0—G) r r 0a to ZD v Onm0cn Lo ZU) n m--MX Z 1 g o m t 3 mm m n � ���� ���°� m z n � z Z m m �ti 20 9s G1 D -+ n p r 0 -1 O Zm < DU) p� r z o CoZ D r D wnm Ms C) i yNd 0 -4 m z m o° 0 oa i J. 0oy N n tioTm �d� ;r ml/ ate �� �C CO yc Iay 0 Ul O z � D � m n C) �0 M MO - v �? ti >� '� GOb m �N O> gq �i-► ����� �. 2 m=? OOz OCG) zM - N H:Iprojfile113755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retaf O05-TigardlDWGslFigs113755.05 rigs2.I.dwg Jul 15,2015-11:21am-pmamell Layout Tab.10 n m � � AM u u u u M m�nz Dinz D m 0— �zx mzm =l • _ i< a y r- r-��u, D r q fi +� m _< m � ftl < Zm� nm- � o Or OC/3v— m0—O O o r G1-<O lzozaoz < I m r-=1 �m m m p Z o mom Z0m Z '�,uy y6 4 ZQp Q pr-D DDr >?�-► Nwq v_) zD > MMF4MOTC W N Z D O<n 0 O<m ch 0o mN O M?vm< z ' x" 00 t _ 3 Gl D nOpm m p O < DN o� Z Z Z � i — D 1n j r _0 w n m A , cl) y z0 m ' -mi C IP ; oa0 ECK cn i b �� O Yc� CO D n n z � 0 a c� z i CO O C O i z A 0 N -<z _ , D-0Z DK0 <o� j 33 ""o vm� 1 wAm t y O D m �titir. � '�� M;K z B G) Om OC 8 SW School Road/OR 99W Site Rezone—Tigard,OR Project#:13755.05 July 15,2015 Page:20 As for the realigned OR 99W/SW School Road/SW Garrett Street intersection, the failing conditions on' the minor approach constitutes a "significant affect" for this highway facility. Appendix "H"includes the 2035 total traffic level-of-service worksheets under the proposed C-G zoning. EVALUATION OF TRAFFIC MITIGATION MEASURES Additional analysis was conducted to identify specific traffic mitigation measures designed to remedy the "significant affect" created by the proposed C-G zoning on the OR 99W/SW School Road/SW Garrett Street intersection. This resulted in a plan to rearrange the access scheme for the OR 99W site frontage and to restrict particular turn movements that were previously projected to fail. One of the two identified solutions is to maintain the current SW School Road alignment and access to OR 99W, and to restrict turn movements at the access to right-in/right-out/left-in (RIROLI) only by constructing a raised concrete island and traffic separator in the center median lane of the highway. A concept of the identified public improvement for the OR 99W site frontage is illustrated in Appendix "1". Figure 11 also illustrates the resulting lane configurations and traffic control devices under this mitigation scenario. As shown in both exhibits, left-out movements from SW School Road would now be effectively and safely restricted by the island and separator. Although this solution will cause some drivers destined for OR 99W to the northeast to turn right onto the highway and find a suitable location to turn around, most drivers are expected to travel back behind the subject site property using SW School Road and SW Grant Avenue to get to the signalized OR 99W/SW Park Street intersection, which is a safer and functional route. This pattern is illustrated in the mitigated C-G zoning site trip assignment Figure 12. The second identified solution is to develop a second site access driveway with OR 99W near the northern property limits. This is illustrated as Intersection #4 in Figure 11. As shown, the proposed driveway would be effectively restricted to right-in/right-out (RIRO) only movements due to the raised traffic separator that already exists in the median lane of the highway. This traffic separator was installed when the Jack in the Box restaurant across the street was developed. As shown in Figure 13, with the identified solutions in place, the two turn-restricted site accesses function adequately under year 2035 p.m. peak hour conditions, with a low v/c ratio of 0.28 at SW School Road and a low v/c ratio of 0.19 at the north site driveway. Traffic operations at SW Garrett Street are forecast to reach a v/c ratio of 0.80, which meets the ODOT mobility standard. Appendix "J" includes the 2035 mitigation level-of-service worksheets under the proposed C-G zoning. Based on these findings, the two identified site access treatments for OR 99W will remedy the "significant affect" created by the proposed C-G zoning and are recommended as conditions of approval. Furthermore, the Applicant is reasonably confident that access permits can be secured from ODOT for the identified site access treatments on OR 99W, particularly because there are two full- access connections along the OR 99W site frontage today and the proposed mitigation measures Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon H:Iprojfilei 13755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retai11005-TigardlDWGslFigsI13755.05 figs2.1.dwg Jul 15,2015-1 f^lam-pmamell Layout Tab.11 •�• 33 N D --i (n fn m O o m(n C - 1 Z o m 90 z CL dl u, zD m Z (A r o m D Dy N o Z — �� ZZ C:� zn m�g m o C.) CD=3 f' CD 2 0 CL mm o CD CA � yNdd� �CDCD CD CL m i' �� �, O o.m o 0.2. CD O D °gym a cn CUM a � OHO C >j(D S/ ti K �Ma CCDO �a - \ ,. Ul p N � 5 0 CD Ile Cn o CD tv6 CD C7 CDcia CD yC� ay z g �� TI x y C D ca @ CD z (l) D 0 z v °A d • �7 0 D -n 0 C7 N - 0i O —10 Z 12 0 0 •�• m G) 1A . Ong zU)z o H:Iprojrilel13755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retai11005-TigardlDWGslFigs113755.05_figs2.l.dwg Jul 15,2015-11:21am-pmamell Layout Tab:12 O O 10 w VXAL IR N � x 'am o r fD a0 n Z Z 90 -0 zD Cb Z U) m m 71 z n aCL �� s 0 cZi D 3 � m � D N o Z — — Z Z 31 20 0 a ~ n rd ri) yNd rn O , o AD a \\ s Oa0 r 20� Di C7 % IY ro Y z Y Z m � o U M me va _I <Z >K> �~ KD O>O Cbl ~� M?`z G)Om Ocz zm—i N O O H.,WrojCle113755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retail1005-TigaraIDWGsIFigs113755.05 figs2.l.dwg Jul 15,2015-11:21am-pmamell Layout Tab:13 n co M V I, n n u u V 00—&2 0 fn 2 0 co �....,,._.�� D� co rm <rm D ci M < ZmC) m� n � ? Or Ocnv— mv—O O o r E5 O 1N CZ0ZC:0Z < yo >m> z orm p i mrq< _�m m sv pZ � m0M C)m Z ' err 5� Q Q D Dr �`2�► N� z � > KmNM-nz Co m 61N m0mO� � oA m m 0 < n 1 t __._ 0 "' m n r ���.� t.��,o m Z 0 b O m N �ti °g'° D -i 0ry m my -i O O m < DN Z �� r _ r Z Z z0 — — I co 60 OC ! �wom �n SMS .`t (n . yNdb s, m �oo� �aO s, 'Y'Ip -, D 'soy otic C7 (7 �w CD /x o m / Cfl momv y m v� D D >Ko !g- m(b o Q>O cwP m=z G)oz z N o SW School Road/OR 99W Site Rezone—Tigard,OR Project#:13755.05 July 15,2015 Page:24 move in the direction of conformance with ODOT's access management and permitting policies (OAR Division 51, Reference 7). M Lastly, it should be emphasized that although the restricted left-turn movement from SW School Road will result in a modest increase in traffic on SW Grant Avenue, this solution will improve the safety of current users of the SW School Road highway access. Furthermore, this solution was embraced by local area residents who attended the recent neighborhood meeting; with one person noting how this solution is better than the over two dozen buses that frequented SW Grant Avenue to get to and from the former bus storage facility on the subject property. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING RULE COMPLIANCE OAR Section 660-12-0060 Plan and Land Use Regulation Amendments of the TPR sets forth the criteria for evaluating plan and land use regulation amendments. The criteria establish the determination of significant effect on a transportation system resulting from a land use action; where a significant affect is identified, the criteria establish the means for achieving compliance. The relevant portion of this section of the TPR is reproduced below in italics followed by the response for this project in bold text. 660-12-0060 Plan and Land Use Regulation Amendments (1) If an amendment to a functional plan, an acknowledged comprehensive plan, or a land use regulation (including a zoning map) would significantly affect an existing or planned transportation facility, then the local government must put in place measures as provided in section (2) of this rule, unless the amendment is allowed under section (3), (9) or(10)of this rule. A plan or land use regulation amendment significantly affects a transportation facility if it would: (a) Change the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility (exclusive of correction of map errors in an adopted plan); Response: The proposed C-G zoning will not require or result in any changes to the functional classification of any transportation facility in the vicinity of the site. (b)Change standards implementing a functional classification system; or Response: The proposed C-G zoning will not require or result in any changes to the standards that implement the functional classification system. (c) Result in any of the effects listed in paragraphs (A) through (C) of this subsection based on projected conditions measured at the end of the planning period identified in the adopted TSP. As part of evaluating projected conditions, the amount of traffic projected to be generated within the area of the amendment may be reduced if the amendment includes an enforceable, ongoing requirement that would demonstrably limit traffic generation, including, but not limited Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon SW School Road/OR 99W Site Rezone—Tigard,OR Project#:13755.05 July 15,2015 Page:25 to, transportation demand management. This reduction may diminish or completely eliminate the significant effect of the amendment. (A) Types or levels of travel or access that are inconsistent with the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility, Response:The proposed C-G zoning will result in future traffic volumes and access in a manner consistent with the functional classification of OR 99W in the study area. Although a component of the C-G zoning site trips are expected to travel behind the subject property along SW School Road and SW Grant Avenue, due to a proposed left- turn egress restriction at the OR 99W/SW School Road intersection, the amount is minor and should not be any more significant than the buses that frequented this route when the subject site property was a bus storage facility for the Tigard-Tualatin School District. (8)Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility such that it would not meet the performance standards identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan, or Response: The proposed C-G zoning will degrade the operational performance of the SW School Road/SW Garrett Street/OR 99W intersection with a v/c ratio of greater than 3.0 for the SW School Road approach under year 2035 weekday p.m. peak hour conditions. This finding results in a "significant affect" determination, but is remedied by the site access control measures recommended in this report. (C) Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility that is otherwise projected to not meet the performance standards identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan. Response: The OR 99W/SW Walnut Street intersection is projected to fail with a v/c ratio of 1.03 under year 2035 weekday p.m. peak hour conditions assuming development under the current R-12 zoning. However, because the v/c ratio remains the same at 1.03 under the proposed C-G zoning development scenario, the performance of this intersection is not degraded further. Therefore, a finding of "significant affect" is not triggered by this section of the TPR. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The proposed C-G zoning for the subject site has the potential to create a significant affect at an aligned OR 99W/SW School Road/SW Garrett Street intersection. This significant affect can be remedied by the following mitigation measures, which are recommended as conditions of approval for the C-G zoning: -- -- - Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon SW School Road/OR 99W Site Rezone—Tigard,OR Project#:13755.05 July 15,2015 Page:26 • Maintain the current SW School Road alignment and al cess to OR 99W, but restrict turn movements to right-in/right-out/left-in only by constructing a raised concrete island and traffic separator in the center median lane of the highway. • Close the current site access to OR 99W across from SW Garrett Street, and construct a new site driveway near the northern property limits. The new driveway would be effectively restricted to right-in/right-out only movements due to the raised traffic separator that already exists in the median lane of the highway. This concludes our transportation impact analysis for the proposed rezone of the OR 99W/SW School Road property in Tigard. If you have any questions regarding the analysis presented herein, please contact me at (503)-228-5230. Sincerely, KITTELSON &ASSOCIATES, INC. PRQpe " Brian J. Dunn, P.E. Patrick Marnell, E.I.T. Associated Engineer Transportation Analyst 13 Ail �1}SEP References: 1. The State of Oregon. Oregon Administrative Rules OAR 660-012-0060. Effective January 1, 2012. 2. City of Tigard. 2035 Transportation System Plan. November 2010. 3. Oregon Department of Transportation. 1999 Oregon Highway Plan. Including amendments 11/1/1999 - 11/21/2014. http•//www oreaon gov/ODOT/TD/TP/paaes/ohp 1999plan.aspx 4. Transportation Research Board. Highway Capacity Manual. 2010. 5. Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition. 2012. 6. Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition. August 2014. 7. The State of Oregon. Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter 734, Division 51 -Highway Approach Permitting, Access Control, and Access Management Standards.lune 30, 2014. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Attachment D Department of Transportation OregDn Region 1 Headquarters 123 NE Flanders Street Portland,Oregon 97209 Kate Brown,Go� (503) 731.8200 FAX (503) 731.8259 December 2"d, 2015 ODOT#6829 ODOT Response Project Name:Tigard Medium Density Applicant:City of Tigard Residential Preservation Comp Plan and Zoning Amendments Jurisdiction: City of Tigard Jurisdiction Case#: CPA2015-00005,ZON2015- 00007 Site Address: 7303 SW Spruce St, 10705/35 SW State Highway:OR 99W(Pacific Hwy) 72nd Ave, 13135 SW Pacific Hwy The site of this proposed land use amendments for properties located at Site A 7303 SW Spruce St and Site B 13135 SW Pacific Highway are in the vicinity of OR 99W. ODOT has jurisdiction of this facility and an interest in ensuring that this proposed land use is compatible with its safe and efficient operation. The City of Tigard proposes to change the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map for Site A from professional commercial district C-P to medium density residential R12 and for Site B from medium density residential R-12 to general commercial C-G.The Transportation Planning Rule OAR 660-012-0060 (TPR) requires local jurisdictions to make finding of no significant effect on transportation facilities or place conditions to mitigate a significant effect. We have the following comments relating to ODOT facilities: Site A: 7303 SW Spruce St ODOT prepared a quick trip generation analysis of the proposal to change the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning map from C-P to R12 and determined that the number of trips from the site will be reduced with the proposed amendment. Based on this information,we determined that vehicle trips to OR 99W intersections will likely be reduced and ODOT has determined that this proposed change does not significantly affect a state highway facility. Trip General Comparison - Existing Professional Commercial Zoning(CP):220 PM trips (assumptions: "Post Office—732"; 15,000 sf post office building size taken from averages around the region) - Proposed Medium Density Residential (R12):43 PM trips(assumptions: "Single Family Detached—210"; 1.45 ac lot; 3,050 sf/unit; doubled for inclusion of"Accessory Units") Site B: 13135 SW Pacific Highway ODOT has reviewed the TPR Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Kittelson and Associates dated July 15, 2015.The report analyzed the reasonable worst case traffic impacts for several intersections on OR 99W under existing R12 and proposed CG zoning for the year 3035 and recommended mitigation. Based on the analysis, the intersection of SW Walnut St will be operating above ODOT's mobility standard of.99 volume to capacity(v/c) ratio under the existing zoning at 1.03 v/c.With the proposed zoning the intersection operates at a 1.03 v/c ratio.According to the Oregon Highway Plan Policy 1F Mobility, if an intersection is already projected to operate above the mobility standard at the plan horizon under existing zoning then the performance measure is not to make it worse.Therefore, ODOT agrees that the proposed amendment does not significantly affect the intersection at OR 99W and Walnut St.The OR 99W and Park St intersection is projected to operate below ODOT standards under existing and proposed zoning and therefore would not have a significant effect. The report analyzed the crash history in the corridor on OR 99W from Walnut St to SW Park St and identified crashes relating to turning movement conflicts in the corridor. Under the existing zoning, there would be only 3 vehicles existing School St onto OR 99W during the PM peak hour.With the proposed zone change 21 vehicles would exit the site onto OR 99W during the PM peak hour. ODOT supports the applicant's proposed mitigations to address the safety concern of introducing more vehicle turning conflicts on OR 99W and recommends the following conditions of approval: 1. Restrict turn movements at the SW School Rd/OR 99W intersection to right-in/right-out/left-in only by constructing a raised concrete island (traffic separator) in the center of OR 99W to prevent vehicles from turning left onto the highway. 2. Close the existing site driveway to OR 99W across from SW Garret St and construction of a new site driveway near the northern property limits(the new driveway location would be restricted to right-in/right-out only movements due to the existing raised traffic separator on the highway). Thank you for providing ODOT the opportunity to comment on the proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map amendments. Please contact the ODOT Development Review Planner or Transportation Analyst below if you have any questions of need clarification. Please send a copy of the Notice of Decision including conditions of approval to: ODOT Region 1 Planning Development Review 123 NW Flanders St Portland, OR 97209 Regionl DEVREV Applications@odot.state.or.us Development Review Planner: Marah Danielson 503.731.8258, marah.b.danielson@odot.state.or.us Transportation Analyst: Andy Jeffrey PE 503.731.8200 Andy.jeffrey@odot.state.or.us Attachment E Fran: Nathan Murdock To: G Pagenstecher Subject: CPA 2015-00005,ZON 2015-00007 Med.Res.(R-12)Pres. Date: Monday,December 07,2015 11:38:14 AM Dec.7th,2015 Dear Gary Pagenstecher, We are writing in regards to the Public Hearing Notice we received for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change.After reading the notice we do have concerns(as Nathan has already talked to you)about the re designation of the land sited in Site A:7303 SW Spruce Street,10705 SW 72nd Ave,and 10735 SW 72nd Ave.This 3 parcel of land is 1.54 acres and the owner Is wanting to rezone this 3 parcels as Medium Density Residential R-12 Preservation.It is our understanding this to mean that the owner can place 12 units per acre or 18 unites on the 1.54 acres of land.With an average family of 4 this can bring 48 to 72 additional residents.Whether the owner places 12 or 18 unites on this 1.54 acres of land the concerns we have are Increase water runoff,increase traffic and inadequate parking in which is already a problem. If 12 or 18 units are placed on this 1.54 acres,we could also lose part of our front yard and part of our side yard,due to potential road improvements.We are in the process of revamping our front yard for a water fountain and/or flag pole.If sidewalks go in and we lose part of our yard,how do we prepare our front yard projects and water runoff problems?We have lived on this street for over 23 years,Ann has lived in the neighborhood her entire life(46 years)and water run off seems to cause more problems for the neighborhood every time some new construction happens. This neighborhood,Spruce and 72nd,is a quiet residential neighborhood.In the past few years this area has under gone many changes with Walmart,new houses on 78th and Spruce,Tigard Woods Condos,wetlands,and new detached condos on 74th.These changes have brought an increase in water runoff problems,increase of traffic and parking problems.We've had people parking in front of our house and across the street that are going to the new homes at the end of 74th and from Tigard Woods Condos on 76th Place.We've talked to those residents and they have told us that there isn't enough parking in those two locations.Now with more similar buildings going up,where are they to park? On the street or Fred Meyers parking lot?It also concerns us that delivery trucks trying to get into Fred Meyers will have problems due to more cars parking on the street so they can't make their turns.And of course,we have tried to get the City of Tigard to recognize these problems with no prevail,so people with mental issues,children,handicapped,seniors,children riding bikes and families have to walk in the streets that are not well lite and no sidewalks for the most part.And you want to approve more traffic of all kinds to go 72nd,Spruce St and on to 78th.Why? Increase in traffic on these streets has been a major problem.When the speed humps went in this detoured many cars from using this area as a short cut and also helped reduce the speed that cars were traveling at.But when the new developments were built,people moving in with the additional cars this has caused an increase in traffic and speed.The new speed humps are code but they do not slow the traffic down as much as the old ones did.The new developments that have gone in recently have not provided ample parking for those residents and as a consequence those residents are parking on Spruce and having to walk a block or two in distance to their homes.Adding in a potential of 12 to 18 units with 48 to 72 additional residents with on average 2 cars per residence plus teenage drivers within the family,that's an additional 24 to 36+cars on the 1.54 acres.Are these residents going to park on the streets or in Fred Meyer's parking lot and walk home? As we have stated Ann has lived in the Metzger area for 46 years,crime has continued to rise as fast as people move in to this once small quiet neighborhood. This small neighborhood is full of retired residents,middle class families and young families.We want this area to remain as such.Yes this area has issues but why complicate it and add to the issues,this only creates a larger problem.If we wanted to live in the likes of Portland we would have bought in Portland. To match the rest of the properties in the area perhaps divide the 1.54 acres into 3-6 parcels and build 3-6 single family homes.Or my idea would be to build a quiet hospice center that was in a home like setting still keeping it commercial. According to Homefacts.com our zip code of 97223 for 2010 has a 76.78%higher crime rate than the national average,2012 has an 87.89% higher crime rate than national average,in 2014 has a 98.73%higher than the national average for crime.Which can be broken down into vehicle theft,larceny theft,property crime,and robbery.Violent crimes such as aggressive assaults are 24%higher than the national average. Even with a margin for error these statics show that crime in our area has increased with the only thing changing is the increase of resident housing like,in apartments,condos and townhouses. Why change the zoning until you know the total plan of what Is to be built? Respectfully, Nathan and Ann Murdock 7415 SW Spruce Street Tigard Oregon 97223 503-810-0163 All - This email has been checked forvirusls by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com Appendix A Traffic Count Worksheets Type of peak hour being reported:System Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Hwy 99W--SW Walnut St QC JOB#: 13155601 CITY/STATE: Tigard, OR DATE: Wed Dec 03 2014 1730 1396 Peak-Hour:4:00 PM--5:00 PM 177 1532 21 Peak 15-Min: 4:30 PM--4:45 PM * L 1.7 3.1 0.0 331 +117J t 11 + 48 3.0 +4.3 t 0.0* 2.1 ,4 j• ; 0.0 5.9 268 139 +1 �, � 20 45 0.0 2.2 3.4 2.9 ,h * 137 1268 12 I Counts + * # i4.4 4.3 8.3 1691 1417 - --. � ; ;' ... _. 3.0 4.4 13 4P b L 0 t 0 0 t> 0 J11 � 12 F � 1 1 0 NA NA L + ^ t + 1TA .. t NA ~ ~ NA NA _" + NA «► z r .► r t NA 4 F � NA 5-Min Count Hwy 99W Hwy 99W SW Walnut St SW Walnut St Total Hourly Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Totals Beginning At Left Thru Ri ht u Left Thru Ri ht u Left Thru Ri ht u Left Thru Ri ht u 4.p11,P .14' 137" , fl 'I 4 11 4 S) t 3. 2 > 4 05 7 0 + 134 4 11 t1 t# T � 41f219 = 0 .140 1 _ 11 14 2 2 s1 � � - I,. 0 121 14 7fg _ Ott ' 1 2 4 11 t1 t} 103 6 r 13 €, 8 t 1 � F 0 .11 .. 1 ,.i 12 , 4 1 S x '101 4.b5 PT+rtAT13 dri0 i � 5:00 PM 11 83 1 0 4 106 18 0 9 1 19 0 1 1 1 0 255 33392 5:05 PM 10 102 1 0 2 115 24 0 13 0 10 0 1 2 3 0 283 3408 5:10 PM 791 1 0 2 137 13 0 12 1 11 0 2 2 3 0 282 3402 5:15 PM 6 108 2 0 2 136 21 0 13 1 15 0 3 3 2 0 312 3434 5:20 PM 12 103 4 0 0 126 26 0 11 0 9 0 1 2 0 0 294 3468 5:25 PM 10 100 1 0 1 122 21 0 11 3 7 0 2 1 1 0 280 3454 5:30 PM 19 119 2 0 2 114 22 0 15 1 16 0 1 2 0 0 313 3491 5:35 PM 16 98 1 0 2 108 27 0 13 3 16 0 1 2 2 0 289 3491 5:40 PM 9 102 2 0 2 100 29 0 9 1 9 0 0 1 1 0 265 3439 5:45 PM 12 75 0 0 0 108 32 0 10 0 9 0 1 0 1 0 248 3413 5:50 PM 12 100 1 0 2 88 35 0 15 4 13 0 3 0 0 0 273 3403 5:55 PM 1 21 120 1 0 3 101 24 0 10 1 15 0 1 0 3 0 300 1 3394 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Ri ht U Left Thru Ri ht U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total All Vehicles 116 1296 8 0 12 1608 212 0 112 24 104 0 20 8 8 0 3528 Heavy Trucks 0 76 0 0 48 8 8 D 0 0 0 0 140 Pedestrians 8 8 8 16 40 Bicycles 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Railroad [Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 12/5/2014 4:04 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.quaIitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Type of peak hour being reported:System Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Hwy 99W--SW School St/SW Garrett St OC JOB#: 13155602 CITYISTATE: Tigard, OR DATE:Wed Dec 03 2014 1664 1372 Peak-Hour:4:00 PM --5:00 PM # # 3.0 4.6 26 1611 27 Peak 15-Min:4:30 PM --4:45 PM # ♦ L 14) L 0.0 3.1 0.0 # V J # r► « 28 1 L35 44 0.0 ~0.0 "'� '�" L 2.9« 2.3 4. ..0 3 z .� *. �. s 62 0.0 0.0 �. 0.0 1.6 1 1336 35 # a: l Counts0.0 4.6 2.9F � 1621 1372 " ' # # 3.1 4.6 0 L 0 �► « 4 ` .. 6 o 0 0 '�, ,t r 0 0 � � 0 2 0 NA NA L L NA ~ NA NA r w NA # NA # NA F 5-Min Count Hwy 99W Hwy 99W SW School St/SW Garrett St SW School St/SW Garrett St Total Hourly Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Totals Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Ri ht U W-W �;:. 3 0 3 130 1k ":°' €f U 4 Q2 2fi6'_ 4:OS PM ;9# 3 0 4 19$' 1. 0 fit` D 0 . W _ 4:tU PM " 102 2 4," 6 0.1 0 0 t 1 0 2 0,1 �'F .. .3 138 0 4 _0_ : - S t071 ., U 1 122 ".. f3 tk .'C3 4 2 0" 2" 128 1 0 0 0' .- _ 3'" 0 r E� ..11V # 0 3 129 1 0 0' 0 },- ,_ ,. 0 �; 4; 0 1Q2 3 3 0 0 Q Q'= #1 t 1 3 O, • ., 2.." _ .. 154 0 _..0, 5:00 PM 1 87 3 0 2 128 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 228 3045 5:05 PM 0 117 0 0 1 128 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 249 3056 5:10 PM 0 91 3 0 3 129 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 233 3027 5:15 PM 0 108 3 0 4 140 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 257 3021 5:20 PM 0 122 3 0 4 97 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 232 2997 5:25 PM 0 107 2 0 3 129 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 257 3003 5:30 PM 0 120 6 0 4 148 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 283 3036 5:35 PM 0 102 2 0 4 122 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 240 3012 5:40 PM 0 106 0 0 1 105 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 218 2968 5:45 PM 0 99 2 0 0 108 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 217 2943 5:50 PM 0 107 3 0 2 101 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 216 2902 5:55 PM 1 0 126 2 0 2 109 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 243 1 2873 Peak 15-Min Northbound _ Southbound __Eastbound_________ Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Ri ht U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Ri ht U Total All Vehicles 0 1372 40 0 16 1584 20 0 4 0 4 0 16 0 48 0 3104 Heavy Trucks 0 92 4 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 136 Pedestrians 0 0 8 0 8 Bicycles 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Railroad Istopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 12/5/2014 4:04 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Type of peak hour being reported:System Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Hwy 99W--SW Park St QC JOB#: 13155603 CITY/STATE: Tigard, OR DATE: Wed Dec 03 2014 1613 1366 Peak-Hour: 4:00 PM--5:00 PM # 3.4 4.7 30 1563 20 I Peak 15-Min: 4:30 PM--4:45 PM # * L � # L 0.0 3.5 5.0 * t M d4 b 67 47 21 31 3 1.00 3 0.0 2.1 4.8 9.7 0.0 � ��4<'~ 0.0 85 35 7* 29 „. ts 1.2 00.0 �#1 �, �� 28.6�13.8 F 34 1297 7 I^ `. � 0.0 4.8 42.9 # * +. 1605 1338aL i la:Q 3.5 4.9 2 _j0 2 0 L +ji 4 0 t 0 0 F 0 2 0 # * 1 NA NA I ,J t f- I � J t NA ~ NA NA ~ NA '► ; '► ii r # NA ♦ F NA F 5-Min Count Hwy 99W Hwy 99W SW Park St SW Park St Total Hourly Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Totals nning At Left Thru Ri ht U Left Thru Ri ht U Left Thru Ri ht U Left Thru Ri ht U 417 2. 0 �: r 1 2 0 4 . .ss o 0 0 T o 2 2 itl 4 4 1.Q1 di �44$ _ 3 -n-2 0 �r 4 ft �' 4 4:15 RAA 1:17 0 2 1 0 f 2 4.20'PMt 1 1ig, 2 4 121 11 ft 1 EEx 2 4:25 _ 3 �'" # ., �. 427. 4 1 0 2 `' x 4.4610M- `.ta6 4 6l 2 127 4 2 4 0 101 jwl0 1. 94tH ' k4 8 t 0 :0 0 R62 ' 4AS_t —.: �__ 47 __. �?........,-.Q:._ � W....: .:': . 5:00 PM 1 82 0 0 0 126 3 0 2 D 1 0 1 0 4 0 220 3022 5:05 PM 4 114 1 0 0 123 5 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 253 3035 5:10 PM 8 88 0 0 0 110 7 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 219 2993 5:15 PM 3117 0 0 1 136 3 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 267 3005 5:20 PM 12 117 1 0 1 81 8 0 0 1 5 0 0 1 2 0 229 2975 5:25 PM 0 105 0 0 1 135 6 0 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 256 2981 5:30 PM 5 116 1 0 3 149 7 0 5 D 5 0 0 1 1 0 293 3024 5:35 PM 8 95 0 0 4 110 6 0 6 0 5 0 2 0 3 0 239 3004 5:40 PM 3 98 1 0 1 109 6 0 7 1 5 0 2 0 4 0 237 2987 5:45 PM 4 88 0 0 0 105 6 0 3 0 4 0 0 1 1 0 212 2951 5:50 PM 4 107 0 0 1 100 6 0 4 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 229 2918 5:55 PM 1 5 118 0 0 2 100 4 0 9 0 6 0 4 0 1 0 249 2903 Peak 15-Min Northbound _ _ Southbound Eastbound Westbound _- Flowrates Left Thru Ri ht U Left Thru Ri ht U Left Thru Ri ht U Left Thru Ri ht U Total All Vehicles 48 1320 4 0 20 1456 44 0 60 4 40 0 20 0 36 0 3052 Heavy Trucks 0 92 0 0 48 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 148 Pedestrians 0 8 8 0 16 Bicycles 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Railroad IStopped Buses Comments Report generated on 12/5/2014 4:05 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 4400 Appendix B Level of Service Concept APPENDIX LEVEL-OF-SERVICE CONCEPT Level of service (LOS) is a concept developed to quantify the degree of comfort (including such elements as travel time, number of stops, total amount of stopped delay, and impediments caused by other vehicles) afforded to drivers as they travel through an intersection or roadway segment. Six grades are used to denote the various level of service from "A" to"F".1 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS The six level-of-service grades are described qualitatively for signalized intersections in Table 131. Additionally, Table B2 identifies the relationship between level of service and average control delay per vehicle. Control delay is defined to include initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. Using this definition, Level of Service "D" is generally considered to represent the minimum acceptable design standard. Table B-1 Level-of-Service Definitions(Signalized Intersections) Level of Service Average Delay r Very low average control delay,less than 10 seconds per vehicle.This occurs when progression is extremely favorable,and most A vehicles arrive during the green phase.Most vehicles do not stop at all.Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay. Average control delay is greater than 10 seconds per vehicle and less than or equal to 20 seconds per vehicle.This generally occurs with good progression and/or short cycle lengths.More vehicles stop than for a level of service A,causing higher levels of B average delay. Average control delay is greater than 20 seconds per vehicle and less than or equal to 35 seconds per vehicle.These higher delays may result from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths.Individual cycle failures may begin to appear at this level. c The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level,although many still pass through the intersection without stopping. Average control delay is greater than 35 seconds per vehicle and less than or equal to 55 seconds per vehicle.The influence of congestion becomes more noticeable.Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression,long cycle length,or high volume/capacity ratios.Many vehicles stop,and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines.Individual cycle D failures are noticeable. Average control delay is greater than 55 seconds per vehicle and less than or equal to 80 seconds per vehicle.This is usually considered to be the limit of acceptable delay.These high delay values generally(but not always)indicate poor progression,long E cycle lengths,and high volume/capacity ratios.Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. Average control delay is in excess of 80 seconds per vehicle.This is considered to be unacceptable to most drivers.This condition often occurs with oversaturation.It may also occur at high volume/capacity ratios below 1.0 with many individual cycle failures. F Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also contribute to such high delay values. 1 Most of the material in this appendix is adapted from the Transportation Research Board,Highway Capacity Manual,(2000). Error!No text of specified style in document. Error!No text of specified style in document. Error!No text of specified style in document. Table B2 Level-of-Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections Level of Service Average Control Delay per vehicle(Seconds) A <10.0 B >10 and<_20 C >20 and<_35 D >35 and<_55 E >55 and<_80 F >80 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Unsignalized intersections include two-way stop-controlled (TWSC) and all-way stop-controlled (AWSC) intersections. The 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) provides models for estimating control delay at both TWSC and AWSC intersections. A qualitative description of the various service levels associated with an unsignalized intersection is presented in Table B3. A quantitative definition of level of service for unsignalized intersections is presented in Table B4. Using this definition, Level of Service "E" is generally considered to represent the minimum acceptable design standard. Table B3 Level-of-Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections Delayservice Average • Nearly all drivers find freedom of operation. • Very seldom is there more than one vehicle in queue. A • Some drivers begin to consider the delay an inconvenience. • Occasionally there is more than one vehicle in queue. B • Many times there is more than one vehicle in queue. • Most drivers feel restricted,but not objectionably so. C • Often there is more than one vehicle in queue. • Drivers feel quite restricted. D • Represents a condition in which the demand is near or equal to the probable maximum number of vehicles that can be accommodated by the movement. • There is almost always more than one vehicle in queue. • Drivers find the delays approaching intolerable levels. E • Forced flow. • Represents an intersection failure condition that is caused by geometric and/or operational constraints external to the intersection. F 2 Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Error!No text of specified style in document. Error!No text of specified style in document. Error!No text of specified style in document. Table 134 Level-of-Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections Emia 7BA <10.0>10.Oand<_15.0 >15.0 and<_25.0 D >25.0 and<_35.0 E >35.0 and<_50.0 F >50.0 It should be noted that the level-of-service criteria for unsignalized intersections are somewhat different than the criteria used for signalized intersections. The primary reason for this difference is that drivers expect different levels of performance from different kinds of transportation facilities. The expectation is that a signalized intersection is designed to carry higher traffic volumes than an unsignalized intersection. Additionally, there are a number of driver behavior considerations that combine to make delays at signalized intersections less galling than at unsignalized intersections. For example, drivers at signalized intersections are able to relax during the red interval, while drivers on the minor street approaches to TWSC intersections must remain attentive to the task of identifying acceptable gaps and vehicle conflicts. Also, there is often much more variability in the amount of delay experienced by individual drivers at unsignalized intersections than signalized intersections. For these reasons, it is considered that the control delay threshold for any given level of service is less for an unsignalized intersection than for a signalized intersection. While overall intersection level of service is calculated for AWSC intersections, level of service is only calculated for the minor approaches and the major street left turn movements at TWSC intersections. No delay is assumed to the major street through movements. For TWSC intersections, the overall intersection level of service remains undefined: level of service is only calculated for each minor street lane. In the performance evaluation of TWSC intersections, it is important to consider other measures of effectiveness (MOEs) in addition to delay, such as v/c ratios for individual movements, average queue lengths, and 95th-percentile queue lengths. By focusing on a single MOE for the worst movement only, such as delay for the minor-street left turn, users may make inappropriate traffic control decisions. The potential for making such inappropriate decisions is likely to be particularly pronounced when the HCM level-of-service thresholds are adopted as legal standards, as is the case in many public agencies. ...----.. ......... ..........._... .......-_ ........._ .... ......... -._... .............._..... __..._ .... _._-- -- 3 Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Appendix C Existing Traffic Level-Of- Service Worksheets HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2014 ExistingTraffic Weekday PM Peak Hour 1 : SW Park St & Hwy 99W 4/8/2015 Lane Configurations Vi T1a Volume(veh/h) 34 1297 7 20 1563 30 7 3 21; 47 3 35 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00E 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1900 1806 1900 1810 1846 1900 1900 1579 1810 1863 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 34 1310 7 20 1579 30 7 3 21 47 3 0 Adj No.of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 : 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.09 0.99 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 5 5 5 3 3 0 0 5 2 0 0 Cap,veh/h 310 2919 16 374 2916 55 90 29 88; 122 109 93 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.83 0.83 0.02 0.83 0.83 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1810 3499 19 1723 3519 67 800 510 1522 1368 1900 1615 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 34 642 675 20 786 823 10 0 21 47 3 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1810 1716 1802 1723 1753 1832 1310 0 1522 1368 1900 1615 Q Serve(g s),s 0.4 13.9 13.9 0.3 19.5 19.6 0.0 0.0 1.8 4.7 0.2 0.0 Cycle Q lear(g_ ),s 0.4 13.9 13.9 0.3 19.5 19.6 0.8 0.0 1.8 5.6 0.2 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.04 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.00 Larne Grp Cap(c),veh/h 310 1431 1503 374 1453 1518 119 0 88 122 109 93 V/C Ratio(X) 0.11 0.45 0.45 0.05 0.54 0.54 0.08 0.00 0.24 0.39 0.03 0.00 Avail CWe a),veh/h 479 1431 1503 545 1453 1518 201 0 185 209 231 196 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 wwr+a UpstreamFitter(I) 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.0U' 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 3.1 3.1 3.1 2.4 3.7 3.7 62.6 0.0 63.0 65.2 62.3 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 0.1 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.4 1 A 0.2 0.0 0.9 1.2 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(-26165%),veh/In 0.2 6.8 7.2 0.1 9.7 10.2 0.4 0.0 0.8 1.8 0.1 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 3.2 4.1 4.0 2.4 5.2 5.1 62.8 0.0 63.9 66.4 62.3 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A E E E E Approach Vol,veh/h 1351 1629 31 50 Approach Delay,s/veh 4.1 5.1 63.5 66.2 Approach LOS A A E . E Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 62 121.8 12.1 6.9 121.0 12.1 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 Max Green Setting(Gmax) s 16:0 94.0 17.0 16.0 94.0 17.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 2.3 15.9 7.6 2.4 21.6 3.8 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 0.0 72.9 0.1 0.0 67.9 0.1 ,.n HCM 2010 dbl Delay 6.2 HCM 2010 LOS A " H:lprojfile113755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retai11005-TigardlSynchro113755.5-2014_PM-Existing.syn Synchro 8- Report %user name% Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2014 ExistingTraffic Weekday PM Peak Hour 1 : SW Park St & Hwy 99W 41812015 r t 4" T /0� ....E Lane Configurations '� fi1a '� �� t r Volume(vph) 34 1297 7 20 1563 30 7 3 21 47 3 35 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 " 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Said.Flow(prot) 1805 3428 1718 3495 1526 1512 1761 1900 1615 Fit Permitted 0.13 1.00 0.19 1.00 0.84 1.00 0.75 1.00 1.00 Satd Flow(perm) 250 3428 342 3495 1327 1512 1392 1900 1615 Peak-hour factor,PHF 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 Adj.Flow(vph) 34 1310 7 20 1579 30 7 3 21 47 3 35 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 20 0 0 33 Lane Group Flow(vph) 34 1317 0 20 1608 0 0 10 1 47 3 2 Confl.Peds.(#/hr) 3 7 7 3 2 2 Confl.Bikes(#/hr) 2 2 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 5% 43% 5% 3% 0% 29% 0% 5% 2% 0% 0% Tum Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 4 4 Actuated Green,G(s) 118.1 114.9 117.9 114.8 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Effective Green,g(s) 118.1 114.9 117.9 114.8 9.0 90 9.0 9.0 9.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.84 0.82 0.84 0.82 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 40 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension(s) 2.3 4.8 2.3 4.8 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 246 2813 318 2865 `' 85 97 89 122 103 v/s Ratio Prot c0.00 0.38 0.00 c0.46 0.00 v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 0.05 0.01 4.00 c0.03 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.14 0.47 0.06 0.56 0.12 0.01 0.53 0.02 0.02 Uniform Delay,d1 3.0 3.7 2.2 4.2 61.8 61.3 63.4 61.4 61.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.20 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 Delay(s) 3.1 4.2 3.1 5.4 62.1 61.4 67.0 61.4 61.4 Level of Service A A A A E E E E E Approach Delay(s) 4.2 5.4 61.6 64.5 Approach LOS A A E E 3 HCM 2000 Control Delay 7.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service A HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.55 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 140.0 Sum of lost time(s) 13.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group H:1 roJfle113755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retail1005-Ti ard1S nchro113755.5-2014_PM-Existin .s n S nchro 8- Report %user name% Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2014 ExistingTraffic Weekday PM Peak Hour 2: Hwy 99W & SW School St 4/8/2015 Int Delay,s/veh 0.1 Vol,veh 1 1371 1619 26 1 2 " Conflicting Peds,#/hr 4 0 0 4 1 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 90 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 4 Peak Hour Factor 99 99 99 99 99 99 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 5 2 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 1 1385 1635 26 1 2 k. Conflicting Flow All 1663 0 0 2343 836 Stage 1 1649 Stage 2 - 694 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 6.8 6.9 Crt#icat Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 5,8 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.8 _ Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 392 - 31 315 Stage 1 145 - Stage 2 _ 462 - Platoon blocked,% _ Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 391 - - - 31 314 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - _ 31 Stage 1 _ 145 _ Stage 2 - - 464 HCM Control Delay,s 0 0 53 HCM LCIS F MEMO 1� } WOMEgym, r5 I M11M Capacity(veh/h) 391 78 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - 0.039 HCM Control Delay(s) 14.2 - - 53 HCM Lane OS B F HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 0.1 H:Iprojfile113755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retai11005-Tigard\Synchro113755.5-2014_PM-Existing.syn Synchro 8- Report %user name% Page 3 HCM 2010 TWSC 2014 ExistingTraffic Weekday PM Peak Hour 3: SW Garrett St & Hwy 99W 418/2015 Int Delay,s/veh 0.4 a, -13 Vol,veh/h 1337 35 27 1537 8 36 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free`. Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 150 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - - 0 1 Grade,% 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 Heavy Vehicles,% 5 5 2 3 0 3 Mvmt Flow 1364 36 28 1670 8 37 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1400 0 2272 700 Stage 1 - - - - 1382 - Stage 2 - - 890 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.8 6.96 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.8 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.8 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 3.5 3.33 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 484 - 35 379 Stage 1 202 - Stage 2 - - - - 366 - Platoon blacked,°Jo - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 484 - 33 379 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 130 Stage 1 - - - - 202 Stage 2 345 - HCM Control Delay,s 0 0.2 20.2 HCM LOS C Capacity(veh/h) 281 - - 484 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0,16 - 0.057 - HCM Control Delay(s) 20.2 12.9 HCM Lane LDS C - B' - HCM 95th%tileQ(veh) 0.6 - 0.2 - H:lprojfile113755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retai11005-TigardlSynchro113755.5-2014_PM-Existing.syn Synchro 8- Report %user name% Page 4 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2014 ExistingTraffic Weekday PM Peak Hour 5: SW Walnut St & Hwy 99W 4/8/2015 to %t Lane Configurations Vi TI* Vi tt if ►� , Volume(veh/h) 137 1268 12 21 1532 177 20 17 11 117 12 139 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial Q(pb),veh0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A pbT) 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00° 1.00 1.00 1.80 1.80 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1827 1826 1900 1900 1845 1863 1900 1860 1900 1827 1849 1900 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 140 1294 12 21 1563 181 20 17 11 119 12 142 Adj No.of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0,98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh,% 4 4 4 0 3 2 6 6 6 4 0 0 Cap,veh/h 170 1768 16 127 1552 677 0 40 26 144 18 215 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.50 0.50 0.02 0.44 0.44 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.08 0.15 0.15 Sat Flow,veh/h 1740 3822 33 1810 3505 1528 0 1013 655 1740 121 1431` Grp Volume(v),veh/h 140 637 669 21 1563 181 0 0 28 119 0 154 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1740 1735 1819 1810 1752 1528 0 0 1668 1740 0 1552 Q Serve(g_s),s 6.9 40.5 40.5 0.9 62.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 2.3 9.4 0.0 13.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_p),s 6.9 40.5 40.5 0.9 62.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 2.3 9.4 0.0 13.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.02 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.39 1.00 0.92 Lane GrpCap(c),veh/h 170 871 914 127 1552 677 0 0 66 144 0 234 V/C Ratio(X) 0.82 0.73 0.73 0.17 1.01 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.83 0.00 0.66 Avail Cap(c a),veh/h 288 871 914 266 1552 677 10 0 250 261 6 24 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 . 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 62.7 27.4 27.4 29.9 39.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 65.7 63.3 0.0 56.1 Ina Delay(d2),s/veh 61 5.4 5.2 0.4 24.6 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.6' 7.3 0.0 5.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °lade BackOfQ(-26165%),vehtln 5.6 20.6 21.6 0.5 35.3 1.5 0.0 0.0 1.1 4.8 0.0 6,0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 68.8 32.8 32.6 30.3 63.6 3.3 0.0 0.0 68.3 70.6 0.0 61.9 tP 40 l.oS E C C C F A E E E Approach Vol,veh/h 1446 1765 28 273 Approach Delay,s/veh 36.2 57.0 68.3 65.7 Approach LOS D E E E Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 56 9 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 62 75.3 0.0 25.1 14.5 67.0 15.5 9.5 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 *5 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting(Gmax) s 13.0 68.0 21.0 21.0 19.0 *62 21.0 21.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 2.9 42.5 0.0 15.1 8.9 64.0 11.4 4.3 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 0,0 17.0 0.0 0.4 0.7 0.4 0.1 0.3 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 49.2 HCM 2010 LOS p W201 190M ,w *HCM 2010 computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. %%w H:lprojfile113755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retai11005-TigardlSynchro113755.5-2014_PM-Existing.syn Synchro 8- Report %user name% Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2014 ExistingTraffic Weekday PM Peak Hour 5: SW Walnut St & Hwy 99W 418/2015 Lane Configurations r 4+ Volume(vph) 137 1268 12 21 1532 177 20 17 11 117 12 139 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0'' 40 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 1.00 0:97 Flpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Frt 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.97 1.00 0.86 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00 Satd.Flaw(prot) 1736 3463 1805 3505 1497 1737 1736 1541 Flt Permitted 0.06 1.00 0.10 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 Sattl Flaw(perm) 114 3463 188 3505 1497 1514 1736 1541 Peak-hour factor,PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj.Flow(vph) 140 1294 12 21 1563 181 20` 17 11 119 12 142 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 0 0 0 41 0 8 0 0 102 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 140 1306 0 21 1563 140 0 40 0 119 52 0 Confl.Peds.(#/hr) 7 11 11 7 12 13 13 12 Confl.Bikes(#/hr) 1 3 Heavy Vehicles(%) 4% 4% 8% 0% 3% 2% 0% 6% 0% 4% 0% 3% Tum Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 6 Actuated Green,G(s) 84.9 83.9 67.1 67.1 67.1 20.9 14.4 39.3 Effective Green,g(s) 84.9 83.9 67.1 67.1 67.1 20.9 14.4 39.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 0.60 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.15 0.10 0.28 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension(s) 2.3 4.8 2.3 4.8 4.8 2.3 2.3 2.3 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 307 2075 133 1679 717 226 178 432 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.38 0.00 c0.45 c0.07 0.03 vls Ratio,Perm 0.21 0.07 0.09 c0.03 v/c Ratio 0.46 0.63 0.16 0.93 0.20 0.18 0.67 0.12 Uniform Delay,d/ 45.7 18.0 23.5 34.3 20.9` 52.0 60.5 37.5 Progression Factor 0.92 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 0.6 1.4 0.3 10.7 ± 0.6 0.2 7.8 0.1 Delay(s) 42.7 16.7 23.8 45.0 21.6 52.3 68.3 37.6 Level of Service D B C D C D E D Approach Delay(s) 19.3 42.4 52.3 51.0 Approach LDS B D D D w HCM 2000 Control Delay 33.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service G HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73 Actuated cycle Length(s) 140.0 sum of lost time(s) 17.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group H:1 ro1fle113755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retail\005-Ti ard1S nchro113755.5-2014_PM-Existin .s n S nchro 8- Report %user name% Page 4 Appendix D Crash Data , i w W � o a F z W Wo 0 z N N� z� a 0 a ❑U GI O low a a Z v v= 'I v v > v n .x a 'I v x x x v v i rt a a s r a a a a a s F re 0 0 0 0 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 r h r^HL 7 z Z I Z 2 L h W w W Z % Z 14 a a a a a a a a a K CSL IL n a Z ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ fl ❑ ❑ Cl Ha y N a o a o 0 0 F b F w N W N WEms+ CD a W H a W Z a W E. a W H a O Z >a U' 0 7 ❑❑ Pr[L 3 W O F O a T O a Z O C� 2 7 O a Z O W Z n W Z Z O C4 O 1 Z a a s v v F o m<m m a f� N E, f� 0 0 ao> .v', o0 m < 0 rr a rna a�U a❑ U V U v� m ❑ � W ❑ [.- H i� W ❑ i W n rn a rn a s rn a s H >0+ a� a0.a uon uon Zzr=i zza aaa Z m m ar .7 P ❑ b p ❑ U C�❑ No ❑Er owl ro� oczr.q � a i i E U F r(N .vro z rr,z 0 w w w w wH z a a a z m zmw wa a Fac�z m a l rn n u W F w w rw w W w a u N N F F N w ac�� Hzo Hzo Hzo z w1O z w� O 3 3 f.Z 6 1 a' FS U J Z a U u a N wN>.z a w W O Z U a E ❑ F ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ F� ❑ a,' Z ❑ rL H ❑rl % ❑ .Z H ❑ a.' z>•a w a E, a s s x H m a h m i o gra a uo ado Now w 3 W W \ c� hoax z O U 5.4 Z U ❑a❑Uva Z Z T 'I, Z w rna[.A W!] Z U m a rn m a �r a 0 o mz o0 oz '� o N w (9 Ft n. t Z a ❑c) a.a I I v > v v o I I W a Y, e a F a s F a w o Y, rc a a s I o O Z O O O O O m H x w �mp r� w il o m w w W w 'OC. I U W F W Y,>� rt: aY, Y ( I. a E, ❑ R1 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ !1 O ❑ O O Z H, w w E 9 >O o14 r-I w a n'o z n. ° p a >+ v v v o v ❑ u v v v w w w w w w W >a d i-]a W W E. a W 1. �� W H n W H W F n W > o 19 2 U Z U Z .> (� < O L > (7 % > U % > W❑❑ 3r n. w oir, z oaz oaz ixz oaf o 'a ooaf Oaf oa �'z O D z 19 u Si a o H x a U O xx coag o � a' o ) '�❑ uom � r I r.i ❑ I-i z z Z I w❑ I W ❑ o W rn aU. z c g o zaC9 a >. >+ a r r F >+ a >, >+ a >+ r ❑ r r H Naz ,aaa c W �, rapt aarc Nay oz,r mu ;ema v ❑ r_) o ❑ ❑ a '3❑ o ❑ ❑ u ❑ ❑ o ❑ ❑ �Ho) w w❑ F U roo z a F❑o o � zaz r.. w W r, a a m wou, O o O O O F'o ;� r'naa r. a a a a a a w t i u U u U u toy� ao a C W F W W W W W W Imo a a❑.] w w a ❑ c� a u ii ci a, 2 j z a o o w m m m m v a F W F>+z o au>:E a a z ,�, % a 0 2 0 a o ❑ E ❑ o ❑ ❑ r, o H o ry [9 Z c9 z c9 Z C9 Z C7 % t7 z �, z ❑ .Y' z ❑ a' z ❑ � z !� rC, % ❑ Q z ❑ rS orim cin 19o a meo a mc� a C� a Ha oma a � o � o s o a o a' � o E, f=] m a F a' ❑❑F o H � o � o _� o W m H ;zoav % z z z �, mUma z z z z ,� ❑a;�c9� Z z z % Z Z cH Z H rn W W W❑ Z z Z :, Z 7. w mN � a n Z on U o z o t) o U U o U U o ❑ n, F z w 'w F � 0 0 FL o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 a w o n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑u w n n,a zI v V I U cn V W a I V V I V I v i v I f+1 K a a s F a [L a s a s a s o f lY a 0 o 0 0 0 < o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 o 0 0 a w , w u, ,n �❑ rl o r F w w w w w w o w w ri w H> 0 0 0 v 0 0 Z z z z 0 Z 7 a a a a z a F ❑ ❑ o ❑ n ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 H F F a a e1 >0 H� ro F a N E W Ei n, rc o a o a o a o a o a o a W ,y a Fr W W W W w w W W fl w O W F a w a w 1 a W a 1.1 3 0 U N T W Z J U' Z, U' Z, U Z > t9 ! J c7 '<', J F c9 C c9 'z. F J U' p❑ W K.3 W O a >O a Z O (L Z O a T O a 'r O (G '<. O a Z O a r O a ! O a F O> 0 a m a U U u>i " R' O Fi !ZG O F K h a0 N a O a u w ❑ o o ❑ z p ❑ 1 .5 ❑ F n, U F F 1 O F W O H [L Z "El o eau zFr arr aa� F o rr a >, .; c s a o z>+ :� a x ❑ u ❑ n u ❑ ❑ u ❑ ❑ V ❑ ❑ a til Z Z Z Z Z Z I Z Z Z wz> o w row oa❑ a a a a W H 3 z 2 Z rL a Ii U tH (H H C7 F E' u ;� z a z w,z s Fu za zE� zH za za F h GL w< 0 0 0 a� H U,4a a a a a n a muz a 0 U W F W W W W W U ❑K O H `3 H a Z H Z 2 'Z. ,ti Z Z .�a❑N �o 0 o u o - o o u o 0 H 5 s a,' 1 4 FC rC 4 Z a U U F W W a Z 7 FJ m 61 W O 0 a Z Z I a F ❑ F ❑ ❑ o ❑ `~ ❑ rC C9 Z U Z l7 Z 17 Z c9 Z >� Zi ❑ rL H a I H a <] 2 a z ❑ FC 1 :e: r1 E T. F[,' F Q,' F 5 < F 5 4 F Ou U n s F 0 3 F P, C F 0 3 F PUi 3 E 0.Ui W 3 W W \ \ :coax z z � U ❑a oU�n Z Z Z Z Z w ozaww❑ Z r ;r, z z u FC F o r W w o z o z o o o 0 7.. W � m � N c fa (hj� o 0 0 o O o 0 o U o v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C7 W E, Z fa J W r F a O 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v o o O 0 ❑U W O w 1 Z m Nn u� �� v v v n v v v a v v v WW a s a s a s a s a s a f a s a s a Y• .1[G O O cJ O C7 O CJ O U O 0 o 0 o O 2 O O O O O O FL v rl �+ .r �., �, m m m N M N ., •� o I. u o Ura rc co a a a a a a a a c� a O J W O O Ur � a 0 F w H w F W '•7 3 H W �+ W J S a w r,F w ra m w w w w w w w r W�a 'fir, Naw wHa wFa aHa raga w � a wHrcwH rwHa wHa WH r ❑ '�o w a a w O fz z o a Z O a Z. O 2 O a O C4 2 O a t •. n, n. n, a a a W n. a a. .� rro i ao •� xh aa,o ❑ oom of z' oHw otic or+ w oH � Fa �r H H 6 � H b i+ ❑ N ' H >� a N >+ a >+ a N oyN �i `� "'a o ❑ o as ❑ U ❑ n U ❑ ❑ on ❑ n,> E'U❑ W Zn ado ''N oa❑ a a a � a w Z 3 � ti rS 4 m %aza a a a a w N ��� � HW❑�i a � a u u a a n w [a O zz .. � •. zrz •� H :%. zz •ti a a as Uo i�c oc oo + uo O m � F F fel W , m n u oa o a c� 1 u W FC 1 <•au Z f+n+ W W x X a U E i Q rt F( L a W O O O O O a H - F ❑ H U C -. H ❑ ft H z H r• a a W r. a a s a .-i r K' [� O U U F m � � W 3 w w 5 m U � ❑a:�c9m z z z z z H Z Z Z rS is U �4 U � ❑ W Z N U o U o Z N H o U U o w u u o00 00 00 ono 00 ., o., oo O Ooo Oo a F W O � r U a O a m, ❑U Cil CJ LL i] � N � U N v 1 V vI v n a s a s .l a O O O O 0 0 O O O O O O >+ h a w z w O z w [.� u u w W w FJ O O 2 O 2i H 2 O O O Z Z u w a a a a a a u a a a u F n, z Z O yr ul F O o 0 0 F N ❑W N j n ! Z C7 � a 2 U W 2 Z tW9 I f+J E a H cel � n,O O a M L+ p d U o U o U U U U V U > E w El W a �laz.m z c9 q❑ `3 ;3 oaoaoZ 'nr Z ' oaz oaz oaz oaz a E W O z I `n a� a�a Rwa � r�r. a aza' aa � aaa o z>+ �„ 7 g r� u ❑ ❑ u ❑ u ❑ q u ❑ ❑ W Z a I I a� . E,u zF zF za za a N ro z F E,a 2❑a� � a a a a a w u u u a a ❑E' O �E Z s U Z a a a o uwE� W a a W u a u E, F W ❑ O Z Z,ti H Z .1 H Z iv Z `L m H Z� a0 a❑ .J U o U o U o LV U c U o m m rn a rn m w of as u u u u um E F Z 2 Z i Z Z z acl U w v1 ul v] ,/1 Ul N Ul Ul a W U H m rn ❑O a t) rs a [1) ra rl [; n � ❑ � ❑ r z ❑ a' H o w ti o a z o o z ❑ a a uU n a `�o � c� a wc� a ma' F� a a' l`so U P W 3 W W >+ <1 I£-I ry N TJ C a N ao 2 ❑Q N ,ti N � �� ro 0 � N o H H u aoa:� z z z z u ❑a b L9 rn Z 7 Z Z ,Z FC aU L Z Z Z f:. U M a ❑ wz H � o � E 1H, U o rCl H o U o U o 2 o U o U W � W U' a F Z W 7 w c> o Z F O a O a a w o 0 0 0 0 v G u w n m a v o a s � n I a: F o i N a O l O O O Z 0 0 a caw m r, N N o N F W W ttl W ul W r Z h 2o o Z> O Z O O O U GI H EH' O a o H W w F a a N a w E w Ew z o W ( w o a z o z ECJ U j O U U En O G a rUi a P]3 o w o a a �N 1 w F u z a n y 2 m E a F O F % S U Z O U w F a Y❑F] U E+E W W W t,] a 7. F F W� Z a U w F] Z D. w wau x X s: r.J a r F z Z>+FC Z F W 1)c) U U.� F, G] S H>+5 3 � 3oax c� �+ muma m oa.�c�m u rL Nc� w wn�wwG U E s w � a> G w z u o w� W J W U o 0 0 o n Q a z of w z H a 0 a a r=1 0 0 ❑v w o a a 2 >+ r N Ua V V il s as O O �nwx w n. �a ti 2 2 V W CY a L ti 7 2 [u F ❑ ❑ 0 ❑J � N 2 .J S i z a a o i rl❑ 3 0 �t. W c� w U ❑% a a w w H w F HOz u� > H 2 Z H v1 i ❑ �H '2 k. W a O> Z � � s U U P O F E ii I F H 4]2 q�' 3 c❑i� J V O a o� 3 2 ro w z a O C O F• � w �n 3 F2i aO 2 a wa a az � ❑H o F,S« w u' o c�z 2 H❑W S rc W a CJ a S F Y U Z a au 3 F >, W[1 tL H cn ❑ c l .] H a t) [ z � c�H� S�nU E+ U❑W ti U O U O F U W W S + m c ,%WW' (]❑F o F ❑ a ❑a�c��n z F' cn CU W W❑ 2 w o F. F• a> � F, ❑ '� �2 F� U U o U ❑ 0 r O O r 0000 000 000 0000 LL LL Q 0 0 r � W Z a WOW 00000 0000 000 000 0000 O Z Uw W Q� Z r r N Lf) O N r V I- r r N r It (n r N -T N N W 0 z zw °Q' a co 000 ('MM (D C) Orr rrN 0000 fl � � Q O O i Q) r N N (0 N r CO (0 r O r O Cl) Cl) r N r O -C N z ❑ r N 0 (n N tom) > LL Or r r Cl) OO r r OOO OOO OOOO V' m o Z LU Z (n (° LL z LL r0rr (0 CO LO rrN OV V rrrM O (O I-- 0 :0 � U (0 > 0W a m W Wa c Z ❑ M Y 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O r O r r C j O Q0 CD > N H Cl) CQ 07 _� U 3 J coj O J 0 N T N a Q U -0 W ❑ Nr0 (00 Ocm) MCl) 000 rM V ONON d0 Q � Qma) aW r ca c a) O � `° qaW � � � .� 0 U }p W ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' m U) -r- aw rn Qzfn ceS0) OOJ i F- W > 0 CD W1 @ o O 0 tr 3 N a m a W Q LJ N(n r r Ln 0) N r I- r r N r T U') r N O r ZQ (d ~ = N Q N M: C F- Q a ~ ❑ N O 0 O � a U a c W O F W J 00NM Lf) N - cl QD rrN Orr rrreM 1� p ,U O) U O O W Q 0 r m a s LL Q N T wZ a ❑ ti ("o 0 ❑ Q a Lo 3 Z J 0 r r O N O O r r O O O r M V O r O r O a o e- O Z Q W r m@ p (D 0F7 = o mN W z cn ai�- m 0 e h a O U ) U J (n 00000 0000 000 000 0000 O mQ 4 Q (n LU h o LL Q s N U � h G 4 Q (D a z_ z_ U H Y H H H Y U) c -Z Q Q U m W W W W W i •� w N Ln W 0 W W +: w CD IL > 0 > > > 0 > °i O m W c i O M oz (D N zn (D � z � Q CD _j O za �Q 0 ¢ m m 0 0 � WZ - o W Z_ H 0 OZ_ H 0 WZ � O W � ZH ►- o c °) O J N J ❑ T_ z0 NW N ❑ ZO N aCzO N wrnZO J N J (D W Qa' ~ Q W a, H Qw ~ Qw ~ Q W of ~ Q CO O w QLL � F- � W a' FW = HO W O W w U) ~ O LL a U } N } N } 04 N } N ti W W 7 W Q o 0 U, U o o r1 d E-� z w ' w E+ U k o 0 0 a p a a w o 0 n a o U z I N U� I V olwx �; w r h a z h z O z z tFL J, a W 7 W F C] d O H F a F q J >0 (9 O a O � D: Z H E W F F L vE"i u�i W N Oa fJ F W o FC 0o vo ai�'�w o a' r z m N o p z m m ipi U rzi o ❑ o u m El a o c F a n z F s o mrz� z N x z W ' - o w o w� o a❑ - U H o° E a F a w a w o a z G U% a p U w F L1 U O r O z 3 p ,E, 1 W W 9 H W W m w w o o n p m x E z U zao mom, pw�n 0. W a U� S z W W O O Fa rL iU+O W , 3 H el- O<E O .a 3 U' •� U o a b(9O z FG.1 U z W cn CL W W❑ z H (� H a [L a W r> >+ n WZ. L / C) C) o 00 .. � } � ow 00 0 § j mW Z w 0 } \ Z \ 2 { y � \ \ � \ \ 2 $ C:) C) c /\ z = ( \ 0 © Q) \ § ¥ LU \ ) o ° 2 zk � / 52 } / cc o � ( LL , c § \ } § 36 W � m \ wiƒ LLI m 7 \ $ � � Im m C) C) c / ( I--< \ G / ry / \ \ 0f t \ 2 % / / $ ƒ uE ) \ z < = 4c � � _ \ U) I � � 0- � \ ofd � 2 w � 00 o f \ / } 25 \ ? / 9 \ / @ Ej § \ 0 04 * E % i = � 2 ] % \ j \ \ \ � / i 0- L zM 0 \ § o � /m § \ w / §} 00 0 § \ j § 0} § \ \ \ k z \ »£ \ § ƒ G2G \ e / / / \ \ \ � � ƒ /- \ o e 3 \ 7 C, 2 % / ( 00 o E / \ ± / 4-- Q) § co oc » � f & \ \ \ ® ƒ f % \ z < < \ o o § / 2 q � ® 0 ° -Q � 0 < w }LU Em § ° ice \ ® \ / ƒ 0 » a w a a N % W W F. u a 0 !l U W O w, I V x V h I V c a I V FV V I aW a s a s K a Z a a s a x a s H O a a s s o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o z z o 0 0 a'C9 W � N N in c� r✓i � O In N � .i J+ U W U U U U Z h h z> z % wE. ❑ ❑ o ❑ a a � a U � N N ❑'' W O c7 W W � 9 W w U U U w W t9 w � � 2 w 2 a o a O a o a o a o H E+ �W aN w wo wu r,Eu W u wu wu wu wu U oa z m Z x U z x U` x J x Z U % c7❑ �N w a z w o z z oaz z a p o a % o a z o a z o a z oar o a z o Liz z E,w r v � Fa �w N Law Lnaa Lna - I H � ° E;ac� xx H7, arr HF, � arH l l `" °'� 3ma % za awa' aaa' aww -iaa ozr -, ❑ ❑ as ❑ uo ❑ a :� ❑ iJ ❑ ❑ NOL" m " ❑Hr u w 14 a❑ Z Z N❑U Sr F rt F. 'I " FE.0 za ZH zF za za b w X u z a a a o uWH r,i ii ii w w a U F F N H F W ❑ O H !�]� 'FZ w a a❑.a zo o zo m m � 3 W W 5 5 w w F,Eai ri N (r i �J t� H I .Ui tHn W W W W w W w F>2 w W � j a 4 I D ❑ F ❑ H ❑ O ❑ > Z ❑ K 2 Q 4 c9 Z U Z Z Z ❑ a H ❑ a zra X19 maE� aaa a ; o aHri as mHa ua o a o U U P 3 H w w \ 3 W W F x � >+ FC FC � ❑4_t F o o .'�i 0.. N '£N �� w �m W o H 5 rnuwa z Z .a U ❑a b c9 Ln Z Z I Z Z ts. a,' l U Z Z Z Z Z rn w w W O Z y-i 'L Z 2 U H F m a m m a> m a ca w m r o W N � C7 Q 6. F 2 f.l F U o 0 0 0 0 0 Q o 0 0 0 0 o c>o 0 o v o 0 0 0 0 a O a ❑u W o � ul I v NN I v I v >, o m v I v v v v I v v v v I 0 11 a C, m a a s o 0 0 o u o 0 0 0 0 n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 >, m Z 'OI, H H u vi a (Ei'".>a, fY > a x a E ❑ n n ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ n ❑ a ❑ a - vz It1� ❑ O )y, O Y, a C4 [L CG Y, CG C4 U, O!C O H W E ��a w�+ w � a � z " � � a ❑ rr, � a ❑ a � a ❑ a ❑ x i w a E w w of w u) lil w W w ra wcr, N r,w wF r. wH r, wF, a wE, rx wFa <<I iia wH � r.AFa wH � wHa U.]2 W Z C7 C]❑ v V a[>:3 W O f1 Z OY. Z O iL Z O f✓. O a Z O fZ Z N <n L.0> Z Q(9 q U U O I W '"!. ,- Z I b ❑ I ❑ Z Z Z z CG E 11 a0 Gl J .,{ O GL❑ a Q,' Q Q Q ❑� m � F Q Ei 1,U CG a a of CG O O a q Z H Z L Z F Z F L F O F a C" f.l Q I r U H❑a� Q� H a w H � Q O C1 a V N t� H F E U ❑H O Zi '3 Z ''. % %.ti 'y Z Z Z v w n:❑i-] in� U o - U O U o U o (J � rn rn a ; moi H u �'1 ❑ �� a �) � u � ua ala z cn o a s a a s P, a a s Z F a rr.uz:� Pw', E ❑ F ❑ ❑ 1 ❑ ❑ >, z ❑ Q ! ❑ Q Z ❑ Q Z fl Q Z ❑ Q F[0 .n cF9 fx C7 K u) H K. H C4 iy� a' O, C4 rL O k' H J Q O Q O fC O U w � C � M U W..A z z 2 Z 2 ' ❑aSC��n z N z z z w u�aww❑ z z z % z o IH, ❑ W 2 O � t V o o U o U o 2 > U o U L / 00 00 00 0000 0 0E z y2 00 00 00 0000 0 � / j mW ij � � / / E \ \ zw 7 \ ) oo C14 04 - - - m = \ \ cl ( 7 » � a o0 00 - � /\ § > ¥ LL co Na co oo � r \ 3 } e �± e � zZ * i ° k w � \ 2 \ /cr _¥ ƒ � _ � oNn o ) ( . & \ iu � i m W \ Ea , � o = » e 2 § / / f2 }00 00 00 ooco o / ( UU� ®/< ) ) }CO/\ n �\ \ \ uas = 2 \ ( ƒ m % g 2 ƒ @ / 7z 42 j \ 8m ' @ < »2 wz o0 7 / / k 0 \ \ 0 5 § 0 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 / § C 2 \ 0a -J @ / } § \ } / � � mm = - m � a � o } \ \ ƒ% \§ 0) \ \ � Lz (n L � � \ / oo < © „ § E » EKoo � a o0 0C) Cl) \\ j w zzz 8mm � § < o E tee { LU Ge3 < n o < ® Z ® / < � � � k [ § r 222 as � � � m I- -U w /} D em & -Q / } C) C) o0 00 C. o m m � } -Z o m o ) % 0 Q) % fy / / fE \ z z @3z w w GZ \ i w w ) § \ % / / /2e ® ° ` 0 - z < ~ /k - 7k ° k \ k f / % ouP Guw Gzw G uze P % « o 2 � j < § < j }0 j \ < < / � O § / ) ƒ 2 ) ƒ / / /\ W < ƒ \ \ \ o » R x \ x » \ 41 (� U W L+ W f.l H a: 0 a n u w o m a Z m I v i v I I x v rV W v c 5 n 2 v I v I n w a s a s a s Io a s oo 0 o H I o a a s a s o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o z z o 0 0 £ w r z ti h h m ' a a{ CC LG I 1 /. O o H fH a o a O a o r✓. O a O oao i, w HW H W Fw Hw Hiw Ha z u m m m m r=I � a W o m H a v o{ I w a H Gla a s W til Z a W C� a 2 f, Z [il H Y, W H W H a W H a W H rG W [ a W N a U a Z m zo O z 2 '> o Z U' Z U' Z O C O n. Z fY, Z CJ a CJ a rn O a Z O a Z C4 b a m U �❑ U U r� I W ❑ I W ❑ I !,1 Z I W Z I W H man, aaw mall mar{ mrY, I u H � b,o macs xx H arr Hm ar Ozal m oan `a ,� ❑ v ❑ ❑ a ¢ � o ❑ ❑ oar � I H 2 U cz7 k {� H H❑V m rt o a rt W m m co Ha a H F,l �2 W � r o tJ W H W {il W fil W C9 a t> H F [ H H w f7 o Z W a a❑.-a zo ;ro zo - ono 0 W w W w m EHE W W H x iwi x x x x #f Z 1 FC h 2 < 1 rt 2 2 Z zau w Hai 2 ' Z f+w Q O a r H au :zi W n 0 o 0 0 a H n E. ❑ H ❑ H ❑ E~ n 7H H z as Haa - a ,i rla .� as 2, '.�DrA mHx mc� a mc� a c� a c� a H m � W W W c o a x r z m u m a z z ❑ao0m z z z z z e a u z z z z z m N W m :J W a a a E� z w NOW N L, a ❑o a� o� �o ❑o 0 0 0� �❑ ❑o ❑ o� o 0 x c u w O n.a FmI v n v v v w arx aI v rr xa r;' a za as av rr, a r, a as a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a u ril m N N �o m U r w rd w u w w m w Z h Z Z ti r� m Z Z Z Z Z U w C4 7. rY, Y, ,ct' fL a C4 C4 L9 tk: C7 fx a i'4 fY, rK a CG rx m LG vZi a F ❑ ❑ o o ❑ ❑ n n ❑ m ❑ a .o. H F o 0 0 Z 3 x x G] ❑r' o � ox an a3 aw a a .z � �I 19 % rcol 2 Z F.w E v] tSil EU m E[/1 Z t N U E-, U E U F W F V w" ' E+ W�a w r,w raFa rilHw wFa wHw raHa w1a wFw wFa wFa Fn; ❑❑ �N arc w oaIn oa' I oa % oit ? o 'a' oris oa`� [C7 J Z n. m o1:Z a U Z o, � Z W � Z p, L� Z w m a Ho aaN F n, E a U ❑ U U t� W Z O E Z ',� ❑ a' a of I I F rno 5 a� H F >. ❑ >. >, r>; >+ � rr. >+ EH ❑ > k-� F H U� ❑E,>, QF y W❑ I,U o O o W O U N O CG❑ .] .] .] -A I a F Z 'vl cFil i >a 14 ry CJ F,❑N� an izyw m m m m m W a a ❑F a F O U w H W W w W W k, ra a❑a m oo o uo - uo 0 ra w w w m m of F F z << ii a ao an a U W F z F a s, w a Z a Z o Z K Z 5 Z O O a OF ❑ OF ❑ O F ❑ F ❑ F ❑ a C7 Z C7 Z C� Z U Z U Z F Z N' a .a] Z a' Z rl a Z ❑a Z n a Z>,a a Fw mco rx moa cocoa '� coa 'a coa o is as � Ha gi; ao, iia 3i� a E, W a a - a ❑❑F oo 2 ti F o L, m U 10 c7 30 a:x Z. Z Z Z '� ❑C4 5 U v� Z Z Z Z % U w c r�d W G]❑ Z % % Z Z U a F F m a - - H aE, mF rnF o v § / 00 00 00 o 0 o 0 \ o .. � 0 � 00 00 00 0000 0 . } ion \ § NOW m � OL § CN 'IT 2 _ a / ® � § zw § \ U) � $ 04 - - - m o } 0 0 a Q \ ( \_ / as o0 CD \ \ z & \ g _ � \ s ¥ LL C) CD C14 C14 00 00 � Cl) } \ Er E � § / � C \ \ � E § / U- � o � n = e = oP » � a & i ry � = m2 / j \ � ° � \ z = P = n . 2 00 00 00 0000 0 / \ 0Zzco < G % a \ \ ) \ i - § wco_j w f » i < -0 ue Na mNo / k \ \ I \ % [ CLiLLJ � \ / ici $ m ) \ \ \ LLJ z > o f \ o © » 2e u = 00 00 00 0000 25 � 7 o �LU % \ } § \ }\ � � % » / mi \ / / §N � � � � � 2 /\ ) \ \ ^ q of 2 ` 22I § \ ^ < \ k 0LD < ° \\ z \� % C) CD NCN 00 00 m 2w < § � 2 \ ofi L < 04 iz 0 � » \ \ w < ® kG j � w 22 ] a = � � = � r \ / \ E § § ƒ &76 § ƒ e ~ & ° 3 ( / uU) o0 00 00 0000 0 # e § � j -Z 10) o i ) ok 0 a) \ \ / Ego \ \ � \ \ L � 2 _ w w 7 , 0 QT \ \ k � 5) \ \ § / \ §/ § k / § /\ / & \ Q @a g o 20 % � , _ g EQ � \ ) \ � \ ¢ /\ ¢ \\ ¢ ] § \\ = oLUof \ UJ ± 7 we7LU _ § / m o ¥ C,4 » x 04 ¥ a I W W Ur o p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p o 0 0 o n � o w f-' 'Z W p .n voi w o 0 z N U a o0 00 0o c.,o 00 oc� „0 00 00 00 00 a 0 a ❑o m o n.a m � U c/1I A V V V V V Y .Y, V V /� V I NW a s a s LY L' o o o a a o o a fY o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n o o ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r F w w w w w w w w w w w 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a a n N ❑ a n ❑ ❑ ❑ Ca ❑ ❑ n ❑ Z v � U' C7 Z a Z 2 " ID 2 a 2 S Lil !N W wwa vo, �aaF zza w >l w a uiHa m W a w wFa wFF wEa v`, uazm YY � z �o z - u z u wFa rza w W a w W w ❑❑ s,o as w zzz oaz o z oaz oizz oaz zzz oar o 'az om ar oie z Lu w E H N ��❑., w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 y 5 a F O NO H I a u u o a o a o i a o u a o D a o ryZ J ❑ Z '.�o E 9 H L Ey aaa O Z>� S� a 3 ❑ V ❑ ❑ U ❑ ❑ U ❑❑ U ❑ ❑ U ❑ ❑ auo N`o' w<it , O� o a❑ a a � a a y w a a a r a a w o c9 W o w o W �z "� aF a u w H Ij w o N o H W F N a a❑a zc> I2, �c� H u'3io 21 c�o IZ-I vv z uo 0 w W W W w W GW Gw H W W W fH, a a ❑ a � fl, � ao Ko au a � �Zao cin. cera ua c�a � w � a a W E�a rn rn a 4 w o 0 o a z o a N ❑ F ❑ F La E ❑ � ❑ ° ❑ 2 a a it U U I E, w z w w 3 ❑ E' o E'a Al \ v 3 O a Y U Z ti N Z U ❑a:�C9 rn Z Z Z Z z Z fn w W W❑ Z Z Z 2 Z Z U � � H W a a> ❑ �"l. �' O N u�i O o O cv O p H U o o Z o U o Z o Z o Z o U W N w U U W F W C' O 11 U W O W a I a W Z Z L (Y, a s a W C4 CG rY C4 a m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m w x >i s.. z. L ❑ w w w E >: 0 0 0 h 0 2 z W F ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ n ❑ ❑ n W ❑ ❑ z - " ❑Z j O a cn a U �Z � I � Z � Z a Z � ! � Z a Z F U W O J VJ Z H H E, W E- � v,y U a ZZOD U` Z c'1❑ �+n n.(� W O CZ Z O Z O a Z o W. Z Z Z Z O a2 O a G O a f O CC Z 0W, z H air m9 mE-�r o 0 o i� a of W' ❑ U U U Z D H a ❑ Z ❑ W Z U H < E-, F<C F ZO Z» s L 3 m a a.B ❑ K 3 ❑ U f1 ❑ U 0 ❑ U :I ❑ y aE� No wza w uJ 0 u a i W H F U m 2� a h W� W C7 c9 U o C9 o U o F� Z❑a�J �n m m m a s a o.z w`� a ❑F L Z W iJ Z W a a a [G U U 41 F W W w w W ❑ao '41Z 111 W arca v - E)o 00 00 00 a 0 il w as F0 El e-, F 14 F � E� FW FW ❑ CC U a U 14 1, a U ¢S U #F Z < S K z m o ID z n U O r. W V W u U i/J c/J W U U E W 7 W W � a U£E f4 L ❑ F ❑ O ❑ N ❑ I ❑ c7 Z t9 Z ID F+ Z H a a CL a r o: .1 CG .] r. cY, a F O r-i GG K' t-i O FL ty O FG O �C C) S' O F \ \ f.l � 3 F N H N N =7 ? � La1 '� � ❑[G Z(�U Z Z Z Z Z H W w W W W❑ I Z 2 Z Z U H o � � ❑ �z o0F 1. U" ou U � w a a F z W z N u a 0 a a W v O o 0 0 ❑u fil O Z N I v V I a s a s a s an, zo 00 00 00 GI x n, a Z 7 O L O O O r-i uJ Z N Z Z Z z 0 E' F z w El W F lea min acwF r,� � a wFa W Ha wHa qQ uo n,�r3w oa � oaz o �z oaz F:, C7 n uum a o i �W ❑ �,a '"s N oFa wwa E L v 0a11 E � a z m ah a_ W FG'U' Z o r1 p 4/ E W a n r1 F o u iEz. a a IUj ❑Ia,O Z Z v' Z ZU v1 I-1 O F >+ f.]W as N u E+U E E E H N H in U1 f:. W w E e a u a u Z K U V w F Z F W a W a U E F a n N fC o H ro H a o v u� g N a g N a E�. w .r. m U W -] U rn ti W W O Z Z U rL F a � C1 W Z LL / - c - oc 000 00 000 0o .. ± Wj § o00 00 000 00 000 0 \ C) LLj LU mW i § � an Cl) Cl) � � � 040 CN Cl) 2 a % E ¥ \ zw 2 \ CO ra v o0o as 04 � a CD ± / \ \ \ \� $ � Nn o00 00 - - N C { { z & \ 2 C/) 2 \ > � LL ooc N (D or X-1 co Ew u � / ` 3 § k \ § CL � (D E § � � � m o � � _ „ § E ry � _ % 2 . > Lw = e of WLUa- ee 2 0222 $ cco 00 000 00 (Z) 9- 0 < U) / % a Cl) U) ± - g L (1) m a_ ) wo C) 00 C) as o00 ' k \ \ { / \ § / \ { \ § i / ® ± ± / t / z ) $ {k ® « ` 0 0 = o00 00 000 00 000 0 � » g1CO Mw ® > ® z � - w = 292 ƒ § / j b \ ° � / \ % CL * y % $ � E� EE � � m mr � � � � a � Nm 2 \ \ § § \ \ / / � co w = = ofcc § \ ƒ / § } ° � © &\ 3 } ° \ t � � a rr � o = � Nr 2 § \ / � cr W < 0 � § 2 o a \ \ \ j \ \ � z ± y � m \ § m C) 00 C:) oco Cl) '0 / \ / ƒ 220 \ z � It {\ \ ° 387 / ( o00 00 000 00 000 0 {\ \ ) < \ { � ) \ { D u = » tEm \ \ / F— U) Cl) m 2m eEt ) z z z Z @ { & ® CD § § j § § ) \ \ 8 ® > > > 2 > / z _ / _ -i N § � � § § ma- k / z - 98 ° i / Sk/ 8 § i/ § ] / CD / : { ® ^ § ¢ 0 ^ ƒ� ^ \ L� ~ ƒ� ^ E /0 < fes \ / § § j ƒ / § / / LLJ UJ § § / } � \ \ \ o ¥ ¥ 04 ¥ 04 » c » CN NOW Appendix E 2035 Background Traffic Level-Of-Service !worksheets HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2035 Background Traffic Weekday PM Peak 1 : SW Park St & OR 99 W 4/8/2015 1*0w -• 'i 4� tlk2 �* t dsMIV :r Lane Configurations 1'1a T1i + If I T if Volume(veh/h) 34 1513 7 20 2393 30 7 3 21 47 3 35 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0> 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.97 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.50 Adj Sat Flow,veh/hlln 1845 1845 1900 1845 1845 1900 1900 1881 1881 1845 1845 1845 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 35 1544 7 20 2442 31 7 3 21 48 3 0 Adj No.of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0,98 0.98 0.98 0,98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0:98 0.98 0,98 Percent Heavy Veh,% 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 3 3 3 Cap,veh/h 143 2942 13 304 2894 37 110 40 106 137 128 109 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.82 0.82 0.02 0.82 0.82 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1757 3578 16 1757 3544 45 957 576 1523 1329 1845 1568 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 35 756 795 20 1205 1268 10 0 21 48 3 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1757 1752 1842 1757 1752 1837 1533 0 1523 1329 1845 1568 Q Serve(g s),s 0.5 18.9 18.9 0.3 56.5 57.3 0.0 0.0 1.8 4.9 0.2 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 0.5 18.9 18.9 0.3 56.5 57.3 0.7 0.0 1.8 5.6 0.2 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.02 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 143 1441 1515 304 1431 1500 150 0 106 137 128 109 V/C Ratio(X) 0.24 0.52 0.52 0.07 0.84 0.85 0.07 0.00 0.20 0.35 0.02 0.00 Avail Cap(c a),veh/h 306 1441 1515 478 1431 1500 228 0 185 206 224 190 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 F pstrearnFilter(l) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 17.8 3.9 3.9 3.2 7.5 7.6 61.0 0.0 61.5 63.6 60.7 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 0.5 1.4 1.3 0.1 6.2 6.0 0.1 0.0 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °!Dile Back0fQ(M65%),veh/ln 0.8 9.6 10.0 0.1 29.2 30.7 0.4 0.0 0.8 18 0.1 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 18.3 5.3 5.2 3.3 13.7 13.7 61.1 0.0 62.0 64.5 60.8 0.0 LnGrp LOS B A A A B B E E E Approach Vol,vehlh 1586 2493 31 51 Approach Delay,s/veh 5.5 13.6 61.764.3 Approach LOS A B E E Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 6.2 1200.1 13.7 7.0 119.3 13.7 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 Max Green Setting(Gmax) s 16.0 94.0 17.0 16.0 94.0 17.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 2.3 20.9 7.6 2.5 59.3 3.8 Green Ext Time(p--c),s 0,0 72.8 0.1 0.0 34.8 0.1 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 11.5 HCM 2010 LOS B H:Iprojfile113755-Leadership Circle Specialty RetaiI1005-TigardlSynchro113755.5-2035_PM-BG.syn Synchro 8- Report PSM Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2035 Background Traffic Weekday PM Peak 1 : SW Park St & OR 99 W 4/8/2015 *40 MON .,, � : . ..� ' va. Lane Configurations T1a t r Volume(vph) 34 1513 7 20 2393 30 7 3 21 47 3 35 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00' 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 At Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd,Flaw(prot) 1752 3502 1752 3497 1808 1542 1723 1845 1527 Flt Permitted 0.03 1.00 0.14 1.00 0.84 1.00 0.75 1.00 1.00 Satd.Flow(perm) 64 3502 264 3497 1577 1542 1362 1845 1527 Peak-hour factor,PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj,Flow(vph) 35 1544 7 20 2442 31 7 3 21 48 3 36 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 34 Lane Group Flow(vph) °35 1551 0 20 2473 0 0 10 1 48 3 2 Confl.Peds.(#/hr) 2 2 3 7 7 3 Confl.Bikes(#/hr) 2 2 Heavy Vehicles(%) 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 1% 1% 1%° 3% 3% 3% Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 4 4 Actuated Green,G(s) 118.9 114.7 116.7 113.6 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 Effective Green,g(s) 118.9 114.7 116.7 113.6 9.2 9.2 92 9.2 9.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.85 0.82 0.83 0.81 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 v Clearance Time(s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension(s) 2.3 4.8 2.3 4.8 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 104 2869 253 2837 103 101 89 121 100 v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 0.44 0.00 c0.71 0.00 v/s Ratio Perm 0.27 "0.06 0.01 0.00 c0.04 0.00 vlc Ratio 0.34 0.54 0.08 0.87 0.10 0.01 0.54 0.02 0.02 Uniform Delay,d1 2`1.4 4.1 2.8 8.5 61.5 61.2 63.3 61.2 61.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.22 1.54 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 1.1 0.7 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.1 Delay(s) 22.5 4.8 3.4 13.5 61.7 61.2 67.5 61.3 61.3 Level of Service C A A B E E E E E Approach Delay(s) 5.2 13.4 61.4 64.7 Approach LCIS A B E E HCM 2000 Control Delay �J11.7 HCM 2000Level of Service` B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.83 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 140.0 Sum of lost time(s) 13♦0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.7% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group H:\projfile\13755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retail\005-Tigard\Synchro\13755.5-2035_PM-BG.syn Synchro 8- Report PSM Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2035 Background Traffic Weekday PM Peak 2: OR 99 W & SW School St 4/8/2015 Int Delay,s/veh 0.2 Vol,veh/h 1 1587 2356 26 1 2 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 1 0 0 1 8 4 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 90 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 Grade,% 0 0 d Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 1619 2404 27 1 2 w Conflicting Flow All 2439 0 0 3237 1224 Stage 1 2425 Stage 2 - - 812 Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 6.84 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5,84 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 3.52 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 190 - 7 171 w� Stage 1 _ 52 _ Stage 2 - 397 Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 190 - - 7 170 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 7 Stage 1 52 Stage 2 - - 392 HCM Control Delay,s 0 0 227.9 HCM LOS F Capacity(veh/h) 190 - - 19 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 - - 0.161 HCM Control Delay(s) 24.1 - 227.9 HCM Lane LOS C - F HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.5 HAprofiile113755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retai11005-Tigard\Synchro113755.5-2035_PM-BG.syn Synchro 8- Report PSM Page 5 HCM 2010 TWSC 2035 Background Traffic Weekday PM Peak 3: SW Garrett St & OR 99 W 4/8/2015 N1 11 . i.....,.....i em i... .o- .. fi� ['..t",. » ..c4" Int Delay,s/veh 0.4 Vol,veh/h 1553 35 27 2374 8 36 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length 150 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - - 0 1 - rade,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2' Mvmt Flow 1585 36 28 2422 8 37 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1620 0 2869 810 Stage 1 - - - - 1603 - Stage 2 - 1266 - Critical Hdwy - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 5.84 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.84 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - 3.52 3.32'' Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 398 - 13 323 Stage 1 - 150 Stage 2 - 229 - Platoon blocked,% - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 398 - 12 323 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 86 Stage 1 150 Stage 2 - - - 213 HCM Control Delay,s 0 0.2 26.1 HCM LOS D Capacity(veh/h) 215 - 398 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.209 = 0,069 HCM Control Delay(s) 26.1 14.7 HCM Lane LOS; D - B - HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.8 - 0.2 - H:\projfile\13755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retail\005-Tigard\Synchro\13755.5-2035_PM-BG.syn Synchro 8- Report PSM Page 7 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2035 Background Traffic Weekday PM Peak 5: SW Walnut St & OR 99 W 4/9/2015 v Lane Configurations Vi 1"1+ if 1+ 1a Volume(veh/h) 227 1312 61 8 1984 47 245 200 2 115 52 120 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.93 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1 W 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1863 1863 1900 1881 1881 1881 1845 1845 1900 1845 1845 1900 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 232 1339 62 8 202448 250 204 2' 117 53 122 Adj No.of Lanes 1 2 0 1 _2 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor; 0.08 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98' 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 Cap,veh/h 229 2261 105 182 1991 880 264 257 3 141 34 78 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.66 0.66 0.01 0.56 0.56 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.08 0.07 0.07 Sat Flow,veh/h 1774 3443 159 1792 3574 1580 1757 1823 18 1757 473 1089 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 232 687 714 8 2024 48 250 0 206 117 0 175 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1833 1792 1787 1580 1757 0 1841 1757 0 1562 Q Serve(g s),s 14.0 30.5 30.7 0.3 78.0 1.3 19.7 0.0 15.2 9.2 0.0 10.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 14:0 30.5 30.7 0.3 78.0 1.3 19.7 0.0 15.2 9.2 0♦0 10,0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.70 Lane Grp;Cap(c),veh/h 229 1162 1203 182 1991 880 264 0 259: 141 © 112 V/C Ratio(X) 1.01 0.59 0.59 0.04 1.02 0.05 0.95 0.00 0.79 0.83 0.00 1.57 Avail Cap(c a),veh/h 229 1162 1203 335 1991 880 264 0 259' 213 0 112 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 :: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1:00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 61.4 13.5 13.5 18.6 31.0 6.7 59.0 0.0 58.2 63.4 0.0 65.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 63..1 2.2 2.2 0.1 24.4 0.1 41.3 0.0 14.8 11.5 0.0 294.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °bile BackOfQ(26165%),vehAn 12.8 15.4 16.2 0.1 44.9 0.6 12.6 0.0 8.8 4.9 0.0 13.4 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 124.6 15.7 15.7 18.6 55.4 6.8 100.2 0.0 73.0 74.9 0.0 359.4 LnGrp LOS F B B B F A F E E F Approach Vol,veh/h 1633 2080 456 292 Approach Delay,s/veh 31.2 54.1 87.9 ! 245.4 Approach LOS C p F _ F , w a ,.,...... ,..:..« «., ., •4: .` .. tip„, .,..,«;,:. Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 5.1 96.9 25.0 14.0 19.0 83.0 15.3 23.7 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 *5 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting(Gmax) s 110 79.0 21.0 10.0 14.0 *78 17.0 14.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 2.3 32.7 21.7 12.0 16.0 80.0 11.2 17.2 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 0.0 27.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 61.7 HCM 2010 LOS E HCM 2010 computationalr in * engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. H:Iprojfile113755-Leadership Circle Specialty RetaiI1005-TigardlSynchro113755.5-2035_PM-BG-2010.syn Synchro 8- Report PSM Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2035 Background Traffic Weekday PM Peak 5: SW Walnut St & OR 99 W 4/9/2015 Lane Configurations tt r Vil 1� Volume(vph) 227 1312 61 8 1984 47 245 200 2 115 52 120 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 40 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00' 1.00 0.98 Flpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I=rt 1.00 11.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd.Flaw(prat) 1770 3504 1787 3574 1472 1752 1841' 1752 1612 Flt Permitted 0.05 1.00 0.11 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd.Flow(perm) 100 3504 199 3574 1472 1752 1841 1752 1612 Peak-hour factor,PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj.Flow(vph) 232 1339 62 8 2024 48 250 204 2 117 53 122 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 2 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 59 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 232 1399 0 8 2024 26 250 206 0 117 116 0 Confl.Peds.(#/hr) 13 12 12 13 7 11 11 7 Confl.Bikes(#/hr) 1 3 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3%° 3% 3% 3% Tum Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm Prot.. NA Prot NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 6 Actuated Green,G(s) 91.9 90.9 74.8 74.8 74.8 20.9 17.5 13.5 10.1 Effective Green,g(s) 91.9 90.9 74.8 74.8 74.8 20.9' 17.5 13..5 10.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.66 0.65 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.15 0.12 0.10 0.07 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension(s) 2.3 4.8 2.3 4.8 4.8 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 Lane Grp Cap(uph) 270 2275 118 1909 786 261 230 168 116 v/s Ratio Prot c0.11 0.40 0.00 c0.57 c0.14 c0.11 0.07 0.07 v/s Ratio Perm 0.46 0.04 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.86 0.62 0.07 1.06 0.03 0.96 0.90 0.70 1.00 Uniform Delay,d1 56.1 14.3 19.2 32.6 `' 15.5'` 59.1' 60.4 61.3 64.9 Progression Factor 0.93 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 20.2 1.1 0.1 38.7 0.1 43.6' 32.4 14.5 82.0 Delay(s) 72.3 11.9 19.4 71.3 15.5 102.7 92.7 71.7 146.9 Level of Service E B B E B F F E F Approach Delay(s) 20.5 69.8 98.2 116.8 Approach LOS C E F F HCM 2000 Control Delay 57.7 NCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.02 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 140.0 Sum of lost time(s), 17.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 107.2% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group H:lprojfile113755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retail1005-TigardlSynchro113755.5-2035_PM-BG.syn Synchro 8- Report PSM Page 1 11*4 + Appendix F Pass-by and Primary Trip assignments for the C-G Zoning Development Scenario H:Iprojfile113755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retai11005-TigardlDWGslFigsll3755.05 figs2.l.dwg Jul 15,2015-1l.21am-pmamell Layout Tab:Fl kc IU\ 1 PASS-BY TRIPS PRIMARY TRIPS o O r o N n0 °w � Z D 4 m 90 cn p m z :o (A m m 2 (� „ N 7 Z 0 Cf) a > u zN 9 z0 � I cn 630 > A nN MS r -im f Sd � --i �2SCD Cf) m m �g -11 r� s, ti l�ti �• `•la MS \ Sys a�� cb NO �aY z ) z z X > D D D z 0 . cn �l � mU) y \ D U (n Z >>�y V-16 >� � z M vmcn - 0o>Z Ocz zm-1 e o wr' Appendix G 2035 Total Traffic Level- Of-Service Worksheets Under the Existing R-12 Zoning HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2035 R-12 Zone - Weekday PM Peak Hour 1 : SW Park St & OR 99 W 4/9/2015 Noma MINOR i � c , Lane Configurations I Vi f Volume(veh/h) 34 1522 7 20 2399 30 7 3 21 47 3 35 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 140 1.00 1.00 1.00 140 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1845 1845 1900 1845 1845 1900 1900 1845 1845 1881 1881 1881 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 35 1053 7 20 2448 31 7 3 21 48 3 0 Adj No.of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 Cap,veh/h 150 3005 14 312 2956 37 92 32 81 116 97 83 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.84 0.84 0.02 0.83 0.83 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.00 SatFlow,veh/h 1757 3578 16 1757 3544 45 930 614 1568 1398 1881 1599 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 35 760 800 20 1208 1271 10 0 21 48 3 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/hAn 1757 1752 1842 1757 1752 1837 1544 0 1568 1395 1881 1599 Q Serve(g_s),s 0.4 17.2 17.2 0.2 51.5 52.2 0.0 0.0 1.8 4.8 0.2 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g-c),s 0.4 17.2 17.2 0.2 51.5 52.2 0.7 0.0 1.8 5.5 0.2 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.02 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 150 1472 1547 312 1462 1532 124 0 81 116 97 83 V/C Ratio(X) 0.23 0.52 0.52 0.06 0.83 0.83 0.08 0.00 0.26 0.41 0.03 0.00 A41 Cap(c a),ve /h 313 1472 1547 486 1462 1532 228 0 i 190 214 228 194 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' Upstream Filterp) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 140 1.00 0.00 1,00 1.00' 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 14.7 3.2 3.2 2.6 6.2 6.3 63.3 0.0 63.8 65.9 63.0 0.0 tncr belay(d2),&0 0.5 1.3 1.2 0.1 5.5 5A 0.2 0.0 1.0 1.4 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(26166%),veh/in 0.7 8.6 9.0 0.1 26.4 28.1 0.4 0.0 0.8 1.9 0.1 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 15.2 4.5 4.4 2.7 11.7 11.6 63.5 0.0 64.8 67.3 63.1 0.0 LnGrp LCIS 8 A A A B 8 E E F Approach Vol,veh/h 1595 2499 31 51 Approach Delay,s/veh 4.7 11.6 64.4 67.1 Approach LOS A B E E Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 6.2 122.6 11.2 7.0 121.8 11.2 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 Max Green Setfing,(Gmax),s 16.0 94.0 17.0 16.0 94.0 17.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 2.2 19.2 7.5 2.4 54.2 3.8 Careen Ext Time(p c),s 0.0 74.5 0.1 0,0 39.7 0.1 HCM 2010 CM Belay 10.0 HCM 2010 LOS B H:Iprojfile113755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retai11005-TigardlSynchro113755.5-2035_PM-R-12.syn Synchro 8- Report PSM Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2035 R-12 Zone - Weekday PM Peak Hour 1 : SW Park St & OR 99 W 4/9/2015 MMAW Lane Configurations +T F Volume(vph) 34 1522 7 20 2399 30 7 3 21 47 3 35 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Said.Flow(prot) 1752 3502 1752 3498 1782 1568 1787 1881 1599 Flt Permitted 0.03 1.00 0.14 1.00 0.84 1.00 0.75 1.00 1.00 Satd.Flow(perm) 64 3502 261 3498 1552 1568 1413 1881 1599 Peak-hour factor,PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj.Flow(vph) 35 1553 7 20 2448 31 7 3 21 48 3 36 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 34 Lane Group Flow(vph) 35 1560 0 20 2479 0 0 10 1 48 3 2 Heavy Vehicles(%) 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%° 1% 1% 1% Tum Type p +pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 4 4 Actuated Green,G(s) 119.0 114.8 116.8 113.7 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.1 Effective Green,g(s) 119.0 114.8 116.8 113.7 9.1, 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.85 0.82 0.83 0.81 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension(s) 2.3 4.8 2.3 4.8 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 105 2871 250 2840 100 101 91 122 103 v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 0.45 0.00 c0.71 0.00 wwr v/s Ratio Perm 0.27 0.06 0.01 0.00 c0.03 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.33 0.54 0.08 0.87 0.10 0.01 0.53 0.02 0.02 Uniform Delay,01 21.6 4.1 2.8 8.5 61.6 612 63.4 61.3 61.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.02 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 1.1 0.7 0.0 1.2 0.3 00 3.5 0.0 0.1 Delay(s) 22.6 4.8 2.9 8.4 61.9 61.3 66.9 61.3 61.3 Level of Service; C A A A E E E E E Approach Delay(s) 5.2 8.4 61.5 64.4 Approach LOS A A E E HCM2000Control Delay 81 NCM 2000 Level of Service A HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.83 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 140.0 Sum of lost time(s) 13.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.1% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group H:\projfile\13755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retail\005-Tigard\Synchro\13755.5-2035_PM-R-12.syn Synchro 8- Report PSM Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2035 R-12 Zone - Weekday PM Peak Hour 3: SW Garrett St & OR 99 W 4/9/2015 Int Delay,s/veh 0.8 `III Wk r Vol,veh/h 9 1553 35 27 2374 8 8 0 36 , 5 0 8 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop; Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - None - None - - None Storage Length 50 150 >` Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 Grade,ado 0 - 0 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 Heavy Vehides,% 2 2 2, 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 9 1585 36 28 2422 8 8 0 37 5 0 8 . , Conflicting Flow All 2431 "0 0 1620M 0 0 2887 4107 810 3293 4121 1215 Stage 1 - - - - 1621 1621 - 2482 2482 Stage 2 - - - - 1266 2486, 811 1639 Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.54 5.54 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 2.22 3.62 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 191 - 398 -7 2 323 -3 2 173 Stage 1 - - 107 16030 58 Stage 2 _ - 179 58 _ 339 157 Platoon luted,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 191 398 - -6 2 323 -2 2 173 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 58 32 24 35 Stage 1 - 102 152 _ 29 54 - Stage 2 - - 159 54 286 150 'man ..�,. HCM Control Delay's 0.1 0.2 32.3 98.8 HCMLOS D F Capacity(veh/h) 176 191 398 - 51 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.255 0.048 - 0,069 - - 0,26 HCM Control Delay(s) 32.3 24.8 - 14.7 - - 98.8 HCM Lane LOS D C - B - F HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 1 0.2 0.2 - 0.9 -:Volume exceeds capacity $:Delay exceeds 300s +:Computation Not Defined *:All major volume in platoon H:Iprojfile113755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retai11005-TigardlSynchro113755.5-2035_PM-R-12.syn Synchro 8- Report PSM Page 4 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2035 R-12 Zone - Weekday PM Peak Hour 5: SW Walnut & OR 99 W 41912015 'i 4 *� t mom Lane Configurations 1•f F I Volume(veh/h) 227 1316 61 8 1992 47 245 200 2 115 52 120 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial Q(4b),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 " 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,vehlhlln 1881 1881 1900 1863 1863 1863 1845 1845 1900 1845 1845 1900 Adj FlowRate,veh/h 232 1343 62 8 2033 48 250` 204 2 117 53 122 Adj No.of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0:98 0,98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh,% 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 Cap,veh/h 231 2284 105 181 1972 878 264 257, 3 141 35 81 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.66 0.66 0.01 0.56 0.56 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.08 0.07 0.07 Sat Flow,veh/h 1792 3479 160 1774 3539 1576 1757 1823 18 1757 490 1127 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 232 689 716 8 2033 48 250 0 206 117 0 175 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/in 1792 1787 1852 1774 1770 1576 1757; 0 1841 1757 0 1617 Q Serve(g s),s 14.0 30.2 30.3 0.3 78.0 1.3 19.7 0.0 15.2 9.2 0.0 10.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 14.0 30.2 30.3 0.3 78.0 1.3 19.7 0.0 15.2 92 6.0 10.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.70 Lane Grp Cap(c) veh/h 231 1174 1216 181 1972 878. 264' 0 260 141 0 116 V/C Ratio(X) 1.01 0.59 0.59 0.04 1.03 0.05 0.95 0.00 0.79 0.83 0.00 1.51 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 231 1174 1216 332 1972 878 264 0 260 213 0 116 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00° 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 61.4 13.4 13.5 18.5 31.0 6.7 59.0 0.0 58.2 63.4 0.0 65.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 60.8 2.2 2.1 0.1 28.7 0.1 41.3 0,0 14.8 11.5 0.0 270.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Iaile BackOfQ(-26165°la),veh/In 12.8 15.4 16.0 0.1 45.7 0.6 12.6' 0.0 8S 4.9 0.0 13.2 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 122.3 15.6 15.6 18.6 59.7 6.8 100.2 0.0 72.9 74.9 0.0 335.9 LnGrpr LOS F B B B F A F' E E F Approach Vol,veh/h 1637 2089 456 292 Approach Delay,s/veh 30.7 58.3 87.9 231.3 Approach LOS C E F F Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),''s 5.1 96.9 25.0 14.0 19.0 83.0 153` 23.7 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 *5 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 13.0 79.0 21.0 10.0 14.0 *78; 17.0 14.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+I1),s 2.3 32.3 21.7 12.0 16.0 80.0 11.2 17.2 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 0.0 27.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 r HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 62.5 HCM 2010 LOS E *HCM 2010 computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. H:\projfile\13755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retail\005-Tigard\Synchro\13755.5-2035_PM-R-12.syn Synchro 8- Report PSM Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2035 R-12 Zone - Weekday PM Peak Hour 5: SW Walnut & OR 99 W 4/9/2015 Lane Configurations TA '� �� ►� �, ►f �, Volume(vph) 227 1316 61 8 1992 47 245 200 2115 52 120 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total lost time(s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 40 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fri: 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 : 1.00 0.90 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 SM.Flow(prot) 1787 3544 1770 3539 1515 1752 1842 1752 1627 Fit Permitted 0.05 1.00 0.10 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd.Flow(perm) 101 3544 195 3539 1515 1752 1842 1752 1627 Peak-hour factor,PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj.Flout/(vph) 232 1343 62 8 2033 48 250 204 2 117 53 122 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 2 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 59 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 232 1403 0 8 2033 26 250 206 0' 117 116 0 Confl.Peds.(#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Heavy Vehicles M 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3%': 3% 3% 3% Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 6 Actuated Green,G(s) 91.9 90.9 74.8 74.8 74.8 20.9 17.5 13.5 10.1 Effective Green,g(s) 91.9 90.9 74.8 74.8 74.8 20.9 17.5 13.5 10.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.66 0.65 0.53 0,53 0.53 0.15 0.12 0.10 0.07" Clearance Time(s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension(s) 23 4.8 2.3 4.8 4.8 2,3 2.3 2.3 2.3 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 273 2301 116 1890 809 261 230 168 117 v/s Ratio Prot c0.1'0 0.40 0.00 c0.57 c0.14 c0.11 0.07 0.07 v/s Ratio Perm 0.45 0.04 0.02 We Ratio 0.65 0.61 0.07 1.08 0.03 0.96 0.90 0.76 0.99 Uniform Delay,dl 56.0 14.3 19.3 32.6 15.4 59.1 60.4 61.3 64.9 Progression Factor 0.93 0.76 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 18.7 1.1 0.1 44.4 0.1 43.6 32.4 10.5 78.7 Delay(s) 70.6 11.8 19.4 77.0 15.5 102.7 92.7 71.7 143.6 Level of Service E B B E B F F E F Appmacti[,}eiay(s) 20.2 75.4 98.2 114.8 Approach LOS C E F F x HCM 2000 Control Delay 60.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.03 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 140.0 Sum of lost time(s) 17.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 106.9% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period(min) 15 c' Critical Lane Group H:lprojfile113755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retai11005-TigardlSynchro113755.5-2035_PM-R-12.syn Synchro 8- Report PSM Page 5 Appendix H 2035 Total Traffic Level- Of-Service Worksheets Under the Proposed C-G Zoning HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2035 C-G Zone - Weekday PM Peak Hour 1 : SW Park St & OR 99 W 4/9/2015 Lane Configurations '1 'h1 'l T13 ►i Volume(veh/h) 34 1542 7 20 2418 30 7 3 21 47 3 35 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 : 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1845 1845 1900 1845 1845 1900 1900 1845 1845 1881 1881 1881 Adj Flew Rate,veh/h 35 1573 7 20 2467 31 7 321 48 3 0 Adj No.of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0,98 0,98 0.98 0.98' 0.98 0,98 0♦98 0;98 Percent Heavy Veh,% 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 Cap,veh/h 147 3006 13 307 2957 37 92 32 81 110 97 83 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.84 0.84 0.02 0.83 0.83 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.00 Sat Flow,veh/h 1757 3578 16 1757 3545 44 930 ` 614 1568 1395 1881 1599 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 35 770 810 20 1217 1281 10 0 21 48 3 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1757 1752 1842 1757 1752 1837 1544 0 1568 1395 1881 1599 Q Serve(g_s),s 0.4 17.6 17.6 0.2 52.8 53.5 0.0 0.0 1.8 4.8 0.2 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 0A 17.6 17.6 0.2 52.8 53.5 0.7 0.0 1.8 5.5 0:2 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.02 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 147 1472 1547 307 1462 1532 124 0' 81 116 07 83 V/C Ratio(X) 0.24 0.52 0.52 0.07 0.83 0.84 0.08 0.00 0.26 0.41 0.03 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 311 1472 1547 480 1462 1532 228 0 190 214 228 194 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(])', 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0,00 1.00 1 A 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 15.5 3.2 3.2 2.7 6.3 6.4 63.3 0.0 63.8 65.9 63.0 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),slveh 0.5 1.3 1.3 0.1 5.7 5.6 0.2 0.0 1.0 1.4 01 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °bile BackOfQ(-26165%),vehiln 0,7 8.9 9.3 0A 27.0 28.7 0.4 0.0 0.8 1.9 01 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 16.0 4.5 4.5 2.7 12.0 11.9 63.5 0.0 64.8 67.3 63.1 0.0 LnGrp LOS 8 A A A B B E E' E E Approach Vol,veh/h 1615 2518 31 51 Approach Delay,s/veh 4.8 11.9 64.4 67.1 Approach LOS A g E E stip . , . .. ,. t �ta . ..... _.,tip. � Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 6.2 122.6 11.2 7.0 121.8 11.2 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 16.0 94.0 17.0 16.0 94.0 17.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+I1),s 2.2 19.6 7.5 2.4 55.5 3.8 Green Ext Time(p--c),s 0'„0 74.1 0.1 0.0 38.4 0.1 g. m a' HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 10.2 HCM 2010 LOS g H:Iprojfile113755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retai11005-Tigar6Synchro113755.5-2035_PM-C-G.syn Synchro 8- Report PSM Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2035 C-G Zone - Weekday PM Peak Hour 1 : SW Park St & OR 99 W 4/912015 t T a , ,:.,�, ,...... Lane Configurations T1a Volume(vph) "34 1542 7 20 2418 30 7 321 47 3 35 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 40 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd.Flow(prot) 1752 3503 1752 3498 1782 1568 1787 1881 1599 Flt Permitted 0.03 1.00 0.14 1.00 0.84 1.00 0.75 1.00 1.00 Satd Flow(perm) 64 3503 255 3498 1552 1568 1413 1881 1599 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj.Flow(vph) 35 1573 7 20 2467 31 7 3' 21 48 3 36 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 34 Lane Group Flow(vph) 35 1580 0 20 2498 0 0'' 10 1 48 3 2 Heavy Vehicles(%) 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%° 1% 1% 1% Tum Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 4 4 Actuated Green,G(s) 119.0 114.8 116.8 113.7 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.1 Effective Green,g(s) 119.0 114.8 116.8 113.7 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.85 0.82 0.83 0.81 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension(s) 2.3 4.8 2.3 4.8 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 105 2872 245 2840 100 101 91 122 103 IWO v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 0.45 0.00 c0.71 0.00 v/s Ratio Perm 0.27 0,07 0.01 0.00 c0.03 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.33 0.55 0.08 0.88 0.10 0.01 0.53 0.02 0.02 Uniform Delay,d1 22.5 4.1 2.9 8.6 61.6 61.2 63.4 61.3 61.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.01 0.81 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 1.1 0.8 0.0 ' 1.4 0.3 00 3.5 0.0 0.1 Delay(s) 23.6 4.9 2.9 8.4 61.9 61.3 66.9 61.3 61.3 Level of Service C A A A E E E E E Approach Delay(s) 5.3 8.4 61.5 64.4 Approach LOS A A E E .. ...: "i..H w few,R.4I'. .' ,.... 9•°• +` t sF�N,r HCM 2000 Control Delay 8.7 HCM 2000,Level of Service' A HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.84 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 140.0 Sum of lost time(s) 13.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.6% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group H:\projfile\13755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retail\005-Tigard\Synchro\13755.5-2035_PM-C-G.syn Synchro 8- Report PSM Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2035 C-G Zone - Weekday PM Peak Hour 3: SW Garrett St & OR 99 W 4/9/2015 Int Delay,s/veh 28.3 lwffiw y: N Kill" °rani , . Vol,veh/h 56 1526 35 27 2352 46 8 0 36 47 0 47 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - None Storage Length 50 - 150 Veh in Median Storage,# p p Grade,0/o0 - 0 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 57 1557 36 28 2400 47 8 0 37 48 0 48 I NOW Conflicting Flow All 2447 0 0- 1593 0 0 2944 4191 796 = 3372 4186 1223 Stage - - 1689 1689 2479 2479 Stage 2 - - 1255 2502 893 1707 Critical Hdwy 4.14 - 4.14 - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54' 6.54 5,54 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 2,22 3.52 4,02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 188 408 -7 2 330 -3 2 171 Stage 1 - - 97 148 - -30 58 Stage 2 - - 182 57. 303 145 - Platoon blackedA - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 188 - 408 -4 1 330 -2 1 171 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 32 --4 -17 29 Stage 1 68 103 - -21 54 - Stage 2 - 122 53 - 188 101 N. HCM Control Delay,s 1.1 0.2 50.2 $ 1211.8 HCM LOS F F Capacity(veh/h) 123 188 408 - - 31 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.365 0.304 - 0.068 - 3,094 HCM Control Delay(s) 50.2 32.3 - 14.5 - $1211.8 HCM Lam,LOS F D B - F HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 1.5 1.2 0.2 - - 11.3 mmm -:Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +:Computation Not Defined E *:All major volume in platoon H:Iprojfile113755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retai11005-TigardlSynchro113755.5-2035_PM-C-G.syn Synchro 8- Report PSM Page 4 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2035 C-G Zone - Weekday PM Peak Hour 5: SW Walnut & OR 99 W 41912015 'A � Lane Configurations '� tT r 1+ Volume(veh1h) 233 1319 68 8 1992 47 ' 253 200 2 115 52 128 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1;00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1881 1881 1900 1863 1863 1863 1845 1845 1900 1845 1845 1900 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 238 1346 69 8 2033 48 258 204 2 117 53 131' Adj No.of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0,98 0.98 0,98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh,% 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 Cap,veh/h 231 2272 116 179 1972 878 264 257 3 141 33 82 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.66 0.66 0.01 0.56 0.56 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.08 0.07 0.07 Sat Flow,veh/h 1792 3459 177 1774 3539 1576 1757 1823 18 1757 455 1148 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 238 694 721 8 2033 48 258 0 206 117 0 184 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/hlln 1792 1787 1849 1774 1770 1576 1757 0 1841 1757 0 1613 Q Serve(g_s),s 14.0 30.5 30.7 0.3 78.0 1.3 20.5 0.0 15.2 9.2 0.0 10.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 14.0 30.5 30.7 " 0.3 78.0 1.3 20.5 0.0 15.2 92 0.0 10.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.71 Lane Grp Cap(c) veh/h 231 1174 1214 179 1972 878 264 0 260 141 0 115 V/C Ratio(X) 1.03 0.59 0.59 0.04 1.03 0.05 0.98 0.00 0.79 0.83 0.00 1.60 Avail Cap(c a),veh/h 231 1174 1214 330 1972 878 264 0 260 213 0 115 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 61.4 13.5 13.5 18.6 31.0 6.7 59.3 0.0 58.2 63.4 0.0 65.0 tncr Delay(d2),slveh 67.9 2.2 2.1 0.1 28.7 0.1 49.3' 0.0 14.8 11.5 0.0 305.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °bile BackOfQ(-26165%),veh/In 13.3 15.8 16.3 0.1 45.7 0.6 13.6 0.0 8.8 4.9 0.0 14.2 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 129.4 15.7 15.7 18.7 59.7 6.8 108.6 0.0 72.9 74.9 0.0 370.4 LnGrp LOS F B B B F A F E E F Approach Vol,veh/h 1653 2089 464 301 Approach Delay,,s/veh 32.0 58.3 92.8 255.6 Approach LOS C E F F Assigned �., .,.. •,t. .. d Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 5.1 96.9 25.0 14.0 19.0 83.0 15.3 23.7 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 *5 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 13.0 79.0 21.0 10.0 14.0 *78 17.0 14.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+ll),s 2.3 32.7 22.5 12.0 16.0 80.0 11.2 17.2 Green Ext Time(p_c),s, 0.0 27.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 w, y �v HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 65.4 HCM 2010 LOS E *HCM 2010 computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. H:\projfile\13755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retail\005-Tigard\Synchro\13755.5-2035_PM-C-G-2010.syn Synchro 8- Report PSM Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2035 C-G Zone - Weekday PM Peak Hour 5: SW Walnut & OR 99 W 4/9/2015 Lane Configurations T1 �� �, ►t Volume(vph) 233 1319 68 8 1992 47 -- 253 200 2 115 52 128 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 40 4.0 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes; 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.89 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd.Flow(prot) 1787 3541 1770 3539 1515 1752 1842 1752 1622 Flt Permitted 0.05 1.00 0.10 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd.Flow(perm) 101 3541 191 3539 1515 1752 1842 1752 1622 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj.Flow(vph) 238 1346 69 8 2033 48 258 204 2 117 53 131 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 2 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 63 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 238 1413 0 8 2033 26 258 206 0 117 121 0 Confl.Peds.(#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% I% 2°lo- 2% 2% 376 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 6 Actuated green,G(s) 91.9 90.9 74.8 74.8 74.8 21.7 17.5 13.5 93 Effective Green,g(s) 91.9 90.9 74.8 74.8 74.8 21.7 17.5 13.5 9.3 Actuated /C Ratio 0.66 0.65 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.15 0.12 0.10 0.07 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 l eNde Extension(s) 2.3 4.8 2.3 4.8 4.8 2.3 2.3 23 2.3 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 273 2299 114 1890 809 271 230 168 107 v/s Ratio Prot c0.11 0,40 0.00 c0.57 c0.15 ct1.11 0.07 0,07 v/s Ratio Perm 0.47 0.04 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.87 0.61 0.07 1.08 0.03 0.95 0.90 0.70 1.13 Uniform Delay,d1 56.2 14.3 19.4 32.6 15.4 58.6 60.4 61.3 65.3 Progression Factor 0.03 0.76 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 22.3 1.1 0.2 44.4 0.1 41.4 32.4 10.5 125.0 Delay(s) 74:5 12.0 19.5 77.0 15.5 100.0 92.7 711 190.4 Level of Service E B B E B F F E F Approach Delay(s) 21.0 75.496.8 144.3 Approach LOS C E _ F F Arn. ...nq. HCM 2000 Control Delay 62.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2004 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.03 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 140.0 Sum of lost time(s) 17.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 108.1% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group H:Iprojfile113755-Leadership Circle Specialty RetaiI1005-TigardlSynchro113755.5-2035_PM-C-G.syn Synchro 8- Report PSM Page 1 Appendix I Mitigation Concept .1ep -1 Aq ou J-p ti LO LIq ou"'qs M CZZL6 �10 '(RJVOU C) AMH 011.108d AAS 9Z C Lo L�191 D s u CL ocr 01MOA u 0111f.011 Al��dl33dS > Fo .�Fl M jp;j..qs de O w w Z =I . .. EK z- z z0 Fr z U m L) 0 10 "1 00 0 Z. 0 Z. R 21 Lo 0 0L, 0 x C, 0 15 =00 o Lu Lu -4 0 Z� L) u ----------- T7 L+J— Is U- 0 OL CL c? SW GARRETT M = 0 STREET L) LLJ C<z L (/)0 z z a A 0 lei o 0 ............. �' w � A �7C 18�w Lz ................. 7n k7� Lo '.A 0 Al ............................ Appendix J Mitigated 2035 Total Traffic Level-®f-Service Worksheets Under the Proposed C-G Zoning HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2035 - C-G Zone Mit - Weekday PM Peak Hour 1 : SW Park St & OR 99 W 4/9/2015 r N Lane Configurations g T1a1a Volume(veh/h) 34 1542 7 20 2418 30 7 3 21 90 °3 35 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 X 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1845 1845 1900 1845 1845 1900 1900 1845 1845 1881 1881 1881 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 35 1573 7 20 2467 31 7 3 2192 3 0 Adj No.of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0,98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 Cap,veh/h 133 2889 13 288 2842 36 126 47 132 162 159 135 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.81 0.81 0.02 0.80 0.80 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.00 Sat Flow,:veh/h 1757 3578 16 1757 3545 44 977 552 1568 1395 1881 1599 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 35 770 810 20 1217 1281 10 0 21 92 3 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/in 1757 1752 1842 1757 1752 1837 1529 0 1568 1395 1881 1599 Q Serve(g_s),s 0.5 21.1 21.2 0.3 63.1 64.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 9.1 0.2 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 0.5 21.1 21.2 0.3 63.1 64.0 0.7 0.0 ` 1.7 9.8 02 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.02 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp;Cap(c),veh/h 133 1415 1487 288 1405 1472 173 0 132. 162 459 135 V/C Ratio(X) 0.26 0.54 0.54 0.07 0.87 0.87 0.06 0.00 0.16 0.57 0.02 0.00 Avail Cap(c a),veh/h 297 1415 1487 462 1405 1472 228 0 190' 214 228 194 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 A 0.00 1.00` 1.00 1.00 0.40 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 22.3 4.6 4.6 3.9 9.0 9.1 59.0 0.0 59.5 63.5 58.8 0.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 0.6 1.5 1.4 0.1 7.4 7.3 0.1 0.0- 0.3' 1.9 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °!Dile BackOfQ(-26165%),veh/in 0.9 10.6 11.2 0.1 32.6 34.6 0.4 0.0 0.8 3.6 01 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 22.9 6.1 6.1 4.0 16.4 16.4 59.1 0.0 59.8 65.4 58.8 0.0 LnGrp LOS C A A A B B E E E E Approach Vol,veh/h 1615 2518 31 95 Approach Delay,s/veh 6.5 16.3; 59.665.2 Approach LOS A B E E MEW tom. 4 , �1111T!111'�i � , Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 6.2 118.0 15.8 7.0 117.2 15.8: Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 Max Green Setting(Gmax) s 16.0 94.0 17.0 16.0 94.0 17.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+l l) s 2.3 23.2 11.8 2.5 66.0 3.7 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 0.0 70.5 0.1 0.0 27.9 0.2 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 14.0 HCM 2010 LOS B H:lprojfile113755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retai11005-TigardlSynchro113755.5-2035_PM-C-G-MIT.syn Synchro 8- Report PSM Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2035 - C-G Zone Mit - Weekday PM Peak Hour 1 : SW Park St & OR 99 W 4/9/2015 Lane Configurations t r Volume(vph) 34 1542 7 20 2418 30 7 3 21 90 3 35 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 40 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00' 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd.Flow(prot) 1752 3503 "1752 3498 1782 1568 1787 1881 1599 Flt Permitted 0.04 1.00 0.13 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.75 1.00 1.00 Satd Flaw(perm) 67 3503 244 3498 1605 1568 1413 1881 1599 Peak-hour factor,PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj.Flow(vph) 35 1573 7 20 2467 31 7' 3 21 92 3 36 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 33 Lane Group Flow(vph) 35 1580 0 20 2498 0 0', 10 2 92 3 3 Heavy Vehicles(%) 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 1% 1% 1% Tum Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm' NA Perm Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 4 4 Actuated Green,G(s) 115.0 110.7 112.6 109.5 13.2 13.2 13.2 13.2 13.2 Effective Green,g(s) 115.0 110.7 112.6 109.5 13.2 13.2 13.2 13.2 13.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.82 0.79 0.80 0.78 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension(s) 2.3 4.8 2.3 4.8 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 106 2769 229 2735 151 147 133 177 150 v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 0.45 0.00 c0.71 0.00 vis Ratio Perm 0.26 0.07 0.01 0.00 c0.07 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.33 0.57 0.09 0.91 0.07 0.01 0.69 0.02 0.02 Uniform Delay,d1 28.4 5.6 4.1 11.6 57.8 57.5 61.4 57.5 57.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 1.1 0.9 0.0 2.2 0.1 0.0 12.7 0.0 0.0 Delay(s) 29.5 6.4 4.0 10.4 57.9 57.5 74.2 57.5 57.6 Level of Service: C A A B F E E E E Approach Delay(s) 6.9 10.3 57.6 69.2 Approach LOS A B E E HCM 2000 Control Delay 11.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.87 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 140.0 Sum of lost time(s) 110 Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.6% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group H:\projfile\13755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retail\005-Tigard\Synchro\13755.5-2035_PM-C-G-MIT.syn Synchro 8- Report PSM Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2035 - C-G Zone Mit - Weekday PM Peak Hour 2: OR 99 W & SW School Street 4/9/2015 Int Delay,s/veh 0.6 � � p. , Vol,veh/h 52 1608 2361 33 4 22 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 90 - - 0 Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 0 - Grade,% 0 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 53 1641 2409 34 0 22 Conflicting Flow All 2443 0 - 0 3353 1221 Stage 1 2426 Stage 2 - - - 927 Critical Hdwy 4.14 - 6.84 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 9 - - - 5.84 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 _ Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 3.52 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 189 - - - 6 172 Stage 1 52 - Stage 2 - 346 _ Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 189 - 4 172 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - _ - 4 Stage 1 52 -; Stage 2 - 249 HCM Control Delay,s 1 0 29 HCM LOS Q Capacity(veh/h) 189 - 172G HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.281 - 0.131 HCM Control Delay(s) 31.3 - 29 HCM Lane LOS D - D HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 1.1 - 0.4 H:lprojfile113755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retai11005-TigardlSynchro113755.5-2035_PM-C-G-MIT.syn Synchro 8- Report PSM Page 4 HCM 2010 TWSC 2035 - C-G Zone Mit - Weekday PM Peak Hour 3: SW Garrett St & OR 99 W 4/9/2015 r I Int Delay,s/veh 2.1 Vol,veh/h 1573 35 27 2386 8 36 i Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length 150 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 - Grade,% 0 - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1605 36 28 2435 8 37 1'241 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1641 0 2895 820 Stage 1 - 1623 - Stage 2 - - - 1272 Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 5.84 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 - Follow-up Hdwy - 2.22 3.52 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 391 - 13 318 Stage 1 - - 147 Stage 2 - - - - 227 - Platoon blocked,% - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 391 - 12 318 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 12 Stage 1 - 147 Stage 2 - - 211 HCM Control Delay,s 0 0.2 183.4 HCM LOS F Capacity(veh/h) 56 391 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.802 = 0.07 HCM Control Delay(s) 183.4 - 14.9 - HCM Lane LOS" F - B HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 3.5 - - 0.2 H:\projfile\13755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retail\005-Tigard\Synchro\13755.5-2035_PM-C-G-MIT.syn Synchro 8- Report PSM Page 5 HCM 2010 TWSC 2035 - C-G Zone Mit - Weekday PM Peak Hour 4: OR 99 W & RIRO 4/9/2015 Int Delay,s/veh 0.2 „ .. ' ..ski .�. .. �`. i ^.�,,. �... . .,. k I,..her. °»11 Vol,veh/h "0 1609 2329 44 0 32 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None None Storage Length - - 0 Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 1 - Grade,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 1642 2377 45 0 33 s Conflicting Flow All 2421 0 - 0 4041 1211 Stage 1 2399 Stage 2 - 1642 Critical Hdwy 4.14 - 6.63 6.93 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.83 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - 3.519 3.319 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 193 2 175 r� Stage 1 - - - 55 Stage 2 - - 173 Platoon blocked,% _ Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 193 2 175 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver _ 39 - Stage 1 55 Stage 2 - 173 - HCM Control Delay,s 0 0 30.2 HCM LOS' D; Capacity(veh/h) 193 - - 175 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.187 HCM Control Delay(s) 0 30.2 HCM Lane LDS R D HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.7 H:Iprojfile113755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retai11005-TigardlSynchro113755.5-2035_PM-C-G-MIT.syn Synchro 8- Report PSM Page 6 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2035 - C-G Zone Mit - Weekday PM Peak Hour 5: SW Walnut & OR 99 W 4/9/2015 MW Lane Configurations ` '� 't T+ Volume(veh/h) 234 1319 67 8 1992 47 253 200 2 115 52 128 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00; 1.00 1.00 1,00 1;00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1881 1881 1900 1863 1863 1863 1845 1845 1900 1845 1845 1900 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 239 1346 68 8 2033 48 258" 204 2 117 53 131 Adj No.of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 :. 0.98 0.98 0.980.98 0.98 0.98 0,98 0,98 Percent Heavy Veh,% 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 Cap,veh/h 231 2273 115 179 1972 878 276` 257 "3 141 30 74 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.66 0.66 0.01 0.56 0.56 0.16 0.14 0.14 0.08 0.06 0.06 Sat Flow,veh/h 1792 3462 175 1774 3539 1576 1757 1823 18 1757 464 1146 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 239 694 720 8 2033 48 258 0 206 117 0 184 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1792 1787 1850 `.1774 1770 1576` 1757 0 1841 1757 0 1610 Q Serve(g_s),s 14.0 30.5 30.7 0.3 78.0 1.3 20.3 0.0 15.2 9.2 0.0 9.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 14.0 30.5 30.7 0.3 78.0 1.3 20.3 0.0 15:2 9.2 0.0 90 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.71 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 231 1174 1215 179 1972 878r 276 0 260 141 0 104 V/C Ratio(X) 1.04 0.59 0.59 0.04 1.03 0.05 0.93 0.00 0.79 0.83 0.00 1.78 Avail Cap(c a),veh/h 231 1174 1215 330 1972 878 276 0 260 213 0 104 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1A 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1,00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 61.4 13.5 13.5 18.6 31.0 6.7 58.3 0.0 58.2 63.4 0.0 65.5 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 69.1 2.2 2.1 0.1 28.7 01 36.7 0.0 14.8 11.5 0.0 386.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(-26165%)vehlln 13.3 15.6 16.3 0.1 45.7' 0.6 12.7 0.0 8.8 4.9 0.0 15.1 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 130.6 15.7 15.7 18.6 59.7 6.8 95.0 0.0 72.9 74.9 0.0 451.5 LnGrp LOS F B B B F' A= F E E Approach Vol,veh/h 1653 2089 464 301 Approach Delay,s/veh 32.3 58.3 85.2 305.1 Approach LOS C E F F . r' Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 5.1 96.9 26.0 13.0 19.0 83.0 15.3 23.7 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 "5 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 13.0 79.0 22.0 9.0 14.0 *78 17.0 14.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+I1),s 2.3 32.7 22.3 11.0 16.0 80.0 11.2 17.2 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 0.0 27.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01 0.0 HCM 2010 Ctrl delay 68.0 HCM 2010 LOS E *HCM 2010 computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. H:\projfile\13755-Leadership Circle Specialty Retail\005-Tigard\Synchro\13755.5-2035_PM-C-G-MIT-2010.syn Synchro 8- Report PSM Page 1 NNOMMMOMMMMUMMEMM HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2035 - C-G Zone Mit - Weekday PM Peak Hour 5: SW Walnut & OR 99 W 4/9/2015 Lane Configurations 3 tt r 1+ Volume(vph) 234 1319 67 8 1992 47 253 200 2 115 52 128 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0:99 1.00 1.00 085 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.89 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd.Flow(prot) 1787 3541 1770 3539 1515 1752 1842 : 1752 1622 Flt Permitted 0.05 1.00 0.10 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd.Flour(perm), 101 3541 192 3539 1515 1752 1842 1752 1622 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj.Flow(vph) 239 1346 68 8 2033 48 258 204 2' 117 53 131 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 2 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 63 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 239 1412 0 8 2033 26 258206 0 117 121 0 Confl.Peds.(#/hr) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Heavy Vehicles{%) 1%° 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 6 Actuated Green,G(s) 91.9 94.9 74.8 74.8 74.8 21.7 17.5 13.5 9.3 Effective Green,g(s) 91.9 90.9 74.8 74.8 74.8 21.7 17.5 13.5 9.3 Actuated 4/C Ratio 0.66 0.t^r5 5.53 0.53 0.53 0.15 012 > 0.10 0.07 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension(s) 23 4.8 2.3 4.8 4.8 23 2.3 2.3 2.3 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 273 2299 114 1890 809 271 230 168 107 v/s Ratio Prot c0.11 0,40 0.00 c0.57 c0.15 c0.11 0.07 0.07 v/s Ratio Perm 0.47 0.04 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.88 0.61 4.07 1.08 0.03 0.95 0.90 0.70 1.13 Uniform Delay,d1 56.3 14.3 19.4 32.6 15.4 58.6 60.4 61.3 65.3 Progression Factor 0.92 0.74 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 Incremental Delay,d2 22.1 1.1 0.2 44.4 0.1 41.4 32.4 10.5 125.0 Delay(s) 73.8 11.7 19.5 77.0 15.5 100.0 92.7 71.7 190.4 Level of Service E B B E B F F E F Approach delay(s) 24.6 75.4 96.8 144.3 Approach LOS C E F F HCM 2000 Control Delay 62.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1,03 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 140.0 Sum of lost time(s) 17.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 108.2% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group H:Iprojfile113755-Leadership Circle Specialty RetaiI1005-Tigar&Synchro113755.5-2035_PM-C-G-MIT.syn Synchro 8- Report PSM Page 7 MAILING / NOTIFICATION RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE jig City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, 0R .97223 In the Matter of the Proposed Annexation of- Land £Land Use File No.: CPA2015-00005,ZON2015-00007 Land Use File Name: Medium Density Residential (R-12) Preservation I, Gary Pagenstecher, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Associate Planner for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I personally posted notice of Public Hearing on the Type III Planting Commission Development Review at the Tigard Public Library,Tigard City Hall and the Tigard Permit Center, a copy of said notice being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the 19`h day of Tanuagy,2016 . Signature of Persian W " Per ormed Posting On the presence of the Notary) STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ss. City of Tigard Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 2- 1 day of CI h n , 20j-(p. OFFICIAL STAMP BETSY ALICIA PLI GIC-ORE i ALICIA NOTARY PUE3LIC-0OREGON MY COMMISSION W WICOMMISSRES MARCH 0942018 NOTARY PU LIC OF OREGON My Commission Expires: 3 [ 0/ // � 1:',Commundc Dor ol"wntALand Use Apphcitio-'03_Admin Uat rials\iffidacite of Mailing\2016\.Affid-t of Ponting-CP.12015-0000-,-X()\21JI 5-00007 C;arc 20160109.doc, 4-4 ° ° �4-1 ° ap 7� SUN ' +, cn CZ Gnu 4-4 4V4 ' v� INCr. M -,-q U .,-A r. 661 V N U a W N4-4 4-4 cn !;�to 00 VQ CLO CZ -75 41 l v ZZQ .= o - r4 0r4 7 O .n 0 UN +-AM (1) 4-4 rl 4-4 O G1 N Q a� p ; ; a 4-4 to 4 4-4V s-+ bJJ a� 4 v ►-n ^ .. 't� V) .-� OO dp' w 4-4 O M O 4-400 o � oo � U acv 4-4 o U N U U �O J �+{ cn U a� z � 5 oo � C5 j k4-4 O a� ^ 4-4 •• 4-4 V 1 4t cn Ln 7 o o y to O UQV45 � o 4-4 COMMUNITY NEWSPAPET(S 6605 SE Lake Road, Portland, OR 97222 PO Box 22109 Portland OR 97269-2109 Phone:503-684-0360 Fax: 503-620-3433 E-mail: legais@commnewspapers.com v ' AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION State of Oregon, County of Washington, SS I, Charlotte Allsop, being the first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Accounting Manager of The Times (serving Tigard, Tualatin & Sherwood), a newspaper of general circulation, published at Tigard, in the aforesaid county and state, as defined by ORS 193.010 and 193.020, that City of Tigard Notice of Public Hearing —CPA2015- 00005; ZON 2015-00007 TTI 2099 A copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for 1 week in the following issue: November 19, 2015 C I tco% 41( ("),uta:�) Charlotte Allsop (Accounting Manager) Subscribed and sworn to before me this November 19, 2015. NOTARY PUBLIC FOR OWEGGOON�Z a� My commission expires Acct#10093001 Attn: Gary Pagenstecher City of Tigard OFFICIAL STAMP 13125 SW Hall Blvd DESIRAE ANN MARGLIN Tigard, OR 97223 NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON g COMMISSION NO.936708 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MARCH 02,2019 Size: 2 x 12" Amount Due: 200.40* *Please remit to address above. M , PUBLIC HEARING ITEM: The following will be considered by the TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION ON MONDAY,DECEMBER 14,2015,AT 7:00 PM AND BEFORE THE TIGARP CITY COUNCIL ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 12, 2 5 AT 7:30 PM at the Tigard Civic Center-Town Hall,13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, Oregon. Public oral or written testimony is invited. The public hearing on this matter will be held under Title 18 and rules of procedure adopted by the Council'and available at City Hall or the rules of procedure set forth in Section 18.390.060.E. The Planning Commission's review is for the purpose of making a recom- mendation to the City Council on the request. The Council will then hold a public hearing on the request prior to making a decision. Further information may be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Division (Staff contact: Gary Pagenstecher) at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223 or by calling 503-718-2434. Medium Density Residential(R-12)Preservation— COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA)2015-00005 Zone Change(ZON)201540007 REQUEST: To adopt a Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment to facilitate preservation of R-12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use. LOCATION: SITE A: 7303 SW Spruce St., 10705 SW 72nd Ave., 10735 SW 72nd Ave; TAX MAP/ LOT #'s: 1 S 136ACO2200, 1 S 136ACO2400, 1 S 136ACO2600; SITE B: 13125 SW Pacific Hwy TAX MAP/ LOT # 2S102CB00200. ZONE: Medium Density Residential (R-12), Professional Commercial(C-P),General Commercial(C-G)APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380.020 and 18.390.060.G; Comprehensive Plan Goals 1,2, 10; Statewide Planning Goals 1,2, 10;and Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Title 1. ... ....... nclwrtr MAP " CPA2015 05 ¢'hE8v' l ZON 2016o0007 x< . 2 AN0 F.,sMcnlul lR-12) W " M t� I > t&TEA � Q _ sl { ry E R1!lM1, I I .:#0 1 _ x w. . VICINITY MAP CPA2W[.IOPY ¢� ZOII909b00001 :/ M,Mum PwW,MY1 Ptt21 PrswMbn SITE 9 R-12 Suhjca SiEr R C, Publish 11/19/2015. TT12099 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING TIGARD I, Gary Pagenstecher,being first duly sworn/affil-m,on oath depose and say that I am an Associate Planner for the City of Tigard,Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: ;Check Appropriate Bo�(s)Below} ® NOTICE OF Public HearinV, FOR: Medium Density Residential (R-12) Preservation CPA2015-00005,ZON2015-00007 ❑ AMENDED NOTICE- ❑ City of Tigard Community Development Director/ Designee ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ® Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council /7)�I�K '�� a r'�-, �s.ey.;;�..fe� r�r` e� -a,; f C,C,.i" �+ '•°~f'd°'}',�`� A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit "A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit "B", and by reference made a part hereof, November 5,2015 , and deposited in the Unite tates Mail on November 5;2015 ,postage prepaid. f, f, aryl agenstec r ;�'� STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the ` day of , 2015. OFFICIAL STAMP BETSY GALICIA NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON Ckj COMMISSION NO.925741 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MARCH 09,2018— NOTARY PUB IC OF OREGON My Commission Expires: 3 / C1 1 I 1:\(1onununity llccclopmmt\land Usc Applications\03_Admin,Nlatcnals\Aftidavits of[vlailii7g\2015\(111.12015-(H)(9)5J' ON2015-00007:Affidavit Gary 20151105.doce ' Ballot measure 56,adopted by the voters in 1998,and codified in ORS 227.186,requires the following language in this notice: This is to notify you that the City of Tigard has proposed a land use regulation that may affect the permissible uses of your property and other properties. NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE,LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, p IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL BE HELD BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON DECEMBER 14, 2015 AT 7:00 PM and THE CITY COUNCIL ON JANUARY 12, 2Q15 AT 7:30 PM. THE PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL BE CONDUCTED IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER AT 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. THESE HEARINGS ARE FOR THE PURPOSE OF RECEIVING TESTIMONY FROM THE PUBLIC. THE CITY HAS DETERMINED THAT ADOPTION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ORDINANCE MAY AFFECT THE PERMISSIBLE USES OF YOUR PROPERTY,AND OTHER PROPERTIES IN THE AFFECTED ZONES,AND MAY CHANGE THE VALUE OF YOUR PROPERTY. Why did I get this notice?: The city is initiating this Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone change to facilitate preservation of R-12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use. You are receiving this notice because you own residential or commercially zoned property that is affected by one or more of the changes described below. FILE NOS.: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) 2015-00005 Zone Change (ZON) 2015-00007 Q FILE TITLE: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R-12) PRESERVATION X UJ APPLICANT: City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: The city is initiating this Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment to facilitate preservation of R-12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use. Two sites (A and B) are in play by the development community that would benefit from the city's coordinating initiative. The City proposes this Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment to change the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning Map Classifications of the subject parcels in SITE A (3 parcels totaling 1.54 acres) from professional commercial district (C-P) to medium density residential (R-12); and change the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning Map Classifications of the subject parcel in SITE B (1 parcel of 1.37 acre) from medium density residential (R-12) to general commercial (C-G). LOCATION: SITE A: 7303 SW Spruce St., 10705 SW 72nd Ave., 10735 SW 72nd Ave; TAX MAP/ LOT #'s: 1S136ACO2200, 1S136ACO2400, 1S136ACO2600;and SITE B: 13125 SW Pacific Hwy TAX MAP/ LOT# 2S102CB00200 COMP PLAN DESIGNATION/ ZONING DISTRICT: Medium Density Residential (R-12), Professional Commercial (C-P), General Commercial (C-G) APPLICABLE Community Development Code Chapters 18.380.020 and 18.390.060.G; Comprehensive Plan REVIEW Goals 1, 2, 10; Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 10; and Metro's Urban Growth Management CRITERIA: Functional Plan Title 1. 1- :f VICINITY MAP uJI < CPA 2015-00005 PINE S T ZON 2015-00007 d Z Medium Residential (R-12) Preservation UJ d SITE A H Subject Site D r SPRUCE a ,1 C-P to R-12(1.54 acres) - R-25 LJ R-4.5 i Information on this map is for general location }� only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. Approx.Scale 1:2,000-1 In=161 It Map printed at 09:19 AM on 05-Nov-15 DATA IS DERIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES.THE CITY OF TIGARD MAKES NO WARRANTY,REPRESENTATION OR GUARANTEE AS TO THE CONTENT ACCURACY,TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY OF THE DATA PROVIDED HEREIN.THE CITY OF TIGARD SHALL ASSUME NO LIARILITY FOR ANY ERRORS,OMISSIONS,OR INACCURACIES IN THE INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDLESS OF HOW CAUSED. !1 h 1 City of Tigard Pmt TIGAR� APS 1Ti Ord,OR 972233125 SW Hall d J g G Q$O --- —._ _ _ M 503 639-4171 k=EMWwww.tigardor.gov LVj iR VICINITY MAP p CPA 2015-00005 �4 ZON 2015-00007 Medium Residential (R-12) Preservation SITE B R-12 Tigard Subject Site D Elcmentary R-12 to C-G(1.37 acres) i O0 T < c R-4.5 +1 Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. Approx.Scale 1:2,000-1 In=161 ft - Map printed at 09:11 AM on 05-Nov-15 DATA IS DERIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES.THE CITY OF TIGARD MAKES NO WARRANTY REPRESENTATION OR GUARANTEE AS TO THE CONTENT.ACCURACY.TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY OF THE DATA PROVIDED HEREIN.THE CITY OF TIGARD SHALL ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS.OMISSIONS,OR INACCURACIES IN THE INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDLESS OF HOW CAUSED. City of Tigard Feet '�k TIGARD APs 13125 SW HallTgard,OR97223d �250 � - 503639171 � 'A . www,tigard-or.gov .r EXHIBIT B City ofTigard City ofTigard Community Development qCommunity Development ' ATTN: Gary Pagenstecher ATTN: Gary Pagenstecher 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard-Tualatin School District Richard & Katherine c/o Kelly Houssaini Topping Miller Nash 19765 Derby St. 6960 SW Sandburg West Linn, OR 97068 Tigard, OR 97223 a AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING 9 w I, Gary Pagenstecher,being first duly sworn/affirm,on oath depose and say that I am an Associate Planner for the City of Tigard,Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: {Check;Appropnatc Boa(,)Below ® NOTICE OF Public Hearing FOR: Medium Density Residential (R-12) Preservation CPA2015-00005,ZON2015-00007 ❑ AMENDED NOTICE— ❑ City of Tigard Community Development Director/ Designee ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ® Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit "A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit "B", and by reference made a part hereof, November 5. 2015 , and deposited in the United States Mail on November 5. 2015 ,postage prepaid. Gary Pagenstecher STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the t' _day of �Joyf", bel' 52015. OFFICIAL STAMP BETSY GALICIA NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.925741 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MARCH 09,2018 NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON My Commission Expires: J( Cl 1 1 Y 1:ACommunihy Dcvelopmcnt\Land Use Applications\03_Admin\latcnals\Affidavits of mailing\2015\(113r\2015-00005_'/.ON2015-00i x)7 Affidavit Gan-20151105.docx " t EXHIBITA NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE,LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS t E, q IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BEFORE THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION ON MONDAY, DECEMBER 14, 20152 AT 7.00 PM, AND BEFORE THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 12, 2015, AT 7.30 PM THE PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL BE CONDUCTED IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER AT 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. THESE HEARINGS ARE FOR THE PURPOSE OF RECEIVING TESTIMONY FROM THE PUBLIC. FILE NOS.: Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) 2015-00005 Zone Change (ZON) 2015-00007 FILE TITLE: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R-12) PRESERVATION APPLICANT: City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: The city is initiating this Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment to facilitate preservation of R-12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use. The City proposes changing the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning Map Classifications of the subject parcels in SITE A (3 parcels totaling 1.54 acres) from professional commercial district (C-P) to medium density residential (R-12); and changing the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning Map Classifications of the subject parcel in SITE B (1 parcel of 1.37 acre) from medium density residential (R-12) to general commercial (C-G). LOCATION: SITE A: 7303 SW Spruce St., 10705 SW 72nd Ave., 10735 SW 72nd Ave; TAX MAP/ LOT #'s: 1S136ACO2200, 1S136ACO2400, 1S136ACO2600; and SITE B: 13125 SW Pacific Hwy TAX MAP/LOT# 2S102CB00200 COMP PLAN DESIGNATION/ ZONING DISTRICT: Medium Density Residential (R-12), Professional Commercial (C-P), General Commercial (C-G) APPLICABLE Community Development Code Chapters 18.380.020 and 18.390.060.G; Comprehensive Plan REVIEW Goals 1, 2, 10; Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 10; and Metro's Urban Growth Management CRITERIA: Functional Plan Title 1. T s THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.390.060.E OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL 503-639-4171, EXT. 2438 (VOICE) OR 503-684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. PUBLIC ORAL OR WRITTEN TESTIMONY IS INVITED. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. THE PURPOSE OF THE PL),NNING COMMISSION'S REVIEW IS TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL. THE COUNCIL WILL THEN HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ITEM AT A LATER DATE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25�) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING,A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25�) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER GARY PAGENSTECHER AT 503-718-2432 TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223) OR BY EMAIL TO aar' ri and-or. ov. • 1_ t, VICINITY MAP UJ > CPA 2015-00005 PINE ST < ZON 2015-00007 Z Medium Residential (R-12) Preservation t.+� 4 n. SITE A l , Subject Site f: n: rte. i - SPRUCE ST �l C-P to R-12(1.54 acres) r T R-25 � R-4.5 a z Information on this map Is for general location h only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. Approx.Scale 1:2,000-1 In=161 it Map printed at 09:19 AM on 05-Nov-15 DATA IS DERIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES.THE CITY OF TIGARD I MAKES NO WARRANTY,REPRESENTATION OR GUARANTEE AS TO THE CONTENT,ACCURACY,TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY OF THE TI DATA PROVIDED HEREIN.THE CITY OF GARO SHALL ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS.OMISSIONS,OR INACCURACIES IN THE INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDLESS OF HOW CAUSED. I City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd O Feet 250 _ _ TIGARMAPS Tigard, 6OR 97123 P. P D) www.tigardor.gov VICINITY MAP 4 Al G-N CPA 2015-00005 ZON 2015-00007 Medium Residential (R-12) Preservation SITE B R-12 Tigard Subject Site O Elementary ,1 R-12 to GG(1.37 acres) — L! j R-4.5 _ u� Information on this map Is for general location only and should be verified with the 'fS Development Services Division. A Approx.Scale 1:2,000-1 In=167 It .A Map printed at 09:11 AM on 05-Nov-15 DATA IS DERIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES.THE CITY OF TIGARD MANES NO WARRANTY REPRESENTATION OR GUARANTEE AS TO THE CONTENT.ACCURACY TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY OF THE DATA PROVIDED HEREIN.THE CITY OF TIGARD SHALL ASSUME NO \`l LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS,OMISSIONS,OR INACCURACIES IN THE INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDLESS OF HOW CAUSED. City of Tigard eet yR D 13125 SW Hall Blvd 0 2so TI�gR MgPs Tigard, 639-41712v3 = ,A,. www.tigard-or.gov EXHIBIT B ALBERTSON,BARRY BEACH,DAYLE D.&EVELYN O. 15445 SW 150TH AVE 11530 SW 72ND AVENUE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 BEILKE,SUSAN BEILSTEIN,ELLEN 11755 SW 114TH PLACE 14630 SW 139TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 BRENNEMAN,HEIDI BUEHNER,GRE.TCHEN 11680 SAY'TIGARD DRIVE PO BOX 230268 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97281 CAFFALL,REX CAROL RENIUD—WACO CPO NEWSLETTER COORD. 13205 SW VILLAGE GLENN OSU EXT. SVC - CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT FACUL`1'Y TIGARD,OR 97223 155 NORTH 1ST AVENUE SUI'TE 200 MS48 HILLSBORO,OR 97124 CITY OF TIGARD CONNERY,STACY ATTN: ????? 12564 SW MAIN STREET 13125 SW HALL BLVD. TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 CRAGHEAD,ALEXANDER DEFILIPPIS,VICTOR 12205 SW HALL BOULEVARD 13892 SW BRAYDON CT TIGARD,OR 97223-6210 TIGARD,OR 97224 ENGVALL,ANN ERDT,DON&DOROTI IY 15461 SW 82 PL 13760 SW 121ST AVENUE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 FOSTER,VANESSA FROUDE,BEVERLY 13085 SW HOWARD DR 12200 SW BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 G ALLUCCI,NAOMI GOODHOUSE,JOHN 11285 Sew'78TH AVENUE. 9345 SW MOUNTAIN VIE`X'LANE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 HAMILTON,LISA CPO 4B VICE CHAIR HARDING,'TODD&HERING JR,BLAKE. 13565 SW BEEF BEND ROAD NORRIS BEGGS&SIMPSON TIGARD,OR 97224 121 SW MORRISON,SUITE 200 PORTLAND,OR 97204 HOGAN,KEVIN HOWLAND,HAROLD AND RUTH 14357 SW 133RD AVENUE 13145 SW BENISH TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 JULIE RUSSELL CHAIR CPO 4B CHAIR JULIE RUSSELL,CPO 4B CHAIR 16200 SW PACIFIC HWY SUITE H BOX 242 12662 SW TERRAVIEW DRIVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 KEERINS,PATRICIA KIMMEL,DAVID 15677 SW OREGON ST.APT 209 1335 SW 66TH SUITE 201 TIGARD,OR 97140 PORTLAND,OR 97225 KNAPP,MOND LONG,JIM CHAIR,CPO 4M 9600 SW FREWING STREET 10730 SW 72ND AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 MILDREN,GENE MURDOCK,NATHAN AND ANN MILDREN DESIGN GROUP 7415 SW SPRUCE STREET 7650 SW BEVELAND ST,STE 120 "TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 NEAL BROWN. GRI NE`s"TH,PATTY MEADOWS INC REALTORS 12180 SW MERESTONE COURT 12655 S`K'NORTH DAKOTA STREET TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 RORMAN, SUE SPRING,BRAD 11250 SW 82ND AVE 7555 SW SPRUCE STREET TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 STALZER,CHARLIE AND LARIE SUNDBERG,ROSS 14781 SW JULIET TERRACE 16382 SW 104TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224 THOMPSON,GLENNA WALSH,DAVID 13676 SW HALL BLVD UNIT 2 10236 SW STUART COURT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 WEGENER,BRIAN 9830 SW KIMBERLY DRIVE TIGARD,OR 97224 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING TIGARD I, Gary Pagenstecher,being first duly sworn/affirm,on oath depose and say that I am an Associate Planner for the City of Tigard,Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: {Check Appropriate Box(s)Beloxv} ® NOTICE OF Pubhc Hearing FOR: Medium Density Residential (R-12) Preservation CPA2015-00005,ZON2015-00007 ❑ AMENDED NOTICE— ❑ City of Tigard Community Development Director/ Designee ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ® Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council g� A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit "A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit "B", and by reference made a part hereof, November 19,2015 ,and depo ' in the United States Mail on November 19.2015 ,postage prepaid. r,, F,.,) Ga Pagenstecher STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmedbefore me on the �F day of DPe_� bz-y— ,2015. OFFICIAL STAMP BETSY GALICIA ;VOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ° COMMISSION NO.925741 < n MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MARCH 09,2018 `'v NOTARY PUBLIC, OREGON My Commission Expires: ol u l:ACommunitt Dccdopmcnt\Land Usc;Applications\13_Admin 5latcrials\Affidavits ofibiailing\2015\Cp:12015-00(H)5_ZON2015-00(07:Af6daNit Gary 20151119.docx EXHIBIT A NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE,LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER- PUBLIC URCHASERPUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING `FILL BE HELD BEFORE THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION ON MONDAY DECEMBER 14 2015 AT 7:00 PM, AND BEFORE THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 12, 2015 AT 7.30 PM THE PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL BE CONDUCTED IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER AT 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. THESE HEARINGS ARE FOR THE PURPOSE OF RECEIVING TESTIMONY FROM THE PUBLIC. FILE NOS.: Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) 2015-00005 Zone Change (ZON) 2015-00007 FILE TITLE: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R-12) PRESERVATION APPLICANT: City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: The city is initiating this Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment to facilitate preservation of R-12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use. The City proposes changing the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning Map Classifications of the subject parcels in SITE A (3 parcels totaling 1.54 acres) from professional commercial district (C-P) to medium density residential (R-12); and changing the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning Map Classifications of the subject parcel in SITE B (1 parcel of 1.37 acre) from medium density residential (R-12) to general commercial (C-G). LOCATION: SITE A: 7303 SW Spruce St., 10705 SW 72nd Ave., 10735 SW 72nd Ave; TAX MAP/ LOT #'s: 1S136ACO2200, 1S136ACO2400, 1S136ACO2500;and SITE B: 13125 SW Pacific Hwy TAX MAP/ LOT#2S102CB00200 COMP PLAN DESIGNATION/ ZONING DISTRICT: Medium Density Residential (R-12),Professional Commercial (C-P), General Commercial (C-G) APPLICABLE Community Development Code Chapters 18.380.020 and 18.390.060.G; Comprehensive Plan REVIEW Goals 1, 2, 10; Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 10; and Metro's Urban Growth Management CRITERIA: Functional Plan Title 1. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.390.060.E OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE. ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL 503-639-4171, EXT. 2438 (VOICE) OR 503-684-2772 ('TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE` SEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. PUBLIC ORAL OR WRITTEN TESTIMONY IS INVITED. ANYONE NVISIIING TO PRESENT WRI'I"FEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL "TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT TIIE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVPTE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY CONTINUETHE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL. INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. THE PURPOSE OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S REVIF'\V IS TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL. THE COUNCIL WILL THEN HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ITEM AT A LATER DATE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABL CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COSI" OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25�) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING,A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25�) PER PAGE,OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF T HE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLLASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER GARY PAGENSTECHER AT 503-718-2432 TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223) OR BY EMAIL TO at ti and-or. ov. VICINITY MAP > CPA 2015-00005 �Z ZON 2015-00007 Medium Residential (R-12) 4 Preservation SITE A Subject Site SPRUCE ST R-25 LU R-4.5 - Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. Approx.Scale 1:2,000-1 in=167 It -- Map printed at 09:19 AM on 05-Nov-15 1 DATA IS DERIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES,THE CITY OF TIGARD MAKES NO WARRANTY,REPRESENTATION OR GUARANTEE AS TO THE CONTENT,ACCURACY,TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY OF THE DATA PROVIDED HEREIN.THE CITY OF TIGARD SHALL ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS,OMISSIONS.OR INACCURACIES IN THE INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDLESS OF HOW CAUSED. ..,.�_Y. . City of Tigard rr:t D 13125 SW Hall Blvd 2`C rlGep�nPs Tigard, OR 9-417123 , 3r � nl^'rlrl www.tigard-or.gov VICINITY MAP C-N AW CPA 2015-00005 ZON 2015-00007 Medium Residential (R-12) Preservation SITE B R-1 2 Tigard � - Subject Site Eler»ent�arg+ F 7 Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the -' Development Services Division. Approx.Scale 1:2,000-1 In=161 It f+.+E Map printed at 09:11 AM on 05-Nov-15 F DATA IS DERIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES.THE CITY OF TIGARD MAKES NO WARRANTY,REPRESENTATION OR GUARANTEE AS TO THE CONTENT,ACCURACY,TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY OF THE DATA PROVIDED HEREIN.THE CIN OF TIGARD SHALL ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS,OMISSIONS OR INACCURACIES IN THE �. INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDLESS OF HOW CAUSED. City of Tigard } p 13125 SW Hall Blvd Fejt ?I�ARMAP5 Tigard,OR 97223 FGj� 503 639-4171 F ! ,» - www.tigard-or.gov ,, Exhibit B 1S136DB01700 multiple:2S102BD02700 to 2S102BD02800 ABBOTI',BRUCE&REBECCA AFTER FIFE,LLC 10850 SW 74TH.AVE 10330 SW TUALATIN RD TIGARD,OR 97223 TUALATIN,OR 97062 2S102C1307300 15136AC04200 ANAEF LLC :ANDREWS,LINDA E BY ANNE FERNANDO GLAWE,CHRISTOPHER A 182401IE 1DOWLARK LN 7130 SW PINE ST I-AKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 TIGARD,OR 97223 15136AC03200 2S102CB03302 ARCHER,RUSSELL-1"TRUST BEERS,ANGELS CATHERINE BOUCHER,JL3RK A 9950 SW FREWING ST 10745 SW 71ST AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136AC00400 2S102CB03500 BESS,BOB G AND EVA JO BETHESDA LUTHERAN CONBIUNITIES IN 10595 SW 71ST.AVE 600 HOFF\LANN DR PORTLAND,OR 97223 W ATERTOWN,WI 53094 15136AC01100 15136AC01701 BOW,LkN,ERIC&DEBRA-1 BRAUNSTEN,SCOTT B&IMEG 1N C 7311 SW PINE ST 7212 SW PINE ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136AC04300 2S102CB03501 BRECKENRIDGE,ROBERT D& BREVIG PROPERTIES LLC KATHRYN A 2662 SW GERALD AVE 7218 SW OAK ST PORTLAND,OR 97201 TIGARD,OR 97223 15136AC04600 1S136CA00100 BROWN,NATHAN\1 BRUCE,LISA 10690 SW 75TH.AVE BRUCE,SCOTI' PORTLAND,OR 97223 7510 SW SPRUCE ST TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136AC00401 2S102BD02201 BURNETT,�l LOUISE&CHARLES CMLET VILLAGE LLC 10565 SW 71ST AVE BY RANDALL REALTY CORP TIGARD,OR 97223 9500 SW BARBUR BLVD,STE 300 PORTLAND,OR 97219 1S136BD03500 2S102CB00300 CHAUSSE,CAROLE L CHUNG,HENRY&COMPANY 10705 SW 75TH BY THO-MSON PROPERTY TAX SERVICES TIGARD,OR 97223 PO BOX 06116 CHICAGO,IL 60606 2S102CB00302 1S136AC01000 CJ GLOBAL,LLC CLARK,PATRICIA I PO BOX 5668 7333 SW PINE ST ALOHA,OR 97006 PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S102CB02400 2S102CB02500 CNL FUNDING 2000-A LP CNL FUNDING 2000-A LP BY GE CAPITAL SOLUTIONS BY JACK IN THE BOX INC PO BOX 961026 9330 BALBOA AVE FORT WORTH,TX 76161 SAN DIEGO,CA 92123 2S102CB03401 2S102C1303402 COATS,ROBERT LEE CONDON,JEFFREY L&OLGA B LEE,�,LABLE INEZ 10025 SAS'GARRETT ST 10045 SW GARRETT ST PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136AC01200 1S136AC00500 CONNOR,PENNY L COOPER,M JOHN&NANCY A 7217 SW PINE ST 10525 SW 71ST AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CB03400 2S102CB03301 CYPRESS CREST APARTMENTS LLC DARROW,DON S PO BOX 15516 9952 SW FREWING ST FRETMONT,CA 94539 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136AC03000 1S136DB01600 DASUE LLC DORRELL,DONAL N 11902 SW 60TI1 10885 SW 74TH ST PORTLAND,OR 97219 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136DB01500 2S102CB00700 DORRELL,DONAL V G&DEL,\L-k R ELSENBACH,CHRISTOPHER P&VICKI PO BOX 230482 A ELSENBACH REV LINT TRUST TIGARD,OR 97281 1238 SW DAVENPORT ST PORTLAND,OR 97201 2S102CB00400 15136AC03300 ELWELL,JOHN A FAKIH,HAIDAR&I-A IA 10230 SW SCHOOL ST 10705 SW 71ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136BD03400 1S136AC03800 FARANCE,RICHARD A FATHERREE,ROBERT&LISA 12534 SW 56TH CT 7302 SW SPRUCE ST PORTLAND,OR 97219 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136ACO2000 2S102BC04350 FENNELLY,JOHN & FINKE,ALEX GRAY,LESLIE 10615 SW 64TH DR 10650 SW 75TH ANTE PORTLAND,OR 97219 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BC04304 1S136BD04000 FINKE,H-kNS-CHRISTIAN CUSTODIAN FOSTER,KYLE FOR FINKS,NICHOLAS A 7595 SW SPRUCE ST PO BOX 1565 TIGARD,OR 97223 WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 1S136AC00800 1S136BD03700 FOX,SARA FRAZIER,GARY B 10490 SW 75TH AVE 7535 SW SPRUCE ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 multiple: 1S136AC03400 to 1S136DB00201 1S136AD03701 FRED MEYER INC GARBER LIVING TRUST STORE#375 10680 SW 71ST AVE 1014 VINE ST PORTLAND,OR 97223 PROPERTY T<-AX 7TH FLOOR CINCINNATI,OH 45202 2S102CB00900 2SI02BC04301 GARGER,JERRY E GEORGESON,THEODORE&KATHERINE 13070 SW GRANT AVE PO BOX 776 TIGARD,OR 97223 SHERWOOD,OR 97140 1S136ACO2900 2S102CB05800 GIBBONS,NOREEN M GNAU,-!\lICI-LA EL F& ANGEL S 10730 SW 72ND AVE 10395 SW GRANT CT PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136BD01000 2S 102BD02400 GO-ITER,SAMUEL A&VICTORIA L 1-LAGER,JOSHUA J 7515 SW PINE ST 12820 SW GRANT AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102C1305700 1S136AC04700 HALSTEAD,ERIK&K-AREN HANSON,CHARLES D&CHRISTINIA D 13045 SW GRANT AVE 10670 SW 75TH AVE TIG-ARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S 102BD02501 1 S 136BD03100 H ATCf-LADOURI AN,WE,NDY D HEDIN,JERRY L&ALBERTA A 12840 SW GRANT.AVE 7560 SW PINE ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CB01200 2S102CB00500 HESS,DAVID A&GAIL K HILCHEN,PAUL&LEANN 13170 SW GRANT.AVE 10250 SW SCHOOL ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIG.ARD,OR 97223 1S136AC04500 2S102CB01600 HOBBEL,SUSAN L HOLCOMBE,RYAN&KATIE 10680 SW 75TH AVT, 10395 SW PARK ST PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2SI02CB06600 1S136AC03100 HOUSING_-AUTHORITY OF HOWARD,DAN L&DIANE M WASHINGTON COUNTY 1311 SNOWDEN RD 111 NE LINCOLN ST#200-L WHITE SALMON,WA 98672 HILLSBORO,OR 97124 2S102C1303101 2S102CB00600 HUDSON PLAZA LLC HUTCHISON,DENNIS E 11795 SW KATHERINE ST 10270 SW SCHOOL ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136 AC03801 multiple:2S102CB02300 to 2S102CB06700 ILLIAS,NICOLE M&KYLE A INLINE PROPERTIES LLC 10820 SW 74TH AVE 13200 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136CA90201 1 S 136BD03300 JACOBSON,KEVIN KAYE,S AUL M 10900 SW 76TH PI,#20 10655 SW 75TI l_AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S102BD02600 2S102CB01700 KI\4,PENNEY KI\MEL,KRISTA L 395 NW SILVER ADO DR 10365 SW PARK STREET BEAVERTON,OR 97006 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136CA90141 1S136BD03200 KOHL'\LAN,KYLE JAMES LANE,jERED 10900 SW 76TH PL#14 7540 SW PINE SI' TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1 S 136: C00200 1 S 136 AC00901 LARSEN,DEAN W TR& LEFEBVRE,LINDA LARSEN,bL-\RGIE C TR MOON,DANIEL J &SARA N 10530 SW 72ND 7411 SW PINE ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136DB02100 1S136 1001400 LEW'IS,BEN AT\11N NOLAN LONGTHORNE,SHARr\LYNN 10970 SW 74TH AVE 10525 SW 72ND AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136DB01900 2SI02CB03200 ,\LAGLEY,P IMELA L NIASSIH LLC 10910 SW 74TH AVE BY PIERROUZ Y ASAVOLL-�N TIGARD,OR 97223 8 BECKET ST 1y-�KE OSV,`EGO,OR 97035 1S136BD00100 1S136DB01400 MCNULTY,BRET B&JESSICA L MEHR1,ARUN 7508 SW OAK ST FLOR,JENNIFER M PORTLAND,OR 97223 10915 SW 74TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136CA90191 1S136DB01800 MENDONSA,TESSIE) NIICKLEY,WILLL1M 10900 SW 76TH PL UNIT 19 10880 SW 74TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 102BD03100 1 S 136CA90151 MIDAS PROPERTIES INC 11ILXT,DEBORAH JO BY 1LARVIN F POER&COMPANY 10900 SW 76TH PL UNIT 15 PO BOX 52427 TIGARD,OR 97223 ATLANTA,GA 30355 1S136CA90091 2S102CB00800 1lILLER,JODI A MIRANDA,PEDRO&SOFIA 10900 SW 76TH PL#9 13115 SW GRANT AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136CA90172 2S102CB07500 11ISKA TRUST 11K EP TIGARD LLC BY 11ISKA,EDWARDS P& 623 5TH AVE, 18TH FLR PHYLLIS A TRS NEW YORK,NY 10022 745 THIRD ST LAKE OSNXTGO,OR 97034 2S 102BD02500 1 S 136A CO2102 MONFARED,FARSHAD F&FARIBA MOREHEAD,RODNEY N 16879 SW KOLDING LN 7383 SW SPRUCE ST BEAVERTON,OR 97007 PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S102CB07600 1S136CA90071 MORTENSEN,TIM&SHANNON X1OTI_AGH,XIEHDI S&ZENAID11 F 13155 SW GRANT AVE 10900 SW 76TH PI,#7 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S136A CO2101 1 S 136DB02000 1NRDOCK ANN B NELSON WEST PROPERTIES LLC 7415 SW SPRUCE ST 12316 NW CORNELL RD TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97229 2S102CB01100 1S136AC00900 O'CONNOR,STEPHEN CASEY ODELL,JEFFREY RAY 13150 SW GRANT ANTE 7417 SW PINE ST TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S102CA01300 2S102CB02100 ORCHARD PARK JARX LLC PACIFIC HWY HOUSE&SHOP LLC 16225 NE EUGENE CT CACH,CHRISTOPHER J PORTLAND,OR 97230 6003 4TH AVE NE SEATTLE,WA 98115 IS136AD04000 1S136DB01200 PACIFIC TERRACE CO1I1\IERCLXL LLC PATELZICK,JOHN J JR&CYNTHIA A BY SMITH,EDITH 11 10975 SW 74TH ANTE 833 NW 170TH DR TIGARD,OR 97223 BEAVERTON,OR 97006 multiple: 1S136BD05400 to 1S136BD05500 2S102CB02000 PETERSEN,OVE&LORX REV LIVING PETTIJOHN,PAUL, 7608 SW PINE ST 18435 SW PACIFIC H\X/I' PORTLAND,OR 97223 TUALATIN,OR 97062 2S102CB03504 15136AC01900 POP AT,KAUSHIK L&BINS S PROVANCHER,KENNETH A& 6783 PASEO SAN LEON STEWART,PENNY L PLEASANTON,CA 97566 7330 SW PINE ST PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S136CA07000 1S136BD03600 PROWITT,NANCY C 2001 REVOCABLE PULSINELLI,CHRISTINE M 809 NOE ST 7515 SW SPRUCE ST SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94114 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136C1A07100 IS136AC00803 RAPPOLD,TROY K RECHT,,\L-1RTH A 1125 SE;AL-1DISON ST#201 10520 SW 75TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97214 PORTLAND,OR 97223 15136<AC03900 IS136C.A90111 RECHTEGER,HEIDI REESOR,LOUIS A 10815 SW 74TH,AVE 10900 SW 76TII PL#11 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 15136AC01300 1 S 136CA06900 RICCIARDI,.ANN L ROUSE,CII_ARLES& 7203 SW PINE ST GENDE,DI ANE iii TIGARD,OR 97223 11916 SW ELE�LliR CT TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136tAC04400 IS1361ACO2800 ROUSE,JEANE1"TE RUSSELL-HARRIS PROPERTY TRUST 10491 SW 72ND AVE 24348 SW BAKER RD PORTLAND,OR 97223 SHERWOOD,OR 97140 2S102CB07700 2SI02BD03200 RUTfIERFORD,SHERYL L, S ANCHEZ,J GUAD ALUPE 13157 SW GRANT AVE Z 3VALA,BLANCA E TIGARD,OR 97223 10000 SW MOLLY CT TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136AC00202 1S136C A90212 SC ACCO,LINDLE F SCHIAEFFER,CAROL DUNE E 10900 SW 76TH PL#21 10500 SW 72ND AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S136BD03000 1S136AD03800 SCHMIDT,DAVID AND SCHOEWE,CAROL A TRUST ANNETTE 10720 SW 71ST AVE 7575 SW SPRUCE STREET PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIG.ARD,OR 97223 2S102BC00900 1S136CA90101 SCHULZE,LLOYD&EVELYN FAMILY T SHOE,\LAKER,KELLEE A BY LLOYD H EVELYN M SCHULZE TRS 10900 SW 76TH PL#10 8780 SW INDIAN HILL LN TIGIARD,OR 97223 BF�AVERTON,OR 97008 1 S 136AC00300 1 S 1361AD03900 SITTEL,BETTY J SMITH,EDIT.A Al REVOCABLE LIVING 10560 SW 72ND.AVE 833 NW 170TH DR PORTLAND,OR 97223 BEAVERTON,OR 97006 2S102CB05000 multiple: 1S136BD03003 to 1S136BD03800 SPEIDEL,BENJAMIN E&CLAIRE P SPRING,LINDA L 20375 SW LYNNLY WAY 7555 SW SPRUCE ST SHERWOOD,OR 97140 PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S102BC04302 1S136AC00701 SPRINGER-GF,ORGESON,KATHERINE STECHER,VERNON C 1R GEORGESON,THEODORE 7350 SW OAK PO BOX 766 TIGARD,OR 97223 SHERWOOD,OR 97140 2S 102CB00303 1 S 136CA90131 SUH LLC SUMINSKI,ADAM D 13165 SW PACIFIC HWY 10900 SW 76TH PL#13 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 9722.3 2S102CB01000 multiple:2S102BC08700 to 2S102CB00200 SWEET,JEFF TIGARD-TUAJ--1TIN SCHOOL. SWEET,LORRAINE DISTRICT 231 13130 SW GRANT AVE 6960 SW SANDBURG ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 multiple: 1S130ACO2200 to 1S136ACO2500 1S136AC01800 TOPPING,RICHARD TRACY,NANCY LOU TRUST KEMP,KATIfERINE 7310 SW PINE ST 19765 DERBY ST PORTLAND,OR 97223 WEST LINN,OR 97068 2S IO2CB03000 2S 102BD03000 TRAIN,ARTHUR& TRUCK TERMINALS INC CLINE,A1ARY E 15965 NW TULLAMORRIE WAY 12990 SW PACIFIC HWY PORTLAND,OR 97229 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136C�A90081 1S136AC01700 VAND11K,CIAROLYN L V ANEK,IVAN 10900 SW 76TII PL#8 7290 SW PINE ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 136ACO2700 1 S 136BD01100 VINCENT,BRADFORD VINS,ALEXANDER 10640 SW 72ND AVE 14315 SEXTON MOUNT AIN DR#1F TIGARD,OR 97223 BEAVERTON,OR 97008 1S136AC00801 1S136AC01600 WAINWRIGHT FAMILY LLC WAKEI,AND,DENNIS S&GAY A 6120 SW HUBER 7210 SW PINE ST PORTLAND,OR 97219 TIGARD,OR 97223 15136AC00902 multiple:2S102CB02600 to 2S102CB03300 WALKER,RODNEY L&P-,MMELA G WALTER,ANGEL--k D 7405 SW PINE ST 2863 RIVERWALK LP PORTLAND,OR 97223 EUGENE,OR 97401 1 S 136A C04100 2S 102CB01901 WATSON,JIB-LIE NOEFLE WEBER COASTAL BELLS LTD PTNRSHP 10655 SW 71ST AVE PO BOX 23408 TIGARD,OR 97223 EUGENE,OR 97402 1S136BD04600 1S136CA90161 WELLER,HANA WINANS,EMILY 7575 SW PINE ST 3111 NE 165TH PL PORTL,XND,OR 97223 VANCOUVER,W1 98682 1S136CA90121 1S136DB01300 \VISCMIEYER,SARAH 'ZSOKA,KENNI:TI-I G 10900 SW 76TH PL#12 NICHOLS-ZSOK.X,TIFFANYE B TIGARD,OR 97223 10945 SW 74TH_AVE PORTL:XND,OR 97223 1S136CA90182 1S136,XC00700 ZV?,IGZNE,BRIAN ZWINGLI,WALTER SCOTT TRUST 10900 SW 76TH PL,UNIT 18 7300 SW OAK ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE • City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW HallBoulevard Tigard, OR 97223 In the Matter of the Proposed Annexation of: Land Use File No.: CPA2015-00005, ZON2015-00007 Land Use File Name: Medium Density Residential (R-12) Preservation I, Gary Pagenstecher, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Associate Planner for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I personally posted notice of Public Hearing on the Type III Planning Commission Development Review at the Tigard Public Libraj-:,Tigard Cit,, Hall and the Tigard Permit Center, a copy of said notice being hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the 3`a day of December,2015 . Signature of Pers P n Who formed Posting jn die p Bence of the Notan) STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ss. City of Tigard Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 2/ day of �,I 20—L(d. STAMP 7SY GALICIA :TA "USLIC-OREGON ` a "wi aSION NO.925741 WC( S MARCH 09,2018 NOTARY PUBLIC PF OREGON My Commission Expires: J! 9 //C' l:\Cotni— t'D',dopman\land L',c Applicanons`�,1 t;_,Admin Alatenal�\.AffidavIt,of N Iailing;,2016A.Affidavit of Po,ting-CP-A2015-0000-5 Y.0\2015 O IoU7 Gari 20151203.JucI 4 c U O 4-4 ct � O 4-4 4-jU 4 0 ct ct O J O ct o V � � � � V '� •.�., �=-� C by � '� ct INCO O � , � oo � Ncn rmact � u 4-4 a .. O O •.--� d- cn Lr) CLMu ct cn 4-4 Zt o j cV Aw x u . (-40-4O oo � o 4-J ° 4 � a°p � � V ° c a OV o op 4 `� ° LO W o � b cn dO- W cq � UO o .0 00 o � N M c� 00 m4-4Ct N O spa brQ C,' 4 ' 'Al ^� \ U u� ¢ 00 u �. . o 711 4-J 7 Q J W o U4-4 P. � _ .. '-� 4-4O 75 ;-4 bJo LID UD UD 0 71 � <� 4-4 o u O C� '� rn '� M NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE,LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENTCODE REQUIRES Tl IAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NO'T'ICE, ■ IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER- PUBLIC URCHASERPUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TIIAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BEFORE TI IE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION ON MONDAY DECEMBER 14 2015 AT 7.00 PM, AND BEFORE THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 12, 2015, AT 7:30 PM. THE PUBLIC HEARINGS WILT. BE CONDUCTED IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER AT 13125 SW HALI. BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. THI-SE HEARINGS ARE FOR TI IE PURPOSE OF RI"'Cl TESTIMONY FROM TI IE PUBLIC. FILE NOS.: Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) 2015-00005 Zone Change (ZON) 2015-00007 FILE TITLE: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R-12) PRESERVATION APPLICANT: City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: The city is initiating this Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment to facilitate preservation of R-12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use. The CM, proposes changing the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning Map Classifications of the subject parcels in SITE A (3 parcels totaling 1.54 acres) from professional commercial district (C-P) to medium density residential (R-12); and changing the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning Map Classifications of the subject parcel in SITE B (1 parcel of 1.37 acre) from medium density residential (R-12) to general commercial (C-G). LOCATION: SITE A: 7303 SW Spruce St., 10705 SW 72nd Ave., 10735 SW 72nd Ave; TAX MAP/ LOT #'s: 1S136ACO2200, 1S136ACO2400, 1S136ACO2500;and SITE B: 13125 SW Pacific Hwy 1'AX MAP/ LOT# 2S102CB00200 COMP PLAN DESIGNATION/ ZONING DISTRICT: Medium Density Residential (R-12),Professional Commercial (C-P), General Commercial (C-G) APPLICABLE Community Development Code Chapters 18.380.020 and 18.390.060.G; Comprehensive Plan REVIEW Goals 1, 2, 10; Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 10; and Metro's Urban Growth Management CRITERIA: Functional Plan Title 1. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.390.060.E OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL.. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL 503-639-4171, EXT. 2438 (VOICE) OR 503-684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. PUBLIC ORAL OR WRITTEN TESTIMONY IS INVITED. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRI'1"TEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE PLANNING COMTIISSION WILL. RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN TIIE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRI'I"T LIN TESTIMONY. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THF. PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. THE PURPOSE OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S RL'VIFIW IS TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL. THE COUNCIL WILL 'THEN HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ITEM AT A LATER DATE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25�) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENTRATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR'TO THT? HEARING,A COPY OF'THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR 'IAXTENTY-FIVE CENTS (25�) PER PAGE,OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THI;REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER GARY PAGENSTECHER AT 503-718-2432 'TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HAIL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223) OR BY EMAIL TO gaUI2@tlaard-or.gov. VICINITY MAP CPA 2015-00005 ZON 2015-00007 Medium Residential (R-12) U.1 Preservation <( SITE A wn Subject Site l _ T r - , SPRUCE ST a' - L_ r Information on this map is for general location k only and should be verified with the .. Development Services Division. Approx.Scale 1:2,000-1 In=16/it Map printed at 09:19 AM on 05-Nov-15 DATA IS DERIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES.THE CITY OF TIGARD MAKES NO WARRANTY,REPRESENTATION OR GUARANTEE AS TO THE CONTENT,ACCURACY.TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY OF THE DATA PROVIDED HEREIN.THE CITY OF TIGARD SHALL ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS,OMISSIONS,OR INACCURACIES IN THE INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDLESS OF HOW CAUSED. A- i City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd FEET E _ TI�gR MAPS Tigard,OR 97223 e ` C C 503 639-4171 www.tigardor.gov VICINITY MAP CPA 2015-00005 ZON 2015-00007 Medium Residential (R-12) Preservation SITE B R-12 acrax Subject Site t 1. y g ` +--( L T-1 10 R-4.5—4. ' Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. Approx.Scale 1:2,000-1 In=16/tt A Map printed at 09:11 AM on 05-Nov-15 Jr DATA IS DERIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES.THE CITY OF TIGARD MAKES NO WARRANTY,REPRESENTATION OR GUARANTEE AS TO THE CONTENT,ACCURACY,TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY OF THE DATA PROVIDED HEREIN.THE CITY OF TIGARD SHALL ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS OMISSIONS,OR INACCURACIES IN THE INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDLESS OF HOW CAUSED. City of Tigard ♦ p 13125 SW Hall Blvd Feet 25D TIGAR MAPS Tigard,OR 97223 ° ,,,.`' 503 639-4171 • or.gov www.tigard Gary Pagenstecher To: LFaxon@CommNewspapers.com Subject: RE: Publication of Notice for CPA2015-00005/ZON2015-00007 Thank you From: LFaxon@CommNewspapers.com [maiIto:LFaxon@Comm Newspapers.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 11:27 AM To: Gary Pagenstecher Subject: RE: Publication of Notice for CPA2015-00005/ZON2015-00007 Good Morning Gary, Notice received. I will get this notice, with 2 maps and city logo, in the November 19"' edition of The Times. Once published, I will send affidavits of publication to your attention. Thank vou, Louise Faxon Legal Advertising Community Newspapers/Portland Tribune 6605 SE Lake Rd, Portland 97222-2161 PO Box 22109, Portland OR 97269-2109 (503)546-0752;fax(503)620-3433 Legols Notices are online at:http://Publicnotices.portlandtribune.com From: Gary Pagenstecher [mailto:Garyp@tigard-or.gov] Sent: Monday, November 09, 2015 12:03 PM To: Louise Faxon Cc:Joe Patton; monet@leadershipcirclellc.com; Read Stapleton (Portland) (read.stapleton@cardno.com); 'Hossaini, Kelly';levi@staffordlandcompany.com Subject: Publication of Notice for CPA2015-00005/ZON2015-00007 Louise, Please publish the attached notice of public hearing and maps in the November 19`h edition of the Times and send an affidavit of publication. Thank you, Gary Gary Pagenstecher,AICP Associate Planner Community Development City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Phone: 503-718-2434 Fax: 503-718-2748 Email:garvp@tigard-or.gov 1 NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE,LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE-1-1-IIS NOTICE, r IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO TFIE PURCHASER. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BEFORE THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION ON MONDAY, DECEMBER 14, 2015, AT 7.00 PM, AND BEFORE THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 12, 2015, AT 7.30 PM THE PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL BE CONDUCTED IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER AT 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. THESE HEARINGS ARE FOR THE PURPOSE OF RECEIVING TESTIMONY FROM THE PUBLIC. FILE NOS.: Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) 2015-00005 Zone Change (ZON) 2015-00007 FILE TITLE: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R-12) PRESERVATION APPLICANT: City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: The city is initiating this Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment to facilitate preservation of R-12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use. The City proposes changing the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning Map Classifications of the subject parcels in SITE A (3 parcels totaling 1.54 acres) from professional commercial district (C-P) to medium density residential (R-12); and changing the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning Map Classifications of the subject parcel in SITE B (1 parcel of 1.37 acre) from medium density residential (R-12) to general commercial (C-G). LOCATION: SITE A: 7303 SW Spruce St., 10705 SW 72nd Ave., 10735 SW 72nd Ave; TAX MAP/ LOT #'s: 1 S136ACO2200, 1 S136ACO2400, 1 S136ACO2600; and SITE B: 13125 SW Pacific Hwy TAX MAP/ LOT# 2S102CB00200 COMP PLAN DESIGNATION/ ZONING DISTRICT: Medium Density Residential (R-12), Professional Commercial (C-P), General Commercial (C-G) APPLICABLE Community Development Code Chapters 18.380.020 and 18.390.060.6; Comprehensive Plan REVIEW Goals 1, 2, 10; Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 10; and Metro's Urban Growth Management CRITERIA: Functional Plan Title 1. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.390.060.E OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HAIL. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL 503-639-4171, EXT. 2438 (VOICE) OR 503-684-2772 (FDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. PUBLIC ORAL OR WRITTEN TESTIMONY IS INVITED. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILI. RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE PI_.ANNING COMMISSION MAY CONTINUE THF_. PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. THE PURPOSE OF TME PLANNING COMMISSION'S REVIEW IS TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL. THE COUNCIL WILL THEN HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ITEM AT A LATER DATE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NO'T'ED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25�) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING,A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25e,) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER GARY PAGENSTECHER AT 503-718-2432 (TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223) OR BY EMAIL TO ajT4atigard-or.gov. Ballot measure 56,adopted by the voters in 1998,and codified in ORS 227.186,requires the following language in this notice: This is to notify you that the City of Tigard has proposed a land use regulation that may affect the permissible uses of your property and other properties. NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE,LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE, Is IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL BE HELD BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON DECEMBER 14, 2015 AT 7:00 PM and THE CITY COUNCIL ON JANUARY 12, 2015 AT 7:30 PM. THE PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL BE CONDUCTED IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER AT 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. TIIESE HEARINGS ARE FOR THE PURPOSE OF RECEIVING TESTIMONY FROM THE PUBLIC. THE CITY HAS DETERMINED THAT ADOPTION OF TI IE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ORDINANCE MAY AFFECTTHE PERMISSIBLE_; USES OF YOUR PROPERTY,AND OTHER PROPERTIES IN THF, AFFECTED ZONES,AND MAY CHANGE THE VALUE OF YOUR PROPERTY. Why did I get this notice?: The city is initiating this Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone change to facilitate preservation of R-12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use. You are receiving this notice because you own residential or commercially zoned property that is affected by one or more of the changes described below. FILE NOS.: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) 2015-00005 Zone Change (ZON) 2015-00007 FILE TITLE: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R-12) PRESERVATION APPLICANT: City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: The city is initiating this Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment to facilitate preservation of R-12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use. Two sites (A and B) are in play by the development community that would benefit from the city's coordinating initiative. The City proposes this Comprehensive Plan and 'Zoning Map Amendment to change the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning Map Classifications of the subject parcels in SITE A (3 parcels totaling 1.54 acres) from professional commercial district (C-P) to medium density residential (R-12); and change the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning Map Classifications of the subject parcel in SITE B (1 parcel of 1.37 acre) from medium density residential (R-12) to general commercial (C-G). LOCATION: SITE A: 7303 SW Spruce St., 10705 SW 72nd Ave., 10735 SW 72nd Ave; TAX MAP/ LOT #'s: 1S136ACO2200, 1S136ACO2400, 1S136ACO2600;and SITE B: 13125 SW Pacific Hwy TAX MAP/ LOT# 2S102CB00200 COMP PLAN DESIGNATION/ ZONING DISTRICT: Medium Density Residential (R-12), Professional Commercial (C-P), General Commercial (C-G) APPLICABLE Community Development Code Chapters 18.380.020 and 18.390.060.(3; Comprehensive Plan REVIEW Goals 1, 2, 10; Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 10; and Metro's Urban Growth Management CRITERIA: Functional Plan Title 1. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.390.060.E OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL 503-639-4171, EXT. 2438 (VOICE) OR 503-684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. PUBLIC ORAL OR WRITTEN TESTIMONY IS INVITED. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVTTE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. THF. PURPOSE OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S REVIEW IS TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL.. THE COUNCIL WILL. THEN HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON TME ITEM AT A LATER DATE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25�) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING,A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25�) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT TI IE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER GARY PAGENSTECHER AT 503-718-2434 (TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW IIALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223) OR BY EMAIL'TO garyp@tigard-or.gov. i - „4i r VICINITY MAP , CPA 2015-00005 ZON 2015-00007 Medium Residential (R-12) Preservation SITE B R-12 Tigard Subject Site E(e entary R-12 ro C-G(1.3?BfPIAJ I - SC, O t 4 c� /y z J f--f tf-.t tl R-4.5 Information on this map is for general location ) only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. -- Approx.Scale 12,000-1 In=16/It ,.� Map printed at 09:11 AM on 05-Nov-15 0ATA IS DERIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES.THE CITY OF TIGARD MAKES NO WARRANTY,REPRESENTATION OR GUARANTEE AS TO THE + CONTENT,ACC RACY TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY OF / THE DATA PROVIDED HEREIN.THE CITY OF TIGARD SHALL ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS,OMISSIONS,OR INACCURACIES IN THE INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDLESS OF HOW CAUSED. City of Tigard Feet '� TIGAR MAPS 1T gard,OR 9761SWHall3d G 250 (P503 639-4171 www.tigardor.gov r"tk � VICINITY MAP Lu > CPA 2015-00005 PINE S 'i � ZON 2015-00007 Medium Residential (R-12) '14Preservation �w SITE A � 1 Subject Site 0 � p C,-P to R-12(1.54 acres) i l� y R-25 11! R-4.5 ¢ 7 Information on this map is for general location P* only and should be verified with the s - Development Services Division. Approx.Scale 1:2,000-1 In=16/it — -- Map printed at 09:19 AM on 05-Nov-15 DATA IS DERIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES.THE CITY OF TIGARD I MAKES NO WARRANTY,REPRESENTATION OR GUARANTEE AS TO THE CONTENT,ACCURACY,TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY OF THE DATA PROVIDED HEREIN.THE CITY OF TIGARD SHALL ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS,OMISSIONS,OR INACCURACIES IN THE INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDLESS OF HOW CAUSED. I ..,... _ i City oiTigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd • Feet r.�, r .; _. �IcAA MAPS Tigard, 639-4171 9-417123 � 250 _... __ nl PV) �- www.tigard-or.gov V � DLCD FORM 1 NOTICE OF A PROPOSED CHANGE FOR DLCD USE TO A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR File No.: LAND USE REGULATION Received: Local governments are required to send notice of a proposed change to a comprehensive plan or land use regulation at least 35 days before the first evidentiary hearing. (See OAR_660-018_-01020 for a post-acknowledgment plan amendment and OAR 6600=025-0080_ for a periodic review task). The rules require that the notice include a completed copy of this form. Jurisdiction: City of Tigard Local file no.: CPA2015-00005/ZON2015-00007 Please check the type of change that best describes the proposal: ❑ Urban growth boundary (UGB) amendment including more than 50 acres, by a city with a population greater than 2,500 within the UGB ❑ UGB amendment over 100 acres by a metropolitan service district ❑ Urban reserve designation,or amendment including over 50 acres, by a city with a population greater than 2,500 within the UGB ❑ Periodic review task—Task no.: ® Any other change to a comp plan or land use regulation (e.g., a post-acknowledgement plan amendment) Local contact person(name and title): Gary Pagenstecher Phone: 503-718-2434 E-mail: garyp@tigard-or.gov Street address: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard City: Tigard Zip: 97223- Briefly summarize the proposal in plain language. Please identify all chapters of the plan or code proposed for amendment(maximum 500 characters): The city is initiating this Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change to facilitate preservation of R-12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use. Date of first evidentiary hearing: 12/14/2015 Date of final hearing: 01/12/2016 ❑ This is a revision to a previously submitted notice. Date of previous submittal: Check all that apply: ❑ Comprehensive Plan text amendment(s) ® Comprehensive Plan map amendment(s)— Change from CP to M l� Change from M to CG ❑ New or amended land use regulation ® Zoning map amendment(s)— Change from C-P to R-12 Change from R-12 to C-G ❑ An exception to a statewide plarming goal is proposed—goal(s) subject to exception: ® Acres affected by map amendment: 3 Location of property, if applicable (site address and T, R, Sec.,TL): 13125 SW Pacific Hwy TAX MAP/ LOT# 2S102CB00200;7303 SW Spruce St., 10705 List affected state or federal agencies, local governments and special districts: LCDC, Metro ht [wwv .ire cn. ov KPL�a es _oLQis.asgX -1- Form updated November 1, 2013 NOTICE OF A PROPOSED CHANGE - SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS 1. Except under certain circumstances,' proposed Include this Form 1 as the first pages of a combined amendments must be submitted to DLCD's Salem file or as a separate file. office at least 35 days before the first evidentiary 5. File format: When submitting a Notice of a hearing on the proposal. The 35 days begins the day of Proposed Change via e-mail or FTP, or on a digital the postmark if mailed, or, if submitted by means other disc, attach all materials in one of the following than US Postal Service, on the day DLCD receives the formats: Adobe .pdf(preferred); Microsoft Office(for proposal in its Salem office. DLCD will not confirm example, Word .doc or docx or Excel .xls or xlsx); or receipt of a Notice of a Proposed Change unless ESRI .mxd, .gdb, or .mpk. For other file formats, requested. please contact the plan amendment specialist at 503- 2. A Notice of a Proposed Change must be submitted 934-0017 or plan.amendments(d).state.onus. by a local government(city, county, or metropolitan 6. Text: Submittal of a Notice of a Proposed Change service district). DLCD will not accept a Notice of a for a comprehensive plan or land use regulation text Proposed Change submitted by an individual or private amendment must include the text of the amendment firm or organization. and any other information necessary to advise DLCD 3. Hard-copy submittal: When submitting a Notice of the effect of the proposal. "Text"means the specific of a Proposed Change on paper, via the US Postal language proposed to be amended, added to, or deleted Service or hand-delivery, print a completed copy of from the currently acknowledged plan or land use this Form 1 on light green paper if available. Submit regulation. A general description of the proposal is not one copy of the proposed change, including this form adequate. The notice may be deemed incomplete and other required materials to: without this documentation. Attention: Plan Amendment Specialist 7. Staff report: Attach any staff report on the Dept. of Land Conservation and Development proposed change or information that describes when 635 Capitol Street NE, Suite 150 the staff report will be available and how a copy may Salem, OR 97301-2540 be obtained. This form is available here: 8. Local hearing notice: Attach the notice or a draft ice://)yww.ore ronzov/LCD/fol-tils.shtml of the notice required under ORS 197.763 regarding a 4. Electronic submittals of up to 20MB may be sent quasi-judicial land use hearing, if applicable. via e-mail. Address e-mails to plan.amendinents(u), 9. Maps: Submittal of a proposed map amendment state.orms with the subject line "Notice of Proposed must include a map of the affected area showing Amendment." existing and proposed plan and zone designations. A Submittals may also be uploaded to DLCD's FTP site paper map must be legible if printed on 8'/z" x 11" at paper. Include text regarding background,justification for the change, and the application if there was one 1_�tt�: ��ti_w otcnovit C DlI_ages;h<���a submrttahasl7 accepted by the local government. A map by itself is x. not a complete notice. E-mails with attachments that exceed 20MB will not be 10. Goal exceptions: Submittal of proposed received, and therefore FTP must be used for these amendments that involve a goal exception must include electronic submittals. The FTP site must be used for the proposed language of the exception. all .zip files regardless of size. The maximum file size for uploading via FTP is 150MB. 1660-018-0022 provides: (1)When a local government determines that no goals,commission rules,or land use statutes apply to a particular proposed change, the notice of a proposed change is not required[a notice of adoption is still required,however];and (2)If a local government determines that emergency circumstances beyond the control of the local government require expedited review such that the local government cannot submit the proposed change consistent with the 35-day deadline,the local government may submit the proposed change to the department as soon as practicable.The submittal must include a description of the emergency circumstances. http__j1www_orep�on.Epvll_CD�Pa es lorms..asp_x -2- Form updated November 1, 2013 If you have any questions or would like assistance, please contact your DLCD regional representative or the DLCD Salem office at 503-934-0017 or e-mail f�lan.amendments aLstate.or.us. Notice checklist. Include all that apply: ® Completed Form 1 ❑ The text of the amendment (e.g., plan or code text changes, exception findings,justification for change) ® Any staff report on the proposed change or information that describes when the staff report will be available and how a copy may be obtained ® A map of the affected area showing existing and proposed plan and zone designations ❑ A copy of the notice or a draft of the notice regarding a quasi-judicial land use hearing, if applicable ❑ Any other information necessary to advise DLCD of the effect of the proposal http_TW\Aw.ore�a1aovJLC_DJPa rns a,5 x, -3- Form updated November 1, 2013 CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FILE NOS: FILE NAME: C P g 2 0/S -05 1 207u 2_0(Y_-4)7 Mark the block to the left of the name of each person or organization that needs to be notified. CITY OFFICES CD Administration/Kenny Asher,CD Director CD Administration/Tom McGuire,Asst CD Director City Administration/Carol Krager,City Recorder Development Services/Planning-Engineering Techs. (except annexations) Development Services/Development Eng. Greg Berry(Copy on all Notices of Decision) Building Division/Mark VanDomelen,Building Official Police Department/Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer(Copy on all Notices of Decision) Public Works/Michelle Wright Public Works/Karleen Aichele,Engineer Tech 1 Hearings Officer(2 sets) Planning Commission (12 sets) City Attorney File/Reference 2 sets) LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS City of Beaverton,Planning Manager,POB 4755,Beaverton OR 97076* City of Beaverton,Steven Sparks,Dev Svcs Mgr,POB 4755,Beaverton OR 97076* City of Durham City Manager,17160 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd,Durham OR 97224* City of King City City Manager, 15300 SW 116th Ave,King City OR 97224* City of Lake Oswego,Planning Director,PO Box 369,Lake Oswego OR 97034* City of Portland,Planning Bureau Director, 1900 SW 4th Ave,Suite 4100,Portland OR 97201 City of Tualatin Planning Manager,18880 SW Martinazzi Ave,Tualatin OR 97062* Metro-Land Use and Planning,600 NE Grand Ave,Portland OR 97232-2736,Joanna Mensher,Data Resource Center (ZCA-Ado ted)* Metro-Land Use and Planning,600 NE Grand Ave,Portland OR 97232-2736,Paulette Copperstone, (ZCA-RFC Only)* vP'_ Metro-Land Use and Planning,600 NE Grand Ave,Portland OR 97232-2736,Brian Harper,PhD, (CPA/DCA/ZON)* tr- -"7 VODOT,Rail Division,Dave Lanning,Sr. Crossing Safety Specialist,555 13th Street NE,Suite 3,Salem OR 97301-4179 (Notify if ODOT R/R-Hwy Crossing is only access to land).Email:Regionl_DEVREV_Applications@odot.state.or.us ODOT,Region 1 -Development Review Coordinator Carl Torland,Right-of-Way Section, 123 NW Flanders,Portland OR 97209-4037 (Vacations)* Email:Regionl_DEVREV_Applications@odot.state.or.us ODOT Region 1 Development Review Program, 123 NW Flanders St,Portland OR 97209 Email:Regionl_DEVREV_Applications@odot.state.or.us OR Dept of Energy,Bonneville Power Administration,Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Ferrera,POB 3621,Portland OR 97208-3621 owerlines in area) OR Dept of Aviation,Tom Highland,Planning,3040 25th Street,SE,Salem OR 97310 (monopole towers) OR Dept of Environmental Quality(DEQ),Regional Administrator,2020 SW Fourth Ave,Suite 400,Portland OR 97201- 4987 OR Dept of Fish&Wildlife,Elizabeth Ruther,Habitat Biologist,North Willamette Watershed District, 18330 NW Sauvie Island Road,Portland OR 97231 OR Dept of Geo.&Mineral Ind.,800 NE Oregon street,Suite 965,Portland OR 97232 ept of LandConservation& ev.,Mara Ulloa,635 CapitolStreet NE,Suite 150,Salem OR 97301-2540(Comp, an Amendments&Measure 37)-You have the option to send electronic copies. See DLCD website for online submittal procedures OR Division of State Lands,Melinda Wood(WLUN Form Required),775 Summer Street NE,Suite 100,Salem OR 97301 1279 Documents should be emailed/do not send hard copies I/CURPLN/MASTERS/REO FOR COMMENTS NOTIFICATION LIST(UPDATED 03/30/15) Page 1 of 2 CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS OR Parks and Rec Dept State Historic Preservation Office,725 Sumner St NE,Suite C,Salem OR 97301 (Notify if property has HD overlay) OR Public Utilities Commission,PO Box 1088,Salem OR 97308-1088 US Army Corps of Engineers,Kathryn Harris,Routing CENWP-OP-G,POB 2946,Portland OR 97208-2946 (Maps and CWS letter only) Washington County Consolidated Communications Agency(WCCCA) "911",Dave Austin,POB 6375,Beaverton OR 97007-0375 (monopole towers) Washington County,Dept of Land Use&Trans,Naomi Vogel-Beattie,1400 SW Walnut St MS 51 Hillsboro OR 97123- 5625 (general apps)* Washington County,Dept of Land Use&Trans,Brent Curtis,155 N First Ave,Suite 350,MS 13,Hillsboro OR 97124 j' (CPA)* Washington County,Assessment&Taxation, 155 N First Ave,Suite 350,ISIS 9,Hillsboro OR 97124(ZCA)* Washington County,Dept of Land Use&Trans,Doria Nlateja,Cartography,155 N First Ave,Suite 350,AIS 14,Hillsboro OR 97124 ZCA * UTILITY PROVIDERS,SPECIAL DISTRICTS&AGENCIES Beaverton School District#48,Jennifer Garland,Demographics, 16550 SW Merlo Rd,Beaverton OR 97006-5152 Century Link,Right-of-Way Department,Qwest Corporation dba Century Link QC, 1208 NE 64th St,4th Floor,Seattle WA 98115 Century Link,Attn: John Pfeifer, 1600 7th Ave,4th Floor,Seattle,WA 98191-0000 (proposed and approved Annexation notices) Century Link,Karen Stewart,Local Government Affairs Director,310 SW Park Ave,Portland OR 97205 (proposed and approved Annexation notices) Clean Water Services,Development Services Department,David Schweitzer/SWM Program,2550 SW Hillsboro Hwy, Hillsboro OR 97123* Comcast Cable Corp.,Gerald Backhaus,14200 SW Brigadoon Court,Beaverton OR 97005 (See map for area contact) Metro Area Communications Commission (MACC),Fred Christ, 15201 NW Greenbrier Parkway,C-1,Beaverton OR 97006-4886 (annexations only) NW Natural Gas Company,Brian Kelley,Engineering Coord.,220 NW Second Ave,Portland OR 97209-3991 NW Natural Gas Company,Account Services,ATTN: Annexation Coordinator 220 NW Second Ave,Portland OR 97209- 3991 (:lnnexati<nis only) Portland General Electric,Lorraine Katz,2213 SW 153rd Drive,Beaverton OR 97006 Portland General Electric,Tod L.Shattuck,2213 SW 153rd Drive,Beaverton OR 97006 Portland Western R/R,Burlington Northern/Sante Fe R/R,Oregon Electric R/R, (Burlington,Northern/Sante Fe R/R predecessor),Bruce Carswell,President and GM,200 Hawthorne Ave SE,Suite C320,Salem OR 97301-5294 Union Pacific Railroad,Director of Public Affairs,301 NE 2nd Ave,Portland OR 97232(currently the PA Dir is Brock Nelson,503-249-3079) Tigard/Tualatin School District#23J,Teri Brady,Administrative Offices,6960 SW Sandburg St,Tigard OR 97223-8039 Tigard Water District,POB 230281,Tigard OR 97281-0281 Tualatin Hills Parks and Rec District,Planning Mgr,15707 SW Walker Rd,Beaverton OR 97006* Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue,John Wolff,DeputyFire Marshall,11945 SW 70th Ave,Tigard OR 97223-9196* Tualatin Valley Water District,Administrative Office,1850 SW 170th Ave,Beaverton OR 97006* Tri-Met Transit Development,Ben Baldwin,Project Planner,1800 SW 1st Ave#300,Portland,OR 97201 (If project is within 1/4 mile of a transit route Verizon,John Cousineau,OSP Network,4155 SW Cedar Hills Blvd,Beaverton OR 97005 *Indicates automatic notification in compliance with intergovernmental agreement if within 500'of the subject property for any/all city projects (Project Planner is Responsible for Indicating Parties to Notify) 'Phis document is password protected. Please see Joe or Doreen if you need updates to it.Thank you. I/CURPLN/MASTERS/REO FOR COMMENTS NOTIFICATION LIST(UPDATED 03/30/15) Page 2 of 2 Gary Pagenstecher From: Gary Pagenstecher Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 8:03 AM To: 'paulette.copperstone@oregonmetro.gov'; 'brent_curtis@co.washington.or.us'; 'humphreysj@cleanwaterservices.org'; 'Region l_DEVREV_Applications@odot.state.or.us'; Iplan.amend ments@state.or.us' Subject: Request for Comments Attachments: CPA2015-00005 Request for Comments.docx; Site A.pdf, Site B.pdf Agencies, Please find attached, a Request for Comments for a City proposed Comp Plan Amendment and Zone change for properties described in the attached maps for the two sites. Notice of the proposal was sent earlier this week. If providing comment please respond by December 2"d. Call me with any questions you may have. Thank you, Gary Gary Pagenstecher,AICP Associate Planner Community Development City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Phone: 503-718-2434 Fax: 503-718-2748 Email:garyp@tigard-or.gov 1 CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: November 17, 2015 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Gary Pagenstecher,Associate Planner Phone: (503) 718-2434 Fax: (503) 718-2788 E-Mail:-Garyp@tigard-or.gov - MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R-12) PRESERVATION - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) 2015-00005 ZONE CHANGE (ZON) 2015-00007 REQUEST: The city is initiating this Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment to facilitate preservation of R-12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use. The City proposes changing the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning Map Classifications of the subject parcels in SITE A (3 parcels totaling 1.54 acres) from professional commercial district (C-P) to medium density residential (R-12); and changing the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning Map Classifications of the subject parcel in SITE B (1 parcel of 1.37 acre) from medium density residential (R-12) to general commercial (C-G). LOCATION: SITE A: 7303 SW Spruce St., 10705 SW 72nd Ave., 10735 SW 72nd Ave; TAX MAP/ LOT #'s: 1S136ACO2200, 1S136ACO2400, 1S136ACO2600; and SITE B: 13125 SW Pacific Hwy TAX MAP/ LOT # 2S102CB00200. ZONES: Medium Density Residential (R-12), Professional Commercial (C-P), General Commercial (C-G). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.380.020 and 18.390.060.G; Comprehensive Plan Goals 1, 2, 10; Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 10; and Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Title 1. Attached are Comp Plan Designation and Zoning District exhibits for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation to the Planning Commission will be prepared on the proposal in the near future and be made available one week prior to the PC hearing on December 14, 2015. If you wish to comment on this proposal, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: THURSDAY DECEMBER 2, 2015. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter or email. Written comments provided below: Name&Number of Person Commenting: PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES PRE-APPLICATION NOTES FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN& ZONING MAP AMENDMENT November 2, 2015 STAFF PRESENT: Gary Pagenstecher,Tom McGuire APPLICANT: City PROPERTY LOCATION: 7303 SW Spruce St., 10705 SW 72"d Ave., 10735 SW 72"d Ave;and 13125 SW Pacific Hwy TAX MAP/ LOT#'s: 1 S 1 36ACO2200, 1 S 1 36ACO2400, 1S136ACO2600;and 2S102CB00200 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: The city is initiating this Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment to facilitate preservation of R-12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use. The two sites are in play by the development community that would benefit from the city's initiative. To meet the developers' expectations, time:is of the essence: Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment to change the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning Map Classifications of the subject parcels (3 totaling 1.54 acres) from professional commercial district (C-P) to medium density residential (R-12); and change the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning Map Classifications of the subject parcel (1 of 1.37 acre) from medium density residential (R-12) to general commercial (C-G). COMP PLAN DESIGNATIONS: Professional Commercial;and Medium Density Residential ZONING: CP;and R-12 NARRATIVE Include a narrative that responds to the applicable review criteria. Provide background and findings of fact as to why the comprehensive plan amendment and zoning map amendment are necessary, or what public benefit is being promoted. APPLICABLE CRITERIA The recommendation by the Commission and the decision by the Council shall be based on consideration of the following factors (18.390.060.G. Decision-making considerations): 1.The Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197; 2. Any federal or state statutes or regulations found applicable; 3.Any applicable METRO regulations; 4.Any applicable comprehensive plan policies;and 5.Any applicable provisions of the City's implementing ordinances. APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS (18.390.060 Type IV Procedure): a. Include the information requested on the application form; • 1 b. Address the relevant criteria in sufficient detail for review and action; c. Be accompanied by the required fee; d. Be accompanied by 18 copies of the narrative. PROCESS The Commission shall make a recommendation to the Council on a zone change application; the Council shall a. Have the responsibility to approve, approve with modifications, approve with conditions, deny or adopt an alternative to an application for the legislative change or to remand to the commission for rehearing and reconsideration on all or part of an application transmitted to it under this title; b. Consider the recommendation of the commission, however, it is not bound by the commission's recommendation; and c. Act by ordinance which shall be signed by the mayor after the council's adoption of the ordinance. DECISION The decision timeline acknowledges time is of essence and has targeted December 14,2015 PC hearing date and January 19, 2016 CC hearing date. APPLICATION FEES: NA for City initiated legislative change LegisladveComprehensive Plan Amendment: $11,013.00 Quasi-Judicial Zoning Map Amendment 4,496.00 Total Fees: $15,509.00 2 APPLICANT MATERIALS City of Tigard a COMMUNITY DE=VELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Master Land Use Application LAND USE APPLICATION TYPE ❑ Adjustment/Variance (II) ❑ Minor Land Partition (II) Comprehensive Plan Amendment (IV) ❑ Planned Development (III) ❑ Conditional Use (III) ❑ Sensitive Land Review (II or III) ❑ Development Code Amendment (IV) ❑ Site Development Review (II) ❑ Downtown Design Review(II, III) ❑ Subdivision (II or III) ❑ Historic Overlay (II or III) X Zone Change (III) ❑ Home Occupation (II) ❑ Zone Change Annexation (IV) NOTE: For required submittal elements,please refer to your pre-application conference notes. PROPOSAL SUMMARY (Brief description) The city is initiating this Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment to facilitate preservation of R-12 zoned land and ensure it is applied in a location that supports residential use. The two sites are in play by the development community that would benefit from the city's initiative. To meet the developers' expectations, time is of the essence: Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment to change the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning Map Classifications of the subject parcels (3 totaling 1.54 acres) from professional commercial district (C-P) to medium density residential (R-12); and change the Comprehensive Plan Designations and Zoning Map Classifications of the subject parcel (1 of 1.37 acre) from medium density residential (R-12) to general commercial (C-G). PROPERTY INFORMATION (where proposed activity will occur) Location (address if available): ! Z.5 S W ill F/C W ' 7 30.� SpA U--E D C j 1 Tax maps and tax lot #s: Z S)ceC-0 c7D ZW 1513 Ac-G2ZdC c-;_5-e-, C Z 1(00 Total site size: 37J,5�(t� Zoning classification: �-�2- ' C:-P APPLICANT INFORMATION �, a 0Qa7 _ Case No.: Name: Pat= 1 6,gAb Related Case No.(s):Zd1"I.Z.iO/,A Mailing address: / 3/-z 5 5 w Hhct /31o6 City/state: T/ 6,172 b CR'�Z Zip: 7-1-23 Application Fee: 1V0q Phone number: SU - (`t3 ' 2 y �pplicati>, ccepted: Prima contact name: By: iJ Date: Primary Phone number: �/'`J 1 Z''3 Application determined complete: Email: �! 14,14 pa- tl Cl�l� _17lr; . �O 1/ By: Date: I:\CURPLN\Masters\Land Use Applications Rev.11/25/2014 City of Tigard • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard,Oregon 97223 • www.tigard-or.gov • 503-718-2421 • Page 1 of 2 PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER INFORMATION (Attach list if more than one) Al.-) Name: Mailing address: City/state: Zip: Phone: Email: When the owner and the applicant are different people,the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. THE APPLICANTS) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • If the application is granted,the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan,attachments,and exhibits transmitted herewith,are true;and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued,based on this application,map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application,including the policies and criteria, and understands the requ ements for approving or denying the application(s). Applica is signature Print name CAAf, j,/ toi; Date Applicant/Agent/Representative's signature Print name Date Applicant/Agent/Representative's signature Print name Date SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property required Owner's signature Print name Date Owner's signature Print name Date Owner's signature Print name Date Owner's signature Print name Date MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION City of Tigard • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard,Oregon 97223 • www.tigard-or.gov 503-715-2421 • Page 2 of 2 Gary Pagenstecher To: Brown, Ernest; Hossaini, Kelly Subject: RE: R-12 zone change Testimony Thank you both. From: Brown, Ernest [mailto:ebrown(&ttsd.k12.or.us] Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 7:08 AM To: Hossaini, Kelly; Gary Pagenstecher Subject: Re: R-12 zone change Testimony Dear Gary, I authorize you to process the zone change application, as described below, on behalf of the Tigard-Tualatin School District. Sincerely, Ernie From: Kelly Hossaini<kelly.hossaini@rnillernash.com> Date:Sunday,January 24, 2016 at 7:05 PM To:Gary Pagenstecher<Garyp@tigard-or.gov> Cc: Ernie Brown<ebrown@ttsd.kl2.or.us>, Kelly Hossaini<kelly.hossaini@millernash.com> Subject: RE: R-12 zone change Testimony Hi, Gary - Thanks for checking in. Ernie - Will you reply to this email to Gary and authorize him to process the zone change application on behalf of the District, as owner of the old Hibbard property? Thanks much - Kelly Kelly Hossaini Partner, Real Estate and Land Use Team Leader Miller Nash Graham & Dunn LLP 3400 U.S. Bancorp Tower 1111 S.W. Fifth Avenue I Portland,Oregon 97204 Direct:503.205.2332 1 Office:503.224.5858 1 Fax: 503.224.0155 E-Mail I Bio I Social I Blogs Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:This e-mail message may contain confidential or privileged information. If you have received this message by mistake, please do not review, disclose, copy, or distribute the e-mail. Instead, please notify us immediately by replying to this message or telephoning us.Thank you. -------------------------------------- From: Gary Pagenstecher [Garyp@tigard-or.gov] Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2016 3:43 PM To: Hossaini, Kelly Subject: RE: R-12 zone change Testimony 1 Kelly, The City Attorney has determined that the R-12 swap should be processed quasi-judiciously. We have already used qj notice, but will be amending the findings to include qj criteria. The CA asked that the file contain property owner authorization for the application. I do have that from Monet, but not from the property owner for Site B. Please send me an authorization on behalf of the TTSD. Thanks, Gary 2 Gary Pagenstecher From: Richard Topping <toppingr@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 12:11 PM To: levi@staffordlandcompany.com Cc: KTopping;Gary Pagenstecher Subject: Re: R-12 zone change on Topping property Hi Gary, Please accept this email as our authorization for the city's R-12 preservation comprehensive plan amendment zone change application. Best regards Richard & Katie Topping 19765 Derby St, West Linn OR 97068 On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Levi <levigstaffordlandcompanY com> wrote: Hello Toppings, Please see the forwarded email from Gary who I have copied on this email. Would one of you please reply to all with explicit authorization of the City of Tigard's R-12 Preservation, Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change Application? Thank you, From: Gary Pagenstecher [mailto:Garypgti arg d-or.gov] Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 11:27 AM To: 'levi ,staffordlandcompany.com' <levi o,staffordlandcompany.com> Subject: RE: R-12 zone change on Topping property An email would be sufficient. They have testified in support of the project, giving tacit approval. The email gives explicit authorization. Thank you. Gary From: Levi [ma iIto:levi@staffordlandcompany.corn] Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 8:50 AM To: Gary Pagenstecher Subject: RE: R-12 zone change on Topping property Hi Gary, Is there a specific form, or do you just need an email indicating their atitliorization9 Thanks, Levi Levasa I Acquisition Et Development A N D C 0 M P A N Y Stafford LandCoLnp - - a--Dy— COM 503.765.5496 1 direct 503.305.7647 1 office tevi @staff ord tandcomp n ,cam a _�Lo 485 South State Street, Lake Oswego, OR 97034 From: Gary Pagenstecher [mailto:GarypDy ,,tigard-ongov] Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2016 3:36 PM To: 'levi (Lbstaflordlandcompany.com' <Ievia staffordlandcompqnycom> — Subject: R-12 zone change on Topping property Levi, For the record, could you please send me an authorization from the owner of Site A (Topppings) for the city's R-12 Preservation comp plan amendment zone change application. We are completing the application record applicable to a quasi-judicial procedure, while still processing the application legislatively. I thought I had the Toppings authorization, but am not finding it. Thank you, Gary 2 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS v l IJy ke 4 ...._....ate• ._..._._... .,..,,...._ 'crit" • .., Appendix A �a -� � �� �; �q Traffic Count Worksheets 3 r Gary Pagenstecher From: BROOKING Joshua C <Joshua.C.BROOKING @odot.state.or.us> Sent: Monday, November 30, 2015 2:51 PM To: Gary Pagenstecher Cc: Mike McCarthy Subject: FW: Tigard Zone Change Trip Analysis See below.Thanks! From: JEFFREY James A *Andy Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 12:43 PM To: BROOKING Joshua C Cc: DANIELSON Marah B; JENSVOLD Martin R Subject: Tigard Zone Change Trip Analysis Josh, Thanks for your help in analyzing the trip generation based on the development code and zone changes at 7303 SW Spruce St. It doesn't look like we'll have a problem since the reasonable worst case scenario of the proposed zoning doesn't come close to the existing conservative reasonable worst case scenario. Below is what I came up with: - Existing Professional Commercial Zoning(CP): 220 PM trips (assumptions: "Post Office—732"; 15,000 sf post office building size taken from averages around the region) - Proposed Medium Density Residential (R12):43 PM trips(assumptions: "Single Family Detached—210"; 1.45 ac lot; 3,050 sf/unit; doubled for inclusion of"Accessory Units") Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! Andy Jeffrey, P.E. Transportation Analyst ODOT Region 1 Planning Andy.Jeffrey@odot.state.or.us 503-731-8435 1 Gary Pagenstecher From: DANIELSON Marah B <Marah.B.DANIELSON@odot.state.or.us> Sent: Monday, November 30, 2015 11:50 AM To: Gary Pagenstecher; BROOKING Joshua C Cc: Mike McCarthy Subject: RE: Proposed R-12 to C-G zone Change Hi Gary, I think it would be helpful if we joined you by phone. Please call us at 503-731-8453. Thanks. Marah Danielson, Senior Planner O1)(_)T R l I)evelopment Review Manning Lead (50.3) 731-8255 marah.b.danielsonnodot.state.or.us From: Gary Pagenstecher [mailto:Garyp@tiaard-or.gov] Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2015 1:29 PM To: DANIELSON Marah B; BROOKING Joshua C Cc: Mike McCarthy Subject: RE: Proposed R-12 to C-G zone Change Mara, Thanks for your phone call last week regarding CPA2015-00005. Please find attached the July 15, 2015 Kittelson TIA addressing the TPR that was submitted earlier by the applicant for CPA2015-00003. Although CPA 2015-00003 has been withdrawn in favor of the City's legislative zone change,the analysis should still serve. Kittelson's report proposes mitigation measures that we anticipate making a condition of any zone change. Please review and comment. Mike McCarthy and I are meeting at 2:30 this Monday afternoon to discuss the matter.You are welcome to join us in person or on the phone. Thanks, Gary Gary Pagenstecher,AICP Associate Planner Community Development City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Phone: 503-718-2434 Fax: 503-718-2748 Email:garyp@tigard-or.gov DISCLAIMERS E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public, record laws. If requested, e-mail 1 ,FAIR . HOUSING �JUNNCIL I e f S 4 Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Civic Center—Town Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 December 11,2015 i RE:Proposed Amendment to Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map LOCAL FILE#:ZON2015-00006/SUB2 DLCD FILE#:006-15 Dear Planning Commissioners, 1 This letter is jointly submitted on behalf of the Fair Housing Council of Oregon(FHCO)and Housing Land Advocates(HLA). Both FHCO and HLA are non-profit organizations that advocate for land use policies and practices that ensure an adequate andappropriate supply of affordable housing for all Oregonians. This letter provides additional information to support staffs recommendation to deny the above- ! referenced application to amend the Comprehensive Plan Map from Medium Density Residential R-12 to Medium Density Residential R-7 for 6.05 acres located at 15435 SW Hall Blvd. Please include these comments in the record. i In the staffs findings for Comprehensive Plan Policy 2.1.15.0 and D,the City recognized Goal 10's implementation requirement that"[PJlans should provide for a continuing review of housing need E projections and should establish a process for accommodating needed revisions." As the staff describes, the City's Housing Strategies report illustrated that in 2013 the City had twice as much buildable land in areas zoned R-7 than in areas zoned R-12. In addition,the R-7 district is limited to single family attached and detached dwellings while the R-12 zoning district allows for a full range of housing types, including potential development of more affordable housing. The City currently has substantially more land zoned R-7 than R-12,thus the change in zoning to add more land to the R-7 inventory would negatively impact housing choice,diversity,and affordability within Tigard. To further support the staffs findings under Comprehensive Plan Policy 2.1.15.0 and D,we add that any action by the City that results in a reduction in housing diversity and affordability could contribute to Washington County's failure to comply with its obligation to affirmatively further fair housing under the federal Fair Housing Act.The Washington County Consolidated Plan 2015-2020 describes that Tigard has seen dramatic increases in the number of residents living in poverty between 2000-2012,and in its key findings states, The last ten years have seen significant changes in poverty and vacancy rates coupled with significant population and growth in Washington County.Poverty rates in Washington County have risen since 2007 with the suburbanization of poverty as a factor.Cities like Tualatin, Beaverton,Hillsboro and Tigard have seen dramatic increases in the number of residents living 1221 SW Yamhill Street, Portland, Oregon 97205 FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL OF MOMc in poverty between 2000 and 2012.While Portland is seeing high rates of urban revitalization, poverty has been pushed to the fringes of its borders,including Washington County.The region is seeing unprecedented low rental vacancy rates,due in part to significant in-migration into the area for high-wage jobs.These factors combined have resulted in an incredibly tight rental market,which is especially challenging for extremely low-income and special needs households. As of now,it has dramatically increased demand for affordable housing,rents and home prices x` for renters,homebuyers and homeowners. See Executive Summary,p.v. (emphasis added. The Executive Summary is attached here as Attachment 1 and the entirety of the plan is available at http:l/www.co.w"hington.or.tWC6m uunit-yDdvelopmerit7Plannmg/2015-2020-consolidated=pltb.tfm. Therefore,any reduction in the inventory of lands available for multi-family housing will fiuther impact * the availability of affordable housing in Tigard,and the County. $' In addition,the applicant,Venture Properties,has not demonstrated that the application satisfies Comprehensive Plan Policy 10.1.1 that requires the City of Tigard maintain land use"standards that provide opportunities to develop a variety of housing types that meet the needs,preferences and financial capabilities of Tigard's present and future residents"consistent with statewide land use planning goals and associated rules.Furthermore,the applicant has not demonstrated compliance with Title 1 of the Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan which requires each city to maintain or increase its housing capacity and the applicant cannot meet this requirement because the requested zone change would reduce housing capacity. We urge you to deny this application because maintaining the R-12 designation will protect the finite quantity of land available for affordable housing within the City of Tigard. In contrast,maintaining the R-12 designation will help the City achieve the highest levels of equal opportunity housing choice possible and will help to ensure that it is fulfilling its obligations to affirmatively further fair housing. Please feel free to call or email with any questions. 1 Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Jennifer Bra gar Dix, gar Affirmatively Further Fair Housing Specialist President,Housing Land Advocates GSB:742813.1[30187.00129] i S 1221 SW Yamhill Street, Portland, Oregon 97205 "