The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 12/12/2017 City of Tigard Tigard Business Meeting—Agenda TIGARD TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE AND TIME: December 12,2017 - 6:30 p.m. Study Session;7:30 p.m. Business Meeting MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard-Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available,ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Citizen Communication items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager. Times noted are estimated;it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda items can be heard in any order after 7:30 p.m. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 503-718-2419, (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers,it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-718-2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). SEE ATTACHED AGENDA VIEW LIVE VIDEO STREAMING ONLINE: httn://live.tigard-or.gov CABLE VIEWERS:The regular City Council meeting is shown live on Channel 28 at 7:30 p.m. The meeting will be rebroadcast at the following times on Channel 28: Thursday 6:00 p.m. Sunday 11:00 a.m. Friday 10:00 p.m. Monday 6:00 a.m. likiCity of Tigard Tigard Business Meeting—Agenda TIGARD in TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE AND TIME: December 12,2017 - 6:30 p.m. Study Session; 7:30 p.m. Business Meeting MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard-Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 6:30 PM •STUDY SESSION A. RECEIVE POLICE DEPARTMENT UPDATE TO COUNCIL 6:30 p.m. estimated time B. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS 6:45 p.m. estimated time •EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive Session is called to order, the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute. All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 7:30 PM 1. BUSINESS MEETING A. Call to Order B. Roll Call C. Pledge of Allegiance D. Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 2. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION (Two Minutes or Less,Please) A. Follow-up to Previous Citizen Communication B. Tigard High School Student Envoy C. Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce D. Citizen Communication—Sign Up Sheet 3. CONSENT AGENDA: (Tigard City Council) These items are considered routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion.Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: A. RECEIVE AND FILE: 1. Council Calendar 2. Council Tentative Agenda for Future Meeting Topics •Consent Agenda-Items Removed for Separate Discussion:Any items requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion will be considered immediately after the Council/City Center Development Agency has voted on those items which do not need discussion. 4. APPOINTMENT OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS 7:35 p.m. estimated time 5. APPOINTMENT OF TOWN CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION MEMBERS 7:40 p.m. estimated time 6. LEVY AND BOND ADVISORY TASK FORCE DISCUSSION 7:45 p.m. estimated time 7. LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING: TIGARD TRIANGLE LEAN CODE PHASE II 8:25 p.m. estimated time 8. NON AGENDA ITEMS 9. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive Session is called to order,the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute.All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 10. ADJOURNMENT 9:10 p.m. estimated time AIS-3338 A. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 12/12/2017 Length (in minutes): 15 Minutes Agenda Title: Present Police Department Update to Council Prepared For: Kathy McAlpine, Police Submitted By: Carol Krager, Central Services Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: Council Business Mtg - Study Sess. Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Chief McAlpine will update council on the five-year department assessment which includes staff and crime data. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST N/A KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY Chief McAlpine will discuss the assessment and ask council what they would like to hear about in a monthly update about the Police Department.. OTHER ALTERNATIVES COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION N/A Attachments No file(s) attached. 12/12/2017 SFUPORP (DATE OF 6-(41.)Pn vited• 091 ice chie4 Me 14/P141 Strategic Planning Process Vision Operational Plan /V (Strategic Priorities, .0•007. Goals,Action Plans,KPIs Current State Analysis Current State Analysis What is it? A holistic 360 degree/multi-dimensional view of the organization and the environment in which it must operate. The time for an objective and thorough analysis that brings to the surface clues about what the organization should focus on and what priorities and goals to establish. An opportunity to stay open and learn about what is actually occurring both inside and outside the organization; a time to be influenced by what the data reveals to you. 1 12/12/2017 Current State Analysis To gain a"business truth"of where the organization is today so that it is possible to plan effectively for moving from the current reality to the desired future and results. To learn before planning. Gathering data and Information from both internal and external sources(hard and soft data) Understanding factors that are currently affecting or will affect the organization's ability to fulfill its mission. Analysis informs the organization's vision,strategic priorities,and specific goals. 3 surveys,hard data as it relates to employees Employee Crime data needs& trends Funding survey, hard data as it relates to City goals& Community community priorities needs&trends National Current TPD trends& programs& best services practices Current org structure, systems, processes 2 Tigard PD Strategic Dashboard v01 !cif -N-. for November 2017 -‘ :11.01' 1 ----- ' g= 2016 Population Estimate: 51,253 (Adopted Budget FY 2017-2018) Calls For Service - By Month PUBLIC DEMAND 1 ICalls For Service I — ..= i I IAN FLO MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV 1 I * SELF INITIATED 1 2000 1800 1600 I 14(8) 1590 1180 5377 104(7 SO) 600 4 a I JAN TER MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV I Tracking Code Cases 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 The tracked counts of these have all Overdo Null Null 2 10 12 increased. Each involves multiple officers, evidence processing,and trips to POH 134 133 124 116 133 hospitals in some cases. Suicide Null Null 3 4 7 Att. 35 27 59 30 61 DHS referrals and cases of allegations of abuse to an elderly or mentally . .,--"--MIN 2013 2014 015 t11111Kaliii' • ' 1— challenged victim end up in the caseload IDHS 346 349 457 403 520 of Detectives and SRO's. IVulnera 32 37 17 25 40 I Domestic Violence reports have 1 1 doubled in 5 years and we haven't Dom 125 120 95 71 119 even completed 2017 yet. DV No NULL NULL 48 99 131 Total 125 120 143 170 250 1 Tigard PD Strategic Dashboard /� for November 2017 .. 2016 Population Estimate: 51,253 (Adopted Budget FY 2017-2018) Employee Snapshot Department Staffing Information Actual Budget %Budget Sworn 70 72 97% Non-Sworn 16.5 16.5 100% Total Number of Personnel 86.5 88.5 98% Patrol Officer Staffing 33 351 Personnel Unavailable for Work Patrol All Other Overall #of Recruits in Pre-Academy - - - # of Recruits in Academy 2 - 2 #of Recruits in F1'LP 1 - 1 # of Personnel on Extended Sick Leave - 1 1 #of Personnel on Military Leave - - - # of Personnel on Light Duty 2 - 2 #of Personnel on Administrative Leave - - - Total Personnel Unavailable to Work during some Period during the Month 5 1 6 Total Personnel Available to Work during some Period during the Month 28 Operational Effectiveness Snapshot Plunge(Information is based on the hest available data. FY 2016-2017 Budget FY 2017-2018 Budget Percent YTD Status Percent YTD Status Department Budget Actual Budgeted Actual Budgeted Administrative 47% 42%0 5% 37% 42% -5% Operations 37% 42%' -5% 40% 42% -2% Services 37% 42% -5% 42% 42% ' 0% Total Department Budget 38% 42% -4% 41% 42% ' -1% Budget Information is based on the best available data. FY 2016-2017 $ud rf t FY 2017-2018 Budget Percent YTD - Percent YTD g Status Status Department Overtime Actual Budgeted Actual Budgeted Administrative 34% 42% -' -8% 40% 42% -2% Operations 51% 42% C 9% 28% 42% -14% Services 33% 42% -9% 43% 42% 41 1% Total Overtime 44% 42% C 2% 32% 42% -10% SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET FOR/a- % [,. * h"�lzs�, *f Tigard PD Strategic Dashbo �PATE °F MEETING) �t. , s t Iic-ell 1MCP)-0441 R.--) for November 2017 i rf 2016 Population Estimate: 51,253 (Adopted Budget FY 2017-2018) !�1=,*Ti.A4‘ Crime Snapshot Selected Group A Offenses Nov 2016 Nov 2017 % Chg 2016 YTD 2017 YTD "_, Chg Person Crime 31 36# 16.13% 316 371 0 17.41% Assault 21 26 0 23.81% 221 278 # 25.79% Robbery 1 4* 300.00% 32 35 0 9.38% Property Crime 223 221 0 -0.90% 2871 2450 0 -14.66% Burglary-Residential 6 7 0 16.67% 60 68 40 13.33% Burglary-Business 3 5 0 66.67% 28 39 # 39.29% Burglary- Other 0 4• 400.00% 20 40 0 100.00% UUMV 11 6 0 -45.45% 81 83 0 2.47% Theft 95 88 0 -7.37% 1252 1037 0 -17.17% Vandalism 10 25! 150.00% 158 280 0 77.22% Societal Crimes 44 30 0 -31.82% 481 451 0 -6.24% DUII 11 5 e -54.55% 71 87 40 22.54% Drug Offense 11 10 0 -9.09% 162 144 • -11.11% Disorderly Conduct 2 4-0 100.00% 34 38 40 11.76% Calls for Service Nov 2016 Nov 2017 % Chg 2016 YTD 2017 YTD % Chg Dispatched Calls 1550 1831 0 18.13% 18277 19316 # 5.68% Self Initiated Calls 1334 1668 0 25.04% 17082 18004 # 5.40% Response Time Priority 1 &2 6.67 5.77 0 -13.49% 6.22 6.25 0 0.48% Priority 3 10.12 10.75! 6.23% 9.92 10.72 * 8.06% Priority 4 + 13.12 10.85 0 -17.30% 10.08 10.55 k 4.66% Community Snapshot Community Concerns Total Homelessness Camp -Private Property Tigard Street Parking Concerns: 87-90th SW Oak, 8810-8826 SW Spruce,SW Pfaffle,vehicle blocking bike paths& sidewalks Patrol Checks: Sunrise& Cook Park after hours juvenile activity Speeding: 3 complaints: 100th Street,Ascension,SW Hill Community Outreach and Events Total November Events:Monthly Landlord Forum (40),All Day Landlord Trair.Training(60) December Events: Downtown Tree Lighting, Christmas For Kids (250),Neighborhood Watch (15) Upcoming Events: Coffee w/Cop @ Well and Good Coffee Dec. 14 and I Can Do This! Dec. 16 *Person Crime-Assault,Homicide,Robbery,Kidnap,Forcible/Non-Forcible Sex Offense *Property Crimes-Arson,Bribery,Res Burglary,Bus Burglary,Oth Burglary,Forgery,Vandalism,Embezzle,Fraud,Theft,UUMV,Bad Check *Societal Crimes-Drug Offense,Prostitution,Weapons,Curfew,DisCon,DUII,Family Offense,Liqour Laws,Peeping Tom,Trespass 41 ----- -.---c40, Tigard PD Strategic Dashboard ---!-,-; 10 for November 2017 r-k 24- ::ir = 2 2016 Population Estimate: 51,253 (Adopted Budget FY 2017-2018) Calls For Service - 5 Year Trend TIGARD DISPATCHED TIGARD SELF INITIATED , ,,..,..... 21071 26088 7 • ,, .........23065 18116 18101----.." .012 201, 19963 19295 18606 ' ' 21347 20i 2010, -.._ 19476—.11443.--19645 2015 2016 F,....1.,1 , Response "fillies - 5 1 car Trend __ — PRIORITY 1-2 PRIORITY 3 f,12•••••••*.6,23..----*6.27 ,...... ,al— 9.53 - *------- 5.18......---.5.15----*--* i i I . 1 t 2015 .' .,. 201/ ' PRIORITY 4+ Priority 1= Priority 3 = Imminent threat to life Urgent call where crime 38.„........„10.3—.............,io 0,....—.....115 prevention is needed 9.......„..., ....." 9 1 I I 1 . , Priority 2 = Immediate threat to life, occuring now Priority 4+ =Cold crimes or public assistance 2012 /013 7014 2015 2010 .6: SUPPLEME�A .PACKET City Council Update Dec 2017 FOR Chamber Update . EETINC7, Leadership Tigard Business & Economy Day was held today, class toured Gerber, Agilyx, Fought Steel, learned about URD's, downtown development, key economic/business info on the Tigard and broader Portland Metro Economy. Good Morning Tigard (GMT),Thursday A.M. Networking 7:30 a.m.—Weekly 12/14/17— Hosted by ServPro of Tigard Tualatin at their location 12/21/17—No Host Networking @Tigard Chamber 12/28/17 - No Networking, Happy Holidays 1/4/18— Hosted by AccounTax of Oregon at their location Other • 12/13— Noon—Leverage and Learn— Educational How to's on using your Tigard Chamber member logo on your website, marketing materials and more,terms of use, etc. • 10 businesses have joined the chamber in the last 2 months • Sponsored first ever Downtown Tigard Small Business Saturday Details at http://business.tigardchamber.org/events/calendar/follow us on Twitter @tigardchamber Tigard Farmers Market Update We are beginning planning for our 2018 season. We welcome input from members of council and the community at large. Follow us on Facebook at tigardfarmersmarket and on Twitter @tigardfarmers TDA Downtown Updates • Small Business Saturday 11/25 we had 18 participating Downtown Tigard businesses, numerous community members visited businesses and filled out passports. Thanks to sponsor Tigard Chamber • Downtown Tigard Tree Lighting on 12/1 was a great success—We lit the Tree at Liberty Park, Pics with Santa and more was held at Ballroom Dance Company. Thanks to sponsors/supporters, TScandia, Symposium Coffee, McDonalds Tigard, "Santa & Mrs. Claus",The Ballroom Dance Company, City of Tigard Parks & Rec, Public Works and Tigard Police. • Several new businesses have opened or are coming to downtown—Sarah Jane's Insane Chicken food cart, Iron Warrior Fitness, Ultimate Dog, Stumptown Escape Games. New ownership at Tigard Liquor and Tigardville Station Find us on Facebook at expioredowntowntigard and at www.exploredowntowntigard.com. Follow us on Twitter @Tigarddowntown and on Instagram at downtowntigard { TDA Leadership Tigard w ;w f X()1 5 i))FA.GI'k. AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 D - CITIZEN COMMUNICATION DATE: December 12, 2017 (Limited to 2 minutes or less,please) The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda and items on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony becomes part of the public record The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. NAME,ADDRESS & PHONE TOPIC STAFF Please Print CONTACTED Name:dB120 oil �`'' -/- Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will "�� 46- / P help the presiding officer pronounce: //` 610e4r.) );;9e_ Address/2326 J,t J.. /PP' /7'�'z /�, 71a , 0 0 City AA fQ4 d State `'C% Zip 9.7223 Phone No. 97/-237-5---7W3 Name: Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Address City State Zip Phone No. Name: Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Address City State Zip Phone No. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION I:\ADM\CITY RECORDERS\000 City Recorder-Records Resources and Policies\CCSignup\citizen communication 171212.doc AIS-3369 3. A. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 12/12/2017 Length (in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: Receive and File: Council Calendar and Tentative Agenda Submitted By: Kelly Burgoyne, Central Services Item Type: Receive and File Meeting Type: Consent - Receive and File Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Receive and file the Council Calendar and the Tentative Agenda for future council meetings. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST No action is requested; these are for information purposes. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached are the Council Calendar and the Tentative agenda for future Council meetings. OTHER ALTERNATIVES N/A COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS N/A DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION N/A - Receive and File Items Attachments Three-Month Calendar Tentative Agenda III n • MEMORANDUM TIGARD TO: Honorable Mayor&City Council FROM: Kelly Burgoyne,Deputy City Recorder RE: Three-Month Council Calendar DATE: December 6,2017 Below is a listing of council meetings for the next three months. Regularly scheduled Council meetings are marked with an asterisk(*). December 5* Tuesday Council Business Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 12* Tuesday Council Business Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 19* Tuesday Council Workshop Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 26-* Tuesday Council Bu3incss Meeting 6:30 p.m.,Town Hall CANCELLED January 2* Tuesday Council Business Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 9* Tuesday Council Business Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 16* Tuesday Council Workshop Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 23* Tuesday Council Business Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall February 6* Tuesday Council Business Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 13*Tuesday Council Business Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 20* Tuesday Council Workshop Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 27* Tuesday Council Business Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall is\adm\city council\council calendar\3-month calendar word format.doc Meeting Banner 0 Business Meeting 0 Study Session I",; Special Meeting ❑� Consent Agenda 0 Meeting is Full Workshop Meeting 0 City Council Tentative Agenda 12/4/2017 4:24 PM - Updated Form Meeting Submitted Meeting Inbox or # Date By Type Title Department Finalized _ 3185 12/12/2017 Kelly Burgoyne AAA December 12, 2017 Business Meeting f I 3338 12/12/2017 Carol Krager ACCSTUDY 15 Minutes - Present Police Department Update to Police 11/27/2017 Council 3182 12/12/2017 Kelly Burgoyne ACCSTUDY 15 Minutes - Council Liaison Reports Central 06/15/2017 Services Total Time: 30 of 45 Minutes Scheduled 3289 12/12/2017 Doreen CCBSNS 1 5 Minutes - Appointment of Planning Commission Community 12/04/2017 Laughlin Members Development 3300 12/12/2017 Sean Farrelly CCBSNS 2 5 Minutes - Appoint Town Center Advisory Community Marty W, City Manager Commission Members Development 3277 12/12/2017 Kelly Burgoyne CCBSNS 3 40 Minutes - Levy and Bond Advisory Task Force City Zimmerman, E., Asst. City Discussion Management Mgr. 3225 12/12/2017 Susan Shanks CCBSNS 4 45 Minutes - Tigard Triangle Rezone Public Community Marty W, City Manager Hearing Development 3186 12/19/2017 Kelly Burgoyne AAA December 19, 2017 Workshop Meeting 3264 12/19/2017 Steve Martin CCWKSHOP 1 45 Minutes - Joint Meeting with the Park and Public Works Grass, M, Conf Exec Recreation Advisory Board Assistant 3283 12/19/2017 Carol Krager CCWKSHOP 2 30 Minutes - Joint Meeting with the Planning Community Marty W, City Manager Commission on Housing Issues Development 3260 12/19/2017 Kent Wyatt CCWKSHOP 3 40 Minutes - Receive Recommendations from the City Wyatt K, Management Task Force for the Homeless Management Analyst 3298 12/19/2017 Liz Lutz CCWKSHOP 4 30 Minutes - Discuss Social Service and Finance and Zimmerman, E, Asst. City Community Grant Process Information Mgr. Services 11 Page is\adm\city recorders\tentative agenda\december 4,2017.docx Meeting Banner 0 Business Meeting 0 Study Session D Special Meeting ❑■ Consent Agenda 0 Meeting is Full Workshop Meeting 0 City Council Tentative Agenda 12/4/2017 4:24 PM - Updated 3297 12/19/2017 Liz Lutz CCWKSHOP 5 30 Minutes - 5 Year Plan for Transient Lodging Finance and LaFrance T, Fin/Info Svcs Tax Information Director Services Total Time: 175 of 180 Minutes Sc FULl 3187 12/26/2017 Kelly Burgoyne AAA December 26, 2017 Business Meeting - MEETING CANCELLED 3307 01/02/2018 Kelly Burgoyne AAA January 02, 2018 Business Meeting 3346 01/02/2017 Kelly Burgoyne CCBSNS 1 10 Minutes - LCRB Placeholder Finance and Barrett J, Sr Mgmt Analyst Information Services Total Time: 10 of 180 Minutes 3308 01/09/2018 Kelly Burgoyne AAA January 09, 2018 Business Meeting 3341 01/09/2018 John Goodrich ACCSTUDY 10 Minutes - Adoption of Lake Oswego-Tigard Water Public Works Goodrich J, Division Manager Treatment Plant Operations Plan 3344 01/09/2018 John Goodrich ACCSTUDY 15 Minutes - Proposed Lake Oswego-Tigard Water Public Works Goodrich 3, Division Manager Partnership Remaining Property Buy-in Total Time: 25 Minutes of 45 Minutes Scheduled 3305 01/09/2018 Kelly Burgoyne CCBSNS 1 5 Minutes - Appoint Tigard Transportation Community Brown, B, Assoc Transp Advisory Committee Members Development Planner 3347 01/09/2017 Kelly Burgoyne CCBSNS 2 10 Minutes - LCRB Placeholder Finance and Barrett 3, Sr Mgmt Analyst Information Services 3342 01/09/2017 Kent Wyatt CCBSNS 3 20 Minutes - Discuss the City's 2017 Federal and City Wyatt K, Management State Legislative Priorities Management Analyst 3276 01/09/2017 Dana Bennett CCBSNS 4 45 Minutes - Executive Session Called under City 11/13/2017 192.660(i) City Manager Evaluation Management (end of meeting) 2IPage is\adm\city recorders tentative agenda\december 4,2017.docx Meeting Banner 0 Business Meeting 0 Study Session 0 Special Meeting Q■ Consent Agenda 0 Meeting is Full Workshop Meeting 0 City Council Tentative Agenda 12/4/2017 4:24 PM- Updated 3366 01/09/2017 Joanne CCBSNS 5 25 Minutes - Council Goal Review and Discussion City Marty W, City Manager Bengtson for 2018 Management es - M , . 3309 01/16/2018 Kelly Burgoyne AAA January 16, 2018 Workshop Meeting 3272 01/16/2018 Liz Lutz CCWKSHOP 1 45 Minutes - Second Quarter Budget Committee Finance and Kang S, Senior Management. Meeting Information Analyst Services 3302 01/16/2018 Schuyler CCWKSHOP 3 20 Minutes - Development Code Policy and Community Warren S, Associate Planner Warren Procedures Phase II Update Development 333501/16/2018 Marissa Grass CCWKSHOP 4 30 Minutes - Update on Stormwater Master Plan Public Works Faha L, City Engineer 41111.111111111.111111111111111 1 Time: 95 of 180 Minutes Scheduled - MEETING CLOSED 3310 01/23/2018 Kelly Burgoyne AAA January 23, 2018 Business Meeting Mayor Cook Absent 3339 01/23/2017 John Goodrich ACCSTUDY 20 Minutes - Willamette Water Supply Project Public Works Goodrich J, Division Manager Intake Structure Allocation Proposed Agreements Total Time: 20 of 45 Minutes Scheduled 3228 01/23/2018 John Goodrich CCBSNS 1 10 Minutes - Willamette Water Supply Project Public Works Goodrich J, Division Manager Intake Structure Allocation Proposed Agreements 3340 01/23/2018 John Goodrich CCBSNS 2 15 Minutes - Adoption of Lake Oswego - Tigard Public Works Goodrich J, Division Manager Water Treatment Plan Operation Plan 2920 01/23/2018 John Goodrich CCBSNS 3 10 Minutes - Willamette Water Supply Project Public Works Goodrich J, Division Manager Intake Structure Allocation 3343 01/23/2018 Kent Wyatt CCSBSNS 4 15 Minutes - Finalize the 2017 Federal and State City Wyatt K, Management Legislative Agenda Management Analyst 3345 01/23/2018 Steve Kang 'CCBSNS 5 20 Minutes - Informational Public Hearing to Finance and Kang S, Senior Management Consider Approval of Resolution for the FY2018 Information Analyst Second Quarter Supplemental Budget Services - 3 I Page is\adm\city recorders\tentative agenda\december 4,2017.docx Meeting Banner 0 Business Meeting 0 Study Session Special Meeting ❑■ Consent Agenda 0 Meeting is Full Workshop Meeting 0 City Council Tentative Agenda 12/4/2017 4:24 PM - Updated 02/06/2018 Kelly Burgoyne AAA February 06, 2018 Business One Meeting Finance and Barrett 3, Sr Mgmt 02/06/2018 Kelly Burgoyne CCBSONE 1 10 Minutes - LCRB - Placeholder Information Analyst Services Total Time: 10 Minutes of 180 Minutes Scheduled 02/13/2018 Kelly Burgoyne AAA February 13, 2018 Business Meeting Finance and 02/13/2018 Kelly Burgoyne CCBSNS 1 10 Minutes - LCRB - Placeholder Information Barrett J, Sr Mgmt Analyst Services 02/13/2018 John Goodrich CCBSNS 2 15 Minutes - Willamette Water Supply Project Public Works Goodrich J, Division Intake Structure Allocation Proposed Agreement Manager Total Time: 25 Minutes of 100 Minutes Scheduled 02/20/2018 Kelly Burgoyne AAA February 20, 2018 Workshop Meeting 02/27/2018 Kelly Burgoyne AAA February 27, 2018 Business Meeting 02/27/2018 Marissa Grass CCBSNS 1 20 Minutes - Consider a Resolution to Adopt the Public Faha L, City Engineer Stormwater Master Plan Works Finance and 02/27/2018 Kelly Burgoyne CCBSNS 2 10 Minutes - LCRB - Placeholder Information Barrett J, Sr Mgmt Analyst Services Total Time: 30 Minutes of 100 Minutes Scheduled Council Confirmed Travel&Vacation Dates: Eric Zimmerman December 5-10 (DC) Mayor Cook December 7-8 (USCM H2O Conference—Napa) Marty Wine December 21-28 (Vacation) Mayor Cook January 23-26 (US Conference of Mayors) Marty Wine January 24—February 3 (Vacation) 4 I Page is\adm\city recorders tentative agenda\december 4,2017.docx AIS-3289 4. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 12/12/2017 Length (in minutes): 5 Minutes Agenda Title: Appointment of Planning Commission Members Prepared For: Tom McGuire, Community Development Submitted By: Doreen Laughlin, Community Development Item Type: Resolution Meeting Type: Council Business Meeting - Main Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Shall Council appoint John C. Roberts and Jan Lambert as voting members of the Tigard Planning Commission, and appoint Melanie Brook and Cole Whitehurst as non-voting alternate members? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Approve a resolution that appoints John C. Roberts and Jan Lambert as voting members of the Tigard Planning Commission with terms that will expire December 31, 2021; and appoints Melanie Brook and Cole Whitehurst as alternate non-voting members with terms that will expire December 31, 2019. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY There are two open voting positions and two open non-voting positions on the Planning Commission. One voting position was vacated by Commissioner Aaron Fahr earlier this year. Commissioner Brian McDowell was appointed in 2016 to fill a vacated voting term that had two years left and is due to expire December 31, 2017; Commissioner McDowell is eligible for reappointment; however, is not applying at this time. Commissioner Tom Mooney has termed out after having served two 2-year terms as an alternate commissioner. John C. Roberts,Jan Lambert, Melanie Brook, and Cole Whitehurst applied for positions and were interviewed by the Mayor's Advisory Committee on November 27, 2017. Attachment 1 is a Resolution implementing these recommended appointees. Attachment 2 has biographical information on all recommended appointees. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Council could decide to not approve some or all of the recommendations; this would result in a need to reopen the recruitment. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS City of Tigard Vision Task Force: "The City will maximize the effectiveness of the volunteer spirit to accomplish the greatest good for our community." DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION N/A Attachments Resolution Biographical Information CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 17- A RESOLUTION APPOINTING JOHN C. ROBERTS AND JAN LAMBERT AS VOTING MEMBERS OF THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION,AND APPOINTING MELANIE BROOK AND COLE WHITEHURST AS AL lERNA'1'E,NON-VOTING MEMBERS. WHEREAS,there are two vacancies for voting members and two vacancies for alternate non-voting members on the Planning Commission;and WHEREAS,John C. Roberts,Jan Lambert,Melanie Brook, and Cole Whitehurst applied for appointments to the Planning Commission;and WHEREAS, the Mayor's Appointment Advisory Committee recommends that Council appoint John C. Roberts and Jan Lambert as voting members with terms that will expire December 31,2021;and WHEREAS, the Mayor's Appointment Advisory Committee recommends that Council appoint Melanie Brook and Cole Whitehurst as alternate non-voting members for terms that will expire December 31,2019. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: John C. Roberts and Jan Lambert are appointed to the Planning Commission as voting members to fill terms that will expire December 31,2021. SECTION 2: Melanie Brook and Cole Whitehurst are appointed to the Planning Commission as alternate members to fill terms that will expire December 31,2019. SECTION 3: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This day of 2017. Mayor-City of Tigard A I"TEST: City Recorder-City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 17- Page 1 Attachment 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPOINTEES BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION On December 12,2017,Tigard City Council will consider a Resolution to appoint John C. Roberts and Jan Lambert as voting members of the Tigard Planning Commission, and to appoint Melanie Brook and Cole Whitehurst as non-voting alternate members. John C. Roberts has been a resident of Tigard for over 20 years. He lived in Portland for 12 years and grew up in Los Angeles.John has worked for Intel since 1990. He is currently an HR Manager, supports Intel Finance, assists with M&A's, and is a certified Leadership Coach. He has many years of experience in IT, Finance, and Accounting.John holds an MBA in Organizational Development from the University of California, Los Angeles. He is a steering committee member on Washington County's CPO4B, and has volunteered for twelve years on multiple advisory councils at Doernbecher Children's Hospital. Jan Lambert has lived in Tigard for over 10 years. She previously lived in Lake Oswego, and grew up in Redding, California. She works for Providence St.Joseph Health as a Senior Compensation Consultant in Human Resources.Jan is on the Columbia Willamette Compensation Group Board of Directors and is a Commissioner on the Multnomah County Elected Officials Commission. She holds a Bachelor of Arts Degree in History and several Human Resource certifications (SPHR, CCP and GRP).Jan has served on boards throughout her adult life and looks forward to being a positive influence on her community right here in Tigard by serving on the Planning Commission. Melanie Brook moved to Tigard from Lake Oswego five months ago. She grew up in Placerville, California then moved to Utah for school. Melanie holds a Bachelor of Arts Degree in Public Relations and Business Management from BYU. After graduation, she moved to Oregon. Currently,Melanie works full time as an Event Manager at Revelry Agency in downtown Portland and coordinates weddings part-time for Bridal Bliss in Lake Oswego. Melanie volunteered as a Blood Drive Coordinator for the Marshall Community Blood Center for four years and later served on a fundraising team for the Red Cross, to coordinate a "Run for Red 5k." Cole Whitehurst has lived in Tigard for three years and grew up in Portland. He works for Multnomah County as an industrial appraiser and has additional experience in commercial and residential appraisals. He has a strong understanding and application of land use, zoning, valuation concepts, Oregon tax and real estate laws. He attended George Fox University through the Act Six Scholarship program and played on the basketball team. Cole is presently the Vice President of the local International Association of Assessing Officers (IAAO) chapter,Vice-President of his homeowners association, and volunteers for Habitat for Humanity. AIS-3300 5. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 12/12/2017 Length (in minutes): 5 Minutes Agenda Title: Appoint Town Center Advisory Commission Members Submitted By: Sean Farrelly, Community Development Item Type: Resolution Meeting Type: Council Business Meeting - Main Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Appoint Town Center Advisory Commission Members STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends approval of a resolution appointing Faez Soud, Ralph Hancock, Ryan Ruggiero, and Thomas Murphy as voting members, and appointing Lucas Brook and Kelsey Parpart as non-voting alternate members of the Town Center Advisory Commission. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The Town Center Advisory Commission (TCAC) is the advisory body to the Town Center Development Agency on urban renewal issues. The Town Center Advisory Commission currently has three voting resident positions with terms that expire on December 31, 2020, and two voting business representative positions with terms expiring December 31, 2020. There are also up to two non-voting alternate positions and up to two non-voting Ex Officio positions with terms that expire on December 31, 2018. Applicants were interviewed On November 29, 2017 by the Mayor's Appointment Advisory Committee. The Committee recommended that Faez Soud, Ralph Hancock, Ryan Ruggiero and Thomas Murphy be appointed as voting members to fill terms that expire December 31, 2020 and that Lucas Brook and Kelsey Parpart be appointed as non-voting alternate members to fill terms that will expire December 31, 2018. Attachment 1 is a Resolution appointing the recommended candidates. Attachment 2 has biographical information on all six recommended appointees. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Council could decide to not approve some, or all, of the recommendations. This would necessitate reopening the recruitment. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS Not applicable DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Not applicable Attachments Resolution TCAC Bios CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 17 — A RESOLUTION APPOINTING FAEZ SOLD, RALPH HANCOCK, RYAN RUGGIERO, AND THOMAS MURPHY AS VOTING MEMBERS OF THE TOWN CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION AND LUCAS BROOK AND KELSEY PARPART AS NON-VOTING ALTERNA 1'E MEMBERS. WHEREAS, there currently exists five vacancies for voting members, up to two vacancies for non-voting alternate members and up to two non-voting ex officio members of the Town Center Advisory Commission; and WHEREAS, the Mayor's Appointment Advisory Committee recommends that Council appoint Faez Soud, Ralph Hancock,Ryan Ruggiero,and Thomas Murphy as voting members;and WHEREAS, the Mayor's Appointment Advisory Committee recommends that Council appoint Lucas Brook and Kelsey Parpart as non-voting members. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: Faez Soud,Ralph Hancock,Ryan Ruggiero and Thomas Murphy, are appointed as voting members to fill terms that expire December 31,2020. SECTION 2: Lucas Brook and Kelsey Parpart are appointed as non-voting members to fill terms that will expire December 31,2018. SECTION 3: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This day of 2017. Mayor-City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder-City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 17- Page 1 TOWN CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPOINTEES BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION On December 12, 2017, the Tigard City Council will consider a Resolution to appoint Faez Soud, Ralph Hancock, Ryan Ruggiero, and Thomas Murphy as voting members and appoint Lucas Brook and Kelsey Parpart as non-voting alternate members of the Town Center Advisory Commission. Lucas Brook recently moved to Tigard and works as a Corporate Strategist for Precoa, LLC in the Tigard Triangle. He has volunteered with the Lake Oswego Advisory Board and as a youth volleyball coach. Ralph "Scott" Hancock works for PCC Sylvania and is a 25-year veteran of the U.S. Navy. He has lived in Tigard for twelve years and has previously volunteered with the Tigard Triangle Citizen Advisory Committee and the Tigard Library Board. Thomas Murphy is an attorney for Scott-Hookland LLP in Downtown Tigard. He is a twenty-three year resident of Tigard. He previously served on the City Center Advisory Commission from 2008-2014, including terms as chair and vice chair. He is also on the executive committee for Community Partners for Affordable Housing. Kelsey Parpart recently moved to Tigard and works as a marketer for AKS Engineering and Forestry. She is a member of the Society for Marketing Professionals and has previously volunteered on a parks advisory committee in Anchorage,Alaska. Ryan Ruggiero works in park acquisition for Metro. He has lived in Tigard for two years. He has volunteered as a lacrosse coach and is a member of the Lands Committee of the Wetlands Conservancy. Faez Soud is a Senior Construction Coordinator for the Portland Housing Bureau. He has been a resident of Tigard for seventeen years. He has previously volunteered with the Portland Housing Advisory Committee. AGENDA ITEM No. 6 Date: December 12, 2017 TESTIMONY SIGN-UP SHEETS Please sign on the following page(s) if you wish to testify before City Council on: LEVY AND BOND AVISORY TASK FORCE DISCUSSION This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony become part of the public record and is openly available to all members of the public. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. Due to Time Constraints City Council May Impose A Time Limit on Testimony AGENDA ITEM No. 6 Date: December 12, 2017 PLEASE PRINT This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony become part of the public record and is openly available to all members of the public. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. Proponent—(Speaking In Favor) Opponent—(Speaking Against) Neutral Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&P•one No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Addres &PI4 No. Name,Address&Phone No. c\--) Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Add.-ss&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. AIS-3277 6. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 12/12/2017 Length (in minutes): 40 Minutes Agenda Title: Levy and Bond Advisory Task Force Discussion Prepared For: Eric Zimmerman Submitted By: Kelly Burgoyne, Central Services Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Meeting Type: Council Staff Business Meeting - Main Public Hearing No Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE The Levy and Bond Task Force will present recommendations to the City Council on the questions of: 1) Should the city pursue a local option levy with the voters of Tigard? 2) What should a local option levy be used for in the City of Tigard? 3) If the city chooses to refer a local option levy to voters, at what rate per thousand should the city consider? The LBTF unanimously supported the city pursuing a local option levy at this time, in a range between $1.00/thousand to $1.50/thousand of assessed value. The task force will provide a presentation of these recommendations to council and provide insight about their decision and their priorities. Common themes for the use of levy funds are increased or improved sidewalks, police and public safety, and parks maintenance and improvements. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST No action needed at this time. This is a report from a task force of community members. Council can ask staff to further develop work based upon recommendations of LBTF or additional council input. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The Levy and Bond Task Force was formed in the summer of 2017, consisting of 17 members of the Tigard community. The City of Tigard faces financial difficulty maintaining current city services given the current revenue and expense forecasts. The Levy and Bond Task Force (LBTF) reviewed Tigard's financial situation, including forecasts, expenses, revenues, and tax structures. They considered options to correct the concerns about revenue and expenses, as well as the impact cuts or improvements could have upon the community. The LBTF was supported in its work by city staff who facilitated meetings, researched questions, provided background information, and provided clarity on issues concerning task force members. The recommendations by the LBTF are independent conclusions by a body of the community. Council-President Snider serves as the council liaison to the task force. OTHER ALTERNATIVES COUNCIL OR CCDA GOALS, POLICIES, MASTER PLANS DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION This is the first report to council of the Levy and Bond Task Force. Attachments Presentation CITY OF TIGARD Respect and Care I Do the Right Thing I Get it Done III TIGARD Tigard Levy and Bond Advisory Task Force Recommendation City Council I December 12,2017 C I "1' O 1' 1' 1 G A R D Overview of Task Force Role and Schedule Task Force Meetings Should the City pursue (Operating Levy) operating levy July 20, 2017 an o p g Meeting #1 and/or a facilities bond Getting Started Thursday, August 17 to improve service? If Meeting #2 Understanding City Finances yes, when and how Thursday, September 21 much ? Meeting #3 Community Priorities Thursday, October 19 Meeting #4 Public Engagement Thursday, November 16 January-May 2018: Task Force will work Meeting #5 on facilities (general obligation) bond. Task Force Recommendation CITY OF TIGARD Task Force Members Alan Miles Holly Koontz Angela Anastasakis Jamie Watson Carl Switzer Jeff Croke Cathy Olson (Committee for Community Kate Rogers Engagement) Melody Graeber Chris Middaugh (Planning Commission) Mitch Friedman Christopher Staggs Robert Van Vlack (Transportation Clifford Rone (Budget Committee) Advisory Committee) Darlene Dick Wayne Gross (Parks & Recreation Erin Scheller Advisory Board) ( I I 1 ( ) Il I ( \ I I ) Funding Scenarios Considered More revenue is needed to keep 1. Get Worse up with current service levels. (no additional resources) 2. Continue to Provide $6M Gap Good Service I Revenues (requires new resources, $1.00/thousand) 3. Get Better (requires new resources, $1.50/thousand) 1 2 3 4 5 Years r Y O l' 1 (; \. R D Questions Considered Should the city pursue a local option levy with the voters of Tigard? What should a local option levy be used for in the City of Tigard? If the city chooses to refer a local option levy to voters, at what rate per thousand should the city consider? CITY 01, 1 I ( , 1 R U Task Force Recommendation Yes—Levy (unanimous support from task force members) The top three services / Sidewalks / Park maintenance / Police Recommended increases between Scenarios 2 and 3 ($1.25 to $1.50) ► Mechanism for accountability $ ; 1' Y OF TIGARD Task Force Comments Why invest? What on? Timing, why now? ► Personal reason for supporting a levy and what size CITY OF TIG \ R I) Staff Next Steps and Recommendations Council may provide direction: Set up individual meetings to gather feedback and input from councilors Staff develops proposed levy packages or not Share levy proposals with council Develop a timeline for referral City Council Meeting 12/12/17 Absentee Comments for Levy and Bond Task Force Discussion - Clifford Rone The Tigard City Council is to be commended for attempting to address a need that has been building for a number of years. Measures 5, 47 and 50 established structural limitations on how much a city (along with many other taxing entities) can raise through annual property tax assessments. These structural limitations cap the increase in assessment at 3% on the tax base with other formulaic provisions the prevent the tax base from keeping pace with actual property values. This has caused the revenue line to sink below expenses going forward and put the City in a position of deciding which services the citizens have requested and enjoyed will no longer be provided, or provided at a greatly-reduced level. Putting into place the Levy and Bond Task Force created an excellent mechanism for Tigard citizens to understand what the issues are, and some of the limited options for keeping the City moving toward its goals(stated on the City website and reviewed periodically at Council meetings, and various committee meetings). Having been on the City's Budget Committee for the last six years, all the members of this Task Force are to be commended for absorbing a huge amount of historical information and learning how the City got to this point. They now understand further, that the City Council has done an excellent job for many years of maintaining City services with dwindling resources without prematurely "crying wolf" to the citizens and asking for substantial changes.These needs can clearly be seen by those choosing to look at the budget (on the website) and in the exhibits, where looming backlogs have been identified. Those backlogs (parks and street maintenance for example) will start to be seen very soon by all the citizens as hard choices need to be made in where the reduced resources are allocated this coming budget year and following. If additional revenue is not generated through a local option levy, which is fundamentally the only real source left to the City, the choices will be to reduce services and expenses in most, if not all areas funded from the General Fund. Choices will have to be made regarding full funding for the library, adding police staff to get back to the recommended service levels of 2008, or fixing broken water pipes in the parks and potholes in the streets and finishing out the "walkability goals" so many citizens have embraced,just to mention a few. Based on my experiences and understanding of where the City is, I fully support the recommendations being made to you this evening by this Task Force. They have been sincere in their efforts, questions, and opinions and the City should be grateful for their commitment to this process Clifford Rone Tigard resident since 1984 q c 5'Jo D4 -7 / 6 Key question Key considerations what are the metrics? How many metrics are used per person/department/company? SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET Are they aligned to the o donizaiion's strategic and business objectives? T® id/2- - �/a / .Ate they formai or informa;? 1i� R ��y.�/ pper� �7(�Q Are they within the employers direct control? (DATE OF MEETING Are they auo opriate for the job position? ` [ m.ke/. lA C2)da- A-a they easy cr difficult to obtain? Are there pressures within the organization to meet the metric? Who estaolishes the metric? Did the organization include rottorn-uc ineut in establishing these metros? Did the learn escat:ilshing_!-gem understand wrietner the metrics were achievable? Cid the team c.,nsider the impact of a.cusiness unit's or funct'ion's metric-;on other business ostivities along the end-to-end pro:ess? How is performance reported? s toe performance reported independently(e.g.,system generated)or self-reported? Can the measures be objectively or independently verified? What oversight is performed? Wo;performs the review?How frequently is it performed? Are there policies around understanding performance outliers? Does management monitor and take action when metrics do no:produce the desired outcome or wrier the,/nave unintended consequences on other aspects of the uperattor? Our full report(http://www,ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Metrics-Matter/$FILE/EY-Metrics- Matter.pdf) provides more details about how IA can help your organization assess performance management. -k 4 `e't 5 r 1' ✓'�� l-J-e:;,:. ,G_' 4-1-. . ec.__. 6 C.:-.1-'-'7". i c-‘e.VA"‘t ts,'Li 5 4;7761-J , `r, to u l 14.=-1, ��-',,t 4.r1 c els 2<- of p 14 124 tel e_ �" � 1� i I ' -- ., /7 f 4'•t i A/,`c i -= C N 6 � ----k t-- c. v, -r ei.4 c.t- t.v/ l -- -4� Tit-(-,.. 4,k c t ,,,l_ �,� c.i 47_ 4 L_ f, Ke rL( s t f �, viOit7 `i ,)c- L ; �, / 0`" c_ 3 1 ; z t l cz:--�.. ,L - J --- 1 t (2-CC'S 1 At-I i [ 7 / `" E' / C) �-15 I-12111 ,, Internal Audit: assessing performance measurement with metrics Through the years, organizations have developed and implemented a variety of metrics to drive employee behavior. Internal Audit(IA)should help the organization not only by evaluating the processes and controls surrounding these metrics, but also by taking the natural next step and evaluating the metrics themselves. IA should use its unique knowledge of the enterprise to offer sharp insights that can directly impact the organization and its objectives. It should move beyond business process to business .per.ixicuance. Internal Audit has the knowledge and experience to effectively evaluate metrics and their impacts. LA,taatte.- 1 A pEK rovk IA can identify high-risk areas, evaluate the metrics in use, and offer recommendations to management on the design of metrics that will drive the desired behavior. IA has the knowledge and experience to provide a cost-effective evaluation that can bring significant value to the organization. Here are some critical questions IA should be asking when it comes to metrics: p Lie /)‘.; tirU . 0P i3 ez4 #1 2-5 C.) ii41,c- 4 izh5 P.,<?) rt, be LA-7i14 JA PZ.6 < # Pit:.•.; c:c. 1.)%.4)1. v., 3 r4 ,& p4 e) • TS l: zii°'s _`f Without resolving to increase resources, the services that residents tell us they value will be at risk. Tigard continues to face a structural financial imbalance in which city expenditures grow slightly faster than our resources grow,even with the actions that we have taken to manage the growth in our costs. Although we are careful stewards of the funds the citizens entrust to the city,Tigard has reached a point where our programs and services cannot keep up with demand,and services cannot be added or expanded without additional resources. Most city depattments have not spent dollars budgeted for materials and services electing instead to create staff positions to provide services to keep up with the demand for existing services. Even with these "trades," city staffing has only recovered to 2008 staffing levels. With these findings,Tigard is committed to embark on community education and to convene a citizen committee to review what the city has done to manage its finances, and understand and advise what might gain support if the city was more effective communicating about the services that could be at risk if our budget situation continues unchanged. Fundamental Questions rr 1.3�1-14-4,.v = i>.t. 1.1 A....f ..;1" C.tt mac, 7) The Task Force is asked to advise the Council on the following threetundament� questions: /)\-- ; 1. What is the current state of the city's financial situation, service provision, and facilities? 2. Should the City seek additional resources for its services in the form of a voter-approved local option property tax levy (for operations) or a bond measure (for facilities)? 3. (if yes)What city services/facilities should a levy and bond support? (if no)what are the priorities for services and facilities? • What communication and education will help the community understand and support increased property taxes for services they value? • Explore the development of a bond issue for city facilities,including timing,phasing, and financial issues. MembershipTO A"r' ..t.:(...,--1TitaE (Qu.c4-f"t—23 A,-4et a ireS 4ti a&-1- 'Titi✓ 1/1e--,d • PP'C)'‘.::( 'A",5 r-tip{r er[..-1 €; K ne- ..1..�(c� The task force will be a mix of 18 individuals who possess varying degrees of knowledge about city•-rM.gE;, 0,¢ funding and the community. Membership will also be a mix of individuals who have volunteered R,1i .1.%cs4. previously with the City of Tigard and those who have not.The intent is to form a task force that .,L 1 P.t1-c:-1+..- c represents the wide-ranging interests and background of the Tigard community. > C-Z.tAt `f`�lf.""~t"t-tax„ The city will invite members of the Tigard community to apply by extending an invitation to current A-v e=( -ti-, city board and commission members and also from the general public through the website and social media. Term The Task Force's work will focus first on the local option levy question,with five meetings monthly from July through October 2017; and then focus on the feasibility of a facilities bond,beginning in October 2017 through April 2018.Timing is based on Council decision making to place a matter before voters at a future election. Responsibilities Councilor Wilson said he could attest to the fact that Tigard residents were there at the tree lipting in Portland. He said, "They are asking for public testimony and we are members of the public so I don't see any problem with that." Mayor Dirksen said he heard a general consensus around the table to move forward with at least considering this. He directed staff to come up with some language Council could consider at their next meeting. 2. BUDGET COMMITTEE MEETING 0 Finance and Information Services Director LaFrance introduced two new Budget Committee members: Councilor Woodard and alternate member Melody Graeber. New regular member Christopher Henn was unable to attend tonight. Also present were citizen Budget Committee members Cameron James,Rick Parker and Dan Goodrich. Other members present were Council President Buchner, Councilor Henderson, Councilor Wilson,Mayor Dirksen and City Manager Prosser. Finance and Information Services Director LaFrance outlined what he wanted to cover in the meeting. o The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report(CAFR) o Second quarterly financial report o Initial General Fund forecast and budget instructions given to City departments o Presentation recently given to the bond rating agencies The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report(CAFR) Assistant Finance Director Smith-Wager distributed to Budget Committee members a copy of the 2010 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) and led a discussion on the purpose of a CAFR and the status of the audit. She said the City was audited by Grove, Mueller and Swank. She said auditors provide reasonable assurance that the financial statements are not materially misstated. She discussed state requirements audits must cover including banking at specific banks, Oregon Budget Law, insurance coverage, public contracting laws,and that restricted funds (such as the Gas Tax Fund) are being spent in compliance with State laws. Internal controls are documented and tested. Assistant Finance Director Smith-Wager said City was notified in September that Tigard received the Government Finance Officer's Certificate of Achievement for Financial Reporting, for the twenty-fifth consecutive year. Mayor Dirksen noted that while the financial audit is not a performance audit, the City has solicited performance audits of most primary departments,such as Police and library,in the past several years. ity Manager Prosser said there was also a management review of the engineering function which led to reorganization. Council President Buehner asked if the City would be doing any other performance audits in e upcoming fiscal year. City Manager Prosser said funds were looking a little tight so he did not know.Mayor Dirksen asked which departments had not had an audit recently and suggested the Public Works Department may be due. City Manager Prosser agreed that it would be the most appropriate department to look at next. Second quarterly financial report Council President Buchner commented that the Finance Department had to cut off the first quarter early for their first quarterly report, and asked if they had to do that again for the second quarter report. Finance and Information Services Director LaFrance said they had less than a week to prepare; the timeline will always be short. He noted that it was questioned last time whether staff should keep them on the schedule or allow time for extensive analysis? He said this high-level document is self-explanatory but the extra report requested by the TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 18,2011 City of Tigard 1312S SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 y www.tigar.-. AGENDA ITEM No. 7 Date: December 12, 2017 TESTIMONY SIGN-UP SHEETS Please sign on the following page(s) if you wish to testify before City Council on: Legislative Public Hearing — T I GARD TRIANGLE LEAN CODE PHASE II This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony become part of the public record and is openly available to all members of the public. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. Due to Time Constraints City Council May Impose A Time Limit on Testimony AGENDA ITEM No. 7 Date: December 12, 2017 PLEASE PRINT This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony become part of the public record and is openly available to all members of the public. The names and addresses ofpersons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. Proponent—(Speaking In Favor) Opponent—(Speaking Against) Neutral Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. f Name,Address&Phone No. am, Addr, &P one No. Name,Address&Phone No. I Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. AIS-3225 7. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 12/12/2017 Length (in minutes): 45 Minutes Agenda Title: Tigard Triangle Lean Code Phase II Public Hearing Prepared For: Susan Shanks, Community Development Submitted By: Susan Shanks, Community Development Item Type: Ordinance Meeting Type: Council Public Hearing - Legislative Business Meeting - Main Public Hearing: Yes Publication Date: 11/15/2017 Information ISSUE Shall the City Council approve a package of legislative amendments specific to the Tigard Triangle and Downtown Tigard that rezones the Triangle, updates the Transportation System Plan, and overhauls the sign regulations for the Triangle and Downtown? This package of amendments is collectively known as the Tigard Triangle Lean Code Phase II amendments and includes a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA2017-00002), Zoning Map Amendment (ZON2017-00002), and Development Code Amendment (DCA2017-00004). STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends approval of the attached Ordinance (Attachment 6) that amends the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Map, and Community Development Code. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY City staff is proposing three kinds of amendments. All of the amendments relate to the area known as the Tigard Triangle. The third amendment also relates to signage in Downtown Tigard. The three amendments, collectively known as the Tigard Triangle Lean Code Phase II amendments, are as follows: 1. Map amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map to rezone portions of the Triangle from General Commercial (C-G) and Mixed-Used Employment (MUE) to Triangle Mixed-Use (TMU) to complete the implementation of the recently adopted Lean Code. 2. Map and text amendments to the Transportation System Plan, which is an ancillary Comprehensive Plan document, to make it consistent with the transportation network recently adopted in the Lean Code and to satisfy state transportation mitigation requirements for rezoning the Triangle. 3. Map and text amendments to the Tigard Community Development Code for Chapters 18.435 (Signs), 18.650 (Downtown Tigard Plan District), and 18.660 (Tigard Triangle Plan District) to make the sign regulations for the Triangle and Downtown more pedestrian-oriented and to update the types of signs and building elements that may project into the right-of-way in these two areas. The proposed amendments are part of a multi-year and multi-pronged city effort to transform the Tigard Triangle and Downtown Tigard into active, urban, multimodal, and mixed-use districts. The city's most recent effort in this regard culminated in Council's adoption of the Tigard Triangle Lean Code in August 2017. The main goal of the Lean Code is to spur development in the Triangle by reducing regulations in ways that support the community's vision for a more walkable and connected place. The Lean Code, however, will not go into effect until Council adopts specific amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Map, Zoning Map, and Transportation System Plan to rezone the Triangle. These specific amendments are a key part of this proposal. The Tigard Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed package of legislative amendments in November 2017, unanimously recommending that City Council approve an Ordinance adopting the proposed amendments as determined through the public hearing process. The Planning Commission's recommendation is included as Attachment 1. The full set of attachments for Council's consideration is as follows: •Attachment 1: Planning Commission Recommendation Memo •Attachment 2: Proposed Amendments •Attachment 3: Proposed Amendments (Sign Code Summary) •Attachment 4: Proposed Staff Modifications to Address Public Comments •Attachment 5: Public Comments •Attachment 6: Ordinance and Exhibits (including Findings and Conclusions) Project History The Tigard Triangle is located in the northeast corner of the city and is roughly 500 acres in size. Its triangular shape is the result of the three state highways that surround it, namely OR 99W, OR 217, and Interstate 5. The long range land use and development vision for the Tigard Triangle is outlined in the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and further defined in the recently completed Tigard Triangle Strategic Plan (TT Strategic Plan). The latter was developed with extensive public engagement and technical analysis in 2015. The TT Strategic Plan identified a number of implementation strategies to achieve the vision. One involved the creation of new development standards and procedures, and the other involved rezoning a large portion of the area. The first implementation strategy was achieved with the adoption of the Tigard Triangle Lean Code in August 2017. The second is underway and is a key part of this proposal. Downtown Tigard is adjacent to the Triangle. These areas have their own building and site design standards, but they are more similar than different. Both areas are planned for higher-density, mixed-use, and pedestrian-oriented development and, together, are designated by Metro as a regional Town Center. Both areas also have outdated sign regulations that are inconsistent with adopted goals and plans. Proposal Description The proposal rezones the Triangle, updates the Transportation System Plan, and amends the Community Development Code in the following ways. The entire proposal is included as Attachment 2. 1. Comprehensive and Zoning Map Amendments — Tigard Triangle a. Changes the land use and zoning designations for all properties (totaling 150.33 acres) zoned MUE to TMU. b. Changes the land use and zoning designations for 27 properties (totaling 68.19 acres) zoned C-G to TMU. [The TMU zone is a new zone that was created through the adoption of the Lean Code in August 2017. This new zone will be applied only upon adoption of the proposed map amendments.] 2. Transportation System Plan (TSP) Map and Text Amendments —Tigard Triangle and Hunziker Industrial Core Area a. Updates text to reflect recently adopted plans and policies. b. Updates project list to reflect recently adopted plans and policies and new mitigation projects identified in the required Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) analysis for the proposed rezoning of the properties identified in #1 above. c. Updates 9 maps to reflect recently adopted plans and policies and new mitigation projects. Amendments to Figures 5-2 and 5-12 were limited to the Tigard Triangle area only. Amendments to Figures 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 5-9, 5-10, and 5-11 were limited to adding a reference to see Figure 5-12 for updated Tigard Triangle project information. d. Updates project list and relevant maps to reflect the Wall Street extension to Tech Center Drive consistent with the city's adopted economic development initiatives for the Hunziker Industrial Core Area. 3. Community Development Code Map and Text Amendments —Tigard Triangle and Downtown Tigard a. Amends Chapter 18.435 (Signs) in several ways: i. Creates new standards (Subsection 18.435.130.H) for Downtown Tigard and Tigard Triangle (MU-CBD and TMU zones respectively) separate from standards for the C-G zone. See Attachment 3 for a detailed description of the proposed changes, including the types of signs that this proposal would make nonconforming. ii. Clarifies sign definitions, permitting requirements, and standards to improve readability, consistency, and structure and to remove contradictory, redundant, and content-based text. All proposed changes are housekeeping in nature. b. Amends Chapter 18.650 (Downtown Tigard Plan District) to allow weather protection elements on buildings to project further and lower into the right-of-way (i.e. over sidewalks) and to delete all sign standards so as to not create confusion with the sign standards in Chapter 18.435. c. Amends Chapter 18.660 (Tigard Triangle Plan District) to allow weather protection elements on buildings to project further and lower into the right-of-way (i.e. over sidewalks); to allow Landmark Ford the potential to modestly expand their business in the future; and to modify the block perimeter standard and measurement approach so that they are consistent with the street network map and community expectations. d. Amends Chapter 18.660 and Map 18.660.B (Tigard Triangle Transportation Network) to slightly change the alignment of a future path and add design standards and a future business access street parallel to Pacific Highway that connects the western portion of Atlanta Street to the future 74th Avenue. A longer version of this future business access street is shown on the existing Tigard Triangle Street Plan, but it was determined that only a portion of it would be a viable and effective addition to the street network. City and Agency Comments The proposed amendments were developed in close consultation with the city's Engineering Department, specifically those amendments involving projections into the public right-of-way and transportation mitigation requirements for TPR compliance. Their comments and suggestions were incorporated into the proposed amendments throughout the code-writing process. Affected agencies and jurisdictions had an opportunity to review and comment on the proposed code amendments. As of the writing of this report, Metro and the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) provided comments. •Metro supports the city's efforts to rezone and spur development in the Triangle and commented on the city's need to comply with Title 6 of the Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan with respect to updating the Tigard Town Center boundary and developing a parking management plan. As a result, the adopting ordinance commits the city to completing these two tasks within a specific timeframe. •The proposed TSP amendments were developed in close consultation with ODOT, specifically those involving state transportation mitigation requirements for TPR compliance. ODOT is on record as accepting the city's TPR analysis and associated mitigation projects. ODOT also commented on the proposed sign code amendments that resulted in minor revisions to the proposal. Public Comments Staff notified all Tigard Triangle interested parties (71 recipients) by email on October 16 and 31, 2017 and all Tigard Triangle and Downtown Tigard property owners, business owners, and residents (2,011 recipients) by mail on October 17, 2017. Both notices provided information about the public hearing process and solicited public input. Additionally, staff met with Jim Corliss of Landmark Ford on October 25, 2017 to discuss how the proposed amendments may or may not affect the future operation or expansion of this business. As of the writing of this staff report, staff has received five written comments, all of which are summarized and included in Attachment 5. No testimony was provided at the Planning Commission hearing. A number of comments led to changes to the proposed amendments. Most notable are the changes made as result of requests by Jim Corliss of Landmark Ford and Base Camp I LLC. Mr. Corliss' requested change was included in the Planning Commission's package of amendments. Base Camp's requested changes came too late to be reviewed by the Planning Commission. Staff has included them in the City Council's package of amendments attachment 2). They are also separately summarized and included in Attachment 4. Staff worked directly with Base Camp to draft code language to resolve their concerns and recommends that Council accept the proposed modifications. Summary The proposal is subject to several city, regional, and state provisions. The findings and conclusions that are included as Exhibit D to Attachment 6 document the proposal's compliance with the following applicable provisions: •Tigard Community Development Code Chapters 18.380 and 18.390 •Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goals 1, 2, 8, 9, 10, and 12 •Metro Code 3.07 (Urban Growth Management Functional Plan) Titles 6 and 8 •Metro Code 3.08 (Regional Transportation Functional Plan) Titles 1 and 4 •Oregon Transportation Planning Rule OAR 660-012-0060 •Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, and 12 In addition to complying with all applicable city, regional, and state provisions, the proposed amendments: •Advance Tigard's mission to become the most walkable city in the Pacific Northwest where people of all ages and abilities enjoy healthy and interconnected lives; •Implement the community's vision for the Triangle to become an active, urban, multimodal, and mixed-use district; •Support development in the Triangle that is consistent with the area's designation as a regional Town Center; and •Support pedestrian-oriented signage in the Triangle and Downtown Tigard. Planning Commission unanimously recommends that City Council approve an ordinance adopting the proposed amendments known as the Tigard Triangle Lean Code Phase II amendments. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Council could direct staff to modify the proposed amendments. Council could also reject all or portions of the package of proposed amendments. If Council rejects the amendments to rezone the Triangle or add the required transportation mitigation projects to the Transportation System Plan, the Tigard Triangle Lean Code that was approved by Council in August 2017 would not go into effect. Existing zoning and development regulations that govern the Triangle would continue to apply. If Council rejects the amendments to create new sign regulations for the Triangle and Downtown, existing sign regulations that collectively govern signs in these areas and the city's General Commercial (C-G) zone would continue to apply. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS Council Goal 3: Make Downtown Tigard a Place Where People Want to Be Council Goal 5: Implement Tigard Triangle Strategic Plan (TTSP) City Strategic Plan Goal 1: Facilitate walking connections to develop an identity City Strategic Plan Goal 2: Ensure development advances the vision DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Mar 2015 — Staff completed the Tigard Triangle Strategic Plan (TTSP) Aug 2015 — Staff updated Council and Planning Commission on the Lean Code Project Dec 2015 — Staff updated Council on the Lean Code Project Sep 2016 — Staff updated Council and Planning Commission on the Lean Code and Urban Renewal Projects Feb 2017 — Staff briefed Council on the Lean Code #1 (Lean Code Overview) Mar 2017 — Staff briefed Council on the Lean Code #2 (Form Based Code Elements) Apr 2017 — Staff briefed Council on the Lean Code #3 (Lean Code Annotated Table of Contents) Aug 2017 — Council adopted the Tigard Triangle Lean Code with an effective date contingent upon adoption of new zoning in the Triangle Attachments ATT 1: PC Recommendation Memo ATT 2:Proposal ATT 3: Sign Proposal Summary ATT 4: Staff Modification Memo ATT 5:Public Comments Ordinance and Exhibits Attachment 1 ' City of Tigard TIGARD Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and City Councilors From: Brian Feeney,Vice President, Tigard Planning Commission Re: Planning Commission Recommendation on the Tigard Triangle Lean Code Phase II Amendments (Case File Nos. ZON2017-00002, CPA2017-00002, and DCA 2017-00004) Date: November 7, 2017 On November 6, 2017, the Tigard Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Tigard Triangle Lean Code Phase II Amendments. After listening to staff's presentation, followed by careful deliberations, the Planning Commission made a unanimous recommendation to City Council to approve the Tigard Triangle Lean Code Phase II Amendments with some minor modifications proposed by staff. The hearing was attended by approximately eight members of the public, none of whom provided testimony. The Planning Commission also reviewed three written comments on the day of the hearing, all in support of the proposed amendments. The focus of the Planning Commission's deliberations was primarily on the treatment of nonconforming signs and the Landmark Ford expansion provision. Nonconforming Signs Staff explained that a number of existing freestanding signs in Downtown and the Triangle, which are auto-oriented in nature,would become nonconforming signs if the proposed amendments were adopted. Staff also clarified that nonconforming signs are allowed to remain into perpetuity with a few limitations, e.g. sign copy changes and normal maintenance and repair are allowed, but structural changes are not allowed. An abandoned nonconforming sign is also required to come into conformance after 90 days. The provisions on nonconforming signs are existing adopted policy. The proposed sign code amendments do not include changes to these provisions because they apply citywide, not just to the Downtown and Tigard Triangle areas. The city's existing nonconforming sign policy coupled with the number of signs that would become nonconforming as a result of the proposed amendments was concerning to some Commissioners. However, the deliberations on nonconforming signs concluded with the general acceptance that it was necessary for such signs,which are auto-oriented in nature, to be phased Page 1 of 2 I Planning Commission Recommendation to City Council out of existence in order to realize the community's vision for a more walkable and pedestrian- oriented environment in Downtown and the Triangle. Landmark Ford Expansion Provision Staff explained that Landmark Ford was opposed to their property being rezoned from General Commercial (C-G) to Triangle Mixed-Use (TMU). As a result, staff drafted additional amendments to the Tigard Triangle Plan District Chapter that relates to pre- existing uses that would give Landmark Ford the potential to modestly expand their business in the future. Staff asserted that the proposed amendments were a reasonable compromise and preferable to the property remaining zoned C-G. Staff reported that Landmark Ford is on record as supporting the rezone of their property to TMU as long as the additional amendments to the Tigard Triangle Plan District Chapter are included in the package of Tigard Triangle Lean Code Phase II Amendments. Two Commissioners did not think it was appropriate to single out one business for special treatment in the code. However, all agreed with staff that the proposed amendments were a reasonable compromise and preferable to the property remaining zoned C-G. Conclusion The Planning Commission is pleased to forward its recommendation on the Tigard Triangle Lean Code Phase II Amendments. Our recommendation included careful review of all public comments and a thorough deliberation of all issues raised. We are excited about the prospect of having the Lean Code go into effect with the adoption of new zoning and the introduction of new pedestrian-oriented sign regulations. We believe that this proposal effectively balances the needs of property owners and community members in new and innovative ways that allow for both certainty and flexibility. We look forward to your review of the proposed amendments at the upcoming public hearing on December 12, 2017. Page 2 of 2 I Planning Commission Recommendation to City Council i _ . Attachment 2 TIGARD City of Tigard Proposed (File Nos. CPA2017-00002, ZON2017-00002, DCA2017-00004) TIGARD TRIANGLE LEAN COPE Phase II City Council Draft — December 12, 2017 CONNECTED The city adopted the Tigard Triangle Lean new streets Code in August 2017. The goal of the new and new trails 0101 OM - - I code is to spur development by reducing SAFE regulations in ways that support the r community's vision for walkability. I more sidewalks, bike lanes,and ACTIVE lighting Phase II of this project proposes new zoning, new sign regulations, and updates to the new neighborhood services and destinationscity's Transportation System Plan to refine - to visit � ATTRACTIVE and implement the newly adopted code. It I also signregulations for i more street trees proposes new s. , and new street-facing Downtown Tigard to ensure consistency buildings with parking in back with the community's plans for this area. Please contact Susan P. Shanks, Senior Planner, at 503-718-2454 or susans@tigard-or.gov with questions or comments about the proposed code amendments and/or the code adoption process. III _ „ TIGAR r City of Tigard m Proposed Table of Contents I. Zoning & Land Use Map Proposal I ZON2017-00002 & CPA2017-00002 (Shows the proposed zoning and land use designations and the changes between the existing and proposed designations) II. Transportation System Plan (TSP) Proposal I CPA2017-00002 (Modifies text, maps, and projects in response to Zoning Map Proposal and Transportation Planning Rule Analysis) III. Development Code Proposal I DCA2017-00004 (Modifies sign code, Chapter 18.435, and the Downtown and Tigard Triangle plan districts, Chapters 18.650 and 18.660, in response to adopted Lean Code and TSP Proposal)*** ***Please note that these chapter numbers relate to the city's new development code structure.The new structure has not yet gone into effect, but it will be in effect by the time this proposal goes through the review process.The sign code is currently Chapter 18.780.The Downtown and Tigard Triangle plan districts are currently Chapters 18.610 and 18.620 respectively. Additionally,Chapter 18.620 still contains the old plan district standards because the Lean Code,which was adopted in August 2017, will not go into effect until new zoning, which is part of this proposal, is adopted. Please contact Susan P. Shanks, Senior Planner, at 503-718-2454 or susans@tigard-or.gov with questions or comments about the proposed code amendments and/or the code adoption process. I. Zoning & Land Use Map Proposal (Z0N2017-00002 and CPA2017-00002) __ ________ , I I 1 r. E SIT ._ =�-- --- - Tigard i Tigard Triangle Existing = 1�'J� ;_ � , ' �i ONADG BT and Proposed Comprehensive nSPRUCEST �T °�'` Plan and Zoning Designations 111,41p,..., a F W 1 F Existing f nDQEL'1] 2 9LF • General Commercial(C-G)Zone 1, _ +� ,j1� Mixed-Use Employment(MUE) j -1,---:.. 1 \OC' / 1' Proposed , p AlO Triangle Mixed-Use(TMU)Zone 13 W s FFLE ST a v t—� Tigard Triangle o _.-.-J i'. i PALLA CO PrW. - ATLANTA ST HAINES ST I V ' - _¢ kir 1. BAYLORSTYLOR:^ BAYLORST P W v9� . 6% i Q W 73 J i'--,--'\ II\ II r CLINTON ST CLINTO O CLINTON ST 1 �„Gp 7� 1;9Sr a - DEN PL sr * § , w w •� DoucLnso x 'gid P g w ELMHURST ST ELMHURST ST.: ----- + 0 : 1 ,_. d0, HER OW AY ' J. = �- II1 **4 MOS AYW F, :i Y FRANKLIN ST =v l�1 ( �.,* = \,� BEVELAND RD Eo/ELAND RD ¢ SOUTH WOOD DR µ N`'Ha _i � � ¢ H -- y GONZAGA ST = x k ;- . _ GY2i I. FRRp a ¢ • • \^ HAMPTON = l it `-.� STAMPTON ST —� .' I/UNZIKERhi ISTA W $ PAMELA,ST.A ` Y CRESTVIEW ST 46 IIIIIIp �� 711_21_11Ni iST- VARNSST_ 1I I 1VARNS ST r— 'IR 1 FIR ST" -- O _+ I I� 1 O -� FIR LO Jill -> 7 ( I 1 1140, I -r2 , .,,. _j PO-51 - n __ SANDm A W SANDBURG ST:; i NOO_.+_.—�. TECH CENTLTECH CENTER DR ,..wim. 1�TTi-i�l f----,--�r q _PINE ST�.�_ _.- i.. t._'LI_-1L.-L_ LL _l I INl T ! Tigard Triangle ; ...�.` F t;_1 s_o �i� _a co,N DD ST Comprehensive Plan and iSIRUCEITI -SPRUCE ST (..-�T Zoning Designations 88 8uw I I-- Li General Commercial (C-G)Zone / Triangle Mixed-Use(TMU)Zone —=� G•y)s °\") /in Tigard Triangle � . ` ( '_m PFAFFLE 6T. LJ J. f W sa PFAFFLE ST b< S' VIM y , N �' PALLA Ilk ' -" ATLANTA ST �� '4111111k : HAWES S7 ATLANTASY- i 7 1 �I. BAYLOR ST / ) f .- , I _I F.:+ BAYLO R'�I{S�_,TJJ((,,I�� I ' N�._.f AJ _.. CLINTON ST z .�. . 1 am / ' DRT MUT sT J .'"GARDEN PL_ --___r 1 11111111111, ._ w �KNO ~— <<o� IP III I I, — �HERMOSO WAY Q r �� _. FRANKLIN ST © r_. ! i....... if; 1 1 1 1 ' I --"'i Iw 'IAV-'{/-}II}�-1'�-II} 1 BEVELAND RD BEV_ELAND RD-J t < SOUTHWOOD DR 411111‘ N I NM ___ , GHa�FRq 1 - -a—a .__ O , GONZAGA ST _ F 2 •7 ti i II L e. //r4.., a., ,20- k?. HAMPTON ST �' _ �� - a •1 ,i r 1111111146 �� \ f\\\ HAMPTON ST '— s K Li' 1 no TAME LI ♦ y CRESNIEW ST v, SSP/ LI I , VARNS ST- VARNS T_ I_NSST _ 1 I \ > 1 t---vFIR 1 1 ` , E.' t x I\....'''''..- -."----1 U FIRST O- - f 1 �. Z I L I f I T� 11I p -1_1 SAND 1R� Hl _.. _. .. O Al QST f ! I <A°0---1-1-- NOL,_ TECH CENTER DR__t_. -- II. Transportation System Plan Proposal (CPA2017-00002) Proposed new text is underlined. Development of the 2035 TSP Proposed deleted text is shown as A notable finding from this step was that there were projects from previous planning efforts that no longer meet the community goals.As such,the following projects were removed from the TSP: 1 Nimbus Avenue Extension due to environmental impacts to Fanno Creek and related cost effectiveness. F Wall Street Extension due to cost effectiveness and potential environmental justice impacts. P New interchange on Highway 217 at the extension of SW 68th Avenue due to inconsistency with the RTP and ODOT plans. Step 4:Review of Bridge Projects Due to their high costs,the projects requiring bridge structures to cross highways and railroad tracks were considered to determine if all were necessary,identify which projects were most desired within the planning horizon as well as those that should be include for the purpose of long-term right-of- way protection.This review identified existing plans for a total of seven grade-separated crossings. The individual project evaluations in Step 3 were supplemented with the overall review of the number of costly grade-separated crossing proposed.On that basis,the following crossings have been removed from the TSP or modified: F Northern Washington Square Regional Center crossing(Highway 217 crossing)was modified to a pedestrian and bicycle connection only. b Wall Street extension(railroad crossing)was removed due to cost effectiveness and potential environmental justice impacts as described as part of Step 3. 6 Dartmouth Street/Hunziker connection(over Highway 217)was removed due to cost and redundancy with the Hunziker Street/Hampton Street Connection. 1, Durham Road extension under I-5 was not included due to limited system benefits and cost effectiveness. The following crossings were recommended to remain in the 2035 TSP: Northern Washington Square Regional Center crossing(as pedestrian/bike connection only) F Southern Washington Square Regional Center crossing Hunziker Street/Hampton BevelandRoad(formedyHamptonStreet)connection over Highway 217 1 Step 5 Step 5 of the alternatives analysis included evaluation of potential new roadway projects that would benefit overall multi-modal system operations.Two of the notable new projects in the 2035 TSP include the North Dakota-Pfaffle Neighborhood Route and North Dakota realignment.These projects are envisioned to occur in tandem with or subsequent to realignment of Tiedeman to the west away from the North Dakota-Greenburg Road intersection. The North Dakota-Pfaffle neighborhood route and North Dakota realignment would provide a much needed east-west connection between Pfaffle and North Dakota Street over Highway 217 and would provide an alternative to Pacific Highway and Walnut Street for travel between east and west 4.16 City of Tigard 2035 TSP Transportation System Plan Special Areas The following section identifies the three areas within the city—Tigard Triangle,Washington Square Regional Center and Downtown Tigard—with growth opportunities but also significant transportation challenges.Each of the three areas are described below,including a summary of current transportation challenges,followed bystrategies for infrastructure investments which are depicted in Figures 5-12 through 5-15. In addition to improvement projects,this 2035 TSP identifies non-SOV mode split targets for the Tigard Triangle that are higher than required by the Metro RTP(see Table 5-3).Achieving these targets will require integrated land use and parking management strategies. i Land Use Planning Each of these areas is designated for significant housing and employment growth.The land in the Tigard Triangle is zoned for commercial development(west of 72nd Avenue)and mixed use development(cast of 72nd Avenue). Development of commercial and residential uses in close proximity to each other promotes walking trips for commute trips and non-commute travel. These opportunities can be captured by incorporating densities, mixed-uses, design standards and other land use strategies in the overall planning efforts for the areas. An initial look at land use alternatives will occur with the initial phases of HCT planning. Development patterns that support HCT—such as mixed uses,higher densities, pedestrian orientation—will encourage the public investments necessary to implement HCT.As future transportation and land uses studies for HCT move forward,theywill help to identify complementary land use and transportation investments to support HCT and other transit service to Tigard. Parking Management Parking management will be a critical component of creating travel options to and from each sub area.Adequate parking is essential to economic vitality;at the same time too much parking can degrade the pedestrian environment and cause excessive physical space dedicated to parking.A review of parking requirements and parking management measures is warranted in conjunction with land use planning for these areas.In particular,as more emphasis and investment is directed toward walk,bike and transit trips,the amount of parking and the way that it is used will be modified to supportthe priority purposes of each Subarea. Tigard Triangle The Tigard Triangle is a priority opportunity for community development and economic activity.The triangle Triangle has long been a retail and commercial hub within the city.Today,the triangle Triangle is zoned for commercial and mixed-use development and is identified as an area of significant future growth in housing and jobs. Although the area is bordered by three major regional roadways,in many ways those these roadways function as barriers to access the triangle Triangle.Travel to and from the Tigard Triangle is funneled 2035 TSP 1 City of Tigard 5.73 Transportation System Plan from Pacific Highway via 72ndAvenue,Dartmouth Streetand 68th Parkway;the Highway 217/72nd Avenue interchange;the northbound I-5 interchange with Haines Street;and the southbound I-5 interchange with Dartmouth Street. Access to and from the Tigard Triangle area is,and will remain,a critical issue to the success of the Tigard Triangle area.The majority of employees and customers traveling to the area on city streets access the Tigard Triangle area off of Pacific Highway.There is considerable congestion on Pacific Highway in the vicinity of the Tigard Triangle,and this congestion is forecast to worsen with future development and regional growth. A second issue with the Tigard Triangle relates to non-auto mobility/circulation to,oto.from,and within the area.The triangle Triangle area as a whole is generally sloping downward from Pacific Highway and I- 5 to Highway 217.The topography makes pedestrian and bicycle transportation more difficult.These conditions are worsened by incomplete bicycle and pedestrian systems within the Triangle. At the broadest level,options for improving access to the Tigard Triangle area fall into the following categories: t Provide additional intersection and roadway capacity improvements to improve traffic operations at the boundary streets. Provide additional roadway capacity as development occurs to support a pedestrian-oriented development pattern.Maximize existing infrastructure investments by focusing on parking management and travel demand management programs. b Provide a more integrated system of transportation options for pedestrians.cyclists.and transit users. Minimize additional roadway capacity infrastructure investment and focus on travel demand management (TDM) programs. Provide better facilities for alternative modes(transit,bicycles,pedestrians,etc.). Create a mix of critical additional capacity and implementing TDM programs. Figure 5-12 shows the existing and planned transportation facilities in the Tigard Triangle that improve access to,from. and within the area. New streets,trails,and paths are designed to complete the original street grid pattern and provide additional circulation options for all modes of travel. New bridges to the east and west are intended to overcome the barriers created by Highway 217 and Interstate 5 and create a better connection with Downtown Tigard. In addition to providing bicycle and pedestrian facilities along the entire length of 72nd Avenue,a 72nd Avenue corridor study is needed to determine segment-specific cross sections that address the competing multimodal transportation needs along this corridor. Figure 5 12 shows the planned roadway improvement projects related to access to the Tigard Triangle.Within the Triangle, the impeovement projects include several capacity enhancements to existing roadways,extension of Atlanta Street to connect 68th Avenue and Dartmouth,and a new Highway 217 overcrossing connecting Hunziker Streetto Hampton Street.The Atlanta Street extension and Hunziker Street overcrossing would pcovide needed additional circulation options for auto and non auto modes of transportation within the Tigard Triangle. In addition,the Hunziker Street ovcrcrossing would provide an additional access to the Tigard Triangle ar a from the south and west. 5.74 2035 TSP City of Tigard The plan also includes widening 72ndAvenue(arterial)and Dartmouth Street(collector)to five for I 5 travel and could become signific-a- '. - - . .. - ' • - -- • - Triangle.An initial step toward realizing these projects is a corridor study(sec Table 5 1)to review street cross sections and potential parallel routes.Specific project considerations for the Tigard Triangle can be found in Technical Memorandum#5 in the Volume 3 Technical Appendix. ABLE 5-6: MULTI-MODAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENT LISP Project Name Project Type Description 34 Special Jurisdiction Time Financially Cost ID Area Frame Constrained Estimate Add signal and northbound right turn lane on 65th Ave at Haines St to 65th Avenue/Haines Intersection Tigard 3 maintain or improve mobility, Portland Near-term ye 6 $1.000.000 Street Improvement queuing.and safety for TPRS Triangle —� compliance Complete interchange reconstruction with additional 9RHighway217/72nd Ave lanes to maintain or improve 4 Interchange Interchange mobility.queuing.and safety for Tigard ODOT Near-term Yes '5A000 9 Improvements Improvement TPR compliance.such as the Triangle $30.000.000 addition of a second northbound right turn lane overcroecings Wall Street/Tech Center Complete Wall St from Hunziker Rd la Drive Extension' New Road to terminus and extend to Tech Tigard Near-term NQ $6.000.000 Center Dr along railway Extend Atlanta Street west 19 Atlanta Street extension New Road from 69th Ave to future Tigard Tigard Mid-term Yes 9,000 74th Ave Triangle $6.000.000 Street Connect Hunziker Road to 72nd •Him Avenue requires over crossing ODOT/ 23 g.uunzik,e. New-React Mid-ter= Yes 00 over Highway 217 removes Tigard Street intersection Highway 217 overcrossing Nem, Construct new Highway 217 Tigard ODOT/ La overcrossing to connect Beveland Rd Triangle/ Mid-term Its $30.000.000 at Beveland Bridge Tigard to Hunziker Rd Downtown Extend 74th Ave south from Pacific Tigard 28 74th Avenue extension New Road Highway to Hermoso Wy or Beveland Tigard Mid-term Yes6 $5,000.000 Triangle ABLE 5-6: MULTI-MODAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENT LISP Project Name Project Type Descriptions Special jurisdiction Time Financially Cost ID Area Frame Constrained Estimate 2. 68th _ Dartmouth Strcct/I 5Ramps and Tigard rade Tigard Mid-term Ne $10,000,000 so. Triangle 72nd Avenue widening: 31 ORE99WPacific Road Widento4/5lanes Tigard Tigard Mid-term Yes $8,000,000 Highway to Dartmouth Widening Triangle Dartmouth Street -Read ard widedieg W Tigard Naar- Ne $320,000 section missing in mstbound Triangle dire, y) Widen to 4 lanes plus turn lanes and sidewalks between 72nd Ave and 1-5(68th Ave)to maintain or improve mobility.queuing.and Trd 38 Dartmouth Street widening Widening safety for TPR5 compliance,such as T angle Tigard Near-term Yes $3,000,000 the addition of a second westbound through lane and dedicated westbound left turn lane at 68th Ave 68th Avenue/Atlanta Street Intersection Add traffic Traffic signal and Tigard 50 /Maine:, Improvement turn lanes where necessary Triangle Tigard Near-term Yes-HQ $500,000 Intemeettaa Ne Street � turn lanes where necessary Triangle e OTigarA Near-term Q 72nd^ve..u, Dart ouch intersection Traffic signal and Tigard Tigard Near-term Yes $471-00,000 Street Improvement intersection widening Triangle Intersection improvements to maintain or improve mobility and safety for TPR5 compliance.such as the removal of the northbound left Pacific Highway/I-5 Intersection Tigard ODOT, ! I $ 008 88 66d turn lane/signal at 64th Ave such a:, Near-term Yes Southbound(SB)Ramp Improvement Triangle Portland $100.000 ABLE 5-6: MULTI-MODAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENT LISP Project Special Time Financially Cost ID Name Project Type Description34- Area jurisdiction Frame Constrained Estimate Mi eMulti-use Path Projects Construct new hard surface trail along Red Rock Creek parallel to Tigard 6 M10 Red Rock Creek Trail New Trail and south of Pacific Highway Triangle ' Tigard Long-Term yeS $3,000.000 Construct new pedestrian bridge ODOT, Beveland Pedestrian over Interstate 5 between Tigard Tigard, 6 M11 Bridge New Bridge Beveland Rd in Tigard to Triangle Clackamas Long-Term Yes $6.000.000 Southwood Dr in Clackamas County County �l 1 Transportation System Management Arterial Provide arterial corridor mgt.Arterial Corridor Management along Corridor Tigard TSM4 72nd Avenue Corridor #19( Hwy 217)in the Metro Triangle Tigard Mid-term No $1,700,000 Management TSMO Plan These projects were modified in 2017 to be consistent with various Tigard Triangle planning documents:3,4, 19,23,28,29,31,37,38,50,51,52,66d,M10,M11, and TSM4.Projects 3,28,M10,and Ml 1 were added. Projects 29,37,51,and 52 were deleted because they were completed or no longer needed.The descriptions and cost estimates for Projects 4, 19,23,38,and 66d were revised. All other edits were minor. 4All road projects include bicycle and pedestrian facilities, consistent with the adopted street design standards for the street classification. 5TPR generally refers to the Oregon Transportation Planning Rule(OAR 600-012-0060)and specifically to the TPR compliance report that was completed in November 2017 for the Tigard Triangle rezone. This report identified the need for TPR mitigation projects and led to the addition of Project 3 and the modification of Projects 4,38,and 66d. 6 These projects are proposed to be included in the 2018 RTP financially constrained project list. 'This project was added in 2017 to be consistent with the city's economic development initiatives for the Hunziker Industrial Core Area. The project timelines identified in Table 55-66 are depicted in Figure 5-9, Figure 5-10 and Figure 5-11. The first figure shows only near- term projects; Figure 5-10 shows the combined Near-term and Mid-term projects. Figure 5-11 shows all of the planned projects. • a .. r -'''''''i A Figure 5-2 I NI \' Roadway Functional y ((I Classification • BRE � � ` Ti erd Urban ' • i� K".�i""� �_ S Planning Area i el _co, • i • T j. . ii!y i Freeway _ .... �. •-^_Principal Arterial '! if- >�ew.wwww....w ........-. _.. _Arterial a.On- d4o- ' Collector •1 $ ': _ -Neighborhood - �I'0.1)*...� . -Local Y-'-"special Transportation ..... � Area(STA) • ``,., •Future Roadways ♦ �� ' Other Map Elements • li 11111T Transit Center 6 wt h 'a' . �iip. •♦ • -- "•'w Tigard City Boundary ;a € , I ' c_. ' See Figure ete ++++f Other Rail Lmes ,.wit u ., for complete s' „ _ �'� i Tigard Triangle i wF AM? # r , Trrai ....... ir to. ansporation Trans oration .a I Network r ' '''• 11174 I I I I I I M I I t I 21 I OA 1111.14 I I I I I I I I I I 4. ,... 1 _, , 7 , , .-, .te,L, 4 r ■,iirri,L. ,, c\J , ' Ill i I Alkil mahlip _ Li IT - 40....,,,,:. ,,,,,,,,, . .... , .. , „„„), ri . ii, ..., ,g ,.. ,,,,,g .e. k40� • Er o , : , � ....,. ••• r r\ -��• q • f f rn info preumed m rill ■ p' crit x of October z.znn. '" 40.. �1..... d a ... ai is s .azo madeavnow Jcc ion mendmmts oavr 4. alcor lha� lof n.mep. pad j DOWNTOWN Tvy �I 1 82 25 TAYLORS FERRY RD Ay b� J Fi re 5-4 ! ii , N Future ® n • • $ Roadway • ; a� Improvements I /fit T C ' FF99- ze Jn Tigard Urban Z i 11.4 D�� 2 • _ -- PlanningArea • � �' : .. • ....1 i_..i 1� ci j' �� BG I m exofrw000 , dA,' •> m 58 ----_.._ I, CIsP �2ti .'`� •: G4 ,41a •9LF m p OAK ST F.xisfing Facilities j 1,7, 1 -�� w �8 ��m • m • CIor, PI• Major Roads S�' • 41 Q O 40 6j 1 V 661 Local Roads • • '• • w Future Facilities ••FANNO CH PARK '{ ®. 1 mut DAKOTA ST • w / i Road Improvement auaeaa,uenuur, 4. // (includes pedestrian �y = - _ •� , HAINES S I ••a a and bike facilities) O - �— 0 65` ; ® ' lopt,Aik ••••a®P• 50 New Road Qr �� 1► • (includes pedestrian fIties �P •$.. 66 DARTMOUTH ST I ## WALNUT sT ;� .- �O� WOODARD PARK i �4, �� ► 38 51 \ O Intersection Protea `� 0 I, S4; H r I' ## Road Pro'ect ,( OT si �� ITJ oRrKwcw PARK (--- ,A0401- N 48 �. DOWNTOWN a • �q<,i, '� t INSET 11•G,y �� F Other Map Elements 66 o !A.:et J•••.{ >-,I j X/ l`4t al��rpvd �.. ! I7kF. ®.-_t •••••...Tigard City Boundary a - - • 27 �,. i. i ®\O B TO Transit Center x r._ i ` tiik cn L o ''(a'_.....: f .._...� • --.... ♦ Parks 5 Water (1\ iii r •. 'COsy it I'r C't•.. L r.,. a GAARD Q WDLL St .:. '- ' q R01 I .S.t...n-.._3i._-..._._._., 1 r EST fi6k MCDONALD ST •�' rJ � m 1 0`� 1 F11'( --I_..._ �.o•RPAs 1 . ® See Figure 5-12 -.. BONITA RD BULL LMOUNJTAIN RD __� r _ 3fia a 3fib for 2017 updates 1. L to Tigard Triangle 'a r... I '6m L`' �7 1 E._. >: Planned a o Improvements n w 6 (,— \ 1-- P� 9 BEEF BEND RD 66n♦ - 71 DURHAM RD �`i F 6 39 a0 Fy it •33Z 11 Iil .•.. CooK DARK P r ._.._._.. map The inr Information represented as 56 a ` .; (S •p s•current as or r<n .m25.20 10 / )C._.._.a sleMI or woccur h< m. as new ...vamns .. ,he content of amendments the r map. 25 _TAYLORS EERRY 12D ' X85/ Figure 5-5 El m - E I ` 02 . -, Right-of-Way W'Y o • • LI.,. 22; -- •��"'�otL,' LOBUS,ST ai.nst.L,4-- ;..� Needs —, � Er s 4 a I 1 i a� MI i •,a ``I I 2v 1241 o! OAK ST 90 '.'_ Cm - "figard Urban • w a 2 4 e so-i00-5FERRYRo 1 ��N •U ` > >—. PINT Planning Area -- yG 1111 = 5 Q m S w t�� —'-'�('9s ®� -- - I1 Roadway Cross-Section ° w;� fF 01 PFAFFLE w HAINES',lir 2 to 3 Lanes o � �% �� • ffr 1O:T'll ,, 7 '..", t �� 0„ ��tLNUTST 'C� �. DAR 3 ..n,-t �4 .{� y a Other Map Elements i. • ig Nvr ,,`'.**4**- ®.` GNI�k Oy m, Transit Center .....ce 10 yS ti 23 s - ®'” �'4 \• . \ --____,_,_„7,' s Tigard City Boundary •• Q °�, r 110 Q •� �� `' 1 „- + Other Rail Lines I.217 �n..... , I WEs .m tt. ___ , 41.9 GAARDE ST �,90 ��'C'1,-1,,_ 41 X._ �n:e.,.�a ..n... ia` ONALD STS, i '°,ti RO _ f ? ra . r` _ �� MI BULL MOUNTAIN RD BONITA RD r , _ ❑t 'sb — See Figure 5-12 .� I 36a irj for 2017 updates L.,., : _ 6 9 �� w Y a A 1 • i. i.......1. Al Z a mil .e._, -x� z ,_ I ., to Tigard Triangle t,�`'�11111 �� - Planned .....,,, 1 �" h ® Improvements BEEF BEND RD 1 DURHAM RD 517 _ �O 1401 A gi 4116 luno. f CI / e Q �-0A o1.2 N... .;.# r..F N L....7 *.The information represented on this i......nnn. map is current as of February 28,2010. Revisions will be made as new decisions i ,enor amendments occur to alter the content / Z�,,.e' gL a o� of the map. / MI DOWNTOWN TAYLORS FERRY RD Figure 5-6 INSET 0 ® ' i-t] \ 26 • k <•a \. / . l 0 - Future • q7< �J _ Pdestrian • • 1 iM190DARD PARK ®.e ® - O0 Network 1•-••i �,.... El. 2 `••• ♦ <#4TC 1 Zye PtOI Tigard Urban Gr P�g�� { v RD ,.....7 ® 9` \,i- ::e,' t .i.. r Planning Area i� 1 . t, 1 SCROLLS FERR F •LL, p 2 - OAK ST- • Existing Facilities �:i: t. oo• K tGr _.;,,f � �� 7 ti a ® ' S0 ri Sidewalk ze ,Sp PC7 , • b a► en — • BG � I 4t < I Multi-Use Path 1 ....Sp. 00 4,4‘S l ♦ ® Future Facilities • / . _ 1 ti NORTH DA KO TA Si •••• Sidewalk •/ ......F:w C PARK , , I La r- .aei �. / I 00 ¢ au �® _ 14VA popIL I/ K•• Multi-Use Path iA'e. ...�...._..._.. .. ..._... i_N ys" ` Att. PF > :AINES til •••• Neighborhood Path n m o Cs� OQF y P 0 MI 114 ••e= I ## Roadway Project m p • n _�T�{ - PO ' r `' ®DARTMOUTH ST I Other MapElements ;- -P,...� WALNUT S7 / • �'�aoo.an rue.: :^4 m3 TC • ti o.rew/ARK M2 ell O Transit Center ' I. WPt fl\IT ooweTOwNv r • _•_•Tigard City Boundary s R•s yq WG INSE, • G,ye/te.. Water tett....".'.. rt�.J {1 s>. La PCT�. ! Parks • a r ^ `t •1r� a :27 r I h•i �` cc 1 w iMS i i G • ID • �.�. • •00 1 G , _ WAIEST %♦ ® M1 0 •--•• Q MCDONALD ST n•.� .I• r ..:, r..� - , GAARDE ST P M. i • C: El m' 5511 MOUNTAIN RD 125. I, • i, . • \� T S. tli D See Figure 5-12 • I .••.,,.,•_,•� i i .... P6 2 •t, •� e Q for 2017 updates N �, ® > to Tigard Triangle .0. or i V o planned Z Y Improvements • m Ei'l Q- BEEF BEND RD - : '- " DURHAM RD �� x. •W •••�Q1 •, Ov. a�y�� • Otl Q •1• Et. B ..R.. .1— ,N &: Tualatin River® 4 coon noon El 5 •• &. .••• Cross1 The inlbrm.hon represented on this Tortquin Trail // a r tn 0 •.nebmery 28.201 ,/•x to Tualatin I< Su be mode e deLt mons or amendments occurto alter 1.---.11''S ._._.N•. too content of the map DOWNTOWN ~ ` TAVLORS FERRY RD \ Figure 5-7 INSET 0 1 , 2s Bg s�\1 E '•� 1 ...® • w Future Y g i ` Bicycle z;t ♦��O e lit ( R.e _ $ Network 1 �♦S T C 1 Zye �� 1....,,,- El � Tigard Urban �S ♦♦♦ /S G . 'T� v, .• ' .. Planning Area S . -'49 v B30 trt ! I� tf ♦% I llS FERRY RD ..•' 9L i .>..22 O �SCHO •F•� w OAK ST Existing Facilities • !.• • �.py ♦� 1 *�. �� O\ ® • ..'� PIa -Bike Lane 1 0 y9y ��1 aTb _ a _.. -.. s .• — . -Multi-Use Path u.1 V ST s r ¢ --"' ♦ w Future Facilities ® I. i _. NORTH DAKOTA ST • ••• < e ••■• ®� RUM.PAM �� • ♦i ! ti _. _ ----a m'® .••. Bike Lane ■ '♦i ®J' ® S • Bike Boulevard •♦ y = `� C• PF: > HAINES ST ...........L a �... ...�. e.. �O� 1ml ��P �: a tg ... Multi-Use Path s m i V Z •• Neighborhood Path l ' . 1 °� __ �__. `' Ell n �,�� xp Roadway Project 9y K'ALNUT STS DARTMOUTH ST a •,©• '^..•. < f w I > Other Map Elements LrJ r ewnax LNUSm . ..dL' I n ..'�^ a. f i • DOWNTOWN� : ® TC Transit Center a�f� .. // A(NLT INSET ?iK _ i"_' ••••Tigard City Boundary 5yy r Water I le x e .-.... .1 e_ r -- '14. Parks , , ® ifs .♦ i v • T w 1 !f 0 ,.r r_ ,L._._....:7 r--..-- I ill* " —i- © h ce r LIli 1 ..... t �Sy i t•-... .......,.r` ... WAt-- 1 ♦♦♦♦ �<\lip 1 `1/1.,a,'' (�•� i••••J-••��• ----� t ,f GAARDE ST ,,,v-° MCDONALD ST I ILr+1 :, _ a6 ----B,e r See Figure 5-12 • BONITA RD' `i L --- BULL MOUNTAIN RD • _ m� -3sn for 2017 updates "° � •r•' x to Tigard Triangle • . Planned F!... .ax. Improvements `L111 c 0 0 _ �.�� 1El ii • - +gyp ,aa...t.,,.,,..,�, BEEF BEND RD DURHAM RD1111 ®i �� 39 r - m •t'�yQ —If: .. mi•• ••. � Mil Tua:un River coon vnan ;. ,...•,-- F. 5 "The inf<.met.on repres<n1W o2 Nie map is curnnt<a of Febm.ry 28.2010- . Crossing M4 l // a<.I.Irns ,ct.:be male r. w r• Tonquin Trail ea ro • to Tualatin 0 0.125 0 25 p 5 dxm' mrndmrnrs occu dmr,eth<INconrent of the mep. L"" '}+ N„,,,„ Y DOWNTOWN 1 0 TAYLORS FERRY RD \ Figure 5-9 1 INSET �0 N �•.®. /� Transportation . `� B ' e Improvements i 1 o • ►' !• y . z /, ' 1 e a F43- a _ Tigard Urban i /r Gs i .. �- Planning Area 1 �� SS 6'L '�• FRO FO c+or. 9iF i > W 58 O 4' l49, 7 SCHo -ts FE i w 2t' OAK ST Existing Facilities i B6a it 1' 1 _ i a .... rompw4....PI Major Roads 16,441) ��I ¢ 66d Local Roads • { `i N O , —Multi-Use Path r _ : .a. > 1 27 FAN�{JO CR PARK : 1 NORTH DAKOTA ST ® < Future Facilities 't_..._.. ..i!..�... .._..._..._. ..� .._ 4O F „ �®S♦ ---i �" MDQ i #k Intersection Project w m 95 �y 8 ♦ ..._ ��\.. sT c O _.._�. __� 65 +' ^ HAINES NY Roadway Project m Q 2 A \`® 0� .- _. �) � Corridor Si C h. ••�•• p z 52 38 HCT ale BC - �i+;� DARTMOUTH ST A ii WALNUT ST -....:1-- __ Off ,. , •••• Neighborhood Path di X54 WAlNU1 ST 49. ~ �. 1 4� a Road Improvements a xwcww .�.yy I(� i ..� M-, �A�'l'G INSET 11��NIi Road(incldImpprove ent 4 C6 6 �1 s'Y �" Pit .0 i Q4'.., d bike facdnies> ° -i.:------- CC Complete Streets Y - •f P • 66..• • (adds sidewalks and _ - 4 27 `�Tt . . ', 5 bike lanes) o .<\ / ®i.>....._....1........illif ki♦ - �,\. -Sidewalk • f ♦♦ Bike Lane J �, n) ♦i♦ �® 4 S. Bike Boulevard CO, K I Q _ WAEI ST ♦i�♦ ` all New Facilities qd-O ` GAARDE ST ` m MCDONALD S7;vigil O♦ ••• New Road R 1:7-' 14"" 1 - 66k ! �♦ f • (cludespedestrian Le--� • ♦ and bike faclities) 15 I v BULL MOUNTAIN RD No aoxva : See Figure 5-12 ••• Multi-Use Path —1.,„ • BONITAgCD3�=36a az for 2017 updates • • Other Map Elements r•t sz� •� ni C > 3 to Tigard Triangle CI a6 ••• N Planned Transit Center z o Improvements •••'Tigard City Boundary ,o ---- B _ m a Water w ( a '^ (6 Parks I �J BEEF BEND RDS 66n DURHAM RD F0�10 O4b t•a C�55 R F ••Q, ElB •moi ••The infonnetion represented on this ,-4. • s, I // e' n a TOrquin Trail p wrtmtas of February 28,21110. � to Tualatin B ons will b< made ex now NEAR-TERM PROJECTS „i � al �snramendmo is neem in niter ;,, the content of the map. i _..._...moo,.1_ DOWNTOWN 0 I ` 5? 25 TAYLORS FERRY RD Figure 5-10 Ak ,® .= - Transportation a,, M2 �- ® ; r e !W 1 - Improvements T� I o� �� ♦ • , i, t•♦ P10' Tigard Urban ♦♦ �'Os• 1iL-�,7YI �'eG i !� ' s Planning Area • ,PvNe;c AG,P2y ♦• ....�/ �1{OLL FERRY co M r,�,_•„ > 58 ,'® B30 B-- a W MIAOAK ST Existing Facilities es ■/ • • w ! PC -9Zjsr�a%♦ 1 © S '�,ar► :„.9 v 90 PIN• Major Roads �� A4 0 I I ��` ,aiippi,r1V..._ 66d, -Local Roads _^ ♦ t 1 NMulti-Use Path z7 ■■FANNOCR PARK • S1 1 r• NORTH DAKOTA ST ® J.CID . f•. f Future Facifitiea o • Q9 a ' J®�I• _ ' 4M Intersection Project h n � _ L .PC9 �� > HAINES i 11'‘,,,, s o� m 1 1 - -� - m��♦ ��-,r,l '"..2 El .(50 El Roadway Project se ��1 ac - , .661 0 N le. ^ HCT Corridor r-- P - UT 1•� ® DARTMOUTH S 1 v\ WALNUT ••- Neighborhood Path �O BC5 Rgi(T 52� 51��Ir • vnan LN ST m 1® � x Road Improvements 't'lA DOWNTOWN a. •�.._.� \ -�. -' �q INSET 11'Coy.? a: Road Improvement 'l'Gl � / #p ——m (includes pedestrian 0 1:i r1 c{'- B r /- S} C ,v[XIV ! f' ® m and bike facilities) 2 r t Complete Streets I i p. -. ...r�'r' f ®-O (adds sidewalks and a _ ,-I i 4 bike lance) o p r- ff ._. �i.:a,. .. .. .. ♦ it' Sidewalk LJ L;w 6- - - ocan.M a fir . \' /-F \' -- ti' -.Nal Bike Boulevard ......-. R K Q - Wpll sT %♦ New Fadtkk, 111 49 �• 5 �G �� ' ` '� i• . GAARDE ST �66k 46 wPC MCDONAI D$f O ,` ♦% I ••• New Road K .,rte (ncludes pedestrian i.� 661 a ,n 324J ♦♦ and bike facilities) B16 - - '_s „- "�r"`""� See Figure 5-12 •• Multi-Use Path �I BULL M011N lAIN HU , •• o BONITARD — m • I he 82s ` ;C3 36a 36b for 2017 updates ', , I Pz7r'r••--P2,`---+ > 3 to Tigard Triangle w' E i i i ! Q 0- Planned N : I i . 66w •••• d a Other Map Elements • r I o ® . s Improvements 5 > .___ m m W a 'ii mJ J n e N raps r Transit Center lir 6 ____ I _ u •---Tigard City Boundary p • LL V,O •, ».,.»..« BEEF BEND RD 66 TSM DURHAM RD '307 -- ;;-r ® yF4,,'Paa10 ® :. 6 39 1 X40 ♦ •aF, NIF 8• 0--m ♦♦• 5• �® ii — • • gi M3 •• �, �.' Tualatin River® r£ t // -•The icurrent einformation represented„n '• •• Crossing ""' me , il-h w 28.2010. • Torguin Trail to Tualatin 0 0X25 0 2`.� 0 5 Revisions ill he eek a% new NEAR&MID-TERM PROJECTS n to alter Me<leont d t ru•..y Miles 'I• f s�,h map. m. j. m1 TAYLORSFERRYRD A Figure 5-11 •DOWNTOWN 0 1 . r INSET. ®/ ®� 25 ' 1 � w N ® ,mom /Iii� _._ Transportation ® ��`� 4.6. ( e m ; Improvements G ♦ RY a: w P®••2�e W • Tigard Urban `1 �A9 �Ze • �. en'. i..-Gl.__ r.... Planning Area 111111 ' e.P 9 ®`/ 1 64, ELS FER R• worewaonr G9F• > ru 58 �.. _ �P 2y 11110. SCHO w ® OAK ST- Existing Fa4ilities ® yp 1 _ w is O m PI Major Roads a► u ID �� 1 ♦ O • 66d Local Roads t4411 FANNO CR PARKT ♦ ' ® .\ •• ,j L iol �� Multi-Use Path 27 m _ 1 \ i NORTH DAKOTA STEll Future Facilities • ••—•••—•••—•••— ..'•••—•••—•••—•••—.. ••— Q� L. - : w HAINESSr g# Intersection Project J r L ''•• o �s �0�� _I ml ..-.._� �el: ,,a;:" %if®576..•••.0®�•(50 • ## Roadway Project �Yo,A c$� �,�� E $.", m ... ■�_�` 1 HCT Condor '-.- 1 - • - \� DARTMOUTH S7 9.- Wnl Nu7 ST 7��- �012;.�.1,.., I �66i .� 52 51 (r '••• Neighborhood Path ossv�rw Pol., 54 WALNUT ST 48 ~ •17341r �® �� L." x Road Improvement. i 1 .actio.,. it, DOWNTOWN, 11�,G _ _ Road Improvement r NST I INSET r 4, _._ m (includes .stria, .. I•t. ,•.{Pr1 f A--j y sTA El,P.��. I e. • ® and bice sella Estella].) "...--''. � ,: 1 �—.— ` sf I Complete Streets CC I 3 T Y t f+•. • •• (adds sidewalks and a e...a - .27 • —T 2 r.; j i � i LT) \ 5 bike lanes) i. ...� �.�fIt]� 3P �' +....•••,Sidewalk j,_,Z) : J a 0 I g \ e ♦♦ a ® —Bike Lane MS/'/-/ / �� ae4G ® B11 ---f �' Bike Boulevard f 0 ♦♦ 'POS I" h. ` GAARDE ST 66k 46 / WALL g. 4.4_ �cw NacllRka 0 y ` -C MCDONALD ST 60 44- New Road ••• (includeswRo paieainan ei - e ,f ,824a°. N", and bike facilities) Bta I? r y Ia^ La \• )111114r See Figure 5-12 ••• Multi-Use Path BULL MOUNTAIN lel) • I rzs P27 o BONI7ABC3 ssa 36b for 2017 updates n a t i.,,, Pb011ier Map Elements P27 i•' N' V > to Tigard Triangle > r a a Planned Tt: TransitCenter . ..♦ C.-,i i— 66 • op •• z < ...•Tigard Ci Bounds _ 3 ° g Improvements g City a oN i - �`_ I _ „/_-^ ----'j • n_-..._� l Q w a Water -- .. to w w I `.♦ v _ _ ■ L.1, Parks ♦ , QO 11r i . ® � BEEF BEND RD 66n -- T$1 DURHAM RD' m F L.�- 6 J m 35 �y • •••Ft •♦♦ �5O 1 • N ••••••'•Jae• '. I ♦ El ° a M3 e♦�i �i I Tualatin River® CQ•a T'ua ' S ••The information represented on this c• Crossing ' // map is current as of February 28,2010. ' Torpuin Trail ALL PROJECTS ( • to Tualatin tie°tai°"^ will be male °' new �,/ • decisions mendmenk occur to alter the 1 tent of the map. ' Y Figure 5-12 —I . , --i 66d g — - m 66elt i Z\ Tigard Triangle N Planned Improvements — 12, `• •� Tigard urban Planning Area I66fExisting andPlanned Facilities' PFAFFLE .., / \,.. 1\ Existing Street 660 �M1O�• - n PlannedStreet1 Existing Trail 66g, I•♦• . ° _ 19 — CO/ ATLANTA I 3 Planned Trail M I � ...... BAYLOR I ° I Future Path 66C z i 2 I — Bike Lane(Both Sides) i II M Bike Lane(East Side) 66b aoi / .. • = CLINTON I Planned Intersection (Locanonlllustrative) Ci 1 -11: 38 )I( •. •• F •••• Planned Improvements „.00, --\ i • S�, ......• • o O Intersection Project O •••• •• ELMHURST iti i-———I 1 ® Street Project s ~ /�u� ••r•• HERMOSO I i /^l Trail Project '-'"' FRANKLIN 5 • TSM3 I I- I ._ .._N • BEVELAND x I•••• I l / 1 N 1 i." I M11• I cr Tigard City Boundary >1\4.. 6'0 I • M GONZAGA i ; • N2i Fq1 HAMPTON I a II I I ——— I a All existing streets should include pedetrian and bicycle facilities consistent with adopted standards. .- but many gaps exist.Facility gaps arc not shown I on this map but should headdress.'at the time of devclopmentor through the city's capital improvement program. This map is provided for illustrative purposes.The complete list of projects is provided in Table 5-6. WALL 11111 i1ANil • 5 ' 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 ••The information represented on this map is current as of October 2.2017.Revisions will be made as new decisions or amendments occur Miles s, to alter the content of the map. III. Development Code Proposal (Dcn2017-00004) Chapters 18.650, 18.660, 18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments Proposed new text is underlined(and in bold and italics). Proposed deleted text is shown as strikethrough text. Chapter 18.650 TIGARD DOWNTOWN PLAN DISTRICT 18.650.070 Building and Site Design Standards 4. Weather protection. b. Awnings/marquees/canopies may shall project a minimum of 3 feet and a maximum of 6 feet from the facade(and may project a maximum of 4 6 feet into the public right-of-way)or the minimum sidewalk width along the building frontage, whichever is less.Any element that projects into the right-of-way is subject to approval by the city engineer. c. Marquees The element shall have a minimum 10-foot clearance from the bottom of the clement marquee to the sidewalk. Awnings and canopies shall have a minimum 8-foot clearance from the bottom of the awning or canopy to the sidewalk. 18.650.120 Signs Signs in the MU-CBD zone are subject to the standards and procedures in Chapter 18.435, Signs and shall utilize the MU-CBD zone sign standards in Subsection 18.435.130.H. A. S'gn standards. In addition to the requirements of Chapter 4-8.435, Signs, the following standard:, shall be met: 1. Residential only developments within the MU-CBD zone shall meet the sign requirements for the R 40 zone, 18.435.130.B; nonresidential developments within the MU CBD zone shall meet the belowe. 2. The maximum sign area limits are: for all sign faces. b. Wall signs shall not exceed in gross area 15 percent of any building face on which the sign i:, c. All other signs area,requirements shall comply with Section 18.435.130.C. landscape areas. December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 2 of 39 Chapters 18.650, 18.660, 18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments 5. Blade signs are permitted as follows: a. One blade sign (above the walkway and under weather protecting awnings, marquees, and parapets)placed at each entrance to a building is allowed. b. Vertical dimension of a blade sign shall not exceed 1.5 feet and the width may not exceed 90 percent of the width of the weather protection, for a maximum sign area per sign of 4.5 square feet. c. The distance from the sidewalk or grade up to the bottom of the sign shall be at least 8 feet. d. The blade sign may be indirectly illuminated. 6. A projecting sign not greater than 32 square feet per face or a total of 61 square feet for all sign faces can project up to 4 feet into the public right of way with a 10 foot clearance of the right of way. 7. Pedestrian oriented roof/awning signs arc permitted as follows: a. Buildings with a height of 20 feet or leaf arc permitted to have 1 roof sign that extends above the upper surface of the awning structure or the roof line. b. The sign may not exceed 2 feet above the roof line and may not extend below the roofline. c. The maximum sign area is 15 square feet. d. The sign shall be oriented to the entrance of the building. c. The sign may be internally or externally illuminated. f. 1 pedestrian oriented roof/awning sign shall be permitted per tax parcel. (Ord. 10 02 §2) December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 3 of 39 Chapters 18.650, 18.660, 18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments Chapter 18.660 TIGARD TRIANGLE PLAN DISTRICT 18.660.020 Applicability A. Applicability. 3. Public rights-of-way. The standards in Section 18.660.090 apply to all existing, future, and proposed-public rights-of-way in the Tigard Triangle Plan District regardless of the zone. 4. The boundary of the Tigard Triangle Plan District is shown on Map 18.660.A. The TMU zone and C-G zone are also shown on this map and the official zoning map. All existing and future transportationTransportation facilities are shown on Map 18.660.B. 18.660.040 Review Process C. Land use review. 4. Adjustment application. An adjustment application shall be processed through a Type II procedure as provided in Section 18.710.060. b. An adjustment application shall be approved when all of the following approval criteria have been met for each requested adjustment: iv. The proposed adjustment is needed to address transportation network connectivity standards and includes, where practicable, pedestrian, bicycle, or vehicle transportation facilities. Transportation network connectivity standards are provided in Subsection 18.660.090.C.3. v iv—The proposed adjustment is for the removal of a district tree, and the applicant will pay the district tree removal fee listed in the city's Master Fees and Charges Schedule unless a finding is made that the proposed development site cannot be reasonably developed without removal of the district tree. District tree information and requirements are provided in Subsection I8.660.070.H. 18.660.050 Pre-Existing Development and Approvals C. Sites with pre-existing land uses. 1. A pre-existing land use that does not meet the land use standards in Section 18.660.060 may continue but shall not expand beyond the boundaries of the site that it occupied prior to the effective date of this chapter, except for any pre-existing land uses within the area bounded by 661h Avenue and 68th Avenue to the east and west and Dartmouth Street and Franklin Street to the north and south, respectively. Any pre-existing land uses within this area that do not meet the land use standards in Section 18.660.060 may continue and expand beyond the boundaries of the site that it occupied prior to the effective date of this chapter, but not beyond the boundaries of the area described above. 18.660.080 Building Design Standards D. Building projections.Building projections are allowed as follows: December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 4 of 39 Chapters 18.650, 18.660,18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments Figure 18.660.3 Building Projection Standards Building Projection Standards • — 1'max.projection into minimum building setback •---- 4'max.projection into public right-of-way IIIIIIIIIM •— 3'min.depth for required weather protection and 6'max.projection into public right-of-way it 8'min.vertical clearance Min. vertical clearance changed from 10' to 8' with addition of 6' max. projection into the public right-of-way. I 1 Private property Public right-of-way 2. Balconies or weather protection for pedestrians along building facades may project into the minimum building setback and public right-of-way as shown in Figure 18.660.3 above. Elements in the right of way shall Balconies may project a maximum of 4 feet and into the right- of-way. Balconies that project into the right-of-way shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 10 feet from sidewalk grade and are subject to approval by the city engineer. as shown in Figure 18.660.3 above. 3. Weather protection elements for pedestrians along building facades, such as canopies or awnings, may project into the minimum building setback and public right-of-way as shown in Figure 18.660.3 above. Weather protection elements may project into the right-of-way a maximum of 6 feet or the minimum sidewalk width along the building frontage, whichever is less. Elements that project into the right-of-way shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 8 feet from sidewalk grade and are subject to approval by the city engineer. 34. Signs may project into the minimum building setback and public right-of-way subject to the standards in Chapter 18.435, Signs Subsection 18.435.130.K1.c and approval by the city engineer. December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 5 of 39 Chapters 18.650, 18.660, 18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments 18.660.090 Transportation Facility Standards C. Transportation facility standards. 1. General standards. a. All transportation and associated utility improvements to be placed in a public right-of-way or public access easement shall: i. Except as expressly provided in this Subsection 18.660.090.0, meet the Meet the design standards of the city as provided in the Public Works Design Manual and Chapter 18.910, Improvement Standards; including but not limited to location, grade, width, materials, lighting, signage, and number and type of individual street elements as - . . .. and 2. Intersection design and spacing. c. New street intersections, including alleys, not shown on Map 18.660.B Transportation Network Map are subject to approval by the city engineer and require an access report. The city engineer shall specify the technical information that must be included in the report. At a minimum, the access report shall show that the proposed street intersection meets stacking, sight distance, and deceleration standards provided in the Public Works Design Manual or the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO)publications, or other standards as determined by the applicable road authority. between the centerlines of streets. Ta-ble 18.660.9 meet Street T,.* .: ..s "l Avenue, Pacific Highway 600 feet Dartmouth Street 200 feet All Other Streets 125 feet d. Clear vision standards in Chapter 18.930, Vision Clearance Areas, and street spacing standards in Chapter 18.910,Improvement Standards, do not apply to street intersections in the TMU zone. 3. Transportation network connectivity. a. Transportation Minimum required transportation improvements shall conform to are shown on Map I8.660.B Transportation Network Map.Additional transportation improvements for network connectivity may be required by Subsections 3.b. and 3.c below. Alleys are December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 6 of 39 Chapters 18.650, 18.660, 18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments encouraged but not required.Private streets are prohibited. b. Block perimeters shall be 2,000 2,500 feet or less in length as measured along the centerlines of streets, unless:. If this standard cannot be met due to topographical constraints, protected natural resource ar as, or existing-development patterns, a bicycle and pedestrian connection shall be required by Subsection 3.c.i below. i. It is not practicable to construct a street due to topographical constraints, protected natural resource areas, or existing development patterns, and the applicant has submitted an Adjustment application as provided in Subsection 18.660.040.0.4 and obtained the necessary land use approval;or ii A future street, path, or trail on Map 18.660.E Transportation Network Map provides for a possible future connection that is feasible at the time of the proposed development and meets the block perimeter standard when included as part of the block perimeter measurement. c. Bicycle and pedestrian connections include off street trails and paths as defined in Subsection I.!' , Bicycle and pedestrian connections are required where the addition of a connection would link the end of a permanent turnaround to an adjacent street or provide a midblock connection through a long block. A midblock connection is required where at least one block face is 800 feet or more in length. A required connection must go through the interior of the block and connect the block face that is 800 feet or more in length to its opposite block face. Bicycle and pedestrian connections include off-street trails and paths as described in Subsection 18.660.090.C.4.d. i. Where the intersection spacing or block perimeter standards cannot be met, a bicycle and pedestrian connection shall be provided every 330 feet or less. ii. Where addition of a connection would provide a midblock connection between a block face that exceeds 800 feet or would link the end of a turnaround to an adjacent street. 4. Transportation facility design. a. Street design. All streets are subject to the design standards in Table 18.660.10 18.660.9 below and as shown in Figure 18.660.5, except for Dartmouth Street, 72nd Avenue, and Pacific Highway, which and the future business access street parallel to Pacific Highway that connects the western portion of Atlanta Street to the future 74`x'Avenue. Dartmouth Street, 72nd Avenue, and Pacific Highway are subject to the design standards in Chapter 18.910, Improvement Standards.Subsection 18.910.030.E. The future business access street is subject to the standards in Subsection 18.910.030.E, specifically the local street standard shown in Figure 18.910.6.A. Table 18.660. 9 Street Elements and Widths Street Element Width Notes December 12,2017 (City Council Draft) Page 7 of 39 Chapters 18.650, 18.660, 18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments d. Pedestrian facilities. iv. Sidewalks shall have a minimum unobstructed width of 6 feet for pedestrian through- travel, except for A-frame signs where the minimum unobstructed width is 4 feet. Any permanent structures or utilities within the required through-travel area are subject to approval by the city engineer. Any sidewalk area outside of the required through-travel area may be used for commercial purposes by adjacent development or may contain pedestrian amenities, such as street furniture, bicycle parking, trash cans, and drinking fountains. Use of this area for commercial purposes includes, but is not limited to: customer seating, merchandise display, and A-frame signs signage. Use of this area for commercial purposes is at the sole discretion of the director. A-frame signs are also subject to the standards and procedures in Chapter 18.435,Signs. 18.660.100 Sign Standards Signs in the TMU zone are subject to the standards and procedures in Chapter 18.435, Signs and shall utilize the MU CBD TMU zone sign standards in Subsection 18.435.130.0 18.435.130.H. December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 8 of 39 Chapters 18.650, 18.660, 18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments Map 18.660.B Tigard Triangle Transportation Network IMMr.INII...■.. - -- -- --•--I- mai�► ill Tigard Triangle JI alu.. i NSI i •iiipi IP Transportation Network Ma iM 11 ,- Si Adoili um mi•ammem_7,,,- -__=-- , __ -!al l---,17, 61.1.111111.111 Ih' -•#;--- 11- ■ I Future street intersection locations iIS and future street.path,and trail I Ill 'Sag .41. ii 110f I alignments are illustrative.All future 7 ..• transportation facilities are subject • i Business access street added --9 to change based on development I 1 _� review,final design,engineering � ( , 1 \� and permitting by the applicable 1 iiii Illi II •_ �- i approval authority. V� �G`��p? ■ am 111 sr— m ,IN A l Iv i IG'.�'- ;• \=Pig - in 1:z r , ._..i. , , /1 Mil min ., ;i"46, it . _ , II , „,,,,, •:, • .... ,,,,,, • • Ill - ' ' '' III - ' a gillL. • I,t," i ••• pRrMo�rki`sT Future path alignment _ / r U M • changed to provide a • - ! 111 SIV ■ more direct connection • • Iff I between 72nd Ave and ; - e ml II 74t'' Ave ......•' I. anQ 7 fi• d, ■ �� _ II * J `� i go �� 1 Stu y I lem.- _ � , 4111 MI --- --1) i - - '__ MI• • —N ! zr� !.• am it • I` • �! Li • aim LI 4•41, III r i � i ‘111111A4111:* a/ 1kER R� , •••• I • r I am Transportation Facilities eillphk ' r� g 11� • I Existing Street no um■ Future Street 1111111111111111111i � n m Future Path i Existing Trail 1 ---- 1 111 1 Future TrailPIN 4 --- BikeLane (Both Sides) I svill yik i* • --- Bike Lane (East Side) 112 i AEI `� �! i Alleys(Encouraged) iv � • In Tigard Triangle Plan District ( I f -- 4 December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 9 of 39 Chapters 18.650, 18.660,18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments Map 18.660.B Tigard Triangle Transportation Network Chapter 18.435 SIGNS 18.435.010 Purpose 18.435.012 Effective Date of this Chapter 18.435.015 Definitions 18.435.020 Permits wed 18.435.030 Approval Process 18.435.040 Approval Period 18.435.050 Inspections 18.435.060 Permit Exemptions Signs 18.435.070 Prohibited Signs 18.435.080 Sign Illumination 18.435.085 Sign Measurement 18.435.090 Special Condition Signs 18.435.100 Temporary Signs 18.435.110 Nonconforming Signs 18.435.120 Removal of Nonconforming and Abandoned Signs 18.435.130 Base Zone Regulations 18.435.140 Sign Code Adjustments 18.435.010 Purpose A. General purposes. The purposes of this chapter are: 1. To protect the health,safety, property and welfare of the public; 2. To promote the neat,clean,orderly and attractive appearance of the community; 3. To accommodate the need of sign users while avoiding nuisances to nearby properties; 4. To ensure€of safe construction,location,erection and maintenance of signs; 5. To prevent proliferation of signs and sign clutter;and 6. To minimize distractions for motorists on public highways and streets.,; 7. To regulate solely on the basis of time,place and manner of a sign,not on its content.-;trod 8_B. S'a i ftv. In addition, it is the purposc of this chapter to To regulate the design, quality of materials, construction, location, electrification, illumination and maintenance of all signs visible from public property or from public rights-of-way. B_C. Compliance with other laws and regulations. It is not the purpose of this chapter to permit the erection or maintenance of any sign at any place or in any manner unlawful under any other ordinance,or state or federal law.(Ord.04-03) 18.435.012 Effective Date of this Chapter December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 10 of 39 Chapters 18.650, 18.660, 18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments All references made in this chapter to the effective date of this chapter shall mean November 9, 1983, unless otherwise specifically stated in an ordinance revision. 18.435.015 Definitions A. Definitions. These definitions are specific to this chapter and are in addition to Chapter 18.30, Definitions. 1. "`A' frame A-frame sign" ::.. - : -. :. . •_ . •_•. -See "Temporary sign." 2. "Abandoned sign" - A structure not containing a message or image for 90 continuous days or a sign not in use for 90 continuous days. 3. "Area"-See Section 18.435.085 for definition of sign area. 4. "Awning sign"-A wall sign incorporated into or attached to an awning. 5. "Balloon"-See"Temporary sign." 6. "Banner"-See"Temporary sign." 7. "Bench sign" -A bench designed to seat people with a sign painted or affixed on the surface. 8. "Billboard" - A freestanding sign in excess of the maximum size allowed, with adjustments, in the locations where it is located or proposed to be located. 9. "Building face" - All street-facing wall areas in one or more parallel planes, including windows and building projections. 10. 9—"Cultural institution auxiliary sign" - A sign placed and maintained by, or on behalf of, a subordinate commercial use in a cultural institution. 11. -1 "Cutout" - Letters, figures, characters and/or representations in cutout or irregular form attached to or superimposed upon a sign. 12. "Directional sign"-A permanent sign that is designed and erected solely for the purpose of traffic or pedestrian direction. 13. "Display surface" - The area made available by the sign structure for the purpose of displaying the message or image. 14. -1--3,"Electrical sign"-Any sign utilizing electrical wiring. 15. 4 "Electronic information sign" - A sign, :. . . , : ' - - .. •. : with lighted changeable copy or message lighted message:, that changes atn set intervals, each lasting more than two seconds, by electronic process or remote control. Electronic information •_- - • t: . . . : . .. . _ . . This type of sign is also known as an automatic changeable copy sign or electronic variable message center.An electronic information sign is not a reader-board sign or a rotating,revolving or moving sign. 16. —"Entryway sign"-A sign placed by or on behalf of the city at an entry to the city. December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 11 of 39 Chapters 18.650, 18.660, 18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments . •- planes. 17. "Flashing sign" - Any sign that is illuminated by an intermittent or sequential flashing light source with an whese interval cycle that is 2 seconds or less in duration, or is animated in any ethef way animated so as to create the illusion of movement without actual physical movement or the illusion of a flashing or intermittent light or light source. 18. "Flush pitched roof sign" -A type of wall sign attached to a mansard or similar type of vertically aligned roof. 19. "Freestanding sign" - A sign erected and mounted on a freestanding frame, mast or pole and not attached to any building. 20. "Freeway interchange" - Any intersection of an exit off-ramp of Interstate Highway 5 or State Highway 217 with a surface ci street. 21. "Freeway-oriented sign" - A sign primarily designed to be read by a motorist traveling on a highway designated by the Oregon State Highway Department as a freeway or expressway; specifically, these shall be Interstate 5 and Oregon State Highway 217, and shall not include Highway 99W. 22. "Immediate or serious danger a. Whenever any portion of the structure is damaged by fire, earthquake, wind, flood or other cause, and any member or appurtenance is likely to fail, become detached or dislodged, or to collapse and thereby injure persons or damage property; b. Whenever any portion of the structure is not of sufficient strength or stability or is not so anchored, attached or fastened in place as to be capable of resisting a wind pressure of 0.5 of that specified in the state building code for this type structure or similar structure,and will not exceed the working stresses permitted in the state building code for such structures; or c. Whenever the location of the sign structure obstructs the view of motorists traveling on the public streets or private property, and thus causes damage to property or thereby injures persons. 23. "Industrial park" - A parcel of land which complies with the requirements in Chapter 18.130, Industrial Zones. 24. "Lawn sign"-See"Temporary sign." 25. "Lighting methods"_ a. Direct lighting is where the light source is plainly visible on the sign face and not concealed within or separate from the sign. Examples include neon tube lighting and light- emitting diodes on an electronic information sign; Direct exposed lighting or neon tubes on the sign face; December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 12 of 39 Chapters 18.650, 18.660, 18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments b. c. Indirect or external Indirect or external lighting is where the light source is separate from the sign face or cabinet and is directed so as designed to shine on the sign;and c. d. Internal Internal lighting is where the light source is concealed within the sign face or cabinet and is designed to illuminate the sign from within. 26. "Maintenance" -Normal care needed to keep a sign functional such as cleaning, oiling,changing and repair of light bulbs and sign faces.Does not include structural alteration. 27. "Nonconforming sign" - A sign or sign structure lawfully erected and properly maintained that would not be allowed under the sign regulations presently applicable to the site. 28. "Non-structural trim" - The moldings, battens, caps, nailing strips and latticing, letters and walkways that are attached to a sign structure. 29. "Painted wall decorations" - Displays painted directly on a wall, designed and intended as a decorative or ornamental feature.Decorations may also include lighting. 30. "Painted wall highlights" - Painted areas that highlight a building's architectural or structural features. 31. "Painted wall sign"-A sign applied to a building wall with paint and that has no sign structure. 32. "Premises" - One or more lots on which buildings or site improvements may exist that are constructed or on which are to be constructed a building or a group of buildings designed as a unit. 33. "Projecting sign" - A sign attached to a building other than-a wall sign in which the sign face is not parallel to the wall. Such sign shall not project above the wall of the building to which it is .. .. ., or any portion of a sign, attached to a building that is not parallel to the building face or that projects more than 18 inches from the wall plane of the building face. A projecting sign may be attached to a wall or a building projection, such as a marquee, balcony, or awning; however, the amount of the projection shall be measured from the wall plane in all cases and not the building projection to which the sign may be attached.A projecting sign shall not extend above the building face to which it is attached,except where there is an existing parapet. 34. "Reader-board sign" - Any sign with changeable copy or a--message that is changed manually not electronically.,except A reader-board sign is not an electronic information signs. 35. "Roof line" - The top edge of a roof or building parapet, whichever is higher, excluding any cupolas,chimneys or other minor projections. 36. "Roof sign" - A sign erected fully upon or directly above a roof line or parapet of a building or structure. Exceptions: include approved temporary balloons, signs attached to existing architectural futures and flush mounted"roof'signs. 37. "Rotating, revolving or moving sign" - Any sign, or portion of a sign, whichthat moves in any manner,including but not limited to movement caused by wind,machines,or persons. December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 13 of 39 Chapters 18.650, 18.660,18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments 38. "Shopping center"-Developments A development of not less than 8 business units. 39. "Shopping plaza"-Developments A development of between 2 and 7 business units. 40. "Sign" - Materials placed or constructed primarily to convey a message with symbols, logos, letters, or other displays and that can be viewed from a the public right-of-way, another property or€fem the air. 41. "Sign Projection"-The distance by which a projecting sign extends from a building. 42. "Sign structure"-Any structure that supports or is capable of supporting any sign as described in the state building code. A sign structure may be a single pole and may or may not be an integral part of a building. Sign structures are not buildings. 43. "Structural alteration" - Modification of the size, shape or height of a sign structure. Also includes replacement of sign structure materials with other than comparable materials, for example metal parts replacing wood parts. 44. 4-"Temporary sign" - Any sign, banner, lawn sign or balloon which that is not permanently erected or permanently affixed to the ground or any cign structure, sign tower,the ground or a or building: a. Balloon an inflatable, stationary temporary A balloon sign is an inflatable, stationary sign anchored by some means to a structure or the ground. Includes Examples include simple children's balloons,hot and cold air balloons,blimps and other dirigibles; b. Banner A banner is a sign made of fabric or other nonrigid material with no enclosing framework; c. _. - • .. . . ._ . . . ' . - . .. - A lawn sign is a rigid sign supported by one or more sticks, posts, or rods inserted into the ground or a weighted base:or, or A requirements provided the size requirements in Section 18.135.060 can be met. A lawn sign provided in Section 18.135.100. d. An A-frame sign is a freestanding sign with two possible sign faces supported by a rigid frame in the shape of an "A." . 45. 4$—"Wall sign" - Aay sign attached to, painted on, or erected against or painted on the wall plane of a building face or structure with the exposed face of the sign in a plane parallel to the building face and that projects 18 inches or less from the wall plane of the building face. 46. "Window sign"-A sign placed on the inside of a window. A sign placed on the outside of a window is considered a wall sign. December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 14 of 39 Chapters 18.650,18.660,18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments 18.435.020 Permits Reed A. Compliance with regulations. No sign or sign structure shall hereafter be erected, re-erected, constructed, structurally altered or relocated within the city limits except as provided by this chapters and a permit for the same sign or sign structure has been issued by the approval authority. B. Separate permits for each sign. A separate permit shall be required for ach new sign or signs. modification of signs, or to legalize signs fer each business entity. A separate permit shall be required for each group of signs on a single supporting structure. B. Sign permits. 1. All permanent signs shall require a sign permit, except those that are exempted by Section 18.435.060. All temporary signs shall require a temporary sign permit as provided by Section 18.435.100, except those that are exempted by Section 18.435.060. A-frame signs allowed by Subsection 18.435.130.H.6 shall be treated as permanent signs for permitting purposes. 2. Each sign or group of signs on a single supporting structure, including sign alterations not exempted by Section 18.435.060,shall require a separate sign permit. 3. All sign permits shall be reviewed through the approval process provided in Section 18.435.030 below. C. Compliance with state building code. Separate stfectural permits under the state building code shall also apply.Building permits.All signs are subject to the provisions of the state building code where applicable.A building permit may be required enforcing agency subject to the provisions of the state electrical code. Electrical permits. All signs are subject to the provisions of the state electrical code where applicable.An electrical permit shall be required for all illuminated signs. E. Retroactive sign permits. The director may require application for sign permits for all signage at a given address if no existing permits previously had been approved or documented.(Ord.09-13) 18.435.030 Approval Process A. Approval process. Permits for new signs,modification of existing signs, or to legalize signs for which --- , - . ' . _.• ._ :, Sign permits, including temporary sign permits, shall be processed through a Type I procedure, as provided in Section 18.710.050, using the requirements of this chapter as approval criteria. 18.435.040 Approval Period A. Approval period. Sign permit approval shall be effective for a period of 90 days from the date of approval. B. Lapse of approval.The sign Sign permit approval shall lapse if: 1. Substantial construction of the approved plan permit has not begun within the 90-day period;or December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 15 of 39 Chapters 18.650,18.660,18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments 2. Construction on the site is a departure from the approved permit. C. Extension of approval. The director approval authority shall, upon written request by the applicant, grant an extension of the approval period not to exceed 90 days provided that: 1. No changes are made-ef proposed to the original approved sign permit plan-; 2. The applicant can show intent of initiating construction of the sign within the 90-day extension period;and 3. There have been no changes in the applicable policies and ordinance provisions and state building code provisions on which the approval was based. 18.435.050 Inspections A. Construction inspection. General requirements for the inspection of signs during and following construction: 1. All construction work for which a permit is required shall be subject to an inspection by the building official in compliance with the state building code and this chapter: a. A survey of the lot or proposed location for sign erection may be required by the building official to verify compliance of the structure with approved plans;and b. Neither the building official nor the jurisdiction shall be liable for expense or other obligations entailed in the removal or replacement of any material required to allow inspection. B. Inspection requests. It shall be the duty of the person doing the work authorized by a permit to notify the building official that such work is ready for inspection. The building official may require that every request for inspection be filed at least 1 working day before such inspection is desired. C. Required interim inspections. 1. Reinforcing steel or structural framework of any part of the proposed structure shall not be covered or concealed without first obtaining approval of the building official; 2. Foundation inspections shall be made after all required excavations, form work and bolt settings are completed and ready to receive concrete; 3. All anchorages shall be left exposed for inspection; 4. Electrical inspection shall be made by the agency issuing electrical permits. D. Final inspections. Final inspection shall be called for by the applicant when all work is completed. This inspection shall cover all items required by the building official under state law or city ordinances such as the locations, landscaping if required, and general compliance with the approved plans and requirements of this title. December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 16 of 39 Chapters 18.650, 18.660, 18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments E. Director's inspection. The director is authorized and directed to enforce all of the provisions of this chapter: 1. All signs for which permits are required shall be inspected by the director;and 2. Upon presentation of proper credentials, the director may enter at reasonable times any building, structure,or premises in the city to perform any duty imposed upon the position by this chapter. 18.435.060 Permit Exemptions Signs A. Exemptions from permit requirements. The following signs and operations shall do not require a sign permit but shall conform to all other applicable regulations of this chapter and the requirements in Subsection B below of this section: 1. Lawn and A-frame signs in residential zones. , which do not exceed the maximum allowable area on one premises regardless of the number of signs, as follows: a. Multiple lawn and A-frame signs are allowed per premises, b. The total maximum sign area for lawn signs in the R-1, R-2, R-3.5, R-4.5, and R-7 zones shall be 12 square feet per sign face and A total of 24 square feet in residential zones;for all sign faces per premises. The total maximum sign area for lawn signs in all other residential zones shall be 24 square feet for all sign faces per premises, c. b. A frame signs shall be no greater than 6 square feet per face in any residential zone. The total maximum sign area for A-frame signs in all residential zones shall be 6 square feet per sign face and 12 square feet for all sign faces. A-frame signs may be displayed only between the hours of 8 a.m. and 6 p.m., and Lawn signs shall not exceed 12 square foot per face in the R 1,R 2,R 3.5,R 1.5,and R 7 zones. _Lawn and A-frame signs in residential zones shall be placed on private property and not within the public right-of-way nor shall such signs obstruct or the clear vision area as provided in Chapter 18.930, Vision Clearance Areas;- frame signs arc permitted only between the hours of 8 a.m. and 6 p.m.; 2. Signs not oriented or intended to be legible from a right-of-way,other property=or from the air; 3. Signs inside a building, except for strobe-lights flashing signs visible from a right-of-way, other property=or from the air; 4. Painted wall decorations; 5. Painted wall highlights; 6. Window signs; Signs affected by stipulated judgments to which the city is a party, entered by 7. Directional signs on private property or directional signs in the public right-of-way that are legally erected by or on behalf of a government agency or road authority; December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 17 of 39 Chapters 18.650, 18.660, 18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments 8. Interior window signs; Flags displayed from permanently located freestanding or wall-mounted flagpoles that are designed to allow the flags to be raised and lowered; 9. Sign repair, maintenance, or change of copy or message that does not involve a change of sign size, height,type, or location;and 10. Signs affected by stipulated judgments to which the city is a party that is entered by courts of competent jurisdiction. 9. Nothing in this title shall prevent the erection, location or construction of directional signs on private property when such signs arc solely designed to direct pedestrians or vehicular traffic while on the parcel of real property on which the signs arc located. No sign permit or fee shall be required for such signs; and 10. Nothing in this title shall prevent the erection, location or construction of signs on private 'shall any public agency or utility be prohibited from erecting signs on private property when otherwise permitted.No sign permit or fee shall be required for such signs. B. Requirements for exempted signs. All signs exempted from sign permits requirements in Subsection A above shall meet the following requirements: 1. The sign shall be erected All signs shall be placed on private property with the consent of the lawful possessor of the property owner. No sign shall and shall not be placed on utility poles or in the public right-of-way except where expressly allowed; and 2. _ -- .. el of land; additional signs on such parcel shall be Multiple signs shall be allowed per premises and be spaced at least 50 feet apart in residential zones and 30 feet apart in all other base zones. C. Nothing in this title shall prevent the erection, location, or construction of signs on private property where such erection, location, or construction is required by any law or ordinance. Nor shall any public agency or utility be prohibited from erecting signs on private property when otherwise authorized. No sign permit or fee shall be required for such si•ns. - . -• • - - provisions of this section shall not apply to repair, maintenance or change of copy on the same sign for the use of changeable copy), or unlawfully erected or maintained signs. (Ord. 01 02) 18.435.070 Prohibited Signs, A. Prohibited display of flags and banners. It is a violationef this chapter to erect or maintain strings of , .• - . -- , .. lights, clusters , ' , - . .. flashing or blinking lights, flares, balloons and similar-devices of carnival character. Exceptions include: 1. National,state and institutional flags properly displayed; 2. Signs and banners approved as temporary signs; and 3. Balloons as allowed in 18.435.090.C. December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 18 of 39 Chapters 18.650, 18.660, 18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments A_1-Unsafe signs or improperly maintained signs. No sign shall be constructed,erected,or maintained unless the sign and sign structure is se-constructed, erected,and maintained as to be able to withstand the wind, seismic,and or other applicable requirements as specified in the state building code or this title. B . .• . • - •.- Unauthorized traffic signs. No sign shall be erected at intersections of any with Chapter 18.930, Vision Clearance Arms of this title: 1. No sign shall be erected at any location where, by reason of the position, shape or color, that interferes with, obstructs the view of, or could be confused with any authorized traffic sign, signal,or device by reason of position,shape,or color; and 2. No sign shall be erected that makes use of the word"stop,""look,""danger,"or any other similar word, phrase, symbol, or character ' that is likely to interfere with, mislead,or confuse motorists. C 4;$ 0bseenity Obscene signs. No sign shall bear or contain statements, words, or pictures in which the dominant theme of the material, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest in sex or is patently offensive because it affronts the contemporary community standard relating to the description or representation of sexual material -. . .. •_ D. E. Traffic oObstructing signs. /. No sign or sign structure shall be constructed or located in such a manner or at such a location that it will that obstructs access to any fire escape or other means of ingress or egress from a building or any exit corridor, exit hallway,or exit doorway. No sign or supporting sign structure shall cover, wholly or partially, any window or doorway in any manner that it-will substantially limits access to the building in case of fire or other emergency;and: 2. No sign or sign structure shall be erected at any street intersection that obstructs clear vision as provided in Chapter 18.930, Vision Clearance Areas. F. Bare li_ t bulbs. Strings of bare lights shall net be constructed, meted, or maintained within view of - . - .. . '- -- • . xcept if designed as part of a structure's architectural design. This subsection shall not apply to lighting displays as-desetibed in subsection A.2 of this section. E €—Roof signs. Roof signs of any kind are prohibited,except for temporary balloon signs allowed by Section 18.435.100 and pedestrian-oriented roof signs allowed by Subsection 18.435.130.H. ; F. 1-1—Revolving, rotating, or moving signs. Revolving, rotating, or moving signs of any-kind are prohibited,except for flags allowed by Subsection 18.435.060.A.6 or temporary banners or balloons allowed by Section 18.435.100. G 1--Flashing signs. Flashing signs of any kind are prohibited, including but not limited to strobe lights. •_ . . . . ... - --.. -- . . . .. . _ . -- intensity, with each interval in the cyele lasting 2 seconds or less. Exposed reflective type bulbs, strobe lights,rotary beacons, par spots, zip lights,or similar devices shall bo prohibited. December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 19 of 39 Chapters 18.650, 18.660, 18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments sign with changeable message characteristics. H. Right-of-way signs. Signs in the public right-of-way in whole or in part are prohibited, except or signs legally erected for informational purposes by or on behalf of a government agency, bench signs allowed by Subsection 18.435.090.B, awning signs allowed by Subsection 18.435.090.E, temporary banners allowed by Section 18.435.100,or signs allowed by Subsection 18.435.130.H.1.c in the TMU and MU-CBD zones.Any sign that projects into or is located in City of Tigard right-of- way is subject to approval by the city engineer. No sign shall project into or be located in Oregon Department of Transportation right-of-way. I ',Signs on a vehicle. Any sign placed Signs placed on or painted on a motor vehicle or trailer, as defined by ORS Chapter 801,with the primary purpose of providing a sign not otherwise allowed for by this chapter are prohibited. J #Billboards. Billboards are prohibited.(Ord. 09-13) 18.435.080 Sign Illumination A. Surface brightness. The surface brightness of any sign shall not exceed that produced by the diffused output obtained from 800 milliampere fluorescent light sources spaced not closer than 8 inches,center on center. B. No exposed incandescent lamps. Any exposed incandescent lamp that exceeds 25 watts shall not be used on the exterior surface of any sign so as to expose the face of such bulb or lamp to any public street or public right-of-way with the exception of electronic information signs. 18.435.085 Sign Measurement A. Projecting and freestanding signs. 1. The area of a freestanding or projecting sign shall include all sign faces counted in calculating its area. Regardless of the number of sign cabinets or sign faces,the total allowable area shall not be exceeded. 2. The area of the sign shall be measured as follows if the sign is composed of ono or more a. The area around and enclosing the perimeter of each sign cabinet,sign face,or module shall be summed and then totaled to determine total area. The perimeter of measurable area shall not include embellishments such as pole covers, framing and decorative roofing, provided there is no written advertising copy,symbols or logos on such embellishments; b. If the sign is composed of more than two sign cabinets, faces, sign facia or modules, the area enclosing the entire perimeter of all cabinets, faces, nnclor modules within a single, continuous geometric figure shall be the area of the sign. Pole covers and other embellishments shall not be included in the area of the sign measurement if they do not bear written advertising copy,symbols or logos; and December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 20 of 39 Chapters 18.650, 18.660, 18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments c. The overall height of a freestanding sign or sign structure is measured from the grade directly below the sign to the highest point of the sign or sign structure and shall include architectural and structural embellishments. B. Wall signs. I. The area of the sign shall be measured as follows: a. The area around and enclosing the perimeter of each sign cabinet,sib face,.or module shall be summed and then totaled to determine total area. The perimeter of measurable area shall not include embellishments such as pole covers, framing and decorative roofing, provided there is no written advertising copy, symbols or logos on such embellishments; b. If the sign is composed of individual letters or symbols using the wall as the background with or without added decoration, the total sign area shall be calculated by measuring the area within the perimeter of all symbols and letters or other decoration including logos; and c. Measurement of the wall area pertaining to flush pitched "roof'signs shall be calculated as if the sign were mounted directly on the wall face immediately below the sign_,— d. Measurement of the wall area pertaining to awning or canopy signs shall be calculated to include the vertical surface of the awning or canopy on which the sign is to be mounted and the wall surface of the structure to which it is attached. C. Awning Signs. 1. If an awning sign meets the definition of a wall sign as provided in Subsection 18.435.015.A.,it shall be measured as a wall sign as described in Subsection 18.435.085.B above as if the sign were mounted directly on the building face. 2. If an awning sign meets the definition of a projecting sign, it shall be measured as a projecting sign as described in Subsection 18.435.085.A above. 18.435.090 Special Condition Signs A. Applicability. Speer Special condition signs shall have special or unique dimensional, locational, illumination, maximum number or other requirements imposed upon them in addition to the regulations contained in this chapter. B. Bench signs. 1. Bench signs shall only be wed allowed at designated transit stops in commercial, industrial,. and the R-12, R-25 and R-40 zones where no bus shelter exists: a. No more than 1 bench sign per--allewab1e shall be allowed per transit stop; b. Placement of the bench sign shall not interfere with pedestrian traffic or be located within a vision clearance area or a public right-of-way except where approved ..nle otherwise by the city engineer; December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 21 of 39 Chapters 18.650, 18.660, 18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments c. Application for a bench sign shall include the signature of the affected property owner, proof of liability insurance,. and any required permits from the state highway division or Washington County, where applicable; and d. The sign area shall be limited to a total of 14 square feet. C. Balloons. 1. 1 inflatable, stationary balloon or I cl-ster of children's balloons firmly secured shall be allowed only if all of the following conditions are met: a. A sign permit is obtained for each single or cluster of balloons; b. Each owner or legal occupant of property or a building shall be allowed 1 balloon per year; c. A balloon sign shall be allowed to remain up for a period of no longer than 10 days per year; d. A permit issued for a balloon will serve as I of the 3 sign permits allowed per business in a calendar year; c. Balloons may be permitted as roof signs with a sign permit; f. The size of a balloon shall not exceed 25 feet in height; and g. The balloon shall be secured to a structure on the ground and shall not be allowed to float in the air higher than 25 feet above the nearest building roof line. C D. Electronic message centers.Electronic information signs. 1. Electronic message center (variable message) sign regulations shall be subject to all of the following restrictions: L n -Electronic message center information signs shall be wed allowed only in the C-G, MUC, TMU, and MU-CBD zones, and at schools that front an arterial street where the sign is not less than 200 feet from an abutting residential use and is oriented to the arterial street. 2. The standards for electronic information signs in TMU and MU-CBD zones are provided in Subsection 18.435.130.H.1.a. 3. The standards for electronic information signs in all other zones and for schools are provided below. a_b—The maximum height and area of an electronic message center information sign shall be as provided in Section 18.435.130 and any other applicable standards of this title. b. c-,----Electronic message center,information signs shall may not be allowed to substituted for a nonconforming sign or mounted upon a nonconforming sign or sign structure, unless the sign and sign structure are brought into compliance with all of the provisions of this title..i c_d—An electronic message center information sign may shalt be allowed to substitute for 1 freestanding sign or 1 wall sign except in the MUC zone where an electronic message center December 12,2017 (City Council Draft) Page 22 of 39 Chapters 18.650, 18.660,18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments information sign may only be substituted for 1 freestanding sign and no other sign type. Electronic message centers An electronic information sign shall not be allowed to substituted for any other sign types as provided in this title, and shall not be allowed to replace or supplement a billboard, freeway oriented sign, or any other sign types other than those specifically allowed above.= electronic message center information sign shall be allowed per premises;and e. With regard to light patterns: i. Traveling light patterns("chaser effect")shall be are prohibited;,and ii. Messages and animation shall be displayed at intervals of greater than two seconds in duration. D. E. Freestanding freeway-oriented signs. 1. For signs requiring a permit under the Oregon Motorist Information Act, the city will determine through a Type I procedure whether the sign meets all applicable city standards and provide that determination to any applicant for a state permit consistent with ORS 377.723. 2. Freeway-oriented signs shall ott/.1 be allowed permitted only in the C-G, TMU, I-P, I-L and I-H zones. 3. Freeway-oriented signs shall be perms e located within 200 feet of Highway 217 and/or Interstate Freeway-Ne 5 rights-of-way. 4. 1 freed freeway-oriented sign shall be allowed per premises. 5. The maximum height of a freeway-oriented sign shall not exceed 35 feet from the ground level at its base. 6. For freestanding signs a total The maximum sign area of a freeway-oriented sign shall not exceed 160 square feet per face f or or 320 square feet for all faces. 7. Freeway-oriented signs shall be oriented to be viewed from the freeway. 8. In addition to a freeway-oriented sign, each parcel, development complex,. or premises shall be allowed 1 freestanding sign provided all other provisions of this chapter can be met and both signs are located on separate frontages with different orientations. 9. Freeway-oriented signs are only allowed as freestanding signs and are not permitted allowed as any other sign type. roof,tenant,temporary,balloon,wall and awning signs. E h:Awning signs. 1. Awning signs shall be penuitted allowed in all base zones.Regardless of how an awning sign is measured, as provided in Subsection 18.435.085.C, the total awning sign area counts toward the total wall sign area allowance as provided in the applicable base zone sign regulations in Section 18.435.130,except for awning signs in the TMU and MU-CBD zones. The total awning sign area in these zones counts toward the total projecting sign area allowance as provided in December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 23 of 39 Chapters 18.650, 18.660, 18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments Subsection 18.435.130.H.4. 2. The standards for awning signs in TMU and MU-CBD zones are provided in Subsection 18.435.130.H.4. 3. The standards for awning signs in all other zones are provided below. a_27—The copy on awning signs may shall not extend above the upper surfaces of the awning structure. They may be hung below the awning if the sign clears the sidewalk by at least 8.5 feet; b_3--Awning signs may be internally or externally illuminated; and c_4—Where approved by the city engineer, awning Awning signs may extend into the public right-of-way 6.5 feet or 2/3 of the distance to the roadway, whichever is less. However, no sign may shall extend within 2 feet of the roadway nearest vehicle travel lane. F 6—Flush pitched"roof'signs. 1. Flush pitched roof signs shall be allowed in all base zones except residential zones; 2. The face of flush Flush pitched roof signs may shall not extend more than 6 inches above the roof line; 3. Flush pitched roof signs shall be parallel to the building face and shall . They may not extend beyond the sides of the building face wall. Such surfaces shall he considered part of a wall 4. Flush pitched roof Such-signs shall only be attached to a mansard or other near vertical roof where the roof angle is greater than 45°from horizontal; and 5. Flush pitched roof signs are a type of wall sign, and all All code provisions applicable to wall signs shall also be applicable apply to this type of sign. GI—Painted wall signs. Wall signs, including symbols or logos, which are painted directly onto the wall surface shall not exceed in gross wall area that the percentage normally allowed for a wall sign in that the applicable base zone; •. , •- . - ••-. •-• •- •:• -• - ---- ! -- - of the hcight of the wall. H. 4.—Entryway signs. Entryway signs shall be wed allowed in all base zones. I d--Cultural institution auxiliary signs. 1. Cultural institution auxiliary signs shall be permitted allowed in all base zones. 2. Cultural institution auxiliary signs are limited to 1 sign and shall be either within the same sign structure as another freestanding sign on the property where the cultural institution is located or on a wall of the primary building of the cultural institution. A wall sign shall be consistent in structure and materials with any existing wall sign on the cultural institution. The sign area of a December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 24 of 39 Chapters 18.650, 18.660, 18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments cultural institution auxiliary sign shall not exceed 4 square feet per face. (Ord. 10-04 §1; Ord. 06- 13, Ord. 06-09, Ord. 04-03) 18.435.100 Temporary Signs A. App 1 process. Permits for temporary signs net exempted by Section 18.435.060 shall be shall attach conditions to the permit for a temporary sign as necessary to ensure discontinuance of the compliance with the purpose of this chapter. A. Applicability. All temporary signs listed in Subsection 18.435.015.A.46 require a temporary sign permit except for the following: 1. Lawn and A-frame signs in residential zones exempted by Section 18.435.060. 2. A-frame signs in MU-CBD and TMU zones allowed by Subsection 18.435.130.H.6. B. Expiration. 1. A temporary sign permit shall be issued for a period of 30 days or less. The approval authority may attach conditions to the permit as necessary to ensure discontinuance of the use of the sign terminate within 30 days from the date of issuance; and 2. No permit shall be issued for a period longer than 30 days, but a A temporary sign permit may be reissued by the director approval authority for 2 additional permit periods of 30 days each per calendar year,except for balloon sign permits which may not be reissued. C. ]pes and locations. Types and locations-of temporary signs shall be as follows: Standards for all temporary signs, except balloon signs, that require a temporary sign permit by Subsection 18.435.100.A above are as follows: 1. A maximum of 1 temporary sign may be allowed at a time for each owner or occupant of property or building; The total number of temporary signs issued by permit shall not exceed 1 for any use at any one period of time; such signs are not permitted for single family and duplex dwellings. Exempted lawn signs in residential zones are not provided in this provision; 2. The total area of a temporary sign shall not exceed 24 square feet for all faces and no more than or 12 square feet per face, except for banners which shall not exceed 24 square feet per sign face • _ . - . - . . ... • . •- , •• . . . . . banner shall be no more than 24 square feet per face with the total sign arca not to exceed 24 square feet; 3. - - .! .• : •- - .. . •_ . . ... :; Temporary signs shall be located on private property; 4. Temporary signs shall not be located in the public right-of-way or the clear vision area as described in Chapter 18.930, Vision Clearance Areas, except for banners that may be hung across the right-of-way where approved by the city engineer; 5. Temporary signs shall not be illuminated in any way or utilize electrical wiring; December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 25 of 39 Chapters 18.650, 18.660, 18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments 6. Temporary signs shall not contain a reader-board or electronic information sign component; and 7. Temporary signs shall not be permanently attached to the ground, buildings, or other structures_ manager's designee; 5. A balloon as provided in 18.435.090.C. D. Standards for balloon signs that require a temporary sign permit by Subsection 18.435.100.A above are as follows: 1. A maximum of 1 stationary balloon or cluster of children's balloons may be allowed per calendar year for each owner or occupant of property or building; 2. A balloon sign may remain in place for a maximum of 10 days per calendar year; 3. A balloon sign may be allowed as a roof sign; 4. A balloon sign shall not exceed 25 feet in height or float in the air higher than 25 feet above the nearest building's roof line;and 5. A balloon sign shall be secured to a structure or the ground. authority. Exempted lawn signs shall be placed only on private property, outside of the public right of way, and may not obstruct the clear vision area. 'structures. (Ord. 04-02) 18.435.110 Nonconforming Signs A. Applicability. For the purposes of this chapter, non-conforming signs will be defined as follows: 1. Except as provided in this chapter, signs in existence on March 20, 1978, in compliance with Ordinance Nos. 77-89 and 78-16, which do not conform to the provisions of this chapter, but that were constructed, erected or maintained in compliance with all previous regulations, shall be regarded as nonconforming signs that may be continued until March 20, 1988. 2. Signs in existence on January 11, 1971, which do not conform to the provisions of this chapter, but that were constructed, erected or maintained in compliance with all previous regulations,were regarded as nonconforming signs and could be continued for a period of 10 years from January 11, 1971. All such signs that were not brought into compliance with the standards in Ordinance Nos. 77-89 and 78-16 and the extensions granted, are now in violation of this chapter. December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 26 of 39 Chapters 18.650, 18.660, 18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments 3. Signs located on premises annexed into the city after January 11, 1971, which do not comply with the provisions of this chapter, shall be brought into compliance with this chapter within a period of 10 years after the effective date of the annexation. 4. Any sign that is structurally altered, relocated or replaced shall immediately be brought into compliance with all of the provisions of this chapter, except the repairing and restoration of a sign on site or away from the site to a safe condition. Any part of a sign or sign structure for normal maintenance shall be permitted without loss of nonconforming status. B. Restrictions. For purposes of this chapter, a sign face or message change shall be subject to the following provisions: 1. A sign face or message change on a nonconforming sign is not allowed as an alteration when the affected property and sign structure have been abandoned for greater than 90 days; 2. A sign face or message change shall be allowed as an alteration only for existing conforming signs and for nonconforming signs prior to their amortization expiration date;and 3. No sign permit shall be required for allowable sign face or message changes. C. Reconstruction. Should a nonconforming sign or sign structure or nonconforming portion of structure be destroyed or repaired by any means to an extent of more than 50 percent of its replacement cost, it shall not be reconstructed except in conformity with the provisions of this chapter. D. Requirements for conformance. Signs in existence on the effective date of this chapter that do not comply with provisions regulating flashing signs; use of par spotlights or rotating beacons; rotating and revolving signs; flags, banners, streamers, or strings of lights, or temporary or incidental signs; shall be made to conform within 90 days from the effective date of this chapter. (Ord. 04-03) 18.435.120 Removal of Nonconforming and/or Abandoned Signs A. Conformance required. All signs erected after the effective date of this title, which are in violation of any provisions of this chapter, shall be removed or brought into conformance upon written notice by the director. B. Removal. All signs that do not comply with this chapter, but were erected prior to the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter, shall be removed or brought into conformance within 60 days from written notice by certified mail given by the director. C. Enforcement. If the owner of sign, building, structure or premises fails to comply with the written order, the director may then cite the owner into court subject to Chapter 18.20, Administration and Enforcement.The following exceptions apply: 1. Section 18.435.110 provides for certain time limits and other conditions for certain signs as described therein. 2. Any sign that by its condition or location presents an immediate or serious danger to the public, by order of the building official, shall be removed or repaired within the time the building official mai spesi€y specifies. In the event the owner of such sign cannot be found or refuses to comply with the order to remove,the building official shall then have the dangerous sign removed and the owner cited for noncompliance and recovery of any damage or expense. December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 27 of 39 Chapters 18.650,18.660,18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments 3. All temporary signs shall be removed as provided in 1-8.435.100.8.1, or in the case of temporary .I. D. Responsible party for removal. Any person who owns or leases a nonconforming or abandoned sign or sign structure shall remove such sign and sign structure when the expiration of the amortization period for the sign(s)as provided in Section 18.435.110 has occurred or the sign has been abandoned: 1. if the person who owns or leases such sign fails to remove it as provided in this section, the director shall give the owner of the building, structure or premises upon which such sign is located,60 days'written notice to remove it; 2. If the sign has not been removed at the expiration of the 60 days'written notice, the director may remove such sign at cost to the owner of the building,structure or premises; 3. Signs that are in full compliance with sign regulations,which the successor to a person's business agrees to maintain as provided in this chapter, need not be removed in compliance with this section; and 4. Costs incurred by the city due to removal, may be made a lien against the land or premises on which such sign is located, after notice and hearing, and may be collected or foreclosed in the same manner as liens otherwise entered in the liens docket of the city. 18.435.130 Base Zone Regulations A. R-7, R-4.5, R-3.5, R-2 and R-1 zones. No sign shall be permitted allowed in an the R-7,R-4.5,R-3.5,R-2,or R-1 zone except the following: 1. Wall sign(s)may shall not exceed a combined total area of 4 square feet; 2. Every housing complex shall be allowed 1 permanent freestanding sign at each entry point to the housing complex from the public right-of-way, with the site properly landscaped, and not exceeding 32 square feet per face in area. Illumination may be approved provided it does not create a public or private nuisance, as determined by the director considering the purpose of the zone; 3. Every platted subdivision shall be allowed 1 permanent, freestanding sign at each entry point to the subdivision from the public right-of-way,with the site properly landscaped and not exceeding 32 square feet per face in area. Illumination may be approved provided it does not create a public or private nuisance,as determined by the director considering the purpose of the zone; 4. For nonresidential uses, 1 illuminated or non-illuminated freestanding sign not exceeding 6 feet in height and 32 square feet in area per sign face for uses approved through the site development review or conditional use process will shall be perms allowed. Wall signs may shall not exceed 5 percent of the gross area of the wall face on which the sign is mounted; 5. Directional signs on private property when such signs are solely designed to identify driveway entrances and exits for motorists on adjoining public streets will shall be wed allowed. 1 sign with an area of 4 square feet per face shall be wed allowed per driveway. Such signs shall be consistent with Chapter 18.930, Vision Clearance Areas; December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 28 of 39 Chapters 18.650, 18.660,18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments 6. Temporary signs in compliance with Sections 18.435.090 and 18.435.100; 7. Lawn signs in compliance with Subsections 18.435.060.A.1,A.6,and B.2; 8. Special condition signs in compliance with Section 18.435.090;and 9. Additional permitted allowed signs include awning sign(s)and painted wall sign(s). B. R-12, R-25 and R-40 zones. No sign shall be permitted allowed in the R-12, R-25 or R-40 zone except for the following: 1. Wall sign(s) may shall not exceed a combined total area of 1 square foot per dwelling unit-arid 2. Every housing complex shall be allowed 1 permanent freestanding sign at each entry point to the housing complex from the public right-of-way, with the site properly landscaped and not exceeding 32 square feet in area per sign face. Illumination may be approved provided it does not create a public or private nuisance, as determined by the director considering the purpose of the zone; 3. Every platted subdivision shall be allowed 1 permanent freestanding sign at each entry point to the subdivision from the public right-of-way, with the site properly landscaped, and not exceeding 32 square feet in area per sign face. Illumination may be approved provided it does not create a public or private nuisance, as determined by the director considering the purpose of the zone; 4. For nonresidential uses, 1 illuminated or non-illuminated freestanding sign not exceeding 6 feet in height and 32 square feet in area per sign face for uses approved through the site development review or conditional use process 3.444 shall be peed allowed. Wall signs may shall not exceed 5 percent of the gross area of the wall face on which the sign is mounted; 5. Directional signs on private property when such signs are solely designed to identify driveway entrances and exits for motorists on adjoining public streets shall be periled allowed. 1 sign with an area of 4 square feet per face shall be wed allowed per driveway. Such signs shall be consistent with Chapter 18.930, Vision Clearance Areas; 6. Temporary signs in compliance with Sections 18.435.090 and 18.435.100; 7. Lawn signs in compliance with Subsections 18.435.060.A.1,A.6,and B.2; 8. Special condition signs in compliance with Section 18.435.090;and 9. Additional peed allowed signs including include awning sign(s)and painted wall sign(s). C. C-G zone and MU CBD ncs. No sign shall be pefmitted allowed in the C-G zone and MU CBD zones except for the following: 1. Freestanding signs shall have certain are subject to the following,limitations and conditions when permitted on properties in C G and MU CBD zone,: December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 29 of 39 Chapters 18.650, 18.660, 18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments a. l multi-faced, freestanding sign shall be permitted allowed, subject to conditions and b. A reader-board assembly may be an integral part of the freestanding sign, c. The maximum square footage of signs shall be 70 square feet per face or a total of 140 square feet for all sign faces. No part of any freestanding sign shall extend over a property line into the public right-of-way space, d. The sign area may be increased 1 square foot for each lineal foot the sign is moved back from the front property line to which the sign is adjacent. If the street is curbed and paved, the measurement may shall be taken from a point that is 15 feet from the pavement. This increase in sign area is limited to a maximum of 90 square feet per face or a total of 180 square feet for all faces,and e. Freestanding signs located next to the public right-of-way shall not exceed 20 feet in height. Height may be increased 1 foot in height for each 10 feet of setback from the property line or a point 15 feet from the edge of pavement, whichever is less, to a maximum of 22 feet in height; 2. Wall signs. a. Wall signs, including illuminated reader-boards, may be erected or maintained but shall not exceed in gross area 15 percent of any building face on which the sign is to be mounted, b. Wall signs may shall not project more than 18 inches from the wall or extend above the wall to which they are attached,and c. If it is determined through the site development review process that the wall sign's visual appeal and overall design quality would be served, an additional 50 percent of the allowable sign area may be permitted allowed.No copy will shall be permitted allowed,however, in the additional area permitted. For purposes of this subsection, "copy" includes symbols, logos, and letters; 3. Directional signs on private property when such signs are solely designed to identify driveway entrances and exits for motorists on adjoining public streets. 1 sign with an area of 4 square feet per face shall be permitted allowed per driveway. Such signs shall be consistent with Chapter 18.930, Vision Clearance Areas; 4. Electronic message centers information signs in compliance with Subsection 18.435.090.0 18.135.090.D shall be permitted; 5. Temporary signs in compliance with Sections 18.435.090 and 18.435.100; 6. Lawn signs in compliance with Subsections 18.435.060.E A.6;and B.2; 7. Special condition signs in compliance with Section 18.435.090; and 8. Additional permitted allowed signs ineluding include awning sign(s), flush pitched "roof' sign(s), freeway-oriented sign(s),tenant sign(s),projecting sign(s),and painted wall sign(s). December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 30 of 39 Chapters 18.650, 18.660, 18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments D. C-P zone.No sign shall be permitted allowed in the C-P zone except for the following: 1. Freestanding signs shall have certain are subject to the following limitations and conditions-when a. 1 multifaced, multi-faced freestanding sign per premises shall be permitted allowed per premises,subject to conditions and limitations as stated herein, b. A reader-board assembly may be an integral part of the freestanding sign, c. The maximum square footage of freestanding signs shall be 32 square feet per face or a total of 64 square feet for all sign faces. No part of any freestanding sign shall extend over a property line into the public right-of-way space, d. The sign area may be increased 1 square foot for each lineal foot the sign is moved back from the front property line to which the sign is adjacent. If the street is curbed and paved the measurement may shall be taken from a point that is 15 feet from the pavement. This increase in sign area is limited to a maximum of 52 square feet per face or a total of 104 square feet for all faces, and e. Freestanding signs located next to the public right-of-way shall not exceed 8 feet in height. Height may be increased 1 foot in height for each 10 feet of setback from the property line or a point 15 feet from the edge of pavement= whichever is less= to a maximum of 10 feet in height; 2. Wall signs shall have certain are subject to the following limitations and conditions when a. Wall signs, including illuminated readerbeards reader-board signs, may be erected or maintained but shall not exceed 5 percent in gross area of any wall face on which the sign is to be mounted, b. Wall signs shall be parallel to the face of the building upon which the sign is located,and c. If it is determined through the site development review process that the wall sign's visual appeal and overall design quality would be served, an additional 50 percent of the allowable sign area may be permitted allowed.No copy*AI shall be permitted allowed,however, in the additional area permitted. For purposes of this subsection, "copy" includes symbols, logos and letters; 3. Directional signs on private property when such signs are solely designed to identify driveway entrances and exits for motorists on adjoining public streets. 1 sign with an area of 4 square feet per face shall be permitted allowed per driveway. Such signs shall be consistent with Chapter 18.930,Vision Clearance Areas; 4. Temporary signs in compliance with Sections 18.435.090 and 18.435.100; 5. Lawn signs in compliance with Subsections 18.435.060.E A.6;and B.2; 6. Special condition signs in compliance with Section 18.435.090; and December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 31 of 39 Chapters 18.650, 18.660,18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments 7. Additional penni4ed allowed signs including include awning sign(s), flush pitched"roof' sign(s) and painted wall sign(s). E. C-N and C-C zones. No sign shall be permitted allowed in the C-N and C-C zones except for the following: 1. Freestanding signs shall have certain are subject to the following limitations and conditions when a. 1 .,.,,.'� multi-faced freestanding sign per premises shall be allowed per premises, b. A reader-board assembly may be an integral part of the freestanding sign, c. The maximum square footage of freestanding signs shall be 32 square feet per face or a total of 64 square feet for all sign faces. No part of any freestanding sign shall extend over a property line into the public right-of-way-spaee, d. The sign area may be increased 1 square foot for each lineal foot the sign is moved back from the front property line to which the sign is adjacent. If the street is curbed and paved the measurement may shall be taken from a point that is 15 feet from the pavement. This increase in sign area is limited to a maximum of 52 square feet per face or a total of 104 square feet for all faces, and e. Freestanding signs located next to the public right-of-way shall not exceed 20 feet in height. Height may be increased 1 foot in height for each 10 feet of setback from the property line or a point 15 feet from the edge of pavement= whichever is less to a maximum of 22 feet in height; 2. Wall signs shall have certain are subject to the followin' limitations and conditions when permitted on properties in the C N or C C zones: a. Wall signs, including illuminated reader boards reader-board suns, may be erected or maintained but shall not exceed in gross area 10 percent of any building face on which the sign is to be mounted, b. Wall signs shall be parallel to the face of the building upon which the sign is located, and c. If it is determined through the site development review process that the wall sign's visual appeal and overall design quality would be served, an additional 50 percent of the allowable sign area may be wed allowed.No copy will shall be permitted allowed,however, in the additional area permitted. For purposes of this subsection, "copy" includes symbols, logos and letters; 3. Directional signs on private property when such signs are solely designed to identify driveway entrances and exits for motorists on adjoining public streets. 1 sign with an area of 4 square feet per face shall be permitted allowed per driveway. Such signs shall be consistent with Chapter 18.930,Vision Clearance Areas; 4. Temporary signs in compliance with Sections 18.435.090 and 18.435.100; December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 32 of 39 Chapters 18.650, 18.660,18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments 5. Lawn signs in compliance with Subsections 18.435.060.E A.6;and B.2; 6. Special condition signs in compliance with Section 18.435.090;and 7. Additional permitted allowed signs including include awning sign(s),tenant sign(s), flush pitched "roof'sign(s),.and painted wall sign(s). F. Industrial zones. No signs shall be permitted allowed in the I-P, I-L= or I-H zone except for the following: 1. Freestanding signs shall have certain are subject to the following limitations and conditions: when permitted on properties in industrial zones; a. 1 multifaced, multi-faced freestanding sign shall be permitted allowed subject to conditions and limitations as stated herein, b. A reader-board assembly may be an integral part of the freestanding sign, c. The maximum square footage of signs shall be 70 square feet per face or a total of 140 square feet for all sign faces. No part of any freestanding sign shall extend over a property line into theyublic right-of-way-space, d. The sign area may be increased 1 square foot for each lineal foot the sign is moved back from the front property line to which the sign is adjacent. If the street is curbed and paved, the measurement may shall be taken from a point that is 15 feet from the pavement. This increase in sign area is limited to a maximum of 90 square feet per face or a total of 180 square feet for all faces,and e. Freestanding signs located next to the public right-of-way shall not exceed 20 feet in height. Height may be increased 1 foot in height for each 10 feet of setback from the property line or a point 15 feet from the edge of pavement, whichever is less, to a maximum of 22 feet in height; 2. Wall signs shall have certain are subject to the following limitations and conditions when a. Wall signs, including illuminated reader-board signs reader may be erected or maintained but shall not exceed in gross area 15 percent of any building face on which the sign is to be mounted, b. Wall signs okay shall not project more than 18 inches from the wall or extend above the wall to which they are attached,and c. If it is determined through the site development review process that the wall sign's visual appeal and overall design quality would be served, an additional 50 percent of the allowable sign area may be wed allowed.No copy will shall be wed allowed,however, in the additional area permitted. For purposes of this subsection, "copy" includes symbols, logos and letters; 3. Directional signs on private property when such signs are solely designed to identify driveway entrances and exits for motorists on adjoining public streets. 1 sign with an area of 4 square feet December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 33 of 39 Chapters 18.650, 18.660, 18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments per face shall be perms allowed per driveway. Such signs shall be consistent with Chapter 18.930,Vision Clearance Areas; 4. Temporary signs in compliance with Sections 18.435.090 and 18.435.100; 5. Lawn signs in compliance with Subsections 18.435.060.A A.6;and B.2; 6. Special condition signs in compliance with Section 18.435.090;and 7. Additional permitted allowed signs including include awning sign(s), tenant sign(s), freeway- oriented sign(s),projecting sign(s), flush pitched"roof'sign(s),and painted wall sign(s). G. Additional requirements in commercial and industrial zones, except signs subject to Subsection 18.435.130.H below. If it is determined through the site development review process that the sign's visual appeal and overall design quality would be served while maintaining the intent and purpose of this chapter, an additional 50 percent of the allowable sign area and 25 percent of sign height may be permitted allowed. No copy will shall be wed allowed in the additional area or height. For purposes of this subsection the word"copy"includes symbols, logos and figures,as well as letters. 1. Each freestanding sign shall be surrounded by an area set aside to protect the sign from vehicles maneuvering on the site negotiating in the parking area of the busincs5 and the area set aside shall be landscaped. a. The required site plan shall show the size and shape of the area set aside for the sign and the landscaping shall be represented on the plan required by permit and shall be subject to the review by the approval authority and control of the approval authority, through the site .. -- - ; and b. On existing sites where a landscaped area islandis not feasible, the minimum clearance between the lowest portion of a freestanding sign and the ground shall be 14 feet in any vehicle maneuvering area. 2. No freestanding sign, nor any portion of any freestanding sign, shall be located or project over any portion of a street, sidewalk or other public right-of-way or property unless an exception has been granted. 3. When a premises contains more than a single tenant but is not defined as a shopping center, the provisions of a freestanding sign shall take into consideration the need for providing a signing system that is harmonious in appearance and legible: a. The building owner shall provide, at his-awn the owner's expense, a common support for all tenant signage; and b. Up to an additional 50 percent of sign copy area may be permitted allowed through the site development review process so as to adequately identify the separate tenants when determined that the increased sign area will not be inconsistent with the purpose of this chapter. 4. Shopping centers or industrial parks shall establish a single signing format: December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 34 of 39 Chapters 18.650,18.660,18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments a. Up to an additional 50 percent of sign area may be pefmitted allowed through the site development review process to adequately identify the complex when it can be determined that the increased sign area will not be inconsistent with the purposes of this chapter; b. This increase should be judged according to unique identification needs and circumstances that necessitate additional area to make the sign sufficiently legible;and c. When a shopping center or industrial park has more than 1 main entrance on separate frontages, a second freestanding sign may be allowed through the site development review process. The 2 allowable signs shall face separate frontages and are not intended to be viewed simultaneously. 5. Legal owners or occupants of properties or buildings that are in shopping plazas and are directly located or ace proposed to be located,. on a commercially- and industrially-zoned corner property(ies) (one or more contiguous tax lots located at the intersection of two or more public streets), shall be allowed to have 1 freestanding sign along each street frontage when all of the following are met: a. A sign permit shall be required for each sign prior to its erection; b. The total combined height of 2 freestanding signs on the premises shall not exceed 150 percent of what is normally allowed for 1 freestanding sign in the same base zone; c. Neither of the signs shall exceed the sign height normally allowed in the base zone in which the signs are located; d. No more than 2 freestanding signs shall be permitted allowed; e. The 2 allowable signs shall face separate frontages and are not intended to be viewed simultaneously; and f. All other provisions of this chapter shall apply. 6. Shopping centers in the C-G zone shall be entitled to freestanding signage according to the following optional standards: a. A maximum of 2 freestanding signs shall be peed allowed per feadway street frontage provided they can meet both sign area and sign height requirements as provided in this subsection; b. The total combined height of 2 both signs shall not exceed 150 percent of the sign height normally allowed for 1 freestanding sign in the same base zone; however, neither shall exceed the height normally allowed in the same base zone; c. The total combined sign area €ec fy both signs shall not exceed 150 percent of what is normally allowed for one freestanding sign in the same base zone; however, neither shall exceed the area normally allowed in the same base zone; d. Neither sign shall pose a vision clearance problem or slial4 project into the public right-of- way;and December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 35 of 39 Chapters 18.650,18.660,18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments e. A sign permit shall be required prior to erection of any freestanding sign referred to in this subsection.(Ord. 10-02 §2; Ord.09-13) H. MU-CBD and TMU zones. The following signs are allowed in the TMU zone and the MU-CBD zone, except that MU-CBD properties with a Planned Development(PD) designation are subject to the residential zone sign standards in Subsection 18.435.130.B and MU-CBD properties north of Pacific Highway or with frontage on Pacific Highway or Hall Boulevard are subject to the C-G zone sign standards in Subsection 18.435.130.E 1. General provisions. a. Reader-board and electronic information signs are allowed as follows: 1. A freestanding sign,window sign, wall sign,or projecting sign may include a reader- board or electronic information sign component. ii. If a wall or projecting sign includes such a component,the reader-board or electronic information component shall be limited in size to 50 square feet or 50 percent of the area of the wall or projecting sign, whichever is less. iii. Messages and animation shall be displayed at intervals of greater than two seconds in duration. Traveling light patterns("chaser effect")shall be prohibited. b. Sign lighting methods are allowed as follows: i. In addition to the sign lighting methods described in Subsection 18.435.015.A.25, backlighting is allowed as a type of indirect or external lighting where the light source is behind an opaque sign area and not directly visible from the front of the sign. ii. All signs may use indirect or external lighting.All indirect or external sign lighting shall be shielded, angled, or located such that it does not shine directly onto adjacent properties or public rights-of-way.Signs larger than 100 square feet that use indirect or external lighting shall also have shields with a cutoff angle of 90 degrees or greater to ensure that lighting is not directed upward. Only wall signs, window signs,or pedestrian-oriented roof signs may use internal lighting iv. No sign shall use direct lighting,except for electronic information signs and signs with neon tubes or comparable lighting tubes. c. Wall signs,projecting signs,and A-frame signs may project into or be located in City of Tigard public right-of-way as provided in Subsection 18.435.130.H below.Any sign that projects into the City of Tigard right-of-way is subject to approval by the city engineer.No sign shall project into or be located in Oregon Department of Transportation right-of-way. d Signs on fences,retaining walls,or walls serving the same purpose as a fence are prohibited except where specifically designed as entryway signs. 2. Freestanding signs,but not including freestanding freeway-oriented signs that are allowed as a special condition sign by Subsection 18.435.130.H8. December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 36 of 39 Chapters 18.650, 18.660,18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments a. One multi-faced freestanding sign is allowed per premises.A premises with more than one street frontage may have one sign per frontage. b. The maximum sign area shall be 32 square feet per sign face or 64 square feet for all sign faces. The maximum sign height shall be 3.5 feet,except for freestanding signs associated with a public multi-use trail which shall have a maximum sign height of 8 feet. e. A freestanding sign mar be located in the minimum building setback but shall not be located in the public right-of-war or the clear vision area as described in Chapter 18.930. 3. Wall signs,including painted wall signs and flush pitched roof signs. ci. Multiple wall signs are allowed per building face. b. The total maximum sign area shall not exceed 15 percent of the gross area of the building face. The maximum sign height shall be equal to the height of the building face and shall not extend above the building face, except for flush pitched roof signs which are subject to the height standards in Subsection 18.435.090.E The maximum horizontal projection shall be 18 inches. c. A wall sign may project into the minimum building setback and public right-of-way. The minimum vertical clearance for wall signs that project into the public right-of-way shall be 10 feet from sidewalk grade. 4. Projecting signs,including awning signs. a. One projecting sign is allowed per building.A building with more than one street frontage may have one sign per frontage. The maximum sign area shall be 32 square feet per sign face or 64 square feet for all sign faces.A building with more than one street frontage mai, have one sign on the building corner at the intersection of two street frontages in lieu of one sign per frontage. The maximum sign area for a corner projecting sign shall be 50 square feet per sign face or 100 square feet for all sign faces. b. A building mar have the following additional projecting signs: i. A building mar have one or more additional awning signs where awnings are provided on the building face that project at least 4 feet into the public right-of-war and occupy at least 50 percent of the width of the building face. The additional signage shall not exceed 32 square feet in size. ii. A building mar have one or more additional projecting signs where the signs are perpendicular to the building face,less than 4.5 square feet in size per sign face, and located less than 10 feet from sidewalk grade as measured from the top of sign. The number of additional signs shall not exceed the number of ground floor tenant spaces in the building. c. A projecting sign may project into the minimum building setback and public right-of-way. For signs that project into the right-of-way,the minimum vertical clearance for awning signs and signs less than 4.5 square feet in size per sign face shall be 8 feet from sidewalk grade. The minimum vertical clearance for all other projecting signs shall be 10 feet from December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 37 of 39 Chapters 18.650, 18.660, 18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments sidewalk grade. The maximum horizontal projection into the right-of-way shall be 6 feet or the minimum sidewalk width along the building frontage, whichever is less.A projecting sign shall not conflict with an existing or planned street tree. 5. Pedestrian-oriented roof signs. a. A pedestrian-oriented roof sign is allowed only on buildings with a height of20 feet or less. b. The maximum number of signs allowed shall be equal to the number of ground floor tenant spaces in the building. c. The maximum sign area shall be 45 square feet. The maximum sign height shall be two feet above the roof line of the building and shall not extend below the roof line of the building. d. The sign shall be oriented to the street upon which the building fronts. 6. A-frame signs. a. The maximum number ofA-frame signs allowed shall be equal to the number of ground floor tenant spaces in the building or the equivalent of one sign for every 30 linear feet of street-facing building facade, whichever is greater. b. The maximum sign area shall be 6 square feet per sign face or 12 square feet for all sign faces. The maximum sign width and height shall be 3 feet. c. An A-frame sign may be located on private property or in the public right-of-way adjacent to any premises by the person in control of those premises. Where the sign is located in the right-of-way, it shall be located so as to maintain a minimum unobstructed sidewalk width of 4 feet for pedestrian through-travel.It shall be located behind the curb or a minimum of 10 feet from the edge of the nearest travel lane where no curb is present.It shall not be located in the clear vision area described in Chapter 18.930 or where it conflicts with the use of any service area,driveway, water quality facility, bicycle parking area, or on-or off- street parking or loading area. It may be located in a landscape strip with approval by the city engineer. d. An A-frame sign shall only be displayed when the sign owner's business is open to the public. 7. Permit exempt signs,such as directional and window signs, are allowed as described in Subsection 18.435.060.A, except that the total maximum sign area of all window signs shall not exceed 25 percent of the gross window area on the building face. 8. Special condition signs, such as bench, cultural institution,entryway, and freeway-oriented signs are allowed as described in Subsection 18.435.090. Freeway-oriented signs are only allowed in the TMU zone adjacent to the Highway 217 or Interstate 5 rights-of-way. 9. Temporary signs,such as balloon, banner, and lawn signs are allowed as described in Subsection 18.435.100, except that A-frame signs are allowed as described in Subsection 18.435.130.H6. December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 38 of 39 Chapters 18.650,18.660,18.435(Underline/Strikeout Copy) Proposed Code Amendments I. Mixed-use zones except MU-CBD and TMU zones. Sign standards for the MUE,MUE-1,MUE-2, MUC,MUC-1,and MUR zones are located in their respective plan districts in Chapters 18.620 and 18.670. 18.435.140 Sign Code Adjustments A. Adjustments. 1. For all signs except those in the TMU zone, the The approval authority may grant an adjustment to the requirements of this chapter through a Type I or Type II procedure, as provided in Sections 18.710.050 and 18.710.070, using approval criteria in Subsection 18.790.030.B.6. 2. For all signs in the TMU zone, the approval authority may grant an adjustment to the requirements of this chapter through a Type II procedure, as provided in Subsection18.660.040.C.4,using approval criteria in Subsection 18.660.040.C.4.b. B. If an adjustment is granted, the rights thereby given to the applicant shall continue to exist and to belong to the applicant or any other owner of the land for a period of 1.5 years from the date of final approval: 1. If, at the expiration of 1.5 years from the date of approval, construction of the structure or initiation of the use giving rise to the need for the adjustment has not begun, the rights given by the adjustment approval shall terminate without further action by the city;and 2. Said rights shall also terminate at or after the expiration of 1.5 years from approval if, though commenced within 1.5 years, construction ceases and is not resumed within 60 days.(Ord. 09-13) December 12,2017(City Council Draft) Page 39 of 39 Attachment 3 1114: ' City of Tigard TIGARD Memorandum 4111111110 To: Honorable Mayor and City Councilors From: Susan P. Shanks, Senior Planner Re: Summary of Sign Code Proposal Tigard Triangle Lean Code Phase II (CPA2017-00002, ZON2017-00002,DCA2017-00004) Date: November 28, 2017 This memorandum summarizes the key changes being proposed to Chapter 18.435 Signs. It includes an executive summary, a detailed description of existing and proposed sign standards for five sign types, and a tabular comparison of existing and proposed sign allowances for all sign types. It should be noted that the existing sign allowances for properties in the Triangle Mixed-Use (TMU), Mixed-Use Central Business District (MU- CBD), and General Commercial (C-G) zones are the same except for the following differences: ➢ Freeway-oriented signs are allowed in the C-G zone along Highway 217 and Interstate 5. > Blade and pedestrian-oriented roof signs are allowed in the MU-CBD and TMU zones. Executive Summary Proposed increase in sign allowances for all properties in the TMU zone and most properties in the MU-CBD zone: • A-frame signs allowed on a permanent basis on private property or in public rights- of-way (ROW). • More signs explicitly allowed to project or be located in the public ROW. • Additional awning signage allowed if a certain amount of awnings provided. • Additional projecting signage allowed if pedestrian-oriented, e.g. blade signs • Electronic information and reader-board signs explicitly allowed in more situations. • Backlit signs explicitly allowed. Page 1 of 3 Proposed decrease in sign allowances for all properties in the TMU zone and most properties in the MU-CBD zone: • Freestanding signs still allowed but size and height allowances significantly reduced. For example, there are currently 10 pole signs (all over 10 feet tall) and 4 monument signs (all under 8 feet tall) on Main Street. All but one monument sign would become nonconforming with this proposal. • Window signs still allowed but with size restrictions. • Electronic information signs allowed in more situations but with some size restrictions. • Internally-lit freestanding signs no longer allowed. Other: • The proposed sign standards for the Mixed-Use Central Business District (MU-CBD) zone apply to properties south of Pacific Highway and north of Fanno Creek that do not have frontage on Pacific Highway or Hall Blvd. Sign standards for properties north of Pacific Highway or with frontage on Pacific Highway or Hall Blvd are not proposed to change,i.e. they will be subject to C-G zone sign allowances. • The existing sign standards for the General Commercial (C-G) zone allow freeway- oriented signs along Highway 217 and Interstate 5. Properties currently zoned General Commercial (C-G) that are proposed to be zoned Triangle Mixed-Use (TMU)will retain this sign allowance where located along Highway 217 and Interstate 5. Comparison of Existing/Proposed Standards for Five Sign Types A-frame Signs Existing Standards: • Not allowed in ROW • Allowed on temporary basis (90 days per calendar year) • 12 square feet/sign face Proposed Standards for TMU zone and most of MU-CBD zone: • Allowed in ROW • Allowed on permanent basis • 6 square feet/sign face with 3-foot maximum height • 1 sign/ground floor tenant or for every 30 feet of building frontage • Allowed when business is open to the public Awning Signs Existing Standards: • Counts as a wall sign for area calculation purposes Page 2 of 3 • Signs not allowed above awnings but may be allowed below with 8-1/2-foot clearance Proposed Standards for TMU zone and most of MU-CBD zone: • Counts as a projecting sign for area calculation purposes • Signs allowed above and awnings with 8-foot clearance • Additional awning signage allowed if provide awnings along 50% of width of building facade that project at least 4 feet into the ROW Blade Existing Standards: • Allowed in MU-CBD zone through Downtown Tigard Plan District not Sign Code • 4.5 square feet/sign face • 1 sign/building entrance Proposed Standards for TMU zone and most of MU-CBD zone: • Allowed in MU-CBD and TMU zones • 4.5 square feet/sign face • 1 sign/ground floor tenant Freestanding Existing Standards: • 70 square feet/sign face and 140 square feet for all faces • 20-foot maximum height • 1 sign/property (somewhat unclear) Proposed Standards for TMU zone and most of MU-CBD zone: • 32 square feet/sign face and 64 square feet for all faces • 3.5 feet maximum height • 1 sign/building • Electronic information sign component explicitly allowed Projecting Existing Standards: • 32 square feet/sign face and 64 square feet for all faces • Allowed to project 4 feet into ROW with 10-foot clearance Proposed Standards for TMU zone and most of MU-CBD zone: • 32 square feet/sign face and 64 square feet for all faces with blade and some awnings signs allowed in addition to this area allowance • Allowed to project up to 6 feet into ROW with 8-foot clearance for some sign types Page 3 of 3 Comparison of Existing and Proposed Sign Allowances in TMU and MU-CBD Zones Sign Types Existing TMU and MU-CBD Sign Allowances Proposed TMU and MU-CBD Sign Allowances A-frame See Memo See Memo Awning See Memo See Memo Billboards Prohibited *** Bench Allowed *** Balloon Allowed *** Banner Allowed *** Blade See Memo See Memo Cultural institution Allowed *** Driveway Allowed with size restrictions Allowed without size restrictions Electronic information Allowed as wall or freestanding sign Allowed as wall or projecting sign with size restrictions; Allowed as freestanding or window sign Entryway Allowed Flush pitched roof Allowed as type of wall sign *** Freestanding See Memo See Memo Freeway Prohibited Allowed in TMU Zone Lawn Allowed Painted wall Allowed with height restriction Allowed without height restriction Ped-oriented roof Allowed in MU-CBD Zone Allowed in MU-CBD and TMU Zones Projecting See Memo See Memo Reader-board Allowed as wall or freestanding sign Allowed as wall or projecting sign with size restrictions; Allowed as freestanding or window sign Roof Prohibited with exceptions *** Revolving Prohibited *** Wall Allowed(awning signs counted as wall signs) Allowed(awning signs not counted as wall signs) Window Allowed without size restrictions Allowed with size restrictions(25%of window area) Sign Lighting Methods Flashing Prohibited *** Internal Allowed for wall,window, ped-oriented roof,and freestanding Allowed for wall,window,and ped-oriented roof signs signs External Allowed *** Direct Unclear where allowed Allowed for electronic information, reader-board,and neon or similar Backlit Unclear where allowed Allowed Signs in ROW All Prohibited with one exception Allowed for A-frame, banner,wall,projecting,and awning signs *** No Change Proposed Attachment 4 71 City of Tigard TIGARD Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and City Councilors From: Susan P. Shanks, Senior Planner Re: Staff Recommendation to Modify Proposal to Address Public Comments Tigard Triangle Lean Code Phase II (CPA2017-00002, Z0N2017-00002,DCA2017-00004) Date: November 28,2017 Based on comments received after the Planning Commission hearing on November 6, 2017, staff recommends modifying the proposal as provided below. Additions are shown with underline, bold, and italicized text,and deletions are shown with 3trikcthrough text. The purpose of these modifications is to eliminate confusion and potential conflict between the transportation standards in Chapter 18.660 (Tigard Triangle Plan District) and Chapter 18.910 (Improvement Standards) and to clarify the city's expectations with regard to where new streets and pedestrian connections will be required. CHAPTER 18.660 TIGARD TRIANGLE PLAN DISTRICT 18.660.020 Applicability A. Applicability. 3. Public Rights-of-Way. The standards in Section 18.660.090 apply to all - ' '-:. . . .. :.: . ... . public rights-of-way in the Tigard Triangle Plan District regardless of the zone. 4. The boundary of the Tigard Triangle Plan District is shown on Map 18.660.A. The TMU zone and C- G zone are also shown on this map and the city's official Zoning Map. All existing and future tr-ansportatien-Transportation facilities are shown on Map 18.660.B. 18.660.040 Review Process C. Land use review. 4. Adjustment application. An adjustment application shall be processed through a Type 1I procedure as provided in Section 18.710.060. Page 1 of 4 b. An adjustment application shall be approved when all of the following approval criteria have been met for each requested adjustment: iv The proposed adjustment is needed to address transportation network connectivity standards and includes, where practicable, pedestrian, bicycle, or vehicle transportation facilities. Transportation network connectivity standards are provided in Subsection 18.660.090.C.3. v_i —The proposed adjustment is for the removal of a district tree,and the applicant will pay the district tree removal fee listed in the city's Master Fees and Charges Schedule unless a finding is made that the proposed development site cannot be reasonably developed without removal of the district tree. District tree information and requirements are provided in Subsection 18.660.070.H. 18.660.090 Transportation Facility Standards C. Transportation facility standards. 1. General standards. a. All transportation and associated utility improvements to be placed in a public right-of-way or public access easement shall: i. Except as expressly provided in this Subsection 18.660.090.0, meet the Moet the deaign standards of the city as provided in the Public Works Design Manual and Chapter 18.910, Improvement Standards; including but not limited to location, grade, width, materials, lighting, signage, and number and type of individual street elements as provided in this chapter,Chapter 18.910,and the Public Works Design Manual;and 2. Intersection design and spacing. c. New street intersections, including alleys, not shown on Map 18.660.B Transportation Network Map are subject to approval by the city engineer and require an access report. The city engineer shall specify the technical information that must be included in the report. At a minimum, the access report shall show that the proposed street intersection meets stacking,sight distance, and deceleration standards provided in the Public Works Design Manual or the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) publications, or other standards as determined by the applicable road authority. Street intersections are subject to the spacing standards in Table 18.660.9 below as measured between the centerlines of streets. • \,Iinimum Distance Between Street Street Int ti ns Avenue,Pacific Highway 600 feet Da...nieut Street 200 feet All Other Streets 125 feet Page 2 of 4 d. Clear vision standards in Chapter 18.930, Vision Clearance Areas, and street spacing standards in Chapter 18.910,Improvement Standards, do not apply to street intersections in the TMU zone. 3. Transportation network connectivity. a. sortation Minimum required transportation improvements shall conform to are shown on Map 18.660.B Transportation Network Map. Additional transportation improvements for network connectivity may be required by Subsections 3.b. and 3.c below. Alleys are encouraged but not required. Private streets are prohibited. b. Block perimeters shall be 27004 2.500 feet or less in length as measured along the centerlines of streets, unless:. If this standard cannot be met due to topographical constraints, protected natural required by Subsection 3.c.i below. i. It is not practicable to construct a street due to topographical constraints,protected natural resource areas, or existing development patterns, and the applicant has submitted an Adjustment application as provided in Subsection 18.660.040.C.4 and obtained the necessary land use approval;or ii. A future street, path, or trail on Map 18.660.B Transportation Network Map provides for a possible future connection that is feasible at the time of the proposed development and meets the block perimeter standard when included as part of the block perimeter measurement. c. Bicycle and pedestrian connections include off street trails and paths as defined in Subsection Bicycle and pedestrian connections are required where the addition of a connection would link the end of a permanent turnaround to an adjacent street or provide a midblock connection through a long block. A midblock connection is required where at least one block face is 800 feet or more in length. A required connection must go through the interior of the block and connect the block face that is 800 feet or more in length to its opposite block face. Bicycle and pedestrian connections include off-street trails and paths as described in Subsection 18.660.090.C.4.d. i. Where the intersection spacing or block perimeter standards cannot be met, a bicycle and pedestrian connection shall be provided every 330 feet or less. ii. Where addition of a connection would Provide a-midblock connection between a block face that exceeds 800 feet or would link the end of a turnaround to an adjacent street. 4. Transportation facility design. a. Street design. All streets are subject to the design standards in Table 18.660.10 18.660.9 below and as shown in Figure 18.660.5,except for Dartmouth Street,72nd Avenue, Pacific Highway,and the future business access street parallel to Pacific Highway that connects the western portion of Atlanta Street to the future 74th Avenue. Dartmouth Street, 72°a Avenue, and Pacific Highway are subject to the design standards in Subsection 18.910.030.E. Chapter 18.910, Improvement mss. The future business access street is subject to the standards in Subsection 18.910.030.E,specifically the local street standard shown in Figure 18.910.6.A. Page 3 of 4 Map 18.660.B Tigard Triangle Transportation Network —a Triangle s R1 ma� in1II . 1 : 11111/11 1 ill Id ,.— Transportation Network Map --j-7 um - Future street intersection locations _' ' � us A 1 I and future street,path,and trail 1011 `\_''t _ alignments are illustrative.All future 1 a.--.41111 i .... 0. _a . transportation facilities are subject ��`-� ', •—_>- to change based on development I ~ j m review,final design,engineering - 12/ and permitting by the applicable MI al 1 I .,tri �, I 11 approval authority. J ' 1. sig ,6� _! c. 1 Sir -1111111k \_,.., , • il 7 ,' '2 - .. I irc---,-------, - - i----;I -.7--- _ is: "Sr* . � . �•••"'• TMo N 7 i , �I Future path alignment r C changed to provide a i 111 jmore direct connection • �! - between 72nd Ave and ' ' ■ ■ z I74th Ave. .• 7i ri, r �, �, • ♦� i f �� +w ...7-".- „e i ( ' 1� \ : h— NI I 71$7 • � pr . i- Fi'iv., ••••, 177.,- or 41-'''.---. \N J , Transportation Facilities , k Existing Street n ` ! 1 , MO OM nn • Future Street .....-: ! Future Path H ! i i t i • i Existing Trail 1 j InlibiN Future Trail ! i f4 Bike Lane (Both Sides) L i • o. — — Bike Lane (East Side) 'A1 U • / V Alleys(Encouraged) i , I i I� • Tigard Triangle Plan District me I } V- S. \---_____--, t ! J Page 4 of 4 Attachment 5 11111 m " City of Tigard TIGARD Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and City Councilors From: Susan P. Shanks, Senior Planner Re: Summary of Public Comments Tigard Triangle Lean Code Phase II (CPA2017-00002, ZON2017-00002,DCA2017-00004) Date: November 28, 2017 The following comments were received on the proposal at or before the Planning Commission hearing on November 6, 2017. All comments are summarized below and attached. • Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) —Oct 9,2017 email ODOT requested a minor change to the proposed sign code to explicitly prohibit signs in ODOT right-of-way. Staff made the requested changes. • Jim Corliss, Landmark Ford—Nov 1 - 6, 2017 emails Staff met with Mr. Corliss at his offices on October 25, 2017 and discussed the differences between the new mixed-use zoning standards as compared to the existing general commercial zoning standards. Mr. Corliss requested a change to the Lean Code that would potentially allow him to expand his business to the one lot in his block that he does not currently own if he were to purchase it at some point in the future. Staff felt that this was a reasonable request and made the requested changes. Mr. Corliss asked multiple follow-up questions about how the proposed sign code and future street through his property would affect his business and future building plans. Staff answered his questions, and he requested no further changes. • Metro—Nov 1, 2017 letter Metro provided a letter in support of the city's efforts to rezone and spur development in the Tigard Triangle. The letter also commented on the city's need to comply with Title 6 of the Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan with respect to updating the Tigard Town Center boundary and developing a parking Page 1 of 2 Attachment 5 management plan. As a result, the adopting ordinance commits the city to completing these two tasks within a specific timeframe. • Steve DeAngelo, DeAngelo's Catering&Events—Nov 6, 2017 email Steve DeAngelo, a Downtown Tigard business owner and president of the Tigard Downtown Alliance, expressed his support for the proposed sign code changes in Downtown Tigard. • Base Camp I LLC—Nov 6, 2017 letter Base Camp, a Tigard Triangle property owner, expressed support for the Lean Code and noted some potential ambiguity between the new and existing transportation standards. Staff worked with Base Camp after the Planning Commission hearing to identify those provisions that were potentially confusing or conflicted with existing standards and prepared a memo for City Council that recommends specific modifications to the proposal in response to the identified issues. See Attachment 4 to this staff report for staff's recommended modifications. Page 2 of 2 Susan Shanks From: DANIELSON Marah B <Marah.B.DANIELSON@odot.state.or.us> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 4:35 PM To: Susan Shanks Subject: RE: Proposed Map &Code Amendments -- Tigard Triangle This looks good.Thanks for responding to ODOT's interest. Marah Danielson, Senior Planner ODOT R1 Development Review Planning Lead (503)731-8258 marah.b.danielson@odot.state.or.us From:Susan Shanks [mailto:SusanS@tigard-or.gov] Sent: Monday, October 09, 2017 4:51 PM To: DANIELSON Marah B Subject: RE: Proposed Map&Code Amendments--Tigard Triangle Hi Marah, How about this language? 18.435.130 Base Zone Regulations H. MU-CBD and TMU zones. 1. General Provisions. c. Notwithstanding the provisions of Subsection 18.435.070.x, certain signs may project into or be located in City of Tigard public right-of-way as provided below in Subsections 18.435.130.H.3.b (wall signs), 18.435.130.H.4.e(projecting signs), and 18.435.130.H.6.c(A-frame signs). No sign may project into or be located in Oregon Department of Transportation right-of-way. 18.435.070.K reads: 18.435.070 Certain Signs Prohibited K. Right-of-way. Signs in the public right-of-way in whole or in part, except signs legally erected for informational purposes by or on behalf of a government agency. Let me know if this works for you. Thanks! Susan P Shanks I Senior Planner Community Development Department I City of Tigard Email susans@tigard-or.gov Phone 503-718-2454 Fax 503-718-2748 1 From: DANIELSON Marah B [mailto:Marah.B.DANIELSON@odot.state.or.us] Sent: Monday, October 09, 2017 3:17 PM To:Susan Shanks Subject: RE: Proposed Map&Code Amendments--Tigard Triangle Thanks Susan. Lidwien is still leading our effort to review the TPR findings. Unfortunately, I will not be able to make the meeting on Wednesday. I did have another question/comment.The City's draft sign code indicates temporary signs, like A-frame signs, can be installed "in the public right of way" (Section 18.435.130(H)(6)) and that wall signs and projecting signs, including awning signs,can project into the public right of way(Section 18.435.130(H)(3) and (4)). Private advertising signing, including A-frame signs, banners,awnings, etc. may not be installed or encroach on ODOT right of way. Is it too late to have this reflected in the new code language? Marah Danielson, Senior Planner ODOT R1 Development Review Planning Lead (503)731-8258 marah.b.danielson@odot.state.or.us From:Susan Shanks [mailto:SusanS@tiBard-or.gov] Sent: Monday, October 09, 2017 8:03 AM To: DANIELSON Marah B Cc: RAHMAN Lidwien;JENSVOLD Martin R;TAYAR Abraham * Avi; BROOKING Joshua C; Buff Brown Subject: RE: Proposed Map&Code Amendments--Tigard Triangle Hi Marah, Our consultant,Scott Harmon from DEA, sent over the draft TPR analysis to Lidwien and Avi last week. We are meeting to discuss it this Wednesday, Oct 11,at 4pm. I will be preparing the Planning Commission staff report the week of Oct 23 for posting on Oct 30. I would appreciate receiving any comments by end of day on Tuesday,Oct 24, at the latest. Give me a shout if you don't think that will be possible. Thanks, Susan P Shanks I Senior Planner Community Development Department I City of Tigard Email susans@tiBard-or.gov Phone 503-718-2454 Fax 503-718-2748 From: DANIELSON Marah B [mailto:Marah.B.DANIELSON@odot.state.or.us] Sent:Thursday, October 05, 2017 4:09 PM To:Susan Shanks Cc: RAHMAN Lidwien;JENSVOLD Martin R;TAYAR Abraham *Avi; BROOKING Joshua C Subject: RE: Proposed Map&Code Amendments--Tigard Triangle Hi Susan, I am coordinating ODOT's response to the Tigard Triangle proposed map and code amendments and will be working with Lidwien and Avi on our review. Do you know when you anticipate having the TRP analysis?What is the deadline for getting comments in before the staff report is prepared? 2 Thanks, Marah Danielson, Senior Planner ODOT R1 Development Review Program (503)731-8258 marah.b.danielson@odot.state.or.us From: BROOKING Joshua C Sent:Tuesday, October 03, 2017 2:00 PM To: DANIELSON Marah B Cc: RAHMAN Lidwien;JENSVOLD Martin R;TAYAR Abraham * Avi Subject: FW: Proposed Map&Code Amendments--Tigard Triangle See attached and below. From:Susan Shanks [mailto:SusanS@tigard-or.gov] Sent: Monday, October 02, 2017 6:00 PM To: Region 1 DEVREV Applications Cc: RAHMAN Lidwien Subject: Proposed Map&Code Amendments--Tigard Triangle Greetings ODOT staff, In August 2017,the Tigard City Council approved a set of code amendments called the Tigard Triangle Lean Code.This code will not go into effect until such time as the related zoning map amendments for the Tigard Triangle are approved. Please see attached for the proposed zoning map and TSP amendments for the Triangle.The first public hearing on the proposal is November 6, 2017 before the Tigard Planning Commission.As you may be aware,the city is in the process of conducting a TPR Trip Generation Analysis in response to the proposed amendments, and we are actively working with Lidwien Rahman at ODOT on completing this analysis to ODOT's satisfaction. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. Regards, Susan P Shanks I Senior Planner Community Development Department I City of Tigard Email susans@tigard-or.gov Phone 503-718-2454 Fax 503-718-2748 DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules "City General Records Retention Schedule." 3 Susan Shanks From: Susan Shanks Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2017 8:57 AM To: Susan Shanks Subject: RE: Comparison of CG &TMU Standards From: Susan Shanks Sent: Monday, November 06, 2017 1:20 PM To: jcorliss@landmarkford.com Cc: Tom McGuire Subject: RE: Comparison of CG&TMU Standards Tom McGuire and I just spoke,and he indicated that in his professional judgment it would take a major redevelopment of your site to trigger the extension of Elmhurst. Mr. McGuire is the city's Assistant Community Development Director. Though we can't say it would never happen, it would take a lot for it to be triggered. From: Susan Shanks Sent: Monday, November 06, 2017 12:16 PM To: 'Jim Corliss' Subject: RE: Comparison of CG &TMU Standards It all depends on what you were proposing to build and whether the traffic impacts of what you were proposing triggered any traffic mitigation. I can imagine a number of scenarios where a new building(or an expansion)would not trigger a street extension. The city may ask you to consider not building it over a possible future street alignment, but we wouldn't be able to require you to build it elsewhere. I can also imagine other scenarios that would trigger the street extension. I'm sorry I can't provide you with a more definitive yes or no answer. It's difficult with hypothetical future scenarios when the answer depends on the type and size of building and the ensuing traffic analysis. From: Jim Corliss [mailto:jcorliss©landmarkford.comj Sent: Monday, November 06, 2017 12:02 PM To: Susan Shanks Subject: Re: Comparison of CG &TMU Standards Thanks, all of our signs were erected well after 1979. My question on Elmhurst is what if I want to build a structure where the map shows a future street? We have discussed several needs, one is a possible separate showroom required by Lincoln, another is car wash and added quick service bays. Can't have a road go through the middle of these From: Susan Shanks Sent: Monday, November 06, 2017 11:48 AM To: 'Jim Corliss' Subject: RE: Comparison of CG &TMU Standards Hi Jim—See my responses below in red. Cheers, Susan 1 From: Jim Corliss [mailto:icorlissPlandmarkford.com] Sent: Monday, November 06, 2017 9:35 AM To: Susan Shanks Subject: Re: Comparison of CG &TMU Standards OK. Also I have a couple of other questions: How does the new sign code affect us? See attached for a summary of the sign code changes being proposed. We have 2 free standing freeway signs that I believe exceed the standards, are these grand fathered?Yes, but it also depends. No changes are being proposed to the nonconforming sign section of the current code. However, the current code requires some nonconforming signs to come into conformance after 10 years or be removed. This 10-year conformance or removal provision applies to signs erected before 1971 and before 1978. Signs made nonconforming after those years are allowed to remain as nonconforming signs into perpetuity but with a few limitations, i.e. you can change the sign copy but you can't structurally change the sign or sign structure beyond normal maintenance and repair. I don't know the history of your signs, so I don't know whether they fall into the 10-year category or not. Does the proposed street (Elmhurst) extension from 68th to 66th through our property prevent expansion over that foot print? I object to that extension as not needed and especially if it restricts our expansion needs in the future. Not at this time, but future development on the site may require the extension of Elmhurst based on traffic impacts from the proposed development. Legally, any future extension of Elmhurst must be related to the traffic impacts of the proposed development, as determined by a traffic engineer, at the time development is proposed. For example, if you were to build a new showroom to show cars that you already had for sale on your lot, the impacts of the new building (number of new vehicle trips generated) would probably not trigger the extension of Elmhurst. If, on the other hand, your proposed development was for a new multi-floor showroom that increased the number of vehicles for sale on your lot and had office space for new employees to manage those sales, then the city engineer may determine that offsite improvements are required to mitigate the traffic impacts of new trips generated by the development.The extension of Elmhurst is one possible mitigation action that could be requested. It all depends on what you propose to build and whether it would generate more new vehicle trips to your business or not. Jim From: Susan Shanks Sent: Monday, November 06, 2017 7:47 AM To: 'Jim Corliss' Subject: RE: Comparison of CG &TMU Standards Hi Jim, Glad to hear it. We've drafted the language (see below). Please let me know if you have any questions. 18.660.050 Pre-Existing Development and Approvals C. Sites with Pre-Existing Land Uses. 1.A pre-existing land use that does not meet the land use standards in Section 18.660.060 may continue but shall not expand beyond the boundaries of the site that it occupied prior to the effective date of this chapter, except 2 for any pre-existing land uses within the area bounded by 66th Avenue and 68th Avenue to the east and west and Dartmouth Street and Franklin Street to the north and south,respectively. Any pre-existing land uses within this area that do not meet the land use standards in Section 18.660.060 may continue and expand beyond the boundaries of the site that it occupied prior to the effective date of this chapter,but not beyond the boundaries of the area described above. Susan P Shanks I Senior Planner Community Development Department I City of Tigard Email susans@tigard-or.gov Phone 503-718-2454 Fax 503-718-2748 From: Jim Corliss [mailto:jcorliss@landmarkford.com] Sent: Friday, November 03, 2017 11:37 AM To: Susan Shanks Subject: Re: Comparison of CG &TMU Standards OK, I can work with that. Jim From: Susan Shanks Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2017 2:46 PM To: 'Jim Corliss' Cc: Tom McGuire Subject: RE: Comparison of CG &TMU Standards Hi Jim, Here's my second follow-up of the day from my meeting with the City Attorney and Assistant Community Development Director.We discussed your proposal for a possible future expansion of your dealership to the one lot in your block that you don't own.The City Attorney was able to confirm that there was a way to do this in the code,and we all agreed that allowing such an expansion was preferable to having your property remain zoned General Commercial.As a result,we're willing to draft language that would allow you expand your dealership to that lot(assuming you purchase it in the future) if that meant you would support the rezone of your property to Triangle Mixed-Use (TMU). Please let me know if that would be acceptable to you, and we'll work on drafting the specific language to propose to the Planning Commission at the public hearing this coming Monday, Nov 6. Thanks, Susan P Shanks I Senior Planner Community Development Department I City of Tigard Email susans@tigard-or.gov Phone 503-718-2454 Fax 503-718-2748 From: Jim Corliss [mailto:jcorliss©alandmarkford.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2017 2:32 PM 3 To: Susan Shanks Subject: Re: Comparison of CG &TMU Standards Thanks for the follow through. From: Susan Shanks Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2017 9:33 AM To: icorliss(@landmarkford.com Cc: Tom McGuire Subject: Comparison of CG &TMU Standards Hi Jim, As a follow up to our meeting from last week, please see below for a comparison between the existing CG standards and the new TMU standards as they relate to a future new building or building addition on your property. General Commercial (CG)Zone Requirements • A new building or building addition would require a Type II Site Development Review(SDR) land use application • A new building or building addition may or may not trigger changes to your on-site parking and landscaping • "Variances"to development standards are difficult to obtain • A new building would need to be built along 68th Ave and meet setback standards, i.e. be built within 10' of your street property line • A building addition would need to come closer into conformance with setback standards, e.g. if the existing building is 20'from your street property line,the addition would need to be closer than 20'from your street property line Triangle Mixed-Use(TMU) Requirements • A new building or building addition would not require a Type II Site Development Review (SDR) land use application • A new building or addition would likely not trigger changes to your on-site parking • "Adjustments"to development standards are easier to obtain than variances • A new building could be built anywhere on the site as long as it was 35' or more from all street property lines and partially or completely behind an existing building, but one that didn't meet these standards would need to be built within 12'of a street property line • A building addition that was 35' or more from all street property lines would be okay, but one that was closer than 35'would need to be built within 12'of a street property line I'm meeting with the City Attorney and the Assistant Community Development Director today to discuss the feasibility of your proposal (under TMU zoning)to allow for the possibility of a future expansion of your business to the one lot in your block that you aspire to purchase in the future. I will let you know the results of that meeting tomorrow. Please let me know if you have any other questions at this time. Cheers, Susan P Shanks I Senior Planner Community Development Department I City of Tigard Email susans@tigard-or.gov Phone 503-718-2454 Fax 503-718-2748 4 Q r• 600 NE Grand Ave. .10% �� M e 1 O Portland,OR 97232-2736 oregonmetro.gov November 1,2017 Susan Shanks Senior Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard,OR 97223 Dear Ms.Shanks: Thank you for sharing your staff report regarding the possible adoption of Lean Code amendments for the Tigard Triangle.The majority of the changes you are proposing have an implication for Title 6 of the Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan.Title 6 is a non-mandatory section of the UGMFP,but is required to be adhered to for the reception of specific Regional Investment dollars or implementation of specific transportation incentives.We have reviewed your submittal and have the following comments regarding your findings on Title 6,specifically regarding Section 3.07.630 Eligibility Actions for Lower Mobility Standards and Trip Generation Rates: • 3.07.630(b) (1)-Metro does acknowledge the Tigard Triangle as a Town Center on the official 2040 Growth Concept Map.We were not aware that a procedural error had occurred at the City with that official adoption.However,official adoption of the boundary within six months of these code changes is acceptable to rectify this issue. • 3.07.630(b) (2)-Metro concurs that the adoption of the Lean Code and subsequent proposed zone change will allow for an appropriate mix and intensity of uses for town centers. • 3.07.630(b) (3) -Metro concurs that the adoption of the Lean Code and additional Transportation System Plan policies in existence meet the intent of subsections A and B. However,the Parking Management Plan requirement has always proved difficult to address. The possibility of investment of Light Rail in the Triangle,and the timing of that investment has always added a layer of complexity to this issue.The City has historically taken the approach of planning for the Triangle without assuming Light Rail as a foregone conclusion. However,as we get closer to the likelihood of Light Rail in the area,and the City seeks to implement its Lean Code on future development,a Parking Management Plan becomes more important to have in place.Metro is agreeable to establishing a timeline for the completion of a Parking Management Strategy for the Tigard Triangle,but would like to see strong language in the adoption ordinance directing staff to begin that work within six months of the proposed zoning code changes and to have the plan completed within 18 months of that start date.Within six months,a Locally Preferred Alternative for Southwest Corridor Light Rail should be decided,allowing the City to move forward with more certainty regarding how Light Rail will impact the street network and parcels within the Triangle.This seems like the perfect time to begin addressing parking needs and solutions within this important redevelopment area. City of Tigard November 1, 2017 Page 2 Metro continues to share the commitment the City has to this area and is supportive of the vision outlined in the Tigard Triangle Strategic Plan of establishing a pedestrian-oriented,mixed-use district built around the Triangle's distinguishing natural features,with the area evolving into an active,multimodal district connected to the City and the region that attracts new residents and businesses. The Tigard City Council,City staff,property owners,and the citizens of Tigard have clearly put a substantial amount of effort into this area over the last decade.Metro is looking forward to working with the City of Tigard as your implementation work progresses.Please do not hesitate to contact us for assistance as this process continues to move forward. Sincerely, _ 4 r Brian Harp& Senior Regional Planner Investment Areas c: Councilor Craig Dirksen,Metro District No.3 Elissa Gertler,Planning&Development Director Malu Wilkinson,Investment Areas Manager Chris Ford,SW Corridor Project Manager Susan Shanks From: Steve DeAngelo <steve@cateringbydeangelos.com> Sent: Monday, November 06, 2017 5:26 PM To: Susan Shanks Cc: Sean Farrelly; 'Debi Mollahan';#Councilmail Subject: Sign Code Revisions for MU-CBD Susan, The review of the proposed sign codes for Downtown appear to support walkability as well as a pedestrian friendly environment which are certainly part of the TDA visions for an enhanced downtown. Although we have not had the opportunity to discuss the proposed revisions with all of our stakeholder groups,those we have spoken with have not shown any oppositions that we can note. I do like the proposed language below regarding A Frames as an alternative to the first draft: A-frame signs: The maximum number of A-frame signs allowed shall be equal to the number of ground floor tenant spaces in the building or the equivalent of one sign for every 30 feet of building facade,whichever is greater. My only other concern is how the city will allow/address non-conforming sign use in the future-I recall there being a discussion that somewhere in the code limited non-conforming use to conform with in 10 years which I am NOT in favor of. Non-conforming for me means grandfathered in until change of use is applied- Hopefully you can work through this piece to allow these property& business owners the burden of dramatic changes or costs. Thank you, Steve DeAngelo, President DeAngelo's Catering& Events 9037 S.W. Burnham Street Tigard,Oregon 97223 503-620-9020 Office 503-620-3964 Fax CATERING AND EVE Ws De A E LO'S www.cateringbydeangelos.com k,..., 1 PCR I 1 V s co i e 1120 NW Couch Street 0 +1.503.727.2000 10th Floor 0 +1.503.727.2222 Portland,OR 97209-4128 PerkinsCoie.com November 6, 2017 Dana L.Krawczuk DKrawczuk@perkinscoie.com D. +1.503.727.2036 F. +1.503.346.2036 VIA EMAIL Planning Commission City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Base Camp I,LLC's Lean Code Testimony Dear President Fitzgerald and Members of the Planning Commission: Base Camp I, LLC ("Base Camp") strongly supports the City's efforts to streamline the code applicable to development in the Triangle. Clarifying the code is critically important if the City desires to stimulate development, as demonstrated by Base Camp's efforts to develop in the Triangle. As you may recall, in November 2016 this Commission approved Base Camp's cancer treatment center(the "Project"), located at the corner of SW Dartmouth Street and SW 72nd Avenue(tax lot 300). For the past year the Project has been on appeal, and the issue on appeal relates to ambiguity in the current code about the interaction of street standards in the Tigard Triangle provisions and general code standards. Base Camp owns the two tax lots highlighted on the attached Exhibit 1, and would like to develop that property in the future (the "Future Development Site"). Our review of the Lean Code was through the lens of how the code would apply to the Future Development Site,with an emphasis on road spacing and connectivity standards,which has been an issue in the appeal of the oncology center Project. Transportation network connectivity in the Tigard Triangle must conform to Map 18.620.B (Tigard Triangle Transportation Network), which is attached. CDC 18.620.090.C.3.a. Base Camp supports Map 18.620.B Tigard Triangle Transportation Network. As relevant to the Future Development Site, two important conclusions related to street connectivity can be drawn from Map 18.620.B: 1. A future path is the required transportation improvement in the vicinity of the oncology center Project and Future Development Site. This designation is appropriate because the approval for the Project requires a bicycle and pedestrian connection in that location. 137579099.1 Ferns Cae LIP Planning Commission City of Tigard November 6, 2017 Page 2 2. No street extension/vehicular connectivity west of SW 72nd Avenue in the vicinity of the Project and Future Development Site is required. We support Map 18.620.B and look forward to the oncology center Project and Future Development Site being among the first projects to contribute urban renewal funds in the Tigard Triangle. Very truly yours, Dana L. Krawczuk DLK:dlk 137579099.1 Penins Cote LLP Planning Commission City of Tigard November 6, 2017 Page 3 Exhibit 1 —Base Camp Property fir` , _ iiii r iii ....---- iI\ <11 1111.ar Select taxlat on --a+[ \ ____ I ii" mapMI Nr --'7----- r - . NI ., w._ - ./1 ova n' ,' I i ---7----\\ \''\ LILTF—rr ) Mil ,1„----q \ \-------------r----; jzi -nr-r-T__ A \ p_ _: // ,,—_„ \ i______,, „_ ,_.7_, , „, , , . , , ___,i____, , --T—T_s_ii FE -Tr? II , .----L___L__J___LL / III __-_-: _ . , i it______/, \ •c-- _ 1_� �-_� , .............. t, 1 ,. . • , f, , ,,, . =Future Development Site =Oncology Center Site [Map 18.620.B Tigard Triangle Transportation Network is on the following page] 137579099.1 Perkins Coe LLP Planning Commission City of Tigard November 6, 2017 Page 4 - -..,--ce- i�� 7 ' -1 __i Tigard Triangle -, I ] IL -Itl;1H I 1 iii P 3 Transportation Network Map 1 : -� m �� . 1-• Him .� III � --_ __ -fig 1 gra OM ausi org g� ,,,.=, t -- ji,g , ,„ ,__,,,___......_. � is MIN Mill. MIMI -16.5 I itI :f ' A o MI M. W m MIN MI i Mom ge 11111.. Ms 11111111mo I III , 444 Mil I ''l \Ill_ , ' 1111 '''' \' 16cNlin m.* alp ail iLC t� ',mil116• Q ■ , ■ I, ,r,/ : mr- .1., pow iinitriii, p . . .. , .____;_.., _ , - -L. /f 'J ;c _ __ R1IF 1 L'I ..., :11 ..„,,„ mu ol • 1 sm �� — •4,0******* ' DAR,. 1 I VI sr_ ■■rl \\\\\ I 1. RN 1 priskW ttt ***;••.., --.11_1111. _OH_ _ IN" - 1 j 1 sir , ,, _____________ i ri i 1 i Ili _ _._ _ ;,,,. , . I ' ',,, Ip...4,14, • - , i , ., li iii r til � '�R R ..+• ice, • i Transportation Facilities 11•1111 i la amoloop Existing Street F FI i. s'■ Future Street I r Future Path 1� ExistingTrail 1 ( ( 1 ra—T\ Future Trail a,il --` Bike Lane (Both Sides) ( 1 _ I I ----- Bike Lane (East Side) .., .; Required Intersection (Location Illustrative) rIner•(♦ 1111 . Alleys(Encouraged) �� ro Tigard Triangle Plan District I NM It, Attachment 6 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 17- AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING A PACKAGE OF AMENDMENTS SPECIFIC TO THE TIGARD TRIANGLE AND DOWNTOWN TIGARD, INCLUDING AMENDMENTS TO THE TIGARD TRIANGLE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING MAP DESIGNATIONS,THE TIGARD TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN,AND THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 18 CHAPTER 18.660 (TIGARD TRIANGLE PLAN DISTRICT), CHAPTER 18.650 (TIGARD DOWNTOWN PLAN DISTRICT), AND CHAPTER 18.435 (SIGNS) TO IMPLEMENT THE DEVELOPMENT VISION FOR THE TIGARD TRIANGLE AND DOWNTOWN TIGARD, A REGIONAL TOWN CENTER, AS DESCRIBED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND IN FURTHERANCE OF TIGARD'S WALKABILITY GOALS. (Land Use Files: CPA2017-00002,ZON2017-00002,and DCA2017-00004)DECLARING AN EMERGENCY WHEREAS the Tigard Comprehensive Plan states that a significant portion of future employment growth and high-density housing shall occur in the Tigard Triangle and Downtown Tigard;and WHERAS the 2015 Tigard Triangle Strategic Plan and the 2005 Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan envision these areas as active, urban, multimodal, and mixed-use districts consistent with their designation as a regional town center; and WHEREAS the Tigard City Council adopted a comprehensive set of development code amendments, known as the Tigard Triangle Lean Code, in August 2017 (Ordinance 17-19) consistent with the development vision in the Tigard Triangle Strategic Plan;and WHEREAS the Tigard Triangle Lean Code did not include a comprehensive plan or zoning map amendment,and the effective date of these code amendments was made contingent upon the adoption of new comprehensive plan and zoning designations for the Tigard Triangle; and WHEREAS the City of Tigard conducted the required Oregon Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) analysis to support new comprehensive plan and zoning designations for the Tigard Triangle consistent with the Tigard Triangle Strategic Plan;and WHEREAS the TPR analysis,in turn, required amendments to the Tigard Transportation System Plan and a commitment by the city to amend its town center boundary and develop a Tigard Triangle parking management plan.The first action is required to rezone the Tigard Triangle.The second and third actions are required to be in compliance with Metro Code Section 3.07.630 within Title 6 of the Urban Growth Management Function Plan;and ORDINANCE NO. 17- Page 1 WHEREAS the City of Tigard prepared development code amendments for Chapter 18.660 (Tigard Triangle Plan District), Chapter 18.650 (Tigard Downtown Plan District), and Chapter 18.435 (Signs) consistent with the Tigard Triangle Strategic Plan and Downtown Improvement Plan and in furtherance of the city's walkability goals; and WHEREAS this package of amendments includes changes to the Comprehensive Plan Map, Zoning Map,Transportation System Plan,and Community Development Code,and is collectively known as the Tigard Triangle Lean Code Phase II amendments; and WHEREAS on November 6, 2017, the Tigard Planning Commission held a public hearing,which was noticed in accordance with city standards,and recommended approval of the Tigard Triangle Lean Code Phase II amendments with a vote in unanimous support;and WHEREAS, on December 12, 2017, the Tigard City Council held a public hearing, which was noticed in accordance with city standards, to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation,hear public testimony,and to consider appropriate findings and conclusions in support of the adoption of the Tigard Triangle Lean Code Phase II amendments. NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The amendments to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map that are attached as Exhibit A are hereby adopted. SECTION 2: The underline and strikeout amendments to the Tigard Transportation System Plan, an ancillary Comprehensive Plan document, that are attached as Exhibit B.1 are hereby adopted. Exhibit B.2 is a clean version of the amendments and is provided for reference only. SECTION 3: The underline and strikeout amendments to Tigard Municipal Code Title 18 Chapters 18.660, 18.650, and 18.435 that are attached as Exhibit C.1 are hereby adopted. Exhibit C.2 is a clean version of the amendments and is provided for reference only. SECTION 4: The findings and conclusions that are attached as Exhibit D are hereby adopted as the basis in support of this Ordinance. SECTION 5: This Ordinance being necessary to allow development applications to be filed and review to commence within the constraints of the construction season and development cycle, an emergency is declared and this Ordinance shall take effect on December 14, 2017. SECTION 6: The City of Tigard commits to adopt an amended town center boundary to include the Tigard Triangle within six months of this Ordinance taking effect, in compliance with Metro Code Section 3.07.620(b). ORDINANCE NO. 17- Page 2 SECTION 7: The City of Tigard commits to develop and adopt a parking management plan for the Tigard Triangle within 2 years of this Ordinance taking effect, in compliance with Metro Code Section 3.08.410. PASSED: By vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this day of ,2017. Carol Krager, City Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this day of ,2017. John Cook, Mayor Approved as to form: City Attorney ORDINANCE NO. 17- Page 3 Exhibit A _PINEST_ ' i 1 1L1._ �>i 11" -- „m _ Tigard Triangle j •�� . < \ N ST Comprehensive Plan and IS'RUCE STI_1 �_,SPRUCE STL ^� V- 0.- - Zoning Designations �� '°� w — General Commercial (C-G)Zone L "+— _ 1 Triangle Mixed-Use(TMU)Zone , =� G /, Tigard Triangle j Q a I l � PFAFFLE ST ' /� .._ _.. MX PFAFFLE ST. \/ i J Z / '� PALL J i -� ATLANTA ST(f HANES ST ATLANTA ST:.�.1 1 ��1 1 t i —/ t..,I � I 1 I J� { BAYLOR ST �� BAYLOR ST:' ] 1 I i '� i IITI`` .1--. U._1- - ___i 1 t 7 1 , - -` 4 i 1 t r ` _�SCLINTON ST "1 � ,-- �gRTMGUTH ST r' v, \\\ DOUGLPSi �� —GARDEN PL_.. x C" eu�n„gsi s i / i__— r c KNO< -1',A'- ,... HERM a OSO WAY i _.. �.,f FRANKLIN ST v -1 144111, 6EVELAND RD 6E VELAND RD a SOUTH WOOD DRit ,. : 44110,,, r, IT Z�FgR /J ,' a a O I �Z� j /�0., ^ \ HAMPTON ST HAMPTON ST !- --M^ � w<- PAEL ` ,0. CRESI I W ST � 9{ VARNSI � I �T`VARNSIST llIl w rc r_ce k w U I FIR FIR ST 0_ I1 CS e _ IN H , —i SAND43 f q IN G �Ti 1 I I 1 I: 'ECH CENTER DR NNE/ Development of the 2035 TSP Exhibit B.1 A notable finding from this step was that there were projects from previous planning efforts that no longer meet the community goals.As such,the following projects were removed from the TSP: Nimbus Avenue Extension due to environmental impacts to Fanno Creek and related cost effectiveness. Wall Street Extension due to cost effectiveness and potential environmental justice impacts. New interchange on Highway 217 at the extension of SW 68th Avenue due to inconsistency with the RTP and ODOT plans. Step 4:Review of Bridge Projects Due to their high costs,the projects requiring bridge structures to cross highways and railroad tracks were considered to determine if all were necessary,identify which projects were most desired within the planning horizon as well as those that should be include for the purpose of long-term right-of- way protection.This review identified existing plans for a total of seven grade-separated crossings. The individual project evaluations in Step 3 were supplemented with the overall review of the number of costly grade-separated crossing proposed.On that basis,the following crossings have been removed from the TSP or modified: Northern Washington Square Regional Center crossing(Highway 217 crossing)was modified to a pedestrian and bicycle connection only. Wall Street extension(railroad crossing)was removed due to cost effectiveness and potential environmental justice impacts as described as part of Step 3. '0 Dartmouth Street/Hunziker connection(over Highway 217)was removed due to cost and redundancy with the Hunziker Street/Hampton Street Connection. Durham Road extension under I-5 was not included due to limited system benefits and cost effectiveness. The following crossings were recommended to remain in the 2035 TSP: 0 Northern Washington Square Regional Center crossing(as pedestrian/bike connection only) Southern Washington Square Regional Center crossing i Hunziker Street/Hampton BevelandRoad(formerlyHamptonStreet)connection over Highway 217 Step 5 Step 5 of the alternatives analysis included evaluation of potential new roadway projects that would benefit overall multi-modal system operations.Two of the notable new projects in the 2035 TSP include the North Dakota-Pfaffle Neighborhood Route and North Dakota realignment.These projects are envisioned to occur in tandem with or subsequent to realignment of Tiedeman to the west away from the North Dakota-Greenburg Road intersection. The North Dakota-Pfaffle neighborhood route and North Dakota realignmentwould provide a much needed east-west connection between Pfaffle and North Dakota Street over Highway 217 and would provide an alternative to Pacific Highway and Walnut Street for travel between east and west 4.16 City of Tigard i 2035 TSP Transportation System Plan Special Areas The following section identifies the three areas within the city—Tigard Triangle,Washington Square Regional Center and Downtown Tigard—with growth opportunities but also significant transportation challenges.Each of the three areas are described below,including a summary of current transportation challenges,followed by strategies for infrastructure investments which are depicted in Figures 5-12 through 5-15. In addition to improvement projects,this 2035 TSP identifies non-SOV mode split targets for the Tigard Triangle that are higher than required by the Metro RTP(see Table 5-3).Achieving these targets will require integrated land use and parking management strategies. Land Use Planning Each of these areas is designated for significant housing and employment growth.The land in the Tigard Triangle is zoned for commercial development(west of 72nd Avenue)and mixed USO development(east of 72nd Avenue). Development of commercial and residential uses in close proximity to each other promotes walking trips for commute trips and non-commute travel. These opportunities can be captured by incorporating densities, mixed-uses, design standards and other land use strategies in the overall planning efforts for the areas. An initial look at land use alternatives will occur with the initial phases of HCT planning. Development patterns that support H CT—such as mixed uses,higher densities,pedestrian orientation—will encourage the public investments necessary to implement HCT.As future transportation and land uses studies for HCT move forward,they will help to identify complementary land use and transportation investments to support HCT and other transit service to Tigard. F. Parking Management Parking management will be a critical component of creating travel options to and from each sub area.Adequate parking is essential to economic vitality;at the same time too much parking can degrade the pedestrian environment and cause excessive physical space dedicated to parking.A review of parking requirements and parking management measures is warranted in conjunction with land use planning for these areas.In particular,as more emphasis and investment is directed toward walk,bike and transit trips,the amount of parking and the way that it is used will be modified to support the priority purposes of eachsarea. Tigard Triangle The Tigard Triangle is a priority opportunity for community development and economic activity.The triangle Triangle has long been a retail and commercial hub within the city.Today,the triangle Triangle is zoned for commercial and mixed-use development and is identified as an area of significant future growth in housing and jobs. Although the area is bordered by three major regional roadways,in many ways those these roadways function as barriers to access the triangle Triangle.Travel to and from the Tigan Triangle is funneled 2035 TSP City of Tigard 5.73 Transportation System Plan from Pacific Highway via 72nd Avenue,Dartmouth Street and 68th Parkway;the Highway 217/72nd Avenue interchange;the northbound I-5 interchange with Haines Street;and the southbound I-5 interchange with Dartmouth Street. Access to and from the Tigard Triangle area is,and will remain,a critical issue to the success of the Tigard Triangle area.The majority of employees and customers traveling to the area on city streets access the Tigard Triangle area off of Pacific Highway.There is considerable congestion on Pacific Highway in the vicinity of the Tigard Triangle and this congestion is forecast to worsen with future development and regional growth. A second issue with the Tigard Triangle relates to non-auto mobility/circulation to/from to,from, and within the area.The triangle Triangle area as a whole is generally sloping downward from Pacific Highway and I- 5 to Highway 217.The topography makes pedestrian and bicycle transportation more difficult.These conditions are worsened by incomplete bicycle and pedestrian systems within the Triangle. At the broadest level,options for improving access to the Tigard Triangle area fall into the following categories: Provide additional intersection and roadway capacity improvements to improve traffic operations at the boundary streets. Provide additional roadway capacity as development occurs to support a pedestrian-oriented development pattern. Maximize existing infrastructure investments by focusing on parking management and travel demand management programs. Provide a more integrated system of transportation options for pedestrians,cyclists,and transit users. Minimize additional roadway capacity infrastructure investmentand focus on travel demand management (TDM) programs. Provide better facilities for alternative modes(transit,bicycles,pedestrians,etc.). Create a mix of critical additional capacity and implementing TDM programs. Figure 5-12 shows the existing and planned transportation facilities in the Tigard Triangle that improve access to, from, and within the area. New streets,trails, and paths are designed to complete the original street grid pattern and provide additional circulation options for all modes of travel. New bridges to the east and west are intended to overcome the barriers created by Highway 217 and Interstate 5 and create a better connection with Downtown Tigard. In addition to providing bicycle and pedestrian facilities along the entire length of 72nd Avenue, a 72nd Avenue corridor study is needed to determine segment-specific cross sections that address the competing multimodal transportation needs along this corridor. Figure 5 12 shows the planned roadway improvement projects related to access to the Tigard to existing roadways,extension of Atlanta Street to connect 68th Avenue and Dartmouth,and a new Highway 217 overcrossing connecting Hunziker Streetto Hampton Street.The Atlanta Street extension and Hunziker Street overcrossing would provide needed additional Triangle area from the south and west. 5.-4 2035 TSP City of Tigard The plan also includes widening 72nd Avenue(arterial)and Dartmouth Street(collector)to five lanes. Without careful design of both facilities,these could end up functioning as a surrogate Triangle.An initial step toward realizing these projects is a corridor study(see Table 5 4)to review street cross sections and potential parallel routes.Specific project considerations for the Tigard Triangle can be found in Technical Memorandum#5 in the Volume 3 Technical Appendix. ABLE 5-6: MULTI-MODAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENT LIST ProjectName Project Type Description' Special Jurisdiction Time Financially Cost IDArea Frame Constrained Estimate Add signal and northbound right turn lane on 65th Ave at Haines St to 65th Avenue/Haines Intersection Tigard • 3 Street Improvement maintain or improve mobility, Triangle Portland Near-term $1.000,000 queuing,and safety for TPR compliance Complete interchange reconstruction with additional BRHighway217/72nd Ave lanes to maintain or improve Interchange mobility,queuing,and safety for Tigard $19,500,000 4 Interchange Improvement TPR5 compliance,such as the Triangle ODOT Near-term Yes $30.000.000 Improvements addition of a second northbound right turn lane ramps and ovcrcrossings Wall Street/Tech Center Complete Wall St from Hunziker Rd 15 Ne Drive Extension' New Road to terminus and extend to Tech Tigard Near-term j& $6.000.000 Center Dr along railway Extend Atlanta Street west from 69th Ave to future Tigard 19 Atlanta Street extension New Road *^ ^^~'~^ �" Triangle Tigard Mid-term Yes $3440404 74th Ave Sheet $6.000,000 I Connect Hunziker Road to 72nd Highway 217 over Avenue requires over crossing ODOT/ -24 ^.Hunziker i New Road M44-ter-m• Yes $10,000,000 over Highway 217 removes Tigard Marripterreeririeetieli Street intersection Highway 217 overcrossing New Construct new Highway 217 Tieard / 23 g Triangle/ ODOT at Beveland Bridge overcrossin to connect Beveland Rd g / Tigard Mid term Yt $30.000,000 to Hunziker Rd Downtown Extend 74th Ave south from Pacific Tieard 6 28 74th Avenue extension New Road Highway to Hermoso Wy or Beveland Tigard Mid-term Yes $5,000,000 , Rd Triangle 1 ABLE,S-6: MULTI-MODAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENT LISTS Project Name Project Type Descriptions Special Jurisdiction Time Financially Cost ID Area Frame Constrained Estimate Widen to 2/3 lanes between 38 e� � _ Tigard Tigard ""':. _gin No $10,000,000 eggs . h end Triangle 72nd Avenue widening: Road Tigard ! 31 ORE 99WPacific Widening Widen to 4/5 lanes Triangle Tigard Mid-term Yes $8,000,000 Highway to Dartmouth n rt. ..th c« « Complete 1/5 lane section from ea 3� d Costco to 72nd Avenue(small Tigard widen-tog 3Azieleffing ... Triangle Tigard *gin Ne $3.20,000 direction only). n Widen to 4 lanes plus turn lanes and sidewalks between 72nd Ave and 1-5 (68th Ave)to maintain or improve mobility.queuing,and 38 Dartmouth Street widening Road safety for TPR5 compliance,such as Tigard Tigard Near-term Yes $3,000,000 Widening the addition of a second westbound Triangle through lane and dedicated westbound left turn lane at 68th 1 Ave 68th Avenue/Atlanta Street Intersection Add traffic Traffic signal and Tigard 50 / Improvement turn lanes where necessary Triangle Tigard Near-term Yes No $500,000 Haines 68th ny nue/DartmouthI ion Tigard 91�f 5} Near teer-m Ne $509-989 Street pmt turn lanes where necessary mangle 72nd A.. au /Dartmouth Traffic signal and 53 Intersection Tigard Near-tem Yes 00 Street � intersection widening Triangle —I Intersection improvements to maintain or improve mobility and safety for TPRS compliance,such as the removal of the northbound left 66d Pacific Highway/I-5 Intersection turn lane/signal at 64th Ave such as Tigard ODOT/ Near-term Yes $5,000,809 Southbound fSB)Ramp Improvement Triangle Portland $100.000 I 5 ramps to reduce confusion, congestion and related accidents TABLE 5-6. MULTI-MODAL PRO ECT IMPROVEMENT LISP a Project Name Project Type Description34 Special Jurisdiction Time Financially Cost ID Area Frame Constrained Estimate Mixed-ttstMulti-use Path Projects Construct new hard surface trail along Red Rock Creek parallel to Tigard 6 M10 Red Rock Creek Trail New Trail end south of Pacific Highway Triangle Tigard Long-"Term Yes $3,000,000 1 Construct new pedestrian bridge ODOT, Beveland Pedestrian over Interstate 5 between Tigard Tigard, 6 Mil Bridge New Bridge $eveland Rd in Tigard to Triangle Clackamas Long-Term Yes $6.000.000 Southwood Dr in Clackamas County County Transportation System Management Arterial Provide arterial corridor mgt.Arterial Ger-44ff-Management TSM4 72nd Avenue Corridor along Corridor Tigard Tigard Mid-term No $1,700,000 Management #19(14ighwayjlwy 217)in the Metro ,Triangle TSMO Plan 'These projects were modified in 2017 to be consistent with various Tigard Triangle planning documents: 3,4, 19,23,28,29,31,37,38,50,51,52,66d,M10,M11. and TSM4.Projects 3,28,M10,and MI 1 were added.Projects 29,37,51,and 52 were deleted because they were completed or no longer needed.The descriptions and cost estimates for Projects 4, 19,23,38,and 66d were revised. All other edits were minor. 4A11 road projects include bicycle and pedestrian facilities,consistent with the adopted street design standards for the street classification. 5 TPR generally refers to the Oregon Transportation Planning Rule(OAR 600-012-0060)and specifically to the TPR compliance report that was completed in November 2017 for the Tigard Triangle rezone.This report identified the need for TPR mitigation projects and led to the addition of Project 3 and the modification of Projects 4,38,and 66d. 6 These projects are proposed to be included in the 2018 RTP financially constrained project list. 'This project was added in 2017 to be consistent with the city's economic development initiatives for the Hunziker Industrial Core Area. The project timelines identified in Table 55-66 are depicted in Figure 5-9, Figure 5-10 and Figure 5-11. The first figure shows only near- term projects; Figure 5-10 shows the combined Near-term and Mid-term projects. Figure 5-11 shows all of the planned projects. Ad";‘, "� MI Figure 5-2 TIOVEN l� 1 N Roadway i l I Functional ,�r � � 1 Classification Tigard Urban ii E io i7� -� Planning Area ig A 0111 • 01. ��-�■■ Freeway s �� • • Z ? r t.rl� • •Principal Arterial . -Arterial i -Collector 1114.11 =,� n�!Mil Neighborhood iI'� • —Local .rl�rllii� „,44 Area(STA) �1 g � ` • '-�---Special Transportation in ll i ,�� 11 ••••Future Roadways � � �� 111 Other Map Elements 40)44Z.ii i lit-sr'.i op sok • OTransitCenter9da,A '�• - • �� - r �' •m••rTigardCityBoundary-�' ., (f ;.ry �: ' , �' See Figure 5-12r Other RailLincs %�C_ IIII T �e-_ �. ,� ''' for complete r a.r•.rr.r.� - ' i Tigard Triangle "'fir Transporation ��l � ` 'F: �, ' •p� , Network 'VW? r, I dcmgrallIWII • —irmitiresta .1 r oij j 5 0 i P4ii„.4. 1.4.1 1'jai ill IIIIV ....... ii ,,„_, arrra�.rr.rrL: =�� ,„, a' iP . .�. 111 ' I L p �� ti cifII II a 11 . +,e' lir ........isa, , ,,i.a. I Amuse ram., VA IP% al I e. It ? .uE ! .Id „"' .. re••r .ae r.rR •tom•i,. i Revl'�o,r.„i^ tmd Jwl•n• e.m..J .cenr io roti ice, a alter the�contentor tn•m•P. i ET C82/ TAVLORS FERRY RD Figure 5-4 j DOWNTOWN 1 ,4I 2� 0 'JJ m INSET 65�••a i 65i) 1 1 w e i Future I1` �`� o Q o Roadway s • Improvements • . T C l �y re F 1 i ' .� y ` Tigard Urban 1 11 1 o��'C Zy ?.. 8 .tom Planning Area ' w 2 CO' 6�ayy �� _ 41 a eaauwo"...r s LF•a W 58 Mill ._ Existing Facilities • L,, Q• • OAK ST Ir I 66a q� ♦ i r64 �> ,` '--- •'?r'' O `m m •+ PI :r Major Roads le ST •• alb:. a� ihr vt _ . +p Local Roads •6j • :• 4 ,I w 66e ` Future Facilities • s FANNO CR PARK I w /53 NORTH DAKOTA STcol® 1 ,, _Road Improvement 27 • _ 0 ISM / ,Includes padestnanand IA.facthbes, �y F 7 ® ei ,� Q !!�� /HAINrssr ■•• New Road 3. �Or`g _�r' �,0, ® .•••p®ill•\ i uncludn pcdcstri�n 0P i--F-1 �� / 2P .; •� H 1 I and Ian isolates) �� P �i ® ,�� DARTMOUTH 51 R8 Intersection Project • WALNUT 57 O) WODDSWDns. t 52 51 54 4. I •ems �� e. �l ® a NN Roadway Project s CI WNTO h.J 3 - • .uc.r<.. 1H WN 11 O x- - 011ier MapElements �-�-, ._ .:_ - /..,,,,., J+/ <,y , INSET 2 •W,,.,,.,,•„s o P / Tigard City Boundary rc _ til1 6-.) ,_�- i___ � , Transit Center 111111 27 �s .4 ' .1 K .'._, t J V ) ®i. h... .. ..••..••..ilt]f, 1� Water 41111IN..; ..... i iuxxD es,,,a. Parks e ill, cz ii Spy � •/,, ..1 f ril...rl•.....ri• \• r GAARDE 57 / MCDONALD ST.i ♦• el Ir-1 i • __-,I —1 Y_—_ ^ I I 661 so•rs e.it i r•• 1----- a ® See Figure 5-12 i tit _Is BONITA RD I l„�..r BULL MOUNTAIN RD — toTriangle s JI , 1 , _..._ � ® oT ga d ate •. 36b i ..._...._ ® I Planned .. f IN ...._ ii ..7.I. ,� 't i w• fsm ' I o Improvements LL y r7 1 N ] BEEF BEND RD” 66nL - —�- DURHAM RD 4 h-_., { ,,4,110 r_1 - 35 j 6 l m' 5 +•,' 111`,' SIp The inlosPry W on this r M p-current IF lira 2.2010. e o. II I and new l+• i 0 0.125 0.25 Jec,sim,.m amendment. t alter w •1' 1,„_,...i Milos the .,mien, ,d the map / -I FERRY RD R� .....89 .-\ Figure 5-5 8S _TAYLORS2171 FE K r: w > �,m„I •( E I Right-of-Way c ¢ Li • 2 4...)., LOCUST ST W o Needs -i. .. •1 < ` 24 2V P4J—; OAK ST [901 E iu�'.. Tigard Urban 11 S 1p�15FE , 1a �' J 0 r F PIN '110011111 Planning Area RR R\ , 3 r,—`'y..YJ� l'",`''"`� _ Roadway Cross-Section �- < w it : PFAFFLE w! AN,S,�_;7 2 to 3 Lanes ��o� _~ ti_ -,..,____ y 0,4%,� lilt op o �s 4 to 5 Lanes IIIE u N ¢ Q 7 •-� - N J �`` !V i ) • , r1 P ,� B ©�� ' 0, ` ®� 5 Lanes+Aux.Lanes WALNUT Sr - • • " �`� —( '•. / a` 1♦7 Lanes 4 �` i � wAINU?ST � �'"' ♦ DARTMOUTH ST > q�ry ®�`�� y� a Other Map Elements r ices TSS ��ag @ 17i4F� I , }- a_ ® / m `t c+ p♦„ ® 4 O Transit Center cr TC t--/ -...\ LP -.123 m l ouTaiti % �♦ Ti and Ci BoundaryNt 7� f ' 4 0 mu i `� 1• Q 5g �'pc4yn...s � • MS tri ♦* �" t Other Rail Lines I 11 444\ El liar IN 4,'C' irmi - Rp „Z'" ?� uw6i.. QQ' WAIL Q `�, --, S'S-9„ e,c +h .,,enum4...,.,. n„.„uu, \ e r GAARDE ST— iii � ♦ •) -_ c_ ti s.�.r MCDONALDST R` O♦ ' ( ,< ��@.r ni n..r.a ILII "� 111 �.� ♦.♦ 1 r. ErBONITA RD itar;jj,... 36biiiil r�ws �1 s to Tigard Triangle Planned "�PPP - . .01 ' 1 .,,.,,.,,. �� : �,,,., -Li -� Improvements BEEF BEND RD a DURHAM RD _ 9 : 14o1 - �Q: . _ SII , e �.,,.,.rmu,� • B w 2 l O ��Q • - i......i a .. X, -_ < �tRR a a�5 lig- .�__.- F .9 000 ? z. AO ry19 / y„p z '•The information represented on this 2 w '-imap is current as of February 28,2010. sj Revisions will be made as new decisions a `�"6 or amendments occur to alter the content e ,/S, a of the map. DOWNTOWN I �\ �• tt `! TAYLORSFERRY RD Figure 5-6 i INSET \0 �� • \k. 25 • • _... 89 r q , // a a® € Future R 1 Rq I ': x Pedestrian J I • ODARD PARK ®^e,. ••• El Ilk11! -E - $ •.. ® o Network 1 Mz „ "" 1 1 t 2 �• p1p -i I__ • Tigard Urban •• e,c TC pG : ., y M.._: . Planning Area 1 �., _� �`y,,1 P91 SGHOLIS FERRY RD„411 ,A®I 1 .F'.•a�� Op =0 - OAK ST ! Existing Facilities )�, j ♦S m :i: ® • .PI Sidewalk t GEST• PCI 6G �. " F, I ,;,.„, •a 1 - ..._- �14 .. Multi-Use Path r i 0/ y9� ; r::, _ • ITIi w ' Future Facilities r„ S _` in NORTH DAKOTA ST /®��FANNO CR PARK l 't,% 1 W - _... -�ii• - •• ® • • •• M U h 00 > .,, o - • ••. Siulti- se Pat k. PF••a—aa• ; - 3y E r 7 ; �, ,- �® HAINE i.;I •••• Neighborhood Path .. e a'c's mP� : • - QJk® MN ,I! • z El Roadway Project a�%a WALNUTS • ruS .q,TR .•-�., L `� ®DARTMOUTH ST Other Map Elements Y • A T ,4'� •� .'® i• �� , m3 Tc Transit Center ..!,r.i WALNUT ST m r• n•� �! • u ...•Tigard City Boundary �... -- lb, ° Ory �s •• DOWNTOWN 1r• ,,,, __r ` LY t INSET NGh • Water , •2 i 1 L Ell _ • G • Parks Gn' � 1� 1I _ ' T ii •L •. IM �. ® 1 E 7 l iik A � .� t.N r---1 am a 4 MCDONALD STEW A=LL T •i••:. _ GAARDE STA —,1_,....1 � 4 j i- . E 1 . ,,,d \. See Figure 5-12 i . BULL MOUNTAIN RD � - - — -. • • . ON A a^ T T for 2017 updates f RD >,,.,,t -t:. , j: - J ' 7• -,,■, —i- 1 ® to Tigard Triangle w• ` Planned • ; , • , �� •M o• Improvements • N4 w r ......9. 0_,....r<L-0, r • t •• V 1• rte'\ Lr•'t l < I 1 � �• ,.• ® ��o .. ur -t_ • - " R �-1. . .•.,.„„, • I �1•. "=BEEF BEND RD • - .� 1 DURHAM RD m -m ® A ��F NA —ti > o r--- €jL tee, .,-,, e- •M3• t •� „ fir••• l.f Je a Si I• Tualatin River M4 coo.vaan +, t..„-.-... '•The information represented on this �. • ... Crossing � '• Tonquin Trail mapis Claltalt as of February 2R.2010. a: • t ° to Tualatin ,, Recisions will be made as new ai '• _ dematons m'amendments occur to alter ” ... iy..:.to s•:._w. the content of the map. — 1 ` Figure 5-7 - ~ TAYLORS FERRY RD ' DOWNTOWN �\ INSET 0 ®1• ! _...,4, 25•� I. CO N Future V X44'•., �/' _.'_ 1.1_ Bicycle f°°° • M6 ii // 6, I — $ _____L_./ Z-` Network �•• TC 't i• _ �— Tigard Urban m • •.e =y - Plannin•Area ,doi N4,A••♦♦♦ / YRO ,2 ('�PL•�•w Ifi•= 0 /OHO 1.. ;.... b I I SCHOOLS FERR .. •F:W _2U ._fOAK ST Existing Facilities 6 ; L' ••• ■ 90 +�Bike Lane 10 GR 4, Ilk . �1„ .....� •Q ` ii ., Ph -'•Muhl-Use Path I, • ySp h 1 / F ♦ l m�r Future Facilities I e • •.. NORTH DAKOTA ST 1 • a:"uo ca PAW • S. Iir„ _ • I • Bike Lane ♦• O - ®J• • T to �_ ® Bike Boulevard • ..�•.. 1 �- x ,wr. 7 Q, a HAINI S sI _••• Multi-Use Path ... ... ... ... s .. ''‘P,1"..,,,,, � V ��.°��P �i�i r�`` •• ._ t9 •••• Neighborhood Path s P ^ c m I i > --• ' ® #X Roadway Project �� 4.,i: `Vi. DARTMOUTH ST v WALNUT ST , "Wej ` Other Map Elements p, y , &oanrvuw a AINUT ST- m < •®� •JL/�� a TC 1.7-1 _I x W 7 rand Center `100111/P111. � DOWNTOWN 113 TIC [ L � •�� , i INSET ''I'7i ---.? ••••Tigard City Boundai� .i i+ „ Watel Ei s , • Y.ki�, °'2y9'tiy, ••• v ® Parks is li o ,J ..ais 1 IFCiri El a.Cili , mai 4. ij .H. t;! ), ....,, /4 rq R Filki WP ♦ OSH �.i r..i...at n _11 ► 1...M r '• -09 miir MCDONALD ST Ir. ♦♦♦.. .. {\, qR F1 .1 ... .... • ■ 1 r' � i r r _ 1 ,® .o M'1� ® See Figure 5-12 Bt9 _ t r- • .• BONITARD ®, for 2017 updates BULL MOUNTAIN RD MI _' _. ;_y BZS 3 to Ti and Triangle w �_� 9 Ill 1 I J IIII a Planned > �1 j _ :• # 11..r... _ Improvements 1 - Qii, P I 4.4Vriffielk AM 1 1. ..... nip +- • DURHAM RD1E11lis ® F� - If •BEEF BEND RD V Ilk 4,k PM IMK III IR 1Il 11 $a • S. t • n 1MSt .,Thei f u 7. represented on ib. mr Tuatatin River M4 i coo.ran 5 map,.c- + t February 2a Zen. �� • • Crossing _ ' Tonguin Trail .// am m,1u will he made . ,• �, t •'\ to Tualatin aller'+the M,rm'Irnl an,: he C1 ../MO 5 map e`_ Cm" DOWNTOWN f/ I p„ BZ TAYLORS FERRY RD Figure 5-9 INSET +.,®- ® m7 i _ 3........—}------, , N Transportation 1 .....\ . • - / �� - eA .., ®• i Improvements 1 TCI o — - d$C)�4 \_/ ?i % I Tigard Urban ! �, 1' _..0;I OG / •y ' i _ Planning Area ,� \ 4 e �� / • nv RD ., 9L�� w 2 r —1— �NS GS, ® 1 SCROLLSFER exG,.ew000naaa tn: a W 58 0 ST i Existing Facilities tI` .y : •w ? OAK I. i e3 ' �y, 1, 1 > �a i PI : ! Major Roads �yB� �'i I !' 1 a ` r r. .J6..... ..t r 66d Local Roads 1 1 N U 217 ?s`' 66e /La Multi-Use Path `. r / ..._ ,.._ * 1 , - H NORTH DAKOTA ST '- = Future Facilities Z� ��FANNOC�ARK / • e F ,^ '-8. -7 11,114‘ NES 5T Intersection Project g- M 'j / ,� _... {� \ o ## Roadway Project HAI L �Ni O 4." �i". Mk, 1#6-42 1 DARTMOUTH ST I HCT Corridor WALNUT ST 'I.. ,� pr" h� i.. _ 6- 52l •••• Neighborhood Path 54 1Y �� , q/' • Y • nra•ewe ti woo-ail- i '•'1, El Y Roel Improvements _r. --•. �.� R N4,` DOWNTOWN 11 t:04,,. /G = Road Improvement `, r i ,, ado tiGls� INSET : N2jkF. w (includes pedestrian 01' and bike facilities) ` ' 1, !! .._,Iy — '--- _ ' Xe... I. Complete Streets i p ! .O (add,sidewalks and 2 J ..>_] /\ t . i,\ hike lanes) F, I /�. I IIIII �•.. n:.. x �� 3P �1` i6 �Sidewalk i � �!� A� Apr �irdi ,T� N. �Bike Lane 40 r `_ .� -- 4 ®t �\� Bike Boulevard w� MN Sy� I • � • N J ,.. g WALL .� ♦ ki‘h',014 Nr..Facilinea •qai •...•• -- GAARDE ST MCDONALD ST -Q -..., ) tr C r. s `66k m PC _^ .. '• ), ••• New Roap JBULL MOUNTAIN RD t r •1, •1 / -— • (includes pedestrian �.1_�• g ... Multi-Use L 1 __ t I mes. �. �� — 1 _ •�'"�: See Figure 5-12 facilities)Path I %• __. •- • •L® BONITARD� ® ;'-' L , _ BC3 m for 2017 updates other p laments t ■r 3 to Tigard Triangle OO Ma E .i i , - (r`; 66 o a Planned TC Transit Center / F •'—.!... I 3 11 _ _.o Improvements ••••Tigard City Boundary vim, .. � f r ..." 1117,2117:) ,1: � O' _ Water _` i 7 ..� _. , Parks BEEF !(ID ��•� I� I e9 O L. . BEND RD , DORHAM RD ) .w j T,__ ". I <AO 5 A4°' r .. Q Ei 4_� • ••• -t `s -�j1 O'er �.1Si F, � 4,.......... 6 ' I n The information represented this ! i Tong=Trail �� map current ia of February 2h 2010. 4 • • to Tualatin 0 0.125 0 25 O S duisiun.or uma,dments ocenr,o alrcr NEAR-TERM PROJECTS ... i 4 P'''''''• ''''w a . DOWNTOWN 1 25 TAYLORS FERRY RD \ Figure 5-10 • rte\\ INSET eCy'w : i �� 1 m� - ! N 6 ,,l_ uiI P F J IM6 _ 1 — Transportation IM2'.. � 8 ® -$ -'- , Improvements • ...111 • /C)b44 �0121 1:C, ; 1 P10] [. , i Tigard Urban N1 OG �i :y 0 Kd.IL.„ , ��''F' Planning Area . .9tAG 1 FERRY RD 11 s�� w = " _ B30 __ [ N 'P OLLS F• ¢ W 56 .: ! Existing Facilities 66a- �,P 2s, ® SGH 1`7,' i w �® ` i _-OAK ST 1 I 14,7 IN `IIr , `,..9' - :U C7 [\ 90 r Pw• F Major Roads • 9e� itkokT j, r a �\- q s ''1'...1 16 d __ Local Roads .. ,1s1 . I.' _ { ti : is a�......_ / —Multi-Use Path zJ ••t FANNO CR PARK 1 . m NORTH DAKOTA ST ' ® ® ® Future Facilities 1 53 11*' a E J® x .. ..._. .�...�:.._..._..._..._...�.. .._ - L s _. � Intersection 4 F Y� .,, 1'1 I� .Cy w '- ©® HAINFS 91 0 Project O� M W i.- t —� Olt _ '7 ._..eo®�• 50 #7t Roadway Project CO ora bP 5,,5;,,) -- -i O PC5 `' }.„-. • ••• - HCT Corridor BC4 •• ,•• ` DARTMOUTH ST 9,. WAL ;- K " aq[� • •52 Si •••• Neighborhood Path � s r .xoR,xvrew PARK NUT1 I •;®♦ qq[.�•. n ®..Y �• Road Improvements - � � LTJ UT SF `` s �� WALN 6 lyq<HG • DO NSETwN 11 X41,, - F Road Improvement �•I;1„ ___ �_ ''SF ��.,MVP 1 ' ® and(includes ^°” i �` Iir i P ! —Complete Streets m i.� �. ' \ ♦ ®�O (adds sidewalks aid S ! •.1 or! ., i • 27 '1� bike lanes) O iii / _ ..... .......-..-.. r j _ / .. 11. '.AAxeCAAARK] •N ¢i ®� Sidewalk � Bike Lane -r rlii - M�, ,V2h J- 4 ® \� c` ��'� �� Bike Boulevard ROS `... ........_....\.'1 _ 5 - .. WAI.IS1 •44$♦ Nov Fxeilitie. �1 a.. • J-L 9. ,f'F Y.....,,,1 a.-...........-....; I s W GAARDE ST .1‘661c MCDONALD ST �4, ® iilil 4 , '" 5 ••• New Road Om ® n ix (includes pedestrian IL ♦ BULL MOUNTAIN ". .. _ PA n d bike facilities) - NTAIN RD 1 ONI RD �M'• See Figure 5-12 +•• Multi-Use Path 1 m . : .--""'/ ,,6251 - a �y,� TABC3 D 36b 1 for 2017 updates ti r� V _ ... P6 / '. •1'r ® e to Tigard Triangle • 1 l 1 . t. ., ` •'•...- 66 „ o a Planned Other Map Elements 1 alb.. V•,-' • f IT » ® riwz r o — Improvements $ '-`J * - E f �I -, b Li.. . - Ifi\ TTransit Center al ip = Illt• e 011111 e _ _I ® . o ••••Tigard City Bo undary .♦ y ( r�` z pr * I ilp BEEFBDRD - DURHAMRD- 6T 4j::s- r 0 ..– if / • /- a 1•''a .1 ni 1 ES 8 �.. . I JM3, . V. Tualatin River MA a• �••�'• 6 Th i r r p ented on Mr a� • Crossing ! Tonquin Trail p t rFebruary ls.2010. ko to Tualatin n5 R ll M1 de a neu NEAR& MID-TERM PROJECTS _ // .. d amendments nto to alcor the wn content of he colter •I: .. -...--... DOWNTOWN Atemouri % 0 ,,, TAYLORS FERRY RD Figure 5-11 INSET / 41.1 89 -414111'. ' , ".°6- Il•• zo. 4 0 ,, - ! • , Ti .1 _i r ,...1 - , \ I — Transportation 1.1 :13, 12-V4t.t.• EI ! P1 el' I 1. 1 i . : (r— : z..._ , Improvements ii A1040%., 1 ! 114.,isti 14,o '11,4 ' 1 p,.1 qa - -_ i Tigard Urban 0 I \ 4FIS, ri,-- '...1,1.... ‘ Planning Area 1. 6417, i ,,., Is..i., , a ' 1 Foltril Scmoos,- ,,,o.,, ,,1, . kt,c' k 5...8 4$1, - owl -OAK sr i Existing Facilities PC 7 4'44 64 E6a Sr> S• ' ! w ...•Major Roads ISA Yr' C)' - --- Local Roads •7,946 • .0 \1 , • .* 0 ,66(1) ...Multi-Use Path ..7ANNO CR PARI( . --.0 )---') IF‘: i4111111.111 .-H--E531121:_.„. _:I 19.111°01;41:5 114W.7:1:217. trj 1111;:iPiir'.!° 1212:15' PI6N65:(:j -/i NORTH DAKOTA ST . .no" Future Facilities • \ ! •.-.. c9 0 Intersection Project ,w HAINES ST - ElRoadway Project pp% i , 2 4SP iii•Itl!,'....—............... ,, i lifi:a'rt7hr) ".•,,2 HCT Corridor % I I ..... ,z,43-BC4 .."4,,,,i,_..„,.. Am...I.WO ,,, ie,. DARTMOUTH ST I WALNUT ST IL:. ' - 1 , •••• Neighborhood Path cpp . 52 in 51 I, ,5,-1' '- .; '21-qVe 1 'rkar 4141; a ' $ ,. [ -- __ ____ 5V0.111VIEW PI I AK i i:, ' ..,,,bi-Is. 13 1..._ <,-- Ilis•„, ' "r" lij DOWNTOWN „1,,,, .0711 - INSET " 'AN, - cl. rier i ''' Ei 5 ' Road Improvements •••••Road Improvement (Includes iledeslnan and bike hellion.) IIIII.Complete Streets eP. .\Tit I ,, kt,la.0 (adds adman,and ••'Er , 1 , El boke lanesI -,...„,,,,i,,, ) ,Alla 1 IIII ''- ' WO I.... ... '.'..a- 64-; .S Ilkii\, 0 as " 4 • .. I\ -1. 7;oir t _r: i ioab in i \ -......„-7 ,.i.c.ii, • '- -. El 1 —Sidewalk 5ps. 44;2' va:v/ .._ ,,,.......' ,.....„ Bike Lane ....."'v Bike Boulevard New FaellItiet GAARDE ST ' ca ,c3 MCDONALD ST AIL', 0'0 ill • ---I , 1....S rj :" mik,66k MF° iL '• ••• New Road 661/ Ei_ L ti' 824 .,,,;,,Att (Includes pedestroan and boke faeolones. -----. 1-1518 -—,14". See Figure 5-12 ••• Multi-Use Path . I3ULL MOUNTAIN RD to '-'-'IN.ti 4,1-L.t3 BONITA RD ...NI El /.•-I B25for 2017 updates P6 _ i C3 NU 360 Other Map Elements to Tigard Triangle - — _r__,: • I !.. " P27 Es -, ,- §: < x Planned (TD To ansot Center L•ti -1 . Li ... • 0 0. .• ..1 ..., 1P2717,_ ,...- - -9 ra : ,,..z -5 Improvements ••-•Togatd Coty 1 Boulaim----(-. %leo I L. -__\•__ , '45, I Pao ks igirr • s.,. i jpipaH11111VINO i p ,r_. , ••• . . BEEF BEN ID' ---411.111.111° )61 • DURHAVRD larj 05-10 ... t: t ( .1. 1j7....j..;. I.. ..'..., n; A SI "*. i. Tualatin River ppm \ co.,..,,,, —ThIn e foomatton es leprcnted on this .,.,.. Crossi • um '' "-- f% map a mar.t as of February 25.2010 ts Tonquin Trail , Reststons made as nen Ma 1 to Tualatin 0 0(2':. 0 2', WA he ---. dectnons or amendments occur to aher A LL PROJECTS ,.!-- - I.__:, .—=.....=,...— .. the "'Went ot the map "�L_—�' 1 I 66d Figure 5-12 �I VI—,I Tigard Triangle • - i-- - .1 Irl/ ,I 66e t NPlanned Improvements _ \ / .\ TigardUrban•, PlanningAreai66fI Existing and Planned Facilities" i ) 1 LL.... 00°1111'/ d , • PIistjng Street PFAFFLE sso = M10,, armed Street n r1�,1. -.._, i/11 , / I /7/::: Existing Trail / I MN Om BAYLOR \50,, ATLANTA 3 Planned Trail 669 I ♦ _ ATLA — -..j - MI Future Path \,,, 66c A j I -- Bike Lane(Both Sides) 66b 1 O 0p m I I Bike Lane(East Side) = CLINTON I Planned Intersection (Locatjonlllustrative) 1) I, a z 1 1 )11 38 , ,,, \ ( •• F Planned Improvements 0 1`P s ( #.l Intersection Project c0Ttis ••• ELMHURST .__ ~•1 •• 0Street Project I ® HERMOSO ') ••••••'•• 1 I A Trail Project 9 FRANKLIN • P '. TSM3 ---_ 0, ki BEVELAND ' I .11 CV,I • , 1.... I Cr Tigard City Boundary 4D C•I 1 /M11. 9� HU 1 M GONZAGA I. P BLyN22 z:,0 HAMPTON 1 4 I I I i N4111\..........� ........ I •All existing streets should include pedelrian and bicycle facilities consistent with adopted standards, s eist Facility s arc not shown g IIII\ I but his map pbet should beuddressed at the time I of developmentor through the city's capital improvement program. . This map is provided for illustrative .I Shilli1/4„, purposes.The complete list of projects is provided in Table 5-0. WPI 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 �. .*The information represented on this map is 5curr,) ent as of October 2,2017.Revisions will be made as new decisions or amendments occur Miles \ to alter the content of the map. i Development of the 2035 TSP Exhibit 6.2 A notable finding from this step was that there were projects from previous planning efforts that no longer meet the community goals.As such,the following projects were removed from the TSP: Nimbus Avenue Extension due to environmental impacts to Fanno Creek and related cost effectiveness. 0 Wall Street Extension due to cost effectiveness and potential environmental justice impacts. New interchange on Highway 217 at the extension of SW 68th Avenue due to inconsistency with the RTP and ODOT plans. Step 4: Review of Bridge Projects Due to their high costs,the projects requiring bridge structures to cross highways and railroad tracks were considered to determine if all were necessary,identify which projects were most desired within the planning horizon as well as those that should be include for the purpose of long-term right-of- way protection.This review identified existing plans for a total of seven grade-separated crossings. The individual project evaluations in Step 3 were supplemented with the overall review of the number of costly grade-separated crossing proposed.On that basis,the following crossings have been removed from the TSP or modified: Northern Washington Square Regional Center crossing(Highway 217 crossing)was modified to a pedestrian and bicycle connection only. Wall Street extension(railroad crossing)was removed due to cost effectiveness and potential environmental justice impacts as described as part of Step 3. 0. Dartmouth Street/Hunziker connection(over Highway 217)was removed due to cost and redundancy with the Hunziker Street/Hampton Street Connection. Durham Road extension under I-5 was not included due to limited system benefits and cost effectiveness. The following crossings were recommended to remain in the 2035 TSP: Northern Washington Square Regional Center crossing(as pedestrian/bike connection only) f Southern Washington Square Regional Center crossing H unziker Street/BevelandRoad(IbrmerlyHampton Street)connecti on over Highway 217 Step 5 Step 5 of the alternatives analysis included evaluation of potential new roadway projects that would benefit overall multi-modal system operations.Two of the notable new projects in the 2035 TSP include the North Dakota-Pfaffle Neighborhood Route and North Dakota realignment.These projects are envisioned to occur in tandem with or subsequent to realignment of Tiedeman to the west away from the North Dakota-Greenburg Road intersection. The North Dakota-Pfaffle neighborhood route and North Dakota realignment would provide a much needed east-west connection between Pfaffle and North Dakota Street over Highway 217 and would provide an alternative to Pacific Highway and Walnut Street for travel between east and west 4.16 City of Tigard 2035 TSP Transportation System Plan Special Areas The following section identifies the three areas within the city—Tigard Triangle,Washington Square Regional Center and Downtown Tigard—with growth opportunities but also significant transportation challenges.Each of the three areas are described below,including a summary of current transportation challenges,followed by strategies for infrastructure investments which are depicted in Figures 5-12 through 5-15. In addition to improvement projects,this 2035 TSP identifies non-SOV mode split targets for the Tigard Triangle that are higher than required by the Metro RTP(see Table 5-3).Achieving these targets will require integrated land use and parking management strategies. Land Use Planning Each of these areas is designated for significant housing and employment growth.Development of commercial and residential uses in close proximity to each other promotes walking trips for commute trips and non-commute travel.These opportunities can be captured by incorporating densities, mixed-uses,design standards and other land use strategies in the overall planning efforts for the areas. An initial look at land use alternatives will occur with the initial phases of HCT planning.Development patterns that support HCT—such as mixed uses,higher densities,pedestrian orientation—will encourage the public investments necessary to implement HCT.As future transportation and land uses studies for HCT move forward,they will help to identify complementary land use and transportation investments to support HCT and other transit service to Tigard. Parking Management Parking management will be a critical component of creating travel options to and from each sub-area. Adequate parking is essential to economic vitality;at the same time too much parking can degrade the pedestrian environment and cause excessive physical space dedicated to parking.A review of parking requirements and parking management measures is warranted in conjunction with land use planning for these areas.In particular,as more emphasis and investment is directed toward walk,bike and transit trips, the amount of parking and the way that it is used will be modified to support the priority purposes of each area. Tigard Triangle The Tigard Triangle is a priority opportunity for community development and economic activity.The Triangle has long been a retail and commercial hub within the city.Today,the Triangle is zoned for commercial and mixed-use development and is identified as an area of significant future growth in housing and jobs.Although the area is bordered by three major regional roadways,these roadways function as barriers to access the Triangle.Travel to and from the Triangle is funneled from Pacific Highway via 72nd Avenue,Dartmouth Street and 68th Parkway;the Highway 217/72nd Avenue interchange;the northbound I-5 interchange with Haines Street;and the southbound 1-5 interchange with Dartmouth Street 2035 TSP City of Tigard 5.73 Transportation System Plan Access to and from the Tigard Triangle area is,and will remain,a critical issue to the success of the area.The majority of employees and customers traveling to the area on city streets access the Tigard Triangle area off of Pacific Highway.There is considerable congestion on Pacific Highway in the vicinity of the Tigard Triangle,and this congestion is forecast to worsen with future development and regional growth. A second issue with the Triangle relates to non-auto mobility/circulation to, from, and within the area.The Triangle area as a whole is generally sloping downward from Pacific Highway and I-5 to Highway 217.The topography makes pedestrian and bicycle transportation difficult. These conditions are worsened by incomplete bicycle and pedestrian systems within the Triangle. At the broadest level, options for improving access to the Tigard Triangle area fall into the following categories: Provide additional intersection and roadway capacity improvements to improve traffic operations at the boundary streets. Provide additional roadway capacity as development occurs to support a pedestrian- oriented development pattern. Maximize existing infrastructure investments by focusing on parking management and travel demand management programs. Provide a more integrated system of transportation options for pedestrians,cyclists, and transit users. Figure 5-12 shows the existing and planned transportation facilities in the Tigard Triangle that improve access to,from, and within the area.New streets,trails,and paths are designed to complete the original street grid pattern and provide additional circulation options for all modes of travel. New bridges to the east and west are intended to overcome the barriers created by Highway 217 and Interstate 5 and create a better connection with Downtown Tigard. In addition to providing bicycle and pedestrian facilities along the entire length of 72nd Avenue,a 72nd Avenue corridor study is needed to determine segment-specific cross sections that address the competing multimodal transportation needs along this corridor. Specific project considerations for the Tigard Triangle can be found in Technical Memorandum #5 in the Volume 3 Technical Appendix. 5.74 2035 TSP City of Tigard TABLE 5-6: MULTI-MODAL PRO ECT IMPROVEMENT LISTmi Project4 Special Time Financially Cost ID Name Project Type Description Area Jurisdiction Frame Constrained Estimate Add signal and northbound right turn lane on 65th Ave at Haines St 65th Avenue/Haines Intersection Tigard 3 Street Improvement to maintain or improve mobility, Triangle Portland Near-term Yes6 $1,000,000 queuing,and safety for TPR5 compliance Complete interchange Highway 217/72nd reconstruction with additional lanes Interchange to maintain or improve mobility, Tigard 4 Ave Interchange Improvement queuing,and safety for TPR5 Triangle ODOT Near-term Yes $30,000,000 Improvements compliance,such as the addition of a second northbound right turn lane Wall Street/Tech Complete Wall St from Hunziker Rd 15 Center Drive New Road to terminus and extend to Tech Tigard Near-term No $6,000,000 Extension' Center Dr along railway Extend Atlanta Street west Atlanta Street Tigard 19 extension New Road from 69th Ave to future Triangle Tigard Mid-term Yes $6,000,000 74th Ave Highway 217 Construct new Highway 217 Tigard ODOT/ 23 overcrossing at New Bridge overcrossing to connect Beveland Triangle/ 1i Mid-term Yes $30,000,000 Beveland Rd to Hunziker Rd Tigard Downtown Extend 74th Ave south from Pacific Tigard 28 74th Avenue extension New Road Highway to Hermoso Wy or Triangle Tigard Mid-term Yes6 $5,000,000 Beveland Rd 72nd Avenue 31 widening:Pacific Roadning Widen to 4/5 lanes T gargle Tigard Mid-term Yes $8,000,000 , WidHighway to Dartmouth Widen to 4 lanes plus turn lanes and sidewalks between 72nd Ave and 1-5(68th Ave)to maintain or 38 Dartmouth Street Road improve mobiity,queuing,and Tigard ;Tigard Near-term Yes $3,000,000 widening Widening safety for TPR5compliance,such as Triangle i the addition of a second westbound j through lane and dedicated westbound left turn lane at 68th Ave TABLE 5-6 MULTI-MODAL PRO ECT IMPROVEMENT LIST :` I Project 11 Name Project Type Description' Special Jurisdiction Time Financially Cost ID Area Frame Constrained Estimate i 50 68th Avenue/Atlanta Intersection Add traffic signal and turn lanes Tigard Tigard Near-term No $500,000 Street Improvement where necessary Triangle Intersection improvements to Pacific Highway/I-5 Intersection maintain or improve mobility and ODOT / 66d Southbound(SB) Improvement safety for TPRS compliance,such I Portland Near-term Yes $100,000 Ramp as the removal of the northbound left turn lane/signal at 64th Ave 1 Multi-use Path Projects Construct new hard surface trail Tigard M10 Red Rock Creek Trail New Trail along Red Rock Creek parallel to Triangle Tigard Long-Term Yes $3,000,000 and south of Pacific Highway Construct new pedestrian bridge ODOT, over Interstate 5 between M11 Beveland Pedestrian New Bridge Beveland Rd in Tigard to Tigard Tigard, Long-Term Yes6 $6,000,000 Bridge Triangle Clackamas Southwood Dr in Clackamas County County Transportation System Management ' Arterial Provide arterial corridor mgt. TSM4 72nd Avenue Corridor along Corridor#19(Hwy 217)in Tigard Mid-term No $1,700,000 Management the Metro TSMO Plan 3 These projects were modified in 2017 to be consistent with other Tigard Triangle planning documents:3,4, 19,23,28,29,31,37,38,50,51,52,66d,M10,M11, and TSM4.Projects 3,28,M10,and Ml1 were added.Projects 29,37,51,and 52 were deleted because they were completed or no longer needed.The descriptions and cost estimates for Projects 4, 19,23,38,and 66d were revised.All other edits were minor. 'All road projects include bicycle and pedestrian facilities,consistent with adopted street design standards. 5TPR generally refers to the Oregon Transportation Planning Rule(OAR 600-012-0060)and specifically to the TPR compliance report that was completed in November 2017 for the Tigard Triangle rezone.This report identified the need for TPR mitigation projects and led to the addition of Proj ect 3 and the modification of Projects 4,38,and 66d. 6 These projects are proposed to be included in the 2018 RTP financially constrained project list. 'This project was added in 2017 to be consistent with the city's economic development initiatives for the Hunziker Industrial Core Area. The project timelines identified in Table 5-6 are depicted in Figure 5-9, Figure 5-10 and Figure 5-11. The first figure shows only near-term projects; Figure 5-10 shows the combined Near-term and Mid-term projects. Figure 5-11 shows all of the planned projects. i' ,,,, Figure 5-2 imiliMINit Roadway merleIli Functional VIM" : i Classification , d Tigard Urban Milli -s-aiPlanning Area , OA) ., r i in 2�- Freeway rr� iiIiWiriita umi -•+++ onpp.til •, _ ' �,\` �1 Area(STA) � , �i� �+� ' •Future Roadways A21 a �i Other Map Elements • • � ` -7 _II ;11P ...*Veirl 4WIC _ _..._.. Tc Transit Gema L ..n. Olyr' • r.... oun �'' .r Tigard City B dan " ..;+ri.; See Figure 5-12 �other Rail Lincs b for complete _ i-7i r•. Tigard Triangle ■ gxrrr i �� IIIIII 1r • + Transporation �: ,. .*. 01 trti �` ' Asp, �tairla Network i 06 • ,, iiir 4 n ... .. O." am ,,2 r reiviasta, 4,,,,, ILI i- iiirii,viriLnimilsdpi -1,!, -r' .ij El tAL1 1 ir.,116... ill, Eon p___ i MI #4.11111 2 II Ali:by , 11 AUKII. lan" 16 mi i r.rw.ar �� N s p_ siowl 1 ' Wen illi I, i ,;C�[ •• F I I informationp aemeJ on this i. , p of October 2.2017 72 on. will be madem new O. e O.tm k iaiw endmenta°aunt° !"'"'l iarar..r. nn�lea m rb mnnti<m.r j DOWNTOWN ry 1 0 25 TAYLORS FERRY RD _. \ Figure 5-4 : INSET �` 89 Imo•• \1 ' � 66i, 1 m j L v Future 0 1 ® 1 y I Roadway : I o .1 — I ' — Improvements 1 T C 5��R. •• 41, _y ! __. Tigard Urban 1 1 tt`, \-\' 2 • 2 e a, ' } Planning Area j �� 6'G,i,2 1� I w '4T H enm o...es aF ra ®• JO Ea 1101 _ I _i , Existing Facilities G ,t • m• U 0 1, �` .y W •• 9D OAK ST -{. 66a his♦ I • i� �8,44�_.. PI, T • Myor Roads tr l . 41b. ¢ _ , • 6 '.e 1 N _4 '` ` �, v k - —• Local Roads sr >e'. btu ♦� .• .• _N __. -- • t- > © Future Facilities ♦ 27 •••FANNO CR PARK I 53 - NORTH DAKOTAST a I _ pm CD Road Improvement .,,—•, = area PARK ®y. ® _ ® 'j�j� iincluJes pedestrian _:•� • ...�..._...�..._ ...�..._..._ .. ..._..._ O SIMMER _ co © end Juke fealties( HAINFS Sl y> z� B ) 1 _I i i ♦ �.. a !17 ....New Road � I '..•� ( ` J4. :♦ 1 ••o®iii (includes pedestrian { SD J ) /oo t. ® DARTMOUTH S'DARDMRKo._1 14 - 7.a,•� .e♦ `� �I ## Roadway Project t •' RTNwaw - y i o pxnr.i ._ n - WAlNU1.51 m i DOWN a TOWlirN DOW G • INSET ».GNr7R F � Other Map Elements i a i Sf mrd F • R •••••••r Tigard City Boundary .n.Nar..•m•n o i cf 11 I B J. s !c` I I a I /'� 411) .V 27 •♦� r' ' 23 3 8 Tc Transit Center ••••• r l �i. ...,..fit♦f' `1, 5 Water O %...__...1 �. - i l L. r..... ...... a Parks .L_..._ -.' F, ' RINNOCR MRR ♦, , r liiii i. . ...., J), c 6 U ROS !Y ` r / '. I--1 QP I ,HAIL ST •♦i •♦ S RD r�� ' __........, \I tl GAARDE ST 6k MCDONALD ST 9k r' ._P...1 1� ,m X60 ♦♦i ... )r H iI. .—___.._.. o- s.m PR y 1 �eutLMouTA��Y` ® : ® See Figure 5-12 r Y N RD _ BONITA RD ®: for 2017 updates an.,,.r.•ry 'i {Y---_ r- to Tigard Triangle tt ¢ Qyi �-:� l..._......� 66m ® o o Planned y �. L I-o _ Improvements I rie Win.,+.cc.r,• _ ' ' 1 Lii o /I6' 01 "."'" .i•c.marc _.. L , _ c.. BEEF BEND RD 66 '"- -,-' DURHAM RD wICIll... • 0 l ✓f ksh� ® ? '4.5 • .. ......._.. �T • ♦♦♦. . El ,•.•.\ coon Pane I. r m•_.. 5 ••Tne.nn�rm•amn represented..n mix • rr' // mnpix •ntax of F<nrnary 2x,2010. { •••. Rcvi . will M mete x nuw lter • / • the content e or amendment,oD.nlDaA. B, �• he of the map. N• 25J -� .._.TAYLORS-.FERRY RD .....I N\ Figure 5-5 co La , iril ) g ¢ II '1---7 W„ o 1• Right-of-Way M . � �.wr�il LOCUST ST. .... �, i in Needs ■ �� _ ¢ 2z , Iii- l a,b U : w 24 p r- 7-1-1{1 r Tigard Urban Q �? • HpILS FERRY RD - ,.—3�GN '• `� oil _ l---o wsrin....l " _ IN Planning Area u. lll n> 0 * - x = m �/ Roadway Cross-Section 0 Q9 > >� ` / 413111 lig 7q PFAFFLE F Q, Tl ¢ \�.-- w=.:i 1.. /,) Ilk • — w HAINES ST 2 t0 3 Lanes jos' L- M _ ®�,'• I OP o _ �� 4 to 5 Lanes °� — aP �� ►. � �`' ®� ME 5 Lanes+Aux.Lanes WALN " . 0...--'' / -_ --- •: . 0.' ``h �g _7 Lanes uTSr �o t.,,a 8 1� ` WAIN 48 I ~.�y -it''' 400°'' .`�� .� tiG a UT 5T DARTMOUTH ST. > I s ®� F Other Map Elements g ® r 4 �P` eGP p• R 4 TC Transit Center q o >"n ' 2y yS� ••1�� P� ® E ' g Y �� Tigard Cit Boundary In _ w i ��, 3 �\ �- +a+l++ Other Rail Lines NW ..... ROS ; 4....... ri- i • /`T �cT�� , yJAIIS�•��.� 4.1ChA,F�OxO..wm _ ► r _A RDE ST ,©1l MCDONALD ST , __ ''4i• ipr Erg ill ll • ONTAINRD . uqjP1T H, ' a Planned f _ '' t I rovements —�� to 4 mp =■u■uSnun■a■ow RD" .rte' ♦ O BEEF BEND DURHAM RD �, -- Q 12 ai LI x tII o ¢ f'`� 4<" l co m 4 fr F i; ww N e"' OQ o -- a�� z **The information represented on this w map is current as of February 28,2010. Revisions will be made as new decisions E., or amendments occur to alter the content i // ; o 0.15 as IIF of the map. Myna • / i■�wwn,: Miles i i 3 DOWNTOWNV " TAYLORS FERRY RD Figure 5-6 INSET 0 �j. 89 R �'. 5 v N Future I Aq`RA,C� �'•/la I Y.t`.11 B $ r. Pedestrian I•I ® Network YYOODARO PARK M2I ; �,1 ,.h^^ y % . Prov] �� :F.__ +"...J -.i Tigard Urban • TC\ 1� � .....1 t�P , 1 s RRv R F L a.> -�� __..�y ,. .1..":�..., _ • t Planning Area t • 8 S ' •� SCROLL .'` 1 •• a+ ®•2U - NOM OAK ST r-. rl Existing Facilities �, _%® N. •� 1 5'FE ,, F a,N \... ::xi: �..•I . . _ i Sidewalk •PI GrSr• IPC7J eG +. �4 1 ._- w �"a., •U \ . L . •�Muln-Use Path 2y'�� • 277 •""••" pi Facilities Ve..... 19yS�, l I aribill in - NORTH DAKOTA ST • - • • :•a ...: Sidewalk 0FANNO CR PARK \ -rR'i"i ••• Multi-Use a' I w _. --- -±---r.---�"' ' ® • let / P th Future l'''' ... I % • y�`�r � f� - a PF ?® HAW ES ST •••• Neighborhood Path �- O r ,,, B ctS P16'e: - • 4,. 4 ••¢•Jm; • e•s o 8i- �- L IT 1 •. 1 r rr,� j•' 4��\�' '_ #a• Roadway Project F' " vow P , ,,,,,,:,4,,,,,,,,,,, DARTMOUTH Si Other Map Elements 9 WALNUTST Q4.;iron aM2� •" 1� m- a D. TC Transit Center nnr.vIrw.... ��, WALNUT�T m .,,.. I% ` DOW®WN O alyG - • a ••••Tigard City Boundary „�. is,-; "1, INSET 1,„r • - Pater 'Pe- ryo ,, • F. ri e ;~;e ,_, . t E gipSp' Warm arks o= t 4i • IEl- awe Li 1 1 uS x• , .,.. SMS] • / _� 1 ® 4�' 7lir- 111 m • Roy � �� j — 0``-4 ST 1111.• - •• ' • __ __.GAARDE ST QP MCDONALD ST` : _ ••••�•'. 1 I „Sii +y ,_BULL MOUNTAIN RD�� •'"4• \; See Figure 5-12 I (• ) • BONITA RD (J ' ...c.. _ P6 y ,.e P a,i j aha for 2017 updates Iv , �� ...� 2T , to Tigard Triangle i 4 IAN111._ � I Planned x ,. o Improvements • a IC. L. • R LI _.,‘ spy ....ii --,,,,\--,,,,. ,. I... Aim.......,„„erjailliaa . - h ,..Limilift: „„, ,.. ,- -, r \ - BEEF BENDDUR .1111111r • _ -'� HAM RD" ® m — .• is ., yF��Q. � z.�J i:•....•. ,.. � Q, SliM3 • 1 s. , ,`° Tualatin River -�< .'- ••• '•The information represented on this •'a Crossing Tonguin Trail ,^•" map is ems rnt as of Febmary 28,2010. ■` • s ) : to Tualatin p 5 R sm 0 I he made as nen 3 J endmenls ncom ro otter s°.n•^•• •^•„ M les• [h commit o[ the map INSET — ®� -' ..® ,� ® 25' -W D \ Figure 5-7 0 > _ m �..� DOWNTOWN TAYLORS FERRY R 1 ' 1 Future I _ ' ,lik ___ Bicycle • ,M. m••. El e. T$ �I Network �▪ � ... ' ��TC , 2 ♦i R .«._... i._ � 1 .. Tigard Urban S-c♦♦ O /j ,i �e ,iek •e _-rh �.. "'�. � Planning Area PvN ♦♦ ♦� s .i "gym ? B30 0 _..._.__.. _i__�.,. It...� 1 CI` ♦i • RY RD rewoon ,, 9L• .W ' _ O � 1 O,-L`'fER 'F♦ < <u O -' I I, ExistingFacilities IVP SOH i w 2 . OAK STIli 1 ,� 1 @G >♦♦♦. ; ® IV .. ___ .N ''c 82-..,••« 24 _PI'' 1 Bike Lane .. 9 7 }}!.._I - Mul[i-Use Path T a t - ♦ w k Future Facilities 1 m • ,.. ••• lir car.Rx ♦♦♦♦ 1 -� NORTH DAKOTA ST CIE < • • Bike Lane W' • ♦s g° '1 < • ., I ®Qlit ® Bike Boulevard ▪ N •• y •� ♦. 1 5 �, 11 < HAINES ST •••• Multi-Use Path ms i � '._,•-r �- �pk' .it t4,rr,',;.; �`� N a... Neighborhood Path '" 0 0 _ - • _ ~ � Ell #k Roadway Project • w 9 WALNUT 11 Ir \11111 DARTMOUTH ST Y 1 i y Si 1 .. } . Other Map Elements ;; r y..:. `1-_�. ".: WAOIUT SI-- ♦k-♦'Tct a y y TC TransitCenter r•ergs IDOWNTOW , . ® S ,1 ,:HI. ° � pop, i INSET s ,'1'Ii' - ----.ie ••••TigardCty Boundary a �' '� I .Gryry� ®® m Water c a ,1 27 qis .�♦♦ • v • .... Parks • O � - ^fes ••` talplei e . , pi . ` �..;q.Mq•4•.,�®,+l'.�, S1Q �a\ S ini a- ' -11,,i ' NIL ' 40 0 , .., ,-,„ . v.:- , A 44, irr„ , --..„-,_ 4,, I, 1.,, --F El \ ._. 13 —10 pb.' I•t.."r.�• °SH,y� , . r GAARDE ST QIni .0 �' MCDONALD ST 1 ♦♦♦♦ * - , -', Ma Illi ‘,...., ria sol;1111\,, .C -� `��` t • � ® See Figure 5-12 t BONITA RD 36b �- for 2017 updates ,i �, BULL MOUNTAIN RD .�. t r,.ai ` ____. ® 3' o Tigard Triangle w® ■ _ - Planned . ¢ I ao Improvements '- r -* •_-_ , lily a"." M ill `,2 8i i i lipi'mpiraiM .,, , ..I ill ,, n Famakwatraotil . '‘‘‘' ' ' MEW ' Fil 2 :, E ___. ter..,s , •,.rr,r, ® F,o- BEEF BEND RD DURHAM RD' ' ° SI—T J '-i-7-{.. •.• El M3 1r••.I i The r r represented on th{. m' Tualatin River M4 •� 4.••••—••• 6 r t fFn rv2s,2o1o. 4 Crossin. : J Tto Tualatin Trail // d n amendments m. m #. I to Tualatin _5 0.25 0-, idler nthe content of the map. i. r t !---; !--,ms i..•..•• .._;r. Mlles DOWNTOWN 1 ] TAYLORS FERRY RD Figure 5-9 INSET �' L I• tion • ® i m� -. N w®�®`� ® I e _ Improvementsa m o /•'-- ♦ t x Tigard Urban \ , HO RG --jy .k._:d...... Planning Area 9 i m E 19�F• W O ' • © �p by ! SG SF i w / ?V )- ......- OAK`sr I. Existing Facilities NS4 eGR � / LL ERRY O uskoo• t: C' Major Roads hi3`). 11. I's' P :le e Ia u . .... 66a —Local Roads �• ...•� i 14' illizr-ii'e,- s' i�) ... / '•Multi-Use Path 27 . -FANNO CR PARK �' 1 , NORTH DAKOTA ST .:>e Future Facilities w 45 '.._..._..._..._.._..._..._..._..._.. .� ..� O a use PARK - intersection n y � ' _ramimr�____g • -Ti � � • � � HAINFS•ST 1 Project O , 4 - Roadway q t 0 t T 1 dd 1..,;•�. x# Pr ec z HCT Corridor WALNUT _ e�P BC '---- sl 0 DART:®H Sl UT Si - O) f, I 52 • Neiydlborhmd Path 54, , IEI Nroarxv¢w PARK - WALNUT ST 48_, ~ ' �- . �� Road Improvements s AK -- it,440,2' N 11 I,U = Road Improvement i <,yGr. INSET s NIIK Ott (includes pedestnnn t•e:. ,Y 't••I r n-I ., 25s* MI vN ! F' � and hike facilities) X ii IIW o •s' I s i p 0 Complete Streets ac Or• bike lanes) and s , '' 1 n ®r® 27 • I hike lanes) x 1..r '1 l '' l._.. i s ..„�, 4: 3� 8\ —Sidewalk o 1%...: 1b�k_.`i 74� �� 'f�• Jill- VP ii ♦.% Bike Lane „4„,.., iiiiiir; --- __,--0, _'`...1 <--j/y 'I C.� C -- ..`ii .11\ & \ `` j Bike Boulevard O s i .-.` _� Q WAL ST �• S Neo Facthnes S''q,l-�;i if., 3.t...D.. Yt_-........._..., I„t • GAARDE ST pG , MCDONALD ST �4,4 ••• New Road p i i 1.1 „,...J _- `66k m ©i•i �., (includes pedestrian .n. ••• Multiand -Use Path facilities, r••• �� J. j �• See Figure 5-12 BULL MOUNTAIN RD ONI A R. /• for 2017 updates ®B T • ) ..,- t••..r -, :C3 _ Other Map Elements wl . .r 25 �. 7--ii w to Tigard Triangle w I � o Planned C Transit Center i to r "'i 66m + e TC i. , 1 7 AN 'J Improvements ••••Tigard City Bound z rte._I U g a o - ` ENNIS -�I t�T m A�ig g Nip IL a paler i Parks gin. OIiir N 7 IWO. I L '--BEEF BEND RD 66n �� •DURHAM�RDillY .-- Ill 1 Q4p10 _.r- J �, 'ice F Q�e s50 17El •. 5: • ' Ti infnrmntwn represented nn this TOrpuin Trail p current as ofFebmary 28.2010 • • to Tualatin , p•2` r K will be made NEAR-TERM PROJECTS _I // d snntenl<ndmfnt.n<.a'mmap decisions or am r.�.�: M I� the �•t the map. E I =DOWNTOWN 0 1 , ..0. TAYLORS FERRY RD \ Figure-- 10 INSET CO '' E .�^-.1 1 1 m� w N 1•▪ vc � Transportation G M2 M6} 1 • ,_ ' __ �, _ L. Improvements i. / /•b, I t yy t ckV 2 .-_ S Tigard Urban : ^;. ♦ ' .o S co ,Gy•• a Bao .:. ai Planning Area ♦ P10 n If r c�'C OL f I Riv L• _ q t1 p.\� Ryyq .� 64 SCROLL FE ,�•.°°° F':Q 58 Oirig AK ST t I... Existing MajorFacies 66a PC7 t 1 to %�a 1m J ® •+ m ! PIN- Roads j . > ♦ a `: m W....1I 1 ' 66d .---Local Roads . 8 Bj 1 ~ u ,�,' sits..^ / q I, . ry is • 217 -w ^^Multi-Use Path r > 1 • 27 ■m FANNO CR PARK / 1 w ® .Y P1 NORTH DAKOTA ST ml® _ 45 1 Future Fatalities '� ..� �O a r--h sv..,• se PARK Mi _ ® ♦u.7 ® i #4 Intersection Project 2 • j HAINFS ST 4F O� M "[ P76— --� OE� �� ® ....o •(so pu Roadway Project _. r, o 1 ,', 2 `♦'"•'t •�-•••- ■ I HCT Corridor 0 \ +..• SSP -C4 I � 0 DARTMOUTH 5511 Fi '6 WALNUT - rc'• � ® '*'• Neighborhood Path 57� - � O •C6 � _ 54 4. . g R9it r ^ i� 52 / < 1Y Rq �' S �C7 It wonrmnew vans U7 5T m -.- -.Y Road Improvement. ? r""••" _ , JACKRs WAl•N �Yq 'to.. DOWNTOWN 11110 x Road ImPprrovemenl `, --i <ayGr �. INSET) NI/kf (include. estron r1 IS °t^' > `" SA, ��.�ST ® (adds Pidewalk e6) 1and Inke a i Y ' of 1 1 _.... f': `� k lanes) a and _ J 1 r. i 27 t : 6.. M1I ro anes N O Streets r . _ i ' EN ' ID.t.. ..]Q.♦r gviiiiiiiiits Sidewalk riro .. ^ M6�% i l pZa a � ...i _ �_ —r ]-0 0 ♦ Bike ane i,:' • - < ♦i♦• Bike Boulevard P ROSY ;Anil _ I• Q WA LST 4% ' New Facilities L Y. 1S'' I `ST m MCDONALD ST O ®� ••• N .' _ ! 66k 0 �i �� New Road • n 1 > ♦ (includespedestrian O r-` •••.-. ; ,�, 4.1 GAARDE I ®/ _.,624 ■onrrt�♦T d hike facilities) 1 t.♦• ,,"�e,e, �I Y � Ap See Figure 5-12 ••* Multi-Use Path BULL MOUNTAIN RD „ a — _-._ - BONITA RD l r { P6 B2s Bca 361,1 for 2017 updates - — 1 — / -27 P., Ear' 13.i. > to Tigard Triangle ._j4k' w �� '^•••^" 66m lrTA a{a - - .� o a Planned Omer Map Elements •; ' w.:; r 3 -o Improvements N `/ ` * ` 1 1 B :-„ i..,L ® w r d - TC Transit Center L. •.__). 1r s ; : y •• ` _ L.. ® ','�o vwi ....Tigard City Bounden ism )0 y... i / -� �,, 11 w,w,.xsw.-I • r •DURHAMRD `� E_10 BEEF BEND RD ® ®._ 7 11 1-41 1 • L. �- --L- ,J 1 IA..m ... .1.�� JQ El g. • I Tualatin River M4 i" ern i♦ The information ie d on rho presrn e ■ // o,r as of February 214.2010 ■'' + Crossing ■ Tonquin Trail P" rY �� er Rn will be mad as new Io Tualatin �_5 decloons or amendments occur to alter NEAR& MID-TERM PROJECTS .% a. •--• ""' Iko orre^' ol the ^'^r r - — ate. DOWNTOWN 0 L 1 TAYLORS FERRY RD Figure 5-11 INSET i ®/ z89 s ' 1 , •.. ®. 00 w ! r N "'Ms i Transportation . "�Mz} �eC B �j o B Improvements t Z� �. '. Piot ve.. 174... , TigazdUrban ' �A9 `. PG :C: • _ - 8 .i..�a.._ - r . PlannmgArea am S I ' eL'P ® l 1 OLL RRY RDN $0.• r., ®* ,1 ` ® B30El r �`P �• 2y e•orew000, r,F • • 7 SCH SFE •w 5® OAK ST i ` Existing Facilities 6Gi PCI N2iS,, S j �l".+�1 �a O (� J' m ,# PIN. . ! Major Roads •ve �. On ¢ N -..... - Local Roads 6.5 • la •• ' -- 2 g • I D Id w 1 """Multi-Use Path 27 w w FANNo CR PARK a 1 1 ' d�, ^_ --_.1 NORTH DAKOTA ST m® ¢ Future Facilities • m 53 12—denalli— • �� x �� 7 „ �®P' r � �� I� 660, �,i HAINFS ST ## Intersection Project s - M _,� I .. ,p116+ P2.��o®` ®# ...eZ 9 co ## Roadway Project � o � B at CA ._, M s t- P N - a e �ta I HCT Corridor • DARTMOUTH• OUSI 11 T WALNUT ST- .-_ �O.�,. •�' Irc i '''Iii r ��® 52 51/ ` ^••• Neighborhood Path II 54� WALNUT STr K. SRI• 44.�� '�-' Y Road Improvements .o.TNarewv arc -. } NN�kq< ' DOWNTOWN, 17�'G - __. _ —Road Improvement !. r NG I INSET NIS e n tand pedestrian I'. L ��,t---- S 8713114° ! kF' ® d bike facilities) cc r - / • ©'. j Complete Streets a 1P■ __ .. 2T 1 - (eddy sidewalks and 66I Ng., _ / /J,J} _ ! s , 1 bake lanes) o i.._..: / ` � r_'. _.,'✓ ... � ®:.. %\..... �* 3P +8+'\ ® 5 Sidewalk ,., • ®� r.a ,...® �� &ke Lane e 1111 M5 / -0 4 ' v _® '�,P. t.�.' - 217 Bike Boulevard ^f+1 �- ` �► ' �• ROSY ,.••t L , F' GAARDELI --7-- Q _ _. WAIL ST �t.�•• ` '�I Dery Facilitk. ••• •••' y `- ST - MCDONALD ST, �i �� New Road 00 it `66k m 'C3 _ u... •• a • / _ ♦ • (includes pedestrian I '` �_ _- , ® � -® and bike facilities) -- �-_ 1 C©s �° y— See Figure 5-12 •• Mnln-Use Path gl 678 T ...._� ,� •' �, \ /• 625 �rv,.'.�.' i V BONITA RD ahl BULL MOUNTAIN RD cm �..• l m - it •.-� BC3 •• 2017 updates Other Map Elements for Mil — / t PZT w w Ito Tigard Triangle 111 ' ®e,� r' - o a Planned tonsil Center ClT m { � 11,.L ; o ® .: ! � < _ Improvements ....Tigard City Boundary N --� ter ♦ 1.. ill _) iVimmimp ® , _ CF.m .. Ell o: w l O Parks 7-1:: , O - ---i ' , :- ._ _ �,. :T BEEF BEND RD -�-y.-W; •DURHAM RDT ®, �yQF��0 °',rap- ga © I ® I,,. � 39 i _..t -"t, '� Ila •�50 1 .n II El M3] ®O♦♦-- 1 '1Tualatin River= 00000000 '•. !.-.,.-... 5 II '•The infermnhun rcpresenmd on this Cro55i MA r // map is current as of February 28,2015 n9 .S r Tonquin Trail a aex, / s; to Tualatin 0 0.125 0.25 0 5 Rea ons will be made a ALL PROJECTS i deaaio onnen end menta the map to alter M Mile, the t t or the map. ' Figure 5-12 i, —-- - -- _� ---I -___Li, � "` 66e Tigard Triangle i I ,L t N Planned Improvements i �3 .\ Tigard Urban 1 ! f Planning Area 66f �I / Existing and Planned Facilities* Existing Street t PFAFFLE 660 =i� M1O F.� -.._._..\ '\ ——s Planned Street o1 �9 /7I Existing Trail i /66g i - 1-- 50 ATLANTA 3 Planned Trail __M BAYLOR Future Path • \._ 66c j I 1 — Bike Lane(Both Sides) 66b O b I `o I Bike Lane(East Side) C N CLINTON 1 Planned Intersection --— I (Locationlllustrativc) 11( ...... n j 1 38 •• _— 1 Planned improvements j tsP • 01. O Intersection Project COT •• ELMHURST 'Oi,, ••• �-.• ' ii Street Project s 217 ..�,•HERMOSO Q Trail Project c��'' FRANKLIN P _TSM3 � i M • BEVELAND `; � .�'� L n/ = L•.. • Sr Tigard Cit?Boundary N /M11\ �� HU I GONZAGA I I P �GR'1y `74F,pt HAMPTON I R4 II II ——— I 'All existing streets should include pedetrian and bicycle facilities consistent with adopted standards, P ,� '1 but main gaps exist.Facilitygaps are not shown on this map but should bcaddressed at the time of developmentor through the city's capital improvement program. f This mep is provided for illuslralivc _._Jt purposes.The complete list of - projects is provided in Table 5-(,. 71.- , , , �, Ttr.n xn 80 0.125 0.25 0.5 ""The information represented on this map is 4111111 5 current as of October 2,2017.Revisions will be made as new decisions or amendments occur Miles t, to alter the content of the map. i Exhibit C.1 Chapter 18.650 TIGARD DOWNTOWN PLAN DISTRICT 18.650.070 Building and Site Design Standards 4. Weather protection. b. Awnings/marquees/canopies may shall project a minimum of 3 feet and a maximum of 6 feet from the facade and may project a maximum of 4 6 feet into the public right-of-way).or the minimum sidewalk width along the building frontage, whichever is less. Any element that projects into the right-of-way is subject to approval by the city engineer. c. Marquees The element shall have a minimum 10-foot clearance from the bottom of the element marquee to the sidewalk. Awnings and canopies shall have a minimum 8-foot clearance front the bottom of the awning or canopy to the sidewalk. 18.650.120 Signs Signs in the MU-CBD zone are subject to the standards and procedures in Chapter 18.435, Signs and shall utilize the MU-CBD zone sign standards in Subsection 18.435.130.H. A. S'gn standards. In addition to the requirements of Chapter 18.435, Signs, the following standards shall be met: . •• --. L •- 2. The maximum sign area limits are: a. Freestanding signs shall not exceed 70 square feet per sign face or a total of 1'10 square feet for all sign faces. b. Wall signs shall not exceed in gross area 15 percent of any building face on which the sign is mounted. c. All other signs area requirements shall comply with Section 18./135.130.C. 3. The maximum height limit for all signs except wall signs shall be 20 feet. landscape areas. 5. Blade signs are permitted as follows: _ ... parapets)placed at each entrance to a building is allowed. Tigard Downtown Plan District 18.650-XX Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.1 square feet. • - .. : ' -- •- . • right of way with a 10 foot clearance of the right of way. 7. Pedestrian oriented roof/awning signs are permitted as follows: the upper surface of the awning structure or the roof line. .- . .. . - - - . .. - . e .. ! ! Tigard Downtown Plan District 18.650 XX Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.1 Chapter 18.660 TIGARD TRIANGLE PLAN DISTRICT 18.660.020 Applicability A. Applicability. 3. Public rights-of-way. The standards in Section 18.660.090 apply to all existing, future, and proposed-public rights-of-way in the Tigard Triangle Plan District regardless of the zone. 4. The boundary of the Tigard Triangle Plan District is shown on Map 18.660.A. The TMU zone and C-G zone are also shown on this map and the official zoning map. All cxisting and future transportation Transportation facilities are shown on Map 18.660.B. 18.660.040 Review Process C. Land use review. 4. Adjustment application. An adjustment application shall be processed through a Type II procedure as provided in Section 18.710.060. b. An adjustment application shall be approved when all of the following approval criteria have been met for each requested adjustment: iv. The proposed adjustment is needed to address transportation network connectivity standards and includes, where practicable, pedestrian, bicycle, or vehicle transportation facilities. Transportation network connectivity standards are provided in Subsection 18.660.090.C.3. v iv-.—The proposed adjustment is for the removal of a district tree, and the applicant will pay the district tree removal fee listed in the city's Master Fees and Charges Schedule unless a finding is made that the proposed development site cannot be reasonably developed without removal of the district tree. District tree information and requirements are provided in Subsection 18.660.070.H. 18.660.050 Pre-Existing Development and Approvals C. Sites with pre-existing land uses. 1. A pre-existing land use that does not meet the land use standards in Section 18.660.060 may continue but shall not expand beyond the boundaries of the site that it occupied prior to the effective date of this chapter, except for any pre-existing land uses within the area bounded by 666 Avenue and 686 Avenue to the east and west and Dartmouth Street and Franklin Street to the north and south, respectively. Any pre-existing land uses within this area that do not meet the land use standards in Section 18.660.060 may continue and expand beyond the boundaries of the site that it occupied prior to the effective date of this chapter, but not beyond the boundaries of the area described above. 18.660.080 Building Design Standards D. Building projections.Building projections are allowed as follows: Tigard Triangle Plan District 18.660 XX Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.1 Figure 18.660.3 Building Projection Standards Building Projection Standards • 1'max.projection into minimum building setback • 4'max.projection into public right-of-way 6-- 3'min.depth for required weather protection and 6'max.projection into public right-of-way T 8'min.vertical clearance < Min. vertical clearance changed from 10' to 8' with addition of 6' max. projection into the public right-of-way. Private property Public right-of-way 2. Balconies or weather protection for pedestrians along building facades may project into the minimum building setback and public right-of-way as shown in Figure 18.660.3 above. Elements in the right of way shall Balconies may project a maximum of 4 feet an4 into the right- of-way. Balconies that project into the right-of-way shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 10 feet from sidewalk grade and are subject to approval by the city engineer. as shown in Figure 18.660.3 above. 3. Weather protection elements for pedestrians along building facades, such as canopies or awnings, may project into the minimum building setback and public right-of-way as shown in Figure 18.660.3 above. Weather protection elements may project into the right-of-way a maximum of 6 feet or the minimum sidewalk width along the building frontage, whichever is less. Elements that project into the right-of-way shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 8 feet from sidewalk grade and are subject to approval by the city engineer. 34. Signs may project into the minimum building setback and public right-of-way subject to the standards in .. - , Subsection 18.435.130.H.1.c and approval by the city engineer. Tigard Triangle Plan District 18.660-XX Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.1 18.660.090 Transportation Facility Standards C. Transportation facility standards. 1. General standards. a. All transportation and associated utility improvements to be placed in a public right-of-way or public access easement shall: i. Except as expressly provided in this Subsection 18.660.090.0, meet the Mem standards of the city as provided in the Public Works Design Manual and Chapter 18.910, Improvement Standards; including but not limited to location, grade, width, provided in this chapter,Chaptcr 18.910, and the Public Works Dcsign Manual;and 2. Intersection design and spacing. c. New street intersections, including alleys, not shown on Map 18.660.B Transportation Network Map are subject to approval by the city engineer and require an access report. The city engineer shall specify the technical information that must be included in the report. At a minimum, the access report shall show that the proposed street intersection meets stacking, sight distance, and deceleration standards provided in the Public Works Design Manual or the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO)publications, or other standards as determined by the applicable road authority. Street intersections are subject to the spacing standards in Table 18.660.9 below as measured between the centerlines of streets. Ta ile 69.9 Minimum Distance Between Stree Street 7,.t., ..t;.,,.s -• '. -. 600 feet DartmouthStreet 200 feet All Other Street:, 125 feet d. Clear vision standards in Chapter 18.930, Vision Clearance Areas, and street spacing standards in Chapter 18.910,Improvement Standards, do not apply to street intersections in the TMU zone. 3. Transportation network connectivity. a. Transpertatien Minimum required transportation improvements chall conform to are shown on Map 18.660.B Transportation Network Map.Additional transportation improvements for network connectivity may be required by Subsections 3.b. and 3.c below. Alleys are Tigard Triangle Plan District 18.660-XX Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.1 encouraged but not required. Private streets are prohibited. b. Block perimeters shall be 2,000 2,500 feet or less in length as measured along the centerlines of streets, unless:. If this standard cannot be met due to topographical constraints, protected natural resource areas, or existing development patterns, a bicycle and pedestrian connection shall be required by Subsection 3.c.i below. i. It is not practicable to construct a street due to topographical constraints, protected natural resource areas, or existing development patterns, and the applicant has submitted an Adjustment application as provided in Subsection 18.660.040.C4 and obtained the necessary land use approval;or ii. A future street, path, or trail on Map 18.660.B Transportation Network Map provides for a possible future connection that is feasible at the time of the proposed development and meets the block perimeter standard when included as part of the block perimeter measurement. c. Bicycle and pedestrian connections include off street trails and paths as defined in Subsection • . t•e Bicycle and pedestrian connections are required where the addition of a connection would link the end of a permanent turnaround to an adjacent street or provide a midblock connection through a long block. A midblock connection is required where at least one block face is 800 feet or more in length. A required connection must go through the interior of the block and connect the block face that is 800 feet or more in length to its opposite block face. Bicycle and pedestrian connections include off-street trails and paths as described in Subsection 18.660.090.C.4.d. pedestrian connection shall be provided every 330 feet or less. face that exceeds 800 feet or would link-the end of a turnaround to an adjacent street. 4. Transportation facility design. a. Street design. All streets are subject to the design standards in Table 18.660.10 18.660.9 below and as shown in Figure 18.660.5, except for Dartmouth Street, 72"d Avenue, and Pacific Highway, which and the future business access street parallel to Pacific Highway that connects the western portion of Atlanta Street to the future 74`h, Avenue. Dartmouth Street, 72nd Avenue, and Pacific Highway are subject to the design standards in Chapter 18.910,Improvement Standards.Subsection 18.910.030.E. The future business access street is subject to the standards in Subsection 18.910.030.E, specifically the local street standard shown in Figure 18.910.6.A. Table 18.660.4--9 Street Elements and Widths Street Element Width Notes Tigard Triangle Plan District 18.660-XX Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.1 d. Pedestrian facilities. iv. Sidewalks shall have a minimum unobstructed width of 6 feet for pedestrian through- travel, except for A-frame suns where the minimum unobstructed width is 4 feet. Any permanent structures or utilities within the required through-travel area are subject to approval by the city engineer. Any sidewalk area outside of the required through-travel area may be used for commercial purposes by adjacent development or may contain pedestrian amenities, such as street furniture, bicycle parking, trash cans, and drinking fountains. Use of this area for commercial purposes includes, but is not limited to: customer seating, merchandise display, and A-frame signs signage. Use of this area for commercial purposes is at the sole discretion of the director. A-frame signs are also subject to the standards and procedures in Chapter 18.435,Signs 18.660.100 Sign Standards Signs in the TMU zone are subject to the standards and procedures in Chapter 18.435, Signs and shall utilize the MU CBD TMU zone sign standards in Subsection 18.135.130.0 18.435.130.H. Tigard Triangle Plan District 18.660-XX Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.1 Map 18.660.B Tigard Triangle Transportation Network _ ..o•. (r3s.,,i,r,,,.3ip.dam; ali Tigard Triangle II iu niii 11m ■■_ id= n Transportation Network Ma • ' zi i 1 Future street intersection locations —1 and future street,path,and trail N. .�� dl ■ y alignments are illustrative.All future II. •••• _7 transportation facilities are subject ■w Business access street added .-_A9 to change based on development ■ : t�� •. . 44 _m review.final design,engineering 1 l) (am . •• „� and permitting by the applicable . i 1 i . %. , _ill U r approval authority. ; ` ' PC'\FNo i ■ * \ tills: t r.IL. Ai rj Ak tik4 . ,,.f'. i • I e lilt dk , VIP _jj( ! otri,,, 1r, ... 1 ) • 1.• i" .•••' Future path alignment �� 111 yS7 11611 I IIIIII, mu changed to provide a _� more direct connection "! rIILIH-7-7— ■ i v / between 72nd Ave and f • • • s r to 1 74 Ave ••. 1 Wiilr �� ' - C' I .. : _ N PzizzZ •• "^ fa is a ii .2,,iik�t • ~ ■ v6, sum ■ /��R Ra111111\ • �' •- Allivkik inH _ ,._, . Transportation Facilities 1111 2-...i _: • • j ......... Existing Street „ ab, •••me• Future Street 111111111011111 ,l Future Path ExistingTrail , I i l'—' NI Future TrailFiL.---,5Th { }— •• --- Bike Lane (Both Sides) Oji I ( •• ----- Bike Lane (East Side) I3 1 -ri • • Alleys(Encouraged) Inv • 1 n Tigard Triangle Plan Distrix - I Tigard Triangle Plan District 18.660-XX Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.1 Chapter 18.435 SIGNS 18.435.010 Purpose 18.435.012 Effective Date of this Chapter 18.435.015 Definitions 18.435.020 Permits circ 18.435.030 Approval Process 18.435.040 Approval Period 18.435.050 Inspections 18.435.060 Permit Exemptions Sims 18.435.070 Prohibited Signs 18.435.080 Sign Illumination 18.435.085 Sign Measurement 18.435.090 Special Condition Signs 18.435.100 Temporary Signs 18.435.110 Nonconforming Signs 18.435.120 Removal of Nonconforming and Abandoned Signs 18.435.130 Base Zone Regulations 18.435.140 Sign Code Adjustments 18.435.010 Purpose A. General purposes.The purposes of this chapter are: 1. To protect the health,safety,property and welfare of the public; 2. To promote the neat,clean,orderly and attractive appearance of the community; 3. To accommodate the need of sign users while avoiding nuisances to nearby properties; 4. To ensure for safe construction,location,erection and maintenance of signs; 5. To prevent proliferation of signs and sign clutter;and 6. To minimize distractions for motorists on public highways and streets 2: 7. To regulate solely on the basis of time,place and manner of a sign,not on its content:;and 8. ;,. ... .•, ' •- -. .. .. - - . . - To regulate the design, quality of materials, construction, location, electrification,illumination and maintenance of all signs visible from public property or from public rights-of-way. B_&-Compliance with other laws and regulations. It is not the purpose of this chapter to permit the erection or maintenance of any sign at any place or in any manner unlawful under any other ordinance, or state or federal law. (Ord. 04-03) 18.435.012 Effective Date of this Chapter All references made in this chapter to the effective date of this chapter shall mean November 9, 1983, unless otherwise specifically stated in an ordinance revision. Signs 18.435-1 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.1 18.435.015 Definitions A. Definitions. These definitions are specific to this chapter and are in addition to Chapter 18.30, Definitions. 1. "`A' frame A-frame sign" Any double face temporary rigid sign. -See "Temporary sign." 2. "Abandoned sign" - A structure not containing a message or image for 90 continuous days or a sign not in use for 90 continuous days. 3. "Area"- See Section 18.435.085 for definition of sign area. 4. "Awning sign"-A wall sign incorporated into or attached to an awning. 5. "Balloon"- See"Temporary sign." 6. "Banner"-See"Temporary sign." 7. "Bench sign"-A bench designed to seat people with a sign painted or affixed on the surface. 8. "Billboard" - A freestanding sign in excess of the maximum size allowed, with adjustments, in the locations where it is located or proposed to be located. 9. `Building face" - All street-facing wall areas in one or more parallel planes, including windows and building projections. 10. 9—"Cultural institution auxiliary sign" - A sign placed and maintained by, or on behalf of, a subordinate commercial use in a cultural institution. 11. 49-"Cutout" - Letters, figures, characters and/or representations in cutout or irregular form attached to or superimposed upon a sign. 12. 41--"Directional sign"-A permanent sign that is designed and erected solely for the purpose of traffic or pedestrian direction. 13. -lam"Display surface" - The area made available by the sign structure for the purpose of displaying the message or image. 14. 4-3—"Electrical sign"-Any sign utilizing electrical wiring. 15. -14--"Electronic information sign" - A sign, - : - .. - : with lighted changeable copy or message lighted messages that changes at int set intervals, each lasting more than two seconds, by electronic process or remote control. Electronic inf f ation signs arc not identified as rotating, revolving or moving signs. Also This type of sign is also known as an automatic changeable copy sign or electronic variable message center.An electronic information sign is not a reader-board sign or a rotating, revolving or moving sign. 16. 43—"Entryway sign" -A sign placed by or on behalf of the city at an entry to the city. 16. "Face of a building" means all windows and wall areas of a building in one or more parallel Signs 18.435-2 Code Update:2017 Exhibit CA 17. "Flashing sign" - Any sign that is illuminated by an intermittent or sequential flashing light source with an whose interval cycle that is 2 seconds or less in duration, or is animated in any other way animated so as to create the illusion of movement without actual physical movement or the illusion of a flashing or intermittent light or light source. 18. "Flush pitched roof sign" -A type of wall sign attached to a mansard or similar type of vertically aligned roof. 19. "Freestanding sign" - A sign erected and mounted on a freestanding frame, mast or pole and not attached to any building. 20. "Freeway interchange" - Any intersection of an exit off-ramp of Interstate Highway 5 or State Highway 217 with a Gurface da street. 21. "Freeway-oriented sign" - A sign primarily designed to be read by a motorist traveling on a highway designated by the Oregon State Highway Department as a freeway or expressway; specifically, these shall be Interstate 5 and Oregon State Highway 217, and shall not include Highway 99W. 22. "Immediate or serious danger": a. Whenever any portion of the structure is damaged by fire, earthquake, wind, flood or other cause, and any member or appurtenance is likely to fail,become detached or dislodged, or to collapse and thereby injure persons or damage property; b. Whenever any portion of the structure is not of sufficient strength or stability or is not so anchored, attached or fastened in place as to be capable of resisting a wind pressure of 0.5 of that specified in the state building code for this type structure or similar structure,and will not exceed the working stresses permitted in the state building code for such structures;or c. Whenever the location of the sign structure obstructs the view of motorists traveling on the public streets or private property, and thus causes damage to property or thereby injures persons. 23. "Industrial park" - A parcel of land which complies with the requirements in Chapter 18.130, Industrial Zones. 24. "Lawn sign" - See"Temporary sign." 25. "Lighting methods"- a. Direct lighting is where the light source is plainly visible on the sign face and not concealed within or separate from the sign.Examples include neon tube lighting and light- emitting diodes on an electronic information sign; ` • - .. - on the sign face; bb. c. Indirect or external Indirect or external lighting is where the light source is separate from the sign face or cabinet and is directed so 33 designed to shine on the sign;and Signs 18.435-3 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.1 cd. Internal Internal lighting is where the light source is concealed within the sign face or cabinet and is designed to illuminate the sign from within. 26. "Maintenance" -Normal care needed to keep a sign functional such as cleaning, oiling,changing and repair of light bulbs and sign faces. Does not include structural alteration. 27. "Nonconforming sign" - A sign or sign structure lawfully erected and properly maintained that would not be allowed under the sign regulations presently applicable to the site. 28. "Non-structural trim" - The moldings, battens, caps, nailing strips and latticing, letters and walkways that are attached to a sign structure. 29. "Painted wall decorations" - Displays painted directly on a wall, designed and intended as a decorative or ornamental feature.Decorations may also include lighting. 30. "Painted wall highlights" - Painted areas that highlight a building's architectural or structural features. 31. "Painted wall sign"-A sign applied to a building wall with paint and that has no sign structure. 32. "Premises" - One or more lots on which buildings or site improvements may exist that are . • . - . . ..' . . . ... ..' . • designed as a unit. 33. "Projecting sign" - A sign attached to a building other than a wall sign in which the sign face is . •:, - . . • • .• • • - •• .. ..- ., or any portion of a sign, attached to a building that is not parallel to the building face or that projects more than 18 inches from the wall plane of the building face. A projecting sign may be attached to a wall or a building projection, such as a marquee, balcony, or awning; however, the amount of the projection shall be measured from the wall plane in all cases and not the building projection to which the sign may be attached. A projecting sign shall not extend above the building face to which it is attached, except where there is an existing parapet. 34. "Reader-board sign" - Any sign with changeable copy or a-message that is changed manually not electronically.,except A reader-board sign is not an electronic information signs. 35. "Roof line" - The top edge of a roof or building parapet, whichever is higher, excluding any cupolas,chimneys or other minor projections. 36. "Roof sign" - A sign erected fully upon or directly above a roof line or parapet of a building or structure. Exceptions: include approved temporary balloons, signs attached to existing architectural features and flush mounted"roof'signs. 37. "Rotating, revolving or moving sign" - Any sign, or portion of a sign, which that moves in any manner, including but not limited to movement caused by wind,machines, or persons. 38. "Shopping center"-Developments A development of not less than 8 business units. 39. "Shopping plaza"-Developments A development of between 2 and 7 business units. Signs 18.435-4 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.1 40. "Sign" - Materials placed or constructed primarily to convey a message with symbols, logos, letters, or other displays and that can be viewed from a the public right-of-way, another property,, or freak the air. 41. "Sign Projection"-The distance by which a projecting sign extends from a building. 42. "Sign structure" -Any structure that supports or is capable of supporting any sign as described in the state building code. A sign structure may be a single pole and may or may not be an integral part of a building. Sign structures are not buildings. 43. "Structural alteration" - Modification of the size, shape or height of a sign structure. Also includes replacement of sign structure materials with other than comparable materials, for example metal parts replacing wood parts. 44. 4-- -"Temporary sign" - Any sign, .. , . : . .. .. • that is not permanently erected or permanently affixed to the around or any Gign structure, sign towcr,the ground or a or building: a. ?. .. - ° . .. -, • . . .. : A balloon sign is an inflatable, stationary sign anchored by some means to a structure or the ground. Includes Examples include simple children's balloons,hot and cold air balloons,blimps and other dirigibles; b. Banner A banner is a sign made of fabric or other nonrigid material with no enclosing framework; c. _. 1 - .. . :• . . . . - . .. - A lawn sign is a rigid sign supported by one or more sticks,posts,or rods inserted into the ground or a weighted base; or, or A requirements provided the size requirements in Section 18.135.060 can be met. A lawn sign in commercial or industrial zones is subject to temporary .,ign permit requirements as provided in Section 18.135.100. d. An A-frame sign is a freestanding sign with two possible sign faces supported br a rigid frame in the shape of an "A." 45. 48-"Wall sign" - Any sign attached to, painted on, or erected against or painted on the wall plane of a building face or structure with the exposed face of the sign in a plane parallel to the building face and that projects 18 inches or less from the p wall plane of the building Lass. 46. "Window sign" -A sign placed on the inside of a window. A sign placed on the outside of a window is considered a wall sign. 18.435.020 Permits wed A. Compliance with regulations. No sign or sign structure shall hereafter be erected, re-erected, constructed, structurally altered=or relocated within the city limits except as provided by this chapter.; Signs 18.435-5 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.1 B. Separate permits for each sign. A separate permit shall be required for each new sign or signs, modification of signs, or to legalize signs for each business entity. A separate permit shall be required for each group of signs on a single supporting structure. B. Sign permits. 1. All permanent signs shall require a sign permit, except those that are exempted by Section 18.435.060. All temporary signs shall require a temporary sign permit as provided by Section 18.435.100, except those that are exempted by Section 18.435.060. A-frame signs allowed by Subsection 18.435.130.H.6 shall be treated as permanent signs for permitting purposes. 2. Each sign or group of signs on a single supporting structure, including sign alterations not exempted by Section 18.435.060,shall require a separate sign permit. 3. All sign permits shall be reviewed through the approval process provided in Section 18.435.030 below. C. Compliance with state building-code. Separate structural permits under the state building code shall also apply.Building permits.All signs are subject to the provisions of the state building code where applicable.A building permit may be required. •- - . •• . . •.•- . -- : - - - - . .. . Electrical permits. All signs are subject to the provisions of the state electrical code where applicable.An electrical permit shall be required for all illuminated signs. E. Retroactive sign permits. The director may require application for sign permits for all signage at a given address if no existing permits previously had been approved or documented.(Ord.09-13) 18.435.030 Approval Process A. Approval process. Permits for new signs,modification-of existing,igns,or to legalize signs for which . : .. :• -- ' :,Sign permits, including temporary sign permits, shall be processed through a Type I procedure, as provided in Section 18.710.050, using the requirements of this chapter as approval criteria. 18.435.040 Approval Period A. Approval period. Sign permit approval shall be effective for a period of 90 days from the date of approval. B. Lapse of approval.Te-sib Sign permit approval shall lapse if: 1. Substantial construction of the approved plan permit has not begun within the 90-day period;or 2. Construction on the site is a departure from the approved-art permit. C. Extension of approval. The director approval authority shall, upon written request by the applicant, grant an extension of the approval period not to exceed 90 days provided that: Signs 18.435-6 Code Update:2017 Exhibit CA I. No changes are made-on proposed to the original approved sign permit plan ; 2. The applicant can show intent of initiating construction of the sign within the 90-day extension period;and 3. There have been no changes in the applicable policies and ordinance provisions and state building code provisions on which the approval was based. 18.435.050 Inspections A. Construction inspection. General requirements for the inspection of signs during and following construction: 1. All construction work for which a permit is required shall be subject to an inspection by the building official in compliance with the state building code and this chapter: a. A survey of the lot or proposed location for sign erection may be required by the building official to verify compliance of the structure with approved plans; and b. Neither the building official nor the jurisdiction shall be liable for expense or other obligations entailed in the removal or replacement of any material required to allow inspection. B. Inspection requests. It shall be the duty of the person doing the work authorized by a permit to notify the building official that such work is ready for inspection. The building official may require that every request for inspection be filed at least 1 working day before such inspection is desired. C. Required interim inspections. 1. Reinforcing steel or structural framework of any part of the proposed structure shall not be covered or concealed without first obtaining approval of the building official; 2. Foundation inspections shall be made after all required excavations, form work and bolt settings are completed and ready to receive concrete; 3. All anchorages shall be left exposed for inspection; 4. Electrical inspection shall be made by the agency issuing electrical permits. D. Final inspections. Final inspection shall be called for by the applicant when all work is completed. This inspection shall cover all items required by the building official under state law or city ordinances such as the locations, landscaping if required, and general compliance with the approved plans and requirements of this title. E. Director's inspection. The director is authorized and directed to enforce all of the provisions of this chapter: 1. All signs for which permits are required shall be inspected by the director;and 2. Upon presentation of proper credentials, the director may enter at reasonable times any building, structure,or premises in the city to perform any duty imposed upon the position by this chapter. Signs 18.435-7 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.1 18.435.060 Permit Exemptiees Signs A. Exemptions from permit requirements. The following signs and operations s#e do not require a sign permit but shall conform to all other applicable regulations of this chapter and the provisions of requirements in Subsection B below of this section: 1. Lawn and A-frame signs in residential zones. , which do not exceed the maximum allowable arca on one premises regardless of the number of signs, as follows: a. Multiple lawn and A-frame signs are allowed per premises, b. The total maximum sign area for lawn signs in the R-1, R-2, R-3.5, R-4.5, and R-7 zones shall be 12 square feet per sign face and A total of 24 square feet in residential zones; for all sign faces per premises. The total maximum sign area for lawn signs in all other residential zones shall be 24 square feet for all sign faces per premises, c. b. A frame signs shall be no greater than 6 square feet per face in any residential zone. The total maximum sign area for A-frame signs in all residential zones shall be 6 square feet per sign face and 12 square feet for all sign faces. A-frame signs may be displayed only between the hours of 8 a.m. and 6 p.m., and Lawn signs shall not exceed 12 square feet per face in the R 1, R 2,R 3.5, R 1.5, and R 7 zones. d. Lawn and A-frame signs in residential zones shall be placed on private property and not within the public right-of-way nor shall such signs obstruct or the clear vision area as provided in Chapter 18.930, Vision Clearance Areasi. A frame signs are permitted only between the hours of 8 a.m. and 6 p.m.; 2. Signs not oriented or intended to be legible from a right-of-way,other property or€r-em the air; 3. Signs inside a building, except for strobe lights flashing signs visible from a right-of-way, other propertyz or the air; 4. Painted wall decorations; 5. Painted wall highlights; 6. Window signs; Signs affected by stipulated judgments to which the city is a party, entered by courts of competent jurisdiction; 7. Directional signs on private property or directional signs in the public right-of-way that are legally erected by or on behalf of a government agency or road authority; 8. Interior window signs; Flags displayed from permanently located freestanding or wall-mounted flagpoles that are designed to allow the flags to be raised and lowered; 9. Sign repair, maintenance, or change of copy or message that does not involve a change of sign size, height, type, or location;and 10. Signs affected by stipulated judgments to which the city is a party that is entered by courts of competent jurisdiction. Signs 18.435-8 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.1 while on the parcel of real property on which the sit- . - . . ' . •_- - - -• - - • required for such signs; and property where such erection, construction or locatio• • . .• . . . •• • , •: otherwise permitted.No sign permit or fee shall be required for such signs. B. Requirements for exempted signs. All signs exempted from sign permits requirements in Subsection A above shall meet the following requirements: 1. The sign shall be erected All signs shall be placed on private property with the consent of the lawful possessor of the property owner. No sign shall and shall not be placed on utility poles or in the public right-of-way except where expressly allowed; and 2. Multiple signs shall be allowed per premises and be spaced at least 50 feet apart in residential zones and 30 feet apart in all other base zones. C. Nothing in this title shall prevent the erection,location, or construction of signs on private property where such erection, location, or construction is required by any law or ordinance. Nor shall any public agency or utility be prohibited from erecting signs on private property when otherwise authorized. No sign permit or fee shall be required for such si,ns. : •: . -- -- provisions of this section shall not apply to repair, maintenance or change of copy on the same sign for the use of chang able copy),or unlawfully erected er maintained signs. (Ord. 0I 02) 18.435.070 Certain Signs Prohibited Signs A. Prohibited display of flags and banxcrs-. It is a violation of this chapter to erect or maintain strings of , .. . -- , - .. _ , . - . • _ , • - . .. - , • • • • •. • • , •. , .. .. . . • . . .' . include: 1. National,state and institutional flags properly displayed; • P. • . ••• A_B—Unsafe sus or improperly maintained signs. No sign shall be constructed, erected,or maintained unless the sign and sign structure is so constructed, erected,and maintained as to be able to withstand the wind, seismic,artd or other applicable requirements as specified in the state building code or this title. B. . . • . •• - - •.- Unauthorized traffic signs. No sign shall be erected at intersections of any streets in such a manner as to materially obstruct free and clear vision. All signs shall be consistent with Chapter 18.930,Vision Clearance Areas of this title: Signs 18.435-9 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.1 1. No sign shall be erected at any location • •, . . . - :. • ': , .. . . : , that interferes with, obstructs the view of, or could be confused with any authorized traffic sign, signals or device by reason of position,shape,or color; and 2. No sign shall be erected that makes use of the word"stop," "look," "danger,"or any other similar word,phrase,symbol,or character in-such manner as is reasonably that is likely to interfere with, mislead,or confuse motorists. CO—Obscenity Obscene signs. No sign shall bear or contain statements, words, or pictures in which the dominant theme of the material, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest in sex or is patently offensive because it affronts the contemporary community standard relating to the description or representation of sexual material -. . - ' •.. . •_ . '. . . D. E. Traffic oObstructing signs. /. No sign or sign structure shall be constructed or located in such a manner or at such a location that it will that obstructs access to any fire escape or other means of ingress or egress from a building or any exit corridor,exit hallways or exit doorway.No sign or supporting sin structure shall cover, wholly or partially, any window or doorway in any manner that it will substantially limits access to the building in case of fire or other emergency;and. 2. No sign or sign structure shall be erected at any street intersection that obstructs clear vision as provided in Chapter 18.930, Vision Clearance Areas. F. Bare light bulbs. Strings of bare lights shall not be constructed, erected,or maintained within view of design. This subsection shall net apply to lighting displays as described in subsection A.2 of this ti, �vir E. 6,—Roof signs. Roof signs of any kind are prohibited,except for temporary balloon signs allowed by Section 18.435.100 and pedestrian-oriented roof signs allowed by Subsection 18.435.130.H. ; F. 4--Revolving, rotating, or moving signs. Revolving, rotating, or moving signs of any kind are prohibited, except for flags allowed by Subsection 18.435.060.A.6 or temporary banners or balloons allowed by Section 18.435.100. G j--Flashing signs. Flashing signs of any kind are prohibited, including but not limited to strobe lights. • • •. .• . . y. • --••• -• . .. - -- intensity, with each interval in the cycle lasting 2 seconds or less. Exposed reflective type bulbs, • -• • , - . . . . , . .. , _ -•• .. . - . . .• . . . .. J. Temporary signs with illumination or changeable copy. A sign not permanently erected or affixed to sign with changeable message characteristics. H. 1---Right-of-way signs. Signs in the public right-of-way in whole or in part are prohibited, except J signs legally erected for informational purposes by or on behalf of a government agency, bench signs allowed by Subsection 18.435.090.B, awning signs allowed by Subsection 18.435.090.E, temporary banners allowed by Section 18.435.100, or signs allowed by Subsection 18.435.130.H.1.c in the TMU and MU-CBD zones.Any sign that projects into or is located in City of Tigard right-of- Signs 18.435-10 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.1 way is subject to approval by the city engineer. No sign shall project into or be located in Oregon Department of Transportation right-of-way. L b—Signs on a vehicle. Any sign placed Signs placed on or painted on a motor vehicle or trailer, as defined by ORS Chapter 801, with the primary purpose of providing a sign not otherwise allowed for by this chapter are prohibited. J 144—Billboards.Billboards are prohibited.(Ord.09-13) 18.435.080 Sign Illumination A. Surface brightness. The surface brightness of any sign shall not exceed that produced by the diffused output obtained from 800 milliampere fluorescent light sources spaced not closer than 8 inches,center on center. B. No exposed incandescent lamps. Any exposed incandescent lamp that exceeds 25 watts shall not be used on the exterior surface of any sign so as to expose the face of such bulb or lamp to any public street or public right-of-way with the exception of electronic information signs. 18.435.085 Sign Measurement A. Projecting and freestanding signs. 1. The area of a freestanding or projecting sign shall include all sign faces counted in calculating its area.Regardless of the number of sign cabinets or sign faces,the total allowable area shall not be exceeded. 2. The area of the sign shall be measured as follows if the sign is composed of one or more a. The area around and enclosing the perimeter of each sign cabinet, sign face,or module shall be summed and then totaled to determine total area. The perimeter of measurable area shall not include embellishments such as pole covers, framing and decorative roofing, provided there is no written advertising copy,symbols or logos on such embellishments; b. If the sign is composed of more than two sign cabinets, faces, sign facia or modules,the area enclosing the entire perimeter of all cabinets, faces, armor modules within a single, continuous geometric figure shall be the area of the sign. Pole covers and other embellishments shall not be included in the area of the sign measurement if they do not bear written advertising copy,symbols or logos;and c. The overall height of a freestanding sign or sign structure is measured from the grade directly below the sign to the highest point of the sign or sign structure and shall include architectural and structural embellishments. B. Wall signs. 1. The area of the sign shall be measured as follows: a. The area around and enclosing the perimeter of each sign cabinet,sign facet or module shall be summed and then totaled to determine total area. The perimeter of measurable area shall Signs 18.435-11 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.1 not include embellishments such as pole covers, framing and decorative roofing, provided there is no written advertising copy,symbols or logos on such embellishments; b. If the sign is composed of individual letters or symbols using the wall as the background with or without added decoration, the total sign area shall be calculated by measuring the area within the perimeter of all symbols and letters or other decoration including logos; and c. Measurement of the wall area pertaining to flush pitched"roof' signs shall be calculated as if the sign were mounted directly on the wall face immediately below the sign_;—an4 include the vertical surface of the awning or canopy on which the sign is to be mounted and the wall surface of the structure to which it is attached. C. Awning Signs 1. If an awning sign meets the definition of a wall sign as provided in Subsection 18.435.015.A., it shall be measured as a wall sign as described in Subsection 18.435.085.B above as if the sign were mounted directly on the building face. 2. If an awning sign meets the definition of a projecting sign, it shall be measured as a projecting sign as described in Subsection 18.435.085.A above. 18.435.090 Special Condition Signs A. Applicability. Special condition Special condition signs shall have special or unique dimensional, locational, illumination, maximum number or other requirements imposed upon them in addition to the regulations contained in this chapter. B. Bench signs. 1. Bench signs shall only be permitted allowed at designated transit stops in commercial,industrial= and43e R-12,R-25,and R-40 zones where no bus shelter exists: a. There shall be no No more than 1 bench sign per-allowable shall be allowed per transit stop; b. Placement of the bench sign shall not interfere with pedestrian traffic or be located within a vision clearance area or a public right-of-way except where approved unless-otherwise by the city engineer; c. Application for a bench sign shall include the signature of the affected property owner,proof of liability insurance, and any required permits from the state highway division or Washington County,where applicable;and d. The sign area shall be limited to a total of 14 square feet. C. Balloons. ! .. .., only if all of the following conditions are met: Signs 18.435-12 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.1 a. A sign permit is obtained for ach single or cluster of balloons; c. A balloon sign shall be allowed to remain up for a p--:: : •. .• e :• -• ; calendar year; c. Balloons may be permitted as roof signs with a sign permit; g. The balloon shall be secured to a structure on the ground and shall not be allowed to float in the air higher than 25 feet above the nearest building roof line. C D. Electronic message centers.Electronic information signs. 1. Electronic message center (variable message) sign regulations shall be subject to all of the following restrictions: 1_a—Electronic message center information signs shall be pefmitted allowed only in the C-G, MUC, TMU, and MU-CBD zones, and at schools that front an arterial street where the sign is not less than 200 feet from an abutting residential use and is oriented to the arterial street. 2. The standards for electronic information signs in TMU and MU-CBD zones are provided in Subsection 18.435.130.H.1.a. 3. The standards for electronic information signs in all other zones and for schools are provided below. a. 13-.—The maximum height and area of an electronic message center information sign shall be as provided in Section 18.435.130 and any other applicable standards of this title b_e—Electronic message centers information signs shall may not be allowed to substituted for a nonconforming sign or mounted upon a nonconforming sign or sign structure, unless the sign and sign structure are brought into compliance with all of the provisions of this title c. 4E1 -An electronic message center information sign may shall be allowed to substitute for 1 freestanding sign or 1 wall sign except in the MUC zone where an electronic message center information sign may only be substituted for 1 freestanding sign and no other sign type. Electronic message centera An electronic information sign shall not be allowed to substituted for any other sign type . . . • • - •, and shall not be allowed to replace or supplement a billboard, freeway_oriented sign, or any other sign types other than those specifically allowed above..-i d. e-1 electronic imer age center information sign shall be allowed per premises;and e_f—With regard to light patterns: i. Traveling light patterns("chaser effect")shall be are prohibited;, and Signs 18.435-13 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.1 ii. Messages and animation shall be displayed at intervals of greater than two seconds in duration. D_E—Freestanding freeway-oriented signs. 1. For signs requiring a permit under the Oregon Motorist Information Act, the city will determine through a Type I procedure whether the sign meets all applicable city standards and provide that determination to any applicant for a state permit consistent with ORS 377.723. 2. Freeway-oriented signs shall only be allowed pied-enly in the C-G, TMU, I-P, I-L and I-H zones. 3. Freeway-oriented signs shall be permitted to be located within 200 feet of Highway 217 andor Interstate Freeway No. 5 rights-of-way. 4. 1 frees freeway-oriented sign shall be allowed per premises. 5. The maximum height of a freeway-oriented sign shall not exceed 35 feet from the ground level at its base. 6. -. -- . . . . . The maximum sign area of a freeway-oriented sign shall not exceed 160 square feet per face(or or 320 square feet for all faces. total"h all be all owed 7. Freeway-oriented signs shall be oriented to be viewed from the freeway. 8. In addition to a freeway-oriented sign, each parcel, development complex, or premises shall be allowed 1 freestanding sign provided all other provisions of this chapter can be met and both signs are located on separate frontages with different orientations. 9. Freeway-oriented signs are only allowed as freestanding signs and are not permitted allowed as any other sign type. .. , - : , - .. . , .. , . . . • _ -• . E. F,--Awning signs. 1. Awning signs shall be permitted allowed in all base zones.Regardless of how an awning sign is measured, as provided in Subsection 18.435 085.C, the total awning sign area counts toward the total wall sign area allowance as provided in the applicable base zone sign regulations in Section 18.435.130, except for awning signs in the TMU and MU-CBD zones. The total awning sign area in these zones counts toward the total projecting sign area allowance as provided in Subsection 18.435.130.H.4. 2. The standards for awning signs in TMU and MU-CBD zones are provided in Subsection 18.435.130.H.4. 3. The standards for awning signs in all other zones are provided below. a_2—The copy on awning signs may shall not extend above the upper surfaces of the awning structure. They may be hung below the awning if the sign clears the sidewalk by at least 8.5 feet; Signs 18.435-14 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.1 b_3---Awning signs may be internally or externally illuminated; and c_4—Where approved by the city engineer, awning Aweing signs may extend into the public right-of-way 6.5 feet or 2/3 of the distance to the roadway, whichever is less. However, no sign may shall extend within 2 feet of the roadway nearest vehicle travel lane. division approval shall be necessary for awning signs on state highways. F 6—Flush pitched"roof'signs. 1. Flush pitched roof signs shall be allowed in all base zones except residential zones; 2. The face of flush Flush pitched roof signs may shall not extend more than 6 inches above the roof line; 3. Flush pitched roof signs shall be parallel to the building face and shall . They may not extend beyond the sides of the building face wall. Such surfaces shall be considered part of a wall 4. Flush pitched roof Such signs shall only be attached to a mansard or other near vertical roof where the roof angle is greater than 45°from horizontal;and 5. Flush pitched roof signs are a type of wall sign, and all All code provisions applicable to wall signs shall also be applicable apply to this type of sign. G 14—Painted wall signs. Wall signs, including symbols or logos, which are painted directly onto the wall surface shall not exceed in gross wall area that the percentage nenu-ally allowed for a wall sign in that the applicable base zon-; . , -- . .•----••. . -- • . . . - . e . --- of the height of the wall. H. 1-.--Entryway signs. Entryway signs shall be permitted allowed in all base zones. I J. Cultural institution auxiliary signs. 1. Cultural institution auxiliary signs shall be permitted allowed in all base zones. 2. Cultural institution auxiliary signs are limited to 1 sign and shall be either within the same sign structure as another freestanding sign on the property where the cultural institution is located or on a wall of the primary building of the cultural institution. A wall sign shall be consistent in structure and materials with any existing wall sign on the cultural institution. The sign area of a cultural institution auxiliary sign shall not exceed 4 square feet per face. (Ord. 10-04 §1; Ord. 06- 13,Ord.06-09,Ord.04-03) 18.435.100 Temporary Signs A. App I process. Permits for temporary signs Fret exempted by Section 1-8.135.060 shall be .. ary sign as necessary to ensure discontinuance of the use of the sign in compliance with the terms of the authorization, and to ensure substantial compliance with the purpose of this chapter. Signs 18.435-15 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.1 A. Applicability. All temporary signs listed in Subsection 18.435.015.A.46 require a temporary sign permit except for the following: 1. Lawn and A-frame signs in residential zones exempted by Section 18.435.060. 2. A-frame signs in MU-CBD and TMU zones allowed by Subsection 18.435.130.H.6. B. Expiration. 1. A temporary sign permit shall be issued for a period of 30 days or less. The approval authority may attach conditions to the permit as necessary to ensure discontinuance of the use of the sign terminate within 30 days from the date of issuance; and 2. No permit shall be issued for a period longer than 30 days,but a A temporary sign permit may be reissued by the director approval authority for 2 additional per it periods of 30 days each per calendar year, except for balloon sign permits which may not be reissued. C. Types and locations. Types and locations of temporary signs shall be as follows: Standards for all temporary signs, except balloon signs, that require a temporary sign permit by Subsection 18.435.100.A above are as follows: 1. A maximum of 1 temporary sign may be allowed at a time for each owner or occupant of property or building; -- . . . . - .. . •_ ' . . . - - . dwellings. Exempted lawn signs in residential zones arc not provided in this provision; 2. The total area of a temporary sign shall not exceed 24 square feet for all faces and no more than or 12 square feet per face, except for banners which shall not exceed 24 square feet per sign face Guch signs are not permitted for single family and duplex dwellings. The permitted area for a banner shall be no more than 21 square feet per face with the total sign arca not to exceed 21 square feet; 3. Sec 18.435.015.A.46 for the types of temporary signs that may be approved; Temporary signs shall be located on private property; 4. Temporary signs shall not be located in the public right-of-way or the clear vision area as described in Chapter 18.930, Vision Clearance Areas, except for banners that may be hung across the right-of-way where approved by the city engineer; 5. Temporary signs shall not be illuminated in any way or utilize electrical wiring; 6. Temporary signs shall not contain a reader-board or electronic information sign component; and 7. Temporary signs shall not be permanently attached to the ground, buildings, or other structures. manager's designee; - • . ..* Signs 18.435-16 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.1 D. Standards for balloon signs that require a temporary sign permit by Subsection 18.435.100.A above are as follows: 1. A maximum of 1 stationary balloon or cluster of children's balloons may be allowed per calendar year for each owner or occupant of property or building; 2. A balloon sign may remain in place for a maximum of 10 days per calendar year; 3. A balloon sign may be allowed as a roof sign; 4. A balloon sign shall not exceed 25 feet in height or float in the air higher than 25 feet above the nearest building's roof line; and 5. A balloon sign shall be secured to a structure or the ground. D. Location. The location of a temporary sign requiring-a permit shall be as approved by the approval authority. Exempted lawn signs shall be placed only on private property, outside of the public right structures. (Ord.04-02) 18.435.110 Nonconforming Signs A. Applicability.For the purposes of this chapter,non-conforming signs will be defined as follows: 1. Except as provided in this chapter, signs in existence on March 20, 1978, in compliance with Ordinance Nos. 77-89 and 78-16, which do not conform to the provisions of this chapter,but that were constructed, erected or maintained in compliance with all previous regulations, shall be regarded as nonconforming signs that may be continued until March 20, 1988. 2. Signs in existence on January 11, 1971, which do not conform to the provisions of this chapter, but that were constructed,erected or maintained in compliance with all previous regulations,were regarded as nonconforming signs and could be continued for a period of 10 years from January 11, 1971. All such signs that were not brought into compliance with the standards in Ordinance Nos. 77-89 and 78-16 and the extensions granted,are now in violation of this chapter. 3. Signs located on premises annexed into the city after January 11, 1971,which do not comply with the provisions of this chapter, shall be brought into compliance with this chapter within a period of 10 years after the effective date of the annexation. 4. Any sign that is structurally altered, relocated or replaced shall immediately be brought into compliance with all of the provisions of this chapter,except the repairing and restoration of a sign on site or away from the site to a safe condition. Any part of a sign or sign structure for normal maintenance shall be permitted without loss of nonconforming status. B. Restrictions. For purposes of this chapter, a sign face or message change shall be subject to the following provisions: 1. A sign face or message change on a nonconforming sign is not allowed as an alteration when the affected property and sign structure have been abandoned for greater than 90 days; Signs 18.435-17 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.1 2. A sign face or message change shall be allowed as an alteration only for existing conforming signs and for nonconforming signs prior to their amortization expiration date;and 3. No sign permit shall be required for allowable sign face or message changes. C. Reconstruction. Should a nonconforming sign or sign structure or nonconforming portion of structure be destroyed or repaired by any means to an extent of more than 50 percent of its replacement cost,it shall not be reconstructed except in conformity with the provisions of this chapter. D. Requirements for conformance. Signs in existence on the effective date of this chapter that do not comply with provisions regulating flashing signs; use of par spotlights or rotating beacons; rotating and revolving signs; flags, banners, streamers, or strings of lights, or temporary or incidental signs; shall be made to conform within 90 days from the effective date of this chapter. (Ord. 04-03) 18.435.120 Removal of Nonconforming and/or Abandoned Signs A. Conformance required. All signs erected after the effective date of this title, which are in violation of any provisions of this chapter, shall be removed or brought into conformance upon written notice by the director. B. Removal. All signs that do not comply with this chapter,but were erected prior to the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter, shall be removed or brought into conformance within 60 days from written notice by certified mail given by the director. C. Enforcement. If the owner of sign, building, structure or premises fails to comply with the written order, the director may then cite the owner into court subject to Chapter 18.20, Administration and Enforcement.The following exceptions apply: 1. Section 18.435.110 provides for certain time limits and other conditions for certain signs as described therein. 2. Any sign that by its condition or location presents an immediate or serious danger to the public, by order of the building official,shall be removed or repaired within the time the building official niay-speei€y specifies. In the event the owner of such sign cannot be found or refuses to comply with the order to remove,the building official shall then have the dangerous sign removed and the owner cited for noncompliance and recovery of any damage or expense. 3. All temporary signs shall be removed as provided in 18.135.100.B.1, or in the case of temporary balloons as provided in 18.135.090.C. D. Responsible party for removal. Any person who owns or leases a nonconforming or abandoned sign or sign structure shall remove such sign and sign structure when the expiration of the amortization period for the sign(s)as provided in Section 18.435.110 has occurred or the sign has been abandoned: 1. If the person who owns or leases such sign fails to remove it as provided in this section, the director shall give the owner of the building, structure or premises upon which such sign is located,60 days'written notice to remove it; 2. If the sign has not been removed at the expiration of the 60 days'written notice, the director may remove such sign at cost to the owner of the building,structure or premises; Signs 18.435-18 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.1 3. Signs that are in full compliance with sign regulations,which the successor to a person's business agrees to maintain as provided in this chapter, need not be removed in compliance with this section; and 4. Costs incurred by the city due to removal, may be made a lien against the land or premises on which such sign is located, after notice and hearing, and may be collected or foreclosed in the same manner as liens otherwise entered in the liens docket of the city. 18.435.130 Base Zone Regulations A. R-7, R-4.5, R-3.5, R-2 and R-1 zones. No sign of any character shall be wed allowed in an the R-7,R-4.5,R-3.5,R-2L or R-1 zone except the following: 1. Wall sign(s)may shall not exceed a combined total area of 4 square feet; 2. Every housing complex shall be allowed 1 permanent freestanding sign at each entry point to the housing complex from the public right-of-way, with the site properly landscaped, and not exceeding 32 square feet per face in area. Illumination may be approved provided it does not create a public or private nuisance, as determined by the director considering the purpose of the zone; 3. Every platted subdivision shall be allowed 1 permanent, freestanding sign at each entry point to the subdivision from the public right-of-way, with the site properly landscaped and not exceeding 32 square feet per face in area. Illumination may be approved provided it does not create a public or private nuisance,as determined by the director considering the purpose of the zone; 4. For nonresidential uses, 1 illuminated or non-illuminated freestanding sign not exceeding 6 feet in height and 32 square feet in area per sign face for uses approved through the site development review or conditional use process will shall be pet:miffed allowed. Wall signs may shall not exceed 5 percent of the gross area of the wall face on which the sign is mounted; 5. Directional signs on private property when such signs are solely designed to identify driveway entrances and exits for motorists on adjoining public streets will shall be peed allowed. 1 sign with an area of 4 square feet per face shall be pefinitted allowed per driveway. Such signs shall be consistent with Chapter 18.930,Vision Clearance Areas; 6. Temporary signs in compliance with Sections 18.435.090 and 18.435.100; 7. Lawn signs in compliance with Subsections 18.435.060.A.1,A.6,and B.2; 8. Special condition signs in compliance with Section 18.435.090;and 9. Additional permitted allowed signs include awning sign(s)and painted wall sign(s). B. R-12, R-25 and R-40 zones. No sign shall be permitted allowed in the R-12, R-25Z or R-40 zone except for the following: 1. Wall sign(s) may shall not exceed a combined total area of 1 square foot per dwelling unit-and may not project from the wall face; Signs 18.435-19 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.1 2. Every housing complex shall be allowed 1 permanent freestanding sign at each entry point to the housing complex from the public right-of-way, with the site properly landscaped and not exceeding 32 square feet in area per sign face. Illumination may be approved provided it does not create a public or private nuisance, as determined by the director considering the purpose of the zone; 3. Every platted subdivision shall be allowed 1 permanent freestanding sign at each entry point to the subdivision from the public right-of-way, with the site properly landscaped, and not exceeding 32 square feet in area per sign face. Illumination may be approved provided it does not create a public or private nuisance, as determined by the director considering the purpose of the zone; 4. For nonresidential uses, 1 illuminated or non-illuminated freestanding sign not exceeding 6 feet in height and 32 square feet in area per sign face for uses approved through the site development review or conditional use process will shall be permitted allowed. Wall signs may shall not exceed 5 percent of the gross area of the wall face on which the sign is mounted; 5. Directional signs on private property when such signs are solely designed to identify driveway entrances and exits for motorists on adjoining public streets will shall be permitted allowed. 1 sign with an area of 4 square feet per face shall be peed allowed per driveway. Such signs shall be consistent with Chapter 18.930,Vision Clearance Areas; 6. Temporary signs in compliance with Sections 18.435.090 and 18.435.100; 7. Lawn signs in compliance with Subsections 18.435.060.A.1,A.6,and B.2; 8. Special condition signs in compliance with Section 18.435.090; and 9. Additional permitted allowed signs including include awning sign(s)and painted wall sign(s). C. C-G zone and MU CBD zones. No sign shall be permitted allowed in the C-G zone and MU CBD zone:,except for the following: 1. Freestanding signs than have certain are subject to the following limitations and conditions permitted on properties in C G and MU CBD zones: a. 1 multi-faced, freestanding sign shall be permitted allowed, cubject to conditions and b. A reader-board assembly may be an integral part of the freestanding sign, c. The maximum square footage of signs shall be 70 square feet per face or a total of 140 square feet for all sign faces. No part of any freestanding sign shall extend over a property line into the public right-of-way space, d. The sign area may be increased 1 square foot for each lineal foot the sign is moved back from the front property line to which the sign is adjacent. If the street is curbed and paved, the measurement may shall be taken from a point that is 15 feet from the pavement. This increase in sign area is limited to a maximum of 90 square feet per face or a total of 180 square feet for all faces,and Signs 18.435-20 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.1 e. Freestanding signs located next to the public right-of-way shall not exceed 20 feet in height. Height may be increased 1 foot in height for each 10 feet of setback from the property line or a point 15 feet from the edge of pavement, whichever is less, to a maximum of 22 feet in height; 2. Wall signs. a. Wall signs, including illuminated reader-boards, may be erected or maintained but shall not exceed in gross area 15 percent of any building face on which the sign is to be mounted, b. Wall signs may shall not project more than 18 inches from the wall or extend above the wall to which they are attached,and c. If it is determined through the site development review process that the wall sign's visual appeal and overall design quality would be served, an additional 50 percent of the allowable sign area may be petted allowed.No copy will shall be permitted allowed,however,in the additional area permitted. For purposes of this subsection, "copy" includes symbols, logos, and letters; 3. Directional signs on private property when such signs are solely designed to identify driveway entrances and exits for motorists on adjoining public streets. 1 sign with an area of 4 square feet per face shall be wed allowed per driveway. Such signs shall be consistent with Chapter 18.930,Vision Clearance Areas; 4. Electronic message centers information signs in compliance with Subsection 18.435.090.0 18.135.090.D shall be permitted; 5. Temporary signs in compliance with Sections 18.435.090 and 18.435.100; 6. Lawn signs in compliance with Subsections 18.435.060.A47 A.6;and B.2; 7. Special condition signs in compliance with Section 18.435.090; and 8. Additional permitted allowed signs ineluding include awning sign(s), flush pitched "roof' sign(s),freeway-oriented sign(s),tenant sign(s),projecting sign(s),and painted wall sign(s). D. C-P zone.No sign shall be permitted allowed in the C-P zone except for the following: 1. Freestanding signs chap have certain are subject to the following limitations and conditions- a. 1 multifaced, multi-faced freestanding sign per—prenfisee shall be permitted allowed per premises, •..•- . . .• •.•• . . •-•• . • . . . - b. A reader-board assembly may be an integral part of the freestanding sign, c. The maximum square footage of freestanding signs shall be 32 square feet per face or a total of 64 square feet for all sign faces. No part of any freestanding sign shall extend over a property line into the public right-of-way-spaee, d. The sign area may be increased 1 square foot for each lineal foot the sign is moved back from Signs 18.435-21 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.1 the front property line to which the sign is adjacent. If the street is curbed and paved the measurement may shall be taken from a point that is 15 feet from the pavement.This increase in sign area is limited to a maximum of 52 square feet per face or a total of 104 square feet for all faces,and e. Freestanding signs located next to the public right-of-way shall not exceed 8 feet in height. Height may be increased 1 foot in height for each 10 feet of setback from the property line or a point 15 feet from the edge of pavement, whichever is less, to a maximum of 10 feet in height; 2. Wall signs shall have certain are subject to the following limitations and conditions when permitted on properties in the C P zone: a. Wall signs, including illuminated readerboards reader-board signs, may be erected or maintained but shall not exceed 5 percent in gross area of any wall face on which the sign is to be mounted, b. Wall signs shall be parallel to the face of the building upon which the sign is located,and c. If it is determined through the site development review process that the wall sign's visual appeal and overall design quality would be served, an additional 50 percent of the allowable sign area may be permitted allowed.No copy vial shall be peed allowed,however,in the additional area-pelted. For purposes of this subsection, "copy" includes symbols, logos and letters; 3. Directional signs on private property when such signs are solely designed to identify driveway entrances and exits for motorists on adjoining public streets. 1 sign with an area of 4 square feet per face shall be permitted allowed per driveway. Such signs shall be consistent with Chapter 18.930,Vision Clearance Areas; 4. Temporary signs in compliance with Sections 18.435.090 and 18.435.100; 5. Lawn signs in compliance with Subsections 18.435.060.4.-47 A.6;and B.2; 6. Special condition signs in compliance with Section 18.435.090; and 7. Additional permitted allowed signs including include awning sign(s), flush pitched"roof' sign(s) and painted wall sign(s). E. C-N and C-C zones. No sign shall be peii-14t-ted allowed in the C-N and C-C zones except for the following: 1: Freestanding signs shall have certain are subject to the following limitations and conditions when permitted on properties in the C N or C C zoncn: a. 1 multifaced, multi-faced freestanding sign per premises shall be allowed per premises, b. A reader-board assembly may be an integral part of the freestanding sign, Signs 18.435-22 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.1 c. The maximum square footage of freestanding signs shall be 32 square feet per face or a total of 64 square feet for all sign faces. No part of any freestanding sign shall extend over a property line into the public right-of-way space, d. The sign area may be increased 1 square foot for each lineal foot the sign is moved back from the front property line to which the sign is adjacent. If the street is curbed and paved the measurement may shall be taken from a point that is 15 feet from the pavement.This increase in sign area is limited to a maximum of 52 square feet per face or a total of 104 square feet for all faces,and e. Freestanding signs located next to the public right-of-way shall not exceed 20 feet in height. Height may be increased 1 foot in height for each 10 feet of setback from the property line or a point 15 feet from the edge of pavements whichever is less, to a maximum of 22 feet in height; 2. Wall signs Shall have certain are subject to the following limitations and conditions when a. Wall signs, including illuminated reader—beards reader-board signs, may be erected or maintained but shall not exceed in gross area 10 percent of any building face on which the sign is to be mounted, b. Wall signs shall be parallel to the face of the building upon which the sign is located,and c. If it is determined through the site development review process that the wall sign's visual appeal and overall design quality would be served, an additional 50 percent of the allowable sign area may be pet ted allowed.No copy will shall be peri ted allowed,however,in the additional area permitted. For purposes of this subsection, "copy" includes symbols, logos and letters; 3. Directional signs on private property when such signs are solely designed to identify driveway entrances and exits for motorists on adjoining public streets. 1 sign with an area of 4 square feet per face shall be permitted allowed per driveway. Such signs shall be consistent with Chapter 18.930,Vision Clearance Areas; 4. Temporary signs in compliance with Sections 18.435.090 and 18.435.100; 5. Lawn signs in compliance with Subsections 18.435.060.44;A.6;and B.2; 6. Special condition signs in compliance with Section 18.435.090; and 7. Additional permitted allowed signs including include awning sign(s),tenant sign(s),flush pitched "roof'sign(s)„and painted wall sign(s). F. Industrial zones. No signs shall be peed allowed in the I-P, I-L, or I-H zone except for the following: 1. Freestanding signs (hall have certain are subject to the following limitations and conditions_ Signs 18.435-23 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.1 a. 1 multifaced, multi-faced freestanding sign shall be permitted allowed subject to condition:, and limitations as stated herein, b. A reader-board assembly may be an integral part of the freestanding sign, c. The maximum square footage of signs shall be 70 square feet per face or a total of 140 square feet for all sign faces. No part of any freestanding sign shall extend over a property line into the public right-of-way-wee, d. The sign area may be increased 1 square foot for each lineal foot the sign is moved back from the front property line to which the sign is adjacent. If the street is curbed and paved, the measurement may shall be taken from a point that is 15 feet from the pavement.This increase in sign area is limited to a maximum of 90 square feet per face or a total of 180 square feet for all faces,and e. Freestanding signs located next to the public right-of-way shall not exceed 20 feet in height. Height may be increased 1 foot in height for each 10 feet of setback from the property line or a point 15 feet from the edge of pavement, whichever is less, to a maximum of 22 feet in height; 2. Wall signs G'hall save certain are subject to the following limitations and conditions when a. Wall signs, including illuminated reader-board signs reader beams, may be erected or maintained but shall not exceed in gross area 15 percent of any building face on which the sign is to be mounted, b. Wall signs may shall not project more than 18 inches from the wall or extend above the wall to which they are attached,and c. If it is determined through the site development review process that the wall sign's visual appeal and overall design quality would be served, an additional 50 percent of the allowable sign area may be wed allowed.No copy will shall be petted allowed,however,in the additional area petted. For purposes of this subsection, "copy" includes symbols, logos and letters; 3. Directional signs on private property when such signs are solely designed to identify driveway entrances and exits for motorists on adjoining public streets. 1 sign with an area of 4 square feet per face shall be petted allowed per driveway. Such signs shall be consistent with Chapter 18.930,Vision Clearance Areas; 4. Temporary signs in compliance with Sections 18.435.090 and 18.435.100; 5. Lawn signs in compliance with Subsections 18.435.060.1+A.6;and B.2; 6. Special condition signs in compliance with Section 18.435.090; and 7. Additional petted allowed signs including include awning sign(s), tenant sign(s), freeway- oriented sign(s),projecting sign(s),flush pitched"roof'sign(s),and painted wall sign(s). Signs 18.435-24 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.1 G. Additional requirements in commercial and industrial zones, except signs subject to Subsection 18.435.130.H below. If it is determined through the site development review process that the sign's visual appeal and overall design quality would be served while maintaining the intent and purpose of this chapter, an additional 50 percent of the allowable sign area and 25 percent of sign height may be permit allowed. No copy will shall be pelted allowed in the additional area or height. For purposes of this subsection the word"copy" includes symbols, logos and figures, as well as letters. 1. Each freestanding sign shall be surrounded by an area set aside to protect the sign from vehicles maneuverinji on the site negotiating in the parking arca of the busine.i and the area set aside shall be landscaped. a. The required site plan shall show the size and shape of the area set aside for the sign and the landscaping shall be represented on the plan required by permit and shall be subject to the review by the approval authority and control of the approval authority, through the site and b. On existing sites where a landscaped area ialafid is not feasible, the minimum clearance between the lowest portion of a freestanding sign and the ground shall be 14 feet in any vehicle maneuvering area. 2. No freestanding sign, nor any portion of any freestanding sign, shall be located or project over any portion of a street, sidewalk or other public right-of-way or property unless an exception has been granted. 3. When a premises contains more than a single tenant but is not defined as a shopping center, the provisions of a freestanding sign shall take into consideration the need for providing a signing system that is harmonious in appearance and legible: a. The building owner shall provide, at his own the owner's expense, a common support for all tenant signage; and b. Up to an additional 50 percent of sign copy area may be permitted allowed through the site development review process so as to adequately identify the separate tenants when determined that the increased sign area will not be inconsistent with the purpose of this chapter. 4. Shopping centers or industrial parks shall establish a single signing format: a. Up to an additional 50 percent of sign area may be permitted allowed through the site development review process to adequately identify the complex when it can be determined that the increased sign area will not be inconsistent with the purposes of this chapter; b. This increase should be judged according to unique identification needs and circumstances that necessitate additional area to make the sign sufficiently legible; and c. When a shopping center or industrial park has more than 1 main entrance on separate frontages, a second freestanding sign may be allowed through the site development review process.The 2 allowable signs shall face separate frontages and are not intended to be viewed simultaneously. Signs 18.435-25 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.1 5. Legal owners or occupants of properties or buildings that are in shopping plazas and are directly locatedL or are proposed to be located,. on a commercially- and industrially-zoned corner property(ies) (one or more contiguous tax lots located at the intersection of two or more public streets), shall be allowed to have 1 freestanding sign along each street frontage when all of the following are met: a. A sign permit shall be required for each sign prior to its erection; b. The total combined height of 2 freestanding signs on the premises shall not exceed 150 percent of what is normally allowed for 1 freestanding sign in the same base zone; c. Neither of the signs shall exceed the sign height normally allowed in the base zone in which the signs are located; d. No more than 2 freestanding signs shall be petted allowed; e. The 2 allowable signs shall face separate frontages and are not intended to be viewed simultaneously;and f. All other provisions of this chapter chall apply. 6. Shopping centers in the C-G zone shall be entitled to freestanding signage according to the following optional standards: a. A maximum of 2 freestanding signs shall be peed allowed per feffdway street frontage provided they can meet both sign area and sign height requirements as provided in this subsection; b. The total combined height of 2 both signs shall not exceed 150 percent of the sign height normally allowed for 1 freestanding sign in the same base zone; however, neither shall exceed the height normally allowed in the same base zone; c. The total combined sign area for of both signs shall not exceed 150 percent of what is normally allowed for one freestanding sign in the same base zone; however, neither shall exceed the area normally allowed in the same base zone; d. Neither sign shall pose a vision clearance problem or chall project into the public right-of- way;and e. A sign permit shall be required prior to erection of any freestanding sign referred to in this subsection. (Ord. 10-02 §2; Ord. 09-13) H. MU-CBD and TMU zones. The following signs are allowed in the TMU zone and the MU-CBD zone, except that MU-CBD properties with a Planned Development(PD) designation are subject to the residential zone sign standards in Subsection 18.435.130.B and MU-CBD properties north of Pacific Highway or with frontage on Pacific Highway or Hall Boulevard are subject to the C'-G zone sign standards in Subsection 18.435.130.0. 1. General provisions. a. Reader-board and electronic information signs are allowed as follows: Signs 18.435-26 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.1 i. A freestanding sign, window sign, wall sign, or projecting sign may include a reader- board or electronic information sign component. ii. If a wall or projecting sign includes such a component, the reader-board or electronic information component shall be limited in size to 50 square feet or 50 percent of the area of the wall or projecting sign, whichever is less. iii. Messages and animation shall be displayed at intervals of greater than two seconds in duration. Traveling light patterns("chaser effect")shall be prohibited. b. Sign lighting methods are allowed as follows: i. In addition to the sign lighting methods described in Subsection 18.435.015.A.25, backlighting is allowed as a type of indirect or external lighting where the light source is behind an opaque sign area and not directly visible from the front of the sign. ii. All signs may use indirect or external lightinz All indirect or external sign lighting shall be shielded, angled, or located such that it does not shine directly onto adjacent properties or public rights-of-way. Signs larger than 100 square feet that use indirect or external lighting shall also have shields with a cutoff angle of 90 degrees or greater to ensure that lighting is not directed upward. iii. Only wall signs, window signs, or pedestrian-oriented roof signs may use internal lighting iv. No sign shall use direct lighting, except for electronic information signs and signs with neon tubes or comparable lighting tubes. c. Wall signs,projecting signs, and A-frame signs may project into or be located in City of Tigard public right-of-way as provided in Subsection 18.435.130.H below.Any sign that projects into the City of Tigard right-of-way is subject to approval by the city engineer. No sign shall project into or be located in Oregon Department of Transportation right-of-way. d. Signs on fences, retaining walls, or walls serving the same purpose as a fence are prohibited except where specifically designed as entryway signs. 2. Freestanding signs, but not including freestanding freeway-oriented signs that are allowed as a special condition sign by Subsection 18.435.130.H.8. a. One multi-faced freestanding sign is allowed per premises.A premises with more than one street frontage may have one sign per frontage. b. The maximum sign area shall be 32 square feet per sign face or 64 square feet for all sign faces. The maximum sign height shall be 3.5 feet, except for freestanding signs associated with a public multi-use trail which shall have a maximum sign height of 8 feet. c. A freestanding sign may be located in the minimum building setback but shall not be located in the public right-of-way or the clear vision area as described in Chapter 18.930. 3. Wall signs, including painted wall signs and flush pitched roof signs. Signs 18.435-27 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C1 a. Multiple wall signs are allowed per building face. b. The total maximum sign area shall not exceed 15 percent of the gross area of the building face. The maximum sign height shall be equal to the height of the building face and shall not extend above the building face, except for flush pitched roof signs which are subject to the height standards in Subsection 18.435.090.F. The maximum horizontal projection shall be 18 inches. c. A wall sign may project into the minimum building setback and public right-of-way. The minimum vertical clearance for wall signs that project into the public right-of-way shall be 10 feet from sidewalk grade. 4. Projecting signs, including awning signs. a. One projecting sign is allowed per building.A building with more than one street frontage may have one sign per frontage. The maximum sign area shall be 32 square feet per sign face or 64 square feet for all sign faces.A building with more titan one street frontage may have one sign on the building corner at the intersection of two street frontages in lieu of one sign per frontage. The maximum sign area for a corner projecting sign shall be 50 square feet per sign face or 100 square feet for all sign faces. b. A building may have the following additional projecting signs: i. A building may have one or more additional awning signs where awnings are provided on the building face that project at least 4 feet into the public right-of-way and occupy at least 50 percent of the width of the building face. The additional signage shall not exceed 32 square feet in size. ii. A building may have one or more additional projecting signs where the signs are perpendicular to the building face, less than 4.5 square feet in size per sign face, and located less than 10 feet from sidewalk grade as measured from the top of sign. The number of additional signs shall not exceed the number of ground floor tenant spaces in the building. c. A projecting sign may project into the minimum building setback and public right-of-way. For signs that project into the right-of-way, the minimum vertical clearance for awning signs and signs less than 4.5 square feet in size per sign face shall be 8 feet from sidewalk grade. The minimum vertical clearance for all other projecting signs shall be 10 feet from sidewalk grade. The maximum horizontal projection into the right-of-way shall be 6 feet or the minimum sidewalk width along the building frontage, whichever is less.A projecting sign shall not conflict with an existing or planned street tree. 5. Pedestrian-oriented roof signs. a. A pedestrian-oriented roof sign is allowed only on buildings with a height of 20 feet or less. b. The maximum number of signs allowed shall be equal to the number of ground floor tenant spaces in the building. Signs 18.435-28 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.1 c. The maximum sign area shall be 45 square feet. The maximum sign height shall be two feet above the roof line of the building and shall not extend below the roof line of the building. d. The sign shall be oriented to the street upon which the building fronts. 6. A-frame signs. a. The maximum number ofA-frame signs allowed shall be equal to the number of ground floor tenant spaces in the building or the equivalent of one sign for every 30 linear feet of street-facing building facade, whichever is greaten b. The maximum sign area shall be 6 square feet per sign face or 12 square feet for all sign faces The maximum sign width and height shall be 3 feet. c. An A-frame sign may be located on private property or in the public right-of-way adjacent to any premises by the person in control of those premises. Where the sign is located in the right-of-way, it shall be located so as to maintain a minimum unobstructed sidewalk width of 4 feet for pedestrian through-travel.It shall be located behind the curb or a minimum of 10 feet from the edge of the nearest travel lane where no curb is present.It shall not be located in the clear vision area described in Chapter 18.930 or where it conflicts with the use of any service area, driveway, water quality facility, bicycle parking area,or on-or off- street ffstreet parking or loading area.It may be located in a landscape strip with approval by the city engineer. d. An A-frame sign shall only be displayed when the sign owner's business is open to the public: 7. Permit exempt signs,such as directional and window signs, are allowed as described in Subsection 18.435.060.A, except that the total maximum sign area of all window signs shall not exceed 25 percent of the gross window area on the building face. 8. Special condition signs,such as bench, cultural institution,entryway,and freeway-oriented signs are allowed as described in Subsection 18.435.090. Freeway-oriented signs are only allowed in the TMU zone adjacent to the Highway 217 or Interstate 5 rights-of-way. 9. Temporary signs,such as balloon,banner, and lawn signs are allowed as described in Subsection 18.435.100,except that A-frame signs are allowed as described in Subsection 18.435.130.H.6. I. Mixed-use zones except MU-CBD and TMU zones. Sign standards for the MUE,MUE-1,MUE-2, MUC,MUC-1, and MUR zones are located in their respective plan districts in Chapters 18.620 and 18.670. 18.435.140 Sign Code Adjustments A. Adjustments. 1. For all signs except those in the TMU zone, the The approval authority may grant an adjustment to the requirements of this chapter through a Type I or Type II procedure, as provided in Sections 18.710.050 and 18.710.070,using approval criteria in Subsection 18.790.030.8.6. Signs 18.435-29 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.1 2. For all signs in the TMU zone, the approval authority may grant an adjustment to the requirements of this chapter through a Type II procedure, as provided in Subsection18.660.040.C.4, using approval criteria in Subsection 18.660.040.C.4.b. B. If an adjustment is granted, the rights thereby given to the applicant shall continue to exist and to belong to the applicant or any other owner of the land for a period of 1.5 years from the date of final approval: 1. If, at the expiration of 1.5 years from the date of approval, construction of the structure or initiation of the use giving rise to the need for the adjustment has not begun, the rights given by the adjustment approval shall terminate without further action by the city; and 2. Said rights shall also terminate at or after the expiration of 1.5 years from approval if, though commenced within 1.5 years,construction ceases and is not resumed within 60 days. (Ord.09-13) Signs 18.435-30 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.2 Chapter 18.650 TIGARD DOWNTOWN PLAN DISTRICT 18.650.070 Building and Site Design Standards 4. Weather protection. b. Awnings/marquees/canopies shall project a minimum of 3 feet from the facade and may project a maximum of 6 feet into the public right-of-way or the minimum sidewalk width along the building frontage,whichever is less.Any element that projects into the right-of-way is subject to approval by the city engineer. c. Marquees shall have a minimum 10-foot clearance from the bottom of the marquee to the sidewalk. Awnings and canopies shall have a minimum 8-foot clearance from the bottom of the awning or canopy to the sidewalk. 18.650.120 Signs Signs in the MU-CBD zone are subject to the standards and procedures in Chapter 18.435, Signs and shall utilize the MU-CBD zone sign standards in Subsection 18.435.130.H. Tigard Downtown Plan District 18.650 XX Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.2 Chapter 18.660 TIGARD TRIANGLE PLAN DISTRICT 18.660.020 Applicability A. Applicability. 3. Public rights-of-way. The standards in Section 18.660.090 apply to all public rights-of-way in the Tigard Triangle Plan District regardless of the zone. 4. The boundary of the Tigard Triangle Plan District is shown on Map 18.660.A. The TMU zone and C-G zone are also shown on this map and the official zoning map. Transportation facilities are shown on Map 18.660.B. 18.660.040 Review Process C. Land use review. 4. Adjustment application. An adjustment application shall be processed through a Type II procedure as provided in Section 18.710.060. b. An adjustment application shall be approved when all of the following approval criteria have been met for each requested adjustment: iv. The proposed adjustment is needed to address transportation network connectivity standards and includes, where practicable, pedestrian, bicycle, or vehicle transportation facilities. Transportation network connectivity standards are provided in Subsection 18.660.090.C.3. v. The proposed adjustment is for the removal of a district tree, and the applicant will pay the district tree removal fee listed in the city's Master Fees and Charges Schedule unless a finding is made that the proposed development site cannot be reasonably developed without removal of the district tree. District tree information and requirements are provided in Subsection 18.660.070.H. 18.660.050 Pre-Existing Development and Approvals C. Sites with pre-existing land uses. 1. A pre-existing land use that does not meet the land use standards in Section 18.660.060 may continue but shall not expand beyond the boundaries of the site that it occupied prior to the effective date of this chapter, except for any pre-existing land uses within the area bounded by 66`''Avenue and 68th Avenue to the east and west and Dartmouth Street and Franklin Street to the north and south, respectively. Any pre-existing land uses within this area that do not meet the land use standards in Section 18.660.060 may continue and expand beyond the boundaries of the site that it occupied prior to the effective date of this chapter, but not beyond the boundaries of the area described above. Tigard Triangle Plan District 18.660 XX Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.2 18.660.080 Building Design Standards D. Building projections. Building projections are allowed as follows: Figure 18.660.3 Building Projection Standards Building Projection Standards •— 1'max.projection into minimum building setback F— 4'max.projection into public right-of-way i 3'min.depth for required weather protection and 6'max.projection into public right-of-way 8'min.vertical clearance 1 1 Private property Public right-of-way 2. Balconies may project into the minimum building setback and public right-of-way as shown in Figure 18.660.3 above. Balconies may project a maximum of 4 feet into the right-of-way. Balconies that project into the right-of-way shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 10 feet from sidewalk grade and are subject to approval by the city engineer. 3. Weather protection elements for pedestrians along building facades, such as canopies or awnings, may project into the minimum building setback and public right-of-way as shown in Figure 18.660.3 above. Weather protection elements may project into the right-of-way a maximum of 6 feet or the minimum sidewalk width along the building frontage, whichever is less. Elements that project into the right-of-way shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 8 feet from sidewalk grade and are subject to approval by the city engineer. 4. Signs may project into the minimum building setback and public right-of-way subject to the standards in Subsection 18.435.130.H.1.c and approval by the city engineer. Tigard Triangle Plan District 18.660-XX Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.2 18.660.090 Transportation Facility Standards C. Transportation facility standards. • I. General standards. a. All transportation and associated utility improvements to be placed in a public right-of-way or public access easement shall: i. Except as expressly provided in this Subsection 18.660.090.C, meet the standards of the city as provided in the Public Works Design Manual and Chapter 18.910, Improvement Standards; and 2. Intersection design and spacing. c. New street intersections, including alleys, not shown on Map 18.660.B Transportation Network Map are subject to approval by the city engineer and require an access report. The city engineer shall specify the technical information that must be included in the report. At a minimum, the access report shall show that the proposed street intersection meets stacking, sight distance,and deceleration standards provided in the Public Works Design Manual or the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) publications,or other standards as determined by the applicable road authority. d. Clear vision standards in Chapter 18.930, Vision Clearance Areas, and street spacing standards in Chapter 18.910, Improvement Standards, do not apply to street intersections in the TMU zone. 3. Transportation network connectivity. a. Minimum required transportation improvements are shown on Map 18.660.B Transportation Network Map. Additional transportation improvements for network connectivity may be required by Subsections 3.b. and 3.c below. Alleys are encouraged but not required. Private streets are prohibited. b. Block perimeters shall be 2,500 feet or less in length as measured along the centerlines of streets,unless: i. It is not practicable to construct a street due to topographical constraints,protected natural resource areas, or existing development patterns, and the applicant has submitted an Adjustment application as provided in Subsection 18.660.040.C.4 and obtained the necessary land use approval; or ii. A future street,path, or trail on Map 18.660.B Transportation Network Map provides for a possible future connection that is feasible at the time of the proposed development and meets the block perimeter standard when included as part of the block perimeter measurement. c. Bicycle and pedestrian connections are required where the addition of a connection would link the end of a permanent turnaround to an adjacent street or provide a midblock connection Tigard Triangle Plan District 18.660-XX Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.2 through a long block. A midblock connection is required where at least one block face is 800 feet or more in length. A required connection must go through the interior of the block and connect the block face that is 800 feet or more in length to its opposite block face. Bicycle and pedestrian connections include off-street trails and paths as described in Subsection 18.660.090.C.4.d. 4. Transportation facility design. a. Street design.All streets are subject to the standards in Table 18.660.9 below and as shown in Figure 18.660.5, except for Dartmouth Street, 72nd Avenue, Pacific Highway, and the future business access street parallel to Pacific Highway that connects the western portion of Atlanta Street to the future 74th Avenue. Dartmouth Street, 72nd Avenue, and Pacific Highway are subject to the standards in Subsection 18.910.030.E. The future business access street is subject to the standards in Subsection 18.910.030.E, specifically the local street standard shown in Figure 18.910.6.A. Table 18.660.9 Street Elements and Widths Street Element Width Notes d. Pedestrian facilities. iv. Sidewalks shall have a minimum unobstructed width of 6 feet for pedestrian through- travel, except for A-frame signs where the minimum unobstructed width is 4 feet. Any permanent structures or utilities within the required through-travel area are subject to approval by the city engineer. Any sidewalk area outside of the required through-travel area may be used for commercial purposes by adjacent development or may contain pedestrian amenities, such as street furniture, bicycle parking, trash cans, and drinking fountains. Use of this area for commercial purposes includes, but is not limited to: customer seating, merchandise display, and A-frame signs. Use of this area for commercial purposes is at the sole discretion of the director. A-frame signs are also subject to the standards and procedures in Chapter 18.435, Signs. 18.660.100 Sign Standards Signs in the TMU zone are subject to the standards and procedures in Chapter 18.435, Signs and shall utilize the TMU zone sign standards in Subsection 18.435.130.H. Tigard Triangle Plan District 18.660 XX Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.2 Map 18.660.B Tigard Triangle Transportation Network inav rani i glitari alogromp Tigard Triangle Mini. NMIlid i I I Transportation Network Map ,anti mu I ■ Future street intersection locations MN A 1 and future street,path,and trail 11 1tii H I alignments are illustrative.All future ■ r __ 1P •`•• transportation facilities are subject I. raj, 4 - j to change based on development IN . 4 i Y m review,final design,engineering II r 1 lir am .... ; �� and permitting by the applicable : IN f - ; I 1 approval authority. II Ni] G\��G : • fiNg'.... i , "NT OW \ - Q,`*" N . \ - Ili ...... . -ill PPP \ \_. ip, iir ii Iiii ,� , . .„,,, fir' 1 ■• • ■ .---i illiiimilli* : • • ! _ , •••• DART, H_ • UT :ST , s 1 ill elm;St—ighill\,_ Ira , 1 1r , 1 li IMP 1IS I ` r / lialr7iIt 0 i NMI - ill! II P� ••',1 I i 1 ��iNI i i' *. ,.*f 14*4 I I ' 4 IN 1 ,1111 - �/ , , ,, to„ip* >71%04e • • • ��FALI R R� kih, •••• mum i r_ um ■ Allbillahk ' -i _ me s Transportation Facilities ,.__I! • •� Existing Street ialk • An• i Ns au■ Future Street U..... .l lk Future Path Existing Trail :11111111111 d.m. risk Future Trail III. 1 J • • Oil •ate Bike Lane(Both Sides) 1'�_a r a' •• —----- Bike Lane(East Side) • 11ff - `,1 +, Alleys(Encouraged) 11111.111. - NEW 0 Tigard Triangle Plan District Tigard Triangle Plan District 18.660-XX Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.2 Chapter 18.435 SIGNS 18.435.010 Purpose 18.435.012 Effective Date of this Chapter 18.435.015 Definitions 18.435.020 Permits 18.435.030 Approval Process 18.435.040 Approval Period 18.435.050 Inspections 18.435.060 Permit Exempt Signs 18.435.070 Prohibited Signs 18.435.080 Sign Illumination 18.435.085 Sign Measurement 18.435.090 Special Condition Signs 18.435.100 Temporary Signs 18.435.110 Nonconforming Signs 18.435.120 Removal of Nonconforming and Abandoned Signs 18.435.130 Base Zone Regulations 18.435.140 Sign Code Adjustments 18.435.010 Purpose A. General purposes.The purposes of this chapter are: 1. To protect the health,safety,property and welfare of the public; 2. To promote the neat,clean,orderly and attractive appearance of the community; 3. To accommodate the need of sign users while avoiding nuisances to nearby properties; 4. To ensure safe construction,location,erection and maintenance of signs; 5. To prevent proliferation of signs and sign clutter; 6. To minimize distractions for motorists on public highways and streets; 7. To regulate solely on the basis of time,place and manner of a sign,not on its content;and 8. To regulate the design, quality of materials, construction, location, electrification, illumination and maintenance of all signs visible from public property or from public rights-of-way. B. Compliance with other laws and regulations. It is not the purpose of this chapter to permit the erection or maintenance of any sign at any place or in any manner unlawful under any other ordinance,or state or federal law.(Ord. 04-03) 18.435.012 Effective Date of this Chapter All references made in this chapter to the effective date of this chapter shall mean November 9, 1983, Signs 18.435-1 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.2 unless otherwise specifically stated in an ordinance revision. 18.435.015 Definitions A. Definitions. These definitions are specific to this chapter and are in addition to Chapter 18.30, Definitions. 1. "A-frame sign" -See"Temporary sign." 2. "Abandoned sign" - A structure not containing a message or image for 90 continuous days or a sign not in use for 90 continuous days. 3. "Area"- See Section 18.435.085 for definition of sign area. 4. "Awning sign"-A sign incorporated into or attached to an awning. 5. "Balloon"- See"Temporary sign." 6. "Banner"- See"Temporary sign." 7. "Bench sign"-A bench designed to seat people with a sign painted or affixed on the surface. 8. "Billboard" - A freestanding sign in excess of the maximum size allowed, with adjustments, in the locations where it is located or proposed to be located. 9. "Building face" - All street-facing wall areas in one or more parallel planes, including windows and building projections. 10. "Cultural institution auxiliary sign" - A sign placed and maintained by, or on behalf of, a subordinate commercial use in a cultural institution. 11. "Cutout" - Letters, figures, characters and/or representations in cutout or irregular form attached to or superimposed upon a sign. 12. "Directional sign"-A permanent sign designed and erected solely for the purpose of traffic or pedestrian direction. 13. "Display surface" - The area made available by the sign structure for the purpose of displaying the message or image. 14. "Electrical sign"-Any sign utilizing electrical wiring. 15. "Electronic information sign" - A sign with lighted changeable copy or message that changes at set intervals, each lasting more than two seconds, by electronic process or remote control. This type of sign is also known as an automatic changeable copy sign or electronic variable message center. An electronic information sign is not a reader-board sign or a rotating, revolving or moving sign. 16. "Entryway sign" -A sign placed by or on behalf of the city at an entry to the city. Signs 18.435-2 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.2 17. "Flashing sign" - Any sign that is illuminated by an intermittent or sequential flashing light source with an interval cycle that is 2 seconds or less in duration, or is animated in any way so as to create the illusion of movement without actual physical movement or the illusion of a flashing or intermittent light or light source. 18. "Flush pitched roof sign" - A type of wall sign attached to a mansard or similar type of vertically aligned roof. 19. "Freestanding sign" - A sign erected and mounted on a freestanding frame, mast or pole and not attached to any building. 20. "Freeway interchange" - Any intersection of an exit off-ramp of Interstate Highway 5 or State Highway 217 with a city street. 21. "Freeway-oriented sign" - A sign primarily designed to be read by a motorist traveling on a highway designated by the Oregon State Highway Department as a freeway or expressway; specifically, these shall be Interstate 5 and Oregon State Highway 217, and shall not include Highway 99W. 22. "Immediate or serious danger"- a. Whenever any portion of the structure is damaged by fire, earthquake, wind, flood or other cause, and any member or appurtenance is likely to fail,become detached or dislodged, or to collapse and thereby injure persons or damage property; b. Whenever any portion of the structure is not of sufficient strength or stability or is not so anchored, attached or fastened in place as to be capable of resisting a wind pressure of 0.5 of that specified in the state building code for this type structure or similar structure,and will not exceed the working stresses permitted in the state building code for such structures; or c. Whenever the location of the sign structure obstructs the view of motorists traveling on the public streets or private property, and thus causes damage to property or thereby injures persons. 23. "Industrial park" - A parcel of land which complies with the requirements in Chapter 18.130, Industrial Zones. 24. "Lawn sign"-See"Temporary sign." 25. "Lighting methods" - a. Direct lighting is where the light source is plainly visible on the sign face and not concealed within or separate from the sign. Examples include neon tube lighting and light-emitting diodes on an electronic information sign; b. Indirect or external lighting is where the light source is separate from the sign face or cabinet and is designed to shine on the sign;and c. Internal lighting is where the light source is concealed within the sign face or cabinet and is designed to illuminate the sign from within. Signs 18.435-3 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.2 26. "Maintenance" -Normal care needed to keep a sign functional such as cleaning, oiling, changing and repair of light bulbs and sign faces.Does not include structural alteration. 27. "Nonconforming sign" - A sign or sign structure lawfully erected and properly maintained that would not be allowed under the sign regulations presently applicable to the site. 28. "Non-structural trim" - The moldings, battens, caps, nailing strips and latticing, letters and walkways that are attached to a sign structure. 29. "Painted wall decorations" - Displays painted directly on a wall, designed and intended as a decorative or ornamental feature. Decorations may also include lighting. 30. "Painted wall highlights" - Painted areas that highlight a building's architectural or structural features. 31. "Painted wall sign"-A sign applied to a building wall with paint that has no sign structure. 32. "Premises" - One or more lots on which buildings or site improvements may exist that are designed as a unit. 33. "Projecting sign" - A sign, or any portion of a sign, attached to a building that is not parallel to the building face or that projects more than 18 inches from the wall plane of the building face. A projecting sign may be attached to a wall or a building projection,such as a marquee,balcony,or awning; however, the amount of the projection shall be measured from the wall plane in all cases and not the building projection to which the sign may be attached. A projecting sign shall not extend above the building face to which it is attached,except where there is an existing parapet. 34. "Reader-board sign" - A sign with changeable copy or message that is changed manually not electronically.A reader-board sign is not an electronic information sign. 35. "Roof line" - The top edge of a roof or building parapet, whichever is higher, excluding any cupolas,chimneys or other minor projections. 36. "Roof sign" - A sign erected fully upon or directly above a roof line or parapet of a building or structure. 37. "Rotating,revolving or moving sign" -Any sign,or portion of a sign,that moves in any manner, including but not limited to movement caused by wind,machines,or persons. 38. "Shopping center"-A development of not less than 8 business units. 39. "Shopping plaza" -A development of between 2 and 7 business units. 40. "Sign" - Materials placed or constructed primarily to convey a message with symbols, logos, letters,or other displays that can be viewed from the public right-of-way, another property, or the air. 41. "Sign Projection"-The distance by which a sign extends from a building. 42. "Sign structure" -Any structure that supports or is capable of supporting any sign as described in Signs 18.435-4 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.2 the state building code. A sign structure may be a single pole and may or may not be an integral part of a building. Sign structures are not buildings. 43. "Structural alteration" - Modification of the size, shape or height of a sign structure. Also includes replacement of sign structure materials with other than comparable materials, for example metal parts replacing wood parts. 44. "Temporary sign" - Any sign that is not permanently erected or affixed to the ground or any structure or building: a. A balloon sign is an inflatable, stationary sign anchored by some means to a structure or the ground. Examples include simple children's balloons, hot and cold air balloons, blimps and other dirigibles; b. A banner is a sign made of fabric or other nonrigid material with no enclosing framework; c. A lawn sign is a rigid sign supported by one or more sticks, posts, or rods inserted into the ground or a weighted base;or d. An A-frame sign is a freestanding sign with two possible sign faces supported by a rigid frame in the shape of an"A." 45. "Wall sign" -A sign attached to or painted on the wall plane of a building face with the exposed face of the sign in a plane parallel to the building face and that projects 18 inches or less from the wall plane of the building face. 46. "Window sign" - A sign placed on the inside of a window. A sign placed on the outside of a window is considered a wall sign. 18.435.020 Permits A. Compliance with regulations. No sign or sign structure shall be erected, re-erected, constructed, structurally altered,or relocated within the city limits except as provided by this chapter. B. Signpermits. 1. All permanent signs shall require a sign permit, except those that are exempted by Section 18.435.060. All temporary signs shall require a temporary sign permit as provided by Section 18.435.100, except those that are exempted by Section 18.435.060. A-frame signs allowed by Subsection 18.435.130.H.6 shall be treated as permanent signs for permitting purposes. 2. Each sign or group of signs on a single supporting structure, including sign alterations not exempted by Section 18.435.060,shall require a separate sign permit. 3. All sign permits shall be reviewed through the approval process provided in Section 18.435.030 below. C. Building permits. All signs are subject to the provisions of the state building code where applicable. A building permit may be required. Signs 18.435-5 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.2 D. Electrical permits.All signs are subject to the provisions of the state electrical code where applicable. An electrical permit shall be required for all illuminated signs. E. Retroactive sign permits. The director may require application for sign permits for all signage at a given address if no existing permits previously had been approved or documented. (Ord.09-13) 18.435.030 Approval Process A. Approval process. Sign permits,including temporary sign permits, shall be processed through a Type I procedure, as provided in Section 18.710.050, using the requirements of this chapter as approval criteria. 18.435.040 Approval Period A. Approval period. Sign permit approval shall be effective for a period of 90 days from the date of approval. B. Lapse of approval. Sign permit approval shall lapse if: 1. Substantial construction of the approved permit has not begun within the 90-day period; or 2. Construction on the site is a departure from the approved permit. C. Extension of approval. The approval authority shall, upon written request by the applicant, grant an extension of the approval period not to exceed 90 days provided that: 1. No changes are proposed to the original approved sign permit; 2. The applicant can show intent of initiating construction of the sign within the 90-day extension period;and 3. There have been no changes in the applicable policies and ordinance provisions and state building code provisions on which the approval was based. 18.435.050 Inspections A. Construction inspection. General requirements for the inspection of signs during and following construction: 1. All construction work for which a permit is required shall be subject to an inspection by the building official in compliance with the state building code and this chapter: a. A survey of the lot or proposed location for sign erection may be required by the building official to verify compliance of the structure with approved plans; and b. Neither the building official nor the jurisdiction shall be liable for expense or other obligations entailed in the removal or replacement of any material required to allow inspection. B. Inspection requests. It shall be the duty of the person doing the work authorized by a permit to notify Signs 18.435-6 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.2 the building official that such work is ready for inspection. The building official may require that every request for inspection be filed at least 1 working day before such inspection is desired. C. Required interim inspections. 1. Reinforcing steel or structural framework of any part of the proposed structure shall not be covered or concealed without first obtaining approval of the building official; 2. Foundation inspections shall be made after all required excavations, form work and bolt settings are completed and ready to receive concrete; 3. All anchorages shall be left exposed for inspection; 4. Electrical inspection shall be made by the agency issuing electrical permits. D. Final inspections. Final inspection shall be called for by the applicant when all work is completed. This inspection shall cover all items required by the building official under state law or city ordinances such as the locations, landscaping if required, and general compliance with the approved plans and requirements of this title. E. Director's inspection. The director is authorized to enforce all of the provisions of this chapter: 1. All signs for which permits are required shall be inspected by the director;and 2. Upon presentation of proper credentials,the director may enter at reasonable times any building, structure,or premises in the city to perform any duty imposed upon the position by this chapter. 18.435.060 Permit Exempt Signs A. Exemptions from permit requirements. The following signs and operations do not require a sign permit but shall conform to all other applicable regulations of this chapter and the requirements in Subsection B below: 1. Lawn and A-frame signs in residential zones. a. Multiple lawn and A-frame signs are allowed per premises, b. The total maximum sign area for lawn signs in the R-1, R-2, R-3.5, R-4.5, and R-7 zones shall be 12 square feet per sign face and 24 square feet for all sign faces per premises. The total maximum sign area for lawn signs in all other residential zones shall be 24 square feet for all sign faces per premises, c. The total maximum sign area for A-frame signs in all residential zones shall be 6 square feet per sign face and 12 square feet for all sign faces. A-frame signs may be displayed only between the hours of 8 a.m. and 6 p.m.,and d. Lawn and A-frame signs in residential zones shall be placed on private property and not within the public right-of-way or the clear vision area as provided in Chapter 18.930, Vision Clearance Areas; 2. Signs not oriented or intended to be legible from a right-of-way,other property, or the air; Signs 18.435-7 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.2 3. Signs inside a building, except for flashing signs visible from a right-of-way, other property, or the air; 4. Painted wall decorations; 5. Painted wall highlights; 6. Window signs; 7. Directional signs on private property or directional signs in the public right-of-way that are legally erected by or on behalf of a government agency or road authority; 8. Flags displayed from permanently located freestanding or wall-mounted flagpoles that are designed to allow the flags to be raised and lowered; 9. Sign repair, maintenance, or change of copy or message that does not involve a change of sign size,height,type,or location;and 10. Signs affected by stipulated judgments to which the city is a party that is entered by courts of competent jurisdiction. B. Requirements for exempted signs. All signs exempted from sign permits in Subsection A above shall meet the following requirements: 1. All signs shall be placed on private property with the consent of the property owner.No sign shall be placed on utility poles or in the public right-of-way except where expressly allowed; and 2. Multiple signs shall be allowed per premises and be spaced at least 50 feet apart in residential zones and 30 feet apart in all other base zones. C. Nothing in this title shall prevent the erection, location, or construction of signs on private property where such erection, location, or construction is required by any law or ordinance. Nor shall any public agency or utility be prohibited from erecting signs on private property when otherwise authorized.No sign permit or fee shall be required for such signs. 18.435.070 Prohibited Signs A. Unsafe or improperly maintained signs. No sign shall be constructed, erected, or maintained unless the sign and sign structure is constructed, erected, and maintained to withstand the wind, seismic, or other applicable requirements in the state building code or this title. B. Unauthorized traffic signs. 1. No sign shall be erected at any location that interferes with, obstructs the view of, or could be confused with any authorized traffic sign, signal,or device by reason of position, shape, or color; and 2. No sign shall be erected that makes use of the word"stop,""look," "danger,"or any other similar word,phrase,symbol,or character that is likely to interfere with,mislead,or confuse motorists. Signs 18.435-8 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.2 C. Obscene signs. No sign shall bear or contain statements, words, or pictures in which the dominant theme of the material, taken as a whole,appeals to the prurient interest in sex or is patently offensive because it affronts the contemporary community standard relating to the description or representation of sexual material. D. Obstructing signs. 1. No sign or sign structure shall be constructed or located that obstructs access to any fire escape or other means of ingress or egress from a building or any exit corridor, hallway, or doorway. No sign or sign structure shall cover,wholly or partially,any window or doorway in any manner that substantially limits access to building in case of fire or other emergency;and 2. No sign or sign structure shall be erected at any street intersection that obstructs clear vision as provided in Chapter 18.930,Vision Clearance Areas. E. Roof signs. Roof signs are prohibited, except for temporary balloon signs allowed by Section 18.435.100 and pedestrian-oriented roof signs allowed by Subsection 18.435.130.H. F. Revolving, rotating, or moving signs. Revolving, rotating,or moving signs are prohibited, except for flags allowed by Subsection 18.435.060.A.6 or temporary banners or balloons allowed by Section 18.435.100. G. Flashing signs. Flashing signs of any kind are prohibited,including but not limited to strobe lights. H. Right-of-way signs. Signs in the public right-of-way in whole or in part are prohibited, except for signs legally erected for informational purposes by or on behalf of a government agency,bench signs allowed by Subsection 18.435.090.B, awning signs allowed by Subsection 18.435.090.E, temporary banners allowed by Section 18.435.100,or signs allowed by Subsection 18.435.130.H.l.c in the TMU and MU-CBD zones. Any sign that projects into or is located in City of Tigard right-of-way is subject to approval by the city engineer. No sign shall project into or be located in Oregon Department of Transportation right-of-way. I. Signs on a vehicle. Signs placed on or painted on a motor vehicle or trailer, as defined by ORS Chapter 801, with the primary purpose of providing a sign not otherwise allowed for by this chapter are prohibited. T. Billboards. Billboards are prohibited. (Ord.09-13) 18.435.080 Sign Illumination A. Surface brightness. The surface brightness of any sign shall not exceed that produced by the diffused output obtained from 800 milliampere fluorescent light sources spaced not closer than 8 inches,center on center. B. No exposed incandescent lamps. Any exposed incandescent lamp that exceeds 25 watts shall not be used on the exterior surface of any sign so as to expose the face of such bulb or lamp to any public street or public right-of-way with the exception of electronic information signs. Signs 18.435-9 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.2 18.435.085 Sign Measurement A. Projecting and freestanding signs. 1. The area of a freestanding or projecting sign shall include all sign faces counted in calculating its area.Regardless of the number of sign cabinets or sign faces,the total allowable area shall not be exceeded. 2. The area of the sign shall be measured as follows: a. The area around and enclosing the perimeter of each sign cabinet, face, or module shall be summed and then totaled to determine total area. The perimeter of measurable area shall not include embellishments such as pole covers, framing and decorative roofing, provided there is no written advertising copy,symbols or logos on such embellishments; b. If the sign is composed of more than two sign cabinets, faces, or modules, the area enclosing the entire perimeter of all cabinets, faces, or modules within a single, continuous geometric figure shall be the area of the sign. Pole covers and other embellishments shall not be included in the area of the sign measurement if they do not bear written advertising copy, symbols or logos;and c. The overall height of a freestanding sign or sign structure is measured from the grade directly below the sign to the highest point of the sign or sign structure and shall include architectural and structural embellishments. B. Wall signs. 1. The area of the sign shall be measured as follows: a. The area around and enclosing the perimeter of each sign cabinet, face, or module shall be summed and then totaled to determine total area. The perimeter of measurable area shall not include embellishments such as pole covers, framing and decorative roofing, provided there is no written advertising copy,symbols or logos on such embellishments; b. If the sign is composed of individual letters or symbols using the wall as the background with or without added decoration, the total sign area shall be calculated by measuring the area within the perimeter of all symbols and letters or other decoration including logos;and c. Measurement of the wall area pertaining to flush pitched "roof' signs shall be calculated as if the sign were mounted directly on the wall face immediately below the sign. C. Awning Signs. 1. If an awning sign meets the definition of a wall sign as provided in Subsection 18.435.015.A., it shall be measured as a wall sign as described in Subsection 18.435.085.B above as if the sign were mounted directly on the building face. 2. If an awning sign meets the definition of a projecting sign, it shall be measured as a projecting sign as described in Subsection 18.435.085.A above. Signs 18.435-10 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.2 18.435.090 Special Condition Signs A. Applicability. Special condition signs have special or unique dimensional, locational, illumination, maximum number or other requirements imposed upon them in addition to the regulations contained in this chapter. B. Bench signs. 1. Bench signs shall only be allowed at designated transit stops in commercial, industrial, R-12, R- 25,and R-40 zones where no bus shelter exists: a. No more than 1 bench sign shall be allowed per transit stop; b. Placement of the bench sign shall not interfere with pedestrian traffic or be located within a vision clearance area or a public right-of-way except where approved by the city engineer; c. Application for a bench sign shall include the signature of the property owner, proof of liability insurance, and any required permits from the state highway division or Washington County,where applicable;and d. The sign area shall be limited to a total of 14 square feet. C. Electronic information signs. 1. Electronic information signs shall be allowed only in the C-G,MUC,TMU, and MU-CBD zones, and at schools that front an arterial street where the sign is not less than 200 feet from an abutting residential use and is oriented to the arterial street. 2. The standards for electronic information signs in TMU and MU-CBD zones are provided in Subsection 18.435.130.H.l.a. 3. The standards for electronic information signs in all other zones and for schools are provided below. a. The maximum height and area of an electronic information sign shall be as provided in Section 18.435.130 and any other applicable standards of this title; b. Electronic information signs shall not be allowed to substitute for a nonconforming sign or mounted upon a nonconforming sign or sign structure, unless the sign and sign structure are brought into compliance with all of the provisions of this title; c. An electronic information sign may be allowed to substitute for 1 freestanding sign or 1 wall sign except in the MUC zone where an electronic information sign may only be substituted for 1 freestanding sign and no other sign type. An electronic information sign shall not be allowed to substitute for any other sign type, and shall not be allowed to replace or supplement a billboard, freeway-oriented sign, or any other sign type other than those specifically allowed above; d. 1 electronic information sign shall be allowed per premises; and Signs 18.435-I1 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.2 e. With regard to light patterns: i. Traveling light patterns("chaser effect")are prohibited,and ii. Messages and animation shall be displayed at intervals of greater than two seconds in duration. D. Freestanding freeway-oriented signs. 1. For signs requiring a permit under the Oregon Motorist Information Act, the city will determine through a Type I procedure whether the sign meets all applicable city standards and provide that determination to any applicant for a state permit consistent with ORS 377.723. 2. Freeway-oriented signs shall only be allowed in the C-G,TMU,I-P, I-L and I-H zones. 3. Freeway-oriented signs shall be located within 200 feet of Highway 217 or Interstate 5 rights-of- way. 4. 1 freeway-oriented sign shall be allowed per premises. 5. The maximum height of a freeway-oriented sign shall not exceed 35 feet from the ground level at its base. 6. The maximum sign area of a freeway-oriented sign shall not exceed 160 square feet per face or 320 square feet for all faces. 7. Freeway-oriented signs shall be oriented to be viewed from the freeway. 8. In addition to a freeway-oriented sign, each parcel, development complex, or premises shall be allowed 1 freestanding sign provided all other provisions of this chapter can be met and both signs are located on separate frontages with different orientations. 9. Freeway-oriented signs are only allowed as freestanding signs and are not allowed as any other sign type. E. Awning signs. 1. Awning signs shall be allowed in all base zones. Regardless of how an awning sign is measured, as provided in Subsection 18.435.085.0, the total awning sign area counts toward the total wall sign area allowance as provided in the applicable base zone sign regulations in Section 18.435.130,except for awning signs in the TMU and MU-CBD zones.The total awning sign area in these zones counts toward the total projecting sign area allowance as provided in Subsection 18.435.130.H.4. 2. The standards for awning signs in TMU and MU-CBD zones are provided in Subsection 18.435.130.H.4. 3. The standards for awning signs in all other zones are provided below. Signs 18.435-12 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.2 a. The copy on awning signs shall not extend above the upper surfaces of the awning structure. They may be hung below the awning if the sign clears the sidewalk by at least 8.5 feet; b. Awning signs may be internally or externally illuminated; and c. Where approved by the city engineer, awning signs may extend into the public right-of-way 6.5 feet or 2/3 of the distance to the roadway, whichever is less. However, no sign shall extend within 2 feet of the nearest vehicle travel lane. F. Flush pitched"roof' signs. 1. Flush pitched roof signs shall be allowed in all base zones except residential zones; 2. Flush pitched roof signs shall not extend more than 6 inches above the roof line; 3. Flush pitched roof signs shall be parallel to the building face and shall not extend beyond the sides of the building face; 4. Flush pitched roof signs shall only be attached to a mansard or other near vertical roof where the roof angle is greater than 45°from horizontal;and 5. Flush pitched roof signs are a type of wall sign, and all code provisions applicable to wall signs apply to this type of sign. G. Painted wall signs. Wall signs, including symbols or logos, which are painted directly onto the wall surface shall not exceed in gross wall area the percentage allowed for a wall sign in the applicable base zone. H. Entryway signs. Entryway signs shall be allowed in all base zones. I. Cultural institution auxiliary signs. 1. Cultural institution auxiliary signs shall be allowed in all base zones. 2. Cultural institution auxiliary signs are limited to 1 sign and shall be either within the same sign structure as another freestanding sign on the property where the cultural institution is located or on a wall of the primary building of the cultural institution. A wall sign shall be consistent in structure and materials with any existing wall sign on the cultural institution. The sign area of a cultural institution auxiliary sign shall not exceed 4 square feet per face. (Ord. 10-04 §1; Ord. 06- 13,Ord. 06-09,Ord.04-03) 18.435.100 Temporary Signs A. Applicability. All temporary signs listed in Subsection 18.435.015.A.46 require a temporary sign permit except for the following: 1. Lawn and A-frame signs in residential zones exempted by Section 18.435.060. 2. A-frame signs in MU-CBD and TMU zones allowed by Subsection 18.435.130.H.6. Signs 18.435-13 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.2 B. Expiration. 1. A temporary sign permit shall be issued for a period of 30 days or less. The approval authority may attach conditions to the permit as necessary to ensure discontinuance of the use of the sign; and 2. A temporary sign permit may be reissued by the approval authority for 2 additional periods of 30 days each per calendar year,except for balloon sign permits which may not be reissued. C. Standards for all temporary signs, except balloon signs, that require a temporary sign permit by Subsection 18.435.100.A above are as follows: 1. A maximum of 1 temporary sign may be allowed at a time for each owner or occupant of property or building; 2. The total area of a temporary sign shall not exceed 24 square feet for all faces or 12 square feet per face,except for banners which shall not exceed 24 square feet per sign face; 3. Temporary signs shall be located on private property; 4. Temporary signs shall not be located in the public right-of-way or the clear vision area as described in Chapter 18.930, Vision Clearance Areas,except for banners that may be hung across the right-of-way where approved by the city engineer; 5. Temporary signs shall not be illuminated in any way or utilize electrical wiring; 6. Temporary signs shall not contain a reader-board or electronic information sign component;and 7. Temporary signs shall not be permanently attached to the ground,buildings,or other structures. D. Standards for balloon signs that require a temporary sign permit by Subsection 18.435.100.A above are as follows: 1. A maximum of 1 stationary balloon or cluster of children's balloons may be allowed per calendar year for each owner or occupant of property or building; 2. A balloon sign may remain in place for a maximum of 10 days per calendar year; 3. A balloon sign may be allowed as a roof sign; 4. A balloon sign shall not exceed 25 feet in height or float in the air higher than 25 feet above the nearest building's roof line;and 5. A balloon sign shall be secured to a structure or the ground. 18.435.110 Nonconforming Signs A. Applicability.For the purposes of this chapter,non-conforming signs will be defined as follows: 1. Except as provided in this chapter, signs in existence on March 20, 1978, in compliance with Signs 18.435-14 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.2 Ordinance Nos. 77-89 and 78-16,which do not conform to the provisions of this chapter,but that were constructed, erected or maintained in compliance with all previous regulations, shall be regarded as nonconforming signs that may be continued until March 20, 1988. 2. Signs in existence on January 11, 1971, which do not conform to the provisions of this chapter, but that were constructed,erected or maintained in compliance with all previous regulations,were regarded as nonconforming signs and could be continued for a period of 10 years from January 11, 1971. All such signs that were not brought into compliance with the standards in Ordinance Nos.77-89 and 78-16 and the extensions granted,are now in violation of this chapter. 3. Signs located on premises annexed into the city after January 11, 1971,which do not comply with the provisions of this chapter, shall be brought into compliance with this chapter within a period of 10 years after the effective date of the annexation. 4. Any sign that is structurally altered, relocated or replaced shall immediately be brought into compliance with all of the provisions of this chapter,except the repairing and restoration of a sign on site or away from the site to a safe condition. Any part of a sign or sign structure for normal maintenance shall be permitted without loss of nonconforming status. B. Restrictions. For purposes of this chapter, a sign face or message change shall be subject to the following provisions: 1. A sign face or message change on a nonconforming sign is not allowed as an alteration when the affected property and sign structure have been abandoned for greater than 90 days; 2. A sign face or message change shall be allowed as an alteration only for existing conforming signs and for nonconforming signs prior to their amortization expiration date;and 3. No sign permit shall be required for allowable sign face or message changes. C. Reconstruction. Should a nonconforming sign or sign structure or nonconforming portion of structure be destroyed or repaired by any means to an extent of more than 50 percent of its replacement cost,it shall not be reconstructed except in conformity with the provisions of this chapter. D. Requirements for conformance. Signs in existence on the effective date of this chapter that do not comply with provisions regulating flashing signs; use of par spotlights or rotating beacons; rotating and revolving signs; flags, banners, streamers, or strings of lights, or temporary or incidental signs; shall be made to conform within 90 days from the effective date of this chapter. (Ord.04-03) 18.435.120 Removal of Nonconforming and/or Abandoned Signs A. Conformance required. All signs erected after the effective date of this title,which are in violation of any provisions of this chapter, shall be removed or brought into conformance upon written notice by the director. B. Removal. All signs that do not comply with this chapter, but were erected prior to the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter, shall be removed or brought into conformance within 60 days from written notice by certified mail given by the director. Signs 18.435-15 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.2 C. Enforcement. If the owner of sign, building, structure or premises fails to comply with the written order, the director may then cite the owner into court subject to Chapter 18.20, Administration and Enforcement.The following exceptions apply: 1. Section 18.435.110 provides for certain time limits and other conditions for certain signs as described therein. 2. Any sign that by its condition or location presents an immediate or serious danger to the public, by order of the building official,shall be removed or repaired within the time the building official specifies. In the event the owner of such sign cannot be found or refuses to comply with the order to remove, the building official shall then have the dangerous sign removed and the owner cited for noncompliance and recovery of any damage or expense. D. Responsible party for removal. Any person who owns or leases a nonconforming or abandoned sign or sign structure shall remove such sign and sign structure when the expiration of the amortization period for the sign(s)as provided in Section 18.435.110 has occurred or the sign has been abandoned: 1. If the person who owns or leases such sign fails to remove it as provided in this section, the director shall give the owner of the building, structure or premises upon which such sign is located,60 days' written notice to remove it; 2. If the sign has not been removed at the expiration of the 60 days' written notice,the director may remove such sign at cost to the owner of the building,structure or premises; 3. Signs that are in full compliance with sign regulations,which the successor to a person's business agrees to maintain as provided in this chapter, need not be removed in compliance with this section; and 4. Costs incurred by the city due to removal, may be made a lien against the land or premises on which such sign is located, after notice and hearing, and may be collected or foreclosed in the same manner as liens otherwise entered in the liens docket of the city. 18.435.130 Base Zone Regulations A. R-7,R-4.5, R-3.5, R-2 and R-1 zones.No sign shall be allowed in the R-7, R-4.5, R-3.5, R-2, or R-1 zone except the following: 1. Wall sign(s)shall not exceed a combined total area of 4 square feet; 2. Every housing complex shall be allowed 1 permanent freestanding sign at each entry point to the housing complex from the public right-of-way, with the site properly landscaped, and not exceeding 32 square feet per face in area. Illumination may be approved provided it does not create a public or private nuisance, as determined by the director considering the purpose of the zone; 3. Every platted subdivision shall be allowed 1 permanent, freestanding sign at each entry point to the subdivision from the public right-of-way,with the site properly landscaped and not exceeding 32 square feet per face in area. Illumination may be approved provided it does not create a public or private nuisance,as determined by the director considering the purpose of the zone; Signs 18.435-16 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.2 4, For nonresidential uses, 1 illuminated or non-illuminated freestanding sign not exceeding 6 feet in height and 32 square feet in area per sign face for uses approved through the site development review or conditional use process shall be allowed. Wall signs shall not exceed 5 percent of the gross area of the wall face on which the sign is mounted; 5. Directional signs on private property when such signs are solely designed to identify driveway entrances and exits for motorists on adjoining public streets shall be allowed. 1 sign with an area of 4 square feet per face shall be allowed per driveway. Such signs shall be consistent with Chapter 18.930,Vision Clearance Areas; 6. Temporary signs in compliance with Sections 18.435.090 and 18.435.100; 7. Lawn signs in compliance with Subsections 18.435.060.A.1,A.6,and B.2; 8. Special condition signs in compliance with Section 18.435.090; and 9. Additional allowed signs include awning sign(s)and painted wall sign(s). B. R-12, R-25 and R-40 zones.No sign shall be allowed in the R-12, R-25, or R-40 zone except for the following: 1. Wall sign(s)shall not exceed a combined total area of 1 square foot per dwelling unit; 2. Every housing complex shall be allowed 1 permanent freestanding sign at each entry point to the housing complex from the public right-of-way, with the site properly landscaped and not exceeding 32 square feet in area per sign face. Illumination may be approved provided it does not create a public or private nuisance, as determined by the director considering the purpose of the zone; 3. Every platted subdivision shall be allowed 1 permanent freestanding sign at each entry point to the subdivision from the public right-of-way, with the site properly landscaped, and not exceeding 32 square feet in area per sign face. Illumination may be approved provided it does not create a public or private nuisance, as determined by the director considering the purpose of the zone; 4. For nonresidential uses, 1 illuminated or non-illuminated freestanding sign not exceeding 6 feet in height and 32 square feet in area per sign face for uses approved through the site development review or conditional use process shall be allowed. Wall signs shall not exceed 5 percent of the gross area of the wall face on which the sign is mounted; 5. Directional signs on private property when such signs are solely designed to identify driveway entrances and exits for motorists on adjoining public streets shall be allowed. 1 sign with an area of 4 square feet per face shall be allowed per driveway. Such signs shall be consistent with Chapter 18.930,Vision Clearance Areas; 6. Temporary signs in compliance with Sections 18.435.090 and 18.435.100; 7. Lawn signs in compliance with Subsections 18.435.060.A.1,A.6,and B.2; 8. Special condition signs in compliance with Section 18.435.090; and Signs 18.435-17 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.2 9. Additional allowed signs include awning sign(s)and painted wall sign(s). C. C-G zone.No sign shall be allowed in the C-G zone except for the following: 1. Freestanding signs are subject to the following limitations and conditions: a. 1 multi-faced,freestanding sign shall be allowed, b. A reader-board assembly may be an integral part of the freestanding sign, c. The maximum square footage of signs shall be 70 square feet per face or a total of 140 square feet for all sign faces. No part of any freestanding sign shall extend over a property line into the public right-of-way, d. The sign area may be increased 1 square foot for each lineal foot the sign is moved back from the front property line to which the sign is adjacent. If the street is curbed and paved, the measurement shall be taken from a point that is 15 feet from the pavement. This increase in sign area is limited to a maximum of 90 square feet per face or a total of 180 square feet for all faces,and e. Freestanding signs located next to the public right-of-way shall not exceed 20 feet in height. Height may be increased 1 foot in height for each 10 feet of setback from the property line or a point 15 feet from the edge of pavement, whichever is less, to a maximum of 22 feet in height; 2. Wall signs. a. Wall signs, including illuminated reader-boards, may be erected or maintained but shall not exceed in gross area 15 percent of any building face on which the sign is to be mounted, b. Wall signs shall not project more than 18 inches from the wall or extend above the wall to which they are attached,and c. If it is determined through the site development review process that the wall sign's visual appeal and overall design quality would be served, an additional 50 percent of the sign area may be allowed. No copy shall be allowed, however, in the additional area. For purposes of this subsection, "copy"includes symbols,logos, and letters; 3. Directional signs on private property when such signs are solely designed to identify driveway entrances and exits for motorists on adjoining public streets. 1 sign with an area of 4 square feet per face shall be allowed per driveway. Such signs shall be consistent with Chapter 18.930, Vision Clearance Areas; 4. Electronic information signs in compliance with Subsection 18.435.090.C; 5. Temporary signs in compliance with Sections 18.435.090 and 18.435.100; 6. Lawn signs in compliance with Subsections 18.435.060.A.6 and B.2; 7. Special condition signs in compliance with Section 18.435.090;and Signs 18.435-18 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.2 8. Additional allowed signs include awning sign(s), flush pitched "roof' sign(s), freeway-oriented sign(s),projecting sign(s),and painted wall sign(s). D. C-P zone.No sign shall be allowed in the C-P zone except for the following: 1. Freestanding signs are subject to the following limitations and conditions: a. 1 multi-faced freestanding sign shall be allowed per premises, b. A reader-board assembly may be an integral part of the freestanding sign, c. The maximum square footage of freestanding signs shall be 32 square feet per face or a total of 64 square feet for all sign faces. No part of any freestanding sign shall extend over a property line into the public right-of-way, d. The sign area may be increased 1 square foot for each lineal foot the sign is moved back from the front property line to which the sign is adjacent. If the street is curbed and paved the measurement shall be taken from a point that is 15 feet from the pavement. This increase in sign area is limited to a maximum of 52 square feet per face or a total of 104 square feet for all faces,and e. Freestanding signs located next to the public right-of-way shall not exceed 8 feet in height. Height may be increased 1 foot in height for each 10 feet of setback from the property line or a point 15 feet from the edge of pavement, whichever is less, to a maximum of 10 feet in height; 2. Wall signs are subject to the following limitations and conditions: a. Wall signs, including illuminated reader-board signs, may be erected or maintained but shall not exceed 5 percent in gross area of any wall face on which the sign is to be mounted, b. Wall signs shall be parallel to the face of the building upon which the sign is located,and c. If it is determined through the site development review process that the wall sign's visual appeal and overall design quality would be served, an additional 50 percent of the allowable sign area may be allowed. No copy shall be allowed, however, in the additional area. For purposes of this subsection,"copy"includes symbols, logos and letters; 3. Directional signs on private property when such signs are solely designed to identify driveway entrances and exits for motorists on adjoining public streets. 1 sign with an area of 4 square feet per face shall be allowed per driveway. Such signs shall be consistent with Chapter 18.930, Vision Clearance Areas; 4. Temporary signs in compliance with Sections 18.435.090 and 18.435.100; 5. Lawn signs in compliance with Subsections 18.435.060.A.6 and B.2; 6. Special condition signs in compliance with Section 18.435.090; and Signs 18.435-19 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.2 7. Additional allowed signs include awning sign(s), flush pitched "roof' sign(s) and painted wall sign(s). E. C-N and C-C zones.No sign shall be allowed in the C-N and C-C zones except for the following: 1. Freestanding signs are subject to the following limitations and conditions: a. 1 multi-faced freestanding sign shall be allowed per premises, b. A reader-board assembly may be an integral part of the freestanding sign, c. The maximum square footage of freestanding signs shall be 32 square feet per face or a total of 64 square feet for all sign faces. No part of any freestanding sign shall extend over a property line into the public right-of-way, d. The sign area may be increased 1 square foot for each lineal foot the sign is moved back from the front property line to which the sign is adjacent. If the street is curbed and paved the measurement shall be taken from a point that is 15 feet from the pavement. This increase in sign area is limited to a maximum of 52 square feet per face or a total of 104 square feet for all faces,and e. Freestanding signs located next to the public right-of-way shall not exceed 20 feet in height. Height may be increased 1 foot in height for each 10 feet of setback from the property line or a point 15 feet from the edge of pavement, whichever is less, to a maximum of 22 feet in height; 2. Wall signs are subject to the following limitations and conditions: a. Wall signs, including illuminated reader-board signs,may be erected or maintained but shall not exceed in gross area 10 percent of any building face on which the sign is to be mounted, b. Wall signs shall be parallel to the face of the building upon which the sign is located,and c. If it is determined through the site development review process that the wall sign's visual appeal and overall design quality would be served, an additional 50 percent of the sign area may be allowed. No copy shall be allowed, however, in the additional area. For purposes of this subsection,"copy"includes symbols, logos and letters; 3. Directional signs on private property when such signs are solely designed to identify driveway entrances and exits for motorists on adjoining public streets. 1 sign with an area of 4 square feet per face shall be allowed per driveway. Such signs shall be consistent with Chapter 18.930, Vision Clearance Areas; 4. Temporary signs in compliance with Sections 18.435.090 and 18.435.100; 5. Lawn signs in compliance with Subsections 18.435.060.A.6 and B.2; 6. Special condition signs in compliance with Section 18.435.090; and Signs 18.435-20 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.2 7. Additional allowed signs include awning sign(s), flush pitched "roof' sign(s), and painted wall sign(s). F. Industrial zones.No sign shall be allowed in the I-P,I-L,or I-H zone except for the following: 1. Freestanding signs are subject to the following limitations and conditions: a. 1 multi-faced freestanding sign shall be allowed, b. A reader-board assembly may be an integral part of the freestanding sign, c. The maximum square footage of signs shall be 70 square feet per face or a total of 140 square feet for all sign faces. No part of any freestanding sign shall extend over a property line into the public right-of-way, d. The sign area may be increased 1 square foot for each lineal foot the sign is moved back from the front property line to which the sign is adjacent. If the street is curbed and paved, the measurement shall be taken from a point that is 15 feet from the pavement. This increase in sign area is limited to a maximum of 90 square feet per face or a total of 180 square feet for all faces,and e. Freestanding signs located next to the public right-of-way shall not exceed 20 feet in height. Height may be increased 1 foot in height for each 10 feet of setback from the property line or a point 15 feet from the edge of pavement, whichever is less, to a maximum of 22 feet in height; 2. Wall signs are subject to the following limitations and conditions: a. Wall signs, including illuminated reader-board signs, may be erected or maintained but shall not exceed in gross area 15 percent of any building face on which the sign is to be mounted, b. Wall signs shall not project more than 18 inches from the wall or extend above the wall to which they are attached,and c. If it is determined through the site development review process that the wall sign's visual appeal and overall design quality would be served, an additional 50 percent of the sign area may be allowed. No copy shall be allowed, however, in the additional area. For purposes of this subsection, "copy" includes symbols,logos and letters; 3. Directional signs on private property when such signs are solely designed to identify driveway entrances and exits for motorists on adjoining public streets. 1 sign with an area of 4 square feet per face shall be allowed per driveway. Such signs shall be consistent with Chapter 18.930, Vision Clearance Areas; 4. Temporary signs in compliance with Sections 18.435.090 and 18.435.100; 5. Lawn signs in compliance with Subsections 18.435.060.A.6 and B.2; 6. Special condition signs in compliance with Section 18.435.090; and Signs 18.435-21 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.2 7. Additional allowed signs include awning sign(s), freeway-oriented sign(s), projecting sign(s), flush pitched"roof'sign(s),and painted wall sign(s). G. Additional requirements in commercial and industrial zones, except signs subject to Subsection 18.435.130.H below. If it is determined through the site development review process that the sign's visual appeal and overall design quality would be served while maintaining the intent and purpose of this chapter,an additional 50 percent of the allowable sign area and 25 percent of sign height may be allowed.No copy shall be allowed in the additional area or height. For purposes of this subsection the word"copy"includes symbols,logos and figures,as well as letters. 1. Each freestanding sign shall be surrounded by an area set aside to protect the sign from vehicles maneuvering on the site and the area set aside shall be landscaped. a. The required site plan shall show the size and shape of the area set aside for the sign and the landscaping and shall be subject to review by the approval authority; and b. On existing sites where a landscaped area is not feasible, the minimum clearance between the lowest portion of a freestanding sign and the ground shall be 14 feet in any vehicle maneuvering area. 2. No freestanding sign, nor any portion of any freestanding sign, shall be located or project over any portion of a street, sidewalk or other public right-of-way or property unless an exception has been granted. 3. When a premises contains more than a single tenant but is not defined as a shopping center, the provisions of a freestanding sign shall take into consideration the need for providing a signing system that is harmonious in appearance and legible: a. The building owner shall provide, at the owner's expense, a common support for all tenant signage; and b. Up to an additional 50 percent of sign copy area may be allowed through the site development review process so as to adequately identify the separate tenants when determined that the increased sign area will not be inconsistent with the purpose of this chapter. 4. Shopping centers or industrial parks shall establish a single signing format: a. Up to an additional 50 percent of sign area may be allowed through the site development review process to adequately identify the complex when it can be determined that the increased sign area will not be inconsistent with the purposes of this chapter; b. This increase should be judged according to unique identification needs and circumstances that necessitate additional area to make the sign sufficiently legible; and c. When a shopping center or industrial park has more than 1 main entrance on separate frontages, a second freestanding sign may be allowed through the site development review process.The 2 allowable signs shall face separate frontages and are not intended to be viewed simultaneously. Signs 18.435-22 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.2 5. Legal owners or occupants of properties or buildings that are in shopping plazas and are directly located,or proposed to be located, on a commercially-and industrially-zoned corner property(ies) (one or more contiguous tax lots located at the intersection of two or more public streets),shall be allowed to have 1 freestanding sign along each street frontage when all of the following are met: a. A sign permit shall be required for each sign prior to its erection; b. The total combined height of 2 freestanding signs on the premises shall not exceed 150 percent of what is normally allowed for 1 freestanding sign in the same base zone; c. Neither of the signs shall exceed the sign height normally allowed in the base zone in which the signs are located; d. No more than 2 freestanding signs shall be allowed; e. The 2 allowable signs shall face separate frontages and are not intended to be viewed simultaneously;and f. All other provisions of this chapter apply. 6. Shopping centers in the C-G zone shall be entitled to freestanding signage according to the following optional standards: a. A maximum of 2 freestanding signs shall be allowed per street frontage provided they can meet both sign area and sign height requirements as provided in this subsection; b. The total combined height of both signs shall not exceed 150 percent of the sign height normally allowed for 1 freestanding sign in the same base zone; however, neither shall exceed the height normally allowed in the same base zone; c. The total combined sign area of both signs shall not exceed 150 percent of what is normally allowed for one freestanding sign in the same base zone; however, neither shall exceed the area normally allowed in the same base zone; d. Neither sign shall pose a vision clearance problem or project into the public right-of-way;and e. A sign permit shall be required prior to erection of any freestanding sign referred to in this subsection. (Ord. 10-02 §2; Ord. 09-13) H. MU-CBD and TMU zones. The following signs are allowed in the TMU zone and the MU-CBD zone, except that MU-CBD properties with a Planned Development (PD) designation are subject to the residential zone sign standards in Subsection 18.435.130.B and MU-CBD properties north of Pacific Highway or with frontage on Pacific Highway or Hall Boulevard are subject to the C-G zone sign standards in Subsection 18.435.130.C. 1. General provisions. a. Reader-board and electronic information signs are allowed as follows: Signs 18.435-23 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.2 i. A freestanding sign,window sign,wall sign,or projecting sign may include a reader- board or electronic information sign component. ii. If a wall or projecting sign includes such a component,the reader-board or electronic information component shall be limited in size to 50 square feet or 50 percent of the area of the wall or projecting sign,whichever is less. iii. Messages and animation shall be displayed at intervals of greater than two seconds in duration.Traveling light patterns("chaser effect")shall be prohibited. b. Sign lighting methods are allowed as follows: i. In addition to the sign lighting methods described in Subsection 18.435.015.A.25, backlighting is allowed as a type of indirect or external lighting where the light source is behind an opaque sign area and not directly visible from the front of the sign. ii. All signs may use indirect or external lighting.All indirect or external sign lighting shall be shielded,angled,or located such that it does not shine directly onto adjacent properties or public rights-of-way. Signs larger than 100 square feet that use indirect or external lighting shall also have shields with a cutoff angle of 90 degrees or greater to ensure that lighting is not directed upward. iii. Only wall signs,window signs,or pedestrian-oriented roof signs may use internal lighting. iv. No sign shall use direct lighting,except for electronic information signs and signs with neon tubes or comparable lighting tubes. c. Wall signs,projecting signs,and A-frame signs may project into or be located in City of Tigard public right-of-way as provided in Subsection 18.435.130.H below. Any sign that projects into the City of Tigard right-of-way is subject to approval by the city engineer.No sign shall project into or be located in Oregon Department of Transportation right-of-way. d. Signs on fences,retaining walls,or walls serving the same purpose as a fence are prohibited except where specifically designed as entryway signs. 2. Freestanding signs, but not including freestanding freeway-oriented signs that are allowed as a special condition sign by Subsection 18.435.130.H.8. a. One multi-faced freestanding sign is allowed per premises.A premises with more than one street frontage may have one sign per frontage. b. The maximum sign area shall be 32 square feet per sign face or 64 square feet for all sign faces.The maximum sign height shall be 3.5 feet,except for freestanding signs associated with a public multi-use trail which shall have a maximum sign height of 8 feet. c. A freestanding sign may be located in the minimum building setback but shall not be located in the public right-of-way or the clear vision area as described in Chapter 18.930. 3. Wall signs,including painted wall signs and flush pitched roof signs. Signs 18.435-24 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.2 a. Multiple wall signs are allowed per building face. b. The total maximum sign area shall not exceed 15 percent of the gross area of the building face.The maximum sign height shall be equal to the height of the building face and shall not extend above the building face, except for flush pitched roof signs which are subject to the height standards in Subsection 18.435.090.F.The maximum horizontal projection shall be 18 inches. c. A wall sign may project into the minimum building setback and public right-of-way.The minimum vertical clearance for wall signs that project into the public right-of-way shall be 10 feet from sidewalk grade. 4. Projecting signs,including awning signs. a. One projecting sign is allowed per building.A building with more than one street frontage may have one sign per frontage. The maximum sign area shall be 32 square feet per sign face or 64 square feet for all sign faces.A building with more than one street frontage may have one sign on the building corner at the intersection of two street frontages in lieu of one sign per frontage.The maximum sign area for a corner projecting sign shall be 50 square feet per sign face or 100 square feet for all sign faces. b. A building may have the following additional projecting signs: i. A building may have one or more additional awning signs where awnings are provided on the building face that project at least 4 feet into the public right-of-way and occupy at least 50 percent of the width of the building face.The additional signage shall not exceed 32 square feet in size. ii. A building may have one or more additional projecting signs where the signs are perpendicular to the building face,less than 4.5 square feet in size per sign face,and located less than 10 feet from sidewalk grade as measured from the top of sign.The number of additional signs shall not exceed the number of ground floor tenant spaces in the building. c. A projecting sign may project into the minimum building setback and public right-of-way. For signs that project into the right-of-way,the minimum vertical clearance for awning signs and signs less than 4.5 square feet in size per sign face shall be 8 feet from sidewalk grade. The minimum vertical clearance for all other projecting signs shall be 10 feet from sidewalk grade.The maximum horizontal projection into the right-of-way shall be 6 feet or the minimum sidewalk width along the building frontage,whichever is less.A projecting sign shall not conflict with an existing or planned street tree. 5. Pedestrian-oriented roof signs. a. A pedestrian-oriented roof sign is allowed only on buildings with a height of 20 feet or less. b. The maximum number of signs allowed shall be equal to the number of ground floor tenant spaces in the building. Signs 18.435-25 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.2 c. The maximum sign area shall be 45 square feet. The maximum sign height shall be two feet above the roof line of the building and shall not extend below the roof line of the building. d. The sign shall be oriented to the street upon which the building fronts. 6. A-frame signs. a. The maximum number of A-frame signs allowed shall be equal to the number of ground floor tenant spaces in the building or the equivalent of one sign for every 30 linear feet of street- facing building facade,whichever is greater. b. The maximum sign area shall be 6 square feet per sign face or 12 square feet for all sign faces. The maximum sign width and height shall be 3 feet. c. An A-frame sign may be located on private property or in the public right-of-way adjacent to any premises by the person in control of those premises. Where the sign is located in the right-of-way,it shall be located so as to maintain a minimum unobstructed sidewalk width of 4 feet for pedestrian through-travel. It shall be located behind the curb or a minimum of 10 feet from the edge of the nearest travel lane where no curb is present. It shall not be located in the clear vision area described in Chapter 18.930 or where it conflicts with the use of any service area,driveway,water quality facility,bicycle parking area,or on-or off-street parking or loading area.It may be located in a landscape strip with approval by the city engineer. d. An A-frame sign shall only be displayed when the sign owner's business is open to the public. 7. Permit exempt signs,such as directional and window signs,are allowed as described in Subsection 18.435.060.A,except that the total maximum sign area of all window signs shall not exceed 25 percent of the gross window area on the building face. 8. Special condition signs,such as bench,cultural institution,entryway,and freeway-oriented signs are allowed as described in Subsection 18.435.090. Freeway-oriented signs are only allowed in the TMU zone adjacent to the Highway 217 or Interstate 5 rights-of-way. 9. Temporary signs,such as balloon,banner,and lawn signs are allowed as described in Subsection 18.435.100,except that A-frame signs are allowed as described in Subsection 18.435.130.H.6. I. Mixed-use zones except MU-CBD and TMU zones. Sign standards for the MUE, MUE-1, MUE-2, MUC, MUC-1, and MUR zones are located in their respective plan districts in Chapters 18.620 and 18.670. 18.435.140 Sign Code Adjustments A. Adjustments. 1. For all signs except those in the TMU zone,the approval authority may grant an adjustment to the requirements of this chapter through a Type I or Type II procedure, as provided in Sections 18.710.050 and 18.710.070,using approval criteria in Subsection 18.790.030.B.6. Signs 18.435-26 Code Update:2017 Exhibit C.2 2. For all signs in the TMU zone, the approval authority may grant an adjustment to the requirements of this chapter through a Type II procedure, as provided in Subsection18.660.040.C.4,using approval criteria in Subsection 18.660.040.C.4.b. B. If an adjustment is granted,the rights thereby given to the applicant continue to exist and to belong to the applicant or any other owner of the land for a period of 1.5 years from the date of final approval: 1. If, at the expiration of 1.5 years from the date of approval, construction of the structure or initiation of the use giving rise to the need for the adjustment has not begun,the rights given by the adjustment approval terminate without further action by the city; and 2. Said rights also terminate at or after the expiration of 1.5 years from approval if, though commenced within 1.5 years,construction ceases and is not resumed within 60 days.(Ord.09-13) Signs 18.435-27 Code Update:2017 Exhibit D FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS This document contains all applicable city,regional,and state provisions that apply to the package of legislative amendments known as the Tigard Triangle Lean Code Phase II amendments (Land Use Files CPA2017-00002,ZON2017-00002,and DCA2017-00004) and describes how each provision is met. A. TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (TITLE 18) Chapter 18.380: Zoning and Text Amendments 18.380.020.A Legislative zoning map and text amendments shall be undertaken by means of a Type IV procedure,as governed by Section 18.309.060.G FINDING: The proposed amendments are being reviewed under the Type IV legislative procedure as set forth in the chapter. This procedure requires public hearings before both the Planning Commission and City Council. Chapter 18.390: Decision-Making Procedures 18.390.020.B.4 Type IV procedures apply to legislative matters.Legislative matters involve the creation,revision,or large-scale implementation of public policy. Type IV matters are considered initially by the Planning Commission with final decisions made by the City Council. FINDING: The proposed amendments were considered by the Planning Commission at a public hearing on November 6,2017. The Planning Commission made a unanimous recommendation to City Council in support of adoption at the conclusion of this hearing. City Council will consider adopting the proposed amendments at a public hearing on December 12, 2017. 18.390.060.G. The recommendation by the Commission and the decision by the Council shall be based on consideration of the following factors: 1. The Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197; 2. Any federal or state statutes or regulations found applicable; 3. Any applicable Metro regulations; 4. Any applicable comprehensive plan policies;and 5. Any applicable provisions of the City's implementing ordinances. FINDING: Findings and conclusions addressing the factors listed above are provided within this report. CONCLUSION: The applicable provisions of the Tigard Community Development Code are met. Findings and Conclusions(CPA2017-00002,ZON2017-00002,ICA2017-00004) PAGE 1 OF 13 Exhibit D B. TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Chapter 1: Citizen Involvement Goal 1.1 Provide citizens,affected agencies,and other jurisdictions the opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning process. FINDING: The proposed amendments are a result of a multi year community planning process effort that began in 2013 with the development of the Tigard Triangle Strategic Plan (1"1 SP). This Ort was guided by a Citizen and TechnicalAdvisory Committee and culminated in the completion of the TTSP in 2015. Following its completion, the city concurrently began work on two TTSP implementation projects, namely the Tigard Triangle Lean Code and the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan. Each project had its own public engagement strategy, but staff took every opportunity to coordinate and create a synergy between the two projects. The proposed amendments are Phase II of the Tigard Triangle Lean Code project.All of the Tigard Triangle Lean Code public engagements are summarized below: • Lean Code Public Drop-In Office Hours(May 23—June 1, 2017) • Lean Code and Urban Renewal Open House(October 20,2016) • Walkability Workshop (April20,2016) • Walkability Survey(March 30—April 31, 2016) • Lean Code Community Workshops(September 14, 15, and 17,2015) • TTSP Citizen Advisory Committee Meetings(September 19 and November 13, 2013; April 2,June 11, September 10, and December 17,2014) Additionally, the proposed sign code amendments for Downtown Tigard were discussed with representatives from the Tigard Downtown Alliance and the Tigard Chamber of Commerce. Goal 1.2 Ensure all citizens have access to: A. opportunities to communicate directly to the City;and B. information on issues in an understandable form. FINDING: In addition to all required public hearing notifications via mail and newspaper and the public engagements described above, staff briefed the City Council and Planning Commission at public meetings throughout Phase I of the project. The city also maintained a project webpage that it updated regularly with project and staff contact information and sent emails to interested parties on a regular basis. The city endeavored to provide all information in an understandable form, and project managers were always on hand to answer questions. Chapter 2: Land Use Planning Goal 2.1 Maintain an up-to-date Comprehensive Plan,implementing regulations and action plans as the legislative basis of Tigard's land use planning program. FINDING: The proposed amendments conform with the policies of Goal 2.1 as follows: Findings and Conclusions(CPA2017-00002,ZON2017-00002,DCA2017-00004) PAGE 2 OF 13 Exhibit D • The Tigard Triangle Strategic Plan establishes a clear polig direction for redevelopment in the Triangle, and the proposed amendments implement these policies by adopting zoning and updating the Transportation System Plan (TSP)consistent with the recently adopted Tigard Triangle Lean Code. Phase I of this project resulted in the adoption of the Lean Code in August 2017. This proposal, Phase II, enables the Lean Code to go into Oct. The Lean Code is a comprehensive set of use, site, building,parking, and transportation regulations that: o Promotes the efficient use of land and intense urban level development in the city's designated regional Town Center through site and building design standards that utilize form-based code principles; o Promotes the development of a range of land uses through the creation of a new Triangle Mixed-Use(TMU) tion;and o Spurs redevelopment by reducing regulations in ways that support the communi'y'c vision. • The Tigard Triangle and Downtown Tigard are planned for higher-density, mixed-use, and pedestrian-oriented development in the Comprehensive Plan. Both areas have outdated sign regulations that are inconsistent with adopted goals and objectives, and the proposed sign code amendments remedy that by reducing or eliminating sign types that are more auto- oriented and allowing sign types that are more pedestrian-oriented. • The city coordinated with all affected jurisdictions and agencies during the development of the proposed amendments, including but not limited to Metro, ODOT, and Washington County. Goal 2.2 To enlarge,improve,and sustain a diverse urban forest to maximize the economic,ecological,and social benefit of trees. FINDING: The Lean Code, which will become effective upon approval of the proposed rezone, identifies the Oregon white oak as the District Tree and provides incentives for preserving a District Tree when it is located near or within the public right-of-way, such as providing for an automatic building setback exception. Goal 2.3 To balance the diverse and changing needs of the City through well-designed urban development that minimizes the loss of existing trees to create a living legacy for future generations. FINDING: The Lean Code, which will become effective upon approval of the proposed rezone, provides disincentives for removing a District Tree,such as an additional process and fee for removal. Chapter 8:Parks,Recreation,Trails,and Open Space Goal 8.2 Create a Citywide network of interconnected on- and off-road pedestrian and bicycle trails. Findings and Conclusions(CPA2017-00002,ZON2017-00002,DCA2017-00004) PAGE 3 OF 13 Exhibit D FINDING: The proposed TSP amendments update Figure 5-12 to be consistent with the Transportation Network Map in the Lean Code. Both maps show a network of interconnected on-and off-road bicycle and pedestrian facilities, including bike lanes and multimodal paths and trails throughout the Triangle. One of the planned trails utilities the Ked Rock Creek corridor. Chapter 9: Economic Development Goal 9.1 Develop and maintain a strong,diversified,and sustainable local economy. FINDING: The Lean Code, which will become effective upon approval of the proposed rezone, is designed to facilitate economic development opportunities by reducing regulatory and financial barriers to small-scale incremental development. The Lean Code is also designed to increase opportunities for higher density housing and employment development through the creation of a new Triangle Mixed-Use zone and the removal of the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) requirement. Both of these regulatory changes complement other economic development strategies at play in the Triangle, namely the newly-approved Urban Renewal Area and the Vertical Housing Development Zone. The proposed Transportation System Plan (TSP)amendments also include the Wall Street extension project on the TSP project list and maps. Wall Street is located in the Hunziker Industrial Core Area. This area includes about 136 acres of industrially zonedproperty located 3/4 of a mile from 1-5 and immediately accessible by existing rail. Ninety-six acres are developed but underutilized Forty-two acres are undeveloped but limited in their development potential due to lack of access and infrastructure. Extension of Wall Street is expected to spur economic development by "unlocking"the development and employment potential of the remaining underdeveloped and undeveloped industrial lands in this area. It was identified as a needed project in the 2014 Hunziker Industrial Core Public Infrastructure Finance Strategy. Goal 9.2 Make Tigard a center and incubator for innovative businesses,including those that focus on environmental sustainability. FINDING: The Lean Code, which will become effective upon approval of the proposed rezone, regulates land uses by category, not by individual use. This approach is well-suited to accommodate an evolving mix of uses and economic activities. The Lean Code also employs a minimalist form-based approach to site and building design that will enable businesses to more easily adapt their buildings and sites to suit their changing business needs. Goal 9.3 Make Tigard a prosperous and desirable place to live and do business. FINDING: The Lean Code, which will become effective upon approval of the proposed rezone, is designed to accommodate new businesses and high-density housing in ways that supports the community s vision for livability and walkability. The Lean Code is also designed to support existing businesses, even those that don't conform to the new use standards. A minor relaxation of the Lean Code's prohibition on the expansion of non-conforming businesses is also included with this proposal because Landmark Ford was concerned about the Findings and Conclusions(CPA2017-00002,7.012017-00002,DCA2017-00004) PAGl:4 OF 13 Exhibit D impacts to their business with the proposed rezoning of their propertyfrom general commercial to mixed-use development. The cityfinds that it is better to allow for a small potential future expansion of Landmark Ford along the eastern boundary of the Triangle, i.e. along Interstate 5, than to retain the general commercial zoning on the entire property. This compromise maintains the integrity of the community's long-term vision for this area to become a vibrant mixed-use area while acknowledging and supporting the contribution that Landmark Ford has made and continues to make to the Tigard economy and community. Chapter 10: Housing Goal 10.1 Provide opportunities for a variety of housing types to meet the diverse housing needs of current and future City residents. FINDING: The city conducted an analysis of housing needs and capacity in 2012 as part of an update to Chapter 10 of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. This analysis found the capacity to build 6,714 units on 600 acres throughout the city. The analysis also found that 6,545 new units were needed by 2032. Once the types of needed housing were compared with the inventory of buildable lands, the capacity dropped to 6,457, a shortfall of 88 units. However, these figures only included lands within Residential(R-1 through R-25)and Mixed-Use Residential (MUR-1 and MUR-2)tions. The reason for excluding buildable lands in the MU-CBD zone (existing Downtown Tigard toning)and MUE zone (existing Tigard Triangle zoning) was their lack of dedicated residential zoning. Once the capacityfor residential development in the MU-CBD and MUE zones were factored into the equation, the 2012 analysis found that there was more than sufficient supply for the next 20 years. Downtown Tigard alone was found to have the capacity to accommodate 2,000 additional units. Since the time of the 2012 analysis, one mixed-use development project (Attwell Off Main)has added 300 units to the MU-CBD tion, more than covering the identified 88-unit shortfall within strictly residential zones. Additionally, the Lean Code created a new Triangle Mixed-Use (TMU)tion that outright allows all housing types and reduces the requirements for new accessory dwelling units. The Lean Code, which will become effective upon approval of the proposed rezone, replaces the existing Mixed-Use Employment(MUE)zone in the Tigard Triangle with the new TMU tion. The size of the new TMU zone, as compared to the existing MUE zone, is also proposed to increase by roughly 60 acres by rezoning 27 parcels to TMU that are currently zoned General Commercial(C-G). Both existing MUE and C-G zones do not outright allow any residential uses. The 2014 Tigard Triangle Development Feasibility Analysis Report estimated the average residential densityfor the new TMU zone based on anticipated development typologies. This analysis was further refined in the 2017 draft of the Tigard Triangle Trip Generation Analysis. Potential net buildable area was calculated using a GIS scenario planning tool that factored in land constraints,floor area ratios, building heights, and lot coverages. This analysis, when paired with the average densities estimated by the 2014 analysis, resulted in an increase in residential capacity within the new TMU zone. These figures are reported below. Findings and Conclusions(CPA2017-00002,ZON2017-00002,1CA2017-00004) PAGE 5 OF 13 Exhibit D Tigard Triangle Buildable Area (in sq.ft.) Potential New Scenarios Gross Area I Net Area Dwelling Units Existing MUE Zoning 8,508,713 5,944,829 1,326 Proposed TMU 8,487,764 5,923,881 2,195 Zoning The 2012 report on housing capacity and needs, taken together with the recently calculated increase in residential capacity in the new TMU zone, demonstrate that there is more than adequate capacity to meet Tigard's housing needs over the next 20 years. Chapter 12: Transportation Goal 12.1 Develop mutually supportive land use and transportation plans to enhance the livability of the community. FINDING: The Lean Code, which will become effective upon approval of the proposed rezone, is designed to enhance community livability by: • Requiring development to build or pay for street improvements. • Designing streets with multimodal travel options. • Establishing street cross sections that enhance livability by focusing on elements that provide a safe, comfortable, and attractive pedestrian experience. • Supporting mixed-use development that reduces the need for vehicle trips. • Minimizing creek crossings. • Encouraging alleys for vehicle access. • Recognizing that 72"d Ave and Dartmouth streets provide important through street functions. Goal 12.2 Develop and maintain a transportation system for the efficient movement of people and goods. FINDING: The Lean Code, which will become effective upon approval of the proposed rezone, provides for the efficient movement of people and goods by: • Improving internal network connectivity through new streets,paths, and trails. • Proposing a new overpass to connect the Triangle to Downtown Tigard. • Restricting the number of access points to individual developments. • Requiring on-street parking, encouraging shared parking, and letting the market decide how much off-street parking is appropriate. Findings and Conclusions(CPA2017-00002,ZON2017-00002,DCA2017-00004) PAGE 6 OF 13 Exhibit D The proposed TSP amendments also provide for the efficient movement of people and goods by including new or more specific transportation projects in and around the Tigard Triangle that are designed to address mobility and queuing issues identified by the Transportation Planning Rule analysis. The proposed TSP amendments also include the Wall Street extension project on the TSP project list and maps. Wall Street is located in the Hunker Industrial Core Area. This area includes about 136 acres of industrially..zoned proper0 located%of a mile from 1-5 and immediately accessible by existing rail. Ninety-six acres are developed but underutilieed. Forty- two acres are undeveloped but limited in their development potential due to lack of access and infrastructure. Extension of Wall Street is expected to spur economic development by "unlocking"the development and employment potential of the remaining underdeveloped and undeveloped industrial lands in this area. It was identified as a needed project in the 2014 Hun:ziker Industrial Core Public Infrastructure Finance Strategy. Goal 12.3 Provide an accessible,multi-modal transportation system that meets the mobility needs of the community. FINDING:The Lean Code, which will become effective upon approval of the proposed rezone, provides for the mobility needs of the community by: • Requiring the development of complete streets and a variety of off-street facilities that provide multimodal travel options. • Requiring pedestrian and bicycle connections where street connections are not possible and where it would reduce travel length to transit and other destinations. A proposed increase to the Lean Code's block perimeter standard is also included with this proposal because the existing standard was found to have an unanticipated outcome. The existing block perimeter standard of 2,000 feet or less in length would potentially trigger a requirement for a dozen or more additional streets throughout the Triangle. This is not what was discussed with the community. Nor is it consistent with the Tigard Triangle Transportation Network Map. Additional analysis was performed, and it was determined that a block perimeter standard of 2,500 feet or less in length was more consistent with the original intent of the Lean Code. It was also determined that including the future streets,paths, and trails that are currently shown on the Tigard Triangle Transportation Network Map as part of the block perimeter measurement was necessary to achieve the future transportation network as envisioned by the community. Including future paths in the block perimeter measurement was found to be particularly important since it had already been determined through the planning process that streets are not desirable or practicable in these locations. The map on the following page illustrates the proposed modifications. The cityfinds that the overall integrity of the Lean Code is maintained with a larger block perimeter standard and measurement approach. The city also finds that the proposed modifications better reflect the future street network envisioned by the community, as shown on the Tigard Triangle Transportation Network Map, and provide for a transportation system Findings and Conclusions(CPA2017-00002,ZON2017-00002,DCA2017-00004) PAGE,7 OF 13 Exhibit D n T� -rte t; 10, Tigard Triangle s �..�' 1 r '� _ Transportation Network Map I , jf r� «j ) 1 ,<;1 � , 7. =isI Z i Future street intersection locations i t and future street,path,and trail r. _. �� 1- alignments are illustrative.All future i r ( •rs i , _�_, r transportation facilities are subject ! rr �� ' -9• to change based on development ,_ u 1-1 co review,final design,engineering rim1--' Block perimeter including \t-J- and permitting by the applicable " r , 1 �yl'1 future street is fs = approval authority. ! �, '`- a T--_Q,.o�, 1 approximately 1,900 feet _`� AA t � ` � '� • i - All%ce � 10111 ir , ,,,t t , j i„, , , isi oil, ,--, ,______ __ iI.-, _____._ • , `I \ Block perimeter including ! -___1 j i Ill "" **;*• ••• future street and path is i approximately 2,300 feet "i .: ��1 / L� , , Block perimeter including 9 1 , H ir ,, ® ••, 7L!__ i future path is 1 ; lit,44L&W lig 1 - --7- - .' approximately 2,500 feet lliiiz ' L A)'�/ "lbw. 7 N • c 1J . ,....040 iii11 R ••.• Imp" 0 ' J Transportation Facilities �� / � I "••••••• 111 Existing Street ' l • i ••■ Future Street 111111nj]11 111111111111.1 CT Future Path ■ .111111111111 Existing Trail imen rat 3 ._, 1 ,',, = Future Trail 1111111 Mi 1 r a. i J J /(� + + Bike Lane (Both Sides) �� *11 �■� sLi- t. ------ Bike Lane (East Side) 1 rr Alleys(Encouraged) I I ems d ill n Tigard Triangle Plan District _ , -Ij I L., J Findings and Conclusions(CPA2017-00002,ZON2017-00002,DCA2017-00004) PAGE 8 OF 13 Exhibit D that meets the mobility needs of the community. Goal 12.5 Coordinate planning,development,operation,and maintenance of the transportation system with appropriate agencies. FINDING: The proposed amendments were coordinated with all appropriate agencies that have transportation interests or authority in the area, including Metro, ODOT, and Washington County. CONCLUSION: The applicable provisions of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan are met. C. METRO CODE 3.07 (Urban Growth Management Functional Plan) Title 6 The Regional Framework Plan provides for an automatic trip reduction of 30 3.07.630 percent below the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) when analyzing the traffic impacts associated with a rezone,pursuant to the Oregon Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) per OAR 660-012-0060,when the following actions have been taken: 1. A town center boundary has been established; 2. Comprehensive plan and land use regulations have been revised to allow an appropriate mix and intensity of uses for town centers;and 3. Plans,programs,and standards have been adopted to achieve non-SOV (single occupant vehicle) mode share targets including: A. Multi-modal street design standards consistent with Title 1 of the Regional Transportation Functional Plan (RTFP); B. Transportation system management projects and strategies consistent with Title 1 of the R['FP;and C. Parking management programs and regulations consistent with Title 4 of the R11-43. FINDING: The city completed a transportation analysis consistent with the requirements of OAR 660-012-0060 to address TPR compliance for the proposed rezone of portions of the Triangle from General Commercial(C-G)and Mixed-Used Employment(MUE)to Triangle Mixed-Use(IMU). The city's preliminar3'analysis utilized the current ITE methods and reductions for trip generation in mixed-use areas, not the automatic 30 percent trip reduction allowed by Metro code. Both methods produced roughly the same number of trips, and both the city and ODOT agreed that the required 1 PR mitigations would he the same regardless of the method used. However, ODOT preferred that the city utilise the automatic 30 percent reduction method since the current ll F method for mixed-use areas has notyet been incorporated into the ODOT Analysis Procedures Manual. The city agreed to this change in method with the understanding that ODOT and Metro would support the city's findings with respect to the three actions required by this section of Title 6, which are as follows: Findings and Conclusions(CPA2017-00002,ZON2017-00002,DCA2017-00004) PAGE 9 OF 13 Exhibit D 1. Metro currently acknowledges the Tigard Triangle as a town center on the Metro 2040 Map despite a procedural error that occurred when the cityfirst attempted to adopt the boundary in 2011. The ci y recognizes that it needs to take local action to formally adopt the boundary pursuant to Metro 3.07.620(b)and commits to taking this action within six months of adoption of the proposed rezone. The city will include a statement to this effect in the adopting ordinance for this proposal. 2. The city adopted the Tigard Triangle Lean Code in August 2017. Its effective date is contingent upon the adoption of the proposed rezone. The Lean Code is a comprehensive set of standards and procedures designed to facilitate the transformation of the Triangle into an active, urban, multimodal, and mixed-use district. The Lean Code created a new mixed-use zone, which is proposed to be applied with this rezone, that removes the maximum floor area ratio (FAR)requirement of 0.40 for all non-residential development. The Lean Code also allows a greater mix of land uses as compared to the existing mixed-use zone and limits new auto-oriented development.All of these provisions are consistent with the mix and intensity of uses envisioned in town centers. 3. The city has a number of plans,programs, and standards in place to achieve non-SOV (single occupant vehicle)mode share targets in the Triangle as follows: A. The cry adopted multimodal street design standards consistent with Title 1 of the RI PP when it adopted the Lean Code in August 2017. See Section D of this report below for more detailed information. B. The ciy'c adopted Transportation System Plan includes a travel demand management section, including a table of strategies and a list of identified projects. One of these projects, TSM3, is located along 72nd Avenue in the Triangle. C. The cry adopted key parking regulations consistent with Title 4 of the R11-'P when it adopted the Lean Code in August 2017. See Section D of this report below for more detailed information. The ci y commits to adopting a comprehensive parking management plan for the Triangle within two years of adoption of the rezone. The ci y will include a statement to this effect in the adopting ordinance for this proposal. Title 6 The Regional Framework Plan identifies Centers,Corridors,Main Streets,and 3.07.640 Station Communities throughout the region and recognizes them as the principal centers of urban life in the region. Section 3.07.640 specifically recommends a critical number of residents and worker and a mix of housing types to make these areas vibrant and successful. FINDING: The Lean Code, which will become effective upon approval of the proposed rezone, removes the maximum floor area ratio (FAR)requirement of 0.40 for all non-residential development, including mixed-use development, in the new Triangle Mixed-Use (EMU) zone. Removal of this requirement will allow development that supports a greater densiy of residents and workers. The Lean Code also allows a greater mix of land uses, including all residential uses, and limits new auto-oriented development. Findings and Conclusions(CPA2017-00002,ZON2017-00002,DCA2017-00004) PAGE 10 OF 13 Exhibit D Title 8 A city or county proposing an amendment to a comprehensive plan or land use regulation shall submit the proposed amendment to the COO at least 35 days prior to the first evidentiary hearing on the amendment and shall comply with the functional plan. FINDING: The proposed amendments were submitted to a designee of the COO (Metro's Chief Operating Officer)on October 2,2017. The first evidentiary hearing is November 6, 2017. The 35-day submittal requirement has been met. The only applicable provisions of the functional plan that apply to the proposed code amendments are addressed above under Title 6. CONCLUSION: The applicable provisions of Metro Code 3.07(Urban Growth Management Functional Plan)are met. D. METRO CODE 3.08 (Regional Transportation Functional Plan) Title 1 Transportation system design shall ensure that new street construction and re- construction projects are designed to improve safety, support adjacent land uses and balance the needs of all users. Sections 3.08.110, 130,and 140 address street design,connectivity, and access and require pedestrian and bicycle facilities. FINDING: The Lean Code, which will become effective upon approval of the proposed rezone, includes a Transportation Network Map(Map 18.660.B)and Transportation Facility Standards(Section 18.660.090)that meet or exceed the Regional Transportation Functional Plan requirements. The Lean Code includes the following • New streets,paths, and trails to improve connectivityfor all travel modes • Opportunities for green streets • On-street parking to buffer pedestrians, slow vehicles, and support development • Narrow right-of-way widths to reduce the length of pedestrian crossings • Sidewalks on all streets and pedestrian through tions of at least 5 feet • Minimum bicycle parking requirements • Street trees and landscape buffers of at least 5 feet The proposed TSP amendments also include an update to Figure 5-12 so that it is consistent with the Lean Code transportation network map. Title 4 Cities and counties shall establish parking ratios and ensure adequate bicycle parking. FINDING: The Lean Code, which will become effective upon approval of the proposed rezone, has no minimum vehicle parking requirement and does not exceed the maximum vehicle parking ratios in Title 4. Both proposed parking ratios comply with Metro standards. The Lean Code also requires new development to install a minimum number of bicycle parking spaces, and it encourages shared and structured parking. Findings and Conclusions(CPA2017-00002,ZON2017-00002,DCA2017-00004) PAGE 11 OF 13 Exhibit D The city currently maintains a GIS-based inventory of off-street parking spaces in the Triangle that tracks ownership, number of parking spaces, and ratios of parking spaces to building square footages. The layer was designed to track parking space usage over time as well. The Triangle currently has 10,990 parking spaces totaling 128 acres Additionally, the city has prepared a draftparking management plan for the Triangle that includes policies and programs to support the redevelopment of surface parking lots and the more efficient use of existing private of street parking areas. This plan emphasizes the need for the city to take a more active role in parking administration and enforcement as redevelopment occurs, including but not limited to the provision of public parking lots and metered on-street parking. The city expects to finalize a draft plan in 2018,followed by public engagement and then adoption no later than the end of 2019. CONCLUSION: The applicable provisions of Metro Code 3.08 (Regional Transportation Functional Plan)are met. E. OREGON TRANSPORTATION PLANNING RULE (Oregon Administrative Rules 660-012-0060) The city is required to complete a TPR analysis when proposing a zone change that may significantly affect an existing or planned transportation facility. FINDING:The city completed a transportation analysis consistent with the requirements of OAR 660-012- 0060 to address TPR compliance for the proposed rezone of portions of the Triangle from General Commercial (C-G)and Mixed-Used Employment(MUE)to Triangle Mixed-Use(TMU). If effects are significant, I PR compliance requires measures be adopted to maintain system performance at levels consistent with those expected under current zoning and that capacity improvements identifr likely funding sources. The analysis studied 11 intersections, with a focus on mobility and queuing at interchanges serving ODOT facilities along the edges of the Triangle. Five intersections exceeded the mobility target and four exceeded the allowed safe stopping queuing distance length.All non-compliant intersections were evaluated for mitigation consistent with TPR requirements and discussed with ODOT. The city and ODOTfind that the following mitigation projects and next steps adequately address TPR compliance for the proposed rezone, all of which are reflected in the proposed TSP amendments: • 1-5 NB Ramps/SW 65th Ave at SW Haines St:Add a new City TSP Project that includes a signal and the addition of a northbound right turn on 65th Avenue at Haines Street. This project is an identified mitigation for the TriMet Southwest Corridor project and is assumed to be completed by this project. It is outside the City of Tigard and requires coordination and supportfrom the City of Portland and ODOT for RI P adoption. • OR-217 Northbound(NB)Ramps at SW 72nd Ave:Mod fy City TSP Project 4 to show the addition of a second NB right turn lane as part of the overall interchange improvement description. Findings and Conclusions(CPA2017-00002,ZON2017-00002,DCA2017-00004) PAGE 12 OF 13 Exhibit D • 1-5 SB Ramps at SW 68th Ave:Mods City TSP Pr ject 38 to accommodate the addition of a second westbound(WB)through lane and dedicated IVB left turn lane along Dartmouth Street. The addition of protected/permitted left-turn phasing on all approaches at the Dartmouth Street and 68th Avenue intersection takes advantage of the additional lanes on Dartmouth Street to add capacity to the intersection and improve the efficiency of the signal operations. • 1-5 SB Exit Ramp at Barbur/OR-99W:•Modifil City TSP Project 66d to show the removal of the northbound left turn lane and signal at 64th Ave as part of the overall 99W access management improvements. Left turn traffic demand will likely shift to the previous left turn signal at 69th Avenue or continue north on 99W This project increases capacity on SB 99W and eliminates queue failure on the northbound 1-5 Exit ramp to Intersection 6. It is outside the City of Tigard and requires coordination and support from City of Portland and ODOT for Regional Transportation Plan (R I P)adoption. CONCLUSION. The applicable provisions of OAR 660-012-0060 (Oregon Transportation Planning Rule) are met. E. STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS (Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197) FINDING: The Tigard Comprehensive Plan addressed the Statewide Planning Goals and was acknowledged by the state as being in compliance with state law;therefore, the Statewide Planning Goals are addressed under the Tigard Comprehensive Plan section. Findings and Conclusions(CPA2017-00002,ZON2017-00002,DCA2017-00004) PAGE 13 OF 13 SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET FOR/A (LATE OF MEETING) P 'RKINSC01 1120 NW Couch Street 0 +I503.727.2000 `�- 10th Floor 0 +1,503.727.2222 Portland,OR 97209-4128 PerkinsCote.com December 12, 2017 Dana L.Krawczuk DKrawczuk@perlonscoie.com D. +1.503.727.2036 F. +1.503.346.2036 VIA EMAIL Mayor Cook and City Council City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Base Camp I,LLC's Lean Code Testimony Dear Mayor Cook and City Councilors: Base Camp I, LLC ("Base Camp") strongly supports the City's efforts to streamline the code applicable to development in the Triangle. We also support the additional modifications included in the staff report to Council, which provide further clarification and certainty. Clarifying the code is critically important if the City desires to stimulate development, as demonstrated by Base Camp's efforts to develop in the Triangle. As you may recall, in 2016 the City approved Base Camp's cancer treatment center(the "Project"), located at the corner of SW Dartmouth Street and SW 72nd Avenue (tax lot 300). For the past year the Project has been on appeal,and the issue on appeal relates to ambiguity in the current code about the interaction of street standards in the Tigard Triangle provisions and general code standards. Base Camp owns the two tax lots highlighted on the attached Exhibit 1, and would like to develop that property in the future(the "Future Development Site"). Our review of the Lean Code was through the lens of how the code would apply to the Future Development Site,with an emphasis on road spacing and connectivity standards,which has been an issue in the appeal of the oncology center Project. Based upon Map 18.620.B Tigard Triangle Transportation Network(attached as Exhibit 2) and the transportation network connectivity standards in CDC 18.620.090.C.3 that consider future streets and pedestrian paths when analyzing block perimeters and whether additional streets are required,two important conclusions related to street connectivity as applied to the Future Development Site can be drawn : 1. A future path is the required transportation improvement in the vicinity of the oncology center Project and Future Development Site. This designation is appropriate because the approval for the Project requires a bicycle and pedestrian connection in that location, which also satisfies the Lean code map and text. 137764546.1 F§twas Cote LLP Mayor Cook and City Council City of Tigard December 12, 2017 Page 2 2. No street extension/vehicular connectivity west of SW 72nd Avenue in the vicinity of the Project and Future Development Site is required. As depicted on the attached Exhibit 3, the block perimeter length that includes the Future Development Site is less than 2,400 feet. We support the Lean code and clarifying amendments, and look forward to the oncology center Project and Future Development Site being among the first projects to contribute urban renewal funds in the Tigard Triangle. Very truly yours, Dana L. Krawczuk DLK:dlk 137764546.1 L.1' Mayor Cook and City Council City of Tigard December 12, 2017 Page 3 Exhibit 1 —Base Camp Property 1 N (1 Y rd _., . 5etect taxtot«, i:>\:, !Iir ' map 11 II ..____ - 4kTjPili 1 1111111 �.a r__ i I `� L i. .- ' -,_.„LLE. - -,_ 1` 1 mil ,, ,,, - - r ,, r , i------,, \ t__+__L_ . ,, , , I, li/ min N ii, , , i\ \ 1----- 1 L I I-T- T i 1, 111011 0 �i t'\ \;I • =Future Development Site = Oncology Center Site 137764546.1 Pews Cam LLP Mayor Cook and City Council City of Tigard December 12, 2017 Page 4 Exhibit 2—Map 18.620.B Tigard Triangle Transportation Network Tigard Triangle _ y -- �`IS 1 ".117- l � 1 _. Transportation Network Map I i --Ili / .1116"d111116. ( SA . n IC 134'H8", •__—�� i _ Or :: il Future street intersection locations _ _ _ and future street,path,and trail -J _ I �+ iiii ,' its, s d— - alignments are illustrative.All future -" -aap ,+� transportation facilities are subject , — `' I iii —>°- to change based on development _ — rr� 4 ' m- review,final design,engineering - — 111 �� and permitting by the applicable ^ — L.,41.4 $ 11\ /a 1- approval authority. 1 �O� • ■ ism IN \F C� :4,6.4.0*v*a \, �` 'N'a 1111-111 :`' 'N6. ItlikAk V4 c .i �tlli O-4\ .4111111‘ ID .i�..1111111111 Ids •J! __I n ■N g‘trii. 1 luirt•FAN- wool Li =_�j rr . 4 •1 1111 i11 ■, lu I• �' SART 1 plinitill or .��-- _ MOUTHsT x1.1 '1, la AMIE rag III II NMI 10. ilia._ L ' V' • 11 \ 1,111411/a i fikerim....7 71111Wri inisound , 1 i__ i ) *IF / II Z �� *am n • N � 4/ ••• n • NDN UNE -J _ _ — • • 2j�4iiiii R fib 11 �� i is — ` es ■• NI is• ■ Transportation Facilities LiI AbIll, k11111111111\I.I■ ',, Iii,s, Ad Future Path ;.•M�� Existing Trail ■� ` Future Trail R„ NOM <1 - . Bike Lane(Both Sides) Amp _ ------ Bike Lane(East Side) n= s � �,� gI � Alleys(Encouraged) 1 I �� Tigard Triangle Plan District Mayor Cook and City Council _ City of Tigard December 62,2017 ]Pale 5Exhibit 3-1B1oclk Perimeter Length // / , ° ' *:i.:- "4,440HTL, . —''. , , , z, r a I '. .-,c ; ,1 X11\ .j� �,' � 0,40 1 ' W _ a �: AX LOT 303 { Z _ _ - 1 018A I W POSSIBLE FUTURE 741F ..,,, __ _ STREET ALIGNMENT�/ :1,1_1' '- -2 7''''P 6-.101--:-' .i L Z / k.... •-• -. ./. ' r-- , - / 1 I _ FAX{DT 401 TAX YAP 1;,1BA ,, / 1.;.'"1,1,4-.,, ; \ C = APPROXIMATE BLOCK 14X, :� r LENGTH±2,370 I/ 4 0 I --- t I 1 j 1 _. i SCALE: 1".•100 =EET 100 0 w 60 80 100 . 1 1' y DATE 11/30/2017 i 4 1 APPROXIMATE BLOCK LENGTH EXHIBIT TRIANGLE MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING A MS ENGNEERING&FORESTRY,LLC WM: CM 12965 SW HERMAN RD,SiE 100AKS SC omo. 1UA.A11N, OR 97062 AKS,oe: P:503.563.6151 F:503.563.6152 da-eng.co 4762 o147I2 MX IEM:IM I VVI 9R ION 121 SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET FOR taa- -.1.1-11-2;-1-k61-2-- (DATE OF MEETING) 114 I " City of Tigard T I G ARD Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and City Councilors From: Susan P. Shanks, Senior Planner Re: Staff Recommendation to Modify Proposal for Clarity and to Address Omissions Tigard Triangle Lean Code Phase II (CPA2017-00002, ZON2017-00002, DCA2017-00004) Date: December 12, 2017 CHAPTER 18.710 LAND USE REVIEW PROCEDURES 18.710.020 Summary of Land Use Applications Table 18.710.1 Summary of Land Use Applications Abbreviation Land Use Application Type Applicable Section Review Type ARUADU Accessory Dwelling Unit 18.410 I MIS Adequate Public Facilities Exception 18.640 II (within River Terrace) ZCA Annexation - Quasi-Judicial 18.720 III-Modified - Legislative Legislative CPA Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment - Quasi-Judicial(site specific) 18.795 III-Modified - Legislative (city-wide) Legislative CPA _Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment 18.795 Legislative CUP Conditional Use - Initial 18.740 III-HO - Major Modification III-HO - Minor Modification I DCA Development Code Amendment 18.795 Legislative UFR Discretionary Urban Forestry Plan Review 18.520 III-PC,III-HO MIS DIR Director's Determination 18.730 I DIR Code Interpretation 18.730 I DDR Downtown Design Review 18.650 I,II,III-DR MIS Historic Overlay Designation - Designation or Removal of 18.750 III-PC Designation II - Alteration, construction or demolition HOP Home Occupation - Type I 18.760 I - Type II II LLA Lot Line Adjustment 18.810 I LLA Lot Line Consolidation 18.810 I MAR Marijuana Facilities Permit 18.430 I MIS Miscellaneous River Terrace exception 44,644 II Nonconforming Use Confirmations I MLP Minor Land Partition 18.820 II MIS Noncon ormin- Use Determination 18.50 I PDR Planned Development - Concept Plan 18.770 III-PC - Detailed Development Plan III-PC SLR Sensitive Lands Review 18.510 I, II, III-HO SDR Site Development - New Construction 18.780 II - Major Modification II MMD - Minor Modification I SGN Sign Permit 18.435 I SUB Subdivision - Without Planned Development 18.830 II - With Planned Development 18.830/ 18.770 III-PC MIS Transportation Mitigation 18.660 II (within Tigard Triangle) TUP Temporary Use Permit 18.440 I UFR Urban Forestry Plan Modification 18.520 I VAR/ADJ Variance/Adjustment - Outside Tigard Triangle 18.790 I, II Within Tigard Triangle 18.660 II ZON Zoning Map Amendment - Quasi-Judicial(Site specific) III-PC - Legislative(City-wide) 18.795 Legislative - With Comprehensive Plan Map III-Modified amendment