Loading...
Cook Park Expansion Master Plan - Final Report - June 10, 1997 COOK PARK EXPANSION MASTER PLAN Final Report Prepared for: City of Tigard Planning Division June 10, 1997 Prepared by: Murase Associates, Inc. D.A. Hogan & Associates Kittleson& Associates, Inc. Kampe Associates Fishman Environmental Services TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction: Cook Park Expansion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Planning Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Cook Park Study Area Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . la Cook Park Task Force . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Design Team . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Planning Workshop . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Mission Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Issues and Opportunities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Public Open House . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Park Master Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Master Plan Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5a Park Features Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Picnic Shelters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Picnic Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Multi-Use Shelter/ Gazebo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Restrooms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Tot-Lot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Parking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Bio-Swales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Wetland Resource Protection and Enhancement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Wetland Creation/ Enhancement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Wetland, Nature and Cultural Interpretation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Trail Improvements and Regional Connections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Trail Creation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Active Sports Fields . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Master Plan Features Comparison Chart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9a Recommended Project Phasing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 APPENDIX: Preliminary Cost Estimate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12-13 L COOK PARK EXPANSION MASUR PLAN planning effort for this property, known In 1990, a master plan for Cook Park as the Gray Property. To the east, the was prepared for the City of Tigard by Thome wry Property was also identi- Murase Associates, landscape architects fied as a potential addition to the park. and planners. Seven years later, and after the implementation of many of the 7 Tanned amenities the City of P � Tigard asked Murase Associates to revisit Cook Park and update the plan to re- 3 flect the evolving landscape and the changing needs of the community. k r: Due to the explosive population in- crease within the City of Tigard in re- cent ecent years, there was an increasing def- icit of open space for passive and ac- tive recreation. : J' Local sports leagues and organizations approached the City of Tigard to re- solve their concems. The City and the 7 1 sports leagues quickly realized that the ' recreational needs of the community had changed since the completion of ❑ TM PLANNING PROCESS the previous master plan. The increased As part of the Citysplanning process interest in soccer, adult physical fitness and the growing number of youth the Cook Park Task Force was formed leagues created new recreation demands as an advisory group to eFicit communi- that needed to be addressed. The City ty support and input. of Tigard began investigating options for the expansion of existing facilities. Murase Associates was asked to guide The potential for the expansion of the planning process and complete a Cook Park previously identified was new master plan for the park that fo- reinvestigated. With the cooperation ofd on the expansion areas to the the surrounding land owners, the City north and east. The Task Force con- initiated negotiations for the purchase tamed representatives of three interest of an adjacent, 21- acre property. The groups: the City of Tigard local sports', leagues, and the adjacent neighbor- City's vision for expanding the park has `) since come viable, spurring the new hoods. Various environmental groups also gave input to the Task Force throughout the process. 1 i - ❑ COOK PARK TASK FORCE ❑ THE PLANNING WORKSHOP City of Tigmid The Cook Park Task Force defined and Jim Nicoli, Mayor formally recognized a ' ' ssion Paul Hunt, City Council President mi----- statement.-at-the i i i 1 plannui_�work Comnxmity and Sports 122g session, led under the auspices of John Cook, Cook Park namesake Murase Associates. Additional pro- Mark vossler gram features were also designated. Brian Wegener The event included an "a_wareness tour" Spottof the entire existing park area and the Dave Nicol i Leaguesof potential expansion area. The Crary Stephens tour was carefully orchestrated to bring the Task Force and the design and City Staff Support planning consultants into physical and James Hendryx, Community visual contact with important park plan- Development ning issues as they explored the area by Duane Roberts, Planning foot. At the completion of the three Ed Wegner, Public Works hour tour, members had gained a com- munal uriderstanding of the site and de- veloped a common language to help them communicate more effectively at the following work sessions. Together the Task Force not only inventoried the existing features of the park, but also discovered new places and charwAer- istics of the park that they had not pre- viously recognized. Ideas and opportu- nities not initially apparent,to the Task Force gave new life to the entire plan- ning effort. ❑ DESIGN TEAM After the "awareness tour" the Task lMMumse Associates,Inc., Landscape Architec- Force gathered at a picnic shelter and ture, Urban Design&Planning began discussing what they had discov- ered and experienced on the tour. Fishman Em ironmental Services, Murase Associates guided the dialogue Ecological Resource Management to define potential park program ele- ' D.A. Hogan&Associates, Civil Engineer and ments and new park activities. The Sports Field Expert work session included several planning exercises that helped the group identify Kanpe Associates, Inc., Civil Engineers and prioritize desired program features. IGttleson&Associates, Inc. Transportation These were recorded, summarized, and later refined at subsequent Task Force Plaiuiing/Traffic Engineers meetings. 2 ❑ MISSION STATEMENT The following Cook Park Task Force ■ Integration of Uses mission statement grew out of the con- Duplication of uses within Tigard sensual prioritization of park features: Large parks vs. small parks ■ Additional Sports Fields To inVrove the park to serve the great . Site capacity est nwnher of citizens with the least ■ Linkages impact to the inherent natwd chamder • Tigard - Durham - Tualatin and resowces of the existing pa;c and ■ Funding the adjacent expansion area Land acquisition and park features Non-profit Perhaps most important was the recog Private nition that Cook Park was a very im Public portant natural park and recreational re- source for the local community, and any improvements implemented must take this into consideration. It was felt that the park improvements needed to be well planned, high quality, and dura- t y� Kr ble in design and construction, while being cost effective. The Task Force continued to meet and ❑ OPPORIUNITIES discuss the issues involved in imple- menting the common desires of the ■ Improve Access and Parking group. Workshop notes were used Increase parking to mitigate im throughout the planning process. pact on neighborhood Better park identification and ❑ ISSUES signage Improved multi-modal access, ■ Parking/Access local and regional access Impacts to neighborhood ■ Protect and Enhance • Intersection at Durham Road Natural Areas/Wetlands ■ Impacts to Natural Areas/Wetlands Enhance existing buffers Buffers Protect the flood plain Flood Plain Natural systems Fragmentation ■ Enhancement of Neighborhood ■ Impacts to Neighborhood Improved and controlled access Noise Visually pleasing design solutions Views Plan for compatible uses Access ■ Additional recreation opportunities Security ■ Opportunities for a variety of funding Compatibility methods 3 ❑ PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE In addition there was concern that the As part of the planning process a pub- wetland areas receive maximum protec- lic_open house meeting was conducted. tion from intrusion, especially in areas This meeting provided an opportunity near sports fields. These concerns are for community residents to comment on also addressed in the master plan with the preliminary master plan before provision for wetland buffers, fencing, completion. signage and wetland fringe enhance- ment. Safety and security were primary con- ceras. It was hoped that pedestrian These issues and refinement of park safe multi-modal access along 92nd features will be studied in greater detail Avenue would be included in the park in the next phase of the park master plan. This would include the introduce- plan. tion of sidewalks separated from auto- mobile and bicycle traffic. fR Security gates for the park at the top of the hill near the en ' to Waverly Es- tates were also suggested to control 1: after hours park access. The park mas- ter plan proposes these gates and addi- tional gates throughout the park to con- trol access during different use seasons ;M@01-111 and events. "` ' Traffic speed reduction devices and road width were also important issues - presented. The master plan proposes entry monuments, directional and park rules signage to signal the visitor that they have arrived and extra safety awareness is required ;,,;•, The proposed addition of more park - trails and regional trail connections prompted a lot of comment concerning provisions for the monitoring of trails during closed hours. This issue will require closer attention and coordina- tion as the regional trail system that is not part of the Cook Park Expansion project continues to develop. 4 ❑ TIS PARK MASTER PLAN all the needs of the Task Force and The physical layout and planning of the integrate park program features. The park program features were guided by resulting masterlan successfully Y the Cook Park Task Force and pro- achieves the Task Forces mission.state- duced by Mucase Associates and the ment and the evolving program require- 1, Design-Team 1 The plan evolved over a ments ten month period of Task Force meet- ings. Wetland issues became para ■ Community Amenities mount in the planning effort. The Task Picnic Shelters Force directed the City to retain Picnic Areas Fishman Environmental Services to Restrooms report on the extent, character, and Tot-Lot quality of the surrounding wetlands. Parking Together with Fishman Environmental, Murase Associates produced a study of ■ Wetland, Natural and LJ` ' preliminary park plan alternatives that Cultural Resources clearly identified the implications of Resource Protection 4� encroaching on wetland areas: fihe • Creation and Enhancement Task Force used thus information in an Wetland, Nature and Cultural informal dialogue with the Oregon Di- Interpretation vision of State Lands, Department of Trail Improvements and Regional Fish and Wildlife and other regulatory Connections agencies.. Adjacent land owners and Trail Creation other potential funding partners, such as Metro and Unified Sewage Agency ■ Recreational Amenities (USA), were contacted to contribute Active Sports Fields their input regarding the potential ex- Restrooms pansionarea These discussions Concession Facility helped the Task Force understand the Parking 'importance of the wetlands, potential ecological impacts, and ways to im- prove mprove and enhance the wetland areas. `t. With this information, the Task Force ; re-directed and re-prioritized its park program criteria and requirements. The resolution of wetland issues provided opportunities to enhance the natural character of the park, as well as provid- ing the impetus to introduce nature and -cultural interpretation. Murase Associ- ates continued their efforts to balance 5 ❑ PARK FEATURES ■ Picnic Shelters Additional picnic shelters were identi- fied as a high priority park feature. The existing picnic shelters are often over-scheduled from early spring through the summer. City staff and the maintenance crew have found that the existing type of shelter being used is , durable and easily maintained, and rec- ommended that additional shelters of a similar type be used in the expansion ° area. Two additional picnic shelters are ■ Multi-Use Shelter/ Gazebo planned in the new master plan. One A multi-use gazebo is planned for an is located on the grassy knoll near the area near the Mary Woodward Maple river. This location will provide a cov- Grove. This facility is intended to sup- ered picnic area that has a great view ply the park with a small stage for inti- of the river and offers easy access to mate summer concerts in the shade of the floating dock. The second shelter the trees, or as shelter for children's is planned for the northeast corner of theater, craft activities or similar, com- the existing woodland adjacent to the munity focused events. Thomas Dairy expansion area Here the shelter can serve families and ■ Restrvorm groups exploring the wetland interpreta- Restrooms are a necessity for any pub- tion area, the meadow, or the cultural lic area, especially one as popular as interpretive sites planned for the Thom- Cook Park. Two new restrooms are as Dairy area. It will also be cone- planned. As previously mentioned, one nient to groups gathered to watch sport will be located near the new soccer events on the Gray Property expansion fields in the expansion area, making it area to the north. New restrooms near accessible to sports field users, specter the sports fields will also be convenient tors, trail users, and wetland and nature for picnic shelter users. enthusiasts.. The second location is near the current park road gate on 92nd ■ Picnic Arm Avenue. This building will also incor- Cook Park currently boasts an inven- porate a concession stand and storage tory of 75 picnic tables, all of which for local, non-profit sports leagues. receive heavy use in the summer Operated by the league's association, months. The new plan calls for an ad- the profits of the concession stand will ditional 35 tables to meet growing de- go toward the upkeep of the sports fa- mand cilities in the park. 6 ■ Tot Lot water allowing suspended sediments to A small Tot-Lot will be developed near settle out. The plantings also'use the the sports field spectator area and nutrients in the runoff to promote restrooms. This location will allow healthy plant growth Bio-swale areas parents to conveniently monitor their become rich with an ecology of their younger children while watching the own older kids participate in team sports nearby. ■ Wedand Resowce Protection and Enhancement ■ Padang The surrounding wetlands play an im With the increase in picnic facilities portant role in the local riparian and and sports fields, as well as the rising wildlife ecology. Although much of popularity of annual Cook Park events, the wetland area has been used in the additional parking will need to be pro- past for agriculture or grazing, its sig vided. Currently, the park has a capac- nificance as a winter waterfowl habitat ity for 184 cars. In the height of sum- has not been overlooked The Cook mer picnic and sports season, this ca- Park master plan pays special attention pacity is often exceeded, leading to un to retaining the wetland's valuable eco- safe and illegal parking on the shoulder logical contribution. Wetlands and wa of 92nd Avenue, in adjacent neighbor- terfowl habitat will be protected by a hoods, and in areas that could impede minimum 25 foot buffer which will be emergency vehicles. With a phased ad planted with native trees and shrubs. dition of the planned parking areas, the The woody buffer will provide separa park will have an increased future ca tion between park activities and wild pacity of 546 cars, ample enough to life use. It will also provide food and serve the increased amenities of the cover for wildlife. Where feasible, the park. buffer area will be increased to provide additional protection. Paths and ■ Bio-swales signage will border the buffer area in To help mitigate the adverse impact of some locations, discouraging access increased impervious surfaces in the into the wetland area and providing park, the majority of the seasonally- environmental interpretation opportuni- used parking areas will be gravel. ties. Perimeter fencing will also help Gravel construction allows partial infil- control access and allow the buffer tration of storm water. The storm wa plantings to mature and become more ter runoff from large storms will be effective buffer and wildlife habitat. directed from the parking areas and natural wetlands toward the bio-swales. ■ Wedand Creation/ Entrancement Bio-swales filter the sediment, nutrients In some areas, new wetlands will be and pollutants from the storm water, created to mitigate impacts to the naturally cleansing it before it seeps wetlands that already exist in the area. back into the soil. Each bio-swale is Wetland experts attest to the value of planted with a diversity of native plant wetlands in flood plain areas which species which slow the velocity of the are often more productive and more 7 important wildlife resources than those nections to surrounding communities. in upland locations. The created This supports the City's mandate to en- wetlands will be constructed following courage alternate modes of transpocta State and Federal regulations for tion and reduce parking needs while of- wetland mitigation and will be closely fering a much needed recreational re- monitored emonitored for a minimum of five years source. Durham, Tualatin, Tigard and after construction to ensure their suc- Beaverton will be networked to provide cess. common access to shared regional rec- reational facilities. ■ Wetland, Nature and C W wal Interpretation To address the increasing interest and awareness of the cultural history of the area, and to educate the community on the benefits of the wetland area, Nature and Cultural interpretation plaques will be located throughout the expansion area This will aid everyone's under- } standing, awareness and reverence for _ these important ecological resources. ■ Vail Improvements and s Regional Connections r" Existing park trails will be improved to make them more accessible and to dis- courage deviation into sensitive natural woodland areas. Soft wood chip paths will meander throughout the expansion area and lead to regional connection paths. Regional paths will have an as- phalt surface convenient for wheel- chairs, bicycles, baby strollers and the infirm, enabling the whole community to use the park. ■ Vail Creation New trails will be created within the limits of Cook Park. The trails will link new areas with the existing trail _ system and help control circulation in sensitive areas. The existing regional trail system will be expanded to complete projected con- 8 ■ Active Spoils Melds The addition of the adjacent Gray Prop- erty will provide the growing local community with more active sports fields. These new fields will be de- signed and constructed for maximum high quality performance and durabili- ty. Recycled wastewater will be used , p' to irrigate the new grass play surface. A special buried drainage system will direct sediment and nutrient loaded rain and irrigation water away from the en- hanced nhanced wetland area into special bio- swales that cleanse the water prior to infiltration back into the soil. The drainage system minimizes the ponding of rain water on play surfaces that is usually encountered after a period of rain, thus affording more efficient use of the park resource. 9 City of Tigard COOK PARK - PROPOSED MASTER PLAN Park Features Existing Proposed Total Features Additions Total Area 52 acres 27acres 79 acres Entry Monuments and Signage 0 2 2 Picnic Shelters 2 2 4 Picnic Tables 75 35 110 Wetland View Point Gazebo 0 1 1 Children's Tot-Lot 0 1 1 Children's Playground 1 0 1 Restrooms 2 2 4 Concessions Facility 0 1 1 Multi-Use Shelter 0 1 1 Drinking Fountains 4 3 7 Parking 184 287 471 with future expansion 67 538 Sports Fields Baseball / Softball 2 3* 5 Soccer 3 3* 6 Basketball 1 0 1 Volleyball 1 0 1 Trails Within park boundaries .8 miles* .7 miles* 1.5 miles Interpretation Stations Nature 0 3 3 Wetland 0 3 3 Cultural 0 3 3 Floating Dock 1 0 1 Maintenance / Storage Building 1 1 2 *estimate 92 April 10,1997 ❑ PXCOMUNDED PROJECT PHASING The strategic phased implementation of park features prioritized within each imple- park improvements will help the city mentation phase. Some features are pre- save money by giving logic to its irrl- requisites to providing other improvements. plementation process. To illustrate, the chart below provides an example of PARK FEATURE PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 Picnic Tables 2 2 Picnic Areas 2 1 1 Multi-Use Shelter 2 Restroars 1 Tot-Lot 2 Parking i Bio-Swales 1 Wetland Resource Protection&Enhancement 1 Wetland Creation 1 Wetland,Nature&Cultural Interpretation 2 Trail Improvements&Regional Connections 2 Trail Creation 3 Active Spats Fields 1 1=high priority 2=nr&umptiotity 3=low priority 10 ❑ CONCLUSION Led by Murase Associates, the City of ment phase. At that time,costs and Tigard, the Cook Park Task Force and funding opportunities can be analyzed the design team integrated the evolved more closely and design refinements passive and active recreational and out- will be made accordingly. As the pro- door needs of the community in the jected needs arise and funding for con- new Cook Park Expansion Master Plan. struction becomes available, new park features will be constructed- The onstructedThe Master Plan is meant to function as a gTeral guide for the implements- Together, the community has come to- tion of additional park features in gether to plan their environment in an planned phases. The design ofiridi- ecological and human way for the vidual features of the plan will occur greatest benefit to all. �, G during the subsequent design develop- 11 APPENDIX Preliminary Cost Estimate 12 ❑ Preliminary Cost Estimate Summary Park Entry and Signage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $27,000.00 Interpretive Signage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $18,000.00 Parking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $577,000.00 Baseball Lot . . . . . . . . . $104,000.00 Lot 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $137,000.00 Lot 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $82,500.00 Lot 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $148,500.00 Lot 4 Future . . . . . . . . . $105,000.00 Trail and Path Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $86,400.00 Wetland Viewpoint and Wetland Access Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $226,300.00 Park Landscape . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $200,000.00 Structures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $270,000.00 Restroom No.I. . . . . . . . $50,000.00 Restroom No.2 . . . . . . . $251,000.00 Maintenance Bldg. . . . . . $60,000.00 Picnic Shelters . . . . . . . $90,000.00 Multi-Use Gazebo . . . . . $45,000.00 Utilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $64,000.00 Sports Field Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $525,000.00 Park Irrigation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $5,500.00 Sub Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,999,200.00 20% Contingency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $399,840.00 PRELAfi IARY TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,399,040.00 13 I A) O \ Q ENTRY MONUMENTS Q\ O ENTRY SIONAOE /��[�-��� f/ O Q •iY•�'. I C '�/ -1WlNATVRJYE�RMI LOYNU�EMSI I[TNAiTt�EIDS 0 OC'QQ 00 -r——T—I—I❑1—II_1—IIIL T❑1I� —T 7II►—1—iT� ` O10 "Irln1 � O WAVERLY ESTATES 1 -Ty V/0 p ❑ 11 1' G��. , o p QITtI ❑� I USA OP R OPERTY 7OYYY���� � 111 I I 1 I ^ ,. '(•--- �� MULTFMOOAL PATH J, 1 �� REOIONAL CONNECT" Q �..A ..• ••••••••••.•••.•.•• O \I FANNO AIEK TM CONNECTION c • r "1 l i 1 I• , II I O 00 ` I AREA �•T•I' �l' � ',L I � a I ` � ►A ADDITIONAL WETLAND ;M PEDESTRIAN I rr TION BUFFER PLANT04S .rAK L FA wCTlANO BUFFER PLANTINGS `.lr FOOT BRK70F I,.• A `i ADDITIONAL�TLANO 1 BUFFER PWEI�1NO$M ,t!^1 � `1 1•, `. iMULUMOOAL 6TH SPORTS 1 I r R. [ - 6PORTE FIELDS P SPORTS FIELDS )1ESTROOM •1 I IfRESTROOM r rrl \ IDTr TLOT►IAYAROUNq C E P -- I i1l^/'I•�_Lf. •T S ENTRY SIONAOE AND CCONCE 100 PARK DIRCORY 0 100 P LNG LoS !• 'I�OENCYJI f HKAO MPM 1r 1r TV NtMOUNO r j Lot. i ....+� FUTURE WANSr01 %: -I I 1• r [T PARKING �, •J.' I •, STORM WATER QUALITY BK1•SWAIE PICNIC SHELTER—�[ I III •\ / \\ MULTI.USE GAZEBO g I MARY WOOOwARD i / `i i NATURE LATER MA05 PO GAZEBO / KE GROVE ,� WCTLINO,CVLTV PICNIC AREA r P BASEBALL/IELDi Sd PARK] \ Q D y//� I +1 �• WETLANOISIANO JXAT OI MEADOW WETLANO AREA TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS i [ O ;�[ REST BEATING [ WOODLAND WETLAND �.�•/"�✓"��• •• •• •L,. • "'II I MAINTENANCE BLDG. • NATURE INTERPRETATION I I \ CULTURAL INTERPRETATION \ CIA MlRPR[TA FUTUR[MVLTI•MOOAL REGIONAL TRAIL I I I TIMAI FANNO CR((K TRAIL CONNECTION JLP � II PICNIC SHELTER �Cy USA PROPERTY (i1 1 I I r II I Pt .. RARxoAo TRESTLE wER.w MHW.TIM CITY UWT! v P CITY Limits '-_•-- Ny..,1 W,YMI M.IA..Nri..a \ IJ[r•M w.wl.M�.. •��.. M H+T I w..•t+.r [Nr1Iw[ 6H NYII TAi.N rnrW ww..H A M 1Y..INA 1SOEN0•PROPOSED WANSK). I.W IN►IHI...iM...•..I.NM.N. BTW w+T N llw•[..KwwY IwIrT.,A W),IHI. �... � �..•�PN E.wrt.rT T...r 0r11rN.i - � •.•••R•.•tv-"A,..Ew9✓T `� ••,` •Nr.V $I-W-4—tKNr. P rN. INN �~�•�nw� (V./Y��'rYi1/�� ��� � � •\ HHIrLL.WT.I..t �KrN[I BLMWRy ��+Wy��j G.M/THN � (Y���� wN.+i[.+.w•..�.+ L%ItnNOrAIWNO�s..�M KI B7[ - wM.N BWr Lo, -_ •I •4.4.Ar.M.,,�.M..M.r �.w TT.tiq..Y/W Nr wrl.Y 1 �Mluw , r M.V....NITM�/Ir.•INN PREPARED FOR THE CITY OFTIGARD COOK PARK EXPANSION MASTER PLAN PROJECT CONSULTANTS: MURASE ASSOCIATES INC. HOGANASSOCIA PROPOSED FEATURES fI3HMAN ENVIRONMENTAL:SERVICES.INC. KITTELSON 6 ASSOCIATES.INC. n KAMPE ASSOCIATES,INC. 1• II O.H O►10•[l LAXOSCAPt ARCHRtI, VRSAN DESIGN PLANNING Tr Izo a oEs[i-4$1"" MUR(►SE IS0.1111}•1177 Assoc acct