The URL can be used to link to this page

SDR2003-00005 SDR2003 -00005 QUICKLUBE NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2003-00005 !J. CITY OF TIGARD QUICKLUBE Community Development ShapingA BetterCommunity 120 DAYS = 9/2/2003 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: QUICKLUBE CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2003-00005 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review to demolish an existing antique shop and construct a 3-bay oil change facility with associated parking and utilities. The property is approximately 21,780 square feet in size. APPLICANT: VMLK Consulting Engineers OWNER: DDHK, LLC. Attn: Jennifer Kimura Attn: Jim Horst 3933 SW Kelly Avenue 12604 SW 60th Court Portland, OR 97239 Portland, OR 97219 LOCATION: 13555 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S102CC, Tax Lots 600, 701 and 702. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a citywide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request for Site Development Review subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI. NOTICE OF TYPE H DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 1 OF 24 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Planning Division (Mathew Scheidegger, 639-4171, ext. 2437) for review and approval: 1. Provide documentation in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts that establish joint use of the existing access point. 2. Provide cross over easements for the three (3) parcels that are associated with the proposal. 3. Provide documentation that an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) Approach Road Permit has been acquired. 4. Provide a plan showing street trees along SW Pacific Highway in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 (Size and Spacing of Street Trees). Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: 5. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover the sewer and water connections and any other work in the public right-of-way (ROW). Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us). 6. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 7. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work in the right-of-way of Highway 99W. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. 8. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall provide the City Engineering Department a copy of the ODOT approved access permit. 9. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the City Engineering Department must receive confirmation of ODOT approval of the stormwater detention system. 10. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 11. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, December 2000 edition." NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 2 OF 24 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT: Submit to the Planning Division (Mathew Scheidegger, 639-417T, ext. 2437) for review and approval: 12. Address one (1) of the four (4) methods of mixed solid waste and recyclable storage according to Section 18.755. 40 (Methods of Demonstrating Compliance). 13. Provide information regarding the design standards of the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables section of the Tigard Development Code (TDC). THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Planning Division (Mathew Scheidegger, 639-4171, ext. 2437) for review and approval: 14. Provide an additional two (2) parking stalls. 15. Provide and implement a plan showing the proposed three (3) parking stalls located on the boarder of the subject site to be fit with wheel stops that are at least four (4) inches high, located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. 16. Submit a lighting plan to be approved by Jim Wolf of the Tigard Police Department. Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: 17. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way (or public easement) and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. 18. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water qualityfacility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. 19. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer, for the proposed onsite storm water treatment facility. 20. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant's engineer shall provide a final sight distance certification. 21. Prior to final approval, sidewalk and curb must be constructed according to ODOT standards. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 3 OF 24 SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History Two minor modification decisions were found associated with the existing building (antique furniture)). The first was to add a four hundred eighty (480) square foot addition to the existing building (MMD1999-00018) and the second was to add an additional ten (10) parking stalls to the parking area. No other land-use cases were found. Vicinity Information The subject site is located on the north side of SW Pacific Highway between SW Park and Watkins Streets. Property to the north is zoned C-G (General Commercial) and is developed with commercial uses. Property to the west is zoned R-3.5 (Low Density Residential) and is currently developed with single-family homes. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to demolish an existing antique shop and construct a 3-bay oil change facility with associated parking and utilities. The property is approximately 21,780 square feet in size. SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET All neighbors within 500 feet of the proposal were given the opportunity to comment on the proposal. No neighborhood comments were receive(J. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA A. Zoning Districts 18.520 (Commercial Zoning Districts) B. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation) 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements) 18.780 Signs) 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 Visual Clearance) C. Specific DR Approval Criteria 18.360 D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 E. Impact Study 18.390 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. ZONIING DISTRICT Commercial Zoning District: Section 18.520.020 Lists the description of the Commercial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the C-G zoning district: General Commercial. Development Standards: Section 18.520.040.B States that Development standards in Commercial Zoning Districts are contained in Table 18.520.2 below: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 4 OF 24 TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES STANDARD C-G Proposed Minimum Lot Size None 21,780 sq.ft. Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. 115 ft. Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 0 ft[11] 36 ft. -Side facing street on corner&through lots[1] - - -Side yard 0/20 ft[8] 0-3 ft. --Rear yard 0/20 ft[8] 55 ft. -Distance between front of garage&property line abutting a public or private street. - - Minimum Building Height N/A N/A Maximum Height 45 ft 40 ft. Maximum Site Coverage[2] 85% 40% Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 46% Minimum FAR N/A N/A Minimum Residential Density[4][5][6] N/A N/A Maximum Residential Density N/A N/A 1]The provisions of Chapter 18.795(Vision Clearance)must be satisfied. [2]Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [4] Notwithstanding the requirements of Section 18.715.020,minimum and maximum density shall be determined for residential only projects using the number of residential units per acre shown in the above table. The provisions for density transfer described in Section 18.715.030.B apply,using the minimum and maximum density shown in the above table.Any mixed-use or commercial only development does not have a minimum density requirement. [5] For purposes of determining floor area ratio and residential densities,the net development area shall be uses to establish the lot area,determined per Section 18.715.020.A. [6] Adjustments to minimum density in the Washington Square Regional center area subject to the standards set forth in Section 18.630.020.E. [8]No setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. [11]There shall be no minimum front yard setback requirement;however,conditions in Chapters 18.745 and 18.795 must be met. As demonstrated in the table above, the applicant's plans comply with the dimensional standards of the C-G zone. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Development Standards criteria have been satisfied. B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360, 18.630, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Access plan: No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. The subject site will be using the existing driveway off of SW Pacific Highway in order to access the site. The access drive is also used for the adjacent property to the southwest. Specific criteria which pertain to access are addressed under Chapter 18.705 (Access, Egress and Circulation). Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 5 OF 24 Joint access: Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. As mentioned above, the subject site will take access from an existing driveway that is used by the adjoining property to the southwest. The proposed oil change facility and associated parking is located on three separate parcels. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide documentation in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contract agreements that establishes joint use of the existing access point. The applicant will also be required to provide cross over easements for the three (3) parcels that are associated with the proposal. Public street access: All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. The subject site is accessible from SW Pacific Highway, which is a public street that will be maintained as a public street. Therefore, this standard has been met. Curb cuts: Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N: Concrete curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps anddriveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080: Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required; except where no sidewalk is planned, an asphalt approach may be constructed with City Engineer approval and Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shall be built to City configuration standards. No driveway approach shall be less than five feet from the side property line projected except in cul-de-sacs, without approval and written permission of the city. The end slopes may encroach within the five foot restricted area. No portion of any driveway approach, including the end slopes, shall be located closer than thirty feet to an intersection street right-of-way line. Commercial or service drives shall not be more than thirty feet in width and if located on the same lot frontage shall be separated by a minimum length of curb of thirty feet. Each residential driveway shall be not more than twenty-six feet in width including end slopes, and if more than one driveway is to be constructed to serve the same lot, the frontage spacing between such driveways shall be not less than thirty feet measured along the curb line. Joint access driveways shall conform to the appropriate width standard for commercial or residential type usage. The access to the site is pre-existing. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the groundfloor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings inmulti-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; The applicant has shown a five (5) foot walkway that extends from the southeast side of the proposed building to the sidewalk along SW Pacific Highway. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 6 OF 24 Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or_parking lots such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walcways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot "horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; The proposed walkway does not cross a vehicle access point or a parking lot. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The applicant's plan shows the pedestrian walkway from the subject building to be concrete. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. Access Management (Section 18.705.030.H) Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. A Transportation Impact Analysis was submitted by Kittelson & Associates, Inc., dated February 12, 2003. The study analyzed the Tigard Marketplace access intersection with Highway 99W, as well as the proposed site access easement. The applicant has indicated that access will be at the existing access easement located 155 feet south of the Tigard Marketplace intersection with Highway 99W. The analysis indicates that sight distance is adequate at the proposed access point on Highway 99W. Prior to final inspection the applicant's engineer will need to provide a final sight distance certification. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be 150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may,be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be aced as far from the intersection as possible. The applicant is proposing to share the existing access to Highway 99W at milepost 10.05. An ODOT permit for new access will be required. Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. Highway 99W is classified as an arterial, but is also an ODOT facility with limited access restrictions. The applicant is proposing to share the existing access at milepost 10.05, which is approximately 190 feet from the access of the adjoining property to the north. The above standard requires driveways along an arterial to be spaced 600 feet apart. However, the subject sites access is pre-existing. Therefore, the driveway spacing standard does not apply. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 7 OF 24 Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1 provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with 0-99 parking spaces is one 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The required parking for the proposed oil change facility is eight (8) parking stalls. Based on the above standard, the applicant is required to provide one access drive that is thirty (30) feet in width. The existing access drive is forty-seven (47) feet in width. Therefore, this standrd has been satisfied. One-way vehicular access points: Where a proposed parking facility indicates only one-way traffic flow on the site, it shall be accommodated by a specific driveway serving the facility; the entrance drive shall be situated closest to oncoming traffic and the exit drive shall be situated farthest from oncoming traffic. The existing access drive is designed for two-way traffic. Therefore, this standard does not apply. The Director has the authority to restrict access when the need to do so is dictated by one or more of the following conditions: To provide for increased traffic movement on congested streets and to eliminate turning movement problems, the Director may restrict the location of driveways on streets and require the location of driveways be placed on adjacent streets, upon the finding that the proposed access would: • Cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or • Provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles; or • Cause hazardous conditions to exist which would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare. To eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide for parking area connections; To facilitate pedestrian and bicycle traffic, access and parking area plans shall provide efficient sidewalk and/or pathway connections, as feasible, between neighboring developments or land uses; The access to the subject property is pre-existing and is not considered hazardous or constitutes a clear and present danger to the public health. Standards for access as well as for fire and life safety are discussed elsewhere in this decision (Section VIII. Agency Comments). Therefore, no access restriction is required. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Access, Egress and Circulation standards have not been met. CONDITION: • Provide documentation in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts that establish joint use of the existing access point. • Provide cross over easements for the three (3) parcels that are associated with the proposal. • Provide documentation that an ODOT Approach Road Permit has been acquired. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 8 OF 24 Environmental Performance Standards (18.725): Noise: For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.40.130 through 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. Visible emissions: Within the commercial zoning districts and the industrial park (IP) zoning district, there shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack of other point- source emission from space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water (steam) which is visible from a property line. Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) rules for visible emissions (340-21-015 and 340-28-070) apply. Vibration: No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. Odors: • The emission of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply. Glare and heat: No direct or sky-reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted and; there shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and these regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or constructing equipment at the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title. Insects and rodents: All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. The proposed use is an oil change facility which is an outright permitted use within the C-G zoning district. There is no indication within the application that these standards will not be met. However, ongoing efforts to meet these standards shall be maintained and any violation of these standards will be addressed by the City of Tigard's Code Enforcement Officer. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Environmental Performance Standards have been met. Landscaping and Screening (18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The subject site has one hundred twenty three (123) feet of frontage on SW Pacific Highway. According to the standard, parcels which front onto a public street for a distance greater than one hundred (100) feet must provide street trees spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart. Spacing of street trees depends on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a plan showing street trees along SW Pacific Highway in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 (Size and Spacing of Street Trees). NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 9 OF 24 Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 states that no buffer is required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street. No buffer is required between a proposed office use and existing office use. According to the Development Code, the only buffering and screening required is between the associated parking lot and the residentialroperties to the northwest, which is discussed below under the Special Provisions section ofthisdecision. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking ot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying ,and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscapeislands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. As indicated on the site plan, the associated parking lot is located between the proposed quicklube site and the abutting R-3.5 residential zoning district to the northwest. The applicant has proposed to screen the parking area with a fifteen (15) foot landscaped area which will consist of a combination of Cornus Alba (Tatarian Dogwood) shrubs, Cupressocyparis Leylandii (Cupressaceae) evergreen trees, existing deciduous trees and Arctostaphylos Uva-Ursi assachusetts Kinnikinnick) ground cover. The proposed fifteen (15) foot landscaped area will be located at the property line which is separated from the residential homes by a six (6) foot high wood fence. The applicant has also proposed an additional eight (8) to ten (10) foot landscaped area surrounding the proposed parking area. Plantings include a combination of Buxus microphylla, Curnus Alba, Fraxinus Oxycarpa (Flame Ash) trees, and Massachusetts Kinnikinnick. Based on the analysis above, the applicant has met the criterion. Screening Of Service Facilities: Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, anypublic facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; Screening of Service Facilities is addressed under Chapter 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage). FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have not been met. CONDITION: Provide a plan showing street trees along SW Pacific Highway in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 (Size and Spacing of Street Trees). Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 10 OF 24 The applicant's site plan shows a ninety one (91) square foot mixed solid waste enclosure. However, the applicant has not addressed one (1) of the four (4) methods of compliance for mixed solid waste and recyclables. Therefore, the applicant is required to address one (1) of the four (4) methods of mixed solid waste and recyclable storage according to Section 18.755.040 (Methods of Demonstrating Compliance). Location Standards: To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. The applicant's site plan shows the proposed trash enclosure to be located within the northern interior side yard and will not effect pedestrian or vehicular movement. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Design Standards: The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gateopenings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. The proposed trash enclosure will have a thirteen (13) foot gated entrance. However, the applicant has not addressed the design standards of the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage age Section of the Tigard Development Code. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide evidence that the proposed trash enclosure meets the design standards of the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables section of the Tigard Development Code. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage Standards have not been met. CONDITIONS: • Address one (1) of the four (4) methods of mixed solid waste and recyclable storage according to Section 18.755.040 (Methods of Demonstrating Compliance). • Provide information regarding the design standards of the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables section of the Tigard Development Code. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 11 OF 24 the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up.to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. Based on theroposed motor vehicle servicing use, the total number of required parking stalls is based off of 2.0/1,000 square feet. The proposed building is shown to be 4,200 square feet. Therefore, the minimum required parking for the site is eight (8). The applicant's plans show a total of six (6) parking stalls located adjacent to the building. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide an additional two (2) parking stalls. Joint Parking: Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1) The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be .presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3),If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. Joint parking has not been proposed with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Visitor Parking in Multi-Family Residential Developments: Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spacesshall provide an additional 15% of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. This project does not involve a multi-family use. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Preferential Long-Term CarpoolNanpool Parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. The proposed use is vehicle servicing with drive-through bays. Therefore, the parking associated with the use is considered short-term and is not required to have car/vanpool parking. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The subject site is required to provide a minimum of eight (8) parking stalls. According to ADA standards, parking lots with 1 to 25arking stalls must provide 1 ADA accessible stall that is nine (9) feet wide with an eight (8) foot access aisle. The applicant's plans show one (1) ADA accessible parking stall that is nine (9) feet in width with an eight (8) foot access aisle. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 12 OF 24 Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The access drive has been addressed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation). Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. Pedestrian access has been discussed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation). Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The plans submitted show the associated parking stalls to be clearly marked with striping. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The applicant's plans show three (3) parking stalls located on the border of the subject site. Therefore, the applicant must provide and implement a plan showing the proposed three (3) parking stalls located on the boarder of the subject site to be fit with wheel stops that are at least four (4) inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The applicant's site plan shows that parking spaces will meet the minimum required dimensions for standard parking stalls (8.5 feet x 18.5 feet). Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 13 OF 24 Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. Bicycle parking for a motor vehicle servicing use is calculated at 0.2 spaces per 1,000 square feet. The applicant is proposing a forty two hundred (4,200) square foot oil change facility. Based on the requirement, the applicant is required to provide a total of two (2) bicycle parking stalls. The applicant has shown a two (2) stall bicycle rack that is located fifteen (15) feet from the southeastern main entrance to the building and is visible from SW Pacific Highway. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. The applicant has provided a detail of the bike rack to be used. The proposed bike rack will be securely anchored to the ground and is two and a half (2.5) feet by six (6) feet in length. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. The applicant is,proposing a forty two hundred (4,200) square foot building. According to Table 18.765.2 the minimum bicycle parking for a motor vehicle servicing use is calculated as 0.2 stalls per 1,000 square feet. The site is required to have a total of two (2) bicycle parking stalls. The applicant has proposed a two (2) stall bike rack. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. According to Table 18.765.2 (Minimum and Maximum Parking Requirements), the minimum parking for motor vehicle servicing uses is 2.0 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Based on the applicant's proposal for a 4,200 square foot oil change facility, the minimum required parking is eight (8) parking stalls. The maximum number of parking stalls allowed for the proposed use is nine (9) parkingstalls (2.3 spaces per 1,000 square feet). The applicant is proposing six (6) parking salls. The applicant has been conditioned earlier to provide two (2) additional parking stalls. Therefore, this criterion has been met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 14 OF 24 Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shallprovide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. The proposed oil change facility is approximately forty two hundred (4,200) square feet. The above standard refers to buildings that are ten thousand (10,000) square feet or larger. Therefore, no off-street loading space is required. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have not been fully met, however, if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be fully met: CONDITIONS: • Provide an additional two (2) parking stalls. • Provide and implement a plan showing the proposed three (3) parking stalls located on the boarder of the subject site to be fit with wheel stops that are at least four (4) inches high located three (3) feet back from the front of the parking stall. Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.D lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the MUE Zoning District. Signs are reviewed through a separate permit process administered by the Development Services Technicians. FINDING: Because signs will be reviewed and approved as part of a separate permit process, this standard has been satisfied. Tree Removal (18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. No trees have been proposed to be removed as part of this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the tree removal standards have been met. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. On all designated arterial streets the visual clearance area shall not be less than 35 feet on each side of the intersection. The proposed site plan does not show anything obstructing the visual clearance triangle along the SW Pacific Highway entrance to the site, which is the only effected access point. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 15 OF 24 FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the vision clearance standards have been met. C. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Bufferin , Screening, and Compatibility between Adjoining Uses; 18.360.090.13 (Parking); and 18.36090.14 (Provision for the Disabled). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees= topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. According to the plans submitted, no trees will be affected by the proposed development. There has been no evidence of slumping or sliding and the topography is relatively flat. The nearest building is approximately six (6)feet to the north. However, the building located on the adjacent property to the north is a storage facility with no windows. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (TVF&R) has commented on the proposal which did not indicate that the placement of the building would impede fire fighting ability for the subject or surrounding properties. No trees will be impacted by the placement of the proposed building. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Crime Prevention and Safety: • Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; • Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; • Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; • The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and • Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placedat a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. According to the site plan, the parking lot will be visible from a majority,of the building, and the sidewalk of SW Pacific Highway. However, the submitted plans do not indicate exterior lighting. Therefore, the applicant is required to submit a lighting plan to be approved by Jim Wolf of the Tigard Police Department. Public Transit: Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 16 OF 24 The site has frontage on SW Pacific Highway, which is a Tri-Met transit route. There is a pre-existing bus shelter approximately two hundred (200) feet to the east from the subject property on Pacific Highway. Comments were receivefrom the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) and no condition to add additional bus shelters was mentioned. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Landscaping_ All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.745; In addition to the open space and recreation area requirements of subsections 5 and 6 above, a minimum of 20 percent of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas shall be landscaped; and A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be landscaped. With the landscaping improvements shown on the proposed site plan, the percentage of gross area landscaped will be forty-six (46) percent or 8,334 square feet. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Provisions of the Underlying Zone: All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall applyunless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Dimensional Requirements: Provisions of the (C-G) General Commercial Zoning District have been addressed earlier in this decision under Section 18.520.040.B. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the specific standards of the Site Development Review Section have not been met. CONDTION: Submit a lighting plan to be approved by Jim Wolf of the Tigard Police Department. D. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS (18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a Portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a street classified as an arterial street to have a 104 right-of-way width and 72 foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Highway 99W, which is classified as an arterial on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. ODOT provided a list of Conditions of Approval in a letter transmitted to the City of Tigard on May 30, 2003. Among these conditions is the requirement for an ODOT approach permit, construction of curb and sidewalk along the frontage, an ODOT permit for work in their ROW and an ODOT drainage permit. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 17 OF 24 Highway 99W is an ODOT facility and sidewalks will be constructed under an ODOT permit and according to ODOT design standards, as per the ODOT letter dated May 30, 2003. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public line along the west property line of the site. The applicant shows that they wilt extend a new sewer lateral from this main to serve the new building. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There are no upstream drainage ways that impact this site. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by, the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plan shows they will convey the onsite runoff to an onsite detention pipe that then discharges to an ODOT facility to the north. ODOT will require the applicant to submit detention design and calculations to their offices for review and approval,per their letter dated May 30, 2003. The City must receive confirmation of ODOT approval prior to issuance of the site permit. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 18 OF 24 Highway 99W is classified as a bike facility. There is an existing bike lane along the frontage of this site. No additional bike lane improvements are necessary. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Traffic Study Findings: The Kittelson study indicates that this project will generate 190 net new daily trips. The existing easement onto Highway 99W will operate at acceptable volume-to-capacity and mobility standards during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours with the inclusion of traffic from this project. The report prepared by Kittelson further states that this project can be developed using the shared access easement and maintain acceptable levels-of-service on the surrounding transportation system. ODOT will need to review the Kittelson traffic study. The applicant will need to provide the City with an approved ODOT permit for this shared access easement. Public Water System: The site will be served by the City of Tigard. There is an existing public water main near the west ROW line of Highway 99W that the applicant will connect to for their new service. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established ly Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted byResolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water qualy facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet (he intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant's plan shows that the on-site stormwater runoff will be treated using a vegetated swale and a Stormwater Management catch basin filter. Staff reviewed -the calculations for the two systems and finds they will adequately serve this development. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employthe design engineer responsible Tor the design and specifications of the private water quality facility, to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspecion, the design en ineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. The proposed unit from Stormwater Management is acceptable, provided the property owner agrees to hire the manufacturer (or approved equal) to provide the required maintenance of the unit. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 19 OF 24 The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre of land A grading and erosion control plan will be reviewed and approved by the Building Division as a part of the site permit review. The site is less than one acre in size; therefore, an NPDES permit is not required. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issue of the site permit. E. IMPACT STUDY (18.390) Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:" Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an impact study addressing the project's impacts on public systems. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. The applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $8,832 based on the use proposed. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $27,600 ($8,832 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered the unmitigated impact on the collector and arterial street system. The unmitigated impact of this project on the transportation system is $18,768. The cost of the improvements is expected to be $12,100 (121 linear feet x $100.00 per foot for improvements) thus, as the required exactions are less than the value of the unmitigated impact, the exaction is roughly proportionate to the level of impact generated from this development. Therefore, the rough proportionality test has been satisfied SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and requested a lighting plan and indicated some concerns for the rear of the proposed structure. The City of Tigard Property Manager has reviewed the proposal and has no objection to it. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 20 OF 24 The City of Tigard Building Department has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: 1. Properties to be consolidated prior to Building Division review. 2. Rated walls and protected openings due to the location on the property, north and south walls. 3. Accessible walkway from accessible parking space to have a maximum running slope of 5% with a cross slope maximum of 2%. The City of Tigard Urban Forester has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: One comment on page L-1. Do not plant the sweet gums any closer to the sidewalk than what is shown on the plans seven (7) Sweet gums have very aggressive root systems and will lift any sidewalk, curbs or pavement that is typically with in 5 feet. The City of Tigard Water Department has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: 1. Existing water meter to have "Reduced pressure principle backflow device" installed directly behind meter. 2. Attach all details and notes. 3. Locate water meter in landscape area only. 4. Firm up on meter sizing prior to installing any vaults or meter boxes. 5. Provide necessary easements as required. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Clean Water Services (CWS) has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comment: • No CWS problems with land use action, final plans to be submitted to CWS for storm water connection permit and authorization. Oregon Department of Transportation has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: ODOT Standards According to the Oregon Highway Plan (1999), OR 99W is classified a Statewide Urban highway. The posted speed in this section is 40 miles per hour. ?Based on speed and classification, the access spacing standard is 990 ft. The mobility standard is 1.1 volume to capacity (v/c) ratio. ODOT Issues and Requirements The quick-lube facility proposes to access OR 99W through an existing approach on the adjacent property to the south, which currently contains a mix of uses, including a chiropractor and accounting office, and a church. According to OAR 734-051, the proposed development will result in a change of use of the highway access and a new ODOT Approach Road Permit is required. We recommend the City require the applicant to construct sidewalks to current ODOT/ADA standards along the property-s highway frontage. Recommended Conditions of Approval ODOT recommends the land use decision include the following Conditions of Approval to address applicable state and local approval criteria and ODOT permit requirements: 1. An ODOT approach permit is required for access to the state highway for the proposed use. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 21 OF 24 2. Curb and Sidewalk shall be constructed along the property's highway frontage to current ODOT/ADA standards. 3. An ODOT permit is required to perform all work in the highway right-of-way. 4. An ODOT drainage permit is required for connection to state highway drainage facilities. Connection will only be considered if the site's drainage naturally enters ODOT right-of-way. The applicant should provide ODOT District with a preliminary drainage plan. The plan should show any drainage impacts to the highway right-of-way. A drainage study prepared by an Oregon Registered Professional Engineer is usually required if: A. Total peak runoff entering the highway right-of-way is greater than .05 cubic meters per second; or B. The improvements create an increase of the impervious surface area greater than 1,000 square meters. Contact Paige Dickinson, ODOT District 2A Engineering Coordinator, at 503-229-5267 for information on the written permit application process. NW Natural Gas has reviewed the proposal and has no objection to it. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: 1) A separate permit from the Fire Marshal's Office is required for the flammable and/or combustible liquids tanks. Contact Eric McMullen at 503.612.7000. 2) PAINTED CURBS: Where required, fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted yellow and marked "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" at each 25 feet. Lettering shall have a stroke of not less than one inch wide by six inches high. Lettering shall be white on red or black on yellow background. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.2) 3) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM) or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi, whichever is less. A worksheet for calculating the required fire flow is available from the Fire Marshal's Office. (UFC Sec. 903.3) 4) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - FIRE HYDRANTS: No portion of the exterior of a commercial building shall be located more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant when measured in an approved manner around the outside of the building and along an approved fire apparatus access roadway. Any hydrants that are left over from the minimum number of hydrant calculations may be full filled by hydrants that are up to 500 feet from any point of the building. The fire Prevention Ordinance has further requirements that need to be used for acceptance and placement of fire hydrants. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1) 5) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - MINIMUM NUMBER OF FIRE HYDRANTS: The minimum number of fire hydrants for a building shall be based on the required fire flow prior to giving credit for fire protection systems divided by 1500. If the answer is equal to or greater than x.5 the next whole number of hydrants shall be used. There shall not be less than 2 hydrants per building. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1) Considerations for placing.fire hydrants shall be as follows: • Existinghydrants in the area may be used to meet the required number of hydrans; however, hydrants that are over 500 feet away from the nearest point of the subject building shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. • Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by railroad tracks shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. • Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by divided highway, freeway, or heavily traveled collector streets shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 22 OF 24 • Hydrants that are accessible only by a bridge shall be acceptable to contribute to the required number of hydrants only if approved by the Chief. • Private hydrants or public hydrants that are on adjacent private property shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants for the subject building. • Exception: The use of hydrants located on other private property may be considered if their locations and access are encumbered in a legal document (such as deed restriction) bythe owners of the involved parcels of property. The encumbrance may be lfted only after approvals by the Chief on behalf of the fire department and any other governmental agencies that mayrequire approval. • When evaluatin the placement of hydrants at apartmenor industrial complexes the first hydrant s) to be placed shall be at the primary access and any secondary access to the si e. After these hydrants have been placed other hydrants shall be sited to meet the above requirements for spacing and minimum number of hydrants. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1.1) 6) FIRE HYDRANT DISTANCE FROM AN ACCESS ROAD: Fire hydrants shall be located not more than 15 feet from an approved fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.4) 7) REFLECTIVE HYDRANT MARKERS: Fire hydrant_locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers. The markers shall be blue. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the centerline of the access road way that the fire hydrant is located on. In case that there is no center line, then assume a centerline, and place the reflectors accordingly. (UFC Sec. 901.4.3) 8) ACCESS AND FIRE FIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved fire apparatus access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any other construction on the site or subdivision. (UFC Sec. 8704) Please contact Eric McMullen at (503) 612-7010 with any additional questions. SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JULY 8,2003 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JULY 23, 2003 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 23 OF 24 Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 5:00 PM ON JULY 22 2003. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. =�. July 8, 2003 PREPARED :Y;,' Y ew ►.T' i -•ger DATE Associat- 'tanner dlihiI �_, .t.�. �� July 8, 2003 APPROV' D BY: Richard H. Be aorff DATE Planning Manager I:\curpin\mathew\sdr\SDR2003-00005.dec.doc.dot NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 24 OF 24 i I J 1 ) l I J GRAN �� G iv CITY of TIGARD r\- I JI1 '_____ *I,- 1111111 IS4 1110 AII--,_______,__- MEW. / . I 411g ok.1 COOK LN .1.? ........\ IN, u) ie z Y }MI 41 64 I I 01 ( /,...,_.,,,:fi-(wtRi., p 0 • , ► " ' \IRHAVEN ST , % I_ _ A 41kr �11W11.11� a---�`` Q-L; � ° � xoNl rA RD INr it eFNC�.. J:�}t M 1 R 11 SAF" : :. ''',X,',, ' ' �ill .(v f t -NI RHAVEN �J� •. Tigard Area Map I t *IN. 4111%‘,. • ! N '• 11111111111111W ' O\ 00 200 300 400 Feet II.RK PL = .iir� X11111 Q/ 324 feet 011 irmir HILL VIEW ST _�`1 0 ,411,11,61 City of Tigard ■� ■ V LU Q 0 Information on this map is for general location only and f1. _ should be verified with the Development Services Division. ■■ I 13125,O Hall Blvd I— D Tigard,OR 97223 OI (503)639-4171 1 http://vrvw.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:May 14,2003; C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR CITY Of TIZAITO '. / I ;\' 1` , v. I Iy� � z 0 °sir/ \\V � , / 1 1l'; �e r �. � j1 � 1 sr� li / 0 CD •X �� es,ocksorerr 1� ' 4'6 v I l ; j 1 1, Z '''.:& 1 • %of/1*V-' 1•.N'.N„ ! ' I 11/4 \ , or,-.:.?0,:\ \�\ N w,.‘,moo, s .v, .. s. .; ;� .. \� „ark,sem- \\ .,.=,..) Q•t \ 1,•,,. \moi`.-•:I El -r. 'L \\\� \\\\ \\� ''/ 1� re 4CASID.EN4E, .'&.kX$' zzy.)\..: .4° Neek8.410„, '. ..a 114 ' .7 z * / L9 /..:".:';*; /7 )5. \ -•,• • •-- '•-• • c- r &"*/ 1 tik : // �\ •\ < '�` ` � ads/ � � / O Go S�• • 4 l ' /Q;,V4 ♦I /• •• S/ / ,gyp / 44,1 1 i ♦ /&�'• 4 / I I`tr\=sl� i' I �� / 4441.. y 1 , � I �j • / / . ii , t 1 / o / i , ,1 1 1 ' ; 1 / \ \ 1 ' `ttl j I , / / 1 1 \ 1 1 1 i ' / /. 411 \ ; i \ jj , / 111 jy / \ j y / y/' / Ye / (I1Y OF TIGARD t SDR2003-00005 SITE PLAN (Map is not to scale) N QUICKLUBE NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION wri SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2003-00005 cirroFnoAeo Community c.Ueve(opment QUICKLUBE Shaping A Better Community 120 DAYS = 9/2/2003 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: QUICKLUBE CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2003-00005 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review to demolish an existing antique shop and construct a 3-bay oil change facility with associated parking and utilities. The property is approximately 21,780 square feet in size. APPLICANT: VMLK Consulting Engineers OWNER: DDHK, LLC. Attn: Jennifer Kimura Attn: Jim Horst 3933 SW Kelly Avenue 12604 SW 60th Court Portland, OR 97239 Portland, OR 97219 LOCATION: 13555 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S102CC, Tax Lots 600, 701 and 702. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a citywide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II . DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION ES FINAL ON JULY 8, 2003 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JULY 23, 2003 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning, issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON JULY 22, 2003. I Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheidegger at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. I_L_1 GRA O. •, 0111111111t,,,s `, VICINITY MAP 11114111I �, SDR2003-00005 PARK ST # 11 Air .� ��illQUICKLUBE 401111 OOK N l , G L ,#, , i , .. ill Jig 41RHAVEN TR ST ... r . k � ,_ v . J.,------- II ., �y ' . at _. . t '11RHAVEN it , �t. ,...... N 1%07, .RK , . o m .0 .. '� Q 132..1 l HILL VIEW ST Mod' h. ,l p ..1--,Is, oy ofTigard - r, 1312.W.MOW "�nm.n1 - o,a r..en. ,a 2009. ScSvlA IC03 APR ''..:4 !! 1!. ? WWWWWW 1 %'‘'' 1 J CI '•t*,,w. 1 1 I III 11 1 . '-',-...,,./ 0 i/i'..... II !!I 1 2 *'' '" ."1. ,J.,t� ----- �f. itt, z ' "* t a �¢ 1 �� ,\a w ,<0 c' .P 8 AZ- VI Q// _ B$ i A, / r �: . 1C 1- �, �. w ♦ � r•A‘ � / O �•: ,V vvv\\v! vv ' ••* ' 11 O ' CITY OF TIGARD T SDR2003-00005 sRc rou.a QUICKLUBE (Map is not to scale) NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENFIOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: May 15, 2003 FILE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2003-00005 Type II Land Use Application FILE NAME: QUICKLUBE PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review to demolish an existing antique shop and construct a 3-bay oil change facility with associated parking and utilities. The property is approximately 21,780 square feet in size. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. LOCATION: 13555 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S102CC, Tax Lots 600, 701 and 701. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THEM FOURTEEN„(14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5.00 PM.ON MAY29,,2003 All comments should be directed to Mathew Scheideqger, Assistant Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR JULY 1, 2003. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. , NA Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE,APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: • The application is accepted by the City • Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. • The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. • City Staff issues a written decision. • Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." I• LL' IT 1 GRA Loi' .. ' ' civ or ncnRo it.4 :':: ,,,, ■ , PARK ST PARK ST -,441 II # / .COOK LN ..„„, , 4G •0,p, ' I ... P •I oo , (HAVEN to ST •.It I NI ,iM (5 411,41:1��`� , ,, IRHAVEN f.„ ..01 .w.... i� a ��.1�1 N 'K PL I I o Sao �-v.� ¢ .Po... HILL VIEW ST A City of Tigard . Mal CP? I I D OM ,.n..ur .uPb oa .o..-. Cwnmnity evelppment Plot date:Mav 7a.2003:C:4naca0MAGIC03APR REQUEST FOR COMMENTS MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: 7/1/03 TO: Matthew Scheidegger, Assistant Planner FROM: Kim McMillan, Development Review Engineer RE: SDR 2003-00005, Quicklube Access Management (Section 18.705.030.H) Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO. A Transportation Impact Analysis was submitted by Kittelson & Associates, Inc., dated February 12, 2003. The study analyzed the Tigard Marketplace access intersection with Highway 99W, as well as the proposed site access easement. The applicant has indicated that access will be at the existing access easement located 155 feet south of the Tigard Marketplace intersection with Highway 99W. The analysis indicates that sight distance is adequate at the proposed access point on Highway 99W. Prior to final inspection the applicant's engineer will need to provide a final sight distance certification. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. The applicant is proposing to share the existing access to Highway 99W at milepost 10.05. An ODOT permit for new access will be required. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2003-00005 Quicklube PAGE 1 Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. Highway 99W is classified as an arterial, but is also an ODOT facility with limited access restrictions. Applicant is proposing to share the existing access at milepost 10.05. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a street classified as an arterial street to have a 104 right-of-way width and 72- foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Highway 99W, which is classified as an arterial on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. The applicant should contact ODOT for minimum ROW and improvement requirements. PLANNING Section 18.810.040.B.2 also states that bicycle and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-ways shall be provided when full street connection is not possible. Spacing between connections shall be no more than 330 feet, except where precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns, or strict adherence to other standards in the code. PLANNING ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2003-00005 Quicklube PAGE 2 Lots - Size and Shape: Section 18.810.060(A) prohibits lot depth from being more than 2.5 times the average lot width, unless the parcel is less than 1.5 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. PLANNING Lot Frontage: Section 18.810.060(B) requires that lots have at least 25 feet of frontage on public or private streets, other than an alley. In the case of a land partition, 18.420.050.A.4.c applies, which requires a parcel to either have a minimum 15-foot frontage or a minimum 15-foot wide recorded access easement. In cases where the lot is for an attached single-family dwelling unit, the frontage shall be at least 15 feet. PLANNING Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. Highway 99W is an ODOT facility and sidewalks will be constructed under an ODOT permit and according to ODOT design standards. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public line along the west property line of the site. The applicant shows that they will extend a new sewer lateral from this main to serve the new building. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2003-00005 Quicklube PAGE 3 Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There are no upstream drainage ways that impact this site. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plan shows they will convey the onsite runoff to an onsite detention pipe that then discharges to an ODOT facility to the north. ODOT will require the applicant to submit their detention design and calculations to their offices for review and approval. The City must receive confirmation of ODOT approval prior to issuance of the site permit. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2003-00005 Quicklube PAGE 4 Highway 99W is classified as a bike facility. There is an existing bike lane along the frontage of this site. No additional bike lane improvements are necessary. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Traffic Study Findings: The Kittelson study indicates that this project will generate 190 net new daily trips. The existing easement onto Highway 99W will operate at acceptable volume-to-capacity and mobility standards during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours with the inclusion of traffic from this project. The report prepared by Kittelson further states that this project can be developed using the shared access easement and maintain acceptable levels-of-service on the surrounding transportation system. ODOT will need to review the Kittelson traffic study. The applicant will need to provide the City with an approved ODOT permit for this shared access easement. Public Water System: The site will be served by the City of Tigard Water District. There is an existing public water main near the west ROW line of Highway 99W that the applicant will connect to for their new service. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant's plan shows that the on-site stormwater runoff will be treated using a vegetated swale and a Stormwater Management catch basin filter. Staff ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2003-00005 Quicklube PAGE 5 reviewed the calculations for the two systems and finds they will adequately serve this development. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. The proposed unit from Stormwater Management is acceptable, provided the property owner agrees to hire the manufacturer (or approved equal) to provide the required maintenance of the unit. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre of land A grading and erosion control plan will be reviewed and approved by the Building Division as a part of the site permit review. The site is less than one acre in size, therefore an NPDES permit is not required. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of$ 30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issue of the site permit. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2003-00005 Quicklube PAGE 6 Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: .Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover the sewer and water connections and any other work in the public right-of-way. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tiqard.or.us). The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work in the right-of-way of Highway 99W. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall provide the City Engineering Department a copy of the ODOT approved access permit. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the City Engineering Department must receive confirmation of ODOT approval of the stormwater detention system. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan)for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2003-00005 Quicklube PAGE 7 An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, December 2000 edition." THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: Prior to issuance of the building permit, additional right-of-way shall be conveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation, Highway Division, along the frontage of Highway 99W to increase the right-of-way to ODOT standards. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. Verification that the conveyance has been submitted to the State shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. (For additional information, contact Rick Reeves, Oregon Department of Transportation, Right-of-Way Section, 123 NW Flanders, Portland, OR 97209-4037; Phone: 731-8461). THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way (or public easement) and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2003-00005 Quicklube PAGE 8 Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall provide the City with as-built drawings of the public improvements as follows: 1) 3 mil mylar, 2) a diskette of the as-builts in "DWG"format, if available; otherwise "DXF"will be acceptable, and 3)the as-built drawings shall be tied to the City's GPS network. The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water valves, hydrants and other water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91). Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer, for the proposed onsite storm water treatment facility. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant's engineer shall provide a final sight distance certification. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR2003-00005 Quicklube PAGE 9 OF *nr\cn j- .o �� On Department of Transportation U x i j Region 1 123 NW Flanders /859 Theodore R.Kulongoski,Governor Portland, OR 97209-4037 (503) 731-8200 FAX (503) 731-8259 FILE CODE: May 30, 2003 PLA9--91 ODOT Case No: 1725 City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Attn: Mathew Scheidegger Subject: SDR2003-00005: Quicklube OR 99W and Park Street Dear Mr. Scheidegger, We have reviewed the applicant's proposal to demolish an existing store to erect three- Bay Quicklube. The site is adjacent to OR 99W. ODOT has permitting authority for this facility' and an interest in ensuring that the proposed land use is compatible with its safe and efficient operation. To ensure compatibility with state standards and requirements, we request the City of Tigard require the mitigation measures outlined below through conditions of approval. ODOT Standards According to the Oregon Highway Plan (1999), OR 99W is classified a Statewide Urban highway. The posted speed in this section is 40 miles per hour. Based on speed and classification, the access spacing standard is 990 ft. The mobility standard is 1.1 volume to capacity (v/c) ratio. ODOT Issues and Requirements The quick-lube facility proposes to access OR 99W through an existing approach on the adjacent property to the south, which currently contains a mix of uses, including a chiropractor and accounting office, and a church. According to OAR 734-051, the proposed development will result in a change of use of the highway access and a new ODOT Approach Road Permit is required. We recommend the City require the applicant to construct sidewalks to current ODOT/ADA standards along the property's highway frontage. OAR 734-051 website: http://arcweb.sos.state.or.us/rules/OARS_700/OAR_734/734_051.html Form 734-1850(1-03) City of Tigard; SDR2003-0C Quicklube 2 ODOT RESPONSE 5/30/2003 Recommended Conditions of Approval ODOT recommends the land use decision include the following Conditions of Approval to address applicable state and local approval criteria and ODOT permit requirements: 1. An ODOT approach permit is required for access to the state highway for the proposed use2. 2. Curb and Sidewalk shall be constructed along the property's highway frontage to current ODOT/ADA standards. 3. An ODOT permit is required to perform all work in the highway right of way3. 4. An ODOT drainage permit is required for connection to state highway drainage facilities4. Connection will only be considered if the site's drainage naturally enters ODOT right of way. The applicant should provide ODOT District with a preliminary diairiage plan. The plan should show any drainage impacts to the highway right of way. A drainage study prepared by an Oregon Registered Professional Engineer is usually required if: A. Total peak runoff entering the highway right of way is greater than .05 cubic meters per second; or B. The improvements create an increase of the impervious surface area greater than 1,000 square meters. Contact Paige Dickinson, ODOT District 2A Engineering Coordinator, at 503-229-5267 for information on the written permit application process. Thank you for coordinating with ODOT on this review. If you have questions regarding this matter, I can be reached at 5037318258. Please forward a copy of the Decision with Final Findings when it has been issued. Sincerely, Marah Danielson Development Review C: Paige Dickinson, ODOT, District Christian Snuffin, ODOT, Region 1 Traffic 2 OAR 734-051 website: http://arcweb.sos.state.or.us/rules/OARS_700/OAR_734/734_051.html 3 OAR 734-055 a OAR 734-051 website: http://arcweb.sos.state.or.us/rules/OARS_700/OAR_734/734_051.html A AR,., REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY oFnGo Community Devetopnaent Shapingaletter Community DATE: Maul 15,2001 �" nl MAY 1 6 2003 lJ TO: Lee Walker,JieaaWater Services/SWM Program FROM City of Tigard Planning Division By STAFI CONTACT: Mathew Scheldegger,Assistant Planner 1x2431) Phone: MOW 639.41111 Fax: (5031684-1297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 1SDRI 2003-00005 QUICNLUBE Q RE ZUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review to demolish an existing antique shi p and construct a 3-bay oil change facility with associated parking and utilities. The property is ap roximately 21,780 square feet in size. LOCATION: 13555 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S102CC, Ta Lots 600, 701 and 701. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is de igned to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional tra le area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences wh ch are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Cc rimunity Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18 765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Atte :,hed are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information sur )lied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report anc recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the ero.osal in the near future. if yoi. wish to comment on this application, W INEED '1 EI i IJ 1L A' ' •41200, Ci You ma use the space provided below or attach a separate letter o return your commen s. I you are unable to r spond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm yot. - comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Div Sion, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. lPil We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enc osed letter. Written comments provided below: I wA . moi. � � L I • !BM J. -� �. - . L a.. A A ' _l .* i1 .-i I i+�.� dame & Number of Person Commenting: lAk.C� -woe I SIA21aS 2IELVM hIYaD 5Z5c9fi8S05 XY73 LZ:90 CO/SO/90 . _ REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF IOARD Community Development Shaping f(Better Community DATE: May 15,2003 ‘i 19 TO: Scott Palmer,NW Natural Gas Engineering Coordinator ii)9 mOM: City of Ti�and Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Seheidogger,Assistant Planner fx2437J Phone: 1503)639.4111/Fax: (503)684-1297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SOB)2003-00005 > QIICKLUBE < REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review to demolish an existing antique shop and construct a 3-bay oil change facility with associated parking and utilities. The property is approximately 21,780 square feet in size. LOCATION: 13555 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S102CC, Tax Lots 600, 701 and 701. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District, The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the ro osal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WENEEk3',,YO Ow r., ENPiaa4 K i, it;:,MA 1129 2O 3 You may use the space provided below or attacF separate etter to return your comments, you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and-confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. Ifou have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE.FOI,.LOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY; '1 ', ' j-We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it, Please contact Please refer to the enc osed a er. of our office. _ Written comments provided below: �e 4.. e 7L /ergo i w er ?St pv.0 LI• d --P so -4/ f-r-4-0vc C W e4t, Name & Number of Person Commenting: / der /4/MI-14.--4Z l d 8S0 'ON 1090 :9 -E)H '6l 'AVW REQUEST FOR COMMENTSC.OFTIGARD Community Development Shaping A wetter Community DATE: May 15,2003 TO: Jim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner(x2431) Phone: (503)639-4111/Fax: [5031684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)2003-00005 ➢ QUICKLUBE < REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review to demolish an existing antique shop and construct a 3-bay oil change facility with associated parking and utilities. The property is approximately 21,780 square feet in size. LOCATION: 13555 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S102CC, Tax Lots 600, 701 and 701. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: MAY 29, 2003. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. / Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: i4TA5k \icer ` V(Jn Ca - eKk-exlciex o9 few of c'toRoqtr civkriskxe • Name & Number of Person Commenting: d .�a� X 2.50 as REQUEST FOR COMMENTSCITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: ay 15,2003 TO: n Roy,Property Manager/Public Works Annex FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner 1x24311 Phone: MOM 639-4111/Fax: MOM 684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)2003-00005 ➢ QUICKLUBE < REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review to demolish an existing antique shop and construct a 3-bay oil change facility with associated parking and utilities. The property is approximately 21,780 square feet in size. LOCATION: 13555 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S102CC, Tax Lots 600, 701 and 701. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: MAY 29, 2003. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLF,A�SE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: � We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name & Number of Person Commenting: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: May 15,2003 TO: Gary Lampella,Building Official FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner 1x24311 Phone: (503)639-4111/Fax (5031 684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR)2003-00005 ➢ QUICKLUBE < REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review to demolish an existing antique shop and construct a 3-bay oil change facility with associated parking and utilities. The property is approximately 21,780 square feet in size. LOCATION: 13555 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S102CC, Tax Lots 600, 701 and 701. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: MAY 29,2003. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. "c Written comments provided below: (�} PROPF/Ti6.1 TO ISE coMso` I DATCr PR/0/2 TO 13Uicr iNG, DIV/SioN ACV/ail. © RAW l'RGiS f PitoTTcT7O oPCNim/6-1" pvt To .ocATfo^J or' PRoPeRTy/ /P 4,./4") Co frcoCss c iD5 wm.. ,AY fRon Acc'S,siate .317AcG- ro NAYS= rAX,ffl#1 RONN/NG- s c oPE of 3" 70 w/f H A c RvsS s .oPP fl41./nurr of 2Z Name & Number of Person Commenting: 5411N 014,c00 6-ic 2y.3 111 REQUEST FOR COMMENTSCITY OF TIGARD Community(Development ShapingA Better Community DATE: May 15,2003 TO: Matt Stine,Urban Forester/Public Works Annex FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: a $ Assistant Planner 1x24311 Phone: (5031639-4111/Fax: 1503)684-1291 g i SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR]2003-00005 ➢ QUICKLUBE Q _ REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review to demolish an existing antique shop and construct a 3-bay oil change facility with associated parking and utilities. The property is approximately 21,780 square feet in size. LOCATION: 13555 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S102CC, Tax Lots 600, 701 and 701. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: MAY 29, 2003. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 9723. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Ow; COMMS)r 6/4! PAS L.—I - >0 NOT Pte, rt+E stitibW7K BMs Os C4osa 70 71+E S t.b EIA/ L k T ft f tNt !s 'Novi") oft) TILE PSS (:r) . S WEE74in,flus 4 RES I(vim jtooT 5 y MS W I W IA t:'r0004 441 s i b EWA-ugs C.i.t L oft P,-tiw fartrr YHA s rt Plc A-W01 Vs) l 1.1 S' . c kir r NC- Name & Number of Person Commenting: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS „,.. CITY OF TIGARD Community DeveCopment Shaping Better Community DATE: May 15,2003 TO: Dennis Koellermeier,Operations Manager/Water Department FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner[x24371 Phone: (5031639-4111/Fax: [503]684-7297 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR)2003-00005 > QUICKLUBE < REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review to demolish an existing antique shop and construct a 3-bay oil change facility with associated parking and utilities. The property is approximately 21,780 square feet in size. LOCATION: 13555 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S102CC, Tax Lots 600, 701 and 701. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: MAY 29;;2003. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. Ifou have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. x Written comments provided below: � 6( -/-)r1s 1 ..1(K �c t1' ?A t<�” 6dtietc/ fit' i,1/' ' , rr)t, t,a'4/ C'.r-c .k1`�-) /. u,4, /i) i-.Li'i " it7e ll., hti, ,,i ,'ce - U / 1 nuttJ ) . , ,.7. /,,;) /L!."' ,;,'J,f ''''i /. i) /..If/ f i" .Loi,-.6 .)6,/47,syi,°r<_ f) ) 1, of L l/J ,frt c 7 c bj /'I/711 o dh riltts' Sie ro j four 74) (nom- JC r., " zi i it, t/acc_1, of M e F' Sr o ✓t Cill,' {1'i S c''�^ G �J Gla. '/ '.,€ '1 i ✓ L(i!f cl J Name & Number of Person Commenting: ",. /v 0) ,02 MAY-21 03 10:23 FROM:PROJPLANNIN� 5039622281 TO:F-96847297 PACE:01 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OP110AAD Community cDeve1bpne1nt Shaping Better Community DATE: May 15,2003 TO: Ben Raidwln,Trl-MotTlransit Development Prolect Planner FROM: City of Tigard Plal In 0 en STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheldenuer,Assistant Planner 4124311 Phone: MOM 630,4111/Fax: 15081684-1291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MDR)2003-00005 QUICKLUBE Q _ REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review to demolish an existing antique shop and construct a 3-bay oil change facility with associated parking and utilities. The property is approximately 21,780 square feet in size. LOCATION: 13555 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S102CC, Tax Lots 600, 701 and 701. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the..roposall,in.the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, •' i' ; _ bw © � �' _ a S'= 9T20' You may use the space provided below or attac a separa e e'er o re urn your comments. you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and con irm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: 1 We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. of our office. Please contact Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name & Number of Person Commenting: 4114 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: May 15,2003 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger,Assistant Planner[x2437) Phone: 15031 639-4111/Fax: [503)684-7291 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)2003-00005 ➢ QUICKLUBE < REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review to demolish an existing antique shop and construct a 3-bay oil change facility with associated parking and utilities. The property is approximately 21,780 square feet in size. LOCATION: 13555 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S102CC, Tax Lots 600, 701 and 701. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on theroposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY:.MAY 29, 2003. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. Ifou have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name & Number of Person Commenting: CITY TIGARD REQUEST FOR CON, ANTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FILE NOS.: SDR a003 - OOOOSFILE NAME: C,L.,/fAJ(nS 0)3 C CLa,AV CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS 14-DAY PENDING APPLICATION NOTICE TO CIT AREAentral ❑East ['South ['West E✓JProposal Descrip.in Library CIT Book CITY OFFICES _LONG RANGE PLANNING/Barbara Shields,Planning Mgr. OMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPTJPIanning-Engineering Techs. /POLICE DEPTJJim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer .(BUILDING DIVISION/Gary Lampella,Building Official _I/ENGINEERING DEPT./Brian Rager,Dvlpmnt.Review Engineer 'WATER DEPTJDennis Koellermeier,Operations Mgr. _CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder . PUBLIC WORKS/John Roy,Property Manager _w4CUBLIC WORKS/Matt Stine,Urban Forester ✓PLANNER—POST PROJECT SITE IF A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM-10 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING! _C.DJSherman Casper,Permit Coord.(soRvcuP re:TIF) SPECIAL DISTRICTS _ TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.*_/fUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE* TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* 4/CLEANWATER SERVICES* Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Lee Walker/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Avenue Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON* _ CITY OF TUALATIN* _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS _ Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue Jennifer Goodridge Irish Bunnell,Development Services 18880 SW Martinazzi Avenue PO Box 59 775 Summer Street NE PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Salem,OR 97301-1279 Beaverton,OR 97076 _ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING* OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE _ CITY OF DURHAM* 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 _ Bob Knight,Data Resource Center(ZCA) US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. Kathryn Harris _ Mel Huie,Greenspaces Coordinator(CPA2oA) Larry French(Comp.Plan Amendments Only) Routing CENWP-OP-G _CITY OF KING CITY* _ Jennifer Budhabhatti,Regional Planner(Wetlands) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 PO Box 2946 City Manager _ C.D.Manager,Growth Management Services Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946 15300 SW 116th Avenue King City,OR 97224 WASHINGTON COUNTY _ OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(Powedines in Area) _OR.DEPT OF AVIATION(Monopole Towers) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Tom Highland,Planning 155 N.First Avenue _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO* Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Ferrera 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 _Brent Curtis(CPA) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Gregg Leion(CPA) OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) OT,REGION 1 * _Anne LaMountain(lcwuRe) _CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) JD Danielson,Development Review Coordinator Phil Healy)IGA URe) Planning Bureau Director Regional Administrator _Carl Toland, Right-of-Way Section(vacations) _Steve Conway(General Apps.) 1900 SW 4th Avenue,Suite 4100 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders _Sr.Cartographer(CPAZCA)MS 1e Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 _Jim Nims(ZCA)MS 15 _Doria Mateja(ZCA)MS 14 _WA.CO.CONSOLIDATED COMMUNIC.AGENCY(WCCCA)"911"(Monopole Towers) _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A* Dave Austin Jane Estes,Permit Specialist PO Box 6375 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 Beaverton,OR 97007-0375 Portland,OR 97221-2414 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES _PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northern/Santa Fe RJR Predecessor) Robert I.Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W.10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _AT&T CABLE TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations Only) Pat McGann (It Project is Within'A Mile of a Transit Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 181 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street B averton,OR 97006-4886 P rtland,OR 97232 PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY �VERIZON WEST COMMUNICATIONS Ken Gutierrez,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. Ken Perdue,Engineering Patty Stambaugh,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue PO Box 1100 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 110 Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97075-1100 Portland,OR 97219 _TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 _COMCAST CABLE CORP. _AT&T CABLE(App.E.o1HallNor99W) Marsha Butler,Administrative Offices Jan Youngquist,Demographics Melody Malone Diana Carpenter 6960 SW Sandburg Street 16550 SW Merlo Road 9605 SW Nimbus Avenue,Bldg.12 3500 SW Bond Street Tigard,OR 97223-8039 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Beaverton,OR 97008 Portland,OR 97232 * INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN 500' OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANY/ALL CITY PROJECTS(Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). h:\patty\masters\Request For Comments Notification List 2.doc (Revised: 3/25/03) PT JANNING SECRETARY MATERIALS AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING OF TIGARD Community reveCopment Shaping Better Community , Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of gigar, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: {Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) ❑x NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked EXhlbit"A",and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked EXhlblt"B and by reference made a part hereof, on May 15,2003,and deposited in the United States Mail on May 15,2003, postage prepaid. L.; 111111116. 41.1.1J �.� • 'd7 (Per in hat P--pared Notice) I S2AA OE OkEGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) Subscribed and sworn/aff ed before me on the / 7 day of , 2003. :r, OFFICIAL SEAL B �J j; ;��. J ENGTSONVi- NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON tl COMMISSION NO.368086 NOTARY PUBLIC OF-OREGON ll� COMMISSION EXPIRES APR.27,2007AO)lamY MMY My Commission Expires: EXHIBIT A NOTICE TO MORTGAGEE, LIENHOLDER,VENDOR OR SELLER: THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRES THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE,IT SHALL BE PROMPTLY FORWARDED TO THE PURCHASER. NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY OF TIGARD Community cDevelopment Shaping A Better Community DATE OF NOTICE: May 15, 2003 FILE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2003-00005 Type II Land Use Application FILE NAME: QUICKLUBE PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review to demolish an existing antique shop and construct a 3-bay oil change facility with associated parking and utilities. The property is approximately 21,780 square feet in size. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. LOCATION: 13555 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S102CC, Tax Lots 600, 701 and 701. YOUR RIGHT TO PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the City making any decision on the Application, you are hereby provided a fourteen (14) day period to submit written comments on the application to the City. THE FOURTEEN (14) DAY PERIOD ENDS AT 5:00 PM ON MAY 29, 2003. All comments should be directed to Mathew Scheidegger, Assistant Planner in the Planning Division at the City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. You may reach the City of Tigard by telephone at (503) 639-4171. ALL COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF TIGARD IN WRITING PRIOR TO 5:00 PM ON THE DATE SPECIFIED ABOVE IN ORDER FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE CITY OF TIGARD APPRECIATES RECEIVING COMMENTS AND VALUES YOUR INPUT. COMMENTS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND ADDRESSED WITHIN THE NOTICE OF DECISION. A DECISION ON THIS ISSUE IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR JULY 1, 2003. IF YOU PROVIDE COMMENTS, YOU WILL BE SENT A COPY OF THE FULL DECISION ONCE IT HAS BEEN RENDERED. WRITTEN COMMENTS WILL BECOME A PART OF THE PERMANENT PUBLIC RECORD AND SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: • Address the specific "Applicable Review Criteria" described in the section above or any other criteria believed to be applicable to this proposal; • Raise any issues and/or concerns believed to be important with sufficient evidence to allow the City to provide a response; • Comments that provide the basis for an appeal to the Tigard Hearings Officer must address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity on that issue. Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Specific findings directed at the relevant approval criteria are what constitute relevant evidence. AFTER THE 14 DAY COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES, THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A TYPE II ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT AND TO OWNERS OF RECORD OF PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE, AND TO ANYONE ELSE WHO SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENTS OR WHO IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO NOTICE. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION SHALL ADDRESS ALL OF THE RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA. BASED UPON THE CRITERIA AND THE FACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE RECORD, THE DIRECTOR SHALL APPROVE,APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENY THE REQUESTED PERMIT OR ACTION. SUMMARY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: • The application is accepted by the City • Notice is sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the proposed development area allowing a 14-day written comment period. • The application is reviewed by City Staff and affected agencies. • City Staff issues a written decision. • Notice of the decision is sent to the Applicant and all owners or contract purchasers of record of the site; all owners of record of property located within 500 feet of the site, as shown on the most recent property tax assessment roll; any City-recognized neighborhood group whose boundaries include the site; and any governmental agency which is entitled to notice under an intergovernmental agreement entered into with the City which includes provision for such notice or anyone who is otherwise entitled to such notice. INFORMATION/EVIDENCE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: The application, written comments and supporting documents relied upon by the Director to make this decision are contained within the record and are available for public review at the City of Tigard Community Development Department. Copies of these items may be obtained at a cost of $.25 per page or the current rate charged for this service. Questions regarding this application should be directed to the Planning Staff indicated on the first page of this Notice under the section titled "Your Right to Provide Written Comments." GRA - LcT y •ELL 1111CT� . :.N 4 VICINITY MAP 1 _ If II Il Il �, l_ �I j �I�� 1 1 if °,,eS I ` �� SDR2003-00005 PARK ST J � I r--T___ __� _ PARK ST T f TTT l i— I I _� l QUICKLUBE I ±J I o — 1 _COOK LN i� , Irli I I I Qp N it L__ � ISITE ,I I It - 1 r I IKI I I~ s:-gip/ • • c 4IRHAVEN EL 1 IST 1 I z 5 U FAIRHAVEN .ktC' ..4 _..., ,,1 16 ,,,, ,..11 •• N 1 MI °CC AIR _KPL\ I I 1 ITi I I IN o °° ro°°r.r«°° .00 = f I a H I F _ HILL VIEW ST \ City of Tigard CammuniN Oevalapment Plot date Mav 14 2003.C:MacicNMGIC03 APR 2S102CC-00500 2S102CC-01200 EXHIBIT A 13500 PACIFIC CORP INTERNATIONAL CHURCH OF THE FOUR BY CAPOZZOLI ADVISORY FOR 1910 W SUNSET BLVD#200 PENSIONS INC LOS ANGELES,CA 90026 21500 HAGGERTY ROAD SUITE ICO NORTHVILLE,MI 48167 2S 102CB-01802 2S 102CC-00702 BAR-AM LLC KOCH KELLY& BY GODFATHER'S PIZZA DAVIDSON JENNIFER 1905 NW 169TH PL#201 13565 SW PACIFIC HWY BEAVERTON,OR 97006 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1030A-05900 2S102CC-00600 BISHOP WILBUR A AND MARTHA E KOCH KELLY& PO BOX 23832 DAVIDSON JENNIFER TIGARD,OR 97281 13565 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 103DA-06200 2S 102CC-01000 BLAIR BARRY V&LINDA F KUBIN CARON 13490 SW WATKINS AVE 520 SW 6TH AVE#400 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97204 2S 103DD-00200 2S 103D D-00437 CEARLEY DARRELL A& LOUCKS HARLOW C&COLLEEN ANGELA M 13605 SW WATKINS AVE 13530 SW WATKINS AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 103DD-00433 2S 103DA-04701 CHAMBERLAIN JOHN A AND MOAR PATRICIA C TRUSTEE DEBRA A 4114 SW FLOWER ST 10710 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY PORTLAND,OR 97221 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 102CC-00701 2S 103DA-04702 DDHK VENTURES LLC MOAR PATRICIA C TRUSTEE 12604 SW 60TH CT 4114 SW FLOWER ST PORTLAND,OR 97219 PORTLAND,OR 97221 2S 103DD-00700 2S 1030A-04900 GILBERTSON LLOYD MURFINSIMMONS MATTHEW T& DARLENE J MICAHLE 15980 SW COLONY PLACE 13365 SW WATKINS TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DA-06000 2S103DA-05602 HOLCOMBE GERALD A& NGUYEN TUYET-MAI THI& BELINDA M TRAN VAN BINH 13485 SW WATKINS ST 13434 SW 107TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 102CC-00700 2S 1030A-05600 HORTON DENNIS M&ELISABETH A O'DEA PATRICIA J 19220 VIEW DR 13472 SW 107TH AVE WEST LINN,OR 97068 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1030D-00401 2S103DD-00402 OWENS JOHN W&DEBORAH A SPANIOL MICHAEL R&CAROLYN S 13525 SW WATKINS 10605 SW FAIRHAVEN ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 103DA-06100 2S 103D D-00435 PAPEN CINDY&DAN STEVENS WILLIAM A&SARAH E 13450 SW WATKINS ST 10650 SW FAIRHAVEN ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DA-05603 2S103DD-00600 PHILLIPS RICHARD F TIGARD GRANGE NO. 148 10676 SW COOK LN BY PHILIP R.YOUNT TREASURER TIGARD,OR 97223 11222 COTTONWOOD LANE TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 102CB-01800 2S 102CC-01100 PUBLIC STORAGE TIGARD LODGE NO.207 INSTITUTIONAL FUND OF AF&AM DEPT PT-OR26410 ATTN JOHN HAVERY SECY PO BOX 25025 P 0 BOX 230184 GLENDALE,CA 91201 TIGARD,OR 97281 2S 103DA-04600 2S 103DA-04800 PUGSLEY CLAYTON A& URL JOY B FREEMAN-PUGSLEY CAMIE 13370 SW WATKINS 10570 SW PARK ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DA-05800 2S103DA-04700 RESLER MICHAEL D&BARBARA S URL JOY B 10620 SW COOK LN 13370 SW WATKINS TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 103DA-05000 2S 103DD-00100 ROSSBERG STEPHEN A VITIRITTI PIETRO&PASQUALINA 10605 SW COOK LN TRUSTEES TIGARD,OR 97223 14115 SW 157TH TIGARD,OR 97224 2S103DD-00300 2S103DD-00436 RUTAN DAVID G AND LORI WARD MARION M 13570 SW WATKINS AVE 10600 SW FAIRHAVEN TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 103DD-00403 2S 102CB-01804 SCHMIERER MICHAEL J AND WEBER COASTAL BELLS LIMITED BARBARA L WEBER EDUARD 10645 SW FAIRHAVEN ST 840 CONGER ST TIGARD,OR 97223 EUGENE,OR 97402 2S103DA-05700 2S103DA-05100 SHOLES LANCE M& WILLIAMS DAVID S ALFANO KRISTEN A 10635 SW COOK LN 10634 SW COOK LN TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DD-00500 WILSON'S TIGARD RETAIL CENTER IN BY BOMCC ESCROW ADMINISTRATION TX1-2495 1717 MAIN ST 12TH FLOOR- DALLAS,TX 75201 2S103DD-00400 WILSON'S TIGARD RETAIL CENTER IN BY BOMCC ESCROW ADMINISTRATION TX1-2495 1717 MAIN ST 12TH FLOOR- DALLAS,TX 75201 2S 103D D-00434 ZANDONATTI ALLEN F 10680 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY TIGARD,OR 97223 VMLK CONSULTING ENGINEERS ATTN: JENNIFER KIMURA 3933 SW KELLY AVENUE PORTLAND, OR 97239 Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive#4 Tigard, OR 97224 Brooks Gaston 10272 SW Meadow Street Tigard, OR 97223 Don & Dorothy Erdt 13760 SW 121st Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Martha Bishop 10590 SW Cook Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Vanessa Foster 13085 SW Howard Drive Tigard, OR 97223 Susan Beilke 11755 SW 114th Place Tigard, OR 97223 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Patricia Keerins 12195 SW 121st Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - CENTRAL CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT Central.doc) UPDATED: November 27, 2002 CONSULTING P 503.222.4453 !MUM— ENGINEERS F 503.248.9263 E vlmk@vlmk.com 3933 SW Kelly Avenue • Portland • Oregon 97201-4393 W www.vlmk.com February 11, 2003 City of Tigard, Oregon Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223-8189 RE: Quicklube Tigard - Site Design Review Submittal Existing: This project consists of one existing building that is presently an Antique and Cabinet Refinishing Store. This building will be demolished to make way for the new proposed Auto Lube facility (see below). The remainder of the site consists of a parking lot and vacant field. Proposed: The applicant is proposing to construct a new 4,200 sf. Auto Lube facility in the location of the existing Antique Store. Along with the new building will be a parking lot to serve the new facility. This Site Design Review Submittal includes a set of plans on 30" x 42" that indicate the proposed design for the new facility. It also includes an 8 1/2" x 11" package of information required by the City. Please refer to the Table of Contents in this package that list the items included in the submittal. Zoning: This project is zoned CG (General Commercial). Pre-Application Compliance: The following is a list of items from the Pre-Application Conference Report dated 12/05/02: --1 I Heading Requirement Compliance Zoning • Various percentages • Comply with all percentages Dimensional and setbacks. and setbacks. Requirements Neighborhood Notify neighbors and conduct Owner has completed this meeting meeting. requirement - see attached copies of meeting minutes. ' Narrative Submit with application. This document is the Narrative. Impact Study Submit copy to city. Included in this submittal. Access Pavement widths, queuing See Site Plan for compliance areas, etc. Structural Engineering • Civil Engineering • Industrial Engineering • Planning • Studies / Evaluations • Entitlement Walkway From entry to public street See Site Plan for compliance Requirements Buffering and 15.0' abutting residential See Landscape Plan for compliance screening Landscaping Street trees are required Two have been shown that work with ODOT criteria (see sheet L-1). Parking (5) Spaces required (6) Are indicated on the Site Plan Bicycle parking (2) Required (2) Are indicated on Site Plan CWS Letter application required See attached letter Signs Permit required To be handled by Owner Tree Removal Must mitigate existing trees to See L-1 for new trees. requirements be removed Mitigation See tree removal above See tree removal above. Clear vision area 3 to 8 feet of clear area See L-1 for compliance Additional Concerns or Comments: Joint access with See Site Plan and Traffic Impact adjoining Report for compliance property Need cross-over See Site Plan and Traffic Impact easement Report for compliance 50 foot stacking See Site Plan for compliance Engineering Section: R-O-W Check with ODOT to see if it is ODOT indicates that it is NOT Dedication required required. Street Curb, sidewalk, planter strip See Site Plan for compliance Improvements and street trees Sanitary Sewer Connect new building to city See Site Utility Plan for compliance Sanitary Water Service Connect to city water See Site Utility Plan for compliance Fire Service Contact Tualatin Valley for Will coordinate with TVFD during next requirements or questions phase - this is just preliminary utilities Storm Sewer Verify detention requirements See Site Utility Plan for compliance and submit storm design Water Quality Verify requirement and/or fee See Site Utility Plan for compliance Other Comments Traffic Study? See attached copy TIF fees Verify with city Will coordinate with city Permits Review for types required Will coordinate with city AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OF TIGARD Community®eve(opment Shaping Better Community I, cPatricia L. Lun fora being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) 0 NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No./Name Reference) ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked EXhibit'T',and by reference made a part hereof, on lalY 8,2003,and deposited in the United States Mail on NO 8,2003, postage prepaid. (Person th rep: -• • ice) STATE OE OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of'Tigard Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the - day of-'' t , 2003. OFFICIAL SEAL r .41TJ BENGTSON / 1 �• ;,#r�' NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON / , ��%f` ) COMMISSION NO.368086 t) MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APR.27,2007 ' I ' I I 41 I ' I MY Commission Expires: #?7/6 EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2003-00005 CITY OF TIGARD QUICKLUBE Community Development Shaping Better Community 120 DAYS = 9/2/2003 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: QUICKLUBE CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2003-00005 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review to demolish an existing antique shop and construct a 3-bay oil change facility with associated parking and utilities. The property is approximately 21,780 square feet in size. APPLICANT: VMLK Consulting Engineers OWNER: DDHK, LLC. Attn: Jennifer Kimura Attn: Jim Horst 3933 SW Kelly Avenue 12604 SW 60th Court Portland, OR 97239 Portland, OR 97219 LOCATION: 13555 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S102CC, Tax Lots 600, 701 and 702. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a citywide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request for Site Development Review subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 1 OF 24 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Planning Division (Mathew Scheidegger, 639-4171, ext. 2437) for review and approval: 1. Provide documentation in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts that establish joint use of the existing access point. 2. Provide cross over easements for the three (3) parcels that are associated with the proposal. 3. Provide documentation that an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) Approach Road Permit has been acquired. 4. Provide a plan showing street trees along SW Pacific Highway in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 (Size and Spacing of-Street Trees). Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: 5. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover the sewer and water connections and any other work in the public right-of-way (ROW). Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and the City's web page (www.ci.tigard.or.us). 6. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership, LLC, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 7. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work in the right-of-way of Highway 99W. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. 8. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall provide the City Engineering Department a copy of the ODOT approved access permit. 9. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the City Engineering Department must receive confirmation of ODOT approval of the stormwater detention system. 10. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 11. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, December 2000 edition." NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 2 OF 24 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT: Submit to the Planning Division (Mathew Scheidegger, 639-4171, ext. 2431) tor review and approval: 12. Address one1) of the four (4) methods of mixed solid waste and recyclable storage according to Section 18.755.040 (Methods of Demonstrating Compliance). 13. Provide information regarding the design standards of the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables section of the Tigard Development Code (TDC). THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: Submit to the Planning Division (Mathew Scheidegger, 639-4171, ext. 2437) for review and approval: 14. Provide an additional two (2) parking stalls. 15. Provide and implement a plan showing the proposed three (3) parking stalls located on the boarder of the subject site to be fit with wheel stops that are at least four (4) inches high, located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. 16. Submit a lighting plan to be approved by Jim Wolf of the Tigard Police Department. Submit to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan, 639-4171, ext. 2642) for review and approval: 17. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way (or public easement) and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. 18. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water qualityfacility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Wtkins, Building Division. 19. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer, for the proposed onsite storm water treatment facility. 20. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant's engineer shall provide a final sight distance certification. 21. Prior to final approval, sidewalk and curb must be constructed according to ODOT standards. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 3 OF 24 SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History Two minor modification decisions were found associated with the existing building (antique furniture)). The first was to add a four hundred eighty (480) square foot addition to the existing building (MMD1999-00018) and the second was to add an additional ten (10) parking stalls to the parking area. No other land-use cases were found. Vicinity Information The subject site is located on the north side of SW Pacific Highway between SW Park and Watkins Streets. Property to the north is zoned C-G (General Commercial) and is developed with commercial uses. Property to the west is zoned R-3.5 (Low Density Residential) and is currently developed with single-family homes. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review approval to demolish an existing antique shop and construct a 3-bay oil change facility with associated parking and utilities. The property is approximately 21,780 square feet in size. SECTION IV. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET All neighbors within 500 feet of the proposal were given the opportunity to comment on the proposal. No neighborhood comments were received. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA A. Zoning Districts 18.520 (Commercial Zoning Districts) B. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.705 Access Egress and Circulation) 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards) 18.745 Landscaping and Screening) 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage) 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements) 18.780 Signs 18.790 Tree Removal) 18.795 Visual Clearance) C. Specific DR Approval Criteria 18.360 D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 E. Impact Study 18.390 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS A. ZONIING DISTRICT Commercial Zoning District: Section 18.520.020 Lists the description of the Commercial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the C-G zoning district: General Commercial. Development Standards: Section 18.520.040.B States that Development standards in Commercial Zoning Districts are contained in Table 18.520.2 below: NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 4 OF 24 TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES STANDARD C-G, Proposed, Minimum Lot Size None 21,780 sq.ft. Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. 115 ft. Minimum Setbacks -Front yard Oft[11] 36 ft. -Side facing street on corner&through lots[1] - - -Side yard 0/20 ft[8] 0-3 ft. --Rear yard 0/20 ft[8] 55 ft. -Distance between front of garage&property line abutting a public or private street. - - Minimum Building Height N/A N/A Maximum Height 45 ft 40 ft. Maximum Site Coverage[2] 85% 40% Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 46% Minimum FAR N/A N/A Minimum Residential Density[4][5][6] N/A N/A Maximum Residential Density N/A N/A 1]The provisions of Chapter 18.795(Vision Clearance)must be satisfied. [2]Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [4] Notwithstanding the requirements of Section 18.715.020,minimum and maximum density shall be determined for residential only projects using the number of residential units per acre shown in the above table. The provisions for density transfer described in Section 18.715.030.8 apply, using the minimum and maximum density shown in the above table.Any mixed-use or commercial only development does not have a minimum density requirement. [5] For purposes of determining floor area ratio and residential densities,the net development area shall be uses to establish the lot area,determined per Section 18.715.020.A. [6] Adjustments to minimum density in the Washington Square Regional center area subject to the standards set forth in Section 18.630.020.E. [8]No setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. [11]There shall be no minimum front yard setback requirement;however,conditions in Chapters 18.745 and 18.795 must be met. As demonstrated in the table above, the applicant's plans comply with the dimensional standards of the C-G zone. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Development Standards criteria have been satisfied. B. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS The Site development Review approval standards require that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.360, 18.630, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795, and 18.810. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. Access, Egress and Circulation (18.705): Access plan: No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. The subject site will be using the existing driveway off of SW Pacific Highway in order to access the site. The access drive is also used for the adjacent property to the southwest. Specific criteria which pertain to access are addressed under Chapter 18.705 (Access, Egress and Circulation). Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 5 OF 24 Joint access: Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: Satisfactorylegal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracs to establish the joint use; and copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. As mentioned above, the subject site will take access from an existing driveway that is used by the adjoining property to the southwest. The proposed oil change facility and associated parking is located on three separate parcels. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide documentation in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contract agreements that establishes joint use of the existing access point. The applicant will also be required to provide cross over easements for the three (3) parcels that are associated with the proposal. Public street access: All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.0301 shall connect directly with a public or private street approvedby the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. The subject site is accessible from SW Pacific Highway, which is a public street that will be maintained as a public street. Therefore, this standard has been met. Curb cuts: Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030N: Concrete curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps anddriveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080: Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required; except where no sidewalk is planned, an asphalt approach may be constructed with City Engineer approval and Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shall be built to City configuration standards. No driveway approach shall be less than five feet from the side property line projected except in cul-de-sacs, without approval and written permission of the city. The end slopes may encroach within the five foot restricted area. No portion of any driveway approach, including the end slopes, shall be located closer than thirty feet to an intersection street right-of-way line. Commercial or service drives shall not be more than thirty feet in width and if located on the same lot frontage shall be separated by a minimum length of curb of thirty feet. Each residential driveway shall be not more than twenty-six feet in width includingend slopes, and if more than one driveway is to be constructed to serve the same lo , the frontage spacing between such driveways shall be not less than thirty feet measured along the curb line. Joint access driveways shall conform to the appropriate width standard for commercial or residential type usage. The access to the site is pre-existing. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Walkways: On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; The applicant has shown a five (5) foot walkway that extends from the southeast side of the proposed building to the sidewalk along SW Pacific Highway. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 6 OF 24 Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or_parking lots such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot "horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; The proposed walkway does not cross a vehicle access point or a parking lot. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. The applicant's plan shows the pedestrian walkway from the subject building to be concrete. Therefore, this criterion has been satisfied. Access Management (Section 18.705.030.H) Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT,Washington County, the City and AASHTO. A Transportation Impact Analysis was submitted by Kittelson & Associates, Inc., dated February 12, 2003. The study analyzed the Tigard Marketplace access intersection with Highway 99W, as well as the proposed site access easement. The applicant has indicated that access will be at the existing access easement located 155 feet south of the Tigard Marketplace intersection with Highway 99W. The analysis indicates that sight distance is adequate at the proposed access point on Highway 99W. Prior to final inspection the applicant's engineer will need to provide a final sight distance certification. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be 150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may,be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. The applicant is proposing to share the existing access to Highway 99W at milepost 10.05. An ODOT permit for new access will be required. Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. Highway 99W is classified as an arterial, but is also an ODOT facility with limited access restrictions. The applicant is proposing to share the existing access at milepost 10.05, which is approximately 190 feet from the access of the adjoining property to the north. The above standard requires driveways along an arterial to be spaced 600 feet apart. However, the subject sites access is pre-existing. Therefore, the driveway spacing standard does not apply. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 7 OF 24 Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.1_provides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.705.3 indicates that the required access width for developments with 0-99 parking spaces is one 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The required parking for the proposed oil change facility is eight (8) parking stalls. Based on the above standard, the applicant is required to provide one access drive that is thirty (30) feet in width. The existing access drive is forty-seven (47) feet in width. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. One-way vehicular access points: Where a proposed parking facility indicates only one-way traffic flow on the site, it shall be accommodated by a specific driveway serving the facility; the entrance drive shall be situated closest to oncoming traffic and the exit drive shall be situated farthest from oncoming traffic. The existing access drive is designed for two-way traffic. Therefore, this standard does not apply. The Director has the authority to restrict access when the need to do so is dictated by one or more of the following conditions: To provide for increased traffic movement on congested streets and to eliminate turning movement problems, the Director may restrict the location of driveways on streets and require the location of driveways be placed on adjacent streets, upon the finding that the proposed access would: • Cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions; or • Provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles; or • Cause hazardous conditions to exist which would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare. To eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide for parking area connections; To facilitate pedestrian and bicycle traffic, access and parking area plans shall provide efficient sidewalk and/or pathway connections, as feasible, between neighboring developments or land uses; The access to the subject property is pre-existing and is not considered hazardous or constitutes a clear and present danger to the public health. Standards for access as well as for fire and life safety are discussed elsewhere in this decision (Section VIII. Agency Comments). Therefore, no access restriction is required. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Access, Egress and Circulation standards have not been met. CONDITION: • Provide documentation in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts that establish joint use of the existing access point. • Provide cross over easements for the three (3) parcels that are associated with the proposal. • Provide documentation that an ODOT Approach Road Permit has been acquired. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 8 OF 24 Environmental Performance Standards (18.725): Noise: For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.40.130 through 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. Visible emissions: Within the commercial zoning districts and the industrial park (IP) zoning district, there shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack of other point- source emission from space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water (steam) which is visible from a property line. Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) rules for visible emissions (340-21-015 and 340-28-070) apply. Vibration: No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. Odors: The emission of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply. Glare and heat: No direct or sky-reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted and; there shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and these regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or constructingequipment at the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title. Insects and rodents: All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. The proposed use is an oil change facility which is an outright permitted use within the C-G zoning district. There is no indication within the application that these standards will not be met. However, ongoing efforts to meet these standards shall be maintained and any violation of these standards will be addressed by the City of Tigard's Code Enforcement Officer. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Environmental Performance Standards have been met. Landscaping and Screening (18.745): Street Trees: Section 18.745.040 states that all development projects fronting on a public street or a private drive more than 100 feet in length shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 Section 18.745.040.0 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The subject site has one hundred twenty three (123) feet of frontage on SW Pacific Highway. According to the standard, parcels which front onto a public street for a distance greater than one hundred (100) feet must provide street trees spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart. Spacing of street trees depends on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). Therefore, the applicant is required to provide a plan showing street trees along SW Pacific Highway in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 (Size and Spacing of Street Trees). NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 9 OF 24 Buffering and Screening: Section 18.745.080 states that no buffer is required between abutting uses that are of a different type when the uses are separated by a street. No buffer is required between a proposed office use and existing office use. According to the Development Code, the only buffering and screening required is between the associated parking lot and the residential properties to the northwest, which is discussed below under the Special Provisions section of this decision. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopyeffect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet wide and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. As indicated on the site plan, the associated parking lot is located between the proposed quicklube site and the abutting R-3.5 residential zoning district to the northwest. The applicant has proposed to screen the parking area with a fifteen (15) foot landscaped area which will consist of a combination of Cornus Alba (Tatarian Dogwood) shrubs, Cupressocyparis Leylandii (Cupressaceae) evergreen trees, existing deciduous trees and Arctostaphylos Uva-Ursi assachusetts Kinnikinnick) ground cover. The proposed fifteen (15) foot landscaped area will be located at the property line which is separated from the residential homes by a six (6) foot high wood fence. The applicant has also proposed an additional eight (8) to ten (10) foot landscaped area surrounding the proposed parking area. Plantings include a combination of Buxus microphylla, Curnus Alba, Fraxinus Oxycarpa (Flame Ash) trees, and Massachusetts Kinnikinnick. Based on the analysis above, the applicant has met the criterion. Screening Of Service Facilities: Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; Screening of Service Facilities is addressed under Chapter 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage). FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have not been met. CONDITION: Provide a plan showing street trees along SW Pacific Highway in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0 (Size and Spacing of Street Trees). Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Regardless of which method chosen, the applicant will have to submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the facility location and compatibility. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 10 OF 24 The applicant's site plan shows a ninety one (91) square foot mixed solid waste enclosure. However, the applicant has not addressed one (1) of the four (4) methods of compliance for mixed solid waste and recyclables. Therefore, the applicant is required to address one (1) of the four (4) methods of mixed solid waste and recyclable storage according to Section 18.755.040 (Methods of Demonstrating Compliance). Location Standards: To encourage its use, the storagearea for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. The applicant's site plan shows the proposed trash enclosure to be located within the northern interior side yard and will not effect pedestrian or vehicular movement. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Design Standards: The dimensions of the storagearea shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. The proposed trash enclosure will have a thirteen (13) foot gated entrance. However, the applicant has not addressed the design standards of the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage Section of the Tigard Development Code. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide evidence that the proposed trash enclosure meets the design standards of the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables section of the Tigard Development Code. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage Standards have not been met. CONDITIONS: • Address one (1) of the four (4) methods of mixed solid waste and recyclable storage according to Section 18.755.040 (Methods of Demonstrating Compliance). • Provide information regarding the design standards of the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables section of the Tigard Development Code. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765): Location of vehicle parking: Off-streetarking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 11 OF 24 the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up.to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. Based on the proposed motor vehicle servicing use, the total number of required parking stalls is based off of 2.0/1,000 square feet. The proposed buildingis shown to be 4,200 square feet. Therefore, the minimum required parking for the site is eigh (8). The applicant's plans show a total of six (6) parking stalls located adjacent to the building. Therefore, the applicant is required to provide an additional two (2) parking stalls. Joint Parking: Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1) The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be ,presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3),If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. Joint parking has not been proposed with this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Visitor Parking in Multi-Family Residential Developments: Multi-dwelling units with more than 10 required parking spacesshall provide an /o additional 15 of vehicle parking spaces above the minimum required for the use of guests of residents of the complex. These spaces shall be centrally located or distributed throughout the development. Required bicycle parking facilities shall also be centrally located within or evenly distributed throughout the development. This project does not involve a multi-family use. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Preferential Long-Term CarpoolNanpool Parking: Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. The proposed use is vehicle servicing with drive-through bays. Therefore, the parking associated with the use is considered short-term and is not required to have car/vanpool parking. Disabled-Accessible Parking: All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The subject site is required to provide a minimum of eight (8) parking stalls. According to ADA standards, parking lots with 1 to 25arking stalls must provide I ADA accessible stall that is nine (9) feet wide with an eight (8) foot access aisle. The applicant's plans show one (1) ADA accessible parking stall that is nine (9) feet in width with an eight (8) foot access aisle. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 12 OF 24 Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The access drive has been addressed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation). Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. Pedestrian access has been discussed previously in this decision under Chapter 18.705 (Access Egress and Circulation). Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family.and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The plans submitted show the associated parking stalls to be clearly marked with striping. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The applicant's plans show three (3 parking stalls located on the border of the subject site. Therefore, the applicant must provide and implement a plan showing the proposed three (3) parking stalls located on the boarder of the subject site to be fit with wheel stops that are at east four (4) inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parkingin Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. The applicant's site plan shows that parking spaces will meet the minimum required dimensions for standard parking stalls (8.5 feet x 18.5 feet). Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 13 OF 24 Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050 states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. Bicycle parking for a motor vehicle servicing use is calculated at 0.2 spaces per 1,000 square feet. The applicant is proposing a forty two hundred (4,200) square foot oil change facility. Based on the requirement, the applicant is required to provide a total of two (2) bicycle parking stalls. The applicant has shown a two (2) stall bicycle rack that is located fifteen (15) feet from the southeastern main entrance to the building and is visible from SW Pacific Highway. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Bicycle Parking Design Requirements: Section 18.765.050.C. The following_ designrequirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required or required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchoreto the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicleyparking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. The applicant has provided a detail of the bike rack to be used. The proposed bike rack will be securely anchored to the ground and is two and a half (2.5) feet by six (6) feet in length. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. The applicant is.proposing a forty two hundred (4,200) square foot building. According to Table 18.765.2 the minimum bicycle parking for a motor vehicle servicing use is calculated as 0.2 stalls per 1,000 square feet. The site is required to have a total of two (2) bicycle parking stalls. The applicant has proposed a two (2) stall bike rack. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. According to Table 18.765.2 (Minimum and Maximum Parking Requirements), the minimum parking for motor vehicle servicing uses is 2.0 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Based on the applicant's proposal for a 4,200 square foot oil change facility, the minimum required parking is eight (8) parking stalls. The maximum number of parking stalls allowed for the proposed use is nine (9) parking stalls (2.3 spaces per 1,000 square feet). The applicant is proposing six (6) parking stalls. The applicant has been conditioned earlier to provide two (2) additional parking stalls. Therefore, this criterion has been met. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 14 OF 24 Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall.provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. The proposed oil change facility is approximately forty two hundred (4,200) square feet. The above standard refers to buildings that are ten thousand (10,000) square feet or larger. Therefore, no off-street loading space is required. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have not been fully met, however, if the applicant complies with the conditions listed below, the standards will be fully met: CONDITIONS: • Provide an additional two (2) parking stalls. • Provide and implement a plan showing the proposed three (3) parking stalls located on the boarder of the subject site to be fit with wheel stops that are at least four (4) inches high located three (3) feet back from the front of the parking stall. Signs (18.780): Chapter 18.780.130.D lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the MUE Zoning District. Signs are reviewed through a separate permit process administered by the Development Services Technicians. FINDING: Because signs will be reviewed and approved as part of a separate permit process, this standard has been satisfied. Tree Removal (18.790): Section 18.790.030 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing treesor mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. No trees have been proposed to be removed as part of this application. Therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the tree removal standards have been met. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. On all designated arterial streets the visual clearance area shall not be less than 35 feet on each side of the intersection. The proposed site plan does not show anything obstructing the visual clearance triangle along the SW Pacific Highway entrance to the site, which is the only effected access point. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 15 OF 24 FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the vision clearance standards have been met. C. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090(A)(2) through 18.360.090(A)(15) provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: 18.360.090.3 (Exterior Elevations); 18.360.090.5 (Privacy and Noise: Multi-family or Group Living Uses); 18.360.090.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Multi-family Use); 18.360.090.8 (100-year floodplain); and 18.360.090.9 (Demarcation of Spaces). The following sections were discussed previously in this decision and, therefore, will not be addressed in this section: 18.360.090.4 (Bufferin , Screening. and Compatibility between Adjoining Uses; 18.360.090.13 (Parking); and 18.36090.14 (Provision for the Disabled). Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Buildings shall be: located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Trees shall be preserved to the extent possible. Replacement of trees is subject to the requirements of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal. According to the plans submitted, no trees will be affected by the proposed development. There has been no evidence of slumping or sliding and the topography is relatively flat. The nearest building is approximately six (6) feet to the north. However, the building located on the adjacent property to the north is a storage facility with no windows. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (TVF&R) has commented on the proposal which did not indicate that the placement of the building would impede fire fighting ability for the subject or surrounding properties. No trees will be impacted by the placement of the proposed building. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Crime Prevention and Safety: • Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; • Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; • Mail boxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; • The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and • Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placedat a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet, which is sufficient to illuminate a person. According to the site plan, the parking lot will be visible from a majority of the building, and the sidewalk of SW Pacific Highway. However, the submitted plans do not indicate exterior lighting. Therefore, the applicant is required to submit a lighting plan to be approved by Jim Wolf-of the Tigard Police Department. Public Transit: Provisions within the planshall be included for providing for transit if the development roposal is adjacent to existing or proposed transit route; the requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: the location of other transit facilities in the area; and the size and type of the proposal. The following facilities may be required after City and Tri-Met review: bus stop shelters; turnouts for buses; and connecting paths to the shelters. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 16 OF 24 The site has frontage on SW Pacific Highway, which is a Tri-Met transit route. There is a pre-existing bus shelter approximately two hundred (200) feet to the east from the subject property on Pacific Highway. Comments were received from the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) and no condition to add additional bus shelters was mentioned. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Landscaping: All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.745; In addition to the open space and recreation area requirements of subsections 5 and 6 above, a minimum of 20 percent of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas shall be landscaped; and A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be landscaped. With the landscaping improvements shown on the proposed site plan, the percentage of gross area landscaped will be forty-six (46) percent or 8,334 square feet. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied. Provisions of the Underlying Zone: All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title, e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 1-8.350; or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Dimensional Requirements: Provisions of the (C-G) General Commercial Zoning District have been addressed earlier in this decision under Section 18.520.040.B. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the specific standards of the Site Development Review Section have not been met. CONDTION: Submit a lighting plan to be approved by Jim Wolf of the Tigard Police Department. D. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS (18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any newstreet or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030.E requires a street classified as an arterial street to have a 104 right-of-way width and 72-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Highway 99W, which is classified as an arterial on the City of Tigard Transportation Plan Map. ODOT provided a list of Conditions of Approval in a letter transmitted to the City of Tigard on May 30, 2003. Among these conditions is the requirement for an ODOT approach permit, construction of curb and sidewalk along the frontage, an ODOT permit for work in their ROW and an ODOT drainage permit. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 17 OF 24 Highway 99W is an ODOT facility and sidewalks will be constructed under an ODOT permit and according to ODOT design standards, as per the ODOT letter dated May 30, 2003. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. There is an existing 8-inch public line along the west property line of the site. The applicant shows that they will extend a new sewer lateral from this main to serve the new building. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There are no upstream drainage ways that impact this site. Therefore, this standard does not apply. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated bythe City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. The applicant's plan shows they will convey the onsite runoff to an onsite detention pipe that then discharges to an ODOT facility to the north. ODOT will require the applicant to submit detention design and calculations to their offices for review and approval.per their letter dated May 30, 2003. The City must receive confirmation of ODOT approval prior to issuance of the site permit. Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways: Bikeway Extension: Section 18.810.110.A states that developments adjoining proposed bikeways identified on the City's adopted pedestrian/bikeway plan shall include provisions for the future extension of such bikeways through the dedication of easements or right-of-way. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 18 OF 24 Highway 99W is classified as a bike facility. There is an existing bike lane along the frontage of this site. No additional bike lane improvements are necessary. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Traffic Study Findings: The Kittelson study indicates that this project will generate 190 net new daily trips. The existing easement onto Highway 99W will operate at acceptable volume-to-capacity and mobility standards during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours with the inclusion of traffic from this project. The report prepared by Kittelson further states that this project can be developed using the shared access easement and maintain acceptable levels-of-service on the surrounding transportation system. ODOT will need to review the Kittelson traffic study. The applicant will need to provide the City with an approved ODOT permit for this shared access easement. Public Water System: The site will be served by the City of Tigard. There is an existing public water main near the west ROW line of Highway 99W that the applicant will connect to for their new service. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established IN Clean Water Services ICWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to construction the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of the CWS Design Standards. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. The applicant's plan shows that the on-site stormwater runoff will be treated using a vegetated swale and a Stormwater Management catch basin filter. Staff reviewed -the calculations for the two systems and finds they will adequately serve this development. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water qualityfacility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection , the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. The proposed unit from Stormwater Management is acceptable, provided the property owner agrees to hire the manufacturer (or approved equal) to provide the required maintenance of the unit. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, rading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 19 OF 24 The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre of land A grading and erosion control plan will be reviewed and approved by the Building Division as a part of the site permit review. The site is less than one acre in size; therefore, an NPDES permit is not required. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard and within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). An addressing fee in the amount of $30.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the City prior to issue of the site permit. E. IMPACT STUDY (18.390) Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:" Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Section 18.390.040 states that when a condition of approval requires the transfer to the public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. The applicant has provided an impact study addressing the project's impacts on public systems. The Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) is a mitigation measure that is required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. The applicant will be required to pay TIF's of approximately $8,832 based on the use proposed. Based on the estimate that total TIF fees cover 32 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this projects traffic impact is $27,600 ($8,832 divided by .32). The difference between the TIF paid, and the full impact, is considered the unmitigated impact on the collector and arterial street system. The unmitigated impact of this project on the transportation system is $18,768. The cost of the improvements is expected to be $12,100 (121 linear feet x $100.00 per foot for improvements) thus, as the required exactions are less than the value of the unmitigated impact, the exaction is roughly proportionate to the level of impact generated from this development. Therefore, the rough proportionality test has been satisfied. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and requested a lighting plan and indicated some concerns for the rear of the proposed structure. The City of Tigard Property Manager has reviewed the proposal and has no objection to it. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 20 OF 24 The City of Tigard Building Department has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: 1. Properties to be consolidated prior to Building Division review. 2. Rated walls and protected openings due to the location on the property, north and south walls. 3. Accessible walkway from accessible parking space to have a maximum running slope of 5% with a cross slope maximum of 2%. The City of Tigard Urban Forester has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: One comment on page L-1. Do not plant the sweet gums any closer to the sidewalk than what is shown on the plans seven (7) Sweet gums have very aggressive root systems and will lift any sidewalk, curbs or pavement that is typically with in 5 feet. The City of Tigard Water Department has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: 1. Existing water meter to have "Reduced pressure principle backflow device" installed directly behind meter. 2. Attach all details and notes. 3. Locate water meter in landscape area only. 4. Firm up on meter sizing prior to installing any vaults or meter boxes. 5. Provide necessary easements as required. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Clean Water Services (CWS) has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comment: • No CWS problems with land use action, final plans to be submitted to CWS for storm water connection permit and authorization. Oregon Department of Transportation has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: ODOT Standards According to the Oregon Highway Plan (1999), OR 99W is classified a Statewide Urban highway. The posted speed in this section is 40 miles per hour. ?Based on speed and classification, the access spacing standard is 990 ft. The mobility standard is 1.1 volume to capacity (v/c) ratio. ODOT Issues and Requirements The quick-lube facility proposes to access OR 99W through an existing approach on the adjacent property to the south, which currently contains a mix of uses, including a chiropractor and accounting office, and a church. According to OAR 734-051, the proposed development will result in a change of use of the highway access and a new ODOT Approach Road Permit is required. We recommend the City require the applicant to construct sidewalks to current ODOT/ADA standards along the property-s highway frontage. Recommended Conditions of Approval ODOT recommends the land use decision include the following Conditions of Approval to address applicable state and local approval criteria and ODOT permit requirements: 1. An ODOT approach permit is required for access to the state highway for the proposed use. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 21 OF 24 2. Curb and Sidewalk shall be constructed along the property's highway frontage to current ODOT/ADA standards. 3. An ODOT permit is required to perform all work in the highway right-of-way. 4. An ODOT drainage permit is required for connection to state highway drainage facilities. Connection will only be considered if the site's drainage naturally enters ODOT right-of-way. The applicant should provide ODOT District with a preliminary drainage plan. The plan should show any drainage impacts to the highway right-of-way. A drainage study prepared by an Oregon Registered Professional Engineer is usually required if: A. Total peak runoff entering the highway right-of-way is greater than .05 cubic meters per second; or B. The improvements create an increase of the impervious surface area greater than 1,000 square meters. Contact Paige Dickinson, ODOT District 2A Engineering Coordinator, at 503-229-5267 for information on the written permit application process. NW Natural Gas has reviewed the proposal and has no objection to it. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed the proposal and has offered the following comments: 1) A separate permit from the Fire Marshal's Office is required for the flammable and/or combustible liquids tanks. Contact Eric McMullen at 503.612.7000. 2) PAINTED CURBS: Where required, fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted yellow and marked "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" at each 25 feet. Lettering shall have a stroke of not less than one inch wide by six inches high. Lettering shall be white on red or black on yellow background. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.2) 3) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM) or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi, whichever is less. A worksheet for calculating the required fire flow is available from the Fire Marshal's Office. (UFC Sec. 903.3) 4) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - FIRE HYDRANTS: No portion of the exterior of a commercial building shall be located more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant when measured in an approved manner around the outside of the building and along an approved fire apparatus access roadway. Any hydrants that are left over from the minimum number of hydrant calculations may be full filled by hydrants that are up to 500 feet from any point of the building. The fire Prevention Ordinance has further requirements that need to be used for acceptance and placement of fire hydrants. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1) 5) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - MINIMUM NUMBER OF FIRE HYDRANTS: The minimum number of fire hydrants for a building shall be based on the required fire flow prior to giving credit for fire protection systems divided by 1500. If the answer is equal to or greater than x.5 the next whole number of hydrants shall be used. There shall not be less than 2 hydrants per building. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1) Considerations for placing.fire hydrants shall be as follows: • Existing hydrants in the area may be used to meet the required number of hydrants; however, hydrants that are over 500 feet away from the nearest point of the subject building shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. • Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by railroad tracks shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. • Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by divided highway, freeway, or heavily traveled collector streets shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 22 OF 24 • Hydrants that are accessible only by a bridge shall be acceptable to contribute to the required number of hydrants only if approved by the Chief. • Private hydrants or public hydrants that are on adjacent private property shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants for the subject building. • Exxcce tion: The use of hydrants located on other private property may be considered if their locations and access are encumbered in a legal document (such as deed restriction) by the owners of the involved parcels of property. The encumbrance may be lifted only after approvals by the Chief on behalf of the fire department and any other governmental agencies that may require approval. • When evaluatin the placement of hydrants at apartment or industrial complexes the first hydrants) to be placed shall be at the primary access and any secondary access to the si e. After these hydrants have been placed other hydrants shall be sited to meet the above requirements for spacing and minimum number of hydrants. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1.1) 6) FIRE HYDRANT DISTANCE FROM AN ACCESS ROAD: Fire hydrants shall be located not more than 15 feet from an approved fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.4) 7) REFLECTIVE HYDRANT MARKERS: Fire hydrant_locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers. The markers shall be blue. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the centerline of the access road way that the fire hydrant is located on. In case that there is no center line, then assume a centerline, and place the reflectors accordingly. (UFC Sec. 901.4.3) 8) ACCESS AND FIRE FIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved fire apparatus access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any other construction on the site or subdivision. (UFC Sec. 8704) Please contact Eric McMullen at (503) 612-7010 with any additional questions. SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JULY 8, 2003 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JULY 23, 2003 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 23 OF 24 Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL,IS AT 5:00 PM ON JULY 22, 2003. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. July 8, 2003 PREPARED -Y• F ew .1-- •-••er DATE Associat- 'Tanner 41 I Pri _�_� to.. , fi July 8, 2003 APPROV' D BY: Richard H. Be a orff DATE Planning Manager 1:\cu rpin\nmathew\sd r\S DR2003-00005.dec.doc.dot NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE PAGE 24 OF 24 Y\ I I I �— GRAN \ /.Pr 0 ' CITY of TIGARD Y\ DERRY DELL CT CT C�`C ` \� 4 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM VICINITY MAP • \ SDR2003-00005 PARK ST PARK ST 111h4 QUICKLUBE ___________ MI. / Allit461111111.11111r wI . COOK LN G�\G 110.e QP CN z • Y ,,,, rf 0 ♦ c � Ho SIR III .�► • o, „ ›. .,., , /., >; E HAVEN ST or IP° ` ;� I : ,,T, wI - ,i_,,,,:/„„,„ • 310„,.-610_57,4"_, ., ., _ ,Ul +r Rrrl _e kr ,A J_ J.40pAhr, I . s5(F3C Jnl...:.✓f i-'' M HG j�'J .1,41 e<141111114C) 111 ® Tigard Area Map �,f �I RHAVEN PAVIIII• N lik*AMIr 46 ,RK PL 0L� 0 100 200 300 400 Feet I) „'1 ir 11. < 1,•=324 feet 11, HILL VIEW ST A 11.111111, 117 o City of Tigard -< 0 Information on this map is for general location only and ■ 2' - should be verified with the Development Services Division. I 13125 SW Hall Blvd g; < \ \ Tigard,OR 97223 I r (503)639-4171 / CZ) m http://www.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date: May 14,2003;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR A. CITY OF TIGARD o { 1 I/ 1 / ''' \ \./' \\, OZ ,;/ /.\ \ )' CO 0 4° \\\ ' 1 I 1 'R N6j / \,, • tis °e...114,44,,,_, ,,,,,,��Oa`! •CDs \ fel a . Ev r %\ ;•� y s.a 7 \\,,.. Q !, 1��9 \ \ / \�£ i,F.' yf �\\�\ \\\\ ✓ 9s it ONS'"E.R \\ FDS }'1h// �` \ / . , Y.e` �I,T ♦®\\ /� aye_Ti. \\\ �/ .IC \ '/ \ (�. T': <.\\��'Or/S V <_4,4 / . \ Sod@ \y� CS.''' 'Z(:) / / b �� QTR 4:0C4":). /. / .' te• / , •o c\ KZ.' \ N° I s /V 1101. e • TP / t qi1 \ �1 �� v 761' =4 f V. /` ! / •/a, � I }� T \\\ \\ 4 /' /. • 41 /.,,4.9‘ / ,' ll\ / b0� • \\\\\\\\ • /� , I 4 ' I { �� lll� , 77'• / • \/ / • ; tx „<:. X1 / / �, / CITY OF TIGARD 1 SDR2003-00005 SITE PLAN QUICKLUBE (Map is not to scale) N VMLK Consulting Engineers Attn: Jennifer Kimura SDR2003-00005 EXHIBITs,6 3933 SW Kelly Avenue QUICKLUBE Portland, OR 97239 DDHK, LLC. Attn: Jim Horst 12604 SW 60th Court Portland, OR 97219 Marah Danielson, Development Review ODOT, Region 1 123 NW Flanders Portland, OR 97209-4037 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CITY OFTIGARD Community Development Shaping (etterCommunity I, 'Patricia L. Lun fora being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specia(ut for the City of Tigard, 'Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) 0 NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: SDR2003-00005/QUICKLUBE ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File NoJName Reference) City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked EAhibit"A",and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit"B",and by reference made a part hereof, on July 8,2003,and deposited in the United States Mail on July 8,2003, postage prepaid. (P:fr: . .tP -..red ,otice)� STATE oq'o GoN ) County of Washington )ss. City of ward ) I 2003. Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the "' day o ' , � OFFICIAL SEAL Vlp q J BENGTSON • NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO. MY COMMISSION EXPIRESIBES APR. 2007 �'APR.27, NOTA'Y PUBLIC*i REGON MY Commission Expires: 7`p-7/6 EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2003-00005 CITY OFTIGARD Community cDeve(opment QUICKLUBE skapingA Better Community 120 DAYS = 9/2/2003 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: QUICKLUBE CASE NO.: Site Development Review (SDR) SDR2003-00005 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review to demolish an existing antique shop and construct a 3-bay oil change facility with associated parking and utilities. The property is approximately 21,780 square feet in size. APPLICANT: VMLK Consulting Engineers OWNER: DDHK, LLC. Attn: Jennifer Kimura Attn: Jim Horst 3933 SW Kelly Avenue 12604 SW 60th Court Portland, OR 97239 Portland, OR 97219 LOCATION: 13555 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S102CC, Tax Lots 600, 701 and 702. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a citywide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II . DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the full decision, available at City Hall. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. All documents and applicable criteria in the above-noted file are available for inspection at no cost or copies can be obtained for twenty-five cents (25 ) per page, or the current rate charged for copies at the time of the request. SECTION III. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION is FINAL ON JULY 8, 2003 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JULY 23, 2003 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. tkpagAli The Director's Decision is final on the date that it is mailed. All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the Notice of Decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning, issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. I THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON JULY 22, 2003. I Questions: For further information please contact the Planning Division Staff Planner, Mathew Scheidegger at (503) 639-4171, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. GRAN Illu N -1 .... .............Kn cv rt u<n ELL.TT , CT 71 \ VICINITY �_D�RR / ,. ITY MAP I 1 1 I F-� � 1 —I I ' I I -H,_ ` �I j i I I ' 1 r i II \0 SDR2003-00005 1 1 I-- , _�__I_ __— 1 r • PARK ST PARK_ S ' / / QUICKLUBE 11 II L_ I I COI OK LN �� 1 L_ H— . SITE i 1 i I '1110 IRHAVEN _ ST I I I i n'9,. 11 I ,/)_ 1 1 � I 1 /3 �� -1IRHAVEN IIIITTTIlt--- -----7 I / �. N 1 4I \ I _ HILL VIEW ST ��. -li )— P tI \/ �—tir-- - �� o I \ Cary of Tigard I -I N 2I / f- / f I uu Pord....s no.OM. ---- �� I�T1 D I m.�.�.... ori w ' wm..,m.,� n .I,eeto 2003:C'.MaAicUMGIC03,APR r,.mm„nnV n.oa.m.a ./ / Z i z 4� %/ 11.\.>" , .� ,,, U ■'?'' Res ' U .40, A. i P'I I \11 1 , • •v.' ' ' / • 11I '11 �, . ' i / 11'11 1 ' Ili, 11A ` ' ' 1 I,I11 ,111 \I'1 r i i II / , Y i CITYOF TIGARD s0x2003-00005 strum vI A QUICKLUBE (Map is not to scale) 2S102CC-00500 2S102CC-01200 EXHIBIT. /1 13500 PACIFIC CORP INTERNATIONAL CHURCH OF THE FOUR BY CAPOZZOLI ADVISORY FOR 1910 W SUNSET BLVD#200 PENSIONS INC LOS ANGELES,CA 90026 21500 HAGGERTY ROAD SUITE 100 NORTHVILLE,MI 48167 2S102CB-01802 2S102CC-00702 BAR-AM LLC KOCH KELLY& BY GODFATHER'S PIZZA DAVIDSON JENNIFER 1905 NW 169TH PL#201 13565 SW PACIFIC HWY BEAVERTON,OR 97006 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1030A-05900 2S102CC-00600 BISHOP WILBUR A AND MARTHA E KOCH KELLY& PO BOX 23832 DAVIDSON JENNIFER TIGARD,OR 97281 13565 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DA-06200 2S102CC-01000 BLAIR BARRY V&LINDA F KUBIN CARON 13490 SW WATKINS AVE 520 SW 6TH AVE#400 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97204 2S103DD-00200 2S1030D-00437 CEARLEY DARRELL A& LOUCKS HARLOW C&COLLEEN ANGELA M 13605 SW WATKINS AVE 13530 SW WATKINS AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DD-00433 2S103DA-04701 CHAMBERLAIN JOHN A AND MOAR PATRICIA C TRUSTEE DEBRA A 4114 SW FLOWER ST 10710 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY PORTLAND,OR 97221 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-00701 2S103DA-04702 DDHK VENTURES LLC MOAR PATRICIA C TRUSTEE 12604 SW 60TH CT 4114 SW FLOWER ST PORTLAND,OR 97219 PORTLAND,OR 97221 2S1030D-00700 2S103DA-04900 GILBERTSON LLOYD MURFINSIMMONS MATTHEW T& DARLENE J MICAHLE 15980 SW COLONY PLACE 13365 SW WATKINS TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 103DA-06000 2S 103DA-05602 HOLCOMBE GERALD A& NGUYEN TUYET-MAI THI& BELINDA M TRAN VAN BINH 13485 SW WATKINS ST 13434 SW 107TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-00700 2S103DA-05600 HORTON DENNIS M&ELISABETH A ODEA PATRICIA J 19220 VIEW DR 13472 SW 107TH AVE WEST LINN,OR 97068 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 2S103DD-00401 2S103DD-00402 OWENS JOHN W&DEBORAH A SPANIOL MICHAEL R&CAROLYN S 13525 SW WATKINS 10605 SW FAIRHAVEN ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DA-06100 2S103DD-00435 PAPEN CINDY&DAN STEVENS WILLIAM A&SARAH E 13450 SW WATKINS ST 10650 SW FAIRHAVEN ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DA-05603 2S103DD-00600 PHILLIPS RICHARD F TIGARD GRANGE NO. 148 10676 SW COOK LN BY PHILIP R.YOUNT TREASURER TIGARD,OR 97223 11222 COTTONWOOD LANE TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CB-01800 2S102CC-01100 PUBLIC STORAGE TIGARD LODGE NO.207 INSTITUTIONAL FUND OF AF&AM DEPT PT-OR26410 ATTN JOHN HAVERY SECY PO BOX 25025 P 0 BOX 230184 GLENDALE,CA 91201 TIGARD,OR 97281 2S1030A-04600 2S103DA-04800 PUGSLEY CLAYTON A& URL JOY B FREEMAN-PUGSLEY CAMIE 13370 SW WATKINS 10570 SW PARK ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DA-05800 2S103DA-04700 RESLER MICHAEL D&BARBARA S URL JOY B 10620 SW COOK LN 13370 SW WATKINS TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DA-05000 2S103DD-00100 ROSSBERG STEPHEN A VITIRITTI PIETRO&PASQUALINA 10605 SW COOK LN TRUSTEES TIGARD,OR 97223 14115 SW 157TH TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 103DD-00300 2S 1030D-00436 RUTAN DAVID G AND LORI WARD MARION M 13570 SW WATKINS AVE 10600 SW FAIRHAVEN TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S10300-00403 2S102CB-01804 SCHMIERER MICHAEL J AND WEBER COASTAL BELLS LIMITED BARBARA L WEBER EDUARD 10645 SW FAIRHAVEN ST 840 CONGER ST TIGARD,OR 97223 EUGENE,OR 97402 2S103DA-05700 2S103DA-05100 SHOLES LANCE M& WILLIAMS DAVID S ALFANO KRISTEN A 10635 SW COOK LN 10634 SW COOK LN TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 103DD-00500 WILSON'S TIGARD RETAIL CENTER IN BY BOMCC ESCROW ADMINISTRATION TX1-2495 1717 MAIN ST 12TH FLOOR- DALLAS,TX 75201 2S 103DD-00400 WILSON'S TIGARD RETAIL CENTER IN BY BOMCC ESCROW ADMINISTRATION TX1-2495 1717 MAIN ST 12TH FLOOR- DALLAS,TX 75201 2S 103DD-00434 ZANDONATTI ALLEN F 10680 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY TIGARD,OR 97223 Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive#4 Tigard, OR 97224 Brooks Gaston 10272 SW Meadow Street Tigard, OR 97223 Don & Dorothy Erdt 13760 SW 121st Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Martha Bishop 10590 SW Cook Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Vanessa Foster 13085 SW Howard Drive Tigard, OR 97223 Susan Beilke 11755 SW 114th Place Tigard, OR 97223 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Patricia Keerins 12195 SW 121st Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - CENTRAL CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT Central.doc) UPDATED: November 27, 2002 T 1 I i 1 I \ CITY of TIGARD PARK K_ S • PARK ST ��/// GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM J AREA NOTIFIED 2$ 3MMNaa xlsauN,e: (500') 111 W x1NNNxe 1111111WMVCIPIIIMM mama, xtaueueN xleeueuee Q ' leMiMNNe FOR: Jennifer COOK LN �� _Fgx.,- .24Y.-q,g63 x"7t0e tom` RE: 2S 102CC; nlnculeet 600, 7011702 lleaaaaee7 f/�:: HI JZ Y nusateexa I-- Property owner information `. is valid for 3 months from xaxwaoua J n ''N. , the date printed on this map. IR mom., xloaNeNe1 xnNONxO >��; +.�,� ty, `► �+�+��:. 0 ST rrr` nuncio= xWxCNsee01 ell �// xMwsean TE xraeNNxe /V 1,111 xlaeeONNe xreuea33 441. Gj�� N xlmcexu • xlexuTna xwsccnxe 0 100 200 300 Feet xllaaeeB/N 1"=225 feet A 2$11.1111111811 .. j 0 \, City of Tigard . HILL V Informationshould be verified with the Development Services Division. 1 \ _ 13125,SW 9 Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 (503)639-4171 http://www.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date:Apr 16,2003;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR 2S 102CC-00500 2S 102CC-01200 13500 PACIFIC CORP INTERNATIONAL CHURCH OF THE FOUR BY CAPOZZOLI ADVISORY FOR 1910 W SUNSET BLVD#200 PENSIONS INC LOS ANGELES,CA 90026 21500 HAGGERTY ROAD SUITE►CO NORTHVILLE, MI 48167 2S 102CB-01802 2S 102CC-00702 BAR-AM LLC KOCH KELLY& BY GODFATHER'S PIZZA DAVIDSON JENNIFER 1905 NW 169TH PL#201 13565 SW PACIFIC HWY BEAVERTON,OR 97006 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 103DA-05900 2S 102CC-00600 BISHOP WILBUR A AND MARTHA E KOCH KELLY& PO BOX 23832 DAVIDSON JENNIFER TIGARD,OR 97281 13565 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 103DA-06200 2S 102CC-01000 BLAIR BARRY V&LINDA F KUBIN CARON 13490 SW WATKINS AVE 520 SW 6TH AVE#400 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97204 2S 103D D-00200 2S 103D D-00437 CEARLEY DARRELL A& LOUCKS HARLOW C&COLLEEN ANGELA M 13605 SW WATKINS AVE 13530 SW WATKINS AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 103D D-00433 2S 103DA-04701 CHAMBERLAIN JOHN A AND MOAR PATRICIA C TRUSTEE DEBRA A 4114 SW FLOWER ST 10710 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY PORTLAND,OR 97221 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 102CC-00701 2S 103DA-04702 DDHK VENTURES LLC MOAR PATRICIA C TRUSTEE 12604 SW 60TH CT 4114 SW FLOWER ST PORTLAND,OR 97219 PORTLAND,OR 97221 2S 103DD-00700 2S 103DA-04900 GILBERTSON LLOYD MURFINSIMMONS MATTHEW T& DARLENE J MICAHLE 15980 SW COLONY PLACE 13365 SW WATKINS TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 103DA-06000 2S 103DA-05602 HOLCOMBE GERALD A& NGUYEN TUYET-MAI THI& BELINDA M TRAN VAN BINH 13485 SW WATKINS ST 13434 SW 107TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-00700 2S103DA-05600 HORTON DENNIS M&ELISABETH A O'DEA PATRICIA J 19220 VIEW DR 13472 SW 107TH AVE WEST LINN,OR 97068 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DD-00401 2S103DD-00402 OWENS JOHN W&DEBORAH A SPANIOL MICHAEL R&CAROLYN S 13525 SW WATKINS 10605 SW FAIRHAVEN ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 103DA-06100 2S 103DD-00435 PAPEN CINDY&DAN STEVENS WILLIAM A&SARAH E 13450 SW WATKINS ST 10650 SW FAIRHAVEN ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 103DA-05603 2S 103D D-00600 PHILLIPS RICHARD F TIGARD GRANGE NO. 148 10676 SW COOK LN BY PHILIP R.YOUNT TREASURER TIGARD,OR 97223 11222 COTTONWOOD LANE TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 102CB-01800 2S 102CC-01100 PUBLIC STORAGE TIGARD LODGE NO.207 INSTITUTIONAL FUND OF AF&AM DEPT PT-OR26410 ATTN JOHN HAVERY SECY PO BOX 25025 P 0 BOX 230184 GLENDALE,CA 91201 TIGARD,OR 97281 2S 103DA-04600 2S 103DA-04800 PUGSLEY CLAYTON A& URL JOY B FREEMAN-PUGSLEY CAMIE 13370 SW WATKINS 10570 SW PARK ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 103DA-05800 2S 103DA-04700 RESLER MICHAEL D&BARBARA S URL JOY B 10620 SW COOK LN 13370 SW WATKINS TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 103DA-05000 2S 103D D-00100 ROSSBERG STEPHEN A VITIRITTI PIETRO&PASQUALINA 10605 SW COOK LN TRUSTEES TIGARD,OR 97223 14115 SW 157TH TIGARD,OR 97224 2S 103D D-00300 2S 103D D-00436 RUTAN DAVID G AND LORI WARD MARION M 13570 SW WATKINS AVE 10600 SW FAIRHAVEN TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 103DD-00403 2S 102CB-01804 SCHMIERER MICHAEL J AND WEBER COASTAL BELLS LIMITED BARBARA L WEBER EDUARD 10645 SW FAIRHAVEN ST 840 CONGER ST TIGARD,OR 97223 EUGENE,OR 97402 2S 103DA-05700 2S 103DA-05100 SHOLES LANCE M& WILLIAMS DAVID S ALFANO KRISTEN A 10635 SW COOK LN 10634 SW COOK LN TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 103DD-00500 WILSON'S TIGARD RETAIL CENTER IN BY BOMCC ESCROW ADMINISTRATION TX1-2495 1717 MAIN ST 12TH FLOOR- DALLAS,TX 75201 2S 103DD-00400 WILSON'S TIGARD RETAIL CENTER IN BY BOMCC ESCROW ADMINISTRATION TX1-2495 1717 MAIN ST 12TH FLOOR- DALLAS,TX 75201 2S 103D D-00434 ZANDONATTI ALLEN F 10680 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY TIGARD,OR 97223 Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive#4 Tigard, OR 97224 Brooks Gaston 10272 SW Meadow Street Tigard, OR 97223 Don & Dorothy Erdt 13760 SW 121st Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Martha Bishop 10590 SW Cook Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Vanessa Foster 13085 SW Howard Drive Tigard, OR 97223 Susan Beilke 11755 SW 114th Place Tigard, OR 97223 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Patricia Keerins 12195 SW 121st Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD - CENTRAL CIT SUBCOMMITTEE (i:\curpin\setup\labels\CIT Central.doc) UPDATED: November 27, 2002 11/I, �! G��:Cfi7Ci�L4'C .1� fes,, , CITY OF TIGARD , COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT fi, � PLANNING DIVISION ' ` CITY OF TIGARD ? f/ p Community'Development 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD C "� Shaping A Better Community TIGARD, OREGON 97223 PHONE: 503-639-4171 FAX: 503-684-1291(Attn: Patty or Shirley/Planning) UE'STFOR �00 eD� ' OP IRT c QWNEII MAILING 1 ' Property owner information is valid for 3 months from the date of your request INDICATE ALL PROJECT MAP & TAX LOT NUMBERS (i.e. IS134AB, Tax Lot 00100) OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW and INCLUDE A MAP OF ALL LOTS FOR THE PROJECT (preferably assessor's tax map): INDICATE WHETHER YOU ARE REQUESTING 2 0 3 ETS OF LABELS: (NOTE: A minimum of 2 sets of labels will be provided to place on r 2 sets of envelopes that applicants are required to submit at the time of application submittal. If a neighborhood meeting is required and you have not yet held that meeting, you should request 3 sets) ./J, ssIl NAME OF CONTACT PERSON: (ti4 (5--R c — PHONE: SC) 3 /X Y� �zThis request may be mailed, faxed, or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a 2-day minimum for processing requests. Upon completion of your request, the contact person will be called to pick up their request in "Will Call" by their last name, at the Community Development Reception Desk. The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up, as exact cost can not be pre-determined. PLEASE NOTE: FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PROVIDED BY THE CITY VS. RE-TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED. Cost Description: $11 to generate the mailing list, plus $2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels (20 addresses per sheet). Then, multiply the cost to print one set of labels by the number of sets requested. *EXAMPLE* * * COST FOR THIS REQUEST * 4 sheets of labels x$2/sheet = $8.00 x 2 sets = $16.00 sheet(s) of labels x$2/sheet = $ x S sets = sheets of labels x$2/sheet for CIT area x 2 sets = $ 4.00 _L sheet(s) of labels x$2/sheet for CIT area = $ x 02- sets = $ 2/ GENERATE LIST = $11.00GENERATE LIST = $11.01, TOTAL = $31.00 TOTAL = APPLICANT MATERIALS CONSULTING P 503.222.4453 V L M K ENGINEERS F 503.248.9263 E vlmk@vlmk.com 3933 SW Kelly Avenue • Portland • Oregon 97201-4393 W www.vlmk.com City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Site Development Review Submittal March 4, 2003 • Site Development Fee • Land Use Application (Original) • Narrative • Deed • Neighborhood Meeting Package (Including Envelopes) • Pre-Application Notes • Preliminary Stormwater Report • Traffic Study • CWS Submittal • Sensitive Land Report • (3) Sets of Plans IStructural Engineering • Civil Engineering • Industrial Engineering • Planning • Studies / Evaluations • Entitlement IA le PRE-APP.HELD BY: CITY 'OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OR 97223-8189 pm,roy;pr9 l 503.639.4171/503.684.7297 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION File# DR?,O03 .-o c,00 5 Other Case# Fp,E � _ 0 ,c,ci Date 3/Lf/oBy Receipt# v 03 & -I I Date Application Complete TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR ❑Adjustment/Variance (I or II) ❑ Minor Land Partition (II) ❑ Subdivision (II or III) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment(IV) ❑ Minor Modification (I) ❑Zone Change (III) ❑ Conditional Use (III) ❑ Planned Development (III) ❑Zone Change Annexation (IV) ❑ Historic Overlay (II or III) ❑Sensitive Lands Review (I, II or III) El Zone Ordinance Amendment (IV) ❑ Home Occupation (I or II) (Site Development Review(II) ❑ Miscellaneous (I)- (Lot Line Adjustment/Temporary Use/Tree Removal/Director's Interpretation, etc.) LOCATION WHERE PROPOSED AG I IVI I Y WILL OCCUR(Address if available) 3 5 L U TAX MAP 8,TAX LOT NOS. SQ2 GG / v<J CO i C) -70 2. / cU0 -70 .1- 10 I AL Si I t SIZE i ZONING CLASSIFICA I ION APPLICANT* V ter . cC/V)sL4 41 is z� -�-d �ti, � i�� 2PHONMAILING ADDRESS/CI FY/STATE/ZIP 27';')7 L'O ► c-12- PHONE E NO. FAX NO. PRIMA -PHONE NO. . 2.7/71=4 e-A VIA(A-1 -) t5e /2,2 PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER(Attach list if more than one) MAILING ADDRESS/CI FY/STATE/ZIP PHONE NO. FAX NO. *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. PROPOSAL SUMMARY(Please be specific) j7� i.v ,L.1 Lei t I f, -f e-Ac '1 X . 4 7—OCL) i k-K1 APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT ALL OF THE REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS AS DESCRIBED IN THE "BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS" INFORMATION SHEET. . r THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT: ♦ If the application is granted, the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s). SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. Owner's Signature Date Qwner's Siature" Date f Owner's Signature Date 0 3 Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date 9 CITY OF TIGARD LAND USE APPLICATIONS BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS This checklist identifies the basic submittal requirements for a land use application. BASIC INFORMATION: ❑ Completed Master"Land Use Permit"Application with property owner's signature or name of agent and letter of authorization ❑ Title transfer instrument or grant deed ❑ Written summary of proposal ❑ Narrative demonstrating compliance with all applicable development standards and approval criteria (as specified in the Pre-Application Conference notes) ❑ Two (2) sets of stamped, addressed #10 envelopes for all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. Mailing envelopes shall be standard legal-size (#10), addressed with 1" x 4" labels (see envelope submittal requirements). Property owner mailing lists must be prepared by the City for a minimal fee (see request for 500' property owner mailing list form). ❑ Documentary evidence of Neighborhood Meeting for the following: Site Development Review, Subdivision, Conditional Use, Sensitive Lands Review, Zone Change, Comprehensive Plan Amendments. ❑ Neighborhood Meeting Affidavits of Posting & Mailing Notice, Minutes, Sign-in Sheets ❑ Service Provider Letter ❑ Impact Study per Section 18.390.040.B.2.(e) ❑ Copy of the Pre-Application Conference notes ❑ Filing Fee (see fee schedule) PLANS REQUIRED: • In addition to the above basic information, each type of land use application will require one or more of the following maps or plans. PLEASE SUBMIT EACH OF THE PLANS CHECKED BELOW WITH YOUR APPLICATION-(See separate attachment for details on what information to include on each plan): ft . Vicinity Map 4siPreliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan Existing Conditions Map Preliminary Utilities Plan ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map itEL Preliminary Storm Drainage Plan ❑ Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Plan 44, Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan SID=- Site Development Plan 0 Architectural Drawings (elevations &floor plans) Landscape Plan 0 Sign Drawings Public Improvements/Streets Plan NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: The City requires multiple copies of submittal materials. The number of copies required depends on the type of review process. FOR PURPOSES OF REVIEWING YOUR APPLICATION FOR COMPLETENESS, ONLY 3 COPIES ARE NEEDED. THE BALANCE OF THE COPIES WILL BE REQUESTED FROM YOU, ONCE DEEMED COMPLETE, TO MAKE YOUR APPLICATION SUBMITTAL COMPLETE. h:\patty\masters\application submittal requirements.doc UPDATED: 26-Jun-02 CONSULTING P 503.222.4453 ENGINEERS F 503.248.9263 E vlmk@vlmk.com 3933 SW Kelly Avenue • Portland • Oregon 97201-4393 W www.vlmk.com February 11, 2003 City of Tigard, Oregon Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223-8189 RE: Quicklube Tigard - Site Design Review Submittal Existing: This project consists of one existing building that is presently an Antique and Cabinet Refinishing Store. This building will be demolished to make way for the new proposed Auto Lube facility (see below). The remainder of the site consists of a parking lot and vacant field. Proposed: The applicant is proposing to construct a new 4,200 sf. Auto Lube facility in the location of the existing Antique Store. Along with the new building will be a parking lot to serve the new facility. This Site Design Review Submittal includes a set of plans on 30" x 42" that indicate the proposed design for the new facility. It also includes an 8 1/2" x 11" package of information required by the City. Please refer to the Table of Contents in this package that list the items included in the submittal. Zoning: This project is zoned CG (General Commercial). Pre-Application Compliance: The following is a list of items from the Pre-Application Conference Report dated 12/05/02: Heading Requirement Compliance Zoning • Various percentages • Comply with all percentages Dimensional and setbacks. and setbacks. Requirements Neighborhood Notify neighbors and conduct Owner has completed this meeting meeting. requirement - see attached copies of meeting minutes. ' Narrative Submit with application. This document is the Narrative. Impact Study Submit copy to city. Included in this submittal. Access Pavement widths, queuing See Site Plan for compliance areas, etc. ' Structural Engineering • Civil Engineering • Industrial Engineering • Planning • Studies / Evaluations • Entitlement Walkway From entry to public street See Site Plan for compliance Requirements Buffering and 15.0' abutting residential See Landscape Plan for compliance screening Landscaping Street trees are required Two have been shown that work with ODOT criteria (see sheet L-1). Parking (5) Spaces required (6) Are indicated on the Site Plan Bicycle parking (2) Required (2) Are indicated on Site Plan CWS Letter application required See attached letter Signs Permit required To be handled by Owner Tree Removal Must mitigate existing trees to See L-1 for new trees. requirements be removed Mitigation See tree removal above See tree removal above. Clear vision area 3 to 8 feet of clear area See L-1 for compliance Additional Concerns or Comments: Joint access with See Site Plan and Traffic Impact adjoining Report for compliance property Need cross-over See Site Plan and Traffic Impact easement Report for compliance 50 foot stacking See Site Plan for compliance Engineering Section: R-O-W Check with ODOT to see if it is ODOT indicates that it is NOT Dedication required required. Street Curb, sidewalk, planter strip See Site Plan for compliance Improvements and street trees Sanitary Sewer Connect new building to city See Site Utility Plan for compliance Sanitary Water Service Connect to city water See Site Utility Plan for compliance Fire Service Contact Tualatin Valley for Will coordinate with TVFD during next requirements or questions phase - this is just preliminary utilities Storm Sewer Verify detention requirements See Site Utility Plan for compliance and submit storm design Water Quality Verify requirement and/or fee See Site Utility Plan for compliance Other Comments Traffic Study? See attached copy TIF fees Verify with city Will coordinate with city Permits Review for types required Will coordinate with city l0 HE NORDINC REQUESTED BY Washington County,Oregon 2003_006237 t i FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY OF OREGON 0111412003 04:05:56 PM D-DW CMst Stns4 A DUYCK Vr\i GRANTOR'S NAME $10.00$6.00$11.00$225.00-Totals$252.00 Dennis M. Horton and Elisabeth A. Horton GRANTEE'S NAME 00242764200300062370020020 DDHK Ventures, LLC I,Jerry Hanson,Director of Assessment and Taxation and Ex-Officio County Clerk for Washington County, r-a "1 z Oregon,do hereby certify that the within Instrument of Jrt•�'"•a � v1tingwasr,celvsdandrecordedInth/bookor tic,,,, SEND TAX STATEMENTS T0: records of uld county. s.. !! � DDHK, LLC `'„ ” Jerry R.HmsonED Director County Cleric t and Taxation, 12604 SW 60th Court Portland, OR 97219 AFTER RECORDING RETURN T0: DDHK, LLC 12604 SW 60th Court Portland, OR 97219 • :•v - \ •- - •-. - 1 STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED Dennis M. Horton and Elisabeth A. Horton, Husband and Wife, Grantor, conveys and warrants to DDHK Ventures, LLC, a Oregon Limited Liability Company, Grantee, the following described real property, free and clear of encumbrances except as specifically set forth below, situated in the County of Washington, State of Oregon, 1 `J' SEE EXHIBIT ONE ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF � ;;r - WASHINGTON COUNTY ill I''(l},9, REAL PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX •I : '; ,:, "`,.''4 FEE PAID DATE 1 't Yc, tS Subject to and excepting: '4.=(•t-s, - '' ' 0 C- Those of record; covenants, conditions, restrictions and easements of record. THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF uD APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT THE ra PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY it,` PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. THE TRUE AND ACTUAL CONSIDERATION FOR THIS CONVEYANCE IS $225,000.00 (See ORS 93.030) DATED: January 9, 2003 &Q.ww%‘ lM l ,•/U Dennis M. Horton / elk4 ZI.., Elisabeth A. Horton STATE OF OREGON COUNTY OF Washington 4..„..4741. OFFICIASLSEAL ��,� ;, KF KIM H M I TE H This instrument was acknowledged before me on NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ®r,,,, COMMISSION NO. 336966 January 9, 2003 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT 19,2004 by Dennis -Horton ant •• isabeth A. Horton NOTA PUBLIC FOR OREGON MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: FORD-313 (Rev 2/96) STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED EseerowaiNo. 09-9000501-KHS-28 MINI 1 1111 1 111 Title Order Nc. 09000501 2003-6237 EXHIBIT ONE A tract of land located in the Southwest one-quarter of the Southwest one-quarter of Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, described as follows: Beginning at a 3/4 inch iron pipe on the line between Sections 2 and 3, being 1305.0 feet South of the quarter section corner common to said Sections 2 and 3; thence South 89°47' East 218.54 feet to the Northwest corner of Tract II as described in Contract recorded February 22, 1978, Recorder's Fee No. 78-8552;thence Southwesterly 86.16 feet, parallel with the Northwesterly right of way line of that tract conveyed by Wilbur Bishop, Jr. to Harry 0. and Geraldine M. Wahl and Leonard E. and Genevieve Wahl, by Deed dated September 13, 1978, recorded September 18, 1978, Recorder's Fee No. 78-41338, Washington County Deed Records; thence Northwesterly, along the said Northeasterly tract line, 66 feet to the most Northerly corner of said Wahl Tract; thence South 33°15' 17" West 234.0 feet, more or less, along the Northwesterly line of the said Wahl Tract, to a point which is also the most Northwesterly corner of the said Wahl Tract; thence North 3°00' East 235.5 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. Excepting therefrom that portion thereof described in Memorandum of Contract recorded March 30, 1994, as Recorder's Fee No. 94030603 and described as follows: A tract of land in the Southwest one-quarter of the Southwest one-quarter of Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of Lot 3,MELROSE SUBDIVISION;thence, leaving said subdivision, North 89°49'36" East, and along the South line of that tract of land as described in Recorder's Fee No. 85-50752, Washington County Deed Records, 139.47 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod and the true point of beginning of the herein described parcel; thence, continuing along said line, North 89°49'36" East 79.08 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod; thence, leaving said line, South 33°15'17" West, parallel to the Westerly right of way of the Pacific Highway, 86.36 feet to a point on the Northerly line of that tract of land as described in Recorder's Fee No. 7841228, Washington County Deed Records; thence North 56°44'43" West, along said Northerly line of said Recorder's Fee No. 7841366, 66.00 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod; thence, leaving said Northerly line, North 33°15'17" East, parallel to the Westerly right of way line of the Pacific Highway, 42.79 feet to the true point of beginning. Together with an easement for ingress, egress and driveway purposes as set forth in instrument recorded March 29, 1994, Fee No. 94030602. (L Washington :aunty,Oregon 2003.006238 RECORDING REQUESTED BY D.DB$2003 04:05:56 PM •DBS Cntat Stna4 A DUYCK ('( Fidelity National Title Company of Oregon $10.00$6.00$11.00-Total a$27.00 GRANTOR'S NAME 00242770200300062380020020 I,Jerry Hanson,Director of A ment and Taxation •+•. GRANTEE'S NAME and Ex-Officio County Clerk for Washington County, LLy.,,,, DDH K LLC Oregon,do hereby certify that the within Instrument of ' writingwas received and recorded In the book of •I" '4?:;,-`,,,,;"jolt ' records of said county. '' t. SEND TAX STATEMENTS To: Jerry R.Hanson,Director essment and Taxation, �x,'`•;,,i Count Ex-Officio County Clerk DDHK, LLC 12604 SW 60th Court Portland, OR 97219 AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: same as above :ey 1 a- • a•a • STATUTORY BARGAIN and SALE DEED ' Kelly Koch and Jennifer R. Davidson, as tenants in common, Grantor, conveys to r- `a DDHK, LLC, an Oregon Limited Liability Company, Grantee, the following described real property, situated in the J County of Washington, State of Oregon, ` .) SEE EXHIBIT ONE ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF l I1 ;) THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. THE TRUE AND ACTUAL CONSIDERATION FOR THIS CONVEYAN I $0.0° ee ORS 93.030) f f r r ,. Al K; IyKoc , /i-ThJ � - -nnifer R. Pavidson DATED: January 10, 2003 • fn. OFFICIAL SEAL ' ° KIM H SMITH '"',, NOTARY PUBLIC—OREGON K COMMISSION NO. 336966 STATE OF OREGON MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT 19,2004 COUNTY OF Washington This instrument was acknowledged before me on January/, 2003 by Kelly Ko h and ennifer R. Davidson NOTAd PUBLI FOR OREGON MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: FORD-309 (Rev 2/96) STATUTORY BARGAIN AND SALE DEED Escrow No. 09-9000645-KHS-28 •Title'Order No. 09000645 2003-6238 EXHIBIT ONE PARCEL I: A tract in the Southwest one-quarter of Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, described as follows: Beginning at the one-quarter corner between Sections 2 and 3, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian; thence South 1305.0 feet to a 3/4" iron pipe; thence North 89°48' East 218.54 feet to a 1/4 inch iron pipe at the true point of beginning of the tract herein described; thence continuing North 89°48' East 64.81 feet to a Ford Axle in the Northwesterly right of way line of the relocated West Side Pacific Highway; thence Southwesterly 122.0 feet, along said right of way line, to a 1/4 inch pipe; thence Westerly, at right angles, 54.0 feet to a 1/4 inch iron pipe; thence Northeasterly 86.16 feet, parallel with said right of way, to the true point of beginning. PARCEL II: A tract of land in the Southwest one-quarter of the Southwest one-quarter of Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of Lot 3, MELROSE SUBDIVISION, in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon; thence, leaving said subdivision, North 89°49'36" East, and along the South line of that tract of land as described in Fee No. 85050752, Washington County Deed Records, 139.47 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod and the true point of beginning of the herein described parcel; thence, continuing along said line, North 89°49'36" East 79.08 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod; thence, leaving said line, South 33°15'17" West, parallel to the Westerly right of way line of the Pacific Highway, 86.36 feet to a point on the Northerly line of that tract of land as described in Fee No. 7841338, Washington County Deed Records;thence North 56°44'43" West, along said Northerly line of said Fee No. 7841338, 66.00 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod; thence, leaving said Northerly line, North 33°15'17" East, parallel to the Westerly right of way line of the Pacific Highway, 42.79 feet to the point of beginning. Tigard Quick Lube Neighborhood Meeting Notes February 3,2003 Meeting started at 6:00 PM at the Tigard Water Building Auditorium. 11 people were in attendance (see attached Sign In Sheet). Michael Denton (Owner/operator) read "Statement of Purpose" letter. Tim Horst (Owner/operator) explained the business and building being proposed. Showed and explained the proposed site plan and building plan. Michael Denton discussed the proposed fencing and landscape buffer adjacent to the residential properties. Opened for questions and comments (See attached Questions and Comments). Most questions were regarding the fence and landscaping against the residential properties, and the lighting at night. Everyone felt the project as stated would be an improvement to the area. Meeting ended at 6:40 Neighborhood Meeting Tigard Quick Lube Sign In Sheet February 03 2003 Name Address Phone # Mi/koir 1. //77t/.1,44A/*c° /U' Ji -777>- 2. 7;52. 6•1a �,.� /'�ik ` Iglu /P ,06--,5'6„) r;,1��'� pC 3. jAALJ? 13 536 „5. i). i ,_3333 ttt 4. . Ccu ,t 5. 1k - =�, #4 t eide SV-Pa _17 50-5� V13 61A .., i� t ,f 0 _, l 3.L ,54-)4� -54§ -CA ik--7D2 Y . QlJtuA4t- /3 5 l lcd )-1c,/�c_ t- 503 - 62r,--7l 6 o 8. (35-20 603Li Au 6i41-1-60 9. (L 3M s c 3 s4 (fGe( c 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Neighborhood Meeting Tigard Quick Lube February 03, 2003 Questions and Comments Name Address Phone # (I // 24LLj / 1 '3L 2 5,u) Zl'i}2 - z.,tJ 2_0 53 Question and Comment ) fj A—7_eci 71 4 ? Answer and Comment /. ftfizt_64,, ,u, e4 44A4fid5. , z:LL12114,314A_I / co-e-ez 0.7 7 a,74--leth-Auf1,-r: 3. i;Lizz) byejtele- dosevit hz_ciizro frci44 Neighborhood Meeting Tigard Quick Lube February 03, 2003 Questions and Comments Name Address Phone # A21,/bo//-pvese-057 7-7,e,‘Z,C ?772 -7/7 Ouestion and Comment 7 0617 2 / rar,z Answer and Comment 2 6 .2142114 •6.0 Z2e ,07-eAt •2 :14/') ./1 January 17, 2003 RE: Auto Service Center Dear Interested party: DDHK Ventures, LLC, is the owner of the property located at 13565 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard, OR. We are considering proposing an auto service center at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, we would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: February 3, 2003 At 6:00 PM In the Tigard Water Building Auditorium 8777 SW Burnham St. Tigard OR. 97223 Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. We look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Sincerely, Michael Denton AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING/POSTING NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE IMPORTANT NOTICE: THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO MAIL THE CITY OF TIGARD A"COPY` F THE NEIGHBORHOOD'MEETING NOTICE THAT PERTAINS TO THIS AFFIDAVIT AT'THEIAME TIMEPROPERTY OWNERS ARE MAILED NOTICE, TO THE ADDRESS BELOW: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223-8189 IN ADDITION, THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT THIS AFFIDAVIT & COPIES OF ALL NOTICES AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION.' MAILING: ht/.1GL DE ArroAS , being duly sworn, depose and say that on the 47 day of 20 03 , I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a propos d development at(or near) /3 S 4, 5 C. W Pa C i p'L /4"/LC-4, a/1-R ) Oi • ,.a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof.a I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at 77 ,/Q with postage prepaid thereon. /71, ignature (In the presence of a Notary Public) POSTING: , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed 5.,P2Ut C2. CQiu -& affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s IF no address(s)and/or tax lot(s)current�) t registered) / 3 57 5 S.Grp 1919C t FT C,AR D OK and did on the / day of 3 c[�u� , 20 03 personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a ,¢, S.ecutce o,t e application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. ,p • The sign was posted at /. ..51c, S S'.. L c] a C��* � /61 l 2 C' D (state location you posted notice on property) .- Zs Signature (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF (reJ o" County of Was.,h1r j tc/i ) ss. 11) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 4 day of Ft- 1,1 '-Le)r J , 20 O3 . .41 OFFICIAL SEAL GREER A GASTON NOTARY `- - :MMISSION NO.327900 G �/ MY COMA SSION EXPIRES OCT.10.2003 NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON My Commission Expires: /0-/0- 03 Applicant,please complete the information below: NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Address or General Location of Subject Property: /354, 5 S. W • Pete/f/L ffwl Ta-G f/2b O-R Subject Property Tax Map(s)and Lot#(s): #.2 S/O CG 00600 - 1c)/ -F- 7 OZ h:Uogin\patty\masters\affidavit of marling-posting neighborhood meeting.doc 2S1030A-05600 2S103DD-00402 O'DEA THOMAS M&PATRICIA J SPANIOL MICHAEL R&CAROLYN S 13472 SW 107TH 10605 SW FAIRHAVEN ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DD-00401 2S103DD-00435 OWENS JOHN W&DEBORAH A STEVENS WILLIAM A&SARAH E 13525 SW WATKINS 10650 SW FAIRHAVEN ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DA-06100 2S103DD-00600 PAPEN CINDY&DAN TIGARD GRANGE NO. 148 13450 SW WATKINS ST BY PHILIP R.YOUNT TREASURER TIGARD,OR 97223 11222 COTTONWOOD LANE TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CB-01800 2S102CC-01100 PUBLIC STORAGE TIGARD LODGE NO.207 INSTITUTIONAL FUND OF AF&AM DEPT PT-OR26410 ATTN JOHN HAVERY SECY PO BOX 25025 P 0 BOX 230184 GLENDALE,CA 91201 TIGARD,OR 97281 2S103DA-04600 2S103DA-04800 PUGSLEY CLAYTON A& URL JOY B FREEMAN-PUGSLEY CAMIE 13370 SW WATKINS 10570 SW PARK ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DA-05800 2S103DA-04700 RESLER MICHAEL D&BARBARA S U OY 10620 SW COOK LN 1337 WATKINS TIGARD,OR 97223 T ARD,OR 97223 2S1030A-05000 2S103DD-0O100 ROSSBERG STEPHEN A VITIRITTI PIETRO&PASQUALINA 10605 SW COOK LN TRUSTEES TIGARD,OR 97223 14115 SW 157TH TIGARD,OR 97224 2S10300-00300 2S10300-00436 RUTAN DAVID G AND LORI WARD MARION M 13570 SW WATKINS AVE 10600 SW FAIRHAVEN TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S10300-00403 2S102CB-01804 SCHMIERER MICHAEL J AND WEBER COASTAL BELLS LIMITED BARBARA L WEBER EDUARD 10645 SW FAIRHAVEN ST 840 CONGER ST TIGARD,OR 97223 EUGENE,OR 97402 2S103DA-05700 2S103DA-05100 SHOLES LANCE M& WILLIAMS DAVID S ALFANO KRISTEN A 10635 SW COOK LN 10634 SW COOK LN TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-00500 2S102CC-01200 13500 PACIFIC CORP INTERNATIONAL CHURCH OF THE FOUR BY CAPOZZOLI ADVISORY FOR 1910 W SUNSET BLVD#200 PENSIONS INC LOS ANGELES,CA 90026 21500 HAGGERTY ROAD SUITE 100 NORTHVILLE,MI 48167 2S102CB-01802 2S103DA-05603 BAR-AM LLC KIRWAN KENNETH B&BARBARA J BY GODFATHER'S PIZZA 10676 SW COOK LN 1905 NW 169TH PL#201 TIGARD,OR 97223 BEAVERTON,OR 97006 2S1031)A-05900 2S102CC-00702 BISHOP WILBUR A AND MARTHA E KOCH KELLY& PO BOX 23832 DAVIDSON JENNIFER TIGARD,OR 97281 13565 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DA-06200 2S102CC-00600 BLAIR BARRY V&LINDA F KOCH KELL & 13490 SW WATKINS AVE DA JENNIFER TIGARD,OR 97223 1356 CIFIC HWY T ARD,OR 9 23 2S10300-00200 2S102CC-21000 CEARLEY DARRELL A& KUBIN CARON ANGELA M 520 SW 6TH AVE#400 13530 SW WATKINS AVE PORTLAND,OR 97204 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DD-00433 2S1030D-00437 CHAMBERLAIN JOHN A AND LOUCKS HARLOW C&COLLEEN DEBRA A 13605 SW WATKINS AVE 10710 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DD-00700 2S1030A-04701 GILBERTSON LLOYD MOAR PATRICIA C TRUSTEE DARLENE J 4114 SW FLOWER ST 15980 SW COLONY PLACE PORTLAND,OR 97221 TIGARD,OR 97223 231030A-06000 2S1030A-04702 HOLCOMBE GERALD A& R PA CIA C TRUSTEE BELINDA M 4114 LOWER ST 13485 SW WATKINS ST P TLAND, 97221 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-00700 2S103DA-04900 HORTON DENNIS M&ELISABETH A MURFINSIMMONS MATTHEW T& 19220 VIEW DR MICAHLE WEST LINN,OR 97068 13365 SW WATKINS TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CC-00701 2S103DA-05602 TON NIS M&ELISABETH A NGUYEN TUYET-MAI THI& 19220 DR TRAN VAN BINH W T LINN,0 97068 13434 SW 107TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103DD-00400 WILSON'S TIGARD RETAIL CENTER IN BY BOMCC ESCROW ADMINISTRATION TX1-2495 1717 MAIN ST 12TH FLOOR-ESCROW DALLAS,TX 75201 2S103DD-00500 WILSON'S TIGARP RETAIL CENTER IN BY =I MCC E ROW ADMINISTRATION TX1-24' 1717 IN S TH FLOOR-ESCROW • I LAS,TX 75 +1 2S103DD-00434 ZANDONATTI ALLEN F 10680 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY TIGARD,OR 97223 Jack Biethan 11023 SW Summerfield Drive#4 Tigard, OR 97224 Brooks Gaston 10272 SW Meadow Street Tigard, OR 97223 Don & Dorothy Erdt 13760 SW 121st Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Martha Bishop 10590 SW Cook Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Vanessa Foster 13085 SW Howard Drive Tigard, OR 97223 Susan Beilke 11755 SW 114th Place Tigard, OR 97223 Nathan and Ann Murdock PO Box 231265 Tigard, OR 97281 Patricia Keerins 12195 SW 121st Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 'CITYOF TIG RD 4 E- ,PPLICAT I0N CONFERE N E,3NOTES (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid :forSix '6 Months) NON-RESIDENTIAL FPIVIG o . 7� fFAST : /f 5/ 'i APPLICANT: L2 D//K 1,,/--1c c.c4 e 5 �C AGENT: Phone: (6E-3) - Phone: (3T)=5) _ o y 776. PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: %� 5"�5 r_ TAX MAP(S)/LOT #(S): S/plc C- %C.' '2 ) I rye- NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: (---5D PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: X- 1.7 -z xr s COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: .� ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: -69 CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM(C.I.T.)AREA: ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18. C l MINIMUM LOT SIZE: '7-) sq. ft. Average Min. lot width:-3 ft. Max. building height: /S"ft. Setbacks: Front - ft. Side ft. Rear --ems- it. Corner ft. from street. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: 55.__A7-% Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: -z c %. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, THE MEMBERS OF ANY LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE(S), AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. * NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section m NARRATIVE [Refer to Code Chapter 18.390) The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. (g IMPACT STUDY [Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.0501 As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. R. ACCESS [Refer to Chapters 18.105 and 18.7651 Minimum number of accesses: / Minimum access width: 3 . Minimum pavement width: ' All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: —= - • j. WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS [Refer to Code Section 18.705.030) WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. ❑ SPECIAL SETBACKS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7301 ➢ STREETS: feet from the centerline of ➢ LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet, along the site's boundary. ➢ FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK. ❑ SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS [Refer to Code Section 18.730.010.11.1 BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: ➢ A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; ➢ All actual building setbacks will be at least half(1,4) of the building's height; and ➢ The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. t- BUFFERING AND SCREENING [Refer to Code Chapter 18.7451 In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section • The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to your proposal area are: feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. feet along south boundary. feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION, SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: LANDSCAPING [Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.7051 STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of- way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. ❑ RECYCLING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.7551 Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Lenny Hing is the contact person and can be reached at (503) 625-6177. PARKING (Refer to Code Section 18.765.040) REQUIRED parking for this type of use: r"ham l< �F = s' /,'7-1 Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: ➢ Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet, 6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches. ➢ Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet, 6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three(3)feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. HANDICAPPED PARKING: ➢ All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. ➢ BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. ❑ LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.765.0801 Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section • 01 BICYCLE RACKS [Refer to Code Section 18.765) BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. LI SENSITIVE LANDS [Refer to Code Chapter 18.715) The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS, WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT, OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre- application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. I I STEEP SLOPES [Refer to Code Section 18.715.080.C) When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. 8,CLEANWATER SERVICES[CWS)BUFFER STANDARDS [Refer to R a 0 96-44/USA Regulations-Chapter 3) LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION & ORDER 96-44 z �� a4 SE��lT1�/FAREA DEFINIT#Ol�` �. � .n. �� - ,� �� IVIDTH OF VEGf TATED • Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25% �) 10 to <50 acres 15 feet + >50 to <100 acres 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre <25% 50 feet • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres • Natural lakes and ponds • Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25% + 10 to <50 acres 30 feet + >50 to <100 acres 50 feet • Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure • Rivers, streams, and springs with year-round flow in 25-foot increments from the starting • Streams with intermittent flow draining >100 acres point to the top of ravine (break in • Natural lakes and ponds <25%slope), add 35 feet past the top of ravine6 4Starting point for measurement = edge of the defined channel (bankful flow) for streams/rivers, delineated wetland boundary, delineated spring boundary,and/or average high water for lakes or ponds, whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs, located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor,shall not serve as a starting point for measurement. 5Vegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. 6The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet,if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as provided for in the CWS Design and Construction Standards. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIOENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. CWS Service Provider Letter: PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the R&O 96-44 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. SIGNS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.780) SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. fa TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.CJ A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING, REMOVAL AND PROTECTION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. THE TREE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE the following: ➢ Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the City; ➢ Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060.D according to the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: �) Retainage of less than 25% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two- thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of from 50 to 75% of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50% of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.790.060.D.; Retainage of 75% or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; ➢ Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and ➢ A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. EN MITIGATION (Refer to Code Section 18.790.060.1] REPLACEMENT OF A TREE shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damaged is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section ➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. IN LIEU OF TREE REPLACEMENT under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. k CLEAR VISION AREA (Refer to Code Chapter 18.795) The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. (l ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.0601 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2% TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 1% times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. CODE CHAPTERS - 18.330(Conditional Use) 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) 54 18.765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) _ 18.340(Directors Interpretation) 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) _ 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) - 18.350(Planned Development) K 18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation) 5<.. 18.780(signs) 18.360(Site Development Review) 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) _ 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) - 18.370(Variances/Adjustments) 18.715(Density Computations) '� 1• 8.790(Tree Removal) - 18.380(Zoning Map[rext Amendments) 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) - 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) < 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) 1• 8.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) - 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) 18.740(Historic Overlay) - 18.420(Land Partitions) 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) _ 18.430(Subdivisions) 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) - 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) ')C 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recyding Storage) - 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: '. �_..rsl L c /7- -* — / Gv � -�C}—I -_ PROCEDURE )C Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. The Planning counter closes at 4:00 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One (1), 81/21 x 11" map of a proposed protect should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal peri follows all land a decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard ��. � ,� �� . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available-from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planningthat should apply to the development of ,your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide inforation rquired bythe Code shall not constitute a waver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended thaa prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staffprelative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: CITY OF TIGAR PIANNI IVISION - 'SfiAFF PERSON HOLDING PRE-APP. MEETING PHONE: (503) 639-4111 FAX: (503) 684-1291 E-MAIL (staff's first name)@ci.tigard.or.us TITLE 18(CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE)INTERNET ADDRESS: www.ci.tigard.or.us H:\patty\masters\Pre-App Notes Commercial.doc Updated: 3-Oct-02 (Engineering section:preapp.eng) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES 11 ➢ ENGINEERING SECTION Q a'� °nn ii nt SFu ping A Better Community PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Mains): 2S102CC Tax Lelia 600,702 Use Type: Oil Change Business The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ® SW Pacific Highway to ?? feet (Applicant should check with ODOT to determine if ROW dedication is needed. SW to feet ❑ SW to feet SW to feet Street improvements: ® Partial street improvements will be necessary along SW Pacific Highway, to include: (� feet of pavement TV-concrete curb n storm sewers and other underground utilities NO -foot concrete sidewalk wl >V-'P [✓street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page l of 6 Engineering Department Section E Other: Check wi` DOT Region 1, Christian Snuffin, ; /731-8202. ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: ❑ street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: n feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. n Other: n street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: ❑ feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb I I storm sewers and other underground utilities -foot concrete sidewalk street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. Other: n street improvements will be necessary along SW , to include: feet of pavement ❑ concrete curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities (� -foot concrete sidewalk CITY OF TIGARD Pro-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 Weltering Department Section • ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: Agreement for Future Street Improvements: In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to provide a future improvement guarantee. The City Engineer will determine the form of this guarantee. The following street improvements may be eligible for such a future improvement guarantee: (1.) (2.) Overhead Utility Lines: ❑ Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines which run adjacent to this site along SW Prior to , the applicant shall either place these utilities underground, or pay the fee in- lieu described above. Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) 8 inch line which is located to the west of this site. The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to-ft . riwv.pU A PUS - L'O-S' " - 'r'k" l " Water Supply: The City of Tigard (Phone:(503) 639-4171) provides public water service in the area of this site. This service provider should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (South Division) [Contact: Eric McMullen, (503) 612-7010] provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. CITY 01 TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 Engineering Department Section Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. If there is no increase in impervious area, then no detention is required. 1F �,u0 �F. •T� ► ,-t�t�-;;�►.� k Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $210. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ❑ Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ® Payment of the fee in-lieu. This provision only applies if there is an increase in the impervious area on the site. ' (0-" ) --rocJ A FactL �S (Z L42Cp. Other Comments: 1 All proposed sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems shall be designed such that City maintenance vehicles will have unobstructed access to critical manholes in the systems. Maintenance access roadways may be required if existing or proposed facilities are not otherwise readily accessible. 1. The applicant must coordinate with ODOT with regard to the access provisions for this site. The pr sent configuration will likely be denied. The contact for ODOT will be Christian Snuffin (731-8202). a13‘,rt a irtAfryL TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 Engineering Department Section permit. Deferral of the pa. ant until occupancy is permissible ily when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. Pay TIF for change in use. PERMITS Public Facility Improvement (PFI) Permit: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a PFI permit from the Engineering Department. A PFI permit application is available at the Planning/Engineering counter in City Hall. For more extensive work such as street widening improvements, main utility line extensions or subdivision infrastructure, plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The Engineering Department fee structure for this permit is considered a cost recovery system. A deposit is collected with the application, and the City will track its costs throughout the life of the permit, and will either refund any remaining portion of the deposit, or invoice the Permittee in cases where City costs exceeds the deposit amount. The Permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security. Where professional engineered plans are required, the Permittee must execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement, which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. The PFI permit fee structure is as follows: NOTE: If an PFI Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 Engineering Department Section For a land partition, ' applicant must obtain an Engineer j Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. GRADING PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS All subdivision projects shall require a proposed grading plan prepared by the design engineer. The engineer will also be required to indicate which lots have natural slopes between 10% and 20%, as well as lots that have natural slopes in excess of 20%. This information will be necessary in determining if special grading inspections will be required when the lots develop. The design engineer will also be required to shade all structural fill areas on the construction plans. In addition, each homebuilder will be required to submit a specific site and floor plan for each lot. The site plan shall include topographical contours and indicate the elevations of the corners of the lot. The builder shall also indicate the proposed elevations at the four corners of the building. PREPARED BY: I Z I Z ENGIN ING DEPART ENT STAFF DTE Phone: (503)639-4111 Fax: (503)624-0752 is\eng\brianr\templates\preap notes-eng.dot Revised: March 21,2002 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 Engineering Department section PRE-APPLICATION 'MI'/�"''''r�"�' ''�� CONFERENCE REQUEST CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223(503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION H FOR'STAFF USE ONLY Applicant: b b �e NLt✓-e S) (_L L Address: 1 S9 S' NW Wt mQA D hone:S� -1°1SlL1cl6 Z Case No.: ivCi c,Z_, - 00O1 City: Pel A1(;v a. OK Zip:c1 7 22`l Receipt No.: 2— Lt 5-2. 7 Contact Person:1't v� 1--l1.--.;\ Phone:s%—-- ) -T)�, Application Accepted By: KQ.� Date: ( I (27/oZ Qf Property Owner/Deed Holder(s): KA lw Ck r DATE OF PRE-APP.: 1 S- (S /� TIME OF PRE-APP.: `( Address: 13 SCS S\/.1 PUii(,t- H\lphone: 3SC E� -- )U-Z'A PRE APP. HELD WITH: City: I l i 10:i kV Zip: 11�Z: Rev.7/1/2002 i:\curpin\masters\revised\Pre-AppRequest.doc Property .Address/Location(s): I>S C S SCJ f 4 c c*,L. 6 .),� 17,S S c CA ; i-L`% REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS (Note: applications will not be accepted without the required submittal elements) Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s)::)__S 102 L L Q C Q'J Zoning:s� - 1 C —LCL "'0 7C`` a Pre-Application Conf. Request Form Site Size: I 1)S' IS SVet.. '' 2 COPIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: a1 Brief Description of the Proposal and PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION any site-specific questions/issues that you would like to have staff research prior to the meeting. All of the information identified on this form are required to be submitted by the applicant and received by the Planning Division a E1 Site Plan. The site plan must show the minimum of one (1) week prior to officially scheduling a proposed lots and/or building layouts pre-application conference date/time to allow staff ample time to drawn to scale. Also, show the location prepare for the meeting. of the subject property in relation to the nearest streets; and the locations of A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 driveways on the subject property and weeks of the Planning Division's receipt of the request for either across the street. Tuesday or Thursday mornings. Pre-application conferences are 1111 The Proposed Uses. one (1) hour long and are typically held between the hours of 9:00-11:00 AM. IP Topographic Information. Include Contour Lines if Possible. PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDULED IN kin If the Pre-Application Conference is for a PERSON AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER FROM MONOPOLE project, the applicant must 8:00-4:00/MONDAY-FRIDAY. attach a copy of the letter and proof in the form of an affidavit of mailing, that IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND THE the collocation protocol was completed PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE (see Section 18.798.080 of the Tigard INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM Community Development Code). ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE GROUP. Filing Fee $200.00 Pre-Apps (CD Meetings) December 2002 s M T W T FS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 8:00 8:30 9:00 Pre-app 9:30 10:00 Pre-App 10:30 I1a0 fre-app Tim Horst 503-310-4776 13565 SW Pacific Hwy & 13555 SW Pacific Hwy 11:30 12:00 12:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 12:57PM Wednesday, November 27, 2002 Pre Application Narrative 13565 SW Pacific Hwy, Tigard We are proposing to remove the existing building that is currently used as an antique store and build a drive up 3 bay oil change facility. Our building has a customer lounge with full espresso bar inside for our customers while they wait for their oil to be changed. Our building design and materials are of a higher quality than most oil change facilities. 'Parcel : R0466542 Ref Parcel #: 2S102CC 00600MktTotal : $237, 940 Owner : Koch Kelly MktLand : $83, 850 CoOwner : Davidson Jennifer MktStruct: $154, 090 Site : 13555 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard 97223 MktOther : Mail : 13565 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard Or 97223 %SImprvd : 65 Xfered : 11/18/1997 Doc # : 108655 Multi-Parcelmpt Price : $20, 000 Deed : Quit Claim Type Pr Xfer : 05/28/1996 Pr Doc# : 47056 Levy Cd : 02374 PrPrice : $240, 000 SchDist : Tigard NbrhdCd : Zphy 01-02 Tax: $1, 511.36 ClassCode:S1 MillRte : 15. 6423 Use : 2012Com, Improved MapGrid : 655 D5 SubPlat R : 01W T : 02S S : 02 Q : SW QQ : SW Legal : ACRES . 14 Phone . Owner .• • Tenant . Census : Tract : 319.04 Block : 2 Measure 50 Assd Total : $96, 620 Bedrooms Lot Acres : . 14 Year Built . Bathrooms Lot SqFt : 6, 098 EffYearBlt Heat Method : BsmFin SF Floor Cover : Pool BsmUnfinSF Foundation . Appliances Bldg SqFt Roof Shape . Dishwasher lstFlrSF Roof Matl Hood Fan UpperFlSF InteriorMat : Deck : Porch SqFt Paving Matl : Garage Type : Attic SqFt Ext Finish . Garage SF Deck SqFt Const Type . Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. $W I/' WI/4 SECTION 2 T2S V W.M. 2S I 2CC • WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON e, •NW e°•A. to // / SCALE I"=100' y 12 v4 /4, // / 305 •E 12 z/Ae, Q /e ��Q /'ryy • 306 4 q �. 302 ♦ SEE MAP A e :e • 5 S 303 25 12CB SEE MAP `' \ /•'� Rig • • 6 C. 25 12C 40 / N k 310 As' , G 8+ r /,P° \ IC.s a.n5l 9 ..p.'6. 307 ° , OR\Jv�• pNJ�• I. >� /�' Ba °!b 6�A •r 318 •''yf...... ♦ 0 : ;t• �,'.• ` 306 , iR .. T ♦ S. /. tae, I. .. 7� . 0,.,,•-• _, / / )• / 1 0'P.. GR�� 317 `N1,V• ••...c.> / II 311 ° ..0 '316 • 680 }.SWe. e.•••,t .s... z... _. •u a/ / \ 10 CJ' \ ,5\/ i<< .3 24 1661,660,201.ootoa 701 /�702 600 /ecf / 500 x,,- .r 3'S 'l°;. 6200 • goo VA .38 Ac. •'•a ./O/ ^ ./1A 8 // 4// II.Jd At. '\.• .a .pg.,- x t ••o ) •.t: , . 6700 ' Y� 312„ I4 6100 25 0 700•,'',•.s, •o!,. / \O\ II _°314 ; i 22 E 23 1 ry Bv,ac.`\q / \ i 13 6000 S `OO o ---- • '�/ \ •• • 2 $ 21 4 �630b 660057 / 4.. 313 ' p S a ° �,_ a„ 26 ` • 2 e� (CG i• • 12 28,�YBB 6 .x.13 5900 SL- • `°° 4. `l. Y. ° `\ / ,p` \ e 20 LL �•M.(.s•Y ?em ,s.o 650 ♦ �.r ,w A 9 C• �9 0 29 ° 23-74 ;Pte= f 53004 6.., ,' �,�� 6400 6 e° .° ,' ... 01'12 4 5400•'1. 5BOO19 ��. t 1,0 41♦♦ '°// \• ,msµ\ » '.5100 ba. `,•IS '57004 ' ac„•O A. .:«k* 5500'• 1 .� ,, > \ ,.» :5000 y ?a `8 16 �' R4� • 69000 7)M SEE MAP ° / '.;f11 T \ o-.•L �6 II • 16 �� ,•P• s 5600'° 25 1300 ', .� d/ ,... P490 5 Q 4 ,8 ••'0 ..f 7100 • 5 w`P9 ;'° ;000 '4 / \ .}• ,24. r♦ B<.� B IT • 32 FRE t 3�A BA° I , 10 e`•n "7200S/''• 40 WA7K�Ng y Y » aeoo°'o ,d •G .Q .z>'4e. ' _� / \'r 4 i 9 0...• ' 42004 `CY `'7300 33 700031 o•a0n o • \��e' •e\ \ ,ao• /\�d 3 I, S .'P 34 ''''10,•'4 402 p�<5 �`' 109Ae N. ,.ez�y 4100'0 ± ,s\ .23 .. o N. 4700 4 V` ” • 't• 7600 - J C? \ q C7• j 4''. 2 .,.r, 7500 g 37 a 8 ••ee 4!f '° 7400 �4 36 s J' S 4 \ - S 4600 ,. " a•••6• : 35 • ♦ Q I°z000• ,e a • ,AAA .?Aa. c e • ,•a 4400 I s .w 1+ B� AA `� �`R 7 -4 4500 t 5 S •y •° •, AAAA 4i 3'a N. 6 4x A A�.a �'F- 80 .. S i,F .OIA. 4e • AA;. I •mess, ..z.cx. --- z..• e . fL�• ��.. 1 pi et •, .AA'3" 4 Pi. » °uw A 1 7800 .°x;770 1400 1500 1600 1700fe 1800 1900 2000 2100 22002 I ��ix SEE MAP 1'p 2 I .•.II 25 1 2CD 79 �, r'J :• ;•. I ; 0 •8o N 7900 Ia _- '�' •� . ) I3 C r,: P 7A, ;y° J - ioe•e IS �I; ,,„20 .2' .en 22 23 I sn n24 •s/f5 ,.,„..,4,...,. FOR ASSESSMENT ' N PURPOSES ONLY Reooq ;;� ;` :S W HILL VIEW STREET N Do NOT RELY ON - e. N FOR ANY OTHER USE 6s.- ji W • 300042 p 301 •- o io 2900 .e° 2600• e,Io W ..i 2500e 2400 2300 4 N .S1 A°. ..jr _ uo A e = I C N ei .8500'x22 Lti 7S 2" Cor 1 G • Z Hl r J ^ �y6 5 � Zbx 4 1 3.02' S W"5 I t„ 6404: --y, W • >f y, 13 12 >S I � ,B30�v» L1 Q • 2800 e... --- Q`^ 8200 u• U)+ 3200 ,,t 270/0'x 0 9 8 - N 2' L . o R 14 : iN o. 2 _ _ i xf VNO, _L, aX810"" 1.1.,x sop4 Pow, + ^-; - 3700 3800 3900 N- A1Id9`... et _ IS - . 1 ' ,36A.. 06Aa. ISAc. ; ti) Q x.. „,....1. "• 0500 __ - 1. ' fO 3301 :3302 3400 lAr _ a 6900 + .iBAr 3600 o w .8700 ,.x .PPAc. •./BAr.yi 1 n 40A• o: T°6 VS .I � 0 0I• r• 3300.�Brx,. os r ('� - - H .r~. I C7 H °r .`~. _ Og • : a r R r .•I r N 3 s e600 2;or vi a.6°I. ee: I Al 1.. 2 3 4 _ 1.•.5 6 7 ;; T I G A R D )f, .--f°5i`. R�.w.. .rircnr••6r�.rAAMcotmAy!".--- .'STREtt'i"` x..µ.° `'`�.. '-. 2S I 2CC T — - —"-- I SEE MAPS 25 I IIBB »I I - 10 II S.E. CORNER 0. LX . 37 218 . 54 Iii- 5 � 5 89 ° 47'E 139 . 47 . 79.08 64.81 7aI �ti �,, 600 ,S8 A c. . i4 A c. cija• . /dclAc o o0 Fq 5 -�- `ti x N sF� `,�o 0 � 'yi, -, $ 6 if in \� 700 t 9� atri - .89AC. N \ ' N r .,. ome- -..,. _ t' / r / o c, r 41( / / � / Iho- 4) 41‘11- w '\ '�� a �, X°` N 0 ^7 / N kt M / sr 4}, ; t s (,,,,f I", 44» CITY of TIGARD 9,4,-.......,;,,,11,7P4 it 'd .' 3� �_� i *44;r9 * tiiT - � GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM ,,,f,,, 'It 6p.„Y. . • VICINITY MAP k. yv. f Q'r's, ?• .s ,$ '',,IA z r +3f :,ar r "°^: tot 111 11',--4.**;',. �tF �# v p r• , ¢ 6t d s ' 3'f'aa5 .�� 014 i Msn fit, e h k T°. s P, nM f- E k4 3, ,Lf rt c+ , z# tn ...� _ ... .6 :1 a? :p9 Vii` R 4,,,r< ;. it � 4 � ' ,o,ot.A4k ,4" 7 " ' -- ''. t •,�: ,� is x ,- - A--" 11. '- "'ir ,-, ,.-.....,. y ,r= e '` + r ,4,-,%.,4,..,,, ?... , Pi,—,;.„,„:4,,t., a'" y , s 3 a t o• : • £:' t `tib.„ ?'7 � ' ,, , c3.' ' '/14'k • ; '• P."?'° ' '2'," ",'' -4," +44444 '•••" .7. 4 •.-,, .. - , „.„, , ' . *- „,,- , • + * p•' t "44 ,xe r'>< .3 t "€s z¥', " N' ,,,i , ` 1 4*- f„-,4 Sw$`3: p.`r z n"• PPS t °ca .3 `•i.�' j,: 'rsPg �ro 1'.• ,�°. �,. €s .. • It �` � �ef�'^r *d ^q�Y,BAR". '',,i '4�` 1 a 'd"'t.r ¢ Y ' > a bd e ax a d4ilfM x." t y. k L. t ?z 4,, 1 { 'A "'y,,,, y,° t,zdsy$'.', �; • "a, ,'F -,baa ° Y 3 k 6 „"'Ki tWA f'. S .ts.. it/00' ' q• A 0 f I. .FCR E" t ECSC" "�,,. x .VS. d a Y 3 P s s a; a ,.yam 6-,-(-,--.• F� M'41,49 ? cam— \f__ , .. u. � � � �� yea f�' fir -• •`"-� y9' 8 'k� v ,�§� � �� 4{ � 0. .• c _ Y.:414', s+ t C � 41 1 ,,,,g�} •,,. PC i. _ .ir .icea i,/ \, -1 p4 # . 4 '� I ° ,' ''. 'ty"": .." v� S'zs.„,„ . ;.,,, x> "� .• y, � `, ,i...-;,�4' t `�, F i� _-7 til 41,_ _._ P�, u d „qa • r i • %' a ' err aFNc_ Lu I -'.»_'"�° ,v:� .&'�'�a sy''`sitw m F;” ti� --;,k,,..„':.‘ ','� '"'s ,� -.x��, ��"9 zf•�^ ,.t.,.....47,,,,,,,,,,,„:, ,4-, �� - (III ,' 4.w4-,‘,.„.,".,y°w,, sli ,r a $' as "`*„ 4w t" m s :-.4:.:,,,, a g; rY _ ��. z• .yy e `r�d (1tr, '�y ry ';��s,g�w , 'd � .' •b €'" `rf .£ 6 Tigard Area Map / I / «iii u f' ��''`Y! +sx``R'€w + ,3 t° $4 , '' • "��y ! »e a Lf, kkk g s, `". "'(, `^' t' / it �` as xpr'" ,„0„,,,, w'rta' ; -- � �� `' rw� ar� # a7#� �")f Y W 4: �yv^ ' $ Y ,i /:..� 4„,,,,,, N 74 ~' „ + - ` t z a 7 3•Y 'r abl y z?,.i..r' >e, Y ,*.; ' r ✓ 1$ I I. % ,�� "' �9'�.� u^ Y? 0 25 50 75 Feet " ' **?"/ ,.` " s+i'('t i2 o, .dam r',•y• Abp yr'�R r lx ,A �1 a,. ,,, �'L' r ,.� t, t 4+ '«6Y ,i.n_,�, '•`3.,AL°�' s: 'rs 3 .‘,./I a ". a ':,.,.4,, p, ;$`, ^ `� 1"=56 feet • sE�fl' 'it/,. . .. { :44,,4t' � ��:'y'* �+ -,,,:.`=';' M1 . r ,�` 1P� �� .��"'":� «.`P �... s*`A'"�� :It � e�� A.:, "- X41 r. .,.'i' fdq yd } °s % 1+r9�:!iJ �u F y u'. .„4",!..1". " d� �' irk, �� _' ,.. �µ. '"� ./M1T n��° � "�'ittri ,..'r,',„#' ;�nes�'a�l�,4� °��„*3� :atr's�;� s e� Y €r �',•�4 r--n^�`:r°' ,` ". ,r ?, . it � * .:. x X � :� y« �; : � tiy' tf O �1 7C ate�Y['.'� +�4+=x�tsere-.r�!},�t �q,' � � }�,�,K;y3� 3�T' w � *, �,c. 4:4".* �•f",1 .�t+-4 t � s /�"' Information on this map is for general location only and ° e 'S` a^ 't+ r x 'C k < *'' al. s;? +i�r 3'�' should be verified with the Development Services Division s �y r� t4t �¢ �, t _„� � •;x:/',,''',,,,,na 3125 SW Hall Blvd ,?� '4‘;'.'''‘ t . •'t ” b1' 14,4.,, ,?it, ,, t '`�' 0, Cir ' kk. mi • 1' ' 1TigC OR 97223 -:', ft :..5s �.,d„ */ 's ., , 'd !F, 6 * p�,4,• !"'�A4 t. 4«r.l!',tii.r'i / '-`+Y+y w .wR''€• (503)639-4171 -,,,-4-,,,,•,,1*. .R+ It :; i, __,_____/,"" x t` * Yr 7F#t? 'r !3r `y, a�" 7 hltp//www.ci tigardor.us t Community Development Plot date: Nov 25, 2002;C:\magicWIAGIC03.APR ."40''''' : ' • + cITY of TIGARD " w'A �'GY - ! * x , GEOGRAPHIC INFORMS tION SYSTEM ,'' (1„,,,,,,i-,...,:,,, ,, , .,..,,, • �f '� a = ` z : 3z ° � s , y, VICINITY MAP "ss:� .� • "' >.% ':; 4 mfr 'r"t° l x1, Y ;r "" *lv ;.. .• '' _ • k S krys 1 s'sX 3-t 'a T-'" - ' ;".q__ t'° g• -'`. s t a ^` 41)„, s I \ '"a.'..sa:'+re if„6""y#=p ?;,''.4.'''' ,t'\, r \� _ "i. k +, f r,,,,,8,:8,,,,;•"..,47,'- '. ° a f_, x tJ " :w ;. i" _ �°� '`,#' ;# ♦"tea: :kxn r ..=‘;;;,,, -,_•..4 po ;.,.:,:-.,:; . •...".• -.1,'t,.,•;t:','•!.:i ,i,, .. ,: •i' . '11,1r:,;.`'r,,,1-":':":,•'-';'.t,:p,f:".,41;'.-'''•.',''' t p% {gj • [°r:,+>n yr �.,e �a s ''.,,`,,''',"',,s''',;,/";,,:',,r.,,,,,.,'':.',,' �.a' n1 7" ,w i�}. �" ' v.:. R�e13; r 4\ � I.�� • % _,..c,-71, Hr------7.---N 7..-'-' I ri • .'^ ° '3. ,gam v A!, , ,' 4 r A.'7y. n '"R''[ '-',,,09'.1i,' r,7r t a J.-- { y�r` .+.,e, -N. a '. � '.•t. "`• a »z a�`, „" ar .. ; �,v-p.,;,':'4'-' ' ra < ��?��- h; '1,�t�1 rr� p ` Y �,/• .. s" d '3 : v' 5`: a ` -„..:fir � •x ,(,a' ,#' ^z,' ".'-.. -`..'.1 „3 ��' t , 1te: ” .. ,_,*`'. _ -s �..• „,,,,,;./.1.• 's' • ,a ,Nt 3' a Y '''',''''';;..:',!;.,:4, ;;t1:' < ; . • • _,`1ruil.0 apy Q�' i,rx rlvlla q ,gu •A,•g, d A f • ( J c .:- u. . ' .�. � a �k ”[ 9w""b � ,,,,,,:i: r✓ w. J� $�� ).. �: 3k i '' D ,�/'N..-.. ,,Y, ''.,.„ Flrf[FlF NV n'� --P'- '-1-6•'!' )L M �y d ” a s: ,a -.. a 11 M'>v. �" �' .� *�' a"^" � '�y � n7 F.�,,.m y ro t � ;ip � a. cf5 - n „..4 -'.1.A.:a,y ¢; 4 ,� ,y,.+r•s �;:, trititi4'.'!:',4,4.44.'"ifr::::'.1;'' ,4 yv},+bbkY, ti `r '.:.'N d,.• h, fm. t fxTigard AreaMap /"�. i a, .j'.° *��"��,� ,gtSr ,'� "^N :••:'',',•;/ 'r*`°`�+ -�' +C..'.7'11.'�”,, gip,. .r .. ,}" ,•'''' r' K r'" A"7 of.,•,:•„:".44-. { 3 ,{q ;" 'x .�� e • ^ •,? r,� b • z t qs � � b r v aF � .'„,,t s7� ' F l�v y,w. ''!� * �* r,''� �{ .r M • :°°` ".1'' "� '"�R ti:. N 4� "+J ,Fte`� � YF V� y'��d�' Y� "N� ,;.::.,"•'..... 1 `b" '. �,,,,I. , tt, ?�' - ,,vd^4=7'T,v± ��W vb4'+4 y� � ',4'.';':7"1,.c.:,:,,,7;";� • ° �� yt,^4a�,:' ` : ,+•; r , +'#; '>r *'# x x f:, a `' /, eq 0 25 50 75 Feet xu k It p 4 -`" .' •'.••-•;• ' v k 'Y .m># � d'NX ,i `fid Yir , '''9•4; wEk�•, a x ',"--,,tp 1, 1::_56 feet 'Mja 'z aws $,, •`+ r^ bz; p "/...'''''';',.,' '� .3"e:,';'°1 r 1} ,,e,.-' T` y,,< �' .t+ «; a x, 4 t° ,1, 3 r 'ftrf #„e . 'x gyp' • � � v r ;4k444'.': r r w 4 qua` • t t ;,,, Cot. "9,' 2t' 4 4 1 " 1, r ' �.; , „It . i s t� x x` City of Tigard 4,....„;:,4k04420,,,„44.,... „.::?...;‘,,:. r ., ' •',.;.„,f, it,, .,y r r ' 1>' � 'k '# r,� Information on this map Is for general local on only and '! ' : '' \ +. sk +' rT^: ! 1'�' �... }£ :11 +.�x...: 3 should be verified vnth the Develo Development Services Division ,, r + 6 ;+'Di�:l'r ° rvrpr''fiv*4 s^ ' ' w"" 13125 SW Hall Blvd - a s'wl ,�#,� e. EY,�.�., s t-;4 4` l+ PM A ""•r �}:� ley., ,° t {K•*•' l'''''4.1;' ,r'• Tigard.OR 97223 k:y• k$' :i; a,' '`�' °, lio- ,,,,,,,„,,t,,,„:!:,,,,.„ ,:,-,'',01::#;...,0",i'.,' 1 'S• ``,., p e' yah•}; c °• a ,k`,q sg r .'� .ky+r °n 'J. '^'i1t ,x> X503)639-4171 y, -."'�( ti `µ 47 4 �/' Y#�� `:''� hit /wvnvci.ti ard.or.us Community Development Plot date: Nov 25,2002;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR l' s - / N.._/ , . di;.-/ z Cs \ * \IN \_.,,,, .......a..... •i ' Lf-§, Bp. F%aK. 0 1 \ 4 \ . , --------- \r , , ‘ , � , :, ( 0 ... -------- e I , .....--- ,,, \ liB ' / / ..- /' #i 'ftfttS" - /—\-- `` - / ' 4 0 s. 4'de .. 0 or , ,,,--/ ,. , j rte_ PaRxrhG S B r o . ,... ,. �� Q , r ��! i , �- ., �\11111 , _ , _ AVE D\'') , - - , \ / .4. \ S \ • r ------, 41.15............. P AN E 0 Ca ; €r PK. 65 J \ ✓� 257.97 „�/ __� +rte ) N '. • a ffr% ¶T2Z1. O- , / r .. _,..._.. ., ". 7- r ?----,,,t774-7.4:4\ -c•-•lel iiii\\ miii‘-.10,11 in 1 S iit ` !� °#„ sib 1:.k.\' c\litifIgtZ ��'� �`y!.-�,�i 4 ,' x t* 1,'�►�. f uL_ \,�fir., * 0,� k`w, ,< ((]`, ;a-6'\\.� I ,.„...1 !V.._0 • 1 - *\v N- 'Vtio Okt4107)Vf'kriziO 44'CC.7-.;' -9'(' , irn, "k,.,:_l_.1 , V 17 c;11, "'"" A4 fip",‘, . .k( .• , ‘J.•;.,.. ..; .4. ) __•,.,„_..._ . t . 4 , , , ,„ , .: 1 :,-, N ki,-,-A\ . -f4tiffrVir'., SI. .i...14411 - ) • - ;* ' ) "( ‘ (\4ilt•A‘Sk 1 es ' " P- 71.7` 7 • ‘ \ \' IIPN-1*--Pg; 0 ' O'L ''. car,..„- .,. .--,0,07-.'s° `. i *It N fli 4 ....) 1 oi..,1" -,-, 7, 1 i 4. ./ .� te.,11,4;, � G . ItO .V,ctrf V' 44k A • h.✓ \w \ o° o) \ x • .E .._ :0% l�' "r,? •3'qy ' , Ie1io S.... Wc' IG ,1 f -- it ' �,°. ,4 fib• 0�" �`- .;Q\ \\\1 iiiI"r •;0o , F 's, �` N4 ' \ • �v.• e--- i,-4.,,tor , .ia ;' \,•5 _\ .,fig : ), ., a- �c� ..•„` • \ ),:iill !'`:' ,,.='-•1*•�t.\�� : 4%” :V 4.,-. w \ ' I 1 pl { foI- .. r * s'','/I \:..- ,) :(1/lril .. ' . .'.d '' 4 't\, ',ill -.-,<*47.,)' 7,, it - .r ta 11.11- LI .1...,.‘....1,,i, , , It._ „7„,.... ( , .ilfik 0.i.. -..s.11/4"'A ),. 41!11 , ti:(A '/..i,,/ \,''‘:.\. '•: ... j.,' :____,_,.;‘,t. .,...,,.4 gt.,,W. lc•Nr �•1 -moi,iiv , 4 .,,,,,i, \_,s ., 44-4.\\„,„ik.,1 \ ., , , .,--„ ,11.,....). 4'},1 x 1. \ �° s s �/ V.NN -- Jam _ \�' .,,:„..7.:�_°`r NI Vr(k /0\ cD { I. ::1111/7..--,:- ,, _ I . x, Opo• -----'-:-1-77-71';- =.=--- - � i l \`0� . `/° ♦11, 1, ✓ e a FY+r �O''R tI .B+� \',.•°.y,.- ° E �,I p x F \\..„ * 4.7 /.;// ' .4 ! / � <\C7>"i © `1 J x '�� _ ' + am, le„... ,,i „,4 1 +,..._ ,, ,,,,. ..,..,„;,..*.ff ail _ -, a. , alie‘ -'7; ' i: Di 11 N CITY of TIGARD \ " GEOGMAPFI10 INFORMATION 9Y9TEM VICINITY MAP 240 \. _......_ N i 245 \ t/ /1.7rzs=:PF \\ r � FD - �J, ;r c fml ilr..r�.Ry r ._--- y P wrA o • — c -.� ' 1`i' i :��/ F;— - , N. 11/ N Tigard Area Map 7 I ' N, ,, A ) N I I 0 25 50 Feet 250 1'=36 feel 1 1 ---...\ 141/141-111 I City of Tigard N, I Information on this map is for general location only and i should be verified with the Development Services Division. j 13125 SW Hall Blvd \` Il Tigard,OR 97223 \ /' (503)639-4171 http://www.ci.tigard.or.us Community Development Plot date: Nov 25,2002;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR . 30. 00' Handicap Parking Easement '.'3" Trash Enclosure Caro ................. Ar•ea•: Grass Area Exit Drive 25 . 00' 10 foot landscape strip 5 foot sidewalk .01 42.22' -- 1--1110 . I of 121 . 11' Mo v.-"X Lt vi -)'- z, 55 .00' ( 4 Trash nclosure Covered Canopy A . ? 15 .00' I $ oil 45 . 00' Customer I GA ic-0... Lounge 3 Bay Shop' Area 30. 00' 50. 00..' Ii r 7 i I, 144-22.22' -1101 a' ,„ j- 2' 10 foot landscape 1 5 foot sidewalk Pacific Hwy 4 1111/1.1 Covered Canopy 15 .00' +22.22' 50.00' Trash .Enclosure 3 bay Shop Area 441 Customer 45 . 00' Lounge 30. 00' Exit Only Landscape(Grass) VDriveway 20.00' Landscape 10 Foot Landscape 5 Foot Sidewalk MAR 18 '03 12:07PM VLMK ENGINEERS P.1/1 CleanWater , Services RECEIVED our cominitincot is (kill-, MAR .1 8 2003 March 17, 2003 VLMK Consulting Engineers Attention; Jennifer Kimura 3933 SW Kelly Ave. Portland, OR.97201 Re: Tigard Quicklube site located at 13515 to 13555 SW Pacific Highway in Tigard, OR CWS file 2731 (Tax map 2S102CC, Tax lots 00600, 00701, 00702) Clean Water Services has reviewed your proposal for the above referenced activity on your site. Staff has conducted a pre-screen review and requested completion of a Sensitive Areas Certification Form. Following the review it appears that sensitive areas do not exist on-site or within 200'from your project. In light of this result, this document will serve as your Service Provider letter as required by Resolution and Order 00-7, Section 3.02.1, and your Ston-nwater Connection authorization from Clean Water Services as required by Ordinance 27, Section 4.B. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local, state, and federal law. This concurrence letter does NOT eliminate the need to protect sensitive areas if they are subsequently identified on your site. If you have any questions,.please fee!free-to call met- 3-846- 55S; .- •- • ---. Sincerely, Chuck Buckallew Environmental Plan Review E;\Development Svcs\SP 00.7\Concurrcncc Lcttcrg\2S102CC00600.00701.00702-no lens area spl and sc,doc 155 N First Avenue,Suite 270•Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 Phone: (503) 846-8621 • Fax: (503)846-3525 •www-cleanwaterservices-org FEB 03 '03 11:35AM VLMv rp F .2/3 _ FEB Q 3 2003 j file L .Z 7.311 CleantiVater \` Services By Our commitment i, clear. ensitive Area Prescreening Site Assessment Jurisdiction 64-ti C - 1 '1C7t12-4 Date C Map & Tax Lot • " — ,�4 Io Owner s` n. �a "'"'" X Site Address CC C,I 007 C.— � Contact I i frIA Jett,— Proposed .- -Proposed Activity r tC.4 - I Address i eadv01 f G E- ( SH ` - r (.� Cf-- taPhone OSESZ2 3- t Y N NA Y N NA [Z] ❑ Sensitive Area Composite Map ❑ n ® Stormwater Infrastructurenf/ maps Map#r z5/ (-J,4 QS#r '1 If 1 Y N NA Y N NA ❑ T1 M Locally adopted studies or maps ❑ ❑ Z. Other Specify Specify Based on a review of the above information and the requirements of Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards Resolution and Order No. 00-7; Sensitive areas potentially exist on site or within 200' of the site. THE APPLICANT MUST PERFORM A SITE CERTIFICATION PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER OR STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT. If Sensitive Areas exist on the site or within 200 feet on adjacent properties, a Natural Resources Assessment Report may also be required. I ] Sensitive areas do not appear to exist on site or within 200' of the site, This pre- screening site assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered on your property. NO FURTHER SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. THIS FORM WILL SERVE AS AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE A STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT. The proposed activity does not meet the definition of development. NO SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. Comments: Reviewed By: Date: y6/0 3 Returned to Applicant Mail X. Fax Counter 155 N First Avenue, Suite 270 • Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 Date ?./63/03 By fe— Phone: (503) 846-8621 • Fax: (503) 846-3525 www cicnnwaterservic:,s,org File Number CleanWaterr Services Onr commitment is clear. Sensitive Areas Certification Form Property Owner Nam ) ! r ^ A i 2—Ca—1 S(>0 CitylState/Zi t t Telephone Fax E-mail Authorized Agent Name v L c_c/ ,1c J ` , 17.1 c� Address �C L 1 CitJte/Zi �LJM1 w ^� �,2 g/ t Telepho�tg t7- F 24 E-mail� . . 171/ - c Project Location Slrget,�ad, othgr descriptive loc � ' ��- /` _ j ,, , ,� l�✓-�S l -}� � Legal Description: Quarter Section Township Range In or ar(city or tow Count Tax Lot# oL t, o5,R5 .t Tax M 2S102GG Dov, .7 I , 7o 2 Waterway River Mile Latitude Longitude Adjacent Property Information: Street, road,or other descriptive location Legal Description: Quarter Section Township Range In or near(city or town) County Tax Map# Tax Lot# Waterway River Mile Latitude Longitude File Number An on-site,water-quality-sensitive area reconnaissance was completed on: Date By Title Company A. Existence of Water-Quality-Sensitive Areas As defined in the District's Design and Construction Standards, water-quality-sensitive areas: ❑ do ' rdo not exist on site (check appropriate box). ❑ do '<do not exist within 200' on adjacent properties, or ❑ unable to evaluate adjacent property(check appropriate box). • If water-quality-sensitive areas exist, complete Section B below. • If water-quality-sensitive areas do not exist, skip Section B, sign this form and submit to the District with plan approval package. B. Types of Water-Quality-Sensitive Areas The type(s)of water-quality-sensitive area(s)that occur on site or within 200 ft on adjacent properties are (check all that apply): ❑wetland(s) ❑ spring(s) 0 intermittent stream(s) 0 perennial stream(s) 0 ponds Sign this form and submit to the District with plan approval package and one (1)copy of the Natural Resources Assessment Report(information and forms are available through the District). • The Natural Resources Assessment Report includes: • Wetland Delineation Report per DSL/Corps reporting requirements (if wetlands present). • Rapid Stream Assessment Technique Form and maps or other District-approved assessment(if construction or discharge is proposed into, through, or across an intermittent or perennial streams). • Vegetated corridor documentation, including a base map and photographs showing the surveyed location of all sensitive areas, vegetated corridors, and vegetated corridor condition. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this document, and to the best of my knowledge and belief,this information is true, complete, and accurate. Property Owner: ��/✓�I/1 L1� - L iCil l'- ? 'U'wt C i�( � fv�t Pri.t/TYP e Name -- Print/Type Title Y Sig ure Date / / / / //, ', c.,,s. , / // // / /z/ /y / / // / // / A 14--d, .---' 1/ / ///// / a L % '4'4''''1, idt.- - //' ////////// I1I. I : NEW 6.0'TW000; ( (!� j �t,jilfe / -i o 1( ,I i' h 2 � � { E�� // 0 o-�r,,p uIL I IIE �Fr�� v� oILLjt Ii,11'IITLIiL1111,*1- I' c! i EAISOG BUILCD{ I '� t I:{IIII�IIil1 :pi–,'-: TYPICAL �// / A :s``ti1` t� i1l �� i �'I i� i , `r //11//7/ -- — ° � 11', � U1--',„1.1.1.1 E r �I IJ �� o°y%�m� ! III }. 'a '� 1, Ci i��11i's; % s� cp III I'II {;i . �" / I i�'iEy ,• Fo C G ZONE ls r i l! I j i ueDEoPED MEA �� I I ' i ,Ire 4' '��(, s_ 2 7 -E, Iliill '1I'Ir' ny' Oul �0 P , I, I ,' I ,,Ily / % o 10 ,) ill ,y I I�� o %/ I�{ te S 3315.17'" W 233.3 I,�' /�F? . L /�/ „----•'-z:i / A" 700 ofl;4zoNE , / �' C—G ZONE °i ? 1� �A�� , m P� 1I -,1,11 Li ''1% % % ��/ w • tl I _11/ ftfr, , . L l, - . •I __ r ��(zl6nNc TRE T T 3/7EM ///": ,, ,„ 1 „H ; -,. , •. , 6. ., .„ 0 �' EXISTING STRUCTURE I -—i go't.. TO BE REMOVED 2 IQRY D RA _C tea– - Qw . ( IL �; -ti i , ',IF � // � A l' — �� I /BIKE RACK j P 0 1:1' i }f I i' �6S s ( _61 i.,[1i , t �w °� d �7� ,i , a � LS 3F ,4„„):,....:54,-,-,--7:-:,,, �✓ 1 o ` it-3I! ,Iii {T, 1 ,, ,, fir y . a 7 ( mss. 1 1__LI JL_1__ — —_____I r — - y� ' `i 2 p .'r, u, _I_.._. I_-I I--� -- 1 �...-- CURB CUT ��.1..._M�III ■�V It _..._ , L l ._... .__..._ _... __L_ _ .. PER SHEF L-1 NEW STREET TREES r y 5 WIDE SL E ASE14h�J I L, o _�} ._._ _ — ti . PLR t3,IGn 3�� f PC;f: dam& I `� -F P ��CIII 11Ca1 \Nr\ l' RAISED ISLAND? i LEFT TURN LANE Tillie, -4. I T - c \ L . 1 IC S _I ) \ r1--1 ETT SCHOTT & ASSOCIATES %'` Ecologists & Wetland Specialists N 11977 S. Toliver Rd. • v1olalla, OR 97038 • (503) 829-6318 • FAX (503) 829-387-1 SENSITIVE LANDS REPORT For the Tigard Quicklube Introduction: The Tigard Quicklube site is located at 13515 to 13555 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard, Oregon (2S102CC00701, 702, 600). There are existing buildings on all three tax lots. The property to the north is entirely developed. There is a house and yard on the tax lot to the west, and the lot to the south is mostly vacant. The vacant lot is dominated by Himalayan blackberry and tall fescue. There is about 10 feet along the western property line that is undeveloped, which is dominated by Himalayan blackberry and tall fescue. There are no wetlands or drainages adjacent, or on the property. Most of the surrounding land is either blacktopped or has buildings. The property to the east is a residence or apartment, but there are no wetlands or drainages in this lots yard. The vacant lot is dominated by upland species, and does not have a drainage. 4 i / Yrs ,�.\ ! ! ' ' 1 - I ? J _m „-,..7.,"171'4,..-W';',?'''' '' JA ory ;y '' +reti L t' S - N. F 'omP., „„i„,..;- ' * , Photo taken at Southwest corner looking north Schott di Associates Quicklube Project 11977 5 Toliver Rd. Molalla,Oregon 97038 503-829-6318 'CONSULTING P 503.222.4453 ENGINEERS F 503.248.9263 E vlmk@vlmk.com 3933 SW Kelly Avenue • Portland • Oregon 97201-4393 W www.vlmk.com PRELIMINARY STORMWATER REPORT for QUICK LUBE 13565 S.W. PACIFIC HIGHWAY(99W) TUALATIN, OREGON S.W. % OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, WASHINGTON COUNTY March 4, 2003 PROF-s fi •n� �y Oa. Prepared by: Robert Leger VLMK Job Number 203007 IStructural Engineering • Civil Engineering • Industrial Engineering • Planning • Studies / Evaluations • Entitlement - QUICK LUBE Tualatin, Oregon PRELIMINARY STORMWATER REPORT March 4, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Site and Project Information 1. Site Vicinity Map 1 2. Site Map 2 3. Site Grading Plan 3 4. Project Information 4 5. Stormwater Narrative 5 - 6 II. On-site Stormwater Facilities for Quick Lube Site A. Water Quality/Quantity Facility Design 1. Post Development Areas 8 2. Water Quality Calculations 9 3. SBUH Information Summary 10 4. On-site Drainage Basins 11 5. Site Utility Plan 12 APPENDIX A. USDA SCS Soil Survey and hydrologic classification Al thru A2 B. SCS Runoff Curve number Tables B1 thru B2 C. Design Storms per CWS Cl WO LLIL-Lu 6E- 2000 7 k''"" B -----.1".." C D E F ® 21` PFAFF J/,IF4 + 5 PMilliffli! T W Z 3 �'� U TIGARD 6WRIN S{ P WINTER IpKE ME l't .. m N. LEWI $ • , 3 "s FALCO RISE M 449 �!/ Z `;- (` 11(.*-'4111111 Apt' 'm • E L A';'" ANt TANGELAF • , �` Q KATHERINE • rn F. O Jr.,....,,... �„•0 � 4NN (�1 KA EN K CI YDESDAL- p'% :R.. I WALK I 0. tis ce 4 MARIE T1" ERROL ■ '1S0 .� 'Q� lip • 73 A< �I �� ` �' FR 4 � hill •RMEN 3 \ Lit%% ALBERTA 1 . R It k NNER 5\s MORGEN (A `�� Alms. Z — — DAMES—. , :: .EIL `v �`sQ•,Cfl !i, --\ IW'—. �O 0 ®y r� I • �� –� MARION �Q PARK _ ` YARNS : ii. V�i Z COOK �V ZC >4. i OMARA U �� ryQuicklube ,i,i PE 5 FAIRHA Y iii ROSE VIE MOUNT GARDE PARK °r pO 'IGEWOOD R: INA VISTAL.. , I HILLVIEW �•AARD' V®IIIIII AMES ®11!!!!!! . c ® � MCDONALD sumo 'rLYNE CHAR ®, �iV rn ELROSE •y CR EK r ;--.'DUCHI LY $ - 111l MCfA LAND y r MOUNTAIN VIEW �Oti w VIEW:Ri GREEN:WARD FA O.• WEA ER WILDWO.� G •V1BOTA 6 BULL MfJUNTAI�. ®�h INEZ ELEM�R co GV' C2 I lu RDOCK :Ill immill." PINES`00 h F VIEW J'E ® ASPEN RID = g DEL 0 TE EIDI SC'E 2 11 (-1-* Q °S?) ''&4 :PE•pERT 11. ES i •EILI G J ��"�'�' ' ; iii1rII •OS�� 1 TLE WOODS n' B C D E F t Quicklube: Page & Grid 655 D5 , o 7 0 0 2'43 OCR 7 777- 7 2iii A A4111011113111!'' ' v.7.-- --,'--V-.' Cik 114.'1 , 7 1\ , 0.... „to N./. 0'7, .,.. , .--'' C6C,14A' .- 4••1- .ef ' ,' TISA ,.... if!III, talt3 ..." 'I- \ ...s 1, 7 .1\' - tfo, 4' \ •.,("iz. --. It S 6c,, ..- . Foe_ cuT-t)(a.E. i„ 7 ./-lii " 11., ,.11, \ 7 -4 11 I ..., ' •IIVII \ 7 \ li 'Z'S,,.‘:.0 goo %iii ' K So p e.. E.LOPS f lei'.‘ 9,,,,,. 4 .r,.. , o,0 q.?.:1'A 4.Iii 0 I‘ f•-.,.. ., A ‘.. ce..•95-^0 y,44 . a ‘C. CP• ..............„„<"''', qri,., -P, q . # mi 13 .''.- .., •111 - * lli 1 ' <: lc _ 7 S 331517 W 233 99' \ \ ) . \ "'/) 710 1 Tr co r , i hi \ ,/ ...,- \ _i„ 4: 11 \ i .,,/,, , 4.. int'e. II / I- eptiiINGRAIIF ,i. , l'o ,e h, I- ln -11 el * Ir'' ,,c, , 0' 11 1 ‘ i I I , II. .8, 111. --.• • i ',,,4,0' ) 4: 4 .1. 4 ,,„ foN\ :.111,,,,' ,, J--, NS t \ \.,\ ''r \ \ \Z 1 i tft tr___440.0,144.:, I 1.° -r, 1 1 1, 1 A I i 2 STORY WOOD FR E lc , .90:4.-:---1. i: 1.• FF Ea . 2.4 , : .2). II%) tw.‘ Z ..., 10 I 4 ,__ ... sP. , , k• 0, i ' •, t ..,, .0. bli 0 El 111911:,:,il; — wilio ,. ' ,------- , .. , Iiimoisin, Iliminimll'''11:1!,1111:, , imil1, , ._ _ ,i01 el CURB CUT cip BUT ' CU 8 0J-T • _ _ ...___ _ _____ _ _ .....73 BIKE LANE _____ ____. _ ____ _____ _<>_v._ _ _____ 1 - '.-- 0 0 •II."' r i.' elillfil 5' WIDE SLOPE EASEMENT • -, - ro- --------'- PER 800K 342, PAGE 258 . 1 .4•0 D_. 0:11:3 + A- -.,..==-....,..,....x.......v......„ -, a P AC IF-1C-- HI G-H W-P Y-- — a---, --- „ . _---,3 - RASED ISLAND z'- J LEFT TURN LANE )----iiiii-te— -.7 atJ. S . HM HWAY 9 9 W : 1-11 pr7-71 _. 007 _- x45 I Av 701 � ..4,'f a� 4Sa :Are.' /� ` ../ \ -6..(..&•„. • IQ 0 f: - . o' Vis- .., /s. Q . 1,ss*AA ,Ektf..111,,.1,01C.,..:(... C,r,;`�'?• ��j�• i, 246..E AC ,y "ri'I;t1 (� ////, CP .' . � 47.,. T fti% i, $.9 tc, -P /6 , ,246.'. A ,�, 'lig .�,` os ,_ ii ..i `�' 's. S a. vim© A4 �,� • cY '� , rtc*,; c.. A fr L• 2 -Inn `k` S,`` S O�c^l`, 45.6•i,41 q•+�.�/•Ij,1P: �� 1<"'• . . 1245• a' •. • �, i�. �% 1. "0 Ac ♦� • • �_ st;`,� "33.15'17" W 233.99'., 1' "� 4 .2 Y 9 ' 4 , 7 0 1 , _ ....._ , „op _ Air.r . ti-'.it / N �i�7 � ,�jj1 -401. ,. i A 9C 9n p 745AC 1�� , µ541A7. _ 01116k1: • ("/ -4.' _____-_ •A 'pd "� I '44.. ", I 1 L 1 _ . • {(r ! 24' ERI O M. 1 , ,,� ,I�� 'I t1 V��i iyo'' i tS ` � 45. TC;,- ' ,t. , !: O ie a E�24s. I h 1 484 Ac I��, i � ' ''sir `.gel 't ...o i // 0 ti t I �, ar' i� A , '\-' , .N...,. -i...,1 - 6;0: ------- 45.07\ 4i. \ . ' pp FF 245.1 1 1' 1. r 90 • ,�y�� I 't 2 STORY WOOD FR' E 'F4.t I �i�, ,� �� d ° 4.L .i1Fl--- --- .FF E V - 242.70��A, o.,.,. Ac j� 4.a4 Lp�sy.�3o'm�i ©' OS 1_•, v---' A 4... TO._' iaiffi is 1.`•=-.-2`"".1•-•-•--11.1114- -Pala , Ip • I,,, I 244.50 A•'' t O` BEGIN NEW CURB ,, % S9 ,`s,1 +` l , 2- -,A I Y ; .'1■ � ,r ` .4 O e'AND 5.5•SIDEWALK ?'� ; /nits E7' 1 ♦ �,`, � :. 2 .08 TC �+ WrIll �. �'`5_° '' /� dy ` P .. its .. ` ___.:1- .,_v .�: -.,.:w.....,.. DOSnNG , I• .' rc al ai` }a ,1 �; -al DR. To •�j ••. 6.�� LS >: AN `�f ' 1`/ {1< i ,�� ' j.•7 .61,� 9� CA � A_ z � •-_ 122, S 1 �t .. . _. 1-7-1, 4144. ..... . , k RB CUT .."-.'4.4•N2.;., 'r''u-..,U•kil UT ` Q • �.; 4.� •f Com, 6 ( � � E_.. � ,.. , � .... It/11144.LAN__. �......,., ,._ �.a. ..... _...__ ._. s. .� _� .. .... ....�- 7� a�. • 2.0' P - .yl A. ,` '814 �IKE E 44.7 - .45.25 i '', ^4 .,',_ QF _�. _�` ._ T �'iC .. . -1.' ♦ , �� n in EJ65.A , 4.6 X� - _ -� �. �.. h aANP 5 DE,SLOPE EASEM NT 4.8 AC D TRAN97!pt1 LENGTH AS NE 'o „_NATQ4 EXIST. PER BOOK 342, PAGE'258 PRON DIST.CURB HEIGHT TO .T.. O. - - - . la GRADES,--4:42 ,,`r' . - . .. NEZLURB?f10. .5'.WAII(_ ` ` N._ NE =CURB HEJGtIT. _- -_ (\�,` A •,, ,1, 14 SLOPE I, SEE SECTIgN D-6 THIS 41EET ,O Z 5%MAX.LONGITUDINAL SLCPE', Ii •Yif n `PACIi IC IG WA - , l', � .__ -... _. .mow- �Atw tr 1- RAIcErT 14 ANIT • -} . ,ccT n,PAI,Auc Ii PROJECT INFORMATION The proposed project is located at 13565 S.W. Pacific Highway (99W), in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. The entire property includes three lots (Tax lots 25102CC-00600, 00701, 00702)and is approximately 0.60 acres in size. Approximately 0.33 acres will be developed at this time. The proposed development will involve the construction of a 4,000 sq. ft. building and site development of 0.33 acres. Only a portion of tax lot 701will be developed at this time. Utility stubs will be provided for future expansion. Survey information used is from a boundary and topographic survey of tax lots 600, 701, and 702 in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. The survey was provided by Hickman& Associates, Inc. (1705 Lee Street, Lake Oswego, Oregon,phone: 503-697-6869, Hickman drawing number 30103). Additional private stormwater information was obtained through an underground utility locate service (MRP, 800-200-0457) and potholing (Rain Country Construction, 503-637-3500). All stormwater facilities and conveyance systems for this development have been designed per the Unified Sewerage Agency(USA) "Design& Construction Standards for Sanitary Sewer and Surface Water Management"manual dated February 2000, and the Oregon Department of Transportation(water quantity control and offsite conveyance). Additional design information used was obtained from: • The USDA SCS "Soil Survey of Washington County" • USDA SCS TR-55 "Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds"(2nd Ed., June 1986) Software used in design: • King County 'HYD' program,version 4.218 • Haestad Methods `FlowMaster' program, version 5 • Microsoft EXCEL95 • AutoCad 2002 K:\Engineering\Civil Calcs\203007\203007 Prelim Stonnwater Report.Doc PAC-4IA - I STORMWATER NARRATIVE - On-site Stormwater Facilities for Quick Lube Site On-site storm runoff from paved areas, roof areas and some landscaping areas will be routed to a Stormwater Management Stormfilter catch basin which discharges the stormwater to the on-site water quantity(detention) facility. This facility has been designed as an underground detention tank (48"Aluminized Steel Pipe). Discharge into the tank is via one of two locations. One point will come from the Stormwater Management Stormfilter. The other point will come from a water quality swale area drain. Water Quality: The swale will provide stormwater quality treatment via the minimum 9 minutes residence time required in the system. Water quality in the swale is achieved by sedimentation of suspended solids and sorbed pollutants from the influent stormwater. The swale will essentially function as a shallow clarifier to achieve this unit process. Hydraulic efficiency will be maximized by the geometry of the swale (length to width ratio, shallow depth of flow); dead zones and short-circuiting will be minimized as plug flow through the system is maximized. The swale is approximately 36-ft in length. The 0.065-ft/sec velocity for the water quality event in the 36-ft long swale will produce a residence time of about 9 minutes before the treated runoff enters the quantity control tank, via a trapped area drain/catch basin. The swale was designed using a 4-inch depth of the grass in the swale. If the grass in the swale gets taller than 6-inches it should be mowed. The Manning's Coefficient used for the design of this swale is n=0.24. The area draining to the swale is less than 4300 sf. The required Water Quality Flow (WQF) for the entire developed site has been calculated to be 0.005 c.f.s. (T=48 hrs). Water quality requirements will be exceeded by the use of a StormFilter catch basin and a swale. Because WQF to the swale is minimal, the WQF used for residence time is based on T=4 hrs. Water Quantity: The private stormwater system discharges into an Oregon Department of Transportation system. As instructed by the ODOT Geo/Hydro Section, water quantity control events are per Clean Water Services requirements. Post-development water quantity flows for the 2, 5, 10, and 25-year events will be released at the respective pre-development rates. 25-year detained volume is estimated at 770 cf. Water Quantity control will be accomplished by two or three orifices in the outlet control structure (PVC standpipe). Events in excess of the 25-year event water surface level will overflow directly into the outlet control structure. Should the orifice become plugged, the peak water surface level for the 25-year event will rise 0.20-ft above the peak 25-year water surface level. The 6" diameter outflow pipe from the control structure (HDPE pipe at a minimum slope of 0.007 ft/ft) can convey a post-development 25-year event. K:\Engineering\Civil Calcs\203007\203007 Prelim Stormwater Report.Doc The peak water surface elevation has_been estimated at this time to be X41.50 for the post- development 25-year event. Routing calculations will be provided with the Final Stormwater Report. All on-site conveyance pipes will be designed to convey the post-developed 25-year event flowrate as calculated using the Santa Barbara Unit Hydrograph method via King County's `HYD' software. Haestad Methods"Flowmaster" software will be used for swale and-pipe conveyance calculations. HDPE pipe with a Manning's coefficient of 0.010 will be used to size all onsite conveyance pipes. A proposed Operations & Maintenance Agreement for on-site stormwater facilities will be attached to the final report. The pre-development time of concentration calculated for the Quick Lube onsite stormwater facility design was Tc=0.27 minutes. A minimum Tc= 5.0 minutes was used to determine the pre- and post-development flowrates that will be discharged. K:\Engineering\Civil Calcs\203007\203007 Prelim Stormwater Report.Doc 9p,(, (0� On-site Stormwater Facilities for Quick Lube Site K:1ErgineeringlCivii Catcs1203007\203007 Stormwater Report.Doc a / gy ' " ' v , / / i / ��o7 o< \\ / / 9s \ // � 7/ ' IIIIII;'iIIII \ ' ,77\ // A 7 Il777 l 1iIIIIIII) I I'Ih,,iI' \ r ill /\ '/y�o It1p \\ ,--- '1,..r • 11II 11 � / • T7'",„ '° 11o \ / 4o� l to / s. A S II J Q:, III i I L n `1�t�P ;.; ! 1 II 0 - ' I Ilii. \\ ��('1 ,•hj �i IIj li , ISO •- 'VI.,\ I �� 1 I 'lil �Q �CL Fort)(L ;SII , \\ // illi inti li O I;,I 4 Ii�1Ili l �. Ili ;1,1 111111 �,T o. J mC, \ \ // I, II I I t II * Ue ki E-I. opo!and 1 ...-- ',III1 illi •y o;Qr �� \ IIIIII I I I 1,11:14, `��,/ +I Z o \ sr Q, 1I c. \\\ 'o d. • �i.li (i.-0.27 At., o, �Q_ r �O• S'„hl \ / APgL ` o�, ' • !.1111 / IF a;,•„,iiIIIIIIIIIII l ��I S 33'15'17” W 233.99' I -:: 0 ,� ��, ("\-7-... hi \ Ts 0,1"0 \ r — Il'i `l 0714 ' f T- .__ 4e ` - f \ / J Y,OCO FRAME ! I Os BUILDING �1 II lI \ s 1® 21v� I�o1 SF �,+, SDI �}e—.> e / 1'14 / Qso� — I I ■ ', ISI,l�, I 11111i , / t in v Oh it Hill \ \ ___1 i .,,, !!1,1, 1,1 11 f a. �. 2 STORY WOOD FRAME 1 y-- C- FF E I a 1� 'iI III *�I�IUI, _�.. — '..s ij _ , :1 1 ilil**'* j I �,o I. ► Iii i iuI III l'b v... � p 'I ,�7 ' I Ij� Itl fI1, i�l��I 1 Ipll i II,V1 �s � # �I( t 1 I 'I, Ilh ll,illl 1JI� I i�i 11 1� III 11�,14i1 ��o I LS n` i n Ili .I 11''.' It�fl ll i'la IH�IlI�l I ' I I1,Il'{{y�� I y `` -- - - � I �� P. � I�I J III A I f IEr, I.. CURB CUT 'VI LIKE LANE O r r y S'■!, 5' WIDE SLOPE EASEMENT - ■ .o — r,,. PER BOOK 342, PAGE 258 �� v — — "' u n: — 1- .4_ ' PACIFIC HIGHWAY— - - RAISED ISLAND �'� J LEFT TURN LANE CA ci A ;; � �u U. S . —HIGHWAY JWu �• oma — .-- a� Job 0I kC L1)5E �1 072-D�: ONSULTING ENGINEERS Client 3933 SW Kelly Avenue • Portland • Oregon 97201-4393 JobNo. 10O.7 By P 503.222.4453 503.248.9263 Q Date 0 M?Q heetNo. V Atil 7Y (A I c..L)L r-/o s £M Ti 2E S i42ER 2_.C,, lc (0 �� Z�, IC I SF) F�_ 3 0,00 S = Q QWC� �N Avo wt Ax . LIZ 47)0 H X3� �� • -SSP- t t t,JA-i q-A2- trl A-,JAG lwl aif17 T- STOZyvi F/L.Te(2 cora_ i)G Q,,.)Q ©.0 3 Pr% .�. ONE STOP,✓11FC_A-2rrL,D6P u►2La roe F_A)77 rD�v E-wP tE-r) S 177 "gOr F027"lao-) Or -sire_ CA JNor e&e._ 6,19/vvTb STSzir1Ft LT c$ . Ur)/7 s 5er.JA-1 -E,. --- 0. 0007 FYYs... s ` � 'err)(11.S 1+(2)63000r� Too 6,44 ft-L.. 1 US E. q H 2 E J EM 7- 01.0Q�it,2 - 0. 00 9 5.�- X02 Jttc->G SLC. CONSULTING J.4 v_4. 1 1 it1 W ENGINEERS Client 3933 SW Kelly Avenue • Portland • Oregon 97201-4393 P 503.222.4453 503.248.9263 Job No L7 Sy K-.� �- Date'0 1" 1^�T�,� Sheet No. A .?‘A 1. g, ` 5 LI sr (o. /zi _) -78 (c pts rrE.) l, A . 7, sol sF (0, 7, 4L.) 78 l r 2011 GI SF Co. c000 4;> POST-- 'D L.,owvt eivr : G� ?A , 39 25 SF (0 09 0 A-c.) �N A l2,23sr ( o, s / o Ac ) 9S i ADD ADD iTTO,UA-C_ OFFS/ 2030 Sr (0, 09-7 a-L� 9 1 ori: 2$, ICt sF co, cog-7 AO YAc ID Z©30CD-? 7O1 ', 2, >.y ; ' 9( . • v a C.F � i4,7•4. , „„. , , .... „,/EXISTING BUILDINGS y, �. TYPICAL • i j '\ - 1r C G ZONE T i c v 1 CM .g. +6 - s 7q0 a #.. 4 C G ZONE rr yi f Jf f A .>i 4. .F i"L . .VF • . t ;i is ;',' I •I [1, o0 1^' .t V' ,.; k 4j a Boz �._ >•i f� 1 ` l FF 245.16 I„, • i `f r�- "1.."-c, ' _f c-- hr 1 .,� ♦ 742.9560"IE 2}0.40 .C.O n s ' R)N s rt ‘,,; t l ':1 3k t , 3 I i i3 ,I t v ., f., O d \'<c,p�P CSS l A \09p-9 ° \SSip o L�., 1, ...•J 6'IE 239.45 H'E 239.37 �- 701 ,,,,,,e , 14°91-61 f1 '0 sm, iS // a l\ u I it .-- ) ....-.4 9,, i s• / sus, ° s\ i o ms's. A �$ , / ? y .3)\ os / ``O , , .s' 4. ,. lel • "*441P- / TS. 4. ler ....... \ / / S /\ "t`�O� A 4' 9• QL h gJ� tatl I� �ll�`••. r- f"J ,:d itrsr, t: L / 3'WAT. ..- / s � / S 3'15'17" W 233.99 P� tea. P •,•��1 �, ', /Al r 72- Illirat / Fii 700 -- -- -- I i j 4e ili �/o 3.y \ Ts '' 7O, 0 O• I \ 10,— ` • ,........._ ,t-_,T3....HDPE i( i. i O. �� ' S-0.0070 MIN. 0(:pri .M \ gip; to'UTIUtt ( cI - -24/y2- .-- HI _\\(1/4r.;\141" \ lV 17E-T. / ®v .I EASEMENT 1 (!/, e/ ,� / ....,: 6•• .. 1 1 , I I I i?a , I V i 0 4 A`�11��\ TA-N rn __I •. I / 50.01.C' -- -1 , I ''': /9 , -s, I 1 ./ .� 7 ® -- —`— Ott. _l____11 1 ;Ir 6'NOPE 5••0.0030 I a*HOPE I 1 7O, '_I 9O I I FF 245.1 li I ` • ti •� INSTALL VAULTS WTH TR C '.IL.I - - �'+L �� RATED UDS FOR FUTURE U I �— � FF`E�V:I �42.70��\ JQA,t, ...,,..... BMSA01491E SUDO NOT' I �,��5 s0.n WSTALL METER OR DOUBLE I L s. ` .- .r1To 01EO(ASSEMBLY. CAP BOTH IE 243.46 ,�� P Z0s .0� S ENDS aF 3'PIPE. - l 3 2-3'PIPE 00. _� 14,1 f S E 243.56 ■� __ ;� q,..,---a. - I _ ...�.,..��...�: ...>..._..-LS * I © 2 3 PIPE-..!!",...„N..11 � _______c, tib . �.^. ��02 I ■ 7) I 5�' •1 4211k.. 122.30' 62.0' SP G . 'b �1 ',`niiwair.- rs516... 'i.CT■�� iLIFF� i�c" I 1 i I I ill (.._ I i _ - c T T Fu1fF 1 eNF T v T T T T T T T.. T — — — _ — — — — r r— 5' WIDE SLOPE EASEMENT n ° N- PER BOOK 342, PAGE 258 • ,} };sr 6�.i ` .0`.sg w,h''-� N. .ter r.+.1 h1R74�..'l�l '. • ++i•7iTt � �s w:,,,:.:cf,t� '•'.4, ` '�-" •.S1^1 ^' •.i. ,.i 7 ''!se''.,s •A • • in 11- o o ''+h'y Y 1 a r ( it '�_; r � /. :lb '! `Q , . - ••.1 ` i'B,r` • zs• �{u�� fl-''. 'J„! � _c, ��A �.JskIAW '..f�•. .�. ln..` 1 . y `F. 4 1 1 fib-1,.. 1 =adv ( tttioyi, O iy !3 �1- a! r' iii G .J V ►r1,1- 1i, ig O • •�� 'Y y•�`��' �� , �„ sh+��' *�� c �•�• 1'�ri;,,i.� F^Si•1� �.ta.;��p'`,' �'- I:,�'!'�� } l(tf` , ��jd�•,;,,,:;-. .‘i,.--,,,,,,-0 < .. 3�.. L:. ., tz _ + a -(S0,' ' .a' C�r ,A I, L� hr `f4 .�.CJ {r 4' a 1 �:1 Y f ".4t.•• .. .' ��: i.."4„;;.: 4. 1-+ >v *sN r ,. j to ``` Tr• ° s ��s'!!1 i/t `�\ � „i 2, Wd '"'f.. .�' ter •. 4.:r' f'`• c .I'4:,�,,, 7t444 !� "++c -' 3 h lit N tl,,� hc`�;4 Y t� ., L .}E� t', +, ii,,, r�.1...„i, 't f, 1, . ' >: r P y �f,.n..Y Hlno 'e ? 4' ti '} 0 a, 4.1 \�! " .. 1! Ar, ,¢a �.� .,,if!1 # /y. �._obi P.j 1 V i ... ,y-'�• F.+ ..`.1 �±•t�l 1 r .\\�',�� R '.t sl•�ra� �� r r t3�` a \.�'� 'ri.[s + C�(� �/�iX.' ' iw�P [ l >a� '` ®• j. .f�l.I�l!_• . �• . y,J . E'. yam• a�..f.. 1,4%,.,,t," - iTAft•i•A.'*y1. .r:2 Lio Z.. .40A,t, i ''',L^` .1:f, t �S .w .•..t'•., • 1$,�,U a, ,\ .iC` '.. ..i„,141,.,... ''!! 11.211...„. }+/, • +41r! , a�, 1It/ s.'� ;.: 9Y!! ,,,,,,,,c,,,,,,,:‘,...,.:.,,,, -'.fl 44 pd- Ors.,*.YJ .�'"`�'+•',....4...L „... N. %I,'_' ♦ +_�1`.r'? �S,l �!'{' �'ser`.,' '‘-.1 ' d ; �rq,K, �t y,1 1� T; da tom, :` ; 1 L•. lei c !tQ�r ►. '1#2••• l ; :; �► � • v tiok� ' RSC Rw�l 4 {J rr L ,.' i (� J� ' s. ` /.l cis \`..�. l:N +('i •a• ► 1 IV' Mil.! r.1Iv, r4 Qv-„ y... �4': ,r P c ~I N. I�ir�r ' y�,., 1. :'t ..`.. S. •;h F .-:g a` , -•., • S j: ' ..%�y. A%4,. ,Yy,'`.t Qv- '..; , .fd. Q.; • • :-P... `1 '1 AI t;•tjt0, �-!� ' : . f 1--'fpM1�i;t�t `'i •?y.)) ^ �r : ' `t ►��,•s `;lly, 'WAY`- 's' '�'�`• t' -a ee'+�L ''+ .y t .� ! .x• ��t E'SJ:} L'�e, r i,. {'= ,,,;,,,,k`J� l� l `�tl ,' "j �3��. ..�Vi, . 4" -•- R`. V J ;'' �' -.rte �l. ►L�y�L: 1l � ' �- iii 11�..►r � +�C. kYa R "' •)t k 4; 4 �� i A j '_In* �Qa+ :� �, �1 :r $$+' .� "y '1..,,_ ' T:)k+` �! /-ANKr. �� . -':yrP i� �� . . ,F t` r..• . rpt""ty, lit, ., w c,' .44,4 •. f�.•' a /, „,./. s,„, t .• ";r. .+•n••,1, ((f•�l,►`t',`f ♦�/t�•q�.`�r 1 �,- wq s} ('t Y' i V, , �!"fa-''Ai .. 1 t .� - :� Ity'0�,,,,,.1 "i. 4* f i�:/h i? 44�a•l", I,e •r: . • I'4 [1iirrt.ray"1,,4r .'R,` 7 1 �� '`"'• 1\/'S . fi Y111111�i;;�1'19�ei��. s: T' y r Yiv1��t,Aid► � /j 6{ 'f''..- :'� 'Ma A}1-eh-j''t e�R,tp 71. , 7�yw•,�.' t+kr '1 •}l'l l� ►' ),J ,'' t 1�1.i..,�',�Yu .4 r ;�j:'! ry '.r{' ,�`.. \-k ',y .. :p,J s,+ .A/M►t► �. �', 1 4 !: 'n 41,.-,-'-n`. , �s. ,.: • / t I. ,.,k i•q '� ;t� R'a.'� ,�i �',C` .y5� `, \;iy.14.:a ltjry�y1.14,. .:1%.--4...;.••,'t t,}} I.,�=`p/� iir '° s , �A.3''. .t1 '� 1 es"�iry_ .;• =.�,�+��.ttt•O?aT•4�_ : i "'� A -'.'''...4.` e. t '}'.'.� Y C �1• .i� `i.♦` _• .V..'.'I .a4 �,aa. Y 4r.l.. r' `.%� J f(i,•.iL lit4`. ;ti Y �_�/�'' i?'.. � 't. ! ��+ts � ',`4 .Vt liR'.y '. r�iw•slfy' ^�91/% #,;p,\. ,.3.• �lJ`,, �`p•+t j#,r• 1 '. .1.1 r 1tr. \1 �' t` *{ti ;,�.• •f ,•te:� .-:.,'� r Fit 4 /. ' Af 1 ,IST w s; +,. ' %� ♦ \ I+Y"t s+M* ;e` ^=y, lvt' r-,,./.4 1 • ,1 F•�. I$ 3• ;r '�4 - 1.Yy {j��\..`• . * ;T, ice' ;t4 1 3; I, ,. •.,n,Pi.iiii ;. . ►}. 1. 1 . it`.., s .�1.1 • ; •• . • �� v .>" 4, d+� j ,..4:.:,,r..4'''h-- 1b• ,yJY: , " tP, .{-i'itk b ! f'Jv,„ ' .1%-ii-s.„11, 1% c' .1 .L�S�� u1: .c i•`"'f't �.141.4-v, !. 'I't ,+ 1',s1!, // , ",. •, r r�i .: /,'.l .y L:`} 1 ..1.1,,',� ' :.u•- • y`~1i 'Ir. sa !'"• `," �1,, w:i 1ts. t A.J l -re t/ r.49/".i"l Nye M..n.• f*� �` a Alt. .`�.b ;ti' i•��- �} i fili � ...,,,,;.4,,,,:,,,,4. '•. `�'E a ,.\ ,�,�.' •,• �.r' 11! ,i : ,� ,� •-4 �`x+; ''l •w .y: / � +.4 f'Ii:Y Ntl -4,-,„,„z4.-, . rte '',i12tier. . t•,,,` ) .1.. ,� .• • .4._,N.,.3 . , �a a!,•�•••,.., i C'� } +#i. +w 1• y ` + .>, j• .4,+/ P l',...".9. ,;:. /' ,.�y '' .f alQ>♦ (- ` r► ► •611'r 1:11 i S �:.L t,...,, 'S;j.• � t >�- , � /� `� ff . Erf ... t 7`�ti'+'d 4 -+� �• .Z ,_ ., _ l•y-. .. ' _. t^..•• �i. !'y -.. t1 ��'... • ..`'�Y� fe ,. ,4 ',. .- {.,1.•t..,-.4,"-i'" -:. .1 t, � ).'lig, .•1►ta- CC e'K 'sot'.+47 i Jl t ..s.a 3411 ' 1 `' o 4f Pt `�L.. } , ,i ��.-�, �. �!►• ((ab�t�^ :„ Lr1 Y t.:. l., y, >. r .� a o 7: �}' �,� ,� @i' ,.. l• / ilk •• - ,�.t!9r,�'�,.,� i,: '�„11 �� !wj#.. �'� ,.f ;}'� '1 r9�f'�\� !6.\f'' ! 7.1 ?,f f .'-�.;y` �' '��r `�,�"'J r•'Sr►i.,i_\\\? •u"..‘,431.....1-.-e:" s:r' .rdr' • 4•µ} ,•,•,,'u• , '• . 1 c j \,�-t'�i. ,�.^,l � P(..-,,,,,,<:,r .. ~•:..0 'e ..„----.y 4 i. - ` I. -... t.tri - ! ..., ' �syt�►�G 7`3;' 't t f•I"" -a jolikitvV '','",14" •J l:j'T.� � . , �_ •f.� i:, . F 1.N,,,•,;„2;,,,, ,7,•.,. . ,, ) '•'.�. :a,1 I. 1.+r", ,�� L,ly'Y1+4�a E.' Y�.l� , 'tl:. �r.-..:-. r lle+t'itia'• . t' �: .�� 1. �e ,, c �� • . �: �.� t • e J'Y 1 - � > i s .�> � ..3 "�` mss, -' , y r r. ,y ,r, ;"" y i ;{r: n yt e• "'r��yllj i�}r ,1p{•�.� y�7 ! t rl "( r�� - - 14�s J s154 t'' 1:r17- ,i ; 1j.t.. d5 � .ti� %�� „/r. y� `Y}�'',t ; iP'Afer . , !. 1,/ ' r _ .. f t...-.,..,,,,,,, • 'ti.,rw' t?,: 'a��,l ' �. l.r'-- .1 si, U �,,c�^• �� , A /''''''''141:1''''' �,!'�,►1a::� Y t � f'`�' is r 4')" "• `:;i #�--,�I�°I�;.�«w' �� • ._;��vitt,. i 4-J.`I ...�t4` C 'Yr4r r / r V �:,� 1 P. •>t,•� 11: ' s: .1' _ , R{ a �, � . «k tt l.a • y 1 5:..{ • •L• Yft . � '' O �• ar ` ,1'f' J •orf - ar. 1 �-( I- .. t l e, f.,- • ` r I'+� Q >fi' .;� 660 't LII '16'' ikfe!•1'f.' , =rjr ..._''.,...-,isi /'7//C��f:3. {�,7� 1w,',t. "i5.,". ti�w'.!.ct. . \9 e.� ' �-T1.': 11111 ,ri it i'Yiu{v. • f•''i�:11�'Ir� C.:�� l�i=1�?e w hhomoltEi (Joins inset A,sheet 12) n n -" - : ,",a UI.wardaate'plem.Land division corners.it shown,are appmu,nately positioned 122 _ SOIL SURVEY TABLE 13.$oil and Hydro- Flooding Soil name and logic map symbol group Frequency Duration Months a r r A Klickitat: _ 3 25E, 25F, 25G B None _ ` ----------------- Knappa: A 26 B None ----------------------- ------------- ______ 4 Labish: 27 D Frequent Very long Dec-Apr i Laurelwood: 28B, 28C, 28D, 28E, 29E, 29F B None McBee: 30 B Frequent Brief Nov-May Melbourne: 318, 31C, 31D, 31E, 31F B None Melby: 32C, 32D, 32E, 33E, 33F, 33G C None Olyic: 34C, 340, 34E, 35E, 35F, 35G B None Pervina: 36C, 36D, 36E, 36F C None w Quatama: 37A, 378, 37C, 37D C None Saum: 38B, 38C, 38D, 38E, 38F C None I J Tolke: 39E, 39F B None 1 Udifluvents: 40 B Frequent Very brief Nov-Apr -_ 1 Verboort: 42 D Frequent Brief Dec-Apr Wapato: 43 D Frequent Brief Dec-Apr Willamette: 44A, 448, 44C, 440 B None4 Woodburn: 45A, 45B, 45C, 45D C None 4 1 Xerochrepts: ' 46F: Xerochrepts part B None It Haploxerolls part C None 4 147D: Xerochrepts part D None Rock outcrop part. 'This mapping unit is made up of two or more dominant kinds of soil. See mapping unit description for the composition and behavior of the whole mapping unit. PPL Table 1. Runoff Curve Numbers for Urban Areas (SCS, 1986) Curve Number for Cover Description Hydrologic Soil Group Average Percent Cover Type and Hydrologic Condition Impervious Area A B C D Fully developed urban areas(vegetation established) Open space (lawns. parks. golf courses. cemeteries. etc.): Poor condition (grass cover < 50%) 68 79 86 89 Fair condition (grass cover 50°o to 75°0) 49 69 79 84 Good condition (grass cover < 75°0) 39 61 74 80 k poSi-DF_J. Impervious areas: � w(tiJ5 Paved parking lots. roots:driveways. etc. (excluding 98 98 98 98 right-of-wily k ? - - 4 OST. 060. Streets and roads: 1144Pe-L)IOJS Payed: curbs and storm sewers (excluding. 98 98 98 98 right-ot=way) PaNed: open ditches (including right-ofway) 83 89 92 93 Gravel (including right-of-way) 76 85 89 91 Dirt (including right-of-way) 72 82 87 89 Western desert urban areas: Natural desert landscaping (pervious areas only) 63 77 85 88 .Artificial desert landscaping (impervious weed barrier. desert shrub with I- to 2-inch sand or _gravel mulch and 96 96 96 96 basin border.( Urban districts: Commercrai and husiness 85 89 92 94 95 Industrial 81 88 91 93 Residential districts lot size: I acre or less (toy.n houses) 65 77 85 90 92 14 acre 38 61 75 83 87 1 3 acre 30 57 72 81 86 _ acre -- 54 70 80 8= i .:ere 20 51 68 79 84 2 acres 12 46 65 77 82 Dcrciooput uri-an areas \ev.lgraded areas (pervious areas onl . no vegetation) 77 86 91 94 Idle lands (CNs are determined using coyer types similar to those in Table 2) J-3 S 945007gip Tui:Q%OU Handboukapp1-2.393 Table 2 — Runoff Curve Numbers for Other Agricultural Lands' ' ';, • Curve numbers for Cover description hydrologic soil group— Hydrologic Cover type condition A B C D Pasture. grassland. or range—continuous Poor 68 79 86 89 forage for grazing) Fair 49 69 79 84 Good 39 61 74 80 Meadow—continuous grass. protected from — 30 58 71 78 grazing and generally mowed for hay. PQE - DSO. 07- FEkeoloo6 Brush—brush-weed-grass mixture with brush Poor 48 67 77 83 the major element) Fair 35 56 70 77 Good 430 48 65 73 Woods—grass combination (orchard -Poor 57 73 82 86 or tree farm).5 Fair 43 65 76 82 Good 32 5S 72 79 Woods.6 Poor 45 66 77 83 Fair 36 60 73 79 Good 430 55 70 770 Farmsteads—buildings, lanes, driveways. — 59 74 82 86 and surrounding lots. 'Average runoff condition. and 1. = 0.2S. 'Pour: <50‘7( ground cover or heavily grazed with nu mulch. Fair: 50 to 73`7; ground cover and not heavily grazed. Gaud: >737., ground cover and lightly or•univ uccaaionally grazed. ,Poor: <50":7 ground cover. Purr:: 50 to 73'7; 'round cover. Guux >75q ground cover. 'Actual curve number is less than 30: use CN = 30 for runoff computation:. 'CN's snt.mn were computed fur areas kith 5u',i toow- awl 50K grays(pasture) cover. Other cumbinauon$ of conditions may be wmputeri Crum the CV, for «uuri- and pasture. /'uo, Furest Utter. ,mali trees. awl brv�h are destruced by heavy grazing or regular bw,',^e. Fur, Woods are grazed but pat tjunuu. and some forest litter covers the soil. (,:,,,,i '\'auris are Irrutecteri Crum grazing. and iit:er and brush adequately cover the soii. III 945OO7NB'HANDBOOR'•APP•G 002 08 3I 94 J-4 3 2. b. The Design Storm 1) Return frequency and duration specify the design storm event. The design storms shall be based on two parameters: a) Total rainfall (depth in inches). b) Rainfall distribution (dimensionless). c. Design Storm Distribution 1) The rainfall distribution to be used within the Agency is the design storm of 24-hour duration based on the standard NRCS Type lA rainfall distribution using the chart on the following page. The total depth of rainfall for storms of 24-hour duration and 2, 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100 year recurrence are 2.50, 3.10, 3.45, 3.90, 4.20, 4.50 inches respectively. Recurrence Interval Total Precipitation (years) - Depth (in) 2 2.50 5 3.10 10 3.45 25 3.90 50 4.20 100 4.50 Hydrology and Hydraulics Appendix- Page-3- C— 0 a NORTH cam " «. t ,z, ,� fP s."P �� (NOT TO SCALE) . 2 ge. ° r _ . r \li 0 lii. a7 WASHINGTON COUNTY 4D 0 r ®d Al• Lill SITE VICINITY MAP R TIGARD FIGURE �(�/ O TIGARD, OREGON 1 FEBRUARY 2003 N 5799FIG ■ ,4' 0 I o.•,a o . ■ • •s w.. .a.� i, e w ■ . NORTH '� �,, A�V� , �z'-----.,- �� \� \ \�0 \ \� \ (NOT TO SCALE) lig c\� O 6v.11 h e ,, �;,, \�\ 1 L , :''''-----0-i ,(•/.. ._71/246........7,4,-/4' :,...'''',44,''',..,74,1:1,i',.:-::::::,,,;,:22-7:4,_ I „, :':,,,,,,:,N<„,z,,,,,,,,,:,,,ir.,,, .1 / z ,'. 4-440-, , : ,-A, • ..... Nip .. 4orlilf: f,1 IP / I ...." , , • . I, , • „,-,4. ,,,. ,...,,... , , ci e Ay e ? ,, ..,/ AtIV i * . 7/ 1 r ♦♦ ♦♦ IAI ♦• rAtli / . II ..). -3N - 111 at fit, air --4,.. : . n II A. ALI _ \ /II qAlrAT. AI PROPOSED SITE PLAN QUICKLUBE TIGARD FIGURE p TIGARD, OREGON 2 �a FEBRUARY 2003 5799F16 �14: Nt} �� w : t NORTH i "V/1 s �" .„,....",„„.„:2...,44 * t vt° >v (NOT TO SCALE) ;S" ;i ,-' -:,-„, ' .., ,t4;44,„is 4.t:Ci.'if,1 _ ,._,4,,r.„!.:L, 4.4014' ''',,,, Va„..'4t'''.4:t1 / w k a ,, ,, --,,„f2„4,111,::-.7„7.4! „,,,,,,,t„,..,,,t, ,„[ F Y .s N.:\ ; P ^d.....4” �� ki 1,^'I 4 ':'....''''L'"'-4.' 4111t.' ,. / p ' 14 3 �/ f f�#4 N44 xg x ,y r ti L t...."',., i - "- rt,. #ms .' Pab ts,'c 1"^34 ,- @ b k Ak r —. - ,., * y -.' f � t' � P � � � -.r � 1 x My � # ° _ 33; o` �r 3 , ° +iM` '�, '�, $ . b ` "'� *: Ar ' ,::74114:171,4. r fir ; 0 "` ... '` F' � � T a l�, - _ � w � ,r\ e d.. i° rte, ,4 r �' • iY= k i W :',1 ,"::fM x` .,,"k✓"�+ ' 4 d ,.-r. "b ,.SCJ � A. "�`'.... 5�:....:` .a.. .. '�� ''y I LEGEND LANE CONFIGURATIONS • STOP SIGN AND TRAFFI C CONTOL DEVICES - TRAFFIC SIGNAL D 3 IX QUICKLUBE TIGARD FIGURE — TIGARD. OREGON FEBRUARY 2003 5799FIG Quicklube Tigard Development—Tigard, Oregon Project#:5799 February 12, 2003 Page:6 Public Transit Service and Facilities Public Transit service is provided by TriMet. TriMet operates two bus lines along Highway 99W, the Route 12, Barbur Boulevard and Route 95, Tigard-1-5 Express, both with stops within 500 feet of the proposed site. Route 12 offers roundtrip service between Sherwood and Downtown Portland throughout the entire day, seven days a week. Route 12 runs at approximately 15-minute headways during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours, and approximately 20-minute headways on the weekends. The 95X is a commuter bus that offers weekday-only service to Downtown Portland between 6 and 8 a.m. and return service to Sherwood from 3:30 to 6:30 p.m. Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities and Activity Field observations in the study area revealed pedestrian activity primarily associated with the nearby bus stops. In addition, one bicyclist was observed during the field visit. Sidewalks and bike lanes are provided on both sides of Highway 99W (Pacific Highway) in the immediate site vicinity. An asphalt sidewalk currently exists along the existing antique shop site, which shall be reconstructed upon development of the proposed Quicklube. New sidewalks are provided on the eastside of Highway 99W opposite the proposed site. Existing Traffic Volumes and Peak Hour Operations Manual turning movement counts were obtained at the unsignalized intersection of Highway 99W with the existing access easement to the study site, and also at the signalized Highway 99W/Tigard Marketplace intersection. These counts were collected on a mid-week day in January of 2003 during both the weekday morning (7:00 a.m. —9:00 a.m.) and evening (4:00 p.m. - 6:00 p.m.)peak periods. Based on the peak period count data, the weekday a.m. peak hour was found to occur between 7:30 and 8:30 a.m., the p.m. peak hour was found to occur between 5:00 and 6:00 p.m. Appendix "A" contains the traffic count data sheets used in this study. Current Levels of Service All level of service analyses described in this report were performed in accordance with the procedures stated in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (Reference 2) and 1999 Oregon Highway Plan (OHP) and associated Amendment to the 1999 OHP, Alternative Highway Mobility Standards, Metro Area (Reference 3). ODOT evaluates the performance of an intersection based on the volume-to-capacity criteria outlined in the OHP. The ODOT standard for intersections along Highway 99W (Pacific Highway) is that they operate with a peak hour volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio of 0.99 or less. A more detailed description of level of service and the criteria by which it is determined is presented in Appendix "B." Appendix "B" also indicates how level of service is measured and what is generally considered the acceptable range for level of service. Figures 4 and 5 summarize the operational results for the two study intersections during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours, respectively. The results presented in the two figures indicate that both intersections are currently operating within ODOT acceptable volume-to-capacity thresholds during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Appendix "C" includes the year 2003 existing conditions level of service worksheets. Kittelson &Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon 4,,,f- ^¢ .,,,,l.:1-2.4;4-77- 72;14:,--:,;,,51:*,*,. :..,.-... „.__,,_ 5�."r "�i4, gj g °dy _ � tli°-�c.,"� ...-4—'*' �e�*s' Y'�.' ��{s +' NORTH '-,5',.., th�� a �-.1-....,,,-.1, ` ,t Y _ ;' .z . b':4-l'f (NOT TO SCALE) i'll LOS=A res �.,{ 3 ,.,�9t -1.1.,4',:. "Y � �` * � ; , a a ' zI Del=7.4 k :• -- 4r +'. <' R V/C=0.62 t �" ` a VPS �� .�ab L;;; K x .� $•)!'/4� z*;' vtv" - z4,4:,,..,::::,?.. �. ^�' ..:;:k: ° _ '`�° �� 5*: aux l r tSy, ' no- z+ r. . ; ww � y.t at` ,r :�"',. r'' CM=EBLT� ,.;0. u,» "w` A.. q. 1 DeI 10.1 :•,..l,'4'..;)1;'-'1-- ' 2 , ` 7,- ,x LOS=B • R V/C=0.01 P ° E �; J 4'`)I d 5 °, a '''' �P �.. N kg,,'{,nh ro{.d , -'`f '�.Y 4 ' ,y�•Y,yF 3 � �v fie .°' �,.` � �` `" ° a " '�'#�' 2�,r, ` v #fit •& ``* ka . r Mr " swF . 'V. • it �� — • t k <::.71,:',"1":;;.i.;:'• h h✓. x`q zJ �, •,,,,:.„1,,,,-, 'fit �};sa"✓`. tipw ni ^nn s- A. gam. _ �° .:.,;.:7•414,.....,%,,,,4,,,,..':-� ,L,' '•:..,....,,. �. {*` � e ...5,,•. q;n A e ak� � Y�� Y' µ , • " ii,„ ,,„,„,. „, .. • „,, ii is r,i a4 ,r}.: 'f-y +. . -,7 ' • 4107'.., . �t Y *'� a '�^ y a. , a '�' r 51 k4 P,�,ts '"$i lw.+ ,v. ”« � � i `•a ",. mn. ri... C S=CRITICAL MOVEMENT(UNSIGNALIED) 2003 EXI STING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS LOS=INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE(SIGNALIZED)/ WEEKDA Y AM PEAK HOUR CRITICAL MOVEMENT LEVEL Or"SERVICE 4 (UNSIGNALIZED) Del=INTERSECTION AVERAGE DELAY(SIGNALIZED)/ QUICKLUBE TIGARD FIGURE K CRITICAL MOVEMENT DELAY(UNSIGNALIZED) TIGARD, OREGON V/C=CRITICAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO FEBRUARY 2003 579- -cm= 79 ,FIG r t '4' lf,,,,,,4. ' '4,;(1mA'''''''''''V,16, ' ' I: ' 7'-':,1'Ll''''''''4--' a� n _ NORTH c0 °� ' ca' ° > vg ti �" ,-,4-44?„ (NOT TO SCALE) S�� ' r/te° w ` :'(';,.•,#,:::i.; kr s 'z& �yy', k S LOS=A�i .' i `? A {' ice"` %'„ t, f t1 V/C=0.59 , 4. i -` - ::-- t ��.x �} YF ; '$W. mks . r �,f77 % '4.7,~ 4 «-.X, .d 'CL.A;; k V �,� ..11..';' � .� .di,�+} a: r k 44' 1:: cs CM=SBLT� r. 1k`' � ,x' � :' 141::::'•:5:1/ i � LOS=F l x•4,,,,-* .�' `+, ,S` - �`# ,�. Del=>50 • `• r � 3747 , 1 et � ' a `„ R �, ,�^+,, g»} —0.03 tet . Z °(w'E� � k{ ,p�6a� � k• ' -.,*i r: `F s..x'+r ft` ,. :2:1 '" a��• r 'r - 1 Z. P`�p' ti j ' w t €:r w q ., � i $ a sa # a.e' + ,„,-4,F / ar ..; •4-. ' r ac rk`f -ss .q fit d ,{ � at t -" •s` d Y _ 3'S,.9 ° d t L� • a I" ,,''set i Ip (' °` : ;'+w ,,,,,,,:.•_:,l'eta RR".. *"�aE :. - ' 74...i44:-- :..-''..,, 4.4 .. t,,,,, .. ,,,, ,,,7- T4.i - a .�dh 'raa' t uk`' [��...i. __ x: z' LEGEND CM=CRITICAL MOVEMENT(UNSIGNALIZED) 2003 EXI STI NC TRAFFIC CONDI TIONS LOS=INTERSECTION LEVELCRITICAL MOVEMENT O F SERVICE QUICKLUBE TIGARD VEL OF SERVCNALIZED),J WEEKDA Y PI1/I PEAK HOUR (UNSIGNALIZED) TIGARD, OREGON Del=INTERSECTION AVERAGE DELAY(SIGNALIZED); FIGURE 7 CRITICAL MOVEMENT DELAY(UNSIGNALIZED) C V/C=CRITICAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO FEBRUARY 2003 J IX 5799F IG vuictituue t tgutu Lievetuptttent — t tgutu, February 12, 2003 Page: 9 Traffic Safety The crash history of the segment of Highway 99W near the proposed site between SW Park Street and SW Watkins Avenue was reviewed in an effort to identify existing or potential future safety issues. Crash records were obtained from the Oregon Department of Transportation for the five-year period between January 1, 1997 and December 31, 2001, the most recent five years on record. The crash history for the study area is summarized in Table 3, including crash severity and type. Table 3 1997 - 2001 Intersection Crash Data Accident Type Severity Side Rear Turning Intersection Swipe End Angle Movement Other PDO* Injury Total Highway 99W/ 0 3 0 3 0 4 2 6 Easement Access Highway 99W/ 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 3 Tigard Marketplace *=Property Damage Only The ODOT historical crash data for this corridor of Highway 99W, revealed that the average crash rate over the five-year period, which is expressed in terms of the number of crashes per million vehicle miles (MVM), is approximately 3.7 crashes per MVM. This is higher than the statewide average of 3.3 for similar facilities between 1997 and 2001. Based on the information provided in Table 3 above, the majority of crashes near the easement were property damage only. When the proposed site access easement and the signalized intersection at Tigard Marketplace was investigated for crash history, only nine of the crashes along this corridor appear to have occurred near these intersections. :.a Only two of the nine reported crashes at these intersections have occurred since 1998. Two-thirds of all crashes were of the rear-end type. Recent roadway improvements along Highway 99W such as the raised median on Highway 99W to channelize movements were designed and constructed by ODOT in 2001 and 2002 may improve the safety of the corridor. In any case, it is expected that the proposed project will not have any adverse effect on traffic safety in the area, and may actually have some beneficial effect. Access driveways along Highway 99W at the existing Antique shop are proposed to be removed and access will be consolidated to the existing easement driveway. As a result, the access to the proposed development through the easement will be located farther away from the signalized Highway 99W/Tigard Marketplace intersection. The study area crash history does not identify any other patterns or trends that would suggest inherent safety deficiencies at these two study intersections. Appendix "D" contains the crash data used in this study. •i. Kittelson &Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon vutcn.tuoe t tgara uevetopment— I igara, uregon t l UJ (L t. J/77 February 12, 2003 Page: 10 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS The impacts of the proposed Quicklube development on the surrounding transportation system were analyzed as described below. • Year 2004 background growth and in-process developments were reviewed and analyzed. • The proposed development plan was reviewed. • The total number of future daily, weekday a.m. and weekday p.m. peak hour site- generated trips were estimated for full build-out of the proposed development. • The new site-generated trips were assigned to the study area roadways and intersections based upon an estimated trip distribution pattern. This distribution of site-generated trips onto the surrounding transportation system was based upon a review of existing weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour volumes, and existing land use patterns within the study area and in the region. • Predicted site-generated traffic from the proposed Quicklube site was added to the predicted future year volumes to evaluate the year 2004 weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour total traffic operations. • Level-of-service was evaluated at the proposed site access easement. • A compliance analysis with Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) 734-051-000 (Division 51) standards was conducted for the proposed site-access driveways on Highway 213. • On-site circulation was evaluated at the proposed site plan with respect to its ability to accommodate truck movements and internal traffic circulation. The methodology summarized above and the results of the analysis are presented in detail in the remainder of this report. Year 2004 Total Traffic Conditions The total traffic conditions analysis forecasts how the study area's transportation system, and specifically the site driveways, will operate following development of the proposed site. This analysis includes traffic growth due to other development within the study area and from general growth in the region. Planned Developments and Transportation Improvements As part of this analysis, Kittelson & Associates, Inc. attempted to obtain information about other planned developments and transportation improvements within the site vicinity from City of Tigard and ODOT staff. The City of Tigard did not identify any in-process developments to be included in the 2004 future analysis beyond those accounted for by general background growth. Discussions with ODOT revealed that there are no planned roadway improvements to be included in the total traffic conditions analysis within the study area. Consequently, no adjustments were made to the background traffic volumes to account for the effects of planned developments or nearby transportation improvements. Kittelson &Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon Quicklube I igara Development— I rgara, Uregon riu,/ecirr. .1 Y' February 12, 2003 Page: I1 Traffic Volumes Year 2004 background traffic volumes were developed to account for the anticipated natural growth in background traffic volumes within the study area. An annual growth rate of two percent was applied to the existing 2002 traffic volumes to account for near-term regional growth in the area. This growth projection was determined based on ODOT historic traffic count data from the years 1997 to 2000, which showed the average annual growth to be approximately two percent. Proposed Development Plan The proposed Quicklube development is planned to be constructed on the site of the existing antique shop with access provided at the existing easement located approximately 155 feet south of the Highway 99W/Tigard Marketplace intersection. A second phase development of the remaining 0.40 acres of vacant land behind the proposed Quicklube is planned as a single-stall car wash and small auto detail shop. The second phase car wash and detail shop was included in this analysis, even though it may actually be built at a later date. The Quicklube development, along with the future car wash, is proposing a single access point via the existing easement onto Highway 99W at milepost 10.05. For the purposes of the analysis, full build-out of the development was assumed to occur in the year 2004. Trip Generation Estimates of the total number of future daily, weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour vehicle trip ends for the site's proposed land uses were developed based on empirical observations made at existing facilities similar to those proposed. These observations are summarized in the standard reference manual, Trip Generation, 6th Edition (Reference 2), published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Table 4 summarizes the estimated trip generation characteristics for the proposed development on a typical weekday and during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour. All trip values shown in Table 4 have been rounded to the nearest five trips. Table 4 Trip Generation Estimate Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour ITE Daily Land Use Code Size Trips Total In Out Total In Out Quick Lubrication3 Servicing 837 120 10 5 5 15 10 5 Vehicle Shop Positions Automobile Care 840 1,200 sq.ft. 25* 5 <5 <5 5 <5 <5 Center Self Service Car 847 1 Wash Stall 100 5 <5 <5 5 <5 <5 Wash 'r Gross Trips 245 20 10 10 25 15 10 Pass-By(15%) 35 5 <5 <5 5 <5 <5 Internalization (10%) 20 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 Net New Trips 190 15 10 5 20 10 10 sq.ft. = square-feet gross floor area = San Diego Traffic Generators, January 1990, SANDAG Kittelson &Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon Qutcktuoe 1 cgara Development—i igara, Dragon , ,,,it-,.W. February 12, 2003 Page: 12 As shown in Table 4, the proposed development is expected to generate approximately 190 total net new daily trips, of which 15 trips (10 inbound, 5 outbound) and 20 trips (10 inbound, 10 outbound) will occur during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours, respectively. Trip Distribution and Assignment The distribution of site-generated trips onto the surrounding transportation system was determined through an examination of the existing traffic volumes, the ease of turning movements to and from the proposed site based on the existing street system, and land uses within the study area. The estimated trip distribution pattern is illustrated in Figure 6. As shown in Figure 6, approximately 70- percent of the new trips generated by the site are expected to come from the south along Highway 99W (Pacific Highway) and approximately 30-percent of the new trips generated by the site are expected to come from the north. Figures 7 and 8 show the assignment of the new weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour site-generated trips onto the study roadways based on the estimated trip distribution pattern, respectively. Total Traffic Volumes and Peak Hour Levels-of-Service A description of level-of-service and the criteria by which they are determined is presented in Appendix "B." Appendix "B" also indicates how level-of-service is measured and what is generally considered the acceptable range of level-of-service. As mentioned previously, an annual growth rate of 2.0 percent was estimated based on the five year average of the historic data from ODOT permanent count recorders near the site and applied to the year 2003 existing traffic volumes (shown in Appendix "C"). The weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour site-generated traffic volumes (shown in Figures 7 and 8) were added to the year 2002 existing traffic volumes (shown in Figures 4 and 5) to arrive at the year 2004 total a.m. and p.m. peak traffic volumes shown in Figures 9 and 10, respectively. All traffic volumes in Figures 9 and 10 have been rounded to the nearest five vehicles per hour. `t Figures 9 and 10 also identify the forecast year 2004 intersection and/or approach levels-of-service and v/c ratios during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour at the study intersections. As shown in Figures 9 and 10, the Highway 99W/site access easement and Highway 99W/Tigard Marketplace intersections both operate acceptably during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour. Appendix "E" contains the 2004 total traffic conditions level-of-service worksheets Kittelson &Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon fli ` s, §�4 £ td--- '::':::,:e Y �g g'L, ,T x% `s.,.. n Y f' ' "sk s„a NORTH �* �� „; (NOT TO SCALE) . ,.:—...,.::----'.+0.,'..--,-, a n . as ,i 7 '"‘ 0 a ll: - .•';. ...-•-..,. .•:..i.;,..1—...,74;,...?... -7,"., • r ;4::-.:,-_--z e°" .,� � � �`�'�ro* V-•'y�'�*' `� � ,�, � `4.' N. .�`!'.;./:is � ' --` ./.:-. '3tt .4-'''-'".'!„‘„,.. -,;#",,,;;;_i a x a e,;e`�'sw' ,' x+_.,r.' —,--:-=',-:,- c�.,, 'J`,4 4 r`` 11 r^- E'V;4 m" .WR a '...,4.��".-•.:;---, 1. ,-t.",' s ' a'tom'.' x -,„21.' ��' : , '+C p. a e,; V' �' .!..,!''',?-1,''','''',_,;'-.:.;',-..;-.::,',!'* '*s - x --041 44 z, '"' ` � t r« I*: ' ,'- : ,. wx��t 'I a7.«" i�i.e=.a+vw i ':.-„:;.k.4,4,;-,,:,,-., #:. .w ..1;--!=''''''-'1;_!, <a e f h' ' a.- ew g -.�,,, «„ �r .7 ,,,, <a �' "•.;-',''',x` .wye V.V t fir: ' $ "' y C e t.y u= ;....4!..i.:,,.-0.' may, S 7 ° :.. «°+may � a d e-i. .t c' � � _ a w �� i - : ; 2 t * :,1.,,,,..-.,:v: Lit: S@ d .-s; z ' rim t .-1:--` ...a`. ... -4° b ' . 'x A Ahi, ' y air, w 3£ „„e" 'F x. . Y s. d ,05—'4,,, „:"--< xa/4 v„:;;,-1,,,,,:,,,''''W:'..,, :' '^..y, y�g 1 ... , . , , . ,...... .. ..„ § a+ 4 . .„„.. . ..., ...„,..,,,....„.,,,,, .„ ...„..,.... ;, .... Y. , ... ..,. ,......,... .. ,.. ....... , .. .... . . . 1 . „..„,,,,. .,..t. _11 F ,k I � �f° � ' TFC w 1 4. , _ f �� a� T $ +r. 1 r �$ `_,,.`b ,- 'aM p Oka. i ,�..., 4` 'r 2,;.:: .w ''' li.o, 'y ✓' n h�� la' 4!-,,.---:,_.- �”�, �'k t R.dery .'�... _w;',.,•-'-.-:' idlAr ESTIMATED TRIP DISTRIBUTION IXN QUICKLUBE TIGARD FIGURE TIGARD, OREGON G+ - FEBRUARY 2003 V 5799FIG d '''''''''"'' ''''r''''''''';4:.--: ".t rpt @"' . i' NORTH 3 „`....:,-.•,',. ..-.;:„.'::::',-- � ` , (NOT TO SCALE) 0 ,-..',',14'.1..„i':41..t- ,t`-'71.i.',1-.. i. ! ', :r„... . .• - -„,-;-...'4f—r1.144';4:'''.'''',:„:::,..:-, •.\...'::1-..Lik,";.',..-—:',:,;.4':':-';''''ir''-: ' eo / y.:„.,.4,:dvp..,,r,..7:::::?.....v... ...:;4. '.i ,lf•'7;;;;,:....4;.' :',' ''-..y.,..•,'.`....- , .” . ,:'--). v T.dtrp'"s�T'MS %j l i d s °'a 1 ,V _ e- $v�y,4:i.:F .1:4r -kms^: / ,. " , :, aha. 3_- ....., � /L, �« 3. F 4 y `.5,1 ,F r sx iv.Y. A - '' i '' s `•a 'iia - F k _ .y� l''':''' ` .94 Y^ m Y' M1 3t ,yhy `► f� .fit ,., `.;� �s t , • 7..0 ." .tp• y.2 fi ¢ yLL� *'�:flop.,t .dS�.`�. R e R R • 4 �4i J ✓X41 k f, 1. ., y�({3 ,fir {.- r ' r - «� . .<«_ X b [t NI fit" �,, "9 w =fig, , *" t '' y ,, n, '•d ...• °° a, i p"1, +f` ;, cwt^ - �' 4a Y '$ Y <f `` `M1t 1 F , -, . ,,,,,,,.,t: �f� a' iti ,• i" ` OMryp ::.... ,,, , , •. . ,„:....4„,,,,,„. . ;. :„.:,.. ....:,,,; , ,......., „.;,,•,01'. , ‘ , ' .,e.i.,;,9;,,,i,,,,,,,,..,... s k ., ` h ,-, rA rR ,...,. ..„ ::: _,. : •,„,. ..... .i....,„:,..:„. ,....., ....,..4,:,.;,...,.•:::.0,2: *. - .' - •'' ...-'- -'iiip,,,,,,4440termr----.0-0.,:' 40" „. ` Nt ,Eba .w. SITE—GENERATED TRAFFIC WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR QUICKLUBE TIGARD FIGURE 7, TIGD, ■ FEBRUARYAROREGON 2003 5799FIG(YXE:WS5799) � , .ten _ N �a, 0 .,:f.,:,..::: W n ?" , NORTH � � ..1'..:...::',"-.1-^' : s r �,- � � � � �x2' 4 :..„..„1-c:, (NOT TO SCALE) E r4.;,-,": tii. yg^.ER `' �)e ++ted -:- ,..i....,„...„.,..,.....,,,-, -;„1-73-,.:11,77f!..::, u \--", ,...,4; - \k. `..!,-,*•,•:. 4 erna`p yts r i y� r "�y"., ." _.,_ � -,-..i:,.:N �+l��tl� . i'� d^��.. i r, p4e. .iy ra _ �.".' y`¢ 's^ t's .' = h °' _X91 " '""4 . ,,,,I, ,., ,...i.,pk,..,7%."-, ,,.., ' ..6";:,. - ••';', '•••'''', ;-",,:::t f Y N.'t• x �s -Fd s -.:,,,:.,::' -tt: . t.', 44,,.'=, t..'Nc -.., ' - -,,, f .1 .. , ..r - . .. ''` Kau .4 �N. � w C t };,F si c tM ( a `` a '*' ...,*--i=:4'''''''.....-• Y'T x x w , r �pg r }r 3'd Caw,` '�. , . _.,. . , ., .,..,, ,„, .,„ ,� dye ^4 {'`1'' +, + :- I- r , _. . ....,,,,..., ,...,.„ :„ ..,, ... ., . .. .. , . ., ..f..,,.... .. .. ,_,,,, .,... . ., . . , ... , ,,..,„..„,,,..,,.. , '� ''�y Y 7"y'F`t' az4`'i .e r .s .\ . j yy x I - "x^ .b r 3r , rs g _ ` `S _Li . . r 1 r r AVi tr a 'b l 4 ^s .{.'. a y 1 E�i..Yp a, _ .,,,.1-.4-; .A w qt n i, � ��' fir:, f � i5 -ti' '...;"A'.,."."..4.,.,, ';',-rtqyx ->e K, -"'••• SI TENAD TRFI C WEEKDAY-GEERPM PEAKKT RHA OF UR QUICKLUBE TIGARD FIGURE 14 TIGARD, OREGON �(` FEBRUARY 2003 •� 5799FIG(YXE:WS5799) iii a � n r a � * z NORTH , 0 .., - -' wr (NOT TO: SCALE) Sd a��5 "° `: � 4:...t.. ....",.7..,-,1:-4..- a v e `" e r sfp, ,,. S, `� f/ 0hp � i. ` mac ,i 6-Y, 6 ..fit g, .f.-,'.1.'''1., .''i "'d"., g ^'vt� )•"+�, 4,:d' £- LOS=A ''*'t ` �,,. Del=7.6 ¢ x• f F 4 �/V/C=0.64 " • ?•m �� as tsa a r; �• CM=SBLT <, / e ,14‘7,,, LOS=F DeI=>50 t�ir , g • "a ,it V/C=0.05 -., i O _ • ti I ;•wi.' aR' f - �,e { , iTtl _ ,ra «1,,' + c ``„j a � a. �.' s ra Fp g is"E d � ! t' 'T ,� 'ate m ' . t !,17,14. 5 ;q �y +K k i , s'�• xY •� KK4 fx alk i4rf .} �t .g • u" .. K ' H .r W w ¢.t,'"�' N.,', .:',144K.:":,.... ar' : '' 4,.....,': ;,...,.:, � r , :. a: ; Gm p�.' ;;..t � 1 I I_FC,FNn CM=CRITICAL MOVEMENT(UNSIGNALIZED) 2004 TOTAL TRAFFIC CONDITIONS LOS=INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE(SIGNALIZED)/ WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR CRITICAL MOVEMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE (UNSIGNALIZED) FIGURE Del=INTERSECTION AVERAGE DELAY(SIGNALIZED)/ QUICKLUBE TIGARD CRITICAL MOVEMENT DELAY(UNSIGNALIZED) TIGARD, OREGON _� Ill< V/C=CRITICAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO FEBRUARY 2003 5799FIG(YXE:WS5799) , . ' `,i7.-.'-..f.:. '''‘,#;:,-,."4'....,46,,,.''''f';'''‘-'-'.4,.. a ic ` . x. -t-H,„ ; NORTH + r w (NOT TO SCALE)A L E rb )p : r �5 u. r w P "�0 - ''',4•-,-..:;'.N.';-;.,41 ;,!"%-- - +fr4,. 1.. ' 1 rt - y . .1,,...,0i-,./.L..7. '� �y . , .k 1., _ ti S O 'z. ' 4 ; = . ..7•,,,--,...;.•.:•1-;!,4-111--p - rS�`J► f�/'(bSLOS=A +I �� sDel=7.9 V/C=0.61 t • a `` ar .a° '� , c7'' ". "b.ri/CO {zsY� + a CM=SBLT • / /- LOSrF • . 'ii`'4 Fh , : , s 'r Del=>50 T 1 V/C=0.24 .;;;r:‘‘'' �s O x A /� # t5 cy ctwlC Nrb :LI, -"f CZ :.ope P.:,-1,' ?...A;:fit '"— 1 ' • ''',.'' . ..... :' ' ./ -.!, . ,.'7° ; p# 7.;'..41 Illt • 2 ..F.7 * '''i,.: .. l'::' e F l n .. " + a. • ',-... • , 0:, '-...', ,-.-..., ;..; • • 1. f y i. • v� ,,.. r 9 +Frn r ¢ `�P W • _..fe '&:.: a ,fi.R r# A' "n+gr4 yv , a s tw.,'.',...,„••,,,.....,,,,,..:.:,.%,,,,i.,',:'.- 4: e,2 . ♦ M � LEGEND CM=CRITICAL MOVEMENT(UNSIGNALIZED) 2004 TOTAL TRAFFIC CONDI TIONS LOS=INTERSECTION LEVEL CRITICAL MOVEMENT O VEL OF SERVICE WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR (UNSIGNALIZED) Dei=INTERSECTION AVERAGE DELAY(SIGNALIZED)/ QUICKLUBE TIGARD FIGURE ,Z CRITICAL MOVEMENT DELAY(UNSIGNALIZED) TIGARD, OREGON -f K� V/C=CRITICAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO FEBRUARY 2003 ( ��.LLL»>�� 5799rIG(YXE:W55799) Quicklube Tigard Development-Tigard, Oregon Projectif:J/yypage: 18 February 12, 2003 Sight Distance Evaluation Intersection sight distance at each of the proposed site-access driveways was reviewed to ensure adequate sight distance would be available under full build-out conditions. According to the 1994 edition of A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (Reference 3), required intersection sight distance is computed based upon the performance characteristics of the design vehicle and the travel speed along the subject roadway. For the purposes of this analysis, the design vehicle was assumed to be a passenger car (P). The posted speed along Highway 99W (Pacific Highway) in the site vicinity is 35 mph. ODOT has a sight distance methodology (May 1, 2000) based on the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials' (AASHTO) 7- i second gap standard methodology(see Appendix "F'). The resulting intersection sight distances, based on the 35 mph posted speed limit, are shown in Table 5 for Highway 99W (Pacific Highway) near the site. .I Table 5 Intersection Sight Distance Analysis Results Sight Distance Required Sight Distance Available (feet) (feet) Adequate Sight Site-Access Driveway To Lett To Right To Left To Right Distance? Proposed Easement 360 360 >400 >400 Yes Access to Highway 99W In order to maintain adequate sight distance in either direction, the landscaping improvements associated with this development, such as shrubs and low growing ground cover along the Highway 99W site frontage, should be regularly trimmed and maintained. Queuing/Stacking Distance Evaluation A queuing analysis was conducted at the ingress from Highway 99W existing easement to ensure that adequate on-site storage will be available for vehicles without spilling back into through traffic on Highway 99W. Using the forecast total traffic volumes shown in Figure 10, the 95` percentile queues for each of the site access driveways under both scenarios were estimated. One vehicle was assumed to occupy 25 feet. Table 6 summarizes the results of the queuing analysis. Table 6 Queuing/Stacking Distance Analysis Results 95th-Percentile Queue Queue Storage Available Adequate Storage Required (feet) (feet) Stacking Location EB Lett EB Lett Distance? Highway 99W/Existing 25 60 Yes Easement '-i — - Portland, Oregon Kittelson &Associates, Inc. Quicktube 1 igara uevelopment- I igara, uregon February 12, 2003 Page: 19 As shown in Table 6, the queuing analysis determined that the forecast 95`x-percentile queues associated with site build-out can be accommodated within each approach at all of the study intersections without encroaching into the upstream intersection, indicating that the forecast queues can be accommodated within the existing roadway design. Appendix "G" contains the queuing 1 analyses worksheets for the total traffic conditions. TIGARD QUICKLUBE - COMPLIANCE WITH DIVISION 51 As described previously, a single site access is being proposed via the existing Highway 99W easement at milepost 10.05. The proposed access design for this project calls for two existing ` driveway curb cuts to be abandoned, with all site access occurring via the existing joint access easement. These changes result in the need for a new access permit from ODOT. In order to address 1 the criteria by which ODOT evaluates new access permit applications, the proposed access design I was evaluated against the requirements outlined in 734-051-0080 sections (1), (3), and (6) of the Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR). The requirements outlined in sections (1), (3), and (6) are the T criteria for approving an application for a private approach and are shown in bold type. The compliance responses are shown in italics: (1) Private Approach The Department shall approve an Application for an approach for an applicant who applies for a private approach where the subject property has a right of access and the following requirements are met: (a) Where the applicant has no reasonable access to its property, the applicant demonstrates that each of the following requirements are met: , The only roadway accessing the project site is Highway 99W and access must be taken I on Highway 99W. Therefore, this condition applies to the basic need for the primary access through the existing easement. (A)The private approach to the state highway can be accommodated or ;, mitigated consistent with the safety of the traveling public pursuant to the criteria in section (3) of this rule.As described in the traffic analysis, this ' driveway is projected to meet the operational standards set by ODOT as well as meet safety standards with respect to sight distance for vehicles entering and exiting the site. Further, a crash analysis was conducted with the conclusion that ' there is no existing or probable future vehicle safety deficiency within the study area that is significant enough to warrant further investigation or mitigation. (B)The private approach is consistent with the classification of the highway and the highway segment designation of the state highway facility. Highway 99W is a Statewide Highway with an existing easement intended to serve the commercial properties where no other reasonable access is provided. Therefore, the existing easement meets this criterion. A deviation is not required based on the intention of the easement to provide access to the Highway. (2) Safety Criteria:[The project should not have an adverse impact on:] (a) Roadway character, such as classification, number of lanes, capacity, median treatment, and traffic controls.As stated in the previous section, the easement does not impact the roadway character, classification, number of lanes, or capacity. Furthermore, the intention of an easement is to consolidate access along Highway 99W which is supported in this traffic analysis. The roadway character could be improved f Kittelson &Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon i Qutcklube I tgard Development— I Tara, Uregon rroiecith . i yy February 12, 2003 Page:20 through providing access to the signalized intersection at the Tigard Marketplace in the long-term with future development of the Public Storage. This would allow all commercial properties to combining access points along 99W. This merging and may • reduce the number of conflict points along Highway 99W and improve overall capacity and operation in the future. (b) Traffic character, such as speed, crash history, existing and projected volume, vehicle types, pedestrians, site circulation, and peak hour characteristics. The easement does not change the character of the roadway and should improve operations. (c) Geometric character, such as topography,horizontal curves,vertical curves, stopping sight distance, intersection sight distance,clear zone, and right of way. The geometric character will not be changed. (d) Environmental character, such as urban, rural, timber, wetland, drainage,and snowplowing needs. The environmental character will remain. (3) Exemptions to sections (1) and (2) of this rule. (4) Conditional Approval. (5) Reasonable Access. (a) The authorized and planned uses for the property are identified in the acknowledged local comprehensive plan. The proposed development is consistent with the local comprehensive plan. (b) Whether the type, number, size, and location of the approach(es) is adequate to serve the volumes and type of traffic reasonably anticipated to the site, based on the planned uses.Access to Highway 99W via the existing easement is the only proposed access. Long Term Access Management Considerations The proposed access design appears to meet all criteria necessary to receive an access permit from ODOT. It also reflects the minimum number of access drives necessary to provide adequate connection to the study site under current conditions. In the future, however, it is conceivable that improvements to adjoining properties on the west side of Highway 99W could create opportunities for a more efficient, effective, and safe access design strategy. In particular, consideration should be given to provision of access from the proposed Quicklube site to the existing traffic signal serving Tigard Marketplace at such time as this becomes possible. In this instance, access from the Quicklube site could be provided along the northern property line and directly along the Highway 99W frontage to access the signal so as to provide for improved overall circulation and consolidated access for the nearby commercial parcels on the west side of Highway 99W. This concept may be worth exploring further if the existing storage facility happens to redevelop. At that time, a shared access agreement between the affected property owners and ODOT could be developed to allow the commercial properties to share access to the signal. j s Kittelson &Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon Quicklube Tigard Development—Tigard, Oregon Project#:..)/99 February 12,2003 Page: 21 SUMMARY Based on the results of this transportation impact analysis, the proposed site with only one access to Highway 99W at the existing easement can be developed while maintaining acceptable levels-of- service on the surrounding transportation system. Table 7 shows the intersection operations analysis results under year 2003 existing and year 2004 total traffic conditions. Table 7 Summary of Intersection Operational Analysis Findings* 2003 Existing Conditions Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ' Delay V/C Delay Mitigation V/C (sec) LOS (sec) LOS Required? Highway 99W/Site 0.001 10.1 9 0.03 >50 F No Access Easement t Highway 99W/Tigard 0.62 7.4 A 0.59 7.8 A No Marketplace '. 2004 Total Traffic Conditions Highway 99W/Site 0.05 71.2 F 0.24 >50 F No Access Easement t Highway 99W/Tigard 0.64 7.6 A 0.61 7.9 A No Marketplace *Note: Unsignalized intersection LOS and V/C ratio represents operations of critical movement only. LOS: Level-of-service V/C:Volume/Capacity Ratio Delay: Average control delay(seconds/vehicle) Findings • The existing easement onto Highway 99W will operate at acceptable volume-to-capacity ..I and mobility standards during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours with the inclusion of traffic . from the proposed site. • At full build-out, the proposed development is expected to generate approximately 190 net new daily trips, of which 15 trips (10 inbound, 5 outbound) and 20 trips (10 inbound, 10 outbound) will occur during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours, respectively. • For this development, the existing access easement onto Highway 99W will ultimately operate as a full-access to permit both left- and right-turn movements into and out of the site. • The existing easement will meet requirements established in OAR 734-051-0320 with — the development of the proposed site. 1 I 4 1 Kittelson &Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon Quicklube l tgard Development—Tigard, Oregon rYY February 12, 2003 Page: 22 Recommendations • In order to maintain adequate sight distance in either direction at the site access to Highway 99W, shrubs and low growing ground cover should be regularly trimmed and maintained. • Long-term access options should include providing access via an easement north of the proposed site to allow site traffic to access the signal at Highway 99W/Tigard Marketplace. We trust this letter adequately addresses the transportation impacts associated with development of the Tigard Quicklube. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions regarding this analysis. Sincerely, KITTELSON &ASSOCIATES, INC. \J‘ K. Dina M. Sykora W• e K. Kittelson, P.E. Senior Engineering Associate Se for Principal References: 1. Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report No. 209. Transportation Research Board. 1997. -` 2. Trip Generation, 6th Edition. Institute of Transportation Engineers. 1997. 3. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. 1994 Appendices: "A" —Traffic Count Data "B"—Description of Level-of-Service Methods and Criteria "C" —Year 2003 Existing Traffic Conditions Level-of-Service Worksheets "D"—ODOT Crash Data "E"—Year 2004 Total Traffic Conditions Level-of-Service Worksheets "F"— ODOT 7-second gap standard methodology "G" —Unsignalized Queuing Analysis -� PRO/el-9 .-/ 11,494P '� VII Iv OREG ry ; -e/9 A.- 0 �AINE KIT F`5 � Kittelson&Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon afr, INTERSECTION:Peak Hwy—From N^^nrTiw'°Mert'°t PIentrance/saltentrance/saltentrance/salt—FromTIME: 7:00 AM to 8:50 AM—Prom Eel DATE:1172003 ' CONDITIONS:Clear CLIENTS PROJECT ID:5799 QUALITY COUNTS JOB It:203 and 204 _ Peak Hour Turning Movements Peak Hour Link Volumes , ; 11 Pacific Hwy--From North %HV=#N/A K11I'10ii r m m ,N. 16285 SW 85th Avenue,Ste.105 M o I Tigard ,OR 97224 Phone:503-620-4242 . I miii I Storage Driveway--From West • 1 La,. Fax:503 620-4545 } .-- email:email:jrw@qualitycounts.net O L 81 3 r- TOTAL www.qualitycounts.net PHF O -► 0.88 r 0 %HV=#N/A 2,725 %HV=#N/A Pedestrian Crossings —+ 16 0 1 50 15 -i C ▪ 1 r Tigard Market PI.e N 1 1o W- m m r 1 1 ' O ' Pacific Hwy-From South %HV=#N/A C 0 PEAK HOUR: 7:00 AM to 8:00 AM PEAK 15 MINUTES: 7:45 AM to 8:00 AM Pacific Hwy-From North arket Pl.entrance/exit-Fl Pacific Hwy-From SouthStorage Driveway-FromCrosswalk Usage(Peds) Totals Northbound Eastbound By Approach Period15 rBe Count Southbound Westbound Veh Peas Beginning Right Thru Left Right Thru Lett Right Thru Lett, Right Thru Lett WeOst EaOst NoOrth SoOuth 593 0 7:00 AM 0 159 10 22 0 5 6 390 1 0 0 0 7:15 AM 0 172 13 28 0 15 11 386 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 625 0 7:30 AM 0 203 7 21 0 10 9 427 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 678 0 7:45 AM 0 231 16 24 0 11 12 445 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 739 0 8:00 AM 0 202 12 13 0 16 10 404 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 657 1 8:15 AM 1 203 14 23 0 13 11 370 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 637 1 8:30 AM 0 193 13 12 0 11 8 355 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 593 1 8:45 AM 1 204 10 23 2 15 14 334 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 604 0 i. 1e t ,.a Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Pedestrians By Approach HOURLY TOTALS Right Thru Left Right Thru Lett Right Thru Left Right Thr LeftWest East North South Totals 7:00 AM 0 765 46 95 0 41 38 1648 2 0 O O 0 0 0 r 2635 0 7:15 AM 0 808 48 86 0 52 42 1662 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2699 1 7:30 AM 1 839 49 81 0 50 42 1646 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 2711 2 a 7:45 AM 1 829 55 72 0 51 41 1574 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 2626 3 8:00 i%iv, 2 802 49 71 2 55 43 1463 2 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 2491 3 VNNon 1.0 f INTERSECTION:Pacific Hwy—From North/Tigard Market Pi.entrance/etch—From E..t TIME:7:00 AM to 8:50 AM a CONDITIONS:Clear DATE:1/8/2003 CLIENT'S PROJECT ID:5799 QUALITY COUNTS JOB 8:203 Peak Hour Turning Movements Peak Hour Link Volumes , : 11 Pacific Hwy--From North %I-IV=*N/A Mali 01I r,t o o rO 0 16285 SW 85th Avenue,Ste.105 i T Tigard,OR 97224 Storage Driveway--From West I Phone:503-620-4242 + } Fax:503 620-4545 0 L 0 2 — 0 email:jrw@qualitycounts.net PHF TOTAL I www.qualitycounts.net 0 + 0.88 4- 0 %HV=UN/A 4 %HV=*N/A Pedestrian Crossings 2 1 t r--► +r 0 2 ----.----. —• 0 C 0 . 4-1 I Tigard Mkt 1j N O O O O D Pacific Hwy--From South %HV=*N/A L C PEAK HOUR: 7:00 AM to 8:00 AM 0 PEAK 15 MINUTES: 8:15 AM to 8:30 AM f Pacific Hwy-From North arket PI.entrance/exit-Fl Pacific Hwy-From SouthStorage Driveway-From Crosswalk Usage(Peds) Totals 15-Minute Count Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound By Approach Period Beginning,Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left West East North South Veh Pods 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 8:45 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 f}} Y i i is Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Pedestrians By Approach HOURLY TOTALS Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left West East North South Totals 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:30 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 r 7:45 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 -i 5:00 AM 2 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 . V...an r.0 INTERSECTION:Pacltic hwy.-From North/rigard Market Pt.Drlvewey-From East TIME: 4:00 PM to 5:50 PM DATE:1/82003 CONDITIONS:Clear CLIENTS PROJECT ID:5799 QUALITY COUNTS JOB#:207 and 208 Peak Hour Turning Movements Peak Hour Link Volumes , 1. III Pacific Hwy.--From North %HV=#N/A0,1'1,11 O 0 m m n 16285 SW 85th Avenue,Ste.105 �° CO Tigard,OR 97224 Storage Driveway--From West .j i Lw 1 I Phone:503-620-4242 Fax:503 620-4545 4-•-- 173 email:Irw@qualitycounts.net 1 75 14 TOTAL www.qualltycounts.net PHF 0 —► 0.88 r 0 %HV=UN/A 3,302 %HV=#N/A Pedestrian Crossings ----1. —► 65 3 5 r 95 2 + t r Tigard Mkt ! 1 —I L m 1 Tr m M g 5 O.- N Pacific Hwy.-From South %HV=#N/A 77 C 0 • PEAK HOUR: 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM PEAK 15 MINUTES: 5:30 PM to 5:45 PM Pacific Hwy.-From North Market PI.Driveway-FroPacific Hwy.-From SouttSelf Storage Driveway-Fr Crosswalk Usage(Peds) Totals 15Westbound Northbound Eastbound By Approach PeriodrBe Count SouthboundVeh Pads Beginning Right Thru Left Right Thru Lett Right Thru Left Right Thru Lett West East North South 4:00 PM 0 354 23 24 0 25 14 301 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 743 4 4:15 PM 1 375 16 21 0 24 10 320 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 769 3 4:30 PM 1 382 15 16 0 36 13 326 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 791 4 4:45 PM 0 388 29 15 1 28 14 283 1 1 0 0 0 5 3 2 760 10 5:00 PM 2 433 15 20 0 24 12 313 3 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 824 3 5:15 PM 1 412 26 16 0 22 17 321 4 1 0 0 3 3 0 0 820 6 5:30 PM 0 433 27 20 0 27 16 316 1 1 0 0 0 1 3 0 841 4 5:45 PM 1 418 12 19 0 24 19 308 2 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 805 4 4 ;'3 Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Pedestrians By Approach HOURLY TOTALS Right Thru Lett Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left West East North South Totals 4:00 PM 2 1499 83 76 1 113 51 1230 2 5 1 0 5 5 3 8 3063 21 4:15 PM 4 1578 75 72 1 112 49 1242 5 5 1 0 5 6 3 6 3144 20 4:30 PM 4 1615 85 67 1 110 56 1243 9 5 0 0 7 9 3 4 3195 23 4:45 PM 3 1666 97 71 1 101 59 1233 9 5 0 0 5 10 6 2 3245 23 5:00 Pivi4 1696 80 75 0 97 64 1258 10 6 0 0 9 5 3 0 3290 17 Version 1.0 R 4 INTERSECTION:Peals Hwy.-From North/Tigard Market PI.Driveway-From east TIME: 4:00 PM to 5:50 PM a CONDITIONS:Clear DATE:1/8/2003 CLIENTS PROJECT ID:5799 DUALITY COUNTS JOB S:207 Peak Hour Turning Movements Peak Hour Link Volumes• , i 111 Pacific Hwy.-From North %HV=0.0% K11111011 O o O O r7 16285 SW 85th Avenue,Ste.105 I ♦ Tigard,OR 97224 Storage Driveway-From West i 1 +I I Phone:503-620-4242 Fax:503 620-4545 1 t 0 0 r. .— 0 email:Jrw@qualitycounts.net PHF TOTAL www.qualitycounts.net 0 —4 0.88 — 0 %HV=0.0% 4 %HV=0.0% Pedestrian Crossings 1 -1 i�-I t-+ r 0 2 —4 —' 0 C 0 ' 1 1 I Tigard Mkt 1 1 l .- N O N O 0 ri 0 - Pacific Hwy--From South %HV=0.0% K PEAK HOUR: 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM 0 PEAK 15 MINUTES: 4:00 PM to 4:15 PM Pacific Hwy.-From North Market PI.Driveway-Fro Pacific Hwy.-From Soutt'elf Storage Driveway-Fr Crosswalk Usage(Peds) Totals 15-Minute Count Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound By Approach Period Beginnlns Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left West East North South Ven Peas 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 • 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 • .I t Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Pedestrians By Approach HOURLY TOTALS Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left West East North South Totals 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 4:30 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 4:45 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 ....... S:Gv Fivev 1 u U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 •- Version 1.0 Appendix B Description of Level- ., of-Service Methods and Criteria Quicklube Tigard Development—Tigard, Oregon r UJeurr. ..)/» February 12, 2003 Page: 25 Appendix B Level of Service Concept Level of service (LOS) is a concept developed by traffic engineers to gauge the overall quality of the travel experience through an intersection or roadway segment, as it is perceived by the traveler. Six categories are used to denote the various levels of service, which range from A to F.1 Signalized Intersections At signalized intersections, level of service is defined by a single performance measure: average control delay per vehicle. Control delay is defined to include initial deceleration delay, queue move- up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. Table B1 provides a qualitative description of each LOS category as it applies to signalized intersections, and Table B2 identifies the average control delay threshold point used as the boundary for each LOS category. LOS thresholds for the specific reviewing jurisdiction(s) are described in the body of the report. Table B1 Level of Service Definitions (Signalized Intersections) Level of Service Average Delay per Vehicle A Very low average control delay, less than 10 seconds per vehicle. This occurs when progression is extremely favorable, and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay. B Average control delay is greater than 10 seconds per vehicle and less than or equal to 20 seconds per vehicle.This generally occurs with good progression and/or short cycle lengths. More vehicles stop than for a level of service A, causing higher levels of average delay. C Average control delay is greater than 20 seconds per vehicle and less than or equal to 35 seconds per vehicle. These higher delays may result from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear at this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level, although many still pass through the intersection without stopping. p Average control delay is greater than 35 seconds per vehicle and less than or equal to 55 seconds per vehicle. The influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle length, or high volume/capacity ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable. E Average control delay is greater than 55 seconds per vehicle and less than or equal to 80 seconds per vehicle. This is usually considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values generally (but not always) indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high volume/capacity ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. F Average control delay is in excess of 80 seconds per vehicle. This is considered to be unacceptable to most drivers. This condition often occurs with oversaturation. It may also occur at high volume/capacity ratios below 1.0 with many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also contribute to such high delay values, even when the volume/capacity ratio is significantly below 1.0. 1 Most of the material in this appendix is adapted from the Transportation Research Board,Highway Capacity Munuul,(2000). Kittelson &Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon Quicklube Tigard Development-Tigard, Oregon Project#: 5799 February 12, 2003 Page: 26 Table B2 Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections Level of Service Average Control Delay per Vehicle (Seconds) A 55.10 B >10 and 55.20 C >20 and 5.35 D >35 and 555 E >55 and 580 F >80 Unsignalized Intersections Unsignalized intersections include two-way stop-controlled (TWSC) and all-way stop-controlled (AWSC) intersections. The 2000 Highway Capacity Manual provides models for estimating average control delay at both TWSC and AWSC intersections. Table B3 provides a qualitative description of each LOS category as it applies to unsignalized intersections, and Table B4 identifies the average control delay threshold point used as the boundary for each LOS category. LOS thresholds for the specific reviewing jurisdiction(s) are described in the body of the report. Table B3 Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections Level of Average Delay per Vehicle to Minor Street Service • Nearly all drivers find freedom of operation with very little time spent waiting for an A acceptable gap. • Very seldom is there more than one vehicle in queue. • Some drivers begin to consider the average control delay an inconvenience, but acceptable gaps are still very easy to find. ,. • Occasionally there is more than one vehicle in queue. • Average control delay becomes noticeable to most drivers, even though acceptable gaps are found on a regular basis. • It is not uncommon for an arriving driver to find a standing queue of at least one additional vehicle. • Average control delay is long enough to be an irritation to most drivers. Average D control delay is long because acceptable gaps are hard to find, because there is a standing queue of vehicles already waiting when the driver arrives, or both. • Drivers find the length of the average control delay approaching intolerable levels. • Average control delay is long because acceptable gaps are hard to find, because E there is a standing queue of vehicles already waiting when the driver arrives, or both. • There may or may not be substantial excess capacity remaining at the intersection when this condition is encountered. • Most drivers encountering this condition consider the length of the average control delay to be too long. F • Average control delay is long because acceptable gaps are hard to find, because there is a standing queue of vehicles already waiting when the driver arrives, or both. • There may or may not be substantial excess capacity remaining at the intersection when this condition is encountered. Kittelson &Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon Quicklube Tigard Development-Tigard, Oregon Project#:5799 February 12, 2003 Page: 27 Table B4 Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Average Control Delay per Vehicle (Seconds) A 5-10 g >10 and 5515 C >15 and s25 p >25 and 535 E >35 and 550 F >50 It should be noted that the level of service criteria for unsignalized intersections are somewhat different than the criteria used for signalized intersections. The primary reason for this difference is that drivers expect different levels of performance from different kinds of transportation facilities. The expectation is that a signalized intersection is designed to carry higher traffic volumes than an unsignalized intersection. Additionally, there are a number of driver behavior considerations that combine to make delays at signalized intersections less onerous than at unsignalized intersections. For example, drivers at signalized intersections are able to relax during the red interval, while drivers on the minor street approaches to TWSC intersections must remain attentive to the task of identifying acceptable gaps and vehicle conflicts. Also, there is often much more variability in the amount of delay experienced by individual drivers at unsignalized intersections than signalized intersections. For these reasons, the control delay threshold for any given level of service has been set to be less for an unsignalized intersection than for a signalized intersection. While overall intersection level of service is calculated for AWSC intersections, level of service is only calculated for the minor approaches and the major street left turn movements at TWSC intersections. No delay is assumed to the major street through movements. For TWSC intersections, the overall intersection level of service remains undefined: level-of-service is only calculated for each minor street lane. In the performance evaluation of unsignalized intersections, it is important to consider other measures of effectiveness (MOE's) in addition to delay, such as v/c ratios for individual movements, average queue lengths, and 95`''-percentile queue lengths. By focusing on a single MOE for the worst movement only, such as delay for the minor-street left turn, users may make inappropriate traffic control decisions. Kittelson &Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon Appendix C 2003 Existing Conditions Level-of- Service Worksheets n am Fri Jan 17, 2003 11:33:36 Page 1-1 am Fri Jan 17, 2003 11:33:37 Page 2-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project#: 5799 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project#: 5799 Tigard Oil Change Facility Tigard Oil Change Facility 2003 Existing Traffic Conditions - Weekday AM Peak Hour 2003 Existing Traffic Conditions - Weekday AM Peak Hour Scenario Report Turning Movement Report Scenario: am Command: am Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Volume: am Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume Geometry: am Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee #2 Pacific Highway/Proposed Site Access Trip Generation: am Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1686 0 0 890 4 2581 Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Paths: Default Paths Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1686 0 0 890 4 2581 1 Routes: Default Routes Configuration:: Default Configuration #3 Pacific Highway/Tigard MkPl Base 50 0 81 0 0 1 2 1646 42 49 843 1 2715 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 50 0 81 0 0 1 2 1646 42 49 843 1 2715 Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 I S 9 EXAM.OUT 1-17-103 11:33a Page 1 of 5 4,.„ , am Fri Jan 17, 2003 11:33:37 Page 3-1 am Fri Jan 17, 2003 11:33:37 Page 4-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project#: 5799 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project#: 5799 Tigard Oil Change Facility Tigard Oil Change Facility 2003 Existing Traffic Conditions - Weekday AM Peak Hour 2003 Existing Traffic Conditions - Weekday AM Peak Hour Intersection Volume Report Impact Analysis Report 4 Base Volume Alternative Level Of Service Intersection Base Future Change Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in Node Intersection L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- I -- R L -- T -- R LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 2 Pacific Highway/Proposed Site B 10.1 0.000 B 10.1 0.000 + 0.000 V/C 2 Pacific Highw 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1686 0 0 890 4 3 Pacific Highw 50 0 81 0 0 1 2 1646 42 49 843 1 # 3 Pacific Highway/Tigard MkPI A 7.4 0.623 A 7.4 0.623 + 0.000 D/V II Ii Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. is 9 Z EXAM.OUT 1-17-103 11:33a Page 2 of 5 . .... am Fri Jan 17, 2003 11:33:37 Page 5-1 am Fri Jan 17, 2003 11:33:37 Page 6-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project#: 5799 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project#: 5799 Tigard Oil Change Facility Tigard Oil Change Facility 2003 Existing Traffic Conditions - Weekday AM Peak Hour 2003 Existing Traffic Conditions - Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method *************k****************************************************************** Base Volume Alternative Intersection 02 Pacific Highway/Proposed Site Access ******************************************************************************** *************`****************************************************************** Intersection #2 Pacific Highway/Proposed Site Access Average Delay (sec/veh): 10.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** ***`*****`***k****************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - I - R L - T - R Movement: L - I - R L - I - R L - T - R L - T - R HevVeh: I 0% I 0% I 1% I 9% I I Control: Stop Sign II Stop Sign II Uncontrolled II Uncontrolled I Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0% Rights: Include Include Include Include Peds/Hour: 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 Pedestrian Walk Speed: 4.00 feet/sec LaneWidth: 12 feet 12 feet 12 feet 12 feet Volume Module: II II II I Time Period: 0.25 hour Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1686 0 0 890 4 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Signals: I I I I Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1686 0 0 890 4 Link Index: #4 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Dist(miles): 0.000 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Speed (mph): 0.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1833 0 0 967 4 Signallndex: #3 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cycle Time: 0 secs Final Vol.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1833 0 0 967 4 InitVotume: 0 0 Saturation: 0 0 Critical Gap Module: II II II I ArrivalType: 0 0 Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx G/C: 0.00 0.00 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx *** Computation 1: Time for Queue to Clear at Each Upstream Intersection 1 II P: 0.000 0.000 Capacity Module: II II I gq1: 0.00 0.00 Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 972 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx gq2: 0.00 0.00 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 711 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx gq: 0.00 0.00 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 711 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx *** Computation 2: Time Intersection Blocked Because of Upstream Platoons I II II II I alpha: 0.000 Level Of Service Module: beta: 0.000 Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 10.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx to (secs): 0.000 LOS by Move: * * * * * * 8 * * * * * F: 0.000 Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT f: 0.000 0.000 Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx vcmax: 0 0 Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx vcmin: 0 0 Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * tp: 0.0 0.0 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx p: 0.000 ApproachLOS: * * * * *** Computation 3: Platoon Event Periods pdom/psubo: 0.000/0.000/Unconstrained * * Computation 4: Conflicting Flows During Each Unblocked Period InitCnflVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 972 xxxxx xxxxx 0 xxxxx xxxxx UpstreamSat: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 xxxxx xxxxx 0 xxxxx xxxxx UpstreamAdj:1.00 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.000 1.00 x.xxx x.xxx 1.00 x.xxx x.xxx ConflictVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 972 xxxxx xxxxx 0 xxxxx xxxxx *** Computation 5: Capactiy for Subject Movement During Unblocked Period InitPotCap: 0 0 0 0 0 0 711 xxxxx xxxxx 0 xxxxx xxxxx UpstreamAdj:1.00 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.000 1.00 x.xxx x.xxx 1.00 x.xxx x.xxx PotentCap: 0 0 0 0 0 0 711 xxxxx xxxxx 0 xxxxx xxxxx Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. li S 33 EXAM.OUT 1-17-103 11:33a Page 3 of 5 am Fri Jan 17, 2003 11:33:37 Page 7-1 am Fri Jan 17, 2003 11:33:37 Page 8-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project#: 5799 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project#: 5799 Tigard Oil Change Facility Tigard Oil Change Facility 2003 Existing Traffic Conditions - Weekday AM Peak Hour 2003 Existing Traffic Conditions - Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report j 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Operations Method ' ******************************************************************************** Base Volume Alternative Intersection #3 Pacific Highway/Tigard MkPl ******************************************************************************** *************`****************************************************************** Intersection #3 Pacific Highway/Tigard MkPI Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.623 ******************************************************************************** Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 7.4 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Optimal Cycle: 50 Level Of Service: A Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: II I e ? Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Lanes: 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 I II II II I Lane Group: LT LT R xxxx xxxx R L T R L RT RT Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected #LnslnGrps: 2 2 1 0 0 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 Rights: Ovl Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: II II Lanes: 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 CrosswalkWid 8 8 8 8 Volume Moduli: II II II I % Hev Veh: 2 0 1 9 Base Vol: 50 0 81 0 0 1 2 1646 42 49 843 1 Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0% Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking/Hr: No No No No Initial Bse: 50 0 81 0 0 1 2 1646 42 49 843 1 Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 PHF Volume: 54 0 88 0 0 1 2 1789 46 53 916 1 ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 54 0 88 0 0 1 2 1789 46 53 916 1I PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCM Ops f(lt1 Adj Case Module: II I I MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 f(lt) Case: 5 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx Final Vol.: 54 0 88 0 0 1 2 1789 46 53 916 1 II II II I HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: II III Saturation Flow Module: Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Hev Veh Adj: 0.98 xxxx 0.98 xxxx xxxx 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adjustment: 0.94 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.94 0.94 0.84 0.87 0.87 0.87 Grade Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 Parking Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3556 0 1583 0 0 1644 1787 3574 1599 1655 3306 4 Bus Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 II II II I Area Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Capacity Analysis Module: RT Adj: xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.87 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.03 0.03 0.28 0.28 LT Adj: 0.96 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx Crit Moves: **** **** **** PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Green/Cycle: 0.02 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.80 0.80 0.05 0.85 0.85 HCM Sat Adj: 0.94 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.94 0.99 0.84 0.87 0.92 0.92 Volume/Cap: 0.62 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.33 0.62 0.04 0.62 0.33 0.33 Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 61.5 0.0 65.3 0.0 0.0 47.9 76.0 4.3 2.0 59.9 1.6 1.6 MLF Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fnl Sat Adj: 0.94 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.94 0.94 0.84 0.87 0.87 0.87 AdjDel/Veh: 61.5 0.0 65.3 0.0 0.0 47.9 76.0 4.3 2.0 59.9 1.6 1.6 I to II II I Design0ueue: 3 0 5 0 0 0 0 22 1 3 8 0 Delay Adjustment Factor Module: ******************************************************************************** Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > DelAdjFctr: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. i S e 0 Y EXAM.OUT 1-17-103 11:33a Page 4 of 5 • am Fri Jan 17, 2003 11:33:37 Page 8-2 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project#: 5799 Tigard Oil Change Facility 2003 Existing Traffic Conditions - Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (Permitted Left Turn Sat Adj) 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Intersection #3 Pacific Highway/Tigard MkPI ******************************************************************************** Approach: North South East West Cycle Length, C: 100 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Actual Green rime Per Lane Group, G: 2.45 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Effective Green Time Per Lane Group, g: 2.45 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Opposing Effective Green Time, go: 2.45 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Number Of Opposing Lanes, No: 0 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Number Of Lanes In Lane Group, N: 2 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Adjusted Left-Turn Flow Rate, VIt: 54 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Plt: 1.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Proportion of Left Turns in Opp Flow, Plto: 1.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Left Turns Per Cycle, LTC: 1.51 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo: 0 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Opposing Flow Per Lane Per Cycle, Volc: 0.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo: 1.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Lost Time Per Phase, tl: 4.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Eff grn until arrival of left-turn car, gf: 0.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Opposing Queue Ratio, qro: 0.98 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Eff grn blocked by opposing queue, gq: 0.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Eff grn while left turns filter thru, gu: 2.45 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Max opposing cars arriving during gq-gf, n: 0.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Proportion of Opposing Thru & RT cars, ptho: 0.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Left-turn Saturation Factor, fs: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Proportion of Left Turns in Shared Lane, pl: 1.41 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Through-car Equivalents, ell: 1.40 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Single Lane Through-car Equivalents, e12: 1.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Minimum Left Turn Adjustment Factor, fmin: 1.96 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Single Lane Left Turn Adjustment Factor, fm: 1.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Left Turn Adjustment Factor, flt: 0.96 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx it li I I Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. it S EXAM.OUT 1-17-103 11:33a Page 5 of 5 k. ., i .y pm Fri Jan 17, 2003 11:37:22 Page 1-1 pm Fri Jan 17, 2003 11:37:22 Page 2-1 Kittelson & Associates Inc. - Pro ect #:5799 1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Project #:5799 Tigard Oil Change Facility Tigard Oil Change Facility 2003 Existing Traffic Conditions - Weekday PM Peak Hour 2003 Existing Traffic Conditions - Weekday PM Peak Hour Scenario Report Turning Movement Report 1 Scenario: pm Command: pm Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Volume: pm Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume Geometry: pm Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee #2 Pacific Highway/Proposed Site Access Trip Generation: pm Base 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1331 0 0 1796 1 3129 Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Paths: Default Paths Total 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1331 0 0 1796 1 3129 Routes: Default Routes Configuration:: Default Configuration #3 Pacific Highway/Tigard MkPI Base 95 0 75 1 0 5 10 1258 64 80 1696 5 3289 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 95 0 75 1 0 5 10 1258 64 80 1696 5 3289 II 1 Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. I 1 I S a EXPM.OUT 1-17-103 11:37a Page 1 of 5 L.... = % pm Fri Jan 17, 2003 11:37:22 Page 3-1 pm Fri Jan 17, 2003 11:37:22 Page 4-1 I Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project #:5799 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project #:5799 Tigard Oil Change Facility Tigard Oil Change Facility 2003 Existing Traffic Conditions - Weekday PM Peak Hour 2003 Existing Traffic Conditions - Weekday PM Peak Hour Intersection Volume Report Impact Analysis Report Base Volume Alternative Level Of Service Intersection Base Future Change 1 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in Node Intersection L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R LOS Veh C LOS Veh C # 2 Pacific Highway/Proposed Site F 122.5 0.000 F 122.5 0.000 + 0.000 V/C 2 Pacific Highw 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1331 0 0 1796 1 3 Pacific Highw 95 0 75 1 0 5 10 1258 64 80 1696 5 # 3 Pacific Highway/Tigard MkPI A 7.8 0.595 A 7.8 0.595 + 0.000 D/V I Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. S r 9 A EXPM.OUT 1-17-103 11:37a Page 2 of 5 . . ..4 K .. . pm Fri Jan 17, 2003 11:37:22 Page 5-1 pm Fri Jan 17, 2003 11:37:22 Page 6-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Project #:5799 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project #:5799 Tigard Oil Change Facility Tigard Oil Change Facility 2003 Existing Traffic Conditions - Weekday PM Peak Hour 2003 Existing Traffic Conditions - Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method *************r****************************************************************** Base Volume Alternative Intersection 42 Pacific Highway/Proposed Site Access ******************************************************************************** *************'t****************************************************************** Intersection #2 Pacific Highway/Proposed Site Access Average Delay (sec/veh): 122.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - I - R L - I - R L - T - R L - T - R Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I I I I I 1 II II II I HevVeh: 0% 0% 3% 2% ? Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0% Rights: Include Include Include Include Peds/Hour: 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Pedestrian Walk Speed: 4.00 feet/sec 1 11 11 LaneWidth: 12 feet 12 feet 12 feet 12 feet Volume Module: II I Time Period: 0.25 hour Base Vol: 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1331 0 0 1796 1 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream I I I Signals: Initial Bse: 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1331 0 0 1796 1 Link Index: #4 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Dist(mites): 0.000 PHF Adj: (1.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Speed (mph): 0.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1358 0 0 1833 1 Signallndex: #3 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cycle Time: 0 secs Final Vol.: 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1358 0 0 1833 1 lnitVolume: 0 0 Saturation: 0 0 Critical Gap lModule: II II II I ArrivalType: 0 0 Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx G/C: 0.00 0.00 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx *** Computation 1: Time for Queue to Clear at Each Upstream Intersection u P: 0.000 0.000 Capacity Module: II II II I gq1: 0.00 0.00 Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 2512 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx gq2: 0.00 0.00 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 32 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx gq: 0.00 0.00 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 32 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx *** Computation 2: Time Intersection Blocked Because of Upstream Platoons 1 11 11 11 1 alpha: 0.000 Level Of Service Module: beta: 0.000 Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 122.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx to (secs): 0.000 i LOS by Move: * * * F * * * * * * * * F: 0.000 Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT f: 0.000 0.000 Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx vcmax: 0 0 Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx vcmin: 0 0 Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * tp: 0.0 0.0 ApproachDel: xxxxxx 122.5 xxxxxx xxxxxx p: 0.000 ApproachLOS: * F * * *** Computation 3: Platoon Event Periods pdom/psubo: 0.000/0.000/Unconstrained *** Computation 4: Conflicting Flows During Each Unblocked Period InitCnflVol: 0 0 0 2512 0 0 0 xxxxx xxxxx 0 xxxxx xxxxx UpstreamSat: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 xxxxx xxxxx 0 xxxxx xxxxx UpstreamAdj:1.00 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.000 1.00 x.xxx x.xxx 1.00 x.xxx x.xxx ConflictVol: 0 0 0 2512 0 0 0 xxxxx xxxxx 0 xxxxx xxxxx *** Computation 5: Capactiy for Subject Movement During Unblocked Period InitPotCap: 0 0 0 32 0 0 0 xxxxx xxxxx 0 xxxxx xxxxx UpstreamAdj:1.00 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.000 1.00 x.xxx x.xxx 1.00 x.xxx x.xxx PotentCap: 0 0 0 32 0 0 0 xxxxx xxxxx 0 xxxxx xxxxx Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. S y EXPM.OUT 1-17-103 11:37a Page 3 of 5 pm Fri Jan 17, 2003 11:37:22 Page 7-1 pm Fri Jan 17, 2003 11:37:22 Page 8-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project #:5799 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project #:5799 Tigard Oil Change Facility Tigard Oil Change Facility 2003 Existing Traffic Conditions - Weekday PM Peak Hour 2003 Existing Traffic Conditions - Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report I2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Operations Method *************k****************************************************************** Base Volume Alternative Intersection #3 Pacific Highway/Tigard MkPl ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Pacific Highway/Tigard MkPl Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.595 ******************************************************************************** Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 7.8 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Optimal Cycle: 48 Level Of Service: A Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utiliza ion Module: II e Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Lanes: 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1- 1e II II a Lane Group: LT LT R LTR LTR LTR L T R L RT RT Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected #LnslnGrps: 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 Rights: Ovl Include Ovl Include I II Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HCM Ops Inpu Saturation Adj odule: II e Lanes: 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 I II 11 II I CrosswalkWid 8 8 8 8 Volume Module.: % Hev Veh: 1 17 3 2 Base Vol: 95 0 75 1 0 5 10 1258 64 80 1696 5 Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0% Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking/Hr: No No No No Initial Bse: 95 0 75 1 0 5 10 1258 64 80 1696 5 Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PHF Adj: 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 PHF Volume: 97 0 77 1 0 5 10 1284 65 82 1731 5 ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 97 0 77 1 0 5 10 1284 65 82 1731 5 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCM Ops f(lt Adj Case Modul1: II II e MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 f(lt) Case: 5 xxxx xxxx 5 xxxx 5 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx Final Vol.: 97 0 77 1 0 5 10 1284 65 82 1731 5 II II ll ( HCM Ops Saturatione: II II e Adj Module: Saturation Flow Module: Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Hey Veh Adj: 0.99 xxxx 0.99 0.86 xxxx 0.86 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.84 0.71 1.00 0.71 0.92 0.92 0.83 0.93 0.93 0.93 Grade Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.17 0.00 0.83 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 Parking Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3593 0 1599 226 0 11281753 3505 15681769 3527 10Bus Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 11 1: 11 1 Area Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Capacity Analysis Module: RT Adj: xxxx xxxx 0.85 0.89 xxxx 0.89 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.37 0.04 0.05 0.49 0.49 LT Adj: 0.96 xxxx xxxxx 0.94 xxxx 0.94 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx Crit Moves: **** **** **** PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Green/Cycle: 0.05 0.00 0.14 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.01 0.74 0.74 0.09 0.82 0.82 HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 1.00 0.84 0.71 1.00 0.71 0.92 0.97 0.83 0.93 0.98 0.98 Volume/Cap: 0.59 0.00 0.34 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.59 0.49 0.06 0.49 0.59 0.59 Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 52.7 0.0 39.9 46.5 0.0 46.5 95.1 5.4 3.5 45.4 3.3 3.3 MLF Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fnl Sat Adj: 0.95 1.00 0.84 0.71 1.00 0.71 0.92 0.92 0.83 0.93 0.93 0.93 AdjDel/Veh: 52.7 0.0 39.9 46.5 0.0 46.5 95.1 5.4 3.5 45.4 3.3 3.3 II II e: e Designoueue: 5 0 4 0 0 0 1 20 1 4 19 0 Delay Adjustment Factor Module: ******************************************************************************** Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > DelAdjFctr: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. I S EXPM.OUT 1-17-103 11:37a Page 4 of 5 pm Fri Jan 17, 2003 11:37:22 Page 8-2 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project #:5799 Tigard Oil Change Facility 2003 Existing Traffic Conditions - Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (Permitted Left Turn Sat Adj) I 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative ******************************************************************************** Intersection N3 Pacific Highway/Tigard MkPI Approach: North South East West Cycle Length, C: 100 100 xxxxxx xxxxxx Actual Green Time Per Lane Group, G: 4.54 4.54 xxxxxx xxxxxx Effective Green Time Per Lane Group, g: 4.54 4.54 xxxxxx xxxxxx ii Opposing Effective Green Time, go: 4.54 4.54 xxxxxx xxxxxx Number Of Opposing Lanes, No: 1 1 xxxxxx xxxxxx Number Of Lanes In Lane Group, N: 2 1 xxxxxx xxxxxx Adjusted Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt: 97 1 xxxxxx xxxxxx Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Plt: 1.00 0.17 xxxxxx xxxxxx Proportion of Left Turns in Opp Flow, Pito: 0.17 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Left Turns Per Cycle, LTC: 2.69 0.03 xxxxxx xxxxxx Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo: 6 0 xxxxxx xxxxxx Opposing Flow Per Lane Per Cycle, Volc: 0.17 0.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo: 1.00 1.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx Lost Time Per Phase, tl: 4.00 4.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx Eff grn until arrival of left-turn car, gf: 0.00 0.14 xxxxxx xxxxxx Opposing Queue Ratio, qro: 0.95 0.95 xxxxxx xxxxxx Eff grn blocked by opposing queue, gq: 0.00 0.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx Eff grn while left turns filter thru, gu: 4.54 4.40 xxxxxx xxxxxx Max opposing cars arriving during gq-gf, n: 0.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Proportion of Opposing Thru & RT cars, ptho: 0.83 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Left-turn Saturation Factor, fs: xxxxxx 0.88 xxxxxx xxxxxx Proportion of Left Turns in Shared Lane, pl: 1.61 0.17 xxxxxx xxxxxx Through-car Equivalents, ell: 1.41 1.40 xxxxxx xxxxxx Single Lane Through-car Equivalents, e12: 1.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Minimum Left Turn Adjustment Factor, fmin: 1.15 0.52 xxxxxx xxxxxx Single Lane Left Turn Adjustment Factor, fm: 1.00 0.94 xxxxxx xxxxxx Left Turn Adjustment Factor, flt: 0.96 0.94 xxxxxx xxxxxx ******************************************************************************** d Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. IS A 1 a EXPM.OUT 1-17-103 11:37a Page 5 of 5 JAN-31-2003 13:27 P.03 CITY - TIGARD HWWASHINGTON HWY PACIFIC HWY 99W BETWEEN SW PARK ST TO SW WATKINS AVE PERIOD FR. - 01/01/97 TO - 12/31/01 COMPILED BY - SMV DATE - 01/31/03 SW PARK ST I o I & 9.93 I i { <" $ LEGEND tof Pedestrian .Pah > 4 I I • Person KIYeo -0-----Path of Anlmd 4---Ped.KIAMO `0—Vehicle Moving T O Person Inl. ..--.--vehicle Stopped 5 dl eo I T{� - 9.95 1 O r I I . ---Pod.InJ. 91 • v.hide BooKino j y I Property Oemage OrAY `i CoMslon -Rear-end © Properly Parked J J —. . k s.—Colllelon- .od-on riprop.rly Pork.] ` $ ` '�--....„Collision -Sideswipe ..-syr,v.hlcl.ov.rturned * Awaiting Lett Turn ..--./\Vehicle Skldd.d 6-a-2P - 9.97 0<. 4171 9.98 ." 10.06 I 1- -AP o c ? r 0 g - Io.01 �' g - 10. 11 1 i I F2' 4 _ - 10.12 I I 0 S - 10.03 C ) J�' r�1O I ' k �... t-§ r S - 10.04 aTr1 -1 _ I0.I4 0 i ;$0 it:i 14 'i SW WATKINS AVE 1 f 1/16/2003 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE 1 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING M CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR - REPORT EPSUMS2A E3 0_ PACIFIC HWY 99N BETWEEN SW PARK ST 4 SN WATKINS AVE 1/01/97-12/31/01 NON- PROP. I FATAL FATAL DAMAGE CRASHES PEOPLE PEOPLE DRY WET INTER- OFF- YEAR COLLISION TYPE CRASHES CRASHES ONLY TOTAL KILLED INJURED TRUCKS SURF SURF DAY DARK SECTION ROAD 1997 REAR-END 1 1 2 1 2 2 1997 SIDBSWIPR-OVERTAK1140 1 1 1 1 1997 TURNING MOVEMENTS 1 1 1 1 1 . 1997 YEAR TOTALS 2 2 4 2 4 4 1998 REAR-END 6 2 8 11 7 1 8 1998 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2 1 3 4 3 3 1 1998 YEAR TOTALS 8 3 11 15 10 1 11 1 1999 REAR-END 2 2 1 1 1 1 1999 TURNING MOVEMENTS 1 1 1 1 1999 FIXED/OTHER OBJECT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1999 YEAR TOTALS 1 3 4 1 3 1 2 2 1 2000 REAR-END - 4 1 5 6 1 4 1 2 3 2000 TURNING MOVEMENTS 1 1 1 1 2000 YEAR TOTALS 4 2 6 6 1 4 2 3 3 2001 REAR-END 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 2001 TURNING MOVEMENTS 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 2001 YEAR TOTALS 2 2 4 2 1 3 3 1 FINAL TOTALS 17 12 29 26 1 22 7 23 6 2 V1 'Cr .-1 M 8 (V I l0 Z ti t: r4,r: . . - ..v .. I01/16/2003 CONTINUOUS SYSTEM ACCIDENT LIS T I NG PAGE 1 PACIFIC ANY 99W BETWEEN SW PARE ST 6 SW WATRINB AVE 1/01/97-12/31/01 1N, PACIFIC HWY. NEST 0: INTER OR ROAD- (MEDIAN) TYPE RE8- SERIAL DATS/ CHAR/ TYPE/TORN WRATH/ ACC- PART/- VHS LIC/ NO./ DAY- COUNTY/ SYSTEM/ FIRST/ CONE DIREC LEGS OR SURF- COLL/ CIPNT/ OWNER/ AGE- MOVE/ ERROR/ EVENT/ INVEST TIME CITY PFX-MILEP INTRSCT -RAMP -LOC (LANES) LIGHT CLASS SEVRTY TYPE SEX FR-TO ACTION CAUSE 03230 04/26/98 WASHINGTON PR-ART 1901 STRGHT (UNDIV) CIA C REAR 01 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STROHT NO SLOW NOTREC SUN 01P TIGARD 0 9.93 1902 SW 5 (4 ) DRY DAY INA INJB PASS 78 F SN NE NONE FOL-CLOS 02 MVOP PRI ORI-Y STRGHT NUNS INJC PASS 32 N SW NE SLOW ON 03 INJC 26 F PSNGR 10876 12/08/99 WASHINGTON PR-ART 1901 STRGHT (UNDIV) RAIN E REAR 01 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRONT REAR-END NONE WED 04P TIGARD 0 9.93 1902 SW 6 (4 ) NET DUSK PDO PDO PASS 30 F SW NE SKIDDED FOL-CLOS 02 MVOP PRI OR1-9 STOP NONE PDO PASS 44 F SW NE STOPPED 09049 10/23/99 WASHINGTON PR-ART 1901 STRGHT (DNDIV) CLR E REAR 01 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGNT REAR-END NOTREC SAT 04P TIGARD 0 9.95 1902 SN 3 (4 ) DRY DAY P00 PDO PASS 51 M NE SW NONE FOL-CLOS 02 MVOP PRI NON-Y STOP NONE PDO PASS 50 M NE SN STOPPED 07406 08/14/00 WASHINGTON PR-ART 1901 STROHT (UNDIV) CLR E REAR 01 MVOP PRI OR1-N STRGHT REAR-END NOTREC MON 12N TIGARD 0 9.95 1902 SW 3 (4 ) DRY DAY INS PDO PASS 00 N NH SW NONE FOL-CLOS 02 MVOP PRI ORI-Y STOP NONE EVENT]] INJC PASS 39 F NS SN STOPPED 03 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP NOWT PDO PASS 44 P NH SW STOPPED 04733 06/03/01 WASHINGTON PR-ART 1901 ALLEY 0-LEG CLDY N TURN 01 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STROHT NONE CITY SUN 01P TIGARD 0 9.95 1902 SW 3 4 DRY DAY INA PDO PASS 18 M NE SW NONE t 02 MVOP PRI OR1-Y TURN-L L IN TRF INJC PASS S1 M SN NW ENTER DW IMP-TURN 05230 06/29/98 WASHINGTON PR-ART 1901 STRGHT (UNDIV) CLR E REAR 01 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT REM-ENO NONE MON 01P BEAVERTON 0 9.95 1902 8N 6 (4 ) DRY DAY INS PDO PASS 53 F IN NE NONE FOL-CLOS 02 MVOP PRI OR2-Y STOP NONE IRIS PASS 48 M SW NE STOPPED 03 1NJE 12 M PSNOR 04 INJE 40 0 PSNGR V .a "'; 05315 06/24/01 WASHINGTON PR-ART 1901 ALLEY 0-LEG RAIN J TURN 01 MVOP PRI OR2-Y TURN-L NO ROFM[ NOTREC SUN 02P TIGARD 0 9.97 1902 SW 5 4 NET DAY PDO PDO PASS 36 F SE SW EXIT DWY NO-YIELD W N I lZD Q ti I01/16/2003 CONTINUOUS SYSTEM ACCIDENT LISTING PAOE 2 PACIFIC HWY 99N SEMEN SW PARE ST & SM WATRINS AVE 1/01/97-12/31/01 1W, PACIFIC HWY. WEST m Cl: IHTRR OR ROAD- (MEDIAN) TYPE RES- SERIAL DATE/ CHAR/ TYPE/TURN REATH/ ACC- PARTI- VDU LIC/ NO./ DAY- COUNTY/ SYSTEM/ FIRST/ CONN DIREC LEGS OR SURF- COLL/ CIPNT/ OWNER/ AGE- MOVE/ ERROR/ EVENT/ INVEST TIME CITY PFE-MILEP INTRSCT -RAMP -LOC (LANES) LIGHT CLASS SEVRTY TYPE SEX FR-TO ACTION CAUSE j 02 MVOP PRI OR1-Y TURN-L NCNB PDO PASS 26 M NW NE EXIT DRY 10449 11/28/99 WASHINGTON PR-ART 1901 STRGHT (UNDIV) CLDY 8 FIX 01 MVOP PRI OR1-N ETRGHT UNSPEVIII POLE UTL CITY SUN 08P TIGARD 0 9.98 2202 SW 1 (4 ) DRY DLIT INJ 11108 PASS 46 M NE SW NCNB MACH-DEF OVERTURNED AFTER FIRST HARMFUL EVENT 11096 12/01/00 WASHINGTON PR-ART 1901 STRGHT (UNOIV) CLDY C REAR 01 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT TO CLOSE CITY FRI 05P TIGARD 0 10.01 1902 SW 3 (4 ) DRY DLIT DU PDO PASS 53 M NE SW NONE FOL-CLOS 02 MVOP PRI OR1-1 STRGHT NONE INJC PASS 38 M NE SW NONE 03 INJC 31 F PSNGR 'r�tp` 04 ON04 01 P PSNGR S,41..'.0( \ MIDIS')00555 01/24/98 WASHINGTON PR-ART 1901 STRGHT DIS') RAIN REAR 01 MVOP PRI OR2-Y STROHT REAR-END 77 NOTREC SAT 040 TIOARD 0 10.01 1902 SW 6 (4 ) WET DAY DU PDO PASS 41 M SW NE MOVE FOL-CLOS 02 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP NONE EVENT13 PDO PASS 43 M SW NE STOPPED 03 INJB 07 M PSNGR 04 MVOP PRI OR2-7 STOP NONE INJC PASS 40 M SW NE STOPPED 01281 02/16/98 WASHINGTON PR-ART 1901 STRGHT (UNDIV) CLR E REAR 01 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT REAR-END NONE MON 04P TIGARD 0 10.03 1902 SW 5 (4 ) DRY DAY INJ PDO PASS 34 F SW NE NONE FOL-CLOS 02 UN04 03 F PSNGR 03 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP NONE PINJC PASS 46 M SW NE STOPPED 06901 08/17/97 WASHINt.1VN PR-ART 1901 STROHY (UNDIV) CLR E REAR 01 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT REAR-END HONE SUN 03P TIGARD 0 10.04 2605 NE 3 (4 ) DRY DAY IWJ POO PASS 17 M NE SW NCNB FOL-CLOS 02 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP NONE INJC PASS 18 F NE SW STOPPED t0 7 02981 04/18/98 WASHINGTON PR-ART 1901 ALLEY 0-LEG CLDY S REAR 01 MVOP PRI 0111-Y STROHT REAR-END ,.a NONE SAT 11A TIGARD 0 10.04 1902 SW 3 4 DRY DAY PDO PDO PASS 24 F NE SM NONE FOL-CLAS 4-1 02 19004 01 P PSNGR 17 m m N 1 tD a k I01/16/2003 CONTINUOUS SYSTEM ACCIDENT LISTING PAGE 3 PACIFIC HEY 99M BEINEEN SW PARR ST B SW MATRIWS AVE 1/01/97-12/31/01 111, PACIFIC HWY. WEST 0_ INTER OR ROAD- (MEDIAN) TYPE RES- SERIAL DATE/ CHAR/ TYPE/TURN WRATH/ ACC- PARTI- VEH LIC/ NO./ DAY- COUNTY/ SYSTEM/ FIRST/ CONN DIREC LEGS OR SURF- COLL/ CIPNT/ OWNER/AGE- MOVE/ ERROR/ EVENT/ INVEST TIME CITY PPX-MILRP INTRSCI -RAMP -LOC (LANES) LIGHT CLASS SEVRTY TYPE SEX FR-TO ACTION CAUSE 1 07 ON04 04 M MGR 04 UN04 02 P PSNOR 05 MOP PRI OR1-Y STOP NONE PDO PASS 48 M NB SW STOPPED 01224 02/17/98 WASHINGTON PR-ART 1901 STRGHT (ONDIV) CLR E REAR 01 MVOP PRI 0R1-Y STRGHT MATTER NONE TUE 03P TIOARD 0 10.04 1902 SW 6 (4 ) DRY DAY INJ PDO PASS 64 P SW NE DISTRCTD POL-CLOS 02 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP NONE INJC PASS 20 N SW NE STOPPED AL 00528 01/21/00 WASHINGTON PR-ART 1901 ALLOY 0-LEG CLR B TURN 01 MVOP PRI ORL-Y STRGHT NONE S7 NONE FRI 08A TIGARD 0 10.06 2605 NE 4 4 NET DAY PDO PDO PASS 26 F NB SW NONE 02 MVOP PRI 0R1-Y TURN-L NO ROPMY', PDO PASS 25 M SE SN QXIT DWY NO-YIELD 6 00172 01/09/97 WASHINGTON PR-ART 1901 STRGHT IONDIV) CLR H REAR 01 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STACEY PEAR-END NONE THU 019 TIGARD 0 10.06 2605 NE 6 (4 ) DRY DAY PDO PDO PASS 60 F SW NE NONE POL-CLOS 02 MVOP PRI 0R1-Y STOP NONE PDO PASS 33 F SW NE STOPPED 03 UN04 01 P P9NGR 400375 01/15/98 WASHINGTON PR-ART 1901 ALLEY 0-LEG CLR B TORN 01 MVOP PRI 0R1-Y STRONT DIS BONL 1 NOIREC THU 02P TIGARD 0 10.06 2605 NB 6 4 DRY DAY PDO PDO PASS 29 M SW NE NONE DIE-•RAG 02 MVOP PRI 0R1-Y TURN-L NONE PDO PASS 63 P SE SW EXIT DWY 04634 06/07/98 WASHINGTON PR-ART 1901 BTROHT (UNDIV) CLR R REAR 01 MVOP PRI . 0R1-Y STRGHT REAR-END 1 NOTREC SUN 03P TIGARD 0 10.06 1902 NE 6 (4 ) DRY DAY PDO PDO PASST 59 M SW NE NONE FOL-CLOS 1 02 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP NONE PDO PASS 37 F SW NE STOPPED 04559 06/12/98 WASHINGTON PR-ART 1901 STRGHT (UNDIV) CLR E REAR 01 MVOP PAI 0R1-Y STRGHT REAR-SND 1O NONE FRI 12N TIGARD 0 10.06 1902 SW 4 (4 ) DRY DAY INJ 114J11 PASS 21 F NE SW NONE POL-CLOS V 02 MVOP PAI ORL•Y STOP NONE EVENTI3 -+ PDO PASS 44 N NE SW STOPPED 03 HOOP PRI 0111-Y STOP NONE PDO PASS 18 P NE SW STOPPED M wD 1 h -......,H 4....t�.� K4..�..,.u' S err. -...J 14;;*-4- 1., ..,_ ..... 5..._... 1.... ....� .. ./ A. .. I01/16/2003 CONTINUOUS SYSTEM ACCIDENT LISTING PAGE 4 PACIFIC HWY 99W BETWEEN BM PARR ST & SW HATRINS AVE 1/01/97-12/31/01 6 1W, PACIFIC HWY. WEST 0_ INTER OR ROAD- (MEDIAN) TYPE RES- SERIAL DATE/ CHAR/ TYPE/TURN MEATH/ ACC- PARTI- VBA LIC/ NO./ DAY- COUNTY/ SYSTEM/ FIRST/ CONN DIREC LEGS OR SURF- COLL/ CIPNT/ OMIER/ AGE- MOVE/ ERROR/ EVENT/ INVEST TIME CITY PPE-MILEP INTRSCT -RAMP -LOC (LANES) LIGHT CLASS SEVRTY TYPE SEX FR-TO ACTION CAUSE i 04 MYOP PRI ORI-Y STRGHT REAR-END PDO PASS 70 F NE SW PRIOR AC FOL-CLOS 2> 05768 07/16/98 %ARRINGTON PR-ART 1901 ALLEY 0-LEO CLR 6 TURN 01 MVOP PRI OR1-Y TURN-R BIKE ROW NONE THU 04P TIGARD 0 10.06 1902 SW 7 4 DRY DAY INJ PDO PASS 72 M SE SW ACTION20 NO-YIELD 02 MISC BIC (IC STRGHT NRNGSIDE INJB 9 M NE SW NONE LEFT-CEN .wt 00637 01/25/97 WASHINGTON PR-ART 1901 ALLEY 0-LEG CLR H TURN 01 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT NONE fl. "`, NONE SAT 03P TIGARD 0 10.11 2605 NE 3 4 DRY DAY INJ INJC PASS 39 M NE SW NONE �J 02 MVOP PRI OR1-Y TURN-L L IN TRP PDO PASS 43 F SW NW ENTER DW NO-YIELD 06987 08/05/00 WASHINGTON PR-ART 1901 STROHT CVNDIV) CLR E REAR 01 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT BASCRULE 4e. ?' NONE SAT 04P TIGARD 0 10.11 0901 NE 5 (4 ) DRY DAY INJ PDO TRUCE 59 M SW NE NONE TOO-FAST 1i 02 MVOP PRI NON-Y STOP NONE INJC PASS 40 M SW NE STOPPED 03 INJC 11 M PSNGR 03200 04/14/99 WASHINGTON PR-ART 1901 ALLEY 0-LE0 CLR B TURN DI MVOP PRI 0(11-7 TURN-R NO ROFWY NONE WED 02P TIGARD 0 10.12 2605 SW 3 4 DRY DAY PDO PDO PASS 11 M NW SN EXIT DRY NO-YIELD 02 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT NONE PDO PASS 31 P NB SW NONE 1 07199 08/23/01 WASHINGTON PR-ART 1901 STRGHT (DNDIV) RAIN S REAR 01 MVOP PRI 0111-Y STRCHT REAR-END NONE THU O1P TICARD 0 10.14 2605 N$ 3 (9 ) NET DAY INJ PDO PASS 18 M NE SW DISTECTD TOO-FAST 02 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP NONE INJC PASS 56 P NE SM STOPPED 11137 12/13/01 WASHINGTON PR-ART 1901 STRGHT (UNDIV) RAIN E REAR 01 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STRGHT REAR-END NOTREC THU 06P TIGARD 0 10.14 2605 NE 3 (4 ) WET DLIT PDO PDO PASS 24 P NE H NONE FOL-CTAS 02 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STOP NONE O PDO PASS 58 N NE SW NONE .ti 'i 05673 06/25/00 WASHINGTON PR-ART 1901 STRGHT (UNDIV) CLR B REAR 01 MVOP PRI NON-Y STRUM REAR-END th CITT SUN 09P TIGARD 0 10.14 2605 NE 4 (5 ) DRY DLIT INS PDO PASS 42 N NE SN NONE VOL-CLOS 8 02 MVOP PRI ORI-Y STOP NONE N INJC PASS 18 F NE SW STOPPED I _D Q ti • 01/16/2003 CONTINUOUS SYSTEM ACCIDENT L I ST I NG PACE 5 PACIFIC HAY 99W BKTNRE34 SW PARE ST i SW WATEINS AVE 1/01/97-12/31/01 CO 1W, PACIFIC HWY. NEST O_ INTER OR ROAD- (MEDIAN) TYPE RE9- SERIAL DATE/ CHAR/ TYPE/TURN HEATH/ ACC- PARTI- VEH LIC/ NO./ DAY- COUNTY/ SYSTEM/ FIRST/ CONN DIREC LEOS OR sup,- CULL/ CIPNT/ OWNER/ AGE- MOVE/ ERROR/ EVENT/ INVEST TIME CITY PFE-MILEP INTRSCT -RAMP -LOC (LANES) LIGHT CLASS SEVRTY TYPE SEX FR-TO ACTION CAUSE 12250 10/09/0D WASHINGTON PR-ART 1901 STRGNT (UNDIV) RAIN S REAR 01 MVOP PRI OR1-Y STREW REAR-END NONE MON 07P TIGARD 0 10.14 2605 NE 4 (4 ) WET DLIT PDO P00 PASS 44 F NE SW SKIDDED TOO-FAST 02 MVOP PRI CINE-O STOP NONE PDO PASS 00 M NB SW STOPPED 01512 02/22/97 WASHINGTON PR-ART 1901 STRGHT (UNDIV) CLR C SS-0 01 H-R PRI IRIS-U STRGHT IMP LANE NONE SAT OSA TIGARD 0 10.14 2602 SW 3 (4 ) DRY DAT PDD PDO PASS 00 U NE SW NONE 0TH•IMP 02 MVOP PRO OR1-Y STRGHT NONE PDO PASS 74 P NE SW NONE 97371 09/02/98 WASHINGTON PR-ART 1901 ALLEY 0-LEG CLR H TURN 01 MVOP PRI OR1-Y TURN-L L IN TRF NOTRBC WED OIP TIGARD 0 10.14 1902 SW 6 4 DR! DAY INS PDO PASS 42 F NE 6 ENTER DA NO-YIELD 02 MVOP PRI ORI-Y STRGHT NONE EVENT13 INJR PASS 50 M SN NE NONE FORCED EY IMPACT INTO ANOTHER VEHICLE 03 MVOP PRI ORI-! BIRCH/ NONE PDO PASS 35 M SW NE NONE 04 PROP PRI OR1•Y STRGHT NONE EVENT13 INJC PASS 39 N NE SW NONE 05 INJC 59 M PENOR 06 PROP PRI ORI-Y STRGHT NONE PDO PASS 71 F NE SN NONE .-1 ti t0 • ... CODES EMPLOYED IN PREVIOUS ACCIDENTS ... CLASS CODE USED DESCRIPTION Qd DL DRIVER ACTION 01 2 SKIDDED 04 2 DISTRCTD DRIVER ATTENTION DISTRACTED O F 06 1 SLOW EW VEHICLE SLOWED DOWN 11 19 STOPPED STOPPED TN TRAFFIC EXCEPT FOR LEFT TURN 18 5 EXIT DRY ENTERED ROADWAY FROM AILEY OR DRIVEWAY 19 3 ENTER DWY ENTERING ALLEY OR DRIVEWAY 20 1 IMPACT PRIOR TO ENTERING ROADWAY 22 1 PRIOR ACC HIT OBJECT FROM PREVIOUS ACCIDENT PRO-ACTION NO CODES USED DRIVER ERROR 04 3 L IN TRF LEFT TURN IN FRONT OF ONCOMING TRAFFIC 16 1 INATTEN INATTENTION (AS OP 1997 ACCIDENTS) 17 1 UNSFEVEH DRIVING MIME VEHICLE 20 1 DIS HOWL DISREGARDED TRAFFIC SIGNAL 26 16 REAR-END FAILED TO AVOID STOPPED OR PARKED VEHICLE 27 1 BIKE ROW PEDALCYCLIST HAD RIGHT-OF-WAY 20 3 ND ROFFY DID NOT HAVE RIGHT-OP-WAY 39 1 MENUSIDB DRIVING au WRONG SIDE OF ROAD 42 1 NO BLOW DID NOT DECELERATE FOR SLOWER VEHICLE 43 l TO CLOSE FOLLOWED TOO CLOSELY 45 1 IMP LANE IMPROPER CHANGE OF TRAFFIC LANES 47 1 BASCRULE DRIVING TOO PAST FOR CONDITIONS FED MOVEMENT NO CODES USED EVENTS 10 1 OVERTURN OVERTURNED AFTER FIRST HARMFUL EVENT 13 6 FORCED BY IMPACT INTO ANOTHER VEHICLE 53 1 POLE UTL POLE, POWER OR TELEPHONE TYPE OP ACCIDENT CODES COLLISION WITH ANOTHER MOTOR VEHICLE IN TRAFFIC COLLISION OF MOTOR VESICLE WITH: A ENTERING AT ANILE - ONE VEHICLE STOPPED 1 MOTOR VEHICLE ON S ENTERING AT ANGLE - ALL OTHERS OTHER ROADWAY C FROM SAME DIRECTION - BOTH GOING STRAIGHT 2 PARKED MOTOR VEHICLE D FROM SAME DIRECTION - ONE TURN, ORE STRAIGHT 3 PEDESTRIAN E PROM SAME DIRECTION - ONE STOPPED 4 RAILROAD TRAIN F FROM SAME DIRECTION - ALL OTHERS (INCL PARKING) 6 BICYCLIST G FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - BOTH GOING STRAIGHT 7 ANIMAL H FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - ONE LEFT TURN, COLE STRAIGHT 8 FIXED OBJECT I FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - ONE STOPPED 9 OTHER OBJECT J FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - ALL OTHERS (INCL PARKING) S OVERTURNED 0 OTHER NON-COLLISION M N N t0 (I HIGHWAY 1W, PACIFIC WEST a 2001 CRASHES PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES START M.P. SECTION DESCRIPTION MILES CRASH ADT 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 PORTLAND 5.76- PACIFIC HWY 1 /I-5 NBD TO SCHMEER ROAD .54 15,400 5.22- SCHMEER RD TO N ARGYLE ST/BEGIN CITY JURIS. .47 5 16,165 1.79 .34 .74 .75 1.88 0.44- STATE JURIS/STEEL BR TO CITY 7URIS/NW COUCH .38 3 22,600 .95 3.37 1.28 .32 .97 0.85 STATE JURIS/JCT HWY 47 TO JCT MT HOOD HWY 26 .67 10 22,920 1.77 1.22 2.83 2.34 .73 1 1.53 JCT MT HOOD HWY 26 TO U-XING BARBUR BLVD .44 2 19,500 .63 .96 1.60 .65 1.97 U-XING BARBUR BLVD TO JCT CAPITOL HWY 1.22 36 36,793 2.19 1.43 1.95 1.60 1.80 s 3.19 CAPITOL HWY TO SW TERWILLIGER BLVD .89 11 19,095 1.76 2.76 1.67 1.86 2.05 4.08 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD TO SW CAPITOL HWY INT I-5 2.13 61 24,827 3.15 2.79 2.90 3.00 3.68 6.21 SW CAPITOL HY INTERCHANGE TO 0-XING PACIFIC HY 1 1.21 13 19,764 1.48 1.45 2.16 2.63 3.01 7.42 0-XING PACIFIC HWY 1 TO WASH COUNTY /ECL TIGARD .19 7 29,605 3.40 4.74 5.78 5.36 5.91 TOTAL - PORTLAND 8.14 148 23,678 2.10 1.89 2.20 2.16 2.37 3 TIGARD 7.61 ECL TO BEAVERTON-TIGARD HWY 144 1.04 47 51,845 2.38 2.93 3.20 3.15 3.37 8.65 HWY 144 TO BEAVERTON-TUALATIN HWY 141 /ORE217 .17 33 48,300 10.98 6.70 9.09 16.79 13.29 8.82 HWY 141 /ORE217 TO SW GARRETT ST 1.01 44 43.329 2.74 3.13 2.99 3.34 3.69 9.83 SW GARRETT ST TO SW MCDONALD AVE .53 38 42,000 4.66 3.72 2.99 4.30 2.91 10.36 SW MCDONALD AVE TO SW BULL MT ROAD .35 20 44,400 3.51 4.63 4.54 5.76 6.12 10.71 SW BULL MT ROAD TO SW DURHAM ROAD .78 38 44,400 2.99 4.12 2.65 3.48 3.41 TOTAL - TIGARD 3.88 220 45,959 3.38 3.64 3.44 4.33 4.13 i TIGARD TO TUALATIN 11.49 TIGARD TO TUALATIN .71 10 44,900 .85 1.85 1.31 1.86 1.06 TOTAL - TIGARD TO TUALATIN .71 10 44,900 .85 1.85 1.31 1.86 1.06 TUALATIN 12.20 NCL TO TUALATIN ROAD .39 4 44,900 .62 .70 .73 1.31 2.52 12.59 TUALATIN ROAD TO SCL .65 6 34,700 .72 .88 .81 .59 .48 TOTAL -TUALATIN 1.04 10 38,525 .68 .82 .78 .87 1.27 TUALATIN TO SHERWOOD 13.24 TUALATIN TO SHERWOOD 1.30 8 34,700 .48 .44 .29 .47 .42 TOTAL - TUALATIN TO SHERWOOD 1.30 8 34,700 .48 .44 .29 .47 .42 SHERWOOD 14.54 SHERWOOD NCL TO SIX CORNERS .69 12 36,166 1.31 .85 .55 1.48 1.28 a 15.23 SIX CORNERS TO MEINECKE ROAD .72 10 37,200 1.02 1.38 .60 .37 .99 15.95 MEINECKE TO SHERWOOD SCL .70 3 37,200 .31 .35 .12 .50 .25 TOTAL - SHERWOOD 2.11 25 36,861 .88 .86 .43 .80 .86 SHERWOOD TO NEWBERG 16.65 SHERWOOD TO YAMHILL COUNTY 3.22 19 34,575 .46 .31 .53 .31 .42 19.86 YAMHILL COUNTY TO NEWBERG 1.67 3 34,976 .14 .18 .33 .44 .19 TOTAL - SHERWOOD TO NEWBERG 4.89 22 34,712 .35 .27 .46 .35 .34 -A. .1 28 STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM CRASHES Table II shows the comparative five-year crash experience for freeways and non-freeways on the State Highway System, primary and secondary components, the respective rural and urban portions. Total lengths for the categories are shown for the new year only. TABLE II CRASHES PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 DESCRIPTION Miles Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate a TOTAL State Highway System 7,484.72 1.04 1.01 1.06 1.14 1.11 Freeways 759.42 0.41 0.41 0.35 0.43 0.40 Non-Freeways 6,725.30 1.58 1.53 1.67 1.74 1.70 Primary System 4,951.54 0.98 0.94 0.99 1.08 1.04 Freeways 743.28 0.39 0.39 0.33 0.41 0.39 Non-Freeways 4,208.26 1.60 1.53 1.70 1.77 1.72 Seconday System 2,533.18 1.41 1.40 1.46 1.52 1.47 Freeways 16.14 0.81 0.74 0.71 0.79 0.67 Non-Freeways 2,517.04 1.52 1.52 1.59 1.65 1.62 RURAL y State Highway System 6,800.01 0.61 0.65 0.61 0.63 0.61 Freeways 632.10 0.23 0.25 0.19 0.25 0.23 Non-Freeways 6,167.91 0.92 0.96 0.94 0.93 0.91 `"i . Primary System 4,439.90 0.54 0.57 0.53 0.55 0.53 Freeways 630.31 0.23 0.25 0.19 0.25 0.23 Non-Freeways 3,809.59 0.86 0.89 0.88 0.85 0.83 Secondary System 2,360.11 1.07 1.12 1.08 1.14 1.11 Freeways 1.79 0.85 0.34 0.25 0.28 0.16 Non-Freeways 2,358.32 1.08 1.14 1.11 1.17 1.14 URBAN State Highway System 684.71 1.91 1.75 1.98 2.17 2.09 Freeways 127.32 0.73 0.69 0.62 0.73 0.70 Non-Freeways 557.39 3.18 2.90 3.40 3.66 3.52 Primary System 511.64 1.88 1.72 1.95 2.17 2.07 Freeways 112.97 0.72 0.67 0.60 0.71 0.69 Non-Freeways 398.67 3.26 2.95 3.50 3.83 3.67 Secondary System 173.07 2.07 1.96 2.18 2.22 2.14 Freeways 14.35 0.81 0.82 0.79 0.88 0.76 Non-Freeways 158.72 2.87 2.67 2.98 2.97 2.93 RURAL includes both the Rural and Suburban shown in Table IV. COMPARATIVE CRASH RATES BY JURISDICTION 2001 The importance of rate comparisons in relation to components of the State Highway System is shown by the rates in Table IV. Crash rates tend to increase with population density, as shown below. TABLE IV RATE COMPARISON BY JURISDICTION Crash Fatality DESCRIPTION Miles* Vehicle-Miles* Crashes Fatalities Rate** Rate*** STATE HWY SYSTEM 7,484.72 20,529,083,733 21,304 288 1.04 1.40 Urban 684.71 6,698,455,624 12,808 54 1.91 0.81 Freeways 127.32 3,470,997,205 2,536 12 0.73 0.35 Non-Freeways 557.39 3,227,458,419 10,272 42 3.18 1.30 Suburban 168.54 2,357,480,562 1,576 18 0.67 0.76 Freeways 59.26 1,552,487,350 341 3 0.22 0.19 Non-Freeways 109.28 804,993,212 1,235 15 1.53 1.86 Rural 6,631.47 11,473,147,547 6,920 216 0.60 1.88 Freeways 572.84 4,558,025,100 1,078 28 0.24 0.61 Non-Freeways 6,058.63 6,915,122,447 5,842 188 0.84 2.72 PRIMARY HIGHWAYS 4,951.54 17,608,585,065 17,184 227 0.98 1.29 Urban 511.64 5,710,730,161 10,764 47 1.88 0.82 Freeways 112.97 3,088,114,760 2,227 11 0.72 0.36 Non-Freeways 398.67 2,622,615,401 8,537 36 3.26 1.37 Suburban 128.55 2,058,184,906 1,170 17 0.57 0.83 Freeways 57.47 1,482,832,940 282 3 0.19 0.20 Non-Freeways 71.08 575,351,966 888 14 1.54 2.43 Rural 4,311.35 9,839,669,998 5,250 163 0.53 1.66 Freeways 572.84 4,558,025,100 1,078 28 0.24 0.61 Non-Freeways 3,738.51 5,281,644,898 4,172 135 0.79 2.56 SECONDARY HIGHWAYS 2,533.18 2,920,498,668 4,120 61 1.41 2.09 Urban 173.07 987,725,463 2,044 7 2.07 0.71 Freeways 14.35 382,882,445 309 1 0.81 0.26 Non-Freeways 158.72 604,843,018 1,735 6 2.87 0.99 Suburban 39.99 299,295,656 406 1 1.36 0.33 Freeways 1.79 69,654,410 59 0 0.85 0.00 Non-Freeways 38.20 229,641,246 347 1 1.51 0.44 Rural 2,320.12 1,633,477,549 1,670 53 1.02 3.24 Freeways Non-Freeways 2,320.12 1,633,477,549 1,670 53 1.02 3.24 * Data is not included for frontage roads, ramps and connections. Ii ** rraah ratac per nna million %iahirlP milac. *** Fatality rates per 100 million vehicle miles. 9 T� t 3 _.t Appendix E Year 2004 Total Traffic Level-of- Service Worksheets 4 am Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:29:17 Page 1-1 am Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:29:17 Page 2-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project#: 5799 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project#: 5799 Tigard Oil Change Facility Tigard Oil Change Facility 2004 Total Traffic Conditions - Weekday AM Peak Hour 2004 Total Traffic Conditions - Weekday AM Peak Hour Scenario Report Trip Generation Report (Scenario: am Command: am Forecast for am Volume: am Zone Rate Rate Trips Trips Total % Of Geometry: am # Subzone Amount Units In Out In Out Trips Total Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: am Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution Paths: Default Paths 1 1.00 Oil Change 5.00 5.00 5 5 10 66.7 1Routes: Default Routes Zone 1 Subtotal 5 5 10 66.7 Configuration: Default Configuration 2 1.00 Car Wash 5.00 0.00 5 0 5 33.3 Zone 2 Subtotal 5 0 5 33.3 3 1.00 Detail Shop 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.0 TOTAL 10 5 15 100.0 1 Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 S i WSAM.OUT 1-23-103 12:29p Page 1 of 9 am Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:29:17 Page 3-1 am Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:29:17 Page 4-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project#: 5799 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project#: 5799 Tigard Oil Change Facility Tigard Oil Change Facility I 2004 Total Traffic Conditions - Weekday AM Peak Hour 2004 Total Traffic Conditions - Weekday AM Peak Hour Trip Distribution Report Turning Movement Report am f Percent Of Trips pm Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total To Gates Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume 1 2 Zone #5 Pacific Hwy/Site Access#1 Base 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 1719 0 0 906 6 2636 1 70.0 30.0 Added 0 0 0 2 0 4 7 0 0 0 0 3 16 2 70.0 30.0 Total 0 0 0 3 0 6 9 1719 0 0 906 9 2652 I 3 70.0 30.0 #6 Pacific Hwy/Tigard MkPI Base 51 0 83 0 0 1 2 1679 43 50 860 1 2770 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 5 Total 51 0 83 0 0 1 2 1681 43 50 863 1 2775 1 Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 WSAM.OUT 1-23-103 12:29p Page 2 of 9 am Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:29:18 Page 5-1 am Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:29:18 Page 6-1 I Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project#: 5799 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project#: 5799 Tigard Oil Change Facility Tigard Oil Change Facility I 2004 Total Traffic Conditions - Weekday AM Peak Hour 2004 Total Traffic Conditions - Weekday AM Peak Hour Intersection Volume Report Intersection Volume Report Base Volume Alternative Future Volume Alternative Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Node Intersection L -- T -- R L -- I -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R Node Intersection L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- I -- R L -- T -- R 5 Pacific Hwy/S 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 1719 0 0 906 6 5 Pacific Hwy/S 0 0 0 3 0 6 9 1719 0 0 906 9 6 Pacific Hwy/T 51 0 83 0 0 1 2 1679 43 50 860 1 6 Pacific Hwy/T 51 0 83 0 0 1 2 1681 43 50 863 1 Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. S 1 $ i WSAM.OUT 1-23-103 12:29p Page 3 of 9 am Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:29:18 Page 7-1 am Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:29:18 Page 8-1 I 1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project#: 5799 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project#: 5799 Tigard Oil Change Facility Tigard Oil Change Facility 2004 Total Traffic Conditions - Weekday AM Peak Hour 2004 Total Traffic Conditions - Weekday AM Peak Hour Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection Base Future Change Intersection #5 Pacific Hwy/Site Access#1 Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in ************************,r*************,r***************************************** LOS Veh C LOS Veh C Average Delay (sec/veh): 30.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: D # 5 Pacific Hwy/Site Access#1 D 30.1 0.000 D 31.7 0.000 + 0.000 V/C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound # 6 Pacific Hwy/Tigard MkPI A 7.6 0.635 A 7.6 0.636 + 0.002 D/V Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: I Stop Sign II Stop Sign II Uncontrolled II Uncontrolled ' Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 BaseVol Volume Module: 0 0 0II 1 0 2II 2 1719 0II 0 906 6I Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 1719 0 0 906 6 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 1868 0 0 985 7 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 1868 0 0 985 7 Critical Gap'Module: II II II Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: II II II I Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1927 xxxx 496 991 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 60 xxxx 525 699 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 60 xxxx 525 699 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: II II II I Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 66.5 xxxx 11.9 10.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * F * B B Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx 30.1 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * D * * Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. S 1 i i '4 WSAM.OUT 1-23-103 12:29p Page 4 of 9 am Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:29:18 Page 9-1 am Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:29:18 Page 10-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project#: 5799 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project#: 5799 Tigard Oil Change Facility Tigard Oil Change Facility 2004 Total Traffic Conditions - Weekday AM Peak Hour 2004 Total Traffic Conditions - Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) Base Volume Alternative ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Pacific Hwy/Site Access#1 Intersection #5 Pacific Hwy/Site Access#1 ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 31.7 Worst Case Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ******************************************************************************** Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R HevVeh: 0% I 0% I 1% I 9% ( () II II Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0% Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Peds/Hour: 0 0 0 0 Rights: Include Include Include Include Pedestrian Walk Speed: 4.00 feet/sec Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 LaneWidth: 12 feet 12 feet 12 feet 12 feet 11 1 Time Period: 0.25 hour Volume ModuleI II Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 1719 0 0 906 6 Upstream Signals: I ( ' I Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Link Index: #12 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 1719 0 0 906 6 Dist(miles): 0.000 Added Vol: 0 0 0 2 0 4 7 0 0 0 0 3 Speed (mph): 0.00 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Signallndex: #6 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 3 0 6 9 1719 0 0 906 9 Cycle Time: 0 secs User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 InitVolume: 0 0 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Saturation: 0 0 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 3 0 7 10 1868 0 0 985 10 ArrivalType: 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G/C: 0.00 0.00 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 3 0 7 10 1868 0 0 985 10 *** Computation 1: Time for Queue to Clear at Each Upstream Intersection Critical Gap Module: P: 0.000 0.000 Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx gq1: 0.00 0.00 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx gq2: 0.00 0.00 gq: 0.00 0.00 Capacity Module: I *** Computation 2: Time Intersection Blocked Because of Upstream Platoons Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1943 xxxx 497 995 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx alpha: 0.000 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 58 xxxx 524 697 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx beta: 0.000 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 58 xxxx 524 697 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx to (secs): 0.000 11 11 11 1 1F: 0.000 Level Of Service Module: f: 0.000 0.000 Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 71.2 xxxx 12.0 10.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx vcmax: 0 0 LOS by Move: * * * F * B B * * * * vcmin: 0 0 Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT tp: 0.0 0.0 Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx p: 0.000 Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx *** Computation 3: Platoon Event Periods Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * pdom/psubo: 0.000/0.000/Unconstrained ApproachDel: xxxxxx 31.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx *** Computation 4: Conflicting Flows During Each Unblocked Period ApproachLOS: * D * * InitCnflVol: 0 0 0 1927 0 496 991 xxxxx xxxxx 0 xxxxx xxxxx UpstreamSat: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 xxxxx xxxxx 0 xxxxx xxxxx UpstreamAdj:1.00 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.000 1.00 x.xxx x.xxx 1.00 x.xxx x.xxx ConflictVol: 0 0 0 1927 0 496 991 xxxxx xxxxx 0 xxxxx xxxxx *** Computation 5: Capactiy for Subject Movement During Unblocked Period InitPotCap: 0 0 0 60 0 525 699 xxxxx xxxxx 0 xxxxx xxxxx UpstreamAdj:1.00 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.000 1.00 x.xxx x.xxx 1.00 x.xxx x.xxx PotentCap: 0 0 0 60 0 525 699 xxxxx xxxxx 0 xxxxx xxxxx Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. S WSAM.OUT 1-23-103 12:29p Page 5 of 9 am Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:29:18 Page 11-1 am Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:29:18 Page 12-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project#: 5799 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project#: 5799 Tigard Oil Change Facility Tigard Oil Change Facility 2004 Total Traffic Conditions - Weekday AM Peak Hour 2004 Total Traffic Conditions - Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Base Volume Alternative ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Pacific Hwy/Tigard MkPI Intersection #5 Pacific Hwy/Site Access#1 ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.635 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 7.6 Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Optimal Cycle: 52 Level Of Service: A I ******************************************************************************** HevVeh: 0% I 0% I 1% I 9% I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0% Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Peds/Hour: 0 0 0 0 I II II II Pedestrian Walk Speed: 4.00 feet/sec Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected LaneWidth: 12 feet 12 feet 12 feet 12 feet Rights: Ovl Include Ovl Include Time Period: 0.25 hour Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Upstream Signals: I I I I I II II II I Link Index: #12 Volume Module: Dist(miles): 0.000 Base Vol: 51 0 83 0 0 1 2 1679 43 50 860 1 Speed (mph): 0.00 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Signallndex: #6 Initial Bse: 51 0 83 0 0 1 2 1679 43 50 860 1 Cycle Time: 0 secs User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 InitVolume: 0 0 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Saturation: 0 0 PHF Volume: 55 0 90 0 0 1 2 1825 47 54 935 1 ArrivalType: 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G/C: 0.00 0.00 Reduced Vol: 55 0 90 0 0 1 2 1825 47 54 935 1 *** Computation 1: Time for Queue to Clear at Each Upstream Intersection PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P: 0.000 0.000 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 gq1: 0.00 0.00 Final Vol.: 55 0 90 0 0 1 2 1825 47 54 935 1 gq2: 0.00 0.00 I II II II I gq: 0.00 0.00 Saturation F ow Module: *** Computation 2: Time Intersection Blocked Because of Upstream Platoons Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 alpha: 0.000 Adjustment: 0.94 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.94 0.94 0.84 0.87 0.87 0.87 beta: 0.000 Lanes: 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 to (secs): 0.000 Final Sat.: 3556 0 1583II 0 0 1644II1787 3574 1599II1655 3307 4I � F: 0.000 f: 0.000 0.000 Capacity Analysis Module: vcmax: 0 0 Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.03 0.03 0.28 0.28 vcmin: 0 0 Crit Moves: **** **** **** tp: 0.0 0.0 Green/Cycle: 0.02 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.80 0.80 0.05 0.85 0.85 p: 0.000 Volume/Cap: 0.64 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.33 0.64 0.04 0.64 0.33 0.33 *** Computation 3: Platoon Event Periods Delay/Veh: 62.7 0.0 67.7 0.0 0.0 47.9 77.2 4.4 2.0 61.2 1.6 1.6 pdom/psubo: 0.000/0.000/Unconstrained User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 *** Computation 4: Conflicting Flows During Each Unblocked Period AdjDel/Veh: 62.7 0.0 67.7 0.0 0.0 47.9 77.2 4.4 2.0 61.2 1.6 1.6 InitCnflVol: 0 0 0 1927 0 496 991 xxxxx xxxxx 0 xxxxx xxxxx DesignQueue: 3 0 5 0 0 0 0 23 1 3 8 0 UpstreamSat: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 xxxxx xxxxx 0 xxxxx xxxxx ******************************************************************************** UpstreamAdj:1.00 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.000 1.00 x.xxx x.xxx 1.00 x.xxx x.xxx ConflictVol: 0 0 0 1927 0 496 991 xxxxx xxxxx 0 xxxxx xxxxx *** Computation 5: Capactiy for Subject Movement During Unblocked Period InitPotCap: 0 0 0 60 0 525 699 xxxxx xxxxx 0 xxxxx xxxxx UpstreamAdj:1.00 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.000 1.00 x.xxx x.xxx 1.00 x.xxx x.xxx PotentCap: 0 0 0 60 0 525 699 xxxxx xxxxx 0 xxxxx xxxxx Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. S WSAM.OUT 1-23-103 12:29p Page 6 of 9 am Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:29:18 Page 13-1 am Thu Jan $3, 2003 12:29:18 Page 13-2 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project#: 5799 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project#: 5799 Tigard Oil Change Facility Tigard Oil Change Facility 2004 Total Traffic Conditions - Weekday AM Peak Hour 2004 Total Traffic Conditions - Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (Permitted Left Turn Sat Adj) 2000 HCM Operations Method 2000 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Base Volume Alternative ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Pacific Hwy/Tigard MkPl Intersection #6 Pacific Hwy/Tigard MkPI ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North South East West Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Cycle Length, C: 100 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx I III II I Actual Green Time Per lane Group, G: 2.45 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Effective Green Time Per Lane Group, g: 2.45 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Lanes: 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Opposing Effective Green Time, go: 2.45 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Lane Group: LT LT R xxxx xxxx R L T R L RT RT Number Of Opposing Lanes, No: 0 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx #LnsinGrps: 2 2 1 0 0 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 Number Of Lanes In Lane Group, N: 2 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx II II II I Adjusted Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt: 55 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx HCM Ops input Saturation Adj Module: Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Plt: 1.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Proportion of Left Turns in Opp Flow, Plto: 1.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx CrosswalkWid 8 8 8 8 Left Turns Per Cycle, LTC: 1.54 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx % Hev Veh: 2 0 1 9 Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo: 0 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0% Opposing Flow Per Lane Per Cycle, Volc: 0.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Parking/Hr: No No No No Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo: 1.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Lost Time Per Phase, tl: 4.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Eff grn until arrival of left-turn car, gf: 0.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Opposing Queue Ratio, qro: 0.98 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include Eff grn blocked by opposing queue, gq: 0.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx % RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 Eff grn while left turns filter thru, gu: 2.45 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx II II II I Max opposing cars arriving during gq-gf, n: 0.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx HCM Ops f(lt1 Adj Case Module: Proportion of Opposing Thru & RT cars, ptho: 0.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx f(lt) Case: 5 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx Left-turn Saturation Factor, fs: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx I II II II I Proportion of Left Turns in Shared Lane, pl: 1.41 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: Through-car Equivalents, ell: 1.40 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Single Lane Through-car Equivalents, e12: 1.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Hev Veh Adj: 0.98 xxxx 0.98 xxxx xxxx 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.92 0.92 0.92 Minimum Left Turn Adjustment Factor, fmin: 1.96 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Grade Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Single Lane Left Turn Adjustment Factor, fm: 1.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Parking Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Left Turn Adjustment Factor, flt: 0.96 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Bus Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 ******************************************************************************** iArea Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RT Adj: xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.87 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx 1.00 1.00 LT Adj: 0.96 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCM Sat Adj: 0.94 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.94 0.99 0.84 0.87 0.92 0.92 Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Fnl Sat Adj: 0.94 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.94 0.94 0.84 0.87 0.87 0.87 I II Delay Adjustment Factor Module: II II Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > DelAdjFctr: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. S WSAM.OUT 1-23-103 12:29p Page 7 of 9 _ I am Thu Jan 23,2003 12:29:18 Page 14-1 am Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:29:18 Page 15-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project#: 5799 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project#: 5799 Tigard Oil Change Facility Tigard Oil Change Facility 2004 Total Traffic Conditions - Weekday AM Peak Hour 2004 Total Traffic Conditions - Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Operations Method ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative Intersection #6 Pacific Hwy/Tigard MkPI ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Pacific Hwy/Tigard MkPI Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.636 ******************************************************************************** Loss Time (sec;): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 7.6 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Optimal Cycle: 52 Level Of Service: A Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ******************************************************************************** I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: II II i Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Lanes: 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 I II II II I Lane Group: LT LT R xxxx xxxx R L T R L RT RT Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected #LnslnGrps: 2 2 1 0 0 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 Rights: Ovl Include Ovl Include II I Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HCM Ops Input Saturation AdjlModule: II Lanes: 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 CrosswalkWid 8 8 8 8 Volume Module: II II II % Hev Veh: 2 0 1 9 Base Vol: 51 0 83 0 0 1 2 1679 43 50 860 1 Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0% Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking/Hr: No No No No Initial Bse: 51 0 83 0 0 1 2 1679 43 50 860 1 Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 51 0 83 0 0 1 2 1681 43 50 863 1 ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 % RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 II II II 1 PHF Volume: 55 0 90 0 0 1 2 1827 47 54 938 1 HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module: Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f(lt) Case: 5 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx Reduced Vol: 55 0 90 0 0 1 2 1827 47 54 938 1 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCM Ops SaturationII I: II Adj Module: MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 55 0 90 0 0 1 2 1827 47 54 938 1 Hev Veh Adj: 0.98 xxxx 0.98 xxxx xxxx 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.92 0.92 0.92 Grade Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Saturation Flow Module: II II II I Parking Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Bus Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 ( Adjustment: 0.94 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.94 0.94 0.84 0.87 0.87 0.87 Area Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 RT Adj: xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.87 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3556 0 1583 0 0 16441787 3574 15991655 3307 4LT Adj: 0.96 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx II II II I PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Capacity Analysis Module: HCM Sat Adj: 0.94 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.94 0.99 0.84 0.87 0.92 0.92 Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.03 0.03 0.28 0.28 Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** MLF Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Green/Cycle: 0.02 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.80 0.80 0.05 0.85 0.85 Fnl Sat Adj: 0.94 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.94 0.94 0.84 0.87 0.87 0.87 Volume/Cap: 0.64 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.33 0.64 0.04 0.64 0.33 0.33 III II II I Delay/Veh: 62.8 0.0 67.8 0.0 0.0 47.9 77.4 4.4 2.0 61.3 1.6 1.6 Delay Adjustment Factor Module: User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AdjDel/Veh: 62.8 0.0 67.8 0.0 0.0 47.9 77.4 4.4 2.0 61.3 1.6 1.6 Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > DesignOueue: 3 0 5 0 0 0 0 23 1 3 8 0 DelAdjFctr: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. WSAM.OUT 1-23-103 12:29p Page 8 of 9 _:.._. am Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:29:18 Page 15-2 I Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project#: 5799 Tigard Oil Change Facility 2004 Total Traffic Conditions - Weekday AM Peak Hour Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (Permitted Left Turn Sat Adj) 2000 HCM Operations Method Future Volume Alternative ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Pacific Hwy/Tigard MkPl ******************************************************************************** Approach: North South East West Cycle Length, C: 100 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Actual Green Time Per Lane Group, G: 2.45 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Effective Green Time Per Lane Group, g: 2.45 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Opposing Effective Green Time, go: 2.45 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Number Of Opposing Lanes, No: 0 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Number Of Lanes In Lane Group, N: 2 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Adjusted Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt: 55 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Plt: 1.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Proportion of Left Turns in Opp Flow, Plto: 1.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Left Turns Per Cycle, LTC: 1.54 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo: 0 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Opposing Flow Per Lane Per Cycle, Volc: 0.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo: 1.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Lost Time Per Phase, tl: 4.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Eff grn until arrival of left-turn car, gf: 0.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Opposing Queue Ratio, qro: 0.98 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Eff grn blocked by opposing queue, gq: 0.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Eff grn while left turns filter thru, gu: 2.45 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Max opposing czars arriving during gq-gf, n: 0.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Proportion of Opposing Thru & RT cars, ptho: 0.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Left-turn Saturation Factor, fs: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Proportion of Left Turns in Shared Lane, pl: 1.41 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Through-car Equivalents, ell: 1.40 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Single Lane Through-car Equivalents, el2: 1.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Minimum Left Turn Adjustment Factor, fmin: 1.97 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Single Lane Left Turn Adjustment Factor, fm: 1.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Left Turn Adjustment Factor, flt: 0.96 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. S 1 WSAM.OUT 1-23-103 12:29p Page 9 of 9 • M..�. �... I pm Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:36:16 Page 1-1 pm Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:36:16 Page 2-1 ! Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project #:5799 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project #:5799 Tigard Oil Change Facility Tigard Oil Change Facility 2004 Total Traffic Conditions - Weekday PM Peak Hour 2004 Total Traffic Conditions - Weekday PM Peak Hour Scenario Report Trip Generation Report Scenario: pm Command: Forecast for pm Pm Volume: pm Zone Rate Rate Trips Trips Total % Of Geometry: pm # Subzone Amount Units In Out In Out Trips Total Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: pm Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution Paths: Default Paths 1 1.00 Oil Change 5.00 5.00 5 5 10 50.0 Routes: Default Routes Zone 1 Subtotal 5 5 10 50.0 Configuration: Default Configuration 2 1.00 Car Wash 5.00 0.00 5 0 5 25.0 Zone 2 Subtotal 5 0 5 25.0 3 1.00 Detail Shop 0.00 5.00 0 5 5 25.0 Zone 3 Subtotal 0 5 5 25.0 TOTAL 10 10 20 100.0 Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. S 1 WSPM.OUT 1-23-103 12:36p Page 1 of 9 pm Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:36:16 Page 3-1 pm Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:36:16 Page 4-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project #:5799 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project #:5799 Tigard Oil Change Facility Tigard Oil Change Facility 2004 Total Traffic Conditions - Weekday PM Peak Hour 2004 Total Traffic Conditions - Weekday PM Peak Hour Trip Distribution Report Turning Movement Report IIPm Percent Of Trips pm Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total To Gates Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume 1 2 Zone #5 Pacific Hwy/Site Access#1 Base 0 0 0 2 0 3 1 1357 0 0 1829 4 3196 1 70.0 30.0 Added 0 0 0 3 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 3 20 2 70.0 30.0 Total 0 0 0 5 0 10 8 1357 0 0 1829 7 3216 3 70.0 30.0 #6 Pacific Hwy/Tigard MkPl Base 97 0 77 1 0 5 10 1283 65 82 1730 5 3355 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 6 Total 97 0 77 1 0 5 10 1286 65 82 1733 5 3361 1 Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. i WSPN.OUT 1-23-103 12:36p Page 2 of 9 pm Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:36:16 Page 5-1 pm Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:36:16 Page 6-1 1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project #:5799 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project #:5799 Tigard Oil Change Facility Tigard Oil Change Facility 2004 Total Traffic Conditions - Weekday PM Peak Hour 2004 Total Traffic Conditions - Weekday PM Peak Hour Intersection Volume Report Intersection Volume Report IBase Volume Alternative Future Volume Alternative Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Node Intersection L -- I -- R L -- T -- R L -- I -- R L -- T -- R Node Intersection L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- T -- R L -- I -- R 5 Pacific Hwy/S 0 0 0 2 0 3 1 1357 0 0 1829 4 5 Pacific Hwy/S 0 0 0 5 0 10 8 1357 0 0 1829 7 6 Pacific Hwy/T 97 0 77 1 0 5 10 1283 65 82 1730 5 6 Pacific Hwy/T 97 0 77 1 0 5 10 1286 65 82 1733 5 l li Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 $ z WSPN.OUT 1-23-103 12:36p Page 3 of 9 t.- Pm Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:36:16 Page 7-1 pm Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:36:16 Page 8-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project #:5799 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project #:5799 Tigard Oil Change Facility Tigard Oil Change Facility 2004 Total Traffic Conditions - Weekday PM Peak Hour 2004 Total Traffic Conditions - Weekday PM Peak Hour Impact Analysis Report P Y P Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection Base Future Change Intersection #5 Pacific Hwy/Site Access#1 Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in ******************************************************************************** LOS Veh C LOS Veh C Average Delay (sec/veh): 84.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: F # 5 Pacific Hwy/Site Access#1 F 84.9 0.000 F 87.0 0.000 + 0.000 V/C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound # 6 Pacific Hwy/Tigard MkPl A 7.9 0.607 A 7.9 0.608 + 0.001 D/V Movement: L - T - R L - I - R L - I - R L - I - R I Control: I Stop Sign II Stop Sign II Uncontrolled II Uncontrolled I Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 Volume Module: II II II Base Vol: 0 0 0 2 0 3 1 1357 0 0 1829 4 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 2 0 3 1 1357 0 0 1829 4 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 2 0 3 1 1385 0 0 1866 4 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 2 0 3 1 1385 0 0 1866 4 Critical Gap'Module: II II II I Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 4.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx II II l I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 2563 xxxx 935 1870 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 22 xxxx 271 314 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 22 xxxx 271 314 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Level Of Service Module: II II II I Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 184.5 xxxx 18.5 16.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ILOS by Move: * * * F * C C * * * * f Movement: LT LTR RT LT LTR RT LT LTR RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx 84.9 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * F * * Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. WSPN.OUT 1-23-103 12:36p Page 4 of 9 pm Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:36:16 Page 9-1 pm Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:36:16 Page 10-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project #:5799 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project #:5799 Tigard Oil Change Facility Tigard Oil Change Facility 2004 Total Traffic Conditions - Weekday PM Peak Hour 2004 Total Traffic Conditions - Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) Base Volume Alternative ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Pacific Hwy/Site Access#1 Intersection #5 Pacific Hwy/Site Access#1 ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 87.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: F Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ******************************************************************************** Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R HevVeh: 0% I 0% I 3% I 2% ! Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0% Control: ( Stop Sign II Stop Sign (1 Uncontrolled II Uncontrolled Peds/Hour: 0 0 0 0 Rights: Include Include Include Include Pedestrian Walk Speed: 4.00 feet/sec Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 LaneWidth: 12 feet 12 feet 12 feet 12 feet Time Period: 0.25 hour Volume Module: II II II 1 Base Vol: 0 0 0 2 0 3 1 1357 0 0 1829 4 Upstream Signals: I I I I Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Link Index: #12 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 2 0 3 1 1357 0 0 1829 4 Dist(miles): 0.000 Added Vol: 0 0 0 3 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 3 Speed (mph): 0.00 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SignalIndex: #6 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 5 0 10 8 1357 0 0 1829 7 Cycle Time: 0 secs User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 InitVolume: 0 0 PHF Adj: 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Saturation: 0 0 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 5 0 10 8 1385 0 0 1866 7 ArrivalType: 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G/C: 0.00 0.00 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 5 0 10 8 1385 0 0 1866 7 *** Computation 1: Time for Queue to Clear at Each Upstream Intersection Critical Gap Module: P: 0.000 0.000 Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 4.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx gq1: 0.00 0.00 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx gq2: 0.00 0.00 I II II II 1 Qq: 0.00 0.00 Capacity Module: *** Computation 2: Time Intersection Blocked Because of Upstream Platoons Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 2579 xxxx 937 1873 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx alpha: 0.000 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 22 xxxx 270 313 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx beta: 0.000 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 21 xxxx 270 313 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx to (secs): 0.000 F: 0.000 Level Of ServiceIII II I Module: f: 0.000 0.000 Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 223.3 xxxx 18.9 16.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx vcmax: 0 0 LOS by Move: * * * F * C C * * * * * vcmin: 0 0 Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT tp: 0.0 0.0 Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx p: 0.000 Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx *** Computation 3: Platoon Event Periods Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * pdom/psubo: 0.000/0.000/Unconstrained ApproachDel: xxxxxx 87.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx *** Computation 4: Conflicting Flows During Each Unblocked Period ApproachLOS: * F * * InitCnflVol: 0 0 0 2563 0 935 1870 xxxxx xxxxx 0 xxxxx xxxxx UpstreamSat: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 xxxxx xxxxx 0 xxxxx xxxxx UpstreamAdj:1.00 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.000 1.00 x.xxx x.xxx 1.00 x.xxx x.xxx ConflictVol: 0 0 0 2563 0 935 1870 xxxxx xxxxx 0 xxxxx xxxxx *** Computation 5: Capactiy for Subject Movement During Unblocked Period InitPotCap: 0 0 0 22 0 271 314 xxxxx xxxxx 0 xxxxx xxxxx UpstreamAdj:1.00 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.000 1.00 x.xxx x.xxx 1.00 x.xxx x.xxx PotentCap: 0 0 0 22 0 271 314 xxxxx xxxxx 0 xxxxx xxxxx Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 S S WSPM.OUT 1-23-103 12:36p Page 5 of 9 4_ _ .• y • pm Thu Jan 23 2003 12:36:16 Page 11-1 pm Thu Jan 23 2003 12:36:16 Page 12-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project #:5799 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project #:5799 Tigard Oil Change Facility Tigard Oil Change Facility 2004 Total Traffic Conditions - Weekday PM Peak Hour 2004 Total Traffic Conditions - Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Base Volume Alternative ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Pacific Hwy/Tigard MkPl Intersection #5 Pacific Hwy/Site Access#1 ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.607 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 7.9 Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Optimal Cycle: 49 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** HevVeh: I 0% 0% I 3% ( 2% I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound 1 Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0% Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Peds/Hour: 0 0 0 0 I II II II Pedestrian Walk Speed: 4.00 feet/sec Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected LaneWidth: 12 feet 12 feet 12 feet 12 feet Rights: Ovl Include Ovl Include Time Period: 0.25 hour Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Upstream Signals: Link Index: #12 Volume Module: II II II Dist(miles): 0.000 Base Vol: 97 0 77 1 0 5 10 1283 65 82 1730 5 Speed (mph): 0.00 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 SignalIndex: #6 Initial Bse: 97 0 77 1 0 5 10 1283 65 82 1730 5 Cycle Time: 0 secs User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 InitVolume: 0 0 PHF Adj: 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Saturation: 0 0 PHF Volume: 99 0 79 1 0 5 10 1309 66 84 1765 5 ArrivalType: 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C/C: 0.00 0.00 Reduced Vol: 99 0 79 1 0 5 10 1309 66 84 1765 5 *** Computation 1: Time for Queue to Clear at Each Upstream Intersection PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P: 0.000 0.000 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 gql: 0.00 0.00 Final Vol.: 99 0 79II 1 0 5II 10 1309 66II 84 1765 5I gq2: 0.00 0.00 gq: 0.00 0.00 Saturation Flow Module: *** Computation 2: Time Intersection Blocked Because of Upstream Platoons Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 alpha: 0.000 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.84 0.71 1.00 0.71 0.92 0.92 0.83 0.93 0.93 0.93 beta: 0.000 Lanes: 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.17 0.00 0.83 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 to (secs): 0.000 Final Sat.: 3593 0 1599II 226 0 1128II1753 3505 1568II1769 3528 10I F: 0.000 f: 0.000 0.000 Capacity Analysis Module: vcmax: 0 0 Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.37 0.04 0.05 0.50 0.50 vcmin: 0 0 Crit Moves: **** **** **** tp: 0.0 0.0 Green/Cycle: 0.05 0.00 0.14 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.01 0.74 0.74 0.09 0.82 0.82 p: 0.000 Volume/Cap: 0.61 0.00 0.35 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.61 0.50 0.06 0.50 0.61 0.61 *** Computation 3: Platoon Event Periods Delay/Veh: 53.3 0.0 39.9 46.5 0.0 46.5 99.5 5.5 3.5 45.6 3.4 3.4 pdom/psubo: 0.000/0.000/Unconstrained User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 *** Computation 4: Conflicting Flows During Each Unblocked Period AdjDel/Veh: 53.3 0.0 39.9 46.5 0.0 46.5 99.5 5.5 3.5 45.6 3.4 3.4 InitCnflVol: 0 0 0 2563 0 935 1870 xxxxx xxxxx 0 xxxxx xxxxx DesignQueue: 5 0 4 0 0 0 1 21 1 4 20 0 UpstreamSat: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 xxxxx xxxxx 0 xxxxx xxxxx ******************************************************************************** UpstreamAdj:1.00 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.000 1.00 x.xxx x.xxx 1.00 x.xxx x.xxx ConflictVol: 0 0 0 2563 0 935 1870 xxxxx xxxxx 0 xxxxx xxxxx *** Computation 5: Capactiy for Subject Movement During Unblocked Period InitPotCap: 0 0 0 22 0 271 314 xxxxx xxxxx 0 xxxxx xxxxx UpstreamAdj:1.00 1.000 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.000 1.00 x.xxx x.xxx 1.00 x.xxx x.xxx PotentCap: 0 0 0 22 0 271 314 xxxxx xxxxx 0 xxxxx xxxxx Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. S i WSPM.OUT 1-23-103 12:36p Page 6 of 9 pm Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:36:16 Page 13-1 pm Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:36:16 Page 13-2 Kittetson & Associates, Inc. - Project #:5799 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project #:5799 Tigard Oil Change Facility Tigard Oil Change Facility 2004 Total Traffic Conditions - Weekday PM Peak Hour 2004 Total Traffic Conditions - Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (Permitted Left Turn Sat Adj) 1 2000 HCM Operations Method 2000 HCM Operations Method i Base Volume Alternative Base Volume Alternative ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Pacific Hwy/Tigard MkPl Intersection #6 Pacific Hwy/Tigard MkPI ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North South East West Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Cycle Length, C: 100 100 xxxxxx xxxxxx I II II 11 1 Actual Green Time Per Lane Group, G: 4.54 4.54 xxxxxx xxxxxx lHCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Effective Green Time Per Lane Group, g: 4.54 4.54 xxxxxx xxxxxx i Lanes: 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Opposing Effective Green Time, go: 4.54 4.54 xxxxxx xxxxxx Lane Group: LT LT R LTR LTR LTR L T R L RT RT Number Of Opposing Lanes, No: 1 1 xxxxxx xxxxxx #LnslnGrps: 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 Number Of Lanes In Lane Group, N: 2 1 xxxxxx xxxxxx II 1I II I Adjusted Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt: 99 1 xxxxxx xxxxxx HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Plt: 1.00 0.17 xxxxxx xxxxxx Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Proportion of Left Turns in Opp Flow, Plto: 0.17 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx CrosswalkWid 8 8 8 8 Left Turns Per Cycle, LTC: 2.75 0.03 xxxxxx xxxxxx Hev Veh: 1 17 3 2 Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo: 6 0 xxxxxx xxxxxx Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0% Opposing Flow Per Lane Per Cycle, Volc: 0.17 0.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx Parking/Hr: No No No No Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo: 1.00 1.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Lost Time Per Phase, tl: 4.00 4.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Eff grn until arrival of left-turn car, gf: 0.00 0.14 xxxxxx xxxxxx Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Opposing Queue Ratio, qro: 0.95 0.95 xxxxxx xxxxxx ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include Eff grn blocked by opposing queue, gq: 0.00 0.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx % RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 Eff grn while left turns filter thru, gu: 4.54 4.40 xxxxxx xxxxxx II II II a Max opposing cars arriving during gq-gf, n: 0.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module: Proportion of Opposing Thru & RT cars, ptho: 0.83 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx f(lt) Case: 5 xxxx xxxx 5 xxxx 5 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx Left-turn Saturation Factor, fs: xxxxxx 0.88 xxxxxx xxxxxx I II II II a Proportion of Left Turns in Shared Lane, pl: 1.61 0.17 xxxxxx xxxxxx HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: Through-car Equivalents, ell: 1.41 1.40 xxxxxx xxxxxx Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Single lane Through-car Equivalents, el2: 1.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Hev Veh Adj: 0.99 xxxx 0.99 0.86 xxxx 0.86 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.98 0.98 0.98 Minimum Left Turn Adjustment Factor, fmin: 1.15 0.52 xxxxxx xxxxxx Grade Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Single Lane Left Turn Adjustment Factor, fm: 1.00 0.94 xxxxxx xxxxxx Parking Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Left Turn Adjustment Factor, flt: 0.96 0.94 xxxxxx xxxxxx Bus Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 ******************************************************************************** i Area Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ; RT Adj: xxxx xxxx 0.85 0.89 xxxx 0.89 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx 1.00 1.00 LT Adj: 0.96 xxxx xxxxx 0.94 xxxx 0.94 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 1.00 0.84 0.71 1.00 0.71 0.92 0.97 0.83 0.93 0.98 0.98 Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Fnl Sat Adj: 0.95 1.00 0.841 0.71 1.00 0.71 0.92 0.92 0.83 0.93 0.93 0.93 Delay Adjustment Factor Module: II II Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > DelAdjFctr: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. S 4 4 WSPM.OUT 1-23-103 12:36p Page 7 of 9 ' pm Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:36:16 Page 14-1 pm Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:36:16 Page 15-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project #:5799 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project #:5799 Tigard Oil Change Facility Tigard Oil Change Facility 2.004 Total Traffic Conditions - Weekday PM Peak Hour 2004 Total Traffic Conditions - Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report ) 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) 2000 HCM Operations Method ******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative Intersection #6 Pacific Hwy/Tigard MkPI ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Pacific Hwy/Tigard MkPI Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.608 ******************************************************************************** Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 7.9 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Optimal Cycle: 49 Level Of Service: A Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ******************************************************************************** I I I Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: II II i Movement: L - T - R L - T - R I - T - R L - T - R Lanes: 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group: LT LT R LTR LTR LTR L T R L RT RT Control: I Permitted II Permitted II Protected II Protected #LnslnGrps: 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 Rights: Ovl Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj lModule: II II Lanes: 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 CrosswalkWid 8 8 8 8 Volume Module: II II II ( % Hev Veh: 1 17 3 2 Base Vol: 97 0 77 1 0 5 10 1283 65 82 1730 5 Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0% Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking/Hr: No No No No Initial Bse: 97 0 77 1 0 5 10 1283 65 82 1730 5 Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 97 0 77 1 0 5 10 1286 65 82 1733 5 ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 % RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 PHF Adj: 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98I 11 II II PHF Volume: 99 0 79 1 0 5 10 1312 66 84 1768 5 HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module: Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f(lt) Case: I 5 xxxx xxxxll 5 xxxx 5I� 1 xxxx xxxx�l 1 xxxx xxxx) Reduced Vol: 99 0 79 1 0 5 10 1312 66 84 1768 5 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 In Wid Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 99 0 79 1 0 5II 10 1312 66II 84 1768 5I Hev Veh Adj: 0.99 xxxx 0.99 0.86 xxxx 0.86 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.98 0.98 0.98 II l Grade Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Saturation Flcw Module: Parking Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Bus Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.84 0.71 1.00 0.71 0.92 0.92 0.83 0.93 0.93 0.93 Area Adj: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.17 0.00 0.83 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 RT Adj: xxxx xxxx 0.85 0.89 xxxx 0.89 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3593 0 1599 226 0 11281753 3505 15681769 3528 10LT Adj: 0.96 xxxx xxxxx 0.94 xxxx 0.94 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx II IIIII PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Capacity Analysis Module: HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 1.00 0.84 0.71 1.00 0.71 0.92 0.97 0.83 0.93 0.98 0.98 Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.37 0.04 0.05 0.50 0.50 Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 **** **** **** MLF Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.05 0.00 0.14 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.01 0.74 0.74 0.09 0.83 0.83 Fnl Sat Adj: 0.95 1.00 0.84 0.71 1.00 0.71 0.92 0.92 0.83 0.93 0.93 0.93 Volume/Cap: 0.61 0.00 0.35 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.61 0.51 0.06 0.51 0.61 0.61 Delay/Veh: 53.3 0.0 40.0 46.5 0.0 46.5 99.9 5.5 3.5 45.6 3.4 3.4 Delay Adjustment Factor Module: II II User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AdjDel/Veh: 53.3 0.0 40.0 46.5 0.0 46.5 99.9 5.5 3.5 45.6 3.4 3.4 Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > Designoueue: 5 0 4 0 0 0 1 21 1 4 20 0 DelAdjFctr: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ******************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. S a WSPM.OUT 1-23-103 12:36p Page 8 of 9 ti a,- pm Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:36:16 Page 15-2 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. - Project #:5799 Tigard Oil Change Facility 2004 Total Traffic Conditions - Weekday PM Peak Hour Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (Permitted Left Turn Sat Adj) 2000 HCM Operations Method l Future Volume Alternative *,tt,tr********r*******r,trr,t,t,t,t*****+rw,t.***********,tr,*****************,t****r****** Intersection #6 Pacific Hwy/Tigard MkPl ******************************************************************************** Approach: North South East West Cycle Length, C: 100 100 xxxxxx xxxxxx Actual Green lime Per Lane Group, G: 4.53 4.53 xxxxxx xxxxxx Effective Green Time Per Lane Group, g: 4.53 4.53 xxxxxx xxxxxx ( Opposing Effective Green Time, go: 4.53 4.53 xxxxxx xxxxxx Number Of Opposing Lanes, No: 1 1 xxxxxx xxxxxx Number Of Lanes In Lane Group, N: 2 1 xxxxxx xxxxxx Adjusted Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt: 99 1 xxxxxx xxxxxx Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Plt: 1.00 0.17 xxxxxx xxxxxx Proportion of Left Turns in Opp Flow, Plto: 0.17 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Left Turns Per Cycle, LTC: 2.75 0.03 xxxxxx xxxxxx Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo: 6 0 xxxxxx xxxxxx Opposing Flow Per Lane Per Cycle, Volc: 0.17 0.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo: 1.00 1.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx Lost Time Per Phase, tl: 4.00 4.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx Eff grn until arrival of left-turn car, gf: 0.00 0.14 xxxxxx xxxxxx Opposing Queue Ratio, qro: 0.95 0.95 xxxxxx xxxxxx Eff grn blocked by opposing queue, gq: 0.00 0.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx Eff grn while left turns filter thru, gu: 4.53 4.39 xxxxxx xxxxxx Max opposing cars arriving during gq-gf, n: 0.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Proportion of Opposing Thru & RT cars, ptho: 0.83 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Left-turn Saturation Factor, fs: xxxxxx 0.88 xxxxxx xxxxxx Proportion of Left Turns in Shared Lane, pl: 1.61 0.17 xxxxxx xxxxxx Through-car Equivalents, ell: 1.41 1.40 xxxxxx xxxxxx Single Lane Through-car Equivalents, e12: 1.00 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Minimum Left Turn Adjustment Factor, fmin: 1.15 0.52 xxxxxx xxxxxx Single Lane Left Turn Adjustment Factor, fm: 1.00 0.94 xxxxxx xxxxxx Left Turn Adjustment Factor, flt: 0.96 0.94 xxxxxx xxxxxx ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.5.1115 (c) 2001 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to DOWLING ASSOCIATES, INC. S 1 WSPM.OUT 1-23-103 12:36p Page 9 of 9 1 Appendix F ODOT 7-Second Gap Methodology 7 MAR 01 '01 11: 18AM ODOT TROUTDALE I May 1, 2000 Sight Distance Measurements Proceaures - ,Background At the April RAME staff meeting the intersection sight distance was discussed. Several alternatives for intersection sight distance were considered with the following standard agreed to_ Intersection SIght Distance Standards The following standards should be utilized in reviewing proposed approaches: Driver's Eye Height: 3.5 feet Object Height: fber * 4. 4 S--Fo¢t • 'Distance to Vehicle:Assumed to be 10 feet to front of vehicle or 15 feet to driver's eye Measurement Standards: AASHTO's proposed 7 second gap standard would be utilized,which results in the following values for intersection sight distance: Speed Distance 20 mph 206 feet 25 257 30 309 35 360 40 412 45 463 50 515 55 566 60 617 65 669 Speed would be defined as the posted speed. NOTES: The following would be the variables that would be examined on a case by case basis and may be varied by the RAMEs or an engineer registered in the state of Oregon: 1) Distance to the front of a stopped vehicle. There will be situations where it will be appropriate to vary this distance. 2) The speed measure utilized to determine the required sight distance may be varied based upon an engineering study. Potentially measures such as 85th percentile speed and design speed may be utilized. * 3) The object height may be varied in those situations as determined appropriate. A maximum of 4.25 feet was discussed. The new AASHTO may provide further guidance on this subject. rt. )S&&!Distanoc Sods&Ha 12000.aa r s. Appendix G Unsignalized Queuing Analysis M j 1 Project Name: Quicklube Tigard Project #: 5799 Analysis Scenario: AM/PM V = flow rate for movement Analysis Period: 0.25 (peak 15 minute analysis) C = capacity of movement Analyst: SMQ Q = 95th percentile queue (veh) Date: January 29,2003 5 = storage need (ft) # of Int:i H ! Veh. Length (ft): 'Queue length calculated using Equation(17-37)presented in HighwoyCapacifyManua/2000. a''`Y 9 ,3 r� v ' lj ,, E fg 3 ... E, p, e. ' .,�`�a/� ,. �,. . � r -:7' ( ,4,,,:,..-,..,,_,J,r . .1 :. i , 1 ' aY .�y.. ;� �its' - ,��yy (,�t , '---,—;-...,:'...,--=-:-",';'; ,.,m� .a aw�z,,..e ..ri ...._:'�_.e;"3R,z... , ,.., s -§ ., 3 y", i f3giti 44Alii;i:**.illAiiiiitii;T: ,,.;ttitti.44.41* tk':-4, 111ti:41. Highway 99�N�EXIstin C ; r1 v+ - t . vi• °� ,s =,',-',-"°,,-;, j. t i ,, '�T ,-. st' x ;i "' � 3 3s �as- t®� r ", x % Easement(Ab1 Peak Hour) � i, q f,-3 Highway 99\N/Existing C ; 4'r s -. y x� � - ' ' �¢3 � p�� Jx �"i` '31';3:144K:0 k :3 £ � £ 8 ,4 4' Easement(PM Peak Hour) , rY - e ' .. 1:4:A:4!&../14740:` . � �' Q .,,,,,,,,i,,,,,,,,-.4V �' 2.. t.� . Via. s � a a � � a�� Unsig Queue Intersection Summary PI ()7()6( N(A\d/ , _ Horst 1 ' Rf/A'1 ci., v , 3 ro ker au- \ Rf/MK ,,, :;__2__Vax: Equity Group equity group, inc. . , , Fax. Cover Letter Date: Total pages including coverer-\-1- From: ......p. . , ,t H 'imp Horst Broker A Re: k i [fit C�_ Y�P�`llA ,lk t� teMax Equity Group • i Phone Phone: (503) 495-4962 ' Ph -(..___ ,( _—.-6 --c 2� Fax � �� Fax Phone: (503) 626-8994 Cell (503) 310-4776 r i 4 Remarks: Reply ASAP Please Comment Urgent � For Your Review ❑ P .' ❑ [ i \ , , i ti r ; r ReMax.Equity Grou► Inc.Realtors 9790 SW Nimbus Avenue Beaverton Or 97008 .: NO. 8462 P. 2 1 p Vi r 1O C) • : F: 430 . E -4Z , � -4z rit 393.$0 2355O a) ui S' c 0 'DI \ O i?.„ it m w 4�� U. 40 i .01 as CO - i _ CO cl 4 Q2 • N IS a, 5166 S.) / #$' ish v• Ay �� /00,, be ( 10 4 tll 9 fl) cti.N., <4 cry / , iryo 4 ....._ N,, Id 1 A 4___ 4sw.,,,, , f \ >\ /0 :-..... Ci) i -140 �s % 0 # 0 SQ,b( S , oC/ !s 0 p _ t ° N 00 Nan 4 �: „: �• 01. ooat-on: I IlkIi I ,.:;:.i ash Enclosure alo 40.00' andicap Parking Easement ao .• ..• ......:.. I>Y: Area-• 1 `.... ,,,Iia' :•'.T;::y.,.„. :d/ 4 sq ft up 1020 sq ft down Grass t ... 330 sq ft bays Area X330 sq ft basement Exit Drive 1066 total sq ft 30. 00' 5 toot landscape strip 10 foot curb tight sidewalk Na. 8462 P. 4 Parking 4 50 . 00' 30. 00 ' f Future 3 Bay Detail Shop 1620 sq ft 1 Vacuum Stations 00/ aids 3E . 75 ' 20.00' 45 . 00' Future Car Wash 4"-<de 1 45/ i ..*'.' �, / ,\% S•\ 4\0 t 444\ \ Lsl , ', �+ e • O /1P 0 - CI' ' u ofs:N. )1 c,.., 4 CD \\ I ( 0 2--P , ) /rm t ,,,,. A -,,,, r. ....„ ...___ ___ _ a '"0, i _ , (tiu . ,\, / ,_ s? 4 d \ • ' / -/ - Nic ,, V 14* i 41Pit, i,t ti,t, lit ,/,i: ( , / a- / g 4( lil ' ) , ci* Ill' ' )°' \ ter, " it( I . — __,t, 4 4 1,4 f / 1 i i A ) . i 10 t`• .� ray 4t K N. i. „, ti Y d 4),•, „ , N, \ i 1eb, y l ‘ st. • ) ,..• •N`s* �-- ily of trelARti , 1 \it( INI�L.Y MAP 24 r-- / . 2451 / ////// I /1„,,,,.,,,.._,,,.,,, \ / / •L GEHn' 11 ., \ � \ � _ > 1. _ _ ��_:1y L: / / _V/~ . i ,- r'! \ / Tigartl Area Map _-- / • N o 25 50 Feel t---_ —s ---, o 250 ,..36 feet C _\ � /1/1/1 zT 4 IV , . ►it�!, -- City of Tigard Inlonnalicn on Ihis map is for general location only and \�� should be verified veth the Development Services Division. \\ 13125 SW Hall Blvd / Tigard, 97223 / (503)63P-4171 _— __-__.._ i -__ hllp:/Asww.cifiperd pp up Community Development Plot date Nov 25, 2002;C:\rnagicWIAGIC03.APR CITY OF TIOARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 120 DAYS = 9/2/2003 FILE NO.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2003-00005 Type II Land Use Application FILE TITLE: QUICKLUBE APPLICANT: VMLK Consulting Engineers OWNER: DDHK, LLC. Attn: Jennifer Kimura Attn: Jim Horst 3933 SW Kelly Avenue 12604 SW 60th Court Portland, OR 97239 Portland, OR 97219 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Development Review to demolish an existing antique shop and construct a 3-bay oil change facility with associated parking and utilities. The property is approximately 21,780 square feet in size. LOCATION: 13555 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S102CC, Tax Lots 600, 701 and 702 ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.705, 18.725, CRITERIA: 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. CIT AREA: Central CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: El TYPE I ® TYPE II El TYPE III El TYPE IV DATE COMMENTS WERE SENT: MAY 15, 2003 DATE COMMENTS ARE DUE: MAY 29, 2003 ❑HEARINGS OFFICER (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM ❑PLANNING COMMISSION (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM El CITY COUNCIL (TUES.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM ®STAFF DECISION (TENTATIVE) DATE OF DECISION: JULY 1, 2003 COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION ® VICINITY MAP ® LANDSCAPING PLAN ® IMPACT STUDY ® SITE PLAN ❑ STORMWATER REPORT Z TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ® NARRATIVE ® ARBORIST REPORT ® OTHER: MISCELLANEOUS STAFF CONTACT: Mathew Scheidegger, Assistant Planner (503) 639-4171, Ext. 2437 LAND USE APPLIC 'TION Droeec = c```�-�'- _ F,�C .�, Date: (__ COMPLETENESS REVIEW COMPLETE INCOMPLETE STANDARD INFORMATION: _Deed/Title/Proof Of Ownership Neighborhood Mtg. Affidavits, Minutes, List Of Attendees gf' Impact.Study(18.390) USA Service Provider Letter Construction Cost Estimate 01,1 i tefs Of Application Materials/Plans Pre-Application Conference Notes Envelopes With Postage (Verify Count) PROJECT STATISTICS: • Building Footprint Size ❑ % Of Landscaping On Site %Of Building Impervious Surface On Site ❑ Lot Square Footage PLANS DIMENSIONED: ❑ Building Footprint ❑ Parking Space Dimensions(Include Accessible&Bike Parking) ❑ Truck Loading Space Where Applicable ❑ Building Height ❑ Access Approach And Aisle ❑ Visual Clearance Triangle Shown ADDITIONAL PLANS: ❑ Vicinity Map ❑ Architectural Plan II Tree Inventory ❑ Existing Conditions Plan ❑ Landscape Plan ❑ Site Plan ❑ Lighting Plan TREE PLAN/MITIGATION PLAN: ❑ ❑ ❑ Cl ADDITIONALREPORTS: (list any special reports): fes,_ -�'--,2 -- ❑ s ' s ❑ ❑ ❑ RESPONSE TO APPLICABLE CODE SECTIONS: ❑ 18.330(Conditional Use) ❑ 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) ❑ 18.165(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) ❑ 18.340(Director's Interpretation) ❑ 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) ❑ 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) ❑ 18.350(Planned Development) ❑ 18.705(Access/Egress/Grculation) ❑ 18.780 ❑ 18.360(Site Development Review) ❑ 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) ❑ 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) ❑ 18.310(Variances/Adjustments) ❑ 18.715(Density Computations) ❑ 18.790(free Removal) ❑ 18.380(Zoning Nap/Text Amendments) ❑ 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) ❑ 18.795 efisual Clearance Areas) ❑ 18.385(Miscellaneous Pernoss) ❑ 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) ❑ 18.797(Water Resources(WR)Overlay District) ❑ 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) ❑ 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) U 18.198(Wireless Communication Facilities) ❑ 18.410(lot line Adjustments) ❑ 18.740(Historic Overlay) ❑ 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) ❑ 18.420(land Partitions) ❑ 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) ❑ 18.430(Subdivisions) ❑ 18.145(landscaping&Screening Standards) ❑ 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) ❑ 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) ❑ 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) ADDITIONAL ITEMS: I:\curpin\masters\revised\land use application completeness review.dot REVISED: 17-Jan-01 March 26, 2003 VLMK Consulting Engineers Attn: Jennifer Kimura 3933 SW Kelly Portland, OR 97239 RE: Notice of Incomplete Submittal/SDR2003-00005/Koch/Davidson Oil Change Dear Ms. Sheppeard: The City received your request for Site Development Review (SDR) approval for the above-referenced project. Based on a preliminary review of your application materials, staff has determined that your submittal is incomplete for the purposes of continuing with Site Development Review. Please submit the following information in order for staff to begin your review: 1. Submit 16 additional sets of application materials. Please make sure all plans are folded at time of submittal. 2. Submit construction cost estimate. The required cost estimate is needed to verify application fees. 3. Submit Impact Study. The impact study should address the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large. 4. Submit a copy of the mailing list. You are required to provide a copy of your mailing list that was generated by the City of Tigard in order for Staff to verify addresses of the required envelopes. If the mailing list in more than 3 months old, you will be required to have a second list generated by the City. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 503-639-4171, x2437. Sincerely, Mathew Scheidegger Assistant Planner I:\curpl n\mathew\sdr\SDR2003-00003.acc c: SDR2003-00003 Land use file Itlgfa CITY OF TIGARD May 5, 2003 OREGON VLMK Consulting Engineers Attn: Jennifer Kimura 3933 SW Kelly Portland, OR 97239 RE: Koch/Davidson Oil Change SDR2003-00005 Completeness Letter Dear Ms. Kimura The City of Tigard received your application for a Site Development Review on March 4, 2003 and the additional items requested on April 22, 2003. The subject property is located at 13555 SW Pacific Highway, and is described as WCTM 2S102CC, Tax Lots 00600, 00702, and 00701. This letter is to inform you that the application has been deemed complete on May 5, 2003, and is scheduled for review. A tentative decision on this application should be issued in 6-8 weeks. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your project, contact me at (503) 639-4171, x2437. Sincerely, Matt Scheidegger Assistant Planner cc: Land use case file No. SDR2003-00005 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503)639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 CONSULTING P 503.222.4453 F 503.248.9263 ENGINEERS E vlmk@vlmk.com 3933 SW Kelly Avenue • Portland • Oregon 97239-4393 W www.vlmk.com LETTER� OF TRANSMITTAL TO CI-I� I I ► ✓ C=4 DATE: h 1 f4 / 6 i /). I [ ` ) I I 1 ii 1 VC PROJECT: 414 ( G� I.-LA --ri r/ru/-6-4 i f 2_ 7 2 2- F_) _ ,, ATTN: JOB NO: �« 7 WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover is 49.1�I i K.-CY--; the following items: ❑ Shop Drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Change Order Li -- C•P1E9..\ DATE NO. 1 FC I p1 ( C n V Ji , N� v� pc76 . 6 S-_.i- c$-- Eli L I clOczA LI 19 V- .-- -- pp N 1 C.7_, pv-e- 1 (114 ,Khvi/i -/--Zc,li-)c-,-tA-s THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For Approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution _ ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE _ 20 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO >/ SIGNED -Al il i. (/v If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once CONSULTING P503.222.4453 F 503.248.9263 ENGINEERS E vlmk@vlmk.com 3933 SW Kelly Avenue • Portland • Oregon 97239-4393 W www.vlmk.com LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO Ci (- /' ` i (`/l DATE: 1' i i 6 )' I a 31 ) f l J t 1./ c4 PROJECT: Gi IA 1 c-'' 1,, ,Lc ..f1 q�� vE2E t g -7 i Z -77 ATTN: JOB NO: d FA mi 0 WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover vi• v( C I I tc the following items: ❑ Shop Drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples Li Specifications ❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Change Order ❑ CDATE NO `I . l K " l I F-,. / 3171 -1 -fri vc, itt-yy-i or 3 o(L` p I mo, THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For Approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution _ ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 20 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO SIGNED _ (j.‘/1/1171 If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS 87AM Conditions Associated With 11:33:47AM TCoIM D E sNIOS .As.R CK Case #: SDR2003-00005 Condition Status Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Date By 1 ACCESS POINT JOINT USE DOCUMNTATI\ None Met MAS 8/4/03 MAS 1. Provide documentation in the form of deeds, easements,leases or contracts that establish joint use of the existing access point. 1 CROSS-OVER EASEMENTS None Met 8/4/03 MAS 8/4/03 MAS 2. Provide cross over easements for the three(3)parcels that are associated with the proposal. 1 ODOT APPROACH ROAD PERMIT None Met 8/4/03 MAS 8/4/03 MAS 3. Provide documentation that an Oregon Department of Transportation(ODOT)Approach Road Permit has been acquired. 1 PACIFIC HWY. STREET TREE PLAN None Met MAS 8/4/03 MAS 4. Provide a plan showing street trees along SW Pacific Highway in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0(Size and Spacing of Street Trees). 1 PFI PERMIT None NOT MET KSM 7/24/03 PLL 5. Prior to issuance of a site permit,a Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit is required for this project to cover the sewer and water connections and any other work in the public right-of-way(ROW). Six(6)sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards,which are available at City Hall and the City's web page(www.ci.tigard.or.us). 1 PFI PERMIT FINANCIAL ASSURANCE None NOT MET KSM 7/24/03 PLL 6. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name,address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee",and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example,specify if the entity is a corporation,limited partnership,LLC,etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. OR. HWY. DIVISION SITE PERMIT None NOT MET KSM 7/24/03 PLL 7. Prior to issuance of the site permit,the applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division,to perform work in the right-of-way of Highway 99W. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. 1 ODOT APPROVED ACCESS PERMIT COPY None NOT MET KSM 7/24/03 PLL 8. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall provide the City Engineering Department a copy of the ODOT approved access permit. 1 ODOT APPROVAL-STORM H2O DETENTIO None NOT MET KSM 7/24/03 PLL 9. Prior to issuance of the site permit,the City Engineering Department must receive confirmation of ODOT approval of the stormwater detention system. 1 ON-SITE H2O QUALITY FACILITY None NOT MET KSM 7/24/03 PLL 10. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards(adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department(Kim McMillan)for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition,a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 1 EROSION CONTROL PLAN None NOT MET KSM 7/24/03 PLL 11. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, December 2000 edition." l MIXED SOLID WASTE& RECYCLABLES None NOT MET MAS 7/24/03 PLL 12. Address one(l)of the four(4)methods of mixed solid waste and recyclable storage according to Section 18.755.040(Methods of Demonstrating Compliance). DESIGN STDS. FOR WASTE/RECYCLABLE None NOT MET MAS 7/24/03 PLL 13. Provide information regarding the design standards of the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables section of the Tigard Development Code(TDC). Page 1 oft CaseConditions..rpt ywr.n `. u ri,- ;ne..�.'re+-i9e...,. ...�S Zt. •' +•Z4–- =R4 ' __ -. - � 37a .t..r e�i.uii^arr� �tM� _ —' " - -- -1,4. -After recording. please r eturn to: ' - - _ Stan P. Iotenberg ,.Q Crenley. toteaberg. et al -M� 1211 Sid Fifth Avenue, apt t Floor '"'= Portland, OR 97204 -;ii IMENEET -' Tai6 tae tent is entered into and effective •=2LiniaACJ# �nG,.(� , 1994, by and between Ted and Helen E. Gene .J ("Grantor") turd P.tuline E. Luty ("Grantee"). RECITALS:: 3t1 Eki 104 A. Grantor. is the owner of propertyibd descreon the attached Exhibit ''A' and hereinafter referred to ae Parcel "I." a, -, �F!'' IMF'B. Grantee is the owner of property described in the ,-- attached Exhibit 'B," which is immediately north and adjacent to ,;_ �•z Parcel "I" and is hereinafter described as Parcel "II." , :•. cs z w C. Grantor is also the owner of property described in the -'e z attached Exhibit "C," which is adjacent and immediately west of _; 1: c.- Parcels I and II, and is hereinafter referred to as Parcel "III." .,. ' w4 a= D. Grantee and Grantor desire to obtain an Easement from - - 1 '_ L C W Grantor for the ptrposes of ingress and egress to and from Parcels _r k- -0 "II" and "III," r spectively, by means of travel over and across r o Parcel "I" for the benefit of Parcels "II" and "III" owners, their tenants and guest!1. f,. - r.i., NOW, THERETO:LE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and 1 : .: "-_ conditions conta.sed herein, and a Contract of Sale dated .. . ,f_w , 1994 IT IS AGREED: 1. Grant of Easement. Grantor, hereby grants an irrevocable, non-[xclusive Easement to Grantee and Grantor only for the purposes and ..n the areas described as follows: (a) Po-- the purpose of ingress and egress to and from Parcels "II" and 'III," for vehicular travel over and across, the driveway (describ:d below) of Parcel "I." 2. Drivewa'r. The Easement shall be located within a • • driveway which ce®fences with a curb-cut located along the most northerly portion of Parcel ^I^ adjacent to S.K. Pacific Highway as _ is approximately pictorially delineated on the attached Exhibit "D" • ("Driveway"). (a) Tht Driveway continues in a westerly direction from S.W. Pacific Higzway, running parallel to the most northerly property line of Parcel "I" and having a width equal to the distance between he north property line of Parcel "I" and a point which is approximately parallel to the curb-nut on the soutf3, side : of the Driveway a .on, S.E . Pacific Highway_ i Pane 1 - Easement a t33on-.u,.nt -21 !'a K .L • • • � C»+ � 1h � •• fS - � Y - ,,;,T. - ` . }� -�� i 7 •- � • s5''Tl i \id - • .i - a 'd z8S0-LL6-COS uouaa jaeyo '14 e9 : l ? 3. Iiainten;Dge of Driveway. Grantor and Grantee agree to - ; 3harc equally the cost of the ongoing maintenance, upkeep and repair of the Driveway within the Easement. - (a) In the event Grantor or Grantee makes any reasonably necessary repairs within the Easement, the other party shall. reimburse the party who made such repairs for one-half (1/2) of any gill costs related to mich repairs within thirty (30) days of receipt of _ en invoice specifying the nature of such repairs. Any such costs -- not reimbursed within the thirty (30) day period shall accrue ,- , interest interest at the rite of twelve percent (12%) per annum from the = 71 Sate such costs we re incurred until paid. _ 4. =mud inn. Grantor and Grantee agree to cooperate with = '; each other by regiirinq Grantor and Grantee, and their tenants, w; employees, custosu rs, invitees, guests, agents, etc., to refrain ;p+ from (a) parking "ehicles in the Driveway which would hinder the -• free flw of traff to to and from Parcels "II" and "III" and (b) the =: improper parking c f vehicles in designated parking spaces on each a< of the Parcels. F 5. HisceJlzpeous. In the event Grantee constructs ! improvements on Parcel "II" (other than those necessary for the 1.. surface parking of vehicles thereon) or Grantee uses Parcel II for storage of any )(lid (excluding the receipt of normal shipments), I. • this Easement shall automatically terminate and Grantee shall have no further rights hereunder. s. (a) Gm ntee acknowledges that any such improvements •_ -` gould cause an overburdening of the Easement. (b) Wit bin sixty (60) days of the recording of this •: ,- easement, Grantee shall place a sign on Grantee's property, - • reasonably approvisi by Grantor, identifying the parking area on Parcel "II" for tenants, contractors, invitees, agents, etc. The I:' . sign shall also warn against parking vehicles on the Driveway and r that violators vii be towed at the owner's expense. Such sign 1: shall be maintain ad by Grantee in reasonably good condition and repa it for as lone as this Easement reeatains in epfeet. ? S. Attorne} Pees. In the event suit or action is instituted # oy either party hereto in order to interpret or enforce the terms hereof, the Iasi g party shall pay the prevailing party its attorney fees and costs as awarded by the court at trial or upon any appeal or review thereof. I 7. Binding S£fect. This Easement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties, their heirs, successors and l assigns, shall run with the land and shall benefit Parcels 'II" and ' ! 111I1 and burden larcel "I." i.i 1 ea Page 2 - Easement •-� , -.1 ‘33[1111..ne.e i is .r'.. Y '.Z:=1-.1,:n e'.' .•u _ -"Mt' _o.2M,Prair.T1745% i, &� 't 1 Psv)'' i unJ, �tiir�� -,-..,7--,:::._-:: 1�� .}�-a. • SSC}.s,'• •..4.,.....;2.6i.-,.-:,--..<:::.-.-:;;,;.1-;-:. • ':•;.1:`,-1••••:l'•!:-.=:-' lam + '1 1 - J ._..,,t .. ....7„.. !,..:„..,_. ..,...._...7. ...6,...s1;, ..;,.:.4.....,„..:......,......, , ...•...4... •: • „7...-.•....: .,.. ......k :•......_ • _ ...... :::e_...,.- g,-...pr„...,-.-..- . - • ”-°3"31o`i,v .:.:1t,. 3 : •••.. • • cyan. E .d 28S O-LLG-EOS uo'l.uaQ T aeyo T W eLZ : T T CO ; C' - -....i_1 ...7-74--,1 8. agnea gam. This Easement shall be amendod only by and y, inetrn ent in w:itiug signed by Grantor and Grantee. _s IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Emecaent _' effective the de to and year first mentioned above. -.ad , • � GRANTOR: GRANTEE: ,6GA -i a,.f� � �,I.,,�a d' .,.yam 1 Ted''Gano Pauline E. Lut i j Helen E. Gano STATE OF-OREGeN-- ) )ss. _ i f` Canty of r c�/I FAI /�j 1 ,It:f1��' On this , day of/ C41 c ti , 1994, personally aerie y -•G.: "•: li Ted Gano, who, being duly sworn, acknowledged the fo %,. A;!moi`' 4 instrument to be his voluntary act and deed. .y :4hti�; �`%; Notary Public of Oregon:' • _ ",,�• `' ' r ..:: Hy commission Ex 7t T1 :ts MI o;:-' I es F7Aie.i0/4- Ac /MU sot .no.wa i. STATE OF •o eot4 ) )ss. County of (1jA Gti 1. On this _ day ofar , 1994, personally a eared:.:,: .: 1. Helen E. Gano, i'ho, being duly sworn, acknowledged the fo -StdY'''' .!: instrument to bE her voluntary act and deed. , ;•'. � .`.. Notary Public of Oregon -1' c�"6 `- r y Comission Expires:R-t0EM}saleI!n m !!1 STYVE 0? OREGON ) < as. — Col:my o f /i i►,t,,t4 i On this �say of , ..e94, personally appeared ' • Patline E. laity, who, being y sworn, acknowledged the foregoing I instrument to be her volunt ry act and dee• .!.=m,• OFf IC AL SEAL 1 r t =.(tea = O J><J►r• lUlRRf8 Note J.•lic of Oregon t `..� COMMJSSSS N0O242T1 /� My Co s6 inn Expir :_741/2_7 I1Y 4N00 SRESSUL IT.LOST' .0-- :-..,....:-.1. ...x.:3. 9:^,-------,---,,---, 2.4 Page 3 — Easener t 1x1 ftnieesartint n 4; t t '"fis'� .; 7„- m f>.,c;.�}. -,n. ,n-.�xs,-rt-',?c'-icy:-5.+-0c'tJ0,4.5.tom,. k ,[. , / .t r. (4. i .. • a7 4r , • 1,) `� r roti yw •�S Tt ” • _ _-'.'.1,.:-....,:..,... , nom7. �rV`.• y , • =x%.-53 f j .- _ - -- -- - 1 t7 'd Z6S0-LLB-COS uouaQ Teeyo'W eL2 : TT EO " r' . . . — -xK t ti dt4 .• j"j)-rr ? c8izr- _._ 4, wwc.+ l a T -- iriiir ,. --- - lsbibit "A" C RAAC!L a A tract of Iind in Section 2, Township 2 South, Bangs 1 . West, Willamette Meridian, in the County of Washington and State o.' Oregon. Said tract of land being more particularly described as follows: s- Commencing at a point that bears South 1305.0 feet and ill `.sii South 03'03'42" West 389.78 feet from the Nest quarter :; y) corner of sa:.d Section 2, said point of beginning is also .:411111 the Southwest corner of that tract of land conveyed to - �,1 Wayne C. R,embold and J.B. Bishop doing business as ` Reaboid-Bisbap Properties, described in Pee No. 78-8522, Washington Onznty Deed Records; thence from said point ofIF 'fI beginning South 78'40028" East along the South line of said Reebold'-Bishop Tract a distance of 43.45 feet to the being the 1n•:ersection of the North line of S.W. Watkins ni Avenue and tie West line of Pacific Highway West; thence �� <s, North 33'15'17" East along the East line of the said :r,",'..; Rembold-Bich ap Tract a distance of 354.77 feet to the ..�; Southeast comer of that tract of land conveyed to J.R. Devers and Dc rothy Devers, husband and wife, described in LL :�I Book 733, p tge 31, Washington County Records; thence -` North 34'44'430 West along the South line of the said _ Devare Tract and the Westerly eaten3ion of tha South line - . a distance of 120.0 feet to a point; thence South 1 33'15'17" We:it parallel to the East line of said Rembold- mo Bishop Tract a distance of 236.0 feet, re or less, to the West lire of the said Rembold-Bishop Tract; thence South 03'03'42" West along the West line of the said ,-t: Reabold-Nish 1p Tract a distance of 135.00 feet, more or „'.:.- less, to the point of beginning. 1. r S '`I 5 1 -! ' {"j rj1Y t '''• c.-,:-.%5. J 11 -� / - 'i - - }y'l E 1: i. _,.-;_..-.-- .....:4t-- - .. 'y"`Ci y-" ' - a I - .g k _ rx, f , by r/ / v ., ° c A t tt� ttiti,' > �• ` r 1 1' 1.1r:;.- .5. � ire arab" a.s,> > --7q::,,177:1-..-.f'' ,- 'sirr a • i. .r r` ' --t y,F P+' ifiV4 le 7 c ;L-11. ,r t IT- r. h iffl..• �-t �: r' ' 's,rte_ A• _ __ —. •. �r ._.. • .. i • F `.-•�,� ..-. .... - — S -d 213SO-LL6-EOS uoluaa iaey°iW e 8 2 : I T EO T O • -_-_—- _�..:=31'e- a.r.r ®.�� ...._. .-.a.••.---—w-0-4a11s.n.1C{�l�� c:yutia — -'---= Order No. 9307418:-W — Exhibit "$" PARCEL II _—____i ' A tract of land in the Southwest One Quarter of the Southwest o:3e yowls;. of Cort ion 2, Township 2 South, Range 1 Went of the -:_1 Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard, Washingtenr County, O*ecna 4.1 described as fo3los es s Beginning at the Northeast corner of Lot 3, of MELROSE 8'OBDIVISION; thence leaving said subdivision, North 89 49'36" g :141 Rest, and along the South line of that tract of land as described in Fee Ntmber 85-50752, Washington County Deed _ r Records, 139.47 feEt to a 5/8 inch Iron Rod and the True Point ki of beginning of the herein described parcel; thence continuing ;: t along said line Nor th 8949'36' Fast, 79.08 feet to a 5/8 inch ..+ Iron Rod; thence leaving said line South 33'15'17" Went, parallel "' to the westerly Right of Way line of the Pacific Highway, 86.36 { 4 feet to a point on the Northerly Line of that Tract of Land as +,,a12-0 described in Fee ?Amber 7841338, Washington County Deed Records; ...`.t.'' tlence North 56.44'43" Went, along said northerly line of said �',�. Fee Number 7841338, 66.00 feet to a 5,(8 inch Iron Rod; thence :rya, leaving said Northerly line, North 33 15'17" East, parallel to fir;. tle westerly Right of Way line of the Pacific Highway, 42.79 jr fiat to the True Pcint of Beginning. • - !frig. 1. 0 1 JI g:--:i1 IILI IPiJ' - 7-4,•.'; _t i-i,ej .C=Y'.l 1F......,:-..i, .9 n • r S.;:',5: 7-1,7'. -+ ff 1x 4. r . tr rr lH � tF,_ ` ! - + Ax -f. )4i;; + + \« )^ma s' '''••••''' •,,.'t:-2.,f; z, 41 ' t t : ' ?� � I -a7-:- - 4Ifi : v_ t �, - _ ' t' " _ Wd v t�rx r - • c S ,,�� u. ryas_-I' I ._ ..__ -`1 _.— S.l. 9 'd 29S0-LLS-EOS uo•zuaa Teeyon -4 eG2 : TT CO To • TCCC td .ir F y.. • -i•Td 4 '_' -. ...":,*.r3toff , �lic.:is�.r. w�a•c wr.�i *') n„„1(�r,A! y' . .Ly�= -• -• __ - iiiExhibit wen ii PARCEL III . R tract of lat.d located in the Southwest one-quarter of 11 the Southwest ane-quarter of Section 2, Township 2 South, Vii. Range i West, Willamette Meridian, Washington county, .1 state of oregc'n, described as follows: 3eginning at i 3/4 inch iron pipe on the line between • Sections 2 and 3, begin 1305.0 feat South of the quarter _t l section cornu- common to said Sections 2 and 3; thence - South 89 degr:en 47' East 218.54 feet to the Northwest corner of Tract II as described in Contract recorded ?'ebruary 22, L978, Recorder's Fee No. 78 8552; thence ??,, ' southwesterly 86.16 feet parallel with the Northwesterly .'i-c: right of way line of the relocated Southwest Pacific Highway to a point on the Northeasterly line •of that tract conveyed by Wilbur Bishop, Jr. to Harry O. and +,1 Geraldine H. c'abl and Leonard E. and Genevieve Wahl, by Deed dated September 13, 1978, recorded September 18, 1978, Recorder's Fee no. 78 41338, Washington County Deed Records; thdencc Northwesterly along the said Northeasterly tract line, 66 feet to the most Northerly corner of said Wahl tract: thence South 33 degrees 15'17” West 234.0 fest, more or less, along the Northwesterly line of the se.id Wahi Tract; thence North 3 degrees 00' East 235.5 feet, more or less to the point of beginning; .•, 'TOGETHER WITH a 45.0 foot wide strip of land for ingress and egress pu_poses situated in Section 2, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington Ccunty, Oregon, being more particularly i.1 described as follows: The Northeasterly 45.0 of that tract of land conveyed to Harry & Geraldine Wahl and Leonard and Genevieve Wahl, - recorded in Fie No. 78-041338,. Washington County Dead Records, the Southwesterly line of said strip being parallel with the Northeasterly line of said Wahl tract; 'LZCLIIDING TSEJ EFROH: P. tract of lana in the Southwest One Quarter of the Southwest 3 ► one Quarter of Section 2, Township 3 South, Range 1 West of the 1;1 Fillamette Meridian, City of. Tigard, WaRbirgtan (o'inty, Oregon 1_ i'.escribed ns f allovs: rseginning at tee Northeast corner of Lot 3, of MELROSE y • UBDIVISION; t3ence leaving said subdivision, North 9949'36" ,. Cast, and aloe; the South line of that tract of land as V-.•; described in Fse Number 85-50752, Washington County Deed • 1 ; Records, 139.47 feet to a 5/8 inch Iron Rod and the True Point of beginning of the herein described parcel; thence continuing i -, ..; along said line North 89449'36m Rest, 79.05 feet to a 5/8 inch iron Rod; thence leaving said line South 33'15'17° West, parallel €:o the westerl'; Right of Way line of the Pacific Highway, 86.36 .feet to a point on the Northerly Line of that Tract of Land as I`E described in Fee Namber 7841338, Washington County Deed Records; ;•. thence North 55444'43° West, along said northerly line of said 1._ I'ee Number 7841330, 66.00 feet to a 5/8 inch Iron Rod; thence P!, leaving said B ortherly line, North 33415'17° East, parallel to 1 •1 the westerly Bight of Way line of the Pacific Highway, 42.79 -Ei beet to the True 'Point of Beginning. ii - i' l it, z ;a; 'Ria za . z _ - „-:�� ati .. - -,.,•q ;,rte - - s syS` d. •41ts '{.. ;1144r - h1. 41.,. i L • d Z6S0-LLG-COS uoluaQ TeeyotW eoC : TT CO TO Li;i 11 : 30a Michael Denton 503-977-082 p• 8 r �t�<^s�ti�kvvlCst'r _ � 1.15 ..... , v1q•In-r" r .� ' 3S �,T-r�zx-c ,1r4- ._ _._ Wit+ 1r ''.,475%.:41 -4,:=7' sc a _ i l.ti '.1".i.: 74_,.,-,.41.:L... pvm- ,52: •±:':7-1;1,`-r„." _Y a1\L¢' „,,-;,:-,,-,:=.;---...,-...._:.....,::,-,,,,t,11'..-. ! -1 d '�F? ..,ii:".-.•-•--.c..”;;-1-.;:kr-17.-.N.1- .. .yZw �K' 711 i - 1i , moi ' }rr� •�S .. ' n S .......':7-_-:.r...:-.0--,:--.1.-...,7.� � - 4�K{*y:i�4u ^.�3'° __- ' s yfca�1 1.. •• C. l Gr -77==. :: ; •.•sir ( i. • C i,°w� x7 �.. -.-- ..:-42.; - '.'`3`�a o.:. t d .fTisaF- - Pail" - �. _ 1 r , :'!1 4t.- r 4r�:fit -- I % .. - - 1 1 :2- ) Kr(3---..6.: ....., . .__ .._... 2 ; .'''..::.-. 0081 I OOLI 0091 0051 0ODi 000 OoaL~' !r• aor =.tt ld —.�Ar.....,.;...----•oSi._... .,..,..,.R$J. ;.-,......1..4'.21 ,M 1:i n a :all lel w l 1 f F:= N. - '4,....'re-,-;11 ';',-.1;;;-5-:::-..1'- ' , ,rte- �� y _... EI ~Jo .� �.`• ,. Iwo.. ‘'„/> ro Jrsor � ��,:. OOfl 'r 110 ;,: n ‘ Imo: �•ri: 008 7r86r �'rb.4 S 1\1•. 0001 11 `'� E%£ 4. 006 4.. 4' '~, o-r -S 44are Y a` qo+ ` Fos 1 1 7, !j'- a V t`•s + .r. S4 lie =>'� 108.deg • �� c yi3r.- h/� L f:. ,.M:. c. a,4.19 7rElb o° '' ./" ••• • §,•,r9N' ' 0, DOS 9 y• • tOL • 7.6r•1111 w _ LC:•iro r n+q / imago:•7•c r �Q z ~ 11 7YDb7 'u.a `,..�� / "'►n nng et s. 00 .�°/ ��.A �^ _ 1 2,L 'tri 33NvEIis'iN; a e.t.i. CiC .Jii 0 :%!%, ,_ •(6AJAs$!n3 /C DauBl)ao'e •` Nr ' M •w w � 00110901 p' •suewlp ul Au F1 •subulcuen Jo: • ' ou sawRSse AUecwoo 241 _ "' PUT,sesnua...-,,. .6ur►eno1 ui 6UIFslsse Id OSoCmo•ou1._, 1)s apew sI motet;y03Bys a! • =:- ___ - >>—s� z.-7.-,--.. r.7---:„.--...,--.=- --__--":"--..7.--,-4-, S,L.=-- a'`" _ - + s - : -. r5v - . w y77: rb 'aYr ''p. . • .0 ` ^I� +. E \ • Ne:� .?*??,t " a .AdQ9S y.- -'-'• -- , i 7 - •' p*1- -7- - .. --- !4^tT"n�:re7'Aei. ', } -.(-••••••1/47... S�cYm' -' vii ^tse.Zrz_ _- ____--..1---"—....02....... Conditions Associated With TIDEMARK Case #: SDR2003-00005 COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. Condition Status Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Date By 1 ACCESS POINT JOINT USE DOCUMNTATN None Met MAS 8/4/03 MAS 1. Provide documentation in the form of deeds,easements, leases or contracts that establish joint use of the existing access point. 1 CROSS-OVER EASEMENTS None Met 8/4/03 MAS 8/4/03 MAS 2. Provide cross over easements for the three(3)parcels that are associated with the proposal. 1 ODOT APPROACH ROAD PERMIT None Met 8/4/03 MAS 8/4/03 MAS 3. Provide documentation that an Oregon Department of Transportation(ODOT)Approach Road Permit has been acquired. 1 PACIFIC HWY. STREET TREE PLAN None Met MAS 8/4/03 MAS 4. Provide a plan showing street trees along SW Pacific Highway in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0(Size and Spacing of Street Trees). I PFI PERMIT None NOT MET KSM 7/24/03 PLL 5. Prior to issuance of a site permit,a Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit is required for this project to cover the sewer and water connections and any other work in the public right-of-way(ROW). Six(6)sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards,which are available at City Hall and the City's web page(www.ci.tigard.or.us). 1 PFI PERMIT FINANCIAL ASSURANCE None NOT MET KSM 7/24/03 PLL 6. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership,LLC,etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 1 OR. HWY. DIVISION SITE PERMIT None NOT MET KSM 7/24/03 PLL 7. Prior to issuance of the site permit,the applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division,to perform work in the right-of-way of Highway 99W. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. 1 ODOT APPROVED ACCESS PERMIT COPY None NOT MET KSM 7/24/03 PLL 8. Prior to issuance of the site permit,the applicant shall provide the City Engineering Department a copy of the ODOT approved access permit. I ODOT APPROVAL-STORM H2O DETENTIO None NOT MET KSM 7/24/03 PLL 9. Prior to issuance of the site permit,the City Engineering Department must receive confirmation of ODOT approval of the stormwater detention system. 1 ON-SITE H2O QUALITY FACILITY None NOT MET KSM 7/24/03 PLL 10. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards(adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department(Kim McMillan)for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition,a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 1 EROSION CONTROL PLAN None NOT MET KSM 7/24/03 PLL l l. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, December 2000 edition." 1 MIXED SOLID WASTE&RECYCLABLES None NOT MET MAS 7/24/03 PLL 12. Address one(1)of the four(4)methods of mixed solid waste and recyclable storage according to Section 18.755.040(Methods of Demonstrating Compliance). 1 DESIGN STDS. FOR WASTE/RECYCLABLE None NOT MET MAS 7/24/03 PLL 13. Provide information regarding the design standards of the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables section of the Tigard Development Code(TDC). Page 1 of 2 CaseConditions..rt �� Conditions Associated With TIDEMARK Case #: SDR2003-00005 COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. Condition Status Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Date By 1 2 ADDITIONAL PARKING STALLS None NOT MET MAS 7/24/03 PLL 14. Provide an additional two(2)parking stalls. 1 WHEEL STOPS FOR 3 PKNG. STALLS None NOT MET MAS 7/24/03 PLL 15. Provide and implement a plan showing the proposed three(3)parking stalls located on the boarder of the subject site to be fit with wheel stops that are at least four(4)inches high, located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. 1 LIGHTING PLAN None NOT MET MAS 7/24/03 PLL 16. Submit a lighting plan to be approved by Jim Wolf of the Tigard Police Department. 1 COMPLETE WORK IN PUBLIC ROW None NOT MET KSM 7/24/03 PLL 17. Prior to a final building inspection,the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way(or public easement)and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. 1 H2O QUALITY FAC. DESIGN ENGINEER None NOT MET KSM 7/24/03 PLL 18. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards,the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection,the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard(Inspection Supervisor)with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. 1 STORM H2O MGMT. MAINT. AGREEMENT None NOT MET KSM 7/24/03 PLL 19. Prior to a final building inspection,the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management,or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer,for the proposed onsite storm water treatment facility. 1 FINAL SIGHT DISTANCE CERTIFICATIO None NOT MET KSM 7/24/03 PLL 20. Prior to a final building inspection,the applicant's engineer shall provide a final sight distance certification. 1 SIDEWALK&CURB TO ODOT STANDARC None NOT MET KSM 7/24/03 PLL 21. Prior to final approval, sidewalk and curb must be constructed according to ODOT standards. Page 2 of 2 CaseConditions..rr r.VP'711-n .•nr of Transportation PERM!/ 10 CONSTRUCT A STATE HIC HWAY APPROACH Application Id: 280; Highway Number:091 MileP. rit: 10.05 Reason for Request: Change in use Permit No: 51449 Issue Date: 07/08/2003 Completion Date: 06/15/2004 Applicant information Property Information Name: _. .�-----_._.-------- Tim Horst Address: __—. � 13565 SW Pacific Hwy. Company. Ti.and OR 97223 DDHK Ventures LLL — ress_ ---- ------— – County: Twnsnp• Range: Section: AddWashingtor 2S 1 2 9790 SW Nimbus Ave. Highway: Route: Beaverton OR 97008 Pacific Hwy.West[001' ORE99W MilePoint Engineering Station: Side of Hwy Nad Forest?: Phone: --�Y FAX 10.05 126+26.7 R N 503 495-4962 (503)626-8994 Landmarks: wait -- 325'North of SW Watkins Ave.; thors • e•uitygrou..com Thic rdlr•arrl chnrrlrl d-sn rrncfnrd and .i+cihlca from tha hinhwav at all times during construction. For inspection, call (503) 229-5002 • CHAW d_rpt—permit_apprch,plac Panted-07/08/2003 07:54:55 AM 3 : 42PM NO. 3573 1. 3 ' 14 Department of Transportation w;' "••� ;;•:?^ ODOT District 32A 5440 S N Westgate Drip e Suite 350 14'� '1 > Portland OR 97221 Theodore R.Kulongoski.,Governor (503)225-5002 Fax: (503)29r;-6058 justin.d shoemaker@odct.statc:.or.us 08, 2003 Horst DDHK Ventures I_'_ _-- -1790 SW Nimbus Ave. leaverton, OR 97008 Subject Transmittal of Final Permit to Construct a State Highway Approach Highway Number 091, (Pacific Hwy. West [001WI), at Milepoint 10.05 Application Number 2801 ODOT has received your signed Preliminary Construction Permit(s) can now issue a final Permit to Construct a State Highway Approach "The final Construction Permit(s) is attached. This Construction Permit includes the Construction Drawing(s) and all necessary terms and conditions. You have until the date specified, June 15, 2004, on the Construcion Permit(s) to complete installation of the approach(es). As set forth in OAR 734-051-0250, your contractor must advise ODO'" (please cor tact he District 02A Office at (503) 229-5002) at least 48 hours in advance of commencing construction. Construction of the approach must conform to the terms of the Construction Permit and exhibits attached to the Construction Permit. I have attached a copy of OAR 734-051-0280, which addresses applicant liability and control during construction of approaches. You must notify the District 02A Office when construction of the approach is completed. ODOT will inspect the completed approach and advise you in writing whether or not the approach has been constructed in a satisfactory manner. If the approach was constructed in a satisfactory manner, a Permit to Operete, Maintain and Use an Approach can be issued. it the approach was not constructed in a satisfactory manner, ODOT will provide in a written notice a list of all specific deficiencies that must be satisfactoril i corrected before a Permit to Operate, Maintain and Use an Approach can be issued. NOTE: An approach can be legally used ONLY after a Permit to Operate, Maintain, and Use an Approach has been issued. 2: £. : 42PM NO. 3573 H 4 '14 Transmittal of Final Permit to Construct a.;tate Highway Approach Highway Number 091,(Pacific Hwy.West[)01W)),at Milepoint 10.0.5 Application Number 2801. Tuesday,July 08,2003 Page 2 If you have any questions regarding the construction of your approachies), please contact me at (503) 229-5002. I welcome the opportunity to assist you. Sirycerel J stin Shoemaker, Permit Specialist DOT District 02A, Maintenance Office Attachments (Construction Permit and OAR 734-051-0280, Liability and Control) - 4 Oregon Department of Transportation PERMIT NO: 0 5 1 4 4 g PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A Completion Date: 06/15/2004 `- STATE HIGHWAY APPROACH7r 1 LAM r II Application Id:2801 Highway Number: uu) iaiiePoint: 'iu.u5 Reason tut- «;eyue L, •..itatIVC ill iso – IJJ `- Applicant Information Property information Main View Name: Address: Tim Horst 13565 SW Pacific Hwy. 7___2_____7( Company:n-i L Ti!and OR 97223 y /DDHK Ventures L LCounty: Twnshp- Range. Section z Address: Washin•tor 2S 1 2 _ �-'� / 9790 SW Nimbus Ave. Highway: Route: — Beaverton OR 97008 Pacific Hwy. West tout° utttssint k l� uv, MilePoint: Engineering Station: Side of l-twy: Nati Forest? _ 10.05 126+26.7 R N - Phone: FAX. - _.._ IAve.; _ - ; . v!_.�'f- (503)495 962 (503)626-8994 L325'Acs: entail: — 325'North of SW Watkins A e , ''' _ .. thors r 0-quitygroup.com _ ^ � - i J Insurance Information Tax Lot Information Specification Company: ---n 1 -- 'Width(W): —__ Angle(A): -- l 600 i 20.00ft 90 I Policy No: Amount: 701 Wing Width(X) Curb-Sdwlk(K;. 702 20.00ft 4.00ft Policy Begin. Policy End: `----- -– - --------------- Paving Lmt(P1): Paving Lmt(P2): .00ft .00ft Surf(Do): Performance Bond Information 30.00ft . Company - —__._._._..�.__ I Culvert Dials: Len. None .00in .00ft -- Sub Base Crse: e-�- �. - Thickness _ Bond No: Amount- Base Crse: i _. - Thickness. _ Property Owner Information ��1 Leval Crse, � Thickness- Name: ----._�..:_._ ....__ Tim Horst Wear Crse: Thickness'. Company: __ __— ------.L_.. DDHK Ventures LLL _ 'i. ;Instructions i Address. F Issuing of permits under these regulations is not a finding of compliance with the statewide planning goals Cr the 9790 SW Nimbus Ave. 1' Beaverton OR 97008 USA acknowledged comprehensive plan for the area Permits are issued subject to the approval of city,county or other governmental agencies having authority tc regulate land use by means of zoning and/or building regulations. It shall be the —_-__- applicant's responsibility to obtain any such approvals including,where applicable, local government determinations of 171 P(03'495-4962 FAX )626 8994 compliance with statewide planning goals, (OAR 734.051-0130) All materials and workmanship:",all be in accordance with 1996 Oregon Standard Specifications for Highway Construction eMait thorst@equitygroup.com The Permit is issued subject to the provisions ut Oregon Administrative Rules 734-051-0010 thr augh 734-0151-0480,which ars — Iby reference made a part of this permit: and whichare in effect ut any particular time in the duration of the permit. 'Applicant Signature 'J f J t-1 C. i Oats _ + T n, permit r_, +t valid until signed by r nl}'authorized I,,,y \ V._ ) l r .,(ti...` { ° yr QSehtu 1 ' rzf0f(?Il nApc3f ITrI r.Tt k o!Transportation. crii Agency Appro .!(if 7-(7-(71. , - i c.-,,T IA' , c°c,io (P S),4 '- I Date l i ! 1 r 111 PERMIT FOR ENCROACHMENT. CONSTRUCTION 0"9on Department ofTr•nsportationi rERa1r Av. 5 • 4 4 ON OR USE O1- SIA 1 t I`ilt�l'IWH Y r11 Application Id: 2801 Highway Number: 091 MilePoint 10.05 PROVISIONS Reason for Request; Change in use r-- n; Applicant: Tim Horst DDHK Ventures LLL 0 140.301 Construction Plans are approved in general only The District Manager or representative may require field changes. When revisions are made in the field,as-constructed drawings must be submitted to the District. 150.101 The permit and all specifications, details,typical drawings and standard drawings aitacrieo ro€rie peimu snarl cane pr .eoe nt..e uvei drawings and specifications produced by the Architect or Engineer representing the Applicant or Contractor. 150.102 The following ODOT documents or subsequent revisions there to, where applicable and not otherwise superseded by the permit language herein, shall be incorporated for use in this permit: Standard Specifications For Highway Constructions(1996), Supplemental Standard Specifications for Highway Construction (1998), Highway Design Manual (1993), and relevant Metric Standard Drawings. ODOT shall have authority over the acceptance of all materials and workmanship performed under this permit as stated in section 00150 00 of the Standard Specifications For Highway Constructions(1996). 150.151 "Applicant shall be responsible for locating and preserving all existing survey monumentation within the work area in accordance with ORS 209.150 and/or 209.155. if a monument or its accessories are inadvertently or otherwise disturbed or destroyed, applicant shall be responsible for all costs and coordination associated with its reestablishment by a professional licensed surveyor" 150.201 Within 48 hours before beginning permit work and again after completing permit work, the Applicant(or agent) shall notify the District permitting respresentative. 150.401 Applicant(or agent) shall furnish"as constructed"drawings, to this office,within 45 calendar days of the completion of the permitted activity. The drawing media shall be 11"X 17"and reproducible or Microstation®compatible. 150.402 Applicant shall hire a certified testing inspector to monitor construction and assure compliance with the specifications and provisions contained in 'his permit 150.403 Applicant is responsible for maintaining existing structures, including fences,unless otherwise directed by the District Manager or his representative 150.411 Applicant(or agent) shall have on the job site, at all times, a copy of the permit and all attachments rhe permit shall be readily available for inspection. 150.501 The permitted work is located within the Oregon Utility Notification Center(OUNC)area. The OUNC is a utilities notification system to notify owners of utilities about excavation work performed in the vicinity of their facilities. The utilities notification system telephone numbers 1-800-332-2344. 150.701 Maintain all existing highway signs. If any signs are damaged due to Contractor's operations, replace those signs before the end of that work shift-- Avoid operations whose methods, conditions, or timing may injure people or damage properties Damage includes staining surfaces with such things as mud and asphalt. When damage occurs,the District Manager will determine if it is to be corrected by repair. replacement,or compensatory payment. If compensatory payment is required,the District Manager will determine the amount. 150.702 Do not park on state right-of-way unless permitted by the District Manager. Comply with ORS 81C 230. 810.160 150.703 Remove all dirt and debris from the highway at the end of each work shift or more frequently if a h tzard to the traveling public exists or as directed by the District Manager. 160.801 All areas of excavation shall be returned to"pre-construction"condition or better Repair natural drainage so no water stands or collects in eyoavated areas,when practical. Slopes shall be trimmed to blend with the adjacent terrain. Replace the vegetative cover to blend with the adjacent nature! growth, , C�.1 „'” PERMIT FOR ENCROACHMENT, CONSTRUCTION le9onDepartment of'ranspoRaGon�l rcr vii riv. 0 5 4 4 ON OR USE V1- STATE i-ii�tiWAY II Application td: 2801 Highway Number: 091 MilePoint 10.05 PROVISIONS Reason for Request: Change in use �� 0-1 Applicant: Tim Horst Company: DDHK Ventures LLL 0 170.303 Applicant shall be responsible and liable for(1)investigating presence/absence of any legally protected or regulated environmental resource(s) in the action area; (2) determining any and all restrictions or requirements that relate to the proposed actions,and complying with such, including bur not limited to those relating to hazardous material(s),water quality constraints,weuanus, ai eneoloyt.,ai v1 iiisiuwit,ICSUwI threatened or endangered species, etc; (3)complying with all federal, state, and local laws, and obtaining all required and necessary permits and approvals. If the applicant impacts a legally protected/regulated resource, appiicanUpermittee shall be responsible for all costs associated with such impact, including, but not limited to all costs of mitigation and rehabilitation, and shall indemnify. and hold harmless ODOT for such impacts and be responsible and liable to ODOT for any costs or claims that ODOT may have. 200,021 The work area during construction or maintenance performed under the permit provisions shall be protected in accordance with the current Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, US Department of Transportation, and the Oregon Department of Transportation supplements thereto. Flaggers must have certification and must carry proof indicating their completion of an approved workzone traffic control course. Al!traffic control devices shall be maintained according to the ATTSSA Quality Standards for Work Zone Traffic Control Devices handbook. 220.021 When an abrupt edge is created by paving or excavation, the Applicant(agent) shall protect the traffic using the signing"ABRUPT EDGE DETAIL" and the'TYPICAL ABRUPT EDGE SIGNING DETAIL"configurations detailed on Standard Drawing RD900. Modify Standard Drawing RD900 �s described in §00220.40(d) of the Oregon Standard Specifications for Highway Construction - In areas of cold-plane pavement removal, grind around all existing utilities(valves and manholes). If the pavement is not replaced in the sc:me work shift, place a temporary taper of pavement on all sides of each utility to provide an even surface across the entire paved width. - For approach construction operations, backfill the excavation at the end of each shift or use other methods as approved by the Engineer tc provide a traversable s irface across the entire pavement width during non-work hours. 330.001 All rock shall be produced from an ODOT Certified material source. 330.411 Native material found to be unsatisfactory for compaction shall be disposed off of the project and Department controlled property. The site shall be shaped to drain,contoured,trimmed and seeded with native grasses in a manner satisfactory to the District Manager. 330.421 Only earth or rock shall be used as fill material- The site shall be shaped to maintain existing drainage,contoured, trimmed and seeded witu native grasses in a manner satisfactory to the District Manager an • . f C. Type B - Curbed Highway with/without Sidewai Approach rJ isnnrnarth Road nimensinns w x (See Page One for dimensions not shown) Standard Drawing used: RD720 RD721 RD722 Circle option used: A B CD EF G H TABLE A DIMENSIONS NOTES: W -width of Driveway fir= W:= Flare dimension K = As Shown on Standard Drawing and Option Used. 'N = W= See Table A on Appropriate Standard Drawing -,.� -- ---- X = See Table A on Appropriate Standard Drawing X= Plan Drawing and Dimensions Curb Type=Standard Drawing References Refer to the following Standard Drawings for all'Type S"Permits: 't. Standard Drawing RD700: Curbs 2. Standard Drawing RD720: Curb Line Sidewalk Driveways 3. Standard Drawing F1D721: Curb Line Sidewalk Orivways 4. Standard Drawing RD722 Separated Sidewalk Driveways 8 flj • •0WYS1M71Oo KL REGION OREGON! \ k „O.,60eVusrh =,mw4.dw 1-dm 0 DM !. YJ(''., 3 : 44PN' O. 35731A1T,''. 9 '14 y,_,:,epartraerttol7YenaPuNation APPLICATION AND PERMIT TO OCCUPY OR 1 2 A3 M7 3 8 3 1. 1 i PERFORM OPERATIONS UPON A STATE HIGHWAY I - See Oregon Administrative Rule, Chapter 734, Division 55 CLASS_ I KEYri l GENERAL LOCATION PURPOSE OF APPLICATION tTO CONSTRUi:T/OPERATE/MAINTAIN) d ;r,V,,X/ IL'WE AND ROUTE NUMBER 1 1POLE TYPE 1 MIN.VERT.CLEARANCE LINE A..,;',V /West 99W �URIED TYPE , '. AMBER COUNTY � CABLE 34 =WASHINGTON - e, ,i NEAR LANDMARKS `` II PIPE TYPE L—I LINE .r IV Ell ins Avenue I FEE AMOUNT +k;:..ENCS MAP DESIGNATED FREEWAY IN U.S. FOREST NON-COMMERCI kL Il :6 , H YES 1X1 NO 1 1 YES 1XI NO SIGN ,, "Ip,ME AND ADDRESS MISCELLANEOUS OPERATIONS AND/OR ,,,,t.i.:res LLL 1X1 FACILITIES AS DESCRIBED BELOW • JirnDUS Ave. BOND REQUIRED IEFERENCE. AMOUNT OF BOND ., • . JAR 734.55 OR 97008 X YES NO m3512 52,000.00 INSURANCE REQUIRED REFERENCE: SPECIFIED COMP.DATE ' •-;ors`•.#(503)495-4962 __ DAR 734-55 1115/1004 __ --_. _L,. YES Ir-7__--1 NO X3511L 1 _..�.—. ------ � �-_.��._ DETAIL LOCATION OF FAC(LITY(For more space attach additional sheets) E Ij ENGIN _ S1n4 OF nwv OR DISTANCE FROM BURIED CABLE OR PIPE __ I SPAN MILE I ENGINEERS �-ENGINEERS ANGLE UfCFtOSSiNG -'" C POINT STATION TO STATION CENTER OF PVMT RAN LINE DEPTF NEAT. SIZE AND KIND LENGTH V -- ---- 134+60 T--_— LH i ; „:,i•, AND t.00A'ION OF NON-COMMERCIAL SIGNS OR MISCELLANEOUS OPERATIONS FACILITIES Permit fc r site improvements - ;'.,,:, k, removal of access, curbing, landscaping, etc. Site Plans to be approved by ODO 1. ,',.:,'VISIONS (FOR MORE SPACE ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS) iC CONTROL REQUIRED - OPEN CUTTING OF PAVED OR SURFAC iD AREAS ALLOWED? R 734-55 100(2) NO (OAR ;34-5'i-1000i ‘; (t.`:.-: ,0,AVit-/34-55-0.251611 J NO • 1X YES( OA L;tS1 48 HOURS BEFORE BEGINNING WORK, THE APPLICANT OR HIS CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY i HE DISTRICT i Pi,Lti•ENTATIVE AT TELEPHONE NUMBER: (503) 229-5002 .,,IrAx,A COPY OF THIS PAGE TO THE DISTRICT OFFICE AT: (5031 297-6058 SPECIFY TIME AND DATE IN T,,E SPACE BELOW. F COP'( OF THIS PERMIT AND ALL ATTACHMENTS SHALL BE AVAILABLE AT THE WORK AREA DURING CONSTRUCTION. t. CR5 757.54 TO 757.571 REQUIRES EXCAVATORS TO LOCATE AND PROTECT ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES.YOU MAY BE I--.: LD LIABLE FOR DAMAGES.CALL FOR UTILITY LOCATES. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. 1-800-332-2344 J i ti 1 - ODOT USE ONLY ,. . ! :of'ipiy with permit, attached provisions(5pg.),and approved plans to satisfaction of Distctrict M<ager orrror repEesentative. ;ir- ,l ,t-t compliance shall be removed, repaired to meet ODOT standards,approvalby ,,:,,.a,nt shall call 503-969-1035 for any electrical locates within ODOT's right of way prior to startinf any work. i;reconstruction conference is required before starting work. Please call 503-229-5002 to arrange for a meeting. yf_ PaOPOSED APPLICATION WILL AFFECT THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT, THE APPLICANT SHALL ACQUI 1E THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT ;s•,,,."ra '5 SIGNATURE BEFORE ACQUIRING THE DISTRICT MANAGER'S SIGNATURE.— _-------TC:A.-E a; ;=,� i TITLE VERNMENT OFFICIAL SIGNATURE t f _ —__- ------ - i'TEtE€'HQNE NC uT SIGNATURE — — APPLICATION DATE TITLE I SC-1-1N- -t i i ;.._ ),.m is approved t- t VAL DATE applicant DISTRIC M' 0' R "RESENTA7IVE APE ;pl-atlon is aGProved by the Department,the app' subject c r :terms and provisions contained end attached,and the terms of Oregon Administrative �7/ ' ,. .,,, Drarsion 5b,which is by this reference made a part of this permit, X ' �i � ��i /� »-s4`i7(5-03) �_ 1H: 3 3 : 4 PM NO. 3573 , 10141 itM3rsr.► 1 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR POLELINE, PIPELINE, AND BURIED CABLE PERMITS, & MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS (rev)May 2001 ,- ,.DANT DDHK HIGHWAY 1W MP 10.16 !applicant must call for utility locates before digging (1-800-332-2344). You may be held Ha)le for damages. Pre-marking of d`Sr areas is required. Applicant shall call 503-969-1035 for Electrical locates within ODOT VW, . , .priiicant shall have a copy of this permit and all attachments at the work site. They shall to available to tine District ,,.ca manager or representative at their request. contractor to acknowledge receipt of and review of, by letter, the Oregon Administrative R_Iles(Chapter 734-55)governing �,aneous facilities and operations on the highway right of way as the governing provisions of his permit or agreerrent. ‘:;o tractor io review the Oregon Administrative Rules(Chapter 734 Div 55)governing mis.ellaneous facilities and the highway right of way as the governing provisions of this permit or agreement. WubSite: eo sos.state.or.us/rules/OARS 700/OAR 734/734 055.htral. Access control fence must be maintained during construction and restored to its original oi better condition after ; ..ctic i is complete. permittee shall not use the right of way to display advertising signs or merchandise of any kind. T. stopping and parking of vehicles upon State Highway right of way for the maintenance of adjoining properly or in �t:rce of any business transaction or commercial establishment is strictly prohibited. Ai' lass and small brush within the work area shall be rotary or flail mowed to ground level prior to the beginning of work ;lea a up. Disturbed areas snail be reseeded with grass native to the area in an approp date seeding time. spreading at mud or debris upon any State Highway is strictly prohibited and violation shall be cause for immediate e,,!atic;i of the permit. Clean up shall be at the applicant's expense. The highway shall be cleaned of all dirt and debris at the • each work day, or more frequently if so determined by the District Manager or representative. Perrnittee shall replace anv i,?:dscape vegetation or fences that are destroyed.Any dama)e that is not fully recovered _)d:;)vs (weather permitting)shall be replaced by ODOT at the expense of the permittee. A"plant establishment'shall be ,6:1 to oe part of the planting work to assure satisfactory growth of planted materials. The plant establishment period will ':veer the original planting and all landscape construction has been completed and approves. The length of the o1 1; tint period will be one calendar year or as defined in the Special Provisions. Applicant will install and maintain landscaped area as shown on the attached drawings. P anting shall be limited to low „ ;cbs,grass or flowers that do not attain sufficient height to obstruct clear vision in any cirection. The Commission or Flail have me right to remove said landscaping at any time such removal may appear to the Commission to be in the a.ter st, without liability or loss, injury, or damage or any nature whatsoever. z.� , Gs 'caw =�_L,ti. -c� ►�r\L r. mYnk ODOT REP 1�» Dated-tc, - L.• 3 : 4 PM NO. 3573 �. 1 114 Z 04 3 a L 1 - 2 The work area during construction or maintenance performed under the permit provisions shall be protected in a,dance with the current Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, US Department of iasportation, and the Oregon Department of Transportation supplements thereto. Flaggers must have a card or certificate eating their completion of an approved work zone traffic control course.All traffic control device!,shall be maintained according ATTSSA Quality Standards for Work Zone Traffic Control Devices handbook. C;ontractor to provide a detailed traffic control plan for each phase of the work, showing sig is and cones. Plans to be 1) f-1(1. for approval by the District Manager or representative in advance of construction or maintenance. :J1 damaged or removed highway signs shall be replaced by the applicant. Installation shah be according to MUTCD or District Manager's specification, and shall be completed as soon as possible no later than the end of the work shift. No lane restrictions will be permitted on the roadway during the hours of darkness,on wee(ends, nor between(3:00 AM AM, or 3:00 PM and 6:00 PM (Monday thru Friday)without prior authorization of the Distict Manager or representative. tours 1i work shall be. O site storm drainage shall be controlled within the applicant's property. No blind connections to existing state facilities. xcavatron shall not be done on the ditch slopes.Trench excavation shall either be at ditcl r bottom or outside the ditch ,4i;oL;ounm depth at bottom of ditch-36", minimum depth at the outside of ditch-42".) r `)ray-earth or rock shall be used as fill material and shall slope so as no to change or adversely affect existing drainage. : ?e and seed the finished fill with native grasses to prevent erosion. J. A storm drainage study will be required by a registered engineer meeting the standards of the National Pollution : (.G Plirnination Systems (NPDES)when any of the following conditions apply: pipe is inadequate to seive the developed area, c.pment site is 1 acre or larger in size and directly or indirectly affects state facilities, $;rectea by the District Manager or representative. • Aa; advance deposit of$ _ (Order to Render Service)is required for ODOT H'rdraulics Engineer(Bridge {<<;,) to review and approve storm study calculations. You will be required to provide"on site" retainage for storm water run off that exceeds tha of undeveloped site. Storm drainage study shall be a 10 year, 25 year, 50 year, 100 other. j ( t , ODOT REP F —� �r,t ,.r.,�, 1�� - Yr��f� �-� ,. -� �, � ------ Date 6sL1 .-i 1)0H1< u�* �r-L � 3 : 46PM NO. 3573 11/14 -4AMS0 e, 3 All water discharged to an ODOT drainage system will be treated prior to discharge. All re Guests for connection to an 'Q Corin sewer will meet any requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System that could include: local s ai . icn approval of on site water quality treatment facilities,development of an operation and rr aintenance plan for any on site ality treatment facility as determined by local jurisdiction. V4 TION/CONSTRUCTION Open cutting of pavement shall only be allowed in areas specifically approved by District Manager or representative. r_2 len backfill shall be according to the attached typical drawing, marked as Exhibit B ' cutting of the highway will be allowed with construction in accordance with OAR 734-55-100.All excavation in paved nail be backfilled and the roadway surface patched before the end of each shift. In special cases where steel plates are sad plates shall be pinned and a temporary cold patch applied to the edges. The permittE a shall be fully responsible for and maintenance of temporary patching and steel plating. rnpaction test will be required for each open cut per ODOT Standard specification for f ighway Construction. Tests sr„ed every 50' LF per_2' Lift of a continuous trench by standard AASHTO T99 method.At the discretion of the Manager or representative, results of such test shall be provided to District Manager or representative at applicants' a Control Density Fill(CDF) shall be used as surface back fill material in place of crushed rcck in open trenches that affect -&-vel portions of the highway. A Y4"-0 rock will be used for the aggregate. The amount of concrete used shall not exceed 3%of �n xcura's weight. Maximum compressed strengths must not exceed 100-150 psi. '' . u.-face restoration shall be a minimum of 8”of hot AC, or match existing AC depth,compacted in 2"lifts, whiclever is ti rock shall be from an ODOT Certified material source. area of cut or damaged asphalt shall be restored in accordance with the attached "T" type drawing. For a period of 2 u..i, g the patched paved surface, the applicant shall be responsible for the condition of said pavement patches, and tial time shall repair to the District Manager or representative satisfaction any of the patch(s which become se led, d broken, or otherwise faulty. ovel lay to seal open cut area shall be completed prior to the end of the construction SE ason,or when +nininium allews per ODOT Standard specification for Highway Construction. Typical overlay St all be 1 W deep anti cover the :t. arra from edge of pavement to edge of pavement, .end taper longitudinally 50' : 1". Taper may be adjusted by the Distract a icr as required. For a penod of two years following this patching of the surface,the applicant shall be responsible for the of said pavement patches, during that time shall repair to the District Manager or representative's satisfa,tion any of : icnes which become settled, cracked, broken or otherwise faulty. ifhway crossing shall be bored or jacked. Bore pits shall be located behind ditch line or n areas satisfactory to the OT ce. Unattended pits shall be protected oy a 6-foot fence or shall be backfilled or steel p ated and pinned. r ant ) ODOT REP "\c,1,1/1-;-_. Date V-k,,,;A,,re; LA_K • P : 46PM N0. 3573„ a r 1 3/14 znM3o A. A. 4 3 . Applicant shall install a"tracer wire"or other similar conductive marking tape or device,if it stalling any non-conductive, watable underground facility, to comply with the Oregon Utility Notification Center,One Call Sy;,tem (per OAR 952-01-0070 3.-;. Trench backfill outside of ditch line or in approved areas can be native soil compacted at o'timum moisture in 12" layers to ,sx greater of the maximum density. Nae material found to be unsatisfactory tor compaction shall be disposed of off the proje:t, and granular backfill used. rre.ich backfill in rock slope or shoulder shall be crushed 1"-u or 3/+"-0 size rock compacted at optimum moisture in 12" 95% of maximum density by standard AASHTO T99 method. .3 ',Nhare excavation is on fill slope steeper than 2:1 slope protection shall be used with 4"size rock laid evenly to a minimum -)r 12. yu more than 300'of trench longitudinally along the highway shall be LEFT open at any or le time and no trench shall be open condition overnight. Areas of disturbed cut and fill lopes shall be restored to a condition suitable to the District Manager or representative. •ir.;sion to be inlaid with an acceptable rip rap material. ,riderground utilities shall be installed with a 3°or more clearance from existing or cont act plans guardrail post and :.;:°;eniAll non-metallic water, sanitary and storm sewer pipe shall have an electrically condictive insulated 12-guage copper .4 re ie full length of the installed pipe using blue wire for water and green for storm and sat iitary sewer piping. area of cut or damaged concrete shall be restored in accordance with the attached Ty pical Section-Pipe Section sic pedestals shah be placed as near the highway right-of-way line as practical. In :ro case shall pedestals and line ocated within the highway maintenance area. No cable plowing is allowed within the lateral support of the highway asphalt(i.e. at 6' low;r than the edge of the asphalt, c.E i, .1 with 9'of the edge of the asphalt). iipe and bridge attachment hardware shall be submitted to the ODOT Operations Stru aural Coatings Coordinator for .. a r Expansion joints of an ODOT approved type to be located in the closed proximity with the expansion joints of he ODOT Bridge Office Practice Manual attached. Aoesiue anchors only are acceptable for support brackets. For a list of acceptable adhesive anchors or more information, .: ODO!. 3ndge Office Practice Manual. , al icant 1DOT REP /l �' ; , !'I(�� -_.gate 1 0—C3 i >. 1 3 3 : 47PM NO. 357314/14 ,G. A t e, v u 1 1 s Field drilled holes in the stiffeners and areas damaged by drill shall be painted with two wilts of zinc-rich primer prior to e 'n iy. Methods shall be approved by ODOT Operations Structural Coatings Coordinator. Neoprene gaskets to be placed between the mounting plates and stiffeners. ODOT Bridge Office Practice Manual '.a.iicarit shall be responsible and liable for(1)investigating presence/absence of any legally protected or regulated - ;, ;i+ental resource(s) in the action area; (2)determining any and all restrictions or requirements that relate to the proposed :. ; and complying with such, including bur not limited to those relating to hazardous material(.;), water quality constraints, ir;s, a.cheological or historic resources(s) state and federal threatened or endangered species,etc; (3)complying with all a:, state, and local laws, and obtaining all required and necessary permits and approvals. tr., applicant impacts a legally protected/regulated resource, applicant/permittee shall be responsible for all costs L.;.sited with such impact, including, but not limited to all costs of mitigation and rehabilitation, aid shall indemnify, and hold r: isS ODOT for such impacts and be responsible and liable to ODOT for any costs or claims tf at ODOT may have. ,.i `Hails are approved in general only and do not relieve the applicant from completing the co istruction improvements -, .;: ,-,7to to ODOT, Field changes may be required by the District Manager or representative.Wlen revisions are made in the r,u,r(i awings will be submitted to the District Office. t - —-k-,v, •�• fesi Y\(,,j� Y ry,b,4, ODOT Rep. 41(.' a'' ate —10—C3 IG;z,ili D o IA lc, V--e v-Av r.4. i / LLC. �i 8/4/03 � Conditions Associated With 12:08:47PM ' TC�M DETER SEMAS, INCK Case #: SDR2003-00005 Condition Status Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Date By 1 ACCESS POINT JOINT USE DOCUMNTATN None Met MAS 8/4/03 MAS 1. Provide documentation in the form of deeds,easements, leases or contracts that establish joint use of the existing access point. 1 CROSS-OVER EASEMENTS None Met 8/4/03 MAS 8/4/03 MAS 2. Provide cross over easements for the three(3)parcels that are associated with the proposal. 1 ODOT APPROACH ROAD PERMIT None Met 8/4/03 MAS 8/4/03 MAS 3. Provide documentation that an Oregon Department of Transportation(ODOT)Approach Road Permit has been acquired. 1 PACIFIC HWY. STREET TREE PLAN None Met MAS 8/4/03 MAS 4. Provide a plan showing street trees along SW Pacific Highway in accordance with Section 18.745.040.0(Size and Spacing of Street Trees). 1 PFI PERMIT None NOT MET KSM 7/24/03 PLL 5. Prior to issuance of a site permit,a Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit is required for this project to cover the sewer and water connections and any other work in the public right-of-way(ROW). Six(6)sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards,which are available at City Hall and the City's web page(www.ci.tigard.or.us). 1 PFI PERMIT FINANCIAL ASSURANCE None NOT MET KSM 7/24/03 PLL 6. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name,address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee",and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specify if the entity is a corporation, limited partnership,LLC,etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 1 OR. HWY. DIVISION SITE PERMIT None NOT MET KSM 7/24/03 PLL 7. Prior to issuance of the site permit,the applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division,to perform work in the right-of-way of Highway 99W. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department. 1 ODOT APPROVED ACCESS PERMIT COPY None NOT MET KSM 7/24/03 PLL 8. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall provide the City Engineering Department a copy of the ODOT approved access permit. 1 ODOT APPROVAL-STORM H2O DETENTIO None NOT MET KSM 7/24/03 PLL 9. Prior to issuance of the site permit,the City Engineering Department must receive confirmation of ODOT approval of the stormwater detention system. 1 ON-SITE H2O QUALITY FACILITY None NOT MET KSM 7/24/03 PLL 10. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards(adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department(Kim McMillan)for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition,a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 1 EROSION CONTROL PLAN None NOT MET KSM 7/24/03 PLL 1 1. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement(PFI)permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, December 2000 edition." I MIXED SOLID WASTE& RECYCLABLES None Met 8/4/03 MAS 8/4/03 MAS 12. Address one(1)of the four(4)methods of mixed solid waste and recyclable storage according to Section 18.755.040(Methods of Demonstrating Compliance). 1 DESIGN STDS. FOR WASTE/RECYCLABLE None Met 8/4/03 MAS 8/4/03 MAS 13. Provide information regarding the design standards of the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables section of the Tigard Development Code(TDC). Page 1 oft CaseConditions..rpt 11 See item 6 above. The following conditions shall be satisfied prior to issuance of the Building Permit. Planning Division: 12 The garbage enclosure (mixed solid waste and recyclable storage) used is the Minimum Standards Method: Office = 4/1,000 sf. (4 sf. required); Service/retail = 10/1,000 sf. (20 sf. required) plus 10 = 34 sf. required. Actual area = 112 sf. 13 18.755.50 Location, Design and Access Standards for Storage Areas Location Standards: 1 The garbage enclosure (GE) is large enough to accommodate both garbage and recyclables and has one location next to the building. 2 The exterior GE does comply with the UBC and UFC. 3 The GE has one exterior location (none interior). 4 The GE is located at the back of the building and is not in a setback or adjacent to the public street. 5 The GE is located next to the main rear exit of the building and is well lighted. 6 The GE is adjacent to the parking lot and is screened with chain link gates and slats and has three sides of CMU walls. 7 The GE is located to be accessible to the collection vehicles. Design Standards: 1 The GE is configured to meet current standard container sizes. 2 The GE containers will be purchased to meet UFC standards and be covered. 3 The GE is enclosed with three sides of 6'-0" high CMU walls and has chain link gates with slats. The gates (together) are approximately 14'-0" wide. 4 The containers will be labeled by the Owner Access Standards: 1 The GE is located to meet all of the security and convenience criteria for all people needing access to it. 2 The GE is located to provide the best access for the vehicles needing access for both horizontal and vertical clearances (it is out in the open). 3 The GE is located at the rear of the building and is not close to the public street. C:\Odocuments\PROJECTS\Quiklube\Chcksht2.Doc Conditions Associated With TIDEMARK Case #: SDR2003-00005 COMPITER SYSTEMS, INC. Condition Status Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Date By 1 2 ADDITIONAL PARKING STALLS None Met 8/4/03 MAS 8/4/03 MAS 14. Provide an additional two(2)parking stalls. 1 WHEEL STOPS FOR 3 PKNG. STALLS None Met 8/4/03 MAS 8/4/03 MAS 15. Provide and implement a plan showing the proposed three(3)parking stalls located on the boarder of the subject site to be fit with wheel stops that are at least four(4) inches high, located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. 1 LIGHTING PLAN None NOT MET MAS 7/24/03 PLL 16. Submit a lighting plan to be approved by Jim Wolf of the Tigard Police Department. 1 COMPLETE WORK IN PUBLIC ROW None NOT MET KSM 7/24/03 PLL 17. Prior to a final building inspection,the applicant shall complete any work in the public right-of-way(or public easement)and obtain approval from the Engineering Department. 1 H2O QUALITY FAC. DESIGN ENGINEER None NOT MET KSM 7/24/03 PLL 18. To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards,the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection,the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard(Inspection Supervisor)with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. Staff Contact: Hap Watkins, Building Division. 1 STORM H2O MGMT. MAINT. AGREEMENT None NOT MET KSM 7/24/03 PLL 19. Prior to a final building inspection,the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer,for the proposed onsite storm water treatment facility. 1 FINAL SIGHT DISTANCE CERTIFICATIO None NOT MET KSM 7/24/03 PLL 20. Prior to a final building inspection,the applicant's engineer shall provide a final sight distance certification. 1 SIDEWALK&CURB TO ODOT STANDARL None NOT MET KSM 7/24/03 PLL 21. Prior to final approval, sidewalk and curb must be constructed according to ODOT standards. Page 2 of 2 CaseConditions..r \v ') `c- [ r / (1,c)' `.\ ,.-- Aci,,,,, ,,,# 5 \) v\ ` TYPICAL �rL, ;'shy ;'shy) /) 1,-,7---,...... \ AA 1 <� q 0 A �v� \\ C- ,,-. d) '<5\- . \'-------0,), ....-Ai:illik 8\ I „\ \ „' � - \ \\ '-. --)7, \K' 7 ..',/' , *,,, 2- 0 \ \\\ ,,,,,,,,, ,,,,:\ /( , ,�=LOPED AREA \ ` J TYP. ` ' ` sED PER L-1 ) ( \ << c• .772'C \a \ 0 , L-,,,..• ,..0 -57, (in' (<-\ " A\ 'f. \.1 \ • /4,,,- .,,, „ '0\ ..--^ '-'0\ -1„, , (.., '0.• °(-----,-\(- 0 \\\ „.„.6,,, ,,,ii„) , .0 , \ \ D (--) .'.- -- PAVING TO REMAIN 40.0 t "P -------,C) 46#0\ "; i vv 13 ti5. 9 9TYP. \ - - _�/ A \\ 760 •— — - -1 - - 77 CP 1 C C ZO\ E -5,..) ,0_. I , • 1 16 ► 0 ® o S-Y,--) .°' / Kil,_ CC �'- <-1- w I LARGE PLANS FOR THIS FILE ARE IN THE RECORDS ROOM