Loading...
City Council Packet - 08/22/2017 Ili • City of Tigard TIG © Tigard Business Meeting—Agenda TIGARD CITY COUNCIL& LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE AND TIME: August 22,2017 - 6:30 p.m. Study Session;7:30 p.m. Business Meeting MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard-Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available,ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Citizen Communication items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager. Times noted are estimated;it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda items can be heard in any order after 7:•30 p.m. Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 503-718-2419, (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request,the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments;and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers,it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-718-2410 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). SEE ATTACHED AGENDA VIEW LIVE VIDEO STREAMING ONLINE: http://live.tigard-or.gov CABLE VIEWERS:The regular City Council meeting is shown live on Channel 28 at 7:30 p.m.The meeting will be rebroadcast at the following times on Channel 28: Thursday 6:00 p.m. Sunday 11:00 a.m. Friday 10:00 p.m. Monday 6:00 a.m. City of'Tigard TIGARD Tigard Business Meeting—Agenda '. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL& LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE AND TIME: August 22,2017 - 6:30 p.m. Study Session;7:30 p.m. Business Meeting MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard-Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 6:30 PM •STUDY SESSION •EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive Session is called to order,the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute.All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. A. BRIEFING FROM METRO ON COMMERCIAL FOOD SCRAPS POLICY 6:30 p.m. estimated time B. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS 6:50 p.m. estimated time 7:30 PM 1. BUSINESS MEETING A. Call to Order B. Roll Call C. Pledge of Allegiance D. Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 2. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION (Two Minutes or Less,Please) A. Follow-up to Previous Citizen Communication B. Citizen Communication—Sign Up Sheet 3. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion.Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: A. CONSIDER APPOINTMENT OF SCHUYLER WARREN AS THE CDBG POLICY ADVISORY BOARD STAFF ALTERNA 1'h FOR TIGARD B. PROCLAIM CONSTITUTION WEEK FOR SEPTEMBER 17-23, 2017 •Consent Agenda-Items Removed for Separate Discussion:Any items requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion will be considered immediately after the Council/City Center Development Agency has voted on those items which do not need discussion. 4. SYS l'EM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES (SDC) PROJECT UPDATE 7:35 p.m. estimated time 5. INFORMATIONAL PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDER VACATION OF 74TH AVENUE RIGHT OF WAY,VAC2017-00001 8:05 p.m. estimated time 6. LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD: CONSIDERATION OF CONTRACT AWARD FOR MAIN STREET AT FANNO CREEK PROPERTIES DEMOLITION 8:10 p.m. estimated time 7. NON AGENDA ITEMS 8. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive Session is called to order, the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute.All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 9. ADJOURNMENT 8:15 p.m. estimated time City of Tigard Tigard City Council Meeting Agenda TIG RD. August 22, 2017 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION A. METRO PRESENTATION ON FOOD WASTE RECYCLING IN TIGARD 6:30 p.m. estimated time Assistant City Manager Zimmerman will introduce Metro staff. Metro Councilor Craig Dirksen, Metro Senior Public Affairs Coordinator Ken Ray and Metro Senior Planner Jennifer Erickson will give a presentation. B. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS 6:50 p.m. estimated time The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive Session is called to order, the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute. All discussions are confidential and those present my disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Sessions may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. Administrative Items: ❑ Discuss upcoming City Council Outreach Event at Friday's Movie in the Park Council Meeting Calendar August 1* Tuesday Council Busincss Meeting 6:30 p.m.,Town Hall Cancelled,National Night Out 8* Tuesday Council Business Meeting- 6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 15* Tucsday Council Workshop Mccting 6:30 p.m.,Town I lall Cancelled 22* Tuesday Council Business Meeting- 6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 25 Friday Council Outreach at Movie in the Park,Time 7:00 p.m.,Metzger School Park, 10350 SW Lincoln Street. September 5* Tuesday Council Business Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 12* Tuesday Council Workshop Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 19* Tuesday Council Workshop Mccting 6:30 p.m.,Town Hall Cancelled 26* Tuesday Council Business Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall October 3* Tuesday Council Business Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 10*Tuesday Council Business Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 17*Tuesday Council Workshop Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 24*Tuesday Council Business Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall November 7* Tuesday Council Business Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 10*Tuesday Council Business Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 17*Tuesday Council Workshop Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall 24*Tuesday Council Business Meeting—6:30 p.m.,Town Hall Regularly scheduled Council meetings are marked with an asterisk (*) AIS-3234 A. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 08/22/2017 Length (in minutes): 20 Minutes Agenda Title: Metro Briefing on Commercial Food Scraps Policy Prepared For: Marty Wine, City Management Submitted By: Marty Wine, City Management Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: Council Business Mtg - Study Sess. Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Receive a briefing and provide Tigard's input about Metro's proposed policy for mandatory food scrap collection for businesses. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Consider the proposed policy and its implications for solid waste franchising in Tigard, and provide input to Metro. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY Food is the single largest portion of garbage that the region throws away every year, and according to Metro, 55 percent of food that is thrown away comes from businesses. Metro currently has a voluntary program to collect food scraps from businesses, and the program has not achieved the desired outcomes of keeping most food out of landfills. Additionally, Metro is considering how to develop a more robust food scrap collection program and the needed facilities to handle them. The Metro Council will consider a mandatory food scrap collection policy in fall of 2017 for larger restaurants, grocery stores, food manufacturers, and food-generating businesses. Metro has an interest in understanding from businesses and cities (which grant the solid waste franchises to haulers) what the implications of a mandatory policy may be. Metro's Senior Public Affairs Coordinator Ken Ray and Senior Planner Jennifer Erickson, and Metro Councilor Craig Dirksen will attend to discuss Metro's proposed commercial food scraps collection policy with the City Council. There will be a PowerPoint presentation. OTHER ALTERNATIVES COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION N/A Attachments Food Scraps Q&A AlPk March 2017 Solid Waste Roadmap Metro Food Scraps Project Q&A: Elected Officials Public benefits About 40 percent of the food in the U.S. is wasted. That waste comes at all stages of of a regional the food system: at the farm, in transport, at wholesalers and retailers, and at solid waste home. Despite the region's waste prevention and donation efforts, we still send to system landfills the equivalent of 5,000 long-haul trucks full of nothing but food every Through its year. management of the regional solid Why food scraps? waste system, • Food is the largest component of what the region throws out as garbage. It is 18 Metro seeks to: percent of our overall disposed waste. Businesses are responsible for over half of • Protect that total. people's health • It's not only the quantity of food scraps that is driving the region's interest in • Protect the environment recovering them. Landfills are significant emitters of greenhouse gases (GHG), and • Get good value food scraps are a primary contributor to the production of methane in landfills. for the public's Methane is a very potent GHG-24 times that of CO2. money • The goal of collecting food scraps is to capture the environmental and economic • Keep our commitment benefits of turning that material into useful products,creating energy,supporting to the highest local agriculture and residential gardening while reducing the negative and best use of environmental impacts associated with disposal. Putting food scraps in the garbage materials • Be adaptable is a missed opportunity to capture these benefits and make the most of our waste. and responsive • This isn't just a local issue.The state of Oregon recognizes the importance of keeping in managing food out of our landfills and established a wasted food recovery goal of 25% by materials • Ensure services 2020. In addition,the state recently amended existing recycling laws to encourage are available to local governments to implement programs that increase the recovery of food all types of scraps. customers Why focus on businesses? • Businesses in the region throw away approximately 100,000 tons of food per year— which represents 55 percent of the total food that is disposed in the Metro region. • The overall greenhouse gas emissions benefit of recovering just half of the food waste from businesses rather than sending it to the landfill is equivalent to removing 3,000 cars from the road or saving over 1.6 million gallons of gasoline. • In addition,food scraps from businesses tend to be cleaner, concentrated in larger quantities and come from a smaller set of sources rather than spread across a broad population like with individual households. For example,the majority of food scraps in the region are produced by about 2,700 businesses. By comparison, residential food scraps are spread across the region's approximately 675,000 households. Why mandatory food scraps collection? • Our voluntary program for collecting food scraps from businesses has resulted in slow growth and has not enabled the region to secure a stable, local processing facility. In order to create a sustainable business, processing facilities need a large and reliable supply of food scraps. oregonmetro.gov 1 Shouldn't businesses donate food instead? • Yes,definitely. Good food that has been stored properly and is fit for human consumption should be donated. Local governments can help businesses set up donation programs at the same time as setting up programs to collect scraps. Most businesses that donate food also have other food scraps--this requirement is focused on those food scraps that are not edible and cannot be donated such as trimmings, bones,shells,coffee grounds,food preparation waste and plate scrapings.The prevention of food waste and the donation of edible food are and will continue to be the region's highest priority. How will this affect businesses? • Businesses in the region are already required to have systems in place to recycle items like paper and plastic, metal and glass containers. Metro is considering implementing a similar requirement for food scraps from medium and large-sized businesses that process, cook or sell food. • Local governments provide technical assistance to hundreds of businesses a year to help set up waste reduction and recycling programs. We will continue and enhance that assistance for food businesses. How many businesses will be affected? • The first group of businesses to be affected is about 850 of the region's largest food producers such as grocery stores, large restaurants and cafeterias. Another 750 businesses will be brought in after a period of time, and then the last group of about 1,000.The actual number of businesses,dates and time frame between each group is still being refined in consideration of business needs and operations and our capacity to help each group get set up appropriately. It will take a few years. How many businesses currently participate? • About 1,250 businesses of all types and sizes are currently recovering food scraps.This number includes businesses that may not be required to participate in the proposed required program due to their size or the fact that they are not food businesses(such as offices). What are the challenges for a business? • Many of the businesses that would be included in this requirement are operating on tight margins and are already affected by other regulations. Metro and local governments in the region will provide businesses with on-site assistance to help with training, provide containers and facilitate appropriate collection schedules to keep transition costs down. What will it cost? • As with any new program,there will be associated costs. Metro Council directed staff to look at the financial implications and evaluate ways to minimize cost burden.This is a challenging process,will take some time and costs may change as the system matures and stabilizes. • Costs will also be determined by market conditions and city and county rate setting processes. It will be influenced by many factors,some of which include the number of participants,the distance to transfer stations,and processing fees. • Metro will examine its role in controlling costs such as what is charged when food scraps are delivered to transfer stations,where the food scraps are delivered and the fees charged by the processing facility. 2 What do businesses think? • In September 2016,a series of interviews and surveys were conducted with businesses in the region but outside of Portland.The participants were businesses currently participating in food scraps collection service, businesses that previously participated but stopped and those that were offered the service but declined it. ➢ Nearly 45%of businesses were in favor of a mandatory program that had everyone participating, 15% had no strong concerns and would comply is required,30% had some concerns about how it would work but were not opposed,and 10%were opposed. ➢ The on-site assistance,containers and training materials were highly valued by participants. ➢ Cost neutrality,space constraints, labor and concerns about cleanliness were biggest concerns for non-participants. ➢ Most commonly, businesses said they wanted to reduce the garbage sent to the landfill and do something good for the environment.Saving money was not a priority, but keeping costs close to neutral was important. ➢ Larger businesses saw greater positive financial outcomes of participation. • Metro staff is talking with food industry businesses,trade groups and local government partners to inform our planning process and design a system to best meet the needs of businesses and local governments. Our goal is to reduce the barriers and address the concerns of those affected while ensuring we can keep as much of this valuable material out of landfills and put to better use. Isn't the methane gas emitted from the landfill being captured and used to generate electricity?Why do we need to treat our food separately if we are already capturing the methane? • Yes, landfill methane capture systems are in many landfills. However,these systems vary greatly in their efficiency and ability to capture gases. Even among landfills with the best gas collection systems,some methane escapes to the atmosphere,where it contributes to climate change. Methane is a very potent greenhouse gas (34 times more powerful than carbon dioxide over a 100 year time horizon). • The Oregon Department of Environmental Quality completed a comprehensive study in 2014 on the climate, energy and soils impacts of four different food scraps management systems (composting, digestion technology, in-sink disposals, and landfill). In all but one of six evaluation category, landfill ranked lowest. It ranked second lowest in energy production and capture. Will building more compost facilities result in more odor issues? • Compost facilities, like many other types of natural and industrial processes do produce odors. The goal of this work is to attract the development of a food scraps processing facility suitable for an urban or suburban environment, meaning it is highly unlikely that there will be any new outdoor food scraps composting facilities built in the Metro region. It is more likely that our food scraps will be processed in an anaerobic digester which is an industrial facility that uses an enclosed tank system to capture and store gas for energy and produces a liquid and solid fertilizer that can be used in agriculture. • Metro is in the process of procuring a facility to serve the region over the long term. Nine companies have been pre-qualified for this important work. We expect to know what kind of facility this will be and where it will be located by the end of 2017. 3 What kinds of products will get made from the food scraps collected and how will they be used? • Depending on the technology chosen to manage our food scraps, products could include electricity,vehicle fuel, natural gas, liquid fertilizer,solid fertilizer and compost. Most of these products are of value to many industries including agriculture, construction,vehicle fleets and utilities. In addition,the natural fertilizers and composts help to retain our rich soil health, prevent erosion, increase crop yields and productivity which help support our important agricultural markets. What about residential food scraps collection? • The focus for Metro right now is on recovering those concentrated amounts of food scraps coming from businesses.This does not detract from the importance of keeping all food scraps out of the landfill. A few local cities in the region either currently offer or are considering adding food scraps to yard debris collection programs. Residential food scraps and yard debris are typically composted at different facilities than the food scraps coming from businesses. Metro supports this effort. Do other communities have mandatory programs like the one being proposed? • Yes.There are six states and 13 municipalities that have some sort of mandatory program or ban on the disposal of food in the landfill. Metro has learned a lot from studying these other programs.Aside from the environmental benefits, many programs have also seen other positive trends such as increased donations of good food to food banks. For more information,contact: Pam Peck at pam.peck@oregonmetro.gov or Jennifer Erickson at jennifer.erickson@oregonmetro.gov or visit www.oregonmetro.gov/foodscraps. 4 SUPPLp EMENTAL PACLK4ET VQ \ . . . t N ' .- :- ' - '' r--r N.) 01:1 i= ,,,o ' _ N) Q `� .., ,— , y 4iit .. .... . , .A . , _ , 1, -_: , _ s ti, t O + tii v% 3' a i. `" - Cip t . e 1s r .. I € ,_ ° N t - t '., - . ,'', , 111) ' t Tf 1 '* °fri 1.,..4'' .4 :**' v''' '''' ' ''*'' cp C - „.,. ,•......:..4..., „. , , ,.,,,,,,„, ,,,,, ,„ ,,,, , ,grif.'-,.°: s r 4as r` -,.. atylit. . _ 1I3! Why Food? Metro Region Disposed Recoverables 20% 18% p- 16% 5,000 long- 14% haul trucks 12% per year full of 10% just food 8% 6% 4% 2% Lii OW_ Food Paper Wood Metal Plastic Yard Glass Debris x < f s. :v� r - # G'a F 'lam _ ,t ^� _ t .,$ x 3 <,1. aiime. 1.:;57'1....:1P .sh , CO.s ti K ,. t'r g a; 1 4' a ,t' ,w4::_------,:i--.4#° ` ;......,..r..., k _ , , .. g +'S-, # :.}� r { <#+T ` ' fit'} S ,. .. , , . .... .,, , , -4.1':i-,-,--2 i.' ^ .. kms t r l',: '5 ''_,..,..'7.7. a i , . i --,,'_•ki: .:,. -,L, ,A.•‘•••:,.:_L.i..,C.-L.7...,-;::::.' •,--t*,.:•L.L-'1. ;.•-:r:-, "....--,,L.f. '.°- xF o, t! -' ,-' "4 ", N t, to i' .� s., ...j ., . ,,..;, - 1 . ...,!.*: ' -''-'-'. ''‘.::1 .....41 ,_.,,,...0,..:j.,, i .,,.. i?0--,.. -;"I:'IA. / C 14 >,-.1 Sik3 !. �' not Residential Commercial o Not these wC3 40, o 5o 010 r \ _ _ 11110110 ki AI rci-m j PYA . A.. it These foodmilk,, ''' -pe", scraps -tib H 4 This work isn't new • 1993: Metro workshop to develop strategies for Organic Waste • 1994: Metro conference follow up to 1993 workshop • 1995: RFP for Phase I Food Waste Collection & Processing • 1996: RFP for Phase 2 Food Waste Collection & Processing • 1999: AOR Organics Forum: Portland discusses mandatory • 2000: Metro & Portland convene processing roundtable, Metro RFP • 2001: City of Portland issues RFP • 2002: Metro matching grant program & site search • 2003: Metro Organic Waste Infrastructure Development Grant • 2004: RFP for combined transportation & processing services • 2004-present: Metro provides funding to support local program development • 2005: Food scraps collection program begins in Portland • 2010: SWAC engagements specific to Food System • 2009: PRC begins accepting food scraps • 2010: Recology takes over contract for processing • 2010: Nature's Needs begins accepting food scraps • 2011: SWAC recommends the region move to mandatory if benchmarks not met • 2012: Roadmap Food Scraps Project begins • 2013: Nature's Needs closes to commercial food scraps • 2013: JC Biomethane begins processing the region's food scraps Metro Council Direction To achieve the objectives of increasing recovery and attracting stable, local processing capacity: 1 . Require certain businesses to separate their food scraps for recovery, eventually ban disposal of food . 2 . Determine how to efficiently collect and deliver food scraps for processing. 3 . Secure local and stable processing capacity. Staff Actions : Recovery Financial Signals Does Council / want to accelerate YES Required Recovery Mandatory food scraps. recovery? �r Policy and Financial Signals Disposal Ban and Required Recovery Cost Mitigation Options a��a r,r.;rr.n„ .�-•s�w�+r .,�t:,:: rfft�7i�i�`"U 7 Policy context • There are approximately 67,000 businesses in the Metro region . • About 7,000 of those are food-oriented . • About 3,000 would be affected by the policy (4% of the region's businesses) . • Over 1, 300 are participating already. 8 What will thisdo ? policy • Requires local governments inside the Metro boundary to implement collection programs . • Affects "3,000 large to medium-sized food- oriented businesses . / . M, 7 • Phasedinover5years . • y , �y • • • • :.4. - .-." '` L yew 3 • ,. • Will eventually prohibit / - * ' , .t4 -: .. . ; *t ` large �� wt 'the disposal of . � . . . ' ' -- - . amounts of food • .1 �' 9,: "x"'71!'`2",-1"`" -. Draft policy elements • Local Governments must adopt policy that meets the regional requirements and performance standards, including : — Send notice to affected businesses — Require businesses to separate food from other waste — Provide educational materials, program setup assistance — Ensure collection service is provided — Enforcement, grant waivers, reporting • Metro will continue to provide funding support. 10 Policy implementation phases • Local Government adoption (July 2018) __ __ _ __,.........._„, • Phase 1 begins ( March 2019 ) ► 0,-,IT _ _. • Phase 2 begins ( March 2020) C3 • Phase 3 begins (Sep . 2021 ) � ,. 1 - ""'" FO ,, ,,,, OD ONLY FOOD ONLY- -- "�• Disposal ban effective ( 2023 ) �� ti.. 11 Exemptions and Waivers For Governments : • Outside the Metro boundary exemption . • Business quantity minimum threshold waiver. • Distance (to transfer or processing) waiver. For Businesses : • Local governments may grant temporary compliance waivers. 12 What does this mean for Tigard ? r'd133 businesses would be affected overall . • Phase 1 ( 2019) : ^'37 businesses • Phase 2 ( 2020) : "'57 businesses • Phase 3 ( 2021 ) •. a '•.,'^Y`^4r."++....p"9 ,l1 /ill .LJ'i nem(INI1 FOOD ONLrt �'39 schools & businesses What have businesses told us ? _. .,,,.., • On-site assistance is key, as ._„ .... i is reliable collection ,. 1 service . i ...,,,id _ • 90% not opposed to a - ...„41 mandatory • , „. _. ..., ...„,„• 45% infavor. Aa, • 30% had some concerns . 51L,.......„,vncr � • Phase-in is critical . Policy Process Timeline First Draft of Second draft Jul 2018: Winter/Spring Admin. Rules of Admin. Local 2016-17: 30 day Rules 30 day government Develop draft comment comment policy policy period period adoption Summer 2017: Fall: Enacting Winter: March 2019 Stakeholder ordinance to Admin. Rule Implementation engagement: Metro adoption Begins Policy Concept Council Businesses, local elected officials, chambers, industry organizations, etc. 15 What' s Next? Metro: • Secure a processing facility • Continue stakeholder engagement • Public comment on draft administrative rules (2 rounds) • Identify measures to minimize costs • Continue to provide financial support for local government business assistance staff Local Governments: • Aim for consistent rate structures and service levels • Ensure collection service is more widely available • Participate in stakeholder engagement and policy development • Bolster food donation efforts • Continue refining assistance to businesses 16 Thank you Jennifer Erickson Metro 503.797. 1647 Jennifer.erickson@oregonmetro.gov AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 B - CITIZEN COMMUNICATION DATE: August 22, 2017 (Limited to 2 minutes or less,please) The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda and items on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony becomes part of the public record The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record NAME,ADDRESS & PHONE TOPIC STAFF Please Print CONTACTED n Name: PW4A `A .C1i/-Q/,lekt v t Also,please spel your name as it sounds,if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: acAct vceil Address 1 .6,,,ca svalimbir l tr(cit ep City �I ' I ("" . l T State ,Zip p � Z2 Phone No.g� Name: l�4'VV Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will 6 - v help the presiding officer pronounce: • Vc VY\?A4LA.-1 Address V&d S l'7° ' rVW &e. 9( City �� - p ' -D �p' � State t✓Iv Zip \1i-i7 Phone No. Name: Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Address City State Zip _ Phone No. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION I:\ADM\CITY RECORDERS\000 City Recorder-Records Resources and Policies\CCSignup\citizen communication 170822.doc SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET FOR 2(3- g/? -1'7 C�tcj m (DATE OF MEETING) I am here tonight to speak on behalf of many residents of Summer Crest, Manzanita, 1 14th PI, and 116th Ave in response to the asphalt rubber chip seal that was applied to our streets on August 7th. As residents of Tigard, we all pay the same flat rate $6.56 Street Maintenance Fee monthly on our utility bill, although we received a product that was 1/5 the cost of other residential streets in similar condition. Many children on our streets are afraid or unable to ride their bikes, scooters on their neighborhood streets as they once did. When a child falls, there is now greater injury due to the rough surface left by the application of this product. I dropped in at the end of the last Budget and Brews session, where Marissa Grass, Public Works, told me that the streets receiving the pilot project were not in good enough condition to receive the slurry seal, and would have needed the pavement overlay, if not the pilot project. Mike McCarthy, Sr. Project Engineer sent me an email today stating that the normal surface treatment for residential streets is a slurry seal. However the following residential streets, some of which are less trafficked than portions of Summer Crest, received the pavement overlay. Additionally, they all had existing sidewalks. Not all of the streets impacted by the pilot project have sidewalks. Greenfield Dr Benchview Terr to Gaarde St Complete Benchview Terr Clearview Way to Greenfield Dr Complete Viewmount Lane 114th Ave to 115th Ave Complete 114th Ave Viewmount Ln to south of Fairhaven St Complete Viewmount Ct 114th Ave to end Complete 96th Ave Sattler St to Murdock St Complete Kable St 98th Ave to 100th Ave Complete 109th Ave Highland Dr to Naeve St Complete In no way did the city reach out to us as residents to inform us this was a pilot project. This has left residents misinformed, and now frustrated. We demand a response by the city as to how this will be addressed. Mr. Mayor, your response to my email that you are sorry my walks aren't as enjoyable as they used to be not only insulted me, but is counter productive to the city's strategic plan to make Tigard the most walkable city in the PNW. I am presenting 56 signatures tonight to demonstrate the frustration of the residents receiving the failed pilot project and prepared to present more if the problems are not addressed. Thank you for listening to our concerns and your timely attention to the matter. t SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET We,the residents of Summer Crest, Manzanita, 114th PI, and 116th Ave., petition the City of Tigard to fix our neighborh•• reets. bn August 7th, an Asphalt Rubber Chip Seal was applied to our streets, making them unsafe for children to ride bikes, scooters, etc... and limiting residents from walking their pets as previously done, due to a lack of sidewalks in the area. All Tigard residents pay a $6.56/month Street Maintenance Fee, however, we received a product that was 1/5 the cost of other neighborhoods and the end result displays this. In signing this petition, I demand that the city respond to this problem and provide clear communication with the residents as to next steps. Name Address Signature ii Co 2..0 5i.A.) --re3a_r a Mc V? . Naa i-rva J it?X yt5.f?il i 0 11:Awl 'dk 11670 so 11/ ilvE or� 6e tit.._ , /c„.....),..e......._ 'Sv w k ) 16a5 I I bfh Y -n tie� Sw I� � 444...44A Jfrç yo o I I ba 6S1),) / / GIt Are. Tr gi c` q✓a1 T� i`te ltratdm. (17 4:0 5i j / 1- 4A` --r, 1 ii •, Atli AZ I La 1/ S ••.S / , `07fir KfalliirL _ 11 r er 14,Det 2 talikt 'a2t3 IhSS S•w. iI DI ?IG Trzz3• �s S-�,rr �,o �pS�, t 1 to oo SG,) rnUh tinC) •�9 i23 ilk • TitiAtitiLA--- Ä'zLc 4W. AfQ v P g le' -IZ A. , St\h/VK ictOt-efr itia05 S(k) ManUthf 44 V"q--42z$ 0 er' 1 1 ' .1.17?2,0taa(,/ A-aiLliv G— - I U i s 3.w Mhuretrrr- 1-4-. �. 49115 • ' Zi2/yrteX Xeil#1/ /-791-4111,04?/%417), fie dkn SCJa.Nn . niluiv, /al _it) Sew.w4e/r'et451- fr. de lif\, wtc-o✓ 4t.4.4....v "....ii,. Jp{,sory 'RING, D330 So SvmmerGre S-tbr, We,the residents of Summer Crest, Manzanita, 114th PI, and 116th Ave., petition the City of Tigard to fix our neighborhood streets. On August 7th, an Asphalt Rubber Chip Seal was applied to our streets, making them unsafe for children to ride bikes, scooters, etc... and limiting residents from walking their pets as previously done, due to a lack of sidewalks in the area. All Tigard residents pay a $6.56/month Street Maintenance Fee,, however, we received a product that was 1/5 the cost of other neighborhoods and the end result displays this. In signing this petition, I demand that the city respond to this problem and provide clear communication with the residents as to next steps. Name Address Signature Citi t.✓ Ik2'zrc" Su) S Ctnes+ a,_ ' Of r;--r 2 fi L ,. l �1f� -i:-.Vi, f/8 f f � w►,� Cv� Rht1Acl lll0W \ern bel akN •i IL-Wk &Gig. Puiasc g )10,10 .5", »mm flits ; ..5T OR, / ; C \ kI3 e,.SS 1NCW> SV.) Sc,,c o."-cc e st ,Z., J � Q U7c�'l� 0 i 15 5t �Scc.puv u2 L c.. D r I; l � 9-� Lt E c�c. ,cc.-- [1,Y; `yv 5 Wr DrL 73.01-QAJZ_______ deer Yb, IC q£*s _Slit) S'v.,N►wtet/c r a)- 1D/'• -1z4/1.11 ieAC'e k( (2.067D .(../ ',./...4.4^.er- Cce-Ser- 12 C ,,, I ( 014'1 is :cl y _ t'2662`7 ..,/ Cal.-.vim/ C,/," -- )v _ _---- �A°`eCkim?be,\k 12010 SW S umr Y CYes� -1)>-. 4400 01 9 th. KNSM-Nie A,2:•b 11SSSk-O -ffn kW i ' ' ei .-DDA-lF3 VDCS' a 1 Vi SS 5lA)Sit yny-yur-- ,j_ 0 , a *1&. ., L\\. j��i nes,) Sl�k,� 11 ��i 0 5�u st,1MV1��,v -O 6-1 ' / We,the residents of Summer Crest, Manzanita, 114th PI, and 116th Ave., petition the City of Tigard to fix our neighborhood streets. On August 7th, an Asphalt Rubber Chip Seal was applied to our streets, making them unsafe for children to ride bikes, scooters, etc... and limiting residents from walking their pets as previously done, due to a lack of sidewalks in the area. All Tigard residents pay a $6.56/month Street Maintenance Fee, however, we received a product that was 1/5 the cost of other neighborhoods and the end result displays this. In signing this petition, I demand that the city respond to this problem and provide clear communication with the residents as to next steps. Name Address Signature ZSlle Icor Maffei' /2/LS-CP sAi Sc mr17ar c4547,. 1.44-P-- J c..,)" I 1 /2 i 16i- l(,a 5,,,,i-..,. (e44 j)• ,0o , 21-----'' - l lsm—i \ 1 flo o ' -.k.\ _ __ 'AU4Ntx5c i icffic , %,Ns- W _ .e)-k- `kV , I ,g var9 .,IA. i orire,vlee h' w t t q a� z�wwt.w4.,Gr£L - r, LarLsaArfAr 11t1?OSw yativtani 5J-• 0.0.0..„.: >e-HA_ gtc-rerr- r/h 30 51,tot ah 1 q,,,---/ 5-(--. _�✓ 'gcan�N\ r2ca{,\, °I .o\b�� 5 ) SJMMQC CreSlt 1),C � � � � /_ ( a. (edit iOu Iaoa6 Sw Svr ev C,r t)v. uisarh��3avt,k ' _[ �' Sw `�Q�,kc✓ C e D. ! �'�i�i?4P' /� � 16-BA� 11830 �uno�nEi�(!ns} bin. c , ,,�i: 1 0% Ile ?/aw ciAPCirl (237A St, Surl,��. C,t-6� � Tia Pi 3-I-a-1 Atm I t t W Sk" Sww► CYPs1- DQ . 9/4- / ' / We,the residents of Summer Crest, Manzanita, 114th PI, and 116th Ave., petition the City of Tigard to fix our neighborhood streets. On August 7th, an Asphalt Rubber Chip Seal was applied to our streets, making them unsafe for children to ride bikes, scooters, etc... and limiting residents from walking their pets as previously done, due to a lack of sidewalks in the area. All Tigard residents pay a $6.56/month Street Maintenance Fee) however, we received a product that was 1/5 the cost of other neighborhoods and the end result displays this. In signing this petition, I demand that the city respond to this problem and provide clear communication with the residents as to next steps. Name Address Signature klichemil V mud Sw 5,,,,,,,e( CM'At D . ;%, ak Ggick 12(S114/ /f9`fo S (IJSaep, w,9Jcv5r j7if , V I, / Ate J �Ev�r okSSoS 119,10 Sw �rnrhev 6.14-A- �� `A"—(--' ocaMr,.. 161).‘ 6N- i 1 (r)O Sq)1/4.) 5Pr4r0•41 Cm4 t. k - \<4.0,- -.L S 40 SW StA M k - C�7 7 144 SPS l ►1 V•otwe-r S 1-2.-y II els gtr/ Svmmerie i- p2 r f //"4Aw. mut n.av� 1 is I a 411 u�I v v C wsf- y irNi° -,......._) ;--cw ab‘i.. 1►55 SW SA r,vnnevcJ.�r S� � ' � �. 1 SA 6, V a N\ 11(06 SW sowove rest 'Dr. 11> ' r 3 ..c.c. Lgoil---AcikA ( p-7.0 Lk() (,‘,.....,(z.-6e-A(Pr. ,/ `L .k&Me; 3, Nei 1 1 1 Z. S St,- S(4. ter' cre5*-- Pr, Tr' mf1 5. Aleji ' i -1 ..Stt—1 f/erkS Ss c.J .4,/►-)e__Q 4 ,os,./-P t .- --. 411;yr.-- 0.41041160 615tedwh lkaot 40 izAuvwvi GrvA v{• lvvvi e/L --- SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET FORM/1'7; tat? e4.11‘ryrhw, etti (DATE OF MEETING) Tigard City Council Meeting 8.22.17 Notebook: CMC Created: 8/21/2017 2:53 PM Undated: 8/22/2017 6:48 PM Author: Carmen Cordova My neighborhood and I have so many questions about the surfacing that was done on our street, Summer Crest Drive, on August 7th. I have yet to speak with anyone who is happy with the end result. It's messy, rough, unfinished in appearance, and worst of all, it's dangerous. People have changed their behavior because of the junk that was put on the street. Dog owners aren't walking their dogs because of the effect of the surface on their paws. A little guy who was just learning to ride his bike by himself for the first time,just before the project was finished, is now too scared to ride on his own street! We are all too often having to sweep the mess that our cars now track onto our driveways, and the tires on my car are full of chips from the nightmare street surface. I understand the asphalt rubber chip deal was a pilot project, although that was not made clear to us. I have never seen a pilot project handled so poorly. Those impacted by a pilot project should be communicated to more than anyone. We should have had been provided very clear detail on the what, why and how. I have questions that I emailed to you all, Mr. mayor and City Council members. I have yet to receive a response from anyone with the exception of Vance Walker, who acknowledged receipt and indicated that you, Mr. Mayor, would address my concerns. I must say I find that to be a bit confusing as my understanding is that Mr. walker manages street maintenance for the city. I would imagine he would be best equipped to respond in detail. Nonetheless I am not surprised by the lack of response, but I am disappointed. I will repeat my questions posed in the email for the purpose of this meeting. 1. What were the criteria used in determining the location of the pilot? I took some time out of my afternoon yesterday to drive around areas that received either the Slurry Seal or the Overlay, both of which are far superior to the pilot material. I couldn't help but notice that the home values in those areas were clearly higher than the value of the homes in the pilot locations. I find this to be interesting as the Street Maintenance Fee is a flat rate of$6.56/month and is not determined by property value. 2. What research was done to determine that this product was worth the investment of a pilot? I find it hard to believe that there would be community satisfaction with this product anywhere unless they had nothing else to compare it to. 3. If the Asphalt Rubber Chip Seal "will become smoother over time as the rocks on the surface get pushed down by vehicle tires and settle into the asphalt-rubber binder below," why wouldn't' a steam roller be used as part of the process to eliminate the problem from the beginning? Traffic on Summer Crest Dr. is not heavy enough nor consistent enough to resolve the issue alone. Additionally, the inconsistency of how car tires hit the road will not improve the surface in its entirety. 4. What is the contingency plan for a failed pilot?A solid "pilot" program always has a contingency plan in the event that the pilot does not meet the proof of concept. AIS-3235 3. A. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 08/22/2017 Length (in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: Consider Appointment of Schuyler Warren as the CDBG Policy Advisory Board staff Alternate for Tigard Prepared For: Joanne Bengtson, City Management Submitted By: Joanne Bengtson, City Management Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: Consent Agenda Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Should Council approve the appointment of city planner Schuyler Warren as the city's alternate to the Community Development Block Grant Policy Advisory Board Alternate? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends the appointment of Schuyler Warren as the city's alternate. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY City planner Lina Smith has been serving as an alternate to the CDBG Policy Advisory Board for Councilor Goodhouse, the current liaison the the PAB. Community Development would like to assign this role to new city planner Schuyler Warren to have Lina Smith work on other items. Policy Advisory Board By-Laws read: "Members and their alternates shall be appointed by the governing bodies of the jurisdictions which they represent and shall serve at the pleasure of said governing body. Notification of a new appointee shall be by letter from the appointing body to the Chairperson of the Board or his/her designee. An alternate member shall be allowed to sit as the representative of ajurisdiction provided that evidence of appointment of said alternate is provided to the Board and is satisfactory to the Board" A letter, as stated above, would need to be addressed to the PAB Chair but mailed/emailed to me at: Chair Frank Bubenik, PAB ATTN:Jennie Proctor, Program Manager Office of Community Development 328 West Main, MS#7 Hillsboro, OR 97123 Via email: iennie proctor(a�co.washington.or.us OTHER ALTERNATIVES Not approve the change in alternate staffing. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION The last time this was discussed with Council was when Associate Planner Smith was appointed as PAB alternate in July 2016. Attachments No file(s) attached. AIS-3237 3. B. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 08/22/2017 Length (in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: Proclaim Constitution Week for September 17-23, 2017 Prepared For: Joanne Bengtson, City Management Submitted By: Joanne Bengtson, City Management Item Type: Receive and File Meeting Type: Proclamation Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Should Mayor Cook proclaim September 17-23, 2017 as Constitution Week in Tigard? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST N/A KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY Dorothea White, a Tigard resident and member of the Daughters of the American Revolution (DAR) requested this proclamation to draw attention to the 230th anniversary of the American Constitution. The Constitution was signed on September 17, 1787, by delegates to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, presided over by George Washington. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Not issue the proclamation. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Mayor Cook issued this proclamation last year in September. Attachments Constitution Week Proclamation • s. 4 N, i. �- r Y ) c, cp. � • of ., e C1. /--z_, ,- 4 ' , —,. 4,mo(1rf 1 ( 1,!'t,:.- . City of Tigard .t.-- „..4. - . Constitution . Week .. r?: .r - :i WHEREAS, on September 17, 1787, the Constitution of the United States of F >�*: America was signed by 55 delegates to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia's Independence Hall; and vr:t• WHEREAS, September 17, 2017, marks the 230th anniversary of the drafting ,ii� of the Constitution; and : „`--IWHEREAS, it is fitting and proper to accord official recognition to a historic ;4` document that formed the basis of the America we know today; and 3” Oji ill' .14 '@ WHEREAS, on the anniversary of this important document, it is a great time to iii ': learn more about the historical events which led to the framing of the Constitution : in September 1787; and :I (R I: WHEREAS, Public Law 915 guarantees the issuing of a proclamation each I , a year by the President of the United State of America designating September IN, ': 17 through 23 as Constitution Week. -•":1 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT I, John L. Cook, Mayor of the City .. 1 of Tigard, Oregon, do hereby proclaim the week of September 17-23, 2017 as 4 - i CONSTITUTION WEEK in Tigard, Oregon and encourage all citizens to learn more about the sK document that united our citizens as never before and vested the power of ill the union in the people. 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal --'"4* of the City of Tigard to be affixed. 1:::' Ii, John L. Cook, Mayor :i u. '.s City of Tigard :l ` '41 Attest: It', 9 rs City Recorder 17 l f Y -,_:, :m-t,i x• s ... . ....a... a.. ... '-'.4 ' 1 L J m b { - '.�` ,ig" �i {fit" i S .s '1.'r., 5 - r AIS-3205 4. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 08/22/2017 Length (in minutes): 30 Minutes Agenda Title: SDC Project Update Prepared For: Kenny Asher, Community Development Submitted By: Susan Shanks, Community Development Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: Council Business Meeting - Main Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Discuss proposed changes to Tigard Municipal Code(TMC)Chapter 3.24 and System Development Charge(SDC)Program to clarify and improve program administration and support affordable housing projects. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST This briefing is for informational purposes only. Staff requests direction from Council regarding proposed policy changes and administrative improvements. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY In April and May of 2015, Council adopted amendments to TMC Chapter 3.24, Transportation and Park SDCs, and related SDC Methodology Reports through Ordinance 15-08 and 15-09. To assist with the implementation of these and other city SDCs, an SDC Administrative Procedures Guide was also adopted in 2015 through Resolution 15-15. In the course of administering the newly adopted SDCs and their implementing documents consistent with council policy direction, staff noted inconsistencies and procedural gaps among the various documents and in the city's administrative practices. To address these issues, management created an interdepartmental SDC workgroup in 2016 with representatives from Finance, Public Works, Community Development and the City Attorney's Office with the goal of refining and clarifying the existing adopted documents and related practices. The SDC workgroup recommended a discrete package of code amendments to address three time-sensitive development issues related to River Terrace development and citywide multifamily development. In June 2016, Council adopted these amendments through Ordinance 16-10. In August 2016, the SDC workgroup membership was revised to manage the ongoing work more efficiently and expertly. The current membership includes representatives from Community Development, the City Attorney's Office, and Tiberius Solutions LLC, a public finance consultant with expertise in SDCs, with oversight by management in Community Development, Finance, and Public Works. The SDC workgroup has conducted a comprehensive analysis of all relevant documents and policies and completed an Issues Identification Memo, Policy Recommendation Memo and Summary, and Policy Implications Analysis. The purpose of this briefing is to summarize this analysis and update Council on proposed next steps which are as follows: • Council Action: Amend TMC Chapter 3.24 • Staff Action: Update SDC Administrative Procedures Guide • Staff Action: Create Standalone SDC Project Lists The proposed actions by staff would be guided by the policy direction adopted by Council through amendments to TMC Chapter 3.24. Most of the proposed amendments to Chapter 3.24 are housekeeping in nature, but there are four that would result in policy changes: •Allow SDC credits for pedestrian and bicycle projects that further the city's goals for walkability and connectivity, regardless of whether the improvements meet the strict statutory definition of a "qualified public improvement." •Allow SDC credits for park projects that are consistent with the city's master plan standards and identified needs for parks, regardless of whether the improvements meet the strict statutory definition of a "qualified public improvement." •Allow deferral of payment until occupancy of Park SDCs by multifamily development for the same reason that Transportation SDCs are currently allowed to be deferred by multifamily development. •Allow exemption from payment of SDCs for regulated affordable housing developments. The proposed code language would define regulated affordable housing as housing that is made affordable through public subsidies and/or statutory regulations that restrict or limit resident income levels and/or rents. To be considered regulated affordable housing, units must: 1. Have a local, state, or federal compliance agreement or contract; 2. Be affordable to households at or below 60% Median Family Income as defined annually by Housing and Urban Development (HUD); and 3. Remain regulated affordable housing units for a minimum of 20 years from the date of occupancy. It should be noted that none of the proposed actions would result in a modification to any adopted SDC Methodology or SDC amount. It should also be noted that there is one significant SDC credit policy issue on which staff is actively working with Washington County that has not yet been resolved. It involves the interplay between the county's Transportation Development Tax (TDT) and the city's Transportation SDC (TSDC), specifically which projects are eligible for which credits and in what order. The way in which TDT and TSDC credits are calculated significantly impacts the amount of revenue received by the city (in the form of TDT or TSDC dollars) and the value of credits issued to development (since TDT credits are more transferable than TSDC credits). OTHER ALTERNATIVES NA COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS Tigard Municipal Code Chapter 3.24 Park System Master Plan Trail System Master Plan Transportation System Plan River Terrace Funding Strategy DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Council approved documents and code amendments related to the city's System Development Charge Program on: 06/17/2016 — Ordinance 16-10 05/19/2015 — Ordinance 15-09 04/28/2015 — Ordinance 15-08; Resolution 15-15 Attachments No file(s) attached. AIS-3195 5. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 08/22/2017 Length (in minutes): 5 Minutes Agenda Title: Informational Public Hearing: Consider Vacation of 74th Avenue Right of Way, VAC2017-00001 Prepared For: Kim McMillan, Public Works Submitted By: Carol Krager, Central Services Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Council Ordinance Business Public Hearing - Informational Meeting - Main Public Hearing: Yes Publication Date: Information ISSUE Shall the council, at a public hearing requested by Interstate Roofing, vacate an approximately 2,502 square foot portion of public right of way commonly known as SW 74th Avenue? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends adopting the ordinance vacating a portion (2,502 square feet) of SW 74th Avenue. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The petitioner, Interstate Roofing, requests approval of a right of way vacation for a portion (2502 square feet) of SW 74th Avenue. The proposed vacation is located along the frontage of Lot 16 of the Fanno Creek Acre Tracts, along SW 74th Avenue, Washington County Tax Lot ID Number 2S112AC01700. Twenty feet of right of way was previously dedicated in 1995 and currently only five feet of right of way is needed for dedication and frontage improvements to meet the city's current development code standard for this roadway. The purpose of the vacation is to align the public right of way along this property frontage with adjacent parcels to the north and south. Planning Commission reviewed the proposed vacation on July 17, 2017 and recommends the council adopt the ordinance. The Public Works Director's Report is attached and recommends council adopt the ordinance with conditions. The report describes: •Tigard Municipal Code requirements for review and approval of street vacation requests •A recommendation to approve the request with conditions. The report describes the following with regards to the request: Effect on traffic, pedestrian and bicycle circulation Effect on the provisions of fire and police service as related to increasing response time Effect on drainage Effect on provision of utilities Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Compliance with the Capital Improvement Program Recommended conditions of approval OTHER ALTERNATIVES The council could choose to take no action at this time. This would result in the property having an unduly wide right of way and limit future development options. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS None DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION At the July 25, 2017 city council meeting, Resolution No. 17-36 was passed, initiating the right of way vacation proceedings. Attachments Petitioner's Request Vicinity Maps Ordinance Exhibit A-Map and Legal Description PW Director's Report Planning Commission Recommendation % ,.. June 2, 2017 a 61 1991 City of Tigard MI 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Right-of-Way Vacation Petition 15895 SW 72ND AVE CIDA #: 130184.02 SUITE 200 PORTLAND,OR 97224 Dear City Staff PHONE:503.226.1285 FAX:503.226.1670 Please find the enclosed petition packet for vacation of right-of-way adjacent to the property at INFO@CIDAINC.COM 15065 SW 74th Ave. WWW.CIDAINC.COM The enclosed narrative details the extents of the vacation request along with the responses to city code sections. Following the narrative please find reference exhibits including title report, site sketch showing area of vacation, legal descriptions and a petition letter signed by the neighboring property owner who also has frontage to the area of vacation. Please let us know if you need additional information or copies. Sincere 40 y , t)(--(LcIAA-C___.____—_. ns Walker, RA Shelley Metzler Associate Architect Managing Member Enclosures: Cc: City of Tigard June 23, 2017 City Recorder I Community Development I Public Works 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard,OR 97223 To Whom It May Concern; To accompany the application for Vacation Request of approximately 2,500 square feet of existing SW 74th Ave. right-of-way adjacent to the full frontage of Lot 16 in the Fanno Creek Acres Tracts,please find the following description of application along with the notarized signatures of the surrounding property owners with frontage to the area of concern. This letter hereby notes that the listed owners have been notified of the vacation request and consent to the application to the City of Tigard. Request: A portion of existing SW 74th Ave. right-of-way that is fifteen feet in depth with be vacated and returned to Lot 16 (15065 SW 74th Ave—Mudroom LLC—Interstate Roofing). The area of land subject to this vacation request was previously acquired from Lot 16 via right-of-way by dedication. The previous acquisition required twenty feet of depth in 1995/96 application. Subsequent to this twenty foot dedication,the adjacent developments to north and south along SW 74th Ave. have required only a five foot dedication leaving a misalignment in right-of-way width and property line placements. This vacation will rectify the previous over acquisition and align the right-of-way in the area of the subject property. The acquisition will have no impacts to the physical features of the existing SW 74th Ave. or the placement of the elements currently being constructed as part of the site development applications on the subject property. As such the vacation requested has no impact on the physical property of the surrounding developments, private or public. I hereby consent to the vacation as describe above. Si ature Date t-L1 Rt;t- -cr-) I‘A ano,c(i n9 H-tinb-e-r-' (tHud Name/Title 15005 Sw —14 pcv-tin -Pbr-U c aP- 9� Property Address 2 os w 8 `f i Tvo,la6 in 012 q 70(02_ Mailing Address City of Tigard April 26, 2017 City Recorder I Community Development I Public Works 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 To Whom It May Concern; To accompany the application for Vacation Request of approximately 2,500 square feet of existing SW 74th Ave. right-of- way adjacent to the full frontage of Lot 16 in the Fanno Creek Acres Tracts, please find the following description of application along with the notarized signatures of the surrounding property owners with frontage to the area of concern. This letter hereby notes that the listed owners have been notified of the vacation request and consent to the application to the City of Tigard. Request: A portion of existing SW 74th Ave. right-of-way that is fifteen feet in depth with be vacated and returned to Lot 16 (15065 SW 74th Ave—Mudroom LLC—Interstate Roofing). The area of land subject to this vacation request was previously acquired from Lot 16 via right-of-way by dedication. The previous acquisition required twenty feet of depth in 1995/96 application. Subsequent to this twenty foot dedication, the adjacent developments to north and south along SW 74th Ave. have required only a five foot dedication leaving a misalignment in right-of-way width and property line placements. This vacation will rectify the previous over acquisition and align the right-of-way in the area of the subject property. The acquisition will have no impacts to the physical features of the existing SW 74th Ave.or the placement of the elements currently being constructed as part of the site development applications on the subject property. As such the vacation requested has no impact on the physical property of the surrounding developments, private or public. I hereby cons nt the va tiol as describe above. K, Signature Date f if}I i'''RAJ(-- >A f'L:17' Co , itf-t Name/Title Property Address 7 v ; Vv vvi ilt f'U s `?.i„,7,n-ta.ti. vii -I Mailing Address State of OREGON On this I) day of 1'Akk.1 , 200 personally County of L � L4.- ktw;` appeared before me S(-L-.J\S\tb�rkc>who / J N_ c.stated that (s)he is the .Q�`-31� ..A- of ';AC. i� a corporation, and that the instrument was signed in behalf of the said corporation by authority of its board of directors and acknowledged said .. , OFFICIAL STAMP instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Before me: ELISA R TURPEN "7-5.4--t- -,-. ckvz cR 7.4 O_ COMMISSION PUBLIC ON.900RE ON �:: MYCOMMISSION EXPIRES AUGUST 27,MIS Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: Ate 7 Jec — Z s,— — — � G :f s. ,". # a ,h, 1 ',0� 4- {{4 ' =Y , ir y'1 F.qq; 1 ,. . 11 is s - s -• „, a� i k F .r • 1 � S � � P 1 . �- *,t. A•e ♦rte la i �i �� , 4 i 1 �P s 1st A4 V 3• c�tus 1 e{, y F,1 r R *fir' l ei TT 7Y7��A J• i t s,p �q� _ ., `_ ��P. v;,- Mb ._sir a o. Aflti; '4'IC1'fl ?3S' '3 fir--ice ,r +l,' --.. '-� •-a( :} a`L' ! � -` 7.lJS. •V t , • i �1 1 x}111 , it I, !: q.Ca _ ':r l _� ( { 4d b_- ...�. ;y, rt. 41- 4 rt. ''''4 tk. tt-yk- k S. f 1 a. it r........0.4-.4;40r. 1,ikr l s z yl% j= R+•y _a'�""` T t F' _i 441,65)::,-,- K R s JAV CI Lw � , (k �Y. t r; �.... � _ r �`� „�.�.. � R tom✓ ,Ts` MMS 4,- -1111 1i!'.3JL �+ `~iti �. ; L 1 -_ J d� *�,._ I k ;- , 4 • "r 1_.,_., rf i 1, _ b ax k �i. ...0row_ _ .. Y. , ,g, . ' _ LCL, 4< ,Q :. 1**4* ^ ,,# �i bjj cj :!. _ _ L _ .l mow, c: ,- I I t J 1 yi1 �. lir. Y �• � t 1 4 tt ' ti t � • * fit i i• A94 l 1 I."d ' r'a f enr s + ^,_ �-a's`8 �W tip- �)) i',. tr per. L # ,,4 sd,` ,1''' .' .4 - ..---, t- -,8. .-!-. '-.. 4,...-,- - .. ,_,. , , i{, i 0 i� 1, �, _ . H.. , t-, .R s•_•'z p�s.A.,,,„:-.,...,. 111 Y . #. ! _. - 1.. F-i. •4 • -p„ \44-1I'''' 4s } , 4 ?* .i',4 ....ti. .,,, ,, , > 14865 7301 11R/1514865 ; 1R 14865 7301 14865 14065 14865 7301 14065 14865 7301 14830 7301 14865 14905 14915 7319 7319 7 319 14975 7319 7319 �1 7319 sat15065al II 7 7319 755 111 15205 x'735 et 1I 1 7725 7715 15245 1 7705 VI C4 N `1 4 7233 7233 7710 MAP 7233 ® Past 15271 7233 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 17- AN ORDINANCE CONCERNING THE VACATION OF AN APPROXIMATELY 2502 SQUARE FOOT PORTION OF PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY BETTER KNOWN AS SW 74ni AVENUE (VAC2017- 00001) ALONG THE FRONTAGE OF IN'lERSTA 1'E ROOFING,LOT 16 OF THE FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS IN THE CITY OF TIGARD. WHEREAS, the approximate 2502 square foot portion of the public right of way had previously been dedicated to the public;and WHEREAS, the applicant, Interstate Roofing, has requested that the City of Tigard vacate an approximate 2502 square foot portion of public right of way better known as SW 74th Avenue as described and shown in Exhibit A;and WHEREAS, the purpose for this vacation is to vacate an unimproved portion of SW 74th Avenue that is no longer needed for future public use;and WHEREAS, all affected service providers, including utility companies and emergency services, have reviewed this vacation proposal and either have no objections or have recommended specific conditions of approval which have been incorporated into this ordinance;and WHEREAS,notice has been mailed to all property owners abutting said vacation area and all property owners within the affected area,as described by ORS 271.080;and WHEREAS, in accordance with Tigard Municipal Code Section 15.08.120, notice of the public hearing was posted in the area to be vacated and published in the newspaper;and WHEREAS,the owners of the majority of the area affected have not objected in writing;and WHEREAS,the council having considered the request on August 22,2017, finds that it is in the public interest to approve the request to vacate that certain portion of the public street right of way for SW 74th Avenue because the public interest will not be prejudiced by this vacation as provided by ORS 271.120 and Tigard Municipal Code Section 15.08.130. NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The Tigard City Council hereby orders the vacation of that certain portion of public street right of way,as described on the attached Exhibit A (map and legal description of the area to be vacated) and by this reference made part hereof. SECTION 3: Said vacation shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the council, signature by the mayor,and posting by the city recorder. PASSED: By vote of all council members present after being read by number and title only, this day of ,2017. ORDINANCE No. 17- Page 1 Carol A. Lager,City Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this day of ,2017. John L. Cook,Mayor Approved as to form: City Attorney Date ORDINANCE No. 17- Page 2 ANDY PARIS & ASSOCIATES, INC. Registered Professional Land Surveyors 16057 S.W.Boones Ferry Road Lake Oswego,Oregon 97035 Ph: (503)-636-3341 Fax: (503)636-0477 DATE: May 1, 2017 Right-of-way Vacation FOR USE ON LEGAL INSTRUMENT EXHIBIT "A" A tract of land situated in the Southeast one-quarter of Section 12, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, being a portion of Lots 16, "FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS", Washington County Plat Records, being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the Northerly line of said Lot 16 that bears South 89°51'48" West, a distance of 60.03 feet from the Northeast corner of Said Lot 16; thence South 02°05'16" East, a distance of 166.80 feet to the Southerly line of Said lot 16; thence along said Southerly line, North 89°51'48" East, a distance of 15.01 feet; thence North 02°05'16" West, a distance of 166.80 feet to the Northerly line of said Lot 16; thence along said Northerly line, South 89°51'48"West, a distance of 15.01 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 2,502 Square Feet, more or less. REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR )(1/01- OREGON JANUARY 15,1987 HAROLD P. SALO 2264 MAP EXHIBIT B RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION BEING A PORTION OF IAT 18 "FANNO CREEK ACRE TRACTS" 2S 1 IN THE2AC SE 1/4 SECTION 12, T.2S., R1W., W.M. CITY OF TIGARD WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON I 4 TAX LOT 1600 LOT 17 - S 89'51'48" W 60.03' E2. LOT 16 15.01' NORTHEAST - POINT OF CORNER BEGINNING LOT 16U) 25' 20' W 0 WI RIGHT-OF-WAY i G VACATION , O P 2,502 S F. I lJ� F w N U Lo ID MAP 2S 1 2AC In TAX LOT 1700 0 0 I HN N 0 o U1 Z I 0 Uj UJ -J 15.00' - W Z 0 1 0 UJ N LOT 16 15.01' CC MAP 2S 1 2DB LOT 15 N 89'51'48' E O TAX LOT 500 IREGISTERED PROFESSIONAL. LA P SURVE OR 1 - , ANDY PARIS AND ASSOCIATES, A1C. O'EGON JANUARY 15, 1987 16057 BOONES FERRY ROAD HAROLD P. SALO LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON 97035 2264 PH: 503-636-3341 PROJECT 75075 EXPIRES: JUNE 30, 2018 DRAWING: 15075EX2.DWG City of Tigard • TIGARD Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Brian Rager,Public Works Director Re: Vacation of SW 74th Avenue (VAC 2017-00001) Public Works Director Report Date: August 22, 2017 The applicant, Interstate Roofing,has requested,in accordance with TMC 15.08,vacation of a 2,502 square-foot portion of SW 74th Avenue public right of way. A legal description and a map that depicts the area of the proposed vacation is included in Exhibit A. The applicant has a current land use approval, SDR2016-00001, for improvements on Lots 15 and 16 of the Fanno Creek Acre Tracts. The land use decision requires five (5) feet of right of way be dedicated along Lot 15. The applicant is requesting vacation of right of way adjacent to Lot 16 of the Fanno Creek Acre Tracts along SW 74th Avenue,where the existing right of way exceeds the current development code standard. The Tigard Municipal Code sets forth the process for review and approval of street vacations. Section 15.08.90 outlines the reports required by the Planning and Public Works Directors. At their July 17, 2017 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed this vacation request and is recommending that the council approve the request. The Public Works Director Report hereby recommends Council approve the requested street vacation,with conditions. The recommendation for approval is based on the following findings: • Effect on traffic,pedestrian and bicycle circulation - The right of way to be vacated is unimproved and not needed in order for the applicant to construct the required half-street improvements. The applicant has a current land use approval for site improvements, SDR2016-00001,which requires frontage improvements, including curb, sidewalk and street trees. • Effect on the provision of fire and police service as related to increasing response time—The public street, SW 74th Avenue, currently provides adequate access for police and fire service in this area and will not be impacted by the proposed vacation. • Effect on drainage—The vacation of the right of way will have no impact on drainage. The current land use, SDR2016-00001,requires the proposed development to handle on-site and off-site (street) runoff,including water quality treatment meeting Clean Water Services standards. • Effect on the provision of utilities—The utility providers were notified and provided the opportunity for comment. The applicant will be required to provide a 15-foot wide utility easement to cover any franchised utilities that may exist within the proposed right of way vacation area. • Compliance with the comprehensive plan, transportation element—The approved development, SDR2016-00001, provides a street improvement meeting the current standards. The pending street improvements will also result in proper alignment with curb and sidewalk north and south of the project frontage. The requested right of way vacation width of 15 feet is not needed to meet this standard. • Compliance with the capital improvements program—The proposed local street right of way is not identified for improvement in the capital program. The existing frontage improvements along SW 74th Avenue have been completed as a requirement of development. • Recommended conditions of approval,if any, shall be those conditions necessary to protect the public interest— o Condition: The applicant shall provide an easement for any public and/or franchise utility within the vacated right of way area. The easement shall be 15 feet wide. CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION Partial Draft Meeting Minutes July 17,2017 Meeting location: Tigard Civic Center Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. CALL TO ORDER President Fitzgerald called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: President Fitzgerald Vice President Feeney Commissioner Hu Commissioner Jackson Commissioner Lieuallen Commissioner Middaugh Alt. Commissioner Mooney Commissioner Schmidt Absent: Commissioner Fahr; Commissioner McDowell Staff Present: Tom McGuire,Assistant Community Development Director; Doreen Laughlin, Executive Assistant; Monica Bilodeau,Associate Planner; Khoi Le, Principal Engineer COMMUNICATIONS — 1) Commissioner Middaugh reported that he had applied for and had been selected to participate on the Levy Bond Advisory Task Force that will be advising City Council on how to fund services and facilities; 2) Commissioner Jackson reported that he had attended a neighborhood meeting for the rebuild of Tualatin Middle School and Templeton Elementary. He reported there were concerns from people who live on Murdock, but the overall feeling seemed to be positive; and 3) President Fitzgerald informed the commissioners that she is on the Tigard Tualatin School District Bond Oversight Committee, and if anything from the School District comes through the Commission, she will be recusing herself. CONSIDER MINUTES June 19, 2017 Meeting Minutes: President Fitzgerald asked if there were any additions, deletions, or corrections to the June 19 minutes; there being none, President Fitzgerald declared the minutes approved as submitted. July 17,2017 Page 1 of 3 RECOMMENDATION INTERSTATE ROOFING VACATION (VAC2017-00001) The Applicant requests approval of a fifteen-foot wide street vacation along the frontage of Lot 16 of the Fanno Creek Acre Tracts along SW 74th Avenue,Washington County Tax Lot ID Number 2S112AC01700. Twenty feet was previously dedicated in 1995 and currently only five feet is needed for dedication and frontage improvements to SW 74th Ave. The purpose of the vacation is to align the public right-of-way width of 74th with adjacent parcels. STAFF REPORT Associate Planner Monica Bilodeau went over a PowerPoint that showed an aerial of the area to be vacated (Exhibit F). She said the vacation was requested by the applicant to align the frontages and noted that, ultimately, the vacation would not affect the connectivity, the roads, or the infrastructure. She said, "A previous site development review was approved for Interstate Roofing for improvements to their sites - so they will be putting in sidewalks, planters - making improvements to the frontage. This request is to allow the bulk of the sites that they currently occupy to align up to each other and to have the same amount of right-of-way. Staff does not find any issue with any of our code by allowing this vacation to move forward; therefore, staff is recommending that you take a recommendation in favor of the proposed vacation to the City Council." QUESTIONS It's not the street that's being vacated; it's just that strip next to it, right? It's the right-of-way. What was there originally? Usually it's right-of-way for a reason. At one point in the 90's they did some development, and at that time we requested extensive right-of-way dedication by this property owner, so they dedicated it. Since then we've determined that this street does not need that wide right-of-way anymore. Now they've come in for a new development that was approved-and we established the correct widths for the right-of-way improvements;and that piece of it was not needed. MOTION Commissioner Feeney made the following motion: On vacation request -VAC2017-00001, I recommend that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the proposed 74th Avenue Vacation to City Council. Commissioner Schmidt seconded the motion. VOTE All in favor—none opposed RESULT July 17,2017 Page 2 of 3 Motion to recommend APPROVAL passes unanimously. OTHER BUSINESS —None. ADJOURNMENT President Fitzgerald adjourned the meeting at 10:00 p.m. Doreen Laughlin,Planning Commission Secretary A I LEST: Vice President Feeney July 17,2017 Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT F CITY OF TIGARD Respect and Care I Do the Right Thing I Get it Done 111 TIGARD Interstate Roofing SW 74th Ave Vacation Planning Commission Hearing Agenda Item #6 Community Development I July 17, 2017 ( : I -I ) O I ' "I' I CT A, R I) Itili 7319 7319 .,. • Area to be vacated 5065 'p F ___ • - ` ''' 44 *0 y_ - N , „. T T Y 0 F T T G A R I) Vacation Area r-' T r t j — l i r 1 I • \ VMS TM �^ 1 -- � I I ♦r• °C:«nom Al_ rz 3 v _ / �` ,� ,_ .,_ Area to be ......=OM/0•. I � a «� ;. �. . .. vacated ♦ n 0 �.e / // /f ! .,...r r -cr-- ., .0 -� -• 1 ii •- ----t,-- WA inkAt I-,- _,1 p®b .. - r i !_ti 7 ♦• \ \ � ., �- rte! e ... ' " —�/+� ,._ i ;: .y r` 1 . ` \ / `� `f-7.-.----r-r""1.- I 1r. 1 ti ` \ r W. tI11 1 : ! \ 4� (y I I a als.0 p t _ I 1 . l .. .._ __-. eat, m.. I _, CITY OF TIG ARD Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following action today: A recommendation in favor of the proposed vacation to the City Council. AGENDA ITEM No. 5 Date: August 22, 2017 TESTIMONY SIGN-UP SHEETS Please sign on the following page(s) if you wish to testify before CCDA on: Informational Public Hearing — CONSIDER VACATION OF 74TH AVENUE RIGHT OF WAY (VAC2O17-00001) This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony become part of the public record and is openly available to all members of the public. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. Due to Time Constraints City Council May Impose A Time Limit on Testimony AGENDA ITEM No. 5 Date: August 22, 2017 PLEASE PRINT This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony become part of the public record and is openly available to all members of the public. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record Proponent—(Speaking In Favor) Opponent—(Speaking Against) Neutral Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. (2, S,o Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. AIS-3239 6. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 08/22/2017 Length (in minutes): 5 Minutes Agenda Title: Local Contract Review Board: Consideration of Contract Award for Main Street at Fanno Creek Properties Demolition Prepared For: Joseph Barrett Submitted By: Joseph Barrett, Finance and Information Services Item Type: Meeting Type: Local Contract Review Board Public Hearing Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE Shall the Local Contract Review Board award a contract for the Main Street at Fanno Creek Properties Demolition project to Anderson Environmental Contracting, LLC? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends the Local Contract Review Board award the contract for the Main Street at Fanno Creek Properties Demolition project to Anderson Environmental Contracting, LLC in the amount of$352,043 and direct the City Manager to take the steps necessary to execute the contract. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The Main Street at Fanno Creek Properties Demolition project will include the cleanup of contaminated soil and the demolition of the existing buildings at the site. The property is located at 12533-12537 SW Main Street and is adjacent to Fanno Creek. The City Center Development Agency (CCDA) acquired the properties for their redevelopment potential with the protection of a Prospective Purchaser Agreement with the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. The CCDA has received two grants from the EPA totaling $400,000 to help fund the cleanup project. The cleanup and redevelopment of the Main Street at Fanno Creek properties will be a unique opportunity to achieve economic, social, and environmental goals in the heart of Downtown Tigard. A footprint for a potential development has received land use approval. The Agency is currently in negotiations with a potential developer to build a new signature mixed use building and a public space fronting Fanno Creek. The city issued an Invitation to Bid for the work in late June. Upon bid closing the city received only one bid: •Anderson Environmental Contracting, LLC $352,043 •Engineer's Estimate $278,250 Staff has reviewed the submittals and found Anderson Environmental Contracting, LLC (Anderson Environmental) to have submitted a responsible bid. Staff has verified that Anderson Environmental is eligible for public contracts with BOLI and has no State Construction Contractors Board disciplinary actions against them. Therefore, staff recommends the Main Street at Fanno Creek Properties Demolition project contract be awarded to Anderson Environmental in the amount of$352,043. OTHER ALTERNATIVES The Local Contract Review Board may chose to reject this bid and direct staff to resolicit the project. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS City Council Goal #3 - Make Downtown Tigard a Place Where People Want to Be. •Make Downtown Tigard a livable community with something to offer residents 18 hours a day, 7 days a week; develop housing units within Downtown. » Complete cleanup and redevelopment of the Main Street at Fanno Creek property into a mixed use building and public space. DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION This is the first time the Local Contract Review Board has discussed this potential contract. Fiscal Impact Cost: $352,043 Budgeted (yes or no): Yes Where budgeted?: CCDA Additional Fiscal Notes: The CCDA FY 18 budget has $400,000 budgeted for this work. A grant from the EPA for environmental cleanup comprises $300,000 of the total with the other $100,000 coming from CCDA funds. Attachments No file(s) attached. City of Tigard, Oregon iffi Affidavit of Posting III In the Matter of the Proposed Ordinance(s) T I G A R D STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, t.f.e.(( j at_i_ nil.> ,being first duly sworn,by oath, depose and say: I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of Ordinance Number(s) / 17- P-0 , which were adopted at the City Council meeting of Q�I.( 4.A.S-F ? i bon the as day of (�(,�� , 20 17 . (0f 1. Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, Oregon 2. Tigard Public Library, 13500 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, Oregon 3. Tigard Permit Center, 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, Oregon 4l_e_./14 iatAl1V-90 _I Signature di Person wlYo Performed Posting Subscribed and sworn before me this 025'(day of,"4-7/C7- , 20 /7 by 4e'/i7 01/7"h 7h e . �'f OFFICIAL STAMP * '.w4 CAROL ANN KRAGER � ��� .* NOTARY PUBLIC - OREGON NotaryPublic-State of Ore on 14, or COMMISSION NO. 924954 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES FEBRUARY 10,2018 1\ADM\CITY RECORDERS\FORMS\AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING-ORDINANCE.DOC