Washington County - Urban Planning Area Agreement (1980) WASHINGTON COUNTY - TiGARD
URBAN PLANNING AREA AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is en to red into this day of
by WASHINGTON COUNTY , a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, herein-
after referred to as the "COUNTY" and the CiTY OF TIGARD, an incorporated
municipality of the State of Oregon, hereinafter referred to as the "CITY".
WHEREAS , ORS 190.010 provides that units of local government may enter into
agreements for the performance of any or all functions and activities that a
party to the agreement its officers and agents , have authority to perform; and
WHEREAS , Statewide Planning Goal r2 (Land Use Planning) requires that opportunities
for review and comment by affected governmental units on plans and implementation
ordinances shall be provided ; and that city , county , state and federal
agency and special district plans and actions shall be consistent with the
comprehensive plans of cities and counties and regional plans adopted under
ORS 197.705 through 197. 795 ; and
`41HERFAS, Chapter 659 , Oregon Laws , 1977, empowers the Metropolitan Service
District , hereinafter Metro, to adopt land-use planning goals and objectives
for the district , review comprehensive plans adopted by cities and counties
within the district and require changes in any such plan to ensure that the
plan conforms to the goals and objectives , and coordinate the land-use planning
activities of that portion of the cities and counties within the district ; and
WHEREAS , the Oregon Land Conservation and Development Commission policy dealing
suith Urban Planning Area Agreements for the Metro Region requires each jurisdiction
requesting Acknowledgement of Compliance to submit a staternent setting forth
the means by which a plan for management of the unincorporated area within
the regional Urban Growth Boundary will be implernented; and
Page 4
(4) Proposed public improvement projects , including:
a. Construction of major Sewage Col lett ion/Treatment systems
(by the Unified Sewerage Agency) ;
b . Major Street Improvement , Dedication , or Vacation
(Publ is Works Department) ;
C. Governmental Structures and Buildings .
B . The CITY will provide the County with the opportunity to review and
comment on proposed land use actions within or by the CITY which will
clearly affect lands or facilities or services within the Urban
Planning Area, prior to CITY action. Such proposals include:
( 1) Comprehensive Plans , or plan amendments including any proposed
changes in land use designations or policies .
(2) New or amended planning implementation ordinances and/or
measures , including but not limited to zoning and subdivision
ordinances .
(3) Proposed land use actions within the CITY limits which would have
a significant impact on lands , services or facilities outside the
CITY limits , including the following:
a. Rezonings ;
b . Conditional Use Permits ;
C. Subdivis ions ;
d. Planned Unit Developments .
(4) Proposed public improvement projects within, the CITY limits ,
including:
a. Construct ion of or major changes to Water Distribution
and Sewace Col lett ion/Treatment systems ;
b. Street Construction , Improvement , Dedication or Vacation;
C. Park or Recreat jonal Faci 1 i ties ;
d. City Structures and Buildings .
� A
Page 6
4. Amen dments
This Agreement and the Urban Planning area may be amended only by the
mutual written concurrence of both parties .
The parties will jointly review this Agreement five years from the date
of execution to evaluate the effectiveness of the administration of the
processes set forth herein and to make any necessary amendments .
5. Special Policies
A. Annexations to the CITY within the Urban Planning Area will not be
opposed by the COUNTY .
B. Annexations to the CITY outside of the Urban Planning Area will not be
supported by the COUNTY or CITY .
C. The CITY and COUNTY will cooperate in planning for urban facilities .
D. The COUNTY will not approve a land use proposal in the Urban Planning
Area 1 f the C.1 TY presents evidence to show that the proposal would not
facilitate an urban level of development in the future upon annexation
to the C I TY .
E-.----The COUNTY will request that the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) prohibit
the connection of new developments (i .e . , built after adoption of this
agreement) within the Urban Planning Area to USA system facilities
without prior approval of the City of Tigard.
This Agreement commences on 19
tryl
o
CJ ��- -_ ✓ J t- 'I) !'��I� _ .! . fir: ... •:` /':' ` ,�'
1
.... � �•t t -Itr ( 1 _ Nq1
.:ajU�1___,ULJUU
rJ
if
' , -.-/ r' -J � '�\ '•`� \`,/�r.,�_ -.•:__^ '_-- - 'rel-< - «.. ��I-...... -. - - , } � _�. � _ ,.I�,w'.
oC p r r ------------ ' C� —
I�{e U 1: .;.r L 1- � � �� .. r,��` f1C-�.�.>;•. �`,���l�I __ -.� I� Fj ii il,1 ,� ... - ��I'
�t � i_� , `�- _� 1 =1 ,,L, ,,`�_� q�� �C,l _I .� .. I _ II' J``i__,, I _ _•,� ,' 1't- -
c��-=�•��� �� ..-• �'`.,, Ali i .�� ��/ �- �-� -� � I� ,(`n 1 t � � I
jjr /��� \- �l_�-� •:, i.==�..� •I_•. :i�{ tl� Ilj-f�jl:��1'1{�.��f...... !I �-- �
-11 f L,`
IX
1��2' }s ,1 •� (. I+ il;�\ \- jj
Icy-
---• r1a. / ir�� r�i`\ `ti- I j l l jl.f
Oil
to SSR _• \ L __
.��' 1 V,Ary' l
WASHINGTON COUNTY
Inter—Department Correspondence
Date August 26, 1980
c
APPROVED WASHINGTON COUNTY
To Board of Commissioners BOARD OF CObIIAISSIONIsRS
............
From Larry K. Frazier, AICP, APA, Planning Director L-(LT �`l ... .5'� �.•.••�5•. ................
<9a..e,...a0
.Johamen*s e:vxceraaeaaaeetec
Subject CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE URBAN PLANNING AREA AGREEMENT WITH
THE CITY OF TIGARD
Attached please find:
1 . Letter from Aldie Howard, Planning Director, City of Tigard, to Larry
Frazier of April 29, 1980 concerning a proposal to amend the joint city/
county Urban Planning Area Agreement.
2. Letter from Larry Frazier to Aldie Howard of April 21 , 1980 regarding
Ventura Court and proposed UPAA amendment.
The essence of this jointly proposed amendment is to provide for a more
rigorous notification process between the City of Tigard and the county.
The situation concerning the Ventura Court Subdivision, as discussed in the
April 21 , 1980 letter, is an example of a situation the City of Tigard feels
warrants a more rigorous notification process. As a result of the Ventura
Court Subdivision issue, the Planning staff proposed the subject amendment
to the City of Tigard. As indicated , the City of Tigard is in agreement with
the proposed amendment.
Staff recommends the Board approve the proposal thus amending the Urban
Planning Area Agreement between the county and the City of Tigard.
LKF:BC/mp
Attachments
CITY OF T1 R
WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON
April 29, 1980
Mr. Larry Frazier
WASHINGTON COUNTY
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
150 N. First Avenue
Hillsboro, Oregon 97123
REFERENCE: LETTER APRIL 21, 1980
Dear Larry:
The City Council has consented to your proposed changes in the
Urban Planning Area Agreement Part 3 C (1) page 5 as noted in
_ your letter of April 21, 1980:
1. The City or County, whichever has jurisdiction over the proposal,
hereinafter the originating agency, shall submit a copy of the
proposal to the other agency, at the earliest opportunity, but
no less than 14 days prior to the date the originating agency's
staff report must be in final form. Such notification shall be
by certified mail return receipt, in order to guarantee notification
has been properly given to the responding agency. The originating
agency will not proceed with a land use action without the receipt
demonstrating proof of notification according to the time
requirements of this section. If the proposed land use action
would create an inconsistency between the City Comprehensive Plan
and the County Comprehensive Plan, additional review time may
be requested to allow completion of a joint study as noted in
Part 3 above.
Please take the necessary steps to amend the current document.
Thank you.
Yours trul ,
Aldie ward
ning Director
AHvmc
12420 S.W. MAIN P.O. BOX 23397 TIGARD, OREGON 97223 PH: 639-4171
� roe
WASHINGTON COUNTY
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING — 150N. FIRST AVENUE
A HILLSBORO, OREGON 97123
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS April 21 , 1980 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MILLER N DUR1S, Charman LARRY K. FRAZIER,AICP,APA,Director
JIM FISHER, Vice Chairman (503) 648-8761
VIRGINIA DAGG
Mr. Aldie Howard
Planning Director
City of Tigard
P.O. Box 23397
Tigard, OR 97223
RE: VENTURA COURT and proposed UPPA Amendment
Dear Aldie:
The following letter is in response to your letter of April 1 , 1980
concerning VENTURA COURT and to the various discussions our staff has
had with you and the City Council concerning VENTURA COURT and the
notification clauses of the joint City/County Urban Planning Area Agree-
ment. `
The VENTURA COURT Subdivision has received the following land use action
approvals from Washington County:
78-371-2 . . Zone Change: RU-4 to RU-4 E Z
Approved with Conditions, July 6, 1978.
78-103-D . . Design Review: Approved with Conditions
September 27, 1980
79-296-S . . Preliminary Subdivision Plat:
Approved with Conditions
July 11 , 1979
79-2i4-FP. . Flood Plain Alteration Permit:
Approved with Conditions
March 17, 1980
The Final Subdivision Plat has been submitted to the Washington County
Planning Department for processing. The normal processing time for a
final subdivision plat is approximately 60 days. The final plat for VENTURA
COURT was submitted to the Planning Department approximately two weeks ago.
I have discussed this matter with Greg Hathaway, County Counsel , to determine
the options which may be available to the County in consideration of the
concerns of the City of Tigard. County Counsel indicates the County is
obligated to process the final subdivision plat. Likewise, the County has
no legal ability to convene a public hearing to re-examine the substantive
planning issues involved with the VENTURA COURT Subdivision. Approval of
the final plat for VENTURA COURT is contingent upon owner compliance with
WA "'AINGTON CO - NTY
Inter—Department Correspondence
Date March 4 , 1980
To Board of County Commissioners
From Larry K. Frazier, AICP, APA, Di rector
Subject Tigard/Washington County Urban Planning Area Agreement
Attached please find the Urban Planning Area AGreement jointly prepared by
and for the City of Tigard and Washington County .
This item was set over from your February 19, 1980 , meeting. On February 28,
1980, the planning staff met with representatives from the Department of
Land, Conservation and Development , Metro, the City of Tigard, and CPO 4 to
discuss several issues of relevance to the subject Urban Planning Area
Agreement . As a result of our discussion all parties concurred on a minor
boundary change to the initial Tigard Urban Planning Area. This change
includes approximately three parcels south of Pfaffle Street in the vicinity
of the intersection of Pfaffle Street and Hall Boulevard. Previous
recommendations excluded these parcels from the Tigard Urban Planning Area.
This change will necessitate taking the agreement before the Tigard City
Council for their consideration and adoption .
Staff recommends the Board authorize the Chairman to execute the Urban
Planning Area Agreement .
APPROVED WASHINGTON COUNTY
L KF• f r BOARD OF COQM'MISSIONERS
MINUTE ORDER # ...(J..+�.�••�• •
Attachment DATE ................... ?` ."- y��...................
..................................
CLERK OF THE BOARD
�v
February 15, 1980
tiller A. Duris
Washington County Commission
150 North First
11-illsboro, 01' 97123
P,e : Propa-sed Urban Planning Area Agreement between '"Tashington County
and City of TigarC`
Dear Commissioner Duris:
Pursuant to discussions hel"' with our LCDC field representative, Linda "life-Phearson,
I would request that the cormission not act on the Washington County Tigard
Urban Planning Area Agreement.
The Tigard City Council will hold a Study Session soon with our Planning
Department, the Tletro -"epresentative, LCDC people, and the County to resolve
certain very important boundary issues in the J..etzger area.
I feel, after consultation with oiir staff, that these issues can be resolved
expeditiously so as not to jeopardize our cooperation with the County.
yours truly,
Alan Mickelson
Mayor
A14;pj p