Loading...
12/02/1992 - Packet AGENDA NPO #7 MEETING WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 2, 1992 - 7:00 P.M. TIGARD CITY HALL 13125 SW HALL BLVD. TIGARD, OREGON City of Tigard JOINT MEETING WITH NPO 3 - DISCUSSION.- Board ISCUSSION.Board and Committee S&uc tum Update CPA 92-0007-City of Tigard-App0cant requests Comprehensive Plan Amendment approval to allow for a proposed amendment to Tigard's Comprehensive Transportation Plan Map which relates to the future alignment of a collector street connecting SW Walnut Street and SW Gaarde Street: ADJOURN TO REGULAR MEETING 1. Call to order 2. Roll Call: Woolery Blanchard Cunningham Dorsett Gross Howden McGlinchy 3. Approve Minutes from October 29, 1992 and November 4 meetings (attached). 4. Information from Chief Ron Goodpaster attached regarding Gaarde Street. 5. HOP 92-0184 - Safe and Sound Massage. 6. Review Notices of Decision Received 7. Other Business 8. Adjournment TO ENSURE A QUORUM FOR THE CONDUCT OF BUSINESS, PLEASE CONTACT LIZ NEWTON AT 639-4171, EXT_ 308 IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND. h:Jlogln Vo Jnpo7-A OGT -,Z0 - g2 P R 1 �34 ORPAC P . 01 Bill Gross 1103S SU 135th Tigard, OR 97223 Tel: 524-6325 October 29, 1.992 Liz Newton Tigard Community Development 13125 SU Hall Tigard, OR 97223 Tel: 639-4171 Fax: 684-7297 RE: SPECIAL NPO #7 MEETING; THURSDAY, OCTOBER 29, 1992-7=00 PM MEETING. CRLLEO TO ORDER RT 7:00 PM. ROLL CRLL Present= Uoolery, Blanchard, Cunningham, Dorsett, Gross, Howden, McGlinchy. REUIEU OF CPR 91-OOOSfZOA 91-0006: NEU COMMUNITY COMMERCIRL DISTRICT Members considered whether to endorse or oppose the recent revisions to the Plan and ordinance texts for this new district. Members reconsidered the merit of this new district. Motion: Ed Howden; to endorse, in general, this new district in order to allow possible nearby shopping opportunities for Tigard's neighbor- hoods. Second: Cal Uoolery; In Favor: 6; Against: 1 ; Rbstain= 0. Members considered the merit of the new scale criterion which requires that the zoning districts within one-half. mile of this district must average no less than eight dwelling units per acre: 1 . It is a criterion which might be practical for urban medium and high density neighborhoods, but not for Tigard's suburban low density neighborhoods; and NPO 7 MEETING-OCTOBER 29_ 1992 PAGE 1 OCT _ :5 0 - 9 2 PRI :54 O RPA C • P _ 0 2 2. It denies Tigard's low density suburban neighborhoods of poss- ible nearby shopping opportunities. Motion: Jin Blanchard; to oppose the new density criterion in order to allow more possible community commercial sites. Second: Kat Dorsett; In favor: 7; Against: 0; Abstain: 0. Katy � - Members considered the merit of the new locational criterion which ex- plicitly allows the City to limit the size of this district to less than eight acres to ensure consistency with other Plan policies and locational criteria. Motion: Bill Gross; to endorse the new site size limitation criterion in order. to ensure that possible community commercial sites would be compatible with nearby neighborhoods. Second: Ed Howden; In Favor: 6; Against: 1 ; Abstain: 0. Members considered the merit of the new locational criteria which allow conditions of approval for this district at any future site such as, BUT NOT LIMITED TOS access, setbacks, buffers, parking, coordinated de- sign and operating hours. Motion: Bill Gross; to endorse the new conditions of approval criteria in order to ensure neighborhood compatibility. Second: Katy Dorsett; In Favor: 7; Against:. 0; Abstain: 0. Members considered the merit of the new design guidelines and standards . for this new district. Motion: Lee Cunningham; to endorse the new design guidelines and stand- ards and propose that the new design guidelines become mandatory design standards in order to ensure neighborhood compatibility. Second: Ed Howden; In Favor: 6: Against: 0; Abstain: 1 . Motion: Larry McGlinchy; to propose that the planners consider possible environmental standards for this new district as well. Second: Katy Dorsett; In Favor: 6; Against: 0: Abstain: 1 . Members considered the merit of possible design guidelines or standards for existing districts. NPO 7 MEETING-OCTOBER 29, 1992 PAGE 2 OCT.--,30 - 92 FR I, �3S ORPAC • P . 03 Motion: Lam McGlinchy; to oppose any design guidelines and standards for existing districts. Second: Ed HIden; In Favor: 4; Rg ainst: 3; Rbstain: 0. t Chairman Uoolery will present our positions on the recent rev ions to t � the Plan and ordinance texts for this district atr the Planning Commiss- ion's public hearing on November 2, 192. MEEETIHG ROJOURHEO V-25 PM. Respectfully submitted, + Bill Gross, Secretary HPO 7 MEETING-OCTOBER 29. 1992 PAGE 3 NOV - S - 9 2 T H U If -4S O RPA C • R 0 1 Bill Gross 11035 SU 135•th Tigard. OR 97223 Tel: 524-6325 November 4, 7992 Liz Newton Tigard Community Development 13125 SU Hall Tigard, OR 97223 Tel: 639-41?1 fax: 684-?297 RC: NPO #? MEETING; UEONESOAY, HOUEMDER 1. 1992-7:30 PM MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:30 ,PM. ROLL CALL Present: Uoolery. Blanchard, Cunningham. Gross, Howden, Absent: Dorsett, McGlinchy. APPROUEO MINUTES FROM OCTOBER 7, 1992 MEETING AS READ. flPPROUED MINUTES FROM OCTOBER 29, 1992 MEETING AS READ. UELCOMC TO GUESTS No guests were present. POLICE CHIEF RON GOODPRSTURE AND CPR 92-0007: GARRDE ST EXTENSION Our NPO convened with NPO #3 to bear a presentation •from Police Chief Ron Goodpasture and consider a request for approval of the final align- ,Ment and design standards for the Murray Rd (Gaarde St) extension. Police Chief Ron Goodpasture discussed traffic control policies and practices in Tigard. Our NPO will convene with NPO #3 for a special meeting on November 18, 1992 -to consider the request for approval of -the final alignment and design standards for the Murray Rd <Gaarde St) extension. NPO 7 MEETING-HOUEMBER 4_ 1992 PAGE 1 NOV — 5 - 92 THU 1S 47 ORPAC • P . 02 CUP 92-0004: LORINC Members considered applicants request for approval of conditional use for residential care facilities in a single-family dwelling in the vi- cinity of 121st and Ualnut St. Motion: Jim Blanchard; to recommend approval of applicant's request without conditions. Second: Lee Cunningham; In Favor: S; Against: 0; Abstain: 0. REUIEU OF NOTICES OF DECISION No notices of decision were read. OTHER BUSINESS UPDATE ON REQUEST FOR A 4-UAY STOP STUDY AT 135TH AND MORNING HILL City Engineer Randy .Uooley submitted the final report, in a memo to our NPO, on the warrant study for a 4-way stop at 135th and Morning Hill. The warrant study failed to demonstrate a need for a 4-way stop at this intersection. Chairman Uoolery will discuss the study with Mr Uooley and update us at our next meeting on December 2, 1992. UPDATE ON CPA 91-OOOSlZOA 91-0006: NEU COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT The Planning Commission recommended approval of this new district with the recent Plan and ordinance text revisions, except the recent minimum residential density criterion, at the Commission's public hearing on November 2, 1992. The City Council will continue its public hearing on the district on November 24, 1992. STREET-GRADE CHANGE ON 121ST AT SCROLLS FERRY "embers discussed the new street-grade change on 1215t at Scholls Ferry resulting from the Scholls Hwy reconstruction project. Members find that the grade change is too abrupt and steep for a safe approach to the intersection from 121st. Chairman Uoolery will discuss this grade change with City Engineer Randy Uooley and update us at our next meet- ing on December 2, 1992. PROPOSAL TO OOUN-ZONE EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIUISIONS Members discussed a proposal to down-zone existing single-family sub- divisions in multi-family zones in order to preserve the character and compatibility of their existing single-family homes and uses. NPO 7 MEETING-HOUEMBER 1. 1992 PAGE 2 NOV - 5 - 92 T H U )640 O RPA C • P . 0 :9 Members discussed the merits of down-zoning several single-family sub- divisions in our NPO to single-family R-7. In general, R-7 zoning would= 1 ) Limit uses to single-family and other compatible uses and therefore prevent apartment. boarding, rooming or halfway house conversions and uses, or lodge or fraternity house conversions and uses; 2) 'Require a minimum lot size of 5.000 sq ft and •therefore discourage duplex conversions; 3) Limit building height to 3S ft and therefore limit the scale of any additions to that of existing single-family homes; and 4) Require a residential density transition buffer of 100 ft and there- fore limit •the densities of any new apartment-complexes adjacent -to subdivisions. Chairman Uoolery and Bill Gross net with Planners Dick Bewersdorff, Jerry Offer and Duane Roberts on October 6 to discuss down-zoning sev- eral subdivisions in our NPO to single-family R-7. Mssrs Bewersdorff and Offer raised several planning issues about the proposal at that meeting but deferred any comment on it. Planner Offer intended to re- search several down-zoning planning issues before our meeting in Nov- ember. Mssrs Bewersdorff and Offer now propose that planners 1 ) re-inventory •the vacant buildable residential land in Tigard's urban .planning area and 2) request city-wide approval to down-zone all existing single-fam- ily subdivisions in multi-family zones to preserve the character and compatibility of their existing single-family homes and uses. Chairman Uoolery will update us on this proposal at our next meeting on December 2, 1992. REUIEU OF THE PROPOSED TREE REMOURL ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS Members will consider the merits of the proposed tree removal ordinance amendments at our next meeting on December 2, 1992. The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on these proposed amendments at its meeting on December 7, 1992. MEEETING ADJOURNED AT 9=35 PM. Respectfully submitted, -Bill Gross, Secretary HPO 7 MEETING-HOUEMBER 4. 1992 PAGE 3 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO: CPA 92-0007 FILE TITLE: CITY OF TIGARD APPLICANT: Engineering Department OWNER: City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 REQUEST: A request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment approval to allow for a proposed amendment to Tigard•s Comprehensive Transportation Plan Map which relates to the future alignment of a collector street connecting S.W. Walnut Street and S.W. Gaarde Street. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals: 1, 8, 12. Comprehensive Plan Policies: 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 4.1.1, 8.1.1, 8.2.1, 11.3.1, 11.3.2. Community Development Code Chapters 18.22, 18.30, 18.164. LOCATION: City Of Tigard NPO NO: 3 & 7 NPO CHAIRPERSON: Herman Porter / Cal Woolery PHONE NUMBER: 639-0895 / 639-4297 CHECK ALL WHICH APPLY: STAFF DECISION COMMENTS DUE BACK TO STAFF ON 1992 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME:7:30 HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME:7:00 CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME:7:30 ATTACHMENTS VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN X NARRATIVE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN X SITE PLAN OTHER: STAFF CONTACT: Randy Wooley - 639-4171 NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST NPO # 3 & 7 CPA 92-0007: REQUEST: A request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment approval to allow for a proposed amendment to Tigard's Comprehensive Transportation Plan Map which relates to the future alignment of a collector street connecting S.W. Walnut Street and S.W. Gaarde Street. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals: 1, 8, 12. Comprehensive Plan Policies: 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 4.1.1, 8.1.1, 8.2.1, 11.3.1, 11.3.2. Community Development Code Chapters 18.22, 18.30, 18.164. LOCATION: City Of Tigard Please review the attached development proposal and comment on those items listed below which concern(s) this NPO regarding this application. This listing is a template to aid in your review of this proposal. Please let us know how you feel about this development taking place in your portion of the city. Thank You. Access To and From Site Traffic Impact Neighborhood Impact Environmental Impact COMMENT: NO COMMENT: [) Signed: Date: October 1992 Requested Revision to the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map GAARDE STREET EXTENSION Proposal Currently,the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map includes a study area referenced to Note 2. Note 2 indicates that two options are under consideration for a future connection between the Walnut/132nd intersection and the Gaarde/121 st intersection. It is proposed to select one of the two options under consideration and to amend the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map to reflect the option chosen. History In 1983, the City of Tigard and Washington County both adopted comprehensive plans that called for a future extension of Murray Boulevard to connect with the intersection of Walnut Street and 135th Avenue. Both plans also called for future connections between Walnut Street and Gaarde Street in the area west of 121 st Avenue. No specific alignments were indicated. In 1986,Washington County entered into urban planning area agreements with the cities of Beaverton and Tigard. The agreements indicated that the extension of Murray Boulevard would be designated as a collector street and provided a drawing showing the alignment between Old Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street. In addition, the agreements stated that an alignment would be developed for a collector street between the 135th Avenue/Walnut Street and the 121 st Avenue/Gaarde Street intersections. The agreements established design standards for the road. In 1989, the City began its Northeast Bull Mountain Transportation Study, intended to define the future collector street system for the area. Following several public meetings, including hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council, most of the recommendations of the Northeast Bull Mountain Transportation Study Report were adopted in April of 1990. However, the recommendations regarding the connection between 135th/Walnut and 121st/Gaarde intersection were not adopted; at the close of the hearings, two options remained under consideration. In addition, the Council had heard requests that the urban planning area agreements be amended to delete the Murray Boulevard connection between Old Scholls Ferry Road and Walnut Street due to GAARDE STREET EXTENSION - October 1992 Page 1 concerns about through traffic. Selection of the preferred option for the Walnut-Gaarde connection was deferred pending a decision on whether the urban planning area. i agreement would be modified. A In subsequent discussions with other jurisdictions, there was not support for amending the urban planning area agreements. However,there was support for an agreement on the timing of the proposed Murray Boulevard extension. As a result, an agreement was drafted that assures that the Murray Boulevard extension between Scholls Ferry Road and Old Scholls Ferry Road shall not be opened to through traffic prior to the completion of other road improvements on the west side of Bull Mountain as provided in the County's Transportation Plan. The agreement is intended to discourage the development of the Murray Boulevard extension as a route for through traffic. The agreement has been approved by Washington County and the cities of Beaverton and Tigard; the agreement was signed in January 1992. When Tigard's Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map was updated in 1991, a study area was added to indicate the two options still being considered for the collector street connection between Walnut Street and Gaarde Street. The study area is known as"Note 2". A copy of the map is included as Attachment#1. It is now proposed that the process be completed by adopting one of the options for a collector street connection between Walnut Street and Gaarde Street. Report Option The 1990 recommendation of the City staff was contained in Figure 12-1 of the Northeast Bull Mountain Transportation Study Report. (See Attachment #2.) Under this plan, Gaarde Street would be extended as a major collector street west and north from 121 st Avenue to connect to Walnut Street at a location 300 feet to 400 feet east of existing 132nd Avenue. In addition,the Report recommended that side street access to the major collector be restricted,that direct driveway access be prohibited,and that reduced design widths be considered between access points. This option will be referred to as the Report Option. NPO Option -The Neighborhood Planning Organization (NPO#3) recommended that Gaarde Street be extended west from 121 st as a minor collector, connecting to 132nd Avenue. The NPO recommended that the street be designed for a speed of 25 mph. Under this option, existing 132nd Avenue would provide the collector street connection between Gaarde and Walnut Streets. In 1991 a preliminary plat was submitted for a subdivision along the 132nd Avenue extension west of the Gaarde/121 st intersection. During the hearings on the proposed GAARDE STREET EXTENSION - October 1992 Page 2 subdivision, there was substantial discussion of whether the subdivision'should provide for the westward extension of Gaarde: as proposed by the NPO. After reviewing alternatives submitted by the applicant, the Planning Commission voted to approve a preliminary subdivision layout that did not directly provide for the Gaarde extension to 132nd. Commission members were persuaded that the site was not suitable for construction of an east-west collector street due to steep grades. Evidence was provided that a collector connection to 132nd Avenue could better be provided north of the site where grades are less steep. On appeal, the Planning Commission's decision was upheld by the City Council in Resolution 91-75. Consequently, the NPO Option represented in Attachment #3 shows Gaarde extended west and north from 121 st to intersect 132nd at a location near Benchview Terrace (north of the approved subdivision site ). Traffic Comparisons In conjunction with the Northeast Bull Mountain Transportation Study, future traffic volumes on the collector street system were forecast. The forecasts assumed full development of the area,based on maximum practical development under existing zoning and recognizing the development restrictions of steep slopes,drainageways and existing subdivisions. Based on these forecasts, Appendix E in the Northeast Bull Mountain Study Report contains material on future street capacities. Appendix E indicates that the collector street system designed to typical City of Tigard standards will provide acceptable levels of service under projected future traffic volumes, except at a few intersections. Additional traffic lanes may be needed in the future at some intersections. These intersections are along the Walnut/Murray connector from 135th to Scholls Ferry Road; along Gaarde Street near Highway 99W; and possibly at the intersection of 121 st and Walnut. The information in Appendix E assumed that the Report Option would be adopted. Selection of the NPO Option would not change the general conclusions stated above. However, selection of the NPO Option would change traffic projections on some streets, as discussed below. All discussion is based on work done in 1990 in conjunction with the Northeast Bull Mountain Transportation Study. Copies of the 1990 Study Report are available for review in the City Engineering Department. The NPO Option would reduce the future traffic on Gaarde Street. West of 121st Avenue,the build-out traffic under the NPO Option would be approximately 5,000 vehicles per day, compared to 10,000 vehicles per day under the Report Option. Under either option, the projected volumes exceed the guidelines for a minor collector street and fall within the volumes typical for a major collector. A two-lane street with a center tum lane at intersections would be adequate under either option. GAARDE STREET EXTENSION - October 1992 Page 3 -i On Gaarde Street near Highway 99W, the NPO Option reduces projected traffic volumes by approximately 200/6. The need for future additional tum lanes would be delayed but the long-term facility requirements would be generally the same as for the Report Option. On Walnut Street near 135th,the NPO Option reduces projected build-out traffic volumes from approximately 16,000 vehicles per day under the Report Option to approximately 10,000 vehicles per day under the NPO Option. Any need for additional future lanes at the 135th intersections would probably be eliminated under the NPO Option. Traffic removed from Gaarde Street under the NPO Option would divert to other routes. Impacts would be most noticeable south of Walnut Street on 132nd Avenue and 121st Avenue. Under the Report Option, 132nd would remain a local street between Walnut and Benchview. Under the NPO Option, 132nd would become a collector street with a projected traffic volume of 4,000 vehicles per day. On 121st between Walnut and Gaarde, the projected traffic under the NPO Option is roughly twice the projected traffic under the Report Option. When compared to the Report Option, the NPO Option is projected to increase future traffic volumes on 121st north of Walnut by approximately 17% and on Bull Mountain Road west of the 135th extension by approximately 29%. Smaller increases could be expected on other collector streets including the 135th extension south of Walnut, North Dakota Street, Bull Mountain Road east of the 135th extension,-and the future Sunrise Lane connection. These traffic comparisons are summarized in Attachment No. 4. Land-Use Impacts In general, both options are located through currently undeveloped property. The roadways would be constructed as new subdivisions are developed in the area. Roadway alignments and grades would be coordinated with the design of the new subdivisions. An exception in the Report Option is the area immediately south of Walnut Street. To complete the connection to Walnut, it is likely that the City would eventually need to acquire and remove two existing homes. An exception in the NPO Option is the area along existing 132nd Avenue south of Walnut Street. The existing street is narrow and has no sidewalks. Several of the existing homes have very steep driveways. Widening this portion of 132nd to collector standards or adding sidewalks would require major reconstruction of driveways. In some cases, it might be necessary to abandon vehicle accesses to existing garages. Major retaining walls would be necessary in some locations. , GAARDE STREET EXTENSION - October 1992 Page 4 Coordination with Other Plans State regulations require that comprehensive plans be coordinated with those of adjoining jurisdictions. The existing Regional Transportation Plan, the Washington County Transportation Plan, and the urban planning area agreements with the County and the City of Beaverton all call for a collector street connection between 135th/Walnut and 121 st/Gaarde intersection. To satisfy State regulations, Tigard must either adopt a plan consistent with these other existing plans or persuade the other jurisdictions to amend their plans. When the other plans were adopted, it was envisioned that the connection between Walnut and Gaarde would be a direct extension of Murray Boulevard. It could be argued that neither of the options currently under consideration precisely complies with this concept. However, the Report Option is more closely in compliance than the NPO Option. Operationally, the Report Option shows little difference from the previously planned concept. Its route is only slightly different from those considered when the comprehensive plans were adopted. During the Northeast Bull Mountain Transportation Study, this route was selected and the direct-connection routes were rejected in order to minimize impacts on existing development. From previous discussions with County staff, it appears that this option is sufficiently in conformance with existing plans to be considered in compliance. It appears that adoption of the Report Option would not require amendment of the other existing plans. The NPO Option deviates further from the direct-connection concept. As proposed by the NPO, this option would not comply with the design standards adopted in the urban planning area agreements. If this option is selected, it appears that Tigard would need to request corresponding amendments in the other plans and agreements prior to adopting the plan. Timing and Funding Whichever option is chosen, it is anticipated that the improvements will be made as development of the area occurs. Each subdivision would construct its piece of the roadway as part of the subdivision improvements. The countywide TIF (Traffic Impact Fee) ordinance provides for TIF credits to developers who construct portions of this roadway connection. The TIF credits would apply to all of the Report Option route; it is not clear which portions, if any, of the NPO Option route would qualify for the TIF credits. The area immediately adjacent to Walnut Street is already developed and is unlikely to experience substantial redevelopment within the next 20 years. In this area the collector street improvements would likely need to be completed by the City. Under the Report Option, TIF funds could be used be used to complete the collector street. It is not clear GAARDE STREET EXTENSION - October 1992 Page 5 if TIF funds could be used to upgrade existing 132nd Avenue to collector standards under the NPO Option. Preliminary cost estimates indicate that the NPO Option would be more expensive than the Report Option to construct. Because the NPO Option would traverse more steep terrain, it would require more earthwork than the Report Option. Widening of existing 132nd Avenue to collector standards would require extensive earthwork, construction of retaining walls, right of way acquisition, and reconstruction of existing driveways. It is estimated that the improvements requiring City funding would cost approximately $150,000 to $200,000 more under the NPO Option. Since construction is tied to private development of subdivisions, the schedule of actual construction is not known. If necessary, the City could eventually complete any missing sections of the roadway and recover the costs from developers as the remaining land is developed. Exact Alignments The Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map describes street alignments in general terms. Precise roadway alignments are usually determined at the time of actual development. The precise alignment is typically based on more detailed engineering and the needs of the specific developments that are proposed. Therefore, the proposed options describe only the approximate alignment of the future streets. When specific development proposals are considered, there is additional opportunity for public review and comment on the specific alignments. Under either option, the projected future traffic volumes are within the range associated with major collector streets in Tigard (1,500 to 10,000 vehicles per day). In either option, it is recommended that major collector standards should apply. The Report Option can more easily meet the collector standards as it follows a route with more gentle grades. The NPO Option would traverse a steep rugged area east of 132nd and would require steeper grades. Existing grades on 132nd Avenue exceed collector street standards. Discussion First review may suggest that the NPO Option is more desirable as it has lower projected future traffic volumes on the Gaarde extension. However, further review shows that under the NPO Option traffic will be diverted to other existing collector streets such as 121 st, 132nd, and Bull Mountain Road. These existing streets are already substantially developed as low density residential areas and are not well planned for high traffic volumes. We conclude that it is preferable to cant' more of the future traffic increase on the new roadway where new subdivisions can be appropriately designed to accommodate the greater traffic volume. This way,the increased traffic resulting from new development GAARDE STREET EXTENSION - October 1992 Page 6 will,to a greater extent,-be routed to the new streets created by new development; rather than to the existing streets. Therefore, we find that the Report Option is the preferable option for the routing of traffic. We also find that the Report Option is a better route in that it will have more gentle grades, .has fewer impacts to existing residential properties, and avoids the need to reconstruct existing 132nd Avenue south of Walnut. Finally, we find that the Report Option is in compliance with existing regional and local plans. We are not optimistic that the amendments to existing plans could be obtained to. bring the NPO Option into compliance. Recommendations It is recommended that the Note 2 study area on the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map be replaced by the Report Option alignment as depicted in Attachment #2. In addition, it is recommended that Note 2 be revised to read as follows: "Gaarde Street to be extended west and north from 121st Avenue to connect with Walnut Street at a point 300 feet to 400 feet east of SW 132nd Avenue. Direct driveway access shall be prohibited along the Gaarde Street extension and roadway connections shall be kept to a minimum. The width of the street may be reduced below the standards for major collector streets where tum lanes are not required." rw/note2 GAARDE STREET EXTENSION - October 1992 Page 7 W� ARTERIAL " rrasNo MAJOR COLLECTOR A --- MINOR COLLECTOR �e OCA LOCAL STREET p APPROXIMATE ALIGNMENT (Exact alignment to be o Ave determined at time of development. y. TRAFFIC SIGNAL (When Warranted) E t( o v 3 c1 o »- LL-1 SW-�115th Ave 99W a Sw- �rrr rrr REPORT OPTION -- 3. ALIGNMENT a o Bull Hountain Rd_ intersection w- 9 . . approximately a00'.-" Corridor location + west of 126th Ave. 300• - 4001 east f SW. 131st of 132nd Avenue w ,mow ;Y at Walnut St. 1 '� 3. iia??;t.vi:• •.•:��1 1 t S.W. 133rd Ave. S.W. 135th Ave. V oGd int ?, *41Q to LL. 141st Ave.- Sunrise LR S.W. 150th vim. o- =���¢ ........t ATTACEMMNT NO. 2 REPORT OPTION The Cit of See NOTES o n � �D TAn�� —� �_-� T I GARD back of page . Comprehensive g SEE NOTE � ;�� � — s-�—�� P l a n Sr .1 � A7 r a n s p ortation ± �� UWE DR _ TIGARD E 1 Figure 3 DDMRRS EE NOTE Li g ht Rai 1 4 . u �\ �� Corridor Study Area rM5 E T Study Area k ,} sr S E E u ; E N 0 T E f SEE N ' .�. A r t e r i a l E 3 �" --- Ma or . _ _ _ _ �_-�_�r_ Q `� '�.- ' Co 1 e tar UVERBLMr { 7�usJ Cr Pooic 1 ❑ o r t NOTE 9 Collector aA ST Freea loo, { SEE NOTE x � yy g 1' I ❑ terchan e Digital Iota & nap represen- t ation compiled by the City 86TH at Tigard utilizing Ceogra- piic Information System CIS? software. Infor- mation portrayed sere may be intended to be Ordinance No ORD 91- 13 used with edditioaal S E E N 0 R T R technical and/or ( iat2rpretatire data Map adopted juNE it , 1991 NOTE es determined b tie City of Tigard. See back for revision schedule �`� $ (upTsasj • 0 3600 (03/19191 ) .f. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION MAP NOTES COMPR911EUSIVE PLAN T 1. Scholls Ferry Road to be realigned to connect with Davies Road. TRANSPORTATION MAP I j 2. Study area to determine a future connection between the Walnut/132nd REVISION scIIEnuLE intersection and the Gaarde/121st intersection. A major collector extension of ORDINANCE HATE Gaarde Street has been recommended by the Northeast Bull Mountain Transportation Study Report. An indirect connection of minor collectors has . been recommended by NPO #3. ' 91-22 August 13, 1991 92-0007 March 24, 1992 3. Approximate alignments are shown for the extensions of 132nd Avenue south; of Benchview Terrace, 135th Avenue south of Walnut Street, and Benchview. Terrace west of 132nd Avenue. These streets are to be designed as minor collectors with a design speed of 25 m.p.h.. 4. Study area to determine:the configuration of a new connection between southbound Pacific highway and Main Street. 5. Study_area to determine the alignment of a minor collector street connecting 68th Parkway near Red Rods Creek with the Dartmouth Street extension; and with Hampton Street at-72nd Avenue with the Dartmouth Street extension within the westerly portion of the Tigard Triangle_ . 6. Study area to determine the alignment of connections between Highway 217, 4 Kruse Way, 1-5 and the Tigard Triangle. 7. Connections between Hunziker.Street,,Hall Boulevard at O'Mara Street _.. (generally) and Bonita Road. " 8. Study area to consider extension of Hall Boulevard southward to connect witti YIA Boones Ferry Road in Tualatin for either pedestrian or vehicular access_ I 9. A local street connection.from 100th Avenue to 109th Avenue intersecting 109th Avenue either at Sattler Street or at a point at least 100 feet from the existing Sattler Street intersection. 1 10. An extension and realignment of 109th Avenue south of the Sattler Street extension, to intersect Pacific Highway at Royalty Parkway. The realigned r 109th Avenue shall intersect Naeve Street at a point approximately 250 feet to 450 feet east of Pacific Highway. � ; mptms.per , .i • GAARDE/110th - 35 MPH ZONE . MAY/NOVEMBER COMPARISON Volume *5/05 Tue 2500 4729 Tue 11/10* 5/06 Wed 8705 9073 Wed 11/11 5/07 Thu 9089 8849 Thu 11/12 *5/08 Fri 401 4228 Fri 11/13* May ave. volume - 8897 vehicles Nov ave. volume - 8961 vehicles *Partial day statistics Speeds mph 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-45 May 154 384 532 1432 4506 8079 3547 Nov 238 622 833 1900 6767 11030 4135 mph 46-50 51-55 56-60 61-66 67-70 71-75 May 770 324 53 31 13 6 Nov 767 309 56 43 8 9 May - average speed 38.75 mph Nov - average speed 38.13 mph 11/16/92 Number Dist Cla DIV Date Street Cross street Factor 89-1714 NI M 04_25_89 WALNUT 99W FAIL TO YE 89-3075 I M 07_31_89 SW WALNUT S 99W FAILURE TO 89-3875 NI M 09_21_89 WALNUT 99W - EQUIPMENT 89-4355 _ NI M 10_25_89 WALNUT 99W HIT AND RU 89-4355 NI M 10_25_89 WALNUT 99W HIT AND RU 90-0177 I P 01_13_90 WALNUT FONNER FAILURE TO 90003654 4 IN T 08/30/90 WALNUT GRANT MEDICAL 91001729 _ NI P 04/20/91 WALNUT 10200 BLOCK DUII 92001704 IN P 03/25/92 WALNUT FOWLER JR HI CARELESS D 92002875 _ IN T 05/28/92 WALNUT ST 124TH PED DARTED 92003381 _ NI T 06/25/92 WALNUT 132ND HIT AND RU • LOG _ NI P 01/12/92 WALNUT PACIFIC HIGH UNKNOWN LOG _ NI M 03_09_89 WALNUT 99W. UNKNOWN LOG NI P 10/02/92 WALNUT FONNER UNKNOWN LOG NI T 10/08/92 WALNUT 123RD-124TH RECKLESS LOG _ NI M 04_12_90 WALNUT 99W F.T.Y. R/W LOG 4 NI P 08/28/90 WALNUT TIEDEMAN UNKNOWN LOG NI P 12/27/90 WALNUT.' 121 UNKNOWN LAG -NI P. 01/05/91 WALNUT 99W UNKNOWN LOG NI P 03/28/92 WALNUT 9900 BLACK HIT AND RU LOG NI P 01/20/91 WALNUT WATKINS FIRECOMM LOG _ NI P 04/03/92 WALNUT GRANT UNKNOWN LAG _ NI P 12_11_89 WALNUT TIEDEMAN CARELESS LOG NI T 12/09/91 WALNUT PACIFIC HWY UNKNOWN LOG _ NI T 05/07/92 WALNUT PL 9800 BLOCK HIT & RUN LOG _ NI P 12/23/91 WALNUT 99W UNKNOWN LOG NI T 05/26/92 WALNUT 99W UNKNOWN eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee • dl2 '� j a All Aee-,ola& ,73 US d N eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee Search complete Records matched: 27 8:20:26a USER NAME : BANNER : LST: !6 631 Number Dist Cla DIV Date Street Cross street Factor 90-2243 _ I M 05_30_90 GAARDE 100 BLOCK RECKLESS D 90-2532 I M 06_19_90 GAARDE 112TH FOLLOW TOO 91003956 IN P 09/07/91 GAARDE 112TH PASSING VI LOG NI P 09/23/91 GAARDE 99W HIT AND RU LOG _ NI P 10/05/91 GAARDE 11800 BLOCK HIT AND RU LOG Ni P 07/11/92 GAARDE 99W UNKNOWN-FI LOG 3 NI T 09/07/90 GAARDE 11200 BLOCK UNKNOWN LOG NI P 01/27/91 SW GAARDE 99W UNKNOWN . LOG _ NI M 06_20_89 GAARDE 11000 BLOCK FOLLOW TO LOG NI T 12/20/91 GAARDE 99W - UNKNOWN eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee All AGG /Q�1T'S 12�oRv 73 eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee Search complete Records ;Hatched: 10 8:25:17a TYPE II HONE OCCUPATION NOTICE OF DECISION CITY OF TIGARD OREGON This is to notify property owners within 250 feet, that the below named person(s) have been approved for a Home Occupation Permit. Business Name: Safe & Sound Massacre File No.: HOP 92-0184 Name of Applicant: Lloyd E Sell Property Address: 11409 Sw Ironwood Lip - Tax Map: 1S1 34AC Lot No.: 1300 � � U Zone: R-4.5 EFFECTIVE DATE: 1�`'C,C1M6 ! . 1912- Nature of Business: Massage Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director's Designee for the City of Tigard has APPROVED this Home Occupation. No business activity shall begin until after the appeal period has expired. This Home Occupation is subject to the following conditions: 1) Home occupations may be undertaken only by the principal occupant (s) of a residential property; 2) There shall be no more than three deliveries per week to the residence by . suppliers; - 3) There shall be no offensive noise, vibration, smoke, dust, odors, heat or glare noticeable at or beyond the property line resulting from the operation. Home occupations shall observe the provisions of TDC Chapter 18.090 (Environmental Performance Standards);. 4) The home occupation shall be operated entirely within the dwelling unit and a conforming accessory structure. The total area which may be used in the accessory building for either material product storage and/or the business activity shall not exceed 528 square feet. Otherwise, the home occupation and associated storage of materials and products shall not occupy more than 25 percent of the combined residence and accessory structure gross floor area. The indoor storage of materials or products shall not exceed the limitations imposed by the provisions of the building,fire,health and housing codes; 5) A home occupation shall not make necessary a change in the Uniform Building Code use classification of a dwelling units. Any accessory building that is used must meet Uniform Building Code requirements and be in conformance with TDC Chapter 18.144 of this title; 6) More than one business activity constituting two or more home occupations shall be allowed on one property only if the combined floor space of the business activities does not exceed 25 percent of the combined gross floor area of the residence and accessory structure. Each home occupation shall apply for a separate home occupation permit. 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,P.O.Box 23397,Tigard Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 ISC 7) There shall be no storage and/or distribution of toxic or flammable materials, and spray painting or spray finishing operations that involve toxic or flammable material which in the judgement of the Fire Marshall pose a dangerous risk to the residence, its occupants, and/or surrounding properties. Those individuals which are engaged in home occupations shall make available to the fire marshall for review the Material Safety Data Sheets which pertain to all potentially toxic and/or flammable materials associated with the use; 8) No home occupation shall require any on or off-street parking other than that normally required for a residence; 9) The following uses are not allowed as home occupations: a) Auto-body repair and painting b) Ongoing mechanical repair conducted outside of an entirely enclosed building C) Junk and salvage operations d) Storage and/or sale of fireworks 10) There shall be no-exterior storage of vehicles of any kind used for the business except one commercially licensed vehicle of not more than three- quarters ton GVW which may parked outside of a structure or screened area. Type II home occupations allow the following according to TDC Chapter 18.142.050: a) One non-illuminated sign, not exceeding 1.5 square feet, which shall be attached to the residence or accessory structure or placed in a window; b) ' No more than one outside . volunteer or employee who is not a principal resident of the premises; C) No more than six daily customers or clients. Customers and clients may not visit the business between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. and shall not generate excessive traffic or monoploize on- street parking; d) Storage of materials, goods, and equipment .which is screened entirely from view by a solid fence. Storage shall not exceed five percent of the total lot area and shall not occur within the front yard or the required side yard setback; if any of the preceding conditions are not met, this Some Occupation Permit will be immediately invalidated. Notice was posted at City Sall and mailed to: XX The applicant and owners. XX Owners of record within the required distance xx The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization XX Affected governmental agencies THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON �Z- q- qZ • UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given and sent. C C The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 PH 12"- q— q2— If /ZIf you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., PO Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223, 639- 4171. j Y PREPARED BY: Victor Adonri, Assistant Planner DATE Z Richard Bewersdorff, r Planner DATE APPROVED bkm/HOP92184 City of Tigard, Oregon A.40 FOR STAFF USE ONLY HOME OCCUPATION APPLICATION CASE NO. Ate 99 CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 OTHER CASE NO'S: Tigard. Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 RECEIPT NO. ?A—;,33SoZ 7 APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: DATE: //- D S — 7-2- 1. 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements submitted: PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION__/�ff!� S4/ ,Zy�,wooq�.�`J ✓ (A)Application form (1) ;r/g4z)n4 " g 7'r_VzA "',(B) Owners signature/written TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. /S/ 3 —/c3 t7O authorization / v-' (C) Title transfer instrument (1) SITE SIZE �rrPAy�Y . � �er /y-yx*J- "At) e/ (D) Plot plan (1 copy) PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER* /sycY /�, Sc// �(E) Applicant's statement(1 copy) ADDRESS 1/1¢49 SJY PHONE 4.00-321 d (F) Filing Fee$10-Type I CITY_ g� ar �Q ' ZIP 9 7 2Z3 Filing Fee $50-Type If APPLICANT` ADDRESS SAVT, PHONE 4 Zo -2279i*, {/ CITY ZIP � ?t3 DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: BUSINESS NAME -Sajrr_ 'When the owner and the applicant are d'dferent people.-the applicant must be the purchaser-of record or a lessee in FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: possession with written authorization 6Vhe o_*ger�or� agent of the owner with written authodzation. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space,". 61 page two _ COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION. or submit a written authorization"Wit i 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY ?, The owners of record of the subject property _ N.P_O. Number request approval of a homeo paean to alllo=w (be specific) c Planning Director Approval Date: Business Tax: 3. Specify whether you are using a detached building on your property and give dimensions: �� 0 { ( t� 3. List any variance or other land use actions to be considered as part of this application: 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described below: A. One application form with signature or written authorization B. • One copy of the title transfer instrument (eg. deed) C. One copy each of the attached question sheet and floor plan D. Filing fee: Type I - $10 Type II -$50 5.. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise-the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and.limitatiorts of the approval_ C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge . that any permit issued, based on this application',may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false D. The applicant has read the entire contents oUbe application, including.the policies and criteria, and understands the regbirements for app,roving%or:deny1ng,'-•t.. the application. sr. 92 ` DATED this 9 ' . day of -/�rwe�XeY., SIGNATURES of each owner leg. husband and w e) of the subject property. � e Revised 11/21/91 TO APPLY FOR A HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT, PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: 1. Will you have any paid employees working in the home in conjunction with the business who are not residents of the home? AIV 2. Will you have customerstdients coming to your residence? If so, how many per day? 3. Will you have deliveries or pickups made of products or supplies to your residence? If so, how many and what type? NO 4. What will your hours and days of operation be? f �m e 8:o0 Al-4 1-o l0:©m P/vl 5. Will the business generate any noise which can be heard outside of the structure? Alb 6. How many square feet is your residence and how many square feet will be devoted to the operation of your business, including storage areas? S? 79 �irain�Ss 7. What vehicles will.be associated with the business that are garaged at the residence? /Vo ,t�V�sig.•e Ss � i �/es 8. Do you intend to store any materials, vehicles-or products outdoors at the premises in conjunction with the business? /fid 9. Will you have-any signs or advertising visible from the exterior of the premises? // 10. Please show the floor layout of your,house and the area to be used for your home occupation on the attached graph paper. Please Aesignate those areas which shall be utilized .1) entirely for the home occupation and 2) partially for the home occupation. Please designate the approximate dimensions of the rooms(s) to be used for the home occupation. nA%wd1c mdevUwpermit i- F/ O O '�.,•,�. it�k.: '. `- �Irl 7 69 g ' 78 t IAIL RI L G � � +Y• � 9.4 • Sew ���� �.�;- st�y 37 i, �l . ham J ..r.. ...rte'�-are.•..�5>3�t'YnL�t?*:g�,�:�fht!�''�'s'+�i; � ,� !'4i'tkE^�!'��` �k�':�k'''�'`' �S? +�d: .. ... M�{�,