Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
VAR2014-00007
Iiii ' City of Tigard • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ^ I ii • Request Permit Action t, , .:.* I c,,,r I) 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.718.2439 • www.tigard-or.gov TO: CITY OF TIGARD Building Division Services Supervisor 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 Phone: 503.7182430 Fax 503.598.1960 www.tigard-or.gov FROM: ❑ Owner ® Applicant ❑ Contractor ❑ City Staff (check one) REFUND OR Name: Pacific Telecom Services INVOICE TO: (Business orIndividual) Mailing Address: 1001 SE Water Ave.,Ste 180 City/State/Zip: Portland,OR 97214 Phone No.: 503.708.9200 PLEASE TAKE ACTION FOR THE ITEM(S) CHECKED (1): ® CANCEL/VOID PERMIT APPLICATION. ® REFUND PERMIT FEES (attach copy of original receipt and provide explanation below). El INVOICE FOR FEES DUE (attach case fee schedule and provide explanation below). ❑ REMOVE/REPLACE CONTRACTOR ON PERMIT(do not cancel permit). Permit#: CUP2014-00001, Site Address or Parcel#: 13835 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 Project Name: PD32 Hall and McDonald,AT&T Cell Site Subdivision Name: 2S102DD00901 Tax Lot Lot#: EXPLANATION: Couldn't come to reasonable lease terms with the underlying land owner Dili 7e ,66- u./.t..L, ea % /x6-72. .77#4 /�zo7.6 • V.°1-Signature: 1'. / Date: 8.5.14 Al-Print Name: ¶1 Ps .' S/,G , 0-v Pry 70 = /1/4'f,P0 qO ?Zzc 76 S.av e (Pe To - !o/.?.cn, /S3 cO Refund Policy y 760,Al /,"ia•Re 1. The Community Development Director or Building Official may authorize the refund of: a) any fee which was erroneously paid or collected. Ne /2.E7 tAvei5 b) not more than 80%of the land use application fee when an application is withdrawn or canceled before any review effort has been expended. c) nor more than 80%of the land use application fee for issued permits d) not more than 80%of the building plan review fee when an application is canceled before any plan review effort has been expended e) not more than 80%of the building permit fee for issued permits prior to any inspection requests. 2. All refunds will be returned to the original payer in the form of a check Please allow 3-4 weeks for processing refund requests. I O12 OI 1 1( 1. 1 tiI O' I.1 Rte to S Admin: Date B Rte to =•r•. Admin: Date 6P®�,PQr• Refund Processed: Date , ®�' : ,Crm Invoice Processed: Date B Permit Canceled: Date AMON B .407.11 Parcel T.: Added: Date B Receipt# Date. Method Amount S I:\Building\Forms\RegPermitA crion_062614.doc TIGARD City of Tigard August 21, 2014 Pacific Telecom Services Attn: Zach Phillips 1001 SE Water Ave., Ste 180 Portland, OR 97214 Re: Permit No.VAR2014-00007, CUP2014-00001 Dear Applicant: The City of Tigard has canceled the above referenced permit(s) and encloses a refund for the following: Site Address: 13835 SW Hall Blvd Project Name: PD32 - AT&T Cell Site Job No.: Refund Method: ❑ Check#214721 in the amount of$5,319.20. ❑ Credit card "return" receipt in the amount of$ Note: Please allow 2-5 days for this refund transaction to be credited to your account by the company that issued your card. ❑ Trust account"deposit" receipt in the amount of$ Comment(s): Per applicant's request to cancel permit as could not agree on lease terms with property owner. Refund 80% of application fees. If you have any questions please contact me at 503.718.2430. Sincerely, Dianna Howse Building Division Services Supervisor Enc. 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov If City of Tigard TIGARD Accela Refund Request This form is used for refund requests of land use, development engineering and building permit application fees. Receipts, documentation and the Request for Permit_Action form (if applicable) must be attached to this request form. Refund requests are due to Accela System Administrator by each Wednesday at 5:00 PM. Please allow up to 3 weeks for processing of refunds. Accounts Payable will route refund checks to Accela System Administrator for distribution to applicant. PAYABLE TO: Pacific Telecom Services DATE: 8/14/2014 Attn: Zach Phillips 1001 SE Water Ave., Ste 180 REQUESTED BY: Dianna Howse Portland, OR 97214 JF TRANSACTION INFORMATION: Receipt#: 195570 Case#: CUP2014-00001 Date: 4/14/2014 Address/Parcel: 13835 SW Hall Blvd. Pay Method: Check Project Name: PD32-AT&T Cell Site EXPLANATION: Per applicant's request to cancel permit as could not agree on lease terms with property owner. Refund 80%o of application fees per John Floyd. REFUND INFORMATION: Fee Description From Receipt Revenue Account No. Refund Example: Building Permit Fee Example: 2300000-43104 $Amount Conditional Use Permit 100-0000-43116 $4,148.80 Conditional Use Permit-LRP 100-0000-43117 612.00 TOTAL REFUND: $4,760.80 APPROVALS: SIGNATURES/DATE: If under$5,000 Professional Staff If under$12,500 Division Manager If under$25,500 Department Manager If under$50,000 City Manager If over$50,000 Local Contract Review Board FOR TIDEMARK SYSTEM ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY � Case Refund Processed: Date: 1/2/j j By: . ` 1:\Building\Refunds\RefundRequest.doc x 09/01/2010 City of Tigard • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT :1 _ Request Permit Action l ;c;n 14 D 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.718.2439 • www.tigard-or.gov TO: CITY OF TIGARD Building Division Services Supervisor 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 Phone: 503.718.2430 Fax 503.598.1960 wwwtigard-or.gov FROM: ❑ Owner -i Applicant ❑ Contractor ❑ City Staff (check one) REFUND OR Name: Pacific Telecom Services INVOICE TO: (Business or Individual) Mailing Address: 1001 SE Water Ave., Ste 180 City/State/Zip: Portland,OR 97214 Phone No.: 503.708.9200 PLEASE TAKE ACTION FOR THE ITEM(S) CHECKED (1: Z CANCEL/VOID PERMIT APPLICATION. ® REFUND PERMIT 1±ES (attach copy of original receipt and provide explanation below). ❑ INVOICE FOR FEES DUE (attach case fee schedule and provide explanation below). ❑ REMOVE/REPLACE CONTRACTOR ON PERMIT(do not cancel permit). Permit#: CUP2014-00001,VAR2014-00007 Site Address or Parcel#: 13835 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 Project Name: PD32 Hall and McDonald,AT&T Cell Site Subdivision Name: 2S102DD00901 Tax Lot Lot#: EXPLANATION: Couldn't come to reasonable lease terms with the underlying land owner oeif Signature: .,, �_ Date: 8.5.14 a • n1 ps Print Name: 1 efund Policy 1. The Community Development Director or Building Official may authorize the refund of: any fee which was erroneously paid or collected. b) not more than 80%of the land use application fee when an application is RithdraRn or canceled before any review effort has been expended. c) not more than 80%of the land use application fee for issued permits. d) not more than 80%of the building plan review fee when an application is canceled before any plan review effort has been expended. e) not more than 80%of the building permit fee for issued permits prior to any inspection requests. 2. All refunds will be returned to the original payer in the form of a check Please allow 3.4 Reeks for processing refund requests. Rte to Sys Admin: Date By Rte to Bldg Admin: Date By Refund Processed: Date By Invoice Processed: Date $y Permit Canceled: Date By Parcel Tag Added: Date By Receipt# Date Method Amount S [:\Building\Forms\RcgPermit.Action_o62614.doc APPLICANT MATERIALS F Mar 31 14 01;46p Charles Coiling 50364.J3194 p,2 e RECEIVED APR 1 $ 2014 0%e CITY OF TIGARD 1t City of Tigard PLANNING/ENGINEERING Land Use er 1. Application1 PRE-APP.HELD BY: He# 010-1)ca?014•-6'i)i Other Case# V A R c?C3 14 — 0 c t)c) 7 Date 4--I'Li-/µ By „ILI!'•(--0-1---1-') Receipt# [ Fee Date Complete TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLY-IN( FOR. Ix 1 Adjustment/Variance(ET) 0 Historic Overlay(II or III) i xi Site Development Renew(II) p Comprehensive Pl n.\mendmcnt(IV) Q Home Occupation(II) 0 Subdivision(II or 111) ❑Conditional Use(111) 0 Minim Land Partition(II) ❑Zone Change(III) Q Development Code Amendment(IV) Q Planned Development GTO ❑Zone Change Annexation(IV) ❑Downtown Design Review(I[,Ill) fl Sernitrve Lands Review(II or III) NOTE: FOR REQUIRED SunMr'rTAL ELEMENTS,PLEASE REFER TO YOUR PRE-.APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES Ii) ILIUM!i11.It:iPKt1PU7Su).4CtIVErf WWI 1)1t1.1:(4,thin-esmfatatellie) -- ` 13835 SW Hal! Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 'r tXN1#M1'.!P T.I.\1 l)l Nifi 2S102D000901 ro1'Il..i'li }fit; !.471,1\.:ILL.titIIC.+1ION 1925 sq. ft., not including access drive R4.5 ... .,.. _,_ -- - ---—•--------- - -- --- - - _ ort N;WI. New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC (Zech Phillips, PTS, Applicant Agent) it7 i.ENc m)011,.. ., .1.-f trti i P.ez 1' 1001 SE Water Ave., Ste 180, Portland, OR 97214 503/232-5213 E.KINlhltI LC IN-1,%1'I 0 FAS 4Y, tf',.t ti;k - - Zach Phillips 5031708-9200 cell t-PL.ltt. zp hi flip s©ptswa,corn r _ __ Lam.. -- - .t • IPM. t111T{PUNA,1)1-T3.)illiI.ntSltdrodifeudinLe,ynncm.1.-- Charles Coffins NMI IJit:,N.apltl:.v(.rtl'.'St'.I 11n'z-P -- 13835 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 4'114.1NC NU INS.No. -- 5031936-4529 )When the owner and the applicant am different people, the applicant muse he lie purchaser of recotd nr a lessee in pus;=esston with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the rhvlter. The owners must sign this appG4snou in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a w-rinen authorization with this a' al:canon. Attaviis.u.}L'UKIet'1"(Plex., eIre,Ke) Install new 100' monopole aril equipment shelter for a nes+,AT&T wireless communication facility. Siteia , include 12 panel antennas on the monopole ane .an access drive. Mal 31 1401:46p Charles Coning 5036. X3194 p.3 THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • If the application is granted, the applicant shall exercise the tights granted iu accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan,attachments,and exhibits transmitted herewith,are true;and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued,based on this application,map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant bas read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s). SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. fJ - lr `I �, J! b:—(E-66/sZ'-/ r, /4,/ rr. f 01 eqsSigna re (� Date / �i.C1 r4 4.q' `d tlirt L Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date 14ia;i ApplicaegDine ''t (native's Signature D(te _ � Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date -rte 1001 SE Water Ave.,Ste 180 Portland,OR 97214 REcEIVEDCitY of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd APR 1 4,2014 Tigard, OR 97223 CITY OF TICARD GENERAL INFORMATION PLANNING/ENGINEEFtiNG Project: New Wireless Communication Facility with a 100' Monopole (PRE2013-00031) Applicant: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC (Zach Phillips, PTS, Applicant Agent) 1001 Water St., Ste 180 Portland, OR 97214 503/232-5213 zphillipsc ptswa.com Landowner: Charles Collins 13835 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Address of Project: 13835 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Map Number(TLNO) 2S102DD00901 Current Zoning: R-4.5 Current Uses: Residence, vacant Zach Phillips is submitting this application on behalf of New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ("AT&T"); and the underlying property owner, Charles Collins. Dear Planning and Zoning: On behalf of New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ("AT&T"), PTS is requesting to install a new 100' monopole in the City of Tigard to provide improved wireless communications coverage for its customers and collocation opportunities for other carriers. This site is located in a suburban area that has poor coverage. There are not any collocation options that meet the height requirements within the search area. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: AT&T proposes to install a new 100' monopole with 12 antennas at the top on Parcel # 2S102DD0090 (the "Property"). The Property is a landlocked parcel, adjacent to 13835 SW Hall Blvd. and currently is not addressed. The Property is currently undeveloped and zoned residential. The proposed site will include a new 100' monopole with 12 antennas at the top. The antennas will provide coverage in the area for the three radio technologies that AT&T uses. � r There will be support equipment located inside of a shelter on the ground within a fenced and landscaped compound. Access to the site will be taken from an improved access drive off of Hall Blvd. Attached is a an AT&T RF Justification report that details the coverage objective and the need for the proposed wireless communication facility; see Exhibit 1, "PD32 Hall Blvd and McDonald, RF Justification". SYSTEM INFORMATION AT&T is upgrading and expanding its wireless communications network throughout Oregon including the installation of the latest 4th Generation (4G), Long Term Evolution (LTE) radio technology as well as older 3G radio technologies at the site. Upon completion of this update, AT&T will operate a state-of-the-art digital network of wireless communications facilities throughout the proposed coverage area as part of its nationwide wireless communications network. Please see Exhibit 1, RF Justification, for detailed information on the capacity gap and transition to 4G LTE service that the proposal will address. The need for service in this particular geographic area is determined by market demand, coverage requirements for a specific geographic area, and the need to provide continuous coverage from one site to another in a particular geographic region. Once the need for additional coverage in a particular area has been established, AT&T's radio frequency ("RF") engineers perform an RF engineering study to determine the approximate site location and antenna height that is required to provide service in the desired coverage area. AT&T's RF engineers identify an area that is called a "search ring" where a site may be located in order to provide service in the desired coverage area. . The RF engineer takes the following objectives into consideration when identifying the search ring: 1. Coverage. The antenna site must be located in an area where the radio frequency broadcasts will provide adequate coverage within the significant gap in coverage. The RF engineer must take into consideration the coverage objectives for the site as well as the terrain in and around the area to be covered. Since radio frequency broadcasts travel in a straight line and diminish as they travel further away from the antennas, it is generally best to place an antenna site near the center of the desired coverage area. However, in certain cases, the search ring may be located away from the center of the desired coverage area due to the existing coverage, the surrounding terrain, or other features which might affect the radio frequency broadcasts like buildings or sources of electrical interference. 2. Clutter. AT&T's antennas must "clear the clutter" in the area. The radio frequencies used in AT&T's systems are adversely affected by trees, buildings, and other natural and man-made obstacles. AT&T's radio frequencies do not penetrate mountains, hills, rocks or metal, and its radio frequencies are diminished by trees, brick and wood walls, and other structures. Therefore, AT&T's antennas must be installed above or close to the "clutter" in order to provide high quality communications services in the desired coverage areas. PD32 Hall and McDonald In addition, if the local code requires us to accommodate additional carriers on the structure, the structure must be even higher in order to allow the other carriers' antennas to clear the clutter as well. 3. Call Handoff. The antenna site must be located in an area where the radio broadcasts from this site will allow seamless call handoff with adjacent sites. "Call handoff' is a feature of a wireless communications system which allows an ongoing telephone conversation to continue uninterrupted as the user travels from the coverage area of one antenna site into the coverage area of an adjacent antenna site. This requires coverage overlap for a sufficient distance and/or period of time to support the mechanism of the handoff. 4. Quality of Service. Users of wireless communications services want to use their services where they live, work, commute and play, including when they are indoors. AT&T's coverage objectives include the ability to provide indoor coverage in areas where there are residences, businesses and indoor recreational facilities. 5. Radio Frequencies used by System. The designs of wireless communications systems will vary greatly based upon the radio frequencies that are used by the carrier. If the carrier uses radio frequencies that are in the 850 MHz to 950 MHz range, the radio signals will travel further and will penetrate buildings better than the radio frequencies in the 1900 MHz band. As a result, the wireless communications systems that use the lower radio frequencies will need fewer sites than the wireless communications systems that use the higher radio frequencies. AT&T's system in the City of Tigard uses frequencies in the 850 MHz and 1900 MHz range, so AT&T's system requires more sites in order to achieve the same coverage that is provided by the carriers which use only the 850 MHz to 950 MHz frequency band. 6. Land Use Classifications. AT&T's ability to construct a cell site on any particular property is affected by Oregon state law and the City of Tigard's regulations. This can be a challenge when trying to provide adequate in building coverage in residential zones that can be very restrictive. AT&T looks for areas where there are gaps in coverage and then issues a "search ring" where a new facility can close the coverage gap. Typically a search rings is fairly small because a new site needs to integrate into the existing network. The search ring for this proposal covered just a few blocks and took into consideration the many tall trees, which reduce 3G and 4G coverage. AT&T's coverage propagation software systems use these and other factors (type of antenna; antenna tilt, etc.) to predict the coverage that will be provided by the proposed site. This proposed project would allow AT&T to provide wireless communications service in the significant gap in coverage in this area, and allow for uninterrupted wireless service with fewer dropped calls, improved call quality, and improved access to additional wireless services that the public now demands. This includes emergency 911 calls throughout the Hall Blvd. and SW McDonald St. area. PD32 Hall and McDonald t � APPLICABLE LAW Federal, state and local laws will apply to this application. Under the City of Tigard's code, new wireless cellular/PCS facilities that include support structures are subject to a Conditional Use Review, Type II (Chapter 18.798, WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES, 18.798.060 Uses Permitted Subject to Conditional Use Review) Federal law, primarily found in the Telecommunications Act, acknowledges a local jurisdiction's zoning authority over proposed wireless facilities but limits the exercise of that authority in several important ways. First, a local government must approve an application for a wireless communications site if three conditions are met: (1) there is a significant gap in coverage; (2) the carrier has shown that the manner in which it proposes to provide service in the significant gap is the least intrusive on the values that the community seeks to protect as allowed by applicable law; and (3) there are no potentially available and technologically feasible alternatives that are less intrusive on the goals that the community seeks to protect as allowed by applicable law. 47 U.S.0 Section 332(c)(7)(A) and (B)(i)(II); and T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. City of Anacortes, 572 P.3d 987 (9th Cir. 2009). In addition, under the Telecommunications Act, the City of Tigard is prohibited from considering the environmental effects (including health effects) of the proposed site if the site will operate in compliance with federal regulations. 47 U.S.C. Section 332(c)(7)(B)(iv). Therefore, this issue is preempted under federal law and any testimony or documents introduced relating to the environmental or health effects of the proposed site should be disregarded in this proceeding. Finally, the Telecommunications Act requires local jurisdictions to act upon applications for wireless communications sites within a "reasonable" period of time. The Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") has issued a "Shot Clock" rule to establish a deadline for the issuance of land use permits for wireless facilities. According to the FCC, a reasonable period of time for local government to act on wireless applications is 90 days for a co-location application and 150 days for all other applications. This time period includes all application notice and appeal periods. Therefore, under federal law, the reasonable time period for the City of Tigard's review of this application is 150 days PD32 Hall and McDonald JUSTIFICATION CRITERIA: Tigard Municipal Code - Title 18: Community Development Code The following sections address the review criteria relevant for this project. Chapter 18.798 WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES 18.798.060 Uses Permitted Subject to Conditional Use Review A. Uses permitted. The hearings officer shall review the uses subject to conditional use review, by means of a Type IIIA procedure, as regulated by Section 18.390.050 using approval criteria contained in subsection B of this section. The following uses are subject to approval under this section: 1. Towers in residential zones. A tower, including antennas, other support equipment and/or accessory equipment buildings, in any residential zone; Applicant Response: Proposed facility is a new tower located in a residential zone. A Conditional Use Review is required. B. Review criteria. Any use subject to review per subsection A of this section, shall be evaluated using the following standards: 1. Protection of points of visual interest. a. Views from residential structures located within 250 feet of the proposed wireless communication facility to the following points of visual interest shall be protected to the greatest practical extent: i. Mountains; ii. Significant public open spaces; iii. Historic structures. Applicant Response: There are not any points of visual interest, as defined by the code, which will be impacted. Visual points of interest that could be viewed within 250'of the proposed facility are all obstructed by tall trees, buildings, and geography. The proposed tower will not obstruct views of Mt. Hood or of the Coastal Range. b. The following standards, and only the following standards, shall be used to protect the above identified points of visual interest to the greatest practical extent if views from a residential structure located within 250 feet from a proposed wireless communication facility to a point of visual interest specifically identified above is significantly affected: i. Investigate other locations within the same lot where such visual impacts can be minimized overall; PD32 Hall and McDonald ii. Investigate alternative tower designs that can be used to minimize the interruption of views from the residence to the point of visual interest; iii. Minimize visual impacts to the point of visual interest referred to above, by demonstrating that collocation or the use of other structures within the applicant's service area is not feasible at this time; iv. Minimize visual impacts by varying the setbacks or landscaping standards that would otherwise be applicable, so long as the overall impact of the proposed development is as good or better than that which would otherwise be required without said variations. Applicant Response: Minimizing the visual impact of the proposed facility was critical in selecting the location of the proposed wireless facility. It is substantially obstructed from view from most locations by existing trees and buildings. The location on the lot was selected because it allowed for good access, was setback from wetland areas, and was well screened. When looking for potential locations to install a new facility collocation is the preferred alternative. Unfortunately, there are not any collocation opportunities available that would provide the needed coverage. 2. Color. Towers shall have a non-reflective surface and a neutral color that is the same or similar color as the supporting structure to make the antennas and related equipment as visually unobtrusive as possible, or, if required by the FAA, be painted pursuant to the FAA's requirements; Applicant Response: The proposed tower will have a non-reflective surface and can be painted any color that the jurisdiction deems appropriate. We have provided simulations with a tower that is painted green, but that color is not required. Preliminary research has demonstrated that the proposed tower will not need FAA striping or lighting, see Exhibit 2. 3. Setbacks. Towers shall be set back from the property line by a distance equal to the height of the tower. A Type II adjustment may be obtained to reduce this setback, subject to criteria of approval contained in Section 18.370.020.0.10, (Applicant will respond to C.8 criteria; Planning Dept. confirmed C.10 is error); 8. Adjustments to wireless communication facilities (Chapter 18.798). a. By means of a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, the director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny a request for an adjustment to the requirement that a wireless communication tower be set back at least the height of the tower from any off-site residence based on findings that at the following criteria are satisfied: PD32 Hall and McDonald i. The proposed location of the tower complies with the setback requirements for the underlying zone in which the property is located; Applicant Response: The setback standards for the R4.5 zone, as outlined in table 18.510.2, are 20'for the Front Yard, 5'feet for Side Yards, and 25'for Rear Yard. ii. A structural engineer certifies that the tower is designed to collapse within itself; Applicant Response: This is a typical design standard for a monopole. When the pole is ordered this certification can be provided with the structural calculations. iii. Because of topography, vegetation, building orientation and/or other factor, a site closer to an off-site residence will equally or better reduce the visual impacts associated with the tower upon the off-site residence. Applicant Response: The proposed location of the monopole is surrounded by tall trees and will obstruct much of the facility from the view of off-site residence. 4. Tower spacing. No new tower in a residential zone shall be allowed within 2,000 feet of an existing tower. No new tower in nonresidential zones shall be allowed within 500 feet of an existing tower. If, having completed the collocation protocol outlined in Section 18.798.080 without success, the provider will be required to build a tower less than the distances specified above, it will be required to obtain a Type I adjustment governed by Section18.370.020.C.8.b; Applicant Response: See response on the following page- PD32 Hall and McDonald Dia•ram Showin• Closest Tower to Pro•used Site Closest \i - a, v--4, .. , ,. , .;♦ ta. existing tower \\ (58A) i it _ \ Ft •Via" 1 `• r tI 1l. 4 tr 1 I . ..P. �f\ r I ' 4 L fi•—"\ .. , c — . - - 4.1_1 •-,;' ,,,,., . 4,, — . ... . t „,,, v ;.,..rtz. ...... . . .. :\o: "s ...\\ ..,;,. .„ , O • ;:; • W-Edgewoee•St - tiT r s * ft --r -' ..138' 5 SW Hall Blvd, artlan-d—OR 97223, USA , Tioritc° .,.' .-. ,. „ -- — r g 'T . - Proposed a . "um nae "'�' �• � 1 .� '— tower location t rreearre ate date } between taro ports on tie ga.ne I 1 .v._s I sr , 3 - I►40 Urger 7.3$4-23 Feet �"2-1.4.1.4..t3EuroaTeehn`r re -.- I � —, Gwnd Length 2,2M5454 l 30Ro•eeerGoos ilt nee6nQ150.81 de¢ee: 4440W":7t P�Vr 'Gn - \ a Imagery,Dat-- - 2012 r.15.25'1:4- 45'55.58 LW e.ev..I54 ft eye alt S :'S`! i The closest tower with capacity for collocation is an SBA tower more than 2000 ft. away, see picture above. It is near an existing AT&T site and would not provide coverage for the current gap in service. 5. Lighting. No lighting shall be permitted on a tower except as required by the FAA; Applicants Response: Preliminary analysis has shown that FAA lighting will not be required. No other lighting will be proposed. 6. Fencing and security. For security purposes, towers and ancillary facilities shall be enclosed by a six-foot fence; Applicants Response: Proposed facility will have a six foot tall chain link fence with privacy slats. 7. Landscaping and screening. a. Landscaping shall be placed outside the fence and shall consist of evergreen shrubs which reach six-feet in height and 95% opacity within three years of planting. Applicants Response: Landscaping will be placed outside of the fence that will consist of evergreen shrubs which reach six feet in height and 95% of opacity within three years of planting. See proposed Landscape Plan on sheet L-1 of the plans. I PD32 Hall and McDonald b. When adjacent to or within residentially-zoned property, freestanding towers and accessory equipment facilities shall be screened by the planting of a minimum of four evergreen trees at least 15 feet in height at the time of planting. The planting of said trees shall be prescribed in number by a plan prepared by a certified arborist in locations that (i) most effectively screen the wireless facilities from residential uses and (ii) promote the future survival of the trees while limiting adverse effects of the trees on abutting properties. Existing evergreen trees at least 15 feet in height may be used to meet the screening requirement of this section if the arborist demonstrates that they provide screening for abutting residential uses Applicants Response: The proposed facility is on residentially zoned property with similarly zoned property adjacent. After speaking with City planning staff, it was ifv decided that a licensed landscape architect could design the landscape plan. Please c41-t see proposed Landscape Plan on sheet L-1 of the plans and Tree Preservation Plan on sheet L-2. rf�F,_ 8. Noise. Noise-generating equipment shall be sound-buffered by means of baffling, j. barriers or other suitable means to reduce the sound level measured at the property line to 50 dBA (day)140 dBA (night) when adjacent to a noise-sensitive land use and 75 dBA (day)/60 dBA (night) when adjacent to other uses. ft,/ r+I Applicants Response: The HVAC system on the equipment room will be a Marvair, Model AVPA36ACA. Included in this package is a matrix showing the different types ,„„4, of Marvair HVAC systems used on equipment shelters and their noise output, see «� attached Marvair Sound Data for the ComPac I and II Air Conditioners. The proposed equipment shelter will be approximately 20 feet from the south property line. Based upon the Marvair matrix, the loudest the HVAC will be at 20 feet is 63 dBA. Additional ----- sound mitigation may be needed unless the adjacent trees can be considered as k, � sound mitigation. Please see Noise Evaluation, Exhibit 3. .1.4cio 18.798.080 Collocation ProtocoliNet E. Applicant's obligation to analyze feasibility of collocation. If a response to a collocation /2�rsar, leg request letter is received by an applicant indicating an opportunity for collocation on an existing tower of another provider, the applicant shall make a good faith effort to analyze the f .-/c e.rJ feasibility of collocation. This analysis shall be submitted with an application for a freestanding tower. A good faith effort to investigate the feasibility of collocation on an existing facility shall be deemed to have occurred if the applicant submits all of the following information: 1. A statement from a qualified engineer indicating whether the necessary service can or cannot be provided by collocation at the potential collocation site; Applicant Response: Please see RF Justification, Exhibit 1 detailing the search area and the lack of available coverage. A team was sent out into the search ring to try and locate an existing structure where antennas could be installed and would have the needed height to provide coverage. After a thorough investigation; asking Twality PD32 Hall and McDonald Middle School if they would allow field light to be replaced with one with antennas, working with Portland General Electric to see about replacing one of their power poles, checking with a retirement home, apartment complex, and a church; it was determined that the proposed location was the best option available. ,ji,,,u/<,,.t 1,; (4, It should be noted that collocation is a preferred alternative to constructing a new site. If there were a good collocation opportunity that would provide similar coverage it would be selected over the current candidate. 2. Evidence that lessor of the potential collocation site either agrees or disagrees to collocation on his/her property; Applicants Response: AT&T is required by the Telecom Act to allow for collocation on its monopole. Also, collocation helps mitigate costs by generating rent. AT&T has Master Lease Agreements with the other carriers that relates specifically to collocation. Sheet A2 of the plans identifies a possible location for an another carrier to locate their support equipment. 3. Evidence that adequate site area exists or does not exist at the potential collocation site to accommodate ancillary equipment for the second provider and still meet all of the development standards required in the base zone; Applicants Response: There is additional space within the AT&T compound as well as outside the compound for additional support equipment, see sheets Al and A2. A typical shelter takes up approximately 300 sq. ft., and some carriers need considerably less space. 4. Evidence that adequate access does or does not exist at the possible collocation site. Applicants Response: Sheet Al shows where access will be taken by users of the monopole. There will be adequate access. Chapter 18.390 DECISION-MAKING PROCEDURES (Narrative discussion per pre-application report) 18.390.040 Tinnvill*aiiedure A. Preapplication conference. A preapplication conference is required for Type II actions. Preapplication conference requirements and procedures are set forth in Section 18.390.080.C. Applicant Response: Preapplication conference took place on 9/17/2013 B. Application requirements. PD32 Hall and McDonald 1. Application forms. Type II applications shall be made on forms provided by the director as provided by Section 18.390.080.E.1; Applicant Response: Appropriate application forms have been filled out per the pre- application report. 2. Submittal information. The application shall: a. Include the information requested on the application form; Applicant Response: Providing all of the detailed information outlined in the pre-application report. b. Address the relevant criteria in sufficient detail for review and action; Applicant Response: The criteria outlined in the pre-application report are addressed and responded to through the narrative process. c. Be accompanied by the required fee; Applicant Response: Fee that was quoted at the time of the pre-application conference has been provided. d. Include two sets of pre-stamped and pre-addressed envelopes for all property owners of record as specified in Section 18.390.040.C. The records of the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation are the official records for determining ownership. The applicant shall demonstrate that the most current assessment records have been used to produce the notice list; Applicant Response: This information was provided to the City of Tigard based upon the assessment records they could provide. Notice was made and a community meeting to discuss the proposal took place. e. Include an impact study. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the system, and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet city standards and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the community development code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirements, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. P032 Hall and McDonald Applicant Response: The proposal is for an unmanned wireless communication facility. There will not be any impacts upon most city systems. The only transportation impacts will be approximately one visit a month by a technician in a service vehicle, typically a pick-up truck or a van. The traffic impacts will be negligible. There will not be any new pavement added for roadways and the only substantial impervious surface will be from the 12'x 26' equipment shelter. The only noise generated at the site will be from the Marvair HVAC system on the equipment shelter. Please see attached noise information. Please see Noise Evaluation, Exhibit 3. The other subsections under Section 18.390.040 inform the applicant of the review procedures and the process. These are understood and are not specifically addressed but are acknowledged. 18.370.020 Adjustments A. Purpose. The purpose of this section is to establish two classes of special variances: Applicant Response: A Special Adjustment to the setback requirements will be needed for this proposal. 2. "Special adjustments" which are variances from development standards which have their own approval criteria as opposed to the standard approval criteria for variances contained in Section 18.370.020.C. Applicant Response: AT&T requests a Special Adjustment to the setback requirements from the south and east property lines. This will keep the proposed site away from identified sensitive areas and severe slope. (See response to 18.775.070 Sensitive Land Permits later in the narrative and Survey, Sheet SV1 of the plans for location of sensitive areas and slope.) It will also allow for additional future uses of the parcel. C. Special adjustments. 8. Adjustments to wireless communication facilities (Chapter 18.798). a. By means of a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, the director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny a request for an adjustment to the requirement that a wireless communication tower be set back at least the height of the tower from any off-site residence based on findings that at the following criteria are satisfied: i. The proposed location of the tower complies with the setback requirements for the underlying zone in which the property is located; PD32 Hall and McDonald Applicant Response: The setback standards for the R4.5 zone, as outlined in table 18.510.2, are 20'for the Front Yard, 5'feet for Side Yards, and 25'for Rear Yard. ii. A structural engineer certifies that the tower is designed to collapse within itself; Applicant Response: This is a typical design standard for a monopole. When the pole is ordered this certification can be provided with the structural calculations. iii. Because of topography, vegetation, building orientation and/or other factor, a site closer to an off-site residence will equally or better reduce the visual impacts associated with the tower upon the off-site residence. Applicant Response: The proposed location of the monopole is surrounded by tall trees and will obstruct much of the facility from the view of off-site residence, Chapter 18.705 ACCESS, EGRESS, AND CIRCULATION (Access discussion per pre-application report) 18.705.030 General Provisions A. Continuing obligation of property owner. The provisions and maintenance of access and egress stipulated in this title are continuing requirements for the use of any structure or parcel of real property in the City. Applicant Response: Existing access will be improved to conform with current site distance and roadway requirements. B. Access plan requirements. No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. Applicant Response: Site plan showing ingress and egress is provided. Construction details about how the roadway will be constructed to meet current building code requirements will be provided with the building permit submittal package. C. Joint access. Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided: PD32 Hail and McDonald t l # le*" 1 . Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; and Applicant Response: AT&T's access rights will be provided within the lease with Mr. Collins. The lease will be executed before construction starts. He owns the parcel where access will be taken from Hall Blvd. and the parcel where the site is located. 2. Copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. Applicant Response: AT&T will provide a redacted lease showing its access rights. D. Public street access. All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030.H and 18.705.030.1 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. Applicant Response: The existing access will be improved and will continue to provide access for users. AT&T is in the process of obtaining a revised right-of-way permit from the Oregon Department of Transportation, because Hall Blvd. is a State Highway. E. Curb cuts. Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030.N. Applicant Response: Driveway apron may need to be improved and will be in accordance to City and State code. F. Required walkway location. On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: 1. Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; Applicant Response: Proposal is for an unmanned telecommunications facility. Existing sidewalk will remain. 2. Within all attached housing (except two-family dwellings) and multi-family developments, each residential dwelling shall be connected by walkway to the vehicular parking area, and common open space and recreation facilities; Applicant Response: Proposal is for an unmanned telecommunications facility. Existing sidewalk will remain. PD32 Hall and McDonald 3. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum six-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum three-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; Applicant Response: Proposal is for an unmanned telecommunications facility. Existing sidewalk will remain. 4. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, other pervious paving surfaces, etc. Any pervious paving surface must be designed and maintained to remain well-drained. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. Applicant Response: Proposal is for an unmanned telecommunications facility. Existing sidewalk will remain. J. Minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial use. 1 . Vehicle access, egress and circulation for commercial and industrial use shall not be less than as provided in Table 18.705.3; TABLE 18.705.3 VEHICULAR ACCESS/EGRESS REQUIREMENTS: COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USES Required Parking Minimum Number of Minimum Access Minimum Pavement Spaces Driveways Required Width 0-99 1 30' 24' curbs required 100+ 2 30' 24' curbs required or 1 50' 40' curbs required Applicant Response: There will be approximately one vehicle trip a month to the site for New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC (dba AT&T Mobility). The access width being proposed is 20', which considering the use and the lack of heavy vehicle traffic seems appropriate. There is not enough room between the existing barn and adjacent property for a 30' wide access. The primary use of the parcel is residential and the monopole is a utility. We ! l request that the facility meet the 20'driveway width requirement outlined in: l; PD32 Hall and McDonald TABLE 18.705.1 VEHICULAR ACCESS/EGRESS REQUIREMENTS: RESIDENTIAL USE(SM.OR FEWER UNITS) Number Dwelling Minimum Number of Minimum Access Width Minimum Pavement Unit/Lots Driveways Required Width 1or2 1 15' 10' 3-6 1 20' 20' 2. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; Applicant Response: Access will be provided and located less than 50'of the facility. 3. Additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. Applicant Response: The proposal is for an unmanned telecommunications facility. After construction there will not be any heavy truck traffic. 4. Access drives in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus by one of the following: a. A circular, paved surface having a minimum turn radius measured from center point to outside edge of 35 feet; Applicant Response: This design is not being used. b. A hammerhead-configured, paved surface with each leg of the hammerhead having a minimum depth of 40 feet and a minimum width of 20 feet; Applicant Response: AT&T proposes a 30'x 40'access termination that will provide a turnaround similar to a hammerhead. See design on sheet A-1 of the plans. c. The maximum cross slope of a required turnaround is five percent. Applicant Response: The cross slope of the turnaround will not exceed 5%. 5. Vehicle turnouts, (providing a minimum total driveway width of 24 feet for a distance of at least 30 feet), may be required so as to reduce the need for excessive vehicular backing motions in situations where two vehicles traveling in opposite directions meet on driveways in excess of 200 feet in length; Applicant Response: The driveway is less than 200'in length. See design on sheet A-1 of the plans. PD32 Hall and McDonald 6. Where permitted, minimum width for driveway approaches to arterials or collector streets shall be no less than 20 feet so as to avoid traffic turning from the street having to wait for traffic exiting the site. Applicant Response: The driveway approach will be at least 20' wide. See design on sheet A-1 of the plans. Chapter 18/45 LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING (Landscaping discussion per pre-application report) 18.745.040 Street Tree Standards A. Street trees shall be required as part of the approval process for conditional use (Type Ill), downtown design review (Type II and III), minor land partition (Type II), planned development (Type Ill), site development review (Type II) and subdivision (Type II and Ill) permits, (7/--) Applicant Response: The review is a = = : ..=". -: - - or the proposed wireless facility and will need street tree standards addressed. However, there is a mature and dense stand of Conifer trees that border the property along the ROW obscuring everything from view except where there are driveway entrances. There is nowhere else on the subject property where additional street trees could be placed that are in or near the property. Also, the proposed wireless site is on a parcel that is not adjacent the ROW. Only the access driveway intersects the ROW. The following page provides pictures showing the existing trees and how they obscure the site from view. —� ( , ,01(6,1C-,91 PD32 Hall and McDonald r- . a Driveway entrance to proposed wireless facility Conifers 4, i i 1 5 Source: PTS Proposed location of wireless facility Conifers s 'f s a Picture Source: Google Earth PD32 Hall and McDonald 18.745.050 Buffering and Screening , B. Buffeting and screening requirements. , � JJS 1 . A buffer consists of an area within a required setback adjacent to a property line and having a depth equal to the amount specified in the buffering and screening matrix and containing a length equal to the length of the property line of the abutting use or uses. Applicant Response: After discussions with planning staff and review of the code it was determined that a screening was required despite the property being surrounded by tall trees. Four 15' Leyland Cypresses are proposed to be planted around the parking, access area of the proposed wireless facility. Thirty Wax Leaf Privet shrubs are proposed around the east, south, and west sides of the wireless facility. See landscape design on sheet L-1 of the plans. Chapter 18.765 OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS (Parking discussion per pre- application report) 18.765.040 General Design Standards A. Maintenance of parking areas. All parking lots shall be kept clean and in good repair at all times. Breaks in paved surfaces shall be repaired promptly and broken or splintered wheel stops shall be replaced so that their function will not be impaired. Applicant Response: AT&T will maintain its lease area to ensure that there is good access for service vehicles. B. Access drives. With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: 1. Access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; Applicant Response: The existing driveway will be improved to meet current safety standards. The driveway will be accessed by AT&T approximately once a month for service visits. 2. The number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; Applicant Response: The proposed improvements to the access drive are shown on sheet A-1 of the plans. The access drive will be gravel and increased to 20' wide and will meet current engineering standards. P032 Hall and McDonald 3. Access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; Applicant Response: The proposed access drive is shared with the residents that own the parcel where the site is located as well as the parcel where access need to be taken from the public roadway. This is a service drive for the unmanned AT&T facility. 4. Access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; Applicant Response: The final proposal will have a roadway design that meets this standard. This will likely require a few of the conifers that currently screen the property around the access drive to be removed. See picture of existing access below. AT&T is in the process of obtaining a revised right-of-way permit from the Oregon Department of Transportation, because Hall Blvd. is a State Highway. Current view from existinaccess drive to Hail Blvd. I MAI SC. • • Source: PTS 5. Access drives shall be improved with an asphalt, concrete, or pervious paving surface. Any pervious paving surface must be designed and maintained to remain well-drained; and PD32 Hall and McDonald v( Applicant Response: City planning staff indicated that they believed that an improved gravel access drive would be acceptable considering the low volume of traffic. 6. Excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Section 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. Applicant Response: A 40'x 30'access termination is proposed with adequate room for vehicles to turn around. C. Loading/unloading driveways. Applicant Response: Not applicable to this proposal. D. On-site vehicle stacking for drive-in use. Applicant Response: Not applicable to this proposal. E. Curb cuts. Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030.N. Applicant Response: Proposed drive will have a curb cut that complies with current access standards, including Section 18.810.030.N of City of Tigard's development code. F. Pedestrian access. Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. Applicant Response: The parking area is located on private property and will have pedestrian access for those who are allowed to access. There are not any sudden drop-off edges around the proposed facility. C. Parking lot landscaping. Parking lots shall be landscaped in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 18.745. Applicant Response: After discussions with planning staff and review of the code it was determined that a screening was required despite the property being surrounded by tall trees. Four 15' Leyland Cypresses are proposed to be planted around the parking, access area of the proposed wireless facility. Thirty Wax Leaf Privet shrubs are proposed around the east, south, and west sides of the wireless facility, See landscape design on sheet L-1 of the plans. H. Parking space surfacing. PD32 Hall and McDonald 1. Except for single-family and duplex residences, and for temporary uses or fleet storage areas as authorized in paragraphs H.3 and 4 below, all areas used for the parking or storage or maneuvering of any vehicle, boat or trailer shall be improved with asphalt, concrete, or pervious paving surfaces. Any pervious paving surface must be designed and maintained to remain well-drained; Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements 18.765-6 Code Update: 8/13 Applicant Response: Engineered design of proposed turn around (access termination) to be constructed of gravel, unless the City determines concrete is required. 2. Off-street parking spaces for single and two-family residences shall be improved with an asphalt, concrete, or pervious paving surface. Any pervious paving surface must be designed and maintained to remain well-drained; Applicant Response: Not applicable to this proposal. Proposal is for a wireless communication facility. 3. Parking areas to be used primarily for the storage of fleet vehicles or construction equipment may be surfaced in gravel when authorized by the approval authority at the time the site development approval is given. The director may require that the property owner enter into an agreement to pave the parking area: (a) within a specified period of time after establishment of the parking area; or (b) if there is a change in the types or weights of vehicles utilizing the parking area; or (c) if there is evidence of adverse effects upon adjacent roadways, water courses, or properties. Such an agreement shall be executed as a condition of approval of the plan to establish the gravel parking area. Gravel-surfaced parking areas may only be permitted consistent with the following: a. Gravel parking areas shall not be permitted within 100 feet of any residentially-zoned or residentially-developed area, Applicant Response: Proposed access termination is currently designed to be constructed of gravel. Pre-application report states that a there is not required parking for this use. b. Gravel access and/or parking areas shall not be allowed within 100 feet of any water course, Applicant Response: Proposed access termination is currently designed to be constructed of gravel. Pre-application report states that a there is not required parking for this use. Gravel access termination and access drive to be more than 100'away from any water course. c. Gravel parking areas shall not be allowed within 100 feet of any public right- of-way, and PD32 Hall and McDonald Applicant Response: Proposed access termination is currently designed to be constructed of gravel. Pre-application report states that a there is not required parking for this use. It will be located more than 200'from the public ROW d. A driveway which connects a gravel parking area with any public street shall be paved; Applicant Response: Proposed access termination is currently designed to be constructed of gravel. Pre-application report states that a there is not required parking for this use. 4. Parking areas to be used in conjunction with a temporary use... Applicant Response: Not applicable to this proposal. Proposal is for a permanent facility. I. Parking lot striping. Applicant Response: Not applicable to this proposal. J. Wheel stops. Applicant Response: Not applicable to this proposal. K. Drainage. Off-street parking and loading areas shall be drained in accordance with specifications approved by the city engineer to ensure that ponds do not occur except for single-family and duplex residences, off-street parking and loading facilities shall be drained to avoid flow of water across public sidewalks. Applicant Response: Current proposal maximizes the use of pervious surfaces to minimize any additional run-off caused by the proposed development. A drainage plan will be developed if the City determines that one is required. L. Lighting. A lights providing to illuminate any public or private parking area or vehicle sales area shall be arranged to direct the light away from any adjacent residential district. Applicant Response: No parking lighting is proposed. M. Signs. Signs which are placed on parking lots shall be designed and installed in accordance with Chapter 18.780, Signs. Applicant Response: No parking signs are proposed. N. Space and aisle dimensions. PD32 Hall and McDonald Applicant Response: Not applicable to this proposal. Chapter 18.775 SENSITIVE LANDS (Sensitive Lands discussion per pre-application report) Based upon the pre-application meeting with City planning staff and the City of Tigard's Sensitive Lands database, it appears that the proposed wireless communication facility will not impact sensitive lands. Following is a City of Tigard map showing the Clean Water Services Vegetated Corridor, outlined in pink. This corridor is identified as a sensitive land. The black arrow on the map shows the location of the proposed wireless communication facility. This clearly demonstrates that the wireless facility will not impact sensitive lands. 13835 SW HALL BLVD, TIGARD Planning: Sensitive Lands J LU ,, OP.� ARA S 1 -, ' -- ' LL 4 ii 4124 lic.l (/) ay.,., � � =_ t - Proposed AT&T facility ,P, / itiO CO •`-!--..:,---,,iiii- _ — "-) .J i 0 r,/� Legend 1 ,f = 1112/1111 aF CWS Vegetated Corridor tll . Jnra :Iv RLIS Slopes Greater 4. than 25% 1 / j 311 ,,/;' Tigard Local Wetland PO t /,1 kjA. Inventory f, .,_ 44* 1- JOHN C T P--' ',, --- .----, Significant Non-Significant 110 I al '� ; " 011ii ta H _ l ,r •/ ElJurisdictional M C D O N A L D ST Im ' 4 ',:i a,. CWS FEMA 100 Yr Flood ■ 18.775.070 Sensitive Land Permits (Steep Slopes discussion per pre-application report) A. Permits required. An applicant, who wishes to develop within a sensitive area, as defined in Chapter 18.775, must obtain a permit in certain situations. Depending on the nature and intensity of the proposed activity within a sensitive area, either a Type II or Type Ill permit is required, as delineated in Sections 18.775.020.F and G. The approval criteria for various kinds of sensitive areas, e.g., floodplain, are presented in subsections B through E of this section. PD32 Hall and McDonald Applicant Response: A Sensitive Land Permit will not be required for this proposal. See Clean Water Services, Service Provider letter, Exhibit 4. B. Within the 100-year floodplain. The hearings officer shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an application request within the 100-year floodplain... Proposed facility is not in a 100 year floodplain. C. With steep slopes. The appropriate approval authority shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an application request for a sensitive lands permit on slopes of 25% or greater or unstable ground based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied; There are steep slopes on the northwest end of the property, but not near the proposed site. See attached survey, sheet SV1 of the plans. The geotechnical report states: SITE CONDITIONS Surface Conditions The proposed lease area is vacant, level, and covered with grasses. An existing gravel driveway provides partial access to the lease area. There was no standing water present in the lease area at the time of our site visit. See attached geotechnical report, Exhibit 5. 18.790.030 Urban Forestry Plan Requirements A. Urban forestry plan requirements. An urban forestry plan shall: 1. Be coordinated and approved by a landscape architect (the project landscape architect) or a person that is both a certified arborist and tree risk assessor (the project arborist), except for minor land partitions that can demonstrate compliance with effective tree canopy cover and soil volume requirements by planting street trees in open soil volumes only; Applicant Response: Landscape Architect for this proposal is Teresa Long, State of Oregon Registration #552. 2. Meet the tree preservation and removal site plan standards in the Urban Forestry Manual; Applicant Response: Please see the Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan, a s - -_ Canopy Site Plan design on sheet L-2 of the plans. 44/ 3. Meet the tree canopy site plan standards in the Urban Forestry Manual; and Applicant Response: Please see the Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan, and Tree Canopy Site Plan design on sheet L-2 of the plans. P032 Hall and McDonald 4. Meet the supplemental report standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. There is adequate tree canopy on the site, four additional Leyland Cypress trees will be planted, and no trees will be removed. The tree tables on the following page are based upon the tree information in the survey, sheet SV1 of the plans. 10 of the trees are directly on the southern border of the property and their trunks share tax lots but have canopies that are well into the Property. Some trees were only identified as deciduous or evergreen. Complete information on all of the trees is not currently available. An additional tree survey can be done, if needed. Types of Trees on The Property Tree Type Cedar 2 Douglas Fir 14 Deciduous 7 Evergreen 6 Trees Details from Survey Trees Details from Survey—con't Trunk Douglas Fir 55 144,1 Diameter Evergreen 75 Tree Type in Inches Height in Feet Deciduous 3 Douglas Fir 20 82.8 Douglas Fir 50 119 Douglas Fir 16 75.1 Cedar 9 Evergreen 75 Cedar 5 Douglas Fir 12 Douglas Fir 9 Douglas Fir 10 Douglas Fir 11 62.7 Deciduous 18 50.1 Douglas Fir 16 70.5 Deciduous 12 39.7 Douglas Fir 17 73.8 Deciduous 2 Douglas Fir 18 67.9 Deciduous 2 Douglas Fir 20 71.7 Deciduous 2 Evergreen 75 Douglas Fir 22 98.1 Evergreen 67 Douglas Fir 18 74.7 Evergreen 58 Evergreen 84 Deciduous 24 62.3 B. Tree canopy fee. If the supplemental report demonstrates that the applicable standard percent effective tree canopy cover will not be provided through any combination of tree planting or preservation for the overall development site (excluding streets) or that the 15% effective tree canopy cover will not be provided through any combination of tree planting or preservation for any individual lot or tract in the R-1 , R-2, R-3.5, R-4.5 and R-7 districts (when the overall development site meets or exceeds the standard percent effective tree PD32 Hall and McDonald canopy cover), then the applicant shall provide the city a tree canopy fee according to the methodology outlined in the tree canopy fee calculation requirements in the Urban Forestry Manual. Applicant Response: There is adequate tree canopy on the site, four additional Leyland Cypress trees will be planted, and no trees will be removed. Tree canopy fee will not be required. CONCLUSION AT&T's proposed installation of a new wireless communication facility with a monopole meets all requirements of the City of Tigard's land use ordinances (to the extent they are not preempted by federal law), and the City should approve AT&T's proposal as designed, subject only to standard conditions of approval. if you have any questions regarding the submitted materials or the proposal, please contact me at 503/232-5213 or zphiilips@ptswa.com. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, r Zech Phillips Land Use and Ordinance Specialist PTS PD32 Hall and McDonald RECEIVED P D32 APR 1 if 2014L BLVDHALL BLVD & MCDONALD CITY OF TIGARD \ft..... ..-.-/ 13835 SW HALL BLVD PLANNING/ENGINEERING TIGARD, OR 97224 View #: 1 October 24, 2013 m _. IMPORIPPP -4 - • - 'i %+ - t • iII ' i "► f tq -el + . �. 01 r.� - L v PROPOSED AT&T PANEL ANTENNAS MOUNTED TO A PROPOSED 100'TALL MONOPOLE(ANTENNAS -- r - - - - ' /� Y„y _•y ,. fi g f ;;,1t AND MONOPOLE PAINTED GREEN TO MATGNI - - 4�_• U , 7,X.1.-- `,—, r r 1. r A Ta.t�. , 3 '' a r • .` f i ia tC.1 . .„4 - - 4x • e , - 4 NORTH ar . ` O. n. • • t Io # lailliPill _ fn A O W The illustration above is a representation of the proposed project based on information provided by the client.Actual construction may vary dependent on approved construction plans and therefore PTS 4Pacif:c Telecom Services)is not responsible for any post production design changes.Monotree disclaimer:(In the event that the proposed installation includes a monotree)The proposed installation is an artistic representation of a tree,and not intended to be an exact reproduction of an AT&T Mobility actual living tree.The final installation will have cables,cable ports,and various attachments,such as antennas,nuts,and bolts.While every effort will be made to disguise these components,they will not be readily apparent to the casual observer or passerby.However,upon close scrutiny,the true nature of the installation will be apparent, 19801 SW 72nd Avenues Tualatin, OR 97062 REV: Phillips by: CJL Pacific Telecom Services, LLC 2 Zech Phillips - Phone: (503) 708-9200 3199 C Airport bap Drive,Costa Mesa.CA 92626-3414 PD32 ' HALL BLVD & MCDONALD at&mt 13835 SW HALL BLVD \-►-----/ TIGARD, OR 97224 View #: 2 October 24, 2013 C e _ ,. _,. . _,,. ,.._. , . y .t. : € 1 _............,, A . .„ _„ „ } « : x, • -.. "-- ,. . _--. : .. ..„ . Lx_ _ ti t . . Y " at r + =. .' _ H �' .. ,y • P 'ill, ' 1 + # . /Wrtf f ..+,sem: •��, al fit t pi* IR ,� 1 SUBJECT SITE 11�iiyi� y . C r •� l s -..its:T NORTH:... PROPOSED AT&T PANEL ANTENNAS MOUNTED TO A PROPOSED 100'TALL MONOPOLE!ANTENNAS .. AND MONOPOLE PAINTED GREEN TO MATC.H! Mir' '` t; -.+ ,Jt. ,f 6 s j{I 3p fez ''.t H , a,-_-_ — i, Vi - i�. -, - Std _.-� � . ,, . , . . iiii lher CD 11051011rx•- __t CL The illustration above is a representation of the proposed project based on information provided by the client.Actual construction may vary dependent on approved construction plans and therefore PTS{Pacific Telecom Services)is not responsible for any post production design changes.Monotree disclaimer.(In the event that the proposed installation includes a monotree)The proposed installation is an artistic representation of a tree,and not intended to be an exact reproduction of an AT&T Mobility actual living tree.The final installation will have cables,cable ports,and various attachments,such as antennas,nuts,and bolts.While every effort will be made to disguise these components,they will not be readily apparent to the casual observer or passerby.However,upon close scrutiny,the true nature of the installation will be apparent. 19801 SW 72nd Avenue � _� Tualatin, OR 97062 AE`s: Prepared by: CJI. Pacific Telecom Services, LLC 2 Zech Phillips - Phone: (503) 708-9200 3199CAirport Loop Drive.Costa Mesa,CA92626-3414 PD32i✓ HALL BLVD & MCDONALD a t&t 13835 SW HALL BLVD \'`.....--.---/ TICARD, OR 97224 View #: 3 October 24, 2013 - I' PROPOSED AT&T PANEL ANTENNAS x - 1 `f (NOT SEEN IN THIS VIEW) ". .s IT j• eill a I.-.,b' • • { �2f it �1,Ry { . •` Y.' �? R �..`. ...- „ • �y�;. .- '._ ti r 1►. i ' 4—tea,-. ,.•,s.a - .J y{ i •_ hR l �I ' • •w .. r. +r. ♦. . /•, ..-"moi • ,,,,en - li. s• we, }': F+I. i ,•1 4 •• . f � - �. +yam R. - h•q ,. a�, rJfiir _ s,�C, - -_.i �eo � f "s 'Lim.- x iw £/f ��v 4/,� r SUBJECT SITE ' di k i . ..r .- -.. :AI -A e 4111te" t\ ,_ PROPOSED AT&T 100'TALL MONOPOLE(BY v K-- - 44111"111.411 OTHERS&PAINTED GREEN TO MATCH) � � .•x f . •. ' Ite.' - '. „lee • .' j �rq .1,,.. +�d.- PROPOSED AT&T tf`•S"x26 PRE•FABRICAT€D - - - �.�W, 7 t'L * . • • EQUIPMENT SHELTER WITH GENERATOR ROOM is ' , ems „-- a, _` s r,. ' - INSIDE A CHAIN LINK FENCED COMPOUND - —.- �. 'i�5 sW 3J' •' 471riliiikii- �rn r ,r • ",, �.. 9 to T it ., 3"7 • Ii !i ii;, �r y da ' O 7 n F 0 Illi B. IL f The illustration above is a representation of the proposed project based on information provided by the client.Actual construction may vary dependent on approved construction plans and therefore PTS(Pacific Telecom Services)is not responsible for any post production design changes.Monotree disclaimer:(In the event that the proposed installation includes a monotree)The proposed installation is an artistic representation of a tree,and notintended to be an exact reproduction of an AT&T Mobility actual living tree.The final installation will have cables,cable ports.and various attachments,such as antennas,nuts,and bolts.While every effort will be made to disguise these components,they will not be readily apparent to the casual observer or passerby.However,upon close scrutiny,the true nature of the installation will be apparent. 19801 SW 72nd Avenue REV• Tualatin, OR 97062 Prepared by: CJL Pacific Telecom Services, LLC 2 Zech Phillips - Phone: (503) 708-9200 3199 C Airport Loop Drive,Costa Mesa.CA 92626-3414 PD32 HALL BLVD & MCDONALDat&t 13835 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD, OR 97224 V1ew #: 4 October 24, 2013 ,...a rr r►y' ' #. t �' } PROPOSED AT&T PANEL ANTENNAS MOUNTED TO -f M,M _ •.�. r"t A PROPOSED 100'TALL MONOPOLE(ANTENNAS 1. r ', _r ,� -� AND MONOPOLE PAINTED GREEN TO MATCH) ila ,� 9s$ 4 , `may-:I it-''' ---r-1.1--. ‘7;;J'1-F' ''''. -7' ... - . 1? • + s= �4 - .. a—� - '�! • �, by S- O ,-. ' • { k -6441011C-#. _, e...o."r' 1. A .1�i , • • �� afi da 4 , ' SUBJECT SITE ' _ ',� +: I, }� y f j v - �� �- ice` ffi '�'" ! �•, . r�,'.'�� « ; i .5!,� I' � r1'• ams ,-,4A f• s s„ • o > ' 1P i v�1 sal ` . T• P' r 11 'r s ,-.1-r.�+/ 4 i . i ; r' µ r • y e� lavr °4 � _ s ". ,-,* NORTH .,, .- r • ......,.._.;5„... . . _ _____,_ , , _____ ... ..... ---7, _ } • ' - - r..icomr.ww�. - `J, 'fomes � �� ir; �4"10�: - - Y ��Zf`. .4 Lam_ •!_+/tel iT_,i 4 r • - - —.__."_`_._ -. ________„.._ _ r......_________ ___ .. _• .. -v.-- __ _ #_ - � ' --. -- �- r �' - .-. The illustration above is a representation of the propusei project based on information provided by the client.Actual construction may vary dependent on approved construction plans and therefore PIS iPacific Telecom Services)is not responsible for any post production design changes.Monotree disclaimer:(In the event that the proposed installation includes a monotree)The proposed installation is an artistic representation of a tree,and not intended to be an exact reproduction of an AT&T Mobility actual living tree.The final installation will have cables,cable ports„and various attachments.such as antennas,nuts,and bolts.While every effort will be made to disguise these components,they will not be readily apparent to the casual observer or passerby.However,upon close scrutiny,the true nature of the installation will be apparent. 19801 SW 72nd Avenue 1 . REV: TUaIa$in, OR 97062 Prepared by: CJL Pacific Telecom Services, LLC 2 Zech Phillips - Phone: (503) 708-9200 3199 C Airport Loop Oriwe,Costa Mesa.CA 92626-3414 ' 'S at&t LEGEND {mobility SUBJECT BOUNDARY UNE --—-—-—-- RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTERLINE I :,_ _ _ RIGHT-OF-WA" LINE _ - - _ _ - - - - ADJACENT BOUNDARY UNE ' SW REGINA LANE = SECTIONAL BREAKDOWN LINE 0 -yw OHF OVERHEAD POWER LINE ��w EL — yP ,Ca—I' — BURIED POWER LINE 2 0 BURIED GAS UNE l•- I 0HT—0Hr OVERHEAD TELEPHONE UNE PACIFIC TELECLOM SERVICES, W I /' 1 --uCr—ACT—� s— BURIED TELEPHONE ONE C LJ APN I APN - APN APR —w—w—w—w — BURIED WATER LINE Q 2S'02DDQ150Q 25102DDOSTOO /' ZS1D2DDO5J;O01 I 251O2p00960D O —SS—Ss—SS— BURIED SANITARY SEWER O / S —50 SO SD— BURIED STORM DRAIN &EiV /// E I CLLIN€ W I r ROCK RETAINING WA�.L CD f VEGETATION LINE 0 -x-x--x-x x=- CHAIN LINK FENCE W D_ Y20 14 - - - - --- - _ PROFER'Y(LINE - / I = WOOD FENCE <n - _ - _ � - O -x-x-x-x x BARBED WIRE/WIRE FENCE CL I El TRANSFORMER � PRE HYDRANT pl /. .,p TIG H SI� LIGHT STANDARD W GATE VALVE RD I QEt ` 15 V POWER VAULT W WATER METER :ENGINEERING UTILITY BOX FIRE STAND PIPE + Q d JY UTILITY POLE 0 CATCH BASIN, TYPE I 7 _ O J �' E— POLE GUY WIRE ® CATCH BASIN, TYPE If I Q m GAS VALVE SIGN E. pp 1 CI ® GAS METER E' BOLLARD = I2 I 1 TELEPHONE VAULT a MAJL BOX & I Q TELEPHONE RISER 234.21 SPOT'ELEVATIOr• aPN w c. 251030000902 F, EL Q. F. I r NOTE: I a S/1 O ALL Al&I ANTENNA MOUNTING HARDWARE, r MONOPOLE, EQUIPMENT AND FENCING TO • BE PAINTED FOREST GREEN I � a (_) -2 PROPERTYIUNE I = �_) y N APR 0 /ti J r I 25102D500900 ``-+C,,,�II G' S CC Ex1sT1NG ' 0 g o TREE PROPOSED AT&T 3O'-0' x to De 40--0'ACCESS TERMINATION ,/ O H•1 a AP 251020000903 ZONINGRLEGRASS /1 C VICINITY MAP - - - APEA �I k—; / I EXISTING ' - Z C� a J /� GRAVEL _ CRNEWAr BUIuTRlG u•—QwZEXISTING A.:w+.r v 4 se. r1; 1 :1:141P-11 2c.�7lx: 1:: I // 20°o sw'o€€cRAVEz \: oSITE11 1 cL ��� _ � ! ACCESS. ROAD .\\.1,'. ��,+,�', „ ...,.,-.....„ aig,:ftce....A I_ EXISTING, ------------1-13 -712-- — - �` REWIRED CLEAR t<.v A.,W w PROPERTY LANE TREES _� - _ VISION AREA _ 1l 251020006000 DATE OESCRIPTOw -wITIAr APR \�� o g *06/01/la 55SIim EOR PEG REHEw SS 7T.‘\7 )1. -// 5APN \ "` h PROPOSED AT&TAT3T UTILITY ROUTE 1. & , 2S1020005900 1 !j �N $ 3 1 i' 'J gum ISSUED FOR Flo REVIEW Cel[ 2S1OD0500BOR S W FA N N O t r, \T W/I4 REVISED AzD-s KIS APN 5 ` y f APN / - -�'�" ~pf7J/N REVISED FM'S MAC I 251020009,1 / +1 ; 1 zs-GZD500801 _0' 4ICREEK DRIVE _..I. ,..,.P f L EklsnNc �, PRDpgsED AT&T sot O au! (} I / t I L EXISTING I BUILDING-7 1 HE 'L Exl'STING f r ' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS &1ILpING� 1 I LABELED AS CONSTRUCTION SET \ 1 / I SHEET TILE SITE PLAN TRUE NORTH SHEET NUMBER www w M.wwww.b b ww"w iH mow} 24'x35"SCALE: 1- w 30'-0" i� J 3. SITE PLAN 1 -E INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS S PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY 'LEE CR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO CARRIER SERV GEE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Exhibit # 1 , RF Justification �%; at&t PD32 Hall Blvd and McDonald RF Justification Coverage Justification AT&T is proposing a new site, PD32 to be located near the intersection of SW Hall Blvd. and SW McDonald St. in the city of Tigard. This is a AT&T service area that has a significant 4G service coverage gap as illustrated in Exhibit A. The Exhibit shows the proposed site (Red star) and surrounding adjacent sites in Blue triangles. As can be seen, there is a large coverage gap in all areas not shaded in Green. It is important to clarify, that the area does have scattered 3G Low Band coverage today. But, due to capacity and user demand we need to enhance our service in the700 MHz and High Band spectrum that we have been authorized to use by the FCC. During times of high traffic demand or emergencies, wireless service will be degraded to all users due to congestion in our Low Band spectrum. In addition, our 3rd generation of wireless service will be obsoleted in the near future which will result in almost no — wireless coverage in this vicinity. Therefore, preparation must be made now for 4G coverage. This determination was a result of a combination of customer complaints, service requests and RF design analysis . This site will help improved indoor coverage to the residential neighborhoods around the intersection of SW Hall Blvd. and SW McDonald St. This site will also cover portion of SW Bonita Rd. heading East to 1-5 freeway and SW McDonald St. heading West to SW 100th Ave. The coverage gap is a defined geographic area where there is inadequate 4G Low Band 700 MHz signal coverage that is weaker than those levels defined in the Appendix where our customers phones have quality problems. Analysis also results from reviewing customer complaints and service requests. The proposed antenna tip height of 100 feet is the minimum necessary to encompass the required coverage gap relative to nearby complementary wireless facilities. Reducing the antenna height below this level will reduce the `effectiveness of the site and will make the proposed facility inadequate. Therefore, additional sites will be required. Exhibit B, illustrates the acceptable expanded level of service that will be provided with the addition of the proposed site at a antenna tip height of 100 feet. This is where an AT&T handset can be reliably used to make and receive telephone calls in the presence of varying signals. Exhibit C shows the locations of actual customer reported coverage issues each noted with Pink dots and t _ - -corresponds with our gap which further justifies and supports the need for enhanced at&t Exhibit A - Existing Service Coverage Map .___ ir .. ; 4 • .1.. i 111 .. -y .r .-r.r. • ,, 1 .... k ..t 1"Pr" . , . , \ 1l j'Ir; ."'... II!" '' c :•':; 14•7 NI,... 4t.. -.„,, ... r• 1 1 If a -14 - .. ..., . s. „ , _ _,... r„,...11.1 I.- 441P114 ir• n ., 'as#_ i- e cz ... , . .., -, e:- , 4 dirr k* c• .,.. '1• -;• t-• - - ' '' ,..-- . ,. " „ -.. if,P4i- . al 4411 • 4 i 1 4 , . . •' .4 : - kaL, . • . rtt , l- ' _ t 4",',.+111'.'4.A 0 • ,a., 6 , ' .. O.v" ••••• If 43,tpi-ti J . b. • • yi.6 311 • 2 /2 . flikt.. ' ? , g114••••• Me. flit i ik • '. L , t••••4. 4IP. a? ..re".t.:Y. tri .„, ,,. P., .01 r , ,-T• % _ k.,, ,. dr •" 1,, 0.- rs Ti 4,....,1 cot , . d- . -A.m. ,, ,,„ vzrop...ttitt, . IP t 4/ 4 ... .... 3v1 . •. . . 4:771 olio .. .g i , IA-. .c, I .... .r ire . ,-1-- 7 '. 0 '' pd.y. • ..- .in.: ': Park A • ' • ,,mme 44,1'7!SW. . •-• il— .' — •I:,+*.*v 4;, . . t **• •A., . .L„ • . A 4{I)-".-:.7.' der k :',. -•..4-*4111t Ili , .I lo * '... , Van, soffirfr vi"...ir ic.tAir.K'.--f:.tf A.aAAg.e b..%,i.af l, -.. r.•l 3• :t4t,Ir,;• %=,,. i..t-4Aa*i.i. i:r4.z/Ael1Rl.Ca*' _ • currentoeraEe ; I r, , 1.1 New Coverage . 7 gll , 4 - 4 - , , . 3,,,. ;-.') i , • . ..e, , , r_ ,.......) ,V,,t .`4.it"...-4 V-..•-,-F'"-l'Aitt,,. 1„„--, :II -4,... -..,_. „: - 4, MI,. • • *1• '---. 01." - ,. ? +,i,,, air,•. i;:e. ,--; ' ,..... Proposed',Ilea Site Location trt--/- a e - I f4AA •-- 4 •• _ c . . .. A IPA 1, ..; ,m,,.,„.. ,..,... ._4-e.,,Jit...Irri,..,„ 4 A , • •,...: . ...1 i. .. • , ,, 4 t. , ,, - * Alternative Site Location •,,,,14... „ ' Tr, i, a - et ift..,..1- Illti--...!,,, . ".1• . I t. # i A Existing Site Location IF rq: ' 1 '. 4, -.1..... ..,91--..k., 1 -' . .. . .0*. ---i- i IZ,.... ....1'f'-• a-A,4-..-•-• j.-' `,.i, • .... ' - Planned Site Location 0 Customer Reported Coverage Issues AO.1.1il .. - • ,.. -. , at8ct - . ... • • _ ... Exhibit B - New Service Coverage Map . ..., . , ., ..,. ....,.......,.. 4 __ IL_ • • '.. . - .. _ 'r;- • -,„ . -- ..:.. " , ,•( .,„ • ,. _ , ••. , - -,,,,,,, - -'31), Ak- 1. ,. -1'-i'' • ! -. • ' '.'''''''..4,0<igil,r ' '.' ' ' ''' -, • .. • .. • . , - .. Ili , s.-, .... • N , ...z., ,., 41*--,-4.- .,,,n., , .. _ .. arinoa,:4„th7t.r.,:,„ __ .. .. - _i. _ +...e-- w .4. AA .• , ••' 3.-4 t• . , I.. ..-. . • . .."- . - . litinir' , . _. k -240parEFAS *., 6. ,e,',.• T4,: /7,[... ; : i * idll h aezic 4 , \ 7 ifr • - - ._ . • AN, i giiii ralr 'i.. ,i.,',:RA r , ° ' 1 - . - /Z. •iln1-: I' . . ‘ 1 .9 ' 1.4/"...Da° ? .1'.' 4 ,* i , t . •. . i . jr t 4 i 4. :r -41 . .- - i !,,,:., ./.,..t41/4 ' 17410Fr.-- P4 w A '''s \•;': iv - •, +:4_,. . . 4 -i• i.y..- ' • • . * - .10 " **ce St:TT 4% "' - 7 .4 ih-- / • * 5 ' •z . r..,41* I. . .47. ,.. 4 .• ... ,,, ,c,, .,, ., . -. : j i , ir-117.*::::7,.." goy, --1. • --A-iv • • .... .. • II 4,6 'Ia 41.411, I. . ". : . . * 411 ..TVIT;4 till'1/.-: '''all il,641%., .t ' '77"1,, ..:1.,.-6.4.:lir- • . ot 7 -ca, 1113'14 . L 4LIA_ 1.."` 1 . Apt 117 I* .... • . Current Coverage s ..... , • I'5' 4-. ' il d • '.. ‘i. i _ 0 lalif •• --.. •,' i t It 1.... , 3 • .. New Coverage i 01 - 4. Z :-' .. , 6 - , A Proposed New Site Locationtirl.1r, rli • .- ;., , , .„ ,L OS -,- .,,r; : ..„... ,,,, . , . - • , ., 1 — .. - * • Alternative Site Location ift .7 ,..-;,.. ,., a --7'.,-,.;73,' i .k•'*' 4 --s *.„..c..." fl''-iji AExisting Site Location L. s'f :-3:-',.0.•'.'"..-1-f-,-i-r, t ....e It 1°(*•. .„F Planned Site Location 0 Customer Reported Coverage issues - .. ,41•1110_, . • - 700 at&t ., _. . . . Exhibit C - Customer Reported Coverage Issues . .. r ' ,' • y / r� ' * ' ''J4 -Wilt la .; P ri • 014 ,, =�,. s rig -ate,• • *Ai.: ,, I „,,, • • .! , .t a rg L �, - `.I •... {�,.i . y; • -` iY r ! . 1 �` 7• 4*~ ai- +_* _• -_,- v� ,�l'"._-611111.101‘ 'A• r lk - R Vl y-fi: ...0 ri - ,- ✓i ., >.M u IyJ T •4 +rte - • w x � 71�� Y_X741_ ` + •i • w. J .f ` f w.. .� a � "�'+S %%iii.,R s -• # - b •' .f ! w•' ir. :1 ��— is. 'tel - ''i ' • •�+ Y -� (.._r• 1=` . . •Pernbr.. s • • ♦' •.•' • * -Pil. ,, �7+y! +, M mai! f1a 1►i . •: 4• 1 1,,I , _ • ']''j��it• q d !i' JT' !"" 't.041�0,11X7.71r.5 _+� ., j.f i .� / ` ;$`' .1, ` _iv a . r •. Current Coverage r, I' �r, `r 5 - �.. .. ill Nevi Coverage • 1Vii;ii liti Proposed Nevi Site location" •,�' It 1. tl + i_ _ AltemataveSatet�cataan -. i•_42- , •• -. . •u, ��•�`� n�. '4' ` �� ,.€-`firth«.rI,.f ' � ..^ d',u1�ts -,a .atlCZ. • r10 ' j: �_- ,: :,:_11:77,45_ + j'+.i rh - ` -• ..ti - _ f ` A Existing Site Location �,.; _41,_''''' ..-v.--,-,-.--,-.-47 6_ C3 _ . •-•. 1 Planned Site Location 0 Customer Reported Coverage Issues Exhibit # 2, TOWAIR FCC Analysis .UR Search Results Page I of I TOWAIR Determination Results *** NOTICE *** TOWAIR`s findings are not definitive or binding, and we cannot guarantee that the data in TOWAIR are fully current and accurate. In some instances, TOWAIR may yield results that differ from application of the criteria set out In 47 C.F.R. Section 17.7 and 14 C.F.R. Section 77.13. A positive finding by TOWAIR recommending notification should be given considerable weight. On the other hand, a finding by TOWAIR recommending either for or against notification is not conclusive. It is the responsibility of each ASR participant to exercise due diligence to determine if it must coordinate its structure with the FAA. TOWAIR is only one tool designed to assist ASR participants in exercising this due diligence, and further investigation may be necessary to determine if FAA coordination is appropriate. DETERMINATION Results Structure does not require registration. There are no airports within 8 kilometers (5 miles) of the coordinates you provided. Your Specifications NAD83 Coordinates Latitude 45-25-12.0 north Longitude 122-46-01.4 west Measurements (Meters) Overall Structure Height (AGL) 30.5 Support Structure Height (AGL) 30.5 Site Elevation (AMSL) 57.3 Structure Type MTOWER - Monopole Tower Construction Notifications Notify Tribes and Historic Preservation Officers of your plans to build a tower. r - (CLO E!IN D VY http://wireless2.fcc.gov/U1sApp/AsrSearch/towairResult.jsp?printable 1/20/2014 ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE EVALUATION 1 AT&T Mobility Carrier Name: AT&T 19801 SW 72nd Avenue Client Project Name: Hall Blvd & McDonald Tualatin, OR 97062 Client Project Number: PD32 Project Street: 13835 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97224 Site Latitude: 45.42 Site Longitude. -122.7670 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: AT&T proposes the following Install two AC units outside a proposed shelter PROJECT SCOPE: The maximum permissible noise level for this site are described by City of Tigard Municipal Code. The scope of this report is to determine, using the recommended prediction methods outlined in the ANSI!AHRI Standard 275, if the equipment installation in question will be in compliance with all appropriate State and Local regulations in regards to noise levels. See Appendix B for a copy of the referenced regulation. SUMMARY RESULTS: For a wireless facility installation. the maximum allowable noise level in City of Tigard is 40 dBA at night time. The Combined A-Weighted Sound Pressure Level for this installation without mitigation is 53 dBA and mitigation is required It is recommended that a solid EW wall (1 25"or thicker plywood) 6' high x 6' long weighing more than 4 psf be installed south of shelter for sound mitigation to achieve barrier shielding factor of 14. The Combined A-Weighted Sound Pressure Level for this installation with mitigation is 39 dBA Based on our review of the proposed equipment installation, we determined the proposed site does not comply with City of Tigard Municipal Code for maximum permissible noise levels listed in this report. Therefore, mitigation is recommended. Please reference Section 4 for comments regarding the calculations. See Appendix A for the Calculations and Appendix B for cited codes and regulations We trust this addresses your concerns. Please contact us if there are any questions. Prepared By' Dinesh Kumar, P.E. Dated: April 3, 2014 CONTENTS: Report 1 - 3 Appendix A (Calculations) A Appendix B (Referenced Documents) B Appendix C (Vendor Literature and Additional Documents) C . • _ 1 Equipment Inventory Proposed Marvair Compac AC 72 AT&T Proposed Marvair Compac AC 72 AT&T Noise level given above is at a distance of 5' The sound level for the AC unit is provided by the manufacturer(see Appendix C) 2 Adjacent Properties 2510-2000-0901 Residential owner Source 2510-2000-0902 Residential 101 North 2510-2000-0900 Residential 78 East 2510-2000-0903 Residential 167 West 2510-2000-5900 Residential 23 South City of Tigard Maps, Planning Summary Distances are from equipment most near adjacent property line 3 Documents & Data Provided or Acquired The following data was used to figure the noise level for the site. Sound Power Calculation ANSI/AHRI Standard 275 AHRI Sound Power Equipment Specification Sheet Manufacturer Equipment Installed 100%Zoning Drawings PTS Title 18 City of Tigard Municipal Code City of Tigard 4 Calculation Comments Section 4 of the of AHRI Standard 275 provides the methodology for estimating the A-Weighted Sound Pressure Level (A-WSPL)at a given location resulting from outdoor unitary equipment. The result includes factors for location, barrier, shielding, sound path, and distance where applicable. These factors modify the base noise level to arrive at an A-WSPL. The basic procedure for estimating A-WSPL(s)at a given point of interest consists of summing the A-WSPL Rating of the equipment with the Equipment Location Factor and then subtracting the Barrier Shielding Factor and the Sound Path Factor, and the Distance Factor. The resultant is the A-WSPL. 5 Conclusion To the best of our knowledge and belief, the worst-case noise levels of the proposed equipment will be in satisfactory compliance with the requirements of the current state and local guidelines after the sound mitigation measures recommended in this report have been taken. 6 Disclaimer This report was performed in accordance with generally accepted practices of other consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time and in the same locale under like circumstances. The conclusions provided are based solely on the information provided by the client. The observations in this report are valid on the date of the investigation. Any additional information that becomes available concerning the site should be provided so that our conclusions may be revised and modified, if necessary. This analysis is considered void if the equipment mentioned in this report is changed or different as installed. It is the responsibility of the Client to ensure that the information provided and used in the completion of this report is correct and comprehensive. In the absence of information to the contrary, we assume that the equipment listed is a complete inventory that will provide a worst- case scenario for noise level. All services are performed, results obtained, and recommendations made in accordance with generally accepted practices and principles. PTS is not responsible for the conclusions, opinions and recommendations made by others based on the information we supply. A Appendix — Sound Pressure Level Calculations A-Weighted Sound Pressure Levels Worst Case Lot 2510-2000-5900 Residential 23 South The lot closest to the installation is examined for compliance. Table of Pressure Levels and resulting A-WSPL for the Worst Case Lot Marvair Compac AC 72 3 0 0 25 50 103,787 Marvair Compac AC 72 3 0 0 25 50 103,787 Combined A-WSPL, LpCA 6= 53 It is recommended that a solid EW wall (1.25"or thicker plywood)6' high x 6' long weighing more than 4 psf be installed south of shelter for sound mitigation to achieve barrier shielding factor of 14. Residential 72 3 14 0 25 36 4,132 Residential 72 3 14 0 25 36 4,132 Combined A-WSPL, LpcA 6= 39 Equipment 11/' u_ * From ANSI/AHRI 275 Table 2 ♦—Point of evacuation L= Lt +L2- D For L1 = 5'and L2=D -23' (Conservative) BarrierL= 5(1.5 m) Figure 4. Heavy Continuous Wall Barrier Factor= 14 AHRI 275 References: 1 Section 4.1.1 2 Section 4.1.2 3 Section 4.1.3 ° Section 4.1.4 Equation 2 5 Section 4.2 b Section 4.3.1 Equation 3 B Appendix — Supplemental Information Governing Codes and Regulations City of Tigard Municipal Code Chapter 18.798 Wireless Communication Facilities Noise. Noise-generating equipment shall be sound-buffered by means of baffling, barriers or other suitable means to reduce the sound level measured at the property line to 50 dBA(day)/40 dBA(night) when adjacent to a noise-sensitive land use and 75 dBA(day)/60 dBA(night)when adjacent to other uses. This regulation is the same for 18.798.050- Uses Permitted Subject to Site Development Review and 18.798.060- Uses Permitted Subject to Conditional Use Review For a wireless facility installation, the maximum allowable noise level in City of Tigard is 40 dBA at night time. Appendix C — Vendor Literature and Additional Documents r- LEGEND ---IrMAmf pourrower ow •- --NNW-at.RN'ENITEN AR - 1 trarr-or-UN ENE SW REGINA LANE f x m.o./1114..011%ow. OP-1.0-.-CACIowAti SOWER URI = I NA RA-- MI, WINE3.04.11 UK LW.06 AWL ---O.-ENEINCNI TILFANNE LAN PROM TELLOON NEWIRCES. . ELC '1 1 ,'--- .--i . 111 .I.I.I /I"' [ 'P EL 6 _,,„.._.,..-53555 mass,irr -•-•-•-.-NINO NMI Lac -EA-N-0-BAD WIMP!Sr.f. —1/11—0—0—RIM 1 NrIlnii MOM / .' 0,..ANE/Nall ora X ,I , Roar Arawest Ma. C.J / ' X WO-WM Alt S—1—11—11—011.45 OM MACE I • - -El 0 9 9 w000 room - - wr . NONA,uk - -- -L.. - I EL. r , IPE- IWANNOWAR. inw.NRIN PL., .- PAW krOWN" • W 1511 NANO,. N RA,NAN I 0 a . POUR NLA! S WWII ROCA it S Maar N. A in NAND Isir, < I. It UllOre Noir 0 CAVA NEN.-NA ' E.- MI NW WC 55 5555 555.•'l , / ill i M 0 ' 111 GAP VANE N. NOR M: T"'"°'1719ArorAML7:ows*": 2.112../voln. "".''77-- I g : Il d , 'rf.:"'ANA ANNAN WNW=110=111111g, e I eI torcewa.LotaliOrl...<rucw.4. . RE ANEW,PUMP Wax 1 . 1 u - _ _Ilit „.... ._ . ;....: / lit LEI42 0 I ' I5047 1544 45455 0-fr r 0 g 40.-0.ACOMB TOMMIMOIS >. @ i .2. ,L „,..,1 ZONA E 4555,5,. 5 - ,., VICINITY YAP .....7 ---, 114 272m .11. ._. 1 32 in COM MI6 / ,. , 5 ‘1/4 1 -.tr. •• '3 1 r .._ , 1 -5_x__,, • 55/555.7 1/515.17 Si5w =. ............-. •••••• (--A I • wAs_ 1 irgri 7-11-WIRA Il C, r/555/55111•0511A-Tio .' 1 I - .-... ....' ....1/4 :7! C-.C1 / :m"....5•••• 1 ' II , , —x . • .) . 4 \..., , 71 .......7„..7._ _____ _ i P - _-6Z-"''''''./A--'-- •-''-- ._... 3 Dr:VISIONS 2 i 1 I ---...-• MICAP1101 1... I • 21-5( T I f A 11.11.•PLAY ow eese,mow en • ”—,e 1I i ... . -------1 1 ' 8 I r , .<yip 1.11PIR0 Mg FM Amer AN ' WM. ....No NI.• sw (, 5 ,......5 1 '+' Imtgamoli , , CREEIC DRIVE ,.,, ....,......1 • 1 MINN I Normia NM NW • ',. O. . . A I I ..-..... . I . </V.EANN/>. '\ ' 1.01 nil Ecurrlehrer ma} LIMIED AS CONEWNONN ALT 7 I ; , 1 1 I SHEET TITLE ',WC NONII• •-•"•/•=r•••--• 5k+EET NUMBER A.4 11.97"SCALE.I'.fir-o. pro.„,"- SITY VI Atl I war DOWN.. SI 146 MI OF 5/5..515. 1,061611105 r%PRIVI.F..11,re NATI.•Am,NSF 00 woraosuer come Twos Owl wwcw-N...A]uwaEr NorrES Is 51.1.19-IMP • ..._ . . Marvair 156 Seedling Drive Cordele, Georgia 31015 229-273-8058 Distance From Marvair Sound Data for the ComPac I and I I Air Conditioners (dBA) Unit (Fed) AVPA24ACA AVPA3OHPA ' AVPA36ACA AVPA42ACA AVPA48ACA AVPA6OACA AVPA72ACA 3 5 66 69 70 70 72 73 69 10 61 67 66 66 68 70 64 20 56 63 62 62 63 65 60 30 53 61 58 60 61 63 58 40 51 59 56 59 58 61 56 50 50 57 55 57 57 60 55 60 49 56 53 56 56 58 53 70 57 80 56 Notes: (1) Test Date: March 1-30, 2011 (2) Background Sound Level: 30 to 33 dBA A Division of AIRXCEL, Inc. 4/312014 City of Tigard.Oregon IIICity of Tigard, Oregony. r_ ,` !r 1 ,1Y 1lw!l IV,/. l ot,rnt,tYF:' .,, A V. �` �1. � o ` ,Y'1 .r l .4.0,.4.0, TIGACD "t tett to ca//tome- ' I - Planning , I.1 I' l I Mammon I LnyironmerLai Rem I wetlands I Habitat I St',,,,,,lands I Tree Grove', I Tree Permit£ I Annexations I Hutldaole Lands 12035 TSP I S.[6_' I 13835 SW HALL BLVD, TIGARD R-12 (PE)) III R<<_' OMARA sT -- s R-12 o o > o , 0 .-. Legend > B zoning u+ = • 30,000 Sq Ft Min Lot Size 20,000 Sq Pt Min Lot Size 0 C. .wf 10,000 Sq Ft Min Lot Size ��ss R-'+-5 - "` 7,500 Sq Ft Min Lot'Size L.% „C ' ; r 5,000 Sq Ft Min Lot Size i R 1 I- 3,050 Sq Ft Min Lot Size i— A M D O N A L D ST 1,480 Sq Pt Min Lot Size m ! -t"tAR '. 40 Units Per Acre Mixed Use Residential 1 R-7 fpDi Mixed Use Residential 2 M CONTACT US City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall BlvdTigard,OR 97223,503-639-4171 Man and Directions J Location and Hours ofOperatioo AFTER-HOURS CONTACT Public Works/Water 503-639-1554 Police Non-Emergency:503-629-0111 Questions,comments,suggestions?Fill out the feedback form https:/M w.tigardmaps.corn'mo6i_rrxltimap/indexcfm?fuseaction=planning.sunxrrary 1/1 Exhibit #4, Clean Water Services Analysis Cleaner -iter Services February 28, 2014 PTS 1001 SE WATER AVE STE 180 PORTLAND OR 97214 RE. CWS file 14-000401 Installation of Wireless Communication Facility (Tax map 2S102DD Tax lot 00901, 00900) Clean Water Services has received your Sensitive Area Certification for the above referenced site. District staff has reviewed the submitted materials including site conditions and the description of your project. Staff concurs that the above referenced project will not significantly impact the existing Sensitive Areas found near the site. In light of this result, this document will serve as your Service Provider letter as required by Resolution and Order 07-20, Section 3.02.1. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local, state, and federal law. This letter does NOT eliminate the need to protect Sensitive Areas if they are subsequently identified on your site. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (503) 681-3653. Sincerely, Amber Wierck Environmental Plan Review 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway • Hillsboro,Oregon 97123 Phone: (503)681-3600 • Fax: (503)681-3603 • cleanwaterservices.org Exhibit # 5 , Geotechnical Report Adapt Engineering 10725 SW Barbur Boulevard.Suite 200 Portland,Oregon 97219 4 Tel(503)892-2346 Fax(503)892-2348 www.adaptengr.com ADAPT October 24, 2013 REcEIVED AFS 1 0 2014 Adapt Project No. OR13-18481-GEO C17Y FgNNN / TIGARD AT&T Mobilityc/o %A /VG * f G Pacific Telecom Services, LLC 506 2nd Avenue, Suite 210 Seattle, Washington 98104 Attention: Mr. Zach Phillips Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation PD32 Hall Blvd. & McDonald 13835 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97224 Dear Mr. Phillips: Adapt Engineering (Adapt) is pleased to submit this report describing our recent geotechnical engineering evaluation for the PD32 Hall Blvd. & McDonald tower site. The purpose of our work was to interpret general surface and subsurface site conditions in order to provide recommendations for design and construction. Our scope of services consisted of a surface reconnaissance, a subsurface exploration, geotechnical analyses, and report preparation. It was authorized by Pacific Telecom Services, LLC (PTS)on behalf of AT&T Mobility (AT&T). We prepared this report in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices and the time we prepared it, for the exclusive use of PTS, AT&T and their agents, for specific application to this project. Use or reliance upon this report by a third party is at their own risk. Adapt does not make any representation or warranty, express or implied, to such other parties as to the accuracy or completeness of this report or the suitability of its use by such other parties for any purpose whatever, known or unknown, to Adapt. Adapt Engineering We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any questions, or if we can be of further assistance to you, please contact us at(503) 892-2346. Respectfully Submitted, Adapt Engineering r _ Robert Nystrom, R.G. Staff Geologist / a PRof�slo ditEGO • f7 EXPI• • rzMM. Jeanne M. Niemer, P.E., G.E. Senior Geotechnical Engineer Senior Reviewer Attachment A Figures Figure 1 Location/Topographic Map Figure 2 Site & Exploration Plan Attachment B Subsurface Exploration Logs AT&T Mobility clo PTS—PD32 Hall Blvd &McDonald October 24,2013 Adapt Project No. OR13-1848t-GEO + Adapt Engineering 10725 SW Barbur Boulevard,Suite 200 Portland,Oregon 97219 rTel(503)892-2346 Fax(503)892-2348 ADAPT www.adaptengr,com RECEIVE APR 102014 E.EKING AT&T Mobility do PTS Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation PD32 Hall Blvd. & McDonald Tower Site Tigard, Oregon 0813-18481 -GEO October 2013 Adapt Engineering PROJECT DESCRIPTION The property is located at 13835 SW Hall Boulevard in Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, as shown on the attached Location/Topographic Map, Figure 1. The proposed project will consist of constructing a new 100-foot tall monopole communications tower, associated equipment shelter, and a short new gravel driveway. SITE CONDITIONS Surface Conditions The proposed lease area is vacant, level, and covered with grasses. An existing gravel driveway provides partial access to the lease area. There was no standing water present in the lease area at the time of our site visit. Subsurface Conditions We explored the subsurface conditions at the project site on October 23, 2013. We drilled one boring near the proposed tower location (not staked), as shown on the attached Figure 2. We encountered approximately five feet of medium stiff silt mantling very loose and loose silty fine sand that extended to approximately 30 feet below ground surface (bgs). We encountered very soft/very loose silt and silty fine sand at approximately 30 feet bgs and soil became medium stiff/loose at approximately 35 feet bgs. We encountered medium dense silty fine sand, with varying amounts of silt at approximately 40 feet bgs. This material graded to dense sand to approximately 51.5 feet bgs, the maximum extent of our exploration. We encountered groundwater at approximately 20.5 feet bgs and saturated/wet soils from approximately 20.5 feet bgs to approximately 51.5 feet bgs. Based on our review of well logs in the vicinity, groundwater is likely to be encountered as high as five feet bgs. It may also fluctuate in response to changing precipitation patterns, off-site construction activities, and changes in site utilization. The existing and proposed site features, in relation to our exploration, are shown in the attached Site & Exploration Plan (Figure 2). Seismic Conditions Based on our analysis of subsurface exploration logs and a review of published geologic maps, we interpret the on-site soil conditions to correspond to Site Class D, as defined by Table 1613.5.2 of the 2009 International Building Code. Based on our analysis, up to about 12 inches of liquefaction settlement could occur in the upper 40 feet of soil, during a design level earthquake. CONCLUSIONS Based on our exploration and analyses, the site can be developed as proposed. Based on their consistency and the presence of groundwater, there is a significant risk of liquefaction of the loose sands located between about 5 and 40 feet bgs; therefore, the tower should be supported on a AT&T Mobility c;o PTS—PD32 Hall Blvd.&McDonald October 24,2013 Adapt Project No.OR13-18481-GEO page 4 Adapt Engineering drilled pier foundation that derives its support from the medium dense to dense sand that we encountered below 45 feet bgs. The foundation for the equipment pad can derive support from the upper medium stiff to stiff silt. Our specific recommendations for site preparation, equipment cabinet support, tower foundations, and structural fill are presented in the following sections. GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS Tower Drilled Pier Foundations End Bearing Capacities: For vertical compressive soil bearing capacity, we recommend using the unit end bearing capacity presented in Table 1 below. This allowable end bearing capacity includes a minimum safety factor of 1.5. We recommend that the drilled pier penetrate a minimum of five feet into the medium dense to dense sand that underlies the site at a depth of approximately 45 feet bgs. Table 1 Allowable End Bearing Capacity Depth (feet) Allowable Bearing Capacity Limiting Point Resistance (tsf) (tsf) >45 2.8 D/B 23.0 Notes: = the embedment depth (in feet) into the bearing layer. B = pier diameter(feet). Frictional Capacities: For frictional resistance along the shaft of the drilled piers, acting both downward and in uplift, we recommend using the allowable skin friction value listed in Table 2. We recommend that frictional resistance be neglected within the uppermost two feet below the ground surface. The allowable skin friction values presented includes a minimum safety factor of 1.5. Table 2 Allowable Skin Friction Capacities Depth (feet) Allowable Skin Friction (psf) 0-2 0 2-15 200 15-45 150 >45 450 Lateral Capacities: Drilled pier foundations for communication towers are typically rigid and act as a pole, which rotates around a fixed point at depth. Although more complex and detailed analysis is available, either the simplified passive earth pressure method or the subgrade reaction method AT&T Mobility C10 PTS-PD32 Hall Blvd. &McDonald October 24.2013 Adapt Project No.0R13-18481-GEO page 5 ( ) Adapt Engineering is typically used to determine the pier diameter and depth required to resist groundline reaction forces and moments. These methods are described below. Passive Earth Pressure Method: The passive earth pressure method is a simplified approach that is generally used to estimate an allowable lateral load capacity based on soil wedge failure theory. Although the lateral deflection associated with the soil wedge failure may be estimated, design lateral deflections using the passive earth pressure method should be considered approximate, due to the simplified nature of the method. According to the NAVFAC Design Manual 7.02 (1986), a lateral deflection equal to about 0.001 times the pier length would be required to mobilize the allowable passive pressure presented below; higher deflections would mobilize higher passive pressures. Our recommended passive earth pressures for the soil layers encountered at this site are presented in Table 3 and incorporate a safety factor of at least 1.5, which is commonly applied to transient or seismic loading conditions. These values are expressed as an equivalent fluid unit weight to reflect the linear increase with depth. They may be assumed to act over an area measuring two pier diameters wide by eight pier diameters deep. Table 3 Allowable Passive Earth Pressures Depth (feet) Allowable Passive Pressure (pcf) 0-2 0 2-15 250 15-45 150 >45 350 Subgrade Reaction Method: The subgrade reaction method is typically used to compute lateral design loads based on allowable lateral deflections. Using this method, the soil reaction pressure (p) on the face of the pier is related to the lateral displacement (y) of the pier by the horizontal subgrade modulus (kh); this relationship is expressed as p=khy. Because soil modulus values are based on small scale, beam load test data, and are usually reported as a vertical subgrade modulus (ky), they must be converted to horizontal subgrade modulus values representative for larger scale applications (such as large pier diameters) by means of various scaling factors, as discussed below. In addition to the scaling and loading orientation, the soil-pier interaction governing kh is also affected by the soil type. For cohesionless soils (sand, non-plastic silt) and soft cohesive soils (clay, cohesive silt), the horizontal subgrade modulus (kh) increases linearly with depth (z). This relationship is expressed as kh = nhz(1/B), where nh is the coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction and (1/B) is the scaling factor. For stiff or hard cohesive soils (clay, cohesive silts), the horizontal subgrade modulus (kh) is essentially the same as the vertical subgrade modulus (lc) and is considered constant with depth. AT&T Mobility c/o PTS-PD32 Hall Blvd. & McDonald October 24, 2013 Adapt Protect No.OR13 18489-GEO page 6 Adapt Engineering This relationship is expressed as kh=k„[1(ft)11.58], where [1(ft)/1.5B] is the scaling factor (B is expressed in feet). Our recommended values for the coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction (nh) and the vertical subgrade modulus (k„) for the soil layers encountered at this site are presented in Table 4 below. These values do not include a factor of safety since they model the relationship between contact pressure and displacement. Therefore, the structural engineer or monopole manufacturer should select an appropriate allowable displacement for design, based on the specific requirements of the communication equipment mounted on the tower. Table 4 - Recommended Horizontal Subgrade Reaction Values Depth Interval,(feet) nh (pci) k„ (pci) 0-2 0 0 2-15 6 N/A 15-45 4 N/A >45 30 N/A Coefficient of Horizontal kh=nh(z/B) kh=k„/(1.5B) Subgrade Reaction (pci) (Sand &Soft Clay) (Stiff Clay) Construction Considerations: We encountered groundwater at a depth of about 20 feet during our investigation; however, groundwater conditions may fluctuate, and may result in difficult drilling conditions if the hole is not cased. If groundwater is encountered during drilling, it may be necessary to pump accumulated groundwater prior to pier concrete placement. Alternatively, the use of bentonite slurry could be utilized to stabilize the drilled pier excavation. The foundation- drilling contractor should be prepared to case the excavation to prevent unanticipated caving and raveling of the pier shaft sidewall. The drilling contractor should be prepared to clean out the bottom of the pier excavation if loose soil is observed or suspected, with or without the presence of slurry or groundwater. As a minimum, we recommend that the drilling contractor have a cleanout bucket on site to remove loose soils and/or mud from the bottom of the pier. If groundwater is present and abundant within the pier hole, we recommend that the foundation concrete be tremied from the bottom of the hole to displace the water and minimize the risk of contaminating the concrete mix. The Drilled Shaft Manual published by the Federal Highway Administration recommends that concrete be placed by tremie methods if more than 3 inches of water has accumulated in the excavation. AT&T Mobility clo PTS-PD32 Hall Blvd.&McDonald October 24,2013 Adapt Project No.OR13-18481-GEO page 7 l Adapt Engineering Equipment Building or Cabinet Foundation We recommend that the thickened slab edges for the equipment building be designed as spread footings. Alternatively, the equipment support pad may be designed as a structural slab-on-grade with a uniform thickness and a reduced bearing pressure. In either case, we anticipate that the support pad bearing pressure will be relatively light. The following recommendations and comments are provided for purposes of equipment pad design and construction. Footing Dimensions: We recommend that the thickened edge of the slab be designed as a spread footing and be constructed to have a minimum width of 12 inches. For frost protection, the footings should penetrate at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent exterior grades or deeper if required by local building code. Bearing Pressure and Lateral Resistance: For thickened-edge pad footings bearing on the medium stiff silt or new structural fill placed over this material, we recommend a maximum allowable static soil bearing pressure of 2000 pounds per-square-foot (psf). The recommended bearing pressure can be increased by one-third to accommodate transient wind or seismic loads. For that portion of the foundation embedded more than one foot below the finished exterior subgrade elevation and confined by medium stiff silt or new structural fill, we recommend using an allowable base friction coefficient of 0.30 and an allowable passive earth pressure of 200 pounds per cubic foot (pcf), expressed as an equivalent fluid unit weight, for design. In order to develop these capacities, concrete must be poured neat in excavations, the adjacent grade must be level, and the static ground water must remain below the base of the footing throughout the year. Adjacent floor slabs, pavements, or the upper 12-inch depth of adjacent, unpaved areas should not be considered when calculating passive resistance. These lateral resistance values incorporate a minimum safety factor of 1.5. For the alternate equipment support pad design using a uniform thickness, structural slab-on- grade, we recommend a maximum allowable uniform floor slab load of 250 psf across the pad. Settlements: For thickened edge slabs designed and constructed as recommended, we estimate that total post-construction settlements bearing on properly prepared subgrades will be less than one inch. For a structural slab-on-grade equipment pad with a uniform thickness (without thickened edges), somewhat greater movements may be experienced. To limit settlements, we recommend that loose or soft fill soils or unsuitable native organic soils be overexcavated and replaced with structural fill. Any locally deeper zones of organics or soft soils encountered at the base of the overexcavation should be removed and replaced with structural fill. Because foundation stresses are transferred outward as well as downward into the bearing soils, all footing overexcavations should also extend horizontally outward from the footing edge a distance equal to the one half the overexcavation depth for the structural backfill. Therefore, an overexcavation that extends 2-feet below the footing base should also extend 1-foot outward in all AT&T Mobility c/a PTS—PD32 Hall Blvd. & McDonald October 24,2013 Adapt Project No.OR13-18481-GEO page 8 Adapt Engineering directions from the footing edges (a 2V:1H projected line from the bottom of the footing to the bottom of the fill prism). A representative from Adapt should observe any overexcavation and subsequent installation of structural fill and should observe the condition of footing subgrades before concrete is poured to verify that they have been adequately prepared. Final site grades should slope downward away from the structure so that runoff water will drain to suitable collection points, rather than ponding near the structure. We recommend that the area surrounding the structure be capped with concrete, asphalt, or compacted, low-permeability (silty) soils to reduce surface-water infiltration into the subsoils adjacent to/below the foundation. Access Driveway We recommend that the subgrade for any access roadway be prepared in accordance with the Site Preparation section of this report. For planning purposes, we anticipate that 6 to 12-inches of clean sand and gravel subbase material and a minimum 3-inches of crushed rock surfacing will be required to create a stable gravel roadway surface at this site. Adapt can provide additional subgrade stabilization or gravel road section recommendations based on observed field conditions at the time of construction. Seismic Design Parameters Based on our understanding of site conditions, and USGS published parameters for peak bedrock site acceleration coefficients at the site, we recommend the following parameters for seismic design. Seismic Design Parameters Application Base Shear Forces Site Class D Spectral Response Acceleration(Short Period),Ss 0.937 Spectral Response Acceleration(1-Second Period), S1 0.337 Site Coefficient, F. 1.125 Site Coefficient, F, 1.726 Design Spectral Response Acceleration(Short Period),Sns 0.703 Design Spectral Response Acceleration(1-Second Period), SD, 0.388 Liquefaction Potential High above 45 feet bgs AT&T Mobility d o PTS—PD32 Hall Blvd.&McDonald October 24,2013 Adapt Project No.OR13-18481-GEO page 9 Adapt Engineering For purposes of seismic site characterization, we extrapolated the soil conditions that we observed below the exploration termination depth, based on a review of geologic maps and our knowledge of regional geology. CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS Site Preparation Clearing and Stripping: After surface and near-surface water sources have been controlled, the construction areas should be cleared and stripped of organic matter and other deleterious materials. Silt fences, hay bales, buffer zones of natural growth, sedimentation ponds, and granular haul roads should be used as required to reduce sediment transport during construction to acceptable levels. Where present, existing topsoil should be stripped and removed from proposed development locations and for a five-foot-margin around such areas. Based on our explorations, the depth of stripping will be less than one foot, although greater stripping depths may be required if deleterious materials are encountered. Deleterious materials encountered during site preparation should be removed from the subgrade soils and hauled off site for disposal. Stripped material should be transported off site for disposal or stockpiled for use in landscaped areas. If stripping operations occur during wet weather, a generally greater stripping depth might be required in order to remove disturbed moisture-sensitive soils; therefore, stripping is best performed during a period of dry weather. Excavations: We anticipate that site grading will be minimal. Where required, temporary soil cuts associated with site excavations or regrading activities should be adequately sloped back to prevent sloughing and collapse, unless a shoring box or other suitable excavation side wall bracing is provided. It is the responsibility of the contractor to ensure that excavations are properly sloped or braced for worker safety protection, in accordance with OSHA safety guidelines. Structural Fill The following recommendations for structural fill are provided for design and construction purposes, if required. Materials: Structural fill includes any fill materials placed under footings, pavements, or driveways. Typical materials used for structural fill include: clean, well-graded sand and gravel; clean sand; crushed rock; controlled-density fill (CDF); lean-mix concrete; and various soil mixtures of silt, sand, and gravel. Recycled concrete, asphalt, and glass derived from pulverized parent materials may also be used as structural fill when mixed at 50 percent or less with soils. Use of the on-site soils as structural fill is also feasible. Placement and Compaction: When used as structural fill, the on-site soils should be placed in lifts with a maximum thickness of 8 inches and compacted to not less than 92 percent of the material's AT&T Mobility c/o PTS—PD32 Hall Blvd.&McDonald October 24,2013 Adapt Project No.OR13-18481-GEO page 10 Adapt. Engineering maximum dry density, as determined by ASTM D-1557. If the on-site soils cannot be properly moisture-conditioned, we recommend using imported granular material for structural fill. Imported granular structural fill should consist of angular pit or quarry run rock, crushed rock, or crushed gravel and sand that is fairly well graded between coarse and fine particle sizes. The fill should contain no organic matter or other deleterious materials, have a maximum particle size of one inch, and have less than 5 percent passing the U.S. No. 200 Sieve. In deep excavations, or where subgrade soils require stabilization, the particle size may be increased to four inches. The percentage of fines can be increased to 12 percent of the material passing the U.S. No. 200 Sieve if placed during dry weather and provided the fill material is moisture-conditioned, as necessary, for proper compaction. The material should be placed in lifts with a maximum uncompacted thickness of 12 inches and be compacted to not less than 95 percent of the maximum dry density, as determined by ASTM D-1557. During the wet season or when wet subgrade conditions exist, the initial lift thickness should be increased to 24 inches and should be compacted by rolling with a smooth-drum, nonvibratory roller. CDF and lean-mix concrete do not require special placement or compaction procedures. Regardless of location or material, all structural fill should be placed over firm, unyielding subgrade soils. If earthwork takes place during freezing conditions, we recommend that ail exposed subgrades be allowed to thaw and be recompacted prior to placing subsequent lifts of structural fill. CLOSURE We have prepared this report for use by the owner/developer and other members of the design and construction team for the proposed PD32 Hall Blvd. & McDonald tower site. The opinions and recommendations contained within this report are not intended to be, nor should they be, construed as a warranty of subsurface conditions, but are forwarded to assist in the planning and design process. We have made observations based on our explorations that indicate the soil conditions at only those specific locations and only to the depths penetrated. These observations do not necessarily reflect soil types, strata thickness, or water level variations that may exist in other locations. If subsurface conditions vary from those encountered in our site exploration, Adapt should be alerted to the change in conditions so that we may provide additional geotechnical recommendations, if necessary. The future performance and integrity of the improvements will depend largely on proper initial site preparation, drainage, and construction procedures. Observation by experienced geotechnical personnel should be considered an integral part of the construction process. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based on our understanding of the currently proposed project, as derived from written and verbal information supplied to us by PTS and AT&T. When the design has been finalized, we recommend that the design and specifications our firm review it to see that our recommendations have been interpreted and AT&T Mobility do PTS-PD32 Hall Blvd.&McDonald October 24,2013 Adapt Project No.OR13-18481-GEO page 11 Adapt Engineering implemented as intended. If design changes are made, we request that we be retained to review our conclusions and recommendations and to provide a written modification or verification. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. Within the limitations of scope, schedule, and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with the generally accepted practices in this area at the time this report was prepared. No warranty or other conditions, express or implied, should be understood, AT&T Mobility do PTS—PD32 Hail Blvd.&McDonald October 24,2013 Adapt Project No.OR13-18481-GEO page 12 Adapt Engineering ATTACHMENT A FIGURES AT&T Mobility do PTS-PD32 Hail Blvd.&McDonald Attachment A Adapt Project No.OR13-18481-GEO ' . - r • ,- a«:,Iu., f . ; `1't L.-.1, -- B ... .p..c,s • • .0''',• .-- . ••• f I 3 9 '',\ • Y, s 4 1. r „ if 4' - f..�• ` 1i•. c+ tni • .I. 1 81164 S 269. .. . .p . '• t. 1 s.. .r .. ITT- '. i. . it. .. ` i ` r✓• j ;� �� • HOST Bonita a --•••� f / --- Irl''-' �'�� . PROPERTY `•�. • .� .1 •-/0! r of s i '• `� 3, gw+r�rr rYA• - r7D l• 1 p' j `a� a Tv♦'a Jr N ,_ ' •11' e ;I r / ry .{.. —S�I • �, ♦°" W#t' swmi1F'00-k 57 • 11.q_ Q _ r / Gt _. -{ I.� In ., �Y "}—.'-'- •• I. , r i i , .'i,,,.. { ,s wi )/1" Q - ' •. - q ' x • • • yl L.. ,,,,, . i4 T7.1EPJ, J "., _ 's • =ii I 44 zl•j. _ `I� • • j'ille _j, .SW i Off, .HAM cam-- l70AD 1}•:v� _ r." — A e / High Sch f ,a 1, ,, I ` — ,` ` � r f .7) 1:4:-'11:::::a:"....,:v 4 eti ,..... . a,,L4.,'''' _ —� • - i J j1 r �i • ��~ l .Il 'Gf ever • - f RO 14 Durham VI ? . . • NORTH l• TUAj' .ATIN - ii - a rSiff- PL FFRS aa•'r•• 4TIN ... • c :it R00(0 - . ' . _ L PC !• *mono Cer . '' COUNT', 'v C UFS Ii �, li . ' F ,, fir' Base Map Courtesy of U.S.G.S.Topographic Map'Beaverton,Oreg"(1961, Photorevised 1984) Not to Scale FIGURE - 1 Location Map Adapt Engineering Location : PD32 Hall Blvd. & McDonald 10725 SW Barbur Blvd., Suite 200 13835 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97224 Portland, Oregon 97219 Client :AT&T Mobility c!o PTS Tel: (503) 892-2346 Fax: (503) 892-2348 Date : 10/24/13 Job# : OR13-18481-GEO 71:41`r 7.1-:=::-..-:;-. ..—.,7;3`,„...,-.1,e,,-, • ,„ ''.:.:1:. RESIDENCE .a- • . ^. ....--$. • _• . • 1. R •• I' . , I PROPOSED •vo r 1 I IP ,.:jr *" -4 • t = LEASE AREAr _,,4 •-iirr:, : i ti • PROPOSED I ACCESS ROAD TACAA ifilARN 3 . , .:-..," .41 *. , A CD . -, Le 0 ,..A. ("4 ,,.. F—• * r rig far row uor rip % v •-•-•. -IL • ,3' .. 0 a LEVEL • 1 4$,•11 % " "--;41.1 •.. — EXIS11ING"'16 ...._ , , . ' ^• ' °MEW AY —--.--..?' _, I " • BORING i a B-1 . - +0. 0. O. a. - 4 :s' 1\ * PROPOSED MONOPOLE I TOWER , , I - . . 4 _ RESIDENCE „, ..T.Googif- -. i..-4, - --.. 4..,,,•:..nelip. IS ...—, RESIDENCE..*Is RESIDENC: id I 45 4.71111. Ion ! 2 .191.151*a4rd 14 I'll t Art41,tan 4 NORTH NOT TO SCALE,Aerial Photo Provided by Google Earth Adapt Engineering FIGURE - 2 Site & Exploration Plan Location : PD32 Hall Blvd. & McDonald 10725 SW Barbur Blvd., Suite 200 13835 SW Hall Boulevard Portland, Oregon 97219 Tigard, Oregon 97224 Tel: (503) 892-2346 Fax: (503) 892-2348 Client :AT&T Mobility Go PTS Date : 10/24/13 Job# : 0R13-18481-GEO Adapt Engineering ATTACHMENT B SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG AT&T Mobility do PTS—PD32 Hall Blvd,&McDonald Attachment B Adapt Project No,OR13-18481-GEO i- apt Engineering BORING LOG 10725 SW Barbur Blvd., Suite 200 Portland, Oregon 97219 TEL:503.892.2346 FAX:503.892.2348 PROJECT : PD32 Hall Blvd. & McDonald 13835 SW Hall Boulevard Job Number: 0R13-18481-GEO goring No.: B-1 Tigard, Oregon 97224 El.,.t3en R.I.r.nc.: Wali coael.t.a. NA TESTING Groans Surf...Mershon: casing Elev.. rr-w OBSERVATIONS D. W � � G t J ;Z W ' Zp W E I(QC] 6 i h h 4a n g g# O mu a r Medium stiff, brown,moist, SILT(ML),fine roots 2 1.0 Slightly plastic 1 3 to 3 1.5 2 I 2 2 4 -5 - Loose,light brown,dry,silty fine SAND(SM)below 5' - - 2 - 3 2 - - 4 2 _4 5 5 _ , -110- 2 ' ' 5 3 4 -15 - Fine SAND(SM)below 15' - I 4 Less silt ,i_6 J.-6 4 20- Very loose and saturated below 20.5' t T-7 Groundwater,approximately 20.5" 1 tOf23 3 -25- Becomes loose below 25' 3 I$ 2 4 LEGEND _ I24nch O D,Split-Spoon Sample s Stark Water Leval at Drilling Grab Sample DAATTE I GeoPrnbe SL Stalk Water Level Type of Anatybcai Tasting Used DATE Page: X Sample not Recovered X Perched Groundwater NR Na Recovery ATO Al Time of Drigmy 1 of 2 Dnlling Start Date: 10/24/13 Drilling Completion Date: 10/24/13 Logged By'RN Aaapt Engineering BORING LOG 10725 SW Barbur Blvd., Suite 200 Portland, Oregon 97219 TEL:503,892.2348 FAX:503.892.2348 PROJECT : PD32 Hall Blvd. & McDonald 13835 SW Hall Boulevard Job Number: OR13-18481-GEO Boring No.: B-1 Tigard, Oregon 97224 i ll...no..e.r....c.= Will com.l.u. NA. TESTING Ground Sorac.elor.on Gun ekv.mm. n A. OBSERVATIONS w — E z .w a7�m z7 ia� zcc t4 31 libz cc, O -30- Soft/very loose,light brown,saturated, SILT(ML)and 1 9 1 Silt and silty fine sand interbedding fine SAND(SM) 0 to 45' 2 35- Becomes medium stiff/loose below 35' - - 0 1:10 2 4 i 40 Becomes stiff/medium dense below 40' 4 - 11 6 7 -45- Medium dense silty fine SAND(SM)below 45' IL 5 I - Wet,not saturated,some gray. 12 11 1.0 Pocket pen on silt layer within silty 10fine sand -50- T 4 Saturated,gray -, 8 ,4 Boring terminated at approximately 51.5 feet bgs. — - Groundwater encountered at approximately 20.5'bgs. -55- -- -- LEGEND 1 2-rn D.D.SW-Spoon Sample Z Static wafer Level at Dmmg Grae Sa.ncle DATE I l Gecprobe .m Stales Weler Level Type of Analytical Testing Used DATE Page' X Sam*not Recovered 3E Perched Groundwater NR No Recovery 2 of 2 ATO Al Time al Drllinp Drilling Start Date: 10/24/13 Drilling Completion Date: 10/24/13 Logged By RN Neighborhood Meeting and Notice Mal 1001 SE Water Ave.,Ste 180 Portland,OR 97214 (503)232-5213 NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING October 11, 2013 RE: New AT&T Wireless Communication Facility (PD32 Hall and McDonald) Dear Interested Party: On behalf of AT&T Mobility, PTS is proposing the installation of a new 100' tall monopole and associated communications equipment on the property located at 13835 SW Hall Blvd. This location has been selected to fill a coverage gap in the area. This proposal will be reviewed for approval by the City of Tigard through a Conditional Use Review and a Wireless Communication Facility Adjustment processes. Before applying for the required land use approvals PTS would like to provide neighbors with the opportunity to see what is being proposed and ask questions. This meeting will be hosted by Zach Phillips with PTS. You are invited to attend: When: Monday, October 28, 2013 Time: 6:00 PM -7:00 PM Where: Twality Middle School Library, 14650 SW 97th Ave. Please note that this will be an informal meeting on preliminary plans. The plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. We look forward to discussing this proposal with you. If you have any questions please call 503/232-5213 or email zphiillipsptswa.com. Sincerely, ,•:7 f r 1 ;l r r, t , J Zach Phillips Project Manager I cu 0 1:111111'1:11117111116 mil Fanri°�'� Area Notified 5�D0 Ft)tik 1 I URI an ---------j I Fenno�� � SreekPark Zack Phillips �ME PTS far AT&T�NM im 111111 , 2 1 a 9 1 im III s zooaa o OM • Em imord ri _ i . . rd. 111 WA, SI _ i 111111111111,11 LJI 11A—---:*— = _ MI �r w s o :•,.•:r sNeJect Site 11 MEW MI *4 MEM a,no en, ••••• q•••••4 =•� la •-•�•�•�•../ up, = �' rum " Property3 or the date n is valid MI �� _- for 3 months from the date printed on thisll 411 map. rdak �11164� ;/;lel_• A vow I- , -Ai iiii. Mill li ' 4111 L;11! �11� III� �, � �• iui- wia, Map Pnnled 1B-Sep-13 Inbtmu6w tlw on sm�rF for general lac nn mwv and unwld he„elVn.a eel,me 6av*loom•m Snwc.c w,r., an MI , ` O IMI `REEK CTDATA IS DERIVED FROM MUT TIPLE SOURCES THE tar OF TIGARD L R O S E Cl - IIII .. 111111111M1 MAKES NOt WARRANTY REPRESENTATION nR GUARANTEE AS TD TME iris CONTENT ACCURACY HEREIN THE mai TIGA COMPLETENESS OF THE 1 1111 IN EV DATA PROVIDED ER N.THE CITU OF ARD ASHALL(IJH IES NO •• �Ii� LIBARIIJTY FOR ANY ERRORS.OMISSIONSREGHDLCAT IFTAC WRAUSE IN IV+.E 111 INF QRMA7VON PROVIDED REGAROLEYS 6P HUMI CAUSED 11 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OEPARTMENr hill A Place fn tall Homc.. in �III -. �1", 8e City or Tigard .IIIIIMEM. Z r -,eARD att 13125 5W d,Oa Rii Blvd r.. MLN r ', . ..■■ I/1 warz.t...iimmt, 503 639-4171 wwwligara-OTgov 1111116axU -_--IIM�l♦e�e# � �r— AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING/PO,TING NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE IMPORTANT NOTICE: THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO MAIL THE CITY OF TIGARD A COPY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE THAT PERTAINS TO THIS AFFIDAVIT AT THE SAME TIME PROPERTY OWNERS ARE MAILED NOTICE,TO THE ADDRESS BELOW: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard,OR 97223-8189 IN ADDITION,THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT THIS AFFIDAVIT&COPIES OF ALL NOTICES AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION. MAILING: I, ZAA Ph[ ` I i c ,being duly sworn,depose and say that on the I 1 day of 6(.rI 0L-e fr , 20 /3 ,I caused to ha%c mailed tor of the persons on the attached list,a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) 13$3S 5v(Rail B��Ot / , a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelales plainly addressed to solid.pPe.rsons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at 1.0 O S iA'7I '�t) !rie 4,4164tiiia with postage prepaid thereon. l kt.-514,4 Signature (In the presence of a Notary Public) POSTING: 1, Cr r CoMmtr rd ,do afli� that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed land use application tf for A ,t OSM^ ( Mr,"ttl4r,f 7 ,r n i+�J' affectingn fa. an located at (state the approximate locations) IF no address(s)and all tax lot(s)currently registered) 1,3 ,5 f 14411 IS IVt and did on the day of pL4130(' ,'(] I rso}rally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a W V 1CSS L�t'^M +A W^ s '' �Lt 14'yland use application,and the time,date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. 111'14X( I sign was posted lr trrfxr ()(k b 1 ""L Q n ' Pa,"(I t�tr I v016‘ D [I- 0 'AMIE $(V Wh 0L, prmcicusS (e01 4xr-n itpV (State the location you posted notice on property) j Sigrla fore (In the present a 'otary Public) (THIS SECTION FORA STATE OF OREGON,NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF i`+"( County.of Irl O l 'nJn �t )ss. Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the " l-it`k day of PI A PC L[ ,20 ill . OFFICIAL SEAL �►�`'' . CATHERIANE MARIE SHERMANiLi � NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON .., CcMMISSION NO. 478010 NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 08,2017 My Commission Expires: ` l\c:uRp12r :'.tastcrsl Pre..lpplicauon Cunt-creme Packet\Affidavit of;flailing-Posting Neighborhood Mlccting-docs Updated 3/25/3113 Attendance Sign-in (City of Tigard requirement.) Name (First and Last) Phone/email (not required) (:,cie_ Y-t r .5703 - 145-31?,2-S rt 5e)1 /5765-) / 5135 et /5960 540 Oa Cr aor RiuSsatL 541 915 o 2_ srt sseti ia)of-( 922 cv-vr- 17 . i, K 7/ 6 s. (Ai. C. 'lOrY 1 1-f//r t14/c vk Sos_‘20_3eSY///ep s--p td,Fdlewae./ CAI Col Are(44 -.%;\ t_n - a ( -()t,0 3a S (-6`e 5 1031- -� - Community Meeting Notes On the evening of October 28 at the Twality Middle School Library, Zach Phillips conducted a community meeting to provide information and a discussion about the proposed wireless communication facility that New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC (commonly referred to as AT&T) would like to install at 13835 SW Hall Blvd. The primary issue was why AT&T needed to locate such a tall tower near homes. There was a general discussion about why AT&T needed the facility, how the location was selected, other locations that were excluded, and visual impacts. Also, some neighbors expressed heath concerns. The biggest issue was the visual impact of the tower. There were concerns over the height of the tower. It was explained that the type of signals from the proposed facility are diminished by trees and other tall obstructions and there are a lot of tall trees in the area. Some respondents had pictures of a monopine (cell tower that looks like a pine tree). They wanted to know if this was something AT&T could do. It was explained that zoning made that type of design a challenge in this location because antennas on monopines cannot be as tall as the monopine. Currently, the antennas are proposed at the height limit of the zone. A monopine would need to be taller than the zone allows for the same coverage as the monopole design. Neighbors wanted to know if this proposal would go to a hearing or if there was already a decision to build it. It was explained that this proposal was still in the design and permitting stage and that it would eventually got to a public hearing at the City of Tigard. The meeting started at 6 pm and concluded around 7:30 pm. Pre -Application Conference Notes Deeds STATE OF OREGON } County of Washington SS 1, Jerry p.Hereon, trer'tur of Assess- ment and Taxiton qhd E -Ofl4cio County Clerk for said ooifitl,d41Eeby Certify that the within frieVIDenantairiarrilft was receivod end recoud in boc�lc of r> U.s of said county; . ,....',..i ".,, .t I! . Cr1a^/on. U r eCtor of a*seelrt>♦rtt and'Taxation.Ex- Officio qty cleric Doc : 2001075129 Rrct-: 2H4177 32.00 07/30/2001 02: 57: 37pm WASHINGTON COUNTY 2001-075329 1 11111111111111111111 P 1 1 ... 3 et ,..............N•m•mormmirmimml 15 ' ir: i, i6. ' -. 1 T, 1,. 1. : .. 6 BARGAIN AND SALE DEED ` kKNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that TWILA HANSEN, hereinafter called Grantor, for the consideration hereinafter stated, does hereby grant, bargain. will , and convey unto CHARLES W. COLLING, hereinafter called Grantee, and unto Grantee's heirs, successors and assigns, all of her interest in the following desrribed real property situated in the County of Washington State of Oregon, desrribed as follows SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED HERETO AND SY REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. The true and actual Consideration for this transfer is in compliance with CII the terms of the Judgment entered in Washington Count,' Circuit Court, under case +- E number C99-0531CV. L' 3 T1s: :NST!•'" 1!:N! WILL. N' .' Ai., ,W 1!'F. e,F THF 4: ! 'y' _ OF ''F1:.1 'Al-:F LAN: isF LAW.' Ori.;" TO c ;IT IrN:.'. '•Fx'"F? •o , . ,. .. P" THE _E.h.° ,. A '1.-, , F: F: .F . 7:11: :h'F61.7-1 . '!.°F 'i .F:. .r '•. . F:.A'., , E l.zF.'!!et- 70 lL:h:!. 'H r ..'F:. •'F. . i i IR 6 :N WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed this instrument this , { day o f f''�?.r e c!` 4 , 2 0 0ll. i3 a :.- .c_L-.., 1,g-__4—... ..— CC z 8 STATE OF OREGON ) .,-----T- Ia H On AL SEAL ss ''~' Hk10M NELSON County of Gii ir3 ) . 4 �- J1',I COMMISSION NO 323013- - On this 07 ]'-4 day of /T�e... �i . 200i, p"=or g 4 me the above-named TWILA HANSEN and acknowledged t„c Lureyuing instrument to be her voluntary act and deed. N ary Public for Oregon y Commission Expires : /n ,7! ,.)c.'3 W -- It F.-:7r; q i .. ... . ..._ ..''T: . ... r.:. Is. r �— t. f71 , r.�.r. , ,r.J i.-.] ..—l. --f 7-,.7.-y '{f Nims, Pi Page 1 - HANSEN / COLLING BARGAIN AND SALE DEED i - - 47 P€g2a,ILd I •4r�^�°�,ge Q a,�, �'rs 1 6:'44115.."1` • (-ICOR TITLE INSURANCE ,�.. LEGAL DESCRIPTION Beginning at an iron pipe set in the East line of SW Edgewood Street, which iron pipe bears South 89° 18' East 20.0 feet from the Northwest corner of Lot 6, EDGE WOOD, in the County of Washington and State of Oregon; thence South 01° 30' West along the East line of SW Edgewood Street 54.18 feet to an iron pipe at the angle point; thence North 88° 20' West along the South line of said street 20.0 feet to a point on the West line of said Lot 6; thence South 01° 36' West along the West line 241.76 feet to a point which bears North 01° 36' East 45.4 feet from the Southwest corner of said Lot 6; thence South 89° 18' East, parallel to and 45.4 feet distant from the South line of said Lot 6, 40.2 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing South 89° 18' East a distance of 241.88 feet to an iron pipe; thence North 01° 00' West 275.16 feet, more or less, to a point on the North line of said Lot 6; thence North 89° 18' West along the North line of said Lot 6 to the Northeast corner of that tract conveyed by Deed to Delbert R. Hass, et ux, recorded in Book 766 page 565, Records of Washington County, Oregon; thence South 01° 30' West 150 feet to the Southeast corner of said Hass tract; thence North 89° 18' West 175 feet, more or less, to Northeast corner of that tract described as Parcel II in Deed to Natalie L. Bubenik, et al, recorded August 17, 1971 in Book 831 page 549, Records of Washington County, Oregon; thence South 01° 30' West 145 feet, more or less, to the South line of said Hass tract and the true point of beginning. 4 FM Of Ofoltrfri 1 Comb aiiolihi►plen I I.Js.-y. , ,le Anrss- nail and -,itr.- I.? _ IN •P LW bounty.It. rid Ifil 11 Iffilr:— 9616. 11 DhC Sn41SRn mmilmat I Rect.; 131141 2?s.0O 11111C� 10/17/1944 1)::O:GSRM 1 11 — K. yes._ f .,, L — t2 1- - ,, 1 — • ----- s ti `.''s —.;.ter -' ,t� •—__ E- - .— --- -- - raw — r :- 'F"-Fp: $f a frd •.-ixL ,, - Iiia.•Jam.r.Y1. r.�-- — itis- -—— — -- — - - MON TITLE INSIl14`ANC# S'TAT'JTOKY WARRA-YTY DEED TWtLA D.fl Npcn Cy a o,r,urzveys red'retreats la CHARLES W.COLLING,A SINGI.S WAN Grtmtet,the 1oi'uwin+ _ ; ds 7 bed reel prypcny'fisc of e>+rsrr bi i ices c cq' as apes ificsUy set Forth haeie aitnted Ia WASKING1 ON Cm:my,Oroi�. �— !-EE'LEGAL DIESCRIPTION'iTTACI-MD HERETO AND BY REPERf.NCE MADE A PART HMV 1 s.l �4'1-- --..41-s.a Thi'?LNSTRU N T WWILl.NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROP�7tTY DESCRIBED IN MIS INS7RUMEdT DI `r?'A N 4l'APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS Al u 7u,LLA nom. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING MISS 111111 MSREUME..;T.THE PERSON ACQUIRBWNT FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROF'P'-:'E.'TTY ORE COUNTY PUNNING D£F�Rr 1T TO VERIFY A/PROVED USES AND T. DETERMINEMem _ ANY LIMITS nI. LAWSUITS AGAINST E'.R'.IING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED MORS`91.01. The said- property Is frac from eocut is&ss u t S1.aTUTOR Y POWERS OF THE UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGF?CY.10GIiiS OF 11 1HE PUBLIC IN AND TO THAT PORTION LYING V!T►CN STREETS ROADS ANO is 4YAYS AS OF RECOSD. I EASEMENTS AS OF RECORD APIO ENCROACHMENT OF RETAINING WALL ON NORTH LOT LINE'. Pte_ I The true consideration for tis convey-mu is$114,066/V3 ('Here cowry with the regremmts of ORS 93-034} M Dared this 13TH dory of OCTOE ER _—19_ _ • 0 OfFICtAl.UAL tvau D. HAt9SFM I F.-6 10TARV wet -.i WAIL 30rtL�cfollwa 1 +M --wim 1/4..j .� Stare+T[xegon Coratt�of tiAS ii!lGSO?i S're of Oregon,Co.--.ty of The ming ynuument was ac�ovwtedyed before me this The foregoing iiszseno:sins adurowicdgcd before me this -- Aiii I3TB day of OCTOBER .19 94 by c+ay cf ,19 by3• T,ILA D M1iSEb1 Presdent sad—■ - — y a' 1t"sa `�� cor ration,oa i ehlf of tfie arpormoa E - --+rF Rotary Public for Oregon ! My xartmissaoo exy rm: 101 G7/98 of�>aat Nda7 Puhlic for Oregon -- Lw It irk :.fy corranisesaa cxpirec: 701Y KKK'-Ow'404 1 DQMtaI$t'.0 .1C LtII 4'r"16W1M:�r+Eviviri os.'T.T,1741 9vARRANTYDEE L irisc,:.y.• _ecved for Pecrrder'3 Lae N,i Gk431OR MLA D HAM x ttrASNtrrgTOM t�tU.TY µ ' GRANTEE: L?1A3t}FR'.CL)Lh.ING �_ -- 1 rita a 6.4.:s moisma 7,a0 m statsmans rued be a f ISLO__.1:1 O I .:..11A sew to the fullowssg Meets" s CHAR!_c'S W C1XVL :' FEE PWt} 8t'[ — • 13335 SW HALL.BOUIF"vAicD MARIO OREGON 97.23 — Escrow 1'o.622.197LI Idle No.W(22597•Rit { After recardrog room so: + 71ARLFS W.COLLINGl - I 1}3E,15 SW HALL BOULEVARD III T'tiecrT4NO 1.-"nTa2 93 . ' i ' --- I _--7-- __ iM addlla r t ,,,,.v,may _-3i' - _+.I y+�ki_ri.� _ - — _ r I +ate 11 4. . .1„.,,, 10 —�.. -' - M1 .l ,+ �`: Ai''' ,a...:w��••s�+�wrVWw•I.�`=��WW.* C 'srwwwa1wgi�wW'Al�s. ' l —� it tICGR TifLE INSURANCO _`` LEGAL DESCRIPTION of'It Lthington and StatL of � Being a of l.:rt 6,EDGEWOC D,it the City of T.�ard,County Cregc.11 Beginning at an i-on pike set in the E.ist lin.of Southwe!t Edppwaod Street, Eastwhich n One Z the -�- Northbeam $9` l8' East 20 feet fr.:s .he Northwest corner of said Lot $;running thence North line of said Lot 6,265 ftez..more or let..to the Nuttiest tomer of that certain tract of land described in contract to Gtritara ii. Young.et ua, reeorde3 June 19, 1957,it Deed Book 345,Page 176, Washington Counry Records sad the the point of beginning of the herein descnbed premises; thence South 01'00' West 275.16 feet,mor'or less,to the Southeast c-the herein mentioned Young Tract and a pout that bear North 91' 36' West a distance of 45 4 feet freta he South tine of seid Lot 6;running thence East parallel to and 45.5 feet distant from the South line of Lot 6 to the =-- Last line of said Lot 6, said point be:0g:n the relater of State Highway No.217; now SW Hall .„ Bc,utevard;thence North along the center of Highway No.217 275 fed, more or less,to a point on the`north Eine of said Lot 6 thence North ST .r Wd!?lore)the North litre of said Lot 6 to the _ point of beginning. R...p� iCEPTENG that Portion described in deed Ruth M.Yin Dienbeede,Fred k Vincent and Sue AM by thro.r'i its Department of Transportation, gh y Division, �! Vincent i�the Sia a of Go"t andel recorded August 10. 1949,Fee No.890)7072. aP i F ' I, s" r c' IQ 4;"..;, ._ 4 y..i . I liwoW -11M, • .. -... sem' .t. y - ,(r .yF�y41 a. __ tea" -.a..a.,... ... -• --= " : RYA' "PF — • • fr —� * ' } etit •',WWI.. _ s Lam. _ —. _ '_�___ PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES lig " City of Tigard TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Request GENERAL INFORMATION c FOR STAFF USE ONLY �/ Applicant: �4(11 , ("okt A-T I) Case No.: p7� ` 7©/3 - 00O-'t + q�7�y� ,rte-- Address: fr — �. ° N Phone:511706 lZ"U Fee: 7 I .1-11 ,I ' i Receipt No.: f ` �•5'OQ r I' City: / '{ Application Accepted By:C 4? Contact Person: rA 1 5 Phone: )O /, (0 e 2619Date: 2-1' I rr f DATE OF PRE-APP.: c�[i1 3Property Oer/Deed Holder(s): -((11.41/ ( l re SL 1;0 - 5 TIME OF PRE-APP.: 10'0 'A•m• • P1tE-APP.HELDWITH: {{ e ( 3 < ( Ij c h� Address: ��: i� (�7 J J � �•7��� �!�• Phone: 136.95'm tt<Q.6/23/2013 : ' gyp: - �j ^�/J /'f i:'\curpin\flume Lind use applications bluest App.doc CrAi")1 ag. Property Address/Location(s): 171 ? 35 S Li ..ii Old, Pt PA( 25102 0 10 I + V REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS �7 (Note: applications will not be accepted Tax Map&Tax Lot#(s): 2.S I 0 L-DD �!0 Q o I without the required submittal elements) Pre-Application Conf.Request Form Zoning: IK 7 y� 6 COPIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: Site Size: cal—Ft/4— 4 T4. VI Brief Description of the Proposal and any '35/ f5 1 site-specific questions/issues that you would PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION like to have staff research prior to the meeting. All of the information identified on this form are required to be submitted by VA Site Plan. The site plan must show the the applicant and received by the Planning Division a minimum of one(1)week proposed lots and/or building layouts drawn .r r t .` h. uli a .r.-...: a t i Cr•i • • irn to allow to scale. Also, show the location of the staff ample time to prepare for the meeting. subject property in relation to the nearest streets; and the locations of driveways on the A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 weeks of the subject property and across the street. Planning Division's receipt of the request for either Tuesday or Thursday (21 vicinity Map. mornings. Pre-application conferences are one (1) hour long and are typically held between the hours of 9:00-11:00 AM. j} T The Proposed Uses. PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDULED IN tom' opographic Information. Include Contour Lines if Possible. PERSON AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER Filing Fee !a'/� —_ I FROM 8:00-4:00/MONDAY-THURSDAY. r J IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO A 1 1 END THE PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE GROUP. City of Tigard j 13125 SVG' Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-718-2421 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 of 1 -rtes u 1001 SE Water Ave.,Ste 180 Portland,OR 97214 (503)708-9200 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Pre-application Conference for New 100' AT&T Monopole at 13835 SW Hall Blvd. (Parcel:2S102DD00901) AT&T would like to locate a new 100' monopole in the City of Tigard to provide wireless voice and data communication to people living and traveling through the area. The coverage in the area is spotty and there have been reports of lost calls. Below is a coverage map of the area currently. The arrow shows the proposed location of the monopole. Red is a strong signal and light blue is an extremely weak signal. Before LA x;•'a '' p ... . ,. ,.,. 4 r‘414;11: ° R :-.,,. _ u, !; lat,P s liis.• .4Z 1. /1 a r1 _i 1; :ren. • i `;i Following is a coverage map once the proposed site is on air. After IT 11 1 _ -- Lai - • V. "¢„ T AT&T has researched the area to find an existing support structure to locate a new communication facility to. An existing support structure with the required height and location to cover the area and meet the coverage objective has not been found. One of the options that has been reviewed is to replace a power pole with a taller one and attach antennas. This was not feasible because the power poles were much too short and could only be increased by an additional 15'. Modifying a light pole at Twality Middle School was also considered, but the school was not interested. Because collocating onto an existing structure is not possible, AT&T is proposing the new support tower. The new tower will be designed to accommodate at least two additional carriers. The proposed facility will improve the communication infrastructure in the area. Thank you for your time and consideration of this proposal. Sincerely, 5�ri Zach Phillips PTS 503.708.02001 zphillips a ptswa.com Attached: • Preliminary Drawings --_••10�� . at&t '�mobility at&t . \".............100, ,...............--" mobility, --r-ii PACIFIC TELECOM SERVICES,FINAL HAI 4L BI YD & MCDONAI 2. ZONING DRAWINGS 0823/13 PD32 13835 SW HALL BLVD PER REDS 7/13onTE TIGARD, OR 97224 PROJECT INFORMATION VICINITY MAP DRAWING INDEX LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROJECT DESCRIPTION' ° f a SHEET DESCRIPTION BEGINNING AT AN IRON PIPE SET IN THE EAST ZINE OF SW 0 AT&T PROPOSES TO CONSTRUCT AN UNMANNED TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY BY INSTALLING A NEW 11'-5 . 26.E-0" . T-1 TITLE SHEET EDGEWOOD STREET, WHICH IRON PIPE €OUIPMENT SHELTER AND A NEW 100'-0"ACL STEEL MONOPOLE WITH (12) 8'-0" PANEL ANTENNAS (4 PER SECTOR) SW°mare N g ''•••'-_ '. BEARS SOUTH 69' 18' EAST 20.0 FEET FROM THE WITHIN A NEW 55'-O" x 35'-0' FENCED CCMPOUNC. SIN Cherry Dr SV-1 SITE SURVEY (BY OTHER$) NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 6, EDGE WOOD. IN THE E "217.: A-1 SITE PLAY COUNT!OF WASHINGTON AND STATE OF OREGON; THENCE N SOUTH 010 30' WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SW A-2 PROPOSED COMPOUND PLAN EDGEW00D STREET 54.16 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE AT THE APPLICANT. PROPERTY OWNER: ANGLE POINT:THENCE NORTH 88' 20' WEST ALONG THE AT&T NOBILITY CHARLES W COILING 1A-] PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION SOUTH LINE OF SAID STREET 20.0 FEET TO A POINT ON 19801 SW 72ND AVENUE 13835 SW HALL BLVD Tech Lenl.Ir Dr A-4 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION THE WEST LINE CF SAID LOT 6:THENCE SOUTH 01' 3$' TIlALATIN, DR 97062 TIGARD OR 97223 WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE 241,76 FEET TO A POINT CH /'+� PH, ACT: 691-ON OLSEN PHONE (503) 436-4529 BEARS NORTH Or 36' EAST 45.4 FEET FROM THE [`�/J PH: (503) 691-5020 SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 8; THENCE SOUTH 69' PERMITTING; IB' EAST, PARALLEL TO AND 45.4 FEET DISTANT FROM THE AT&T CONSTRUCTION MANAGER; PACIFIC TELECOM SERNCES SITE SOUTH UNE OF SAID LOT 6, 40,2 FEET TO THE TRUE0 PANT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 69' 18'NANCY HORSTIAANN 1067 SW WATER AVEENUE, SUITE 180 PH: (503) 475-2832 PORTLAND OR 97214 W F., d'{Z, EAST A DISTANCE OF 211.86 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE„ / CONTACT: ZACH PHILLIPSnO 41. THENCE NORTH OI' 00' WEST 275.16 FEET. MORE OR 0 PH (503) 708-9200 :r LESS,TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 6, y C CODE INFORMATION- zPHILLIPSOPTSM AcoW SW xw G nMrd In 7+AHb THENCE NORTH 89' 18' WEST ALONG TIE NORTH LINE OF CO CS ZONING CLASSIFICATION:. R-7 Barb r^y SAIDTHAT• TRACT CONVEYED BY DEED TO DELBEIRT R. HASS, EE UX. N °n BUILDING CODE: 2009 OBC SITE ACQUISITION: RECORDED IN BOOK 766 PAGE 565, RECORDS OF2 0: PACIFIC TELECOM SERVICES SW Boma Rd WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON; THENCE SOUTH 01' 30' CONSTRUCTION TYPE: 118 1001 SW WATER AVEENUE, SUITE 160 WEST 150 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAIDp OCCUPANCY: U. S-2 PORTLAND, OR 97214 CONTACT- CRAIG COMMERFORD 'i.' �: HA55 TRACT; THENCE NORTH 89' 18' WEST 175 FEET, VI p . CRY OF TIGARD PH: (503) 577-4600 MORE OR LESS,TO NORTHEAST CORNER OF THAT TRACT o: CURRENT USE: RESIDENTIAL CCOMMERFORDOPTSWA-COM SW Fhne)3r°vh SI § DESCRIBED AS PARCEL It IN DEED TO NATALIE L. BUBENgK, M JURISDICTION' ET Al, RECORDED AUGUST 17, 1971 IN 00 PROPOSED USE: UNMANNED TELECOM FACILITY ? An S BOOK 831 PAGE 549. RECORDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, ~ CONSTRlJCT1O(,(+; m p OREGON; THENCE SOUTH Cl' 30° WEST 145 FEET, MORE 0 PACIFIC TELECOM SERVICES C a OR LESS,TO THE SOLIDI LINE OF SAID HASS TRACT AND 506 250 AVE, 2ND FLOOR .. THE TRUE POINT OF SEATTLE, WA 98056 'T' III SITE LOCATION: (BASED ON NAD 83): CONTACT: ZACHARY NESGODA UTrTUOE: 45' 25' 12.06' N PH: (206) 342-6383 A A g z% 3 ZNESCQOAOPTSW&COM ST S,(3 Ross St ii, LONGTUDE: 122' 46' 1.36' W TOP OF STRUCTURE ACI: 100' CONSTRUCTION; STN Lodr LnAi&T CONSTRUCTION MANAGER BASE OF STRUCTURE AMSL: 188' 5441 Kaman D Tar CONTACT: BRYAN MULLER _ PH; (503) 819-3268 __ _ DRIVING DIRECTIONS ABBREVIATIONS PARCEL NUMBER (Sl• START FROM AT&T REGIONAL OFFICE : A/C AIR CONDTRONING NOR$ HORIZONTAL PLYWD PLYWOOD 25102070090• AGI ABOVE GROUND LEVEL HR HOUR PROJ PROJECT I. HEAD SOUTHEAST ON SW 72ND AVE TOWARD SW SAGERT ST 489 FT AP'PROX APPROXIMATELY MT HEIGHT PROP PROPERTY 2. TAKE THE FIRST RIGHT ONTO SW SAGERT ST 0-4 MI HVAC HEATING PT PRESSURE TREATED POWER: 3. TAKE THE FIRST RIGHT ONTO SW MARTIN NAZZI AVE D.7 MI BLDG BUILDING VENTILATION RED REQUIRED _ I 4, TURN RIGHT ONTO SW BOONES FERRY RD 0.3 MI BUT BLOCKING MR CONDITIONING RM ROOM REVISIONS PGE 5. CONTINUE ONTO SW UPPER BOONES FERRY RD 1.0 MI SH' SHEET TELCO' 0.6 MI 01.0 CIDU NG 10 INSIDE DIAMETER SIM SIMILAR N0. LUTE nE5eR1P ON INITIAL6° TURN LEFT ONTO SW DURHAM RD FRONTI7. TURN RIGHT ONTO SW HALL BLVD `.I MI CUR CLEAR IN INCH SPEC SPECIFICATION A C/P/» ISSUED FOR Pia REVIEW ss DESTINATION WLL! ON THE LEFT COHG CONCRETE INFO INFORMATION SF SQUARE FOOT 0 01/2f/+s.ISSUED FOR 125 RLYME O 2*N CONST CONSTRUCTION INSUL INSULATION SS STAINLESS STEEL CONT CONTINUOUS INT INTERIOR STI. STEEL GENERAL INFORMATION; IBC INTERNATIONAL STRUCT STRUCTURAL - OBL DOUBLE BUILDING CODE STD STUD EARRING REQUIREMENTS ARE UNCHANGED, DN DIAMETER SUSP SUSPENDED —, 2. TRAFFIC IS UNAFFECTED_ DIAD DIAGONAL LBS POUNDS 'ON DOWN MAX MAXIMUM THRU THROUGH DEI DETAIL MECO MECHANICAL TNNG TINNED - _- DWG DRAWING MTL METH. TYP TYPICAL APPROVAL/SIGN OFF OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGSMR MANAGER RE _ EA EACH MGR MANAGER LINO UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ("` j� CONSULTANT GROUP SIGN OFF DATE SIGNATURE AT&T SIGN OFT DATE SIGNATURE €LEV ELEVATION MIN MINIMUM NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS II PROJECT TEAMEIEC ELECTRICAL MIK MISCELLANEOUS VERT VERTICAL LABELED AS CONSTRUCTION SET CONSTRUCTION MANAGER COMPLIANCE EO EDUAL RO ROUGH OPENING VIF VERIFY IN FIELD EQUIP EQUIPMENT PROJECT ARCHITECT PROJECT SURVEYOR PROJECT CONSULTANT' LANDLORD REPRESENTATIVE INTERCONNECT EXT EXTERIOR NA NOT APPLICABLE W/ WITH DUNCANSON COMPANY. INCPACIFIC TELECOM SERVICES - - NIC NOT IN CONTRACT w/o WITHOUT SHEET TITLE THOMAS R HOLLAND, ALAPROJECT MANAGER OPERATIONS FIN FINISH S NOT TO SCALE WP WATER PROOF TITLE SHEET PACIFIC TELECOM SERVICES, LLC 145 SW 155TH STREET, SURE 102 506 2ND AVENUE, SUITE 210 NTFLUOR FLDURESCENT 506 2ND AVENUE, SUITE 210 SEATTLE, WA 98166 SEATTLE, WA 98056 SITE ACQUISITION RF ENGINEER RR FLOOR DC ON CENTER SEATTLE. WA 98056 CONTACT' KEVIN WALKER CONTACT: KATIE KENNY - FT FOOT OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER CONTACT, AMANDA MARTIN PH: (206) 244-4141 PH: (205) 342-8352 ZONING RF MANAGER 1 --- PH: (206) 342-6399 KKENNEYOPTSWAGOM - CONSTRUCTION - GA - EMAIL AMARTINOPTSWA.COM SHEET NUMBER GAO/ GALVANIZED EE ENGINEER GC GENERAL CONTRACTOR Tr.,GRID GROUND REVIEWERS SHALL CLEARLY PLACE INITIALS ADJACENT TO EACH REDLINE NOTE AS DRAWINGS ARE BEING REVIEWED GYP BD GYPSUM WALL BOARD THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRICTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE ANY USE OR D.SCLCS:iRE OTHER THAN THAT 'ARIICH RELATES TO CARRIER SERVICES IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED ' Ip LATITUDE/LONGITUDE POSmON LEGEND I ;:D34CINATE DATA AT PP OPCSE0 MONOPOLE Li:"_A"1CN: SUBJECT BOUNDARY UNE 7� t I NAD 63 RIGHT-•0F-WAY CENTERUNE LAT- 45'25`12,08" N NAND 88 - atsi Your%ewtd.Delva4d.. LONG - 122'46'01.36" W ELEV.. 188.0 FEET - — — ---RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE IJ ADJACENT BOUNDARY UNE V BENCHMARK IS "DIME' "- • — - —SECTIONAL BREAKDOWN UNE - I I r= NGSV GPS250.COW0'S STATION. 11= OVERHEAD POWER uNE J( ELE . Lp BURIED POWER UNE C BURIED GAS LINE ST - - OVERHEAD TELEPHONE LINE I ELEVATION DERIVED USING GPS. ACCURACY uT BURIED TELEPHONE LINE MEETS OR EXCEEDS IA STANDARDS AS DEFINED ON THE FAA ASAC INFORMATION SHEET 91:003. v - BURIED WATER LINE PACIFIC TELECOM SERVICES, SS -- BURIED SANITARY SEWER LLC 1---30'--1NOTE542 S.cena 4,nu..i,sun.2,0 SO BURIED STORM DRAIN s.n0..�w4,se•e. TREETOP -- ,11,14:12001$A2-c°ao rer.12041 012-osis Et ' '�# A,} I 1) NC T1TLE RESEARCH PROVIDED AT 11415 TIME. - - —DITCH UNE/FLOW LINE �i'tY CALCULATED BOUNDARY MAY CHANGE UPON RECEIPTROCK RETAINING WALL ' ! VEGETATION UNE 7121 ruP �° 1 1 OF TITLE 2) FIELD wDRK CONDUCTED IN ,uI�LY 2013. 18.327± P8LEMP 8-'328i :7F20 CI 1 3) BASIS OF BEARING: OREGON STATE PLANE o EL-3371 - 828 VW CHAIN LINK FENCE 751 COORDINATE SYSTEM, NORTH ZONE (NAD/33). TREETOP �'Eq�W NgyO 4) UNDERGROUND UTIUTIES SHOWN HEREON, IF ANY, O- WOOD FENCE 0,315± / ,}{�''�� ✓ ../.15 0536 W WERE DELINEATED FROM SURFACE EVIDENCE AND/OR X BARBED WIRE/WIRE FENCE DEGOUGUS T6` / f / 5-5 J UTILITY COMPANY RECORDS. CRITICAL LOCATIONS O TRANSFORMER -9- FIRE HYDRANT ' C(UMP-48 / SHOULD BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO DESIGN AND T fTOP _ x / 1 0 CONSTRUCTION. L( LIGHT'STANDARC D4 GATE VALVE EL.249t �6 Or� �0>78 SIL 0502 G500 \ CD 5) FEMA OUTSIDE DESIGNATION. ZONE X (AREAS DETERMINED T) M POWER VAULT IH WATER METER / 1750 BE THE 0.2X ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN _ / ��' F _I PANEL 517 OF 850, FIRM MAP NUMBER 41027605170, ® UTILITY BOX f,X FIRE STAND PIPE �� . . ` EFFECTIVE DATE FEBRUARY 18, 2005. - 9'821 /1h OF78/ IO/ 186- ` `� f3 UTILITY POLE O CATCH BASIN, TYPE €-- POLE GUY WIRE ® CATCH BASIN. TYPE II LATITJDE/LONGITLIDE / / /74, 414 DST . I I III GAS VALVE a SIGN POSITION tid / 5sr I DUNCANSDN / 0502 0502 P OKE 3 Company. TREETOP 1 1 / / m TELEPHONE POLE (n C 7x. CENTER OF PROPOSED 1 / / )24 �„ d I L7 GAS METER MAIL BO fL=261± J 100' MONpPtx-E f' 62,3 / T j TELEPHONE VAULT o MAIL BO% lvl SW is is u...v.time 1n,• )T Seattle.RmArnXfnn 9066 .y Qp509 ` a TELEPHONE RISER 234,21-SPOT ELEVATION rm.: 2rM:441711 180 y / - Fa. NW`14.1I7J '�}4 050103 45. i NOTE: 182-Y I / �S0 I �} ALL ELEYATION5 SHOYIN ARE kBOVE MFAtJ SEA LEVEL E {� 5C9 184- y / - OSOJ'. 0� I I 2) ALL TOWER. TREE AND RAPPURTENANCE HEIGHTSBARE M SITE 186- - - - --- y 01 ABOVE GROUND LEVEL (AOL) AND ARE ACCURATE TO P032 A 3 FEET OR ± 1X OF TOTAL HEIGHT, WHICHEVER IS 1 55'%355ED , °� GREATER. HALL SVD AND 144 1 LEASE AREA S,` TREE LEGEND 5 III eilf D-ALL I I a .I % A•K - .. 1, \ b S !j \ I - - TOMO.OR 97224 i. 1008 NAIL - I 9 DECIDu0U5 TREE AL-ALDER -SURVEY CONTROL' OF50 r \ - APPROX. UTIU'TT POLE -- - -- ELEV.-189.1' II9.›.k _ - W,/TRaNSFORMER MP.MAPLE >T�ClU�NO MA{C/64T®R911 TO .a�ir�� y '�1T` 0y;2r .• + DS-DECIDUOUS Ex�varlulaFTlEca�4rlw►�Hee.7i v 7J 81 '6719 ]r.7 757±IRfE708 '� ` 1 I ALi, Z -TRUNK DIAMETER (IN) MA.MAORONA � A. T° �:,'� •• -x- - Ni v EL-2481 I Ifx. �_ OK.OAK ' PANT THOU TO Or al MY 111 VD LE19 CE05 7� r+ --,a; ® - V o_� men m, I HYDRANT FIRE TYPE CH-CHERRY T I ,. 0F09 DP' OP16 s Coal,OUQUI<W°outwM,MG 51.7 70.5 1 °7REETYIP p + - - EVERGREEN TREE CE-CEDAR RD. CREW: ,;AR/HD HYff �HEMLLOCI FIR PLD. BOOK: 294162 I _____TF1�16S3 \ m ' 1 `A}l TELEPHONEPROx SW POLE - FANNO CREEK DRIVE p Pt-PINE �7RAW1V BY: C.D - / sw 195.2 EVGEVERGREEN • r__ _ _ - HEIGHT AGL IF MEASURED JOB �4: 01792.1133• . . d Q. - — NOTE: GATE: 7/18/13 TREE DRIP LINES ARE NOT TO SCALE. TREE SYMBOLS REFERENCE TRUNK LOCATION ONLY. TRUNK DIAMETERS p V •Ti. A, ' z WERE APPRO%1MATED AT 3.5' TO 4' ABOVE GROUND LEVEL- RE Y�S�d'NS E n� ,I TREES SHOWN ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND OTHER - - - p I TREES AND VEGETATION MAY E%1ST. p<TE DESCRIPTION 6� .., - k IPS SITE INFORMATION )g d1 - TAX LOT NUMBER 731 020D00901 '` GRAPHIC SCALE SITE ADDRESS TIGARO,OR 972BLVD 24 a� w na , +..n.._. �4.... ...,,,,, �� �a.. ..�+.o ZONING R7 TOTAL LOT AREA TO BE DETERMINED PROJECT AREA 1,925 S F.( SN FUT 1 �,,N pJ ..... ,mob,,,,, '4"'4• — my... - 1 lurL- (4 Y 1 ''� t ... ..10.Y.T. LEGAL DESCRF 1ON "°' - _- REGISTERED SURVEY REFERENCE PROFESSIONALSURVEYOR NO TITLE RESEARCH PROVIDED AT THIS TIME Senn. ".-.rt D O F7►G I NO 3587, LANG SURVEYOR RECORD OF SURVEY NC 3987, RECORDS OP - y WASHINGTON COUNTY, OR. PREUMINARY -,` ID 2. PARTITION PLAT NO. 1995-108, RECORDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, OR. OREGON VI MAY 10, 2011 = SITE BOUNDARY DISCLAIMER JONATHAN MARLO BECKER 64870 ''� \ - THIS PLAN DOES NOT REPRESENT A BOUNDARY EA AT /4\ w�< -J� h ARE DE. SUBJECT AND ADJACENT PROPERTY USES RENEWS: 12/31/ GJ1sE f\1 f.�, CORRESPONDS WITH ITEM NUMBER fN 'SCHEDULE B' /V '-FPLC y` \\\`f, '!I RECORD INFORMATION. EVIDENCE AND " OF TITLE REPORT. 40 THE FOLLOWING EASEMENTS FROM THE REFERENCED 'FILE REPORT CONTAIN SUFFICIENT - SHEET TITLE INFORMATION TO BE DEPICTED ON THE PLAN OIFIER EASEMENTS OR ENCUMBRANCES, IF SW M SDONALD CAUTION! EXISTING Bf1E SURVEYANY, MAY AFFECT THE PROPERTY, BUT LACK SUFFICIENT INFORMATION TO BE SHOWN. ANO TITLE RESEARCH PROVIDED AT THIS TIME. UNDERGROUND ES E%OST ITHE AREA AND 8EC 2,TWF 2 8,RING I W,y.4 KRUSE WY. UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN MAY BE INCOMPLETE STATE LAW REQUIRESES THAT THAT CONTRAA CTOR CONTACT THE VICINITY MAP ONE-CALL UTILITY LOCATE SERVICE AT LEAST 48 SHEET NUMBER SW BONITA RD >r aF HOURS BEFORE STARTING ANY CONSTRUCTOR.m ' 800-424-5555 V1 - NOT -C '.ALE - 1- ', 1 y f ...., at&t LEGEND mobility —• SUBJECT BOUNDARY LINE —- -—- - RIGHT-CF-WAY CENTE�:i-. -- - -__ - _-- - - 1 - B-- RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE i SW REGINA LANE - ADJACENT BOUNDARY UNE SECTK�NAL BREAKDOWN UNE «o ��- OVERHEAD POWER UNE BURIED PGWER UNE F BURIED GAS UNE Lal aRr N-111OVERHEAD TELEPHONE UNE PACIFIC TELECOM SERVICES, ' BURIED TELEPHONE UNE LLC V) I25162DOD16fl0 251020DO5T00 25102DD05800 _2510 5550 I-Et W—A—A—A BURIED WATER UNE 0 `—SS ss SS— BURIED SANITARY SEWER 0 —NA SA SO-- BURIED STORM DRAIN DITCH UNE/FLOW UNE ROCK RETAINING WALL CD — W VEGETATION LINE —x—xx—x—x— CHAIN LINK FENCE r___________ _ - PROPERTY'UN€ _ -I ❑ 0 0 WOOD FENCE - . _ .. _. _ —.—x—x—x--x BARBED AIRE/WIRE FENCE a TRANSFORMER -9- FIRE HYDRANT � g LGHT STANDARD X GATE VALVE IL-1 POWER VAULT LE WATER METER CC ® UTILITY BOX 0 FIRE STAND PIPE wE _ Y' UTILITY POLE 0 CATCH BASIN, TYPE I Ji -J -i !— POLE Cum WIRE CATCH BASIN, TYPE II I t � IS CAS VALVE b SIGN z CO I�E3 GAS METER a BOLLARD y J] I f ! TELEPHONE VAULT o MAIL BOX APR s Irc 4 A TELEPHONE RISER 231.21 SPOT ELEVATION 251020000902 o A-A- 2 F A I -- NOTE.N !!!�..��� (n ALL AT&T ANTENNA MOUNTING HARDWARE, ! MONOPOLE, EQUIPMENT AND FENCING TO BE PAINTED FOREST GREEN EC o1, Q I W ` oW PROPERTY LINE I > q APN O • 1251020200900 N ,.J J O1 J ; �) DC L J7 a II EXISTING PROPOSED AT&T 20`-D'WIDE Q (-V'J� et TREES GRAVEL ORM TO KET FIRE I DEPARENT REWIRE/LENTS 201020060901 /� URILIZING FASTING GRAVEL ORTAWAY I „'n., Ca APR TM 00 y APN INI VICTY MAP F 25102000090.3 ZOHINC E-- //E)fISTINfl "1 'ti I R-T GRASS ilk AREA I / 4 0-1 l 'L ^_ EXISTING // , GRAVEL `—EXISTING \L iJ DRNEWAY BUiLDBNG� q"'"^03I. 14,.., - 1 SITE 'I L x - x � x Illialli‘i iiiimilinni- - , .._., ,_.A._,._,,,______„_=•.___ % PRDPERn _ �..+ �' LNE �� TREES ...._..__ ___., MA A....... ----_1.0k,21-__--.--.=cte—. -9- — APH I - � X X i— / — =— cF%US' € REVISIONS 2S 10200060601 , x ' .t C� Np. DATE DESCRIPTION 'N AL 125,02000.5900. 1 / APN I! ^ S �i.Li SSI FIR rzo t 2s,o2DDooa69 1_, I 2910 006611 2s16ao woeoa �� CREEK SW �DRfpE "6 i EXISTING �' PROPOSED AT&T SITE // BUILDING _ B[S NG - !j BUILDING? - . Lf EXISTING /// �� " / NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS �/ LABELED AS CONSTRUCTION SET I � SHEET TITLE SITE PLAN TRUE NORTH SHEET NUMBER MwM Y M anul.1.h.Y...q tit„...... 2x'.1 r SCALE, I' . SO'-0' y - - C�-1� f� i} I A...1 11'.t T` SCALE: I" . 6p'_fl" .10 1 - 30' J�[L.1 L'1 I THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO CARRIER SERVICES IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED 1I CI 0. ;r . NOTE: 4110 ..�. afi8tALL AT&T ANTENNA MOUNTING O T HARDWARE, - MONOPOLE AND EQUIPMENT TO BE PAINTED FOREST GREEN � T031l14y- /PROPOSED AT&T 20'-0'WOE GRAVEL ACCESS DRT,IE� S yN. 21'-6' PROPOSED AT&T FENCED COMPOUND + + S'-6" 3'-O- PACIFIC TELECOM SERVICES, / \ PROPOSED AT&T((2) B'-0• LLC - CFWN LBRC ACCE S GATES / + X k -- x - / PROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCE*TMx — % '. x ' k --- x — >, __ y — y. FOREST GREEN PRIVACY SLATS — X — X - 1( — x — x — PROPOSED ATa 'PANEL y ANTENNAS (4&PER•�SECTOR. 12 TOTAL) x k k s — % x k ix — x `x N. (' PROPOSED AT&T MAY H-FRAME ` _ H — n 1=1E61 PROPOSED AT&T RRH'S _ ''''''''''"'"'N.. \\ 4 --� I. _ + MOUNTED BEHIND ANTENNAS - PROPOSED AT&T PLATFORM MOUNT PER SECTOR. 12 TOTAL) - Ix y , PROPOSED AT&T 100 \ -0•STEEL '� Q d 0l '' .-�� MONOPOLE(MOTHERS) PROPOSED BOXAT&T TELCO MI Pt , 8' UTILITY EASEMENT) x \ I *40_ , AT&T 4) SURGSUPPRESSION UWIS ED I ^. — — I ir/ . AT AN1E)+R1A LEVELx � �n�,� �u PROPOSED AT&T GPS ANTENNA 10 ` + �•711146a1 i/ \ `rPROPOSED AT&T ICE BRIDGE /PROPOSED AT&T p N' I14h I - Iw 1 AE? _41r GRAVEL COMPOUND x �. `, 401\ , PROPOSED AT&T SHELTER 1 ` U SSs\s h'F " e1Iy G ..\,, STOOP mN 4FITURE I , I \ N N- /FUTURE OTHER CARRIER JLEASE AREA I y �E. I 1 I y w) 0 I I 1 111 PROPOSED AT&T-Crx 1 1 I - EOUpME)Jf 2F+IIELTER n Imo( ' I I -- (R7 DTrEIa) I' T IIx * I�+�1 —JI - - I I IP REVISIONS P - NO. DATE DESCRTION INITIAL V A 00/V/I3 ISSUED FDR P20 REVIEW' SS IC WW1 SSUED F4N F2D REvICR CBM k % '_ k — k — % k % — X — k — k X — x — X x k — N X -- k kk — x — X 1( — K — % — % ~ k — k X X — X — k ` ... X % X — k ' k - - - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS LABELED AS CONSTRUCTION SET - 26'-O• PROPOSED AT&T EOU'U EN7 SrIEL7ER _ 4'-0• SHEET TITLE PROPOSED COMPOUND PLAN TRUE NORTH SHEET NUMBER MMS a ..W..a... A';n wreal. ".36 E 4 - SCALE: 7/8- m 1PROPOSED COMPOUND PLAN I,„%,2SOLE: /16, . 1.-0z i D z 1,HE INFORAATION CONTANED IN THIS SET GF CONSTRUCTON DOCLMENTS IS PROPRIETARY By NATI,RE. ANY „SE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN HAT AHOOH RELATES TO CARRIER SERVICES .S STRICTLY P'ROAIBITET - - - - - 1 " ,..TE PROPOSE)AT&T RR/I'S -PROPOSED AT&T(4) SURGE ALL AT&T ANTEMWI MOIAiTXNC HARDWARE. MOUNTED WIND ANTENNAS SUPPRESSION EMITS MOUNTED l&j VuNTE O GREEN oNoPeltE AND EQUIPMENT TO RE (♦ PER SECTOR, 12 TauU— AT ANTE)wAA. ` a 1 1 PROPOSED AT&T PLATFORM UOI,AT ✓ moblllry ,1 _.PROPOSED AT&T 8'-D' PAH L 1 ANIEMH\S {4 PFR SEC EOR. ,2 Tow I g I= �� q [ r[I ...A ...- Ole .[1.1 I n4--�- PACEi1C TELECOM SERVICES. 1 IL � 1 I 1== 1 Irvruper Eli CARR DI ANTENNA.ARRAY I- ._J LJ U LJ i I 1 t- I - - --PROPOSED AT&T ,GG'-O`STEEL / \ MONOPOLE(ET OWNS) ,/-,, �I\ 4 LJ � � N.N. f \ Ciii PROPOSED FUTURE CARRIER t / ` r �� MYCROWAYE ANTENNA ARRAY f '� — �— _ C `< "'!`� U -21 q i fsi _ a rm PROPOSED AreCOAA RUNS _V G N Q 1 IS 888 WTTT�N PROPOSEF MONOAOIL 1 CCIr A--.1 i. PROPOSED AT&T LCE BRIDGE - - - PROPOSED AT&T „'-S• . 26-0• _ REVISIONS EQUIPMENT SHELTER (ETT OTHERS) roc"_ oC3r't�IrgN _sow. T PROPOSED AT&T (2) k'-0` . . P- c.,a PEI wire a PROPOSED AT&T CPS ANTETiNA \\:\ CRAM L&IN AGCS GATE PROPOSED TATkG�+ PRNACT FENCEN LPN SLATS -PROPOSED AT&T71 i UTILITY 1RI /-- AME i F / r T E I r I 'r, // i NoT FOR CS7NSTRCTION UNLESS �- r4`� LAtiEL.ED AS CANSTAUCfiON SET _ ',rte. - T'� ^` SHEET TITLE 1 wpm=WWI EMMA .11M i • �`" I Ii # \ '1 t� �, i 3 G .-0 AGL SHEET NUMBED 1! 24`.76•SCALE: !/,6• m ,'-O' - - - - - . A_ 3 „.,r srxE: /u`- 9'-0 4 a I'I��`f'�`�[11 NORTHELCV,q f L`\ THE IHFORRATION COICANE.D IN THIS SET OT "OHSTP-CT,:, :O'uuFN'S is P:ODR rag. a+ NATURE ANY USE CP LYSCLOSL E OTHER TNA'. TWAT RM:H RELATES TO CARRIER SERVICES IS STRICTLY PROMOTED - - - - I • - -- rPROPOSED AT&T (4) SLIM - - - „ SUPT TION LMRIS MOUNTED NONOPOIE EAUPMtNT TO BE p� C AT ANTENNA LE . �_ /. —PROPOS@ AT&T PLATFORM IgVIIT %-..--_.f:____, � PROPOSED AT&T RRN'S �^y R PAINTED FOREST GREEN MOUNTED BEHIND AIiIETIVAS �A�`A:.1il -- _- (4 PER SECTOR. 12 TOTAL)-----_________- --__•."---- mobility ...Z ------ 4-CVIL-4'--.-ZIA PROPOSED AT&T B'-C"PANEL ANTENNAS (4 PM SECTOR. 12 TOTAL) - - — - rte PROPOSED FUTURE CARRIER A TETAM ARRAY n n ', PACIFIC TELECOM SERVICES, LLC Idium=1 bt=i 16r ' 41 0 n n n f- A '- 1r 1 1- 1 = 1 1izi:. 1:. 1 u4 PROPOSED FUTURE CARR MICRO*IAYE ANTENNA ARRA I , — \ 1 1\L. J / Z S.' 0 r 1 \'` --I I N Iii cv 11 A g d r PROPOSED AT&T 160'-0"STEELOS f MONOPOLE(BY OTHERS) -. - � C- PROPOSED AT&T COWL RUNS ,!# T *nes PROPOSED MONOPOLE— -- - - �j a'n0 4 IS CCr-3] 0 o CO PROPOSED AT&T GPS ANTENNA- T i i PROPOSED AT&T ICE BIUDOE • REVISIONS nAft DesomPlrm ArTiN • WPM,E5K0 TOA aS MIN, SS O araPS KS1.YD FOR FED RENEW DIMS PROPOSED.AT&T 11'=5". 26'-0' EMINENT SI#lT€R (dr OTT(RS) - \\\\\ \\\ ,----PROPOSED AT&T - // IMT UTILITY N-FRAME . / PROPOSED AT&T CN UNIT - '1 A / PRNACY SiA'15FENCE IT, FOREST CRE1D1 T --. / / -- -. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS ,111111.1- /, LABELED AS CONSTRUCTION SET - I i- - 1 SHEET TITL • ---.4 _ I .-.- ,- - r • R10POSE➢FAST f1E4ATEIN "-}...,�..�_ j. J , R -- SHEET NUMBER ' --a ACL 2.�-Or=SCALE 3/16. . 1'-0 PROPOSED EAST ELEWATI�N J A4 _ 11".17"SCALL 3/32- . 1'-0" 14' THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCT'ON DOCoMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTTER THAN THAT w111CN RELATES TO CAREER SPACES IS :.TRICTLY PROHIBITED -- - Frontl DSTS ;L t> 6.))J41, Subject: PRE2013-00031 - AT&T Monopole Pre-application Conference Location: CR 1 Permit Center Start: Tue 9/17/2013 10:00 AM End: Tue 9/17/2013 11:00 AM Recurrence: Weekly Recurrence Pattern: every Tuesday and Thursday from 10:00 AM to 11:00 AM Meeting Status: Meeting organizer Organizer: -Pre-Apps_CD_Meetings Required Attendees: Kenny Asher; Tim Lehrbach; Albert Shields; Mike McCarthy; Mike White;John Wolff (john.wolff@TVFR.com) Resources: CR - 1 Permit Center 1 CITY OF TIGARD RECEIPT A = 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard OR 97223 503.639.4171 TIGARD Receipt Number: 192908 - 08/29/2013 CASE NO. FEE DESCRIPTION REVENUE ACCOUNT NUMBER PAID PRE2013-00031 Pre-Application Conference-LRP 100-0000-43117 $84.00 PRE2013-00031 Pre-Application Conference 100-0000-43116 $567.00 Tota l: $651.00 PAYMENT METHOD CHECK# CC AUTH.CODE ACCT ID CASHIER ID RECEIPT DATE RECEIPT AMT Check 23856 GPAGENSTECHE 08/29/2013 $651.00 Payor: Pacific Telecom Services LLC Total Payments: $651.00 Balance Due: $0.00 Page 1 of 1 w CITY TIGARD IGARD PRE2013-00031 AT&T MONOPOLE (Pre Application Meeting Notes arc Valid for Six (, l lontlts) T I GARD PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: September 17,2013 STAFF AT PRE-APP.: John Floyd,Mike McCarthy -F _ ,_' N©N-RESIDENTIAL pAPPLICANT: Charles Collins AGENT: Zach. ( s PhiliP AT&'I) Phone: 503-936-4529 Phone: (503) 7Q8-92(X) PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOC.1'I'ION: 13835 SW Hall Blvd TAN MAP(S)/LOT#(S): 2S102D000901 _ NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: Conditional Use Permit to erect a tower within a residential it tlh'; and a Type II Adjustment to reduce setback from the propertylinc _ PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: I,rection of new 100'monopole COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Lowe Density Residential ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: R-4.5 Low Density Residential ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18. 510) MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 7.500 sq. ft. Average Min. lot width: 50 ft. Max. building height: 30 ft. MAXIMU\I SITE COVERAGE: — Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area:—%. Setbacks: Front 20 ft. Side 5 ft. Rear 15 ft. Corner 15 ft. from street GARAGES: 20 ft. 10 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) THE APPLICANT SI TALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, INTERESTED PARTIES, ANI) THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING IVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. * NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. Z NARRATIVE (Refer to Code Chapter 18.390) The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. C1'IY OF'I`I( .1RD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 NI sN Residential \ppkcan n/Planning I)n nn.nSectroin IMPACT STUDY (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050) As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system,the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. I ACCESS (Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.765) Minimum number of accesses:. 1 Minimum access width:fi. Minimum pavement width: . All driveways and parking areas,except for some fleet storage parking areas,must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: ft. n WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.705.030) WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM TLIE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIR.' , ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. n SPECIAL SETBACKS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.730) STREETS: feet from the centerline of • LOWER INTENSITY ZON 1.5: feet, along the site's boundary. :- FLAG LOT: 10-FOOTSIDI YARD SETBACK. ❑ SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS (Refer to Code Section 18.730.020.13.) BUILDING HEIGI IT EXCEPTIONS - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: ► A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; s All actual building setbacks will be at least half(1/2) of the building's height; and P. The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. ❑ BUFFERING AND SCREENING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.745) In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSL: NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACI"S between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. 'file required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. The ESTIh1:•�T D RLE- WIRED BUFFER\;'IDTIIS applicable to your proposal area are: n/a feet along north boundary. feet along east boundary. n a feet along south boundary. n/a feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION,SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG:N CITY()F TIGARD Pre-application Con ferencc\,yic` Page 2 of 8 1�,11ti itc rdcni,.el i�,hl.t n.+t i'L+,ming,DI,i,i.+n'ccfi..fl • (11 SCREENING: SPECIAL PROVISIONS- 18.745.050E Screening and landscaping of parking;and loading areas is required per specifications in section 17.745.050E (1). In no cases shall nonconforming screening of parking and loading areas be permitted to become any less conforming. In addition, screening of service facilities and refuse areas also applies to all development with the exception of one and two family dwellings. // LANDSCAPING (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745 & 18.765) SIREE'I TREES SHALL BE REQUIRED AS PART OF THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR A CONDITIONAL USE (TYPE III), DO\VN'IO\\N DESIGN REVIEW (TYPE II & III), MINOR LAND PARTITION (TYPE II), PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (TYPE III), SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (TYPE II), AND SUBDIVISION (TYPE II & III). The minimum number of required street trees shall be determined by dividing the linear amount of street frontage within or adjacent to the site (in feet) by 40 feet (if the number is a fraction, round to the nearest whole number). The trees shall be placed within the public right-of-way whenever possible but no more than six (6) feet from the right-of-way boundary. Street trees shall be planted according to Section 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual and adequate soil volumes shall be provided in accordance with Section 12 of the Urban Forestry Manual. Existing trees may be used to meet the street standards. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. PARKING LOT TREES ARE REQUIRED AS PART OF THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR A CONDITIONAL USE (TYPE III), DOWNTOWN DESIGN REVIEW (TYPE II & III), PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (TYPE III), AND SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (TYPE II)All parking areas, including parking spaces and aisles, shall be required to achieve at least 30% tree canopy cover at maturity directly above the parking area in accordance with Section 13 of the Urban Forestry Manual. [] RECYCLING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.755) Applicant should CONTACT FRANCIIISI: I I.1L I,ER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Pride Disposal can be reached at(503) 625-6177. /1 PARKING (Refer to Code Section 18.765.040) REQUIRED parking for this type of use: None Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s):. NO MORE THAN 50%OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: r Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet,6 inches x 18 feet,6 inches. ✓ Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet,6 inches x 16 feet,6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3)feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. I IANDICAPPED PARKING: ✓ 111 parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions,is mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. ▪ BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL, AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMEN'T'S. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. CITY(DF TIGARDD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 \C 1\.}LrsJcm nal lir uc tin 1%11'1'nli)4 17111,1,11 eetxm • LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.765.080) 1°;vcn CO\1\IERCIAI. OR INDUSIRIAI. BUILDING IN EXCESS 01; 10,0W SQUARE FEET shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. ❑ BICYCLE RACKS (Refer to Code Section 18.765) BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MUL1I-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUS-110AL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. REQUIRED bicycle racks for this type of use:., SENSITIVE LANDS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.775) The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVLLOPMENT TO AREAS \\ITI-IIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPI..\IN, NA.I.URAL DRAINAGEWAYS,\\1:'I LAND AREAS,ON SLOPES IN EXCI:".SS OF 25 PERCENT,OR ON UNSTABLE ITABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to prcliminary identify sensitive Lands areas at the pre-application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas. and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DI ElA PMEN'1'IS PROI IIBITI.l)\WITHIN I'LOODPLAINS. STEEP SLOPES (Refer to Code Section 18.775.080.C) When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.(180.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.0. CLEAN WATER SERVICES (CWS) BUFFER STANDARDS (Refer to CWS R&O 07-20/USA RegiiLttions-Chapter 3) LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: "I'he VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION & ORDER 07-20 SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION SLOPE ADJACENT WIDTH OF VEGETATED TO SENSITIVE AREA' CORRIDOR PER SIDES • Streams with intermittent flow draining: -.25"n I 10 to <50 acres 15 feet I >50 to <101)acres. 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands >0.5 acre <1;" 50 feet • Rivers, streams,and springs with year-round flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining>100 acres • '..aural lakes and ponds. • Streams with intermittent flow draining: >7.3r'4, 30 feet 10 to <50 acres >50 to <100 acres 50 feet • Existing or created wetlands >25"t, Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure in 25- • Rivers,streams,and springs with year-round flow foot increments from the starting point to • Streams with intermittent Clow draining>100 acres the top of ravine(break in <25%slope), • Natural lakes and ponds add 35 feet past the top of ravine. tStarting point fur measurement=edge<ii tln defined channel :butkful 11 nt,' 1 e streams/mrrs,delineated wetland boundary,delineated spnn{boundary,and/or average high ts,ucr for lakes or ponds,whichever toiler.C:rc.ucsI resource Si. Intermittent springs,li>catcd a minimum of 15 feet within the river/'strc;un or wetland vegetated CITY f* 1"1G.4RD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8 Psi Rc+>dcnnal.APPlicanon.Planning I)ivirn ..ccnun o • cunxdor,shall ni+t serve as a starting point for mcasulent. '\ct;ctated corridor avcragin,;or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition.. ('lite vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet,if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall lx maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor,except as prorided for in the CES.Design and Construction Standard+. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DFATELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership, such as a subdivision, the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract, and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. { CWS Service Provider Letter: PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the CWS R&O 07-20 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas, CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. fl SIGNS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.780) SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTAL.L.AT ION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits(' handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. ► Non-residential developments within the C-G zone shall meet the sign requirements for the commercial zones, 18.780.130C. -1 URBAN FORESTRY PLAN (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.0 and the "Tree Canopy Requirements" Brochure) AN URBAN FORESTRY PLAN IS REQUIRED FOR THE FOIJ WING TYPES OF DEVELOPMENT: Conditional Use (Type III);Downtown Design Review(Type II and III);Minor Land Partition (Type II); Planned Development (Type III); Sensitive Lands Review (Type II and III); Site Development Review (Type II); and Subdivision (Type II and III). The plan needs to be prepared by an ISA certified arborist or landscaped architect. Percentage of mature canopy cover required: % (lie er to Ippendix 2-6 in I:than forestry Manual for a list of bees with r�rrt�rre canopy corer arras) An urban forestry plan shall: - Be coordinated and approved by a landscape architect (the project landscape architect) or a person possessing dual certifications as a certified arborist and certified tree risk assessor(the project arborist); - Meet the tree preservation and removal site plan standards in Section 10, part l of the Urban Forestry Manual; - Meet the tree canopy site plan standards in Section 10, part 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual;and - Meet the supplemental report standards in Section 10,part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual. TREE CANOPY FEE. If the effective percentage of tree canopy cover cannot be met, the applicant shall provide the city a tree canopy fee according to the methodology outlined in Section 10, part 4 of the Urban Forestry Manual. 18.790.040-Discretionary Urban Forestry Plan Review Option In lieu of providing payment of a tree canopy fee when less than the standard effective tree canopy cover required by Section 10, part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual .will be provided, an applicant may apply for a discretionary urban forestry plan review. The discretionary urban forestry plan review cannot be used to modify an already approved urban forestry plan, any tree preservation or tree planting requirements established as part of another land use review approval, or any tree preservation or tree planting requirements required by another chapter in this title. CITY()1 TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 Not. trplicatum/Planning Division.ccnnn I 1 PRESERVATION OF EXIS i ING TREES (Refer to Code Section 18.790.050.C.) 'i n assist in the preservation and/or planting of trees and significant tree groves, the director may apply one or more of the following flexible standards as part of the land use review approval. Use of the flexible standards shall be requested by the project arborist or landscape architect as part of the land use review process. The flexible standards are only applicable to trees that are eligible for credit towards the effective tree canopy cover of the site. Appropriate species of trees in good condition and suitable for preservation receive a 200 percent credit based on their existing canopy area. Refer to Section 11-Part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual for submittal requirements. /1 CLEAR VISION AREA (Refer to Code Chapter 18.795) The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE I+, AINTAINFD BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGI-IT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. • ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.060) MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot-wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 27/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH,unless the parcel is less than 1'/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. CODE CHAPTERS ® 18.33()(Conditional Use) 7 18.620 crie;.ud I mingle Design Standards) ❑ 18.760(Nonconf arming Situations; H 18.340(Director's Interpretation) 7 18.630('1ti'ashiragtun Squaw Regional(:enter) El 18.765 ((Wt.-Street Parking/Ieradinq Requirements) n 18.350(Planned pet drrpment) n 18.640(Durham Quarry I>esign Standards) El 18.775llensitive I Resirttj 18.360(Sit,I)CVLlopment Review) 18.705(.\cows/l*ress/(:rrntlation) 18.780 1r n) {• 1, s, 171 18.37()(Variances/\djustments) n 18,710(.\ccessorr Rcsiikntid Uniis) n 18.785(Temporary U rc Permits) 18.380(Zoning Map/Tem Amendments) [ I 18.715(Deism f:<rrnputanons; a 18.790 ft rb.tn forestry'Plan) 1 18.385(11ise,l3aneous Ptnnrtsj n 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) ® 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) • 18.390(Dectsron\lakuie I'riced ures/Impact ❑ 18.725(1 tivironrntntal Performance ►/ 18.798 finless Communication l'acilrtie) Muds) Standards) El18.410 ,or Law Adjustments) la 18.730(Lxeg iions'I'o Dcedopment D 18.810 (strccI & Utility improvement Standards) Standards+ El 18.420(1.iand Partitions) 18.740(1 listoric 0xrrlay) n 18.430(Subdivisions) n 18.742(1 lime Occupation Permits) • 18.510(Residential Zoning 1)istricts) M18.745(landscaping&Screening Standards) El 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) n 18.750 (Manufactured/Mobil I ionic Reladatir ins) n 18.330(industrial%erntng Distncts) n 18.755 (\Irxed, Solid Waste/Recycling Sroraet f IT1'()E'TIG RD Pre-.kpplicanon Conference Ni ries - - - Page 6 of S Ni 12c.idential il.hlicadr*n Planning Un iliimSection 411 PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. cZ Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. The Planning counter closes at 5:00 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 81/2" x 11". One, S'/z" x 11" map of a proposed project shall be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Applications with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the TigardHearings Officer. A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. • CITY()F TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 Ni Applicati.n Planning 17i+,sinn Scuhm AN ADDITIONAL PRE-ADPL CATION FEE AND CONFERENC WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: John Floyd.Associate Planner CITY OF T'IGARD PLANNING DIVISION PHONE: 503-718-2429 EMAIL: johnfl(cutigard-or.gov CTfI ()F Z IG_1RD Pre-.Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 N N RcsiiknioI \pylic:ui,,n Planning ihvisi ii<,,cium PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES , DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING 4 Till.RE: Cfly NTIpard,Oregon (071111111W,',,Dei hyvrrrrrr Shapinpfl Better Community PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Monis): 2510200 Coiling Tax Lotisl: 901 Use Type: Monopole Tower These notes have been prepared based on the information submitted by the applicant showing a proposed monopole communications tower on leased property at 13835 SW Hall Blvd. The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a prosection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: 0 0 The proposed access is to Hall Blvd, which is a State Highway under the jurisdiction of the Oregon Department of Transportation. The applicant will need to work with ODOT to obtain an access permit or revised access permit, and possible right-of-way dedication. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 015 Oevelnnient Engineering Street improvements: (Suk. ;t to rough proportionality) Partial street improvements and/or future street improvement agreements (where allowed) will be necessary along to include: I _1 feet of pavement from face of curb to centerline ❑ concrete curb ❑ _-foot planter exclusive of curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ -foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: Pavement tapers The applicant will need to provide documentation of access rights. Public street improvements are not anticipated to be required It appears that the development's trip generation will be below the threshold for requiring a traffic study. 18.730.040 Additional Setback Requirements: This section sets requirements for additional setback distance from roadways. The minimum yard requirement shall be increased in the event a yard abuts a street having a right-of-way width less than required by its functional classification on the city's transportation plan map and, in such case, the setback shall be not less than the setback required by the zone plus one-half of the projected road width as shown on the transportation map. i This appears to not be applicable Agreement for Future Street Improvements: In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to provide a future improvement guarantee. The City Engineer will determine the form of this guarantee. The following street improvements may be eligible for such a future improvement guarantee: (1.) This appears to not be applicable (2.) Overhead Utility Lines: Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, if approved by the City Engineer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is approved, it is equal to $ 35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. Sanitary Sewers: CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 5 hrelepmept Engloeeriq The proposed developmer .gust be connected to a public sanity sewer. It appears that a sewer line runs along the western property line. This would not be applicable if no service is necessary. Water Supply: The City of Tigard Public Works Department provides public water service in this area. Coordinate with the TVWD for information regarding adequate water supply and appropriate connection fees for the proposed development. This would not be applicable if no service is necessary. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District [Contact: John Wolff, 503-259-1504] provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm , drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. Storm drainage must connect to a public system of adequate capacity or discharge to a suitable outfall location meeting appropriate standards (such as CWS). The applicant will need to demonstrate how this proposal meets CWS standards. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in- lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof. Please contact the Building Division for the current fee. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ❑ Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ❑ Payment of the fee in-lieu. Water quality treatment may be required. Calculations for sizing of water quality treatment facilities must be submitted to the Development Engineer for review and approval. Water quality facilities also must be reviewed and approved by the city. Review and comply with provisions of Chapter 4 Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (Runoff Treatment and Control). CITY OF TiGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 5 Oeveleprrront Engineering Other Comments: Water quality and detention facility design and construction must be certified by a professional engineer as meeting Clean Water Services requirements. After completion of the construction of these facilities, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the city on city-furnished forms for long-term maintenance of the facilities. This agreement will be recorded and city staff will be periodically inspecting the facilities for compliance with the terms of the agreement. TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT TAX In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) which was replaced in 2008 by a Transportation Development Tax (TDT) that became effective 7/1/09. The TDT program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TDT incorporates the proposed use of the land and the size of the project. The TDT is calculated, due, and payable at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances payment of the TDT may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TDT exceeds the TDT rate for a single-family home. Pay TDT as required. PERMITS Public Facility Improvement (PFI) Permit: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a PFI permit from Development Engineering. A PFI permit application is available at the Planning/Engineering counter in the Permit Center at City Hall. For more extensive work such as street widening improvements, main utility line extensions or subdivision infrastructure, plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The PFI permit application shall include any on-site water quality and detention facilities that may be required as part of the land use approval. The Permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security. Where professional engineered plans are required, the Permittee must execute a Developer/Engineer Agreement, which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. The PFI permit fee structure is as follows: NOTE: If an PFI Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. A PFI permit may be required for this project. This permit (if required) must be obtained before any work begins on site. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Applicatlon Conference Moles Page 4 015 DevelepmeatEngine/rho Site Improve int Permit (SIT). This permit is ge, ally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required, This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. PREPARED BY: Mike McCarthy _ 9117113 DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER DATE Phone: (503)718-2462 E-mail: mikem@tigard-or.gov Revised: March 2012 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 0l 5 Development EnlineerIn0 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS �l 1 a TIGARD City of Tigard May 14, 2014 Zach Philips Pacific Telecom Services 1001 Water Street, Suite 180 Portland, OR 97214 RE: Notice of Incomplete Application Submittal I Cingular Wireless Mono ole 13835 SW Hall Blvd CUP2014-00001 &VAR2 14-00007 Dear Mr. Philips: The City has reviewed your application of April 14, 2014 to construct a new monopole and associated equipment shelter on a residentially zoned property at 13835 SW Hall Blvd. Unfortunately we have found it incomplete and require additional information (listed below). If this information has already been provided, please submit a statement indicating where in the application materials the information is located. 1. The project narrative does not address the entire project site (Tax lots 900 and 901). Please revise the plans and narrative to address all standards across the whole of the project site. 2. The project narrative submitted with the application does not address all applicable standards. Please revise the project narrative to address the following requirements of the Tigard Development Code (Title 18): a. 18.330.030 Approval Standards) — Please revise the project narrative to address approval standards for conditional uses. The narrative does not appear to contain a response to these requirements. b. 18.330.050 (Submission Requirements) —A grading plan and an urban forestry plan consistent with 18.790, and by extension the Tigard Urban Forestry Manual (Sections 2, 10, 11 and 12),were not included with the application. c. 18.390.040 (Type II Procedure) —This section is not relevant to this decision, as a Conditional Use Permit is a Type III procedure. Please revise the project narrative to address 18.390.050 (Type III Procedures). d. 18.745.040 (Street Tree Standards) - This section was not fully addressed. Please revise the project narrative to address the entire project site and criteria a-g of this section. e. 18.745.050.E.1 — This standard appears to be addressed under your response to 18.745.050.B.1. Please revise the narrative to address this directly. 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov 1 ritk f. 18.765.040.8 (Access Drives) — Access drives must be improved with asphalt, concrete, or pervious paving surface. g. 18.790.030.A.1-4 (Urban Forestry Plan Requirements) — Sheet L-2 and responses in the project narrative do not address the entire project site and do not include required information as set forth in Tigard Urban Forestry Manual (Sections 2, 10, 11 and 12) were not included with the application. h. 18.798.060.A.7.b (Landscaping and Screening) — Existing evergreen trees referenced in your response to this standard are not located on the project site or otherwise under control of the applicant or property owner. As such this standard does not appear to have been met. i. 18.798.060.A.8 --- The mitigation measure identified in the Environmental Noise Evaluation (Dinesh Kumar, PE; April 3, 2014) is not included on the project plans. Please revise the plans to include the noise mitigation measure recommended in the report. j. 18.798.080.D (Colocation Request) — Please provide a copy of the letter required in this section. k. 18.798.080.E (RF Justification) — This standard requires a statement from a qualified engineer stating whether necessary service "can or cannot be provided", not the "best option" as stated in the narrative, Please revise as necessary to comply with this standard. 3. Please see comments from the Engineering Division dated May 7, 2014 (attached). This information is necessary to demonstrate compliance with approval criteria for minor modifications of existing development, as set forth in Tigard Community Development Code. If you have questions regarding these items, please feel free to contact me at 503-718-2429 or johnfl@tigard-or.gov. Sincerel John Floyd Associate Planner PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN Project: AT&T COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Date: 5/7/2014 GRADING ►1 Existing and proposed contours shown. _ N/A Are there grading impacts on adjacent parcels? none ►1 Adjacent parcel grades shown. N/A Geotech study submitted? N/A STREET ISSUES a Right-of-way clearly shown. Centerline of street(s) clearly shown. N/A ® _Street name(s) shown. ►1 Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown. /:/ Street profiles shown. N/A ►/ Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo N/A on adjacent parcel(s), etc. /1 Traffic Impact and/or Access Report N/A _ Z Street grades compliant? ® Street/ROW widths dimensioned and appropriate? /1 Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width None appropriate? ® Other: Access driveway An approved ODOT permit will be required. If driveway is required to be paved, paving details must be submitted. SANITARY SEWER ISSUES ® Existing/proposed lines shown. N/A ® Stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? N/A WATER ISSUES Z Existing/proposed lines w/ sizes noted? N/A iI Existing/proposed fire hydrants shown? N/A Proposed meter location and size shown? N/A ® Proposed fire protection system shown? N/A STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES E Existing/proposed lines shown? Submit anyrequired drainage 11 Preliminary sizing calcs for water quality/detention not required 11 provided? N1 /1 Water quality/detention facility shown on plans? not required CO Area for facility match requirements from calcs?_ N/A 2 Facility shown outside any wetland buffer? UX1 Storm stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? N/A The submittal is hereby deemed El COMPLETE I I INCOMPLETE By: _ Date: 5/8/14 REVISED 05114134 John Floyd From: John Floyd Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 5:37 PM To: zphillips©ptswa.com Subject: Clngular Tower/ Hall Blvd /Tigard Attachments: John Floyd.vcf; CUP2014-00001 LTR 5-14-14.pdf Hello Zach, Attached is our completeness determination for the proposed monopole at 13835 SW Hall Blvd here in Tigard. Hardcopy to follow by USPS. As you will note, some of the items are relatively minor and some are more substantive. Feel free to give me a call if you want to discuss or need more detail. Regards, John Floyd 11,11Jahn Floyd City of Tigard Associate Planner i1 Community Development c. 11--- °;":. (503) 718-2429 P';', johnflCtigard-or.gov . ' rt-,r, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. .,}, i 1 Tigard, OR 97223 1 .! — - John Floyd - From: KOIKE Sandra Y <Sandra.Y.KOIKE 7aodot.state.or.us> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 4:37 PM To: John Floyd Subject: FW: AT&T Monopole Attachments: 20130913063657732.pdf; PRE2013-00031 AT&T Monopole Hall Blvd.pdf Hi John, I hope it's not too late to forward on this message regarding the AT&T Monopole case (13835 SW Hall Blvd). Somehow this got lost in a sea of emails. Loretta Kieffer our district reviewer noticed that the applicant needs to apply for an access permit. Please have them contact Loretta at (971) 673-6228 and inquire about the permitting process. Thanks, Sandra From: KIEFFER Loretta L Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 6:36 AM To: KOIKE Sandra Y Cc: JENSVOLD Martin R; BAUMGARTNER Douglas G Subject: RE: AT&T Monopole See attached permit. The driveway to the house is permitted. But the driveway to the barn is not permitted. By looking at their site plans it looks like they plan to use the driveway that is not permitted. Please have them apply for access. From: KOIKE Sandra Y Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 2:17 PM To: KIEFFER Loretta L Subject: AT&T Monopole File: PRE2013-00031 AT&T Monopole Hall Blvd.pdf>> The site for this proposal is: 13835 sw hall blvd, Tigard. Does this property have access permits? Thanks, Sandra Koike Assistant Planner Oregon Department of Transportation, Region 1 sandra.y.koike@odot.state.or.us (503) 731-8282 1 II A -t- p .---/-- ,- _ , 6? 0 („ ie. .„,--LI- State of Oregon ____L-________________________ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ! APPLICATION AND PER IT ' �`' fiYa:rr: l,pll,:u:t t; fr,ra,tt No Highway Division I CONSTRUCT ROAD APPROACH Farr» 81-.734-3347 _ I 21.7)2•;2 Name and Address of Applicant I Applicant hereby applies to the Adminr:,tr:ato • and r ---1 l State Highway Engineer for permission to c onstruci Fred A. Vincent an approach road connection to the ire s 13835 SW Hall Blvd. ! Tigard, Oregon 9 97223 1 side of the _ Beaver ton-Tualatin Highway No. .__.141_ — Wshington 620-22 County I 7 i d�1y:646-8A57 at Mile Post _5.93 , Highway Engineers Y _- _4` j Station --_ _____ -__ as described hereat,. Special Provisions — -- Map Reference _ I Current Rules and Regulations governing Road Approach Permits as adopted by the State of Oregon, Depart- ment of Transportation, Highway Division, are by this reference made a part of this permit. Copies of said Rules and Regulations may be obtained from the District Engineer. 2. The approach(es) shall be constructed in accordance with the T hereto rind by this reference made a part hereof. YPe 2. Rand ApproachSketchattached 3. The following additional drawings are attached hereto and by this reference made a part hercoi 4. Facility served by approach(es) ---PriYate_Rrs.idence__ ___ _ __ — ____ Construction of the approach(es) shall commence on or after -�__ pleted on or before . MaY 19�t7_ and titi?i 1, 6. Applicant or his contractor shall notify the District Engineer at _ - 2131__SW Schol i s Ferry R'} i - - - - Parti and. _.9722x _ , phone 2 2±9_-_5042 covered bythis permit. ,prior t:,commencing work anti after runetatc ting construction of the approach(es) f�> ,, 1 /� ne ;, Iw Rceo;nu;!c•,a:lecl for approval: Di„trict Engineer liegional Engine, Applicant declares he is the owner or lessee of the real property abutting the above described bieliwi.:', nel,l has lb, lawful authuri'r to apply for this permit. This tamed herein and attached hereto; this permit is ceptednaandt Sapproved issued subject `the'applidante nsubjccIand 3li s}id! h i( II and provisions. c nr.: Applicant Fred A. Vincent --_ ADMINISTR TOR AND STATE HIGHWAY ENGINEEtt B \ - (fr .43 iaLyi:L4-0-------i UTILITY PERMIT ENGINEER Date of Application — Effective Date q -24 —80 51-190:-731 R/W LineW 1L II ` The approach covered bythis permit shall P- be constructed in accordance with the ` /1 following dimensions and specifications. Ditch Line - - J Dl iw d .P-\. 4 "ulv. Pipe) . - W-_ 18 _Ri® 15 ` R21" __ 1§1 A- -913-___ 1 Edge of Pvml. V\ 1 Culvert Pipe --^- �— � Required Not Required Hwy. 1 If required: Type--__- - -___ PLAN Diameter_ _ - __Inches Length _--_ - _ ___feet Slope to conform to adjoining hwy- -�` tone baS e . Size Q Type_1 and 1/2„'_°... - Asph. Conc. Pvml: Comp. Thkn.--__ 6-_ _-. ..--_inches `O - -._.__.. °,w 1 Stone levelling Size a Type_31?4-----0- ----_ - - . O Course : Gump. Thkn, inches C) Q st `�.?�'_ N. A.C. Pvmt.: Glass_ ____13_9_r_ C Stone Bose a Levelling Course'�s� - Comp. Thkn.. - - __- . inches APPROACH TYPICAL SECTION II a O -' r p b Hwy. 3 N T' " 3 , X ll 9 c- o c 0 t equn Standard Saerla*,on is -r, Inr.� s„.;.••' , 0 • O..L' a) - . 9 , I Q M c N a I+I To .c J OREGON STATE HIGHWAY [)IVES( iV o u " o 0 Profile cut section ' °'g i 4:i 13 x TYPE 2 ROAD APPROACH i ;,1 1 PAVED r[IT-------- -------T------ ! APPLICANT._-_ -- �tece A. Vincent `4.,culy. Ptpe----"�-_, °rutile fill section N. HWY.___.E3..e -v_erton.Iua_la_tin__NO.._1.4_1.- _ PROFILE 4T SIDE OF HWY._-._ ..-est.-- _-. _ __ ___-_. _____ MILE POST__5•93 - [NGR;; -.,,C]7-,,.��_ FORM 2-73433 n�[: ROAD APPROACH F'.E1 MIT ty( ""6 2 i 6 LARGE PLANS FOR THIS FILE ARE IN THE RECORDS ROOM 44„. \ ----- at&t �`� mobility - '4 "4 °:°°#° a It84 t , 1 '° '°Nlimiiii r.r,4 _........._ mobility PACIFIC TELECOM SERVICES, LLC -, REVISED FINAL ZONING DRAWINGS Y PD32 HALL BLVD ISL. MCDONALD 04/09/2014 REDS V1.O DATE RECEIVED PER 13835 SW HALL BLVDo8io7/13JA TIGARD , OR 97224 APR �'2o14 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING/ENGINEERING PROJECT INFORMATION VICINITY MAP DRAWING INDEX LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: H? _ ; 1/4,c _ _, 4r� SHEET DESCRIPTION BEGINNING AT AN IRON PIPE SET IN THE EAST LINE OF SW AT&T PROPOSES TO CONSTRUCT AN UNMANNED TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY BY INSTALLING A NEW 11 '-5 x 26'-O" �. � 17.rg:: '� EDGEWOOD STREET, WHICH IRON PIPE ( ) _ � � T-1 TITLE SHEET BEARS SOUTH 89' 18' EAST 20.0 FEET FROM THE CI)EQUIPMENT SHELTER SAND A NEW 100'-0" AGL STEEL MONOPOLE WITH 12 8'-0" PANEL ANTENNAS (4 PER SECTOR) c' f8 -1 _ NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 6 GWITHIN A NEW 55 -0 x 35 -0' FENCED COMPOUND. �� G 1 GENERAL NOTES EDGE WOOD, IN THE 217,, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON AND STATE OF OREGON; THENCE -.- SV-1 SITE SURVEY (BY OTHERS) SOUTH 010 30' WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SW ,- � �� '`, ' N L-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN (BY OTHERS) EDGEWOOD STREET 54.18 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE AT THE L-- APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNER. ANGLE POINT; THENCE NORTH 88' 20' WEST ALONG THE ".-4 AT&T MOBILITY CHARLES W COILING L-2 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN (BY OTHERS) SOUTH LINE OF SAID STREET 20.0 FEET TO A POINT ON ' 19801 SW 72ND AVENUE 13835 SW HALL BLVD C A-1 SITE PLAN THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 6; THENCE SOUTH 01' 36' TUALATIN, OR 97062 TIGARD, OR 97223 WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE 241.76 FEET TO A POINT CH0 CONTACT: BRANDON OLSEN PHONE: (503) 936-4529 A-2 PROPOSED COMPOUND PLAN BEARS NORTH 01' 36' EAST 45.4 FEET FROM THE PH: (503) 691-5020 - A-3 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6; THENCE SOUTH 89' 0 18' EAST, PARALLEL TO AND 45.4 FEET DISTANT FROM THE 1 iii- i PERMITTING: ----5 ' g ,� l; A-4 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 6, 40.2 FEET TO THE TRUE AT&T CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: PACIFIC TELECOM SERVICES T ° ;' '4 POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 89' 18' C..) 1001 SW WATER AVEENUE, SUITE 180 ` 1 CONTACT: NANCY HORSTMANN .• , 1 I EAST A DISTANCE OF 241.88 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE; PH: (503) 475-2832 PORTLAND, OR 97214 \- CONTACT: ZACH PHILLIPS -- ��� I r ' THENCE NORTH 01' 00' WEST 275.16 FEET, MORE OR 0 1 ,� i "; /2g LESS, TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 6; J PH: (503) 708-9200 �, � k.. .. THENCE NORTH 89' 18' WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF CO c\J _1 CODE INFORMATION: ZPHILLIPS©PTSWA.COM �� - �,�� � �. � �''' SAID LOT 6 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THAT TRACT J ZONING CLASSIFICATION: R-7 CONVEYED BY DEED TO DELBERT R. HASS, ET UX, CD SITE ACQUISITION: 41 i JJ ---� -- RECORDED IN BOOK 766 PAGE 565, RECORDSd BUILDING CODE: 2009 OBC r< OF. = Et PACIFIC TELECOM SERVICES j WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON; THENCE SOUTH 01 30 0 CONSTRUCTION TYPE: IIB 1001 SW WATER AVEENUE, SUITE 180 , f WEST 150 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID OCCUPANCY: U, S-2 PORTLAND, OR 97214 HASS TRACT; THENCE NORTH 89' 18' WEST 175 FEET, 'f CONTACT: CRAIG COMMERFORD ,� ... ,. MORE OR LESS, TO NORTHEAST CORNER OF THAT TRACT 1 JURISDICTION: CITY OF TIGARD PH: (503) 577-4600 iF#nti __�v DESCRIBED AS PARCEL II IN DEED TO NATALIE L. BUBENCK, r� `L ' CCOMMERFORD@PTSWA.COM ( ' ET AL, RECORDED AUGUST 17, 1971 IN 00 CURRENT USE: RESIDENTIAL '- - dro BOOK 831 PAGE 549, RECORDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, PROPOSED USE: UNMANNED TELECOM FACILITY CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: i....1,--d 1 ' ' OREGON; THENCE SOUTH 01' 30' WEST 145 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID HASS TRACT AND PACIFIC TELECOM SERVICES ,ni-Tof 1 ):,1 THE TRUE POINT OFI. ' 506 2ND AVE, 2ND FLOOR J D1 SEATTLE, WA 98056 ] - SITE LOCATION: (BASED ON NAD 83): CONTACT: ZACHARY NESGODA , ..., c.,<= PH: (206) 342-6383 � � .. LATITUDE: 45' .25i 12.08„" N LONGITUDE: 122 46' 1.36 W TOP OF STRUCTURE AGL: 100' ZNESGODA®PTSWA.COM t' ,�11= 1 111.11111 "II ' � is "a p,, a i I I en a BASE OF STRUCTURE AMSL: 188' 1---)) C(1.1) DRIVINGREC O I TI NS ABBREVIATIONSD PARCEL NUMBER (5): START FROM AT&T REGIONAL OFFICE : A/C AIR CONDITIONING HORZ HORIZONTAL PLYWD PLYWOOD I� 2S102DD00901 AGL ABOVE GROUND LEVEL HR HOUR PROJ PROJECT 1. HEAD SOUTHEAST ON SW 72ND AVE TOWARD SW SAGERT ST 489 FT APPROX APPROXIMATELY HT HEIGHT PROP PROPERTY 2. TAKE THE FIRST RIGHT ONTO SW SAGERT ST 0.4 MI HVAC HEATING PT PRESSURE TREATED 3. TAKE THE FIRST RIGHT ONTO SW MARTINAZZI AVE 0.7 MI BLDG BUILDING VENTILATION REQ REQUIRED POWER: 4. TURN RIGHT ONTO SW BOONES FERRY RD 0.3 MI BLK BLOCKING AIR CONDITIONING RM ROOM REVISIONS PGE 5. CONTINUE ONTO SW UPPER BOONES FERRY RD 1.0 MI SHT SHEET NO. DATE DESCRIPTION INITIAL 6. TURN LEFT ONTO SW DURHAM RD 0.6 MI CLG CEILING ID INSIDE DIAMETER SIM SIMILAR A 08/01/13 ISSUED FOR PZD REVIEW SS TELCO: 7. TURN RIGHT ONTO SW HALL BLVD 1.1 MI CLR CLEAR IN INCH SPEC SPECIFICATION FRONTIER CONC CONCRETE INFO INFORMATION SF SQUARE FOOT 0 08/22/13 ISSUED FOR FZD REVIEW CBK DESTINATION WILL BE ON THE LEFT CONST CONSTRUCTION INSUL INSULATION SS STAINLESS STEEL 1 03/06/14 REVISED FZD'S KRC CONT CONTINUOUS INT INTERIOR STL STEEL 2 04/09/14 REVISED FZD'S KRC IBC INTERNATIONAL STRUCT STRUCTURAL GENERAL INFORMATION: DBL DOUBLE BUILDING CODE STD STANDARD 1. PARKING REQUIREMENTS ARE UNCHANGED. DIA DIAMETER SUSP SUSPENDED 2. TRAFFIC IS UNAFFECTED. DIAG DIAGONAL LBS POUNDS DN DOWN MAX MAXIMUM THRU THROUGH DET DETAIL MECH MECHANICAL TNNG TINNED I DWG DRAWING MTL METAL TYP TYPICAL APPROVAL / SIGN OFF OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGSMFR MANUFACTURE EA EACH MGR MANAGER UNO UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ELEV ELEVATION MIN MINIMUM NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS PROECT TEAM V 1 CONSULTANT GROUP SIGN OFF DATE SIGNATURE AT&T SIGN OFF DATE SIGNATURE ELEC ELECTRICAL MISC MISCELLANEOUS VERT VERTICAL LABELED AS CONSTRUCTION SET J CONSTRUCTION MANAGER COMPLIANCE EQ EQUAL RO ROUGH OPENING VIF VERIFY IN FIELD EQUIP EQUIPMENT ' NA NOTPLICABLE PROJECT ARCHITECT PROJECT SURVEYOR LANDLORD REPRESENTATIVE INTERCONNECT EXT EXTERIOR NIC NOT W CONTRACT W/ WITH SHEET TITLE w/a WITHOUT THOMAS R HOLLAND, AIA DUNCANSON COMPANY, INC PROJECT MANAGER OPERATIONS FIN FINISH NTS NOT TO SCALE WP WATER PROOF TITLE SHEET PACIFIC TELECOM SERVICES, LLC 145 SW 155TH STREET, SUITE 102 FLUOR FLUORESCENT 506 2ND AVENUE, SUITE 210 SEATTLE, WA 98166 SITE ACQUISITION RF ENGINEER FLR FLOOR OC ON CENTER SEATTLE, WA 98056 CONTACT: KEVIN WALKER FT FOOT OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER CONTACT: AMANDA MARTIN PH: (206) 244-4141 ZONING RF MANAGER PH: (206) 342-6399 CONSTRUCTION GA GAUGE SHEET NUMBER EMAIL: AMARTIN©PTSWA.COM GALV GALVANIZED EE ENGINEER GC GENERAL CONTRACTOR GRND GROUND T.._i REVIEWERS SHALL CLEARLY PLACE INITIALS ADJACENT TO EACH REDLINE NOTE AS DRAWINGS ARE BEING REVIEWED GYP BD GYPSUM WALL BOARD THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO CARRIER SERVICES IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. I I GENERAL NOTES: 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT AND NETWORK CARRIER 19. WHEN ROOF TOP OR TOP FLOOR DECK TEMPORARY STAGING IS REQUIRED, 43. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE PROTECTION FOR THE SAFETY -4111.10,, OMISSIONS, OR INCONSISTENCIES AS THEY MAY BE MATERIALS SHALL BE EVENLY DISTRIBUTED OVER ROUGH FRAMED FLOORS OR OF THE OWNER'S EMPLOYEES, WORKMEN, AND ALL TIMES DURING THE �,..,,, at8t OFANYERRORS, , DISCOVERED IN PLANS, DOCUMENTS, NOTES, OR SPECIFICATIONS, PRIOR ROOFS SO AS NOT TO EXCEED THE DESIGNED LIVE LOADS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT. _ TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED BY, DEMOLITION. STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY SHORING AND/OR BRACING IS TO BE PROVIDED mobility THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRECTING ANY ERROR, WHERE THE STRUCTURE DOESN'T HAVE THE DESIGN STRENGTH FOR 44. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO PAY FOR ALL NECESSARY PERMITS OMISSION, OR INCONSISTENCY AFTER THE START OF CONSTRUCTION WHICH ADDITIONAL LOADING. AND/OR FEES WITH RESPECT TO THE WORK TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT. HAS NOT BEEN BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF ARCHITECT AND NETWORK BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS SHALL BE FILED BY THE OWNER OR HIS CARRIER CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER AND SHALL INCUR ANY 20. SEAL ALL PENETRATIONS WITHIN FIRE-RATED AREAS WITH U.L, LISTED OR REPRESENTATIVE. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN PERMIT (UNLESS OTHER EXPENSES TO RECTIFY THE SITUATION. THE MEANS OF CORRECTING ANY FIRE MARSHALL APPROVED MATERIALS IF APPLICABLE TO THE SUBJECT ARRANGEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE) AND MAKE FINAL PAYMENT FOR SAID ERROR SHALL FIRST BE APPROVED BY ARCHITECT AND NETWORK CARRIER FACILITY AND OR PROJECT SITE. DOCUMENT(S). CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER. 21. BUILDING INSPECTORS AND/OR OTHER BUILDING OFFICIALS ARE TO BE CARRIER'S REPRESENTATIVE SHALL REVIEW AND APPROVEH 2. PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF BIDS, CONTRACTORS INVOLVED SHALL VISIT NOTIFIED PRIOR TO ANY GROUND DISTURBANCE, CONSTRUCTION, AND ANY 45. NETWORK DRAWINGS AND SAMPLES FOR CONFORMANCE WITH DESIGN CONCEPT. SOP THE JOB SITE TO FAMILIARIZE THEMSELVES WITH ALL CONDITIONS OTHER PROJECT EFFORT AS MANDATED BY THE GOVERNING AGENCY. AFFECTING THE PROPOSED PROJECT, CONTRACTORS PRIOR TO THE NETWORK CARRIER'S REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT APPROVAL OF A SEPARATE IIVr'� COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION AND THE CONTRACTOR HAVING BEEN 22. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE A PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER WITH A RATING OF ITEM SHALL NOT INCLUDE APPROVAL OF AN ASSEMBLY IN WHICH THE ITEM AWARDED THIS PROJECT SHALL VISIT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE WITH THE NOT LESS THAN 2-A OR 2-Al OBC WITHIN 75 FEET TRAVEL DISTANCE TO FUNCTIONS. CONSTRUCTION/CONTRACT DOCUMENTS TO VERIFY FIELD CONDITIONS AND ALL PORTIONS OF PROJECT AREA DURING CONSTRUCTION. CONFIRM THAT THE PROJECT WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED AS SHOWN. PRIOR 46. ALL ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON ROOF SUPPORT FRAMES TO BE PROVIDED BY PACIFIC TELECOM SERVICES, TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION, ANY ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR 23. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE NECESSARY PROVISIONS TO PROTECT EXISTING NETWORK CARRIER, LLC DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS, PAVING, CURBING, DURING CONSTRUCTION. UPON 47. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE HEAVY STEEL PLATES AT OPEN TRENCHES FOR ARCHITECT/ENGINEER VERBALLY AND IN WRITING. COMPLETION OF WORK, CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ANY DAMAGE THAT MAY SAFETY AND TO PROTECT EXISTING GROUND SURFACES FROM HEAVY HAVE OCCURRED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ON OR ADJACENT TO THE EQUIPMENT UTILIZED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 3. THE ARCHITECTS/ENGINEERS HAVE MADE EVERY EFFORT TO SET FORTH IN PROPERTY. THE CONSTRUCTION AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS THE COMPLETE SCOPE OF 48. CONTRACTOR SHALL PATCH AND REPAIR ALL GROUND SURFACES WITHIN THE WORK. CONTRACTORS BIDDING THE JOB ARE NEVERTHELESS CAUTIONED 24. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP GENERAL WORK AREA CLEAN AND HAZARD FREE CONSTRUCTION AREA AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A UNIFORM SURFACE AND THAT MINOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORS IN THE DRAWINGS AND OR DURING CONSTRUCTION DISPOSING OF ALL DIRT, DEBRIS, AND RUBBISH. MAINTAIN EXISTING SURFACE DRAINAGE SLOPES. SPECIFICATIONS SHALL NOT EXCUSE SAID CONTRACTOR FROM COMPLETING CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EQUIPMENT NOT SPECIFIED AS REMAINING ON THE PROJECT AND IMPROVEMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NETWORK THE PROPERTY OR PREMISES. SITE SHALL BE LEFT IN CLEAN CONDITION AND 49. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE EXISTING LANDSCAPE VEGETATION DAMAGED DUE CARRIER PROJECT SCOPE AND THE INTENT OF THESE DOCUMENTS. THE FREE FROM PAINT SPOTS, DUST, OR SMUDGES OF ANY NATURE. TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, AND REPAIR, RESTORE AND MODIFY EXISTING BIDDER SHALL BEAR THE RESPONSIBILITY OF NOTIFYING (IN WRITING) THE IRRIGATION LINES IF NECESSARY TO OPERATING CONDITION, PROVIDING FULL ARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY CONFLICTS, ERRORS, OR OMISSIONS PRIOR 25. NEW CONSTRUCTION INSTALLED ADJACENT EXISTING BUILDINGS OR COVERAGE TO IMPACTED AREAS. TO SUBMISSION OF CONTRACTOR'S PROPOSAL. IN THE EVENT OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL ARCHITECTURALLY MATCH THE EXISTING IN TERMS OF DISCREPANCIES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRICE THE MORE COSTLY OR COLOR, TEXTURE, FINISH MATERIALS, ETC., EXCEPT AS NOTED IN THE PLANS 50. IN THE CASE OF ROOFTOP SOLUTIONS FOR EQUIPMENT AND/OR ANTENNA EXTENSIVE WORK, UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE. AND SPECIFICATIONS. FRAMES WHERE PENETRATION OF EXISTING ROOFING MATERIALS OCCUR, 4. 11X17 COPIES OF DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE SCALED DUE TO 26. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY BACKING, BLOCKING, GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH BUILDING OWNER TO OBTAINCONTACT INFORMATION AND UTILIZE THE EXISTING ROOFING CONTRACTOR OF DISTORTIONS RESULTING FROM MULTIPLE REPROGRAPHIC COPIES. WRITTEN AND/OR OTHER ANCHORAGE DEVICES REQUIRED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF RECORD FOR INSTALLATION, PATCH, REPAIR OR ANY AUGMENTATION TO THE DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALES SHOWN ON PLANS. FIXTURES, MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, PLUMBING, HARDWARE, AND FINISH ITEMS ROOF, AND HAVING THE WORK GUARANTEED UNDER THE ROOFING TO INSURE A PROPER AND CODE COMPUANT INSTALLATION. i CONTRACTORS EXISTING WARRANTY ENSURING 100% MOISTURE PROTECTION. 5. OWNER, CONTRACTOR, AND NETWORK CARRIER REPRESENTATIVE SHALL REVIEW AND CONFIRM THAT PROJECT SCOPE, DESIGN INTENT AND UTILITY 27. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING INSTALLATIONS THAT ARE COORDINATION ITEMS ARE INCLUDED IN THE DRAWINGS AND CONSTRUCTED LEVEL ERECT, EVENLY ALIGNED, PLUMB AND TRUE BASED ON 51. IN THE CASE OF ROOFTOP SOLUTIONS WITH THE INSTALLATION OF ANTENNAS SPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPARE EXISTING WITHIN CONCEALED (SHROUDED) SUPPORT FRAMES OR TRIPODS, GENERAL CONDITIONS WITH THE PROPOSED DESIGN PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE FRP DESIGNER/FABRICATOR TO 6. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES OR INCONSISTENCIES TO THE NETWORK ENSURE THAT THE FINAL FRP SHROUD IS SIMULATING (IN APPEARANCE) r,i,.: NETWORK CARRIER REPRESENTATIVE`TO PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION CARRIER'S REPRESENTATIVE AND FURTHER TO THE A&E SUCH THAT THE NEW EXISTING EXTERIOR BUILDING FACADE MATERIALS, TEXTURES, AND COLORS. PRIOR TO STARTING WORK ON ANY ITEM NOT CLEARLY DEFINED BY THE INSTALLATION WILL LIKEWISE BE LEVEL, ERECT, EVENLY ALIGNED, PLUMB AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURTHERMORE ENSURE THE USE OF COUNTERSUNK CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. TRUE. ARCHITECT AND NETWORK CARRIER SHALL BE NOTIFIED OF ANY OR FLATHEAD FASTENERS IN ALL FRP CONSTRUCTION. WHEN DRAWINGS/ ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR INCONSISTENCIES PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. PHOTOSIMULATIONS ARE PROVIDED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM WORK DURING OWNER'S PREFERRED FINAL CONSTRUCTION REPRESENTS WHAT IS INDICATED IN PHOTOSIMULATION. HOURS TO AVOID DISTURBING NORMAL BUSINESS OR TENANTS. 28. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE PROTECTION FOR ADJOINING PROPERTIES SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR, FROM PHYSICAL HARM, NOISE, DUST, DIRT, AND FIRE AS REQUIRED BY THE CONSTRUCTION COORDINATOR, AND ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FABRICATION AND 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NETWORK CARRIER PROPER INSURANCE GOVERNING AGENCIES. CONSTRUCTION. CERTIFICATES NAMING NETWORK_ CARRIER AS ADDITIONAL INSURED, AND PROVIDE NETWORK CARRIER PROOF OF LICENSE(S) INCLUDING PE & PD 29. WHERE SPECIFIED, MATERIALS TESTING SHALL BE TO THE LATEST STANDARDS 52. IN THE CASE OF ROOFTOP SOLUTIONS FOR EQUIPMENT AND/OR ANTENNA (:) AND/OR REVISIONS AVAILABLE AS REQUIRED BY THE GOVERNING AGENCY FRAMES WHERE ANCHORING TO AN EXISTING CONCRETE ROOF SLAB IS INSURANCE. RESPONSIBLE FOR RECORDING THE RESULTS, REQUIRED, CONTRACTORS SHALL CONFIRM (PRIOR TO SUBMITTING BID) WITH 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE PROJECT DESCRIBED CONSULTING CONSTRUCTION COORDINATOR AND ARCHITECT THE PRESENCE OF ° 30. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STORAGE OF ALL MATERIALS POST TENSION TENDONS WITHIN THE ROOF SLAB RESULTING FROM AN ( � IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY ��..../ RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, AND SHALL NOT STORE OR STAGE MATERIALS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY WITHOUT UNDOCUMENTED DESIGN CHANGE IN THE EXISTING BUILDING AS-BUILT CH SEQUENCES, AND PROCEDURES FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE . A PERMIT TO DO SO FROM THE GOVERNING AGENCIES FOR THIS PURPOSE. DRAWING SET" HAVING INDICATED AN ORIGINAL DESIGN SOLUTION OF WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT. REINFORCED CONCRETE W/ EMBEDDED STEEL REBAR. IN THE EVENT POST I > d- 31. GENERAL NOTES AND STANDARD DETAILS ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS TENSION SLAB SOLUTION IS PRESENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL INCLUDE J N 10. TO BE USED IN ALL CONDITIONS UNLESS ILLUSTRATED AND NOTED m CV THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS PROVISIONS FOR X RAY PROCEDURES (INCLUDED IN BID) FOR ALL ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER'S/VENDOR'S SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. PENETRATION AREAS WHERE ANCHORING OCCURS. J Cn OTHERWISE OR WHERE LOCAL CODES OR ORDINANCES TAKE PRECEDENCE. < 32. TRADES INVOLVED IN THE PROJECT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR OWN 53. GENERAL & SUB CONTRACTORS SHALL USE STAINLESS STEEL METAL LOCKING _ CUTTING, FITTING, PATCHING, ETC., SO AS TO BE PREPARED PROPERLY BY d 11. ALL WORK PERFORMED ON THE PROJECT ALONG WITH ALL MATERIALS TIES FOR ALL CABLING TIE DOWNS AND ALL OTHER GENERAL TIE DOWNS THE WORK OF OTHER TRADES. INSTALLED, SHALL COMPLY IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE (WHERE APPLICABLE). PLASTIC ZIP TIES SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED FOR USE u) c CODES, REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES. CONTRACTOR SHALL LIKEWISEON TOWER NETWORK CARRIER PROJECTS. RECOMMENDED MANUFACTURE ISSUE NOTICE TO ALL SUB-CONTRACTORS THAT THEY. SHALL COMPLY WITH 33. ALL DEBRIS AND REFUSE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE PROJECT PREMISES SHALL BE: PANDUIT CORP, METAL LOCKING TIES MODEL NO. MLT4S-CP Ct ALL LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF AND LEFT IN A CLEAN SWEPT CONDITION AT ALL TIMES BY EACH TRADE AS >� THEY PERFORM THEIR OWN PORTION OF THE WORK. UNDER SERIES-304 {OR EQUAL). PANDUIT PRODUCT DISTRIBUTED BY TRIARC. *........1 ("- DCp t- ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY, MUNICIPALITY, UTILITY COMPANY AND LOCAL/STATE N) JURISDICTIONAL CODES BEARING ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. TW54. ,GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAINREVIEW AND EXECUTE ALL NETWORK r 34. NEORK CARRIER DOES NOT GUARANTEE ANY PRODUCTS, FIXTURES, AND/OR , CARRIER CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS (MOST RECENT REVISION) ASA PART OF ANY EQUIPMENT NAMED BY A TRADE OR MANUFACTURER. GUARANTEE OR _ 12, A COPY OF THE GOVERNING AGENCY ISSUED AND APPROVED PLANS SHALL THIS BID AND CONSTRUCTION PROJECT. BE KEPT IN A PLACE SPECIFIED BY THE GOVERNING AGENCY, AND BY WARRANTY THAT MAY BE IN EFFECT IS DONE THROUGH THE COMPANY OR A 11 THEPRODUCT, _ LAW, SHALL BE AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE FOR INSPECTION AT ALL MANUFACTURER PROVIDING NG FIXTURE, AND/OR EQUIPMENT ; 55. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN, REVIEW AND EXECUTE ALL NETWORK TIMES. THE ORIGINAL PERMIT SET PLANS ARE NOT TO BE USED BY THE UNLESS SPECIFIC RESPONSIBILITY IS ALSO PROVIDED BY THE CARRIER CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS (MOST RECENT REVISION) AS A PART OF WORKMEN. ALL CONSTRUCTION SETS SHALL REFLECT THE SAME ` CONTRACTOR/SUBCONTRACTOR IN WRITTEN FORM. THIS BID AND CONSTRUCTION PROJECT. INFORMATION AS GOVERNING AGENCY APPROVED PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO MAINTAIN ONE SET OF PLANS, IN GOOD CONDITION, 35. CAUTION! CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! BURIED UTIUTIES EXIST IN THE AREA 56. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO SET ELECTRONIC TILTS FOR NEWLY , =COMPLETE WITH ALL REVISIONS, ADDENDA, AND CHANGE ORDERS ON THE AND UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN MAY NOT BE COMPLETE, CONTACT THE INSTALLED ANTENNAS UNDER THE CONDITION THAT THE GC OBTAIN THE MOST -PREMISES AT ALL TIMES UNDER THE DIRECT CARE OF THE ONE-CALL UTILITY LOCATE SERVICE A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO RECENT COPY OF THE RF TILT INFORMATION SUCH THAT THE ACCURATE SUPERINTENDENT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY THE NETWORK CONSTRUCTION. C. V CONTROLLER CAN BE ORDERED AND INSTALLED.CARRIER CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER WITH A COPY OF ALL ci") REVISIONS, ADDENDA, AND/OR CHANGE ORDERS AT THE CONCLUSION OF 36. WHEN APPLICABLE, CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO CALL, COORDINATE AND I57. A STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS SHALL. BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED TO THE THE WORK AS A PART OF THE AS-BUILT DRAWING RECORDS. MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR R.O.W. AND/OR PRIVATE PROPERTY LOCATES - NETWORK CARRIER REPRESENTATIVE AND GC DEMONSTRATING CAPACITY AT BASED ON SPECIFIC SITE REQUIREMENTS. THE EXACT LOCATION OF EXISTING CONDITIONS TO SUSTAIN ADDITIONAL HEAVY 13. THE STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF ADJACENT CONSTRUCTION OR FACILITIES BATTERY CABINETS OR OTHER OUT OF SCOPE EQUIPMENT. ARE NOT TO BE ALTERED BY THIS CONSTRUCTION PROJECT UNLESS 37. SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL SITE INFORMATION. NOTED OTHERWISE. 38. CONTRACTORS TO DOCUMENT ALL WORK PERFORMED WITH PHOTOGRAPHS 58. THE GC SHALL PROVIDE MATERIALS LIST (BOM) TO THE NETWORK CARRIER 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STUDY THE STRUCTURAL, ELECTRICAL, AND SUBMIT TO NETWORK CARRIER'S REPRESENTATIVE ALONG WITH REDUNED • REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. MECHANICAL, AND PLUMBING PLANS AND CROSS CHECK THEIR DETAILS CONSTRUCTION SET. NOTES, DIMENSIONS, AND ALL REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO THE START OF REVISIONS ANY WORK. NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 39. CONTRACTOR SHALL DOCUMENT ALL CHANGES MADE IN THE FIELD BY NO. DATE DESCRIPTION INITlA1 MARKING UP '(REDLINING) THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION SET AND _ A 08/01/13 ISSUED FOR PZD REVIEW SS 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COMPLETE SECURITY SUBMITTING THE REDLINED ALONG WITH PHOTOGRAPHS PER NETWORK OF THE JOB SITE WHILE WORK IS IN PROGRESS UNTIL THE JOB IS CARRIER REQUIREMENTS. 0 08/22/13 ISSUED FOR FZD REVIEW CBK COMPLETE. 1 03/06/14 REVISED FZD'S KRC 40. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE AND SEEK APPROVAL OF ALL 2 04l /09 14 REVISED FZD'S KRC 16. THE CONTRACTOR HAS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF LOCATING ALL EXISTING POWER DRAW, INSTALLATION AND/OR MODIFICATIONS WITH POWER COMPANY, UTILITIES SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS, ALONG WITH OWNER AND JURISDICTION AS REQUIRED, CONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT POWER PROTECTING THEM FROM DAMAGE. THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTOR INSTALLATION SOLUTION(S) TO NETWORK CARRIER REPRESENTATIVE, PROJECT SHALL BEAR THE EXPENSES OF REPAIR AND/OR REPLACEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND ARCHITECT. UTILITIES OR OTHER PROPERTY DAMAGE RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS .IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK. 41. ANY SUBSTITUTIONS OF MATERIALS AND/OR EQUIPMENT, MUST BE APPROVED 17. ALL EXISTING CONSTRUCTION, EQUIPMENT, AND FINISHES NOTED TO BE BY NETWORK CARRIER CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. REMOVED SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND WILL 42. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE. RESPONSIBLE FOR AND SHALL REMEDY - NOT. FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE WITH THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS: ALL FAULTY, INFERIOR, AND/ORIMPROPER MATERIALS, DAMAGED GOODS, LABELEDAS CONSTRUCTION SETA. PROPERTY NOTED TO BE RETURNED TO THE OWNER. AND/OR FAULTY WORKMANSHIP FOR ONE (1) YEAR AFTER THE PROJECT IS B. PROPERTY NOTED TO BE REMOVED BY THE OWNER. COMPLETE ACCEPTING UNDER THIS CONTRACT BETWEEN THE OWNER AND THE 18. THE GOVERNING AGENCIES, CODE AUTHORITIES, AND BUILDING INSPECTORS CONTRACTOR. EXCEPTION: THE ROOFING SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH A SHALL PROVIDE MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES, MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR ALL WORK DONE COSIGNED BY THE GENERAL SHEET TITLE CONTRACTOR, TO MAINTAIN THE ROOFING IN A WATERTIGHT CONDITION FOR A MATERIALS, AND FINISHES USED- THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT. TRADE GENERAL NOTES t STANDARDS AND/OR PUBLISHED MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS MEETING PERIOD OF TWO (2) YEARS STARTING AFTER THE DATE OF SUBSTANTIAL OR EXCEEDING DESIGN REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE USED FOR INSTALLATION. COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT, UNLESS OTHERWISE WRITTEN IN THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE OWNER AND THE CONTRACTOR. SHEET NUMBER G 1 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED `IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE, ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES .TO CARRIER SERVICES IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. ' I I LATITUDE/LONGITUDE POSITION LEGEND COORDINATE DATA AT PROPOSED MONOPOLE LOCATION: SUBJECT BOUNDARY LINE __________ _____ NAD 83 ti^� �� � LAT - 45'25'12.08" N NAVD 88 — - RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTERLINE ,.....- Your world. Delivered. LONG 122'46'01.36" W ELEV. 188.0 FEET — — — — RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 1 ADJACENT BOUNDARY LINE J " " SECTIONAL BREAKDOWN LINE BENCHMARK IS JIME NAVD =- GPS S OP OVERHEAD POWER LINE ELEVNGS = 250.COR0STATION. UP BURIED POWER LINE BURIED GAS LINE CIT BURIED TELEPHONE LINE r I ELEVATION DERIVED USING GPS. ACCURACY UT BURIED TELEPHONE LINE MEETS OR EXCEEDS 1A STANDARDS AS DEFINED ON THE FAA ASAC INFORMATION SHEET 91:003. W BURIED WATER LINE PACIFIC TELECOM SERVICES, ss BURIED SANITARY SEWER LLC 30'--y- 502 Second Avenue S. Suite 210 NOTES SD BURIED STORM DRAIN : Beattie, WA. 98104 Phone: (206) 342-9000 Fax (206) 903-8513 TREETOP I 1) NO TITLE RESEARCH PROVIDED AT THIS TIME. . . DITCH LINE/FLOW LINE EL=324± CALCULATED BOUNDARY MAY CHANGE UPON RECEIPT ROCK RETAINING WALL OF TITLE. TREETOP TREETOP 2) FIELD WORK CONDUCTED IN JULY 2013. VEGETATION LINE EL=328± TAX LOT DF20 DF16 0 3) BASIS OF BEARING: OREGON STATE PLANE o CHAIN LINK FENCE EL=327±4E. ELE337± #2S102DD00902 828 Q COORDINATE SYSTEM, NORTH ZONE (NAD83). WOOD FENCE 75.1a �� > I 4) UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON, IF ANY, TREETOP ' \ /N )1?)�/ > WERE DELINEATED FROM SURFACE EVIDENCE AND/OR X BARBED WIRE/WIRE FENCE EL=315± DS36 _•J UTILITY COMPANY RECORDS. CRITICAL LOCATIONS p TRANSFORMER FIRE HYDRANT DECIDUOUS ,e,---- ---•-• �, 6,,/ rilr PARCEL BOUNDARY, TYP CLUMP-48 ,,,,. ,, ,. 81.0SHOULD BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO DESIGN AND a CONSTRUCTION. LIGHT STANDARD 64 GATE VALVE TREETOP '"''' ,...-- "� ~ At) ' 512 m 5) FEMA DESIGNATION: ZONE X (AREAS DETERMINED TO p POWER VAULT ® WATER METER • EL=249± DF --'DS18 ,�- BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN), .ie J { ® UTILITY BOX FIRE STAND PIPE TAX LOT / / O! ,Z-- DS02 DS06 PANEL 517 OF 650, FIRM MAP NUMBER 4i02760517C, #2S102DD00901 ,�1 --K- iF10 i w K.✓'`ti TREES TAX LOT Q EFFECTIVE DATE FEBRUARY 18, 2005. # UTILITY POLE 0 CATCH BASIN, TYPE I DF22 / #2S102DD00900 = Q E— POLE GUY WIRE r CATCH BASIN, TYPE II TAX LOT 98.f 1 /DF18 ! /� ,,,` `' 186 OS3 74.7J. 2S102DD00903 LATITUDE/LONGITUDE �/ 55.7 APPROX. i� GAS VALVE �- SIGN D U N C A N S O N # 7 4 TREES / DS02 DS02� \ POSITION 1 TELEPHONE POLE (l) Company'In?" TREETOP / / cs' { GAS METER o BOLLARD CENTER OF PROPOSED EL=262f1 DS24 I z> r/r//iriiriiir,�iii�riiii�iiir T TELEPHONE VAULT D MAIL BOX 145 SW 155th Street,Suite 102 100' MONOPOLE / 62.3 / Seattle, Washington 98166 11 .,... ' / / / ()DSO \ jo TELEPHONE RISER 23•21 SPOT ELEVATION Phone 2062444141 NOTE: Fax 206.244.4455 4 80 -, GRASS DS0103 - 45' ,/ , , , 1) ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL " 1k 182 I / ,..- DSOl j (AMSC) AND ARE REFERENCED TO THE NAVD88 DATUM, TREETOP _ ---- 184 -'' ,�-~' :2 0) I BARN I 2) ALL TOWER, TREE AND APPURTENANCE HEIGHTS ARE SITE EL=257± �, ..-' DS03 DS01 PEAK EL = 22365 i ABOVE GROUND LEVEL (AGL) AND ARE ACCURATE TO 186 f ± 3 FEET OR ± 1% OF TOTAL HEIGHT, WHICHEVER IS PD32 557PROPOSED / n GREATER. I-IALL BLVD AND 8� GRASS �.-- ,X , 1 55 35 __-- i '�s MCDONALD T. DF55 _ TREE LEGEND13a sw l-.BLVD � LEASE AREA 144,1 TREES la i \ riiii iiiriiiirr //////LLT °�° 0 '.> - I , OR 97224 a SITE BENCHMARK !_._. _ ALDER 100d NAIL APPROX UTILITY POLE _ DF50 .,... "'� M P=MAPLE TEE DRAWING was C'FATE)FOR TIE DECIDUOUS TREE 1 . W TRANSFORMER "SURVEY CONTROL" — "� : / _ 119.0 - :.. :. DS DECIDUOUS EXCUMet of71Ea-Bir MECH. ELEV.=189.1 _ .._ DF17 DF70' `'` TREETO' • :. 12 --TRUNK DIAMETER (IN) MA=MADRONA�� Aim IS NOT TO UST IN YMFiOLE OR N PART AL . . - I VIll1'HOU>•MIFI<tTEI'i UtHVF9¢,4TtoN OK=OAK A 73.8 6719 71.7 �E =257± TREETOP \ � APPROX. FIRE 8AD CCB+tT. T �,�, . . .... �i u �✓ \! �� i EL=248± -' '� �,� j TYPE CH=CHERRY Q2 Du�c; COMPANY,Nc. CEi9(IS CE05 '� T o rn �. N tp ..i 3 I HYDRANT DFO9 DF11 DF16 -----o a EVERGREEN TREE CE=CEDAR FCD. CREW: JAR/HD TAX LOT 627 70.5 o 0 TREETOP � . _ - _ - � -- �_ DF=DOUGLAS FIR TAX LOT ► EL=2651 o #2s102DD00811 / FCD, BOOK: 294 62 #2S102DD06000HE=HEMLOCK f DF18 PI=PINE DRAWN BY, CJD APPROX. ,, SW FANNO CREEK DRIVE 195.2 EVG=EVERGREEN ' TAX LOT `�0 TAX LOT TELEPHONE POLE I ' I"— — i JOB #: 01792.1133 �r / #2S102DD05900 �#2S102DD00809 - HEIGHT AGL IF MEASURED , HOUSE TAX LOT p4 A NOTE. 7 18 . 13 #2S102DD00801 TREE DRIP LINES ARE NOT TO SCALE. TREE SYMBOLS iii ,rr r / REFERENCE TRUNK LOCATION ONLY, TRUNK DIAMETERS iii) �, i HOUSE ;� WERE APPROXIMATED AT 3.5 TO 4' ABOVE GROUND LEVEL. DATE.REVISIONS rl -4/ / r / i TREES SHOWN ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND OTHER E. Jo`v / I DATE DESCRIPTION BY N / TREES AND VEGETATION MAY EXIST. U a4 SITE INFORMATION o Li, izga TAX LOT NUMBER 2S1020000901 c� !rti3. SITE ADDRESS 13835 SW HALL BLVD co �, GRAPHIC SCALE .s� ;,=i* -• TIGARD, OR 97224 ZONING R7 30 0 13 30 60 _ 120 ./ mm�► _.,� ;;;;kIr cucrur TOTAL LOT AREA TO BE DETERMINED 11 * S) Fr ilEitiir PROJECT AREA 1,925 S.F. ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 30 ftICI HAMM' iutmas - REGISTERED LEGAL DESCRIPTION t Lin aneartillig ZUNI= SURVEYREFERENCE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NO TITLE RESEARCH PROVIDED AT THIS TIME. 1. RECORD OF SURVEY NO. 3987, RECORDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, OR. PRELIMINARY ca 2. PARTITION PLAT NO. 1995-108, RECORDS OF m 217 _ WASHINGTON COUNTY, OR. OREGON MAY 10, 2011 _ SITE BOUNDARY DISCLAIMER JONATHAN MARCO BECKER 84870 0 THIS PLAN DOES NOT REPRESENT A BOUNDARY SW FANNO SURVEY. SUBJECT AND ADJACENT PROPERTY LINES RENEWS: 12/31/ gitF:).R.T7ORNEDPSON.:.TH ITEM NUMBER IN 'SCHEDULE B' CREEK DR. ARE DEPICTED USING FIELD-FOUND EVIDENCE AND EASEMENTSt. RECORD INFORMATION. THE FOLLOWING EASEMENTS FROM THE REFERENCED TITLE REPORT CONTAIN SUFFICIENTV---------------'-------- SHEET TITLE INFORMATION TO BE DEPICTED ON THE PLAN. OTHER EASEMENTS OR ENCUMBRANCES, IF SW MCDONALD ' ANY, MAY AFFECT THE PROPERTY, BUT LACK SUFFICIENT INFORMATION TO BE SHOWN. ST CAUTION. EXISTING SITE SURVEY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES EXIST IN THE AREA AND SEC 2, TWP 2 S, RNG 1 W, WM NO TITLE RESEARCH PROVIDED AT THIS TIME. UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN MAY 8E INCOMPLETE. i / " , - • KRUSE WY. STATE LAW REQUIRES THAT CONTRACTOR CONTACT THE ONE-CALL UTILITY LOCATE SERVICE AT LEAST 48 SHEET NUMBER VICINITY MAP \)7(1 HOURS BEFORE STARTING ANY CONSTRUCTION. SW BONITA RD NOT TO SCALE - 1-800-424-5555 SV1 ,