06/25/1992 - Packet 99W TASK FORCE AGENDA
JUNE 25, 1992
7:00 P.M.
TIGARD CITY HALL - TOWN HALL
13125 SW HALL BLVD
TIGARD, OREGON 97223
1. Call to Order/Introductions
2. Roll Call: Clark Cook Deuth Eddy
Edwards Hawley Holland Moore
Reilly Schwartz Schweitz
Alternates: Carver Hopkins
3. Welcoming remarks and purpose - (Steve Clark)
4. Presentation of the proposed project
A. Project Description - (Randy Wooley)
B. General information on time frame, financing, acquisition
and construction issues - (Ted Reasey - ODOT)
5. COMMENTS FROM PUBLIC
6. Summary and Wrap up - (Steve Clark)
7. Adjourn
br/99WAgend.Mst
99W TASK FORCE MINUTES
April 23, 1992
1. Meeting was called to order at 7:10 P .M.
2. Roll Call
Present : Clark, Deuth, Edwards, Hawley, Moore, Schweitz, Carver,
Jervais in place of Eddy, Schwartz (arrived 7 :25 p.m. ) ,
Hopkins (arrived 7 :30 p.m. ) , Reilly (arrived 8 :30 p.m. )
Also present: City Staff: Community Development Director Ed
Murphy, City Engineer Randy Wooley, and Acting Task
Force Secretary Diane Jelderks
ODOT Staff: Ted Keasey
3. Visitor's Agenda and Comments
Pat Anderson, owner of property at Pacific Highway and Frewing
expressed concern for the community if Pacific Highway was turned
into six lanes.
Ernest Munch, representing Spieker Partners, distributed a letter
from Walt Mulvey, Chief Operating Officer for Smith' s Home
Furnishings, stating concerns regarding the proposed changes for 99W
that would impact their business.
Larry Bissett, Acting Secretary for the Committee for Tigard' s
Transportation Alternatives, distributed a letter he had written to
Michal Wert, ODOT, regarding proposed local bypass of 99W for Tigard
via the Dartmouth extension and collector-distributor interface with
Hwy 217 .
4. Approval of minutes
Deuth moved and Hawley seconded to approve the minutes of the March
19th meeting, correcting name Ernie Powell to Ernie Munch. Motion
passed by majority of members present . Moore abstained.
5. Staff Report by City/ODOT on information requested
City Engineer Randy Wooley reviewed package of material titled `Data
for 99W Task Force, April 23, 1992 . ' Information included
illustrations and information on level-of-service A through E; level
of services for 99W/Hall intersection with existing and proposed
improvements; traffic counts for Garden Park entrances, Warner, and
217 off and on ramps; accident information and summary; and possible
projects with estimate of cost.
Committee discussed how long level of service would last with
proposed improvements; traffic turning movement at 99W/Hall, Garden
Park, and 217; length of study; width of proposed lanes, and options
available.
99W TASK FORCE MEETING MINUTES - APRIL 23, 1992 PAGE 1
:
Discussion followed regarding time frame necessary for submittal to
ODOT to have improvements included in their six-year plan. Ted
Keasey explained that the best time would be now, but the sooner the
better with the latest time being June or July. He added, that if
the Committee recommends funding for staff' s proposed capacity
improvements, ODOT would require the median to be included for
safety. Also, they cannot get Federal funds for substandard
improvements.
6. Consideration of methods for discussing any proposed interim
improvements with property/business owners.
Ernie Munch reviewed concept for the area stating that 90% of their
traffic comes from the north and constructing a median would be a
disaster. He showed a plan proposing a one-way access road along
the 217 southbound entrance ramp.
City staff favored the concept, however, felt there may be problems
with signing, grade, and the sharp turn.
Ted Keasey stated that ODOT would not allow an entrance on a
controlled access . Mainly for safety reason and to maintain the
integrity of the freeway.
Open discussion regarding the proposal, the possibility of making
a case that the proposal would benefit the community, who would pay
for the improvements, and the time frame in which a decision would
need to be made.
Edwards moved and Moore seconded to have City staff look in depth
at staff' s proposal and Mr. Munch' s proposal, checking with
businesses in the area, and forward their responses to this
Committee. Motion carried unanimously.
Discussion followed regarding next meeting date. Ted Keasey
explained that they need to arrive at a dollar figure in as short
of time as possible. Further discussion on cost of improvements.
Schwartz moved and Hawley seconded that staff forward to City
Council a proposed amount which includes the estimated cost for
construction of Randy Wooley' s proposal, Ernie Munch' s proposal,
plus some additional for contingency. The committee recommends that
the Council request that ODOT add the proposed amount to their six
year plan. Motion carried unanimously.
7. Update on "Subarea Analysis" Proposal
Randy Wooley stated that a Subarea Analysis is feasible. Metro
thought it was a good idea and thought it could be done in 1994 .
Suggested area for study would be I-5 to the east, Taylor Ferry Road
and Scholls Ferry Road to Fanno Creek (includes Washington Square
& Metzger) to the north, along 99W to either the Tualatin River or
the Tualatin Sherwood Road to the south. The good part is it would
include several jurisdictions, the bad part is it would be a two-
year wait . The issue is to be pursued and brought back for the next
meeting.
99W TASK FORCE MEETING MINUTES - APRIL 23, 1992 PAGE 2
VAW
8. Presentation of Dartmouth Extension/217 - Response to ODOV s
Analysis/statement (kittelson)
Wayne kittelson commented that he agreed with Randy Wooley and Ted
Keasey regarding needing improvements to 99W, however, the accident
problem needs to be kept in perspective. He explained the
difference between accident rates calculated on a million vehicles
entering an intersection rate versus a million vehicles in a mile
area rate. He suggested that a channeled median could be created
which allows left turns southbound onto Garden Park but would not
allow left turns from Garden Park onto Pacific Highway. This would
drop the accident ratio to .5 for one million cars.
Wayne kittelson presented a slide presentation for the extension of
Dartmouth (Kittelson Proposal) . His presentation included summary
of proposal benefits, summary of issues raised by ODOT, circulation
impacts of the Kittelson proposal, need for widening 99W, and the
impacts of the Kittelson proposal on Highway 217 .
Discussion followed on how the collector distribution roads work,
locations (Eugene) where they are currently being used, location of
the connection across 217, and what impact the proposal would have
to existing buildings.
9. Adjournment 9:55 P.M.
dj/99WTASKF
99W TASK FORCE MEETING MINUTES - APRIL 23, 1992 PAGE 3
t
1 ,
Engineers
Planners
Economists
Scientists
Portland Office
June 25, 1992_
PDX31425.AO
Mr. Steve Clark, Chairman
99W Task Force
City of Tigard
13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Subject: Dartmouth Extension/Hwy 217 Improvements
Dear Mr. Clark:
The task force has been reviewing and discussing ways of improving traffic circulation in and
through the Tigard area. One of the plans that has been presented to you is an alternative plan
prepared by Kittelson & Associates. This plan presented an alternative way of handling traffic'
though Tigard and in particular it improves the capacity of Hwy 99W by providing a parallel
route.
The Kittelson plan proposes to construct an overcrossing, over Hwy 217 midway between the
72nd interchange and the 99W interchange utilizing the extension of Dartmouth. The Dartmouth
extension would then continue south and tie into Hall Blvd. The Kittelson plan also proposes
to construct an interface with Hwy 217 via a collector/distributor (C/D) and interchange ramps
at the new Dartmouth overcrossing. This plan does not connect directly to Hwy 217 but rather
to the C/D system.
On behalf of our client we request that this alternative be given serious consideration, and that
accommodations be made in ODOT's design for the Phase I I-5/Hwy 217 improvements, so as
not to preclude its construction in the future. If accommodations are not made, the option of
developing the C/D system in the future may be lost or very costly to construct in the future.
We have prepared a preliminary cost comparison between the ODOT proposed improvements
for 99W and Hwy 217 with the alternative improvements presented in the Kittelson plan. The
costs presented here are for comparing the relative costs of constructing the different alternatives
at a very conceptual level. The actual cost of construction will vary from the costs presented
Serving Oregon and Southwest Washington from two locations:
Portland Office 825 N.E.Multnomah,Suite 1300,Portland,OR 97232-2146 503.235.5000 503.235.2445 FAX
Corvallis Office 2300 N.W. Walnut Blvd.,Corvallis,OR 97330-3538 503.752.4271 503.752.0276 FAX
*wool
Page 2
June 25, 1992
PDX31425.A0
here.
The costs prepared for this comparison deal with three major areas requiring improvements.
1.) Hwy. 99W corridor from I-5 south to Commercial St., 2.) Hwy 217 from the 72nd Ave.
overcrossing north to the Greenburg Interchange, 3.) The Dartmouth Extension from I-5 south
to Hall Blvd.
Hwy. 99W Improvements
Improvements proposed by ODOT include the Pfaffel St. to Commercial St. project with
construction estimated by ODOT to cost in the range of$4.53 million. To handle the
traffic projected for 99W the section of 99W from I-5 to Pfaffel St. should also be
improved. This would provide the missing link between the Pfaffel and I-T
improvements. We did not prepare preliminary construction cost estimate for this section
of the highway, however, the cost will probably be in the same cost category as the
Pfaffel to Commercial section. For comparison purposes, the cost of this section of the
highway is assumed to be approximately $4 million.
Hwy 217 Improvements
ODOT Plan
ODOT is anticipating that Hwy 217 will eventually be widened to 6 lanes, three in each
direction. Auxiliary lanes will also be required between the on and off ramps which
result in four lanes each direction for certain portions of the highway. For estimating
purposes we assumed auxiliary lanes are between:
72nd NB on ramp and 99W off ramp
99W NB on ramp and Greenburg Rd. off ramp
Greenburg Rd. SB on ramp and 99W off ramp
99W SB on ramp and 72 Ave. off ramp
We estimated the cost to widen Hwy 217 from 72nd Ave. north to Greenburg Rd. to a
six lane facility with auxiliary lanes to be in the range of $7.6 million. This assumes
some improvements to the ramps and improvements to the 99W and Hall Blvd.
overcrossings.
v �rr►1
Page 3
June 25, 1992
PDX31425.AO
Hunziker St. Overcrossina
One of the improvements proposed for the Kruse Way interchange included an
overcrossing of Hwy 217 for Hunziker St. We estimate the cost to construct this
overcrossing to be in the range of $4.6 million. The Kittelson plan eliminated this
connection due to impacts to the school and the close proximity of the intersections along
72nd Avenue.
Kittelson Plan
The Kittelson plan proposes to construct a C/D system rather than widen the existing two
lane facility.
We estimated the cost to add a C/D system to Hwy 217 from 72nd Ave. north to
Greenburg Road to be in the range of $10 million. This assumes that the 99W
interchange ramps will be reconstructed as shown in the alternative presented in the
Kittelson plan and the improvements will be accommodated for the I-5/Kruse Way
improvements at 72nd Avenue. This cast does not include the interface ramps from
Dartmouth to the C/D. These cost are included in the Dartmouth section.
Dartmouth Improvements
Dartmouth Extension
An LID is currently being prepared to construct Dartmouth to three lanes. The costs
included here do not include the costs to construct the LID project, however, a cost has
been included that will widen Dartmouth to 5 lanes. The Dartmouth costs also include
the structure over Hwy 217 and the extension south to Hall Blvd. We estimated the cost
to construct the Dartmouth extension to be in the range of$8.4 million.
Dartmouth Interface Ramps
These improvements include the on and off ramps from Dartmouth to the C/D system
being proposed on the Kittelson plan for Hwy 217. The estimated costs to construct
these ramps are in the range of$2.5 million.
The cost presented herein do not include such items as Right of Way acquisition and wetland
Page 4
June 25, 1992
PDX31425.AO
mitigation costs. The costs for these items will effect the overall cost of the projects and should
be included prior to developing funding strategies. However, because there is not sufficient
information to prepare these cost at this time the comparison will focus on the construction cost
only.
Costs for ODOT's proposed improvements:
99W - Pfaffel to Commercial $ 4,530,000
99W - I-5 to Pfaffel $ 4,000,000
Hwy 217 $ 7,600,000
Hunziker $ 4,600,000
Total $20,730,000
Costs for Kittelson's proposed plan:
Hwy 217 $10,000,000
Dartmouth Extension $ 8,400,000
Dartmouth Interchange $ 2:600,000
Total $21,000,000
This comparison shows that the cost to construct the Dartmouth extension and the Hwy 217
interface is in the same range of costs for construction as the improvements proposed by ODOT.
One factor this comparison does not show is the comparison of the impacts to businesses and
traffic during and after construction. ODOT's proposed improvements along the 99W corridor
will have a significant impact on the businesses and the traffic. With the Kittelson plan there
will very little disruption to the existing traffic and the impacts to the businesses will be reduced
also. By eliminating the overcrossing from Hunziker to 72nd, the impacts to the school located
adjacent to the Hwy 217 can be reduced also.
r
Page 5
June 25, 1992
PDX31425.A0
This information is presented to assist in your decisions when reviewing and considering the best
transportation system for the Tigard area. If you have any question or concerns please contact
me at 235-5000
Sincerely
CH2M Hill
PeilHandyside, RE .
Project Manager
June 17, 1992 /�" � � JUN 2 6 1992 DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
HIGHWAY DIVISION
Larry Bissett Region 1
Committee for Tigard's Transportation Alternatives - RLE CODE:
11960 S.W. Pacific Highway C603-1457
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Subject: Dartmouth Extension and Collector-Distributor
Interface with Highway 217
I appreciated the opportunity to speak with you and Judy Fessler on April 13, 1992.
In your follow-up letter, dated April 24, 1992, there were several points you
summarized from our meeting. The following is in response to the points you made:
1. We agree that use of collector-distributor roads is a means of avoiding
the construction of a new interchange and, as such, would not conflict
with the spacing standards in the State's interchange policy. Whether
the specific proposal you have in mind "will help rather than hinder the
free flow of traffic on Highway 217" would have to be demonstrated, .
of course, in subsequent analysis.
2. We probably disagree about whether the Dartmouth extension "must be
constructed". Investment priorities and financial capabilities drive
investment decisions every bit as much as analytical mandates such as
the one you quote in the 1988 Tigard Triangle Study.
The simple fact of the matter is that neither ODOT nor the local
jurisdictions within the region are likely to meet all perceived transpor-
tation needs. Metro's Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) projects an
almost 3009o' increase in lane miles of congestion on the regional
system by 2005. Given the region's response to the Transportation
Planning Rule, the Clean Air Act and ISTEA funding flexibility,
highway investment may lag further behind traffic congestion as the
region attempts to become less au to dependent.
3,4. While we agree the Dartmouth extension diverts traffic off a portion o ;
99W, Tigard, Metro and ODOT must consider the future of this facilit
9002 SE McLoughlin
Milwaukie,OR 97222
(503)653-3090
734-1850(Rev.3-91) FAX(503) 653-3267
• t WIrIiJ
in a broader context than that of just the Tigard triangle. The full
range of options need to be considered in a regional context as some
of these options (e.g.,Barbur Blvd.LRT) may be competing for limited
investment dollars. Again, the need for a broader subarea analysis
under Metro's auspices is a logical next step. Whether it can or should
be undertaken prior to some resolution to the Region 2040 process is
another question.
5,6. We agree that your proposal would require some changes to the design
of the I-5 @ 217/Kruse Way Interchange project. As you mentioned
in your letter, these changes may include relocating the Hunziker Road
overcrossing of Highway 217 and lengthening the spans for the 72nd
Avenue overcrossing.
We have split the I-5 @ 217/Kruse Way Interchange project into two
construction phases due to funding limitations. While Phase 1
construction is scheduled to begin in 1995, Phase 2 is not yet scheduled
for construction, and probably will not be constructed until at least
2002. It turns out that both the Hunziker Road structure and the 72nd
Avenue structure are Phase 2 construction items. Final design for these
structures and other Phase 2 items will not be done until a couple of
years prior to the construction year. F
This gives you a window of opportunity to work with Tigard and
Metro to have your proposal included in the RTP. Should the
Dartmouth Extension and related C-D road network on Highway 217
be included in the RTP, then we can modify our final design as
appropriate to match the RTP.
We appreciate the effort you and others have made in developing alternatives for
transportation in Tigard. I encourage you to continue in your efforts and to work
with Tigard and Metro in getting your proposal included in the RTP.
Michal Wert
Project Development Manager
MW:po
cc: Dave Williams
Ted Keasey
Judy Fessler - Tigard City Council
99W Task Force
Q-
> y t< SOS
rr
D
RD
LO
SCHOLLS
PPS
�R
D
DURHAM RD
BLV
TUACATIN
TUALATIN
RD
RD
� BORLAND
SHERWL70D cz RD
RD TUALASI Y-205
EDY RD
4
ST Approx. Lim/l
CITY OF TIGARD _ s
o a
__off' propo3�d
Stid-�rPa Study
ENGINEERING
DVG NAME 'VIC-TIG'
7-15-92 JWL
7-116 - 9z