03/26/1985 - Packet ~
'
TIGARD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
AGENDA
Tuesday, March 26, 1985
7:30 A.M. , Pioneer Pies
1. Minutes of February 10, 1985 — Review and Approve
2. Central Business District Target Area Discussion
— History of the TURA Program
— Zoning of the Area
— Issues
— Parking
— Traffic
— Public Improvements
— Committee Involvement
3 . Developer Presentations
— J. B. Bishop — Main Street
4. Review of Current Economic Development Projects
5. Other Business
6. Next Meeting Date — April 16' 1085
7. Adjourn
(1096P)
°
TIGARD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
Minutes — February 10, 1985
7:30 A.M. — Pioneer Pies Restaurant
MEM8ERS PRESENT: Bruce Clark, Chairman
Jim Corliss
Tony 0rlan6ini
MEMBERS ABSENT: Pat Kennedy
John Cook
Greg Newton
Amo D. Bernar6io
STAFF/QUESTS: Bill Monahan
Randy Clarno
Iry Larson
Geraldine Ball
Jeanne Caswell' Tigard Chamber
Chairman Clark called the meeting to order at 7,39 A.M. A quorum was not
preoent. Minutes of the January 19, 1.985 meeting were reviewed and approved
as submitted with one correction.
Bruce initiated a discussion on the need to designate specific activities for
the Committee to be engaged in during 1985. Amo had suggested that the
Committee choose a project which it can accomplish during the year. Gill ran
through the progress of the Committee to (late in addressing the work program
of the action plan. Bruce suggested that staff bring resource informatiwn,
such as land use maps, zoning maps, etc. to the Committee no that the
Committee may become more familiar with the needs of the target areas. The
Committee may wish to determine what in the community' s opinion can and should
occur in terms of economic development. Tony suggested that the Committee may
wish to contact major property owners to find out what they intend to do with
their land; do they have interest in working with the Committee, and what can
the Committee do to help. The resource leads may be able to assist in
contacting property owners.
The Committee than discussed the four target areas and the resources which are
available to properly evaluate them. After much discussion, the Committee
chose to concentrate initially on the central business district. The reasons
for the selection were the existence of an urban renewal plan adopted there
years ago (since repealed by the voters), and interest expressed by property
owners to review the zoning and land use designations in the area.
Other reasons for the selections are: Good background data exists, ueveral
resource leads have been identified in the area, and the area needs some
attention as positive changes are not taking place. At the next meeting' Bill
will present the oentral business plan no that the Committee can evaluate
whether the plan conforms with the Committee' s ideas about economic
development. At a follow--up meeting, the Committee will invite property
owners to give their input.
^
Randy Clarno' Engineering Division Supervisor, then discussed the the City's
plan to develop a geographic information system, which will maintain land
information which is now difficult to access for developers. The City's
Master Computer plan will be completed shortly which will allow the City to
choose at system for purchase or lease with a summer delivery date. Randy
indicated that he would prefer to utilize a pilot area to test the system.
Jeanne Caswell discussed Gov. Atiyeh' o proponal to use potential lottery
revenueu. His proposal would dedicate 1% of the funds to Chambers of Commerce
for economic development purposes. A pool would be developed which would be
distributed to successful grant applicants. It could be in place by January
1, 198V Tigard'o Committee could put together a cooperative application with
the Chamber.
There were no developer applications. Bill gave an overview of the present
development activities and discussed the final 1984 list of commercial and
industrial projects.
The next meeting of the Committee will be held on Tuesday, March 26' 1085, at
7:30 A.M. at Pioneer Pies. The meeting will be one week later than usual.
(WAM:6r/1035P)
March 10' 1985
Dear :
The Tigard Economic Development Committee has decided to take a look at the
Central Business District (CBD) to determine what role, if any, the Committee
can play in its economic renuwal.
Initially, the Committee will review the urban renwal plan which was prepared
in 1981 for the TURA (Tigard Urban Renewal Agency) and become familiar with
the problems of the area. The Committee is concerned that the downtown area
is not undergoing the same level of economic recovery which is occurring in
other sections of the City .
After the introductory discussion on the CBD is held on Tuesday, March 26,
1985, at 7:30 A.M. at Pioneer Pies, I expect that the Committee will spend
several months evaluating the following:
1. Public improvement needs
2. Traffic flow
2 . Parking availability
4. Development standards required by the City
5. Zoning and allowed land uses
If you would like to attend the meeting on March 26, please notify Billie
Rawlings of my offico at 639-4171' Ext. 22. Your input as a concerned
property owner and business person in the downtown area is welcomed and
encouraged.
Sincerely,
William A. Monahan,
Director,
Community Development
(WAM:br/1077P)
Reino Tarklainen
9475 SW Oak
Portland, Oregon 07223
Robert Randall Co.
9500 S.W. Barbur Blvd. , Suite 300
Portland, OR 97219
Bill McMonagle
Harris.-..McMonagle Associates
8905 S.W. Commercial St.
Tigard, Oregon 07223
Robert Pierce
CLU and Associates
0400 SW Barnes #309
Portland' Oregon
John Savory
Southwest Office Supply
12245 SW Main Street
Tigard' Oregon 97223
Dick Ka6el
Tigard Auto Body
8960 SW Commercial. Street
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Julie Hahola
Jerry' s Hair Design
12380 SW Main Street
Tigard' Oregon 97223
Patrick J. Furrer
9185 SW Burnham
Tigard' Oregon 97223
Bob Santee, Administrator
8841 SW Commercial. Street
Tigard' Oregon 97223
Tom Brian
The Toxin Company
8858 Sw Center Court
Tigard' Oregon 97223
J. B. Bishop
3604 S.E. Oak
Portland' Oregon 97214
Davis Cabinet and Store Fixtures
8975 0.W. Burnham Street
Tigard, Oregon 97223
'
Bark-Well Products, Inc.
9117 S.W. Burnham Street
Tigard' Oregon 97223
Familian Northwest
9110 S.W. Burnham Street
Tigard' Oregon 97229
Stevens Marine
0180 S.W. Burnham Street
Tigard' Oregon 97223
Modern Plumbing Co.
0045 S.W. Burnham Street
Tigard' Oregon 97223
General Telephone Co.
12460 S.W. Main Street
Tigard' Oregon 97223
H and A Construction
91.1.5 S.W. Burnham Street
Tigard' Oregon 97223
(1U80P)
U. S. National Bank
Eldon Meyer
12160 SW Main Street
Tigard' Oregon 97223
Insurance Associates
Bill Bur-ton
12501 SW Main Street
Tigard' Oregon 97223
Norris, Beggs, and Simpson
Jack Gallagher
720 SW Washington
Portland, Oregon 97201
John Judge Plumbing
P.O. Box 23934
Tigard, Oregon 07229
Sam Gotter Realtors
Dun Jaehrling
12996 SW Pacific Hwy .
Tigard' OR 07223
Gary Ott
9076 SW Edgewood
Tigard' Oregon 97223
Prairie Market
8050 SW Commercial
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Computerland
12020 SW Mai Street
Tigard, Oregon 97223
Dale Construction Co.
12360 SW Main St.
Tigard' Oregon 07223
Drinkwater Construction
0205 SW Burnham
Tigard' Oregon 97213
Tigard Computer Supplies
12549 SW Main Street
Tigard' Oregon 97223
Reese C. Kennedy
12170 SW Main Street
'Tigard, Oregon 97223
Pro Grass
9015 8W Burnham Street
Tigard' Oregon 97223
Dear Sir_
Crow Engineering
12420 SW Main Street
Tigard, Oregon 07223
Dear Mr. Crow_
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
RESOURCE LEADS
-- - -
--CENTRAL -BUSINESS DISTRICT
1� Eldon Meyer US National Bank 639-7611
Q 12160 SW Main Street
�a
Bill Burton Insurance Associates 639-1126
12501 SW Main Street
Jack Gallagher Norris, Beggs, and Simpson 223-7181
i
G� 720 SW Washington
Portland, Oregon 97201. j
I
John Judge John Judge Plumbing 620-7289
i � PO Box 23934
i
j Don Jaehrling Sam Gotter Realtors 639-1111
12995 SW Pacific Hwy . '
Tigard Triangel --------- ----- ----
Iry Larson 11720 SW 68th 639-1497
Geraldine Ball 11515 SW 91st Ave. 639-2900
CASCADE
Ann Shell Center for Employment Training 620-7575
10500 SW Cascade Blvd.
Kathy Reed E. Lee Robinson Construction 639-8021
PO Box 23248 Tigard 97223
Irwin Schimmel Power Rents 620-1235
10380 SW Cascade Blvd.
John Door Beaverton — Tigard Insurance 684-0360
9770 SW Shady Lane
Don Mack Tigard Times 684-0360
9730 SW Cascade Blvd .
72nd
Rod Porter Rod Porter Imports 620-2191
16735 SW 72nd 97224
OTHERS
Robert Luton Tualatin Development Co. 639-3101
15300 SW 116th Ave. 97224
1052P
dmj
^
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIQARD, OREGON
TO: Members of the Economic Development Committee March 8' 1085
FROM: W. A. Monahan, Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Next Meeting - Central Business District Review
At our last meeting, the Committee voted to begin a review of the Central
Business District (CBD) to determine what steps should be taken to increase
the economic viability of the area. The Committee will begin to review the
CBD at the March 26 meeting. To help you become familiar with the target
area, the following are enclosed:
1. Minutes of the February 10 meeting.
2. Tigard Urban Renewal. Agency - Report prepared by a
consultant in 1081 for the formation of an urban
renewal agency.
3 . # description of Tax Increment Financing. This was
the funding method chosen for, the project which was
later defeated in 1083 by the voters.
4. Section 10.66 of the Tigard Community Development
Code - CBD Zoning. This describes the uses allowed
in the CBD and the restrictions on development.
5. Working Paper #7 - In 1983' TURA hired a consultant,
Lyle Stewart, to update the TURA plan and prioritize
the public improvement needs. This list shows the
projects chosen for fun6ing before the voters
eliminated the City' s ability to utilize tax
increment financing.
6. A March 5, 1.995 article about our upcoming
meeting.
Although the gregoniwy article focused on the issue of whether or not
industrial uses should be allowed in the area, there are other issues which
the Committee should consider, such as:
1. Public Improvement Needs
2. Adequacy of Downtown Parking Facilities
3 . Traffic Flow
4. Railroad Tracks
5. Aooemm to Highway 99
6. Development Standards for the Downtown Area
'
I hope that the materials which I have provided adequately present the issues
so that you will he prepared to discuss the issue on the 26th. At that
meeting, I expect several downtown property owners to attend and give their
input as to what the existing problems are.
I will present maps and an overview for you at the meeting as an introduction
to the issues. I look forward to meeting with you on the 26th.
COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY CALANDAR YEAR 84-85
POTENTIAL
MONTH APPLICANT USE ADDRESS VALUATION SQ FOOT
Mar. 84 W. Bremer Hotel 10830 SW Greenburg $ 750,000 29,970
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apr. 84 John Poorman Dairy Queen 13165 SW Pac. Hwy. $ 150,000 3,250
Apr. 84 Schucks Auto Auto Supply 13145 SW Pac. Hwy. $ 160,000 4,890
Apr. 84 Bedford Prop. Retail Store 13185 SW Pac. Hwy. $ 142,000 5,667
Apr. 84 Southland 7-11 13285 SW Pac. Hwy. $ 60,000 2,400
$ 512,000
--------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
June 84 Time Oil Conv. Store 15900 SW Upper Bn. $ 75,000 2,720
June 84 PD Weigel Office Bldg. 6645 SW Hampton $ 250,000 7,200.
June 84 George Killian Comm. Center 15995 SW 72nd $ 450,000 27,350
775,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -
July 84 Westwood Retail Store 11705 SW Pac. Hwy. $ 746,000 26,240
July 84 Westwood Rax Restaurant 11701 SW Pac. Hwy. $ 207,000 3,550
$ 953,000
-------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------
Aug. 84 Hall Baptist Church 14125 SW Hall Blvd $ 220,000 8,162
Aug. 84 Roger Belanich One Story Bldg. 10765 SW Greenburg $ 101,00 5,760
Aug. 84 Pac Trust Comm. Building 16250 SW Upper Bn. $ 651,000 38,300
Aug. 84 Pac Trust Comm. Building 16505 SW 72nd $ 826,000 48,612
1,798,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sept. 84 Trammell Crow Tilt-Up Bldg. 11950 SW Garden P1 $ 788,800 46,400
Sept. 84 Joseph Hogan Shell Only 11225 SW Greenburg $ 51,000 2,950
Sept. 84 Sentrol Inc. Tilt-Up Bldg. 10575 SW Cascade $ 999,600 58,800
1,839,400
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oct. 84 George Mull Industrial 9738 SW Tigard St. $ 80,000 3,547
Oct. 84 The Dunham Comm./Pro. Bldg 12725 SW 66th Ave. $ 900,000 28,750
$ 980,000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nov. 84 Robinson Deve. Shell Only 7360 SW Hunziker $ 261,000 12,997
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dec. 84 Jerry Kolve Shell Only 14297 SW Pac. Hwy. $ 36,000 1,220
Dec. 84 Gr. West Chem Shell Only 11440 SW Tiedeman $ 249,000 16,974
285,000
TOTAL. . . . $8,153,400 385,709
(0590P)
f Jal;Uit 10.16,'1985:
ge One '3
Ys{r t- -�!� y..y�
- Continued growth`ezpede
you'-9ke contacts,"Erickson said -
_y Greeley, executive director
of.the-sc!"said participants in the R
resident �>o are chosen because ped",_
. ,p•"gram .n.,,a>,� n %N ,t A r an F?7 -'�M�C �,-.
'they8re artists working an"ty��e�lead- _ ,��,�3 �� Q.�. -,���,, ,,�� �
b>S�QgeOf.their°crait; ' � �.w � .i.r�w`r w I R �rrw�.�.�� �R�«.v, t" �Y •.
perlriienting-" ` MARS JO'ftIVSO1N' �obahan predi .,
By The Triangle has seen small action so far, he
The 10%-month program also con- :Ot the Times -< said.`But`a couple of major projects seem too be on
tributes to the excitement of the the horizon."
school's permanent staff,she said. TIGARD—New building activity,boomed in Ti- - Monahan also said commercial development
gard in 1984 ,-::;;with neva commercial/Industrial
Several who have gone throughconstriction increasing by 300 percent over 1983-- may in one of three large Pacific Highway
the program are really going out and
„ and city planners are expecting another big year. areas owned by real estate investor JB Bishop.The
making waves in the world, she add- areas are along,Main Street in dowtown Tigard,
ed. "There's an intellectual stimula "I think'we saw that lot of pent-up demand for near Park Street on the east side of Pacific Highway
tion.Our faculty gets new-ideas(from commercial office space finally hit in 1984;' said (nicknamed Tigard West), and on land now occu-
the residents) and it filters down to Community Development Director Bill Monahan." pied by the Family Drive-In(Tigard East).
the students." The,biggest trend was noted In construction of
Currently,the school-has about$00 new commercial/industrial buildings, also are planned,Monahan said.Monahan Expansions of Kola and st business parks
students. Student population is mixed said. Tigard-recorded 24 new projects for 1984, "And they-bringtYPe
in the of business that is
half and half,between day and eve-. °. compared to only eight projects-in.1983:Ia"total,45
ning. About one third of the students commercial projects, which include annexations very desirable for Tigard;' Monahan said. "They
hope to become professional artists and building improvements, were started in 1984 rent to small, starting businesses which eventually
while the rest are taking classes with compared to 16 in 1983. move out to find more _space. And, hopefully,
they've found that they've liked Tigard and decide
less.amibitipus goals.,. About 35 fewer single-family dwellings were con- to stay in the city." -
Greeley sai&it is not tnie that the structed 19W-*year than'in 1983,big an increase;in" •,
schooEdate:s only to advanced artists. construc tion of multi-famlty units, Tigard wto Areas of;.concera, according-to Monahan- in.
Beginners make up a large portion of tai of 275 residential,projects Initiated in 1984 (195 elude the Summerfield shopping center,which has
the earollment,.she said. 'single-family'and_80 multi-family.units).About.2.50. a number of vacant store spaces,and a few unused
` residences began construction in 1983 .(230 singe-> ustrial buildings scattered throughout town."
.There are courses.in dralv�ng and
family and about 20 multi-family): f"But we really.don't have vacant commercial
tv,.and eidtle sictal,Aho- Total•valuation -of all projects in '1984 was office spaceln Tigard,"he said
3 W,776,912,; while-;.1983's .value wag set•;:,at Monahan,"expects 1985 commercial Industrial
of tri 'departments $23,282,315,—:representing about W20 percent gain. growth to be as good or better than 1984, single-
A&I now 1s "drawing'`and design,". family dwellings should show the same amount of
Greeley said: "?hat's going great ' "We had already passed 1983s valuation by Oc- growth as the past year, and the city may have a
` tober,'MonalM,said.
s � •,. . � <, � "real surge" in the construction of multi-family
Ste':
Thereare =stiidents,'�i�e it high Commercial,areas, such.as 72nd,Avenue and units.
school age thr6uA,-retirement„rTbis Cascade Boulevard, had new bu§inessim,move in, a 1984'multi-family ledger sheet included only
winter,several chlldt+en's courses will Monahan said, but most of the;aesv"growth.,was .one'entry'-' an 80-unitcondominium being built by
be added to the in j spread out along Padric Highways ��We111ngfoa EntefpriW near'Bull Mountain,
f ic. �.
Children's courses_titdttde Much of the new office spacealreadylias been "Thifii probably the fir `multi-fami-
p painting, Bred through.; sold or leased.Monahan said,rev�rsing a past trend ly protect we've had is three years,"Monahan said.
«�
three; drawing; grades " ongh,W,V_ by developers to construct new offices I ,I spat~ A plotentisi 500 multi-family units could begin con-
eight, mural - u tion. i s"stradion la'the next year,he added.Scheduled for
thr°u$h=�sixr , . 8ltuation is more realtic (than'in" the' construction`are three new complexes, including a
�hrbe OO %kque §tj`f Moael>ga ltd. "The fact the space-Is sold' 304-unit"condominium to be built behind the Green-
-
three xm► � oCSnrt•ralli4 f �e!topes that a recovery may be way Town Center by S&J Properties.
iag.
n4 mixed media scillpu+e, eS
hap¢enIttells >3 recovery ishappening" "We're looking for a strong 1985,"Monahan said.
our through silt. '`"
hl `.oppOitCtnity for future growth Is Ie" '`Business people I think are more optimistic about
Err 1116 it fo and the Tigard Triangle area once a local improvement the economy.They're more willing to develop now
or,61
etdde3at ISnpejt .r dtsbrld al�Dartmouth Avenue Is settled; than they have been in the past few years.",
`"WE .stcpped children's ;caasses; , "'
hen vee moYed here in 1979.because -
ae didn't have proper space,"Greeley
"We put children's copses onihe' �
-or t ebutwem an have hada!ot°bffequest 1JU�: LOVE BRAND X BUYERS
or thein and are.able.to o�fer'them `
tow."
,, WhenIt comes to the purchase of a home-satellite
� /�system we love those buyers who made some
�# teal,detil" rf a Brand X system.
.Jicawh No USPS 092-440
PuWished> •rWThey,re the unhappy ones who come into our store
-Times PuaishlCornp".
PrPresidentnp E"6M.Dakar ' . not long after they purchased their Brand X system
Secrstary/Treasursr :,..
.u�anemmookl � .;;-.y at a dirt Cheap price somewhere else.
Office: 9730 sw cascade 01vd
-Tigard,OR 97223. ti
Man,;g, ,, .{ y We appreciate their:lst`time purchase getting them
P.O.Box 370, � `6hnnkArl" nn n cntallitn TV Rr it n^%Ar
FtAmvnrt x OR a7mF
neip tnem. un 1—7—dyb d«u •"u— F--J-`- - __� reer,among orner career options. help with reading one day a weeF
days,when he's not here I try to plan one learn something," he said. "I'm
thlrx v'ha whole group can do togeth- planning to come back next semester, "I'm using this year to decide what Hours would be 10-11 a.m. on Mot
" too.I likr kids." school and what field continue In," days or Tuesdays.Also needed is cler
er
Continued from Page One
rDIEY
Counc* lo
tr accused of being anti-progres• He also suggests that the city de- once-friendly relationship. But he's
sive,and helping to divide Tigard. partment budgets on each ballot to kept his respect for Scheckla.
"I don't think that's fair,"Scheckla determine support for individual pro- "Ken represented a distinct point
said. "I'm not against anything But I grams — such as the library and of view for many people in the corn-
voted the way I felt was right.I voted parks. munity," Jean says. "He and (former
the way I felt the people wanted me to "We are hurting our own process mayor) Wilbur Bishop (who also was _
vote.I'm not a part of any group,and I by not looking at another way of oper- given a plaque of appreciation Mon-
did not represent anyone — except sting services,"he says. day night) have been controversial,
the community. Scheckla says he has never sought but both always had Tigard's best in-
"I don't feel I've been a deterrent publicity for his positive work on the ,�
terest at heart. _
to anything,"he adds."I thought I just council but added he feels he has "I enjoyed talking to Ken head-to- f Wit# .,
brought forward what people were been unfairly treated in Tigard Times head about issues, he adds. "I'hope -
saying. I want livability and responst-, editorials. The editorials criticized that Ken and I might be able to re-
ble growth." several of his
decisions and his atten- sume our friendship now'that there
Scheckla did not support two 1984 dance at Budget Committee meetings. aren't pressures from our working re- q. _
city tax base requests,"because I told "I was never contacted by the pa- lationship.
everyone beforehand I didn't think per and asked why I voted a certain Scheckla once sought to limit coon- a '
people would support a tax base high- way," Scheckla says of the editorials, cil members to-two consecutive terata.
er than $1 million. Both measures "or why I was unable to attend meet "A pejo can stay-too long and
($1.3 million last May,and $1.15 mil- ings. But I think I represented the • get too much power,"Scheckla says.'
lion in November) were higher, and community as fair as I could. I think
both failed." the long-time residents understood The change was never approved, '
Eight years on the Budget Commit- that,but people new to the city proba- but Scheckla did not drop his support
tee have shown Scheckla that Tigard bly had a different view of me." of the policy.That is the main reason
needs to restructure its budget proc- Scheckla maintains he's kept his he did not seek re-election to_ the
ess,he says.The suggestion is not new, perspective through the highs and council,he says. ,
but Scheckla says he will leave that as lows of his time on the council. "Right now I just want to watch
advice to the council. "I think people in the city look to Monday night football and play pi-
The burden of trimming programs me as an average type of guy," he nochle," he says. "I want to do some
wi?hin departments should be placed says. "A lot of people have called me of the things with my time I haven't
C partment heads,and not Budget up just to talk to me about issues.And been able to do in the past eight
C.-..mittee members,Scheckla says. one thing I've done,I've always given years."
them an answer. And it may not be But,one day,he may decide to run
"Department heads should be the answer they want to hear. I've for City Council again,or even mayor.
made more accountable," he says. never ducked an issue.
"They have the expertise. They "(Running for mayor)hasn't been
"I feel very good about the way I a goal for me," Scheckla says with a
should determine what to do with
what the budget committee gives represented the city,"he adds. smile. "But there's always an option I
them.And if they can't live within that City Administrator Bob Jean, who may run for council or mayor. But I
budget,then they should be called out often has been at odds with Scheckla, wouldn't want to get anybody's hopes
on the carpet." said differences have strained their up."
committee to elect new officers
TIGARD — Members of the Ti- Monahan staff guest of the commit- Dec. 18 meeting:
gard Economic Development Com- tee. • Members emphasized the
mittee will elect new officers during The committee and the chamber need for clear communication early
a Tuesday,Jan. 15 meeting. may consider sponsoring a half-day in the planning process between city
The meeting will begin at 9:30 seminar for Realtprs, Monahan staff and developers to avoid extra
a.m. at Pioneer Pies Restaurant, said.At the seminar;Realtors could development costs or delays.
11960 S.W.Pacific Highway.New of- learn more about the city's develop-
ficers will include a new chairman ment codes, activities, comprehen- The committee received a re-
to replace Mark Padgett. Padgett is sive plan,and special areas such as of the port from Pam Ragsdale, president
onomic
not seeking reappointment those which deal with neighborhood Development ttCorporation,n Valley cwho is
Committee members met with groups' organizing a 24-page insert for the
local Realtors during their Dec. 18 The seminar also could include ;March 1985 edition of Oregon Busi- ""'
-specific cels of okt center,Imo.
meeting. suggestions,,of-spec par mess Magazine.The insert.-which al-
"We found that the Realtors real= land that may be donsidered for re= so will be sent to 500 Japanese corn-
ly wanted n be kept up to date on designation in the city's comprehen- panies, will advertise the Tualatin BEAVERTON ARE;
ly w land is available in the cityn sive plan and zoning maps. Valley region to attract business in-
Tigard Planning Director Bill In other discussion during the terest. 10445 S W Canyon
uitPEOPLE classified 641-880
read 684-0360 Now over 1,800 loc
T I G A R D WATER DISTRICT 6841 S. W. COMMERCIAL ST.
TIGARD.OREGON 97223-6290
PHONE (503) 639-1554
March 8 , 1985
To: Bruce Clark
Chairman
Tigard Economic Development
Advisory Committee
From: Administrator
Tigard Water District
Subj : Zoning of Air-King Site
Enclosed are extracts (pages 7 - 10) of my report for the
regular meeting of the Board of Commissioners to be held on
March 12, 1985 .
Please take these comments into consideration when making
a recommendation for rezoning the downtown Tigard area .
Thank you.
Robert E. Santee
---- cc: Bill Monahan
Bill McMonagle
TIGARD WATER DISTRICT
8841 S. W. COMMERCIAL
TIG.ARD, OREGON D72M
ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued)
11. Zoning of Air-King Site .
Several months ago the board placed the matter of zoning
for construction of a new Operations Center on the "back-burner"
because there was . no urgency. The district will not be in a
financial position to construct the new center until July 1,
1989 , four (A) years from now.
Now comes an article in THE OREGONIAN, dated March 5, 1985,
copy of which is enclosed, pertaining to this zoning. It appears
that Councilman Tom Brian (City of Tigard) has made a sensible
judgment on the matter. On the other hand, the beliefs of other
individuals are surprising.
One has to accept the area as it is and what has been
approved (by the city) in the past, along S . W. Burnham Street.
One has to wonder if those attempting to make recommendations
have ever driven down that street and observed what is there.
First of all, the northerly boundaries of each lot (on the north)
abut a double set of railroad tracks . How does one improve that
situation? There is no solution to the noise and poor appearance
of the railroad tracks . An unkept berm exists between the tracks .
How does one beautify a boxcar, camped for extended periods of
time on a railroad siding? One must accept the fact that the
railroad tracks running through the center of town detract from
the entire downtown area. What can be done about it? Nothing.
One has to wonder if anyone, in authority, has ever looked
behind the existing buildings along Burnham Street. A cursory
examination this date revealed the following:
a. Famili.an Northwest: Outside storage of about 500 fiber-
glass shower stalls and bathtubs, plus tons of PVC pipe .
(The appearance is horrendous) .
b. Stevens Marine: Outside storage of pleasure boats, all
crammed together.
c . Modern Plumbing: Outside storage of PVC pipe and bath-
tubs . Large area is used as a dump for used hot water
tanks . Fiberglass insulation is all over . (A disgrace-
ful scene) .
-7-
ADMINISTRATOR' S REPORT (Continued)
d. H & A Construction: Outside storage of lumber and
plywood, apparently left-over from many construction
projects.
e. City of Tigard Public Works: Mass outside parking.
for vehicles and equipment. Outside storage of PVC
pipe, concrete manholes, etc .
f. General Telephone: Outside storage of reels of cable,
telephone poles, PVC pipe, with carport for vehicles.
(Everything very neat and in its place) .
The idea and belief that this area will eventually consist
of beautiful hi-tech, professional offices and buildings is un-
realistic and illogical. Presently, there are small shops and
offices for plumbing, electrical, automotive, etc . , along with
a liquor store and a garage storage area . Probably the most
beautiful building in the downtown area is the General Telephone
structure (even with outside storage in the rear) .
Our concept to what downtown Tigard should look like in the
future is, perhaps, vastly different than envisioned by others .
And, after all, any citizen is entitled to his or her viewpoint
on this matter, not just the elected or appointed officials.
Tigard needs identity. The new Civic Center, supported and
approved by the citizens at the polls, is an excellent beginning.
We will have a new city hall, library, and police station.
Finally, the city will have someplace to call "home" .
Upon considering the purchase of the Air-King site for the
future headquarters for TWD, former editor Richard Nokes (on the
budget committee) wrote the following: (excerpts) (.April 2, 1984)
"I am intrigued by the recommendation that the water
district establish its headquarters on the Air-King site.
This, coupled with the city hall - library - police station
move to an adjacent tract, would effectively move "downtown"
Tigard from Tigard to what we used to know as Treece. That
used to be the name of the flagstop at that point on the
old Oregon Electric Line when I was a tad .
-8-
ADMINISTRATOR' S REPORT (Continued)
It would be the second move of "downtown Tigard"
in its history. The original town was Ti.gardville and
centered roughly on McDonald and Pacific Highway. With
the advent of the railroads, the Tigard center shifted
north to the vicinity of the Tigard Feed Store .
I note that you are requesting a recommendation
from our (:budget) committee to budget $50, 000 for down
payment on the site . I applaud this site for future
use of the water district. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "
A birdeye perspective of the proposed Operations Center
has been shown before and copies are enclosed. Large prints
of this facility are posted in the administrative office .
We have heard many, many compliments from the public on the
proposed design and location of this facility. There have
been no adverse comments .
Not only is the Air-King site ideal for the water district
to perform its primary function but its location takes in a
broader scope in that it will become a component part of the
larger civic center area. The location is in close proximity
to the new civic center . A future office building (as noted
on the drawing) could possibly be a justice court. (city hall annex?)
This centralized, one-stop arrangement of public facilities
has been the dream of most municipal planners. We believe it to
be a logical, realistic dream, and attainable .
From the beginning I envisioned a more extensive development
of the civic center area. Between city hall and the water dis-
trict I visualized a beautifully landscaped area (with trees and
water fountains) and covered passageways . On several occasions
I have expressed my disappointment to the city staff (Bill
Monahan) that the city allowed the former owner of the property,
Mr. Sturgis, to retain one acre of choice land which was a por-
tion of the original tract purchased by the city. At some future
date the city could have condemned and purchased the land where
Tigard Electric and the single family dwelling (on the corner)
are located. This would have provided the open space to give
the whole civic center area the "college campus" appearance and
atmosphere.
-9-
ADMINISTRATOR' S REPORT (Continued)
The fact that the water district desires to store pipe
and fittings outside is not a valid reason for not building
the facility there. Those items can easily be camouflaged
with attractive fencing and arborvitae trees. The storage area
would be behind the building, adjacent to the railroad tracks,
not visible from Burnham Street .
Lastly, one has to observe the track record of the water
district on its facilities elsewhere. There are plenty of
district-owned sites to make a comparison. (7 reservoirs sites) .
Every one of the sites is a credit to the neighborhood . Grounds
are landscaped, beautiful lawns and trees, with automatic irri-
gation systems, etc . Those property owners adjacent to these
facilities often comment about the wonderful neighbor that TWD
is . At any time, .the public is invited to visit the shop area
located on S . W. Canterbury Lane. They will find a most im-
pressive sight with pipe and fittings neatly stacked and trucks
& equipment lined up for inspection (when not in use) .
It is hoped that members of the Tigard Economic Development
Advisory Committee will make a thorough review of the facts and
arrive at realistic zoning for the future development of down-
town Tigard.
Related subject. Construction plans have been prepared and
submitted to the city for approval for half-street improvements
of Hall Boulevard and the most easterly 200 feet of Burnham
Street. The district is not required to do this work, but it is
believed to be a worthwhile project which will benefit everyone
in the community.
Hall Boulevard will be widened to include a deacceleration
lane for turning onto Burnham Street (_from the north) . Burnham
Street will be widened to provide a middle lane for left-hand
turns onto Hall Boulevard. Land will be donated to the state
and city for these improvements, but all construction costs
will be borne by TWD. The existing cyclone fence will be re-
paired and moved back. New curbs and a 5-foot sidewalk will be
installed.
Work is scheduled to begin next month. The project will
certainly improve the appearance of this corner which is pre-
sently an eye-sore.
-10-
all
Its
�,r 'fir'-" •' �� - '-•...�..s*++.+.,+.�.•,�.
_.. - ►a��
�I
_r.s
sp
PROPERTY LINE SCREEN H(DGE
F A
cOy ,1C/
F /c
��♦ FUEL SERVICE Cj•
♦\♦ ISLAND �/C Q<s>
\
/ ♦ 9
i ♦♦♦\ •P9 t O/ ♦ PIPE STORAGE
0 '•
�..; ♦♦ FUTUREBUILDING
♦♦♦ ;9p
PUBLIC
UNLOADING RAMP
\ /
PARKING FOR TRUCKS
• ♦♦�/�'!
"6'
AND EQUIPMENT
`\
\GATE _
SERVICE
BUILDING \
EMPLOY
ARKI G\ �
BG Le. ♦ GATE _ "54REFN WA v \ \
L OFFICE _ �, ••ti'c. E \ \
BUtLA1NG
I m
_ EACCELERATION I \ \
;'.LANE J •`
J Y
O PER AT IONS CENTER +,. �••ti LAWN AREA 1
S I T E P L A N ROPERTY LINE w In
40 60 60
S C A L E: o� f —
• 6: f U•",It(.SETEACKJ
.�_ I 6
e y
(4 ) Except as otherwise provided in Chapter 18 . 90 ,
Building Height Limitations , no building in the C-P zoning
district shall exceed forty-five feet in height.
(5) The maximum site coverage shall be eighty-five per-
cent , including all buildings and impervious surfaces .
(6 ) The minimum landscaping requirement shall be fif-
teen percent . (Ord. 84-30 §2 , 1984 ; Ord. 84-29 §1 (Exhibit A
(part) ) , 1984 ; Ord. 83-52 Exhibit A(part) , 1983) .
18 64 060 Additional requirements . Additional require-
ments for the C-P district are as follows :
(1) Off-street parking and loading, Chapter 18 . 106 ;
(2) Access and egress , Chapter 18 . 108 ;
(3) Landscaping and screening , Chapter 18 . 100 ;
(4 ) Signs , Chapter 18 . 114 ;
(5) Nonconforming situations , Chapter 18 . 132 ;
(6) Sensitive lands , Chapter 18 . 84 . (Ord. 83-52 Exhibit
A (part) , 1983) .
Chapter 18 . 66
CBD (CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT)
Sections :
18 .66 . 010 Purpose .
18. 66 .020 Procedures and approval process .
18 .66 . 030 Permitted uses.
18 . 66 . 040 Conditional use (Chapter 18 . 130) .
18 . 66 . 050 -Dimensional requirements--Nonresidential
uses .
18 . 66 .052 Dimensional requirements--Residential uses--
R-40 .
18 .66 .054 Dimensional requirements--Residential use--
R-12--Special district .
18 . 66 . 060 Additional requirements.
18 . 66 . 010 Purpose . The purpose of the CBD zoning dis-
trict is to provide for a concentrated, central commercial
office and retail area which also provides civic , high-
density residential and mixed uses . (Ord. 83-52 Exhibit
A(part) , 1983) .
18 66 020 Procedures and approval process . (a) A use
permitted outright, Section 18 . 66 . 030 , is a use which requires
no approval under the provisions of this code . If a use is
not listed as a use permitted outright, it may be held to be
a similar unlisted use under the provisions of Chapter 18 . 43 ,
Unlisted Uses .
284 (Tigard 9/84 )
(b) A conditional use , Section 18 . 66 . 040 , is a use the
approval of which is discretionary with the hearings officer .
The approval process and criteria for approval are set forth
in Chapter 18 . 130 , Conditional Uses . If a use is not listed
as a conditional use , it may be held to be a similar unlisted
284-1 (Tigard 9/84 )
1 `cS . Of, . �i �0
use under the provisions of Chapter 18 . 43 , Unlisted Uses .
(Ord . 83-52 Exhibit A (part) , 1983) .
18 . 66 . 030 Permitted uses . Permitted uses in the CBD
district are as follows :
(1) Civic Use Types .
(A) Civic services ;
(B) Community recreation;
(C) Cultural exhibits and library services ;
(D) Lodges , fraternal and civic assembly;
(E) Parking facilities ;
(F) Postal services ;
(G) Public agency administrative services ;
(H) Public safety services ;
(I) Public support facilities .
(2) Commercial Use Types .
(A) Amusement enterprises ;
(B) Animal sales and services :
( i) Grooming ,
(ii) Veterinary, small animals ;
(C) Automotive and equipment :
( i) Cleaning,
(ii) Repairing , light equipment;
(D) Building maintenance services ;
(E) Business equipment sales and services ;
(F) Business support services ;
(G) Communication services;
(H) Convenient sales and personal services ;
(I) Eating and drinking establishments ;
(J) Financial , insurance and real estate services ;
(K) Food and beverage sales ;
(L) Medical and dental services ;
(M) Participation sports and recreation :
( i) Indoor ,
( ii) Outdoor;
(N) Personal services , general ;
(0) Professional and administrative services ;
(P) Repair services , consumer ;
(Q) Retail sales , general;
(R) Transient lodging.
(3) Residential Use Types (See R-40 and R-12 for Develop-
ment Standards) .
(A) Single-family attached residential units ;
(B) Multiple-family residential units .
The CBD zoning district allows for R-40 residential
development except within the area south of Fanno Creek
defined as follows :
285 (Tigard 4/84 )
LiS ut>
All lands bounded by Fanno Creek, Hall Boulevard , Omara,
Ash Avenue and Hill Street within the CBD shall be designated
R-12 PD and shall be developed as planned developments in
conformance with the R-12 district standards . (Ord . 83-52
Exhibit A (part) , 1983) .
18 . 66 . 040 Conditional use (Chapter 18 . 130) . Conditional
uses in the CBD district are as follows :
( 1) Adult entertainment;
( 2) Automotive and equipment sales/retail , light
equipment;
( 3) Day care facilities ;
( 4 ) Utilities ;
( 5) Heliports , in accordance with the Aeronautics
Division (ODOT) and the FAA;
( 6) Hospitals ;
( 7) Spectator sport and entertainment facilities ;
( 8) Group care residential ;
( 9) Vehicle fuel sales ;
(10) Wholesale , storage and distribution;
(11) Commercial parking facilities. (Ord. 83-52
Exhibit A (part) , 1983) .
18 66 050 Dimensional requirements--Nonresidential
uses. Dimensional requirements for nonresidential uses in
the CBD district are as follows :
(1) There are no minimum lot area or lot width require-
ments .
(2) There are no minimum lot width requirements .
(3) There are no setback requirements , except thirty
feet where a commercial use within the district abuts a
residential zoning district .
(4) Except as otherwise provided in Chapter 18 . 98 ,
Building Height Limitations , no building in the CBD zone
shall exceed eighty feet in height .
(5) The maximum height of any building in the CBD zone
within one hundred feet of any residential zoning district
shall not exceed forty feet.
(6) The maximum site coverage shall be eighty-five
percent, including buildings and impervious surfaces .
(7) The minimum landscaping requirement shall be fif-
teen percent. (Ord. 84-29 §l (Exhibit A(part) ) , 1984 ; Ord.
83-52 Exhibit A(part) , 1983 ) .
18 . 66 . 052 Dimensional requirements--Residential uses--
R-40 . Dimensional requirements for residential uses in R-46-
districts in the CBD district are as follows :
(1) There is no minimum lot area per unit.
(2) There is no minimum lot width requirement .
(3 ) The minimum setback requirements are as follows :
(A) The front yard setback shall be a minimum of
twenty feet;
286 (Tigard 9/84 )
(B) On corner and through lots , the minimum setback
for each side facing a street shall be twenty feet ; however ,
the provisions of Chapter 18 . 102 , Visual Clearance Areas ,
must be satisfied ;
(C) The side yard setback shall be a minimum of
ten feet , except as provided in subdivision (E) of this sub-
section;
(D) The rear yard setback shall be a minimum of
twenty feet, except as provided in subdivision (E) of this
subsection;
(E) Where the side yard or rear yard of attached
or multiple-family dwellings abut a more restrictive zoning
district, such setbacks shall not be less than thirty-five
feet;
(F) Front of garage to property line abutting a
public or private street shall not be less than twenty feet .
(4 ) Except as otherwise provided in Chapter 18 . 98 ,
Building Height Limitations , no building in an R-40 zoning
district shall exceed sixty feet in height.
(5) The maximum lot coverage shall be eighty percent ,
including buildings and impervious surfaces .
(6) The minimum landscape requirement shall be twenty
percent. (Ord. 84-29 §1 (Exhibit A(part) ) , 1984 ; Ord . 83-52
Exhibit A (part) , 1983 ) .
18 .66 . 054 Dimensional requirements--Residential use--
R-12--S2ecial district. Dimensional requirements for resi-
dential uses in R-12 or special districts in the CBD dis-
trict are as follows :
(1) There is no minimum lot area per unit.
(2) There is no minimum lot width requirement.
(3) The minimum setback requirements are as follows :
(A) The front yard setback shall be a minimum of
twenty feet;
(B) On corner and through lots , the minimum setback
for each side facing a street shall be twenty feet; however ,
the provisions of Chapter 18 . 102 , Visual Clearance Areas ,
must be satisfied;
(C) The side yard setback shall be a minimum of
ten feet , except as provided in subdivision (E) of this sub-
section;
(D) The rear yard setback shall be a minimum of
twenty feet, except as provided in subdivision (E) of this
subsection ;
(E) Where the side yard or rear yard of attached
or multiple-family dwellings abut a more restrictive zoning
district, such setbacks shall not be less than thirty-five
feet;
(F) Front of garage to property line abutting a
public or private street shall not be less than twenty feet.
(4 ) Except as otherwise provided in Chapter 18 . 98 ,
287 (Tigard 9/84 )
Building Height Limitations , no building in an 1Z-40 zoning
district shall exceed sixty feet in height. percent ,
( 5) The maximum lot coverage shall be eighty p
including buildings and impervious surfaces .
(6) The minimum landscape requirement shall be twenty
percent. (Ord . 84-29 §1 (Exhibit A(part) ) , 1984 ; Ord . 83-52
Exhibit A (part) , 1983 ) .
18 - 66 . 060 Additional requirements . Additional require-
ments in the CBD district are as follows :
(1) Off-street parking and loading, Chapter 18 . 106 ;
(2) Access and egress , Chapter 18 . 108 ;
(3) Landscaping and screening , Chapter 18 . 100 ;
(4 ) Signs , Chapter 18 . 114 ;
(5) Nonconforming situations , Chapter 18 . 132 ;
(6) Sensitive lands , Chapter 18 . 84 . (Ord. 83-52
Exhibit A(part) , 1983) .
Chapter 18 . 68
I-P (INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT)
Sections :
18 . 68 . 010 Purpose .
18 . 68 . 020 Procedures and approval process .
18 . 68 .030 Permitted uses .
18 . 68 .040 Conditional use (Chapter 18 . 130) .
18 . 68 .050 Dimensional requirements .
18 . 68 . 060 Additional requirements .
18 . 68 . 010 Purpose . The purpose of the I-P zoning
district is to provide areas :
( 1) For combining light manufacturing , office and
complementary related commercial uses , e .g. , restaurant,
barber shop, beauty salons and fitness centers ;
( 2) For combining uses which have no off-site impacts
in terms of noise , odor, glare , lights , vibration, smoke ,
dust or other types of off-site impacts;
( 3) For combining parking, landscaping and other design
features and which physically and visually link structures
and uses within one development;
( 4 ) Which prohibit residential uses ;
( 5) Which utilize a basic street and utility pattern
which will permit flexibility in the size of industrial
sites ;
( 6) Which provide for a circulation system that pro-
vides direct access to arterials or collectors that will not
channel traffic through residential areas ;
288 (Tigard 9/84 )
Grow stu ies zoning
i .��:; {hI :Tigard.�, ...ov�rr t
By N pltltw there,similar to the Koll Busi-.i
cast . ''4 r,,.;. nes�Park.'`,
jjdARD ��WbethCr the entire "I strongly supported the area being
downtown commercial area should be zoned commercial business at one time
preserved as the'city's hub or If part because I had high hopes for it to be
should be turned into,'light-industrial developed Into a viable commercial
area:ts a hot potato i�'t to be tossed area,"he said.
oaw the political table, Brian, who is a commercial and In-
be Tl#ard Economic Development dustrial real estate broker,listed sever
,kfVi ry.am"i is'dedded':to bite.' al reasons why he's changed his mind:
int0i the.me of downtown`zoning in -The land pattern is a patchwork
U*February and,adopted the subject of separate ownership and it would be
&so1)?85 goa according to.Chairman costly and time-consuming for a devel-
Br Clark.• e'oommittee;will talk oper to buy enough pieces to knit to-
f6jukfi}s•pe* '4e (dents and ofti-; $ether a commercial development site.
Gala starting ch 26 And bring its -Most businesses.in the area are
recommendations,to• th ;t-ouncil later.--`not strictly commercial:Businesses in-
thls years-R ,ern �, i elude several automobile repair shops,
t> !t e p changethQ W11�tgpge_area and several con
Zo&g4bf+a �+6�the dty'a( ruction.dompapies yyjth equip.�ent. i
bu •
1$'4ae tett 1@4i*dtstrltt Into; atbrage `; r
IlAt-lndtit 1 'area 'according to ''�-yTlie' oan Pforliid an
f3o n Brtan:'fhe dlsirict Js &bk_renewal dlstrictlnt1881'to revs.
llslreeta m talize the:downto4wAtArealbut voters
aan tp* ►e�s abplisbed,.the X983 t
11nC11YCf0d t0
s do x i ! 'build ClL ant Creek Park'
¢( ' ` rene '` O�renoVitle on all 6lebalr$; not in'the core
- oma "the 2prgely a ' dGtO .. tr .it could I>aNe been an
h of'cot'porate'pfilce,bdild� ,pan or A downfovt%n Ide
;t pf'Tots iud stmt{repair shops: p A.'5=afire paicel on'H41 Boule-
,- ot.the CO!!�ttee's explore. ;Ward and Burghun Street was recently I
eta are reYle*ing the tubae `Sold to the'flgard Water District, 1
�
I and ther; aw*!twiilch_ p,1ths,to pUt its main office
`'y i _ $b it,lhZ°atea't jgtory: id` -building:arld eggipment yard there- Ii
the property wodldhaDi bnenrsold'is a'•
4
„k�irrar;shalt mAA of the nod+;,comm9aj.de.� p ,eatzi as said it
gtltt►17 batit.'iwnev�al' Adv! could b>�vo$ftzltct d more doinmercial:
Coiutnittee,*d h U)Mgty o � �develbpinPent vintg ilsvatef�dlgtiic -
` �haiiging tl i g because the ..there wiU hive the oppodte.etfec.L
w';.C1 neetis,to Crean unity:ldett Fitrrer.safd he`�vas also r"5,
ted'.
dbwntowri` geted"the'='that the; 'consider r C [ •U e sprue t ;d wntQw� ,, ,d�
Re aa,,#&I-Age4
tnAntled in'l>.0 s.. ?` . 1, , �ttimitniry,atter=
It would be`fpo don tI Beat, 'd.. the.
'An re4ewal�lan f1V1,tjO1ZW they^;Suar4a, coneld�$,tmmu'IIity i :'1Z6nitiwQrk, ttaJf tiara ciny put Into—so�hllr � t'if really lis.and
lip,tP� _ i- r.icoatrol::tliety Vit-becomes,an
il�,,!M •0�ag e',_ f Ther tormer attractive area,".Brian said.
�? ai agency' "We've seen strong economic devel.
WO lie "stip reed ng'-�wother .opment in the past year in other areas
Amey." cmdna'gle -t'O, ed'rl'evita- of the city. but not in the downtown
ihd, Q• .dock .area," said community development
a' tit P,,, .�oordlt a* for W111iatn,Monahan. "It
fil3riettpossibly shown tn'e there might perhaps be
kidding 1 1 eve this por- something wrong with itbe zoning
tion of the oule be- there:"
came a thrivinedoto ttelie Monahan said that exploring the
ftVlsloned the dtatrfct'dVe'tually fill- Issue would take at leist four months
Ing with small service-oriented buil- before It reaches the Clty Council for
nesses and quiet manufacturing com final consideration.
COUNCIL GOALS AND PRIORITIES
FEBRUARY 20, 1985
1. Complete Performance Audit of Sewer and Storm
Drainage Utilities, and Revise Rates 48
2. Review and Approve Service Level Priorities 45
3. Review and Adopt Merit Pay System 43
4. Initiate Regular informal workshops with _
Council , Departments, and Boards and
Committees (Brunch, Tours, Etc. ) 39
5. Construct Dartmouth Street LID 38
6. Adopt and Implement Computer Master Plan 35
7. Adopt Street CIP 34
8. Establish Council-Community Relations Program 31
9. Complete Traffic Plan Study of Greenburg Road 27
10. Review and Adopt Personnel Rules 23
11. Initiate Pilot Community Recreation Program 14
12. Adopt Park Plan and CIP 9
13. Assume Responsibility for 135th Street LID 5