09/17/1985 - Packet /
TIGARD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
TUESDAY' SEPTEMBER 17, 1085 - 7:30 A.M.
Pioneer Pies
1 . Review minutes of August 20, 1085,
2. Election of Chairperson.
3 . Downtown Improvement Meeting - September 24, 1985, 6:00 P.M.
- Coordination of agenda.
- develop ten key points for discussion.
4. 1085-86 Action Plan Discussion.
- Following the September 16 Council Workshop, the achievable goals of the
Committee for the year.
5. County Fee-Per-Trip Presentation - by Mark Padgett, Washington County
Planning Commissioner.
6. Tigard` s Economic Development Brochure prepared for the Japan-Ammrioan
Conference of Mayors and Chamber of Commerce Preyident' n,
7, Bun Trip to Economic Development Sites - September 19 - 7:30 A.M.
8, Presentations by Developers.
y. Other Business .
10. Adjourn.
(1827P)
'
'
TIGARD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
MINUTES — August 28' 1085
Pioneer Pies Restaurant
Members Present: Tony 0rlan6ini
John Savory
Amo De Bernardio
Susan Clark
Guests Present: Jeanne Caswell
Morgan Caswell
Mary Gross
Carl Johnson
Don Coverdell
Staff Present: Bill Monahan
John Savory acted as chairman of the meeting pending an election in
September. A quorum was not present. Two new members were appointed on
August 10, they are Susan Clark and Dick Cochran.
The minutes of July 16, 1085 were reviewed and accepted with no changes .
Bill reviewed the downtown survey results which revealed that the
greatest concern of property owners and businesses in the downtown area is the
appearance of the area. Publicly owned property was identified an a problem
area as well an private. Amo stated that the City should provide leadership
on improving the appearance of publicly owned properties. Jeanne stated that
the Chamber will take on responsibility for the upkeep of Liberty Park. The
Chamber will begin a program to provide engraved rocks at the park which
signify each of the Chamber' s annual First Citizens.
A discussion was held concerning survey comments on the possibility of
starting a business promotional organization. John felt that there is a need
for such an organization to encourage the upgrading of business. The
Committee discussed the problems associated with absentee landlords and the
need to get them involved in the efforts to improve the area. John stated
that it should not be difficult to get people who work in the area involved.
Don Coverdell, who will be volunteering to help the I-5 Corridor Association,
stated that the survey has great value and should be analyze6. The survey
should be used to prepare an improvement plan.
Carl Johnson, a downtown property owner who completed a survey, asked if
the Main Street Projects had been encouraged by the City. The survey results
showed the need for a shopping center at the south end of Main Street to
anchor the area. John stated that he felt that the City attempted to assist
the developer.
Tony suggested that the Committee set up a follow—up to the discussion
and eurvey . A meeting could be set up where the downtown resource- people
would be invited to participate. Jeanne suggested that a letter be sent to
each property owner using the same list as was used for the survey . In
addition, a cover letter and survey results could be hand delivered to
downtown businesses by Committee members and voluntuero. A meeting then could
be held at the Community Center in downtown.
'
The Committee agreed that a downtown meeting should be held on Tuesday,
September 24` 1085 at 6:00 P.M. at the Community Center. John, Jeanne and
Bill will work to coordinate the meuting. Don suggested that thu survey
results be broken down into ten points. Thune points could be utilized to
stimulate discussion to get the merchants and property owners involved to plan
for the promotion of the area. The main incentive which is available to the
interested parties is increased retail trade. More trade will result in more
improvements and a butter image, Dun added . Jeanne pointed out that the City
has a reputation in terms of the downtown of not following through. The
Committee and City should be sure not to start a project then drop it prior to
completion.
The 1985-86 Action plan will be developed following the Committee
discussion with the Council. Copies of the action plan have been
distributed, The Committee will attempt to formulate an achievable plan.
Jeanne discussed the potential for creating a Committee/Chamber slide
presentation. She will contact the state department of Economic Development
for assistance.
The meeting of the Committee with the City Council will be held on
Monday, September 16' 1085. The City Council will be invited to attend the
downtown discussion on the 24th.
Discussion returned to the September 24th meeting. Amo suggested that
thu Committee put achievable items into the plan of action with the downtown
project as a start. A series of follow-up meetings could occur if interest
exiutu. Jeanne suggested that the Business Affairs Committee should be
involved as the Chamber may be able to provide some services under its
existing programu. Chamber resources may be available should the need exist.
The Committee discussed a bus trip which Bill proposed to view economic
development sites in thu City . A tuntativu date of August 20 was set. Bill
will make the appropriate arrangements.
Tony 0rlandini volunteered to act as the Committee' s liaison to the
Tualatin Valley Economic Development Corporation.
Bill was asked how many home occupations presently exist in Tigard. A
number is not available, as many operate without valid permits. Those who
operate a home occupation must file for and receive both at home occupation
permit and a business tax.
BiIl reported to the Committee that Duane Roberto of the Community
Development Department was preparing a brochure for the September
Japanese—American Conference of Mayors. The Committee felt that the project
was worthwhile.
The meeting ended at 9:00 A.M. The next Committee meeting will be held
on Tuesday, September 17, 1085. The Committee will meet with the City Council
on September 16 at Fowler Jr. High at 7:30 P.M.
(WAM:br/1798P)
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD' OREGON
TO: Members of the Economic Development Committee September 3' 1085
FROM: William A. Monahan, Director,
Community Development
SUBJECT: Tigard Brochure - Japan-American Conference of Mayors
The attached brochure was prepared by Duane Roberts, Administrative Planner
with my office, and several volunteers for the upcoming Japan American
Conference. The brochure describes Tigard and the opportunities whiuh the
City offers to businesses seeking land and workers. We are quite pleased with
the product and hope that you are also.
An English translation, a list of the individuals who helped us, and a
description of the costs and savings are attached. Additional copies are
available.
(WAM:br/1707P)
V
FjVArf I-5n113''— t � fiihQ � — F7 ✓ F'H*'k 4 3"N 11kb
Lai�o i (D � ,
4"o �> nt �`a 't �Z���o xcL,Z, 10 dt7' L:t1�7b� +� o�Za � rcb�, teb���j�a�Zb�
TJl�L't�o� { iA�7ta�, t �" F'r�7xr �o -1� c �a�,. j1824T11�, -;�k, 2LDK d�c :g CDIA4It
o-)T 0-)9UR7VA ,JW,6800F9T6,5o zIT*D*1 1041txknfwnI B*RII M
7;i-5- i,tf R D Ft i/
✓�-�•; F 5 (R I-5) -t �'- Fr1o� t x � � � f '- F"r 7z GAG AT, 115 CDJh;a,
7)1 L,t: Z��� a�Z ago z i '— FrJ��t , �1� �a�9#k, �`a v " • ✓�,—fij < -:)7a,6,5o
-f — FMT U, M x> x �l a�, AoJA* `cOtP-C, RzT RZ�*.t,:u---7Y • 7°7
—T U, 7y 11 t' C; f ✓o-)
Z NA, ISM, T*A, V�kWSLo-)
500TFIL ' t&A,'VrR • yATS- 7)ljj�6
G Ci, 1+h'F 13E11 4�t'o k�p�J TIS tGiV�H�}�q� lJti7t � t�o
4o— O-)Mjbo-)A� �(D*hT6�), H*LOD�Z4L
NA, : �►MAO)Z jfl1± ®t.pM *I MM-Offfio, 1000FILSW WMIEjf .tai— 1*7'-'-zt ;5LL;�-w-L,Zoz F3 I yV �y47 ✓ ' l\ -JAIR 7V, --9
-f �° - F 101p—IL) -f ;'— F, tL/:y $1.32 0)T615o -t )'— vmffiG-tZ105�Vvg0)L � �����,
V-f h • t A x�r 40 �.�� —.�—, '7 :r ✓ F ✓ 3.24
4,9-bi J, o
r-h- > V 179 x, v F 3.58 1-5 b,G*ice 15kmPI IBJ�z 7 -�)o)A4R*M
5' T5-5:. 324 SIL fit '' I/ `/ 3.81 M7V66 ), %f,- F5YVMA�k*Lt, V:y �ktZ, t- FVERRR t
391 �° rfi t , V ✓ 4.48 -k�R-L- ✓�-Z U, f�-f 5-P03} -W�t*
t rz7 40 -��- F �, ✓ 5.52 o lift
6.43 14000x0—),f, r • � : � .-rr -
• 't t.,> :?d,U, If:7 n y tf-1,
{ ✓max • i fi-� IL 1985/1/7 RMILo n -x7v6�), �Lruuff � t
t
V T� ✓ ;/&r-F "C aa- o)"j C fid., SVancower
I-5 0-) �aM)tl(D -�Ltis -C06.
_i... Portland 205
international
99e nairport
PORTLAND
7)
X26 405
�26
f 7 5 f ✓7i1 �1 f Jt 7 F 711` 4
Beaverton ze--
99e
7h�-717
—, T`J '� / F ' -7 ( /, •l F, t 2� 99wi5
✓ F 114Vlos
• 7 '� F7'1'1AMMUnMbl�)Mt 110km0D L ng
rd Oswego 99e
LS O) ( A' V::/ Uvff�z HOW)L /Tualatin
205
5
99e
F c NA, MX-L- —, RIM, M
Department of Planning and Development
City of Tigard
)~p1, 4 )T— F M—C-1 Y:, H kifi 4P Burnham&Ash Ave.
P.O. Box 23397
Tigard,OR 97223
i. h.oCI�Id ► b� ��� (503)639-4171
�Lz F-0 LM Tigard Chamber of Commerce
12955 SW Pacific Highway
Tigard,OR 97223
(503)639-1656
The City and Chamber are members of the:
1-5 CORRIDOR
ASSOCIAnON
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF T'IGARD, OREGON
TO: Bill Monahan, Dir. of Comm. Dev . August 28, 1985
FROM: Duane Roberts, Administrative Planner
Herewith is the English—language version of the economic development pamphlet
prepared by staff in conjunction with -the Japan—American Conference of Mayors
and Chamber of Conference Presidents. The pamphlet will be included in the
packet of materials given out to conference delegates. According to
conference organizers, Tigard is the only area city, besides Portland, the
host city, to prepare informational material in either Japanese or English for
the conference.
The Japanese version was prepared by two volunteer translators. One has done
translation for the Portland Development Commission, Nike, and other area
organizations . Before coming to Portland, she worked for the American Embassy
in Tokyo as a trade show consultant. The other translator teaches Japanese at
West Linn High School . Both have master' s degrees from American
Universities. Knowledgable people, namely the two persons identified below,
advise that the Japanese translation is "much better written" than the English
original .
Two highly qualified Japanese businessmen living and working in Portland
metropolis served as advisors to the project. One, Mr. Kumashiro, is Vice
President of Ataka lumber and, inter alia, also serves as board chairman of
the Japanese School of Portland. The other, Mr. Kawakami, is General Manger
of NEC American. Particularly significant is that he played a key role in
selecting Hillsboro as the site for the NEC electronics plant presently under
construction there. The advisors reviewed the English and Japanese first
drafts of the pamphlet and offered many helpful comments and suggestions.
Most of these were incorporated into the final draft. Jeannie Caswell of the
Tigard Chamber reviewed and commented on the English first draft.
Excluding staff time, the cost of the pamphlet and the mayor' s business card
were: $50 for word processing (in Japanese), and $250 for (two—color)
printing (500 copies) . Based on prevailing rates for quality work ($400 and
$500 per page, respectively, for Japanese Translation Service and Phillip
Kano) the value of the translators' "in kind" contribution was approximately
$800 to $1,000.
Initial distribution of the pamphlet is as follows:
Mayor' s Conference 120 copies
OEDC Tokyo Office 1.00
Tigard Chamber of Commerce 20
Grubb & Ellis 30
TVEDC 20
Undistributed 210
As requested, listed below are the names and addresses of the volunteers who
participated in the project;
i
Tadakazu Kumashiro
Executive Vice President
Ataka Lumber
I
101 SW Main
i
Suite 1450
�I
Portland 97204
Kuninori Kawakami
NEC America
Vice President and General Manager
14250 NW Science Park Dr.
Portland 97229
Noriko Huruse Roberts
2758 SE 28th Pl.
Portland 97202
Hitomi Tamura
Foreign Language Dept.
West Linn High School, West "A"
West Linn, OR 97068
(DR:pm/1781P)
MAYOR'S CONFERENCE PAMPHLET
Tigard and the I-5 Economic Development Association welcome you to Oregon and
to the Japan—US Mayor' s Conference.
Located on the southwestern edge of Portland, Oregon, a city made prominent in
Japan by the popular TV series "From Oregon with Love", the municipality of
Tigard is a prosperous and growing community . It is one of six communities
that make up the Interstate-5 economic development Association. In addition
to highly attractive living conditions, the I-5 area has seven major
industrial parks and a significant amount of vacant land available for
commercial and industrial development. Local government officials, business
representatives, and the community at large have made a solid commitment to
provide services that are needed for development and to seek ways to enhance
business opportunities. Tigard' s current budget for street, sewer, and
drainage improvements to the amount of $5 million is illustrative.
VACANT INDUSTRIAL LAND
Tigard 101 Hectares
Lake Oswego 40
Sherwood 179 i
Tualatin 324 i
Wilsonville 391
Aurora 40
Labor Force
i
i
Tigard' s labor force is young and well—educated. More than 40 percent have
attended a college or university . A work force of well over 100,000 people is
within a 2.0 minutes driving radius of Tigard and the I-5 corridor.
Taxes
Tigard' s tax rate is among the lowest in the metropolitan area. The low rate
is attributable to sound fiscal management and a strong economic base.
Industrial and commercial properties represent a large portion of the tax
base. State taxes compare favorably with those of other west coast states .
Significantly, Oregon' s "unitary" system of taxation was repealed last year,
with a view toward promoting overseas investment in the state.
PROPERTY TAX RATE
Per $1,000 of Assessed Value
Tigard, Oregon $1 .32
Vancouver, Washington 3 . 24
Camas, Washington 3 .58
Hillsboro, Oregon 3 . 81
Gresham, Oregon 4.48
Beaverton, Oregon 5.52
Portland, Oregon 6.43
SOURCE: The Business Journal, January 7, 1985.
Housing
Housing in Tigard and the I-5 area is plentiful and affordable. A majority of
housing is less than seven years old. A single family house averages around
1,824,000 yen. Average rent for a two bedroom apartment is 76,800 yen. All
residential areas are served by convenient neighborhood commercial centers
that are within a few minutes walk or drive.
Schools
With its nine elementary, two middle, and one high school., Tigard is committed
to high standards of excellence in its school system. Computer education
programs are offered in every school, and beginning this year, courses in the
Japanese language will be offered in the high school. The addition of
Japanese to the curriculum reflects a community desire to foster cultural
understanding and awareness .
Higher education is available from seven institutions located within a 1.5 km
radius of the I-5 area. Two of these, Portland State University and the
Oregon Graduate Center, offer programs of study for people employed in the
high technology fields . Portland Community College, with an enrollment of
1.4,000, is a nearby community college that features excellent training
programs in business, computer education, and machine shop technology . The
school works closely with business to provide special services and training.
Tigard and the other communities in the I-5 area are just 15 kilometers from
the Japanese School. of Portland, which offers Saturday classes for children of
Japanese families who are located in the metropolitan area. The curriculum is
set by the Japanese Ministry of Education, and the textbooks are the same as
those used in public schools in Japan.
Shopping and Services
Tigard is served by several major shopping centers . Largest of these is
Washington Square, a regional shopping center which includes 115 large and
small. stores. The newest is Loehmann' s Plaza which I•ias been honored for
design excellence by the American Institute of Architects.
Two major hospitals, St. Vincent and Meridian Park, are located within ten
minutes driving time of central Tigard. Each hospital is equipped with the
most modern facilities and offers a full. range of health care services,
Tigard is also favorably located with respect to air service. The Portland
International Airport is only 25 minutes by freeway from Tigard . A direct
Flight to Narita departs every Tuesday .
Recreation and Culture
One of the strong attractions of the I-5 area is the easy access to
recreational and cultural amenities . The Tualatin and Willamette Rivers flow
through the area and offer a full range of water activities, including
swimming, fishing, boating and windsurfing.
Other major- recreational. attractions are golf, tennis, and horseback riding .
The Mt. Hood recreation area, featuring year-round snow skiing, is 110 km, to
the east, and the scenic Oregon coast, with its white sand beaches, is 130 kin.
to the west.
Tigard is especially known for its modern Performing Arts Center located near
I-5. Construction is presently underway on a combined civic center, library,
and community park development project with a completion date of early 1986.
Tigard and the six other cities composing the I--5 Economic Development
Association cordially invite you to consider the investment opportunities that
they have to offer to Japanese business and industry . When you return home,
we would be grateful for your assistance in informing businesses that may be
considering locating in the U.S. of Tigard and the I-5 Association' s active
program to bring Japanese and other companies to our area.
(DR:pm/1718P)
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TDGARD' OREGON
TO: Members of the Economic Development Committee August 28, 1985
.4�'
FROM: William A. Monahan, Director, »w^'
Community Development
SUBJECT: Business Trip to View Development Sites
The Committee agreed last week to organize a bus trip to view development
sites in the City. We tentatively set Thursday morning, August 29 as the date
for the trip' however, my office was unable to secure a suitable bus to
transport us. We need to choose an alternate date.
In order that we may determine which date is best for the most Committee
members, please indicate which of the dates listed below is best for you and
return this form to me. Please also note which date or dates you would not be
able to take the tour. The dates chosen would allow us enough advance time to
schedule the bus.
Name: Dates Preferred: Sept. 12
Sept. 19
Thanks for your help. If you prefer to call in your response, please ask for
Billie Rawlings at extension 26.
(WAM:br/1775P)
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TO: Member of the Tigard City Council August 28, 1985
FROM: Tigard Economic Development Committee
SUBJECT: Central Business District Survey — Interest Meeting
The Tigard Economic Development Committee has conducted a survey of property
owners and businesses in the downtown area. The area was identified as one of
four target areas by the City Council when it first formed the Committee. We
hope that the survey and a follow up meeting which we will hold on
September 24 will provide us with the informational base needed to form a
strategy to plan improvements for the area.
A copy of the survey results is attached for your information. The survey
will be the starting point for our discussion at an Interest Meeting on
September 24 at 6:00 P.M. at the Tigard Community Center on Commercial
Street. All downtown property owners and business operators will be invited
to give their input. Your participation would also be greatly appreciated.
Our intent is to determine if enough interest exists to create a
business—backed program for improvement. City participation would be limited
to avoid beginning a program which is not supported by the benefitting
parties. Please attend if you can.
(WAM:br/1775P)
CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
SURVEY ANALYSIS
1. What do you feel are the existing problems which prevent the central
business district, from developing into a stronger center?
12 Traffic
12 Parking
3 Zoning
5 Existing business mix
15 Appearance of the area
3 Public Facilities
1 Other
Appearance of the area was cited as the major problem. One respondent
stated that public property was the problem. Traffic and parking were
also cited as mayor problems.
Among the comments provided by the respondents, several related to zoning
and business mix. There was no clear coricensus, however, as some felt
that industry should be phased_ out, consistent with the comprehensive
plan, while others favored allowing new industrial uses. Appearance of
the area was rated as needing improvement.
Traffic and parking were rated as inadequate for the needs of the area.
Improvements were suggested.
2. Do you think the following would be positive steps toward improving the
area?
The appearance of downtown buildings was cited as the major problem. 78%
felt that property owners should be encouraged or required to better
maintain the appearances of their property. Other positive steps
identified were creation of a shopping center at the south end of Main
Street, creation of off—street parking lots, and creation of a downtown
merchant's and property owners promotional organization. Their comments
imply a desire on the part of the property owners and businesses to take
positive steps to stimulate the level of business activity in the area.
3. What direction should the Committee pursue to help the area change for the
better?
Mixed input was given concerning whether the Committee should be involved
or if the area should be allowed to develop on its own. The majority of
respondents did, however, suggest that the Committee, Chamber, or City
should work to improve the area and establish a plan. Comments about
appearance were again voiced.
4. What can the private sector, the existing property owners, and business in
the area, do to improve the downtown?
Appearance of the area dominated these responses also. Improvement of
existing buildings and efforts to make a cleaner, neater appearance were
cited. Present property owners were encouraged to get together and plan
for a better downtown, spend money for improvements,- or sell to someone
who will upgrade the property.
5. What are the greatest positive factors which would attract new business to
the area?
Improved appearances, parking, bringing responsible development to the
area, and improved government involvement were suggested. Improvements
suggested throughout the survey were reiterated. Better governmental
input was mentioned in terms of a need for leadership, specifically in
dealing with potential developers.
8. Any other comments?
Some positive comments were expressed, again about appearance and
attitude. Suggestions for creation of an architectural review committee,
improvement to a portal drop condition, and park improvements which would
stimulate pedestrian traffic. were mentioned.
(WAM:bs/1733P)
1 . Please elaborate on your concerns for the existing problems which prevent
the central business district from developing into a stronger commercial
center, and other problems which you feel exist:
* Main Street traffic and parking are not very good.
* With regard to Main Street - the portion south of the
railroad tracks could benefit from a shopping center at the
south end as previously .planned. This section has the
poorest appearing buildings. Building owners need an
attraction to merit improving existing buildings. This
would improve the whole street. Parking is about adequate,
though angle parking makes for -difficulty in backing into
traffic.
Zoning on Burnham should be changed back to Light
Industrial instead of C-P.
Move business district to Pacific Hwy.
* Traffic is Circa 1985 .controlled as if it were Circa 1885.
I feel there are no problems that the downtown area is
viable, etc. We are in an economic slump when Oregon and
Portland comes out of slump, downtown Tigard will be
jumping. Have you noticed some shopping malls that have a
lot of amenities also have lots of space for rent - it's
economic times.
Post Office dropbox traffic is a mess. Create additional
drop areas such as in turn-around area at south end of
Main. (In front of liquor store if you want?).
* The industrial area needs to be phased out - not in in the
area. The value of the property will go up not down if
strong leadership will set the goal and not waiver.
Restricting the flow from side streets onto Main. Main
Street becomes a bottleneck.
* The main problem spot in Tigard is on Main Street. It is
out-dated. There are so many new business centers in the
Tigard area, that the little shops could gp too. We really
need to have specialty shops - like a big parts house
leaning more towards helping industry out. Machine Shop.
Widen Main Street all along from one and to the other.
Discount Food Store should be zoned for the above.
* I think that without exception of maybe a few buildings
that the appearance of the downtown is pathetic. Maybe if.
we organized effort towards this, it would help.
Particularly most of the buildings on the west and have had
little or nothing done to them in years. Another important
thing .is to fill the empty buildings with viable businesses.
* Tigard needs a Long Range Plan for enhancement and
development of the core area. The establishment of the
Greenway Pak and the positioning of the Civic Center were a
good start. Now there is a need to establish a time frame
on getting the industrial uses out of the core area.
* If relocating the railroad is not an option then the next
best thing would be to beam it or use landscape materials
for site and sound screening.
I feel that the City of Tigard should have better control
of the building that is now occurring in the City,
residential as well as commercial. As a local testing the
inspection agency, we are frequently called upon to inspect
sites in the City, but the City Building Department has not
listed on the building permits what inspection and/or
testing they require. When we have called asking for
clarifications, we get the impression that they have no set
guidelines for building practices. We suggest that tighter
controls and set guidelines be established as per the
Uniform Building Code.
* The west end of town looks terrible.
* Main Street in Tigard is often at capacity restricting the
flow from side streets onto Main. Main Street becomes a
bottleneck.
* Most cities are doing away with center dividers, and having
left turn lanes. We feel the dividers tend to push the
traffic on through. If it isn't easy and convenient to get
into a place of business, most people will look for a place
more convenient.
* (0) We need an easier access. to Main Street at the north
entrance - like a right turn at Greenburg Rd. to Center
Street and then down to Commercial and under the overpass.
(0) Business overns and property owners need to improve
their existing premises modernize .and landscape. (0)
Parking could be placed on the railroad right-of-way
between Nall Blvd, and Tideman with cooperation of SP 6
BN. (0) Storm drainage and street improvements in the
downtown area would keep as was planned under urban renewal
- The tin building along fanno Creek should be removed and
Tri-Met Transfer station put there.
* Living in Seattle and not getting to Tigard often, it is
hard to make decisions.
* The City owned property is unkept, and ugly. No or low
maintenance such as around creek and bridge, bridge needs
paint and cleaning. Area around railroad tracks is
overgrown and needs grass or planting or something that
appeals to the eye. Most private property is well kept.
Those properties that are abondoned should be weeded or
maintained at owners expense, even if that includes City.
* Too hard to drive to and park in downtown Tigard. Need
larger areas for general-commercial zoning.
Anything - almost - done to the south end of Tigard would
be an improvement. Clean up around Girods Bldg. would help
too - seems the bus stop there is always a mess.
e Do not feel Tri Met is worth its' expense, and feel service
should be limited - not expanded.
The continuity of charm, character and architecture are
terrible not just poor. Signs are not uniform - yards are
not . maintained. The Payless shopping center and the City
entrance are not well kept _ weeds and uncut grass are
almost year round. Poor leadership and very low-standard
thinking dominate the community leadership. No identity to
downtown. People ask where is downtown Tigard?
2. Do you think the following would be positive steps toward improving the
area?
YES NO NC
7 16 Development of a Tri Met transfer station at the site of
the Tigard Auto Body.
15 8 A shopping center at the south end of Main Street.
8 13 2 Rezoning of land along the railroad tracks on Burnham
Ave. to allow industrial uses.
13 81 2 Creation of off-street parking lots.
18 4� 1 Encourage or require property owners to maintain the
appearance of their buildings.
13 8 2 Creation of a downtown merchant's and property owners
association to promote the downtown.
3. What direction should the committee pursue to help the area change for the
better? (Let the area develop on its own, represent the business
community before the City Council, etc. ) .
* The committee should speak for the community in a for,
organized way.
* Let the area develop on its own. There are already too
many groups and committees in Tigard.
* Continued Chamber contact with Council.
* Let the area develop on its; own.
* The area needs a shot in the arm - sidewalks, streets.
sewer and storm drains to get the area cleaned up -
something like urban renewal.
I definitely feel that every city needs careful planning to
attract shoppers. (Represent .the business community) .
* Call in groups of downtown property owners to discuss the
future with the Economic Development Committee and then set
some goals and projects.
Sponsor a competition among City planners to desgin the
ideal city plan for Tigard. Get the best kinds available
to do some long .range possibility thinking.
* I believe the charm of Tigard is one of old town and small
and that to promote that theme of small town in the complex
world is refreshing.
e Industrial Business. Keep rent within reason. Have a
speed zone that is mandatory for the trains going through.
Sometimes it looks like they pass here at 60 mph.
Improve the overall quality of the area. For instance the
park on the east end is a mess most of the time.
* There used to be such a committee and that seemed to be
helpful:
* Get a' better anchor store than 'Costco for downtown shopping
center idea. G.I. Joe's was perfect! Too bad about that
one. Even though it would have hurt my business mightily! !
* Set up a master plan - Set high goals. I really question
the judgement in allowing a body building business in a
downtown retail location. U.S. Bank was allowed to build
an ill-design ed . parking lot and color their building with
unattractive colors. No common sense sometimes.
4. What can and. should the private sector, the existing property owners, and
business in the area, do to improve the downtown?
a Push for off-street parking lots, get together on pushing
for promotion.
* Start over and remove old- existing buildings and create a
new imag for downtown.
Spend some money improving total properties.
* Nothing.
* If a group generates the leadership and communicates to the
public, the viability of downtown.
+� Some of the current property owners should meet with each
other - those who have vacant land or marginal buildings -
and discuss. the possibility of jointly putting their
property together to -encourage a large developer to. come in
to the downtown area.
* Keep it clean.
Spend some money or sell out to someone who will have
quality business, paint, remodeling, landscaping, improve
traffic flow or patterns, etc.
* More and responsible development.
e Make a real effort to make their properties as attractive
as possible. And- take an active part in the, decisions that
need to be make in working toward the goal of the ideal
community.
e Keep the front of their business neat. City Hall- building
is one of the worst about doing this. Old Planing Mill
Bldg. and A-Boy West are a disgrace. Perhaps the owners
could be encourage to take some pride in their buildings.
* Maintain their buildings better, provide off-street parking.
Get a plan together and spend $$. It takes $$ but
communites like Lake Grove and Beaverton are the
progressive leaders Just- look and see what they are
doing! !
5. What are the greatest positive factors which would attract new business to
the area?
* Additional off-street parking. Better traffic flow between
side streets and Main Street.
* Parking and neatness.
* Need a traffic building in Girod's - (food warehouse) old
location.
Clean looking attractive community with a progressive
business community. Good leadership - Tigard is famous for
it's do-nothing backwards leadership.
e Parking, nice appearance, zoning.
* Low rents are currently the attraction. Also - many
tenants prefer downtown to the Hwy. 99 locations with the
extremely heavy traffic and difficulty and danger in
getting into the parking areas.
* New City government.
a Development of south and of Main Street as an anchor ,plus
Main Street bridge reconstruction, plus overall improvement
of properties in area.
* Location and identity. Main Street is especially easy to
direct people to.
* Streets, sidewalks, signals where needed, sewer and storm
drains - solid leadership and support for development.
* I definitely feel the traffic dividers are the biggest
problem.
Putting together a large tract of the downtown area for
development of a large and responsible developer.
* An old town theme..
* City maintaining things better and existing building owners
doing their share.
A demonstrated sense of fair play and cooperation with
developers by the City staff, Planning Commission, and
Council in fostering new projects of mutual interest and
benifit.
7. Please check the item which best describes you:
6 Owner of property in the downtown, and
business operator in downtown.
12 Owner of property in the downtown.
5 Business operator in the downtown.
B. ANY OTHER COMMENTS?
* Downtown merchants and property owners do not seem to be
nearly so concerned as area residents and City staff -
aifter 15 years of looking at little change I'm wondering if
industrial development might be more appropriate.
In business myself since 1972 in Portland and Tigard.
* Tigard needs an architectural committee with some higher
standards. Bob Randall's building on Scoffins is ugly
looking - no trim paint used and they painted the cedar
shakes! I must say McDonald's has set a high standard for
looks which i's a national policy - Beautiful yard, etc. !
Stationery store is real sharp too!
a There is no pedestrian traffic in the area. An attraction
for people to walk thru the business district would
definitely be helpful. Many businesses will not locate
here because of this lack.
* We are renters who manufacture products for the lumber and
paper industry so are not too concerned about the downtown
area as a retail business would be.
* A positive attitude would help! That swans the City's as
well as property owners and businessmen.
Start with one project at a time - finish it - evaluate it
- proceed to next project. I sincerely believe postal drop
is the most important 1st priority.
* The Civic Center - Hiking and Fanno Creek developments
should be used to trigger the development of Downtown
Tigard Main Street as a commercial business center. It
should not be downzoned or put back to industrial or
strictly Business-Professional. It should become retail.
A viable economic center.
* I am the past elected committee person for my precinct
X133. I am involved as much as time and money will allow.
I am very concerned about our town and the quality of life
we all have to live in. I am very conservative by nature
and make do with what I have, and I believe Tigard can do
the same.
I have thought something like this is way overdue. What is
happening on Pacific Highway only shows that we are in the
dark ages. Hillsboro tried something similar, spent a lot
of money on a study and an individual, with basically
nothing coming out of it.
(1697P)
^
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD' OREGON
TO: Economic Development Resource Leads August 26, 1085
FROM: William A. Monahan '^
Direotor of Community Development
SUBJECT: Downtown Property Survey
The Economic Development Committee has conducted a survey of downtown property
owners and businesses. As a resource person to the Committee' s downtown
representative, Tony 0rlandini, we would appreciate your input to the
results . In addition, we will be holding a special meeting in the downtown on
September 24' 6:00 P.M. at the Tigard Community Center on Commercial Street.
Prior to thu meeting we will send a copy of the survey analysis with a cover
letter to all property owners to invite them to participate in the meeting.
Please attend the September 24 meeting if you schedule permits .
(WAM:pm/1770P)
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TO: Members of the Economic Development Committee August 14, 1985
FROM: William A. Monahan, Director of Community Developmentl e
SUBJECT: Survey Results
Enclosed please find a copy of the survey results which I have prepared for
the downtown questionaire. I attempted to draw some generalizations from the
responses. We will discuss these results at our next meeting.
Please bring these materials as well as the others sent to you with the agenda
to the meeting on Tuesday, August 20, 1985 at 7:30 AM. Please be reminded
again that the discussion with the Council originally scheduled for August 19
has been postponed to September 16, 1985.
(WAM:bs/1733P)
CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
SURVEY ANALYSIS
1. What do you feel are the existing problems which prevent the central
business district from developing into a stronger center?
12 Traffic
12 Parking
3 Zoning
5 Existing business mix
15 Appearance of the area
3 Public Facilities
1 Other
Appearance of the area was cited as the major problem. One respondent
stated that public property was the problem. Traffic and parking were
also cited as mayor problems.
Among the comments provided by the respondents, several related to zoning
and business mix. There was no clear concensus, however, as some felt
that industry should be phased. out, consistent with the comprehensive
plan, while others favored allowing new industrial uses. Appearance of
the area was rated as needing improvement.
Traffic and parking were rated as inadequate for the needs of the area.
Improvements were suggested.
2. Do you think the following would be positive steps toward improving the
area?
The appearance of downtown buildings was cited as the major problem. 78%
felt that property owners should be encouraged or required to better
maintain the appearances of their property. Other positive steps
identified were creation of a shopping center at the south end of Main
Street, creation of off—street parking lots, and creation of a downtown
merchant' s and property owners promotional organization. Their comments
imply a desire on the part of the property owners and businesses to take
positive steps to stimulate the level of business activity in the area.
3. What direction should the Committee pursue to help the area change for the
better?
Mixed input was given concerning whether the Committee should be involved
or if the area should be allowed to develop on its own. The majority of
respondents did, however, suggest that the Committee, Chamber, or City
should work to improve the area and establish a plan. Comments about
appearance were again voiced.
4. What can the private sector, the existing property owners, and business in
the area, do to improve the downtown?
Appearance of the area dominated these responses also. Improvement of
existing buildings and efforts to make a cleaner, neater appearance were
cited. Present property owners were encouraged to get together and plan
for a better downtown, spend money for improvements, or sell to someone
who will upgrade the property.
5. What are the greatest positive factors which would attract new business to
the area?
Improved appearances, parking, bringing responsible development to the
area, and improved government involvement were suggested. Improvements
suggested throughout the survey were reiterated. Better governmental
input was mentioned in terms of a need for leadership, specifically in
dealing with potential developers.
8. Any other comments?
Some positive comments were expressed, again about appearance and
attitude. Suggestions for creation of an architectural review committee,
improvement to a portal drop condition, and park improvements which would
stimulate pedestrian traffic were mentioned.
(WAM:bs/1733P)
1 . Please elaborate on your concerns for the existing problems which prevent
the central business district from developing into a stronger commercial
center, and other problems which you feel exist:
X Main Street traffic and parking are not very good.
With regard to Main Street - the portion south of the
railroad tracks could benefit from a shopping center at the
south end as previously planned. This section has the
poorest appearing buildings. Building owners need an
attraction to merit improving existing buildings. This
would improve the whole street. Parking is about adequate,
though angle parking makes for difficulty in backing into
traffic.
* Zoning on Burnham should be changed back to Light
Industrial instead of C-P.
* Move business district to Pacific Hwy.
Traffic is Circa 1985 controlled as if it were Circa 1885.
* I feel there are no problems that the downtown area is
viable, etc. We are in an economic slump when Oregon and
Portland comes out of slump, downtown Tigard will be
jumping. Have you noticed some shopping malls that have a
lot of amenities also have lots of space for rent - it's
economic times.
* Post Office dropbox traffic is a mess. Create additional
drop areas such as in turn-around area at south end of
Main. (In front of liquor store if you want?) .
The industrial area needs to be phased out - not in in the
area. The value of the property will go up not down if
strong leadership will set the goal and not waiver.
* Restricting the flow from side streets onto Main. Main
Street becomes a bottleneck.
The main problem spot in Tigard is on Main Street. It is
out-dated. There are so many new business centers in the
Tigard area, that the little shops could go too. We really
need to have specialty shops - like a big parts house
leaning more towards helping industry out. Machine Shop.
Widen Main Street all along from one end to the other.
Discount Food Store should be zoned for the above,
* I think that without exception of maybe a few buildings
that the appearance of the downtown is pathetic. Maybe if
we organized effort towards this, it would help.
Particularly most of the buildings on the west end have had
little or nothing done to them in years. Another important
thing is to fill the empty buildings with viable businesses.
* Tigard needs a Long Range Plan for enhancement and
development of the core area. The establishment of the
Greenway Pak and the positioning of the Civic Center were a
good start. Now there is a need to establish a time frame
on getting the industrial uses out of the core area.
If relocating the railroad is not an option then the next
best thing would be to beam it or use landscape materials
for site and sound screening.
* I feel that the City of Tigard should have better control
of the building that is now occurring in the City,
residential as well as commercial. As a local testing the
inspection agency, we are frequently called upon to inspect
sites in the City, but the City Building Department has not
listed on the building permits what inspection and/or
testing they require. When we have called asking for
clarifications, we get the impression that they have no set
guidelines for building practices. We suggest that tighter
controls and set guidelines be established as per the
Uniform Building Code.
The west end of town looks terrible.
* Main Street in Tigard is often at capacity restricting the
flow from side streets onto Main. Main Street becomes a
bottleneck.
* Most cities are doing away with center dividers, and having
left turn lanes. We feel the dividers tend to push the
traffic on through. If it isn't easy and convenient to get
into a place of business, most people will look for a place
more convenient.
(0) We need an easier access to Main Street at the north
entrance - like a right turn at Greenburg Rd. to Center
Street and then down to Commercial and under the overpass.
(0) Business overns and property owners need to improve
their existing premises modernize and landscape. (0)
Parking could be placed on the railroad right-of--way
between Hall Blvd. and Tideman with cooperation of SP &
BN. (0) Storm drainage and street improvements in the
downtown area would keep as was planned under urban renewal
- The tin building along Fanno Creek should be removed and
Tri-Met Transfer station put there.
Living in Seattle and not getting to Tigard often, it is
hard to make decisions.
* The City owned property is unkept and ugly. No or low
maintenance such as around creek and bridge, bridge needs
paint and cleaning. Area around railroad tracks is
overgrown and needs grass or planting or something that
appeals to the eye. Most private property is well kept.
Those properties that are abondoned should be weeded or
maintained at owners expense, even if that includes City.
* Too hard to drive to and park in downtown Tigard. Need
larger areas for general-commercial zoning.
* Anything - almost - done to the south end of Tigard would
be an improvement. Clean up around Girods Bldg. would help
too - seems the bus stop there is always a mess.
Do not feel Tri Met is worth its' expense, and feel service
should be limited - not expanded.
* The continuity of charm, character and architecture are
terrible not just poor. Signs are not uniform - yards are
not maintained. The Payless shopping center and the City
entrance are not well kept - weeds and uncut grass are
almost year round. Poor leadership and very low-standard
thinking dominate the community leadership. No identity to
downtown. People ask where is downtown Tigard?
2. Do you think the following would be positive steps toward improving the
area?
YES NO NC
7 16 Development of a Tri Met transfer station at the site of
the Tigard Auto Body.
15 8 A shopping center at the south end of Main Street.
8 13 2 Rezoning of land along the railroad tracks on Burnham
Ave. to allow industrial uses.
13 81 2 Creation of off-street parking lots.
18 48 1 Encourage or require property owners to maintain the
appearance of their buildings.
13 8 2 Creation of a downtown merchant' s and property owners
association to promote the downtown.
3. What direction should the committee pursue to help the area change for the
better? (Let the area develop on its own, represent the business
community before the City Council, etc. ) .
* The committee should speak for the community in a for,
organized way.
* Let the area develop on its own. There are already too
many groups and committees in Tigard.
* Continued Chamber contact with Council.
* Let the area develop on its. own.
* The area needs a shot in the arm - sidewalks, streets,
sewer and storm drains to get the area cleaned up -
something like urban renewal.
* I definitely feel that every city needs careful planning to
attract shoppers . (Represent the business community) .
* Call in groups of downtown property owners to discuss the
future with the Economic Development Committee and then set
some goals and projects.
* Sponsor a competition among City planners to desgin the
ideal city plan for Tigard. Get the best kinds available
to do some long range possibility thinking.
* I believe the charm of Tigard is one of old town and small
and that to promote that theme of small town in the complex
world is refreshing.
Industrial Business. Keep rent within reason. Have a
speed zone that is mandatory for the trains going through.
Sometimes it looks like they pass here at 60 mph.
Improve the overall quality of the area. For instance the
park on the east end is a mess most of the time.
* There used to be such a committee and that seemed to be
helpful.
Get a better anchor store than Costco for downtown shopping
center idea. G.I. Joe' s was perfect! Too bad about that
one. Even though it would have hurt my business mightily! !
Set up a master plan - Set high goals. I really question
the judgement in allowing a body building business in a
downtown retail location. U.S. Bank was allowed to build
an ill-designed parking lot and color their building with
unattractive colors. No common sense sometimes.
4. What can and should the private sector, the existing property owners, and
business in the area, do to improve the downtown?
* Push for off-street parking lots, get together on pushing
for promotion.
* Start over and remove old existing buildings and create a
new imag for downtown.
* Spend some money improving total properties.
Nothing.
* If a group generates the leadership and communicates to the
public, the viability of downtown.
Some of the current property owners should meet with each
other - those who have vacant land or marginal buildings -
and discuss the possibility of jointly putting their
property together to encourage a large developer to come in
to the downtown area.
* Keep it clean.
Spend some money or sell out to someone who will. have
quality business, paint, remodeling, landscaping, improve
traffic flow or patterns, etc.
More and responsible development.
* Make a real effort to make their properties as attractive
as possible. And take an active part in the decisions that
need to be make in working toward the goal of the ideal
community.
* Keep the front of their business neat. City Hall building
is one of the worst about doing this. Old Planing Mill
Bldg. and A-Boy West are a disgrace. Perhaps the owners
could be encourage to take some pride in their buildings.
* Maintain their buildings better, provide off-street parking.
* Get a plan together and spend $$. It takes $$ but
communites like Lake Grove and Beaverton are the
progressive leaders - Just- look and see what they are
doing! !
5. What are the greatest positive factors which would attract new business to
the area?
Additional off-street parking. Better traffic flow between
side streets and Main Street.
* Parking and neatness.
Need a traffic building in Girod' s - (food warehouse) old
location.
* Clean looking attractive community with a progressive
business community. Good leadership - Tigard is famous for
it' s do-nothing backwards leadership.
* Parking, nice appearance, zoning.
Low rents are currently the attraction. Also - many
tenants prefer downtown to the Hwy. 99 locations with the
extremely heavy traffic and difficulty and danger in
getting into the parking areas.
* New City government.
* Development of south end of Main Street as an anchor plus
Main Street bridge reconstruction, plus overall improvement
of properties in area.
* Location and identity. Main Street is especially easy to
direct people to.
* Streets, sidewalks, signals where needed, sewer and storm
drains -- solid leadership and support for development.
I definitely feel the traffic dividers are the biggest
problem.
Putting together a large tract of the downtown area for
development of a large and responsible developer.
* An old town theme.
City maintaining things better and existing building owners
doing their share.
A demonstrated sense of fair play and cooperation with
developers by the City staff, Planning Commission, and
Council in fostering new projects of mutual interest and
benifit.
7. Please check the item which best describes you:
6 Owner of property in the downtown, and
business operator in downtown.
12 Owner of property in the downtown.
5 Business operator in the downtown.
8. ANY OTHER COMMENTS?
* Downtown merchants and property owners do not seem to be
nearly so concerned as area residents and City staff —
after 15 years of looking at little change I'm wondering if
industrial development might be more appropriate.
* In business myself since 1972 in Portland and Tigard.
* Tigard needs an architectural committee with some higher
standards. Bob Randall's building on Scoffins is ugly
looking — no trim paint used and they painted the cedar
shakes! I must say McDonald's has set a high standard for
looks which is a national policy — Beautiful yard, etc. !
Stationery store is real sharp too!
* There is no pedestrian traffic in the area. An attraction
for people to walk thru the business district would
definitely be helpful. Many businesses will not locate
here because of this lack.
We are renters who manufacture products for the lumber and
paper industry so are not too concerned about the downtown
area as a retail business would be.
A positive attitude would help! That means the City's as
well as property owners and businessmen.
Start with one project at a time - finish it - evaluate it
- proceed to next project. I sincerely believe postal drop
is the most important lst priority.
The Civic Center - Hiking and Fanno Creek developments
should be used to trigger the development of Downtown
Tigard Main Street as a commercial business center. It
should not be downzoned or put back to industrial or
strictly Business-Professional. It should become retail.
A viable economic center.
* I am the past elected committee person for my precinct
x/33. I am involved as much as time and money will allow.
I am very concerned about our town and the quality of life
we all have to live in. I am very conservative by nature
and make do with what I have, and I believe Tigard can do
the same.
I have thought something like this is way overdue. What is
happening on Pacific Highway only shows that we are in the
dark ages. Hillsboro tried something similar, spent a lot
of money on a study and an individual, with basically
nothing coming out of it.
(1697P)