The URL can be used to link to this page

10/15/1985 - Packet ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE October 15, 1085 7:30 A.M. — Pioneer Pies 1. Minutes of September 17, 1085 2. Downtown Meeting Results September 24' 1085 Meeting Next Meeting — Wednesday, October 23, 1085 Tigard Community Center 3 . Oregon Public Works Infrastructure Program 4. 1085 Governor' s Corporate Excellence Awards — Nominees 5. Presentations by Developers 6. Action Plan — Draft will be prepared for November 7. Other 8uoinuuo 8 . Next Meeting — November 19, 1085 0. Adjourn (WAM:6r/1077P) F VICTOR ATIYEH GOVERNOR 0 F F I C E OF THE GOVERNOR STATE CAPITOL SALEM. OREGON 97310 October 1, 1985 Dear Mayor: Oregon businesses represent the foundation of our state's economy, providing secure jobs and growing payrolls for Oregonians. But I sometimes worry that, as we successfully sell Oregon to the world, these "home team" companies with long-term records of service may feel forgotten. I have not forgotten them. In fact, a major reason for my unprecedented efforts to attract new business to Oregon is to stimulate and diversify our economy to benefit those enterprises already in our state. I want your help in recognizing Oregon businesses. I want you to help me select fifteen businesses to receive the 1985 Governor's Corporate Excellence Awards for contributions in economic development and community service. A nomination form is enclosed which includes an invitation to the awards dinner on December 17. As a leader in your community, you know of a local company whose contributions ought to be singled out for special recognition. To ensure that this company is considered, please complete the nomination form and mail it to my special projects assistant, Barbara Carey, by Friday, November 1st. Oregon businesses are critical to the continuing strength of our economy; you and I know that. I want you to help me remind other Oregonians of this fact. Your assistance in helping to make this recognition a great success is most appreciated. Siere ly, VAictorA iyeh Governor VA:cg Enclosure GOVERNOR'S 1985 CORPORATE EXCELLENCE AWARDS -g9/ OFFICIAL NOMINATION FORM Region: (-see page two for regions) Central 0 Eastern 0 Northwestern Southwestern 0 Portland Metropolitan Z7 company size: 0 (5 or fewer employees) 0 (6-100 employees) Z7 (more than 100 employees) Name of Business owner or Chief Executive Officer Address of Firm City zip Telephone Sponsored by Address City zip Telephone sponsor I s signature Title Date DEAMME: Entry forms must be postmarked no later than Friday, November 1, 1985 and received by the Governor's Office no later than Monday, November 4, 1985. Entries should be sent to Barbara Carey, Governor's Office, Salem, OR 97310. If you have questions, please contact Barbara Carey at 378-3548 in Salem. Describe nominee's acoamplishments in either or both areas below. Please type or print clearly. Be as specific as possible, especially regarding dates of community activities and services. Please use only the front and back pages of this form to complete your narrative. Up to ten pages of additional materials supporting the endorsement of the nominee may also be attached. ECIONCHIC EEVE10PN= (See Selection Criteria on page one) : CCKKNITY SERVICE (See Selection Criteria on page one) : a. GOVERNOR'S Z 1985 CORPORATE EXCELLENCE AWARDS • PURPOSE: To recognize Oregon business enterprises for outstanding co t irnco butions to the building of a healthy business climate and community. • NOMINATIONS: Open to business enterprises of all sizes operating in Oregon including manufacturers, service industries, suppliers and processors. Self-nominations are welcome. 1984 winners are not eligible. BUSINESSES NEED NOT BE INCORPORATED TO QUALIFY AS NOMINEES FOR THE AWARDS. ALL OREGON BUSINESS ENTERPRISES ARE ELIGIBLE. • SELECTION CRITERIA: Three regional winners will be chosen in each of five geographic regions of Oregon: Central; Eastern; Northwestern; Portland Metropolitan; and Southwestern. Each region will have one winner in each of three categories of company size: (5 or fewer employees) ; (6-100 employees) ; (more than 100 employees) . Selection is competitive, by secret ballot, using a weighted scoring system to evaluate the nominee's contribution in economic development and/or community service: • Economic Development: How • Community Service: Examples nominee has developed of active participation in employment opportunities service projects and and improved or stabilized programs leading to civic local or state economic improvement, human welfare climate. Possible examples or environmental enhance- could include response to ment. Support information adversity and/or innova- should specify actual tiveness of product or service and/or project service offered. accomplishments and dates. • DEADLINE: Entry forms must be postmarked no later than Friday, November 1, 1985 and received by the Governor's Office no later than Monday, November 4, 1985. Entries should be sent to Barbara Carey, Governor's Office, State Capitol, Salem, Oregon 97310. • JUDGING: Selection will be made by an impartial panel of judges from various backgrounds and geographic locations. Finalists may be contacted for more information by judging panel. Winners will be notified by Friday, November 15, 1985. • AWARDS: See page two. If you have questions, please contact Barbara Carey at 378-3548 . -1- f The Honorable and Mrs. Victor Atiyeh cordially invite you to join them at the Governor's Corporate Excellence Awards Dinner honoring the 1985 statewide awards recipients Tuesday, December 17, 1985 Crystal Room Westin Benson Hotel S.W. Broadway at Oak Street Portland, Oregon Informal, $22. 00 per person No-Host Cocktails 6:30 p.m. R.S.V.P. by December 2 Dinner 7:30 p.m. 378-3548 • AWARDS: The following companies were the recipients of the first Governor's Corporate Excellence Awards for 1984: Central Region: (Crook, Deschutes, Gilliam, Hood, Jefferson, Klamath, Lake, Sherman, Wasco, Wheeler counties) Hanel Lumber Company, Hood River Mount Bachelor, Inc. , Bend Eastern Region: (Baker, Grant, Harney, Malheur, Morrow, Umatilla, Union, Wallowa counties) Kinzua Corporation, Heppner Ore-Ida Foods, Inc. , Ontario Northwestern Region: (Benton, Clatsop, Columbia, Lincoln, Linn, Marion, Polk, Tillamook, Yamhill counties) A-Dec (Austin Dental Equipment Company) , Inc. , Newberg Hewlett-Packard Company, Corvallis Portland Metropolitan Region: (Clackamas, Multnomah, Washington counties) Gage Industries, Inc. , Lake Oswego Tektronix, Inc. , Beaverton Southwestern Region: (Coos, Curry, Douglas, Jackson, Jefferson, Lane counties) Country Campers, Inc. , Junction City Roseburg Lumber Company, Roseburg -2- ` ' SEPTEMBER 24' 1985 TDCARD DOWNTOWN MEETING NAME REPRESENTING KEPT INFORMED BE INVOLVED H. P. Vermilye TV Glass & Health Habit Yes Yen Don Hanson Tigard Cleaners Yeo Yeo Mary Gross Tigard Times Yeo Yen Jeanne Caswell Tigard Chamber Yes Yes Dee Dee Harrington The Oregonian Yea Yeo Pat 8eylund Tigard Promotions, Inc Yea Yeo Betty Johnson Johnson Bldg. Yes J. R. Gulley ValIy Auto Parts Yes Vic Kaiser One—Hour Martinizing Yes Yes Doug Martell Doug's Big A Auto Parts Yes Paul E. Miller Martinizing Building Yes Yes Thomas J. Sullivan Tigard Trans. Ad. Comm. Yes Possibly Dennis Thompson Tigard Car Wash/Arco Yes Possibly Steve Richmond Tigard Tire Factory Yes Yes Louis R. Bell Tigard Vacuum Yes Maybe Stene Mozinxki Robert Randall Co. Yes Geraldine Ball Self Yes Roger Sorg Self Yes Emanuel Sorg Self Yes Bill Duff Tigard Shoe Repair Yen Yes J. 8 Bishop Self Yes Yes (100hP) - North end of Downtown Remove the State' s trees Increase Vicibility of Downtonw - Signs to identify Downtown - Sign Code Restrictions - Paint buildings attractive color - City should maintain parks - Billboards should removed - Need some limited time parking and meters - 20 minutes and 2 hours - between Manila Express and Burnham - Off-street parking needed - Park and ride lot for Tri-Met - Roof toop parking off Pacific Highway - Police should enforce parking regulations downtown - Police should review or survey traffic speed on Main Street - is there a problem? - Review landscaping requirements in Downtown - Off ramp from Pacific with coordination of lights/buses - Keep the angle parking as it controls speed - Post Office should provide more mail drop boxes at convenient places - Extend offramp to Electric Ave. (over Commercial) - Traffic jam at Post Office - Improve access to U. S. Bank - Access to and from Main Street - Scoffins - Main Street bridge needs to be improved as trucks are too heavy Appearance of Silver Building must be improved. It is the most visible problem and is not kept up WHERE? - Explore funding sources - Grar-its to property owners for improvement - Public Improvements - i._.I.D. - SDC' s Lotter - Main Street Program - Downtown Merchants Association - Small. business aid from State -- low interest ~ ~ Page 2 — City — devote time — Chamber — possible part time staff time to work with a committee — City group — Downtown — A 6owntwon committee — Organize group to speak for the area to: — City — State — Funding Next Meeting — Wednesday, 6:30 P.M. October 23' 1905 — Tigard Community Center. (1006p) SEPTEMBER 24, 1086 TIGARD DOWNTOWN MEETING NAME REPRESENTING KEPT INFORMED BE INVOLVED H. P. Vermilye TV Glass & Health Habit Yeo Yes Don Hanson Tigard Cleaners Yes Yes Mary Gross Tigard Times Yea Yea Jeanne Caswell Tigard Chamber Yew Yeo Dee Dee Harrington The Oregonian Yes Yes Pat Beylun6 Tigard Promotions, Inc Yea Yes Betty Johnson Johnson Bldg. Yes J. R. Gulley Vally Auto Party Yes Vic Kaiser One—HuurMartinizing Yes Yea Doug Martell Doug' s Big A Auto Parts Yes Paul E. Miller Martinizing Building Yes Yes Thomas J. Sullivan Tigard Trans. Ad. Comm. Yeo Possibly Dennis Thompson Tigard CarWaoh/Arco Yeo Possibly Steve Richmond Tigard Tire Factory Yea Yes Louis R. Bell Tigard Vacuum Yes Maybe Steve Mozinoki Robert Randall Co. Yes Geraldine Ball Self Yes Roger Sorg Self Yes Emanuel Sorg Self Yen Bill Duff Tigard Shoe Repair Yea Yes J. B. Bishop Self Yen Yen (1906P) September 30, 1985 c' 1 i OF T'FAPM WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON Thank you for attending the Tigard Economic Development Committee meeting on September 24 concerning the downtown area. Your input was extremely valuable to me and the Committee members as we formulate our ideas about how to proceed. I have attached a copy of the notes which were taken at the meeting for your information. The notes may be helpful in collecting your thoughts concerning the following: 1. What are the problems or concerns which should be looked at that affect the downtown area? 2. Who should be involved in the program? 3. What should we do next? We will hold a second meeting on Wednesday, October 23, 1985 at 6:30 P.M. at the Community Center. Please plan to attend and provide us with more input. Please also share the information which we provided and your assessment of the meeting with other property owners and business people in the area. Any assistance which you can give to get your fellow business people to attend the next meeting will be appreciated. A Sincerely, William A. Monahan, Director, Community Development Encls. (WAM:br/1917P-1935P) 12755 S.W. ASH P.O. BOX 23397 TIGARD, OREGON 97223 PH:639-4171 H. P. Vermilye TV Glass & Health Habit 12215 S.W. Main Street Tigard, OR 97223_ Don Hannon Tigard Cleaners 12519 S.W. Main Street Tigard, OR 07223_ Mary Gross Tigard Times 9730 SW Cascade Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223_ Jeanne Caswell. Tigard Chamber of Commerce 12006 S.W. Pacific Hwy . Tigard, OR 97223_ Bee Dee Harrington The Oregonian 10246 SW Parkway Portland' OR 97225_ Pat Beylund Tigard Promotions, Inc. 12995 S.W. Pacific Hwy. Tigard, OR 07223_ Betty Johnson Tigard Feed & Seed 12355 SW Main Street Tigard, OR 07223_ J. R. Gulley Valley Auto Party 12662 S.W. Main Street Tigard, OR 07223_ Vic Kaiser One—Hour Martinizing 12156 S.W. Main Street Tigard, OR 07223_ Doug Martell Doug' s Big A Auto Parts 12175 S.W. Main Street Tigard, OR 97223_ Paul E. Miller Martinizing Building 12165 S.W. Main Street Tigard, OR 07223_ Thomas J. Sullivan, Attorney P.O. Box 23804 Tigard' OR 97223_ Dennis Thompson Tigard Car Wash/Arco 12485 S.W. Main Street Tigard, OR 97223_ Steve Richmond Tigard Tire Factory 12533 S.W. Main Street Tigard' OR 07223_ Louis R. Bull Tigard Vacuum Sales & Service 12448 S.W. Main Street Tigard, OR 07223_ Steve Mozinaki Robert Randall Co. 9500 S.W. Bmrbur Blvd. Portland, Oregon Bill Duff Tigard Shoe Repair 12430 S.W. Main Street Tigard' OR 97223 Geraldine L. Ball 11515 SW 91st Avenue Tigard, OR 07223_ Roger Sorg 14866 SW 72n6 Tigard, OR 07223_ Emanuel Sorg 14865 SW 72nd Tigard, OR 97Z23_ J. B. Bishop 18505 SW Darbur Blvd. #303 Portland' OR 97210_ MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Members of the Economic Development Committee September 10, 1985 FROM: William A. Monahan, Director, Community Development SUBJECT: Next Meeting — September 17, 1085 Attached is the agenda for our next meeting, and copies of newspaper ado which should interest you. Please remember that we have other important dates coming up. They are: — Workshop with City Council at Fowler Junior High. — Bus tour of economic development sites. Meet at City Hall. Tuesdqj_� Se tember 24 1985 — 6:00 P.M. — Downtown improvement meeting at Tigard Community Center 12495 S.W. Ash, (the corner of Commercial & Ash) Please let my secretary, Billie Rawlings know if you cannot attend any of these meetings, (WAM:br/1827P) ~ MINUTES TZQARD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE September 17, 1085 Meeting 7:30 A.M. — Pioneer Pies Members Present: Jim Corliss, Dick Cochran' Kathy BuJny' John Savory, Susan Clark' Tony 0rlan6ini, and Pat Kennedy Others Present: Mark Padgett, Bill Monahan The minutes of the August 20' 1985 meeting were reviewed and accepted as written. John Savory was elected unanimously as chairman and conducted the remainder of the meeting. The Committee discussed the format for the downtown improvement meeting scheduled for September 24. The meeting will be coordinated by John, Bill and Jeanne Camwell, The Committee role will be described as well as the action taken to date. Questionnaire results will he presented, then the participants asked to provide their input. Funding sources will also be discussed such an lottery proceeds, local improvement districts, and systems development charge proceeds, and zoning. John suggested that the Committee's role in the downtown should be to prompt action and coordinate the efforts of the property owners and businesses . The Committee should take an advisory rule. The 1985-86 Action Plan was discussed briefly. Goals from the 1084-86 plan will be revised and continued. Bill will bring back a revised plan for Committee reioew and adoption. Mark Padgett presented the Washington County Fee Per Trip proposal. The proposal, if adopted, would standardize the contribution by developers for the construction of transportation systems to accomodate increased development needs. The concept would ideally create a system of payment where a fee is paid by a developer which reflects the inpact of a particular development on the system, The County hopes that cities will also adopt the system to create a uniform oynten) in place of varied systems development charge programs , Development activity woul6 enoourage other new development with the improved public improvements. Mark cited examples of where the new system could result in further, new development while under the old nystem. A developer could be precluded from 6evelopment. He pointed out that the Metropolitan Home Builders have supported the program but want the prospective home owner to pay it� Tony expressed concern about the method used to establish the standard fees as it is apparent the fees for retail development were rounded up. Jim suggested that BilI work up a couple of examples of how the proposed costs would relate to existing fees in Tigard. The Bus Trip scheduled for the 19th was discussed. The group will meet at 7:00 A.M. at City Hall for the one hour tour. � ~ September 17, 1985 Economic Development Committee Meeting Minutes Page 2 Bill presented the City' s brochure prepared for distribution at the Japanese Mayor' s Conference in Portland. The brochure illustrates Tigar6' s cnmmittment to encouraging new development. Tony informed the Committee that TVEDC will hold its quarterly membership meeting on Monday, September 38. Committee members were invited to attend. Bill reported on the joint effort by Washington County and TVEDC to provide economic development coordination. Tigard will be involved. The meeting adjourned at 9:00 A.M. The next meeting will be held on October l§' 1985 at Pioneer Pies . (WAM:br/1081P) OREGON PUBLIC WORKS INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM PROPOSED 1986 ALLOCATION INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS DIVISION OREGON PUBLIC WORKS INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS DIVISION PROPOSED WORK SCHEDULE 1 . Furnish draft rules/handbook to August 30, 1985 eligible municipalities 2. Provide time for comment September 1-18 3. Public Hearings La Grande September 17 LaGrande City Hall , Council Chambers 9:00 AM 1000 Adams Ave. LaGrande, OR 97850 Phone: 963-6914 corner of Fourth St & Adams Eugene September 17 Eugene City Hall #1 , Council Chambers 10:00 AM 777 Pearl Street Eugene, OR 97401 Phone: 687-5010 Portland September 18 Dept. of Environmental Quality 9:00 AM 522 SW Fifth, Room 1400 Portland, OR 97204 Phone: 229-5395 Grants Pass September 18 Rodeway Inn - Room #118 9:00 AM 111 Agnes Avenue Grants Pass, OR 97526 Phone: 476-1117 I-5 Exit 55 4. Public Works Advisory Committee reviews September 26 program/rules 5. Applicants ' Handbook mailed to municipalities October 8 -continued- B11:n 1 :60871 IRD:08/19/85 ' 6. Applicants ' workshops Salem October 16 State Capitol Hearing Homn "D" 9:00 AM Court Street Salem, OR 97310 Phone: 378-3732 La Grande October 16 LaGrGnUe City Hall , Council Chambers 9:00 AM 1000 Adams Ave. LaGrande, OR 97850 Phone: 963-6914 corner of Fourth 8t & Adams Roseburg October 17 Roseburg City Hall , Council Chambers 9:00 AM 900 SE Douglas St. Roseburg, OR Phone: 440-4237 (Right next to the County Courthouse) Portland October 9:0U 1120 SW Fifth Avenue - 2nd Flooi I rtland, OR 91204 Po Phone: 226-3161 7, Round l Applications accepted December 2-13, 1985 Awards February 14, 1986 B. Round 2 Applications accepted (if necessary) June 2-13. 86 Awards August 15, 1986 8P:n| :6087F lRU:08/19/85 PROPOSED Page I OREGON PUBLIC WORKS INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS DIVISION I . PURPOSE The 1985 State Legislature has found that the improvement, expansion, and new construction of the State's infrastructure may provide the basic framework for continuing and expanding economic activity in the state, thereby providing jobs and economic opportunity for the people of Oregon. House Bill 2938 sets forth the Legislature's objectives. The Oregon Public Works Infrastructure Program, administered by the Intergovernmental Relations Division (IRD) will make loans and grants to, eligible applicants in order to promote the primary economic developmot goals o a e: - Support projects that will in rPacr- the nnmhnr F-mily Wage jobs in this state. - Prom in small cities heavily dependent on a single industry. - Emphasize development in underdeveloped rural areas of this state. - Utilize the a ucational resources available at institutions of higher educafion. - Support the development of the state's small businesses, especially businesses owned by women and me Fe rs of minority groups. - Encourage the use of Oregon's human and natUral resources in endeavors which harness Oregon s economic comparative a vantages. - Encourage projects that assist businesses selling goods and services in markets for which national or internationa comoe ltlon exists. II . TYPES OF LOANS AND GRANTS IRD MAY MAKE -- Infrastructure construction projects relateLd to LOANS FOR: econom n ion o_r creation of jobs. -- Purrha&aof t1aad icciiad by municipalities for infrastructure projects related to economic deve oilmen . - Also, IRD may sell Revenue Bonds on behalf of a municipality to finance infrastructure projects related to economic development and the retention or creation of jobs . BP:cik:0353C IRD:08/13/85 p Page 2 lRU MAY MAK[ Infrastructure construction projects related to GRANTS FOR: economic development and the retention or creation of 'obs . - Partial repayment of bonds for m proposed infrastructure project related to economic development' - Technical assistance to municipalities of less than 5000 residents to assist in preliminary legal , planning, fiscal and economic investigations, reports and studies to determine economic and engineering feasibility of the project. l[l . Municigalities defined as: City, county, port incorporated under ORS ///'OOO and 777'050; the Port of Portland created by ORS 778'010; a metropolitan service district created under ORS Chapter 368 or a domestic water supply district organized under ORS Chapter 264. IV. ELIGIBLE AND INELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES ZLIGIBLE - Englineering and architectural reports, studies, ACTIVT?l[S surveys, plans, working drawings MM specifications NECESSARY IN THE CONSTRUCTION of the infrastructure project. _ Impca-vem-ot, expaArio -and new construction of the state's sewage treatment works- orK s, wor ir c� a�nexEan 1� Infrastructure projects are defined as follows: - A project for the construction of sewage treatment works, solid waste disposal sites, water supply works, roads, public transportation or other facilities that comprise the physical foundation for industrial and commercial activity. - A project, in cooperation with the Department of Transportation, for the acquisition, reconstruction, rehabilitation, operation and maintenance of on abandoned railroad line or railroad line that has been designated by the owner and operator thereof as subject to abandonment within a three-year period pursuant to federal law and regulations governing abandonment of common currier railroad lines . 81-c }k :8]5][ lkU :08/13/86 Public Works Infrastructure Program Page 3 - "Public transportation" includes public depots, public parking, public docks , public wharves, railroads and airport facilities . - "Roads" includes : Ways described as streets, highways, throughways or alleys; road related structures that are in the right of way such as tunnels, culverts or similar structures; and structures that provide for continuity of the right of way such s bri - "Sewage treatment works" includes all facilities necessary for collecting, pumping, treating and disposing of sanitary or storm sewage. - "Solid waste disposal site" has the meaning given to the term "disposal site" by ORS 459.005(8) . - "Water supply works" includes all facilities necessary for tapping natural sources of domestic and industrial water, treating and protecting the quality of the water and transmitting it to the point of sale to any public or private agency for domestic, municipal and industrial water supply service. <4--1NELIGI�j.F� - A nistrative cost osts for PRELIMINARY planning, VITIES le al , fiscal and economic i a an les o ermine economic and engineering feasibility o e proJec p anning cos s sha e n their entirety by the municipality. (Exception: Municipalities of less than 5000 residents may apply for technical assistance grants of up to $10,000 to assist with these costs. ) V. FUNDS AVAILABLE IRD will receive an $18,202,000 legislative appropriation from Lottery proceeds estimated Co be received over a two year period beginning July 1 , 1985. IRD also has the authority to sell $100 million in bonds for infrastructure projects. VI . MAXIMUM AWARDS - Maximum Grant - $1 million (cannot exceed 85 percent of total - Maximum Technical Assistance Grant - $10,000 - Maximum combination of loans and grants per project - $10 million IRD may issue not more than 50 percent of the appropriation in grants a d will-develop standards 7677a7rermiFing the maximum proportion of any p ran s a minimum, those standards must require a ar er percentage of total project costs in the form of grants to municipalities with the greatest economic need . BP:clk :0353C IRD:08/13/85 Public Works Infrastructure Proo ram Page .4 VII . APPLICATION INFORMATION 1 . Applications will be accepted at the following times : Accept Applications Dec . 2-13, 1985 June 2-13, 1986 if necessary Award Projects Feb. 14 August 15 2. An applicant may be awarded no more than one project per year. 3. Infrastructure application requirements will include: - Descri tion of the nature and purposes of theproposed inZEatractate project, inc uding the need for t e project and the reason y e project is in the pu' is in eres . - A feasibilit s of the proposed infrastructure project incluu i g: (a) Aarmor plat showing the general nature, location and extent of the proposed improvement and the land to be assessed for the payment of any part of the cost thereof . (b) Pref imi�n .�ias.ar� �ri� estimates of the work to be done. (c) An stimate ost of the improvement, including any legal and engineering table thereto. (d) An estimate of the uu41-r.9st (per square foot, per front foot, or whatever unit of cost is to be used) of the improvement to the specially benefited properties. (e) A recommendation as to them�t,hud of sessment to be used t-Q arrive at a fair a Dortionment of the whole or any portion o e cost of the improvement to t e properties sp ; e or to other residents o e municipality. (f) The description of each lot, parcel of land or portion thereof to be specially benefited, with the names of the record owners thereof and, when readily available, the names of the contract purchasers thereof . (g) A re c atP of interest. Sources of funds other than those in the Special Public Works Fund which are proposed to be used for the infrastructure project and whether any other monies are available or have been sought for the project. BP:clk :0353C 1RD:08113t85 Public Works Infrastructu, e Program Page 5 - A descri inesand/or company, if any, planning to utilize the infrastru e reasons for expansion and location. - A marketing plan which must identify prospective customers or markets . - Le ts, if any, which address the project specifically and assure that the necessary funds will be available. - Information on the jobs to be created, if any. - Interest rate and term of loan from the State (if applicable. ) - Timg line,, and mil s n c fnr the development of the infrastructure and the business utilizing the improvements, if any. - Applicants must suhmit an nriainal and three copies of all applications. - Each applicant musthoId oneublic hearing on each application. This hearing is in addition to-Me—local government budget process. The hearing must be held prior to submittal of the application to the State, and with enough advance notice to ensure adequate citizen participation. The notice must appear in a local newspaper of general circulation in the non-legal section. In addition, the notice must be posted in three conspicuous public places. Thehearing must be held at a special public meeting solely for this D�rpos o a general council or commission meeting.) The applicant may hold more hearings if desired. Minutes of the public hearing must. accompany the application. 4. Technical Assistance grants of up to $10,000 will be available to municipalities of less than 5,000 residents for economic and engineering feasibility studies (as described above) . 5. No joint applications will be accepted. VIII . APPLICATION PROCEDURE A. Applications will be assigned to a staff member and reviewed for completeness and threshold criteria. State agencies may be requested to review and comment on applications. B. Upon receipt of an application, IRO shall determine whether the feasibility study is satisfactory. If it is determined to be unsatisfactory, IRD may: - Reject the application. - Require additional information. BP:clk :0353C IR0:08/13/85 Public Works InfrastrucLure Program Page _b - Make, with the agreement of the municipality, such revisions of the feasibility study as it considers necessary to make the plans for the proposed project satisfactory. C . Applications will be rated and ranked by the staff . D. An Advisory Committee will review the rating and ranking. The ranking will be forwarded to the Administrator of IRO. E. Funding decisions will be made by the Administrator. Announcement of awards will be made by the Governor. F . IRD will notify applicants of their funding status approximately 60 days after the closing date for applications . A compliance statement, grant contract, program schedule and budget forms will be sent to each applicant whose project is selected for funding. IX. CONDITIONS Loan term and interest rates are to be determined by the applicant but the term cannot exceed years and the interest rate cannot be less than percent per annum. A longer term may be approved under special circumstances acceptable to IRD. Other conditions applicable to loans, grants and bonds will be developed by IRO. X. SELECTION PROCESS Grants and loans will be made on a competitive basis. T -three ercent of the e Thirty-three percen o the monies are available �foronurban projects. The remainin th' - ent of the mon' fustrongest prod ec s in either category. The appropriate category shall be assigned by where a majority of the beneficiaries (job recipients) come from. Urban projects are those located in whole or in part in Portland, Salem, Eugene, Springfield, Medford and surrounding areas as defined by the Census Bureau. If a sufficient number of strong applications are not received in a particular category, in any funding round, IRD reserves the right to hold the remaining funds for the next funding round . A. Threshold criteria - IRD must find that: 1 . The proposed infrastructure project is feasible, and adequate prov Mon has made for the reoavment olf any bonds or loans provided for-the BP:clk :0353C IRD:08/13/85 Public Works Infrastructure Program Page 1 2. The proposed infrastructure project is situated in an area in which economic developmentis prevented or su s an is y restricted by lack of adequate sewage reatme works, solid wa"s�e his�osal— �rs?u�works, roa s, pu lic transnor_> �sies�, wa t a comprise e physical foundation for industrual and commercial activity; 3. The proposed infrastructure project is situated in a city or county with a com and use plan a allows industrial an commercial development of a type and scale that is sulticient to repay The cost of TMe project; 4. A high probability exists for industrial or commercial deve opmen or both, of the properties served by the infrasT7U=e project; 5. The munici ality has provided as part of the security for repayment o oans o available THrougi s pro9rdm,,_ prOV151On5 Tor Dayments 7romany owners of property sproAect w �c are sufficient, when considered with other security, to assure repayment of bonds and loans made available through this program; 6. The municipality is wi11in and able to enter into a contract with IR or repaymen o oans and/or bonds. 7. The a�nln ican"t must halre;-er demnnctrate chili y to secure the administrative capacity to undertake and complete the project. B. The app icant must certify it will comply with all State regulations- and requirements. 9. The applicant must ensure that additional resources_ needed to com Tete theproject are a ma a avai able. If the latter, then the award of the grant will be conditional . B. Com iteria for both Infrastructure and Technical Assistance Proje s 1 . Probability of Success Points a. Firm business commitment, 500 or b. High probability of success 1 ) Site advantages present (water, sewer, etc . ) up to 125 points 2) Community advantages present (utilities , schools, transportation, higher education, other community facilities) up to 125 points 3) Letter of interest/inquiries up to 50 points BP:clk:0353C IRD:08/13/85 Public Works lnfrastructu Pro ram Page 8 2. Benefits Points a. Family wage jobs created 20 b. Business with national or international markets for goods and services (primary industry) 50 C. Cost per permanent jobs created 40 d . Business owned by minority or women 10 e. Small business 10 f . Number of permanent jobs created 40 g. New jobs per population 10 h. Utilization of local educational resources 10 i . Utilization of local labor and resources 10 3. Municipal Need a. Single industry dependance 50 b. Underdeveloped rural area 20 C. Unemployment rate 50 d. Lack of adequate facilities 50 e. Out migration 30 4. Other a. Readiness to proceed 50 b. Leveraged funds 50 Total 1 ,000 XI. PROGRAM INFORMATION A. Projects overlapping municipal boundaries must have a cooperation agreement. B. The length of a project may not exceed two years. C. Applications for job retention must show that without Public Works funds , jobs will indeed be lost. The way in which this can be shown is through documented proof of imminent layoffs. D. All projects must be consistent with local comprehensive plans. E. A Special Public Works Advisory Committee will assist and advise IRD in the administration of this program with special emphasis on rules, policies and general evaluation of the performance of the program. BP:clk :0353C IRD:08/13/85 Public Works Infrastructure Program Page 9 F. Appeals of local government decisions must be made at the local level . The IRD Administrator will consider appeals of its funding d cisi y the overnment may appeal . An application which would have been funded but fora technical error in ranking will be funded as soon as sufficient Public Works funds become available, providing the situation which prompted the application still exists. G. Contracts must be signed by the highest elected official and reru_rned to IRD within 60 days of air . H. Recipients will be monitored by IRD and must maintain records sufficient for mon' orin . I . Program amendments must have prior approval of IRD if they change the cost, scope, location, objectives, or time frame of the approved activities or beneficiaries. Failure to gain prior approval for amendments may result in sanctions. Amendments which affect the project rating under the original selection criteria will be re-rated and re-ranked. The amendment must rate equal to or greater than the lowest rating received by a funded project during that cycle of ratings; an additional public hearing may be required. J, Audits must be conducted in_ r.pmpIdAnce with Oregon Municipal Audit Law (ORS 194 et sec) . K. The Administrator of IRD may waive non-statutory requirements. L. Recaptured funds are those which are returned to the State through close-out of the project, termination for cause, or other means. Funds recaptured will be added to the Public Works Fund and dispersed through the regular award process. M. Any money not used for approved projects must be returned to the State. N, Sanctions The State may bar a recipient from applying for Public Works grants, withhold unallocated funds or other State funds (such as State Shared Revenue) , require return of unexpended funds or require repayment of expended funds under the following conditions: 1 . None of the project activities have begun within six months after grant award; or 2. Private party agreement is not legally binding within six months of the grant award; or 3. State statutory regulations have not been met; or BP:clk :0353C IRD:08/13/85 Public Works Infrastruct_ s Program Page 10 4 . There is a significant deviation from the grant contract funded activities; or 5. There has been a finding that significant corrective actions are necessary to protect the integrity of the project funds, and those corrective actions are not, or will not be, made within a reasonable time. 6. Recipients default on loan or bond payments in this program. No action will be taken by the State until the recipient has been notified in writing and has been given a reasonable time to respond and correct the deficiencies noted. Additional sanctions will be included in all security investments. 8P:clk:0353C IRD:08/13/85 Urbanized Areas Page 11 Junction City Cohurt; I` i_ COBURG I SANFA Marcola CL'ARA RIVER NORTH SPRINGFIELD ROAD SPRINGFIELD Eugene EUGENE �< J Springfield J V�u�gene Springfield Pleasant Hill �loweII LANE - \ COUNTY Creswell i ( Medford -1 I Southeaster �t> CENTRAL Jackson KEIZER ` DINT WH TECITY Z HAYESVILLE Southwest Dallas Jackson ( r r Salem ,i Salem E J�KSONVILLE FOUR CORNERS t J' N SA EM 3 f Southeast SOUTH �r�a J ti Jackson MEDFORD PHOENIX Southwest Jackson `� Zi Medford f SCALE �`-._.� TALENT `-' AUMSVILLE o z 4Kilometers L Monmouth- TURNER E 1L -. _J .JACKSON � �` Jefferson 0 �__t__�_i___-._ _aMues COUNTY \ � Ashland Independence MAP LEGEND SYMBOLS TYPE STYLES GEOGRAPHIC AREAS SYMBOLS GEOGRAPHIC AREAS — — MEXICO Foreign country Open six spoked asterisk following place name indicates the place is coextensive with a county subdivrs,on The Ali —---— IOWA State ' county subdivision name is shown only when it differs - — DANE Subject SMSA County from that of the place 1 —..-— POWER County not part of subject SMSA Solid eight-spoked asterisk following an incorporated Locust County subdivision place name indicates the place is treated as a county subdivision for census purposes - SILAS Incorporated place I COMPONENTS OF URBANIZED LAND AREA P[0190 Census designated place Pyf31111t American Indian reservation M Incorporated place I.nkr H'�nprn Census designated place Major water feature Nota All political boundaries ere as of January I,1980 Other area. Boundaries of small areas may not be depicted exactly due to scale of map Where boundaries coincide. boundary symbol of higher level geographic area is shown RkjRE AU Or I Nf Cf NSUS a.......ni of C.....in.'r ct' NUMBER OF INHABITANTS 39 34 OREGON Urbanized Areas Page 12 -Q � v��P n a n C:) _ ��N a ¢ v, z >i W C7 Y C m >H w EOf J (�•� � rw �'A o I N I C OO O > L LAJ = O z � N me o m 2 a Y CD LU- o ZP cc z� z W= �" O WJ D C-) = Z ¢N W "n 47) CEJ O W.� -,O WJp= 0[ of Ud U J 44 ICL. cxI cD> Uz CL `c� rs.J 1 0 Q N cn C/') 1 - �- CD o L _v _ Y j o �— o M�li,.,�r,ioh � a, U D � Q' JC, _ w CC 00 = w .� --rte f Z OO1 } NdwoNlinw m z_i NOl�NIHSdN1 Z C:) v) a co r 3i f o m v r- cc w o_ 2 w 3- O C W O �- C) N .- V w U E _. u v o ° z v cr c w m y o JUPTf?ffi Of INHABIT ANTS OREGON 39-3E. 63rd OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY--1995 Reguiar Session Enrolled House Bill 2938 Sponsored by COMMITTEE ON TRADE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER ..............77.G____.... AN ACT Relating to economic development',appropriating money; limiting expenditures-,and declaring an emergency. Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon: SECTION 1.(1)The Legislative Assembly finds that the improvement,expansion and new construction of the state's sewage treatment works, water supply works, roads and public transportation provides the basic framework for continuing and expanding economic activity in this state, thereby providing jobs and economic opportunity for the people of Oregon. (2)Since municipalities in this state often suffer from a lack of available financing for such projects,it is the purpose of this Act to provide financial assistance in order that they may construct, improve and repair those facilities that are essential for supporting continuing and expanded economic activity. It is the intent of the Legislative Assembly,by providing that assistance,to stimulate industrial growth and commercial enterprise and to promote employment opportunities in Oregon. SECTION 2.As used in this Act,unless the context requires otherwise: (1)"Division"means the Intergovernmental Relations Division of the Executive Department. (2)"Municipality-means a city,a county,a port incorporated under ORS 777.010 and 777.050,the Port of Portland created by ORS 778.010,a metropolitan service district organized under ORS chapter 268 or a domestic water supply district organized under ORS chapter 264. (3)"Infrastructure project" means: (a)A project for the construction of sewage treatment works,solid waste disposal sites,water supply works, roads, public transportation or other facilities that comprise the physical foundation for industrial and commercial activity. (b) A project, in cooperation with the Department of Transportation, for the acquisition, reconstruction, rehabilitation,operation and maintenance of an abandoned railroad line or railroad line that has been designated by the owner and operator thereof as subject to abandonment within a three-year period pursuant to federal la" and regulations governing abandonment of common carrier railroad lines. (c)A project for the construction or improvement of facilities owned by any county fair located in a county having a population of less than 400,000 or owned by those special events described in ORS 462.280(1)(e)(A)to (H). (d)An urban center development project. (e)A project to improve the commercial value of timber located on state-owned lands. (4)"Public transportation- includes public depots, public parking, public docks, public wharves, railroads and airport facilities. (5)"Roads"includes: (a)Ways described as streets, highways, throughways or alleys: (b) Road related structures that are in the right of v.a} such as tunnels. culverts or sin;ifar structures,and (c)Structures that provide for corinnuit} of the right of way such as hr!dges (6)"Sewage treatment works' in,iudes all facilities necessary for collei trig, tre.+ung aid djsp,i,ing of sanitary or storm sewage. (7)"Solid waste disposal site"has the meaning given to the term "disposal site" by ORS 459.005(8). (8) "Water supply works" includes all facilities necessary for tapping natural sources of domestic and industrial water, treating and protecting the quality of the water and transmitting it to the point of sale to any public or private agency for domestic, municipal and industrial water supply service. (9)"Urban infrastructure projects"includes all those located in whole or in pan in the urbanized portion of a metropolitan statistical area.as designated by the United States Census Bureau. (10)"Nonurban infrastructure projects" includes all those not located in whole or in part in the urbanized portion of a metropolitan statistical area. SECTION 2a.(1)For purposes of this Act,the total project costs of an infrastructure project do not include costs for preliminary planning or legal, fiscal and economic investigations, reports and studies to determine the economic and engineering feasibility of the project. Such planning costs shall be borne in their entirety by the municipality. (2) The engineering and architectural reports, studies, surveys, designs, plans, working drawings and specifications necessary in the construction of the infrastructure project shall be eligible for financial assistance under this Act,including technical assistance grants as specified in paragraph(d)of subsection(I)of section 13 of this Act. Proposals for technical assistance grants shall be processed under sections 3 to 10 and 14 in the same manner as other project proposals. SECTION 2b. Notwithstanding subsection(2)of section 2 of this Act,a county service district established under ORS chapter 451, a mass transit district organized under ORS 267.010 to 267.390 and a transportation district organized under ORS 267.510 to 267.650 shall be considered a municipality for the purpose of receiving financial assistance under this Act for an infrastructure project defined in paragraph (b) of subsection (3) of section 2 of this Act. SECTION 3.(1)There is created the Special Public Works Fund.All moneys credited to the Special Public Works Fund are appropriated continuously and shall be used for the purposes outlined in this Act. The Special Public Works Fund shall consist of the Special Public Works Loan Account,established by section l 1 of this Act, the Special Public Works Grant Account, established by section 13 of this Act, the Special Public Works Debt Service Account,established by section 15 of this Act and the Special Public Works Security Reserve Account, established by section 16 of this Act. (2)Moneys in the Special Public Works Fund,with the approval of the State Treasurer,may be invested as provided by ORS 293.701 to 293.776, 293.810 and 293.820 and the earnings from such investments shall be credited to the appropriate account in the Special Public Works Fund. (3)The Intergovernmental Relations Division of the Executive Department shall be the agency for the State of Oregon for the administration of the Special Public Works Fund. (4)There is created the Special Public Works Advisory Committee to assist and advise the Intergovernmen- tal Relations Division in the administration of the Special Public Works Fund.The assistance and advice of the advisory committee shall consist of but not be limited to advice on rules and policies and general evaluation of the performance of the program. The advisory committee shall consist of local government officials, represen- tatives of the banking community and other representatives of the private sector.The committee members shall receive compensation for their expenses in attending meetings. SECTION 4.(1)With the advice of the Special Public Works Advisory Committee,the Intergovernmental Relations Division of the Executive Department shall adopt rules and policies for the administration of the Special Public Works Fund. Insofar as practicable, the division's rules shall provide that infrastructure projects that meet the fallowing criteria receive priority for financial assistance: (a)Support projects that will increase the number of family,wage jobs in this state. (b) Promote economic recovery in small cities heavily dependent on a single industry. (c) Emphasize development in underdeveloped nurai areas of this state. (d) Utilize the educational resources available at institutions of higher education. (e) Support the development of the state's small businesses, especially businesses owned by women and nwrnhers of-minority groups. I1110lied Flouse Bill 293h Page 2 (f) Encourage the use of Oregon's human and natural resource,, in endeavors which harness Oregon's economic comparative advantages. (g) Encourage projects that assist businesses selling goods and services in markets for which national or international competition exists. (2)(a) The Intergovernmental Relations Division shall manage the Special Public Works Fund and any expenditures from its accounts and transfers between its accounts so as to retain not less than 26 percent of the initial value of amounts appropriated to the fund.The division may not reduce the value of the fund to less than 50 percent of the initial value of amounts appropriated to the fund unless the administrator of the division finds that: (A)The division has operated a loan program for not less than six months;and (B) Insufficient approvable applications have been submitted to fully utilize available loan funds. (b) The division shall determine the value of the fund by summing the value of the fund's short term net assets and long term net assets. Short term assets and liabilities shall be valued at cost. long term assets and liabilities shall be valued at their net present value using an interest rate of five percent. (c) The division shall quarterly certify the value of the fund to the State Treasurer and to the Legislative Committee on Trade and Economic Development. (d) If necessary to insure repayment of bonds issued under this Act, the Intergovernmental Relations Division is authorized to reduce the value of the fund to less than the limit provided in paragraph (a) of this subsection if the division: (A)Finds that without such a reduction in fund value, bonds secured by the fund will be in default; (B)Transfers all available funds in the grant and loan accounts to the debt service account,and (C) Imposes a moratorium on all expenditures from the grant and loan accounts until the requirements of paragraph(a)of this subsection are met. (3)Not more than 100 percent of the total cost of any infrastructure project shall be financed from the Special Public Works Fund. (4)(a)The Intergovernmental Relations Division may,in a periodic competitive evaluation process,obligate during each year to specific projects not more than 75 percent of the moneys in the Special Public Works Fund. (b)The Intergovernmental Relations Division shall reserve not more than 25 percent of the moneys in the Special Public Works Fund for infrastructure projects related to specific proposed private development or expansion opportunities that were not available at the time of any preceding competitive evaluation.These funds may be transferred to the Economic Development Department for allocation.Expenditures under this paragraph shall not be subject to the limitations of subsection(2)of section 23 of this Act. (c)Any funds not expended from moneys reserved under paragraph(b)of this subsection shall be available for competitive allocation in the subsequent competitive allocation process. (5)The division may commit moneys in the Special Public Works Fund or reserve future income to the fund for dispersal in future years under subsection (4)of section 14 of this Act. The division shall commit or reserve moneys under this subsection only after: (a)Allowing for contingencies,and (b) Finding that there will be sufficient unobiigated net income to the fund to make such future payments. Such a finding shall be based on financial plans which are consistent with the financial requirements of subsections(2)and (4)of this section. (6)In assisting local governments with infrastructure projects, the division shall cooperate to the maximum extent possible with other state agencies financing infrastructure projects, including but not limited to the Department of Environmental Quality, the Water Resources Department and the Department of Transporta- tion. SECTION 5. (1) .Any municipality may file an application with the division to obtain financial assistance from the Special Public Works Fund. The application shall be filed in such manner and contain or be accompanied by such information as the division may require. (2)In addition to other requirements prescribed by the division,an application filed under this section shall: (a)Describe the nature and purposes of the proposed infrastructure project,including the need for the project and the reasons why the project is in the public interest. (b)Set forth or be accompanied by a feasibility study of the proposed infrastructure project and an estimate of the costs of construction. Enrolled House Bill 2938 Page 3 (c)State whether ane nronevs other than those in the Special Puhlic Works Fund arc proposed to he used for the infrastructure project and whether any other moneys are available or have been sought for the project. SECTION 6. Upon receipt of an application filed as piostded in section � of this Act the divi,,ion Ghali determine whether the feasihilnv studv set forth in or accompanying the appii-ation is sausfactor}, and if the division determines that it is not satisfactory it may: (I) Reject the application, (2) Require the municipality to submit additional information as may be necessary:or (3) Make, with the agreement of the municipality, such revisions of the feasibility study as it considers necessary to make the plans for the proposed project satisfactory. SECTION 7.The division shall not approve financial assistance from the Special Public Works Fund for an infrastructure project proposed in an application filed under section 5 of this Act unless.after investigation, the division finds that: (1)The proposed infrastructure project is feasible,and adequate provision has been made for the repayment of any bonds or loans provided for the project; (2)The proposed infrastructure project is situated in an area in which economic development is prevented or substantially restricted by a lack of adequate sewage treatment works, solid waste disposal sites, water supply works, roads, public transportation or other facilities that comprise the physical foundation for industrial and commercial activity; (3)The proposed infrastructure project is situated in a city or county with a comprehensive land use plan that allows industrial and commercial development of a type and scale that is sufficient to repay the costs of the project; (4)A high probability exists for industrial or commercial development,or both,of the properties served by the infrastructure project; (5)The municipality has provided as part of the security for repayment of loans or bonds made available through this Act, provisions for payments from any owners of property specially benefited by the infrastructure project which are sufficient when considered with other security to assure repayment of bonds and loans made available through this Act; (6) Moneys in the appropriate accounts of the Special Public Works Fund are or will be available for the infrastructure project; (7)The municipality is willing and able to enter into a contract with the division for repayment as provided in section 8 of this Act;and (8)The proposed infrastructure project is consistent with rules adopted under section 4 of this Act. SECTION 8. If the division approves financial assistance from the Special Public Works Fund for an infrastructure project, the division,on behalf of the state,and the municipality may enter into a contract of not more than$10 million, which shall set forth,among other matters: (1)An estimate of the reasonable cost of the infrastructure project. (2)An agreement by the municipality to proceed expeditiously with,and complete,the project in accordance with plans reviewed and approved by the division. (3) None of the financial assistance provided by the state shall be used for administrative purposes by the municipality. (4)A statement that the liability of the state under the contract is contingent upon the availability of moneys in the Special Public Works Fund for use in the infrastructure project. (5) Such other provisions as the division considers necessary to insure expenditure of the moneys for the purposes set forth in the approved application. SECTION 9. When the division approves financial assistance under this Act for an infrastructure project, the division shall pay moneys for the project from the Special Public Works Fund in accordance with the terms of the contract. SECTION 10.(1) If a municipality fails to comply with a contract entered into under this Act, the division may seek appropriate legal remedies to secure any repayment due the Special Public Works Fund. If any municipality defaults on payments due to the Special Public Works Fund under this Act,the State of Oregon may withhold any amounts otherwise due to the municipality to apply to the indebtedness. (2)Moneys withheld under subsection(1)of this section shall be deposited in the Special Public Works Fund and shall be used to repay any account in the fund from which funds were expended to pay obligations upon which the municipahit, defaulted. Enrolled Nouse Pill '938 Page 4 SECTION 11. (1) There is established in the Special Public Works Fund the Special Public Works Loan Account. All moneys in the Special Public Works Loan Account are continuously appropriated to the Intergovernmental Relations Division of the Executive Department for the following purposes: (a)Administrative expenses of the division in processing applications and investigating proposed infrastruc- ture projects, not to exceed four percent of the value of loans made in that biennium. (b) Loans to municipalities under this Act. (c) Purchase of bonds issued by municipalities which coincide with the purposes and requirements of this Act. (d)Transfers to the Special Public Works Debt Service Account, the Special Public Works Grant Account and the Special Public Works Security Reserve Account. (2)The Special Public Works Loan Account shall consist of (a) Moneys appropriated to the account by the Legislative Assembly. (b) Repayment of loans to municipalities made under this Act, including interest on such moneys. (c) Proceeds from the sale of bonds authorized under this Act. (d)Transfers from the Special Public Works Grant Account,the Special Public Works Debt Service Account and the Special Public Works Security Reserve Account. (e) Repayment of moneys, from any source,of moneys expended from the account to pay obligations upon which a municipality defaulted. SECTION 12,Any contract under section 8 of this Act that includes provisions for a loan of state moneys to a municipality or the purchase of a bond of a municipality by the state shall include: (1)An acknowledgment by the municipality that repayment of the loan is an obligation of the municipality. (2)A plan for repayment by the municipality of moneys borrowed from the Special Public Works Fund for an infrastructure project and interest on those moneys at a rate specified in the contract. The repayment plan: (a)Shall provide for such evidence of debt assurance of,and security for,repayment by the municipality as is considered necessary by the division. (b) Shall set forth the allocation of special assessments or contractual responsibility among the owners of benefited properties for repayment to the municipality of the amount of the loan. (c)Shall provide for repayment during a period which shall not exceed the usable life of the proposed project or 25 years,whichever is less. SECTION 13.(1)There is established in the Special Public Works Fund the Special Public Works Grant Account. All moneys in the Special Public Works Grant Account are continuously appropriated to the Intergovernmental Relations Division of the Executive Department for the following purposes: (a)Administrative expenses of the division in processing applications and investigating proposed infrastruc- ture projects, not to exceed four percent of the value of grants made in that biennium. (b)Grants to municipalities under this Act. (c)Transfers to the Special Public Works Debt Service Account,the Special Public Works Loan Account and the Special Public Works Security Reserve Account. (d)Technical assistance grants to municipalities of less than 5,000 residents of not more than $10,000. No more than $250,000 or one percent of the value of the fund, whichever is less, shall be expended on technical assistance grants. (2)The Special Public Works Grant Account shall consist of- (a) f(a) Moneys appropriated to the fund by the Legislative Assembly. (b) Moneys obtained from the interest earned on the investment of all moneys in the Special Public Works Fund. (c)Transfers from the Special Public Works Loan Account,the Special Public Works Debt Service Account and the Special Public Works Security Reserve Account. (d) Repayment of moneys, from any source,of moneys expended from the account to pay obligations upon which a municipality defaulted. SECTION 14. (1)(a) The maximum amount of any grant to a municipality made from the Special Public Works Grant Account under paragraph(a)of subsection(4)of section 4 of this Act shall not exceed$I million. (b) The maximum amount of any grant to a municipality made from the Special Public Works Grant .Account under paragraph (b)of subsection (4)of section 4 of this Act shall not exceed$4 million. (2) No grant to a municipality shall be made for a project in an amount that exceeds 85 percent of total project costs. Enrolled Douse Bill 2938 Page 5 (3)The division shad dc%elop standards for determining the maximum proportion art :tm project which can he funded by grants. Such standards shall at a minimum pro%idr grant" equalhn;' a larger ,xrcenuage of total project costs fur municipalities with greatest economic need. (4) A grant contract under section 8 of this Act and this section may prcovtdc fur grants on behalf of the municipality on an annual basis in the form of partial repayment to bondholders of amounts owed then,. In such cases.the contract shall provide that moneys are or will be available in the Special Public Works Grant :Account for such annual payments and for the transfer of moneys from the Special Public Works Grant Account to the Special Public Works Debt Service Account to make such payments. SECTION IS. (1) There is established in the Special Public Works Fund the Special Public Works Debt Service Account.All moneys in the Special Public Works Debt Service Account are continuously appropriated to the Intergovernmental Relations Division of the Executive Department for: (a) Payment of bonds as provided in contracts with municipalities under the terms of section 12 of this Act. (b)Transfers to the Special Public Works Loan Account, the Special Public Works Grant Account and the Special Public Works Security Reserve Account.Such transfers shall be limited to moneys not necessary for the purposes outlined in paragraph(a)of this subsection. (c)The payment for insurance premiums for bonds issued under this Act. (2)The Special Public Works Debt Service Account shall consist of: (a)Moneys appropriated to the account by the Legislative Assembly. (b) Moneys transferred to the account from the Special Public Works Grant Account, the Special Public Works Loan Account and the Special Public Works Security Reserve Account. (c)Payments made in respect of infrastructure projects under loan agreements,leases or subleases which are dedicated to payments of bond principal,interest and redemption premium, if any. (d)Repayment of moneys,from any source,of moneys expended from the account to pay obligations upon which a municipality defaulted. SECTION lb.(1)There is established in the Special Public Works Fund the Special Public Works Security Reserve Account. All moneys in the Special Public Works Security Reserve Account are continuously appropriated to the Intergovernmental Relations Division of the Executive Department for: (a)Payment of principal,interest and redemption premium,if any,on bonds sold under sections 17 to 21 of this Act if a municipality defaults on its bond repayments to the Special Public Works Debt Service Account;and (b)Transfers to the Special Public Works Loan Account, the Special Public Works Grant Account and the Special Public Works Debt Service Account. Such transfers shall be limited to moneys not necessary for the purposes outlined in paragraph(a)of this subsection. (2)The Special Public Works Security Reserve Account shall consist of. (a)Moneys that may be appropriated to the account by the Legislative Assembly. (b) Moneys transferred to the account from the Special Public Works Grant Account, the Special Public Works Loan Account and the Special Public Works Debt Service Account. (c)Repayment, from any source,of moneys expended under paragraph(a)of subsection(1)of this section. SECTION 17. (1)The Intergovernmental Relations Division of the Executive Department shall adopt by rule standards by which to determine the eligibility for revenue bond financing under sections 17 to 21 of this Act of infrastructure projects that have qualified under sections 4 to 10 of this Act. (2)Upon determining an infrastructure project eligible for revenue bond financing under sections 17 to 21 of this .Act, the division shall forward the application to the State Treasurer, who shall determine whether to issue revenue bonds. SECTION 18. In addition to any other powers granted by law in relation to an infrastructure project, the division,acting through the State Treasurer or designee may: (1) Pledge and assign to the holders of such bonds or a trustee therefor all or any pan of the moneys paid to the Special Public Works Debt Service. Account, including interest on such moneys, and define and segregate such revenues or provide for the payment thereof to a trustee: (2)Make all contracts._xccute all instruments and do all things necessary or convenient in the exercise of the powers granted by this section,or in the performance of its covenants or duties,or in order to secure the payment of its bonds: and (3) Enter into and perform such contracts and agreements with municipalities as the division may consider proper and feasible for or concerning the planning, construction, installation, lease or other acquisition,and the financing of infrastructure projects. Enrolled House Bill 2938 Page 6 SECTION 19. if the State Treasurer determines that revenue bonds should be issued: (I)The State Treasurer may authorize and issue in the name of the State of Oregon revenue bonds secured by moneys paid to the Special Public Works Debt Service Account including interest on such moneys.to finance or refinance in whole or part the cost of acquisition, construction. reconstruction, improvement or extension of infrastructure projects. The bonds shall be issued in the manner prescribed by ORS chapter 286,and refunding bonds may be issued to refinance such revenue bonds. (2)The State Treasurer shall designate the underwriter,trustee and bond counsel and enter into appropriate agreements with each to carry out the provisions of sections 17 to 21 of this Act. SECTION 20. (1)QRS 280.360 to 280.380 and 280.390 apply to revenue bonds issued under sections 17 to 21 of this Act. (2)The proceeds of revenue bonds issued and sold under sections 17 to 21 of this Act shall be deposited in the Special Public Works Loan Account and used for the payment of loan to a municipality for an infrastructure project described in this Act and for which project the revenue bonds were issued. (3)A loan made with money derived from the sale of revenue bonds under this section shall be made as other loans under sections 4 to 12 of this Act are made, except that the loan contract shall set forth a schedule of payments which shall not exceed the usable life of the contracted infrastructure project. SECTION 21. (1) Revenue bonds issued under sections 17 to 21 of this Act: (a)Shall not be payable from nor charged upon any funds other than the revenue pledged to the payment thereof, except as provided in this section, nor shall the state be subject to any liability thereon. No holder or holders of such bonds shall ever have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the state to pay any such bonds or the interest thereon,nor to enforce payment thereof against any property of the state except those moneys paid to the Special Public Works Debt Service Account, including interest on such moneys, under the provisions of sections 17 to 21 of this Act. (b) Shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the state, except those moneys paid to the Special Public Works Debt Service Account,including interest on such moneys, under the provisions of sections 17 to 21 of this Act and those moneys in the Special Public Works Security Reserve Account,under the provisions of this Act. (c)Shall not exceed, for all bonds outstanding,a total value of$100 million. (2) Each bond issued under sections 17 to 21 of this Act shall recite in substance that the bond, including interest thereon,is payable from the revenue pledged to the payment thereof and,under the conditions specified in paragraph (d) of subsection (2) of section 4 of this Act, from the Special Public Works Security Reserve Account.No such bond shall constitute a debt of the state or a lending of the credit of the state within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation. SECTION 22. Any economic development program financed with proceeds from the state lottery authorized by section 4,Article XV of the Oregon Constitution shall have displayed conspicuously on the site or as part of the program information specifying that the program is being financed by the state lottery. SECTION 23. (1) In addition to and not in lieu of any other limitation, the amount in subsection (1) of section 8, chapter Oregon Laws 1985 (Enrolled Nouse Bill 5032), shall be the other fund limitation from the Special Public Works Fund for distribution to municipalities through a periodic competitive evaluation process. (2) Not less than 33 percent of these funds shall be used to provide financial assistance to nonurban infrastructure projects and not less than 33 percent shall be used to provide financial assistance to urban infrastructure projects. SECTION 24. In addition to and not in lieu of any other limitation, the amount in section 4, chapter Oregon Laws 1985 (Enrolled House Bill 5032), shall be the other fund limitation from the Special Public Works Fund for distribution, in the form of grants, to municipalities for specific projects as described in paragraph(b)of subsection(4)of section 4 of this Act. SECTION 25. Notwithstanding the limitation on administrative expenses found in paragraph (a) of subsection (I) of section I I of this Act and paragraph (a) of subsection (1) of section 13 of this Act, $25,000 is established as the maximum from the amount allocated by subsection(1)of section 8,chapter Oregon Laws 1985(Enrolled House Bill 5032), which may be expended for the biennium beginning July 1, 1985. SECTION 26. The limitation imposed by chapter 127, Oregon Laws 1985(Enrolled House Bill 5038), on the Public Transit Division is increased by $5 million to provide grants to mass transit systems in this state for Enrolled House Bill 2938 Page 7 the purpose of matching federal appropriations for capital projects that promote economic growth and development. SECI-ION 27. (t)The limitation imposed by chapter 83,Oregon Laws 1985(Enrolled Senate Bill 5548),on the Executive Department is increased by $1 million to provide financial support to county fairs in Oregon counties with a population under 400,000 and to support those special events identified in ORS 462.280(1)(e)(A) to(H). (2) The Intergovernmental Relations Division shall select, through an annual competitive process, the counties and special projects to receive financial assistance from the funds described in this section. SECTION 28. The limitation imposed by chapter 83,Oregon Laws 1985(Enrolled Senate Bill 5548),on the Executive Department is increased by $250,000 for distribution to the Oregon Downtown Development Association to provide technical assistance to communities in the planning and design of downtown develop- ment projects. SECTION 29. The limitation imposed by chapter 63,Oregon Laws 1985(Enrolled Senate Bill 5538),on the State Forestry Department is increased by $1,300,000 for the purpose of establishing a precommercial forest thinning project. SECTION 30. This Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety,an emergency is declared to exist,and this Act takes effect July I, 1985. Passed by House June 20,1985 Received by Governor: .....................I M.,..... ...... .......... 1985 ............ . . . . . ....... .............. Approved: Chief Clerk of House ........... ..........M......................... 1985 ........................................... Speaker of House ........................................... Governor Filed in Office of Secretary of State: Passed by Senate June 20,1985 ......I........I M.,..... ............... . 1985 ... .. ............ .... . ..... ........... President of Senate . . . . ....• •...•.. Secretary of State Enrolled House Bill 2938 Page 8 WORKING PAPER N° 5EVEN • TAB LES 25 Q � 21510 PROJEC 1 PUBLIC I A&PQUVEMENTS •••TNI:l1Z COSTS (19e)-3t ) AW) FU l`1 D 11•IG S00 2C ES 0 `T-A BLf-5 2<o, 27, 2-8, 29 WM4 A MAX l MUM TAX 1NC2EMV_KT_ F_X PF1-4V 1TUV-E OF $ S,Co$0,000 ., AWNUAL SUMS SPENT (AVAILABLE-) , VOU GR.OWTN E5TtMATES `'A k BN @ FOUV- 1D1r-r-Eu_r-_1AT TAX SZATES GROWTH TAX YR. S.G8M AMOUNT REQUIReO To COMPMTS LI=ST RATE SPEMT WORK to Gurre,n+ dollar-s '* 1=lsca l Year A. 23.005 1997 - 98 1,750,740 in 1997 Dollars A. 20.0019913 - 99 V2, 154,550 in N98 Dc-liar'sN A. 13.01 2002 - 03 $4, J4-1,900 in 2002 Dallarg J r A 11.00 2003- 04 44,6,Co 1,28 O in 2003 Dollars � 8 23.!05 1994 - 95 43, 1 5 O in 1994 Dollar3 w B 20.00 19195 - 9(0 287, 340 in 1995 Dollars LU 5 13 .01 1991 - 98 1, 1 12, -5-10 in 1997 Doltary � B 11.001 1998 - 99 $ 1,5 IbG., 1 4 0 ir+ 1 g 9 8 Do1la r s ?� Wo-1-e -�kct+ $ 3,006,$50 198°5 Tax Dollars will 6e regvtrecl +a Imp li m en4 all Pro jec-4- Irnpvovew oL4+S (Ta61e 2s ) . S-l-ar4-snq work in 1984 -85 and in-plax-1-in rew►aivtims work @ '7% a +r►�11y , NONE Or- EIGHT CABOVI~) GROa1-i f IM OM1- SC&MAV-105 WILL PRODUCE 50FFICl1:NT TI. PROCFSDS TO C6MPL1✓Tr-_ THE WOR-4 LYLE A. ST-WART TU, Q,Ao5BEFORE Rt:ACRNG TRE MAXIMUM $ 5, 4090,000 TALC UC-P-P-MEWT UM ALLOWED 6.26.83 TABLE 2 5 PUDLIC IMPROVEMENTS PROP0580, TIGAR0 UPBAN COSH' a aT' I MATE 'S► th 1985 ®OLLAR RENEWALAREA FUNDING 0UQCSS AOR d5UCH 1 P , V 11T5 T--0 r)11-4G sou R.Gr=S A WrIC t PATE D PUBLIC t MP ROV M EN TS TOTAL TAX INCTLEMEN T OT"EER- SOU QGES COST PRO AS til OT ED x(1483 °% $ X1983 °% (1983 SouQc� t 6u{z�rH,a.,vN 5�. QFco•uSTrw�T�ot;t 2�}-o ODU �{-o gCfl,000 4o gCo,000 LI D 15 Dc o• Z� �• r �� S i 2,�a c� S D -t-- ?-C)o t--ZUU Cr71 Zoo Li D 15- 152UO S D C 5 S A-av AS++ ST. �Sco ,hs t� Co�w�pv<<o �UtvST2l�CTlc�� l2v n00 9O �� Udo 4O v00 1-iD c i S l 8,c) 0o s o G i01=�{NS JT Qpr+tor�l ��CUL�1STlLuCTlOt�1 �U�OVO t{O �JCo�OdO �O '�� OHO �- O lens t 5 l 3 S0 v 5 c C. j u y 5 4 500 `moo F S TiGiA�ip Jr �Pac.N , 4o GrunkA�e tZt Cc�u5T2ucTturt OO�} �C� 12U,d00 ZC� 4U, bU t_tp i j5d 1v, odJ soF • Cor�r,t=rz�� . (rr,c� ,� 5-�-. r� �i5 tc, 5-r •` 1Zcc��.•T`¢.vc-r-;or.� 'L�E- o 0 0 so (-6 4 4.0 O so '}-4; �'3�O ]—I�� ;� . l S 33 &,00 sic. J/ .5" f 4 2v0 Sll� 3Uc�,000 20 �DO,�rJ 80 2tti-�,ac�0 STATE. `�- A5N S-t'. C�� c�rc�c�l �n F1�11 5� New S t r D12 ��1Ac,E 12, 5o0 50 25Ca 2�JC? 50 � '•�'� L �•y �� jZtC,N-f' of �..ut��( { ao aoa SU ��,OoO 5o rr1 r� u.Q. G a V SS�+J G SO ,U UQU J O i o, , r� 1 O a,00 o SO G,O,UCjC� SO •� � / G2-L�1G Cbz-o Sat r.t C, L' LJ �C,E LID- LOCAL 11v1PRO�J�Mt.T `�IST21� C' SDG = Sof�TN�S i,t� ;�;� ;i Gf(hf TABLE b PUDLIC IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSS ® TlGAQD URBAN COST ESTIMATES In 1985 DOLLARS Fl, N DI G 50U12C E S FOR 'SUIC H I Po V E TSRENEWALAREA FUNUI1-4G sUU1LCbs Af,171C 1 PATE D P U G L► C TOTAl- TAX %mcr. EMEN T 07"x2 SOu Qces COST PRO c_ Eo S AS 1-1 OT ED $0<)83 °% Ci983 °lo (1983 5OU2.cE l rL' q S FFI N 5 t' �N sec.4,o E!o l\ u�• -- Newer rtrc��1- �, D RJ�1 GE SU,�` U Sc�. 25,OOJ 50 S,CXaO iLI O Ud OOU 50 `_U pna 50 Ask L't 0 1 Q16R-7 Q47 WA--( 400 , 'd00 SO RL`IUCf�T1= QAt L oAn ThuxS `>d0 c dOO $O tr1 1 7d 2C) i ^ .- + _� RAIL Rlo^lp LO, OFF GOO , 00 0 ZU 80 (� SAr�I 1 P��-Y ��WE2 Cow ,ergot 'S+. Across a-R. 4G lzje,1, c, S� 59r UOC� d IOCJ '�,rl SEW�[L FUuO .� 13CI-/1 c. GEcJTr--2 LAND Butt -t►�1GS 2, UOcJ,DOC) O 10U '�SDF 'ocp �:� PAS lUn[ 2OVLM�IVTS �� 3 dCfp p loo e�tJO��S`i37000 �`C' S 1 ATE �'s C_ 60 c1 U t_ID l (� /�Al N STc :� t- PEO�sT[LtArt �u��Nlr,>ts t'�E. F�r�2tc�rJG 5 3 0, a o o 80 000 20 oJ 0 L I U aja tri, I ,�99 2 So Lt LD ��' 25Co, 30o snc. i LYL I O U SDS 5�j -7 o a oo s ra E TOTALS 2 00o cid U.c. C3o>vo I 30 d smA.SEwtr . 1=uuo 8,9 13 Sock 4v_Il �o� 850 59.8 38Co; 1 So -rG-rN(- -ct\,icz' TABLE i.� EXPENDITumes 4i, ANVAUAL PROJECT 1MPROVrIMStATS 5ASED on TAX wcP.6tAF-NT INCOME RESULTIMG FROM FOUM TI RD UPBAN 'DIj:FSjLSt4"r TAX RAT9 S k CxIZOWTW ESTIMA"Mr. %%A " PENEW-AL) AREA USING CUTzrze��•Ir MF-: -rgODS a TAxtt-1G U51I1G R-1;DUGt� TAXING MET4{4D @ TAY RATE o� 2'5.65 @ TAX RATE 04- 410-00 @ TASC RATS c-� [3. 01 @ TAX V-ATr T.I.REVENUe T.1.izr=v61UE T.I•REY}iNUE .t.tZEYEUU£ T.(.Q>:.YEf1UE T.t.R6VEt1VE •t.awr.NL7E T.I.SZEVEttUls. T.1.P-SVEUUE .I.UF-VERUE T.I rizwQs4uL T.1.ULVEROF- AWAILABLE 5PU"T BALANCE VAILAIBLF- SPENT BALAuCe AVAILA6lE SPEs,tr 13ALA14CE AvA%�A[3L-E 5 :mvAT SALAuCt; �15CAL 1OR YF-At2- DUQJNC YR. 0 YR.tu0 FO(L YEAR 00[1.014 Ya. @ Yf2. END FOM YSAR DU�*14 `�'¢• CA YR• B�� foR YEASL �Ut21NG YR• @ YR. F�10 �(13AtZ i. I�}8( - $2 NONE N01.1E N-Ot`l� hlO1�E CIUcaE, t�UtyE l`IOhLL� LVat�.E (`101E NC.�e�� NC�KF_ NU�1l. 1483 -84 �K 3fF 1984 •8S 1 400 17,5A0 4,8(0o 'l-7 406 23 290 a,Ild 17 820 15,150 -1-,6,70 15,070 12,810 12-,-2-Go l98S - 86 (P8, 590 5J Soo Io, 190 49,31 U 4-1 ,910 7,40o 37,730 32,070 5 (P( o 31,900 27 I I O 4- 790 1986- 87 t 1 (0,000 g8,(.0o 1-7,400 96, '790 82,21a (4, 5 _0[ 0 13,810 54,240 9, 570 53,9(00 45,870 8,0`10 1987 - 88 1 Sl, 3oc� 159 Zoo 28, 10o 1 58,200 -64,470 '23,-T-30 90,9 8o 771330 131(q5o 8i,1 I d 7,1-'O40 13,0?0 1988- 89 2G3,8ov 2'14,230 39, 570 223,050 18 C?1159 0 Y5 4G0 143,310 12.1, 810 i 1500 111,700 l 04,190 1 1 X3,410 1984 - 90 342,r9U 292 (09cD 56, 0 'L89,So0 24G,33o 43 470 188,250 I(�,oio 28 24fl 159 '}QO i3S,49ca 23,Gi0 o 203,350 3 (940-91 3�8, 510 318, 510 5o,oao 3CoT,g20 3 17, 8Zc� 5v, o0 239,230 i 5,880 '10-1,300 17 1 ,950 X0,350 log l -42 444/-710 349, 710 �o,oac� 450, i� 0 400 i GO 50,000 29(0 180 251 750 44 430 250,x}40 212,87a 3�, 570 1942-93 roo5,89� 555,8`10 50,000 5-20 loo 410, tad 5d,0a 0 350,'230 300, 230 5o,dd0 246 t2rJ -51,1od 44 Za 1943-44 GAS 510 Co 1.5, 15 5o,oao 510, 520 5LO152O 56,(3 a 4a3, 6o00 3831640 1 -qo,do0 33(o,2ec, TRS 280 50,CCY 1994- 95 717, 9yo 04,7, 8`1Q �,000 GI4/8tU S(o4,alo 50,Ood 4I7,41� 3��,4ta So,00d 36vCfl5o 3to,��p 50�Qao IQ95-46 78 330 -7371,2.6o �c>,000 X74,270 Cc24-, 2-7o so,000 45�,a�ia 46G,o90 5(3,°`40 3193 v 313 0 � aQd 1996-97 85383c� 03,r� � y�o0d 7TI770 Co7�1,770 SO,Oa� +9Z 1 a �2, 190 42.3870 73870 So,oao 1497-98 760g0o 769,Ctod 5S 7�-.0 705,760 50,®oc1 509, 100 4S9,t66 53,ado -438, 130 3g 170 So,03� 1918-11 X78,930 G,�8,y3o 0 SQ5 7S0 _4-75,7 0 So,00a 45•LZ50 4oZ,2yJ So,cx7d 1994- oo 5(p5,000 515,oc.0 sa,octa `{85,4 14 X35 4 io So,co0 11 00- 0 1 6 17, 180 5-71 180 50,000 529,550 O SO,add 'Loot - 02 X83,44.0 G33,rt4o 5caaod 5£3Co000 0,000 213,844 213,840 0 (050,540 ,-o0 �4 J &65,460 COL,i . INCLUDES ANtJUAI_ ESTtMATEp T. t. itiICC7ME (To.6lc l9 PLUS DALAvIcs Fitf�m PrZEvious �• • - CO L.2. PO'Q.Tt01-4 a-� T44 6 %alc>G, 850 (T-bls 25 n,0-- INFLATEO @ -I% PFs12 lffL . $tzE-kjT DURtt,(4 `fEACL (To�n� exPar+d►-t-c�re s►�all nod 2scca� �5,68U,C�00> CUL. • BALAUCE oP NCOME @ `(EARL'S END, AVAILABLE TO 13E ADDEO TO FoLLOWtNGYt2.••- 15% a•F Income , no•I• 4-o eucQed 50,000 -G.- astj 4em,- TAX USEtJ To uEr; S+iORT-T�tzN. C�UT't AMNUAI- TAX INCQEMENT FUNDING FOR M01JEC-T TApLE 27 IMf'R.OVEMENTS --- GR.C)WTM ESTIMATE •• A •' ,, , . TWO TIGARD URBAN TAX 'RATES EACH C TWO TA'C I N Gl MST H O DS RENEWAL AREA USING CUR1Z-Sf lT M5--r1AODS o� TAXING USIt1G DUcE-z7 TAXING METW4D @ TAY RAT E. o-V t qn TAX RATS. Of' `� 20.00 @ TAV P-ATl✓ o-� 4 13. 0 l @ TAX V-ATl= a� � ! 1 .00 AVII40AL. CUMULATIVE WUA1.. CUMULATIVE VALM,. WMiC. ANMVAL CUMULATl�IE VALUE o�W21c A1440AL. CVMULATIVe VAWC 414 WRX- �XPElJD1T- �)(Mi=T- PF-14D IT- fiXPE-tDl-r- +0 64 Coml'�TD UPENOIT-- E_<pel.1DIT- {0 6Q COMPLM SY.MtADIT- SXPe"DIT- +. 4c COMP�T0 >I=15GAL V2E5 MES Li U",g 1n cvwewk 6 UQES V1zCS in cwrs..+ to URALS ug-e5 �n currenk 2,. � . `� 2, 3• 1. 1 �. 3• YtLan �.. � z. � - 1481 82 tJOKE rlotic>~ NONp 1So4� NaNF - h10N1:, N- 03 t1oKE PLOtiI� NONE NODE - NOt1F NONE. 1LOtIE NONTc 1983 -84 1d0ttE C�Orc>� 3,6,0C.,850 NUKE NONE 3,1��,850 NONE NONE, 'b,(,0,2"850 NVtit� hloNTc. 3,ld�Cc850 1984 -85 1-7, 5+3 27,540 3 8'� I 790 23 290 �3,2go 3,g3lo,ogc� 15 1 50 15,15t> 3,844 180 12.810 12,8►0 5,84fn,52o 1985 - 86 Sg 3ao 85 84 0 4 041 l0 41 910 �5 200 �,OGz (0 60 32,07o 4-7,1-Ln 4,081 200 Ul 110 3,,42,0 4-,088,6,)0 199(0 87 S �o0 184,44-c 4"L1la o3d 82,270 (4? 470 4,Z6�-, 70 54,244 101,460 4,312 (fls� 45 870 85.1 0 4,329,010 1987 - 83 IS4,2oo 343, ��0 4,3Co2,�so 134,4-70 231, 40 4,�?28 831 7�,33o il8 "1�0 $.53��210 ?4,0 15Q.830 4,558,000 1988- 8.9 220 230 5�7,X70 4,443 Bon 184 590 till 5 30 4, 5'4-4 2�0 111"810 3o,� 4,-1 3,0od 104,290 264,I Zo a,1�2,�70 11981 - 10 2q z. -10 8Ga,5�0 4,4 2 18d 24( 3 7 1-7,8 Go 4,CD2� 380 160,010 _ 4GP,G10 X4,`10 4,300 135,00 399,iolo 4,�f71, 370 1990-9 1 318 Sro ! 1,17 070 4-4 5� oLo 3 i7,220 1, 035,x ? (427 050 203,350 (0603,11(.a 5, 444,254 171.950 5-1 1,5c.a 5, 147,42o 1441 -92 3 710 t_ I,5 L8 780 4418 230 SCO !�O t 4�5 X40 4 U 7�+ ^51,750 41 S, 7 10 , 14 ,pct 2,870 7g$ 4�0 5,2�t't,870 Ig92-43 555 890 ! O 4 G7o i ^, f71 , Cfl20 470, lop I, �}US,940 �r,399, -� 300,230 1,215, 94-0 Sr2c)5r560 251,700 1r03Ca. t3Ca 5,41'x,810 1943-9�F SIS l0 2,700, 184 3.8 120 520 520 }2la 4(.0 4, igcc,G7o 383, 00 1,544,5402,410 5,So�,4�10 1994- 95 6Ca7,8g0 3,3�8,o7a '�,�449 1770 1,270 3 cf14• 36.7, 410 t,9C�,950 5, i 3 i,Tl.?n 310,650 1,&bb,0(00735200 4 10� 2?0 /L 4S2 G2.,+/170 � C�15, 4•Ca 3, 564 700 , 2,373,04038 ��30 343,3501996-97 803,8 0 4 �l0 160 2,355, �7q 170 4 294 3 i0 3, 134 y _44Z, r90 2,8r 5, , It50 3?3.8?0 7 OS 7 C? 5 �O 1,U7C 2 (sG lits 459, 100 3 7.7$,230 4',`150 `1�O 3 i70 2,138,410 5,65/0,020 1998. 9 col& 30 5, b9o,dad �1 t 'jCa 47�, 7 SO 3 ,71W,` 80 4632_•1; 790 4o2,25o 3, 140,740 5 10491 (coo o 51s, Or.0 4 U 5,,040 +1&4.4-41 2(.03,5�� 1�}(c, 5,�o� iso 5Cc7, Igd2,180 X79550 4055,7`kU 5,it lu >,� �lu ° -33, '140 5 qr� Id4 «7�,3gp 536oao a- 5G1,7�+0 5,373400 �Lbo1- o3 0' � � P 5 (a�'so,ocn 4,1�7,`1c`o (.00,540 5 19 ,2A,)210V SUM NUDED 4.Ac52-O3 TO campuLT@ 1M 2002 SUM NE£06D DOLLAMS vo COMPLETe 114 2005 1DOLLAR$ TABLE �a EXPENDITURES► to ANuUAL PROJECT IMPROVP.MSt4T UPBAN 5ASED on TAX UACIMMIENT INCOME IZESUL.TIMG FRWM FU tZ TIGARID DIFFSPLENT TAX IZATE , GIZOWT14 ESTIMATE � � " AL AREA USING CUTZTZSlT ME--r-AODS of TAXING USIt1G VX--DUC�.O TAXING MF-1140 (45%u�d��k�o•�) @ TAX RA.1 it o-� t Lt.65 6P TAX RATE 4' 6 20.00 @ TAX P-A-rie o-!P 4 13. 01 @ TAX V-ATr= 11 .00 T•I.Uevsmue T.t.izEvEyUE T.t.tLL=vERuF- T.t.aevEuuE T.t.R6YEuUE T %svimuE T.I.zsvuiAuE T•t.vzvumuE T1.Rxwes4t1'E. T. EiZE T•I.R.4v1EWUE. Ta-law-vexuc AVA1LAt31.1: SPEa(T t3ALANGE AVAttABLE S PEVAT LANCE AVAILAISLE SP"-r BAtA"CE AVAILABt-E SP82•tT BALA*4 M FISCAL F'ORYMAR DURII�I4 •YLZ• @ YR• _U Ott. `?eAiL DU%MN4 `CQ• YIL•EMD POLL_YE^%L DUS1lWG Y¢• @ %M. VU-0 P02 YEAR DARING YE• @ Y%L-F-140 YEArt 1. 2. 15. 3• 19sl - 82 1JUNE f-4 F NUKE NON E Nol- n NUKE ROtAE NOrI� NCxvE t�ot�b KOusr 1982 - 83 -41 + 1483 -84. 'tF + 1984 -8S 32, 4oa 27, 540 4,860 27 400 23 290 4,110 17,620 '15, 1 50 2,6o70 f5'0-70 1985 - 86 199, 846 76,360 13,480 75 480 1 ,404 49.42o 42 Oto 7,<I-t0 41 ,-760 35,520 270 192(0- S7 184, 710 157, 070 127,7-20 I S� L-70 (32,830 23,x!40 10 t,G50 8(0,400 1 5"2-50 85,9 5-C) 73,060 12,$90 1987 - 83 31115-50 265, Co70 4-(D,,8 80 2(04 310 ,(0 0 3q, co 50 171,440 11-(0,1 50 25,-790 ( 45,370 1 23,5(,0 21,8 1 O 1988- 89 452,cO50 402 650 50,00d 332,790 5o,000 !2q-9,000 Z t I,(050 3.7,350 2 10,540 t -78,960 3 1,580 1989 - 9a 5 84 610 534 010 50,000 502, 100 452 I0o 50,(000 331,440 281 ,720 49,720 280,24-0 238,2o0 42,040 14�D-9 1 742,42c, G92,420 d Co35 SCDO 585, 56Q So;00 0 430,y 0 38o,�ioo 50,000 3 G4-,IOU 314, Ica 50,000 1441 -92 924,210 674-,ZtO r'Ooaa 7S9,24o 739,290 S6,000 Sad, 910 443o,-i10 0, X20 4 SC�,6olo 4U�,�Ia 50,adO 1992-93 lro9( -I-Lo 1 041,220 4,, �7-� Q30,530 gR0 530 SO,00 o (oZZ 18n 47x,7;0 5o t 30 53a,2�c� 484,290 �, oa v I4Q3-4� i 224, 4ao i, 174,,}0O I rU43, 150 493,t 50 501000 546,23 -- 19174- 15* 1994- 95 433 aSo 433, 50 0 (, 1 50,730 !• ►U [,730 So,QaJ o'(10 655,95"0 (005,950 So,OoO 1995-46 149,4-90 149,490 0 x62,22.43 acZ,z2o O^a -73G,-� 04 �a�,-740 5 ,000 1996-97 9Sct 2r30 god 230 SO,oOo 818 iso 768, 50 5o,oa� 1447-98 37e, If-o '37g,1�0 0 8?2,474 822 47a �rJ,UoQ 1998- 9 38z,75o 382,754 0 1 q 49- OO -Loa I• OL COL..1 . tNCLUOES ANWUAL ESTIAAkT E-O T. I. WCME (To61c Z O PLUS BALA14ca FiZ," Przs\IIOUS COL.2. PO2TI014 a-E 7'411r 6 'kGOG, 8507 (T-J619 25 INFLATEO 0 Z% PER 1x62 .•• 'SPE 4T DURIt.14 `fEA2. (To+nl expand%4-Uee shall ool e3ec=0 i�5,680,000) COL.3 - BALAUGE of It-4COME 0 YEAR.tS END, AVAILABLE TO BE ADDED -M FO"WW4 `IiEAR.••• t59'6 o� Income , na ko Q1ccQ2cl 4� 50,000 �e� ca„►� yets.r- _ L_TAx INCR.. PROCEEDS USED TO IZF-rt2 SHORT-T> RM t�Tir TABLE 2cj ANNUAL TAX INCREMENT FUNDING FOR. PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS - GROWTH LSTIMATE o 6""•• - • TWO -'1"bGA12 () URBAN TAX TLATES eACH C TWO TAXING METHODS RENEWAL AREA USING CUTRt2.'_t t-T~ ME.T't;\ODS USING 2-SDUC>..A TAXING METWO'D (4.5%12*d,3r_k,00) @ TAX RAT E. o.� t V .65 0 TAX RATE of 6!10.00 @ TAX P-ATs 13. 01 @ TAX RAT r= a P 46 t 1 .00 ___ANV4UAL GUMULATNE VALUE of WRC ANNUAL. cummATIVE VAwv*TWRK. ANNUAL CUMULA-mir. VALUE a;wax AmmUAL. GUMULATNE VALUEof WRIc. ExpowlDI.-- EXPB6401-m- Talb9 CbMPL'TD EXPE11D1 EXPfiMDt=- T015MIAWTD EXPEMCIL - EXP£MD1- TO SEE COMPL'TD SUPS"01 gxPEUDr-- TO YE COMPLITO TUQES TURES in curren+ 4t ru%LSS TURES Incurren+ 4b TUtz.ES TU[L65 in cvrran+ TU"S TU"15 inCurrM} 1481 - 82 19 82 -83 1983 -84- -1-984-SS 841984-85 27,540 _12_"7 5+0 �5 (�0c-,850 231290 T '-l4o O(fl X350 l5, 1 50 IS,1 So 3,C,Urx,,85o 12,810 12,8(O 3 c"o& 85o 1485 ~ 86 7�,3�a 103,900 3,7 82,970 64,58o 87,8,70 3,79 750 A 2,U10 57 16o 3,8 17,320 35,520 48,330 3,823,810 1986' 87 157,0?O 2�U,970 3,890,110 (32,F�3C� 220700 3,421, 550 8G 400 143,5 0 3,998, 130 73,0(00 12.),390 +,016,410 1987 - 83 11(05,(010 52co,(a+0 3,897, 3-10 �? �;c�o 4453Go 3,�i77,�20 14C� 150 2J9,710 4,131 ,850 113,50 /L44,950 A-, 17G,15c� 1488 89 401-,&50 919,290 3,7Co7, 5(oo a�,2,790 778,15 0 3,n 3,480 Zt 1 (.So 501,3 0 4,209,430 t78,eiGa 4'1-3,910 q-,289,52.0 1984 - 9d 53�- to (,4-43.,90o 3,4.96,&80 452,100 1,130,250 't &0,n2C? 281 �7A 783,080 4 ,222,370 238,Loo G(o2, t�0 4,351,58c3 14�p-91 6,91A-Lo 2 1;,�,32U 3,049,010 585 5(o 1, 815,810 3,4-= ?,r30 380,9oo 1 IG_3,980 4, 137 040 314,1Oo 97G,21U 4,342,090 i4�t -92 8-)4 -(0 3,030,S30 n,38a, ?4o 739 2=?0 2 555 160 �, �''v�.`? J "Ho Glo 1,(,44,840 3 '14-s 710 4oG,(,Dlo i, b8Z 810 4,239,430 Ig92-93 1.0411ZL� 4, 071,)50 1 , 5I�}, 1c�o 87 :;320 314 35,E O =,:-47,JA0 512,780 X1,217,(o70 3,64-9, 110 ¢84,2..Rc� l,t3C,?, 110 4,051,900 1943-14 t. 174,400 E IL4(a 150 445,794 ,' ro 4,428 7�3Q 1) 41 100 0 0"'040 1,8(3,7 10 3,258,540 541n Zoo I1.,4t 3 340 3,-7F39,'�vn 1994- 95 43 '� X350 5,(080 doa 4'�, 1 So 4, ! U 1,73© 5 5 ;0,51 J 408,250 71to,C8o 3,580,3`10 2,7�y,g6o (�'o5,�r�C 3,v 19 290 3,448 C.cc) 0,740 3,100,030 3,003 2(00 1996-97 us 909,230 5,301, 34-0 I , 393,010 7� ,7 4,474,780 2,4-44;74o 1497- 98 = y 378,100 5,&80,000 1, 112,370 12,47o 5,lgg ,150 I ,79�,400 1918- 11 V, •- N ~ �,� 382750 S,loBo,000 1, 53 , 190 1899- ooO- o�v 1fJ00~OI O�ozP�~D � �?a��••a+a to r h 3 2001- OZ .IQQU�tnDd ,�,yy �9v111-H0 O� QJt� v' YQ 1nUa LA W PELd J J / � i r j 0-f O \ � I \ I I O A E 9 F �r STREET O' MARA 1K 5As iZEN E�A%L U N D#s Z� MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD TO: Tigard Downtown Business and Property Owners FROM: William A. Monahan, Director of Community Development iL i � SUBJECT: Central Business District Meeting -- September 24, 1985 DATE: August 27, 1.985 In June the Tigard Economic Development Committee conducted a survey to determine what the property owners and business operators in the central business district perceive to be problems , Based on the survey, it appears that the greatest problem is the overall appearance of the area and the lack of a major commercial draw. The Committee, the City, and the Chamber of Commerce would like to help you to examine the problems, develop a plan of action, and make improvements to the area. To be successful, we must join together to develop a realistic action program. A meeting will be held on Tuesday, September 24, 1985, at the Tigard Community Center on Commercial Street from 5:00 p.m, to 7:30 p.m. . You or a representative are invited to attend to hear a presentation on the results of the survey. We hope to then have an open discussion on what steps the Business Community, Chamber, Committee, and City can take to improve the business climate in the downtown area, Some suggestions already mentioned are: improve parking facilities, make some traffic improvements, create a downtown business association, start up special promotions, and develop a plan for the area, The Committee and the City will continue to key on the downtown if the downtown community shows support and interest. If there is an overriding attitude that no City action is needed and that the area should be allowed to develop on its own, the City and the Committees will honor those wishes. Please attend the meeting an September 2.4, 1985 and voice your opinion. (WAM:cz/1733P) CENTRAL_ BUSINESS DISTRICT SURVEY ANALYSIS 1 , What do you feel. are the existing problems which prevent the central business district from developing into a stronger center? 12. Traffic 12 Parking 3 Zoning 5 Existing business mix 1.5 Appearance of the area 3 Public Facilities 1 Other Appearance of the area was cited as the major problem. One respondent stated that public property was the problem. Traffic and parking were also cited as mayor problems. Among the comments provided by the respondents, several related to zoning and business mix. There was no clear concensus, however, as some felt that industry should be phased out, consistent with the comprehensive plan, while others favored allowing new industrial uses. Appearance of the area was rated as needing improvement. Traffic and parking were rated as inadequate for the needs of the area. Improvements were suggested, 2. Do you think the following would be positive steps toward improving the area? The appearance of downtown buildings was cited as the major problem. 78% felt that property owners should be encouraged or required to better maintain the appearances of their property . Other positive steps identified were creation of a shopping center at the south end of Main Street, creation of off—street parking lots, and creation of a downtown merchant' s and property owners promotional organization, Their comments imply a desire on the part of the property owners and businesses to take positive steps to stimulate the level of business activity in the area. 3 . What direction should the Committee pursue to help the area change for the better? Mixed input was given concerning whether the Committee should be involved or if the area should be allowed to develop on its own. The majority of respondents did, however, suggest that the Committee, Chamber, or City should work to improve the area and establish a plan. Comments about appearance were again voiced , 4 . What can the private sector, the existing property owners, and business in the area, do to improve the downtown? Appearance of the area dominated these responses also. Improvement of existing buildings and efforts to make a cleaner, neater appearance were cited. Present property owners were encouraged to get together and plan for a better downtown, spend money for improvements, or sell to someone who will upgrade the property . 5. What are the greatest positive factors which would attract new business to the area? Improved appearances, parking, bringing responsible development to the area, and improved government involvement were suggested. Improvements suggested throughout the survey were reiterated. Better governmental input was mentioned in terms of a need for leadership, specifically in dealing with potential developers. 8 . Any other comments? Some positive comments were expressed, again about appearance and attitude. Suggestions for creation of an architectural review committee, improvement to a postal drop condition, and park improvements which would stimulate pedestrian traffic were mentioned. (WAM:bs/1733P) careol"',10ki I�roli . s—:w * .se r< ,.+. k. He' will discuss thg matter dries and �'comm groups'for re opt Sir Cie " thd"w ►o r `y4-me"g � over tW*A- with;his board Wednesday and: . a,i±Totr7tn ballot measare to..ra�se � },D�piq]s;.seid tbat,it• gatthercd,the p 4 ovine s`of about 98 pel• ` bon's receipti,rl watch and his own r44 in writing,county Comm r,, -a zoic:pi�tj est an , =:# sport►.: h Ts,'•V4!ot�lil ; d M. , ' igotteyf att�t�tb robbers left on ti epnontbiu..the. i�dbid - ►llf,. droppinq.d Pinl �� "� po1GCe" dNd� capons`,a, e.: stoner• Dave Sturdevant said;, "" � s M .:;5 , -µmw .�,y`,, �Q�}� y� �M � �' � OtW► a meeting �'Y{M-i k �.N,`, •d A e'� „+ r •i, "w xr�. •ri-1, „�;�•[ � ( �er` I•�W P 'i+ A Tuesday $ 44� prOr :Hnsaid the it; f_•v `"r +ar.�=s e7#i�__ e�, �I ail f �lB Sd� �"I �1` � .: `^+[ t A zbtpt �m9$iotlet{K d e ttQ while desai ons all, in the tq►o' � t..:. �� `� ,1� y �� .w•. m•,y��a s. ,S ,.,. ,�3. rr,'�"��811� �f �� 111�,1�'9VAr r L d' "t Chief faces check '" + : seen. RIG — Atter se Z ..;� chief-of the. Boring R U*7% � k Department for 17 Y ears, MatE* Shields'performance will be ev "14-1 e luated for the first time later tbhfa enure QP eekevy .a . s row e'to ' �► ' mont>,. vale`. a County s, tal.tR ,, I � ,be este „< Richard harles`YC�u fire district's:board has "$ aaasportatlan tY' «.t$� t The ._ . - z r ;, qung ,.,/ �.q�� work�sessIon: 'a ., ' : ,:- n� §�-�,�, ,,b :,�, :, .•� � : ,,r,( B ,rharXhryi"Y .� scheduled ,.f4,2P; for 7:30 ursda ;ate, , :: :. ti, 1�r r Grave81d8 4CLWCeB or�ChBId Charles m° 01 ' re� hall meeting ao0�� Young and BarYatT GhrXl'Young will be at 1 eves , • O R ' . ; 2 p m.Wcdn�idltd Skyline Memorial Gari bE, Work on Shields' ua � dens in Portland; tion. uEa 3 ,x i The `boards evaluation :1C �priakesPoadent~ Mrf y Aug. iZ In Fora Worth. Shlelds will assess '��'� He was 49. his mans - '!' _ K '� 8.ai1 4, ` ►Was�4 rea 0 de I dttt`atftC= Tezas,in an auto iicctdent. n GA Ove;'tlte'>� e11r , e� p fl .-. 1 e tfAt $lII 8, Young sled Aug.14 a Fort Worth mept•;.and operation of the dis- r .,, pl' PP : . trI eaarell as his fiscal tannin" dn pi;downs ard, and<tha r n d fmpa" o holotal from;in es recdved in.the acid P 6x � � $ b i Y a , s= deet,$ and im lementation, leadership, �` ' y i4' n between the board peo,�Aafi[i:Yao hOtnTin=Seattle,Wash,:' #acd.,o s � 1>ute b Iii 6 r X14::#iiird - ip tk I ; . aabcf t>ue district. and his ability to: z �a � 47rd. ��" �.;edu6sW inPortland.�.. the;district's eight '� : +� aibool mat — > to quest! 11d*dvV *or firefighters and 70 volunteers-,, •,� 7�v m i r to 4 k for three' x b` aC McMinnville T}Y di M" .Iie}ywaa t�veteran ;turn to prafiff ,. 5 mm Y&ua=.tp Bora W p�£. edit�rp�e�d �ti�EasC Q1 EGON CrrY—An Oregon; _ " ti:: t;oi Micbt"'She a t ro , f y 10 restaurant owner is lau Stubborn oft run of bad • _ a h. E` and turning it into good '"chard, M. Wiitaneu, ow� w `" C # ppoas 5lttkdde i�oa>s��ort "� _414 ¢ ca `W. and hiek`ihrother►`Pota Y•^ x "o Wheel Cafe,503 Maia.S�' ant •3 ereA,0A sign Monday Outside g,; .�� #�f$A� x.• omYg rwa x t::said:' S r j� are.&dShter� establishment the "W. ham now-sold over.27,000 alxfttt services( er Lottery KKckets' and, dee bad"tt►eit;:' 914"";, ;!Dove ygo,Vf,•1s�,�P�,..,.�_�,, L7,, • sson and : ,4Qttery M '. era �•�p� a co oz,, i ti.9. i". is Y� Tr �.at� ��+�s� �4Vi�i ffi qle have not had awinner fg'� x mA ,alstersSue this is diculoust > Wa^ '. �tjsg$ ` Z£° r1i' +fe' h beV lep»ie m tt tlr Nicht Kay IJpo g �-,. i Charnel of .... iifyLfT ,_ y Byov�is het= war= Flafrav � .6..zt�t� TM.a ,,�51';�> �.^ �,th, t `� � {^ i,.' y �Y ♦ '�`� {Yy�^{ �.� '� - - 'w ^3, 4 a ✓1a"tV., 0 • THE TIMES,Week of September 5-11, 1v85 Page 5A Downtown merchants to discuss ideas How to spruce u T*igard 's town ' ?. TIGARD — Downtown property owneer rs and merchants th will me discuss they should do, if anything, to improve that central business district. The city's Economic Develop- s h- ment Committee is organizing the Thursday, Sept. 26 meeting for downtown business operators and IL property owners, with hopes that those people will take the initiative ;i t { and work together to rejuvenate the Y f area. The meeting will begin at 6 p.m.,in the Tigard Community Cen- x, Ar R ter. City officials have vowed not to take the lead in any downtown im- provement programs, according to Tigard's Community Development x Director Bill Monahan. "I really want to see this thing work," Monahan said. "The down- town area has great potential.If the interest is there from the business " community's standpoint, we'll be more than glad to provide our(city) resources for them to use." 21 ; According to a majority of busi- ness ussness operators and property owners who responded recently to a survey on problems and growth potential k for the downtown district, the area could develop into a stronger busi- ness uss ness center if building appearances, Yom : traffic and parking were improved t HA," b leafy � �aE�3y z' s� .zsA: ....A.:xo. .,..,?r,.< r : .t:......';,� .. r�F�.K�:M'"5.. k'�.K. `iia �y' =z-" •:. x..:��.�.:i�..s,.Y� �,c'�:' .-, The Economic Development Committee drafted the survey and scan Wa►o sent it to 117 downtown property Tigard's Economic Development Committee has surveyed merchants about downtown building and parking problems owners and business operators. Twenty-four people answered and one involved in the downtown area merchants." to stimulate growth there,how they Main Street and other streets in the returned it. to attend the Sept. 26 meeting," Monahan is expecting the down- can work with the city to increase district and how they can work to- Monahan said."We will hand deliv- town business neighbors to talk the availability of parking spaces gether to improve retail trade in "We are strongly urging every- er and personally invite all of the about what the private sector can do and inprove the traffic flow along downtown. v Tigardprepares brochure for Japanese By DEEDEE HARRPiGTON looking for a prime relocation or expansion area. attached, was $300, including word processing and Cwfeepandwk The - Copies of the pamphlet and an English translation two-color printing. TIGARD — A green, white and blue souvenir of the text were presented by William Monahan, Two volunteer translators prepared the Japanese from the city of Tigard will go home with the 108 community development director,to the Tigard City version of the Informational material.Noriko Huruse Japanese participants in the Japan-American Confer- Council on Wednesday night at a special council Roberts of Portland worked for the U.S.Embassy as ence of Mayors and Chamber of Commerce Presi- meeting. a trade-show consultant in Tokyo before moving to dents — a souvenir that city officials hope will "It shows a commitment to expand the city's eco- Oregon and has.done translations for the Portland attract Japanese businesses td Tigard. nomic development potential in many different Development Commission and Nike Inc. The other Tigard was the only community other than Port- areas, Monahan said after the meeting. We think, translator,HItomi Tamura,teaches Japanese at West land—the conference's host city—to prepare infor- too �that it's a show of good will to the Japanese." LinnHIgh School.mations! materials in Japanese for the foreign vlsi- Ti tors to take home and share with businesses interest- Although Tigard has less undeveloped industrial Other advisers who contributed to the bilingual ed in expanding to the United States. land than other Washington Countycities,a number project included Tadakazu Kumashiro,executive vice The 500 copies of Tigard's green, white and blue of industrial facilities are ready to'4ouse new busi- president of Ataka Lumber,and Kuninori Kawakami, pamphlet will be distributed at the conference, to nesses such as high-technology support industries vice president and general manager of NEC America, In-state and out-of-state Oregon Economic Develop— and software firms,Monahan said. Portland, who played a significant role in selecting meat offices and to local real estate and other organi- Excluding staff time, the cost of the pamphlet, H 1sboro as the site for the NEC electronics plant zations that may deal with Japanese business people with a business card of Tigard Mayor John Cook now under construction,city officials said.