02/08/1977 - Minutes MINUTES
TIGARD SITE DEVELOPMENT AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
February 8, 1977 - 5 :30 P.M.
City Hall
12420 S .W. Main Street - Tigard, Oregon
1 . CALL TO ORDER : The meeting was called to order at 5 : 30 P.M.
by Chairman McMonagle .
2. ROLL CALL : Present : Olson , McMonagle , Cook, Hammes, Goldbach
Staff : Edwards and Daniels .
3. MINUTES : Cook moved and Hammes seconded that the minutes of
January 25, 1977 be approved as submitted.
4. COMMUNICATION: None
5 . DESIGN REVIEW :
5 . 1 SDR 1-77
A request by Daniels, Wiggins and Daniels Construction for
site plan and architectural review of a proposed warehouse
and shop at 8950 S .W. Burnham Street . (Wash . Co . Tax Map
2S1 2 AD, Tax Lot 2600) .
A. Site Development Plan
1 . Staff Report : Read by Edwards
2 . Staff Recommendation :
Staff recommends approval with the following condi-
tions :
1 . A detailed landscape plan for the entire site be
submitted (subject to staff approval) .
2 . The southern curb cut be eliminated and put into
landscaping and the northern curb cut be widened
to a maximum of 24 ' without causing removal of the
8 ' caliper birch .
3 . Wheel blocks be added to all parking spaces.
4 . The landscape strip in the west setback area
be widened to 41 .
5 . Fence be sight obscuring with cedar slats .
6. A non-remonstrance agreement be filed with the
City Recorder for the improvement of S .W. Burnham.
Edwards explained difficulties in reviewing this site plan
because of poor building arrangement and lack of landscape
detail .
3 . Applicants Presentation :
MINUTES
TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
February 8, 1977
Page 2
Jerry Daniels explained the site plan
- access via 16 ' driveway
- building location
o Cook questioned the 16 ' driveway .
4 . Commission Discussion and Action :
o J . Daniels explained its status .
o McMonagle questioned parking backout .
o Edwards said that it meets the Tigard Municipal Code .
o Edwards explained that a more favorable approach
would be to amend the conditional use permit and
reorient the building toward either S .W . Burnham
Street or the 16 ' driveway .
o J. Daniels explained current circulation pattern .
o Edwards proposed handling the access for both this
lot and the adjacent lot under ownership of Daniels,
Wiggins and Daniels when it developes .
o Cook proposed relocating the two parking spaces on
the south side of the maple tree so the planter
island can be expanded so as to provide for a better
rooting pattern.
o McMonagle stated that the curb cut problems should
be handled at the time an L. I .D. is formed for the
improvement of S .W. Burnham or at such time as a
development proposal is submitted for the adjacent
parcel under Daniels, Wiggins and Daniels ownership .
o Olson questioned why a minimum 2 ' wide landscape area .
o Edwards responded that it was to be supplemented by
2 ' from adjacent properties and to provide screening.
o McMonagle proposed a 3 ' wide landscape bed.
o Olson moved and Cook seconded to approve the plan
with staff conditions 1 , 3-6 and
7. The planting on southwest corner be widened
to 4 ' parking modification .
8 . The parking arrangement be modified to expand
w the planter bed for the existing maple tree .
The motion was approved by a unanimous voice vote.
MINUTES
TIGARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
February 8, 1977
Page 3
l
B. Architectural Design Review:
1 . Applicant 's Presentation :
J. Daniels proposed a "Mitchell Type" metal building.
o Rain drains will dump directly into storm drain.
2. Commission Discussion and Action :
Hammes moved and Olson seconded to approve the
architectural plans as submitted.
The motion was approved by a unanimous voice vote.
6 . OTHER BUSINESS :
6. 1 Discussion on code requirements .
o Staff explained the current code requirements for parking
lot landscaping.
o Cook proposed staggering larger planter beds rather than
2 ' on each side of a property line.
o McMonagle proposed amending the code to provide flexibility
where the 70 ' on center landscape beds can be aggregated to
provide larger planter beds .
o McMonagle stated a need for a purpose for the landscaping
requirements.
o Cook proposed "an average of 41 " where 2' is now required
and to add "or the equivalent area" to the 70 ' on center
requirement .
7. ADJOURNMENT:
There being no other business the meeting was adjourned at 7 : 00 .