03/09/1976 - Minutes MINUTES
Tigard Site Development Plan & Architectural Design Review Board
March 9, 1976
12460 S. W. Main St.
General Telephone Building
Tigard, Oregon
1. CALL TO ORDER: Chairman McMonagle called the meeting to order
at 5 :45 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL: Present: Cook, McMonagle, Olson, Wakem; staff: Powell
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of January 27, 1976 and February
24, 1976, were approved as read.
4. COMMUNICATIONS: None.
5. DESIGN REVIEWS
5.1 Benol/Safeway Store expansion/Tigard Plaza
A request for design review of a proposed expansion of the
existing Safeway Store in Tigard Plaza at Pacific Highway
and Hall Blvd.
A. Site Development Plan Review
1. Staff Report: read by Powell
2. Applicant Presentation:
o Mssrs. Ted Chilless and Dave Sheridan (Safeway)
presented the amended site plan proposal (in-
cluding the landscaping required by the Planning
Commission) .
o Monte Cook asked about the height of the proposed
"screening vegetation" across the rear.
o Chilless proposed using photinia behind and junipers
in front.
o McMonagle asked about irrigation.
o Mr. Sheridan responded that an irrigation system
would be provided in the rear and there is a hose
Bibb outlet at each corner of the building.
3. Public Testimony: none
4. Staff Recommendation: APPROVAL of proposal submitted,
as amended
page 2
DRB Minutes
March 9, 1976
5. Rebuttal: None.
6. Board Discussion and Action
o Motion to approve proposal as amended (Cook)
o Seconded (Wakem)
o Motion approved unanimously
B. Architectural Design Review
1. Applicant Presentation: Applicant described materials
to be used in site expansion.
2. Board Discussion and Action:
o Motion to approve architectural plans (Cook)
o Seconded (Olson)
o Approved unanimously
5.2 SDR 4-76 (Big "B" Thriftway/Canterbury Square)
A request for review of a proposed addition to the service
facilities at the Big "B*' Thriftway in Canterbury Square.
A. Site Development Plan Review
1. Staff Report: read by Powell.
2. Applicant Presentation: Mr. Britz, applicant,
explained the structure would be a 3 sided
addition to dock area and would help eliminate
an existing litter problem.
3. Public Testimony: None
4. Staff Recommendation:
o Powell suggested some landscaping to break up
the impact of structure.
o Britz explained he leases floor space only and
the owner of Canterbury Square is responsible
for landscaping and maintenance of all common
areas. Britz further stated he would be building
the proposed structure at his own cost.
o Powell then recommended consideration of approval
page 3
DRB Minutes
March 9, 1976
of the structure be considered exclusive of
landscaping.
5. Rebuttal: None
6. Board Discussion and Action
o Motion to approve proposed addition to the
service facilities at the Big "B" Thriftway,
(Olson)
o Seconded (Cook)
o Unanimously approved.
B. Architectural Design Review
1. Applicant Presentation:
o Applicant stated plans to change colors pro-
posed in original plan from gold to a color
matching present structure.
Aiw 2. Board Discussion and Action
o Further discussion with staff, board and applicant
on dissimilar use of materials and methods of
eliminating visual problems while keeping in
mind the structure is temporary.
o Motion (Olson) to approve architectural design
plan with the following conditions:
1. siding be carried down to 61, from grade
with screen to grade and facia board that
would be compatible with existing building
2. Gates that would be sight obscuring.
o Seconded (Cook)
o Unanimously approved
6. OTHER BUSINESS: None.
7. ADJOURNMENT: 6:40 p.m.