Loading...
04/13/1976 - Minutes MINUTES Tigard Site Development Plan & Architectural Design Review Board April 13, 1976 - 5:00 p.m. General Telephone Building 12460 SW Main St. , Tigard, Oregon 1. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by Chairman McMonagle at 5:10 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: McMonagle, Olson, Hammes, Cook; staff: Bolen 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The minutes of the 3/23/76 meeting were approved as submitted. 4. COMMUNICATIONS: None 5. DESIGN REVIEW: 5.1 SDR 7-76 (Jerry's Barber Shop - An appeal of a previous architectural approval by the Board on 3/23/76) A. Architectural Design Review 1. Applicant's Presentation o Charlotte Olson abstained from taking action on this item and presented the design, materials and colors to the Board. o Cook moved to approve the architectural plan and materials and colors as submitted. o Hammes seconded. o Motion passed by majority vote, Olson abstaining. 5.2 SDR 8-76 (Bishop - Main St. Office Building) A proposed commercial building which will stand in the place of two dilapidated wooden structures on the south side of Main St. at the railroad tracks. A. Architectural Design Review 1. Staff Report and Recommendation o Bolen presented the staff findings and a rec- ommendation for denial of the parking area plan. 2. Applicant's Presentation o Tom Whitaker, project architect, presented the IAW site plan and performed a demonstration with page 2 DRB Minutes 4/13/76 scale model cars of how the parking lot would function. He stated that, making 4 maneuvers, a car could turn around in the parking lot and exit in a forward motion. 3. Board Discussion and Action o The members spent considerable time discussing how the parking arrangement could function better. Everyone concurred that the best arrangement would be a drive-through into the Savings and Loan parking lot at the rear. o Cook moved that the site plan be approved with the condition that one parking stall be removed to facilitate maneuvering in the parking lot and that the landscaping for the lot across Main St. be submitted for staff approval. o Seconded by Hammes. o Motion passed by unanimous vote of all members present. B. Architectural Design Review 1. Applicant's Presentation o Whitaker presented the building design. 2. Board Discussion and Action o Hammes moved that the building design be approved as submitted. o Seconded (Olson) . o Motion passed by unanimous vote of all members present. 5.3 SDR 5-76 (Carpenter Apartments) A request by Gordon Carpenter to construct a 32 unit apartment complex on a 2.83 acre parcel on SW 98th St. , south of Greenburg Rd. and directly north of SW Scott Ct. A. Site Development Plan Review 1. Staff Report and Recommendation o Bolen presented the staff report with a re- commendation for denial. Page 3 DRB Minutes 4/13/76 2. Applicant 's Presentation o Mr. Carpenter presented his proposal to build 32 apartment units and stated that he planned to take into account the existing trees on the site as staff had requested. 3. Board Discussion and Action o McMonagle said that his partner had had some business dealings with Mr. Carpenter and he, there- fore, would abstain from taking part in this item. o Cook said that, in that Mr. Carpenter recognizes the staff concern that as many trees as possible be saved on this site and that the plan presented must be redesigned in order to do that, the pro- ject was not to the point of completion where the Board was able to respond to the submission. o Cook moved that the submitted plan be denied. o Olson seconded and the motion passed by unanimous vote of the members present and voting. 5.4 SDR 9-76 (Van Lom-Kraxberger/Englewood Apartments) A request by the Van Lom-Kraxberger Partnership to con- struct 50 apartment units on a 4.96 acre parcel on SW Scholls Ferry Rd. at SW Springwood Dr. in the Englewood Planned Development. A. Site Development Plan Review 1. Staff Report and Recommendation o Bolen presented the staff findings and recommended denial of the submitted plan. 2. Applicant's Presentation o Mr. Van Lom presented the project. He stated that the staff's concern over the two story apartments violating the privacy of the back yards of the adjoining single family dwellings was not an issue because of the setback distance of the apartments from the property line. Re- garding the staff concern for the pool and recreation building and area adjacent the single family homes, he said that this area could be moved further to the north and east and near the apartment structures. page 4 DRB Minutes 4/13/76 3. Board Discussion and Action o Olson asked if the plan could be approved with the submitted preliminary landscape plan. o Bolen said that it could with the condition that staff approve the final submitted land- scape plan. o Cook moved for approval of the submitted plan, with the condition that the pool be kept 40 ft. from the fence adjacent the single family area; that the area between the pool and the single family area be adequately screened; that a 6 ft. fence be provided adjacent the single family homes; and that a 10 ft. easement be provided along the Scholls Ferry right-of-way , to accommo- date the bicycle path. o Hammes seconded the motion and it passed by unanimous vote. B. Architectural Design Review 1. Applicant's Presentation o Mr. Van Lom presented the design of the buildings. o McMonagle asked what the siding material would be. o Mr. Van Lom replied that rough sawn plywood would be used with kerf edging on all sides. 2. Board Discussion and Action o Cook moved that the building architecture be accepted as submitted. o Olson seconded and the motion passed by majority vote of all members present. 6. OTHER BUSINESS: None 7. ADJOURNMENT: 8:10 p.m.