Loading...
03/23/1976 - Minutes MINUTES Tigard Site Development Plan & Architectural Design Review Board March 23, 1976 - 5:00 p.m. General Telephone Building 12460 Main St. , Tigard, Oregon 1. CALL TO ORDER: Meeting called to order at 5:15 p.m. by Chair- man McMonagle 2. ROLL CALL: Present: McMonagle, Olson, Wakem, Hammes, alternate Lakeman; staff: Bolen 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of 3/9/76 meeting approved as submitted. 4. COMMUNICATIONS: None 5. DESIGN REVIEW: 5.1 SDR 7-76 (Jerry's Barber Shop) A proposed commercial building which will stand in the place of the wood frame building now housing Jerry's Barber Shop, which will be removed from this location. A. Site Development Plan Review 1. Staff Report: read by Bolen. 2. Applicant Presentation: o Site plan presented by Charlotte Olson who stepped down from her position on the Board to represent her client, Jerry Hakola. She pointed out that the building will occupy nearly the entire site with the exception of the front 5 ft. She concurred with the staff recommendation that the landscaping should be in tune with that provided with the Repac Demonstration Landscape Project. 3. Board Discussion and Action o Lakeman moved to approve the submitted site plan with the conditions that the landscaping be coordinated with the Repac Demonstration Landscape Project and a hose Bibb be provided by the owner. o Motion seconded by Wakem. o Passed by unanimous vote of the 4 members voting. B. Architectural Design Review 1. Applicant's Presentation page 2 DRB Minutes 3/23/76 o The building architecture was presented by Charlotte Olson and she explained that,since the submission was made to the City, a new building design had been developed. She then stated that the Board now had before it two separate designs for their consideration. o McMonagle asked if Mr. Hakola had a preference for one over the other. o Olson responded that Mr. Hakola had been receptive to most of the design alternatives that she had come up with and he seemed to be in favor of either design. o Lakeman stated his preference for the originally submitted design and showed the members a sketch that he had made previous to the meeting which placed windows in the front for the second story room. o The other members concurred that they found the original design superior to the sketch submitted by Mrs. Olson at the meeting. o Lakeman moved to approve the original building design with the applicant considering the pro- vision of windows on the second level and that the window and signs on the lower level remain as per the original drawing. o Seconded by Hammes and passed by unanimous vote of the members voting. 5.2 SDR 6-76 (Bantrust Industrial Park Expansion) An expansion of the Bantrust Industrial Park on SW 72nd south of Boones Ferry Rd. A. Site Development Plan Review 1. Staff Report & Recommendation o Bolen presented the staff report and recommendation that the site plan be approved as submitted. 2. Applicant's Presentation o Fred Barrett presented the proposed site plan stating that the intent in this portion of the development is to go to smaller sized buildings. He said that this represents a change in the page 3 DRB Minutes 3/23/76 4AW market situation from 3 years ago when this project began. This change was due primarily to the rising energy costs and the expense of heating large interior spaces which are not required by certain tenants. 3. Board Discussion and Action o Lakeman stated that he found the smaller buildings "jumbled" in front of the larger lineal buildings to be an undesirable break from the original con- cept design. o Olson moved to approve the submitted site and landscape plan with the condition that an irri- gation plan be submitted to the staff. o Wakem seconded and the motion was approved by a majority vote, Lakeman dissenting. B. Architectural Design Review 1. Applicant's Presentation: o Fred Barrett presented the basic building layout and Rick Sieto, the project architect, presented the details of the architectural design. 2. Board Discussion and Action o Wakem asked if the air conditioning units would be roof mounted. o Sieto said they would be roof mounted for those tenants who desired them and the heating units would be placed within the building. o Lakeman expressed concern about the accent trim around the facia. He said he felt the trim color on the upper wall should be played down. o Hammes moved to approve the architectural design as submitted. o Wakem seconded and the motion passed unanimously. 6. OTHER BUSINESS: None 7. ADJOURNMENT: 6:45 p.m.