Loading...
07/13/1976 - Packet Agenda Tigard Site Development Plan and Architectural Design Review Board July 13, 1976 - 5:00 P.M. General Telephone Building 12460 Slid Main Street - Tigard, Oregon 1. CALL TO ORDER: 2. ROLL CALL: 3. MINUTES OF JUNE 22, 1976: 4. COMMUNICATIONS: 5. DESIGN REVI0,T 5.1 SDR 22-76 (Atlas Land Company) A request by Atlas Land Company for Design Review of a proposed 150001industrial building at 9380 SIJ Tigard Avenue. A. Site Development Plan Review. B. Architectural Design Review. 5.2 SDR 23-76 (National Safety Company) A request by National Safety Company for design review of a proposed industrial building at SVJT Bonita Rd. and S14 72nd Avenue. A. Site Development Plan Review. B. Architectural Design Review. 5.3 SDR 12-76 (J. A. Atwood Corp. ) A request by J. A. Atwood Corp. for design review of a proposed tri-plex development on SW Hill Street. A. Site Development Plan. B. Architectural Design Review. 6. OTHER BUSINESS; 7. ADJOUPN VIENT: V STAFF REPORT Tigard Site Development Plan and Architectual Design. Review Board July 13, 1976 - 5:00 p.m. General Telephone DOCKET: SDR 23-76 REQUEST: Site development review of a proposed 20000 square foot industrial warehouse. LOCATION: Bonita Rd west of S,^T 72nd (%vash Co. Tax Map 2S1 12A9 tax lot 1900) . APPLICANT: National Safety Company. BASIC FACTS: 1. Site is designated general industrial on Tigard Community Plan and zoned ISI-3 ZLight Industrial) . 2. The Tigard Community Plan designate SLt7 Bonita Rd as a CD collector street. 3. The existing site is presently vacant with overgro`�m native vegetation. 4. The surrounding land use is flood plain to the south, u vacant to the east, existing industrial building with General Chain Company on the west and Sabre Construction Company on the north. 5. The surrounding zoning is TSI-3 Industrial. FINDIiVGS: 1. Section 18.12.100 requires 30' additional center line setback from SVT Bonita Rd. The site plan shows no center line present. The right away width of Bonita Road is 401 . An additional 10' is necessary to provide the adequate width. 2. The applicant has proposed a general industrial building with no particular occupant secured as tenant. Any use of the building would be subject to the permitted and conditional uses allovTed in the M-3 zone and a--,,ay use would require approval by the Planning Commission. 3. Upon review of this request an illegal minor land partition- ing was discovered. The applicant has submitted an application for rectifying the partitioning problem. The lot as proposed is approximately 2 acres, meeting all the lot size requirements of Section 1C,.45.30. 1*01 4. The site plan as proposed satisfies all setback and height limitation requirements of the code. STAFF REPORT Ti,_rard Site Development Plan and Architectual Desifn. Review Board July 13, 1976 - 5:00 p.m. wow General Telephone 5. The site plan proposes three 301 curb cuts. ';Then meeting with the applicant upon submission of the site plan, the engineering department informed the applicant 301 curb cuts were the maximum allowed. The applicant then re- designed his proposal to have three rather than the two 501 curb cuts as initially proposed. The staff finds that a better site will be afforded if the three 301 curb cuts were eliminated and replaced by two 451 curb cuts. This could accomo- dated by switching the landscaped areas with the proposed driveway areas as shown on the site plan. 6. The parking and driveways areas are shown for asphalt pavement but no cross section of the parking lot has been shown.. The Tigard Municipal Code requires that all parking areas be constructed to the same standards required for local streets. These standards being 611 of base rock with 4t1 of asphalt overlay. 7. Section 18.60.121 requires that for general industrial buildings one space for each employee on the largest shift or one space for each 1000 square feet whichever is larger. Without knowing the occupant of the building the one space for 1000 square feet should be adhered to. The size of the proposed building is 20000 square feet thus requiring 20 parking spaces. Twenty spaces are shown on the site plan but in changing the access drives some parking spaces may be eliminated thus requiring a re-design of the parking area. S. Section 18.58.080 of the Tigard T`Tunicipal Code requires that the front 201 of the property be landscaped. The site plan shows two landscaped islands. In modifying the curb cuts areas it would extend this to three. Poplar trees are shown to be located on the site. These appear to be adequate on the east area but by themselves would be inadequate and the addition of evergreens such as a shore pine would provide screening during the winter months. 9. Ivy is shown as ground cover but no particular type is shown.. A hardy ivy such as Baltic would be appropriate on the site. Changing the tree type to a maple or an oak adjacent to the building would provide a better shade screen for the parking area next to the building. 10. Landscaping along the west side of the parking area appears to be inadequate. Additional trees, both poplar and ever- green, should be added. No ground cover is shown. A continuation of the ground cover along the front should be ;w placed in this area. 11. All landscaped areas should be curbed where adjacent to parking and driving areas. STAFF REPORT Tigard Site Development Plan and Architectual Design Review Board July 13, 1976 -- 5:00 p.m. e General Telephone 12. Section 18.58.080 (2) Tigard 1,1unicipal code requires that all areas not occupied by paved roadways, structures, or walkways should be landscaped. The areas to the rear of the building are shown for natural vegetation. This should be supplemented by the addition of moisture tolerant trees (Red a,faple, Alder or Willow) and other vegetation to stabilize the bank area of the flood plain. 13. The site plan shows two catch basins with drainage directly into the flood plain. It should be noted that during last winter a year of light rainfall the intersection of Bonita Road and 72nd was flooded. A drainage retention system should be developed. 14. Bonita Road at this point is substandard. A non remonstrance agreement against future street improvements appears to be necessary in order to further develop the road system in this portion of the industrial area. 15. Section 18.58.090 requires all utility lines be placed underground. 16. M?T Bonita Road is county road. Access permits are required for all new entrances on to the right way. 17. The site plan shows some fill in the flood plain. A flood plain fill permit is necessary. A. Denial B. If approved the following conditions should be attached, 1. PC approval of the minor land partition. 2. The driveways be enlarged to 451 as opposed to 30' as shown on the site plan. 3. The asphalt driveway and parking areas be built to city code. The location of parking spaces be adjusted to take into consideration the number of access points. 4. An equal amount of evergreen trees be added to the landscape areas. 5. All landscape areas be curbed as they abutt paved areas. ,. 6. The ivy ground cover be Baltic type. 7. Landscaping be added to the rear of the building with the addition of water tolerant trees such as Jillow, red maple or alder. STAFF REPORT Tigard Site Development Plan and Architectual Design Review Board July 13, 1976 - 5:00 p.m. wrw General Telephone S. No fill be allowed in flood plain. 9. A drainage retention system be developed and approved by city engineering department. 10. A non remonstrance agreement be executed prior to the issuance of building permit agreeing not to remonstrate against future street improvemeitu to SW Bonita Rd. 11. Access permits for the two access points be acquired by Washington County Public Works. 12. A 10' street dedication for future street improvements be executed prior to issuance to building permit. 13. Additional trees be added to the front of the building and located so as not to be directly over sanitary sewer lines.