Loading...
08/10/1976 - Packet AGENDA Tigard Site Development Plan & Architectural Design Review Board ` August 10, 1976 - 5 :00 P.M. General Telephone Building 12460 S .W. Main Street Tigard, Oregon 1 . CALL TO ORDER: 2 . ROLL CALL : 3 . APPROVAL OF MINUTES : 4 . COMMUNICATIONS : 5 . DESIGN REVIEW 5 . 1 SDR 27-76 (Marine Lumber) A request for review of a proposed lumber storage shed on Pfaffle Street near S .W . Pacific Highway . (Wash . Co . Tax Map 1S1 36CD, tax lots 100, 300) . A. Site Development Plan B . Architectural Design low 5 .2 SDR 29-76 (Concession Stand) A request by Babe Ruth, Inc . and Tigard School District No . 23 for review of a proposed concession stand at Fowler Jr. High School . (Wash . Co . Tax Map 2S1 3AA, tax lot 101) . A. Site Development Plan B. Architectural Design 5 . 3 SDR 30-76 (Motor Vehicles Registration Building) CONTINGENT UPON A request by R. C . Malin Company for review of a proposed COUNCIL Department of Motor Vehicles Registration Building at ACTION 12985 S .W. Hall Blvd. at the intersection of S .W. Hall Blvd. 8/9/76 and S . W. Burnham. (Wash . Co. Tax Map 2S1 2DA, tax lot 200) . A. Site Development Plan B. Architectural Design 5 .4 SDR 31-76 (Emjay ' s Home Furnishing) A request for review of a remodel of a commercial building at 12555 S .W. Main St . (Wash . Co. Tax Map 2S1 2AC, tax lot 800) . vo* A. Architectural Design 5. 5 SDR 32-76 (Ripley ' s Maple Shop) A request for review of a proposed parking lot at 14170 S .W. Pacific Highway . (Wash . Co . Tax Map 2S1 10A, tax lot 301) . A . Site Development Plan 6 . OTHER BUSINESS 7. ADJOURNMENT TO: Design Review Board FRU 1: Staff RE : August 10 Meeting Please note the inclusion of the site plan for the proposed Department of Motor Vehicles but no accompanying staff report . This matter has been scheduled for hearing by the Council. on appeal Monday, August 9 . If the Planning Commission approval. is upheld, Lae item will be heard by the Design Review Board Tuesday; if not - no need for a staff report . w low STAFF REPORT Agenda 5. 1 Tigard Site Development Plan & Architectural Design Review Board 4W August 10 , 1976 - 5 : 00 p .m. General Telephone Building 12460 S .W . Main Street Tigard, Oregon DOCKET: SDR 27-76 REQUEST: Review of a proposed lumber storage building in a C-3, General Commercial zone . LOCATION : 11675 SW Pacific Highway (Wash . Co . Tax Map 1S1 36CD, tax lot 100) . APPLICANT : Marine Lumber Company BASIC FACTS : 1 . The site is designated "General Commercial" on the Tigard Community Plan and zoned "C-3 , General Commercial . " 2 . A permit was approved August 3, 1976, for reconstructing the storage shed on the same foundation which is non- conforming as to side ,yard setback. The approval. was granted subject to the following conditions, low 1. ) "A landscape plan be submitted to Design Review Board which includes sight obscuring plantings along the north and wast property lines and an attempt be made to provide some landscaping in the front of the build- ing adjacent Pfaffle St . and SW Pacific Highway , where a 10 ' landscaped setback is required. 2) That five feet of additional right-of-way be dedicated on SW Pfaffle St . for future widening. " FINDINGS : 1 . The applicant is requesting site development plan review of a proposed 4000 sq . ft . lumber storage shed approved as a non-conforming use by the Planning Commission . 2 . The planting shown on the corner of SW Pacific and Pfaffle St . specifies dwarf mugo pine 9 to 10 ' on center . Dwarf mugo average only 3 to 4 feet at full maturity. 3. The area shown to be landscaped at the intersection is presently covered with asphalt paving and thus there is a need for adequate site preparation . 4 . The landscaped area will be adjacent to parking stalls and IAw therefore will need some type of protection . 5 . The planting shown beneath the existing sign specifies 2 Pieris Japonica. Pieris are shade and moisture loving plants and are not considered 'hardy enough for parking lot conditions . �taf Report genAa 5. 1 Tigard Design Review Board August 10 , 1976 Page 2 RECOMMENDATIONS : 1 . The landscape design at the intersection of SW Pacific and Pfaffle St . specifies too great of a distance between plant material . In order to keep down weeds and to form a more pleasing design additional low plantings should be added. 2 . Adequate site preparation should be made for the inter- section plantings. This preparation should include an improved top soil mix surrounding the root balls and a hole dug for the roots to be 12 to 2 times the size of the root system. 3 . Curbing should be placed along the west side of the inter- section planting to protect it from cars maneuvering within the parking lot . 4 . The specified Pieris Japonica should be replaced with a hardier plant material . Vine Maples or similar shrubs are recommended as they would be more in scale to the sign and could be positioned so as not to block the copy . 5 . Proper irrigation equipment should be provided to see that plants receive adequate water during the first couple years of growth . AW STAFF REPORT Agenda 5 . 2 %W Tigard Site Development Plan & Architectural Design Review Board August 10, 1976 - 5 : 00 P.M. General Telephone Building 1.2460 S . W. Main Street Tigard, Oregon DOCKET: SDR 29-76 REQUEST: Review of a proposed concession stand/ facilities building and parking lot . LOCATION : Fowler Junior High School at SW Walnut Street and SW Tiedeman St . (Wash . Co . Tax Map 2S1 3AA, tax lot 101 ) . APPLICAiNT: Tigard School District No . 23/Babe Ruth , Inc . BASIC FACTS : 1 . The site is designated "Urban Low Density Residential" on the Tigard Community Plan and zoned "R-7, Single Family Residential" . 2 . A conditional use permit - CU 9-72 , was approved by the Planning Commission on July 18 , 1972 , for a Junior High School . 3. The original conditional use plan was amended on July 21 , 1976, by the City Council upon appeal to allow a con- cession stand/facilities building and field lights with the following conditions: A. All utilities serving the site be placed underground. B. That the building be one story only. C . That a drinking fountain be placed on the exterior of the building for continual use during off-school hours . D. That restrooms be designed in such a manner as to minimize the possibility of vandalism and be available for use during off hours . E . That trash recepticals be built into the building so as to have sanitary recepticals continually available. F. That a minimum of four recepticals (additional ) be available during the use of the field. G. That the building and parking area be subject to the Design Review Board. N` if. That the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that no parking be permitted along SW Walnut St . in the area of the proposed fieldhouse. STAFF REPORT Agenda 5 . 2 Design Review Board August 10 , 1976 Page 2 I . That a fast growing type of tree be planted between the tennis courts and SW Walnut Street from the entrance drive to the west property line. J. That a restricted curfew of 11 P.M. be instituted beyond which the lights may not be used. FINDINGS : Parking lot 1 . A 43 space parking area was shown on the site plan approved for the school site in 1972 . The parking area is shown for a relatively flat area between the existing tennis courts and baseball field. 2 . Section 18 . 60 . 160 of the Tigard Municipal Code requires parking spaces to be a minimum 916" in width . The site plan shows 9 ' wide spaces . 3 . The Tigard Municipal Code requires planting areas 70 ' on center in parking areas . The two large planting areas at the ends of the central parking spaces satisfies this requirement . 4 . Section 18 .64 .020 of the Tigard Municipal Code requires a 30 ' minimum curb cut onto a local street . This also appears applicable on this site due to the right angle turn within the parking lot to exit . The site plan shows an approximately 25 ' curb cut . 5 . The site plan shows "new asphalt paving" . Section 18 .60 . 170 of the Tigard Municipal Code requires that "Except in connection with single family uses, all areas used for the standing or maneuvering of vehicles shall be improved according to the same specifications as required for city streets . " 6 . Drainage appears adequate . 7 . The lot layout creates triangular shaped dead spots normally found in 300, 600 and 450 parking spaces . These should be curbed and landscaped. 8 . Shade trees along the east and west perimeter of the parking lot would provide screening and improve the lot . 1W STAFF REPORT Agenda 5 . 2 Design Review Board August 10, 1976 Page 3 Concession Stand/Fa.c,il_ii;ies Building 1 . The site plan as submitted does not specify the location of an exterior drinking fountain , trash recepticals , or type of trees to be planted along SW Walnut as per the conditional use permit . RECOMMENDATION : Approval with the following conditions : 1 . All noted code deficiencies be rectified. 2 . The landscape islands include deciduous {shade trees such as Norway Maple with appropriate ground cover . 3 . Similar type trees to those located in the .landscape islands be located along the east and west perimeter of the parking lot and along SW Walnut St . Aw STAFF REPORT - Agenda 5 .4 Tigard Site Development Plan & Architectural Design Review Board August 10, 1976 - 5 : 00 P.M. wry. General Telephone Building 12460 S .W. Main Street Tigard, Oregon DOCKET: SDR 31-76 REQUEST: Review of a proposed remodeling of a furniture store. LOCATION: 12555 S .W . Main St . (Wash . Co . Tax Map 2S1 2AC , tax lot 800) . APPLICANT: Max and Michael Huvelhorst BASIC FACTS : 1 . The site is designated "Retail Commercial" on the Neighbor- hood Plan I and zoned "C-3M, Main St . Commercial . " 2 . A furniture store is an outright permitted use in a C-3M" zone and is in accord with Neighborhood Plan I . 3. Policy 23: "The redevelopment of downtown should be accomplished in order to make it complementary to newer shopping areas . Convenience, appearance and the needs of the shopping public should be primary considerations . " (Neighborhood Plan I ) FINDINGS : 1 . The building in question pre-existed the code and thus is non-conforming as to the Tigard Municipal Code regarding parking, landscaping, and signing. 2 . The architectural plan proposes one projecting wood sign and two wall signs . There is currently one projecting sign, one roof top sign, and two wall signs existing on the site. o The building is beyond 2 ' from the front property line and according to Sections 16 .40 .070 and 16 . 40 . 080 neither a roof or projecting- sign is allowed. o The proposed wall signs snow no specifications as to material , color, etc . 3 . The sidewalk area in front of the store is 14 ' to 24 ' wide by 100 ' long. 4 . A 2 ' x 2 ' brick planter 20 ' long presently exists along the front window. STAFF REPORT Agenda 5 .4 Design Review Board August 10 , 1976 Page 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS : Signs 1 . Materials and colors should be agreed upon by the applicant and the Design Review Board for the two wall signs. 2 . The proposed projecting sign would not be permitted accord- ing to the Tigard Municipal Code therefore the applicant and the Design Review Board should consider an agreeable solution . 3. The existing roof sign and projecting sign should be eliminated. Landscaping In keeping with the Neighborhood Plan I to revitablize the down- town area some type of landscaping should be added to the front of the building. This could be accomplished by enlarging the existing brick planter along the length of the building or constructing a landscape island in front of the store. wwW STAFF REPORT Agenda 5 . 5 Tigard Site Development Plan & Architectural Design Rev=iew Board August 10, 1976 - 5 : 00 P.M. General Telephone Building 12460 S .W. Main Street Tigard, Oregon DOCKET: SDR 32-76 REQUEST: Review of a proposed parking lot LOCATION: 14170 SW Pacific Highway (Wash . Co . Tax Map 2S1 10A, tax lot 301) . APPLICANT: Ripley ' s Maple Shop BASIC FACTS : 1 . The site is designated Residential Commercial on the Tigard Community Plan and zoned C-3, General Commercial . 2 . On July 26 , 1976 , the City Council rezoned the parcel. from C-4 , Neighborhood Commercial to C-3, General Commercial . This action was conditioned upon satisfying the following : 1) Tax lots 300 and 301 be combined into one tax lot . ANW 2) A total of two entrances be permitted into the site, the location of which to be determined by the Tigard Design Review Board at the time expansion of the exist- ing facility is proposed. 3) When the existing facility is expanded the present parking lot and driveway will be brought up to city code, including paving and landscaping. FINDINGS : 1 . Section 18 .60 . 170 states "Except in connection with single family uses, all areas used for the standing or maneuvering of vehicles shall be improved according to the same specifica- tions as required for city streets" . No paving cross section has been submitted. 2 . The determination by the Design Review Board (condition 2 of the zone change) as to which two of the three entrances should remain, should be done at this time before a commitment to these two access points is made . 3. Section 18 .60 . 180 of the Tigard Municipal Code requires wheel blocks. None are shown. A&W 4 . Section 18 .60 . 190 of the Tigard Municipal Code requires parking lots to be drained so as to avoid the flow of water across public sidewalks and streets. STAFF REPORT Agenda 5 . 5 Design Review Board August 10 , 1976 Page 2 5. No provision .for pedestrian traffic along Pacific Highway is shown on the site plan . A 51 sidewalk would allow a pedestrian traffic way separate from the 40 IDPH vehicular traffic . 6 . The site plan shows paving up to the south property line . Section 18 .60 . 100 states , "Required off-street parking shall be allowed in any yard setback, provided that the first two feet in from the property line are maintained in landscaping. " 7. Section 18 .60 . 160 of the Tigard Municipal Code requires a 24 ' back out space for a 900 parking space. The spaces shown along the front of the building are shown for a 20 ' backout . 8 . No evidence of satisfaction of condition # 1 of the zone change has been submitted. RECOMMENDATION: The deficiencies noted in the staff findings are relatively minor and can be easily corrected. The staff and applicant have met and resolved many of them. Staff recommends approval with the following conditions , 1 . A drainage plan be approved by the Engineering Department . 2 . All noted code deficiencies be rectified.