06/20/1974 - Minutes MINUTES
TIGARD SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
Regular Meeting
June 20, 1974
Twality Jr. High School - lecture room
14650 S. W. 97th Ave. , Tigard, Oregon
1. CALL TO ORDER
A. The meeting was called to order at 7:40 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
A. Edin, McMonagle, Bartel, Mickelson and Mann were
present, Cook was absent.
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. The minutes of the June 6, 1974, regular meeting were
approved as submitted.
4. SITE DESIGN REVIEW
SDR 10-74 (Long and Maxwell Office)
Representatives Long, Maxwell and Associates appeared
to present color samples of their proposed new office
structure to be located at 11825 S. W. Greenburg Road.
The Design Review Board required that the applicant
submit, for design review board approval, color and
texture samples for all exterior surfaces as a con-
dition to the approval of the building style at their
June 6, 1974, meeting.
Applicant brought samples of used brick, black asphalt
shingles and white aluminum siding.
A. Architectural Review
1. The applicant stated that the doors would be
white. The applicant was not sure of the gutter
color, stating the fascia color and gutter were
to be the same color, probably white, and the
shutters were to be black vinyl coated.
2. Bartel asked applicant if he would consider other
color alternatives.
3. Mickelson felt that a color rendering would
be appropriate.
4. McMonagle and Bartel felt only a color board
was necessary.
5. Discussion ensued concerning the roof color.
6. McMonagle stated he wanted to see available color
alternatives.
7. There was a concensus of the Board that color
alternatives should be in the same price range
and that it was desirable to see alternate roof
colors.
8. Mickelson moved that the city issue a building
permit and that the Planning Director place this
Design Review Board item on the July 11 Design
Review Board agenda. In addition, Mickelson
continued his motion stating that the applicant
shall submit additional color samples of the roof,
shutters and doors, said color samples to portray
available color options. McMonagle seconded the
motion and the motion passed by unanimous vote of
those members present with Mann abstaining because
he was not familiar with the applicant' s proposal.
4.1 SDR 14-74 (Northern Yards)
Request by Northern Yards, Inc. for review of new ware-
house and office facility for wholesale lumber distri-
bution on a site located 800 feet westerly of S. W. 72nd
Avenue and 1200 feet northerly of S. W. Bonita Road.
Site comprises 5 acres (Tax Map 2S1 12A, Tax Lot 602) .
A. Site Development Plan
1. The staff presented slides of the site and read
the staff findings as presented in the staff
report of June 20, 1974.
2. Mike McGee of Sabre Construction Co. represented
the applicant.
3. Design Review Board then discussed the following
items:
o Grades on the northeastern corner of the site
o Irrigation of plant materials
o Cost of hose bibs
Page 2 - SDR Minutes - June 20, 1974
o Use of plastic pipe for irrigation
%W o Hose bibs for cleaning of asphalt
o Maneuvering within the parking area adjacent
the office
4. Mann moved to approve the applicant' s site and
landscape plans subject to the satisfaction of
the following conditions:
1. That the applicant receive approval of their
submitted drainage plan from the City Public
Works Dept. The applicant shall, upon request
from said department, furnish this topographic-
al information as is necessary to determine
slopes on the subject site.
2. The applicant' s site plan shall meet all re-
quirements of Title 18 Tigard Municipal Code.
3. That the applicant submit for staff approval,
a revised landscaping plan indicating the
type of ground cover treatment proposed for
those areas specified in finding 2 of the
staff report. Said revised plan shall also
indicate the proposed location and spacing
`+arw of hose bibs or shall provide certification
from a landscape architect or horticulturist
that all plant materials shall survive periods
of drought.
B. Architectural Review
1. The Design Review Board questioned the applicant' s
representative, Mr. McGee, and received the follow-
ing replies :
o The precast tilt walls are 7 feet high to pro-
tect them from fork lift truck drivers.
o The exterior of the office is to be stained
cedar siding, tongue and groove, 4 inch.
o Gutters are to be black.
o The roof is to be unpainted aluminum.
o The concrete precast walls are to be plain con-
crete finish.
o Light panels on the roof are to be plastic
window frames.
Page 3 - SDR Minutes - June 20, 1974
o The office window frames are bronze aluminum.
The office is to be air conditioned with roof
mounted units.
2. Mann was concerned about the aluminum roof and
rooftop mechanical units, their location and
concealment.
3. Bartel also voiced similar concerns.
4. Much discussion ensued concerning how to conceal
the mechanical rooftop units.
5. McMonagle moved to accept the architectural plans
as submitted by the applicant subject to the satis-
faction of the following conditions :
That the rooftop air conditioning units be placed
a minimum 30 feet behind the southeasterly edge
of the roof of the main building and that they
be placed in line so as to be less visible from
the entrance street. Edin seconded the motion and
the motion passed by unanimous vote of all members
present.
ADJOURNMENT: 9:00 p.m.
4W
Page 4 - SDR Minutes - June 20, 1974