Loading...
08/08/1974 - Minutes MINUTES TIGARD SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Regular Meeting August 8, 1974 Twality Junior High School - lecture room 14650 S. W. 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon 1. CALL TO ORDER A. The meeting was called to order at 4:08 p.m,, 2. ROLL CALL A. Bartel, C,,,,ok, McMonagle , Kelting were present,, Mici,c,el_son was absent, 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. The minutes of the June 20, 1974 regular meeting were approved as submitted. 4. SITE DESIGN REVIEW SDR 15-74 (u. S. National Bank of Oregon) Request by U. S. National Bank of Oregon for review of a new drive-in bank facility located on 'the westerly corner of S. W. 71st and Pacific Highway, adjacent to Fred Meyer shopping center. Site comprises .39 acres and is located in a C-3, General Commercial zone. (Tax Map lSl 36B, Tax Lot 100) . A. Site Development Plan Review 1. The staff presented staff findings as included, in the staff report of August 8, 1974. 2, The Design Review Board discussed with staff and the architect the true location of the sidewalk. Ted Chillis, architect for U. S. National Bank on sub- ject project, stated that the true location of the sidewalk was four feet toward the site from the location shown on the site plan. 3� McMonagle questioned, what process the Planning Com- mission utilized to examine the site in terms of access during the site 's previous conditional use consideration by the Planning Commission. 4. Chillis explained the process and history .-,,f the subject project' s consideration by the Planning Commission, 5. Kelting questioned the traffic flow from the in banking facility through Fred Meyer' s parking lot and expressed a desire for an express lane to route traffic from the drive-in bank facility to an exit point in the Fred Meyer parking lot. 6. Bartel expressed his feeling that the Design Review Board took over the function of site review from the Planning Commission. 7. Brooks explained that the Planning Commission had considered the traffic circulation problems thoroughly on the subject site and that U. S. National Bank had expended time and money to solve the problems being discussed by the Design Review Board. Brooks also stated that he felt the problems had been solved and it would be unreasonable for the Design Review Board to make major changes in the Planning mission's conditional use approval. 8. Design Review Board discussed generally the closing of the proposed entrance between S. W. 71st and Fred Meyer' s existing major entrance on S. W. Pacific Highway. 9. The Design Review Board also generally discussed the adequacy of the landscaping, particularly the adequacy of landscaping in the areas described for bark chips on the submitted site plan. The appli- cant stated that a full irrigation system was planned for the entire site to provide water to plant mater- ials. 10. Kelting moved to approve the applicant's submitted site landscaping plans subject to satisfaction of the conditions as embodied in the staff report, said conditions being as follows: 1) That the applicant submit a revised land- scaping plan indicating additional ground- cover or shrt.tbs within the area designated for bark chips .,)n the applicant's landscape plan submission. Said revised landscape plan shall be subject to approval by the City Planning Department. Page 2 - SDR Minutes - August 8, 1974 2) That the applicant submit an irrigation plan providing water to all plant mater- ials. Said irrigation plan shall be sub- ject to the approval of the City Planning Department. Cook seconded the motion and the motion was passed. by unanimous vote of those members present, B. Architectural Review le Ted Chillis, architect for U. S. National Bank of Oregon on subject project, presented the architect- ural style and described the architectural materials to be used on the subject building. Chillis stated that the building was to be constructed in fire zone 2 and was to be located close to the street, con- sequently he was recommending an exterior metal pre- finished brown enamel siding. Solar bronze glass would be used in the window areas. 2. There was a general discussion of the need for customer parking. It was felt by the Design Review board that the spaces shown on the site plan should '++ be used for customer parking and that employee park- ing would be best located in the Fred Meyer Parking lots 3. Kelting asked Chillis if alternate materials were available which would provide a warmer feeling to the building. 4. Chillis replied that his material choice was the most appropriate for the proposed building use and location. 5. Cook asked about exterior mechanical equipment. 6. Chillis answered that a condenser would be required for the mechanical system and that such condenser would be landscaped and screened. 7. There was a general discussion of exterior lighting fixtures. The applicant replied that 'the fixtures had not yet been chosen, but that they would be generally small in scale and match the character of the proposed building in. architectural. style. 8. Bartel stated he felt the building had an attractive, clean appearance, Page 3 - SDR Minutes - August 8, 1974 9. Cook moved to approve the building style and materials as submitted. McMonagle seconded the motion and the motion passed with McMonagle, Cook and Bartel voting yes; Kelting voting no. 4.2 SDR 1674 (Hiranport Company) A request by Hiranport Company for review of a warehouse expansion located at 7585 S. W. Hunziker St. Site comprises 1.84 acres and is located within an M-4, Industrial Park zone. (Tax Map 2S1 1AC, Tax Lot 1800) . A. Site Development Plan Review 1. Staff presented findings as included in staff re- port of August 8, 1974. Design Review Board discussed the unlandscaped areas as shown on the site plan and the possibility of placing con- ditions on the site plan as shown rather than tabling to the next meeting. 2. Charles Hagel, architect, was present and rep- resented the Hiranport Co. 3. Further discussion continued by the Design Review Board with such things as the type of landscaping that would be appropriate in -the situation and truck maneuvering and parking. Kelting moved that the applicant ' s site de- velopment and landscape plan be approved sub- ject to the applicant meeting those conditions as were discussed by the Design Review Board, Said site plan and landscaping plan to be sub- mitted to the staff for final approval. 4. McMonagle proposed an amendment to the motion that would include the condition that the east- erly portion of the site being held for future development be mown and kept in a neat condition. This amendment was accepted by Mr. Kelting. The staff asked for clarification of the con- ditions -to which the applicant would be sub- jected before staff could give approval. The said conditions are as follows: o The proposed landscape area north of the proposed warehouse addition shall include additional trees, groundcover, lawn and shrubs. Page SDR Minutes - August 8, 1974 �Wrr o Said northerly landscaped area shall be irrigated and maintained as originally constructed. o The area along the westerly property line adjacent the proposed warehouse structure and parking and maneuvering areas shall include additional trees and groundcover. Said westerly land- scaping shall be protected by an ex- truded curb in the parking and maneuver- ing area. Cook seconded the motion as amended and the motion was passed by unanimous vote of those members present. B. Architectural Review 1. Charles Hagel, architect for the applicant, explained the architectural design of the building which was proposed to be mixed ex- posed aggregate concrete tilt-up walls with metal ribbed siding extending from the top of the tilt--up walls to the roof with sky- lights incorporated into the ribbed metal siding. 2. The Design Review Board discussed the skylight materials and spacing and the definition of the skylights. 3. The Board reached concensus on the skylights that they should reflect the module of the tilt-up concrete slabs. 4. Kelting moved that the architectural plans and materials be approved with the condition that the skylights be revised as discussed to reflect the module of the tilt-up exposed aggregate con- crete slabs. Cook seconded the motion and the motion passed by unanimous vote of those present. 5. OTHER BUSINESS SDR 10-74 (Long and Maxwell office) 1. Mr. Ed Long, representing Long and Maxwell Engineers, presented his feeling that the conditions placed upon him by the Design Review Board at their June 20, 1974, Page 5 - SDR Minutes - August 8, 1974 meeting could not be met. He stated these conditions could not be met because no other similar materials in the same price range existed for his building. He continued, stating that his desire was to continue his scheme for black asphalt shingles, black shutters and used brick facia. Mr. Long then showed photos of other structures with similar color and material schemes. The Design Review Board agreed with Mr. Long that his proposed motif was not objectionable to the colonial building style. 2, McMonagle moved to approve the originally proposed colors as submitted by the applicant. 3. Cook seconded the motion and the motion passed by unanimous vote of those present, with the exception of Bartel who abstained. 6. ADJOURNMENT A. The meeting was adjourned at 5:30 p.m. Page 6 - SDR Minutes - August 8, 1974 I%W