Loading...
03/06/1975 - Packet AGENDA TIGARD SITE DEVELOPMENT & DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Regular Meeting - March 6, 1975 - 4:30 p.m. Twality Junior High School - Lecture Room 14650 SW 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 4. SITE DESIGN & ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 4.1 SDR 4-75 (Setniker Auto Repair) A request for review of a proposed auto repair shop to be con- structed in a C-3 zone on SW Pacific Hwy. (tax lot 2000, tax map 2S1 2CB) . 4.2 SDR 5-75 (Sabre Construction/Bethlehem Steel Building) A request for review of a proposed warehouse and office space to be constructed in an M-2 zone on SW Landmark Lane off SW 72nd (part of tax lot 600, tax map 2S1 12A) . «+w 4.3 SDR 7-75 (Greenburg Plaza II) — Mike Mahon A request for review of a proposed office building to be con- structed on a C-3 zoned site on SW Greenburg Rd. between Lincoln Avenue and Center Street. Site is presently occupied by a two story stucco and frame church (tax lot 200, tax map 1S1 35DC) . 5. OTHER BUSINESS 6. ADJOURNMENT TIGARD SITE DEVELOPMENT & DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Staff Report March 5, 1975 SDR 4-75 (Setniker Auto Repair) Applicant John Setniker Applicant' s Proposal to build a 3 bay auto repair shop with a gas pump for his own use. Applicant proposes to leave existing single family house on .86 acre site, using 9000 sq. ft. for the proposed shop. Site Development Plan and Architectural Review of a proposed auto repair sho in a C-3 zone on SW Pacific Hwy. (tax lot 2000, Wsl - 2CB� Staff Findings 1. Existing frontage road is approximately 16 ' wide and shares right-of-way with Pacific Hwy. 2. Building conforms to setback requirements of the C-3 zone ( 110" side yard, 10 ' front yard) . 3. Parking requirements based on 2000 sq. ft. building with 3 people employed there is 7 parking spaces (Tigard Munici- pal Code Ch. 18.60) . Applicant has documented to Washington County Planning Department in a letter dated February 7, 1975, that he has ordinarily parked five vehicles (trucks, pickups and cars) of his own at his service station which he used in his business and that he owned five more vehicles which he ordinarily parked at home. The site plan provides 9 parking spaces for the auto repair shop. 4. The conditional use permit granted by the City of Tigard allows auto repair with the condition "that wrecked vehicles not be stored on the site and that any other outside stor- age of vehicles should be screened. " 5. The drawings as resubmitted address substantially the re- quired information for review by the Design Review Board excepting: a. signs, materials and colors b. color scheme C. grading plan d. floor plan (unless original floor plan is still to be used ,,�, Staff has not, therefore, reviewed those issues. 6. Sight obscuring fence or vegetation as required by Ch. 18.60 Tigard Municipal Code (parking) does not appear to meet requirements. 7. Staff feels the juxtaposition of the auto repair shop and the single family home on this one site is unfortunate and feels that the dwelling will be replaced with some commercial building as soon as the dwelling becomes an economically unsound enterprise or actually becomes a nuisance. Staff therefore has evaluated the site with the option of an additional commercial structure on the dwelling site as a future possibility. Under those circumstances, staff still finds that the site fills present legal require- ments , but will require careful site planning. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the site plan and the architectural design if the questions of finding ##5 are adequately answered by the applicant and with the following conditions: 1. No parking will be allowed on or adjacent to the frontage road or in the access areas. 2. that the applicant execute an agreement with the City notito oppose an L. I. D. to improve the frontage road to City stan- dards. 3. If at any time the on-site parking approved by this action becomes insufficient to serve the activities on the site the applicant will expand his parking area and will apply for design review. 4. No service vehicles, tow trucks or automobiles are to be stored at the site unless stored inside the building or in a screened, locked storage area. Such area may not be part of that area presently designated "parking". SDR staff report - March 6, 1975 - page 2 T -IP TIGARD SITE DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Staff Report March 5, 1975 SDR 5-75 (Bethlehem Steel Building) Applicant Sabre Construction Co. Applicant' s Proposal to build a 14,000 sq. ft. warehouse including 2340 sq. ft. of office space with loading docks for rail and truck on a 46,000 sq. ft. site. Site Development Plan and Architectural Review of a proposed warehouse and office in an M-2 zone on SW Landmark Lane off SW 72nd Avenue (part of tax lot 600, tax map 2S1-12A) Staff Findings 1. Several deficiencies in applicant' s submission are noted: a. Site plan does not show relationship to existing develop- ment on either Northern Yards or Owens Corning site (paragraph 2, Ch. 18.58.030) . b. Location, size, materials of sign(s) is not _%hown. C. Size of "plantings" not shown. 2. It is noted that the street width is 32 ' and not 50' as whown (50 ' street "as shown" is the right-of-way line) . 3. Landscaping is required in parking areas approximately 70 ' on center. Area shown as "truck maneuvering area" exceeds optimum maneuvering area requirements. Skimply landscaping in this area would benefit from an effort to meet code requirements. Paved area appears excessive to needs. 4. Irrigation system not indicated. 5. What is a cortina pine? 6. Applicant has previously applied for SDR on adjacent Northern Yards site. 7. Tigard Planning Commission approved 10 ' setback variance on east side of btilding on the condition that applicant complete dedication of Landmark Street and his major land partition on this site. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval on the condition that: 1. The planting area on the west side of parking area be 10 ' rather than 5 ' shown; that additional plantings at the south end of the parking area be provided with major plantings compatible with Northern Yards landscaping be provided in the southwest corner of the parking lot. 2. Decrease planting interval of "cortina pines" (sic) to 15 or 20 ft. or plant upright deciduous trees. 3. Provide more significant planting on west property line. Recommend at least 6 ' evergreen plant height, not necessarily a hedge, however. 1460 MAW SDR Staff Report - March 5, 1975 - page 2 3 SITE DEVELOPMENT & DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Staff Report March 5, 1975 SDR 7-75 (Greenburg Plaza II) Applicant Mike Mahon Applicant' s Request to raze an existing two story frame stucco church and build a two story office building adjacent to his existing "Greenburg Plaza" building. Staff Findings 1. Applicant' s submission appears to be adequate but lacks: a. grading plan b. sign location, design, etc. c. utility service connections 2. Ground cover in front of building outside property line and to rear of building appears too sparse. 3. Parking and access conforms to code requirements. Staff Recommendation approval if no sign is to be provided on this building. Should applicant wish to provide a sign, it should be subject to design review. ,, ; • CONSTRUCTION DGt DINTS v vL: Z I44. _ 'g / l x le. e/4l/. ZV63 DVfr/7f Y� OJTK 0,4e p . -BA L SA u /'"d w/R t -- : Ole Egc/A�L ,.- .erv7E .s- 8 $ C•% SEAT /fid~ 3� •. Soo ' :Cz-,q ye�vlc� f��2Cf//T,EG TS DRAW/NG _Z75 T//► A TOk 5 B/0 wo T•,E• No. / ZNG//VEE.QS ,O eSl6AI - -. ._ ti![L ED "Loy-r EAeO.eOPS~� ., • GENOA/? ?i2Ef ,Qo✓t' r•'�� i = lz • �_' ,• ', .. ' : : .'> ' ' _ . � ,, .•WHA ? - ;SWOp #AAB.P/CAT'/4N - IC/ILO /DISTALLA T/ON U d yNER WAN TE D Reproduction courtesy of ;17 -_. _ `. A. H. Mathias & Co.