05/13/1975 - Packet -
Agenda
Tigard Site Development and Design Review Board
May 13, 1975 4:30 p.m.
Twality Junior High School Lecture Room
14650 SU 97th Avenue, Tigard, Oregon
I° CALL TO ORDER
2° ROLL CALL
3° APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Minutes of April 22, 1975
4° PROJECT REVIEW
4°1 SDR 8-75 (Harris Enterprises DBA Awful Brothers)
A request for review of the remodeling and site development of on
existing automotive service station on SU Pacific Highway at Park
St" (northwest corner) .
A. Site Development Plan Review
B. Architectural Design Review
"Wow 4. 2 SDR 10-75 (Snyder-Ryan Interstate Development Co. by Van Lom-
Kraxberger\
A request for review of one fifty duelling unit and one forty unit
apartment development on adjacent sites in the Englewood Planned
Development at SU Soholla Ferry Road and Springwood Drive (both
sides of Springwood Drive) . �
A. Site Development Plan Review
B. Architectural Design Review
4° 3 SOR 11-75 (Bob Hudson)
A request for review of an office building on a site located at
SU Pacific Highway and Walnut Place (southwest corner) .
A. Site Development Plan Review
B. Architectural Design Review
4°4 SDR 12-75 (Way Lee, by Alpha Engineering and others)
A request for review of two restaurants on adjacent sites to be
developed as o single project on SU Pacific Hy° at the proposed
south extension of SW 69th Ave. (south side of Pacific Huy east
of the High Hat Restaurant) . ^ °
A. Site Development Plan Review
B. Architectural Design Review
5. OTHER BUSINESS
Zoning ordinance amendments: discussion by staff
6. ADJOURNMENT
SDR Agenda - May 13, 1975 - page 2
TIGARD SITE DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
Staff Report
May 13, 1975
SDR 8-75 (Harris Enterprises dba Awful Brothers)
Item 4.1
Applicant
Design Forum for Harris Enterprises
Applicant's Proposal
to remodel an existing auto repair/service station for their
use as a discount gas station
Site Development Plan and Architectural Review
of a proposed major remodeling and site development on SW
Pacific Hwy. and Park St. (tax lot 1900, Wash. Co. tax map
2S1 2CB)
Staff Findings :
1. Site is approximately 11,760 sq. ft. with 150 ' of frontage on
SW Pacific Hwy. and 100' on SW Park.
2. Location on the site of the main structure and the pump islands
'Aw G;.le_ proposed to remain as existing. Changes are superficial
treatment of the building and construction of a new canopy over
the pump islands. Landscaping and modest site renovation are
planned.
3. Existing curb cuts on SW Pacific Hwy. are in excess of City standards
and are located poorly in relation to SW Park St. creating a hazard-
ous conflict.* The probability of a motorist attempting to avoid
the hazard area cutting diagonally across Park St. to enter the
station on the Park St. side is probably very good. This possible
maneuver is potentially more hazardous than entry from Pacific Hwy.
An amelioration of that problem would be possible by conformance
to City standards (30 ft. curb cuts located a minimum of 30 ft. from
any intersection and a minimum of 30 ft. from any other driveway
apron) . This City standard may be applied by the City to any street
within the City, regardless of street jurisdiction.
4. No curb, sidewalk or edge of pavement is shown on SW park St.
Access from the side of site has been unrestrained in the past, but
may not be allowed to continue.
5. The existing front pump island is poorly located with respect to in-
coming traffic flow from the north on Pacific Hwy. Staff sees little
opportunity for bettering this problem short of moving the existing
front pump island.
( between traffic entering Pacific Hwy. from Park St. and traffic
entering the station from SW Pacific Hwy. south bound)
6. No irrigation or way to provide . irrigation to the proposed land-
scaping is shown. Applicant must either provide an irrigation plan
or certification by a licensed nurseryman that the plant materials
are "drought resistant" .
7. Curbs should be provided around landscape areas to protect land-
scaping.
8. Storm drainage is not provided for on site. On-site catch basins
and effluent lanes should be shown and catch basins shown on Park
St. right-of-way should be relocated to the curb gutter.
9. Sight screening of parking and maneuvering areas to screen views
from the rear and side property lines may be required should the
Design Review Board deem it necessary.
10. The required front yard setback is not shown as landscaped on
Pacific Hwy. All areas not necessary parking, loading or
maneuvering areas are required to be landscaped per code.
11. Overhang of canopy must be 8' from property line.
Staff Recommendation
1. Curbs , sidewalks and driveway aprons be provided to conform with
City code on both street frontages.
2. Catch basins be provided in conformance with City Code.
3 . Curb, bumper rail or some similar protection be provided between
sidewalk on Pacific Hwy. and outermost service land or eliminate
outer service lane and landscape first 10 ' in conformance with
code.
14W
SDR staff report - May 13, 1975 - page 2 - item 4.1
Staff Report
Tigard Site Development and Design Review Board
May 13, 1975
Agenda Item 4.2
SDR 10-75 (Snyder-Interstate by Van Lom-Kraxberger)
Site Development and Architectural Design Review
of two designated multiple family development sites in an
approved Planned Development at SW Scholls Ferry Road and
SW Springwood Drive
Proposal
to build a 50 unit apartment development "Englewood Gardens" on
a 4.96 acre site and an adjoining 40 unit apartment development
(Englewood Too) (sic) on a 3.75 acre site
Staff Findings
1. Multiple family use of this parcel was approved in 1973 as a
portion of the Englewood Planned Development.
2. Several conditions of the P-D approval apply to both these
sites and to the streets adjacent to them. These conditions,
as extracted from exhibit "B" of Ordinance 73-17 are :
(1) That a program for development of the open space be
submitted. This program could phase open space de-
velopment with the construction phases of the project.
As each phase is completed, the open space to be
developed as part of that phase should be developed
prior to issuance of occupancy permits, unless security
equal to the cost of the improvements, as determined by
the Planning Director, is filed with the City assuring
such installation within six months after occupancy.
"Security" may consist of a faithful performance bond
payable to the City, cash, certified check or such other
assurance of completion approved by the City Attorney.
(3) That site development plans and the architectural design
of the multi-family dwellings shall be approved by the
Planning Commission prior to issuance of building permits,
to insure compatibility with the single family neighbor-
hood.
(4) That a landscaped earth berm be installed along 121st
Ave. and Scholls Ferry Rd. to help provide privacy for
dwellings adjoining said streets. Plans for the berms
and landscaping shall be approved by the Planning Dept.
and implemented prior to occupancy of affected dwellings.
(6) That 5 ft. be dedicated to the City along 121st Ave.
and 10 ft. along Scholls Ferry Rd. , to provide
adequate right-of-way width for future improvements.
(9) That deciduous shade trees be planted in the traffic
island planned in the center of Englewood Rd. between
S. W. Scholls Ferry Rd. and the southern terminus of
SW Dellwood Loop at SW Englewood Rd.
(10) That, in order to promote maximum public safety for
pedestrian and bicyclists, the applicant shall provide
a minimum three foot wide landscaped separation between
the proposed traffic way and sidewalks in the proposed
SW Englewood Rd. right-of-way. Additionally, the
applicant shall provide a minimum six foot wide meander-
ing landscaped pedestrian/bikeway along and separated
from the paved portion of SW Scholls Ferry Rd. This
facility and its landscaping shall be coordinated with
the landscaped berm recommended by the Planning Com-
mission. Plans for the berms, landscaping and pedestrian/
bikeway shall be approved by the Planning Department and
implemented prior to occupancy of any adjacent apartment
dwelling units.
All sidewalks and pedestrian/bikeways within the project
shall have a smooth transition with streets constructed
within the project. This is in order to facilitate the
movement of bicycles and wheel chairs throughout the
proposed development.
(11) That the areas designated for apartment development be
limited to a density of 11 units per gross acre.
(14) The developer will provide adequate right-of-way and
financing to accomplish left turn traffic movements
at the intersections of SW Scholls Ferry Rd. and SW
Englewood Dr. and at SW Englewood Dr. and SW 121st Ave .
3. The Chairman of the Planning Commission has authorized staff to
construe condition #3 to refer to the Design Review Board rather
than the Planning Commission in that the Design Review Board has
since been delegated the site development plan and architectural
design review authority held previously by the Planning Com-
mission. The Design Review Board, in this case, however, may
not interpret the conditions of the Council in approving the
Planned Development, but would have to return any exception
to those conditions to the Planning Commission for their
approval.
4. All conditions of the Planned Development approval appear to
have been met, with the exception of #10. The provision of
pedestrian ways and off-site landscaping appear to be the
responsibility of the overall developer. However, the language
of the previous approvals clearly prohibit occupancy of these
SDR staff report - 5/13/75 - page 2 - item 4.2
------------------------
projects until the stated improvements are made. Staff
assumes proper coordination between on-site and off-site
landscaping can be enforced by the City if that were to
become necessary. Specific performance of the applicant
to ensure his contact of and coordination with the overall
developer may be desirable .
5. Parking, access and setbacks appear to meet all pertinent code
provisions .
6. "Refuse disposal" locations shown appear to be inconveniently
located for some of the buildings. This can lead to alterna-
tives being sought by tenants such as a curb-side line up
of garbage cans on collection days.
7. Irrigation is not addressed in the submitted plans. The
architect has stated the applicant's intention is to provide
a sprinkler irrigation system.
8. The landscape plan for Englewood Gardens, as submitted, is
compatible with the approved Phase I general landscape plan
for the common areas of the Planned Development adjacent the
"Englewood Gardens" project. Pedestrian access to the Phase
I commons should be improved, however.
9. The overall developer (Commonwealth) has not yet submitted
a landscape plan for the Phase II commons adjacent Englewood
Too (sic) . Compatibility of this project with the overall
landscaping could not be determined.
10. As mentioned above (finding #4) , landscaping adjacent to SW
Scholls Ferry and SW Springwood appears to be the respon-
sibility of the overall developer.
11. Required site screening between multi-family and single family
development is not shown.
Staff Recommendations :
Approval subject to the following conditions :
1. All on and off-site landscaping, including screening
vegetation and street plantings will be installed and
inspected before occupancy.
2. Sprinkler irrigation to be provided throughout.
3. The applicant is to contact Commonwealth and coordinate
landscaping, plant materials, scheduling, pathways and
outdoor play areas in particular, with them on the
Englewood Too portion of the project, subject to staff
review.
SDR staff report - 5/13/75 - item 4.2 - page 3
N G L 1. ): W_ 0 0 D
,,.. S,I El.
A PLANNED RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENT gin?
BY... COMMONWEALTH PROPERTIES, INC.
.yo.. - L r-- -a '• ' ^�fNM'�►E,f VICINITY MA
CONCEPT `A!
\ \
SCALE 1"300, . ._ �'" iU� •,�,��
V ®�
4V� rl
.4M X05,14SON
14
PHCA_
co `.,
4pyo
y� --
_-- -� �'�i ',a•c��oTe wIi�TM.`c -T i' -LT � i T -•. �.� L�-. _ � - ---- --
�•� � ��I �,. � � ..,E,y e.• I T--t��__!�_.,-.!_-�•"����1s. i it ..
,
04
Ilk
PLANNING DATA
`r ''•'.• ,\ 1 � \ �, _ �y - 5 /
,.{I I=F ' �' I .` I �.M� - _._ _- __ .� \ - /1 i!'.. ,fit_-,-. �t�'",. �,,S,,,���� ,T'-,• c` ..,a� .x' `TAX LOTS 100,20,3 , 0Rpg
ftT00DESCRIPTIONqP.
i
1
ISI34A;TAX1075 600, 602, PORSOO,tSIS4Bw _ r„
OWNER/DRCOMMONWPROPERTIQ INC
6AAVE ISO S PORTLAND,OR
THE MURRAY-MCC
• j#1 f I i' .- _. - .,�f �O. F k�, ENGINEER/PLANNER' O
ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP
5319 SW CANYON COURT
fl (;! i. I _ •� �... PORTLAND. OREGON
EXISTING USE- UNDEVELOPED
'``�}'wn 1'"'—"' ""-1 - EXISTING ZONE S-R
1 `56+l00L 6 PARK P H E \ $ Q PROPOSED USE SINGLE AND MULTI FAMILY
R"' PLANNED RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENT
PROPOSED ZONE P-D
ISI ALL UTILITIES AND STREETS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED
TO CITY OF TIGARD STANDARDS
TOPOGRAPHY AERIAL SURVEY SEPT 1966 COMPILED
BY SPENCER B GROSS,PORTLA ND.OR
I '•� - - __ \ O I
WATER,TIGARD WATER DISTRICT
1�i i \_._.— � `• SANITARY SEWER U S A
LINEAL FEET OF STREET• ♦OFT RM!- 56OOLF
_ , i.__."., ---•---T-=—•--+--7---T--- .� SOFT R/W• 5900 LF
6 0 F T R/W pp2��6��0�50F
�L yy
f IYPE A lj? 33�,r�iec
SINGLE FAMILY ;
MULTI FAMILY 13 7 UO 1022 uf1shlG
COMMON GREENWAY I5 6 — —
'� SCHOOL 9 PARK 9 S -- --
fTOTAL 1000 36 0 3 60 urNsNa
Staff Report
Tigard Site Development and Design Review Board
May 13, 1975
Agenda Item 4.3
SDR 11-75 (Bob Hudson)
Site Development and Architectural Design Review Board
of a 2300 sq. ft. office building at 12900 SW Pacific Hwy. as the
first phase of a two-phase office development
Staff Findings
1. Site is approximately 21,000 sq. ft. with 119 ft. of frontage
on SW Pacific Hwy. and 175 ft. on SW Walnut Place.
2. All pertinent zoning code requirements appear to be met.
3. Improvements to and/or relocation of SW Walnut Place are an-
ticipated in the near future. At such time as that is accom-
plished, applicant should be called upon to bear a proportionate
responsibility for those improvements.
4. "Near" building lines on adjacent sites are not shown, thus
relationship of the proposed building to adjacent properties
is not evaluated.
5. An irrigation plan as required is not shown.
6. "Building Sign" shown appears to conform to Code requirements;
however, it could probably be improved by relocation back from
the property line.
7. Catch basins for on-site drainage are not shown.
8. "Future Storm Drain" must be subject to approvals of both planning
department and public works.
Staff Recommendation
APPROVAL subject to:
1. Applicants execute an agreement not to remonstrate against future
street improvements.
2. Driveway approach to be consistent with public works director ' s
approval pending future street improvements.
3. Area indicated as "Future Office Building" to be landscaped with
a minimum care ground cover until that phase is constructed.
4. Sprinkler irrigation to be provided by applicant,
Staff Report
Tigard Site Development and Design Review Board
May 13, 1975
Agenda Item 4.4
S�R 12-75 (Way Lee by Alpha [ng)
Site Development Plan & Architectural Design Review
4 request for review of two restaurants ("Coco' s"
and oPlenkhoueen) on adjacent sites at S.W. Pacific
Highway and 69th Avenue.
Staff Findings
l° This site has recently been the subject of o
subdivision action by the Tigard Planning
Commission.
2° The developers concept is to lease building
sites within a "commons" area of landscaped
parking and access.
3° Existing development around the site consists
of a restaurant /Hi—Hat on the west, o yet
undeveloped portion of the site slopes off to
a creek on the south, and another undeveloped
portion of the site on the east (adjacent
Coco ' s) extends to the P°G°E° oubetetion~ The
two undeveloped areas are tentatively programmed
for office commercial use with site development to be
handled in a similar fashion to the presently pro—
posed restaurants.
4. Parking areas generally conform to city standards,
excepting that inadequate back out space is provided
in several areas (North and East sides of nPlenkhouaaov
East aide of Coco' s) .
5. Aooeao from the public right—of—way to the sites
appears adequate, however standard driveway aprons
are required"
6. Access to the rear of Coco' s is not adequate,
either continuous driveways or turn around space
adequate for delivery ana emergency vehicles should
be provided. A possible solution could he cutting
an aooeoo through the first parking island south of
Coco's along the adjacent property line so that
two way oocooa to the parking area closest to
�
Cocos could be accomplished.
^ . ^
7° Pedestrian aooaoo through perking areas is not
provided, although such provisions are not
particularly required by Tigard code, the prob-
able future development of the adjacent sites
as well as the size of the proposed parking areas
would seem to justify provision of pedestrian
uaIhuaya within the project potentially connecting
to the adjacent future development sites.
B. Tigard coda requires 2 Poet of landscape screening on the
edges of a parking area and requires that perimeter
parking epooea be provided with wheel blocks 4 feet
from the property line. The perking area on the
East of Coco's does not conform to this requirement.
The applicant has stated that it is the developers
intent to provide landscaping, on the adjacent site.
9° Screening of "service yard" areas does not appear
adequate.
lO° No landscape treatment for the areas in the Pacific
Highway right-of-way is shown on the landscape
plan. Although this land is in the state right-
of-way it must still be the responsibility of the
ad (auent property owner to assure its adequate
landscaping and maintenance, just as is the parking
strip adjacent S.W. 69th.
1I^ Large hedge shown adjacent "Hi Hat" parking lot on
site plan is not shown on landscape plan--staff feels
there is an obligation to not interfere with the
landscape amenity provided the "Hi Hot" unless either
improvement or at least replacement is possible.
12~ Street landscaping on S.W. 69th does not appear to
conform to the planning commission ' s intent in
requiring a five foot sidewalk set book from the
street with "Street Trees" adjacent the street. The
planning commission definitely termed the area
between the sidewalk and curb a nporkingatripn and
intended that an appropriate landscaping treatment
be employed. Provision of adequate space for
underground utilities is a problem that staff
recognizes here--as well as the conflict between
some kinds of street trees and those utility lines;
however, the 50 foot right-of-way permitted for
S.W. 69th was allowed with the understanding that
the narrower right-of-way would allow better siting
and better mita development of the proposed restaurants.
A minimum 5 foot space for utilities has been requested
by the Department of Public Works--this could be in
the form of an easement on the applicant' s site or
it could be adjacent the street with the sidewalks
either wholly or partly on an easement.
-2-
Recommendations:Staff Approval subject to
l° Adequate backout clearance and maneuvering space
be provided those areas deficient.
2° An agreement and bond specifying that required
landscaping and oocaea along the east property
line of Coco' s will be provided within l year
or such time as in appropriate (Alternatively,
the city must require that the code be strictly
conformed with. )
3. Landscaping adjacent »Plankhouean site, between
Plonkhouna and Hi Hat he coordinated with Hi Hat
to provide adequate screening of Planhhouoe
service areas and Hi Hat' s parking. Retention
of as many existing trees as possible should be
encouraged.
4° Relocated sidewalk on eaoeamont and provide street
trees in parking strip with a suitable ground cover
beneath them.
5" Applicant coordinate landscaping of State right-of-
way with Highway department and provide assurance
of its installation and maintenance.
6° Pedestrian aooeoa to building from parking areas*
and to the areas of proposed future development be
rovidod by walkways and "pedestrian islands*
(walkways through parking gores at curb height) .
NNW
-3-