The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 04/10/1989 I TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an REGULAR MEETING AGENDA agenda item needs to sign on the appropriate BUSINESS AGENDA CATV sign-up sheet(s) . If no sheet is available, APRIL 10, 1989, 6:00 P.M. ask to be recognized by the Chair at the start TIGARD CIVIC CENTER of that agenda item. Visitor' s agenda items are 13125 SW HALL BLVD. asked to be to 2 minutes or less. Longer matters TIGARD, OREGON 97223 can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or City Administrator. 6:00 o STUDY SESSION o Pete Kolleas (Transportation Issue) (6:30 p.m. ) o Transportation 2000 (7:00 p.m. ) (7:30 1. BUSINESS MEETING: 1.1 Call To Order and Roll Call 1.2 Pledge of Allegiance 1.3 Call To Staff and Council For Non-Agenda Items 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA (2 Minutes or Less Per Issue, Please) 3. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 3.1 Approve Council Minutes: February 20, 27 and March 6, 1989 3.2 Receive and File: a. Council Calendar b. Review of Waste Haulers Annual Reports c. Report on Status of Traffic Study -- "Diamond" Area 3.3 Approve Final Order - Grabhorn (Centron) - SDR 88-25, MLP 88-16, and V 88-39 - Resolution No. 89- 3.4 Accept Mara Woods Subdivision - Resolution No. 89- 3.5 Approve Gutherie Slusarnko Associates (GSA) Contract Payment - Resolution No. 89- 4. Public Hearing - Appeal of Director's Interpretation - Use Classification of Laser - Techincal Instruments, Inc. o Public Hearing Opened o Declarations Or Challenges o Summation By Community Development Staff o Public Testimony: Proponents, Opponents, Cross Examination o Recommendation By Community Development Staff o Council Questions Or Comments o Public Hearing Closed o Consideration By Council 5. Authorize Preparation of Preliminary Engineer's Report for the Proposed PacTrust Local Improvement District - Resolution No. 89- o Community Development Staff o Public Comment • o Council Deliberation 6. Consideration of Parking Restrictions on S.W. 135th Avenue - Ordinance No. 89- o Community Development Staff 4(7 COUNCIL AGENDA - APRIL 10, 1989 - PAGE 1 7. Council Consideration - City Center Development: Ordinance Approving the Plan and Resolution Accepting the Report. Ordinance No. .89- and Resolution No. 89- .- o Community Development Staff 8. City Center Ballot Title - Resolution No. 89•--____ o Community Development Staff 9. NON-AGENDA ITEMS: From Council and Staff 10. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and current and pending litigation issues. 11. ADJOURNMENT cw/9140D C • COUNCIL AGENDA — APRIL 10, 1989 — PAGE 2 TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice 7-6887 BEAVERTON.OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising CITY OF TIGARD • ° 0 Tearsheet Notice App PO BOX 23397 0 1989 TIGARD, OR 97223 • • 0 Duplicate Affidavit ciT, •• 0,7 • • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )85. ELAINE PETROGEORGE being first duly sworn, depose and sayribitetSthmlfttegivertising Director, or his principal clerk, of the a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published at TIGARD in the aforesaid county and state;that the AGENDA FOR TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and consecutive in the following issues: APRIL 6. 1989 e./JA-e t-dri74-421-' Subscribed"and-swo o before me this APRIL 7, 1989 • -... • Qitary Public for Oregon • 9/20/92 My Commission Expires: AFFIDAVIT . ,„••-• --614 rT1=1,4'f.:(-'1\ e- " - r "To •:.`,-04••••,'4,2t•45-”,•?.,•Ite •••••;., I,' 3,dir ..C.T• • ."" "--"•-••-•4'• '1; 4' r' Pc, .• 4e 0 ,L14, 44=1 r 4,4Z ' "v s 4- 2VA-,,.'", •''"-• C• 'Al 1,4, •A " lf •4' ••••' 4C r.1,1-•; fN/-‘95`4' ' -4 • t4'0, . • 7,1 $ o wli,' f )1,,;+1tr .."-11 •0., -•,•• • ••.• • *-41 ." ' • • ' • -,•-; ; `X, „ "'" /•!,) `2' •e-;41, ' '; "'•.0 •-;;_.fr•'•,,j- • - e • , . . ' , • _ • ' ° - -,1 ; •4,1 -i:e 4•i‘ " - • 1- - • 1.77,::+1 , • • •. • - 14 • _ TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY Legal P.O.BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice 7-6878 BEAVERTON,OREGON 97075 Ar- Legal Notice Advertising • CITY OF TIGARD • 0 Tearsheet Notice PO BOX 23397 • TIGARD, OR 97223 • Duplicate Affidavit { • • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, aI. ss. ELAINE PETRworn, a tha_Advertising being first duly sworn, depose and say �nNl Director, or his principal clerk, of the • a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published at TIGARD in the af$ lcfluniv i state;that the a printed copyofwhich is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper forONF. successive and consecutive in the following issues: MARCH 30, 1989 • ( e % 104 86 Subscribagrind'sworn: efore me this MARCH 31, 1989 N ry Public for Oregon • My Commission Expires: 9/20/92 AFFIDAVIT �k`iv , q `'-;F¢ r &1.,,a 5 `r., �i q ., 3 [ kY' dy r 1 3 it.F n ` T "`' k'ci ,I a. Y. 1,: k P �f�;a�{��u� �.�$ "" �� ` "; a� ,..,.;.:17.4.,‘ ttrieVatW 1, "-'-4)'''--%1 1• .K..4 dellify.,xt,.;` -"'S y r-,,It _ ,.,'`r'f'a 7(`C}i •• ,�: ux l 1J11r r,1 .b Al- .1....n ti�i 7 N 1f I, ��q y K' 'i•.. ^Jt;; t �' .7-."-:..7,37,:42,-,:\�It '1 ',i7---'1' i' = ‘11 3"- Si 4* '• ��1 i r1` )1i if i { .1',_ ----,:,:.--.74,r.6,111--.. CC3 i �.. • �'7r,£�' 'Y } j T r J 1 C 15' ` T•t- f >o 2 1� 'il St Y; I 1 1,7,[ 1 1 S a 1} •tul ,t ,S 1 t 'ti rg t -TC�•e-. 1s _y... P ➢' + < -1...,-A,,---4 ,÷:-,!'' l,Al71,y{3 7, • It -i ie ➢ _„..:.2.,`,•,'_-,Y.-, v tNVQ "' CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING rIn the Matter of the Proposed Ordinal/ice No 89- 1am_ STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss City of Tigard ) I, the Cle 1kl.ec .e L 4 Wheal-tett being first duly sworn, on oath, depose and say: That I posted in the following public and conspicuous places, a copy of Ordinance Number(s) ' — I k_ which were adopted at the Council Meeting dated 1-411o10 copy(s) of said ordinance(s) bein �he�r�et�o attached and by reference made a part hereof, on the /t( day of � ' , 1984. C.Luheaf«-j _ 1. Tigard Civic Center, 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon. (_ n, t(t;yft 2. U.S. National Bank, Corner of Main and Scoffins, Tigard, Oregon wo:54i( 3. Safeway Store, Tigard Plaza, S.W. Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon 4. Albertson's Store, Corner of Pacific Hwy. (State Hwy. 99) and C. W ails S.W. Durham Road, Tigard, Oregon Subscribed and sworn to before me this /f �'C" day of , 19k?. Notary Public for Oregon �; •:, i; My Commission Expires: //- 6----?/ • C 3 . I TIGARD CITY C O UNC I L MEETING MINUTES - APRIL 10, 1989 - 6:30 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor Jerry Edwards; Councilors: Carolyn Eadon, Valerie Johnson, Joe Kasten, and John Schwartz; City Staff: Pat Reilly, City Administrator; Chuck Corrigan, Legal Counsel; Phil Grillo, Legal Counsel; Ed Murphy, Community Development Director; Liz Newton, Senior Planner; Catherine Wheatley, Deputy City Recorder; and Randy Wooley, City Engineer. 2. STUDY SESSION: a. Agenda Review: o City Administrator and Council reviewed agenda item topics: - Community Development Director briefly reviewed Agenda Item No. 4 - Public Hearing - Appeal Director's Interpretation-Use Classification of Laser - Technical Instruments, Inc. There was general discussion on the difference between manufacturing uses versus office uses. Also discussed was the possibility of changing the zoning; this property was adjacent to light industrial zones. - Agenda Item No. 5 (Authorize Preparation of Preliminary Engineer's Report for the Proposed PacTrust Local Improvement District) was discussed. Community Development Director, in response to a question by Councilor Eadon, noted if engineering work was done for the proposed PacTrust Local Improvement District, the City would be reimbursed whether or not the LID was formed. b. Presentation by Mr. Pete Kolleas: o Mr. Kolleas read his presentation from prepared text. Following are highlights of his remarks: - He reviewed his professional background, noting he had been a truck driver since 1947 and possessed a very impressive driving record without a chargeable accident. He has been a Tigard resident for the last 26 years. Mr. Kolleas worked on the project which provided for better signalization for entering and exiting Highway 99. He advised he also had been trained in fire schools, the handling of petroleum products, and hazardous materials (Haz-Mats). - He cited potential problems with transporting dangerous cargo in tanker trucks on Highway 99W. He alleged these trucks were exiting I-5 and then traveling on 99W to Highway 217. He advised that the grade on a portion of 99W as well as the number of traffic lights and heavy traffic presented a safety problem for trucks carrying flammable material. Page 1 - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 10, 1989 o He described what would happen if an incident such as a '— gasoline fire would occur. A loose cargo of petroleum would not be containable, controllable, or extinguishable. o He proposed rerouting of truck traffic to avoid the most potentially dangerous sections of Highway 99. Then, when it was necessary to travel on Highway 99, the trucks should be routed through in designated lanes (using signs). Also, Mr. Kolleas noted problems with trucks impeding traffic by traveling side by side down both lanes. o He noted the importance of handling hazardous materials in the correct manner. o He reported problems concerning emergency vehicles. He advised that in order to be heard fire trucks were sounding sirens and horns; this, in turn, subjects neighborhoods such as his to excessive noise. He said the use of a public roadway was not a right, but a privilege which must be done in a safe and courteous manner. Mr. Kolleas strongly urged the governing bodies and staffs of the fire district and surrounding communities to address safety issues. Council commented on the issues noted by Mr. Kolleas noting they agreed safety was a high priority. It was noted that Highway 99 was a State highway and regulations and restrictions of truck traffic must be mandated by them. Mr. Kolleas advised that the traffic volume and the speed of traffic on Gaarde Street has become a serious problem in the residential areas. He noted a growing number of people were taking short cuts through neighborhood areas which was creating problems for the residents. Mayor Edwards advised Mr. Kolleas that Council would review these issues. Mayor requested a copy of the text of Mr. Kolleas' comments for further study by Council. Mr. Kolleas left the meeting. c. Washington County Commission Chair, Bonnie Hays, updated Council on the Transportation 2000 project. She reviewed committee membership and project structure. She also reviewed the ongoing efforts through the Legislature and advised of issues which were being studied at this level. Transportation 2000 was an alliance of government and private sector business people who have forged a consensus on the metropolitan region's road, transit, and rail priorities. The goal of the Transportation 2000 Committee was to encourage an economy that can compete in the 21st century and maintain the quality of life that Oregonians enjoy. Livability and growth depend upon a solid transportation system that will serve the state and regional economies. Ms. Hays went through the Transportation 2000 legislative program, which consisted of eight points: Page 2 — COUNCIL MINUTES — April 10, 1989 1. Increase the state gasoline tax and equivalent weight-mile tax by two cents per gallon by January 1, 1991. 2. Increase the state's annual vehicle registration fee from $10 to $20 on January 1, 1990. 3. Enable counties to levy a local vehicle registration fee no greater than the state fee. 4. Extend the transit payroll tax to local governments (Senate Bill 476). 5. Establish a Regional Light Rail Construction Extension Fund to set requirements and name the projects eligible for state funding. The legislation does not appropriate monies this session (Senate Bill 475). 6. Provide routine transit capital match at approximately $8,000,000 per biennium. 7. One-cent cigarette tax increase dedicated to elderly and handicap transportation (House Bill 3209). 8. Referral of a constitutional amendment to allow local vehicle registration fees to be used for transit. Funds from this registration fee could only be used following approval in a statewide election on the constitutional amendment and in a second local election (Senate Joint Resolution 12). Chair Hays reviewed some of the more controversial issues, noting the payroll tax, if passed, would be phased in over five to ten years; implementation would begin next budget year. In response to a question by Councilor Schwartz, Chair Hays advised that the payroll tax revenues would be generated as follows: o 60 to 65 percent would come from the School District o 25 percent from private and non-profit organizations o 15 percent from city, county and state governments. She advised some intergovernmental agreements would become necessary. After discussion, Council consensus was to think about the legislative program until their meeting on April 17, 1989. At this time, they would discuss whether to endorse the proposal by the Transportation 2000 Committee. 3. PROCLAMATION - NATIONAL CONSUMERS WEER a. Mayor Edwards proclaimed the week of April 23, 1989 as National Consumers Week. Page 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 10, 1989 4. VISITORS' AGENDA a. Bibianne Scheckla, Secretary/Treasurer of the St. Vincent DePaul Organization for Tigard (participant of Neighborshare), requested assistance from(-CANCEL-)for purchase of a computer. Mayor noted the City contributed funds to the Neighborshare Program this budget year. After discussion, Council consensus was to request Ms. Scheckla to work with staff for presentation of her request to the Budget Committee. b. David Oringdulph, Century 21 Properties, Tualatin, Oregon, testified regarding Consent Agenda No. Item 3.3 (Approve Final Order - Grabhorn (Centron) - SDR 88-25, MLP 88-16, and V 88-39). He distributed a map which illustrated the location of his property relative to the property which was the subject of this agenda item. Mayor requested opinion from Legal Counsel concerning whether the Final Order, which was before Council at this meeting, could be altered by Council as a result of testimony by Mr. Oringdulph. Legal Counsel Corrigan responded the proposed resolution represented the summation of the Council decision reached after the public hearing on March 27. Council could receive Mr. Oringdulph's testimony, but they would not be able to change what has already been acted upon. Mr. Oringdulph said he was asking the Consent Agenda Item be removed from consideration for two weeks for further study. Mr. Oringdulph resumed his testimony saying he objected to the public east-west road. He said this requirement destroyed their property and they couldn't allow this to happen. He reviewed the history of their property noting they now have 11 buildable lots. He said they allowed the City to take the lower section of their property for a park. In addition, they were required to dedicate around 1,200 feet of public right-of-way including 700-feet of 60-foot right-of-way. Adding to the expense of development was the necessity for a bridge over Fanno Creek. According to Mr. Oringdulph, with the requirement of the east-west road, the property would have negligible worth. He testified this road was not on any City Plan; in fact, it was removed from the Comprehensive Plan during an update. Mr. Oringdulph advised of the following objections he had with construction of an east-west road: o Traffic would be encouraged to go through a residential area rather than traveling 400 feet farther to Scholls Ferry Road which was a major thoroughfare. o 130th and 135th Streets would be basically identical and would enter onto Scholls Ferry Road. By encouraging traffic to bypass (- Scholls Ferry Road, inevitably there would be a great deal of public conflict. Page 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 10, 1989 o The City park would not generate enough traffic to warrant construction of a public east-west road. o No parking area has been designed for the City park. o Brittany Square area could absorb some of the traffic increase generated by park usage. o There would be an increase in public liability and additional burden to the City to maintain and police a 1,300 street. o The Centron project would have their own recreational area negating some of the use needs for the City Park. o Dedication of additional property would remove developable land from the tax rolls. o No reason for building the road, other than for park usage, was established. Mr. Oringdulph requested Council to remove the Final Order from the Agenda to study the issue another two weeks. He said he believed his request had the support of Centron, Mr. Grabhorn, and others involved with these properties. Mayor Edwards reminded Mr. Oringdulph there had been a public hearing on this issue. The findings contained in the proposed resolution was approved by a 3-2 Council vote after the public hearing was closed. In order for the item to be removed from the Consent Agenda, Council must approve such action by motion. Councilor Johnson commented on Mr. Oringdulph's testimony at the public hearing held March 27, 1989, on this issue. She asked why he did not speak to the economic issue of the road requirement at the hearing. Mr. Oringdulph advised the road, at that time, was strictly east-west and did not enter his property. He learned from staff recently that the Council action which required the road to be undulating and was now aligned to cut through his property. He advised he testified at the public hearing, even though he has no connection or economic interest with Centron, because he did not feel the road was appropriate. Councilor Johnson recalled that it was in no small part due to Mr. Oringdulph's testimony concerning the "straight-shot" design of the east-west road, that Council made such a point of requiring the circuitous route. She asked the Community Development Director if the road alignment had completed within the last two weeks. Community Development Director responded a preliminary alignment had been designed. He noted the original concept was to have half of the dedication on Century 21 property and the other half on the property to the north. Mr. Oringdulph advised this road did not affect their property until the requirement of an undulating road was made. v9 00 5 - COUNCTT, MINUTES - Anril 10. 1989 Mayor thanked Mr. Oringdulph for his testimony. Note: Mayor Edwards asked during Consent Agenda consideration if there was any councilor who wished to make a motion calling for the removal of any item on the Consent Agenda (other than Item 3.5, which had been pulled at the request of staff). No motion was made to this effect. 5. CONSENT AGENDA: 5.1 Approve Council Minutes: February 20, 27, and March 6, 1989 5.2 Receive and File: a. Council Calendar b. Review of Waste Haulers Annual Reports c. Report on Status of Traffic Study - "Diamond" Area 5.3 Approve Final Order - Grabhorn (Centron) - SDR 88-25, MLP 88-16, and V 88-39 - Resolution No. 89-27 5.4 Accept Mara Woods Subdivision - Resolution No. 89-28 5.5 Approve Gutherie Slusarnko Associates (GSA) Contract Payment - Resolution No. 89- - Withdrawn Motion by Councilor Eadon, seconded by Council or Johnson, to approve the Consent Agenda with Item 3.5 withdrawn from consideration as requested by staff. The motion was approved by unanimous vote of Council present. (_ 6. PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL OF DIRECTOR'S INTERPRETATION - USE CLASSIFICATION OF LASER-TECHNICAL INSTRUMENTS, INC. a. Public hearing was opened. b. There were no declarations or challenges. c. Summation by Community Development Director: An appeal had been filed requesting the Council to overturn the Community Development Director's interpretation that the operations of Laser-Technical Instruments, Inc. would be considered "manufacturing of finished products" for purposes of determining zoning districts which would allow the use. The business combines commercial and industrial aspects of producing and marketing precision marking instruments. The appellant requested the business be found to be considered a commercial use. The appellant suggested that the "manufacturing of finished products" component of their business was subordinate to the other components which would also be conducted at this site. Other components would include: "business equipment sales and service," "research services," and "professional and administrative services." These use classifications were permitted uses in several commercial zoning districts. Laser-Technical Instruments submitted a letter dated January 31, 1989 providing details on the operating characteristics of their business and the appeal request dated March 14, 1989, providing additional information. (These documents have been filed with the Council packet material). - i ....T,kTn TT uTTT!VP'C - A,.,41 1 n_ 1 989 rte_ 1 Community Development Director recommended Council affirm the Director's Interpretation that the operation of Laser-Technical Instruments, Inc., constitutes an industrial use with associated commercial aspects subordinate to the "manufacturing of finished products" aspect of the business. d. Public Testimony: John E. Schwab, attorney for the appellant, testified that his client presently has an earnest money agreement for purchase of the property; he wanted to relocate his Lake Oswego business to Tigard (Address: 7580 SW Hunziker Road.) Mr. Schwab said they were appealing the Director's interpretation because they disagreed with the finding that the primary functir,n of the business was to manufacture finished products with ot'ier aspects of the business being subordinate. He advised that final assembly comprised only about 15 percent of the floor area of the current operation and only about one-third of all labor hours. He noted no noise or fumes would be created to impact surrounding areas. Mr. Schwab's testimony included the following points: o Property across the street was zoned light industrial. o Contended this situation was no different from the decision the Council made in 1986. At that time, the former Community Development Director interpreted the Code in a manner which would prevent Magno-Humphries from processing and distributing vitamin tablets in the Central Business i)istrict (CBD) zone. Council had decided that vitamin production was secondary to warehousing when deciding the use on the property; therefore, the business was allowed to operate in the CBD zone. o Assembly was incidental to the use of the property and would have virtually no impact on surrounding property owners. The predominant uses of the property would be the sales and service of the products, including a show room, and the research, development, and administrative functions that support sales. Mr. Schwab requested that Council find that Laser-Technical Instrument's business activity would better be described as "business equipment sales and services" which would allow for it to be a permitted use in the CP zone. Council discussion followed. In response to a question from Councilor Johnson, Mr. Schwab advised his client would prefer not to go through the Comprehensive Plan Amendment process He noted 41, the appeal process was the option they chose to address their issues. Page 7 - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 10, 1989 After discussion, Council consensus was the Director correctly r interpreted the manufacturing use; however, the surrounding area was developed as a light industrial zone and perhaps this property should be reviewed for rezoning. There was discussion on granting the appeal as requested by the applicant and stipulating a condition limiting the amount of floor space used for assembly work. Meanwhile, Council would place the issue on their work schedule for further study. Councilor Eadon advised she would prefer to change the zoning, but she could support granting the appeal, with conditions, so long as it was understood the zoning in the area would be reviewed. e. Motion by Councilor Schwartz, seconded by Councilor Johnson, to grant a conditional use for Technical Instruments to use the property at 7580 SW Hunziker Road for their business use with the condition that no more than 15 percent of floor space could be utilized for assembly work. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. Council consensus was for staff to review the area for possible rezoning. 7. AUTHORIZE PREPARATION OF PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED PACTRUST LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT: a. Community Development Director advised this issue was before Council at their March 27, 1989 meeting; Council consensus was to postpone consideration until April 10, 1989 to allow the property owners an opportunity to present their concerns to Council. Community Development Director advised that once the Engineer's Report was completed, there would be two more formal steps, including a public hearing, before formation of an LID could occur. b. Community Development Director advised that PacTrust has agreed to reimburse the City for staff time and any cost associated with the project. c. Public Comment: o John E. Smets, 6830 SW Bonita Road, introduced members of his family and employees of Smetco. He advised Smetco had been in Tigard since 1973. (The text of Mr. Smets' testimony has been filed with Council packet material.) Page 8 — COUNCIL MINUTES — April 10, 1989 Mr. Smets advised PacTrust verbally offered to purchase his rentire property or exchange it for another property, but at a price so low it would be impossible for them to move their business and duplicate the convenience they now have. He advised his business was in an easy-to-find, safe, and accessible location and was also close to suppliers. He further noted his business was steadily growing and he planned for future expansion. He said the proposed 60 to 80 foot right-of-way would deprive him of land needed for his business's growth; he purchased the property for the purpose of expansion. Evenutally, Smetco planned to employ about 70 people. o Steven Pfeiffer, attorney representing PacTrust, agreed with staff's recommendation to proceed with the preliminary engineering report. He noted many of the concerns regarding the feasibility of developing the LID would be answered during the preliminary engineering work. He said failure to act tonight would cloud the issue. d. Council discussion: o Councilor Eadon advised she thought it appropriate for the information gathering process be initiated and was in favor of adopting the proposed resolution calling for the preliminary engineering study. Co Councilor Johnson agreed with Councilor Eadon's comments, but felt every opportunity should be given so this issue could be resolved privately. She said she would favor delaying a decision on the resolution for two weeks to allow the two parties more time for negotiation. o Councilor Schwartz noted he was supportive of long-time residents and business owners in Tigard, but was also supportive of corporations such as PacTrust, whose developments benefit all within the Tigard area. He noted he would like to see a "Win/Win" situation and agreed with Councilor Johnson that a two-week postponement may be a way to gain this. o Councilor Kasten noted the results of the preliminary engineering report would clarify some issues. He agreed that the public forum should not be the arena in which disagreements of this kind were resolved; he endorsed Councilor Johnson's suggestion for the postponement of a decision on the resolution for two weeks. o Mayor Edwards advised, after reviewing the facts and keeping the emotional factors aside, he supported proceeding with the preliminary engineering report. He did not believe an additional two weeks would make a difference in resolving the issues between the two parties. He noted he did not believe proceeding with the engineering study would preempt a fair hearing. 4 e. RESOLUTION NO. 89-29 A RESOLUTION DIRECTING STAFF TO HAVE PREPARED A PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT REGARDING THE FEASIBILITY OF PROVIDING STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS THROUGH THE FORMATION OF A LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT IN THE AREA OF THE PROPOSED PACTRUST DEVELOPMENT. 1 Motion By Councilor Eadon, seconded by Mayor Edwards, to approve F4 Resolution No. 89-29. The motion was defeated by a vote of 2-3; Councilors Johnson, Kasten, and Schwartz voted "Nay." f. Discussion followed. Motion by Councilor Schwartz, seconded by Councilor Johnson, to continue consideration of Resolution No. 89-29 to the April 24, 1989 meeting as a Consent Agenda Item. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. (Council meeting recessed at 9:05 pm; Council meeting reconvened at 9:15 pm.) 8. CONSIDERATION OF PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON SW 135TH AVENUE a. Summation by Community Development Director: On March 27, 1989, the Council heard testimony regarding the need for parking restrictions along SW 135th Avenue. After hearing the testimony, Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance that would prohibit parking on both sides of 135th Avenue, between Scholls Ferry Road and Morning Hill Drive. The Council further directed the parking restriction should be effected on May 1, 1989. Enclosed with the Council packet was a proposed ordinance which would formally adopt the parking restrictions as directed by the Council. b. ORDINANCE NO. 89-12. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TMC 10.28.130, PROHIBITING PARKING ON THE PORTION OF SW 135TH AVENUE, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. c. Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Schwartz, to adopt Ordinance No. 89-12: The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. 9. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION - CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT: ORDINANCE FOR APPROVING THE PLAN AND RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE REPORT a. Senior Planner Newton reviewed and highlighted the past history of the City Center development which resulted in the proposed plan and report as presented to Council in their packet. She also noted some changes which were being suggested for clarification and in response to concerns raised by members of Council and citizens. She reviewed the following documents distributed to Council: 1. City Center Development Plan and Report -- Proposed Revisions 2. City Center Development Plan and Report -- Proposed Additions. 3. City Center Development Plan and Report -- Proposed Deletions. Page 10 - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 10, 1989 Community Director noted that the changes were the result of suggestions made by legal counsel. Community Director advised staff's recommendation remained unchanged; that is, adoption of the Plan and acceptance of the Report with the changes noted in Documents in 1 and 2 above. b. Council Comments: Councilor Johnson reviewed the City Center Development Plan process over the last two years. She noted it appeared unlikely for the Tigard City Center to be able to draw new business or encourage expansion of business until some major improvements were made to the infrastructure. She advised the success of downtown development would mean a vital city center area which would help offset property taxes for all the citizens in Tigard. Councilor Johnson reviewed tax increment financing, noting this would not mean an automatic large sum of money for Council to spend in an unplanned fashion. She advised Council's most important responsibility was, and would remain, to provide services to the citizens of Tigard. She advised she also felt the Council had the broad responsibility to review policy issues which would keep the community vital. Councilor Johnson noted that language changes suggested by staff made a better Development Plan. She said there has been concern expressed by numerous people that there has not been enough explanation of the procedures for the development of the downtown. She suggested postponement of the decision to forward the Development Plan issue to the voters from the May election to the November election to allow additional time for public education on the issues. This way, the educational process could be completed in a more thorough fashion. Also, during this expanded timeframe, the land use and development code issues, which were outside of the study to date, could be addressed. Councilor Schwartz agreed with Councilor Johnson. He advised that downtown Tigard has remained almost unchanged for 20 years; an inactive downtown area costs Tigard citizens money. He noted this expense would continue if the downtown area was not revitalized. He further advised that it was the City's intent to assist downtown businesses to expand. Councilor Schwartz advised he felt it would be important to postpone the issue to the November election to allow more time for meetings and workshops to address concerns in the community. Mayor Edwards referred to Councilor Johnson's comments and reiterated that the delay was for education purposes. He advised that throughout the hearings on the issue, concerns were continuously noted. Council would use the additional time to attempt to resolve those concerns. By the time the issue was referred to the voters, the Mayor hoped there would be a better understanding of the tax increment financing feature of the proposal and what the Downtown Development Plan would accomplish. Page 11 - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 10, 1989 c. Lengthy discussion followed on consensus for wording of a motion for Council consideration; the result of this discussion was: Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Kasten, to receive the Development Plan, Report, and documents prepared by staff (Proposed Revisions, Proposed Additions, and Proposed Deletions); Council intent would be to place a final Development Plan on the November 1989 ballot. The motion was approved by unanimous vote of Council present. Discussion followed. Community Development Director asked for clarification and direction to staff. Council consensus was that the above action was simply receiving all the documents presented at this meeting; the Development Plan should not be altered to reflect any of the changes which were in the three documents presented by staff. Council consensus was to direct staff to prepare a timeline/work program for Council review on land use and Development Code policies for the city center area. 10. CITY CENTER BALLOT TITLE - Cancelled 11. NON-AGENDA ITEMS There were none. 12. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council went into Exec”tIve Session at 9:58 p.m., under the provision of ORS 192.660(1)(d)(e)(n), to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, and current and pending litigation issues. 13. ADJOURNMENT: 11:00 P.M. Approved by the Tigard City Council on `I Cblj , 1989. (1.049 ( Deputy Recorder - C ty of T and ATTEST: I !/i4 /// 'ayor - City of Tigard cw/9618D dr Page 12 - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 10, 1989 APRIL 1989 1 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDA`! FRIDAY tl SATURDAY 9:OOAM "MEET THE MAYOR" - LIBRARY APRIL I FOOLS DAY 2 3 _5J I 21 6:30PM COUNCIL 7:30PM PLANNING 7:30PM NPO #1 - MEETING WITH COMM. - TH THCR KING CITY COUNCIL - ELMERS 7:30PM NPO #4 - RESTAURANT CDCR 9 10 111 121 13 141 151 . 6:30PM COUNCIL 2:30PM CIVIL 7:00PM LIBRARY 7:00PM LAND USE STUDY AGENDA -• INFR. H.O. - TH BOARD - THCR H.O. - TH THCR 7:00PM TRANSP. 7:30PM COUNCIL ADVISORY COM. - BUSINESS MTG - CDCR TH 16 17 18 7:30AM ECON. —171 20 r 211 22 . DEVELOPMENT- 6:30PM COUNCIL RESTAURANT 7:00AM YMCA - TH STUDY MEETING - THCR 7:00PM UTILITY & 7:30PM NPO #7 - FRAN. - THCR THCR " 7:30PM PLAMQING COMM. - TH 7:30PM PRK BOARD - CDCR • . 23 27 251 26 27 28, 29 6:30PM COUNCIL 7:00PM BUDGET 7:00PM LAND USE STUDY SESSION - COMMITTEE - THCR H.O. - TH THCR 7TYPM COUNCIL BUS. MTG - TH ke/OO1CR r TH - Town Hall * Department Head Staff Meeting: 8:30 - 10:30AM (THCR) THCR - Town Hall Conference Room Second Tuesday - Attorney Trials: 9AM - 12:30PM Cal & THCR) CDCR - Community Development Conference Rocm i Everynesday - Municipal Court: 2:30 - 7PM (TH & THCR CSCR - Community Services Conference Room . .'-, Every rsday - Municipal Court: 12:30 - 5PM (TH & THCR ") MOD - Modular • • AGENDA LTEM # HA2 — VISITOR'S AGENDA DATE 4/10189 I (Limited to 2 minutes or less, please) Please sign on the appropriate sheet for listed agenda items. The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. Please contact the City Administrator prior to the start of the meeting. Thank you. NAME & ADDRESS TOPIC STAFF CONTACTED p(, ,B4O9ti,UE L . En/a— /� o-2 , • • C DATE 4/10/89 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print the information) Item Description: AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 - PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL OF DIREGTORIS .INTERPRETATION - USE CLASSIFICATION OF LASER - TECHNICAL INSTRUMENTS INC. ************************************* ***************************************** Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue) ************************************* ***************************************** Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation 1-61441 Es SCWA14,10 Fco Poitut'c O 17Y 4 JJ1 C DATE 4/10/89 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print the information) C Item Description: ;:, AGENDA ITEM NO. .5 — AUTHORIZE PREPARATION OF PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED PACTRUST LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ******************************************************************************* Proponent (For Issue) Opponent (Against Issue) ******************************************************************************* Name, Address and Affiliation lam:: Address and Affiliation JO�� s. SWI \S---2 �j0 S�+UU gc71�1 u��y�, M1P1(Ltti=t- 1>. 1/11=r O 7W �01\TOS auJ�✓r�✓L�aa►JReq T 5��,s s„J i00 .1\ RD .uti 1.4614. Mas. arR 6 B "It Su...) 60NstA 29 Pavy . 5.J elsyk f D6s/Si1�e� sS •` J-1. h /� /�,t PRoTiter JI A.It t �• Ny- t ocRrlrO .cT f- r ,g• Iravirr• ik+ LUI+t itry'L _ h N lit ✓1 N N . 5)-tkcLid assi<rn 1-4 if /S MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Honorable Mayor & City Council April 12, 1989 ftFROM: Cathy Wheatley, Deputy Recorder SUBJECT: Mr. Pete Kolleas' Presentation on 4/10/89 As was requested at the Council meeting of April 10, 1989, attached is a copy of the text of Mr. Kolleas' presentation at the meeting. ow c • 1 MAYOR-COUNCIL MEMBER I APPRECIATE YOUR TIME AND INTEREST OF WHAT I WILL SPEAK ABOUT TQNITE, I HAVE VERY FIRM CONVICTIONS WITH CRITIZISM c CONCERNING TIGARD NOT HANDLING THE PROBLEM WITH PUBLIC SAFETY IN THE AREA OF HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION, I AM ALSO A PERSON WHOM IS A STRONG BELIEVER THAT I MUST INCORPORATE A KNOWLEDGEABLE , SOLVABLE, WITH A REASONABLE SOLUTION TO THESE PROBLEMS. I WILL GIVE YOU A BACKGROUND OF MYSELF I WAS A PROFESSIONAL TRUCK DRIVER DATING BACK TO 1947, I HOLD A VERY IMPRESSIVE DRIVING RECORD FROM THE TRUCKS AND AUTOMOBILE WITH OUT AN CHARGEABLE ACCIDENT IN THIS TIME FRAME . AND WHY THRU THE 26 YEARS I HAVE RESIDED IN TIGARD HAVE SPOKEN OUT ABOUT ISSUES THAT ARE BEING OVERLOOKED THAT ARE ASSOCIATED WITH MY DEEP CONCERN ON THE SUBJECT OF SAFETY. IN THE LATE 1970s I WAS APPOINTED TO THE COMMITTEE ON THE PROJECT IN TIGARD THAT UNDERTOOK FOR BETTER SIGNALIZATION THAT WAS RESIDENT ORIENTED TO MAKING IT EASIER AND SAFER TO ENTER AND EXIT 99W ALSO THE SIGNALIZATION FOR LEFT TURN LANES,ONE MILLION OF DEFUNCT MT. HOOD A LUCY SARLES AND I APPEARED BEFORE THE WASH. CO . BRD. OF COMM. AND REQUESTED TWENTY 'THOUSAND DOLLARS WHICH WAS GRANTED FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE WASH. CO. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMM. THIS IN THE MID 1970s, SOME OF THE RESIDUAL PROJECTS YOU SEE TODAY ARE R.R. WARNING GATES, LOCALLY AND CO. WIDE, SCHOOL SAFETY FOR WALKING CHILDREN, ITS EFFORTS BROUGHT MANY NATIONAL AWARDS TO WASH. CO. I HAVE SPENT IN EXCESS OF THREE MONTHS IN FIRE SCHOOLS IN THE HANDLING OF PETROLEUM PRODUCTS AND HAZ-MATS,I WAS VERY FLUENT IN THE FED. GOV. D.O.T. BOOK ON THE ABOVE SUBJECTS. ( WAS ALSO A CHARTER INSTRUCTOR OF THE FIRST HAZ-MAT TEAM AS YOU SEE '?HEM TODAY BACK WHEN WILLAMETTE TUG AND BARGE PUT THE FIRST TEEM TOG'' THEY ACOMPANIED ME NUMEROUS TIMES IN THE PROPER METHODS OF HANDLING -r II OF PETROLEUM PRODUCTS ON INLAND WATERWAYS, I PRIDE MYSELF IN OVER 30 YEARS (-1-.N THE PETROLEUM INDUSTRY WITHOUT A SPILLED PRODUCT. NOW TO MY CONCRNS ABOUT TIGARD, THAT BEING THE TRANPORTING OF DANGEROUS CARGOS WITH OUT ANY CONTROLS AS THEY PASS THRU TIGARD. TO MAKE YOU COGNIZANT OF THE MAGNITUDE OF THESE PROBLEMS WITH THIER IMMENSE SIZE, WHEN YOU SEE A TANKER WITH THREE AXLES TRUCK PULLING A FOUR AXLE TRAILER IT IS LEGALLY TRANSPORTING 11 ,400 GAL. WITH A COMBINED WEIGHT OF 102,000 # AND A LENGH OF 75 FT. THE EXISTING PROBLEMS WITH THESE AND CARGOS OF HAZ-MAT SUCH AS ACIDS, CAUSTICS IS AS YOU APPROACH TIGARD ON 1-5 FROM A POINT SOUTH OF THE CAPI- TAL HWY OVERPASS WHERE I-5 COMMENCES ITS DESCENT THEN ONTO 99W AND ITS ENSUING DOWN GRADE TO BELOW THE THEATRE LITE IS A DISTANCE OF 1 .6 MILES (- JVITH A 4-6% GRADE, THIS COUPLED WITH FOUR LITES AND STIFLING TRAFFIC . TRUCKS DO NOT LOSE THIER BRAKES PERSAY, WHEN AIR PRESSURE DROPS BELOW 60# TRIPLE VALVES AUCPOMATICALLY SET THE BRAKES INTO EMERGENCY, THEN EVEN AN APPLICATION OF 120# OF AIR WONT STOP ARIG, THIS BEING CAUSED BY THE DRUMS EXPANDING BY HEAT TILL THE SHOES WONT CONTACT THE DRUMS. WHY THE INCREASED TRAFFIC OF HA2-MATS CARGOS, WITH CONCERNS THE CITY OF PORTLAND AND THE DEPT. OF TRANS NAVE BANNED THF USE OR THE TUNNEL ON HWY. 26 TO TRUCKS WITH FLAMMABL , EXPLOSIVES,HAZ-MATS, THIS THEN MAKING THE LOGICAL ROUTE DOWN I-5 ONT0!99W TO HWY 217 THEN BEAVERTON, HILLSBORO. OR BACK ONTO HWY 26 TO THE COAST, BY THE CONTINUED USE OF 99W YOU MUST VISUALIZE THE POTENTIAL OF THE WORST CASE SCENARIO EITHER BY A TRUCKS (MECHANICAL FAILURES, OR ANOTHER IRRESPONSIBLE DRIVER LIKELY IN AN WTO. • III YOU NEVER WANT THIS CITY INVOLVED OR YOU TO SEE A PETROLEUM FIRE, I HAVE THREE TIMES,BUT BEING INVOLVED EARLY THE CONDITIONS WERE OPPORTUNE k 2OR ITS IMMEDIATE SUPPRESSION4 I HAVE LOST THREE FRIENDS TO TANKER FIRES (f LOCALLY, HERE ARE SOME FACTS, IS THAT RIG INVOLVED COMPARTMANIZED OR JUST ONE TANK, THIS WILL BE A MAJOR FACTOR IN THE INTENSITY OF THE ACCIDENT ALL I41NICIPAL FIRE DEPTS INCLUDING PORTLAND FIRE ARE NOT FULLY EQUIPED FOR THESE FIRES, WE AS TANKERMEN FEAR MOST ARE FIRE DEPTS, THEY ARE NOT VERSED IN THE OPERATIONS OF ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS, PLUMBING, OR THE OPERATION R UNrv48iN OF OUR LOADING SYSTEMS, THEY HAVE REPEATLY CALLED ON THE AIRPORTER FOR CONTAINMENT, SUPPRESSION, IT BEING A SELF CONTAINED, ENCLOSED VEHICLE . TO PUT IT INTO PERSPECTIVE FOR YOUR THOUGHTS 1-CUP (8oz0 OF GASOLINE VAPORIZED IS EQUIVELANT TO 16 STICKS OF DYNAMITE, THE TREMENDOUS IMPACT A LOOSE CARGO OF PETROLEUM WOULD UNLEASH UPON TISARD WOULD NOT BE CONT= AINABLE, CONTOLABLE, OR EXTINQUISHABLE, PLEASE NOTE AN UNCONTROLLED LIQUID OR LIQUID FIRE DOWN THIS GRADE WOULD HAVE A SPEED IN ACCESS OF 8FT. PER SECOND APPR. 500 FT. PER MIN. OR 1/5 MILE EVERY TWO MIN. AND THE FARTHER IT TRAVELS BEFORE IGNITION THE GREATER THE DESTRUCTION, IT IS NOT THE FLUID GASOLINE THAT IS EXPLOSIVE, BUT THE VAPORS GENERATED IN A SEWER SYSTEM WOULD BE DEVASTATING, A CASE IN POINT, IN PORTLAND A TRUCK OVERFILLED A TANK BY 150GAL. AND TRAVELLED INTO THE SEWERS, IT VAPORED FOR THREE BLOCKS EEFORE IGNITION THE RESULTS WERE THE OVER. 50# SEWER LIDS BECAME SPACE VEHICLES, TIO TOTAL DAMAGE WAS IN EXCESS OF ONE MILLION DOLLARS, WITH NO LOST LIVES. C IVi WHEN A CITY HAS NO CONTROL BY ReGULATION, THE RESULTS WILL BE EQUIVELANT TO THE EXPLOSION WITH THE RESULTING DEATH AND DESRUCTION THAT BEFELL ROSEBURG IN AUG,i 1959, A,DYNAMITE LADEN TRUCK PARKED IN THE CITY CENTER NEXT TO A LUMBER YARD THAT CAUGHT FIRE . I PROPOSE THE ALTERNATIVE TO THIS NOT HAPPENING IS FOR ALL TRUCKS TO . PROCEED DOWN I-5 TO THE HWY. 217 EXIT THEN ITS USE TO BEAVERTON, HILLSBORO OR ONTO THE COAST,THE RIGS GOING/SOUH OF TIGARD ON 99W TO REENTER AT HERE THE G.M. SCHOOL LITE, IS SUFFICENT ROOM AT THIS INTERSECTION TO MAKE TWO LEFT TURN LANES SOUTHBOUND ONTO 99W, AND THE CITY MUST GET CONTROL ON ALL PORTIONS OF 99W BY SIGNS OR VERBAL WARNINGS THAT ALL TRUCKS MUST STAY IN THE RIGHT HAND LANE, AS OF NOW THIS CITY IS MESS WITH TRUCKS IMPEDEING TRAFFIC RUNNING SIDEBY SIDE, ALSO THESE RIGS MUST USE THIS ROUTE IN THE REVERSE DIRECTION, I THINK WE ALL REALIZE THAT A ( VISIBLE TANKER DENOTES A POTENTIAL HAZARD, BUT WHAT ABOUT THE FREIGHT BOX WITH A 12IN. PLACARD DISPLAYED WHO REALLY GIVES ITS CARGO A THOUGHT. PLEASE REALIZE THAT THOSE EMPTY TANKERS ARE MORE EXPLOSIVE EMPTY WHEN THEY ARE RETURNING WITH THE VAPORS THEY HAVE RECOVERED FROM THEIR UNLOADING, THESE VAPORS ARE BEING RETURNED TO BE DISTILLED AND CONDENSATED BACK TO GASOLONE THRU A VAPOR RECOVERY SYSTEM. MANY CITIES AND SOME COMPANIES HAVE LAWS AND REGULATIONS THAT DURING THE UNLOADING PROCESS THE DRIVER MUST REMAIN IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA OF THE UNLOADING, NO FURTHER THAN THE LONGEST HOSE (20ft. ) . PEOPLE RUN OVER HOSES, DO SOME DUMB THINGS, APPROACH SMOKING, IT SHOULD BE NO OPERATOR SHALL RETURN TO THE CAB UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, BE IT WEATHER, BOOK WORK, 6k. IF THIS ACTION TAKES PLACE ALL SYSTEMS MUST BE SHUT DOWN TO NEGATIVE FLOW C CHIS IS A MUST IN TIGARD BECAUSE OF THE STEEPNESS OF THE TERRAIN INTO THE DIRECTION OF CITY CENTER, IT IS FOLLOWING THE NATURAL FALL OF WATER WITH NO DIVERSIONS TOWARDS FANNO CREEK. • V ANOTHER SITUATION AND VERY PREVELANT AND MOST ANNOYING IS AS THE FIRE • -DEPT. RESPONDS TO CALLS THEY ARE HAMPERED WITH THE PROBLEM OF BEING NOTI- CED OR HEARD, YOU MUST KNOW BEAVERTON HAS AN ORDINANCE BANNING THE USE BY WEARING OF EAR PHONES OR PLUGS FOR USE ON ANY PUBLIC MAINTAINED THOROUFARE USED AS SUCH, THIS CITY IS A MESS WTH RUNNERS, BIKES, WALKERS, PERSONS OPERATING VEHICLES, THIS GOES THRU TWO SPECTRUMS, WHY SHOULD I BE SUBJECTED WHERE I RESIDE TO BE HEAVILY IMPACTED BY THE NOISE THESE FIRE RIGS MUST PRODUCE WITH SIRENS,THE ADDED AIR HORN ALSO GOING AT MAXI- MUM TRYING FOR THE RIGHT OF WAY, YOU WOULD THINK YOU ARE RIDING ON THE HOOD ORNAMENT, NOISE IS THE WORST KIND OF POLLUTION, THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE HERE IS THE DELAY TIME FOR A POTENTIAL FIRE RESCUE, IT COULD BE MY LIFE, OR YOURS, A MEMBER OF YOUR FAMILY, YOUR NEIGHBOR, A BEST FRIEND. IT IS NOT A RIGHT EXTENDED TO YOU FOR THE USE OF A PUBLIC ROADWAY, BUT A. PRIVILEGE EXTENDED FOR ITS USE IN A SAFE AND COURTEOUS MANNER. C I MAKE AN ISSUE BY THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT THAT TIGARD PERHAPS UNTIL NOW AND THIS INCLUDES THE FIRE DISTRICT, HAVE BEEN LAX TO THE POINT OF DEREL- ICTION OF DUTY TO THE TAX PAYING PUBLIC, WHAT I AM PRESENTING TODAY SHOULD NEVER HAD TO BEEN BROUGHT FORTH BY A CITIZEN BUT IMPLEMENTED BY A SAFETY CONCIOUS AND ALERT STAFFES, YET IT IS A PROVEN FACT THERE HAS BEEN TREMENDOUS AMOUNTS OF MONEY SPENT ON FACILITIES BY THE FIRE DEPT. ON WAYS TO COMBAT THIS PROBLEM AFTER IT BECOMES A CRISIS, WHERE IS THE PREVENTION, THE PRIORITIES ARE NOT IN THEIRIGHT SEQUENCE, THESE SAME FACILITIES FOR THAT TRAINING IN LOADING AD UNLOADING FIRE FIGHTING ARE PASSE. I KNOW CF MANY CITIES THAT HAT FIRE ROUTES THAT EXIST WITH HILLY ERRAIN FOR THE AFORE MENTIONED COMMODITIES VI I AM NOT TRYING TO PUT INTO OPERATION A SYSTEM THAT HAS NOT BEEN IMPLEME- . _ (rr'ED SOMEWHERES ELSE BEFORE, I HOPE THIS COUNCIL WILL PERSONALLY TAKE AGGRESSIVE ACTION ON THIS SADLY LAOKING PROBLEM. THOSE PERSONS RESPONSIBLE IN HOUSE SHOULD BE ABLE TO COMPREHEND THRU THEIR JOB DESCRIPTION TO THE FACT THAT SAFETY IS ONLY ACCOMPLISHED BY "NO ACCIDENT" . I BELIEVE IN PROGRESS, BUT PUT IT IN THIS LIGHT, THAT IF YOU BELIEVE THAT ANNEXATION IS GOOD FOR ALL, THEN HISTORY WILL REPEAT ITSELF IN TIGARD THAT THE RUSH TO EX&ANSIONISM HAS LOST GREAT WARS, THRU THE INABILITY TO OVERCOME ITS PROBLEMS THAT CONCERN PEOPLE WHOM WILL SUFFER THE CONSEQUENCES THRU THE FORFIETURE OF THEIR SAFETY. YOU MUST MONITOR ALL FACETS OF SAFETY NO MATTER IF FOR A PERIOD OF TIME SAFETY WILL BECOME A DETERRANT TO PROGRESS . C GAARDE ST. HAS A 1991 DATE TO ALLEVIATE THE PROBLEM OF THE ACCESSABILITY ONTO 99W THIS HAS BEEN AN ISSUE FOR YEARS, PREVIOUS TO EIIVIERS BEING BUILT THE LINE UP OF GAARDE AND MCDONALD-WOULD HAVE BEEN THE DECISION (- ",- ..)UT PREVIOUS COUNCILS HAD SOME SICK IDEAS ABOUT THIS ISSUE IT HAS CREATED A MONSTER TWO FOLD, AND THE CITY STILL PERPETUATES THEM. WE DO NOT NEED ANYMORE SURVEYS OR STUDIES, THOSE PAST SPENT FUNDS WOULD HAVE ACCOMPLISHED THIS PROJECT, IN THE TIME FRAME OF THE LATEST DETERM- INATION I COULD HAVE TAKEN A SHOVEL AND WHEELBARROW AND REBUILT IT AND POURED THE CONCRETE CURBS WITH SACK CEMENT. THE CITIES INABILITY THRU YEARS OF LONG DELAYS HAS CAUSED OUR NEIGHBOR- HOOD TO .EXPERIENCE A HUGE INFLUX OF TRAFFIC OFF GAARDE ONTO 110th THEN PARK ST. AS A SHORT CUT, 998-JUNE 847-JULY 893-AUG. PER DAY, WE HAVE PEOPLE THROWING OBJECTS, EXCHANGING WORDS, ACCIDENTS, MY NEIGHBORS REQUEST THAT AS THE CITY WILL NOT TAKE THIS AS A GRAVE SITUATION BUT FIND EXCUSES TO DELAY THIS PROJECT, WITH HAYING BEEN A PROBLEM LONG BEFORE CANTRBURY LANE, SUMMERFIELD, PICKS LANDING, THE HIGH SCHOOL BEING BUILT, WE ARE POSITIVE THIS PROJECT COULD AND SHOULD BE FURTHER UP ON YOUR PRIOTITIES, THEN TAKE THIS OUR SUGGESTION AND MAKE A NO LEFT TURN OFF GAARDE ONTO 110th AND A BARRICADE ON 110th. WE ARE GETTING AND HAVING GOOD POLICE SUPPORT, FIRST STAFF AND YOUR TRAFFIC ADVISORY COMM. IS NOT PUTTING SAFETY IN ITS PROPER PLACE , SECONDLY STAFF SHOULD BE LOOKING TO THE ECONOMICS, THE DOWN TIME OF POLICE CARS AND MOTORCYCLES JUST SETTING WAITING OR CHASING AND TICKET-' ING CARS ON PARK AND 110th DOING 30-45 mph WHICH WOULD BE BETTER SPENT WITH A ONE OR TWO A DAY DRIVE THRU PATROLS. I WILL EXPLAIN WHY THIS A CLASS ACT OF FUTILITY, THE PAPER WORK ON THE TICKET WRITING, AND THEN MORE PAPER WORK AT SHIFT END, THE COURT CLERKS TIME, THEN THE MOST EXPENSIVE IS THE PER HOUR FEE FOR A RENT A JUDGE TO (-JSTEN, THEN THAT OFFICER LOSING MORE STREET TIME APPEARING IN COURT. THEN THE ENSUING FINES WHICH ARE NOT COLLECTED WHICH IN THIS CITY IS A VERY SUBSTANTIAL AMONT, STAFF IS MAKINGS SAFETY A HOOP WITH LIVES AS THE STICK, WE DESERVE BETTER Catil• rle �s+LtQ CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON .5255�� lu :._ MEMORANDUM cal TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Patrick J. Reilly, City Administrator DATE: March 31, 1989 SUBJECT: WEEKLY NEWSLETTER 1. City Center. Attached is an important memo from Tim. I urge you to read and let me know any comments. Also, I will be calling during the next week to ask what specific changes to the plan you have in mind so that we can be prepared on'.Apr1. 10th:"c." 2 Transportation.h2000 Attached is 're�port on subject Presentation will be ` made to:..you, soliciting-your'endorsement, ont`Ap±il tslOth.. 3. Recreation Programs During May. Attached please find schedule. 4. Volunteer Dinner. Unless otherwise determined, is scheduled for May 31st at Fowler. 5. Girl Scout Cleanup is next scheduled for August 19th. 6. Japanese Beetle. State is conducting another control effort this spring/summer in Riverwood Lane area as a follow-up to last year's program. 7. NPO. Draft resolution is attached for comment. 8. National Library Week is April 9-15. 9. Ann Turner Meeting. Turner attended NPO meeting on March 29th and received information from meeting and from Keith Liden; for that reason meeting of March 30th with staff was cancelled. mh9488D C c (117 Dov c i^lam• i,„„„,„,„,_,„ WASHINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF LAND USE 150 NORTH FIRST AND TR �NSPODT ATION RECEIVED HILLSBORO, OREGON 97124 648-8761 � �nruv.�� vi. .., • /24-AJD� G�0 y Community D c&opment 4-7-7-----(41, /s /032-6-A-. 17- Oma' /, i/� y �9 S /� c� CO URIC G S 7- u� r 61/ S//D u1S w c-2 6-117_44/4E,9- � ��. �r Q�1`- � s�o c0y e-/N. sA &vex,' �� G Ger i� /i1/ s T.q-T� ff D G�7- ,U�u � /fr� O ti C 'o5 E0 � �DO�� w�T Y U /S /Nf:30( c� w NT 70 co ' p P o(N6' /tet Gam` � • 644- �G r L `o L- I • C.f`: • WASHINGTON COUNTY. OREGON March 21 , 1989 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN 4) FROM: Bruce A. Warner, Directors • RE: TRANSPORTATION 2000 NEEDS AND LEGISLATIVE PROGRAMS Attached for your use are the following items of information on the Region Transportation 2000 Improvement and Legislative Program: 1. Transportation 2000 Overview (Exhibit 1 ) a. Government and private-sector committee membership b. Goals of committee (long range vision) - Regional Transportation Corridor Needs -- Highway Corridors -- Transit Corridors -- Urban Arterial System -- Transit Service c. Legislative Program Outline 2. List of organizations that have either endorsed the funding proposal or are considering endorsement (Exhibit 2) 3. Regional Transportation Improvement Program (Exhibit 3) • 4. Beaverton Area & Portland Metropolitan Chambers of Commerce and Sunset Corridor Association resolutions endorsing Transportation 2000 funding proposal (Exhibit 4) • 5. Estimated local government payrolls and tax associated with Senate Bill 476 (Exhibit 5) If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me or Jerry Parmenter. Attachments J P 2000/H/ Department of Land Use And Transportation,Administration 150 North First Avenue Hilsboro,Oregon 97124 Phone:503/646-8761 • . • . . 1 1 1 1 l?OZ17YOKOOO Tiff.1 0 , . r March 1989 William D.Robertson.Jr. Vice President.Pacific Power Chair o7 the co— "- ^ -- Transportation 2000 is an alliance of government and private- Robert Ames sector business people who have forged a consensus on the President First interstate Bank metropolitan region's road, transit and rail priorities. Ken Harrison President Thegoal of the Transportation 2000 Committee is to encourage Portland General Corp. g Michael H°Dern an economy that can compete in the 21st century and maintain Chairman the quality of life that Oregonians enjoy. Livability and growth Oregonpotation depend upon a solid transportation system that will serve the Commission William S.Naito state and regional economies. President Norcrest China Company The Transportation 2000 Legislative Program is designed to: CherPerr Vice Pyl residenint Fred Meyer,inc. • Promote local investment in the road, transit and rail im- William to Sil Ort growing state and William C.Scott.Jr. provements that are necessarypP President regional economies. Pacific Development.inc. Loren Wyss - • Give local jurisdictions and local voters the tools they need n-M Board of Directors to fund local transportation needs, and to prevent those ' i Pauline Anderson needs from becoming a crisis for the state. ,�^ Commisser (' s4uhtiomah County • Lessen the burden on the Highway Fund for maintenc nce \. :,art m Biumenauer and construction of new highways by investing in cost- City City oCPortlatid effective transit and rail facilities. Bonnie Hays Chair Washington County The Transportation 2000 Legislative Program is outlined on the Commission back of this page. Ed Lindquist Commissioner Claciurnas County Mike Ragsdale Presiding Officer Metro Council 1 For further information.contact Dick Feeney,Jody Fischer or Nan Heim at the Lobby Message Center.378-9800. �-� AfnB/r 1 FACT SHEET STATE HIGHWAY TRUST FUND k REVENUES PURPOSE: The purpose of this fact sheet is to provide information on comparison of road revenues received by Cities as result of current and proposed legislative actions. ESTIMATED ROAD REVENUES (DOLLARS) LEGISLATIVE SESSION CITIES 19871 1989 (Proposed)2 Cornelius 71 ,867 55,728 Forest Grove 168,109 130,358 Tigard 347,174 269,211 Sherwood 40,879 31 ,699 Tualatin 163,809 127,023 Hillsboro 444,775 344,895 Beaverton 541 ,592 419,971 NOTES: 1. Estimated amount represents how much annual increase in read �� revenues city will receive, based on 1987 ?..,._._1ve action, when law is in full effect January 1 , 1991. 2. Estimated amount represents how much additional annual increase in road revenues city will receive, based on proposed 1989 legislative action, when law is in full effect January 1 , 1991 . REVENUES/H/ JP:hs 3/22/89 , tea r- • -..e long-range vision Pursuing this vision will mean both improving Urban arterial system-Urban arterials, Any plan encompassing the transpor- the existing transportation system as well as such as Powell Boulevard,Sunnyside Roac. tation needs of the entire Portland undertaking new construction.Three major Tualatin-Sherwood Road and Murray metropolitan area must have a compelling areas have been identified where the work Boulevard.should be improved to support vision.The Metropolitan Service District needs to be done: the regional corridors,provide access from and the cities and counties of the region those corridors to development areas and have defined that vision and will guide the Regional corridors-Regional transporta- accommodate travel within the region. plan as it is implemented in the coming tion corridors should be improved to make it years• convenient to move through the region. Transit service-Bus service should be Development of a light,rail system through- extended to areas as they become more There are two principles: out the region should be pursued to minimize urban and more densely populated in order highway construction and encourage to serve local access and support light rail E Encourage and facilitate the development. corridors• economic growth of the Portland - region ■Highway corridors-Major regional highways require improvement including •-• Economic growth is necessary for the the construction of several new links to d .liability of the region and the state. serve traffic movement across and :nvestmertt in transportation improve- through the region. meet is needed to both promote and 'facilitate this economic growth. ■Transit corridors-Quality transit service is essential in a number of ■Protect the quality of life for corridors to complement highway facilities residents of the region and provide access to major destinations. Light rail and high-quality bus service in The region should avoid the these corridors provide an attractive excessive traffic problems and alternative to the automobile and degradation of livability common to reduce the impacts of major highway major growth areas. widening. Transportation 2000 Legislative Program • (Bill numbers are listed when available.) 1.Increase the state gasoline tax and equivalent weight-mile La x by two cents per gallon on January 1, 1991. 2.Increase the state's annual vehicle registration fee from S10 tc S20 on January 1, 1990. 3.Enable counties to levy a local vehicle registration fee no greater than the state fee. 4.Extend the transit payroll tax to local governments. (SB 476) 5.Establish a Regional Light Rail Construction Extension Fund to set requirements and name the projects eligible for state funding. The legislation does not appropriate monies this session. (SB 475) 6.Provide routine transit capital match at approximately 38 million per biennium. 7.One-cent cigarette tax increase dedicated to elderly and handi- • ; capped transportation. (HB 3209) 8.Referral of a constitutional amendment to allow local vehicle registration fees to be used for transit. Funds from this registration fee could only be used following approval in a statewide election on the Constitutional amendment and in a second local election. (S.J. Res. 12) - March, 1989 • �` N6 1E '1.a tN/a✓G OR G�^// �}T/G`NS 4-RE /4) �RITG S .. � - Con,ST-Pek/v6_-_ -TSE.__ TR, GR7; -7c / 02000 - +i L..—r.�. ..•Iut r _ eu 77 put DSM i° P L .:_ _... - . . Transportation Funding Proposal ..- Outreach Proorai • Proposed Contact Organization Responsibility Speakers YES 1. Oregon Business Council Done - 1/89 Ken Harrison y$5 2. Portland Metro Chamber Done - 2/17/89 Ken Harrison Board YE-53. Sunset Corridor Assn. Done 1/B9 Mike Ragsdale 4. Sunset Corridor Quar- Done - 3/1/89 Ragsdale, Hollern, terly Meeting Bill Scott 5. T.V.E.D.C. Betty Atteberry ? y43 6. Beaverton Chamber Betty Atteberry ? 7. Hillsboro Chamber Betty Atteberry ? ye58. 1-205/Sunnyside Corri- Done - 1/25/89 Mike Ragsdale dor Assn. 9.. Columbia Corridor Assn. • Dave Fredrickson ? 10. 1-5 Corridor Assn. Betty Atteberry ? - • - 11. Port of Portland Andy Cotugno .Bob Ames yE512. Associated General Done - 2/20/89 Ragsdale, Naito, Contractors • Hollern g.513. Metro Council Done - 1/12/89 • . .Mike Ragsdale +, . \ y55 14_ Washington Co_ Comm. Done - 12/88 Bonnie Hays - ` y4515. Multnomah Co. Comm. Pauline Anderson ? •j16. Clackamas Co. Comm. • Ed Lindquist st ? .... _- 17. City of Portland- Grace Crunican.. . 7 . Council Y6518. Tri-Met Board Done - 2/22/89 Wyss, Robertson 19. Washington Co. Transp. Done - 3/8/89 Bonnie Hays Coord. Comm. • 20. East Multnomah Co. Pauline Anderson Pauline Anderson • Transp. Comm. . -. -: Andy Cotugno • 21. Clackamas Co. Mayors Tom VanderZanden 2 and Managers Assn. 22. Association for Port- Andy Cotugno Bill Naito land Progress - 3/9/89 23._ Building Owners and•-... Andy Cotugno Bill Naito, Managers Assn. - 3/8/89 Ragsdale, Blumenauer . : -_.=x_24_--Association of Oregon--__._.:.. Bill Robertson.:-:_ -_Robertson,- liollern_,. . . .':. - -• Industries - --._. . ---:-7.-- 25.-- American Electronics =- . _ Betty Atteberry-f..!-:::7- - - - -7-:-.--,-,-. _ _ .- •. 26. Clackamas Co. Employers Tom VanderZanden . Ed Lindquist Assn. 27. North Clackamas Chamber Tom VanderZanden Ed Lindquist 28.. Gresham Chamber - 3/22/89 Pauline Anderson ? • 29. Central Eastside Indus- Andy Cotugno ? - trial Council ) yr...130. Building Trades Council - Done - 2/28/89 Rena Cusma • • 8/7- 2 . • ••••• • . • . . . . .. -- •• • . ... , .. . _. _ . . _ • . ._. . _.. — 31. Forest Grove/Cornelius-----Bruce Warner Economic Development Assn. - ------ 32. Cities of Beayerton, Bruce Warner 7 Hillsboro, Tuala n, Sherwood 33. Milwaukie, Gresham ? . '"? 34. Oregon Transportation Ted Spence, Ragsdale, Hollern, Commission - 3/21/89 Bruce Warner Harrison, Robertson 35. Citizens for Better Loren Wyss Loren Wyss Transit --- 36. Home Builders Assn. Bruce Warner Dick Waker 37. Amalgamated Transit Andy Cotugno Rena Cusma, Ed Union Lindquist 38. Portland, Oregon Andy Cotugno Cheryl Perrin Visitors Assn. - 3/23/89 • 39. Oregon Education Assn. ? ? 40. Teamsters Andy Cotugno Rena Cusma 41. Central Labor Council Andy Cotugno Rena Cusma 42. Oregonian Editorial Done - 3/9/89 Cusma, Robertson, Board Hollern 43. Oregon Tourism Alli- Ted Spence ance - Tr. Comm. - • - - - - 3/8/89 - 44. CEDO - . Tom VanderZanden 45. Assn. of Heating, Re- Andy Cotugno ? . . frigeration, Air Con- _ - te--- . ...--- [ ditioning Engineers - ------- -- - -- • ---- - . • - _ .. __ .. 5/18/89 - 6:00 p.m. - - . . -. - . -• . . - • - -- • , - . . . . . ..._... . _ .... ._ . .... . . _ . . .. __ . . ... .___ --- - • _ ... . ._.,._:__.. -...!..- •- .1-.1:_:_-____:-_-...:-_-_,. .-_:_-1-.__-...1.:... - ----'-- ----.'*-:-..----*:;.'"--.- - . ----.:;.-:_.--------.-- ''-..-ff---771-1*.- -----=:--:--:-':--•:z-2-- .__. . --- . - • . - • _ . . _._. ... .. .._ .. . _ -_:.-_,--........tr-..•:-.--- ..., ,,,,-----.7.-7-7....-"`=,..-::=::7...Tr...Z.,--...::=-....--•...........Z....Z=7,i••...1..-7".....:z.....:...". ..:.-...17......Z......,.....7...=......,-......,-.•47:1,,.•.--..--:'c.v.t..--.-.7,1:-.4...•...:......-:--.r..- . . - ' ---- - -- - - - • • - ---. • - • - - - .. . . - - - • • • . . OUTRCH.LST •\ ) • _...- . • • C REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM A major capital improvement program is required to upgrade the "Major Regional Highway Corridors, " construct LRT and improve the region ' s "Urban Arterial System. " The Regional Transportation Plan identifies a program of ten and twenty year priorities necessary to keep pace with the implementation of local comprehensive land use plans. Described below is a brief synopsis of the program with particular attention to the ten year priorities. Maior Regional Hiahwav Corridors This is the network of major state highways intended to • provide access across and through the region. It serves a number of key regional and statewide functions including commuting from one part of the region to another and access for residents and . commerce into and out of the region. It is the backbone of the highway network carrying the highest traffic volumes the longest distances. • - The regional highway system is comprised of the freeways and other major highways, including: -1-5 North to Vancouver and beyond to Seattle; -1-5 South to Tigard, Tualatin, Wilsonville and beyond to the Willamette Valley; -1-84 east to Gresham, Troutdale and beyond to the- Columbia * Gorge; -A new expressway connector through Gresham between 1-84 and U.S 26 to Sandy and Mt. Hood; -1-205 through Multnomah, Clackamas and Clark Counties; -U.S. 30 through the Northwest Industrial District and beyond to the Lower Columbia River; ' -Sunset Highway west to Washington County and beyond to the Coast; -Highway 99W exiting the region to Newberg, McMinnville and beyond to the Coast; -Highway 217 interconnecting the Sunset Highway and 1-5 ; -A new route connecting I-5 in the Tualatin area to the Sunset Highway in the Hillsboro area; -The Sunrise Corridor extending along McLoughlin Blvd. to Milwaukie, Highway 224 through the Clackamas industrial area and along Highways 224 and 212 through Damascus, Boring and connecting to U.S. 26 to Mt. Hood; -The I-5 and 1-405 loop in the downtown Portland area interconnecting traffic between 1-5, the Sunset Highway, McLoughlin Blvd. , U.S. 30 and other arterials entering the central city area. 1 • The following is a brief description .of the major priorities required in the next ten years on thisesystem. -5 North Complete the impovements to I-5 between the Marquam Bridge and I-84 to provide increase ramp capacity for northbound traffic to I-84, to provide a new, direct ramp access from McLoughlin Blvd. to and from I-5 North and to provide southbound access to I-5 from the Central Eastside Industrial District. Construct initial stages of improvement between I-84 and the • Fremont Bridge to increase capacity and improve weave movements onto and off of the freeway, complete interchange improvements in the vicinity of Jantzen Beach and the Oregon Slough and widen in the vicinity of N. Portland Blvd. 1-84 Complete widening and reconstruction east to 181st Ave. and initiate reconstruction and widening at least to the proposed new interchange connecting to the new expressway through Gresham to U.S. 26; provide a new interchange in the vicinity of 207th Ave. 1-84/U.S. 26 Connector Initiate construction on the new expressway connector through Gresham; three possible routes are under consideration, each connecting to I-84 in the vicinity of the 238th Ave. interchange: one following 242nd Ave. and Burnside Rd. , a second following 242nd •Ave crossing- Burnside and Powell and reconnecting to U.S. 26 south of Gresham and a thirc following 242nd Ave. and Stark St. and then generally following a 282nd Ave. corridor south to U.S. 26. This new expressway would be constructed with a minimum of access points to provide a high grade connector from 1-84 to U.S. 26 for Multnomah and Clark Counties. It will also provide better access into downtown Gresham from the rest of the region. I-205 Provide new and/or improved interchanges .on 1-205 at Airport Way, Sandy Blvd. , Johnson Creek Blvd. Sunnyside Rd. (and Sunnybrock just south) and to the new Sunrise Corridor connection east of Y•-205 at Highway 224. I-5 South Provide new and/or improved interchanges on 1-5 at Terwilliger, Capitol Highway, Highway .217/Kruze Way, Boones Ferry Rd. , Nyberg Rd. , Stafford Rd. , Wilsonville Rd. and to the initial stage of the Tualatin-Hillsboro corridor south. of I-205. Bunset Highway In conjunction with LRT from Portland to Washington County, complete the westbound climbing lane from the zoo to the Canyon Rd. interchange, upgrade the interchange at Sylvan (Skyline Blvd. ) and widen the highway to six lanes from Canyon Rd. to Highway 217 then beyond to at least 158th Ave. (Cornell Rd. ) . 2 Biahwav 217 Initiate upgrading of Highway 217 to include widening to six lanes from Sunset Highway to T.V. Highway and from Scholls Ferry Rd. to 1-5 , including interchange upgrading at Highway 99W and at Greenberg Rd. Tualatin-Hillsboro Corridor Construct Phase 1 from I-5 to Highway 99W providing a new route to/from Newberg, McMinnville and the Coast without going through downtown Tigard. In the long term, this route will provide one link in the corridor connecting to T.V. Highway east of downtown Hillsboro. Construct Phase 2 of the corridor providing an arterial upgrading of 216th/219th • between T.V. Highway and Sunset Highway at the Cornelius Pass Rd. interchange. In addition, complete engineering, environmental and land use studies for the segment between Highway 99W and T.V. Highway. Sunrise Corridor In conjunction with the improvements to I-5, provide a direct connection to I-5 northbound from McLoughlin Blvd. ; construct the planned overpass at Tacoma Blvd. and widening of McLoughlin Blvd. south tolHighway 224; complete initial segments of widening of the Clackamas Expressway between McLoughlin Blvd. and I-205 , particularly in the vicinity of downtown Milwaukie and at the I-205/Sunrise Corridor interchange; provide a new expressway route as an extension of the Clackamas • expressway east of 1-205, through Camp Whithycombe and connecting into Highway 212 near Carver Junction; construct initial segments of the Highway 212 widening between Carver Junction and U.S. 26 particularly through Damascus and Boring. 1-405 Complete a reconnaissance, engineering study of 1-405 to identify future needed improvements, particularly for access to the Sunset Highway, the Ross Island Bridge and surrounding developments_ II. Light Rail Transit The region plans for an expansion of MAX into a regionwide system, serving each of the major corridors and providing an important supplement in capacity for the adjacent highway where the alternative of additional highway widening is often impractical. LRT provides a high quality transit alternative that can attract the level of ridership needed to relieve the highway system. . In addition, it more economical to operate than a significant expansion in bus service because of the efficiency of larger vehicles requiring fewer operators. In addition, LRT is important for full implementation of the density levels called for in local comprehensive land use plans. 3 The LRT routes will provide the backbone for the transit system much like the freeways do for the highway system. LRT will be interconnected with feeder bus routes through "timed- transfer" stations and will be the location of major park-and- ride lots. In addition to the priorities described below for the next ten years, LRT is recommended for construction during the next twenty years in the I-5 North corridor to at least Vancouver and in the Barbur corridor to at least Tigard. In addition routes may be feasible and should be considered in the Highway 217 corridor, and south of Milwaukie and/or the Clackamas Town Center to Oregon City. The following is a brief description of the LRT priorities for construction for the next ten years. Westside LRT The next LRT priority for the region is to extend MAX west along the Sunset Highway to Highway 217 ; thence south to Beaverton and finally west to at least 185th Ave. Major transfer stations will be provided at Highway 217 @ Sunset, in downtown Beaverton and at 185th Ave. with 2-3000 parking spaces provided at a number of station locations. LRT will be directly integrated with planned developments at the Highway 217/Sunset interchange and is being considered as an important part of redevelopment plans in downtown Beaverton. LRT is a key part of the transportation system connecting between the major growth area of .Washington County and downtown Portland, the hub of the Portland region. Because of the limited number of routes through the West Hills and the difficulty of widening these highways, LRT provides a critical expansion of transportation capacity, avoiding the construction of 2-4 additional lanes on the Sunset Highway and providing the long term flexibility to easily expand capacity with the addition of LRT vehicles. LRT is also important for continued growth of downtown Portland as a major employment, cultural, retail and .services center in the region and the state. LRT provides the means of • serving the central city area without major new highway • expansion, with a minimum of required new parking and with a system that is comfortable and attractive to the rider. Milwaukie LRT LRT is proposed to connect downtown Portland to downtown Milwaukie via one of three possible routes: across the Hawthorne Bridge and south to Milwaukie via either McLoughlin Blvd. or along the Portland Traction right-of-way adjacent to the Willamette River or south through Riverplace (on the west side of the Willamette River) , through the John' s Landing area and crossing to the east side of the river in conjunction with a new 4 , Sellwood Bridge to Milwaukie. LRT to Milwaukie is an important part of the McLoughlin Blvd. highway improvements with the need for widening the section north of the planned overpass at Tacoma being delayed for at least ten years. In addition, in the long term, LRT results in avoiding the need for 2 additional lanes on McLoughlin Blvd. for its length between Union/Grand and downtown Milwaukie. LRT in the Portland to Milwaukie corridor will be considered to possibly extend east to Clackamas Town Center. Depending upon the outcome of the I-205 corridor, this connection could be built in lieu of or in addition to the 1-205 connection to the Clackamas Town Center. I-205 LRT If LRT is feasible in the I-205 corridor, Interstate funds now available for construction of a busway along 1-205 will be transferred to LRT. In actuality, two 1-205 corridors are under consideration: one as an extension of MAX, providing. direct service from downtown Portland north to the Portland International Airport and the second providing direct service from downtown Portland south to the Clackamas Town Center; both would be routed through the existing Gateway MAX station. I-205 LRT would provide a regional connection to the airport, from the central city area, from Beaverton via a through routed connection to the Westside LRT and from Clackamas and east Multnomah County through the Gateway station. This would provide a convenient alternative to auto access, provide long term relief to airport parking demands a provide a marketing tool for the Portland region and the new Oregon Convention Center. An LRT extension to Clackamas Town Center would improve access to downtown Portland for the far Southeast residential areas, provide access to Clackamas Town Center shopping and job opportunities for Portland and Multnomah County residents and provide a focus for further development and redevelopment along the corridor, especially at Foster Rd. , Johnson Creek Blvd. and in the Clackamas Town Center area. Downtown Portland Mall LRT As additional corridors are added to the MAX system and additional trains need to be accommodated in downtown Portland, the existing tracks on • Morrison and Yamhill will not have sufficient capacity. At that point, LRT will be considered for expansion onto the 5th/6th Ave. transit mall. This combined capacity will allow for the further expansion of MAX into the I-5 North and Barbur corridors and increase the efficiency of the Banfield and Westside routes by expanding the areas of downtown directly served by LRT. 5 XII. Urban Arterials The urban arterial system provides- for local access into different parts of the region, sub-regional travel movements that are not long enough to require using the regional system and to provide access to and from the regional system tor regional and statewide travel. Urban arterial and collector routes can be 2-6 lanes wide and are important traffic routes, providing the intermediate system, in between local streets and freeways. Urban arterials tend to be multi-jurisdictional, requiring a similar type facility as it passes from one jurisdiction into the next. Urban arterial improvements tend to be difficult to fund, especially now with the completion of the Interstate Transfer program. Cities and counties generally do not have sufficient funds to meet maintenance needs and ODOT arterials take lower priority for state funding to the major highway corridors. Urban arterial improvements are needed throughout the metropolitan • areas, in newly devloping areas to provide the basic infrastructure needed to serve growth and in existing developed areas as the areas respond to growing traffic pressures and redevelopment. The major arterial improvements identified as priorities in the next ten years are as .follows: ODOT Arterials CP T.V. Highway - Hillsboro $ 7.5 m. T.V. Highway - Murray to Hillsboro 10.0 T.V. Highway- Through Beaverton • 6.5 Boones Ferry Road 3. 8 Scholls Ferry Road - west of Highway 217 8. 0 Farmington Road 9. 1 Hall Boulevard - Tigard 3. 0 • Scholls Ferry - west of Murray 2.9 Barbur 0 Hamilton 5. 0 Barbur: • Hamilton-Terwilliger 2.5 NE Portland Highway ® 60th 3.5 Beaverton-Hillsdale Highway ® Capitol 2.7 McLoughlin - through Milwaukie 3. 0 Highway 213 - south of Oregon City 3.9 Powell Boulevard - east of 1-205 10.0 Powell Boulevard - Gresham 9. 0 Miscellaneous other arterials 10.9 • 6 I City/County Arterials Cornell Road - east of Highway 26 $ 5.3 m. Cornell Road - west of Highway 26 9.4 Murray Boulevard 21.9 Brookwood - Cornell To T.V. Highway 3.4 Barnes Road 5. 1 Cornelius Pass Road 2. 6 Tualatin-Sherwood Road 9.4 Baseline Road 12. 0 Beef Bend Road 9. 6 N. Columbia Boulevard 2. 3 Foster Road 7. 8 Northwest Triangle area improvements 2. 0 Convention Center area improvements 2.7 N. Macadam area improvements 4. 0 Beavercreek Road 2. 0 Sunnyside/Sunnybrook Road 11.5 Monterey/97th near I-205 2.5 Thiessen Road 2.2 82nd Drive 2.7 Cornelius Pass Road 15. 8 238th/242nd - Gresham 4. 6 • 162nd 6.0 223rd - Fairview 5.9 207th 8. 1 257th 4. 0 Willamette River bridges 16.9 Arterials 38.4 A: \CORRIDOR 2-15-89 • 7 • BEAVERTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE • 4800 S.W.Orrtthn Dr.,Suite 100 Seev''ion.Oregon 97005-8721 503-6444123 RESOLUTION ' • IN ACCORDANCE WITH: the Beaverton Area Chamber of Commerce stated objective to prioritize the development of a comprehensive regional transportation plan as a key component of their economic eevelopment effort, and IN CONSIDERATION OF: the status of the S1 billion revenue shortfall needed to meet the highway and transit priorities identified for the region for the next ten years. .BE IT RESOLVED... The Board of Directors of the Beaverton Area Chamber of Commerce has unanimously endorsed the financial initiative being proposed by JPACT to the 1989 Oregon Legislature, which includes: ° Creation of a state light rail construction fund for the purpose of providing future state appropriations toward one-half the local match for LRT. • o Continued state appropriations for routine transit capital during the 1989- 91 biennium at a level of $3.3 million/yea:. o Imponition of a vehicle registration fee in the Metro region, at a level ---up to that collected by the state, for creation of an arterial improvement fund and for LRT local match. o Extension of the I__-Met payroll tax to include local governments and others. o Increase state cigarette tax by one cent to provide additional transit support for the elderly and handicapped. • o Amend the State Constitution, to allow local option to use currently restricted highway-related sources for transit as well as highway purposes. • o Increase the state gasoline tax by two cents a year annually for each of the next 10 years. o Increase the state vehicle registration fee by $20. Signed: Beaverton Mona L.. Ceoar Hills CederOak Hills Mill a ry .low, resident Progress Rateign Hills Rock Creek _ SunsetCo.rldor Late C�/f-)/ Q J ,1 tr.m. G...... RESOLUTION IN ACCORDANCE KITH.: the Sunset Corridor Association' s stated objective to prioritize the development of a comprehensive regional transportation plan as a key component of their economic development effort, and IN CONSIDERATION OF: the status of the Si billion revenue shortfall needed to meet the highway and transit priorities identified for the region for the next ten years . BE IT RESOLVED. . . The Board of Directors of the Sunset Corridor Association has unanimously endorsed the financial initiative being proposed by JPACT to the 1989 Oregon Legislature, which includes: • o Creation of a state light rail construction fund for the purpose of providing future state appropriations toward one- half the local match for LRT. o Continued state appropriations for routine transit capital during the 1989-91 biennium at a .level of S3 .3 million/yr. o Imposition of a vehicle registration fee in the Metro region, at a level up to that collected by the state, for creation of an arterial improvement fund and for LRT local match. o Extension of the Tri-Met payroll tax to include local governments and others. o Increase state cigarette tax by one cent to provide additional transit support for the elderly and handicapped. o Amend the State Constitution, to allow local option to use • currently restricted highway-related sources for transit as well as highway purposes . o Increase the state gasoline tax by two cents a year annually for each cf the next 10 years . o Increase the state vehicle registration fee by $20 . • Resolution of the Portland Metropolitan CharnDer of Commerce WHEREAS, the Portland Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce in ` cooperation with the Oregon Business Council sponsored the Business Committee on Regional Transportation Priorities; and WHEREAS, the Business Committee thoroughly reviewed regional plans for transportation improvements in the Portland metropolitan area and options. for transportation planning; and WHEREAS, the review was closely coordinated with and is consistent with the conclusions of the Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation and the Public-Private Task Force on Transit Finance; and WHEREAS, transportation improvements are vital to facilitate continued economic prosperity and growth in the Portland region while avoiding the excessive traffic problems and degradation of livability common to other growth areas; and WHEREAS, a balanced regional transit and highway approach is important to implement, now therefore BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PORTLAND METROPOLITAN CHAMBER OF 1. That the Chamber endorses the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Business Committee on Regional Transportation Priorities 2. That the Chamber endorses the following priorities under consideration by y the 1989 Oregon Le_..slature:• a. Creation of a state light rail construction fund for the ptspose of providing future state appropriations toward one-half the local • match for LRT. b. Extension of the Tri-Mec payroll tax.to local governments to be used for regional costs of LP.T and bus service expansion. c Increase of the state cizerette tax one cent toward elderly and • handicapped transit services. • d. Continued state appropriations for routine transit capital. • e. A constitutional amendment to -allow locally imposed vehicle registration fees to be used for LRT. I. -Support of statewide gas tax increases. • g. Support of vehicle registration fee increases. . h. Imposition of a vehicle registration fee in the Portland resion for creation of an arterial improvement fund and for LRT local match. • • • 3 That the Chamber encourages its members to communicate the importance of these prioritie§'to their legislative representatives. r H In 'O Cu O .O N ^ n A 0 � P O .O In 0. O V 0 '0 X4.4 a n 0 0 ^ Cu rS CA M A •s N an O 0 V H A - Cu O P V NO H P •D an V. .0 P P o o n In _ n A In an A M O N NV CO P Cu. O N .. A — P n O Co N M N .0 K V. K Cu N Cu V .0 .0 P P CV • M — Cu H n - a/. — N v. W CI Si Cu • V .O .O O O 0 CuV• • .D .0 O CO 0 .• •D .D O CO 0 _ N Cu •'5 n .D N N n M V V 'D CuN N n M .D C 7 O 0 0 0 O O O O o o O O O 00 O O 000 00 O O cc v to 0 0 10c, 0 0 C. 001000100C, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L• x _ 00000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o • O C U a N '0 �. — CO CO - A A H in 'O *0 — ^ P 0. - • A A 0 CO O O A A A A 0O. .0 .D ^ CuA A O O O O .�. C O O .0 b N Cu n n .O .O O O .0 *0 n n 0 A A Cu N N N O O V �- r ¢ �. . - ^ an V >. P P .O .D N N O b N A (SiN N O .D O CO L C Cu N O O A .D .D P P 0 0 A O O N an A r*2 n n L - - In In A A Cu Cu .D .O O 0 O O Cu N V V n In N N Cu Cu N - Co W mC . In N P C. - V In A A O O P P HnM V CO O O O O O P P Cu Co N • • N Cu n n O .- N N n H V 0 — N Cu n n V '0 P 0. P P P P P 0. P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P ia 0 a 0 — 0 — o' — 0 — 0 — 0 — 0 — 0 — 0 — 0 — O CJ n in in in on in n n n n n in in H as H n n n n Al at In In N .O N .O Cu .0 Cu .0 Cu .O N .O N .D Cu .0 N .O N .D Cu .O N .O Cu • In - CV • n ^ .T ^ Cu ^ n ^ V Co P — P Cu P In P 0 P a P N P H P 0 P a P Cu P n P 0 P \ 0. \ 0. \ 0. \ 0. \ P \ P \ 0. \ P \ P \ P \ P \ A ^ A ' A ^ A A A A A A A A ^ A O _ • .O O O N N IN N O A IA in P 0 • r _n V• N P �. N n .D Cu A O 0 N O. an ✓ C CS: P N N O Cu Cu O O In ^ 0. A .. C n O n n P .D - C O In V1 n A In I> A in V. A W N A A. 0 A A co co - .O co co P a a a o w M .i n n M K M K .• M M M M a Cr C O .O M co _ — O A 0.. V C 0 A In Cu L X0 O A Cs- IS ID ID O C. .O • .D A in A IVM CD .. M C • X • N n ..- N n O P 0. P O. P P P P 0. P P P E C. m O a- 0.C C L V C 17 U d s. 0 CI J O 0 C7 > ? O '7 C ` E O O U - o N 4.1 — L.0 C. C.. CI O CI a _n o O .�. To W I.J 'S 0 _ V - A .O N .- M .O V. n N CO .0 .3 an - H-A o7 V• A = .O a O C. _O A 0. V. IA n A ' CV C. - P n. Co .O Ct CO Co. N .0 p V N V n O N P .' n N n V P .O P N A v N ✓ . . • �- VD In E .D N .O In N n n .O N V. A 0 A O O n .0 n ' V. O n n A n CI. s- V\ O •- .O N . v A N N n n Sr. In .D ▪ µ K K .-- - N N N V. S. K M W M K K Mr M In W O at O O O _N - .O .O O O O N - .- .O .O O O O IV v .T .O .0 N N on on - v .O - N Cu on r. v v .O - N N on n - .0 C 7 O O D D O O O O 00000000 000010000 Ct .- O O O O D O O O O O O O O O O O 000000. 00 V .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 C u ▪ y 10 ..•. - .0 .0 - - In y CO O N N O O .O .0 N IV - 2 O O A A 0 0 o 0 O O A A .0 .0 0' CO - V. IA IV A .0 M IV N P 0. v v A A 0 n n O O v �' O co P P n M - - C = 7.. •••• ••• O CO N110 CO O A A N IV A A .O .O R O. .O .O A A - p - - on n - - .0 .O .O .0 O O O. R NA A A N IV IV IV A A L n n In V v A A A A .0 .O A A O O P 0- O O n n V. 0 CD ' A A - - A IA ^ W t O O O O IV IV .7 - -CD CD ^ - N N N N O. O. O O O O v n n - Sr v- 1.4 . . . . K K K *4 K K O O. O. P P 0- O. P C. P 0. O. 0- P P P P P P P P Cl. P P D. 10 O •-• O - O ••• O .- O .- O •-• O ••• O ••• O• '•• O ^ O - 0 d In On In In n n n n n M n in n !n In n n n n in n ':n n n C. IV .O CO O N .0 N .O N .O N .O N .O N .O N .0 IV ..0 N .O N .0 • . . . IV -• M -• v -• - -• IV -• H - • - . - N -• I^'1 - O O. - 0. N P n P O O. - O. CV 0. n 0. O 0. - O. N O. In 0. O. S. 0. A. 0. \ Cl. S. P A. O. A. O. \ 0. A. P S. O. A 0- \ O. A A A A A A A A A A A A A N N O. .O In IV - O - - .0 Cl - _ - Cu A N V. N sr .O us P - p O O. A O A A N O O v C A - N - IV 0. N In E▪ O IV .0 O. on in - O - v1 1.11 O O A ▪ L O .O .O 0. V. - n - Q . . . . W - K K K M K M K K 0. 0 N N A K ti M K d -' O2 on . C. IPI C O .O P In E r N r C.• O O. ^ L L L .p .Q. O. IV ot an C > K K - ..- M 'J N VI .-- N n .- N n O O. 0. 0. P 0. P 0. 0. O. 0. 0. P )• Y T Y I• I• T T D. - S- Y L v - W v W - W W ON. - W Z. C cI e., p = ^ ✓ p O ). T. O - u TS o LI C7 in 0 N C G D . 5 .i O V 0 O U 'J Cl, M 0 W N W p 2 P - d d C o m N U d N O > u O x • y t i d N � C - s L C O C L• N L• • • N « v P d 0 t. Y V. L C C o C N « 0 0 o C • N r P C L' C P N C C O C > - C .3 0 c > >. LL' CJ r o c CC • In C a _ c ei > C V u _ O _ O L' = t) C V - C L o c > C o C. c. = C c O o - v c = c C, - O - -, O a C L V iv C Z n C. C o u o C Co L cc N N C• C C).O u co co • D C O C Q N L P D - C o n - a « o r c > - c u O aa. - 0 m Qc Q d c C - r V _ O N r C' t - = V fC 0 J; r V O C = W. G G - is N K O - t: - C • ¢ V. W C C - V t O - N ) .. Y9 •p K O Is O A C. P IN •' - .D M - V• M V MP CO 0 C.. O O M N O O ^ O M N M A C O N O .. CO N V •O Ca. A N O O v .0 V CO .0 C A O N r V O O . .D N .D N P D. - .O Co ^ - M vs O ^ .0 -- �D ' O O _IV M _C M M ...= .0 .D O CoIV ••••• N `D C N K K K r. M N N K M w w IV Co V _N V .D .0 O D O N V V .D .D C C O N V N M *0 O C .0 N Cu M M - •D .- N M M - V V' C. 0000 O O O O O 0 O 00000 000 O 0 0 0 0 CC .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d • x = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • .C U VI - of V N N M M A A V - -- 19 C O O N CV V ' - - N N CO C - - - .D .O O O N IN V - - N. N. O O P 0. C CV M M O O O M M N N O. 0. O O C > A A N CV O C M M C C M M C C. C D •O '0 M InG o O O _O C ^^ O O C CO P O In N N N A A O D S ^ V G N N Co Co A A CV NJ O 0 P 0. O C - - O C O O O O N E H M N In .D .D O CO .0 .O A N. A A O O O O P P O 0 - - IN W In M M M M M M in - - + - N N NJ NJ N M M N M M M K M 0 - - Cu N M M 0 - - N IV M M V 0 N N M . O P 0. P 0. 0. P P P P P P P P P P 0. P P P P Co P P P 0 - O .. O .s O •••• O - 0 •-• 0 .- O - O - O - O - O - V M M h M M M en M M In M M M M V1 In I.1 /4•1M M In In In M O. N O N O N .0 N 40 N •O N .O N .D N .O N .0 N .0 N 40 IV .O - N -• M - • - • - N -• M - - • - N -• M - 0. 1. 0 P N 0. I.1 P O P - 0. N O. M Co O P - P N 0. M 0. \ P \ 0. _\ 0. \ P \ P \ P \ . \ P \ P \ P \ P _\ A4.. A ••••• A A - N. N. A 0.• A A A A - A N.ID 0 0 40 in "' .O 0 N C • NJ O s.. N 1.7 .O - D C P 0 .D .O .O Co p CO N. P - 0 N O O O N V G - j .. N A N. .O •D - r = O D IV VD1 .1.• C v0 O A .0 0 O N ..- L O M 0 N N Co A n O O C A O M A N N A .D O O N W - Co. .D A A A on M M M M In Y K M M K M M M M M M M M d ...... P 0.1 • O N .O O O !•1 0 Co E L A. o ICC O 0 O N L N C •O N IN C L C N N M C Y K M W N 1+1 0 0. 0. 0.0. P 0. 0. P P P0. L C. C O u CJ • ..1 - co I. CJ 0 > _ 0 O O O 0G E IA C ACu u v • ei s.i e ci y- D u c t .sovs.. NvH o roa.srao.+mekpvaam .,. .variD. . O M P O.�N M PX CO.0..O H N P.-..0.+ .11 KOPN PN^r.^^ CI,11 ' H 2ii ~O am II N P � • .Vn � M- v,pP.3Pv • W▪H N.20. .+aO.� N ...JP O..'.a, WOHO P•r 00.-.O.+N1,V>NNO .7 .0H .O V�•NN.-• M. WdO X x •r Nr MO N. sel O w ytr, .XCYMInxONCYNP,MWCOMXNXHCOWW N. Np N O P.Ora P M w X10 68 Cr, W frN.W.00•n� O N O w i Pn Co T.O 00 d.00 P NP N M sa.a a0O..P r 00 DI O. WIN W. VO.o.NO..N..YNr...OH..NP.OHVPa00Va V OV.O....ON.ON•sa00.�M0•n.,.�..“0` 808,- CO0~•0•.0 N•^'•.VnM O.Nf.MON. Nx N..xx.r O. N. O▪ w W. M,NICOWCYW.-1.....PeenMXNAWNINNIxo0W x. NI OW0x0WOOWN,WWWMWOXMCYNN 0... asC W .r N04..... W.r0V ^• W. N 11 N M. • O VPa0....o.6ONOPH-....2coaON�..,m.Via u1PN0.8/t00../'.Oa 6.."..".•c.OPnw.+P68 O V.+aD NCW P MN0 VO N.Os vVar H P.40441V M.0..MX.-. W. N O r V H W. . d0 V x •... rx O.. Ia. M 11 O w O02, VNP.. •NO./VarNia.�V.... 60 ti V a.ti.nM ~ NW. . - p r 0 6P T P CO M..aO.O 0 M a OO N.NS P�SOW P N O M.00 e0 NI a00VVP.O. PV.O..1.,an N1.� W II JP X II O 1 0 a0 0.0 _ •V0 • WWNM_.NN M. 0-= 1.04. N NV0•0.narr,cv 0.Ne Hco..N..v.V M•....••el P~ ILI AM .J. O M r a0 600 N .1 N N M'. 0.M 0 O w OO. ON.O.-..O.O O O.O.n.0.00 N•-..�.n0 ei W N O M M O O CO In•11)V.O r�•r CO N P O u'a O N W 2 CO aW WWNPaOOMOWOWOOM•�WXONP N. .-..^^ W• 0;.Yr 0.N-WXP oMNXWM OO,NVa 0 0P� CO 0i.N.X N. 0 PO N N .p.rMM ON.+ 0000 0 WX Y60 .0 M x •-. .tir N. WPC O un J O ).O ce 11,88 a- 06 87. ^ON..00N.n.•.\H•n.r•OHaO.n NaOOV anx000ONODWOWXNWOWXHCONO.-1 ... .1 .ti,p.OH...OMNV.,cr.pc .0 N WxNIN NMWOINx ZO▪ Ta0 N H •r .. •-•�. r.. 0000 se .66 O W 0 PJp Wa W P N N V N.O P 0•N N V.�r--=aPM 0 Q O•-•M d O M r W e H O P M O CO M N N P a MO • 0 ~N y•..NN NMNPN^• •� • W6 0 P H .ti 4. w p AC 0"m M w.I 2...• • W 2 W W 0 0 0 0 000 • u u d o W. W►>u. u. 2= C .� NNVf`N_W N p COW 06> Z 0 WW 02 WW02•'• U u COW 0 S. U•Oe 0 0e S.Zn..=•W O W.O..d 0 2• • . .d O0 0 e •r <0 t0.a JO000 00 0 2 06m.>.. 1•0JY 2d6 6 20WW K XZ..X 6 K>W2XXY6-W t �>W220.02X0.0X20,0WC�J2 P• • • p JWWJOOW20.•• ..0 ~JZ W • _ Orru. NJ ...2Wx WmeNW ,JI r0n.2� en m ZtWO>O p- =• -==p.002•rW.r WPNHV .- 03.x. mw=.aW6= PPP W00.00.606.•OOWD0r.0 2..20 p DC4fr.yyJOJOaatL6J>.W >•.'•6 20.0*N0.1 >T 0,Cl. CC NM V Yf.00.....n0000-OM1._.p • 00000000�•r...HM.I•nCC - Vii+i>r5 a., .eyLta_ - •.! Uri 2�'oio.(p4! so, , A rCo'C(�.a 'n, :k.43 , 3. 3 - r-Mior - � f ie 1f AI / Vac� I • te-Ciggillik _..] ItkV �',,:1i//ir. ��•°i°0•• t egik CE.,.rz 4.v' �i ��.�� _1 �' ��+� ,�' 00.3..>„.............................); ...roors \ _ , - ...,!. .pb., K. R*9\it NT sia IRO 44 \Ose /S/‘'1\ N'' ..4alcalli I Now a era or mill LID BOUNDARY• ��~`��N •'•1suMIAERLAKE M1FtK E::: •Ie ..I ill if ••\ ,... ' .. ..•••• ,,,.\10.w 4?/ IIIII Villik •eliallill. ill �, + 410%,mg rip 1 • �•. I"' 11'1'111 ; �� ,��A ** Ill 114 Mal CI... MAO,w. , I ,��_��, I Os ic: El /11�/ ,�! �„� ET EL�'t7 al, u I. =11111111111111111k M .iliaar111y11t�11 libmrl♦y'p �►iiiirs1 33 Inividn / 1 1.1: lmik N • ON CT III Isar 4 aAj aw Eitlir. ailli in ill 11' AI rt�tti(ii: vt�{�i1�r o brb� rr ZL�J h '!'',',...:'',72ih n�1 �� m •— ' Ir ;t,ti ,,,i 1 } t l"lri•F 1 r 'it•, r llt. •!4� " '� �y x1�^ o •� • a.i.i� s t t 1 ,,• G 1 t �, 1 H; " I`yfJ �3 �iyas btir �`%'7,77.--..--,-,,•',,r rl�. 11 i, i'`‘:,'04',.:r.''', �•�.r1 �"' � 1111 •‘,4,A,,t Iri. tf }!i' Ti.q t ,, .1, c.,?:1,..,.',.,';!:,.',,i::-.40,+.10.,�r r• ,pm ,� ei ,«IJ� �,r..�f ) � � Ir 1'. y !' fH� ' ly a.. r L ��'. tt s.r.l' + .! rf `EI!i., f �l 3 (�r�' 1 rr rte, , 1' 1 �.s�r ,r0( , r tt*".4frt i j4 rfk,Ycr F y n }ti! s q r t 'It P.: ti F l F -`.`i1 $ 1'�� r al (1c{' 1 i,4 t:..f.:ltyu ;.:1 ','.! k P.'1..,''''''' E , to 0,111 ,r, s m,:,),_ a N� t r� ! . 11111 Uh r:rt fr r, r,:r r, ;. tp}ry _i111 IIII slab .0.-o. . ►» -„ 6,t ,;',i,rt^�'1�I(.4 '11t�,,-;47l rG1 fj� i . AREA OF REDUCED limy ir r,f r i, yr F + ,rte ,, , s .�h ltirrl of:.i1r�,.15!, i� x. ')� ! 1.7- ASSESSMENT RATE am 1 .....p:',,' 1.-fi ti r ,'c1 �, C CENTRON-TIGARP APPEAL OF PUBLIC STREET REQUIREMENT PURPOSE: A If for Internal Circulation: 1. Private Road normally provides that function 2. Public liability for public road option unnecessary- maintenance, policing. B If for External Circulation, that is, properties to the West - Inappropriate: 1. Not on any City plan, in fact as stated at the hearing, it was on a City plan but was removed by plan update by the City Council. 2. Any external traffic wishing to go East should be channeled to Scholls Ferry Road- not be encouraged to go thru this area, or any other neighborhood, be it single or multiple family housing. Encouraging traffic to bypass Scholls Ferry Road by traversing this street and Hawks Beard will inevitably lead to controversy and public complaint. C. If for access to the future City Park on 130th-the facts are as follows: 1. The City Park is intended to be a 10 acre neighborhood park to serve this immediate area. 2. With respect to the access from the Centron project- a trail is to be built within the 5.07 acre wetland in the middle of the site going west to east from 135th to 130th. 3. The multiple family properties to the west of 135th will have access to this wetland and pathway leading to the City park. 4. Perhaps the most significant fact is that based on professional traffic studies, the daily trip generation rate for neighborhood parks is 6.0 to 8.0 weekday trip ends per acre or in this case a maximum of 80 trip ends per day. C • r Since the park is to serve the entire surrounding area, it could be assumed that construction of this thru public street would avoid, at most, 10 vehicle trips per day on Brittany Drive and rather more likely, less than that because of: a. The alternate access discussed above, and b. The fact the multi-family development provides extensive internal open space and recreation areas. Reducing this demand on public open spaces. CONCLUSION: The benefits appear to be: 1. Enhanced inappropriate traffic through both this multi- family area and the single family area. 2. Avoidance of less than 10 trips per day on Brittancy Drive. 3. Public liability for the maintenance and policing of a public street with little or no legitimate purpose. 4. Removal of developable land from the tax rolls. 5. No benefit at all to the project. 6. Future political activity due to number 1 above. C • c • SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Building Type City Park ITE Land Use Code di i Independent Variable—Trips per Acre Average Number Average Size of Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of Independent Rate Rate Rate Coefficient Studies Variable/Study Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 6.0 8.0 1.0 3 2.0 • Peak A.M. Enter •• Hour Between Exit of 7 and 9 Total Adjacent P.M. Enter • Street • Between Exit Traffic 4 and 6 Total Peak A.M. Enter Hour Exit of Total Generator P.M. Enter Exit Total Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Enter Hour of Exit' Generator Total Source Numbers 13 . 18 ITE Technical Committee 6A-6—Trip Generation Rates Date: Rev. 1979 • CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON 4174/D/ 5 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: April 10, 1989 DATE SUBMITTED: April 6, 1989 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Proclaim PREVIOUS ACTION: None April 23-29, 1989 National _ Consumers Week PREPARED BY: Marcha K. Hunt DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN 0 REQUESTED BY: Consumers Week Chair PO ICY ISSUE Nationally, Consumers Week is celebrated April 23-29. INFORMATION SUMMARY The U. S. Office of Consumer Affairs coordinates the observance of National Consumers Week, the week set aside to create an awareness of the importance of the consumer in the economy, to encourage an examination of consumer problems, and to offer an occasion for organizations to highlight their new and existing consumer programs. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1 . Deny the request. 2. Amend the proclamation. 3. Proclaim National Consumers Week as submitted. FISCAL IMPACT None. SUGGESTED ACTION Proclaim National Consumers Week April 23-29, 1989. mh9533D C cr---------1`— t � $g Yl � y�� 3u kd i�<lggc '1� 'i '�flff oil t '� ny L�i • '1/41.51,Z04.k" pigi c iifr, s �%O 4 k v-.�'3a IN IM-ty; (fit , ,,.� o-71,-n:: c�, .. �-r , ,_„ li. = ! i ; " ) NATIONAL CONSUMERS WEEK 1989 PROCLAMATION n-14--•... i w' 1 WHEREAS, the week beginning April 23, Nineteen Hundred C.--t--,1......., :h,, and Eighty-Nine is the eighth annual National Consumers Week; ,•,: M . and 1:,,,,,,,,,),, ,, ,-.4,1V-4,,- ) WHEREAS, the 1989 theme "Consumers Open Markets" ',-,/,10 '' 77 7tt acknowledges the powerful role consumers play in our nation's • LI economy; and S/Jt;;1\ u, '''a, WHEREAS, c major function of our competitive free market y. 4ty;... ��,,,�� 1 system is to satisfy consumer demand; and i'''-'' 1 _•�Y4 r;di` WHEREAS, consumers should have certain rights in these ti>ti I 5 ?..4, � markets including the right to information, choice, safety, i'',74Q� education, and to be heard; and ', i WHEREAS, ideal fairness for the consumer is achieved when -. „h = educators, business, government, and consumers work together to Ell 1C`',f insure equity, increased competition, and safet in our free _ 'iiL 3' ` market economy; and �= S� • s- WHEREAS, National Consumers Week promotes consumer ( �, =� programs by both the public and private sector; encourages -P " ' I -"" dialogue between consumers, business, and governments; and 1 -� 1 Wit .:: . ;f - i- ,,..�; broadens the scope of consumer awareness. r16 NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald R. Edwards, Mayor of Tigard do tk-;;,6�' �1 hereby designate the week of April 23, 1989, in the City of /(' • r Tigard, as Consumers Week. ' tt43,,,wn 27 auk', \`,--,•1��i:_. mmvr c� Gerald R. Edwards, Mayor ��/r City of Tigard �,�• „)` 3t",: § ei; Attest: \: m 1 t� LC7.t1)C'iGvLf It: ,V'>(ate . tom. 1 Deputy Ci YRecorder, City of Tigard v f!^ '' ' to v , CS _ ro �. .o Nom./�G.a..'t vt�'t _:h t v,l I• ; ill �. C I is; ice >.' G ;t_ ti ii,t, ,3i t tit ., r-�' , y „, '' -4;r1,._ lltt q uh . �.: '�l� s is„w+-ftg ,;yi ,r - , •.esti ,J7k,:•”�� en ".,- .. — 0, Jx% .,. „r ,,.4.•.;m , . Pit/le-rI::,,10 .,\.. 'ir11,.,,1.�" ,s,tr-1!..,_ ......,. ..,, .. 7 7 7 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council March 30, 1989 FROM: Patrick J. Reilly, City Administrator SUBJECT: COUNCIL CALENDAR, Apr.-Dec. 1989 Official Council meetings are marked with an asterisk (*). If generally OK, we can proceed and make specific adjustments in the Monthly Council Calendars. Please note Budget Committee meetings. April '89 1, Sat Tigard Water District Grand Opening *3, Mon Joint King City/Tigard Council Meeting (Elmer's, 6:30 pm) *10, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) *17, Mon Council Study Session (6:30) 19, Wed Legislative Breakfast (Eggs & Issues, Elmer's, 7:15 am) *24, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) *25, Tues Budget Committee (Town Hall Conf. Rm. , 7:00 pm) 26, Wed Water District Quarterly Meeting (Town Hall Room, 12:00 Noon) May '89 *2, Tues Budget Committee (THCR, 7:00 pm) 5, Fri Chamber First Niter *8, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) *9, Tues Budget Committee (THCR, 7:00 pm) 14, Sun Mother's Day *15, Men Council Study Session (6:30) 16, Tues May Special Election *16, Tues Budget Committee (THCR, 7:00 pm) 17, Wed Legislative Breakfast (Eggs & Issues, Elmer's, 7:15 am) 18, Thurs Boards & Committee Chairs (THCR, 7:00 pm) *22, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) *23, Tues Budget Committee - if necessary (THCR, 7:00 pm) 24, Wed Tigard Public Library 25th Birthday Party (Library, 4-5 pm) 29, Mon Memorial Day *31, Wed Volunteer Banquet (Fowler Jr. Hi, 6:30 pm) June '89 2, Fri Budget summary to Times (publish 6/8) 9, Fri Second notice ad to Times (publish 6/15) *12, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) (Budget Hearing adoption) Council Calendar - Page 1 June '89, cont. 14, Wed Flag Day 14, Wed Legislative Breakfast (Eggs & Issues, Elmer's, 7:15 am) *19, Mon Council Study Session (6:30) *26, Mon Council Business Agenda - Budget Hearing & Adoption (6:30/7:30) July '89 4, Tues Independence Day (City Hall Closed) *10, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) *17, Mon Council Study AGenda (6:30) 19, Wed Legislative Breakfast (Eggs & Issues, Elmer's, 7:15 am) 22, Sat Cruisin' Tigard *24, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) August '89 *14, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) 16, Wed Legislative Breakfast (Eggs & Issues, Elmer's, 7:15 am) *21, Mon Council Study Agenda (6:30/7:30) *28, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) September '89 4, Mon Labor Day (City Hall Closed) *11, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) *18, Mon Council Study Agenda (6:30) 20, Wed Legislative Breakfast (Eggs & Issues, Elmer's, 7:15 am) 24-28, Sat-Thurs ICMA Conference *25, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) October '89 *9, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) * Council Study AGenda (6:30) 18, Wed Legislative Breakfast (Eggs & Issues, Elmer's, 7:15 am) *23, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) 31, Tues Halloween November '89 *13, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) 15, Wed Legislative Breakfast (Eggs & Issues, Elmer's, 7:15 am) *20, Mon Council Study Agenda (6:30) 23-24, Thurs-Fri Thanksgiving Holiday *27, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) December '89 *11, Mon Council Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) *18, MonCouncil Business Agenda (6:30/7:30) 20, Wed Legislative Breakfast (Eggs & Issues, Elmer's, 7:15 am) 25, Mon Christmas Holiday mhO028a Council Calendar - Page 2 7 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Pat Reilly, City Administrator Respond By FROM: Wayne Lowry, Finance Director /"/ For Your Information DATE: March 23, 1989 Signrand Return SUBJECT: Review of Waste Haulers Annual Reports The Utility and Franchise Committee met on Tuesday, March 21, 1989, to discuss and review the financial reports submitted by the solid waste haulers for the year ending December 31, 1988. Tigard Municipal Code Section 11 .04 requires the Committee to review the reports and to report back to the City Council by April 1, on whether or not the results of the evaluation of the reports requires an adjustment to the garbage rates charged to Tigard citizens. In August of 1987, the Council approved a procedure to be followed in reviewing the reports. The procedure allows for an adjustment to the garbage rates if the aggregate profit percentage of the haulers is less than 8 percent or greater than 12 percent. Upon review of the annual reports, the Utility and Franchise Committee found the profit percentage of the solid waste haulers to be within the limits set forth in the procedure, and therefore, recommends that no adjustment be made to the garbage rates charged within the city of Tigard. I believe that passing this memo on to the City Council will meet the reporting requirements of the TMC. ke/9366D MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON 0� I e TO: Pat Reilly, City Administrator 22 FROM: Ed Murphy, Director of Community Developme ��, 1'14 DATE: March 31, 1989 SUBJECT: Traffic Study for the "Diamond" Area A few weeks ago, the City Council asked the staff for a report on the status of conducting a traffic study for the area commonly referred to as the Tigard "Diamond" area, which is the area bounded by Highway 217 and Hall Boulevard. About nine or ten months ago, there was a proposal to complete a traffic analysis of this area, sharing in the costs of that analysis would be among three parties - the City, Trammell-Crow, and Windmar. I have recently spoken to David Blake, representing the Trammell-Crow Company, and Jack Reardon, representing Windmar about the study. Windmar has already conducted the first phase of the traffic analysis in the area surrounding Washington Square, and is now conducting the second phase of the study. They may be interested in participating in the larger study, and will let me know in the near future. Trammell-Crow is still interested in participating in the study, and is ready to have that study started at any time. The next steps in the process would be as follows: 1. I will wait to receive verbal confirmation from Windmar that they are interested in participating in the traffic study. 2. The City Engineer will draft a scope of work relating to this study and estimate the potential cost of that study. 3. I will send a copy of the proposed scope of work to Trammell-Crow and Windmar for their review and acceptance. 4. The proposed agreement, the scope of work, and cost implications shall be reviewed by the City Council at that point, prior to your signing the agreement or the City's advertisement for proposals from consulting firms. 5. The City Engineer will then develop a request for proposals, advertise, and select a firm to recommend to the City Council. Hopefully by the City Council meeting on April 10, I will have more information on this matter. ke/9489D c: Randy Wooley, City Engineer 3 . 3 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: 4/10/89 DATE SUBMITTED: 3/30/89 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Grabhorn PREVIOUS ACTION: Council approval (Centron) SDR 88-25, MLP 88-16, ! subject to conditions and V 88-39; Consent agenda item % ,J , for Council I= iew //A/ PREPARED BY: Keith Liden DEPT HEAD O'jrf CITY ADMIN OK j// l/ REQUESTED BY: POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY On March 27, 1989, the Council approved the above applications subject to conditions and directed staff to prepare a final order. The attached resolution has been prepared to reflect the Council's motion on this matter. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the attached resolution 2. Modify and approve the attached resolution FISCAL IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION Approve the resolution � L]�, CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: April 10, 1989 DATE SUBMITTED: _Parch 20, 1989 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Resolution_ PREVIOUS ACTION: accepting Mara Woods Subdivision public improve `;- is ,/, PARED BY: Engineering Division DEPT. HEAD OK /0‘ CITY ADMIN 0 J'/L/ 'EQUESTED BY: Community Development ' PO I Y ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY 1. Mara Woods subdivision is located at the intersection of SW Bonita Road and SW 79th Ave. (see attached map). 2. All public improvements have now been satisfactorily completed and have withstood the required one year maintenance guarantee period. 3. The Engineering Division certifies that the improvement is now acceptable and that all requirements have been met. 4. Therefore, it is recommended that (in accordance with the terms of the project agreement) the City Council accept the public improvements, namely - street, sanitary and storm sewer system and streetlighting for City operation and maintenance responsibility and, further, that the Council authorize release of the assurance bond. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED None; the (City-Developer) project agreement specified City acceptance upon satisfactory completion of all City requirements. FISCAL IMPACT 1. City assumption of responsibility for operation and maintenance of the public improvements specified above. SUGGESTED ACTION Pass the Resolution titled: "A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS KNOWN AS MARA WOODS SUBDIVISION PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS." jh-mara.jh 3 . 5 n CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON A (0 COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: "frt -Q,-1 9 D•TE SUBMITTED: March 30, 1989 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: GSA Contract/7 �'REVIOUS ACTION: Contract Approved on .• September 12, 1988 (�f j jf PREPARED BY: Elizabeth Ann Newton a DEPT HEAD 0 ntiA CITY ADMIN 9K1Af REQUESTED BY: s Pc ICY ISSUE Should the City reimburse the Cit Center Design consultant for costs incurred over the "Not to Exceed" contract :mount? INFORMATION SUMMARY On September 12, 1988, the City entered into a contract with GSA for a design plan for the City Center planning effort. The contract was for a sum not to exceed $20,000. GSA has incurred costs above the contract amount and has asked the City to reimburse the firm for some of those costs. Staff has reviewed the request and the contract, and can support reimbursing GSA for additional meetings not anticipated in the contract at a cost of $1,72.1.25. In addition, GSA constructed a model of the design concept at a cost of $4,020. Although not authorized under the contract, or by the staff, the City Center Plan Task Force did use the model at several public presentations. For that reason, staff could support reimbursing GSA $2,000.00 for the model. Should Council agree to compensate GSA the $3,721.25 recommended by staff, there are unencumbered funds in the Planning Division's contractual services account. Attached is a resolution which if approved, would authorize the City Attorney to reimburse GSA. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Direct staff not to reimburse GSA for any expenditures over the $20,000 contract amount. 2. Direct staff to reimburse GSA $1,721.25 for meetings attended outside the contract scope. 3. Direct staff to reimburse GSA $3,721.25; $1,721.25 for meetings and $2,000 for the model. FISCAL IMPACT The funds to be reimbursed could be paid out of the Planning Division's contractural services account. $7,000 in that account for special area studies remains unencumbered. SUGGESTED ACTION Approve the attached resolution. dj/9477D CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON 7-;7 f RESOLUTION NO. 89- A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO REIMBURSE GSA FOR EXPENSES INCURRED BEYOND THE CONTRACT AMOUNT FOR THE CITY CENTER DESIGN PLAN. WHEREAS, the City entered into a contract with GSA to prepare a Design Plan for the city center study area; and WHEREAS, the contract was for a sum not to exceed $20,000; and WHEREAS, GSA has incurred costs above the contract amount not anticipated in the contract;and WHEREAS, there are unencumbered funds available in the Planning Division's contractural services account. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City council that: Section 1: The City Administrator is hereby authorized to reimburse GSA the sum of $3,721.25 for expenses incurred beyond the contract amount. Section 2: The City Administrator is further directed to pay the amount to be reimbursed from the Planning Division's contractural services account. PASSED: This day of , 1989. ATTEST: Mayor - City of Tigard Deputy Recorder - City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 89- Page 1 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY apri l 10 AGENDA OF: M--a% 37. 1989 DATE SUBMITTED: March 17, 1989 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Appeal of PREVIOUS ACTION: None Director's Interpretation -- Use ('• Classification of Laser - Techni•=1/ REPARED BY: Jerry Of fey, Asst. Planner Instruments c. AV / V DEPT HEAD 0:74.\ CITY ADMIN OKII/ QUESTED BY: Ed Murphy, Comm. Dev. Dir. �- I,' POLICY ISSUE An appeal has been filed requesting the Council overturn a Community Development Director's interpretation that the operations of Laser-Technical Instruments, Inc. are to be considered 'manufacturing of finished products" for purposes of determining zoning districts which will allow the use. The business combines commercial and industrial aspects of producing and marketing precision marking instruments. The appellants request that the business be found to be a commercial use. INFORMATION SUMMARY On March 8, 1989, the Community Development Director issued an interpretation that the operations of Laser-Technical Instruments, Inc. are to be considered "manufacturing of finished products" for purposes of determining which zoning districts will permit the business. "Manufacturing of finished products" is a permitted use in the I-P (Industrial Park), I-L (Light Industrial), and I-H (Heavy Industrial) zoning districts. Laser-Technical Instruments, Inc. on March 14, 1989, filed an appeal of the Director's Interpretation. The appellants request that the Council find that the "manufacturing of finished products" component of their business is subordinate to the "business equipment sales and service", "research services, and "professional and administrative services" components of the business which also would occur at the same site. These latter use classifications are permitted uses in several commercial zoning districts. Laser-Technical Instruments Inc. have submitted a letter dated January 31, 1989, providing details on the operating characteristics of their business and the appeal request dated March 14, 1989, providing additional information. Lacer-Technical Instruments, Inc. is a Lake Oswego, firm which seeks to relocate to Tigard. The firm has interest in a potential relocation site which is zoned C-P (Professional Commercial). ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Affirm the Director's Interpretation that the operations of Laser- Technical Instruments Inc. constitute an industrial use with associated commercial aspects subordinate to the "manufacturing of finished products" aspect of the business. 2. Reverse the Director's Interpretation regarding Laser-Technical N,.. Instruments, Inc. and issue a Council determination that the operations of this business fall within a commercial use classification of the Community Development Code and that the "manufacturing of finished products" component of the business are subordinate to the commercial aspects of the business. FISCAL IMPACT None SUGGESTED ACTION Affirm the Director's Interpretation regarding Laser-Technical Instruments, Inc. dj/LASER.JO C C McCLURE 8 SCHWAB ATTORNEYS AT LAW 9250 S.W.TIGARD AVENUE CIIHARLE5 J.MCCLURE TIGARD,OREGON 97223 FAX(503)639-3447 JOHN E.SCHWAB TELEPHONE(503)639-4108 March 14, 1989 Mayor and City Council City of Tigard 13125 S. W. Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: C. Melvin Bliven Dear Mayor and Council Members : This office represents C. Melvin Blevin, President of Laser- Technical Instruments, Inc. Mr. Blevin has signed an earnest money agreement to purchase property at 7580 S. W. Hunziker Road and wants to relocate his business there. The property is zoned C-P (Professional/Administrative Office - Commercial District). In a Director's Interpretation Letter dated March 8, 1989 , the Community Development Director has made an interpretation that my client's business must be considered a "manufacturer of finished products" and that it is not a permitted or conditional use in the C-P zone. We appeal. LTI's principal product is the Laser Blazer, a precision marking device used primarily in the lumber milling business. The company is expanding its laser technology into other areas, such as light show systems for night clubs. This is a small business. All administr.a ive, sales, product repair and service, research and development, testing and final assembly functions are currently done in a small house near Kruse Way. All these things are proposed to be done at the Tigard location, with the addition of a sales display room for the company' s products. Although the final assembly comprises only about 15% of the floor area of the current operation and only about one-third of all labor hours, the director has determined that LTI's operation must be classified as the "manufacturing of finished products" and is not allowed at the proposed site. MCCLU RE 8 SCHWAB ATTORNEYS AT LAW Mayor and City Council March 14, 1989 Page Two The Community Developement Code defines "manufacturing of finished products" as: ". . .the manufacturing of finished products from a previously prepared materials (excluding raw materials) ." 18 .42.020 (d) (1) (A) . That does define LTI's process. All components are manufactured elsewhere and final assembly is hand assembly; literally using screwdrivers and allen wrenches. There are no toxic chemicals, no soldering, no fumes , no noise and no discernible impact on the surrounding neighborhood. The final assembly is such a small portion of LTI's business that it should be seen as incidental to "business equipment sales and services", "professional and administrative services" , or "research services" all of which describe LTI's business more accurately and all of which are outrightly permitted in the zone. The director classifies LTI's activity as light industrial because that is the most intense of the several uses of the property. The definition of "manufacturing of finished products" quoted above could include many activities, such as an optometrist assembling a pair of glasses or the assembly of computer components into a system by a computer consultant. Both these businesses would be permitted in the zone at issue, because the assembly activities are incidental to the real business of the optometrist or the computer consultant. Also, the activiLies of one assembling pairs of glasses or computer systems or bicycles or putting gems into ring settings have such little impact on the neighborhood there is no public policy reason to classify them as industrial uses. The present situation is no different from the decision this council made in 1986. At that time the former director interpreted the Code to prevent Magno-Humphries from processing C McCLU RE 8 SCHWAB ATTORNEYS AT LAW C Mayor and City Council March 14, 1989 Page Three and distributing vitamin tablets in the CBD zone. This council decided vitamin production was secondary to warehousing as a use of the property and that predominant use of the property was allowed in the CBD zone as a conditional use. Here the situation is similar. The assembly is an incidental use of the property and will have virtually no impact on surrounding property owners. The predominant uses of the property will be the sales and service of the products, including a showroom, and the research and development and administrative functions that support sales. The council should determine that, on the whole, LTI's business activity can better be described as "business equipment sales and services" and that it is outrightly permitted in the C-P Zone. Sincerely, McCLURE & SCHWAB / eLU-42 • n E.4tSchwab JES/sw S.14 cc: C. Melvin Bliven C 441 March 8, 1989 CITY OF WARD C. Melvin Bliven ��►, Kim Cope y 2.•©:V Laser-Technical Instruments, Inc. PO Box 1609 5880 SW Meadows Rd. Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Re: Director's Interpretation - Use Classification of the Functions of Laser- Technical Instruments, Inc. Gentlemen: I have reviewed your letter of January 31, 1989, asking into which use classification of the City of Tigard Community Development Code the operations of Laser-Technical Instruments, Inc. fall. The purpose of your request is to identify which City of Tigard zoning designations would allow your business as a permitted or conditional use. Our understanding is that Laser-Technical Instruments, Inc., assembles previously manufactured components into a precision marking device used primarily in the lumber milling industry and markets this product directly to end users. Less than one third of the labor hours of your present staff is involved in the assembly of your products. Less than 20 percent of the gross floor area of your current operation is devoted to assembly of your products and storage of unassembled components and finished products. The balance of both the labor hours and the gross floor area of your current operations are devoted to research and development, sales, service, and administrative office functions of the business. The relative proportions of the varied functions of the business are anticipated to remain relatively constant through relocation and future expansions of the business. Planning Division staff have visited your current business location and noted that the exterior appearance of the business' operation is typical of office and research activities occurring in a former single family residence. Laser-Technical Instruments' operations include several functions described by the use classification definitions of the Tigard Community Development Code. Tigard utilizes a traditional zoning method by which land uses are segregated (or combined) by function. This method is used rather than the performance zoning method by which individual uses seeking to locate in a particular location are evaluated individually against performance standards in an attempt to minimize conflicts between neighboring individual uses. The assembly componr!,:t of your operations falls under the Tigard Code's "manufacturing of finished products" functional use classification. This is an industrial use classification. The sales and administrative office functions of you business fall within the "professional and administrative services" use classification. This is considered primarily a commercial function. Because direct sales of your product are not occurring at your business location, we are unable to conclude that any part of your operations are "retail sales" or "business equipment sales and services" for zoning purposes. In the case of a 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,P.O.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 t- Page 2 business which combines functional uses, the City of Tigard categorizes the individual use or business by the most intensive functional use classification. This is done is order to segregate uses by their potential for impacts upon the neighborhood. Typically, industrial uses are considered to be the most intensive uses. We conclude that because of the assembly component of Laser-Technical Instruments, Inc., your business must be considered a "manufacturer of finished products" for purposes of determining the appropriate zoning designation. "Manufacturing of finished products" is a permitted use in the I-P (Industrial Park), I-L (Light Industrial), and I-H (Heavy Industrial) zones. "Manufacturing of finished products" is not a permitted use or conditionally permitted use in any of Tigard's commercial zones. The Planning Division staff is available to help you identify available cites within the I-P, I-L, or I-H zones that may be suitable for your use and to describe applicable development standards and procedures necessary to establish a new business in the City of Tigard. Please contact us if we can be of assistance. We apologize for the delay in issuing this formal response to your request for a Director's Interpretation. Your request raised policy issues which necessitated that the staff fully consider all implications of this interpretation. A Director's interpretation can establish a precedent that may affect later similar requests. This interpretation may be appealed to the City Council if a written request, justification, and a $50.00 fee are submitted. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sinc rely, App oved by, Keith Liden d Mur., y Senior Planner Community De elopment Director cc: Director's Interpretation File Jerry Offer dj/LASER-TE.JO 4 I,ASER.TECHNICAL INSTRUMENTS,INC. �a 5880 S.W.Meadows Road P.O.Box 1609 Lake Oswego,Oregon 97034 503/620-2300 January 31. 1989 Planning Commission City of Tigard, Oregon Civic Center/City Hall 13125 S. W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Gentlemen: We are making written request for your consideration to allow our Company to operate within a commercial or residential zone in the City of Tigard. In the true meaning of your written definition (Zone matrix-Page 7-R 6-86) , Laser-Technical Instruments is a "manufacturer" , as we do produce a finished product. However, our "manufacturing" consists of nothing more than assembly of small components purchased elsewhere. This assembly procedure involves less than 15% of our labor/time involvement. L.T. I . 's final product is marketed only to businesses. Our number r one priority, obviously, is the sale of our product, and number two, is service of the same. The loading and unloading portion our sales and service consists of one A.M. delivery and one P.M. pick- up by United Parcel Service. For the past twelve years, L.T. I . has purposely maintained a low key business profile from a private residence in Lake Oswego. Development of our current site forces us to relocate. It is our desire to move into the Tigard area, again continuing to maintain the low business profile of our Company, as well as be in a position to upgrade our professional appearance. We are optimistic that after considering the facts in this letter, our comments during our discussion, and the presentation of our component assembly, your Committee will reach the conclusion that L.T. I . does not fit the "manufacturing" definition, and can grant us permission to locate in a residential or commercial zone. We thank you in advance for your consideration, and await your decision. Very truly yours _. C. Melvin Bliven President C ! L. 1^ .**.•‘' _""4"- -1.*.. yes.✓��;. ,, - 7.�' ■'d' - , AER BLE3®_ . _ T ; _ . ._ . . . . . . . . . .. . • • . . • .. • . . . .,. , _, _ . ._ . . .,. _ . , I -•..2_ .. . •, , • . - .•. .. —..,. „. — . .. . .•. • • ...-.• r., c s__....•. ..__•__,. .'.... • ._...'._ ..•,...." .. ' _• . Yield .Fr roin. ... . iMcreases .: .. • od Stock ::1' 0%0 : Or More,,..• ! _._.p .•.'` .- , • . . . . . . . . ----„ ,=,..........7.._,..,7_,. .„.„„.,..,.,...?... ___,-.____--......------ _.. -----I------------ -__r_.____I 4 i / \ Z. 1 ..1' . 4. io.11.21t;":—.,.,"7-.......z.---''''--(..- ------ -,.„4,--....-.--..w- PP:7---: ::-: // mo - te ` y ✓ow, ,_.,:„.....„...,...5„..;„:,_ ,..rr . : r �,,-„'�.. all' ' Vfr1t i.-;-°7",,1,,...::-',!- -- ” ` i'% WO' ✓ y- IIIIIII -,------'--.2"- ---------P' "/�PululWl ' i� � EiOIIIPPIPP- llp" 11 i -----.. ... ./ lUIIlUl 'II ' --4,-..),.,-....- xr� lilllli� __" • Ulll � ,, a�� y _• . IIIIIi IIll ...---.:-.-"'—.-?..'4,. . l UUIUIII UI ;`� � DIIIU _ 1 ; j . sow . BLAZER ® . LINEMAKER. Increase Yield From High Cost Wood Stock By 10% or More! With The LASER BLAZER System for Fast,Accurate Sawing r Adding a LASER BLAZER linemaker to any saw a highly visible line extending to both ends of a board of operation can result in lumber savings averaging a half- any workable length. With the laser line centered on and inch or more per cut. The cumulative effect is substantial. parallel to the saw tai'de, the operator feeds the work For this reason alone, many users of LASER BLAZER accurately for cutting with maximum recovery. linemakers report they have paid for the equipment in less For gang ripping, two, three or more LASER BLAZER than two months. From there on, through years of linemakers may be mounted in a cluster, spaced in their service, the LASER BLAZER installation is pure profit. brackets to project parallel lines centered on the same The LASER BLAZER linemaker is a precision number of saw blades. The saw operator chooses the instrument, yet rugged and dependable. It can be mounted optimum board area for maximum clear cuts, then feeds on a simple, L-shaped extension arm attached to the saw the work by following the bright red lines. On a single- table or fastened to the floor. When in place with its blade saw, a cluster of linemakers can save material by mounting bracket, it adjusts quickly and easily to project indicating the best choice of succeeding cuts. Typical LASER BLAZER linemaker mounting,on an L-shaped extension E_ —. ._.. arm, allows projection of a sharp, m "=''_- red line for selective free-saw cutting. . test'_ ae—�1-i:'SF' / ` / \ ->-,—.. �.--' i a; +yFf� i0't�' t.,am / o xi- - 3 :. UI / / Sys" LU1I II!d."1 tZ T' "}1�1 i.1.:71,44 f '----: I IUIU IIUIIU �r ii.}4Yy ` I 4 ��'' !��IIIIII-�c'[�".��Grs--i,*.t.,: L;v-' Lx"w . z.•u , % , t 1101 Maw • Illb' , , — �-0 � i s. I .` • ' . ' - - .( s • , 111101116 With the Linemaker in the same position, f' ree-saw r a 1 I cress>utting becomes accurate and waste-free. r''' --/ i 1 / / --_____7- a / An ideal application for the Laser Blazer linemaker is the initial trim on straight line,chain feed rip saws. Three LASER BLAZER linemaker Models Simplify Installation 46%07 1 /\ / 11 � � \ / \ / 77 Right angle projection,line perpendicular to housing axis // . . \ 77A Line projected from end of housing \ / 11°i� - A choice of Laser Blazer linemaker models, with the �' mounting bracket, makes installation quick and easy. s� With the linemaker in its bracket fastened to a wall, ceil- ing or extension arm, the bright red laser line can be repo- sitioned or extended for varying stock lengths in a matter 77B Right angle projection,line parallel to housing axis of minutes. (See back page for suggested mounting systems.) Other models available for OEM equipment or special application. LASER BLAZER Mounting Bracket • _ IASER-BLAZER° o 1; /ASE/4BLALZ Ar ' • This bracket is fastened to any stable surface with screws or bolts.It holds the LASER BLAZER linemaker firmly in position.Set- screw adjustments permit movement of the linemaker laterally,or rotated to aim the laser line for maximum visibility and sharpness over the entire length of the boards to be sawed. Typical Do-It-Yourself Mounting Systems Using the LASER BLAZER mounting bracket,installation of one or metal,and fastened to the saw frame or to the floor near the saw.The more LASER BLAZER linemakers is quickly and easily handled"in house" mounting bracket is attached to the arm above the saw and the LASER with readily available materials.An L-shaped arm is constructed of wood or BLAZER linemaker inserted. 9 MpeV3as .xppasemes1van Call us for technical advice anytime.Our research department is ready to work with you to meet your T--__ I special needs. -- _ Specifications �'l _[ -- - Voltage:Standard: 115V AC,50/60 Hz.230V AC and 12V DC on special order at no extra charge. Other voltages also available. Power Output: 5 milliwatts, pure red light. Light Source: Helium-Neon Laser. Power Consumption: Less than 50 watts. Side View Front View Diameter:2.25 inches(57.15mm). Model Floor or saw table mounting,with L-frame positioned to put Length:24.5 inches(622.3mm). 77 linemaker above and behind saw. Weight:6.5 lbs. (2.95kg). Fan Angle:90 degree fan angle standard.Other fan angles on special order at no extra charge. MOUNTING BRACKET Length: 18.3 inches(464.82mm). _ Width: 3 inches(76.2mm). I _ --... Height: 3.6 inches(91.44mm). / [===I r-./ ----_ Warranty LASER-TECHNICAL INSTRUMENTS, INC. products are warranted against defects for a period of 15 months from date of delivery(for full war- ranty statement,refer to Operating and Maintenance - -' manual). Side View Front View Repair Service Model With the laser line projected from the end of the housing, WE REPAIR ALL MAKES OF LASER LINE- 77A mounting can be on L-frame,ceiling or wall. MAKERS. Factory repair service is fast-turnaround, low in cost,and offers 15-month warranty on repairs. ■ e Safety .' -\ ; All LASER BLAZER products conform to the �' - 1 regulations of the Bureau of Radiological Health, the U.S.Government agency which controls the use .----i , of s ;afiCanadian Electrical Codlae ersby the nd CanareadiancertiStandardsedto Association. r' ellp!› 1 ` t t I Side View Front View Model With the line projected parallel to the linemaker,the area over `I I!'% 77B the saw blade is clear of obstructions. 7 ASER BLAZER° Sales, Development, & Manufacturing by ( monfrimi� �� LASER•TECHNICAL INSTRUMENTS,INC. P.O.Box 1609•5880 S.W.Meadows Road Lake Oswego,OR 97035•(503)620-2300 SWw 5-87 SM PRINTED U.S.A. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON elp L. _COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY �, y tolP�+ AGENDA OF: war----- Cv3 DATE SUBMITTED: March 17, 1989 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Proposed ' REVIOUS ACTION: PacTrust LID {1 / REPARED BY: Randall R. Woole DEPT HEAD ..Ak CITY ADMIN OK / ii QUESTED BY: • 1 POL Y ISSU ' Consideration of a petition stating interest in forming a local improvement district for street and utility improvements in the area of proposed PacTrust development. INFORMATION SUMMARY A petition has been received for formation of an LID for construction of roads and utilities in the area of the proposed PacTrust development between Bonita Road' and Upper Boones Ferry Road (Carmen Drive). In accordance with City Code, the staff has prepared a Preliminary Evaluation Report and a copy is attached. The Council has previously reviewed this LID proposal in workshop meetings. The proposed LID appears to be feasible. In order for consideration of the LID to continue, it is necessary for the Council to formally direct that a preliminary engineer's report be prepared. • After the preliminary engineer's report is completed, a hearing can be set to consider actual formation of an LID. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED TMC 13.04:020(b) (2) provides that: (2) Based on the preliminary evaluation report, the Council shall: (A) Direct staff to terminate the work on the proposed district and improvement; or (B) Adopt a resolution directing staff to prepare a preliminary engineer's report. • • FISCAL IMPACT All costs of preparing the preliminary engineer's report will be paid by PacTrust and may be included in the LID if it is formed. SUGGESTED ACTION Adoption of the attached resolution directing that a Preliminary Engineer's Report be prepared. dj/PACTRUST.RW ff� • Preliminary Evaluation Report PacTrust LID Attached is a petition from PacTrust Realty Inc. requesting consideration of formation of a Local Improvement District (LID) for construction of public street and utility improvements to serve the large industrial property which PacTrust proposes to develop in the area bounded by Bonita Road, 72nd Ave., Upper Boones Ferry Road (Carmen Drive), and I-5. The petition attachments which describe the general location and scope of the improvements have been previously reviewed with the Council in study sessions. It appears that the proposed LID would be a single-owner LID. Materials submitted by PacTrust and available within the Engineering Division files provide a preliminary indication that the LID would be in accordance with the Council policies for single-owner LIDs as expressed in Resolution Number 89-12. Mackenzie Engineering has prepared a traffic engineering report that investigated alternative street patterns to serve the large industrial PacTrusc parcels. Based on Mackenzie's report, it appears that it is in the public interest to provide for a roadway connection through the PacTrust property and extending from Upper Boones Ferry Road to Bonita Road. Any street alignment alternative which does not provide for a connection to Bonita Road would be expected to lead to unacceptable traffic problems in the vicinity of 72nd Avenue and Bonita Road upon full development of the PacTrust property in accordance with the existing zoning. Extension of a new roadway connection to Bonita Road involves properties which are not owned by PacTrust Development. It may be necessary for the City to exercise its legal authority for right-of-way acquisition in order to provide for the necessary road connection. Additional information submitted by Mackenzie Engineering indicates that public utility lines to serve the PacTrust development should also connect to existing utility lines in Bonita Road. In order to provide for efficient future maintenance of the public utility lines, it is desirable that the utility lines run within the right-of-way of the proposed roadway connection to Bonita Road. Based on the materials submitted by Mackenzie Engineering, it appears to be in the public interest to facilitate the construction of a roadway connection between Upper Boones Ferry Road and Bonita Road as one project, rather than as piecemeal construction as development occurs. The proposed project would allow for development of the PacTrust property in accordance with the existing zoning and Comprehensive Plan without overloading the surrounding street and utility systems. The reports submitted by Mackenzie Engineering are available for review in the files of the Engineering Division and have been previously discussed with the City Council in study sessions. Based on preliminary materials submitted by PacTrust Realty Inc. and Mackenzie Engineering, it appears that the proposed LID is feasible, is in accordance with Council policies, and is in the public C interest. However, prior to actual formation of an LID, it is necessary to have prepared a preliminary engineer's report providing better definition of • • the scope of the proposed improvements, the precise boundaries of the proposed distributing LID, a preliminary estimate of costs, and the proposed method for disa.a v the LID assessments. Per City Code, in order for this LID consideration to proceed to the next step, it is necessary for the.Counsncciil portto adopt a resolution directing staff to prepare a preliminary engineer Staff recommends that the preliminary engineer's report be prepared. dj/PACTRUST.RW THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL is ' City of Tigard County of Washington State of Oregon • PETITION STATING INTEREST IN THE FORMATION OF LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT We the undersigned request that the City of Tigard investigate the feasibility of forming a Local Improvement District (L.I.0.) to provide Public Improvements improvements that may service and benefit property owned by us. These public improvements include streets, sanitary sewers, storm sewers, water system, signals, curbs, sidewalks and other elated as hown.on the attached t ri l. reu^ etancsigning piilwe are only acknowledging an interest in receiving the benefits of the proposed improvement and are not committed to supporting any Local Improvement District that may be proposed as a result of the City's investigation. Property Description Name Address Telephone (Tax Lot & Map No.) Pacific Realty Associates, L.P. By PacTrust Realty, Inc. 111 S.M. 5th Ave., Suite 2950 Portland, OR 97204 503/224-6540 2 S 1 12 DO Tax Lot 100 is Ge ery� 3a •��`�� 2 S 1 12 DD Tax Lot 600 �< B ��iP�� 2 S 1 12 DA Tax Lot 100 SSP `ichard P. : on.' 2 S 1 12 DA Tax Lot 101 ice President 2 S 1 12 AD Tax Lot 800 ()tad- L,iusf",( LkfGt r,1_t-Ck,a b�1 r lir_DJ/3 - 1-1ADIN HONORABLE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND STAFF: MY NAME IS John E. Smets AND MY ADDRESS IS 6830 S.W. BONITA ROAD, TIGARD I WOULD LIKE TO THANK YOU FOR GIVING ME THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK TO THE WHAT I BELIEVE ARE/INACCURACIES AND MISREPRESENTATION I REFERRED TO AT THE MARCH 27th MEETING. FIRST OF ALL THE JANUARY 31st picture in the Oregonian SHOWING THE PACTRUST DEVELOPMENT WITH A ROAD ALL THE WAY TO BONITA ROAD FROM CARMAN ROAD IS A GROSS MISREPRESENTATION IN THAT PACTRUST DOES NOT OWN THE 443 FEET BETWEEN BONITA ROAD AND THE PACTRUST PROPERTY. IN FACT, THEY HAVE NEVER MADE AN OFFER TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTY THEY DEEM NECESSARY FOR ACCESSTO BONITA ROAD. THEY HAVE USED INTIMIDATING THREATS OF CONDEMNATION AND SUBTERFUGE IN TRYING TO GET THE CITY TO FORCE SMETS TO SELL AT PRICES THEY ARE UNWILLING TO PAY IN PRIVATE NEGOTIATION. THEY DID OFFER VERBALLY TO PURCHASE THE ENTIRE PROPERTY OR EVEN EXCHANGE FOR ANOTHER PROPERTY, BUT THE PRICE WAS SO LOW THAT IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE FOR US TO MOVE OUR BUSINESS AND DUPLICATE THE CONVENIENCE WE HAVE. WE ARE CLOSE TO OUR SUPPLIERS AND ARE IN AN EASY-TO-FIND, SAFE, ACCESSIBLE LOCATION. OUR BUSINESS IS STEADILY GROWING. WE NEED ALL OF WHAT WE HAVE WHICH WILL BUILD OUT TO 54000 SQUARE FEET. WE HOPE TO EMPLOY UP TO 25 IN OUR BUSINESS AND EXPECT TO LEASE SOME OF OUR PROPERTY TO OTHER EMPLOYERS UNTIL WE NEED THE SPACE. THE DISRUPTION AND RELOCATION OF OUR BUSINESS AT THIS TIME WOULD BE DISASTROUS, (PHONES, STATIONERY, ADVERTISING BROCHURES, ALL THE INFRASTRUCTURE OF A SIXTEEN YEAR INTERNATIONAL COMPANY) WERE YOU TO ENCOURAGE PACTRUST TO PUSH US OUT OF CUR HOME LOCATION. THAT IS WHAT THE COUNCIL'S APPROVAL OF THIS STUDY WILL SIGNAL. PACTRUST NOW HAS THREE ACCESSES (AND EXITS) TO THEIR PROPERTY. MR. HARTVICKSON ONCE MADE THE STATEMENT THAT IF WE DID NOT WANT TO SELL OUR PROPERTY THEY COULD PUT A CUL-DE-SAC ON THEIRS. PAGE 2 - Smets to Council and City of Tigard THE PICTURE IN THE OREGONIAN AND PACTRUST'S PUBLICISED PLAN SHOWS THAT C BOTH SMETCO AND GEVURTZ FURNITURE WOULD BE LANDLOCKED FROM A ROAD WHICH WAS ESTABLISHED BY THE STATE. BEFORE YOU AGAIN IS THE MODEL I PRESENTED AT THE LAST MEETING WHICH HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE NPO 5. When OUR DEVELOPMENT IS CONSTRUCTED WE BELIEVE IT WILL BE AN ATTRACTIVE GATEWAY TO TIGARD. THIS IS WHERE OUR HEADQUARTERS HAS TO BE. WE ARE ADDING ONTO OUR PRESENT SPACE AND HAVE RECEIVED OUR FOUNDATION PERMIT. OUR SITE PLAN WILL BE PRESENTED TO THE CITY SHORTLY. I WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST THAT YOU NOT MAKE A DECISION ON THIS MATTER THIS EVENING. THE STUDY OF THIS PROJECT PUTS A CLOUD ON OUR PLANS FOR EXPANSION AND THE VIABILITY OF OUR FIRM AS A PART OF THE TIGARD INDUSTRIAL COMMUNITY. EVEN IF THE CITY DID NOT PAY FOR THE STUDY, THE MERE STUDY OF THE IDEA OF PUTTING PACTRUST'S ROAD THOUGH OUR PROPERTY WILL HURT US IN THAT THE COUNCIL MAY BE PSYCHOLOGICALLY COMMITTED TO THE RESULTS. FAILING THAT, I REQUEST THAT THE PREPARATION OF THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEER' S REPORT EXCLUDE THE PORTION OF THE SMETS PROPERTY FOR ANY CONSIDERATION IN THE PACTRUST L.I .D. , NOW AND IN THE FUTURE. WE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO REPLY. John E.Smets PS We received an indirect invitation to meet with Mr. Peter Bechen of Pactrust today after 4 P.M. which was too late for us to accept. tr1 • ••••1' mr •••••-441 fr 1•A`11.• 'V. II • • . •.... •.. t., . ,. ..4-,,,K. ,,;.,., „ .... . • u eirt„-91,1,4 *.i1V4-11•1 tc.. ..• t .••• ,., ;•,, -., r".1 , ,,.. , I •4.... .1,)I. .t!--,-,'%.,••‘'.).4 0) -afl4"r'. -4' i•I'''''1,. '''...414!, :4i'F':A1114141fliqt4t"% j.we. / ' ''‘.‘ ..% . . q't .;,1 4,'•,I.p.';',....c` -‘)& .4if"ii`,..01p•i,Ill• en' CD03 ,•,,,--ea, •4•10114,1k4.11,-.•IV Nit3r,t). h...,. yi..i. -; • • .. • .. . .e.7 ', ' t '.61. ' .> ,.... i*'. •C•e• R.4'''...,. •.) liliT T'.'r4 ,, 4 /LI.,,,r. ' • 1 .4 : ...,,,,1, _..'7. 44/,..4 ' .4 I..14„ • : •hot 4i .. 2.%.4. lb..1t/T • 1,1 ". i• 1••• '. . . T 0.4.....Jr,11. Z, 4•:,.,,ti:., Ni,41:0,,..4,r.4,.. .. , fr-•:,.., ,..,-, ,pf, ., • . - 0 ,,, , .. -,•• . 0. --- a) , •4•1.0..61,..,_ktr,kraf 1;rit ..-413,,,.'114.,1.1,,,.44, ' r ' ..: - ;it • '•41e....1 '...-.J..;.re -s.', g el !ch-lirre. 41...4 . k,; . .,r,,!.. ..,....'• ,-• '''''. ; Cvatk .. tz• , • „ ,..„V.:4.+.,, ''.. I., 8 .- - ., ..., 1 ,...a • . 4.1 v • .4 ....r tr.., ,A;rrict, •.. as'•,.", ^i s_ >'' C • 4,1%,Lat-4,!'lt.• 4r..14.;•ret4'.^,,,)*,:i. :,' '''• • % Jo <CC . •,•fe ..;ifffiejl4f.,.,,list 1 • ..t, ‘,,t . ''%3.4•-• 733g . -", ,. . z k - cr.4.1:7-• -,.A4.•••• ...•• {.."•• ..: ' '-•1'1-'...;5--„ 4 -1•Ifite-•;)C.-.Zi-iil .1.;Z. 4•Al. 4/ 1 • . 6 -4:4- - M . ."4.* 4-'4 ,>•••:=';0"..i•-• -'' 7 = = --,;,-,40,-,-;:i:A.A1,6,3'r,,,t,"1:,...,, .,-• .: . . r ,i, .ese ..! . t... . shiir 0 .1 ta. 1h.,A%....1. . ',..b.i. . -1..., }",..:•',''0, 'e 4 Z •1,3....,#.1,r, ),-.,,s,.y, .;,_,,..,,Al,,4.1.8,1:-,;,,•• ii. ..i,i mr.,; .Z. •.• .•,/,• ,-r• A 6 sMe . ,, im , -4- , 340,4 ^‘!'s•4 ..p4.1'it'; 2 < " i'''' IVW C.,'..1% );$11 4;t4't 1 '?I 1.4P.. T ' I ' ,,,,,‘• Cr• u g;, „sr, 0 y,,1, •• • .. , .0.tts.4..5. .;-'7.;‘--.1••r *.1-4 If? >: 74• ' '1. , .. g-.,' . 'um, w ..„,„0.1,10,1p. .1 , ,.. -. i •-1k.-- ;I t.; . "'` •' --zA- r, -I. -!;:e.:.--il X 41 , A ci I "--g-4- - g • •••-• Th. • - • - ....4=-_-.1--„.-- < Ira* n, (.71;••••• "s ev.,:. _v., j- Cr-.V.--•••,-, -4•..;.1 rg••eji; ''Tj. • '•..3..4- ..."61"!;•1;11 - ....;••'.1# ..' q -1' - - '•;'''. •T ,1/ i 44 skArt, ' !,,i T;Tip.11,.....:4f.•,, 5.,;(- •,- - ,i1. , ...-4.1*•^-,,,,A1 1101.11. ,to.??...1 Fl...4t,.. tr•ft:CO 4, ,,..,,k;,;.., ,..,,,,IL, tu , „; . ;e, ,,,,,,,, tc, t k, ,:.,.., ; •-• .,.405601:•„Ii4 F-- -1;11:*;.4.i.;!-:,:•44.?Aw.'''''S,,I,,•44"4tillilitiak,i,,k vr•• ''''t,,,,,•4::-ffr IN- 1 5.' .! ' 11g1,P,-.A.•:'-•i'l"':', .4: : •Ir.'-itoi*..it;';' ''''.'.4'it 4k61' fil '4.7.•"Yell‘‘rk•41, • : V' *P k . C ifi. ,,,kotryk:t.,./avik...r: . '0.'ict ''''8' ...-U z r : '-pp 54clier,..! • "k. d''''''t ""-. P":"Tr..'1%?‘.-fat:14;:'1: ':';'t--' .:0"1•71'.7 4 E< UM." AL. il;! ,fP'..if,t;i4....41,Wr7iii '.,-.)...4'tf\.'t.-•;.;.;%.11- .41§I . itirire ''i.'..."',,,N,. ..d. 4' 'I.,. . 11"...•ett.,-1 mai il'S,.i.,,ek;04*•••ieS:111''ir..-vt ..t. Al;.4...f,-..:..id, ,'..,.i 8 • • • sjp yr:C:1, .,..4 :.1'...,,1.4:7,..:?, 1•41...;4.Zii., .... 4.,•;,. .---• *Al 0 0 '41111F-, --,....*' • ..4.- ,,r. 0...` 4‘. ull' 40(•••,7cs.I.. ,..,..fi.:-..04,..,......t.., . .."*. -, it7;1,,,e),...-....' 40 'i.,.:,,,,,,v-4 ,-"••s,,..-5. ,t,•;• ..",-.s. ci) •- -•-••ves•-'-.A.,-. % ,,,,„0 .4. --• -- • •• . tu ", ‘...• ..; 0.:•14.,,o. 4, 1.- •• ,.. ..- •, w 4 . .1 f/4rii;• :, ..0 •d . , /•:1:"%1'. ". 4 'i 4...:...;:- - 11,4 41P.: T.' ''' 'VNIt4..' '. i'' 4 ccs el) ; -....004.: ./.. .c.:..-,c,A).6. 1.4.., -73.1 ..,;:=.,i4: , %.: kv1-4.0. .t. , -1 , ,,, 4,, 1-.,, I . 0 gic2 -.. ,3.•'-1;et.4.1.,19 4,-•',I l'e.,..-• ",•••Ii,1•••• .s.,''.i'• i i--, '‘. ,..; 7 ,s't r • ',••4; ' a 1 a..- • . . *V LLI 1111111111111 •"#ritfl'f';"';$'''it4.';'..' ) 1C, * - k ...‘%•-44, r•abl'14'•- I 4 • it I. .. 1VT:411 % ,4 -11f. Ftrtys•:4 '?;' ' ''.•• • = Pit•,...0y*, 4, p „ , ,, ..,.-,.. 6 r 4.': 4 0 i . \MK 4, A f‘ ,i ibursi.., • 1,0 , • , ...," 1- (1% ..a*pc--,f.t., ,,,,..r)-.),‘ ,.s.:.• 1 ..k, . 11.-1 .1. . .. , ti• .w.• • ,:. ... P '. •• 1 . • 'qs;',./ya ,..,,,,,4.4 • •E.aitl,t :'•..: b. ''. .4 a.0 •46.1. 101 ‘1•;*e is.T.- ••1••V't , _Atli*, •• - ,' 4.1< 3-.1..,,t_,- - , ., , -... , .- -. • ‘...., i...76,4c.kive,c. . .r.gg ,1,..11 l'i... I.,.., ':•,c.i,.: . -, •eiri,,,,mar r...-:- •.;,%-tr4A4.11,e4•• '"•74,,..1 ileinig !iiii•afti.r,, 1;•,,•i•.,-!*'0# • .?".. . it-44:..r.4 , 1 ' i.t'112\ Ili •1 I E :,4 %, ....ft-, e., ..0.:...ir=r42...,. ..,:• . • ..,ip.•,.......,.,:k.,ii..,4.. •, *-,! .41. 7, , ji_;:ift• i , ..1 1 ‘ if.,! ,.:, i . : .-,(k,;.,......! .I. el...t, w4,14 ,.4K--t.= ril pliona i...ke,;v14,',,4 tAky.,,,.„4...,14; it,..- ,. .1fIL.,-11,4..;15. ' • . , !..,.. g -4,14-4e,-A,-,..„ .. ,•., 4 .niett i ...,,,, •44-1(. (I) - : ,,,triqer4p,'4111 I ,....,,..'i "7, ..-Ft1 •• •• ‘ I: 4-,::,• w t.,11.1'''..14:•..0 a04..u.i.%., . i-. .. ,. . t P . , , -4-4,• ••.•--...4 ....,,,- 2 ay ; k t.,,t, ..... i ' ". . ...;i Z t '1: 1 . ,ak..?„1-a 1,-11," ,. .1*" ... 44:4:,. .....,..,,,,4,.it.t4;•,(44:1;,,.. .,tr41;',..k. ..;,, .•74 •,:•. „ . ; 6- •c'-;.F,,,-- ' , c' 4••%...., t.,•••f ,...,,, • v.z 1...., , , • ., (1) 4:11) !'. tY,,,'''-i,..:',Nt;.!efiot:;.4:1•At4 1 ' .:41 r........c., .,.!: . I. jk 1: i-: , 11 r‘.-0.:,:.,:;ja i,' -.• - ,' -,'.... .... -,..4 , • • ..,ik:-.47,i,..A...4.0*,,,,•,.< 7.,:s•Al ki,,T, t'..P.4.•'•' ••‘.0 d. I .."4„k4 , 1 iitti4f4 .. .--44.ilf yt.4,44 - ":"*".• lb. , 2 Up i• .): •A:Y.-4.64•--1, 1211" '''''''' •144 * ' '''' 0-°‘ -;;Iti• • '* i. ' -1 v •• ••••• ; - ' • Nt • 7r•-"V - , ri'•• rit.,fro* r' - "4 4..1.i 4. ; '.' ' ; • ' It . ' ...' .1.,i4..'i.;;;-$41-4,4%14' k- ,4 'll .....:4't: ;' ' d '''t it.° . '., • ...4,'. . !••• ;.41N, , .' .040 ',' .., %,t• ,....er,,A'•, ' '. 1 ' Vg. .*h .01. 7“, r, • •. ., 4..,„„.. • ••• . .. I,- '••,r:01, , ' cow (1) , t iiriA. :./.'Ole.,'III. IV't,,t'.. o• k' .a‘e.0 tk•:i': ' , ..v,..--.----...t.,-t tT.,,. f . "1:11444a• 40.st 4411... ..i.,-;.-:(4. .. .-0,.., --1 ;,,,. „ ..,c,... , , ,. „,,,,, ....?„,t,,,, : 2 ........dr`ri tit,.-, ,..A .•"••...,„,,,,. , ,ire.Atl. '... i,,,,,,, .[",:•,. " '.403.1Jx• ...."57: _Ii.,11 I, it. , 'rig r. •, . A ki • Pk.".. It. • 4 • • " MCI „.14704ii44,,, • .t,i.' AP.....,*.t_t r# „win ,,t. ::-,.,•• .••,...1 • . tin:: Aalli`r -r,..# ' ..‘ . .'„,.• ., ..: ,,e" --,..,6•4 :. . 4. "...,.d....;,;44,#..,,,,A-4•- !, .,:.7: 4. ,..cl'e"'"";;-.. .:' 7- 1..44%14"N! .1 ' - "1;11,..Plit-...'!". - ;';; ',Er' ; ''...n.=114ii°'' ....i- •-•••`-''`` .... :... ... ,..;.% . 6 ..,‘, .. .,. : ri • , . ..I' .- ...- P • . : •.4.ty ,,,,104a ed ty . *VV., :do • ..),...,..pfir..-. ir ..• ' ••---.64 •••;'„ .-,,:i • ,10,...1-_,,,i -t. IT,•• •• "•'' . , 4: 4IL er 141b il .1 ;01i • ^.1.,‘•'•4:4-41.••• 1 ' . •-,c. •,.t. ,o,t's .... , , ve s .1 • ft • N...,,,,4-i "-*ififf0) ti:X44{1'111. : *tr.- . i.' 4.,4;;J: ...•"-1.' • ''',. .."''''.4 4. - t-,„.;,1' ,1 4,L 3 ...., --1%. .1,.4-,,,-#"!?/. ,- .' .,,' • A' , 4 ••-1 ,44r` '....r...° - 4••' ,' 1,C;#trb•-••••••• ••- 4ii,-., t. "- ' a • al) it -.......1, -,,,,. ,,,,ir,. ,•,r•gt, '" ••$•••„t,,„,..,,i,• ,,1,.. ' y. ...". " 1, • , z . .3.• ;44',1 .1 ,,....,; •r . .,....,. •,'..,0,..7 •dir ,,,.,' ' A i, • Yr ' giqe, ',,i, 1 ;$+:',*04',46,• ,;:.,-;..t irte4 . ,_,, .,.,. 12...es., ..,- • ....... ..i1,4,5. :4, .„ • , ...,,.. ..., ., Ao.. .„4.4..,-, ,- , ,i, 11/44r.P'* lama 1:1. --- .daige 4' ' • ' ••- . ' ' ",•-• ;,. " itA • 11..t tt, 4 . • A, ••",;" . • w,,,A1„ ' •,,,,,-,h,41"'"5••-',••1,•• g, e'1.4.,,_•1.••070,‘",,,,,%m. ., ..1N .2 ,41/t. I . . , ,;i 1• ,, f•- ,••.. 1;-•. f'•rt :t.;„e mAlLit• • 4• .44, .,4• ., • ,. k : " ',1•.;Vo". .094, It.,e .. ••,"'s „. r„:mrop A .• it••••fd... . -AVM qSr1H)1 4 1111.°;`44' iA I'''' it,.in•„; 1 '1 ,."' • 'it...t. .' • tri.-'; l: ....‘t14 tt141;;341.;& i*:,,i' 144'. .. 4'rid .71:r .-t•. 'l'.. Y'''s i ''; 4- -r A..r ...' .. .. • •... . ,/14. 4. '•'''',,"..1. Si 4r,'7, ' lofkrel ' .. • 4•i• .4,1;•'''.'e• :st,-.•, ,,.... • . .1 ,rii(kiis ...(7' ?mitt .../••••,.. •Y--- i'I'vl-li •.4-6''. . , ,„ ,t... m.' '- .r., ..tr. . .fotle.''•' • Z.4. ' '7,, • ‘* - • • ., ''r • " ,'.rty,., ' '' VP' • •••70 ''ai r.4 , .•. • ,,.r.),., 1+:;",,,,,:‘,,A-11 ,A,-4.,,, ,J 4'4: ;._„1, ,.„-.;, ' ..ttto • ... ' . _,,- . L.i:i -, ••• .....iii!, 8.•,...hta• ./....,'!..- . .;• • .-.2i.Z1 . .....-:•,=C1141 I i. '. 1..apfl''''.44i•I cc 11,47;41r'l • 4 41' •!..4. 't'''.'.-5 i ''' 4'- .5F', "‘"7-. .4 0; ","" 171. r.1.`tr.. =:-..4".'".4' t'..1t. i-,v,,,p, el.,- „Li 7 1' 12 I•,..* A 7 iztt'..- .1. •vri./ 1.1- . 4. . ' • - ' V.7.--- .''' ..b.r... •.*. , ..--1-. •••,.. 4. A 4•••- .. , .... .4. .2.-,.. . ..; . , .. • ...k • ..... . ... _ N , ...... ,..Arn Kiri. 1 lam ,4:. ,41,f•:•• ,ji.- , 4, ...,go .,:4; ,-,.. ..: sr...), . ; . .., .. .4 4,4 .. -i'` :•••(•''... .1.,', ., •. -,.. ' .,•it-,,T . 14.4,, kit, nzi,;N4 1;..0 ..i".• •'• '.'.. ad''4449-' ,I ',I-4,.". 1 •' -If •••-,-,41 :. .. '. .-iNr;44- *,,4,7;",* •••`•' •• • i•'4''-• --• - A'',"4.. tres..--. .-• ; • •-‘,...- •i-, \st vil .4,7,- i-41,x,i1A7its,',1- A . • if• ' C ••• 7 ^.:"?0,.. ,ty r •..', ,, r ,,,i o 4, It.I, • I fl CI,,'%qiii'•••-.. q.'14 . ' ..Mfr 1..3 (.•, ,.• 4 , ) .. , ..-r •'.1 _ :I" 11,4.kt•4c. '4 'p; , l'Altfitgl•ii.•r ; ,,... N•rd' :TS'Oil. •i I%•• •t ,....S....4).,.,,,,,SA;4,... ...,,4.. •• ,„,t_ ilk,, ..,•• - . ,, ..„,-4••• .• I . - L 4 •-0: 4.4.s. 44...a.,.11!t...-.4,2 ,4414tic," ,,,..... i ..,,.. ., ., ,II I ''' . 4 ..t,V •, ,, .r. _ ..,,..0,‘,14..0...I I.J ' i It,•‘ ' • .. . . r.. :•- ',.• .. A ' '•' - li e '..• ' .1•VIA '."*....."-tri.`-'1'171#' '''• :„4' .- 4•'-'"'',••r.riiluttf../,',";:••"4. -of "' ' -•'•.- • : " ••4.'„?A'''._f, ,..`• ' ,e ''. .144,...r.,' • ,_,3 ':' ,• rue •-e,•--. - • ,, .4. - • I 'I ... ,4', -•• •Wr •••• -ti:V?".N4,`•-•1.••';‘`".04 -' '1,,• --" E''',-.7'''''''----.144,- , 1--7.- '.'3 • . • . .,t--,, '''.4,si:(' '44:1. ' 417..•I .,hi".1.-' - fle,' i Ili' rc 4. miCrii--,;',.-•'••,• • .- . • ••• 7.:•ii - *. •.:•• ••••-•'.•". '' " • -•-.• gi,•444"..).• V,/ ..? , • ,';',.r? ....„ A.r, , I.:'4...4. ''•- .. L....•: ,,. \.. ,..` -*, .. fl. :1 .?"- %Is. '.4.4 re 'I!. l• . 1 .r ' • * •-• . '•'!.• " • ''' - ' .."- . •- - 1.ii.r.'' •,1 11%;e1;" „7.74. ir .,, , 4 fi.'.• k I: .. .OX. ... • • • -•- • . C) . '•• ' . .. . • VI •t6 .), 1..•-'..0 a 4:1 4 kl . cu tu 2. c cb V >w..?.... 10.1) . ..,-,-,.,..:.„, 1-5,... tit ts, .g .. O. %:::.'..' '5..= 5 •••-• = L. '''l vs .1-1, s r2 e-,., 8 ...,,r. . , .. .. 8,FJ,.... t.,;.,,, c, ut E.5. ,z•••-•22 •' . 03) , a) Lo , 46 • 0 0 ,8 &LI. g,' ,..,:,2 „„ 0 ......0 • - .!, -.0- g574.. • ti'l' ?..).516-_• ck' E T,402 • -••••,_,,• 0 a,' .ig -m - t.Pt- .9 1...0 0 u- cli 8 u-- -0 6,:4 a di) cr• MI .... 61 cu . U) ••,a. (1) pr..,b .13 v.., u '-'eu-r.d 0._.0 0...r• ay". rt = 61 0 .0-d p . .... rff (.., c 3 c'-,',,= 0..... g 1:11,1:11 pa g t = ,. 4,,,,e :a.) ...4......, • r.#3 0...„ ....Ili a,1.,-; cu 0 r., a,c, .... c > I:1 = >.'41 1-1; s. boo I•. aV): .0' - g.p= tR..''I' 00. 0•5c-• t'e".f.?s Va. =.0.... t,-o•.,.,- ,,..._ cn _, = 0 ,,:•.= 0 ,... .7:-.•' = 4.,'§ M '-' en '11 -100 p flo g;,:g ci,) w '-• 0 1-,'2 '''cij ''':-.51'g `4 '". --,•- 41 f..1 .).0 It ,(41)! -1 ° JD L. a al a cig3 = oz . 0.,::.......5,.° .E3''''.1-,g- .t.s .3, ,, el, .g 7,6 s TA § i.d.'..-: ./ g =-= • C 10 8-ecuc:140-a.. .tuog 'ilk; c'tE•5co',.„6 . -5 ,14-, •Is cite „0`1' ,19 . 1.• 0, 4-Si CI.° Co 44 *z.z =,.,§ 41:4•EN'c.,18;,..,...9.,:,74,0-'12J.c/2°-0, g.0 g 2,.1...0 6.. bit.°0..0 =..,„:.5 ow __cis in ..1.‘' „,,„.... E "Cf 1.. .4-• 1-. -8. 1:4 > RI cu cli C tta oly(Is 0 0 e =3 !, OS.M 40 1.,., 2 D.•. t...,Cd 0 ,w ..'AE0.--.0g,,...,gF..r.,-n1r.Eu-.,.•.q.t-ua.00eaCo.l C g .1 i► ' 1 \ .� I� '\\ \ j. I . /i S \ \ , //- S. \\ , • % \ ~ I r 1,701/' , ' \\ U.1 I j \ r / • • ,r / \ ~ / `j �,q`=r R 1 i Q CC I CC • . , 0 .1 ( .::".1,:c..4. 1.1't , rj �' I —_ u. I I —o 0 I , i ( � ' I � II CL :1 • I I • 41i.:: 1‘_ ,..., ...„..,..4 ,.__ I i, I i i ! i • i, ' .77.77'..-".."--77-7-1 • = • ri `. h :a ... z j Wri442n Te�i�wivn� SLLbm,•tte rC+ � J v'n n S rr�;;^f� 3/a7 /E8 roc-AinCil rrrC'efi, 1J I WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS MY 2 MINUTES VISITORS REMARKS TO THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 4.8 BY RESPECTFULLY REQUESTING THAT IT BE REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA AT THIS TIME. BEFORE DOING THAT, I WOULD LIKE TO INTRODUCE SOME OF OUR EMPLOYEES AND MEMBERS OF THEIR FAMILY, INCLUDING ALL OF THE MEMBERS OF THE SMETS FAMILY WHO ESTABLISHED OUR BUSINESS IN TIGARD IN 1973 ON THE LAND WHICH WE PURCHASED FROM DEE PRESNALL. THROUGH HARD WORK AND LONG HOURS ALL OF US HAVE BUILT THIS DEBT FREE COMPANY AND SOME OF US HAVE EVERYTHING WE HAVE INVESTED IN IT. WE MANUFACTURE WORK STATION HANDLING EQUIPMENT FOR THE WOOD WORKING, PULP AND PAPER, SAWMILL AND ELECTRONICS INDUSTRY. WHEREVER YOU SEE A FORK LIFT TRUCK, A CONVEYOR, ESPECIALLY A WOODEN PALLET, THAT IS OUR PRODUCT SERVICE AREA. OUR MACHINERY HELPS ELIMINATE WORK STATION PAIN AND INJURY TO EMPLOYEES. WE ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THE PACTRUST RELATED ISSUE BECAUSE OUR SMALL BUSINESS IS THREATENED MORE THAN EVER BEFORE. WHAT CONCERNS US MOST IS THAT WE WERE PUT BEHIND A YEAR IN OUR BUILDING PLAN DUE TO NEGOTIATIONS IN GOOD FAITH WITH THE KOLL COMPANY WHICH WAS A DEAL TO EXCHANGE PROPERTY FOR A BUILDING. THE RECORDS APPEAR TO BE THAT 6 MONTHS WERE LOST BECAUSE WE WERE NOT NOTIFIED THAT PACTRUST HAD PICKED UP KOLL' S INTEREST. PACTRUST MADE US A LOWER OFFER WITH THE THREAT THAT IF WE DIDN'T SELL THEY W CLJLD GET THE PROPERTY THROUGH CONDEMNATION. WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE WHO APPEAR TO HAVE A LOT OF MONEY? NO ONE SEEMED TO KNOW AND THE INFORMATION WAS HARD TO GET. THE STATE TREASURER'S OFFICE THE LIBRARY, ETC. , COULD ONLY COME UP WITH AN OREGON CORPORATION. FINALLY PETER BECHIN CALLED ME AND SAID THEY WERE PART OF KKR -KOLBERG KRAVIS ROBERTS ( OF RJ REYNOLDS NABISCO BUYOUT FAME) LATER I FOUND THAT KKR BORROWS FROM STATE INVESTMENT TRUST FUNDS OF OREGON, WASHINGTON AND MICHIGAN WITH A 30-40% RETURN. IN MY OREGON TREASURY TEXTBOOK THIS IS TOO RISKY FOR THE PRUDENT MAN RULE. BEFORE YOU IS A MODEL OF THE BULLDINGS WE PLAN TO BUILD IN THE NEAR FUTURE. WE HOPE THE COUNCIL CAN HELP US. WE NOW HAVE AN UNSOLICITED REQUEST FOR A LEASE FOR 5000 s.f. FROM A TIGARD PRESTIGIOUS CAR SERVICE COMPANY WHO WILL BE FORCED TO MOVE FROM THE AREA IF HE CAN'T SETTLE IN OUR BUILDING. HE NEEDS AN EASY TO FIND LOCATION IN TIGARD. AS OF TODAY PACTRUST HAS PRESENTED NO BUILDING PLANS AND THE ONLY ACTIVITY IS A DEMOLITION CREW SLOWED DOWN BY THE COMPLICATIONS OF ASBES S REMOVAL. J E. SMETS 6830 S.W. Bonita Road Tigard, Oregon 97224 .0789 69 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: Aril 10 1989 DATE SUBMITTED: March 30, 1989 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE:m E, Parking - PREVIOUS ACTION: Restrictions on SW 135th Ave. /I/ 1/ PREPARED BY: Randall R. Woole DEPT HEAD � CITY ADMIN OK/ AV REQUESTED BY: V POLICY ISSUE Shall parking be prohibited along SW 135th Avenue? INFORMATION SUMMARY On March 27, 1989, the Council heard testimony regarding the need for parking restrictions along SW 135th Avenue. After hearing the testimony, directed staff to prepare an ordinance that would prohibit parking on both side of 135th Avenue between Scholls Ferry Road and Morning Hill Drive. The Council further directed that the parking restrictions should be effective on May 1, 1989. The attached ordinance formally adopts the parking restrictions as directed by the Council. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Adopt the attached ordinance. 2. Amend the attached ordinance. FISCAL IMPACT Approximately $800 for the purchase and installation of signs. SUGGESTED ACTION Adoption of the attached ordinance accomplishes the previous Council direction. dj/PKORD.RW • CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY P4pi ID t 1 AGENDA OF: M -_ , 1989 DATE SUBMITTED: March 20, 1989 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Adoption of PREVIOUS ACTION: City Center Development City Center De4elopment Plan Aaencv Created on February 13, 1989 PREPARED BY: Elizabeth A. Newton DEPT. HEAD Q v,C CITY ADMIN OK REQUESTED BY; �r POLICY ISSUE Adoption of the City Center Development Plan creating the City Center Development area and authorizing the use of Tax Increment Financing to fund projects and programs in the area, and acceptance of the City Center Development report which outlines the planning and funding mix for projects and programs. INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached is an ordinance which, if approved, would adopt the City Center Development Plan. The Plan sets the City Center Development District boundaries, authorizes the use of tax increment financing for projects, establishes a 16 year period, and lists generally the programs and projects. In addition, the Plan identifies the City Council as the City Center Development Agency and establishes the City Center Advisory Commission. If adopted, the City Center Development Plan will be referred to the voters as required under City Charter. Ai13o attached is a resolution which, if approved, would "accept" the City Center Development Report. The report is intended as a companion document to the Plan and further defines the programs and projects to be undertaken as well as the phasing and funding mix. In addition, the Report documents existing conditions in the area which, under ORS 457 qualify as "blighting conditions". ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the attached ordinance adopting the City Center Development Plan and the resolution accepting the Report as submitted on March 27, 1989. 2. Receive public testimony on March 27, 1989, direct staff to make appropriate revisions to the Plan and Report and postpone adoption of the ordinance and resolution to April 10, 1989. 3. Receive public testimony on March 27, 1989 and postpone adoption to a later date. FISCAL IMPACT The primary fiscal implication is that adoption of the Plan, if ratified by the voters, would allow the use of tax increment financing to fund projects and programs in the City Center Development area. The fiscal impacts detailed in the Report include the use of tax increment financing for approximately 43% of project funding. In addition, it is estimated that Local Improvement Districts would provide 17% of the funds, 28% would come from the Department of Transportation and 11% of the financing would come from other sources including City General Obligation Bonds and Capital Improvement Program funds. SUGGESTED ACTION Receive public testimony on March 27, 1989, direct staff to make appropriate revisions to the Plan and the Report and postpone adoption of the ordinance and resolution to April 10, 1989. br/CCDSUMM.EAN CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 89- AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE TIGARD CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN. WHEREAS, on February 13, 1989, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 89-05, establishing the City Center Development Agency; and WHEREAS, on March 6, 1989, the City Center Plan Task Force presented the City Center Development Plan and Report to City Council; and WHEREAS, on March 16, 1989, the Tigard City Council received a resolution from the Tigard Planning Commission recommending approval of the Tigard City Center Development Plan; and WHEREAS, pursuant to applicable state and local law, the City of Tigard has provided public notice and considered public testimony regarding the Tigard City Center Development Plan; and WHEREAS, pursuant to ORS 457.095, the Tigard City Council has reviewed the Tigard City Center Development Plan and therefore, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Primary obstacles to attracting private development in the area are: lack of access; poor traffic circulation; lack of sufficient parking facilities; mixed land uses; under-utilized land; small individually owned parcels; lack of positive image and identity; and inadequate public facilities to meet future growth. The obstacles identified as hi,idering private development in the City Center qualify as "blighting conditions" under ORS Chapter 457. Section 2: The rehabilitation and redevelopment of the City Center area is necessary to protect the public health, safety, or welfare of the municipality. Section 3: The Tigard City Center Development Plan conforms to the City's Comprehensive Plan as a whole and provides an outline for accomplishing the urban renewal projects the City Center Development Plan proposes. Section 4: Provision has been made to house displaced persons within their financial means in accordance with ORS 281.045 to 281.105 and ORS 457.095(4). Section 5: The acquisition of real property provided for is necessary. Section 6: The adoption and carrying out of the City Center Development Plan is economically sound and feasible; and Section 7: The City shall assume and complete any activities prescribed it by the City Center Development Plan. ORDINANCE NO. 89- Page 1 r� The Tigard City Council hereby incorporates by reference the Tigard City Center c Development Plan, attached to this ordinance as Exhibit "A", as support for its above-mentioned findings. The Tigard City Council hereby adopts the Tigard City Center Development Plan, pursuant to the provisions of ORS Chapter 457, and directs the City Recorder to publish notice of the adoption of this ordinance in accordance with the requirements of ORS 457.115. The Tigard City Council further directs the City Recorder to record a copy of the ordinance approving the Tigard City Center Development Plan with the recording officer of Washington County, Oregon, pursuant to ORS 457.125, and directs the city Recorder to send a copy of this ordinance to the Tigard City Center Development Commission. PASSED: By vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this day of , 1989. Loreen Wilson, City Recorder APPROVED: This day of , 1989. C Gerald R. Edwards, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Timothy V. Rami3, City Attorney Date br/CCDA.ean ORDINANCE NO. 89- Page 2 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON C 3 ' RESOLUTION NO. 89- A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT REPORT. WHEREAS, on February 13, 1989, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 89-05 establishing the City Center Development Agency; and WHEREAS, on March 6, 1989, the City Center Plan Task Force presented the City Center Plan and Report to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Center Development Report was prepared in conformance with ORS Chapter 457 as a companion document to the City Center Development Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Center Development Report contains recommendations on the phasing and funding mix for projects to be implemented and the documentation of current conditions in the City Center Development area; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the City Center Development Report; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: The City Council reviewed the City Center Development Report and the Council accepts the Report attached as Exhibit "A". Cathy Wheatley, Deputy City Recorder APPROVED: This day of , 1989. Gerald R. Edwards, Mayor Resolution No. 89- Page 1 C p KikfT �,..- April 7, 1989 60-ki\ Memo : ! TO: Patrick J. Reilly, City Administrator —`0f FROM: Ed Murphy, Community Development Directo pr SUBJECT: City Council Consideration of City •- • " -fir Development Plan April 10, 1989 Council meeting SUMMARY: In preparation for Council action on the City Center Development Plan and Report on April 10, 1989, several issues have been raised by Council members and Tim Ramis' office. Staff will be ready to discuss all of those issues at the hearing and has prepared proposed amendments to the Plan to address those issues. The issues and posible amendments and revisions to the Plan are outlined below. COUNCIL ISSUES: 'Identification of Specific Property to be Acquired for Protects. Since many project locations have not been precisely determined, Council is reluctant to identify property for acquisition. This issue was also raised by Tim Ramis' office as an area where the Plan is weak in terms of compliance with legislative intent. Staff met with Phil Grillo of Tim's office and 011ie Norville, a Portland Attorney recognized as an authority on Urban Renewal, on (7 April 6, 1989. The conclusion reached on this issue at that meeting was that where possible, the Plan should identify possible properties which may be acquired, however, like the projects themselves, these may change prior to implementation of a specific project. The actual identification of property to be acquired, in the opinion of Phil Grillo and 011ie Norville, can be processed as a minor amendment to the Plan. Staff has prepared a map which is attached illustrating possible property acquisitions for projects identified in the Design Plan. This map could be included in the Plan as an exhibit with specific property acquisition locations finalized at a later date. Tigard Public Square Location. The Council is concerned about the apparent conflict between the Design Plan and the Fanno Creek Master Park Plan and the location of the Tigard public plaza. In addition, though the two plans conflict, both indicate the plaza affecting the A-Boy site. The owners of A-Boy have submitted plans to construct new buildings on their property which preclude the plaza. Staff suggests that the project description on page 24 in the Report be amended to delete references to location as follows: Tigard Public Square. The Tigard Public Square would be a major open space serving as the focal point for commercial, cultural and social activity for the city center area. It would be supported by adjacent shopping space and a major public parking facility. For cost estimating purposes, the location and configuration of the square envisioned in the design study was used. Acquisition of necesary property and development of design features and landscaping are included in the estimated cost. The actual location and configuration of the public square will be determined at a later date. Greenbura Road extension project. At the March 27. 1989 study session, the Council directed staff to prepare language to define the extension of Greenburg Road acroos 99W to Hall Blvd. Staff purposes the following be added as a new project in the Plan. Greenburg Road extension. Provide a more direct connection between Greenburg Road and Hall Blvd. south of Pacific Highway. Council can amend the Plan on April 10, to include this project and direct staff to prepare a cost estimate and amend the report to reflect this new project. Historic Preservation. The Council has expressed concern that the Plan be in conformance with the City's historic preservation policies. Staff suggests that policy 3.7.1 from the Comprehensive Plan be added to the Plan in Section 404., page 13. The policy reads as follows: 3.7.1 The City shall identify and promote the preservation and protection of historically and culturally significant structure, site, objects and districts within Tigard. In additio, a policy could be added to Section 600, page 18 of the Plan which reinforces this policy. There are no structures in the city center study area designated Histioric District on the Comprehensive Plan. The Washington County Historical Sites Inventory Prepared in 1984 identifies Tigard Feed.and buildings now occupied by the Chamber and Tigard Shoe Repair'as historically significant. Projects to be Considered for Deletion from the Plan. Various members of Council have identified concerns about including the following projects in the Plan: 1) Restrooms 2) Entryways 3) Tigard Square 4) Community Center The Council will need to reach consensus on these items. ISSUES OF MARCH 29, 1989 TO PAT REILLY FROM TIM RAMIS Section 1202 - Plan, page 34 Remove the word "decrease". It seems unlikely that an increase in the land area of the development district boundaries would be of concern to voters and the expense of an election may deter future Agency members from supporting a decrease in area when one is appropriate. Section 1202 - Plan, page 34 Add "substantial" before the word "increase". The purpose of this recommendation was to avoid situation where a minimal increase in the boundary for, say, right-of-way acquisition would not have to be referred to the voters. However, with the modifications proposed in the acquisition section, a minor increase in land area that does not involve tax increment financing would not be referred to the voters. Adding a qualifying word like "substantial" may cause confusion about the intent of this Section. C �-- Section 1202 - Plan, page 34 ( Clarify "effective period" or remove the Section. Staff and the City Attorney's office agree that this Section should be compatible with Section 1301 and suggest that B. be rewritten to read: =B. An increase in the durN.4-ion 4-he Plan as described in Section 1301;" Section 212 - Plan, page 5 Remove the word "either" on line 1. Change the word"or" to "and " on line 2. The attorney suggests these modifications to require the two part test. There may be a situation where an expensive engineering design for project may not alter the function of the project but could be argued to have "significant" economic impacts. Section 602 - Plan, page 22 The memo indicates that it is necessary to identify specific parcels of property that will be acquired. In subsequent meetings with; 011ie Norville and Phil Grillo, and staff, consensus was reached that, where possible, the Plan should identify possible property for acquisition and that the propety acquisition Section of the Plan sufficiently addresses how the determination of property for acquisition will be made in the future. A map which shows possible property for acquisition as part of some of the projects included in the Plan is attached. The map could be included as an exhibit to the Plan. Section 601 - Plan, page 18 Sewers should be identified as part of the Plan. The current sewer system in the city center study area has capicity to accomodate anticipated development. Lines may be re-routed as part of private development or street improvements , but not because of inadequate capacity. Staff will include sewers as a possible activity in all street projects in the Plan. Section 607 - Plan, page 18 Delete as unnecessary. Althon.gh not a statutory requirement to include in the Plan, there is no real disadvantage to leaving it in and it may be preferable at this time not to make too many amendments to the Plan. Section 703 - Plan, page 29 Delete as unnecessary. Again, not a statutory requirement. Section 801 - Plan, page 30 Delete as unnecessary. Even though not required in the statute, it may be preferable not to amend the Plan by deleting it at this time. \ CITY CENTER PROJECTS AND ACTIVITIES k POSSIBLE PROPERTY ACQUISITION LOCATIONS I 44% i i,, s A k mi. .---,:„.::,,, eit.,.s_. 4_, : � .. ■, 1-,.. �....„:„... , A ': !.' ‘2..s.;;::* .7., mi., , . 0, ..,:.2N ., ilit....,=. ,_ .... ..11., , ilit.,. ., ,,t t-,..,,ri. 1�/� J s e',.,€'4, -,,,,.,E$47 .".;;!..,,, '':...:,..:.,1,,,,..:0";_ . C etv r s r. 0 je..!,-.4461, .::::;:'- ',...*:;,:'. I' ‘6, 0 ''' 444k. '' R y �'• �3 f i { .1... 4. at • . ,. C!',* Rim 4,^m` * r 7 Burnham Street Realignment (exact alingment to be determined) IIIIIIIL 2 Burnham-Hall Intersection „' Burnham Street Improvement Burnham Street Enhancement A Entryway Development, Landscaping and Landmark Structures Tarso Park Development Hall and Pacific Intersection Improvement (location to be determined) 2 Public Parking Facilities Aah Avenue Improvements (exact alignment to be determined) Building Rehabilitation Assistance Commercial Street Improvements Pacific Highway Ramp to Tigard Street (location to be determined) %///. Tigard Public Square Development (location to be determined) • Community Center Building (location to be determined) Hall Boulevard Enhancement Public Restroom Facilities (exact location to be determined) er. 1, i��a `� JOHJOHN C. SAVORY, I I <` :rf. tai S `T} 12245 SOUTHWEST MAIN STREET JD TIGARD, OREGON 9722411 MAR 3 0 198 March 30, 1989 To: Members of the Tigard City Council At the Tigard Economic Development Committee meeting of March 21, 1989, the members authorized me to submit a written statement in support of the ordinance to adopt the City Center Development Plan. The Committee further asked that I remind you that the E.D.C. identified downtown revitalization as it's top priority three years ago. In fact, the C.C.P.T.F. was spawned from the committee's efforts. The committee is pleased that the city has a plan under consideration which addresses the prime committee concerns: a. That the plan be realistic in its expectations for economic revitalization of the area. b. That public improvements, such as roads and sewer lines, complement potential private investments. c. That the city make a commitment to take an active role in guiding the economic future of the downtown. The committee has monitored the progress of the C.C.P.T.F. and has discussed the issue of tax increment financing on several occasions. It is the feeling of the E.D.C. that Tigard should have the ability to utilize the tax increment method as a means of financing public improvements in the downtown. The E.D.C. endorses the plan and looks forward, with great anticipation, to the city wide benefits that a successful down- town revitalization effort will bring. /Sincerely, L---17/-"--; ;;(°1)4/:› John C. Savory eo j f.0: eou nci l 144,&//ly Ed/Murb tii< Veu/ 4.1,141 fo: eat kJ City Center Development Plan and Report k PROPOSED REVISIONS April 10,1989 Items to be added are underlined, items to be deleted are shown in [brackets]. Alan TArvO c — 917 "NEW PROJECT" r7_ New project means a project that [either] has a substantially different function than the project it replaces [and] or has significant economic, environmental, social or physical impacts not prviously considered by the Development Agency. Minor changes in design, function or cost shall not constitute a new project. Plan page 12 - Policy 3.5.3 The City [shall designate] has designated the 100-year floodplain of Fanno Creek, its tributaries, and the Tualatin River as greenway, which will be the backbone of the open[-] space system. Where landfill and/or development are allowed within or adiacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adioinina and within the floodplain. Plan page 15 - 501. LAND USE DESIGNATIONS The land use designations of the City's Comprehensive Plan which affect the City Center Development Area are described [on Exhibit B of this plan and are described] in Chapter 18.66 of the City's Development Code, which is incorporated by reference. The purpose of the CBD zoning district is to provide for a concentrated, central commercial office retail area which also provides civic, high density residential and mixed uses. Plan page 19 - 2. Burnham Street. Realign and improve westerly section to intersect Main Street opposite Tigard Street and improve to include landscaping, sidewalks, street furniture, decorative lighting standards to match or complement Main improvements. Improve balance of Burnham easterly to Hall Boulevard. Accomodate the potential for light rail in the design of Burnham Street. Plan page 20 - Mini Parks [Mini Parks] Landscaped Areas Provide for the development of [mini parks, ] special landscaped areas adjacent to streete and pedestrian ways, particularly along Burnham. Encourage private property owners to participate significantly in these projects. C Plan page 22 - 602. ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY, A. AUTHORIZATION Add to the end of the paragraph: Possible property acquisition locations for some protects identified in this Plan are Shown on "Exhibit B". Actual properties to be acquired will be identified prior to prosect implementation and, if different from those shown on Exhibit "B", will be processed as minor amendments to the Plan under Section 1201. of this Plan. Plan page 34 - 1202. SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES A. An increase [or decrease of] in the land area within the boundaries of the development area; B. An increase in the (effective period] duration of (this] the Plan, as described in Section 1301; Plan page 36 - 1301. DURATION OF DEVELOPMENT PLAN This Plan shall remain in full force and effect for a period '' of not more than sixteen (16) years from the effective date of this Plan or from July 1, 1990, whichever is later and that period of time necessary to retire any debt. Any extension beyond sixteen (16) years shall require an authorized extension and shall be considered as a substantial change pursuant to Section 1203. C Jr c Report page 24 - Revise description of Tigard Public square to reads "The Tigard Public Square would be a major openspace serving as the focal point for commercial, cultural, and social activity for the city center area. It would be supported by adjacent shopping space and a major public parking facility. For cost estimating purposes, the location and configuration of the square envisioned in the design study was used. Acquisition of necessary property and development of design features and landscaping are included in the estimated cost. The actual location and configuration of the square would be determined at a later date. Report pages 19 - 27 Addition of sewer relocations, reconstruction or repair. Staff will revise project descriptions in the City Center Development Report to include sewer line relocations, reconstruction, or repair as an eligible improvement as part of street improvement projects. C EXHIBIT. "B" CITY CENTER PROJECTS AND ACTIVITIES t POSSIBLE PROPERTY ACQUISITION LOCATIONS /L_. ii # iiA ki...i .,,, Niillks-.___..,•_,, . ......,..., I. -....-,.., .. *le* 1. _-_..„..., ... .. -.:.....„, .......:.." Nil, . • __- ...... . ,,, , s •4R,i. • ..z. <,...11144°' f. .,0 . .;,> , N o •NINI, #1ellii ( • Nk;-.4.v.„47 - • 1,4 t.4- .••., '‘I'el A'1•'• J 11111::: A - ..,,et.....:#"‘ e:*44-:•'Ile it„.. 4 4,,kt .4-.0. i.4 .0q4Ak. it. ell rulL',,, ,_, t• • 1 44'.1'' i% 4 1,>#W- It:,t4e.,•"41441,7 I t eY7 it : Wr''',, w 44 1 Burnham Street Realignment (exact alinement to be determined) • 2 Buro:as-Hall Intersection Burnham Street Improvement Burnham Street Enhancement A Entryway Development, rands--aping and Landmark Structures Panne Park Development Ball and Pacific Intersection Improvement (location to be determined) N I Public Parking Facilities Ash Avenue Improvements (exact alignment to be dei velaed) Building Rehabilitation Assistance Commercial Street Improvements Pacific Highway Ramp to Tigard Street (location to be determined) /// Tigard Public Square Development (location to be determined) O Community Center Building (location to be determined) Ball Boulevard Enhancement Public Rastroom Facilities (exact location to be determined) ,4". 521-..1 btr ► oZ / - City Center Development Plan and Report DOADASSD AnDTTTANs April 10, 1989 HISTORIC PRESERVATION: Plan page 11 - J. To ensure that the protection of significant historic and cultural resources is considered in implementation of the City Center Development Plan. Plan page 13 - 3.7.1 The City shall identify and promote the preservation and protection of historically and culturally significant structure, site, obiects and districts within Tigard. GREENBURG ROAD EXTENSION: Plan page 19 - Greenbury Road Extension. Provide a more direct connection between Greenburq Road and Hall Blvd. south of Pacific Hwy Should Council consensus be to add this project to the City Center Development Plan, Council should direct staff to prepare a cost estimate and amend the City Center Development Report. Council should also discuss the proposed timing of this project for inclusion in the report. C ,._ City Center Development Plan and Report • PXOPoSED DELETIONS April 10, 1989 PROJECTS: Restrooms Plan, page 21 Entryways Plan, page 20 Tigard Square Plan, page 21 Community Center Plan, page 20 Should Council consensus be to delete any of the above listed projects from the City Center Development Plan, Council should direct staff to make the appropriate revisions to the City Center Development Report at the time the Report is accepted. C C, �1_ Y TIGARD CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT REPORT FINAL DRAFT W 44.„,::::,,,,,,.....N. rte' 7 /44 %., 1 1. .....?..tt,,,k4•Iti,„.... .,...;,&,:k,7„ 4 41:4—, w c,.s,.. s _o__10,0 •,,,,,, .;.. si .0 c , • .5 •\ ,....,, ,,,,,. \ i 4. ..,..." ,` _ , • March 3, 1989 f r E TABLE OF CONTENTS S INTRODUCTION 1 Section 100. DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING CONDITIONS AND ANTICIPATED IMPACTS 1 101. Physical Conditions 1 101.1 General Description 1 101.2 floodplain 1 101.3 Planning and Zoning 1 101.4 Land Use 1 Existing Land Use 5 Establishments by SIC Code Type 5 101.5 Existing Lotting Patterns 5 101.6 Street Classifications and Improvements 6 101.7 Traffic Safety 6 101.8 Access 6 101.9 Other Infrastructure 8 102. Social and Economic Conditions 11 102.1 Population 11 Development Area Population Assumptions 11 Population of Development Area, City, County and Region 11 102.2 Income 11 Tigard 1979 Household Income 12 102.3 Housing 12 ' 102.4 Employment 12 103. Property Values in Development Area 13 104. Impacts of the Plan in Light of Added Services or increased Population 13 105. Percent of City Represented in Development Area 14 SECTION 200. REASONS FOR SELECTION OF CITY CENTER AS THE DEVELOPMENT AREA 15 SECTION 300 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PROJECTS TO BE UNDERTAKEN UNDER THE PLAN AND EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE AREA 16 SECTION 400. PROJECT ACTIVITIES - TIMING, FUNDING SOURCES & COSTS 17 401. Timing, Description, Estimated Cost & Funding Source 17 401.A Projects, Costs & Funding Sources: Fiscal Years 1991-1995 18 Period 1991-95 Revenue Summary 19 Period 1991-95 Project Descriptions 19 401.B Projects, Costs & Funding Sources: Fiscal Years 1996-2000 22 Period 1996-2000 Revenue Summary 23 Period 1996-2000 Project Descriptions 23 401.0 Projects, Costs & Funding Sources: Fiscal Years 2001-2005 25 Period 2001-2005 Revenue Summary 26 Period 2001-2005 Project Descriptions 26 402. Summary of Funding Sources 27 SECTION 500. FUNDS REQUIRED, TAX INCREMENT PROCESS AND YEAR OF AGENCY'S INDEBTEDNESS BEING SATISFIED. 28 501. Projections of Incremental Values and Revenues 28 Development Activity Worksheet 29 502. Cash Flow, Debt Repayment, and Year Debt Is Satisfied. 30 i C 503. Finding of Financial Feasibility 30 Projected Tax increment Cash Flow 30 SECTION 600. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING iMPACTS ON OVERLAPPING TAXING 31 DISTRICTS 601. Taxing District Valuations, Levies, and Rates - History and Projections 31 Taxable Value of Overlapping Districts 31 Historical and Prof .cted Imputed and Projected Levies 32 Overlapping Taxing Districts Tax Rates - Historical & Projected 32 Overlapping Taxing Districts 33 602. Development Area Valuation Relative to Districts' Valuations 33 603. Analysis and Projection of Tax Rate Impacts SECTION 700. RELOCATION REPORT 36 701. Relocation Analysis 36 702. Relocation Methods 36 703. Housing Deletions & Additions 36 SECTION 800. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION 37 • UST OF TABLES Table 1 Existing Land Use 4 Table 3 Development Area population Assumptions 11 ( Table 4 Population of Development Area, City, County and Region 11 Table 5 Tigard 1979 Household Income 12 Table 6 Existing Conditions 16 Table 7 Projects, Costs & Funding Sources: Fiscal Years 1991-1995 18 Table 8 Projects, Costs & Funding Sources: Fiscal Years 1996-2000 22 Table 9 Projects, Costs & Funding Sources: Fiscal Years 2001-2005 25 Table 10 Total Funding Source Summary 27 Table 11 Projected Tax Increment Revenues 28 Table 12 Development Activity Worksheet 29 Table 13 Projected Tax Increment Cash Flow 30 Table 14 Taxable Value of Overlapping Districts Historical and Projected 31 Table 15 Imputed and Projected Levies Overlapping Taxing Districts 32 Table 16 Tax Rates - Historical & Projected Overlapping Taxing Districts 32 Table 17 Relationship of Development Area Valuation to Overlapping Districts 33 Table 18 Impacts on Tax Rates in Four Most Affected Districts 33 Tele 19 School District 23J Tax Rate Impact 34 Table 20 City of Tigard Tax Rate Impact 34 Table 21 Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District Tax Rate Impacts • 35 Table 22 Washington County Tax Rate Impacts 35 UST OF MAPS Map 1 CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AREA 2 Map 2 FANNO CREEK FLOOD PLAIN 3 Map 3 STREETS, CURBS & SIDEWALKS 7 Map 4 STORM DRAINAGE 8 Map 5 SANITARY SEWERS 9 Map 6 WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 10 ( ii INTRODUCTION This Report on the City Center Development Area is prepared to provide essential background information on the Area to the City Center Development Agency,the Tigard Planning Commission, the Tigard City Council, and citizens. It Is prepared to comply with provisions of State Law concerning urban renewal plans (ORS 457.085) and is to accompany Tigard's City Center Development Plan and should be read in conjunction with it. Section 100. DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING CONDITIONS AND ANTICIPATED IMPACTS 101. Physical Conditions 101.1 General Description The Development Area encompasses some 186 gross acres, approximately 120 buildable acres and 165 separate tax lots, all within the city limits of Tigard. The boundaries of the Development Area generally include Highway 99W on the North, S.W. Hall on the east,and S.W. McKenzie and S.W. Hill on the west. To the south, the boundary is irregular and follows lot lines north of S.W. Omara St. Refer to the following Map 1 for specifics. 101.2 Floodplain Fanno Creek crosses the area from the northwest to the southeast and separates the vacant 13.4 acre SeaFirst property from the remainder of the Development Area. The floodplain associated with the creek varies in width from approximately 200 feet to over 700 feet. The creek and floodplain create a barrier to both pedestrian and vehicle traffic. (See: Map 2 showing flood plain). 101.3 Planning and Zoning The Development Area is planned and zoned CBD (Central Business District). The CBD zone allows civic uses, commercial uses, and medium to high density residential uses. 101.4 Land Use A wide variety of land uses exist within the Development Area including both conforming and non-conforming uses. The uses in the area that are permitted in the CBD zone include commercial, civic, and medium to high density residential uses. In addition,the area includes the • following non-conforming uses: industrial, single family, and mobile homes. The prevalence of non-conforming uses in the Development Area represents improper utilization of the land within the Development Area. S.W. Bumham Street exists as a primary link between S.W. Main Street (the commercial core) and S,W, Hall Street (the City Hall area). Land uses along S.W. Burnham Street include a mix of industrial, commercial, public/semi-public,and single family residential. Based on street frontage, approximately 37% of the property along S.W. Burnham is currently used in ways which do not conform to City zoning and plans for the area. Excluding streets and railroad right-of-way, the Development Area is approximately 136 acres in size. Within the Development Area approximately 34.2 acres are vacant with approximately 35% of the vacant acres located within the floodplain. Excluding the 34.2 vacant acres, 102.3 acres are developed. Based on an analysis of current land use, non-conforming uses occupy 19% of the developed acres within the Development Area. C 1 C Map 1 CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AREA 11 a. % s4''. c,R , 4 le, si L •••. - • / •41 ..„.„,„;..,.. vNii, 0. ...„ .4S. . 4s.'cO\4 NT% e : ,... , _ , s,4*,. e___ ,.#'01 '4;' 7 c . . • ,,, , . \ , 4,,,, , 44* r y a 14 4 URURA ar ' ( 2 • MAP 2 FANNO CREEK FLOOD PLAIN . A Ili 99 , . . t 1 s ,.. . . . • —a �'��. s t `�` 4.0.., e ■ iel •* •I ice 'q„, is! V- C *. it N gi�yr titi+74 J, .. 4‘r/ J J S ANN\CREEK PARK TIGARa %4CTER 41 , IGAR:Walk -ENIOR ---"mi5 r ~ .,,IA ( 3 Actual land use within the Development Area is shown in the following table. Table 1 Existing Land Use Land Use Acres Conforming Uses Commercial 37.5 Public/semi/public 24.8 Multi-family 11.3 Park 9.2 Non-Conforming Uses Single family 5.5 Mobile Homes 2.0 Industrial/other* 12.0 Sub-total Developed: 102.3 Vacant 34.2 Total 136.5 *Note: Some other commercial uses do not meet Zone Code requirements for parking, landscaping maintenance and prohibitions on open outdoor storage. There were 167 business establishments, Including public and religious, in the area as of February 1988. The distribution of these establishments by type of business is shown on the following table: 4 /— k Table 2 Establishments by SIC Code Type February 1988 I l SIC Type of Business No. of Sq. Ft. % No. of Establ. X 7 Agri. Services 9,440 1.61% 4 2.40% 15 Gen. Contractor 2,030 0.35% 3 1.80% 17 Specialty Contractor 18,175 3.10% 7 4.19% 20 Food Manufacturing 27,340 4.66% 1 0.60% 25 Furniture Manuf. 1,730 0.30% 1 0.60% 27 Printing 20,170 3.44% 5 2.99% 35 Machinery 7,320 1.25% 3 1.80% 39 Misc. Manufacturing 4,500 0.77% 1 0.60% 41 Local Transit 2,000 0.34% 1 0.60% 43 Trans.& Warehousing 14,400 2.46% 1 0.60% 48 Communication 53,698 9.16% 2 1.20% 50 Whist: Durable Goods 21,825 3.72% 6 3.59% 51 Whlsl: NonDur. Goods 27,500 4.69% 5 2.99% 52 Bldg Material Dlrs 23,300 3.98% 4 2.40% 53 General Merchandise 2,950 0.50% 1 0.60% 54 Food Stores 3,500 0.60% 1 0.60% 55 Service Stations 27,800 4.74% 5 2.99% 56 Apparel 3,595 0.61% 3 1.80% 57 Furniture Stores 3,750 0.64% 3 1.80% 58 Eating & Drinking 23,050 3.93% 10 5.99% 59 Misc. Retail 38,450 6.56% 14 8.38% 60 Banking 19,500 3.33% 3 1.80% 64 Insurance 4,000 0.68% 4 2.40% 65 Real Estate 2,500 0.43% 2 1.20% 72 Personal Services 16,670 2.84% 15 8.98% 73 Business Services 9,140 1.56% 8 4.79% 75 Auto Repair 25,900 4.42% 11 6.59% 76 Misc. Repair 10,950 1.87% 7 4.19% 79 Recreation 10,000 1.71% 1 0.60% 80 Health Services 10,400 1.77% 8 4.79% 81 Legal Services 7,870 1.34% 5 2.99% 83 Social Services 9,580 1.63% 5 2.99% 86 fionprofit Org. 105,000 17.91% 7 4.19% 89 Misc. Services 18.126 3.09% 10 5.99% 586,159 167 Note: SIC is Standard Industrial Classification 101.5 Existing Lotting Patterns The Development Area exhibits an inefficient lotting pattern for the planned CBD uses. The area includes 165 lots with an overall average lot size of 37,730 square feet. Forty-one percent (41%) of the lots are less than 12,500 square feet In size. Small lots inhibit new development and require consolidation of properties for new planned commercial uses. Excluding parcels greater than 2.5 acres in size, 31 lots are classified as flag lots, are land- locked, or have a depth greater than twice the width. The lot configurations of these parcels constrain development by limiting full utilization of the entire parcel. C 5 101.6 Street Classifications and Improvements - Existing streets within the Development Area are classified as follows on the City Comprehensive Plan: Street Classification Pacific Highway 99W State Highway S.W. Hall State Highway S.W. Main Major Collector S.W. Burnham Major Collector S.W. Commercial Minor Collector S.W. Tigard Minor Collector S.W.Ash (unbuilt) Minor Collector S.W. Ash Local S.W. Scoffins Local S.W. McKenzie Local S.W. Electric Local Public improvements along streets within the Development Area vary greatly. Main Street is the only street to include concrete curbs and sidewalks along its entire length. All other streets lack improvements to full City standards. (See: Map 3 showing location of street sections with curbs and sidewalks). Portions of S.W. Hall, S.W. Commercial, S.W. Bumham, and S.W. Scoffins do not meet street width requirements for the classification assigned.The bridge on Main Street is narrow and does not meet City standards. These conditions inhibit vehicular access into and through the City Center, discourage pedestrian use and thus inhibit commercial and medium to high density residential development. 101.7 Traffic Safety Narrow street and bridge widths as noted in the previous section create traffic safety hazard within the Development Area. Additional traffic safety hazards include: • Lack of turn lanes on S.W. Hall • Sight Distance on S.W. Hall inadequate • Sight Distance at S.W. Main and S.W. Bumham inadequate • Congestion in the post office area • Sharp curves on S.W. Scoffins • Turning conflicts on S.W. Scoffins • Bus turn movements on S.W. Commercial • Offset intersection at Scoffins and Hall/Hunziker • RR crossing surface and signals need improvement In addition, the lack of sidewalks throughout the area poses serious safety hazards for pedestrians. 101.8 Access Vehicle access into and through the Development Area is inhibited. To enter the Development Area, southbound traffic on Highway 99W must use turn lanes on Highway 99W. S.W. Main intersects with Highway 99W at an acute angle which creates turning and access problems for traffic entering and exiting Highway 99W. As with most commercial enterprises, commercial uses along S.W. Main Street are dependent upon highway and street access. Access problems from Highway 99W, create limitation for successful commercial development in the area. Access through the Development Area is restricted by the lack of an adequate street system. Other than Highway 99W and Main Street at the edge of the Development Area, no existing streets cross the area in southwest to northeast direction. The lack of an additional southwest/northwest street, limits access and development between Burnham and Commercial streets and limits access from residential areas to the southwest of the Development Area. 6 C MAP 3 STREETS, CURBS & SIDEWALKS / 1 1/4A i.ril.,,Illi ....„.,:. ,,,4. , 4 , ,-....:;.. ., ,..„. _ . 4 _ 00.e, x i . .„ 4 , ` xi.o. 4. *V . ,.41 0 N 8 -4 ,, , • ( -.kik / 0 1 e N.e4. 4, _,... .44.4,,d, s 1j , ,k. ,sf.. 4 . • •.. .. ,...,,,, • CONCRETE MOM'LE .11 .• =11•• i CONCRETE CURT — -- A!►MALT CURE ( 7 1 J C101.9 Other Infrastructure Storm Drainage This map showing the location of existing storm drains reflects the lack of fully improved streets which normally contain storm drains within their rights-of-way. According to the City Engineering Department, the major deficiency within the area Is created by the railroad tracks which are an obstacle to drainage from the area to the north toward the creek. MAP 4 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM / ib ,/,.,.., ,# ,, lir 5 4rz4* .:-.... y 41, �-;.�-_ ....::::... i .•4„, �:�.` , c .N, `� 401' N • se . c 04 ! #..\N -444 ....0..e\ _ N • , , \., 4 ,.. • 41‘s:411,#'11110\ I .i •ir/ 4411 • T CI ----1—_• CATCH BASIN S--.— MANHOLE >-`"< CULVERT 8 I Sanitary Sewers This map shows the existing sanitary sewers including the major trunk ewer for the greater Tigard/Beaverton Area which follow Fenno Creek. The existing collection system is adequate to serve existing development and would be expanded without major trunk development as new buildings were constructed. MAP 5 SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM • �.; 1.111 � -, . ■i.. it .. 4 *t vi-1 I: Alioip;olt,s4A . in\ A A. .. . Ns .w in v.f.. 1: .. • s .‘ ...._1 . ( . 141, ,i* AlA \, / • .:.\ \ *4111 ,_ # . � 41 N 4/ 1 libs,..... am. 44#40„4444407/ ili-i e iii • MANNOL! ( 9 1" Water Distribution System k The map below shows t e existing water distribution lines within the Development Area.They are deemed by the Tigard Water District to be adequate for existing development and capable of being expanded in response to new development and its requirements. MAP 6 WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 44444 ..- , 0 v ,.. , •4 .. i Ii. A044 N 4 • 4,41044140f,/ 020> r 14 /: - lk , , ' V \01 ► IN I• \ \ /4 . Ai II' ( 10 J•wR fr 102. Social and Economic Coriuuwos 102.1 Population The total population estimated to be living within the Development Area as of November 1988 was 571 persons.This population estimate is based on a survey of housing units in the area and on the following persons per unit assumptions: Table 3 DEVELOPMENT AREA POPULATION ASSUMPTIONS 27 single family housing units x 2.64 persons/unit = 71 persons 249 multi-family units x 1.86 persons/unit = 463 persons 37 mobile home units x 1 person/unit = 37 persons Total persons 571 City of Tigard Dept. of Community Development Table 4 POPULATION OF DEVELOPMENT AREA, CITY, COUNTY AND REGION Area Population % Development Area 571 2.3% of City City of Tigard 24,573 0.2% of County Washington County 280,000 Portland MSA 1,307,000 City of Tigard Dept. of Community Development 102.2 Income Household income data was collected for the 1980 Census and represents 1979 data. Evidence indicates that household income within the Development Area is less than that in the City as a whole. The evidence for this conclusion is drawn from the housing types, the pattern of predominate renter residence, the generally low rent levels and the low average value of the single family homes which do exist in the Development Area. This information is shown in the next section on Housing. C 11 r-- C Table 5 TIGARD 1979 HOUSEHOLD INCOME Income Level $0 - $2,500 1.56% $2,500-4,999 5.57% $5,000-7,499 5.34% $7,500-9,999 7.90% $10,000-12,499 6.84% $12,500-14,999 7.10% $15,000-17,499 7.01% • $17,500-19,999 8.47% $20,000-22,499 8.92% $22,500-24,999 7.10% $25,000-27,499 5.28% $27,500-29,999 4.55% $30,000-34,999 9.27% $35,000-39,999 5.60% $40,000-49,999 5.17% $50,000-74,999 3.31% $75,000 + 1.02% 102.3 Housing A survey by the City of Tigard Department of Community Development in November of 1988 showed 313 housing units in the Development Area. Approximately 80% were duplex and multi- ( family, 12%were mobile-homes(all in one 37 unit mobile home park), and 8%single family.Thus there is an 80%to 20% split between multi-family and single family units. This compares to 64% single family and 36%multi-family in the entire Tigard-King City area according to a 1983 forecast made by the Metropolitan Service District for District 12 and cited in the City of Tigard Database (1988). The 1980 Census found that 54% of the housing units in Tigard were owner occupied. Approximately 50% of the single family homes in the Development Area are owner occupied, the remaining units are all rental. Therefor, only 4.5% of the housing units in the Development Area are owner occupied. The average assessed value of the single family residences in the Development Area is$70,500. However, this is a misleadingly high figure since the land value is abnormally high compared to the building value. The ratio of building to land value is only.70 (an average of$41,438 for land and$29,058 for improvements). Healthy single family neighborhoods have an average ratio of 1.3 to 1.6. Rents for both multi-family and single family units are low to moderate in the Development Area. 102.4 Employment There are 167 establishments (including public and religious) providing employment within the Development Area. Total employment provided in the Area as of February 1988 was estimated by the city to be 1,169. The major types of employment currently provided in the Development Area are: Communications - 14.37% (168); Nonprofit Organizations - 12.49% (146), Eating and Drinking establishments-8.47% (99), Local Transit-6.76% (79), Special Contractor-6.07% (71), and Miscellaneous Services -5.56% (65). These employment classifications account for over half of the employment currently provided in the area. 12 103. Property Values in Development Area Property values for land and improvements nave been compiled by City Planning Division staff for each separate tax lot within the Development Area.These values are for Fiscal Year 1987/88. A sample of 22 properties (13% of total)were chosen at random from within each of the 10 Tax Blocks within the area to track changes in total real estate assessed values over the past nine- year period. This survey showed a general increase in values during the 1980 through 1984 period with little change or some decrease in values, particularly among residential properties, from 1984 to 1989. The Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation, Commercial Appraisal Section, is currently (January, 1989) conducting physical reappraisals of all properties within the Development Area to establish new values as of January 1, 1989.In contacts with the Department it was reported that land values were highest on or adjacent to Pacific Highway (± $6/square foot); next highest for properties fronting on Main Street (± $4.80/square foot); and lowest for industrial-use properties not on either of these two major streets (± $2.80/square foot). 104. Impacts of the Plan in Light of Added Services or Increased Population Improvements to the street system in the area should reduce the City's costs of street maintenance. Similarly, the improvements to the street system should improve traffic flow which should, in turn, reduce fuel consumption, travel time, and air pollution. By encouraging the use of vacant or under-utilized land within the area,the assessed value base within the area should increase substantially.This improved assessed value base will benefit the overlapping taxing districts when the tax increment process is completed since they will then have a much higher assessed valuation within the Development Area upon which to levy taxes. Because the Plan will encourage the construction of some multi-family housing there will be an increase in the resident population of the area. The multi-family housing planned for the north bank of Fanno Creek Park is expected to eventually include as many as 500 units. This should translate to approximately 700 to 800 persons. As the Development Area is improved through implementation of the Plan, other residential developments may take place in other parts of the . area, thus the total population living in the Development Area could easily increase from the current 571 to 1,500 over the next fifteen years. Since it is expected that most of the housing units developed within the area will be multi-family, it is likely that the predominate residents will be single and two-person households, with fewer school age children than the average Tigard household. Thus the impact on local school enrollment should be minimal. Greater commercial and residential development as anticipated under the Plan will place some added demands on the City of Tigard Police Department in terms of patrol, and property crime and traffic/parking enforcement. Likewise, greater development will mean a potential increase in the demand for fire prevention and suppression by the Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District. However, for both the Police and Fire agencies, the anticipated demands created by implementation of the Plan should not require measurably larger budgets than could have reasonably been expected given the overall magnitude of growth and development anticipated over the next fifteen years throughout the entire City of Tigard and the entire Fire District. Additional discussion of financial impact is included in the section of this Report which details the impact of collecting tax increment proceeds on the tax rates of the eight overlapping taxing bodies. 13 105. Percent of City Represented in Development Area The City of Tigard has 6,460 total acres within its boundary. The Development Area has 186 acres or 2.88% of the total land area of the City. The total assessed value of the City of Tigard as of January 1, 1988 was$1,326,114,000.The valuation of property within the Development Area was approximately $35,000,000 or 2.64% of the total city valuation. Both the land area and assessed valuation of property within the Area are well within the statutory limitations of 25% for cities of Tigard's population. (ORS 457.420) C 14 SECTION 200. REASONS FOR SELECTION OF CITY CENTER AS THE DEVELOPMENT AREA The following defects ^d Inadequacies as described in Section 100 of this Report were found within the City Center area and are the reasons the area was selected as the Development Area. 1. The creek and floodplain create a barrier to both pedestrian and vehicle traffic. 2.The prevalence of non-conforming uses in the Development Area represents improper utilization of the land within the Development Area. 3. The Development Area exhibits an inefficient lotting pattern including small lots, land locked lots and lots whose shape inhibits development and use for Central Business District purposes. 4. Most streets in the City Center area do not meet full City standards including those for curbing, sidewalks, drainage and width. 5. Traffic Safety was found to be a problem in many parts of the City Center area. These problems included: narrow street and bridge widths. Additional traffic safety hazards include: ■ Lack of turn lanes on S.W. Hall ■ Sight Distance on S.W. Hall ▪ Sight Distance at S.W. Main and S.W. Bumham • Congestion in the post office area • Sharp curves on S.W. Scoffins • Turning conflicts on S.W. Scoffins • Bus turn movements on S.W. Commercial ■ Offset intersection at Scoffins and Hall/Hunzlker • RR crossing surface and signals 6. The lack of sidewalks throughout the area poses serious safety hazards for pedestrians. 7. Vehicle access into and through the Area is inhibited. 8. Inadequate storm drain placement and availability. C 15 C SECTION 300 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PROJECTS TO BE UNDERTAKEN UNDER THE PLAN AND EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE AREA The most significant projects within the Development Area, both in terms of moving the Area toward becoming a real Central Business District and allocation of funds, aro improvements to the street system.These projects improve access into the Area and to specific properties, enhance pedestrian and vehicular safety and upgrade the general appearance and attractiveness of the Area for its planned use. Full development of Fanno Creek Park and Tigard Square will create useful public open space which will help stimulate higher density residential development, additional commercial development and generally encourage greater numbers of people to use the Area. All projects are designed to help achieve goals set forth in the Urban Design Plan and the Development Plan for the City Center. Specific relationships of each project identified in the City Center Development Plan to five categories of "blighting conditions" are set forth in the following table. The five categories encompass existing deficiencies and inadequacies with the City Center and follow the categories defined in ORS 457.010 (1). Table 6 Existing Conditions* Plan Prole-et/Activity A B C D E 1 Main Street Bridge X 2 Main Street Reconstruction X X X 3 Pacific Highway Ramp X X 4 Tigard Street (part of Main) X X 5 Burnham Street X X X 6 Ash Avenue X X X X 7 Commercial Street X X X 8 Hall Boulevard X X X X 9 Scoffins Street (part of Ash) X X 10 Pacific Highway X 11 Fern Creek Park Development X X X 12 Mini-parks X X X 13 Entryways X X 14 Public Art X X 15 Parking Facilities X X X 16 Tigard Square X X X 17 Community Center X X 18 Towers X X 19 Public Restrooms X X X 20 Program Administration X X X X X 21 Building Rehabilitation Assistance X X 22 Relocation Assistance X 23 Pedestrian Weather Protection X X *Key to Existing Conditions: A = An economic dislocation, deterioration or disuse of property resulting from faulty planning (lack of CBD development, low land values off of Pacific Highway and Main St.) B = Laying out of property or lots in disregard of contours, drainage or other physl.at characteristics of the terrain and surrounding conditions (inadequate drainage, underutilized lots). C = Existence of inadequate streets and other rights-of-way, open spaces, and utilities (lack of improved streets, useable public open space). D = Existence of property or lots or other areas which are subject to inundation by water (inadequate storm drainage through railroad right-of-way.) E = Growing or total lack of proper utilization of areas resulting in a stagnant or unproductive use of land potentially useful and valuable for contributing to the public health, safety and welfare (non-conforming uses, vacant land, stagnant/declining assessed valuation, poor structure to land value ratios.) 16 Section 400. PROJECT ACTIVITIES -TIMING, FUNDING SOURCES & COSTS The selection of projects and activities was made by the City Center Plan Task Force after extensive review of City Center needs and recommended remedies in a number of specific areas. Street needs and projects ware initially 1..dentitled and discussed in joint meetings with the City's Transportation Committee and its consultant traffic planner, Kiittleson& Associates. Fanno Creek Park development is based directly on the City's Park Master Plan as prepared by Mirase & Associates in collaboration with the Parks and Recreation Board and, for Fanno Creek, also in conjunction with the City Center Task Force. Improvements related to urban design arise from the Task Force's work with consultants Bart Guthrie and Donald Stastney in preparation of the City Center Urban Design Plan. Factors which are currently inhibiting private activity appropriate to a central business district and steps which might provide positive incentives for development were reviewed by the Task Force in their discussion of the City Center Market Evaluation undertaken by Hobson and Associates and others. Other projects and activities come from the Task Force's work with Moore Breithaupt& Associates in developing a combined array of these projects,improvements and activities deemed most effective in correcting blighting conditions and achieving the goals of the Development Plan. 401. Timing, Description, Estimated Cost & Funding Source The projects and activities which are included in the Development Plan are more fully detailed here and placed into one of three five-year time periods based on (1) their relative importance to achieving Plan objectives; (2) their importance in providing the necessary support and incentives for private redevelopment and new private construction; and (3) the avaiiability of funding from tax increment revenues and other various funding sources.Following each summary of projects and activities (and their costs and funding sources) is a description of each project and its major components. The description is that of the project as conceived at the time of plan adoption, and has been used as the basis for estimating the cost of such project or activity.As the budget for each fiscal year of Development Agency activities is prepared, each project will be refined to more precisely accomplish Plan goals in light of then current conditions. This process will, in many cases, lead to some design changes and consequent changes in cost estimates. 17 401.A Table 7 Projects, Costa & Funding Sources Period: Fiscal Years 1991-1995 (Amounts in Thousands) Project/Activity Fundino Sources Total Cost 1. Building Renovation Assistance $ 90 Tax Increment $ 90 2. Bumham St. Realignment to Tigard/Main 700 Tax Increment 400 Special Assessments 1,100 3. Burnham/Hall Intersection turn lanes & traffic signal 130 Dept. of Transp. 130 4. Bumham St. Improvement (east to Hall) 100 Special Assessments 80 Tax Increment 180 5. Bumham St. Enhancements/Beautification 50 Tax Increment 50 6. Entryway, Landscaping, & Landmark Dev. 78 Tax Increment • 78 7. Fanno Creek Park Development - I & II 500 Parks Levy/Bond 20 State Parks Grant 360 Tax Increment 880 8. Hall & Pacific Hwy Intersection Improv. 250 Dept. of Transp. 250 9. Main St. Bridge & Burnham Intersection $700 G.O. Bonds Improvements 170 Tax Increment 870 10. Main Street, Phases III, IV & V 680 Tax Increment 680 11. Main Street Enhancements/BeautificatIon 100 Tax Increment 100 12. Parking Lot Dev. - Land & Improvements 100 Tax Increment 100 Period Total $4,508 C Period 1991-95 Revenue Summary Tax Increment Revenues $2,408 City's G.O. Street Bonds 700 State's Dept. of Transportation Six-Year Plan 380 • City Parks Levy and/or Bonds . 500 State Parks Grant (Land &Water) 20 Bumham Local Imp. Districts Assessments 500 Total Revenues $4,508 13 Period 1991-95 Project Descriptions 1. Building Renovation Assistance The Development Agency, with development of a low-interest loan program, would provide to qualifying businesses financial aid to assist and encourage structural renovations and improvements to enhance attractiveness and function of the buildings involved. Money suggested here could possibly be leveraged to provide for more significant loan amounts. 2. Burnham Street Realignment This is the realignment of Bumham Street to Tigard Street, 1050 lineal feet. The improvements consist of a 44-foot wide roadway with streetlights, a signal at Main Street and realigning Tigard Street from Hwy. 99W to Main Street. Acquisition of a 60-foot-wide right-of-way including any necessary buildings is included.Not included are any modified pedestrian crossings at Main Street or improvements to the existing Bumham Street. 3. Burnham-Hall intersection Installation of traffic signal, improvement of turn lanes to provide easier access from Hall onto Bumham. This is a state-financed project to be coordinated with Bumham i improvement and compatible with new boulevard design of Hall. 4. Burnham Street Improvement. This includes improvements to 1,300 lineal feet of Bumham to full width major collector standards. The improvements consist of pavement widening, resurfacing. sidewalks and streetlights to complete the existing roadway. Acquisition of a 60-foot right-of-way is included. 5. Burnham Street Enhancement Placement of features similar to those of Main Street along sections of realigned Bumham near Main to complement new retail development. 6. Entryway Development, Landscaping & LANDMARK STRUCTURES This project activity follows descriptions within the Urban Design Plan calling for special identity features at major entryways into the.Tigard City Center. Specific elements would be designed, budgeted and constructed as funds become available within the period from July, 1990 through June, 1995. C 19 7. Fanno Creek Development Description of Fanno Creek park development and its major elements is from the Parks Master Plan as follows. A. Asphalt Trail (8' wide, 3,270 LF.) B. Bridge Relocation C. General Riparian Planting D. Path Lighting (39 each) E. East Entry 1. Plaza Paving (1,250 Sq. Ft.) 2. Display Kiosk & Park Sign 3. Benches (4) 4. Trash Receptacles (2) 5. Riparian Plantings 6. Irrigation (15,000 Sq. Ft.) F. Meadow Development G. City Hall Water Garden 1. Pond Excavation 2. Weir 3. Arbor and Arbor Patio 4. Planting 5. Irrigation (33,000 Sq. Ft.) 6. Benches (7) 7. Picnic Tables (7) H. Main Street Plaza and Water Garden 1. Plaza a. 'Tigard Square'project includes elements largely b. Bellards-(8) replacing these three from the Parks Master Plan, c. Entty--Pottals--(2) leaving the Main St. connection as less prominent. d. Planting e. Plaza Creekside Steps and Weirs 2. Weirs (2) 3. Pond Excavation 4. Rough Grading 5. Irrigation 6. Planting (Water and Tea Garden) 7. Riparian Planting 8. South Bank Asphalt Trail (8' wide, 1,020 LF.) Costs from the Parks Plan estimate have been increased to cover inflation, contingencies and obtaining additional land through purchase of fee title, easements or development rights. Projects described in summary are based upon two or three annual construction segments beginning in spring/summer of 1990. 8. Hall & Pacific Highway Intersection Improvements This project, fully funded by the State is scheduled to occur in 1989. It includes widening of Hall on both sides of Highway 99W to permit added turn lanes plus related improvements to traffic signals. 20 9. Main Street Bridge & Bumham Intersection Improvements. This part of the Main Street Improvement includes bridge reconstruction to full pavement width with siddwalks, the reconstruction of pavement from the bridge westerly to Pacific Highway and the reconstruction of Burnham from its intersection with Main to the realigned Burnham (500 feet easterly from Main). Project includes a 28-foot roadway on 60 feet of right-of-way for Burnham and includes necessary property acquisition, sidewalks, street lighting and landscaping. 10. Main Street. Phases III, IV & V. Phase III includes improvements from the bridge to the railroad crossing, 800 lineal feet. Phase IV includes improvements to the railroad crossing consisting of relocating the signal and cross arms and improving the surface crossing with a rubberized surface. This phase does not include resurfacing the two Burlington Northern tracks which are scheduled to be improved by Burlington Northerr in the near future. Phase V includes improvements from the railroad crossing to the east end at Pacific Highway. 11. Main Street Enhancements Placement of architectural and landscaping enhancements such as benches, planters, pavement texturing, kiosks, along the busier portions of Main. 12. Parking Lot Development Development of strategically-placed public parking lots should take place within this first five- year period to meet existing and new demand for parking, primarily to serve customers of retail and service businesses. The proposed expenditure of $100,000 might provide for up to 40 off- street spaces in paved. lighted and landscaped lots depending upon location and time of acquisition and construction. 21 C 401.B Table 8 Projects, Costs & Funding Sources Period: Fiscal Years 1996-2000 (Amounts in Thousands) Project/Activity Fundina Source Total Cost* 1. Ash Ave. Impr. - Walnut to Bumham 2,00I. Assmts0City Bonds 5,200 2. Building Rehabilitation Assistance 60 Tax Increment 60 3. Commercial St. Impr. - Main to Hall 3LID. Assmts. 200 Tax Increment 500 4. Entryways, Landscaping, Public Art 60 Tax Increment 20 Private Grants SO 5. Fanno Park Development - Phase III (Master Plan H.9 - H.13) 252 Tax Increment 252 6. Pacific Highway Ramp to Tigard St. 5,600 Dept. of Transp. 5,600 7. Public Parking Structure - 500 cars 3,500 Tax Increment 3,500 8. Tigard Public Square Development $1,500 Tax Increment $ 1.500 Period Total ncre enTotal $16,692 *Note: Project costs reflect 4% per year inflation cost increase over current cost estimates Period 1996-200 Revenue Summary Tax Increment Revenues $ 5,652 City Capital Levy or Bond Issue 3,120 Commercial St. LI.D. Assmts 300 Ash Avenue LI.D. Assessments 2,000 State Dept. of Transportation 5,600 Private, State and/or Metro Arts Comm. Grants 20 Total Revenues $16,692 Note: It is estimated that about 60%of the Commercial St.improvements can be assessed to benefitted properties.Only about 40%of the Ash St.improvement can be assessed due to major expenditure on section bridging Fanno Creek Park. ( 22 Period 1996-2000 Project Descriptions 1. Ash Avenue Improvement. This Phase I includes improvements from Walnut Street to Burnham Street, 2450 lineal feet.The improvements consist of the signal revisions at Pacific Highway and Walnut Street, a separated roadway with a landscaped median and perimeter street trees, streetlights, connection to existing Ash Avenue,an elevated roadway over the floodplain and a abridge over Fanno Creek.Acquisition of a 75-foot wide right-of-way including any necessary buildings is included. Phase I does not include the median on the elevated roadway, improvements to Walnut Street at Pacific Hwy, or a signal at Burnham Street. The assumption is made that the Corps of Engineers' Permit will be granted without extensive administrative or engineering effort. 2. Building Rehabilitation Assistance. The Development Agency, with development of a low-interest loan program, would provide to qualifying businesses financial aid to assist and encourage structural renovations and improvements to enhance attractiveness and function of the buildings involved. Money suggested here could possibly be leveraged to provide for more significant loan amounts. 3. Commercial Street Improvement. This project includes reconstruction of the existing roadway, except for recent improvements,from Hall Blvd.to Main Street, 1450 lineal feet. Improvements consist of a 40-foot wide pavement with sidewalks and streetlights. No right-of-way acquisition is required for a 60-foot wide right-of-way. This project does not include pedestrian crossings at Main Street or signals at Main Street, Ash Avenue, or Hall Blvd. 4. Entryways, Landscaping, Public Art. Attainment of grants for art in public places through the Oregon Arts Commission or the Portland Metropolitan Arts Commission Is contemplated for parts of this project. Specific sites for sculpture, mosaics, murals or fountains would depend upon future location of major public spaces or buildings most suitable for such features.Tax increment funds can be used as 'matching"money and for enhancements at entryways and elsewhere. 5. Fanno Creek Park Development - Phase Ill. • This project for completion of the Parks Master Plan projects within the park includes the following elements: • H. 9. Tea House and Courtyard 10. Amphitheater 11. Water Jet 12. Pump at well 13. North Bank Asphalt Bicycle Path replaced C 23 6. Pacific Highway Ramp. This project, funded by Oregon Department of Transportation resources, would provide west- bound traffic easy access onto Tigard Street and the heart of the City Center commercial area. The City should work to secure this project as part of the State Highway Six Year Plan so that it might be funded and constructed during this second five-year period. improvements to Tigard Street and the Tigard-Main-Bumham intersection undertaken in the first five-year period of the Development Plan would be designed to accommodate traffic from this future access point. 7. Public Parking Structure. Construction of a multi-story public parking facility adjacent to Tigard Square is believed necessary to provide adequate parking for customers of;fie retail and service businesses and offices in the area and for persons using the community center and attending events held in the Square or Fanno Creek Park facilities. Development and implementation of a parking management program by the City is deemed desirable to achieve the most effective use of this structure and other public parking facilities. 8. Tigard Public Square. As discussed in the Tigard City Center Urban Design Plan, the public square would be created in the area near Main, Fanno Creek and Burnham. It would be a major open space serving as the focal point for commercial, cultural and social activity for the City Center Area. It would be tied physically or visually to Fanno Creek Park, be supported by adjacent shopping space, a community hall and a major public parking garage. Acquisition of necessary property and development of design features and landscaping are included in the estimated cost. • 24 401.0 Table 9 Projects, Costs & Funding Sources Period: Fiscal Years 2001-2005 (Amounts in Thousands) Project/Activity Funding Source Total Cost* i. Ash Avenue - Bumham to Hall via Scoffins $1,500 Assmts (Phases II & III) 2,500 Tax Increment $ 4,000 100 2. Building Rehabilitation Assistance 100 Tax Increment 3. Community Center Building 2,600 Tax Increment 2,6004,500 Dept. of Transp. 4. Hall Boulevard - Pacific Highway 2,000 LID. of Tran to Fanno Creek100 5. Pedestrian Weather Protection 100 Tax Increment g,500 2,000 Tax Increment 6. Public Art 29 Tax Increment 79 50 Grants & Donations 79 7. Public Parking Facilities 500 Tax Increment 5 500 8. Public Restroom Facilities 100 Tax Increment Period Total $15,979 *Note: Estimated costs for projects in this period include annual inflation factor of 4% over current year cost estimates. ( Period 2001-2005 Revenue Summary $ 7,929 Tax Increment Revenues State Dept. of Transportation 4,500 Local Improvement Dists.(LI.D.) Assmts 3,500 Arts Commission & Private Grants for Art $15,9790 5 ( 25 Period 2001-2005 Project Descriptions 1. Ash Avenue, Burnham to Hall via Scoffins (Phases ii and til). Ash Avenue Phase II includes improvements from Bumham Street to Commercial Street, 750 lineal feet. Improvements consist of a signal at Bumham Street, a 44-foot wide roadway with street trees, and streetlights and a railroad crossing. Acquisition of a 60-foot wide right-of-way including any necessary buildings is included.The assumption is made that the railroad crossing permit will be granted without extensive administrative or engineering effort. Ash Avenue Phase Ill includes improvements from Commercial Street to Hall Blvd. and the realignment of Scoffins Street, 1100 lineal feet. The improvements consist of modifications to the signal at Hall Blvd. and Hunziker Street, removal of the signal at Scoffins Street, street trees, streetlights and the realignment of Scoffins Street to Ash Avenue. Acquisition of a 60-foot wide right-of-way including any necessary buildings is included. 2. Building Rehabilitation Assistance. This is additional funding for the business renovation and improvement program described in the 1991-95 period. 3. Community Center Building. This project is for a 20,000 square-foot public facility to accommodate community meetings, special events, social activities, etc. Building would be located adjacent to Tigard Square. 4. Hall Boulevard-Pacific Highway to Fanno Creek. This project is a full street improvement of Hall including a landscaped median strip, turn lanes at intersections, signalization, street lighting, perimeter landscaping and sidewalks. Project is anticipated to receive up to half the cost from State Department of Transportation funding (not for median and added landscaping and right-of-way costs); up to $2,000,000 from assessments against benefitted properties and the balance from Development Area tax increment funding. 5. Pedestrian Weather Protection. Assistance to private property owners in areas of heavier pedestrian traffic to construct awnings, marquees or other roofing structure over sidewalks and other pedestrian ways. 6. Public Art. Added funding for placement of public art in indoor or outdoor public spaced within Development Area. 7. Public Parking Facilities. Estimated here are costs for acquiring land and developing lighted, paved, landscaped parking lots at locations to serve added parking needs related to future commercial development within the City Center. Costs estimated at $3003 to $3500 per space provided. 26 C 8. Public Restrooms. This project includes financing for needed public restrooms, preferably located within buildings such as shopping malls, community center or expanded civic center buildings. 402. Summary of Funding Sources Over the 16 year period in which projects and activities are to be accomplished, tax increment revenues constitute the most import funding source - providing 43% of needed project revenues in addition to funding interest on borrowed money and most of the administrative expenses.The following table shows major funding sources by 5 year period and for the 16-year Plan period. Table 10 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCE SUMMARY ($000's) Source 1991-95 % 1996-00 % 2001-05 % Total Tax Increment $2,408 53.4% $5,652 33.5% $7,929 49.6% $15,989 43.0% UD 500 11.1 2,300 13.8 3,500 21.9 6,300 17.0 Dept.of Trans. 380 8.4 5,600 33.5 4,500 28.2 10,480 28.2 Other 1.220 27.1 3.140 18.8 ..Q 0.3 4.410 11.9 $4,448 $16,892 $15,979 $37,319 C 27 • SECTION 500. FUNDS REQUIRED. TAX INCREMENT PROCESS AND YEAR OF AGENCY'S INDEBTEDNESS BEING SATISFIED. 501. Projections of Incremental Values and Revenues Th©following table shows projected Incremental revenue on an annual and a cumulative basis. The projection Is based on an assumption of no growth in valuation of existing properties during the period 1991 to 1994; 3% annual growth in now existing properties from 1995-1999; and 4% growth thereafter. During this period the value of new private development is added as It is projected for completion.A discussion of the assumptions used to project the composite tax rate used in the projection is included in Sub-section 601. of this Report. A description of the projected timing and scale of private development Is shown on Table 12. Table 11 Projected Tax Increment Revenues CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AREA - TIGARD Other District's TCV Growth Rate 01 = 2.00%(to 1994) 02= 3.00%(to 1999) 03= 4.00% Dev. District's ICY Growth Rate #1 = 0.00%(to 1994) 02= 3.00%(to 1999) 03= 4.00% Original Frozen Base TCV ; 535,000,000 Net Fiscal Projected Project Growth Over Annual T.I. Cumulative T.I Estat'd Projected TCV Year Dev.Area TCV Values* Frozen Base Revenue Revenue 1/ Tax Rate 2/ (No TI Value) 3/ 1989 35,000,000 0 0 0 0 524.30 65,947,241,000 1990 35,000,000 0 0 0 0 $26.09 67,266,185,820 1991 36,540,000 1,540,060 1,540,000 41,020 1992 40,300,000 •3,760,000 5,300,000 147,094 41,020 $27.18 68,611,509,536 168,114 $28.32 69,983,739,727 1993 44,215,000 3,915,000 9,215,000 266,767 454,881 $29.54 71,383,414,522 1994 47,280,000 3,065,000 12,280,000 361,032 815,913 530.00 72,811,082.812 1995 52,928,000 4,230,000 17,928,000 527,083 1,342,996 $30.00 74,995,415,296 1996 58,916,000 4,400,000 23,916,000 703,130 2,046,127 $30.00 77,245,277,755 - 1997 65,258,000 4,575,000 30,258,000 889,585 2,935,712 $30.00 79,562,636,088 1998 71,981,000 4,765,000 36,981,000 1,087,241 4,022,953 $30.00 81,949,515,171 1999 79,090,000 4,950,000 44,090,000 1,296,246 5,319,199 $30.00 84,408,000,626 2000 87,394,000 5,140,000 52,394,000 1,540,384 6,859,583 530.00 87,784,320,651 2001 96,245,000 5,355,000 61,245,000 1,800,603 8,660,186 $30.00 91,295,693,477 2002 105,665,000 5,570,000 70,665,000 2,077,551 10,737,737 $30.00 94,947,521,216 2003 115,667,000 5,775,000 80,667,000 2,371,610 13,109,347 $30.00 98,745,422,065 2004 126,319,000 6,025,000 91,319,000 2,684,779 15,794,125 $30.00 102,695,238,947 2005 137,637,000 6,265,000 102,637,000 3,017,5 8 18,811,6533 $30.00 106,803.048,505 2006 0 0 • See: Projected Building Activity Worksheet for project values detail. 1/ Tax increment Revenue attributable to Tax Rate, Valuation, and tax collection efficiency. 2/ Estimated Tax Rate in City Center Development Area 3/ Protection of True Cash Value excluding incremental value in the Development Area. • 28 C Table 12 Development Activity Worksheet City Center Development Area - Tigard Oregon Private Development Activity Worksheet Commercial Apartment Total Year Valuation\l Valuation\2 Added Value • 1990-91 1,540 0 1,540 1991-92 1,600 2,160 3,760 1992-93 1,670 2,245 3,915 1993-94* 730 2,335 3,065 1994-95 1,800 2,430 4,230 1995-96 1,875 2,525 4,400 1996-97 1,950 2,625 4,575 1997-98 2,030 2,735 4,765 1998-99 2,110 2,840 4,950 1999-00 2,190 2,950 5,140 2000-01 2,280 3,075 5,355 2001-02 2,370 3,200 5,570 2002-03 2,450 3,325 5,775 2003-04 2,565 3,460 6,025 2004-05 2,670 3,595 6,265 k( * Commercial Valuation for 1993-94 is $1,730,000 less $1,000,000 for Tigard Square land aquisition. \l. Based on 345,000 sq.ft. of new commercial development over the next 15 years with 145,000 being retail space; 200,000 sq.ft. being office. Initial value of $50/sq.ft. for retail; $80/sq.ft. for Class B office development gives an intitial weighted average of $67/sq.ft. for "Commercial" development. This cost times 23,000 sq.ft. per year is escalated at 4% annually to reflect increased building construction costs and hence assessed valuation. \2. Low-rise apartment developemnt of 560 new units is assumed for the area; much of it located along the Fanno Creek Park. Initial cost of $54,000 per unit assumed (average 900 sq.ft. at $60/sq.ft.) . Values escalate at 4% annually. 29 502. Cash Flow, Debt Repayment, and Year Debt is Satisfied. Table 13 shows the projected tax increment cash flow of the Agency. Included are the annual tax increment revenues and certain interest earnings as described Not inc!uriwi are Agency revenues from other sources such as grants, LI.D. assessments and Oregon Department of Transportation. The table shows the sufficiency of projected tax increment revenue to meet projected prolect costs by tha end of Fiscal Year 2004/05. 503. Finding of Financial Feasibility • Based upon the Project Cost and Timing information contained in Section 400, the projection of • Tax increment revenue in Sub-section 501, and the cash flow projection shown in Sub-section 502, the Plan is shown to be financially feasible of being substantially completed within the fifteen • years of tax increment use. Table 13 Projected Tax Increment Cash Flow CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AREA- TIGARD ANALYSIS OF: WOWING AND TAX INCREMENT DEBT RETIREMENT CAPACITY LAND SALE TOTAL \6 ---D/$RESERVE FUNDS Use of Increment BOND ACCUMLT,D\8 FISCAL TAX INTEREST AND OTHER T.A.50NOS PROJECT DEBT SERVICE PROGRAM NON-BOND COVERAGE BALANCE LESS YEAR INCREMENT EARNINGS\1 REVENUE 1,2 SOLD 13 EXPENDITURES PAYMENT BALANCE PAYMEUTS ADMIN. DEBT 1.6 RATIO%7 PROGRN ADMN. 1989 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- 0 1990 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- 0 1991 61,020 0 0 • 0 0 20,000 0 -- 21,020 19,2 147,0% 1,261 850,000 817,000 85,000 87,550 0 S0,000 69,000 140.09% 50,375 1993 266,767 3,023 115,000 92,803 105,000 50,000 115,000 256.068 50,163 1994 361,032 3,010 1,200,000 1,261,000 120,000 221,971 105,000 50,000 205,000 134.21% 54,207 1995 527,083 3,252 215,000 235,289 269,000 50,000 215,000 195.94% 50,542 1996 703,130 3,033 1,500,000 1,705,000 150,000 403,907 269,000 50,000 385,000 139.51% 52,705 1997 889,555 3,162 315,000 428,141 504,000 75,000 315,000 176.51% 51,453 1998 1,087,241 3,087 510,000 453,830 504,000 75,000 510,000 215.723 52,781 1999 1,296,266 3,167 2,150,000 2,612,000 215,000 702,509 504,000 75,000 720,000 134.74% 53,196 2000 1,540,384 3,192 516,.000 744,660 962,000 75,000 510,000 160.12% 49,769 2001 1,800,603 2,986 765,000 789,340 962,000 75,000 765,000 187.173 51,359 2002 2,077,551 3,082 1,070,000 836,700 962,000 50,000 1,070,000 215.96% 49,991 2003 2,371,610 2,999 1,360,000 886,902 962,000 50,000 1,360,000 266.532 52,600 2004 2,684,179 3,156 1,675,000 960,116 962,000 50,000 1,675,000 279.08% 53,535 2005 3,017,528 3,212 3,058,798 996,523 962,000 50,000 3,058,798 -- (0)19 18,811,653 61,622 0 5,700,000 15,988,798 570,000 8,032,000 045,000 10,972,798 11. Interest is assumed to accrue at 6%per year on prior year's balance. 12.Proceeds from land sales in 19•-. 13.Band issues are level debt serial at 7.5%; 01 w/term of 13 years; 62 r/ts .of 11 yesrs; F'3 N/tene of 9 years; 04 miters'of 6 years \4. Total project expenditures are net bond proceeds plus non-bard debt (see:f.n.6). \S. 10%of new bond proceeds applied to DER Mich scnaulates at 62 per year.Silence used to pay off bonds. 16.110.963 million in short tern debt (projects)paid from Debt Retirement Fund without long-term bonds. \7.A required coverage ratio of approxisately 1355 for Issuance of new bonds is assumed. W.Debt service has first call comma!in fund. Program Admini ion costs paid from find after provision for debt service annually. 19. funds In 0/5 Reserve Fund, applied to provide sufficient fads to gcy all debt service in last year. Poore Breithsupt L Assoc. Inc. ( 30 " SECTION 600 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING IMPACTS ON OVERLAPPING TAXING DISTRICTS 601. Taxing District Valuations, Levies, and Rates - History and Projections. A total of ten separate taxing bodies currently levy property taxes on property within the boundaries of the City Center Development Area.The following three tables show a 7-year history of Assessed Taxable Values, Tax Rates and Levies for each of these districts. Each table also shows a five year projection to the year 1993/94. Assessed values are assumed to increase at 2% annually for these 5 years. Levies are assumed to increase at rates based on their historical growth tempered by information obtained from interviews with the Districts.The individual growth rates assumed for each district are shown in the table. The projections of tax rates are based on the projected assessed values and projected levies - not on historical tax rates. Tax rates are shown in Table 16 growing to over$30 per$1,000 of assessed value by 1993/94. For purposes of projecting tax increment and the impact of tax increment financing, we have imposed a stop on increasing property tax rates at $30 per $1,000. Holding future tax rates at $30 is predicated on the following rationale: there will be some meaningful property tax relief provided as the State looks to either channel a greater share of income tax revenue into basic school support, an alternative revenue source to supplement property tax funding of schools is found, or the voters impose some limit on rates. Should this rationale prove incorrect, and rates continue to escalate beyond the$30 composite level, the effect will be to generate more tax increment revenue than shown at $30. If assessed value growth In the overlapping districts increases more rapidly than projected here, the effect will be to moderate tax rate increases. However, if assessed values increase due to greater growth and development or due to inflation, there will be upward pressure on levies, which in turn creates a counter-balancing push on tax rates. Table 14 Taxable Value of Overlapping Districts Historical and Projected I. TARASLE VALUE O9 OVERW►INO TASING DISTRICTS-CITY CENTER OEVEL0911EMT AREA tISGL TEARS 1982/03 TVROUCII 1993/94 (VALUE IN 5000'.) /fuel Tear 0.0.231 ESD CITY 5990 WATER DST. COUNTY USA PCC 90RT 530 82/63 1,373,330 7,368,917 685,964 1,409,543 716,964 7,368,917 5,906,357 7,368,515 7,368,917 7,368,917 83/84 1,477,010 7,784,970 775,325 5,506,897 766,000 7,872,899 6,317,974 7,872,091 7,872.091 7.202,836 84/05 1,581,624 8,345,497 852,749 1,611,959 825,334 8,440.533 6,775,139 8,440,533 8,440,533 7,722,217 05/54 1.690,243 9,240,304 906,369 1,702,836 067,332 9,341,197 7,577,686 7,344,197 9,341,197 8,585,074 56/57 1,752,957 9,587,380 957,117 1,769,696 956,453 9,690,720 7,093,387 9,690,728 9,490,728 8,744,259 87/88 1,051,542 9,096,732 1,176,773 1,577,525 996,685 10,000,571 8,121,679 10,000,571 10,000,571 9.232,789 55/09 1,993,117 10,291,176 1,326,114 2,016,014 1,086,474 10,390,328 8,424,316 10,398,328 10,398,328 9,615,046 Projected Growth rate .to 1994 2.005 89/90 2,032,979 10,497,000 1,352,636 2,056,334 1,108,203 10,606,295 5,592,802 10,606,295 10,606,295 9,807,347 90/91 2,073,639 10,706,940 1,379,689 2,097,461 1,130,360 10,818,420 5,764,658 10,818,420 10,818,420 10,003,494 91/92 2,115,112 10,921,071 ),407,283 2,139,410 1,152,975 11,034,759 5,939,952 11,034,709 11,034,789 10,203,564 92/93 2,157,414 11,139.500 1,435,471 2,182,196 .1,174.054 11,255,415 9,118,731 11,255,485 11,255,485 10,407,115 93/94 2,200,562 11,362,290 1,464,137 2,225,842 1,199,555 11,480,594 9,301,126 11,480,594 11,400,594 10,615.788 Coedited Icy:Moore 8tatt$agt 8 Associates,Its..from IMI.Co.Dept.AOsartnt 8 T0R6tten P6tetd5. Vote:Vetuotlans for Port of Portland,Portland Commadty College and Metropolitan Service District de not include•slustlans in Muitnad,end Clackamas~Cleo C 31 c Table 15 Imputed and Projected Levies Overlapping Taxing Districts I1. PR0PO310 REDEVEL0910NT AREA-CITY W TIGARD MUTED AND PROJECTED LEVIES-FISCAL TEARS 1982/83 16ROUGN 1993/94 Fiscal Tsar S.D.23J 130 CITY R99O DATER OST. COUNTY USA KC PORT 6S0 82/63 17.667,023 1,915,918 767,200 4,623,308 365,652 29,623,046 3.240,496 6,200,054 1,031,648 1,400,094 83/64 18.713,717 2.024,092 914,884 4,746,726 275,760 14,001,050 3,853,964 4,487,348 1.495,649 1,224.482 84/83 19,169,263 2,169,829 903,914 5.029.312 305,374 16,627.030 3.319.818 4,811.104 3,460,619 1,235,555 85/86 19,522,307 2,310,076 1,223,596 4,427,374 277,546 16.028,510 4,395.058 2,643,911 3,456.243 1,373,612 86/87 19,913,592 2,396,045 1,856,807 5,291,391 258,242 27,327,853 1,973,347 8,237,119 4,167,013 1,399,081 87/88 22,403,658 2,573,150 2.380,653 5,069.326 182,370 28,�605 2,0605 923,273 8,900.508 3,80,217 2,308,800,217 197 80/82 26,616,678 2,614,966 2,621.595 5.015./65 159.929 30, . S Ann.Growth 8.30% 5.603 22.70% 1.37% -12.90% 0.60% -1.20% 14.705 25.70% 15.40% Adjusted 8.00% 6.00% 8.00% 1.503 0.00% 4.00% 1.00% 6.00% 69/90 31,124,172 2,846,066 2,031,322 5,091,080 159,929 31,921,536 3,049,468 10,141,552 4,061,587 3,304,691 /91 33.614,106 3.016.030 3,057,828 5. ,447 159,929 33,198,397 3,079,962 10, ,04S 4.061587 3,304,691 91/92 36,303.235 3,197,840 3,302,454 7,1244.956 159,929 34.526.333 3,1 0,762 11,3955,047 t 061,367 3,304,691 92/93 93/94 42,344,093 3,593,093 3493 3,389,210 ,831,963 5,403,487 159633 ,929.37,343929 ,662 3387 ,175 288 12,603,475870 5 4,061,167 3587 ,304,691 691 Note:Nod on historical Valuations and Rates Table 16 Tax Rates - Historical & Projected Overlapping Taxing Districts - 131.PROPERTY 1AE RATES IN 9R090S10 REDEVLLW3E1T AREA-CITT 09 T1GA60 FISCAL TEARS 1902/43 TNROUGN 1993/94 Expressed as Este per 51,000 of Assessed Valuation FiscalKC 90111 MSD TOTAL Tear 3.0.23) ESO CITY 1990 WTER DST. CWOTY USA 82/03 13.01 0.26 1.12 3.26 0.31 4.02 0.55 0.57 0.14 0.19 123.65 03/84 12.67 0.26 1.18 3.15 0.36 1.88 0.61 0.17 0.19 0.17 121.04 84/83 12.12 0.26 1.06 3.12 0.37 1.97 0.49 0.37 0.41 0.16 520.53 65/36 11.55 0.2S 1.31 2.60 0.32 1.93 0.58 0.36 0.37 0.16 119.47 86/87 11.36 0.25 1.94 2.99 0.27 2.82 0.25 0.85 0.43 0.16 $21.32 108/09 14.46 0.26 1.96 2.49 0.15 2.95 0.36 0.92 0.39 0.34 524.30 City of Tigard $0.74 b9nd levy added in 1969/90 59/90 13.31 0.27 2.85 2.46 0.14 3.01 0.35 0.96 0.38 0.34 26.09 90/91 16.21 0.28 2.96 2.46 0.14 3.07 0.3S 0.99 0.38 0.33 27.18 91/92 17.16 0.29 3.08 2.45 0.14 3.13 0.35 1.03 0.37 0.32 28.32 93/94 19.24 0.32 3.33 2.43 • 0.13 3.25 0.34 1.12 0.35 0.31 30.62 . Dote:City Mord levy inclsded in 1969/90 Is mixed each year by same percentage as projected Assessed Value Mrsath. • 32 602. Development Area Valuation Relative to Districts' Valuations. The current taxable value of land, improvements, tangible personal property (that used in a business) and public utility property (gas, electric & telephone lines and facilities and railroad property) within the Development Area is estimated to be $35 million. A comparison of this valuation to the current valuation of each of the overlapping taxing districts is shown below. Table 17 Relationship of Development Area Valuation to Overlapping Districts District % Value within Development Area S.D. 23J 1.76% Educ. Serv. Dist. 0.34 City of Tigard 2.63 Tualatin Fire Dist. 1.73 Tigard Water Dist. 3.22 Washington County 0.33 United Sewerage Agency 0.42 Portland Comm. College 0.33 Port of Portland 0.08 Metro. Service Dist. 0.08 Source; Moore Breithaupt & Associates, Inc. 603. Analysis and Projection of Tax Rate Impacts As the incremental.valuation of properties within the Development Area grows,there will be some impact on the tax rates of some of the overlapping districts. The impact will be larger where the ratio of incremental value to the taxing district's valuation is larger and where the District's tax rate is higher. For the Port, Metro, PCC, USA, the ESD and the Tigard Water District,the impact is hardly measurable - less than a cent after fifteen years. Estimated tax rate impacts on the four taxing districts most impacted are shown below in Table 18. The total effect on the composite Tigard City tax rate is about 220 in Fiscal Year 1995, 550 in F.Y. 2000, 900 in F.Y. 2005 and a decrease of 910 in F.Y. 2006. Annual impacts are detailed in Tables 19 through 22. Table 18 Impacts on Tax Rates in Four Most Affected Districts (Cents per Thousand $ Valuation) District FY 1995 FY 2000 FY 2005 FY 2006* School District 23J 15.340 38.760 63.190 (64.04() City of Tigard 4.01 10.19 16.71 (16.94) Tualatin R.F.P.District 1.92 4.84 7.89 (7.99) Washington County 0.49 1.23 1_99 (2.021 Total 21.760 55.020 89.780 (90.990 *•Fiscal Year 2005/06 is the year when incremental revenues are released for use by overlapping taxing districts. All other factors being equal, tax rates would decreased by these amounts. Source: Summarized from Tables 19 through 22. C 33 Table 19 School District 23J Tax Rate Impact CITY CFJITER DEYELOME)1T AREA PROJECTED TAR IMACT ON S.D.23J S.O.23J TOY Growth Rate n• 2.004420 1994)A2• 3.004te 1999)93• 6.0042000$thereafter) Dor. 'a TCV Growth Rate n• 0.00%(2.1994)/2• 3.00%(te 1999)Ole 4.00%42000 6 Whereafter/ Orlfinel Frown Pee TCV• $35,000,000 Net --Gross Protected-- rict Fiscal projected Project Growth Over NMI T.I.ale.tiv 1/1308 tteat'2/(Pr jecteed ICV 3/ District 4/ ax Rotes/ Y•.r Dov-Are.'TOY Values• Proton Some Revst+le .1e.46 S0.0000 114.46 1,993.117,000 1990 35,000,000 0 0 0 0 815.31 2,032.979,340 815.31 10.0000 19901 36,540.00024,464 24,464• $16.21 2,073,638.927 816.22 10.0120 1992 40,300,000 1,540,000 5,340,000 113,593 817.16 2,115,111.705 817.20 00.0431 1992 44.2115.000 3,760,000 9,215,000 89,129 681 518.17 2,157,413,939 819.20 10.0779 1993 47,210,000 3,015.000 9,215,0008 231,542 S 9,223 819.24 2,200,562,218 019.35 80.1000 1994 52,928,000 4,230.000 12,200.000 338,036 $19.39 80.1534 1995 52,916,000 4,230,000 17,916.000 338,036 647.259 119.24 2,334,576,457 $19.44 80.1991 1997 60,918.000 4,500,000 30.258,000 570,521 1,268.720 $19.24 2,4X•613.751 819.49 10.2452 1997 61,981.000 4,765,000 36.956.000 697.284 2.066.005 819.24 2,476.752.164 119.53 10.2916 1999 71,090,000 4,750,000 44,090,000 031.326 3,397,330 019.24 2,551.752.728 819.58 80.3364 000 7,394,000 5,40,000 44,090,0004 971,899 3,397,330 019.24 2,653,096.918 119.63 80.3676 2000 87,394,000 5,140,000 61.294.000 104,787 5,340,036 819.24 2,759.220,7 4 $19.68 10.6368 2001 96,645,000 5,570,000 70,665,000 1,332.703 6,X,016 819.24 819.24 2.869.509.426 819.73 10.4856 2002 113,667.000 5,570,000 70.667.000 1,020,992 6,872,41941019.24 2,964,373.211 119.77 10.5X5 2003 126.319,000 5.025.000 91,319.000 2.520.992 8,393,412 619.62 10.5032 2004 137,337,000 6,265,000 02,637.000 1,935.241 12,050.291 819.24 3,123,798,060 119.87 10.6319 2006 143,642,000 6.268.000 102.142.000 1.935,60 lx,os3,490 819.24 3,357,013.968 019.23 (00.6404) 2006 X3,214,000 0 2oe,tu.o3o •Sae:Projected Wilding Activity Vcrbhest for project values detail. 1/ Tea Increment Revenue.ttribrtabte to Tea 8501. V.lumtien,and tee collection.ffi ctwcy. 3/ Pjectio Yew rte in Ic isrent 3/ Projectionotrue Cosh Value cited qIncr.sentst value In the Dtvele9ent Are.. 4/ Estimated Taw Rateas existence of Urban Renewal'reg . 5/ Estimated impact on tax rase due to Urben Renewal Prgren's use of Ircresental ugh,.G ravormas. 117 Table 20 City of Tigard Tax Rate Impact CITY CERTER DEVELOPMENT AREA PROJECTED TAR IMPACT pmt CI 71�. 7.00X(20 1999)J)S• 2.302(2030 1 thereafter) CITY Of ctTC Growth Rab e1• 3,001(te 1999)f3• 4.00142000&the Bev.District's TCV Growth Nota/1• D.OQ%(te 1994)R• Original Frozen lase In• $35,000,000 Net -.Gross Projected-. Vises( Projected Project Growth Over Armed T.l.Cueutatiw T.IEst.t'd Projected ICY- District Tu Nota e Har Day.Aroe ICY Values. fresco Soso Revenw Revenue 1/ Tax Rote 2/(No II Value)3/ Tu Rate 4/ ).pact 5/ 0 81.90 1,326,114.000 81.96 50.0000 1990 35,000,000 0 0 0 0 62.85 1,352,06.210 02.65 $0.0000 1990 31,000,000 0 0 0 4,467 92.96 1,379,689.006 52.96 80.0033 1991 400,300,000 3,760.000 5,300,000 4,598467 83.09 00.0116 1992 40,300,000 3,915,000 5,300,000 28.898 29.363 13.20 1,437,428,441 83.22 10.0207 1994 44,215,000 3,915,00006 2,280.000 40,0 89,438 53.33 1.465..0 0 13.36 50.0202 1994 52,228.000 4, 0,000 17,220,000 40,075 89,438 13.33 1,606. 53.37 10.0401 1996 58,916.000 4,230,000 23,916,000 58,047 225.991 63.33 1,306,061,121 53.38 10.0521 1996 65,250,000 4,170.000 30.918,000 98,744 324,991 83.33 1.599.702.904 33.S9 10.0642 1997 71,981,000 4,765,000 36,901,000 20,647 445,419 83.33 1,697,999.104 87.41 10.0764 1999 79,090,000 4,950,000 4,090,000 116,313 479,302 83.33 f7 33 1,697,336.077 83.02 10.0008 1999 89,390.000 6,140.000 44,090,000 170.963 x,20 83.33 1,760.229.520 83.43 10.1019 2000 96,20.000 5,145,000 61,394,000 170,967 960,155 03.44 10.1149 2001 96,60,000 5,570,000 70.665.000 10,867 960,152 83.33 1,909.272,249 53.46 10.1260 2003 115.667,000 5,775.000 10,666,000 26,249 1,190,760 83.33 1,900,643,139 83.47 50.1410 2003 126,319.000 6,725,000 01.319,000 263,249 1,752,019 13.33 2,065,068,165 3.46 10.1541 2004 137,319.000 6.265.000 02.637.000 234,944 12.052.919 14.33 2,2,147, ,619 53.50 10.1671 2006 137,642.000 6.266.000 10:.142.000 374.9 0 2,086,960 13.33 2,233.576,464 53.33 (10.1694) 2006 163.iK,000 G 147.147.000 3 •Soo:Projected Wilding Activity lieMdwst for prolan enclose detail. 1/ Tea increment Revenue attributable to Tea Rate•Valuation,and tax collection efficiency. 2/ Estimated Tax Rate in City Cantor Development Ares 3/ Projection 0 Tow Cash Value secluding(ncrowonal value in the OsvelCpee est Ares. 4/ Estimated Tea RKe seaming existence of When Renewal Proaraa. S/ E6(rtd impact an taw rate da to oris,Renewal Progrr's use 0 t,crwrsntef veto.8 revenues. 34 Table 21 çTualatin Rural Fire Protection District Tax Rate Impact CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT 606*MOJECTED TAX 119AC1 dN 114114111 FIRE'OISTIICT 11010 l TOY Growth Nate h• 2.00X(te 1994)92• 3.001440 1999)23• 4.0022000 E then after) Ow.District's TCV Growth Rate/1• 0.005(te 1994)112• 3.005(te 1999)/3• 4.0002000 6 thereafter) °Pilins(Frozen Saw ICS• $35,000,000 Net --Cr...Projected-- Fiscal Projected Project Growth Over Aural T.I.Goulette 1.1 Est t'd Projected TCV District Tax Matt Tear Dev.Aree TCV Valves• 'resin Now teem. Revenue 1/ Tax Rate 2/(No 11 Valw)3/ Tax Mete 4/ Impact 5/ 1969 35,000,000 0 0 0 0 62.49 2,016,014,000 $2.49 10.0000 1990 35,000,000 0 0 0 0 12.48 2,056,334,260 $2.40 $0.0000 1991 36,540,000 1,540,000 1,540,000 7,713 3,713 12.46 2,097,460,966 $2.46 60.0011 1992 40,300,000 3,760,000 5,300,000 12.725 16,43$ $2.45 2,139,410,115 $2.46 6).0061 1993 44,215,000 3,915,000 9,215,000 22,035 • 36,473 12.44 2,112,191,369 $2.45 60.0103 1994 47,200,000 3,065,000 12,210,000 29,244 67,716 12.43 2,225,842,356 12.44 10.0135 1995 52,928,000 4,230.000 17,925,000 42.695 110,410 $243 2.292,617,627 12.45 60.0192 1996 58,916,000 4,400,000 27,916,000 56,954 167,364 12.43 2,361,396,156 12.45 60.0249 1997 65,258,040 4.575.000 30,258.000 72,056 239,420 12.43 2,432,274,041 $2.46 10.0306 1998 71,951,000 4,765,000 36,961,000 88.067 327,487 52.43 2,505,205,182 12.47 10.0364 1999 79,090.000 4,950.000 44,090.000 104,996 432,483 12.43 2,510.361.337 12.47 10.0422 2000 87,394,000 5,140,000 52,394,000 124,771 557,254 $2.43 2,643,575,791 $2.48 $0.0484 2001 96,245,000 5,355,000 61,245,000 145,549 703,103 12.43 2,790,918,622 $2.48 10.0545 2002 105,665,000 5,570,000 70,665,000 168,262 871,384 $2.43 2,902,555,575 $2.49 10.0606 2003 115,667,000 5,775,000 80,667,000 192,100 1,063.485 12.43 3,01/,657,798 $2.50 10.0667 2004 126,319,000 6,025,000 91,319,000 217,467 1,280,952 44.43 3,139,404,110 12.50 10.0721 2005 137,637,000 6,265,000 102,637,000. 244,420 1,525,371 12.47 3,286,980,275 02.51 10.0789 2006 147,142,000 0 108,142,000 00 12.43• 3,395,579,486 12.43 ($0.0799) •See:Projected Wilding Activity Worksheet for project values detail. 1/ Tax Increment levena attributable to Tax Rate,Valuation,and tax collection efficiency. 2/ Estimated Tex Rate in City Center Develewmt Area 3/ Projection of True Girth Valla exctufin incremental value in Me Devetapent Area. 4/ Eetimeted Tax Nate attuning existence of Urban Newel Pre/rw. S/ titivated impact on tax rote due to Urban Renewal►rouge's we of incremental value 2 revenues. Table 22 Washington County Tax Rate Impact CITY CENTEI DEVFIOPMEN7 AREA PROJECTED TAX 114PACT ON 1501150T001 CQ2TT UASNIIGTON COTT TCS Growth Mate I1• 2.00X(te 104)92• 3.005(20 1999)13• 4.00X(7000 G thereafter) ' w • Deo.DI 's ICS Growth Mete 11• 0.0064te 1994)12. 3.00(te 1999)13. 4.0002000 1 thereafter) Original Frozen Base TCV• $35,000,000 Net --Gross Projected-- fiscal Project.( Project Growth Over Novel 11.1.Cumulative 9.1 1stnt'd Projected TCV District Tax Rate Year Dev.Area TCV Velwn• Frozen Safe teems Newest 1/ Tax Note 2/(Ne 11 Valve)3/ Tax late 4/ Impact S/ 1909 35,000,000 00 0 0 12.95 10,798,328,000 12.95 10.0000 1990 35,000,000 0 0 0 0 63.01 10,606,294,560 13.01 10.0000 101 36,540,000 1,540,000 1,540,000 4,633 4,473 65.07 10,818,420,451 $3.07 10.0004 102 40.300,000 3,760,000 5,300,000 16,257 20,890 $3.13 11,034,788,860 $3.13 10.0015 1993 44,215,000 3,915,000 0,215,000 28,008 49,695 13.19 11,255,484,07 $3.19 10.0026 1994 47,280,000 3,065,000 12,280,000 39,112 88,810 13.25 11,400,594,330 $3.25 10.0035 1995 52,928,000 4,230,000 17,928,000 57,101 143,911 $3.25 11,825,012,160 13.25 10.0049 1996 50,916,000 4,400,000 23,916,000 76,172 222,083 17.25 12,179,762,525 13.26 $0.0064 1997 65,258,000 4,571,000 30,258,000 96,372 318,455 $3.25 12,545,155,401 63.26 10.0079 1998 71,961,000 4,765,000 36,981,000 117,784 436,240 $3.25 12,921,510,063 13.26 16.0093 1999 79,090,000 4,950,000 44,090,000 140,427 576,666 03.25 13,309,155,365 13.25 10.0105 2000 87,394,000 5,140,000 52,394,000 166,875 743,541 $3.25 13,841,521,579 13.26 10.0123 2001 96,245,000 3,355,000 61,241,000 195,065 930.606 113.23 14,332,52,44.2 13.24 0.0139 2002 105,465,000 5,570,000 70,665,000 225,068 1,163,674 13.25 14,970,909,740 13.27 10.0154 2003 115.667,000 5,715.000 80,667,000 256,924 1,420,599 63.25 15,569,829,330 10.27 10.0169 2004 126,319,000 6.025,000 91,319,000 290,851 1,711,450 83.25 96,192,622,503 13.27 10.0184 2005 137,637,000 6,265,000 102,07,000 326,899 2,038,349 63.25 16,840,327,410 13.27 10.0199 2006 143,142,000 0 105,142,000 0 0 63.25 17,513,940,40 13.25 (50.0202) •See:Projected tending Activity Worksheet for project values detail. 1/ Tax Increment Leese attributable to Tax Rate,Valuation,end tax collection effitlency. ev 2/ [attested Tu Rate in City Center Deltptnt Arse 3/ Projection 0 Tee Cash Valve excluding incremental valw in the Develepont Area. 4/ Estieted Tex Mate asewins existence of Urban Newel Program. S/ (stimeted bent an tax rate due to Urban Newel Pregrem's we Of Incremental value 8 revenge. (I. 35 SECTION 700. RELOCATION REPORT 701. Relocation Analysis Acquisition of private property will be undertaken by the City and Development Agency in pursuit • of extending or improving streets, in developing Fanno Creek Park, in developing public parking facilities, in assisting private developers who encounter obstacles in pursuing appropriate new or expanded commercial or residential developments and for the proposed Tigard Public Square and Community Center. Existing businesses and residences (owner-occupied or housing tenants) where relocation will be required are anticipated to occur in 51 instances. They will require 8 business relocations, no owner occupied relocations, and 43 tenant relocations.Costs for such relocations are included • in total project cost estimates. Under payment schedules now existing in the governing Federal Uniform Relocation Act, displacees will be eligible as follows: Businesses: Actual moving costs plus up to$1,000 for professional assistance in locating suitable alternate sites. Tenants: Up to $5,250 (as of 4/2/89) to cover rental assistance and moving costs. Owner-Occupants (if any): Up to $22,500 (as of 4/2/89}to cover costs and "interest rate differential' (loans at higher rates than on current house) costs. Based on the estimated types and number of relocations that may be necessary in achieving goals of the Development Plan, an approximation of relocations costs is as follows: 8 businesses at $20,000 = $160,000 • (Tigard Square, Bumham Street Realignment, and Ash St. projects) 43 tenants at $5,250 = $225,750• (38 in Ash - Scoffins area; 5 other) 702. Relocation Methods The City Center Development Agency will adopt a resolution, establishing administrative rules relating to requirements for making relocation payments to persons displaced by City public improvement projects, and establishing eligibility procedures and appeal procedures. These regulations are intended to comply wit requirements of Oregon State Law governing relocation assistance to displaced persons and businesses. The Development Agency will prepare and maintain information in its office relating to the relocation program and procedures, including eligibility for and amounts of relocation payments, services available, and other relevant matters. 703. Housing Deletions & Additions There will be approximately one single family and 42 multi-family housing units eliminated through property acquisitions by the City or Development Agency over the term of the Plan within the • Development Area. No new single family residences will be permitted within the CBD Zone which • covers the Area. The construction of multifamily units will be encouraged, particularly adjacent to Fanno Creek Park. It is estimated that 500 to 600 apartment units will be constructed in the Area over the next 16 years. 36 • SECTION 800. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION The primary focus of citizen participation activities in the development of the renewal plan for the City Center has been the City Center Plan Task Force. This six member group was established by the City Council In November, 1987, and functioned continuously from then up to Council adoption of the Development Plan. There have been numerous public meetings of the Task Force during this 16 month period with interested citizens from both within and outside the study area in attendance at most of these work sessions.Working with major staff support from the City's Planning Division,the Task Force developed a thorough knowledge of the proposed development area as it currently exists•and an overall concept for what it should be in the future through the creation of a "Mission Statement." The thrust of this statement was to have the City Center function as a clearly identifiable center of Tigard's commercial, social, civic and cultural activity with a strong orientation to and flavor of the adjacent Fanno Creek Park. As the Task Force proceeded to developed specifics that would bring about the changes needed to move the City Center toward its desired future, it received assistance from consultant studies in five major areas: 1) Market Analysis 2) Fanno Creek Master Plan Development • 3) Transportation & Street Planning 4) Urban Design Plan 5) Urban Renewal & Financial Plan Development of park and street planswere also accomplished in cooperation with two other standing citizen advisory bodies of the City-the Tigard Park& Recreation Board and the Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee. During the fall of 1988 the Task Force held joint public meetings with these groups to review presentations by consultants and to discuss how features of proposed parks and streets plans related to city-wide goals as well as to goals for development of the City Center. For details of each plan see "Fanno Creek Master Plan," Mirase&Associates, .dated , 1988, and Tigard Transportation Plan, Kittleson & Associates, dated 1989. Other activities of the City Center Plan Task Force in achieving broader citizen input into its recommendations to City Council for the City Center Development Plan have included: • 3 breakfast/coffee meetings with Area business and property owners • 3 small group meetings with Area Business owners • 2 joint meetings with City Park and Recreation Board • 2 joint meetings with City Transportation Committee • Presentations to Water Board, Rotary, City Boards and Committees, Summerfield Civic Association, City neighborhood planning organizations • 10 newspaper articles during 16-month period • 2 city newsletter articles • 2 Chamber of Commerce newsletter articles • Informational booth at "Cruisin' Tigard' community event • Half-day community workshop on Vision Statement and market opportunities • Discussion topic in Fanno Creek Conference (annual city-wide community forum) • 2 questions on city center development included in Community-Wide Mail-in Survey • Maintaining a complete set of Task Force records in the local government section, Tigard City Ubrary 37 T T C., TIGARD CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN FINAL DRAFT allikk r r limi, 41 I „,,,_ .:;:f:!.:.----*:4t.” ...s#Ari ...G" •i!" • S 1111 4 # %4 V`4** I a C t> s# i *),A* v Q ,• V S s .." * • ‘'. \ i MI ,./i4t aill og Ellra C March 1, 1989 { T t.. TABLE OF CONTENTS 100. INTRODUCTION 1 • 200. DEFINITIONS 3 300. LEGAL BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION 7 400.MISSION STATEMENT AND GOALS OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN 10 500. LAND USE PLAN 15 600. DEVELOPMENT PLAN ACTIVITIES 18 700. FINANCING OF DEVELOPMENT PLAN INDEBTEDNESS 28 800. ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT REQUIRED 30 900. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION 31 1000. NON-DISCRIMINATION 32 1100. RECORDING OF PLAN 33 1200. PROCEDURES FOR CHANGES OR AMENDMENTS IN THE APPROVED CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN 34 1300. DURATION AND VALIDITY OF APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN 36 CI1Y OF T IGARD CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN SECTION 100. INTRODUCTION Tigard, like many other small cities near major central cities, experienced rapid growth and development during the 1950-1980 period. Small village-type retail centers, like those along Main Street, became just one of several commercial developments as new automobile-oriented shopping complexes and 'strip commercial" development occurred along and near major arterial streets and highways. In this process the former focal point or"downtown" represented by the Main Street area has been diluted. Much of the newer development in the Main Street area has not been consistent with retaining or enhancing a"downtown"focus or identity.The existing street system in and around the area has not been upgraded nor maintained in a condition to encourage new downtown-type businesses or expose the area to potential customers. The cumulative result of all these changes is an area that has been designated in city plans and zone maps as Central Business District but which has little of the character of such and too few of the physical facilities to encourage its becoming a Centras Business area. City Council, in recognition of this inconsistency, appointed a City Center Plan Task Force in 1987 to examine the situation and to recommend to the City Council steps to improve the area and enable Tigard to again have an identifiable City Center. The Task Force has been aided by considerable staff work plus consultant studies of transportation, parks, urban design, market analysis and financing. This City Center • Development Plan is the summation of the Task Force's work over the past 18 months, and incorporates most of the Task Force recommendations to the City Council. C 1 The Task Force envisions a future City Center of vitality and identity with a park-like atmosphere. The Plan has been prepared under the direction of the Task Force in conformity with certain provisions of state law contained in Article IX of the Oregon State Constitution and Chapter 457 of the Oregon Revised Statutes which enable this Development Plan to utilize helpful tools provided for in state law in pursuit of Plan objectives. 110. CITY, AGENCY AND ADVISORY COMMISSION The Governing Body (Council) of the City of Tigard on February 13, 1989, by Ordinance No. 89-05, declared that blighted areas exist within the City and that there is a need for an urban renewal agency to function within the City. The City Council, by approval of Ordinance No. 89-05, declared that all powers as provided by law in an urban renewal agency be exercised by the Council of the City of Tigard, acting as the urban renewal agency and that it be officially known as the City Center Development Agency. C The relationship between the City of Tigard, an Oregon Municipal Corporation, and the City Center Development Agency shall be as contemplated by Chapter 457 of the Oregon Revised Statutes. Nothing contained in this Plan, nor the City's supplying of services or personnel, nor the budgeting requirements of this Plan shall in any way be construed as departing from or disturbing the relationship contemplated by ORS Chapter 457. Further, the Council, in Ordinance 89-05, created a City Center Development Commission. The purpose of the Commission is to assist in implementation of this City Center Development Plan, to make recommendations to the City Center Development Agency, and to help inform Tigard's citizens, particularly persons doing business, owning property or residing in the City Center Development Area, of Plan's content and activities. 2 t SECTION 200. DEFINITIONS As used in this Plan, unless the courts require otherwise, the following definitions shall apply. 201. "ADVISORY COMMISSION" means the City Center Development Advisory Commission—a citizens committee consisting of from seven to 12 members appointed by the Tigard City Council. 202. "AGENCY" or 'DEVELOPMENT AGENCY" means the City Center Development Agency which, in accordance with provisions of Chapter 457 of the Oregon Revised Statutes, Is the designated Renewal Agency of the City of Tigard. 203. "AREA" or"DEVELOPMENT AREA" means the geographic area of the City which encompasses the City Center Development Area conceived pursuant to provisions of ORS Chapter 457 and as described in Section 300, herein. 204. "BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS" means the governing body of Washington County, Oregon. 205. "BLIGHTED AREAS" means areas which by reason of deterioration, faulty planning, inadequate or improper facilities,deleterious land use or the existence of unsafe structures or any combination of these factors, are detrimental to the safety, health or welfare or the community. A blighted area is characterized by the existence of one or more of the following conditions: A. The existence of buildings and structures, used or intended to be used for living, commercial, industrial or other purposes, or any combination of those uses, which are unfit or unsafe to occupy for those purposes because of any one or a combination of the following conditions: 1. Defective design and quality of physical construction; 2. Faulty interior arrangement and exterior spacing; 3. Overcrowding and a high density of population; 3 i f 4. Inadequate provision for ventilation,light, sanitation,open spaces and recreation facilities; or 5. Obsolescence, deterioration, dilapidation, mixed character or shifting of uses; B. An economic dislocation, deterioration or disuse of property resulting from faulty planning; C. The division or subdivision and sale of property or lots of irregular form and shape and inadequate size or dimensions for property usefulness and development; D. The layout of property or lots in disregard of contours, drainage and other physical characteristics of the terrain and surrounding conditions; E. The existence of inadequate streets and other rights-of-way, open spaces and utilities; F. The existence of property or lots or other areas which are subject to inundation by water; G. A prevalence of depreciated values, impaired investments and social and economic maladjustments to such an extent that the capacity to pay taxes is reduced and tax receipts are inadequate for the cost of public services rendered; H. A growing or total lack of proper utilization of areas, resulting in a stagnant and unproductive condition of land potentially useful and valuable for contributing to the public health, safety and welfare; or I. A loss of population and reduction of proper utilization of the area, resulting in its further deterioration and added costs to the taxpayer for the creation of new public facilities and services elsewhere. 206. "CITY" means the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. 207. "CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AREA" means the area as shown in the Map and as designated in the legal description found in Section 300 of this Plan. 4 208. "CITY COUNCIL"or"COUNCIL" means the governing body of the City of Tigard. 209. "COMPREHENSIVE PLAN" means the Land Use Plan of the City of Tigard including all of its policies, procedures and implementing provisions. 210. "COUNTY" means Washington County, Oregon. 211. "EXHIBIT" means an attachment of narrative, map or other graphic, to this Development Plan and contained herein. 212. "NEW PROJECT'means a project that either has a substantially different function than the project it replaces or has significant economic, environmental, so.ial, or physical impacts not previously considered by the Development Agency.Minor changes in design, function, or cost shall not constitute a " new project". 213. "ORS" means Oregon Revised Statutes (State Law). ORS 457 is the chapter which regulates the urban renewal of blighted areas within the State of Oregon. 214. "PLAN" or 'DEVELOPMENT PLAN" means the City Center Development Plan, an Urban Renewal Plan of the City of Tigard, Oregon prepared incompliance with Chapter 457 of the Oregon Revised Statutes. 215. "STATE" means the State of Oregon including its various departments, divisions and agencies. 216. 'TAX INCREMENT FINANCING" means a method of financing indebtedness incurred by the City Center Development Agency in preparing and implementing the Development Plan. Such Tax Increment method is authorized by ORS sections 457.420 through 457.450 and provides that the tax proceeds, if any, realized from an increase in the taxable assessed value of real, personal and public utility property within the Development Area above that existing on the County tax roll last equalized prior to the filing of this Plan with the County Assessor, shall be paid into a special fund of the Agency. Such special fund shall be used to pay the principal and interest on indebtedness incurred by the Agency in financing or refinancing the preparation and implementation of the approved Development Plan. 5 217. "TAXING BODY" means any of the public jurisdictions which levies ad valorem taxes within the boundaries of the Development Area. 218. "URBAN RENEWAL LAW" means Chapter 457 of the Oregon Revised Statutes as same exists on the effective date of this Urban Renewal Plan or as same may be amended from time-to-time by action of the Oregon Legislature. C 6 SECTION 300. LEGAL BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION 301. The legal description of the boundaries of the Development Area are: A tract of land in the southeast quarter of Section 35,Township 1 South, Ranoe 1 West, Willamette Meridian, and Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard,Washington County, Oregon, being described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 28, Chelsea Hill, a recorded plat, Washington County Plat Records;thence North 43°02'31"West, 235.81 feet to the most northerly corner of Lot 54, Chelsea Hill No. 2, a recorded Plat, Washington County Plat Records; thence South 42°58'08' West, 165.14 feet to the southwesterly right-of way line of SW Hill Street; thence North 43°36' West, on said southwesterly right-of way line and its northwesterly extension, 684.24 feet to the southeasterly line of Lot 20, Viewcrest Terrace, a recorded plat, Washington County Plat Records; thence North 38°25'05" East on said southeasterly line approximately 20 feet to the most easterly corner of said Lot 20; thence North 43°35'40' West, 455.22 feet to the most northerly corner of Lot 16, said Viewcrest Terrace; thence North 44°10' West, 546.0 feet to the southeasterly end of SW McKenzie Place (a 40' wide roadway dedicated to the public in Book 879, Page 212,Washington County Deed Records);thence South 45°55' West,26.68 feet to the most southerly corner of said SW McKenzie Place; thence North 44°07' West on the southwesterly line of said SW McKenzie Place and its northwesterly extension approximately 359 feet to he northwesterly right- of-way line of State Highway 99W (SW Pacific Highway); thence northeasterly, on said northwesterly right-of-way line, approximately 1735 feet to the most easterly corner of that parcel shown on County Survey #10102, Washington County Survey Records; thence northwesterly, on the northeasterly line of said parcel, 20.28 feet; thence continuing on said parcel boundary the following courses; northeasterly 11 feet, and North 52°08' West, 98.15 feet to the southwesterly right-of-way line of SW Tigard Street (County Road 767); thence North 65°49' West, on the southwesterly right-of-way line of said SW Tigard Street, approximately 785 feet to the southeasterly right-of-way line of SW Grant Avenue (County Road 1496); thence northeasterly, approximately 240 feet to the most westerly corner of Lot 7, Martell, a recorded plat, Washington County Survey Records; thence southeasterly, on the northeasterly right-of-way line SW Commercial Street, approximately 950 feet to the southeast line of the John Hicklin DLC No. 37; thence North 45°18' East on said DLC line, approximately 300 feet to the southerly right-of-way line of SW Center Street (County Road 972, being 40 feet wide); thence South 68°20' East,on said southerly right-of-way line, approximately 180 feet to the southwesterly extension of the southeasterly right- of-way line of SW Center Street (County Road 1365, being 50 feet in width); thence northeasterly, on said southeasterly right-of-way line, approximately 500 feet to the most westerly corner of Lot 7, Block 1, Kingston, a recorded plat, Washington County Plat Records;thence South 44°30' East(on the southwesterly line of said Lot 7),approximately 60 feet to the northerly right-of-way line of State Highway 99W (SW Pacific Highway); thence northeasterly on said northerly highway right-of-way line, approximately 1110 feet to the southerly extension of the east right-of-way line of SW Hall Boulevard at its point of intersection with the southerly right-of-way line of said State Highway 99W; thence southerly on the east right-of-way line of said SW Hall Boulevard, approximately 4380 feet to its intersection with the easterly extension of the south right-of-way line of SW Omara Street; thence westerly, on said south right-of-way line, 514.89 feet to the east right-of-way line of SW Edgewood Street; thence South 3°57'38" West, on 7 said east right-of-way line, 185.92 feet to the easterly extension of the south right- of-way line of SW Omara Street; thence North 875T West, on said south right- of-way line, 323 feet to the southerly extension of the east line of Chelsea Hill, a recorded plat, Washington County Plat Records; thence North 3°36'30" East, on said east line, 571.12 feet; thence North 65°54'27" East, on said east line, 571.12 feet;thence North 65°54'27"West 74.22 feet;thence South 48°00'32"West, 89.36 feet to the north right-of-way line of SW Chelsea Loop; thence,westerly on said north right-of-way line, on a 140 foot radius nontangent curve concave to the south (the chord bears North 78°37'14" West, 167.06 feet), thence North 62°27'01" West, 149.70 feet; thence South 75°00' West, 90.00 feet to the point of beginning. 301. Exhibit A. Map of Development Area which shows the area encompassed by the foregoing legal boundary description. r 8 PLAN EXHIBIT A CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AREA 1111 e i�y'II� .y , y s7. .i:-*,44}%.,÷..# I '*#4 '°' . 4.*N # ' *0 N / eSe- ---r: ,#### 4, N s . . lk * V • 4 4 .1,,- Y •.4& N' i I° r Il T ( 9 SECTION 400. MISSION STATEMENT AND GOALS OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN. 401. MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Development Agency is to strengthen the economic vitality of the City Center of Tigard by eliminating blighting conditions and to create a sense of place and identity as the "Heart of the City" - a vital center of social, cultural, economic and political activity. 402. GOALS To accomplish its mission the Development Agency will implement this City Center Development Plan, the goals of which are: A. To remove limitations to economic growth in the City Center area created by existing blighting conditions so that vacant and underdeveloped properties can realize their full market potential and be utilized to their highest and best use consistent with other goals of the City Center Development Plan; B. To encourage and enhance opportunities for commercial, residential and select industrial property to be developed and improved in the City Center with an emphasis on establishing a visible and economically active City Center. C. To encourage multi-family housing in the City Center to actively support commercial development,and add to visible people activities and movement associated with commercial, social, cultural and recreational activities in the City Center; 10 D. To retain and expand existing businesses in the City Center area to be compatible with the Development Plan; E. To provide pedestrian and vehicular transportation access and circulation systems which support development of the City Center in accordance with the Development Plan; F.To encourage a more efficient public transportation system to support the residential and employment population in the City Center; G. To ensure that infrastructure and other public facilities within the City Center are adequate and timely to accommodate current and future development; H.To provide a network of public and private open spaces adaptable to a wide variety of uses. Extend the network of open space from Fanno Creek Park throughout the City Center to develop the theme of"the City in the Park"; I.To create an atmosphere which is attractive and encourages investment in and occupance of business and residential properties in the City Center. ` 11 403. RELATIONSHIP OF PLAN TO LOCAL OBJECTIVES This Plan is intended to further the objectives of the City Comprehensive Plan. Further this Pian is intended to improve land uses, traffic flow, access to and from the Development Area, and improve streets, sewers, storm drain systems, park areas, public parking and other public facilities. 404. CONSISTENCY WITH CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This Plan has been prepared in total conformity with the City's adopted and acknowledged Comprehensive Plan including its goals, policies, procedures and implementing provisions. Comprehensive Plan policies which apply to this plan are as follows: Citizen Involvement 2.1.1. The City shall maintain an ongoing citizen involvement program and shall assure that citizens will be provided an opportunity to be involved in all phases of the planning process. Parks, Recreation and Open Space 3.5.3. The City shall designate the 100-year floodplain of Fanno Creek, its tributaries, and the Tualatin River as greenway, which will be the backbone of the open-space system. 3.5.4. The City shall provide an interconnected pedestrian/bikepath throughout the City. 3.6.1. Individual park sites, as defined by the Parks and Open Space standards and classification system shall be developed according to the following priorities: b. parks should be planned to insure maximum benefit tot eh greatest number of local residents. For this reason, acquisition and development of community level parks should be given the highest priority. 12 Economy 5.1.1. The City shall promote activities aimed at the diversification of the economic opportunities available to Tigard residents with particular emphasis placed on the local job market. 5.1.3. The City shall improve and enhance the portions of the Central Business District as the focal point for commercial, high density residential,business, civic, and professional activity creating a diversified and economically viable core area. Housing 6.1.1. The City shall provide an opportunity for a diversity of housing densities and residential types at various price and rent levels. Transportation 8.1.1. The City shall plan for a safe and efficient street and roadway system that meets current needs and anticipated future growth and development. Downtown 11.1.1. The redevelopment of downtown shall be accomplished in order to make it complementary to newer shopping areas. Convenience, appearance and the needs of the shopping public should be primary considerations. 11.2.1. Ash Avenue shall be extended across Fanno Creek, enabling access to the neighborhoods and commercial area without using Pacific Highway. Design features shall be used to slow traffic and make the street as safe as possible. Ash Avenue shall be designated as a minor collector in conformance with the 13 Master Street Plan. Design features and mitigation measures shall hold traffic volumes to the middle limits of a minor collector. 11.2.2. Improvements to S.W. Ash Avenue from S.W. Hill to Fanno Creek shall be constructed as a condition of development of adjacent properties.The street improvements along with the development of a major commercial site will increase traffic on Ash. A barricade shall be placed at Hill Street approximately at the end of the existing pavement to protect the neighborhood residents from the commercial traffic. 11.2.3. Method of mitigating the traffic impact on the neighborhood shall include, in the following order of improvement, construction: a. Improving S. W. McDonald Street to Interim Maintenance standards to encourage traffic from south of McDonald to use Mcdonald to exit to Hall and/or Pacific Highway. b. Improvements to the residential portion of Ash from Hifi to Frewing.these improvements could include limited parking, delineation of traffic lanes and sidewalks on one or both sides of the street. c. The extension of S. W. Hill to S.W. Omara and/or the improvement of S.W. Ash from Frewing to Garret. d. The extension of S.W. Omara to S.W. Hill parallel to S.W. Ash. e. Removal of the barricade in place on Ash Avenue at S.W. Hill. f. Improvement of S.W. Omara Street to interim maintenance standards to encourage an alternate route. 14 SECTION 500. LAND USE PLAN The use and development of all land within the City Center Development Plan shall comply with provisions of the City's Comprehensive Plan and all of its applicable implementing provisions. The Comprehensive PI-ri is the City's acknowledged Plan as required by State Law. 501. LAND USE DESIGNATIONS The land use designations of the City's Comprehensive Plan which affect the City Center Development Area are described on Exhibit B of this plan and are described in Chapter 18.66 of the City's Development Code, which is incorporated by reference. The purpose of the CBD zoning district is to provide for a concentrated, central commercial office and retail area which also provides civic, high density residential and mixed uses. The CBD zoning allows for 40 residential units per acre except within the area south of Fanno Creek, defined as follows: "All lands bounded by Fanno Creek, Hall Blvd., Omara, Ash Ave., and Hill Street shall be designated for 12 residential units per acre." The maximum height for residential uses is 60 feet. There are no floor/area ratios set forth in the CBD development code requirements for non-residential uses. Dimensional requirements allcw for building heights up to 80 feet. There are no lot area or width requirements and no minimum setbacks. 15 (- 502. COMPUANCE WITH CITY'S DEVELOPMENT CODES The City's Development Code including the Building and Safety Codes as they exist on the effective date of this Plan or as they may be amended from time to time, are hereby made a part of this Plan as though included herein in full. All development and redevelopment within the City Center Development Area shall comply with all provisions of the City's Development Codes including the Zoning, and Building and Safety Codes regarding maximum densities and building requirements. 503. LAND USE COMPUANCE The use, development or redevelopment of all land within the Development Area shall comply with the provisions of the City's Comprehensive Plan, implementing Ordinances, codes, policies, and regulations described in Sections 501 and 502 above. (_ ` 16 C PLAN EXHIBIT B City Center Designated Land Use /I e/ ® 3 � , '• • "� ° tell.:.-.:--e �r• vII,` ' ® ■% `r \\)--" 7 \.�V / 1 k(PDA) - ' f� 4• 4 4 ST. V 34 / Milk 1111 t I I IGARO g (PD)(AA) - CIVIC m -- �-- CENTER I. 4 l ). (PD)(AA) $Twact II, SECTION 600. DEVELOPMENT PLAN ACTIVITIES To achieve the goals and objectives of this Plan, the following projects and activities,subject to the availability of appropriate funding, may be undertaken by the Development Agency, or caused by it to be undertaken by others, in accordance with applicable Federal, State, County and City laws, policies and procedures, and in compliance with provisions of this Plan. Where project/activity descriptions include specifically named components, it is for identifying the type, quality or scale of the project or activity and is not meant to be all-inclusive. Details of projects will be laid out as specific projects are engineered, designed and budgeted. In the development of such detail the Agency will be guided by the objectives of this Plan and aided by elements of the City Center Urban Design Plan, the Fanno Creek Park Master Plan and similar studies and staff work. 601. DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROJECTS AND IMPROVEMENT ACTIVITIES The following projects, numbered 1 through 23, are hereby deemed necessary to eliminate blighting conditions and influences within the Development Area and necessary to make the Area usable for expanding existing businesses and other compatible uses rnd for the Area to be attractive for new businesses and multi- family residential development. All utility systems, streets and highways, bike and pedestrian paths, parks, public parking facilities, bridges and other public improvements shall be complete with all appurtenant and supporting parts,consistent with sound engineering principles and conforming with the standards of the City. With funds available to It, the Development Agency may fund in full, in part, or a proportionate share based on use and demand within the Development Area, the following projects. 18 STREETS AND TRAFFIC (listed alphabetically) 1. Ash Avenue. Extend and improve Ash Street from the south boundary of Development Area to its connection with Scoffins & Hunziker. Bridge Fanno Creek Park. 2. Burnham Street. Reality- and Improve westerly section to intersect Main Street opposite Tigard Street and improve to include landscaping, sidewalks, street furniture, decorative lighting standards to match or complement Main improvements. Improve balance of Burnham easterly to Hall Boulevard. 3. Commercial Street. Improve from Main to Hall. 4. Hall Boulevard. In conjunction with the ODOT, improve Hall Boulevard from Pacific Highway to Fanno Creek. Provide for landscaped median and special landscaping at both sides. 5. Main Street Bridae. Construct new bridge across Fanno Creek to be complementary to new park development and the reconstruction of Main - Street 6. Main Street. Reconstruct Main Street between its two intersections with Pacific Highway including new sidewalks, landscaping, street furniture, • decorative lighting standards, improved railroad crossing and special intersection treatment to improve pedestrian movement 7. Pacific Highway. Improve intersections through reconstruction and/or signalization to improve access into City Center Development Area. S. Pacific Highway Ramo. In conjunction with the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), construct ramp to permit southbound traffic on Route 99W to enter City Center via Tigard Street. 9. Scoffins Street Realign at intersection with Hall Boulevard and to accommodate the extension of Ash Avenue. 19 10. Tigard Street. Full improvement of Tigard from new ramp site to intersection with Main Street. PARKS. BEAUTIFICATION. ENTRYWAYS 11. Entryways. Develop highly visible, attractive entryways at key access points to City Center Area using landscaping, special structures, lighting, signage, etc. to achieve special identity. 12. Fanno Creek Park. Develop from Hall to Main in accordance with Master Plan. Acquire additional public park area as needed. 13. 'Mini-Parks' Provide for the development and maintenance of mini=parks,special landscaped areas adjacent to streets and pedestrian ways, particularly along Btrnham. Encourage private property owners to participate significantly in these projects. 14. Public Art. Provide for development of public art (sculpture, fountains, murals, mosaics, etc.)which can be viewed from plazas,walks or within ‘'- public buildings. OTHER PUBUC FACIUTIES 15. Community Center. Locate and develop a community center building on or adjacent to Tigard Square. 16. Landmarks. Provide for the construction of highly-visible vertical landmarks (bell towers, sculpture, observation towers, etc.) on or adjacent to Tigard. Square and near easterly end of Bumham in or near Civic Center expansion. 17. Parkins. Develop additional off-street public parking facilities to accommodate present and newly developed demand. Construct structures and develop surface lots to serve users of commercial and public facilities in the Main-Bumham area particularly. 20 18. Public Restrooms. Develop from several public restrooms to serve new k areas of public congregation, i.e. near park, Tigard Square, Main- Bumham, etc. Encourage such iac:Miles as part of public or private buildings rather than as free-standing structures. 19. Tigard Sauare. Acquire and develop a public plaza area to serve as a focal point for commercial development and public activity. PROGRAMS/ACTIVITIES 20. Building Rehabilitation Assistance.The Agency will budget available funds to establish and carry on a below-market interest loan program to assist and encourage rehabilitation, renovation or improvement of structures which add to the overall upgrading of the Development Area. Criteria for eligibility to apply for such loans and other program details will be established by the Agency. 21. Pedestrian Weather Protection. The Agency may, subject to availability of funds, establish and carry on a program designed to encourage the extension of buildings, marquees, awnings or other forms of weather protection over pedestrian ways in the more densely developed and used portions of the City Center. 22. Program Administration. The Agency will make provision, through development and adoption of an annual budget, for necessary management and supporting services adequate to coordinate project construction, program activities, marketing efforts and business development or redevelopment activities. 23. Relocation Assistance. The Agency will provide both technical and financial aid to occupants of property acquired by the City or Agency in C 21 I furtherance of Plan objectives or construction of public facilities within ems` the Development Area. 602. ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY A. AUTHORIZATION: It is the intent of this Plan to authorize the Development Agency to acquire property within the Development Area by any legal means to achieve the goals of this Plan, and specifically,to accomplish any of the projects listed in Section 601. of this Plan. Nothing stated in this subsection shall be construed to limit the present authority of the City of Tigard to acquire property for any public purpose. B. PROPERTY ACQUISITION POLICY: Prior to acquiring any specific property deemed necessary to achieve the goals listed in this Plan, the Agency shall prepare, adopt and maintain a Property Acquisition Policy which clearly sets forth the property acquisition program and procedures, including conditions under which property will be acquired, and other relevant matters. Adoption of the Property Acquisition Policy shall be processed as a minor change to the Plan under the provisions of Section 1201 of the Plan. The policy will be available to all interested parties at the Agency's office. C. ACQUISITION PROCEDURE: Pursuant to applicable state and local lows acquisitions shall proceed as follows: 1.) Where the property to be acquired is in conjunction with a project identified in Section 601 of the Plan and has been specifically identified in the City Center Development Agency's proposed acquisition policy then the acquisition 22 shall proceed through applicable state and local eminent domain procedures. 2.) Where the property to be acquired is a new project the acquisition shall be regarded as a substantial change and must comply with procedures set forth in Section 1202 of this Plan before acquisition can proceed under applicable state and local eminent domain procedures. 603. RELOCATION ACTIVITIES Should the development agency acquire property which is occupied and which would cause the displacement of the occupants, the Agency shall provide assistance to persons or businesses to be displaced. Such displacees will be contacted to determine their individual relocation needs. They will be provided information on available alternative building locations and will be given assistance in moving. All relocation activities will be undertaken and payments made in accordance with the requirements of ORS 281.045 - 281.105 and any other applicable laws or regulations. Relocation payments will be made as provided in ORS 281.060. Persons displaced from dwellings will be assisted to relocate in habitable, safe, and sanitary dwellings at costs or rents within their financial reach. Payment for moving expense will be made to businesses displaced. Prior to acquiring any property which will cause households, businesses, offices or other uses to be displaced, the Agency shall prepare, adopt, and maintain a Relocation Policy conforming to the provisions of ORS 281.045 - 281.105. Such policy will be available to interested parties at the Agency's office and will set forth the relocation program and procedures, including eligibility for and amounts of relocation payments, services available and other relevant matters. C 23 • 604. PROPERTY DISPOSITION AND REDEVELOPER OBLIGATIONS A. PROPERTY DISPOSITION. The Development Agency is authorized to dispose of, sell, lease, exchange, subdivide, transfer, assign, pledge, or encumber by mortgage, deed of trust, or otherwise any interest in real property which has been acquired by it in accordance with provisions of this Plan and with the terms and conditions set forth in a Disposition and Development Agreement mutually agreed to by all affected parties. All real property acquired by the Development Agency in the City Center Development Area, if any, shall be used or disposed of for development consistent with the uses permitted in this Plan.The Development Agency shall obtain fair re-use value for the specific uses to be permitted on the real property. Real property acquired by the Agency may be disposed of to any other public entity without cost to such other public entity, in accordance with provisions of this Plan.All persons and entities obtaining property from the Development Agency shall use the property for the purposes designated in this Plan or specified by the Agency and shall commence with complete development of the property within a period of time which the Development Agency fixes as reasonable, and shall comply with other conditions which the Development Agency deems necessary to carry out the objectives of this Plan. In the conveyance of any property, the Development Agency shall provide adequate safeguards to ensure that provisions of this Plan will be carried out to prevent the recurrence of incompatible uses or blight Leases, deeds, contracts, agreements, documents, and declarations of restrictions by the Development Agency may contain restrictions, covenants, covenants running with the land, rights of reverter, conditions precedent or subsequent, equitable servitudes, or any other provisions necessary to carry out this plan. 24 • B. REDEVELOPER'S OBUGATIONS. A Redeveloper is any public entity or private party who acquires property from the Development Agency. Any Redeveloper and its successors or assigns within the Development Area must comply with provisions of this Plan and with terms and conditions of the Disposition and Development Agreement. Among the provisions which the Agency may include within the Disposition and Development as requirements of the Redeveloper are the following: 1. Obtaining necessary approvals of proposed developments from all Federal,State and/or local agencies that may have jurisdiction on properties and facilities to be developed or redeveloped; 2. Development or redevelopment of such property in accordance with the land-use provisions and other requirements specified in this Plan; 3. Submittal of all plans and specifications for construction of improvements on the land to the Development Agency or such of its agents as the Agency may designate for review and approval prior to distribution to appropriate reviewing bodies as required by the City; 4. Reasonable time lines for commencing and completing the specified development of such property, 5. No execution of any agreement, lease, conveyance, or other instrument which contains restrictions upon the basis of age, race, color, religion, sex, marital status, or national origin in the sale, lease or occupancy of the property; 6. Maintenance of the developed and/or undeveloped property in a clean, neat, and safe condition. 25 605. BUILDING REHABILITATION LOAN FUND With funds available to it, the Development Agency may promulgate rules, guidelines, policies and establish a below market value loan fund for the rehabilitation and restoration of existing buildings located within the boundaries of the Development Area. Such loan fund is hereby deemed an appropriate adjunct to this Plan to eliminate blight and to further Plan objectives. 606. OWNER PARTICIPATION Property owners within the Development Area proposing to improve their properties and receiving assistance from the Development Agency shall do so in accordance with all applicable provisions of this Plan and with all applicable codes, ordinances, policies, plans and procedures of the City. 607. ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITIES A. The Development Agency may obtain its administrative support staff from the City and the City may provide the personnel necessary to staff the Agency on such terms and conditions as the Development Agency and the City may from time to time agree. In developing the staffing requirements of the Development Agency, the Development Agency will evaluate and make recommendations to the City regarding their personnel support needs.Development Agency staffing recommendations shall be included in the annual budget proposal of the Development Agency to the City. B. Further,the Development Agency may retain the services of independent professional people, firms, or organizations to provide technical services in such areas as legal, economic, financial, real estate, planning, engineering and any other skill deemed necessary by the Agency. C. The Development Agency may acquire, rent or lease office space and office furniture, equipment and facilities necessary for it to conduct its affairs in the management and implementation of this Plan. 26 D. The Development Agency may invest its reserve funds in interest-bearing accounts or securities consistent with provisions of City, State and Federal law. E. To implement this Plan, the Development Agency may borrow money, accept advances, loans or grants from any legal source, issue qualified redevelopment bonds, tax increment bonds, and may receive tax increment proceeds as provided for in Section 700 of this Plan. An affirmative vote by a majority of the then filled positions of the Development Agency shall be required for the Development Agency to issue any bonds. F. Authorization and Powers:Without limiting any other provision, power or authorization of this Plan, the Development Agency shall have all of the powers and responsibilities allowed under provisions of ORS Chapter 457 except as may be expressly limited by the City Council's approval of this Plan. 27 SECTION 700. FINANCING OF DEVELOPMENT PLAN INDEBTEDNESS The Development Agency may borrow money and accept advances, loans, grants and any other legal form of financial assistance from the Federal Government, the State, City, County, or other public body, or from any legal sources, public or private, for the purposes of undertaking and carrying out this Plan, or may otherwise obtain financing as authorized by ORS Chapter 457. 701. SELF LIQUIDATION OF COSTS OF URBAN RENEWAL INDEBTEDNESS (TAX INCREMENT FINANCING). Projects and activities of the Agency may be financed, in whole or in part, by self-liquidation of the costs of renewal activities as provided in ORS 457.420 through 457.450.The ad valorem taxes, if any, levied by a taxing body upon the taxable real and personal property situated in the Development Area shall be divided as provided in ORS 457.440. That portion of the taxes representing the levy against the increase, if any, in the assessed value of property located in the Development Area over the assessed vaiue specified in the certificate filed under ORS 457.430, shall, after collection by the tax collector, be paid into a special fund of the Development Agency and shall be used to pay principal and interest on any indebtedness incurred by the Agency to finance or refinance this Plan and any projects or activities authorized and undertaken pursuant to provisions of this Plan. Upon completion of the projects and activities identified in this Plan or subsequent amendments to this Plan, and the satisfaction of all outstanding Agency indebtedness, the division of taxes under ORS 457.420 - 456.450 shall cease as provided by ORS 457.450. 28 702. PRIOR INDEBTEDNESS Any indebtedness permitted by law and incurred by the Agency, or the City in connection with preplanning for this Development Plan may be repaid from Development Agency funds when and if such funds are available. 703. ANNUAL BUDGET The Development Agency shall adopt and use a fiscal year ending June 30. Each year, by July 1, the City Council shall adopt a budget for the Development Agency in conformance with provisions of ORS 294 (the local Budget Law) and ORS 457.460 which shall describe its sources of revenue, proposed expenditures and activities. The Development Agency shall submit its proposed budget to the City's Budget Committee for its review and approval and such Agency shall not undertake any activities nor expend any funds except as provided in the budget approved by the City Council. (' 29 SECTION 800. ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT REQUIRED 801. REQUIRED FINANCIAL STATEMENT ORS Section 457.4,93 requires that the Development Agency, by August 1 of each year, prepare a statement containing: A. The amount of tax increment revenues(ORS 440(4))preceding fiscal year and from indebtedness incurred by ORS 457.440(6); B. The purpose and amounts for which such money were expended during the preceding fiscal year; C. An estimate of tax increment monies to be received during the current fiscal year and from indebtedness incurred under ORS 457.440(6); D. A budget setting forth the purposes and estimated amounts for which all such monies are to be expanded during the current fiscal year, and E. An analysis of the impact, if any, of carrying out the Development Plan on the tax rate for the preceding year for all taxing bodies included under OR 457.430; the ane e...�.rt.... 457.460 F. If the August 1 deadline to met provisions of S Section is changed by the legislature, then the Agency will conform to the new date to prepare the requirement statement. 802. STATEMENT FILED AND PUBLISHED The statement required by subsection 801 shall be filed with the City Council and notice shall be published as provided by state law that the statement has been prepared and is on file with the City and with the Development Agency and the information contained in the statement is available to all interested persons.The notice shall summarize the required information as set forth in subsection 801 herein. 30 SECTION 900. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION The activities and projects identified in this Pian, the development of subsequent plans, procedures, activities and regulations,and the adoption of amendments to this Plan shall be undertaken with the participation of citizens, owners and tenants as individuals and organizations who reside within or who have financial interest within the City Center Development Area and with the general citizens of the City. For this purpose the City Council established the City Center Plan Task Force to advise and assist in the details and preparation of this Plan. The Council has also established the City Center Development Advisory Commission to advise and assist it and the Development Agency In implementation of and any future amendments to this Plan. C 31 SECTION 1000. NON-DISCRIMINATION In the preparation, adoption and implementation of this Plan, no public official or private '. party shall take any action or cause any persons, group organization to be discriminated against on the basis of age, race, color, religion, sex, marital status or national origin. C ``` 32 SECTION 1100. RECORDING OF PLAN A copy of the City Council's ordinance adopting this Plan under ORS 457.095 shall be sent by the Council to the Development Agency. Following approval of this Plan as required by the City Charter, the Agency will have the Plan recorded with the Recording Officer or Washington County. I • 33 SECTION 1200. PROCEDURES FOR CHANGES OR AMENDMENTS IN THE APPROVED CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN This Plan will be reviewed and analyzed periodically and will continue to evolve during the course of its implementation. The Plan may be changed, clarified, modified or amended as future conditions may warrant. Where, in the judgment of the Development Agency as guided by the definitions and criteria contained in this Plan, the proposed modification will substantially change the Plan, the modification must be duly approved by the City Council in the same manner as the original Plan before the change can be implemented as guided by definitions and criteria outlined in Sect. 1202. 1201. MINOR CHANGES Any change that is not a substantial change, as defined in §1202, shall be proposed by resolution of the Development Agency in which the details of the minor change or changes shall be described. 1202. SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES Substantial changes to this Plan, if any, shall be approved in the same manner as the original Plan, pursuant to ORS 457.095 and ORS 457.220. Substantial changes to this Plan shall include the following: A. An increase or decrease of land area within the boundaries of the development area; B. An increase in the effective period of this Plan, as described in §1301; C. The addition of any new project, not otherwise identified in the current Plan. The Development Agency shall determine whether a project is a "new project," pursuant to §200. 1203. AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR TO ANY OF ITS IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCES: IMPACT ON DEVELOPMENT PLAN From time-to-time during the implementation of this Development Plan, the Planning Commission and the City Council of the City of Tigard may officially 34 C approve amendments or modifications to the City's Comprehensive Plan and implementing ordinances. Furthermore, the City Council may from time-to-time amend or approve new building, Health and Safety Codes which affect the implementation of this Development Plan. When such amendments, modifications, or approvals have been officially enacted by the City Council, such amendments, modifications, or approvals which affect the provisions of this Plan shall, by reference, become a part of this Plan as if such amendments, modifications, or approvals were fully stated in the Plan. The City Council shall forward to the Development Agency copies of council actions described above, and the Development Agency shall prepare and approve a resolution recognizing that such changes constitute minor changes to this Plan, as provided for in §1201 above. The minor changes described in this section shall not effectively amend the Development Plan until such time as the �.. Development Agency's resolution becomes final. r 35 C SECTION 1300. DURATION AND VAUDITY OF APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1301 DURATION OF DEVELOPMENT PLAN This Plan shall remain in full force and effect for a period of not more than sixteen (16) years from the effective date of this Plan or from July 1,1990, whichever date is later. Any extension beyond sixteen (16) years shall require an authorized extension and shall be considered as a substantial change pursuant to Section 1203. 1302 VAUDITY Should a court of competent Jurisdiction find any word, clause, sentence,section or part of this Plan to be invalid, the remaining words, clauses, sentences, sections or parts shall be unaffected by such finding and shall remain in full force and effect for the time period described in subsection 1301 and 701. C 36 . g CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON • COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY AGENDA OF: April 10, 1989 DATE SUBMITTED: March 30, 1989 ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE: Call For PREVIOUS ACTION: Election on City Center Development Plan ,' PREPARED BY: Elizabeth Ann Newton C;Wri DEPT HEAD L CITY ADMIN 0 jr,/ REQUESTED BY: -= 3- PO'ICY ISSUE Shall the Council call for an election on the City Center Development Plan and Funding? INFORMATION SUMMARY As outlined in the attached resolution calling for a May election, the current City charter requires approval by the voters prior to the activation or implementation of tax increment financing as a method of funding activities set forth in the City Center Development Plan. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Approve the attached resolution calling for an election on the May or- ballot. 2. Revise the resolution. 3. Postpone setting the election to a later date. FISCAL IMPACT The possible impact of tax increment financing on the composite tax rate and affected taxing jurisdictions is outlined in the City Center Development Report. SUGGESTED ACTION Adopt the attached resolution calling for a vote on the City Center Development Plan and funding methods on the May ballot. br/9483D 4 . CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON 4r. RESOLUTION NO. 89- A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL CATLLING FOR A SPECIAL ELECTION TO SUBMIT TO THE REGISTERED, QUALIFIED VOTERS OF THE CITY THE CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE AUTHORITY TO USE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING AS A METHOD OF FUNDING ACTIVITIES SET FORTH IN THE PLAN. WHEREAS, the City Council held public hearings to consider the City Center Development Plan on March 27, and April 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted an ordinance approving the City Center Development Plan on April 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Charter of the City of Tigard contains a provision prohibiting the activation or implementation of tax increment financing as a method of paying the debts and obligations of an agency established under the provisions of ORS 457 without approval of the voters of the city at a regular or special city election held in May or November. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: Section 1. An election is hereby called to be held in the City of Tigard on the 16th day of May, 1989, between the hours of 7:00 AM and 8:00 PM Pacific Daylight Time at the polling places designated in Exhibit "A" for the purpose of submitting to the registered, Qualified voters of the City of Tigard the proposition set forth in Section 2 below. Section 2. The following ballot title and explanation is hereby approved and the following measure shall be printed upon the official ballot as set forth below. ############################################################################## CAPTION: TIGARD CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN QUESTION: SHALL THE TIGARD CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN BE APPROVED? EXPLANATION: This Plan would enhance the business and development potential of downtown Tigard by improving streets, parking, parks, and other public facilities and by operating special redevelopment programs within the downtown area. This measure does not authorize new or additional taxes. Property tax revenue received on any newly created value ("tax increment" revenue) will be used to pay for a portion of the public costs associated with the projects and programs outlined in the Plan. ############################################################################## 4 Section 3. The City Recorder is hereby authorized and directed to certify in the manner provided by law to the Elections Director of Washington County, Oregon, the foregoing measure for inclusion as a part of the regular ballots to be prepared by such Director for voting at all precincts within the City of Tigard, as set forth in Exhibit "A" herein, at the Special Election of May 16, 1989. Section 4. The Tigard City Recorder shall be, and is hereby authorized and directed to undertake all necessary and convenient acts to facilitate the inclusion of this measure on the May 16, 1989 Special Election ballot for the approval or rejection of the qualified voters of the City of Tigard and is further pawl byed anpublishing directed tonceo in givenotice Tigard Times on April ove described 1989 election as and proposal p 9 required by ORS 250.275. PASSED: This day of , 1989. Mayor - City of Tigard ATTEST: Deputy City Recorder - City of Tigard APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Recorder -s--$9 Date EXHIBIT "A" Following is a list of precinct numbers and polling places as provided by ( Washington County Election Division. The official polling place may change should the Election Division find it necessary to modify boundaries of the precincts in accordance with State law. PRECINCT NUMBER POLLING PLACE 16 Metzger Elementary School, 10255 SW 90th, Tigard 30 Tigard Community Center, 12495 SW Ash, Tigard 31 Charles F. Tigard School, 12985 SW Grant, Tigard 32 Charles F. Tigard School, 12985 SW Grant, Tigard 33 Fowler Jr. High School, 10865 SW Walnut, Tigard 34 James Templeton School, 9500 SW Murdock, Tigard 35 Phil Lewis School, 12615 SW 72nd, Tigard 40 Twality Jr. High School, 14650 SW 97th, Tigard 41 Summerfield Club House, 10650 SW Summerfield Dr. , Tigard 46 Mary Woodward Elementary School, 12325 SW Katherine, Tigard 180 Summerfield Club House, 10650 SW Summerfield Dr. , Tigard 192 Maison Armory, 6700_RW Oak Street, Tigard 194 Tigard Community Center, 12495 SW Ash, Tigard 195 USA Durham Facility, 16580 SW 85th Tigard, 215 Charles F. Tigard School, 12985 SW Grant, Tigard 217 Metzger Elementary School, 10255 SW 90th, Tigard 221 Mary Woodward Elementary School, 12325 SW Katherine, Tigard 224 Fowler Jr. High School, 10865 SW Walnut, Tigard 225 Summerfield Club House, 10650 SW Summerfield Dr. , Tigard 226 Mary Woodward Elementary School, 12325 SW Katherine, Tigard C Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 89- C. ;C Pram the desk of. PEGGY WESTON BYRD _ 62,e46 /D /959' d&-„e`72--i2„.d.,L-2. Ege,,y_f_,?,es___ 0_,42i J t ,I, tza. ' e, , 12,(4 4 it.c 4 f--ii, j, - 5 -. , , . - /lea e 5� �. ,O I / az' t wpm ;„1,77/t4 fijteAeWLy V-4th (-66(- 1-1-7, . 1 ,i1/ -1,t(A./( r-P 01-2 , ' Cer7/07 - 7 Aeril' ; '92r6iiiir ,/ .': lir n i 1 }, TIGARD AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 1 - 12420 S.W.MAIN ST.,TIGARD,OR 97223 (503)639-1656 } y TIGARD AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 12420 S.W. MAIN ST.,TIGARD,OR 97223 (503)639-1656 Apri1 10, 1989 Mayor Gerald Edwards and City Council City of Tigard PO Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mayor Edwards & Council : The Board of Directors of the Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce has voted to support the adoption by the City Council of the City Center Plan as ordinance and the Report as resolution. Our support, therefore, extends to Tax Increment Financing which will be on the ballot in an upcoming election. Many Tigard businesses have made significant investments in the City Center. Public improvements are needed to encourage future private investment. Some of these include traffic circulation, road and intersection improvements, parking, replacement of the bridge and railroad crossing, sidewalks, lighting and beautification. These are essential to improving the economic health of the City Center. The Chamber has monitored the progress of the City Center Plan for the past 21 months and will continue to do so during the implementation of the projects outlined in the Plan and Report. We are particularly interested in the city moving promptly to let businesses know specifics in zoning, roadway plans and relocation policies. Much of the unrest among City Center businesses over the plan and report is due to uncertainties in these areas. Businesses, property owners and residents alike need to know specifics as soon as possible in order to make decisions. The Chamber is vitally interested in not only the outcome of the city's decisions in these areas, but also in having input during the process of developing policies. We feel that the entire community will benefit as public and private investment adds value and brings more business, vibrancy and a sense of place and community to the city center which is not currently living up to its economic potential. Sincerely, S ey Hi 16 P esident