Loading...
Specifications ST)-O/ c.)c e ,?I .S75 1/57.-fri-Cti vi 6975 SW SANDBURG ST#160 TIGARD,OR 97223 STRUCTURAL Lac (971)371-1958 JAN 3 0 2017 CITY OF TIGAR 9 BUILDING DI STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONSVISION Putzier Residence Underpinning 13799 SW Benchview Terrace Tigard, OR 97223 Prepared for Terrafirma Foundation Systems i.e.Structural Job# S101-324 Op k' 4' GINE49 kix E ��O 3626 1111.1.-ORGON 44:c. 21,VNI:e oi6 Project: Putzier Residence Underpinning Sheet: 1 ft -" Client: Terrafirma Foundation Systems Date: 1/27/2017 Job#: S101-324 Revised: J "" ` Subject: Structural Narrative and Design Criteria By: RWV STRUCTURAL NARRATIVE The purpose of the proposed underpinning work is to stabilize a column on the south side of the building to improve the serviceability of the existing structure.This calculation package provides the engineering required to show conformance to all referenced codes for the underpinning system consisting of Foundation Supportworks model 288 helical piers.The system utilizes a bracket assembly and round steel tube sections ! augered into the earth to transfer loads from the structure to load bearing stratum below. It is notable that this work is voluntary in nature,and is not mandated by building code requirements.The remainder of the structure is beyond i.e.Structural's scope of work. There is no ICC-ES report currently approved for underpinning systems within seismic zone D,thus the entire underpinning system has been reviewed and analyzed as a fully engineered system complying with all current codes and stamped by a licensed design professional.Applicable requirements per the International Building Code 2012(IBC)including,deep foundation guidelines, load combinations,special inspection and testing requirements are included in this document.Bracket fabrication and welding is completed by Behlen Mfg.Co. in conformance to AWS D1.1.The Contractor's means and methods of installation are beyond the scope of these calculations. DESIGN CRITERIA Building Department: City of Tigard Building Codes: 2012 International Building Code(IBC) 2014 Oregon Structural Specialty Code(OSSC) Design Loads: Concrete Unit Weight 150 pcf Porch Dead Load 50 psf Roof Dead Load 20 psf Porch Live Load 40 psf Wall Dead Load 10 psf Snow Load 20 psf Governing Load Combinations: 1.2D+1.6S D+S 6975 SW SANDBURG ST. Project Sheet No. z SUITE 160 Location Job No. TIGARD, OR 97223 Client By ENGINEERING PHONE(971) 371-1958 Date PICS L.aS btrz / 3 r �I� f x i l� �IZH � 3 SSuriC 2. II( f F-Lor /0 K/o /'-( = 2 l ' — 2 A 302 f 7 goo • 122-1 1-73 A 4P . = 2112— L.-J/3 SL- Project: Putzier Residence Underpinning Sheet: .3 f '' Client: Terrafirma Foundation Systems Date: 1/27/2017 Job#: S101-324 Revised: sT<uc'u „. _`c Subject: Helical Pier Sleeve and Pier Design By: RWV CHECK SLEEVE AND PIER FOR ECCENTRIC LOADING Design Approach: Determine eccentricity based on required area for concrete bearing. Resolve eccentricity at sleeve tube, assuming no moment is transferred to pier sections below. Assume sleeves resists flexure from eccentric loading and pier transfers all vertical load to the soil. Loads: Pp 2112 Lb PL 0 Lb ^1 A P i Begging Area, Ps 313 Lb EPA I k i' Are 11IIn i Inputs: =r i f ! a 2.75 in 7f��1 _a.J J JJ = - b 10 in (bracket width) 11=111 -- � ' i be 4.00 ft (Effective ftg. length, passive IL I c I. _I 11, iII R c 12 in 1=1; �-A � � is . I d 30 in ���I� liP I �,` h 42 in 1Lli �. , q1 D 3.5 in �I t'Ir • d.h M 1 fc 2500 psi q2 I .r��► 'h ' q 300 pcf (prescriptive passive — k 30 in pressure w/increase per ( d o : r i Check Concrete Bearing: -Fa - y Pt, 3035 Lb 1.2D+1.6S &h 4 ”""'t " i D Pn 1381 psi ---1 2 q3 Areq 2.20 in � i • f 0.22 in <<seat length,therefore OK Eccentric Moment: e 2.86 in (f/2+a) P 2425 Lb D+S M 578 ft-Lb Project: Putzier Residence Underpinning Sheet: LI Client: Terrafirma Foundation Systems Date: 1/27/2017 `_ ` Job#: S101-324 Revised: `'1''' ""`"' [" Subject: Helical Pier Sleeve and Pier Design By: RWV CHECK SLEEVE AND PIER FOR ECCENTRIC LOADING Loads: P 2425 Lb (see previous calculation) M 578 ft-Lb (see previous calculation) 1.2D+1.6S Sleeve Properties: OD 3.5 in ID 3.068 in t 0.216 in Design t 0.201 in 7%thickness loss for corrosion Design OD 3.470 ksi d P Bearing Area, F 50 ksi ^j r Il � i Areq , S 1.59 in3 '111=11i= I11` f 111. Pier Properties: 1.11.11. �� .1 - OD 2.820 in 11 I: c � `i 5-<.: ;11 t` R ID 2.548 in (— W I` II=,L La ��lk� t 0.136 in 0=1 j ' 0 1=11= V II Design t 0.126 in 7%thickness loss for corrosi i , q ._ M Design OD 2.801 ksi �Il�lr yi =11. h II X11 ; F 50 111=11 1 I i e i r y 0.95 in 11#11= ` - ^:gat c i m I A 1.06 int ` d h Axial Force on Pier. LL a ',In'''.'".1-, V Lu,pier 36 In ,a" # .:` ,e i K 2 KI/r 76 Fa 19.6 ksi (Table 4-22 AISC 13th Ed.) Pa 21 kips Pr/Pc 0.12 51,Therefore O.K. Flexure on Sleeve at Bracket: M 578 ft-lb Ma 3978 ft-Lb M/Ma 0.1 51.0,Therefore O.K. Project: Putzier Residence Underpinning Sheet: r Client: Terrafirma Foundation Systems Date: 1/27/2017 • • Job#: S101-324 Revised: Subject: Pier Bracket Design By: RWV CHECK FOUNDATION BRACKET 1)Check Grade B7 Threaded Rod: m= 3/4 in Fy= 125 ksi n= 10 thread/in At= 0.334 in2 44--•'� 5 TA= 41.8 kip I! 2)Check Weld At Stiffiners: ;, O FEXX= 70 ksi —`l d.. — � IEL.. I Iw= 5 in 5. .. pi ' I I t„,= 3/16 in ` • 1 Vd0= 27.8 kip 2—ic _ A v INi I`�� Pmax= 21.4 kip if XIII 5• ;l 3)Check Weld At Verticle Plate: j g I R=6.5/5*P= 0.77 R O Up FExx= 70 ksi / . 5• lw= 5 in tw= 3/16 in Vn/O= 27.8 kip32"O.D. Pmax= 21.4 kip 4)Check Plate Shear and Bending: 5" p p M= 1.5P V= P t= 0.375 in Fy= 36 ksi / 61" V.= 36.4 kip Ma= 28.4 kip Setting Unity Equation Equal to 1: 1.5P/Ma+(PNa)"2=1 Pmax= 15.5 kips < Controls i2" / }2" 5)Check Cap Plate: Capacity to Demand Check: t= 1 in Capacity,Pmax= 15.5 kip Fy= 36 ksi Demand,P= 2.4 kip (see previous calculation) b= 5 in DCR= 0.16 <1,therefore O.K. M=P/2*1.5" 0.75 P Ma= 27 kip Pmax= 36 kip Project: Putzier Residence Underpinning Sheet: Client: Terrafirma Foundation Systems Date: 1/2i2017 • . Job#: S101-324 Revised: s,e:r_r_x.; - Subject: Helical Pier Capacity Check By: RWV CHECK TORQUE ON SHAFT AND DETERMINE INSTALLATION PRESSURES: Loads: P 2425 Lb (see previous calculation) Torque Correlation Method: Shaft Type HP288 FS 2 Kt g ft'1(Empirical torque correlation factor) T 539 ft-Lb Ta 7900 ft-Lb >T,OK Minimum Gauge Pressure: C 3 int-ft(Gauge pressure to torque conversion factor) p 180 psi(Minimum installation torque pressure) Use 1000 psi minimum installation pressure CHECK HELICAL LEAD CAPACITY: P 2425 Lb Pa 65400 Lb DCR 0.04 <1,OK Helical Pile Capacities Summary Default Maximum Torque it tknato Maximum Allowable Correlation Maximum Targets Correlated Mechanical Shaft C ..acities Faetort41 inatailatton Soil Capacitflart Axial Axial K, Torque Q.=K x T Comp r ssion Tension i - (ft-lbs) (kips) (kips) (kips) OA 50 10 6,500 65.0°1" MA 75 10 10,000 i00_0011 =,.. 9 5.80 50,4 WM MEM HP2tlb P 7,900 - HP94613,000 91.0 se 7,..1 to opt 14P860 15,000 112.0 101,8"•;, 62.501 (1)-c.o.srna4 by A wbwnp°K'e y-r!erste�3,W(1-4A150)at 07,P3'itdA175)C-ace a tat In doable shear. (2)-Governed by bearing al the bob bolas. (3)-CapaC44*IncWde a aclseduled lobs h*etud Rieknesa due in corrosion for flock,uncoated seal. EchedJad thtrwhana teams are fora period of 50 years and are n eroamanee etef tcc-ES AC35e (a)-Alloaatle compresalon reposes aro basad on Continua.*Ista°e1 sot ccrdinemsf r n••sada with SPT blow counts t 4. Plias whir eap44ed tin braced lengths or plea placed in weaker or Riad soils should be evaluated on a case by case haws by the prosect engineer. (b)-Listed mactianKa capaaaa;are lar dva shard ally. 9ysien.C91_esddes should Oleo not exceed the mailed threaa- Comalat d Capacity se no*Pelee In Rate respective bledset capacity tides. (8)-Laded default 1(,factors are widely aoomted inckaVy slandsrds. They ars generally conaor.aliva andarp oxiaisttu well these laced n ICC CS AC396 Sto-speeltic tc,factors owl be datslt[tined tort a l uer rruisti se h tuk-scale 14841 leelhy. (7)-Silt canasta*USW Ora ultimate vali*4 sR huthie,un+hmla lelkm torque Mosel*nor carsesty values are atoned Mr evil:frig the timate v mee by The aparopfate 4SOor of safety(FOSS, FOS Is most commonly taken vis 2 0,ellheer,'i p Mahe.or farce.-rte rney be conrdered r:the ckbek,Om v1 IRs,b41441 one deallnet Of be dh ialed br 1446)Iw dt requimena11 T (9) Sguae steak pies may be coosderan to enmp-ePaan apyicalloms h Sol states trial d'u'sueloient COilSnusr<ie unite sutg7ohf e a.In soils will SPT bail.cows P 10. Earn in these higher siiength sod oondcons bucking analyses shale be ccrsidered,bans into ammi disarMnun es and p❑tamtal apzstnlnetl fi4 created by the coopers A Project: Putzier Residence Underpinning Sheet: �- • Client: Terrafirma Foundation Systems Date: 1/27/2017 ' •' Job#: S101-324 Revised: E'R r u;