The URL can be used to link to this page

6960 SW SANDBURG STREET-4 1! 6960 SW 5-x'2 ek' Construction Ins1wc•tiou iP Rctatcd 7ixts Carmen T'csti.ng, Inc. P.O.Box 23614 REPORT OF 6 x 12 Concrete TEST SPECIMENS ngerd,Oregon 97223 — — Phone(503)684-3450 Date Molded: 6 -1 19. A7 Job No. __f2-1A1"1 Permit No. . Client: — RFII Ptah 1 i cat i 0I.—X_.—.-- _-- —. --- -- _ -- Project; QVf1 Puhl i r,at J()rk;_Artr1 i t i nn. ___ Address: Tinarri llrrannr__, Contractor: ,yX.L-nn_ Sub Contractor. Concrete Supplier: Wi 1 cnrn_i_Uj;_Ln^rrRt-p Truck No. 41______�_ Ticktt No 09646 _ Cast By: ^ (' Si aS�� Test Time: - :_I ' _ Load No. —__.L__—_._ Sunny 85 Weather: —.-- Temp. High: , _� Temp. !aw: . 4•t) Location of riarement: Pr int i ng press base. _ Cu. Yds. 1 °r 14 Concrete Temp: 71 Strength Requirement: __ 40M PSI ®_—�—__ dowsSlump _4•' Cement Type__1_1L__ Mix No./No. Sacks_ fi ,ark - Air Content Max. Aggregate—3/4" Admix. Amount: Brand: Admix. Amount: — Brand: -W ter Reducer, Set Test® Register Date Date Unit Total Area Unit Report _ No. Days Number Recd — Text Wt. Load PSI No. 1 6286 6-4 6 -10 73,781 28.27 2610 1 I 625% 4 J 10 771.802 28.27 4750 1 28 6286 6-4 7 - 1 92,489 28.27 3270 2 35 6286 6-4 7-8 114,370 28.27 4050 3 Remarks: _ cc: City of Tigard Mac oil" aito & Assoc. Jorgens Const. Construction Ins[wc(ion&RrIated Tests Carlson Testing, Inc* P.O.Box 23614 6 x 12 ConcreLeTigard,Oregon 97223 REPORT OF TEST SPECIMENS Phone(503)684-3460 Date Molded: ---Ek--2— 19---Rl— Job No. fermi t No. Client: --- RED P-iih I i ra L i nn-v Project: ____RLJL_IILLUI i vat i nnc Add_iJdnn-v Address: --l-ioaLA, nrpan Contractor: -lorgens-const r-i-I Win ___ Suk)Cuntroctor: Concrete Supplier: W i I qnny i 1121-LLIULLIRt IR Truck No. 41 Ticket No, 09648 Cust By: Test Time: Load No Weather: sunny Temp. High: Temp Low: Location of Pla-.ement: Printing press base. I 71 Cu. Yds. of 14 Concrete Temp: daysSlvmp 4" --Cement Tyr., Strength Requirement: PSI ®._2 Mix No./No. Socks Air Content Max. Aggregate 1/4" Admix. Amount: ---- grand: _-- Admix. Amount: Brand: WaLer ReduceL. Unit t Report D, 'S Set Register Date-76`ale Area Unit Total Test ota' Recd :No. Days Number Rec'd Test Wt. Load 7 -- PS No. 7 6286 6-4 6 -10 73,781 28.27 2.610 1 -1 611% 15-4 6 -10 77,802 29.27 2750 1 --- —----- -- ----r� 28 6286 6-4 7 92,489 28.27 3270 2 56 6286 6-4 '1 --29 28.27 Remarks: cc: City (if Tigard Mac enZ a 81 O SSOc. Jorgens Const. Construcdov lnspem*on lQ RelAted Tcats Carlson Testing, Inc. P.O.Box 23814 REPORT OF 6 x 12 Concrete TEST SPECIMENS Tipard,Oregon 97223 Phone(503)6"-3460 Date Molded: 6 -1 19 H7 Job No. _L2._3aLL.._ Permit Client. _-____-RED-Pub 1 i ra t-i n �_--- --_ ---. — ---- Protect: —__jd_D_P_ubJ i rat i Address: --1 Aar-ii QLepnn _ - ---- — -----��-- Contractor: -:onct-ir-t inn a Sub Conhac,or. Concrete,Supplier: Wi1r,[1I1yLillp. Truck No Ticket No. Cast By: —_--C^�t acrd— Test Time: Load No. Weather: — Sunny _ _ _ Temp. High: ^f1� Temp. Low: . 45 Location of Placement: Printing press base. Cu. Yds. I of 1.4 Concrete Temp: 11 `',ength Requirement: 4000 PSI ® 28 days Slump_ 4" Cement Type Mix No.lNo. Sacks 6LfaLk Air Content _ Max. Aggregate Admix. Amount: _ Brand: _. __—_ Admix. Amount: Brand: AA12L Ke_dUS_4L. Set Test a Register Date Date Unit Total Area Unit Report No. Days Number Recd Test Wt. Load PSI ___No. 1 6286 6-4 6 -10 '13,781 28.27 261.0 1 7 62.86 6-4 6 - l0 77,802 28.27 2750 1 28 6286 6-4 1 - 1 28.27 2.8 6286 6-4 7 - 1 28.27 Remarks: _cc: City of T i gar -- cke eM/�o -Assoc Jorgens Const. CITY OF 6,IGARD PLUMBING 13125 M HaU Blvd. Appiicanb relit hold Oreiion Regimiation to corAxl a plumbing PERMIT X CR 9=1buskwu or rtant bre props"owlev r /operator not hili outside help. JC- Plumbing Permit No. Jt Descriptiori �~ '` Tom' - r" ORS t,14-21-e1U QUAN. PRICE AMT. Job Tar Lot Map.No. Address FIXTURES L1011 Block SubNviswn Sink 7.50 _ '-- i Form xs r lavatory -- 7.54; _ Tub or TutVShowe+Comb. 7.50 — ess Shower Only-- -'— ---- _ 7.60 Owner ,late --- ---- Tip Water Closet --— - — 7.50 -- Dishwasher 7.50 --- -------- Phone --- Garbage Disposal --- ---- - 7.50 -.--- Name — -- Washing Machine - _ 7.50 - Floor Dram 7.50 maigiog ass _ Pfxx�e---- Water Healer _ — 7.50 -- - Laurxiry Room 1 ray A. . . . 7.50 — Occupant CityiState $ — `— — Urinal 7.50 e Other Fixtures(Specify) _- - - 7.50 ' 9 tt, ., 3:01 - --7.50 - r G 7,3367 - -7-S0-- -- Contractor to G aQ 7.50 ex", ��-r�3 MISCELLANEOUS Hua.Ta`xJNo. Sewer tall 100' 30.00 tJ C G7 ' Wiii-g- a s, tc f,;ewer Ia.Addit.100' 1!i_00 - (Rasdenllal) Water SerAce 1 st 100' 20.00 _ I hereby acknowledge that I have reed this application.thal Iha Information Water Service ea.Addil.20' — 15.00 _ g+wn is oort+cl MW 1 am reglafwed with the State RuildW a Board,and also Storm 8 Rah Drain 1 st.100' 30.00 have a Stet PkrmbbV liow that the numbers given are oon*cL(hal all -- - - plurnt r work wig be done in actioniarx»with appilcAule provisions of Che. Storm 6 Prdn Drain Addit.100' gon Revised Statutes Chapters 447 and M and a40kitt"cones and that Mobilo Molle Spam 25.00 no help will be employed unless lkr onsed under OAS%3 (II exempt Irtxn - — - State ragiairshon,Please give reason below) Bads Flow Prevention 7� HOMEOWNERS-I hereby o@rWy that I am the owner rel the property d,• Device or Anti-Pollution Device 7.50 _ f�3 sa>bod above,at which location I roopoeo to maks a pksnbrq inataUtIon kx Any Trap or Waste NM my own use and Mis property Is r.ol being conshucled for 6".base or rem Connected b a Fixture 7.50 Catch Basin 7.50 rep.of Exist.Pkrrttbhg 10.00 Per Fir. - - -- Specialty Requested Impactions --- 40.00 Per Hr. - _ Aller.of Pkrnbkng wilhh y an Ex"%Bldg. 15.00 min. i AIITHOA 0 RF —�—� uh►e 'taw Brig.or Build.Addition 25.00 mh, ai�in�rgle fa dl Describe work now[_] atkiltion( ) atheration f9-- repair❑ dwelling 15.00 VV residential fl nqn-residential F-xis&V use of ..�,. btAk�rt u t»pmpwty 6-TOTAL Prgp Od Ws Of 4%OLWO(AAO! ,111, 110 Ofp10pMt)'------------ NOTICE --- _ TOTAL 7h*ptllrttllf homiea trA area voidill weak or oorxeunron autlwrlxad is nM com- wl/t411B0 datytyar M oart�rtrrAlun or nxtoelt M allsRrsrdad orabandoned kw sa par d of too day+all"Me tdtr work Is oonMwnood 111"C110461.co"arno"1111 D1tAs Msusd "�1�.._._ by --�e -- - MAC.KENZIUSAITO&ASSOCIATES, P.0 C .OREGON —� MACKENZIE/SAITO&ASSOCIATES,P.S.,WASHINGTON 0690 SW BANCROFT STREET PORTLAND,OREGON 97201 (5(13)224.9570 RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION JOB RFD Publications 284021 JOB NO.-- DATE— 5/4/87 -� _—.-- INCOMING CALL._ PERSON Tom Pleischer OUTGOING CAL COMPANY City of Tigard — -- -_ PHONE NO SUBJECT:_._-_ REMARKS Mackenzie/Saito & associates informed Tom that the roof for the new addition at RFD Publications was an Owens-Corning 31NC Class B roof. Gene Mildren _- GM/smk cc: Tom Pleischer - Gene Mildren BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION DATE__�:'r�:� T HE LIN DERSIGNE:D HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PIcRMIT FOR THE WORK HEREIN INDICATED BUILDER PHONE 239-4080 _ OR AS SHOWN AND APPROVED IN THE ACCONIPANYING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. OWNER PHONE LOT NO..�r�, i,.� n.,- yA1- 0960 "m `-ettor9kivm UWNER__�_� ��rnst JQBADDRESS ARCHITECT ?24-4570 ENGINEER BUILDER eTf1i4'p ns Connt. ADDRESS — DESIGNER-- ? � ,nZja!!'„j9tO STRUCTURE _❑ NEW CKREMODEL ❑ ADDITION_ _❑ REPAIR ❑ RENEWAL L1 FIRE DAMAGE CJ DEMOLITION ❑ RESIDENCE lit-GMM ❑ EDUCATIONAL 1-1 GOV'T ❑ RELIGIOUS U PATIO ❑ CARPORT r_] GARAGE ❑ STORAGE ❑ SLAB❑ FENCE OCCUPANCY __LAND USE ZONE _- P BLDG.TYPE --3bL-FIRE ZONE—.-.---PLAN CHECK BY ._--}-U2.HEAT_ Rmt,i . eri.st i.rg n l ctt) rrc�l.ealrx with i:nct�alsa3cl t3l b fOr r.>res� 1 ii + �+ �ter, t, yll per M>pmpad pl"Ins nt3r1_calcul.at:t(m a x9 speGi.fi,,�arxis. L3lda. :.a_.j.UUy an 'r k lr.r,r& SEWER PERMIT# OCC.LOAD FLOOR LOAD _HEIGHT NO.STORIESAREA NO.BEDROOMS VALUE IMP BUILDING DEPARTMENT SET BACKS FRONT REAR 3"' LEFT SIDE '' RIGHT SIDE Permit 11-0•50 THIS PERMIT IS IS:II�D S�T TO THE REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN THE BUILDING CODE, ZONING 71�� " 'AFOULATIONS AND A L Mt- MILE CODE",, AN n- ORDINANCES, AND IT IS HEAE!lY AORFEDTHAt THE Plan Check WORK WILL 3E DONE '.N ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES THE ISSUANCE OF 'PHIS PERMIT DOES NOT WAIVE Sub total RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS. CONTRACTOR AND SUB CONTRACTORS TO HAVE CURRENT CITY BUSINESS LICENSE.SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRES FOR SEWER.PLUMBING AND HEATING. State lax 4.42 --- SDC— TotalhUCM APPLICANT OR AGENT — -� --- By - Receipt No 1 Approved �, AbU'R-� ---�--^- ^— PHONE DATE INP.1 TYP!JN�SPECTION F 'LIM A R PLUMBING— DATE — n actor 9q-0-7 mit No. S z (0 Rough in Fixture Final HEATING Contractor Permit No. Gas or Oil Rough-in Final SEWER Final DRIVEWAY Finel Storm Drainage (pairi Drain)Final Sk Curb&Street Final Approach ELM DEPT.FINAL TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OCCUPANCY Final CERTIFICATE OCCUPANCY Landscaping Zoning Final .c71F �yZ Co7o� CITY OF TIGARD 639.4171 DATE �. iP-77 BUILDING PERMIT 1 7 TAX MAP :=' 1'LL N0. a —SUBDIVISION _____ OWNER_ _, 7b L�BADDRESS BUILDER " __ UGV�//�/STATE REG.NO. -_ _ 'EXP.DATE BUILDER'S PH N ARCHITECT _ r �'IxMIONE {' _OTHER _ STRUCTURE C) NEW _ REMdbEL ❑ ADDITION ❑ REPAIR 11 MOVE U OTHER n DEMOLITION I_I RESIDENCE C I COMM 11 EDUCATION ❑ IND i I RELIGIOUS 1 1 ACCESSORY (I GARAGE O OTHER I I FENCE OCCUPANCY . _LAND USE ZONE •1 r" �(BLDG.TYPE .. —_.FIRE Z.ONE__PLAN CHECK BY (/1(J--,HEAT TWO T �_. :/ SEWER PERMIT N _ — _ ' OCC.LOAD FLOOR LOAD _HEIGHT NO.ST IES 4REA NO.BE ROOMS VALMJE�''. BUILDING DEPARTMENT SET BACKS FRONT FAR E RIGHT SIDE - Permit _ ��t7, S(;r _ THIS PERMIT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN THE BUILDING CODE, ZONING REGULATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES,AND IT IS HEREBY AGREED THAT THE Plan Check _ / , �,� WORK WILL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES ANfi RRVINAIGCES. THE ISSUANCE OF *HIS PEWAIT DOES NOT WAIVE PI.Ck_.Fire RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS. CONTRAL10t1 AND SUB CONTRACTORS TO HAVE CURRENT CITY BUSINESS TAX PERMITS.SEPARATE PERMITS C144R€0 FOR SEWER, LUMBING AND HEATING. State Tax L �� 1 SDC-- Total o4/' - ----- -- _ APPLICANT OQ i � �•Prep . Receipt N A DRESS PHONE Bal.D ----- Issue _-- -----Approved By------ -_-- r,4 ✓� f a I ao y I 00 a „r ON,00 , LM to V a 0ul � tic b A � u 0 cNo w C V 0+ t-� cm � -i3rrhz �q/ @...,mu:..x6.:.....,r.•:�s6t�aL�n'�td�tia.>::::s� -,, _��r";.�:�: -c - p�.a. �,�\A INSPECTION NOTICE City of Tigard Building Department P.O. Box 23397 T!gard, Oregon 97223 Phone: 6:39-4175 Type of Inspection -- -- — Date Requested _ `✓ 9— o Time A.M. _P.W. Address `-SCJ �'�� __ Permit #_ Owner Lot #BuilderThe following Building Code deficiencies are required to be corrected: - / IfE - = Presented to Approved Inspector ❑ Disapproved Date CALL FOR REINSPECTION O YEs ❑ NO MAC:KENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.C., OREGON MACKENZ_IE/SAITO&ASSOCIATES, P.S.,WASHINGTON AHCHITECT:;-PLANNERS 0690 SW BANCROFT STREET PORTLAND, OREGON 97201 (503) 224 9570 March 3, 1987 City of Tigard Attention: Tom Plescher P. 0. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: RFD Publications Project No. 284021 Dear Torn: In accordance with your request during the meeting held in your offir.e on January 23, 1987, we are forwarding the following information to your office for your perusal : 1. A copy of the current topography survey completer; by Jim Weddle along with a section showing a comparison between the grades prior to construction and grades after construction. This comparison indicates that no appreciable fill was placed on the adjoinirg property. 2. A detail indicating the section of the wood retaining wall which improves the bank' s stability in the vicinity of the south edge of the .ew pavement area. Bill Jorgens of Jorgens Construction Company informed our office that this detail would be completed on the project by Tuesday, March 3, 1987. 3. A Record of Telephone Conversation between Ken Robbins of Dames & Moore and Tom Mackenzie which indicates that Ken had reviewed the sketch and determined that the sections for the retaining wall are adequate. It is our understanding that with these memos and details the City of Tigard' s request for information is satisfied in order for the Certificate of Occupancy to be granted. Please inform our office if we can be of further assistance with the scheduling so that we can provide the owner with the Certificate. Sincerely �qne Mildren ( /jcr cc: Bill Jorgens - Jorgens Construction Company Ben Staton - PFD Publications MACKENZIE/SAITO&ASSOCIAi ES,P C ,OREGON J�Lr MACKENZIEJSAITO a ASSOCIATES,P S.,WASHINGTON -J d 06% SW 6ANv;'ROTI STREET POR?LAND OREGON 97201 (503)224-9570 RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION Publications JOBB RFD 284021 ---- -- - JOB NO DATE— 2/27/87 10:00 a.m. - —_-----.�-- TIME ----__—.__-� INCOMING PERSON_ Ken Robbins X OUTGOING CAI-L _ COMPANY Dames 6 Moore PHONE NO.� _ SUR.IECI South Bank Stability REMARKSKen Robbins has received and reviewed the sketch showing the treated wood support for gravel at the edge of the pavement and considers it adequate. Thomas R. Mackenzie GM/smk cc: JGene Mi ldren Ken Robbins Jorgens Construction File —T—30-"�"1H8 0996-W(COS)LOW N0cJ3HO'ONYIlbOd 1 A ad IS fA0H )NVq S 0890 y -- 1-- �e Q� 'ONeor-31vo ` U31VH0dtf03Nl JNId33NION3 aIZN3H3VW 7_ c �z A9 ?�7 ,I';f, Y $� o u °�,`� `, `��,��,1• air, 4'km Me \ X I � v X V+-� % 00 cb J A MACKENZIE/SAITO &ASSOCIATES, P.C. --U Jb4i�. �_E` PUN'.AN5,UACGUN 97201 1503)224 uj7U _J LJ M ENAORAN DUM DATE: January 23, 1987 SUBJECT: RFD Publications Addition 6960 S.W. Sandburg Road, Tigard Project Number 284021 BY: Thomas R. Mackenzie TO: File rhe following is to summarize the matters discussed regarding subject project at Tigard City Hall , 9: 10 to 10:00 a.m. on January 23, 1987. Present were: William A. Monahan, Director - Community Development Department, Brad C. Roast, Building Official - Community j evelopment Department, Ed Walden, Assistant Building Official , Tom Plescher, Building inspector, and the undersigned. i 1. Mackenzie/Saito & Associates will establish that there is no appreciable fill I from this current permit word: on the adjacent property to the south. We will do this by comparing survey data accomplished prior to the start of construction 1 with another survey that will be accomplished earl_✓ in the week of January 25, 1987 . In the process of accomplishing this limited topographic work , we will also locate the two south corners of the new addition. 2. Mackenzie/Saito & Associates will provide a line item estimate of the costs to modify and improve the bank stability in the vicinity of the south edge of new pavement. The modification will be designed to r ire adequate performance for the south extremities of the pavement and cu, placed under this current construction work . 3. Contractor or owner will provide the City with a Performance Bor.d covering 100% of the cost of work outlined in item 2 above. This Performance Bond will assure that the corrective work is accomplished by June 30, 1987 . 4. The City will issue a temporary Certificate of Occupancy for work accomplished under the current construction contract. Final Certificate of Occupancy will be issued when improved bank stability describe' in item 2 above is completed. 5. Temporary Certificate of Occupancy can be issued on January 30, 1987 if elements described in items 1 through 3 above are completed and delivered to thin City no later the morning of Jaruary 29, 1987 . fihotnas R. Mackenzie, P.E. TRM/jcr cc : William A. 'Monahan, Brad C. Roast - City of Tigard Ed Walden, Torn Plescher -- City of Tigard Jorgens Co,istruction Company RFD Publications Greg Hran.3c . .................... ............... ........ JORGENS CONSTRUCT1081 CO. 8145 S.E. SIXTH AVE - POHTLAND,C -,ON 97202 (503) 239.4nBO TELEPHONE !NCOMING OUTGOING RECORD v ' CONVERSATION MEETING Jot) RFD Publications Job No. 8 6 0 08 Date 1/5/871"ime 4 : 20 p m Person(s) Ed Walden Company i f Tigard_ - 639-4171 Phone No. SI.Ibject_...__Certificate of occupancy Reference : MSA ' s phoncon of 12/9/86 with city of Tigard . Remarks 1 . Granular fill has been compacted in the undermined areas of pavement atthesouth property line . 2 . Prior to leaving the site , we removed rock/bolders which fell down the bank durir.g construction . What remains was inplace prior to commencement of construction . 3 . The city of Tigard requires documentation from the architect ensuring stability of the new add i ti on should the bank be excavated back to property line . Bill Jorgens cc : Tom Mackenzie - Mackenzie/Saito & Associates Greg Hranac Mackenzie/Saito & Associates ----.Ed Walden City of Tigard (�ri MACKENZIE!aAITO&ASSO' J, P C.. OREGON I I MACKENZIE/SAITO&ASSOC,AI ES P S WASHINGTON RECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION JOB_ RFD Publications 284021 JOIE NO..�_ DATE 12/9/86 __----___.- - 1�i,!F_ A. __...—___..._ INCOMING CALL X PERSON Ed Walden OUTGOING CALL_-_ COMPANY_City of Tigard PHONE NO SUBJECT: Certificate of Occupancy _77- REMARr Certificate t)f Occinancy cannot be issued untie 'wo elements are cleared: 1. The removal of debris (primarily boulder-0 t! at hav,a t al len onto adjacent property as a result of the contractor's work. 2. A possibl,-� erosion and loss of support ojac nt t,, -he aav ment between the new building and the adjacent property li,ie. We will speak tc Jorgens Coistruction, as will the City of ligard, regarding removal of the debris. A representative from our geotechnical consultants, Dames and Moore, and a representative {-^om our office will review the erosion, sil:uation. Thomas R. 11ackenzie, P.E. TRM/smk cc: Greg Hranac Bill Jorgens Dames and Moore vtd Walden MACKENZIE/ ITO & ASSOCIATES, P.C., OREGO MACKEM?IE/SAITO&ASSOCIATES, P.S.,WASHINGTON AHCHITLc rs-PLANNERS 0690 SW BANCROFT STREET PORTLAND, OREGON 97201 (503) 224-9570 November 13, 1986 City of Tigard Attention: Ec Walden 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. P. 0. Dix 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Ed: Re: RFD Publications Project No. 284021 At your request, we have specifical iy reviewed the theo� deal stability of the recent addition to subjel-t building, usin( the presumption that the adjacent property owner excavated down to a line where the soil surface is believed to have existed 15 to 20 years ago. Information from our files shows that the most critical footing has an edge located approximately 18 feet from RFD Publications' south property line. The bottom of this same footing is approximately 111. 4" above ground surface that is believed to have existed at the property line in the period 1960 to 1970. In our opinion excavation on the adjacent property near- this critical footing to a depth approximating that the original ground surface would not present a hazard to the RFD structural addition. Should the adjacent property owner choose to excavate to depth approximating the grade which is believed to have existed prior to 1970, we would recommend that RFD request the adjacent owner provide retainage to the land on RFD' s property at no expense to RFD. Our limited research indicates that there probably exists a duty for the adjacent property owner to maintain RFD' s property as it exists today. In our telephone conversation on November 12, 1986. you indicated additional concern that debris from the recent construction had not been cleared from adjacent property. It is our understandinq that this matter has now been resolved, and the contractor, Jorgens Construction Company, has the responsibility of assuring your concurrence. Since the debris has now been cleared, and our statements above alleviate concern for the structural integrity of the addition, we request that the appropriate Certificate of Occupancy be issued. Ed Walden, City of Tigard Project Number: 284021 November 13, 1986 Page Number 2 Many thanks For your attention to this matter. It is always a pleasure to work with you. Sincerely, PRDfF�,� IN�` G � 4045 OREGON y0+ r 7th qS ALP MpG� Thomas R. Mackenzie, P.E. TRM/,jcr cc: Jorgens Construction Company Ben Staton, RFD Publications I ,4 INSPECTION NOTICE City of Tigard Building Department P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 (� Phone: 639-4175 Type of Inspection _-�- _ _--------- —- -- Date Requested -I C.` .-$� Titsr_ A.M. P.M. Address AAS.----- Owner l� 1--\ -------- _. Lot # Buildnr The following, Building Code deficiencies are required to be d: I Presstamed p!� � --- F) Approvot Inspector [jh/proved Date — CALI. FOR REINSPECTION YES 17 NO INSPECTION NOTICE City of Tigard Building Department P.O Box 23397 I igard. Oregon 97223 Phone: 639-4175 Type of Inspection Date Requested Address —p-�, Permit Owner—Q..L_l�_ �}1w�� o. _— Lot # Builder The following Building Code deficiencies are required to be corrected: i r Presente t Zroved InspectorDisa pproved Date - CALL FOR RE1NSPECTI0/V ❑ YES D No h INSPECTION NOTICE T City of Tigard Building Department r 3 2 P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone 639-41755 Type of Inspection . Date Requested-- 9/4VTime_ A.M.__._.�_P.M. Address -_6961 J 54Hd Ry 2 e- Permit Owner - ��------- -- __ _ Lot — Builder.-- ---- ---- ------ The fo0owing Building Code deficiencies am required to be corrected: Presented to _ / __ .. --_ -- _-_ _ p"�ll proved Inspector _ I Disapproved Date - -- -- ` - . CALL R REINSPECTION ❑ YES ❑ NO NSPECTION NOTICE ;ity of Tigard Building Department P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone: 639-4175 'Type of Inspection Date Requested - - _- _ --- �c, � Time P.M. Permit #_��t� Address -S�L� CD „�� ~ Owner iS Builder Lot # — The following Building Cade deficiencies are required to be corrected:---- -f Presented to Inspector P --- -----___ - pproved _ Date ff U Disapproved CALL POR R i NSPEMON ❑ 'SES ❑ NO I t CtTy UP 'AkU MECHANICAL. I'LlIMIT - -- CLLy of Tigard F'c rmi[ 0 /l 13125 SW IFall Blvd. P-0. Box 23397 aeO`*1dOn Table iA Mechanical Code QTY ERIC[ AM'r Tigard OR 97223 619-4175 1) Permit Fee ::�:F3.00 10.00 2) Supplemental Permit 1) Furnace to 100.000 BTU incl. ducts & vents 6.Q0 2) Furnace 100,000 6TU +o;uj N of oeyeloP�ll�n _ Incl. ducts& vents �i` 7.50 J�,d Ar><sr+` fj 3) Floor Furnace' - / Job V incl. vent _ 6.00 Address rax Lot Map No. 7 4) Suspended heater, wall heater Lu Block subdivision or floor mounted heater__ 6.00 _ Name ( or name o1 Ina,a 5) Vent,n jt iiiLi. In—� P'r Pl�'C� G�� ,rye _ appliance permit 3.00 .Iling Address Phone 6) Repair of heating, refrig., Owner M _ coaling, absorption unit G.00 CItyfst■te ao 7) Boiler or comp to 3HP absorp. unit to 100,000 BTU _ 6.00 _ Name _ 8) Boiler or comp to 3HP-15HP _� t!1! absorp. unit to 500,000 BTU _ 11.00 Melling Address 9) Boiler or comp 15-30 HP absorp. unit iVz-1 million 15.00 Contractor absorp.10) Boiler or comp 30-50 HP - _ absorp. unit 1-1.75 million 22.50 _ Stale Replat(atlon No. City Bus. Tax No. 11) Boiler or comp 50 HP _ absorp. unit 1,750,000 BTU 31.50 I hereby acknowledge that I haw read this application that the Information 12) Air handling unit to Elven Is correct, lf►at owner or am the oor authorized agent of the owner, that Plans ,utmltted we in conpilance with state laws, that I am registered with IO,Odb CFM 4.50 the State Bullders' Board, that the number given Is correct. (if exempt 13 from State registration Please give reason bsiowl• ) Air handling unit 10,000 CFM_+ _- _ 7.50 14) Non portable evaporate cooler 4 i0 15) Vent fan connected -- _ to a single duct_ _ _100 16) Ventilation system not Signature (owner or agent) Date _ included in appliance permit 4.50--- - 17) Hood served by Describe work (j addition[] alteration[) repair[j mechanical exhaust 4.50 to be done residential C] non-residentialJ� - ---- —— 18) Domestic type Exisling use of incinerator _ _ 7.50 _ building or property___ -- 19) Commercial or industrial Proposed use of type incinerator 30.00 bulldln(, or property_ - 20) Other I.e.,woodstove, water -�- 11!a of fuel of I Elnatural gas W t.PG❑ electric El heater, solar, clothes dryers, etc 4.50 —_ NOTICE 21) Gas piping one to four outlets 2 2.00 THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL—AND VOID IF WORK OR 22) More than 4-per outlet CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN -- i — SUB-TOTAL oc 180 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED -� OR AB — �% SURCHARGE FOR A PERIOD OF ,80 DAYS AT `.NY _ / TIME AFTER WORK IS C0f�1ME CFD. PLAN REVIEW 2SXOF 8UB-TOTAL _ .Z-S_ Special Ci ndlllOnS ��_�� ----- --- --- - ---- TOTAL .-1 __ - - .--•• --------._ Halt? issued - t� by J- INSPECTION NOTICE City of Tigard Building Department P.O Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97221 �/ �r / Phone: 639-4175 Type of Inspection -- Date Requested/ �—_ _ Time '�A.M. P•Pd• Permiit #— _ Owner—__ _�...._. C 1 c eUULot 0 Builder ---_-- The following Building Code deficiencies are required to be corrected: — — - -- -- r.. - --- ---- -- ----- --- 10 of -- Presented to Inspector Dissivroved Date CALL POR REINSPECTION L�7 YtS 0 NO IN_ 'ECTION NOTICE City of Tigard Building Department P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone: 639-4175 Type of Inspection __—_ Date Requested--- / r 3 Time— A.M. P.M. Address.---- �' `� 1:1–+�. ss� Permit Owner Lot # Builder The following following Building Code deficiencies are required to be corrected: Presented to Inspector _ �_ _ �/ r� �( u Disapproved Date Ll _ -- CALL FOR REINSPECTION ❑ Y E 8 ❑ NO INSPECTION NOTICE City of Tigard Building Department 3 P O. Box 23397 f Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone 639-4175 Type of Inspection _�F/NIrZ '��C�tj �r` �yr/ Date requested-__ !� Time- Address Permit Owner Lot 3k Fluilder —_—---------- The following Building Code deficiencies are required to he corrected! — Presented to .'" � � — _ - - `"Approved Inspector Disapproved Date .._---- CALL FOR REINMI TIM ❑ YES ❑ NO INSPECTION NOTICE City of Tigard Building Department P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone: 639-4175 Type of Inspection _�f �.1/CUIQeer / l Date Requested TimeA.M.---P.M. Address L_ � S��✓ BUQ Permit # Owner _ /� '�- _ -. _-- Lot — Builder --- The following Building Code deficiencies are required to be corrected: ---- ------- -- —--— it i I Presented to V.-+approved Inspector Disapproved Date CALL FOR REINSPECTION I❑ YES 0 No mff r row Construction Inspection&Related 71-sts Carlson Testing, Inc. 6 x 1.2 CCw—RETE P.O.Box 23814 REPORT OF TEST SPECIMENS Tigard,Oregon 97223 ---- -- Phone(503)884.3460 Ll -28 86 CP-2711 Permit No. Date Molded: ' 19 Jab No. — Mackenzie Saito & Assoc. Client: . — RFD Publications Project: Sandburgh Center Address:--- — Jorgen Corst. Contractor: _ Sub Contractor: —_ — western Pacific 339 8184 Concrete Supplier � Truck No. -- Ticket No. Cast By: �- W. Scheribel Test Time: _ — load No. -^ 1 --Sunny - - 76 61' --- V, ter: — --- — -. _ —_ Tamp. Nigh — Low. -- 0LUr Lc.r slab drop pit and ramp. Location of Plucenient: 19 _—Cu. Yds. —-- Concrete Temp: _.r.;. n Strength Requirement: 3000 PSI 's—.28 days Slump 4 —_Cement Type 1 Mix Na./No. Sacks Mix #726 _ Air Content- — _ Max. Aggregate_ 3/411 Admix. Amount: — Brand:—_____ Admix. Amount: __ Brand: —..— Set Dato l'�it --Total —�- L.r. Report _No. Days Number Recd Test _ Wt. load Af°" PSI No. I 7 3353 E-29 9 - 4 28.27 79,343 2810 32 28 — ?3�3 8-29 4 -25 28.27 11.3,101_ 4000 35 28 vi 3353 8-29 9 —25 — 28.27 - 111,731 3950 35 cc: City of Tigard Remarks: Tnr _ --------- --. _ --- ----_ _ _. - INSPECTION NOTICE City of Tigard Building Department P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone: 639-4175 Type of Inspection of ------ - Date Requested oc Time P.M. Address Permit -—-------- 0e— Owner Lot Builder The following Building %'ode deflclencies are re4wred to be corrected: /F Presented to Inspector ___ '�' —_ Disapproved Date CALL FOR REINSPECTION 1-1 YF3 1:1 NO Constniedon Ingwction&Related Testa Carlson Testing, Inc. 6 x 12 CONCRETE P.O.Box 23811 REPORT OF TEST SPECIMENS ngero,Oregon 47223 Phone(503)"4-3180 8 --27 86 CP-2711 Permit No. Date Molded: __ 19- _ Job No. Client: -- — Mackenzie Saito & Assoc. - al) Publication Project: Sandburgh Center Address: Jorgen Const. Contractor: —_ _ Sub Contractor. Western Pacific 357 7970-17 Concrete Supplier: _ _ Truck No.— Ticket No. -- H. Payson l Cast 8y: Test Time: — — load No. — Sunny - — 85 — - 60 Weather: .- -- _ _ -- --- - _----- ---- - Temp. Hibh: -- ._ Temp. l.,,w: ..- - -_ — Ramp & stair footings, loading dock lower litt slab, dutttpst.er pad. Location of Placement: 8 at test -. --Cu. Yds. -_ Concrete Temp: . Strang►} } frrsb 4000 y— PSI ® 28 days Slump 3 3/4" Cement Type_1 Mix No./No. Sacks Mix #733 — Air Content Max. Aggregate_ 3/4 01 Admix. Amount: — Brand: _ —_ Admix. Amount: _ — Brand: _ — Ce Testa kegister Date [late 1� 066 Total U.:1r—�P�par+ No. Uoys _Number_ Recd Test Wt. _Load Ar-m PSI No, 1 7 - 3340 8-28 9 - 3 115,210 28.27 4080 31 28 3340 _ 8-28 9 -24 150,425 28.27 5320 34 28 3340 8-28 9 -24 152,560 28.27 5400 34 — cc: City of Tigard Remarks: __---�39i`�Pf1_Ef3f'!•�. ——_-- ------ ---- ----------- , pw ar esw w +sstr Consrroctirrn Inspection lQ/Cr/arcd 7i•srs Carlson Testing, Inc. 6 x 12 CONCRETE P.O.Box 23814 REPORT OF — TEST SPECIMENS Tigard,Oregon 97223 Phone(503)684-3460 Dote Molded 8 -27 19 86 - Job No. 2711 Permit No. Mackenzie Saito & Assoc. — Client: h'.FD Publications -_-- Project: Sandburgh Center ---- -- - ------- ~-- -----_ -- Address: ,7orgen Const. Contractor: _ Sub Contractor: 357 Concrete Supplier: Western Pacific - 7970-17 Truck No. ___— Ticket No. Cast By: H• Paysar, l --- -- Test Time: — — L000 No. — Sunny - 85 -- -- 6U == Weather. _ Temp. High: — Temp. Low- Location of Placement: _ [tamp & stair footings, loading dock lower lift slate, dumpster pad. 8 at tFst --_-- --- _- _ Cu. Yds. --Concrete Temp: 4000 - Strengtl�,ee�►Byfrt k� - PSI ® 28--days5lump 3 3/4 --Cement Type I _ Mix No./No.� �Socks lJ Mix #733 Air Content 3/4" —. Max.Max. Aggrega e — — Admix. Amount: _ Brand: .. _ _ Admix. Amount: Brand: Set Test Register Date Date Unit Total Unit Report No.- Days Number Recd _ Test Wt. Load Arca PSI No. I—_ 7 3340 8-28 g�3 �_- 115,2.10 28.'.7 4080 31 --- -28 3340 8-28 9 -24 28. ?7 28 3340 8-28 9 -24 28.::'.1 ----- -- ----------- ------ cc: City of Tiqard Remarks: 4e em-A, - _ -— - --- -- -- - — - INSPECTION NOTICE City of Tigard Building Department P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 1 Phone: 639-4175 Type of Inspection Date Requested _ Time/ A.M..----P.M. Address( Permit Owner_ ------ --- Lot #------------- Builder The following BuildinM :ode deficiencies are required to be corrected: -- r Presented to �• - -_ �- 11 ApFrnved Inspector �� = -- _-- s' Date Disapprove _—��_-=t�� ------ --- CALL FOR PEIN,SPF,CTION 0 YES Fj Nz1 INSPECTION NOTICE City of Tigard Building Department P O Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone 639-4175 Type of Inspection '�-�-"`'r"' 41X Date Requested -_&- Z J� Time 4e!f�, A.M. P.M. Address Permit f^ Owner Lot # Builder The follov,ing Building Code deficienoles ire required to be corrected: i Presented to _ ___-- _ _. pproved Inspector __-. i __--_-_-- isapproved Date — ALL FOR REINSPECTION ❑ VES 01 No �e► IS w w INSPECTION NOTICE City of Tigard Building Department P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone:639-4175 Type of Inspection DALP Requested _- 2 6 A.M. P.M. Aderess 1� I.6—SA—q" 0-i�lz'q Permit Owner --_,E ._. _ ) Lot # ^-- Builder -- —� _-- _----The following Build'ng Code deficienr,ei are required to be rurrect'3d: i 40 Presented to c Inspector _ ''^^ j _ I Disapproved Dale �'GJ CALL FOR REINSPECTION, ❑ YES F1 NO G►nstnictiion Inspection&Related 7cs►s Carlson Testing, Inc. P.O.Box 23814 6 X 12 CONCRE'T'E Tigard,Oregon 97223 REPORT OF TEST SPECIMENS Phone(503)684.3460 Date Molded: 8 -19 , 19 86 Job No. CT-2711 Permit No. CG.nt: Mackenzie Saito & Assoc:. Project- _ RFD P jbjL1 Address: _,Sand ul:gtl Cen ,-r --- Contractor. .Tnrgem C'nnst _ _ Sub Contrwc or: _— Concrete Supp'ier: Weatern pa4;•ifi� --- Truck No.37J& _ Ticket No. 639a— Cost By: - S Jorc3apTes' Time: Weather: ;unny _— Temp. High: 5 lamFp. Low: 5 Location of Placement: 4 loading dock inclouser slabs and perimeter Mab on east end of addition — � _- — --_ Cu. Yds. Concrete Temp: 59 Strength Requirement: --- 4000 PSI ®_ 29-Y_-daysSlurnp 3 1.12'° Cement Type Mix No./No. Socks X742 _ Air Content —i_— Max. Aggregate Admix. Anount: Brand: Admix. Amount: Brand: Set Iest(it Kegisver I__ Date Dat( T�Unit � Total � ')mt—1 Ret.ur— No. Days Number Recd Test Wt. Load AfeO PSI No. I 7 3220 8-40 8 -26 96,800 28.27 3420 30 28 3220 8-20 9 -16 1;)0,550 28.27 4620 33_ 28 3220 8-20 9 -16 —' 12.8,976 28.27 4560 it Remarks: cc: City of Tigard orgen Con—sem--- 01 Construction Inspection&Related Testa Carlson Testing, Inc. 6 x " 2 CONCRETE P.O.Box 23914 REPORT OF TEST SPECIMENS Tigard,Oregon 97223 --'� Phone(503)884-3480 Date Molded: 8 -19 -, 19 86 Job No. . CP-2711 — Permit No. Client: —Mackenzie Saito & Assoc, Project: RFD Th11Ca�iOnS _ I Address: —fin h sr rh Ct-nter Contractor: - Jorgen Ciningt _ -- Sub Contractor: Concrete Supplier: _ WeStnrn D i fiC _ Truck No.37h_-____— Ticket No. _ 6100 �.. Cast By: — c ,?r,Y ., _ _ Test Time: 7T�_ Load No. _� 1 Weather: Sunny 85 55 Temp. High: p _ Temp. low: —..______� Location of Placement: 4 loading dock inel.ouser slabs and perimetE!r slab on east end of addition Cu. Yds. Concrete Tem 59 Strength Requirement: _ �1QjL PSI a –_.28..---days Slump { 112" .—_Cement Type Mix No./No. Sucks Mix #742 -- Air Content _ Max. Aggregate " Admix. Amount: Brand: _ _ Admix. Amount: Brand: Set Test a Register Date Date Unit Total Area Unit Report No. Days Number Recd Test Wt. load PSI No. I 7 32420 I 8-1.0 8 96,800 28.27 3420 30 28 3220 8-20 9 -1-6 28.27 28 3220 8-20 9 -16 28.27 Remarks: cc: City of 'Tigard orgen Const.- — —_.— . .....y..... � MACKENZIE/S;:, J & ASSOCIATES, P.C., OREGON MACKENZIE/SAITO&ASSOCIATES, P.S.,WASHINGTON AHCHIIECTS PLANNERS 0690 S.W BANCROFT STREET PORTLAND, OREGON 97201 '503) 224-9570 August 7, 1986 City of Tigard Attention: Tom Plescher P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Tom: RE: RFD Publications Project Number 281021 this letter is in response to our recent phone conversation on ,august 4, 1986 regarding your letter dated July ?1, 1986. According to our discussion and the permit documents, the slope between the property line and the south face of the structure is acceptable. The Contractor, of rec,ird is also being instructed to remove bo0ders which have rolled onto the adjoining south property. However, what appears to be of concern is the fill that was apparently placed on the adjoining property to the south during construction of the existing building in 1973. Our understanding is that she City of Tigard is requesting a form of approval from the adjacent property owner for this fill . Our office is pursuing resolution of this issue with RFD Publications . Should you have any further quest'lons, or if this dorurntnt is contrary to your understanding, please advise our office within one week of receipt of this letter. Thank you again for your assistance and response. Sincerel , ,en Mildren GM/ ja cc: Greg Hranac Ben Staton Bill Jorgens INSPECTION NOTICE City of Tigard Building Department P.d, Box // 30 Tigard, Oregon nn 97 97223 Phone 639-4175 Typv of Inspection Date Requested 1►._?'�--��- Time Lew-v-- _P.M. Address ' 4 iu'_,!� _ , � _ Permit10- Ownr.r ---- Lot #—_ Builder ___----� _ _-__ The following Building Code deficiencies are required to be corrected: ---- Presented to #± -Approved Inspector __—__-__,___ Disapproved Date -- CALL FOR REINSPECTION Cl YES L7 NO Construcdon►neptrtion&Re/atcd Test,, Carlson 'Vesting, Inc. 6 X 12 Com' P.O.Box 23814 REPORT OF TEST SPECIMENS 7lgerd,Oregon 97223 — Phone(503)6U-3480 Date Molded: 7 -28 _, 19 86 Job No. .(-x"2711 � Permit No. Client: Mackenzie Saito & Assoc. Proiecr: _ RFD Publications Address: Sandburqh Center Contractor: Jorgen Const. _ _ Sub Contractor. Cont-rete Supplier: West-ern Pacif jg _ !_ Truck No. 3.,2t.L Ticket No. --24-0 _L,1 7 Cost By: H. Test Time: load No. Weather: fair -�- Temp. High; 75 Temp. low: 50 Tilt ups panel #12.. Location of Placement; 9 --Cu. Yds. ----Concrete Temp: Strength Requirement: __ 5000 ___- PSI C 28 —days Slump 3° _ _ Cement Type l _ Mix No./No. Sacks _ MiX #766 Air Content_ Max. Aggregate —3 4 Admix. Amounh _ Brand: �A.E•A• Admix. Amount:_ Brand: Set Y Test a Register Date Date -rT Unit Total Area Unit Report No. Days Number Recd Test Wt. Load PSI No. T 3 2970 7-29 7 -31 97,947 28.27 .3460 19 7 2.970 7-29 8 - 4 122,370 28.27 4330 22 28 2970 7-29 8 -25 153,000 78'27 5590 29 28 2970 7-29 8 -25 157,246 28.27 5560 29 Hold 2790 7-29 28.27 8 --25 154.740 _ 5470 29__ Remarks: cc: City of Tigard orgen Const. _ - -- - - - ('onstnurion In pectiun&Related Trsts Carlson Tcstiing, Inc. 6 x 12 CONCROI'E P.O.Bar 23814 REPORT OF TEST SPECIMENS 11gerd,Oregon 97223 --— Phone(503)694-3460 Date Molded: 7-28 _, 19 86 _ Job No. CP-2711. Permit No. Client; Mackenzie Salto & Assoc. Project: . RFD Publications Address: SandSur.gh Center. ---�,--- - ��- Contractor: Jorgen Const. __— Sub Contractor. Concrete Supplier: Western P4Qif _, Truck No. ,} Ticket No. __. 2408zl7_ Cost By: ___HAL_ Payson — Test Time: _ load No. Weather. Pair 50 Temp. High: 7� - Temp. Low; Location of Placement: —Tilt up panel #12. 9 Cu. Yds. ___ Concrete Temp: Strength Requirement; 5000 PSI a 28 days Slump 3° Cement Type I Mix No./No. Sacks_ Mix #766 Air Content Max. Aggregate i-_SZ4"_ Admix. Amount: _ Brand: 1 t.E. . _ Admix. Amount: _ Brand: _ Set Test a Relater Date Dwe Unit Total ArUnit Report No. Days Number Recd Tea est Wt, Load PSI No. 1 3 2970 7-29 7 -31 97,947 28.27 3460 19 7 2970 7-29 b - 4 122,370 28.27 430 22 28 2970 7-29 8 -25 28.27 28 2970 7-29 8 -25 28.27 Hold 2790 7-29 28.2/ Remarks: cc: City of Tigard Jorgen ons . Conitrurtlon Inspecdon&Related Trsrx Carlson Tesfinng, Inc. 6 x 12 P.O.Box 23614 C EI'!U Nord,Oregon 97223 REPORT OF TEST SPECIMENS Phone(503)6W4-3160 Date Molded: 7 -28 19_ 86 Job No. CP-2711 _ Permit No. Client: Macke.az ie Saito & Assoc. ---r-- ------ ---- Project: RM Publications --------- Address: .. Sandburgh Center Contractor: Jurgen Const. - Sub Contractor: Concrete Supplier: WE'3PACific —__ Truck No. 357 Ticket No. 2408-17 Cast By: _ H. PaysQL _ Test Time: Load No. Weather: Fair Temp. High: 75 _ Temp. Low: _ 50 Location of Placement: Tilt up panel #12. a J -----.--Cu. Yds. --_ Concrete Temp: —_ Strength Requirement: __-.5000 PSI (2__28 doy%S!ump 3° _ Cement type I __ Mix No./No. Sacks ._Mi}_#766 _ Air Content r Mcx. Aggregate 3 4 n - —- Admix. Amount: Brand: W A•E•�•�_— Admix. Amount: _ Brand: SetTest 0 Register Date Date Unit Total Area Unit Report - No. Days 1-lumber Recd Test Wt. Lood PSI No. I 3 2970 7-•29 7 -31 97,947 28.97 3460 19 7 2970 7-29 8 -• 4 28.27 28 29'70 7-29 8 -25 28.27 28 2.970 7-29 8 -25 28.27 Hold 2790 7-29 28.27 i Remarks: _ cc: City of Tigard orgen Consf.. qWX W ('unsrnrrtiun Inslmrion M Re-tiled Tisa Carlson Testing, Inc. --�� P.O.Box 23814 6 X 12 COWPM'L Tigard,Oregon 97223 REPORT OF TEST SPEC;MENS Phone(503)684-3460 _._ -- Date Molded: 7 -25 , 19 86� Job No. �2711--- Permit No. _ Client: ---- Mackenzie Saito 6 Assoc. --. --_— —— -- —� ---- f'roiect: — RFD PUb1.icationS _— Address: —Sandburgli Center -.-- -- Contractor JoEqen Const. ._ —__ Sub Confroctor. ------ Concrete Supplier: Western Pacif is _ Truck No.x65 Ticket No. 1945-17 ' Cast By: B. 0'r Test Time:7"j,5Load No. —_�_---- c'nnnor �.� — -- -- Fair- 75 55 _ —_ --- -- Temp. Nigh: Temp. low: — Weather: Panel. No. 5, 6, 11.. Location of Placement: ••— _Cu. Yds. _— __Concrete Temp: 3000 PSI ® 28 doy%Slump__4"__—___Cement Type I-LI Strength Requirement: _________�-- Mix No./No. Sacks — Mir #726 __ Air Content _._ Max. Aggregate Admix. Amount: Brand:"1�' _�•A. Admix. Amount:_____— Brand• _ —T Unit Report M Set Test® Register �Date r— Date Unit r—� Total A ea PSI i io No. Days Number Kec d Test wt._ _ l°°d — 1 6 :934 7-26 7 -31 _ 61,611 28.27 2180 1.8 2934 1-26 73,683 28.27 261.0 21 11 1 3 --4 —. 2E 2934 7-26 8 -22 — 28.27 Remarks: cc: City of Tigard - — -- - organ ons . Constmetion Inspection&Reisted 7lrats Carlson Testing, Inc. P.O.Box 23814 6 x 12 CC►NCRETE Tlge►d,Oregon 47223 REPORT OF TEST SPECIMENS Phone(603)664-34W Date Molded:_ 7 -25_, 19 86 lob No. CP-7.711—. Permit No. Client: Mackenzie Saito & Assoc. Project:._ RFD Publicdtions Address: _ Sandburgh Centel Contractor: Jorgen Const. — Sub Contractor: Concrete Supp';er: Western Pacific Truck No.2�— Ticket No. _ 1945_17__ Cast By:--13. OI rm - Test Time:7!,15. Lou i No. Weather: Fair_ _ Temp. High:75 e Temp. low: �5 11 6r . Location of Placement: Panel No. 5, _ Cu. Yds, Concrete Temp: Strength Requirement 3000 `PSI a 28 days5lump 4"_ —Cembnt Type I—II Mix Nr./No. Sacks Mix #726 Air Cuntent _ _ Max. Aggregate_ 3/4" Admix. Amount: drond:W-Z-A--K---A---- Admix. Amount — Brand: -- Shc Tezf® Register Date Date Unit Totol Area Unit 1 sport Na. Days Number Recd Test Wt. Load PSI_ No.- 1 6 2934 7-26 7 --31 61,611 28.27 2180 18 26 2934 7-26 8 -22 28.27 28 2934 7--26 8 -22 28.27 Remarks: Cc: City of Tigard orgen L'anst. ------ INSPECTION NOTICE City of Tigard Building Department P.O Box 23397 Tigard. Oregon 97223 Phone 639-4175 Type of Inspection Date Requested__% "2 Y _�` _ _ Tirm W _ A.M. P.M. Address Owner builder The following Building Code deficiencies are required to be corrected: I. P-Psented to _ — — pproved Inspector [� Disapproved Date CALL FOR REINSPECTION ❑ res L7 140 Construction lnspcvriun&KrhrrJ 7car Carlson Testing, Inc. 6 X 12 C.Oj+CPL'j�; �—_ P.O.Box 23814 REPORT OF TEST SPECIMENS ngArd,Oregon 97212 Phone(503)684-3450 Date Molded: 7 -22 T9 86 CP-2711 Pet.in�t No, Job No. _ Client: Mackenzie Saito & Assoc. !— Project: _-- RFD Publications ----- --- ------ -�-- - Address: Sandburgh Center — Jorgen Const. Contractor: — _— Sub Contractor: Concrete Supplier: _ Western Pacific 350533 _ Truck No. Ticket No. Cost B D. Tabert y' Test Time: 1.0:00 Load No. Overcast 75 —--- --55 _ Weather: _ Tem High-P• 9 Temp, lows Location of Placement: — Tilt panels #9, 10, 4, 7, 81 13, 1, 2, 3 " — — Cu. Yds. _ l-oncrete Temp: Strength Requirement: . 3000 28 4" I-1I —PSI ® —days Slump _ Cement Type_ Mix No./No. Sacks Mix #726 3/411 Air Content--________ Max. Aggregate Admin. Amount: — Brand: _— Admix. Amount:. Broad: Set Test® Register Date Date Unit Total — Unit Report No. Days — Nur, ber Recd Test Wt. Load Area PSI No. T 1 2880 7-23 7 -29 28.27 _ 53,416 _ 2070 17 — — 13 2680 7-23 8-4 71,420 28.27 --_ _ "1530 ?0 28 2880 7-23 8 -19 28.27 -- 85,013 3010 27 cc: City of Tigard Remarks: _— —_ �# A Con.stntction Inspection&krlArrlf Ti•sts Carlson Testing, Inc. 6 x 1.2 CONCRETE .^.O.Box 23014 REPORT OfTEST WCIMENS '1gird,Oregon 57223 Phone(503)6"-3460 7 •-22 86 CP-2711 Permit No. Date Molded: —_—_ 19 Job No. —._— MackF!nzie Saito & Assoc. Client: —. -- - ---- — ---- ---- RFD Publications Project: Address: .- Sandhurgh Center e— .___ :Jorgen Const.Contractor. �- Sub Contractor: Western Pacific350533 Concrete Supplier: )ruck No. __ Ticket No. Cost B D. Tabery 10:017 Y` y. -Y - Test Time: __ Load No. - ��Y-- Overcast 75 55 Weather: Temp. Hiqh: _---__ Temp. low: Tilt panels #9, 10, 4, 7, 8, 13, 1, 2, 3 Loca'ion of Placement: -- — - --- ---- ---- Cu. Yds. Concrete Temp: _ Strength Requirement: _ 3000^ — _ PSI ®�8 411_—_days Slump._ _—_._Cement Type Mix #726 3/411 Mix No./No. Sacks_ __ Air Content _---- Max. Aggregate — Admix. Amount: _ —__— Brand: _ — Admix. Amount: Brand: T Set Test(a Register Date Date Unit Total I Area Unit Report _ '4o. Days Number Recd Test —Wt. Load Psi No. 1 7 2880 7-23 7 -29 28.27 58,416 2070 17 i3 2980 7-23 8--4 71,420 28.27 2�i30 20 28 2880 7-23 8 -19 28.27 cc: City of Tigard Remarks: Jorigan Cumst - -- Construction Inspection&Related Tests Carmen Testing, Inc. 6 x 12 CCn4CRETE P.O.Box 23814 REPORT OF TEST SPECIMENS Tigard,Oregon 91223 Phone(503)664.3480 Date Molded: __ 7 —22 , 19 86 _ Job No. —'2711 — Permit No. Client: Mackenzie Saito & Assoc. Project: — RFD Publications Address: _ Sandburgh Center Jorgen Const. Contractor: Sub Contractor: Western Pacific 350533 Concrete Supplier: Truck No. — Ticket NO. —_ A_ Caste E . Tabert 10:00 Y: _ Tesr Time: load No. Overcast 75 55 _ Weather: _ _-- Temp. High: ,, Temp. Low: --- Tilt panels #9, 10, 4, 7, 8, 13, 1, 2, 3 Location of Placement: _ Cu. Yds. ----Concrete Temp: Strength Requirement: 3000 _ PSI 2P 4" I—II g eq ® _ � days Slump __Cement Type Mix No./No. Socks Mix #726._ Air Content_� Max. Aggregate 3/4" Admix. Amount Brand: Admix. Amount: Brand: Set Tost® Register Date vase Unit Total Area Unit Report` No. Gays Number Recd Test Wt. _ load PSI No. I 7 2880 7-23 7 —29 58,416 28.27 2070 17 28 2880 7-23 8 -19 28.27 ^� 28 2880 7-23 8 -19 28.27 cc: City of Tigard Remarks: —�_ jorqQA Congt —�_—_ -----.�_ INSPECTION NOTICE City of Tigard Building Department P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone 639-4175 Type of Inspection --- -_- --._____ -._ -44 1 ----.— r� Q Date Requested _/��I Time. A.M. ____P M. Address -- _— __f_— t5A.0yLl �!te C-, Permit #--------..- ----- Owner __ _ - - --- -- — _— -- — Lot ---- Builder ----- The following Building Code deficiencies are required to be corrected- Presented to �^ —_�..A -- f,44pprnved Inspector --�t_ "----- --._.— L l Disapproved Date 7� CALL FOR REINSPECTION C--1 YEs ❑ NO July 21, 1986 (CITYOF TI1FAW OREGON5 Year.*of SeMce 19614986 RFU Publications re: Building Permits #5893 6 5894 6960 SW Sandburg -, ilii g`aFa-OK.-972:.3 Dear Sir(s): This is to inform you of the discrepancies between the approved plans for sitework as reviewed by this office and the actual field inspection findings. You will be required to provide a retaining wall along any portion of the site that dopa not meet the minimum requirements of. Chapter 70, 1985 Uniform Building Code--specifically, the south side of the building where the new fill actually goes onto the adjoining property line. The requirements of Chapter 70 are enclosed for your convenience, and in lieu of these requirements a retaining wall must be provided. Please submit engineered drawings of the retaining wall for plan check and permit issuance by this office, along with the required fees. If you have any questions, please contact this office at 639-4171. Very truly yours, Thomas L. Plescher Building Inspector cc: Dan Young, Mackenzie/Saito 0690 SW Bancroft Portland OR 97201 r 13125 5W Nall Blvd.,P.O.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 CITY 01F T,GARD 639.4171 619 3 BUILDING PERMIT DATE July l6 -. 19 -�' TAX MAP __._LOT NO. _ SUBDIVISION �NIJ Pr�lic,�titsaa __ OWNER JOB ADDRESS Vitro Systems West BUILDER _ AJ)9'06 ISE 39t1i It, SULLC STATE REG NO. ____EXP.DAi"E __ _ Vancouver WA91�tS6Z i,--1 1,UILDER'S PHONE .—____.__ ARCHITECT PHONE OTHER STRUCTURE 1 I NEW L' REMODEL ' ADDITION REPAIR MOVE OTHER DEMOLITION RESIDENCE 1[ COMM EDUCATION IND RELIGIOUS ACCESSORY GARAGE L OTHER FENCE OCCUPANCY !il LAND USF ZONE BLDG TYPE '' FIRE ZONE _PLAN CHECK BY I-ll HEAT t-�latiat Lira ylirirl ; .r avm[�an� _] 1 ty�=Ftirn�n.l � I�i:�i: �� « �i l iii tar�r�tiitSkGd _ SEWER PERMIT N OCC.LOAD FLOOR LOAD HEIGHT NO STORIES AREA_ NO.BEDROOMS VALUE BUILDING DEPARTMENT — SET BACYS FRONT REAR LEFT SIDE RIGHT SIDE Permit b!1•y0 THIS PERMIT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN THE BUILDING CODE, ZONING — REGULATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES. AND IT IS HEREBY AGREED THAT THE Plan Check WORK WILL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODE'' AND ORDINANCES. THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT WAIVE PI.Ck.FIre _ RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS. CONTRACTOR AND SUB CONTRACTORS TO HAVE CURRENT CITY BUSINESS TAX PERMITS.SEPARATE PERMITS REOUIRED FOR Sr'VER.PLUMBING AND HEATING. State Tax 2.7y _ ~"SDC— Total /l 2.4 PDc,r APPLICANT 0H AGENT Prepd. — --- _ nonce eel.Due rill Receipt No. ADDRESS _ PHONE —_.__ -----_� Issued By �_... Approved By f wee +ttw �1 wr s �nttr �► �w T T--DATE NSP TYPE INSPECTION REMARKS i e _ r PLUMBING DATE Contractor I? WYA - -- --- - ---------- Rough to _ -� Fixture HEATING - Contractor —__w-------- -- — PeunitNo, Gasor0ii ----- - --- -------- --- --- ---- Rough in - — - — — - Final -- SEWER --- — Final DRIVEWAY — _— -- Final ---� Storm Drainage --� (Rain Drain)Final Sidewalk —•— Curb x Street Fina! Approach BLDG.DEPT.FINAL TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OCCUPANCY Final CERTIFICATE OCCUPANCY Landscaping Zoning Final Construction Inspection&Related 7csu Carlson Tesfing, Inc. P.O.Box 23814 6 X 12 COI-RETE Tigard.Oregon 07223 REPORT OF TEST SPECIMENS Phone(603)884-3480 Date Molded:.-_ 7 -16 19 86 Job No. CP-2711_—__ Permit No. Client: -_- Mackenzie Saito & Assoc, Project: - RFD Publicat i ons Address: _ SandbUah i7pnt-ar —T Contractor: jaraan C-nn-t Sub Contractor: Concrete Supplier: WPatprn Pari fir _ __ Truck No.359; Ticket No. _389.,14- Colt By: _C_ Starch _ Test Time: g,�� Load No. —_ Weather; Overcast _ _ Temp. High; _ 65 _ Temp. low: 50 Location of Placement: _Slab on grade pour #6� Cu. Yds. 27 _ Concrete Temp: Strength Requirement: Mmf) PSI ®_2A days Slump 3„ .Cement Type I-TT _ Mix No./No. Sacks Mix #742 Air Content _ Max. Aggregate. 31/4" Admix. Amount: Brand: Admix. Amount: Brand: Set Test® Register Date Date Unit Total Area Unit Report No. Das Number Recd Test Wt. Load PSI No. I 7 2840 7-17 7 -23 99,371 28,27 3520 1.5 28 2840 7-1.7 8 -13 135,090 2P.27 4780 26 28 2840 7-17 8 -13 133,243 28.27 4710 26 Remarks: _ cc:: City of Tigard ---- --- ---—�---- Jorge_n Const. tJEcLJv tok_ L4 4 ��96 Constvvction Insp"on&Related Tests Carl-son Testing, Inc. of 11CARD P.O.Box 23814 6 X 12 CONMRF:I� Tigerd,Oregon 07223 REPORT OF TEST SPECIMENS Phone(503)684-3460 Date Molded: 7 —16 , 19 86 Job No. _CE_Z71J_-__ Permit: No. Client: .__Mckenzie Saito & Msoc. Project: RFD PubliQLation9 Address: _59ndlaurah Cent _r Contractor:--,IfZgPn CnnGt_ Sub Contractor: Concrete Supplier: —Western Dani f is —_ Truck No.35_1& Ticket No. . Cast By: — �$t-ngch__ — Test Time: Load No. Weather: _Overcastt Temp. Nigh: __ 65 --- Temp. Low: 50 Location of Placement: Slab on grade pour #6 Cu. Yds. 27 Concrete Temp: Strength Requirement: _ 4'10fl-- PSI a_2fL____days Slump—3" Cement Type T—TT Mix No./No. Sacks Mix #742 Air Content_ _—_. Max. Aggregate-_3/A!L__ Admix. Amount: —_ Brand: Admix. Amount: Brand: Set Test® Register Date Date Unit Totcl Area Unit — Report No. Days Number Rec'd Test Wt. Load PSI No. 1 7 2840 7-17 7 -23 99,371 28.27 3520 15 28 2940 7-17 8 -13 28.27 28 2840 7-17 8 -13 28.27 Remarks: cc: City of Tigard Jorgen Const. Construction/nspet-riun&Relatrd 7csts Carlson Testing, Inc. P.U.Box 23814 REPORT OF 6 x 12 CONCItom TEST SPECIMENS Tigard,Oregon 97223 - Phone(503)684-3460 Date Molded: -1 -..15—_, 19X36— Job No. 01.2711 Permit No. Client: Mackenzie Ha i to & ssrr Project: RFD--aihl i ca ions— ---A_ - — _---- -------...-- Address: ___5Andburgh -nter —.`— —.--- _ -------_-- - Contractor: Jol:gpn C onGt_ —__—_ Sub Contractor: Concrete Supplier: Western Pac=i f ir_ Truck No.14� Ticket No. 299-13 Cast By: _. H Pay_gon _ _ Test Time: — — load No. _ Weather: Overcast _ Temp. High: 70 Terip. Low: —_50 Location of Placement: Slab on grade lines PE tc DD' and DD' to CC' , 1 to 7 _ Cu. Yds. _ —Concrete Temp: — Strength Requirement: — 4000 PSI ® 2A days Slump —4' _Cement Type_L�_.� Mix No./No. Suck-, Mix #742 Air Content _-_ Max. Aggregate Admix. Amount: _ Brand:W/A-F A Admix. Amount: ___ Brand: Set Test a Register Date Date Unit Total Unit Report No. Days Number Recd Test Wt. Load Area PSI No. 1 7 2832 7-16 7 -22. 90,769 28.27 .3210 14 28 2832. 7-16 8 -12 119,810 28.27 4240 25 28 2832 7-16 8 -12 118,543 28.27 4190 25 Remarks: CC: City of Tigard orgen Const. i Construction Inspection&ke/atrd 7cara Carlson 'Testing, Inc. ' 6 x 12 CONC12);�'E P.(.Box 23814 REPORT OF TEST SPECIMENS Tigard,Oregon,47223 —� Phone(503)684-3180 Date Molded: -_—1l, 19_ qfi_. Job No. rp--7711 Permit No. Client: Ma �k n7'p s,�i Project: RFD Rihl is-ationn Address: ❑ • ___ Contractor: JornPn Const_ Sub Contractor: Concrete Supplier: -_ We-gtArn pari f it _ Truck No.34-1 — Ticket No. Cast By: ji_ Payson Test Time: _ Load No. Weather; _ Overcast 70 50 Temp. High: Temp. Low- Location o1 Placement: Slab on grade. -- - Cu. Yds. Concrete Temp: Strength Requirement: — 4000 _ PSI ® ,2_R _days Slump—4"' Cement Type_I____ Mix No./No. Sacks Mix #742 — Air Content_ Max. Aygregate`- -344!1 ____ Admix. Amount: _. _ Brand:WZA,_E_A- Admix. Amount: _ Brand: Set Test® —Register Date Date UnitF Total Uni! Report No. Days Number Recd Test Wt. Load Area pSl No. I� 7 2832 7-16 7 -22 90,769 28.27 3210 14 — 28 2832 7-16 8 -12. 28.27 — 28 2832 7-16 8 -11 28.27 Remarks: CC: City o` Tigard orgen Const. --..--- -- - ------- -.__—_--- - OF CITYRD 839.4171 71e s— 19 BUILDINGG PERMIT pgtE j7��_�/ OWNER TAX MAP LOT NO. SUBDIVISION (_( (/1� JOBADDHESS BUILDER �// .�STATE REG.NO EXP DATE BUILDER'S PRUNE .. --- ARCHITECT PHONE OTHER _ STRUCTURE ❑ NEW L_1 REMOUEL_ 0IT10N f 1 REPAIR I-_i MOVE I I OTHER I 1 DEMOLITION ( 1 RESIDENCE I r-C ( 1 EDUCATION f .' IND I RELIGIOUS I I ACCESSQr"Y�I I GARAGE i 1 OTHER C] FENCE OCCUPANCY B•-�LAND USE BLDG.TYPE A� _ _ FIRE ZONE-------PLAN CHECK BY t.�r��HEAT SEWER PERMIT N OCC.LOAD FLOOR LOAD }011013141---^------�y NJ BEDROOMS_ VALU b 13 C BUILDINGUEPARTMENT __ SET BACKS FRONT - ; �— _ LEFT SIDE RIGHT SIDE Permit --�-�►� THI£ PERMIT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE REGULA'IONS CONTAINL IN THE BUILDING CODE, ZONING REGULATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES, PND IT IS HEREBY AGREED THAT THE Plan„heck WORK WILL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND IN COMPLIANCE PI.Ck.Fire WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES. THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT WAIVE RESTRICT c COVENANTS. CONTRACTOR AND SUB CONTRACTORS TO HAVE CURRENT CITY BUSINESS vZ Stale Tax 1 /—1 TAX PERIAITS,SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR SEWER,PLUMBING AND HEATING. Total SDC— �+PP Rrepd. PDCN LICANT OR AGENT -- Receipt No. ADDRESS — -- Be'.Due / --�- PHONE -.- issua j B� �. Approved By_______ - INSPECTION N TICE C, 'y of Tigard Building Department P O Box 23397 Tigard. Oregon 97223 { Phone. 639-4175 Type or✓) f Inspection ._..— -_--- ---_.�_- Date 1equested---�: Time A.M._—_-P.M. Address 16, �G C'+�'��'� - ---- Permit # - Owner _—Logy- 61 — — Loi Builder_ - --- - -- ---- — -------The following Building Code deficiencies are required to be corrected: - i Presented to Approved Inspector __- _ _ Disapproved Date CALL FOR REINSPFCTION ❑ YES IA NO i� W'qWAWLW (:onafrtsrNon►nRprNon&►lr/atrd 7�.crc Carlson Testing, Inc. �'�►�� 1 .� 1986 REPORT OF 6 x 12 C lclu flamP.O.sox 23814 TEST SPECIA BENS 'ngerd.Oregon 97223 Y Phone(503)664-3460 Date Molded: _ 7 -1.1 19 86 CP-2711 job No. — Permit No. C,Iient; _ Mackenzie Saito & Assoc, Project: RFD F'ublieations Address: Sandburgh Center Contractor: Jc.rgQn `--------- -- _ Sub Contractor: Concrete Supplier: WI?atarn _- Truck No.?. —, Ticket No. 108984 _ Cast BY: W. �hr�r i hal Test Time: -- food No. Weather; Overcast -_ -`__'---- —_�----- — Tamp. High: __ 72 Temp. low: 57 Location of Placement: Slab on grade. —Cu. Yds. . Concrete Temp: Strength Requirement: — 4000 , PSI do %Slum " y p---g---_ Cement Type_L�-- Mix No./No. Socks x Mi42 -- -Z— Air Content_ _. Max. Aggregate Admix. Amount: - — Brand: w/A.E.A. Admix. Amount: Brand: Sef Test® Register Dote Date Unit---- ni— 't No. Days Number Recd Test Wt. load Area Unit Report I 7 2810 7-14 7 -18 — 79,711 28.27 PSI No. 2820 13 28 2810 7-14 8 - 8 --- ------ -- — - — 113,699 28.27 4020 24 28 2810 7-14 8 - 8 113,745 18.27 4050 24 Rernorks: CI: C.itY of Tigard —" Jorgen Const. _ --- -----__—_-- Construction Inspection&Related rests Carlson Testing, Inc. P.O.Box 23814 6 x 12 COWMEIF Tigard,Oregon 97223 REPORT OF TEST SPECIMENS Phone(503)664-3460 Date Molded: _... 7 -11. _ 19 86_ Joh No. CT-2711 _ Permit NC. Client: _ Mackenzie Saito & Assoc. — Project: RFD Publications --- — Address: Sandburgh Center -� ------ — Contractor: Joruen Const. Sub Contractor: Concrete Supplier: Western pati f ic- Truck No.233 Ticket No. Cast By: W_sSrher i hpl _ Test Time: — Load No. _— 3 Weather: Overcast Temp. High:— 72 Temp. Low: _ 57 Location of Placement: Slab on grade. --� - -- — _Cu. Yds. Concrete Temp: _ Strength Requirement: 4000_ _PSI ®._2$-_—days Slump_A" _Cement Type I-II Mix No.l No. Sacks Mlx�742 — Air Content —_ _-_ Max. Aggregole—IZAL_— Admix. Amount: — Brand:W/A.E.A. Admix. Amount: Brand: Set Test® Register Date Date Unit Total Area Unit Report No. Days Number Recd Test -_Wt. load _ PSI No. 1 7 2810 7-14 7 -18 79,711 28.27 2820 13 28 2810 7-14 P - 8 28.27 281 2810 7-14 8 - 8 28.27 Romat .s: _ cc_ C:i.tp of V yard - -— _-- ---- -- _ J :n_JP-n Const. Constnn-tinn Ins/rectiun M Related Testa Carlson Testing, Inc. 6 x 12 Concrete P.O.Box 23814 REPORT OF TEST SPECIMEN,, Tigard,Oregon 97223 — Phone(503)684-3460 Date Molded: 7 -9 19 86 lob No. _CT-2810 _ Permit No. Client: Juhr Corporation Project: .- Phil Lewis Elementary School Addn. Address: 12615 S.W. 72nd, Tigard Contractor: _ Juhr Const. Sub Contractor: Concrete Supplier: Ross island _ Truck No.21 Ticket No. A-146267 Cast Ily: _ H• Payson Test Time: load No. 1 «rercast 75 55 Weather: Temp. High:_ _ Temp. low: _ Conference room #42 - work rocxn #44 and passage #42B (slab) . Location of Placement: 8 71 —Cu. Yds. �.Concrete Temp: Strength Requirement: _.� 00 PSI ®_ 28 daysSli mp 2n Cement Tvae I _ Mix No./No. Sacks Mix #300nB Air Content Max. Aggregate_ 3/411 _ Admix. Amount: Brand: _ Admix. Amount: —�— Brand: Set Test® Register Date Date Unit Total I Area Unit Report No. Days Number Recd Tes! Wt. Load PSI No. 1 7 2777 7-10 7 -1_6 75,95"7 28.27 2690 3 7 2777 7-10 7 -16 75,290 28.27 2660 3 28 2777 7-10 8 - 6 104,970 28.27 3710 6 28 2777 7-10 8 - 6 103 503 28.27 3660 6 cc: City of Tigard Remarks: •w +s r>• ss�r Constmi-tion/nt/xv6on&Related 7 rsts Carlson Testing, Inc. 6 x 12 CONCRLM P.O.Box 23814 REPORT OF TEST SPECIMENS Tigard,Oregon 97223 -- — Phone(503)684-3460 7 -8 86 CP-2711. Permit No. Date Molded: 19— Job No. Mackenzie Saito & Assoc. Client: RFD Publications Project: ---- ---- --- -- -- Address: - Sandburgh Center Jorgen Const. Contractor: ____ �_._. Sub Contractor: _ Western Pacific 355 1084'21-13 Concrete Supplier: Truck No. Ticket No. __-_— Cast B C Stasch Test Time: 8:10 load No. 2 — — Overcast 75 42 Weather: Temp. High: — —. Temp. Low: Slab on grade nearest building pour #1. Location of Placement: 9.5 69 _--__— Cu. Yds. _ —Concrete Temp: Strength Requirement: 4000 PSI a 28 days Slump 31f _-- Cement Type_1—II Mix #742 3/4" Mix No./No. Sacks -- Air Content_—�_— � Max. Aggregate Admix. Amount _ Brand:W/A.E,.A. _ Admix. Amount: Brand: Set Test® Register Date Date Unit Total Area Unit Report No, Days Number Recd Test Y Wt. Load PSI No. I 7 2761_ 7-9 7 -15 28.27 112,850 3990 12 -- 28 2761 7-9 8 - 5 28.27 — _ _ 133 861_ 4740 23 _ — 28 2761 7--9 8 - 5 _ 29.27 — _ 132,395 1 4680 23_—_ cc: City of Tigard Remarks: CunstnuYit, Im/a•criren K Nr/arcJ%cars Carlson Testing, Inc. 6 x 12 COROI PO Box 23814 REPORI OFNC _ TEST SPECIMENS Tlgard,Oregon 97223 Phone 1503)684-34(10 7 -8 86 CP-2711 1't�nlu t No Dare Molded: , 19 Job No Client: Mackenzie Saito b Assoc. —_ P•r,lect: RFD Pablication8 — - — Address Sandburgh Center -- - Contractor: - Jorgen Const. -- -_ _ Sub Contractor. Concrete Supplier. - Western Pacificj55 — 108421-13 ---- _.�_ Truck No. _ Ticket No. Cast By: C. Stasch 8:10 2 Test Time: _ load No. 0,rercast 75 42 Weather: Tem High:P• g : _ — Temp low: location of Placement: Slab on grade nearest building pour #1 . 9.5 69 Cu. Yds. Concrete Temp: _ Strength Requirement: _ 4000 28 311 I—II PSI --days Slump Cement Type— Mix No,/No Sacks_ Mix #742 3/4" Air Content__-- Max Aggregate WDA.E.A. Admix. Amount: Brand: Admix. Amount. Brand. _ Set Test a I Register Dote Date Unit Total Unit Report No. Days Number Recd Test wt. _ Load Area PSI No. I 7 2761 7-9 7 -15 28.27 28 112. 850 3990 12 _2761 7-9 8 �- 5 28.27 28 2761 4 7-9 8 - 5 28.27 cc: Cityof Tigard Remarks: _ t. P.O. BOX 177 • TUALAIIN, OREGON 97062 • PHONE 602.2601 R. F. D. PUBLICATIONS June 30, 1986 6960 S. W. Sandburg Ln. Tigard, OR 97223 18108- 1 2543 -045-000 Insp. Type RAS Dear Kevin Long, This is a Fire and Life Safety Plan Review for an automatic fire protection system. This plan review is predicated on the P:ational Fire Protection Association Standard No. Thirteen ( 13) This revtpw does not cover information for insurance credit. NFPA 1 ? Sec 1-11 A copy of the contractor 's material and test certificate shall be forwarded to this office after completion of all testing and flushing. NFPA 13 Sec 1-11 Where wet automatic sprinkler equipment is subject to freezing, it shall. be protected by providing heat or in- sulation to maintain a minimum temperature of 40 degrees F. NFPA 1.3 Sec 3-10. 1. 1, 3-1.0. 1 2, 5-2. 5. 1 Install sl?eves around all piping that passes through ulalls, floors, platforms and foundations. NFPA 13 Sec 3-10 3. 4 The installer shall properly identify this hydraulically designed automatic sprinkler system by a permanently attached placard indicating the location, and basis of design (di -,charge density over designed area of discharge, including gallons per minute and residual pressure dei-.and ) at base riser. See NEPA 1#13, Figure A-7. 1. 2, Sample Namep late NFPA 13.1 Sec 7-1. 2 The following tests shall be witnessed by a me-nber of this Fire District 's Fire Prevention Office staff- Please call for an appointment no less than 24 hours in Advance. NLWPA I_?, Sec 1-1. 1 . I Hydrostatically test the automatic sprinkler systern(s ) as specified in NFPA 13 Sec 1-11. 3. i I MiRM1 Ufl � � M � �1 � I HE PUME OP 0 BOX 127 • TUALATIN. OREGON 47062 • PHONE 687.2601 All alerm functions shall be- tested. !,,"--PA 13 Sec 1-11 All drain facilities shall be testlyd with the ccotrol valve of the drain or inspectors tert wide open P :=PA 13 Sec 1-11 . 'i and 2-9. 1 Water flow, air maintenance, and control valves shall. be supervised in compliance with NP-PA Standards 72 series by an approvod central, proprietary or remote st-Ation service or a local alarm which will give an audible signal at a con- stantly attended location. UBC 3803 !,FPA St,is 72 Install not less than twelve ( 12) spare automatic sprinkler heads in a cabinet and provide a head 1lrrench . NFNA 13 Tec '?-lr 7 Approval of submitted plans is not an approval of onissi.ons or oversights by this office or of non-compliance 1-;ith any :Ipplicable regulations of local government. Tf you desii e a conference regarding this plan or if you have questions: please feel free to contact me at ( 503) 682-2601 jSinerely Gere Birchill Fire Prevention Bureau �[ a1 � et �► Construction Inspection&.RelLted Testx Carlson Testing, Inc. 6 X 12 C'.ONC.'FtE,'i'13 P.J.Box 23814 REPORT OF TEST SPECIMENS Tigard,Oregon 07223 Phone(503)684-348A Date Molded: 6 -27 , 19 86 Job No. CP-2711 Permit No. Client: Mackenzie Saito b Assoc. Project: RFD Publications _ Address: Saar►dburgh Center Contractor: JOrgen Const. .iub Contractor: Concrete Supplies: Western Pacify_ Truck No. 357 —� Ticket No. 10710671 Cost By H. Payson Test Time: Load No. _ 1 Weather: ! Fair Temp. High: _ 90 —�_ Temp. low: �5 Location of Placement: All footings. Cu. Yds. 9 _. Concreie Temp: _ Strength Requirement: 2500 PSI ® 28 Slump days 3 4" Y P--1 1--Cement Type I Mix No./No. Socks Mix #718 —_ Air Content_ _ Max. Aggir-gate- 3ZV Admix. Amount: — Brand: W/A.E.A•_�— Admix. Amount: — Brand: _ — Set Test® Register Date Date Unit Total Ares Unit Report No. Days Number Recd Test Wt, load PSI_ No. 7 2783 6-28 7 - 4 28.27 - __ 69,767 2470 li _2783 6-28 7 -25 95,754 28.27 3390 16 2783 6-28 7 -25 94,767 28.27 3350 16 Remarks- - CC: City of Tigard orge1 ons —_--- —_ --�— — ---- ------ —- ---- asp � •w �1 +� � tai Cor,stnrction lnspat-tion&IRrlated Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. P.O.Box 23014 6 x 12 C'�ONCREW Tigard,Oregor.97223 WORT OF TEST SPECIMENS Phone(503)684-3460 Date fvlolded: _6 -27 19 86_ Job No. CP-2711 Pennit W). Client: Mac,cenzie Saito & Assoc. _ M s _�-__ - Projecf: _.—RFD Publications _ � Address: —Sandburgh Center -- Contractor: __ J0ry211 Const. _ Sub Contractor: �_— -- --_--_— Concr+ute Supplier: _ Stern Pacific -._ _ Truck No. 357 Ticket No. Cast B'V: — H — Test Time: — — load No. 1 Fair _ Temp. High: 80 Temp. low: . 55 Weather: — All footings. locati,3n of Placement: _Cu. Yd9s. Concrete Temp: Strangth Requirement: _ 1500 PSI ® 28 daysSlump_ Cement Type I _. Mix Na./No. Sacks _ Mix #718 Air Content Max. Aggregate Admix Amount: _ _ Brand: W/A.E.A. _ Admix. Amount: Bio-n�d--- Set Test a Registor Date Date Unit Total Area � Unit Report No. Das Number Recd Test Wt. load L8. PSI IJo._7 2783 6-28 7 - 4 769,767 2470 1.128 2783 6-28 7 -25 7 28 2783 6-28 7 -25 28.27 Remarks: cc' City of. Tigard orgen Const. Vass ss nn (:onrtrurNon lnapert{on&Related 7'sara Carlson Testing, Inc. 4 x 8 Grout P.U.Box 23914 REPORT OF TEST SPECIMENS Tigard,Oregon 97223 Phone(503)994-3490 Date Molded:_ 5 -19 — 19 86 Job No. ('F-2711 Permit No. Client: Mackenzie/Saito Assoc. Project: RFD Publications --- — Address: 6960 S.W. Sandberg Road `----�--�- - Jorgens Const. ----� Contractor: _ Sub Contractor: Concrete Supplier: Western Pacific _ Truck No.339__ Ticket No. `101236 — Cast By: W. Scheribel � I Test Time: Load No. _ 1 Clear 70 46 Weather: Temp. High: __- Temp. low: _— Walls @ compressor room and parapet. Location of Placement: --- Cu. Yds. Concrete Temp: 811 Strength R� nt: 3000 Fl avable uirem PSI ® 28 daysSlump Cement Type Mix No./No. Sacks _- Mix $ 887 Air Content Max. Aggregate.— Admix. ggregate.—Admix. Amount:_ Brand: _ Admix. Amount: Brand: _ Set Test® Register Date Date Unit Total Unit--Report No. Das Number Recd Test Wt. Load Area PSI No. T 7 2265 5-20 5 -26 1.6 sq i 55,825 3490_ 6 28 2265 5-20 6 -16 16 sq ' - - 71,824 __ 4490 10 28 2265 5-20 6 -16 16 sq i — 71,040 4440 10 cc: ,Jorgens CA)nstruction �- Remarks: ._ -t3 }• e€ �4gef`;�---- --- --- —_ wsr � >tw +� w aer xssw Construction/n.apecrion&Related Tests Carlson Testing, Inc. 4 x 8 Grout P.O.Box 23814 REPORT OFTigard,Oregon 97223 — —_ TEST SPECIMENS Phone(503)684-3460 Date Molded: 5 –19 19 86 lob No. CP-2711 v Permit No. Client: _ Mackenzie/Saito Assoc. Project: RFD Publications Address: 6960 S.W. Sandberg Road Jorgens Const. Contractor: _ Sub Contractor: Western Pacific 339 101-236 Concrete Supplier: Truck No. _ � Ticket No. .—__—_ Cast By: W. Scheribel Test Time: _ Load No. 1 Clear —� 70 46 Weather: _ __ Temp. I igh: _ .— Temp. low: Walls @ compressor roam and parapet. Location of Placement: Cu. Yds. .—Concrete Temp: 811 3000 28Flowable Strength R uire nt: ___ PSI _days Slump _____._Cement Type sacs Mix No./No. Sacks_ (`fix_# 887 _ Air Content-_. Max. Aggregate Admix. Amount: — Brand: .__ Admix. Amount: _—_ Brand: Set Test(a Register Date Date Unit —Total Unit Report _No. Days Number_ Recd Test Wt. Load Area PSI No. 17 2265 5-20 5 -26 55,825 1.6 sq i n 3490 6 28 2265 5-20 6 -16 16 sq i 28 2265 5-20 6 -16 16 sq In cc: Jorgens Construction Remarks: __ r"ity of min l__-- Gonstmetion Insperrly '� Carlson Testing, - T16 ,9 Inc.. 86 P. 6 x .12 (--ONCRE'PE Tigard,Orego REPORT Of TEST SPECIMENS ep 23 -- -----� Phone(503)884-3480 Date Molded: 5 —14 , 19_BSL_ lob No. CP-2711 Permit No. Client: �S'�]7+.1fl_.$dito & Aa�toc_ Project: _ RFT) Ash] i r At-i nnc — Address: —Satx]h).rnh Celaf-,ter Contractor: ___,late,- Sub Contractor: _ Concrete Supplier: —�ehs1 Qrn uaciaFie Truck No.356 Ticket No. --x0niQIIz81 1T Cast By: _VQrt-- _ —_ Test Time: Load No. Weather: _,_ Cloudy Temp. High: 62 Temp. low: 40 Location of Placement: �Wition #4 slab between line (7-9) (A'—B' ) , Cu. Yds. _ Concrete Temp: Strength Requirement: _ _dl?OQ-_ PSI a-2.a— days Slump_3,0 Cement Type Mix No./No Sacks__, Mix 0747 Air Content _ Max. Aggregate----4/4— Admix. Amount: _— Brand: _ Admix. Amount: _ Brand: — Set Test® 1 Register Date Date —Unit Total Area Unit Report No. Days Numbar Recd Test Wt. Load PSI No. 7 2211 5-15 5 -21 1'4,550 28.27 4050 4 — I 28 2211 5-15 6 -11 135,830 28.27 4810 9 28 2211 5_17 6 -1.1 136,713 28.27 4840 Remarks: _ oo:_ CltVof Tigard_ Jorgen Gorst. __.� -----_--- - ---------- construction Inupection&Rrlaf,d Tcsys Carlson. Testing, Inc, P.O.Box 23814 6 x 12 ODNO Tigard,Oregon 97223 RFPORI OF TEST SPECIMENS Phone(503)6d4-3460 Data Molded: ---5 -14 19 Job No. 5V--2 J— Permit No. Client: ---JMqkenzie Project: Address: . qan(JhurrI1L-f',-ntcar Contractor: Sub Contractor: Concrete Supplier: Truk Nojr�--- Ticket No. Cost By: Test Loud No. . 2 Weather: — Cloudy Temp. High: -- 62 Temp. Lo.: _ 40 Locotion of Placement: Addition #4 slab between line (7-9) (A'-Bv Cu. Yds. -- Concrete Temp: Strength Requirement: ___Aj00Jj___ PSI a _2g--days Slump Ito .—Cement Type Mix No./No. Sacks AirCoritevit- - Max. Aggregate Admix. Amount: --- Brand:w,/A v Admix. Amount: --- Brand: -.--- eport Set Test 0 Register Date Date Unit Total Area —Umt Rec'd Test Wt. Load PSI --No. Days T, No. Do Number S, _;- 7 2211 5-15 E5 -21_ 114,550 — 28.27 4050 4 28 2211 5-15 0' — 28.27 28 2211 5-15 6 -11. 28.27 Remarks: cc: City of Tigard -- ,Jorgen Const. low ,y Constriction Inspection&Related Tests Carlson Tesfing, fuLco P.O.Box 23814 6 x 1`2 CONCRETE Tigard,Oregon 97'223 REPORT OF fEST SPECIMENS Phone(503)684-3469 Dote Molded: 5 —13 19 86 _ Job No. CP-2711 Permit No. Client: Mackenzie Saito rx Assoc. Project: M Publications Address: - Sandturgh Center e^, Contractor. Jorgen Const. — Sub Contractor: -- —_— -- Concrete Supplier: western Pacific _�--� _ Truck No.364 Ticker No. 100134-13 Cast By: M. Tabert _._ — Test Time: 8_30 Load No. 1_ Cloudy 59 45 Weothb : Temp. High: Tamp. low: Nor'rh half of addition #4 lin 7' to 9' slab. Location of Placement: 30 Cu. Yds. .. Concrete Temp: Streoigth Requirement: _ 4000 —PSI a 28 4"_days Slump _ Cement Type Mix #742 Max. A re me-3//411 Nix No./No. Sacks -..._ Air Content� —__ 9© A - Admix. Amount: Brand:W/A.E.A_ Admix, Amount:_ Brand: Set Test® Register Date Date Unit Total Area Unit Report No. Days Number Need Test Wt. `load — PSI No. 7 2192 5--14 5 -20 99,371 28.27 3520 3 28 21.92 5-14 6 -10 126,780 28.27 4480 8 28 2192 5-14 6 -10 28.27 125.236 4430 8 I cc: City of Tigard Remarks: — — --- — — Ty t rrn.rnr.rirrn/n.spe<rion Eft Rebtcd 7;rsrs Carlson Testing, Inc. P.0 'tox 23814 6 X 12 CONS_<I"I'i Tigeru,Oregon 97225 REPORT OF TEST SPECIMENS Phone(503)684-1460 Date Molded: _ 5 —1.3 _, 19 86 Job No. CP-2711 [vrinit No. Client: -___-- Mackenzie Saito & Assoc_— Project: --- -- FtFD Publications --^--_ -- - Address: ---_Sandburgh Center __ -- -- Contractor: _._ -- Jorgen Const-, Sub Controctor: — — ----- _ Concrete Supplier: __ ------ Western, Pacific Truck No.364 —_ Ticket No. _ 100134-13 _t Test Time: 8:30 Cast By: -- M. Taber — load No. _ 1 —___ .— — _ --—— 59 45 Cloudy Weather. Temp. High:__� .-_-- Temp. low: __-- -- —. —� North half of addition #4 lin 71 to 9' slab. Location of Placement: _ --- — - —� 30 Cu. Yds. Concrete Temp: Strength Requirement: _ 4000 _ PSI ra 28 days Slump Orr ;ement Type Mix #742 r Max. Aggregate 3,/4rr — Mix No J No. Sacks —._ — Air Con ent —v _`—_-_-- Admix. Amount: Brand:! /A,E*A, Admix. Amount: Brand: _-_— — --_ — Set Test( — Register Date Date Unit Total AreUnit Report No. Days Number Recd Test Wt. load --T PSI No.— No. 2192 5-14 5 -20 99,37]. 28.27 3520 I 3 28 2192 5-14 6 -10 28.27 2192 —I 5-14 6 -10 _— 28.27 cc: City of Tigard _— Remarks: — i INSPECTION NOTICE' City of Tigard Btf lding Department ►J.0 Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone 639-4175 M. Type of Inspection — Date Requested Address _ �� L��— —.-- Permit #-- f Owner --_ _ _ Lot -- Widder - -------- -----------� The fallowing Building Code deficiencies are required to be corrected: Presented to --y— 4-1; P;o,ved i Inspector `" f' Li Disapproved Date _ AI•L FOR REINSPECTION ❑ YE$ ❑ NO r� Construction/n.slwt-don&Related I-sts Elson Testing, Inc. P.O.[lox 23914 6 X 12 CQNCR[,'I�F; Tigard,Oregon 97223 REPORT OF _ _^ TEST SPECIMENS Phone(503)684-3460 Date Molded: 4 -29 19 86� Job No. CFS-2711 Petini.t No. Client: __—Mackenzie Saito & Assoc. Project: RFU Publications Address: 6960 S. W. Sandberg Koa:l Contractor: �`TorgP:1 Const. Sub Contrac'or: — Concrete Supplier: _,Western Pacific Trvck No.378 _, Ticket Vo. 98380 _ Cast By: _- C.M. Yuckert Test Timo: ._ load No, Weather: ___ Cloudy Temp. High: . 58 58 -- Temp. Low: ._ 41 Foundation walls. Location of Placement: 18.5 Cu. Yds. ___ Concrete Temo: Strength Requirement: — 2500 DSI ® 28 days Slump_4° Cement Type Mix No./No. Sacks_ Mix #718 _ Air Content � Max. Aggregate --- — M — Admix. Amount! _ _ Brand:w/A•E•A• _ Admix. Amount: Brand: — Set rand:Set Test Register Date Date Unit Total Area Unit Report No. Days Numbe- Recd rest wt. Load PSI No. 7 2109 4•-30 5 - 6 65,950 28.27 2330 2 28 2109 4-30 5 -27 91,599 28.27 3240 7 28 2109 4-30 5 -27 90,746 26.27 3210 7 Remarks: _ CC: City� Tigard _— t �r Con,niction/narcction&Related Testa Carlson 'T°esting, Inc. P.O.Bax 23814 6 x 12 (`pNCRL�'E Tigard,Oregon 97223 REPORT OF TEST SPECIMENS Phone(503)04-34W 4 -2986 Job Na. CP-2711 Permit No. Date Molded: 19------ Mackenzie Saito & Assoc. __ ----- - �- -- - Client: Project: RFD Publications --- Address: -_ 6960 S.-W. Sardbery Road —� _ — -- --- -- Jor en const. _ Sub Contractor: ------ — -� Contractor. _—4 ------ -_- - Concrete Supplier: Western-Pacific Truck No.378____-. Ticket Nc — Test Time: _ Load No. - T Cast 9y: _ C.M. Yuckert -- :auudy Temp. Nigh: 58 —8------- Temp. low: 41— Wirather: ._—.-_ — Foundation walls, _-- --_--_ --- --- -- Location of Placement: -" --�— - --- 18.5 Concrete temp: Cu. Yds. __- StrengthRequirement: --. 2500__________PSI @?8 daysSlump� Cement Type n _ Mix No./No. Sacks .—. Mix #718 Air Content May.. AggreAnte w A.E.A_ Admix. Amount: Brand: — Admix. Amount: Brond: - _-�16_550 — _ Unit Report Set Test® Registe Date Dat Wt. a PSI No. No. Days Number Recd Tes—__ — 7 2109 4-30 5 - 6 7 2330 2 —_ - .72$ 2109 4-30 5 -27 28 2109 4-30 5 -27 7 City of Tigard — - ---- (;nnstntrtirrn tlKtKl'hllll�KCI If[ � lfsr. Carlson Testing, Inc. P.O.Bot 23814 6 x 12 COWL; OI'E nerd,Or on 97223 REPORT UF___ TEST SPECIMENS Phone(50 684-3460 Date Molded: 4_-25 _, 19_86 lob No. -P-97.1-1- Permit No. Client: 1 k n .i(- c i i n & Asscx,_ Project: — Plit-31 i rat 1 - Address: 6960 S. W. Sand)erg Road Contractor: _,IIICgpn Cht3St- -. ___ — Sub Contractor: ._.____ Concrete Supplier: WostQrn Pacc Truck No.3g2 T;ckei No. 9�srr'3-c'r— Cost By: . _� _ �—_—� _ Test Time: }2�rLoad No. Weather: Overcast �— i_ Temp. High: 55 _ Temp. Low: 40 _ Location of Placement: Footings 9 and 1 line. --- Cu. Cu. Yds. —'7 Concrete Temp: Strength Requirement: - )inn _ PSI ®. 2R_--days Slump_-4r1_ -Cement Tyoe Mix No./No. Sacks—MiY !!fig_ — Air Content -_, Max. Aggregate__ 3,14" Admix. Amount: Brand: _ Admix. Amount: Brand: _- Set rest a Register Date Date Unit Total Area Unit Report No. flays Number Recd Test Wt. Load — PSI No.- 7 2092 4-26 5 - 2 59,721 28.27 2110 1 28 2092 4-26 5 -23 100,650 28.27 3560 5 28 2092 4-26 5 -23 29,723 28.27 3.53 5 Remarks: CC: City of Tigard Jorgen Const. Consi-ruction Inspection Rt bt rif li%ifs Carlson Tesfing, Ince P.O.Box 23814 REPORT OF b x 12 CONO-0,M TEST SPECIMENS Tigard,Oregon 97223 Phone(503)6M-3460 Date Molded: 19 86 Job No Permit No. Clierc E+aJtn & ASS012. Project: bjhl is-all-inn-z Address: 6960 S. W. Sandberg Road Contractor: Jnrigon Crinst- Sub Contractor: Concrele Supplier: ctcrn one-ifiq Tr ick NO-302 Ticket No. Cost By: Test lime: Load Nc. Weather: Overcast T,,gmp. High: 55 Temp. Lo, 40 Location of Placement: Footings 9 and 1 line. --Cu. Yds. — 7 Corcretc Temp: Strength Requirement: PSI a 2@ -_day%Slump Cement Type Mix No./No. Sacks Air C,-ntent Max. Aggregate Admix. Amount: ___ Brand: Admix. Amount: __ Brand: Set Test a Register Date Date Unit Total Area Unit Report PSI No. No. Days Number Rec'd---_Test Wt. Load 7 2092 4-26 5 - 2 59,721 28.27 2110 1 28 2092 426 5 --)3 28.27 28 2092 4-26 5 -23 2.8.27 Remarks: ___C_�, : City Of Tigard Jorgen Const. INSPECTION NOTICE City of Tigard Building Department P O Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 N✓f�+� t Phone:639-4175 Type of Inspecfion _- . _ r Date Requested.— --_—_._ �^ ,Jam_ Time A.M. P.M. Address _� .._.J2 L1 s� ,��i Permit Owner-__._--- -- —__-- Lot #_ Builder The following Building Coda deficiencies are required to be corrected: _►,Z-._t'B��T�.._.�r.:��L�,t_� Tr.�h,r:_::� I N.__.F_S2�'f:L�� _._ r, A A.2–S. J 3 t I Presented to -.---- Approved Inspector �--- [� Disapproved Date CALL FOR REINSPECTION O YES 1j?rN0 r- i-sem y � �Lb� 584 �� ,4 D D CITY QF TIGARG 639 4171 ` e"W*, DATE -�-- --19 --- NUILDING PERMIT O6 �� fi/v `�� MAPZ,; ..t'1 LOTNOr�}S SUBDIVISION - �C 6940 Sw Sandbur g Rd. _ � YuuIiCULiunS S1*f� , �'< JGT3ADDRESS - OWNER—;_- -- EXP.DATE ___-- -- ;TATE REG.NO. BUILDER ._ - BUILDER'SPHONE _ -- - OTHER - - -- PHONE__.�- 3jk4*-V — ARCHITECT__ (] OTHER r DEMOLITION STRUCTURE ❑ NEW Cl REMODEL J] ADDITION Ll REPAIR Cj MOVE _ n_! COMM f EDUCATION �l IND f 1 RELIGIOUS LI ACCESSORY) ❑ GARAGE LI OTHER 1 FENCE l RESIDENCE _ LT�� HEAL"_ SLUG.TYPE S" FIRE LONE—PLAN CHECK BY _ OCCUPANCY LANDUSEtONE LI' ---, 6 exibtin �,,onstruct ad�sieiot>I to t� ,.0 �� rt n 9'1•:1',1 rruu ii•wu�rtd 1!ul�_S.,t1;�.in 'r L._.. -- SEWER PERMIT N VALUEi14. i U Fn tf. NO,BEDROOMS OCC.LOAD FLOOR LOAD •y��c HEIGHT `U,- NO STORIES AREA — �Sre REAR Pl"Ils LEFT SIDE RIGHT SIDE BUILDING DEPARTMENT — SETBACKS F_RON? s Permit �1b.UU THISPERM UIfJS AND DlL APPI CABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES,SUBJECT TO THE REGULATIONS IAND IT SHHEREBY AGREED THATE BUILDING CODE, THE D IN Plan Check 4ua•'oU WOR.c�WLILL BE DA E I CODES ANUN ACCORDANORDINANCECE WITH TH5. THE SSUANCEPLANS AND FOF THISIONS IAN PERMIT DOES NOTCOMPLWAIVE WITH PI.Ck.Fire �n!••1U __ RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS. CONTRACTOR AND SUB CONTRACTORS TO HAVE CURRENT CITY BUSINESS TAX PERMITS,SEPP RATE PERMIT?REQUIRED FOR SEWER,PLUUMBII GAN HEATING. State Tax SDC Total X41_ F1PPLICANT 9R AGENT PDCN Prepd. 153.)0 F��ONE • - Receipt No.. ADDRESS Bal.Due r 4 G•�l Issued By. Approved By _- ,...__.+.::_......m.._,..__..._.. _ ..... ..... ,... _- .. /.� 9'/ (o �TD,t�i►► r.�E'/a iii, ,�vC 9�Z/S'G / r-Trug-��sc�k. r _ DATE INSP, TYPE INSPECTION REMARKS iliPLUM ING DATE Zb h o 5 4A —_ Contractor °�e 119/86 910L !✓i0a- iC :,,. Permit No. — O/ Rough-in Future ry � Final j 6 HEATING 11 •J y,�, elm•/ Permit No. 4 tA Gas or011 L Rough-in / Final SEWER 2 �t ..t DRIVE Y -- �l�C/'/i✓ Final Storm Drainage ain Drain)Final10 --- Sidewalk — I Curb&Street Final rQ� �� -� % Approach IRT ICATE OCCUPANCY C R71F LATE OCCUPANCY Final 9 �`' Leo Landscaping !�/j-�7 4.f I `Cdst�{�t, w00- Zoning Final Z1u/1 ^'n'� ��`'�'� �° `..s"�.,+�„`—_q✓srx�rFo q r- T.ti,_ PDE el ro s �� }.`'Yt`4 pFl I p ..fill.k�d;t1{ it T iJN"ei , MI d 'F ti.W �! ' jtl.L rf,,1,, 9u l�Uj 1 yd 41k, 1m"n1 � pi lf'{��yG "1'iil uri l�:;lr Ir1 �4'dr�1' ��r�1rp I! llf.�r t 'rllf ,15 J�F�11�� T - ,!Il 'r:. r ;G I rr , Ir,l I'll 'N 11 ai ,• s FF i I v041 , d, H 6 �t's� lti, { rix `.�l Y gr, r11r'< <s d I 113: polt �.7 i a '� k rxll�r �fiP( 4 n ��Ir11Aar t�f�.�•i, I,r I t � . '�3 '•I, �r 1, o t ,r 9Ey r l u �, i1!• p II tt ap�� u , 4} �1' 1 b 1 , o k!, CITY TIGARD 639.4171 i:':•�,,_c.cions 5 8 9 3 BUILDING PERMIT DATE _19(10 TAX MAP Z,4L 1Lll LOT NOJ%Jl_ SUBDIVISION OWNER__.VS 1'uUlication3 JOB ADDRESS • 6960 SW Sandburg BUILDER _ STATE REG.NO. ______EXP.DATE BUILDER'S PHONE ARCHITECT ,.l.en•. ' to ---- PHONE -2l4`ySJU - -----OTHER _. ---------- STRUCTURE F❑ NEW ❑ REMODEL X�] ADDITION l REPAIR ❑ MOVE !_1 OTHER F) DEMOLITION ❑ RESIDFNCE _, ] COMM P EDUCATION I IND L7 RELIGIOUS ❑ACCESSORY f I GARAGE I ] OTHER FENCE OCCUPANCY �1_LAND USE ZONE Ll' BLDG.TYPE 5y FIRE ZONE PLAN CHECK BY LTM HE.A r �ilCLWULii vlll �; s j�tCVt+�i i1 Gtr : •`i tY C[]d[�1 YBuuirar•wn►'« 1nCL11�EA actin rin�Nr4t _ ,�,,]•�� rniti concrete workkuthur Li,un uldr;.), paving, landucupin';. Sec U11:i'. ptmdt #504 fur auditiuLi to btct:>. SEWER PERMIT R OCC.LOAD FLOOR LOAD HEIGHT NO STORIES AREA NO.BEDROOMS VALUE25-UUU BUILDING DEPARTMENT i SET BACKS FRONT _ REAR LEFT SIDE RIGHT SIDE Permit it).5U THIS PERMIT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN THE BUILDING CODE, ZONING 11U.b3 REGULATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE COD=S AND ONDINANCES, AND IT IS HEREBY AGREED THAT THE Plan Check WORK WILL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES. THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT WAIVE PI.Ck.Fire _ RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS. CONTRACTOR AND SUB CONTRACTORS TO HAVE CURRENT CITY BUSINESS TAX PERMITS.SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR SEWER,PL MRING AND HEATING. State Tax 6•b' SDO— 1k.RQ� .'.SU Total ?bf,.1 J` APPLICANT OR GENT ` Prepd. Bal.Due PDCNs Receipt No.;7 )/ ADDRESS ( PRONr Issued By Approved By DATE INSP. TYPE INSPECTION — REMARKS PLUMBING -�-DATE Contractor – Permit No. S Rough-in Fixture V Final — FiEATING Contractor Permit No. Gee ur 011 Rough-In — Final � ---- -- – —�— -- � SEWER Final DRIVEWAY Final Storm Drainage (Rain Drain)Final Sidewalk – Curb 6 Street Final Approach BLDG.DEPT.FINAL I CERTFICA EORARY NCY CERTIFICATE OCCUPANCY Final Landscaping Zoning Final �No, IMMM UK_ Mt PHUME EMU r e ii P.O. Box 127 • rUA'.A'IN, OREGON 97062 • PHONE 687-2601 P. F D. PUBL I CAT l OMS April 19e3? 6960 S. W. Sandberg Ln. Tioard, OR 972.2? 17C05- 2 254D -045-010 Insp. Type RAF Dear R. F D Publications, This is a Fire and Life Safety Plan Review and is based on the 1952 editions of the State of Oregon Structural Spe- cialty Code and Fire and Life Fafety Code (UBC ) , the State of Oregon Mechanical Specialty Code and Mechanical Fire and Life Safety Code (I!IiC ) , Uniform Fire Code (UFC ) , and other local ordinances and regulations. Fire retardant roof covering required doe to the projected roof area exceeding 6, 0(.')0 square feet. UBC 32C21(b ) Pro%,ide a fi,-e-resistive parapet UPC 1 09( :: : F ,rF.pet required as part of the 2-hour area separation wall. Provide a parapet with the 7a,-re degree of fire resistance as the wall upon which it is erected. The height of th� parapet shall not be less than 30 inches. UBC 1707(b ) High -piled storage of rolled paper (Special Hazard Coci -:jdi-- ty ) shall meet the following requirements of U,1i.forra Fire Code Article F1 : Srno4e rem,3,,ral capabilities shall be provided in the .:are- hovse. System shall be designed to provide sir air changes per hour at 100 parcent exhaust to the outside. the air-handling system fans shall be -ontrolled to shat down in accordance with the Uniform iechani.cal Cede or by activation of the fire--protection ;ysten. The system shall be designed for manual activation and override of automatic shutdown by separate control s-jitches from the power switches to the building lights and equip- ment. Control switches shall be in an approved location and clearly identified. I �D KIRIN ® TUfl �fl� lU �U 1 IN OREGON 17062 • PHONE 662-2601 P.O. BOX 127 • TUALAT The fan capacity shall be has ed on an empty building and there shell be a minir-.um of tA!n sj=paste f7ns located in different, locations of the ;,ane fila,- areas of the b+jil.d— ina Roof -✓ents anI draft curtains shall be installed Vent .area to floor area ratio is 1 : 30 for Special Hazard Com'+ddities. Vents shall consist of autor,atic roof vents or auto,-atic opening windows equipped with fusible lin' ( 165 deg. ) or roof monitors with a minimein opening of 24 inches or roof openings covered with appro.,-ed plastics that —ill melt and drop out at 165 deg. F. Graft curtains shall be provided to aid tt e opel-0, 00 of roof vents. Graft curtains shall be sheet petal , asbest.7s board, lath ;'•: plaster, gypsum +l ..t lboard or otha,• approved equivalent material . Curtains shall be at least 6 feet in depth For F-:F,2cia1. Hazard Commodities, jraft curi:ains shall divide 1hF, unaer-- roof area into sections not e> ceeding 6, 005 square feet. Aisles of not less than 4; inches in width stall he pro- vided. Submit to this office for at least three sets of automatic sprinkler protraction plans. Exit doors shall be openable from tt inside without the use of a We'd or any special kno,aledge or fort- Manually operated edge or surface mounted flus bolts and Eurface bolts are prohibited. 'Jac i'. �, � lUfl �flllfl �U �fl � HUP.O. BOX 127 • TUALA7iN, uREGON 17062 • PHONE612_2601 Not less than one ( I ) appT—oved f ire eztiriguisheT' i,1ith rating of not less thin 4--A shall be pro—ided for each 4, CC•D square feet of floor ar?a or fra'_tinn thereof The travel distance to an fAngvi.sher from any portion of the building sh.31 not; eiceed 75 f,aet. Ui-f '3tand_ard 10-1 Submitted plans are not approved f c r ronstructia,i. Plan uitist be 1•rt!•. i;ed and resubmitted for- review and irdic '-:4tE, co1np1i-Ir,ce tilith the above noted 1tv,�!s If you rl?sire a Coil;erenrn regarding this, plan TSVI' -,J Or Sf you have question-', ple•asE' reel free to con Fact :7f at• ( 503) S':iTI cerely, Mal a rie ra _ l.illi Fire Prevention 113'ureav i i t1FG6V OCCUPAN( F fl.F. L1,5T APR 3, 1V06 ST: 48: 4, TUALAT IN FIRE DISTRICT 1. i'r+90 1 KEY SCM11 N 1. Name R r-. 1). PUBLICATIUN`:, 2. Zone--C)cc 0: 2E,4 ) --045--000 5. Special Sorti . 3. Address 61760 SW SANLl13t'RG 1 114 l .t 6. Special. 9ort2: 4 . :ttegory 7. Special Surt:3: ;ensue; Tract: '307 flan�aner Jim 1n.illips 17 C.ode Edition: NONE 3 P h un a (50J,. 629-96C±:' 1 E?, Bldg Val++e 1;1, 1130. 000 4 11,j 11. - Ap t##. 117. ContC•r,`6 Va'1 : 45, 1,500, 000 Addre3s 69,�,r) S. W. Sandbur11 _'r1 Other Value $0 y. ;t :.p: 71Qa_r•d, Uf, c,;', ,' ,?1.. iSO CIOS5 3 i w,r,rr Rfr. D Pe+h17C 31': L '� i ; 4_G_. UL3C IJf.r: 1/ Ft 2, 44213�.'. + anu ( 50,J i �aL() 71. E 1. Fire, Alrm Sq : AD'P ", Suitp-<,}t AI-aT'W �it1�,i: li: 1a'6 10. 4.d dress 690() S. W. ;i.atMbvr y L+7 215 Prop in Use Y I t 09/0315?' " i � 3 � , 1=' Emra Contct ';`. Date Rvftiodol : 08/27/86 1:3. E.merp Fhone: Gt-OUr+d A,•r a 111,71 5,10 14 Ins Type/flo INF f OJ 15. 901 Occ Ut F•: 57 Newspaper, man printint! pu V*I F!F F 11-0-I T E u T I O m 1. Alarm Shutoff Lco-: T 114E 2 Power 5hutaff Lc : -i 1 .E 3. Water Shul.off Lc,.-. � : .. � ~ r; r•I 4. Natural G.Ts Shutoff Locati !-n 5 FAC Location N;.: nY 1,14 trent door 6 Sprinkler Control Lo!'aI"i.wi Stant` ripe Lucation E?. Attic Access Location i•.!:_IiJi'_ c Special Hazard TUpe 10 Sp ec i,41 Hazzard TUp i`!i1NI•. 11 Special Hat.ard 12 Water Source Locati,^n HYDR,•aNr'-•Fvt: :ai-, entrance 1:3. Stairway/`pert `;haft; Prot Y/N: I. +:airs• crnclo ed ! #k vert shaft - 0 c1'tMiSTRUCTION .1*3CRrt:N 1. Car„ T+jpe 50 V--N 16 N Prop I.inrr 45 / 10 PROPFIR TY LINE: 2. 1. : 4,.,aII h'rot 00 NO WALL PROTF�.CTION 3. Lia;mt 4r:'a 5, 0CIO l8 S Prop I. i.n18 /10 PROPF-PTY LINE 4. Total Ara_, 44, 282 1'? IJaI l Pro+• 10 1 HR WALL OPENINGS vERmITTI 5 # Str_.r i a ; ? G E Prop I.i ne 99 /10 PROPERTY LINE 6. Height-ft 15 21. Wall. F,r•ot. 00 1,40 WALL PROTECTION 7. Inter Colmr+: 10 LT WD F-R 22. W Prop 1-ine 10 /10 PROPERTY LINE_' S. Roof Const 11 WD TRUSEt 23. Wall Prot 10 1 HR MALL OPENINGS PERMITTF" 9. Roof Cover 04 ORD UNKNU 24 Area Wal : 2 H11. 10, Rrof Area 37, 520 25. Area Wal ii . UBC O�c=%ft: / I-"6. Area Wal : 121. t'BC OcC3 t / ,'.7. flan Luc : 204. 1 13. UBC tJcc4l -t, / 28. Misc : High piled stge - rolled paper 14. Avto SP Use: 20 AREA INCREAS 15 Auto FA Use: a.r ,.. ..,.,.,« e1i�rlYlvwwtYAWhWMwr.W+•1,wrw+w..x.w+.w«..«......,._......,......»..,...�.....«w...w...r,...«.....,,......rr.w>•1..w,«ar.trn.ewl�•. DL CITYOF TIGAAD os9.4171 ��—l� j -- RUILDING '.JEAMIT DATE _19_L ��•j/��_ �y TAX MAP 2 %/ /rt6T NO. SUBDIVISION JOB ADDRESS W—. �_ ��_W��!_��L�----- BUILDER STATE NEG.NO. —EXP DATE BUILDER'S PHONE ARCHITECT � � . (� 1 PHONE G G]_o OTHER STRUCTURE EJ NEW ❑ REMODEL Ak.DDITION _ I.1 REPAIR G MOVE1J OTHER f 1 DEMOLITION Ll RESIDENCE COM►, 1 1 EDUCA ON 1-1 IND Cl RELIGIOUS O ACCESSORY, [.1 GARAGE U OTHER I 1 FENCE OCCUPANCY _ LAND IJSE ZONE BLDG.TYPE _� FIRE ZONE "'!•• PLAN CHECKT BY ��HEA - - -- -� — A ,�-- e - - SEVIER PERMIT N �. OCC.LOAD FLOOR LOAD HEIGHT NO.STORIES AREA NO.BEDROOMS — VALU5Aft7,O4)O BUILDING DEPARTMENT_ nc --- � SET BACKS FRONT na LEFT SIDE RIGHT SIDE Permit O/ SO THIS PERMIT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TC-fHE P 11U�LATiONS CONTAINED IN THE BUILDING CODE ZONING 1 REGULATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE CODE 4D O►tDINANCES,AND IT IS HEREBY AGREED THAT THE Plan Check WORK WILL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES. THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT WAIVE PI.Ck.FIre _ RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS. CONTRACTOR AND SUB CONTRACTORS TO HAVE CURRENT CITY BUSINESS TAX PERMITS.SEPARATE PERMITS REOUIRED FOR SEWER,PLUMBING AND HEATING. Stale tax rL SDC— ll APPLICANT-OR A(dENT ►-repd. PDCN -- ��—— Bel.Du - Receipt No. ADDRESS �� _ ------ --- - -- --_ - PHnNF _ ++ed @y__ Approved By--- _ 0� Qk�40) /4' NJ Le I f � CITY OF TIGARD BUILDING DEPARTMENT PLAN CHECK NO. : rr _ PLAN CHECK APPLICATION DATE RECEIVED:�J P/C DEPOSIT PAID: This is to certify that the attached _ sets of plans have been submitted for plan check pursuant to the Oregon Structural_C de and Fire & Life Safety Code, edition. PROPERTY OWNER: I/ P��M7d�`� OWNER'S ADDRESS: r/ `J G d G�/"—pA TELEPHONE: JOB ADDRESS: _ V LOT NO. & MAP: DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Afro s Required SPECIAL NOTES WPannigg Dept. 0 Reissue .ngineering Dept . 0 Flood Plain/Sensitive Lands OFire District O Sewer AvaiInbility O Other 0 Other Items Required OList of. subcontractors V Business Tax 0 Calculations OTruss Details O Parking Plan OLandscape Plan 0 Other COMMENTS: "t7 ' Y _ N 'S�oC1Y�� r'�___�.tf City of Tigard Building Department molt BY: r CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 8--85 VARIANCE V 13-85 APPLICATION. Request by RFD Publications Inc. for Site Development Review and Variance approval to allow for a 19,670 square foot building addition and the provision of 16% of the lot area for landscaping instead of 25% and to eliminate a landscaped buffer as required by City Code an property zoned I-P (Industrial Park) and located at 6960 SW Sandburg Street (WCT"1 251 IDD, lot 701) . DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has w?PROVED the above described applications subject to certain conditions . The findings and conclusions on which the Director based his decision are as ,,oted Below, A. F.TNDING OF FACT 1 . Background The M-2 (Heavy Industrial) zone applied to the subject property from 1977 until November, 1983 when the designation was changed to C-P (Commercial Drofessional) , Because this zone designation transformed the use of this and other properties into non-conforming uses, a small area including the subject property was rezoned to I-P (Industrial Park) . 2 . Vicinity Information Other light industrial uses that are zoned I.--P He to the north and east. The C--P (Commercial Professional) zone abuts the property on the south and west. The land an the west side is developed with an office building and parking lot. The property to the southwest and south is undeveloped. 3 . Site Information and Proposal Description A printing operation including a 22,970 square foot office/warehouse building, parking lot, and loading area occupy the property . The applicant. proposes to build a 19,679 square foot addition on the south side (if the existing structure. The loading area will be. shifted to the east and a vacant portion of the property will be utilized for additional parking. (is a part of the expansion, the applicant is requesting a variance to allow a landscaped area of 16% rather- than 25% requirement of the I-P zone and for a zero foot setback along the southern property line where a 10 foot wide landscaped buffer is required . NOTICE Of DECISION - SDR B-85 & V 13--85 - PAGE 1 4. Agency and NPO Comments The Engineering Division notes that storm water runoff should be controlled so that erosion of the bank to the south will not be a problem for this abutting property owner. The Building Inspection Division has no objection to the proposal. The Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District indicates that all portions of the building must be within 150 feet of any approved access roadway or an automatic sprinkler system shall be necessary . H. ANALYSIS ADO CONCLUSION Except, for the variance r•equesEs which a,re discussed below, the proposed building expansion and redevelopment of the property in consistent with the Community Development Code requirements for the I:--P zone. The only two items worthy of further discussion are noted below. Parking The present operation comfortably excoods the City' s parking standards. The 20 additional spaces required for this expansion will be accommodated by the existing spaces and the 1.2 additional spares that are proposed. Landscaping The landscaping on the property meets City standards . However, a landscaping plan must be submitted for the areas adjacent to the south and west property lines. The Code contains the following five criteria which must be satisfied in order to justify the approval of a variance. I., The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this Code, be in conflict with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan, to any other applicable policies and standards; and to other properties in the same zoning dist►-;ct or vicinity; 2. There ar-e special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances which the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; 3 . The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this Code and City standard:s will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible, while permitting some economic use of the l.*nd; 4. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic , drainage, dramatic: land forms or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were located as specified in the CodL,; and NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 8--95 6 V 13--85 — PAGE 2 5. The hardship is not aelf--i.mposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. The request to devote 16% of the lot area to landscaping instead of the Vi% area required by the Code appears to be justified for the following reasons: 1. The prim«ry intent of this landscpaping requirement is to ensura an appropriate amount of buffering for surrounding uses. This is particularly important when residences are adjacent to an I--P zone. This property is adjacent to commercial and industrial development and the existing landscaping on the site is of high quality . The existing landscaping along with the additional work that will be required as a condition of Site Development Review will provide adequate buffering for the surrounding properties. 2 . The previous M-2 zone had no landscaping requirements and the C-P zone which followed requires that only 15% of the lot be landscaped. The existing building was constructed and future plans were based upon the provisions of the M-2 zone. The application of the 25% landscaping requirement essentially prohibits any meaningful expansion of the printing operation. 3 . The proposer) use is consistent with code requirements and the reduction in landscaped area will not have an adverse effect upon physical or natural. systems . A. The hardship was imposed through the City' s change in zoning requirements after the property was developed. The variance is the minimum necessary to allow for the required expansion of the facility . The proposed landscaping is also consistent with the requirement for the adjoining C--P zone. (15% minimum) . The landscaping chapter of the Community Development Code (18 . 100) requires that a 10 foot wide landscaped buffer be provided where a development in the I-P zone is adjacent to the C-P zone. The proposed 0 foot building setback on the southern property line does not appear to meet the applicable criteria based upon the findings below: 1 . The purpose of the landscaped buffer is to provide some physical separation between different land use types . The proposed addition would be situated at the top of a hill with an undeveloped parcel zoned C- P lying below. This building could be a rather imposing structure when viewed from below. The 10 foot setback and landscaping requirement will have a definite positive visual impact and will help maintain a compatible relationship between properties. 2 . The previous M--2 zone had a 20 foot rear and side yard setback requirement . The C--P zone had no setback requirement but the expansion would not have been permitted because the publishing firm' s non-conforming status in that zone. The 10-foot setback standard actually allows for a more efficient use of the property than originally permitted under the M-2 zone. NOTICE OF DFCISION - SDR 8--85 6 V 1.3-85 -- PAGE 3 I . The proposed use, conforms with code requirements and impacts related to physical or natural systems is not relevant, 4. The applicant: has not demonstrated that the setback variance is the only feasible way to expand the operation. Since t:he original setback standards have been relaxed, the need for the variance appears to be self—imposed if the existi,ig building is not in the ideal location for constructing an addition. C. DECISION The Planning Director approves SDR 8 -811 subject to the following conditions: 1.. UNLESR OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL. 81. MET PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. 2. A revised site and landscaping plan shall be submitted for Planning Director approval which contains the following items : a. A minimum setback of 1.0 feet shall be provided along the south and west property lines . b. Location, dimensions and planting materials for all new landscaped areas including the required buffer strip along the south and west property lines . Total landscaped area shall equal a minimum of 15% of the lot area. 3 . The method for handling stormwater drainage shall ba submitted to the Building Inspector for approval . 4. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date noted below. The Planning Director partially approves V 13-81 subject to the following conditions: 1 . The total landscaped area on the property shall be a minimum of 1.5%. 2. The proposed addition shall maintain a minimum setback of 10 feet from the south and west property lines . 3 . The approval is valid if exercised within one year of the decision date noted below. NOTICE OF DECISION — SDR 8--85 6 V i3-85 - PAGE 4 D. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, pasted at City _ Hall and mailed to: _X _ _ The applicant & owners X _ Owners of record within the required distance X The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization X Affected governmental agencies 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON JU1y 29, 1985 � UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3 . flRgeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 13.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 4:30 P, o1/ � 4. Questions: If you have any questions, please cal the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 972.23, 639-4171— WfIlfAm A. Monahan, Director of Community Development DATE APPROVED *, rimI I RP-Nit -. CC L....... Sf (KSl_: 1627P) NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 8- 05 & V 13--85 PAGE 5 NIIIIII International Conference of Building Officials 5360 SOUTH WORKMAN N1111 Rob\D WIilMf i (1 liA� _IJO IT g� 31 699-0541 y R, Aur 7 J4q.� BOARD OF DIRECTORS ] A h OFFICES OF VE PRESIDENT August 5, 198 ALAi1�T I iIC'UETS,E.F&HR,P.E.RJOHN E.MAULDING,P.E. " t�l1i_A1 N HNIGL DIRECTOR BUILDING OFFICIAL GRE00�,,, ALU R.WATSON,P.E. LANCASTER,CALIFORNIA FIRST VICE-PRESIDENT Gene Birchill DAVID A.BASSETT,PE. Building Official BUILDING SAFETY DIRECTOR g MEDFORD.OREGON Tualatin Rural Fire Prote2tion District SECOND VICE-PRESIDENT Post Office Box 127 MARK A.RODMAN Tualatin, Oregon 97062 DIRECTOR,BUILDING SERVICES SPRINGFIELD,ILLINOIS IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT SUBJECT: Section 3306 (n), Exterior Stairway Construction, JACK S.ATKINS,RE. 1982 Uniform Building Code BUILDING OFFICIAU DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR PLACERVILLE.CALIFORNIA Dear Mr. Birchill: CHARLES CLAWSON \ DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY Thisis in response to your letter, dated July 8, 1985, regarding DEVELOPMENT ARLINGTON,TEXAS exit stairways located in areas where protection of openings \1 PHILLIP M.HERRINGTON is required, and the intent of the subject code section in restricting l DIRECTOR,DEPARTMENT OF exterior stairways from being located'in such areas. BUILDING AND SAFETY o_�.--------- RENO.NEVADA SOL J.JACOBS,RE. We agree with your interpretation of the intent of the requirements, DIRECTOR OF INSPECTIONS i.e., to provide protection to those persons needing to use the MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA stairway from exposure to fire and to reduce the spread of WILLIAM J.JUSTEN,P.E. DIRECTOR,DEPARTMENT OF fire from one adjacent property to another. Your solution CON STRUCTION AND LAND USE in rovidin a fire-resistive wall with a fire ratin as re uired SEATTLE.,WASHINGTONp g - g q by Table No. 5-A, located between the stairway and the adjacent DONALD T.MecRAE,P.E. ;TATFBUILDING COMMISSIONER property line constructed tc the width limit-, as described in STATE ANA OFNDIANA NDIA your letter fulfills the intent of the code. We would suggest INDIANAPOLIS.INDIANA J MICHAFLANOLTE a height of wall above the stair tread nosing of at least 6 feet !'MPFRNTENDENT OF BUILDING 6 inches similar to the requirements for headroom clearance INSPECTION EUGENE,OREGON in an enclosed stairway. WILLIAM E.SCHLECHT MANAGER.BUILDING.PLANNNC 1 hope this response provides sufficient information to your AND ZONING DIVISION VANCOUVER,WASHINGTON request., but should you have any additional questions, please JAMES A.SINGLETON do not hesitate to contact us. BUILDING SAFET'ADMNISTRATOR TUCSON.ARIZONA Sincerely, RONALD R.TREMBLAY CHIEF BUILDING AND 7ON44G INSPECTOR SAL INA,KANSAS CHARLES W.VOLZ A.I.A. I \ f N CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL Rick Okawa, P.E. DIVISION OFCO:ICADMINISTRATION Staff En ineer/Codes ALBUOUEROUE.NEW MEXICO g CHIgtANLEY WHEELER HUIIDING NSPECTOR 110/cb LIVERMORE.CALIFORNIA EUGENE J.TELLER,P.E. SUPF R RITENDENT.BUILDING AND SAFETY LONG BEACH,CALIFORNIA Regional Offices: 67.38 N.W. lower Dove • KansaN( 11T,MIssUUrl 641 i 1 • !H 161 41-2-141 601 W(,M I ith StHrl,Suily 1-f • Austin.Tv%^7H%111 o 112 1 479.11 I'M 12 101 Hvilevite-Re<Imnnd Romf, Strite!TIN 0 NPllevoc,W,Tshinglon 9H1N1 i 1 (206)4",1•91,41 i MACKENZIE/SAI 10 & ASSOCIATES, P.C., OREGON MA.CKENZIE/SAITO&ASSOCIATES, P.S., WASHINGTON ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS 0690 SW BANCROFT STREET PORTLAND, OREGON 97201 (503) 224-9570 Q M Lr 4ugust 5, 1.985 AUC 71885 Tualatin Fire District Attention: Gene Birchill 1��ALMJN FINL t _;, CAT P.O. Box 127 JUALATIN, ORL601Y Tualatin, Oregon 97062 Dear Gene: RE: Addition to RFD Publishing, 72nd & Sandberg Road, Tigard, Oregon Project Number 284021 This letter is to confirm our August 16, 1985 discussion of the building addition to RFD Publishing. The following items were noted: 1. Existing structure is type V41, fully sprinklered, B-2 occupancy, with separation on two sides, with a minimum distance of 45' . The existing warehouse occupies approximately 16, 150 sq. ft,. , and the two story attached office occupies an additional 13,140 sq. ft. , for a combined existing square footage of 29,580 sq. ft. 2. Owner is requesting an ad•fition of 2,408 sq. ft. , fully sprinklered, storage area as an extension of the existing warehouse, with Lhe possibility of a second floor being added in the future. 3. The owner 1s also requesting an 11,600 sq. ft. , fully sprinklered warehouse addition immediately to the south of the existing warehouse. 4. It was confirmed that the 11,600 sq. ft. warehouse addition would be separated from the existing building with a two hour separation wall. All existing openings would be retrofitted with automatic closures pet two hour requirements. 5. The 2,408 sq. ft. storage area would be allowed without separation from the existing structure, provided that an approved central station be installed on the sprinkler system. If there are additional comments that. should be added to or deleted from ttese notes, please inform us as soon as possible. Thank you for your time and service. S' cerel ne Mil ren, AIA G eg Enclosure cc: Ben Staton Greg Hranac , CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 8--85 VARIANCE V 13-85 and APPLICATION: Request by RFD Publications Inc . for Site Development tionReview the Variance approval to allow for a ea for square foot building d of 25% and to provision of 16% of the lot area fur LandsCcaPl Code on property zoned T-P eliminate a landscaped buffer as required by y Street (WC TM 2S1 IDD, lot (Industrial Park.) and located at 6960 SW Sandburg 7U1) . is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of DECISION: Notice Tigard has APPROVED the above described applications which t subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the Director based his decision are as noted below. A. FINDING OF FACT 1 . Background The M-2 (Heavy Industrial) zone applied to the subject property from 1971 until November, 1983 when the tees this zone wasdchanged to changedto (Commercial Professional) . ro erties into transformed the use of this and other subject property non-conforming uses, a small area including was rezoned to I-P (Indust:rial Park) . 2, Vicinity Information useg ie Other light industrial Commertc al hat are zoned I p lt� north Professional) zoneabuts the and east. The C--P property on the south and west. and parkinq lot land on the wThe property developed with an office building to the southwest and south is undeveloped. 3 . Site Information and Proposal Description A printing operation including a 22,970 square foot office/warehouse building, parking lot, and loading area occupy the property . The applicant proposes to build a 19,679 square foot addition on the south side of the existing structure.e. The loading area will be shifted to the east and a vacant portion the property will be utilized for additional parking, As a part. of the expansion, the applicant is requesting a variance of 1 t ement of to allow a land^capa afoot rather than alongrequheir southern the 1--p zone and forazera property line where a 10 foot wide landscaped buffer is required . NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 8-85 & V 13-85 - PAGE 1 VW 4ry m. 4• Agency and NPO Comments The Engineering Division notes that storm water runoff should be controlled so that erosion of the bank to the south will not be a problem for this abutting proporty owner. The Building Inspection Division has no objection to the proposal. T•h^ Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District indicates that all portions of the building must: be within 154 feNt of any approved access roadway or an automatic sprinkler system shall be necessary . B• ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION Except for the variance requesfs which are discussed below, the proposed building expansion and redevelopment of the property is consistent with the Community Development Code requirements for the 1--P zone. The only two items worthy of further discussion are noted below. Parking The present operation comfortably exceeds the City ' s parking standards. The 20 additional spaces required for this expangi.on will be accommodated by the existing spaces and the 12 additional spaces that are proposed. Landscaping the landscaping on the proper-t. 2meets City standards , however, a plan st landscaping mube submitted for• the areas adjacent to the south and west property lines. The Code contains the following five criteria which must be satisfied in order to justify the approval of a variance. 1 • The proposed variance will. not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this Code, be in conflict: with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan, to any other applicable policies and standards; and to other prop?rties in the same zoning district or vicinity; I 2. There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances which the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; 3 . The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this Code and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible, while permitting some economic use of the land; 4 . Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms or, parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development. were located as specified in the Code; and NOTICE OF DECISION -- SDR 8--85 6 V 13-85 -- PAGE 2 5. The hardship is not self-imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. The request to devote 16% of the lot area to landscaping instead of the 25% area required by the Code appears to be justified for the following reasons: 1. The primary intent of this lanciscpaping requirement is to ensure an appropriate amount of buffering for surrounding uses . This is particularly important when residences are adjacent to an I-P zone, This property is adjacent to commercial and industrial development and the existing landscaping on the site is of high quality. The existing landscaping along with the additional work that will be required as a condition of Site Development Review will provide adoquate buffering for the surrounding properties. 2. The previous M-2 zone had no landscaping requirements and the C-P zone which followed requires that only 15% of the lot be landscaped. T'he existing building was constructed and future plans were based upon the provision? of the M-2 zone. The application of the 25% landscaping requirement essentially prohibits any meaningful expansion of the printing operation. 3 . The proposed use is consistent with code requirements and the reduction in landscaped area will not have an adverse effect upon physical or natural. systems. 4 . The hardship was imposed through the City' s change in zoning requirements after the property was developed. The variance is the minimum necessary to allow for the required expansion of the facility . The proposed landscaping is also consistent with the requirement for the adjoining C-P zone. (15% minimum) . The landscapi,ig chapter of the Community Development Code (18. 100) requires that a 10 foot wide landscaped buffer be provided where a development. in the I-P zone is adjacent to the C-P zone. The proposed 0 foot building setback on the southern property line does not appear to meet the applicable critcria based upon the findings below: 1 . The purpose of the landscaped buffer is to provide some physical separation between different land use types , The proposed addition would be situated at the top of a hill with an undeveloped parcel. zoned C-P lying below. This building could be a rather imposing structure when viewed from below. The 10 foot setback and landscaping requirement will have a definite positiva visual impact and will help maintain a compatible relationship between properties. 2. The previous M-2 zone had a 20 foot rear and side yard setback requirement. The C--P zoie had no setback requirement but the expansion would not have been permitted because the publishing firm' s non-conforming status in that zone. The setback standard actually allows for at more efficient use of the property than originally permitted under the M--2 -one . NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 8-85 & V 13--85 PAGE 3 , 3 . -(he proposed use conforms with code requirements and impacts related to physical or natural systems is not relevant. 4. The applicant has not demonstrated that the setback variance is the only feasible way to expand the operation. Since the original setback standards have been relaxed, the need for the variance appears to be self--imposed if the existing building is not in the ideal location for constructing are addition. C. DECISION The Planning Director approves SDR 8-85 subject to the following conditions: 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE METPRIOR 1'0 ISSUANCE 01 BUILDING PERMITS. 2. A revised site and landscaping plat, shall be submitted for Planning Director approval which contains the Following items: a. A minimum setback of 10 feet shall be provided along the south and west property lines. b. Location, dimensions and planting materials for all new landscaped areas including the required buffer strip along the south and west property lines . Total landscaped a �a shall equal. a minimum of 15% of the lot area. 3 . The method for handling stornewater drainage shall, be submitted to the Building Inspector for approval . 4. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the final decision date noted below. The Planning Director partially approves V 13-85 subject to the following conditions: 1 . The total landscaped area on the property shall be a minimum of 15%. 2. The proposed additiot, shall maintain a minimum setback of 10 feet from the south and west property lines. 3 . The approval is valid if exercised within one year of the decision date noted below. NOTICT' Of DECISION - SDR 8. 85 6 V 13-95 PAGE 4 'W W R 0. PROCEDURE 1. Noti_ca: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant & owners _ X Owners of record within the required distance X The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization X Affected governmental agencies 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL. BE FINAL- ON July 29, 1985 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3 . Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after notice is given and sent . The deadline for filing of an appeal is 4 :30 P.M�7 4, Questions: If you have any quest;jns, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 9722.3, 639-•4171 . wf'iii%m A. Monahan, Director of Community Development DATE APPROVED II I rim alk"t I � L ` 77- (KSt. : 167 NOTICE. OF DECISION - SDR 0- 95 & V 13--85 - PAGE 5 .. ..... ,_ -.: .. -. ..,...�«....,m.....wM..w.a...,.........,_,._.w.........,.w.«....�.,r.+...rw.+vuewrAlY.. SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION COF TI GA R D Date �' % 19 No.— 0 9 4 The applicant hereby applies for a permit for the work indicated or as shown in the accompanying plans and specifications. SiCN LOCATION ADDRESS: �) 76 0 25. e,y, C APPLICANT: Owner "ssee Authorized Representative NAME!COMPANY y � '•�9�'�'�_^g. " /lk . Tel. � 3� r PROPOSED SIGN: Freestanding Wall ^ �Proje,ting ____._____Other SIGN DIMENSIONS 3 ` S AREA ��``2_ 'c HE GHT - � WALL AREA PROPERTY FRONTAGE IV/2COST ZONING DISTRICT 1�2L'.LLUi41NATION MATERIAL _ 'lu -G.�c"h^ i�U�Jy/> COLOR COPY -'c4it�ruttin�fjR # cU�tttiv0�f2 ._. _DRB EXISTING SIGNS: Freestanding— L Nall Projecting Other COMMENTS: �. All sign permits must be accompanied by a scale drawing and plot plan. If work authorized under a sign permit has not been completed within ninety days after the issuance of the permit, the permit shall PLANNING DEPARTMENT Deco �ny�ll and i Permit Fee Approved pp cant's S�q ure Renewal Date _ Address Telenhone I V e kV AJ -.. �► +w *�w q. ++� w gar SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION COF TIGARD Dam *'uY , 1s� No. _0 The applicant hereby applios for a F,ermit for the Wdrk indioasm!or n shown in the accompanying plans and specifications. SIGN LOCATION ADDRESS: 6Q60 ;Cd oandl-mr« APPLICANT: Owngt_ r_ Lessee Authorized Representative NAME/COMPANY Tel. PROPOSED SIGN: Freestanding Wall _ Projecting _Other — SIGN DIMENSIONS AREA — HEIGHT WALL AREA PROPER'T'Y FRONTAGE ._ _ COST _ ZONING DISTRICT _ILLUMINATION _ j MATERIAL COLOR --- COPY _DRB EXISTING SIGNS: Freestanding Wall _ Projecting __ Other _ COMMENTS: — All sign permits most La accompanied by a scale drawing and.3lot plan. If work authorized under A sign permit has not been co npleted --- within ninety days after the issuenra of the permit, the parr dt shall PLANNING DEPARTMENT become null and void. Permit Fee I Approved 7-4— Applicant's Signature .r Receipt No. Renewal Date �__ Address Telephora dME N 0 April 20, 1981 Customer: RFD Publications Project: Sandblasued Identification Sign �i-- -�D(DWnTQWnER Size: Approy, 36"x70" Colors : Brown, Orange per logo Material : A .Clear cedar glue-lam beam,4" thick B .Clear cedar panels , 2" thickness Delivery: A. 3 weeks B. 22 weeks Price: A . 725 .00 B . 665 .00 hank pug P.O. BOX 23601 / TIGARD,ORE. 972.2.3 / 620 - 2610 T ^�slF ^F'"..rs-^a.a5y.,.•ee:x'w:e:,:v,:•xcw.enwe ' "'�""s^-a_'c----_—_.__._ -.._.-- •-- rsves�sctsrcrn^ �::., s OF OC, • l CITY OF TIGARD NCy C 33 OREGON c.. �y a, Owner:.....Clarke...Puulishin9 Co. ____... ........ ....Permit No......0008.......... •;�( r - 6960 S W Sandbur Street Building Address.................................... .......... .9..................................................... yg - y . ........... . v , ... Certificate is hereby given this....24th da of_ , Octo.ber lg... that said building may be occupied and y that it conv lies with all requirements of {, the Building; Cede for the City of Tigard, Tigard Cit Council. a �.s approved by .he f g ar d y >•,: i Building inspector City ,of T ; Bard INSPECTION REE U EST for INSPECTION ,E : P'ER'MIT N':.' — ` AT E; :AL3 ATF j SS J E A:._.d O'NNERS 4L, ADDRE033 : �9Gt� CflN7RaCT0R : TEST' Air Co , Ai-:ter Visual 7, , Laboratory RE3lJLT: ;ppr;v3t� , :..3 r0Vad :1 ?e S:tETCH: r /r I Ori DATE ch vjpr;amenlcl !oil d ita here'l � , A 9!3 , . AUURESS _- 112_ � r PERMIT N0. PFRMIT CHARGE CONNECTION FEE PAID 13Y TYPE OF BUILDING _ _ _ _ DATE CONNFUL01 SERVICE RATE I N S I�E C T I 0 N FEF ' - UONTRACTOR4L PAID 13Y _-- UATC _ SIZE OF CONNECTION `_��" _ A55FS'3flENT -. PAID -- City of Tigard INSPECTION REQUEST for L.cs A L T" INSPECTION TIME: _�_FPERMIT NO. : DATE: A' DATE ISSUED :._Ll_ OWNERS NAME : _ v LAV-- j 1B L iflL- ADDRESS: - ��=y �?13 v��'`CONTRACTOR : TEST : Air O, Woter'] , Visualx/,, L:boratory p RESULT: Approved D Disepprovaw r , Pendingy SKETCH. Adr .SfJ1G��ta,.fsv'T � P�C 77o�d " ►T I-i*o lk/ T r 1-s p- m) i1e o -e a wl- P/r1d740j-$ . e0l,.9R� �j� Aap, +4 iGL S ip /C 71 -- A-)&-k, TLS k-AP 4* p��iNe�r 7 Y T X0ARB#S4t ,P 1 S�t'f'�-o Nom' • INSPECTOR DATE CNO?F : Attach supplementol teff data berets] � 1wl sss � { i City of Tigard INSPECTION REQUEST for INSPECTION TIME: PERMIT NO. :— DAT E: O. :DATE: DATE ISSUED :--L-Z-- OWNERS SSUED :._LLOWNERS NAME : fgf k RLd/-- �514 //E/v- - ADDRESS: CONTRACTOR : _ L.� �� .5 4 TEST : Air ❑, Water[I Visual, Laboratory ❑ RESULT: Approved Disapproved ❑ Pending U SKETCH. 16 i !NSPECTOR DATE FOT$ : Attach supplemental test data beret] I I I f Tigard city o INSPECTION REQUEST � for — INSPECTION TIME : PERMIT NO.: --� —' DATE ISSUED:._-1.- DATE: y OWNERS NAME : ADDRESS : CONTRACTOR :-- - � TEST' Air ❑, . Water [01 , Visual Laboratory ❑ '� Disapproved ❑ , Pendlny LlRESULT: Approved , SKETCH: le)36) I l INSPECTOR DATE COTE: Attach supplemental t&et data heret] City of Tigard INSPECTION REQUEST for INSPECTION TIME: C�- E'� PERMIT NO. :-- DATE: CS. :DATE: 2e)Zl��7 DATE ISSUED :---L-I-. f� � f�i'l�L1SNiNCr �.C• OWNERS NAME - - -- A DDRE S S: CONTRACTOR TEST . Air F Waterr3 , VisualK Laboratory O RESULT: Approved W , Disapproved ❑ Pending [] SKETCH: , INSPECTOR DATE Em 079' Attach SUPO "ental test dote Yeret0i City of Tigard NSPEGTION REQUEST for INSPECTION TIME: PERMIT NO. : — DATE. _ 7 DATE ISSUED -. I Z OWNERS PJAME : 1 A- -..Ai-1t-31/ std/0("(;-- ADDRESS: 4g; 940--- '& J CONTRACTOR : ��'/'�/✓ k'��.5i Fi7 TEST : Ai , Water[I , visual O , Laboratory ❑ RESULT: Approved X , Disapproved O , PendingE] SKETCH. � c j / 10 INSPECTOR ATE [NOTE: Attach supplemental test data bard] r i PROCEDURE FOR CONDUCTING ACCEPTANCE TEST 1, Clean pipe to be tested by propelling snug fitting inflated rubber ball through the pipe with water. 2. Plug all pipe outlets with suitable test plugs. Brace each plug securely. 3. If the pipe to be tested is submerged in ground water, insert a pipe probe, by boring or jetting, into the backfill material adjacent to the center of the pipe, and determine the pressure in the probe when air passes slowly through it. This is the back pressure due to ground water submerged.,: over the end of the probe. All gauge pressures In the test should be increc.sed by this amount. <<. Add air slowly to the portion of the pipe installation under test un 11 the internal air pressure is raised to 4.0 prig. 5. Check exposed pipe and plugs .for abnormal leakage by coating with a soap solution. If any failures are observed, bleed off air and make necessary repairs. 0. After art internal pressure of 4.0 psig is obtained, allow at least two minutes for air temperature to stabilize, adding only the amount: of air required to maintain pressure. After the two minute period, disconnect air supply. ;. When pressure decreases to 3.5 psig, start stopwatch. Determine the time in seconds that is required for the internal air pressure to reach 2.5 psig. This time interval. should then be compared with the time required in seconds as computed on reverse side of sheet. 9. List siz,? and length of all porLions of pipe under test in table similar to u.te shown on reverse side of sheet. 10. By use of nomograph, compute K and C. Use scales d and L, read K and C, and enter these values in the table on reverse side of sheet. 11. Add all values of K and all values of C for pipe under test. 12. If the total of all C values is less than one, enter the total of all K values Into the space for "Time Required in Seconds. " 13. If the total of all C values is greater than one, divide the total of all K values, by the total of. .ill. C values, to get tq. To make this division with the nomograph, use scales C and K, and read tq. gin!' '111 1� tRl tl Ol O M p P- Y O b N 10 1. c � to t 0 O 0 inpp nnO1ppON Oh f M N C n Q N O O V J N d O O if I I IIIIIIIII I 11911171111111 ifb 8Y O O O O p In ♦ M N p Y Ov n Ln p < M N n a n - - 2 O F I J 0 p O o p r, o 0 o c d p a n e M IN O Di O p ri fi O p W Z K O ILL 4 < V = Y A O v z z Cw O O U O O O p b P_J p 8 O O O O O O n O O p, ao r- .D u, C n N N jjf�llll�lllllllll�lillllffl�ihhl�lil�l�hli�il lilililil l�l�li/�l�/�/ail I�I I I I� I i I��i l i I�I i I i 4 � ,lj r. v 2 3 �-i f i in r CIDJ Zosz r] U W t v O vi a D n z w o z cr O U W ~ U ► o a M I w GnCL O (nn O Z _ (rW w Ii 2 F- H pOH V Q Z �J a 1AI CL 0 W W H U w W q to ILI LL :L tJ W U ~O F- Z zCID O w I O F (n ` W N W [. F- , v City of Tigard INSPECTION REQUEST for INSPECTION TIME: PERMIT NO. : DATE: -_!��r17V DATE ISSUED :^LL_ OWNERS NAME : ADDRESS: oST- CONTRACTO^ : TEST : Air � Water 0 , Visual p , Laborotory p , RESULT'Approved ❑ , Disapprove Pending n 1, 9 SKETCH; e— c�,� x. /13 1 INSPECTOR DATE I COTE: Attach supplemental test data beret] I 1 City of Tigard INSPECTION REQUEST for -;- �— IMPECTION TIME: �`.� PERMIT N0. DATE: _`1��%7 DATE ISSUED :— ! I OWNERS NAME : ADDRESS: CONTRACTOR : t'�*'. f� f�Lc%18�ti 6— TEST ' Air p, Water(7 , Vieual(jQ , Laboratory [] RESULT: Approved , Disapproved G , PendinQ�p' SKETCH: / ,r Hc'!. / )S�>//3 f1[�a! C'f tt'r-✓�)�i .rG7 _Sc` c f / J ' INSP C OR DATE LOTHAttach supplemental tett data hent} i ,.. �.e nee •.r � nw �� i4r�. . .`>f::.`•A. �L:�irriirrr!3t'�LNw� ,,.'�'TT/'rru7il�i��..�,;�,� ``,� a.i'v:�. 1�i s'�i� tw. 'rM:�.. ,.4,.a .. DEPARTMENT rr,MERCE-PLANS REVIEWL1C 5 ON NOTICE OF PLANS REVIEWAvro^/i>rc• / b74 HUkCH N E., ALI.,1, UR GUN 973 I1i (THIS If N/�OT A BUIlUINO PERMIT) -Sys`" L Q 'Vk 'e ;UP Building� /�l� ti115�::._L_'+�I./S/y/rU�+ L'jt. �1a�s�i JNd � � _,r�y _— N. Q 711/��"�� _ Building Addres pct County(L f1 J!G'� oau anc F-.,2 A1/>r/U�/�/�r12/!r �/� /I j� e�'- '',,,I;, p y Const Sound Value 7_ Plen Fe Archltectt�Y /r&_/Z1 f-//ZS7RIP./NAAP_14�A,vv Bldg. ErAddltion ❑ Alteration,[] Date Received il 'i I AcIcIm.>ZI/!1�/SN/Nt5 CiT• -�!4 1�1-1 `K6 RD Til 1RO y Date Reviewed vne41of ' atriNef reT�-=�/. .. A»le / Fire Walls FIre,Efupef -Exits_�/ ft Main Flt, BawmeAr" --lil.��. ^- Tot Width T Stairs _/__ Wert. Shafts / Sprinklers _/�_/ _`- Man. Alarm . S.P. Closed Closed No Yes A as Covered Int. Size Ext. IExt. �__ _/ Ht. Det. . _J_.____t` Floor `seg., Roof _Sir. Members i Clau We. Type Area Covd. _ t Wall cove --•""'T___-- Mir. rm. encl. Type flus Type Htq'�sfaup, '---F ...__. The submitted plans have been reviewed for conformity with fire protection statute$ and regulations of Oregon admin lsteied by this office. Items No. checked on the enclosed list are applicable. These items and any specially noted provisions must be incorporated into the project to meet currtnt fire protection regulations. Approval of submitted plans is not an approval of omissions or oversights by this office or of noncompliance with any applicable regulations of local ctovernment. REMARKS: S G%'SD/��,�liC'S�°��r/�tLk/z "]!`1. i9 ls, ,f�'/iC/. /.`/.� �C9/��. //1/S�1_ _F �/_'�.1•�I.�S�_ .'.y/ � /S/,�'_��1�+!C'-1 L•a 1 i)1'sir'; r2-_ A,1,�G Lit11//.:J7 _aPPP4LJ/jiy/-�Sl/�T/G cI ,_ •Du.l�/v[, .��)f-//1C l�cP/��"TAIE,�rG o�i}��1:LcIN /11tI.ST%fit�i��cJv%f�i�=/� �'�113G'�'J�_.>✓l._.t?—f�, Examined by Copies tr !- �llr'll/_�1G� r'/ 7-_ �L-i�' .lJ/_=/�clTyr 0 '- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCF-PLANS REVIEW SECTION NOTICE OF PLANS REVIEW ROOM 376,STATE OFFICE (WILDING, PORTLAND 97201 (THIS If NOT A BUILDING PERMIT) BuildingC',CA�C/1 ski//3L/�/fit/ , GSD, 'Yd t ,S/ NU6 rIZ6 Ie—D. ' /Z/ � N.A2 K.. 7.e� Building Address 0arS//O� 462-8-: j +��,�'h//�vt&/J� M 6.1= &,41:'p .LYlz�. •-�C.) -SU/'i''��_ - ,,Kv A. rAlr 1L�/t/YS /� e c%/�i -�:7 ¢ _ _,1f'>�i2 /d., •v...rT+* �n•w.r. .,w.• % •ver.,. ..« .. CITY OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION TIGARD DATE _, 19_' N° 0008 THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR APERMIT FOR 1HE WORK HEREIN INDICATED OR AS SHOWN AND APPROVED IN THE ACCOMPANYING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, OWNER PHONE f:1iirks Nubliohinc Co. 6960 6.W. sandburg Struet OWNER — ADDRESS BUILDER PHONE _ A veru—KUotur, Inc. ENGINEER HOMM(pll b Stahl BULLL1E ARCHITECT`_—,_ — DESIGNER D 'CTURE ❑NEW 1:3 REMODEL ❑ADDITION ❑REPAIR_ _❑_RENEWAL ❑FIRE DAMAGE ❑DEMOLITION_ l,_1 RESIDENCE EICOMM ❑EDUCATIONAL ❑GOWT ❑RELIGIOUS❑PATIO ❑CAR PORT ❑GARAGE ❑STORAGE❑SLAB ❑FENCE ❑BOND ❑MOVING ❑CONDITIONAL USE ❑DESIGN REVIEW QCOUNCIL APPROVED ❑SIGNS .—_t---_—lCii nue r a — — -- _ --_ A._ OCCUPANCY LAND USE ZONE BLDG.TYPE--FIRE ZONE_-_ PLAN CHECK BY_____ HEAT 229 2 2.3acrar 400-07, 00 �!C_LOAD FLOORLOAD ` _ HEIGHT NO.STORIES — AREA VALUE HUIL0114G DEPARTMENT 350 100' 150' 20 -�,r SET BACKS FRONT REAR LEFT SIDE RIGHT SIDE Lermit •uu ---- -- ---.� - --- - -- THIS PERMIT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN THE BUILDING CODE, ZONING F heck. REGULATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES, AND IT IS HEREBY AGREED THAT THE WORK WILL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH Recording ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES. THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT WAIVE RESTRIC71VE COVENANTS. CONTRACTOR AND SUB CONTRACTORS TO HAVE CURRENT CITY BUSINESS 1%State 7• LICENSE. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR SEWER, PLUMBING AND HEATING. Total 1.11. .87 -" I APPI ICAN7 OR AGENT ---_ ----- Approved Receipt No. ADDRE55 --- —f>HOW ------- DATE INSP. TYPE INSPECTION --- REMARKS PLUMBING DATE Contractor u - —/ l r " ,iTMi r -�= -- Permit No. � _ ROU h in __ Fixture _— ye--� Final Cf /0.7 .2 / -��`=- BEATING Contractor _ Permit No. -7e{ y --------____----_ Gas or Oil w., V fi7-l� w Y>, �� O� Rou hin -- /b•-3o -1 y Jit [, r �.. f Final ----— SEWER — T� ./ J Final Ap �' �+ 1 t- DRIVEWAY Final / -NAL�L' Il'I "' Kt•c'- _ (Rain Drain) Final I0 .-211 b / lK'. Sidewalk •.___—_ -/ Curb&Street Final BLaG PT. F NALTE _ roach MPORARY CERTIFICATE OCCUPANCY _ CERTIFICATE OCCUPANCY Final Landscaping Zoning Final v CM OF TIGAKD 12420 S. w, Main Street TIGARD, OREGON 9723: APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT r�',w Construction ❑( Demolish ❑ Addition LJ Remodel ❑ Move ❑ ZONING_M- Z DATE ISSUED BUILDING PERMIT DATE RECEIVED C 3-7 4 BUILDING FEE No. $ 711 tx� BY PLAN CHECK $ 'J L y_j U A -- OTHER ! / V1,fr $ 7 1,� VALUATION $ TOTAL $Jl z RECEIPT No. TWO SETS OF PLANS AND PLOT PLANS MUST BE FURNISHED WITfi APPLICATION LOT M MAP N (r . F 1 c. s r k.. 9.:_% I --► (4.0 - L_1."„fY CENSUS TRACT JOB N Architect or Engineer n ,y Address t 4'L 1I1 Syy�1 � 'Z� �� _ Phone 24 t -9 4 1 Owner ci� T�Ct_ F .. ��a�� _ C,., Address 11 _ _Phone _ Builder 5 ,., Address �,�75 S' C�,�_.:�. .., 11 1 .�.ts t'or '= Phone L9-7.7_ ?_? BUILDING USE Single Rea. ❑ Multi Res. ❑ Comm. ❑ Industrials OCCUPANCY GROUP �7-2- No. of Stories_Z Total Height -L*?- Area of Lot.Z.3 Type of Construction I II III ) IV V Floor Area C _ 12-t�'jow_ 2 01 Set Backss Front 3_'� Back 1 &9` L.Si.de \ so R.Side 'ZOr Private Sewer pipe Size Sewer—7,- Septic Tank ❑ Water. service Pipe Size Storm Sewer l;q Ditch ❑ Drywell❑ Street and Curb Requirements Driveway Width ';0 I No. of Parking Spaces (_� SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR SEWER AND PLUMBING / SPECIAL INFORMATION dcl �;L' l LG/► rr AL,Tr,(_ 2,- ADDRESS ASSIGNED' FIELD CHECK BY DATE DERMIT APPROVED BY��,..,. It is understood that all work will conform with applicable codes and ordinances of the State of Oregon and the City of Tigard, Oregon, and that the building will not be occupied until a Certificate of occupancy has beep issued by the City of Tigard Building Inspector. Signature bf Applicant c7h ret DATE CONNECTION CHARGE COMPUTATION SHEET 1. COMMERCIAL, DRYINDUSTRIAL, PUBLIC STRUCTURES, CAR WP-9I1, MANUAL, CAR WASH, AU`'.L'ATIC LAUNDRIES, LAUNDROMATS, ETC: A. BUILDING ARKA YZ 4l1 SQ. F'l'. . 1500 = ` DU B. LOT AREA ACHE X 4 = - - L)U C. FIXTURE UNITS /LFIXTURE Utv. ,'S - 16 - L _ DU 2. SPECIAL SERVICES: El0W,NTARY SCHOOL 3171DENTS = 17 = DU /O HIGH SCHOOL & (ALLEGE STUDENTS r 4p = DU CHURCHES SEATS - 25 = DU HOSPITALS - GENERAL BEDS DU GONVALESCENT/RES`I' HOME, BEDS 2 DU SLERPING ACCO1440DATIOP49 WITH(jUT KITCHENS ROOMS - 2 - DU ,n CONI MJTS: r 7/ l j /3�s•w�-l�1'l 1 i 19- r ly �— G/p."..rL ! e/ j ro b �6 �v �v�V r DEPARTMENT OF DOMMBst'U -^ISMS REVIEW SLUION NOTICE OF PLANS REVIEW 674 iIIWCH y SAI LM, Oft.GOPJ (THIS IS NO'A BUILDING PERMIT) A„ildin ,KAti ��.�/11�'G -7Y' r'/ Build,nq Ad no pr) J�"G� .tnty��.2Q�...�..—_n_ Occupant y�ifi Cry �✓4F �._.____ Const. Sound Value T Q.T.,Plan�FFt Now Bldg. E''Addition p Alteration ❑ Date Received Addreea 7 SkiQ -9L� " �ato Reviewed � Z7 Stories — Are1i 22Y 7� -- Attic Fire Wells Fire Escape%!✓S, Exits.a� h. i f Meln Flr. Basement Ht. Stops Tot.Width Stairs Vcrt. Shafts ^S .J_'-” Sprinklers __� ' / Man. Alarm N's S.P. Closed ` Closed No Yes Area Covered t(,11If� Int. Site Ext. Ext. A[�.it.__f. Ht. Det.�S_r._ �/� Floo(t�? '"M CellingR'h�Roof&I'MP $fr. Membe"C�"* Class No.<ooft Type Area Covd, "P4 A L✓ e Wall cover��tt.6�. kffilPR— Hit. rm. encl. A�d(OA,I(lL1A�J_ Type flue /✓3 Type Htg. System—'A Fuel ��^ WCJO ErL Int. The submitted plans have been reviewed for conform ty with fire protection statutes and regulations of Oregon admin- istered by this office. Items Na. checked on the enclosed list are applicable. These items and any specially noted provisions must be Incorporated Into the project to meet current fire protection regulations. Approval of submitted plans ie not an approval of omissions or oversights by this office or of noncompliance with any applicable regulations of local government. °rMARKS:411 /T__.� rl'i9J4►'rc/'C�L7-L'��'LI-04s.�S �1'f�1�1 � oe rI_�n/,g/�V//N�c o C'iC�o D�/�PL! W,Si�/ts,� y�lU�?.�'' T//C�'i�i✓S �cL �15� *0A X / We,'. SYL�'� dN/g L�d_�.�%1/Y / /C G?DL'►N�. L �/ .�s�OGE shy �'��7��3t1ll sc!/QF.Q�'�' Is'��r�/� ��.�.�'•�c�yL�i7�11�L/��_r.._�3eG� � � o •—:�— Qf- Examined by �— '`'r9 cops.+S t PRS-2 .0, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE—PIANS REVIEW SECTION NOTICE OF PLANS REVIEW RnOM 976,STATE OFFICE BUILDING,PORTLAND 97201 (THIS IS NOT A BUILDING PERMIT) MIMI _V tt �ANQRAEII_ G Izb� T/G'A/ZD,_ No. 191-7 Building Address , / S DFiG/('C� El�i/l/Z�1 S lN/lT /S ST/2LlCT'u�CE BE P2Q �'P" B H Aura n►Wrle— �/✓/CL $ S�Ee /yi S 1YpTF•o Z4_1 ITE/11 ,�/ ///Yd i�Y •CL r'O i�l/ �!�E ��r Sf'R�N��F,e ,asAnCs�oN¢_�fr� _ t�f/G �,epoiArF Ff'("hl etr r l�C s'cr1/.n•rTE��Q fY,1 o.�ic� .CrJ2 / �2PP�t/•y�c,��_ r�t_LNJT/�.c.Cp> //!' ,rN�ivN SND S�9N1I��/o�Y _ We SCN:/7/_ OF _STrF OJC D•QFGey ,�'L� vE 7" EDiIio.Y�p A/o STc?��oF v444VA S 64�f-�!- ,E A/ 1LlL� F AfP^97--4f- FAA T Fic = OF �t/1t1d/� rASD _ u.sED�- / E A�"!)i2/��•d /✓/Y/S ENS/NF.&�R�Nl�.,/1Y1�-- C/Ns .�f_EL_1..Ez�O-1s .Suls'�l�rrF T / �a�r�T��✓�ff�E.�'Bo��ivv /tom'VS_zr_6'16i / � _ ----- STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Plana Review Number ._. _ ' PIANS REVIEW !SECTION CHECK-MARKED REGULATIONS, IN ADDITION TO ANY REQUIREMENTS APPEARING ON THE r1:'rACHED REVIEW NOTICE, MUST 11E INCORPORATED INTO THIS PROJECT. Approval of submitted plane does not constitute approval of any ondesions or oversights nor of noncompliance with any applicable .regulations of local government that may exceed State repuirements, 1 Structure required to be (3 Type 1) ( Type II) throughout due to (❑ area) 'rl height) 2 One-hour fire resistance rating required Pa all interior construction. .1 All living units+ required to be completely sepm•ated by one-hour fire resistive construction. 4 Exit corridors req,iire separation from any other area by one-hour fire resistive construction. 5. Fire resistance of doors of interinr opening@ to corridors required to equal 1%" solid core. doors. Relight@ In cor- ridors require wired glen@ set In fixed (@teell framing 6 Storage rooms, closets, laboratories, shops and areae of similar hazard require separation from other areae by at least one-hour fire resistive construction Furnace and boiler rooms require one-hour 'Ire resistive construction. 7 All vertical opening@ ouch an stalcwav@, trash chutes, etc. require full enclosure of (I 1-hour) (❑ 2-hour) fire reelatence Access wave to much shafts require self-closing and latching Close B fire door aeeembliem (L7. 1-hour rased) ( 7 1441-hour rated) 8 Attic areas require draft harriers as per .Sec 3205, not exceeding each 3.000 square feet (9,000 square feet where sprinkler protection provided ) 9 Voids created by gelling-floor 4vmtems require draft barriers not exceeding each 1.000 square feet. in Building projections surh as halconles, eaves, overhangs, etc.., require fire protection equal to interior ceilings with all openings protected as required for reilings to prevent passage of fire Into building voids and attics. 11. Fire stops, blocking or framing members pierced for utility runs require packing to equal fire resistance prior to such pierring. Wood frame construction requires fires,opping of both vertical and horizontal draft openings at max- Ims.rm Intervals of I0 feet 12 Corridors require at least 8 feet in dear width Drinking fountains or other equipment may not operate in a man- ner which would obstruct the minimum 8-toot width. 13 Corridor@ serving patient bedronms require at least it feet In width 14. Cnrrldore require smoke barrier partitions with doors at 150-tont intervals. 1.1 Exit doors from lobbles, corridors and rooms with potential occupancies of 50 or more are required to swing in the dtrectlon of exit t!avel. 18. Exit doors from lobbies, corridors and assembly areas require panic hardware 17 Hardware for all doors Is requlrad to be of simple type having no provisions for locking against egress, with obvious .nethod of operation. 18. At least 44" (inches) in clear width, without projections, In required for exits and patient room doors through which patients must he transported In wheelchairs, stretchers or beds. 19 Sleepinp rooms require at least one w+ndow readily openable from inside without special tools and providing o clear opening of not lees than 720 square inches with the least dimension not lose than 22 Inches. Maximum per- mitted height to bottom of opening from floor Is 48 Inches, (Ref: Sec. 1904) 20. S,trface flame spread rates of wells and callings, minimum requirement: stairway-25. corridor@--75, other rooms -425. (Sec. 4209) 91. Combustible acoustical material required to be secured with staples or equivalent metallic holders or a heat resist- ant adhesive capable of withstanding 1000• F for one-half hour. PNS•4 22. All curtains, drapes and similar furnishings are required to be noncombustible or rendered and maintained flame- proof. 23 Rows of seats between aisles may not exceed 14. Rows of seats opening rnto aisles at one end only may nut exceed 7 scats. (Sec continental spacing, Sec. 3313-3314) 24. Seat row spacing, back to back, required to be at least 33 Inches, or 27 inches plus thickness of seat back and in- clination of back. 25. Posting of capacity of assembly areas as noted is required by ORS 479.195. r20. Heating, cooking, air conditioning and similar service equipment are required to be approved and !rsted by a no- tionally recognized testing agency, such as V.L., Inc., and to be installed in compliance with agency's specifications and recognized safe practic^s. The installation of ventilation systems is required to be in substantial conformity with the 1970 U.B.C., Volume II Corridors are not acceptable for use as supply or return air plenums. 27. A dust collection system is required for shop areas for nonportable machines emitting or producing dusts. (Ref: Sec. 1008) Dust collection equipment to be located outside of building or in ont-hour separated room equipped lwith automatic sprinklers. C28. ,Pressure relief valves ere required for all water heaters, installed either in separate water tank port or in port for hot water line. Shutoff valves may not be located between a water tank and relief valve. 29. A firefighting water supply is required within 500 feet of building that is capable of producing 500 gprn (mini- mum) for 10 minutes for each 5,000 square feet of floor area within building up to a maximum of 500 gpm for 30 minutes or from 5,000 to 15,000 gallons of stored or static water. (Ret: ORS 479.200) 30. Interior wet standpipes at least 2 inches in diameter located and equipped as per Sec. 3804 are required. Couplings and connections required to be American National Standard Thread. Where standpipes are served by sprinkler piping, a 1-inch reducing orifice is required at the hose valve connection. Q1'il. Approved automatic sprinkler protection throughout occupancy is required. Piping to be flushed of debris, with certification of flushing submitted to this office. 32. Approved automatic sprinklers are required over and under stage and in all auxiliary areas, including dressing rooms, storerooms and workshops. (Sea 3802) Sprinkler feed piping required to be flushed of debris, with certifi- cation of flushing submitted to this office. 33. Stage roof ventilators displacing at least 5%,, of stage floor area, openable by hand from stage floor and by fusible link ur other heat activated device, are required. (Sec. 3901-00) 34. An approved fire alarm system with signals audible throughout building and manual alarm sending stations adja- cent to exits from each floor or area are required. 35. An approved electrically supervised combustion detection of the ionization type is required for all patient rooms. 36. All exit doors and access ways thereto are required to be Identified by approved electrically illuminated signs served by two circuits with one separate from all other circuits. (Sec. 3312) 37. An emergency power system is required for the ( ) gymnaslum ( ) auditorium ( 1 building to maintain exit illumination for not less than one-half hour in event of public utility failure 38. Fluorescent Light fixtures installed on combustible surfaces are required to be U.L., Inc., approved for such mount- ing, or installed to provide at least I-inch air space between the fixture housing and combustible material. NOTE local regulations or insurance standards for most favorable insurance credit may, and rften do, exceed these mieimum State requirements. n e MI ya` ARCNIMIS A MANNLH£ 1 � Y , I FRANK A RUMMEI AIA mmnnmIIW lVhm0normfDIWIMIm JMIN I SfAIII. AIA r�ppMY�t►dt1�1�n aaOmMlgnY�rhd11�8n 1421 S W 12th Avc. Portland, Ore 97201 AUDENUUM NO. 1 Itirziied Tilly 9. 1974 i,rualy-Warehouse and Office Building for (;l.i,RKL T'I'�,LXSVING CU. Portland, Ore. c;u,itria r:tor: f verr>rr Kostur Inc. -,or.tland, Ore. J. sheet No. 2 of 12, Noutuaticm Plant At intersection of lines 4 & D, and lines 8 & E delete note " 6" Gravel under." (under slab) and .add note "Level grade under slab with minimum of 1" sand" r E 1 CITY OF TIGARD 639.4171 GATE BUILDING PERMIT TAX MAP LOT NO. SUBDIVISION ____ OWNER JOB ADDRESS �r� �d.l.-1l`-' J�c�f_'c (,- BUILDER _ _ STATE REG.NO. EXP.DATE BUILDER'S PHONE PHONE 22-('4 �p / J � 1 ARCHITECT—� .L f.,,'CI ONE �!-1 1 ��-OTHER — cTRUCTURE ❑ NEW ❑ Rri0DEL ODITION _+❑ REPAIR ❑ MOVE ❑ OTHER _0 DEMOLITION RESIDENCE c0MM ❑ EDUCAT N ❑ IND ❑ RELIGIOUS 1.7 ACCESSORY 0 GARAGE ❑ OTHER O FENCE f)CCUPAN�" _�i i,�_LAND USE ZONE BLDG.TYPE V[F._FIRE ZjDNE.�!PLAN CHECK BY �_'Zile HFAY SEWER PERMIT I OCC.LOAC FLOOR LOAD o HEIGHT g2 NO.STORIES AR ND.BECROOMS VALU4 /It —BUILD ING DEPARTMENT SET BACKS FRONT .Qi Wo"SIDG RIGHT SIDG-- ' o ■rr Permit /S Q THIS PERMIT IS ISSUED SIISJECT TO THE REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN THE BUILDING CODE, ZONING ,REGULATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES,AMD I%R9 HERESY AGREED THAT THE Plan Chep k '�� IyhRK Wli 1. BE DONE A ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND IN COMPLIANCE --- WI�`H ALL APPLICAB:E CODES AND ORDINANCES. THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERFAIT DOES NOT WAIWE PI.Ck.Fire iIESTRICTIVE COVENANTS. CONTRACTOR AND SUB ,ONTRACYORS TO HAVE CURRENT CITY BUSINESS TAX PERMITS.SEPARATE PERMIYS REQUIRED FOR SEWER,PLUMB.WG AND HEATING. State Tax + Total APPLICANT OR AGENT Y _ ------------- —` — PI')CI Prepd. '_3 1) ReCelpl No. ADDRESS ----- ------- --------—-- --�i+oNE -- Bal.Due 1 700, leaved qy ---Approved By_pil suc ' d if ?7 If , Poc 71e SEWER CONNECTION 5 _ ��, �4, r7Z' 1 SEWER INSPECTION SEWER SURCHARLA: 1 � CITY OF TIGARD SANITARY AND STORM SEWER SYSTEMS INFORMAT'ON Property Owner/Project N me: � a Contact Person:, Q�a' C JEI.f.�j `J�r�• 4 e e hone: Street Address of Project: ` ;� �.�__... Zip Cod- . Mailing Address for Billing: L _ -p Code Tax Lot 6 Map No. . �)� 2 c _ Building Permit No. : NEW CONSTRUCTION COMMERCIAL L'� Sewer Permit No. : TiNANT HOD1FICATIONINDUSTRIAL -: . ADDITION TO EXISITING ✓ DWELLING SANITARY SEWER UU's for connection at `____per unit = _ DU 's Plumbing Units (Fixtures) for u.;age fees (16 fixture units = 1 plumbing unit) Permit (Inspection) fee aa s'1'0RM DRAIN Impervious Area: sq. ft. LRU's for SDC charges per 10,000 sq. ft . = I units (Impervious area : 2500 = units at p e r unit ) Distribution- Copies Date Finance " By: File Other i IM: � � --� s I s o aL N � d ^ a �4 N 1 U1 u soSx Z ye 4 6 ........... FOR PHOTOS SEE PHOTO BOOK Lq Ir"., D a burn , � ree �