The URL can be used to link to this page

11533 SW HALL BLVD-2 t r� i` i p! f b I 1 i �F .11533 :3V7 HALL BOULEVARD �y�r,±yf��`�t�J aC;.=- Lt�"iwn:..�w.r�+.y.r.�w..ri'F•%!'-\� A,14 10 2 rj) X LIJ LL LL ul Lij � r J �i .. I�.1 � � �/ • : ,fig , 'k�� Lr? - W t� ;,t_ice •�, .�,- i�`\ '� :'fit ,w�: •• 1 ��i.�� ,�1�� f W VWX A/ RIS Ail �! 14 4 r! — — - ------------- --— IP 1/2 F72T12 OL/HO LAMPS lR REO'DI _ 6C37 IL I t2rSaT8 STL MOUNTINC PLATE I - ( _ - 11/2.1200 STEL —130- 71, 30— 173 1/2 I� OHANO HOLE 19 I YItM 6 x 6 COfER rn I I ccn o N I I N c: I I 4 2 HOZ ,IN � N O T I I I ELECTRICAL CONDUIT tot OTHERS) —4o affTITM MT� a �► l! REVISIONS OF IF tlw Le• w_• -. —}— 15 5/32 I I 2 12 2 1/2 1MK STL PLATE I (2 RFO'D) I i —_-- — — 5 3 _ —" " — 5/16 DIA MOLE 12 PER PLATE) t DIA FLEC• OUTLET 11i16 DIA HOG£ FOR SIB Ti (LEFT PLATE ONL/I MOUNTING4 PER PLATE) ATAT E)L 1EI 2 BALLAST I I 01 TOM PLATE DE: 1 AIL. REO'D) SCALE' 1/4.1 - - t CALCULATIONS LOAO.2.112130)•63 36-K 5 12 67 80LI LOAO•-6J-36-•4.08 4.08120•.204 USE 5/8 9OL1 T S A.•.226 7.75 8.16 •302 •0308(6) ,•07245 —�— 21,00 --10 -•---�.S- - DETERMINE GROUND POLE REQUIREMENTS PLATES 4' (12')•48 SO FT• f.0441•2.112 IS-K(195-11-412 513f.040-.199 3_113Q) ,4.513f.044)•.199 Ib-KII10.5)•33.93 416.97 ----_--. 144 7:(1 1168)_•8 161.044)•.359 1 b-K 184)•30.16 v 5REO'0• 2197-•17.66 TN3 USF !/8x 7x7 ASOO GRDB STEEL TUBE S OF TUBE•18.9 IN-MAX STRFSC• -•25.370 K•S•I 127 18.8 CHECK TOROUc TUBE . K•S•I ••T2.O K.S I• 1R1 5/181105 AVERAGE STRESS•--2� ??-9! )121 (4. •1 681 6972) 2(4.69721 f4,687J 2 1 4 TORSIONAL, RESISTANCE--- •f®.,•,68r-- -•32 965 IN .31.2 3i2 g• 57!----, 0000034 RAD OR 0003' INSIC• 12(106732..18 CHECK MOUNTING BOLTS MOM--2=t1Y- (24)•2S 344 �5:3!1,4,2244 PER BOLT -"?!-•.2112 I42REO'11 20 USE 4-5/9 DIA BOLTS 1.5•A•••226 MAX STRESS PER 80LT•-!'226?-•4 112 K.S•I 120 CHECK ALUMINUM HOUSING MEIGMI•-��8, •S.5 OORST CTigDITION•dEICMT LOAD TOP OR BOTTOM BE1vEEN POLES GREATEST MOMENT•-111-�S=`I-•8934.7/9500••940 IN. REG'0- S OF ALUMINUM EVIRUSION+1.2768 IN.3 MAX STRESS ON ALUMINUM- 93� 1 •0991 P.S I 1.2768 6997 P.S I X9500 AI.,�%IEU CHECK FOOTING 1COTING FROM CMAPI.4',4',4'•494.693 1b-Kx476 970 REO'O IT MAX L I NF l GAG 6 6 AMPS 21 ONE 15 AMP CIRCUIT • 120 VOL" pED'D• — �._ 31 FACE MAIEPIAL' •150 TNK LEXAN cuslan[4 KINDERCARE BCr[0 T NabST01ES.TOR 41 SICK SERVICE• SLIDE FACE talc 4,12 0•F SIGN twl �Erta IMO., RAM 36.3 / t4 F1. CENTER POLE MOUNT n onosll ALxeAnA aeou 51 PAINT SICK DAPI1 PPOWIN -- -' 00rr I.M D DATlit ALE 1/e•1 OMC ra F) OF�IGN WIND LOAD. 44 P.5•F• cwxo o+•E fL#'�"'P,I L'U• J R E— 4' 17 2 V C U� 41 C U rn C G Rf L\ U 7 J. Li Kinder Care ZQ Q Q 0 fn LLI —� > • , y �-�� 1 \DIY ^ Ol IA CL ^^ •.ter L�� co w c.c N — � '`� �"�a `� _--_ -- •I -- -- —. ids>n-��_•�� I til , II _�I� ILS' �•�L �.L-r�C=' i-`Fes'•F �-•1r ® a nr wT ® 1■Ir Permit No. SP 150-88 CITY OF 1IGARU --` SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION iho applicant hereby applies for• a permit for the work indicated or as shown in the accompanying plans and specifications. A SIGN LOCATION ADDRESS: 11533 S.W. HALL. BLVD. ZONING: C-F NAME OF COMPANY: KINDER CARE APPLICANVAGENI : MARTIN BROS. SIGNS, INC. - STEVE EYERLY, SALES CONSULTANT The City of Tigard imposes. an annual Business Tax which must be kept current on all persons doing business in the City Do you pr•c-sently have a current Business Tax? YES i 1 PROPOSED SIGN: i PERMANENT (X ) FRLLSTANDING (X ) f TEMPORARY ( ) WAIA. BILLBOARD SIGN DIMENSIONS: 4' X 12' TOTAL SIGN AREA (Sq. ft. ) : 9G _ WALL AREA (Sq. ft_ ) : ---- HEIGHT (ft): 18' F —_ PROJECTION: ILLUMINATION: YES ( X ) NO ( ) COPY: BINDER CARE LEARNING CENTER -�— -- - - MATERIALS: METAL FRAME/PLASTIC FACE - EXISTING SIGNS: 3 X 9 WALL SIGN (27 SQUARE FEET) i OTHER PERMITS REQUIRED. YES ( ) NO (X i COMMENTS: � PLANNING UFPARTMENI All sign permits must be accompanied by .+ Permit Fee: _) scale drawing and plot plan If work l Receipt No. : 100568 _ authorized under a sign permit has not barn II Approved By: DS completed within ninety days after the � Oeste: 9/6/88 issuance of the permit, the permit shall become null and void. I CERTIF Y THAI I AM THE. RECOROEO OWNER Of 1 HI PROPERTY OR AN AGENT AUTHORIZED -SY Tl{E OWNER. j i Applicant' s Signature r P.U. BOX 1012. TUALATIN, ..__.OREGO / 97062 639-1.780 '�-.. .�.._.._:.,..;..�,.,.�:;»'"%t. .il• ..�t+Addr+ess __.a:�= . ..— .--. ,._.. -'taluph�� MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Ed Murphy, Communiry Development Director July 26, 1988 FROM: Arad Roast, Building Official � SUBJECT: Grading, "Kindercare" - 3.153.5 SW Hall Boulevard Thera have been questions raised over the finish grading by the adjacent property owner to the above referenced project. The property owner to the south of the project claims there is excessive storm water discharging onto hia property as a result of the re-grading of the "Kindercare" lot. In review of the original topography, the undeveloped "Kindercare" property sloped downward in a south to southwest direction towards the adjacent property. The "Kindercare" property was elevated along the south property line in a manner as to level the property. A majority of the "Kindercare" property is now collecting storm water by means of roof drains, parking lot catch basins and yard drains, which are discharged to the storm sewer system. This would lend iteelf to less storm water flowing onto the adjacent property. A question has also been raised as to why the "toe" (bottom) of the slope created by the "Kindercare" project was not set back from the property line as specified in U.B.C. Section 7011(c). The answer is as follows: o The intent behind the section is to provide for maintenance of the slope and has no bearing on surface drainage. o The Building Official may approve alternate setbacks to the Code. cn/61.05D (� Per•mi t No. SP 122-88 CITY OF 1IGARD --- SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION The applicant h,areby applies for a permit for the wort, indicated or as shown in the arcompan,ling plans and specifications. SIGN LOCATION AODRESS. 11533 S.W. HALL BLVD. 7ONING: C-P NAME OF COMPANY: KINDER CARE APPLICANT/AP.;F_N1 : MARTIN BROS. SIGNS, INC. - STEVE EYERL.Y, SALES The City of Tigard imposes. an annual Business Tax which must be kept current on ;il p(ersons doing business in the City . Do you presently gave a current Business 7ax7 PROPOS1.0 SIGN: -��— PERI-ANENT (X ) 1'RLESTANDING ( ) TEMPORARY ( ) WALL ( X) ( ) S16N DIMCNSIONS: _ 31 X 91 HII_L.BUARD TOTAL SIU'N AREA (Sq . ft. ) : 27 WALL AFLA (Sq. ft. ) : 540 HEIGHT (ft) : _ 91 PROJF:_'TION: _ _ 8111 ILLU,"IINAT[ON. YES ( X ) NO ( ) COPY: _ KiNPER CARE LEARNING CENTER MATERIALS: METAL, FRAME/PLASTIC FACE EXISTING SIGNS: NONE 3714ER PERMITS REQUIRED: YES ( ) NO ( ) COMMENTS: 30 sq. ft. Max. C.P. zone. Present code does not allow any d(jdiLjQUaL signage.�Sign lo7ate0 on front wall face. PLANNING DEPARTMENT � All sign permits must be accompanied by ,+ Permit Fee: , � scale drawing grid plot plan. If work Receipt ho_ . aruthorized under a, sign hermit has not been Apirova Bv: _ _ completer! within ninety days after 0w Date: _-7�� g�� issuance of the permit, the perwit shat I &V9 :sE,r`rr become null and void. ��'7�� ff /lc- I CERTIL Y THAI I AM THF RECORDED OWNER Ot lift PROPERTY OR AN AGENT AUTHORIZED •3Y T14E OWNVR. Applicant' s Signature " - P.O. BOX 1012, TUALATIN, OREGON 97062 503-639-1780 _� address ttrluphu1111 r4R REFERL: LL 0',Lr): n4 1 1 E3er�c<> lndu4Atla: Otivct r �y,.• ;+,.�� ,.- ;•;�r 4,,�';i r YGIJ q S .tkmT; .r Ft. i:�epo it AL: 36[x:3:' '??1� "�y� ` �",` �`�.t GLAoCK I r. J n r�� r .. rn � t, a� z1�",'!�^e,�..•i.� _.._...—=�. _....... .l S Ik'�.\ r:1, r'zi 1 ' (r r 1` , I 1 It"iu�,j..11 r+ •��{�,. C, I. rr._..•a.. {1 �� I:.� ,' �H I �� t �/ +..rl •� ��+, Iu'`-/J I � 1 � ��1 , ' ' Wit. ,.... .'. C.. w.....1 :...� ♦...w_.rl � I � '-a ; ..Lr,....;� LVti.-r] A' ' • Y 000—fr' ,f' 1 1 1 1 a•, } I•�, �-. iF SY' r t C r 1 R�'•t� � Y � } � r��a +._ t 1 `-:�"p:'��- _•._......_..._...ter.... x."...W._t -.�.._.j.'T-':.''i.._.�._.--__...__� ..�.,�.___.... ^. .. �,.;1 �DA�K �eaw►J fi .ac� �•F2 aM ty Po�_�.: WA-LL SIG►.1At,� •--.. �Jruco y R��+�� ANY0� T �U'VUME+.IT Slt,k.l11C(e•� ��ucv wti5� MOV ILI.VM or,, I�+.voA C�,rJ f3�1�p /��-i Ot- 5F F 0>` i�Lvn, ae tJcu 161 ,,,, pYW►.l 5+crv/�c,�. _.:. F3t >vcs cb Q '1'v��h 3r.�t s•'► xro�3.e X +i 4 X�2 N Po L.t_ I CH NKT 0 I I Y I Ll11 i I .514ul I.00ATI Oti� __r=._'_'�-'�'•,�+�(,/�/�/.�.�/f�/"////%��I!�ii I��E li I�\M\.�F��. ::�j CO P T I O ti)A,4., IJU_ILLDItvC i 107 3/4 14 7/8 78--- F60T12 OL/HO LAMPS (3 REO'D) - _ F4 35 11/16 Tom— �`1/8r2 ALUM- MOUNTING. — — � � � STRAP t2 PLACES). . ELEC. `` OUTI.ET 663787 BALLAST —7 SUP SIGN FRONT ELEV CAL. CULAT i ONS : SIGN WEIGHT-182 POUNDS 3/8 COLT T•4•A—•0775 0 2000) =9304 SHEAR THERE ARE 4 WELDS-2 3/4 WELD LENGTH kELD-1/16 ALUM. WELD STRENGTH 8 166.67 s/LINEAR INCH ?•75(166.67) (4) =;041 .70. 45.3(a) •r91 .6 REO'D• FACE WEIGHT=107.75(35.687) (. 125) (•04331 .20.8120 MAX. (e) o4N,e� LOAD FAJE %lE!GMT ON,EXTRUS I ON= o -.2018 MAX• - ,, �•05045,IN PEO' D• ALUM. AS USED=V) .2768 IN j NOTE : 1) MAX LINE LOAD1 4.3 AMPS 2) ONE 15 AMP CIRCUIT 0 120 VO. S REQUIRED- 3) SIGN FACE MATERIAL . 125 LEXAN, WT •/ CUBIC INCH-.0433 4) ,SIGN SERVICE SLIDE FACE 5) ALL DIMENSIONS ARE 1N INCHES, 61 SIGN CARRIES A U•t - LABEL • 7) NON-ILLUM!NATED CONSTRUCTION IS SAME ,,' ILLUMINATED tF.SS ELECTFICAL COMPONETS• r ■e � — 8 1/4 -- – --- 14 718-- 4 /8—"4 R -- - II , ST1 3 REO oILAMPS i 214 2 DIA HOLES FOR DIA MOUNTING BOLTS I I l LIED BY INSTALLER) I DIE 0367-REIAINER DIE x365-FILLER — MOUNTING SURFACE TION SIDE ELEVATION ct,sTDME N K ! NDERCARE BENCO I01OUSTRIE4 INC ;iTIE 3,g 5-F, U.M. SIGN ONE DENCO INDU5tPlA1 DRIVE (iLLUM. d NOW ILLUM. INSTL.t Et. oEro51T. ALABAMA aeDa� 1 0"4 i,M,O, DATE 2/8/88 SCALE -.� DUG N0. E - 4 7 6 9 - 2 MATL i 7 1 { 001 P.00 0 m d 4 a'Ca I Zo r r C r+ O to N C: ad m H EI N x � to [ cd H Ln � �4 d to (,1. ^i1w _ 'N __ :ttYa6YtY��t:�'a'G'G�'. �a.m tx.. 1_ar•_ee_.�... e..-1.�ay;�sa r ),,,r`T, T,,�,y •/+�'R �\ �i � f' M�• ''l'i%41" �,/v�'� ��D 4�� j~••,a�it �' 1 ,o "S D��S�v�1 M�yr'r''�f�NM w �1 �l4{{ r S � •r ! hs "i�M i rt�'�': M FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU '] OFFICE OF FIRE MARSHAL 3 7092 INSPECTION NOTICE OWNER--- 11 ------ -DATE _ t'- OCCUPANT{l;NOrh'_ �fE - _----OCCUPANCY LOCATION YOUR ATTENTION IS CALLED TO 1HF FOLLOWING FIRE SAFF TY OFFICIFNCIFS: 00 FAILURC TO COpF'CT THE ABOVE CONOITIONS WITHIN 4A v 4 WILL MAKF_ YOU LIARLL_ 10 rpOSEC V.TIOp SIOULC rlwg RESULT FROM SUCH CONDITIONS YOU MAY BE LIABLE F'OR OAMh GFS TO VERSOJ1 " OrEBT L"lPRO VISIONS OF ORS 470 Igo _` HY WASHINGTON COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT M1 FI "MARSHAL. 20885 S.W. BLANTON STREET PRESEMIT'ED TO ALOHA,OREGON 97008 849.8577 -- I.ORM 000 - 40 II i ��r INSPECTION NOTICE City of Tigard Ruilding Department P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone: 63C-4175 Type of Inspection Date Requested lime A.M. P.M. Address ?57—Z2 V6,Permit Owner Lct Builder d The following Building Code deficiencies are required to be corrected: 4 4 Presented to Appr(ved Inspector Disapproved Date in C CALL FOR REINSPECTION �Es El No MW INSPECTION NOTICE Ci,y of Tigard Building Department P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone: 639-4175 Type of Inspection _11e.._- =�- Date Requested Time�� AM, P.M. M. Addi ess -- Permit #� Owner_ __ '- 'QN- �'1 R Lot # i Builder The following Building Code deficiencies are required to be corrected: z VL -T Presented to _ _— — Approved Inspector ❑ Disapproved Date - CALL FOR REINSPECTION [--] YES F—] NO COPY HALL BOULEVARD PROFESSIONAL VILLAGE 11565 S.W. Hall Boulevard �:.`(� Tigard, Oregon 97223 a � May 17, 1908 R19915JRN U� Kinder-Care Corporation MAY 0943 1988 7114 N.E. Hazeldel Ave. Vancouver, WA. 90665 CITY OF 1IGARD PLANNING DEPT. Attention: Sandy Noose Dear Ms. Moose: As owners of Hall Boulevard Professional Village, wit feel it necessary to notify you of our concern regarding y-)ur newly constructed building on the property adjoining ours to the North. We have had numerous problems during construction.. .involving your contractor as well as various sub-contractors. There seemed to be initial confusion regarding their method of obtaining permission to tear down our fence, use our water and electricity, as well as bulldozing shrubs, piling enormous amounts of dirt and mud on our sidewalks, etc. No permission was given by either owner or the manager of this building to do any of those things prior to the beginning of construction. 1-Jo-one involved on your behalf bothered to obtain the names of owners of record or name of authorized representative of this building. Therefore, even after both owners and the building manager have talked to the foreman on several occasions, we still have had numerous incidents that have the potential of becoming major problems! It seems that drainage of your property nas not been considered and is routed directly to the North side of )ur boundary. During construction, when the ground should hav : been soft, we did have. . . and are still seeing the results of the ncreased elevation of your building. Your property is now several feet higher than ours and slopes directly to our property line. . .thus runoff from the rain flows directly to the North side of our building, flooding sidewalks, grass areas and is also being absorbed under our building. We have contacted the City of Tigard Engineering and Planning Departments regarding this matter. Last week, we had a problem when various workerz began turning water valves on and off, disconnecting lines etc. , even before contacting our building manager. Several. times during that day, various Doctors in our building were left without water for brief periods which makes it extremely difficult to practice Dentistry! Alio, our sprinkler lines and control wires were disconnected, a water line broken. None of the workmen Involved seemed to be certain of which lines or wires belonged and should be reattached to wha .l r r HALL BOULEVARD PROFESSIONAL VILLAGE 11565 S.W. Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Bath Dr. Thomas and the Building Manager have gone to the site on several occasions co speak directly with the project foreman about these matters. . .especially our concern regarding the drainage. We have been repeatedly advised "that's what the bluprints call for." Having had the experience of construction ourselves, we do realize that you may not have been aware of these problems until now. However, we do expect these matters to be your financial responsibility and to receive full restitution for the following: 1 . Our sprinkler system. . .must be checked and repaired, if necessary, by a licensed professional because of the irresponsible manner of connecting, disconnecting and turning off and on both water lines and sprinkler system,including timer! 2. Our fence replaced and positioned to our satisfaction. 3. All grounds and parking lot on North side shall be cleaned up, barkdust and shrubs replaced. 4. Any water damage to grounds or building caused by water draining from your property shall be repaired. The beginning of a "good neighbor relationship" is important and hopefully these corrections can be made by you with your contractor before final inspections are complete! Thank you for your immediate ateenti.on to there ir:att:erc+. Sincerely, /P *UIh6�6—, eer wner DT,1tS:ch cc: William Dickas, Attorney at Law City of Tigard Planning Dept. City of Tigard, Department of Engineering 620 //�y S s•41. �'/a.�-� INSPECTION NOTICE City of Tigard Euildinq Department 13.0. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone: 639.4175 Tyne of Inspection AU —1-- — -- — —�— "' .)ate Requested —_ _ 7 — Time�„�. A.M._—/� P.M. Address 3 — Permit Lot #_� Owner n Builder The following Building Code deficiencies are required to be corrected: �— — — f r Presented to Inspector " f 1 Disapproved Date - CALL FOR REINSPECTION F-1 YES ❑ NO LERIMENSULMM INSPECTION NOTICE City of Tigard Building Department P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone639-4175 Type of Inspecti Date Reqvqsted le-1-4 J6 Time-A.M.3 Address --- Permit <k u 7. 0%ftmer Lot Buildpr The following Building Code deficiencies are required to be corrected: Presented to _ ElApproved Inspector El Disapproved Date CALL FOR REINSPECTION El YEs F1 No MIL- i INSPECTION NOTICE City of Tigard Building Department P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregor, 97223 Phone: 839-4175 i Type of Inspection - - Date Requested CL Time A"vi ._- P.M. Address _ %L .� - �— Permit Owner-- _—_ �!/Y'1 CC L�. r�C� 1' --�- -- Lot # Builder — -- The, followin wilding Code deficiencies are required to be corrected: ,fig- 't - -�-�--- -�- _-._-�-_- tn_.�' �,,,�,/L. /�_-5.,4�•� „tee-"-^ �L Presented to _ Approved Inspector --_- ❑ Disapproved Date CALL POR REINSPECTION ❑ YES CA NO S P C E APR 7 0r{.9 D E S I G N S INCOV1POFIATE [) V. E . ARCHITECTURAL INTEnIOR • LANDSCAPE )C SIGN i LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL -f-�/ NO C.��I`��j� DATE : J-40 L . .�P ROJ E C T_- ;�NOKr-IrQ �� ATTN^ ,�QLL 5 L�, Albx i"a DA#torB Please find CVfor your use PTCA; rerluc;trcl enclosed: O For review & approval ❑ Plv,yo- return COPIES [) .'E SHEET DESCRIPTION -rAcow±o 5 1 tai------- ---. oR 2A 740 REMARKS: --- ( ---- 5 !; li5_ ' Ul _��• S/�fl� _O'�/� lNGY��_��/_CSL.__�--�1��//7-�1�--.��____ �/�J.�A��L. ON6 �/�� 5 AL1"/o�p��G 8� •1 S��A1_��4r IAcoa�d... kQ ------ .._xzA�>� _�->'��i�rz wAc.�_-�•�---o��Qi�_5_Lfc�S 1st DELIVERED VIA: mil Hand Delivered Picked uie. p at Offices � oA-,41? COPIES T0: B1': fes"' 4ss nA1NIEn BLVD N IS SAr)IIAH,WA 98027 206.992.6404 re'A -09w;r II - fi�I�G fM 4of-AA WALL- I ECXs� F1�1 t9 ) 1 /�J . -l", l' 0 Ft7 - � - �'��• '-'�F I T � -_ - IL.'��0t3'A'it ��1 h u I.A'j 10►.1 Ze,00-r. veQ-r W/ i � T. pp,�t„ G�ILI►Jctr --- - 2xt> F/Ke�I A Ah, *eAtPVVLckG I ��1�"11NM1 • � ��i �r�� tIA7r JN�yXi WAJ - I ttv buret, �rld4Jli • NalClt. ,4%,&A- I'L I Pao" t,v ti o A S L t-0017, tiPAGtKIeA ¢ 'bQ'oG, �- A(�� h I LLy oQ SILL- x'1 17 h 2 - A4" WALL ., A:�lt,ol dC..A I J Gr NG .0- - 1 04 p¢AI►J ti - Sk'AhIHU; 60 Li I oq �v •,►.1G� (2) *� �s�v+.!~Ts �/�L, X V, WI{7� b�0 b �, �� :. 1 VE�1(�( '►1 a�%,F.O�c'1'�1►Jor W' -- 3 • y -- ! 4 _r `l Lo�a.�. Goof-� �, i'-dw ��•) _ TYPICAL WALL ECTION _ tAA _ 0-0 — a, 4 IA. J . i.Te#L .4 J d (i CITY M�� OREGON March 10, 1988 �— Mary Randolph 11505 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 970223 RE: Address assignment WCTM 1S) 35DA TL 1400 (portion of) It has come to my attention the address assigned the Kindercare Learning Center was incorrect. It was not obvious on our maps the address of 1150.5 SW Hall Blvd. was assigned to your home. We have reFssigned the address for Kindercare to 11.533 SW Hall Blvd. , and notified the Kindereare Learning Center Offices, local utilities, the postal service, City and the county agencies this change. We have also noted the pending demolition of the structure &L. address 11495 SW Hall and modified our records, including our address maps, to reflect this situation. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused you. If there are nny questions, please call me at 639-4171. Laura Freeman Engineering Technician/Cartographer ke/3642D 13125 SW Holl Blvd.,PO.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 - - - --- C11NOf T11FARD March 10, 1988 OREGON Don Weber 2302 Martin Street, No. 460 Irvine, CA 92715 RE: Address reassignment WC174 1S1 35DA TL 1400 (portion of) Thank ) ,u for calling to our attention the incorrect adlress assignment for the Rindercare Learning Center. on Hall Bl ,d. in Tigard, Oregon. Effective immediately, the new address assignment shah be as follows: Kindercare Learning Center 11533 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 We have notified the local utility companies, postal service, City and county agencies of this reassignment and informed them that address 11505 SW Hall + Blvd. is a single family dwelling that shall remain. Address 11495 SW Hall Blvd. will become inactive with the demolition of the structure. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office at (503) 639-4171. Laura Freeman Engineering Technician/Cartographer ke/3642D 131"r`5 SW Ball Blvd.,R'),Box 23347,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 — — ------------ C17YOF TIF•ARD CITY011'TIMARD BUILDING V"ERMIT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 09FOON NL'I' - 1,125 S.W.Hall Bivd.,P.O.Box 23397.Tigard.Oregon 97223.(503)6394175 PPIM PMT-NO Be 02941 ADDRESS : 11-505 SW FIALL all—vir) X MAP/l OT J.!:) SUH LAND USE: L T DK L-01 SIZE : "A!--UA 11:ON 5F T WORK (wI—A!,S ; DEtrJ(JL.J T 3:(IN DWELL.-UNITS I`PONT REAR: LP F T '"14'.: SINGI—L. FAM11 Y I11(alb r NO 01H..DPOOMS 1::.X'T* . WAL.1 ('-',0NTT* . *TYPE: NO . BATHS : OUX"'UP .UPP. P3 N• 5 : 1:;. W OCCUP.LOAD iAl"40T . 0I:+,N'1LW--,S W.)- sToRIES AW:.,A : HF:A:L*;*HT : 1:100F CONST : BASEMENT'? 2 N 1.*) ARE,::A PATED : 3111): OCICILM). twrv)n 111-:7ZANINF."t HASEM' T F-4 A I:`1--U0P L.OAD: CAPAGE' PLAN CHFT;K NY : k)cr HDCP. ACCES15'? c"opir? PEMAPIKFF : (It-pin clii III 11142cl all.?C1 N(J. 4,4" 0 W N K.S E Icpatrriii-ig c-ori ter M k J."I(i rv:!crjikr*nn P-T-K14MIT R P-3 0 P mairt J I-% flit PI AN PF:VTFW irviners DEPT ra C X 0 0*1 HEP N T OPMF NT (J-IAP(.;F.: R A SIX STOPM) CDIL', C)TPF.J.:T) T 0 R P RE r'.1A I D This permit is Issued subject to the regulations contained in ritle 14 TOTAL. of the TIVIC, State of Oregon Specialty Codes, zoning regulations 9 and all other applicable codes and ordinances, and It is hereby REG3�'.JY PNO• Q agreed that the work will be done in accordance with the plans and specifications and In compliance with all applicable codes and PEQUIrwim IWIPRC-14014% c-rdInances. The issuance of this permit does not waive restrictive covenants. Contractor and subcontractors shall have current city b isiness tax permits This permit will expire and become null and void if work Is not started within 180 days,or If work is Suspended or itandoned for a period of 180 days SMY time after work has co rimenced. It shall be the responsibility of the permittee to assure all equired inspections are requested and approved Permittee Signature/ Issued Ely SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FON-WORK,an"(THAIN SISMORD ABOVE 17YOFTIGrARD PEPKE'r NO. : PLE180296 CITYOFTk COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT orrr;oo�ARD TS51.11ED: R/09/OR 13125 S.W.Hall Blvd.,P.O.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223,(503)639-4175 C. PP:Em. Pm,r.NO. 88029,el 'JOB ADDRESS : 11505 SW HALL BLVD 315 TAX MAP/L.01' 5.51. DA J.400 SUB: KINDEC P AUK" 1-.ANI:) USE: I. 01, T TEM 140 NO: WONX C.LASS : NEW WA-11-A CA 05ET .1 .1 T11AP USC.: TYPE: E-DUCATIONAL LMINAL HKI*L.OW FINVISIT11 C U I Y P E VN L A V 0 1:4 AT 0 1:4 y 15 INAP PRIMFA-1l DC(.'IJP .Gpr- . E3 TUD SHOWF.:P G1l:AKA5l:z-* TRAPS DV-.MWASHEV� L)VA"IM-5AL 1. N(:) . 511.)R1:1::5 1 W(�SHA.M*., MA(',I--I'TNF,-.: I. DWELL. UNITS : LA'INDPY 144AY 011 DG) . 1'.)P A3,N 1 LYL A IFT.00P DPA 1114 6 S 1 NK 3 S F,W F*1.1 (F,T* W A I'I.::14 VlF:,.ATA:A,4 1 ! ,IOPIH/RATN IFF T' 110 MANKS FF.;'ES Ki i i cAl vii r Ga r 0 L r•i 19 C ri t r iiii. PFJ4lMJ,.T N1 P302 Mair*:Lri St . F .1. I,V i I-10 (:A 99'7:1.5 F 1:XI U 1:41r.:S 111300 00 PHONE:.' (711,411 7,1%......1 041A STA'T'E". TAX OTHFII N A T TOTAL : ,1;5 3 A a0 P'F NO T hi- permit is issued subject to the regulations contained in Title 1, ,,, th„ IMC Stat, of Oregon Specialty Codes,toning regulations DEQUIRED :INSPECI-TONS A,,,i all other applicable codes and ordinances, and it Is hereby PL.R ,UNDEPrilLAS auror I 1hil the work will be don-in accordance with the plans and r4OUGH I N ficahwis and in compliance with all applicable codes and otdinan(-es The iss ince of this permit does not waive restrictive RAIN DRAINS ,(,vpnprltq Contractor and subcontractors shall have current city S FEE W F f 4 hii,mipqr tax permits This permit will expire end become null and STOPM DPATN ,,.ml if work is not-started within 180 days,or If work is suspended or WATti.1-1 LANE ,1Ji;jr,r7nnPd Inr a period of 180 days any time after work has , , 1...ii-if-ri it shall be the responsibility of the permittee to assure PI•••0. TOPOU Y, ol! w1kittod inspnCions are requested and approved. F 1.,NAI.. rZ clk I - I'mmotop I;iqnature Ry :ALL E111141 IN5PE-117-TION 6-39--4173-- SEPARATE PERMITS REOUIRED FOR WORK OTHER THAN DESCRIBED ABOVE CITY'OF TIGA RD ! k COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Cn�- I RD 13125 S W.Hall Blvd.,P.O.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223,(503)63941175 't'..,9 p!11"T 111. PKI MIMI, 8010 911 ..)OD ADDRESS : 11.505 SW HAI L HLVD USA NUMBE-n: 3.Z4968 'TAX MAF'1/1-01 J.S1 35DA T.-elOo KTN[)F.'P (',APF I- LAND USE 1...01' s:i:zr-.:: SE ION: 'TWP: PKI";: WORK ULiE TYPE: EDLICA'T''.11(:1NAL h 0 sk F) J.eot 1-1 1, al.is 1.0011; t,0 C.c)in p-1 q WJ t 1-1 m.1 1 r•c.l:I.asw lit ri(.1 1-C,9 1.1).ia t:1.ci I I fl; I ca) 1.)11-1. i' 1.ol(.1 !`.iewer,vLgc) Ageric.y . 11.10-1 riel-Init *-xpirv.% :I.i-',!o clmi,)PA ill-cim the tintet iffillit.lati . 'The 0 In C)I I I') I: p 1:).1.(.1 W I J.:1. 1:)(+) -F I I I-f cli t V3 cI J.4' -1.It ka 1.)0 1,110.t 1F.1 X pJ.1,e 11; . J I i lo A(:I(--+ri r-.-y cl o ri:,!.i n I:)t i I n I 0.1-1 t vow t h e mce 1.11-nkr Y of then :1.OCUL t i r)11 C)'r thea fit i(I e it;owip r .1.a t 4P I-M.1 0 . 141 t 1-1 e in ewr.-t r- I m rich 1. J cjc�n t4w d at t t I-i c, m vatffi,I'l r,iri)Invi.I I t, w:[V n , t.h lre J,I-I I;;t 110.T(,-'I 1, !14 1-11!11:1. p I,a In p ac!t I T(-,icl-t, J.I I all dir,ections fl^am then distiitriv,rft Qi-vvvi . 1-F nilt vaci instmAlier, !iihilii.1,3. I:)i-1Inc!hi;LmP w. "Tap viricl t7icle allicl th*., AqcaI-Iey INS*TALL. 'TYPE: BUILDING SEWER IMFIEVIVIOUS ARE-0*4: FTX7'UI-1E UNTI'S : .1.56 NO DWELLING 1.)N11*5 1. NO. OF C•)1-DIUS W Kio-iclir.,)i, It'.3iii,e Lr,rig C.ri t r ta N E 2302 MnLrtiri St , (.,(JNNECI'X(JN CHAPGE $8,800 .00 HR T in vi i-te C.A 92-71.5 1-INE 'T'AP TNS*TALL. $45. 00 PHONE (7141) 752-1044 01 HFK14 0 N T R A O 'TUTAL : $8 B45. 00 This permit is Issued subject to the regulations contained In Title 14 NO , of the TMC. State of Oregon Specialty Codes,zoning regulations and alt other applicable codes and ordinances. and It is hereby agreed that the work will be done in accordance with the plans and specifications and in compliance with all applicable codes and ordinances The issuance of this permit does not waive restrictive covenants Contractor and subcontractors shall have current city hoginess tax permits This permit will expire and become null and void if Mork is not started within 180 days.or if work Is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days any time after work has commenced It shall be the responsibility of the permittee to assure all required inspections are requested and approved Permittee Signature Issued By (.,Al I... F0R TNSPFC'YJ(.)N SEFARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR WORK OTHER THAN DESCRIBED ABOVE CITY OF T167A RPERWIT NO. : BUG802911 CITYOFTMM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 0110*N DATE'. 1131A.)ED : 2 19/88 13125 S.W.Holl Blvd.P.O.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223,(503)6394175 I:-"RTM . PMT' ,NO. a U3 0 9-1 JOR ADDVIF"FiFi 11!50!ts !jW p . 1 VC) --- IAX MAP/1-01 L.T HK LAND LME'. : 0I SITZE' . c2-1() 000 SETBACK!'s 1--'PONT : HEAP WORK CLASS : NEW DWELL .(.)WITS : L E"l T R:r.GHT : USE: 'TYPE. : lEDl-JC()'11'0N0L. N( HF.-."DP00Wi r--:X T' WALL CONST . TYPE: N(. . BATHS : N S : W 0MUP. (,,I:IP PRDT .('A:)EN:I:N('.;G : OCCUP.LOAD N S TUIAL APEA : NO. STOAZES: 1 1ST : NO01" CONST : HEIGHT : VND - Ar-&."A FiF;:PAP'? I 2 AT F:'D BASEMENT,? 3PD : Occup . Fir-:PAP,? PATIED: MEZZANTNE"? DA SF*..M ' T F-LOOP LOAD: GAPAGE, SPPKI-1177 AI-APM7 L.ow P 1`1 DETECT`? HEAT TYPE : Pl-.'aN CREECK BY: REMARKS (.')F NO. I AST HEUSS11.11ri: F: 0 PEOM T r W N PI-AN E 1"IPE: Dr--:'I:)*r S1 A*T*I-'.' *7 6X 0 T I A r-.'I.1 C 1:*"VEI-0I*:'Mr.:'NT CHAPUE".1i 0 S UC(STORM 11 N SIX,(S'MEET) T R Put,.10 A C L F)PEJ"AID > OR TOTAL : PIECE IPT NO. This permit is Issued subject to the regulations contained in Title 14 of the TMC, State of Oregon Specialty Codes. zoning regulations and all other applicable codes and ordinances, and it is hereby agreed that the work will be done in accordance with the plans and specifications and in compliance with all applicable codes and ordinances, The Issuance of this permit does not waive restrictive covenants Contractor and subcontractors shelf have current city business tax permits This permit will expire and become null and void if work is not started within 180 days,or if work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days any time after work has commenced. It shall be the responsibility of the permittee to assure all required inspections are requested and approved, Permittee Signature Issued By: CALL FVP INSPECTION 639-4175 SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR WORK OTHER THAN DESCRIBED ABOVE . MECHAN'TCAL 'ERM11'I . 1:'-'E:PMI*Y* NO . : MEiRII30295 rCITYOA, �'T�'OF TINA RD FTWAND 9/0 0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PPTM. PM Y' .NO. 080 `.el 13125 S.W.Hall Blvd..P O.Box 23397.Tigard,Oregon 97223,(503)639-4175 'TAX MAP/L.01 .1.'.i:1. "5::'il)A 1/100 'Aff: KTINII)VA:4 CAI:16K ViK . LAND USE: ITEM: NO : NO WORK CA NEKI4 FlJPNACF.:.' <1.001< Afk HANDI-P <'.1.0 USE TYPE : kJX1CAT:1ONAI FURNACE 100K+ ATA1 HANDILA 10K VN FLOW. FIJRNA(:',F7.: F,'--XAf*- . OCCUP GPI--A. : E3 I-IEA*rE:p VEN*Y* FAN VENT' V 1::.N'T . !i Y S"!1:;'M 91-p/cOmp <311,11:11 2 HOOD 1. NO. 51'UPIES : 1. 12 :I*NC:l:N1:.;:RA1'(')N DWELL.UNITS : BL.PMOMP 15-301-11P :I:NCINFPA'T*OP ICOM FUEL TYPE GAS RLAMOMP 30 110 H I---' PEP AT F4 UNT"I""'. MAX. INPUT 60000 PLn/(*.1OMP 504444 (TTI-41i'FA 1. FIRF: DMPRS? NO F)Tl:)]*N(.-, 0IJ*TI-EA (:; 1 HIGH PRES57 NO I-ow YES PE'MARKS : Kindcar• Car-h I r-n g Cii t r P 1::, M 1''T 11111.0 .00 0 230;'? mr4l'i'111 !:111— I'l AN I:-lFV:I I.-":W $3.6 . 00 W I r v J.ri e CA 9271.5 111115A. 00 N E PHONE l 7 A 1) 15ti' :1.011/4 S VA I E 'I AX 12 0 R C 0 N T R A C T Al.. ill 3 0 RECl---:TJ*"T' NO . This perm,t 19 issued subject to the regulations contained in Title 14 REQ11.)IRED TN!-1PF'('.1,'1':I:('.)NS of the TMC, State of Oregon Specialty Codes,zoning regulations GWS I—I.NK and all other applicable codes and ordinances and It is hereby :ENSULATION agreed that the work will be done In accordance with the plans and MECHANGI... . specifications and in compliance with all applicable codes and ordinances The issuance of this permit does not waive restrictive 1-1 NAI covenants Contractor and subcontractors shall have current city business tax permits. This permit will expire and become null and void if work is not started within 180 days,or if work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days any time after work has commenced It shall be the responsibility of the permittee to av�iure all required inspections are requested and approved. Permittee Signature :'np Issued By SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR WORK OTHER THAN DESCRIBED ABOVE w w Washington County Fire District No. 1 City of Beaverton Fire Department Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District January 18, 1988 J.H. AbbuLt- GUIISLrUCLion P 0 Box 84048 s Seattle. WA 98124 Gentlemen: / 90G4-S-,-hiriia l J •1-5 S-C�t/ 1 all A fire -ind life safety plan review was conducted on the above- captioned prn,)ect for comp].iF.unce with the 1985 editions of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) , Uniform Mechanical Code (UMC), and Uniform Fire Code (UFC) as amended by Tualatin Rural Fire Protec- tion District's Ordinance 86-5, The plans, as submitted, as approved subject to the following: 1. Firestoppini;: Firestops shall be i.iistalled at 10-fout. horizontal intervals in the double-stud wall between the kitchen and nine remainder of the building. (UBC Sec. 2516(f)) 2. Occupancy Separatfon: One-hour occupancy separation is required between kitchen and remainder of the building. (UBC Sec. 503) 3. Openings in Occupancy Separations: Openings in occupancy separations shall be protected by not less than 1-hour fire resistive automatic or self-closing fire assemblies. Either the occupancy separation may extend through the attic to the roof decking or may be terminate at the ceiling line thus requiring a ceiling/roof assembly of 1-hour fire resistive construction. Please advise this department as to which method is going to be used and provide docu- mentation U.L. listings, ICBO listings, or other fire resistive assembly listings for said occupancy separation construction. (UBC Sec. 302(b)) J.R. Abbott Construction January 18, 1988 Page 2 4. Fire Alarm: Local manual fire alarm system shall be electronically self-supervising; in accordance with National Fire Protection Association Standard 72A. (UBC Sec. 809) 5. Kitchen Hood and Duct: There seems to be some confusion as to the hood and duct systems in this set of plans. Sheet A-8 requires a domestic range and range hood. Sheet M-1 requires a commercial hood referring one on to sheet M-3 which does not exist in this set of plans. This Plans Reviewer is willing to accept a domestic hood and duct over the domestic range for this type of occupancy provided cleanliness is maintained to control grease hazards. Please verify type of units to be used, if commercial equipment is installed submit plans for type I hood, duct, and its automatic protecLion system. Also, provide plans for 1-hour shaft to enclose duct between kitchen and roof. 6. Attic Access: An opening of not less than 22 'x 30 inches In size shall be provided into the attic with a clear head room in the attic of 32 inches. Attic access opening shall be located in an easily accessible area (not in storage closets ur similar spaces). Access shall he t.o each area of the attic space separated by draftstopping, 7. Attic Draftstupping: As attic draftstops pass entirely through the enclosed eaves, the extra 5/8-inch firestopping noted at the upper right hand corner of detail 1JA7 is not. needed. Also, this blocking would do little good since the soffet spice is open to the attic space. If this material is being installed for structural reasons, than before removing it, verify with the City of Tigard Build- ing Department. 8. Firestopping: In all wood-framed walls and partitions, fire- stopping consisting of 2-inch nominally-sized lun6er or other approved materials must he installed at all floor and ceiling levels. Penet.ratiuns in this prescribed firestopping to accommodate wiring, plumbing and other similar utility runs must be packed with noncombustible materials in an approved manner so as to prevent the passage of flame. (UBC Sec. 2516) 9. Insulation Flame Spread: The insulation, including breather papers and vapor barriers which are not in contact with the upper surface of the ceiling and under surface of the floor, as the case may be, must, have a flame spread rating of not to exceed 25 end a smoke development classification of not greater than 450 as measured on the Steiner Tunnel Test scale referred to as UBC Standard No. 42-1. (UBC Sec, 1713) J.R, Abbott Construction January 18, 1988 Page 3 10. Landings at Doors: There must be a floor or landing on each side of all doors. The floor or landing must not. be more than one inch lower than the threshold of the doorway unless serving access for the physically handi- capped. (UBC Sec. 3304(h)) 11 . Address Required: The tenant space number must be prom- inently displayed on the street front where it is readily visible to drivers and officers of responding fire apparatus and other emergency vehicles. (UFC Sec. 10.280) 12. Fire Extinguisher Requirements: Not lfss than one (1) approved fire ext.inguisherO with ratJ.ng of not less than 2AlOB:C shall be provided for each 3000 square feet of floor area or fraction thereof. The travel distance to nn extinguisher from any portion of the building shell riot exceed 75 feet. (UFC Standard 10-1) 13. Kitchen Fire Extinguisher: A class 40B:C shall be placed in the kitchen adjacent to the exterior door. (UFC Standard 10-1) 14. Approved Plans on Job Site: One set of approved plans bear- ing the stamps of the Tigard Building Department ant] this office must be mnintained on the project site throughout all phases of construction and must be mnde available to build- ing and fire inspectors for referet.ce during required con- struction inspections. (UBC Sec. 303) 15. Inspections Required: Inspection in(] approval of construc- tion by a representative of this office is required: (a) prior to the cover of any new framing elvinents following the installation of all utility runs which will be concealer) within wall and partition cavities; (h) upon completion of construction and prior to occupancy of the tenant space. (UBC Sec. 305) 16. Certificate of Occupancy Required: Prior to the use and occupancy of the project (space) , a certificate of occu- pancy or other written instrument of approval must be obtained from the City of Tigard Building Department. (UBC Sec. 307) uei w w ear J.R. Abbott Construction January 18, 1988 Page 4 SPECIAL NOTICE: 'JEVIATIONS FROM THE SUBMITTED AND HEREBY CONDITIONALLY-APPROVED PLANS DITIING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. EXCLUSIVE OF THOSE NECESSARY TO COMPLY WITH FIRE. SAFETY REQUIREMENTS AS LISTED HEREIN, ARE PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF THE WASHINGTON COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND THIS OFFICE. It 1 can be of any further assistance to you, please feel free to call. me at 649-8577. Sincerely, TUALATIN RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Gene Birchill Building Official SSW CC: Tigard Bldg. Dept. Inspector Ray Mr. Dan Weber Space Design, Inc. , n s � CITYC* TI ARD No. 28068 13125 S.W. HALL BLVD. P.O. BOX 23397 Date TIGARD, OR 97223 Name _ I Address Lot Block/Map Subdivislon/Address Permit M's Bldg. - Plumb�--- Cash Check Sewer Other Other Rec. By Acct. No. - —Description -- Amount i 10-432 _ Building Permit Fees _ 10-431-600 Plumbing Permit Fees 10-431.601 Mechanical Permit Fees 10.230-501 State Bldg. Tax 10-433_ Plans Check Fee 30-443 —_ Sewer Connection 30.444 Sewer Inspection 51.448 Street Syst. Dev. Charge 52-449-610 Parks I_Syst. Dev, Charge_ — — -- 52-449-620 Parks II Syst. Dev. Charge 31-450 Siorm Drainage Syst. Dev. Charge — 10.430 Business Tax — 10.434 Alarm Permit --_ ---10-227 Bail — Bail i 10-455- _ Fines - Traffic/Misd/Parking 10.2.30- _ CPTA Trafflc/Misd/Vic. Asst. - - 10.456 Indigent Defense 30-122-401 Sewer Service/USA 30.122-402 �jRwer Service/City 30% - 30-123 Sewer Sevice/City MaMaint. 30.125---- Unmatched 31-124 Storm Drainage 40.475 _ Bancroft Prin. Pymt. 40-471 Bancroft Int. Pymt. ! TOTAL "� DFPARTMENT COPY GFJO'1TOINICAL ENGINEERING EXPIDRATION AND ANALYSIS PROM—)V) KINDPR-(.1181: LEANING CfWTR Southwst. Ball Boulevaxd TIGARD, OR1110N GEA PP.wa„r C-071 108 FOR KII1171.R-4.11 E LEARNING C M ERS, 1NC. IRVINE, CALIFORNIA GILCS (ZNGINCERING SSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ,,.,, 011 AND FOUNDATIONE:NQNE:CRS TCS CNGINCCRING �SSOCIWCS. INC. CONSULTING SOIL AMD IOUPDATICNI \--,NGMECRS MILWAUKEE.WI 1200 NORTH JEFFERSON STREET-SUITE H,ANAHEIM,CA 92807/714-666-1670 LOS ANGELES,CA Decunber 23, 1.987 Kilider-Care roa.niing Center, Inc. 2302 Martin Street Suite 460 ii-vine, California 92715 Attention: Mr. Don Weber Regional Construction Manager Subject: Geotechnical Digineering Fxplorati.on and Analysis Proposed Kinder-Care 1-k-arning Center Southwest BE,!] Boulevard Tigard, Oregon MA Project No. C-871108 Deer. Mr. Weber: In accordance with your request dated Novuhher 16, 1987, a geoteclul.ical engineering exploration and analysis luzs been conducted for the atr)ve referenc^d site. 7'rarismitted herewith is one copy of the report. Conclusiom% and reconvendatinns developed from the exploration and aiialysi.s are sunaerized beicav and discussed in iinre detail. in the acc.c npanyinq repol.t. 1. At the time of our exploration, tbc- proposed site was ccmpied by an ex;.sting wood frame residence and detached garage. Mie site was relatively flat with a few large trees and locai.ized area: of ponded water. hi Existing tmdical center was located to the south of the site iuxi was somewlkit lower in grade than the site. Ehcountered soils cons-i.sted primarily of a topsoil layer on the order of one foot thick and localized regions of fill soils on the order of 2 to 3t feet. ihiderlying native soils consisted primarily of clayey silts and siltY clays with sx-usds to the depths explored. Growidwater was mi-asured in one boring at a depth of 11 feet, and basad on moisture contents of the soils, the groundmter level is expected to be on the order of 11 to 13i feet blow existing grade, at the gime of our exploration. 2. Site cpecifics development considerations include dennlition of tJie existing residence and associates] i proveimmts, reiroval of sane large trues, renoval of existing topsoil and fill. soils ranging in depths from on the order of 1 to 3 feet below the existing _grade, and mitigating the effects of the nmi.sture sensitive subgrade soils. 'These considerations are discussed in more detail in the attached report. However, all. the above considerations should be addressed in the propnscd project Way n! Proposed Kinder-Care Lc-=iny Center (� Tigard, Oregon i�Es GnGmEERmG SSOCIAtES INC GEA Project No. C-871.108 Paye 2 budgct. it should be noted that if there is an on-Rite r4-vrage disposal system, then the system should be conipletely excavated and removed fruti the site. Based on our limited surface and subsv-..face exploration, there is no evidence ( f an on-site sewage disposal system. However, one may have been constructed in an area between or beyond our exploration. 3. A coin,enti.onal Kinder-Care design consisting of shallum foundations designed for a 2,000 psf bearing pressiire may be. used o:i UAS site. Hither shallow foot 1ngs, or a nx)nolithicall.y poured footing and floor slab system may be constnic:ted for the proposed building. A conventional trash corral enclosure slab, thickelied at the periiTyApr tn support the proposed corral. wa'_l, may be used at this site. Pavements for the proposed parking lot may consist of a convent-iotkll asphalt. concrete rvivement overlying a nx-derately thick crusiv-d aggregate base, is reconmended her_ei.n. Concrete paverrnnts are reccximended in high stress areas such as in front of the trash corral and at entrwice and exits aprons for the parking lot. Site preparation for support of all. the -L-ove descrilx�d inprovements, will consist of removal of on the order of 1 to 31 feet of existing topsoil and zonnr, of fill soils. 4. Anticipated construction difficulties include the moisture sensitive subarade soils which are eypected to be expos&I after stripping the wisult:.ab1F surface soils. Site soils consistijiy primarily of silts and clays will be exposed, acid are expected to beccaiv soft and uTmnagable if they ber_crIe excessively wet. Another construction consi6eration is tlx-- c:crplete rcr.oval of the existinq residence and associated structure-,. All undprgrowid utilities and/or sewage disIx;sal systerio, should be (x-vipletely removed frcxn the site wxl capped at Uie property line, if the facilities are not to Ix? salvaged for Uie proposed construction. w �^ Proposed Kinder-Care Learning Centex C uEs GnGInEERInG �sSOClATES inc Tigard, Oregon GFA Project. No. C-871106 Page 3 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. If we may of additional assistance, should geotechiii.cal related prohlom, occur or to provide monitoring or testiaig services during Construction, please do not hesitate to contac`: us at any time. "ery Ln;::l.y yours, :BILES ENGINEERING ASSOClATFS, INC. "/ J. < ,'e`ems Paul. J. Giese, E.T.T. Staff Mgineer Tru-rias C. Benson, Jr. Dranch Manaaer Anaheim, Czdifornia Jeffrey S. Miller, P.F. Principal Diginr _ ter.,,"•.'..—^ ..�� Terry L. Giles, F.E. President RPI: No. 13554 Encl: GEA Report No. C-67.110$ cc: Kinder-Care learning Centers, Inc. Attn: Mr Jerry Wendling (4) Mr. James R. Kent (1) 'ICB/psl CA4 GEOITUINICAL LMINEERING za,�P11"WURV AND ANALYSIS PROPOSED KINDEM-CARE IFAl2 ING C,EMIR Soutinvest Hall Boulevard TIGAkD, ORFMON GEA PRCUBCT NO. C-871108 IN IR(A)WPlON The scope of services for this project iltcluded a site reconnaissance, subsurface exploration, field and laboratory testing, and geotechnical engireeii.ng analysis to provide crituri. for preparing the buildincs and trash corral foundations and slabs-on-grade and paven*--nt de-sign for the proposed developmment. SIAL /N) PROJWI' DESCRIPTION The proposed site consists of an existing residential l-ot_ lo(-,it(cl west of Ek)uthwest Hall_ Boulevard (County Poad 997) in Tigard, Oregcm. At the tune of our Exploration the rectEutgular parcel was occupied by vi existing wood franc residence and separate garage. A gravel road nuts east-west through the site. There are several large deciduous trees on site, with most of the site surface covered wit3i occasionally maintained grass. The site is relatively flat but is on the order of 3 to 5± feet higher in elevation than an existing nrdical center to the smith of the si*-e, and the site is on the order of 1 foot hiyher than the adjacent Soui-hvrst Hall Boulevard. Surrounding topography is Yelatively flat. The proposed building is ttnderst(x)l to consist of a single-story masonry and/or wood frame structure with exterior dimensions of al-4iroximately 107 by 59 fent. No basement is planned for the building. This structure will Ex- supported by exterior. lx-�aring WFAII.s with a clear span interior. T},pical noxiff m gall loads are estimated to he in the ranqe of two to three kips per foot of load bearing wall. Thr. floor slab is assumed to carry a maximun design live load of (00 psf.. For design purposes, the pavement is assorted to be subjecteu to 7.00 light vehicles raid five egaivalent 18,000 pow-od s-ngIP axle loads i:rm heavy trucks per day. A ten year analysis period is used for design. The plasuied floor elevation was not available at the tion of this reix)rt. However, considering the existing topography, drainage requirmnents, and adjacent devel.olittents, a finished floor (F.F.) El.. 100.01 feet ims been asscatted for the purposes of. UL report, but may be lower if a cmbinat.ion of cut and fill placement is performed to achieve a level buildinq pad. Existing grades in the proposed building location presently range fr(xn �-LYx)ut elevation 97.0 to 1.00.0± feet. Thereforo, only ncminal grading is anticipated in the building and parking areas, depending on site preparation requirements. Proposed Kinsler-Care Learning Center Tigard, Oregon GFA Project: No. r-871106 Page 2 FIELD E:>j ORATM%1 AND LABORATORY TFSTING Five soil test borings were drilled for this project, to depths .ranging fr m 5 to 15 feet below existing grade. Three of these were located in the proposed building area to a depth of 15 feet. The remaining two borings were located in the proposed parking lot portions of the property and were terminated at depths of five feet. Borings wen, backfilled upon canpletion of drilling and sampling. A copy of the test boring logs (Record of Subsurface Exploration) acid Boring 'Location Ph-in, Figure 1, are enclosed in the Appendix. Elevations shown on the test boring logs were obtained by conventional hand-leveling tecimiques referenced to the benchmark indicated on the Boring Location Plan, Figure 1, and are considered accurate to the nearest 1.0t foot. Soil parameters indicating the engineering characteristics of the materials encountered in the test borings, as determined by the field and laboratory testing, are presented on the logs with the terms vmd symbols defined on the General Notes enclosed on the last page of the Appendix. Field and laboratory testing was performed in general accordance with ASTM and other applicable specifications. SUBSURFACE CODIDI'1'IONS Soils encountered in the subsurface exploration include approximately on the order of. 1 foot of topsoil consisting of dart: brown clayey silt with organic matter in most of ths. borings. However, Loring No. 3 penetrated a 6± inch thick layer of black 3/4-inch uniform, anctmlar gravel in the existing drivLAray for the existing residence. Fill soils were encountered in Borings Nos. l and 3 to depths on the order of 2 to 3± feet below the existi.nq grade. Fill soils (Y-.nsisted primarily of brown and light brown fine sandy -ilt or silty fine sand, with occasional traces of clay. Underlying they surface deposits of topsoil and fill soil, native brown clayey silt arcd fine sandy silt was encountered in all five borings and was encountered to depths ranging from 11 to 13± fee+: below existing grade in the deeper borings. Underlying the silt deposits, a }-)irxan silty clay wit_lm traces of fine sand was encountered to the depths explored. Fill soils and shallow native soils to depths on the order of 2h feet below existing grade were Judged to be medium stiff basad upon the field and laboratory testing. Underlying native silts and clays were stiff to very stiff in axmparative consistency. Free water was measured at a depth of 11 feet below the existing grade in Boring No. 3, upon completion of drilling. Although free water was not enornintered in bring Nos. 1 find 2, sampled soils obtained from these borings at depths greater thEu-m 11 to 13 feet below existing grade were very wet. Since the subsoils have a high clay and silt content and are therefore relatively impervious, it is unlikely that free water would accumulate in these explorations during a t.ijm perisxt less Ilion on Proposed Kinder-Care Learning Center Tigard, Oregon uFA Project No. C-871108 Page 3 the order of a few days. However, based upon the moisture contents of the sampled soils and the encountered groundwater level In Boring No. 3, the hydrostatic water level was considered to be at a depth of about 11 to 13t feet below existing grade, at the time of this exploration. The water table should, however, be anticipated to fluctuate somewhat with varying precipitation, and surface runoff. The site may also by subject to a relatively shallow perched grater table where surface water is trapped within the upper more pea-vious layers where underlain by nare inpervious strata. The alxrve describ(xl subsurface conditions have been simplified for Huse of report interpretation. A more detailed description of the subsurface conditions at t).,e test tx)ring locations are described on ttxn test baring logs enclosed in the Appendix. CCVCIkJSIONS AND RLC U AA1WATIONS The conditions imposed by the proposed building, trash corral, Find pavements have been evaluat"'I on the basis of the enq.i nfN-ring characteristics of the subsurface materials encountered in the trrings and their anticipated behavior both during and after. construction. Conclusions and recx me.ndations for building and trash corral foundations and slabs-on-grade, and pavement design alonq with constniction considerations rind site preparation recliAreMents are discussed in the following sections of this report. Also, a general discussion of site seisrtdcity is provided. Sedrinic Design Considerations As depicted on Figu-p No. 1 in Chapter 23 of the, Uniform Building Code (UBC) , nortliern Oregon is within a zone 11 seismic risk area. Moderate damage corresponding to Modifier] W-realli Intensity VII should be -.anticipated for this region. Structural design in accordance with the Uniform Building Code considering this zone II classification is recommended. It should be noted that much of the remainder of the west coast is classified as 7tone 11I or zone IV where higher levels of ground shaking and corresponding structural damage are anticipated. Primarily silty and clayey soils were encountered in this sid)surface. exploration. Dura to the cohesive nature of these soils the em ountered clays and silts are riot expected to be susceptible to liquefaction. Therefore, a specific seismic design with respect to liquefaction is not considered warrwite-d for this project. A site specific seismic risk evaluation for this site is considered outside of the scope of this foundation study. However, a seismic risk Proposed Kinder-Care Learning Center Tigard, Oregon 033 Project No. C-871108 Page 4 evaluation can be performed by Giles Engineering Ass(x:iates, Inc. (GFA) , qx)r► request. Site Develo nt Considerations A primary site development consideration is the crmplete demolition and removal of the existing residence and associated structures anc3 facilities. The existing residence appears to be located in the proposed paflking area, while the existing garage appears to be located in proposed Kinder-Care building area. Some large trees have to be remnved to make rcxm for the proposed developrmnts. A surface layer of topsoil on the order of 12± inches thick should be removed frau building, slab, and pav(ment areas. Existing driveway surfac-s and widerlyi.ng fill materials should also be excavated and removed frcxm the proposed deve nImrent areas. At the time of exploration, ponded water was noticed adjacent to the existing driveway. Adequate site drainage should he provided during and after construction to reduce the potential for problems associated with moisture sensitive silts and clays. However, care should lx-- taken not to divert water into the adjacent lower lying dei alopment to the south. Site grading should )*-- performed such that ponding on site does not occur, acid grade should be sloped such that non-erosive uniform drainage away frau buildings and pavraents is provided. The project budgrt should consider these site specific development costs including dmolition, possible tree removal, near surface soil ranoval, and sits drainage irrprovements. Subsoils encountered at the test horing locations are considered ix) exhibit moderate strengths and are considered suitable for use with a conventioni--il shallow foundation system, especially for the relatively low structural loads imposed by the proposed devol.orrr-nt. Therefore, the most economical foundation system for the proposed structure is considered to consist of conventional spread footings or a turned-dcxv►,/thiekeru�--d slab desi(rued for a moderate nPowable soil bearing capacity, supported on suitable existing natural soil anti/or newly placed cccp-Acted fill used to raise low area, and replace any unsuitable existing soils where encountered. The floor slab may be designed as a conventional slab-on-grade, and bhould also be supported on suit-able bearing existing natural soils and/or thickened slab foundations. Standard Kinder-Cara plans and S'apNCiflCai 1Ur13 (2.000 psf) )wring capacity maybe used 'Che existing soils are considered to be moderately to highly rmisture and disturbance sensitive. Therefore, problems may be encountered particularly if construction proceeds during wet weather. The sew!rity of the construction problems will be dependent in part on the time of year that construction proceeds, and on precautions exercised to protect the sensiti,�e soils. Proposed Kinder-Care Learning Center Tigard, Oregon GRA Project No. C-871108 Page 5 Site Preparation Requirements Prior to the start of construction, the existing residence, garage, and associated improvements should be demolished and all rubble shrnjld be suitably disporA of off-site. All existing utilities which Eire not to be salvao-,A should be cenpletely reroved and permanently and adequately capped at the property l:i.t►e, or rerouted as required. It is not known if the existing residence has an on-site sE+wage disposal. system such as a septic tank and connected tile field. If such facilities Exist on site, t1-*iy should be ccupletely excavated and removed from the site along with adjacent unsuitable bearing soils. Site preparation tl=ughout the proposed building and pavemnt areas will require removal of unsuitable soils along with all surface vegetation including trees, organic soil, or other unsuitable materials These soils were found to lx-- al-lout 12± inches in thickness at the test boring locations, but may extend to deeper depths in localized pockets that were not detected durijig the subsurface exploration program. Following ren-oval operations, the subgrade should be pronfrolled to detect soft, yielding soils which must be rEimwe'd. Subsequent to proofrolling, the subgrade should be scarified to a depth of at least 6 to 8± inches and recmpacted in accordance with the enclosed specifications. Low areas and excavations may them be raisrxi to the planned finished grade witli ecnpacted fill. Site preparation should be performed in accordance with the specifications enclosed in the Aplxxrxiix of this report (Modified Prmtor Procedures) . Due to the moisture and cb sturbanre sensitivity of the existing soils, special care should be utilized in maintaining positive drainage from the property to reduce the potential for excessive moisture infiltration as a result of precipitation during construction. Foundation Design Parameters Aftcx Proper subgrade and site preparation, the proposed building may be supported by conventional spread footings or a turned down/tlu.ckened slab founded at the typical exixedment depth below the planned floor elevation and exterior grades and founded at least one foot into suitable existing natural., undisturbed soil and/or wiilu.n a structural ourpacted fill continuous from a suitable existing natural soil subgrade used to raise the site to the planned finished grade and/or replace unsuitable portions of the existing soil. The foundations may be devigned for a maximum, net, allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,000 psf. Convention.-il reinforcing in the. forting pads is considered adequate, and a minimum strip footing or thickened section width of 12 inches is rec trended for proper strength development. Proposed Kinder-Care Learning Center Tigard, Oreclon GEA Project No. C-871108 Page 6 Trench footings nay also lx used providing the excavation s�des are stable and the local building codE: pe+emits their use. The standard Binder-Care foundation plans and �;I-*--c:ifications indicating a ncxninal 2,OO9 _2sf soil pressure and utilizing c.itliqr conventional spreadfootingsor a turned down/thickened sl��l� eystem n�.Y therefore be used on Qiis site with proper cal.e during construction. Suitable soils for support of the standard Kinder-Care 2,000 psf soil pressure or as the structural fill subg.rade nnist have at least a stiff ccxnparative consistency (average qu greater than or equal to 1.0 tsf) for cohesive soils or a fimn relative density (N value greater Ulan or equal to 10) for granular soils. Suitable lx--aring existing natural soils appear to be avai.lM.)1e at a depth of about 1 to 31 feet belcm the existi_rig ground surface in the planned building area. HowFvc�)-, considering the potential varied)ility and Omtreme nUi-sture and disturbance sensitivity of the subsoils, tl-e foundation bearing grade nest be evaluated and approved by a qualified geotechnical engineer during construction so that foundatioils are supported by suitable bearing sails and will perfonu as intended. Jf unsuitable soils are encountered at the planned lx-aring grade elevation, they should be reimmed to a siiitable bearing subgrade and the excavation }x-irY.filled with stnirtural fill to develop a unifor7ii bearing grade. OtherwiF-.o, foundations may be E-attended by thickening or stepping the fcx,tiiig pad. A11 fill used for foundation support mist Le placed and ccxrl)acted under erigineerin,j. controlled conditions in accordance with the enClose.d specifications and should be continuous from a suitable existing natural. soil subgrade and additionally continuous t1iroughouL the fni-mckition influence zone_ as defined by the enclosed specifinations (Item No. 3, 0.5 horizontal to 1 vertical) . The local building code :is i.inderstocxl to require a minirmnn ;2.-inch foundation enbrdient depth. However, it is recoimended that fo-x)t.ings be founded at least 18 inches kx-�low exterior grade, except for foundations adjacent to planter areas where they should be extended to at least 24 inches to reduce the potential for bearing soil deterioration as a result of landscape moisture softenitig. All foundations must be protected frati weati.er damage during and after construction. Post construction total and differential settlements of a shallow foundation system designed and constructed in accordance with UN-- enclosed heenclosed recomrenlations are estimated to be less than 1 .0 mid 0.5 inches, rest*-r-tively, which is �_olssidered within tolerab]v limits for the proposed st ruct�lxe. Proposed Kindrr-Care Learning Center Tig arc], Oregon GPA Project No. C-871108 Page 7 Floor Slab Design Parameters Aft.cr the site has been prepared in accordance with the work recanmended :in the Site Pref ration - renx'rit s section of this relx)rt, and the foundation or ot)ner excavations backfill-ed with structural fill in accordance with the enclosed specifications, the floor mTy Ye designed as a conventional 4 inch thick slab--on-grade supported by suitable bearing existing soils and/or conpacted structural fill used to raise the site or to replace w►suitable existing soils. The floor slab should be suitably reinforced and supported by a typical 4 to 6 inch compacted granular base placed on a suitably prepared existing soil suhgrade. A polyvinyl sheet should be placed immediately below Cie floor slab to serve as a vapor barrier. if the materials underlying the polyvinyl sheet contain sharp, angular particles, a cushion layer of sand approximately ?. inches thick should be provided to protect it from pwicture. if desired, the slab may be poured monalithically with the perimeter foundations, thickened for wall. suprport, or poured structurally isolated from footings. With proper site preparation and evaluation, the post-constTlirtion total and differential_ settlement- of the floor slab structurally isolated from footings and constructed as recYnTrended is estimated to) L-P less than 0.5 and 0.3 inches, respectively, which is considercKt w.1 thin tolerc6le limits for the proposed structurr. Slabs rcurod nrnolithically with footings are expected to settle similnr to the estimates presented in the above foundationDesign Parcux2ters section. The standard Kinder-Care slab-on•-c rade fl(-x)r is therefore consic -ri;d sun a for use on this site with proper subgrade �re�arati.on. Trash Cbrral Design Paranx:ters The proposed trash corral is understood to be situated in the soutivest corner of the parking lot in the vicinity of Boring No. 5. The soils encountered at: `fest Boring No. 5 generally conform with these encountered at the remaining boring locations and conri.st of a thin mantle of low organic content topsoil underlain by a moderate :strength clayey siltto at least 5 feet] similar to the soils encountered elsewhere across the property. Ttx� trash corral is understood to consist of a wooden fence or chain link type fence enclosure, or a masonry block type open structure. The trash enclosure is very light and therefore, a convent_io,.e.l Learing capacity analysis is not considered to be appAcable for the proposed foundations. The trash corral will. however be mrhJect to i.mpkact loads • MR&JIffwt Proposed Kinder-Care Learning Center Tigard, Gregon GEA Project No. C-871108 Page 8 imposed by trash removal equipment and will be required to support U-io fence or masonry block type enclosure walls. The most economical and appropriate foundation system for tine proposed trash corral is considered to consist of a Portland Cement concrete slid) thickened around the perimeter for wall support. The interior concrete pad should be typically a mininnwn of six inches in thickness �-nmd the perimeter edges thickened to at least 1? inches in thi.claress and 12 inches in v,"dth. The c mcrete slab should also be underlain by a mirninnnm 4 to 6 inch caq-,acte l granular base. The existing natural soil is considered s»itable for support of the trash enclosure after proper subgrade preparation including p.roofrolling, scarification, and recampaction as required by the enclosed specifications. Concrete should consist of an air-entrairw-d Portland Cement mi.:cture with a proper water-cement ratio for both strength and finishing considerations. Reinforc%Fie:►t may typically consist of heavy wire mesh (6X6-6/6 VMM) throughout the interior of the pad and four No. 5 rebars (tw) top and two bottom) continuous around the perimeter within the thickened section. The thickened section should also extend at least 12 inches below the .finished exterior grade. All Portland Cem-nt concrete should consist of materials and be placed in accordance with Oregon State 1lig1way Specifications Section 450. Pavement Design Parameters Sul- rade preparation should be performed as described in the Site Pre v-ation Requirements section of this report. lifter proper subgracTP preparation, the exposed materials are anticipated to consist of a clayey silt or Gandy silt and are, therefore, anticipated to exhibit pavement support characteristics equivalent to R-values ranging frau 25 to 50 based on the Unified Soil Classification of Mir4M to f3M. The p:.►venrnt design has, therefore, been based on an estimated 11-value of 25. it should, however be recognized that the city/county may require a specific R-value test to verify the support characteristics of the subsoils in order to allow for the followinq design to he used. Alternatively, the city/county may require that a minimum cxAe pavement section be used if a specific R-value or 03R test is not pe.rfonmecl. In accordance with the specifications enclosed in the 4)pendix of this report, it should be noted that the, .r portion of the new pavrinen►t subgrade should be catpacted to a higher in-situ-den density the underlying materials for proper_pave iiia suMrrt. HcAw.%ver, extreme caution should be utilized to prepiire the snnbgrade. if the soils are wet, sun atte%it to compact the soils may rexluce rather than improve subgrade conditions. The soils consultant should, tl►erefore, be contacted for alternate if the subgrade soils are wet at the time of site preparation. Proposed Kinder-Care Darning Center. Tigard, Oregon GSA Project No. C-871108 Page 9 The following table is presented to indicate tlrc thickness of a reccmnanded conventional asphaltic concrete pavement. The cable includes appropriate state highway specifications to ensure that proper materials and placement procedures are use. Pavement Section Or(xjon State Materials Thickness (inches) Highway Specifications Asphaltic Concrete 1 * Section JQ3, Surface Course Class C Asphaltic Concrete 1' * Section $93, Birder. Course Class B Crushed Surfacing 6 Section 305 Base Course * if the surface and binder course consist of sinular materl.n.l.s, they may be placed as a single 2� inch lift, rather than two individual layers. ** Camaction Per Section 403.45b. Pavement recxvnendations assumt� proper drainace, construction monitoring and testing and are based on AASHIM design parameters for a ten year desicyn period. Aaeas of the site which will be subje_ctf-d to relatively high vehicular stresses should be paved with a Portland Cement concrete pavement similar to that reccumEnded for the trash corral areas. Areas which are considered to be subject to high stresses and which will benefit frau a Tk)rtl.and Cenpnt concrete pavement typically include about a 10 }: 30 foot pad in front of the trash corral, and the parking lot entrance/exit aprons. Concrete pavements should be constricted in accordance witli the Oregon State Highway Specifications, under Section 450. Construction and Other Design Considerations Existing structures are present on the prcT-osed site. A portion of the existing structures extend into both the plani� building and pavement areas. Caution should be errrcised during constriction to erasure that all portions of the existing structures along with the any associated unsuitable soils are properly removed and the excavations backfillrrl with a structural ccmp<acted fill. Portions of the existing st::nuctures in addition to those indicated on Figure 1 where encountered during construction should be handled in a similar manner t►nd should also be brcnyght to tlxi soils consultants attention to enri.ire that tht!y Proposed Kinder-Care Learning Center Tigard, Oregon GEA Project No. C-871108 Page 10 do not alter the concl»si.ons and reczmnendations contained herein. Construction problems associated with the removal of the existing strictures including foundations, floor slams, and undergrctuvd utilities may therefore be encountered on this site. The *crater table at the time of the exploration was considered to be at a depth of about 11 to 13± feet below the existing ground surface. Water levels niy however rise sanewhat with precipitation and Surface runoff.. Therefore, some dewatering may be required. Conventional sump pumps placed within pits in the bottom of excavations are iuiticipated to be suitable for anticipated shallow excavation dewatering. Foundation excavation and general site stripping will expose generally clay arK1/or silt soils which are considered to be moisttue and disturbance sensitive. Tleese soils nkly increase in settlenant characteristics if disturbed or if pEirmi.tted to erode and/or soften as a result of exposure to free moisture. The site should, therefore, be graded to prevent ponding, and surface water from running into excavations. Foundations and floor slab concrete should be poured as soon as possible after excavation with all trenches backfilled immediately after the concrete has set up. Softened, eroded, or excessively tit soils should be dri.cxl and reccclkacted and/or removed and replaced with a structural fill that. has been placed and cxvTkacted Ili accordance with the enclosed specifications. on-site soils may be reused as structural compacted fill for foundation, floor slab, and pave .nt support provided they do not contain significant orgaxiic, cobbles, boulders, or other deleterious content. Due to the high clay and/or silt content, some problems rn<-iy be encountered, especially if construction is carrifKl out during wet periods. Increases in the natural. moisture content will result in difficulties with canpaction. Due to the sensitive character of the soils, utilization of a coarse granular backfill may be desirable and will reduce moisture-related problem especially if construction is carried out during wet periods. Development of the proposed site entails scarce soil and foundation oriented problems especial]} as it relates to the sensitivity of the subsoils to both moisture and disturbance. Excavation problemns may also be encountered on the proposed site as a result of both the caving of potentially unstable soils and the relatively shallow water table creating potential revere excavation prublens where construction extends below the water level. Recarmendations presented in this report are predicates upon site preparation, foundation, floor slab, and pavement construction performed under the direction of the geotechnical consultant. EL ProposedKinder-i are Learnijig Center Tigard, Oregon GEA Project No. C-•871108 Page 11 GENFML COMMTS The soil samples obtained during the subsurface exploration will Lx.. retained for period of 30 days. If no instructions are received, they will be disposed of at that time.. This report has been preRrired to aid evaluation of this property anci to assAt the architects and engineers in the structural design. It is intended for use %jith regard to the specific project discussed herein ,uid any substantial chwigc-s in the building, loads, locations, or assured grades should be brought to the attention of. Giles Fhqlneering AGsoriates, Inc. (GFA) so that a determination of how such changes may attect these conclusions and recuirrendations can be made. The analysis of t.li.i.s site was hosed on a subsoil profile interpolated frcni a limited subsurfaces exploration. If the actual conditions encountered during construction vary frrnn those indirrited by the borings, GEA must be contacted buTiediately to determine if Lhe conditions alter these recramiendations. The conclusions and rerxxiimendat.ions prosetited in this report haus, been promulgated in acoordance with generally accepted professiutkil engijaeeri.ng practice in Ute field of geotechnical engineering. APPENDIX The boring logs and related informa- tion enclosed in the appendix depict subsurface conditions only at the specific locations drilled and at the particular times designated on `he logs.Soil conditions at other locations may differ from conditions occurring at these boring locations. Also the passage of time may result in a change in the soil conditions at the boring locations drilled. SPECIFICATIONS FOR SUBGRADE AND GRADE PREPARATION FOR FILL,FOUNDATIONS, FLOOR SLABS, AND PAVEMENT SUPPORT; AND SELECTION, PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION or <ILL SOILS USING MODIFIED PROCTOR PROCEDURES GIES CnGrnEERING (�SSOCIWC'S inc 1. Inspection and testing of subgrades and grades for fill, foundation, floor slab and pavement; and fill selection, placement and compaction shall be performed under the supervision of ar exper- ienced soils engineer. 2. All subgrades and grades shall consist of and be (a) underlain by suitable bearing material,(b)free of all organic, frozen, or other deleterious material,and(c) inspected and approved by qualified engineering personnel under the supervision of an experienced soils engineer.Preparation of subgrades after stripping vegetation, organic or other unsuitable materials shall consist of (a) proof-rolling to detect soft, wet, yielding soils or other unstable materials that must be undercut, (b) scarifying top 6 to 8 inches, and (c) recompaction to sarne minimum in-situ density required For similar materials indicated under item 5. Note: Compaction requirements for pavement subgrade higher thdn other areas. 3. In undercut and fill areas, tie compacted fill must extend (a) a minimum 1 foot beyond the edge of the foundation or pavement at grade and down to compacted fill subgrade on a maximum 2(V):1(H) slope, (b) 1 foot above footing grade outside the building, and (c) to floor subgrade inside the building. Fill shall be placed and compacted on a maximum 1(V):5(H) slope or must be stepped or benched as required to flatten if not specifically approved by qualified personnel under the direction of an experienced soils engineer. 4. The compacted fill materials shall be free of deleterious, organic or frozen matter, and shall have a maximum L.igWd Limit (ASTM D-423) and Plasticity Index (ASTM D-424) of 30 and 10, respectively, unless specifically tested and found to have low expansive properties and approved by an experienced soils engineer. The top 12 inches of compacted fill should have a maximum 3 inch particle diameter and all underlyirg compacted fill a maximum 6 inch diameter unless specifically approved by an experienced soils engineer. All fill material must be tested and approved under the direction and supervisior of an experienced soils engineer prior to placement. If the fill is to provide non-frost susceptible characteristics, it must be classified as a clean GW, GP, SW or SP per Unified Soil Classi- fication Systern (ASTM D-2487). 5. The density of the structural compacted fill and scarified subgrade and grades shall not be less than 90 and 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by Modified Proctor (ASTM D-1557) for collesive and granular materials, respectively, with the exception of the top 12 inches of pavement subgrade which shall have a minimum in-situ density of 95 and 100 percent of maximum dry density for cohesive and granular soils, respectively, or 5 percent higher than underlying fill materials. The moisture content of cohesive soil shall not vary by more than -1 to +3 percent and granular soil ±3 percent of optimum when placed and compacted or r2compacted. The fill shall be placed in layers with a maximum loose thickness of 8 inches for foundations and 10 inches for floor slabs and pavements unless specifically approved by a qualified soils engineer taking into consideration the type of materials and compaction equipment being used. The compaction equipment must be approved by personnel under the direction of a qualified soils engineer who is also performing the inspection of fill placement and compaction to ensure that it is suitable for the type of materials being compacted. Under no circumstances may bulldozers or similar tracked vehicles be used for compaction equipment. 6. Excavation, filling, subgrade and grade preparation shall be performed in a manner and sequence that will provide drainage at all times and proper control of erosion. Precipitation, springs, and seepage water encountered shall be pumped or drained to provide a suitable working platform. Springs or water seepage encountered during grading/foundation construction must be called to the soil en gineer's attention immediately, for possible revision or inclusion of an underdrain system. 7. Nonstructural fill adjacent to structural fill shall be pieced in unison to provide lateral support. Barkfill along building walls must be placed and compacted with care to ensure excessive unbalanced lateral pressures do riot develop. The type of fill material placed adjacent to below grade walls (i.e. hasement walls end retaining walls) must be properly tested and approved by an experienced soils engineer with consideration for the lateral earth pressure used in the wall design. w w ao 4 SOUTHWEST HALL BOULEVARD Q •'A •rq >' o v � t, .b ° U .4 N ° 35' u a •r+ w -_ 4-1 14-4 a � I PROPOSED_ 40I o ro •� ° w u .° . PARKING H N o L U y J EXISTING HOME �* > m 4J Gro w i' j i W w aGJ Ui o �� m 1 U ° •H fd •r1 4J o bo' ww w ►4 Q. a) > I (, I a °�' a EXISTING GARAGE' 05 y Ca a, ~ �- � 50 U Lr) 7 Ca W I aC, n ILa I C7 H En 45' H .Aa U U I H P::Dq I � oQ ! _� i __ _ _T 251+ I I Appromimate Scale: 1" m40' FIGURE 1 BORING LOCATION PLAN Proposed Kinder-Care Q Southwest Hall Boulevard ILES CIYGINECRING I JSSOCIATES,INC TIGARD, OREGON GEA Project No. C-871108 CONSIItTING SOIL AND FOUNDMION NGINEERS e. ELMLAMELmERA RECORD OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION BORING NO. GEA PROJECT NO. 1 (Bui ng rea) _ ___C-811108 t DATE FIELD nEpnESENTATIVE ILES CNG1110ERING SSQCIIIIES,lrJC. 12/6/87 Richard Ashman PROJECT' CONSULTING C SOIL AND IOUND411011 CI1GNCIZItS Proposed Kinder--Care, Southwest hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon DESCRIPTION Depth Sample Ground Surface Elevation Below No. I qu yp qa W REMARKS 100.�± f t Surface Type _ NOTE A _ _ � __ _1-AU -- � - ILLe }}�'own fi a Sandy SiltTiilty_ 2-SS 6 23 .f i,�We`Ssttt� __. . -Brown Clayey Silt, trace of fine 1,1,=li I Sand , 3-SS 19 4.5+ 18 1'1.= 9 4-SS 18 1 .7 3.0 23 - 5-SS 10 1 ..' I.5 Brown Silty (Clay, trace�of^fine Sand -- —' 6-55 11 2. 1 2.0 0•8` 44 Boring Terminated at 15' No Free Water Encountered . Caving to 9.8' 7U, NOTE A: Dark Brown Clayey Silt, with Organics (TOPSOIL) ?U' 35' 4U' I V Water encountered at ____ ft. whilo drillinll ( -I I V Water at- _ -_. ft. at completion V Waley at _. ft. after __hours 45 t - Clldnyl c of sli.11c iolhc,llell Ily Ilu- Illli'S 11'. .Ilgnoximale Innnnl.uy helwelm soil lylles. I Ile acLtull It"'1111m may he qla lual.md m ly J'al y coni,lotably Ilelweell hulim;locations. Leashed lines should he utterineled as mole altlnoxuname than solid hnrc, RECORD OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION e � BORING NO. GEA P;IUJECT NO. 2 (BuildingArea) ('-871108 .- DATE —_. u---- •----�-- FIELD REPRESENTATIVE `�JILES CNCINCERIf1G HSSOCIAteS,(ftC. _ 12/7/87 _Richard Ashman PROJECT _ CONSULTING SOIL AND IOUNV'AllOn t'NUf1C: M Proposed Kinder-Care, Southwest Hall. Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon DESCRIPTION —Depth Sample G,ound Surface Elevation Below No.& N qu qp qe W REMARKS 98.0= ft Surface "type NOTE A 1-AU— -- - -- - Brown Clayey Silt 1.1:-34 2-SS 7 2.0 24 PI- 9 5' 3-SS 22 3. 5 4.5+ 17 Brown fine Saniy Silt -- 4-SS 14 3.0 20 _ 10' 5-SS 11 2.5 20 Brown Silty Gray, tree's ofl.ne �. 1 - Sand l5' 6- S 10 2.3 2.0 38 - Boring Terminated at 151 _ No Free Water Encountered Caving to 11 ' 20' NOTE A: Dark Brown Clayey Silt, with Organics (TOPSOIL) I 25' 30' 35' 40' V Water encountered at ft. While drilling — 0 Plater at____1t. at completion Water at ft. after —hours Irl l:h,nnp s of glal,t inllir,llerl ley If pt liars ,tie al,lnoxiniale hounrlaty helwelrn soil lypes. Uv aclual Itaosilion nlav 11n lot atJu.it "„1 ni.1v v,n y rot sltlrrahly Uetwerell I►e"Illy Imialfio,, U,lslrl.tl lines shouild be inllnlnelrtl its lJovie al,Wroxintale Ihan cuhti 110113. RECORD OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION BORING NO GFA PROJECT NO. �� c-s71 Cos uFs \nGlneFautG 3 (Buildin Area) _ G ( iSSOCIATE5,MC. t DATE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE 12/7/87 Richard Ashman __-_ _ � � CorISUITOG SOIL AND IOUI1D0.I1011 {1GIIIE CIIS PROJECT Pro osed Kinder-Care, Southwest hall Blvd. , Tigard, Oregon - - - 1 -- - -- —- 1 Dnptll Sarntrld __ DESCRIPTION ( Below No.& N q„ yp q, W REMARKS Ground Surface Elevation 97.0± ft Surface Type ___--- --- r1ur��----- --- _ 1-Au =- FILL: Brown Silt, t0 Light Brow Clay Sandy Brown fine Sandy Silt, trace off1/8" - 3_53 26 4.�i{ 20diameter and smaller roots at 4 �� -4-SS 13 2. 1 2.0 27 10' _ 5-SS 11 1 .3 2.0 26 -r Chown Silt~ y,C�aY, trace o dine -Sand -_ 16 SS 10 1 .0 30 -Boring Terminated at 15' - Caving To 11.5' 111, -NOTE A: 6 inches of Black 3/4" - angular, Uniform Gravel (crushed rock) 25' . i 3U' V Water encoun•ered of ft.while drilling I — 0 Water at._____it. at camplr.:ion _ ♦ Water at_._ ft.of ter ... -_—Hours as nrw nl sl—i+ti t Itnhc.tfrnl by Ih$r lirn s tort al'lnnxinc niunil,iiy hf!lwecn still types. Th Ch.0r artunl Itnnsiifnn ropy hr 9101111,11 anti may vary cnnsiclerably between,boring locations. Dashed hoes shu"h1 he intrtptuletl mote approximate than snhrl hers. RECORD OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION BORING NO. GEA PROJECT NO. 4 ___ C-871.108 Q DATE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE GII£S CNGINCE.RING ( )SSOCIAIES,IIYC. _ 12/6/87 _ Ni.chard Ashman (� PROJECT CONSWING JOIL AND IOUNDWION CNG111EElt5 Proposed Kinder.-Care, Southwest hall Blvd. , ,__TTigard, Oregon DESCRIPTIOND"11111Sample -- —1 -� '� --- A-- 8elnw No.& N (� t:( Qs w REMARKS Ground Surface Elevation t)8.0± f t Surface Type P VOTE n __ ---- - 1-Au -- - - - B1own to Dark Brown Clayey 51t, -trzre of fine Sand --2-S;; 7 1 .5 0.6 7.4 51 - 3-SS= -_14 2.3 2.2 1.1 \-,1 - Boring Terminated at 5' - -No Groundwater Encountered Caving to 3.5' 10' i _NO'T'E A_: Dark Brown Clayey Silt, with Organics ('TOPSOIL) -i 15' 120' 25' 30' - I - 35' _ I - 40, - V Water encountered at _____ ft.while drilling - V Water at __ ,_f 1. ai completion Water at.--ft.after -hours �r� (:h,u Ipr; til siiato iu firaled by Ilan lines ale dltlnoxinlala btnnulaly between soil type;. The aclnal It,unilinn Indy be glarlllal and maty vat y cousnlelably belwcen bot illy locations. Dasbed lines sbouW be hlluillieled as mole allploxinlalr. Ilmll sold)lines. RECORD OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION 1S01HNG NO. GEA PROJECT NO.—�---'- I 5_ - ----- C-f;7 1108 `J'''] 1 FIELD REPnESEN IrATIVE DATE IlES f1GIf1f ERll1C� SSUCIAlES,IIIC. _ll/ /H1� Richard Ashman COf15U1111YG SOIL AND IOUIiUhllOfi Cf1C;IliE.06 PROJECT' Proposed Kinder-Care, Southwest Hall Blvd. , Tigard, Ore -- - DAl,rh %ample '`� r W 1 f?EMAftKS DESCfilf'TION� HAtow No h N Uu _ 1p �s I P. tmca FINVA"i(" Surface Iyp0 _ _,_—.I---- --.--- Ground Sur 97.0± f t S _ NOTE A — -— --- - _Brown Clayey silt, trace of fine 2-SS 12 1 .7 U.8 2.4 Sand - r77rCC77 -3-SS 14 2.3 1.5 0.7 20 -Boring Terminated at 5' -No Groundwater lincuuntered - - 10' Caving to 3' N0TE A: Dark Brown Clayey Silt, with Organics (TOPSOIL) .,0, 2P 30' I 35' I = nu' Q water encowr Bred at _. _ -f t, while drilliriy Q Watcr at-----ft. At cnmp!etion Water at_._.--ft.after _hours — v ,a 'i hr. af-111A 11.111001011#11,1V he ti'arlual and may Chdnrp's of •.h,,;d in,ln,,ff Icy rf,, fur•c ,n, ,,Irynnwim;ilc hnunil;,,y hrlwrrn sail IVIn ations. Dashed lines should he It,letlneted as U-I"•1001 ll"ale I'M" considerably betwren hutiny locsolid Ih►es. GENERAL NOTES SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION Geo Cicam Assoow.arc. All sample classifications reviewed by Geotechnical Engineer in accordance with Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D-2487) DESCRIPTIVE TERM (% BY DRY WEIGHT) PARTICLE SIZE (DIAMETER) Trace: 1-10% Boulders: 8 in and larger Little: 11-20% Cobbles: 3 in to 8 in Some: 21-35% Gravel: coarse- 3/4 to 3 in And/Adjactive 36-50% fl"e- No. 4 (4.76mm) to 3/4 in Sand: coarse- No. 4 (4.76mm) to No. 10 (2.Omm) medium- No. 10 (2.Omm) tn No. 40 (0.42mm) fine- No. 40 (0.42mm) to No. 200 (0.074mm) Silt: No. 200 (0.074mm) and smaller (Non-plastic) Clay: No. 200 (O.ui411k,.1 and smaller (Plash-` SOIL PROPERTY_SYMBOLS DRILLING AND SAMPLING SYMBOLS Dd: Dry Density, pcf SS: Split-Spoon LL.: Liquid Limit ST: Shelby Tube - 3" O.D. (except where noted) PL: Plastic Limit: All: Auger Sample SL: Shrinkage Limit DB: Diamond Bit LL- Liquidity Index[(w - PL)/PI] CB: Carbide Bit PI: Plasticity Index (LL-PL) WS: Wash Sample Gs: Specific Gr:svtty RB: Rock-Roller Bit K: Coefficient of Permeability BS: Bag Sample w: Moisture Content qp: Calibrated Penetrometer Resistance, tsf qs: Vane-Shear Strength, tsf qu: Unconfined Compressive Strength, tsf N: Penetration Resistance per foot or fraction thereof for standard 2 inch O.D., 1 3/8 inch I.D.,split spoon sampler driven with a 140 pound weight. free-falling 30 inches, in accordance with Standard Penetration Test Specifications (ASTM D-1586) Nc: Penetration Resistance per foot or fraction thereof for standard Cone Penetrometer driven with a 140 pound weight free-falling 30 inches Apparent groundwater level at the time noted after completion Depth to which boring caved during water level readings SOIL STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS COHESIVE (CLAYEY) SOILS NON-COHESIVE GRANULAR SOILS UNCONFINED COMPARATIVE BLOWS PER COMPRESSIVE RELATIVE BLOWS PER CONSISTENCY FOOT (N) STRENGTH (TSF) DENSITY FOOT (N) Very Soft 0-2 0 - 0.25 Very Loose 0-4 Soft 3-4 0.25 - 0.50 Lose 5-10 Mzdium Stiff 5-8 0.50 - 1.00 Firm 11-36 Stiff 9-15 1.00 - 2.00 Dense. 31-50 Very Stiff 16-30 2.00 - 4.00 Very Dense 51+ Hard 31+ 4.00+ DEGREE OF DEGREE OF PLASTI"ITY PI EXPANSIVE POTENTIAL PI None to Slight 0-4 A Low 0-15 Sl!ght 5-10 Medium 15-25 Medium 11-30 High 25+ High to Very High 31+ GEAA46/kah ELECTRICAL DESIGN ASSOCIATES 12531 S.E. 42nd Bellevue , Washington 96006 ( 2061 643-4104 June 3, 198'/ RE : KINDER CARE LEARNING CENTERS, INC. ENERGY CODE & LOAD CALCULAYIUN CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON DRAWINGS FOR KP. 135 & KP. 135S PLAN LA"VEST REVISION DATES: '-)HEE'r E-1 ( Z,-15-87) & E-2 & 3 ( 4-2:--H7 ' WASHINGTON ENERGY CGDE - LIGHTING INTERIOR BUDGET: GROUP "E" "DAY DARE CENTERS" 6, 112 561. FT. x 1. 7 WATTS/Sp. FT. = 10, 390 WATT'S EXTER IUR BUDGET: PERIMETER -- 327 LINEAR FEET x 7. 5 WATTS/L. F. = 2, 453 WATTS GRA14D TOTAL = 12, 843 WA'I'TS LIGHTING PER Pi .:N : TYPE TOTAL x WATTS/UNIT = TOTAL WATTS A 37 181 WATTS 6, 697 WATTL-, B 10 92 920 C 7 60 420 D 5 60 300 E ( EXIT LIGHTS ARE: EXEMPT FROM CALCULATION ) F 2 200 400 G (EGRESS" LIGHTS ARE EXEMPT FROM CALCULATION ) GRAND TOTAL - 8, 737 WATTS r"� KINDER CARE KP-135 & KF-1355 - SAGE 2 LOAD CALCULATION - ELECTRIC HEAT L.IGHT'ING 8. 737 KVA x 125% = 10. 521 K'VA :SIGNAGE 1. 500 KVA x 125% = 1. 875 TOILET EXHAUST FANS' 0. 400 KVA x 125% - 0. 500 RECEPTACLES 26 OUTLETS x 180 VA EACH _ 4. 680 KITCHEN EQUIPMENT NO DIVERSITY = 12. 600 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT NO DIVERSITY = 6. 400 WATER HEATER 4. 500 MISCELLANEOUS = 0. 200 MECHANICAL 100. 8 KVA x 757. = 75. 600 ( 4 UNITS SEPARATELY CONTROLLED) LARGEST MO'T'OR ( 2HP) 2. 8 KVA x 25% - 0. 700 TOTAL CALCULATED LOAD (492 AMP! ) - 117. 976 ItVA TOTAL CONNECTED LOAD ( 583 AMP':i) _ 139. 817 KVA LOAD CALCULATION -- GhS HEAT LIGHTING 8. 737 KVA x 3.25% 10. 921 KVA SIGNAGE 1. 500 KVA x 125% 1. 875 TOILET EXHAUST FANS 0. 400 KVA x 125% 0. 500 REGL:PTACLES 26 OUTLETS x 180 VA EACH = 4. 680 KITCHEN EQUIPMENT NO DIVERSITY - 12. 600 LAUNDRY EWUIPMENT NO DIVERSITY = 0. 400 WATER HEATER = 0. 200 MISCELLANEOUS = 0. 200 MECHANICAL 31. 5 KVA x 75 = 23. 625 ( 4 UNITS SEPARATELY CONTROLLED) LARGEST MOTOR ( 2HP ) 2. 8 KVA x 2ti% = 0. 700 TOTAL CALCULATED LOAD (257 AMPS) - 61 . 701 KVA TOTAL CONNECTED LOAD (276 AMPS) = 66. 217 KVA II ► K Irl 113 If CH L3 M M r•• r`• ,"' 1.1 In Y" in 6- M/ LUI A .1.1 .1•I 1111tl itl IJ ICJ M IJ +f -to IL in • LT •t•1 C• 1 . 7 IA • 41 U Q) a3 r" in 4. •• W CIA U M IN 1 U)1 JJ n 17 IM r- n 4• In N Pd y Y W 4.rj q1 rr CV in ICU •1 1 1 41 IJ,. 41 h C � 1 1 1 rP.f, . Ij Il .1 �••11w1yy 4.1 01 Ill 1 VI CIL. 1 1'1 rn I.1 L9UJI =3 {J 7c 1 4U' 1 •••� M �1 c.)� s� v W nin [[ u lJjV1 I1 111 r• 11 .` iI 1 i 1 13 Er i aJ .•. w , W1 v'1 Itl IU M L j! 'D r, rq ql cl ri 1A In m 1 tli l3 L. .N Cn IM ci All ' .� r 3 �0 c)f1 41 y i i a hM w Irl .� ,y .'Li.i in iul .-1 C:• .-. „ IJ 1n,11 1� c'ii I:r. u,; C•1 P .•+ r^ M r1.7.. • w SID F., 4'I r ), q 1. �i !• i 1 1� 117Im I 1 1 fJl N' a. M .J ,li tr,1' LJ 41 In ' UC1!!1 ill .64 c ; 11 11 11 M Irl fU� IU ! Cpl n F 4n C' 4' .-. r'i L; 41 't 1,3 13 en.-• +1• +P Cn IJ _J IA. - . I.r ve 1:1 .«/ •«, , 11 n 1)1 a.1 r-. `cl cT • CT I.i rq Iq 4>y t,if •nJ' 111 wf r! •J. y 1... t.: �p lu ul er r..it Mln 1!. GJ 1 •�y ..Ir a Ili <L• 11 1,1 U.l 11 M M f_I J'.] IU U u3 t:f.e1' 1 1..• l•' 1"A �µ'C{ 111 •:i •.• i i 1: ••w 1�3 !j L� r � I1+ 1f.1. Un, ., 4. .1;1 P! 111 q .r: rl r• .-. r• 311 C..! 1'} 1 '1.J 7R W. 1.12 IrA Cry Ini .•• C•d 1.1114 11! '••• t7 . C3 :.•l 4J IY/ ILA. IA e,I C3 r4 41 c• m Id �Il r1 tl 1 r• r•. r,- U1 y. %1 /UtU tll w '1 UI ' yy y � ql Itl �'� ctf tYf tYf Ih w. LIi IL L II ' Itou Iasi t 1 s r•t rt rt ") Ir W 111 ..1 I. .�, Cr I ' � lu In w ri T w tl , 2Y IA u T•1� I1 r.t iF.t f.' at .N IIA AIL: fill 1 irl id t '� tC M• .�.� a 1 v l FAr HI� t„ .'tl+ WL7l r '3 ml .N L.)� .1: rtF�• .1.1 p 1 41 cm r-3l 1 CI >V L c) ) LAI 03 U-3 r se t .. IY) 1 ) n m C. F: rj l �) 4j cn I 44 SM r7 u ,J•OJ tl) In r:, tl 1t; 21 u11"l -;i; .M 111 ftl C+f1f 1 Gti 1.AI�,,� V jj C, C4 N' ..-1 U[] QI Y:L .w <:, Itl v1 F•7 U'1 ] I+! IN u q, r- Vis. ...1 F') CO q/ �• 'M tJ 1 1 i 1�yy, M�� '� 'll tY Ct. C, CI !q 1.tl1 1'7 Ci tl .Cf yJ +. r let"t 11 11 11 „ w� till G to ru7 w faq 1� 3 LL. 7�lyt to •..� .�• [J "- �itlro ro bis 11 - .sryti „l +i• Fri .i- y. : C' `ti U, u: sr. Y O, + 11 It j t.. IU CI .Li <Y LCr1 Lai � r..• r CT�T i it i i I] 'd 2?1. i u1 ry 1:)] r1 4. h1 111 a r . .» . dlLy .I.�. ss ro le 11 1•,) mby �! r:ii 4f) Ul L V y 0 M ,J pj 7- t VLA13 Com* ►� co,4pmaas +7-L (o I a� MAX. LOADS ZONE N1 tone Sensible lone Total Supply Air No. Month Hour (Tons) ITonst VII) --- ----- ---- ------------- ---------- ---------- i Jul 1700 2.82 T.70 1,367 2 Jun 1700 2.79 3.69 1,363 3 Jul 1600 2.81 3.66 1,349 4 Jun 1600 2.77 3.65 1,341 5 Jil 1800 2.81 3.54 1,372 6 Aug 1700 2.77 3.64 1,343 7 Jun 1800 2.77 3.63 1,368 8 Aug 1600 2.75 3.60 1,3',6 9 Aug 1900 2.75 3.58 1,345 10 Jul 1500 2.74 3.56 1,309 i ,.._. ...::. .. ,..,..r—... ,.«.:,. -..,..•,n .>ur.ikind:,'•«,n ^i:.a�:.ai„,a.- «,•.....ar:.r.w.a:rnA.u,.wvc:wr+.nwleA4+idYnwnear.{.�"pYgW91wY^ww:-, SINGLE HOUR LOAD CALCULATION OUTPUT' Jul 1700h : ZONE #1 JOB NAI"IL'•':: F:*A dc--•r Care MIMICS' DATE” F"REF'ARED: ()7 :::c:)•_193(, IT k NAME." Wla'ST r.'X�N WASH I N 7T(:)N Washington 605ij 13`5 2 1. f.juTDOOR DLA/WE3: 7('.'). (:)/ 61. 0 F• INDOOR DD: 78. 0 w RI-1. 49 #>s•YM > #Ni4aEiflk###N #•##!f##ifNiF•#if#k.�F•###yNNNNNNN.N #N###### •N4(A.AJ!•NM•*•#-M Zone Loads & System In•forcnatti on Summary ('ac;1 1 1_00,D COMPONENT "MI'J;:3.11fl-E (Stu/hN• ) LATENT(B•tc..)/hr) ;-`n!._FIiY GAIN 3, 142 C, 1'1._113S I"RANSM I SS I ON --7:;:;U t:) lti�1L.1... T•F.ANSMI CION —268 0 !-d*,0F= TRANeiM 1 SS I ON 1 , 547 t:) -117AN'3. LOSS TO UNC:OND. SPACE: t:) t) !.. I.6 1-1 T f NC t 4, 100 W Tri-TAL.) 149 .'66 C) 1. ,U45 W TOTAL) 3,, 567 t,:) P (T. I.E~ t 52 PEOPLE TOTAL) 12, 80t 11 UE•I...L-ANE'OUo' L.OADIS c) c:) .c)O_'NG INFILTRATION c:) U CO.]L i NO S3AF=•r`r' I.._OAD C) t:) SUB T O•TA!.-5 ':4•, :'2 6 NFT VFNTILA11ON LOAD ( 263. C•1 m --132 --171 :A.1F'F'L Y FAN LOAD (L�HF*' f7, 7) t , 79 C) F�CJIaf= LOAD TO PLENUM C) c:) L_T GHT T NG] LOAD TO F,LEcNLJf,1 0 O•T AL COOLING LOADS 33, 9--:;o 1.c:), 54i i TOTAL COOLING LOAD 44, x.76 9 t u hr 01" 1. 7(.) Tor) or sqf t/ 1•nn ZUNE TOTAL. F' .00R AREA - 2, t:)90. C)c:) sqf t IOh1f: UVE BALL U—FC TOI•; - 0.t;"M Btu/hr/sg(*t/F N Nara *.**•#•#•#•M•#ii.***#•##•#•#***- -P # i.#u.#N N••#N ##N #N•#ik#p # Transmission and Solar (:3ai n by L:,cpasure GAD C:OMPUNEhfr AREA TRANSMISSION SOL.An GAIN (-sqI t) (1":+tu/hr) (E tLk/hr) 01.0'53 LOAD,3. NES (') Ec C) i) t:) G F t:) c:) r.') ,;W t:) 0 c:) W 3(:) —1.44 1 ,9`2 Nle,' C) 114 122 -3E3f., 1. 0 190 H 0 !) O WALI_ LOADS: NF_ c:) 01. - C SE5 t:) c:) c3 O c:► W C) c:) W 134• 216 1\1W c.) C) N 61 f., •-4 04 a..N.# # ###M##is*#M� ####at #a!•*N#.41 N.4.K N N. •#N.#.•#:: ii.A •#N It, •:.'W.ww ••..•.^..•x. .;'.rn.",u xxLMAMiYaMf.`h�ivWk71/Y'i41".4iW.M"i'MINIWhasmYv'ai/#W4a.i'fIFnu✓dOBiMYibYfl�Y+dF41NpL� SINGLE HOUR LOAD CALCULr'•1T I O d (.'J(J'T'F'UT JUI 1700h : ZONE a#1 JOB NAMi k,: .nder Care. MIDI/CS DATE. F•F�EFIARED: o7-3'0--1,986 SITE NAIIE: WESTERN WASHINGTON Wash►a ngt.r_)n 6C-)5I►1£J52. 1 OUTDOOR DBI/WD: 70.0/ 61 .0 E INDOOR DEI: 78. 0 F• RI-1: 419 �%•Y#.#•M•.iF�f}F•!E•H•IF#•#••M•►F iiF#••##•#•iF�f••If••iF#•#•#•9F►h•!F•IF•N•iF•iF#•aF#F•IF#•*•#••!F•K•it�••M#•►h#•.i�if.If..N..N..;F#•##•# 9. 1 13eIeat J nn Par•Amet r s 1.)g .._ COIL_ ENTE.RINC AIR 11::I1P. (Dri/WB) 76.5/ 63. 4 dc:g P COIL LEAVING AIR T[-7;r!r'. (DI.i/WIa) 553. G.' 52. 1 deg F COIL 13ENaIBL.E LOAD i:aa8'(.) ELI t.c.I/h7r f.:gIIW '�OT,1L LOAD - 44, 370 Eakcc/hr "'OOL I NG SUPPLY AIR TF MPERATURFi: 555. 0 deg F• 17 TAL COOLING Cf m - 1, 367 Cf m COOLING Cfm/yclft. - 0.6 Cfrn/syft. REsUl._1'ING FROOM REL. HUMIDITY -.. 46 (: OIL BYPASS, F-*ACTOR - t:►. 1 0 ##•#if#•#•:M•*••IF•i!••N•If?fI••N••It••ii••N•�•!!•if#•iF.Y.v.v�••n'•1F'#I.4F�'dk iE�F•IF•Y.•4F#�F#•k#•iF dF#••K••M••M•#•jl••N•#••Kr•!E•#•#•#•ii••►F HLAT I NO LOAD G'ALCULA I I ON "U'l" ZONE #1 JOB NAME: Kinder Care MIDIXG DATE 07-:7.0-3.906 SIIE NAME: WESTERN WASHINGTON Washington 60301852. 1. WINTER DESIGN DRY BULH: 1 . 0 F INDOOR OB: 70.0 f.' HEAfING LOAD SUMMARY Note! Heating land is computed at winter des-iign condition. ...OA)) COM1-',ONEN I' LVAD (Btu/hr) Wf:,LL TRANrz,MISSION 4, 250 ROOT" T.RANSMISSIC31N 5, 760 GLASS -rrmsmms)icrJ 6, 20--T TRANSMISSION LUGS 113 LRKXND. SPACES ii INFILTRATION LOSS SLAB FLOOR 6, 27e., HEAITI',IG SAFE'i"Y BtLl/hr- 4, 51"1 - ---------------------------------------- -------------- - ---- SUe-T07AL. 27, 10,t NET VENT ILATION LO.'-.*.,,t:j 19, 6U6 - ----------------------------------------........ TOTAL HEA'fING LOAD 46, 7% NEAT ING SUF"PLY 616 Cb-ii HEAT IN3 SUPPLY AIR 1EMPERATURE 110. 0 deg F HEATING VENT.ILAiTION AIR C+m 261 Cim HEATING SEASON ROOM D17:Y T11MP. 70. 0 deg F Pic Pu�.J (mow v p MAL .CADS : ZONE #2 �i,60 COAV yen — -7 I°F ZO:.e Sensi:le Zone Tctal Supply Air Ne. Month Hour ITon s) (rcns: (C+a) --- ----- ---- ------------- ---------- ---------- 1 Aug 1300 :,93 ,2.53 942 Aug 11,110 ;.?7 2.53 937 3 Aug 1600 '.95 2.52 ?36 4 %g 1400 1.95 Z 52 936 5 Jul 1670 1.92 2.49 923 6 Aug ;200 ;.90 42,49 942 7 Jul 1300 1.P9 2.49 923 8 Jul 1500 1.93 2.49 920 9 Jul 1400 1.91 2.48 917 10 Aug 1700 1.89 2.47 91` SINGLE HOUR L(])AD CALCULATION OUTPUT 1--loc Auc.4 . .) h, . ZONE #2 NAME. V:Ander Care MDI/CS DATE: PREPARED,", o7-:30-1906 ,i,I TE NoME: WESI"ERN WOSWINUTON Washington 6(-.)5(.)1052. 1 OUTLOOF't, DB/Wl*_4: 69. 0/ 61.0 F INDOOR DD,". 78. 0 F RH: 49 % Zone Loads R,. Systemi Informati.c.)n 133ummar-Y pg t LOAD C01,117,C)NEN'r SENSIBLE (Eltu/hr) LATENT (EttLl/hr) -5, 751 301-AR uAiN OLAS.13 WALL 'T'RANSMISSION 64 0 ROOF TRANSMISSION 1,13 tJ TRANS. LOSS 'TO UNGOND. SPACE 0 L I UHT I NG 2, 770 W -TOTAL) 9, 454 O"I"HER ELEC. 693 W TOTAL.) 2, .3,64 PEOPLE •°'`3PEOPLE TOTAL) 8,4U3 1,11.9)CELLANEOUS LOADS COOL INU, INIF1.1-IRATION 0 0 COOL I NG SAFETY LOAD 0 0 w___.....___......_._.____.__._.. 'TO 1"( 23, ('3 5,01. 7 099 SUB -,LS NE-'T VEWILr1'TlOhl LOAD C.#:M) 126 SUFT-'LY FAN LOAD (BHl`= 0.5) ROOF LUOD TO PLENUM LIGH1 .L'N(2 LUAD M t:"LENUM 0 10'1*,,)[- iM'JL11,1G LOADS 184 7, 224 OAD 09 Btu/hr o r ti:3 'ran 01 %q.ft/ Ton ViNI.-. TOTAL FLOUR AREA 1,3E-,jffj.(N) sqft ZLJIVI OVERALL Ll-FACT(.*,lR C.). 7 1 B'tU/hr/sq+t/F ji-j;o-isimissicin and lciolar Gain by EXPOswre LOAD t-AIMPONIE'NT A R E A TRAN5M ISS I ON! SOLAR GAIN (sq.f t) (Btu/hr-) (Bt.u/hr) GLASS LOAMS'. NE-: cl E 40 -216 SE. 0 0 S 31 -162 1,901 S,w t i C) 0 W NVJ N 1.4 WAI.J.- LOADS., NE E 424 SE s 2:313 295 Sw NW N 68 79 SINGLE HOUR LGAD COLCULATION OUTPUT ALAg ZONE #2 JOB Id iNE: 1:Aj icltr Crtry MIDUCE.), DATI'--' i--'R'E-F'ARED. 07-30-19136 SIT' NAME: WE'STERN WASHINGTON Washington 6 Q 5 C)18 2. 1 OUTDOOR DS/WE,: 4)y.C;/ 61. C) F- INDC)OR DIS: B.o F RH: 49 rjg 2 (AD LL PNI-ERING AIR TEMF,. (DD/WJa) 76. 1*31/ 6S 4 deg F C:',:rl LEAVING AIR TEMP. (DL't/Wj.'() S/ 52. i. dc-,U F-" COIL ISE.'INSIBLE l...OAD 23, 1B4. L;tu/hr- COIL. T(-,TPL LOAD :50, 4(.)f3 Btu/hr CC)OLING SUPPLY AIR 'TEMPERATURE 5. () deg F TOT'AL COOLING C4:(n 942 C'fm Cfnl/c-i(.j.ft ("). 68 C-f rri/sqf t RUGtl WEL. HUMTEMJ: - 46 % COIL l'.iYFAlj'G C). 1.30 HL-f-'fl-ING LOAD CALCULATION OUTPUT Z 0 N 17 wilt nder Care MIDI/CS DATE F'REPARED: 07--30.-19B(.., ,JOB NAME: K-U GITE NAME: WEL!"I'l-ERN WASHINGTON Washington 6(-.)r5(-.)1052. 1 WINTER D1:131 UN DRY 1-�ULD: 1 .0 F INDOOR DB: 70.0 F HEATING LOAIa SUMMARY Note. Hez�.tj.ng load is cufoputtcd at winter mes.-ign t7cncjj*t-.jon. LDAII) 'C'011PONENT LOAD ( ALt/hI-) ;UAL. I.- TRIPINSITSS ION o R U0 F: 1-R- 14 I'q IS i".1 S S 10 N 82:'-5 GI-AE.,'33 TROINSMIE"'•,ION 2,89e IRCAISIIIISSION LOSS "CO UNCC.)NID. 13F-,ACE-'S C) LOSS C) '�A-,-U.-, F -J LUCIR , 144 ['jj rik:3 SAr-'ETV I2.tu1hr- ---------- 3 U B--T OT 6 L 191 0 73. NET VI NTILATIGhl LOG,-D 13, o4-5 T0'rAL HEATING LOAD .3.2, 119 1 HEATING SUPPL\, Cfm 433 C4:m FIE04ING SUPPLY AlF.: TEMPERA-FURE 1. 1 c).t') deg F HEATING VIE IN 1'1 L P)T 10 N A I R C 4:m 173 Cfm HE.Al"ING GE ASCIN ROOM DRY DULD TF.-MF",. 7C).(*.*) deg F s MAX. LOADS : ZONE 1}3 Ione Sensible Zone Total Supply AitS'�" rant` flour (Tons) (Tons) V m) 1 Aug 1600 3.53 4.51 1,687 2 Aug 1500 J.52 -.48 1,672 3 Aug 1700 3,45 e.46 1,665 4 be; 1600 3.47 4.42 1,686 A1g 1400 3.44 4.42 1,648 6 Se: :300 3,49 4,41 1,682 7 Jul :600 3,43 4.41 1,643 6 U,al 1700 3.38 4.JB 1,6:: 9 Sep 1400 3.43 4.JB 1,669 10 Jul 1500 3.40 4.J5 1,617 r SINGLE HOUR LOAD CALCUL ')TION OUTPUT Aug 16(-.)C)h : ZONE #:`:, JUD NAME: 1<indor Care M1.DI/CS DATE Pl�EPARED: STI'L" !\Jt,-)ME: WESTERN WASH INGI-13N Wasshi ngton 6 055t►I G,755 2 OUTPOUR DB/W3: 71 .(:')/ 61 .0 F INDOOF.'%, Db. 70. 0 F RH: 49 % A.**.X -:omLoadr4 System In+ormatiorl SUmmary LOAD p�l I SE.NiSIBLE L AT E N T(Ef t u h r SOLAR GAIN 6, 624 (D GLASS 1"RANG1113SION --504 WALL TRANSMISSION 625 ROD:` TRANSMI1,3GICN 1 :x`66 ll'RAN'33. LOSS TO UNCOND. SPACE L 10:I C , NG 4, 690 W TOTAL) I 0";.Hk.k ELEC. 1 , 173 W TOTAL-) 1.1, )02 x. 259 PEOPLE' TOTAL) 14, clJ 3 120 ow , .L . 0 1-, 0 PL I M I S LL I..L A N ED LJ S Lf.')ADS CM-1-INU INPILIFIAT'ION 0 COOL_11`1(3 SAt7ET'Y LOAD S U 1.4 1'3 1'i^'L S 42, 30:312, NET' Vf--'j%lTlLATION I..cjt-)I) ".1-41 _424,1 SUPPLY FAN LOAD (.-). 9) 2, 206 0 RUM— LOAD TO VI-ENUM C) ti t-imirING LOAD TO PLENUM i i 0 TOTAL '%-"OJLII'4G LDJADS 42, .-.--48 11 773 1 QT�-!;I COPL0,16 [-"*J(-',D Mj lll- 4. `J1 Ton or 4. 121 DtLi/hr ZONE 1*(JTAL FLOOR AREA 5:L 9. 9 sqFt/ Ton x,45. uo t ZONE OVERALL U-47-ACTOR -*41* *. -if- . *. * *.)(.*.**,**.X J. (17C.) Btu/hr/st.1ft/F _***.jj. ***-Vw * ***-P. .*)I TransmirS4rol-, and Solinir Gain 1:7y Excposuro LOAD (..'(.,MPONENT AREA TRANSM I SS 101,4 SOLAR CSA 1:%j (sq,f t) GLASS L.(.',ADS: p,lE ._-..__._f,_..__.___..______.__._____.___�.___.....__..__�... Sf 0U 0 S 90 .3 w 0 0 Q W 30 —126 1 ,586 NW t i 0 W0.1-L LOADS: NE 0 0 E 0 o SE 0 0 S 446 373 Sw Cj W 250 250 Nt,j M. SINGLE HOUR LOAD CALCULOTION OUTPUT ALIg 16(-*)C),h 'ZONE #3 ,70Er-!AMEI: Care MII"IJCS DATE PR FARED: C)7--::,(")--1986 SITE NOME: WEE11TERN WASHINGTON WAshingtori 6050 1052. 1. DUTDOOR DP/W19: 71 .0/ 61 .() F INDOOR DD.: '78.0 F IRH.' 49 % Coil c=;(-.-Iec-A-.A.rjn pg 2 COD. ENTERING) AIR TEMP. (DT.'I/'WI-.D 76. 8/ 6,7. 3 c1c.;,g F COIL LIZAVI'NG AIR 'I"EMP. (DB/WB) 3*";.. B,' 52. 0 deg F COP.. SENISIBLE LOAD 4'.:, ::'49 StU./hr COIL. TOTAL LOAD 54„ 121 BtL.t/hr' COOL :1 NG SUFE LY 01 R -I-EMPERATURE 5 deg F TOTAL. COULING Cf m 1 , 627 C m COOLING C-fai/stIft Q. 72 C+m/5,q+t RESULTING ROOM IREL. HUMIDITY 45 % COIL BYPOSS F'ACTf',)R 150 • HEATING LOAD CALCULATION arrPUT ZONE 03 QOB NU)Ml: Qnder Care MW/CS DATE PREPARED: 07-10-19R6 SITE NAME: WISTEPN WASHINGTON Wasnington 60501852. 1. WINTER C&SIGN CRY BULB: 1. 0 F INDOOR DB: 70. 0 ['' N k*****1******* *VN K**44***-X****-Kj(.***** HEATINE! LOAD SUMMARY Note: Heating load is computed at wintew design condition. CUMPONEN1 LOAD (F-ItU/hr-> 3, S42 ROUF TRANSMISSION 6, 472 UI.. ASS THANSMISSICIN 4,"68 TRANSMISSION LOSS TO UNCO1',1D- SPACES (:I i:,*7iL."rRA,ru)N L..(jFjs 0 SLAP FLOUP 5, 927. HEATING SAFE"TY Btu/hr 4,241 SUB-TOTAL. 2S, 446 NET VENTILATION LOSS 22, 008 ------------------------------------------ I AL PEA'r'INE-3 LOAD 47, =4 11EATING SUPPLY C+m 578 U+m HEATING SUPPLY (AIR T E 11 F,E.:R A T U R E 110. 0 deg F HE'.01ING VE.N'FlLATICIN AIR (.'-fm 293 Efm HEAT INU SEASON ROOM DRY E'.ILJL,.Uj TEMP. 70. 0 deg F MAX. LOADS 1C]NE #1 Zone Sensible Zcne Total St-ipply Oir No. Month HOUr T C.)1-1 (Tons) (C+m) U1 1:500 9C) 1 , 41.4 j1 1.2 C, 91.3. :3. (30'. 1 , A-4C) J 1300 '22 a6 79 1 , 4()2 JLA 1 120o .2, B7 1 , 4:311. 5 J u 1, 1. 1 0o U a 71+ 7,7 1 , A-57 13 C)0 B1 3. 77 1 , -,"99 2(K) 2.81.3 3. 77 1 , 426 1 1,600 2. 9(.') 3%. 1 ,391 c7 Jur, I 1 02 3. 75 i , 4 Ei ,Jul 1504.) 2. 91 3. 711 1 R MAX. LOADS ZONE 412 Zone Sensible Zone T c)t a 1. Supply Air No. Month Hour <Tans (Tans> M) 1, Aug 1600 2. 09 2.67 1 , 000 2 Aug 1700 2. 06 2.e,-;S 993 Aug I I),C.)C) 2 (7)7 2. 63 983 4 J U 3. 1600 2 ()5 2.6". 9s0 5 j u 1 1.700 2. U:3 2.61e.", 979 6 Sep 1600 2.04 2.60 991 7 Jun 1700 1 . 93 2. 58 963 2 Aug 1400 7. 01 2. 514 961 9 jon 1600 1. 99 2.51.3 1461 11") Aug 1800)() 2. 01 2. 57 977 MAX. LOADS ZONE #3 Zone ,.)esrssible Zone -rotai Supply Air !'.Ica. Month Hour (Tons) (Cf m) Jul 1. 31.AU 4. 411 1 ,677 7 J an 1700 43 1 ,669 Jul 1800 A . 4t 1 , 696 4 At.tg :1.700 3. 43 4. 4'.':; J. , 655 5 J t..t n 18C)o r. 45 4. 4:': 1 , 606 6 AL.tq 11300 3. 44 4. 40 1 , 67C J u 3. 11.600 4. 37 1 , 628 F3 J un 160C) 3. 35 4. ".",5 1 ,62C) 9 Aug 16 C.)0 -3'.•35 4. 3 3 1 ,60a IL 0 MAY 1700) » 30 4. 26) 1,643 CAVakI-Y- - '77-/(, IIOX. L.G)ADS ZUNI�I:. #J. Z c)n e c,3 e-,n s i h I e. Zunp 'Total CI.,)cAi-)P].y Air" Mt nth HOUr on c. (CM) .......... S,(-.2 p 1.4()0 4. 2.-.::" 1 , 620 11. 21 1 , 5137 Aug 1.400 u 15 :3,4 4. 2C) 1 , sq I Sep 150(; 3. ;S6 4. 1.9 1 , 61.. p 28 11 6 Aug .131 C) -3.25 .11 17 7 Aug 141C)() le"14 4 16 564 16 0 t::► 2 0 u 1700 12 4 0`2- lo A u(1 1.200 :1.2 1. o2 1 534 'I A X j,D C�Oj p tnoj -7 2,AIf 9 LOADS ZONE zone sensible Zone Total. S 1.1,p F.)1.v A j.r 1 n t h Hour Cronsi) (Tons) (C al) ....... . �.------- I Jul 1700 2. C) 2. 5 1? 967 Jen 1700 1 . 98 2. 58 966 $!I 1800 2.01. 2. 57 97*7 AGB(1] 1700 1 .98 2. 56 954 5 Jun t000 1 . 913 2. 56, 970 6 J LA I 1600 1 . 97 2. 5 4 944 Aug 11300 1 . 97 2. 54 961 S Jun 1.600 I . 94 2. 53. 9:30 9 Aug 1600 1 .94 2. 51 932 !0 May 170P 1 . 139 2. #5 943 MAX. LOADS 9 N E #3 q�la) CvJP 91SO03S r- 7 Z-A&I Ir- Zone- Sensible Zone Total ELtl::)Ply Air' No. Month Hour (Tons) (Tons) (C+m) ----------- 16 C')C-) _ . 03 :3.98 1 , 463 2 JLAI 171:)0 3. 98 1., 462 Jun 16 0 C) 3. 97 1 , 458 4 0 i..t n 1700 ^. 9I 97 1 ,457, 5 Jul 1500 3. 02 3. 94 1 , 443 6 A Lt g 1600 2. 99 914 1, 443 7 Jun 15(::)(:) 3. 9:3 1 ,442 1700 2. 96 93 1, 441 Oug 1500 2. 90 3. 9C-) 1, 42 J L.t 1 16c:) 2. 97 7. 90 1 ,458 A'A'. I_(3(1D"; PUAA' (W-) cDJ 12 1,vc- Zone Siemsible Zone Total Supply Air- Na. Month Hour (Tons) (Tan SO (Cf.m) I JUI 1700 3. 42 1, 6111 "T7 2 plug 1700 4^ 1 1 , 63 j u 1 IGOC) :3. 4A. 1 , 650 4 Jun 1 7C)o '. :%6 4. 29 1, 624 5 Ai.ig IGO() :•. 4.1 Ll . 0 1 , 646 6 JL,n J.S 0 0 1. 27 1, 640 7 Aug el. 22 1 a q Jul 1 L1.1 0 0 1. I592 9 J u n 1600 35. 27 1 ,569 I'lay 17o(.) 3. 25 1 , 606 0) 2'0NE #2 TLAP (or- Zone Sensible Zone latal SLIJ)Ply 1':artth Hour (Torls) ;'Ton,) J U 1 .1600 1 . Hl. 2. ._Y1 F37 1 J u I I TO 0 1 . 79 2.36 868 1 1* 6 U 1-1 1600 1 . 78 2. 866 Jun 170o 1 . 76 2. 35 E46/4 16(. 1 ., 71A 2. 311. 859 I ,C)0 1 . 79 2. .:4 857 u g 1700 1. 7.j 2. 34 057 L -1 1 X)o 1 . 77 2. 855 u g 1'. C)t. 1 . 77 2. ::-*.,2 BAB JUI 1800 1 . 76 2. 31 865 'Z7 o $?6-AvO CcP)D MAX. LOADS ZONE #3 Zonct Sonsible Zone Tot-a1 E.*)LA P P)1 y A i r No. Month HCJLII- (Tons) ( Tons) (C'+M) I ALIg 13)C) 3.25 4.27 1,584 2 ALIg 1500 4.2,1 1 ,571 3 At..tg 16(.)(:) :.:.,.2! 4. 24 A , X71 4 Plug I A.C)o 3. 27 4. A. 1 , 5 70 5 j u 1 1300 3. 22 4.::;`" 1 ,571 6 J u 1. 1600 3. 26 4.22 1 , 564 7 Jul 15()C) ::, . 27 4. ld2l 1 1 ,559 8 A(. g 1.2()C.) 3. 21. 4. 21 1 ,59('-') y J(.t I I A-00 *3. 21 4. 2)C-) 1 ,555 1.0 J LA 1-1 3. 16 4. 1.9 1, 554 ... ' 0'D N i , ofFJr . CLARK JOHNSON CONSULTING STUC`rURAL F.NGI=R ORE,, rd 920 108th Ave. N.E. #1 BFZLEVIIE, WA. 98004 (206) 454-7137 �•- S T R U C T U R A L C A L C U L A T I O N S PRQTECI': K 11.11 _2 CAR E DATE: LOCFirION:_f oZr- --_ --__ . Q BNA JUB NO. BUILDING CODE: ___- U L — LCVU)S: ROOF DEAL; LCA.D = 15 PSF FLOOR DEAD LOAD = tJ4 PSF F'OOF LIVE LOAD = 2.5 PSF FLOOR LIVE LORI) = t-4 ,A• PSF ROOF TC rPAL LOAD= 4-o PSF FLWR TOTAL LOrV1tk- N,A • PSF ()TfF'R FLOOR LOADS: WIND LOADS: P= 15.5 PSF cc--- 0._7 Cg= 1. 3 qS_ 17 I= 1.0 60" P14 EXP. SEISMIC WPBS: Z= /4. I= I'o K= 1. 0 CS= W= KIPS RM'AIN:ING WALLS: W•A, PCF MQUI19M- IT FLUID PRESSURE) FOCITINGS: Psoil =20001'SF CIEO?ECHNI CAL RE PORT: Q pf. k D 'I:D: t•17\TERIAL ALIAbtABLE STRESSES: C01 r- 3- . f' C-,LAf1 f 'c= 2.00c) PSI 1• f 'c= P5I RI INT'�)RCINU STEEL Gt(e„ATjFZ 40 I� 4U KSI FS = KSI STRUCTURAL STEEL A.�'IT1 A FY = KSI 1`60LTs Asti A Fs = 24 Ys GLI_T:-I,A,IINATED BFMIS CURB A I'b PSI Vv = _.___-- FSI. SAWN I.IA4BER AS Wr ED ON THF DRAI4'NrT OII IN 11iL•: WT.-RAL NMTS. T'Ll'VXX)D (RbDOF) : VZ, " C. I�)X PL`'' i IK)bFLX PLYWOOD (FIZOR) : lip, CA k 0912 _o c,L1 •T4�S' �� I - I •Ca G/o = k'•g 40 'b +z' R o e� a t.- "� s-�- ►'''. i N p Q Tar r 1 Air P. p Erb L L Z.i 1 �I1TL."•� C1, '� 40�� 1 �y,, rj> O 14 D >Z. Ty p 25 G vS red P n� 711 lip 3fl �- t'trjpaob� .^� 1 p 1 0 Z_ !Alp- 4-•& • 4- .Dr-Oz M ^^max 2-Z.ID I ea � .n ers Jeb: l UD—E e. Subject: T `tp L c 2 I J m.. .o Job: ILII..fD�,R C�tK.� C I Date: -- - •y: Subject: -- oo W L LA L+ L 4x� , L) or, �. A z x 201 r � � � k x' 14- ;v% z z FG I ALL` 1 -I . I ALL cw 1p I c 416 ' F-x -Z ' wLL _8 4 IK z � 2 'Y' 6 I j— 1 I t I 1 .�. � T -q A►. * •1J� C6°'�1=� 3.3� '7th+ Glc'l _ - . y _ _._1..a . i---, . : . __i.._I . ;..x_13�0 1 (�;'�'�) �'�+(�'7 S�(�•A-�) `— - I'S+ .•74 zO �� I �aka'�� — --r—�- t �-- - 1-- - • - ' -CJ FG !� Aml Pio. 1 , �I tae: k � ►Jp�2C.-ARE IF IDate: my: Subject: �b U►�U�Tio1.I -- �� I -+- 2 S�p s FX Co 9 x 2. 0 ( 3 g +� C.c�u-r, aT Z K. Ak- _ .. 9, 1O I -------- I, w.2LIK. _ - p w•�r�ra L L `I - '1 '- i ArL 9 - 1. 44 20•S" ( I C; + -Z� � PSS W At = -7. qS i1F 1 * 5 COU r, b0T- 1S 0 , K. :F-T G, "6 V in t4J -D o SLA 5r.A 0 2t,� x rog 1 + 3'`.> ) K C' Zc'1 V, i `4 I.JIDf• C.cn FT' U/J�2 * �OrJ� • �2 Roel p)(p } 'bo 0 17- 14- r , r.J S=r �'•''r n Z J 1 r1 I Ll l_e..}x•.01 4•3 (Roc 1 C,c) �w�1 � �0�5 °��- �.o.�t-t�-c�l �•,G.1 ,.�5 �5 C L o••� / �- a l � . C�� F-•t y- ` Lioci �) I I of = 14� 16 SS� a 32 L7� n� p �' .-ops.. .J 1,�.'., r•-cj N _ s .�.y� •b'�/�.,� _ �(� '��-1- lob el: S L •v 41►0..� ; z,o ,�.�� N� = >5"5 4-' -r • 4-{ e )�e� _ t 5 4-' . 1211 _ Ib ©�'�•c c:>- --7cy,r-� C-O x P I ,� HZ r�1 -. 5) i\9/�{ .'S \(-I•S�~�i t~2 0 0-� vaj rod (0 .1 )��+.► ) (R.4)11.- L--"\1 - 4 - L - , r T �o.x " (�»�P�) �. a .,�, t '_ j . � � .•.;.:.: . IL It D � N