The URL can be used to link to this page

SCA 1-78 11460 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY Ai 9- X I C7 T1 P.-1 C► 1 W F-ptG��vl pod.114`j' RhO49A a- N N OF H'(DR N �' } \ ✓ •Q '9 Y 1'lmN / • ' . digQ w Oft (T tawdr l (�, I��, S �-�lr•hj�. ' �y'` �# I ":# x O , • . _ -rte• ..-- _ _ ..... �.. , A�� rli$ � f 1 '� I Rte'►- 1� � � � I . , . Yid' 6/+�' /_ �4 i it lo� '�4 4Z 1 ��'r�09 r r 1 ►4 r�N 1ti�'� �'�'�Y I�y F6!f'� � y r GI �` .� � i f � I 1 '�� •. 11 �1 1 1 ► dI . " � lit lob 0 ,�V p r - - .,, --.... -•-•.....! -ice`-... _ ._ -._. `� � 1 � � ..,,,. / 1 .*•, s. �.: f , _ �,\ x 1� ( / •\ `, ` 1 ` 14 1 �� 1">n y,�'•- j '- � ' � � f � j I ,,,,f� � r1` 'Q �I' ( I r � f,+•�I I ' � ,,�� ' `ay 1�• _ ! \ ' 1 I II t I ;r.- tXG 'T� ►�ANDILAPP�'t,(� ' I At 100 ru J � f I t � � I I _ •�. \ ,/ ' �\ } ` ` I7 J 1. 4 I I V• r j 1 w q I1 f ! !l(1 It 1 t • - . t 1 `' k � �' �� I+ • I I s�j�t` I �; 41`� i� , , t ` ''� ' ,xe, . 'j�;� , �, ��a�� t .; � ' "� ' \ i p ! � �` J ` � {. i,h� � 1 i •drOMi�•x+++r+fA:�+r4.'ilr.rf'w'..,,r'1y{'I�FrI fN low.�44w,ki 7p. / ' 1 f t1 ■r SS_ , 7T / _. ._.. l rw, ...�,�,ry,,., vr�f'ilMwr•.•�{w.��er......•w. ... .... .r•^., 'r` ��hf7 'b''��til�` ' v ll 1 rl!Y g ,N ` ' � \ J "A'T-»"."-'- ane-R+w•f,7.. *>. .«..,.. .1...-,mac.. + - �. + M' 40 lot �.-s"`za s�`', a'. ` , �-�� 1 E X1'5'r l N G � ` j ; . I i ._.•.#,t r, � l�ff��irT It�Cs ".�Tk�RN1f +�} �i+r�� r�"��' t �.V TFL►►N a l T l o�t �"�'w'�: ,,., va►y;�1�, �� LA►JT,Wc, l�i0, Qs4'�E AWWA'S 'V SAV /� a •- , /%y � , � k �• w .. -__ - _ ' ___. i c ;. : �`' ' • -'" �• � � '. �� Iii 1�e ,� IN �/, N - r - -r' ` _ t' •r/N�r ►r4 N LJ ;.. I t`'� �, AN 0 1 "1 E",c,rJ "r NIT � k " " rt l T - .) .� �" / \ • ` ', �f /� � 1 � ,x iN�W �F f�Jl�i itA �• .r..._..,•,r....G�._..�� , v a A�wyN u �• r�c.�F3t � � 1 8 16�, H d $tAV , c,�--- r UNI ev - �I AI�.•� Gr't J i .J Z. \ l` ___..------ �T'ftt�1 Cts T"e�hl'��t�',�y _ _ _ _ _ _ ._ - _ _ '1 '� ` �� • , r...--''' ,, PRINTED NIbP kSLOPLA, bFA rs T M I11LN r ro U N I T� 1 's..4:;, JAN 1 7 I !< , s7 SCALE : G•1N STI'e eJ G T I �rJ Y 1� . — Jj'j' 1 Nt�- DR"14G NILWOER'..• PAQIC Ihl�v S�LG�'s� - r'Z�aULAll ;,vr:Z TME HAr��I►G#"(�i"c.0 \ ._ 1 ij t _..—.'•--v+wl"/wrnrrw.+�r ►w++�Wn"'YRfOi''w"�`3'"'':wi _. A 1 .. ... _ � . . w.., wr,,.yw+w.nrt+lr+. ."^"",rnU.M..wrt,....,............... .. • ,, 17. fIlII'IIIII11111111111IIIII'III'tlllllllllllllil111II111111'111j1�1lip 11Jill I1t111I111III1I1) IIIIIF IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IItIt1111I111�t1t`tltltltlltltltllltllllltltltltltl'Itll�l"�� f NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED — 111 2 13 411 15 DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THF QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL. .I DRAWING. 0£ 6Z 9Z LZ 9Z SZ 9Z £Z ZZ IZ OZ 61 81 LI 91 51 t,1 £I ZI II 01 6 9 L 9 SI-- .-b� E �r!IIIUIlnII�uulnn�nnluulnuluulUuI1111I111111nIIunluullullunl+ullnillllllll111I11uJIHIIIIIJIIIlII111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII111111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlII111�WI�II�1111IuUIII11II111I1111IIIIlIWII�IRUlllllillllllllllllli!1111 ' MICROFILM SERVICE CO. Commercial Microfilming, Processing & SuppliesA1991 Portland OR. Seattle, WA.24 _ N 105• O i t l ide r wl-,v: P�Awt Ry Lrc:A'{{ r.� • r' old „�w...,,,r..,...... 9w ~t4/ 119*110 0 WIN, • w 1, M 1/0 JI , � .. - � t .. � ..:...,'!�Mf!MMI�UW!p�� '-'"w,Y!M�; ��.o 4 w.iw'1+.w ....a+U1.�.•.,.r ,,.wrw�.+r�,w.w,,, «...+.•..-..:....wr...,.•.^. .^.+�Iwlc.e 9+m•.. - may.► ..•....,..-....,._._..•......,.....,.._,. ,..._-_. ' � li 111`` Ill III III 11 � � I � III III .III III III III I ( I I (1 ISI �1 (I I_� III Ili � � ) I ( I III Ilr ISI IIS � � I �I� ! ISI ISI Ili I ( I oll � l � IIS SII � I � �,I � � I � � I � TIS IIS SII IIS � I � � I � � I � � � � , . I � I � 1 � I � I � l 0 1 � l � i � f � l l l � l � l � l � i � l � l � l � i .,O I � f � l ► I „ I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1'0 I I 12 NOTE : IF THIS MICROFILMED -- - - DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE , 1T IS DUE rO THF QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DRAWING. _ __ OE 62 92 L2 92 S2 02 C2 22 12 02 6i 81 LI 91 GI b I CI 21 11 01 6 9 L 9 S b E 2 1 �!IIIIIIII111�1111(III1�1111�1111�1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111�1111(1111111(111111l�IIIIIII111111111I111.111111�1ii1111�111111111►,III11111111�111111111111i1�S11�11111111111111111iu1111111111�1111111111111111111�1�1�1111111111111111111111111111�.1IllJrilill1�111t�111�11J.1.�111_Illlul�l►Jt�11�111111 � . MICROFILM SERVICE CO. � • MAY ' 24 1991 Commercial Microfilming, Processing & SUpplies Portland, OR. Seattle, WA. I 400 WAY SIDE MOTOR INN Sign Code Appeals (SCA 1-78) 11460 SW Pacific Highway 791*phaae 23"591 WAY W. LEE �'� 3enerai Contractor,Inc. 82111 s. L 28th AVENUE roxnAxn, OREGON 97202 � J Auk;ust 4, 1976 i Mr. Aldie Howard Planning Director - City of Tigard � 124?0 S.W. Main Street Tigard, Oregon 9721.3 Re: Wayside Motor Inn Signing Dear Mr. Howard: In accordance with our telephone conversation, I am writing this letter to the City of Tigard to ask that the permanent sign for the WAYSIDE MOTOR INN be moved to a new location. We have been given a sign code variance allowing us to install an entrance sign on the northern extremity of the property. If we could move the presenL sign as indicated on the attached print, it would allow some of the traffic coming from the south to see it in time to use the 69th street entrance and cut down on the traffic using the northern approach. I'm sure, even by moving it, some of the people will still miss the 69th entrance. But by moving it out, guests will be able to see it from further down the highway enabling them to make the turn on 69th. I hope you will give this your personal consideration and allow us to make these changes in our signing all at the same time rather than having to have the sign people do it In steps which is considerably more costly. Thanks for your help. Very trtily yours , Way Lc WWI./do July 25, 1971) Iv.. Way W. Lae �azu 26tti) tvenum :Io tland, dragon 97202 1 -,;a Cocke Variance A}peal with 1sep+eot to aijabW houses Point tsps PMitio Rlgh,-,,iy i jaids Mn GQr Inapt ..-04'r :Sr. Lear Plea" be advised that, the Tigard City Council at their regular �.I ; of July 26, 1179, ..oneide';nd 1,no- :A.,;peal t,.r arveM conditio li *14 (�) f the conditional. ►ase pornit for sigwinq tl-a Wayside: Motor Sur . Xt was the unanimous 11e01eLoo of the Counirl.l that th-v appeal i.,. upheld anA that 4% Ysign be allowed at the i7t'l?R?ndary sntranct- , side of the sign facing south to read 'Untr•: ave° and the nort;z side e9 the sign tc mead iso e,thinr to the of fec+t "Entrance Next- Left" . Tho sign to tae S' Y ��l/x� aftO. not 'co a xcesel 10 inclies ..t eou have any further questlons regardlnss this shatter. plrxw feel fi s;, to taunted we or Uto Fl,%natnq :.A'; :artment- sincerely. otlm I�xrt:lp c.i ty ceau.r,dsr D14;dh act Robert Pershing, berurity Bigns aendell away, Attorney Motion h'. ('.('r'j_ cr.,wc m Y •'y ippeal Adding the, zAir, .w.-Ild roAU`).-;iL not las--. than 120 days r c,r mo r a t f 1111 h !_{ti No addi tio. to he charged for appe.1--1 r,>u UL all E1.rcvjous tstinrony 'i: r : 1 � d i a a•S t L-.4'L f i c siirial to bE '115t.a ted r L. t o T, of C t to be made, L...Ap.proved ky unani-, ous V..: c V AS YOU WILL NOTE IN THE ABOVE MOTION, THERE WAS TO BE NO RESUBMISSION OF THIS APPEAL BEFORE 120 DAYS OR AFTER 180 DAYS. 120 DAYS FROM MARCH 27, 1978 (the date of this motion) WOULD BE JULY 25, 1.978 AND 180 DAYS FROM MARCH 27, 1978 14OULD BE SEPTEMBER 23, 1978. CITY OF TIGARD PUBLIC NOTICE Notice is hereby given that the Cit, Council will consider the following at Fowler Junior. High Lecture Room, 10865 SW Walnut Tigard , Oregon, on July 24 , 1979 , at 8 :00 P.M. ZONE CHANGE - A request by Western Racquet Club for a general plan and program review for a Commercial Industrial Planned Development in a .14-3 Light Industrial and C-3 General Commercial Zone of parcols totalling 20.75 acres at SW rarcien Place and Pacific Highway (Wash. Cc. Tax Map 27,1 1313, Tax Lots 200, 300, 800, 1100, 1101 and .1200) . 11OTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL - CONDITIONAL USE - The Planning Commission denial of a request by Way Lee to amend Condition 6 of a conditional use permit for the Wayside Inn with respect to signing for the secondary access point .from Pacific !Highway (between the Mobil Service Station and Wayside Inn) , northeast of SW 69th Avenue, southside of Pacific Highway (Wash. Co. Tax trial: 1S1 36AD, Tax Lot 6504) wizicli decision has been appeale:l to the City Council. All interested persons may appear and be heart] in favor of or against the said proposal. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Doris 11ar. tiq, City Recorder TT publish July 12 , 19 , 1978 .July 20, 197k,' Way W. Lee 5210 SE 20th Avenue? Portland , Oregon 97202 Deer Mr. Lee : Fe. Resubmission of Sign Code Appeal To confinn my call of last week with you office, I am hereby advEsing you by letter of your public hearing before the Tigard City Council. July 24, 1978 at 8:00 P.M. wih be the date and the meeting will be held at 10865 5W Walnut Street , Tigard, Oregon.. I.f you have any auet3ti.ons regardiag this matter, please contact me. Sincerely, Doris llartig, City Recorder 1)11 : 1W Al"' ER OF 'EP"'),d`' ',NO f;rv;J+No J:fr.r 11, 7'4 TF D THA nt V Ix 9 f) } f�- f ', �,` (-�:,::.{k:1 it 1 � a •,'<_ , / I � �, ;' � � .�ct, ,:fit /-c",- •—f'��"�+ A Ilk i % �, V��-SiVr� � � _�� /lf 0111-<r •`` - - ,/ .� i�(.:^� /lel;rY.//��•ee�!�� ail f r �Ae TV 'r A �A i :.f� ; al•i ✓�L[LL. . � -// .--�1 � � - -... f , / r � :�� Lam'.. �r � f r \ � f c .. t •ti 1 `' ./�.�.. � Vii- •- ii'•%r/�-t G.a'•J . � � � ., ��. i-l r /% i��/t�/=a i. � t t. L G�. ... .. _•� �. � / y i TELFPHONE: 1.503.245.6421 ,i .L 'k. c*- .'!FSM .drt•'_3 r'".., ,P'r,r!'.i , 114nJ ;, W. F.ACIPIt HIGHWAY -ARD, ORE(SCN 97; 1 NUMBER OF PHONF, CALLS RECF,'TVED FROM PERSONS WHO STATED THAT THEY CVVNOT FIND THE MOTEL. -��l ; 1,4+ t-44 1 .1-;-41 /)t LA I`ll (� o 14 . BUCKLEY REQUEST FOR SEWER CONNECTION ON S W . 1 I-1T;l AVENUE Limits) (a) City Administrator stated item was put on agenda anticipating; a written request from Mrs.. Buckley . As no request was received , matter was set aside pending further action by the Buckleys . 15. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS AGREEMENT - For Intergovernmental Cooperation. (a) Mayor Bishop stated matter will be discussed by Washington County Elected Officials at meeting of July 20, 1978 at 7 : 30 P.M. Meeti;ig conflicts with City of Ti.gard 's public facilities hearing, however , Council was urged to attend if possible.. 16. RESOLUTION No. 78-51 A RESOI,UTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MAKING A.i— POINTMENT TO FILL, AN UNEXPIRED TERM OF OFFICE nN THE TIGARD PARK BOARD. Edna Sakata - term expiring 12/31/80 (a) Motion to appoint : Councilman Cook , secunriod by Councilman Scheel, U . Approx ed by unanimous vote of Counc i l . 17. RESOLUTION No 78-52 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MAKING Al' POINTMENT TO EXPIRED TERM OF' OFFICE ON THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION Frank Tepedino - term expiring 7/ 1/82 (a) Motion to appoint : :ouncilman Mickelson ; seconded by Councilman Cook. Approved by unanimous —1)ta� of Council 18 . RESOLUTION No, 78-53 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MAKING APPOINTMENT TO EXP I II ED 'PERM OF OFFICE ON THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION Dt,ug Smith - Torm eNplrini 7, 1 /82 (a) Motion to appoint. Councilman Mirkf� lson ; st,u„nd(-gid by Councilman Cook. Approved by 3-0 vote with CounciimHn Seher.kla abstaining. 19. WAY LEE SIGN CODE VARIANCE APP 1I, - SW 69th tind Paci. ftc Highway (a) Mr. Wendell Gray , 900 SW 5th, Avenue , Portland , representing Way Lee, requested Council hear resubmission of appeal prior to expiration of the 90 days as set by 0,uncil , March 27 , 1978 directive. PAGE 4 - REGULAR COUNCIL RINUTES - July ln , 1978 (a) louncil and staff discussed whett,.er P1Rr,n�:,,,; �.ommissiun of Council (cont ) should considex the appeal , the length of time since last considered by Council and if public notice was required. Attorney Bailey suggested public notice be given and matter heard on July 24th (b) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Mickelson to hear appeal resubmission on July 24th.. Approved by unanimous vote of Council . 20. OTHER (a) City Administrator brought Council up-to-date regarding City vacancies . City Administrator has appointed Administrative Aldie Howard on interim basis to act as Planning Director until the position has been filled., (b) Councilman Cook inquired as to the status of System Development Charge for Tigard Senior High School . City Administrator reported he has not been contacted further by the school , (c) Finance Director requested Council approve accounts payable for June 30, 1978 in amount of $41 ; 11.6. 58. 1 . Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Scheckl.a to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council , (d) City Recorder stated petitions for City Council positions up for election in November, must be returned no later than August 9 , 1978 . (e) Mayor Bishop commended City Staff for manner in carrying on City business during difficult readjustment period , 21 . MEETING ADJOURNED 9. 1.0 P ,M. City Recorder C" ATTEST: Mayor Tolophoae 954-0591 WAY W. LEE General Contractor,Inc. $210 R. E. 96th AVENl1E POHTUM. OREGON 97909 RFCi�/V�O June 30, 197 , 519? Ory OFr,GARo Ms. Doris Hartig City Recorder City of Tigard P. 0 Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Sign Code Variance Appeal with Respect to Signing Access Point from Pacific Highway - WAYSIDE MOTOR INN Your letter. of March 31, 1978 Dear Ms. Hartig: On March 310 ,ou wrote to Robert Pershing of Security Signs Indicating we could request reconsideration in not less than 120 days fi7om March 27 . We would greatly appreciate the Planning Department giving additir.tal consideration at this time. The two free standing signs have made no change in the traffic problem. Our guests are irritated by the confusion with the same situation existing as in the past. People drive past the motel looking for an entrance and end up making "U" turns on the freeway. Our manager told me just last night that we have had over 20 complaints during the past month with one woman in tears by the time she got into the motel yesterday evening. We are losing approximately 1.0% of our gross for the current year directly related to the non-identifica- tion onidentifica- tion of the preml�;es. We would like to propose that the existing WAYSIDE MOTOR INN sign be moved closer to the street so it can be seen from more of a distance down the highway so guests can identify it before reaching the intersection. The free standing signs are now being hidden by leaves on the trees and shrubs that have grown causing an even greater problem. We are asking for your help now and your consideration in letting us move the sign and allowing us to put an "entrance" sign on the north ingress of the property. Very t ul.y yo , A'a.rch 11 , 1g78 Robert Pershing Sales Representative Security Signs 436 SF 12th Avenue Portland , OR RL: Sign Code Variance Appeal with Respect to Signing Access Point from Pacific Highway Wayside Motor Inn ).'year Mr. Pershing: Please be advi:3ed the Tigard City Council at their regular meet- inf. March 2:7, 1973 , considered your appeal to an,end C'onrtition No. of the C onditionn1 L;se Permit for sif-ninv tho Vav-;i,lo 'fotor Inn. It was the unanimous vote of the Council rrpgent to deny this ap- peal, adding the condition that the ai)r+lirant could request re-- consideration not less than 120 days nor more than 181 days from March 27 , 1976. No additional fees are to be charged for re- sul,missiotj and transcripts of all rreviotts testimony will lie made available. It was the intent of Council to reevaluate the situa- tion after the installation of the 2 free standing siv.ns and traffic sirnal. at SW 69th . If you have further questions regarding this matter, rl+=aso feel. free to contact me or the Pla.nninrr Department . Sincerely, CC : »ay Les- Tlorig ltartir Wayside 1otor Inn City Recorder DtI/p,jr R � 4 rJ)t: tr RS-I TO CITY OF T7."ARIA R••'' P.D. "SINGLE FAM!L1' RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT" AND ADOPTING EXHIBITS "A"„ "R", "C" AND "D" (;RANTING THE APPI ZATION AND FIXING .AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Wakem to :adopt Ordinance No. Appr ,,v( d by unanimous vote of Council presF,nt. Pi+RI It, HF..ARINt, - APPEAL - CONDITIONAL USE fl P!:inrlin�; Com, 4 :,Qion decial of a request by Security Sign Cum.pany for Mr. Way t or . ,1 Gorn,J i t i;,n 6 of :, c.ondi t lc ual u.-e permit fc,+ the- Wayside Inti with signing for the secondary Hr--E �4, point from Pacific Highway (between ! lil S(--,rvl.ce Station and Wayside: Inn), northeast of SW b9th Avenue, south I, t Pa, ific H?ghway (Wash, Co. Tax Map ISI 3bAD, Tax Lot 6504) which !,,n ^as been appealed to the City Council . 1• I hearing Opened. t iori of appeal by John. Laws, Assoc.late PIalmt.r . This appeal concerns ti i, l -icement of a sign i- the 69th Street area to direct persons to the W:+,. ;de Inn. Pull Ic lestirrony Proponents. I . Mr. Wendell Gray, 900 S.W. .5th, F,-:itland, Oreguu, attorney for Mr. Lee txp! dained the dangers inherent in pt,r.suns mak'.ng U-turas on Pacific Hlk;hway if they pg-sed the Inn and wished to return. Mr. Kenneth Cute, 1900 "C" St-reet., Vancouver, Washington, architect tc l the project, Rots-rt Pershfnw- Sccurit� Stgn Co. representative siq;gested that �dditicnnl signirik, wl= ilecess,ary, Puhi ic. testimony opponent z., N,,ne . ( d Plrinni-4 Department rec.mT-vended ,-I- nl,al of signing on secondary entranct, t'uhl it hr firing closed. + ! ! aa,n-i-i( ratl0n of Cour- i I , Mot i )„ ►w (.olrnciloran Cook, seconded b� Chairman Mi kr ] :=on to uphold appPnI notirlk tl .,t a "One sided sign" he allowed at the tet , �)ndary untranc.e as diagrct-mird I'V Security Sign CO. Motion failed by a a „unc i In ;,n Wakem and Fount i Imaan Sc het k 1 as vot Ing nay. Couvr i Iman Cook and Mi, kv! •:,,n out Ing aye. � aOUNCIL MIN11F , - Mat( h i lt4%>4 d (g) Motion b., i t.unci,. Cool., serorded 'y Cournclicrar: 'akem to deny appeal adding the condition that applicant could resub;r.i.t not less than 120 days nor more than 190 day; from this date., No additional fees to be charged for appeal resuba,.t: , io!' „ Aird , c c I 'Z . l i r of all. previous testimony be made av,ai iarle tv C0L)r:cil . N(.w ft :. - 3nding , ii;ri as well as traffic signal to be installed at 69th .end r, valuation of icrpgct to be made. Approved by unanimous votr of Council pr(--sent. I PLAT VACATION Request by Uorlald E . Poll.c:ck to )a al.e 4 portlun uf' the plat known as Graham Acres in the City of Tigard. Wa-,hinitc:� Cou,-..ty, Oregon (area located SW Highway 21 , SW Manzanita acr.eet and SW Myth A .. n!!e):• (a) Public Hearing Opened. (h) Sumlcation by Plarrir,g Depart.reent recon!^.Erdi-ga}cproval , (c ) No one appeared to be heard. (d) Planning Duparttrent recommended appro% --- 1 (E) Public hearing clo-ed. (f) Con�ideratior- of Cuurc.l ! .. (g) ORDINANCE No. 78- 20 AN ORDINANCE VACAT1Nc; A PORTION OF GRAHAM ACRES A PLAT OF RECORD, LYING WITHIN THE CITY OF 110,ARD, WASHINGTON COtrNTY.., OREGON. (h) Motion by Councilman Cock, fronded by C:unj:11mar. Sc•heckla to adopt Ordinance No. 78-20. Approved by unanimous note of Cour!,. iI pr Ik , RECONSIDERAT'I.ON OF ITEM 1612 - Tigard„ TDC slid USA AddEndtrm to contract. (a) Legal. Counsel reviewed th, hist(,r !.c t>,ckeicund of this contract.. (b) Clty Administrator Bark.ec recorr;:!c,ir,ded holding action on this matter u'�til TDC responds. Legal Counsel tc curtact }And report to Council . (c) Motion by C , ury i1'r:�-r 5. hcrk '. �. t:c0i,dp d Iy Cour,cII";an Cook to ta1,1E:. Apprr:ved by urat 'Pwu: vott A Cour!c 1 l t c -Eut . I'+ OTHER (a) Clarification of extrat.erritorfal ext( t-iccr! cf sewer linen by the City to areas out- lde the: City ar,d -u! re-!,atrnnshih to the ?oundary Commi'%i0w' in such i, ,! antes. Legal Cc3urscl �utrliitted 1FttEt ! clarification from the Attorney Ce!le.r91 's office, stating all exte: cion - ct sewer tines outside the Citq must to approved by the Boundary Crrird PAGE 5 - COUNCIL MINI'TES March 1?, 1147�, AFFIDAVIT t PUBLICATION y 1 � I'`' ' CITY OF 1'IGARll i i PUBLIC NOTICE STAR E OF OREGON, I : APPEALS COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, s' Notice is hereby given that the City ff Council will %:onsider the following at l Fowler> Junior High Lecture Room, I, cJosE-ph Sell-a fer ...................................... 10865 SW Walnut, Tigard, Oregon, on March 7.7, 1978, at 8:00 P.M.: hoing first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the publisherAPPEAL. — ZONE CHANGE — The Planning Commission approval of a re- o! The Tigard 'Dimes, a newspaper of general circulation, as defined quest by review o`Art Lutz &c Company for the . a preliminary plan and pro. gram for at 415 unit residential planned b,y ORS 193.010 and 193.020, published at Tigard, in the aforesaid county and development on a 941.91 acre parcel south of Scholls Ferry Road, between ,tate; that the legal notice, a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was 15th and 130th (Wash. CO. Tax Map ISI 39A. Tax Lot 502 and Wash. CO. 1 published is the entire issue of said newspaper for .... ........_........ Tog Mop ISi 33D, Tax Lo,s 190 and... successive and 101) which decision has been appealed cunser,ctive weeks in the following issues .___.__ 10 the City Council, (Summer Lake) March IS �' 22 , 1.978 APPEAL — CONDITIONAL USF The Planning Commission denial of a ......_.._................................_...................... _... request by Security Si);n Company for Mr. Way Lee to amend Condition 0 of a conditional use permit for the Way- (5I'gn�ature) side Inn with respect to signing for the ...... secondary access point from Pacific Subscribed and sworn to before me this ....._...23rd._... ...._... day of .._. ... _ ..... Highway (between the Mobil Servicen aod �ysi northeast of PRtrcll 19...78 SW h Avenue, southside of Pacific Highway (Wash, Co. Tax Map 1S1 36AD, Tax Lot 6511.1) which decision has been appealed to the City Council. L�.1 4°C......:.. �'L .4... a. :1 .. .... _ .._ Testimony will be limited to summa- Notary Publlc of Oregon tion of previous staten;nnts. BY ORDER OF"THE CITY COUNC H_ / q n1y commission expires ............ .... . ...: Doris Hartig, City Recorder c:.C.......h.... 19..Z./ 'CT 3591 Publish March 18, 22, 1978 '1 , ` a 1 � MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Dick Bolen SUBJECT: Way Lee Sign Code Variance Appeal DATE : March 23 , 1978 The applicant is appealing the Planning Commission 's denial of a request to sign the exit drive of the Wayside Inn on SW Pacific Highway. The Planning Commission did approve placing two signs at SW 69th . The Planning Commission 's decision is based upon the need to confine left turn traffic (coming from I-5 Freeway) to SW 69th which is scheduled for signalization . The Planning Commission is concerned that any signing at the exit would tend to encourage .left turn traffic. The applicant admitted at the Planning Commission meeting that the subject sign would have exit on one side and entrance on the other. The Planning Commission found this to be contrary to the original conditional use approval which stated that the primary access would be through a signalized intersection at 69th and the exit drive should be subordinate. Therefore , the Planning Commission approved that portion of the applicant ' s signing program (he now has three free standing signs approved) which directed traffic to the 69th Street intersection . Received Feb. 17 1978 CITY OF TIGARD SECURITY SIGNS, INC. February 17, 1978 City of Tigard City Council Members of the Council: The Tigard Planning Commission, on the meeting of February 7, 1978 denied the request of the Wayside Motore Inn to amend Condition No. 6 of a Conditional Use Permit with respect to signing for the access point from Pacific Highway (between the Mobil Service Station and Wayside Motor Inn) Washington County Tax map ISI 36AD, tax lot 6504. We wish to appeal. this decision to the City Council. We feel. very strongly that this sign is necessary to help direct traffic, that has missed the 69th St. entrance into the motel. It will help simplify the problem, which can be very hazardous and confusing to people not familiar with the area. Your serious consideration to finding a workable solution to this problem would be deeply appreciated. Thank you, SECURITY SIGNS, INC. signed by: Robert Pershing Sales Representative RP C, 0 P Y CITY OF TIGARD P.O. Box 23397 12420 S.VV. Main -�JECLJ V D P E Q ' Tigard, Oregon 97223 February 14, 1978 Mr. Way W. Lee 5210 S .E . 28th Avenue Portland, OR 97202 Re: SCA 1-78 Dear Mr. Lee: Please be advised that the Tigard Planning Commission at their regular meeting of February 7, 1978, approved your request for a variance to Title 16, Sign Regulation (Section 16. 36 .040 (3) (A) Free Standing Signs on a, 3. 15 acre parcel north of S .W. 69th Ave- nue (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 36AD, Tax Lot 6504) . This approval is subject to the following conditions: 1 . That a site plan be resubmitted that indicates the exact location of the directional sign on the Coco 's Restaurant premises . 2. That 9. directional sign on the Plankhouse Restaurant premises be loc��ted south of the existing Plankhouse sign on S .W. Pacific Highway (exact location to be de- termined during design review) . 3. That both directional signs be subject to design review. If we can be of further assistance , please do not hesitate to contact ane at this office . Sincerely, ('Joh)L Laws Associate Planner J.L,/bkm cc : Bob Pershing Mr. Way W. Lee SCA 1-78 Page 2 Note: The following acknowledgement: must be received by the City of Tigard within fourteen ( 14) days of your receipt of this letter. Failure to return this acknowledgement may result in action by the City of Tigard. I hereby acknowledge this letter documenting the action of the Tigard Planning Commission. I have received and read this letter and I agree to the decision here documented and to abide by any terms and/or conditions attached. Sig • - — _ - Hate 7� Please he advised that conditions subject to staff approval must be satisfied prior to issuance of building permits. REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF February 7, 1978 EXCERPTS CONCERNING ZONE CIiANGE SCA 1-78,"WAYSIDE INN PERSHING: My name is Bob Pershing and I'm the sales repre- senLative for Security Sign Company. My address is 436 S. E. 12th Street, Portland. I am here to represent the Wa •si.de Inn. A gear or so ago when this motel was first being proposed, I came to the City of Tigard to Nancy Edwards and Rick Daniels to discuss the sign program. We were concerned with putting up a sign that would be attractive and enhance the overall appearance of the motel and surrounding community. I feel that I was misrepresented by Nancy Edwards and Rick Daniels. In fact, I was misrepresented. I told you our concern was to put up something that looked nice and would do a good job. I asked them what their recommendations were. They, at that time, stated to me that by the time that the permit for this sign would be approvod, the new sign ordinance would be in effect. So, they recommended that we design according to the new sign code. To the best of my knowledge, tite new sign code has not been approved at this point. I was given this permit last May. To be quite honest with you, I 'm a little bit put out by it because I'm embarrassed with my customer because I had some competition in there that was telling him he could do something else and I told him he couldn't do it because I was told by the City of Tigard that I couldn' t do it. So, I rave a little bit if egg on my face, and I think it was uncalled for. I think it was something that they told me that they had no right telling me. The purpose of the sign, as you well know, is to identify the motel - to tell the pub- lic where it is and to invite them to come in. That' s what it' s all about. The sign that we ended up with is too small. It does not do the job. The motel has been there since Sept- tember and the owner has had numerous complaints from the people that come in stating that they have had problems find- ing the motel, that they have driven by it three or four times because the entrances are not adequately .. arked. So, what we' re proposing to do now is to alter what I feel the hard- ships that the City imposed on us at that time by identifying the entrances to the motel. What we would like to do is place an entrance sign - you say they're six feet by five feet. In reality they' re about four feet by five feet and they're a couple of feet off the ground. What we want to do is place one on Pacific Highway to encourage the traffic before it gets to the motel to slow down and turn onto 69th Street. After they're on 69th, there would be another s..gn in Coco's parking lot to direct them into the parking area of the motel. The purpose that we aik for an eitrance sign on PC MTG 21/7,,78 Zone Chang•3 SCA 1-78/Wayside inn the secondary access road is to inform the public that if they miss the entrance, there is another entrance to the motel. It happened to me tonight as I was going to meet Mr. Lee at the motel. I drove past it. I was thinking about the meeting tonight and drove past the entrance of it. I think it is important to inform the public - not to encourage them, just inform them - that if they did miss it that there is another entrance to the motel. We 're not encouraging that as a primary access road; we' re just letting them know that if they missed it that there' s another way to come in just to make it easy on them. There have been numerous complaints from the people staying there because they have driven back and forth. The Pacific Highway is a busy street and it isn' t easy to turn around on, especially after dark and if you 're not familiar with the area. We do have a sign that is 5 ' x 14 ' and is off the ground, so I imagine you would classify this as a 14' x 12 ' sign. That sign states that there is an entrance on 69th Avenue. Well, I am sure we have all been in the position where we are in a strange town and don' t know 69th Avenue from 137th Avenue. That tells the public nothing. That doesn' t tell the public where G9th Avenue is. So, is my opinion, it tends to confuse the public. I feel that it is not an unfair request. I 'm sure there are a hundred things I thought about telling you that I have forgotten. 'that' s basically my feeling. I hon- estly do feel that I was given a raw deal when it came to issuing the sign. My client originally wanted to put up a large sign, as high in the air as he possibly could; and we ended up with the low-profile sign, something that I feel looks nice, but is just not doing the job. Mr. Lee has spend millions of dollars developing that land, and he has to have a return on it or else tl�ere is no sense in having a motel there. Now, I'm sure you have some que€tions. POPP: Mr. Pershing, fi:•st cf all, maybe I can shed iomh light. At the beginning you mentioned about Nancy Edwards and Rick Daniels leading you astray or not giving you the straight facts. Neither one of those people is here tonight. First of all, as you know, Rick Daniels is not on the staff any more. I think maybe a. littlo background might add some understanding to that. I think those people went out of their way in an effort to help you, rather than hinder you. I don' t think they misled you in any way, shape, or form. They informed you that we would have a new sign code ordinance undoubtedly in effect prior to the time you put that up. To the best of their knowledge at that time we anticipated having a new sign code or,linance in effect. If you followed the circumstances on the sign code o.dinance, when it came up for a hearing there was a lot of discussion about the pros and cons of it and, consequently, what we did was to form what was referred to as a "blue ribbon committee, " 2. PC MTG 2/7/78 Zone Change SCA 1/78/Wayside Inn which was people who were in the sign code business and other business people and Staff people, and so on. They all worked together and came up with revisions. This delayed the imple- mentation of the new sign code provisions for a considerable period of time. The point I wanted to make was I think both Mr. Daniels and Mins Edwards went a tong way in an effort to encourage you and to help you and to assist you rather than to hinder you. I don't think they misled you in any way, shape, or form. I don't think they threw the screws to you. I don' t like the implication that they put it to you because I don' t think they did. The people on the staff at that time went a long ways to try to help you rather than be a hindrance. PERSHING: It's late and I'm sure everybody is tired. I didn' t mean for it to come out like that. I'm sure thalt at the time they weze trying to help me, but the point is, when it was all said and done, that wasn' t the way that it could have been done. POPP: Would you have enjoyed it more if you had put up a taller sign and then had to take it down? PERSHING: No, I wouldn' t have. POPP: And then had to remove the sign in a few months? PERSHING: No, not at all. POPP: That would have been 3 lot more expensive. PERSHING: I 'm sure there would have been a longer moratorium than a few months. I didn' t mean to imply that they were lying to me. I'm sure at the time they had good intentions. I apo- logize to them. POPP: Is there anyone wishing to testify in Favor of this pro- posal.? POPP: Is there anyone wishing to testify in opposition? POPP: May we have the Staff Recommendation please? STAFF: Yes, Mr. Chairman. I 'm glad you spoke in defense of Staff b;�cause I was going to do the same, so I' ll leave it at that. The only other point I would like to make is that the free-standing sign code has been amended and passed by the City Council and is in effect. Based upon that, Staff recom- mends denial. POPP: Any cross examination or. rebuttal? -3. PC MTG 2/7/78 Zone Change SCA 1 -78/wayside Inn CORLISS: I have a question. When you were making your presentation you said you were going to have a slow-down point so that people would know they were getting close to the motel. Would you show us on that map what you were speaking about. PERSHING: Right here, as you know, is the free-standing sign for the motel. What we propose to do is locate a sign right under the "Reuben' s" sign to slow the traffic down be- fore they get to the entrance. What it would do is slow the traffic down to direct it onto 69th down into the parking area of Coco's, and then a sign here will direct the traffic up into the parking area of the motel. Simply, all we are asking to do is to tell the people who missed the first en- trance that they can turn into the secondary exit. We ' re not trying to encourage people to do it. We ' re trying to avoid a traffic hazard. I 'm sure we've all tried to turn around on this street at one time or another. It' s hard to do with the traffic, and especially if you 're not familiar with the area. So that' s the purpose. This is a sign that is .readable on both sides. It would have the "Motel Exit Only" on one side so it will not encourage people coming this direction to turn in here. It is well marked anyway with "Do Not Fnter" signs and eve.:ything else. CORLISS: That' s to tell the people coming to Portland that they are getting close to the motel. PERSHING: That' s right. It' s justto tell them slow down, you're getting cic3e to it. From a traffic hazard stand- point, it' s necessary to give them plenty of time to find the route they want to take to find the motel. The motel has been there quite a while now, and they've had one com- plaint after another from people trying to find it. A few people will keep looking, bi-t if you're like I am, if I miss the first one I keep going until I find a good motel. He loses a lot of business that way. Q UIMBY: On this road, the second one that you 're talking about, where you would have an exit sign that would be point- int towards Portland, where you're proposing that traffic going north can turn in there, to the best of my recollection that is only a one car lane. PERSHING: No. QUI14BY: Is it two? PERSHING: Right. It' s a well-paved road. a, PC M7'G 2/7/78 Zone Change SCA 1-78/Wayside inn QUIMBY: It's right there by one of the fill3_ng stations. PERSHING: It' s before you get to the filling station. QUIMBY: It' s where the traffic starts getting ready to pull into the station. Are you not possibly creating a hazard with people at the motel thinking this is an exit road. PERSHING: It is an exit. That's what it is there for. QUIMBY: Yes, but you' re posposing that people en•,.er there also. You're saying that it is an exit road, but you're having cars enter it. If some of the people .leaving the motel have imbibed just a little bit, are you not. creating a hazard for these people? PERSHING: These people are going to be a hazard no matter where you are. I don' t think so, because it is very clearly marked. . . . . tape changed here, some of question lost. QUIMBY: It' s got to be one way or the other. If you' ve got "Do Not Enter" what's going to happen to these people that come in? PERSHING: Some people are going to do it no matter what - no matter how well it is marked, or whatever. Phe State designated the sign program and it is very clearly marked. I don' t think it is going to create a problem. POPP: The original intent on this drawing showed this road to be coming up at an angle. It was specifically stipulated that this would be an exit only. I feel very strongly that, by posting any type of a sign, whether it is up here, or here, and so on, with the way this road is built, we ' re doing noth- ing more than encouraging this for another entrance. Now, as he stipulated, when you've got the sign for the Wayside Inn over here and "Exit Only, " if they don' t see "Entrance" and "69th" here, then they aren't going to see "Exit Only" down here, either. That' s going to encourage the use of this as an entrance. PERSIiING: The problem with the larger sign is that it' s back 90 feet off the road. It is hard to see at night. This sign is closer to the street and has a little bit larger letter that makes it easier to read. If I 'm not mistaken, this road was designated to be an entrance and an exit. 5. PC MTG 2/7/78 Zone Change SCA 1-7£3/Wayside Inn GOLDBACH: No. In Planning Commission and Design Review meetings we went over and over this. The road is definitely designated as emergency entrance and exit only. It was not supposed to be an entrar... . PERSHING: Maybe I'm wrong. WAY LEE: Originally designed by the State, it was supposed to be ingress and egress by the State Department in Portland. After that, Mr. Daniels said it would be better to encourage people going down 69th. Originally it was supposed to be ingress and egress out of there for motel use only. It would be a very natural tendency for a person to go into there easy by turning into the right and going up the freeway toward Portland. It was designed that way. I talked to the State and that's the way it was designed to have use for the motel only. POPP: I ' ll make just one comment. I' ll tell you why I 'm so clear and vivid on this point. I remember a great number of the members of the Planning Commission at that time were totally opposed to any road being up in this location - or even an exit. They were opposed to it. I was in favor of it only so long as it served as an exit. I pushed and pushed hard that this road would be an exit. On the drawings and on the map and on the plan this was an exit only, and the road swung up here at such an angle that it could only serve as an exit. That traffic coming up here did not have an opportunity to make almost a u-turn to cut back down. WAY LEE: No way. I ' ve never seen anyone do that.. POPP: Well, the way the road is designed on here now anO with the sign being posted he*-e I an, afraid that this is what it would encourage. WAY LEE: The State authorized certain things: "Do Not Enter, " "Right Turn Only, " going out. Coming in it is "Do Not Enter" a certain way. You can not come back in. POPP: The State has stipulated those signs be up there. SWAY LEE: We're trying to get a directional sign to try to help people - not an advertising sign. I ' ll tell you what happened in the month of January. We had 20 cases of people coming from the Greenwood Inn, trying to find the place at about 10 p.m. Some of them were trying to find it at 6 p.m. in the heavy traffic. They missed it and caused a safety hazard. One of these days someone is going to miss the place and go down the highway and try to turn around and get into a big a ccident and get hurt trying to find the wayside inn. I 6. PC MTG 2/7/78 Zone Change SCA 1-78/Wayside Inn have older people coming from out of town coming through there saying "Why don' t you have a sign there saying entrance so if we miss it we can go in?" We're not trying toget people in there. The regular people, like the salesmen, know the exit and they are going to come in there anyway. I'm talking ,about the older people from out of town sent by other motels that are full trying to find it. We know of 2u cases this month of people turning around down there and coming back. Two of them almost got hurt. They came in there all shaken up at around 11:00 p.m. I worry about that. POPP: Let me ask you something, Mr. Lee. A person is coming up the highway and doesn't see your sign. Suddenly he is approaching here and now he sees your sign, "Exit Only. " WAY LEE: It doesn' t say "Exit. " It does not say "Exit. " On one side it ways "Exit. " It gays "Entrance Only. " There's a split island there. There's a t;�ree-cornered island there. One side is "Right Turn Only. " POPP: Is this used for an entrance? WAY LEE: Yes. This one is used for an entrance. STAFF: No. That's what I 'm trying to pick up hire tonight. That is incorrect. I ' ve been confused by this whole thing. Now I realize what' s going on. It is a secondary egress only. It is not t- serve as an access egreps. You' re proposing an "Exit Only" and "Entrance Only" sign. WAY LEE: It is an entrance. rhe State says there' s an ingress and an egress. ci 'AFF: It doesn' t matter what the State says, Mr. Lee. It ' s what the Planning Commission required of that development, not what the State says it is. WAY LEE: The people told me at that time to go to the State and whatever the State allows us to do at that time was ingress and egress. You read the document. Ingress and egress is what it says on there. GOLDBACH: The only reason that we allowed that exit road there was that the loan requirement for the property said that he had to have a tie directly to 99W. STAFF: That is correct. GOLDBACH: That' s why we allowed that. 0"_`r.wise it would not have happened. 7. PC MTG 2/7/78 ?,one Change SCA 1-78/Wayside Inn ','AZ LEE: I have a report with access into S.W. Pacific ffighway to combine �.'.th existing Mobil exit point and be designated for right turn only into and out of the site approved by the State Highway Division, November 22, 1976. Article No. 1 by Mr. Rick Daniels. I ' ll read it. Do you want me to read it? POPP: Please just bring it over here. . . . some discussion, not clear on tape. POPP: Any further discussion? POPP: The motion has been made and seconded that it be denied based on Staff findings. Any further discussioA? POPP: If. not, all those in favor signify by saying "aye. " POPP: Those opposed? POPP: The motion is denied unanimously. i I a. r AGENDA T'.GARD PLANNING COMMISSION Februar.,r 7 , 1978 - 7: 30 P.M. Fowler Juntor High School - Lecture Room 10865 S .W. Walnut Street - Tigard, Oregon 1 . Call to Order : 2 . Rail Call: 3. Approval of Minutes: 4. Commun i c a t i.c r.s: 5 Public Hear ngs : A Staff Report. B. Applicant' s Presentation Public: Testimony: a, Proponent ' s b. Opponent ' s C . Cross-exam nation D. Slatf Recommendation E Commission Discussion and Action 5 . 1 ZONE CHANGE ZC 28-77 (Lutz) NPU 7 A .request by Art Lutz & Company for a general plan and pro- gram review of a single family residential planned develop- ment to _nclude 261 single family unit's and 126 attact.ad c .ngl.e family units for a 99 . 91 acre parcel south of Scholls Ferry Road between S..W. 130th and S.W. 135th (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 33A, Lot 500, and Tax Map 151. 33D, Lots 100 and 101) . 5. 2 MINOR LAND PARTITION MLP 15-77 (Kelleher) NPO 4 A request by Phillip Kelleher t.j appeal a condition requited as pact of an administrative action on a manor land par- titioning for a . 83 acre parcel located at. S .W. 78th and Pta.ffle S+- reefs tWash . Co Tax Map 1S1 36CA, Tax Lot 54001 - 5 . 3 CONDITIONAL USE AMENDMENT CU 30-76 (Wayside Inn) NPO 4 A request by Wayside Motor Inns to amend a condlticnal use permit with respect to signing for the secondary access point from Pacifi. � Highway (between the Mobil Service Station and Wayside Inn) north of S.W. 69th Avenue (Wash. Co. Tax Map ISI 36AD, Tax Lot. 6504) . 5 4 SIGN CODE APPEAL SCA 1--78 (Wayside Inn, NPO 4 A reques+-. by Ways ido Motor Inns foi a variance to Title 1.6 , Sign Regulation (Section 16 . 36 . 040 ( 3) (A)` Free Standing Siqns on a 3 15 aero, parcel north of S .W. 69th AVEni,e Wash. Co . Tax Map IS] :36AD, `Pax Lot. 6504) . All persons having an interest in the htarinq material are in ited to appear and submit oral and v7r i t ten t o s t.imony o, submit wr. i t t.en testimony in advance of the meetinn. 7 k MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION February 7, 1.978 Fowler Junior High School - Lecture Room 10865 S.W. Walnut - Tigard, Oregon 1 . Call to Order: The meeting was called to order at 7: :30 P.Ni. 2. Roll Call : _"rosent : Brian , Corliss, Goldbach , Quimby, Rossmart , Sakata, Popp. Excused Absence : Tepedino, Wood Staff: Laws, Chaidez 3. Approval of Minutes: The minutes of January 10, 1978, were not approved as they were inadvertently left out of the packets. 4 . Communications: None 5. Public Hearings : 5. 1 Zone Change ZC 28-77 (Lutz) NPO 7 A request by Amart Development Co. for a. general plan and pro- gram review of a single family residential. planned development to include 261 single family units and 126 attached single family units for a 99 .91 acre parcel south of Scholls Ferry Roar: between S.W. 125th and S.W. 130th (Wash . Co . Tax Afa.p 1S1 33A, Lot 502; and Tax Map 181 33D, Lots 100 and 101 ) . A . Staff Report : Read by 1,aws B. Applicant 's Presentation : Al Aenkendorf, 620 S .W. 5th , stated that ho would reserve his comments until after the staff recommendations had been given . C. Public Testimony : .Allen Patterson , 11605 S .W. Manzanito , vxpressed concern that the pare.ei 01' land which he owns wi 1 1 become lan 11 orkr.c' MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION February 7, 1978 PaVe 2 D. Staff Recommendations : Based on Findings of Fact and Conclusionary Findings, staff recommends approval of the general plan and program and zone niap amendment from Washington County RSI to City of Tigard R7-PD with the following conditions : 1 . That the bikeway and pedestrian plan as submitted be amended, according to the attached exhibit A, and in- clude the following: a. An 8-foot wide asphalt bikepath along the S.W. Scholls Ferry Road frontage. b. 8-foo` wide concrete bikepaths be provided along only the collector streets within the development . c. That the bikeway behind lots 10-14 be deleted. d. That an approximate 80-foot long bikepath from S .W. Glacier Lily Lane be provided between single family detached lots 9 and 10 . e . That a bikepath be provided around the east lake . f. That a bikepath from the area described as lots 161-164 be provided on the southside of the west lake where it would connect with the bikepath on the greenway to the east . g. That the bikeway be constructed within Phase I , to include Sc:holls Ferry Road, the bikepath around the east lake, along the south side of the west lake , and along the collector streets. h. That the entire greenway and bikeway system be sub- ject to design review and improvement plans for the areas marked X on exhibit "A" also be submitted ( to include benches, picnic tables, etc. ) . 2. That the "vision easement" between single family detached lots 14 and 15 be increased ; that an additional "vision easements" be provided between lots 11 and 12 (this can be accomplished by shifting lots 10 and 11 in a westerly direction) . 3. That single .family detached lot 64 be deleted and this area serve as a vision easement within the open space area. 4 . Lots 161-164 be deleted as single family detached homes , MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COAlMISSI0N February 7, .1.978 Page 3 and this 1. . ] acre area become part of the open space area and that this area be included within phase I . 5. That all cul-de-sac streets over 150 :feat in length be developed on a 45-foot radius . 6. That landscape islands be provided within the cul-de- sacs, and a landscape plan for the cul-de-sac islands be submitted for design review, and that maintenance responsibility for the landscape island be prescribed to the Homeowners Association . 7. That a cul-de-sac with a landscape island be developed on a 40-foot radius for single family attached lots 85-93. 8. That 5-foot wide sidewalks be provided along both sides of the local streets (deleting them within the cul-de- sac) . 9 . That covenants be attached to the deeds of single family attached lots 1 , 19-23, and 121-126 restrict- ing access from S.W. Scholls Ferry Road. 10. That street improvements for S.W. Scholls Ferry Road be provided per Oregon State Highway Division require- ments. 11 . That a bus turnout lane be provided along the S .W. Scholls Ferry Road frontage (exact location to be work- ed out between the applicant , Beaverton School District 48, and Oregon State Highway Division) . 12. That S.W. 130th be vacated between single family at- tached lots 85-88. 13. That the street tree plan and signing; program for the development be subject to design review. 14 . That no .final plat be recorded for any 'Lots within Phase I until such time as public sewer service is available to the site. 15. That all attached single family units be subject to design review. E. Rebuttal .Al Benkendorf, 620 S.W . 5th , Planning ContiUltant , stated that they concurred basically with the .intent of all the conditions, but differed in their implementation. Conditions MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION February 7 , 1978 Page 4 1 and 2 were acceptable, Conditions 3 and 4 caused the most concern. They felt that a significant, reduction from the original number of units had already been made and that the six acres of open space was plenty. Conditions 5 and 6 requiring landscape islands in cul-de-sacs was inconsistent and a solution should be worked out with the Fire District as to radii . Condition 8 would not be adhered to in only one instance (Glacier Lily Lane) where the sidewalk would only be along one side of the road in an attempt to create a rural , informal atmosphere. All other conditions were fine . .Darryl Dailey, 12420 S.W. Summercrest , expressed concern with the dike across the lake and the flow of water under it . .David Evans , 200 S.W. Market , Consulting Engineer , stated they would improve and maintain the dike, add to the re- tention capacity of the lakes , modify culverts under the (like , and raise the road level over the water . .Goldbach expressed concern over the fluctuating weir system and who would be responsible for it . .Evans answered the weirs would be enlarged and City of Ti- gard would maintain the :facilities as a public area. .Brian disagreed with deletion of lot 64 in that It would benefit only 1 or 2 other lots . .Evans .Mated a vista could be opened at lot 60 by decreasing the size of lots 61-64 . .Quimby was concerned with the soil stability and flooding. .);vans state; none of the lots encroached into the flood plain , that ti;oy hadn 't developed fragile areas, the drain- age problem had been addressed during the design process. .Brian questioned the elimination of sidewalks in the cul- de-sacs. .Staff stated that the Planning Commission on previous ap- plications had eliminated this requirement . .Staff further stated that the landscape islands, as recom- mended by staff, be maintained by a Homeowners Association. .Evans stated they had no intent for a Homeowners Association . .Sakata asked about sewer availability. MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION February 7 , 1978 Page 5 .Evans stated U..S .A . had the proposal and would begin con- struction, hopefully this summer. F. Commission Discussion : .Quimby was concerned with the city 's takeover of lake and flood control and felt the developers should be responsible. She also felt there was no need to eliminate lot 64. .Corliss felt city of Tigard should be responsible to assure that someone would take care of it and agreed there was no reason to delete lot 64; she also felt lots .161-164 should be retained for single family units. .Sakata was concerned (1) over the lack of school facilities, (2) with construction on soils near the lake , (3) with an open space area at lot 60 or 64 to answer boating concerns, (4) that the Planning Commission had deleted lots 161 -164 in the original. discussion , and (5) setbacks were too small . .Goldbach saw no reason to exclude lot 64 ; felt the cul.-de- sac idea was good; questioned the necessity of 2 sidewalks on Glacier Lily Lane and whether the city wanted to accept the open space area as park. .Brian felt lot 64 could remain ; lots 161-164 were okay to remain and provide housing on the lake; the area was in- accessible to the majority of the people - parking and ac- cess to the lake were a problem; the dike should be subject to the approval of the city ; setback should be subject to the approval of planning. .Laws stated recreational uses have not yet been established , but should be limited. .Popp stated lot 64 should remain ; lots 161.-164 would be better suited as single family homes than public access as this wasn ' t a good area for boating and should have only minimum use as such; the 40-foot radius for fire truck: was okay and landscape islands were gond; the schools were the responsibility of the public at large, not the de- velopers ; sidewalks need consistency and conformity ; the dike should meet approved :standards. .Laws; recommended revision of the following staff conditions: (2) that the "vision easement" between single family de- tached lots 64 and 65 should also be increased ; and that an additional "vision easements" be provido.d between lots Gil and 62 ; and that the phrase "to the Homeowners Associ- ation" in Condition 6 be deleted and the following wording inserted: "as part of the Declaration of Restrictions for Summer Lake. " MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION February 7, 1978 Page 6 .Brian moved for approval based on staff's recommendations and revised conditons and adding the following conditions: 16. That the design of the dike and flood control appar- atus be subject to city approval . 17. That variances from the setback requirements of the code be subject to the Planning Director 's approval . 18. That lots 161-164 be developed during Phase II as a public parking and recreation area. .Popp seconded the motion . .Quimby requested that the motion be amended to include an additional condition, (19) That soil stability tests be provided for lots adjacent to the lakes. .Brian accepted the amendment . '.Evans agreed to soil stability tesi.s . .Laws suggested charge of language in Condition 18, "develop- ment of this area be determined by the Park Board. " .Quimby expressed concern over the public paying to maintain a private lake. .Benkendorf suggested waiting to decide on 1>)ts 161-164 until Phase II of the development. - Popp clarified Phase II will be 1J-2 years. .Benkendorf suggested a management program from the City of Tigard to address some of these problems. .Brian changed his motion to delete Condition 18 and re- instate Condition 4 and adding, "development of this area be subject to Park Board review. " .The motion was passed 5-2 : Yes, Rossman , Corliss, Brian , Quimby, Goldbach ; No, Sakata, Popp. 5.2 Minor Land Partition MLP 15-77 (Kellehe r_) NPO 4 A request by Phillip Kellehr.r to partition a 1 . 77 acre parcel into three lots. 1 .22 acres, 12 ,600 square re(-- t , a::d 11 ,200 square feet respectively in a R-7, "Single family Residential " gone at S.W. 78th and Pt'al'I'l.e Streets (Wash . Co. Tax Map .1S1 36 CA, Tax Lot 5400) . A. Staff Report : MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION February 7, 1978 Page 7 Read by Daws B. Applicant ' s Presentation : .Phil Kelleher, applicant , explained the condition of the entire street as needing improvements and one little strip in the middle wouldn ' t improve the condition of the rest of the street. .Laws stated the city has been requiring non-remonstrance agreements for LID's alone; some streets , but this tends to prolong the need to improve upon an already poor situation . .Sakata stwted it was time to improve sub-standard streets. .Quimby felt not insisting on the improvements was setting a dangerous precedent and that LID's are not successful . .Kelleher explained the reasons for the voluntary annexation of this parcel of land to the city; that he wasn' t a developer; that he would be agreeable to a non-remonstrance agreement ; and stated the price range of the proposed houses. .Laws suggested making improvements only on the two northern lots. .Kelleher restated that the entire street needed improvements. .Corliss can ' t see the sense of only 100 feet of paving and wanted to wait for a LID; she felt each development should be ,judged separately. .Laws stated Kelleher could be credited if he improved the street now and the rest was done later under an LID; he felt the Planning Commission should provide Staff with a directive so that this could be applied to future develop- ments subject to administrative review. .Goldbach suggested referring to the City Council . .Popp felt it would be unfair and an unjust burden on one developer to force him to improve; that these were unusual circumstances that would justify eliminating these requi.re•- ments; that each case should be ,judged on its own merit ; that staff should continue to require curbs and sidewalks on all new development and if it was felt to be unjust , the developer could appeal . .Goldbach (,notion) recommended the street be developed in front of the two new lots on S .W . 713th with no curb or side- walk and nu improvement be made on Pfarfle . N1 NUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION February 7, 1978 Page 8 .Popp seconded the motion . .Quimby felt the improvement should be along all. three lots instead of leaving just one coiner. .Goldbach disagreed, saying the existing house should remain as it is. .Brian felt the motion didn 't incompass enough or required too much. .Tne motion failed, 7-0. .Popp moved that a half street improvement (no curbs and sidewalks) be provided along the S.W. 78th Avenue frontage, and that the applicant agree not to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district for the balance of the street improvements to S .W. 78th and S .W. Pfaffl.e Streets . .Brian Seconded . .The motion was passed 5-2 : Yes, Popp , Quimby , 13ri.n.n , Ross- man , Goldbach; No, Sakata, Corliss . 5 . 3 Conditional Use Amendment CU 30-76 (Wayside Inn) NPO 4 A request by Wayside Motor Inns to amend Condition 6 of a con- ditional use permit with respect to signing for the secondary access point from Pacific Highway (between the Mobil. Service Station and Wayside Inn) . (Wash . Co , Tax Map 1S1 36AD, Tax Lot 6504) A . Staff Report : Read by Laws B . Applicant 's Presentation : .Bob Pershing, Sales Representative, 436 S .E . 12th , Port- land, felt he had been misrepresented by staff who told him it new sign code would be in effect and constructed the sign according to the new code dimensions and the new code had not yet been passed. lie felt the existing sil;n did not do the job and the entrance was hard to find. The proposed signs are 4 ' x 5' and wor.ild indicate a secondary necess road to inform motorists or another entrance to the motel . .Popp stated that Air. Pershing wits not misrepresented by staff who actually went out of their way to assist him in every way possible and explained how the new sign code had been delayed. MI NUTI,S TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION February 7 , .1978 Page 9 .Staff stated that Mr. Pershing was in error, that the sign code has been amended by ordinance. C. Public; Testimony: None D. Staff Recommendation : Staff recommended denial . E. Commission Discussion and Action : .Corliss requested sign location on map by pershing. .Popp stated that the original plan stipulated the exit road be strictly exit with absolutely no entrance. .Way Lee stated it had been intended as both egress and ingress. .Popp stated the Planning Commission had been opposed at the time to the road being there at all . .Lee stated the proposed signs were needed for safety. .Laws stated the Planning Commission okayed the street only to be used as secondary egress . .Goldbach moved denial based on staff findings . .Quimby seconded and the motion pass-d unanimously . 5.4 Sign Code Appeal. SCA 1-78 (Ways_ide Inn . NPO 4 A request by Wayside Motor Inns for a variance to Title 16 , Sign Regulation (Section 16 . 36 .040 (3) (A) Free Standing Signs on a 3. 15 acre parcel north of S.W. 69th Avenue (Wash . Co . Tax Map 1S1 36AD, Tax Lot 6504) . A. Staff Report : Read by Laws B. Applicant ' s Presentation : Mr. Pershing felt he had covered the reason for new signs in his previous presentation . C. Public testimony : None MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION February 7, 1978 Page 10 D. Staff Recommendation : Staff recommended approval of the variances to the sign code as requested with the following conditions: 1 . That a site plan be resubmitted that indicates the exact location of the directional sign on the Coco 's Restaurant premie•Ps. 2. That a directional sign on the Plankhouse Restaurant premises be located south of the existing Plankhouse sign on S .W. Pacific Highway (exact location to lb,� determined during design review) . 3. That both directional signs be subject to design re- view. L . Commission Discussion : .Popp asked if permission had been received from Coco ' s and the Plankhouse to have the signs on their property . .Pershing verified that it had. .Sakata proposed the new signs be added as part. of the Plankhouse sign . .Popp stated the signs be subject to design reviem- . .Goldbach recommended approval of the variance based on staff recommendations. .Quimby seconded the motion . .The motion passed unanimously . 6. Other Lasiness: 6 . 1 Sign Code : The recommendation of the Sign Code Committee was presented by staff. Popp questioned the definition of "outdoor advertising sign . " Laws stated it was er-sentiall,y billboard, and also said a hearing was needed to review the sign code and verified the public hearing date of February 28 . 6 .2 iloskinson Variance: MINUTES TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION February 7, 1978 Page 11 Laws stated that Paul Hoskinson had previously applied for a variance (V ].1-77) on street standards and having been denied was seeking a new direction to which to apply. Popp stated Hoskinson sho,.id apply for a P.D. as these were unusual circumstances. 7. Adjournment : The meeting was adjourned at 11 : 20 P.M. STAFF :DEPORT AGENDA 5.4 TIGAU PLANNING COr-MISSION February 7, 1978 Fowler Junior High School-Lecture Room 10865 SW Walnut Street-Tigard, Oregon Docket: Sign Code Appeal SCA 1-78 Request: For a variance to Title 16, Sign Regulation (Section 16.36.040 (3) (a) and 16.40.040 (e) free Standing and Off-premises signs of the Tigard Municipal Code. Location: 11460 SW Pacific Highway, Wayside Motor Inn (',,lash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 36AD, Tax Lot 6504) . Applicant: Bob Pershing (Security Sioms) I. ^indings of Fact: 1. The site is zoned C-3 General Commercial and designated General Commercial on the Tigard Community Plan, 1971, and Highway Commercial on the NPC #4 Draft Plan. 2. Section 16.34.020 of the Tigard Municipal Code Variance Qrantin? states, "The Planning Ccmmission may grant a variance rom t e provisicns of this title based on findings that due to practical difficulties, undue hardships or inconsistencies :with the objectives of this tialc, the strict or literal inter- pretation and enforcement of a specific requirement hereunder should be waived or modifies?. " 3. Section 16. 36.040 (3) (a) states that "one multifaced free- standing sign identifying the principal golds, products, facilities or services available on the premises shall be permitted on a.ny premise. 4. Section 16.40.040 (e) states that "no off-premises sign shall b,� permitted in any commercial or industri-1 ^one, except outdoor advertising signs, as regulated in Section 16.40.090) . II. Staff Obsarvatirr_g and. Findings: 1. The applican t l z site Flan indicates the proposers location of two 5 foot wide by 6 foot- high directional signs; one -it the southwest, corner of S,-1 69th Avenue on tha Pla_r?shouse Restaurnrnt site, and the other at the antrarc� of Ccco's Rest�urart (upper tter par'_:;ng lot) . "_'hese two signs would idniltif;; the �iayii.cl:, Motor Inn .art also have the 1vord "enter" ;vith an ar-o:-! directing traffic to the e:"cDAR (OR COVIPARIP13LE -ranES', TO Lei IVS7Ai:.Le,0 ON 0' C V'4T1:' -%LON 0 Wirm OTHER IlLAN rf fN ,,, i10 Got, V 4 At- t, clk,It 41" flit JIM 'it t A• P, ;1%,,t "' k,0� wo, Al zoo 41, 'k. '4 wi , Pilk 12: z -7 -7-w� LIV4 IVY ? Car r:1 14 *% SIP 4w, rt , 111 -_7 - — rt -1 rya e h T1 t V, ,�All e x I S*C, 4 OAK WE a NA S M4 A AM- Z, J11 . A( Cj< X 1 .1 P - - - - - 11� fes..... \r -oj- '-L AIM; X, TO D E E,(C/1%D V ZTO Cl-r- rof'4 4\_ 0 ♦ OAK F'v ru 1z E U se L).CT6 p1A I 0\ Loc '100111Z� AL 6y!S7'G G 1 1, 1b r ;)A J, ' 4 .. V, - fr• vl + I �t •-'" 1'Z. I er Z�f At Xyy k, -Aw 3AtZK 1 ,4 ,W11 fk,(C- GRASS Ar r4eA/7' A A k.. za� dA\ tip At • Fl 13 I.AQGC- 1240C r2, 2 /14 ID ?( T 71 _4 -4-A Q. J,; C) /93 ENGI-I ski IV' ' P I t4(S 0,:;U 67 L A G ttZ S W 6 s-T G j)'-,)I GULDEN TIr N i'a)I�V-i r U 1.4 1 IAC 14 L i OTI t'q A `Y,, rot-. i 4L OTTO L V#1LN til(.11's"EL S &4 01 F-,j�L 1 .5 1.1 VV cTE b C vT-rlA C 7- —Mai, NOTE IF THIS MICROFILMED rr 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE r) THF QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL __ DRAWING. OE 62 92 LZ 92 S2 10 2 EZ 22 12 07, 61 IR I 11 91 GI t,I EI 21 11 01 -6 9 1 9 S 1l?_ 'E 2 111111 11 1111111111tilill I IIIIIIIIII III Ill III IIII Ill I IIIIIIII Ill Ill IIIIIII IIIII ill if Ur MICROFILM SERVICE CO. Commercial Microfilming, Processing & Supplies MAY 2 4 199 1 Portland, OR. Seattle, WA. A.J ! A L STAFF FEPOgT AGENDA 5. 4 TIGAPO PLANNIN C0 DUSSIC.1 Pa,e 2 2. used on the submitted site plan, staff cannot determine how the proposed directional sign on the Sal 69th Avenue and Pacific High- way frontage would relate to the existing nlankhouse sign In the same location. 3. Section 16.36.040 (3) (b) (1) and (3) (c) (1) of the Tigard .1%nicipal Code, Commercial and Industrial Zones states that "Free-standing signs shall be permitted. or property honed com- mercial or industrial and fronting on an arterial and collector- street ollectorstreet shall be subject to the area limitations as defined in those sections. 4. The applicants proposed directional sign or, the Pacific Highway and SW 69th Avenue frontage would came under the signing limitations for arterial streets, which is a maximum of 70 square feet per face or a total of 140 square feet fcr all sign faces. The applicant is proposing an 18 square foot sign at this locaticn. the directional sign to by lo<,ated on the Coco' s restaurant pro- porty would be subject to the signing limitations for collector streets. The maximum square footage for free-standing signs on collector streets is 25 square feet per sign face or a total 50 square feet for all sign faces. The applicant is proposing an 1F; square feet sign at this location. Staff cannot determine, based on the plot plan as submitted, if this sign would exceed the square footage limitation. III. Conclusionary Findings: 1. No indication has been given in the applicant' s submission as to why he proposes to locate Lhe entrance sign on the Plarkhouse site at SW 69th Avenue and Pacific Highway, as opposed to the Cod' s site and how this sign would relate to the existing sign- ing for both restaurants. Therefore, the applicant should re- submit for design review arproval, a signing program that gill not conflict with existing signs on these two premises. 7. Ry locating a directional sign for the '.-layside Inn on the Plank- hc�a c restaurant site, but south of t� existing restaurant sign, Ivol.11d allow motorists the opportunity to read this sigh and respond in Rufficient time to turn at the SW 69th Avenue egress. A directional. sign on the Coca' s restsurAnt site, (upner tier parking area) would also assist motorists in locating the morel to the Past. STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.4 TIGARD PLAA'NING CO:MISSION Page 3 IV. Staff Recommendation: Based on findings of fact and conclusionary findings staff recommends approval of the variances to the sign code as requested with the following conditions: 1. That a site plan be resubmitted that indicates the exact location of the directional sign on the Coco' s Restaurant premises. 2. That a directional sign on the P1ankhouse restaurant premises be located south of the existing Pl3nkhouse sign on SW Pacific Highwa (exact location to be determined during design review. 3. That both directional signs be subject to design review. s. _ � . .�,� _ . .. ••� • .__ -.•� � �•`_ ;1 ; - � r - ... .�._._..: �_^�.'...' • fit �.• .. �...C 1 "3 1 T C_� I L• U S L.... _'►J �, -�� _ < 111 � j;:�• - .- '^'3v► �..-.� �; ;� . . _ _ rte- , - . . _ - r t I ET 57- ----r ,• . . SUBJECTITES '•-,tom,-� t � ..�.F- �,t � '� l - rL- q.�� r �' ': � I / / ...tit .+•«� V�'.�"✓''�,�.�J '. 7. k\" DS r i INN t ~� Inn FJ9 . 1 06 AbW IL tu A AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) Y County of Washington ) s: . City of Tigard ) I , Bonnie Martin, being first duly sworn, on oath depose and say: 1 a That I am Secretary For the Planning Department For. the City of Tigard, Oregon e That I served notice of hearing of the Tigard Vlan- j ning Commission of which the attached is a copy (Marked Exhibit A) upon each of thp,- following named persons on the day of 197 , by mailing to r.acff-of them at the adoress s of ' on the attached list (Marked Exhibit: B) , said notice as hereto attached, dos/ted in the United States Ma=il or, the day of 197_2 postage prepaid. Subscribed and sworn to before me on the C� 1 -TH day of "4411111:J" Notary c of Oregon !ly{y�audission expires: CITY OF TIGARD P.O. Box 23397 12420 S.W. Main Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Property Owner: The agenda enclosed for the next meeting of. the Tigard Planning Commission in- cludes an item (circled in red) which, due to its location adjacent property owned or o.:cupied by you, or due to your previously indicated interest, the City feels obligated to notify you. If you wish to make your views known in this matter, or if you only wish to avai_1 yourself of this opportunity to be informed concerning this project, the Tigard Planning Commission invites you to attend this meeting. N 0 N N IVI fN- r - N N Nr-<•J�N - _ - _ r O. _•CNf _M•'M- - M M _ _ .. ; .. - - .pp. _ - - .. - .. b �m r r rM J n nISMN ^ h N ^ NIO > Z� rm2 M-n ryr r 2 ZO f rl� yryIryr�� N mmO r a^ 2 M ZJ mmm P_.�'C�•�.If�CW'-r-ip m N MOr M M r N1 N PN NP TIDO ND N r1 M1a I,n 9 OtUj�M U � N �N m SPm �N_ NN N O_ P � INn �MNy M1 y 70 reF MOS• M 2 � R b Ooh r0^ r O f N P C O�6 P P�NIa'N f N Q IM� N R' M m a Q WmrmO mmM ND N 11�� N U O - fN N CI N �Ptirmr--f•'C NrrryOry��OMh O C N P C[-Y ry �•' _ ` � I O P �6 ZmP mOrOrl P� S mNi PP PPnIO 1UP CM OIO hP1N1��i Pryd i i ) oNM1fN m �c M1 � �'l D POro LmI,I ��Q GP�m1nm_OPm �Ni 6 r o�<y�ufo ISQo af.- < a n f ~ �• m $ m °z i Q 6 O OQQ Q O D O WW Y < O [ F 8 JJ ddb 2 p oo oo CR.OQ of O o < 0. > c opo o [c 1 O QJrtO N<4 IY�iI Q �� I16QNr• K Q S�'�. - t. 1t> � 0 �' a <I Q � J _I"`LSr1- !!F C�Q Q Wi QQ¢�pr it .1 U [ +I Y O pQ WI[�t Nt<6, JLIJ><>J O C WmWl • - yN�J� 6�ia� ... Y <0a<I- ay. W-W Eu a0 Y I t ! -:'IWO* 7SI YNiy~y11 N T i~ �6 >o 1!�a 1 TT p - 7f!>D' O 7 W�J�OW��-u>J20 Jr"Y <i IIO > I JN LRRR111R V�i ]t L i - -Ol1kJf ;<D:(Z yybWN� mJ IC RIJNOYO i I. V N y y V1 an(¢¢J IIbpp OY•.�.r1'-. Py Vi _ - Dm�'N�� IQNANy•NfI•)yy J`M Om PYNryWa N- ICrN� .�=f•Q�p Zr^ Y t - .. O-N� OV nI��Yh LO lkai M1wO m Nm- M mm ZZZ 4 i.m i u�u' ]7 Cp r Nr r�r. <M fe <r M1IP ro <m 16�)m;am0-ym�mrN� w6D 6Uf ODW D O M N O IIOpp O p p Op O ~ A O b P O D W M M � M rym rym I®V Cryy 1lpy 1',Nm m Iyy IQy m N N N T IP P IP P BVI 01 _ ala • I� I<p Ip �<p Ip < f I<p �p m pp m ��mQ _- ____.I_p-y_� .p ._-_ --_ Ip '<^ < Ifp t �<p IN y tl rMy N M M M O N M r•� '^ M �M M M n r •II wl0i (! IO n M '� IRw .: b M < M O F n I d _O M� •� y b � 4 v N ry J U O u c. O O O O a O O O � N N N N N _ N N N o�� P�e 'N N ly N �I+4 �N N N Nti�_y-N N r- ry O�N fy y O�O L•. N N N N N _ N _ x I. _- a u m &' x a Q a s '¢ c I¢ E •1 S ry h r< < < � O : t < .f. pp�11 'V 't J �; .<. I ) U l � IU U li, r M N N - N N M N r ry �, L N I� � I � 1_ MMM 1I,'1 - 4� y� y W I~• O • )r rpo r pt Inan iN O I�0 m IG N .. ry n•_ h I'• m I� � O rn1 � n n h 'h N Ir O n N � � � P e O O N N N N N J (D - 111 _ r W a! r m O n N _ m I(1 m S M �n r •V f 'V I.. f m = IM' b r a! r 1+ r mM - •• f _ � .. � .. .. .. _ RI _ N n .. IV .. ry� IIV N _ N - rf�� I WWW j� - P � m �n n I� fu O -• M 001 I !• - � me - @ N' • qq � __. m .. rl IP N M1 b N N •- r+ - r m IO • m m " 10 N f _ .. ry - Oj N 1• _ N rr ioninen jm D NM •g,,. _ _ ,ly rl MMFaaa �i Im nnN�, u+ a ,n u m m �, rI n u �r � n in -Pr1 b N1NN N �� ,• ._ �e O --. _. y. Ip � Itf� N (m m�rI � rl m N b0 Y+ i b YI N m m 10 1 IN�f N 4.+ N N _ N I N 7dwJ'N_ N _ N 1 N N N N MN N N Cm¢�.9YY� - M e N� M -yi, ..�. O} 4 MI - N n.33., f• n r- yP- h. Y1. , I >t " IO ..Irtll_ M rn1- ZMri - Mef M T FP11 Om Yna�NW ^ P•m+n 01 �PIPO faf NI+ N n r' n NN II`JJJ Q tr� y1J ��yy �yy � II 1y y� 1y� []T' 1[- WSI1-=L 2 W•+S 2 JyOyI~ NjWyj {{f�V yy ..II Y/ r.JMt kt Uu [�JU�p~Q4p y1 JI`[06- �I[il u6•fr.I¢y •yfai 1•JaN6M 4N f � !. - I'�O..t [)WP./P3 f••�r t f CI-QUI JI^U 111111 2 Q < L.T •t.l L4 JN J ria I • 1 ' � ' - I iw�m�. +"� �� I K•7 •rJ 3� °- J•O�r 11.' b .�..�•�•� 1 .4 .�,h� � f � • �_ I.,. 1 !� A 1 f � � I I� ` ! [ e.t�'` r t r y N1L".+eM�rtMM.ro',.�gyl�Irl:t+^•'91Aw�,yRyr;Fr1�,:• -__! � �,�j!, I�1�'1yIrYdJri'-11��Pg1'w •1�FA�Ik� � 4 _.. yA � � <tbryw��."�V.li'�'�+�"kTMt'^ '`} � {p+r � X �;`� �' t •�I 1r ./ .-�- � III •� - �-'•rNr � ' _- O y r N N _N �- C ^p O lil 1 ,. y-N N —_� � - O O ,- O �.O -- -- +_ _ f f f J S• � + f � � � 6 � , n 1 < _' � <I t I J I I + � " � p- �.� .D-�•'n O m O 1` `• � � • � � M N i _ o January 18. 1978 City of Tigard Variance Committee Members of the Committee: The purpose for the additional signage is simply to help direct traffic into the Wayside Inn, They are having problems with their c,,stomers being able to find the motel , because of its location. We would like to be able to place a directory sign on 69th Avenue to direct traffic off of Pacific Hwy. , then one to direct traffic off of 69th to the parking lot of the motel . We would also like to place another sign on 66th Street. We are finding that the location of the existing sign is confusing. Your serious consideration of this matter would be deeply appreciated. Thanks, SECURITY SIGN, Robert Pershing Salesman 436 S.E.TWELFTH AVENUE PORTLAND.OREGON 97214 (503)232.4172 ZONE CHANGE CONDITIONAL I ' - '1F�IPURARI' i. `F - NON-CONI;OR1•iING USE REQUESTS APPLICATION File # $CO2. r� Receipt # s/0 Tigard Planning Commission 639-4171 12420 S.W . blain St . , Tigard, Oregon 97223Date Recd.- --�--�-- - By PLEASE PRINT IN INK OR.'TYPE` Action Requested--LLAk.,L`----7�p ,� _.Q. X Applicant ' s Name _. / L __. It .SLQ��o� Phone :Z3.Z-Y/7-� f� ,z Applicant ' s Address / �i.._�, _�cr�-__ �°.•_-41 R y) ( street city)(state) (zip) owner ' s Name_ A .5� _ _/ /�� ZAl Phone Owner ' S Address _ ---- '-W_ L?�_175._LJ� '�( s'ta)- (zip19 —T-- Address Applicant is : Owner_ Contract Purchased Developer_ Agent Other Owner Recognition of application : - - -----r-------- signature of ow Personresponsible for - y�3� s t.ate) —.� ._( zip) -- ( street ) }PROPERTY INVOLVED: Tax Map # Tax Lot( s)� Address Area ( Hoes) Existing Buildings (# and type)_- Current zoning irrent Use Appl ica.nt. ' s Applicant ' s Proposed Zoning__________-- - .-- Proposed Use_ __ --- -- ------_._ _ -----.---_.— SUHI•IISSION - �^ �- _ Title Report _"Fasano" Requirements RyQU I REMLNTS : Le�gnI DE�tic:ription .- Vicinity Map ~Tax Alap _ _--Site Development Plan Site Plan G�/ �� = i��'�- �. ,/ �_ -- . ' — .__� _ - � ': . i i��....' ► s - � �..+�_ "rte:.----. --.. C N EiTIC3 N A L USE '3-0- IT _ - f 7- L dr i r+l f s �. 1 _ ; e 'C3 s t ►� SUBJECT SITE f � ��--•.r.—•T+—�:.�a. —7 s w I -.__.-�.-.__� "i-RibR.!�� ice✓.._n`��r•i.��'T`.i'S:_^.� , J(-- ET 3 --__--_ _ ��,� ��1—.��•�s J L_1 _._1.