The URL can be used to link to this page

15905 SW 116TH AVENUE 5468 RKB BOWMAN 6IVI51014 OF AUTOMATEC BLDG CCMPCNENTS SEATTLE , Oq . oc= ` tel ti 0� �- r r- I r1 r• q Q 14!!F P r r i G • O ' I•R= •1- T • R O - , T` 'F _-h W _Eh ) 1MEMBEII, !� O q D S E P, "OhC �qG ,!�._ . .._. ..,N MEMOR FCRCE 4011 015P 3LOPE. :� Ll 413 MEMBM C191 JT L05 1 HLi3 20 4- CXIZ. 4 15 C7 (14- 1 ) aq--TC iLD9i FT -?N--5X CFPT4 IN iPLF) aq -•T0 �! D` :1 1 - 3 2Y 6 h0. c C. F '9 -!.A/1C!T :CR 1,'i. ! = c5 p ;9 2 IN02 20 4 CX 4. 5 2. 50 ( 2-14) 4 11Z5 3- 6 ZY. 6 N0.2 0. 07R -LAgC4 3 HP 12 20 4. 0X 9. 0 2. Z5 t 2- 3) 1 - 2 80@BC, 5 -- 6 - C 6. CCO 115. 5 2 -i 4 2I57T 5 i i 25 6 - 10 2Y. 6 N0. t C. "A -!-AfIC4 C I T ^H. ! L- C. q 5F 4 IN1 1 20 3. OX 6- 9 2- 2 7070C 5-- 5 - 0 6. CCC 115. 5 2 -13 1021C 0- 1 2Y 6 No. , 'q -LAMC4 CL= :5 P50 5 INOZ 20 (o'OX (9.5 2. 25i 5-11 ) 3 -- 4 7747C 4- 1 -- 0 0. OOO 115- 5 3-13 71 ..T TCTq' L OAC= 4? 1511 6 HIP 12 20 4. OX 9. 0 2. 251 6- 7) 4 - 5 7747C 5- 2- C C. Coo 115. 5 3 -12 2'+757 A! t_ WE85 2X 4 aTC. -FF TTF!! D. ` -1 RAI 7 IN02 20 4. OX 4_5 2. 501 7- 9) 5- 6 7747C 4 - 1 - 0 C, CCC 115. 4 -12 16590 So9r?NG3 41- ?N. 8 41-13 20 4. 11X12. 4 . 25 2. 07 ( 8- 9) 6- 7 70700 5 - 5-- C --6. 000 115. 5 5--12 11 9 IN11 20 2. O?: 2. 8 7 -- 8 80880 5- 6- 0 -6. COO 115. 5 5-11 1651C IPOP UT CFO' . ' /24C 10 IN02 20 4. OX 4. 5 2. 25 ( 6-10) 8__ 9 72341 5 - 6- 0 C. CCC 52. 5 6-11 23757 z ,, -- ,,.,._•. ! I IN02 20 4. OX 4. 5 1 . 151 5-11 ) 9-10 7234T 5•- 5 - 0 0. CCC 52. 5 6-10 71.17 �`;' ?{ t�l 1'° IS l.NCRFA5E5 ,oFv °hT . 12 IN03 20 4. OX 7. 9 2. 75 ( 3-121 10 1 6324T 4 -- 1 - 0 0. COO 52. 5 7-10 1021C ` t { - 13 IN02 20 4. OX 4. 5 2. Z5 ( 3-13; 11 -12 7747: 5- 2- 0 0. CCO 52. 5 7 - 9 287, �.FRO �� +� � J,, � � , T-'4 L 5- C ec►,-L5- 'C 14 ?N11 20 2. OX 2. 8 12-13 6324T 4 1 - 0 0. 000 52. 5 +� D!V: AIR K!NG 13 -14 7234T 5- 5- 0 0. 000 52. 5 t ,, _ P. O. BOX - PHGh',E: 639-111 NA!L VALJES �P3I , 35FLICE5 14- 1 7234T 5 - 6- 0 0. COO 52. 5 t G`i CHc9c3 A£?5 11 -i2 SP 10 20 4. Cx 6, e ='I"1�'��4-' - - 1.' `' TIGARD, Ol2Cv0N 97223 MAX MIN MAX M I tb : L -12 3!'10 20 4. CX 6. 8 +++ DESIGN CONSISTS OF 2 TRU55E5 BUILT 3EFAMA+ gLY +4+ 2C 163 142 163 142 +++ THEN NAILED TOGETHFR WITH I(OD NAILS 3TAGGERED w++ DESIGN SPECS. ACCORDING TO JNIFOMM +++ THROUGHOUT BOTH FACE5 AT 12 INCHES ON CENTER +« * `M' j -i BUILDING CODE. 1979 ) t'. �. .I � � R FABRICATION INSPECTION TO B£ PROVIDED MAX. PURLIN SPACE= 7. 6 FT. 4AX. UNDRACED DCI . CH. . .:N. ZC. 0 FT. � �•y•� � �� IAM 3EC i I ON 25. 1739 iA l 'UBC 5 T gNDARD 25-17 _ _ FLY e<C07 7`�; r2. , ♦..✓ i� rte' ,�' 115 08 96(x: a 1. -.� 66 E�E ri r •'r 5 2 F��l-••r...•••., NAt c s BOTH PACE S . I 4 i 3 N Y�>�o LC.. v a 3� PLYWOOD 4�___ 9:)c- ;�� APPROVED MTH llu;�t',�Cf ��i J NOTED, B E 7 E EN =�L� rel"i=I•I �3E RS - - ,. Y - SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH �-�� CONTRACT DOCUMENTS- [3] [�.J Nd.CUiUCT ;S CDNTFAi;,ORS f1ES+sOMSIBrUVY S- /S_ 8-/ ------ BRUCE A. SAMUELSON A.I.A. o _ �� ARCHITECT NOTEo 1.-0I OT DRILL E250LT" 35 N.E. 11th, P4Tiiarui, OR 91 ;"7 oe 0 ' ES �N mss . � I 1 G!1o59 eRc a 14 r 13 12 11 10 JT ^FACT IN-3X i 1 4079 5- E e 4079 5- 8 i CAMBER- 0-3/5 9 -- 2- 0 -------- f OVER TME WALL HEIGHT = 2-14 P YAFw" #jjL NOON 7m ?� AM=18 - •' TS OM/l!t AMMITIED "aDATA NOW Am *! 111040MAf1OM HEREON It TM FIPOFfRTr OF AVTOMATFO AL1, LATSAAL E ME011to tt POP /IA AM E11M+UFACTUIIEO MI VAMO MW = A AWKLA/M,�E.O1 RIR AMETEK,�OTTESVILLE. 1 OPM1r ATS POP IIT OW""GoWellNfi ITR. AND KOT NTo K oonu!111 WHUA OR IM MAT 011 URD t'AACRI/O INDIVNIM IRS MEMBERS AND ACODPOAMCE WITH I" comm mft owm AM AI �LE.JaMUF _LO WOR.LOOK IIp1 MAX MAPIILA, 11Ep Rw FOIIDlS HIED OW IMIN1JTHOfflno ElEttrO1TAf M OF 111E ITEMS DISCLMO IRPE'M.OR III ANY OTHER MUST IN IMSTAUN PLATES WM M ONVALL01 1111DTH FACtSOF ' W000) II01PlCl0810 E1IAEAUE1MRt0Et, CITr.tOAr.INK111E.10114"TO. �{ Ih AIM TD OW q"4= +oM Oa lis WOR"JON101 rMAO DMDIIMATIOM T9 OTNIft WEE MACK 10111MN1MMO.AnE TO 0 TM LUMP TJ"MTM 9%ftT WODED MD wir 40 OF "a ERE w ) ISP THIS®MI0101101 EMALL 0 VWF 90 Sr TILE 068101EIIN OF TM COMA TE tOUALLY SP*=ALOW 19 L80671A PLAM 4111RT 0 IM TM Ems,wqE AND CA 00 90M EIM1 MO TEES L A TnAM E Jl/q l aMom almoomm am AEEL+m To a LAT �1r doom iDltllL t0 40 calm 1MtN OATS JOB NUME R A MIN ALL WXMAIIYODMMOUWAatMwIOW"SAM01r1EW""POOMVM E10►L1r INSTMINM OV PKArMwD. IVP 41"N 10 "ll '•AUTOMOW #SIE 0ET1ML CHARTER MEMBER ��• NuR O> NATAL& �R AT Prima sewsw nOF THE cowuv1 OtPIR:111Pt$WON tom"mcowamw L�At+(il/l1MG MATOPtA1l NET POP M�IITIONE OF jam 1TIIIlS ANO POwOT{ 1V A11D POOK"kV IMMEB,p. PEAO ALL A "N OE!MDN COMM LOOM HOME DOES HOT MEET idCAL skxua @ CODE NE N gt%* T OF LATOEiAL 11110CM16 ATR PLATE LOW1010 MOTION PLANED DRAWING NUMBER 1 ESS NO11lOM Atte DESIGN A�EO� INp1CyiT1jD aY 1R IVI1r.11OAAl 1111AIC11Ir MR TW OVERALL CALLY AllWT JORM UNLESS OWN"011EE�gIIA771PZ," M ItlfIp1ATE0 NONdAR TS INC swWwOES No DOMTRIaI MRN TUTS SFALEn AUTOMATED SUILDING G'M/OMEtort we 11TU 7VP! K TO 0 P111WI D tr THE Of APE S11011N EdFIEp AAE III C�Of >�AOCE1►rs Mp SDR TME iAPP1iYf� HINOUMG K At�1g1nNG OMIT TM STRA/oWAL DESIGN OF TMF UNIT V<W14 ON TMf OAdl$OF DATA S INEa OF THEOollLm onmcnRE I fAMFOPWTrgmw THE CUOI'om AMDigM�ON TMIsORAWMG uTEST REwstON ORIGINATING QFfICE MIAMI Uec ( ^ /`��C AMD T►1 `(•/ V 9{::)5 b :I. :I. i., .I_I..4 (-:)1{11 I::.:1\1(J E poll • t - �,.T ._ i`.«r � ...._... ,.,..rrf. _ .. r .. _ =. .._-.:� - �tiI!llRfitw _ - ,n."..tJIA:- rr.+.. tiiF'.r.k WiwW:. _ W •M+,..._: _ mololow" 01M�..M.r•rw...wr-+.fir+-..�r..rr. • 1 _,1 ! . ♦ , � . ,'e. ..,v,- •'ll►"1-•-.. . �uI'•'. .,� ,♦,. w:. ...--�.�.,.q.•. . J•�„ ._.pr i.•. rir.�.rW:. -:.�w.�+„y„ ..-.. . ......-. _ _. _. 171• '1� I 111_ �Ii 1�T1III II 'i �l 1 i til III ili 1 r9l ili I � I' � I I � I IIl i � l 1 1 r � i rlr � r � r � i i � i � � li � i � r � rli 1 � I � �erlr � r � i1 � � � � � rlrlrlr � y ' i � � � 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 NOTE : IF THIS MICROFILMED DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOT IQk;-TT IS DUE TO f _QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL OE 6Z 9Z lLp 9,7 SZ to Ez Z2 1Z 0Z 61 91 11 91 51 bl EI ZI II 01 6 9 1 9 9 b E ,/J ��Illurririlrlrrrrirrrrlir�ri�+�rl�rrr�rrr�)11111►�11�tlrrE�r��u ��wl��rrrira�Ira��t�t�tt�t�rt�t�lltt+tfr�s111� �� 1. ::; 1111��#I�Igt111111�11t1�111t�111111�1�i11lIIl��11�lllrrrrirrr11111111111�1��1'�1I1��U�la�l�llulllllll..■■Mi`il'I.u�ltit� - _ APRI 0 1 992 -•Mft"W/- - --A6�rw .•iit'r:`�".M� �♦ . u. ib . *7.04 ., .. . - .. w n w J16 t ' i No exception taken ❑ Make correctiuns noreu Z r, «t Rejected ❑ Revise & Resubmit /\ Submit Specified Item Ll OR01931 \/ s f '. Checking is only fur general conformance with'tL, .,l �, BRUCE A. =.,r.'�ili L U;J A.I.A. _ concept of the Nroject and gea:ral n�5cr.. v;, l�/�. c`r 'h it. ARCHITECT' t inti,matiun givon in tha LC.1114t , a,,,iotf APPROVED lrITH CORRECTIONS NOILP, i �`J shown is subjaa to Inc reycirem.' its �?f �l; ��;• ;;. �, S08lECl 10 COMPLIANCE WITH specifications. Cuotra�:tur is feSaWt L:3 i.:, fj r�:.;t5'Lr, CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. " which shall he confirmed and currel;,teJ oj tit,: j,D AI;CUNAl7 IS WatAAL.neS pLSPONSIHIIItY fabricat'en processes and te.;hniques of cotistruai.n. Lo- 4-23-6/ ordinaticq of his work with that of all other trades and the BRUCE A. SAMUELSON A.I.A. satisfactory performance of his work. ARCHITECT / 35 N.E. 11th, Portland.OR 9123 BURGSTHHLER/HOLMES ASSOCIATES ' STiRTURAL EN ! Eby RECEIVED- t APR2 1 1981 BURGSTAHLER/HOLMES ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 1 • APPROVED with ❑ No Exceptions ❑ Changes as Noted This drawing was chocked for dimensions, quantities, compliance with job specifications and required codes, t 5ic+nature---- , Date _ ❑ Not npprovcd•Resubmit-Modify TbQ _ The follotivin.n su�oorZ7 PPeFA S H IP F�ANeCt:1 N L b45TEM • i� � ► NCe:...� 1 TSI _ �____....__ ._.Y�.�.:��,�.:x•. -:�•.�;�.- `.��.,,�.�w�r� v 633 I t# i D l03�107 A IL r • l � I I !f \� 4 __... ...._._._.___.__ _ ._: .��':.:V._:.�.~�" ._�.,,.•._..-..__�•"`:,"�....- --fit•_�` + _ .._ ._ �. , .. ;._._.._...,... .... .. ;.._ , �I I } 15 9 9'W 1 161 H (lQEI',ll1E: �. , t � � ' ��11t 11111�'I 1111111 1111 Fr1111111�111111�1f11111 I.If�lll ��1��11 1 1111 II1�1�1 I) �t�t t{ (Il lllll�t ;� I 1 �'� ► 111 t I 111 r t !Il l 1111111 ! 111 t i IIf t r�rll t f rlt rl� rlrrl __ _ -- -�_------_. ..... ,,f t.� _• ,' .:.,:, I r . .- P 'I � I ( I I I I I I I ( III � � I I ) I I � I II ( I III 1 � 1 III I t �,.•_ � i � i � ''� - NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED = ( 2 3 4 � 5 6 7 8 ® Its I I 12 DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOT ICz 1.IT IS DILE TO T�R QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL OWING. - --- - - -------- _ OE 6Z 62 a 9Z SZ vz EZ ZZ I 0z 61 BI LI 91 til 11P EI ZI II 01 6 0 L 9 S f E24 )( dt1�1111111111111101111u11uH�1t11111I�JI11111�IN1t11� 11�N11�1N1�1f�fNtlHlfltt!11N1'�111� 11111uu1u1�nnluulllnlull� nitluhllllulllultltluljlu�Y�lIIUIr>Jllu�lllllUUlllllli . � u>I�pbltt APRIL , 2 0 992 - ,� _..,.. --- -9----•--^-•....�..�..�..�._ -�1.0�......- --- - —•_.n.w,w•.......r �p,,,._..r...._._ .. _7i._ _ _.- _.,,....._,,. '".;"moi! ...u�,�,,M� �__- :•_. t.. :., �D . I �o 0 cn RMORMARM E fD ION K • 9 Q m rt � w c m r r• I h 1 rn r .15905 SW 116TH AVENUE KING CITY w CITY OF TIGARD OREGON December 10, 1990 \ Mr. Denny Meyer Meyer Sign Company of Oregon 7340 SW Landmark Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mr. Meyer; I am writing in reference to Sign Permit SGN 90-0120 which Meyer Sign Company of Oregon applied for on behalf of Bank of America on November 26, 1990 for the property commonly referred to as 15905 SW 116th Avenue. The permit fee which was paid on behalf of Bank of America was for the amount of $35.00. The sign permit fee is actually only $25.00. Therefore, the City of Tigard is refunding the amount of $10.00 to Meyer Sign Company of Oregon. The reason for this overcharge was that the total sign area, as reported on the application form, was listed as 187 square feet. In actuality, the Cit has determined that the actual sign area .is 48 square feet for all sign faces combined. The sign plan, which was submitted as part of this sign permit application, shows the dimensions of the proposed sign face as 4 feet by 4 feet. This produces a sign face area of 16 square feet. The three sided cabinet brings the total sign area to 48 square feet. Thus, the corresponding sign permit fee is $25.00. If you have any questions or comments please cor.cact the City of Tigard Planning Department at 639-4171. Sin rely, Ron Pomcaoy Development Assistance Planner 13125'W Hull Blvd.,P.O.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 -- — — — MqKMkF Permit No.J ^J t CI'T'Y OF 'ITGARD SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION Vie applicant hereby applies for a permit for the work indicated or as -hown in the ac=nparrying plans and specifications. SIGN LOCAZZON ADDRESS: �Iye zomim: 11) NAME OF BUSINESS: A N K p F A0,A t/'10/a APPLICANT/AGENT: f't 1/1 � Q ;._ OCl' my: Z. C' ', 0 PHONE: L7 O' The City of tigard imposes an annual. Business Tax whidi mLst be kept current on all per xins doing bus-mess in the City. Do you presently have a current business tax? YES ( ) NO ( ) U.L. Label r4WCSM SIGN: (Check as many as apply) r+ PERdQWENT V.-) FREESTANDING FRE KAY ( ) T&VORARY ( ) WALL ( ) L'LF7CII Jc OTHER (>C) BILLBOARD ( ) BAIZOON ( ) FA" CNNNGE _ SIGN DIMENSIONS: 5,J 3A) 11 L11 �� 1 S-5 EXPIRATION I)NiE: WTAL SIGN AREA (Sq. Ft.) : + '16. r7a , / J WU IL FACE:AREA (Sq. Ft.) : /L ,,� "I%rj Yxy - 16 K,3 -� IEaGIfr (Ft) 17f2G.=- ION FROM WAIL: IE IXONATION: YES ( x) NO ( ) TYPE: I►�i s i� DOPY: L� r' L-)n N y_ DFM A _Ay_iz I,C A MAMUALS: e CSe.k cN.atil i.j F _ EXISTING SIGNS: 11•%,cA L� tu, \ Fy T"— AUUNISTRATTVE EXCQ''ITION: N/A ( APPROV[D ( ) Ilow Mm ^% rYW�,fL�,}T ARTA ( ) 11EIG1fT ( ) PLANNING DEPA lME T All sign permits must be aeccar.annied by a scale Permit Feel: s " - drawing and plot plan. 1f work authorized under Receipt Nu: C a sign permit has not been coq)leted within ninety Ampq d� days after the issuance of the permit, the permit Date: shall become null. aryl void. i'LEJt..'I'RICAL P044rT I COMFY TI IAT I AM 'DIE W)LOW11) OW41-11 OF WE RDW:RM: YES ( ) NO ( ) 1'12OP R ANGWF AI_il".IOI21'Lll) BY '1111. C"41-V. 13t1ImING PnlMrr I IUJD*D: YES ( ) NO ( ) Ap ant's Signature - - — � cp/[IICMPi m Address n i o v_t) o(2 (TZ vZ Telephone N:\WJI?I)\(X)M1)LV\ SIGN PERMIT PERMIT #: SGN90-0120 DATE ISSUED. . . . : 12/10/90 EXPIRATION DATE: / / PARCEL. . . . . .. .. : 2S115A0-03101 ZONE. . . . .. . . .. . . ? BUSINESS NAME— : BANK OF AMERICA SIGN LOCATION. . : 15905 SW 116TH AVENUE APPLICANT/AGENT: MEYER SIGN OF OREGON BUSINESS TAX NO: -a a a a scs a a a s c¢cs aca as a=s a a_a n.c=a asa xrx=m==sa as a::=ccm a c===avaaaaaa¢¢a:=aaeaaa:�a SIGN: PERMANLNT (X) FREESTANDING (X) FREEWAY ( ) TEMPORARY { ) WALL ( ) '—�ECTRONIC ( ) OTHER ( ) BILLBOARD ( } BALLOON ( ) SIGN DI',ENSIONS. . . . . . : 4 X 4 X 3 TOTAL SIGN AREA. . . . . . 1 48 sq.ft. WALL AREA. . . . . . . . . . . . . sq.ft. WALL FACE (DIRECTION) : NA SIGN HEIGHT. . . . . . . . . . : 18 ft. PROJECTION FROM WALL. : in. ILLUMINATION. . . . . . . . . : INT DESCRIPTION OF SIGN: Face change only for existing sign. Permanent freestanding sign. 4 X 4 X 3 = 48 square AFcT (3 panel sig::) . 18 feet high. MATERIALS. . . . . . . . . . . . : STEEL/FLEX EXISTING SIGNS. . . . . . . : 1 ELECTRICAL PERMIT REQUIRED: YES BUILDING PERMIT REQUIRED. . : NO ADMINISTRATIVE EXCEPTIONS. : N/A PERMIT FXNe $ 25.00 APPROVED BYe DATE: 12/10/90 I " HANc,8A2 - Z r M OIKgN•w ow vre'Ie ee w.VIe.ID■• w•VINO ee w•vle•O ev o.cw Owwe c.rw.w.l.w DATE ...- Il � ►r.a• rni. 1-0wr•t• U�• �J�K •o..l.•a t:• ti •ne..n ao... OD ,'�✓' ti 11 APPROVED CITY Or IGARD ny_� '. Titir D,�tc /�2r0/� ,A;WLLe � I It.utM,FAf� i ='i�it,rr�,i~h bt'fL•C�s.,k�1+iN>K� y 'FLANK r-�'c� I f PCS (Z) g�pE;ti t F3)it > Ir�R y W/wo i Fl ht fivCIl ltamIN'`it'.f-f,t µN E VINJyu Cvo-(V l t' lv, Wrr L'�+t c�uT L,114;.? ,YMmo, #RLI 15t. 4uri. e W1I(TrI vt br..�uKf t°aic L;IK4. H^iNT PY ON Pow; coO- `Vy,.; Mm. NOTe, � �..--+�tL"PPVK f !Pi}'t-�,� •i�?l.t� t'�V(';K f4 riI�1�1�c tG trr r,SAI tLP.�,. i ArrROVED MY OF ARD Title Aj&.qjLAjLPv]LAjLxM% 190—20708R i i or, n,rwAnro PU C OF PAYMENT RE I P T 0. CHECK AMOUNT -55. CASH AMIAMT 00 NAME MUYFR SIGN C-0. OF 11PEGION ADDRES5 73-40 SW LANDMARK LAf4E PAYMENT DATE I j 2-6/90 SUDD I V I r2i I ON TIBARD. OR 9' PI PPOSE OF' PAYMENr AMOUNT PAID F,LJRr`O9E Or- PAYMENT AMOUNT FA I Ul t-At-ir, ME APPL 0(l E+x Care PEPLV,!,l C-30N 90-0120 y INSPECTION NOTICE City of Tigard Building Department ,),) P.O. Box I, on 97 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone: 639-4175 f � Type of Inspection n " Date RequestedTime _ A.M._�.P.M. Address Permit # Owner °1 �! sit_ Lot # Builder The following Bull ing Code deficiencies are required to be corrected: Presented to -G�� Approved �' , Inspector _ Disapproved Date CALL FOR RYINSPFCTION ❑ YE$ F-1 NO WJTIGrA BUILDING PERMIT CITY OF RD fC11YOF PERMIT NO. : BU892F�7FJANDCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TE ISSUED: 12/15/89 13125 S.W.Hall Blvd P.O Box 23397,Tigard.Oregca 97223.(5('3)639-4175 1 M.frM T.Nn. 892670 30B ADDRESS: 15905 SW 116TH AVE TAX MAP/L01 SUR: KING CITY IT: TO".. I..AND USE: LOT SIZE: VALUATION: $ `.,,300 SETBACKS FRONT: REAR: WORK CLASS: ALTERATION DWELL.UNITS: LEFT: RIGHT: USE TYPE: COMMERCIAL NO.BEDROOMS: EXT.WALL. CONST: CONST.TYPE: VN Nn.BATHS: N: S: E: W: OCCUP.GRP. : B2 PROT.OPE..NINGI:: OCCUP.LOAD N: S: E: W. TOTAL. AREA: NO.STORIES: 1 1ST: ROOF CONST: FTRF RET- HEIGHT: 2ND: AREA SEPAR"' RASED: BASEMENT? 3RD: OCCUP.SEPAR? RATED: MEZZANINE? BA;EM'T FLOOR LOAD: 50 (:GARAGE:: FIRE SPRY.LR? ALARM? FLOW(GPM) DETECT? HEAT TYPE: HDCP.ACCESS? CORR? PLAN CHECK BY: Jhf REMARKS: Relocate Automatic teller Machine. REISSUE OF NO. LAST REISSUE FEES: (-' Beni. Franklin 5 R (- PERMIT W $56.59 N PLAN REVIEW $36.7. FIRE DEPT $22.60 STATE TAX $2.83 OTHER ---�-- DEVELOPMENT CHARGES: '' SDC(STORM) N P.J. CUMMINGS CO. SDC(STREET) I fa 2330 SE CLATSOP ST. PDC(# ) Portland OR 97202 PREPAID ( $118.65) PHONE (503) 235-1282 REGISTRATION NO. 23230 TOTAL: This permit rs Issued subject to the regulations contained in title to —_.__._._____.._..____.______RECEIPT NO. of the TMC. State of Oregon Srecialty Codes,toning regulations REOUIRED INSPECTIONS and all other applicable codes and ordinances. and it Is hereby FRAMING aareed that the work will be done In accordance with the plans and Specifications and In compliance with all applicable codes and INSULATION ordinances The issuance of this permit does not walve+restrictive GYP. BOARD covenants. Contractor and subcontractors shall have current city FINAL business tax permits This permit will expire and become null and void if work is not started within 180 days,or if work is suspended or abandoned fat a period of 180 days any time after work has commenced. It shall be the responsibility of the permittee to assure Fill rewired Inspections are requested and approved. r Ina4By -- a --- Iss C'iLI F(1R IN1ECTTON 639-4175 SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR WORK OTHER THAN DESCRIBED ABOVE CITYOFT167ARD04�L\ 10 PLANS CHECK APPLICATION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLAN CHECK N /,.� �' .7 - C- 1312S S.W.HBO Blvd..P.O.Box 23397,T4prd,Oregon 97223,(5W)639.4175 PERMIT # DATE ISSUED JOB ADDRESS: ( � U?• ((� fC — TAX MAP/LOT IUB: L01 : LAND USC: VALUATION: _ OWNER SPECIAL NOTES NAME: F><' 2`l I(�( �_) C� REISSUE OF: -_ ADDRESS: LAST REISSUE: FLOOD PLAIN/ _ SENSITIVE LAND: PHONE: c - -- APPROVALS REQUIRED CONTRACTOR PLANNING: NAME: `) � P _ ENGINEERING: ADDRESS: �'' �` _�F. FIRE DEPT �^ •�f� OTHER: PHONE:: C �-j- j C1 ITEMS REQUIRED BUILDERS BOARD N: ' r'; EXP DATE: LIST/SUBCONTRACTORS: _ BUS TAX: ARCH/ENGIAEER CALCULA(IONS: NAME: _ - Ae. TRUSS DETAILS: ADDRESS: _ OTHER: PHONE . _- - COrMUN TS: e E f C r,��s--l.�.f��r A n6 SUBCONTRACTORS: PLUMB: � lC(�"" MECH: PERMIT N ACCT N DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT PD. BAL. DUE 10-432 00 Building Permit Fees -- 10--431 00 Plumbing Permit Fees _ 10---431 01 Mechanical Permit Fees 10-230 01 State Building Tax (5X) Building Plumbing Mech _ 10-433 00 Plans Check Fee Building _ Plumbing - Mech 30-202 00 Sewer Connection 30--444 00 Sewer Inspection 51-448 00 Street System Dev Charge (SDC) _ 52-449 00 Parks System Dev Charge (PDC) 31-450 00 Storm Drainage Syst Dev Chrg (SSDC) _ 10-230 06 Fire ' TOTAL_ RLC b P LICANT S1GNA IRE .. Received By: }�L Date Received: /„J /S d cm/3587P/18P y Automatic Teller Machine Changeover : For lilt IV el R or a) dfln Fra FEDERAL_SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSN. Project KING CITY BRANCH (N.C.R. RELOCATION) 15905 S.W. 116th Avenue Tigard, Ore(Ion July 26, 1989 CITY OF TIC-APE)7 Approved..... .................................................... .,��Q Conditlonally Apr rr ' .......... .I For only the wort, PERMIT t4(). 70 See tetter to:r„ Att,rc'. . ..... ..... .. . ... ... . ..... . Job Ad, ARCHITECTURE ay� bclsBRUCE A. SAMUELSON A.I.A. 35 N.E. 17th Avenue s Poitland, Oregon 97232 0 (503) 239-7526 GENERAL NOTES: The Contractor shall analyze each project for conformance to information and details noted on Drawings and report any uncovered discrepancies or problems tc the Architect or Owner for a determination or decision. The enclosed Drawings and prints are generally diagr•airknatic and illustrate the desired position for the new location for the new replacement Automatic Teller Machine at the designated branch. At some locations, the installation of a new Surround may also be required. Consult Drawings. Conduct all work in accordance with National , State and Local rules, regulations and ordinances as may be requT-2d. The Contractor shall remove the present A.T.M. unit where necessary and existing wall construction as necessary or required with care and shall prepare the appropriate new opening in existing walls and/or provide such new or remodeled enclo..ure or filler walls as indicated by the Drawings. Consult specific branch drawings for location and type of installation and consult standard drawings for required wall openings. Modifications or additions to the standard drawings when required are noted on the pertinent branch drawings for each project. Provide appropriate rough-opening for the new OMRON A.T.M. installation through the present or new wall as indicated. At Branches with crawl space or basement under the A.T.M. Unit, install additional bracing or support to floor framing as noted or required by the typical support drawings. Provide all materials, tools, equipment, labor, fittings :,rd subcontractors as required by each installation and where requirzd, arrange for and provide all necessary permits and inspections as may be required by State or Local ordinance. Arrange for and provide all necessary electrical , communication and mechanical services, or modifications to existing services where appropriate, as required by Manufacturer of new A.T.M. Unit to be installed or by existing conditions. The final hookups and testing will be by others. Coordinate and schedule all construction operations and sequence each day's activities in such a manner so that the facility may be ;made safe and secure at the close of regular business hours. Provide necessary safety barricades or protections as required so as to protect persons or property from injury or damage throughout the construction period. Coordinate work szhrdules and material storage so as to provide the least possible interference to business operations and customer access to the Branch. DEMOLITION: Materials in good condition and possible for reuse shall be carefully removed and stored for later installation. Where filler surface materials, as may be required, can be salvaged, care shall be taken in the removal of such materials for reuse. When requested, materials in good condition and not scheduled for reuse shall be turned over to the Owner as directed. All materials not required for reuse or requested to be turned over to the Owner shall be removed from the site. Carefully remove the present N.C.R. A.'f.M. unit and return it to Portland and deliver it to a location as designated by the Benj. "Franklin. INSTALLATION: At locations exposed 'to weather, finish and caulk all work as required to provide a weather proof installition and protect interior finishes during and after construction work. FINISHING: Whenever possible, reuse salvaged material or any available surplus materials at the branch for installation where finish is rioted to mat h existing. When existing material is not available, locate and provide material which matches as closely as possible adjacent existing materials. The use of full length materials is preferred over piecing of short lengths, and wherever possible, termina*,c new material or finish at natural breaks such as corners, jambs or different materials. Where new work is to be included, it is the intent that the appearance and details of the new work shall match that which exists uniess noted otherwise. Where the A.T.M. Unit is scheduled to be installed at an area presently covered by carpet, remove the carpet and pad from the floor for a distance not to exceed three (3) inches beyond the outer edge of the stand and install floos•ing materials as selected prior to installing the new unit. MATERIALS: CONCRETE: Type I normal 2,500 psi minimum 4 inch slump. STEEL: A-36. PIPE: Schedule 40 galvanized, standard weight. STAINLESS STEEL: Type 302, 16 ga. satin finish with finished welded corners and joints. STUDS: Wood or metal as note,' or required. WALLBOARD: Match existing or Type-X fire rated as noted or required. ALL OTHER MATERIALS: As noted or required to match existing. A �x• SU�F�Du N� I� 2Ya �, z/,g,z Of o ox XX Al 27zti / 1-�/$ 1-I/L 1- I/L •4. •/ *'fit N- AI►--� v-Z; + u1 / I'-_7% ` 1 � 14 _ / Pr1 j Q � \ 4n,/n.Ko t-J -- - - - - - -- - /- �1'' `�. 2- E,t 1�7 c-.,' tax��1-i`t �4•c 20 a..�A 1,<;. )-o pr /,• 7, USC �xIST�j, ul i Icy�J G 1 Ire. Mtv-3. Rk.NKL114 t EatRAI_ ��► IJG��I-cArl S AACHITECTIURE ___BRUCE A. SAMUELSON A.I.A. 6ATl-Jui.-( 198.8 2a U.N. 171%.AVENUE -�— 1)RAWIN(i PORTLAND. OREGON 61232 16 031 226-1626 COYY.67 7/ I W." 15 CNR. B,4S 0f L-�11N�7 4� INt��vir.�uAL PS 2.a.H c ri Q c 'Q * N aT�- N z � Z - , Q a \r p +I Id N / � M l< e N . �' r XTt �IC, F-1 o � It a � 2 NaT� T�2 \\/ALl_ 6 ENIr, /AV_ 10N) F3�N�, }`RANK.LiN F�N'=�L�R/�.L !�.,e�V�tv6�dlOANat1 RRCHITECTU ii " BRUCE A. SAMUELSON A.I.A. DATE'JuL-( i9fj8 35N.E. +r'M. AVENUE DRAWING 11.0 6031 NO, o"EonN 97EE2 16 031 :59- 762 COMM. 837.7/ I Own. !sS CNE. E �. ANSTALLATION NOTES; 1. Provide new timber or laminated 2x headers at top of new openings ir; wood frame bearing walls. Provide new, or reinstall existing where poFsible, steel angle iron Ledgers at top of new opening in Masonry walls. 2. Verify difference in grade between finish floor and surface of exterior walk and determine if removable approximate 8 inch base/controller is to be re- tained or removed for installation of unit at the OPTIMUM height of 3'-0-1/4" from the walk surface to bottom of new wall opening. At wood frame floor systems provide and install a new steel plate or sk'eel angles between the four (4) adjustable leveling feet and floor sheathing to distribute punching shear stresses along the sheathing. 3. As equipment adjustable leveling feet have a 3/4" plus to 3/4" minus ( 1-1/2" total) adjustment and the removable base accommodates an 8" !1d3ustment in mounting height, determine height of and install an appropriate new BASE between unit and existing floor to obtain the desired mounting height. Refer to Notes 4 b 5 also. 4. Determine by field measurements if a dimension of 1 '-5-1/2." will be available below the bottom of the new wall opening and any present framing noted to be retained that would limit installation of the new SURROUND where such is to be included. Notify Architect or Owners Representative if l ' -5-1/2" is not available for a determination if the Optimum height is to be raised or if the present limiting projection is to be removed as necessary. 5. Determination by field measurements if a dimensiin of 1 ' -10" will be avail- able above the top of the new wall opening and any present framing noted to be retained that would limit installation of the new SURROUND where such is to be included. Notify Architect or Owners Representative if 1 '-10" is not available for a determination if the Ontimur. height is to be lowered or if the present limiting projection is to be removed as necessary. 6. Determine by field measurements if a dimension of 2'-2-1/2" will be available at each side of the new wall opening centerline and any present framing netad to be retained that would limit installation of the new SURROUND reported to be 4'-4" wide where such is to be included. Notify Architect or Owners Representative if there would be insufficient width for installation of the Surround for a determination if the wall surface width is to be rebuilt to a widtl required or if the surround might not be installed at that site. r'U"I-FW..Ae f SAi Nisi-s# LcjiaN .o.Qae�r1. ARCHITECTURE' BRUCE A. SA_MUE_LSON A.I.A. OATE•,JUL.'(, 91F ]! N.E. 11IA. AVENUE` — ORA ING PORTLAND. 011EGON 9/232 160_21 229--1620 COMM. A73 ow _ ExIST�L�. 1 E RA1 U 1Ca ` YJ R-mOVE --. ----- --- EXI� Ca• tiL C [aMF'. RDGF1Nu`� MUL�TtvN Ex. QAIUNG, - - VP wp. PANE - I S� � u .1 uq pCIsT4. \,A4IN OW EX. V,I C,K—) —HEAvel?, X E . r- T M ET.4 L- KE TAJ ghSHE DC11wch TRIM vu� -FILL It EN nr C. 611 /til_ I 91p. bp. EJ PCONC-s NSA r- 2- 4 , BIL "'Cl. p#�N E-t L. IS I z I L L Elf i 44 P, 1512. V�F F'LA",- "E rAL- Mv,I S T'6 I N,64 IE,H FX' 5TOO w z �; !%(4j4� SURROUND-� ETA, –0 IN 67 EL I5 CIM LL :) vi�� te Mt-INTI N C- GDLk - 0 U. 0 SILL Fx- UL,9-- A L L 4 I , tj F,po u N UN,>g>- iii000l I L L R.E fro L Ac-f- C-"ks k A. T. K/1- OFEWIKIC.1 T. R-EL 0 AT 10 KJ k-IW-6-6j-Y-13TARCH ERTLABR A- muN FIRCHITECTUIRE OREGON ND: BRUCE A. SAMUELSON A.I.A. MOL AVINUE DRAWING PORTLAND. OREGON 97222 (a 031ISO-?$to CONN. 9-?.�l IDWN.Kp -]C"1I.&415 2- NEW yz' I M D. O. . PA N G I... j 1 REMOVE EXIST O. I ' I SEMI- RE GE5SED 1 SIGN � I 1 REMOVE AND REINSTALL AXI ST G. r_ D.D. PANEL 1 --- I FEMrvE I - I I I EX,IST'C- 9 I y E XI`�T G. A. T. MM 1 , V �z Y K i/Z-- M`0.0 . UNlT I W I N[w 6�3 I OC Kf ui r�i R L I C4 I 1t < I _ ---- —... h �J d RE 1 ST AL L6^-�� W � Yl i RETAIN ii=X I ST,U• W 111 'I dAN EL -� �I Y.15T 1 U. A. T. M. UNIT WALL_ PA NELINU R E '\l I S I TKA. R EL OC AT I O N B11.1 X_'_ . _ I KIN6 GIT` E�KANC_ H iT. F RA N 1w N FE D F F,w 5AV I N G S LO AN ^-�C F"MU A SAMU N , FIRCHITECTUMS i�3 BRUCE A. SAMUEISON A.I.A. .ATI'JUI-y ��,Ik, 1 •_ �PDRRAND,OREGON _ -_ — t�, O� �a M! 171k. AVENUE DRAWING �t /� �`� EOEtIAND. OREGON sisal "F k) .- �..��es•-ill. 3 I - cOWIN. g7.:1 ors. KP cNa.eu 7 `� -�""ea?R�^�✓�1�`i ��'��'�'�. ter✓'\/�../"�' .�"4` �f ;• r t`�' �'R•/� 111 > t zu 00 00 i• r 1 �a �r +•+ , f �-4i in tj a, 4J as r 1 U r4 ° k Y 04 Q 'tr , '�' S b OU V -+ +�'� �' (�,h4i'l,�' Ln f„� N tin a U Ln 0 N a •r I u V O u rr04t �1 1 �ss+i C' V Ci iy w .~r x: frQ i }fits �, 4-1 tax- �/s'ar�' ahtl✓!i r.'.. _-._x _ __._,... ,- --- - ..— - "'�1r9 .". E f„ Y� yt" Y} y.4 "' r ,\ • I .a R Y ��q3.�. A �� 5 �G ��j`3°"'ri!�• "t tJ *. .,.� 1J �• _.l .! l.. i f �v,. A �y�n tl�,•'°�f�} + M', fi t� h , ►�� :. t 4 n �1� illll��; kM9Y' . >��'g1�11' r +e "�y '•6�'t { .•Yat"fit y Tualatin Fire District Inspection Hotice 8405 S.W Elligsen Ro,nd T!l,-Jnti.n, Oregon 97002 Phono 682-2601 r _ �L i)1'fHrnq Name F1�.1 1^�i uJ .a led.�/'A duress Pursuant to Sectionjs) of adopted Cones, the following item(s) require correcting: L JI r- �-- ( x q v� C�� Y ►c� 2_.LLle "� ... �7�.1� C— i S L✓[-<. �z V 0 G , !Z Ai �:_ - ,ate G �'- z/ ejAz— C, ti. Date: _...�._.�- I n, rector J _ CALL L FOR REINSPECTION DR BUILDING DEPT. aoo-31 ARCHITECTURE: \-bas) BRUCE A. SAMUELSON A.I.A. 35 N.E. 17th Avenue • Portland, Oregon 97232 • (503) 239-7526 June 8, 1981 Project: Benj. Franklin Federal Savings arid Loan Association KING CITY BRANCH Mr. Ed Walden, Building Official City of Tigard 12420 S.W. Main Street Tigard, Uregon 97223 Dear Mr. Walden: We are enclosing one of the Armstrong Ceiling System Underwriters Laboratory stickers for the ceiling tile f,hat will be used at the subject project. This is being sent as back-up information per our letter of May 27, 1981 regarding the foil faced insulation material. The material is riot at the jobsit.e as of this dat--, but we received this sticker from the same material which is being used at the Sunnyside Branch and has just been installed. 'Armstrong CEILING SYSTEMS ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSIHIES, ING LANCASTER, PA. 17604 Rc R4171-BF 11N1)ERVVRITFRS' I ABORATORIES, INC.M CLASSIFIED ACOUSTICAL MATERIAL COnf—IR Nol Ow So Sq I 1 (FORM 9) I%Rue No C 1670 SURFACE BURNING �.1.nCeC.iy, FIRE RESISTANCE CHARACTERISTICS CLASSIFICATION FLAME SPREAD ... 25 DESIGN NUMBER FUEL CONTRIBUTED . . 20 -r SMOKE DEVELOPED 10 G210 Bruce A. Samuelson SEE U L FIRE RESISTANCE DIRECTORY °' Printed In United Steles of America P ARCHITECTURE 1-b a Ipj_ BRUCE A. SAMUELSON A.I.A. 35 N.E. 17th Avenue • Portland, Oregon 97232 • (503) 239-7526 May 27, 1981 Project: Benj. Franklin Federal Savings and Loan Association KING CITY BRANCH Barnard & Kinnev 10125 S.W. Beaverton Highway Beaverton, Oregon 97005 Dear Mr. Kinney: On the way to the project this date, we stopped at the Tigard City Hall and discus- sed the problem with supply of the rated foil faced insulation for the subject proj- ect with Mr. Ed Walden (Building Officiel). It was decided that because of the present supply problem for the rated Class I foil faced insulation and since the ceiling tile to be installed V-4" below the insulation is Class I rated material, the use of the specified foil faced insulation will be allowed for this projec�. We hope that this resolves the supply problem and that the instp.11ation of the insulat- ion can proceed as scheduled. Sincerlyp Bruce A. Samuelson cc. Mr. Ed Walden cc. Mr. Del Har.pster GRADE 15 ADE GR 11 J o AL PROPERTIES - FOIL-TO-KRAFT PYRO-KURE* COMBINATION Construction Grade 615 Outer Plies `--� 1. tan kraft Y-) 2• 1/3 mil. s alum. foil fibre reinforcing t/2" }'aro s1►acing r,►ch direction LES t i n►ininuun) Uj fiall Laminating adhesive Pyro-Kure Cj u Approx. shipping weight per hundred sq. ft. 6.3 lbs. Physical Prol►erties Tensile lbs./1" (w*) Machine direction 42 Cross machine direction 20 Beach puncture units 28 MD Edge tear lbs./1" (Finch) 12 CMD Edge tear lbs./1" (Finch) 12 Water resistance (Hours) 200+- Water vapor Permeability (perms) 0.03 A%erag, .thimimmn reflectivity 9(1.9.;9'0 Maximum fla►ue spread (Underwriters' Laboratories) Foil side 5 Kraft side 25 NOTE: Pyro-Kure 015, slandard sizes 38",40", 50". and 52". Rolls 200 lineal yards. Other roll widths oc lengths available -- consult mill. The values listed for physical properties are average values riot guaranteed �y minimums. Vit• SISALKRAFT DIVISION �� ARCHITECTURE �bas) BRUCE A. SAMUELSON A.I.A. 35 N.E. 17th Avenue + Portland, Oregon 97232 s (503) 239-7526 TRANSMITTAL NOTICE To: �arnnrd t,� Kinney Date: ;lay 13, 191`11 it L25 S,W. deavorton Highway 'sPaverton, Uregon W005 Project: ! en,j. Franklin Federal Savinge and Loran /association KING CITY BRANCH Transmitted herewith: Item Copies Dated Title. Shu,i orawinra 0-63604 for the roof Lrurjat; fur the ".lack Towor support at the subject project. APPROVED WITH CURRECTIJil:a HUTED 5-13-+11 Remorks: It .in our understandi i that the mnnufacturern enclineer is reviainj this drewin7 to itufinMe the Hpecifir_• �rolU-duwn clips fur the truss ands and that a revised Bet of drawings in being forwarded. Enc,As listed CC: X. o1 II,Jrpnter w/ .l anal. BRUCE A. SAMIUELSON Ci Ly of Tigard Building 0ppt. w/ 1 encl. ARCHITECTURE l ba-p BRUCE A. SAMUELSON A.I.A. 35 N.E. 17th Avenue • Portland, Oregon 97232 • (503) 239-7526 TRANSMITTAL NOTICE To: Mr. Ed Walden, Building Official. Date: April 23, 1981 City of Tigard 12420 S.W. Main Street Project: Benj. Franklin Federal Savings Tigard, Oregon 97223 and Loan Association KING CITY BRANCH Transmitted herewith: Item I Copies Dated Title 1 3 Apr. 23, 1981 Letter requesting approval of the EXCEPTION listed under U.B.C. section 330c for the subject project. 2 1 ea. AprAPPROVED81 Roof truss shop drawings as requested by Mr. Dort Howick for she subject project. Remarks: Would you please return two copies o` the enclosed letter to our office with art approval notation where noted fur out and the owners files shuuld you ayree with the granting of the exception as allowed under section 3303c as to the lack of any due cause that we are aware of and with a copy of this letter we can obtain the approval of the Banking Conimissi(-;i for the security of the facility. Copies cf the roof truss shop crawings are being sent this date to the contractor. Enc: As listed BRUCg A. SAMUELSON CC: Bruce A. Samuelson ARCHITECTURE b a BRUCE A. SAMUELSON A.I.A. 35 N.E. 17th Avenue • Portland, Oregon 97232 • (503) 239-7526 April 23, 1981 Project: Benj. Franklin Federal Savings and Loan Association KING CITY BRANCH Mr. Ed Walden, Building Official City of Tigard 12420 S.W. Main Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Mr. Walden: This letter is in response to a question from the material supplier for the entrance; doors at the subject project regarding the possible conflict with the _locking hardware for the pairs of doors at the building. As you are already aware, the security requir- ments of the Banking Industry are in conflict with an actual interpretation of the lock- ing requirements in the Uniform Building Code. The requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Re3erve Board require a positive facility locking arrangement and the requirements of U.B.C. section 3303c allows only the use of automatic flush bolts which are not accepted by the aforementioned organizations as a positive facility locking arrangement. Chapter 3303c EXCEPTIONS allows the above noted locking arrangement for B occupancies but notes that this exception may be revolked by the building official for due cause. We hereby request that an Exception be granted for the pairs of doors being used as exits for this project. We propose the use of the following locking arrangement which in the past at other branches has been allowed as a compromise to both of the conflict- ing locking requirements as noted above in this letter. LUCKING HARDWARE: Style U push/pull ;dates at the outside and inside. Lockset: Adams Rite MS+1890 with MS 45'9x4560 handle and top and bottom flush bolts in the inactive leaf. Cylinders as specified in section BN of the specifications. This system allows the control of entrance to the building at closing time but main- tains free egress from the buildiiiy with the use of the No. 4560 handle on the active leaf of the pair of doors. We wish to point out that the exit requirements for this building is served by a sing- le leaf door at the locations where pairs of doors are shown on the drawings and that each leaf of the pair of doors is 3'-0" wide by 7'-0" high which meets the requirements of section 3303d. In accordance with the allowable exception listed in section 3303c, the actove leaf will be signed to read: "THIS DOOR TO REMAIN UNLOCKED DURING BUSINESS HOURS". We thank you for your consideration of this request as the question he, been asked. Sincerly, Bruce A. �amuelson, A.I.A. Approved by: Date: t , It Q u. 0, V r N O v l � Y� u j El Qi r C .G r`p.•— 11 • +� :7 = o cccM F r, m _ LO Cc cx nnr-. � Q. w X ✓ '� � • \ rt C • e ".; S, � '[C N��oaowww ■ NNnh.HAlpb p e o a o a o o n v o•� .� ¢ I � ��1 nF� �wsie�p000uoo F / �k� e000eoeoonna � n eoa w-rr-'-oe_r��e •/,i ,.�� niaerin+I VI Ie Iorn r I f Fi., r � NNY r1 n11 ww YIN = \ r' o Nn,nerewe�N� Y �I I �r V RS SR aRR [£ ii! •nnnw^wnwwnn N�•1 ^ws ` (� r,r ryy,yr 11N{{hr�n11N/ ua �^ 1,.,I'1 J I ' •t vi wo O(l d 0 a O O a J V a U nnn n �A `� •� �I�7 L� M ' 'j � � N n n.�N n h n N N N w 1 �. � �.[ � n•n � �t NNN i Y• +N n,new�/e..N ��Y �O` � � r v "t. V��- Ir Il •) J. uj -----_ ___ _- -- - - Rag C,) 4 F-I 4 9 Wis. � dc CMtr it Cl gi to h��eeewwb Cr t R Mf NNn•,Irnrse of uj 1-r) Yr7 it i .moi Me` �'�=• N �J r� F J. j. r � -, �� •C r I �� V J U 12 p n r twit S L \ ��r�NO�y��r ♦ ♦ yrs �f� � 1 1 n uz �r � lAM�1A�1Mw Mnnrn nn r.n� LL- 111iii HIM" N► u� .1 ii i;d��edon000 a ' = iiiLLL Jcu i •�a0aoeo700000 Ii 1A:.,:.:.;::7:0_.;a Etij 4WQ NNOlf T N.�1 p� �S F e Nl��nwr•ww��n. � ., �� -i..�:nom.-ewey�n: c .`• .� ,. ♦ r a � a v as • �� i, o �� '� :I ��tt d « Aoi •e � w-- � G r � ;t; ` !� iY� w..n•�nrw w• e• � tlt !fir � , �4.4 044.4nN 1OM1"V N NN y♦•N �n n1 O •� le s aaaaes�Qasee�� ` �ga .. n={k �Y�i � .e " •� •tl .R �l 1 R�.1 /yp1 f(pJ r 1 VF � i 4. JY- sass � �— _-1—_ir.�. .rr�_._�_.. Q VI { t e ccrc u M I1 1 k�jUl ,l ❑ �r� ..t. Y� IJ � CZ � 5 aco M. y R Ln F r Y. NN h�wFeervn fill / ui � / n r r. ++�� @gQY ggyytC$gQQ QQ g C8 �R 1fd�sRlSbRlSo°v`d°Oo fir" . ��.�I a1r�n enooar+ Q �[u e � � dl�NxkSgF 14 AAIA 5won3 R its: a=«F T CRS' CL < .. � �` w�w.e w w„n• e e pp n r � J �. '�rM�{rJ ra�iMM■«��rMrN nd 8hi�• �.. ! O• �•��OOLF10U4U etl pY�ni ��Nu. i \'. T�rl��n�11N♦M1w•N NN .. e a�a��a»aa�sssa °° weI�gn � .Nwe�t�e„e..Ian• � K?�° -, 'e c % � R .0 \ � � \ : | � I 13 S % k ¥ \ \ 1 k cL) b , E R � 2S § kb ƒ ® § 7 § :% w 7- UJ @ k22kE� k / fes Ok tz k %24r- j m3' uj �■ LLi \ & �k cn 5 / L., Gfk' 2o -A � $ ■ / // \ ® LLA CA b2 ƒ2 ® ® » 2G d � 222� � � � q 2LLA k § 2a ■ a 2 Cie 2 r F3LIHGSTAHLER / HCDOLME3 ASSOCIATES CGY•11 v Sonn ..1 M. tiol n..-w Structural Engini�iars 'I'�nFi. 4,504 S.W. C"rbett - Aorticind. 97201 1' 1. (503) 2,26-6501 April 22, 1981 A Y8 HHUCE A.I.A. A�CHI-rr•�: Mr. Bruce Samuelson, Architect 35 N. E. 17th Portland, Oregon 97232 RE: Benjamin Franklin - King City, Roof Trusses. Dear Bruce: The shop drawings as submitted do not :how that the trusses supporting the clock tower (D63664) have been analyzed for uplift caused by wind loading. 'No things must be considered. First, the effect of the uplift un the overall tnlss; second, the localized effect of transferring the uplift from the tower legs into the truss. I>etails C/9 and F/9 show how the tower legs fasten to the top chord of the truss. The uplift force .is transferred into the top chord via the thru bolt. The force must then be transferred out of the top chord into the truss web members by cross grain tension in the top chord unless another way is provided. I recommend this be brought to the truss designer's attention to make sure all effects of the uplift force have been accounted for. Very truly yours, ---Samuel M. Holmes SMI i:nme Encl . t - BENJ. FRANKLIN 129 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION KING CITY DATE_____.. 4/ly ___._,19 THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT FOR THE WORK HEREIN INDICATED BUILDER PHONE OR AS SHOWN AND APPROVED IN THE ACCOMPANYING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. OWNER PHONE '246-1364 'i h L OWNER _f j.f runklin F ej.l B ADDRESS LOT NO.��_ -- —_�__ 1 �yU� SW llUth. King Citzy _- ARCHITECT BruceSamuelt ori BUILDER :i"�!tt8rii `� Kinnr., ,IryC.ADDRESsl0i2a SLI ElutnENGINEER�Nlci1 NWY OAIf4NkR Sim Halmee STRUCTURE U NEW ❑ REMODEL ❑ ADDITION ❑ REPAIR ❑ RENEWAL ❑ FIRE DAMAGE _ ❑ DEMOLITION ❑ RESIDENCE Ill COMM ❑ EDUCATIONAL ❑ GOV'T ❑ RELIGIOUS ❑ PATIO ❑ CARPORT ❑ GARAGE ❑ STORAGE ❑ SLAB❑ FENCE OCCUPANCY j��_LAND USE ZONE _!�"3 9LDG.TYPE _ bN FIRE ZONE—_PLAN CHECK BY c iwf) HEAT WORK - ,Ing City ;. :sanch - den-Jamin Franklin 3 & L. permit covers grading,__ _ inyj con--rete work, storm & senitpry getter, landscaping & irrigation systiero.__ _EWER PERMIT# E ppb U.S.p H L SOORO ;� PERMIT #2404S - $2.03J.00 dated 3 2b Eel OCC.LOAD FLOOR LOAD HEIGHT _ NO.STORIES AREA NO.BEDROOMS VALUd, BUILDING DEPARTMENT SET BACKS FRONT REAR LEFT SIDE RIGHT SIDE Permit _ ,. 00 THIS PERMIT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN i HE BUILDING CODE, ZONING REGULATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES, AND IT I'; HEREBY AGREED THAT THE Plan Check 89.'T.i WORK WILL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND IN COMPLIANCE Sub total 267.013 WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES. THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT WAIVE RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS. CONTRACTOR AND SUB CONTRACTORS TO HAVE CURRENT CITY BUSINESS LICENSE.SEPARATE PERMITS,REQUIRED FO F AWEA,PLUMNINO AND HEATING. state Tex /)' 7. ? SDC— Total 1;%'74• ),. PDCN By _ p 1 Rerelpt No. Approved dLrh ADORESA PFION r BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 19'' __ 1297 KING CITY DATE - THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT FOR THE WORK HEREIN INDICATED BIJILDER PHONE 646-2,125 OR AS SHOWN AND APPROVED IN THE ACCOMPANYING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. OWNER PHONE -1364 LOT NO.1 0"" l"r0CD _ OWNER;.;E3n.jjranklin &LJOBADDRt:SS1b905 561 116th Avenue, King City -�� ARCHITECT Bruce Samuelson Barnard & Kinney ENGINEER BUILDER Barn Inr;•ADDRESSltl12�; SW [�vtn,Hlsdl HwjpE9iAxBft Sam Holmes STRUCTURE_ W NEW ❑ REMODEL ❑ ADDITION_ ❑ REPAIR ❑ RENEWAL U FIRE DAMAGE �D DEMOLITION P RESIDENCE IX COMM ❑ EDUCATIONAL ❑ GOV'T ❑ RELIGIOUS ❑ PATIO ❑ CARPORT Cj CARAGE C STORAGE ❑ SLAB FENCE OCCUPANCY _-U-2 LAND USE ZONE _-.Cr�j BLDG.TYPE -�41 FIRE ZONE=- PLAN CHECK BY 4wh HEAT ULDG_ Kirov Clay Uranch - 11.�tn aurin Franklin S & L. All per plans and Code. Separate permits rec;uired for plumbing & mechanical. SEWER PERMIT# ppLL _ OCC.LOAD 20 FLOOR LOAD .10 HEIGHT E U NO.STORIES_1 AREA 2'789 NO.BEDROOMS-- VALAl 3(J,7W BUILDING DEPARTMENT SETBACKS FPONT U REAR : I LEFT SIDE .1.6 � RIGHT SIDE 4 �—Per—mit••-- 34..!A THIS PERMIT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN THE BUILDING CODE, ZONING Plan 17 1 L',� REGULATIONS ANO ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES, AND IT IS HEREBY AGREED THAT THE • WORK WILL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICASLE CODES AND ORDINANCES. THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT WAIVE Sub-total _ :13. 7�j RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS. CONTRACTOR AND SUB CONTRACTORS TO HAVE CURRENT CITY BUSINESS ^ LICENSE.SEPARATE.PERMITS REQUIRE 090 SE ER,PLU��AND HEAT4NG. State Tax llF' 13. 70 /! SDC- By Pl PDCM APPLI ANT AQEN - duh ADDRESS No. ADDRE39 y---v PHONE Approved DATE INSP, TYPE INSPECTION a4MARKS R PLUMBING DATE Contractor e y^�Y Permit Nom' y 040 X?—IL_ o�C �td�_ d��.�+-..,` Rough-In ----- -S—/fes Flxturo Final HEATING —"— /�3"'S- Contractor 11�-51 v'3 Permit No Gas or Oil Final -- — —_ SEWER Final -- ---— DRIVEWAY -- — - Final _— Storm Drainage --` -- — (Rein Drain)Final - Sidewalk --�� Curb d Street Final 1— Approach Rl.6C� 6EPT, /INAL TEMPORARYCEFtTIFICATF CERTIFICATE OCCUPANCY Final �J Landecapl a Toning Final BUILDING PriFMlT APPLICATION . DArE_ 3 1AI t9 THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FC=l A PERINAIT FOR ThE WORK HEREIN INDICATED BUILnER PHONE64.2I2 5 ORAS SHOWN AND APPROVED IfJ THE,,CCOt, PANYING PLAYS A SPECIFICATIONS. OWNER PHONE - • . 5 At L 0 M LOT NO. /07 .21I-/p C'b M JOB ADDRESS O 1. lM� AKEFXHECT. _ �,�MOb � /q Al BUI--ER a roCADDRESS/0/,Z57wNGINEER 97 STRUCTURE NEW C3 REMODEL _❑ ADDITION ] REPAIR RENEWAL ❑ FIRE DAMAGE 10DEtAO-`DEMOLITION _i RESIDI-NCE I COMM ❑ EDUCATIONAL_7 GOV'T C RELIGiCUS _ ❑�P-A-TIO G CARP=ORT ❑ GARAGE L❑ STORAGE ❑_S LA e. FENCE _ti%urANCY _LAND USE ZO`;E C- _SLOG.TYPE _��FIRE ZONE_gp!!-PLAN CHECK BY_ Egr ,h C� �a ah-v9r► A�ni11 1�'ONw�(h et L. 1" 'o �,. w 9�ror ?A�n+_° s6ry ar- a►, » irri a 10>1 416IM SEINER PERMIT k OCC.LOAC FLOOR! ]AD HEIG14T�V NO.STORIES AREA NO.BEDROOMS VALUE s00 r BUILDING DEPARTMENT SET BACKS FRONT REAR c" –" _ LEFT RIGHT S10E 'r-rmit a1 �. �� THIS PERMIT IS I 15S - --� - l ED SUBJECT TO THE REGULATION'S CONTAINED IN THE EWLDiNG CO✓ , iGP:'!;v Cain Check S P!0 REGULATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORCINANCES. AND IT IS HEREBY A.GPEFD TXAT 7HE TJ WO9K WILL 9E DONE IN ACCOP.CANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INCD.',iPLIA!:C$ �— WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES. THE ISSUAPJCE OF THIS PER`!IT DOES Nc" WAIV2 `L htcta _ RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS. CONTRACTOR AND SUS CONTPACT0,73 TO HAVE CURRENT CITP BUSINESS ry' Z LICENSE.SEPARATE PE9.MITS REQUIRED FOR SEWER,PLUMBING AND HEATING. .;;ate Tax / Total 7 i SDC- T O PDG# AFUCAOH [GENT �g ' fBY "' `– ----- Receipt NG. ADDRESS � -v—'—_ ---- PHO!JE� DC iEWER CONVECTION $ EWER INSPECTJON $ SILO).a0 EWER SURCHARGE s#3 3 9eA I -F p f4 • ski Vol - 3.9 �1 t. Ree'! , . b�eb►I�vr►►�.E:�.w. A�Iu�s,R+� ,.. 3•/(, ao-1dQ. --q ,z�- I U i� Ei __� BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION � DATA19 �1 THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PERMIT FOR TF iE WORK HEREIN INDICATED BUILDER PHONEGy6`_Z(Z3 OR AS SHOWN AND AP?ROVED IN THE ACCONI PANYING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. OWNER PHONE p , /1e LOTPJO.ti ZS/_ oD:�— JOB ADDRESS 16106'_ II �" &• KEN C►j — -- 11 oA HITECF3".v #, W�i:i-I-UPi _9` h T54„t 1Ie1E1GR Bl11LCEA&rru* K0thn : E fl on STRUCTURE NEW 0 REMODEL � �1 ADDITION —.:]-REPAIR ❑ RENEWAL O FIRE DAMAGE ❑ DEMOLITION u RESIDENCE COMM "� EDUCATIrNAL ::; GOV'T C aELIGiOUS u PATIO u CAR PQM. _" G'1RAGF � STORAGE C] SIJ1B❑ FENCE OCCUPANCYti.LAND USE ZONE C-RL1 BLDG.TYPE _N_-FIRE ZONE _PLAN CHECK BY HEAT��_�_ ,1i` Imo, h h C° nGt0tkI4 _661140 MN FVAP11c I Vg 5 L. j^q8 SEWER PERMIT OCC.LOAD 20 FLOOR LOAD _HEIGHT S NO.STORIES AREA .2781 NO.BEDROOMS � VAL UJI 7700 r BUILDING DEPARTMEN-- 7 —� SET BACKS FRONTREAR LEFT SIDE y, �� RIGHT SIDE Pnrrnit - �LZ• 0 THIS PERMIT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN THE EUILDING CODE, ZOFt"i•^ REGULATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE. CODES AND ORDINANCES, AND IT IS HEREBY AGREED TH,'a i THE lPinnCheck I t• LJ WORK WILL BE DONE IN ACCORCANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND IN CO,'#1-PLIAtdCE WITH ALI. APPLICABLE CODES AND ORUINANCES. THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT WAIVE +Sf u`.YtC+1al S 3 . 7s RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS. CONTRACTOR AND SUB CONTRACTORS TO HAVE CURRENT CI?-f EUMNiiSS �n 7 LICENSE.SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR SEWER,PLUMBING AND HEATING. State Tax • s ��,� r. SDC— Total —_—�----- ��_�� 7 PDC# APPLICANT OR AGEN( By --- Receipt No. Approved ADDRESS PHONE i 'DC — S , EWER CONNECTION $ ��`� � at ;EVER INSPECTION $ EWER SURCHARGE � Bruce A. SamueJ81n, A.,1 .A. 35 NE 17th Avenue Portland, Oregon 912s,' PROJECT : ADDENDUM NO . 1. Benj. Franklin Federal baviny:: March 20, 1981 and Loan Association KING CITY BRANCH SELECTED GENERAL CONTRACTORS LI ; I Delete B. J. Cummings Company fruw the bidders list Remaining bidders on this project orr�: Barnard & Kinney 10125 SW Beaverton Highway Beaverton, Oregon 97005 646-2123 H & A Construction Company 9115 SW Burnahm Tigard, Oregon 97223 639-6148 Reimers & Jolivette, Inc. 435 Oregon Pionner Building Portland, Oregon 97204 228-7691 SPECIFICATION: : DIVISIONS.G .C . -- SUPPLEMENTARY GENERAL 11)NDITIONS SECTION S.G . C . -2 PERMITSFEES ANIi NOTICES SGC-28 The cost of the plan check fee for this P11"'-Ict will be included as a part of the permit fed to be paid by the contractor instead of separately as listed under SGC-2B. The Permit Fees as reported by the City of Tigard building Department are as follows: SITE: Plan Check Fee $ 89.00 Permit Fee 1;8.00 Tax 7.12 Inspection 50.00 TOTAL SITE PERMIT FEE $ ;24. 17 BUII DING: Plan Chec'( Fee $ Permit Fee S42-50 Tax IOIAI13.70 $ ')27.45 TOTAI. FOR SITE AW) BUILDING $ B51.57 I SECTION 4B GENERAL 4B-3H WATER REPELLENT TREATMENT: (New Ittim) Water repellent treatment not es;J in 4B-31, steal I he Ihuroclear 777 or approved 5% solid silicone equal meetiny Federal Specifir.,sl.iuno SS-W-1.1.0b. Apply to brick walls in two voaL a ,t tht „vuli'all tul.Al coverage of 80 sq, ft./ gallon, completely flooding Lhe s111 ,30: fur a run down of 6 to 10 inches. Alluw 24 hours between coats. Do not apply to :surfaces which have been wet or rained upon for at least the four precuoinf clays or if rain .Ls anticipated within two hours of application. Do not start water repellent treatment until the masonry cootractor approves the surface of the brick for aNplicatiin of acme. Pl'otet.t all adjacent surfaces of other materials from damage by application of thio mdterial. Do riot apply if Lemperature is expected to be Leas than 'it)() I pp y SECTION 6G INSUL.ATION 6G-1C INSTALLATION`r At second sentence, change l i, reud: :,Lapl,:�.l dt least 6 inches o.c. through vapor barrier flanges to sides of Iluor joist. 6G-ID GROUND COVERING (New Item) Install at 6 mil. black pulyethylei ie yruund cover cit ,., the ground ul Lhe crawl spare under the building. Lap joinLo 12 inch,.., ani extend up fuundation walls to a height of 12 inchf:s. SECTION 8K GLASS & GLAZ_ J 1G 8K-1 GENERAL In first line, change U.B.C. L uue ,,,Terms t. Lu: l)0 edit ion. SECTION 15A GENERAL MECHANILiii. 15A•72 C0DE The sewer hook-up fee for the :,ubjeuL p,„ lutI as repuitad by the Unified Sewage Agency in Hillsboro for the approximate 1. 1 ac:re property is as follows: 2-Dwelling unit charge $ 1,450.00 Tap Fee "0.00 Inspection 55.00 TOTAL CHARGC 2,035.00 SECTION 15B PLUMBING 15B-13 SEWAGE PUh1P Revise Paragraph 15B-13 Sewage Pump to I-Lad: Provide a PACO Model 470-01 or ,approved equal duplex submersible sewage ejector with capacity as shown on the drawings. The unit shall be furnished complete with mercury level controls, panel for remutu indoor mounting with high water starm, 54 inch diameter by 48 inch deep steel suliv with 60 Inch gastight cover. All components must be in conformance with state and N.L.i . codes fur sewage pumping equipment. DRAWINGS : DRAWING NO. 4 Section A/4 at and of note for D.T.C. clilmi at furred wall to trusses add the Following: "Provide 3/4 inch clearance between top of wall 1,1at.c: ,nd buLtom of truss chord.” Clips to be spaced at 2'-0" on center maximum. 'I DRAWING NO . E-1 ( REFLECTED CEILING PIAN ) Chanyu size of ceiling access panel noted in Jan. Cloy. Rm. #3 from 2V'x24" noted to 24" x 30" APPROVALS : SECTION 7E SHEETMETAL WORK 7E-7E METAL LOUVER AT [.LOCK TOWER Airolite K638 louver approved subject to compliance with Contract Documents. SECTION 15B PLUMUING j5B-4 HANGERS: Superstrut approved subject to compliance with Contract Documents 150-13 SEWAGE PUMP: Kenco Model 40N2 approved subject to compliance with Contract Documents. SECTION 15C HLATING VEN ( ILAIING & AIRCONDITIONING 15C-1 R0000P UNIT: YorkSunline) 'approved subject to compliance with Contrac' Documents. Unit, and ducts must perform aril It in ov;j.ilable space. ARCHITECTUrtE C1 Lb- - PiBRUCE A. SAM(Jk L SON A.I.A. �' ---- 35 __35 N F 17th Avenue • Portland. Oregon 97232 • (r)03) 239-7526 TRANSMITTAL NOTICE To: Known Plan Holders Dote: t9arch 20, 1981 Protect: flan j. Fran!:lin Federal Savings and Loan Association KING C1 TY BRANCH Transmitted herewith: Item Copies Dated Title Y` 1 1 each Mar. 20, 1981 Addendum No. 1 for Subject Project set Remarks: To be included in the Bid Price for t_hiu project and luted as included in the total price for the project Enc:At listed M BRUCVA.. IV!Vg ,.SON cc: !'r. Del Harpater W/2 encl. Bruce A. Samuelson i 1 ► .�crc-+� L_ A-�Pr�ax f o .�I Den s i ty `J SOD-brown , bloc►:y SILT w/ abundant grass Nuclear Gauge roots ; dr Yd = 96 . 1 pcf y � (21 . 1%) #JT' Very :stiff:, mottled brow+ to 1 ight ;gray , � S�� blocky SILT w/ trace grave ') ; damp , numerous .grass roots ,._.. _ 1 S-6 . ., 14- no �no pen , layer of corf►prassed organics- S,T 20 S-9. .- S-g i .. ,3. Very .stiff , med. brown, sl igot fy mottled ( - . SILT ; - damp , occasional grass roots ,�.� = ` 2 i �s - nd organics . 3 • j. Ver s �mo �l ed- an to t ra 'S--5 ` . 9 S I L,r--w/ trace f i ne sand ; damp , occa s i ona �a c► Very. 'stiff mottled dark brown . w --numer- I ` ' 3 ous black spots , . SILT ; damp , numerous .: . 7 k = organics ,: :@3 '21'. diameter wood fraglnent . t ..UJ . .. i Very stiff , medium brown SILT w/ snia•ll 1 ' pockets f -clayey SILT ; damp , occasional • - organics , has FILL texture . ;_._ . 4 }ff, O y 40 61, , .. .�.. .. : _ ' i is .\ f•• M1 ♦ .r..♦ M Ry ..1 .'►147 •A �. '► M •� : •••.4 .•"� •.r 0.41 FILL ,.,.. +.. .. •d•' ', FILL •"' TP- .� .. highly* , - , rec Stiff, dark gray to brown . ' • .. ' :.: : ': . . r to sl ightly organic clayey + + 4 -• . . • , _" -SILT ; wet , abundant roots and S-7 i zt �� - �- . �.�,* .: _ , .,. 7 plant stems ( upper' 7 "J 34. TP-5 7 . 0 ( continued next page ) I • •• LEGEND LEGEND 'T�Ac�L�rl► ,' SHELBY TUBE SAMPLE LOCATION AND NUMBER TP-4 TEST PIT LOCATION , KELLY/STRAZER ASSOCIATES 6—AAB SAMPLE LOCATION AND NUMBER WATER CONTENT (PERCENT) 13 . 1 BORING LOCATION , KELLY/STRAZER ASSOCIATES POCKET PENETROMETER (TONS PER SQUARE FOOT) FIELD DENSITY TEST (POUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT) ��f�77G S�� LOO OF PEST PIT TP -1 �� O `�0 -40 Fr Benjamin Franklin Branch > Kelly/StrazerAssociatesr Benjamin Franklin Branch - W z CWUW,f al C:or,wltAM!, OD King City , Oregon Kelly Straier Associates: •1 TEST PIT LOCATION PLAN 4 7/8/80 0-196 . 01 ,�►a�►.�,�a�,�.vw, King City , Oregon July , 1980 w• 196 . 01L 1 .... F q::' -1 FIG. 2 ..._.___.....__ - ..� FIG. 1 ..,. dam...- ; :::,• .. ,... ;k .., .,.,,,.�,,,,,,,,,,.,�„�,, ...•. . P, IAtt I lli t ' I'llltll 11 l I.rIi11 t + �'i'I~ III t � � ti��iYi � 1 r '1i 1' , � 1 t � � t � ! II II tl ► III l � t � �� I � t � t � 1 111 � t � t Ilt Ilt 1111111 11till I iltit11 tlt � �lt lll � lt ! Ill � llr 1 ! ` ! 11 I � � � � � � I � � I I I • � I I I .I I I ' ..W>W,•i w �,.,,y,,...v.w,��4. _,� 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I}0 I I 12 NOTE : IF THIS M ICROF I LME D • 1 DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOT IGE `ZT IS DUE TO THF QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL -'-'DRAWING. OE 6? 9Z 1Z 92 S2. bZ EZ Z? 12 0 61 91 LI 91 SI VI El 21 11 OI 6I 9 1 9 S b E � <<!IIIIII�tI11�Ittt�tttt�itit�tttltltlt�111tI11lI�IIIIIiIII�ItItltlttl��1��t��l��tt�a<stt�lllt�llll�Illllll�ltlt�lli►��Illlt' Ii��1111I1111I611lINIl111lIIll1�lH11�11111111lIIlllllill�IlllIIIIIIIIIIIl11�It�{1�1,�Ulllllll�ltllllllllllll�llllhUjl�ll� Illl�Il11I1�,ll�UI1111�11 �t111 r r r r r sw 13[_1RGSTA,HLEF,, HOLMES, $Affloft Fl�SSUCIATFS Consulting Engineers 4504 SW Corbett Ave. PORTLAND, OREGON 97201 DATE JO* Nr], \ -01 _ (563) 226-6501 ATTENTION 3/13/81 261-80 Ed Waldon or Don Howick 31 40 [0 City of Ti ti-d IRE: Benjamin Franklin - King City 12420 S. W. (•gain __--- ____--— .---- - -- - -- - Tigard, Oregon 97223 -- - - GENTLEMEN: --- -- -- -------- ----- -WE ARE SENDING YOU It Attached Cl Under separate cover via ..the following items: ❑ Shop drawings f 1 Prints [-] Plans U Samples U Specifications E I Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ _._-_ COPIES DATE NO. CESCRIPTION 1 2/16/81 b page , Calculations_ for the above-referenced project., - (HESE APE TRANSMITTED as checked belOW: i-1 For approval ❑ Approved as submitted U Resubmit.... ..--copies for approval For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution [.l As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return____corrected prints [ I For review and comment ❑ [I FOR BIDS DUE 19 - ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS-----_-__-_-_ -- _- COPY TO Bruce Sautuelson, Architect-__- — 12 SIGNED: ? ✓YYL-Lee. 1 oar 74D-AvsNSON kem(-,*141 a.e�en.rm rltse It enclnsures en not as noted, kindly notify us d once —_--- Lt-ry P RAMN /*J -lies Is- oa' Sud e4Arm 0�. No&r- 'PLO.., 41 s Q TUALATIN RURAL FInr r'ROTECTION DIS7RIC1 NOTICE OF PLANS REVIEW --*+ PO BOX 127, TUALATIN CR 97062 4 Vjj0 PHONE (S03) 682-2601 (THIS IS NOT A BUILDING PERMIT) t��l( Building BENJAMIN FRANKLIN FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN, KING CITY, OREGON HUILUINC, ADDRESS County—WASH jjNGTON __Occupancy_ a-2 _ Const. V_N _- _ FMZ_�342 ____Pg 1 of— Archllect—BNIA T A _New Bldg YA Addition O Alteration O Date Received o e 8 Owner_ BENJAMIN FRANKLIN _--- Address 1 S.W. COLUMBIA,PORTLDateReturned 3-23-81 Slopes-.---1---Area?A n _ /F At11c-g-,§� �1 Fire Walls NONE Exits_l / 12 it R HA",LMEN1 S TOT WIDTH Slabs NP&_ /--Vert. Shafts kl/ _ /_ Spnnklers. _ / /_ Alarm N S S.P N S / — /+_ clOSED t CLu1.EU O VES AREA C.OVD INT SIZE Exl Ext _ _p�R 1W1t _�ly_s,,— / / Floor WOOD ceiling_ SUSP•-Roof CLASS it. Members WOOD___ I SS 7VF,EARFA COVD Wall cover_WD/BRK / GYP _- Htr rm encl .NIS _Type flue_ — _ Type Hlg.System FA Fuel EXT I'll The submitted plans have been reviewed for conformity with fire protection statutes and regulations of Oregon administered by this office Items No. checked on the enclosed list are applicable.These items and any specially noted provisions must be incorporator=d into the project to meet current fire protection regulations Approval of submitted plans is not an approval of omissions or oversights by this office or of noncompliance with any applicable regulations of local government. 4 REMARKS: Plans are reviewed for conformance with the 1979 Edition of the Oregon State Struct- ural Specialty Code and Fire and Life Safety Code and local ordinances. 1. An attic access opening not legs than 22" x 30" shall be provided with a minimum of 30" atttic Headroom. Section 32'05(a) . (Must give access to all portions of the attic with a vertical height of 30") . 2. Fire stops, blocking or framing members pierced for utility runs require packing to equal fire resistance prior to such piercing. Wood frame construction requires firestopping of both vertical and horizontal draft openings at maximum intervals of 10 feet. Section 2517(f) . 3. Handrails are required on all Stairways. Stairways over 44" wide need handrails on both sides. Set-tion 3305(j). 4. Open stair railings and guardrails shall have intermediate rails or closures with no openings large enough to pass a 9" sphere. Section 1717. 5. Surface flame spread rates of walls and ceilings, minimum requirements: stairway - 25, corridors -75, other rooms - 200. Section 4203. 6. A firefighting water supply is required within 750 feet of all portions of :he building that is capable of producing 500 gpm (ininimum) for 10 minutes for each 5000 sq.ft. of floor area within building up to a maximum of 500 gpm for 30 minutes. Must be provided by owner prior to framing. EXAMINED ev Jim Kenworthy COPIES TO Gene-11rrhil.l,_.1.;_23gtrd. I 3UU 18 ARCHITECTURE basiBRUCE A. SAMUELSON A.I.A. 35 N.E. 17th Avenue • Portland, Orc,gon 97232 • (503) 239-7526 March 6, 1981 Project: Benj. Franklin Federal Savings and Loan Association KING CITY BRANCH Mr. Don Howick City of Tigard 1242F, S.W. Main Street Ticard, Oregon 97223 The following information is in responsQ to your request for information regarding the Permit Applicaiton for the subject p-oject. The information regarding the tax .lotnumber will be forwarded as soon as mailable as the information we have to date is only the meets and bounds. PROPERTY SIZE: (minus the street widening) 2.1 ,812.4 Sq. Ft. (0.504 acres) LSTIMATE: OFFSITE Site Work: $ 6,400.00 ONSITE Site Work: Stripping, compacting & top soil $ 1.2,100.00 Concrete walks, curbs & paving $ 10,750.00 Base slab & pavers $ 3,300.00 Drainage $ 1,200.00 Plumbing ( C4 5' from building) $ 4,750.00 Electrical ( post lanterns ) $ 3,875.00 Landscaping & irrigation $ 10,500.00 Total for On-Site Site work: $ 29,575.00 13UILDING ( incl. Plumb. , HVAC, & Elect. ) $120,750.00 Gen. Conditions, O.H. & P. , & Permits $ 24,375.00 Total estimate of costs $187,500.00 Sincerly, Bruce A. Samuelson, A.I .A. rc . Mr. Del HarpoLer o • C 12 , 100 . 00 + 10050 . 00 + 3 , 300 . 00 + 1 , 200 . 00 + 49750 . 00 + 3 , 1375 . 00 + I 100500 . 00 + 007 46 , 475 . 00 62400 . 00 + 120 , 750 . 00 + 24075 . 00 + 010 198 , 000 . 00 001 198 , 000 . 00GT 0 • C ARCHITECTURE bcl BRUCE A. SAMUELSON A.I.A. 35 N.E. 17th Avenue • Portland, Oregon 97232 (503) 239-7526 TRANSMITTAL NOTICE To: Tigard Building Department Date: March 5, 1981 Tigard, Oregon Project: Benj. Franklin Federal Savings and Loan Association KING CITY BRANCH Transmitted herewith: Item Copies Dated Title 1 3 sets Mar. 2, 1981 Drawings and Specifications for the subject project. Remarks: Y This information is being submitted for Plan Check review. The enclosed prints have been approved by the City of King City and are so marked. Bids on this project are due on March 240 1981. The selected contractor will pick- up and pay for the Permits. Selected Contractors for this project -,re: 11. & A. Construction Company Barnard & Kinney Reimers & Jolivette Enc: As listed -- BRU�§ A. SAWLSON CC: Mr. Uel Harpster Bruce A. Samuelson FLIT S 1 rij� .rZ 4326��\�r U-` O Ct[CUd 24 BURC9TAHLER, HOLME9r CARLSON co"MIXIM moct""m 4W4 S W Cort W Ponhd. Oregon. 97701 � I �i T r� ------------- LL dL r II 0-0 r � I c Hl1RGSTAHLRR, HOLMRS, CARLSON 1 r'4 'l T VMWrLnno oaan+uM 4W4 5 w CalbW ►a+bd.orrp�. n�o� 0 1 .r— _ _ _ : - 1. — �j 7 ri•J; err i i 1 i 4 i BURGSTAHL6R, HOIAES, CAR1.90N 1�SN ;r ^ •,''' 1501 i W (ab*" Pow.w,d C�mw) . 91701 -- 2.70� Q�r+�-�", f3'Tk!. �v.bT,-,r..��•�..c t �/E�T•,^�•�., J LALMRLMLP 40 L t ) .:7•:] t-t - le SA, .�6 : -� � o .c 1•'1 t = 1 Z� to i BURGSTAHLFR. HOLME9, CARLAON 4504 S W Ccrbs" a � U 1 iS C:r r i /a = Z G I It1'RG14'1'AHI.FR. HOLMFS. CARLSON C•WMLn.nrc IMF"tERS ASOA S W (Arbor , pop Or"m, 97"1 --- .a I -7L� V,/ 17- 610-Coo ,A ,c 1 ri J fiCTb j 1 70 O BURGSTANUM, HOMES, CARMN IIG t'N G Gt M-wa,M WaIN •sw a w.terbW Fe ku OMOM f?nl �w s 0-196.01 Kefy l Strazer Associatec, ',eutec'nilical ConaUltalIts January 5, 1981 Mr. Bruce A. Samuelson , A. I .A. 35 N.E. 17th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97232 GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW-REVISED BUILDING BENJAMIN FRANKLIN SAVINGS & LOAN KING CITY, OREGON Dear Bruce: At your request we have reviewed your preliminary Site Plan, transmitted on December 6, 1980 for the subject project. This drawing represents several project revisions which include: 1 . Smaller building - same construction 2. Addition of a concrete vault (9' -10" by 10 '-6" by approx. 10'-0" high, interval dimensions) with 12" thick walls, floor and roof. 3. Crawl space at approximately elevation 177.5 feet. 4. Finished floor elevation of 182.0' . 5. Reduction in surrounding site fill to about 2 feet, typically. 5. Elimination of retaining wall along north property boundary. 7. South wall of building has been moved about 6 feet to north. In addition, we visited the site and reviewed the time rate of settlement results of the consolidation test which was in progress when our initial report was submitted. Our site visit revealed a slight softening of the typical uppe.• surfaces due to the recent rains and noticeable softening along the slope banks. lot 0-196.01 Bruce A. Samuelson, A. I .A. January 5, 1981 Page 2 Using the vault dimensions noted above, we calculate a vault dead load of about 1 . 1 ksf, which includes about 2 feet, of fill beneath the floor. Neglecting live loads to the vault, we estimate about 1 .5 inches of vault settlement due to primary consolidation. Live loads would induce slight additional primary settlement, undetermined at this time and dependent on the magnitude of live load. Additional long terra settlement during the life of the structure would Produce an additional estimated 3/4-inch of settlement. The current plans for floor crawl space, and adjacent grades is similar to the original design. The crawl space would require typical excavations of about 1 .5 to 2 fl-et, zero at the southwest corner. Typically, 2 to 5 feet of grading fill would be placed around the structure on all sides. The structure foundation loads are typically light and estimated settlements arc, on the order of 1/2 to 3/4-inch. The vault is a sigi.;ficart structural load of relatively large areal extent compared with the building foundation. We estimate that approximately 3/4 to 1 inch of differential settlement is Possible betwe::;i the vault and the building if all structural loads were applied instantaneously. The landscaping tills are an additional source of settlement to the building, also due their, large areal extent compared with the building foundations. There is also potential for slightly more settlement on the south end of the building because of lesser amounts of fill 'there, especially near the top of bank and adjacent slope. Areas below existing elevation 178 feet. are most susceptible to differential settlement from structural and fill loads. Available alternates to construct the building as sited depend on the level of risk acceptable to the owner. These would include the following in order of increasing risk: i I I . W t nlr 0-196.01 Bruce A. Samuelson, A. I .A. January 5, 19£31 Page 3 A. Place the t-J'Iding foundations and vault on piles. Use either driven timber or trilled, cast-in-place concrete piles. Desig�j loads to 20 tons per pile. Two additional soil borings to depths of about; 50 feet would be required. B. Remove softened slope and surface materials in footing arias, replace these areas with structural fill and p'ace compacteu site tills and surcharge new fills and vault area. Surcharge to extend 5 feet minimum into perimeter of building over, footings. Monitor surface of surcharge for estimated 4 to 6 weeks or until settlement rates are acceptable. C. Remove softened areas of slope and surface in footing areas , replace with compacted structural fill . Place site fills within 30 feet of building and construct entire vault prior to any other construction. Load vault floor with gravel equal to 1 .5 times estimated live load. Alternate C above would enable most of the primary or initial settlement to occur, but secondary long terns settlements could add an estirrkited 1/2 to 3/4 inch of settlement over the life of the structure (estimated 50 years) . This settlement could be differential between areas which have maximum fill and those which have rninimorj fill . Similar long term settlements would apply to the vault. Alternate B (surcharge scheme) would account for primary and a portion of long term settlement by temporarily overloading the fills. Long term ntotal 11e and differential settlements would be substantially reduced by the temporary overloading prior to construction. In our opinion Alternate C would be acceptable if the long terra settlement can be tolerated and if the new fills are monitored during and following placement t� 0-196.01 Bruce A. Samuelson , A. I .A. January 5, 1981 Paye 4 to verify estimated settlements. Alterr.ate B is preferred to more adeos;ately accoun, for the long term settlements. It could be ado:oted if observed settlements duriny Alternate C were larger, than anticipated. Although our test p:ts indicated a good fill quality with average compaction, in the absence of a quality control report there remains a certain question regarding uniformity of the fill and the conditions of the ground over which it was placed. Therefore we recommend that all foundation excavations be reviewed together with settlement data prior to construction. We look forward to the opportunity to discuss these and other alternatives with you. Please feel free to contact us should you have any questions. Very truly your;, KELLY/STRAZER ASSOCIATES, INC. Robert J. Str er, P.E. RJS:vL G• 196.01 Kelly/Strazer Associates Geotechnical Consultants August 7, 1980 Bruce A. Samuelson A. I.A. 35 N.E. 17th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97232 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION AND REPORT PROPOSED BENJAMIN FRANKLIN FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION KING CITY BRANCH KING CITY, OREGON Gentlemen: We have completed the geotechnical investigation on the subject project in general acc( Aance with our proposal to you dated June 25, 1980. This report is a compilation of the field, laboratory and office studies. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The site is located on the north side of S.W. Pacific Highway at the entrance drive to Tebo 's Restaurant and the adjacent shopping center. The curving access drive forms the east boundary of the site. The north property line measures about 95 feet, the south line is 226 feet and the west is 148 feet. Topographically, the site slopes gently westward from the access drive curb line at about elevation 182 feet to elevation 179 feet. The south 15 to 25 feet of the site slopes downward for 4 to 6 vertical feet to meet origin&l ground. We understand that from 3 to possibly 7 or 8 feet of fill was placed on the site in 1975 or 1976. It is reported that the fill was "engineered" which we interpret to mean that it was placed under controlled conditions t 3906 S W Kelly Avenue Portland,Oregon 97201 503-222-2820 0-196.01 Bruce A. Samuelson August 7, 1980 Page 2 of moisture and compaction. No other data is available. The intent of this investigation was to determine the quality of the fill and the soil types over which it was placed. The proposed single-story frame building with brick veneer will be supported on perimeter continuous footings with two rows of column footings within the main east portion of the building and 9 interior columns within the west projection from the main building. The floor will be structurally supported on post and beams with a crawl space below. Finished floor was originally planned at elevation 181 .0 feet with a crawl space at 177.83 feet. Finished floor elevation was revised to elevation 183.67 feet. At 183.67 feet, the site will require an additional 3 to 4 feet of fill on the east, north and west sides of the building and an estimated 5 to 9 feet of fill at the south- west corner where the building is sited beyond the existing bank line. A cantilever retaining wall is planned from the southwest building corner to roughly parallel the south property line at a distance of about 8 feet. Maximum wale height will be about 9 feet at the building and drop to about 4 feet near the southwest corner of the site. The north and west sides of the site will be graded for parking and landscaping. FIELD EXPLORATIONS Field explorations consisted of five (5) backhoe-excavated test pits, designated TP-1 through TP-5, at the locations shown on Figure 1 . The backhoe was provided under subcontract by Joe Kappers Excavating. The test pits were typically excavated to depths of 11 feet. Test Pit TP-2 penetrated to 5.3 feet and TP-5 went to 9.8 feet. Following notification that the building and adjacent grades would be raised, i we determined that addition of significant fill stresses over large areas would require a test borinq to better evaluate the soils at depths below the test pit explorations. The boring (designated B-1 ) was drilled at the approximate r M wMM 0-196.01 Bruce A. Samuelson August 7, 1980 Page 3 location between TP and TP-4 as shown on Figure 1 . The boring was drilled by Donald A. Kenner Drilling using a truck-mounted CME rotary rig and bentonite mud. curing test pitting, three (3) in-place field density tests were performed in the fill with a Troxler nuclear densometer at the locations shown on the test pit logs. An engineer from our firm developed a field log of the test pits and boring and collected representative jar samples of the soils encountered. Two un- disturbed tube samples were taken in the test pits and two from the boring together with three field density tests using a nuclear densometer. Large bag samples were taken immediately below the density tests to determine laboratory maximum densities. ILogs of the test pits are presented on Figures 2 through 6 and the boring log is shown on Figure 7. These indicate soil strata, sample type and location and estimated groundwater levels. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions consist of a surficial fill to depths of about 5.5 to 7.0 feet in the building area. It was difficult to discern the fill contact with the original ground because the fill was in many cases similar to the natural ground. The notations of fill thickness on the test pit and boring 1 logs represent our best visual estimate and appears compatible with visual site topography. The fill consists of irregular layers of very stiff to stiff Isilts and clayey silts with occasional small organic fragments and occasional thin zones of compressed organics. The latter zones apparently reflect Iperiodic filling with vegetative growth intervals. Pecket penetrometer readings on the side walls of the test pits were typically high and were used to define the stiff to very stiff classification. I 0-196.01 Bruce A. Samuelson August 7, 1980 Page 4 Underlying the surficial man-made fill was observed the apparent original ground which cods;qts of a soft organic silt zone with numerous plant stems and roots in the upper 6 to 8 inches. This zone was difficult to log at depth in the test pts because our inspector could not safely enter the pit at those depths and coUld not get a good representative sample due to the groundwater. The thickness r,as, however, logged as about 2.5 feet in Boring B-1 from 7 to 9.5 in depth. We interpret this zone to be the original ground surface which exists to the west of the site as swampy, low-lying and poorly drained. Original ground was encountered in TP-1 and TP-2 at about elevation 174 feet and at about elevation 170 to 171 .5 feet in TP-4, TP-5 and B-1 , suggesting Ia pre-existing slope of the original ground to the west. Boring B-1 encountered about 5 feet of very stiff silt and fine sandy silt underlying the organic silt zone and overlying loose to medium dense green to gray green silty fine sand. occasional gradational changes to 'fine sandy Isilt were observed together with occasional thin zones of organics. 'The Standard Penetration Test resistance values typically increased with depth in the zone from about 6 to 26 blows per foot of sample penetration. The test pit logs classified the upper several feet of this stratum as slightly organic due to presence of an organic odor from the test pits. Once again, the depth of the pits and intrusion of groundwater precluded accurate description Iof representative soil samples removed from the test pits. Groundwater levels were estimated based on the depth at which the underlying silts appeared saturated. There is an apparent rise in the estiwated water surface from about elevation 167 to 169 at TP-4 and TP-5 to 17L to 174 at TP-1 a,,.1 TP-2. Accurate water levels would have required observations in the open I pits for longer periods than were available during explorations. I LABORATORY TESTING ILaboratory testing was limited to moisture contents on all samples and visual classification prior to preparation of the test pit and boring logs. One 0-196.01 Bruce A. Samuelson August 7, 1980 Page 5 sample each of the fill and the underlying organic silt were subjected to consolidation tests to determine the relative compressibility of the soils. The results of the tests are plotted as percent strain versus the logarithm of applied stress and are presented on Figures 8 and 9. In addition, bag samples at field density test locations were moisture conditioned and compacted to ASTM D-0698 standards for compUrison with field densities. The results are: Field Dry Lab Dry Test Location Depth ft) Denstt cf) Density pcf) ;,Compaction TP-1 , S-9 0.7 96.1 102.5 94% TP-2, S-1 3.3 92.0 100.6 91% TP-4, S-7 5.5 91 .9 101 .3 91% ENGINEERING_ CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Our recommendations are based on the following structural data: Interior Column Loads: 6 kips (typical) I6-9 kips range 15 kips maximum (one only) Exterior Wall Loads: 2 kips/foot Vault 1 .5 kips over 9 square feet IFloor Structurally supported an post and beams This data suggests that lightly loaded foundations will result. More importa-t I is the loading that will be iiduced to the site soils by the approximately 3 to 4 feet of fill to be typically added around the building and the small Iamount within the crawl space. Such fill loadings will influence the subsurface soils to great depth because of the relao-ively large area of loading. The most significant fill load would occur rear the southwest corner of the buil� ing where interpolation indicates that, up to 9 feet of additional fill will be placed. I 0-196.01 Bruce A. Samuelson August 7, 1980 Page 6 In general , the consolidation tests indicate that the fill and the underlying organic silt strata exhibit low to moderately compressible characteristics within the stress increase range anticipated. We estimate that the typical fill loads would produce settlements on the order of 1/2 to 3/4 inches. The maximum fill depth could produce in excess of 11 to 2 inches of settlement. The Fettlements would result from consolidation of the fill , the organic silts and underlying loose sand zones. Because of the raise in finished floor grade to elevation 183.67 feet, there will no longer be a need to excavate (remove load) from the crawl space area which is planned at approximately elevation 180.5 feet, maximum. The area currently exists at about this elevation. It is our opinion that the apparent difference in settlement produced by the varying fill loads in combination with naturol soil variations over the site could result in significant d-'fferential settlements to the structure. Accordingly, we recommend that the buildir!y site and retaining wall area be preloaded prior to construction. T-,is procedure would place a temporary fill atop final fill grades in and arourd the structure to pre-settle the site and reduce the potential for differential settlements. Our recommendations are contained in the following paragraphs. Site Preparation. We recommend that the surficial sod zone be stripped from the building; site and all areas to receive fills or pavements. The test pits indicate that 2 to 4 inches of sod exists. The primary goal is to strip the surface vegetation and major root zone. The stripped vegetation and soil may be used in non-structural or non-paved fills and/or wasted. Grading. Grading fills should be placed following stripping to the lines and grades desired on the final plan. As a minimum, the required fill within and 15 feet adjacent to the building and retaining wall should be placed 0-196.01 Bruce A. Samuelson August 7, 1980 Page 7 initially. The remainder of the site fill probably will be derived from the temporary surcharge. The fill in all areas beneath the structure, retaining wall and 5 feet beyond these should be placed as structural fill as defined below. Planter areas or other areas not required for structural or pavement support should be placed in 6-inch lifts and compacted without a specified degree of compaction, method or quality. Structural Fill . Structural fill should be placed in maximum 6-inch lifts and compacted with a suitable mechanical compactor to a dry density of at least 95% of the maximum dry density obtained by the Standard Proctor procedure (ASTM D-698) . The moisture content of the fill should be adjusted to within ±2% of optimum and the compacted surface should be firm and unyielding to rubber tired construction traffic. Spongy, rutting or pumping fill is suspect of excessive moisture and shoo d be rejected. The specified quality of the structural fill should consider the time of year during which the fill will be placed. Fine-grained soils (silts, class) or granular soils (sands, gravels) with high fines content are critical to moisture and it is extremely difficult to control the moisture-density relationship during wet weather. These, however, can be compacted to specification during dry periods. Corrinon Pacific Northwest practice requires that the fines content be less than 5 percent for an "all-weather" structural fill material . Soil fines are defined as the soil passing the number 200 sieve by wet sieve analyses based on the 3/4-inch minus fraction. The ultimate requirement for a structural fill is a material which can be compacted to specifications, during the ,prevailing weather conditions, without unusual delays. We recommend that the limited structural fill required on this project be specified as "all-weather" as described below. Such fill would be required primarily as subgrade beneath paved areas, curbs and within the building lines. 0-196.01 Bruce A. Samuelson August 7, 1980 Page 8 Preloading. Following placement of the grading fills to the minimum areal requirement, we recommend that a temporary preload fill be added to reduce potential differential settlements. The preload material may consist of any soil type available and placed to a height of about 4 feet so as to exert a net load of about 400 psf. An additional 200 psf is recommended ;n the southwest corner of the area where site filling is deepest and larger settle- ments are anticipated. We recommend that the Entire building site and retaining wall area be preloaded to full fill height at least 5 feet beyond the building and retaining wall lines. The sketch on Figure 10 and plan on Figure 1 outlines the recommendation. The quality and placement of the preload fill are not crucial because the fill is being used only for weight. Some compaction is prudent to seal the fill from excessive moisture. To avoid hauling fill in then out, many projects utilize materials designated for other areas in the preload. Then these are removed after preloading to the designated areas. The time requirea for preloading is difficult to jstim?te because of the numerous variables which affect the rate of consolidation We est'mite that from 2 to 4 weeks may be required, however, we caution that preloading could take several more weeks. Our cautior is based on the apparent aesen;P of good subsurface drainage layers. Foundations. Based on our explorations, field density tests and laboratory compaction tests, it -is Pur opinion that the existing man-made fill is suitable for foundation suppor''- of the proposed building at light fooLing pressures. We recommend that the footing foundations be designed for an allowable soil pressure of 1500 psf. The base of all exterior footings should be located at least 2 feet below exterior grade and one foot below crawl space grade. The footings should he a minimum of 16 inches wide for continuous and 24 inches square for column footings. Maximum toe pressure on the cantilever retaining wall should also be limited to 1500 psf. We recommend that all footings within ithe crawl space be backfilled. I 0-196.01 Bruce A. Samuelson August 7, 1980 Page 9 With these reconunendations, we estimate that total settlements of the structure will be minimal , on the order of J-inch with a possibility of 1-inch differential settlement between column points. These estimates are for structural loading only and assume that preloading has effectively pre-settled the site fills. Following placement of the preload, we recommend that 6 to 8 hubs be established on site and referenced to a stable benchmark off-site. We suggest future readings to monitor settlement be taken at 4 days and 7 days, then at weekly intervals thereafter from the initial reading. Retaining Wall . We recommend that toe bearing pressures be limited to 1500 psf as in other fOUndations. Granular, backfill is recommended behind the wall to limit lateral loads and provide drainage. An equivalent lateral fluid pressure (active) of 35 pcf is re, omnended for, design, assuming a level backfill . To provide positive drainage behind the wall , a backfill drain, installed as shown on Figure ll , is recomnended. Excavation. All excavation for foundations should be conducted without disturbance to subgrade soils. Toothless or level-edged buckets are recommended for this purpose together with hand cleaning and recompaction as necessary. Backfill . All backfill against exterior foundation which will be required to support pavements, walks or other structural features should be placed and compacted as structural fill . Backfill placed in non-structural use areas and against interior footings should be tamped in 6-inch lifts without specified compaction criteria . Special considerations are required behind the cantilever retaining wall . Drainage. In order to prevent possible accumulation of water in the crawl space we recommend that a continuous footing drain be installed similar to the retaining wall drain detail shown on Figure 11 . KA�_ �MKKJKKMWK� 0-196.01 Bruce A. Samuelson August 7, 1980 Page 10 Pavement. We understand that the selected pavement section will include a 91-inch base and levelling course of crushed rock and 21-inches of csphaltic concrete. This section appears adequate for the observed site conditions. All base course material should be compacted to structural fill specifications. Additionally, it should be a well-graded sand to gravel with minimal fines percentage subject to your (our) approval . We further reconmend that the entire pavement area subgrade be proof-rolled with a loaded dump truck to detect soft areas, should they occur. These should be stripped out and replaced with compacted base material . GENERAL NOTES This report was prepared solely for the Architect and Engineer for the design of the project. We encourage its review by bidders and/or the contractor as it ;,elates to factual data only (logs of boring and test pits and laboratory data) . The opinions and recommendations contained within the report are riot intended to be nor should they be construed to represent a warranty of subsurface conditions but are forwarded t) assist in the planning and design process. If, during construction, unexpected subsurface conditions are encountered within excavations, we should be notified at once so that we may review such conditions and revise our recommendations, if necessary. We request that we be retained to review the applicable portions of the plans and specifications for `he project prior to bidding for conformance to our recommendations. We would be pleased to provide on-site observations, fill control and review of preload data on a periodic basis to assist you. Please feel free to contact pis regarding such work as well as fir any questions which might arise regarding this report. Very truly yours, KELLY/STRAZER ASSOCIATES, INC. l,e. , Robert J. Strazer, PFf. RJS-vt Enclosure: Figures 1-11 (continued from previouspager Stiff, dark gray and brown, highly to slightly organic, slightly clayey SILT; wet, abundant 8 roots and plant stems in upper V. q ®S-8:. _ i. (30.0) LU 10 �.... _.. _ LL o : Bottom of Test Pit @ 11 Feet Completed 7/8/80 •i LEGEND SHELBY TUBE SAMPLE _(CATION AND NUMBER 1 GRAB SAMPLE LOCATION AND NUMBER WATER CONTENT(PERCENT) POCKET PENETROMETER(TONS PER SQUARE FOOT) FIELD DENSITY TEST(POUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT) j Krlly/Strazer Associ:�tes, Benjamin Franklin Branch LOG OF TEST PIT TP-44 King City, Oregon (G("1.) July, 1980 0-196.01 F I G. 2 G-vO �r _SOD �2" Very 'stiff', brown w/ red-brown mottling, SILT; dry to damp, oc ;asional roots and organic fibers. 1 W N • W = 34"... W 3 Very stiff, dark brown'lSILT; damp. "I a Stiff, medium brown, slightly mott_l.ed, o SILT ; damp. 4 8" ..: Very stiff, dark to light gray, sl ightl,y clayey, SILT; dimp. Density Nuclear Gauy a = pcf • �' (92 O1 _ .. 6 . 30 'T % 64". : (nuc. ) 'Bottom of-Test Pit -T_ Completed 7/8/80 S-1 6 - LEGEND SHELBY TUBE SAMPLE LOCATION AND NUN;',!F R GRAB SAMPLE LOCATION AND NUMBER I WATER CONI INT(PEHCENT) POCKET PENETROMETER(TONS PER SOUAHE FOOT) T FIELD DENSITY TEST(POUNDS PEH CUBIC FOOT) Kelly/Strazer Assmiates, Benjamin Franklin Branch LOG OF TEST PIT TP-2 C.eo�ec�.rraico,J�va King City, Oregon July, 19BO 0-196.01 FIG. ;1 I �, 5.w.F,�c_•� A.VPao.C. I`T9.1 � . .. 0 SOU, stif i, SILT w/ trace gravel ; dry, abuno, - gras, ' oots. 5" a Ver stiff brown w/ trace mottling, ' no pen Y ► ® 1' • SILT w/ occasional fine gravel ; dry to (46 7) q r damp, numerous roots. <<.i _.., • 3.75 _ . 4.2 2511 1/8" layer organicTVery stiff, dark brown, SILT wl occasional MI5-2�2?'� slightly weathered gravels; d?:;ip, W'S-3��a,9� • 4. 1 occasional fine roots, Cv Stiff, tan w/ rust mottling, clayey SILT (�S_ W 3 w/ occasional smal l sand pockets (1") ;damp 2.5 T 38" Stiff, medium to dark brown slightly o mottled(w/ occasional black organic �IS-� z5, • 2.0 spots) , slightly clayey SILT; damp, zss� I FILL texture. :. 4 i 2my Stiff(?) , mottled gray, brown & rust, clayey SILT w/ weathered slightly silty RjS�.$) ine sand layers, damp'. 66" S-6 Soft to rredium stiff, dark gray-brown s1, organic SILT; damp, numerous plant _roots ibl 6 and Stems in upper 6 to 8" OS-8 i (Z�.z) M �� 7.5' LEGEND Bottom c esti P��TTTee_eT— IV" al Completed 7/8/80 11-rep SHELBY LUBE SAMPLE LOCATION AND NUMBER WA-Ma TA. e— i GRAB SAMPLE LOCATION AND NUMBER ( WATER CONTENT(PERCENT) • POCKET PENETROMETER(TONS PER SQUARF FO-YT, FIELD DENSITY TEST(POUNDS PER CUBIC FOCT) Kelly/Strazer Associates, Be:0amin Franklin Branch LOG OF TEST PIT TP-3 CIO" 4tw1kWCanxit.v[, King City, Oregon 1 July, 1980 0-196.01 FIG. 4 SOD-brown, SILT w/ abundant roots;idrv. 4.. i::. • 4.5+ Very stiff; brown to dark brown. SILT_; ,4.�� damp, trace gravel , occasional roots. - _.. • . . .1 .... .... no pen 2 .. _ • no pen ?. _ .25 2811 .s-tiff; r.>gttled brown & rust SILT; damp pjS-3(x,0) • 2.25 nuri,c;-ous fine roots. _q 5t� f, rown to ar rown, s1g t y w clayey SILT; damp, trace organics. • 4.25 LU 3 38" z S} iff to very stiff, mottled brown,- rust o - irk brown, sl ightly clayey _SILT w/ - • 3.75 W a.undaet %,oed & charcoal (e, ?deuce of R5,5 fi ^e) reddish baked earth; damp 4 _ _. : • 2.0 FILL. _ 52" Iredium stiff to stiff, brown & gray • 2.0 mottled, slightly clayey SILT; damp, occasional organics, trace pla,It seems, ®S,6 • 1.0 5 has FILL texture. (za3 Possible (nuc) FILL S-7 Density (t6.s> Nuclear Gauge 6 td= 91.9 c f 30.3%� i (continued nex , s lee N = LEGEND 4 SHELBY TUBE SAMPLE l OCA110N AND NUMBER ® GRAB SAMPLE I.00ATION AND NUMc3ER WATER CONTENT(PERCFNT) e • POCKET PENETROMETER(TONS PER SOUARE FOOT) -._r _ FIELD DENSITY TEST(POUNDS PEF, ;UB.0 FOOT Benjamin Franklin Branch LOG OF TEST PIT TP-4 Kelly/Strazer /►ssociatest King City, Oregon C.ecArchrcu msIt.�.. 7/8/80 0-196.01 FIG. 5 7 Medium stiff, dark gravw/ brownmottling, (sl . organic -slightly clayey SILT; damp wet below approx. 8 feet, max. 1" roots in upper 6 to 8 ". 8 _ 8.0 _.... S-8 10 10 r- Uj i Ili Bottom of Test Pit pCompleted 7/8/80 LEGEND �' Ll SHELBY TUBE SAMPLE LOCATION AND NUMBER IGRAB SAMPLE LOCATION AND NUMBER I ( WATER CONTENT(PERCENT) !! POCKET PENETROMETER(TONS PER SQUARE FOOT) I i FIELD DENSITY TEST(POUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT) _ Benjamin Franklin Bra,lch 1-00 OF TEST PIT TP-4 Ke11y/Strazer AssocLitest I(X)NT.) r I King City, Oregon duly, 1980 0-196.01 r �- FIG. 5 (c--,-1r) i 0 �,xzFac.r: E4— /S. 174--42 SOD - brown SILT w/ numerous roots. 311 Very stiff, medium brown SILT ; damp, occasional worm & gopher holes, *3.25 numerous roots. 1 04.0 S-1 fk.(-) _ 18' 04. 5 ann to 1fight gray clayey--------Idan 5-1 -Z • 7 4.25 2 _ ( f� . • Very stiff, medium to dark brown, pIS-3 slightly mottled SILTw/ occasional fine (z 5,0) J to medium gravel ; damp, occasional roots 2 7 -� FILL texture. _ LL- UJ L- UJ w ULI 3 3.0 ® S-4 arZZb� o 1.6 46" 4 Medium stiff to stiff, dark brown SILT Z S-5 ep w/ occasional rust spots; damp, occasional roots. 03.3 -- •3.7. 7.5 71 zaTi M 06-Tu D 9 1081, Ti�Fl� Medium stiff, dark gray slightly mottled brawn, slightly organic, fine sandy ® S-6 SILT, wet. o Bottom of Tes+ Pit @ 9.8' 117" Completed 7/8/80 LEGEND 11 SHELBY TUBE SAMPLE LOCATION AND NUMBER GRAB SAMPLE LOCATION AND NUMBER WATER CONTENT(PERCENT) e POCKET PENETROMETER(TONS PER SOUARE FOOT) FIELD DENSITY TEST(POUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT) Krlly/Strayer rlsso(L0t-s Benjamin Franklin Branch LOG OF TEST PIT TP-5 .n�.r., � •�nN„ King City, Oregon I �_ Juiy, 1980 0-196.01 FIG. 6 _W �Cr = STANDARD PENEIRATION BUIL UESCRIPTIOtI 13- aJ �� a, RESISTANCE 114ULB WH6Ht,30 DHOPI Lu ¢a w ♦ BLOWS(FITI bURFACI ELIV Approx. 178.5 ft N cr3 C3 yr Stiff, mottled brown and red-brown, fine __. sandy, slightly clayey SILT; damp, . • . occasional gravel and organic fragments (FILL). I T 2I Soft, dark gray brown, slightly organic SILT ; wet, trace fine roots. 3 T i . • Very stiff, mottled brown and gray-brown SILT to fine sandy SILT; damp, micaceous, 4E ; : p occasional 1 mm holes (root casts ?) . 5 Loose to medium dense, green to gray- G T green, very silty fine SAND; wet, trace I organic fragments and occasional thin 4 _.._. organic layers, grades locally to fine 7E P + sandy SILT. \ . T 81 I OT IIT :, . d► . . a . . Bottom of Boring .So Completed 8/2/80 - r Drilled by rotary rig with bentonite mud. t a LEGEND ?O 70"0D SPI.IT SPOON SAMPIF P SAMPIERPUSHFU IMPERVIOUS SEAL • WATERGONTENT 1%) T 0"OD IMIN WALL SAMP11 A111RHIRGLIM11S WAIIALEVEL FOR DATE SHOWN 110U1U l IMII mAS SAMPIF �NAtURA1 WATER PIEZOMPER 11P , * AMPLE NOT RICOVFRFO CONtINI PI ASTIC.LIMIT SttII UFSCRIPIIONS ANOIN11 F-1, IART INTIRPRITIVF ANOACILIAI CHANGI,MAY RI fHADUAI WAIFRh,VFI MAY VAHr WITH iIMI'Of YEAR Kelly/StrazeEAssociales: Benjamin Franklin Branch I LOG OF BORING — Gerart1I*Ld1( I,AhAJ11 King City, Oregon JULY, 1980 0-146.01 FIC. 7 s • 1 47f LZ ir H \1 j Uj _i4 v, r Q'• --} . ; WU 3 ' 4. I1NIDUM NWHIS Jo F'I Benjamin Franklin Branch CONSOLIDATION TEST Kelly/Strazer Associates, TP - I S-6 lA"ft trK Al CWUMAM King City, Oregon Jul 1980 0-196.01 FIG. 8 LL 1-17 a uj 3 z t—`— O I lL e rr z LL uj 1 7- cr - I =- 3 Z ICI i 1 I i w uj �I e m (1 N3:)H3d) NIVEIIS I d- I' rAssociatea Benjamin frankl �n Branch CONSOLIDATION TEST Kelly/Straw -[P-3, S-6 c,K.K►.#,�CurtmA.vw% King C i`y, 0 re yc n 7-8-$0 u 196.01 1=1G- 9 .o . . � GLA`lC't� =k-T Se,r� �l_a-►D�cs�.t�� .wr;�� ou�''f�) NOUL�- �MMAM :i C)� STivx.T�.�RR•%k. �uG�� DA..reM�u75, Sc.�P�$, ATL• PaU%"E xxr7 , :�-A-rt S r.,CH,J ceT wn�t-c1;�rwA�r To J -J LF �aR,p+�UIJ.CL R. G.!P1L4 o a o ��Y/U7�,tl�F I ,WpfAQr-D R- �.9u i�/� /`«�u r.�V G(�}►a�EL A Fr- ; II u yO " . vl.0P 2. '`o MA,iiJ'lAn 'S o Cr2�i7Gtr&A R" Fj{Gk�/p Ti ara PM-rm ro IV p r.j 2w t�6JIr P�`- -r.-Aow q (, 1-ID Ra f�2aor.►S adzf, To f5E CoNW6;C.Tv1 To 5JPyCQA"*l 5►- sT��'1/ ? T/�MP 4c.C, F ;�R- u� �Ac+ �U�. �,a,L I►� L Li PTS I^A s! pV.4C�P.s. CADHPP C-T To C15•!. AtTm P-(c:S eo N D fL Ir W 5/,ar65 oR PelE-Ad--JT Cop. tw,-iw) wv--y p�,e S. ,+ �Tu-re:D r-oP. i cd" G-�+/EI-• CP r Pee Llc, i P.'+�+•«i�.�.. w/ 'Ft ave w� 'S,a v.�p o cz. SA,..�p � <.��-A✓CL. _ f °>►" o. �- ��i rk U(.tA N A5 Ae�rrt c n GE M r a P r Kelly;StraierAssoc iales Benjamin Franklin Branch DRAIN AND BACKFILL DETAILS cw."et�na,ucu„r.v., King City, Oregon 17-8-80 0-146,01 FIG-10 Y ILI 1.1U1 1. cE rr� L:.2r►•7i r`t C-, Fr LA., A-T L.c AS'7 i SI ?,;Cqo. iL-.L-DL-4 n1 ES pa-I OA- TJ P2E Z ALF>c c�ois..r� FI L.4— A-r C-c sus:-T Sr r-r— r ` 4 r rJAr4 G,l2.n.LSC. ,I ``tG'rG o '��.fWu,hl4s /S.QE �..t�4-ICu1v.T1G�- P.Jor 'ro sc-C'-. Kelly/Strazer Associ.itf•- Benjamin Fr•ankl in Rrar,ch PRE-LOAD DETAILS King City, Oregon 1-8-80 0-196.01 FIG. 11 Cit' el 'King Cit' 15390 S.W. 1 16th Avenue Portland,Or"on 97223 March 27. 1980 Mr. Virgil Rohm c/o Benjamin Franklin Savings & Loan Assoo-iation 1 — S.I`. Columbia St. Portland, OR 9725a Be— Benjamin Franklin Proposed building. This letter is to affirm our teiephone conversation of 3/26/80. Your letter of 3/25/80 indicates mutual agreement with the several, stip— ulated concerns expressed in the approval of the conceptual plans we approved. 0 We appreciate your prompt response to otir concerns and can see no further reason for you not to proceed with the site plans, etc. for approval. As we discussed in our conversation, a complete set of structural plans is not needed until ,you submit them to our building official. The specifications as mentioned in your letter showing elevation, color of brick, trim color, and siting of probable signs and lighting, locations of sidewalks and roadways are all the comm— ittee acid the Council should need for approval. On receipt of the site plan. etc., we will ,make every effort to expedite your approval request through the ConL-iittee and the City Cowicil. The Council meets on the third Wednesday of each month L.S. Carroll / Mayor cc; Tualatin Development Co. Boles. Maguire N Koch Auiiding Official Architectural Review Committee FEDERAL SAVINGS AND L ❑ AN ASSOCIATION March 25, 1980 BLNJ FI�ANY OL PLAZA P9 ❑NL B.W.ON(UOlE80 MBIA ATlAN A. N 972SB Mr. L. S. Carroll , Mayor City of King City 15390 SW 116th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97223 Re: Benj . Franklin proposed Building Dear Mayor Carroll : I Enclosed for your reference is a copy of your letter to the Benj. Franklin dated February 20, 1980, wherein you specify certain concerns regarding our proposed building and site, and also a copy of a letter to the Benj . Franklin from Tualatin Development Company dated M?rch 18, 1980. We are most anxious to proceed with this project at an early date, and by this correspondence assure you that we commit to you, and the City of King City, our sincerest cooperation. We are, at this moment, prepared to authorize our Architects to proceed immediately to develop construction drawings and specifications. We do, however, feel that we need some assurance from you that our efforts and committments are constructive toward our objectives. Following is our response to the items of concern in your letter. In paragraph 4, we interpret this to mean elevation drawings including exterior specifications as tc brick veneer, trim color, and site plan. Hopefully, we would not be required to engage engineers for structural , mechanical , and electrical systems before the image of the building is approved. Paragraph 6. Item 1 . We agree that all construction activities will be "on site," aid that no on street parking will be allowed. It should be noted, however, that in the process of pouring the required concrete sidewalks, it is most likely that the concrete delivery will , of necessity, be from the street. aNIK�� h Page 2 Item 2. Please refer to the enclosed letter from T.D.C. Item 3. We see no problem here, and the plot plan clearly shows the storm water drainage as directed in your letter. Item 4. There will be no construction debris allowed on 116th during the course of construction. Item 5. Please refer to the letter from T.D.C. Item 6. Please refer to the letter from T.D.C. It is our understanding that the concept for the extra right turn lane would entail 116th to be widened, be- ginning at approximately the center of our build- ing. We will show this on our plot plan. It is evident that we have been in close communication with Tualatin De- velopment Company, and a mutual co-operation does exist. ' We are ho.)eful that these official committments address your concerns, and that frog•; these, you can give us reasonable assurance to proceed. Your earliest attention to these matters will be most appreciated. Sincerely, BENJ. FRANKLIN FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSN. Virgil Rohm Vice President & Manager Real Estate Department VR:kh enc. �w City of King city 15390 S.W. 116th Av*nue Portland,Orew 97223 February 20, 1980 Boles. Maguire & Hoch 319 S. W. Washington $t.. Portland, Oregon 972 "4 Benj. Franklin Savings & Loan iI`1 S. W. Columbia Portland, Oregon 97204 Re: Conceptual Plan for Benj. Franklin Savings & Loan BuLlding The conceptual plan for the Renj. Franklin Savings & Loar. Company in the King City Plaza area was presented to the City Council at the regular meeting February 20, 1980, "his conceptual plan had been considered by the Architectural P.evipw Committee first; on November h, 1979. Revisions were asked for at that time and a revised conceptual plan was again considered by the Architectural Review Comi.:ittee on January 24th, At this meeting the A.R.C. recommended Council approval if certain concerns were met. It is our understanding that at least some of `he concerns have been orally agreed upon. As it seems that time is an important factor to the developers, the Council agreed to consider the development in concept only. As final plans have not yet been prPEcnLed, Council action is limited at this time. The Council therefore at the reg<ilar meeting on February 20, 1980 voted to approve the conceptual plan as recommended by the Architectural Review Committee with the explicit condition that final plans must be submitted to and approved by the committee and the Council. As this land site is in an unplatted area of land owned by the 'Tualatin 71svelop- ment Company et al -- its development pones certain problems as it is to be owned by Pen,j. Franklin Savings & Loan. This means that. .ertain concerns re- frarding this development must be direr,- ed to Benj. Franklin CoL�pany rather than to usiial agreement with Tualatin Development Company Tt shcwld be recognized in the formulation of plans to build on this site that there are several concerns that will enter in the final plan approval . -2- February 20, 1980 1. Traffic obstru,.tion at this site during construction could be a serious prob.;.em with over 3100 vehicles including 90 buses per day passing the site on a narrow entranQe street. Construction plans should include an absolute No Parking of trucks - equipment - care - or other traffic obstructions on 116th beyond the property lines. Mutual agreement should be made with Tualatin Development Company for such use on open land. 2. Sanitary sewer connection to be made to the City system main should be through a mutual agreement with T. D. Company for alignment avoiding the intersection of Queen Elizabeth and 116th connection from Tebo's. 3. Storm drainage should be directed along the rear lot line directly to the connection of the storm sewer system at the creek as use of the street can cause flooding in the Plaza and at Royalty and Queen Elizabeth. Q. Dobris from construction along th 116th entrance can be a traffic hazard. The ccntractor should agree to keep this area clean at all times. 5. 7'ne sidewalK asked for b,y the Architectural Review Committee should be effected by mutua.. agreement, with the T. D. Company. The right turn lane discussed should be effected by ,nutual agreement with the T. D. Company. In summary we stress the importance of working closely with the Tualatin Development Company who own all the land surrounding this island site and whose co-operation will be essentim.l to meet our concerns with the develop- ment at this time of this land site. City of King City Council Mayor /rw ccs Roy Brown, Tualatin Development Co. Ed Walden, Building Of.fioial Tigard Building Department ELAN- CHECK REPORT BuildingL I T-v RR14- P e r m i t nnn Address Occupancy Building Type .A�_ Land Zone i'ioor area 9. 2 Other Total Area Allcwable Area Al-lowable increases Occupant Load B. ft. La --- sq. Ft./ occupant= 1 sq. rt. 00 00 sq. ft./ Occupant= 2 ft. 4 ------sq. ft./' occupant= I�f* Other Total. Load Value sq. ft. S Q. . ft.= ?OO Permi t 07 Plan Check /2-L, 2 4� 4% 70 Total, Sewer 0.U .c, P'Ai" 5 u r ch a r g e Insp. Fee Total Parking ----- Spaces (a 50. 00/space Comments :