Loading...
14665 SW 92ND AVENUE 1 14665 SW 92ND AVENUE 1 - '1 _ 1 1 �• hr� h -s 1� l � I 982 EDITION 301 Chapter 3 I �( PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS Permits Sec.,301,(a)Fernritv Required. It shall be unlawful tot-any Person, firm or J r corporation to erect, construct, enlarge, alar, repair, move, improve, remove, convert or demolish any building or structure regulated by this code, except as specified in Subsection(b)of this section.or cause the same to be dune without _ (J first obtaining a sepame,permit for each building or structure from the buildir4 ��y� official. EXCEPTION: It is not the purpose of this code to requi•e that permits be u( obtained or Ices be paid for repairs and maintenance which do not violate the intent of this code,when such repair or maintenance is doneon a single-family 4A residence, or a private garage, carport or storage shed that is accessory to a e sin single-family residence. V Items,designated as follows, in or appurtenant to single-family residences and which do not enuoach over subsurface disposal systems or into required U yards are exempt from permits and fees in this code: retrofitted insulation V_� 4,, ,4,4 +Je .�(h� meeting the requirements of Section 1712, 1713, 5202 and 5303 (a) and a .q[� which is blown or injected into closed wall cavities of existing residences; concrete slabs;driveways;sidewalks;masonry repair;porches;patio covers; painting;interior wall;floor or ceiling covering;nonbearing partitions;steely ing;cabinet work;gutters,downspouts;small accessory buildings not over 120 square feet or a height of 10 feel measured to the highest point; dour aril window ?Placements(where no structural members! changed. (see Section 104 (e), Fxceptionl; ic-placement or repair of siding not required to be fire resistant; and replacement or repair of roofing the weight of which does not exceed 30 percent of the required live load design capacity and is not required to be fire resistant,and plastic glazed storm windows.(ORS 456.915) i (t.)Eaempted%brk.A building permit will not be required for the followin f: I. Agricultura�buildings(see Appendix Chapter 111 2. Ft nces not over 6 feet high. 3. rnl derricks. 4. Movable cases,counters and partitions not over S feet high. S. Retaining walls which are not over 4 feet in height rne:tsurd from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall,unless supporting a surcharge or impourwing flammable liquids. 6. Nater tanks sup;)orted iir,ctly upon grade if the capacity does crit exceed 5000 gallons and the r,tio of height to diarrseter or width does not exceed two to one. 7 Platforms,walks and driveways not mote than 30 inches above grade and not over any basement or stc„y below. g. Painting,papering and similar finish work 9 Temporary nmition picture,television rind theater stage sets and scenery 10. Y,indow awnings supported by an exterior wall of Group k, Division 3. steel Grimp M Occupancies when projecting rxx more than 54 inches. 31 CITY OF TIGA0 CODE ENFORGEMLN I- ACTION REPORT LOCATI ON: TAX MAP: TAX LOT: NAME Of OWNER: ADDRESS OF OWNER: ACTION 1 AKEN: Letter Citation Phone Person Contact Site Visit (s) other OTHER COMMENTS: TYPE' 01' COMPLAINI , Business Tax Sign Noxious Vegetation Zoning Violation Open Storage of Junk Noise Filling (Sensitive Lands) Animals Abandoned Vechiles Others --'L UJw c�,rcA r COMPI.AINT: DATE: ___—__-- ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER Referred to PLANNING ENGINEERING OPERAtIONS DATE: Caw Opened: rasp Closed A i I r 4t t iK WPJNICIPAL CODE VIOLATION NOTICE ISSUE TO: �ADO 1— S l r• (,c(cer / ADDRESS: _ CITYC �IT'IARD TELEPHONENO.: �J 6 DATE: - VIOLATION OF TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE-CHAPTER_!�/-- SECTION(S): Q� TITLE DEALING WITH:. v IS <✓1Gl C 16&CCj h Ce f V �C�la NATURE OFVIOLATION: � �6T� 1 k U e (4-UL U 15 u, ( C I f^r av i po 011K' C_�� �- �t I UCt. �C' V�C'c3'�• ��Y r Il�'C.���J � I U 1 Rt CL kcL r%t 1-1 c e� Q 14`7 LOCATION OF VIOLATION: a SPECIFIED TIME FOR VIOLATION CORRECTION: THIS IS A W A R N I N G !! IF THIS VIOLATION IS NOT CORRECTED WITHIN THE TIME SPECIFIIED ABOVE_. THE CITY WILL INITIATE LEGAL ACTION. REMARKS:- C) ✓6Z ) `" -- - 1 . PRESENTED TO: -1141 - BY: r CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 12755 SW ASH AVENUE, TIGARD,OREGON 97223 (503-839-0171) WHITE: BUILDING DEPARTMENT YELLOW: RECIPIENT PINK FILE July 23, 1985 Dan Blanchard Code Enforcement Officer City of Tigard Dear Dan: This letter is in reply to your letter dated June 24, 1985 and our subsequent conversation at your office on July 1 , 1985 and your request for a chronological listing of the fence and boundary line in question. As you will recall from our conversation, there is an elevation difference of over 2-1 feet from Belknap's property down to mine in the rear yard and along the side yard tapering to meet at the street. Here then is the chronology of the fence line as recalled by myself, my mother (former owner) and witnesses present through the years. 1967 - Belknaps construct fence from boundary to corner of their house. The fence is set in 10" - 12" north into Belknaps property. 1970 - Bill Stricker constructs fence along same fence line to corner of Stricker house. Summer 1976 - Bought house from my parents. Unaware that fence did not straddle the property line as it normally would. Spring 1982 - Belknaps retaining wall (for sidewalk along south side of their house) leaned south enough to push existing fence over. I went to Hamilton Belknap and discussed problem. I informed and showed Hamilton how his retaining wall was improperly anchored and constructed. I offered to rebuild retraining wall and construct new fence on retaining wall . I would do the work and we, as neighbors, would split the cost of materials. He refused any part of it complaining of a bad back and an empty pocket book. Consequently, I paid for and constructed a new fenCEI (materials $500.00) . Cut I moved the fence line from the existing boundary line 8" - 10" south (into riy property, I thought) to allow room for future work on Belknaps retaining wall . 3ecause of the elevation dirference and because the fence could not be properly installed atop a good retaining wall , it was necessary to extend height from my elevation up 8 feet tall to secure 6 feet of coverage at best and less then that in some places. After construction of new fence, I went back to Hamilton Belknap and informed him of the new fence and the fact that I moved it 8" - 10" south into my property. I also told him (Hamilton Belknap) that I moved the fence to allow him the space to have a good functional retaining wall constructed. I showed him how, unless corrected, their retaining wall would continue to deteriorate and would (in a few years) lean far enough south to begin pushing over the new fence. Hamilton told me at that time he would have it fixed. Summer 1983 - The retaining wall for Belknaps sidewalk is now leaning way over nearly touching the new fence. I go to Belknaps and again ask that they do something about the wall . They say they will . Summer 1984 - The retaining wall for Belknaps sidewalk has leaned far enough to begin pushing the fence over. I plead with Belknaps to fix it. I show them what is happening. They complain of bad back, bad heart and empty pocket book. Spring 1985 - My fence is leaning at a 450 angle into my yard with the retaining wall steadily pushing it over. I go back to Belknaps. This time I talk to both Barbara and Hamilton. We discuss the problem. They complain of bad back, bad heart and empty pocket book. I offer to remove the retaining wall for them. Hamilton replys, "Oh, would you please? I would really appreciate that. " I agrie to. So I removed the railroad ties myself and then I re-straighten my fence and re-concrete the posts in an upright pos 'ion. I inform the Belknaps that the sidewalk will still need a properly installed retaining wall to stop any further erosion. Late Spring, 1985 - I add another ?0 feet of fence along the north boundary line (in line witn existing fence) for firew-,od storage. (Materials $300.00) . Summer 1Q85 - Barbara Belknap comes unglued. She tells me that the fence is on her property and she wants it moved. She tells me the shrubs in front are on her property and she wants them moved. She tells me the fence is not legal height and she is going to call the city. She tells me I am financially responsible for the retaining wall , because I came on her property and took out what was left. She has the city surveyors come out, then she has the city inspector out, then two more teams of surveyors come out. The original boundary pins and markets are found and/or established. The fence face is even with the west pin and the fence straddles the line at the east pin. The snrubs are mostly all on Vie line exactly or completely on my property. Enclosed is my drawing, not to good, but I think you can see what I mean. July 6, 1985 - Barbara Belknap informs me that she was told the fence is now hers. It is not intended here. to say that I have not made a couple errors in this continuing saga - one bring - through ignorance of the law - not getting a proper permit back in 1982 for an over-height fence. Another error was not being better informed as to the fence line which stood for 12 - 15 years in one place and its relationship to the original property markers. And I am more than willing to pay now for the permit and any penalty you may feel is just. But I think we could both agree that the biggest mistake I made was buying a piece of property next to Barbara and Hamilton Belknap. Thanks Dan, and please keep me informed of any action I need to take to resolve this s tuation. Sincere , Dan Stricker y z3 \ fen" �wrt 1 Y '(4N sJ. w a J-1 l o I .� i Po,,1c- ire / L .(T7L� , .� Site,$&MOO -low ISI �o�Gov w•�/ �►►� WA C11 'w+uct�- 6 �1 G ra N N a>1�10� v � �- o ' x, 4 N O O Cl] U Ln L �.Ln . m r- CD rn r (v r 'O L b r_ V C ro m C ro Q C +J Q N (\I f� Ol C N S 6` Q1 l) O L N i-� ti N Ln L C �D p1 CD � E TO WHOM IT MAX CONCERN: I was asked to write why I feel this permit should not be granted at the present time. When we moved into our home almost 20 years ago, we enclosed our back yard on til three sides with a six foot fence, which was set in one foot, allowing plenty of room for maintanence. When Dan Str.icker took over his property from his parents, he came over one day saying the fence along that side was his. A neighbor was there at the time and verified that my husband had put up the fence. Later on we had the fence removed except for one section. When we had repairman out to repair the fence and install railroad ties, he said they could not work from his yard and again said the fence was his. Several years ago, he removed OUR fence and put the present one up which is six to eight feet in height. In January, he again came over and said that our railroad ties were against his fence. He t^ld my husband that if he did not remove the ties that he was going to. My husband h , a heart condition and cannot do heavy lifting so told him to take out the one that was against the fence. While my hurband and I were gone, hu removed the ties in pieces, bent al.l. the metal stakes and dug all the dirt out back to our sidewalk. I told Dan they that I dial not want any more of the dirt removed and to leave the rest of the ties in place. Because of the dispute over the fence and property lire, we had OUT p -operty surveyed by Burton Thomas of Tigard and new stakes were put in. As you can see, the present fence is on our property, we cannot use our patio, our sidewalk ..as cracked, the survey cost us $225.00, and the present estimate to replace the ties will be $850.00, which does not in elude repairs to the cracked sidewalk. About a month ago, Mr. Stricker again removed more railroad ties, all the dirt and rock along the front section of the yard and added II another section of fence which extends beyond the front of our house, and is 8 ft. tall. He did not have our permission to remove any part of the railroad ties, dirt, or rock. We had cleared this section last winter to park our camper. At the present time, our camper is parked in McMinnville since there 'is no longer room to park it off the street. Along the front Mr. Str.icker planted shrubs that are on our side of the property line and extended the barkdust of: least another foot over. These shurbs are also 8 foot tall and obstruct our view of the street and it is dangerous with the trzf.fic on 92nd street and the children playing in the neighborhood. Since the Code restrictions for. Tigard is for 6 Ft. fences, I feel that the permit .:or the A Ft. fence should not be granted. I also feel that the fence that is now standing should be moved to Mr. Strickers property, and the shrubs should be cut back to no more than 30 inches. Mr. Stricker informed me that the only way this would be done was for us to contact an attorney and take him to court. He said since the fence was already standing that the property was now his. If this is true, 1 feel that our codes, laws, and rstrictions are very unfair. I thought property lines were made, and laws were to follow, and cr:es were to stay within the limits. If any more information is needed, we can be reached at I 639-4466. Thank you for taking the time to read our objections to the permit. /e/6�_ ctt,� CrZC�✓ i«u(� Sincerely• .A,��-t,.r ,,' 'Y-�i��y✓� �/^�!�� Hamilto R. Belknap Barbara J. Belknap l�r' 1+r teat 14635 SW 92nd St. Tigard, Oregon, 97224 6,4 ,Co 7-S6 I fd /�? , I i 1273,34' M 0 o 6© 0.03 Fence Encroachment I , (Sea' oetai/ oe%w) / O a > i I 1 `,V / FENCE ENCROACNMEAtr DE rA/L NOscALe /lOGISE b C NaeF zo'F. "` I./°.t o,Cq, 3z. 28 �F-N�'E. /S 4",LV/OE � (/�14/FS/I✓N�/l��lT 8`�' \` (p 250 � I(1 7�'go�-4, G�ie�c,-� 9 7223 .gUra- ,e, y G,o4a �rioose o�S./i'vey /s �o �f�,b,%Sfl ry f :t C7o1%'G"' 7,6r 0007 c1170/'0/Ol, /Z/Ezzq tea'os/hod ono a� orir�g oraez vey X reed ua llh j Ye//a e �5 fic��OP �i�.scri,b�s - - --- -- REG1STIERE PROFE SSIIONAL �or�h LAND SURVEYOR 4 � p ?R E THOMAS H. BURTON I W. P/NEBROOK -u 7�jCs, �l C� i V �- r CITYOF TI1FAM June 24, 1985 WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON Daniel Stricker 14665 SW 92nd Tigard, Oregon 91223 RF: Building with out Permit "lease be advised that the Gtty of Tigard has received a report that a fence erected on your property may be in violation of. City Codes. Tigard Code Section 18. 100.090(b)(3) deals with Fences in a Gide yard. You appear to be responsible for a code violation, which is occuring at 14665 SW 92nd. For your information the applicable code provision, 18.100.090 setbacks for fences or walls, reads as follows: (b) Fences or Wall : (3) Located in a side or rear yard and which exceed six feet in height shall be subject to building permit approval. In addition, the State of Oregon Structural Specialty Code and Fire and Life Safety Regulations, ,nforced by the City of Tigard provides that any fences over six feet ii height require a permit under section I Please ,!e the attached sections 301 (a) and (b)(2). Your attention to this matter is greatly appreciated. Failure to comply with the code provisions could result in issuance of a citation. Sincerely, -KA, t y lit,J Dan Blanchard Code Enforcement Officer City of Tigard (DB:cz/0460P) �— 12755 S W ASH PO BOX 23397 TIGARD.OREGON 97223 PH 839-4171 --•--.-..__ CITY OF TIGARD r� f Code Enforcement Act' n RegUC S t- Complainant: ►� Address: 3<' — � l ,-mil Phone No. : <<�•jr - •, , Date Received: Z.77S Complaint : Hus Tax Open Storage of Junk —_- _Noxious Veg. Noise Hazard Dog (Animal) Sign Filling (Sesitive Lands) +Other C Explanation: _ Location: 1a - ---- Tax Map: Tax Lot: ?T / Action: ----L r \ 4, 41 .y �+ C Cod e 01 1 i c i e r t w s �■► a Ago V a►0� J � If>t IN rw RNMMM ,ww+rnww.....-._...»�.,�....-..s+c,a.R'.�"�y^,wTnv.n^.v.'n'ww^MVYr'rMrAl.gl- - ....Aq�rv........_........-,...w..+,.rw,,.v:.r,�•wwt...F.ill✓M1O4K:.r....L'1'Y:V,w.'M'i,l•;.vw..... BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 11T TIGARD DATE li-29 7 19 ' 4 THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR APERMIT FOR THE WORK HEREIN INDICATED 13UILDERPHON ' ti 9 OR AS SHOWN AND APPROVED IN THE ACCOMPANYING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. OWNER PHONE � — LOT NO. OWNER CIL', & Mra IjU1 E?hitY JOB ADDRESS i r. 1 J4) 92nd HOME ADDRESS ARCHITECT We ENGINEER BUILDER ADDRESS DESIGNER STRUCTURE ❑NEW ❑REMODEL LADDITION ❑REPAIR ❑RENEWAL ❑FIRE DAMAGE ❑DEMOIATION O RESIDENCE ❑COMM ❑EDUCATIONAL ❑GOV'T ❑RELIGIOUS❑PATIO ❑CAR PORT ❑GARAGE ❑STORAGE❑SLAB [-]FENCE ❑BOND ❑MOVING ❑CONDITIONAL USE ❑DESIGN REVIEW ❑COUNCIL_APPROVED C.USIGNS — OCCUPANCY___-. __-LAND U3E ZONE_I1-7 BLDG.TYPE aN FIRE ZONE PLAN CHECK BYHEAT_ —_.—_ bldg. I bad, acim i britt -- -- — 270 OCG.LQAJ� F.l SJ9B_LQ9�_-__-_-__._HELGH7 __-_. _ -_JyQ�. 4HlE --- AREA NO_ BUILDING DEPARTMENTSET BACKS FRONT REAR LEFT SIDE RIGHT SIDE Permit 3b.0 0 --- —�.-- ---, —THIS PERMIT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN THE BUILDING CODE, 70NING Plan Check 1b.C10 REGULATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES, AND IT IS HEREBY AGREED ThAT THE - WORK WILL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH Sub-total i4.L,)Q ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES. TI4E ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES N^Y WAIVE - RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS. CONTRACTOR AND SUB CONTRACTORS TO HAVE CURRENT CITY BUSINESS State Tax 1,44 LICENSE, SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR SEWER, PLUMBING AND HEATING. Total By - - nr�pi iWANT on Acer�i-- --_ --------- - - Approved JAW Rrvuelpt No At—mPF 55 SHONE ..rn4.riYWYd..wl�4fi�..,WM.r�.IW:_r. _ .a1i�uVMN,,—- . _•. • •t.. VWpYr/bwaM:li.M�YIYI�+�I1.'� ,L.,�:.Y..0 l.�«.. _ —_a. ....w.�LLw S UATE INSP. TYPE INSPECTION REMARKS PLUMBING DATE r s -T l l -zcj- u t nn Contractor 9 3i o% Permit No. /2-4/y IL Rough-in Fixture -- Final _ HEATING Contractor Permit No. Gas or Oil _ Rou ti•in -- Final _ SEWER Final -- D9IVEWAY Final Sto�r.i Drainage (Rain Drain) Final Sidewalk Curb&Street Final — BLDG DEPT. FINAL TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OCCUPANCY Approach CERTIFICATE OCCUPANCY Final ( Landscaping r C. Zoning Final `.. i - JILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONLIT'Y TIC.".RD UATE � = 7-?- NA UNDERSIGNED E"_REBY APPLIES FOR APERMIT FOR THE WORK HEREIN INDICATED BUILDER PHONE AS SHOWN AND APPROVED IN -THE ACCOMPANYING PLANS AND SPECIE ICAI IONS. OWNER PHONE LOT NO. —. JUB ADDRESS �rQsw � HOME ADDRESS � — ARCHITECT ENGINEER DESIGNER L7II W TO REMODEL ADDITION ❑REPAIR TORENEWAL OF IRE DAMAGE ---❑DFMOLITION - �- ---- -1 ---- Y DENCE LJCEIMM ❑EDUCATIONAL ❑GOV'T ❑RELIGIOUSDPATIO OCARPORT OGARAGE [:]STORAGE OSLA13 ❑FENCE -IH'-IND - _0 MOVING ❑CONDITIONAL USE ❑DLSIGN REVIEW ❑COUNCIL APPROVED ❑SIGNS-� CPA NCY� L ANO USE 70NE-!1:j]= _BLDG.TYPE —K -FIRE ZONE PLAN CHECK BY_ F14S�A.1Q9� �/_ _ rT� /_—JL4.:SIQRIF�S- -.._AREA�7�_N4.bDH4S�_M� YALUE _�dv -BUILDING UEPARTMENT SET BACKS FRONT REAR —LEFT SIDE RIGHT SIDE_ _ - t I m I t -- — �v —-- IHIS PF RMI f IS ISD SUESUBJECT TO THE RF(IULATIONS CONTAINED IN THE BUILDING CODE, 70NING !'len Check -p 91) REGULATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES. AND Il IS HEREBY AGREED THAT THE - -- WORK WILL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WIIH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH I �:ULI total ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES. THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT WAIVE -- -- — RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS. CONTRACTOR AND SUB CONTRACTORS TO HAVE CURRENT CITY RI.AINESS tate Tax - f LICENSE SEPARATE PERMITS REOUIRFD FOR SFWE.R, PLUMBING AND HEATING. by APPL ICANT OR AGENT rd CJ�� ecelpt No. yls�........+tirv��r+rwr+r�.a...�..M..:..,N,..�............,.M,Mir+»TS*`Mw«<r.o...^nv..,,,,.,w-«....,,,.rwr,-,.np.ow,+oe+-r..+..�....v.. •...er.... r�s....,,.win...«+fir«.,-«.. -.n, CITY or BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION TIG ARD DATE_ ` ' 19 N° 0655 THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR APERMIT FOR THE WORK HEREIN INDICATED OR AS SHOWN AND APPROVED IN THE ACCOMPANYING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. OWNER PHONE _ OWNER �. J/ �'ifr� yr.. ADDRESS_ BUILDER PHONE �� 'f f�� �. ENGINEER HUI LDER A_R_CHITECT _ _DESI_G VER STRUCTURE ❑NEW REMODEL ADDITION ❑REPAIR ❑RENEWAL ❑FIRE DAMAGE ❑DEMOLITION RESIDENCE ❑COMM ❑EDUCATIONAL ❑GOV'T ❑RELIGIOUS❑PATIO_❑CARPORT ❑GARAGE ❑STORAGE❑SLAB [— ]FENCE ❑BOND ❑MOVING ❑CONDITIONAL USE ❑DESIGN REVIEW ❑COUNCIL APPROVScD ❑SIGNS OCCUPANCY " _LAND USE ZONE BLDG TYPE— FIRE ZONE_') PLAN CHECK BYHEAT _ - CC LOAD FLOOR LOAD HEIGHT 1 4'4 ------- _ NO.STORIES_— AREA _VALUE BUILDING DEPARTMENT SET BACKS FRONT REARLEFT SIDE RIGHT SIDE Permit ..z /9 --_ - — -- -- THIS PERMIT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN THE BUILDING CODE, ZONING Plan Check REGULATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES, AND IT IS HEREBY AGREED THAT THE WORK WILL.BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH Recording ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND OROINA'/CES. THE ISSUANCE JF TI+IS PERMIT DOES NOT WAIVE RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS. CONTRACTOIT AND SUB CONTRACTORS TO HAVE CURRENT CITY BUSINESS 1%State / LICENSE. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR SEWER, PLUMBING AND HEATING. Total BY �'�/ nF,pl.lrn Approved rvr <iri Aoerur — — F i r Receipt No e !w.�.u.kr,tv.s . t_O , _...____ .....W..._. _...._W, . . _ ..y......._.. noI'RFss� --— P110NIF -- IF w V7_q WA DATE INSP. TYPE INSPECTION REMARKS PLUMING DATE yJ/-7 Contracto i - 6f 'Z7- yPermit No. 7 -� �-A °` /C-1.3•J Rough-in Vis.. Fixture �P Final HEATING Contractor Permit No. Gas or Oil Rough-in Final _ — SEWER Final DRIVEWAY -- — Final -" ---- -- Storm Drainage — (Rain Drain) Final _ Sidewalk --— Curb &Street Final BLDG.DEPT. FINAL —_TEMPORARY rA broachCERTIFICATE OCCUPANCY CERTIFICATE OCCUPANCYalndscaping ning Final