Loading...
11767 SW 91ST AVENUE ADDRESS: 1.17 9/VA� e� R H Vl J G] L7 W J 1:lreoordslmicrotlm\tarr, Abul a og rioc PILO, Grix`t a 1611wYR+.44i�.-ww,(M.`►�^4..MOw'I�rF..W� ,t•. .r ,. �tii+ir�l,.i' _......�--. ____._� � 7M♦ �1.; / •� 1 t� It Cl. Lr b a l c r Cd to u o16 a ► ,► C3 C3 4, U t ►� ' N v o .� to to 0 w t:. rL l F. °° t� �✓ (T { to t,! cs E . U .. d oa O V U w � , h T MCI y .-�'-S"-`F�''�/'�-yam.-'--'_'.:-: .-..^,y s 1 �.��r-]�- -'� f`�"�r�,...f`�./�/�:?• �I L CiT1f OF TIGARD June 24, 1986 ` OREGON 25 MKn a SWWcr f01S1•M6 Paul and Sharon Dahl 9495 SW New Forept Drive Beaverton, OR 97005 RLQ: 11665 SW Creenburg Rd (WCTM lSl 35DC Ta: Lot 2600) Dear Ar. i Mrs. Dahl ! Th;s In to inform you that your door �•^'_ _- t-4t-lon (Nis ' •011 -line, 19P5 Ll cue .,Ly of Tigard to the rucceseful fulfillment of elsvun conditions. All conditions were to have been met prior to reco atlon r tai Washington County. In short, these conditions included half-street Improvements along SW Creenburg and SW 91st Avenue frontage, construction of public teprovements, dedication of right--of-vay alon,l both street frontages, and a joint use maintenance agreement for the dr:vevay. Plans and plea_ profiles for these conditions were to have been subeiitted. Therefore, the three lots constitute a zoning violation. No building permits will be Issued for any of these properties until the cc,nditions of approval have bern met. Please contact Reith Liden or myself so we may work to resolve this problem. Thant you for your cooperation. Sincerely, 4,411 � '1'41e��_ Deoborah A. Stuart 4LS:be101 +:1125 SW NaQ BNd.PO.9m 23397,TNXxd Oregon 97223 (503)639.4171 — r t September S, 1986 C11YOFT1VARW OREGON � 25 vows LW Sen*c.1e / 1961.1986 Paul Dahl 9495 SM New Portat Drive Beaverton, OR 97005 RE: Minor Land Partition HLP 7-85 Dear Mr. Dahl: The partitioning of your p.:operty loc, t-• .;;: the southwest corner of Creenburg Rond and 91st Avenue into three parcels of 0.27, 0.19, and 0.14 acres was approved by the City subject to conditions. Attached is a copy of the Planning Director's decision. Nhs!n thn new qx rar•afy,,d Al,^ti. th! 711". runinK 1"O'AtiOn waa An,,* ' 'd 1,"r^ itl' All rf 'U�sn of approval had been satisfies. In addition, a minor error was in the rendition 1 because the usual procedure is to require compliance prior tc recording the partition rather then issuance of building permits as stated. As I ind!csted to you on the phone earlier, th,r City will honor tie terse of the decision As mitten and the toning violation hao been removed. To date, Ccaditians 7, 8, and 10 have been satisfied The City will require compliance with Conditions 1, 2, 3, 4, S, 6, and 9 prior to the issuance of any Building Peraits on any of the three parceis. Street improvement obligations include the frontage of all three parcels. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have Any questions or need further information, please contact ■e. Sincerely, W� ° .. Koi:h S. Liden Senior Plnn,.er M c: Deborah Stuart Bldg. Insp. Engineering 152/dj 13125 SW 431;P-Nd_PO Box 21307,Tigard Oregon 97223 (503)63P-4171 ---- UA CE: June il, 1986 TO: Bui1jing Department, Randy Clarno, MLP 7-86 file,. Strect AJdress file FROM: Uebc.rah Stuart , Assistant Planner RF.: Zonine 'JiAaii.on at 11665 SW Creenb.,rg Road WCTM ISI 35tH: lot 1600 It has coo* to my attention that %everal of the conditions required as part of the June , 1985 approval granted ter a partition a' 11665 SW Greenburx Road were never completed. In addition, the property owners proceeded to 1 :n Zour.ly .VC i t our !'nal review. Therefore, nleasl• ,Jo not issue 1-irrher building, permits for this ptcpe:ty. Once our computer system is ope: tting, I will be able to record such violations in the data base and not via mecmos. he nurK) '""'"tinea OffIrp notes that all alets shulrid have access to sanitary sewar. ANAI YSIS ANO CON':I 11'_TON the proptsed division is consistent with the applicable standards ir, ttr- Comnunity Development Code for minimum lot minimum lot width ( sire ((5,000 square feet), be ogled that5U feet), building setbacks, and access. It should the flay lot with access to Grn.vibury Road will requires a IO foot side yard setback as provided in Section 18 96 ^,9t, of the Community Development Code. Ihp are alsallr�wable building heights (.on }lag lots o limited under certain circumstances according to section 18.98,030 of the Code (copy enclosed) . DECI`tic)N The P1Nnning Oirectur approves Mtp I-85 subject f trthenllOwir►y conditions; the 1 • UNl E:SS 01HI RWISE NOUD, AL1 COND11 ION; SI1Al1 OC Mrl pRIOR to ISSIIANC17 of 911F1-DING PERMITS 1. Standard halt- street improvements including sld .w',I :trpotIights, driv"wav apronsst , orm drwinaae arycurbs,"• . , . � . iris i.a: ,,6 ..;,..y the• ^ rrc , n ;'—: : ,�.,h��VplOQnl- J I"a; ,err• Said w "rue► ►'Uu g Read shall be but it. to major collector standards . Said improvempnts shall be dpiignad to eventually match bath vprt1cally fanrJ horizontally, improvements in �"ont of Barbpc• Court Subdivision. •standard half strpet improvements inr.ludirrg sidewalks, r.urbs, streetlights, driveway aprons, storm drbinage and utiIItIas sh,.11 be installed along the S W. - 1st Avenue frontage Said lmproveme its dlur'g S W standards . 91st Avenue shrille be built to local street. Seven (7) sets o" plan prr,filp public imprrwpment corrst►urtiron plans and One (1) itpmiied construr.tion cost pstimdte, stdmpl.d by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all pruFx,std Public improvements shall by for approval suLmittpd to the Enyineerirxl ^,action `,anitary sewer plan profile details shall be T -uvided as part of the public improvement plans. construction of .. l l 1 of t.pr t h.. vvemerit plans. the Sect inn will require prpatirng ofaf 11w)t Performance Bund, the payment Of a permit fop drK1 a sign installation/streetlight flop Also, the execution of d street opening permil or construction compliance agreement shall Occur prior to, or conrurrentiy with the issuance of ;approved public improvpment plans, SEF_ THE ENCLOSED HANDOUT GIVING MORE;SpECI_FIC INFORMATION REGARDING FEE SCHEDUI�ES� 00NDINC AND AGREf.MENT5 DECISION - MLP 1-85 - PAGE 2 \sw •;i06e . Fir 8G Relecu}t P•wtr pelt %Ott. bl�hrna Si,lc:•calk. _ : .^.. . � � w, ' I•+ft•11 e�•b1 eide+�•lkr •' � Scwle 1 1"-30' drivtwwy3l wiJen tlrset 1 janu.ary 221 1987 1 1 j PARGeL/PA lqc a L III Q i � 1 1'7� Itewar satan�Ln1-�,+\� r � � 1 PARceL 'j �• � ' r •- ` 1 rI ♦t.wi�.ry 1avlf.r f�.rvitL ��/�ie� .�rAin -J ( � I , I: ;,pre - " 1 01 r 3, I Ew1a..d 12"�11•rm !•war � � 1 i�♦1.11 �w4c,1. ba.•in. —�•- 1 Ertand �' f�•��••y stwarl 1 ' in��all ...�nE+•11C 4 4" larvICe :... . ,..,.�. �......, .rt. �wd►►1.. ? G'QU !I��p �j'iRl,L1T IMPROV6M&NTg