Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
12616 SW PATHFINDER COURT
12blo- SW PATHFINDER COURT a H rS a En J_ I� J weler a� ■r . _...ilYYrr.+�... -.....rM.wr.r«+ .,- w._ . -....•w..rw..rtl►orwrr««..•� ..�...�....... -- r..�.�.w,.... -.�. «..�.�...L. ..r ...... .�-...rr.+rr..�... GirfOF TIGARD i WASHINGTON'COUNTY,OREGON June 3, 1981 Doug Pollock 8222 N. Montana Portland, Oregon 97217 RE. : Driveway at 1261:1 SW Pathfinder Court Dear Sir: This letter is to confirm the City of Tigard' s approval of thz dri.v9way at above address, constructed in accordance with the engineer ' s specs. (see attached) It is recommended that only private passenger vehicleF be parked upon it. Sincerely, Brad Roast Building InspeEtnr BR/rel Encl . ------ — 124,A S.W MAIN P.O. BOX 23397 TIGARD, OREGON 97223 PH: 639-4171 _f. y. 1• .�i r„q. '11� f 'J✓"c' `.' y 77561, r�,w x' .rA c J a +w is t �'4: lG: jot" AM f� ��.�.ql. �1� �1111�/♦� � '� -1�3`' �i1�..,��i4s>��.!� � 'Ltij`a. •"!f -�"` '',;;i' ;','�} /^��.,�'' �(,"'1 Q"tom• + tR�'`� , �+ *Yi,�'" ,-1.- „►-,`+` ,t ;-L"'�./ - i s �� :►.'�f. `'..i \(� a� •A ` ''�' cam-�>.•�' ,�;`l �"y, ''�A •{ ` �. OF, oce CITY OF TIG" ARD r_. . SIz OREGON r r Owner: John Waterbury Permit No. 3261 Address: 8222 N Montana Portland 12615 SW Pathfinder Building Address:__ -- ' 4 ".� Occupancy: R-3 Land Use Zone: R-7 Bldg.Type_Fire Zone:_ P Y tisp,� Comments: < +� %'=,jVim � f May is hereby given this 14th as o 19 el 3 • � that said building may be occupied and that it � �,i �•� complies with all requirements of the Build- r-• / Al � r ing Code for the City of Tigard, as approved r s N � by the Tigard City C-,uncil. ui ding Inspector K�f Building Official ' W4s , tiAz r.: - Post Certificate in Conspicuous Place :1 ' " 1)E !°z � . � yTy � .. �� �-�'� ,�r�t � 4r�v�/� 4 ��/ 4 • � . .. � y � ��� �-Y �� fit, AV 1 .�?' ,, ,.��.'d`►,.� ;? pX°t,�,;, Y -^ai' , ,.;-a�'i ' ''�1 `.�.w Y= .• 'rr ,`,i. •V:." ' ' •�,r'�* r-"'"r '�-i ,: "�i; ``' '�,'� ,y'�►-y �,`...1a,.w... .*Y •�-. ..-rpSti.$_�::,s .�`.. v.��....+,�� ✓\-L,�•mes��� •..,,,..,,,.�• _ � .... •h-'V'e rte.. - s9'�+ ..,,yr.` .o..,a.•�� i� �w J-2 ea 1 IRVIN A. COOPER CIVIL ENGINEER December 24, 1980 O►►Ic[ 21.274123 WILLAMRTTC BUILDING Rtmnitnto- OREOON '^NTL.AND.O R[G ON 07204 WASHINGTON Rre. ..'a 3453 BUILDING DIVISION City of Tigard 12420 S.W. vlc,in Tigard , OR 97223 A ttn. : Brad Rce"t Re: Doug POLLOCK Yolo Estates Lots 5 6 6, S.W . PathF.inder Ct. #112595 6 #1126`16 Suhjer_t: Record of PILES DRIVEN For Foundation support of both Aegidenced. Presure-Creasats-Treated Class "©" Fir Plies. Orivan: .July 8 S 9 by Colgrove Contractors , Inc. Equipment: 40004 Urop-Hemmer w/5 Ft. Fall. Penetration Resistance: Mire. 10 blows per last foot. Friction Bearing [Per ENR) 32,SOO Lbs. (16 Tons). Lot 5 - x12595 S. W. Pathfinder Ct. RESIDENCE : 30' x 36' Plan Dimensions 12 Piles driven: Three trn nsver3e rows of 4 piles Original pile lengths delivered: 2B Feet. Pil" cap bnwms Q 4 Ft. above ground Line!. Average piles cut-ofF 5 Feet. AVERAGE FENETRATIrjN: 19 feet, each attaining over 113 Tons load capacity. Lot 6 - n12616 S.W. Pathfinder Ct. aESirENCE: 30' x 34' Plan Oimengions w; th pile-suppori:ed driveway ramp. 13 Piles dr-l-,en: Three transverse rows of 3 piles;; 4 piles on bark slope W driveway. Original Dile lengths delivar�-2d: 9 J 28 Ft. ; 4 tO 36 rt. Page 1 STRUCTURAL AAMMA APPRAISALS FOUNDATION Sn![. fNSPRCTIONS SURV YS fNVESTIGATIONS Pile cup beams 9 3'h 6 4X Ft. above ground line. Average pile cut-ofF 4 Feet L residence. Driveway ramp: 12" cut-oi-F. AVERAGE PENETRATION: 18 i=eet, each attaining over 15 Tons load capacity. Note: Piles dri\,en on sloping bank [FILL] at Driveway Ramp: Lower 2 9 Pile cap boom @ 11 Ft, above ground. Penetration: 24 Feet Upper E @ Pile cap beam 9 4% ft. above ground. Penetration: 30X FeeL. SUMMARY Exi•3ting creek at rear ^ector of both properties is a small tr;butary of FANNO CREEK. FLOOD PLAIN elevation 162.0 feeto determined by W. Caswell 6 R. A. Aright Engineering. Ground elr'vatlon beneatK both structures in range of 163 - 164 Feet; lower floor elevation 166 Feet #12595; 168 Feet U #12616. IA%C :cc ` I. A. Cooper c. c. : 1 Consulting Engineer Soils - Foundation Page 2 of 2 BUILDING PERMITAPPLICATIFO 1"�TIGARD DATE__ 19 60 326.E THE l�tiCCraIGNEIJ HEREBY APPLIES A P. mll FOR THE 1NORK HEPEIN INPICATED BUILDER PHONE ..263 OR AS SHOWN AND APPROVED IN THE A NYING Pt ANS AND S"ECIFICATIONS. OWNER PHONE LOT NO. )WNER .I0111`t 'Waterbury JOCADDR S l PsAnf,i.t'�t!er ARCHITECT �— - ENGINEER bunton Engin. BUILDEP c>aine ADDRESS :t N. Montane STRUCTURE i 13 NEW ❑ REMODEL ❑ ADDITION ❑ REPAIR rRENEWAL ❑ FIRE DAMAGE _❑ DEMOLITION {RESIDENCE U COMM 1-1 EDUCATIONAL ❑ GOV'T ❑-RELIGIOUS ❑ PATIO f_; CARPORT Ci GARAGE (_: S''CRASE ❑ SLAB❑ FENCE OCCUPANCY_ It'a_LAND USE ZONE R BLDG.TYPE FIRE ZONEPLAN CHECK BY _' HEA- 7, ' itruc:t single farm].__ dwelling_ w/attarhee gsrays. 3 89dr-00M - :3 beth. SEWERPERMITN 219Ljo •- 70 .Ol] — grsgs ant? sq.ft._..� UCC.LOAD FLOOR LOAD A HEIGHT 22 NO.STOHIF.S� 2 _ AREA 1478 N0.BEDROOMS .3 VALUE 4 7 r i i,' BUILDINdDEPARTMFNT - SETBACKS FRONT 22 REAR 43 L,'FTSIDE (Aj _ RIUHTSID_E _G Permit THIS PERMIT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE REGULti.!ONS CONTAINED IN THE BUILDM IDE, TONING REGULATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES, AND 11 IS HEREBY AGriEEU THAT THE Plan Check WORK WILL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND IN COMOf_IANLZ WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES. THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NO) WAIVE Subtotal —271. .,t_ RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS. CONTRACTOR AND SUB CONTRtCTORS TO HAVE CURRENT CI'iY WSINESS State Tex 7.7 w. LICEMSE.SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR SEWER,PLUMBING AND HEA'ING. Total $278.7e� sDC— 11().Cti PDCN I S0 I1 DITAPP�fCAN1 UR AGENT BY P1 A roved IJCT Receipt No. „, , — _ _ pp ` ADDRESS - PHONE f/ DATE INSP. TYPE INSPECTION REMARKS PLUMBING DATE Contractor II •t bLk NA(. C�u' PermltNo. �2ta+ ,Od g• ���� + jobt 014.0 .. v Rough-in 0=10 cp Fixture — Final HEATING ' Contractor �^ Permit No. Ball or Oil Roughen Y � Final SEWER Final V DRIVEWAY " Final Stora Drainage (Rein Drain)Final Sidewalk Curb&Street Final Approach BLDG.DEPT.FINAL TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE 0=1"NCY C►_RTIF'ICATE OCCUPANCY 5- Final v lar j%cat:ing 7oninq Final 1 t t 1 L Y f IRVIN A. COOPER CIVIL FNMNFFR June 24, 1960 Oprlce 227.4123 WILLAMETTE BUILDING REOIBTERE U' PORTLAND.OREGON 97204 n REGON RE8 2463463 WASHINGTON GOUT POLLCCK, Builder 5918 S.W. Canby St. Portland, OR 97219 YOLO ESTATES Lots 5 6 6 S. W. Pathfinder Court Tigard, OFF Foundation Appraisal Subject: Surface reconnaissance, at the two low level plots, to establish foundation design for Residential StrLJC- tures. The two plots are situated in a .Line of Lots Nos. 1 through 7, r=xtending we3tward off S. W, Walnut Street. Six Residences have been constructed along new Pathfinder .ourt, on foundations well. ahove the small creek that meanders to the rear (north] of the proper-ties. Lots 5 6 6 both possess substantial sloping drop-off, From the street edge to lowland Flat, traversed by n water channel , trip-nary to Fanno Creek, from street elevation of 174 Feet down to 162 feet in twenty feet horizontal distance. Th© lower elevation is 2 to 3 Feet above the existing water channel , flew- lnrlSW to NE, and normally 3 to S Feet in width and 1 to 3 Feet deep, at elevation 158 Ft. + . Ground water I-vel in the area Is at shallow depth, influenced by the channel that Flows all year. YOLD Subdivision lilies and grades were reit by registered �a;urveyor, W. Caswell. ProFessionsl. Engineer R. A . Wright made a study of the creek Flow and established the- high water Flood Elevation at 162 Feet. design of both two-floor atructuren to be constructed entails lower level at elevation 164 feet; upper main Floor at 174 feet, meeting the street at 172 Fent. Page 1 STRUCTURAL, DAMAGE APPRAISALS FOUNDATION.SOIL. INSPECTIONS 8UR VB S INVESTIGATIONS SUMMARY Foundstion proposal For Residences on these two plots is recom- mendwd For preservative-treated piling, driven to Friction resistance of not less then 10 Tons, Uetermination of lengths may be made by 2 or 3 test pi..les, to be rated for loading by Engineering News Formula. (Based upon prior experiences in the Silty-Clay soil with high around water, penetration of 15 to 20 feat should attain this load resistance, with considerable increase expected in 72 hours, after dissipation of the water film attendant with the driving procedure, ) /May 11th sae`? / IAC:cc 1. A. Cooper Consulting Enginner Soils - Foundation Page 2 of 2 If ,....r,. rhCrovr1. i �� ,Ir. i i " ?�. I t, +!. I, K_-� «''� • '�I Ww' \I rM VVVVV 1� I _, ��i� ��r,' �. :1' .•' R.. _ ' �� �� �. �7nu }lltf(� �•• ' „ �� ' ! � liuntClu -. DENNY •'��' .-�' Di •• • \ 5°ei:. / '° .[ .wager,•^ ,iN.• i •F% I' � � — I tach / 0581°t ^ I s Fit ■ ' Garden n I'•e�_ r����I p� ��r �i' �t•.,�.•.'�/ r1� � � � :•J�j• •�, r � R hf0 54 . ��` :� • ' :::'�--- •'"ter. :. ! _ , I •7' fie=r-��e_ �'- i ! t IFanno i•� 5 C s /f �.' �.� J ..r' /% t )•" .Welet �' '' 7''iµ'• r'y'l'u,�. ' e A.,,. U .s a , I• • , q'°fA it PER Y, df .II• V _• I Ie , , jam•\ , _ . . s :. ° Robinsor .- res rlPGruve ' ' . ','�� •z =� I I •'n ' \ rylf � r ,. , ::,/ � r-..-u �1y4 A f:.. •8i. r..•• p`e7k � — .\--'Fn•�..`JI ii �•+�J. �,'1- =1 ,NII• r, l.� .I{ • • 0 . -_ - • n �� 1 � � � e�°r Pp r7- r 21 ,F. n all ••,, • z:.. —. I j 1 Hiteon• T 3T- gmen IPak rr� r ill'` ;,.i. O' '. l.. +� ISI; 'a'1v•AtAI, r� •.+. ••r�•lell %' I nrAf ltlp 1. z e~ ♦' Nyy�`t—�- ' ' 1 t e: .. •�� t t f . J �ilh�, ' O �• ' 1 1, �+ I ''• j' Ig a I n r1� a :P.r' 1 •;/ 1.� � U I V • 11,ALM` r .R ' St An. ^:\S 'O • ��, • . r 111 ,•',i .111 •u' . `'•� V N ) ••\�` � .�' ♦ � }s i. I. I. • . •i TIRO p �I'1 l, '•' .�• �� • �� ''iii:... Z � � '•• +�Sd• J�� � i �ti� � I• �iF'��1 'W�7A. .� ,.'f•\ •fi •�f:� 'rrr �'' • •• .+ ' 1 \n`\ i�-,• /J I _ jr' I�iir ♦ C��" in aTn' t U •lui �� / 1'. a r w � �� , ,Boni i i Elr��1a4. ' A 14 o ~ � "1 /c2 ` 16 lopco ;. I rNu/'f�i ME S / TF PLAN �� cow' SC`/4 b V A Zd -o • , ' /1FS, 30�x ,� � .J�!N� 2�� /yam► . y G : Pi A n f I/ O � l y /4p /.oTGYOLl) t-,,,' AT.ES i I �f 5.�N INC Joy l � /�eyllth�Q��� M i BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION X11 TIGARD DATE.__OF __ __. ___.__... t9_. ___ +� • THE UNDERSIGNED r4EREBY APPLIES FOR APE RMIT FOR THE WORK HEREIN INDICATFD BUILDERPHON1.17 OR AS SHOWN AND APPFIOVED IN THE ACCOMPANYING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Ov.NEFiPH014C.A#5_' 101 } LLOT rro OWNER 'wA —_._. . .�__.. T4Nk ��11�LE—v� JOS ADDRESS s.,�P�rN_E_L!VpR.---- NCoINEE 9UILD[R -T'°!tN..�✓�1��..�'�w -- Ao RE5 it �._et._%y�►r-�►r ___ _ �1��.,t.,.. ..E�. STRUCTURE NEW IJRk Zo-eL _ LJADOITION� L7R_E_PAIR C3FaE'aEVvAL `'JFIHF DAMAGE- bFMULITQf RESICIENCE ❑COMM ❑EDUCATIONAL 0GOV'T OFIELIGIOUS(]PATIO OCAR PURI CIGARAGE ❑570HAGE❑SLA9 r-IFEN;I y�CC,LPANC� "� LArJO t" " ' fP'7_ _..til DG TYPE!!fi7eS!� FIRE ZONF-a. PLAN CHECK BY_ ._ _.., HEAT SEWER _ PERMIT i_- err• • f/ �,.��s�9, QCC_LQAD I I isd . FIEIQHT._4Z_____NP_5T9RIE3_;t_ A o- ' 40a NO 9EOR00M115.__$ -V Lt l' ry BUILDING U. I r PACKS FRONT REAR LEP T SIDE Sit RIGHT SIDE ie Permit ��� - - c TLRM11 IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN THE BUILDING GOOF Plan Check9d ^� ;,ULATICINS AND ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES, AND IT IS HEREBY AGREE?, "!-- - -+n WILL BE DUNE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICA71pNS AND IN COMPLI INCE. vc1 Su')-total Z X0 APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT WPrN' TRiCTIVE COVENANTS, CONTRACTOR AND SUB CONTRACTORS TO HAVE CURRENT C.Ir,r, Arr!.I'" State Tax 7 R_-/ 'ISE ''EPARATE PERMITS REOUIRED FOR SEWER, PLUMBING AND HEATING. Total_-'__ X 7 8 r�# By [Approv � AP LiCANT AGENT ed pt hdo >ti" L 2 481.5 lT f/ SDC - p PDC _i / o c, # r SEWER I ONNECTIOP! $ 6SI�p �� _ SEWER INSPECTION S %z-- -5 SEWER SURCHARGE--l" ---% } Comments : u ,.,I L% G3 i A p 4-1 �M .. 1.1 ! 1 LSF U U LJ I U U P CJ 1 .J'Lj i 1 1 r