The URL can be used to link to this page

11595 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY-2 I __-----------------_______.___-__-. - ---_____--- � ONE U/F ILLUM, PYLON, (70 SQ,FT,) SCA. 3/8' 4 4644 SE 17 th POftnd, Oregon 97202 503 232 2620 15' " to CABINET- ALUM. EXTRU. FLUOR. ILLUM. PNT. ills is an ai inal dosign 'Q 23' `►' ti ,/� COOL GRAY #11 PMS. Created f«ftio excl(irve Lze Of the cusk nor. FACE/S- FRMU.& EMB. LEXAN Until transfe(od t)y sale n BKGND. & DRAW- W�ill-E, and It Is-K)tireserved o b� MATTRESS FACTORY CUTLET LOGO/ COPY- PMSWM.RED `rnpam« hutpomiiss,on from Heam Signs N,'IF!'EG &M& (PED SAME) DAiE 2/18/94 I CUSTOMER APPROVAL POLE COVER- METAL FABRICATED-TEX COAT 1/IED PAINT COOL GRAY #2 PMS. DATE N � w f v 1 t 1 0 N f • D R A W N_8 i SB5 A L S 5 i f PR(IOUCYICc� r'fR T - � I ,,5-t., >�� .� �� "� SLEEP-N-AIRF : ', ,,. 4 mimlj- t, i / TIGARD, OR 1159`, SW p�Jritu;Hwy i of 3G 1 O +♦ f I I If this 11ofice appeal-s c{e;Irer th;ul the JW_ O 's 19% docllillel)(, file Ifgclllllellt is of Illal'oill;ll qualify, �ll(:itUI�I1,11�L:U D1111lllil �l !�!+ mum 0C"l�i� �I�j�l��+;��t t +l►I�liI+I+I+�+i►111+f+;+I+ + i +�+!?j+�+ii i i IiiII;I ii+Il +lil+l ,li hili Ililllil+ i�+ i + + +I+ + + + ill + I � i I i I I i I � � � I. �� I I I i ijll 111111 III � II : iiIIiIiIiIIlIIII{) !lIII!!!l�iNilli!!!!iIlIIIII IIiflfl?I illll!fl!I fi1fl??!1 !??iI?!liifif!i(i!i+iEIII(i1!(II!I!!IIIII!if111 11!111flllii2 4 X iflllli {illlfllfjl{1.{ Illilllltlfl lfl3�lIfEIJII! iIIlliii!111?IiIIIIIIII{�{!;{ II{iiil!{.iIIIIIi{i IIIIIIlIf !I{II{1{{I!{I{I({IIIIIIiIlIIIIIIIIIII{il!! i ! j ) g,O yon •�., ��{��fir! i / „ r,� � ` � ` � �� \ •,• �� 1 / � Eby -1. �. �\ � Cr. T�1=� A X0.22 • 3 ,L:f • ��.� � !fes D � I I• l o � q3 ��• .�I_ _ �� :-\, � tom,-i•r,/�i +��_ � �,� •,��. ., ��\ ��-c!� >=�u_. laf t rl 1 ` � fAj r.,r� �t -ru!� ,�,( � �• , by ,� i�� 1 � --- FEt- .( .•• �(. � yr F TioC 4 EA -Aj i'• zi� TT SITE � , b�� 1 - l.t r'i �{(L. � rte-►:- �..a�F�d h.� -------- S Ir E PLAN 11595 SW Pacific Hwy �� . •/ 2 of 38 If Ihi,� notice al iwar." dem-er 11+,111 Ilse JUL 0 81998 (10C(<<IIej+t, the +IoC,,,,,e„f is of 111,11. 'Jmj1 q„a?i,,• MICROFILMED INCH 1i1 � l�l� (�I�li t ►I�i�l��!I�i��illlllil�,�lili ,lil: + il� i i i i i i i i i t i ! I I 1 1 1 1 l i l i l I I I J i l l lllll�ll�I�li illlil!�IJIJI� � III III I lI1,1lIlI ,lilllllllUlht�IIII111I,11111111�1i��li, t i rim I NI 23'-10' 46-"SE 17 fh POr larks.Oregon 97202 1 503 232 2620 INys is an on Incl dos{gn 2 i roaicxi for ih exduslvu P] use of the customer. { Until tr(Ingored by sale all nghts oro roservod ( REG MARK IN RED an`�0 Is riot to bo rgxoducod In any VINYL ON END mamor Without pormission OF RACEWAY Flom Hoath SQM I ONE SET-ILLUM° CHANNEL-LE-JERS ON RACEWAY —_ DATE 2/9/94 5" CHANNELUME DK,BRNZ. WITH RED 2662 ACRYLIC FACES, SCA, 3/8'=1 ' ILLUM. WITH CLR RED NEON 30ma 2/1, MOUNT TO EXTERIOR CUSTOMER APPROVAL .IJ "`'~d"`O RACEWAY. ALL ELECTRICAL IN RACEV/AY. PAINT RACEWAY TO MATCH BLDG. (TO BE VERIFIED). 3-t -cry DATE EXISTING SET TO BE RE-INSTALLED HERE BY TO BE RE-PAINTED TO MATCH BLDG. -- - --- )/4 �) (I cs 't7> � SOUTH ELEV. 1/8"=1 ' r NEIN SET TO BE INSTALLL� HEilE --- "�' o a w H e r 9 ....-... _. , P , Ava,_ loco •- � gR Al _ -_- �t t�� `" l� ;ti+ ''?�; I '�fl�` T SLEEP NAIRE ",Y� y{' `,xv\ Fgs tl �. 14•t �!* l +.t B�rY TIGARD,OR y 11595 SW Pacific Hwy EAST ELEV. 1 /8"=V 3of36 .O 04-94 If (Ilk nofice appeal-S clearer Iltau 111e ,Illi- U F, 1998 document, Ilse (10CfltlleIII is of mai-oinal quality. IIIC R0 1�11,N]1,"1) �Illlll;l III! !�! i!1J!1�1a !I!i!Iil!;!I! t rl�l!I►J!I!(!�!'!I11'Ii;II!II ! );!I!;Ijl;!I► ! !I!I! Ijllll. ! 111111 i;l;l i 11!1111 Ili;! 1 !;!;III �IIIIII I I I ! i i I ! i I I !►! ! ! �—r-- IIIIlIIIIIIIIIII{► IIII.!lIIIIIiIIEItI!Illllitlll{IIlJlIIl lltllltll tn}1!llt�lllilllill!!I!i!IIIIIIIIIi�llllIl!�lllIIm!ItitI!I„II!III 111l11111111111;11l , . , { ! �rIs111lt,!„Iltl1111111Isl!llilll111'1l„I11Ill,flll1;t►!►„►I,, 77 i I d. `. \ �3I�� c?►•.3' _r �'�ivy' �- ` < �RL�dT.1�fV /k !17` ` 10 IG •`1�� L + / � i;;l ; II•IO mbc , j. < FsKrtt'I - � . ^` / GIG Fi LJ , Oil 011 if vc5r-r OSA � tom.►�•TTt-ii+ , / � - , -; /...� ,�/ , `, . o' j � � '" �, i i° �.►�:A a-! _fib_ i Ya�'1ctFs _ I •J,1 r� C1; j 1�, _y ._...__. � .1+*-t_4 C•� ►--•t. r�.I`.n 1'".► 1 , 1�.*fit:. •j F'l/Y r,i�V„!�!• i-.r��-`I�-"1•',N ,�� -� �1 � �rel'<� 'Za,V C. ccl=•l'ff� SI TF PLAN o,, .:�.;r <.,j I uE �r � N'r � �.�`� � � � , �_� .. , , . , `. . . c�I�•'¢" '1301 j 1 11595 SW Pacific Hwy 4 of 36 \� If this 11olice appears cl":1rer 111,111 the JUL 0 8 1998 110c11n1ent, the document is of 111arl;inal quality. MICROF1I,11 ED '`�I)I�I� IIIIIIIIIIIjI�Ijl�l�! ' liiti�l�l�l�i 1'I�IIljlllll�Ill lj11lji� lj!►I 1 iIljlll� l,l(! ! l�Ijl !�1lijl ! Ijljill IjIII I'III�I(IIII�i;i i illllj{ Ilijljl I ijljl ijllljl Ijijlji I(I�I•! { 1 IIIjIIIIIIIIIIIII fill IIIII11�1lIIIIUlllflflltl 11!1!l1LIII11!I!i !1111!!!! {!!EI!{IIlIIIEi!III II!!IIII!III!IIEII! 11!!11111 1!!IIIif!1111111{I!IIEl1�!IIIItIIIIIflllll!!Illllf;lll�1lff!!I!llJltt IIIIINiitlfiIll i{{ IIII1{f{' NIIIIIli,lIIIIII!! 11111!!11 !11111{sl NlII{{IIIIIIIIIIIIIIr Ill III 1on. II END __ _-- ----.-.__._ 23'-10' 4644 SE 17 th Portland, Oregon 97202 503 2322620 3' It*a an od inal douan 2' A kloated for the oxclusivo �R use of the customer linftl transfer©d by solo _- — - all rights aro reserved REG MARK IN RED Und It is not Io be roproduc©d In any VINYL ON END manner vAttxxjt pormim on OF RACEWAY tnxn Heath SQ-0 ONE SET I DATE _LLUM.CHANNEL LETTERS ON RACEWAY_ _ 2/9/94 5" CHANNELUME DK,BRNZ. WITH RED 2662 ACRYLIC FACES, SCA. 3/8`=1' ILLUM. WITH CLR RED NEON 30ma 2/1. IViOUNT TO EXTERIOR CUSTOMER APPROVAL RACEWAY. ALL ELECTRICAL IN RACEWAY. PAINT RACEWAY 4� TO MATCH BLDG. (TO BE -VERIFIED), �.I, �aAI DATE JA EXISTING: SET TO BE RE-INSTALLED HERE BY - - RACEWAY TO BE RE-PAINTED TO MATCH BLDG, .y SOUTH ELEV. 1/8 = 4 -- I Ni W SET TO BE INSTALLED HERE- o Y A Y/ N ! r, ' b r Ava1= /0001 I Ift Orr *Er�)r C I PI1t:�� rnj `s��?i �`�T SLEEP N AIRF , . TIGARD,OR EAST ELEV. 1 /8"=V 11595 SW Pacific Hwy 5 0!36 P0_204-94• , I . I ..aa., If Ihix nolicr at►lTcstrs clt•:u•rE• tlt;tn Iltr' jm- 0 81998 doclltllt'tll, Ihv ductrntent is of mnrRin;tl yrt;llit, !�I�I� Ijl �ljl liljl{i�lji{I�� I�i�ijl�ifiljl 1'ljl�l{l�lj!{III ISI{I{Ijljljl'I Ijlj!;I�I;i{I I Ijl{iIlljl{i I 1{I{i�l�l�l{III{i{I{I�l��ii P Iji{Ijf�ljl�l�l I ill{I�i{I{I�i ISI{I�I�I{i{I• am III�IIIIIIIII{1111 lill�lllilllll�l!t!Ilfif�lftl !I}!�H?LItT .illlill Ilil�I}!I 1111�?lilllll!1!1!1 !!II{IIIIIiI!!!!II! ILII{ILII IIIIIHlI��lll1 !!!?�111►slll{�1111�1f1:�lllllllll�ltl!I•!!!:IIH! 1111�1iliill{ili;li 1111�111i ILII{lllilllll�lti) Illl�lill !tll�l{u 1141�fI11lllll�lllllll�l;lllij: iw....�..... ,. rrrn.war- ---•--=..�s.r.r..:+....,.. ....,�:.. q-3 �j- u Ln r 1 , . 4; -4 �,\si� - � ;.�,.�� I�+�'•,�' ...--"''1 �.�, "� ,ice' �'. ,'� ��-�•�l��t,� ` �.�� L "`�� / ' p / • X11 Wr`ri �--�.iik'�/�, �.i�i�1-fir._I •�� ,T �, `�.� ! 1 �� ,�� ,� i• .'� <;FIVM `•--��. -� _—� i ��_� • ��w� r� �'�. otos-- l.n c�t'1�fi•i S I ---� \ tom.:,•-ttu�v an ,� � •-��r fi�l� ,S 1TF/ PLAN `�c�,, ' .�y' � -�. -:��u<�� z PL 912 `j � - � • 11595 SW Pacific Hwy '�}-� ` •/ J , I�� 8 of 38 \� � ♦� C1 )i. If this uufice appear, clearer than the JUL 0 8 1998 document, the docrument is of• marginal yualif. . 11 WROFI[-,MED '�I)III� IIIIIII i� lIIIl�IIl�i I�IIiI1�I;II1 !•iJlllII�IIIIIIi IIlIIIi�IilCI 1 iC�I�;lilllll I Iills;liiltti 11IIiiII lI1Il i IIIIiII'Ilii � iliilli IIiIIII I illll illl!II IIiIiII i�l�f•! 17 IMCM MADt IM CN � i III�IIIi�IIIIIIII! IIIIIIlIIII!IIII!!!I1111I1!ai11,111!11,11111MI !Illl!!!11!!!iii►I !In1!17,1!IIIItIIIIIIIIlII I!!llliil 11lilllitlillllliill!fitllltilllUllllllllllllllilttl!ttfaft!!!I!!11 tilllNli itllli{{IiIIIIIII!{ IIIII{I.1 lIIlilill IIfIIlI11 !111I1!t1i11i1I{IIIIIIIIII111111liIiIllllf esti s �� r `i 4 5, r •Y�Mwi.V � •- a� U a s joi "�G «- W Z�• Z atrI- � th 0� � W ' MAX, t.tGti161TF,4 Ivo' o N x 1 y . LEGEND «� W W�-µJ„� ►OD� �- EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE: CD SUPPLY - T-BAR Ufa„V2 Jt <.W r.a \ AC-1 CARRIER MODEL 148TJD014 CD-1 SUPFLY - SURFACE MOUNT � o I c Ft l i NOMINAL 12 1/2 TONS, 5000 CFM 0 . 5 Si' 220 MBTU INPUT / 176 MBTU OUTPUT 80% AFUE of 0o 07 M ii 208-230V / 60HZ / 3 PHASE MCA - 65. 2 / MOCP - 80. 0 SD-1 SIDEWALL m`> - ?Z- SD-2 SIDEWALL, Wta"'4 9u' 'z 460V / 601iZ / 3 PHASE; MCA - 30 . 3 / MOCP - 35 �� >r <r N (available voltage unknown at this time) aOP: Aa' ! B . 9 SEER!� RETURN - T-BAR ��__� z R Q i W/CURB, & ECONOMIZER CRG CONTROLS - HONEYWELL T7300 PROURI134MABLE THERMOSTAT CRG-1 RETURN - SURFACE MOUNT W G �`ir� `\ 1237 LBS. 12 rEF� CEILING EXHAUST FAN Q CEF-1 HROAN MODEL x'688 0 �--,-�_ \ 50 CFM 01.0 SP 2 . 0 SONES i��- — ---- 16 �4� CK 120V / 60 HZ / 1 PHASE EF EXHAUST FAN (tYP OF 2) CONTROLS - WITH LIGHT SWITCH FD FIRE DAMPER VD VOLUME DAMPER Ol ....� x i2"� EXISTING RELOCATE I X REMOVE Q X000i'..C) cn PooF NEW > ►1J 14�', )- ({� i I�ti VTR VENT THRU ROOF i THERMOSTAT 5 SENSOR 1 CONNECT TO EXISTING Q SMOKE DETECTOR Lit !1 uD —G-- GAS PIPING } L L A\ �J 7 � v W h _ l`c � w W z � 3 a � U o � • z a. �o o T ...a. 0a x CJ W r1iea9y--��y Al drop... LLJ (nCr` By: ._._....._ _ W Cr- in CUZ w2. 0 rn_z a M tl W MOW nc r 14 JOB NO 11595 SW Pacific Hwy 7 of 36 SHT No WL1JMRIn 9i UFPRINT 6 " +RFORC'FR NO 55139 If this notice appears clearer thin the JUL 0 8 IM document, the document is of marginal qualiti,. MICROFILMED i ii�9�l�,tlii� 1�1�1►�iliilli �1+I�i►,iliil 11111111w i+i `�i;1ii i�i+iii,iji�l�l I t Moll MADE IM C I!N -T�i 1 ! ! . .__ _ D EIilllll!IIIII'II!II! '! !I!lilllif!!!+�'!!!ji!!!!!I!!1!! ! !i!!I+!! �(!!�!!!!�!!!,('^;I! !!►!�!r{! I(►!:}{{iii{!!I!!I!1!!!!{I!!fY!!!!�!{ilii{!lilili � ill{�11�1.111{111,1 Ullfl,li„!!I�11�1111�1��„!iII111.111111I{IIIli1t,� "i i, WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES INC , WSIN INSTALLATION GUIDELINESWSI MATERIAL LIST i WSI Flange Cul DESIGN LOADS (PSF) L.D FF _ --- -- FIELD ATTACH STIFFENERS --- - ------ - --- Mark Depth Series Grade Qnty. Length LIVE' DEAD PART. TOTAL (7.) JOBSITE HANDLING & STORAGE GENERAL NOT",-, SPRINKLER AND DUCT DETAILS � � PTO ERE STIFFENER DETAIL. f}�r R1 26" - __- WSI JOISTS MUST BE HANDLED AND STORED TO OR SUBJECTED TO PROLONGED EXPOS' YY 424 2100 41 29 -0 2� 15 - 40 115 EXPOSURE TO WEATHER. JOISTS MUST BE DESIGNED TO SUPPORT ATTACPED SPRINKLER SYSTEMS IT IS -- - -- -- - PREVENT DAMAGE TO THE WEB AND/OR CHORDS DO NOT HANDLE OR STORE JOISTS WITH THE JOISTS IN RECOMMENDED THAT 3 PSF BE INCLUDED IN THE BASIC DEAD LOAD FOR SPRINKLER R2 26" 424 2100 2 - 31r-0" 25 15 - 40 115 / 1 JOIST LAYOUT MUST BE FOLLOWED A5 SHOWN ON THE FRAE IG PLAN BRANCH LINES MAINS SHOULD BE ANALYZED INDIVIDUALLY. / r WHICH WILL IMPAIR THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY 1 HORIZONTAL POSITION. ALL. JOBSITE HANDLING /`,iJD TO INSURE PROPER INSTALLATION OF JOISTS ANY CHANGES FROM T - --- - - - -�--- OF THE JOISTS. WSI JOISTS SHOULD REMAIN STORAGE OF WSI JOISTS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE THIS LAYOUT COULD RESULT IN OVERSTRESSING THE JOISTS AND/OR - r 1 [! BUNDLED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. JOISTS MUST ERECTOR. SHORTAGES OF MATERIAL, FOR WHICH WESTERN WOOD STRUCTURES, INC - _ --- - NOT BE STORED IN CONTACT WITH THE GROUND, WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE. FLOOR OR ROOF / FLANGE HANGER / I SHEATHING - USE COMMON TYPE NAILS UNIFSS NOTED OTHERWISE. USE 2 - NIB SCREWS HATH tVi" / \ / ERECTION BRACING FILL ALL NAIL HOLES IN JOIST HANGERS SFE BEARING DETAILS FOR PENETRATION INTO FI ANGE } 4x6 BLOCKS, BRACES, - -- - - -- --- - --- - -- - NAII TYPES. AND FILLERS .ARF BY ACCESSORIES 1. i+RACE EACH JOIST, AS IT IS ERECTED, USING HANGERS, W51 TYPE "B" BLOCKING, RIM JOISTS, OR X-BRIDGING - PREBORE lhri" LEAD HOLE OTHERS. AT EACH SUPPORT. WSI JOIST �' - LOCATE SCREWS WITHIN ib" Of I 2. BRACE ENDS OF OVERHANGING JOISTS WITH WSI TYPE "C" BLOCKING, RIM JOISTS, X-BRIDGING OR TEMPORARY Roo AND FLANGE - ' FLANGE CENTERLINE. - Blocking Panels - Web Stiffeners Hangers BRACING HANGER --- Joist 0/C Joist Joist Joist 1-- 3. TEMPORARY LINES OF 1x4 BRACING MUST BE ATTACHED TO A LATERAL SUPPORT AND THE TOP FLANGE OF � � � HANr;ER EACH JOIST WITH 2-8d NAILS. THE LATERAL SUPPORT CAN CONSIST OFA BRACED END WAIL OR BEAM. WEB STIFFENER DETAIL �-- Mark Depth Spcg. Series Qnty. Lin. Ft. Mark Depth Series Qnty. Qnty. Model Nu_rnb�er___ PERMANENTLY INSTALLED SHEATHINC OR A 4' STRIP OF TEMPORARY SHEATHING CONCENTRATED LOAD SEE NOTE #?) _ --- 5426 261 424 185 78 HIT 426 COACH SL'REW ROO HANGER FLOOR OR RUGr HANGER NAILING SCHEDULE - - -- - - - - - ---- SNUG FIT - FLUOR OR PERMANENT - / - USE J4" COACP SCREW ROD WITH SHEATHING HANGER TOP -- FACE JOIST - 5 WPI 426 R53' SHEATHING IF END WALL (OR 1 fill 426 4-16D _6-16D 2-IUD x 1V2" ( I j + 4 1iVVI 426-2 - BEAM) AT END OF BAY IS _._-_ Ilh" PENETRATION INTO FLANGE. �./ MISC. & NOTES 1 A WPI azs 2-IDD 4' MIN. PREBORE V4" LEAD HOLE. - WSI JOIST 2-10D x TVI" e 9 N01 BRACED LATERALLY. •• }�'- - � � -- -- -- r ATTACH WITH 8d 1B HM 426-2 4-N20A - 6-100 52 52 NAILS - INSTALL ROD WITHIN 4 OF FLANGE - - - - AT 6 O.C. MAXIMUM. FACE NAIL WSI E01'AL CENTERLINE. TYPE "B""B" T WITH 85 EACH 2x4 x 44V2" P.E.B. W/ Z-CLIPS BOTH ENDS . 7O SUPPORT WITH � �, HANGER FULLY - 2" MAXFLOOR OR ROOT ••- INSTALLED PER /�. 2 ROWS OF 10ci _ - _- RODGHANGERw 26 EACH 2x4 x 48 P.E.B. W/ Z-CLIP ONE END MANUFACTURERS � \- `� NAIL; ® 12" O.C. -._-.__ __- SHEATHING _ - RECOMMENDATIONS. �� - �� '�� MAXIMUM. - -- / \�� \� ` / - - - FIELD ATTACH STIFFENERS 26 EACH Z-CUPS (LOOSE) \ TOP FLANGE - _ ter- TO EACH SIDE OF JOIST(S) -`- ---- - PER STIFFENER DETAIL. MAX �- WSI JOIST -� CLAMP HANGER ' +' - INSTALL PER MANUFACTURERS + EQUAL RECOMMENDA PONT _-- G E N E F�ALN N O T E S SNUG FIT - DO NOT EXCEED THE MANU- FACTURERS RATED CAPACITY } -__ } - ,JOISTS ARE 26" DEEP & SPACED 48"O/C TYPICAL --- --- ---- 10' MAX ---- � � � - \ 1x4 TEMPORARY �---CLAMP =� l + , SCALE : Ve" - 1'--0" i BRACING ATTACHED AT HANGER J DESIGN LOq�I NAIL X-BRIDGING TO TOP �- �� BOTH TOP AND BOTTOM - ----� DEAD LOAD = 15 PSF AND BOTTOM CHORUS /' , FLANGES WITH 2'-8d - + _ LIVE LOAD = 25 PSF WITH 2-lOd NAILS. ---- -- .- �. NAILS, -- `�.r- - \ -- FLOOR OR ROOF SNOW DRIFTING AS SHOWN. - WSI TYPE 'C' BLOCKING WITH - SHEATHING - - END BLOCKS. ATTACH WITH DIMENSION LINES ARE TO FACE OF C.M.U. WALLS NAIL EACH JOIST TO SUPPORTS -- 2-10d NAILS THROUGH JOIST TRAPEZE HANGER 3� HANGER AND [ OF BEAMS TYPICAL, WITH 2-10d NAIL, 1 EACH WEB 10 END BLOCKS. NOTES: - HEADER SIZE AS REQUIRED FOR ✓1 SIDE OF JOIST. WARNING 1. WSI JOISTS 14" AND DEEPER REQUIRE WEB LOAD. USE 2x4 MINIMUM. -WSI JOIST -- `-""-- --- - STIFFENERS AT SUPPORTS UNLESS NOTFD HANGER NAILING SCHEDULE ( 9 VERIFY ALL CLOUDED DIMENSIONS, NOTES OTHERWISE. - USE 4"0 BENT ROD MINIMUM AND DETAILS. UNANSWERED QUESTIONS J01:,T5 ARE UNSTABLE AND WILL NOT CARRY LOAD UNTIL CONSTRUCTION, (LE. ONE MAN AND ONE LAYER OF LOOSE WITH NUT AND WASHEP. HANGER TOP _ FACE JOIST WIC! JEIAY FABRICATION AND DELIVERY. FULLY BRACED AND SHEATHED. DO NOT ALLOW WORKERS SHEATHING), ON UNRRACEu JOISTS CAN RESULT IN 2. WEB STIFFENERS ARE REQUIRED AT HANGERS HIT 426 4-16D 6-160 2-IOD x 1V2" O Y. ON WSI JOISTS PRIOR TO COMPLEPON OF BRACING STEPS SIDEWAYS BUCKLING OR ROLLOVER, DO NOT PLACE - CENTER ROD BETWEEN JOISTS. - _ �-----� -_ 1�-3. LACK OF CONCERN FOR BRACING OF JOISTS DURING ADDITIONAL LOADS SUCH AS BUNDLES Or LUMBER OR WHICH DO NOT PROVIDE LATERAL SUPPORT OF __ _ 2 HN 426-2 4-N20A 6-100 8 THE TOP FLANGE AND AT CONCENTRATED LOADS CONSTRUCTION CAN RESULT IN SERIOUS ACCIDENTS. LIGHT PLYWOOD ON M'SI JOISTS. GREATER THAN 1000 LBS. - ATTACH HEADER TO JOISTS � S 3. SEE DOUBLE JOIST DETAIL FOR DOUBLE JOIST WITH 2 - 8d NAILS MINIMUM CONSTURCTION. FILLERS ARE BY OTHERS. ' -- TRAPEZE � �, HANGER 4. 4.x6 BLOCKS, BRACES, AND FILLERS ARE BY 3 USF 10d NAILS AT JOISTS 31h" WIDE AND -- 8d NAILS AT JOISTS 21"1" WIDE. -� OTHERS. ALLOWABLE HOLE SIZES 4. SUPPORT STIFFENERS TO NAILING SCHEDULE: - TABLE VALUE PREVENT DAMAGE TO JUIS'f m- WHILE DRIVING NAILS. 1 4 T �M1N. DISTANCE.) WSI DEPTH ---- NAILS P'EQ'D # c'J' "r-nT # #'� "� # INSTRUCTIONS: 16" AND LESS ------- 4 44�-8" 5 QQ N T NAIL THROUGH TOP 18" 20" 6 2�4 HEADER (MINIMUM) - ---ATTACH 2x4 TO WEB -- - --- _ _-_ - _ 22'-3Y4" 22'-411" _ I. FIND .101ST DEPTH IN LEFT MARC 4IJ AND READ -------- NTH 4-8d NAILS +--- - - `- -- - - `- --- - -- - -- - ACROSS TO NEAREST DESIRED HOLE SIZE TO OR BOT FOM FLANGE TO INSTALL 22" - 26" --- ----- 8 \ AND CLINCH. ! - 1 1 - DETERMINE COLUMN TO USE. STIFFENERS. 28" - 32" --- ---- 10 i (, 2. FIND NEAREST JOIST SPAN IN LOWEf; TAI3LE DUCT - WOOD SCREW.-% - �` ---- 40 PSF AND AT COLUMN SELECTED ABOVE READ WARNING: JOISTS WILL NOT CAkRY -- _-- -- -- - PREDRILL IF LARGER OAA, -'--- �- + DISTANCE FROM CENTERLINE OF SUFPORI TO THAN Nle"0 CENTERLINE OF HOLE. DESIGN LOADS IF STIFFENERS ARE NOT - - Dl7 NOT CUT INHATCHED AREAS i INSTALLED PROPERLY. 3. TABLE MAY BE INTERPOLAT1nD. 1 I 1A 4' _4' EXAMPLE- FABRICATION AND DELIVERY � - j V) -_ SPAN ►� � � � CAREFULLY CLI T: - -`-- -- `- -- 22" JOIST WITH 11" HOLE AND 7.8' SPAN � I LLj R2A & R28 FROM 1--R2, m in R2( & R2D FROM 1-R2. 1. FROM UPPER HALF OF TABLE SELECT COLUMN 4. L T p 1. WESTERN WOOD STRUCTURES, INC. SUGGESTS THAT THE PUCHASER SUBMIT THESE ')HCIP JO CIRCULAR HOLE DIkMETER IN. DOUBLE JOI►�T CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS TO THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER AND ARCHITECT OF RECORD FOR THEIR \ REVIEW AND APPROVAL. BUILDING DEPARTME14T APPROVAL, IF REQUIRED. IS THC \ DEPTH -ZIIC. _ZOL-3'--L`BL � �; � 2. AT 28' SPAN AND COLUMN 4, IN THE LOWER RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PURCHASER. � - HALF OF TABLE. CENTERLINE OF HOLE MIDST o 10 - 3 4 6 6 BE 7'-0" FROM CENTERLINE OF SUPPORT I 12 - 4 5 6 7 7 2. THE PURCHASER SHOULD REVIEW JOIST LENGTHS Z.ND QUANTITIES, PAYING PARTICULAR � 14 3 4 6 7 8 9 ATTENTION TO OPENINGS REQUIRED FOR PLUMBING TRAPS, ME':HANICAL DUCTS, ROOF Y' 16 3 5 6 8 10 10 NOTES: DRAINS, AND OWER NON TYPICAL FRAMING. CHANGES IN MATERIALS OR QUANTITIES 17(+2)-Rl 1 18 4 5 7 9 11 12 ^ � MUST BE NOTED ON SHOP DRAWINGS. ALL CHANGES MUST BE RECEIVED AT LEAST 20 4 6 8 10 12 14 1. 00 NOT CUT OR DAMAGE FLANGES. THREE WEEKS PRIOR TO DESIRED DELIVERY 22 I 4 7 9 11 13 15 r 24 5 7 10 12 14 17 2. DO NOT CUT THE WEB WITHIN 4" OF THE RETURN SHOP DRAWINGS WITH CHANGES TO: 26 5 8 10 13 16 18 CENTER OF SUPPORT. ATTACH FILLER BLOCKS TO EACH + ' 28 6 8 11 14 17 20 / WESTERN WOOD STRIICTURES, INC, - 8 0 J015F AS REQUIREO.� 30 6 9 12 15 IB 20 3. WHERE MORE THAN ONE HOLE IS DESIRED / P.0 BOX 130 32 6 10 13 16 19 20 THE CLEAR DISTANCE BETWEEN HOLES MUST 20675 SW 105th St. 2 °° o ��-', N SPAN i_1N UM DISTANCE_.FR_0l1 SUPPORT CENTER WNL rr.-W. _ EQUAL OR EXCEED TWICE THE LNIAMETER OF x \ TUALAIIN, OREGON 97062 2A 2 a a v 10 1-3 1-6 2-0 2-6 3_0 3_6 SHE LARGEST HOLE, OR TWICE THE LONGEST UE OF A RECTANGULAR HOLE. I 3. TO COORDINATE PELIV RY c _ B1 i 12 1-3 1-9 2-6 3-0 - - E ,DHEA-T CUSTOMER SERVICE AT U3 69 9 n B2 I 36 4 3 (5 ) 2 60_. 14 1-6 2-0 2-9 ?-6 4-3 5-0 I B 16 1-6 2-6 3-3 4-0 4-y S 6 4. EXCEPT AS NOTED IN 1, 2, AND 3 ABOVE A t" HOLE MAY BE CUT ANYWHERE. BUTT JOISTS AND NAIL TOGETHER I I 18 1-9 2-9 3-6 4-6 5-6 6-3 T" WITH TWO ROWS OF 16d NAILS 20 2-0 3-0 4-0 5-0 I 6-0 7-0 K" GAP �� AT 16" 0/C (STAGGERED) EACH PROBLEMS? 22 2-3 3-3 4-6 5-6 1 6-6 7-9 5. THE LONGEST SIDE OF A RECTANGULAR ',OLE SIDE of oouBLE. PRODUCT INFORMATION 24 2-6 3-6 4-9 6-0 I 7-3 8-6 SHALL NOT EXCEED THREE-FOURTHS OF THE --DAMAGED .JOISTS 26 2-6 4-0 5-3 6-6 7-9 9-0 ALLOWABLE ROUND HOLE DIAMETER. ---IMPROPER FIT � 28 2-9 4-3 5-6 7-•0 8-6 9-9 1. DESCRIPTION: ViSl JOi5T PER INTERNATIONAL_ CONFERENCE -2x! PLYWOOD EDGE BLOCKING 30 3-0 4-6 6-0 7-6 9-0 10-6 6. THIS TABLE IS FOR SIMPLE SPANS WITH -FIELD MODIFICATIONS OF BUILDING OFFICIALS(LC.8.0.) REPORT NO. PFC-4544 32 3-3 4-9 6-6 8-0 9-6 11-3 UNIFORM LOADS ONLY. MOTES: --OUEST1ONs ABOUT ;. MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS: WITH Z-CLIPS ATTACHED. 34 3-6 5-R 6-9 8-6 THESE DRAWINGS A.) FLANGES: MACHINE STRESS RATED. 10-3 12-0 i) SUPPORT BACK OF FLANGE DURING NAILING TO PREVENT DAMAGE OF ) r rr 2r-Orr 36 3-6 5-,, 7-3 9-0 10-9 12-6 7. EXCEPTIONS TO THESE RULES MIVI BE POSSIBLE. WEB--FLANGE CONNECi10N. W.W.SI JOIST REP. B. WEB: PLYWOOD- C-C STRUCTURAL I. 2 -8 U 38 3-9 5-9 7-6 9-6 11-6 13-3 CONTACT YOUR WSI TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE. 2) BLOCK SOLID BETWEEN JOISTS FOR FULL LENGTH OF SPAN. USE CONTACT: VICTOR PE RA SON ORIENTED STRAND BOARD- EXPOSURE 1. - - - 40 4-0 6-0 8-0 10-0 12-0 14-0 J 5V2" WIDE BLOCKS TYPICAL. (BY INSTALLER) C.) ADHESIVE: EXTERIOR TYPE PER U.B.C. NO. 25-19. PHONE 1-800-547-5411 r b 22-R1 _- --- -- GLULAM SPECIFICATIONS MATERIAL = Douglas Fir : 24f-V4 & V8 ADHESIVE = 100% Waterproof Glue FABRICATION = As Shown Jk Noted APPEARANCE = Industrial S3S FINISH = End Seal Only _ J PROTECTION = Load Cover --- --- - -- -- -- - -_ O CERTIFICATE = AITC 117-87 / APA--EWS THE ENGINEER'S STAMP IS TO CONFIRM THAT THESE JOISTS ARE DESIGNED TO •.r-" --•--- -- - - v CARRY THE LOADS SHOWN FOR THE SPANS AND SPACINGS INDICATED ABOVE. �..r a t t NOTE 8�'a" x 281/2 GLUCAN ni THIS THE PES194 LOADS WERE PROVIDED BY OTHERS .AND THEIR ACCURACY HAS NOT .�"` �y - - V END BEEN VERIFIED. IF THE LOADS, SPANS, OR SPACINGS ARE INCORREC I OR LO WILD INCOMPLETE. NOTIFY WESTERN WOOD STRUCTURES, INC. IMMEDIATELY. NEITHER MATERIAL. WILL BE MANUFACTURED THE WSI JOISTS ARE DESIGNED FOR THE SPANS, THE ENGINEER NOR WESTERN WOOD STRUCTURES, INC. CAN BE RESPONSIBLE AS DETAILED ON THESE DRAWINGS SPACINGS AND LOADS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. FOR THE DESIGN OR MANUFACTURE OF THESE JOISTS IF ALTERED OR USED IN R PLEASE SPECIFY ADDITIONAL LOADS, IF REQUIRED, APPLICABLE TO JOIST DESIGN MODIFICATIONS. ANY MANER NOT SHOWN SPECIFICALLY ON THE CALCULATIONS, NOR ARE THEY (NEON. UNITS, DRIFTING SNOW, SPRINKLER MAINS) RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN OF THE GLULAM BEAMS OR OF THE SUPPORTING 1 REQ'D Bi - -_ - - -37'-0 -- -- IND. S3S A -C=1 24F-V4 STRUCTURE. ADDITIONAL JOISTS MAY BE REQUIRED. ra c 1 Q J PROJECT: 1 �•' ��'� ', _ -__ _.__ -- .� - - - R e t v i I B_u i I d i_n WEST ERN WOOD c~ L' I PN ` •`� LOCATION: Tigard, Oregon m „ THIS r�L �•�:,,., ,� _� -. �. � ----- - __ -_ Cn `��'� x 3U GI 'il_AM B2 END - STRUCTURES NCO ARCHITECT: Oregon Business Architecture P.C. -- -- -- - Z WILD - L- _- ENGINEER: pale Dlloreto P.O. BOX 130 TUALATIN, GREGON 97062 CONTRACTOR: Yorke & Curtis, Inc. Q A �Y ,F 1gR, � -_ c�� 11595 SW Pacific Hwy t'4 G1��P _ 503/692-6900 FAX 503/692-6434 DRAWN 6Y: veP DATE 12 22 93 J� 931185 - �- e of 36 1 REQ B2 53r-0" IND. S3S C=0 24F-V8 - - - --- _ a - - -- a?cp Nom �' 30'�r' I\� 1/10/54 PER SUBMITTAL REVI IONS VTiP I AEFIUATE AZ CA ID MT CHECKED RY: JS DATE 12/23/93 N0 ----- -�� - MEMBER FROM: NV UT WA WY' 800/547--5411 - - -- - PL T DATE SHT. i `!C�•„�}¢ NO. DATE REVISIONS BY DATE PRINTED: - -` - `---- _1�0f94_ ri If this nlllice :1pI1e;lrs Clearer th;u► II►r. � JUL 81998 docTlment, IINe dOCllilleilt is of n11rQinal (111.0it• . MICROFILMED I�Ijll!�I �lil !�i!I{!I!{I{! i l,lrl{I I{i{1 I'I{lII�I INII l �Il�i'!}i I�I�i�I I{ISI IIl�lil{I ! ?jl t illjl�l 3�l�4�1 I N II{I{I If I{I! ,11C11 MADE t� a+,w, - - -- - # _ I lilllllll�!I!!IlI11�!!!III!li,itlllli!IIIH!I!1lII!1,!!Thlil!Il�IIII!!,!!!!!rr!! 1i!! !nlli!II�i!:�I�rII! II•rII I I,IIII� 1�� nIII I� I. I�+III i�rl� �rrl �Ir ;rj � ,Ir r�nr, ++I r�_ rr I t. l„ IILi,.,...,ii.l .UI{I,lil . .l .t.!I,IL14,! ,.,I,...., ,11,.,, ,II ,, II,..•„ rl;ill{.I,+.11 !N11 I, „11111111�1111� r!1 ,11f�1111µ1i4111111111�1illlf!!i�lI11lI, }r, a t 7:I CONTENTS REPORT OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS GEOTECHNICAL ENC1NEERING SERVICES The subsurface conditions at the site were explored by excavating eight test pits at the Pane No_ PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING approximate locations shown in Figure 2, using subcontracted excavating equipment owned and TIGARD, OREGON operated by C&H Excavating of Clackamas, Oregon. The test pit excavations were continuously INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 FOR monitored by a staff engineer from GecJEngineers who maintained a detailed log of the soils . . . . 1 FRANCESCHI PROPERTIES encountered, obtained representative soil samples, and observed ground water conditions. The PURPOSE AND SCOPE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . subsurface exploration program is described in Appendix A. The soil samples were visually SITE DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 INTRODUCTION classified in accordance with the classification system described in Figure A-1. Test pit logs are SURFACE CONDITIONS 2presented in Figures A-2 through A-8. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3 This report prestnts the results of C��Engineers' geotechnical engineering evaluation of the site of the proposed office building located at 11595 Southwest Pacific Highway in Tigard, Test pits TP-1, TP-6 and TP-8 are located in areas that currently are paved. In these test pits, '--1/2 to 4 inches of asphalt concrete underlain by 3 to 6 inches of gravel was encountered CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Oregon. The site location relative :o surrounding physical features is shown in Figura 1. GENCRAL 3 We were informed that the site will be developed for commercial/industrial purposes. Site at the ground surface. The pavement section was underlain by stiff to very stiff silt with trace Report of Geotechnical Engineering SITE PREPARATION 4 llinclude ntnction of a 5,000-square-foot structure with associated access tine sand to the depths explored. WET WEATHER CONSIDERATIONS 4 development pans ncue cosl , q The remainder of the test pits are located within the limits of the backtiiled tank removal Services STRUCTURAL FILL 5 roads and parking areas. Design loads were not available at the time of this report. The Proposed Office SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS 6 proposed layout is shown in Figure 2. Pro Building excavations. In these test pits, approximately 0.5 foot of gravel was encountered at the ground p g FLOOR SLABS 6surface, Test pits TP-2 tan through TP-5 are located within the limits of the gasoline k Tigard, Oregon RESISTANCE TO SLIDING 6 We were also informed that the site was occupied by a service station owned by Gull Industries, Inc. of Seattle, Washington. Applied Geotechnology, Inc. of Portland. Oregon, excavation. In test pits -rP-2 and TP-4, till consisting of up to 6 feet of soft to medium stiff silt PAVEMENT DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 6 underlain by loose gravel was encountered to the depths explored. In test pits TP-3 and TP-5, SITE DRAINAGE 7 completed a subsurface contamination study of the site in 1989 and monitored the removal of the April 30, 1993 OBSERVATION OF CONSTRUCTION 7 USTs (underground storage tanks) as well as approximately 570 cubic yards of contaminated soil till consisting of approximately 2 to 4 feet of stiff to very stiff silt underlain by native medium (-IMITATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 in 1990 and 1991. The contaminated soil was treated on site by land farming. The resulting stiff to very stiff silt was enr�untered beneath the surficial gravel till. Test pit TP-7 is located excavations reportedly were a maximum of 12 feet deep and were backfilled with clean, within the limits of the waste oil tank removal excavation. In this test pit, loose gravel was imported, granular material below the seasonal high water table and above treated soil. The encountered from the ground surface to the maximum depth explored (10 feet). The test pit FIGURES Figure No. backfill materials reportedly were placed in 1-foot-thick lifts and compacted with a vibratory could not be advanced deeper because of the severe caving observed below 4 feet. Vicinity Map 1 Ground water seepage was not observed in test pits TP-1 and TP-3. Slight to moderate For s o roller. Tlie approximate limits the remedial excavations are shown in Figure 2. The service Site Plan 2 a ground water seepage was observed in test pits TP-5, TP-6 and TP-8 at depths between 6.0 and Franceschi Properties station building, including two hydraulic lift., and a floor drain inside the building, were not removed during UST removal and remedial excavation activities. The approximate location. of 8.5 feet below the ground surface. Heavy ground water seepage was observed in test pits TP-2, APPENDICESTP-4 and TP-7. The :seepage observed in these test pits generally occur: at shallower depths Page No. the service station building is shown in Figure 2. Following backfilling, DEQ (Oregon APPENDIX A Field Explorations A-1 Department of Environmental Quality) issued a lette 'o Gull Industries on September 11, 1991 and was associated with water contained within the gravel backfill materials. indicating that no further action was required at the site. All soil samples obtained from the test pit excavations were tested to determine moisture content, and two samples were tested to determine the in-situ dry density. The moit:;:lre contents APPENDIX A FIGURESand dry densities are summarized in Table B-1. A brief description of the laboratory testing Figure No. PURPOSE AND SCOPE Soil Classification System A-1 The purpose of our services is to (1) explore the subsurface conditions at the site to provide procedures is presented in Appendix B. Log of Test Pits A-2 ... A-9 the basis for geotechnical design recommendations for general site development and for support CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the proposed structure, and (2) evaluate the adequacy of the remedial excavation backfill materials to- support of the proposed structure. The specific scope of our proposed services is GENERAL summarized below. In our opinion, the proposed office building can be supported on shallow spread footings. However, portions of the proposed building are located within the limits of the remedial. 1. Explore subsurface conditions by excavating eight test pits. Observe ground water conditions in the test pit explorations. excavations. The materials used to backfill these excavations appear to be relatively uncompacted 11595 SW Pacific Hwy based on our field observati(ns and measurements. The uncompacted materials probably will 11 of 36 111595 SW Pacific Hwy G e ,i E n g , v e e r s Filo No. 3040-J01-P16 13 of 36 1 1595 SVv Pacific Hwy G e iE n, g i n c r i File No. 3040•001-P361043093 G e o E n g i n e e r s3 File No. 3040-001-PJ61043093 Sof 36 1 Filo No. 3040-001 P36/043093 G r. o F n g i n c e r e 11595 SW Pacific Hwy 15 of 36 .1411.; 6o)ti En'giileers CONTENTS (Continued) 2. Obtain samples of the materials encountered in the test pits. Field Noreen the samples for settle more than the native materials under the weight of the proposed ottice building and, as a evidence tit petnoleurn-related contamination using visual examination. headspace vapor and result, there is a potential that detrimental differential settlements couid occur. To minimize the April 30, 1993 Geotechnical, Pace No, water sheen screening methods. potential for adverse diftzrenllal settlements, we recommend removing the uncumpacted materials Geoemirronrnental and APPENDIX a Laboratory Testing B-1 3. Classify the materials encountered in the test pits in general accordance with ASTNI tram the portions of the remedial excavations that are located within the building area and Geologic Services (American Society for Testing and �i:aerials) D2488. Maintain a detailed log of each hacktilling the resulting excavations with structural till. The following paragraphs present exploration. specific LoeoteLhnical recommendations for design and construction of the proposed development. Franceschi Properties APPENDIX B TABLES Tablg NQ. 3, Deterniin: the natural moisture content and dry density of selected Namples obtained from SITE PREPARATIONSummary of Mnisture Content Data B-1 the test pets. 600 3rd Street 5. Provide reconimendatixins tor site preparation. grading and drainage, stripping depths, fill The existing service station building• concrete flour slab and foundations, an to existing San Francisco. California 94107 type for any imported materials, compaction criteria, cut and till slope criteria. trench asphalt pavement should he removed from the site. Site utilities that will not be Incorporated into Attention: Mr. Kenneth A. Franceschi excavation and hacktill, site drainage, procedures for use of on-site sails• and wet/dry the proposed construction should he removed to a depth of at least 2 feet below the planned weather earthwork procedures. suhgrade elevation. GeoEngineers is pleased to submit three copies of our report of geotechnical engineering 6. Provide recommendations for design and construction of shallow spread foundations, The uncompacted materials should he removed from portions of the remedial excavations services for the proposed office building located at 11595 Southwest Pacific Highway in Tigard, including allowable design hearing pressure and minimum tooting depth and width. tilat are located within the huilding area. The base of the excavation should extend at least 1 tout Oregon. Our services have .jeep provided in accordance wi�'I the terms of our confirming 7. Estimate settlement pertiormance ut footings and the fluor slab for the design loadings. beyond the edge of the building for each I foot of excavation depth. Water contained within the agreement signed March 17, 1993. R Provide recommendations for construction of asphalt pavements for on-site access roads and excavation will require removal prior to hacktillin�t, the •.-xcavatiun. Uncompacted backfill We appreciate the opportunity to work with you. Please call if you have questions parking areas including subbase, base course and asphalt paving thicknesses. materials were observed generally in the vicinities of test pits TP-2, TP-4 and TP-7. e regarding this report or if we can be of further assistance. 9. Provide a written report summarizing the results of our geotechnical evaluation. resulting excavations should he backfilled with structural till as recommended in following s-ctions of this report. Yours very truly, ExCorps of Gresham, Oregon, removed the two hydraulic lifts and the service hay floor The hui)ding and pavement suhgrades should he pruofrolled with a half-loaded dump truck drain on Manch 31 , 1993. Petro:eum-related contamination was encountered in the excavations or similar heavy ruhher-tire construction equipment to identity any soft, loose or unsuitable areas. GeoEngineers, Inc. and our scope of services was increased to include: (1) observing the two Hydraulic lift and The pnxotnolling should he observed by one of our geotechnical engineer~ who will evaluate ST5_\ service bay floor drain excavations and (2) obtaining and submitting three soil samples (one from whether the pnurfrolling carnes excessive yielding of the ground surface• which may he indicative each excavation) for hydrocarbon 'dentitication and subsequent quantitation by DEQ laboratory of underlying soft or louse sail. If soft or loose zones are identified during pr(ulfruiling, these methods. One sample obtained from the, test pits excavated on March 26 also was submitted for areas should he excavated aid hacktilled with structural till. Scott V. Mills, P.E. analysis. Our observations and the results of the field screening and analytical testing are The test pit ex::avations were backfilled using relatively minimal cr.tropactive effort. Associate summarized in our letter dated April 30, 1993. Theretilre, soft spots should he expected at these locations. We recommend that these uncompacted soils be removed t;ora the test pits located within the proposed building and to a SVM:mIn tD: 3040001r.r depth of 3 feet in the payed areas. The resulting excavations should he backfilled with structure Document File No. ED: 01-036 SITE DESCRIPTION SURFACE CONDITIONS till. The materials used to backfill the excavations in the vicinity of the hydraulic lifts and floor cc: Mr. Dan Youngdrain should he removed and replaced with structural till. The site currently is occupied by a vacant service station building. Pumps and service Oregon Business Architecture, P.C. islands are not present. The site is covered with either asphalt concrete paving or gravel. Gravel Mr. Mike Foley is present at the ground surface in the vicinity of the remedial excavations. The site is relatively WET WEATHER CONSIDERATIONS Norris & Stevens Trafticahility of the site can he expected to be difficult (luring periods of rainfall or when flat and slopes downward inward the west. There is appmimately 5 feet of relief across the si.�. - p The site is hounded on the northwest by a thri t store, on the east by a Les Schwab Tire the surficial soils are a few percentage points above optimum moisture content. ,,'he.1 wet, die Center and the Tigard Fred Meyer parking lot, and on the southwest by Southwest Pacitic existing till material is susceptible to disturbance and generally provides inadequate support for GerrEn ncrn. Inc. highway. construction equipment. During wet weather or if wet ground conditions exist, proofrolling of the silty suhgrade should not be performed. The suhgrade should he evaluated by probing. Soils -5fH % Bridgeport Road Portland. OR(1-221 11595 SW Pacific Hwy 11595 SW Pacifir,H•,y Telephone 15011 6?+•93"a 12 of 36 1 50 5 SSW Pacific Hwy 16 of 36 36 rax 1503i 620•5Uu 11595 SW Pacific Hwy G c o F n K i n e e r s II File No. 3040-001-PJ61043093 2 File No 3040-WI-016/043093 c] o o E n i n e e r Filo No, 30411-001-P3h/04 Primed an remind CoW 10 of 36 if this notice appears clearer than the JUL 0 8 19% document, the doctrntent is of mart;inul quality. MICROFILMED I][III III JilI I�I�1�!(I�I�I i I�I�I�I�I;IfI I'i�i(IfIli,!{I�i f�iri�i�I�I�i ' ilill�!�I�Itl l I I�I�i 1�l�I�' t fji�;�iII�i�I I i�I�i�Ifl��ii I I�I�iilll(I�l�I I i�I�I�I�11Jj! l�Iji�l�I(I�!! n INC" MAGE of CHrri1► _ _. DE -�`— �- is _ ---------- --- ----- I ( r i r. r 'i lllilr111rlili, : 4IiI1IIIIIIIII1IIIIIIIII�II{111!Il�li !r p1,Hll�l��I ��i11i1lI��ry;il�ll,i1#1r1)i.�l!I!II!;l�ll;fiiMiloi1,i1� :G a , 1 I I I 1, -, - • ,,•� If 50 a_ _rP-%:�' 11 .•`•:,. c�,y .� ,f•°,+1i• . •• J• •C7 �I wale "' `�0I girt �h7 . ._ _' • ,• •�. .: _Y, • /''� . I W��iii,tttt�,TI FERRY ERY %EaQ�a, i '"' Irz^ � activities or soft or loose zones identified during "'' e6tl ural l nd d ' chat have been disturbed during site preparationfrequency and type of vehicles that will use fife area; however, we anticipate that traffic .•-A , oApCa probing should be removed and replaced with structural fill. conditions will consist primarily of automobiles. Based on these assumptions, it pavement sec[iun ��. ,. . `• C� ,r' �s. rim Duron periods of oat weather or if the soil at the site. remains wet at the ground surface, consisting of at least 2 1/2 inches of asphalt concrete over at least 6 inches of crushed rock should .� ,, -40 , MArknan a' g tis adequate. An increased thickness of crushe�j rock likely will be required if construction occurs s`h• imported ranular material will be necessary for construction staging areas, haul roads, be alley a layer of imp g •'' _ � ,y z material should during the rain season or when wet subgrade conditions exist. ! ' S?'�f• _ -�y and a working surface in the building area. Twelve inches of imported granular g y "r generally be sufficient for light staging areas and the basic building pad, but is generally not The asphalt concrete pavement should conform to Section 00745 ut the Standard -:: °` +. �` �; e e - - N•'�`_, , b i ,/fo ,Nve gen Y expected to be adequate to support heavy equipment or truck traffic. Haul roads and areas with Specifications for Highway Construction, Oregon State Highway Division, 1991 Edition, for light P 3 of these .. �c repeated heavy construct traffic should be constructed with a minimum of 18 inches of duty asphalt concrete. The aggregate base should conform to Section 0_6 V - 53 specifications. Aggregate base should be placed in one lift and compacted to not less than - - a o: A�x`�,✓ �.NE •wst imported granular material. The imported granular materia! should consist of crushed rock, crushed gravel or pit run 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determin xi by ASTM D 1557. --s-- f - �tt__�� '� •i •• sacci and gravel that is well graded between coarse and tine sizes, :-ontain nu deleterious materials - .a . S - �' have less than 8 weight passing the U.S. SITS DRAINAGE `• ' , .I�►'�n __,f-��' � ,-%*w:'�.y � e; •z� �, � `•inches, and ha percent by r' or articles larger than 3 �.dp r _� ;�I.i�1r'd _ _ SITE 1: P F� We recommend all roof drains be connected to a tightline leading to storm drain facilities. _ - Standard No. 200 Sieve.. '• t "� Pavement surfaces and open space areas should be sloped such that surface water runoff is ;\V a :"'.11; ; +. i't _ �- �' r• .� • collected and routed to suitable discharge points. We recommend that ground and paved surfaces :�; „ t _ ' : .✓• :,� '""'"1 �• j1�� S-. RUCTURAL FILL 3 t ~ -- ranular material building. • t' ' l '. ranular material or clean, adjacent to the building he sloped to drain away from the b �%'" "f. r' � '"'',t �. •\ . •+` ' �`•�' f imported g :<-, y "� �M. 3 \ L N�OM7fi.G'[� Structural rill should consist o p b ;, • ' removed from the remedial excavations. The on-site, fine-grained material (silt) also can be t't A�`' ��- used for structural till if it can be properly moisture conditioned. However, we anticipate that OBSERVATION OF CONSTRUCTION �� "�' r �`• v , L •� II depends, to a large degree, on quality �► ��*' - '! �-�• I -� content of these materi�.ls will be greater than that required for proper compaction Satisfactory foundation and earthwork performancep g g q =y Nti! g ,i : . 'I the moisture - - 6 difficult. Granular materials used for structural till should of construction. Sufficient monitoring of the Contractor's activities is a key part of determining ~ ` ,Qpm �' �� _ h f� •• I i a and that moisture conditioning will be diff _ consist of it or quarry nrn rock, crushed rock, or crushed gravel and sand that is fairly well that the work is completed in accordance with file construction drawings and specifications. We �:: - z %` ,� • � t_ h},try-' _ ' p . no clay balls, roots, organic matter and other deleterious recommend that GeoEngineers be retained to observe excavation and general till placement, and ' y e ° ,e z old ' -"'•�I graded between coarse and fine, containy g g P .. �y M:::• • a s_ v maximum article size of 3 inches, and have less than 5 percent passing the to review laboratory compaction and field moisture-density information. `�•�x. .�'•+� h I : ' al l materials, have a p ti U.S. Standard Nu. 200 Sieve. Subsurface conditions observed during construction should be compared with those �' > {• _ ' �' i • ••• '►- encountered during the subsurface exploration. Recognition of changed conditions often requires ` YL �� ."t..• �� hould be laced in lifts with a maximum uncompacted thickness of 12 inches .,A.oM The materials . p ' C r ` and compacted to not Iss than 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by experience; therefore, qualified personnel should visit the site with sufficient frequency to detect F . WAo ew. Y : �! J_ �'��.��, �• �. .� _ • — `' -- -� ` .rem ' TM D1557. During the wet season or when wet subgrade conditions exist, the initial lift if subsurface conditions change significantly from those anticipated. �•. :f.';. ;• s _.�r should be approximately 12 to 15 inches in uncompacted thicknzss and should be compacted by .°. •,•` i "0 rolling with a smooth dram, non-vibratory roller. LIMITATIONS 2 ••� o �,,/ °' W��- 'u well e b Eranceschl Pro ernes and other members r` its ; �� :Bonita - • " 'ti Trench backfill for the utility pipe base and pipe zone should co•isist of graded We have prepared this report for us y p granular material with a maximum particle size of 3/4 inch and less than 8 percent passing the design and construction team for the proposed commercial development. The data and repot U.S. Standard No. 200 Sieve. The material should be free of clay balls, roots, organic matter, should be used for bidding or estimating purposes, but our report, conclusions, and 0 2000 4000 and other deleterious materials. Backfill for the pipe base and pipe zone should be compacted interpretations should not be construed as warranty of the subsurface ( onditions. CC.AL.E IN FEET y to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D 1557 or as Test pit observations indicate soil conditions only at those specific locations and only to the m recommended by the pipe manufacturer. Within building and paved areas, trNnch backfill above depths penetrated. They do not necessarily reflect soil types, strata thio knessts or water level Referen s. USGS 7 5' topographic quadrangle maps, variations that may exist between explorations. If subsurface conditions differing from those 'Beaverton• OR' photorevised 1984 End the pipe zone should be compacted as recommended far structural till. In all other areas, trench y p •Lake Oswego. CIR' phocorevtsed 1964 backfill above the pipe zone should be compacted to 92 percent. described are noted during the course of excavation and construction, reevaluation will be necessary. VICINITY MA `a' � 11595 SW Pacific Hwy 11595 SW Pacific Hwy Geo� pEngineers 19036 FIGURE 1 17 of 36 t; a E n n t r 5 Fila No.3040.001-P36/043093 r/ e o E n 4 i in e c r y 7 Fila No.3040.001-P'I6/043093 11595 SW Pacific Hwy 21 of 36 SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS if there are changes in the grades, location, configuration or type of construction for the We recommend supporting the structures on cont wall or isolated column tCotings buildings, the conclusions and recommendations presented may not be applicable. If design t we be retained to review our conclusions and recommendations rounded on the undisturhed native stiff to very stiff silt or on structural till. All footings should changes are made, we request tha he proportioned for a maximum allowable soil hearing pressure of 2,000 psf(pounds per square and to provide a written modification or verification. foot). This hearing pressure is a net hearing pres.-ure and applies to the total of dead and long- Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in term live loads and may he increased by one-third when considering earthquake or wind loads. accordance with generally accepted practices in this area at the time the report was prepared. No The weight tifthe footin- and any overlying backfill can he ignored in calculating footing loads. other conditions, express or implied, should be understood. We recommend that isolated column and continu 'is wall footings have minimum widths of 24 and 18 inches. respectively. The bottom of exterior footings should be founded at least 18 inches below th- lowest adjacent ?rade, and interior footings at least i'_ inches below the top We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project. If you have questions of the floor Blahs. Total settlement of footings, founded as recommended, is anticipated to be less than 1 inch. concerning this report or if we can provide additional services, please call. Differential sett ement between adjacent. comparably loaded column footings can be expectea to Yours very truly, he less than 1/2 inch. GeoEngineers, Inc. FLOOR SLABS p� Satisfactory subgrade support for building floor slabs supporting up to 150 psf areal loading i � G E `•t1,0� can he obtained provided the building subgrade area is prepared as d escribed previously. At least ��~�� t1 t-P 6 inches of free-draining granular material should separate the base of the floor slab from the Dixie A. Simon, P.E. existing silty materials to form a capillary break. The granular material .ru;Lid be similar to the Project Engineer material used for the footing granular pads and shuold tie placed in one lift and compacted as r�r�vad b,t.22. structural fill. IE A t1N Settlement of floor slabs supporting the anticipated design luaus and constructed as recommended is not ex ected to exceed 1/2 inch. reg p Scott V. Mills, P.E. Associate RESISTANCE 10 SLIDING Lateral loads on footings can be resister.; by passive earth pressure on the sides of footings DAs:SVM:Mh1 and by friction on the base of the footings. Our analysis indicates thct the available passive earth DocumentM: 3040001r.r pressure for footings confined by structural till or for footings constructed in direct contact with Copyright Q 1993 GeoEngineers,tw., A1I rights teaerved the native matArials is 250 pcf (pounds per cubic too'.) equivalent fluid pressure. Adjacent floor slabs, pavements, or the upper 12-inch depth of adja--tit, unpaved areas should not he considered when calculating passive resistance. A coefficient (if friction equal to 0.35 for the granular soil to complete interface may be used when calculating resistance to slitting. The recommended lateral earth pressure arid coefficient of friction values include a factor of safety against failure of th,s soil of at least 1.5. I i PAVEMENT DESIGN RECOMMENDATION The pavement subgrade should be prepare(] in accordance with the previcusly described site preparation and structural till recommendations. We do not have specific information on the 11595 SW Padffc Hwy 20 of 36 rj File No 3040-001-P36/043093 G e o E n g i n a c r s $ File No. 3040-001-P3fi/043093 11595 SW Pacific,Hwy 18 of 36 if this notice appears clearer th:ur thJUL o s 1s9se '� docttntellf, file document is of tit; ri,,inal tinarf,'. ;�11CROhILMED !!jljil!jl {I{I !{I{Ijliljljl j Ij!jljl�!(Ijt l {Ijljl�l�ljl� 1 ljljijljljl I lyljI;lel;ij! ! !j! l I�!{!{! i'Ijljljl�I{ill ! I{i{Ij11 I ill{� ! 111!1 11 Ijljljl�l{lj! � lNGN iLMAOr: CN 1�/ lti� — �_ �1� -- -, .. _ 1-- -- 'i3" 1 t !!i{IIIIIIIIIjI►!IIlIII{illIilllll!1!`hill{llir�111lj11ltllill�!I!lllli!�!!U iilfilflllilll{1}li If!I�Illlllll1�11P! tli!IIII11?I',i�li]lili!t11111 1lii�llH11111�111rllliiltilil�l!!fNl3lL!!�I1NNi;;{Hfiofli►{i'•1lliili!'!�i tlll�!I'.�'?;1�Rllllllf�"ii1!lid 11! Ill;l!f1111111'�!I111tH1�111�ltt 1 = ova N 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET St��StO�e Proposed 'I Building-.., 1 EXPLANATION TP-1 - TEST P(T APPRO)OMATE UMTTS OF I RWEDIAL EXCAYATKNJ FROM REFERENCED Property Line-, �� LesSchwab TOPOGAAPI•iIC TP-8�i / �. \ � \ wrab / Tire Center kN TP--a TP-5 Proposed ,\ Parking Area TP-1 , TP--4 � �� aye g y, TP-3 s / 1P-2�/ Tigard Fred Meyer Parking Area bA References-. Drawing entitled 'Rwag Bui►d,n, 11595 S::'. Pacific Highway, Tigard, Oregon.' by Oregon Business Architecture P C. and drawing entitled ` 'Topographical Survey Map,' elated 01/13/92, by W&H Pacif;c g'i1+: SIT. PLAN GCo • � —En ineer•s � 11595 SW Pacific Hwy FIGURE 2 22 of 3b If (his notice .1lrpears Clearer 111.111 the Jul- p 8 1998 document, the document is of marginal yn:iliily. N1111CROI 11,NILD fly11111a _ i lift I i�ihnt ti;� ttifi1 + tt �iclru nlllr�r Illl�it�t iilllltn tit�h�ni��' »Itl�tn lith ; . ,' ; tr its . gin tittrnl IIIItPN2 4X LOG OF TEST PITS LOG OF TEST PITS DEPTH BELOW SOIL GROUP PENETRATION DEPTH BELOW SOIL GROUP PENETRATION GROUND SURFACE CLASSIFICATION RESISTANCE GROUND SURFACE CLASSIFICATION RESISTANCE Ifeetl' SYMBOL list), DESCRIPTION _ Ifeetl' _- SYMBOL (tall' DESCRIPTION _ _ SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM v TEST Prf TP-2 TFT PIT TP44 Appro um ac elevation: 253.5 feet -- - "- - Approximate elevation- ?5•t . `ect GROUP GROUT' NAME MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP 0.0- 0.6 GP Coarx gavel with fine w medium sand and trace silt (loose, ).0• 0.5 OP Brown coarse gravel with mediutrt 10 file sand(loose,dry)(fill) dry)(fill) GRAVEL CLEAN GRAVEL GW WELL-GRADED GRAVEL,FINE TO COARSE COARSE GRAVEL - 0 5 t 5 SP Brown fine sand with trete silt tmed,um stiff, moist) tfill) 0.5- 2.0 ML Brownsilt with trace sand and gravel(medium suffiostiff.mo„t GRAINED GP POORLY-GRADED GRAVEL ' to wet) (rill) l 0 Dr) density = IU_ 5 pcf, moisture = _U 0�. SOILS MORE THAN 50% GRAVEL GM SILTY GRAVEL OF COARSE FRACTION WITH FINES 1.5- 3.5 ML Brown silt with Ince sand(very stiff, moist) (fill) 1 0 3.0 RETAINED ON NO. 4 SIEVE GC CLAYEY GRAVEL Is Dry density - 102.5 pcf, moisture = 20.396' MORE THAN 60% _�- �_ 3.S 5.0 GP Red-brown.verse gravel with medium to fine sand ar.d trace 14ETAINCO ONSAND CLEAN SAND $W WELL-GRADEU SAND, FINE TU silt(louse to medium dense,wet) (fill) 2.0 1.5 APPENDIX A, NO. 200 SIEVE COARSE SAND Test pitcumpleud u 5 0 feet on 0312W93 SP POORLY-GRADED SAND 'I 4 6.5 ML Brown silt with trace sate and gravel faufl, moist to wet)(fill) MORE THAN 601 SAND SM SILTY SANU - Disturbed samples obtained at 1.5, 3.0 and 5.0 ieet 3.0 05 Of COARSE FRACTION WITH FINES PASSES Rapid ground rater seepage observed at 3 0 feet NO. 4 SIEVE SC CLAYEY SAND 3.3 0 25 --- -- Severe caving observed below 3.0 feet 4.0 05 SILT AND CLAY ML SILT FINE INORGANIC 6.3 - 8.5 GP drawn coarse gravel w;th rime to medium sand and trace silt GRAINED CL CLAY (loose, wet) (fill) SOILS LIQUID LIMIT LESS THAN 50 ORGANIC OL ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY Test pit completed at 8.3 feet on 03/26/93 SILT AND CLAY MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY ELASTIC SILT D!swrticd sample obtained at 4.0 feel MORE THAN 50♦ INORGANIC -- "- PASSES NO. 200 SIEVE CH CLAY OF HIGH PI ASTICITV, TAT CLAY Moderate ground water seepage at '_ 0 and 3 5 feet LIQUID LIMIT 50 OR MORE ORGANIC GH ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC, SILT Heavy ground water seepage at A 5 feet HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT :AT Moderate caving observed below 6.0 feet NOTES: SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS 1. Field classification is based on Dry - Absence of moisture, dusty, dry visual examination of soil in general to the touch accordance with ASTM D2488-84. Moist - Damp, but no visible water 2. Soil classification using laboratory tests is based on ASTM 02487-85. Wet - Visible free water or saturated, usually soil is obtained from 3. Descriptions of soil density or below water table consistency are bayed on interpretation of Glowcount data, 'THE DEPTHS ON THE TEST PIT LOGS, ALTHOUGH SHOK'N TO 0.1 FOOT, ARE BASED ON AN AVM,.GE OF visual appearance of soils, and/or THE DEPTHS ON THE TEST PiT LOGS, ALTHOUGH SHOWN TO 0.1 Fcx7T, ARE BASED ON AN AVERAGE OF MEASUREMENTS ACROSS THF,TEST PIT AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE )0.5 FOOT. TEST PrrS WERF test data. MEASUREMENTS ACROSS THE TEST PIT AND SHOULD BE CONSIDEPXD A4Ct)RATETO 0.5 FCX)T•. TEST PRS WEF,F. BACYX-ILLED Wi17H EXCAVATED MATERIAL UPON COMPLETION. BACKFILLED WITH EXCAVATED MATERIAL UPON COMPLETION. 'I ENETRATiON RESISTANCE MEASURED IN THE FIELD USING A POCKET PENETROMETER. TSF -TONS PER SQUARE 'PENETRATiON RESISTANCE MEASURED IN THE FIELD USING A POCKET PENETROMETER. TSF -TONS PER SQUARE FOOT FOOT 'IN-SITU DRY DENSITY AND MOISTURE CONTENT MEASURED USING A'TROXLE-R 341 1-B NUCLEAR DENSITY GAUGE. 'IN-SITU DRY DENSITY AND MOISTURE CONTENT MEASURED USING A TROXLER 3411-B NUCLE.\R DENSrrY GAUGE PCF - POUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT, % - PERCENT WF d POUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT, % - PERCENT r SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM l {11' LOG OF TEST PIT � . � LOG OF TEST PIT m �� G� ��' Geo��F.ngineers s- Geo�,pl✓ngineers FIGURE A-5 W Geo Nm Eno ine rs FIGURE A�-1 �� FIGURE A-3 c� 11595 SW Pacific Hwy 115S SW Pacific Hwy 11595 SW Pacific Hwy 29036 23 of 36 11595 SW Pacific Hwy 27 of 36 25 of 36 LOG OF TEST PITS LOG OF TEST PITS LOG OF TEST PITS DEPTH BELOW SOIL GROUP PENETRATION DEPTH BELOW SOIL GROUP PENETRATION DFPTH BELOW SOIL GROUP PEt,FTRATION APPENDIX A GROUND SURFACE CI.ASSirICAT10N RESISTANCE GROUND SURFACE CLASSIFICA110N RESISTANCE- ^� ^ '- GROUND SURFACE Cl OSSIFICATION - NeSIS1ANCE ` Ifeetl' SYMBOL Itsflr DESCRIPTION (feet)' - SYMBOL _ -Itsf)' DESCRIPTION Ifeetl' SYMBOL Its/)' DESCRIPTION TEST PLT_TPJ i F 5T PIT TP-t TF5T PIT Tri FIELD EXPLORATIONS Approximate elevation 2�5 '1 sect Approximate elevation. 1.51.4 feel Approximate<lewuan 253 0 feet The subsurface conditions at the site were explorers by excavating eiglit rest pits at the Coarse 0.0- 0.2 AC Asphalt concrete 0.0• 0.2 GP e gravel with fine to medium sand and trace silt (loose, 0 0- 0.5 GP Brown coarse gravel.vith tine to medium sand(lcx�sc,dry)(fill) approximate locations shown in Figure 2. The test pits were e-cavated on April 26, 1993 by dry)(fill) 0.5 - I s ML city sell (veh' Buff, moil)(fill) C&H Excavating of Clackamas, Oregon, using a rubber-tire backhoe. The test pits were 0.2- 0 5 GP Brown gravel with sand and trace silt (fill) ° : • 2.0 ML Brown silt with Ince fine sand (very stiff, moist) (fill) excavated to depths ranging between 5.0 and 13.0 feet below the ground surface. The density i3 s 2 0 NIL Gra, silt with trace organics(stiff, m0is11 1 ° 4.0 - of the in-situ materials was measured at selected locations and depths using a nuclear density 1.3 s Dry density - 102.3 pcf, moisture Brown silt (stiff, moist) = 21.296' 1.5 1.5 - 4.0 M X 5 gauge in accordance with ASTM D2922. The results of the density testing are summarized on 2.0- 6.0 a.5 L MIL end gray mottled silt (stiff, moist) 2.0 2.0 2 0 Dry density ■� 92.1 pcf, moisture = 25.3'L,' the test pit logs. All field activities were observed by a staff engineer from GeoEngineers. 2.0- 4.0 ML Gray sat (surf to very stiff, moist) (fill) 3.0 I.s Materials encountered in the test pit excavations were classified in the field in general 2.5 2.0 3.0 3.0 4.0- 6.0 ML. Gray silt(medium stiff to at,ff, moist) accordance with ASTM D2488, tale Standard Practice for the Classification of Soils (Visual- 3.5 2.0 4 0- 11 0 ML Brown silt (medium stiff to stiff. moist) Manual Procedure), which is described in Figure A-1. Disturbed soil samples were obtained 55 Color grades to red-brown 4° 1.5 40 , 5 from the test pit excavations for moisture content testing in our materials testing laboratory. 6 0- 11 0 ML Red-brown silt with trace fine sand (stiff, moist to wet) S.0 1.0 Soil classifications and sampling intervals are shown in the test pit logs in Figures A-2 s.s trades to red-brown(medium stiff, moist) A U ML Grades cared-brown mottled gray 6.0- 12.5 M1. Red-brown silt with Ince to some send (medium stiff, moist/ through A-8. Laboratory testing results are included in Appendix B. 90 Grades to c with trace fin sans , I l 5 Grades with hart!layers of ted-brown silt Test pit completed a 11,0 feet on 03/26197 i0,5 Grades to brown and gray mottled Test pit completed at 12.5 feet an 03/2693 Test pit :ampleted:, 13.0 feet on 03/26/93 Disturbed samples obtained at 1.0,4.5, 9 0 and I I A feet Disturbed samples obuincy at 1.5,3.5 7.0, 8.0 and 13.0 fret Disturbed samples obtained at 3.0, 4.5,7.3 and 12.5 fret No ground water seepage observed Slow ground water seepage observed at 6.0 feet No ground water seepage observed No caving observed No caving observed No caving observed 'THE DEPTHS ON THE TEST PIT LOGS, ALTHOUGH SHOWN TO 0.1 FOOT, ARE BASED ON AN AVERAGE OF 'THE DEPTHS ON THE TEST PrT LOGS, ALTHOUGH SHOWN TO O.l FOOT, ARE BASED ON AN AVERAGE OF THE DEPTHS ON THE TEST PR LOGS, ALTHOUGH SHOWN TO 0.1 FOOT', ARE BASED ON AN AVERAGE OF MEA.tURFMENT'S ACROSS THE TEST PTT AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATETO 0.5 FO OT. TEST PITS WERE MEASUREMENTS ACROSS THE TEST PR AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO 0.5 FOOT. TEST PITS WERE MEASUREMENTS ACROSS THE TEST PIT AND SHOULD BE CONSIDF�ZED \CG'URATE TO 0.3 FOOT. TEST PRS WERE BACKFILLED WTI H EXCAVATED ST PI AN UPON LD BECOMIPCO iON. BACKFILLED WITH EXCAVATED MATERIAL UPON COMPLETION. BACKFELLED WITH EXCAVATED MATERIAL UPON COMPLETION. 'PENETRATION RESISTANCE MEASURED IN THE FIELD USING A POCKET PENETROMETER TSF s TONS PFR SQUARE 'PENETRATION RESISTANCE MEASURED iN THE FiELD USMG A POCKET PENETROMETER. TSF -TONS PER SQUARE 'PENETRATION RESISTANCE MEASURED IN THE FIELD USING A POCK1=T PENETROMEi ER. TSF=TONS PEE.SQUARE FOOT FOOT FOOT G A TROXLER 3411-B NUCLEAR 'IN-SITU DRY DENSITY AND MOISTURE CONTENT MEASURED USINR DENSITY GAUGE. 'IN-SrrU DRY DENSITY AND MOISTURE CONTENT MEASURED USING A TROXLER 3411-B NUCLEAR.DENSITY GAUGE ! 'IN c�DRY DENSITY AND rAOISTURE CONTENT'MEASURED iISiNG A TROXLER 3411•B NUCLEAR DENSrrY GAUGE. PCF - POUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT, % - PERCENT PCF - POUNDS PFR CUBiC FOOT, % - PERCENT PCF = POUNDS PER CUBiC FOOT, % - PERCENT ts. LOG OF TEST PIT i��l,. LOG OF TEST PIT LUG OF TEST PIT 24o�38WPac8icHwy @Q ��ngineelS Gcolq'Engineers FIGURE A-4 GeOI Wk ow;III ��Fn�jineE'I'S FIGURE A-2 \�/ a FIGURE A-6 G e t. F n g i n < e r a A - )< File No. 3040-001-P36/043093 11595 SW Pacific Hwy 11595 SV^/Pacific Hwy 11595 SW Pttrlflc Hwy 30 of 36 26 of 36 28 of 36 r I if this notice .11)1)e;trs clearer flia.] lite JUL 0 8 i998 docunfent, the docillnent is of nulrpinni qul:iit.y. MIC110FILMED _ a• INCH t�i►;A!n!!oI!ILL'HII1tI8IA f�l�i��i!�,l.�if!.l�Iil .,,,te„•_!'i il11lIi11,1l1,lItIIIIIIII . „tIil►1}1l,►1'lllllt�ll,r lillt l�1 ii!0111t-lil l I_i All �1lIll! T_rj, Ishii Laid l 24XDE , II. �iI;h4:,i lillli4li li,.11il,�,lllliill{iii4 1• �I11,.,,1..1;.,,.l,l�I,! 1 I,��° tema. LOG OF TEST PITS LOG OF TEST PITS DEPTH BELOW SOIL GROUP PENETRATION FDEPTHOW SOIL GROUP PENETRATION GROUND SURFACE CLASSIFICATION RESISTANCE GROUND SURFACE CLASSIFICATION RESISTANCE Ifeatl' SYMBOL (tail' DESCRIPTION APPENDIX B Ifeat)' SYMBOL Itst), DESCRIPTION TES PIT TP-13 TEST Prr TP LABORATORY TESTING Approximate elevation: 252.5 feet Apptvsimata elevation: 249.8 feet All sampli;s obtained from the test pits were visually examined to confirm or modify field 0 0- 0 4 AC Asphali concrete 0.0- 0.4 AC Asphalt concrctc classifications. All soil samples were tested to determine their natural moisture content in 0.4- 1.0 GP Brown coarse gravel with fine to medium sand and trace silt accordance with ASTM D2216. The results of the laboratory testing are presented in Table B-1. 0 4 0 8 GP Red-brow,'coarse gravel with fine to medium sand and tra.e (medium dense,moist)(fill) slit imedrum dense. moist)(fill) 1 0 - 2.0 ML Brown silt with sand and gravel(stiff, moist) (Iia) 0 8 8.5 ML Gray silt with trace organics 1 5 1.5 2 0 3.5 Dry density - 107.8 pcf, moisture = 22.4%' 2.0- 3.0 M1. Gray silt(very stiff, moist) 2 S I.5 - 5 3.5 4 0 2.5 3 0 12 0 ML Brown silt with trace sand (medium stiff to stiff, moist) Test pit completed at 8.5 feet on 03/26193 Disturbed samples obtained at 3.0 and 8.5 feet A 0 Grades to with sand Moderate ground water seepage observed at 6.5 feet J Grades to brown and gray molded No caving observed Ter:pit completed ai 12.0 feet on 03/26/93 Disturbed samples obtained at 3.0, 8.0 and 12.0 feet t Slight ground water seepage observed at 8.5 feet No caving observed 'THE DEPT HS ON THE TEST Prr LOGS, ALTHOUGH SHOWN TO 0 1 FOOT. ARE BASED ON AN AVERAGE OF 'THE DEPTHS ON THE TEST PIT LOGS, ALTHOUGH SHOWN TO 0.1 FOOT, ARE BASED ON AN AVERAGE OF NIEASI IREMENIS ACROSS THE TEST PIT AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO 0.5 FOOT. TEST PITS WERE MEASUR0s1ENTS ACROSS THE TEST PIT AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCU`kAT'ETO 0.5 FOOT. TEST PITS WERE BACKFILLED WITH EXCAVATED MATERIAL.UPON COMPLETION. BACKFILLED WITH EXCAVATED MATERIAL UPON COtAPLETTON. 'PENETRATION RESISTANCE MEASURED IN THE FIELD USING A POCY.Er PENETROMETER. TSF-TONS PER SQUARE 'PENETRATION RESISTANCE MEASURED IN THE FIELD USING A POCKET PENETROMETER. TSF -TONS PER SQUARE FOOT LOOT 'IN-SITU DRY DENSrTY AND MOISTURE CONTENT MEASURED USING A TROXLER 341 I-B NUCLEAR DF-NSTfY GAUGE. 'IN-SrTU DRY DENSITY AND MOISTURE CONTENT MEASURED USING A TROXLER 341 I-B NUCLEAR DENSITY GAUGE PCF - FOUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT, % v PERCENT PCF - POUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT, % - PERCENT i/<<�• LOG OF TEST PIT / LOG OF TEST PIT Il ()��En I Il��l�� ----- Geo��Engineers 355 f 36W Pacific Hwy K%14 0, � FIGURE A-7' FIGURE A-4 11595 SW Pacific Hwy 11595 SW Pacific,Hwy Cie E n g n c e r a B - 1 Fil No 3040-001 P36/043093 31 o136 33 of 36 1 LOG OF TEST PITS DEPTH BELOW SOIL,GROUP PENETRATION GROUND SURFACE CLASSIFICATION RESISTANCE (feet!' SYMBOL (tel)' DESCRIPTION TAEaLE 1 SUMMARY OF MOISTURE CONTENT DATA T FST PIT TP-7 Approximate elevation: 253.0 feet Depth of Moisture 0.0- 0.5 GP Brown coarse gravel with Gree to medium sand and silt Qoese, Test Sample Soil CO' tent moist)(fill) Pit (feet) Type' (percent) 0 5 . 10.0 GP Red-bmwngravel with fine to medium sand and silt it lose,moist TP-1 1.5 NIL 233 to wet) (rill) 3.5 ML 331 3 q Dry density 107.3 per, moisture 8. ML 29.3 16.7%' i 8.0 ML 30.7 3.5 Grades to with cobbles 13.0 I _ ML � 28 9 /.5 Grades to cobbles with gravel,ince silt TP-2 1.5 SP 20.1 APPENDIX B � I 3.0 ML 15.6 Test pit completed at 10.0 feet on 03126/935.0 I 5.0 _ GP _ 15.9 _ T--P--3 1.0 ML -- +-- 15.9 r Disturbed sample obtained at 3.0 feet 4,5 I ML 31.0 8.0 ML 31 9 Crab sample obtained at 10.0 feet 11.0 _ ML _i 31 2 TP-4 4.0 ML 20.2 Rapid ground water seepage observed at 5.0 feet L -� ^� - 1 P•5 I 3.0 ML �� 23.6 Sever caving observed below 4.0 feel 4.5 I ML 32.3 7.5 I! ML 29.1 I ------- 12.5 _ ML _ 32.5 r' TP•6 3.0 -`` -- ML - 28.7 _ 8.5 I _ ML _--1---- 32.1 TP-7 l 3.0 GP 14.6 100 G P�--- _9.2 TP4 i 3.0 ML _..- 25.3 8.0 ML 31.7 12.0 I _ ML 32.2___ 'Description of soil classification is included in Figure A-1 P 'THE DEPTHS ON THE TEST PIT L0<13, ALTHOUGH SHOWN TO 0.1 FOOT, APE BASED ON AN AVERAGE OF MEASUR WENTS ACROS'i THE TEST Prr AND SHOULD BE CONSIDEReD ACCURATE TO 0.5 FOOT. TEST PIT'S WERE BACKF[LL.ED WrTH EXCAVATED MATERIAL UPON COMPLETION. 'PENETR,.i K)14:ESLST'ANCE MEASURED IN THE FIELD USING A POCKET PENETROMEj . TSF-TONS PFR SQUARE FOOT 'IN-ITU DRY DENSITY AND MOISTURE CONTENT MEASURED USING A TROXLER 341 I-B NUCLEAR DENSrTY GAUGE. PCF FOUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT, % - PERCENT LOG OF TEST PIT Uec)\ 0,00Engineei-, FIGURE A-8 11595 SW Pacifir,Hwy 11595 SW Pacific Hwy - 11595 SW Pacific Hwy 32036 34 of 36 36 of 36 If this notice 1ppenrs etc:u•:?t• 1111,111 the JUL o s IM doctimeiit„ the doctlnient is of marginal quolit.y. MICROFTI.N ED 1!!jifi�� 11"M (j MADE Al CH INS'�� (I�IIlIIiIII�INl�lI(I�lllf�llllflit!!IHt�1H1!llll�lll�lfll�!!1!I',lll�!llll4iil�!it411't!�!!!f !I}l�!!1!Iltf!iillllilit�iltiliEEi�litfl6ill�Ii111ii(i�Iitt11#!i{li!►11lll�lif!!"'l�fb►',�}f!!�1llt ttil�HiiEltH�l;ll{10!1�ItIliU11�{!1{l;)il�iti{�Illl�flli�!t11�11�{�lif{�fSll{lill�lltl(INt�liflt!' 24X Y � N ADDRESS: s la-c' Q is\records\microfilm\t zrgets\building.doc INSPECTION NOTICE City of Tigard Building Departaent 13125 SN Ball Blvd. Tiqard, Oregon 97223 Inspection Line (Rec-4-Phone): 639-4175 Business Phone: 639-4171 Inspection:__ ,_ rooting Plbg. Underelab Hoch. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk Round. Plbg. Top Out Gas Trine FINALi Post/beam Struct. San. Sewer Framing -Bldg. Poet/Ream Hoch. Rain Drain Insulation -Plumb. Plbg. Underfloor Nater __Line Gyp. Bd. -mech. Date Requesteds_ LA - CC ` 9 Address:A.1y C c- , Perm11 �1- 0035 BulidersP , l JC-D . ao THE FOLLONINO CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED:," Inspector: i_ Date:_!_v __APPROVED _ DISAPPROVED APPROVED SUBJECT TO --i-- ABOVE __Call For Reinep. INSPECTION NOTICE City of Tigard Building Department 13125 aw Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Inspection Line (Rec-O-Phone): 639-4175 Business Phone: 639-4171 Inspection:___________ Footing Plbg. Underslab Mech. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk Found. Plbg. Top Out Gas Line PINALi Pn�'/Beam Struc-t. San. Sewer Framing -Bldg. -'.t/beam Mech. Rain Drain Insulation -Plumb. Plbg. Underflecr Water Line Gyp. Bd. -Mech.-.) (f i Dc; Requeated: AH 1�` ! //PM Permit 1tf �L �e �r�l /Tw 7 Builder:- THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: Inspectors Date: APPROVED DISAPPROVE. APPROVED SDBJEC1 To ABOVE WCall Par Reinsp. Lf-R1 I F I CATE OF OLUPAN CITY OF TICARD PET RMI #. . C. . . . . a CY BIJP93-1012' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATF' ISSUED: 03/18/94 13125 SW Hall Blvd.Tigard,Oregon 97223-8199 (503)639-4171 S c 11"C ,AVDRESS. . . 1 1595 SW PCIC TrIC' 14WY SURD IVISION. . . . ZONING:C-6 BLOCK. . . . . . ,, . . . .I LOT. . . . . . . . . . . . . CLA!35 OF WORK. NEW TYPE OF UUF. . . :COM OCCUPANCY GRP. xS2 OCC1JPAN4.,'Y LOAD: 171P TENANT NAME. . . tFRONCESCHI Remarks: Vvaricpilichi Property - new retail sal.es building (furniture) . Only part of eaot wail ). is I -hr fire rated. Storm drain credits applied from deme permit FIROPERTIES &oo 'ri-iIRD sTREFT Mddre,55 SAN FRANCISCD C(.4 '.'141.107 Fra h 0 (,s Ch I raw Ptl 0 rie #- Selli COW V'artol' : YORK(-'.- -1 CURT V, loit-15 Sw PF'Ak11. Ur;lN HWY 03 Bf:.'(IVF:.RTON OR `3100 , Phone #a 646 2 Rey 0. . - 55644 Occ..kk pa T)r,y of t0 e a b(-v e refer c n c,ed b u j. J cl i n tj i s hereby t4 i v e n, A n d c!0 r t i f i e the compliance v-vith the State OF Oreqon Sp@c�i,-,Ity Codes for the groi.,p, occupanuy, and uic.- under whirti the l,-ffeVr'p - '.�Lk 0 d. pet'Mit l,), . FIRE DEPARTMENT I MS T OR B I L L7F CIAL POST IN PLACE ECT ON NOTICE city of Tigard Building Deportment 13125 SA Ball Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 977.23 Inspection Line (Rec-O•-Phone)s 639-4175 9usinens Phon1 539-4171 Inspect l.ont_ _____ footing Plbg. Underelah Mach. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk Found. Plbg, Top Out Gas Line FINALt Pont/Beam Struct. Sao. Sewer Framing �Bldgs Post/Beam Mach. Rai. , Drain Insulation -Plumb. Plbg. Underfloor 2 Nater Lina Gyp. Bd. Date !lequeetedt_ J /0 �/ Lz r/T�i�me:! AM/� Addrene:� ;�5 , Builder:_ THE FOLLOW INU COR1l MOSS AM It WXRSDt Inspector:__ v 'natal << _ AFPROVED DISAPPROVED :14PPROVIt!) SUP,IECT TO ABOVE Call Fo:c Reinsp. INSPECTION NOTICE - City of Tigard Building Department 13125 SW Ball Blvd. Tigard. Oregon 97223 Inspection Line (Roc-0-Phone): 639-4175 Busincas Phone: 639-4171 Inspection:_ ,_ � rooting Plbg. Underolab Mech. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk Found. Plbg. Top Out Gas Line FINALS Foot/Beam Struct. San. Sewer Framing -Bldg. Poet/Bevin Mech. Rain Drain Insulation Plttmb. ' Plbg. Underfloor WAI er Line /r� Gyp. Bd. -Mech. Date Requested: � ( Times {SAN PM Address � �� ` 7th. Permit 1t ) ✓ C Builder: LX 4, 1.5 L_L(& . 212 3 THE FOLLOWING CORRE-7TIONS ARE RRQUIREDt 42 ! T - - Inepecto Date: --APPROVED _ DIS,,PPROVRD � APPROVED SUBJECT To ABOVE Call For Reinap. SIGN PERMIT PERMIT #: SCN94-0035 DATE ISSUED. . . . : 03/04/94 EXPIRATION DATE: (-)GpLt/qL` PARCEL. . . . . . . . . : 1S136DB-00 ZONE. . . . . . . . . . . . C-G BUSINESS NAME. . : SLEEP-N-AIRF SIGN LOCATION. . : 11595 SW PACIFIC H-1 APPLICANT/AGENT: DAN OSTERMAN BUSINESS TAX NO: SIGN: PERMANENT (X) FREESTANDING (X) FREEWAY ( ) TEMPORARY ( ) WALL ( ) ELECTRONIC ( ) OTHER ( ! BILLBOARD ( ) BALLOON ( ) SIGN DIMENSIONS. . . . . . : 416" X 15'6" TOTAL SIGN AREA. . . . . . : 70 sq. ft. WALL AREA. . . . . . . . . . . . . sq. ft. WALL FACE (DIRECTION) : NA SIGN HEIGHT. . . . . . . . . . : 20 ft. PROJECTION FROM WALL. : in. ILLUMINATION. . . . . . . . . : IN`i' DESCRIPTION OF SIGN: PERMANENT FREESTANDING SIGN. Dimensions: 416" X 1516" = 69.75 square f MATERIALS. . . . . . . . . . . . : ALUM/LEXAN EXISTING SIGNS. . . . . . . : ELECTRICAL PERMIT REQUIRED: YES BUT'nING PERMIT REQUIRED. . : YES ADMINISTRATIVE EXCEPTIONS. : N/A PERMIT FEE: $ 25.00 APPROVED BY: --- DATE: 03/04/94 Fut No. (Mly OF TIGARD SIGN rE1RMrr APPLICATION The applicant hereby applies for a peiuiit for the work .indicated or as shown in the accompanying ply and s-pecificaticuzs. SIGN IOCA7•ICU ADCRESS: 11595 sw PACIF11C HIGHWAY ZOUJNG: GC _ NAME OF BUSIEIFSS: SLEEP-N-A I R E__ APPIJCANr/AGFN>'. DAN OSTERMAN — MANY: HEATH SIGNS Fj-IJi1E: 232-2620 The aty of fiigard imposes an annual Busiriess Z'ay which mist be kept current on all pex-}Cm doing busine-z;s in the City. Do you presentlur have a u=ent lusi.rnss tar.? YES (XNO ( U.L. Label f AVAILABLE UPON MFG./JNSTALL PWpOS,D SIGN: (ChedJ as many as apply) - PFImU41N" (- )' FRg MNDING �SIC ( ) TF�'OFum ( WAIL OWER ( ) BIIZF3Cu1R2D ( ) BAUDON ( ) SIGN DIMENSIONS: �' _ `' � -_-- E)CP 7 ON DATE: JUM SIGN AREA (Sq. Ft.j � — WALL AREA (Sq. Ft.) : .�— WAIT, FACE: __ _ _ ---—•- — HT-aGHT (Ft) : !2 D PMJDCl.'ION FR 14 WALL: ITjUMU ION: YF5 5�-) NO (appy; SLEEP-N-AIRE /;I[- _ "�'JA�ISE S Tae me:•N MATERIALS: ---- F.KISI'ITiG SIGNS: NO AL)MINIsTRATIVE ExErr ON: N/A ( ) APPROVED ( ) NOW MLK]I AREA ( ) HEIGHT ( ) OaMM g S• NEW DEVELOPMENT ALI, SIGNS WILL BE NEW. PfANNING DEPART]�NT JAll sign permits must be accrnpanied by a scale Permit Fee: _ drawirq and plot plan. If murk authorized under Reaei.At No• a sign permit has not been cxaapletud within ninety Approved Bye v✓ day.: after the issuanoe of the permit, the permit Date: l�l qy rhall become null and FT,FJCIRICAI, PMIRTc-� .THAT RF OOHED OWNER OF M E REQUIRED: YES (V) NO ( ) PPoDP KRIZED BY 711E OWNER. BUII JN3 PERMIT --- — RBQUIRFD: YES jNO ( ) scant-s Signature 4644 SE 17th. Portladn 97202 232-262 . CP/B1TiPE7d4T Address Telephone N:\4x)!ZD\CrM FV\ I fl, i I fij M, OM NIt IN V G AMF, HFAIll I\I0141HwF,!—J Mil (AM014,11, 0. OkA PHIL V IN )URPOSE. OF P"YMt-.'.'41 01401 IN I Pf I I D V-',l IRPOVA,1' 1 IV filyl(il.110 1-4-110 !iGN94 -0035 OL 7 NII ot�, -ILAN CHF,4j� �. CK FF tI1 l) OFN ()MoIINI PAID 67. 50 SIGN PERMIT PERMIT #: SGN94-0032 DATE ISSUED. . . . : 03/01 /94 EXPIRATION DATE: C�(,/bl /qq PARCEL 1S136DD-00 ZONE. . . . . . . . . . . . C-G BUSINESS NAME. . : SLEEP-N-AIRE SIGN LOCATION. . : 11595 SW PACIFIC HWY APPLICANT/AGENT: DAN OSTERMAN BUSINESS TAX NO: SIGN: PERMANEN"' (X) FREESTANDING ( ) FREEWAY ( ) TEMPORARY ( ) WALL (X) ELECTRONIC ( ) OTHER ( ) BILLBOARD ) BALLOON ( ) SIGN DIMENSIONS. . . . . . . 3"9" X 26 4" TO'T'AL SIGN AREA. . . . . . : 125 sq. ft. WALL AREA. . . . . . . . . . . . . 1488 sq. ft. WALL FACE (DIRECTION) : S SIGN HEIGHT. . . . . . . . . . : 16 ft. PROJECTION FROM WALL. : 14 in.. TriLUMINATION. . . . . . . . . : INT DESCRIPTION OF SIGN: PERMANENT WALL SIGN. Dimensions: 319" x 26' 4" = 125 square feet. MATERIALS. . . . . . . . . . . . : LEXAN/ALUM EXISTING SIGNS . . . . . . . ELECTRICAL PERMIT REQUIRED: YES BUILDING PERMIT REQUIRED. . : NO ADMINISTRATIVE EXCEPTIONS. : N/A PEPMIT FEE: $ 35.00 APPROVED BY: DATE: 03/01/94 n!runt No. CITY OF TIGARD SIGN PUS Mrr APPLICATION 'Ihe applicant 1wxeby relies for a permit for t2ve. work indicated i c ated or as Jjown in the aoLxxq3anying plans ani specifications. SIGN ID=ON ADDRM;: 11595 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY ZONING: GC NAME OF BUSINESS: :,LEEP-N-AIRF APPLICANT/ : CAN OSTERMAN OWAt4y: Hr;AIIII SIGNS POKE: 232-2620 _ The City of t4-3r1 imposes an annual Business Tax whidl mist be kept current on all persons doing L=-inc-----s in Uv-- City. Do youpprresently have a current laasil� tax' YES (x NO ( ) U.L. Label AVAIffBLE UPON MFG./INSTALL 1:wPOSED SIGN: (Cheat as mny as apply) P AJI- Tr ( � Fpj=r INDING ( ) �Y ( ) TE POPARY ( ) WALE, (✓ ) ELocr SONIC ( ) cmff R ( ) B1I1LOARD ( ) BAL[DON t ) SIGN DIMENSIONS: Ile _ �'II2ATION DATE: Toni, SIGN AREA (Sq. Ft.) • TeUdL AREA. (Sq. Ft.) : WALL FACT',; Gx1C /1 fiELGNT (Ft) PROJ>~X".ION FIJI 49LI L: - IIIDW1=ON: YES ( NO ( ) TYPE: 1 N`r r_Iti/eC ply, SLEEP-N-AIRE — MATFRZALS: J _ -- L-a,3 UNG SIGNS: NO _ ADMINISTRATIVE EXC EFTION: N/A ( ) APPROVED ( ) HOW Qom{ _ AREA ( ) 1 iEICa[r ( ) 0114EgM: NEW DEVELOPMENT ALL SIGNS WILL, BE NEW. _ PLANNING Dg?ARRVg All sign permits mist be aac�nied by a scale Permit Fee: drawing and plot plan. If work autlx-i zed under Receipt No a sign permit has not been cal leted within ninety A�ed_�B _ W O, days after the issuance of Ux-- per=Lt, the permit Date: 3- -qt{ shall. beoume null and ELMRICALPE33Irr TL T QED GleMM OF '11-IF RBQU=: Y ( NO ( ) PROP ' K)RIZM BY 'LITE C04M. BUILDING PE[NIT RE7)U R1T,: YFS ( ) NO (� .cant's Signature _4644 SE 17th, Portladn 97202 732-2620 cp/BKMPERMr Address Telephone N:\WORD\CDMDfV\ if I Y lyl I 1\11 RIA I I I I r4l rl 1, 6 V., 0 0 IMI)IN 1 11.1. OLA hjj 14 1 J)vi 24 'qjRpjj� 111 Pf I t U f)l- PWWNT 0 ilTON PF-KMj I' I N 9 IA 00 1 HIA Pt.1411 IMA 0 t 00. 1/111) SIGN PERMIT PERMIT #: SGN94-0033 DATE ISSUED. . . . : 03/01/94 EXPIRATION DATE: PARCEL. . . . . . . . . : 1S136DB-00 ZONE. . . . . . . . . . . . C-G BUSINESS NAME. . : SLEEP-N-AIRE SIGN LOCATION. . : 11595 SW PACIFIC HWY APPLICANT/AGENT: DAN OSTERMAN BUSINESS TAX NO: SIGN: PERMANENT (X) FREESTANDING ( ) FREEWAY ( ) TEMPORARY ( ) WALL (X) ELECTRONIC ( ) OTHER ( ) BILLBOARD ( ) BALLOON ( ) SIGN DIMENSIONS. . . . . . : 3 ' X 23110" TOTAL SIGN AREA. . . . . . : 72 sq. ft. WALL AREA. . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000 sq. ft. WALL, FACE (DIRECTION) : E SIGN HEIGHT. . . . . . . . . . : 16 ft. PROJECTION FROM WALL. : 14 in. ILLUMINA'T'.TON. . . . . . . . . : INT DESCRIPTIOi OF SIGN: PERMANENT A'ALL SIGN. Dimensions: 3' x 23' 10" - 72 square feet.. MATERIALS. . . . . . . . . . . . . LEXAN/ALUM EXISTING SIGNS. . . . . . . : ELECTRICAL PERMIT REQCIRED: YES BUILDING PERMIT REQUIRED. . : NO ADMINISTRATIVE EXCEPTIONS. : N/A PERMIT FEE: $ 25.00 APPROVED BY: DATE: 03/01/94 Permit No. S��r�'- --� CTI'Y OF `I`IGA1W SIGN PEt;iQT APPLICNI'ION licant hereby aPP�ei for a permit for the work ir.3icate�d or as shown in the The ' i.f icati(N as „�l'lI r]arm arra 5 SIW IDCMTION ALIMSS= _11595 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY ?�av�rrjc: Gc NAME OF I3ZI;IIZLSS. _SLEEP-N-AIRF______ 23) 2620 _ DAN OS_TERMAN _ CCMPANY:_ III-ATH SIGNS APPIICANI/A=M: g E= —`------- rent on all ,d i� aananrn�al Busin�� Tax which mist t� keptcur�� have a Currmt sobusis�qlie ADa �I ABLE Uures�ltlPON MFG./INSTALL,per — - YF5 (x ) NO Ti.L. Label I SIGN: (CZ ck as miny as apply) *'ED FRy ( ) rERQNENT (✓) 2ARY ( ) WALL BILuT_ �m BALL” ( ) 01HER ( ) ( ) �NEXPIRATION DATE: SIGN DSIONS: --- 3 '?C2-SL-)(2 -- --------- -_ - t(_ _ I TarAL SIGN ARM (Sq- Ft-) : WALL AREA ( Ft.) : VALL FACE: _0 ILEjC;jir (Ft) PRWF7CTICt1 FRI- 4 WAIJ�,cc -- 11 :12 •�E-LTf 1T_ VMna ION= YES X) NO ( ) TYPE: - CTJPY: SLEEP-N-A I R E - ------- --- MATERIALS; - .... _- — EKLSrING SIGNS: _NO ------- - .�.-----------" APPf�7VF1� AEMINMIZATIVE EXC!E TION: NAREA ( ) I1aga NEW DEVELOPMENT ALL SIGNS WILL BE NEW .- mv� be aeoo�lc�d by a scale pLATnder NING --------- �wng �d�plot plan. If work aL.ttxori7ed 'Li permit Fee: a sign permit has not been oc:n�let c�dt/within peteritY pit ReoPi t No: clays after the issuarx>= of the p�n'►1 ATS ved W stall tx� nu?.l arra Date' - k- 'I E {2FJODf21)FD OWNFSi OF TE{E . 711AT �CIVICAL P�1 NO ( ) PROPI• R iORI2F7�BY 'IZ{E (74dN:7? RBID ^_- gUIID,NG pEm4i r ( ) 1cant's SigrLature R.FX"OFI: YES ( ) Portladn 97202 232-26�— 4644�, l.7th Telephone �� ) Address cp/l p)KM N: jNSPECTION NOTICE City of Tigard Building Department 13125 SM Ball Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Inspection Line (Rec-0-Phone)s 639-4175 Business Phone: 639-4171 Inspection:. Footing Plbg. Underelab /Flee;:. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk Found. Pl.bg. Top Out lGrs Line FINAL: Post/Beam Struct. San. Sewei Framing -Bldg. Post/Beam Mech. Rain Drain Insulation -Plumb. Plbg. Underfloor Mates CLine ['�/ Gyp. Bd. -Hoch. Date Requested: C/ ----------- & it 1 �, / Q�� Time- AM PN Address:1 ! �/ u 1" L Permit ` a Builder: c-Z3—� TBE FOLLOWING OORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: of Inspector:__ ZZX Dates APPROVED DISAPPROVED T.PPROVED SUR-TFr'T TO AnOVE CalI For Rel nap. TMSPECTION NOTICE City of Tigard Building DePartaent 13125 SW Bali Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Inspection Line (Rec-4*-hone): 639-4175 Business Phone: 634-417 Inspection:—_--— -------- — -- Footing Plbg. Underslab Mech. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk Found. Plbg. Top Out Gas Line FINAL: Post/Beam Struct. San. Sewer Framing --Bldg. Post/Beam Mech. Rain Drain Insulation -Plumb. Plbg. Underfloor Water Line / Gyp. Gd.) -Meth. Date Remie�tads l "r l ' �I _ Timet _AM cJPM Address: I \ `l� Permit Builder• THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: 4 Inspector• _ Date: 'Z'��/ /— APPROVED DISAPPROVEDy 'APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOVE Call For Reinsp. INSPECTION NOTICE City of Tigard Building Departsiant 13125 Bt Ba . Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Inspection Line (Rec-O-Phons)= 639-4175 Business Phone= 639-4171 Inspections_ _ Footing Plbg. Underslab Mach, Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk Found. Plbg. Top Out Gas Line FINAL= Post/Beam Struct. San. SewerFramin; > -Bldg. Pest/Beam Hoch. Rain Drain Insulation -Plumb. Plbg. Underfloor Nater Line Gyp. Bd. -Hoch. Data Requested:_ __ Time= AH PH Addreas: Permit i= Builder= Permit THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARF REQUIRED: Inspector:___-- ,/ � �'�`�{_ Date: __APPROVED DISAPPROVED APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOHM —_ Ca1l For Rel.nsp. INSPECTION NOTICE '\ City of Tigard Willding DwpaLtaent 4�/71 13125 811 Ball Blvd. Tigard. Oregon 97223 Inspection Line (Rec-O-Phone): 639-4175 Business Phon Inspection:_ Footing Plbg. Underslab Hoch. Rough-in tprdr/Sdwlk Found. Plbg. Top Out Gas Line FINAL: Post/Beam Struct. Ban. Sower Framing -Bldg. Post/Beam Mach. Rain Drain Insulation -Plumb. Plbg. Underfloor Nater Line Gyp. Bd. -Mach. Date Requested: �J �n �C I Time: AM PN Address: {v L.�:`�� ((_��/ ..— Permit #s Builder: THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: -77 Inspector: Y_A Date: L � i AFPROVED _ DtgAPPROVED APPROVED SODJRCT rO ABOVE Call For Reinnp. 1qSPECTI0t7 NOTICE City of Tigard Building Departresnt 13125 Bw Ball Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Inspection Line (Rec-O-Phone)t 639-4175 Business Phone: 639-4171 Inspections Footing Plbg. Underelab Mach. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk round. Plbg. Top Outaa-L_�BJ r IINALs Post/Beam Struct. San. Sewer Framing -Bldg. Post/Beare Mech. Rain Drain Insulation -Plumb. Plbg. Un rfloor Nrter Lineq Gyp. Rd. -Meeh. Data Requested: �ll �- ( Tielat �1M PM Addresse -I� �/ �C-�t� �. Permit CSI LI- 1�7 Builder: TBE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: Inspectors vbt Date: L- �__APPR0VV) DISAPPROVED APPROVEn SUBJECT TO ABOVr ►/i `-_ f� Call For Reinep. INSPRCTION NOTICE City of Tigard Building Department 13128 OW Ball Blvd. Tigard• Oregon 97223 Inspection Lina (Rec-o-Phone): 639--4175 Business Phones 639--4171 Inspection:_ FontinS _kg. Undorelab M . Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk Found. Plbg. Top Out Gas Line FINAL: Poet/Beam etruct. San. Sewer Framing -Bldg. Post/Beam Hoch. Rain Drain Insulatior -Plumb. Plbg. Underfloor Nater Line Gyp. Rd. -Hoch. Date 14:questod:,� Timet AN PH Addrasi::// S/99.S- Permit f c THE F01AA KING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: Inspector: M Data:_2 ✓ y APPROVED DISAPPROVED APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABO6'E --Call For Reinep. INSPECTION NOTICE city or Tigard Building Departesent 13125 M Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Inspection Line (Rec--o-Phones 639-4175 Business Ph'inez 639-4171 Inspections Footing Plbg. Underelab Mech. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk round. Plbg. Top Out Cas Line FINAL: Post/Beam Struct. San. Sewer �11mLng -Bldg. Poet/Bear Meci.. Rain Drain Insulation -Plumb. Plbg. tnderfloor W or Line 7 C� O p. Sd. -Hoch. Date Reguestede G ^ -�1 / Times AMpM (I 1 Addressz�� `^IS /�CJL�I� IJw40 Perm!t IsFv/7 3 -L,)2-9 � Builder: � THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: Iaspector: Dates _ _APPROVED DT.SSAAP'PRROVED AIPROVRD SUBJECT TO ABOVE Call ?or Reinep. INSPECTION NOTICE City of Tigard Building Department 13125 SR Hall Blvd. -19ard, Aragon 97223 Inspection Line (Roe-0-Phone)s 639-4175 Business Phone: 539-4171 Inspection: Footing Plbg. Underslab Hach. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk Found.. Plbg. Top Out Gas Line FINAL: Post/Beam Struct. San. Sewer Framing -Bldg. Post/Beam Hoch. Rain Drain Insulation -Plumb. Plbg. Underfloor Nater Line Gyp. Rd. -Mach. L Date Requested:_ ' 2 I' Times 2 p AM PM Address: - �t�t�� ci��/ Perm/it tsiJ1�1 /13 Cis 1 D Builder: TRE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: Inapectoc: Date: 2 L, APPROVED DISAPPROVED _ APPROVRD SUBJRCT TO ABOVR _,Call For Reinsp. INSPECTION NOTICP City of Tigard Building Department 13125 8R Brll Blvd. S'igard, Oregon 97223 Inspection Line (ROC-O-Phone): 639-4175 Business Phone: 6.39-4171 { Inspections 1\e (_I I ki -- Footing Plbg. Underslab Hach. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk Found. Plbg. Top Out Gas L1,•7 FINAL: Post/Beam Struct. San. Sewer Framing -Bldg. Post/Beam Hoch. Rain Drain Insulation -Plumb. Plhg. Underfloor Mater Line Gyp. Bd. -Hoch. L/ Date Requeetedf lD -I I _ Time: i!1! _PM c� Address: l � � ��d_��<< �� I� 1�� If Permit #160M-62-1% Builder: THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: _ y,tLT"fdrl�s ,v e-�,•�v (- Inspector: Date:__1 _____APPROVED DISAPPROVED APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOVE Call For Reinsp. INSPECTION NOTICE City of Tigard Building Department 13125 8N Ball Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Inspection Line (Roc-O-Phone)t E39-4175 Businean Phone: 639-4171 Inspection:__ Footing P)bg. Underslab Mech. Rough-in Alpr/Sdwlk Found. 1!lbg. Top Out Gas Line FIN) "I Post/Beam Struct. San. Sewer Framing -Bldg. Post/Deem Mach. Rain Drain Insulation -Plumb. Plbg. Underfloor Water Line Gyp. Bd. -Meeh. Dots R�aquosted:_Lc _ '_ _Time: —AM `- PM Address: / Builder: T= FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE R3QUIRED: Inspector: - �— Dates,_/ _APPROVED ^*PPROVED 4PPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOVE Call For Reinsp. INSPECTION MPTICE City of Tigard Building Department 13125 811 Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Inspection Line (Rec-O-Phone): 639-4175 Business Phone: 639-4111 Inspection: _ .jc-i ( I� �' (-� Forting Plbg. Underelab Mech. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk Found. Plbg. Top Out Gas Line FINAL: Post/Beam Struct. San. Sewer Framiny -Bldg. Post/Beam Mech. Rain Drain Insulation -Plu:ub. Plbg. Underfloor Nater Linel��/! Gyp. Bd. -Hech. Date Requested: '- � /l/ __Time: p�AN 'p7x Adirwesz trlilGl�(� fju�U Permit 1 ��1�`73 6"q Builder: c1rJC�� t�� e1 /0 J THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: In. i' �� J _APPROVED DISAPPROVED APPROVED SUB.7ECT TO ABOVE _ Call. ^nr Reinsp. CI1Y OF T I GAR® MECHANPE RICAL M IT' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 0"IRT PERMIT #. . . . . . . : MEC94-1 - , T 0 13126 SW Hall Blvd.Tigard,Oregon 97223,1 V71 DATE ISSUED: 1/13/94- PARCEL: 1S.136DB--00200 115 5 sw U I C HWY ZONING: C-6 BLOCK. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CLASS OF WORK. . :NEW FLOOR FuRN. . . . EVAP COOLERS: 'TYPE OF' USE. . . . :COM UNIT HEATERS. . : VENT FANS. . . : 1 OCCUPANCY GRP. . :B2 VENTS WIO APPL: VENT SYSTEMS: STORIES. . . . . . . . : 1 ','ILERS/COMPRESSOR5 HOODS. . . . . . . : FUEL TYPES------- - - 0--3 HP. . . . : DOMES. INCIN: : /GAS/ 3-15 HTI. . . . : 1 COMML. INCIN: MAX INPUT: 15-30 HP. . . . - REPAIR UNITS: .1. FIRL D(4MPERS7. . : 30-50 HP. . . . : WOODSTOVES. . : GAS PRESSURE. . . : 50+ HP. . . . : CLO DRYERS. . : NO. OF AIR HANDLING UNITS OTHER UNITS. : FURN < 100K BTU: <= 10000 cfm : GAS OUTLETS. : 1 TURN > =100K BTU: > 10000 cfm : Pemarks : Francescl-ii. Property new retail sales bl.ti ] ding (fl-irniti-ire) . Only part o f east wall is 1—hr fire—rated. Storm drain credits applied from demo permit Owner: FEES FWINCESCHI PROPERTIES type amount by date recpt GOO THIRD STREET PRM_T $ 32. 00 JH 01/13/94 — PLCK $ 8. 00 JH 01 /13/94 — SAN FRANCISCO CA 94107 5PCT $ 1. 60 JH 01/113/94 -•- Phone Phone #- Contract or: AMERICAN HEATING, INC. 1339 BE GIDEON PORTLAND CIR 9720c'-_' Phone #: 239-460171 f 41. 60 TOTAL Reg #. . : 33135 REQUIRED INSF ECT IONS This permit is issued subject to the regulations contained in the Gas Line Insij Tigard Municipal Code, State of Ore. Specialty Codes and all other Heating Unt Insp applicable laws. All work will be done in accordance with DUCt Inspection approved plans. This permit will ?xpire if work is not started Misc. Inspection ............. within 180 days of issuance, or if work is suspended for more Final Inspection than 180 days. 1 -termittee Signati.tre, ..lied Py : Call for inspection 639--4175 City of Tigard MECHANICAL_ PERMIT Planck/Rec. # 1:3125 sw Hall Blvd. APPLICATION ' Permit # e(. PO Box 23397Q Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 _ �.�•• .ra.n«wDescription t > a ,�/fit' Table 3A Mechanical Code 01 Y PRICE AMT Job l�M S 570 GG�s v' 1) Permit Fec. -0- -0- 10.00 Address •, ((1 2) Supplemental Permit 3.00 .m.ice •• Furnace to 100,000 1) incl. ducts 8 vents 6.00 ��ro��•• ^ Furnace 100,000 BTU + Owner 2) incl, ducts 8 vents 7.50 .r.u. Floor Furnance 3) incl. vent 6.00 .» « ..•».t Suspended heater,wall heater 4) or floor mounted heater 6.00 ".p w ^°^• ent not Inc.in Occupant 5) appliance permit 3.00 c ysd. Repair of heating,ref ig. 6) cooling,absorption unit r 6.00 air / Boiler or comp, eat pump,aco j,te 1 ,tom j��l(1 7) to 3 HP absorp unit to 100K BTLI 6.00 J M�•v « / Boiler or comp,fleat pump,air cond. 8) 3-15 HP absorp unit to 500K BTU 11.00 ly�lTldCfor Boiler or comp, iea—F t pump,—a—if co 7P?O.3-- 9) 15.30 HP absorp unit.5-1 mi BTU 15.00 01• ..— VAYL— Boiler or comp,heat pump,au co O-7-) 10) 30-EO HP absorp unit 1-1.75 mil BTU 22.50 I ere y acknowledge at I have read is application.that trio Boiler or comp,heat pump,ar cond. information given is correct, that I am the owner or authorized agent 11) >50 HP absorp Unit 1.75 mil BTU 31.50 of the owner,that plans submitted are in compliance with State Air handling unit to laws,that I am registered with the Construction Contractors Board, 12) 10,000 CFM 4.50 that the number given is correct. (If exempt from State registration, Air handling unit please give reason below.) 13) 10,000 CT M+ 7.50 Non portable 14) evaporate cooler 4.50 ent fan connected 15) to a single duct 3.00 Ventilation system not 16) included in appliance permit 4.50 Hood served y 17) mechanical exhaust 4.50 Descnbe work new QQaddition a terati n repairz Commercial or industrial to be done residents 1 Q non-residential 18) type incinerator 30.00 Existing use of Other i e.,woodstove,water building or property_ 19) healer, solar,clothes dryers,etc. 4.50 Proposed use of i 20) Gas piping one to four outlets 2.00 0C, building or property 21) More than 4-per outlet Type of fuel-oil Q natural gas&Ii LPG O efectric Q OTIC�. =tAn,-.. ee$25.00 SUBTOTAL PERMITS BECOME VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS,OR 5%SURCHARGE IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIMrL PLAN REVIEW 25%OF SUBTOTAL S nc AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. TOTAL Special Conditions Date issued _ by A•vECNONT .aeco�ww 4 CHLoIN 14mtjl,JN 1, 41. 60 AME-Alt"AN HVP'l I.N(-'' (3,141.7311 silyfOUNF tA. 00 PAYMLNI DA-TF 0:1 1..:3/414 OF* PAYMP-Nf AlACRINI PAID PAYMVNI flMOIANT PO(U IJIAN ICAL. PF 3� . 00 P1.4-1N ("fir-.CK PE 8. ofil IJAII D PI-R 60 RF-AAIL ��W PACIFIC HWY irIFII (.1m(PINI P(-Ilo INSPBCrION NOTICB_, City of Tigard Building Department 13125 SR Ball Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Inspection Line (Roc-O-Phone)s 639-4175 Business Phones 639-4171 Inspections_ Footing Plbg. Underelab Mach. Rough-.in Appr/Sdwlk Found. Plbg. Top Out Gas Line FINALS Post/Beam Struct. San. Sewer Framing -Bldg. Post/Beam Hoch. Rain Drain Insr:lation -Plumb. Plbg. Underfloor Nater Line Gyp. Bd. -Hoch. y� Date Requested: _Timer _ AH PH , 0Z7 aAddress:_// Builder: TAE FOLLOWING 'ORRSCTIONS ARE REQUIRRD: - .t!Z .� . IneQector�sj -- — —_ Date: v APPROVED DISAPPROVED APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOVE --Call For Reinep. INSPECTION NOTICE City of Tigard Building Department 3L8125 811 9a1.1 Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Inspection Line (Rec-O-Phone)t 639-4175 Pusineas Phone: 639-4171 Inspections _ v (.Y-ty Footing Plbg. Underelab Hoch. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk Found. Plbg. Top Out Gas Line FINAL.: Poet/Beam Struct. San. Sewer Framing -Bldg. Post/Beam Hach. Rain Drain Insulation -Pltuab. Plbg. Underfloor Nater Line Gyp. Bd. -Hoch. Data Data Requestedt / TLMOO ( _AM PN Address:_ i r "ri (^l-}\( #tL► I . _ Permit I 6('q U' L Builder t 1-�VL�L1`� �.�� ( /L� THE FOLLOWINr CORRECTIONS ARS REQUIRED: Inspectort__ — -- Date:�,� — _—APPROVED - DISAPPROVED APPROVED SURJECT TO AROVP, —Call For Reinap. INSPECTION NOTICE r_ City of Tigard Building Department 13125 SSI Ball Blvd. Tigard, O-agoo 97223 Inspection Lisle (Rec-O-Phone)s 639-4175 Business Phone: 639-4171 Inepectioni_ -- looting Plbg. Underalab '!ech. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk round. Plbq To Out Gas Line FINAL: Post/Beam Struct. ( Framing -Bldg. Post/Beam Mach. Rain Drain Insulation -Plumb. Plbg. Underflooa Nater Line Gyp. Bd. -Hoch. 'bu" Data Requested: / y TimesTy- Address: 3 7 / . Builder: C THE FOLLONX CORRZCTICNB ARE REQUIRED= Inspectors _ Datas APPROVED -__i DISAPPROVED APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOVE Call For Reiner+. INSPECTjON NOTICE city of Tigard Building Departsient 13125 BW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Inspertion Line (Rec-O-Phone): 639-4175 Business Phone: 639-41.71 Inspection:_ ,� %Lcz:�-Cc1•-C�-' •� -- ---- looting Plbg. Underslab Mach. Rough-]r Appr/Sdwlk Found. Plbg. Top Out Gas Line FINAL: Post/Beam Struct. San. Sewer Framing -Bldg. Post/Beam Mach. Rain Drain Insulation -Plumb. V�ndez[loor Nater Line Gyp. Bd. -Mach. Date Requested:—, (, _ Time: 1 G—AM —PH Address s Builder: 1 c Gl.�-2J THE MLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQOIRED: Olt 4 on Inspector: —. _ Datel !— `APPROVED _! DISAPPROVRD APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOVE Call For Reinsp. INSPECTION NOTICE Cita or Tigard Building Departaent 13126 Nm Ball Blvd- Tigard, Oregon 97223 Inspection 1,0.ne (Rae.--O-Phone)s 639-4175 Business Phone: 639-4171 Inspection: Footing Plbg. Underelab Mech. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk Found. Plbq. Top Out Gas Line FINAL: Post/Ream Struct. San. Sewer Framing -Bldg. Post/Beam Mech. Rain Drain Insulation -Plumb. Plbg. Underrloor Nater Line Gyp. Bd. �(-Mach. Date Requesteds z _Times AM PM Address: J P Builder: �zz C TRE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: i Tnepecto?.: APPROVRU DISAPPROVED �' APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOVE --call. For Reinep. CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLUMBING PERMIT 13125 SW Hall Blvd.Tigard,Oregon 972.3*8199 (503)$39-4171 PERMIT #. .. . . . . . . . : PLM93...02 39 631)-4171 DATE ISSUED: 01/03/94 PARCEL: IS136DB—OVILOO BITE ADDRESS. . . 11595 3W PACIFIC HWY SUBDIVISION. . . . ZONING: C----G [)LOCK. . . . . . . . . . . LOT. . . . . . . . . . . . . GLOSS OF WORK. . :NEW GARBAGE DI5POSALS. MOBILE HOME SPACES. .CvPE OF USE. . . . :COM WASHING MACH. . . . . . . : BACKFLOW PREVNTRS. . : OCLIJPANCY GRP. . B2 FLOOR DRAINS. . . . . . . : 'TRAPS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . : STURIES. . . . . . . . : 1 WATER HEATERS. . . . . . : CATCH BASINS. . . . . . . : 1 LAUNDRY TRAYS. . . . . . : SF RAIN DRAIN:,. . . . . . SINKS. . . . . . . . . . . URINALS. . . . . . . . . . . . . GREASE TRAPS. . . . . . . . LAVATORIES. . . . . :2 OTHER FIXTURES. . . . . :5 TUB/SHOWERS. . . . : SEWER LINE (ft ) . . . . :200 WATER CLOSETS. . '. WATER LINL ( ft ) . . . . : 100 DISHWAS14ERS. . . . : RAIN DRAIN (ft ) . . . . :200 Remarks : Ft-an(::es(:-,hi Pt-cper-ty new retail sales bt.tilding (fi.ir-niti-tr-e) Cin.[y part of-- east wall is 1—hr- fire--rafted. ZONE: C—G (General Commer,cial ) . WCTlyl 1S1 36DB, tax lot .,-,.Olzl. Uwner: FEES FRANCESCHI PROPERTIES type Anicil-int by date V-ecpt 600 THIRD STREET PRMT $ 170. 00 JF 01/03/94 PLCK $ 42. 50 JF 01/03/94 13AN FRANCISCO CA 94107 5PCT $ 8. 50 JF 01/'Z13/94 Phone #: Cuntt-actor-: PAC: WEST PLUMBING 2110 NE CORNELL RD HILLSBORO OR 97124 1-71h(ine #: 6/-'.'J--b4-41 $ 221. 00 TOTAL Req #. . . 81902 REQUIRED TNSPECTIONS This permit is issued subject to the regulations contained in the Sewer- Inspection Tigard Municipal Code, State of Ore. Specialty Codes and all other Water Line Insp applicable laws. All work will be done in accordance with Rol-tqh—in Insp approved plans. This permit will expire if work is not sta.,ted Top—ok_lt Insp within 180 days of issuance, or if work is suspended for more Stcir-m Drain Insp th4n 188 days. Rain Lr-ain Insp Misc. Inspection iFinal Inspectionn ' mttep Signatut-e: It,`_L' k Call for, inspection 639-4175 City of Tigard PLUMBING PERMIT Planck/Rec. # 13125 sw Hail Blvd. APPLICATION Permit # f'O Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 )escnph«, ORS 814 21-6 10 QTY PRICE AMT Job qT / S '> `�,/ A21-IfL`/ W FIXTURES so Address � n — — Lavatory 7.50 -- « r„r ----- Tub or TublShower om . Shower Only 7.50 _ r ylater Closet 7.50 r SJ Ishwasher 7.50 Owner Ccs W ZIP .ar ye laposa r�/ c Washing Machine 7.50 ,3)r' �iGr.C%Sr•f' J -- 7.50 - 100r )fain 1,11vp /�- Water eater „o Laundry Room ray Occupant /- StN QY r�, Urinal 150 50 Other Fixtures(Specify) _ Y,. 7.50 ,5- 22 1 .i I c MISCELtiA,'!FOUS Contractor ��,„. P Sewer 1st 1-0-0 30., •c rw rruai Ne. :feWwer e3.A di t. 10 115.00) aterervice 1 st 100'— E S 70. ` hereby ac ow ge at ve'rea this application, a that ho Wa(er Service ea. Addit.200' 15.00 information given is correct,that I am the owner or audiorized agent of Sturm Rain Drain 1st 100' 30.00 the owner,that plans submitted are in compliance with State laws,that 1 l d am registered with the Constriction Contractor's Board,that the number Storm 6 Rain Drain Add t. too' 15.00 given is correct (If exempt from State registration,please give reason -� Moble Home Spac, 25.00 below.)----, Back FIow Preventici Device or Anti-Pollution Devito 7.00 „« yrap oraw ste Aul Connected to a Fixture _ 7.50 Describe w new 0 a It(orl 0 alteration() repair Catch Basin --Ts—o S O to be done resldenlal Q non-residential IS 40.00 Insp.of Exist.Plumbing _ per hr 40.00 Specialty Requested Inspections per hr Existing use of Rain Drain,single rami building or property r— dwelling _ 15.00 Residential backflow prevention devices 15.00 Proposed use of Q ) building or property - -'—I residential ec low-- — prevention devices) NOTICE 'Minimum Fee$25.00 SUBTOTAL PERMITS BECOME VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION 5%SURCHARGE AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS,OR IF COIJSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED PLAN REVIEW 25%OF SUBTOTAL FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. TOTAL Special Conditions Date issue by ►.rcclwu+at C I'TY OF' T I GARD RECE.1 PI OF PAYM!:M IV 1, N1.1. 194 *47196 C,'HECIX AMOUNT a 221. 00 IAME i PAC, WEST PIA)MIAINC4 C'U41.4 MOUNT s FA. 00 -IDDRESt-) s P.110 NE C,(:)RNFLl.- RD V-1AYMEN1 DATE. s 01/03/94 HILLSBORD, OR SUBD I V I S I ON "UNPOISL Of" t-1(4YMVNT AMOUNI PAID ( it POYMINI 01,11111NI PAID ,LUMBING 110. 00 T. 1�1 I I 1 1) t-4.P l....AN CHECK FE 5171 1595 c3W PA(]IFIt' HWY RAWESCHT PROPF.RTIF'c; CYTAL AMOUNT PAID 00 12/10/93 12:42 $1 503 620 5940 GLO ENGINEERS CITY OF TIGARD (a 002 _ GeolqpEnCT--- s MEMORANDUM Portland TO: David Scott - City of Tigard FROM: Don Rondema - GeoEngineers DATE: December 30, 1993 FILE: 3040-003 SUBJF-C T: Fsanc"Chi Site next to Fred Meyer on Hwy 99 This memo is in explanation of our recommendations for foo.ing subgrade preparation at the subject site, as it varves from that specified and that stated in the bui ding code. Our original geotechnical report dated April 30, 1993 recommended 95% compaction Plative ASTM D-1557 for granular structural fill, and Chapter 70 of the building code requires 9)%. It is our opinion that compaction to originally specified relative dry densities would increase the 1 otential for differential settlement of the footings. Tt►is is of particular concern where continuous foot ing are to overlie abrupt transitions between silt ani deep crushed rock fill. We have observed 0 a overexcavation of soft/loose soil from areas of footing subgrade at the site, as well as observed rept mentative portions of granular backfill and compaction up to footing subgrade elevations. Although we did not perform nuclear density testing on the granular fill in foundation areas, based on our i ibservations it is our opinion that the granular fill placed under footing areas is suitable for foundat on support. PRpF�t,� �GNt� +E n7 9 ' Don Rondema, P E. 01t8 0 t�! POO 1201/c)q j1 SPECTyi041_NOTICE City of Tigard Building Departmant 13125 BW Ball Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Inspection Line (Roc-O-Phones 639-4175 Business Phone: 639-4171 inepaations _ -- ---- ,;q Plbg. Underelab Hach. Rough-in Appr/Sdwlk round. Plbg. Top Out Gas Line FINALS Post/Beam Struct. San. flower Framing -Bldg. Post/Beam Hoch. Rain Drain Insulation -Plumb. Plbg. Underfloor Nater Line Gyp. Rd. -Hach. Date Requesteds 12 _ 72Tom: Address: 1a_��iC 11�� , Permit Builders V\,1/�l`� j�q THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED: 11 Inspector: Data: L ✓ C,_ V APPROVED DISAPPROVED APPROVED SUBJECT TO ABOVE Fall For RAinsp. 121,291,93 14:47 '$1 503 620 5940 GEO ENGINEERS 444 CITY OF TIGARD [a 001 dft Ile�tS 7504 SW Bridgeport Road GeoiMpEn Portland, Oregon 97224 one: (503) 624-91274 FAX TRANSMITTAL Fax (503) 620-5940 To: City of Tigard Date: December 29, 1993 File: 3040-003 Fax Number: 684-7297 Attention: George Steele Regarding: Franceschi property next to Fred Mea er - Hwy 99 Pages Date Description t 12/29, 93 Fax Transmittal 6 12/29/93 geotechnical field report: to date Total Pages: 7 Comments: George, here are the geotechnical f. eld reports to date on the subject project. I have observed o-erexcavation and backfill/compaction of foundation ai,d slab subgrade at this project and find the subgrade now suitable :'or foundation and slab support. ODEQ has tank decommissioning recor4Ls and closure on file, and could provide you with a copy. We have coinducted an environmental evaluation of the property in conjuiiction with our geotechnical report. Should you like F copy of ur environmental report please give me a call. I will be copying you on all. field reports, a, ' will he issuing a tsore formal geotechnical letter of .omplianee upon completion of geotechnical portions of this proje,.t. Signe i ,- Don Rondema, P.E. FIELD 1 MPORT File Num3c�0003 Geo= Engineers Rolecr. — rMle: 7504 SW Bridgeport Road Franceschi Off .ce Building 12/20/93 Portland, Oregon 97224 Ownef: Report Number: (503) 624-Y274 Franceschf�Pro >erties 1 _ Reparad 8Y• �l tpuUnn•____ Arrival' Page: Don Rondema, P.E. Tigard off HWY 99W 1 of I purpnee of V%W - tNa,&mr• Depanurc: Permit Number: observe subgrade Cool and clear I arrived on-site to evaluate the soils it the area of the interior footing j.n order to recommend overexcavation and footing support options. The excavation revealed a depth of six feet to nat ve soils, with a concrete wall about 1.5 feet to the north cf the footing. I recommended that the excavation be cleaned out to a depth of six-feet with a three foot perimeter offset from the footing edge on all sides but the north where the wall was encountered. Backfill in this excavation shuuld consist of .lear., well. graded angular rock such as a 3/4"-0. The initial lift way be pla :ed and compacted in a three feet thick lift to prevent pumping the wet silt below, Subsequent lifts should be one foot thick and also compacted. I also dis,:ussed alternates to complete overexcavation in the slab subgrade and recommended a minimum overexc.-vati_on of one foot. I said I would return later in the lay to observe progress. Later in the day I arrived to observe profress. Slab subgrade had been reached in the eastern portion of the building and probes showed it to be firm and suitable for rock placement. I will return tomorrow midday to observe rogress. T1.,,r+port preserrte npinlnns lormcd or,a regio nt nir nb rrr-mion.el er mtles relating to gee cchnicel engir,eering. We rely nn the rrntreetor In Comply with the plane end necificatlnns throughout the dwatlnn of the projcn Irrespective rn the presence of our reprr aentative. our work dors not Include euperoston nr dlrrctlon of the aC'ual work of the contractor.Ne employees or agents. our firm well not be rasnunsible for job or site eefety on this protect. 1 /� 12.291'93 14:48 $1 503 ego 5940 GEO ENGINEERS 444 CITY OF TIGARD 2002 RO Number:' '7140 (� ppm FIELD :,ZEPORT 3 -003 Geo Enginem Rejert: - Date: 7504 SW Bridgeport Road Franceschi Off ice Building 12/21/93 Portland, Oregon 97W def= Fleport Numbtf- (503) 6213-97.74 Franceschi Pro ?arties 2 Repand BY: lneatlon: Arrival: Page' Don Rondema, P.E. Tigard off HWY 99W 1 of 1 °urpose of 4161G VVea�� Oepanurc; Pernik Number; observe excavation of concrete s0=1f-tattid clear I arrived on-site to observe the concrete structure encountered in the building area. It appeared to be an old concri:te oil.-water separator approximately 3x8 ft. in dimesnion and 3ft, de,.p. I observed no evidence of contaminated soil around the separator when it was removed. The interior of the separator was filled with oh;.t appeared to be wean soil. Some petezoleum staining was observed on the interior concrete surface of the separator , along with a petroleum odor. The oil water separato : was excavated and removed. I recommended the excavation be backfilled with :lean crushed rock compacted in one foot thick lifts. I noted that the interior footing excavation had been backfilled to finished footing subgrade elevation and compacted with a wacker/dumping jack type compactor. Skip Gregory of Gregory Pacif _c stated that the excavation had beer. Cleaned of sloughed material, and that ha been compacted according to our recommendations. I probed more of the slab sutgrade and noted that the south central portion was very soft. Skip said this area was to be lowered further_ I will -eevaluate when it is at proposed grade. Dennis with Yorke 6 Curtis will call me tommor-ow to schedule a visit to observed footing excavations. TTIs report prcarm:opininns tormeet as a reault of our ohservetlons of activltle*relating,n gee echnlud engineering. We rely on the corrtrador t.,comply vMh the plans and eperA catlons throughout the dutntlon of the protect Irrespective of the presence�t our.eprn 9rmative- our work dnas not Includ-superosion or dlrectlon of the actual wnrk of the Contractor.his employee,or agents. Our ihm-All not be responstble fr.r Job or-Jte safety on this prajcd. / Attachments' Ken Franceschi- Franceschi Properties Signe -, 2.29.93 14: 18 0&1 503 620 5940 GEO ENGINEERS CITY OF riGARD Z003 File Numb FIELD 'aEPORT -003 Geo $Engineers ProkA Date_ -- 7504 SW Bridgeport Road Franceschi Uff ice Building 12/22/93 Portland, Oregon 97224 Ov"r' Report Nlumeer. (50) 624,9274 Franceschi Pro 3erties 3 P►epared BY I.0cadon: Arr'val: Page: Don Rondema, P.E. Tigard off HWY 99W 1 of 1 Ag;;se o-Walt weaAxr: -! Departure: Perrmt Numbei: observe slab subgrade Cool and clear I arrived on-site to observe the slab subgrade. The south central portion was observed to have very soft silt fill at th,t surface with probes extending 2 or more feet into it. I had Skip back a loaded truck into this area and observed deflections of around 6 inches. I do ineated the soft area and recommended that it be overexcavated another flot, that a 6 oz. non-woven filter fabric be placed, and that it be backfilled in one 2 foot thick lift with crushed reek or the submitted asphalt rock. I also observed that the excavation from the oil/water separator was filled to grade with crushed rock. I stated to Dennis that the south and west footing excavations were the most likely to need overexcavation, and that I tedrit.id to observe condition of all footing subgrade. Dennis stated footing excavarion will occur todorrow, and that he would call me to schedule a site visit. L This report presents opinlnnn lnrraert ae a rr..uh�f our ohserv(plonr,of activitles relating to ge,ter,hnlcal englnrering. we rely on the coutranter to comply w+th the pions and spechlcaltons throughout the duration of the pto)cct Irrespective of the presenee of Our veer,entative. our work doer not Include supervision or tllrer..ttnn of the actual work of 1he contractor,his employees or egemr. our firm will not be reaponslble for job o-sit gaiety on this prolcet Attachments: Ken Franceschi- Franceschi Propertif s Sign; pis i iQp Ar . VnrlrP F- hart-;'c 12.29-93 14:49 $1 503 620 5040 GEO ENGINEERS CITY OF TIGARD Z004 Re Number'�dto FIELD REPORT 2�44-003 GeoEngi.neers Ptt+lect — Date: 7504 SW Bridgeport Road Franceschi 0£f .ce Building 12/23/93 Portland, Oregon 972.24 oymer. Report Number. (503) 624-9V4 Franceschi Pro'>erties 4 Revved By: Lnratlon: Arrival: Page: Don Rondema, P.E. Tigard off HWY 99W 1 of 1 ptrp me cf Vtslt: Wmthar -- Departure: Parmh Number: observe footing subgrade Cool and fog I arrived on-site to obsorve the footing sabgrade. Probes with a 3/8" diameter steel rod showed the footing subgrade along the north and east sides to be firm and suitable as a footing bearing surf:.ce. The northern portion of the west wall footing also appeared firm and suital-le. Ths southern portion of the west wall footing subgrade and the southern wa .1 footit:g subgrade are not yet prepared for footings. I also observed the south central slab arca which was overexcavated. As per my recommendations a non-woven filter fabr .c had been placed on the exposed subgrade, with asphalt :oak installed and comp.tcted to curretn grade which is approximatel, 8 inches lower than finished sub rade. I spoke with Dennis and I will return tommorro7 to evaluate snore footing subgrade unless called to cancel. TTNc.report prcaentt opinions formed as a result of nur otiscrmitionot at artivlNas relating to gt<.echnlrnl engineering We rely on the eorr-(ttor to comply wllh the plans and 9p"mcatlnns thrnwoout the.duration of the proirct Irrespertive of the prrocnee of our reps sentative. our work does nor!nrlude supervlsl^- vrectlor of The actual warty at the contractor.his employees or agrnta, Our flrm will not be responsible for fob or,tt! safety on this crolect. Attachments: Ken Franceschi- Franceschi Properties Signed: Dis lq Stack - Yorke A Curtis 12-29-93 14:49 $1 503 620 5940 GEO ENGINEERS CITY OF TIGARD Z005 file Number300W 902 FIELD MPORT 34"-003 Geo Engineers Project Daic: 734 5W Bridgeport Road Franceschi Off Xe Building 12/24/93 Portland, Oregon 97124 o"n� Report Number: _ (503) 67A-9274 Franceschi Pro )ertiec - 5 prepared ny, — Locadon: ArrW: _ Page: Don Rondema, P.E. Tigard off HWY 99W 1 of 1 purpose of Matt Weather. Departure: Permit Nurnoer: observe footing subgrade_ Cool and fog 1 arrived on-site to observe the footing subgrade. The footing subgrade on the south side had been ovFrexcavated and asph,flt rock has been installed and compacted to footing subgrade. The material alrpeared compact. The western footing area was dug down @ six feet in the ceittral portion where loose pit run rock was encountered, This area should be bac':filled with the asphalt rock and comuacted in multiple lifts. The first lift sl►ould be three feet thick to prevent pumping the wet subgrade, with one foo : thick lifts there.;fter. The slab has had approximately 6 inches of rock pliced over it with moderate compaction apparent. Gregory Pacific stated teat when the total one foot thickness is placed, the entire lift will be heavily compacted. Gregory Pacific said the electrical conduit en:ountered near the western footing subgrade has delayed the schedule for footing :ancrete, which is currently planned for Wednesday, Dec. 29. I'll return Tiesday to observe progress. This report presents evinlnns formed as a recur of our observetlnns rr acrhdtles relating to go,trchnical englnoering, Wr,rely an the cnntrsrtnr to cnmply with the plans and specrrcatlona throughout the duration of the project 1fre6peritve of the presenre of our repr serriAtive. Out work doee not Include supervision of direction of the actual work of the conhaetor,his employees or agents. our tlrm will not he resonns!blr for)ob or or safety on this project Attachments: Ken Franceschi- Franceschi Propertic s Signpd: I DiS 1FR- Stack - Yorke g Curtis -- i2-29.93 14:50 $1 503 620 5940 GEO ENGINEERS CITY OF TIGARD Z006 Re Number FIELD REPORT 3040-003 Geo Enoneers Project. Date: 7504 SW Bridgeport Road Franceschi Of:ice Building 12/28/93 Portland, Oregon 97224 OwMr Report Number: (503) 624-9274 Franceschi Pr�perties 6 Prepared By: Location: Arrival- Pape: Don Rondema, P.E. Tigard off HWl 99W 1 of 1 Purpose of Vlslt Weather Departure' permit Number; observe footing subgrade I arrived on-site to observe the remainirg footing subgrade which was completed at the end of last week. The southfft-n continuous footing has two remaining section to be cut down an additional . 6-8 inches, and Dennis stated he would install the asphalt rock and compact it back up to grade. This is the only area remaining which in not prepared for footings. The remainder of the footing subgrade haF been prepared in accordaitce with our geotechnical report (dated April 30, 1993) and is suitable for fo+tndation support. I will return to the site on Thursday to obse •ve the final portion of the southern footing .subgrade. Distribution: Ken Franceschi- Franceschi Properties George Steele - City of Tigard Damien Stack Yorke 6 Curtis Ibis report prascnta opinions tnrmerl as a esult of our observatlona of arilvitica relating to gr mechnical engineering. We rely on the contractor to comply wrtn the plans and spedf7cauons throughout the duration of the project Irrcepcalvc of the presence of our reF eeantative. Our work doc'not Includr supervfeioi,nr direr+Ion of the actual work of the cnntractor.his employees ar agent;, Chir Ilrrit wfll nil be respena,ble or Job or sl a tWety on this project. Attachments Distribution: Pile Number 00 FIELD REPORT 3040-003 Geo\/Engineers Pruject: Date: 7504 SW Bridgeport Road Franceschi Office Building 12/28/93 Portland, Oregon 97224 Owner: Report Number: (503) 624-9274 Franceschi Properties 6 Prepared By: Location: Arrival: Passe: Don Rondema, P.E. Tigard off HWY 99W 1 of 1 Purpose of Visit: Weather: Departure: Permit Number: observe footing subgrade ��y I arrived on-site to observe the remaining footing subgrade which was completed at the end of last week. The southern continuous footing has two remaining section to be cut down an additional 6-8 inches, and Dennis stated he would install the asphalt rock and compact it back up to gr- 'e. This is the only area remaining which is not prepared for footings. Th -emainder of the footing subgrade has been prepared in accordance with our reotechn.ical report (dated April 30, 1993) and is suitable for foundation support. I will return to the site on Thursday to observe the final portion of the southern footing subgrade. Distribution: Ken Franceschi- Franceschi Properties George Steele City of Tigard Damien Stack Yorke & Curtis This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of activities relating to geotechnical engineering. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specifications throughout the duretlen of the project Irrespective of the presence n1 our representative. Our work does not Include supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor,his employees of agents. Our firm will not be responsible for job or cite safety on this project Attachments: i Distribution: Signed:_4_ "-" vW Western Wood Structures, Inc . 20675 SW 105th P.O. Boz 130 Tualatin, 0—gon 97067 II Sq Retail Building Tigard, Oregon JOB NO. : 931185 �1 PROFF nn GI N �fA 1 1931 C. G\\- EvF. r>ATF- 30 95 The attached cal cul a-.,ions ( 1 sheets) show the span and Ioading conditions and .joist selection for the above raferenced project . The engineers stamp is to confirm that these .joists are designed in accordance with published .joist manufacturer ' s specifications. If the loads, spans, or spacings are incorrect or incomplete, notify Western Wood Structures, Inc . immediately. Neither engineer nor Western Wood Stuctures, Inc . can be responsible for the design or manufacture of these ,foists if altered or used in any ether manner not shown specifically on these calculations, nor are they responsible for any other portion of the supporting structure. WEST EF A W0013 S_FFRUC_1FUFZF- INC Authorized Willamette Industries Sales Representative FROJEC"J : Retail Buildincl j 0 EA 1\1 0. ':331 18"1 DESIGNER: VBF DAT1_ : 1.21/22/93 GHEEI MARK RI FFT')DLJ1'_1 LOAD INC-1 WITH T01-AL LOAD DI0Gr-?AM AND MAXIMUM 1341E.*-` AND MOMENT) W = 160 F,I...F DI..- t- 1"; I!-'SF' LL. : Z'35 1:"SF r1-'1J.D= 40 IN = 160 TO 11 1' DL=15 TO 15 PSF 1_1__='25 TO 65 PSF TRID---::: 49 IN N2(13, W10 V) 29, 1-:'E(-)1.:TIO1',4 2--'475) LDS MOMENT = 19194 FT—LDS RE(;(_'1'ION 3205 LBS D L'.F L E 1'--:T 10 N S L.L = 0. (_-*,31' L/ F)5 3 TL. - 0. `-),-V' L/ 372 USE 26 INCH WSI-424(2100F) @ 48 IN O/C *** i15% LOAD DURATION FAIIJOR USED OLLOWOPLE ;31-AEOF? AND 1110MENJ ALLOWABLE SHEAF: 3'-j00# 1. x I o" 3657 ALLOWABLE MOME1,1T 00801 :4 MIN END BEARING LENGTH = 2. 26 in. WEB STIFFENERS REQUIRED CONTINUOUS LATERAL SUPPORT REOID AT TOP EDGE MARK RI PRODUI.-T LOADINi_-1 (.wlTi-1 TOTAL LOAD DIAGRAM AND MAXIMUM SHEAR AND MOMENT) -1 W1 IGE PLF DL -= 13 LI_ PSF 1-1:; IE(= 48 IN W:; TO S220 FL.F.- DL TO 15 F3F LL=25 TO 63 F'SF" 4t] IN .., 160 F1 = 6 223 LD @ 15 F"T (L 1_:= 0 LES) 2500# UNIT' OVER 131—D DDLS P1 W2(13') 29, REACTION 299".3 LDS MOMFNI :20681 FT—LBS R E A c:T ION 3312 LBS D E F L u i*--:T I o iA s 1_1_ 0. :."1 " = L/1106 TL = 0. 51 " = L/ 6,8.12' USE DOUBLE 26 INCH WSI-424(2100F) 1, 15% LOAD DURATION 1=Af.:*TOR USED FOR -)LL[JWAYLE SHEAR AND MOMENT.) ALLOWABLE." SHEAR 70004t EI X 1('f'' 73 1 e4 AL1.._OwABL I' MOMENT :10160' # 1::' X 10"rj: = 2-17. 04 MIN END BEARING LLNGTH = 1 .75 in. WEB STIFFENERS REQ1D AT EXT BEARING LESS 'THAN 2. 14 INCHES CONTINUOUS LATERAL SUPPORT REQ?D AT TOP EDGE This calculation is valid on;y for the loads and spans noted, subject to notes on the attached WWGI COVERSHEET. CITY OF TIOARD BUILDING PERMIT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PERMIT #. . . . . . . : BLIP93-0298 13125 SW Hall Blvd.Tigard,Oregon 97223*8199 (503)639-4171 DATE ISSUED: 11/16/93 PARCEL: IS136DB-00200 SITE ADDRESS. 1 1.59 5 5W PA(._,JFIC F]WY SUBDIVISION. . . . : ZONING: C--G BLOCI... . . . . . . . . . : LOT. . . . . . . . . . . . . REISSUE: FLOOR AREAS 17 XTERIOR WALL CONSTRUCTION-- CLASS OF WORK. :NEW FIRST. . . . :5145 sf N: IHR S: E: 1HR W: TYPE OF USE. . . :COM SECOND. . . . sf PROTECT TYPE OF CONST. :5N THIRD. . . . : sf N.-Y 5: E.-Y W: OCCUPANCY GRP. :B'2' TOTAL-----------: 5145 s f ROOF' CONST:B FIRE RET? : Y OCCUPANCY LOAD: 170 BASEMENT. : sf AREA SEP. RATED: STOR. : 1 HT. : 17 ft GARAGE. . . : sf OCCU SEP. RATED: BSMT? : MEZZ? REDD SETBACKS---------------- FLOOR LOAD. . . . : psf LEFT: ft RGHT: ft FIR SPKL: SMOK DET. . : DWELLING UNITS: FRNT: ft REAR: ft F 7 IR ALRM: HNDICP ACC:Y SEDRMS: BATHS: IMF, SURFACE: 12'085 PRO CORR: PARKING: VALUE. $ , 158415 Remarks : Francesch i Property- new retail sales building (furniture Unly part o f east wall is 1-hr fire-rated. Storm drain credits applied from demo permit Owner: __.___.__.________._______._________.______________ FEES FRANUP'SCHI PROPERTIES type amount by date reept 600 THIRD STREET PRMT $ 580. 50 JH 11/16/93 -- PLCK $ 377. 33 - 06/29/93 93-24181*7 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94107 5PCT $ 29. 03 J11 11/16/93 -- Phone Phone TIF $ 808. 00 JH 11/16/93 - SSDC $ 0. 00 'PA 11/16/93 - COnt r a(7t Or- —————---——- - - CONTRACTOR NOT ON FILE Phone ff. $ 1*794. 86 TOTAL q REQUIRED INSPECTIONS This permit is issued subject to the regulations contained in the Foot/Found Insp Tigard Municipal Code, State of Dre. Specialty Codes and all other Glab Insp applicable laws. All work rill be done in accordance, with Masonry Insp approved plans. This p@rvit will expire if wore( is not started Framing Insp within 180 days of issuance, or if work is suspended for more Roof nailng Insp than 180 days. Insulation Insp Gyp Board Insp Susp Ceilnq Insp A P,:"-/srJwlk Insp Permittee Sign t, -I— rf i S(2. Inspection Final Inspection Issued Sy: Call for inspection 6394175 L SEWER CONNECTION CITY OF TIGARD PERMIT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D p R``TjNT PERMIT #. . . . . . . : SWR93-0472 13125 3W NNI Blvd.Tigard,Oregon p7223.91m' 5631 e3p-+1171 DATE ISSUED: 11/16/93 PARCEL: 1S136DB-00200 SITE ADDRESS. . . : 11595 SW PACIFIC HWY SUBDIVISION. . . . : ZONING: C--G BLOCK. . . . . . . . . . . LOT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . TENANT NAME. . . . . : USA NO. . . . . . . . . . : FIXTURE UNITS. . . :9 CLASS OF WORK. . . :NEW DWELLING UNITS. . : 1 TYPE OF USE. . . . . :COM NO. OF BUILDINGS: INSTALL TYPE. . . . :BUSWR IMPERV SURFACE. . : 12085 : sf Rem,-rks : Franceschi Property-- new retai 1 sales bl_iilding (f1.trniture) . Only part o f' east wall is 1-hr fire-rated. DU credit applied from demo permit ZONE: C-_6 (General Commercial ) . WCTM 151. 36DB, tax lot Owner: ___.._____.______.___.._._._..__..__....__.._.__........_._._.---._.._____..------_.._.___.___ FEES -----------_--_. FRANCESC14I PROPERTIES type .makint by date recpt 600 THIRD STREET PRMT 4, 0. 00 JH 11/16/93 - INSP 45. OIL' iH 11/16/93 - SAN FRANCISCO CA 94107 Phone #: Contractor: CONTRACTOR NOT ON FILE Phone #: S 45. 00 TOTAL Reg #. . . REQUIRED INSPECTIONS This Applicant agrees to comply with all the rules and regulations Sewer Inspection of the Unified Sewage Agency. The permit expires 186 days from the date issued. The total amount paid will :e forfeited if the permit expires. The Agency does not guarantee the ---curacy of the side sewer laterals. If the sewer is not .ocated at t.:o measerzment given, the installer shall prospect 3 feet in all directions from the distance given. If not so located, the installer shall purchase a "Tap and Side Sewer" permit and the Agency will install a lateral. Permittee S i q 1 t_i e d B Y Call for inspection - 639-4175 l� i r(�! A1112 %W IIa1113Mt PLNCK/RECT #CITY O TI V AR PERMIT # U - c�-�- COMMI NITYI)fyI;LOPMFNTDEi'ARTMENT Tsprd.OTeg n97u3 (501)6391171 DAZE ISSUED JOB ADDRESS: TAX M/1P/I.OT _� -#sy SUB: _ - LOl: LAND US!.: VALUATION: 4 t - .., OWNER SPE AL NUT �h NAME: REISSUE OF: -�.�.�.�.---- •' �L��L _ ADDRESS: y�— LAST REISSUE: Cj q I O 7---- FLOOD PLAIN/ PHONE: -�_t- __ SENSITIVE LAND: CONTRACTOR APPROVALS RE UQ I RED NAME: _ _-� � �1�_ � _T_'----- - PLANNING: -- ADDRESS: J ENGINEERING: - FIRE DEPT: PHONE:— ___ __ OTHER: CONTR. BOARD #: EXP DATE: —` ITEMS REQUIRED SUBCONTRACTORS: PLUMB: _ LIST/SUBCONTRACTORS: _ MECH: _ ^-_ --- _ _ BUS TAX: _ — ARCH ENGINEER CALCULATIONS: - NAME: ____O �_ -- TRUSS DETAILS: ADDRESS: �,n7,� W �/�rJ 5FO OTHER: _ ----- 12 PHONE: - ----- PROPOSED BLDG. USE: r COMMENTS: APPI"[ .AN*SI IATUR Received By: �_ _ Date Received: PERMIT # ACCT # DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT PD. BAL. DUE ��P ✓'�`�� 10-432 00 Building Permit Fees cc 5`;G.SJ 10-431 00 Plumbing Permit Fees — _ — - 10-431 01 Mechanical Permit Fees — 10-230 01 State Building Tax (5%) ;� ' �`3 Building P1 umb i ng Mechanical 7.317, 3� 10-433 00 Plans Check Fee .�_U .ACL -- Building Plumbing Mechanical 10-230 OG Fire — �: 30-202 00 Sewer Connection ---- , 30-444 00 Sewer Inspectiin — 25-448-02 Commercial TIF Fins 5&6V,6 25-448-04 Industrial TIF Fees 25-448-06 Institutional TIF Fees _ 25-448-03 Office TIF Fees - 25-448-01 Residential Traffic Fees 25-448-05 Mass Transit TIF Fees 52-449 00 Parks System Dev Charge (PDC) _ 31.-450 00 Sturm Drainage Syst Dev Chrn (SSDC) 24-445-01 Water Quality (Fee in lieu of) _ _ �_- 24-445-02 Water Quantity (Fee in lieu of) TOTAL __--- nm/3587P.WPF f:I T Y M T'I L3At?D — RF:t t I PT" OF PAYMf N T R(.OF I P*T NO. t93--P45989 CHECK AMC.1UN't a V535. 66 l 14AME a f-RANC';E:fi1;H I PROPERTIES CASH AMOUNT a 0. 00 l WU).)FtF:EiS a ,37 SAN MATEDC".tlUFi'T Pf4YMEN'I 1)HU: a 1 1/1(,/9;3 F;u>•+uIVIbIt,N SAN RAFAE L, CA 9490:3-- F'URF'M.-. OF PAYMf NT ( M11(IN I 14411) PLIRE'NA III I.41YMI- N f AM(11 IN I Pi-11 1) VitI 11 U I NU PfF- tM NUP93 0i"48 580. 50 s I . Ml 1!1 T) I I1• R P.9. 03, I�I._WN CHECK Ft 7.1. 1.,5 SI:W►-It [Irl:it-►,t; I 4b. 11116 1 A IMM(,R1,1AL. TIF F'E;h Fry 566. 0(4 00 11595 SW PACIFIC HWY. I L t IL AMOUN l !'A 11:) ) 119 31".). 66 i I I 1 UN'F 1 ED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASH 1 NG'T1ON COUNTY FIXTURE UNIT RATINGS TOTAL TOTAL FIXTURE VALUE NUMBER NUMBER BAPTISTRY/PUNT 4 BA.71.1 - T tm/SHOWER 4 -` - JACUZ/W APL 4 CUSPIDOR/WATER ASF' I 01SHWASHER - OONAER 4 - DOPIEST 2 OR INKING FOUNTAIN 1 FLOOR GRAIN - 2 INCH 2 � • 3 INCH 3 4 INCH 6 GARBAGE DISPOSAL - OOM (TSO 3A HP) 16 - Oz*w(71O S Pip) 32 - IND (OVER S HP) 49 OIL SEP (GAS ST-) 6 SHDWER - GANG 1 - STALL 2 SIM - BAR 2 (� - BRADLEY S - CONAERC I AL 3 - SERVICE 3 WASHER. CLOTHES 6 WATER EXT 6 WATER CLASET 6 I /` URINAL 6 L Fx value this ten c FSU - this tenant Run. fx value - bldg Run. EDU - bldg. Sewer permit # :� DATE � 1 NSP- lye, TOTAL BUSINESS / )anCPSra 11416"'1 EDU ADDRESS /1 y> !S SL✓ %rJ(` ti PERMIT NO. _ CL�VfY'TED FF1nM TAX MAP(LOT 73-2S R83 Fonn 2a SUMMARY Project 1, Project name V For building agency use only 2. Project address 11"5 CAVIIP&— Building permit number ` 3. City/town -t-� Plan checked by .4. Building area(st) 5029 Approved by L4"New construction Notes and comments: New addition Interior remodel — Attached Compliance paths for new or alterations to Compliance path for new or alterations to lighting Forms exterior Widing envelope. Check only one: systems: orm 3a r-,/dorm 5a Check boxes to L Presciptive Path [✓ interior Lighting Power indicated r1 Form 3b Form 5b attached forms L 1 Component Performance Path u Interior Switching and Luminaire Count Compliance path for new or alterations to HVAC r- -Form 5c and plumbing systems: �✓ Exterior Lighting r—,Form 4a �✓ Systems Other iel -- - --- -- (ti) 11 ---- --- - - DOC _ r#of Pages Description of Document menta Enter all supporting calculations, test reports and catalog cuts. Applicant 5. Name of applicant cu�'N �� 8. Firm/company 6 — 6. Representing OW►4tj2_ 9. Telephone number 2Za•-��4� 7. Signature 's — - 10. Date `p ,1�j-CI!, i'()1'111 Li PRESCRIPTIVE PATH Building AreasAreas 1. Roof area(sf) -�2-cl 4. Wall area(st) AC1'� 15tgj 2. Skylight area(sf) �j�. 5. Glazing area(sf) 3. Divide line 2 by line 1. Use this j 6. Divide line 5 by line 4. Use this value for your Actual Percent Skylight value for your Actual Percent Glazing Or 10 Climate Compliance Criteria A 8 C D E F G Actual Zone 1 Values Minimum Single Double Single U-Value Double U-Value U-Value CtVL4'. See figure 3a for Glazing Type Glazed Glazed Glazed 0.5 Glazed 0.6 0.5 climat, zones. Maximum SC Glazing N/A N/A 0.6 0.5 N/A 0.6 SC.e Shading (cooled buildings) Coefficient. Maximum 9% 17% 18% 21% 27% 37% 46% Percent Glazing Fit= Total o 81 Wall Minimum Rt 5 5 10 5 10 10 10 5g1 Resistance. The Minimum Rt I sunt of the Roof/ (without skylight) 13 13 13 13 13 13 13y resistance for all Ceiling Minimum Rt 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 o/the individual ....+ � components of _ _ (up to 3%skylight) the assembly. Slab-on- Minimum R-Value 4 5' 4.5' 4.5' 4.5' 4.5' 4.5' 4.5' '5.8 for heated Grade (unheated slab) -��- slab. Floor Minimum Rt 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 N/a 7. Does design meet target? Enter one of the package letter(A-G)if ail the components meet the criteria. Otherwise try Form 3b. Climate Crrtnpllanee Criteria A B C D E F G Actual Zone 2 Values_ Minimum Single Double Single U-Value Double U-Value U-Value See figure 3a for Glazing Type Glazed Glazed Glazed 0.5Glazed 0.6 0.5 climate zones. Glazing Maximum SC N/A N/A 0.6 0.5 N/A 0.6 0.4 SC-Shading _(cooled buildings) Coefficient. Maximum 5% 9% 1t.%, 21% 24% 29% 36% Percent Glazing Rr- Total Thermal Wall Mirimum Rt 5 5 10 5 1 10 10 10 Resistance. The sum of the Minimum Rt resistance for all of Roof/ (without skylight) 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 the individual Ceiling Minimum Rt components of the 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 assembly. (up to 3%skylight) Slab-on- Minimum R-Value 5.8* 5.8' 5.8' 5.8' 5.8' 5.8' 5.6' '8.2 for heated Grade (unheated slab) slab. Floor Minimum Rt 13 13 13 13 - 371 3 13 8. Does design meet target? Enter one of the package letter(A-G)if all Ill,to components meet the criteria. Otherwise try Form 3b. Envelope slab-on Grade Perimeter insulation installed with minimum total distance Floor of 24 inches per the Code,Section 5303(d) Enver the Manufactured doors and windows are certified and building reference to plans Air Leakage joints are sealed per the Code,Section 5303(e) and specifications -` - Vapor barrier material is rated at one perm or less,and Moisture Control installed per the the Code, Section 5303(f) norset Form 5a INTERIOR LIGHTING POWER Interior -- - -- -_ ------_ (a) (b) (c) -1---(d) 1 (e) Lighting Power Density Floor Area Multiply Power Occupancy Group Space Type (W/sf) (Sf) (r)by(d) Budget 13 2 tom=ra►� ,F p c,�Og(�,'� --- 201 I �P 1. Total Interior Lighting Power Budget(W). Add am01.1.1ts in column(e) 2d c t Interior ( (a) (b) (c) (d) �(e) (f) Optional Control Credits' Lighting Luminaire Description: Lumin- From Quantity (g) (h) (i) (j) PowerI Fixture aire Tab. of Quantity Lum. Lamps Power 5a? Lumi- Multiply Control PAF with Multiply Columns(g) L I.D. Ballasts (W) (Y/N) nacres (c)by(e) Code Value Controls (c)x (h)x(i) through 6)are fW 6 controls. 11G I a (0-T -1 14M controls are used, ` r enter the PAF -- value from Control Code Table below. 1"0P!Al If you have more - �- luminaire —` types/controls or --— rooms than can fit - G on this form,the two or more forms together as shown 1(P below. Identifyeach page by circling the G appropreate tile. 3 - 4 — 5 6 7 2. Total columns(f)&Q) 'T26s 3. Total Adjusted Lighting Power(W). Subtract 2(j)from 2(f) 8 _ -- 4. Does design meet target? Enter"Y"if line 3 is less than line 1. Otherwise,redesign. Control rol _Daylight Sensing Code PAF Other Control Types7 Code _PAF Code On/Off -� —(� 0 10 Programmable Timing P 0.15 Table Multi-Stepper'Dimming M 0.20 Lumen Maintenance L 0.10 Continuous Dimming L 0.30 Occupancy Sensor S 0.30 oroo� r Form 51) INTERIOR SWITCHING & LUMINAIRE COUNT Note f: Check it (a) (b) (c) (d) Count of Interior Nor-exempted Luminaires and Control Type space is under _- 400sfand has o N N 3 R D. 1.D. 1.D. 1.D. 1.D. 1.D. 1.D. I.D. I.D. I.D. 1.D. 1.D. 1.D. individual local o w o 0 0 [A 1 [ $1 f 1 f 1 f 1 f 1 f I [ 1 ( I f 1 [ 1 f 1 f 1 controls. C a c a i? c > aa) (5 Code Code Code Code Code Code Code Code Code Code Code Code Code Note 2. Check if Room Number Dv0Ln 3:tn10 1 Glf 1 [ 1 ( 1 ( Jf 1 ( 1 [ 1 ( 1f 1 [ II 1 space is over 400 or Description I✓) (✓) (✓) sf and has 1 controls to E5 f ✓ 6'1 decrease lighting — power by �,L_ / I one-hall. while Y maintining partial lighting thoughout the space. Note 3: Check if _ space has windows and has controls to turn oil — - - — fixtures nearest to windows. - Column(e),enter _ the luminaire identification number. If - -- lighting control is used,enter the control coda from - -T Control Code Table below. -- - - If you have more - luminaire types/controls or rooms than can fit �- or;this form, file two or more forms — together as shown below. Identify each page by circling the appropreate ---- -- - _ - file. I rfA 18 1C - -- - - 2A 2B 2C 3A3B 3C 4A 4B 4C 1. Total luminaires Control Daylight Sensing_ Code_ Other Control Types _ Code 1 Code On/Off O �� Programmable Timing P 1 Table Multi-Stepped Dimming M Lumen Maintenance dL Continuous Dimming C Occupancy Sensor Form 5c EXTERIOR LIGHTING Power 1. Length of building perimeter(ft) Budget 2. Total Exterior Lighting Power Budget(W). Multiply line 1 by 7.5 Exterior (a) -- (b) — (c) Luminaire C (]Count of Exterior Non exempted Luminaires Count Automatic Lum Lum Lum. Lune. Lum. Lum. Lum. Lum. Type of Controls? 1.D. 1.D. I.D. 1.D. 1.D. 1.D. 1.D. 1.D. 'All extenor Exterior Lighting (Y/N)' ) luminaires must IAMLI.Me UK�— \� have auromatic ((�W 2 p LAii4#� 1 t5 controls --e— s -- e — - — — � 3. Total luminaires Exterior (a) (b) Luminaire Description: T (c) td) (e) (t) Lighting FixtU,e _ Luminaire From xsOa Pr 1_uminaire Lamps Power Table 5a? ^lumber Multiply 1.D. _ Ballasts (W) (YIN) oti Luminaires (c)by(e) LAM V2 � 4. Total Exterior Lighting Power(W). Total amounts in column(f) 5. Does design meet target? Enter"Y"if line 4 is less than!iiie 2. Otherwise, redesign — (Iaso) YhN• TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE AND BEAVERTON FIRE DEPARTMENT • 4755 S.W. Griffith Drive• P.O. Box 4755 a Beaverton, OR 97076• (503) 526-2469• FAX 52(}2538 August 11, 1993 Franceschi Properties 600 Third Street San F.ran:,isco, California 94107 Re: Furniture Store Francesc:hi Properties 1159.5 S.W. Pacific Hwy. 5990D--029-000 Gentlemen: This is a Fire and Life Safety Plan Review and is based on the 1991 editions of the Uniform F re Code (UFC) and those sections of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and Uniform Mechanical Code (UMC) specifically referencing the fire rlepartment, anc' other local ordinances and regulations. Plans are conditionally approved subject to Tigard Building Department requirements and the following items: The tenant space number must be prominently displayed on the street front where it is readily visible to drivers and officers of responding f.ire apparatus and other emergency vehicles. UFC ,.`,t lcr 208 Not less than one (1) approved f '-- cxt:.Anguisher(s) with a rating of not less than (*) shall be provided for erch (**) squaie foot of floor area or fraction thereof. The travel distance to an extinguisher from any portion of the building, shall not exceed 75 feet . UFC Su-.7. 10.303 (*) 2A10B:C - Light and Ordinary Hazard 4A10B:C - Extra Hazard (**) 3, 000 - Light Hazarc.i 1, 500 - Ordinary Hazard 1, 000 - Extra Hazard "Working"Smoke Detectors Save Lives Franceschi Properties August_ 11, 1993 Page 2 Note: Where flammable or combustible liquids are used, "B" ratings of extinguishers may need to be higher and travel distances shorter. See requirements in National Fire Protection Association Standard 10-1 . Existing fire hydrant does not meet our requirements . Provide additional fire hydrant at southeast entrance (east side) . A fire fighting water supply must be provided for this building. This fire fighting water supply must consist of a standard fire hydrant located within 250 feet of all portions of the .structure as measured along the line of fire apparatus travel . It must pt.-duce a minimum of 1,500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square in:,-h. (Ref. Sec. VIII, Ordinance 90-01, Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue) . Commercial dumpsters and containers with an individual capacity of 1 .5 cubic yards or greater shall not be stored or placed within 5-feet of combuCLible wall openings or combustible roofleave lines. For areas containing dumpsters or containers protected by approved automatic sprinkler systems, the above may be waived. UFC Sec. 11 .201 (d) Approval of submitted plans is not an approval of omissions or oversights by this office or of non- compliance with any applicable regulations of local government . If I can be of any further assistance to you, please feel free to contact me at 526-2469. Sincerely, can E. 'Freitag -� Deputy Fire Marsh DEF:kw cc: Tigard '3uilding Department Oregon Business Architecture T- July 20, 1993 CITY OF TIGARD Daniel. Young OREGON Oregon Business Architecture 621 SVI Alder Street, Suite 530 Portland, OR 97205 Project: Francesc.ci Properties- plan check #6-89C 11595 SW Pacific Highway Subjezt: Building Plan Review ( 1991 UBC with Oregon Amendments) The plans for this project were reviewed for conformity with applicable codes . Please submit the following items for completion of the plan review proceEs at your earliest convenience: � . Submit truss designs for review. F..rxrz_ F1_44 - 4r - 2: Key-locking hardware may be used on the main exit (door #2 only) , if there is a .readily visible, durable sign on or adjacent to the door stating, "THIS DOOR TO REMAIN UNLOCKED DURING BUSINESS HOURS" (section 3304(c) exception) . Provide a drinking fountain per Table 5-E which complies with current ADA requirements . 4,! Submit a typical detail for .installation of the suspended ceiling for seismic zone 3 . / Submit the Oregon energy compliance form for review. Submit plumbing and mechanical plans (including gas piping) for review. Y" The north wall shall have no openings less than 5 feet from the property line and protected openings less than 10 feet from the same property line. Opening protection shall, be by a fire assembly having at least a 3/4 hour fire-rating. Distances shall be measured at right angles from the property line (Table 5-A and footnotes, and section 504(b) ) . !3. Please submit plans for the awning and details for the attachment of the awning to the structure. -1: The north and northeast walls to have parapets per section 1710 . E kJCrrS PAS . �+�'C1aJ E4/A3 1:.0. Since the occupant load is over 50, the two exists shall be placed a distance apart equal to not less than one half of the 13125 SN Hall Blvd„ Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 -- lengLn of the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the building, which is 53 feet (section 3303(c) ) . ��' '=-F_�i'lac? �.�01:- ��G•�'S'"'t't�J =}-�'�....�'!" ,: �]Y Provide illuminated exit ,signs per sections 3313 and 3314 at both exit doors. Provide a handicapped parking sign designated as van accessible (Table 31-A) . ,J,3' Provide moisture control under the slab per section 5303( f) . �IC-? t5lht0 - -;r E �::+�c.C�'r~��,1 'r 'i�cn: ` c3 C. . _1-4-: Provide draft stops per section 2516( f)4B(iii) . Submit a typical 'detail fo'r the verticle rebar with hooks at details 2/S2 an1d�_ yy5/S2 . ✓' ^�. i.-.N�1{�-�'�'� (r�';�Fet��t.-�. hY^�L Y'1 'r �n S:. ftil,.r''1�� h'/�J r. l,&: Cross-grain bending is not allowed for simpson LTT20B straps at details 6/S2, 7/S2, 9/S2, and 10/S2 . The LTT20B straps should be placed on the top of the trusses (on the top plate) . Please make these corrections on the appropriate pages of the drawings and resubmit three copies of each page to the City of Tigard for review. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to calms . Sincerely, Mark Burrows Plans Examiner FAX (503) 684-7297 08/09 12:33 1993 FROM: 503 340 8787 TO: 5036435531 PAGE: 3 AUG-09-1993 12:59 FROM PAC WEST Bb,'FPRINT6408787 TO 6435531 P.03 a r ,( ".k eS PLUMBING , INC . 13„vrR I h r we, 4C.G. fv{VIE t w G 111'L-,4 Phone:(503)W-6441 Fax:(503)610-8787 2110.0 N.E.Cornell Road '� Ntlle=o,OR 97124 08/09 12:34 1993 FROM: 503 640 8787 TO: 5036435531 PAGE: 4 AUG-09-1993 12:59 FROM POC WEST BLUEPRINT6408787 TO 6435531 P.04 a 2 !� �S PLUMBING , INC . 4 wp -614 Q 1 " C ------------ y Phone:(503)64""1 Fax:(503)640-8787 2110-8 N.E.Comell Road H lsborv,OR 97124 TOTAL P.04 08/09 12:33 1993 FROM: 503 640 8787 TO: 5036435531 PAGE: 2 AUG-09-1993 12:58 FROM PAC WEST BLUEPRINT6408787 TO 6435531 P.02 a esPLUMBING , INC . 3 .�'ovT'l�,wnlS (�"oJcKAow ©2l��S J 3"- ell, Phone:(503)648.6441 Far(503)640-8787 2110.0 N.E.C yT*l Road `� HiNSb=,OR 97124 WALKER/DILORE"i"(WYOUNIE9 INC. CONSULTING STRUC-rUM ENGINEEAS M77 6420 SW MCADAM AVE.WHO,PORTLAND,ORF40ON 07201 5=768-393n FAX 8031-M& 929 Job -3 2s ka,iy-A-b ?At-,s-,e- N*-a le Jqb No. Date Transmitted to 0m6o-1, I•:5-cs- A rCiA'TKSEq-M—. Via EnN-,,, Phone with Conference with Field 1 with merno, >< to Subject: v- -T&v.- f'4�a.t�L'Q Mlm r-#k1..1 JrW-r MIS R A!q h JoLs= 1rft0k)c,-r-:;; <-r4t)r—O ge-%,_A ljjyinm Distribution: By: god 986 9NIN33NMn MM 170:61a Me eF -nr