The URL can be used to link to this page

11515 11555 SW DURHAM ROAD A 9 C D E F G �•rv,M i ra..• t ke �, %•76.0 y " �,.• t, -J � r �.: / \ \ f \ c ,; • ^ - \ STS \� 7 �_- -1 ^�-- . • _ "' r ,« a � TV- I t T /If 1 C� \� I r-e RP ry 7ur�1 ��"'s.�' ? tel, i +>� ��9 . % I � G ' 4, V I C N 7 Y M A FGOO' n 1p z_ W 1 / �� _ • !•O.Qy�y + F C .\\ 19 / (� (j I , N� , �Cs,✓1 T 4, t ,> _j s meq. �._. s I �� q ?3 el ANG � s � '4 M+♦ � -- .? � '� ia�, �, " G�1P ut Z L� = g i1 + 11��C tC t�AG toolS9,b� i— t �4 T' S E.w E. �_w`\\`` ��►�v+'�R.Y : .j, I �,� \ 3' . � GX,! '5TOCPvj MW 574E-Fr STA, y 25 E17, I y�T.it I '70. 1Ex' 4T C. ;-r 15" NF--W W I N Az�'� O - M ,Zh _I - LX1sT�811G.S P, - I _ 3 i ------ � 1 I _ - _ I I —_.._.... __ _..._____ ___._ LX _ 7.,5 a I At _ l¢ __ -— _ _ ---- -- —- ___. - 4, — (� —_ I 41 _ Q 4 2 _._... ._ .._ _. _ - _ _ _ ... I N 1:) 4 I , ur 0, Ld - - _. -- --. _ _ T I � ' r _ _ I .._._.—_____.........,-._ _.._....—......•.._.� ._... _ .. .. .'moi I10 10� 40 ylT7, 170 I 'd _ _ _ . - ` 1 .......... L + p0 _: _ _. + oD Ci : f::.Q:LZ:_....:.: - -- — ,;;_ - I ` REFERENCE INFORMATION AND NOTES: DESIGN �!!5: IGA � r-DA7JQ GI—�,� c7 � TCA 40 �U6C, Ges ��L1� OWN E R : SUNDAY CONSUMER INC . SUMME , "'� 3�A� � �' , �I o .z I s -+ O�I�6�~"A� 1�A';; M S � Vi M E IZ, FI E`. I�> TRACED 8 1 3 N. E. D A V I S JOB NO a— ry'� E �L PORTLAND ORE 9 1 2 1 2 ,DoE cvG �-vc s. rR�r C -/S- f�Fr'KFn •-- COMMERC IAL CENTER SHEET --L-- I �I Harris - McMonagle Associates (� � REV. DESCRIPTION SUB. APPR. DATE ` ` ~ ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS REFER TO TRACING FOR LATEST REVISION DATE 8905 S. W, COMMERCIAL STREET I 0 9 —�-�1?, f V� ��, �, 1 7_31'79 TIGARD, OREGON 97223 OF I I I i NMI,,,, _ - -••- n�..+a.«a,p�.as.•� I � 1 I 1 .1 'I `,.,I I"L ,1 f ( 1 IF ---•.-.,..,... I�II I 1 II III sI I I I ( IIIIA'�filI I �IIIIIIII�IIIIliI111I1) (IIIIIIIIIIIf�1I111IIIlIIIIIIIIIIIII`IIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIII'IIII iIIIrIIII�'IIIIIIJIIIFIII111�11► _ `" ji , 1 NOTE: I F THIS M ICROF I L".'Q I Z —3�.�rr.. 4 5 6 h J8 Q 10 if 1 2 ' DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THI J +---''` I THIS NOT IGE. -17 IS DUE T) THF 1, ALITY OF THE ORIC.NAL DRAW I NG. OE 6Z 9Z LZ 9Z SZ bZ EZ 7.Z 12 ' 69 61 131 L I 91 S I 1►1 E,1 ZII 11 01 6 9 L 9 IS- b E Z 1310&20 �✓ ��IIIIIII�nIIInnInullnllnlllnuinlll11111��11I1111I11;lIluFlrnllunlllu�+uI�1111I1t11INIlII1lII1111IIIIlIll�lllll'II111IIIII�IIIIIIIIIlU11I1111IIIIlIIItl�ltltlllllllllllllll'IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IUIIIIIl�IIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIIWIl1�IlIIIIlLll1111!l1I1111IIIIlIII11IWlIIIN a1r9 APRIL 20 1992 � U7 O Lyi F. I CDr Ln " to O O U) 7r � ma G G u� ry Fes• � ro � V) in �v a '1 X t a 11515 — 115.5: SVS DURHAM i�OAD WILLOWBROOK BLSINESS PARK GE►vEZn t, 1 NN ukr�A�'l��l�—AL( UNITS ITENANTS SP 169 88 Permit Nu. 170 88 CITY OF FIGARD SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION The applicant hereby applies for a permit for the work indicated or as shown in this accompanying plans and specifications, SIGN LOCATION ADDRU"S'�".".- 11540 SW Durham Rd. ZONING: C G NAME OF BU5[NFSS: McDonald's APPLICANT/AGENT: Phinn Andreas COMPANY: Ramsey Signs PHONE: 282-4555 The City of Tigard imposes an annual Business Tax which must be kept currant on all persons doing business in the City . Do you r�rklnvsntly have a current Business Tax? yes PROPOSED SIGN: (Chock a!-, many as apply) PERMAWN1 X F RL I f;]AND ING F R k-FWAY TEMPORARY WAH_ X ELECTRONIC, OTHER B11-1,HOARD BALLOON SIGN DIMENSIONS: EXPIRATION DATE: TOTAL SIGN AREA (Sq. Ft. ) . WALL AREA (Sq, rt. ) : _ j_3_q4_ WALL FACE: __ Eamt. & We-gt__ HEIGHT (ft) ; --N/1 - PROJECTION FROM WALL : ILLUMINATION: YES ( X ) NO TYPE: COPY: McDonaid's MATERIALS: EXISTING SIGNS: -_--none ADMIN1STPA1IVF EXCEPTION: APPROVIA) N/A [X ] ARIA HI IGH1 HOW MUCH T C.OMMFNTS: __ n, rtinn_rAf.-these-signs-may--project above--roo-fline PLANNING DEPARTMENT" All sign pormit,s must be accompanied by a scala dr-awing Permit Fee: .$5()..O0...... and plot plan. If work vwthcwized under a sign pormit has not been completed within ninuty days aftow t.hu rlppraved .By.;....._._. issuance of the permit, the permit shall bccomv null Dd.t!1:.__ ..9/29/88 ........ and void. 1tFCFR7C.A1 PIRMII I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE RECORDED MINER OF THL PROPLRIY Rl:QUIRVD: YF:; X) NO 0 r AN AGWA 0 IZED BY THE OWNEOWNER .'��O BUI I DING PLRMI I tee- I?I:QU'IRFD: Y1 No X) Applicant 9 griaturp,--' UL Label is Required Add ro s s 1011 Phuno no Permit No. SP 171 -- 88 CITY 01' VIGARD SIGN PERMIT APPLTCA73ON The applicant liproby applies for a permit for the work indic,41od or- .4.1 shown in Lho accompanying plans and sriecifcations , SIGN LOCATION ADDRI.SS: 11540 SW Durham Rd. ZONING: C G NAME OF BUSINESS: McDonald's APFILICANI/AGEN-1 : Phinn Andreas COMPANY: Ramsey Signs PHONI : 282-4555 The City of Tigard imposes an annual Business Tax which must be kopt current on all persons doing business in the City. Do you progontly have a current Business Tax? 131%0POSED SIGN: (Chock as many as apply) K RMANEN-1 X) F.RLEsTAND-1 NG F RI:VWAY TEMPORARY WALL (X FLECTRON.[C OTHER BILt ROARD HAIA OON SIGN DIMENSIONS: 9' X 7' EXPIRATION DATE: TOTAL SIGN AREA (Sq. Ft. ) : 63 WALL AREA (Sq. Ft. ) : 1394 WALL FACE: east HEIGHT (ft) : N A PROJECTION FROM WALL: I L LUMINAI I ON: YES (X ) NO TYPE: COPY: -- McDonald's "M" logo MATERIW-R: a is EXISTING SIGNS: none ADMINISIRAIIVL UXCIPTION: APPROVED N/A [X] AREA HEIGHT C HOW Ml1CH X, COMMENTS: PLONNING-D.EPARrMLN'T All ,i.#3n pormiLs must be arcomraniod, by fra st-alo drowiiiq Per Vae: $25.00 and plot :)latl- If work authorized under a sign por-Illit R3ceivt No: has riot been complotod within ninoLy days ArLor tht, A p pr9.K90, E3y : DS issuance of the permit, the permit shall becomo nul I Date and kodd. 111CIRICA1 PtRM11 I rrp-PIFY THAT I AM THE RECORDED OWNER OF THE PROPERTY RI (j)OIRI'll: YES ( X ) NO OR AN AGENT IZED BY THE OWNER. fit)I I Ili tol(I III I?M I I It'I'CIA J I R 1 n: Y I NO X ppl icanL' s Si griaturo UL Lable is required Per-mit No. SP 172 —88 CITY OF TIGARD ............... SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION The applicc*,-,L horvby applies for* i permit fur the work indicated or, as shown in Lho acconip5knyir.g Plans and 3p,�cifications. SIGN IGN LOCA110N AD0Ri ,,,,: 11540 SW Durham Rd. ZONING: C - G NAME OF BUSINESS: McDonald APPLICANT/AGENT: Phinn Andrea,,3 COMPANY: Ramsey Signs PHONI 1 282-4555 The City of Tigard imposes an annual Business Tax which must bk? kept current an all persons doing business in the City. Do you presently have a cur-rent Business 1,ax? PROPOSED SIGN: (Check as many as apply) PERMANEN-1 ( X ) FRELSTANDINO ( FREEWAY TEMPORARY ( ) WA t.L ( X ) ELECTRONIC OTHER ( ) B11 LHOARD ( IDAILOON SIGN DIMENSIONS: 91 X 71 EXPIRATION DATE: TOTAL SI( N AREA (Sq. Ft. ) : -6-3 -- WALL AREA (Sq. Ft. ) : —1394--- WALL FACE: HEIGHT (ft) : N A F PROJECTION R&�_4A_j_L NI ILLUMINATION: YES ( X) NO TYPE: COPY: McDonald's I'M" logo MATERIALS: elastic EXISTING SIGNS: none ADMINISTRATIVE EXCEPTION: APPROVED N/A CX] AREA HEIGHT COMMENTS: PLANNING DEPARIMI-NI All sign permits "ItAllt be dccompviniod by a tir.,4wili-I Perini 1. I ov: 88000-_- _ - _.. Re( and plot plan, If work authc.,r,i;,j,tj tjjjtjt�r. a si(jr, oiovpt, py. 1 08 ppr- --No: has riot been complotod within ninety days af'Use- the : issurinco of the permit, their-111ij shall become null D,41o. c1nd void. pL I CIRICA1 (It RM1-1 1 CERTIFY THAT 1 (,M THF RECORDED OWNER OF THE PROPERTY INN (,A)IRI 1); Y1 X No OR AN AGE JUTHORIZED By THE OWNER. BU I I D]NG, P[ 1AM 1 1 7: R I'QU r R F D: Y NO ( X ) Applicant' s Sigh-'Al'ury UL Label is required c e, Addreass a � CITY'OF TINA RD OREGON September 28, 1987 25 Years of Sen4ce 1961-1986 Christy Clague Corbett Properties 11515 SW Durharn Rd . Tigard Ck 97224 re: Structural design of mechanical wells at Willowbrook Business Park Dear Christy: This letter i.s :in regards to the conversation I had with Mr. Bartell, the design engineer of the above described property. un September 21 , 1987 I spoke with Mr. . Bartell concerning the placement of mechanical equipment bel.ng installed on the roofs of all the buildings in the business park. Mr. Bartell stated that any and all equipment placed on the roofs need to be reviewed through his office for structural verification to insure that no overloading of the roof may take place. This is also a requirement in the state building code regulations . If you have any qu�stiono , please contact this office at 639-4171 . Sincerely, Thomas L, Plescher Building Inspector TLP/jdo cc : Mackenzie/Saito & Assoc . Westwood Constructio-, Bewley Mech. I 1317 SW Hall Blvd.,P.O.Box 23397, Tigard,Oregon 97223 (F03)639-4171 --- --- ----- -� Cirf OF InGrAW WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON July 14, 7.980 Mr. Raymond J. Bartel 2515 SE Harrison Milwaukie, Oregon 97222 REFERENCE: SUMMERFIELD COMMERCIAL CENTER, ?,C 5-72 Dear Mr. Bartel: Please be advised that the Tigard Planning Commission at their regular meeting of July 8, 1960, approved your request for a tenant mix of; financ'al, 13%; office, 24%; retail, 63%; and that in the event the applicant desires higher retail occupancy, he should again apply to the Planning Commission and submit an up-dated traffic impart study and bear the cost of any additional traffic signals indi.catr a by the study. If we can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact this office at 639-4171. Sincerel Alder Howard P'Yanning Director. AHvmc NOTE: This ackiiowledcrement must be signed and returned to the City of Tigard, PlannJjiq Departments_, i i Sig at ( Date 12420 S.W. MAIN P.O. BOX 23397 TIGARD, OREGON 97223 PH: 639-4171 SunDay Consumer Inc. Westwood Construction Raymond J. Hartel Construction Report #25 March 26, 1980 Present - Harold Campbell, Westwood Construction Dan Foeller, R.J. Martel. Weather - RF;n. Inspected bottom chord truss deflection on Building Three , which was brought to my attention by Ed Walden. Truss chords were out of line. We decided to brink; chords back into line and brace with 1 X 4's nailed at third points of trusses. Harold staged that the other Buildings are already simil.arl,; braced except MuildinF* Five which will be braced as it progresses. Delivered pri.nt,3 showi.uq; F.-as meter locations on site. A Chante order will be made for mechanical rooms in Buildinr;s Four and five to receive interior w:as meters. .;oristr. uction Report #26 March 28, 1980 Present - Harold ,ampbell, Wdstwaor. Construction Dan Foeller, R.J . Bartel Weather - Cloudy, no rain. Inspected retaining wall footink, steel around Building Four before pour. It was set correctly according to drawin�,s. Discussed truss bracing with Harold and he said he would Tet to it on I.onday, March 31, 1930. SunDay Consumer Inc. Westwood Construction Raymond J. Bartel Construction Report X24 March 24, 1980 Present - Don Phillips, Dave Galvin, Harold Campbell, Ray .3artel Weather - Clear The placement of flat work in and around Buildings One and Two was discussed. Harold Campbell was notified that Westwood Construction g had a Change Order pending for the placement of electrical conduits for project and directory signs. We requested that he insure the coordination of the placement of those conduits prior to the place- ment of any flat work. Dave Galvin requested a drawin:; showing; the location of cat walks and roof hatches. Forms for the placement of foundation vents and r;rills were inspected with some partly assembled. Naterial used for the forms were pressure treated 2 X 121s. The end cuts on the 2 X 12's contained raw wood subject to :rot and the foremen was requested to treat the cut ends with Penta or other equal material prior to placing for concrete pour. Along the west side of Building Four electrical conduit had been damaged in excavetion for the placement of retaining wall footings. Retaining wall footing forms were in place. Later I reviewed tre drawings at the construction trailer because the situation did not seem proper in the field. In discussing with Harold I noted that he had misinter-oreted the drawings and that no retaining wall were to be laced in this g p area. The method of sclvini, the slope from curb to curb was with a landscape bank and a trench drain at the toe of the bank was reviewed. It was requested that th(• ,;rade be re-established and plbsed in the manner in which the drawings had originally shown it. General status of the Buildings is as follows; Buildings One, Two and Three have storey front installed; Buildinr� One nas ;;lass in- stalled; Buildings One and Two soffits are placed and painted and ready to receive to wood soffit facing. Glass is scheduled IMarch 259 1980, for .Building Two. It was requested that the f,lass be field out of the bays that may possibl;, be modified in the area of the dummerfield Fashions Dress Shop, The backfill is complete around Building One; com- plete on the west , south east and :orth sides of Building, iftcee. Material is still stockpiled around tfiree sides of 3uilding Three. Building Four roofing is approximately 801 compete, siding; and trim � is being placed. BuildinG Five truss wort; is close to being; completed. It was determined with our discussion with gill I.cl.ona;,le that ti.9 material on the site was nearing; proper workability to start some grading and filling in between and around Builditigs four and rive. RAYMOND J BARTEL A 1 A AP.CHITECT AND PLANNER 2515 S.E. Harrison MILWAUKIE,OREGON 97222 (503)659-3983 TRANSMITTAL To: '`1 Date: PROJECT: WE ARE FORWARDING _ HEREWITH TINDER SEPARATE COVER PIANS ADDENDUM • SPE CIFICAT IUNS CHANGE ORDER • _, SHOP DRAWINGS DOCUMENTS APPROVAL. REOUESTS _ OTHER RECEIVED COFIES RETURNING COPIES Ct v C' ZY�c f � � �Su��,7cri Sem S s REMARKS / Z�� Su�� C ( �I . y —�- I /kCx�cue�i� ►' 7�0eu�✓ searler cq►-�rcc �� 11-e sem- i � �hc��c .�er am, aoizt Su, � CoNsc ers ec�.l as� ar� �'� 15 ��u.�d ee� '� fii�r:�-�ic�,� Com. .�l�� 41 . i�d cam b , /r zCau l d G�+ tv✓ U' ASIS C SunDay Consumer Inc. Westwood C:onstrur-tioil 3aymond J. Mrtel ConstrucUlon Report #'23 February xco, 1.980 Frc►saw. iia':olr: Gnvjpbe 11 , Westwood Construr,ti.on Wentiu:l Cloudy, 1,11.1d. Thti main purpose of being present on t:jea stir was to cesol%re tice CIAI C" pincewent around Buil,lin ;)rye With Harr i s-Tk 1,1oaa;le -'.r►d Lhe curb contractor. Howuver, while present I resolved twtth Harold the following aaetaeral supervision problems. The shear wail divi.ding Niildin Three must conti.n,ce to the uc,dV.r side of t»it., sheat,►ing. i;e .iIsc.uc 8cd tine shitt.i , 3l a :.AeL of dac)rs to ;:,-ie norta,i of ttel.ev un►cnon's space to sallow adequato room frov the den.16ing w*,11 i.o VIC ,►ext Net '3f doers on the rt:re front. LaLer• that c!t►y I discussed with Dave selvijj the Or07:lem of the roarer returning allczr. ticat� heln'la.� l to SunDay Con,!umar Inc . I indicated that turd had S+.cnDay Ccnsvmer' m secrre► .qry, Carol, � make a meai oW regards to �Aiern s'aa recefved her informt Ion. I as[cdd Dave Galvin to dettrinine what happtned on the job site front Westwuo:' (:onstrtictior. s `.)Ottlt of vie-,,7. SunDay Consumer - ---_- Jebivary 25, 1980 Raymond J. hartel , A. I .A. 25.15 SE Harrison Milwaukie, OR 97222 Dear Mr. Bartel: SunDay Consumer, Inc. has, of this date, entered into a management agreement with the firms of Raymond J. Bartel , A. I.A, Architect and Planner; and Westwood Construction Company with respect to the construction coordination on SunDay Consumer, Inc. 's Summerfield Commercial Center in Tigard, Oregon. SunDay Consumer, Inc. has elected to take this action to more efficiently coordinate the efforts of all the contractors at the Summerfield Commercial Center. As you are aware, Bud Gavi,,io, who functioned for SunDay Consumer, Inc. as General Manager, is no longer with SunDay Consumer, Inc. and, therefore, we feel it necessary to provide a single source of ac�:ountability for the major components involved in the df.velopment of the Summerfield project. To this end, the contracts for construction manage- ment have been entered into with Westood Construction and Raymond J. Bartel . Your centinuPd - -ppraticn in wnrkinq with these two firms will lie deeply apPrec:iatea and we direct and encourage your active participation in fulfilling to nos of both management proposals as outlined below: General Provisions of the Contract with Raymond J. Bartel 1. Coordinate all the work of Harris-McMonagle and Dale ' s Sand and Gravel through Harris-McMonagle kith Westwood Construction for resolution of the best procedure in implententing the work to be done. 2. When necessary, schedule and conduct meetings at which Harris-McMonagle, Dale ' s Sand and Gravel, Westwood Construction and SunDay Consumer, Inc. discuss jointly such matters as procedures, irocesses, problems and scheduling. 815 N.E. Davis • P.O. Box 5555 • Portland, 5 Oregon 97228 • Phone 03) 231-4462 ( Raymond J. Bartel February 25 , 19F Page 2 3. We will monitor a .list of realistic activity sequences and durations of Harris.-McMonagle and Dale 's ,Sand and Gravel through Harris-McMonagle in conjunction with the time schedule of c-)mpletion established by Westwood Construction. 4 . Fie will assist in identi:=ying potential variances between scheduled and probable completion dates as conflicts occur, between Contractor' s work on site. Conflicts will be identified to Westwood Construction and they shall review those conflicts in relationship to their completion srhed,!Ir . 111;.-C a ,- ►;. ,f ' and reviewed as being realistic, Westwood Construction shall notify our office if work on that schedule is not started or completed so that we can recommend actions or ad),.stments to SunDay Consumer, Inc. 5. We will recommend courses of action to SunDay Consumer, Inc. when requirements of a Contract Propossl or Agree- ment. are not being fulfilled. We will dex. :.iop, through the assistance of Harris-McMonagle and Dale 's Sand and Gravel , estimates for complete construction costs of their work. Westwood Construction will assist our office in determing the responsibility of these estimates and shall collect time tickets and assist in the auditing of construction time spent against the cost estimate. 6. if any work in relationship to site utilities and site gradinq becomes placed differently than anticipated or shown, we will recommend necessary and/or desirable changes to SunDay Consumer. , Inc. and assist in negoti- ating cost adjustments as necessary. 7 . WFC wi l l make nerindi ^ inctpPr-t i - - r II,. . , .-�Nr g— A Ilp and Dale ' s Sand and Gravel ' s WU1K. thdL is belny per- formed and advise as to whether we feel it is in com- pliance with normal practices and the intent of the Co,i! rac t Documents. 8. Our work shall be deemed as a coordination management effort and we shall not be responsible for cornstruct;-)n Imeans, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures employed by Harris-McMonagle, Dale' s Sand and Gravel or Westwood Construction in performance of their Contracts and Agreements. We shall not be responsible for the failure of any individuals outside of our office to carry out the work in accordance with prescribed practices and documents. 4 Raymond J. Bartel February 25, 196 Page 3 General Provisions of the Contract with Westwood Construction • 1 • Independent inspection of our work and our subcontractor 's work shall remain the responsibility of Ray Bartel . Ray Bartel will assume responsibility for the supervision and control of Harris-McMonagle 's work that they have, under contract to SunDay Consumer. 3• Ray Bartel shall also assume rvsronsibility throuclh Bi : 1 M,.:A' nay_ le 1 _, i * and Gravel has under contract with SunDay Consumer . 4 . Westwood will hell) coordinate Dale 's Sand and Gravel 's activities on the job by working directly with their on-site representative and Bill McMonagle. We will. keep Ray informed of our directives and get him actively invol%-ecl if probieris arise. Westwood shall m,,ke a schjdule for the completion of bale ' s Sana & Grdvel 's work bs , Nall McMonagle and Dale 's Sand arriidoGravve commfitments from 6• Westwood will c'(. . lect equipment and labor tickets fc�r Dale ' s Sand and Gravel ' s time and material work. The enclosed form (W141) will be user} , Our Job Superin- tendent will s1 in these at the errcl of every workc'dy . The original stall be returned to Dale ' s Sand arid Gravel and rr.},ies shall be forwarded to Ray Bartel every Monda.. afternoon. Westwood will summarize Bill McM(.)ndgle ' s anti Dale ' s Sand and Gravel ' s activities r,n he job each day in 1 ' cin the wall. of the job shriek at Carl, reviewed by Ray Bartel . Ray Will be notified immedi- ately of any unusual activities u.t problems. 8. SunDay Consumer shall notify .in writinq to all involved of the above har. ties arrangements and shall give i,:,y Bartel and Westwood the authority to . new responsibilities . This notificat ,arry o,at t}reir ion shall emphasize the necessity in completinq work in accordance with Westwood ' s Construction schedule. 9. All future work not now under contract with S•.,m Day Consumer will be competitively bid by Westwood 's subcontractors and be handled by Change Order as a part of Westwood ' s contract. s Raymond J . Bartel February 25, 198 Page 4 i As our Summerfield Commercial Center project is moving to the midway point, I would like to express the appreciation of SunDay Consumer, Inc . to all contractors involved for the extension of their time and services to make this project approach the successful completion that appears to be a matter of due course. Should you have any questions re- gardinq the intent of the agreements as outlined above or if you wish to discuss any clarification points , I would suggest that you contact first the management of the contract appropriate and, as a last resort in concert with that management contractor, contact me at SunDay Consumer , Inc. Yours truly , W.W. Manning Secretary-Director SunDay Consumer, Inc. WWM!snb Enclosure 1 . PROPOSAL Project: Summerfield Commercial Center` Pacific 11 way mprovement To-.- Sunday Consumer, Inc. c/o +larris-Mclionagle Associates, Inc. 8905 S. W. Conmrercial Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 The undersigned, hereinafter called the Bidder, declares that the only persons or parties interested in this Proposal are those named herein; that this Proposal is , in all respects, fair and without fraud; that it is made without collusion with any official of the Owner; and that the Proposal is made without any connection or collusion with any person makinq another nrnrnSal nn fl,ie Contract The Bidder further declares that lie has carefully examinrd the Specifications and Plans cobsisting of I sheet for the T. V. Inspection fot he project titled Summerfield Commerclal—Center Sheet I of I Sanitary Sewer Plan & Profileand that he has personally inspected the site; that he has satified himself as to the quantie,. involver, including materials and Equipment and conditions of work involved, including the fact that the description and of the quanties of work and materials, as included herein, — brief and is intended oniy to indicate the general nature of the work and to inden' fy tine said quanties with the detailed requirments of the Plans and Soe,. , fications; and that this Proposal is made according to the Provisions and under the terms rlf the Plans and Specifications which are herby a part of this Prohosil . , ije Bidder further agrees that he ha, exercised his own judgement regarding the interpretation of subsurface information and has utilized all data which he believes pertinent from the Engineer, Owner arca other sources in arriving at his conclusions . The Bidder agrees that if this Proposal is accepted, he will within 10 calander days after notification of acceptance, execute the Contract with trfe Owner; and will , to the extent of his Proposal , furnish all machinery, tools, apparatus, and other means of construction and do the work and furnish all the materials necessary to complete the work in the manner, in the time, and according to the methods as specified in the Plans and Specifications and required by the Engineer thereunder. The Bidder further agrees to begin work within lu days atter the date of execution of the Contract by the Owner. In additionrtTie P dder agrees to complete the insnrction, in all respects, within the number of calendar days after f ,.,, date of the start of inspection as he so sets forth, 10 calendar days. The Bidder further proposes to accept as full payment for the work proposes herein the amounts couiputed based on the following lump sum or unit price amount, it being expressly understood that the unit prices are independent of the exact quantit'es involved. The Bidder agrees that the lump sum prices and the unit pri es repre,,ent a true measure of the labor and materials required to perfonn the work , including all allowances for overhead and profit for each type and unit of work called for in these Contract Documents. ..p- 1 ► 1_Liruary 22, 19$0 SPECIAL PROVISIONS SN- 1 .0 - LOCATION The location of the Pro c.ct is the Sur4vrfiv Id commercial center at W. Facit ; Highway and Durham Road. SP-2.0- DEFINITIONS Owner, -- Sunday Consumer Corp. ingineer- Harris-f-IcMondgle Associates, Inc . ItY_- -City of Tigari SP-3.0- CONTROL of WORK All fork under this contract shall be excused in a manner satisfactory to the City and the Engineer. SP- 4.0 - SCOPE of WORK The work to be done jn0er this contract consists of performing a telev ewirg inspectioli of the Summerfield Commercial Center Sanitary Sewer. This sewer is an 8-inch diame, ,�r line approximately 970 feet long The television Video Tape shall be on a 6-inch diameter reel or of such size and type that can be used on the City's Video Tape v"ewing machine. The television tape shall be furnished to the City and shall became the propert,; of the City. A mi n 1 inum twenty t uu► hour notice sha 1 i br_. y; yr, Y i n,i i nee, grid the City 1.)rior to commencing work. Sp-5.0- PLANS Plans for the sewer line arp shown on a drawing consisting o, one ( 1 ) sheet which bears 'he title: SUMMERFiELD COMMERCIAL CENTER `JANITARV SEWER PLAN b PROFILE • 1 i i i 1 -2 Bid Proposal Unit Unit Total Measure Cost 1 . T V Inspect Sanitary Sewer 971 L.F. 1 .50 L.F. $1 ,456.50 Sunday C ier� Inc. Contractor� C_AL-Ti�OM___.__ _ .__._ , INC. BY: 1 date. �� Date: CI unDey (;anniviier Tm '49twood ",onsLr.w is a o), Constriction ?aeo!-t 024 Ra3nnon.d J. 8,.xtel. February 22, 1.990 F resent - Harold Campt)ell, Westwood C-0antrm-tion Ramond J. Bartel, ikrchitect Veather light rain. <a;TI �T,1a�1 ,°l.th Harold the roofers remiest for a di.fferealty type trim ror mo,-)nnical t: i.nd3Gatef! X would r.eeenrCh lif'.ferent type of cap c..In t,e !�iplied and report back to .e r.onfe�r, Monday, Fobrruikiy- 25, 1980, as to what procedure ,7 take. ''.lte basic stat» ► or the Wildin,m at this Lime is as follr,mss Building Cme is ready for h�c:k-�i.l.l as soon no coordination ►iul.lIIne With ;atil.1Lie4 c ati bo solvec' q?zd rt1rho 'N -med. '+�tti 1 c'_irz iv roofed, v1ded, trr.i,,rA#j and wi.ndow, frames are It, place. bu:iL;-itr►g Two 1v in the process (if betn�a; sided ;wd trl,wwd nind Yoof1ml i.g .cppici.Kia}etely `10 r,,Av► Ie1.o f�,�1.1r1,_'llry T71514! � r,!'►I�.r.? � �? ti:Ot:��yy3��ti� roof paver and lup strips are beix►^ �taac*d cm top of the sheatilIc►g. TU9 procedure is a�Epproxi.rnatel.y 5A complete. Ltutldinj Four xooE trusses alta ill Place., I:iec i-ionic'nt wellr--, are being tramd. Building kivat ,la,:.exienL of floor, ,lacking mid hacrvns 9_s appproxtroately SJR couWleLe. ' alls are itiigT, erected all the y;Okuplated iecli Area. Catierall2y root.' sLom -ire complete around L-ui iding3 Otto and TwQ, SM.itLI-) &GWC : i L4jg&c: t{r It cocaplated. :M ►seri to clarify coudiLlon of vanitar - sewer by T.V. inspection pr Lot to proceeding With permits a►,,' LOR-fill. RECEIVED ELB 19 1980 cL►nUay Cr, .qunier. Inc. CITY OF 1IGARD Westwood Constniction Raymond J. BArtel. Construction R#pport #23 Febrijary 13, Wo Fresaw- - Harold (Aunpbell, WesLwood Construction Bud Taylor, Werntword Conntruct ion Weat llwc - UveressL, Tto rain. 3!oro front is i)etngpplaced in T3uildi�ng One. Roofing neer completion. Fac• trim and ei.diry be�inj n1acead. #v1wmd wi vi Thpj the, material for the Board soffits. it was docennined ghat' broken edges ahall he cut Off, 411 `rut_tg of mAteartal shal.l. be chnmferar! pier the specili�rtion, Roofing a ),)roximat:ely 1/3 ccx►;n1et R on Rui ldin�j TWO. Storm drains near ctwp%te� Tarot-Ind Buildings' One and Tw.). laffit ltghtA being la-: d on IAildi!ta Two; co;al�lete on Building One. K00j" Xboat:hing no rlyP e coxa l r� an �3ui1111ne Three. Building syat:etn not: nailed out as of yet. bui ill Four wall~, teeaes and columns in pplwce. hoof trusses Eaea.n met. Floor d�actct�,gg Oelttg inat:alled on Hujltil.itj \rtr+. Relan+ce df fottn�.laC 1,oil approved for pour oil Ruil,11118 Five. P.eviefmd with electrician Location of all reaw ini►ng LM i . rd units in front of Niilding Two, Building Three and alt walk-way to the north end o r T',,a i ld ing Five, s Sunhay Consumer Inc. Westwood Construction Raymond J. Ertel Con9trvction 14por.L #22 February 4, 19SU Yrr ;: - Hn.t nld C artni:elt, Foreman, Westwood ronstructi.on Veaciter - Clear, eiild Kevi.ewvi' irnnuiation walls for Lhe center portion cif [ve. Ali. 1;LGf.a lent ly placed acid tied. Pour wets &. pruved. Faviewied 1®& bolt splices with I1arold and the Fortemav for frtaster. 11e follc+wieg spacinV, and number Of I)OLLs was &iveao es follows: 3/"" It& Ecl'vVs muiSt ��e uved with Lha+ first ;craw being 5 1/4" clear of each end -splice; iav,i pl l oLlivi• l,$, * xerews Ueing apaced at, a uiinimtmi of 3" eipar.�:. equaling a minimum spliQc of 4.11 1/":"". .or, card -,pl ices to r* er Proam or drawings, Flneement of base.m for b:tllard light fixtn*vet in frort and on the we^t 3i.-dQ of 3%,Aldlr.P Foi r -A•)De'treci. to be t.m high. r'gviewed grades an Orawings and reviewed wi ' Electrician that he had not caugt the fact that the rsidetaa l.k drops cion behind the plantar iarfia in this vici.nIty. I.M.-4 makes f,to9ta pmrticu.lar balta v,:la &pproy.ia"Lely 35" higher than the f int.111 i I kua'ty i? gox.:L% ►;r) I%e. It was t,gt•eed that thr9e ri.xt.,ares would be removed, #or the ur )oses of insuring graft c.o"4111.ts would be rt-ihhed•lnn ancd taa9es uvad ke iat i.n the concrete walk ett the 'Limo if -,mirIT4' the wnika. D. wa= fe 't that this would be the ;gest way ac. insuring exact grade of Uto light bases, 7t..rough weneral obfiervaLlon ,;,' ..te �r©,jet:w%l tiel&Tit car r.uitcliri� ive at the sokii .iaaattst �.oijaer ao"c.ylat a q.,.te&r*d ;:o be incorrecL. 1 t4ied tiw dimension from the cot-nor to :ha ihicli is ap; :c�1y 13 feet from Lite pproper ty l .ue. site itua .Irawlags sho�.r that ll statue to be approximat.e�l.y l.9 f.eet. To all*XLe the grade problem that to Lo occur at, Uiat ,,arLiculti j•o. . 1L t Later notified Uave Galvin ant req •?9ted that ctumfered 6'1,ed D.3 firrin#Y sL-ri a be placed Li the foLu'd ation t4611 at: two facet on c anL a•r horizo itallySnood is to i be Dressitre treated and the disLance t-n he covored in 0 feet in eac� direction frkxr that particular cornPT.'. i SunUay Gonsu ror Inc. Westwood Construction Raymond J. Bartel Cwnstritction Report 021 Jantwxy 21, 198 - Char, su ry and cold- f oLuidat ion steel for .foundation wall pour 0-ii the north half --ji Buildia& Five. fast and beam construction proceeding o-u Building Four. Walls and Mama bein4 placed on Building Three. Roof sheathing L*.Ln& placed on Building Two. Fonfin being placed on Building Chie. T did ageneral. walk-thru of BuilAng One. Reviewed 91tear wall nail-Ing on walls and inspected placement of tP_t.Aion cords H.nd roof` trusses. Generkll_y everything appeared to lie going well and much r,aore smoothl than Building One. Inspeoete�d shear wall. connections on building (ane and found that exten,.Io-ns of shear panel hetUIVOT1 trisses still did not tie from the top cord to th.e hotr..om. Reviewed tho :situation with Harold Gatapbell and he indicated he :ao:ild have Its corrected and hnd improved tit 3!r method, on Ttuildin^ Tiro. i RAL SunDay Constraor Inc. Westwood Construction Raymond J. Bartel Construction Report f'20 January 3, 1980 llrc ne3nt » i. crold Cmnpbell, Vorenvin, ';:eatwood (..,onstrt.iction rbttder - IAght: rain Reviewed the progress of: 'Buildings One rind Two. building One is sheathed. Preparation for the placement is beginning with placement m of ledger strip at bottoof roof line. ►, e► rawrs atilt correcting top cord plate. Discussoet dct.ali of soft transition at (give-in window. Dixcussed thea need for correcting; the alignment of the face and making sure it was true and eiquarm .all the way around Building Unn. Due to the problems of placing the doubles cni.d on building one, it was agreed that; cord shall he placed on the remainet of the buildings prior to the placing of roof 9heathitig. Building,; Two approximately one quarter_ of the roof trusses were its place CNH-nf4 this lrspe*ction. Concrete form work was proceeeding, for the remainder of thea footings fo.7 PAAMing Five . Discussed and verified with the eleectrlci.an the exact placement of parking lot lighting between Nii.ldin&4 one and Two. r SuziDay Consumer Inc. Westwood Construction Raymond J. Bar to l -_oiisLruct.ion Zepart ;;`l� december 27, 1979 Present - Harold Campbell., foreman, tlestwood Construct.lon heather - Cloudy, intermittent hard rami. Discussed with Harold the exact location of ballard light- fixtures and parking .lot lighting fixtures. Requested that all Issues relaLed Lo architectural contract be directed to our office. I Indicated that directing such questions to the Civil Engineer would create nothing but confusion and possible incorrect placement of building or system elements. Entire perimeter wa Lls of Building Two in place. Uiscus.,ted with framing foreman placement of lag screws for tension corals lire over g1u-lam beams. Roof sheathing on Building thie Approximately one-half complete. Plywood was stock-piled on roof in a stack approach.in;, four Lo five feet in height. I indicated to the Foreman that. tine tnisses were not designed for such s concentrated load and that t1.e stacks should be rli splaced im.ediatel.y. Construction Rep, ort P19 December 26, 1979 Present - Harold Campbell , Foreman, 'e9twoo,,' Construction t'pzther - Clear, mild. ;ieviewed the steel placement for the foiindntlon walls on Lhe north- east sections of Building Four. Steel 901, In place, forms were approved for pour. Footing forms were being placed for the uorthenst sections of Building Five. Foundation steel was not yet in place. . heathing wag nearly complete on the roof of Building One, Discus,+ed with the Foreman the fact that the trusses were unsupported at the hip corners. Truss shop drawings indicated the need fur the placement of i structural fascia or structural member from the fully supported truss members to the girder truss. We discussed the placement of a 12 foot long 2X1'2 framing member to b*. placed directly inside °_l.e vertical end cord of truss. reviewed the placement of the top cord directly tiniderneath the top cord of the truss. The tension cord splices were not long enough as placed. It was agreed to replace them with the end spacing dimension ms shown on the drawing!. I stressed the importance of continuing in n straight line thri the shear walls. one angular member of one truss :support was in the way. I indicated that this member was V..ot ueteQsary once the shear wall. struts were in place. Therefore, it was determined to remove thi.a one particular cord. anDay Consuner Inc. ',,estwood Construction Raymond J. Bartel Clonstruction Report #16 December 11, 1979 Present - Bud Taylor, Foreman, Westwood Construction Weather - Cloudy, no rain. Roof trusses f"or Building One were bei:rg set. All trusses for Building One present. out job site. Reviewed with Bud 'Taylor the cost breakdowns and draw requests for each building. Primnry Purpose of the review at the jola site wns to avoid any questions arising from where the materials were stock-piled or what was present on the building per the request. Requested amount seemed in order and they were forwarded to SunDay Consumer for pa,--Ment bud Taylor requested an inspection of foundation steel for b,-.11dingS Three and Four the following morning. Construction Report #17 Peceatber 12, 1979 Present - Bud 'Taylor, Foreman, Westwood Construction, Bill Manning, Fred Meyer Inc. 1�ill McMonagle, Harris-McMonAgle. Weather - Cloudy, light rain. Reviewed foundation steel for foundation walls in Buildin Three. All foundation steel waag in place, neatly tied and properly prepared. Concrete was being, poured to triterior pier. footings. The overall. building foundation was approved as placed with no exoept.iorrs. Reviewed gravel fill that was pibced under the proposed footings Irl the south and east sides of Building Four. The Architect' s office was not consulted prior to placing this gravel although it Was known. tli.gt the foundation excavation was creeper than required. It was noted that the specifications stated clearly "fi.11 under footings with conere4e of required strength -_N earth or gravel fill under fouttngs not permitted." The Foremnn was notified to removegravel and step footings as necessary to place footings on firm bearing groun i. i:evi.ewed the siding invoice with Bill 1,,laanni.ng. Indicated I did noL recognize the gi.gnature of the signes of the receipt billing. Invoice very clearly stated select; tight knot lengths eight to fourteen feet and lodger. . 1 expreAsed my opinion that that was definately "lot, what was delivered to the Bite. Sunbay Consumer Inc. Westwood Construction Raymond J. Bartel Construction Report 417 (Con' t) Wage -2- 1 expressed my coi,cern regarding paving the jot) at the, current status of construction from the Stand point of delay of Weeitwood' portion of the contract and potential damage to the paving. Rill McMonagle later posed the question to Mr. Manning and it was determined to delay the pavii►g until Buildings One, Two, Three and most. likely Four were wAl near completion. The question of relocating, the Fred ►'barer Bus was discussed and examined. Fill McMonagle visually ali. ned the relocation of it to the south of the ,same general vicinity. Ile reviewed thepprocedure of relocat inj_; it with s workman from Dale' s Sand and Gravel. Bill Manning indicated that he would ccwttacL Westwood Construction to have the canopy and supports for the canopy renoved prior to S-niday. Vie shifting of the but; location can be accomadated after 600 Saturday and anist he operational again Monday morning., December 17 , 1179. RECEIVED DEC 12 1�rj CITY OF TIGARD SunDay Consumer Inc. Westwood Construction Raymond J. Bartel C ons trtiction Ra ..ort M !`ec.arnher 7, 1979 L)"d iray3..r . r oreman, wlestwood Construction Weathor varca.st, no rain. I visited the job site to revinw and ins ect the siding material stock piled as it is nearing time that that materint should be del tvere d for ore-staaininr, r.re found four bundles of 1,0 foot loin, #-;-' cruacaneii 61diczg. "fi t-isp*s ;L•ad the siding; on the housing project; ad joiuk:ng the Cuumarcial Center. It appeared to be of thea sa.rm grade and contained many knots per foot, some of them reia3tA.vel y porotic azul pocenr3.,�1.)), operl co water lealra�ge. Full results of my inspection were 1%ter forwarded to Bill planning by teiepboite a ad lF.t.t er. I atiso reviewed the excavatiott stakes for Atildiszg live and found that the aouLh and of the building was in direct line with the center Lhird of the length of the temporary bus used b�, Fred Meyer Savings and Loan, We later found throagh a filephotie call. from All I.16111cnaNMle that the structural fill and grading Kaci not leen done in thin particular vicinity. AfonL; w4.th the oxcn-'rp.Lton depth problems mentioned to me try Give Galvin of �*+stwood Construction 61i s also appeared to be an area In which foiirdaatiou<, warn poing, to have to h3 continued to ,a l.o"r grade from that as orLgirtaal l.y shown in the Pica Locumeait s. It was also noted to Bill M01onagle ir, his Call that because of title five foot heeighL of the wat l in in thi!j Pnrticular vLcinity of the building that tr:e bottom"q of the footings would have to be kava i to prevent later'-. L movement in either direction. Therefore, g2r.erel excavation would be required AS well an a baekltoe gxt+aystion t:o set the footing into the soil for lateral stability. latter that day I discussed the il .oblem of the bits location with Pill Marming. It was discussed that possibly the only place to relocate the bus within Fred Meyer' n own property would be on the future bank site. To make this move and to keep the Fred Meyer Savings and Loan operating it would be necessery to c late the excavation and paving of the }Narking tot from Siimaerf d Drive to the westerly and of the bank site. I discussed the intended foundation pour schedule with Dmri Galvin of Westwood Construct iota and refered that information to :_.ill McMonagle. L'i.11 McMonas4le is awaiting a verification as to the compleLeneaa of trader lalecLrie's work in the vicinity of the parking lots and is to relate as realistic schedule for paving of t1wt portion of the lot to our office. 'I'he importance of insuring the realism of the schedule was expressed. ® RAYMOND J BARTEL A I A ARCHITECT AND PLANNER 2515 S.E. Harrison MILWAUKlE,OREGON 97222 00 (503)859-3988 December 6, 1979 City of Tigard City Hall 12420 S .W. Main Tigard, Oregon 9.7223 Attn: Ed Walden, Building Official Re : Summerfield Commercial Center Dear Ed : After our phone conversation of December 6, 1979, regarding bearing under post and beam splice joints I refered with Bud Taylor foreman for Westwood Construction. We discussed the need for a 4X6 or a precise centered joint, at the beam splices. Mr. . Taylor indicated that they were ordering 4X6 materials for future joints to eleviate the potential .)f any problem in the future over this particular issue. Yours truly, Ray►no d Bartel RJB: llm cc: Dave Galvin :>unT ay Consumer Inc. Westwood Construction Paymond J. Bartel %,arestruction Report $14 't'cember 5, 1979 r!ient - '?yid Te;,Ior. Porerian, f4P_stwood COU.StnIetioli „Sauter Lloiidy, 110 -;tate. r>e►v:lewed the final foundation wall steeal. for Building Two. All 5-eel 1,;Ps placed in can orderly and neat manner and properly installed with the following exceaptions: Two pie deest.xl lessee were lacking one y t-lrr,),) Lie each. Fire wml .l fmindatiror Should not have beaa& pockets. i T requested these t wn corrections to be mule said approved pour for Building Two. Reviewed balan" of form work and footlue, steel for Building Three rcri.rmteer foundation. All sten.l. t,n s prone*rl.y placed eml fmmdAt loo wAq approved .for pour. i3 as is exterior wa l l f rce7ri_:i1; oms ,.omp le.Lee tar Building unk. feud Taylor did not have tenant improvement apace plan for Fred Meyer ",avinrrs and Lomn en the job site, ConstqUOTitly, area of the entry way into the Freed Meyer space was Named solid. I reviewed with him the location ..f thea solid, walls and window wea l l . Be?c.aun. e! an over-head Lraneom panel and soffit will. be required In these areas to be eiue Ontlied from t ru;iseas we muttial.l y decided that Liwt. wail shall reaMll ant U tail-imps are set And hoe O.On tie the :appe pert of the wall to the trueaes. At that time the lower sec:ti.tni of the framing will be r.et*►nve;i. RECEIVED CLEC - 5 1179 CITY OFF T1uARD 3"D aY Consumer It,(-. WesLwood Cor►sLrUctlon Raymond J. hartel. Construction Report x'13 November 28, 11);9 present - BIA Taylor, Foreman, Westwood ConstrucLioi► &rd Waldo Bldg. UMCial , CIL , of Tigard ail Y'oeller, RayItto"d J. Bart,2l . A.I.A. Feather - Cloudy , no rain. "Qviewed steel For las'c phase of f.00tiri8 pour Cor Building Two .31.0n6 column lit►e b . Gminci generally was (" IddY w,iUs no standing wAter. Horizontal steel was in place and workmevi were finishing tieing vertical rods. Steel was clean and neatly placed. Foijzidmt ion was a};Proved for pour. a tl.F.o reviewed foot!ngn for Basil JinR 'Three along the north and Past perimeter. Workman were sti11 placing itee.l at the west of the north wall. All steel. placed was tied neatly a;,d accordance with the Prawiogs and was approved for. pour. Interior steel coluin,ne for Building One were ix) place a►u:l lntearinr gl.�.1-�lAm�s were beim; placed. Ba.1d Taylor asked if Ray had revieweci the bolts detail for top chord. I told him that the det.all as drawn was correct but as an option: our Engineer would wc,rk out a lag screw spacing. I '4est-wood Co,--!,:[ r ction .aymot►r" J. :'orLel CorlsLriicLion Re 0":t 11 November 23 , 19 , " present - Dud Taylor , ForE?,rai,, Wertwood ConsLr pct for Raymor.ra J . DartCl Weather - Dry, cold a►rd t,:i.:: I)' Inspected foundation wall sLeRl in Lhe v'4.cinity of c r,' ,.1►nrts ten b through thirteen, Lhriteen b through f and te„ thro,rp ', tlrirLeen £. till steel was placed and tied nrat.ly and in nccor"dance with the drawings. At a few Paints some dowels were beat a..d too close to t le exterior wall. Requested that t1-.,,3e be sLrai, l-►LenPu and tied. Fo;indeLlon was apprcve�3 for Por. Later that clay it came Lo o Ir. Lr}- Lerltion 0101. the _enr;r:" plates at. steel colu►rms i,, bolldi;-.6 0ite were 3/4" in leu of 1 as sreci f ied o,-► -he dre.win f,s . Mt. welds related Lo those jarticular 1;1ate s and col.,sm:,s were 3/1 b" int 1.ieu of 1/4" as specif ed on the drewiugs. After MUCK with the structu '8 1. erigl , eer a.-.0 L .ve Galvin it ;aas 'determired that beca,:se of Cie coLLfigUraLtoo and pote,.t ial tenants in t, l di.i& One that 3/4" bearing plates would suffice for J►is tr;sta,;ce only. All welds must be ir,srease.i to 1/4" Els shown on the Mrawings Steel shop drawings being returned with a request that they be revised as noted. It was a :n discussed that Westwood Co,.structton' s prnject nanagger or for.ewa�r should review all s,,op drawin s to see i f they �otn,Iy with t,:e �,. Architectural %lz�.a: �i�s specMcations an ' adden�'umG prior to Se,'t:li., them to the Architect' s office for review. 1 1 SunUay C;onsurter. Inc. Westwood Constrictiot► Raymond J. Bartel C.,ar,1strrlct lore keport #11, November 20, 19I9 At the S-Lirmnerf iel(a joi) mite. �-IeAther - Cloudy, no rain. Present - Wd Taylor for Westwood ("011stniction Reviewed st4el for phase two of foundation well hour for Nuilding Two. Vertical anti horizontal steel waq inertly placed. At girder Lruss pedestals, horizontal. tie was missing cn eac*i set of vertical. reinforcing steel. I rer uest.ed It Le corrected. For ease of constr�icti on I i.n�i.cated to tale concrete forommran thSt where temperature Oteel crossed as foot).ng }}��eciestral. and interfered with the column base that. particular bar could be cut. r'ost and taeerni sygte:ti was 90% set on Building One. Floor ztts�.alratinn w,qa being placed. a. SunDay Consuw r Inc. Westwood Construction Raymond J. &4rtel Construction Report #10 ve ' �- Nomber 1S, 1979 , Weather - Cloudy s , Present Dud Taylor, foreman, Westwood Construction Co. ' I inspected the remainder of the foundation wall. for Bui ldin�t One. The forms were neatly placed and secur'aly blocked. All reinforcing ; �. stleel was in place and neatly tied. Building One was approved as installed for concrete pour. wry• ,y I reviewed phase two of the footing pour for. Building Twu. Steel was in place correctly and neatly tied with the except;iore of footing steel on the center eaeAterl projection of the balding. It appeared that the workmen had not yet had time to place prer "ports under that footing steel. T reminded the Forman to insure that that %me done prior to the pour scheduled for the following day. See6nd phase footing pour wens app,aved as placed. t 'SG rx' 7, K io y. RECEIVED NOV 1u1979 CITY OF ;;GARD estwood Construction ,tnymon,i J. eArtel Construction Re ort 09 ,,,amber 1i, 1419 hr,ii:her - r'ioejr, I.�.1 and windy. Frans had been :'l,9ced for approxivaaLQiy one-11alf ref' Cine fouadat lin wa A1 for building :?tw. rteiffor(,In , Nteei mid Leii,L ernl:ure iL,eel was well placed om i tied. vertic.gT reinforcing rods for edeat�al.s had one tie only. I pointed this out t:o t:1a�r4 1,0ramata n1u-i �ndi.cated CiaL all. -iQclegtal. vert.!-:.q!. stnel rmz:;t hAva :1 .,orl.vonLAO Lit ctvery e 1 zhr i:acfae�. l ��sr�in®tl tiw r:o}. r.,�ta bt�s®8 l:or W000 c-OlLrons. Exterior £i.itsI was paint instead of galvan.i.xtrur, as called icor in rhe speci.ficatIons. Cann.' tc ;,at.�r wry a•a acliaQia}e�1 far ;,ia•,�usr�� ai' nbkrlcting ivc►tii ed colimm i�r�we. Later that ar+y .lsve d.slvi:i callad &Lid asked Pel-Wias'`Ju Lo use leases th Ffinint iinl* ic ;h. i revieweA :he specifatlons �.)f tl-,e i.nt: + tI and foun3 it t:;., be a corrosive rasi.srant: po iia;... ' fl) manuf acturcra' 111.;.er&Lu a o 1 dG ,#ad an 1CLQ rs >r)1'c ►1 xxi�t r. flee paint fixai�'�� s aiaprcvel as a .q,:aUgtit.uLQ t)0cauno of Lhe *x.1R►t*j.-jLij of: the MR0 report numR >Qr. 1 discu eav with :)&Vo (;^Lviu the -possibility o" a f roeae t.�eaii.gtat: and tmvoa:row ntght. t ca, a,eat.ctd t,.l►��I: 110 LAt protect the CouctaLe fr: fm-ozing if tike wvjptXrer �jiCt+�t.+sr� nit i future pow rs. a F v � � RAYMOND J BARTEL A 1 A ARCHITECT AND PLANNER 2515 S.E. Harrison MII_WAUKIE,OREGON 97222 00 (503)659-3988 November 5 , 1979 Ckty of Tigard 12420 S.W. Main Tigard, Oregon 9722.3 Attn: Ed Walden Dear Ed: Enclosedplease find copies of Construction Reports for Summerfield Commercial Center. I will be forwarding you copies for your file es the reports are completed. ours truly, Rayrri r arte 1 RJB: Ilm encls. w ■a Id ' r.? Sunl.)ay Consumer Westwood Construction Raymond J. M, rte L Construction Recrt #8 November 5, 1973 Present - Roger Simonattc , Supervisor, testwood Construction Ray' s Concrete Service 'weather - Cloudy, no rain. Inspected the aerimeter footings for Building One, all. steep in place. Ground generally ;.as muddy with standing water in spc►_s. Workmen had done an excellent job of maintaining firm bearing underneath the footings. All steel was in place and tied neativ and clean. General layout of the steel in the forms was excellent. No signs of the Bullding Inspector at the job site were evident. I asked the concrete foreman and Roger Simonatti of Westwood Construction :if the City had been notified. The City iiad been notified Thursday , November 1, 19719. I visited Fd Walden in his office at City Hal.l. Ile reviewed all requests for foundation inspections and found none present. He was extremely Irritated about the fact that concrete was ready to be poured without an insppection. He placed the blame on the Contractor. Mr. Walden ra�diod the inspector for immediate. inspecticm. While ne was absent frcvn the room radioing the inspector I was informed that no one was in Thursday or Friday of last week. I returned to the job site and met the building insppector. He walked the foundation, requested only that the northwest corner be drained in the area of the footing pour. Earlier during the inspection the concrete foreman had indicated that the City of Tigard always required A keyway in the top of the footings. I discussed this with the Buildin Inspector and indicoted that with the vertical dowels in the footings as placed that no keyway was needed. He agreed with me and allowed a concrete pour to proceed r without a keyway. SunDay Consume: Westwood Construction Fiy►non ! J . Bartel Construction Report #7 November 2 , 1.479 Weather. - Cloudy, some light rain. Visited the job site, Building One perimeter footing forms were complete. Workmen were placing steel. Discussed with them thu ►►eed to notify Lige Architect' s office in time to arrange for Carlson Testing Labs to take slump and core samples. Also asked that Lime be allowed for the Architect to itspecL steel placement. Reviewed with the concrete foreman the dimensional placement of the footing piers at the drive-up window for the canopy support cover. Indicated that the placement of those should be in direct alignment with the drive-in window bay. keviewed the project with Bots Santee of the Tigard Water District. fie indicated Lite number of fire hydranLs that would be required and we discussed refinements of the placing of those to allow future Lie to 99E and placement Of north line underneath the existing pavement. He indicated he would coordinate the placement of that north line with Hill McMonagle, tgave him fixture flow output Lo � itie water meters. He indicated he would like to proceed with the project as SOOT► as possible and indi.cated that a fee of $12, 300.00 for placement of water service would be required to be placed on deposit y the Owner. He indicated this was an estimate and any surplus would be refunded. Tho allocations of funds were as follows-: Fire Protection, 2� fire hydrant allocation $6,000.0'); three 1 inch meters at $1,000.00 each and one 2 inch meter. at $3, 30(1 .00. He a1 o indicated that water 1aressure in that line should be expec., eel to he an average of 100 pounds per square inch and would require pressure red►icing valves on the Owners' side of the water meter. SunDay Consumer Inc. Westwood Construction Raymond J. Bartel ' Construction Reort #5 October 29, 1974 Weather - Foggy, no rain. Visited the ,job si.te. Workmen from Ray' s Concrete were placing corner hoards and stringing out the bullding. Discussed probable foundation pour schedule with workmen present. They indicated concrete pour was expected to be Wednesday, October 31 , 1979. Construction Report #E October 30, 1979 Weather - Cloudy and raiding,. Visited the job site. Building Two was be1.nexcavated at that time. Perimeter footing forms for Building Ke were placed. Some steel for column piers i:!!(i 'wen tied anal neatly stacked to the side. 1 Reviewed with Bill McMonagle at his office refinements to foundation elevations as shown on plans to provide positive drainage. As of this date Harris-McMonagle Las all necessary foundationgrade information for all buildings in the project. Discussed with Bill the schedule and placement of water lines on the site . He indicated that the Water Company was designing tl:e lines and that there was no need to bring water lines thro-ugh the site as there was a 12" line surrounding the property on al? sides where public roads exist. He indicated that the runs to the building foundations from Lhe water meters would be greater- Zhao shown on the mechanical engineering drawings. SunDAy Consumer. Westwood Construct-ion Ra}ir,ond J. Martel Construction RP ort 14 Uctober 16 , 1977 At the offices o: Northwest Nat-rral Gas Present - For N.W. Natural Gas was WiI. l Auran, Nick Tintakos and Ken !Meeker Revtewed with 'he (;.4s Co. the status of construction at the construction site, schedule of the placement of buildings and possible gas meter locac'ons. It was determined that gas meters woviu definitely be placed inside Bu ', idings Four and Five and we would verify with them at a future date whether they would be interior meters at Buildings Oise , Two and Three. Area re9liired In each building was determined to be appro)cimately 4X5 with an extertor door and venting top and bottom to extet 'ior. Will Auran was to visit the site NoriJay ani relay informations back to us at a later date . CITY OF TIGARD P.O. Box 23397 12420 S.W. Main Tigard,Oregon 97223 October 25, 1979 Mr. Bud Gavino, Jr. 815 NE Davis Portland, Oregon 97228 Dear Mr. Gavino: I have rezently had an opportCnity to review in some detail the progress, and lack of pro.-re--s, on the Summertield Commercial Center. The following items concern mr., «r,d we should resolve them very soon. 1. The Oreton Department of Transportation ha!, not received a traffic study. You.: proposed traffic patterns wi'_1 not be final until you prove to us that they "work". 2. You need to obtain the necessary right-of-waq dedication in front of the Summerfield Gatehouse so that we can widen Durham Road. 3. Tb- Oregon Department of Transportation needs your storm water detention plan for drainage onto tl,?ir right-o`-way and a report from you on your proposed improvements along 9;4. 4. You need to pursue the purchase of 99`nl property for possible access to the site from the highway. Should we be unable to get the necessary dedicated right-of-way on Durham Road, you may be forced to provide aite mate access/egress to the site. I am concerned that traffic circulation, will become a stumbling block. Mr. Walden has been instructed not to issue any building prfrmits until this issue is resolved and approved by the Oregon Department of. Transportation, Public Works,, and myself. Be advised that further con�'-ruction may be delayed unless you respond to these issues immediately. A die Ho Pla �g Director AHvmc SunDay Consumer Inc . Westwood Construction Raymond J . Martel Construction Rcport #3 October 25, 19`9 location - St.unmerfie l l Cornmerc lal Center Job Site Present - Roger Simonatt-i , Supervisor, Westwood Construction Weather - Partly Cloudy , periods of light rain. Discusst:r'. with Roger �otent �_nl locations of tFmporary power, cutting of gr<!de for_ oundation setting of Btiildi.nf one and Ruildi.ng Two. It was determined to schedule Building Two at :3 later date and to do what possibl� could be done at this time to alleviate the water pondin6 in t �e v1,: inity of Building Two and to prevent any water ponding In Building one. Left the job cite anJ .,isited the office of Bill McMonagle. Uiscussed with B+ j.1 the possil;1ility of draining the foundation hole of Building One to the State Highway dralnnge ditch. Atso requested tha' the building$ site for. Building Two be sloped as snoa as practical to alleviate the water ponding in that viciniiy. 19cussed with Bill McMonagle the problem that setting bac'c the start date of Building Gne had created with particular emphgsis on the fact that no one had been notified that the date had been set back. We discussed the importance of the number of people Involved scheduling their time and the necessity to notify every- one if for any reason anticipated dates are delayed so that all parties involved can reschedule their work. SunDay Consumer Inc. Westwood Construction Raymond J. Bartel Construction Mort #2 October 23, J.979 Weather - Cloudy with some clearing, no rain. Arrived at the construction site at 2 :00I).m. Building One had been staked with sub-grade elevations marked. Survey crew was marking the pperimer.er of Building Two, silb-grade elevation unknown at t11is time. I questioned the field crew as to the location of the excavator. They indicated he was supposed to start at 12 :00 p.m. blit haO not a2rived at that Lime. I reviewed the curbs as cast in place to date. The,,, appeared to be lacking the curb drops fc,r the wheelchair. ramps. I left the job site and visited the offices of lierri.s-McMonagle , Civil Engineers. I discussed the excavation schedc:le with Stu [tato and also the lack of curb drops. lie reviewed the engineering pl.anv, curb drops were F,hown on the engineering plan and lie indicated to me ho would correct the problem iii the field. He called Al Kalcoven at. Dn- l(, ' s Sand and Gravel rinduesL;oned the excavation schedule. He indicated that he anc� Bill McMonagle had resolved that the excavation would occur first thing in the u-orning, October 24, 1919. Upon returning to the office I telephoned Dave Galvin of Westwood Construction and informed him of the change in the excavators' schedL le. SunDay Consumer Inc. Westwood Construction Raymond J. hart-el. Construction Report #'I October 1.9 , 1971, On October 18th and 19th I had contlnu--d conversations with bill McMonagle and [lave Calvin regardingg the excavation for foundations Cor Bu.ildinv- #1 at tl-)e site. I informed Dave Galvin that my feeling reggarding t6 weather and the scheduling of the excavation would make Tuesday a more probable start date for the foundation work. However, ' Jid indicate that I was waiting for confit-nation from Bill McMonagle regardin ,, when the actual excavation could occur. due to the scheduling of equipment and site conditions due to the weather. Dave Galvin questioned the use of foundation drains around a, ' of *he buildings as shown. I reviewed the soils report indicat, ng ground water conditions and reviewed the language of that reuort And those gground water conditions with Bill McMonAgle. It wits his determination that based upon the ►sew grading of the riLe that those ground water conditions were not a problem. However, positive drainage of the crawl space must be mainLatned and connect-ed to the storm sewer. I also discussed with B111 McMonagle the need to be sure all utilities are scheduled and are aware of when paving will occur. u�+rN�'�^'^Rsi#41!'4%':�b�#I.P.Ir`,!G[.r'�A'�F�y 'yq�•{�R+f. w � .�,.. -._ BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CITTIGARD DATE__ ___ 19 THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPLIES FOR API RM1T FOR THE WORK HEREIN INDICATED BUIi_C ER PHONE_.....,.-.r OR AS SHOWN AND APPROVED IN THE ACCOMPANYING PI-ANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. OWNERPHONE_—._-.__ LOT NO._._------ OWNEk JOB ADDRESS _— 'HOME ADDRESS ARCHITECT BUILDER .. _ ADDRESS _ ENGINEER_ DESI_C,NER STRUCTURE_ ❑NEW _❑REMOCEL ❑ADDITION ❑gEPAIR—_]RENEWAL ❑FIRE DAMAGE ❑DEMOLITION ❑ RESIDENCE ❑COMM DEDUCATIONAL ❑GOV'T ❑RELIGIOUS❑PATIO ❑CAR PORT ❑GARAGE _[]STORAGE❑SLAB ❑FENCE ❑BOND MOVING ❑CONDITIONAL USE —❑DESIGN REVIEW []COUNCIL APPROVED ❑SIGNS QCCUPANCY_�V LAND USE ZONE.___ _BLDG,TYPE FIRE ZONE PLAN CHECK BY HEAT _ --- — '.r llt .iii iNiil 7tlL�,;9a 4K QQS-1.O A2_._---- LQQP I.QAR_ _--�_ ►!EIGHT_____-_.. NO.STORKS__-._- EA-- _ t;SL BFI.2H-QQM1z______YA1.I�l.9____._��-_ BUILbING DEPARTMENT SET BACKS FRONT REAR LEFT SIDE RIGHT SIDE Permit -- —_ ------ _- --- --- _ _ THIS PERMIT IS ISSUED SUBJECT 1'0 TIIE NEGULATIONS CONTAINED IN THE PUILDING CODF, ZONING Plan Check REGULATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE C7DES AND ORDINANCES, AND IT IS HEREBY AGREED THAT THE WORK WILL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS ANC SPECIFICATIONS AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH Sub-t0tel ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES. THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT WAIVE — RFnTRICTIVE COVENANTS. CONTRACTOR AND SOB CONTRACTORS TO HAVE CIJRRENT CITY BL'SINESS State Tax LICENSE. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR SEWER, PLUMBING AND HEATING. Total By ---�'-"` APPLICANT CIH AQEN't Approved Receipt No DATE INSP. TYPE INSPECTION REMARKS- PLUMBING DATE { .5 AO's am �QAI�S _ _ 0 k- -�JC2n: Contractor Permit No. Rough-it, -- Fixture Front HEATING Contractor i Permit No. Gas or Oil Rough-in --- ------------ Final - - --------- ----------- SEWER Final — -- —`-- --- DRIVEWAY Final Stunk Drainage iRain Drain)Final Sidewalk Curb&Street Final _ �---� Approach BLDG. DEPT.FINAL TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OCr JPANCY Final — CERTIFICATE OCCUPANCY —� Landscaping Zoning Final 1 i' a 1 j 1�j , e Mit'f'"goo cV1.V A 0-ftA StA 13UII-DING PERMIT API ICATION co FY TIGARD DATE _ dai !r_.. 19 79, - 1'HEUN[)LHs1('%iDNEF'i-;;� :.I ;'IIESFOR APERMITFoH r11EWORK HEREIN INOICATED Eju1LOCHr 77'"rq7/ UR AS SHOWN AND Al PHOVED IN THE ACCOMPANYING P,ANS AND IIPFCIFICATIONS c.vnEFr 2 30- yyG.z ! 3T NO 17oG 1 sl /uD j �+ i)�YA• DEG ''';11 r,r_.a`�IC7F'WODIL 1i0N9�f`{1(�Ifl�r!r)rr r-ts 1(✓O1SE �N f_ N,. 1RUCTURE V•I L.JAOOITION (jWPAIR EIREIIEWAL [-JFIHE GAt"ArE I ] RF.SI,?ENCE OMM UEDU�.A I•)',aL C30OV'T t3RELIG OLS[],IATIO L.JCAR PORT OGARAGE 0StOuAG! ! r n'�.-• B-Z1.``11 11 A+ PD Ri nG rypr FIRE 7hNF � PLANN_CHEChaR, F_%V p-,\\J porm,r T_•V'- `jv1*Ln%*'qt �QV NSaN1�R�y F �'�Or1FN SC14I�:�re •. lldN SCArIN� 'KTQQr1�M__�wsiow . &Otrt.'AYio+ok l_, . �'1 ,S/ls1�N ��Voe r ,cL. pr c". 4 t7CCLA rO'"CA1, J. .�. SEWER QLHVIII 1 OlC Lr'AD HEIGHT NO STORIES AREA NO F .` +•;c1n,•c YL,L� 91J!! CFr 41- SACKS F-RONT REAR �" LEE? SI(lE RI(,HT SIDE r' 1p('tmlt _ �' -IS PERMIT IS ISSUFO SUBJECT TO THE REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN THE BLIftOINC .,Cor 7.•ry ` (Plan ��' •. II / 2 �,- ';IILATIO' S A►:D ALL APPLICARI E <.Ut)FS AND ORDINANCES, AND 11 IS HEPEdY AGgE iK WILL cE DUNE IN ACLUREI4NCE WITH THE PLANS ANO SPECIFICATIO!J$ AND IN CG.•Pl.' 3 t' 1.1. APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDI•vA.NCES THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOTS % `- - STRICTIVE COVENANTS CONTRACTOR AND SUB CONTRACTORS TO HAVE CUAReNT CITY In S',!a Tax I �(jr�, 3` (NSE SEPARATE PERMITS FFnUIRED FUR SEWER PI tINAF!vr, n'vn I" n'ING E, iC# C-40L �r�s,��1Y'A�G"OtiLiW�+or" A: Ili No SDC_, $ - - -,� L� Alit) ,S q 1A �4.4- PDC __ ------ - --.— "I W-E.R.. _C( N E L T I ON I �, Ot",' !�:1 A ems X 4- 2o, u s(o to x G t O SEWER INSPECTIONZ•� O '�� M 'I SWF: R SURCHARGE —' Comments: ----- -- -- -- . -- __�. •� 74 Wyk. o-. -7! _L- /1 ._lam� A � � t STAFF REPORT SITE DESIGN REVIEW September 19, 1979 Tigard City Hall, 12920 SW Main Street DOCKET: Site Design Review (SDR 26-79) Summerfield Commercial Center APPLICANT! Mr. Bud Gavino, Jr. 815 NE Davis Portland, Oregon 97228 LOCATION: Intersection of Pacific Highway and Durham Road (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 10D, Tax Lot 1902) REQUEST: Site plan and design review For Summerfield Commercial Center (Phase I and II) . PREVIOUS ACTION: The Tigard Planning Commission recom.!Lnded approval of the development p an and program for Summerfield on February 6, 1973 and the Council adopted the Commission's recummendation on February 12, 1973 (Reference: 2C 5-72, from Washington County P-R Planned Residential to City of Tigard P-D Planned Development) . The Retirement Center is being developed at this time. The majority of residential development in Summerfield has been completed. There are several apartment units under construction, several single family units and condominium units are being completed currently. This application is for construction of the Commercial Center site. 1 I I SITE PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW: The applicant is proposing to construct Phase I and II of the Suimerfield Commercial Center, a part of the overall Summerfield development scheme. The proposal provides -or a number of commercial and professional office buildings on the subject site. The purpose of this application is to fulfill the intent of Condition Two (Reference: VC 5-72) , which stipulates that all land within the development shall be used for residential and recreational purposes, except that the area designated for commercial i•ses on the site plan may include service and/or professional office uses serving the development. ' ht., Center is located in the northo.ast quadrant of the intersection of Pacific Hiyhway and Durham Road. The commercial site is bounded on the west by Pacific Highway, on the :south by Durham Roacl, and on the southeast. by Summerfield hrir�. The development complies with all setback and landscaping requirements. The parking plan needs to be revised to include parking stalls for the handicapped. STAFF' RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the preliminary site and design plans subject to the following conditions: • MUFF UFF REPORT SITE DESIGN REVIEW SDR 26-79 Page 2 1. Summerfield Drive shall not be utilized as an acCe3s point to the subject site during various pha:•es of construction. The Derham Road Access point shall serve that purpose. 2. The parking plan needs to be revised to include parking spaces for the handicapped as marked on the preliminary site plan. These parking stalls shall be; (a) a minimum of 12 feet in width in order to allow users to maneuver out of vehicles; (b) adequately marked for the handicapped and situated near building entrances to eliminate wheeling or walking behind parked cars; (c) ensure movement free of barriers such as curbs and other abrupt changes in level. 3. Designated painted median/divider shall be deleted and replaced by "raised landscaped median/divider" on Durham Road and Summerfield Drive. 4. The applicant shall obtain a City Street Opening Permit for any work on Summerfield Drive right-of-way (including street islands, driveway aprons, Storm and sanitary coi•►struction, etc.) along with a Washington County Street Opening Permit for any work on S.W. Durham Road right-of-way. 5. A detailed sanitary sewer plan, prepared by a licensed civil engineer, must be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval and the associated fee paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. 6. Oregon Department of Transportation review and approval is required for any work on Pacific Highway right-of-way. 7. The applicant must submit a lighting installation plan for approval prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit. 8. A complete signage program for this project will be submitted for design review. Only one free-standing sign for the entire project will be. allowed. All existing temporary signs must be .removed. 9. The applicant must dedicate an additional 45 feet from center line for the first 100 feet from Summerfield Drive heading west. 10. That the applicant agree to full improvment(s) to Durham Road to City collector street standards along the southern perimeter of the proposed development. 11. NO Ch;Ang o-i.11 he ma(l? to approved pian or specifications unless formal application is made to the appropriate departnr�nt and changes are approved by that department. Application for changes will be made in writing and shall include applicable drawings, engineering specifications and other details requested by the department. No construction shall take place in these instances until after the changes have been approved. Any deviation from this condition will result in the immediate posting of a stop work order on the project or any portion of the project. STAFF REPORT SITE DESIGN REVIEW SOP 2u-79 Page 3 ,� No Occupancy Permits shall be issued until all conditions have been satisfied 19. and approved by th.2 Planning Director and final inspections have been made by the Building Official. No further action will be taken on this project until this document has been signed. NOTE; The following acknowledgement must be signed ar.d returned to the City of Tigard, Planning Department, within fourteen (141 days of your receipt. Failure to return this acknowledyement will result in no further action on this project with regards to issuance of building permits or engineering app ro,ial. • y cr- Signat. a Date - - - Report prepared by; Azam Babar. Approved by; Ald award Planning Intern P1 g Director. HARRIS - McMONAGLE ASSOCIATES 8905 SW Commercial Street TIGARD, OREGON 9?223 ��c 3 i�/�! 1?r (503) 639-3453 1-1 ,oip-12 D © ►-A Ab-o-1. L i 1-- U k ry` T' G- E i G��r'hl �`1 T iL �'�, 1 1 5 S -T-N Y �wE TIER ^uV,>C)y LN ►'t-►E r��.� t.► C- -} f.�Lt.r�l t t-4, i�Yl�ir�1 , �T NE �r`,-�.N ►�O.v� 1�-, t_ S T-",NT- KriN ^t'�-� 1/�4, l-1 S •�N 1 �-1 ra CS '.N 0 <:�a L"i- 13 CALK E Trt E C i y �.�N -.rr�c�R l"L SIGNED----- _ 1 *TTTT't'1 'r' �' r -71 J • v N V J a a e N 7rrrTT*TTSTrrrj7M7777fTjTT'1"T*T*T*1ff",iTntfRgivilwIllIll TT1 y F, y In B r�nnRrtgtnr�mr�nr�rl7mr�rml'r�1�rT O a o o u o O o a o w �• n .n o � -� , .9 L a I � J111�1111�11I1�I111�liII�:III��ItIIY� ��ft�l�l�ljlltit!��tli I LI,ltltl,1,lt�t1 1 i 1 i 1 f 7 n P 4 N � to :i Q �" ti � .� • � � u � � � 1 V a u "JN 13 b " B 8 H a � ffge�i � t Ca aw ar'n" 1� ` n� 8 � y • �t w J r }WMA � � G � � � �l 'x ,.�, 9 A PP w r • ♦ o✓ u J ELGINIURPRALMILK n � ITnTrM1 p w r. 777 h 7 �1, I i ITTr V O o a 0 �+ 'y O O d O n O d ♦} yl 1 16. Q f w d }�V t� �9 �I1f11111�1111�1 �1�llll�llll�ll 11 .Id,l„�.I,LId.I,I I�LI,LLIiLI�l,lil+l I,lil.l.l,1,�i 1,1, I � I , 1 , 1 �.I �1 i 1„J T_ -r• � � w i . 9 = g 1gLk V �! O ♦ J I."ft Q O t� �� 9 _._ J y �I 9 y g q u M�ftg� I t✓ Ci c S J � " b� '� la Y ,♦ .7 Iry a'1. A bill 14) IL IL IJ V e �•yp� '�. � ,j r i�� py9 � � � y � � 1r�' I I I I e � !!`n-! � '^J 1. -: �.iriGl. 5. 4vi ��i�r=♦iy �� _.J._ ._� elgi�ri � 3� t n ppO U 5 N I ao O 61 l'llr7: 1 � 1 11777M77777T I I I I I Ig r n r, o e, m �. r N . •n �. a s o 0 0 � � o U o w r � I IIIIIII 1I11�I111I111lIIlIIIIIIIIIIII�J,LLLIdILl,1.1111111.1.�.1,1.L1.>♦,I�1,I.I.I�ili I�1,I i 1. lyL� I i I I I ��y,1,� � I 11 ( I r n a IL a�' B 5 � {fir a 44 rg F �gR� d9slit N 1 � f t u 1 � ap "I TIP I y III I 77TT 7777779a u T ° d r i 2e 3 l O E t h T �V w lu,hill lilt lilt mbd u,lw iluul,w, ►w,�l r W,w l �w►L�:.��,�.l,,, ►, 1 L L1.1.�� N BA Pi p a i N ,� gad L fit r of ail CL IM C�C L 13 jr ` r u 0.10 ■ 1 4 d.4 wh I ..1W 14 i] V a Adopted 1-1-75 STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Fire 6 Life Safety 07 PLANS REVIEW SECTION Plan Review Numbs C1iECK-MARKED REGULhTIONS, IN ADDITION TO ANY REQ1)IREHFNTS APPEARING ON THE, ATTACHED REVIEW N(Yr1CC', MUST BE INCORPORATED INTO THIS PROJECT. Approval of submitted plans does not constitute approval of any omissions or oversights nor of noncompliance with any applicable regulations of local government that may exceed State requirements. 1. Structure required to be Type _ throughout due to area, height, occupancy, Fire Zone. -- 2. One-hour fire resistance rating required for all interior construction. 3. All living units required to be completely separekted by one-hour fire resistive construction. 4. Exit corridors require separation from any other area by one-hour fire resistive construction. Sec. 3304(g) S. Door assemblies of interior openings to corridors are required to have a fire resistanc9 rating of not less than 20 minutes and must be self-closing or automatic-closing. Reltqhts in corridors require wired qlass set in fixed (steel) framing. See 1973 State Structural Specialty Code, Sections 3304(h) and 4306. 5. Storage rooms, closets, laboratories, shops and areas of similar hazard require separation from other areas by at least cne-hour fire resistive construction. Furnace and boiler rooms require one-hour fire resistive construction. 7. All vertical openings such as stairways, trash chutes, etc., require full enclosure of one-hour, _two-hour fire resistance. Access ways to such shafts requi.•e self- closing and latching Class B fire door issemtilies one-hour rated, one and one-half hour rated. Sec. 1706 ( S� Attic areas require draft barriers as per Sec. 3205, not exceeding each 3,000 square feet. (9,000 square feet where sprinkler protection provided) Sec. 3205 9. Voids created by ceiling-floor cyst%ms require draft barriers not exceeding each 1,000 square feet. Sec. 2517(f) 10. Building projections such as balconies, eaves, overhangs, etc., require fire protection as per 197f State Stru:tural Specialty Code, Section 1710. Fire stops, blocking or framing members pierced for utility runs require packing to equal fire resis'ance prior to ouch piercing. Wood frame construction requires f-restoppinq of bot` vart.ical and horizontal draft openings at maximum intervals of 1.0 feet. Sec. 2517(f) 12. Corridors r^quire at least 6 feet in clear width. Drinking fountains or other equipment may not operate in a manner which would obstruct the minimum 6 foot width. Sec. 3317 13. Handrails aria required on all stairways. Stairways over 44" wide seed handrails on both sides. Sec. 1305 14. Open stair railings and guardrails shall have intermediate rails or closures with no openings large enough to page a 9" sphere. Sec. 1'16 15. Exit doors from lobbies, corridors and rooms with potential occupancies of 50 or more are required to swing in the direction of exit travel. Sec:. 3303 16. Exit doors from lobbies, corridors and assembly areas require panic hardware. Har.tware for all doors required for egress is required to be of simple type having n� pro- virlons for lncking against egress, with obvious method of operation. rlush bolts other than listed automatic are not acceptable. Sec. 3303 (See exception) 1H. At least 44" (inches) in clear width, without projections, is rejuired for exits and patient room doors through which patients must be transported in wheelchairs, stretchers or beds. Sec. 3315 19. Sleeping rooms require at least one window readily openable from inside wi.hout special tools and providing a clear opening of not less than 5.7 square fact. The minimum net clear opening height dimension shall be 24 inches. The minimum net clear opening width dimension shall be 20 inches. Where windows are provided as a means of egress or rescue they shall have a finished sill height not more than 44" (inches) above the floor. RECEIVED (Over) AUG 2 4 1979 CITY OF TIGARD 2.0. Surface flame spread rates of walls and ceilings, minimum requirnmont: stairway - 25, corridors - 75, other rooms - 200. Sec. 4203 21. Combustible acoustical material required to be secured with staples or equivalent metallic holders or a heat resistant adhesil,e capable of withstanding 1000°F for one-half hour. Sec. 4202 22. All curtains, drape4 and sirilar furnishings are required to he noncumbustiblL or rendered and maintained flameproof. Sec. 4205 23. With standard spacing, rows of avats betweer, aisles may not exceed 14. Rows of seats opening onto aisles .it one end only may not exceed 7 sects. Also see continental spacing, Sec. 3313 - 3314 24. Standard seat row spacing must provide a space of at least 12 inches from the back of one seat to the front of the most forward projection of the seat immediately behind. Sec. 3314 25. Posting of capacity of assembly areas as noted is required by State Structural Code, Sec. 3301(j) 26. Heating, cooking, air conditioning and similar ss-vice equipment are required to be approved and listed by a nationally recognized testing agency, such as U.L., Inc., and to be in- stalled in compltarce with agency's specifications and recognized safe practices. The installation of ventilation systems is required to be in substantial conformity with the 1976 Mechanical Specialty Code. Corridors are not acceptable for use an supply or return air plenums. 27. A dust collection system is required for shop areas for nonportable machines emitting or producing duets. (Refs Sec. 1008) Dust collection equipment to be located outside of building or in one-hour separated room equipped with automatic sprinklers. aA.S.M.E. approved pressure relief valves are required for all water heater-, installed either in separate water tank port or in port for hot water line. Shutoff valves may riot be located between a water tank and relief valve. 29. A firefighting water supply is required within 500 feet of building that is capable of producing 500 qpm (minimum) for 10 minutes for each 5,000 square feet of floor area within building up to a ma-timum of 500 qpm for 30 minutes, or provide a 5,000 to 15,000 gallon reserve water supply as required. 30. tnterior wet standpipes at least 2 inches in diameter located and equipped as per Sec. 3804 are required. Couplings and cannections required to be American National Standard Thread. Where standpipes are served by sprinkler piping, see 1973 NFPk Pamphlet 013, 3-7.7. Sec. 3804 31. Appro• . automatic sprinkler protection throughout occupancy is required. 32. Approved automatic sprinklers are required over and under stage and in all auxiliary areas, including dressing rooms, storerooms and workshops. (Sec. 3802) 33. Stage roof ventilators displacing at least 5• of stage floor area, openable by hand from stage floor and by fusible link or other heat activated device, are required. (sec. 3901-06) 34. An approved fire alarm system conforming to 1972 NFPA Pamphlet 472-A with siq_nalm audible throughout building and manual alarm sending stations adjacent to exits from each floor or area are required. 39. 22" % 30" accssn to attic spaces is required per Section 3205. 16. All exit doors and Access ways thereto are required to be identified by approved electrically illuminated signs served by two circuits with one separate from all other circuits. Sec. 3312 37. An emergency power system is required for the gymnasium, auditorium, building to maintain exit illumination for not lees than onw-half hour in event of public utility failure. Sec. 3312 38. Fluoreacent light fixtures installed on combustible surfaces are required to be 11.1,„ Inc., approved for such mounting, or installed to provide at least one and one-half inch air space between the fixture housing and combustible material. in. conformance with all requirements for th� removal of architectural barriers to the handi- capped is required tie c.epl'.ance with Chapter 31. NOTES: 1. Local regulations or insurance standards for most favorable insurance credit may, and often do, exceed these minimum State requirements. 2. This review does not cover O.S.E.P. (O.S.H.A.) requ.lations. 3. This review dyes not cover Msdicere-Medicaid regulations. 4. Oregon State Health Department. .DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE--PLANS REVIEW SECTION NOTICE OF PLANS REVIEW xrmts►t nxxsc eaTT xnmax>BTi r-H tl�x�eaTaT wttJg t9ls2�t `'�� t (THIS IS NOT A BUILDING PERMIT) BLDG 3 r Building SUMMERFIELD COMMERCIAL CEN P_ DU j� ._RQA TI(;A$11 — No. 79-110 Building Address County WASH INGTONOccupancy B-2 Const._.—__—Y?h __.--Sound Value $468,853. Plan roe 336.20 Architect RAYMOND J BARTEL _ _ .__— New Bldg.)JJ Addition ❑ Alteration ❑ Date Received 8/1pp3/��79 ______ Owner NOT SHOWN ,' _____ _ Address _�— _ __—__._, Date Reviewed _LZLL Stories 1 Area _O 209 S. Attic VARIES./_-NLS_.._Fire Wall_ NIS Fir• Escapes -_.N,4S_-Exits __..5 /,.__30___ft. Main Fir. Basement Ht. Slops Tot,Width Stairs NIS /�_— Vert. Shafts / _ Sprinklers __X_..._/ /_tL—. Man. Alarm S.P. Closed Closed No Yes Area Covered Int. Size Ext. Ext. NIS -- Hr. Det. —NL5_ --Floor WOOD Coiling ._s911J5F_ Roof EJ_ZTStr. Member _WOOD Class No. Type Area Covd. Well cover WOOD / M HIr. rm. encl. _. NQS Type flue ..-._N.LS__—. Type Hig. System NIS — Fuel —_bU-S— r.1, Int. The submitted plans have been reviewed for conformity with fire protection statutes and regulatipns of Oregon admin- istered by this office. Items No. 89 11L 17, 26t_28 checked on the enclosed list are applicable. These items and any specially noted provisions must be incorporated into tier, project to meet current fire protection regulations. App vat bf submitted plans is not an approval of omissions or oversights by this office or of noncompliance with any applicable regulations of local qr+vernment. REMARKS: __A/ Lb TI[IS I _g_ IR)�A� _1IFEE_7�_I' 1N__RY� W__COVIRI�G__�{E CQ*]S)RIIGTtON OFA _ NLW BUIL AIN. INDICA2. - THIS REVIEW 16 SAFETY PORTIONS_QIi.�E_1976_F,�I �QrJs?F_SHiTF� QGt�_.STIIUCTURALTESIaTY_C�Eae__ THIS_REVIEW COVERS -- D) GROUP B DIVIS�Q�Z��GI�ANCIF,S__�d?.OAT ]LIN_FIRE_ZONI'L-2 ALIAS_ OF NOT LESS THAN ONE-H0URFIRE-RESL$TIVE CON,gTRU�7J t.�N TA$1st:-��A_a_..__EXCEPT1QNl_.�N F'IRE_ZQN.E_ 2 EXTERIOR WALLS_FRON'1'INCON STREETS OR-,GAJ _5__HAV1Ng P. .�IIDl�i OF AT LEAST 40 FEET MAY BE OF UNPROTECTED CONSTRUCTION. SECTION 2103. �`', Exami�eic_ _PAGE I of 2 Copies to: APYLICANTJ!1&.DEFUTY,FF14,OWNE G.DEPT. FIRE DEPT.tELEC.--_._.—PRS 1 –��– SP*465®5 614 DFPARTMENT OF COMMERtE PLANS RE*IFW SECTION NOTICE OF PLANS REVIEW �aJ Nd[JS1M7576XSERIE O[BEOf78�tlDLN��FIQfiRf�W7G9a (THIS IS NOT A BUILDING PERMIT) BLDG 3 Building _SUMMERFIEL_D COMMERCIAL CENTER DURHAM ROAD, TIGARD do 79-1104 building Addruf ( ' C)_. IN FIRE-RESISTIVE EXTERIOR WALL CONSTRUCTION, THE__FIRE RESISTIVE RATING FMLLBE MAINTAINED FOR SUCH WALLS PASSING THROUGH ATTIC AREAS. SECTION 4304Ca CHEATING APPARA TUSi_WHEN- INSTALLED,. SHALL CON FORM TO_'1 HE REQUIREMENT OF THIS CODE AND___- THE MECHANICAL COCODE. SECTION 1108, F) NO STORAGE OF VOLATILE FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS SHALL BE ALLOWED AND THE HANDLING AND USE O OTHER FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED UNLESS SUCH USE AND HANDLING COMPLY WITH _—UNIFORM BUILDING CODE GTANDARD NO. 10-1 SECTION 1108. F)--PLANS ARE ACCEPTABLE,AS SUBMITTED SUBJECT TO THE REMARKS NOTED_ ABOVE_ AND THE APPROVAL OF ThE AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION. _ PAG!?_ DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE—PIANS REVIEW 11FCIION NOTICE OF PLANS REVIEW )DJ9 NA(A]�X9(/Q7i)C�iIG?EI lial EfLX JPEBN EKI�T A 7005: RNI! If NOT A aUIlDINO PERMIn BLDG 4 9uilding. SUMMRF1ELD COftRCIL h CEI]�ER D�1LS/�i1___R9�Ds_T'1 1 I_ _----------- Na. 79 11 Building �'�"•r �� SEE PLAN DC 3 County WASHINGTONoccupanc, _. B-2 Const. __-1 Sound valva FAR, 14+ RAYMOND J $ARTEL New Bld Addition Altererion Data Received 8/13/79 Architect — g• Lj Owner NOT SHOWN Address . _ __ Date Reviewed . 8/21/79 Stories 1 Area 9609 _NL5_ Atlic YAR L5j N/S Fire Wall,—N/S Fire Escapes N Exits 36 ft. Main Fir. Basement Ht. Stops *� _NLS Tot.Width Stairs �{ S /�` _ Vert. Shahs �/ Sprinkler X—/_-_i US Man. Alarm _N S S.P. NL5J_._JNIS Closed tr Closed No Yet AraCaeered Int. Size F.xt. Fx: J S J Ht. Ods liL.r1__1_=-/ >vr►5-� Floor Ceiling — Roof T�l+%+ Sh Mernber �Q1L Class No. Type Area Covd. Wall cover WOOD J GYP Hit. rm. encl. N9g Type flue N/,^i,Type Hig. System N/S __ Fuel NIS Eat. Int. The submitter; plans have been reviewed for conformity with fire protection statutes and regulations of Oregon admin- istered by ts�,i office. Items No. 11, 17,_ 262 28 checked rn the enclosed list are applicable. Thew! items and any specially noted provisions must be incorporated into the project to meet current fire protection regulations. Approvdf.of submitted plans is not an approval of omissions or ovei5ights Ey this office or of noncompliance with any applicable regulations of local government. REMARKS; A.1-111I I A FIRE ASID AFE SAFETY PLAN_UYI_.EW QQVr ICQUU.UC..QNJ,QE_A NEW BUILDING IN$ICATED TO BE IN FIRE_ZQNz__L—_3jjjS EyIF.3tI�; USED ON 'TEIE__F'1$I< �.bl�. SAFETY PORTIONS OF THE 1976 EDITION SPECIALTY CQD_E. THIS REVIEW COVERS TH -LIMLLONLY- � - 13) GROUP B DTVI_5NU_2_Q_QQ FANCIES LOCATED IN FIRE ZONE_2_5MjL_JjAy EXTERIOR WALLS_Ud_OT LESS THAN ONE•-HQIJR FIRE-gESIST yE CONSTRUCTION, TABLES-A,_ EXCEPTj NO ., IN FIRE_JZQNE� EXTERIOR WALLS FRONTING ON STREETS OR YARDS- HAVING A WIDTH OF-AT_LEAST 40 FEET MAY BE OF UNPROTECTED CONSTRUCTION. SECTION 2203. Examined b� j - PAGE 1 of 2 Copies to: APPLICANT�FTLE,DEPUTYaSf`ieOSJNERRBLDG.DEPT.,FIRE DEPT.EELEC. PRS-7 _ SPraASBs seise DEPARtMENT OF COMMERCE-PIANS REVIEW SECTION NOTICE OF PLANS REVIEW ,� ,� MMNAMKXH XXIKOEJe17 x m NQSPAIQYAEmxrmM (THIS IS NUI A PUIIUING PLRMITI irl,l)G 4 w3ta� Building SUMMERFIELD COMMERCIAL CENTER DURHAM ROAD, TIGARD No. 79-1.104 �+ Building Address C) IN FIRE-RESISTIVE EXTERIOR WALL CCNSTRUCTIOi4,_THE FIRE_RESISTIVE_RATING SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR SUCH WALLS P—ASSING THROUGH ATTIC AREAS. SECTION 4304C. D) HEATING APPARATUS-R_.WHEN INSTALLED, SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENT OF THIS CODE AND THE MECHANICAL CODE. SECTION 1108. _E) NO STORAGE OF VOLATILE FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS SHALL BE ALLOWED AND THE HANDLING AND USE OF OTHER FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED UNLESS SUCH USE AND HANDLING COMM WITH UNIFORM BUILDING CODE STANDARD NO. 10-19 SECTION 1108. F) PLANS ARE ACCEITABLE AS SUBMITTED SUBJECT TO THE _REMARKS NOTED ABOVE AND THE APPROVAL OF THE AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE—PIANS RIVIEw SECTION NOTICE OF PLANS REVIEW ;�1J bM J7�?V'UQi 7C,7mQX:9M 0�1 r(OC f3Rf rii0v�A Tit�< eo (TNI)IS NOT A BUILDING PERMIT) BLDG 5 Building SUrIMERFIELD GOND ERf1 LAAC0NTEg__DURHAMRQAUs_1tQA1W__ __ No. 79-1104 Building Address County WASHINGTON Occupancy B-2 _ Const._.. V—N Sound Value SEE PLAN. 1_0IH nJW PG .I Architect RAY11OND J IIARTEL _ New Bldg. Addition 8/13/79 g �] ❑ Alteration ❑ Date Received __ Owner __ NOT SHOWN Address ._ M — _ Date Reviewed 8/21/79 _ Stories I Are. 12,300 N S Attic VAR1 . NIS Fire Walls NLS Firn Escaper 10 /_ 60 � Main Flt. Dammam Ht. Stops s� ��" Tot.Width Stairs ��y�7_/_ Vert. Shafts N/3 /`__ Sprinkler _X.r/_�� N1j Man. Alarm r b S.P. -RLSj_ — /171.a7 Closed *t '.Iosed No Yes Area Covered , T* Int. Site Ent. E.I. N/S r' - Ht. Det. �J__/ NQS Floor __WQQD _ Ceiling �� _ Ronf 11LE/MStr. Member WOOD Class No. Type Area Covd. Well cover Htr. rm. encl. N I S Type flue �` iL_Type Htg. System NIS Fuel N.'S Est. Int, the submitted plans have been reviewed for conformity with fire protection statutes and regulations of Oregon admin. istered by this office. Items No. _ 8, 11, 17, 26, 28 checked on the enclosed list are applicable. These items and any specially noted provisions must be incorporated into the project to meet current fire protection regulations. Approval of submitted plans is not an approval of omissions or oversights by this office or of noncompliance with any applicable regulations of local government. r REMARKS: A) THIS ISA FIRE AND_LIFE SAFEfiY PLAN ftfV1 W COMR VG ME_Q9MRU_Q ON_OI_A _ NEW BUILDING INUCATEI)_JQ_BE IN FZRE ZQl'U2._�LIS REVIEW IS�ASED ON TIIE FIRE ANLL LIFE SAFETY POR IONS OF THE1 �pITION OE TIiE_ S�AT�OF OREGON ST UCTUEA.L lkLTY CODE, THIS REVIEW CQM5 _10 0 LL ONLY. B CROUP B DIVISION 2 OCCTBANCIES LOCATED-I,[I� ZONE 2 SHALL HAVR EXTERIQR WA. LS OF NOT LESS THAN ONE- UR FIRE-RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION. BLE j-A. EXCEPTION: IN FIRE ZONE _7. EXTERIOR WALLS FRONTING ON STREETS OR_YARQJHAVING A WIDTH OF ASST 40 FEET MAY BE OF UNPROTECTED CONSTRUCTION. SECTION 2203. Examined br- �Q- PACE 1 of 2 Copies to: APPLICANT.FILE,DEPUTY a SFMoOWNER,BLDG.DEPT.IFIRE DEPT.,EL.EC. PRS 7 SP'76585 E1 DEPARTsAF.NT OF COMMERCE—PIANS REVIEiW SECTION NOTICE OF PLANS REVIEW i�Mp%:'Sf7lDE?OEBSt .�IKOtlM6C`PEtiI?Wi(�)o7C8N (TML!IS NOT A BUILDING PERMIT) BLDG 5 Building SUMMERFIELD _COMMERCIAL CENTER DURHAM ROAD, T.IGARD No 79-1104 Building Address C) IN FIRE-RESISTIVE EXTERIOR WALL CONSTRUCTION,__THE FIRE_RESISTIVE RATING SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR SUCH WALLS PASSING THROUGH ATTIC AREAS. SECTION 4304C. D HEATING APPARATUS, WHEN INSTALLED, SHALL CONFORM TO THF REQUIREMENT OF THIS CODE AND THE hIECIIANICAL CODE. SECTION 1108. ___E) NO STORAGE OF VOLATILE FLAMMABLE L_ )QUIDS SHALL BE ALLOWED AND THE HANDLING AND USE OF O'I1IER FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED UNLESS SUCH USE AND HANDLING COMPLY W111i _ UNIFORM BUILDING CODE STANDARD NO. LO-le SECTION 1108. F) PLANS ARE ACCEPTABLE AS SUBMITTED SUBJECT TO THE _REMARKS NOTED AB_0_VE AND THE APPROVAL OF THE AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION. �. __FACE 2 o f 2 U BUILDING PI_HMIT APPLICATION "OF TIGARD DATE._ _. _ _ 19 . __ • THE UNDERSIGNEDHEPEGt APPLIES FOR APERMIT FOR THE WORK HEREIN INDICATED HUILDEt7Phf3t,4r_-.- UR AS SHOWN AND APPROVFD IN TyE Aja MPANYING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. C.INFr?PNrj?4 C400, lo�LfCwQ� �,r Lor NO is �l__ /0 D OWNEP ��1M4 ---- _ —--/�,- CT A F10 R ADDRESSRSTRUCTURE KNEW ❑Fltt.1nDEL ❑ADDITION LIREPAIRI7F F C:4r,+pGErr,�❑ tTE51L,ENCC r]COMM ❑EOUCAt1��►1AL []GOV'T L.JRELIGIOUSLIPAT10 I (_]STOR4GEt �5!•%I -- -OL DG TYPE � ._ ..FIRE ZONy HEAT --- SEWER PERMIT .# . .- _ •- _ __.. �� OCC LOAD FLOOR L. A'1 hiElc-,t,T _ - ---- VRIF5 ,� ARSA •._ NO NEJROOMS_ _VALI,IE gUlcCtl';, DErARrr,Et, ; BACKS FRONT nEAp - LEFT SIDE RIGHT SIDE I; RMIT IS F. UBJECT TO THE REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN THE SUILDINC COVE, 10NIA Plan C' eck - GULATIONS L APPLICABLF, CODES AND ORDINANCES AND IT IS HEREBY AGREED THAT V -- - Rk WILL €!� IN ACCUROANCE WITH THE PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONS AND IN CONIPLIaN .r l TAI I APPL 111BL CODES AND ORDINANCES, THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT OC'tS NOT tY', VENANTS CONTRACTOR AND SUB CONTRACTORS TO HAVE CURPENT CITY RUST Tex _ _ - EF RATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR SEWER. PLUMBING AND HEATING T ,ca' pPPLIC.AN' I'J" 5DC - SI WLR LONNi.E ON 5 SEWER INSPECTION $ SEWER SURCHARGE S Comments: C:Pa. TQC�- �'..►R�z�,.l��`laK I d4 PAO? --ths f 6e q 56 moi_ 16 -, 1 DEP0i:W4T OF COMM E—PIANS REVIBW,)ECT10N NOTICE OF PLANS REVIEW xkr..IAX(NY,XAnY?,8011 —PLANS (THIS IS NOT A SUIIDINO PERMIT) t SUMMERFIEL _ If -CENTER & 2 94E_& DURHAM 11CJ,RD No. 79-r970 . Bui.di•ig — TE Build rtp Address335 00 County WAS1iINGTO. occupancy B�2 Const. V-1� Sound Value 502,500. Plan Fee Architect _ RAYMOND J Bt:IZTEL New Bld Addition ❑ Alteration T] Date Received 6/28179 - Owner .. '1'UAhA DEVELOPi U' CU dress 15300 SW 116TH AVE.11TIGARDDate Reviewed 7/16/79 Sto 1 S1BELOW AttieVARIE J Fite Walls rl S _ Fire Escapes —Al S Exits _N� N. Main Flr. Basement Hi. Stops Tot.Width Stairs /— . Vert. Shaft _ N/S y Sprinklers N/S/_ �/ Man. Alarm N/S S.F. N/S - C jsed Clowd No Yes Area Co,ercd Int. Site Ext c - Floor _ Q�Ceiiinr DRYWALL Roof 2LT-UP Str. Members _ lass No. Type Area Covd. Wall eovgr WOOD DRYIdALIPItr. rm. encl. NIS Type flue N��'_ T—ie Htg. System N/S Fuel Ext. Int. The submitted plans have been reviewed for conformity with fire protection statutes and regulations of Oregon admin- istered by this office. Items No. 17, 26, 28 checked on the enclosed list are applicable. These items and any specially noted provisions must be incorporated into the project to meet current fire protection requlations. Approval of submitted plans is not an approval of omissions or oversights by this office or of noncompliance with any applicable regulations of local qovernment. RFMAkK(;. THIS IS A FIRE & LIFE SA1 T_Y REVIEW ON TH,' SHELL OF TWO BUILDINGS LOCATED IN FIFE ZONE #2. THIS REVIEW WAS BASED ON THE _1976 OREGON STRUCTURAL_SPECIALTY CODE AND FIRE &_LIFE SAFE'T'Y CODES. _ ^^ 2) BUILDING AREAS ARE #1- - 6600 SQUARE FEET; #2 - 131150E SQUARE FEET. Q�ioO _ 3) THIS REVIEW WAS FOR THE SHELL ONLY AND AS IS EXITING IS NOT APPROVED. 4) MECHANICAL AND _VENTILATION MUST COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL AND STATE CODES. 5) PRIOR TO OCCUPANT. OF THE BUILDING OR ANY CONSTRUCTION PAST T11AT SHOWN Ob' THF.S-FYL1Z, APPROVAL SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM AUTHORI'T'IES 11AVING JURISDICTIONe Examined by?/)" Copies to: _A1'PLICANTILE,DEPUTYpSn OWNERIIBLDG.DEPT.�FI DEP .�E C.� PRS•4 SP•76583-81 a Adopted 1-1-78 nTNia yr vnt wg DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Fre b Life Safety PLANS REVIEW SECTION Plan Review Number CHECK-MARKED REGULA-:Lh1S, IN ADDITION TU ANY REQUIREMENTS APPEARING ON THF 1TTAC11FD REVIEW N(Yr1CF, MUST RE INCORPOrATCD IG'1V THIS PROJECT. Approval of Submitted plane does not constitute approval of any omissions or oversights nor of noncompli-ance with any applicable regulations of local government that may exceed State requirementu. i 1. Structure required to be Type throughout due to area, height, occupancy, Fire Zone. 2. one-hour fire resistance rating required for all interior construction. 3. All living unite required to be completely separated by one-hour fire resistive construction. 4. exit corridors require separation from any ether area by one-hour fire resistive construction. sec. 3304(g) 5. Door assemblies of interior openings to corridors are required to have a fire resistance rating of not less than 2n minutes and m.iet be self-closinq or automatic-closing. Relights in corridors require wired glass set :.n fixed (steel) framing. See 1973 State Structural Specialty Code, Sections 3304(h) end 4306. E. Storage rooms, closets, laboratories, shops and areas of similar hazard require separation from other areas by at least one-hour fire resistive construction. Furnace and boiler rooms require one-hour fire resistive construction. 7. All vertical openings such as stairways, trash chutes, etc., require full enclosure of closone-hour, two-hour fire resistance. Access ways to such shafts require self- ing and latching Class B fire door assemblies one-hour rated, one and one-half hour rated. Sec. 1706 R. Attic areas require draft barriers as per Sec. 3205, not exceeding each 3,000 square feet. (9,000 square feet where sprinkler protection provided) Sec. 3205 9. Voidn created by ceiling-floor systems require draft barriers not exceeding each 1,000 square feet. Sec. �517(f) 10. Building projections such an balconies, eaves, overha-,., etc., require fire protection as per 1976 State Structural Specialty Code, Section 1710. 11. Fire stops, blocking or framing members pierced for utility runs require packing to equal fire resistance prior to such piercing. Wood frame construction requires firestoppinq of both vertical and horizontal draft openings at maximum intervals of 10 feet. Sec. 2517(f) 12. Corridors require at least 6 feet in clear width. Drinking fountains or other equipment may not operate in a manner which would obstruct the minimum 6 foot wilth. Sec. 3317 13. Handrails are required on all stairways. Stairways over 44" wide need handrails on both sides. Sec. 3305 14. Open stair railings and guardrails shall have int,•rmadiate rails or closures with no openings large enough to pans a 9" spi. -e. Sec. 1716 15. Exit doors from lobbien, corridors and rooms with potential occupancies of SO or more are required to awing in the direction of exit travel. Sec. 3303 16. Exit doors from lobbies, corridors and assembly .areas require panic hardware. 17. Hardware for all doors required for egress is required to be of simple type having no pro- visions for locking against egress, with obvious method of operation. Flush bolts other than listed automatic are not acceptable. Sec. 3303 (See exception) 18. At least 44" (inches) in clear width, without projections, in required for exits and patient room doors through which patients must be transported in wheelchairs, stretchers or beds. Sec. 3318 19. Sleeping rooms require at leant one window readily openable from inside wither:t special tools and providing a clear openidg of not less than 5.7 square feet. The minimum net clear opening height dimension shall be !4 inches. The minimum net clear opening width dimension shall be 20 lichee. Where w ndows are provided as a means of egress or rescue they shall have a finished sill height not nore than 44'' (inches) above the floor. (fiver) r 20. Surface flame spread rates of walls and ceilings, minimum requirement: stairway - 25, corridors - 75, other rooms - 200. Sec. 4203 21. Combustible acoustical material required to be secured with staples or equivalent metallic ho:ders or a heat resistant adhesive capable of withstanding 1000°F for one-half hour. Sec. 4202 22. All curtains, drapes and similar furnishings are required to be noncumbustible or rendered and maintained flameproof. Sec. 4205 23. With stanhard spacing, rows of seats between aisles may not exceed 14. Rows of seats opening onto aisles at one end only may not exceed 7 scats. Also see continental spacing, Sec. 3313 - 3314 24. Standard seat row spacing must provide a space of at least 12 ir.ches from the back of one seat to the front of the most forward projection of the seat immediately behind. Sec. 3314 25. Posting of capacity of assembly areas as noted is required by State Structural Code, Sec. 3a01(j) 26. Heating, cooking, air conditioning and similar service equipment are required to be approved and listed by a nationally recognized testing agency, su_,h as ILL., Inc., and to be in- stalled in compliance with agency's specifications and recoq.:ized mete practices. The installation of ventilation systems is required to be in substantial conformity with the 1976 Mechanical Specialty Code. Corridors are not acceptable for use as supply or return air plenums. 27. A dust collection system is required for shop areas for nonportable machines emitting or producing dasts. (Ref: Sec. 1008) Dust collection equipment to be located outside of building or in one-hour separated room equipped with automatic sprinylers. 28. A.S.M.E. approved pressure relief valves are required for all water heaters, installed either in separate water tank port or in port for hot nater line. Shutoff valves may not be located between a water tank and relief valve. 29. A firefighting water supply is requir:td within 500 feet of building that is capable of producing 500 qpm (minimum) for 10 minutes for each 5,000 square feet of floor area within building up to a maximum f 500 qpm for 30 minutes, or provide a 5,000 to 15,000 gallon reserve water supply at. required. 30. Interior wet standpipes at least 2 inches in diameter located and equipped as per Sec. 3804 are required. Couplings and connections required to be American National Standard Thread. Where standpipes are served by sprinkler piping, see 1973 NFPA Pamlhlet #13, 3-7.7. Sec, 3804 31. Approved automatic sprinkler protection throughout occupancy is required. 32. Approved automatic sprinklers are required over and under stage and in all auxiliary areas, including dressing rooms, storerooms and workshops. (Sec. 3802) 33. Stage roof ventilators displacing at least 5% of stage floor area, openable by hand from stage floor and by fusible link or other heat activated device, are required. (Sec. 39nl-06) 34. An approved fire alarm system conforming to 1972 NEPA Pamphlet 072-A with signals audible throughout building and manual alarm sending stations a,jacent to exits from each floor or area are required. 35. 22" X 30" access to attic spaces is required per Section 3105. 36. All exit doors and access ways thereto are required to be identified by approved electrically illuminated signs served by two circuits with one separate from all other circuits. Sec. 3312 37. An emergency power syLtem is required for the gysauasium, auditorium, building to maintain exit illumination for not less than one-half hour in event of public utility failure. Sec. 3311 38. Fluorescent light fixtures installed on combustible surfaces are required to be U.L., Inc., approved for such mounting, or installed to provide at least one and one-half inch air space ortween the fixture housing and combustible material. 39. Conformance with all requirements for the removal of architectural barriers to the handi- capped is required in compliance i•tth Chapter 31. NOTES: 1. Local regulations or insurance standards for most favorable insurance credit may, and often do, exceed these minimums State requirements. 2. This review does not cover O.S.E.A. (O.S.H.A.) requ.ations. 3. This review does not cover Medicare-Medicaid regulations. 4. Oregon State Health Departme,ut. o ,c c P j U � w f Z Z is V I T77 TTTllJ cYr h lk Q f / 1 ` fl LL LU _ cr a it AtN1NW4 Disclt4