The URL can be used to link to this page

SW OAK STREET i ZIEC L- ;' 03: _9 D . P. MIIIC. '036'3'6;.' I`�"'�y �oor �r r . �,- -,1 •jr•- L!E.: c� "(3-' 39'- P. ►'II�.uL I . I, �� '�ry�. ole 6 eL Be ,��ca�,t,EQ •tom ��'°P - IQc 07 101,! f Lar& 14ACao, y -strop h�a CT RU op rd, Y� Y . r 14, ! �7�►..+mow • ...+'•r �-,_-.� ,... .0, f 1 ��" ,�,�..,r► yG i / f• 0 f ,,gyp 4' +�l� � •s • , w,, &A, �rl N� rr ell cn I Cpl '` a ro��715 Vo Gtr �+ e-z#- ,000� 5��e0000r 1.00 dd CID r a � jT . OPN . PERMIT N`. . . _..... . _• - y ___T.—�-- .- _ ..._.� --- w rJNR-'yam., ► _,,.. - � for -- �.1 4 w1II'll Jill.yI', I'll Jill Irl1lI) 11I1 1 ..w. 7,1 111111 I I 116 1...1 1,�I.-I..l. r I_<I.�I._I.-t..)....�.,..atIUIlw+�I.I.-I.�.al:t++.r•I..l.,,.vt.I...I....I�i�I III�IY1�IIyYeI�• IllIill rllIrlr...wrl►--r1..l._l .r_. Tll tll ill llr Ill � Ir �� rll i r ' I I t i l 2 3 4 5 6 ? 8 9 I1 NOTE : IF THIS M ICROFII MED �" -�• �� ._-_._..�._�,. Io 12 4 DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOT ICk `•TT I S DUk TO 11 - -QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL. "DRAWING. OE 6Z 82 1Z 9Z SZ *C Ez ZZ IZ 0? 61 Of LI 91 51 b l C I 21 11 01 -6 6 1 9 S b �►!Illllllllfllllllllllll rrrlll��llllllllllli�l�llullllltlfhllllll��iNsi�a> �1i��1f�I1f11t1�NIIIIIIINII�►IIIIIIIIIII�llllllili111141lilll111111114 �AnIll;rllltIIIIli IdifIII I11j1fIIII III InI11111d "fill IIIIII III tIIIItttlltllt11111�IJ11�11ULlJ!!l1lUllltllllllWU111 i , C.��.c A8a )s X7 � r 7 rl �8 '�9 1 �] 2 4 75' 6 '77 7 �qg0 g�.J 1 8 �. � �� 70 X71 �� r �--� � �o 5 �� CrG 7 qg So 57) 515 55' E6 �. -�' 9 'J ova► @. or 1 les 5 QT . nPN . PEPMIT NO . 074--87 2 Cr t � �. �m" - __'"_.,,,,�.- 7. .-.�� . - __ _, .-.�. . ;___.-._ -_ .>�_,..,+, �. _ a.,�,_..�� :�-.4�Ya.r:�' •�;�;�., _ A_ ,�dfe}rqp+.. ...� ...'77N i'�r� ... _. .. ..o-ouc.•4 IMiiS'iMa. -..�.. .. ,. i..wr., •`.w•.+yMM�I!Nt1yX�pf;y;,: j,'.', � . •� � 1 �}I1•1 1 1111 Jill 111 1,7' 1 1I � II) II11-1l-1_1' Iti I 1..,�`.'.t.,ti.wl _l_C....lii. t.,�i. r NOTE : IF THIS MICROFILMED r'`��w- --�-•- �.. � DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOT ICE-,-'IT IS DUE TO JHIE -QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL ...� DRAWING. ..»�. OE 6Z 92 a 9Z SZ v? EZ ?Z Iz OZ 6t 91 LI 91 51 bl f. l 21 11 01 6 9 L 9 5 b E 2 1 ' .r±{Iu111111flfflllfltllttttlttit�tttlllt1411111J111111#1111 nt{attt�att�tttt�t�tIloll 14114111411t ill it I it 111110111111111 IIII'm hIIIiIII lit !'��tlil`I�Illilli�lllllil11i1111111i1111111111111111�11,1N!�1111III111111�r11IIIII1�I11111�U��111�1111�11�1�11 I MARCH 30 1992 + .waliiswlrrrwrr Vl�• ,�u. -_—.-rllrM.�•�-_._.�...sc_i,,:__�.�_ ;,,�.. _. . .. __.. ... it �.. � - -".u.. FILE NO. 1/1 - �_ 7 OAK STREET(WEST OF HALL) STR. OPN PERMIT i r December 17, 1990 CITY OF TICARD OREGON Ann P. Creswell , Asst. Proj . Director Trammel Crow Company P.O. Box 5396 Portland, OR 97228 Re: Street Opening Permit x`2.74-87 Assurance (Oak Street) Dear Ann: In the matter of the Thirty-six thousand four hundred sixteen dollars ($36, 416.00) Letter of Commitment between Trammel. Crow Company and Seattle First National Bank and the City of Tigard, Oreqon, this is to serve as a letter of authorization to allow said bank to release to Trammel Crow Company all of the deposit entrusted to said bank. All work required to be performed under the terms of the aforesaid permit having now been satisfactorily completed. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact John Hagman at Tigard City Ball., 639-4171 . sincerely, By: City Engineer '1111-Misr ,h 13125 SW Hull Blvd.,P.O.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 - - -- >v R� paK sr.0 g5 "Ave p`�--hsE �►�.`-�' cam`s Nn dt-Fr-c~cS *Jp rt'rp lt�l C��► E ahs r,-,T p-5S� ,Tiran-pm11Cro\\79iPp. Post Office Box 5396 10250 SW Greenberg Road If Portland, Oregon 97228 Portland, Oregon 97223 D October 2'l, 1990 � v V D 503/245-9400 o r,1 2 3 1990 Mr. John Hagman CITY OF TIGARD City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Oak Strect Improvement Holdback Lincoln 'Tower Dear John: Please accept this as our formal request to have a final insp°action made 4the one year maintenance guarantee on the above referenced project. Upon approval, please advise Seafirst to release the remaining funds, $3,642.00. Seafirst's address is as follows: Ms. Kathleen Thompson Seafirst Real Estate Group P.O. Box 3586 Seattle, WA 98114-2086 't'han'k you for your assistance. Do not hesitate to contact nie should you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, TRAMMELL, CROW COMPAN 1 Ann P. Creswell Assistant Project Director l IMPUIiTAIYT Masi FOR__ DATE.--,n./ M. TIME C) OF--- PHONE- ARE NUMBER N CAMFM9EEyM WILL CALL AsWN RUSH IRFROAD Y(UP CALL SPOCALAMTKNI MWTKIN — MES 'AGF 'SIGNED—_ U.S.A. LITHO IN '_ J�FORM 77-7 TLIPS FORM April. 7, 1989 J CITYOF TIOARD OREGON Trammel. Crow Company Ann P. Creswell F.O. Box 5396 Portland, OR 97228 Re: Oak Street Improvement Subdivision (Letter of Commitment Partial Release) Dear. Ann: In the matter of the thirty six thousand, four hundred sixteen dollars ($36,41.6.00) Letter. of Commitment, between Trammel Crow Company, and the City of Turd, Oregon and Seattle First National Bank (The Real Estate Group)„ this is to serve as official notice to allow said bank to release to Trammel Crow Company a portion of the deposit entrusted to said bank. The amount hereby authorized to be released is thirty-two thousand seven hundred seventy-four ($32.774.00). The amount to remain entrusted to said bank as a cash pel.formance_ bond to assure the City that all maintenance and deficiency requirements of said project are corrected, if necessary, shall be three thousand six hundred fourty-two ($3,642..00). This notice shall not be construed to nullify or alter the terms of the aforesaid Letter of Commitment in any way; it is merely an authorization to release a portion of the entrusted monies. If you have any questions regarding this matter, plea.ge contact John Hagman, at Tipard City Hall, 63''-4171. City of Tigard, Oregon Randall R. woo ley, City Enpineer br/955RD 13125 SW t lull Blvd.,P.Q.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 ---- CITYOF TIIFARD OREGON April 7, 1989 Trammel Crow Co. Ann P. Creswell, P.O. Box 5396 Portland, OR 97228 Subject: Oak 1 a Street Improvement Dear Ann: This letter is sent to inform you that the hold-back verbiage In the December 22, 1987 Letter of Commitment, between Trammel Crow Company and Seattle First National Bank (The Real Entate Group) and the City of Tigard, Oregon, regarding said street improvement is hereby ncknowled¢ed by the City to be amended to read 10% of the commitment funds (i.e. $3,642.00).. . .", In lieu of twenty percent. SincereIv, Randall R. Wooley City Engineer br/`3557:) 13125 SW Ball Blvd.,P.O.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 -{!►ese �s ire rte.• 'f � //��,-�•c.- MACKENZIE ENGINEEP, .G INCORPORATEDG3G�[�IY�CM7��MZL MACKENZIE/SAITO&ASSOCIATES, P.C. l L 0690 S W BANCROFT STREET • P BOX 69039 PORTLAND,OREGON 972010039 I (5031 224 9580 (503)224 9570 FAX 16n31 sen 1.185 3/31/89 286500 Date: Project Number _ To: City of Tigard Attention: John Bagman Project Name: S_W. Oak St. Improvements Please find attached: _shop drawings xx plans samples specificatiors copy of Iettbr change order x details calculations Number of copies: Description: (1) sepia mylar each sheet 1 ,2,3 of 3 (1) certificate of compliance. M e For your use1110 9 _ For your review For approval — As requested REMARKS: Copy to: Signed: Gary K1 ier/rck _ Mailed xx Delivered To be picked up 11 enclosures are not as noted.kindly notify us at once. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RE: S,N/, C>AK SES //�l�i'/�'✓. This is to certify to the City of Tigard, Oregon, that the following item(s) have been installed in compliance with the City's street dedication improvement standards and specifications; and that the following items are complete in accord with the approved plans, special specifications and conditions, as approved by the City, relative to the aforesaid project, to wit: (ProiPrt Enninoor'c Initials) 1. Sanitary Sewer System til/ 'l. Storm Sewer System 3. General Utility Systems : �UCt Domestic Water t Electric Power — Gas Telephone Cable T.V. ---� - Streetlighting 4. Street Fy stem: Subgrade ---- Base Surf acing. . .Base Lift Final Lift Sidewalks --— Aprons 6 Ramps _ --- Curb — -- 5. Monumentation System 2 I S� day o f {� �gn G�t� 1989 Certified this _L � _ �_ - B y (Projec e Firm: _�/� 7� ALL 1?6 (0133S) i GITYOF TI�i4RD March 29, 1989 OREGON Trammell Crow Co. ej Attn: Ann P. CreswellG�``��' � PO Box 5396 ! s 't/,,. Portland, OR 97228 Imo' r'°'�,� 4 Res Oak Street Improvement (Lin"ln Tower) Dear Ann, _ Z-_ f� --------_ Upon my receipt of kn Xs-built mylar' and an engineer's_ Certification (form enclosed) from the project engineer, Dave Larson from llaekencie gng3.neering, Inc. , I will be able to release the construction assurance. I Sincerely, John S. Hagm Engineering Technician jlh enclosure cc: Mackenzie Engineering, Inc. Attn: Dave Larson 0690 SW Bancroft St. Portland, OR 97201 I I I 13125 SW 1.1x]11 Blvd.,PO.Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 -------- -- 7-Z) a r. 7 4 _ 7 - y f/� •rc'� i"h,. /v v �.n� fS `tvt'�a��-�!� /t v ��' S - %amu :�� C�i-G(,t•✓��j -% _. �� -�' f � •�- �r� , l��'�'"// .r/ el't— *.J' 77,ct ioo�o -Y `A. ' 5 f.�--� 441(p I-e l7Z /�1t.�i�►r �.� / r -�r e M . .TrammeUCrowz;ompany Commercial Post Office Box 5396 10260 SW Greenburg Road Portland, Oregon 97228 Portland, Oregon 97223 March 15, 1989 503/245-9400 Mr. John Hagman Citi of Tigard P.G. Box 639-1730 Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Lincoln Tower 1.0260 S.W. Greenburg Road Dear Mr. Hagman: This .is our formal request to have a final inspection done for the Gak Street improvements on the above referenced project and a release of the bond that was required by the City of Tigard. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. Sincerely, TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY c MIIC.E, 3 Z�6i, `r1 1�rte_ cf�C�U- 1 F' t11C- Ann P. Creswell Assistant Project Director I Z.74-8- I • Commercial Post Office Box 5396 10260 5W Greenburg Road Portland, Oregon 97228 Portland, Oregon 97223 March 15, 1989 503/245-9400 Mr. ,john Hagman City of Tigard P.U. Box 639- 1730 Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Lincoln Tower 10260 S.W. Greenburq Road Dear Mr. Hagman: This is our formal. request to have a final inspection done for the Oak Street improvements on the above referenced project and a release of the bond that was required by the City of Tigard. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. Thank You in advance for your cooperation. Sincerely, TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY 3 z 1 Ann P. creswel.l Assistant Project Director MACKENZIE ENGINEER INCORPORATED O[F Ur k 1RMn]UVVk MACKENZIE/SAITO&ASSUCIATES, P.C. 0690 S W BANCROFT STREEI PORTLAND,OREGON 97201 (503)2249560 (503)224.9570 Data. August 19, 1988 Protect Number 286500 To: City of Tigard Attention: Mike Mills Project Name Lincoln. Center PhaSe_IV Please find attached ____ shop drawings Ax- plans samples specifications copy of letter change order details calculations Number of copies: Description: set_;HaIf street jpprovement for $.W._Q. xxx For your use For your review — For approv,.f xxx As requested REMARKS: Driveways--hay_ e b-e-u_Le_yj_wA_Aer 011r recen Copy to: Signed: Dave LarsonLck r Mailed xxx Delivered To be picked up ff enclafufni eye not AS nofed.Aondly nufdy us of onre Post•it'rautinp recluest pad 7964 ROUTING - REQUEST Pl�..ee ❑ READ To "C_ —.-- C� HANDLE `.' 176j .f'G G ell: r L] APPROVE i N and �� - �� FORWARD RETURN I10Z z KEEP OR DISCARD J'` /.. G r- LJ REVIEW WITH ME -- >; Data From � � Post It"roullnp request ped 7664 ROUTING - REQUEST Please % LI READ To ~� — CJ HANDLE ❑ APPROVE and / /J D FORWARD ❑ RETURN rCt'G� ❑ KEEP OR DISCARD � ) l t' YL ❑ REVIEW WITH ME O-0ill/240 Date `� o From b� + 17 n , C7/ y� - / 77 y Go,1. I �. /!"Y� /2el G L"L-tt C.".Ce 7e 71 c ; . ,....may.....-„�,N"•p+p .. ....�,""^ __. r.�._"---__�....-�...—..--_...�..�..........�»,-.,....w....,w.--,... REQUEST FOR ACTION II CnY 'TWIM LOCATION: 'el - -• �- i T” • PROBLEM: Date: FORWARD TO: Administrator ____ Police P.W. OPERATIONS - Building _ Finance Library __.__. Recorder I ----------- Planning __-- Other Department Head Response- ____.---__Byi __._.. . - - ACTION TAKEN:— - --- i1 r""r` 7, BY —.. -- ---- -- Date - A�- c7 Pneh!II"motlnp requent ped 7641 WHITE Neturn W reply ROUTING - REQUEST -- Please L J READ U HANDLE _ \ s� IJ APPROVE 1 ander r (� FORWARD LJ RETURN Aj1 U KEEP OR DISCARD Ll REVIEW WITH ME J( Grp watt T<� r Date �/Q ��4i-:.Ifw-:� ,Pi� � �,.�' ^ J •-`D .�'�LfG .h-.'7/L�J ..�!! Gt. i(L�L7.., f�A�V14 . prp-t-4/►� ..-�w...e../.�1�:.�' �. �i,.� �.✓'b-Q, �erL�i'j,"'�� 4 Il'�rs. .�-✓t.n.,ftC4.2. yC f y� s o ,-�-c.4 Q.lf�.,. U �.:. r�2C�L- � ��i.-� x.�ef,,.. -.�. �4K-�..2'`./4.•._�ZL,�d.�.Ln...�.t �� Jt2a�,�ti..� .� �� ,7/a.L4? .a��1MOG►�1 �a �xi�nes- w. •c��jy�i�+� -� erY.�J�.�.'et, . �✓', .r��e%r._-�/ -/l�.r /PGc.y�,.�:3.� �yH�i-�- -'�C.u-c'�L�4• 1,4.G'u �A7,�- 1'.,c../ �r•rr'u,�eY r � ��H -�,'f � 4.�..,� � �c..,�...:..-�7'�a�� i. ,X�� -�`-r,.... l r ��rt.yas'yvl , Pnfll 1\'7oullnq toquo9t pad 7884 OUTING - REQUEST \ Please ❑ READ ❑ HANDLE ❑ APPROVE and ❑ FORWARD ❑ RETURN F] KEEP KEEP OR DISCARD —.— -- ❑ REV!EW WITH ME Date_ — Frem_ (bnsrnlRion/nspelYinn R'f:cuted I'elti Carlson Testing, Inc. PO.Box 23814 Tigard,Oregon 97223 No �('-3407 Phone(503)684-3460 � . REPORT OF IN-PLACE SOIL DENSITY TESTS Febntsry 24, 1988 C hent Trammell Crow Co. Project The Tower @ Lincoln Center Sol Description Fill Sand Tested by: B. O'Connor Mex. Dry Densitye104.3 Lbs./cu. ft. Optimum Moisture► i._'_ 'e Method of Test Nuclear 3411-B I, +I o• IUt TEST L. UC A T I O N LLty. ILIrr rIt'0 IN-PLACE OE7S1Tv ` X11/ YO /I. M0. 011'.11[ iL.i./(U IT.) 1 M'lT Ca r.t r�o� Op d I 2-23 1 Re-test of Test #6 frorn 2-12-88 Sanitary Sand 13.1 113.2 100.0 95,9 2-23 2 Re-test of 'fest #4 frame 2-12-98 Fire Line 13.8 113.6 99.8 95.7 2-23 3 Re-test of Test #2 from 2-12-88 Fire Line 25.9 125.5 99.7 95.6 2-23 4 Re-test of Test #3 from 2-12-88 Fire Line 1.7.5 117.1. 99.7 95.6 2-23 5 Re-test of Test #1 from 2-12-88 Sanitary 17.4 119.2 101.5 97.3 Remarks cc: City of Tigard Washington Co. c nzie ai oAssoc. -- ------- - -- —.3augh Const. Co. -- Dames & Moore -- --- -- -- ---- _ — CARLgON TESTING INC BAUGH construction P. O. Box 767, Beaverton, Oregon 97075 • 503.641-2500 TRANSMITTAL RECORD No. ToDate A— �;Lj �. U 7 — Job � �--/�7ilIP.� LocationL X We are sending: AttachedSeparate cover by Vendor: Quantity Drawing No. Description ` - For approval --_ _ Approved as noted For your use _. Not approved- please resubmit -- -__ Per your request Remarks:----- --- — - — �AUGH PONSTRUCTI CO- Job No. Code MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED @)[F 'f [rNi kHZW 0UTZ[L MACKENZIE/SAITO&AQ CIATES, P.C. UH90'iW BANGriUFT STREET PORT .,qu.OREUIJN 9720' Date: January 12, 1988_ Project Number 286500 To: City of Ti card Attention: John Hagman Project Name: Lincoln Center-Oak Street Please f i nd attached: —shop drawings J �-s.�K9. ou'. xx plans samples (Z) specifications I �( copy of letter ��'�'^ '� P o'Ht•e4%A* ce change order 1 details ?•r w4 s cJ calculations Number of copies: Description: 1 Traffic control flans XX For your use For your review _ For approval AN As requested 1' REMARKS: The_s�ttached clan is adequate for advance constrMCbion signing on Oak_ r �teased on seeds to 30 mph. _ Copy to: ------ —� Signed: b.y,_Larson/kpc Mailed _&V Delivered __..._ To be picked up It Indo+ores ere not as notedkindly notify us 1t once. I APPLICATION - STREET IMPRO,.1-MENT/EXCAVATION COPY TO: OR DI NA .E NO. 74-14 Ll(WHITE)-FILE [ (YELLOW)•INSP. (INSTRUCTIONS ON SEPARATE SHEET) - (PINK)-OTHER AGENCY Bldg. 13(BLUE)-APPLICANT APPROVED '-� APPLICATION NO.: _31O NOT APPROVED El CI Y 01' I IGARD, OREGON FEC- AMT. S 1, 6.64 PENDING FEE PMT. ❑ CII11 NALL RECEIPT z �d8Z PENDING SECURITY (:] PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ray _ DATr /Z /Z9 / Gr7 PENDING AGENCY "OK" p application and Progress Record + MAINTF-NANCF_ BOND i. 20% min. PENDING INFORMATION ❑ FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT/EXCAVATION A': 111 U ,l REI) A NNUAI PENDING VARIANCE L� _- EXPIRATION DA'C'E 1Qr1.�_y�ar PERMIT NO 274-87 DATE ISSLIFD BY: 1 (1 ) APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO EXCAVATE FOR AND INSTALL _ HATE-GIP', _TMPRO ,S-_—__T__ AS DESCRIBED HEREIN, IN FU!_L ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. APPLICANT Trammel Crow Co. 10300 S.W. Greenhurg Rd. Portland, OR 97228 245-9400 NAMEArIbpE35 CONTRACTORFIT".qnS_. '. �gy_a g_ _],g Rd• _Sh�zwood__ P. 97140 _ 692-9D8_ 500 _ NAME ADDRESS ____ PLANS BY Mackenzie Saito & ASSOC., P.C. 0690 S.W. Bancroft St. Portland, OR _224-9570 NAME ADDRESS CITY —PHONE ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT TOTAL VALUATION ( COST): S _ 36,416.00 . -_---- ---_-___.--� - DOLLARS (2) EXCAVATION DATA: FOR OFFICE USEt C'MIN. 0.04 x s 36,4.16.00 = f_1_,456.64 ( !STREET DESCRIPTION _ PROGRESS_& INSPECTION STATUS_- NAME SURFACE CUT CUr CUT MATERIAL INSTALLED ITEM DATE REMARKS/TYPE BY TYPE LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH ITEM QUANTITY STREET -- PEaILD__INE _ (Mcil'e. const ction lam R TION C! ESTIMATED STREET OPENING DATE j E - - --- ESTIMATED STREET CLOSING DATE: T— � � _ E (3) SECURITY NO. _. SECURITY AMT.: $ _)4,416.00- STRIFET CLOSED SURETY CO.: _- -�_-- FINALP11�: CE RI�FIED CHECH CASH ❑ •OND t INSPEC, ,..-.—��r= -r- I ll PLOT PLAN INDICATE 1,ITE PERTINENT PHYSICAL SPECIAL PROVISIONS /CONDITIONS: FEATURES. EXCAVATION LOCATION AND EXTENT. 1 All work shall conform to the City approved plan therefor. I Work Area I Tri Ffic control ,fall be Pro- f ) j 1 1 vided for by a22licant in _ URS - conformance with the City app- xxxxxx _,_owed plan therefor. Oak StTeet 3) Notify City Inspector 24 hrs --.—prinr fn work -cnttneu - n (639-4171 Mr. Mike Mills) 41__91 as-Luilt molar of all wa& sial] I I be Im p to the city by 4pltcantz _ eT1 jirEEr. (5) NOTE THE CITY OF TIGARD DOES NOT, HEREBY, GRANT PERMISSION TO APPLICANTS TO CONDUCT WORK WHERE RIGHT-OF-WAY JURISDICTION IS THAT OF WASHINGTON COIINTY OR THE STATE OF OREGON. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO DEPOSIT THE REQUIRED SECURITIES, TO COMPLY WITH AL t_ PERTINENT LAWS AND CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS PERTINENT TO CONDUCT OF THE WORK, AND TO SAVE HARMLESS THE CITY AND EMPLOYEES AGAINST ANY INJURY OR DAMAGE WHICH MAY RESULT FROM APPLICANTS ACTIONS *A sqmrate $329.76 strtaetlight enerW & mtint. dMmit is reWi md. APPLICANTS SIGNATURE ---_--�_ _ �� !� DATE r Moore Surnl1 forml,Inr CITYOF TIgARD No. 13125 S.w. HALL BLVD 2 8 0 82 -` P.O. BOX 23397 TIGARD. OR 97223 � Da;Q I `l r NamA� /Addre Lot B1or,k/Ma —_- p Subdivision/Address Permit prs Plumb Cash hec Sewer Other 011'.er Rec. Acct, No. gv 10.432Descrlption Buildin Permit Fees 10.431-600 Plumbin PFees-------, Amount 10-431.601 Permit F ee g— Mechanical Permit Fees 10.230-501 State Bide 10.433 • Tax -----__-___ Plans Check Fee 30.443 _ Sewer Connection Sewer Ins 51.448 pection 52-449.610 Street Syst, Dev. ChargQ Parks I Syst. Dev, Char Parks IIS Charge ge 52-449-620 .31.450 Yst. Dev. ---___ _ Storm Drainage Syst. Dev, Charge 1U•430 Business Tax 10.434 Alarm Permit 10.227— Bail 10-455- Fines • --•------_— ___. ----- 10.230• Traftic/Misd/Parking CPTq Traffic/Misd/Vic. Asst. 10.456----_-- Indigent Defense _ _ - -- 30.122.401 Sewer erv!c e/U -- 30.122.40;. Sewer --- 30.123 Service/City 30% 20-125 Sewer Sevice/City Maln—�• -- Unmatched 31.12.1 Storm-Drainage 40-.,,75 P— — --_ — Bancroft in, Py-- m -----� _ 4 .471Bancroft Int. P ACCOUNTING Cony l • PLEASE TAKE THIS TO THE CASHIER FOR A RECEIPT NOME: � ��z�ki � 1 l�,c. DATE: ��,c_ Z9 500 -A 4, A je- 9810t ACCT. H DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 10-22000 Refundable Performance Bond Deposit $ 10-43500 Sign Permits HOP TU $- 10-43600 Public Sewer Plan Check/Inspection Fee $ 10-43'600 Public Storm Plan Check/Inspection Fee $ 10-43600 Street Dedication/Public Improvement Fee $ 10-4360 Street Opening_Permit . 7�4—� 7 $ 4-SL, 10-43601 Street and Traffic Marking $_ ` 1-�44�200�) _ Street Light Fee $ 3Zq 10-43700 Subdivision Applications: S MLP 10-43800 Zoning Applications: 7C CPA ZOA PD Misc SCE _ CU SLP_ V $ 10-44000 Other Planning Fees: SDR Non refundable portion of Appeal Fees $ 10-22000 Refundable portion of Appeal Fees $v 10-45100 Document Sales: Engrg. Planning Bldg. 10-43000 Business Tax 1OTAL 1045P/0023P ` \ \ (Y) $ 00 / 7 NC) g co - -- -- -� / � t o _ 7 e § 3 « o G \ r § , r- � - c ° (n @ \ _ § A o ra Ir * Er ( �f E C) � % co - r / i /� ) / ® f \ m w o 2 ' � 1-3 rn w / 2 k .n V) j& C � / c ( / 3w \ G $, w 'A CT co \ L � / \ CD / ) \ >» 2 I wco ° �Z� @ u w | 3 d 2 §}<2 Ul 6 9 2X . $E ( _ I \m 3 §■§i ƒ0E% 0 ° . . � � . i * c� r, M 00 N On M N N 5 m 1 M * it r 1j J D u N i0 Z Q1 ' ~ r T1 • IN n M ^ a M W S Q T if) --- -- ------`— m0 wY�u fh [r m z N [T z ZwZi f'- • Ld a f 8uu LU .7; 1 W Li l z 1� I p Lrl U 4 U "A v of w O a _ T o .a z M w w rfl to W Lrl N � O n J D ° •• m N d m a ' m .J s w U 2 Q.J ut r1'1 4 tt (a N F7 ru fT ODO In In N Z s a, J ; F to N O L� O n Q aw �� 2 OD w rim (n WQ< n WFwe a.x J r6 W f � � af-00 � iu�l U m O.O . Q 0 T Ci ~ S M _:ji F"IFST REG 'TRAMMELL PDX 22 1.5 02 UbUO-4J CCUMMITMENT . (hur'i'ormancar Dund) ,_„' institution) r,ir, c rNcoi.viced f T�;a ' y � f ln4ncVSW tmpr'c�vumWnl: OP r.'� wo , cum+nitmont in the awmuunt of 336, to t 1 igctr'd, sstid xirroh bc►ing commonly know" r oyay etc eQ' lu :Atud in L'hu C.it'y 0 ror const��flei0 liduwepclkn, oa9 6t �^H�rl' 1Fiie lurRn Cummitllltlnt; i$ spouiPically rpr { ) Hublic ecrcuts, including curbs, baso, surfaCutili�y r4locratiuns .tnu si ,'aux clusters and utlliti4s, 2) storm ruwera �) st,rceo0i ht.s All sue►; improv®mnrtts are to be uumplatrd it ,d� ,el+na�r is 4) ry!`+c , P 9 pr"mit orrGrmit, with City app 'u td co nrtructic�n Plans Arid the rtrctet: u 4nin p aq ,,on,rnt thc�rein�a►rd. de in tt'st di"LurrC^+4rtt, pP thar 9;i6, 41wrl all, +atidm(s)McCord butwith n0t; 1 +,.+ tofluwinq eclu+,l,�lu upor. c4mplvtlon of witch, O t.,, i�,�i•,g the hold•-t,acic described below. 1 rrm 5 187 .00 ProAa+^atior;/Grod ing 1,020-00 r,,oncrwlta Cueb 9,957 AU ro,_k, 10voltncl ruck, be5o A.(. 10,655.00 {ur,n 9ewcer & appu0.etncct9 3,790-00 c31dvwwlk C 0+•ive,,jsy AF„-Orfs 3,999 .00 ,�n�+lt (etrNNt uv,rr lacy) gOq,00 g r roe{ �,r 3Etl i nq hducr o,terec! i�ttiii a ,Strrspt Opening Permit Ayruwtm�nl:" whwrmorabY wa hat N 9 {reed to inst.all all improvements in acturdrtn Ce uu t tcithh 1 9f�Lhiriwk�� i,�i.a9 City o" -.gor'd and we arA h�•ruhy authort�i ghas "en ddhCrgd L'u' P(4'1thom t0 us Wily WNIan the following That the City of tigard has provided certification acknowledging cumplution or any }r all work gvr``uacnt to ",e above itAnitroAd schedule o imp Pur eui+nt to the above »cF+odu'n, 20'K or ts- thr cummitment. Punta (i u, , until l f""' od �r anti 1 f'nal will be hisld Wick thrJu9h the normal one yea+• gubrrAntoA p ' to provided wit" City Arcv� itancv of the projrtct t'aekes piaci or until the City 104 from the dA" �epllrNtr m�ir+tendncu bund, nffe�tive Pur sAld Nys F urQecupk,nuad Proudum frc, or city c;and.ltiunwl a+:captk " otheur�rdtge h tportud. d-foi-t,s , aced maintonwnea, du 'ir,g 9 TRAMMELL PDX p 2/22 16-03 _ t I ' Page 2 Lotter of CommitMdrlt Concurrent with th'0 fined �� rl(aase of the%e fut( ATT o'4tT"�mer�{ p Ceodingr will be instituted. It is undr,rstood and approved by all parties of cuneorn to this latter of Commitment; that tho City Of Tigard shall have first "Alm and priority in the the sum of $16,416.00, lass diekwrsemant.s approvod by the Gity of Tigard, ovent• of arty defect(%)/or failuru(s) to correct such in tho construction of the required improvement% . It is further unduretaod and &%rpod that the af'orsaid priority of ciKim is paramount to all parties including the landing institution making t'hp loan and I.�I'At: the lending institution has covenanted and aq,aad that the sum Of $36,414.00 lase disbursements approved by the WY of Tigard shall be hold 1w.ailable to shtisfy any eNreniontionod clekim by the City notwithstanding default on loan by burrowing party or torr'xnat•ion of loan by lending irtnt•it:ution, OATE w, Sincerely Yours, ?r•amM, Crow Curnp Aprruved and Accepted! L►�f" TO (handing Institution) (Atteicc l nut;ary inPurm+scio�, and signature(s) authority, Cf/1.Ze0�.• Atilt 04 Ittl 04 ji a �— Pe%eived iy PARSONS EXCAVACTING. INC. Developer - Engineer Agreement 1)'FG, I 7 1;it.y Engineer 13125 SW Hall Blvd PO Box 23397 Tigard, OR 9722.3 RE : _ Oak Street,, Half RtrAPf Tmirnvcampnt (Name of Project.) Dear City Engineer: We hereby certify that Mackenzie/Saito & Assoc._P.C'-.. / JIM (Name of EnyinbNr) !l has been retained by Trammel Cj-,ow CcxtjL2an _ _ --------- (Name of Developer') to perform the following work pertinent to the above project. 1 . Perform the surveying or verify the existing surreying information as necessary for the design. 2. If necessary, provide for the expertise of other engineers such as soils or structural engineers and, also, oversee materials and systems testing. 3 . Prepare construction drawings in accordance with the City standards and obtain the City, and if applicable, DEQ, County, or State approval of such drawings . 4 . Supply construction staking, , ri. Provide adequate inspection to assure compliance with City Spec.ifications, and keep accurate field notes in order to prepare "as--built" drawings . 6 Upon completion of construction provide c,ne set of as -built drawings cin mylar to the City . 7, Upon completion of construction provide written certification that, all improvements are complete in accord with the appruvred plans and speci`icati.ons . 8 . Obtain City approval prior to any substantial deviation from the approvrd plans . 9. Resolve engineering and construction related problems as may arise . We agree to notify the City immediately if the above agreement is terminated or if Vie Engineer- for any reason is unable perform the above duties . Trz-1rgme,. -row Co. : h1r3c kr i« S I�soc. P.C. : A. Developers Engineer Date Date sb/3512P �� r 12/ 15 -- e��,r-w�r.�4 '"^�"1�� e ,.,.� �� + u�G.- �. '��E . CI1 Y OF TIGARD, OREGON Dt.VEI.OPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FEE COMPUTATION S11(A.T Project Title: �r 2.+iv�e_1 ..►c<< Com , (�;�, j ImprY Type: /�`.... er __.. Computed L1y: �_ Date: 12 -15-C,y7 1 . PROJECT PERMIT FEE (T.M.C. 18. 164 , 150) : A. Improvement cost estimate, less sanitary sewer. . . .s 1 r (Adjusted Cost) 8. 0.04 x 41 I., . _ _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Adjusted Cost) 2 . SANITARY SEWER MAIN, PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION FEE (Ord. No. 05-02) : A. Contract surcharge applicable . . . . . yes, no. (agreement name) B. Sewer Improvement cost estimate (sewer est. ) C. 0.04 x $ - = $ _. �_._...___ (s_Pwer estimate) (fee) [or] $100.00 min. , whichever is greater . . . . . . . . .$_ � A 3 . STREETLIGHT FEE (T.M.C. 18 . 164 . 130 (x) & 3 .08.010) : A. P.C.E. Schedule No. —, Option No. Type of l.amr, N F.' . *twat ts (monthly rate) (no. of lights) (monthly rate) (no. of poles) IG:• $ ' _ + --- _ x 24 months $ 3zC, .. __. (subtotal lights) (Subtotal poles) II 4 . TRAFFIC- PEDESTRIAN SIGN FEE (T.M.C. 18 . 164.030(u) : A. Stop: — $ - — --- = $- (number) (each) (subtotal) (1. Combo. @ $ 1). No. P.ar-k i nq: E. — - — @ $ --_ $--- (Misc. ) F. @ $ Sign(s) Total. , . . . . .$� 5. GRAND TOTAL (FEE'S DUE). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , Ror:oipt No. : Date Paid: Check cash 0920P C25 TINA RD GON of Service Decemher 4 , 1987 -1986 Mackenzi.e/Sato b Assoc, P.C. 0690 S .W. Bancroft St . Portland, Or. 97201 RF : Oak Street Improvement Dear Mr. . Larson I Attached please find _nne_ copy(s) of a public improvement plan. needs to be circulated Lhrough the below noted agencies fur revir10 acknowledgement and, subsequently, returned to this offico. Very truly your , John S. Hagman Engineering Technician 3397P/00481> /_X/ PGE Company Nor,thwest NAI.Ural Gas Co 14655 SW Old Schools ferry Rd. 220 N.W. Second Avenue Beaverton, OR 97005 Portland, OR 97209 SEE: Jim Johnston, 643 -5454 SEE: Ron polvi , 226--4211 /x/ General Telephone Co. /_.. / Tigard Water District 12460 SW Main Street 9841 SW Commercial Street Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 SEE: Donna Donaldson, 620--0313 SEF:: Bob Santee, 639-1554 Ed Wilmott - /X7 Met.zger WaLer DisU it-I /XY Washing Lon CounLy f*ir+i 0i3l 01 5501 SW Taylors Ferry 16i,+d 20665 SW nlanton Portland, OR 97219 Aloha+, OR 97001 SEE- Jesse I.cwman, 245-3331 SEE : (Ione Dirchell , h49 1110 13125 SW Nall Blvd.,PO,Box 23397,Tigard,Oregon 97223 (503)639..4171 — a IwaI-aLiri 1 irr Pr-otucl.ion 1)1strricI /x/ W 11'+1114,111, (.,Ab14, 2O66'-- SW Ithmt.on 14200 :.W fir lyadiloll Colli I Aloha, OR 97007 Haavor•tun, OR 9/1101) S1:E Gont, H i eche l l, 649-•8577 NEC K , J ::t rviat , 644 111111 liyu+rd post Office / _/ State Highway Division 715 NW Huy L 2.131 SW Scho 1 l s Ftwry Road P.U. Box 3047 Beaverton, OR 97005 Portland, OR 97200--97608 SEE: 1.ee Gunderson, 77.9...1% 107 S1:E : Mike Kr-ygier•, 294•-2300 U.S A Corps of Engineers /X/ Wash. Co Land Usr SLatr! of Oregon Courthuusra Division of StaLelands 150 N first. Avvnl.ia 1600 '.,Lata Street Hillsboro, OR 9/124 Salem, OR 97310 SEE: Ran Aasc, 648 110:10 SEE: Bill parks 378-3805 U.S.A. Corps of Engineers Portland District Permit Evaluation Section 319 SW Pine Port)And, OR 972.04 SEE: Richard Johnson 221--6995 3347P/OO401) l Mackenzie Engineerinr4'ncorporated Project:L/X/<OZA) <CV7 R Pti. _:� ��dA,151 Cost Estimate Job #: 2 6 60 0 23-3 Date By: 5. CGL_ STREETS Unit Price Quantity Total Clearing and Grubbing _L E _ X Al _ vac? Grading, Including Stripping X _ 4"As halt Concrete «' X 5 a 1 �. P � - .— b.35', ��Q Y'US =Rock Base �}°- X49. • 9 5!✓yo5' 3�5� Concrete Curb: Vertical _ X _ Curb & Gutter ILF X 4o 4,r-, Z z 07u Sidewalks ��:_. X zona 4y r-r- - Soft Areas (2"-0" Rock Base) !_C-,/_ X 5D c-I/ = Som /�EMOvE DW 2EL0<A rF W47Fe,1-/ErE/,'6 al WAI-LI D►ST• X 1914. �— QgivVr JXPEF X / k-4. _ L 6rA;, POW1 it P.0455 x 2 FA _ <, ell,,Al C, BQ✓F.,PIf ,� �_c X xX720 . - - kE�lo 50, YDs, 7/9,05 :41,Y,05 1,4-3i�) F/L 6 i t l l*-ta 1/9.40 a4 Y05. 3 y STORM DRAINAGE Pipe Granular/Native Backfill X —_ Pipe Granular/Native Backfill _ X = _ Pipe Granular/Native Backfill x = Pipe Granular/Native Backfill _ X. Pipe Granular/Native Backfill _ x = Pipe Granular/Native Backfill X Pipe Granular/Native Backfill x Pipe Granular/Native Backfill X Standard Manholes X Inlet Manholes x Inlets 6Ar(<+9/.'/) -a x _ l Cleanouts x Ri prap X = _� Outfall Structure X = —_ Ditch Construction x Pavement Restoration x x = C-F— X ;?9 A, =. I LE FF,_ `J�a 1 N�Fc Tota 1 a P 34-1414 . Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated Project: (dAPsr.) Cost Estimate Job : 2 05062 //-7.7-.37 Date By STREETS Unit Price Quantity Total Clearing and Grubbing LS X A /I _ _ = yoy Grading, Including Stripping ?. - X - 4"Asphalt Concrete _ �« X ��R, �-.-, - Rock Base 411L X �g95. 9 .5 4) _ 5� Concrete Curb: Vertical `-- X = - Curb & Gutter —r-T-:- c F X _IE-_ = z o LD ��'f_ , Sidewalks �F r�X 2020 4 r-T- _ �_,� 7z Soft Areas (2"-0" Rock Base) /C�_ X U-1-2✓ayf Olt I�ELOr AIF w,4i,-leE-1 W'AltiZ DOT. X c7`L 4YA;f f'Ocd[i,,v POLES r.1 r C.r X 7- R,4. A.<, �l C✓E,P(f, !rF X /.33 0 �IEAlO;✓E Al•C, - (n/9. 5Q, YDS. I i 2 3 S �F>LL I( 7/9,os ,.u.YOS /1¢3Y5 T=at41/9. 40 4 Y1 3� STORM DRAINAGE �— Pipe Granular/Native Backfill _ _ X _ Pipe Granular/Native Backfill X - - Pipe Granular/Native Backfill _ X Pipe Granular/Native Backfill Pipe Granular/Native BackfillX - ----� _ Pipe Granular/Native Backfill _ W X - --` _ -- Pipe Granular/Native Backfill _ _ X - Pipe Granular/Native Backfill _ �� X a �- Standard Manholes _ X Inlet Manholes - X _ — Inlets X - - Cleanouts -_ - X = R i p r a p - ---- X --- - _- ._ Outfall Structure -- X -- Ditch Construction X Pavement RestorationX !ft -� --- _ -- _ <, SIN r -s _f� �_�---- _ e� X X T - 2�7"� LF _X 29 L � _ -77' -5 o. . v ) 251'- F 2� �L X L'wPfi 01 '� ., _ F `'O G LP��' 3& 416,°e MACKENZIE ENGINES (G INCORPORATED 'TF— (IF MACKENZIEISAITO&ASSOCIATES, P.C. IE W , 1,41:,W HANCRO" STREEI PORTLAND.ORE GON97201 ?4 9!fi(1 (Y).10 7?4%7n Date: August 24, 1987 Project Number 286500 To: City Of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Tigard Attention: John Hagulan Project Name: Lincoln IV - Oak Street Improvement Plan Please find attached: X� shop drawings plans _samples specifications — copy of letter change order _details calculations Number of copies: Description: 7 sets Bluelines Sheet 1 & 2 _ For your use XX.. For your review XX For approval As requested REMARKS: f I w �)z.v e L z4-%cm Copy to: Signed: Dave Larson _ -i.,,. V-w yaw Wc+kcg . _ Mailed I XX_ Delivered To be picked up 11 sncMsurss or*not 4111 noted,kindly notify us sl oome, MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: July 1., 1987 T0: Keith Liden, Senior Planner 'J FROM: Randy Clarno, Development Services Manage wl! RE: SDR 87-08 (Lincoln Center Four) We have reviewed the materials that Mackenzie Engineering submitted to demonstrate compliance with conditions 1(a) and 1(b) of the staff report. All information appears to be complete and acceptable. However, Mackenzie Engineering should assure the Engineering Section that the proposed middle, relocated ac(:ess on S.W. Lincoln Street is in direct alignment with S.W. Mapleleaf Street to the east. I see no reason why the resolution of this item should hold up the applicants site/foundation permit, however, it must be resolved prior to building permits. cc: Brad Roast / John Hagman William Monahan MACKENZIE/�AITO & ASSOCIATES, P.C., OREGON MACKENZIE/SAITO&ASSOCIATES, P.S.,WASHINGTON AHCHITECTS•PLANNEH;, 0690 SW BANCROF T STREET PORTLAND, OREGON 97PO 1 (60:11 ??4 1r5 70 June Z3, 1987 1("' r�► VT4 City of Tigard Attention: Keith Liden, Senior Planner I IIUH KIa 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. \INNING DEP1. P. 0. Box 23397 Tigard, Oreqon 97223 /71 RE : Lincoln Center IV ( rll (City File #SDR 97-08/V87-01) Il , M/SA Project Number 286500 G1 I Y 1_)I 116iHD Dear Keith: PLANNING DEPT. This will address conditions 1(a) and 1(b) of the above referenced project approval , with respect to the information to be provided prior to the acquisition of a site work permit. Condition 1(a) requires a demonstration of the capacity of the on-site and off-site storm drainage system. The attached analysis prepared by David Larson, P.E. , doeulnents that this has been accomplished. Condition 1(b) requires a revised site plan reflecting the future relocation of thr existing and proposed driveways on S.W. Locust and S.W. Oak Streets. You will note that the enclosed site plan indicates the location of the future access points, And the closure of the direct accesses to S.W. Locust and S.W. Oak when these are installed . In addition, the plan for the southeast corner of the site has been clarified to reflect the "jog" in the site' s easterly property line, and to identify the interim improvement for the driveway with widening and landscaping to be added at the time or the Lincoln Street extension. This ultimate design is consistent with our preliminary 1rawings submitted with the Site Design Review package. Please call me if you have any questions regarding this information. Sincerely, (460 Lans Stout. I S/smk Enclosure cc : Eric T. Saito Dave Welsh Jim Eddy Dan Boyden F_ MACKENZIE/SAITO & HSSOCIATES, P.C. A�N _,1r """-. "t"1 ',11 It I ! P1)IAIJ ANU UNE u(IN N'..,w 150.11 224 957u MEMORANDUM DATE: June 22, 1987 SUBJECT: Lincoln Center IV - Drainage Project. Number 286500 BY; David L arsonYo-.�-- TO: File The following drainage analysis summarizes previous design studies, addresses the City of Tigard' s Design Review requirements. ' The site drains generally towards the south, eventually reaching Ash Creek and crossing under Highway 217. Ash Creek' s headwaters are approximately 3.5 miles above Highway 217, with an approximate concentration time of 2-3 hours. lhis compares with a concentration time of about 30 minutes for Lincoln Center and the upstream porti :ns of its contributing area. As with many other sites discharging into lower drainage systems in Tigard, stormwater detention at this location would not be appropriate. The effect of detention wniild be to hold water back, adding to the peak flow of Ash Creek and greatly impacting the drainage structure at Highway 217. (Some small detention areas were constructed in phases I and II under the then applicable County detention requirements) . On-site drainaqe piping is sized to accommodate the 10 year, storm, as is typically required by Plumbing Code. Since the site size is larger than provided for by the established Plumbing Code pipe sizing tables, the rational formula was utilized. Although all pipes are sized to accommodate a 10 year storm, storms in excess of the 10 year levels will flow safely across parking areas and street gutters, through and downstream of the project. The 1811 storm drain, from 95th and Oak downstream, is sized to accept the contributing area' s 10 year design storm. in order to verify LincolnCenter local , earlier peaking, the runoff was checked and found to be at approximately 2/3 of capacity. In conclusion, the existing and proposed drainage system, on-site and downstream, is adequately sized to carry the 10 year design storm. Calculations are attached. DGL/smk r•.c : Jim Eddy Dan Boyden Rick Saito Lans Stout M F.raO g2, � I 1 �r-r l o � �6- I ' f -TV-rAAL- IASI u ZD 7 41E ls-L� 23,77 >Ac Q.E5 171rrA'I- ASR D(4-tit-W6 7v CEOPROFFer^ @ UL�nha-rF- FAC-ttx,- c z. o. ♦O N Di". 11 He cr- c N 6tTf f g^TI N 7 '3Q 1 1 I hl v-ft S #10505 z1o@ N Q� c7,q ar 1� .9 cF5 � LP1b, S- 014.4 (71 3,0°�� h = D,DIZ J�- f1S l N L•.1 /oh11-f F vC.-�1 JiJ �� PW- f A. N�l�) ly' LI►.>T r?�� Ni -rN S IOE �r Opti `�1'(Z Tot-1 po,\sr_-S -1 I I Ac-ke CC O,1Cc) , Tc - 12 MINUTES a= GIA C.Qj �2,2� -7. I I - 12.51 CFS r_z co,yA ury /.5" PVC-06* (11=0.006) = 13 LFS or- , Z 5% SLzrs F. 415W IS It L.I AJC- 140N& F/'l S T 51r-)C- OF n2opoj e-) f7AjZK/Aj _, •31 Ar l2 t S C 0,5 / 7c .: l 1 MIN. TI, - 2.2 14 /j is q = o.8(2.4)c.201 - /2,I/ GFS /5"C Ise, M /3 cFs oK--- A-t.aNG tJZ +N >°oqfZK_0j6 S'TtwCT Lr� (0 31 ri r G p.�, T� _ le MIDI , .Z,o= 2.5 C� = 0. ZcFs IS'�38%, L 16 cFs c,1::L BALANCE OF PiPINc gTizow) Is 1G pr.-Vo PFA u =4= S/7, 67) Prre- * '�tr?I(*S Cr' PAI,15G7 1T 1M ARE BP Itil V 11024t1TE'C, I N TD PlgASE- JZ_ +A!,'7 N T41s -- 041 'I:�'TM 3o34- PVc. IS A-LL cW6-0 By ASN, 00 PUBLIC L Vl S Frn,. STv2H Df2A NAGc-; L. iNLOL.n1 -�--- �7►.IAC CLCVLA-T(09S — - By DATE MACKEN2IE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED JOB NO 0690 S W BANCROFT STREET PORTLAND,OREGON 97201(503)224.9,80 SHT —OF 3 1 j �o s�,y BENCH MARK -- - - (? ` 6<L N ELEVATIOI,; DATUM pA5ED ON O.D O•T BRA55 CAP - -J NO. W(oll ON HWY 217 - 5 W, 6REENBURG Rid �� LOCCJST Rb STA. 7+11 STA. 2_+00 OVER6R0551N6 . ELEV = 200.03 A C OVERLAY LIMITS -- BACK' AHEAD - �rj Q GRIND AC TO ALLOW MIN 1 ';14' A DEPTH TYPICAL -• SAND 5EAL JOINT i oq THE SITE v CLA`35 °C '' A C OVERLAY MAX DEPTEI' z o�c -RELOCATE PP 6 .�. OAK ST. ��ALE . I' = 2OI c� ti - SEE PROFILE BELOW MIN DEPTH - I /, Q � GLIY WIRES �- MATCH EhI�T 'G IMPROvEtitF_NT� -I- v - V) h_iy F_ .►} !/ STA 2+ 33 N (i ---- - - IO' R/W DEOICATIOPI INSTALL C B . REMOVE OR Z U w4y- PER pETAIL 1 REO' D THIS PROJECT _ -_ �� ,�� t2ELOCATE W.M ( F✓� z V } GR EL_ = 119. 1(o REMIOVE OR uj -a f1 w T/C = 179 B7 � Z_ F- � RELOCATE w til � �-- RELOCATE PP W Ca Q � 6cF�OvE Dr1 W VICINITY NEAP � �►- � s � ArnuST w �� r X � CON5TRUCT 297 LF 15" P Y•C @5 = c�.015 z w ? I jz�, � } r �, i ..........._._. +. zW !V WO 11 0 Lx I��T �i�.. a- _._- - _. ,, ----_-_____ ,wry�:rrlllrr>•rrrrwrc rr�r.e.� IY O, SAW CUT EXIST A C N `/' z N `✓ - z uj L J�;57 4 c : �._. _ J L f _ ti_ y _��..� Q o _. i W ��► .V 1 / m 3 O I ^ v � r l < �1X15T. MH ST. STA. 2+ 17,5 ± ! V < �' a `� TAP PROPOSED IS" PV G O � .. < E I � INTO EXIST. MANHC7L FEATHER OVERLAY TO 5' PROM 'SOUTH R/W, 1 ' �l SAND � 5EAL EDGAE - 600ROINATE W11 H 1 ----- 3 0 I— - --_- — ------ - --- 20 - -� I,, J HOMEOWNER 5 I _ NJ ! �I 5NO11 DE 5' i8' VARIABLE 13 ocI - -_-_--_ --- — ,� I i j ;' CONSTRUCTION N61- ES I �.-- o ( 10' NOMINAL >� Q + DRIVEWAYS ) N� 1 •� w I. CONTRACTOR TO ARRANGE FOR UTILITY 60MPANY > rnj AY T� B� �� . �'� LINDI:RCAROUND LOCATION5 PRIOR TO START' OF ~ I� .SAW CUT 7 ,=DiAT�Zf� 4 ALL NEW PIPING SHALL BE A5.TM D- 3034 PVC II^^ k'' CONSTRUCTION. POTHOLE EXIgTING DTII ITIES A,,-) `n :Z O CURB GUTTER C� /�L/10EM�/'- � 94L!SE Z-Ir-76, ( �JUNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. a ,,rrte� REQ'U TO IDENTIFY CONFLICTS WITH NEW Lu Z Q Z '� PER STD.GS-300 J� v/ CONSTRUCT'ON. COJROINATE ABANDONMENT OF RA15E ALL RIM5, VALVE COVERS, ETC IN OVERLAY AREA ♦^ TALK COAT ON EX15T• ' TO FINISH GRADE . +,r/ � „ �% (WASHINGTON CO. ) i� ' UTILITY STRUCTURES NOT" REQ' O TO REMAIN' o- 0 W A.C. � OVERLAY SLS�� 2a� I / / I i- 3/4" MINUS FOR THIS PROMCT. ALL WORK SHALL_ CONFORM TO WASHINGTON C.O. DEPT. OF W kx 1 : 1 MA),. �. 2.5 /o I/Z" MIN /I' SHOULDER ROCK I di, ,, �_.- y� LAND U5E AND TRANSPORTATION - DETAILS )E516NATED 0 2% MI1�1. _ _• '�--t ' I A5 REQ' 0 r 2 (_'ONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXISTING CJNDITIONS ARE FROM "UNIFORM ROAD IMPROVEMENT DE,IufN S-fANDARDS', _ Q � d a s' -b �-4" C!_ASS "C" A.G j PRIOR f0 ['.ONSirZUCTION. PER ORDINANCE NO. 318, ADOPTED JULY 22198Co , AND op';.^. ." : D G _ 3C6 CURRENT APWA SPECIFICATIOWS. > W _ 3 /"-O" LEVELING COURSE 3 CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY OWNERS E3u51NE55ES 1 PLAN AFI=ECTED Pk10R 1O COMMENCEMENT OF' CONS-TRU- �• I Ut \ lc Pc F i�RU�'[�" TIERCE c OBRA <`IOCJ w� ST2� �1-L-lGttl-� ; W >" EXIST' GROUND---� l 12 I/2 -O" BAST: COURSE �„�_� �- G (� �. CTION� WITH INFORMATION ON ULTOUR 5CHEDULING� < I; oN (�xl��Tl►� Poi Es P�`�r Qc4E. c'c , ® Q (APPROX.) 4 , �[REM�UtK, �TG. � PRI=F'RRE T F`I � d L i7 N5 `1�} C)A�t'S' � (r � � � � �¢T7'L14 i�E,L> g l Oil T G 5TAe1RT O bV0 R U BNif ea I N I: R � ►�c-tea U{1'fiWF'R191/AL ( <t° yr C c? �'" TYPICAL STREET SECTION -`� �"------ Z r i- _•�..t,�,�nr:............................................... N. T. S. -J - W *- S . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . a 0.s( E k. I J T I' OF1 L.E /ate t7 0 = co 190 ' : : : : : Li .............:.......................................;............................................................................;.... ....................................... ............ . .. .. ........ `� � w � 9 I v � Cr . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . - X15r, CL XJFILE Ld �" H aRADF > O �1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . : . . . F ROF'OSEC It FINIS f � Z = y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOF OF CURB LEFT - CD K) + r _ t -� t - 6 0 i 8 . . . . . _ - _ - _ - ................... ................................. of c°o E-- q � rnw ..�=+.0.5 �rT G -- 0.5Y. O o ^' \ ON _ 1.- I82 Eo • H 182 Phi? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178 - -- 178 N ...............................................:.....•......................,..........:......................................:........................ ..........:.................. ...............:......................:-....,,,•. .., _. _... _. .... _.. ... ... .._...__.. .j.-...-.. ....... ,,,�,�i ......�_ .... .. : } � : : : : : : : : : s : : : . . : • . : : : : : . : � •�l � DATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . : I I c. s - o.olg _ — - _�_ _ 74 r V-� . F Y 8 MAY O I� 7 5 alva ........ 2 .............................I............................................................................:................................... ....................... G(yNSTRU DRAWN I :... . . . . . . . i ; CONSTRUCT 29 LF C W N S11: : : : : : . : : : 15" F'vC �! =0.210 Z74rj 1 . . . . . . . . . ----- � : : : : : : : : : I : : : : : : : : ' � I CHECKED BY: IONV I D G L 1 . . . . . . . . . I 1 70 --- 7a 03 . . ..... r1 >, - _ _ _ ... 1 F...••• CDP REVIEW /� IAN _ .. :.�. �. ..�. dda REVISIONS.' e . . . � . . . . : : --„ ...” _ . I ..._..._ ._.......- x_........._ � 1,RE�15.PER -W ANI IX ST W R I . i s I--. V V i . 1. �o 6 3 F- PPP,OVF[ ONSTRUCTION .............. I b i A i b ..... _ I ...................... ................................ ................................ ..... ........................ ...... . ......... .... ... .. � � � -� 0 9r z I S ca - ? � �,, + (� � Q� ICM'O it' Fi.1 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : i i - - l' �.•.,.-'.+.... 4 M) OQ1 ENGR OFFICE (�Y ;DATE/ T� . . . I Mac'.KENZIEENGINEERING INCA IA�RATEf7 } ,�1 ,YF11 4L.; RIGF1tS RESERVE[1 . . . . . . . . aor k h: tb tV r. f` OPENAT.OFFICE BY ..�.. DATE ...�� . . . . . . i i i LL 4 "'` '-- -�/,' J ,�' TMtlt DAAtIN41 Allt THE i : Q U u ©LDG OFFICE by BATE V �✓ 7 �?? �Q �AOr[ATY Of MACIttNLlt t _ r ...... N oR�o�Artt� v I E- >►�I w w /c� ...... s fid ............................. ......... / ?',t�'-'��.. .*.rA67��1! ...... ......I � 1.�............... _....._. ........... F 1'^ ��F: ,�': _a + : AND �: i NOT 7 o e c •W� 162 i ..... ..1...• opw-.0 , eY _ .'"_`�_ . 1 ''.Y .' `. y:. t0 IN ANY ANitl1.1!R •* ... W O wJ — VV,NAT GAS B � f,p stow OF ME'.� r r!f r t I 3 w P G F CO BY I,gTE L�7 Painted : : I . . . . . . : : : ' SHEET :. ; w Z � �� PROFILE . . .: a �;. Z ! W N Wll1AM.CABIf.Ce) By nn 1C it 0 „ `n 3 X - : : : : : : . 158 4 4r WAT DI p /� N 1 58 .... 4 M � 1' 1 t51 Ai c► w _-- , ; 5 C A L E -- cL.�r'h, N I f1AfE I�MIr1�W�� iN�11�G ` : : /�4j1�J� .. /I� -- E DIS P � r EXC- I EYC- 1 i . . . I I HCJf21Z . ' 1:r 9 ZO` FIRE &rr*r N� n��i;I i . . � .y 1 I . . . . . . . . . j T _ I . . . . . . . . : : : : : - �l E RT. i" 4 �. �' . . . . . . . . . . . . . S 1 —1 ST I r. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ` . . . I I ^ . UNI ,F,W AGENCY ttY UniE i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T -1 T 5•-1 ? . . . . . ' r . . . . . . . i 1 . . . . . . . . _.... ....................................�.......... .�. _.........._..... i Of i 3 B _... .. 1.... .... . .... _� . ... EE .. »...»..» l.»..».....__......� ...... .. .. ... _...... ......................................................................................r...................._................ .................. _......................................... ...................... ...... I JOB Not 2 8&500 i a, �,.. _,, .,.........—.,...�,...__. ..............._._...._.._...........�.-�•...a�.a�r��r.._�;.,.w.-.— Y-; �r _ - •q,,..a...•- ,».i,..�..- _..- ^b.:iY.*`_.:.' ... r,.r'rzrrr.�'.e';.s•`.. "".•'"'.-.. • � :, � _ � 1 � - � I 1 � � �• , ,_ .�._ _ .._ '"'�1�'''_ _.._., _ I 1� it �'I1 lil I 1 1�1 111 lil 1 I IIII III IIIjI 1 Jill III 111 I��Illl llli111111111111�111iI�_ I� IIIiIL.ll111,1'+I111illi�llllE't�llli111IIIIi111IIIlIII11111i1111�I11i1111'11IIIIIIIII111'111i1t1 1 NOTE: I F _1 H IS MICROFILMED ( 2 3 4 _ 5 - 6 7 8 9 10 _ 1 _-- 12 -I DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICA 'IT IS DUF TO JHE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL — DRAWING. OE 62 92 LZ 92 SZ 102 EZ 22 10 OZ 61 all LI 91 S1 t, c1 ZI II 01 6 9 C 9 S� b £L-.- Z I"•"' / ��!IIIINin1111111�uulnnlnulullilu{�IIIIi111t11111i11gIlu11u1�1ut1111n1utIi111111i11i11111lIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111111itINlNlliIIIIIIIIIII'+itlNlllllilllllNI11111l�11111111111111111111t111�111:111l1J11111IIIIIiIII111111i111111111�IWINU)lillllllllilllllllllUII�IIUIIIIIIIWIIiH MARCH 30 1992 J r ~ Q kp S. W. OAK ST. -- - STA. S + 30 5TA 5 +92 .a ` .._-..-..............._.......... _ = 20 itJSTALI_ G I3 ---� WIDE DWY Y 7- 152, (10N5TRUCT 297 LF PER DETAIL. I �f R DETAIL Q `-' A MATGN EXIST'G `✓ W 15°F?V.0 �►` 5 = 0.015- GR EL = 104 50 3 �S v < GIROUND z W T,/C = 1 Q5 AZO I p � O 0 Z REMOVE OR / ti OREMOVE Oa - CC W AQJU5T WM )RELOCATE vv.M N N 4 2 Z '2 --FUTURE 5MEWALK Uj 6p 1 f 6 D W v CURB it GUTTER In W 4111110 4111111111 MINES mq� t'kt�l I�Iq L LLJ! I, I — _ 1 ve sw— j. G— G 1 •ssnvrr. i _ -o w - - _ ----` is - . --0+ `i'' r ` 4, , o M N s� A�•'�i j I.f) �bk o. �' bk a �' b ^°` k ,y�► I NO Z 1.% b 4y +►' c55____f SS 7 __. _ . __ .— bdi� _.... __ _ rU4 .�� O _ Cr c�a LL +� y SAW UT EX 1ST. �►.G w _ - o �- ^ • l rt Lij rv- ��cc oUj a 1�i4A a 74 00.� ti, P4iJ0 `3' �, a ,gip Y LA_ ZQ O % coo A$Pi4A,I ' vrN L.-Op U rV —- - K/ ---^k -— •� IN 1 r PLUG \ba g* 1 1 -- w - _.�, ` t , z cc C 0 FEATHER OVERLAY TO 5' FROM 50UTH R/W, END OVE_RLA_Y_ TAPER STA G+ GO SAND 4 SEAL EDGE - ,COORDINATE WITH I GRIND A G TO ALLOW MIN I Y411 A.G. 1 = HOMEOWNERS { DEPYF•I TYPICAL - SAND SEAL JOINT C MATCH 9X157'6 A C REFERENCE NOTES � of I . EXISTING SANITARY SEWER INFORMATION PER PLAN 13Y : Q 1 5TEVEN5 f THOMPSON, INC , DATED : 1/15/G5 }- to 11 z 2. EXISTING C%A5 LINE - PER NORTHWEST NATURAL 6tAS CO. L1.! z N 0 3. EXISTING WATERLINE - PEr CITY OF METZ6,ER WATER DEPT �►", o z 0 W x � 0OD 0 C4 W �. C1. U � > W PLAN �C o M � 0 ¢ a z ................................................................................................................................................... ZOO � eu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . € 1 ! z J - W (r) l,L( � W fl : : : : t Z 100 _v.G_ X94 : : : : : : : : € : : : : : : . : : : . : : : ' : ' ' EXIST GkND. PROFILE @ -- — - -- - _-- --- e -0.5(0 - — - ------ 00 (/) 0 ...................................1...................,...........:..., PROPOISIEP f w LL i. AI'PRpX. Q' •� 2 Y v oc V H c7 Q i € . . : : : : . . . . . : . . : . : : m � o U 3 PROP05ED � FINkSH GRADE v o � = y 3 1 C30 . . : N 5 TOP OF CURB FT v� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ;.... LO ►U ►- > O � � �I c11 �,j �-- O + : : : { : : U �X:15T q,. PROFILE — \D 1.0 { + } 186Is : : : _ — ---- . . . . . . . . . : . X J I } J I ' ...............................................................................I. } { I . . . . . I ;�R I VAT a }c E laTORM DRAIN `�� w TO°LINCOLN CENTER PH.=" " `� 7 178 . . . . : CURB OF PROP05 € :.......................................L....................,.................€............................. . . . ...............................i... ... .. .. VF DATE l �' . . . .. . . . I . . . . . . . . ' 297 LF 15"P.V.C. I : MAY 2C>, 1987 J I DRAWN BY: . . . . . . . . f . . . 5 - 0.015 -- --__ —. L74. € :...:...:...:...:...'." : € ' _ WNL : : : ' : : : : CHECKED BY: .......................................€... ........................ z z �.:. ................. ........................... — . l O ' . . . € . . . . . . . I II Q N ~ „ i . . . . . I . : : : : : : . . . : : : : : : ' : € 7� € . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . w ul W w I I € . . . . . . � . . . . . . . . ........................... ............... Vt,_ ---• +.� -' "' "'-`—. i r-v-,-r __...... ... K.,.... ..... .. ...... _ ................. .. ... . ... __ . . . �— i.�.�..... ....,..... ..�...—..�._. .....,�-,—. ��,--�� . ....... ... � ... ....... .... ........ I . . . . . . . . . € . . . . . . . . . � . . : : . . : . : : : . . . . . . . 9X15 ... 8 �•S,P M ( . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EERING � . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . {E . . . . . . . . . € . . . . . . . . . . I .�• j� ! € € � € ! (,� 19P7 ALL it11GIN SINFSERVF.D COFRNi/iTEO I�6 I . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . : : : : : : : : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : : : : : : : : : : : : : : , : : : : : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : : : : : . . . I . . . . . . . ------- »...... ................................. ..............»......... .. € i I ! . . . . . . . T M[!R O'1AVIN[! AA[ TN■ ...... ...... v.. ...................................... M. ................................. i r t t v / K NI t N !... €... !... 110 O MAC [ I . . . . . . . . . I . .'*•. . . . . . €' ..I, _... ...._ ....... .. . .............. ................................. ..... .......... s�I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : : : ...j.... - ...�.. IN[[KI'RE INCOIIrOAAT[111160119/19 € E.. ! . ! AMC) ARE NOT TO 0[ [ ! I .6N. + IBMW.., UC[C, IN ANT MANN[11.it1w T . . IT f li € ! ! N TN[ •111TTEN 1► . I t [ I . . . . . . . : i . . . € LION JR M[1. I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . € ! 1 # i : : : : : : : : : t . . . . . . . . . € : : . . . . . . . € : : : : ; : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . : . : : : : : : . . . . . . : . : : : : : : : : : � : . : : : : : : : . . : . : . . : . . . . . . . . . . : . i : . : : : : : : : 1 . . . . . . . a LC _. s . . . . . . . . . j gNiEET i ; E ! »............... »........................ ...» . ! I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . .. I.. j................................... ............ ..............................., ................................. €.. y . . . . ! .....................f................................... ............ :............... ! EXC-2 EXE Z € . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I , . . . . . . . . : : : . : : : : : . ! . . . . . I . . I . . . . . . . . i ! . . . . . . . . . . . . € . . . . , , . . . . . ST-z ST -Z : : : . : : : : : : : : : : : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . I . . . j . . . . . . . . . ; . . . . . . . . . � : : : : : : : : : : . : : . : : : : : : : : : : : € . . . . . : { ' : : : : : : : I : : : I : : : : : . . ; . . . . . . . { . . . , . . . . . . : : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I I . . . . . . . . . i I . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . + R�-Z TP z . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . .»..E »....... ... .. ..»»... ......�.............................�...............:...: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . { . . . . . . : : : . . . . . . : : : : : : : : : : I : : : : . . . , . : ' : . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . » »-. .. ... ........................ »..............l.... I . .. »....................»........». ...».�........� ...............»...»................................................ .......................................1.......................................I.......................................I.......................................�.......... . ................................................. _ . ....... ........................................................................................................i........ I I ....... .... .............»...........................................•...1.........................................................................».......................».......................»........».. ..�.............�..............—.-- »..._.._...L...................... � "r r 9 JOA NO: 2 8 r� 5U0 � II` 111 III 111 ill tll IIl�l11 X111 IIS I�II111 1(11111 Ill�i(iI1 (I iI111�1(II1 -111111 ,II)II111I11111)lll(I(I(tI111I1111111I11111111111I111111�11111111I111111111111111(IIIIIIII111(tll t mm NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED �-- ---I 2 3 4 5 6 7 _ 8 9 — 110 - I I 12 , w DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN I w THIS NOTICi;"IT IS DUE TO ^' _JHE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DRAWING. - - ------- �' OE 62 9? 12 9Z S2 1027 E2 ZZ ILP OZ 61 RI LI 41 51 1~I EI 21 11 01 6 9 L 9 S� �r b IE-.- 2 islet ,More 1�tIIuIIIllulunllull�Iulnnlnul111�mllutll1n1111uI�u�I�t�+llu�r'I��alh�uhlulnlllunlllllllullultlntlllnlhlltllttllHnllnlllN�f'1!IuilIIt11II111IIIIlIIIPIIIIIIJI111IIIIlIII11IIIlIJ1Ulh1l1�1111IIulIu11I111111111II111IlllllllWtlllllltlJllll[W1I1111IIIIIIIIIIIIU.IIIIH MARCH 30 �. 1 � 9 � TABLE IX RAINFALL INTENSITIES FOR EAST WASHINGTON COUNTY (for Ranges 1 & 2 West) Rainfall Intensity (inches/hr) TIME OF STORM EVENT - YR/(PROBABILITY) CONCENTRATION (MIN) 2 5 10 25 50 100 (50%) (20%) (1W (4%) (2%) (1%) 0 1.90 2.50 3.00 3.4C 4.00 4.50 5 1.90 2.50 3.00 3.40 4.00 4.50 10 1.30 1.70 2.20 2.50 3.00 3.50 15 1.10 1.40 1.80 2.10 2.50 2.90 20 0.90 1.20 1.50 1.80 2.10 2.40 30 0.75 0.95 1:,20 1.40 1.65 1.90 40 0.60 0.75 1.00 1. 15 1.30 1.60 50 0.55 0.70 0.85 1.00 1.15 1.35 70 0.45 0.55 0_;0 0.82 0.95 1. 10 100 0.40 0.45 0.55 0.67 0.75 0.90 180 or 0.35 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.85 more i FIGURE III TIME OF CONCENTRATION NOTE USE NOMOGRAPH T, FOR NATURAL BASINS, WITH WE-L DEFINED CHANNELS. WH(FT.) 500 A��" C P-EK Tc_ aoo �Qjj5T7> � Tc (MIN.) 300200 200 0 ll,.l �QO Q - Iso --100 100 @ 0 L( FT.) so 50 �vu7',tU f-" ARCL 40t_A,S Q 5,000 Qrw3:� -- �mplac 3,000- O 20 -tz-a s krrA-" 'tz, Mf.,N - LL 20 ---2,000 -Arfjj c4Lk�--r O `- _ L) �� re wE - 15 wRE1TfL�CZ�C,,,A i,590 �Z- _ IO 0 10 —. I,00c. V - Z u- e 0 W O — s 2 5 -1 500 s LL a W O — a 3 D 300 2 � 3 Z 2 2 200 Q 150 2 �- 100 - - I 1 KIRPICH PZ.,"TIME 0:= CONCENTRATION OF SMALL AGRICULTURAL WATERSHEDS", CIVIL ENGINEERING, 29, 60, 1959. - 45 - 2t9c=,5�a 3�� NXASHINGTOi't OREGON June 15, 1987 Mr. Randy Wooley, P.E. City Engineer City of Tigard P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Rc: OAK STREET - TRANSFER OF JURISDICTION The City of Tigard has recently requested that a transfer of jurisdiction take place for Oak Street from Washington County to the City of Tigard. It will take Board action for the actual transfer to occur, but it is apparent that the transfer of jurisdiction is eminent. Therefore, for all future roadway improvements on Oak Street within the City limits (i .e. Lincoln Center' s phase 4 proposed half street) the City of Tigard should take the lead in the plan review process. As a courtesy, the County should receive a set of approved plans up until such time as the jurisdiction transfer occurs. :should you have any questions or comments, please contact me. ,j *icnael A. Borresen, P.E. Engineering/Surveying Manager C: Engineering Review File Scott King/Paula Calvin Jerry Green OO15H MAE:TT:hs ::e;an-er; cf Land 'use And Transooriauon Encineenng!Survey Dwsion Njc— c est ,avenue H?11S1,0r7.Oregon 97124 Phone 503/648.8761 CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 87-09 VARIANCE V 87-07 TRAMMELL CROW CO. APPL_ICATIO_N: Request by Trammell Crow Company for a Site Development Review to allow the construction of a 13 story building ofapproximately 200,000 square feet as the fourth phase of the Lincoln Center office comulox and a Variance to allow a building 176 feet in height where 45 feet is the maximum allowable, and a decrease in the width of compact parking spaces from 8 . 5 fret to 8 feet on property zoned with Washington County districts O,--C (Office Commercial), R-5 (Residential, 5 units per acre) and R-9 (Residential, 9 units per acre) . Location: east of SW Greenburg Road, south of SW Locust Streot , west and south of SW Lincoln Street and north of SW Oak Street (WCTM 11,3,1 35AH lots 800, 801, 900, 901 , 1004, 1005, part of 3300, 3301 , 3400, 3402, 3404, 3500, 3600. ) DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVE=D the above application subject to certain conditions . The findings and conclusions on which the Director based his decision are ris noted below. A. FINDING OF FACT I . Background The subject property was annexed to the City of Tigard in le.tc April , 1987. Prior to the allnexatiori, two land use applications (Comprehensive Plan Amendment., Special Use Permit) were filed with Washington County . Also, it was agreed between the Citv and County that all applications in process at the County would contir,�oe even if the final decision occurred after annexation. The Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change (Case No. 87-73-11) to change the use designation from R-5 (Residential , 5 unity/acro) and Institutional to 0-C (Office Commercial) on parcels loc"ted immediately north of Oak Street and west of tha Lincoln Strout extension. This was approved by the Board of, Commissioners ori May 19, 1987 A Special Use Permit for a parking lot (Casa No. 81 1)1 ;;U) w,vv granted by the County on May 13, 1987 for- four- residentially zoned parcels located at the southwest corner of Locust Stroi)l and 93rd Avenue, The residences on these properties will be ramovod and a parkinq area will be developed in conjunction with the project proposed in this application. The conditions of approval imposed by the County shall remain in effect. On May 18, 1987, the Tigard City Council approved the rezoninq of lh, annexed area in Metzger from Washington County designation,.q to tii � designations which most closely resemhIe the County zones. lh►s NOTICF OF DECISION - SDR 97-08/V 87-07 - IRAMMELL CROW CO. - PAGE 1 i ordinance (No. 87--22) will become effective on June 18, 1987. The following review utilizes the City Community Development Codd rather than County regulations . 2 . Vicinity Information Residential properties lie to the east of 93rd Avenue and to the northeast. The Metzger School property is zoned Institutional in the County :.and will be zoned R--4,5 (Residential , 4 .5 units/acrd) in the City Properties to the north, west, and south are zoned Office Commercial and will be C-P (Commercial Professional) it the City Primary access for tho project is directed ,o Greenburg Road to the west and Locust :street, Oak Street and 43rd Avenue border the remainder of the property . 3 . Site Informi•ation and Proposal Description The property is presently developed with three office buildings with .i gross floor area of approximately 300,000 square feet, parking arca; , and landscaping. The applicant has recently purchased the three parcels that were subject of the Zone Change (87--73--M) as well as tho four parcels involved in the Special Use Permit (87-122-SU) . These properties will be incorporated as part of this project. The applicant proposes to construct a fourth office building that will have a maximum of 13 floors, a height of 176 feet, and a gross floor area of approximately 2.00,000 square feet. Within this area about 8,000 square feet of service retail space will be provided on the first floor, The building will be located between the two existing office buildings known as Lincoln Center I and II with a setback of approximately 220 feet from the eastern property line. Additional parking area will be provided on the site and a second parking_ structure will be built immediately south of the nqw building. Access is proposed to be directed primarily to Greenburg Road with secondary access to Locust and Oak Streets . The entrance to Gr-eanbu"l Road and the traffic signal will be modified to accommodate the additional traffic. The Metzger-Progress Community Plan identifies Greenburg Road as a minor arterial street and Locust, 93rd, and Oak as local streets . Variances are requested to exceed the maximum allowable height in the C-P zone of 45 feet and to allow compact parking spaces that ort, 8 feet. in width rather than the required 8 .5 feet. 4. Agency and NPO t:omments The Engineering Division has the following comments: a. SW Greenburg Road, SW locust Street, and SW Oak Stroet aro currently under Washington County jurisdiction. SW Lincoln Street is under the jurisdiction of the City of Tigard. The City &rad Counly are currently workinq to transfer the jarisdictian of I NOTICE OF DECI5TON - SUR 87- 08/V 87--07 -- TRAMMELL CROW CO. - PAGE 2 -ti v r iD O SW Locust and SW Oak to the City. Because of this transfer, the County desires to have the City issue all improvement permits for SW Oak and SW Locust by "blanket" County permit. b. SW Oak Street and SW Lincoln are currently classified as local streets; however, the Metzger/Progress Circulation Study recommends that all of SW Lincoln and SW Oak from SW Lincoln to SW Greenburq be upgraded to minor collectors . 1 h Metzger/Progress Study also recommends a direct connection between SW Locust Street and SW Oak Street via SW Lincoln Street. This connection is also recommended to have a minor collector classification. Staff gorerally supports the above recommendations relative to the Metzger/Progress Circulation Study . Existing improvements on portions of SW Oak and SW Locust Streets are substandard while all of SW Lincoln .is sub,ctandard. C . Both SW Locust Street and SW Oak Street west of Lincoln Street should be improved to minor- collector standards at this time which will require half--s t.rep t improvements on portions of both However, SW Lincoln should riot be improved until the entire connection can be completed . The applicant should sign a waiver of remonstrance for future improvement of SW Lincoln Street . d. The applicant proposes two new access points to the site, one on SW Locust near SW Lincoln and one on SW Oak Street near the recommended SW Lincoln Street connection. These proposed access points appear to be acceptable under current conditions. However, once the SW Lincoln Street connection is completed, these access poirts should be moved to SW Lincoln Street. Learing these access points in the proposed locations after the SW Lincoln Street connection is completed' will have a negative impact on traffic flow and safety at these intersections . Both the City and County recommend the relocation of these_ access points . e The applicant ' s traffic analysis indicates that significant improvements are needed at the site' s access on SW Greenburq Road (signalized) and on the site' s internal drive. Because Greenburg Road and the signal at this location are under county jurisdiction, County staff has performed a significant amount of review of the applicant' s proposal . In addition, the Oregon Department of Transportation has reviewed the proposal for impacts to the Highway 217 and SW Greenburq Road interchange. The County is recommending significant improvements to this intersection. f. The County staff have indicated that the County will continuA t0 favor the public arterial (Greenburq Road) over the privet(, approach (Mapleleaf) in setting the traffic signal timing 1 h County will continue to prioritize the signal green time to c1eAr Greenburq traffic . Therefore, level of service on MapleleAf will not be quite as good as predicted by the applicant' s traffit analysis . This is a possible concern for the applicant but i< expected to result in negligible negative impacts or. the publI, streets . If delays on M<apleleaf reach a level unsatisfactory t,) the property owners at a future time, they may wish to consider NOTICE CF DECISION -- SDR 87--08/v 87--07 — TRAWM9ELL CROW 00. — PAGE 3 construction of additional turn lanes (e,g. , a northbound `O right-turn ',ane on Greenburg) to further increase intersection capacity, g. The applicant proposes to utilize the existing storm drainage system developed for previous phases . However, certain engineering analytical checks should be made , h. The proposal will utilize an existing 8 inch public sanitary sewer \ that traverse? the site from east to west arid connects to the Ash Creek interceptor. p r . The Metzger Water District suggests that water- service be cor lnl.( t, d t u the 12 inch line located in Oak Street. Also, street. tmpruvomont•; east of 95th Avenue on Oak Street should ue coordinated with tilt, District to enable the extension of this line to Ilall noulevard The US Post Office notes that: a mail room needs to be provided c,n tF,o first floor. lhp Building Inspection Division has no objection to the proposal No other, comments have been received. D. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSICN The proposed development is consistent with basic Community Development Code requirements for the proposed use, landscaping, access, parking, Land visual clearance. the issues raised by the Engineering Division rare addressed under the conditions of approval rncted in Section C below Further discussi.cn is warrantpyt relating site, parking, and landscaping plan details and the variance request for, exceeding the maximum buildinq height and reducing parking space width. landscaping The applicant has presented a conceptual landscaping plan which ind,(- 4 that slightly Ove- the 15 percent area requirement is provided land that it will be possible to meet Code standards . Prior- to issuing bucldiny permits, a detailed plan must be, developed that addresses maintenAnco of existing mature trees where practical, sc-eening and visual bufforinq for nearby residences - particularly those located immediattrly to iho northeast and southeast - and the installation of a sufficient number (it treps (one trop per seven spaces) in and adjacent to the parking aro,As Park i rig Although it, is clear that the project will exceed the City stutNndd fur nunber of parking spaces additional information should be submit tod to indicate the total floor square footage and number „f parking sF,,ttt tor the entire Lincoln Center devel„pmer,t NOTICE OF DECISION - SDR 87-08/V 87-07 - TRAMMELL CROW CO. pM3E 4 0 7a The Code requires that secure bicycle parking spaces be provided at a ratio of one space for every 15 required vehicular- spaces. Based upon this formula, 38 bicycle spaces are needed in conjunction with this building. No bicycle parking facilities were observed anywhere un the site and therefore it will be most beneficial to distribute these spaces throughout the project. Spaces should be. supplied within both parking structures as well as in the vicinity of building entrances. Variance Section 18 . 134.050 of the Code contains the following criteria which apply to the building height and parking space width variances requested as part of this application. I . The proposed variance will riot be materially detrimental to the purposes of this Code; be in conflict with the policies of they Comprehensive Plan; to any other applicable policies and standards; and to other properties in the same Zoning district or vicinity . 2 . lhere are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the applicant. has no control and which are riot applicable to other Properties in the same zoning district. 3 . The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this Code and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible, while permitting some economic use of the land. 4. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would' occur if the development were located as specified in the Code. 5 The hardship is not self--imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. Height Inc applicant satisfactorily addressed the above criteria and the staff would like to offer- some additional comments . The standard height allowance in the C--P zone is 45 feet. Section 18.98 .020 of the Community Development. Code allows a maximum height of 75 feet in a commercial zone when the total building floor area does not: exceed 1 1, times the area of the site, the setback equals at least one half of building height, and the structure does not abut a residential zoning district. The proposed building obvious surpasses tho 75 foot standard, but it is consistent. with the other criteria because the total floor area of Lincoln Center will be less than the size of the property, the building does not abut a residential none, and the proposed setback of approximately 220 feet: excPPds the 17t, Tacit bui Idirig height . NOTICE OF DECISION -- SDR 87-�)8/V 87-07 - TRAMMELL CROW CO. - PAGE 5 The primary intent of the Code height and setback requirements is !i provide adequate light and space between buildings, particularly when different: zoning districts are involved . Though the building is taller t�,an allowed. the proposed setback will result in a less imposing buiiding tha.. a 45 foot tall structure with a 20 foot setback which would meat Code standards . No adverse impacts resulting from 1ho variance are anticipated rel.+ting to traffic impact. The building square footage is within Cede requirements and the traffic generation will not exceed what would be expected from full development of this site. As noted in the Engineering Division comments, several traffi: related issues will need to be finalized prior to completion of this project. Parking Space Dimensions The above criteria have also been adequately addressed by the applicant. The reduction in compact: space width from 8.5 to 8 feet is minimal . The Washington County standard is 7.5 feet and the present parking lot is developed with this standard. C. DECISION Based upon the discussion above the Planning Director approves SDR 81 0fl/V 87-07 subject to the following conditions : 1 . PRIOR TO ISSUANCE Of SITE WORK OR FOUNDATION PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: a. The applicant shall -demonstrate that the existing on--site and 'off—site storm drainage system is sized to carry the storm run-off /,,from a 10—year storm following full development and that lho til additional run—off caused by their development will cause no significant impacts on downstream properties. b. The applicant must submit a revised site plan demonstrating that future relocation of the SW Locust Street and SW Oak Street accesses to SW Lincoln does not: signiricantly impact the site. The ruvisod \ lir r site plan must be approved by the Planning and Engineerinq Sections 2 , PRIOR TO ISSUANCE. OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PERMITS, 1►11 f011OwINt: CONDTTIONS MAST BE COMPLETED OR ASSURED. ALL CONSTRUCTION IMPROVIMf N1t. NOTED BELOW MUST BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY 1ERM11'.: a. The applicant. shall demonstrate that the on--site pr iv,ity •:t t drainage system will be operated and maintained by an orif or rr.4t\10 maintenance agreement affecting benefiting properties. b. Standard half-street improvements incIudirig sidewalks, curb+ , streetlights, driveway aprons, storm drainage and utilities %hNll bo 1p, installed along the SW Oak Street frontage. Said improvomunl+ along SW Oak Street shall be built t City minor rolloctor NOTICE OF DECISION — SDR 87-08/V 87-07 — TRAMMELL CROW CO. — PAGE 6 C", PSP 17G19r / . s Fs9 N,, s �6 s fr standards and conform to the alignment of existing adjacont N *0�� 4,7 improvements . The City will be issuing the necessary public �Y improvement permits for teas requirement. �fN r' C. Standard half-street improvements including sidewalks, curbs, C-, streetlights, driveway aprons, storm drainage, and utilities shall ap�9 If 1, 1, be installed along the SW Locust Street frontage. SLA id ,6P A ,0 improvements shall be constructed to City major collector P b}� standards and conform to the alignment of existing adjacent improvements . The City will be issuing the necessary permits for these improvements . d. Additional right-of---way shall be dedicated to the public alono the SW Oak Street frontage to increase the right-of-way to 30 foot _lila from centerline. the description for, said dedication shall be 1 tied to the o-xisting right-of-way centerline as established by I Washington County . The dedication document shall be on City forms and approved by the Engineering Section. Contact Jon Feigion in Engineering for, forms and further information. e. Additional right-of--way shall be dedicated to the public along the entire SW Lincoln Street frontage to increase the right-of -way to 30 feet from centerline. The description for said dedication shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. In ^JE�1 addition, the applicant shall dedicate to the public a 60 foot. J u wide strip, in direct alignment and extension,��1 P g of, SW Lincoln Il Street across the entire north-south distance of tax lot 3300 ma I p ✓ ISI 35AB. The dedication shall be on City forms and approved by the Engineering Section. Contact Jon Feigion to obtain forms and further information. f. The applicant shall provide at least three westbound approach I I�I�hr1�� lanes on Mapleleaf at Greenburg Road. The applicant shall construct modifications to the existing intersection and traffic It signal installation as required to accommodate the widened `• Mapleleaf approach at Greenburg Road. Said improvements will require the submittal of detailed construction drawings to the City and County for approval . g. The applicant shall sign a waiver of remonstrance agroomo nt to participate in a potential future local improvement district for the improvement of SW Lincoln Street. Included in the agr•aement will be the applicants assurance to relocate the SW Locust Street and SW Oak Street accesses to SW Lincoln Street. Said agropimunt will be prepared by the City and recorded with Washington County IU once executed . C h. , Construction of proposed public improvements shall riot commence until after the Engineering Section has issued approved public improvement. plans . The applicant must post a 100 por•cenl performance assurance, the payment of a permit, and ,a Itgti installation/streetlight fee. Also, the execution of ,+ !street opening permit or construction compliance agreement shall ocii•ur prior to, or concurrently with the issuance of approved public improvement plans . NOTICE Of DECISION - SOP 87-0e/V 87-07 - TRAMMELL CROW CO. - PAGE 7 L i , Upon completion of cursory review, seven (7) sets of plan -profile public improvement construction plans and one (1) itemirod construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registered Professional Al-P Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Section for approval . Submit improvement drawings and related data to John fla(lman in Eng ineoring. 3 . PRIOR TO ISSUANCE Of BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:: ;:IIAII BE SATISFIED: .� a. The applicant shall provide confirmation of the total gross floor arca of the entire Lincoln Center complex . b. A revised site plan shall be submitted for Plannirng hirer-tor. approval which contains the following: (1) Parking spacF dimensions (standard 9' x 18' ; compact 8" x Ib") (2) One handicapped space per 50 required spaces (12' x 18' ) (3) 38 secure bicycle spaces distributed throughout the Iim oln Center complex (bike rack design must also be submitted for approval) . C . A detailed landscaping plan shall be submitted for• Plannirnt Director approval which contains the following: (1) Identification of all plant materials . (2) Screening of parking ,areas . (3) Justification for removal of existing trees along the eatrtern boundary of the project. (4) Compliance with Chapter- 18 . 100 and Section 18. 120. 180(a)(4) et the Community Development Code. 4. Landscaping materials shown on the approved plan (Condition 1 .c ) shall be installed prior to occupancy . 5. The conditions of ;approval for Special Use Permit (87 172 SU) ani Comprehensive Plan Amendment: an(. Zone Change (87-73 -M) shall 6, satisfied . 6 This approval is valid if exercised within one year t tt r , •�I decision date noted below. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 87--08/tl 87--07 1RAMMELt CROW C8. - PACE s s sa o �w' U' 'P o PROCEDURE �a a ✓��a✓ '� 1 . Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant 6 owners XX Owners of record within the required dist.anci XX The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization l�XX Affected governmental agenciO3 2 . Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON _ June 22_, 1`187, UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. _ _ 3 . Appeal : Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18. 32. 290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the CITY RECORDER within 10 days after, notice is gisien and sent . The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 P.M. June 22, 1987. 4. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department., Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , PO Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 972.23 , 639-4171 . g-wPRAg-"- PREPARED EPARED BY: Keith S. Liden, Senior Planner DATE William A. Monahan, Director of Community Development DATE A PROVED (KL :cn/3277P/ Lis_ r 27126 I/ �.,,, 34 ---- --- - 5 - - I r.r• NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 87-08/V 87-07 - TRAMMELL CROW CO. - PAGE 9 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED OWL) ',VV HANCHUF 1 ;;I HL-L I H)HI LAND,UHEGUN 97201 (503)224-9560 May 28, 1987 City of Tigard Community Development Department Attention: Mr. Randy Clarno 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. P. 0. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: Lincoln Center Phase IV - Traffic Study Project Number 285500 Dear Mr. Clarno: Thank ,you for your review of the Lincoln Center IV Traffic Study and the several discussions you have had with Lans Stout and me regarding technical issues. I understand that your comments and questions also reflect those of Daryl Steffan of Washington County and Ron F„iimezger of the Oregon State Department of Transportation. Following is the additional information you requested. III. TRIP GENERATION The original study utilized ITE Land Use Code 710, General Office Building. A subsequent comparison of existing traffic exiting the site during the PM peak hour and Lincoln Center' s occupied footage, yielded a higher trip rate than Code 710. This comparison did not include,,% however, the square footage of the original Lincoln Center building or the site's restaurants. I believe the utilization of Code 710 will closely reflect the actual trip generation characteristics, especially since the ITE Trip Generation Manual indicates "Office buildings have been grouped into three size categories for estimating trips because small office buildings tend to have a higher generation rate than large office buildings." Regardless of this concept, our office reviewed the effect of trip rates based on ITE Code 713, General Office over 2000 KSF, assuming 3. 1 employees per 1000 GSF. An approximate 29% trip generation increase is realized with this method. (See revised Section III, Trip Generation) . IV. TRIP DISTRIBUTION The trip distribution assilmptions remain unchanged for this project. City of Tigard Project Number: 286500 May 28, 1987 Page Number 2 V. INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS The adjusted trip generation values were distributed to the major intersections studied. The average delays experienced by vehicles approaching the affected intersection increased by approxim�tply one second. In two instances, at the Greenburg/Mapleleaf and Greenberg/ilWY r17 south, the level of service crossed over from a low "C" to a high "D" (SR 209 cal-ulation method) . Revised calculations are attached for intersection capacity and lane storage. Also, you will find attached a schematic layout of the proposed Mapleleaf at Greenburg approach. In summary, the revised trip generation has little effect on the impacted intersections, with a level "D" being maintained at full occupancy of Lincoln IV. This should be considered a worst case scenario, since the project's increase in size should result in a lowered trip generation rate, and since 100% occupancy may not be realized on a constant basis. I believe you and Lens Stout have reviewed other conditions relating to the project' s approval . Specifically, Trammell Crow Company will provide non-remonstrance waivers for the future formation of LIDs for S.W. Lincoln Street and S.W. Oak Street. Also, we have agreed to a plan which would allow the proposed driveways onto S.W. Locust Street and S.W. Oak Street, both near S.W. Lincoln Street, under, a provision whereby they will be relocated onto S.W. Lincoln Street when it is constructed. However, we strongly believe that the entire length of S.W. Lincoln Street should be constructed by the L.ID, rather than requiring the half street frontage improvement at this time. Not only is this more equitable for Trammell Crow, but it wi l l result in a better project in the long run from a design and construction standpoint. Please do not hesitate to call with any questions you may have. Sincerely, David G. Larson, P.E . Project Manager DGL/smk cc : Daryl Steffan Ron Failmezger i TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PHASE IV LINCOLN CENTER FOR TF.AMMELL CROW COMPANY i i I I Date of Completion April 16, 1987 Revised May 27, 1987 Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated 0690 S. I. Bancroft Street Portland, Oregon 97201 Project Number 286500 III . TRIP GENERATION The following estimated trip generation is based upon the ITE (Institute of Transportation Engineers) Trip Generation Manual - Third Edition (1984) . A. Site Development - Lincoln IV 1. 188,000 square foot gross leasable space a. 180,000 office space b. 8,000 tenant service related retail B. Vacant Office Space - Lincoln I-III 1. 90,000 square foot gross leasable space (March 30, 1987) C. ITE Land Use Code #710 (General Office Building) 1. Total Daily TriE. Rate 12.30/1,000 GLSF* 2. Total Caily Trips 12.3 x 278 KSF - 3,419 VPH 3. P.M. Peak Trips: ITE Code #713 ?78 x 3.1 employees/n,)F = 862 employees Enter 862 @ 0.112/employees = 97 VPH Exit 862 @ 0.57/employees = 489 VPH (Based upon peak hour of adjacent street) *A.D.T. determined based upon ITE Lend Use Code #71.0 (General Office Building) . The Average Size of Independent Variable/Study is 233 KSF, which is closer to 218 KSF than that indicated in Land Use Code #713 (1300 employees x 1 KSF/3.1 employees = 419 KSF). r� t rn HALL. E(-VD. n h N W) - `✓TT�� yDL z > Q9 .. < z o ci Q W wOL �Z z 15-n4 Wl M < W 5 � M J Q. Q N � -•I M 4 N e_-� �♦ 41 �_ M Q o --+ IR %A _� tn 184 /- rgo W ul Q Z G - _ --- --_ RE V. -5- 2 7- 87 G.K. - TRIP__AsSI.C3 MF_�JT__A�T j�,IPS) _ ATEAPBL-101$Z MACKENZIE ENGINEERING IN"'ORPORATED JOB NO _V%050 - 0690 S w BANCROET STREET PORTLAND,OREGON 97201 (503)224-9560 SHT. OF _ 9N� 9 3 ° J14 HALL BLVD. 4-7 W U- 44( + r + 4- z t1i J � p o O S ZWrY z a 1Jv Z Z 2595TH LU w LL LL J Q J LA . Q � � v 4'11 L Alo -Zn5 lit IIS (�BEENbuRLa 502 •-476 -•--- 4�5 - _ 52-11) -} r (CA 3-_-. (� w,._j � N in Z � z z 0 &REV_ S-?_7- e7 G.K. F I Ci URS. -1 - -- _SPO --- _ L-'Nwl - +- V.l EO EXIST`N_ -VD-LeS mE5-_ DATE-A1__L11jr_-1--1 01- MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED JOB NO ze4gipQ I ll_n 0690 S W BANCROFT STREET PORTLAND,OREGON 97201(503(224-9560 SHT. OF V. INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS The existing intersections associated with the project were reviewed for level of service on the basis of Special Report 209, Operations and Design Method. A level of service "D" or better is considered acceptable by Oregon Department of Transportation. (See Section VII for discussion of Level "E" movements. ) The computer calculations for this work appear in the Appendix of this report. LT-MINOR RT-MINOR LT-MAJOR `;IGNAL WARRANT A. Revised Existing Conditions Greenburg2/Locustl E3 C A N N Greenburg2/Map]eleafl ----- -----C---------- N/A Greenburg2/Oak A* A -------A N N Greenburg2/Hwy 217 Northl -------- - ------- N/A Greenburg2/Hwy 217 Southl '----"`-'�--- HalJ,2/Oakl D D A N N OakL/95th1 A A A N N B. REVISED EXISTING Conditions & Lincoln IV Greenburg2/Locustl E3 C A N N Greenburg2/Map�eleafl ----------D---------- N/A Greenburg2/Oak A* A B N N Greenburg2/Hwy 217 Northl ----------D---------- N/A Greenburg2/Hwy 217 Southl ----------D-- ------ N/A Nal 2/Oakl D D A N N Oak /95th1 A A A N N I L Considered minor street for purposes of this analysis 2. Considered major street for purposes of this analysis 3. See Gap Analysis Section * Illegal Movement l VIII . VEHICLE STACKING ANALYSIS Observation of the Highway 217 overpa-': during P.M. peak hours reveals that progression between the north and south signals operates very efficiently, such that stacking is min'Omized at the bridge. Additionally, the P.M. peak trips destined for the project from south of Highway 237 number only 21. For the above reasons, the following lane stacking areas have bE,�,n addressed: 1. Southbound on Greenburg, at the approach to the Highway 217 north signal : Outside through lane: 232' Inside through lane: 188' 2. Southbound on Greenbury, at the approach to the Mapleleaf signil : Outside through lane: 266' Inside through lane: 97' 3. Westbound on Mapleleaf, at the approach to the Mapleleaf/Greenburg signal : Outside lane: 192' Inside lane: 187' For the Mapleleaf stacking, the analysis assumed dual lanes will be provided, al+hough at this time, only 150' is provided, followed by a landscape "turnaround" that :Lacks only I lane. The actual stacking at full buildout will be roughly 300 feet, accounting for the existing 5:00 p.m. peak traffic. The dual egress lanes should be provided in a straight alignment to allow for efficient vehicle progression to the signal at Greenburg. Refer to the stacking calculations in the Appendix. IX. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Lincoln Center Phase IV project will n ot adjacent street system. The project continues to emave phasinif�zenthemGreenbuon r the at Mapleleaf traffic signal as the main point of egress, which has been shown to .,. operate at level "D" at full buildout. Stacking lengths are generally adequate, except for the Mapleleaf approach t Greenburg. This approach requires 2 relatively straight egress lanes of 250 to 300 feet of length. The traffic signal at Greenburg and Map IFleaf should continue to operate as a four phase, to avoid the confusion that has persisted prior to the 1986 renovation. Since the trips generated by Lincoln IV will be predominantly directed to the Greenburg at Mapleleaf signal , the proposed Lincoln Street extension is not required for this project. The continued direction of traffic to Greenburg is consistent with the Metzger-Progress Circulation Studv, helping to meet the goal of reduced traffic accessing points east via Locust and Oak . Because of the heavy left turning volumes from Mapleleaf onto Greenburg, and the heavy right turns from Washington Square, it is suggested that removal of the south leg crosswalk be considered. This will provide for a safer pedestrian condition, and will enhance the intersection capacity. The project' Oak Street frontage should be improved, with right of waydedicatjon, to provide an adequate facility for the project 's traffic. Future improvements are planned by the Ash Creek Development and possible L . I .D. project. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I INPUT WORKSHEET 1 11rtersection--GREENEURG AT MAFLELEAF DatelMAY 1967 1 !Aria 1ysi •DFO MEI TimePeriod Anlyzd--PM PEAK HOURArea Type-. CBO XOther; iFroject No.266500 RECALC CityiState;TIGARD, OR (REV.EXIST.+LINCOLN IV) I 1 aa:.:.-.......s.........................................................s....1 IVOLUME AND GEOM£TRICS iGREENSURG NiS ST. 1 ; i [ 6951 ; 1 44 i ! 56 TOTAL ! 1 i 1 1::.0 i ! 22 <- [ 7643 1 v ) i 12.0 i 12.0 i -W6 TOTALI {N ) 26 643 24; RTH TH LT 1 696 v I ----------------- < i 3 -----------------i NORTH v NO Cv--LTH-12.0'-1 I i v---LT-12.0'-1 I ; { i-12.0'-LTH--' ) 1 ' IDENTIFY IN DIAGRAM 2-12.0'-RT---v { II .Voiumes ------------------ < < i -----------------i 12.Lenes, lane widths i LT LTH RTH ; MAPLELEAF i 13.Movements by lane 34 1 12.0 1 12.01 EiW STREET i 14.Farking locations - ; i 12.0 i 1 490 i JG.6ey etorge ingths [ 5343 9 1 1 1 502 <11> 91 i l6. 151arid-, Ei6 TOTAL - I [ 1063) 1 17.Bu5 stops v 431 Nib TOTAL i !TRAFFIC ANO ROADWAY CONOITICNS 1 {-r- ====_.....=----====¢a======a====- --=aa-===r----------- ==x-u=====.s....1 1Ap ;Grd. ; 1: H�' 1 Ad,) .F�g.Lene ; 6u5es FHF ;Cnf.Ped; Fedstrn Buitoni Arr . I !pr I ( R ii ! 1'iN ; Nm i tNb ! I i(pdihr )! Y N iMn.Timel Type! IE61+0.0! 2.0 1 N 1 0 i 0 0.90 ; 10 1 Y 1 16 i 3 1 ;W6 ;+0.0; 2.0 1 N 1 0 0 0.30 ; 10 I Y 1 16 ! 3 lNBI+0.0; 2.0 ! N ! 0 0 0.90 i 10 i Y 1 16 ! 3 lS6 ;+O.Oi 2.0 1 N I 0 0 0.90 ; 10 i 1' ; 16 ; 3 1 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------! iGrede +up,-down Nb-buses stopping/hr Mirn.Timing• mzn.green for !HV veh. : 4 whis FHF•peak-hour factor pedestrian crossing; INr. pi W.meneuvereihr Cr,f .Feds�Cnflctng pedsihr Arr .Type Type 1-5 t iFHASING a , + 1 i 1 A ! v ! G i i I v I ft i 1000 I v « 1 i v ITim- 1 G- 22. 11 G- 25.71 G- ?7.41 G- 2.61 G- 0.01 G- O.OI G- 0.01 G- 0.01 i i ng i Y+R- 31 Y+R- 31 Y+R- 31 Y+R- 311'+R- 3!1'+R- 311'+R- 311'+R- 31 IFtmdiAct { A i A I A I A I i------------------------------------------------------------------------------I ! Protected turner YY««^ 0000" I Fermitted turnst ++++" I Cycle Length 90 Sec! I -------------------------------------------------------------------------------! I MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAF by PSI I ! Inter aecIior,•GREENEURG AT MAFLELEAF Date MAY 1961 ------ ---1 !Ann Iyet •OFG/ME I TimeFeriod Anlyzd FM FEAT; HGURArea Type• CED XOther )1 iFroject No.266500 RECALC CityiState• TIGARD, OR iREV.EXIST.+LINCOLN IV ) i __��_--•--------------------------------------------------------------- i VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORt:SHEET ; ---------- ----------------------------------__-----------------------_--___-i 1 i , 4 5 6 1 7 : S i 9 : 10 iAppr . l Mvt . ; Mvt . 1 Feak i Flow )1 Lane :Flw rt )1Number i Lane Adj . i Frop. i IVulume; Hour : Rate ;Gr6up )1in Ln 1 of IUtilizl Flow 1 of I i H vph) :Factor : Vp i .'Grp VU:Lanes iFctr ,U: V,vphi LT or RTi 1 ; FHF )1 31'4 i ;ivph ) I N !Tb 9-4; 7 r 9;Flt , Prt )1 ------ ------' 1 LT i 3t 0.90 1 36; : )1 11 : 0.79 LT i ; EE 1 TH 1 91 0.90 1 1rv10 C : 46; 1 )1 1.00 ; 461 * 1 RT )1 491 ; (3.90 : 546)1 W )1 5461 i 1 .05 1 5731 1 .00 RT LT i 6961 0.90 ; 7761 .' i i ; 0.91 LT 1 1 WE 1 TH 1 221 0.90 ; 24 ; I 649; 2 i 1 .05 i 6911 + 1 FT i 441 0.90 )1 49; ; 1 i : 0.06 RT 1 i ----- 1 -----i- ----1•------:------)1----- ;- ---:------i------i-__ __i---------i LT i 5021 0.90 .' 5S6; i 1 1 0.46 LT i N6 )1 TH ; 4901 0.90 )1 544 ; v i )1203; 3 i 1 . 10 i 1323: « ; RT 91 ; 0. :0 ; i0i ; : ; 1 ; 0.06 RT LT ; 24 ; 0.90 ; 27: A : 27; 1 ; 1 .00 1 271 1 .00 LT 1 58 1 TH 643; 0.90 i 7141 N 1 7451 1 1 .05 ; 7621 )1 RT ; Z6 0.90 , 311 i i )1 i i 0.04 RT i i-------------------------------------------------------------------------------)1 ;LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-, *** - FROTCTO, +++ - FERMTTD, ### - FROTCTO & FERM 7011 ------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------1 A 1 C ' G 11 11 1 1 1 N : 0 ; i + ; AAAY i AAAA] , YYAAy ; �iAA A,: ; AAAA; 1 MYYA ; i v )1 v )1 v v ) ; i ---------------------------------------------------------------------------_. i MACEENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, uoinq NCAF by FSI 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Anter GREEN6URG AT f'AFLELEAF Date J16Y 1967 1 1Analyst DFG/'MEI TireFeriod Aniyzd FM FEAR; HOURAree Type C60 XOther ; :Project No.C66SOO RECALC City/Stete: TIGARO, OR x'REV.EXIST.+LINCOLN IV ) i----------------------------E„--_-----------------m------------_-----_--_--- i SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WGR�;SHEET j i.�-„--------.,=a- -----------------------------sea----------------_---------; LANE i ?, d i 5 : 6 i 7 1 ^o i 9 10 11 12 i 13 GROUF1Ideal ;No. ;Ln.W. :HvyVeh:Grede FJ,g. !6u56Ik!AreaTp;Rt Trn1Li. TrniAdjSet -----1 Set . :of ; Fw i Fhv ; Fg i Fp : Fbb i Fe 1 Frt ; Fit iF1wF1 ----- -------i------i '------1 5 1 i ci Flow 1LnLi•------�------; - :---- --' ------ Ap ;Mv :pcphgp ; N 1T.9-S :T.9-6 1T.9-7 iT.9-6 iT.9-9 iT.9-10; T.9-1117.9-121�vphg ) E8j Ci 1800 1 1 1 1 .000: 0.9501 1 .000: 1 .OF0; 1 .0041 1 .000; 1 .000; 0.9621 1714 i 101 :600 3 2 1 1 .000: 0.990: 1 .000: 1 .000: 1 .000; 1 .0001 0.750: 1 .0001 2673 WEE Ii 1600 1 2 1 1 .000' 0.990; 1 .0001 1 .1000; 1 .000; 1 .000; 0.9911 0.9201 3251 NB: Gi 1600 1 3 1 1 .000; 0.9901 1.0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .000; 0.9671 0.977; SiS7 i Al 1600 i i i I .000; 0.990: 1 .0001 1 .000: 1 .000: ] .000 i .0001 0.950 169- S81 N1 1600 1 2 1 1 .000; 0.9901 1 .0001 1 .000; 1 .0001 1 .000: 0.9941 1 .0001 3541 ;LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-1- - PROTCTD, +++ - FERMTTD, loft - FROTCTO 6 FERMTTD31 i------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 : A i C i G i i 1 N + j «YYY i Y4MYj ; •YY«y i «YNY ; M►**� i Mrd♦ i i 1 i + j + 1 + v i v i v 1 v 1 1 i-----------------------------------------------------------------------------i i MAChD,ILZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Fortland, OR, ue1ng NCAF by FSI i -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IInteraection•-GREENGURG AT MAPLEL.EAF Date'•MAY 1967 1 1Analy5t OF0/MEI TimeFeriod Anlyzd�FM PEAK HOURArea Type CED XOthers !Project No.266500 RECALC City/State•71GARD, OR 1REV.EXIST.+LINCOLN IV) s !of/-aaaas aafa-a---frs---a--------------------sa---a----afffa-f aaat-aa i CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET ! 1----a--s--a--a---------------a---f---a-------as-afa-..aria..-/-as ft—ft---salsa 1 !LANE GROL'F 1 3 ! 4 1 5 1 6 1 i 1 6 1 9 1 1-----------s Adjusted sAd.Sati Flow Ratio 1 Green 1Ln.Grp1 v/C iCrit. s 1 1 1 2 1 Flow Rate !Flw.Rt ! ! Ratio sCapoc. 1 Ratio 1 7 ; 3Appr . 1Mvmt. 1 v 1 a i v/e 1 g / C 1c,vph 1 X !Lane 1 ! ! i fvph) ltvphg )3 3/4 1 1 4x6 1 3/7 !Group! -----------1------ a-ff-----saf-aa-a;a--a--!1 asaf-a 1 as-aaaa!-aa as 1 i 1 1 i ! ! ! 1 1 E6 1 C i 46 - s 1714 1 0.026 - 1 0.031 1 53 1 0.699 1 ««« 1 4 1 Sia - ! 2673 1 0.214 - 1 0.316 1 646 1 0.676 1 - 1 i-----s-----i-----------1------s------------------l-------1------i ! ! 1 ! 1 1 1 i 1 1 i 1 ! WE 1 I i 691 - 1 3251 1 0.274 - i 0.305 1 991 s 0.699 s •«« 1 i-----i -----1-----------•i------1------------------s-------i------! ! N6 1 G 1 1323 - 1 5157 s 0.257 - ! 0.265 1 1471 1 0.699 1 ««« 1 1-----s --- --1------------l------1------------------i-------l------1 -------1-----! ! 1 A 1 27 - i 1693 i 0.016 — 1 0.246 ! 416 1 0.065 ! — 1 ! S$ ! N 1 762 - 1 3541 s 0.2ZI - i 0.246 1 670 1 0.699 1 1 I 1 i It 1 1 1 1 s 1-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- i !Cycle Length- R.05ec, Lost Time;Cycle,L- 12.05ec., 5tv/5 )ci- 0.779, Xc=0.6991 1-------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 !LANE GRGUF DIAGRAMS-[ Y«« - FRGTCTG, +++ - FE„MTTG, 4*4 - PROTCTO b PERMTTD] ! 1-----------•--------------•----------•------------------------------------------3 i A 1 C 1 G 1 1 1 N 1 « 1 « ! « ! + 1 + s « s 1 3 s 1 v i v ! v i v 1-------------------------------------------------•----------------------------1 ! MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAF by FSI 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------- 1lnteraectiur,•GFEEN6URG AT flAFL£LEAF Date MAY 1961 1 iAnaiyat DPG/'MEI Anlyzd FM TEAK HOURArea Type CEG XOtherl !Project Nu 266500 RECALC CityiState TIGARD, OF (REV.EXIST.+LINCOLN IV) i --------------------------------------------ax---------a--------------------- LEVEL-OF-SERVICE_WORr;SHEET--- i i --F a el Term Uelay _i Second Term Delay__1Tot .Delay_6_LOS LANE 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 6 9 i 10 i Ili 12 1 13 GROUFI vic i Green; Cycle Delay 1 Lane Delay 1Frgr5n1Lane Gp1 1-n1 ApprchlApr ----i Retial fiat IulLengih; dl iGruupl d2 1Factur ; Delay 1 Gpi Delay ;LOS I i Li X i g/C i i, ;5eC.%veh1Cap,C15ec%vehi FF i5eC%veh:LOS;5ec%veh1Tbl Ap1Mv1 1 i ( sec ) ; i (vph)1 1T.9-231 (6+6 )*919-1i i9-1 Eel CI 0.6991 0.0311 90.0; 33.031 531 59.921 0.65 1 79.01 ; F 1 23.261 C 1 01 0.676 0.3161 90.01 20.341 6461 1 .531 0.65 1 16.531 C 1 i W6i Ii 0.6931 0 3051 90.01 22.771 9911 1.691 0.65 26 .061 D 1 716.061 D 1 1 1 1 NGi G1 0.6991 0.2651 90.0; 23.501 14711 5.661 0.65 1 24.791 C 1 24.791 C 1 i 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 At 0.0651 0.2461 90.01 19.761 4161 0.001 1 .06 1 19.76; C i i 561 fJ1 0.6991 0.2461 90.01 24.961 670; 6.77; 0.65 1 26.691 0 1 26.391 D ; 1lnteraection Delay 25.64 eec/veh, Inter ,ection LOS D Table 9. 1 1 i------------------------------------------------------------------------------i ;LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-Iwww - FROTCTO, +++ - FERMTTO, !lith - FROTCTD 6 FERMTTDli 1 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------i ; r ; « i • i + 1 1 i i ; wrww ; rrww:•. ; rwwry ; rwwcy ; rrwwi i rrrr ; i i 1 v 1 v 1-----------------------------------------------------------------------------i f MACNEN2iE ENGINEERING, INC. , Furtiend, OR, tieing NCAF by FSI i ii--------------------------------------------------------- 1 INPUT WORKSHEET iIrter5ection�GREEN6URG V HWY 211 SOUTH Date�MAY 1961 { iAnalyat •DFOiMEi TirmeFeriod Anlyzd-.PM PEAK HOURArea Type: CED XOtherl iFroject NO.266500 RECALC CityiState--TIGARD, OR (REV.EXIST.+LINCOLN I� ) { 1 RR R RR RRR.R.RRR.R------------R........R RRR.......R................RRR R R R...... {VOLUME AND GEOMETRICS iGREENSURG NiS ST. { { 1 113451 1 { 0 t i S6 TOTAL 12.0 10: i { i v i { 12.0 1 -WB TOTAL{ i (N) 0 736 6091 TH LT 11i ----------------- i > -----------------1 1 NORTH v 1 I ; IIOENTIFY IN DIAGRAM ii.Volumea ------------------ i y -----------------1 12.Lanes,lane widths { TH RT i HWY 217 RAMFS I 13.Movemert5 by lane 425 1 12.0 i 1 EiW STREET i 14.Farking locations - 1 i 12.101 465 1 15-Say storge ingths 1 6333 16. 1slands EiB TOTAL RT 0 R- 1 1 5633 i i7.6u5 stops v 20 1 Nib TOTAL i 1TRAFF;C AND ROADWAY CONDiTICINS IAp ;6rri. i % HV i Adj .PNg.Lane i Buses h- iCnf.Fedi Fedstrn Buttoni Arr i tpr1 O. )i i YiN 1 Nm i tNb ) ; 1(Pd/hr )i YiN iMn.Time1 Type I EB i+2.101 2.0 1 N i fl i 0 ; 10.90 1 fl 1 N 1 0 3 ; iW6i+0.101 2.0 i N 1 01 0 0.9v� i Q { N 1 0 1 5 1 IN61+2,01 2.0 i N i 10 1 0 ; 0.90 1 0 i N 1 0 1 3 1 {SBi-2.0; 2.0 1 N { 0 0 ; 0.90 ; 0 i N , 0 5 1 {---------- -------------------------------------- - in green fori 1Grode. +up, down Nb•buses stoppinhr n r g� ftin.Timi - - i iHV� veh. , 4 whir FHF•peai•-hour factor pedestrian crossings ihm pko.mer,tuversihr Cnf.Feds .Crfictrg pedsihr Arr .Type Type 1-5 { --------__.s_-.-=s-z- iPHASitJi- a==�-=---- ;RR RRa-zzsszzuzszaea--R--RRR t.RRR-ate s-------ac r__.z---xzs s.z sa_zz-.R-RRR..RRR-Mal , s I A i G i 1 v iTim- i G- 29-St G- 22.21 G- 32.41 G- O.01 GR 0.Oi GR 0.01 G- 0.01 I ing 1Y+R- 311'+R- 311Y+R- 3iY+R- 31Y+R-- 311'+R- 31Y+R- 311'+R- 31 1Pimd/Acts A I A I A I { { { 1 1 I----------------------------'--------------------------------------- I Protected turnai «rrr" 0000 I Permitted turnal ++++' i Cycle Length 90 Sect {----------------------------------------------------------------- --t i MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI- I i --------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------•-- iinteraection•GRFEN6UFG 9 HWY 217 SOUTH Date MAY 1961 ; iAnmlySt -DFOiMEI TimcFeriod flnlyzd FM FErY: HCiURnrea Type CED XOtheri iFroject No.266500 RECALC City/State TIGARD, OF (REV.FXIST.+LINCOLN IV) I ------------------_---------_-----------------_------=............. _ I VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORT•:SHEET ; ----------_-___------____-z__n_=__-------_ --=--- i 1 1 3 4 S 6 ; 7 ; 6 9 10 it I IAppr. l Mvt . 1 Mvt . ; Feel flow ; Lar•e ;Flw rtlNumberl Lane Adj . Prop. I I ; ',Volume: Hour ; Fmle IGroup iin Ln i of :Utlllzl flow 1 of 1 : ;;vph) :Factor : Vp i :Grp VU:Lenee ;Fctr ,U; V,vph: LT or FTI FHF ; 3i4 ; :(vph ) I N ;Tb 9-4; 7 r. 91F11 , FrlI I i LT 1 4251 0.90 4721 A ; 472; 1 1 .00 I 472 , 1 .00 LT i I ES i TH i 0; 0.90 ; 01 ; 1 ; « i i I RT 1 206: 0.90 2311 Q I 231 ; 1 ; 1 .00 i 231 : 1 .00 FT 1 i-----i-----1-------;------:------i------I------i------i------;------:----------i i I LT 1 01 0.90 fl; i ; i i 1 0.00 LT i I WB i TH I 01 0.90 i Oi i ; i I • FT i 01 0.90 ; 0: ; 1 I 0.00 RT I I LT I 0: 0.90 all 1 i : 1 0.00 LT i I NB i TH 46S; 0.90 ; S391 E 1 539; 1 ; 1 .00 539; i I RT 1 96: 0.90 i 109; Q 1 Iasi 1 ; 1 .00 ; 109i 1 .00 RT i I LT i 609 0.90 ; 677i A I 6771 2 11 .05 1 7111 1 .00 LT I I SS I TH 1 7361 0.90 ; 616i E i 616; 1 i 1 .00 ; 6161 i i ; RT i 0; 0.90 fl1 1 1 0.00 RT i ---------------------------•---------------------------------------------------I ;LANE GROUPDIAGRAMS-C*— - FROTCTD, +++ - FERMiTO, ### - FROTCTD S FERMTTCM I-----------------------------------------------------------------------------i i A I E 1 M/.MM I 1fM1FMy I •IPM Ii ; i I i V I i i-----------------------------------------------------------------•.-----------i I MACNENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAF by FSI I ----------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- --------------------------------------------- ; Irtersection•GREENEURG 13 Hi,,' 271 SOUTH Ge,te .MAY 1967 ',Anelyst!DFGiMEI Tir,eFerird Ant zd•FM PEAK HOURArea T 1 ;Fro,lect No.266500 RECALL CityiStete TiSAFiu YPe` CED XOtheri OR (REV.EXIST.+LINCOLN IV) ------------- -------------------------------------- StiiURATION FLOW AGJUSfMENTWORf:SHEET s;-s~=.a. ---------------------------------------------------m----- ------------ .----.;-----------ass--= -----a-_a-a------- ------- LANEf ' 7 6 : 9 i 10 ; it 12 1 13 GROUFiIdeal :No. 1Lri.W. ;HvyVeh Grade Fkg. :Gue61r< AremTp;Ft Trn1Lt Trn'AdjSut --; Sai . •of t Fw ; Fhv i F gFp 1 Fbb ; Fa i Fri ; F11 ;F1wRt Fiow iLnet------'----- '------ APfMv ;PcPb9G1 N IT.9-5 iT.9-6 ;T.9-7 ;T.9-6 ;T.9-9 1T.9-10;T.9-11 :T.9-I� I (vphyl f Ai 1600 i 1 1 .400; 0.990; 0.990: 1 .000: 1 .0001 `1 .000: 1 .000; 0.950:11676 EBI I i i i ; : : Q1 IROS I 1 : 1 .000; 0.990: 0.990: 1 .0001 I .000 1 .000: 0.650: 1 .00o; 1500 W8: ------ ------ N61 E; 1600 1 1 i I .D00; 0.990; 0.930 1 .000 1 .000' 1 .000 1 .000 1.0001 1764 G+; 1500 ; 1 ; 11 .0001 0.990: 0.990; 1 .000; 1 .000: 1 .0001 0.650; I .ODO; 1500 --1--;------1---1-------;------1------'------f------ ; ------i ---- '----- A: 1600 2 1 1 .000: 0.990; 1 .010: 1 .000; 1 .000' 1 .000; 1 .000` 0.92 9201 1310 S6: E1 1600 1 1 t 1 .000; 0.9901 1 .010, 1 .000: i .OM101 1 .000: 1 .000; 1 .000: 1600 ------------------------ ------------------------------ if-ANE GROUF DIAGRAMS-I«•• - FROTCTD, +++ - FERPITTO, ### - FROTCTD 6 FERPITTO P ------------------------------ f A 1 E I Q 1 R ' , g 1 ♦�a• � MYikj ( Mli llM ' f i v i 1 :--------- f MACXENZIE_ENGINEERING, INC. , Fortland, OF, uning NCAP by FSI f -------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------- 11ntersection•GREENBURG 0 HWY 217 SOUTH Date-.MAY 1967 1 1Anaiy5t;OPDiME1 TimePeriod Ar,lyzd-.PM PEAT; HOURAroa Type; CBG XOtherf !Project No.286500 RECALC City/State•TIGARD, OR (REV.EXIST.+LINCOLN IV ) t tss--w-r---------------------------------- ...................f i CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET i t-i-----f---------------------------------------------------------------------t 1LANE GROUP t 3 f 4 t 5 f 6 f 7 1 8 f 9 S 1-----------i Adjusted IAd.Sati Flow Ratio i Green 1Ln.Grp1 viC ICrit . 1 i 1 f 2 1 Flow Rate iF1w.Rti f Ratio ICnpec. 1 Ratio 1 7 1 fAppr. fMvm1 . 1 v 1 s 1 via i g i C fc,vph 1 X iLane i I i 1 (vph) t(vphg)f 3i 4 i f 4x6 1 3/7 1 Group t I-----t-----I-----------;------t--------------- ,-------I------;.-.----t-----i I f A 1 472 - i 1676 1 0.262 - 1 0.328 1 549 1 0.859 1 *«« S I ES i f 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 S 1 0 1 231 - f 1500 1 0. 154 - 1 0.328 1 492 i 0.470 1 - 1 5-----f-----f-----------i------I------------------t-------t------i-- 1-----1 f i i i i 1 i 1 i i i WS i f i S i f S i f i f S i-----i-----1-----------i------i-----------------5-------5------I-------�-- i i i S i i f i i t t I N6 I E 1 539 - 1 1764 1 0.306 - i 0.352 1 621 i 0.666 1 ««« 1 i i Q 1 109 - 1 1500 1 0.073 - 1 0.352 f 526 1 0.207 i - S i-----i-----5-----------i------I----------------- 1-------f------I-------1-----1 I i A i 711 - 1 3312 1 0.21S - 1 0.247 1 618 1 0.669 1 ««* f i S6 i E 1 616 - 1 1600 1 0.454 - 1 0.SS ? 1076 1 0.7S9 1 - 1 I 1 f 1 1 I i i i i i------------------------------------------------------------------------•-----i iCycle Length- 90.Osec, Lost Time Cycle,L- 6.05nc, Stvis )ci- 0.802, Xc-0.8591 i------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------I iLANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-1*«« - PROTCTD, +++ - PERMTTO, ### - PROTCTO 6 PERMTT011 i----------------------------------------------------------------•-------------5 i A f E 1 fl i I 1 i v i 1 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------5 f MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAF by PSI I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _-__------- ------------------------------- ; Interaection•GREEN6URG e HWi 217 SOUTH Date MAY 1967 I ;Analyst GFO/MEJ TireFeriod Anlyzd FM PEAK; HOURArea Type C60 );O1her :Project No.266500 RECALC City/State TIGARD, OR \REV.EAIST.+LJNCGLN 1V ) 1 ----------------------------------------- ----------------- ----------momx<a.. _LEVEL-OF-GERVICE_WOR�;SHEET _ 1 ! : Fist Tera Delay :_Second Term Delay :1c,t .Delay_&_LOS LANE 3 ! 4 i 5 6 : 7 6 9 ! 10 : 11 : 12 13 GROUP! vic : Green; Cycle! Delay 1 Lane; Delay 1Frgran:Lane Gp; Ln; Apprch:Apr --- Ratio! Ratio;Lengthi dl !Group: d !Factor ! Delay ! fp; Delay :LOS 1 ! 2! X g/C ! C lsec; veh:Cap,cleec.ivehi FF 15eciveh;LOS;5ec/veh1Tb1 Ap;Mv! ! ! face )! : (vph )! ; T.9-13: (6+6 )+3;9-l ; 19-1 ! A! 0.659; 0.326! 30.0! 21 .51 : 5491' 9.06; 1 .00 ! 30.S7: D- , EE: : 1 i 1 1 ! ; t 1 ; 25.76; D : Q! 0.470 0.7,-6; 90.01 16.271 492: 0.S4 ; 0.65 1 1S.99; C 1 i --1 --1------1----- 1------1-------i-----1-------:-- W6! N6! E: 0.666: 0.000: 90.0; 34.20: 6211 6.791 0.65 ! 36.54 , D 1 35.29: D f; 0.20'71 0.0001 90.01 34.20: 5261 0.03: 0.65 i 29.09: D i 1 A; 0.6691 0.2501 90.0: 24.56: 6161 7.04: 1 .00 : 31 .63! D i S6: F ; 0.759; 0.250: 90.01 23.741 10761 2.22! 0.50 1 12.961 6 1 21 .651 C ------------------------------------------------------- fInterbection Delay 25.73 5eciveF1, Intereectlon LOS D Table 9. 1 1 I----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ' !LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[*** - FROTCTD, +++ - FERMTTD, ### - FROTCTO & FERMTTDJI 1----------------------------------------------- 1 A i E , i YYYY ! YYYY} i YYYY i i 1 i 1 Y i 1 i i ! i v i i------------------------------------------------------- IMACfi;ENZIEENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAF by FSI -- - t ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- i INFUT WORKSHEET j iInter section-.GREEN6URG & HWY217 NORTH Date.-MAY 1961 t tAria lyst •DPOiMEI TimeFeriod Anlyzd1FM PEAK HOURAree Type CBD KOtheri iFroject No.266500 RECALC CityiState TIGARD, OR iREV.EXIST.+LINCOLN IV) t j------- {{-----am.----{------------{---{{-...........----------.........{----{ 'VOLUME AND GEOMETRICS 1GREEN6URG N/S ST. t 40% RTQIt i 112363 i t 302 ItEDoicTtbN t S6 TOTAL 1 1 2 1 - { ti i 12.0 t t 0 <- ( 5073 1 { i 8p% v y 1 t 12.0 t -W6 TOTAL i i iN ) 66 1152 Ot RT TH 1 205 v t ------------ < 1 -----------------t i NC6F TH 1tv-DUM004 v ---RT-12.0'-1 i t v---L'i-12.0'-1 { f i f 1IDENTIFY IN DIAGRAM t t1 .Volumes ---------•-------- < i -----------------t 12.Lanes, lane widths i LT TH t HWY 217 RAMPS t i3.Movemente by lane 0 i 12.0 t 1 EiW STREET t i4.Farking locations - j j 12.Oi A92 15.6ay storge ingths I 03 -'s O i 1 1 i 205 :'•'� 0 t i6. I51ands E!B TOTAL - i i ( 6973 t 17.6us stops v O i i N%6 TOTAL i iTRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS { j----------------------------------------------------------------------------a t !AptGrd. t % HV i Adj .Pkg.Lene 1 Buses i PHF jCnf.Fedt Pedatrn Button! Arr. 1 ipr1 ifi )i i YiN t Nm t tNb ) i iipd/hr ii Y/N 1Mn.Timet Typei 1EBi+0.0i 2.0 i N 1 0 i 0 i 0.90 i 0 i N 1 0 1 5 i 1WB +0.0t 2.0 1 N i 0 t 0 t 0.90 i 0 i N 1 0 1 3 1 1NBi+O.Oi 2.0 1 N i 0 i 0 i 0.90 i 0 1 N 1 0 1 4 1 iSE:+0.0! 2.0 1 N i 0 i 0 t 0.90 1 O i N t 0 i 3 j i------•-----------------------------------------------------------------------t 1Grade• +up,-down Nb�buses etoppingihr Min.Timing-- min.green for i IHV veh. 4 whls FHF�peak.-hour factor pedestrian crossing! ;Nm1pkg.rianeuversihr Cnf.Peds•Cnfictng pedsihr Arr.Type Type 1-5 1 j--------------------{--------------------------------{---.{--r----{---.--{---{ 1PHASING i j-{{---{------------------------......-.......................---....... I A i i v { « t { { { { { i G t t i v I A f <«« j i M t frim- 1 G- 15.41 6- i 6- 25.41 6- 0.01 G- 0.01 6- O.Ot 6- 0.et 6- 0.01 I i ng t Y+R- r;X i Y+R- 31 Y+R- 3 t Y'+R- 31 Y+R- 31 Y+Ft- 31 Y+R- 31 Y+R- 31 W imd/ACt1 A i A f A t f i t ; t f---------------------------------------------------------------------------• --t I Protected turna� ««««^ 0000" s Permitted tjrne, ++++" t Cycle Length 90 Sect i------------------------------------------------------------------------------f I MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAF by PSI f ------------------------------------- --------------- 11nierbectic- (=rEENBURG 9 HW'Y217 NORTH Date MAi' 1967 1 ;rinelyat OFC,if1El TimeFeriod A•,Iyzd-FM PEAK HOUR Area Type- CEG XOtherl ;Project Nu.26GSoo REC.ALC CiIy/St ate' TIGARD, DR (REV.EXIST.+LINCOLN IV) i ---------------- i = VOLUME AG3USTMENT WORKSHEET i =----------------------------------------------==.=_. i 1 i 3 4 5 1 6 ; i 1 6 9 ; 10 iAppr . i M,,I Mvt . Feak 1 Flow ; Lar,c ;Flw -t :Number Large i Adj . 1 Frop. i Vulume; Hour i Rate iGroup iin Ln ; of Wiih.z1 Flow ; of 1 i( vph ) iFar ior1 Up 1 ;Grp VU:Lanen iFctr ,U1 V,vpW LT or RT; FHF 4 livph ) i N ; Tb 9-41 7 x 9;F11 , Frti - 1 1 LT i 0; 0. 90 i v`11 ; i xi = =0.00 LT t I E6 TH 1 0; 0.90 i 0i i 1 PT ; 0; 0.90 i 0; 1 1 i 1 0.00 RT i LT 1 205; 0. 90 ; 2261 A ; 2261 1 i 1 .00 ; ;_26; 1 .00 LT 1 1 W6 i TH 1 0 0.90 i Oi RT 1 302 ; 0. 90 i 336, O i 336; 1 ; 1 .00 i 3351 1 .00 RT i LT05 0.90 ; 2261 A ; 226 i 1 .00 i 2261 1 .00 LT i i N6 1 TH 1 492; 0.90 547; E ; 547 l i 1 .00 1 5471 « i i RT 1 0; 0.90 ; 0; ; ; i i ; 0.00 RT i LT i 01 0.90 i 01 ; 1 i 0.00 LT i I S6 i TH 1 1152; 0.90 ; 1260; E i 1260; i 1 .05 ; 13d41 « i I ; RT i 661 0.90 i 96; t3 i 96; i 1 .00 ; 961 1 .00 RT i i-------------------------------------------------------------------- i iLANE GROUP DIAGFAftS-1 ««« - PROTCTD, +++ - FERfiTTO, *## - FROTCTD 6 FERMTTDIi i------------------------------------------------------------ ; A i E Q 1 ; i------------------------------ ---------------;----;-------------y-------------- i I MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INC. , Fortla -d DR uein NCAF b FSI i ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ; Irnternectaon GREENEURG Q HW1217 NORTH Date MAY 1961 ;Arlalynt -DFOiMEI TireFer >.ud Anlyzd•FM FEAK HOURArea Type C60 XOther ; ;Fro,)ect No.766500 RECALC City/State TIGARD, OR 1REV.EXlST.+LINCOLN 3V ) i . SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WOFf:SHEET ; LANE ; 3 ; d ; 5 ; 5 ; 7 6 9 ; 10 ; 11 ; 12 1.3 GROUPIIdeai iNo. 0Ln.W. 0HvyVeh1Grade FM g. ;6ue61M. ;AreaTp;fit Trrl;Lt Trr Adj Sat - - Sat . ;of i Fw ; Fhv ; FU ; Fp 1 Fbb Fa crt Fit ;F3wRt 1 ; 2; Fluw ;Lne1------;------; ------i------;------ ----- ------;------; S Ap ;Mv ;pcphgp ; N ;T.9-5 ;T.S-6 ;T .9-7 ;T .9-6 ;T.9-9 ;T . 9-101T.9•-1 . ;T.9-12;( vptig ) E611 1 i -- ;--;------;---'------ ---- A; 1600 ; 1 ; 1 .000; 0.990; 1 .000; 1 .000; 1 .000; 1 .000; 1 .000; 0.950; 1693 W61 t i i ; ; i I ; ; 1 1 Q1 1600 ; 1 ; 1 .000; 0.990; 1 .000; 1 .000' 1 .000; 1 .000; 0.650; 1 .000; 1515 '--' ------'---' ---'---•' ------ I I ------';-------I----•--1------ I--•---- A; 1600 ; 1 ; 1 .000; 0.9901 1 .000; 1 .000; 1 .000; 1 .0001 1 .000; 0.950; 1693 N6; E; 1600 i 1 i 1 .000; 0.990; 1 .000; 1 .000; 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .000; 1 .000; 1762 1 , I 56; E ; 1600 ; 2 ; i .0001 0.990; 1 .0001 1 .0001; 1 .000; 1 .0001 1 .000; 1 .000; 3564 i 0; 1600 ; 1 ; 1 .000; 0.990; 1 .000; 1 .000; 1 .000; 1 .000; 0.650; 1 .0001 1515 ;LANE GROUF DIAGRAMS-i •YY - FROTCTD, +++ - FERMTTO, !that - PROTCTO B FERMTT03 ; --------------------------------•-------------------------------- -------1 A ; E ; Q 1 1 YYYY 1 YYYYj i YYYY ; 1 I 1 I v I , 1 -------------------------------------------------------------.--------------.- 1 MACCENZIE ENGINEERING, it3C.. , Furtiand, OR, u! irig NCAF by FSI ; Intersection GREEN6URG 0 HW'Y217, NORTH -- Date MAI' 1967 - ---- t ;Aralyst Of-C MEI T1meFeriod Anlyzd FM FEAT: HOURArea Type".. CBD AOtheri iFroject No,266500 RFCALC CityiS1a1e. T1SARD, OR iREV.EXIST.+LINCOLN IV) ; - CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET { -------------------- --------_---.-, a �ae_- ------I {LANE GROOF i 3 i 4 i 5 6 i -7 6 - i 9 i {------------i Adjusted iAd,Sat ! Flow Ratio Green iLn.Grpi viG :Crit , ; i 1 i 2 i Flow Fete :F1w.Rti ! Ratio iGapac . ; Ratio i 7 i 1 Appr , i Mvm1 . i v i s i i s i g i C ;c ,vph ii :Lane i { i (vph ) 1 � vp+1y )i 4 i 4v6 i 7 .Gr oup .1 i I E6 i i i i i 1 i i i i-----:-----i------------ ------ -----------------i-------i------ ' - i i A i 226 - i 1653 i 0.135 - 0.262 ! 476 0.477 i i W6 i i i i { { 1 0 : 336 ' � - i .LLL 0.26G { 0.766 � 0 � 42 7 i { ««« { {-----i-----i-----------i------{------------- --i-------i------i-------i-----i i i A i 226 - i 1693 1 0. 135 - i 0. 171 ! 290 : 0.766 i N6 i E i 547 - i i762 i 0.307 - i 0.6Si : 1160 i 0.4'112 i {- ---{-__-- ;-----------{------ i--- ---------------, -------' i S6 i E i 1344 - : 3564 i 0.377 - i 0.460 i 1711 i 0.766 i ««Y i Q i 96 - ; 151b : 0.063 - i 0.460 i 727 i 0, 132 1 {--------------•------------------------- -------------------------------------- iCycle Length- 90.05ec , Lost TimeiCycle,L- 6.0sec , S�via )ci- 0.734, Kc-0.766 : i------------------------------------ :LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-(*Y« - PROTCTO, +++ - PERMTTO, *## - PROTCTO & PERMTTD3i {----------------------------------------------------------- { { A i E { Y N Y M { M Y«Y { Y«Y Y { i i i { v { { 1---------------------------------------------- --------------y i MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC, , Portland OR uein NCAP b PSI { 11nier5ectior, GREENSURG 0 HW'i217 NORTH Date MAI' 1961 1 !Analyet DFO/MEI TimeFerlod Anlyzd FM FEAK HOURArea Type CBD XOther ' iFroject No.266S00 REC6LC City/State TIGARD, OR \REV.EXIST.+LINCOLN IV ) ! a LEVEL-OF-SERVICE_WOR :SHEET 1 Fir-5t Term Delay i..___'ir,cond Term De:1ay__1Tot .Delay_6_LOS LANE 3 1 4 i 5 6 7 6 i 9 i 10 1 fill 12 l 1a ;ROUF; vic 1 Green! Cycle', Delay ; Larel Delay :Prgr5n1Lane Gp; Ln! ApprchlApr -----1 natio! RatioiLength! dl !Group! d2 !Factor ! Delay i Gp: Delay ;LOS 1l , 2 X i giC 1 C ,beclvehlCap,c :beciveh, FF 15eciveh�LOS,eeciveh,Tbl AplMv ; i lbec )i h )i iT.9-13116+6 )•919-1i i9-1 EB; i ! f i i ! ! 0.00; • ! At 0.477: 0.2621 90.0! 20.36! 4761 0.S9; 1 .00 i 20.96! C 1 1 W61 i i i i ! ; i ; f i 23.201 C f Q1 0.766 ; 0.2621 90.01 22.641 427! 6.44 ; 0.65 1 24.72 : C i 1 i At 0.766 ; 0. 1711 90.0; 27. 14 : 290: 9.041 1 .00 : 35. 16; 0 1 ; N61 E! 0.472i 0. 1711 90.0: ZS.SS; 1160: 0.74: 0.62 ! IS.99; C i 21 .931 C --1--1------1- ----; ----- ; -------1-----i-------1------i-------i ---f-------i -- i S6; El 0.7661 0.000: 90.0! 34.201 17111 1 .761 0.65 1 30.571 D 1 30.471 D : Q: 0. 132; 0.000! 90.0; 34.20; 727; 0.011 0.65 ! 29.071 D 1 f fInterbectior, Delay 26.61 beciveh, Interbection LOS D Table 9.1 1 i-----------------------------------------------------------------------------I ;LANE GROUF DIAGRAMS-t*** - PROTCTD, +++ - FERMTTD, 1t>kl< - PROTCTD 6 FERMTTDII 1-----------------------------------------------------------------------------f i A t E i ♦iii ; iiiM} 1 iiMi 1 , 1 i i v i--------------------------------------------------------------------- - 1 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Foriland, OR, using NCAP by FSA LOCATIOW OAt,' @ 95TH iNAME L.O.S.-EXIST+LINC. IV -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- HOURLY VOLUMES i VOLUMES IN FCFH N i Magor bireet OAK i ---..---a-------ass=s...-as.------ --- i vas-------------------=.-------sas.aa N- i -VS--- 66 i ,,---VS--- Grade 146---V2-- v---V4--- 5 i -VZ-- v---V4--- 5 0% 46---V3---v N- 1 ; ---V3---v -.a.-.--.a.as..-. i i ---------- --------------- --------- Hate of Countb� i i i i i i i MAN. 1967 RECALC i Vi V9 ; X STOF i i V7 V9 i Time Feriod; i I ; I YIELD FM FERE HOUR i 25 10; i 2S 10 Approach Speed Minor Street• Grade i 25 95TH 0% i FHF 65 N= i Population. 1000000 ------.aa_=a_---=__==.==za=z===a_.-.=___===._z= VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS ------- --------------------------- - Movement ------ -------------------------- -Movement no. i Z i 3 i 4 i S i 7 ; 5 i ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------- Volume (vph ) i 146 i 46 i 5 i 66 i 25 . 10 i ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Voi(pcph ),-ee Table 10. 1 ;XXXXXXXXIXXXXXXXX1 5 ixxxxxxxxi 25 i 10 i ......a..a.=------ar.as -----------------a==,==a=_.-= STEF 1 RT From Minor =trEEt ...........a saw.n�.axa_=ss.sss=.-ssx=ns-....cxc===zxx= =ac=c==x-casaz=_as=ssasss-caov Conflicting Fluws, Oc lit V3+VZ= 24 + 146 - 170 vph(Vc5 ) Critical Gap, Tc i Tc- 5 bets ( Tab. 10.2 ) Potential Capacity , Cp i Cp9- 1000 pcph (Fig. 10.3) Actual Capacity, cm i Cm9=Cp9= 1000 pcph a.aa.sacscss=._s=z-assssc--scs-.c===T.=_.c=c=aaa..ans-src_aaswaay.:r..s..s-.ssccr=i__== STEF 2 LT Frcm Mnjur :itreet i v-- V4 a.aa.aaas====sr._sszs,c e_s..,sr_:s-c.ss=s=asx:==:cel=sa=ss.=s_saasa_.=sses_s..sscea=xsa Conflicting Flows, V(. i V3+V7- 46 + 146 = 194 vph(Vc4 ) Critical Gap, Tc i Tc= 4.S becb (Tab. 10.2 ) Foiential Capacity, L'p i Cp4- 1000 pcph (Fi4.10.3) % of Cp utilized and Impedance Factor i (V4iCp4 )xi00= .S% Fd,. i Actual Capacity, Cm (Fig. 10.S ) i Cm4=Cp4> 1000 pcph ..a........a......a.a.aa.......vsvvsv......a...svcsa_aaaava------.--:ass..ssac�.�nsc STEF 3 LT From Minor Street I <-\ Vi ------------ ------------- ------- s,o..as r.a=.s......-ss-c=as=a--ass:c=s.xs Conflicting Flowb, Vc i 1;2 V3+V2+VS+V4- ; 24 + 146 + 66 + 5 - 243 vptl(Vc7 ) Critical Grip, Tc i Tc= 6 becb (1ab. 10.2 ) Fotential Capacity, Cp I Cpl- ^rSG pcph (Fig. 10.3 ) Actual Capacity, Cm i Cm7-Cp7xF4- 7S6 x i - 756 pcph ..-v .........a..a...a.......a.........a.a.................................. SHARED LANE CAPACITY SH - (V7+V9 )/( (V7/Cm7 )+(V9/Cm9 ) ) if lane ib bhared CF CF LOS i_(?5 MOVEMENT V(FCFH) CM(FCFH ? CSH(FCFH ? (CM-V ) (CSH-V ) CM C.�iI, a.. am".............a..aaa.a==ss=a=csRs=ss r.=e------bac-.--.----bas-ass, --s ---- ^r 25 7S6 E i.D 731 776 A A 9 10 1000 613 990 77p A A 4 5 1000 995 A LOCATION•^HALL 0 OAK NAME:L.O.S.-EKIST+LINC. IV --------------------------- ---------------------------- HOURLY VOLUMES Grade 0% { N 62 i 1 V12 { { 1 22 1 <N { Vil 1 30 1 I ff-=----f----=r..:wca,=xa V10 ff=--a:=-----ffff--f-a- N= 1 v - ----------V6-- 30 Grade 0% � 47 --U1------------^ ----------VS-- 486 N- 1 441 -- v-----------V4-- 35 t)` - - ' Major road Grade 0% 11 --V3------------v 13 HALL VI 1 -----^------=.----az=-n-af 20 1 i 1 STOP xx 1 V6 1 { YIELD I N- 1 36 1 1 Date of Counta•MAIJ. 1967 REC i V9 I Time Feriod:FM PEAK HOUR 1 Minor road 97 1 Frevailing Speed�35 1 OAK 1 PHF� .65 1 Grade 0 % 1 Fopulatxon:75000 c a ..2 a x-_=t=a-==----------------- ----ff----ff----f........... VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS ----- ------- ----------------------- ------------------- Movement no. { 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 S 1 6 1 7 1 6 1 9 1 10 1 I1 1 12 t --------------------- ------------------------- o ume �vph) 1 471 4411 111 351 4661 301 201 36 971 301 221 621 Vol(pcph ),fiaG. 10. 1 , 49{X>;XXIk};K};1 '61XxXx- V 9 - �---------------- - 1KKXX 201 36 � 71 301 221 621 VOLOMFS IN FCFH 1 62 1 V12 1 I 1 22 i I Vll 1 I 1 30 m _x==--=__ ----------- iV10 I __ <1 v 49 --U1---------- 6 _- --V3------------v <1 i! ---------n------------ V7 t I -=a=x-a=== -----_ i 20 1 i 1 1 VB i I 1 36 1 1 I V9 i I 97 1 tKA11ON HALL @ OAK NAME L .(i.S.-Ex1ST+LINC. IU .................... aaa e:c f: ------=afem=ae=aac==-asa.m-am-mm-af.mmamaa ammmmmfeR STEF 1 FT From Minor Street i-i V9 -i V12 mammaa---assmv_z+casssas---R------------a -------= ar..ammam...masa sssaammmmmm-R Confiiciing Flows, UL 1 1i2 V3+V2-Vc9 1 1i2 V6+VSmVcIZ 1 6+ 441- 447 vph 1 15+ 486- 501 vph Critical Gap, Tc (Tab. 10.2 ) 1 5.5 ( secs. ) 1 5.5 (Seca. ) Potential Capacity,Cp(Fig10.3 )1 Cp9 - 665 pcph 1 Cp12 m 624 pcph % of Cp utilized 1 (V9iCp9)x100- 14.6% 1 (V12iCp12 )x100- 9.9% Impedance Factor, F (Fig.10.5 )1 F9- .9 1 F12- .94 Actual Capacity, Cm 1 Cm9-Cp9= 66S pcph 1 CmI2-Cpl2- 624 pcph as -------v _=m-am-m-----z ::-==:s_c-r_os.to_r_s_sayv-----------m----aaaac FF LT From Magor Street. I v-- V4 1 - V1 == sas===.............. as Conflicting Fluwt,, Vc 1 V3+V2-Vc4 1 V6+V5-Vcl 1 11+ 441- 452 vph 1 30+ 466= 516 vph Critical Gap, Tc ( Tab. 10.2 ) 1 5 (Seca. ) 1 5 ( Seca. ) Potential Capacity,Cp(Fig10.3 )1 Cp4 - 7S3 pcph 1 Cpl - 697 pcph % of Cp utilized 1 (V4iCp4 ),100= 4.8% 1 (Vl/Cpl )x100- 7% Impedance Factor , F (Fig. i0.5 )1 F4- .97 1 FI- .96 Actual Capacity, Cm i Cm4-Cp4= 753 pcph 1 Cmlmcpl- 697 pcph -fasmas_asasaammaaa.ss.c=xamss=s_,saaasss s_=e ssssc=xess-s=aces-=c>r_cascn�.=za==e>=sef STEP 3 TH From Minor Street 1 U6 1 v V11 set=._=esm .mass�uze-s_sm==eesc=z=n:====__�.===-ss==_e=s=-as:ams-sc=amssesca=es==.,. Conflict-ng Flows, llc 1 .5V3+VZ+VI+Vb+V5+V4-UcBi .5V6+V5+V4+V3+VZ+Vi=Vc11 1 6+ 441+ 47+ 30+ 1 15+ 466+ 35+ 11+ 1 466+ 35- 1045 vph 1 441+ 47- 1035 vph Criticei Gap, Tc (Tab.10.2 ) 1 6 ( Secs. ) 1 6 ( Seca. ) Potential Capacity,Cp(Fig10.3 )1 CpG - 2S7 pcph 1 Cp11 - 261 pcph % of Cp utilized 1 (V6/CpB )x100= 14% 1 MI Cpii )x100- 6.4% Impedance Factor , F (Fig. 10.S )1 PB- .91 1 F11- .95 Actual Capacity, Cm 1 CmB-Cp8xPlAP4 1 Cmll-Cp11xP1xF4 1 239= 257x.96x.97pcph 1 243= 261x .96x.97pcph mRas:-.arac:._zens-sx=n:_oass:,az ssma:xa---- __ STEP 4 LT From Minor Street -\ V7 1 \ VI maasiccsa.�xns_r.xeccv_sssn=,=s__=z_.eases::=_scStasesczz�e_zmmacca:-m.asaa>_v:nsn.=ia Conflicting Flows, Vc 1 Vc8( 5tep3 )+V11+V1:17-=0c71 Vcll( 5tep3 )+V6+V9-Vc10 1045+ 22+ 62= 1129,/ph 1035+ 36+ 97- 1166vph Critical Gap, Tc (Tab. 10.2 ) 1 6.5 (Seca. ) 1 6.5 ( Seca. ) Potential Capacity,Cp(Fig10.3 )1 Cpl - 191 pcph Cp10 - 180 p'-ph Actual Capacity, Cm 1 Cm7-Cp7xF1xF4xPllxF12 1 Cm10-Cp10xF4xFixP6xF9 1 - 191,,.96x.97x.95x.9d f - 160�. .97x.96x.91x .9 1 159 pcph 1 - 137 pcph m wa a=s�aase-.a:_h nes.ries-:.:=gym:=e a.+ -----a --------- --saes-ma .«..sa-=ns,ea LOCATIOW HALL @ OAK NAME L.O.S.-EXIST+LINC. IV SHARED LANE CAPACITY APPROACH MOVEMENTS 7,6,9 CR CR LOS LOS MuVFMENT Vx'FCFH ) CM(FCPH ) CSH PCPH) (CM-V ) rCSH-'J ) CM CSH ..................=.x n=m z-y a=_.....cis-..a x..............a..-............. 7 Z0, 159 362 139 209 D C 6 36 239 36, 203 G09 C C 9 1 66S .367 566 209 A C AFFROACH MOVEMENTS 10 11 , 12 ,:R CR LOS LOS MOVEMENT V;Fi_YH i CM(PCFH r CSHt PCPH) (Ch -V) CSH—V ) CM CSH ax-s .• x=.------ --_ =-.....................`S...xzxy a.......i.911.i.. i.i.. 10 vl 137 279 107 165 0 p 11 243 279 221 165 C D 12 6:- 624 279 562 165 A D MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS 1 ,4 MG'Jt-rtEr;; U FC H ) CMt FCFH ) M CM-V ) l CS i -------------.c x x c s y=-.....................=--.-.......a - i a, 697 646 4 7533 717 A CI"i'1Mf N7 LOCATION GREENSURG 0 OAE iNAME�L.O.S.-EXIST+LILAC IV ------------------------ HOURLY VOLUMES 1 VOLUMES IN FCPH N i Magor at, Lei G.F .Si5OTH 1 --------aaa---aa----c-a--a+:!! ; -------! a�s---.-s.- N- 2 �.---V5--- 1671 ; - Grade 676---VZ---i v---L'4--- 16 ---V2---"- ex 116---V3---v Nt 4 V3---v a----a---- ------ <i ii !_amaa---- , c�a laces_-a---Rasa ; Date of Counts-- f i 1 ; MAY 1987 RECALC 1 V7 V3 X STGF 1 V'7 Vy Time Feriock 1 ; YIELC, FM PEAK HOUR i 1 44 ; ; 1 44 Approach Speed Minor Street Grade 3S Gif: 0% FHF� .65 Na i Population-. 1000000 aria---aaaaaaaaa.--%— ....... ra-=tax VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS --------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ ---- Movement no. i Z f ,3 • 4 i 5 f 7 i 3 t ----------------------------------------------------•------------------------ -- , Volume (vph ) i 878 It 116 i 16 i 1671 f 1 i 44 f ---------------------------------------------------------------- --------------- Vol�pcph ),5ee Table 10. 1 ;XXXXXXXXiXXXXXXXX : 17 ;XOX XXXXi 1 1 44 f aRlxxzllaaoxxx-¢xlaaala:laaaaaxaxcx=satxxz._!zx_�__ccala_ax------=aa!!llaasasaaaa STEP 1 RT From Minor street 3 --------a------x Confiictinrw Fiuwa, Vc I;'2 V3+V2- 59 + 4-59 = 496 vph(Vc9) Critical Gap, Tc 1 Tc- 5 seta ( Tab. 10.2 ) Potential Capacity, Cp i Cp9- 712 pcph Actual Capacity, Cm i Cm9=Cp9- 712 pcph --lasa!!!!lalaa!!xalRa=scat--scx=c_.zz xoaaalas a=xxxlasaa--1--.----- STEP 2 LT From Major Street U4 Conflicting Flows, Vc i V3+V2- 116 + 676 - 996=vph(Vc4 )= ast - Critical Gap, Tc 1 Te- 5 sect (Tab. 10.2 ) Potential Capacity, Cp f Cp4- 392 pcph (Fig. 10.3 ) % of Cp utilized and Impedance Factor i (V'4iCp4 )x100= 4.3% F4- .97 Actual Capacity, Cm (Fig. 10.S ) 1 ( m4-Cp4- 392 pcph !!llalaa!!l-zzlxma.—=�c..!!a.-!!!x!-.!laa-ax-!a¢-r¢!-..alta c.-:x R.r-mc¢a_azraaw.nr_zr. STEP 3 LT From Minor Street i V7 aacsaszar-_raRaalcrsaa__axa.i._c-sza_x_,c.rvx!_a-a=r.scn.a-a_-.-x_taaal:asa-__>:t;,asaama<a Conflicting Flows, Vc 1 1i2 V3+VZ+VS+V4a f 59 + 676 + 1671 + 16 - 1700 vph(Vc7 ) Critical Gap, To 1 Tc- G.5 Beta (Tab. 10.2 ) Fotentiai Capacity, Cp 1 Cpl- BS pcph (Fig. 10.3) Actual Capacity, Cm 1 Cm7-Cp7xP4- 65 x .97 - 62 pc�fi aaaaaaaaaaaalaalaalR.:.--z.a=x!l-a-ma!!a-a:aaaaaasaaaala!lasaaaaaalz ax-!-Ra-x----a SHARED LANE CAPACITY SH - (V7+V9)i( (V7/Cm7)+(V9iCm9 ) ) if lare 11 :hared CR CR LOS LOS f101'EMENT V(FCFH) CM(FCFH ) CSH(FCFH ) (CM-V) (CSH-V ) CM CSf-i ------------ a a!4!a!a.I-a-R!--a------t a v...........n- 7 1 62 606 E 1 !!l=563 E 1b►Al- 9 44 712 606 666 S63 AA MevemeNr 4 lI 392 J7� a i LvCATION•GREE%URG 0 LOCUST NAME�L.O.S.-EXIST+LI,NC. IV -------------------------------------------------------- KJRLY VOLUMES Grade 0% i N 1 30 ; f V12 ; t 1 5 1 N> i I Vil I t I 1 20 i ..........s wf asss a a a s t 1 1 U 1 0 aas........ t asas as a s Na -V6-- is Crede O1: <----------VS-- 529 Nt 2 10 --V1------------" v----------V4-- 45 471 --V2----------- Major road Grade 0% 45 --V3------------v <1 I> G.6.NORTH ss sa a a x ss x a s s ss a s .... V 7 1 ; i s tar a s as w w saa s a a aaa s t i 105 1 1 1 STOP xx I V6 1 1 YIELD I Na 2 6 1 1 Date of CountstMAY 1967 REC V9 I Time Period PP1 PEAK HOUR t minor road 50 1 FrevailinW Speed-35 I LOCUST 1 PHF-. .65 I Grade 0 X 1 FopuiationA 000000 asxxaxr.taasaass atassaast assstassssssasxxx::-xa= .............asass aaws•as �.:LUME ADJUSTMENTS --------------------------------------- ---------- Mwemtnt no. I 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 6 f 9 f 10 1 11 1 12 1 ---------------------------- ------------- -------------- ------------------------ Volume tvph ) 1 101 4711 4S1 451 542-91 151 1051 6i 501 201 51 301 ----- -------------------------------------- -- -` VW;)cph ),Tab. 10.11 101XXXXIXXXXI 471XXXXIXXXXf 1051 6 : 501 2x01 5 301 ssaatasasws ssasasaaws..ssat ssatwsssas assn -----------=---sax�axxx ::xxa.s.ax:c.xx:a VOLUMES IN FCFH t 1 1 30 I V12 1 I 1 5 1 I I Vil 1 1 1 1 20 1 IV10 ........... <I v f > ^----------V6--- _- ----------'JS-- 10 --VS------------^ v----------V4-- 47 x- --V2------------> =a --V3------------v <t I > ssaassatsat ssu aaatasat V7 1 ; tars as sswsasasassrsxmz i 105 1 1 1 I VB I t t V9 i t 50 I gram 6" < 6" 10 GA 40' -0" MAX 15' 0" MIN R N LINE MESH -- .\ DRIVEWAY t A L 7 —- J N OPTIONAL W SIDEWALK LOCATION B K - L_- ------ -____J - CaVER��IZE FFlAM� � LwRATt= a CONTRACTION JOINT CURB Jl GUTTER-- / ® -,_ EXPANSION JOINTS I / - SIDEWALK ,- CURB JOINT EXPANSION JOINTS F u:E OF C U R EIA6" MIN. 6" MIN 30 ' ' 20' ' O" MAX— 20 O" MAX. !1-1i--•I 1 hvc PLAN Z 1 I :24" ?_4" rVM'T PVM'T 1 TAP11�IZ TAPER I - 1/2" EX'OSURE 134 Lij NOTE : 4RATE TO PLAN VIEW SAWCUT SAND PLACESI COLD IJOINTT. LL.1 C3E F LASED AT Q 0 q"x 12 ' I ONG A136 WEEP FINISHED ( W/OVERLI-'Y) SEE DV+G. NO. CS- 306 — [c �s BRAIN AT SUB-GIRAD5 ELEVATION EL E V AT I O N B-B N (n z z O0 PVH',r SLOP _ IU Wcr z Y C. Qo STREET J O ao 0 1 Z l 5" N CONCRETE TO BE n°• o^ X '.° °� 10 GA. MESH � ~ ^ 3000 PSI - 28 GAYS, h 1. 1-1/2" Aeov1 j 2" OF 3!4" MINUS r' �i� 6 SACK MIX °, 5 BASE 80 0 R' SECTION Ay-A I. CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM BREAKING STRENGTH 09 3000 PS I p n I AFTER 28 DAYS 6 SACK MIX . O > v 2. CURB JOINT SHALL BE A TROWELED JOINT WITH A MRIIIMUM !/2" ALONG BACK OF CURB. �� I 3. EXPANSION JrINTS SHALL BE 1/2• PREMOLOED ASPHALT IMPREGNATED n: MIN. G" 2'-D� �'I uj MATERIAL OP EQUAL, EXTENDING FROM SUBGRAOE TO FINISHED GF?AUE ^ 'T _ -- �. 4. SEE DWG. N0. CS- 300 AND N0. CS-30,.j 7 � z G SECTION A � w 0 -- --- 3 COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY DETAIL Q IZw 3 r 1 =; 1 c tz T. N WHO 3' - 5" C ' U > w 20 BARE I/2"N 2"5Q.EDGE rl1 AT BARS4 cc 0 Q-� t•- %2"x 2" 5Q.EDGE FLAT BAR r C a � U) O I / i DRAiIJA 3E BLOCKOUT Z U I_ Z- TR 1 " FACE OF :URB I 31" I.D. PLASTIC Q STrAK'� - I I M _ ----�1 P1 PE W/COUPLING W 14) STREET w1UTH 1 W W Z 6 cc � 5 0 C!)If � 7 co z 4 L < z �UL JUL C� - qu _ il-z 1 IIII W IL = -- — - _ I" BBATTER , v IIII=11h-. - Iy J U)- 1111 W_ n 2�L' 5�g"x 3" BOLT-2 EA. END j ,---- ~ cr Q Q r _ 20 DA/R5- 0. ROAD ROAD 1Ia " I' R uq= GR ATG FRAM — — —� �_T IPI�III U W 3 E 0 a 4 i:11 NI 0 !!! _ M CATCH BASIN DETAILS 4 4 04� — A —1111 N.T. S IIII=_—� o w� 11i1a IIII BASE COURSE IIII pn s 24" -- ' EASEMENT AREAS I TRAVELED RIGHTS OF W4Y - I I I/Z• AC 0Vr_F.1_ls r _ I %" T1eE1,1GH r^ r-H NATIVE 1. CONCRETE TO HAVE A BREAKING STRENGTH OF 3000 PS.I. AFTER 28 DAYS . MATERIALS__� �'�+ I IY1- 0" CRUSHED MOCK, CLEAN DENSE , HARD AND COMPACTED 2. EXPANSION• JOINTS 21 - 10 1 A. TO BE PROVIDED : DAI E 1) AT EACH POINT OF TANGENCY of THE CURB OCT. 23, I9&7 TkIENCH WIDTH 21 AT EACH COLD JOINT . -- _ 3) ON EACH SIDE OF INLETS . —� DRAWN BY: 4) AT EACH END OF DRIVEWAYS . ��. A . S) AT LOCATIONS NECESSARY TO LIMIT SPACING TO 45 FEET . CHECKED BY, w - B. MATERIAL TO BE PRE-MOLDED NON-EXTRUDING MATERIAL WITH A MINIMUM THICKNESS OF I/2 INCH , SFLECT GRANULAR MATERAL 3, CONTRACTION JOINTS REVISIONS' A. SPACING TO BE NOT MORE THAN 15 FEET . IN PIPE ZONE 9596 COMPACTION A. THE DEPTH OF THE JOINT SHALL BE AT LEAST 1 %2 INCHES . I -- 4. BASE ROCK - 1 1/2" MINUS , 95 "/o COMPACTION . BASE ROCK SHALL BE TO • i - 6" SUBGRADE OF STREET STRUCTURE OR 4" IN DEPTH , WHICHEVER IS GREATER f 5 DRAINAGE BLOCKCUT - 3"DIAMETER PLASTIC PIPE A. I D PLASTIC PIPE WITH COUPLING ~ - PIPE B DRAINAGE ACCESS THROUGH EXISTING CURBS SP 'd ACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATEDALL BE CORE DRILLED OR CURB Q SAW CUT VERTICALLY 18" EACH SIDE OF ACCESS AND REPOURED TO FULL DEPTH OF CURB. 987 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED • ZONE — C. DRAINAGiHEff DRAMIN3f ARE Y11111141PROF.E BLOCKOUTS SHALL NOT BE PROVIDED UNLESS NEEDED IFIF Tr or MACK[Ntl[ >w� rI D/2 • IN D ARE INCT TO o Y[D rru • ' AND ARE NOT TO •E R[ f' / . 1 Printed f O[oIN CI. MANNE:R,[RC[PT • • e WITH THE •RITYEN r•[RWI`-r 4" MIN or D/4 L SHEET - -��- 4 STD. CURB $ GUTTER DETAIL DEA 04 s1l r1.T. -,: MACKENZIE MINUMINO I �rw~n�tNrl�►� TRENCH DEI-AIL t T c OF 3 T. DPN. PERMIT NO. 274--67 rnr. JOB Nog 2g�600 •..;1a`�....—^'A+�tr.......+o,.n•r�.,. 'Plitt- 1 111 1 1 t 11 11 11! 1 1 I I') 1 1 �I 1 *I 1 III I +rw�jll1 .- 1I I III I I I I III I I I I I 1 I j l l 1'� I I i , I I I ( ISI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IIII I I t I I I I 1 (It��l)Illr► ! - ( 5 10 I I NOTE: 1 F TH i5 MICROFILMED 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 12� DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTIU; IT IS DUE TO JHE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAI. DRAWING, pE gZ gZ LZ 92 S2 ►Z Et ZZ Iz 0? tat 81 LI 91 SI t►I EI Z1 II 01 g 9 L 9 S 111, E 2— 1"•�"' �Ir1u111unlunlulllulllJru6n11►rrl�ulrlrlurinr�luuluul��lauln>;��,ului11rr1r1u11111ulllulllnlm111n111nIInn11111hIn1�,,,�111�Itsnlslnllu1111uInu�nultulllu111ntlunlw�It►ullurlrnllurrlrullunluullw�l�i>t�llt�tLtu�ull�Iullltlllltt�t:!IIIm, MARCH 30 1992 LuCATIO GREENGURG @ LOCUST fiJnPiE L.v.S.-Cr'IST+LiNC. IV Laraaaaxs_ ar.ssaas.s==_r:====s_�__z::� -sax-s 'TEF 1 • FT From Minor Strr_ei / V9 +J14 ..aaa aaaasaasax--rias---------a-aaa-a --axmat-----_a ILO._aa=------------- Conflicting ------a ---icConflicting Flown, Ve It 132 V3+V7=Vc9 1 132 V6+VS-Vc12 e 1 23+ 236= :ss vph 1 6+ 265- 273 vph Crrti(.al Gap, Tc iTab.10.2 ) 1 5 (aecs. ) 1 5 ( eecs. ) Foiential Capacity,Cp(Figl0.3 )1 Cp9 - 924 pcph 1 Cp12 - 911 pcph ): of CP utilized i (V9iCp9)xi0vO= 5.4). { (V12iCp12 )r,10©- 3.3k Impedance Factor, f (Fig. lfl.5 )1 P9- .97 ' F12- .96 Actual Capacity, Cm 1 Cm9-Cp9= 9__4 pcph 1 Cml2-Cpl2- 911 pcph STEP 2 • LT From Major streetaLx=z_rxv- - V4zx ----- VI s..------aa-aaas=..xr.. =_cz:ssr-.-==s�iaz>_xsax--�. Conflicting Flown, V(, 1 V3+V -Vcd -' zx =y==xT1 V6+V5-Vc1Ly===== 45+ 471- 516 vph 1 15+ 529- 544 vph Critical Gap, Tc (Tab.10.2 ) 1 5 ( secs. ) ' 5 ( aece. ) Fotential Cap8city,Cp(Figl0.3)1 Cp4 - 693 pcph i Cpl - 67S pcph fi of Cp utilized { (V4iCp4 )xl00- 6.7% 1 (V1iCp1 )x100- 1 .S% Impedance Factor , P (Fig. 10.5 )1 F4- .96 1 Pl- .99 Actual Capacity, Cm 1 Cm4=Cp4= 697 pcph 1 Cmi-Cpl- 675 pcph .............as........... STEP 3 TH From Minor Street V6 sagas=c=-.a.a=xsz=xe-rxx.s=L--r.==c=xsszax=ac C ----------- onflzctinra flows, Vc1 .SV3+V2+V1+V6+VS+V4-Vc6ix5V6+VS+V4+V3+V2+Vi-Vcli 1 23+ 471+ 10+ 15+ 1 6+ 529+ 4S+ 45+ 1 529+ 45- 1093 vph 1 471+ 10- 1106 vph Critical Gap, Tc ( Tab. 10.2 ) i 6 (secs. ) 1 6 ( secs. ) Potential Capacity,Cp(Fig10.3 )1 Cp6 - 236 pcph 1 Cpll - 233 Fcph % of CP uiilizcd i (V6iCpd )xloo- 2.5% 1 (Vll Cp11 )x100- 2. 1% Impedance Factor, F (Fig.10.5 )1 F6- .99 1 Fil- .99 ALiU81 Capacity, Cm i Cm6-Cp6xPIxF4 1 Cm11-CGIixPir.F4 i 226- 2369.99x.96pcph i 221- 233x,.99x.96pcph aaa a.sz=araraLs��asssLssa_ssa---=Lsassaaasx_x_.ra =a. -s- STEF 4 LT From Minor Street ' <-\ Vi _- a ===La=_-= Laa-ansa:-aartaaat-----Lar_---a------------ Conflicting Flows, Vc 1 Vc6( 5tep3 )+Vil+V12=Vc71 Vcll( 5tep3 )+V6+V9-VclikI+ 1093+ S+ 30- 1126vph 1 1106+ 6+ SO- 1164vph Critical Gap, Te (Tab. 10.2 ) 1 6.5 ( secs. ) { 6.5 Foteotial Capacity,Cp(Figi0.3 ) i Cpl - 192 pcph { Cp110 - 161 pcph Ac+uai Capacity, Cm { Cm7-Cp7xFlxF4xPlIxFl7 1 Cm10-Cp10..P4xF1xF6xF9 { - 192x.99x.96x..99x.96 1 161x .96x.99x.99x.97 { - 177 pcph { t 165 pcph aasaaaaaasatta tag aaatara•saaraaararaa::,casr.aasaa_mssss r.s-=axe---------- sem.-�aeR OC6T1ON GREENGURG 0 LOCUST NAME,L..O.S.-EXIST+LINC. IV SHARED LANE CAPACITY APPROACH MOVEMENTS 7,6,9 OR CR LOS LOS MOVEMENT Vi FCFH) CMi FCFH ) CSH(FCFH ) l CP1-V ) (CS ) cl-I CSH _ ------- 105 i77 x`=" 6 6 `` E 694 t;o 636 C A 9 50 51-4 694 674 636 A A APPROACH MOVEMENTS 10,11 ,12 MOVEMENT V FCf 1; OR OR l_OS LOS CM(FCFH ) CSW FCFH) SCM-V) CSH-V ) CM CSH 10 12 16S 311 145 �S6 - p C S 221 311 216 -'O 911 �S6 C C i2 311 661 2S6 r C MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS 1 ,4 MOVEMENT V;FCFH ) CM\PCFH) OR(CM-V ) ............. io 675 665 47 697 650 h COMMENTS• l Oft% .7 NASHI NGT'ON COUNV 1 Inter-Department Correspondence Date Mav 18, 15187 To Paula Calvin, ransportation Planning Coordinator• From Vary' Steffan. Traffic Analyst Subject FOUR LINCOLN CENTER - REVIEW COMMENTS FOR CITY OF TIGARU I have reviewed the traffic analysis and site plan for this development and have the following romments and recommendations. TRIP GENERATION County policy is to adhere to ITE recommended rates and procedures ur.less evidence is supplied to ,justify alternate rates and procedures. The estimated trip generation deviates from ITE procedures resulting in an underestimation of expected trip generation and impact resulting from this development. Trip generation as calculated utilized ITE use code 710; General Office. resulting in an estimated 3,419 vpd average daily trips and 378 vph PM exiling trips, based on a factor of 1 .36 exiting trips per ksf. Assuming that code 710 Is appropriate, the factor should be adjusted to reflect actual percentage of the total PM trips; ( (1 .36)/(1 .36)+ (0.27) )*(2.20) = 1 .84, @278 ksf - 510 vph PM exiting trips. However, ITB recommends estimating average daily trips using the curve given In Figure 1 in the 700 section of the manual and the peaking characteristics from the appropriate use code or table. The calculated daily trip rate (12.30 trips per ksf) appears reasonably close to a rate obtained via Figure 1 . However, the PM exit peaking characteristics for a building size over 200 ksf is 16.5% of the daily trips, or 564 vph. STACKING ANALYSIS County policy is to utilize a peaking factor of 2 and vehicle lengths of 25 feet, nationally recognized standards, unless evidence is supplied to ,justify an alternate factor or length. The calculated lengths utilized a peaking factor of 1 .5 and vehicle lengths of 20 feet. FOUR NCOLN CENTER - REVIEh COMMENTS t CITY Of- TIGARD Page 2 of 2 RECOMMENDATIONS It is uncertain what, if' any, the effect of using the revised trip generation rates and factors In the stacking analysis would have on the impact analysis. However, due to this uncertainty, I recommend the applicant analyze the impacts of this development considering the above discussion. Specific concerns include: 1 . The Greenhurg/Mapleleaf intersection. As the 1985 HCM recommends, a composite LOS of the intersection as a whole is not in itself an adequate measure of the intersections performance. Lane group v/c ratios that naar 1 .00 should be -considered a condition requiring mitigation. Considering pro.iected volumes are being utilized, v/c ratios greater than 0.951 are critical. 2. Stacking lengths should be checked to insure stacking does not interfere with operations at the Greenburg/Mapleleaf and Greenburg/Locust intersections. c: Ron Weinman, Washington County Randy Woolley, City of Tigard I /t= 7n l4r /yd2a C73•j Gn► Z7Lz� oel 7/3 C"��,,. ��. D v 611 Zct,0049 asF/ rte?/c u l«k420)'? ©� ��7 /c� ,E /�,r l oz GgL7 ve4u6t .1 /e-I.-IT 'fY ✓�"� �C.�/H.ao�� [ Qu�P.^ (�1�C �7J L�'i",_`'c; �l c,;�, �i c..� Gam!/'/�°...f� 5 ewt, � V ✓ art(cu 46'-Z a vele 271 ,317 '7/2 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCOqPORATED LFTUFFI-9 0FQr�� u MACKENZIE/SAITO &A% )CIATES, P C. 0690 SW BANCROFT STREET PORTLAND,OREGON 97201 (503)224 9560 (503)224 9570 Date: April 24 , 1987 Project Number 286500 To: Tranmell Crow Company P.O. Box 5396 Portland, OR 97228 Attention: Jim Eddy c� Project Name: four Lincoln Center _ Please find attached: _ _ shop drawings plans samples specifications / copy of letter __. change order �4 r r L details ✓ / calculations Number of copies: Description: _X_ For your use 2C_ For your review For approval As requested REMARKS: Copy to. Randy Clarno, Paula Calvin, F,on Fai.lmetzer, Lee Gunderson each o ak�ove wI copy Traffic na ysJ_sT---- -- Signed: LAMS STOUT/as X Mailed Delivered _- To be picked up n enUwua ue nor as noted. krndty now-,us of ORCN. I a -------- i ._ ' -- J \� J TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PHASE IV LINCOLN CENTER FOR TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY I I Date of Completion April 16, 1987 C ; NF `t r� Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated 010505�9 0690 S.W. Bancroft Street r Portland, Oregon 91201 Project Number 286500 INDEX I . INTRODUCTION II. EXISTING CONDITIONS III . TRIP GENERATION IV. TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT V. INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS VI . SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS VII . GAP ANALYSIS VIII. VEHICLE STkIKING ANALYSIS IX. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS X. APPENDIX 1 . INTRODUCTION Phase IV of Lincoln Center will be located south of the existing L.inccln II office building. The site includes frontage on S.W. Locust, S.W. Oak, and S.W. 93rd and S.W. Greenburg Road. Phase IV wi11 consist of a multi-story office structure containing 180,000 gross square feet of leasable off4ce space plus an additional 8,000 gross square feet of retail space. Driveway access is proposed onto S.W. Oak and S.W. Locust, with no access to S.W. 03rd. The following traffic analysis will review existing traffic volumes and conditions, in conformance with Washington County and ODOT traffic study requirements, and will recommend access configuration and controls based upon projected volumes contributed by the proposed development. II . EXISTING CONDITIONS S.W. Greenburg Road is designated a minor arterial. Existing lane configurations for Greenburg Road and other affected streets are presented in Figure 1. A traffic count was taken on March 31, 1987, at the intersection of Greenburq Road and Mapleleaf. The count was taken Curing the PM peak hour of Greenburg Road, 4: 30 - 5i30 p.m. Based upon these volumes, the resulting level of service is "C" for this intersection. Volimes for other intersections in the vicinity are based upon figures presented in the "Ash Creek Property Traffic Study" prepared by Professional Solutions Inc. The Ash Creek property is located south of Oak Street between 95th Avenue and Ball Boulevard. Figu^e 2 indicates existing PM peak hour traffic volumes. These are compiled from traffic data taken from the 1986 Washington County Peak Hour Counts map, Oregon Department of Transportation traffic counts, counts by Robert Keech and Associates, PSI , and Mackenzie Enqineering Inc. Areal growth rates were evaluated using the Metzger-Progress Circulation Study and applied to the older traffic counts. Adjustments are made to these existing volumes to account for " in process" traffic. This is traffic expected in the area due to other projects in the near vicinity (refer to Ash Creek Traffic Study) . An additional adjustment is made to account for the projected volumes for Phase I of the Ash Creek Development. The resulting additional volume due to these two adjustments is presented in Figure 3. A final "Revised Existing Volume" is shown in Figure 4. This is based upon the summation of volumes shown on Figures 2 and 3. It should be noted that during 1986, the Greenburg at Mapleleaf signal was converted from 3 phase (Washington Square and Mapleleaf on a common phase) to 4 phase. This eliminated the conflicts created by the weaving that occurred just south of this intersection, with vehicles establishing lane position for the freeway interchange. H ALL r W Z Z Q — Au d ,y z � V) d oIT- ') w � 3 ..- .� V) `--sir � w.► I � (ARE ENPW R6 RD. 3 ✓ r FIGURE 1 BY, QPQ ------- _�A X57 ANG -A.NFS _ DATE APAII_198-1 l MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED JOB NOr� 0690 S W BANCROFT STREET PORTLAND OREGON 97201(503 ,e24-9560 SHT __ OF�____ NI l H Lj _ 30 0 t 1 ALL 31-VE). � o—� 410 m � � v U- V) Q � d O Z Z W IL N N � Y- � � A x a Q u�r W LL -) Q � y5 TH �r0 n w a vi < N J1 7 J } s� y v � O a. y V4 � � Q L I - � A5 qO -- Z � 49556I2J9 �W o 310 I BY OLUM4-5 DATE MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED JOB NO -26X 5500 L I 0690 S W BANCROFT STREET PORTLAND OREGON 97201(503)224.95M SHT ._,. OF __ 11 u W HALL BLVD. -7 zo —� 1 d W 0 LU �[ H �. 0 z W W .Y-- J 3 ri w 4 � W �L "C�o i 2i 0 4 35 z-7 1 T t- 23 2.15 23 w 3 _FXA J._E 3 RV GPC " INL PROCE5511+ P1-{P5F, _ _ A5H LREEr, ;A1F APRIL i°Ig1 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED R Ni, ze�(y50U 069('S W BANCROFT STREET PORTLAND.OREGON 97201 15031 220.9560 SHT ___OF 30 10 32$� NAIL BLVD. 91 430 —. rn J � Z I Z: �s TH Q I IL. W UU �1 N N 45 5 Io t L .- q io5 L. 115 s— SoZ. -2a5, .+-- 4to4 5Z4c—__j♦•� (*4 3 4 _ 3 r z _Z I I d 3 REXSFY_ EM5 1_I_N16 YQ_LUM ..5- oaTE A.L r�lL —Mg -U 11MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED JOB NO 0690 S W BANCROFT STREET PORTLANL OREGON 97201(503)221.9580 SHT _OF �__ r r IIII. TRIP GENERATION The following estimated trip generation isbased upon the ITE ( Institute of Transportation Engineers) Trip Generation Manual - Third Edition (1984). A. Site Development - Lincoln IV i 1. 188,000 square foot gross leasable space a. 180,000 office space h. 8,000 tenant service related retail B. Vacant Office Space - Lincoln I-III 1. 90,000 square foot gross leasable space (March 30, 1987) C. ITE Land Use Code #710 (General Office Building) 1. Total Daily Trip Rate 12. 30/.1,000 GLSF 2. Total Daily Trips 12. 3 x 278 KSF - 3,419 VPH 3. P.M. Peak Trips: Enter .27/1,000 = 75 VPH (Based upon peak hour of adjacent street) Exit 1. 36/1,000 = 378 VPH 1 i i l IV. TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT A trip distribution scenario has been established for the project based upon assumptions utilized in the Greenburg-Locust-Oak Commercial District Traffic Analysis dated July 1981 by Mackenzie Engineering Inc. This distribution indicates trip origins and destinations for this area to be as follows: 80% south via Greenburg Road 5% east via Oak 5% east via Locust 10% north via Greenburg Distribution of these percentages to specific driveways and streets is illustrated in Figure 5. Trip assignment is presented in Figure 6. This is based ipon volumes generated in Section III of this report and distributed in accordance with Figure 5. It should be noted that no access points are proposed along the site's east boundary (future Lincoln Street). 'o M HALL 5-VD. - m o �n Ul — 1 11 z IL o m o L —t _� z DL d til J e N ._.�.. 9 S T" w IL 7n I-L CL � I Q .� _ . �_O a+--_-g •r---In Ifoo Q .J ♦--20 a.---h, 10 vtj tu Z Z 3 - .-- By .[1__Q RIF D15TRI-5UT1�laL �/e DATE -AMI�.-_1��_ MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED JOB NO �00` _ 0690 S W BANCROFT STREET PORTLAND.OREGON 97201 )503)2249580 SHT. _OF _ l 2 MALL BLVD. z > > �- ui ao V-Z Lt— � i I J Q La at 0 95TH �.. �- E-- w EL �7 �, 7 X LL j J L W J i Q N 15 ,0,,,.. -30 is 17 43oz� e ,oz r 3 3 --- — 41 F fCi U __]lei---� —— By _ L1iL_ ( `5v 16N 1_ ( 1 f lLf;)) DATE A_ML.Aj%T MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED JOB NO Zt(44500 51 0690 S W BANCROFT STREET PORTLAND.OREGON 97201 (503)224-9580 SHT OF L V. INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS The existing intersections associated with the project were reviewed for level of service on the basis of Special Report 209, Operations and Design Method. A level of service "D" or better is considered acceptable by Oregon Department of Transportation. (See Section VII for discussion of Level "E" movements. ) The computer calculations for this work appear in the Appendix of this report. LT-MINOR RT-MINOR _LT-MAJOR SIGNAL WARRANT A. Revised Existing Conditions Greenburg2/Locustl E3 C A N N Greenburg2/Map]eleafl ----------C---------- N/A Greenburg2/Oak 1s A* A A N N Greenburg2/Hwy 217 Northl ----------C---------- N/A Greenburg2/Hwy 217 Southl ----------C---------- N/A Hall2/Oak1 D C A N N Oak2/95thl A A A N N B. REVISED EXISTING Conditions & Lincoln IV Greenburg2/Locust1 E3 C A N N Greenburg2,'Mapleleafl ----------C---------- N/A Greenburg2/Oak1 A* A B N N Greenburg2/Hwy 217 Northl ----------D---------- N/A Greenburg2/Hwy 2.17 Southl ----------C---------- N/A Hall2/Oak1 D D A N N Oak2/95thl A A A N N 1. Cons Bred m nor street for purposes of this analysis 2. Considered major street for purposes of this analysis 3. See Gap Analysis Section * Illegal Movement 9N� 34 HALL k3LVb. 47 111 + kn ro�— � � 4- z z � W 1 ° OW _ En Z Z v 4 25 W �. J 95 rH D J J W LL 4 CL J J w � � rJ 8-7 E►3 4(00 4EA LL 1wittmF4eo 23 Ile I g-7 �?a —� (aq 3-----► V � 15 '�� 28.—� 17 8Z �—� z Z o N Z_ By -FT--I l5E0 Exlf-)-F 6 YOLUM5 DATE -AMI MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED JOB NO Z%40()-- - 0690 S W BANCROFT STREET PORTLAND,OREGON 97201)503)224-9560 SHT OF-, VI . SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS The intersections of Greenburg at Locust and Nall at Oak were ana'yzed for signal warrants 1 and 2. Signals are not warranted at these locations at the buildout of Lincoln IV. A signal will be required at Greenburg and Locust at the buildout of Phase II of the Ash Creek project. Refer to the appendix for signal warrants. I VII . GAP ANALYSIS Based on the findings for the intersection of Greenburg at Locust in Section VI , a gap study was undertaken to determine the effect of the nearby signal nn this intersection. As shown in the Appendix, 121 gaps of sufficient duration to accommodate left turns from Locust to Greenburg (7 seconds or greater) were observed. This compares to an Existing volume of 105 vehicles in the P.M. peak hour. It should be noted that while observing the available gaps, several left turns were completed during gaps of less than six seconds. It was also observed that the majority of gaps are of a duration in excess of 12 seconds, thus allowing multiple left turn movements. With the availability of the Mapleleaf at Greenburt signal for west to southbound traffic, none of the Lincoln Center generated southbound egressing traffic has been assigned to the Locust at Greenburq intersection. I VIII . VEHICLE STACKING ANALYSIS Observation of the Highway 217 overpass during P.M. peak hours reveals that progression between the north and south signals operates very efficiently, such that stacking is minimized at the bridge. Additionally, the P.M. peak trips destined for the project from south of Highway 2.17 number only 16. For the above reasons, the following lane stacking areas have been addressed: 1. Southbound on Greenburg, at the approach to the Highway 216 north signal: Outside through lane: 2.25' Inside through lane: 182' 2. Southbound on Greenburg, at the approach to the Mapleleaf signal: Outside through lane: 261' Inside through lane: 96' 3. Westbound on Mapleleaf, at the approach to the Mapleleaf/Greenburg signal : Outside lane: 171' Inside lane: 176' For the Mapleleaf stacking, the analysis assumed dual lanes will be provided, although at this time, only 150' is provided, followed by a landscape "turnaround" that stacks only 1 lane. The actual stacking at full buildout wi l l be roughly 300 feet, accounting for, the existing 5:00 p.m. peak traffic. The dual egress lanes should be provided in a straight alignment to allow for efficient e vehicle progression to the i Greenburg, g e s gnai at Refer to the stacking calculations in the Appendix. I IX. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Lincoln Center Phase IV project will not have significant impact; on the adjacent street system. The project continues to emphasize the Greenburg at Mapleleaf traffic signal as the main point of egress, which has been shown to operate at level "C" at full buildout. Stacking lengths are generally adequate, except for the Mapleleaf approach to Greenburg. This approach requires 2 relatively straight egress lanes of 250 to 300 feet of length. The traffic signal at Greenburg and Mapleleaf should continue to operate as a four phase, to avoid the confusion that has persisted prior to the 1986 renovation. Since the trips generated by Lincoln IV will be predominantly directed to the Greenburg at Mapleleaf signal, the proposed Lincoln 'treet extension is not required for this project. The continued direction of traffic to Greenburg is consistent with the Metzger-Progress Circulation Study, helping to meet the goal of reduced traffic accessing points east via Locust and Oak. Because of the heavy left turning volumes from Mapleleaf onto Greenburg, and the heavy right turns from Washington Square, it is suggested that removal of the south lPg crosswalk be considered. This will provide for a safer pedestrian condition, and will enhance the intersection capacity. The project's Oak Street frontage should be improved, with right of way dedication, to provide an adequate facility for the project's traffic. Future improvements are planned by the Ash Creek Development and possible L.I .D. project. I APPENDIX - LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATIONS - STORAGE LENGTH ANALYSIS - SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS - GAP STUDY i I I Level of Service Calculations for REVISED EXISTING i ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- INPUT WORKSHEET ; Intersection:GREENBURG AT MAPLELEAF Date;APRIL 1987 ;Analyst DPO/MEI TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK HOURArea Type: CED xOther ; :Project No.28GS00 City/State TIGARD,OR (REV.EXISTING ) , azs-=xxmxaexxsasxxxsaaazczazxxaz-aaz=xzfffafafffaxmaxaaaaaxmaxrxss..xac.szo-- , '.IOLUME 11ND GEOMETRICS ; GREENBURG N. S ';T , [ 6901 ! S9 TOTAL ; 1 1 1 ! ; ! I I 12 .0 I [ 3591 l ! ! < v 12.0 1 -WB TOTAL; (N ) 28 643 191 RTH TH LT 1 317 v ------------------ ----------------- NORTH ---------------•-- NORTH v v ;v--LTH-12.0'-1 v---LT-12.01 -1 I : IDENTIFY IN DIAGRAM 2-12.0'-RT---v I1.Volumes ---------•-------- < •--------1 12.Lanes, lane widths ; LT LTH RTH : MAPLELEAF 1 :3.Mo-ements by ane 34 1 12.0 1 12.0; E/W STREET 14.Parking locations - ; ; 12.0 ! ! 46S ;G.Bay storge ingths [ S341 - 9 ; 1 1 1 ; 502 72 t ,6. Island5 r-.'B TOTAL - 110391 ;7.Bus stops v 49l N/B TOTAL ; TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS cneas s.a xssaxxeaxaxaassxzzax=czsss==ax=x=zsaazo=e¢=x zazxaxxx.=a..aaaaamazzzsxa; :Ap:Grd. l HV Ad,1 .Pkg.Lane 1 B"ses PHF ;Cnf .Ped: Ped_rn Buttonl Arr, ! Ipr : ( 7. ) 1 ; Y/N : Nm 1 lib : ( pd/hr ) ; Y/N !Mn.Time: Typel IEB1 +0.0! 2.0 ; N ; 0 0 0. 90 10 ; Y ; 19 1W9: +0.01 2.0 ; N 0 0 0.90 10 ! Y I 19 ! 3 ; 1NB: +0.01 2.0 ; N 0 0 0.90 10 ; Y 1 19 : 3 ISB: +0.0: 2.0 I N ; 0 0 0. 90 ! 10 1 Y 1 19 ! 3 ; ; ---------------------------------- - ------- ;Grade +up,-down Nb!buses stopping/hr Min.Timing min.green for IHU vel.. 4 whls PHF pear-hour factor pedestrian :rr,ssing INm p� g.maneuvers/hr Cnf.Peds Cnflctng peds/hr Arr-. Type Type 1-S ,ssosm:z=_acs=aancxs=-=--xxza_x=asaaafsasaz aaxxaasaasax-..,s=zsssaxca-a=x=.c=�= , !PHASING aamaaax.zzzzo.z.�=z�asa�ssasazas=ezxzaaaaxxxms-=�-xz�axcxxx.�xacxxa=no-.-.xv�cc , 1 D • 1 ! + ! I I I I 1 1 A 1 v + 1 1 I ! G 1 1 v I I I 1 R ! I I 1 « 1 I I I ! M ; 1000 1 I • ! ! ! ! 1 1 v ! 1 ------ ---------; --------I--------1--------i --------; -------- 1 -------- --------1 I I !Tim- : Gm 27.6: G- 30.8! G- 16.11 Ga 3.S: Ga 0.01 G= 0.0; G- 0.01 G- 0.01 1 ing ;Y+R- 3:Y+R- 3!Y+R- 3!Y+R- 3; `/+R- 31Y+R- 3:Y+R- 3!Y+R- 3; !Ptmd/Act ; A l A l A l A I ! 1 ---------------------------------------------•------ ----------- I Protected turns; «•«•" 000o" ; Permitted turns: +++'-" ; Cyr, le Length 90 Sec: 1 --------------------------------- -------------._--------- --- - - ----- ---------- I MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI 1 ------------ - ------------------------------------- : Intersection GREENBURG AT MAPLELEAF Date;APRIL 1987 !Analyst DPO/MEI TimePeririd Anlyzd:PM PEAK HOURArea Type 080 XOtherl ;Project No.286S00 City/State TIGARD,OR (REV.EXISTING) ; =s:aascsxsacs==s-cxscasnmcsas=sss.ea=sasaosas=zssss=�=mamxasaszs:c-asxsxss_=n =a � ! (.'OLUME AD.fu-,TMENT WORN 1HEET - _ __!!__x=sc=aa_a_.r__.__-zaaasassc:=ssaa_sa=snsaasnmss.=c=_s=acosas_sx=asasc= 1 1 3 4 ! 5 6 7 ; 8 1 9 1 10 1 11 ;Aper. f1vt . ; Mvt . 1 Feak I Flow Lane IFIw rt !Numberl Lane I Adj . ! Prop. ; 1 :Volume! Hour 1 Rate ;Group ! in Ln I of :Utiliz! Flow 1 of I ! ( vph) :�actorl Vp 1 !Grp Vg!Lanes :Fctr,U1 V,vphl LT or RTI I ! F:4F 1 3/4 ! 1 (vph ) 1 N ITb 9-41 7 x 91P1t , Prt ! , c__sssssaalsssasstssasaalasssaal :sxsaslrsasnalaaaaaalzxzzsaixaassxisaaxassss LT ! 341 0.90 1 38; I 1 ! 0.79 LT rB rH 9; 0.90 101 C ! 481 1 1 .00 48; RT 1 491 ! 0.90 ! 5461 0 1 S461 2 ; 1 .05 ; 57.11 1.00 RT 1 LT ! 3171 0.90 ; 3s2 ! ! 1 l ; ! 0.88 LT ! wB TH 22; 0.90 1 241 I 1 398! 2 ! 1 .05 ! 4181 * ! RT 20! 0.90 ! 221 ! l ! I 1 0.06 RT 1 LT ; 5021 0.90 1 S58! ! 1 1 1 1 0,48 LT ! 1 NB TH 4651 0.90 1 517! G ! 11551 3 1 1 . 10 1 12711 0 ! RT 721 0.90 1 801 ! 1 ! 1 ! 0.07 RT -----'------' ------' ------' ------' ------'------I------1 -- LT ; 19! 0.90 ! 21 ; A ! 211 1 ! 1 .00 ! 21 ; 1 .00 LT 1 SB TH 6431 0.90 ! 714! N 1 7d5! n1 1 .05 I 782! ; ; RT ! 28: 0.90 ! 31 ; ; ; ; ! 1 0.04 RT 1 -------- ------------ --------------------------' !LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[ •»• - PROTCTO, +++ = PERMTTD, 44# = PROTCTO & PERMTTOII 1------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 1 A 1 C 1 G I I 1 N 0 ; 1 1 1 • I + ! ! ! ! 4#4 1 0 0 ; •a > ! •Mrs►} ! •••s) ! •�11• ! ---------------------_-.__--_-.-.--_-_-__.--_---_-_----___-.- I MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI ------------------------------------------------------------------ L ---------------------------------------------------- 1Intersection GREENBURG AT MAPLVELEAF Date;APRIL 1987 ' :Analyst :DPO/MEI TimePeriod Anlyzd;PM PERK HOURArea Type CBD XOther ; 1Project No.286500 City/State TIGARO,OR (REU.EXISTING ) 1 ; xzxaaaaaczaa:a::asaaazzzaasaxxzaaaaasaaxaazaasaaaaxa:aeaaaxaaaaaaaxsaamsaa=a; SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET 1 a a i i a 9 a a x i a a a a a a a a a a LANE 1 3 1 4 1 5 ; 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 ; 1012 ; 13 GROUP; Ideal ;Nu. ;Ln.W. 1HvyVehlGrade 1 P1.g. IBusBlklAreatp;Rt Trn;Lt Trn;AdjSat -----1 Sat . 1of ; Fw 1 Fhv 1 Fg ; .=p ; Fbb 1 Fa 1 Frt 1 Flt 1F1wRt 1 12; Flow ;Lns;------1------1------1 ------1------I ------ ' ---' I --- I ------1 S AplMvlpcphgpl N 1T.9-S 1T.9-6 1T.9-7 IT.9-8 1T.9-9 1T.9-101T.9-111T.9-121 ( vph(g) aa;aa;assaaa;aaz;aaxzaz;asxaazlasaaaz;aasaaz;aaaaaz; aaaaza;aaaaaa;x:.saar; aaaxaz EBI C1 1800 ; i ; 1 .0001 0.9901 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 0.9621 1714 I Q1 1800 1 ; 1 .0001 0.490; 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 0.7S0' 1 .000; 2673 1 ------1 --`---1 ----".- 1 ' I I W8. I ; 1800 ; 2 f 1 .0001 0. 9901 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 0.991 ; 0.91101 3."S1 1 1 1 I 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 { I l NB1 G1 1800 1 3 1 1 .0001 0.990; 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 0.9891 0.9761 5164 1 Al 1800 1 1 1 1.0001 0,990; 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 0.9501 1693 SSE ! NI 1800 1 2 1 1 .0001 0.9901 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 0.9941 1 .0001 3541 I 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[ •A• = PROTCTD, +++ - PERMTTD, ### - PROTCTD S PERMTTDII I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 A 1 C I G l I 1 N Q ; I 1 AAAA 1 AAAI` ; NAAA ; AAAA) I NiIAAi ; AANA 1 I I I I 1 + 1 + I + I v ; v 1 v 1 v l 1---------------------------------------------------------------------•------- I MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ I e 4 --- ._ ---------------------------------------------------------------- lintersection:GREEN©URG AT MAPLELEAF Date:APRIL 1987 ;Analyst :DPO/MEI TiMePeriod Anlyzd;PM PEAK HOURArea Type CBD XOther ' IPro,lect No.286500 City/State: TTGARD,OR (REV.EXISTING ) I laaaaa=sannazzazssz z.arms=soaaza¢sssszzaaaasa=sa_==mz_-___.._.-za=__z_=_ I CAPACIT'e ANALYSIS WORN HEET 1 ' .r.z.00sass=:za�=sass_sv=�=anz-zooaaasal ;LANE GROUP I 3 4 ; 5 ; 6 I 7 g ! -----1 Adjusted ;Ad.Sat ; Flow Ratio ; Green ;Ln.Grp ; v/C ICrit . l 1 I 2 I Flow Rate 1F1w.Rt1 1 Ratio ICapec. ' Ratio I 7 !Appr. lMvMt . ; v ; s I vis ; g C lc,vph I X !Lane 1 1 1 ; ( vph ) ; ! „phg ) ; -714 ; I 4.K63/7 !Group : I Izaaaalarasa�:aaa:as=asa; ====_� ' ---zx_�-=•-_--xmias�a=vm' aaasa= � --- _ ' _ I I ' 1 EB i; 49 - 1-14 ; 0,018 0.0.39 I 67 0."19 I •«r 1 0 573 - 2673 1 0.214 - 0.381 1 1018 10.563 1 - 1 i -----' - --- I 1 , - I ------•------ ------I-----------------' 1 1 W8 I 1 418 - 13251 ; 0. 129 - ; 0. 179 ; 581 0.719 •r* I I ! 1-----; -----;-----------'------' I NS 1 G ; 1271 - 15164 ; 0.246 - 1 0.342 1767 ; 0.719 ; •«« 1 1 1 1 f I--'--I ---_-•' -----------' ------ ' 1 I 1 A ; 2?, - 1 1693 ; 0.012 - ; 0.307 1 520 ; 0.040 1 - I 1 SB I N ; 782 - 3541 ; 0.1"21 - ; 0.307 ; 1087 ; 0.719 1 ««« 1 1 I --------------------------------------------------------- _ ;Cycle Length- 90.Osec, Lost TimeiCycle,L- 12.0sec, S( v/s )ci- 0.624, Xc=0.7191 I -------------------------------------------------------------------------------' ;LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-( *** - PROTCTD, +++ - PERMTTD, tits = PROTCTO & PERMTTDI { I --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ' ! A I C I G ^ l I ^ I N 1 Q 1 1 « 1 + 1 « 1 + I I 1 1 { «rrr I rrrr; rrrrj 1 rrrr) I rrrr; 1 «rrr 1 1 ! { ; + f + f + I • { f 1 v i v 1 v I v 1 I------------------------------------------------------------•----- - { MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI - -! ----------------------------------------------------------. . . - --------------------------------------------------------------------------.------ : Intersection.GkEENBURG AT MAPLELEAF Date-APRIL 1987 1 :Analyst ;DPO/MEI T1mePeriod Anlyzd;PM PEAK HOURArea Type; CBD XOther: !Project No.286500 City/State;TIGARD,OR (REV.EXISTING) I ; ansa=..asnouns==.a..=s..asssasoasss.s..saa.oars.��asraa.aa a.=sas.s.as.s..sss; I LEVEL-OF-SERVICE_WORKSHEET I First Term Delay : Second Term Delay_ : Tot .Delay_8_LOS LANE 1 3 : 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 1 10 1 111 12 1 13 GROUP: „/c I Green: Cyclel Delay I Lane: Delay :Prgrsn:Lane Gp: Ln: Apprch!Apr -----I Ratio! Ratio:Length! dl !Groupl d2 !Factor! Delay 1 GpI Delay ILOS 1 121 X 1 g/r I C Iaec/vehlCap,clsec/vehl PF ! sec/veh:LOS: sec/veh: Tbl Ap!Mv1 1 1 ( sec ) l : ( vph ): IT.9-13I (G+8 )*9!9--11 : 9-1 ss� aa;.assns;==sa.=;sass..;ss.s.s.ja.eau;..s=s==l...r==Isasaa..js=.;a:nas=aiaas r 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I r r 1 1 I 1 1 I I r E81 C: 0.719: 0.039: 90.01 32.50: 67: 19.77: 0.85 1 44.43: E 1 16.94: C 1 01 0.563: 0.381 ! 90.01 16.681 1018: 0.55: 0.85 1 14.641 B 1 : WB! I : 0.719: 0. 179: 90.0: 26.471 581 , 2.991 0.85 1 25.041 D 1 25.04: D 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 NBI GI 0.7191 0.3421 90.01 19.64: 1767: 1 .02 : 0.85 1 17.56: C I 17.561 C I I I I I I 1 I I I I I -- 1: --1 ------I------I------I-------1 -----1-------1------'-------'---' ' 1 1 ------- --- I I A! 0.040: 0.3071 90.0: 16.631 5201 0.001 1 .00 1 16.631 C I I SB: N: 0.7191 0.307: 90.01 21 .08: 1087: 1 .64: 0.85 1 19.31 : C 1 19.241 C I I I I I I I I I I I I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Intersection Delay 18.87 sec/veh, Intersection LOS C Table 9. 1 1 ----------------------------------------------------------- !LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[*** PROTCTD, +++ = PERMTTD, 1t** a PROTCTD b PERMTTO11 I----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 A 1 C : G ' I I 1 N 1 9 1 I I • ! * : * I + ! I I + I + ! + ! • ; I I ! : v I v ! v 1-------------.--------------------------------.------- -------------------------! : MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI I -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- . � S -- -- ------------------------------------------------- INPUT WORKSHEET i IIntersection:GREENBURG 0 HWY 217 SOUTH Oate:APRIL 1987 :Analyst :DPO/MEI TimePeriod Anlyzd PM PEAK HOURArea Type CBD KOther: (Project No.286500 City/State TIGARD, OR ( REVISED EXISTING ? .-s-a-__m____x-_em-c=__-vc=ax=_=vsacv=xm=aasaasmaaa=assasax==assszcsc= I sa=asass, !VOLUME AND GEUMFTRIC5 GREENBURG N/S ST. : ! [ 1061 ] I 0 .. I 1 58 TOTAL 1 1 i 12.0 ! 0 1 1 v ) 1 1 12.0 : -WB TOTAL! (N) 0 G04 457! TH LT 0 v ! III ----------------- : NORTH I i I I : IDENTIFY IN DIAGRAM ' 1 .Volumes --- -------- ----- :2.Lane3, lane widths TH RT 1 HWY '17 RAMPS 1 13.Movements by lane 407 ! 12.0 : ! E/W STREET ! 14.Parking locations - ! 1 12.01 464 1S.Bay storge ingths ( G15T 0 1 1 1 0 < 38 : IZEDL'c-TICN :6. Islands E/8 TOTAL �! : 15621 : FtrZ :7.Bus stops ��JS : N/B TOTAL RT02 !TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS 15'/c KEDUt-TION Fat RTOR ! 1ApIGrd. 1 % HV : Ad,1 .PFg.Lane Buses : PHF !Cnf.Ped: Pedstrn Button! Arr. ; 1 pr: (X ) 1 1 Y/N Nm ( Nb ) 1 (pd/hr ) 1 Y/N :Mn.Time: Type: 1EB! +2.0! 2.0 1 N 0 0 0.90 : 0 i N 1 0 1 3 1 IWB! +-0.0: 2.0 1 N 0 0 0.90 0 : N 1 0 i 5 i 1 PJ8 1 +2.0: 2.0 : N 1 0 0 0. 90 : 0 1 N 0 1 3 : ISBI-2.0: 2.0 1 N 1 0 0 0. 90 : 0 i N : 0 1 5 i I---------------------------------------------.---------------g------9---- IGrade: +up,-down Nb:buses stopping/hr Min.Timin min.green for !HV:veh. 4 whls PHF:peak-hour factor pedestrian crossing! INM:pkg.maneuvers/hr Cnf.Peds:Cnflctng peds/hr Arr.Type Type 1-5 isasvxsas=se=aeon=n==s__aazrses=es=e=xv=;o=es--xn==-==a=sex-=.=x-asmc===----____ i !PHASING - -- I I I I ♦M j ! • ! i I ! I 1 A i ! v ! G I : A I •••••il ! r•> 1 M i + I I • : ; ! i v ! ! • 1 ! ITim- 1 Ga 0.01 Ga O.Oi Ga 0.0: G- 0.0: G- 0.01 G= 0.01 G= 0.0. 1 Ga 0.0: I ing IY+R• 01Y+Rm OIY+R= O:Y+R= O:Y+R- O: YrR= O: Y+R- O:Y+R- 0! !Ptmd/Actl A I A I A l 1 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ' I Protected turns: ••••" 0000" ! Permitted turns : ++++^ I Cycle Length 90 Sec ! 1 I-----------------------------•---------- I MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ; Intersection:GREENBURG 0 HWY 217 SOUTH Date APRIL 1987 ' ;Analyst ;DPO/MEI TiMePeriod Anlyzd;PM PEAK HOURArea Type: CBD XOtherl :Project No.2-86500 City/State: TIGARD, OR (REVISED EXISTING) lxaaaaa:zazazszaazzaaaaaazzaaaazaazazaszaaaaaasstaaxzaaaaazaxzzaasaaaasaaz-anal VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET lazszzxaaaszzzzazzzzzzazzzzzxszaasaaazzaxzaaaz�zzaxzaaa:axaaszzszasaaaaaazaasa! 1 1 1 4 ; 5 I 6 1 7 ;Al)pr. 1 Mvt . 1 Mvt. ; Peak 1 Flow I Lane IFIw rt !NuMber; Lane 1 � � Adj . ! Prop. 1VoluMel ; Hour 1 Rate Group ! in Ln 1 of ;Utiliz ! Flow 1 of 1 1 ; 1 (vph) ;Factor! Vp 1 !Grp Vg!Lanes ;Fctr,U! V,vphl LT or RTI 1 ! ; 1 PHF 1 3/4 1 ; (vph ) 1 N 1Tb 9-4; 7 , 9;Plt , Prt ! Isxxialx:aa:�zzzzzzlsazzzz�zzzzzzlwaaaaalaxzazalasu aalaaaaaalaaaaaalzaazaazaal 1 I LT 1 4071 0. 90 1 4S2; A l 452-1 1 1 1 .00 I 4521 1 .00 LT 1 1 ES 1 rH 1 0; 0.90 ! 0; 1 I 1 RT 1 2-081 0.90 ; 2311 # 1 Q ; 2-31 ; 1 1 1 .00 ; 2311 1,00 RT ; I LT 1 0; 0.90 1 0; 1 I 1 1 1 0.00 LT 1 1 WB 1 rH ; 0; 0.90 ; 01 I I 1 I ; RT ; 0; 0.90 ; 0; 1 # ! ' 0.00 RT 1 1 1 LT 1 0! 0.90 ; 0; 1 ! --- ! 0.00 LT I 1 NB 1 TH 1 464; 0.90 1 5161 E 1 5161 1 1 1 .00 ! 516! # 1 -----I RT 1 98! 0.90 1 1091 Q 1 109! 1 1 1 .00 ! 1091 1 .00 RT 1 1 ---- 1 ------ ' 1 1 LT 1 4571 0.90 1 5081 A l 5081 2 1 1 .05 1 5331 1 .00 LT ; 1 SB I TH 1 6041 0.90 I 6711 E I 6711 1 ; 1 .00 I 6711 # 1 1 RT 1 01 0.90 1 01 ! I 1 1 1 0.00 RT 1 I ------------- ------------------------------------- 1LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[ ### - PROTCTO, +++ - PERMTTD, ### - PROTCTO b PERMTTDII I ----------------------------------- -------------------------------------- 1 A 1 E Q 1 ----1 i 1 ; ##AA ! ###Aj 1 4#A• 1 ! 1 ; 1 V ! 1 ------------------------- 1 -----MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI ----- -----------------------------------------------•------------� --------------------------------- 1Intersection:GREENBURG 0 HWY 217 SOUTH Oate:APRIL 1987 -- ' !Analyst :DPO/MEI TiMePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK HOURArea Type: CBD xOther: :Project No.286500 City/State: TIGARD, OR (REVISED EXISTING) , , _massan.masammmammmffamssffffsaaassamaammaammmfmmfmaaammammmammaasassmmsmmasas; SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET lsamaammmmafmmfrmmmmwfmf affffafmaamvfafamafammamamsmmmammmmmmmmaammmamamafaaaal LANE ! 3 ! 4 ! 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 1 10 1 11 ' 1 13 GROUP: Ideal !No. ILn.W. !HvyVehlGrade I Pkq. !BusBlk :AreaTp!Rt TrnILt Trn:AdjSat -----1 Sat. !of 1 Fw 1 Fhv I Fg { Fp : Fbb 1 Fa I Frt 1 Flt !F1wRt 1 1 21 Fluw !Lns1 ------I ------1 ------I------I ------I------I------1------! S Ap1Mvlpcphgp! N 1T.9-5 1T.9-6 :T.9-7 IT.9-8 1T.9-9 1T.9-101T.9-111T.9-121 (vphq ) =mlam;sfffmmlafm;mffammlfffafulsamffflffffmflsmf mmmlaf mffm{aafmaslaammmflmmamfm I A! 1800 1 1 ! 1 .0001 0.9901 0.9901 1 .000: 1 .000! 1 .000! 1 .000! 0.950! 1676 FBI 1 Q! 1800 1 1 1 1 .0001 0.990! 0.990! 1 .000! 1 .0001 1 .0001 0.8501 1 .0001 1500 WB1 I 1 ! I 1 ! ! ! ! ! I 1 ! 1 1 ! ! I ! NQI F ! 1800 1 1 1 1 .0001 0.9901 0.9901 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 1764 1 U: 1800 1 1 1 1.0001 0.990! 0.990! 1 .0001 1 .000! 1 .0001 0.8501 1 .000! 1500 1 Al 1800 1 2 1 1 .0001 0.990: 1 .0101 1 .000! 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 0.9201 3312 581 E1 1800 1 1 11 .000! 0.9901 1 .01v;1 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .000! 1.000! 1800 ! ! I ! 1 ! I I I I ' -----------•---------------------------------------- !LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[ aaa a PROTCTO, +++ m PERMTTO, ### f PROTCTO 8 PERMTTDII I ------------------------------------ ----------- A I E ! Q 1 a I ! ! , , ! 1 v I ----- ---------------------------------- - 1 _ -----MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI -------------------------------------------------•----------------------------- : Intersection:GREENBURG 0 HWY 217 SOUTH Date:APRIL 1987 1 !Analyst DPO/MEI TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK HOURArea Type: CBD XOther : :Propact No.286S00 City/State: TIGARD, OR (REVISED EXISTING ) ; asaeas=as:s�s�=��:sa===a=======cays�aasaa==aa=s===maa==as=a===e====saas�aaaas; SUPPLEMENTAL WORKSHEET FOR LEFT-TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR, fLT ; : INPUT_VARIABLES/COMPUTATIONS ! EB : WB !_NB_: S8 I !Cycle Length, C ( sac ) !Effective Green, q (sec ) !Number of Lanes, N ; Total Approach Flow Rate, Va( vph )l ;Mainline Flow Rate, Vm ( vph ) !Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt ( vph ) !Proportion of LT, Pit :Opposing Lanes, No !Opposing Flow Rate, Vo ( vph ) (Prop. of LT in Opp. Vol . Plto I !Sop 1800No/( 1+Plto[ ( 400+Vm )etc. ! !Yo Vo/Sop I :Gu (g-CYo )/( 1-Yo ) :Fs = (87S-0.625Vo )/l000 :P1 = Plt[ 1+(N-1 )g/(FsCu+4.5 )l : !Gq a g - Gu :Pt = 1 - P1 :Gf = 2Pt[ 1-Pt"( .5Gq )1/P1 IE1 = 1800/( 1400-Vo ) !Fm = Gf/g + Gu/g « [ 1/( 1+P1 etc . ! ! ; ! ; !Flt ( Fm + N - 1 )/N I I 1---------------------------------------------------- ---------------------- I MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI ------------------------------------------------------------------------------i I ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Intersection:GREENBURG @ HWY 217 SOUTH Date:APRIL 1987 : Analyst ;DPO/MEI TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK HOIJRArea Type: CBD �.Ifher ; :Project No.286500 City/State TIGARD, OR ( REVISFO EXISTING ) I CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET : ====z xx xexzxxn-xzx=ami==a=arrnaxzxxmxxxaox r.vesnzz=zvxcxxv-c=xxmss=====cn==z=i ILANE GROUP 3 ! 4 ! 5 6 7 1 8 ! 9 1 I -----------1 Adjusted :Ad.Sat : Flow Ratio Green :Ln.Grp : v/C !Crit . 1 1 1 1 2 ! Flow Rate :F1w.Rt ! Ratio 1Capac. 1 Ratio : 7 1 {Appy. :Mvmf . : v 1 s I v/s g / C :c,vph 1 X Lane I 1 ! ( vph) : ( vphg ): 314 1 4..6 ! 3/7 !Group ! larsaxl n.x-, -x=xsrwrrrrlsrasu larrrraarrrrr -ra:alararsxa ; -�x��:;a:arass�xaaxx 1 ! P a5: - : 1676 1 0.270 - 1 0.348 1 583 ! 0.775 1 ►A• I EB : I ! 1 ! ! O 231 - 1 1500 ! 0. 154 - 1 0.348 1 522 1 0.443 I-----: - ----- ----l------:-----------------:-------1 -----1 -------: ! I WB { ! ! ! I 1 ! I I I-----I-----I----------- 1 ------l-----------------1-------1 ------I ! ! ! 1 ! I ! 1 { I I 1 1 NB 1 E 1 516 - 1 1764 1 0.292 - 1 0.377 1 665 1 0.776 1 •++ ! : 1 0 1 109 - 1 1500 1 0.073 - : 0.000 : 0 : 0.000 1 - 1 l-----:-----: -----------I ------1-----------------1-------:------:-------l-----1 : 1 A 1 533 - 1 3312 : 0. 161 - : 0.208 1 688 : 0.775 I +++ 1 1 SB 1 E 1 671 - 1 1800 1 0.373 - 1 0.618 1 1112 1 0.603 : - 1 I------------- -------------- ---------------------------------------------------I :Cycle Length- 90.Osec, Lost Time/Cycle,L- 6.05ec, S( v/s )ci- 0.723, Xc=0.775! I------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------1 !LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[— - PROTCTD, +++ - PERMTTD, ##4 - PROTCTO 8 PERMTTDII 1---------------------------------------------------------- --------------: 1 A 1 E I AAAA � •AAAi l AAAA I 1 I 1 ! A 1 I 1 I I 1 ! I V 1 ! 1-------------------•---- ---•-----------•--_----_---------•---•-_-----•--------------I ! MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI { ------------------------------------------------•------------------------------- : Intersection: GREENBURG 0 HWY 217 SOUTH Oate:APRIL 1987 :Analyst -DPO/MEI T1mePeriod Anlyzd PM PEAK HOURArea Type CBD XOther: :Project No 286500 City/State TIGARD, OR (REVISED EXISTING ) i _oxaxasaxxasaa r.xxasxaaaa!!Galasslaxaxa!lxasaalaaaaxaxasasasaaalasaaaaaaaaaasa! LEVEL-OF-SERVICE_WORKSHEET ; 1 :, First Term Delay 1 Second Term Delay _,ITot .Delay_8_LOS LANE 3 1 4 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 I 9 1 10 1 111 12 1 13 GROUP! v/c I Green: Cycle! Delay I Lane! Delay IPrgrsn!Lane Gp: Ln: Apprch:Apr -----: Ratio: RatiolLengthl dl !Group) d2 !Fact )rl Delay 1 GpI Delay ILOS 1 1 21 X : Q/C I C ! sec/vehlCap,clsec/vehl PF : sec/ve:IILOSIsec/vehlTbl Ap:Mv1 1 1 ( sec ) ! 1 ( vph )I 1T.9-131 (6+8 )•919-1I : 9-1 allaala!!!!!}salxa!}xa!!al!}alasxxt,!!!a!}aaaa!!!}aaaal �laxxlaaalaaalaaaaxxslsaa 1 A: 0.7751 2.348: 90.01 19. 90: 5831 4.47: 1 .00 : 24.,7: C I I EB: : I : I I : I I I I 21 . 19i C 1 01 0.4431 0.3481 J0.0: 17. 181 5221 0.411 0.85 14.95! B 1 1 I --- 1 WB: I I I I I 1 : I I 1 0.00: • I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 I I I 1 1 } 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I NBI E: 0.7761 0.0001 90.0: 34.20: 6651 3.991 0.85 I 32.461 D 1 31 .871 D : Q! 0.0001 0.000! 90.01 34.201 01 0.001 0.85 1 29.071 D I I 1 Al 0.7751 0.2081 90.0 75.58: 6881 3.841 1 .00 1 29.421 D 1 1 581 EI 0.6031 0.2081 90.0: 24.541 1112! 0.68: 0.50 1 12.61 : B 1 20.05; C I I I I I I I I I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ! Intersection Delay 23.30 sec/veh, Intersection LOS C Table 9. 1 1 I-----------------------------------------------------------------------------1 :LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-( *** - PROTCTD, +++ - PERMTTD ##* - PROTCTO 8 PERMTTDII I -----------------------------------------------------------------------------! 1 A I E 1 Q 1 ! I } rrrr I rrrr> } rrrr } } { I 1 • I } I ! 1 v 1 ' I -------------------------------------------•------------' I MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI I ---------------------------------------••--------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- 1 INPUT WORKSHEET _ ] Intersection:GREENBURG @ HWY217 NORTH Date APRIL 1987 IAnalyet DPO/MEI TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK HOURArea T,pe CBD KGther ; !Project No.286500 C, ty,'State TIGARD, OR ( REVISED EXISTING ) cif xzaz-----esasa=zsrax zoa-- saris-a:aasxzssszsnsszzsaaac=-•- ___- _ , :VOLUME WJO vEOMETP,rS ;GREENBURG N 7 ST. ; 90% 0ZTof7 1 1 902] 280 r2Eiiu�noN SB TOTAL ; 1 2 _ gV-k (ZT02 ; ; 1 ; 12.0 ; 0 1 48S] I : KED ucT1ON v ; ; 1.'.0 -WB TOTAL I (N) �G64 868 0; RT TH 205 v ----------------- NORTH v ---RT-12.0' -1 ; ; IDENTIFY IN DIAGRAM r : : .Volumes ----------------- ----------------- ' l2.Lenes, lane widths ; LT TH 1 HWY 217 RAMPS 1 :3.Movements by lane 0 12.0 ; ; E/W STREET 14.Parking locations - : 453 r 1�.0r , 15.Bay storge ingths i 01 0 I 1 1 205 <°> 0 :6. Islands E/13 TOTAL I r 6581 17.Bus stops 0 1 ; N,'B TOTAL : TRAFFIC AND RJADWAY CONDITIONS {i!!!a!!!!lLsas2a=xass :ssfiaria=====-T!■ifs..as..._=smm_-_�s__s�:__a;___sssfii{ :AplGrd. 1 % HV ; Adi .Pk.g.Lane Buses 1 PHF ,Cnf .Ppd; Pedstrn Button: Arr. 1 ;pr1 ( X ) I ; Y/N 1 Nm ; ( Nb ) I ; ( pd,hr Y/N ;Mn.Time: Type; ;FB; +0.0: 2.0 ; N ; 0 : 0 1 0.90 r 0 N 0 1 5 : ;WB; +0.0; 2.0 : N : 0 : 0 0.90 r 0N : 0 1 3 1 ;PJB; +0.01 2.0 1 N : 0 1 0 ; 0.90 r 0 N ; 0 1 4 1 SB ' +0.0; 2.0 I N ; 0 1 0 0.90 r 0 ; N 0 1 3 1 ----------------------------------- -- --— - ---- ----------- --—-- ----------i ;Grade: +L,V,-down Nb :buses stopping/hr Min.Tlming min,--reen for , IHV:veh. ; 4 whls PHF:peak-hour factor pedestrian crossing; INm:pkg.maneuvers/hr Cnf .Peds :Cnflctng peds/hr Arr.Type: Type _ r r =sada==a=mssamsanaz-aa¢o zr.aaxxa-vaxaaaa=a ___ _a-as==xaasxss�cs m - _ :PHASING r exanaa==znsaazsysexs-...essmnxv-xnaa_aamaa=a=aseam==mrxan=xaxm==a____.-zsazaaa=_s , 1 D I I IC�r carts I I A ; I v ; ► I { : : G ; I 1 v 1 R 1 I I I ' r 1 A ; 4w I M 1 r 1 I 1 1 1 I I ' r :Tim- : G- 0.01 G- 0.0; G= 0.0; G- 0.0; G- 0.0; Gm 0.01 G- 0.01 G! 0.0; 1 ing ; Y+R- OIY+R- O;Y+R= O; Y+R= O;Y+R- OIY+Ra OIY+R= 01Y+R- 01 IPtmd/Act : A : A I A I I---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Protected turns: ••••" 0000 I Permitted '.urns : ++++" 1 Cycle Length 90 Sec : I---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -I I MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ! Intersection;GREENSURG 0 HWY217 NORTH Date:APRIL 1987 ;Analyst :DPO/MEI TimePeriod Anlyzd.PM PEAK HOURArea Type: C60 XOther ; !Project No.286S00 City/;tate TIGARD, OR (REVISED EXISTING ) - 1 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORkSHEET _=naaxsxsxazsxsnxe=czxs-ea3saxmaasaasaassaae.saaaav s,e=ass-__==-Szae.cs.2n-______ 1 3 1 5 3 1 7 ; 8 ; 9 10 11 IAppr. 1 Mvt. l Mvt . Peak FLow ; Lane !F1w rt ;Numberl Lane ; Adj . 1 Prop. { 1 :Volume{ How- I Rate ;Group lin Ln : of ;Utili�! Flow 1 of 1 I 1(vph) ;Factor! Vo ;Grp Vg!Lanes IFctr,U! V,vphl LT or RTI 1 : I PHF 1 3/4 N ; Tb 9-4; 7 . 91P1t , Prt : taasryt�tasi��Isaasa-� -a-a=xaz=maisxx=3a� -=r.a==la=axami =aasataaaaaf�amxosa c. 1 1 LT 1 0; 0.90 01 1 ; 1 0.00 LT 1 EB 1 TH 1 O; 0.130 0; I I ; 1 1 1 RT 1 0; 0.90 ; 0. I I l ; 0.00 Rr I -----; -----1 ;------; ------ ------ ' --- -- ; ------; ------; ------f------- - 1 LT 1 2051 0.90 I 338; A ; 2281 1 1 1 .00 1 3281 1 .00 LT WR TH I 0; 0. 90 1 0; ; 1 « RT 1 2801 0.90 I 3111 Q I 3111 1 l 1 .00 1 3111 1 .00 RT 1 I 1_T 205; G.90 1 2291 A I &281 1 1 1 .00 1 223; 1 .00 LT 1 1 NB TH 453! 0.90 I 5031 E 1 503; 1 1 1 .00 1 S03: # 1 1 ; RT ; 0; 0.90 I 0! 1 I 1 1 0.00 RT 1 LT ; 01 0.90 : 0! : 1 1 1 0.00 LT l 1 SB ; TH l 8481 0.90 l 9641 E 1 9641 2 { I I RT 1 641 0.90 1 711 Q 1 711 1 1 1 .00 : 711 1 .00 RT ; 1 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------1 !LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[ ««« - PROTCTO, +++ - PERMTTO, fkitlt PROTCTO & PERMTTDI ; I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 1 1 A I E 1 Q 1 ; I ------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------- i MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCR° by PSI 1 -------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- --------------------------- : Intersection GREENBURG 0 HWY217 "FORTH -Date APRIL 1987 1 AnalystlDPO/MEI TimePeriod Anlyzd PM PEAK HOURArea Type: CBO XOther : :Project No.286500 City/State TIGARO, OR (REVISED EXISTING) _=__m==:�a=xxas=sns=a==asa=o=aa=c=ssnsxea==ee=sx=ss=vssaxaa=asca=sxesaaxaaaazs; SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORH.SHEET •. - aas==ssnas=san=�==s=cs=c=asxx=sssaa=a"=xasssssascs=saga=zasaasa; 1 LANE 3 4 ; 5 : 6 1 7 S 9 10 ! 11 12 : 13 GROUP: Idea, No. ;Ln.W. :HvyVeh:Grade 1 Pkg. 1Bus8Ik;AreeTp :Rt Trn:L`. Trn;Ad,{Sat -----1 Set . :of : Fw 1 Fhv 1 Fg 1 Fp 1 Fbb 1 Fa 1 Frt 1 Flt !F1wRt 1 1 21 Flow :Lns :------'------: ----...-i ---- 1------1 ------1------1 ------1 S Ap!Mv :pcphgpl N 1T.9-5 1T.9-6 1T.9-7 1T.9-8 :T.9-9 ! T.9-101T.9-i1 :T.9-12! ( vphg) aaiaa; z'an.aaa{aaa;a:a aaaa;aaanas� asasa=; -=e=a=;axaaas;asasaa{azasxa� aaasaa{aaaasa EBI 1 i I I 1 A! 1800 1 1 1 1 .0001 0.9901 1 .000! 1.000; 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 0.9501 1693 WB! : I i 1 Q! 1800 1 1 i 1 .0001 0.990! 1 .000! 1 .0001 1 .000! 1 .0001 0.8501 1.000! 1515 I A! 1800 1 1 1 1 .W00! 0.990! 1 .91001 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .000'. 1 .0001 0.9501 1693 NBI E; 1800 I 1 1 1.0001 0.9901 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .000! 1 .0001 1 .0001 1782 SBI E! 1.800 1 2 1 1 .0001 0.9901 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 1.0001 1 .0001 3564 -1 -Q: -1800-1-1-1 -1_000: -0_990`-1+000! -1_0001 -10001-1 000:-O.dS0_-1_0001 -1S1S- :LANE GROUP CIAGRAMS-lrrr - PROTCTD, +++ PERMTTD, 44# a PROTCTD 6 PERMTTDI1 i ------------ ------------------------•------------------------•------------------1 1 A ! E i Q 1 1 1 « 1 ! ! I rrre ; rrrr> ; rrrr i i ---------------------------------------------------- ------------------------I 1 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI ! ---------------•---- ------------------------------------------------------------ r1 4 --------------- .---------------------------------------te------- ----------------- IIntersect:on:GREENBURG @ HWY217 NORTH DaAPRIL 1987 !Analyst :DPO/MEI TimePeriod Anlywd:PM PEAK HOURArea Type CBD XOther ; :Project No.286600 City/State:T;GARD, OR (REVISED EXISTING ) Iaaasamasaasaa:a=aas=aaa�==s�=xsas:camas=a:en=za�asa==a=a_s_�=xezz=c��==i�-s=:=�' ISUPPLEIENTAL WORKSHEET FOP LEFT-TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR fLT I INPUT_VAP,IABLES/COMFUTATIONS EBWB_ --PJB-: (Cycle Length, C ( sec ) lEffactive Green, g ( sec ) ; l !Number of Lanes, N I 1 !Total Approach Flow Rate, Va( vph )! I IMairline Flow Rate, Vm ( vph ) I I I ! ILeft-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt (vphl I I I I IProportion of LT, Pit ! I !Opposing Lanes, No I !Opposing Flow Rate, Vo ( vph ) I !Prop. of LT in Opp. Vol . Pito I ! I ! !Sop 180ONo/( l+Plto[ ( 40@+Vm )etc. 1 ! I IYO VO/Sop I I ! ICU (g-CYo )/( 1-Yo) I I I I IFs = ( 875-0.62SVo )/1000 I ! ! ! ! IPl Plt11+(N-1 )g/(FsGu+4.5 )1 I ! I I ! !Gq = g - Gu I ! I ! ! { !Pt - i - P1 ! ! I !Gf = 1'Pt11-Pt"( .5Gq )1/P1 I ! ! !E1 - 1800/( 1400-Vo ) ! I I !Fm = Gf/g + Gu/g * [ 1/( I+P1 etc. I ! ! ! I IFIt a (Fm + N - 1 )/N I I---------------------- --------------------------------------------'--------- I---------MACKENZIE-ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI ----------------------------------------------------------I I I �e. 1 I I ----------------------- ---------------- --------------------------------- - --- : Intersection GREENBURG-@ HWY217 NORTH - Date APRIL 1987 - - :Analyst :DPO/MEI TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK HOURArea Type: CBD XOther: !Project No.286500 City/State TIGARD, OR ( REVISED EXISTING) ; ;maaamaa-sassaaaasaaaaaaasamaa-sasaaaaaaassamasaaasaaasaaasaaaaasaaaaxaamaaasa; ! CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET ; ;aaaaaam-saaaaaaasasaaaasamzammsaaaaaasaaanaaaasaaaaaaasa-aaaasaasaasaaaaaamaa; !LANE GROUP ! 3 1 4 : S I 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 ; I----- -1 Adjusted IAd.Sat : Flow Ratio I Green :Ln.Grp: v/C !Crit . 1 ! 1 : 2 1 Flow Rate :F1w.Rt1 ! Ratic !Capac. 1 Ratio 1 7 : IAppr, :Mvmt , : v : s ! V/s C i ::,`iph X :Lane I I (vph) : ( vphg ): 3/4 I 1 4,.6 3/7 !Group ! ;saaaalaaaaa;aaasaa saaaa;aaaasa;masaaaaataaaaasaalaasaasaiaasasa;saaaa a:e;samas; I EB I 1-----1 -----1-----------1------:-----------------1-------: ------:-------1-----I ! I A 1 228 - 11693 1 0. 135 - 1 0.306 1 518 1 0.440 ; 1 I WB : I I I I I I I ! Q 1 311 - 11515 10.205 - 1 0.306 1 463 : 0,671 1 +•• ! 1 -----1-----: -----------I------I------------------:-------1------I-------I-----! I 1 A 1 228 _ 1 1693 1 0. 135 - 1 0.202 1 342 1 0.667 1 »*» ! I NB I E 1 503 11782 : 0.282 10.660 : 1176 1 0.428 1 - I '-----I-----l-----------'------' -----------------' ----' -- ------I-----I 1 SB 1 E : 1012 - 1 3564 1 0.284 - 1 0.425 : 1515 : 0.668 1 »»» ! I 1 -Q--1 ---71-- - 1 ISIS 1 -0.047- ------1-0-425 1 644 1 0. 110 1 - I------- ------------ ----- -------------------------I !Cycle Length- 90.05ec, Lost Time/Cycle,L- 6.0sec, S( v/a )ci- 0.624, Xc=0.669! I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------I !LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[»»» - PP.OTCTO, +++ - PERMTTO, #44 - PROTCTO & PERMTTDI : I -----------------------------------------------------------------------------I I A : E 1 Q 1 I 1 I » ! 1 I ! v 1 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------! f MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI ! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I ---------------------------------- ------------- : Intersection;GREENSURG @ HWY217 NORTH Date:APRIL 1987 - - :Analyst :DPO/MEI TimePeriod Anlyzd PM PEAK HOURArea Type CBD XOther: :Project No.286S00 City/State: TIGARD, OR (REVISED EXISTING ) , a=aasasasaaasaaaax=as=ssaasaaaaasaerasaasaasaaa-aaassasaaasaaaaaaaasaasa:ssl LEVEL-OF-SERVICE_WORKSHEET 1.__ Flrst Term Delay I Second Term Delay :Tot .Delay_&_L05 LANE ! 3 4 : S 1 6 ! 7 8 ! 9 : 10 GROUP: v,c ; Green: Cycle! Delay 1 Lane: Delay :Prgrsn!Lane Gp: Ln; A1� ' 13 --1 Ratio; Ratio:Length) dl !Group; d2 !F• actorl Delay 1 GPI Delay ay! LOS 1 1 2: X : g/C C : sec/veh:Cap,c : sec/veh! PF : sec/veh:LOS: sec/vehlTbl Ap;Mv1 ; sec ): : ( vph )1 :T.9-131 (6+8 )»9:9-1 ! aa;aa� aasaaa;aaaama aaans; aaasaaa'====_' , • 9-1 , , ==aa=a-,aswsaalaaaassa;saa;a=aerassla== EBI : � � ! ' 1 1 1 ! 0.00: » 1 ! A: 0.440; 0.3071 90.01 18.981 5181 0.401 1 .00 1 19.39: C I WB1 ; : 1 19.62: C : QI 0.671 ! 0.3071 90.01 40.681 4631 4.61 : 0.8S 1 19.80; C 1 1 A! 0.667: 0.4011 90.0: 25. 191 3421 3.38; 1 .00 1 28.571 D 1 NBI E: 0.4281 0.2011 90.01 23.86: 117612 0. 16 . 0.6. 14, 90. B 19. 16! C SBI E1 0.GS8: 0.000: 90.01 34.20: ISIS: 0.811 0.8S : 29.76: D : 29.71 ! D --_-Q: 0. 110! 0.0001 90.01 34.20: 6441 0.00: 0.8S : 49.071 D 1 -------------------------------- ------------------ ! Intersection Delay 24. 12 sec/veh, Intersection LOS C Tab1E 9. 1 1 1-------------------------- _ ---------------- -------------------------- !LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[*»» = PROTCTD, +++ - PERMTTO, 444 = PROTCTO & PERMfTOI : : - ---------------------------- ------------------- A E Q I i i V 1 '--------- ! ----MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI ------ ---------------------------------------------------------- 5 LOCATION:GREENBURG @ LOCUST NAME: 1-0. 5. -REVISED EXISTING ---------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------- -- HOURLY VOLUMES Grade 0% 1 N = 1 1 30 1 V1.. S N 1 1 Vil 20 _z=cm=oa==coo_=_=esaaa I 1 V10 N= i V Grade 0% ------"----VS-- 524 N= 2 10 --V1------------ ----------V4-- 40 422 --V------------- major road Grade 0% 4S -V3----------- G.B.NORTH V7i f asses=s=szas=amaaseaaa 1 105 1 1 1 STOP . ; V8 1 YIELD N- 2 6 1 Date of Counts;MAR. 1987 { V9 1 Time Period:PM PEAK HOUR f minor road SO Prevailing Speed: 3S 1 LOCUST PHF: .BS 1 Grade 0 Population: 1000000 xssss==xaxc=sx==x=xsx .====sxxsxcsssxxaz=asass::axo=sasasaasasasaasaaaasaaaassaaa VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Movf.mert no. 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 B 1 9 , 10 1 11 , 12 - ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume (vph) 1 101 4221 451 401 5241 151 1051 61 S01 201 51 30, --••-------------- --------------------------------------------------------------1 Vol' ocph ), Tab. 10. 1 101XxXX1XXXX1 411XXXXIXXXXI 1051 61 501 201 51 301 ==cn xear o=a = xmmx=Xaa»saasaxzssaxm:a=,aazsasaaaasaaaa��aaasaal��araaaaraaa �GLUMES IN PCPH 1 { I 30 I I V12 I f 1 S I 1 1 V11 I I I vie =__======axxaaa.==a== : 1 V f ? "------- --V6-- as <-----------VS•-- as 10 --V1------------" v----------V4-- 41 --V2------------> --V3- -----------v <IA 1 ) __ cxs_-r_== x-aozasxm V7 f i xx_-v._-m==axaza rxa=mz-x 1 105 1 1 1 V8 1 1 ( 6 f 1 1 V9 I ' 50 f LOCATION:GREENB'JRG @ LOCUST NAME L.O.S.-REVISED EXISTING STEP-1 RT From Minor Street 1 /_--V9---- -% U1C Conflicting Flows, Vc 1 1/2 VG+VS=vc1.' 1 23+ til= '234 vph 1 8+ 262- 270 vph Critical Gap, Tc ( Tab.10.2 ) 1 5 ( secs. ) 1 5 ( sate. ) Potential Capacity,Cp(FiglO.3)1 Cp9 - 948 pcph 1 Cp12 - 914 pcph X of Cp utilized I (V9/Cp9 ),100- S.3Z 1 (V12/Cp12 )"lOO- 3,3% Impedance Factor, P (Fig. 10.5)1 P9- .97 1 P12= .98 I Actual Capacity, Cm 1 Cm9=Cp9= 948 pcph I Cml.'=Cpl&'- 914 pcph STEP 2 LT From Mayor Street V4 V1 =aa=sasxasasxxaazzzaaaxxzxaaaxsaxxxaxmxaxxxz=za=xa=axx.--aaaz=z=xasa=a_=aaxzcaaa Conflicting Flows, Vc I V3+V2-Vc4 1 VG+VS=Vcl j 1 45+ 422- 467 vph 1 1S+ S24= 539 vph Critical Gap, Tc (Tah. 10.2 ) 1 5 ( secs. ) 1 5 ( secs. ) Potential Capacity,Cp(Fig10.3 ) 1 Cp4 - 740 pcph 1 Cpl - 679 pcph % of Cp utilized 1 (l�4/Cp4 ),,100- S.5% 1 (V1/Cpl )'-.100- 1 .5% Impedance Factor, P (Fig. 10.5 ) 1 P4- .97 1 P1= .99 Actual Capacity , Cm 1 Cm4=Cp4= 740 pcph 1 Cml=Cpl= G79 pcph asazaasas r.xss-actio=.aaaxvxza-zxv _=zxssx===_xs==xaaa axa-azz-_x__-=__.-x-._____-c_ STEF 3' 7H Minor Street 1 V8 V11 xxzz===sxe�.a ac��easaa•==za=c=zs.-__==xxza___z=axxxaxxasaaaxxxzaxxaasazzs=xxzxaeaas { Conflicting Fl,)us, Uc 1 .SV3+V2+V1+VG+VS+V4=Vc81 .SVG+VS+V4+V3+V2+V1=Uci1 f 23+ 422+ 10+ 15+ 1 8+ 524+ 40+ 45+ 1 524+ 40- 1034 vph 1 422,+ 10= 1049 vph Critical Gap, Tc ( Tab. 10.2 ) 1 6 ( secs. ) 1 6 ( secs. ) Potential Capacity,Cp(Fig10.3 )1 CpB - 2161 pcph 1 Cpll - 25S pcph % of Cp utilized 1 (V8/Cp8 )f.100- 2.3% 1 (V11/Cpll )x100- 2% Impedance Factor, P (Fig. l0.5)1 P80 .99 1 Plla .99 1 CmB-CpBAP1x,P4 I Cmll-Cp11xP1xP4 Actual Capacity, Cm 1251= '61,,.99x .97pcph 1 245- 2SSx.99x.97pcph ,�-__.-_-.-._====_aaa=c=azx -aaazvzsaax=sam�n:xxxz:.z=ax=sxxxssaasz----.xxsaazaxaxxaax STEP 4 LT From Minor Street V10 s=xaa-n--xa=nsazxxxsmasx=__cc_�xxxxzax=sxxsmaas==xssa=scx:axxxsxssaaxxazxxa===aa Confl:ctinq Flows, Vc 1 Vc8( step3 )+V11+V12-Vc71 Vcll( step3 )+VB+V9-VcIO 1 1034+ S+ 30- 1069vph 1 1049+ 6+ 50- 1105vph Critical Gap, Tc ( Tab. 10.2 ) 1 6.5 ( secs. ) 1 6.5 ( secs. ) Potential Capacity,Cp(Fig10.3 ) I Cpl - 209 pcph I Cp10 = 199 pcph Actual Capacity, Cm I Cm7-Cp7xP1xP4xP11xP12 1 Cm10-Cp10xP4xP1xP8xP9 1 = 209x.99x.97x.99x.98 1 - 199x.97x.99x .99x.97 1 = 195 pcph 1 - 184 pcph xx=zsxazvxxxx-a=._c===s_c= ==a-z=xs:a==:=_=a=a=zxxaav=zzse_=ax _... z= a=ax=x=zax i LOCATIOW GREENBURG @ LOCUST NAME:L.O.S.-REVISED EXISTING SHAPED LANE CAPACITY APPROACH MOVEMENTS 7,8,9 CR CR LOS L05 MOVEMENT V( PCPH ) CM( PCPH ) CSH(PCPH ) (CM-V ) ( CISH-V ) CM CSH .o===ca=s.=zaxes=-sax=z==sax...=s=_--=ssa=raxxxaxaaaaaaz= 105 195 90 E B 6 'All S1 731 245 675 C A 9 50 948 731 898 67S A A APPROACH MOVEMENTS 10, 11 ,1 CR CR LOS LOS MOVEMENT V� PCPH ) CM(PCPH ) CSH(PCPH) ( CM-0 (CSH-k) ) CM CSH ___---�.-._--_-aasza=x.asaxxeaaxxsaaa====exxxxas===xoxxxr=x s=asaaaxs s==csr=- 10 .10 184 340 164 .185 D C 11 5 Z4S 340 240 Z85 C C 12 30 914 340 884 285 A C MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS 1 ,4 MOVEMENT V( PCPH ) CM( PCPH ) CR(CM-V ) 1 .75 =exs.===a=_xx_-=xz-axaamxxxammaa:amaassamammmsmmmmmasammasaam=.a sexr_==__=s..ac 1 10 679 669 A 4 L1 740 699 A COMMENTS 1 I � y LOCATIOW HALL 0 OAK NAME:L.O.S.-REVISEO EXIST _--•------------------------------ HOURLY VOLUMES Grade 0% I N - 1 ! I V12 ; `1 ! <N ! I V11 I I I 30 ........ ............= I I V10 ..r.....-....rr....... 30 Grade 0Y <----------V5-- 486 N- 1 47 --V1----------- v----------V4-- 32 430 --V2------------ major road Grade 0% 10 --V3------------v <I I > HALL V7 I 1 -------••�•-.awa....r. 15 1 1 1 STOP .xx V8 1 1 YIELD 1 N- 1 31 1 1 Date of Counts:MAR. 1987 I V9 I Time Period:PM PEAK, HOUR 1 minor road 83 1 Prevailing Speed:35 1 OAK I PHF: .BS I Grade 0 'i I Population 75000 Somme.=...........z==z�mx_sm-ar_=ea=z.vasa...a.r.....................r.a.....r- VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS -----------------------. -------------------------------- -- Movement no. 1 1 2 3 4 1 S 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 1 10 1 11 1 12 I t -------------------------------•------------------------------------------------ Volume ( vph ) 1 471 4301 101 321 4861 301 151 31 : 831 301 211 621 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vol(pcph ),Tab. 10.11 S21XXXXIXXXXI 35!XXXXIXXXXI 171 341 911 331 231 Be: a..�.......r..•w.....w.........-rr...-rr.....r.....r........r.........r.a...s-: VOLUMES IN PCPH I I j I 68 1 I V12 1 1 1 23 I 1 Vil I 1 ! 33 ....mvmu.s.r.mm..ans:aa- I I U10 ..a.................. G---- VG-- -----------VS,__ --•------VS-- .. 52 - V1----------- v----------V4-- 35 VZ------------ a _0-----------v c ! 1 x.a,................ V7 1 1 .......r.............. 17 1 ! 1 V8 1 34 I 1 V9 I 91 1 i 1 _ LC!CATIuN HALL @ oHr NAME:L.0.5.-REVISED EXIST _--====vz.anexoaa.xz__sss.aaazo..a<n..v.__v_eao:asxasa.arrrrrsssrsrsr=a.===..-_z�=_ SrFP 1 RT From I!inor Street ,19 Sao r..s._a.:z3..ov_=saascz_v-e_Seas.x_.z=vacs_nsa=-==--aarssssrra:-cc=os_a.zxmaxaxc Conflicting Flows, Vc 1 1/2 V3+V:.-Vc9 1 1/2 V6+VS-Vc12 I S+ 430- 43S vph 1 IS+ 486- S01 vph Critical Gap, Tc ( Tab. 10.2 ) 1 S.5 ( secs. ) 1 5.5 ( secs. ) Potential Capacity,Cp(Fiy10.3 )1 Cp9 - 674 pcph 1 Cpl2 - 64 pcph % of Cp utilized 1 (V9/Cp9 )r.100- 1'.5% 1 ( V12/Cpl2 )x100- 10.91 Impedance Factor, P (Fig. 10.5 ) 1 P9- .91 1 P12- .93 Actual Capacity, Cm I Cm9-Cp9- 674 pcph 1 Cml2-Cpl2- 624 pcph xx.....=x-x-za=.a.aa..a.:sa=a3csa=x...za.=.=c=aaaasz:za...... -=— .. .c STEP LT From Mayor Street -- V4 -- V1 -�._sve_a..s-a.zxex_maxax-._x ane-xa_rassasaxxaaeva_._=vcs.aa=s=asaaaexaz=s.r�-._v__ Conflicting Flows, Vc. 1 V3+V2-Vc4 1 VG+VS-Vcl 1 10+ 430- 440 vph 1 30+ 486- S16 vph Critical Gap, Tc ( Tab. 10.2 ) 1 5 ( secs. ) 15 ( secs. ) Potential Capacity,Cp(Figl0.3 )1 Cp4 - 764 pcph { Cpl - 697 pcph % of Cp utilized I (V4/Cp4 )x100= 4.G% I (V1/Cpl )x100- 7.5% Impedance Factor, P (Fig. 10.S ) 1 P4- .97 1 P1- .96 Actual Capacity, Cm I Cm4-Cp4- 764 pcph 1 Cmt-Cpl- 697 pcph zaazsxx.a:a.xzzaaaa.zaa.a..ax=xaaanmzxzzaaa»z===a_.a_._z_.aza._.=xss.-sa._xzx_ STEP ; TH From Minor Street V8 V11 szna-aszssmzz:axxz..==r.aa.a.saa..zs_aaa=rs.za axaaa:..z..a.........ana......rra Conflicting Flows, Vc 1 .SV3+V2+Vi+VG+VS+V4=Uc81 .SV6+VS+V4+V3+V2+Vl-Vcll 1 S+ 430+ 47+ 30+ 1 1S+ 486+ 32+ 10+ 1 486+ 32- 1030 vph 1 430+ 47- 1020 vph Critical Gap, Tc ( Tab. 10.2 ) 1 6 ( secs. ) 1 6 ( secs. ) Potential Capacity,Cp(Fig10.3 ) 1 Cp8 - 263 pcph 1 Cpll - 267 pcph % of Cp utilized 1 (VB/Cp8 )x100- 12.9%. 1 (V11/Cp11 )x100- 8.6% Impedance Factor, P (Fig. 10.5 )1 P8- .92 1 Pilo .95 Actual Capacity, Cm 1 CMB-CpBxP1xP4 1 CMII=Cp11-P1xP4 1245- 263x .96x .97pcph 1 249- 267- . 96x . 9,n :ph .....Wa.........aaa.ra..sa...a=aaaaxaac STEP 4 LT From Minor Street 1 V7 \-> V10 arrssra=.cn-a.orz-_ y-zQaa-zx.=:sr:.ea-_:-ax.zz:._..,Sam_-=xza..srrrr..z+...r.zzxa= Conflicting Flows, Vc 1 Vc8( 5tep3 )+VII+V12-Vc71 Vcli( step3 )+VB+V9-Vclo 1 1030+ 21+ 62- 1113vph 1 1020+ 31+ 83- 1134vph Critical Gap, Te ( Tab. 10.2 ) 16.5 ( secs. ) 1 6.5 ( secs. ) Potential Capacity,Cp(Fig10.3 ) 1 Cpl - 196 pcph 1 CpI0 - 190 pcph Actual Capacity, Cm 1 Cm7-Cp7xP1xP4f,P11.rP12 I CMIO-Cp10xP4xPlxPBxP9 I - 196x.96x.97x.9Sx.93 1 - 190x.97x.96x.92x.91 I - 161 pcph 1 - 148 pcph a==. ax.....................a .=a..xa-... _... .....,x.-�= -- LOCATION HALL @ OAK NAME:L.O.S.-REVISED EXIST SHARED LANE CAPACITY APPROACH MOVEMENTS 7,8,9 CR CR LOS LOS MOVEMENT ! PCPH CM(PCPH ) CSH(PCPH) (CM-V ) (CSH-V ) CM CS!i =aao-a-_ems.._a_=-xaaaar...t...r.a.....e®s.a.as.ra.s.........rnaa�csxaexxazznx 7 17 161 : 74 144 232 0 8 34 24S 374 211 232 C C 9 91 674 374 563 232 q r_ APPROACH MOVEMENTS 10, 11 , 12 CR cP LOS LOS MO(JEMENT V( PCPH ) CM(PCPH ) CSH(PCPH ) CM-V > ! CSH-t) ) CM CSH 10 33 148 292 115 Ise o 0 11 23 249 292 226 168 C U 12 68 624 292 556 168 (4 0 MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS 1,4 MOVEMENT IJ, PCPH ) :M(PCPH ) CR(CM-V ) LOS z.a.= -aa-.....s=seaaa-xv.-uas=....maxas.aa=�ssazz.e_a__ax-�xxx t S2 697 54S A 4 35 764 2q q COMMENTS LOCATION:OAK @ 95TH --------- :NAME:L_0_S__REVISED-EXIST ------------------ HOURLY VOLUMES 1 'VOLUMES IN PCPH N 1 MaJcr street OAK 1 sas a.sass"".s areswraaass sa swarm rimae&as : mssaamawraaaas"aa"aaassos"esaarasawaa No 1 -V5--- 56 1 ---US--- Grade lie--- v---V4--- S I ---V2-- J4--- 5 01. 48-- V3-- No 1 1 ---V3---v asaararmaa amo mama wmraamaama ; ass awaosrrra&aasa ; aasarrmmr Date of Counts 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 MAR. 1987 V7 V9 1 X STOP 1 1 V7 V9 Time Period 1 1 1 1 YIELD 1 1 PM PEAK: HOUR I 25 101 1 1 26 101 Appr--ach Speed: Minor Street : Grade 1 25 95TH 0% PHF: .65 No i Population: 1000000 srs"aama masa&..."memo sasaasmraaaama ssworrasrarmaorrossrarsmrroasemar Samoa aaaz"w VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS ------------------------------------------------------------- Movement no. I 2 1 3 4 1 5 1 7 9 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume ( vph ) 1 118 1 48 1 5 1 58 1 2S 10 1 -------------------------- 6 Vol(pcph ), see Table 10. 11XXXXXXXXIXXXXXXXXI S IXXXXXXXXI----------------- -----------------2 10 1 arzvaomasaammsaazasarar aro rarsrrrra:ar raovrarrsarrraamamararraassraraaress:eros STEP 1 : RT From Minor Street / V9 awsaaoaaora&maaraass mwsrarrrraos"omoas&rs&■rrmosarrrmsrsmmrmrrwvarrarrzaa"asoma Conflicting Flogs, Vc 1 1/2 V3+V2- 24 + 118 - 142 oph(Vc9 ) Critical Gap, Tc 1 Tc- 5 secs ( Tab. 10.2 ) Potential Capacity, Cp 1 Cp9- 1000 pcph (Fig. 10.3) Actual Capacity, Cm 1 Cm9mCp9- 1000 pcph azrata:rowarsaSaoraosrar&raarrrr&-aaaas000mmo arorrsaaaarrrs&rorrswa rarzaraasraz I STEP 2 LT From Mayor Street 1 v-- V4 smears.rmmr&ar-srmasrwaaamrmaarsrmrmaazrrorarraa s:aoormrosrrrm asrswrwaaarrr::ea Conflicting Flows, Vc 1 V3+V2- 48 + 118 - 166 vph(Vc4 ) Critical Gap, Tc 1 Tc- 4.S secs ( Tab. 10.2 ) Potential Capacity, Cp 1 Cp4- 1000 pcph (Fig. 10.3) % of Cp utilized and Impedance Factor 1 (V4;Cp4 ).,100- S% P4- 1 Actual Capacity, CM (Fil. 10.S ) 1 Cm4-Cp4- 1000 pcph jasrrsary"mrrarramrmraawarrmaamsssmarms-arrrmrraa&sra&rarwwararrmmmaaasrrsrrsaa: STEP 3 LT Front Minor Street -� V7 saa:aaaswrrraar&rrra smammas&r--w-raaoascrass&mrsrasmsmarsrasrsrroaaroasasra eros Conflicting Flows, Vc 1 1/2 V3+V2+VS+V4- 1 24 + 118 + S8 + 5 - 20S vph(Vc7 ) Critical Gap, Tc I Tc- 6 secs ( Tab. 10.2 ) Potential Capacity, Cp I Cpl- 791 pcph (Fig. 10.3 ) Actual Capacity, Cm I Cm7-Cp7xP4- 791 x 1 - 791 pcph waarssraasaraarr-srmrararmrraaaraawsmraaaasosrrwarraa&rrarraaraaroarr5sawsa&saa SHARED LANE CAPACITY SH - (V7+V9)i( (V7/Cm7)+(V9/Cm9) ) if lane is shared CR CR LOS LOS MOVEMENT V(PCPH ) CM(PCPH ) CSH(PCPH ) (CM-V ) (CSH-V ) CM CSH -emcee-mrs�easmraaroras�a��araarrsasr&rrsrsssrsasmrrmaaraaaaararrrarsaosrerars 7 26 791 840 765 804 A A 9 10 1000 840 990 804 A A 1 4 6 1000 995 A LOCATIOW GREENBURG 0 OAK !NAME+L.O.S.-REVISED EXIST ------ ------- HOURLY VOLUMES 1 OOLUMES IN PCPH Mayor Street C.E.SOUTH A , -:a..asnz__f saa s..saafzzfsa_aszsxa_ � rare_se-:.�xsaaa-:-ass=n:zsaxm:.n-:._:- rJ- V5- - 1•l ;rl ---VS-- Grade 359---Vtl v---V4--- lr 0: EO---V3---v N s -zaxaaaaaa:.aaczx 11 1 > woo...ls.a szzsvvss�xsaz-n��-_ Date of Counts ! 1 1 Y MAR. 1987 ! V7 V9 ! X STOP V9 Time Period: I ! I YIELD ! ! PM PEAK HOUR 1 191 1 20! Approach Speed: Minor Street Gratia 35 OAK 011; PHF! .8S Na 1 Population: 1000000 waarnnnaawaw.mamasaaw.maannwaaaaa.a.ss::amaa��zax„a:��=-zz-- _ _____ _ VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS - ------------------ ------- Mo'�ement no. ! 2 I 3 I 4 ! S 1 7 ---- --- - ---------------------------•------------------------ -- Volume ( vph ) I 6r9 ! 60 i 16 ! 1480 i 1 I -------------------------- , Vcl'pcph ),see Table 10. I ! xvxx ' —v ! q'vvxXXXX1 !7 IXXXXXXXXI Y afz:alawaasaawwa asawwaaalaaa�¢=-xaasra:alm.asaxxxaasaasQm:saaass�saxzaza.raamaa STEP 1 : RT From Minor St-ee' l9 xszssass!aa:z:axazszszxnxxax�_a_..=.a ._._,-a-._fa:xaz_saa_aa�ssaas-r.eaa:xas�axxxs=rx 1 Conflicting Flows, th 1 ;2 V3+'J2- 30 + 430 = 460 vph-;' .9 ) Critical Gap, Tc Tc- S secs ( Tab. 10.2 ) Potential Capacity, Co ! Cp9- 746 pcph (Fig. 10. 3) Actual Capacity, Cm I Cm9-Cp9- 746 pcph mass”......f.....ariasf.....as-xs.m*narzaxlaass.fa:anez::zazr:v-axsxsasxze x_r-sax= STEP '-T Fr-,r^ Ma),)r -====..r-=-=x=-==a fx=_aa3====Q=.........asa.----Qf=.a.............. QQ=xx Conflicting Flows, Vc I V3+V2- 60 + 8S9 919 vph(Vc4) Critical Gap, Tc 1 Tc- 5 se:s ( Tab.10.2 ) Potential Capacity, CP 1 Cp4- 435 pcph (Fig. 10.3 ) 1 X of CP utilized and Impedance Factor 1 (V4/Cp4 )x100- 3.9% P4- .98 Actual Capacity, Cm (Fig. 10.S ) I Cm4-Cp4- 43S pcph a a a!! -------------------- ------a a a--a--m--!a a n a a a a a m a a R n n n ---- --w z-n--a _ r STEP LT From Minor Street V7 asxz-aa!lwaannawaaQxlfmax-sass:szsaxz_snraas:zz..........al.-=........zm-xazoz Conflicting Flows, Vc 1 1/2 V3+V2+VS+V4- 1 30 + 859 + 1480 + 16 - 1700 ,ph(Vc1f ) Criticsl Gap, Te I Tc- 6.S secs (Tab. 10.2 ) Potential Capacity, Cp I Cpl- 85 pcph (Fig. 10.3 ) Actual Capacity, Cm I Cm7-Cp7x'P4- 85 .98 - 83 pcph arlaaaaraaansraaasaaraassanaasl.f lmalaaaawlaw--mlwas...fax.... -Q-annann--anew. SHARED LANE CAPACITY SH - eV7+V9 )/( (V7%Cm7 )+(V9%Cm9 ) ) if lane is shared CR CR LOS LO': MC'JEMEN7* V(FCPH ) CM(PCPH) CSH(PCPH ) (CM-V ) (CSH-V ) CM C-SH masa!:ala:saaawwsawaa!laasraaa sawlmw-Q-afal.a ma=mmas waasa:asarwlw.sl�::ff-q� /� 7 1 83 S 4 0 82 519 E (�/.1•pJr/y'/I li/ 9 20 746 S40 726 S19 A 14 4 17 435 418 A I Level of Service Calculations for REVISED EXISTING AND LINCOLN IV I 1 I I I I I 1 { f I I ------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- INPUT WORKSHEET I : Intersection:GREENGURG AT MAPLELEAF Date:APRIL 1987 f !Analyst :DPO/MEI TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK HOURArea Type: CBD XOtherl !Project N0.2BGS00 City/State: TIGARD, OR (REV.EXIST.+LINCOLN IV ) 1 _- -aaaasas=s=ccassosaxaaaosaaassaxsxasas-osaaasaasaa; xasxxxaaxxxs¢as....�s==__=-_ :VOLUME AND GEOMETFI;- -f�EENBURG N-S ST. ; ; [ 694 ) 12.0 ; ! 22 - [ 6'701 1 ! 12.0 ! 1210 1 -WB TOTALI (N > 29 b 4 3 231 RTH TH LT : 609 v I - ----- ----- - { -----------------! ! NORTH v v :v--LTH-12.0'-1 : v---LT-12.0'-1 1 ; 1 : IDENTIFY IN DIAGRAM 2-1.2.0'-RT---v ! I1 .Volumes ----------------- C < > ----------------- ' :2.Lanes, lane widths I LT LTH RTH 1 MAPLELEAF ! :3,Movements by lane 34 1 12.0 1 12.01 E/W STREET : ;4.Parking locations - ! 1 12.0 1 l 484 ! IS.Bay storge ingths [ S341 9 : 1 1 1 1 S02 87 ; 16. Islands E/B TOTAL - ! 1 [ 10731 : 17.©us stops v 491 ! 1 N/B TOTAL : ;TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS ssssaaassxsaaraaxxaxaasaaasaaxsxasasasaasaxs=asssata aasaaxxssssxssaaasaaaxxax :Ap:Grd. ! % HV : Ad,i .Pkg.Lane ! Buses 1 PHF :Cnf.Ped: Pedstrn Button: Arr. l 1prl (% ) I I Y/N 1 Nm ; (Nb ) 1 ; (pd/hr )l Y/N !Mn. -ime! Type: 2.0 ! N 1 0 : 0 : 0.90 : 10 ! Y : 18 ! 3 :WB!+0.01 2.0 ! N 1 0 0 1 0.90 : 10 1 Y 1 18 ; 3 1 !NB: +0.01 2.0 1 N 1 0 0 ; 0.90 ! 10 1 Y 1 18 : 3 1 !SB; +0.0: 2.0 , N 1 0 0 1 0.90 : 10 1 Y : 18 : 3 : : -------------------------------- - ---------------------------------------------I :Grade +up, -down Nb:buses stopping/hr Min. Timing: min.green for I !HV: veh. 4 whls PHF:pea� -hour factor pedestrian cr-,i ingl !Nm:pkg. aaneuvers/hr Cnf .Peds Crfictng Peds/hr Arr. Type: lype I-S : ' - ¢aa:�aaaxaaaxaaxaaraaaaa==.===:soi.as.ax-.xa=.a=oxsa:s>:nsmaesasaa==mss-x.¢a¢m= i -s :PHASING ' +sxaaasaasaz_=sr_e_cne=saa.-=esyssa=e-asaaa=as.o=oo=xmae==:araaasxssaa=ss...._asa� i 1 A : v 1 1 + I I I { ! 1 : G ! I I v I 1 I ! I l ; R ! M : 1000 • : : * 1 I I 1 : l I v • l ! v !Tim- 1 G= 23.21 Ga 26.71 Go 2S.21 Ga 2.91 Go 0.01 Ga 0.01 G- 0.01 Gs 0,01 1 Ing IY+Ra 3lY+R- 31Y+Ra 3:Y+R= 3!Y+R- 3! Y+R- 3!Y+Ra 31Y4-Ra IPtmd/Act ! A l A I A I A I I ------------------------••---------------------------------------------•--------1 I Protected turns! ****" 0000" I Permitted turns : ++++" I Cycle Length 90 Sec 1------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 I MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI i ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Intersection;GREENSURG AT MAPLELEAF Date;APRIL 1987 ; :Analyet :OPO/MEI TiMePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK HOURArea Type: CBD XOtherl :Project No,286500 City/State:TIGARD, OR (REV.EXIST.+LINCOLN IV) ; ' axmssasvx-:zzxc===xn3 z-z=xxnxnoxa;vx� xzaa=='==n ----- VOLUME AGJuSTMFNT WORVSHEET ! : 1 1 2 1 4 : S 6 l 7 3 - 9 =, 10 1Appr. 1 Mvt . 1 M. t Peal. ; Flow bane 1Flw rt :NuMberl Lane I Add . I Prop. : : 1 !Volume: Hour ; Rate Group :in Ln 1 of ;Utiliz; Flow 1 of I l ; 1 (vph ) !Factor: Vp !Grp Vp!Lanes IFctr,U1 V,vph1 LT or RT! 1 ! I 1 PHF 3%4 : ! ( vph ) 1 N ITb 9-41 7 . 9:Plt , Prt ! � xzaaalaasralazaxm_; _xx_=x; .aa==a� ao_i==� xmsasslauzaslmaaaaslzsmamalmamaammaa : 1 LT : ;4: 0.90 _78: 1 ! I 0.79 LT 1 : EB 1 TH 9! 0.90 101 C : 48: 1 1 1 .00 : 481 ; I RT 1 4911 0.90 : 54G1 0 ! 5461 ! 1 .05 : 5731 1.00 RT I : ----- 1 -----1------:------' _ : LT : 609: 0.90 ; 677: 1 ! f 0.91 LT 1 : W8 : TH 1 112: 0.90 1 241 I ! 744; 11 .05 : 78111 • 1 1 RT 1 39: 0.90 1 431 l 1 I ; : 0.06 RT 1 1 -----1 -----1 ------:------: ------1 ------1------'------1--- I 1 LT I 502: 0.90 ! 558! I 1 ! 1 : 0,47 LT I I NB : TH : 484: 0.90 1 S38! G : 1193! 3 1 1 . 10 l 1312 : 0 1 : 1 RT 1 87: 0.90 1 97: ! I I 0.08 RT I LT 1 23: 0.90 ! 26 : A : 261 1 l 1 .00 1 26 : 1 .00 LT ; : SB 1 TH l 643: 0.90 7141 N : 745: 2 1 1 .05 l .92: • : 1 RT 1 28: 0.90 1 311 1 ! 1 1 : 0.04 RT 1 1 -------------------------- ---------- :LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-1 ••• - PROTCTO, ++* = PERMTTO, 1t## - PROTCTO & oERMTTD1f ' ----------------------------------------------- 1 A 1 C 1 G l I 1 N l Q ; 1 1 • ; • 1 • : + 1 I l + I + I + l • 1 1 ; ! v i v I V ! v ; I -------------------------------------------------------- - ----- ------ --f I MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, usin9NCAP by PSI I --------------------------------------------------------------------------- A .--_----•------------------------------------------__------------------------------ : Intersection:GREENBURG AT MAPLELEAF Date:APRIL 1987 1 :Analyst :DPO/MEI TiMePerlod Anlyzd:PM PEAK; HOURArea Type; CBD xOther: :Project No.285500 City/State: TIGARO, OR (REV.EXIST.+LINCOLN IV ) 1 ==-saaiiassi isasaa=szaaxs=sem=sax.massaiasa.ssasssa.isi=iisaaisiiasisasasss mss; SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET lama=siissss.ss.=sssa.=as...mis=s....asiiaa.msiisiaiaais=isiaiiiaaaisaiisasa=il LANE : 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 1 10 1 11 : 12 1 13 GROUP: Ideal :No. :Ln.W. :HvyVeh!Grade I Pkg. !BU3Blk1AreaTp !Rt Trn1Lt Trn1AdjSat -----: Sat . !of : Fw 1 Fhv : FU 1 Fp I Fbb 1 Fa 1 Frt I Flt 1F1uIRt 1 : 21 Flow :Lnsl---- 1------1 ------1------1------: ------1------: ------I S Ap :Mv:pcphgp: N !T.9-5 :T.9-6 : T.9-7 1T.9-8 1T.9-9 1T.9-101T.9-ll :T.9-121 ( vphg) =a; asl .aRillYfsl=asses.lsrsisilaiisssliasisil uaiailii'siilaasiialaaiaailaasiia 1 I I I 1 1 1 I I EBI C1 1800 : 1 : 1 .0001 0.9901 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 0.9621 1714 1 QI 1000 1 2 1 1 .0001 0.9901 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 0.7501 1 .0001 2673 WB: 11 1800 : 1 1 .0001 0.9901 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 0.9911 0.9.10! 3251 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 NBI G! 1800 : 3 1 1 .0001 0.9901 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 0.9891 0.9761 5164 1 Al 1800 : 1 1 1 .0001 0.9901 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 0.9501 1693 SBI N1 1800 I '2 : 1 .000: 0.9901 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 0. 9941 1 .0001 3541 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I --------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- :LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[aaa - PROTCTD, ++4 - PERMTTD, fit# = PROTCTD & PERMTTDII 1--•--------------------------------------------------------------------- ------1 1 A 1 C 1 G l I 1 N : Q 1 I • ! • ! a : + ! { I 1 aaaa l aaaa; : aaaa; I aaaa; 1 aaaa; aaaa 1 I 1 ! ! I + i + : + I I I v l v { v 1 v 1 { I------------------------------------------------------------------------------: 1 MACKEN_IE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- I 1 j i i r ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - 1Intersection:GREENBURG AT MAPLELEAF Date:APRIL 1987 :Analyst :DPO/MEI TimePerlod Anlyzd:PM PEAK, HOURArea Type CBD XOther: !Project No.286500 City/State'TIGARD, OR (REV.EXIST.+LINCOLN IV) ; sa.ssazasasaaaaaaasaasaamasa...:saaasasasaeeaassasassassamaaesaaassasaa saaasa' I CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET 1 =aasa:saes.....saaasmesa...ae a:.axassa.aa.sssa a aaaasassamas.sasaaaaasasaa.s.1 (LANE GROUP 1 3 1 4 ; 5 1 6 7 ; 8 1 9 -----------I Adju3ted :Ad.Sat : Flow Ratio I Green :Ln.Grp! vJC !Crit . ; 1 I 2 1 Flow Rate :F1w.Rt1 1 Ratio :Capac. 1 Ratio 1 7 1 :Aper. :Mvmt . : v 1 s I v/s ; g / C 1c,vph 1 K (Lane 1 1 ; ( vph ) 1 ( vphg )1 3/4 1 1 4.,6 1 3/7 :Group ; lssssa! -aasalsas.a.aaaaa;saaaaa;aaeaaaaaeaaam maaalaasaaaale.rims,sasm--ale-mms 1 EB I C I 48 - 1 1714 1 0.028 - 1 0.033 1 56 0.857 : ••• 1 1 1 Q 1 573 - 12673 : 0.214 - ; 0.329 1 879 1 0.652 1 - 1 1 1 1-----------1 ------:-----------------1 -------1 ------1 -------1 -----1 1 I { I I ! 1 1 WB 1 I ; 781 - 1 3251 1 0.240 - 1 0.280 1 911 1 0.857 1 ••• ------ ' 1 I { 1 1 1 1 { I I i I NB : G 1 1312 - 1 5164 1 0.254 - : 0.296 1 1530 1 0.857 : ••f ; 1 -----1 -----1-----------1------1 ------ r 1 1 A I 26 - 1 1693 1 0.015 - 1 0.258 1 436 1 0.060 1 - ; 1 SB 1 N 1 782 - 1 3541 : 0.221 - 1 0.258 1 912 1 0.857 1 ••• 1 1----------------------------------------------------•-------------------------1 :Cycle Length- 90.05ec, Lost Time/Cycle,L- 12.0sec, S( v/s )ci- 0.743, Xc-0.8571 I-----------------------------------------------------------------------------: !LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[ ••• - PROTCTD, +++ a PERMTTD, ### - PROTCTO & PERMTT03 : 1 ------------------- •---------------------------------------•------------------I 1 A 1 C 1 G 1 I : N 1 Q I 1 •••r ; ♦�••� ; •«••; ; ••••) 1 ••••> ; •••r ; 1 ! I + 1 + I + 1 • : I 1 1 1 v 1 v 1 v I v 1 1 : -----------------------------------------------------------------------------I MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , rortland, OR, using NCAP by PSI 1 ------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------- IIntersectlon:GREENBURG AT MAPLELEAF Date:APRIL 1987 ; 1Analyst :DPO/MEI TimePeriod Anlvzd:PM PEAK HOURArea Type: CBD XOtherl !Project No.286500 City/State; TIGARD, OR (REV.EXIST.+LINCOLN IV ) ixxxxxaaxxxsaxaaaaaxaaasasa m.xsasaxaaaxaaaxaaaasaaaaaaaxmasaaaxaaaaaaasaaxma:aat I I LEVEL•-OF-SERVICE_WORKSHEET ! 1 First Term Delay I Second Term Delay !Tot -Delay-81-LOS LANE ! 3 ! 4 1 5 : 6 ! 7 1 8 ! 9 I 10 ! 11 : 12 : 13 GROUP! v/c ! Greens Cycle! Delay ! Lane! Delay :Prgrsn!Lane Gp : Ln! Apprch:Apr -----1 Ratio! Ratio:Length) dl !Group! d2 !Factor! Delay I Gp: Delay :LOS 1 12 ! X : /C 1 C : sec/veh:Ca ; sec/veh1LOS: 5ec/vehlTbl g p,clsec/veh. PF Ap:Mv : : 1 ( sec ) : 1 ( vph ): 1T.9-13! (6+8 )•9:9-1 : :9-1 =xinxtxxaaaaiaasaaalsaaaasta=aaaaaj-axaajaaasaaaiaaaaaalamaxrxxtxaal:maxaaataaa EBI C! 0.657: 0.0331 90.01 32.921 561 47.401 0.8S ! 68.281 F 1 21 .61 : r_ : Q! 0.652: 0.329: 90.0! 19.60! 879! 1 .22 : 0.8S 1 17.70! C 1 I ------ ------ -------- -------- I WBI I : 0.857: 0.2801 90.01 23.32! 9111 5.801 0.8S : 24.751 C 1 24.775: C I NBI G! 0.8571 0.2961 90.01 22.701 15301 3.641 0.85 1 22.391 C 1 22.391 C I A! 0.0601 0.258! 90.01 19. 15: 4361 0.001 1 .00 I 19. 15: C ! f SBI N! 0.8571 0.2581 90.01 24.201 S 5.791 0.8S : 25.49! D 1 25.281 D --------------•------------------------------------------------------------------ fIntersection Delay 23.44 sec/veh, Intersection LOS C Table 9. 1 : 1 ------------------------------------•-----------------------------------------: !LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[••• - PROTCTO, +++ - PERMTTD, ### - PROTCTO & PERMTTOII I-----------------------------------------------------------------------------1 I A I C 1 G I I I N I f + I • 1 • f + 1 I : I rrrr ! r•r•) ; •r••: ; rrrr,, 1 rrrr) 1 rrrr j ! I ! I + f + ! + 1 • I 1 I 1 1 v ! v ! v I v I 1-----------------------------------------------------------------------------: 1 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI : ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- � I --------------------- I INPUT WORKSHEET : Intersection GREENBURG @ HWY 217 SOUTH Date:APRIL 1987 Analyst DPO/MEI TimePeriod Anlyzd;PM PEAK HOURArea Type CBD KOtherl !Project No.286500 City/State: T:GARD, OR (REV.EXIST.+LINCOLN IV i a==-==ac.==asaasataaaaaaszxaaaaasazaaaaaaaazaaasasza-asasxaaaaaaaaa=a=-x=-=_ � ` LJ ME AND GEOMETRICS :GREENBURG N/S ST. : ( 12801 : I 0 SB TOTAL 1 ! 12.0 I : 0 [ 01 I v : 12.0 : -WB TOTAL: I (N ) 0 706 5741 TH LT 0 v 1 f III ----------------- ! NORTH v , : IDENTIFY IN DIAGRAM 1--12.0'-RT---v ' 1.Volumes ----------------- i1 ----------------- - !2.Lanes, lane widths 1 TH RT 1 HWY 217 RAMPS : 3.Movements by lane 421 : 12.0 ; : E/W STREET 14.Parking locations - ! 1 12.01 480 1 15.Bay storge ingths ( 6291 0 1 1 1 1 0 98 : 16. Islands E/6 TOTAL - I : ( 5781 : !7.Bus stops v 208 1 I N/B TOTAL : !TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS lasaaaaaasaaaaazaaaamsazasaaaxze=.,x==ox-v-e-------=--===-aaa----xsanaxaxxaaas{ ' !Ap:Grd. : % HV : Adj .Pkg.Lane : Buses I PHF :Cnf .Ped1 Pedstrn Button. Arr. 1 1pr- : ( ': )1 1 Y/N : NM : ( Nb ) : (pd/hr )! Y/N :Mn.Time: Type! IEB; +'-.O: 2.0 ! N ; 0 : 0 0.90 ; 0 1 N 1 0 1 3 1 IWB: +0.01 2.0 I N 1 0 1 0 1 0.90 1 0 1 N 1 0 1 S 1 1N8: +2.0: 2.0 1 N 1 0 ; 0 : 0.90 : 0 1 N 1 0 1 3 1 :SBI -2.0: 2.0 1 N 1 0 1 0 1 0.90 1 0 1 N 1 0 1 5 1 '------------------------------------------------------------ IGrade +up,-down Nb:buses stopping/hr Mln.Timing: min.green for 1HV: veh. , 4 whls PHF peak-hour factor pedestrian crossing: :Nm pkg.meneuvers/hr Cnf.Peds Cnflctng pads/hr Arr. Type: Type 1-S aaa=aaasamaaamxxaazaaaaassxazaaaaxam=saaso=s-=_=sa_-_---3s:aav_._:-_---- :PHASING ----_- _ ----_ __--_-- 1 1 I A 1 ! v I v I ! I 1 I , ! M : I ! v 1 I • ! 1 I { ! : Tim- : G- 0.01 G- 0.01 G- 0.0! Ga 0.01 G■ 0.01 Ga 0.01 G- 0.01 G- 0.0! I ing :Y+Rm OIY+R- OIY+R- O: Y+R- OIY+R- 01Y+R- 01Y+Ra 01Y+R- 0: 1-----1--------I--------I--------1--------I--------1--------l--------! I !Ptmd/Act ! A I A l A I I ! 1 ! ! I---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Protected turns: ••••^ 0000" 1 Permitted turns: ++++^ : Cycle Length 90 Sec : I----------------------•-------------------------------------------------------1 1 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI f -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : Intersection:GREENBURG @ HWY 217 SOUTH Date:APRIL 1987 1 Analyst :DPO/MEI TimePeriod An1yzd:PM PEAK HOURArea Type CBD XOtherl Project No.286S00 City/State: TIGARD, OR � REV.EXIST.+LINCOLN IV ) I VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORE:SHEET ---==zx=c=___-_acs=a=s=c=sasanxosazsaeassa_:=a=c===ass=s==n___z.s.sassxsxmz=sl 3 4 S 6 1 7 a 9 10 11 I , ;Aper. ; Mvt . 1 Mvt . Peak Flow : Lane :F1w rtlNumberl Lane 1 Adj . 1 Prop, 1 I 1 ;Volume: Hour ; Pate :Group ! in Ln 1 of !Utiliz! Flow 1 of ! : 1 1 ( vph ) ;Factor; Up : !Grp VglLanes 1Fctr,U1 V,vphl LT or RTI I ; PHF : 3/4 1 1 ( �ph ) I N :Tb 9-41 7 x 91P1t , Prt ! , =xaszls=asalas9axxl ==asaziaacsas -=-=.-= ===czaaaa'Oa= ==-_= 1 i - , , _ , =asassiasaasssss, 1 LT ; 4211 0.90 1 468; A 468; 1 ; 1 .00 468: 1 .00 LT 1 EB TH 1 01 0.90 ! 0; : 1 RT 1 208! 0.90 ! 2311 Q 1 .00 1 2311 1 .00 RT LT 1 01 0.90 ! 01 I ! 1 1 0.00 LT 1 j I W6 ; TH : 0! 0.90 1 0! 1 1 1 1 RT : 0! 0.90 ! 01 1 I I 1 1 0.00 RT 1 I j 1 1 LT 1 0! 0.90 ; 0! I 1 : 1 1 0.00 LT 1 1 1 NB ! TH ; 4801 0.90 i 53371 E S33! 1 11 .00 1 S331 • ! I ; RT 1 98! (0. 90 ! 109: 0 109! 1 ; 1 .00 1 1091 1.00 RT I 1 1 LT 1 S741 0.90 1 6381 A 6381 2 ; 1 .0S 1 6701 1 .00 LT 1 1 SB 1 TH ! 706! 0.90 1 784! E 7841 1 1 1 .00 : '7841 » I I 1 RT 1 01 0. 90 1 0! ! 1 : ! 1 0.00 RT 1 I ----------------------------------------------•------------------------------- ' !LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[*** a PROTCTO, +++ a PERMTTD, It*# a PROTCTD b PERMTTDII -----------•----- --------------------------------------------------------------! f A f E Q ! ! ' ! 1 ; Mr!♦ ! •affil ; ♦Nf♦ ! 1 1 I I 1 I -----------------------------------------------------------------------------! I MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI I ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- i : i i -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ; Intersection:GREENBURG @ HWY 217 SOUTH Date:APRIL 1987 :Analyst ;DPO/MEI TiMePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK HOURArea Type: CBD '[Other : :Project No.286500 City/State:TIGARD, OR (REV.EXIST.+LINCOLN IV ) ; asses--saes--asasaaaaaxsaasaaaass-asaa-sasaaassasoaaasasaaaasaaaaas-saga::amn; SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET smssa-aysea-aaasssssaar-asaaaaas-aaz-srrasaaaasaaaasa-aasassassaaa-same-assaa; I LANE : 3 4 : 5 1 6 1 7 I 8 : 9 1 10 1 11 : 12 : 13 GROUP! Ideal :No. :Ln.W. :HvyVeh!Grade 1 Pkg. IBusBlk1AreaTp:Rt Trn:Lt Trn!AdjGat -----1 Sat . :of 1 Fw 1 Fhv 1 Fg I Fp 1 Fbb ! Fa I Frt : Flt !F1wRt 1 : 2: Flow :Lns1------1------:------1------I------I ------I------:------' S Ap :Mv:pcphgp : N 1T.9-5 1T.9-6 1T.9-7 1T.9-8 :T.9-9 1T.9-10:T.9-111T.9-121 ( vphg) m-,as;assaas;aaa;assssslaaaass; s�saz-;saaasa;ssaaaalassaaalasssaa;asasa-; --axs- 1 A: 1800 : 1 1 1 .0001 0.990: 0.9901 1 .0001 1 .000: 1 .0001 1 .0001 0.950: 1676 i I I � I I 1 I : 0: 1800 1 1 1 1 .0001 0.9901 0.9901 1 .000: 1 .0001 1 .0001 0.850: 1 .000: 1500 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 WB! I I I NBI E1 1800 1 1 1 1.0001 0.9901 0.9901 1 .0001 1 .0001 1.000: 1 .0001 1 .0001 1764 : QI 1800 I 1 1 1 .000: 0.9901 0.9901 1 .000: 1 .0001 1 .0001 0.8501 1 .0001 1500 1 Al 1800 : 2 1 1.0001 0.9901 1 .0101 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 0.9201 3312 S81 E: 1800 : 1 1 1 .0001 0.9901 1 .01@I 1 .0001 1 .000: 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 1800 : I 1 1 : I : 1 I I 1 I -------------------------------------------•--------------------------- !LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-C•+• - PROTCTD, +++ - PERMTTO, #*# - PROTCTD b PERMTTOI : ' ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ' I l A I E 1 0 I I I 1 1 : { : v 1 1 I--------•-----------------------•------------------------- ---------------------: I MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI : ----------------•---------------------------------------•------------------------- i l --------------------------------- lIntersection:GREENBURG @ HWY 217 SOUTH Oate APRIL 1987 !Analyst :DPO/MEI TiMePeriod Anlyzd PM PEAK HOURArea Type CBD XOther; !Project No.28GS00 City/State; TIGARD, OR (REV.EXIST.+LINCOLN IV) ; -_---==_aamaas,a=saamammmaaamamaos.-xcsx=zaaxaaaama_exaooaxx=axoma=zx,aaamamm; SUPPLEMENTAL WORKSHEET FOR LEFT-TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR, fLT ; i xasaaaasaasaaammmaaamaaaasaamammaamoaaxsaaxssaavaaa=aammsaas_aa=,s=xo� { INPUT_VARIABLES/COMPUTATIONS ! EB WB, NB _a8_ ;Cycle Length, C ( sec ) ; ! !Effective Green, g ( sec ) , :Number of Lanes, N ; , ; Total Approach Flow Rate, Va( vph ) : !Mainline Flow Rate, Vm ( vph ) ; { :Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt ( vph ) :Proportion of LT, Pit ;Opposing Lanes, No ;Opposing Flow Rate, Vo ( vph ) :Prop. of LT in Opp. Vol . Pito !Sop = 1800No/( 1+Plto[ ( 400+VM ),atc. 1 :Yo Vo/Sop ; :Gu (g-CYo )/( 1-Yo ) ; { IFs (875-0.6&'5Vo )/1000 IPI Plt[ 1+(N-1 )g/(FsGu+4.S ) l :Gq = g - Gu ;Pt - 1 - P1 ; ! !Gf = 2Pt[ i-Pt"( .5Gq )1/P1 ;E1 - 1800/( 1400-Vo ) !FM = Gf/g + Gu/g + [ 1/( 1+P1 etc . : !Flt = (FM + N •- 1 )/N ; {-------•---- -------------------------------------------- ------ -----I ! MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, usingNCAP by PSI _ i lIntersection:GREENBURG @ HWY 217 SOUTH Date:APRIL 1987 ' !Analyst DPO/MEI TlmePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK HOURArea Type; CBD XOtherl !Project No.28GS00 City/State:TIGARD, OR (REV.EXIST.+LINCOLN IV) I CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET ; !!!!!!:!lxaxx_n._==a�nxaxa=oaxxaaxxaxxaxxax:aeras.oa=a!!a!!!as!!!!!!!!laax!!!a!1 ;LANE GROUP 3 4 S 6 1 7 I----- -1 Adjusted IAd.Sat ; F71oW Ratio I Green ;Ln.Grpl v/C ;Crit . ; 1 ; 2 ; Flow Rate 1F1w.Rtl 1 Ratio ;Capac. ; Ratio 1 7 ; 1Appr, !Mvmt . 1 v ; s ; '%s 1 g / C ;c,vph I X Lane I 1 ( vph) 1 ( vphg ); 3/4 ; 1 4�6 ; 3/7 ;Group ; 1 A 1 468 - 1 1676 49.,.'.''9 - ; 0.332 1 556 1 0.841 1 EB 11 ; I I - I I 1 Q 1 231 1 1500 0. 154 - 1 0.332 1 498 10.464 1 - ; 1 -----; -----I-----------I------ - ----------------1 -------' I I I 1 1 1 I 1 WB I I I I ' I-----; -----' ------ f I I I I I NB E I S33 - ; 1764 0,302 - 1 0.360 63S ; 0,839 I 109 - 1 1500 ; 0.073 - 10.360 1 540 ; 0.102 1 - 1 I-----1-----1-----------'- --- I ; A 1 670 - 3312 0.241 1 798 0.839 1 A«• I 1 S8 1 E 1 784 - 1800 1 0.436 - 10,6.34 1141 10.687 1 1 1 ------------------------ ;Cycle Length= 90.Osec, Lost Time/Cycle,L= 6.05ec, S( v/s )ci- 0.784, Xc=0.8401 I--------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------- ;LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[ Aaa = PROTCTO, +++ - PERMTTD, ##* - PROTCTO & PERMTTDl1 i----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 A 1 E f ' AAAA 1 •AAA) ; sawA I i I-------------------------------------------------------- ----- y I MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP b PSI I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I t I 1 F ------------------ •------------------------------------------------------------- : Intersection:GREENBURG @ HWY 217 SOUTH Date:APRIL 1987 :Analyst �DPO/MEI TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK HOURArea Type: CBD XOtherl :Project No.Z86500 City/State TIGARD, OR ( REV.EXIST.+LINCOLN IV ) loxiassass-amasaaaaasamasaa=aso.:a==.aa=mzaaaaamaamsaasaaasammmmmarasmasaaamma; LEVEL-OF-SERVICE-.WORKSHEET :_ _ First Term Delay : Second Term Delay ;Tot .Oelay_8_L05 LANE ; 3 1 4 : S ; 6 1 7 1 8 : 9 : 10 GROUP; v/c : Green: Cycle; Delay : Lane! Delay :PrgrsnlLane Gp: Ln; Apprch;Apr ---- Ratio: Ratio:Length: dl ;Group; d2 ;Factor; Delay : Gpl Delay :LOS 1 I 2 I f X 1 g/C 1 C : 5ec/veh1 :Cap,clsec/vehl PF sec/vehILOS1sac/veh: Tbl Ap:Mv: l 1 ( sec ) l 1 (vph )1 :T.9-13; (6+8 )x9: 9-l1 : 9-1 �aias,sasssa;asaass;amaammlaamaaavtsasmslaasaammiaasssa;smaasaslasa�aaasmsalaaa A: 0.8411 0.3331 90.0: 21 . 151 SSG: 7.76 : 1 .00 l 218.921 D 1 l I l ^ 1 I I I I I 1 I 24.56: ly 1 Q: 0.4641 0.333: 90.0: 18.01 : 498: 0.51 : 0.85 1 15.7SI C 1 l I I 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 I WB: 1 : I 1 l : l l ; l 0.00: NB; E: 0.839: 0.000: 90.01 34.201 6351 6.821 0.9S 1 34.87: D 1 33.891 D 1 Q1 0.2021 0.0001 90.0: 34.01 5401 0.03: 0.85 : 29.091 D I I : Al 0.839: 0.2411 90.01 24.701 798: 5.59: 1 .00 : 30.91 D 1 I SB: El 0.6871 0.241 : 90.01 23.61 : 1141 : l .'9131 0.50 l 12.421 B I 20.661 C l : I : : ; : : ; { I : -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ! Intersection Delay 24.67 sec/veh, Intersection I-OS C Table 9. 1 1 I--------•---------------------------------------------------------------------I :LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-lxxx - PROTCTD, ,++ - PERMTTO, ### = PROTCTO a PERMTTDII : -----------------•------------------------- l A I E : Q l f 1 l xxx♦ ; xxxx> I xxxx ; I 1 ' I : -----------------------------------------------------------------------------1 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I -------------------------•-- ----------------- INPUT WORKSHEET : Intersection:GREENBURG Q HWY217 NORTH Date:APRIL 1987 (Analyst :OPO/MEI TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAR HOURArea Type: CBD XOther ! (Project No.2v"6500 City/State: TIGARO, ;;R ( REV.EXIST.+LINCOLN IV ) lasssassxoassssaasxsassssmasssmas ........... 1 !VOLUME AND GEOMETRICS ;GRE[PJBIJRG Ni 5 ;t. •gp`jo R�'orZ [ 11681 1 qil KEO�C T10r`� ! SB TOTAL : 1 ! ! ; `10 v > : 1 12.0 -WB ToTAI- ; (N) a 81 1087 01 RT TH I 205 v ------ ------------------ : NORTH RT-12.0'-1 1 1 ( IDENTIFY IN DIAGRAM ^ I1 .Volumes ----------------- _ _ '2.Lanes, lane ,.jidths ; LT TH 1 HWY 217 RAMPS :3.Movements by lane 0 1 12.0 1 : E/W STREET :4.Parki ng locations - : 1 12.0! 483 :5,Bay storge ingths [ 01 - 0 1 1 : 205 0 :6. Islands C/9 TOTAL ' � [ 6881 ! :7-Bus stops 0 ; N,'B TOTAL I ;TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIONS I ;sasasaaasssssasaassmssmaxxxsa==x==c=x====ax=_==-nx=x=xxx= =s-aaxsaaasas--s-mas; :Ap !Grd. 1 % HV ; Adj .Pkg.Lane : Buses FHF !Cnf.Ped! Pedstrn Button! Arr. 1 r fpr! ( ,". ) : I Y/N : Nm ( rJb 1 (pd/hr ): Y/N 1Mn. Time; Type; 1EB: +0.0: 2.0 1 N 1 0 0 0.90 ; 0 : N I 0 1 5 1 1W8:+0.01 2.0 1 N 1 0 0 0.90 ! 0 N 1 0 1 3 1 ;NB: +0.0; 2.0 1 N 0 0 1 0.90 1 0 N 1 0 1 4 1 158; +0.01 2.0 1 N ; 0 0 1 0.90 : 0 N 1 0 ; 3 1 I-------------------------------------- --------------- I 1Grade: +up,-down Nb:buses stopping/hr Min.Timing min.green for -1 !HV: ,/eh. 4 whls PHF:peak-hour factor pedestrian grossing; lNm:pl.g.maneuvers/hr Cnf .Peds :Cnflctng peds;hr Arr. Type: Type Imsa=asssmsmsax=n=sax sax_-=x===no=xsaxxsasxaa-asxxaaxx=aaax=-a-a-_--__=--ansa; !PHASING - - - 1 D ! I ! »a ; •»•» » ; 1 A ! v I » I ! ! ! I G 1 1 R 1 l ! I 1 A ! �• 1 • ! ! I I ! ; I M l • ; w ! 1 I : I ;Tim- ; GR 0.01 Ga 0.01 Ga 0.01 Ga 0.01 G- 0.01 G- 0.01 G- 0,01 G■ 0.0: -ing IY+Ra OIY+Ra 0!Y+Ra OIY+R- 3!Y+R- 31Y+R■ 31Y+R= 31Y+Ra J; :Ptmd/Act : A ! A ! q -- 1 Protected turns: ****" 0000" 1 Permitted turns ++++ : Cycle Length90 Sec ; 1------------------------------------------ ! MAChENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI ! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ; Intersection:GREENBURG @ HWY1217 NORTH Date:APRIL 1987 :Analyst :DPO/MEI TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK HOURArea Type: CBD XOther; !Project No.286500 City,'State. TIGARD, OR (REV.EXIST.+LINCOLN IV ) �aasssaassasxxxxxsaxxssasxszxaaasssssaaxaazaria:azaszsaasszasasxaasasazzaszzss� VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET ''ism_azszaazxaxxaaaasazasaaaazaaxxa:.eamasazazazxaaasasassaa:rasa aasassaassa¢.s, ! 1 ! 3 4 ! 5 ! 6 ; 7 ; 8 ; 9 10 IAppr. ; M,.t . ; Mvt . Peak 1 Flew 1 Lane ;Flw rt ;Number; Lane I Adj . 1 Prop. ; ;Volume; Hour ; Rate !Group : in Ln ; of ;Utillz ; Flow 1 Of I ! ( vph ) ;Factor; Vp I ;Grp Vg!Lanes !Fctr,U; V,vph! LT or RTI PHF ; 3/4 ; ; ( vph ) I N ; Tb 9-4; 7 9;Plt , Prt ; Ia=ass; aaasxlaxaaaslsaxsaa�sssssalssasss;zsasaa�aasass�asasas�zssass;ssaassaas� I LT ; 0; 0.90 ! 01 I ; I 10.00 LT 1 EB TH 0' 0.90 ! 0; ! ; ; ; ; # RT 01 0.90 0; ! I I ; 0.00 RT LT ; 205; 0.90 I X28; A ; 228; 1 ; 1 .00 ; 2281 1 .00 LT ! WB TH ; 0; 0.90 ; 0; ; I I ; » RT ; 11981 0.90 ; 331 ; Q ; 3311 1 ; 1 .00 1 331 ; 1 .00 RT 1 { I 1 LT I 2051 0.90 ; Xd. A 1 21.8; 1 1 1 .00 ! 228 1 .00 LT 1 ! NB ! TH 1 4831 0.90 ; 5371 E ! 5371 1 ; 1 .00 I 537; # 1 RT 1 01 0.90 ; 01 I ! ; I 0.00 RT 1 I 1 LT ! 01 0.90 ; 0; ; I ; I 0.00 LT 1 SB I TH 1 1087; 0.90 1 1208: E ; 12081 11 .05 ; 1268; » RT ! 81 ; 0.90 1 901 Q 1 90! 1 1 1 .00 ; 90; 1 .00 RT l ---------------------------------------------------------------------•----- !LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-I ### x PROTCTD, +++ x PERMTTD, it&# a PROTCTO & PERMTTDI ; I------------------------------------------------------------------------- I ---- � 1 A ; E I Q I I 1 I I # I 1 1 1 ! V ! 1 1 ----.- -----------------------.--.------------_--.--------.------.--------_--.-------- 1 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI 1 ) ) -----------------------•------- 1Intersection:GREENSURG @ HWY317 NORTH Date:APRIL 1987 IAnalyst :DPO,'MEI TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK; HOURAree Type: CBD XOtherl ;Project No.,186500 City/State; TIGARD, OR (REV.EXIST.+LINCOLN IV ) ; asaasasaaaaxaasaamssasssaaaaasxaaxaaaasaasamsawsaaasaxasaaaaassaasaaassaaxssx; SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET ; ; xsxassassaaasxxasssaaaaasassa:aasaaaasaaaaaasaaasaasasaxsasaaaamaaaasaasaas.x; LANE ; 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 8 I 9 ; 10 1 11 1 12 1 13 GROUP; Ideal 1No. 1Ln.W. 1HvyVeh;Grade ; Pkg. IBusBlk :AreaTp :Rt Tr-nlLt Trn;AdjSat -----1 Sat . :of 1 Fw ; Fhv 1 Fg ; Fp ; Fbb I Fa Frt 1 Flt ;F1wRt 1 ; "I Flow ;Lns1------;------1------1------' ------'------' Ap;Mv ;pcphgp; N 17.9-5 1T.9-6 IT.9-7 ;T.9-8 IT.9-9 ;T.9-10; T.9-1117.9-1"1 ( vphg) ¢a;aa; saasaa;aaa;saaaxa;saaaaa;aasaxa;ssssss;sa:aaa;asaasa;saa aiaa;assasa;masaaa EB' 1 A; 1800 1 1 1 1 .000; 0.9901 1 .0001 1 .000; 1 .0001 1 .000, 1 .000; 0.950; 1693 WBI ; 1 1 I ' I Q; 1800 ; 1 1 1 .0001 0.9901 1 .0001 1 .000; 1 .0001 1 .000; 0.8501 1 .0001 1515 AI 1800 1 1 1 1 .0001 0.990; 1 .000; 1 .000; 1 .0001 1 .000; 1 .000; 0.9501 1693 NB: E; 1800 ; 1 1 1 .0001 0.9901 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 1782 1 1 I 1 SB; E; 1800 1 1 1 .000; 0.9901 1 .0001 1 .000; 1 .0001 1 .000, 1 .000, 1 .0001 3564 -Qi -1800 1 1 1 1 .0001 0.9901 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 1 .0001 0.8501 1 .0001 1515 ----------------------------- ;LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-1 »»» a PROTCTD, +++ x PERMTTD, ### z PROTCTO S PERMTTOII !------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ 1 A E Q I ' ; 1 1 ---------------------------------- I ------------------------------------ 1MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI __------- ; --------------------------------------------------- I r ___________._-- -_______""--_----_--_-- lIntersection:GREEN6URG ® HWY217 NORTH Date APRIL 1987 :Analyst :DPO/MEI TimePeriod Aniyzd PM PEAK HOURArea Type_ CBD XOther !Project No.286500 City;'State: TIGARD, OR (REV.EXIST. +LINCOLN I'1 ; ,sa=rasac.mx:nas��as=mzv-=s=sasszmsnssessz=3a=:sa.mvxxaezas=mazoannzm caeossmms, SUPPLEMENTAL wORh'SHEET FOR LEFT-TURN ADJU:TMENT FACTOR, FLT lsm==ac..ssss=aomoas�snsszs�=ru=smsos=oom=sans=naay.a=massa maa=ass e: cavus .___ , ! INPUT_VARIABLES/COMPUTATIONS EB w8 ! rlB __ 6 II :Cycle Length, C ( sec ) ; :Effective Green, g ( sec ) ! !Number of Lanes, N I ; !Total Approach Flow Rate, Va( vph ){ ; ;Mainline Flow Rate, Vm ( vph ) ! ; ;Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vit (vph ) I ; ;Proportion of LT, Pit !Opposing Lanes, No I ! I !Opposing Flow Rate, Vo ( vph ) Prop. of LT to Opp. Vol . Pito I !Sop 1800N,, ( I+Plto[ ( 400+Vm )etc. 1 ! Yo Vo/Sop ! I ! I ! :Gu (g-CYo )/( 1-Yo > !Fs (875-0.625Vo)/1000 :P1 Pit[ 1+(N-1 )g/(F5GU+4.5 )1 : I ! ! :Gq a g - Gu I I I I { 4 IPt 1 - P1 I ! ! ! ! !Gf s 2Ptf1-Pt"( .5Gq )1/Pi I :E1 = 1800/( 1400-Vo ) ! IFm = Gf/g + Gu/g # [ 1/( 1+P1 etc. I ! ! :Flt s ( Fm + N - 1 )iN I ! 1------------------------------------..------------------------------•--------- ! MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, u31ng NCAP by FSI ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- i I i i i I ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- ; Interaection;cREENBURG @ HWY217 NORTH Date;APRIL 1987 1 st ;Ar,alyst OP0/MEI TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAS, HOURArea Type CBO XOtherl ;Project No.2BGS00 ty, State: TIGARD, OR REV.EXI;T.+LINCOLN IU) 1 a-zaa asaa.... CAPACITY ANALY'D-I; WORD SHEET ', aas.asa:raaaxcxs==s==ca-=aa=x3oasaa=a===_.ca=as==_'x-==--=s=s=aasaaasssassasaa=� LANE GROUP 3 5 5 8 ; 9 f ---------- Adjusted ;Hd. ,at Flow ratio Green ILn.Grp; v1C ;Crii , 1 2 1 Flow Rate IF1w.Rt ; Ratio ICapac. ; Ratio 1 v ;Appr, ;Mvmt . 1 v ; s y / C Ic,vph ; X ;Lane 1 ( vph ) ; ( .,phg ) 4 4,.6 3!7 ;Gr-oup =vszcc ^s-as-szecss oaasss_ iasasas; oa=a=aa�aazmai EB ; ; ; ----------- ' --- ' ----------------- ; -------; ------ -------; -----' A 1 1693 1 0. 135 - ; 0.268 ; 488 ; 0.468 1 - WB ; Q 1 331 - 1 1516 0.219 - 1 0.288 1 436 ; 0.759 1 ��► - ---; -----I -----------I----- ' -----------------'------- ------ ------- A A 1 228 - 1 1693 ; 0. 135 - ; 0. 178 ; 301 1 0.757 1 N•� NB E 1 537 11782 ; 0.301 - 1 0.680 ; 1212 1 0.443 1 - I 1 { 1 --------'------- ------'-------' -----' ; SB ; E ; 1268 - 1 3564 ; 0. ;56 - 0.468 1668 1 0.760 1 N+N 1 Q 1 90 - 1 1515 ; 0.059 - 0. 468 709 1 0. 127 ----------------------------------------------------------- - -------------------1 Cycle Length- 90.0sec, Lost Time/Cycla,L= 6.05ec , 0.709, Xc=0.7601 ' -----------------------------------------------------------------------------1 LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[NNN - PROICTD, +++ = PERMTTD, #t# = PROTCTO 6 PERMTTD] 1 -----------------------------------------------------------------------' A E I Q I 1 I I •NN• ; NiNNj 1 NNNN 1 � i N I I v I I -----------------------•-----------------------------------------------------i MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. , Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI ! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ : Intersection=GREENBURG @ HWY217 NORTH Date:APRIL 1987 ; ;Analyst DPO/MEI TimePericd Anlyzd PM PEAK; HOURArea Type; CBO XOther : :Project No.286500 City/State: TIGARO, OR ( REV.EXIST.+LINCOLN IV ) ; � sxaasaxxaxssaazzsxszsassassasazaaaaassmaaaxaxxmaassazaaaaasaaazaaazzazsamsasxa; LEVEL-OF-SERVICE_WORKSHEET ; : First Term Delay I Second Term Delay : Tot .Celay-&_LOS LANE : 3 4 5 : 6 ; 7 8 9 : 10 11 ; 12 ; 13 GROUP: v;c Green: Cycle: Calay I Lane: Delay :Prgrsn:Lana Gp: Ln; Apprch:Apr -----' Ratio: Ratio:Length; dl :Group ; d2 ;Factor; Delay ; Gp; Delay LOS 1 ! 2: X : g/C I C ; sec/veh:Cap,c : sec/veh; PF : sec/veh:LOS: sec/veh: Tbl Ap:MvI ; ; ( sec ); : (vph): : T. 9-131 (6+8 )*9:9-1 : : 9-1 �s� sa� aaaaxx;xxaaxxiaaaazs; aaasazaixzaaa!assssaa�maxszs; aaazazz;asa;ssazsss;sss I EB: : : : : ; : : ; ; 0.00: + A: 0.468: 0.288: 90.0; 20.05; 488: 0.54: 1 .00 ; 20.SSI C : WB: : : : : : : : ; : : 22., 1a: C : Q: 0.759: 0.288: 90.0: 22.20: 436: 5. 15: 0.85 ; 23.28: C ; ------ ------- ----- ------- 1 1------1 I -------I I I : A: 0.757: 0.177: 90.0: 26.73: 301 : 7. 12 : 1 .00 ; 31.!.86 : D : I NBI E: 0.443: 0. 17 90.0; 25. 12 : 1212: 0. 1.8: 0.62 : 15.69: C : 21 .10: C 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 i 1 I I I I I I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I �,B : E: 0.760: 0.000: 90.0: 34.20: 1668; 1 .47: 0.85 I 30.32: D : 30.24; D I Q: 0. 127: 0.000: 90.0: 34.20: 709; 0.00; 0.85 ; 29.07; D : : ; Intersection Delay 25.95 sec/veh, Intersection LOS D Table 9. 1 : i----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS-[ *** - PROTCTO, +++ a PERMTTD, 444 a PROTCTO 8 PERMTTDII ' --- ----------------------------------------------------------------------' : A : E : Q � NNAA NAAAj ; NAAN ; : v : MACKENZIE ENGINEERING, INC. . Portland, OR, using NCAP by PSI ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - i : LOCATION:GAK @ 95TH ;NAME:L .O.S.-EXIST+LINC. IV HOURLY VOLUMES 1 VOLUMES IN PCPH N ; Major street ;OAK ; sassaaaaa!assn===---^--==vc=xxax<===xaa ; Manamaaaxx=a sass N= 1 ---V5--- 66 1 ---t;5--- Grade 141---'J: --- v---V4--- S ' --- 0k ---V3---v a=axxaaaasaanasaa ( ; 1i laaaasaaa: � aas:axa=axx=====a ;I I � ----________ Date of Counts: 1 I 1 I - MAR. 1987 V7 V9 1 x STOP 1 V7 V9 1 Time Period: 1 1 1 1 YIELD 1 I ; PM PEAK HOUR 1 ZS 101 1 1 25 101 Approach Speed Minor Street Grade 25 95TH 07. PHF: .85 N= 1 Population: 1000000 xa=a xxsxx_axx=xaaass=aza a_._aaax= aaxo=====a_==_ a===xaasxzas=aa=.x=x==xz=xx== ' VOLUME ADJUSTMENT; Movement no. ! 4 1 5 1 7 g ------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------- Volume ( vph ) 1 141 1 48 1 S 66 I 2S 1 10 ---------------------------------•------------------------------------------------ Vol(pcph ),see Tabie 10. lIXXXXXXXXIXXXXXXXXI 5 'XXXXXXXXI 2S 10 a==nzxsacxax=vnxaxaxaxsaazaxaxacaae==axxa-c=o==a=caaxxxaz=aaxa= _= aaaaxa====ac STEP 1 R1 Frim Minor Street V9 Conflicting Flows, Vc 1 C V3+l,2= 24 + 141 = 155 vph(VC9 ) Critical Gap, Tc 1 Tc= 5 secs iTab. 10., ) Potential Capacity, Cp Cp9= 1000 pcph Fig. 10.3) Actual rapacity, Cm CM9=Cp9= 1000 ocph STEP 2 l-T From Major Street v-- V4 xvzxaasamaasa=xznsasazxaaa_nxxax =xx=a==nzaaaaaaaxaalaaxasnaxcxaa=zxxaxax==-= Conflicting Flews, Vc V3+V;;a 48 + 141 = 189 vph(Vc4 ) Critical Gap, Tc I Tc! 4.5 secs ( Tab. 10.2 ) Potential Capacity , Cp I Cp4n 1000 pcph (Fig. 10.3 ) % of Cp utilized and Impedance Factor 1 (V4/Cp4 )AI00= S% P4= 1 Actual Capacity , Cm ( Pig. 10.5 ) Cm4aCp4- 1000 pcph STEP LT From M1ncr Street -\ V7 aasxsasaaaasaxsxx=x----zazr=roa=nrx=aasaxaxaac==xax=xeaaaasaaax==e=s==x=cxc _--- Conflicting Flows, Vc 1 1i,' 'J3+V,+VS+V4= 1 24 + 141 + 66 + 5 = 236 vph( 1,1c7 Critical Gap, Tc 1 Tc- 6 secs ( Tab. .10. 2 ) Potential Capacity, Cp 1 Cpl= 763 pcph ( Fig. 10.3 ) Actual Capacity, CM rm7=Cp7�P4= 763 I = 763 pcph SHARED LANE CAPACITY -iH = ( V7+V9 )/( ( V7/Cm7 )+(V9/Cm9 ) ) if lane is shared CR CR LOS LOS MOVEMENT V( F(-FH ) CM(PCPH ) C':�H(PCPHI (CM-V ) (CSH-V ) CM CSH =_a.==nxx__=x=ax_ xzcaxaaaxxaaasx=.casaaae=a_xa--masa=zaazcaxcaazaac=e=x=_saax 25 "763 818 738 783 A A 9 10 1000 818 990 783 P. A 4 5 1000 99S A It LOCATION HALL (a OAK NAME L.O.S. -EXIST+LINC. IV _ HOURLY VOLUMES Grade 0% I N 1 1 62 i V12 1 1 U11 1 i I Z0 I i V10 V30 �© Grade 0% ----------V5-- 486 N= 1 47 --V1- ---- -- - ----------V4-- 34 4;8 --V�------------- major road Grade 0% 11 - 'J3----------- : i HALL ==x33axxxxxara=xa...=xx V7 I I saxxaaacxxaxaa=xa==x== I 19 1 1 1 STOP U9 1 1 YIELD I N= 1 35 1 1 Date of Counts MAR. 1987 I V9 1 Time Period:PM PEAK HOUP minor road 94 1 Prevailing Speed:35 I OAK I PHF .8S Grade! 0 % I Population 75000 _xaxxaa==xaa=a==x3==�-xx=-x====xxa=a:s=a=nm aaasaxxxsaa:==z3x:==aasaa:.aa a VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Movement no. 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 : 5 1 6 7 : 6 1 9 10 1 11 : 12 1 - Volume ( vph ) 1 471 438: 111 341 4861 301 191 351 94: 301 77-: 621 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vol(pcph ),Tab. 10. 11 491XXXXIxuXX : 35IXXXXIXXXX : 191 3S1 94: 301 321 621 Sx3xxaa=sx3sxaxx33-o_=_x__3=xnxa333_nn=xxaaaaaaaz aaaazaaaaaaaxzaaaaaaxxaasaasaa VOLUMES IN PCPH I I I V12 I i V11 i 1 i 1 30 1 I V10 aaaa.asazzaaaaaxzaaxx t1 v ii ^-----------V6-- ----------VS-- -- 49 --V1-------- ---" v----------U4-- 35 ra -------------- -(.)3-------------v ----------- -V3-------------v 19 I 1 V8 35 I 1 V9 I 94 L -- LOCATIOW HALL @ OAK NAME. L.O. S. -EXIST+LINC. IV ar sraf Gams==xssss=scxzs=r= _-___-. STEP 1 RT From Mlncr Street /- J9 -i V1:1 . s saaa,er:'zasaxa =axzs=_=n== ConPltcting Flouts, Vc 1 1.'C V3+V2-Uc9 ; I "_' VS+t,'S=Vc1C 6+ 438- 444 vph ; 1S+ 486- S01 vph Critical Gap, Tc ( Tab. 10.2 ) S.S ( secs. ) ; S.S ( secs. ) Potential Capacity,Cp(Fig10.3 ) I Cp9 = 667 pcph ; Cp12 - 624 pcph i of Cp utilised ; ( 1J9/Cp9 )• 100- 14. 1%. 1 (V12/Cp12 ).•100- 9.9% Impedance Factor, P (Fig. 10.S : ; P9= .91 I P12- .94 Actual Capacity, CM Cm9=Cp9- 667 pcph 1 Cml2=Cp12- 624 pcph xaszszs=zzazxx=sx====xxx=a=x=====xr.=va-----^---a===_---=s=m:mxx=aaaaaassaaaaaa STEP 2 LT From Major- Street v-- V4 - V1 :msaarra:alms=zzmszszzzzsxzzrxazsmsssaaassmsssaaaassasass-ssa_asz-a:a:m=axx=x=:x Conflicting Flows, Vc 1 V3+V2-Vc4 I V';+VS-Vcl 111+ 438= 449 ,ph 1 30+ 486= 516 ph Critical bap, Tc ( Tab. 10.2 ) 1 5 ( secs. ) 1 5 ( secs. ) Potential Capacity,Cp(Fig10.3 ) 1 Cp4 - 756 pcph 1 Cpl = 697 pcph % of Cp utilized 1 (V4/Cp4 ),.,100= 4.6 1 (V1/Cpl )• 100= 7" Impedance Factor, P (Fig. 10.5 ) 1 P4- .97 P1= . 96 Actual Capacity, Cm 1 Cm4-Cp4= 7S6 pcph Cml=Cpl= 697 pcph STEP 3 fH From Minor Street X18 v V11 zxs_z a._zxzx ax_===x_=x==xx aa.._=-oxm:aaxxxx====a =azzszaaaaaar.x-_xm=aaazzsaxzs== Conflicting Flows, '.' : .5V3*VZ+V1+V6�1)S+V4=Vc81 .SV6+VS+V4+VJ7+Q'&+V1=VcII 1 6+ 438+ 47+ 30+ 1S+ 486+ 34+ 11+ 1 486+ 34- 1041 vph 1 438+ 47= 1031 vph Critical Gap, Tc ( Tab. 10.2 ) 1 6 ( secs. ) ; 6 ( secs. ) Potential Capaclty,Cp( Fig10.3 ) 1 Cp8 - 259 pcph 1 Cpll - 263 pcph % of Cp utilized I (V8/Cp8 )x100- 13.57. 1 (V11/Cpll )AIOO- 8.4% Impedance Factor, P ( Fig. 10.S ) 1 P8- .91 1 P11- .95 Actual Capacity, Cm 1 Cm8-Cp8xPlAP4 ; Cmll-Cp11xP1xP4 1 241= ZS9x.96x.97pcph 1 245- 263x .96...97pcph STEP 4 LT From Minor Street - V7 V10 =sx=zza=s=zxs=-zsc-saaaxzxza =a=zaxaaa=xsaasaazxxaz-sx^===szaazx= xzcaszs-zsxx= Conflicting Flows, is 1 VcG( step3 )+V11+V12=Vc7; Vcll( step3 )+V8+V9-Vc10 1 1041+ 22+ 62- 1125vph ; 1031+ 3S+ 94- 1160vph Critical Gap, Tc ( Tab . 10.2 ) 1 6.5 ( secs. ) ; 6.S ( secs. ) Potential Capacity,Cp(Fig10.3 ) 1 Cpl = 193 pcph CpiO - 182 pcph Actual Capacity, Cm 1 Cm7-Cp7xP1xP4xP11xP12 ; Cm10=Cp10xP4AP L.PB09 1 - 193x.96s.97x.95x.94 I 182,..97n .96x .91x.91 1 160 pcph 1 = 140 pcph LOCATIOW HALL ® OAK NAME L.O.S.-EXIST+LINC. IV SHARED LANE CAPACITY APPROACH MOVEMENTS 7,8,9 CR CR LOS LOS MOVEMENT V(PCPH ) 1:M( PCPH) CSH(PCPH ) (CM-V) (CSH-V ) CM CSH caaalas=aasaassasa=====__==-==aa==xv=cs.aoa=ac=v==�=a.asa=o=asaa_=csaa=o=====m 7 19 150 366 141 '18 0 C 8 35 241 366 206 -118 9 94 667 356 573 C18 r, C APPROACH MOVEMENTS 10, 11 , 12 CR CR LOS LOS MOVEMENT V( PCPHCM(PCPH ) CSH(PCPH ) (CM-V ) ( CSH-V > CM CSH !0 0 140 283 110 169 0 0 ll 245 X83 113 163 C U 1� 6� 624 :B3 562 169 A 0 MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS 1 ,4 MOVEMENT 'J(PCPH ) CMl PCPH > CR(CM-V ) LOS 1 a9 69 648 A 4 COMMENTS i LOCATION k-7FEENBURG @ OAK 1NAME:L.O.S. -EXIST+LING IBJ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- HOURLY VOLUMES 1 VOLUMES IN PCPH N, ; Mayor street G.B. SOUTH I - -..JS--- Grade 0!: I.IS---V3---v N- 4 1 ---V3---v Date of Counts I 1 1 1 I I 1 I MAR. 1987 + V7 V9 I X STOP 1 I V7 V9 1 Time Period! 1 1 1 YIELD I ! I 1 1 PM PEAK HOUR 1 1 381 1 I 1 381 Approach Speed: Minor Street : Grade 1 �5 OAK 0% PHF: .85 Na I Population 1000000 VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS Movement no. 1 2 1 3 4 1 S 1 7 1 9 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume ( vph ) 1 874 1 105 1 16 1 1782 1 1 i 38 ' ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vol(pcph ), see Table 10.IIXXXXXXXXIXXXXXXXXI 17 1XXXXXXXXI 1 1 38 1 3 a m =7E x STEP 1 RT From Minor Street / V9 Conflicting Flows, Vc 1 1/2 V3+V2- 53 + 437 - 490 vph( ')c9 ) Critical Gap, Tc 1 Tc- 5 secs ( Tab. 10.2 ) Potential Capacity, Cp 1 Cp9a 719 pcph (Fig. 10.3 ) Actual Capacity, Cm Cm9=Cp9= 719 pcph STEP C t_T From Major :Street a saasssxassxaaaaax==aa=-= x __c ==r_=xara:aacaa2aa=e=x=a=x=xxxx=sxsa2xxasalaxx.a Conflicting Flows, Vc I V3+V2- IOS * 374 - 979 vph(Vc4 ) Critical Gap, Tc I Tc- 5 secs ( Tab. 10.2 ) Potential Capacity, Cp 1 Cp4- 40" pcph (Fig. 10.3 ) % of Cp utilized and Impedance Factor 1 (V4/Cp4 )„100- 4.2% P4- .97 Actual Capacity, Cm (Fig. 10.S ) I Cm4-Cp4= 40'" pcph STF.P 3 LT From Minor Street V7 e=__-aaaascsaaa=xasx=zx=r.-====sv__=.mxxaasa=asaa==a=x==x2====uax.a=ax=s:s=-n Corflicting Flows, Vc : 1/2 V3+VZ+V5+V4- 1 S3 + 874 + 1782 + 16 = 1700 vph( Vc7 ) Critical Gap, Tc 1 Tc- 6.5 secs ( Tab. 10.2 ) Potential Capacity, Cp I Cpl- 85 pcph (Fig. 10.3 ) Actual Capacity, Cm 1 Cm7-Cp7xP4= 85 .97 - B2 pcph ,HARED LANE CAPACITY SH = ( +1)9 ),'( (V7%Cm7 )+( V9/Cm9 ) ) if lane is shared CR CR LOS LOS MOVEMENT I FCPH , CM(PCPH ) CSH(PCPH ) (CM-V ) (CSH-V ) CM C-o =s=cs==xm===-_=_axa _e=naasaxaa=asa=aasaasa=a==a==-xvaxsssax===aa=.ass=mac n=-. ' 7 l83 500 R I 561 E A �f 9 .8 719 600 681 561 A 4 17 402 -�B5 8 LnrATIC%N,.aE_ENe R9 a LOCUST �IAMF,E.,C1 C -cYtCTii tr{r, 111 HOURLY l-1MrC N = ! -a ! ul, } } X11 t ! cove_===cva_vevvvvesss } } Llla a�=znz=sv-==_v-.a==zx== !---------_ll.-.. C�f7 Nx 'J la - _LIl------------ w----------1.14-- 43 A C.a --1.17------------ major r c,,e,d -rade fM 4. __II---------- --- . ". ! a 0 WAD TW I_I? t MP ua ! v i r1 n nets of Cour e'MAG. !997 1.10 ! T,-- Period,PM PCA1 Nn!IR '^inor road a ! Fre,.,al ling Speed- 'S LOCUSTPur ac aQI01aL1�Vl aaameemzrime==vn=e=a=o_aansnazn==ao=eaaz=zz-ccmc=.xnee=-_=v=noes==x=vm=======�.c 1.Ifit <!ME ant�!c7McnET= Mo amen! n0. l ! 7 ! 7 ! 4 C ! S 1 '7 t G ! G l a ! I I l7 ! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume f ,'Ph ! 101 4RAt 4c} 43! Gla! lc} lLA5} rs} rpI!. `a! G! 70! --------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1I,.1f��F,\� 'e1., t01, 1 } lQ1!YYKY }1fY\flfl 4�!1LY�tY !1LYY1l ! 101 ! �! Cal 7tN! G! ?QI! VOLLIHE TN Of-PW ===_=vvavvznz=ezzssasassmmmsassmmsamsmsas:saazaxxa===m==xz-===veesassmssmsssmmm l to l 11 1 7 I , ----------uc__ =x --111------------^ --------Ud-- dC sm -.-117-- ------ cn_= =szsasassaa-v=sa= II`7 ! _mv__mo= _====arv_va❑a 1aG � C ! 114 4 ra nrATION,c.pssp.BU99 a LOCUST '; . -CVTST+!INC„I.I s_amamaaaa==s2:z=a==asxsaa== ===v2ss22Ssssa2o====c.._=2=aaaaaz=azczvnsx2==c_�._=__ ;1Cp 1 QT C',-,.. M, C1. eoi Ila ! CI�.r , II, 1 /� II3�1.1�aII�Q 1 /� LIQ J.LIGmllr 17 ..,a ., .. r pct e,1t1 1 �.e_bcIt),,CY_, IE%.31 ! rp4 m Q3a pn"FK ! r'n,17 a 917 pcph '! of C,p ut111zed t c�11Z/rp121@Q= 3.3%. Impedance Fact-.r, p LC1y 1a 5 ,! P9= .97 plum QQ Actual '_3p`=C2t), Cm l rmcturn,Qa Q-01 _i,, T C p I T C. M>, _.+-4 Cl-,.;a.� 11•�t117a11�d LIQ+II�ml.l�t 154 S-29- Cr I,. I c a I ?E=Crlr .caI bap, Tc ! Tab. 1e.7l ! 5 ! sere. ) 5 secs. Potential CapacIty,CpcF:p1Ch.31 Cp4 m 706 pcph } Cpl - 671- X. of Cp ut: l:Zed 6.4.%. } Impedance sector, p 'sIg. let.S p,►a ,96 } Pi- .99 Actual Ctpac=t'., r., rr�:rpea 717E RC�h l C(wlmfYtn Q'G rprF� 2==Saxaa=a-__�_____-�'==aaaxx 2=a2�----”�--=aa=mxSmSa=a=xxaa22a2a=ex--G=Sxa__aria CTPP TU G. M: Gireoi Ilp 11 ! s araa•.r aaaaasaaa=a-aaaaxaa=aaaaaaaxaaaararasaaasax2asaasaaraaamra,sasaaaaraaaaaa r?nF12Ct2!fy^ Clgyr�, i1� ! ,Cll3atl7iLlilUC.1115111GsI;In,R! ,CLIC611.IS�ll4lll`211171111a11�t l ! ??� ¢QQl♦ le+ t51 ! @+ E-29* LZi ACt } 578+ aim lek?9 wph ! 4E0+ 10a 1094 ;Gh Critical Esp, Tc 1Tab. 10,7 ) } 6�( eecs. > ! 6 ( secs. ) potential f�pa�:4,� l �,L C1.�lA 1! rpq = 24.3 pcph } rp!! _ .1.17 pcph Df CP .t 1l_zed } S 419/rpB l�laLa 7 Sv } c ill l ir-1 l ),lee= 2. 1+S trpedence Carter- P Pe- .gg l Pll- .99 Actual Cepac:ty' Cm } CM9mrpsmplr,P4 } Call=Cpl!-.Pl •P4 } 2-1a 743.,99..,ggpcph } 275.a 237;-.99. .96pcph _=_2=_xxaaaaaaa:a2aaxaosaaaaz=aaaaaaasaaaaaaaaxaaa=sx=saris-aaaaaamxaazaaaaa22x '._TCP & T C, -- M.- Cireel �xass�xacs=av2az:a22sexssnasaca2=.=cros__c_=s=ass=aaa=ax=s=== s ==.oxx==_v 2.==_� Confl:ct:^y Cl"�,w.e' 1.1c1_Q/. _te�.J 111111+1i117r11�71 Ilett N�e.r�laLlQ�lIQ2u� iJ ! IA?g+ ci aaa 1114vph } I0+Ca A, V,i. CLA I!5ovph Critical bap, Tc � Teb. lO.7 ) E.5 Poten,tiel Cspacity,Cp(Fig10.3) ! Cpl m 19E pcph } Co10 195 pcph Actual Capacity, Cm ! r«i7mrp?.pl .p4nP1lr.Pl? } Cm1@=r^I�:,P4-:p! .pa pa ! a IRI pcp►, •-r I i i nraTtnN,nacENBURS @ L nCUST PlAME ,n,c _cv�cT.i tNr Fll SHAPED LANE CPPP-C T TY APPPn4f`Id M111.ICMEA}TG 7�G�a Co ra LOS LOS MntIEMENT Ur Droll i (`M/Pr pw 1 Cc!{c prpH, r rM_u r rgH_u 1 CM CAH xaxax:xxa==vxxxzxaxzsaz:sasvaaa.azssasf:arfafra:xffxxxssxzzrfffsszfaasaaaarfrr■ 7 ±aE !n! 76 E 5 ?.! 702 ?25 546 r a a Sg 97Ll 7LA? QED cgs A P appanp,CH MOYEMENTC !@, !! , !? Cp CCR i n% I-nc MgL'EMENT Ur PCPH CM! PCC}. 1 f SH!PCPH) l CM-u , CSH_V 1 rM CCH ±a 10 !Ea �!7 !eg n r '7!7 770 7,67 C r.; MP rna STREET LEFT T'IRNS 2 ,4 MOVEMENT Vl PCPH 1 CMr pCpu , Cp(rM_11 sxmazaxo_scnsms sxxaxxvxxaxszsx x.-== v vcae=zxaxazsxavr..==osx�=eaxs-s=ax-a=mcsx 1 101 C-."7C CCC A d AC ?C VC! a COMMENTS i STORAGE LENGTH ANALYSIS p G � Z W 31 a F� WA.SHN64TON '�SLUARE DWVE sio H AP L.ELL AF NORTH APPROACH LANE ASSl(AWHENT5 Ak '� N", 'A, Huff 1 114 A)lE0ASS 217 f0 � 2��i6 Z8 4o QT �� '..JA:" S• � � y . . K 2� 1 y • _5MP-A6%t UhGTH e,�3 (� 3 3^ ' -- ^,3 I, � ; e- F.< 340 40 �p 411 C ; -- D,291) X I �,5. k lo z(o I AS5UtlPTlQt4S :, AV E RA(a E \)E Vi I C-Lr- LE N CST H PLAKINLA FACTOR, �.S N��coLN lv; BY � po- LUKAGj C G- [-ENrl �1-ENClyALYS I S DATE . PIL L 1--trLl_- IMACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED JOB NO -Z&6M 0690 S W BANCROFT STREET PORTLAND,OREGON 9%201 15031 2219580 SHT.--OF F E Hwy 2�� HwY Zig O N P-A"F OFFi2-W I I -k- FeDU«C 'IOIUME. SNo'JN R_ 00EDUCTit N R ,�� " -�-�►2�t cNi RtD R.-r:DR) I STORA&AE LEN GTN L J 4o 81 X . D x 2 �S�l?HPi'IC'NL%E VEHICLE_ (..��l�lla-TN ZO ' FtFAI<1 N I(a FAC TOr< ►,5 + Ll N(_oAN---_1L sy --- _pC�� _S7"O - ry�TH I-7S 1 �_ DATE-A Lel.L___ JOB NO Zf�&5PQ- wulMACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED 0690 S W BANCROFT STREET PORTLAND OREGON 97201 1503)224 9560 SHT ----OF SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS I I PL:M;NAnY 7rk -AFFICSIGNAL WARn�!,7 CALCULATION AOT VOLUMES a:.gUIRE0 TO MEET C :GNAL1ZAT10N Major Street HALL- _ — — Mine- street CAK City of Location 7iUpCQTa Q12 2EVISff) !✓-1(I STINCa Number of Lanes for Moving ADT on Major St . ADT on Minor St . Traffic on Each Intersection :,p,-caching Both Direc_ -.3ns Highest =,pproaching Approach Directions VGlum[: Major Street _Minor St-eet 100% iO4. 10006, 70% WARR4NT 1 Warrants Werra^ts Warrants Warrants 1 1 8,050 6,20,:1 2,650 1 ,850 2 or more 1 10,600 7 ,400 2 ,650 1,850 2 or more 2 or more - 0,600 7 ,e 3, 550 2,500 1 2 or ro-e 8,850 6,�_ : 3,550 2 ,500 WkoR ki7 2 1 1 13, 300 9, 3C: 1 , 3950 2 or more 1 15,900 11,1OJ 1 , 350 950 2 or more 2 or mo-e 15,900 11 ,100 1 ,75J 1,250 1 2 or more :3,300 9,30:- 1,750 1,250 Warrant Used 10C percent of standar' warrants used 7; careen: of standard "arrants used due t: 85 percentile spee_ in excess of MF.'. or isolated comms^.`.y with population less than 10,00? Traffic Data sed for Calct;iaticns : —R-E m TO fl 1:4 N:) . Is Signal Lz-e Volume. Warrant Met WARRANT 1, h1417imuin Vehicular VOi,,,:, 103S(i0) Major 5:-eet . . . . . . . . . 10350 NO Minor Street . . . . . . . . . WARRANT 2, I-_erruption of Continuous Traffic : Major 5:-eet . . . . . . . . . i (03Sa M• nor S t-eet . . . . . . . . . BY AND D--EDee CHECKc= -ND N7 NOTE : ADT vt)Ivw-s based on '(e-\ +i",z PM -a,6' km, uowyn,es et.+ fiw "'A c.- siert IJ:E g A.D,T-.J o.tl jus -po- F9vre- ZF) at` ft. mJ►�,y PKEu:M;NA;;Y --AFFIC SIGNAL WARRMA!,T CALCULATION ALT VOLUMEC REQUIRED TO MEET S :GNALIZATION sM Major S cet AU, _ Minor Street — C i ty of Locat or, �'n,�,�,� _ (�(� REV I�,E?1 Number of _anes for Moving ADT on Major St . ADT on Minor St . Traffic on Each Interstctiol approaching Both Direci - ons Highest pproachin Approach Directions g major Street Minor Street vGlume 100% 70s 100% 70% WARP:-HT 1 1.arrants Warra^.ts Warrants Warrants 1 1 8,550 6,200 2,650 1,850 2 or more 1 10,600 1 ,400 2 ESO ' 850 2 or more 2 or more 10,600 i ,4C,� ?. 550 2,500 1 2 or more 8,850 6,2 3,550 ?,500 W:?:'-^N- 2 1 1 2 or more 13, 300 9, 3C- i , 35u 950 1 15,900 11 , 1G3 1 , 350 950 2 or more 2 or more 1.5 ,900 100 1 ,750 1,250 1 2 or more :3, 300 9,30 1 ,750 1 ,250 Warrant Used 100 nle-.ent of starrier= warrants used 72 e'Cc�it of stan� and warrants used due 35 er: n:i 1e ,-c- o D e s,,C__ in _xcess of MF -r isolated commun":y with populat o- 'ess than 10,000 Traffic Data _ped for Calcuiz:icrs . Int" QIUPI! 4f5 # _ �trn-� No , Approach Is Signal Lvolume Warrant Met WARRANT 1, Mi- '-mum Vehicular vii;,—= (1035)10+ .0�,(y419) Major S=-set . . . . . . Minor St-'et . . . z 12dJ(10)t .os(;419) WARRANT 2, 1-_erruption of Corti%:)us Traffic : Major S_-eet . . . . Mi nor Ct-ani BY AND DA-E 411 /61 CHECK:--' �ND NOTE : ADT volvnrs based on PM foLk. kev-- �lolurhes 4+ �hn, ntR o.- steet Ire. 9 eh��ed A.D;r., O dD'usicd used .vpoP, F,9L,rc. 2-F) af- 5tre,z�`. Vr. (s:.3 2 IC SIGNA_ WA v �_Q0IaE0 To MOST 7 Major Street City of Locat . _- -LA!fx9 N Number of Lanes 'or Mcg ,^g ALT or Major S: . ALT or Minor St . Traff ,c on Eao.n Inte-se�- on ::-;,aChin g Both ,. 'eC . ;,n; Highest =pprOaChiny A.F. :a:h 'Directions v jme c Major -eet Mi�.�r St-eet - _ I00: t loo: lox M Warrants Pi S War ran• Warrants -- 1,850 pr r= - .3,600 ',6 1,850 X600 ` 850 - ��- 2,500 5. , ��= 2,500 r _3303 950 ° .5900 1' ' ' 1 , 35C - 950 2 or m_ _ TrC e .5 900 1,7K 1,250 1 - T .3,300 y ,- 1 , 7 1 ,250 W_a_-ra _S-_=-_ -rants used --- _ rants used d,.e 'e -===- ir excess of e with pop-- _-SS than _D,3['_ T C C . a r - - - - - aT • ^ R o F9 U 4 Is Signal Warrant Me: w��.n;-`, :, N - • 1..'� 'vEhjo,; ar ` _ ioSG(ro) l�//,� M':CrM. .e. 'L- 1015(00 .—p4o IWO WARRAN- 2 , , :e-•upti3n of Traffic : Marr -.m; . N07- ADT volvnw-s based on k- +imes PNI pa,.k tiuv� uclu,,p5 dd }tom ma C,- 5tv",t Inc g es;ed A.o.r , a�,J'Osied lased %,3c„ f•,N-r-e. 2 F) ,C' PPEL:M;NAFcY 'f-\,;FFIC SIGNA.. WAR;A(%7 CALCULATION ADT VOLUM,EE R:pUIRED TG MEET S :GNAL1ZATiON Major Street 6etz?4602(a � Minor S'reet L-ocuST City of LoCdt;on T1 (A AfZ-D 1 OIZ SMISED MISTJAL tLI N o�N�r Number of Lanes for Moving Af)T on Major St . ADT on Minor St . Traffic on Each Intersection Aporoaching Both Direc: -.ons Highest Approaching Approach Directions Volume Major Street Minor Street 100% 70: 100% 70% WARRANT 1 Warrants Warre,ts Warrants Warrants 1 1 8,850 6,300 2,650 1.,850 2 or more 1 10,600 7 ,400 2,650 1,350 2 or more 2 or mere 10,600 7 ,4G 3,550 2,500 1 2 or rr-e 8,850 6,2�" 3,550 2 ,500 W*R=ti- 2 1 1 13, 300 9, 3�: 1 , 3�� 950 2 or more 1 15,900 11 ,1GJ 1 , 350 950 2 or more 2 or more 15,900 11 , _'30 1 ,750 1,250 1 2 or more :3,300 9 ,30':r 1 ,750 1,250 Warrant Used _ 10C ,ercent of s'andcr- warrants used 7C cercen: of standard warrants used due .0 35 per Centile srrec in excess of MP- or isolated comm -- :y with population _ _ss than 10,000 Traffic Data .:see for N�• = ) pr'oaCh Is Signal Lanes Volume Warrant Met WARRANT 1, M;-imum Vehicular Volo 1051-0¢ •23419) Major S--eet . . . . . . . . . Minor S' =et . . . . . . . . . — /�Q�+ o WARRANT 2, 1lierruption, of Corti%ous Traffic : Major S_-Get . . . . . . . . . 2 ��Z M .r,or c--��; N� BY AND DATE CHECKS- SND 'DATE—_NOTE : ADT volumes based on 4to +ins PMPAILk�hovr Uolumv_S q+ o.- S"fieet ITC. g ehe��le.J A.DT-.i aJ;JSk4 based vtx� 59v►-c- ZF) tet- m�►,oy l GAP STUDY i ivtnv� ��..� v.•_��. �_irv>f�� `rL.r��u „vv� JOE3 NU.Lb�o ;-,- 600 BW BANCROF-v PORTLAND. OR 97201 t24-0660 SHEETS OF 4 PROJECT L►NC:lLNI Iv CALCULATIONS FOR _�A AP p � A ►L_ht► 1 7 7 _ MADE 8Y n DATE ,�� CHECKED BY DATE GAP STUDY DATE '� s'1 LOCATION END OF SURVEY TO NEAREST MINUTE START OF SURVEY TO NEAREST MINUTE 3 TOTAL SURVEY TIME MIN UTES S ADEQUATE GAP TIME SECONDS . GAP SIZE NUMBER OF GROUPS 1 (SECONDS) TALLY 2 TOTAL CUMULATIVE COMPUTATIONS �� I z fi 0660 SW BANCROFT PORTLAND. OR 07201 t24-0660 SHEET,= OF ,g,., PROJECT I ti c c,�N 1 �� - CALCULATIONS FOR 1L- ► � MADE BY wDATE . � CHECKED BY �! DATE GAP S T b1DY DAT .R LOCATION ��. E - A7 END OF SURVEY TO NEAREST MINUTE S'-0 o TART OF SURVEY TO NEAREST MINUTE TOTAL. SURVEY TIME MINUTES ADEQUATE GAP TIME SECONDS ., s GAP SIZE NUMBER OF GROUPS 1 (SECONDS) TALLY 2 TOTAL CUMULATIVE COMPUTATIONS 5 I .-1 �M I r-, 0690 SW BANCROFT PORTLAND, OR 07201 t24-9660 _SHEET.=, OF PROJECT �-' � r==�-N i�� CALCULATIONS FOR - h NA L y sy�_______ MADE BY moi_ DATE CHECKED BY _ DATE GAP STUDY DATE 4 Z 5 �LOCATION Lcc7 A END O F SURVEY TO NEAREST MINUTE S TART OF SURVEY TO NEAREST MINUTE S=or) x �� TOTAL SURVEY TWE MINUTES ADEQUATE GAP TIME SECONDS , SES GAP SIZE NUMBER OF GROUPS CUMULATIVE COMPUTATION t (SECONDS) TALLY 2 TOTAL 111 I � i At V L � r T I v ' � I I Iwo# tvo %6� 4 .r...v �� w � &al lew am lv. 0e80 8W BANCROFT PORTLAND. OR 97201 t24-95ao SHEET; OF PROJECT CALCULATIONS FOR AP A & ,jjje MADE BY DATE �Z. CHECKED BY —.__.._ DATE GAP STUDY DATE fyIul LOCATION Loc ,j 5 - ^— \�\�C END OF SURVEY TO NEAREST MINUTE .w TART OF SURVEY TO NEAREST MINUTE S ! Sr TOTAL SURVEY TIME MINUTES `p ADEQUATE GAP TIME SECONDS . 7 sL, - GAP SIZE NUMBER OF GROUPS 1 (SECONDS) _TALLY Z TOTAL CUMULATIVE COMPUTATION 9 II �± -44 11► 1 3 FOUR LINCOLN CENTER DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND VARIANCE April 15, 1987 Trammell Crow Company P.O. Box 5396 Portland, Oregon 97228 Mackenzie/Saito & Associates, P.C. Mackenzie Engineering Incorporated 0690 S.W. Bancroft Street Portland, Oregon 97201 (503) 224-9570 IL _ .. _ . _ I . DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL: This is a proposal for Site Development Review for the fourth phase of the Lincoln Center office complex. The proposal includes administrative variances 1) to allow a building of 176 feet in height; 2) to provide up to 45% compact parking spaces; and 3) to allow compact parking spaces 8 feet in width. The existing phases of Lincoln Center were approved by Washington County, in several separate applications which applied the "Office Commercial" zone and specific Development Reviews. Two pending Land Use applications in the County will allow portions of the parking for this project to be constructed: a. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Zone Change for three parcels :n the southeast corner of the site, to change the designation to Office Commercial ; and b. A Special Use permit for four parcels at the intersection of S.W. Lincoln Street and S.W. Locust Street for parking in the R-5 zone. Since the site has been recently annexed to the City of Tigard, the City wilt consider this proposed Site Development Review and Variance Application. It is anticipated that County zoning will be changed to the City zoning prior to approval of the proposal. This phase of Lincoln Center will include about 200,000 gross sq. ft. of building area, in a sinqle building of 13 stories. Within this area, approximately 8,000 sq. ft. of service retail space will be provided (within the first floor of the building) . Parking will be provided in surface lots, plus a three story parking structure, totaling Ila spaces. This project will continue the extremely successful concepts of the first three phases of Lincoln Center, with high quality "Class A" space and amenities. The project, as proposed, meets all dimensional and use standards of the "Commercial/Professional" zone, except as noted above. 11. DISCUSSION OF THE PROPOSED HEIGHT VARIANCE: This proposed variance to the height limitation of the "CP" zone will allow the proposed building to be built to a maximum of 176 feet above the adjacent finished grade, plus the mechanical penthouse, while the Code requirement is 45 feet. Building height is a function of a number of factors that contribute to the decision making process. These include the economics of floor area as a functio,i of building footprint, Building Code provisions with respect to const.ructioi requirements for various building heights. site characteristics, adjacent lard uses, and the ability to provide sufficient on-site parking and landscaping. Each of these is discussed below. Floor Area with Respect to Footprint An analysis of site development must consider the amount of building floor arEa that is both necessary to allow an economically feasible project, and possible based upon site conditions and the need for anci , lary uses. In this case, it will b,2 noted from a review of the accompanying site plan that the area of the footprint of the proposed building is about the same as the footprint area of Two Lincoln Center and Three Lincoln Center. The owner's analysis has shown, however, thi,t additional floor area is needed for an economically feasible project, based upon current land costs and market conditions. Therefore, in order to increase floor area, while maintaining necEssary parking and landscaping, the height must be increased. On-Site Anc i l l a,'y Uses An appropriate amount of on-site vehicular parking, plus landscaping, is necessary for a successful project and to meet Zoning Code requirements. Since parking within a structure is much more costly than surface parkinq, a balance must be achieved between structured parking, surface parking, and floor area. The amount of parking that can be provided establishes the total floor area that be accommodated on a site. Building Code Provision The Uniform Building Code has specijl life and safety provisions for buildings over 75 feet in height which includes requirements for water storage (for sprinklers) pressurized stair wells and Type I FR construction. In addition to Code issues, once 6 floors or approximately 75 ft. is exceeded, vertical trAnsportation system efficiency must be increased, which requires substantial cost increases. The cost of these additional requirements is such that a 7 or 8 story building is not economically feasible, since the additional costs cannot be distributed over enough floor area to justify the expenditure for life and safety, and transportation systems. These costs directly affect the market position of the building. Without sufficient square footage to offset the added costs, rent would exceed the market rate. Adjacent Land Uses The proposed building is the fourth phase of Lincoln Center which, when combined with adjacent Lincoln Saving and Loan building and the office building between S.W. Oak Street and Highway 217, will make it one of six significant buildings in very close proximity. This lessens the impact of increasing the height, and adds to the need to increase the height. A-sthetically, the increased height will add variety and interest to the skyline, and will provide a focal point and identification for the project. Adjacent non-commercial land uses are also a consideration with respect to visual intrusion and the creation of shadows. Accompanying drawings show the relationship of the proposed building to the adjacent properties, and the potential effect of the proposed height with increased setback, compared to the allowed 45 feEt at the Code required setback. It will be seen that the small footprint and increased setback reduce the potential impact of increased height, anu that no adverse impact will occur on adjacent properties. III. DISCUSSION OF THE PROPOSED PARrING SIZE AND COMPACT RATIO VARIANCES: The proposed variances to the City's compact parking space size and percent of compact spaces will allow the continuation of the design Jandards established by the first three phases of Lincoln Center. These standards also meet the County' s criteria, as noted by the following comparison. City_ County Proposed Standard size: 9' -0" x 18' -0" 8' -6" x 18' -0" 91 -0" x 18'-0" Compact size: 8' -6" x 15' -0" 7' -6" x 15' -0" 8' -0" x 15' -0" Percent compact: 25% 50% 45% Trammell Crow' s experience in the operation of the existinq phases of Lincoln Center shows that the size and proportion of compact spaces allows an efficient site design both in terms of function of the parking facility and in the availability of adequate i4rea for landscaping. The continuation of this design will provide an appropriate number of spaces while maintaining an acceptable overall parking facility. IV. REVIEW OF VARIANCE CRITERIA: Section 18.134.050 of the City Development Code provides several criteria which must be met by a proposeu variance. Each is addressed is follows: Criteria 1 "The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this Code, be in conflict with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan, to any other applicable policies and standards; and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity." Comment: The total site developmentproposal must be viewed as an integrated design for a thoroagh evaluation with respect to Code purposes and Plan policies. Generally, it is the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and the Development Code to provide for office uses in an environment conducive to business, as well as compatible with adjacent areas. As described above, the decision with respect to building height, as well as parking design, is the result of a complex analysis of many factors. It is the overall intent of this project to establish a high quality environment, compatible with its surroundings, which is also the purpose of the development code. The specific basis for the requested variances is discussed in following sections. It should also be noted that Section 18.98 of the Development Code allows building height to be increased to 75 feet, provided that certain criteria are met. Although the 75 foot limit is not sufficient to allow the proposed project, a review of the criteria is beneticial to an understanding of the proposal. 'The total floor are of the building does not exceed one and one half the area of the site;" As noted above, the F.A.R. of the project is less than 1 : 1. 'The yard dimensions in each case are equal to at least one half of the building height of the principal structure;" The yard dimension, rt approximately 220 feet, is 1 .25 times the building height. "The approval of this exception is a part of the approval of the conditional use allowed under Chapter 18.130;" This project does not otnerwise require a conditional use; the proposed variance is included in the Site Development Review process. 'The structure is not abutting a residential zoning district." In addition to the substantial setback, there is a public right-of-way between the proposed structure and residential districts. Criteria 2: "There are special circur^stances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the sarre zoning district." Building Height Comment: The proposed project is the fourth phase of Lincoln Center and will include the last area with office development potential west of S.W. Lincoln Street. The character of the a -ea, as noted above, is an intensive office commercial centar, which is a node of activity in this portion of Washington County. Tne opportunity for development of this site to the maximum extent possible, based upon site and development conditions, will allow completion of the pattern of development already established. As described above, the decision with respect to hiilding height is the result of a complex analysis of economics, land potential; and Code consideration. The result is a bala ce of economic feasibility, potential return on investment, the prc, ti,,ion of a complete si �e development package and the impact of Ccde consideration. In this this case, the decision to construct relatively high h„ - Iding is influenced largely by the potential to increase floor area, while utilizing a relatively small building footprint to preserve the maximum site area. This site is unique in the area due to its proximity to the existing office uses and ability to be developed as part of this complex. The height variance will allow its development in a manner consistent with o ese uses, and nearly to the same intensity. The actual F.A.R. (floor to area ratio), after development of the fourth phase as proposed, will be .76: 1 ur about a 17% increase above the existing level of development ( .63: 1) . This increase is negligible in terms of potential impact, and represents significantly less building area than allowed in mixed use areas such as John's Landing (City of Portland-Macadam Plan District) which allows up to a 2: 1 F.A.R. Parking Variance Comment: The proposed variances to the compact size and proportion standards will allow the continuation o; design standards currently employed in the t?xisting phases of the project, and which would be allowed under the applicable County zoning. This proposal, therefore, explicitly meets this criteria since these design standards are necessary to allow the fourth phase to be completed in a manner comparable with the earlier phases. Criteria 3: "The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this Code and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably pnssible, while permitting some economic use of the land;" Comment: The proposed office building and associated parking are allowed by the CP zone. The intensity of the development, as indicated !-y the Floor .Area Ratio aescribed above, is consistent with the existing development of the first three phases of the project as well as with the CP zone,. The economic aspects of the project are described above. Criteria 4: "Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land form; or parks will not he adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were located as specified in the Code;" Building Height Comment: The proposed building has been designed as an integral element of the Lincoln Center office complex, with access, circulation, parking, and landscaping designed to enhance the entire site. Accompanying drawings indicate that the building will be situated approximately 220 feet from the nearest property line, which is the westerly limit of the proposed Lincoln Street extension. Therefore, the building will be about 280 feet from the closest non-office zoned property. An analysis of height with respect to setback indicates that the increased setback w411 reduce the potential impact of the building heiynt. Further, the small footprint, compared to what would be raquired if the 45 foot limit were maintained, will actually assure a reduction of impact on adjacent properties, including shadow patterns. Parking Variance Comment The proposed parking design criteria have functioned adequately on the ecistinq first three phases of Lincoln Center, and no adverse effects on adjacent propertip> have been identifi ,d. An inspection of the existing parking area shows that it is aesthetically pleasing and functionally appropriate, thereby indicating that its continuation meets this criteria. Criteria 5: "The hardship is not self-imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship." BuildingHHeight Comment The hardship in this case is specifically related to the ability of this site to be devc_loped in a mariner commensurate with adjacent properties, while providing adequate parking and landscapinq and protecting ahuttinq non-- commercial uses. The height standard of the Code is based upon an arbitrary assumption, without the benefit of the type of analysis which has been prepared for this property. The absolute height of the proposed building is not as important as its relationship to adjacent land uses and compatibility with dissimilar activities. No oersonal circumstances are cited as the basis fir the hardship. Parking Variance Comment The issue with respect to the parking variance and this criteria is similar to the comment noted above. No personal hardshipF are cited, and the proposal is not intended to justify an existing condition. The owner has found that the proposed standards are appropriate, and they would have been consistent with the applicable criteria if the County zoning had been retained. I V. SUWAR f This proposea Development Review and Variance package has been prepared after a thorough analysis of the various factors that determine floor a--ea, fcotprint and building height. The proposal has been found to be both economically feasible and consistent with the character of the existing development i,i the area. The variance criteria, as addressed above, are met by the proposal when the project is viewed as an integrated package. / ) REQUESTS FOR C(V11MENTS ' TO: I N''` �I�� 4 �' ----- DATE: March 24• 1 q87 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SEE REVERSE SI 01E M- yr\\\ ray on M7 PLANNING DEPT. Attached is the Site' Plan and applicant' s statement for your review. From information supplied by various dopar•tments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a d--cision wi) l be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by May 8'h , 1987 _ You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments If_jou are_unable to respond by the above date,. please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confi►-m your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planing Department, P.O. Boy7 2339 Burnham and Ash Ave. , Tigard, OR 97223. Phone: 639--4171. STAFF CONTACT: 4 L& tAL-j l f PLEASE CHECK 111E FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact _ of our office —� Please refer to the encloeed letter. ZIT Written comments; � �N�'1c. NSPUN 11A4 - - Ltjw, - -� �---- ----- i Name of Person Commenting: ' 1 &' Phone No (1($L:"/0356P) WASHZNQTON COUN V Inter-Department Correspondence Date May 18, 1987 To Paula Calvin, Transportation Planning Coordinator i From Daryl Steffan, Traffic Analyst Subject FOUR LINCOLN CENTER - REVIEW COMMENTS FOR CITY OF TIGARD I have reviewed the traffic analysis and site plan for this development and have the following comments and recommendations. TRIP GENERATION ^ounty policy is to adhere to ITN: recommended rates and procedures unless evidence is supplied to Justify alternate rates and procedures. The estimated 1 trip generation deviates from ITE procedures resulting in an underestimation of expected trip generation and impact resulting fro* this development. Trip generation an calculated utilized ITE woe code 710; General Office, resulting in an estimated 3,419 vpd average daily trips and 378 vph PM exiting trips, based on a factor of 1.38 exiting trips per kef. Assuming that rode 710 Is appropriate, the factor should be adjusted to reflect actual percentage of the total PM trips; ( ( 1 .38)/(1 .36)+(0.27))•(2.20) - 1 .84, •278 kef - 510 vph PM exiting trips. However, ITE recommends estimating average daily trips using the curve given in c Figure I in the 700 section of the manual and the peaking charect2ristics from the appropriate use code or table. The caiculated daily trip rate (12.30 trips per ksf) appears reasonably-Close to a rete obtained vie Figure 1 . However, the ! PM exit peaking characteristics for a building size over 200 ksf Is le.8% of the daily trips, or 564 vph. 1 STACKING ANALYSIS County policy is to utilize a peeking factor of 2 and vehicle .lengths of 25 feet, jnationally recognized standards, unless evidence is supplied to Justify an alternate factor or length. The calculated lengths utilized a peaking factor of 1 .5 and vehicle lengths of 20 feet. 1 FOL.. LINCOLN CENTER - REVIEW CONMEN FOR CITY OF TIGARD Page 2 of 2 RECOMMENDATIONS It is uncertain what, if any, the effect of using the revised trip generation ! rates and factors An the stacking analysis would have on the Impact analysis. However, due to this uncertainty. I recommend the applicant analyze the impacts of this development considering.the above discussion. Specific concerns include: 1 . The Greenburg/Mapleleaf intersection. As the 1985 HCM recommends, a composite LOS of the intersection as a whole is not in itself an adequate measure of the Intersections performance. ►,ane group v/c ratios that near 1 .00 should be considered a condition requiring mitigation. Considering projected volumes are being utilized, v/c ratios greater than 0.95 are critical . 2. Stacking lengths should be checked to insure stacking does not interfere with operations at the Greenburg/Mapleleaf and Greenburg/Locust intersections. c: Ron We-Inman, Washington County Randy Woolley City of Tigard / REQUESTS FOR OOMMENTS TO: ( _4144LP _._ DATE: March 24, 1 qA7 FR(M: Tigard Plannirr1 Department i R E: E "'.....�..� vi M AY 1 19y_ 10 ' ' CII Y OF I IUAHrMNINO - @-DEf'` .--- - -- - Attached is the Site Pian and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near ruture. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your- coirment; by _ May _- 8th _ , 1987 — You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your crmments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comme-its in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions o-egarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Oepartment, P.O. Box M97. Burnham and•Ash Ave. , T)gard, OR 97223. Phone: 634-4171. STAFF OONTACT: PLEASE CHECK TNF FOLLOWING ITEMS TH(iT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of' our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments : .yAMVI�-a T 7__1�!!.j[� Name of Pprson Common-ti 1s Phone No r-JP (KSI_:pm/0356P) APPLICATION - STREET IMPROVEMENT/EXCAVATION LOPY TO ORDINANCE NO 74-14 11(mil 11 ) ,I n.l Ej(y1 I LOW) -WSI'. )INSTRUCTIONS ON SEPARATE SHEET) (PINK) OTI11 11 A(u NI Y BIcig i(FILUF)-Arm ICANt APPROVED X APPLICATION NO, 110 NOT APPROVED CI I OF I IGARD, OREGON FEE AMT. S PENDING FEE P,AT. ❑ CITY IIALL RECEIPT NO. PF_NDINGSF_URITY ❑ PUBLICWORKS QEPARTMENT BY ___. DA .E / PENDING AGENCY 'OK" ❑ \101cation and ProgTess Record — — — — — — — — — — —'. — — — MAINTENANCE BOND PENDING INFORMATION ❑ _E/__ FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT/EXCAVATION A% IIeUuiNFI) X ANNUAL PENDING VARIANCE 2 EXPIRATION DATE. PERMIT NO _-274-87 _- DATE ISSUED: _ _ 1_ _-1BY ( 1) APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO EXCAVATE FOR AND INSTALL IiAhE_S� 1M1'BO1hM�N1'S -- - AS DESCRIBED HEREIN, IN FULL ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS APPL ICANT Trammel Crow Co. 10300 S.W. Greenburg Rd. Portland, OR 977.28 245-9400 CI7V ►NONE-- - — CONTRACTOR Uarsons _F,YZWVa' inq Inc..__-.1.9MACi le Rd OP. 97140 6.92-9c350 NAME ADDRFSS 1W 1_-OP 97 ---- -- ---p CITY — PLANS BY Mackenzie/Saito Assoc.,_ P.C. 069.0 S.W. Bancroft St.. Portland, OR 224-9570 NAME_- __-.__ ADDREfS _ CITY ---.__—"j.HONE ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT TO AL VALUATION ( COST): S _ 36,416.00 ---- — DOLLARS (2) EXCAVATION DATA. Fol•orf-ICK USE: -_- MIN —_ 00.04 Xit-36,416_00 = s l,a )h,h4 STREET __ DESCRIPTION PROGRESS & INSPECTION STATUS NAME SURFACE CUT CUT CUT MATERIAL INSTALLED TYPE LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH ITEM 4 QUANTITY ITEM DATE REMARKS/TYPE BY STREET -OPENED C ion 1 anj q TI O ESTIMATED STREET OPENING DATE: / / E — ESTIMATED STREET CLOSING DATE: � / T ---- - -- E (3) SECURITY NO. __ SECURITY AMT.: $ _34,416.00 STREET -- �— �.- SURETY CO : CLOSE_ FINAL -- _ CE:7TIFIED CHECK ❑ CASH ❑ •OND t INSPEC. (4) PLOT PLAN: INDICATE SITE PERTINENT PHYSICAL SPECIAL PROVISIONS !CONDITIONS FrATURES; EXCAVATION LOCATION AND EXTENT. All work shall _conform to the I I City approved plan therefor. . I 1 Work Area t 2L.sraff i ro contl ,shall I& Uroo _ vide, for b app�.ca,,t in AeMOM- - conformance with the City app- - - - - - - - -)MAW - - • _ _ - Ix XXXX}CX oved plan therefor. -3) Not-ify City Ins�ector 24 hrs Mom - c�11s prior to wnrk csmwncermnC: ^1 } I - - -- --- - 1 ;' ----- (639-4171 Mr. Mike Mills) _9"r.- L1Laylar cf all WD& shalI I I I _�� tarati i ;hP--=1 by galicants (SI NOTE THE CITY OF TIGARD DOES NOT, HEREAY, GRANT PERMISSION TO Arrt!(ANTS TO CONDUCT WORK WHRRE RIGHT OF-WAV JURISDICTION IS THAT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OR THE STATE OF OREGON. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO DEPOSIT THE REQUIRED SECURITIES, TO COMPLY WITH ALL PERTINENT LAWS AND CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS PERTINENT TO CONDUCT OF THE WORK, AND TO SAVE HARMLESS TNR CITY AND EMPLOYEES AGAINST ANY INJUF'Y OR DAMAGE WHICH MAY RESULT FROM APPLICANTS ACTIONS. *A gate $329.76 stmt-Alight energy d mriLnt. ci�i.t is reldmi. APPLICANTS SIGNATURc OA TE -I -._! M ituomaJki C)ovv.3rLt3r, t�ragon� To r. �.-•� -- Dafe WHILE YOU WERE OUT Phone_ M�G TELEPHONED ALLY' r 1U�NCD r Wl , ' - 9/4 WKNT,,, TO %kk you pd-51 �'yo t z� N„►c 5�...1,�y,�� ►� C.Q.N.. i i Y (�,Pc.v� rrtcc� ��,,,,,�1�4•d...1t� 1 LETTER TE.R OF COMMIT'MENI' (Performance Bond) We have received from _ _ __ _(lend irig in-0 ilut.ion) a loan commitment- in the amount of $36,416.00, to finance impr•uvemr.nt of a street, located in the City of Tigard, said street being commonly known as SW Oak Street. This loan commitment is specifically for construction purposes for. 1) public: streets, inclt,H.-rig curbs, base, surfacing, aprons, sidewalks, mailbox clusters and utilities, 2) storm sewers 3) utility relocations and adjustments 4) streetlights. All such improvements are to be completed in conformity with City approved construction plans and the 4treet opening permit agreement thervingear•d. We have agreed that disbursement of the $36,416.00 will. be made in accord with the following schedule upon completion of each, or all, item(s) ; but riot. including the hold--back described below. ITEM AMOUNT Site Preparation/Grading 5, 187.00 Concrete Curb 2.,02.0.00 Street (base rock, leveling rock, base A.C. ) 9,957.00 Storm Sewer & appurtances 10,555.00 Concrete Sidowalk & Driveway Aprons 3,798.00 Asphalt (street overlay) 3,999.00 Street. Lighting 900.00 We have entered into a "Street Opening Permit Agreement" whereby we have agreed to .install all improvements in accordance with the requirements of the City of Tigard and we are hereby authorizing you to hold the abovo -stated funds to pay them to us only when the following has been adhered to. That: the City of Tigard has provided certification acknowledging completion of any or all work pursuant to the above itemized schedule of improvements . Pursuant to the above schedule, 20% of the commitment: funds (i .e. , $7,283.20) will be held back through the normal one year guarantee period or until final City Acceptance of the project takes place or until. the City is provided with a separate maintenance bond, effective for said one year period from the date of City conditional acceptance of the work, to assure continued freedom from defects, and maintenance, during the guarantee period. Piigp 2 I otter of Commitment l:()nrr.irtord with the final release of these fur-4s, establishment. proceedings will be institul ,?d. I1. is understood and approved by all parties of concern to this letter of commitment that t:he City of Tigard .hall have first claim and priority to the sum of $36,41.6.00, less disbursempncs approved by the City of Tigard, in the ovpnt of any defect(s)/or failures) to correct such in the construction of thea required improvements. 1' is fur•thpr understood and agreed that. the aforsaid pri:)rity of claim is paramount to all parties including the lending institution making the lo�-An and that. the Iend ifig institution hers covenanted and agreed that the sum of $36,416.00 less disbursements approved by the City of Tigard shall be held available to satisfy any aforomentionod claim by the City notwilhstandiricl default on locin by borrowing party or termination of loan by Iondirnj institution. DATE:_ _^ _ Sincerely Yours, Trammel Crow Company By:X - Approved and Accepted: (Lending Institution) 8Y : (Attach notary information (Title) and signature(s) authority) cs/2289D k Developer -- Engineer Agrevnierd City Engineer 13125 SW Nall Blvci . PO Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 RF: Oak S1rnrff_,_-r-ialf Strnpr Tmprny===t _ (N�tme of Project) Dear City Engineer: We herzby certify that Mackenzie/Sa9.to & Assoc. P.C. (Name of Engineer) has been retained by _ Irrarrmel CrawCcmpan�.�- --- (Name of Developer) to perform the following work perLinent to the above project. I . Perform the surveying or verify the existing surveying information as necessary for the design. 2. If necessary, provide for the expertise of other engineers such as soils or structural engineers and, also, oversee materials and systems testing . 3 . Prepare construction drawings in accordance with the City standards and obtain the City, :,end if applicable, DEQ, County, or State approval of such dr•awinc s . 4. Supply construction staking. 5. Provicie adequate inspection to assure compliance with City Specifications, and koo p accurate field mites in order to prepare "as-built" drawings . 6 . Upon completion of construction provide one set of as-built drawings on mylar• to the City. 7. Upon completion of construction provide written certification that all improvements are complete in accord with the approved plans and specifications . H. Obtain City approval prior to any substantial deviation from the approved plans . 9 Resolve engineering and construction related problems as may arise . We ag-ee to notify the City immediately if the above agreement is terminated or' if the Engineer for any reason is unable to perform the above duties . Tramnel Crcnw Co. : Kickenzie/Saito & Assam:. P.C. : -- k Developer '- Engineer Date Date sb/3512P KEN LEONARD ''�G44- BAUGH CONSTRUCTION CO. Beaverton Tech Center 14155 S.W. Bngadoon Ct. P.O. Box 767 97075 --. - Beaverton,Oregon(503)811.2500 0 PARSONS EXCAVATING INC. Gregory A. Parrons President 19600 A S.W Cipole Rd Sherwood,OR 97140 692-5850 l 1 4 ! � 1 � i � jai . . : i .•.....w , } 4 h 9 r� �r b z co ru 0 z Q. 0 U N T ES � � 0 TM. D- 5054 P.V.G. El-C. IN OVERLAY AREA � Q `JASHINGTON CO. DEPT. OF M - DEV AILS DESI&NATEO Lu Ov EMENT DESIGN 43TANCARV-5", Q D JULY .2 , 196cp w � ,tNG CONDITIOWS h > S ~ w y v, w' 28--87 NOTOP CONSTRUCTION � �1- "' o �► ..�..�.:...:...:�.�..:�.�_.�,:_�. � ... � : 190 z w � u l d3 ...�.:..jla V , . . . . . . . Y...